SEC Form 10-K Filing Report

Company: WASHINGTON POST CO
CIK: 104889
SIC Code: 8200
Filing Date: 2011-03-02 00:00:00
Market Capitalization: 3526697.549987793

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Item 1. Business.
The Washington Post Company (the “Company”) is a diversified education and media company. The Company’s Kaplan subsidiary provides a wide variety of educational services, both domestically and outside the United States. The Company’s media operations consist of the ownership and operation of cable television systems, newspaper publishing (principally The Washington Post) and television broadcasting (through the ownership and operation of six television broadcast stations). The Company sold Newsweek magazine in the third quarter of 2010.
Information concerning the consolidated operating revenues, consolidated income from operations and identifiable assets attributable to the principal segments of the Company’s business for the last three fiscal years is contained in Note R to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Revenues for each segment are shown in Note R gross of intersegment sales. Consolidated revenues are reported net of intersegment sales, which did not exceed 0.1% of consolidated operating revenues.
The Company’s operations in geographic areas outside the United States consist primarily of Kaplan’s foreign operations and formerly, the publication of the international editions of Newsweek. During the fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, these operations accounted for approximately 11%, 12% and 13%, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated revenues, and the identifiable assets attributable to foreign operations represented approximately 13% of the Company’s consolidated assets at each of January 2, 2011, January 3, 2010, and December 28, 2008.
Education
Kaplan, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, provides an extensive range of education and related services worldwide for students and professionals. Kaplan conducts its operations through four segments: Kaplan Higher Education, Kaplan Test Preparation, Kaplan International and Kaplan Ventures.
The following table presents the net revenue for the three years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 for each of Kaplan’s reportable segments:
See Note R to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the segment information required by Items 101(b) and 101(d) of Regulation S-K.
Kaplan Higher Education
Kaplan Higher Education provides a wide array of certificate, diploma and degree programs-on campus and online-designed to meet the needs of students seeking to advance their education and career goals.
In 2010, Kaplan’s U.S.-based higher education division included the following businesses: Kaplan University and Kaplan Higher Education Campuses. Each of these businesses is described briefly below.
Kaplan University
Kaplan University specializes in online education, is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools and holds other programmatic accreditations. Most of Kaplan University’s programs are offered online, while some are offered in a traditional classroom format at 12 campuses in Iowa, Maine, Maryland and Nebraska, and 5 Kaplan University Learning Centers in 4 additional states. Kaplan University also includes Concord Law School, a fully online law school. At year-end 2010, Kaplan University had approximately 58,200 students enrolled in online programs and 7,400 students enrolled in its classroom-based programs.
Kaplan Higher Education Campuses
At the end of 2010, Kaplan’s Higher Education Campuses business consisted of 63 schools in 17 states that were providing classroom-based instruction to approximately 38,500 students (including the 7,400 students enrolled at Kaplan
2010 FORM 10-K 1
University’s on-ground campuses). Each of these schools is accredited by one of several regional or national accrediting agencies recognized by the U.S. Department of Education.
Program Offerings and Enrollment
Kaplan University and Kaplan Higher Education Campuses offer degree and certificate programs in a variety of subject areas. Among them are the following:
Master’s
Bachelor’s
Associate’s
Certificate
•Arts and Sciences
•Business Management
•Criminal Justice
•Health Sciences
•Higher Education Studies
•Information Systems and Technology
•Legal and Paralegal Studies
•Nursing
•Teacher Education
•Arts and Sciences
•Business Management
•Criminal Justice
•Fire Safety and Emergency Management
•Health Sciences
•Information Systems and Technology
•Legal and Paralegal Studies
•Nursing
•Political Science and Public and Environmental Policy
•Arts and Sciences
•Business Management
•Criminal Justice
•Fire Safety and Emergency Management
•Health Sciences
•Information Systems and Technology
•Legal and Paralegal Studies
•Nursing
•Political Science and Public and Environmental Policy
•Criminal Justice
•Health Sciences
•Information Systems and Technology
•Nursing
Kaplan University and Kaplan Higher Education Campuses enrollment at December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 totaled by degree and certificate programs were as follows:
Financial Aid Programs and Regulatory Environment
Funds provided under the federal student financial aid programs that have been created under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (the “Federal Higher Education Act”), historically have been responsible for a majority of the net revenues of Kaplan Higher Education. During 2010, funds received under Title IV programs accounted for approximately $1,460 million, or approximately 82%, of total Kaplan Higher Education revenues, and 50% of Kaplan, Inc. revenues. The Company estimates that funds received from students borrowing under third-party private loan programs comprised approximately 1% of its higher education net revenues. Beginning in 2008 and continuing through 2010, as the private loan market deteriorated, Kaplan Higher Education provided loans directly to some Kaplan students under a third-party institutional loan program. Lending under Kaplan’s institutional loan program totaled approximately 1% of its higher education net revenue in 2010. Direct student payments, funds received under various state and agency grant programs and corporate reimbursement under tuition assistance programs accounted for most of the remainder of 2010 Kaplan Higher Education revenues. The significant role of Title IV funding in the operations of Kaplan Higher Education is expected to continue.
The federal student financial aid programs created under Title IV of the Federal Higher Education Act (“Title IV programs”) encompass various forms of student loans and non-repayable grants. In some cases, the federal government subsidizes part of the interest expense of Title IV loans. Subsidized loans and grants are only available to students who can demonstrate financial need. During 2010, about 69% of the approximately $1,460 million of Title IV funds received by Kaplan Higher Education came from student loans, and approximately 31% of such funds came from grants.
2 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
Title IV Eligibility and Compliance With Title IV Program Requirements. To maintain eligibility to participate in Title IV programs, a school must comply with extensive statutory and regulatory requirements relating to its financial aid management, educational programs, financial strength, administrative capability, compensation practices, facilities, recruiting practices and various other matters. In addition, the school must be licensed or otherwise legally authorized to offer postsecondary educational programs by the appropriate governmental body in the state or states in which it is physically located, be accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education (the “Department of Education”) and be certified to participate in the Title IV programs by the Department of Education. Schools are required periodically to apply for renewal of their authorization, accreditation or certification with the applicable state governmental bodies, accrediting agencies and the Department of Education. In accordance with Department of Education regulations, some Kaplan Higher Education schools are combined into groups of two or more schools for the purpose of determining compliance with certain Title IV requirements, and each such group is assigned its own identification number, known as an OPEID number. As a result, the schools in Kaplan’s Higher Education division have a total of 33 OPEID numbers. No assurance can be given that the Kaplan schools, or individual programs within schools, will maintain their Title IV eligibility, accreditation and state authorization in the future or that the Department of Education might not successfully assert that one or more of such schools have previously failed to comply with Title IV requirements.
The Department of Education may place a school on provisional certification status under certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, failure to satisfy certain standards of financial responsibility or administrative capability or upon a change in ownership resulting in a change of control. Provisional certification status carries fewer due process protections than full certification. As a result, the Department of Education may withdraw an institution’s provisional certification more easily than if it were fully certified. In addition, the Department of Education may subject an institution on provisional certification status to greater scrutiny in some instances, for example, when it applies for approval to add a new location or program or makes another substantive change. Provisional certification does not otherwise limit access to Title IV program funds by students attending the institution. Currently, one Kaplan Higher Education reporting unit is provisionally certified.
In addition, the Department of Education may fine a school, require a school to repay Title IV program funds, limit or terminate a school’s eligibility to participate in the Title IV programs, initiate an emergency action to suspend the school’s participation in the Title IV programs without prior notice or opportunity for a hearing, transfer a school to a method of Title IV payment that would adversely affect the timing of the institution’s receipt of Title IV funds, deny or refuse to consider a school’s application for renewal of its certification to participate in the Title IV programs, refer a matter for possible civil or criminal investigation or take other enforcement measures if it finds that the school has failed to comply with Title IV requirements or improperly disbursed or retained Title IV program funds. There can be no assurance that the Department of Education will not take any of these actions in the future, whether as a result of a lawsuit, Program Review or otherwise. This list is not exclusive. There may be other actions the Department of Education may take and other legal theories under which a school could be sued as a result of alleged irregularities in the administration of student financial aid. See

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
The Company faces a number of significant risks and uncertainties in connection with its operations. The most significant of these are described below. These risks and uncertainties may not be the only ones facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known, or currently deemed immaterial, may adversely affect the Company in the future. In addition to the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, investors should carefully consider the following risk factors. If any of the events or developments described below occurs, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
•
Failure to Comply With Statutory and Regulatory Requirements Could Result in Loss of Access to U.S. Federal Student Loans and Grants Under Title IV, a Requirement to Pay Fines or Monetary Liabilities or Other Sanctions
To maintain Title IV eligibility, each group of schools combined into an OPEID unit must comply with the extensive statutory and regulatory requirements of the Federal Higher Education Act and other laws relating to its financial aid management, educational programs, financial strength, facilities, recruiting practices and various other matters. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in the loss or limitation of the eligibility of one or more of the Kaplan Higher Education schools to participate in Title IV programs, a requirement to pay fines or to repay Title IV program funds, a denial or refusal by the Department of Education to consider a school’s application for renewal of its certification to participate in the Title IV programs, civil or criminal penalties or other sanctions. No assurance can be given that the Kaplan schools currently participating in Title IV programs will maintain their Title IV eligibility, accreditation and state authorization in the future or that the Department of Education might not successfully assert that one or more of such schools have previously failed to comply with Title IV requirements. The loss of Title IV eligibility by either (1) the single OPEID unit that includes Kaplan University or (2) a combination of two or more other OPEID units would have a materially adverse effect on Kaplan’s operating results.
•
Program Reviews, Audits, Investigations and Other Reviews of Kaplan Higher Education Schools Could Result in Findings of Failure to Comply With Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
The Kaplan Higher Education division schools are subject to Program Reviews, audits, investigations and other compliance reviews conducted by various regulatory agencies and auditors, including, among others, the Department of Education, the Department of Education’s Office of the Inspector General, accrediting bodies and state and various other agencies, as well as annual audits by an independent certified public accountant of each OPEID unit’s compliance with Title IV statutory and regulatory requirements. These compliance reviews can result in findings of noncompliance with statutory and regulatory requirements that can, in turn, result in proceedings to impose fines, liabilities, civil or criminal penalties or other sanctions against the school, including loss or limitation of its eligibility to participate in Title IV programs. Certain Kaplan Higher Education division schools are the subject of ongoing compliance reviews and lawsuits related to their compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements and may be subject to future compliance reviews.
The Kaplan Higher Education division schools also may be subject to complaints and lawsuits by present or former students or employees or other persons related to compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements, that, if successful, could result in monetary liabilities or fines or other sanctions.
•
Reductions in the Amount of Funds Available to Students, Including Under the Federal Title IV Programs, in Kaplan’s Higher Education Schools, Changes in the Terms on Which Such Funds Are Made Available or Loss or Limitation of Eligibility to Receive Such Funds
During the Company’s 2010 fiscal year, funds provided under the student financial aid programs created under Title IV accounted for approximately $1,460 million of the net revenues of the schools in Kaplan Higher Education. Any legislative, regulatory or other development that has the effect of materially reducing the amount of Title IV financial assistance or other funds available to the students of those schools could have a material adverse effect on Kaplan’s business and operations. In addition, any development that has the effect of making the terms on which Title IV financial assistance or other funds are available to students of those schools materially less attractive could have a material adverse effect on Kaplan’s business and operations.
• Recent Regulatory Changes Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on Kaplan’s Business and Operations
The Department of Education published two Notices of Proposed Rulemaking in June and July 2010 that proposed new regulations related to 14 “program integrity” topics. The Department of Education published final regulations on October 29, 2010, addressing each of these topics with the exception of regulations imposing additional eligibility requirements on educational programs subject to the Department of Education requirement of preparing students for
2010 FORM 10-K 29
gainful employment in a recognized occupation. The topics covered in the final regulations published on October 29, 2010, with a general effective date of July 1, 2011, include, but are not limited to, the following:
•
Revisions to the incentive compensation rule (see separate risk factor discussed below);
•
Expansion of the notice and approval requirements for adding new academic programs and new reporting and disclosure requirements for academic programs;
•
Revision and expansion of the types of activities that are deemed a “substantial misrepresentation” and the ability of the Department of Education to enforce the provisions;
•
Requirement that states authorize institutions and set forth certain minimum requirements to obtain such authorizations;
•
Limiting agreements between related institutions;
•
Defining a “credit hour”;
•
Administration of ability-to-benefit examinations;
•
Student attendance requirements;
•
Proof of high school graduation;
•
Verification of information included on student aid applications;
•
Satisfactory academic progress;
•
Retaking coursework;
•
Return of Title IV funds; and
•
Disbursements of Title IV funds.
The implementation of the final regulations will require Kaplan to change its practices to comply with these requirements and could increase its administrative costs. The changes to its practices or its inability to comply with the final regulations on or after their effective date could have a material adverse effect on Kaplan’s business and results of operations.
•
Compliance With Recently Adopted Regulations Regarding Incentive Compensation May Make It Difficult for Kaplan to Attract Students and Retain Qualified Personnel
Under the incentive compensation rule, an institution participating in the Title IV programs may not provide any commission, bonus or other incentive payment based directly or indirectly on success in securing enrollments or financial aid to any person or entity engaged in any student recruiting or admission activities or in making decisions regarding the awarding of Title IV funds. The Department of Education’s current regulations establish 12 “safe harbors” identifying types of compensation that could be paid without violating the incentive compensation rule. On October 29, 2010, the Department of Education issued final rules, effective July 1, 2011, that amended the incentive compensation rule by, among other things, eliminating the 12 safe harbors (and thereby reducing the scope of permissible payments under the rule) and expanding the scope of payments and employees subject to the rule. The Department of Education has stated that it does not intend to provide private guidance regarding particular compensation structures in the future and will enforce the regulations as written. The Company cannot predict how the Department of Education will interpret and enforce the revised incentive compensation rule and is presently unable to predict with certainty which forms of compensation will be permitted under the rule, or the full effect the new rule will have on the results of the Kaplan Higher Education division. Kaplan Higher Education will have to modify some of its compensation practices as a result of the revisions to the incentive compensation rule. These changes to compensation arrangements for its personnel could adversely affect its ability to provide adequate incentives to promote superior job performance, may make it more difficult to attract students and retain qualified personnel and could have a material adverse effect on Kaplan’s business and results of operations.
•
Proposed Rulemaking by the Department of Education Regarding Gainful Employment Could Result in Regulatory Changes That Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on Kaplan’s Business and Operations
The Department of Education plans to issue final regulations in early 2011 that would impose additional eligibility requirements on educational programs that are subject to the requirement of preparing students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation. The Department of Education published proposed gainful employment regulations in the July 2010 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would require each educational program to comply with benchmarks based on (1) annual student loan repayment rates and (2) an annual student debt measure comparing the median annual student loan payment to average annual student earnings and to student’s discretionary income. The various measures would be calculated under complex formulas prescribed in the proposed regulations and would be based in part on data that is not
30 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
available to Kaplan’s schools. An educational program that fails to meet one or both benchmarks could lose its Title IV eligibility, be placed on restricted status, be required to provide annual employer affirmations that the program aligns with recognized occupations at their businesses and that there are projected job vacancies or expected demand for those occupations at those businesses, be subject to limits on enrollment of Title IV recipients, and/or be required to provide disclosures and warnings to current and prospective students that they may have difficulty repaying loans obtained for attending that program. An institution with one or more ineligible programs or programs on restricted status would be subject to provisional certification.
The Company cannot currently predict with reasonable accuracy the impact the proposed regulation would have on its program offerings if it were enacted in its current form, nor can it predict with reasonable accuracy the final form or impact of the final regulation. The proposed regulations are not final and remain subject to further review and change. However, the implementation of the regulation as proposed, or any other changes the Department of Education may implement, would require Kaplan to eliminate or limit enrollments in certain educational programs at some or all of its schools and would have a materially adverse effect on the rate at which students enroll in programs at its schools and on business and operations.
•
Congressional Examination of For-Profit Education Could Lead to Legislation or Other Governmental Action That May Materially and Adversely Affect Kaplan’s Business
There has been increased focus by the U.S. Congress in 2010 on the role that for-profit education institutions play in higher education, including regarding participation in Title IV programs and U.S. Department of Defense oversight of tuition assistance for military service members attending for-profit colleges. Since June 2010, the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee of the U.S. Senate (“HELP Committee”) has held hearings to examine the for-profit education sector. As part of the HELP Committee’s review, investigators from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) performed undercover tests at 15 for-profit higher education institutions, including 2 campuses of KHE. In August 2010, the GAO issued a report that was critical of the recruiting tactics at several schools, including the 2 Kaplan campuses. The GAO subsequently revised its report.
On August 5, 2010, the HELP Committee sent a document request to numerous for-profit schools, including Kaplan. The information requested covered a broad range of business activities, including detailed information relating to financial results, management, operations, personnel, recruiting, enrollment, graduation, student withdrawals, receipt of Title IV funds, accreditation, regulatory compliance and other items. The HELP Committee indicated that it is interested in investigating the receipt and use of federal student loan funds at for-profit higher education institutions and, potentially, proposing additional legislation related to the sector. Kaplan has completed its response to the document request; however, at this time, the Company cannot predict the ultimate impact that the investigation may have on Kaplan Higher Education, or the likelihood of or content of any future legislation.
Other committees of the U.S. Congress have also held hearings into, among other things, the standards and procedures of accrediting agencies, credit hours and program length, and the portion of federal student financial aid going to for-profit institutions. A number of legislators have variously requested the GAO to review and make recommendations regarding, among other things, recruitment practices; educational quality; student outcomes; the sufficiency of integrity safeguards against waste, fraud and abuse in Title IV programs; and the percentage of proprietary institutions’ revenue coming from Title IV and other federal funding sources. This increased activity may result in legislation, further rulemaking affecting participation in Title IV programs and other governmental actions. In addition, concerns generated by congressional or other activity, or media reports, may adversely affect enrollment in for-profit educational institutions.
Kaplan cannot predict the extent to which these activities could result in further investigations, legislation or rulemaking affecting its participation in Title IV programs, other governmental actions and/or actions by state agencies or legislators or by accreditors. If any laws or regulations are adopted that significantly limit Kaplan’s participation in Title IV programs or the amount of student financial aid for which Kaplan’s students are eligible, Kaplan’s results of operations and cash flows would be adversely and materially impacted.
•
Kaplan Commitment Is Expected to Materially Impact Operating Results
In the fourth quarter of 2010, Kaplan Higher Education phased in a new program, the Kaplan Commitment. Under this program, students of Kaplan University, Kaplan College and other KHE schools enroll in classes for several weeks and assess whether their educational experience meets their needs and expectations before incurring any significant financial obligation. Kaplan also conducts academic assessments to help determine whether students are likely to be successful in their chosen course of study. Students who choose to withdraw from the program during this time frame (“risk-free period”) and students who do not pass the academic evaluation do not have to pay for the coursework. In general, the risk-free period is approximately four weeks for diploma programs and five weeks for associate’s and bachelor’s degrees.
2010 FORM 10-K 31
This program and related initiatives are designed to benefit students and will likely have a significant impact on the future operations of Kaplan Higher Education, including student enrollment and retention, tuition revenues, operating income and cash flow. Based on historical student withdrawal and performance patterns and assuming students who withdrew during early academic terms would have instead availed themselves of the Kaplan Commitment, management estimates that Kaplan Higher Education revenues would have been approximately $140 million less in 2010 had the provisions of the Kaplan Commitment commenced on January 1, 2010. Kaplan is not able to estimate whether the Kaplan Commitment will cause student retention patterns to differ from historical levels. The Kaplan Commitment is expected to have a material impact on Kaplan’s operating results.
•
Student Loan Defaults Could Result in Loss of Eligibility to Participate in Title IV Programs
A school may lose its eligibility to participate in Title IV programs if student defaults on the repayment of Title IV loans exceed specified rates, referred to as “cohort default rates.” The Department of Education calculates a cohort default rate for each of Kaplan Higher Education’s OPEID numbers. The schools in an OPEID number whose cohort default rate exceeds 40% for any single year lose their eligibility to participate in the Federal Family Education Loan (“FFEL”) and Direct Loan programs effective 30 days after notification from the Department of Education and for at least two fiscal years, except in the event of a successful adjustment or appeal. The schools in an OPEID number whose cohort default rate equals or exceeds 25% for three consecutive years lose their Title IV eligibility to participate in FFEL, Direct Loan and Federal Pell Grant programs effective 30 days after notification from the Department of Education and for at least two fiscal years, except in the event of a successful adjustment or appeal. The schools in an OPEID number whose cohort default rate equals or exceeds 25% in any one of the three most recent fiscal years for which rates have been issued by the Department of Education may be placed on provisional certification by the Department of Education.
The two-year cohort default rate for Kaplan University (which comprises 52% of Kaplan Higher Educations’s revenue) for the federal fiscal year periods 2008, 2007 and 2006 were 17.2%, 13.3% and 9.2%, respectively. The cohort default rates for the remaining Kaplan Higher Education reporting units for those federal fiscal year periods ranged from 5.8% to 25.7%, 7.8% to 28.7%, and 2.1% to 24.9%, respectively.
For the 2008 cohort year, one reporting group had a cohort default rate of 25% or more, but none had two or more years above 25%. For the 2009 cohort year, which has been issued in draft form by the Department of Education, no reporting units had a cohort default rate greater than 25%. The Department of Education’s 2009 draft rates indicated that Kaplan University’s 2009 fiscal year cohort default rate was 17.5% and that the overall rates at Kaplan Higher Education’s reporting units range between 9.8% and 24.3%. The 2009 draft rates are not final and are subject to revision. The loss of Title IV eligibility by either (1) the single OPEID unit that includes Kaplan University or (2) a combination of two or more other OPEID units would have a material adverse effect on Kaplan’s operating results.
•
Loss of Eligibility to Participate in Title IV Programs If Title IV Revenues Exceed Federally-Set Percentage
Under regulations referred to as the 90/10 rule, a Kaplan Higher Education OPEID unit would lose its eligibility to participate in the Title IV programs for a period of at least two fiscal years if it derives more than 90% of its receipts from the Title IV programs for two consecutive fiscal years, commencing with the unit’s first fiscal year that ends after August 14, 2008. Any OPEID reporting unit with receipts from the Title IV programs exceeding 90% for a single fiscal year ending after August 14, 2008, would be placed on provisional certification and may be subject to other enforcement measures. The enactment of the Ensuring Continued Access to Student Loans Act of 2008 increased student loan limits and the maximum amount of Pell Grants, which could result in an increase in the percentage of KHE’s receipts from Title IV programs. The Higher Education Opportunity Act has provided temporary relief from the impact of the loan limit increases by excluding from the 90/10 rule calculation any amounts received between July 1, 2008, and June 30, 2011, that are attributable to the increased annual loan limits. Absent relief from the loan limit increases, Kaplan University would have a 90/10 ratio of 91.7%, and the remaining Kaplan Higher Education OPEID numbers would have 90/10 percentages ranging between 75.3% and 94.5%. The loss of Title IV eligibility by either (1) the single OPEID unit that includes Kaplan University or (2) a combination of two or more other OPEID units would have a materially adverse effect on Kaplan’s operating results.
•
Failure to Maintain Institutional Accreditation Could Lead to Loss of Ability to Participate in Title IV Programs
Kaplan Higher Education’s online university and all of its ground campuses are institutionally accredited by one or another of a number of national and regional accreditors recognized by the U.S. Department of Education. Accreditation by an accrediting agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education is required for an institution to become and remain eligible to participate in Title IV programs. The loss of accreditation would, among other things, render the affected Kaplan schools and programs ineligible to participate in Title IV programs and would have a material adverse effect on its business and operations.
32 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
•
Failure to Maintain State Authorizations Could Cause Loss of Ability to Operate and to Participate in Title IV Programs in Some States
Kaplan Higher Education’s ground campuses and online university are subject to state-level regulation and oversight by state licensing agencies, whose approval is necessary to allow an institution to operate and grant degrees or diplomas in the state. Institutions that participate in Title IV programs must be legally authorized to operate in the state in which the institution is physically located. The loss of such authorization would preclude the campuses or online university from offering postsecondary education and render students ineligible to participate in Title IV programs. Loss of authorization at those state campus locations, or, in states that require it, for Kaplan University online, could have a material adverse effect on Kaplan Higher Education’s business and operations.
Some states have sought to assert jurisdiction over online educational institutions that offer educational services to residents in the state or to institutions that advertise or recruit in the state, notwithstanding the lack of a physical location in the state. State regulatory requirements for online education vary among the states, are not well developed in many states, are imprecise or unclear in some states and are subject to change. If Kaplan Higher Education is found not to be in compliance with an applicable state regulation and a state seeks to restrict one or more of its business activities within its boundaries, it may not be able to recruit or enroll students in that state and may have to cease providing services and advertising in that state.
The Department of Education published new regulations on October 29, 2010, with an effective date of July 1, 2011, that expand the requirements for an institution to be considered legally authorized in the state in which it is physically located for Title IV purposes. In some cases, the regulations will require states to revise their current requirements and/or to license schools in order for institutions to be deemed legally authorized in those states and, in turn, to participate in the Title IV programs. If the states do not amend their requirements where necessary and if schools do not receive approvals where necessary that comply with these new requirements, then the institution could be deemed to lack the state authorization necessary to participate in the Title IV programs. However, under the final regulations, institutions unable to obtain state authorization in a state under the above requirements may request a one-year extension of the effective date of the regulation to July 1, 2012, and, if necessary, an additional one-year extension of the effective date to July 1, 2013. To receive an extension of the effective date, an institution must obtain from the state an explanation of how a one-year extension will permit the state to modify its procedures to comply with the regulations.
In addition, the new Department of Education rules also require institutions offering postsecondary education to students through distance education in a state in which the institution is not physically located or in which it is otherwise subject to state jurisdiction as determined by the state, to meet any state requirements for it to be legally offering postsecondary distance education in that state. The regulations require an institution to document upon request by the Department of Education that it has the applicable state approval. As a result, some of Kaplan Higher Education’s schools and distance education programs may be required to obtain additional or revised state authorizations. If Kaplan Higher Education is unable to obtain the required approvals, its students in the affected schools or programs may be unable to receive Title IV funds, which could have a material adverse effect on its business and operations.
•
Failure to Correctly Calculate or Timely Return Title IV Funds for Students Who Withdraw Prior to Completing Programs Could Result in a Requirement to Post a Letter of Credit or Other Sanctions
Department of Education regulations require schools participating in Title IV programs to calculate correctly and return on a timely basis unearned Title IV funds disbursed to students who withdraw from a program of study prior to completion. These funds must be returned in a timely manner, generally within 45 days of the date the school determines that the student has withdrawn. Under Department of Education regulations, failure to make timely returns of Title IV program funds for 5% or more of students sampled in a school’s annual compliance audit in either of its two most recently completed fiscal years could result in a requirement that the school post a letter of credit in an amount equal to 25% of its prior year returns of Title IV program funds. If unearned funds are not properly calculated and returned in a timely manner, an institution is also subject to monetary liabilities, fines or other sanctions. Six of the Kaplan Higher Education reporting units currently have letters of credit outstanding to the Department of Education as a result of this requirement, with a collective total face value of approximately $3.3 million. The requirement to post additional letters of credit or the imposition of other sanctions by the Department of Education would increase Kaplan’s regulatory compliance costs and could have a materially adverse effect on its business and operations.
•
Failure to Demonstrate “Financial Responsibility” Could Result in a Requirement to Submit Letters of Credit to the U.S. Department of Education, Loss of Eligibility to Participate in Title IV Programs, or Other Sanctions
An institution participating in the Title IV programs must comply with certain measures of financial responsibility under the Federal Higher Education Act and under Department of Education regulations. Among other things, the applicable
2010 FORM 10-K 33
regulations require an institution to achieve a composite score of at least 1.5, as calculated under Department of Education regulations, based on data in annual financial statements submitted to the Department of Education. If an institution fails to achieve a composite score of 1.5 or fails to comply with other financial responsibility standards, then the Department of Education may place conditions on the institution’s participation in the Title IV programs and may require the institution to submit to the Department of Education a letter of credit in an amount of at least 10% to 50% of the institution’s annual Title IV participation for its most recent fiscal year. The Department of Education has measured the compliance of Kaplan’s Higher Education division’s schools based on the composite score of the division. If one or more of the institutions in Kaplan’s Higher Education division fail to meet the composite score standard or any of the other financial responsibility standards, then those institutions may be required to post a letter of credit in favor of the Department of Education and possibly may be subject to other sanctions, including limitation or termination of their participation in Title IV programs. A requirement to post a letter of credit or the imposition of any one or more other sanctions by the Department of Education could have a material adverse effect on Kaplan’s results of operations.
•
Failure to Demonstrate “Administrative Capability” Could Result in Loss of Eligibility to Participate in Title IV Programs or Other Sanctions
Department of Education regulations specify extensive criteria that an institution must satisfy to establish that it has the required “administrative capability” to participate in Title IV programs. These criteria include, but are not limited to, requirements relating to the institution’s compliance with all applicable Title IV requirements; the institution’s administration of Title IV programs; the institution’s compliance with certain reporting, disclosure, and record keeping obligations; and the institution’s ability to maintain cohort default rates below prescribed thresholds. Failure to comply with these criteria could result in the loss or limitation of the eligibility of one or more of the schools in Kaplan’s Higher Education division to participate in the Title IV programs, a requirement to pay fines or to repay Title IV program funds, a denial or refusal by the Department of Education to consider a school’s application for renewal of its certification to participate in the Title IV programs, civil or criminal penalties or other sanctions. Any one or more of these actions by the Department of Education could have a material adverse effect on Kaplan’s results of operations.
•
Failure to Obtain Regulatory Approval of Transactions Involving a Change of Control May Result in Loss of Ability to Operate Schools or to Participate in Federal Student Financial Aid Programs.
If one or more of Kaplan Higher Education’s schools experiences a change of control under the standards of applicable state agencies, accrediting agencies or the Department of Education, the schools governed by such agencies must seek the approval of the relevant agencies. The failure of any of Kaplan Higher Education’s schools to reestablish its state authorization, accreditation or Department of Education certification following a change of control as defined by the applicable agency could result in a suspension of operating authority or suspension or loss of federal student financial aid funding, which could have a material adverse effect on Kaplan Higher Education’s student population and revenue.
•
Actions of Other Postsecondary Education Institutions May Negatively Influence the Regulatory Environment and Kaplan’s Reputation
The U.S. Senate HELP committee hearings, along with other recent investigations and lawsuits, have included allegations of, among other things, deceptive trade practices, false claims against the United States and non-compliance with state and U.S. Department of Education regulations. These allegations have attracted significant adverse media coverage. Allegations against the overall student lending and postsecondary education sectors may impact general public perceptions of educational institutions, including Kaplan, in a negative manner. Adverse media coverage regarding other educational institutions or regarding Kaplan directly could damage its reputation, reduce student demand for Kaplan programs, adversely impact its revenues and operating profit or result in increased regulatory scrutiny.
•
Changes in the Extent to Which Standardized Tests Are Used in the Admissions Process by Colleges or Graduate Schools
A substantial portion of Kaplan’s revenue is generated by Kaplan Text Preparation. The source of this income is fees charged for courses that prepare students for a broad range of admissions examinations that are required for admission to colleges and graduate schools. Historically, colleges and graduate schools have required standardized tests as part of the admissions process. There has been some movement away from this historical reliance on standardized admissions tests among a small number of colleges that have adopted “test-optional” admissions policies. Any significant reduction in the use of standardized tests in the college or graduate school admissions process could have an adverse effect on Kaplan’s operating results.
34 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
•
Changes in the Extent to Which Licensing and Proficiency Examinations Are Used to Qualify Individuals to Pursue Certain Careers
A substantial portion of Kaplan Test Preparation’s and Kaplan International’s revenue comes from preparing individuals for licensing or technical proficiency examinations in various fields. Any significant relaxation or elimination of licensing or technical proficiency requirements in those fields served by Kaplan Test Preparation’s and Kaplan International’s businesses could negatively impact Kaplan’s operating results.
•
Failure to Successfully Assimilate Acquired Businesses
The Company’s Kaplan subsidiary has historically been an active acquirer of businesses that provide educational services. Consistent with this historical trend, during 2010 Kaplan completed four acquisitions. Acquisitions involve various inherent risks and uncertainties, including difficulties in efficiently integrating the service offerings, accounting and other administrative systems of an acquired business; the challenges of assimilating and retaining key personnel; the consequences of diverting the attention of senior management from existing operations; the possibility that an acquired business does not meet or exceed the financial projections that supported the purchase price; and the possible failure of the due diligence process to identify significant business risks or undisclosed liabilities associated with the acquired business. A failure to effectively manage growth and integrate acquired businesses could have a material adverse effect on Kaplan’s operating results.
•
Difficulties of Managing Foreign Operations
Kaplan has operations and investments in a growing number of foreign countries, including Canada, Mexico, the U.K., Ireland, France, Israel, Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, India and China. Operating in foreign countries presents a number of inherent risks, including the difficulties of complying with unfamiliar laws and regulations, effectively managing and staffing foreign operations, successfully navigating local customs and practices, preparing for potential political and economic instability and adapting to currency exchange rate fluctuations. The failure to effectively manage these risks could have a material adverse effect on Kaplan’s operating results.
•
Changes in International Regulatory and Physical Environments Could Negatively Affect International Student Enrollments
A substantial portion of Kaplan International’s revenue comes from programs that prepare international students to study and travel to English-speaking countries, principally the U.S., the U.K., Australia, and Singapore. Any significant changes to the regulatory environment, or a natural disaster or pandemic, in either the students’ counties of origin or the countries to which they desire to travel or study, could negatively affect Kaplan’s ability to attract and retain such students, which could negatively impact Kaplan’s operating results. An example of this is the recent immigration regulatory changes in the U.K. which impose recruitment quotas and stringent progression criteria as requirements for the maintenance of certain overseas student recruitment licenses.
•
Negative Impact of the Recession, Particularly in the Specific Geographic Markets Served by the Company’s Publishing and Television Broadcasting Businesses
A significant portion of the Company’s revenues in its publishing and broadcasting businesses comes from advertising. The demand for advertising is sensitive to the overall level of economic activity, both nationally and locally. The recession reduced advertising expenditures of many of the Company’s advertisers, which has had a lingering negative impact on the operating results of the Company’s newspaper and television broadcasting businesses. A decline in general economic conditions in the United States may have a material adverse effect on the operating results of the Company’s businesses.
•
Changing Preferences of Readers or Viewers Away From Traditional Media Outlets
The rates that the Company’s print publishing and television broadcasting businesses can charge for advertising are directly related to the number of readers and viewers of its publications and broadcasts. There is tremendous competition for readers and viewers from other media. The Company’s publishing and television broadcasting businesses will be adversely affected to the extent that individuals decide to obtain news, entertainment, classified listings and local shopping information from Internet-based or other media to the exclusion of the Company’s websites, print publications and broadcasts.
•
Changing Perceptions About the Effectiveness of Publishing and Television Broadcasting in Delivering Advertising
Historically, newspaper publishing and television broadcasting have been viewed as cost-effective methods of delivering various forms of advertising. There can be no guarantee that this historical perception will guide future decisions on the
2010 FORM 10-K 35
part of advertisers. To the extent that advertisers shift advertising expenditures to other media outlets, the profitability of the Company’s publishing and television broadcasting businesses will suffer.
•
Increased Competition Resulting From Technological Innovations in News, Information and Video Programming Distribution Systems
The development of direct broadcast satellite systems has significantly increased the competition faced by the Company’s cable television systems. In addition, the continuing growth and technological expansion of Internet-based services has increased competitive pressure on the Company’s media businesses. The development and deployment of new technologies has the potential to negatively and dramatically affect the Company’s businesses in ways that cannot now be reliably predicted and that may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results.
•
Changes in the Nature and Extent of Government Regulations in the Case of Television Broadcasting, Cable Television and VoIP Services
The Company’s television broadcasting and cable television businesses operate in highly regulated environments. The Company’s VoIP services business also is subject to a growing degree of regulation. Complying with applicable regulations has significantly increased, and may continue to increase, the costs and reduced the revenues of these businesses. Changes in regulations have the potential to further negatively impact those businesses, not only by increasing compliance costs and reducing revenues through restrictions on certain types of advertising, limitations on pricing flexibility or other means, but also by possibly creating more favorable regulatory environments for the providers of competing services. More generally, all of the Company’s businesses could have their profitability or their competitive positions adversely affected by significant changes in applicable regulations.
•
Potential Liability for Patent Infringement in the Cable Industry
Providers of services similar to those offered by Cable ONE have been the target of patent infringement claims from time to time relating to such matters as cable system architecture, electronic program guides, cable modem technology and VoIP services. Although the Company cannot predict the impact at this time, if any such claims are successful, the outcome would likely affect Cable ONE and could have a material adverse effect on its operating results.
•
Changes in the Cost or Availability of Raw Materials, Particularly Newsprint
The Company’s newspaper publishing businesses collectively spend significant amounts each year on newsprint. Increases in the cost of newsprint or significant disruptions in the supply of newsprint could have a material adverse effect on the operating results of the Company’s newspaper publishing businesses.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
Not applicable.

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Item 2. Properties.
Directly or through subsidiaries, Kaplan owns a total of 10 properties: a 30,000-square-foot six-story building located at 131 West 56th Street in New York City, which serves as an educational center primarily for international students; a redeveloped 47,410-square-foot four-story brick building in Lincoln, NE, which is used by Kaplan University; a 4,000-square-foot office condominium in Chapel Hill, NC, which it utilizes for its Test Prep business; a 15,000-square-foot three- story building in Berkeley, CA, used for its Test Prep and English-language businesses; a 131,000-square-foot five-story brick building in Manchester, NH, used by Hesser College; a 25,000-square-foot building in Hammond, IN, used by Kaplan Career College (formerly Sawyer College); a 45,000-square-foot three-story brick building in Houston, TX, used by the Texas School of Business; a 34,000-square-foot building in London, U.K., which is used by Holborn College; a 25,000-square-foot one-story building in Omaha, NE, and an 18,000-square-foot building in Dayton, OH, which are both currently vacant and being marketed for sale. Kaplan, Inc. and Kaplan University maintain corporate offices, together with a data center, call center and employee-training facilities, in two 97,000-square-foot leased buildings located on adjacent lots in Fort Lauderdale, FL. Both of those leases will expire in 2017. In December 2009, Kaplan Higher Education entered into an agreement to lease 76,515 square feet of corporate office space to house its corporate headquarters in Chicago, IL. This lease will expire in 2022. In December 2008, Kaplan University entered into an agreement to lease a two-story, 124,500-square-foot building in Orlando, FL, to house an additional support center. In June 2009, Kaplan, Inc. and Kaplan Higher Education began sharing corporate office space in a 78,000-square-foot office building in Alpharetta, GA, under a lease that expires in 2019. In October 2009, Kaplan University entered into an agreement to lease 88,845 square feet of corporate office space in Plantation, FL. This lease expires in 2021 and includes an option to lease an additional 29,898 square feet. In December 2010, Kaplan, Inc. and its New York-based
36 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
Test Prep Business relocated from 888 7th Avenue and 1440 Broadway, respectively, to consolidated space at 395 Hudson Street, occupying two floors and approximately 159,540 square feet of space. Kaplan, Inc. is marketing the vacated space at 888 7th Avenue for sublease as the current lease will expire in 2017. Overseas, DBS’s facilities in Dublin, Ireland, are located in six buildings aggregating approximately 83,000 square feet of space that have been rented under leases expiring between 2016 and 2029. Kaplan Publishing has an office and distribution warehouse in Wokingham, Berkshire, U.K., of 25,000 square feet, under a lease expiring in 2016. Kaplan Financial’s largest leaseholds are office and instructional space in London of 33,000 square feet (which will expire in 2033), 21,000 square feet (which will expire in 2015) and 35,000 square feet (comprising six separate leases, which will expire in 2015); office and instructional space in Birmingham of 23,500 square feet (comprising two separate leases, which will expire in 2017); office and instructional space in Manchester of 26,000 square feet (comprising of five separate leases, which will expire in 2022); and office and instructional space in Wales of 34,000 square feet (on an open-ended lease with termination on 12 months’ notice). Kidum has 19 locations throughout Israel, all of which are occupied under leases expiring between 2010 and 2015. All other Kaplan facilities in the U.S. and overseas (including administrative offices and instructional locations) occupy leased premises.
The headquarters offices of Cable ONE are located in a three-story office building in Phoenix, AZ, that was purchased by Cable ONE in 1998. Cable ONE purchased an adjoining two-story office building in 2005; that building is currently leased to third-party tenants. The majority of the offices and head-end facilities of the division’s individual cable systems are located in buildings owned by Cable ONE. Most of the tower sites used by the division are leased. In addition, the division houses call-center operations in 60,000 square feet of rented space in Phoenix under a lease that will expire in 2013.
WP Company owns the principal offices of The Washington Post in downtown Washington, DC, including both a seven-story building in use since 1950 and a connected nine-story office building on contiguous property completed in 1972 in which the Company’s principal executive offices are located. WP Company also owns and occupies a small office building on L Street that is connected to the Post’s office building. Additionally, WP Company owns land on the corner of 15th and L Streets, NW, in Washington, DC, adjacent to the Post’s office building. This land is leased on a long-term basis to the owner of a multistory office building that was constructed on the site in 1982. WP Company rents one floor in this building, which it has subleased to a third party.
WP Company owns a printing plant in Fairfax County, VA, which was built in 1980 and expanded in 1998. That facility is located on 19 acres of land owned by WP Company. In July 2009, WP Company closed a printing plant and distribution facility in Prince George’s County, MD, that was built in 1998 on a 17-acre tract of land owned by WP Company. This property was sold in 2010.
The Daily Herald Company owns its plant and office building in Everett, WA; it also owns two warehouses and a small rental building adjacent to its plant, as well as a small office building in Lynnwood, WA.
Post-Newsweek Media, Inc. owns a two-story combination office building and printing plant on a seven-acre plot in Laurel, MD. Post-Newsweek Media, Inc. also owns a one-story brick building in St. Mary’s County used by editorial and sales staff and office space in Montgomery and Charles counties, MD. In addition to these owned properties, Post-Newsweek Media leases editorial and sales office space in Frederick, Carroll, Calvert and Prince George’s counties, MD, and Fairfax County, VA.
The headquarters offices of the Company’s broadcasting operations are located in Detroit, MI, in the same facilities that house the offices and studios of WDIV. That facility and those that house the operations of each of the Company’s other television stations are all owned by subsidiaries of the Company, as are the related tower sites (except in Houston, Orlando, Jacksonville and Miami, where the tower sites are 50% owned).
Robinson Terminal Warehouse Corporation owns two wharves and several warehouses in Alexandria, VA. These facilities are adjacent to the business district and occupy approximately 7 acres of land. Robinson also owns two partially developed tracts of land in Fairfax County, VA, aggregating about 20 acres. These tracts are near The Washington Post’s Virginia printing plant and include several warehouses. Robinson also owns 23 acres of undeveloped land on the Potomac River in Charles County, MD.
WP Company has assumed financial responsibility for the lease of approximately 85,000 square feet of office space in Arlington, VA, that will expire in 2015. The space has been subleased because the Washington Post Digital and Slate employees who worked there have been relocated to Washington, DC, following the integration of Washington Post Digital’s business into WP Company. In addition, WP Company leases space in New York City for certain Slate Group and corporate personnel, and digital and print sales representatives. WP Company also leases office space for sales representatives in Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. The Slate Group leases space in Washington, DC, for its staff in that city and additional space in Washington, DC, to house Foreign Policy magazine.
2010 FORM 10-K 37
Greater Washington Publishing’s offices are located in leased space in Vienna, VA, while El Tiempo Latino’s offices are located in leased space in Arlington, VA.
Avenue100 leases space in an office building in Woburn, MA. This lease expires in 2015.

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
A purported class action complaint was filed against the Company, Donald E. Graham and Hal S. Jones on October 28, 2010, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, by the Plumbers Local #200 Pension Fund. The complaint alleges that the Company and certain of its officers made materially false and misleading statements, or failed to disclose material facts relating to Kaplan Higher Education, in violation of the federal securities laws. The complaint seeks damages, attorneys’ fees, costs and equitable/injunctive relief. Based on an initial review of this complaint, the Company believes the complaint is without merit and intends to vigorously defend against it.
Kaplan, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, is a party to a previously disclosed class action antitrust lawsuit filed on April 29, 2005, by purchasers of BAR/BRI bar review courses from fall 1997 through July 2006, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The court approved a settlement of the case on July 9, 2007, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the approval of the settlement on April 23, 2009. Though the Ninth Circuit vacated the district court’s award of attorney’s fees to class counsel and counsel to various objectors to the settlement, and remanded to the U.S. District Court to consider the attorney’s fees issue anew, and though that issue continues to be litigated, the attorney’s fees award will be paid from the escrowed settlement funds so Kaplan does not anticipate that it will be affected by the ultimate determination of the attorney’s fees issue.
On February 6, 2008, Kaplan was served with another purported class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California alleging claims substantially similar to those alleged in the previously settled lawsuit but on behalf of a putative class that included all persons who purchased a bar review course from BAR/BRI in the United States after the July 2006 cut-off for class membership in the prior action. West Publishing Corporation, which owns BAR/BRI, is a co-defendant. On April 15, 2008, the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss. On May 20, 2008, the plaintiffs filed an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On October 18, 2010, the parties entered into a stipulation and settlement agreement, which requires court approval to become effective. In December 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit remanded the case to the District Court to consider approval of the settlement.
On April 29, 2009, Kaplan was served with a purported class action lawsuit by a purchaser of Kaplan’s LSAT preparation course, alleging that in 1997, BAR/BRI and Kaplan entered into a market allocation agreement in violation of U.S. antitrust laws. On March 12, 2010, the Court granted Kaplan’s Motion to Dismiss the case in its entirety and no appeal was filed.
On June 17, 2008, teachers at Kaplan Aspect, which is now operated within Kaplan International Colleges, filed a complaint in California Superior Court in San Francisco against Kaplan, Inc. and Aspect Education, Inc. alleging wage and hour violations on behalf of a putative class of California teachers. In January 2009, the parties reached an agreement to settle the claims in the action, as well as similar claims for a class of Kaplan Aspect teachers in states outside California. On August 19, 2010, the parties received final approval of the settlement of the California claims in the California Superior Court.
On or about January 17, 2008, an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania contacted Kaplan Higher Education’s CHI-Broomall campus and made inquiries about the Surgical Technology program, including the program’s eligibility for Title IV federal financial aid, the program’s student loan defaults, licensing and accreditation. Kaplan responded to the information requests and is fully cooperating with the inquiry. The U.S. Attorney has expressed concerns about the program’s historical sufficiency of externship sites, but has not concluded its inquiry. The U.S. Department of Education is also conducting a Program Review at the CHI-Broomall campus. CHI-Broomall and Kaplan have responded to a preliminary report issued by the Department of Education, have responded to a February 12, 2010, request by the Department of Education for additional information and are fully cooperating with its Program Review. Kaplan has not received a final Program Review report from the Department of Education. The U.S. Attorney’s Office has informed Kaplan Higher Education that it may make further information requests upon the completion of the Department of Education Program Review. At this time, Kaplan cannot predict the ultimate impact the Department of Education Program Review or U.S. Attorney’s inquiry may have.
Several Kaplan subsidiaries are also subject to four unsealed complaints that include, among other allegations, claims under the Federal False Claims Act (31U.S.C. § 3729, et seq.) relating to eligibility for Title IV funding. The U.S. Government declined to intervene in all four cases, which are captioned:
United States of America ex rel. Carlos Urquilla-Diaz et al. v. Kaplan University et al. (unsealed March 25, 2008); United States of America ex rel. Jorge Torres v. Kaplan Higher Education Corp. (unsealed April 7, 2008); United States
38 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
of America ex rel. Victoria Gatsiopoulos et al. v. ICM School of Business & Medical Careers et al. (unsealed September 2, 2008); and United States of America ex rel. Charles Jajdelski v. Kaplan Higher Education Corp. et al. (unsealed January 6, 2009).
The Diaz, Torres and Gatsiopoulos cases have been transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, where motions to dismiss have been filed in each case and await decision by the court. On December 22, 2010, the Court in the Southern District of Florida granted in part the motion to dismiss in the Gatsiopoulos case, with leave to file an amended pleading. The Court has not rendered decisions as to the other pending motions to dismiss. The Jajdelski case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, where a motion to dismiss was filed and awaits decision by the court. The Company will continue to vigorously defend each of these actions.
On August 5, 2010, Kaplan Higher Education Corporation, along with at least 28 other proprietary education organizations, received a letter of inquiry from the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. As part of a general Congressional review of the distribution of federal financial aid for students, the letter requested information and correspondence relating to the online and on-campus schools operated by Kaplan Higher Education. The requested information was provided to the Committee. Kaplan Higher Education may receive further requests for information from the Committee and intends to cooperate with its review.
On October 21, 2010, Kaplan Higher Education Corporation received a subpoena from the office of the Florida Attorney General. The subpoena sought information pertaining to the online and on-campus schools operated by Kaplan Higher Education in and outside of Florida. Kaplan Higher Education has been in discussions with the Florida Attorney General regarding the subpoena, for the purpose of determining which information would be responsive to the inquiry, as well as a reasonable timeframe for that information to be provided. Kaplan Higher Education expects these discussions to continue and will continue to provide responsive information in 2011. Kaplan Higher Education also may receive further requests for information from the Florida Attorney General. The Company cannot predict the outcome of this inquiry.
On December 21, 2010, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunities Commission filed suit against Kaplan Higher Education Corporation alleging racial bias by Kaplan in requesting credit scores of job applicants seeking financial positions. The Company will vigorously defend this action.
On February 7, 2011, Kaplan Higher Education Corporation received a Civil Investigative Demand from the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Illinois. The demand primarily seeks information pertaining to Kaplan University online students who are residents of the State of Illinois. Kaplan Higher Education is currently reviewing the demand and intends to cooperate with the inquiry. At this early stage, the Company cannot predict the outcome of this inquiry.
The Company and its subsidiaries are also subject to administrative proceedings and are defendants in various other civil lawsuits that have arisen in the ordinary course of their businesses, including contract disputes; actions alleging negligence, libel, invasion of privacy, trademark, copyright and patent infringement; False Claims Act violations; violations of applicable wage and hour laws; and claims involving current and former students and employees. While it is not possible to predict the outcomes of these lawsuits, in the opinion of management, their ultimate dispositions should not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business or financial condition.

---

ITEM 4. RESERVED
Item 4. Reserved.
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Market Information and Holders
The Company’s Class B Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “WPO.” The Company’s Class A Common Stock is not publicly traded.
The high and low sales prices of the Company’s Class B Common Stock during the last two years were:
2010 FORM 10-K 39
At January 31, 2011, there were 27 holders of record of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and 695 holders of record of the Company’s Class B Common Stock.
Dividend Information
Both classes of the Company’s Common Stock participate equally as to dividends. Quarterly dividends were paid at the rate of $2.25 and $2.15 per share during 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table and the footnote thereto set forth certain information as of January 2, 2011, concerning compensation plans of the Company under which equity securities of the Company are authorized to be issued.
This table does not include information relating to restricted stock grants awarded under The Washington Post Company Incentive Compensation Plan, which plan has been approved by the stockholders of the Company. At January 2, 2011, there were 8,855 shares of restricted stock outstanding under the 2007-2010 Award Cycle and 23,240 shares of restricted stock outstanding under the 2009-2012 Award Cycle that had been awarded to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries under that Plan. In addition, the Company has from time to time awarded special discretionary grants of restricted stock to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. At January 2, 2011, there were a total of 16,264 shares of restricted stock outstanding under special discretionary grants approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. At January 2, 2011, a total of 283,516 shares of restricted stock were available for future awards.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
During the quarter ended January 2, 2011, the Company purchased shares of its Class B Common Stock as set forth in the following table:
* On September 23, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the Company to purchase, on the open market or otherwise, up to 750,000 shares of its Class B Common Stock. There is no expiration date for that authorization. In the fourth quarter of 2010, 1,101 shares were purchased from recipients of vested awards of restricted shares at market price. Under the Company’s Incentive Compensation Plan, the Compensation Committee may permit the recipient of a vested award of restricted shares of the Company’s Class B Common Stock to receive some or all of the value of the award in cash rather than in shares. There were 1,101 share conversions of vested restricted shares into cash during the period covered by this table.
Performance Graph
The following graph is a comparison of the yearly percentage change in the Company’s cumulative total shareholder return with the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index, the Standard & Poor’s 1500 Publishing Index and a custom peer group index comprised of education companies. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index is comprised of 500 U.S. companies in the industrial, transportation, utilities and financial industries and is weighted by market capitalization. The Standard & Poor’s 1500 Publishing Index is comprised of Gannett Co., Inc., The McGraw-Hill Companies, The Meredith Corporation, The New York Times Company, The E.W. Scripps Company, Scholastic Corporation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and The Washington Post Company and also is weighted by market capitalization. The custom peer group of education companies includes American Public Education, Apollo Group Inc., Capella Education Co., Career Education Corp., Corinthian Colleges, Inc., DeVry Inc., Education Management Corp., ITT Educational Services Inc. and Strayer Education Inc. The Company is using a custom peer index of education companies because the Company is a diversified education and media company. Its largest and fastest growing business is Kaplan,
40 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
Inc., a leading global provider of educational services to individuals, schools and businesses. The graph reflects the investment of $100 on December 31, 2005, in the Company’s Class B Common Stock, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index, the Standard & Poor’s 1500 Publishing Index and the custom peer group index of education companies. For purposes of this graph, it has been assumed that dividends were reinvested on the date paid in the case of the Company and on a quarterly basis in the case of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, the Standard & Poor’s 1500 Publishing Index and the custom peer group index of education companies.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
See the information for the years 2006 through 2010 contained in the table titled “Ten-Year Summary of Selected Historical Financial Data,” which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and listed in the index to financial information on page 45 hereof (with only the information for such years to be deemed filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K).

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
See the information contained under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition,” which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and listed in the index to financial information on page 45 hereof.

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The Company is exposed to market risk in the normal course of its business due primarily to its ownership of marketable equity securities, which are subject to equity price risk; to its borrowing and cash-management activities, which are subject to interest rate risk; and to its foreign business operations, which are subject to foreign exchange rate risk. Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries is a party to any derivative financial instruments.
Equity Price Risk
The Company has common stock investments in two publicly traded companies (as discussed in Note F to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements) that are subject to market price volatility. The fair value of these common stock investments totaled $340,910,000 at January 2, 2011.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company’s long-term debt consists of $400,000,000 principal amount of 7.25% unsecured notes due February 1, 2019 (the “Notes”). At January 2, 2011, the aggregate fair value of the Notes, based upon quoted market prices, was $457,200,000. An increase in the market rate of interest applicable to the Notes would not increase the Company’s
2010 FORM 10-K 41
interest expense with respect to the Notes since the rate of interest the Company is required to pay on the Notes is fixed, but such an increase in rates would affect the fair value of the Notes. Assuming, hypothetically, that the market interest rate applicable to the Notes was 100 basis points higher than the Notes’ stated interest rate of 7.25%, the fair value of the Notes at January 2, 2011, would have been approximately $376,710,000. Conversely, if the market interest rate applicable to the Notes was 100 basis points lower than the Notes’ stated interest rate, the fair value of the Notes at such date would have been approximately $425,040,000.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk
The Company is exposed to foreign exchange rate risk at its Kaplan international operations, and the primary exposure relates to the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and both the British pound and the Australian dollar. This exposure includes British pound and Australian dollar denominated intercompany loans on U.S. based Kaplan entities with a functional currency in U.S. dollars. Gains and losses arising from foreign currency transactions affecting the Consolidated Statements of Operations have historically not been significant; however, unrealized foreign currency gains on inter- company loans of $6.7 million were recorded in 2010 arising from the overall weakening of the U.S dollar during the year. Comparing exchange rates in effect at December 31, 2010, versus December 31, 2009, the U.S. dollar weakened against the Australian dollar by approximately 14% and strengthened against the British pound by approximately 3%. In 2009, the Company reported unrealized foreign currency gains of $16.9 million as a result of the weakening of the U.S. dollar against the British pound and Australian dollar. In 2008, the Company reported unrealized foreign currency losses of $46.3 million as a result of the significant strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the British pound and the Australian dollar.
If the values of the British pound and the Australian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar had been 10% lower than the values that prevailed during 2010, the Company’s pre-tax income for fiscal 2010 would have been approximately $14 million lower. Conversely, if such values had been 10% greater, the Company’s reported pre-tax income for fiscal 2010 would have been approximately $14 million higher.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
See the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements at January 2, 2011, and for the periods then ended, together with the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP thereon and the information contained in Note S to said Consolidated Financial Statements titled “Summary of Quarterly Operating Results and Comprehensive Income (Unaudited),” which are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and listed in the index to financial information on page 45 hereof.

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
Not applicable.

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was performed by the Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (the Company’s principal executive officer) and the Company’s Senior Vice President-Finance (the Company’s principal financial officer), of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), as of January 2, 2011. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President-Finance have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as designed and implemented, are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President-Finance, in a manner that allows timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management’s report set forth on page 61 is incorporated herein by reference.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended January 2, 2011, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
42 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 9B. Other Information.
Not applicable.
PART III

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
The information contained under the heading “Executive Officers” in Item 1 hereof and the information contained under the headings “Nominees for Election by Class A Shareholders,” “Nominees for Election by Class B Shareholders,” “Audit Committee” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the definitive Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference thereto.
The Company has adopted codes of conduct that constitute “codes of ethics” as that term is defined in paragraph (b) of Item 406 of Regulation S-K and that apply to the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller and to any persons performing similar functions. Such codes of conduct are posted on the Company’s Internet website, the address of which is www.washpostco.com, and the Company intends to satisfy the disclosure requirements under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K with respect to certain amendments to, and waivers of the requirements of, the provisions of such codes of conduct applicable to the officers and persons referred to above by posting the required information on its Internet website.
In addition to the certifications of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, on June 18, 2010, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer submitted to the New York Stock Exchange the annual certification regarding compliance with the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards required by Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information contained under the headings “Director Compensation,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Executive Compensation” and “Compensation Committee Report” in the definitive Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The information contained under the heading “Stock Holdings of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the definitive Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence.
The information contained under the headings “Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Persons” and “Controlled Company” in the definitive Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
The information contained under the heading “Audit Committee Report” in the definitive Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference thereto.
PART IV

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1. Financial Statements
As listed in the index to financial information on page 45 hereof.
2. Exhibits
As listed in the index to exhibits on page 99 hereof.
2010 FORM 10-K 43
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 2, 2011.
THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
(Registrant)
By
/s/ Hal S. Jones
Hal S. Jones
Senior Vice President-Finance
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 2, 2011:
Donald E. Graham
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Director
Hal S. Jones
Senior Vice President--Finance (Principal
Financial Officer)
Wallace R. Cooney
Principal Accounting Officer
Lee C. Bollinger
Director
Warren E. Buffett
Director
Christopher C. Davis
Director
Barry Diller
Director
John L. Dotson Jr.
Director
Thomas S. Gayner
Director
Anne M. Mulcahy
Director
Ronald L. Olson
Director
G. Richard Wagoner, Jr.
Director
Katharine Weymouth
Director
By
/s/ Hal S. Jones
Hal S. Jones
Attorney-in-Fact
An original power of attorney authorizing Donald E. Graham, Hal S. Jones and Veronica Dillon, and each of them, to sign all reports required to be filed by the Registrant pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of the above-named directors and officers has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
44 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
INDEX TO FINANCIAL INFORMATION
THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition (Unaudited)
Financial Statements:
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Fiscal Years Ended January 2, 2011
Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Fiscal Years Ended January 2, 2011
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Common Shareholders’ Equity for the Three Fiscal Years Ended January 2,
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Ten-Year Summary of Selected Historical Financial Data (Unaudited)
All schedules have been omitted either because they are not applicable or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the notes thereto referred to above.
2010 FORM 10-K 45
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
This analysis should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto.
OVERVIEW
The Washington Post Company is a diversified education and media company, with education as the largest business. Through its subsidiary Kaplan, Inc., the Company provides educational services for individuals, schools and businesses. The Company also operates principally in three areas of the media business: cable television, newspaper publishing and television broadcasting. The Company’s business units are diverse and subject to different trends and risks.
The Company’s education division is the largest operating division of the Company, accounting for about 62% of the Company’s consolidated revenues in 2010. The Company has devoted significant resources and attention to this division, given the attractiveness of investment opportunities and growth prospects. The growth of Kaplan in recent years has come from both rapid internal growth and acquisitions. Kaplan is organized into the following four operating segments: Kaplan Higher Education (KHE), Test Preparation, Kaplan International and Kaplan Ventures.
KHE is the largest segment of Kaplan, representing 62% of total Kaplan revenues in 2010. KHE showed significant revenue growth in 2010; however, fourth quarter 2010 revenue was down by 3% compared to 2009 as enrollments declined. The KHE division showed strong operating income growth in 2010; however, operating income also declined in the fourth quarter of 2010. KHE businesses are subject to a number of recently enacted and pending regulations by the U.S. Department of Education, and Kaplan implemented a new program, the Kaplan Commitment, in the fourth quarter of 2010 that includes a “risk-free period” of enrollment. The recent and potential rulemaking activities and the Kaplan Commitment could have a material adverse effect on Kaplan’s future operating results. In the short term, the Company expects KHE’s operating income to be down very substantially in 2011.
Kaplan International also reported revenue growth for 2010, while the remaining segments reported revenue declines. Kaplan International results improved in 2010, primarily from enrollment growth in the pathway and other higher education programs in the U.K. and Singapore. Operating results for Kaplan’s Test Preparation division were adversely impacted by restructuring activity at K12, and at the traditional test prep centers, with the migration of students to online and hybrid test preparation offerings; these results were offset by improved results at its professional training businesses due to expense reductions. Kaplan Ventures’ losses increased primarily from increased investment at certain developing business units and the sale of a business.
Kaplan made four acquisitions in 2010, two acquisitions in 2009 and nine acquisitions in 2008. None of these was individually significant. Over the past several years, Kaplan’s revenues have grown rapidly, while operating income has fluctuated due largely to restructuring activities, various business investments and stock compensation charges.
The cable division has also been a source of recent growth and capital investment. Cable ONE’s industry has experienced significant technological changes that have created new revenue opportunities, such as digital television, broadband and, more recently, telephony and DVRs. Cable ONE has also experienced increased competition, particularly from satellite television service providers and, to a lesser extent, other telephony providers. Cable telephone subscribers and high-speed data subscribers grew by 40% and 8%, respectively, to approximately 153,000 and 425,400, respectively, at the end of 2010. The cable division’s basic subscriber base was down in 2010 (decrease of 20,600 subscribers to approximately 648,400 at the end of 2010). The cable division continues to provide monthly discounts for subscribers who take three offered services (video service, high-speed data service and telephony service). Promotional discounts are offered for new subscribers or existing subscribers adding new services.
The Company’s newspaper publishing and television broadcasting divisions derive revenue from advertising and, at the publishing units, circulation and subscriptions. The results of these divisions tend to fluctuate with the overall advertising cycle, among other business factors.
Like many other large metropolitan newspapers, The Washington Post has experienced a significant continued downward trend in print advertising revenue over the past several years, which moderated to a 6% decline in 2010. This follows a 23% print advertising decline at The Washington Post in 2009 and a 17% decline in 2008. Circulation volume also continued a downward trend, although revenues increased 4% due to home-delivery price increases. The Company’s online publishing activities at washingtonpost.com and The Slate Group reported a 14% revenue increase in 2010, following an 8% revenue decline in 2009. The Washington Post implemented many recent cost-saving initiatives, including a Voluntary Retirement Incentive Program in 2009, the July 2009 closing of the Post’s College Park, MD, printing plant and the integration of the print and online operations. These initiatives have resulted in significantly improved operating results for the newspaper publishing division in 2010.
The Company’s television broadcasting division reported a significant increase in revenues and a 72% increase in operating income in 2010 due to improved advertising demand in all markets and significant political and winter Olympics-related advertising.
The Company generates a significant amount of cash from its businesses that is used to support its operations, to pay down debt and to fund capital expenditures, share repurchases, dividends, acquisitions and other investments.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - 2010 COMPARED TO 2009
Net income available for common shares was $277.2 million ($31.04 per share) for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2011, up from net income available for common shares of $91.8 million ($9.78 per share) for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2010. Net income includes $28.8 million ($3.22 per share) and $45.1 million ($4.80 per share) in losses from discontinued operations for
46 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
fiscal year 2010 and 2009, respectively. Income from continuing operations available for common shares was $306.0 million ($34.26 per share) for fiscal year 2010, compared to $136.9 million ($14.58 per share) for fiscal year 2009. As a result of the Company’s share repurchases, there were fewer diluted average shares outstanding in 2010.
On September 30, 2010, the Company completed the sale of Newsweek. Consequently, the Company’s income from continuing operations excludes Newsweek results, which have been reclassified to discontinued operations.
Items included in the Company’s income from continuing operations for 2010:
•
A $20.4 million charge recorded at The Washington Post in connection with the withdrawal from a multiemployer pension plan (after-tax impact of $12.7 million, or $1.38 per share);
•
A $27.5 million goodwill and other long-lived assets impairment charge at the Company’s online lead generation business, included in other businesses (after-tax impact of $26.3 million, or $2.96 per share);
•
$31.2 million in severance and restructuring charges (after-tax impact of $19.3 million, or $2.31 per share); and
•
$6.7 million in non-operating unrealized foreign currency gains arising from the weakening of the U.S. dollar (after-tax impact of $4.2 million, or $0.47 per share).
Items included in the Company’s income from continuing operations for 2009:
•
$57.9 million in early retirement program expense at the newspaper publishing division (after-tax impact of $35.9 million, or $3.82 per share);
•
$33.2 million in restructuring charges related to Kaplan’s Score and Test Preparation operations (after-tax impact of $20.6 million, or $2.19 per share);
•
$33.8 million in accelerated depreciation at The Washington Post (after-tax impact of $21.0 million, or $2.23 per share);
•
A $25.4 million goodwill and other long-lived assets impairment charge related to Kaplan Ventures (after-tax impact of $18.8 million, or $2.00 per share);
•
A $29.0 million decline in equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates associated with impairment charges at two of the Company’s affiliates (after-tax impact of $18.8 million, or $2.00 per share); and
•
$16.9 million in non-operating unrealized foreign currency gains arising from the weakening of the U.S. dollar (after-tax impact of $10.3 million, or $1.10 per share).
Revenue for 2010 was $4,723.6 million, up 8% compared to revenue of $4,386.5 million in 2009. The increase is due to strong revenue growth at the education and television broadcasting divisions, and increased revenue at the cable television division. In 2010, education revenue increased 10%, advertising revenue increased 7%, circulation and subscriber revenue increased 1% and other revenue increased 4%. Revenue growth at Kaplan accounted for the increase in education revenue. The increase in advertising revenue is due to increased revenues at the television broadcasting division and increases in newspaper publishing online revenue, offset by declines in print advertising at The Washington Post. The increase in circulation and subscriber revenue is due to a 1% increase in subscriber revenue at the cable division and a 4% increase in circulation revenue at the Post.
Operating costs and expenses for the year increased 1% to $4,176.7 million in 2010, from $4,128.6 million in 2009. The increase is due to higher expenses at the education, cable television and television broadcasting divisions, offset by reduced costs at the newspaper publishing division.
Operating income for 2010 increased to $546.8 million, from $257.9 million in 2009, due to improved results at the education, newspaper publishing and television broadcasting divisions.
DIVISION RESULTS
Education Division. Education division revenue in 2010 increased to $2,901.8 million, a 10% increase from $2,636.6 million in 2009. Kaplan reported operating income of $330.9 million for 2010, compared to $194.8 million in 2009. Kaplan’s results for 2010 and 2009 were impacted by several charges or credits (discussed below).
A summary of Kaplan’s operating results for 2010 compared to 2009 is as follows:
KHE includes Kaplan’s domestic postsecondary education businesses, made up of fixed-facility colleges and online post-secondary and career programs. Higher education revenue and operating income grew in 2010 due to enrollment growth, improved student retention and increased margins during most of 2010. The increased operating results were offset by a $9.3 million charge for severance costs associated with a workforce reduction, increased regulatory compliance costs and the implementation of the Kaplan Commitment program (discussed below).
During the fourth quarter of 2010, KHE phased in a new program, the Kaplan Commitment. Under this program, new students of Kaplan University, Kaplan College and other KHE schools enroll in
2010 FORM 10-K 47
classes for several weeks and assess whether their educational experience meets their needs and expectations before incurring any significant financial obligation. Kaplan also conducts academic assessments to help determine whether students are likely to be successful in their chosen course of study. Students who choose to withdraw from the program during this time frame (“risk-free period”) and students who do not pass the academic evaluation do not have to pay for the coursework. In general, the risk-free period is approximately four weeks for diploma programs and five weeks for associate’s and bachelor’s degrees. Based on historical student withdrawal and performance patterns and assuming students who withdrew during early academic terms would have instead availed themselves of the Kaplan Commitment, management estimates that KHE revenues would have been approximately $140 million less in 2010 had the Kaplan Commitment commenced on January 1, 2010.
At December 31, 2010, about 2,200 students in attendance were within their respective risk-free periods, during which KHE does not recognize tuition revenue. For all students enrolled to date under the Kaplan Commitment program, the attrition rate during the entire risk-free period has been approximately 28%, a majority of which is due to Kaplan’s dismissal of students from the program because of the students’ lack of academic progress during the period. KHE revenues and operating results will continue to be impacted by the Kaplan Commitment, overall economic conditions and changes in regulations and business practices. Management is not yet able to estimate whether the Kaplan Commitment and these other factors will cause student retention patterns to differ from historical levels or whether additional students will be attracted to Kaplan as a result of the risk-free offering.
Total KHE enrollments (exclusive of students within the risk-free period) declined 8% compared to enrollments at December 31, 2009. A summary of KHE student enrollments at December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009, is as follows:
In response to the enacted and proposed regulations, KHE has proactively implemented a number of marketing and admission changes, the effect of which raises student selectivity. New student enrollments at KHE declined 47% in the fourth quarter of 2010 compared to the same period of 2009, mostly due to these marketing and admission changes, along with overall weaker demand. New student enrollments were also adversely impacted by the number of students that did not continue beyond the risk-free period (students that withdraw during the Kaplan Commitment period are not counted as official starts). Management believes that the impact of fewer new enrollments will be offset in part by improved student retention.
Kaplan University and KHE Campuses enrollments at December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009, by degree and certificate programs are as follows:
In October 2010, the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) released rules that address program integrity issues for post- secondary education institutions that participate in Title IV programs. The rules include, among other items, state approval processes, DOE program approval processes, revised standards governing the payment of incentive compensation to admissions and financial aid advisors, standards around misrepresentation and the definition of “credit hour.” The Company is taking steps to fully comply with these rules, but cannot currently predict the impact that these rules will have on its operations in the future and related operating results.
In July 2010, the DOE released a notice of proposed rulemaking addressing substantive measurements for whether an educational program leads to gainful employment in a recognized occupation for purposes of that program’s eligibility for Title IV funds. The proposed rulemaking addressing the definition of gainful employment includes provisions whereby students at a program level must demonstrate certain levels of student loan repayment and/or a program’s graduates must achieve certain debt-to-income ratios for the institution’s program to remain eligible for participation in the Title IV program. If a program fails to meet some or all of these proposed requirements, then the program’s eligibility to participate in the Title IV program may be restricted or lost entirely. Some of the data needed to compute program eligibility under this proposed regulation are not readily accessible to the institutions, but are compiled by the DOE.
The Company cannot currently predict with reasonable accuracy the impact the proposed regulation would have on its program offerings if it were enacted in its current form. However, the Company expects that this regulation, if enacted as proposed, would significantly impact Kaplan’s operating results as some or all institutions owned by Kaplan might be required to limit program offerings to ensure compliance with the restrictions of the proposed gainful employment rule. The Company has filed public comments related to the proposed rulemaking on gainful employment. The DOE has stated it plans to issue final rules in 2011 for an effective date on July 1, 2012. Refer to Item I, Item IA and Item 3 for additional information regarding the KHE Business, Risk Factors and Legal Proceedings.
Test Preparation includes Kaplan’s standardized test preparation and tutoring offerings, as well as the domestic professional training business, K12 and other businesses. In the first quarter of 2010, the Company discontinued certain offerings of the K12 business; $7.8
48 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
million in severance, asset write-offs and other closure costs were recorded in connection with this plan. In the fourth quarter of 2009, a $4.6 million charge was recorded for product development and other write-downs at the K12 business. In the fourth quarter of 2010, Kaplan Test Preparation announced a plan to reorganize its business consistent with the migration of students to Kaplan’s online and hybrid test preparation offerings. In conjunction with this plan, in the fourth quarter of 2010, Kaplan Test Preparation began to reduce the number of leased test preparation centers and incurred $10.4 million in costs, mostly comprised of charges related to early lease termination and property, plant and equipment write-downs. The plan is expected to be largely completed by the end of 2011, and the Company estimates that an additional $10.0 million in costs will be incurred.
Test Preparation revenue declined 4% in 2010; excluding acquisitions, Test Preparation revenue declined 8%, due mostly to the termination of certain K12 offerings. Revenue at the traditional test preparation programs in 2010 was essentially flat. Strong enrollment increases, particularly in the Pre-College and Nursing programs, were offset by reduced prices for many programs related to increased competition and increased demand for lower priced online test preparation offerings.
Test Preparation operating results were down in 2010 due to the termination of certain K12 offerings and $7.8 million in related closure costs in 2010, reduced prices at the traditional test preparation programs and higher spending to expand online offerings and innovate various programs, as well as $10.4 million in 2010 restructuring-related charges. The declines were offset by improved results at test preparation’s domestic professional training businesses due to expense reductions. In 2009, total restructuring-related expenses of $8.3 million were recorded in conjunction with the professional training businesses. Test preparation operating results in 2009 were also adversely affected by a $4.6 million charge at the K12 business for product development and other write-downs.
In March 2009, the Company approved a plan to close its Score tutoring centers. The Company recorded charges of $24.9 million in asset write-downs, lease terminations, severance and accelerated depreciation of fixed assets in the first half of 2009.
Kaplan International includes professional training and post- secondary education businesses outside the United States, as well as English-language programs. Kaplan International revenue increased 9% in 2010 and operating income rose 4% due to enrollment growth in the pathway and other higher education programs in the U.K. and Singapore. The rise in revenue is also due to increased English-language program revenue and favorable exchange rates in Australia and Singapore.
Kaplan Ventures is made up of a number of businesses in various stages of development that are managed separately from the other education businesses. Revenue at Kaplan Ventures declined 10% in 2010; this revenue comparison was adversely impacted by the April 2010 sale of a business unit within the division. Kaplan Ventures reported operating losses of $30.7 million in 2010, compared to operating losses of $16.4 million in 2009. The decline in results for 2010 is due to the sale of the above-noted business, decreased operating margins at several of Kaplan Ventures’ established businesses and increased investment in certain developing business units. A goodwill and other long-lived assets impairment charge of $25.4 million was recorded at Kaplan in the third quarter of 2009 related to certain Kaplan Ventures’ businesses, as the book value of these businesses exceeded their estimated fair value.
Corporate represents unallocated expenses of Kaplan, Inc.’s corporate office and other minor shared activities. Corporate expenses declined in 2010, due largely to the reversal of incentive compensation accruals.
Stock compensation relates to incentive compensation arising from equity awards under the Kaplan stock option plan. Kaplan recorded a stock compensation credit of $1.2 million in 2010, compared to stock compensation expense of $0.9 million in 2009. The stock compensation credit for 2010 relates to an estimated decline in the fair value of Kaplan common stock since the end of 2009.
Cable Television Division. Cable television division revenue of $759.9 million for 2010 represents a 1% increase from $750.4 million in 2009 due to continued growth of the division’s cable modem and telephone revenues.
Cable television division operating income in 2010 decreased to $163.9 million, from $169.1 million in 2009. The cable division’s operating results in 2009 included a $7.7 million gain arising from changes to the cable division retiree health care benefits program. Excluding this gain, the cable division’s operating income in 2010 increased due to the division’s revenue growth, offset by increased technical and sales costs. Operating margin at the cable television division was 22% in 2010 and 23% in 2009.
At December 31, 2010, Revenue Generating Units (RGUs) were up 4% from the prior year-end due to growth in high-speed data and telephony subscribers, offset by a decrease in basic and digital subscribers. A summary of RGUs is as follows:
RGUs include about 6,300 subscribers who receive free basic video service, primarily local governments, schools and other organizations as required by various franchise agreements.
Below are details of cable television division capital expenditures for 2010 and 2009 in the NCTA Standard Reporting Categories:
2010 FORM 10-K 49
Newspaper Publishing Division. For most of the newspaper division’s print publications, operating results in 2010 included 52 weeks, compared to 53 weeks in 2009. Newspaper publishing division revenue in 2010 increased slightly to $680.4 million, from $679.3 million in 2009. Print advertising revenue at The Washington Post in 2010 declined 6% to $297.9 million, from $317.0 million in 2009. The print revenue declines in 2010 are due to reductions in general, classified and retail advertising, along with one less week in 2010 versus 2009. Revenue generated by the Company’s newspaper online publishing activities at washingtonpost.com and Slate increased 14% to $113.0 million, from $99.6 million in 2009. Display online advertising revenue grew 18% in 2010, and online classified advertising revenue on washingtonpost.com increased slightly in 2010. Daily circulation at The Washington Post declined 7.5% and Sunday circulation declined 8.2% in 2010. For 2010, average daily circulation at the Post totaled 550,900 (unaudited) and average Sunday circulation totaled 763,100 (unaudited).
As previously disclosed, The Washington Post contributes to multi-employer plans on behalf of three union-represented employee groups. The Post has negotiated in collective bargaining the contractual right to withdraw from two of these plans; the right to withdraw from the CWA-ITU Negotiated Pension Plan (CWA-ITU Plan) was the subject of contract negotiations that reached an impasse. In July 2010, the Post notified the union and the CWA- ITU Plan of its unilateral withdrawal from the Plan, effective November 30, 2010. In connection with this action, The Washington Post recorded a $20.4 million charge based on an estimate of the withdrawal liability.
As previously reported, The Washington Post recorded early retirement program expense of $56.8 million in the second quarter of 2009, and Robinson Terminal Warehouse Corporation recorded early retirement program expense of $1.1 million in the third quarter of 2009. The costs of these early retirement programs are funded mostly from the assets of the Company’s pension plans. Also as previously reported, the Post closed a printing plant in July 2009 and consolidated its printing operations. The Post also completed the consolidation of certain other operations in Washington, DC, in the first quarter of 2010. In connection with these activities, accelerated depreciation of $33.8 million was recorded in 2009, along with $3.9 million in shutdown costs and lease losses. An additional $3.1 million loss on an office lease was recorded by the Company in the first quarter of 2010.
The newspaper division reported an operating loss of $9.8 million in 2010, compared to an operating loss of $163.5 million in 2009. Excluding the multiemployer pension plan charge, early retirement program expense and accelerated depreciation, operating results improved in 2010 due to expense reductions in payroll, newsprint, depreciation, bad debt and agency fees, and expense reductions at washingtonpost.com. Newsprint expense decreased 16% in 2010 due to a decline in newsprint consumption, offset by an increase in newsprint prices.
Television Broadcasting Division. Revenue for the television broadcasting division increased 25% to $342.2 million in 2010, from $272.7 million in 2009. Television broadcasting division operating income for 2010 increased 72% to $121.3 million, from $70.5 million in 2009.
The increase in revenue and operating income is due to improved advertising demand in all markets and most product categories, particularly automotive. The increased revenue and operating income also includes $4.7 million in incremental winter Olympics-related advertising at the Company’s NBC affiliates in the first quarter of 2010, and a $32.2 million increase in political advertising revenue for 2010. Operating margin at the television broadcasting division was 35% in 2010 and 26% in 2009.
Competitive market position remained strong for the Company’s television stations. KSAT in San Antonio, WPLG in Miami and WJXT in Jacksonville ranked number one in the November 2010 ratings period, Monday through Friday, sign-on to sign-off; WDIV in Detroit and WKMG in Orlando ranked second; and KPRC in Houston ranked third.
Other Businesses. Other businesses includes the operating results of Avenue100 Media Solutions and other small businesses. In the third quarter of 2010, a goodwill and other long-lived assets impairment charge of $27.5 million was recorded at Avenue100 Media Solutions, the Company’s digital marketing business that sources leads for academic institutions and recruiting organizations.
Corporate Office. Corporate office includes the expenses of the Company’s corporate office and the pension credit previously reported in the magazine publishing division (refer to Discontinued Operations discussion below). In the fourth quarter of 2010, certain Kaplan operations moved to the former Newsweek headquarters facility. In connection with this move, $11.5 million in lease termination and other charges were recorded by the corporate office.
Equity in Losses of Affiliates. The Company’s equity in losses of affiliates for 2010 was $4.1 million, compared to $29.4 million in losses for 2009. Results for 2009 included $29.0 million in write-downs at two of the Company’s affiliate investments; most of the loss related to an impairment charge recorded on the Company’s interest in Bowater Mersey Paper Company as a result of the challenging economic environment for newsprint producers in 2009.
The Company holds a 49% interest in Bowater Mersey Paper Company, a 16.5% interest in Classified Ventures, LLC and interests in several other affiliates.
Non-Operating Items. The Company recorded other non-operating income, net, of $8.7 million in 2010, compared to other non-operating income, net, of $13.2 million in 2009. The 2010 non-operating income, net, included $6.7 million in unrealized foreign currency gains and other items. The 2009 non-operating income, net, included $16.9 million in unrealized foreign currency gains, offset by $3.8 million in impairment write-downs on cost method investments and other items. As noted above, a large part of the Company’s non-operating income (expense) is from unrealized foreign currency gains or losses arising from the translation of British pound and Australian dollar denominated intercompany loans into U.S. dollars.
50 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
A summary of non-operating income (expense) for the years ended January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010 follows:
The Company incurred net interest expense of $27.9 million in 2010, compared to $29.0 million in 2009. At January 2, 2011, the Company had $399.7 million in borrowings outstanding at an average interest rate of 7.2%; at January 3, 2010, the Company had $399.3 million in borrowings outstanding at an average interest rate of 7.2%.
Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for income from continuing operations in 2010 was 41.4%. This effective tax rate was adversely impacted by $13.9 million in noncash valuation allowances provided against deferred state and local income tax benefits, net of U.S. Federal income taxes, and $9.1 million from nondeductible goodwill in connection with an impairment charge recorded in the third quarter of 2010; these items were offset by permanent U.S. Federal tax benefit items and tax benefits with respect to jurisdictions outside the United States.
The effective tax rate for income from continuing operations in 2009 was 35.9%. This effective tax rate was adversely impacted by $7.4 million in noncash valuation allowances provided against deferred state and local income tax benefits, net of U.S. Federal income taxes, and $3.3 million from nondeductible goodwill in connection with impairment charges recorded in 2009; these items were offset by favorable adjustments recorded for a reduction in state income taxes and for prior-year permanent U.S. Federal tax deductions.
Discontinued Operations. On September 30, 2010, the Company completed the sale of Newsweek. Consequently, the Company’s income from continuing operations excludes magazine publishing operations, which have been reclassified to discontinued operations, net of tax. Under the terms of the asset purchase agreement, The Washington Post Company retained the pension assets and liabilities, certain employee obligations arising prior to the sale and other items. A loss of $11.5 million from the Newsweek sale is included in discontinued operations.
Newsweek employees were participants in The Washington Post Company Retirement Plan, and Newsweek was historically allocated a net pension credit. Since this net pension credit will be included in income from continuing operations in the future, it has been excluded from the reclassification of Newsweek results to discontinued operations. The pension cost arising from early retirement programs at Newsweek, however, is included in discontinued operations.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - 2009 COMPARED TO 2008
Net income available for common shares was $91.8 million ($9.78 per share) for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2010, up from $64.8 million ($6.87 per share) for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2008. Net income includes $45.1 million ($4.80 per share) and $30.5 million ($3.24 per share) in losses from discontinued operations for fiscal year 2009 and 2008, respectively. Income from continuing operations available for common shares was $136.9 million ($14.58 per share) for fiscal year 2009, compared to $95.3 million for fiscal year 2008 ($10.11 per share).
Items included in the Company’s income from continuing operations in 2009:
•
$57.9 million in early retirement program expense at the newspaper division (after-tax impact of $35.9 million, or $3.82 per share);
•
$33.2 million in restructuring charges related to Kaplan’s Score and Test Preparation operations (after-tax impact of $20.6 million, or $2.19 per share);
•
$33.8 million in accelerated depreciation at The Washington Post (after-tax impact of $21.0 million, or $2.23 per share);
•
A $25.4 million goodwill and other long-lived assets impairment charge related to Kaplan Ventures (after-tax impact of $18.8 million, or $2.00 per share);
•
A $29.0 million decline in equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates associated with impairment charges at two of the Company’s affiliates (after-tax impact of $18.8 million, or $2.00 per share); and
•
$16.9 million in non-operating unrealized foreign currency gains arising from the weakening of the U.S. dollar (after-tax impact of $10.3 million, or $1.10 per share).
Items included in the Company’s results in 2008:
•
Goodwill, intangible assets and other impairment charges of $142.3 million at the Company’s online lead generation business, included in the other businesses and corporate office segment; at the Company’s community newspapers, The Herald and other operations, included in the newspaper publishing segment; and at two of the Company’s equity affiliates (after-tax impact of $115.7 million, or $12.35 per share);
•
Charges of $82.8 million related to early retirement program expense at The Washington Post newspaper and the corporate office (after-tax impact of $50.1 million, or $5.27 per share);
•
$22.3 million in accelerated depreciation related to the planned closing of The Washington Post’s College Park, MD, plant (after-tax impact of $13.9 million, or $1.48 per share);
•
Expenses and charges of $11.0 million (after-tax impact of $6.8 million, or $0.72 per share) in connection with the restructuring of Test Preparation’s professional training businesses;
•
Non-operating gains include $47.3 million from the sales of marketable equity securities (after-tax impact of $28.9 million, or $3.09 per share), offset by $46.3 million in non-operating unrealized foreign currency losses arising from the strengthening of the U.S. dollar (after-tax impact of $28.5 million, or $3.04 per share); and
•
Income tax expense of $9.5 million related to valuation allow- ances provided against certain state and local income tax benefits, net of U.S. Federal income tax benefits ($1.01 per share).
2010 FORM 10-K 51
Revenue for 2009 was $4,386.5 million, up 4% compared to revenue of $4,211.7 million in 2008. The increase is due primarily to strong revenue growth at the education division and increased revenue at the cable division, partially offset by revenue declines at the Company’s newspaper publishing and television broadcasting divisions. In 2009, education revenue increased 13%, advertising revenue decreased 18%, circulation and subscriber revenue increased 6% and other revenue increased 1%. Revenue growth at Kaplan accounted for the increase in education revenue. The decrease in advertising revenue is due to declines in print advertising at The Washington Post, as well as to declines in the television broadcasting divisions. The increase in circulation and subscriber revenue is due to a 5% increase in subscriber revenue at the cable division from continued revenue growth in all major product offerings and a 7% increase in circulation revenue at the Post.
Operating costs and expenses for the year increased 4% to $4,128.6 million, from $3,979.8 million in 2008. The increase is due to higher expenses from operating growth at Kaplan and Cable ONE, offset by reduced costs at the newspaper publishing division.
Operating income for 2009 increased to $257.9 million, from $231.9 million in 2008. Operating results were significantly impacted by the operating items described above. Excluding these items, results at the newspaper publishing and television broadcasting divisions were down, generally due to weakness in advertising demand, offset by improved results at the Company’s education and cable television divisions.
The Company’s 2009 operating income includes $8.1 million of net pension credits, compared to $25.7 million in 2008. These amounts exclude $57.9 million and $82.8 million in charges related to early retirement programs in 2009 and 2008, respectively.
DIVISION RESULTS
Education Division. Education division revenue in 2009 increased to $2,636.6 million, a 13% increase from $2,331.6 million in 2008. Kaplan reported operating income of $194.8 million for 2009, compared to $206.3 million in 2008. Kaplan’s results for 2009 and 2008 were impacted by several charges (discussed below).
A summary of Kaplan’s operating results for 2009 compared to 2008 is as follows:
KHE includes Kaplan’s domestic postsecondary education businesses, made up of fixed-facility colleges as well as online postsecondary and career programs. Higher education revenue grew by 33% for 2009 due mostly to strong enrollment growth. Operating income at KHE increased 60% in 2009 due to this strong enrollment growth, offset by increased marketing and advertising costs in the first quarter of 2009, including a $21.0 million national media campaign. At December 31, 2009, KHE’s enrollments totaled 104,900, a 32% increase compared to total enrollments of 79,800 at December 31, 2008. Enrollment growth was particularly strong at Kaplan University’s online offerings, which grew 47% in 2009. Beginning in 2008, KHE provided loans directly to some Kaplan students under an institutional loan program. Lending under Kaplan’s institutional loan program totaled approximately 1% of its higher education revenue in 2009.
Test Preparation includes Kaplan’s standardized test preparation and tutoring offerings, as well as the professional domestic training business, K12 and other businesses. Test Preparation revenue, excluding Score, declined 10% in 2009 due to continued revenue declines in the real estate and financial education businesses, declines at the traditional test preparation programs and softness in other programs. Test Preparation operating results, excluding Score, were also down in 2009 due to declines at the traditional test preparation programs and softness in other programs, along with a fourth quarter $4.6 million charge at the K12 business for product development and other write-downs. The declines were offset by improved results at Test Preparation’s professional domestic training businesses due to expense reductions.
At the end of March 2009, the Company approved a plan to offer tutoring services, previously provided at Score, in Kaplan test preparation centers. The plan was substantially completed by the end of the second quarter of 2009; 14 existing Score centers were converted into Kaplan test preparation centers, and the remaining 64 Score centers were closed. Score revenues declined to $8.6 million in 2009, from $28.7 million in 2008. Operating losses at Score increased to $36.8 million in 2009, inclusive of $24.9 million in restructuring-related charges, compared to $13.3 million in operating losses for 2008.
In 2007, Kaplan announced restructuring plans at its professional domestic training businesses that involved product changes and decentralization of certain operations, in addition to employee
52 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
terminations. These businesses are part of Kaplan’s Test Preparation division. In the fourth quarter of 2008, Kaplan expanded this restructuring to include additional operations. Total restructuring-related expenses of $8.3 million were recorded in 2009 related to lease termination costs, accelerated depreciation of fixed assets and severance costs, compared to $11.0 million in restructuring-related severance costs recorded in 2008.
Kaplan International includes professional training and post-secondary education businesses outside the United States, as well as English-language programs. Kaplan International revenue declined 1% in 2009. Excluding revenue from acquired businesses, Kaplan International revenue was down 6% in 2009. The decline for 2009 is primarily the result of unfavorable exchange rates in the U.K., Europe and Australia. These declines were offset by revenue growth at International’s Asian operations. Kaplan International operating income was down in 2009 largely due to weakness in the financial education programs in the U.K. and English-language programs, offset by improved operating results at International’s Asian operations.
Kaplan Ventures is made up of a number of businesses in various stages of development that are managed separately from the other education businesses. Revenue at Kaplan Ventures increased 4% in 2009. Kaplan Ventures reported operating losses of $16.4 million in 2009, compared to operating losses of $2.9 million in 2008, due primarily to increased losses at Kaplan Virtual Education, a developing group of online high school institutions. A goodwill and other long-lived assets impairment charge of $25.4 million was recorded at Kaplan in the third quarter of 2009 related to certain Kaplan Ventures’ businesses, as the book value of these businesses exceeded their estimated fair value.
Corporate represents unallocated expenses of Kaplan, Inc.’s corporate office and other minor activities. Corporate expenses in 2008 included expenses associated with the resignation of Kaplan’s former chief executive officer in 2008.
Stock compensation (charges) credits relate to incentive compensation arising from equity awards under the Kaplan stock option plan, which was established for certain members of Kaplan’s management. Kaplan recorded stock compensation expense of $0.9 million in 2009, compared to a stock compensation credit of $7.8 million in 2008. The stock compensation credit in 2008 relates primarily to the forfeiture of 21,526 Kaplan stock options due to the resignation noted above.
Cable Television Division. Cable television division revenue of $750.4 million for 2009 represents a 4% increase from $719.1 million in 2008. The 2009 revenue increase is due to continued growth in the division’s cable modem and telephone revenues and a $4 monthly rate increase for most basic subscribers in June 2009.
Cable television division operating income in 2009 increased 4% to $169.1 million, from $162.2 million in 2008. The cable division’s operating results in 2009 included a $7.7 million gain arising from changes to the cable division retiree health care benefits program. Excluding this gain, the cable division’s operating income in 2009 was even with 2008, as revenue increases were offset by increased programming, depreciation and general and administrative costs. Operating margin at the cable television division was 23% in 2009 and 2008.
Revenue generating units (RGUs) were even with the prior year-end due to a reduction in basic and digital subscribers, offset by continued growth in high-speed data and telephony subscribers. A summary of RGUs is as follows:
RGUs include about 6,300 subscribers who receive free basic video service, primarily local governments, schools and other organizations as required by various franchise agreements.
Below are details of cable television division capital expenditures for 2009 and 2008 in the NCTA Standard Reporting Categories:
Newspaper Publishing Division. For most of the newspaper divisions’s print publications, 2009 included 53 weeks compared to 52 weeks in 2008. Newspaper publishing division revenue in 2009 decreased 15% to $679.3 million, from $801.3 million in 2008. Print advertising revenue at the Post in 2009 declined 23% to $317.0 million, from $410.4 million in 2008. The print revenue decline in 2009 is from large decreases in classified, zones and retail advertising. Revenue generated by the Company’s newspaper online publishing activities, primarily washingtonpost.com, declined 8% to $99.6 million, from $108.3 million in 2008. Display online advertising revenue grew 2% in 2009 and online classified advertising revenue on washingtonpost.com declined 24%. Daily circulation at the Post declined 5.9% and Sunday circulation declined 4.7% in 2009; average daily circulation at the Post totaled 595,800 (unaudited) and average Sunday circulation totaled 831,300 (unaudited).
The Company offered a Voluntary Retirement Incentive Program to certain employees of The Washington Post newspaper in the first quarter of 2009. A total of 221 employees accepted the offer, and early retirement program expense of $56.8 million was recorded in the second quarter of 2009, which is being funded primarily from the assets of the Company’s pension plans. In the third quarter of 2009, the Company offered a Voluntary Retirement Incentive Program to certain employees at Robinson Terminal Warehouse Corporation, and $1.1 million in early retirement program expense was recorded, also to be funded from the assets of the Company’s pension plans. In the first quarter of 2008, a Voluntary Retirement Incentive Program was offered at The Washington Post, with 231
2010 FORM 10-K 53
employees accepting the offer; $79.8 million in early retirement program expense was recorded in the second quarter of 2008, also funded primarily from the assets of the Company’s pension plans.
The Post closed its College Park, MD, printing plant in July 2009 and consolidated its printing operations in Springfield, VA. The Post is also in the process of consolidating certain other operations in Washington, DC. In connection with these activities, accelerated depreciation of $33.8 million and $22.3 million was recorded in 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Post incurred additional costs related to the shutdown of the College Park, MD, printing plant of $1.7 million in 2009. In the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a $2.2 million loss on an office lease in conjunction with the consolidation of operations. Also in 2008, as a result of the challenging advertising environment at the Company’s community newspapers, The Herald and other operations included in the newspaper publishing division, the Company recorded goodwill impairment charges of $65.8 million.
The newspaper division reported an operating loss of $163.5 million in 2009, compared to an operating loss of $192.7 million in 2008. Excluding early retirement program charges, accelerated depreciation and goodwill impairment losses, operating results declined in 2009 due to the significant decline in division advertising revenue, offset by expense reductions and a 19% reduction in newsprint expense due to a decline in newsprint consumption and prices.
Television Broadcasting Division. Revenue for the television broadcasting division decreased 16% to $272.7 million in 2009, from $325.1 million in 2008. The decrease in revenue is due to weaker advertising demand in most markets and product categories, particularly automotive, and a $19.4 million decrease in political advertising revenue in 2009. Additionally, in the third quarter of 2008, the television broadcasting division benefited from $6.3 million in incremental summer Olympics-related advertising at the Company’s NBC affiliates.
In 2008, the television broadcasting division recorded $6.9 million in noncash property, plant and equipment gains as a reduction to expense due to new digital equipment received at no cost from Sprint/Nextel in connection with an FCC mandate reallocating a portion of the broadcast spectrum.
Television broadcasting division operating income for 2009 declined 43% to $70.5 million, from $123.5 million in 2008. The operating income decline for 2009 is due to the revenue decreases discussed above and the noncash gains in 2008. Operating margin at the television broadcasting division was 26% in 2009 and 38% in 2008.
Competitive market position remained strong for the Company’s television stations. KSAT in San Antonio, WPLG in Miami and WJXT in Jacksonville ranked number one in the November 2009 ratings period, Monday through Friday, sign-on to sign-off; WDIV in Detroit and WKMG in Orlando ranked second; and KPRC in Houston ranked third.
Other Businesses. Other businesses includes the operating results of Avenue100 Media Solutions and other small businesses. In the fourth quarter of 2008, a goodwill and other intangible assets impairment charge of $69.7 million was recorded to write down the intangible assets of Avenue100 Media Solutions to their estimated fair values.
Corporate Office. Corporate office includes the expenses of the Company’s corporate office and the pension credit previously reported in the magazine publishing division (refer to Discontinued Operations discussion below). The 2008 results include $3.0 million in early retirement program expense at the corporate office.
Equity in Losses of Affiliates. The Company’s equity in losses of affiliates for 2009 was $29.4 million, compared to $7.8 million in losses for 2008. Results for 2009 included $29.0 million in write-downs at two of the Company’s affiliate investments. Most of the loss relates to an impairment charge recorded on the Company’s interest in Bowater Mersey Paper Company as a result of the challenging economic environment for newsprint producers. Results in 2008 include $6.8 million in impairment charges at two of the Company’s affiliates.
At the end of 2009, the Company held a 49% interest in Bowater Mersey Paper Company and interests in several other affiliates.
Non-Operating Items. The Company recorded other non-operating income, net, of $13.2 million in 2009, compared to other non- operating expense, net, of $2.2 million in 2008. The 2009 non-operating income, net, primarily included $16.9 million in unrealized foreign currency gains, offset by $3.8 million in impairment write-downs on cost method investments. The 2008 non-operating expense, net, primarily consisted of $46.3 million in unrealized foreign currency losses, offset by $47.3 million in gains from sales of marketable equity securities.
As noted above, a large part of the Company’s non-operating income (expense) is from unrealized foreign currency gains or losses arising from the translation of British pound and Australian dollar denominated intercompany loans into U.S. dollars. The unrealized foreign currency gains in 2009 were the result of a weakening of the U.S. dollar against the British pound and the Australian dollar in 2009, versus the exchange rates in effect at the end of 2008. The unrealized foreign currency losses in 2008 were the result of a strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the British pound and the Australian dollar in 2008, versus the exchange rates in effect at the end of 2007.
A summary of non-operating income (expense) for the years ended January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008 follows:
The Company incurred net interest expense of $29.0 million in 2009, compared to $19.0 million in 2008. The increase is due to
54 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
higher average interest rates in 2009 compared to 2008, as well as a decline in interest income. At January 3, 2010, the Company had $399.3 million in borrowings outstanding at an average interest rate of 7.2%; at December 28, 2008, the Company had $553.8 million in borrowings outstanding at an average interest rate of 4.1%.
Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for income from continuing operations in 2009 was 35.9%. This effective tax rate was adversely impacted by $7.4 million in noncash valuation allowances provided against deferred state and local income tax benefits, net of U.S. Federal income taxes, and $3.3 million from nondeductible goodwill in connection with impairment charges recorded in 2009; these items were offset by favorable adjustments recorded for a reduction in state income taxes and for prior-year permanent U.S. Federal tax deductions.
The effective tax rate for 2008 was 52.5%. This high effective tax rate was due to $31.1 million from nondeductible goodwill in connection with impairment charges recorded in 2008 and $9.5 million in noncash valuation allowances provided against deferred state and local income tax benefits, net of U.S. Federal income taxes; these were offset by a favorable $4.6 million provision to return adjustment from 2007.
Discontinued Operations. In connection with the 2010 sale of Newsweek, the Company’s income from continuing operations for 2009 and 2008 excludes magazine publishing operations, which have been reclassified to discontinued operations, net of tax. Newsweek employees were participants in The Washington Post Company Retirement Plan, and Newsweek was historically allocated a net pension credit. The magazine publishing division pension credit has been excluded from the reclassification of Newsweek results to discontinued operations. The pension cost arising from early retirement programs at Newsweek, however, is included in discontinued operations.
FINANCIAL CONDITION: CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Acquisitions and Dispositions. The Company completed business acquisitions totaling approximately $14.1 million in 2010, $26.1 million in 2009 and $123.5 million in 2008. The assets and liabilities of the companies acquired have been recorded at their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition; the purchase price allocations mostly comprised goodwill and other intangible assets, and property, plant and equipment.
During 2010, the Company acquired six businesses for $14.1 million. Kaplan acquired two small businesses in its Test Preparation division, one small business in its Ventures division and one small business in its International division. The Company made two small acquisitions in its Cable and Other Businesses divisions. The purchase price allocations for these acquisitions mostly comprised goodwill and other intangible assets.
On September 30, 2010, the Company completed the sale of Newsweek. In December 2009, the Company completed the sale of Newsweek’s Budget Travel. Consequently, the Company’s income from continuing operations excludes magazine publishing division results, which have been reclassified to discontinued operations.
In the second quarter of 2010, Kaplan completed the sale of Education Connection, which was part of the Kaplan Ventures division.
During 2009, the Company acquired three businesses for $22.9 million. Kaplan acquired one business in each of its International and Test Preparation divisions, and the newspaper division acquired a small local publication. The purchase price allocations for these acquisitions mostly comprised goodwill and other intangible assets. Also in 2009, the Company recorded $3.2 million of additional purchase consideration in connection with the achievement of certain operating results by a company acquired in 2007 and allocated the additional purchase consideration to goodwill.
During 2008, the Company acquired ten businesses within its education and newspaper segments, for a total of $93.1 million, financed with cash and $3.2 million in debt. Kaplan acquired nine businesses in its International, Test Preparation and Ventures divisions. In November 2008, Kaplan International exercised an option to acquire an 85% majority interest in Shanghai Kai Bo Education Management Investment Co., Ltd. (“Kaplan China”), a provider of education in China that offers preparation courses for entry to U.K. universities. Kaplan China’s results from the transaction date forward are included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. The purchase price allocations for these acquisitions mostly comprised goodwill and other intangible assets.
Also in 2008, the cable television division acquired subscribers primarily in the Mississippi area for $15.3 million. The purchase price allocations for these transactions mostly comprised intangible assets and property, plant and equipment.
During 2008, the Company recorded $15.1 million of additional purchase consideration in connection with the achievement of certain operating results by a company acquired in 2007 and allocated the additional purchase consideration to goodwill.
Capital Expenditures. During 2010, the Company’s capital expenditures totaled $243.7 million. The Company’s capital expenditures for businesses included in continuing operations for 2010, 2009 and 2008 are disclosed in Note R to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company estimates that its capital expenditures will be in the range of $260 million to $295 million in 2011.
Investments in Marketable Equity Securities. At January 2, 2011, the fair value of the Company’s investments in marketable equity securities was $340.9 million, which includes $300.7 million in Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class A and B common stock and $40.2 million in the common stock of Corinthian Colleges, Inc., a publicly traded education company.
At January 2, 2011, and January 3, 2010, the gross unrealized gain related to the Company’s Berkshire stock investment totaled $143.4 million and $90.2 million, respectively. During 2009, the Company invested $10.8 million in the Class B common stock of Berkshire. During 2008, the Company sold 420 and 5,975 shares of Berkshire Class A and Class B common stock, respectively. Total proceeds from the sale were $64.4 million, and the net realized gains were $26.0 million.
2010 FORM 10-K 55
The gross unrealized (loss) gain related to the Company’s investment in Corinthian Colleges, Inc. totaled $(25.5) million and $40.6 million at January 2, 2011, and January 3, 2010, respectively. At January 2, 2011, the investment has been in an unrealized loss position for under six months. The Company evaluated this investment for other-than-temporary impairment based on various factors, including the duration and severity of the unrealized loss, the reason for the decline in value and the potential recovery period, and the Company’s ability and intent to hold the investment and concluded that the unrealized loss is not other-than-temporary as of January 2, 2011. The Company will continue to monitor this investment in the future for a possible write-down charge to the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Common Stock Repurchases and Dividend Rate. During 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company purchased a total of 1,057,940, 145,040 and 167,642 shares, respectively, of its Class B common stock at a cost of approximately $404.8 million, $61.0 million and $99.0 million, respectively. In September 2010, the Board of Directors increased the authorization to repurchase a total of 750,000 shares of Class B common stock. The Company did not announce a ceiling price or a time limit for the purchases. The authorization included 16,312 shares that remained under the previous authorization. At January 2, 2011, the Company had authorization from the Board of Directors to purchase up to 431,995 shares of Class B common stock. The annual dividend rate for 2011 was increased to $9.40 per share, from $9.00 per share in 2010 and from $8.60 per share in 2009.
Liquidity. During 2010, the Company’s borrowings, net of repayments, increased by $0.4 million, and the Company’s cash and cash equivalents decreased by $4.8 million.
At January 2, 2011, the Company had $437.7 million in cash and cash equivalents, compared to $442.6 million at January 3, 2010. As of January 2, 2011, and January 3, 2010, the Company had money market investments of $308.9 million and $327.8 million, respectively, that are classified as cash and cash equivalents in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
At January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010, the Company had borrowings outstanding of $399.7 million and $399.3 million, respectively. The Company’s borrowings are mostly from $400.0 million of 7.25% unsecured notes due February 1, 2019; the interest is payable semiannually on February 1 and August 1. There were no commercial paper borrowings outstanding at January 2, 2011 or January 3, 2010.
The Company has a $500 million revolving credit facility that expires in August 2011, which supports the issuance of the Company’s short-term commercial paper and provides for general corporate purposes. The Company did not borrow funds under its commercial paper program or its revolving credit facility in 2010. The Company expects to replace the revolving credit facility with a new revolving credit facility in 2011.
In August 2010, Standard & Poor’s revised the Company’s long-term outlook to negative from stable; the Company’s “A” long-term corporate credit and senior unsecured ratings and “A-1” short-term commercial rating remained unchanged. Moody’s lowered the Company’s long-term rating in October 2010 to “A2” from “A1,” confirmed the “Prime-1” commercial paper rating and changed the ratings outlook to negative. The Company’s current credit ratings are as follows:
During 2010 and 2009, the Company had average borrowings outstanding of approximately $399.5 million and $426.7 million, respectively, at average annual interest rates of approximately 7.2% and 6.9%, respectively. The Company incurred net interest expense of $27.9 million and $29.0 million, respectively, during 2010 and 2009.
At January 2, 2011, and January 3, 2010, the Company had working capital of $353.6 million and $398.5 million, respectively. The Company maintains working capital levels consistent with its underlying business requirements and consistently generates cash from operations in excess of required interest or principal payments.
The Company’s net cash provided by operating activities, as reported in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, was $693.7 million in 2010, compared to $651.4 million in 2009.
The Company expects to fund its estimated capital needs primarily through existing cash balances and internally generated funds and, to a lesser extent, through commercial paper borrowings. In management’s opinion, the Company will have ample liquidity to meet its various cash needs in 2011.
The following reflects a summary of the Company’s contractual obligations as of January 2, 2011:
(1) Includes commitments for the Company’s television broadcasting and cable television businesses that are reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and commitments to purchase programming to be produced in future years.
(2) Includes purchase obligations related to newsprint contracts, printing contracts, employment agreements, circulation distribution agreements, capital projects and other legally binding commitments. Other purchase orders made in the ordinary course of business are excluded from the table above. Any amounts for which the Company is liable under purchase orders are reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
(3) Primarily made up of postretirement benefit obligations other than pensions. The Company has other long-term liabilities excluded from the table above, including obligations for deferred compensation, long-term incentive plans and long-term deferred revenue.
56 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
Other. The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet arrangements or financing activities with special-purpose entities (SPEs). Transactions with related parties, as discussed in Note F to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, are in the ordinary course of business and are conducted on an arm’s-length basis.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it is important to the Company’s financial condition and results and if it requires management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments in its application. For a summary of all of the Company’s significant accounting policies, see Note B to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenue Recognition, Trade Accounts Receivable, Sales Returns and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. Education tuition revenue is recognized ratably over the period of instruction as services are delivered to students, net of any refunds, corporate discounts, scholarships and employee tuition discounts.
During the fourth quarter of 2010, KHE phased in a new program, the Kaplan Commitment. Under this program, new students of Kaplan University, Kaplan College and other KHE schools enroll in classes for several weeks and assess whether their educational experience meets their needs and expectations before incurring any significant financial obligation. Kaplan also conducts academic assessments to help determine whether students are likely to be successful in their chosen course of study. Students who choose to withdraw from the program during this time frame (“risk-free period”) and students who do not pass the academic evaluation do not have to pay for the coursework. In general, the risk-free period is approximately four weeks for diploma programs and five weeks for associate’s and bachelor’s degrees. The Company does not recognize revenues related to coursework until the students complete the risk-free period, meet the academic requirements and decide to continue with their studies, at which time the fees become fixed and determinable. In 2009, KHE modified its method of recognizing revenue ratably over the period of instruction as services are delivered to students from a weekly convention to a daily convention, on a prospective basis.
At Kaplan’s Test Preparation and International divisions, estimates of average student course length are developed for each course, along with estimates for the anticipated level of student drops and refunds from test performance guarantees, and these estimates are evaluated on an ongoing basis and adjusted as necessary. As Kaplan’s businesses and related course offerings have expanded, including online programs, the complexity and significance of management’s estimates have increased.
Revenue from media advertising is recognized, net of agency commissions, when the underlying advertisement is published or broadcast. Revenues from newspaper subscriptions and retail sales are recognized upon the later of delivery or publication date, with adequate provision made for anticipated sales returns. The Company records, as a reduction of revenue, the estimated impact of such returns. The Company bases its estimates for sales returns on historical experience and has not experienced significant fluctuations between estimated and actual return activity.
Accounts receivable have been reduced by an allowance for amounts that may be uncollectible in the future. This estimated allowance is based primarily on the aging category, historical trends and management’s evaluation of the financial condition of the customer. Accounts receivable also have been reduced by an estimate of advertising rate adjustments and discounts, based on estimates of advertising volumes for contract customers who are eligible for advertising rate adjustments and discounts.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The Company has a significant amount of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets that are reviewed at least annually for possible impairment.
The Company performs its annual goodwill and intangible assets impairment test as of November 30. Goodwill and other intangible assets are reviewed for possible impairment between annual tests if an event occurred or circumstances changed that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit or other intangible assets below its carrying value.
Goodwill
The Company tests its goodwill at the reporting unit level, which is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment. The Company tests the goodwill for impairment using a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test compares the estimated fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. This step is performed to identify potential impairment, which occurs when the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value. The second step of the goodwill impairment test is only performed when there is a potential impairment and is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss at the reporting unit. During the second step, the Company allocates the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of the unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets). The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. The amount of the goodwill impairment is the difference between the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill and the implied fair value determined during the second step.
2010 FORM 10-K 57
In the third quarter of 2010, the Company performed an interim review of the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets at its online lead generation business for possible impairment, as a result of challenges facing the lead generation business due to the changing regulatory environment for for-profit higher education institutions. The Company used a discounted cash flow model to determine the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. A market value approach was also utilized to supplement the discounted cash flow model. The Company made estimates and assumptions regarding future cash flows, discount rates, long-term growth rates and market values to determine the reporting unit’s estimated fair value. The methodology used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s lead generation business reporting unit was consistent with the one used during the Company’s 2009 annual goodwill impairment test.
The key assumptions used by the Company were as follows:
•
Expected cash flows underlying the reporting unit’s business plans for the periods 2010 through 2015. The expected cash flows took into account historical growth rates, forecasts and long-term business plans, but also included an estimate for the possible impact of newly enacted and proposed “for-profit” education regulations on the Company’s lead generation business.
•
Cash flows beyond 2015 were projected to grow at a long-term growth rate, which the Company estimated by considering historical market growth trends, anticipated reporting unit performance and expected market conditions.
•
The Company used a discount rate of 20% to risk adjust the cash flow projections in determining the estimated fair value. This took into account the Company’s assessment of the risks inherent in the future cash flows of the reporting unit and the weighted average cost of capital of market participants in businesses similar to the reporting unit.
The online lead generation reporting unit failed step one of the interim goodwill impairment review, and the Company performed a step two analysis. The Company recorded a goodwill and other long-lived assets impairment charge of $27.5 million related to the reporting unit. Following the impairment, the remaining goodwill balance at the reporting unit as of October 3, 2010 was not significant. There exists a reasonable possibility that a decrease in the projected cash flows or long-term growth rate, or an increase in the discount rate assumption used in the discounted cash flow model of this reporting unit, could result in additional impairment charges.
The Company had 18 reporting units as of January 2, 2011. The reporting units with significant goodwill balances as of January 2, 2011, were as follows, representing 94% of the total goodwill of the Company:
As of November 30, 2010, in connection with the Company’s annual impairment testing, the Company used a discounted cash flow model, and where appropriate, a market value approach was also utilized to supplement the discounted cash flow model to determine the estimated fair value of its reporting units. The Company made estimates and assumptions regarding future cash flows, discount rates, long-term growth rates and market values to determine each reporting unit’s estimated fair value. The methodology used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s reporting units on November 30, 2010, was consistent with the one used during the 2009 annual goodwill impairment test. The Company made changes to certain of its assumptions utilized in the discounted cash flow models for 2010 compared with the prior year due largely to the improved economic environment, newly enacted and proposed for-profit education regulations, and their impact on the Company’s businesses. The key assumptions used by the Company were as follows:
•
Expected cash flows underlying the Company’s business plans for the periods 2011 through 2015. The expected cash flows took into account historical growth rates, the effect of the improved economic outlook at some of the Company’s businesses, particularly at the Company’s advertising-related businesses, but also included an estimate for the possible impact of newly enacted and proposed “for-profit” education regulations. Expected cash flows also reflected the anticipated savings from restructuring plans at the newspaper publishing and certain education divisions’ reporting units, and other initiatives.
•
Cash flows beyond 2015 were projected to grow at a long-term growth rate, which the Company estimated between 1% and 5% for each reporting unit.
•
The Company used a discount rate of 8.0% to 20.0% to risk adjust the cash flow projections in determining the estimated fair value.
The fair value of each of the reporting units exceeded its respective carrying value as of November 30, 2010.
In 2009, the Company recorded goodwill and other intangible asset impairment charges at two of its reporting units totaling $25.4 million. The remaining goodwill balances at these two reporting units as of January 2, 2011 totaled $22.8 million. Combined, the goodwill balance of $34.7 million at the three reporting units that have been subject to impairment charges in 2010 and 2009 represents less than 3% of the Company’s total goodwill balance of $1,376.4 million as of January 2, 2011. There exists a reasonable possibility that a decrease in the projected cash flows or long-term growth rate, or an increase in the discount rate assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model of these reporting units, could result in additional impairment charges.
The estimated fair value of the Company’s reporting units with significant goodwill balances exceeded their respective carrying values by a margin in excess of 25%. While less likely, additional impairment charges could occur at these reporting units as well, given the inherent variability in projecting future operating performance.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
The other intangible assets impairment test compares the fair value of the asset with its carrying value. The Company records an
58 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
impairment loss if the carrying value of the other intangible assets exceeds the fair value of the assets for the difference in the values. The Company uses a discounted cash flow model, and in certain cases, a market value approach is also utilized to supplement the discounted cash flow model to determine the estimated fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible assets. The Company makes estimates and assumptions regarding future cash flows, discount rates, long-term growth rates and other market values to determine the estimated fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible assets.
The Company’s intangible assets with an indefinite life are principally from franchise agreements at its cable television division. These franchise agreements result from agreements the Company has with state and local governments that allow the Company to contract and operate a cable business within a specified geographic area. The Company expects its cable franchise agreements to provide the Company with substantial benefit for a period that extends beyond the foreseeable horizon, and the Company’s cable television division historically has obtained renewals and extensions of such agreements for nominal costs and without material modifications to the agreements. The franchise agreements represent 93% of the $530.8 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets of the Company as of January 2, 2011. The Company grouped the recorded values of its various cable franchise agreements into regional cable television systems or units of account.
The key assumptions used by the Company to determine the fair value of its franchise agreements as of November 30, 2010, the date of its annual impairment review, were as follows:
•
Expected cash flows underlying the Company’s business plans for the periods 2011 through 2020, assuming the only assets the unbuilt start-up cable television systems possess are the various franchise agreements. The expected cash flows took into account the estimated initial capital investment in the system region’s physical plant and related start-up costs, revenues, operating margins and growth rates. These cash flows and growth rates were based on forecasts and long-term business plans and take into account numerous factors, including historical experience, anticipated economic conditions, changes in the cable television systems’ cost structures, homes in each region’s service area, number of subscribers based on penetration of homes passed by the systems and expected revenues per subscriber.
•
Cash flows beyond 2020 were projected to grow at a long- term growth rate, which the Company estimated by considering historical market growth trends, anticipated cable television system performance and expected market conditions.
•
The Company used a discount rate of 8% to risk adjust the cash flow projections in determining the estimated fair value.
The estimated fair value of the Company’s franchise agreements exceeded their respective carrying values by a margin in excess of 50%. There is always a possibility that impairment charges could occur in the future, given changes in the cable television market and U.S. economic environment, as well as the inherent variability in projecting future operating performance.
Pension Costs. Excluding special termination benefits, the Company’s net pension credit was $3.9 million, $8.1 million and $25.7 million for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company’s pension benefit costs are actuarially determined and are impacted significantly by the Company’s assumptions related to future events, including the discount rate, expected return on plan assets and rate of compensation increases. The Company’s expected return on plan assets assumption remained at 6.5% for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008. At December 28, 2008, the Company reduced its discount rate assumption from 6.0% to 5.75% and changed to a more current Mortality Table. The pension credit declined substantially in 2009, largely due to significant investment losses in 2008. At January 3, 2010, the Company increased its discount rate assumption from 5.75% to 6.0%. At January 2, 2011, the Company reduced its discount rate assumption to 5.6%. The Company estimates that it will record a net pension credit of approximately $3 million in 2011. The Company’s actual return (loss) on plan assets was 19.1% in 2010, 14.7% in 2009 and (25.0%) in 2008, based on plan assets at the beginning of each year. For each 1% increase or decrease to the Company’s assumed expected return on plan assets, the pension credit increases or decreases by approximately $15 million. For each 1% increase or decrease to the Company’s assumed discount rate, the pension credit increases or decreases by approximately $3 million.
The Company’s net pension cost (credit) includes an expected return on plan assets component, calculated using the expected return on plan assets assumption applied to a market-related value of plan assets. The market-related value of plan assets is determined using a five-year average market value method, which recognizes realized and unrealized appreciation and depreciation in market values over a five-year period. The value resulting from applying this method is adjusted, if necessary, such that it cannot be less than 80% or more than 120% of the market value of plan assets as of the relevant measurement date. As a result, year-to-year increases or decreases in the market-related value of plan assets impact the return on plan assets component of pension cost for the year.
At the end of each year, differences between the actual return on plan assets and the expected return on plan assets are combined with other differences in actual versus expected experience to form a net unamortized actuarial gain or loss in accumulated other comprehensive income. Only those net actuarial gains or losses in excess of the deferred realized and unrealized appreciation and depreciation are potentially subject to amortization. The types of items that generate actuarial gains and losses that may be subject to amortization in net periodic pension cost (credit) include:
•
Asset returns that are more or less than the expected return on plan assets for the year;
•
Actual participant demographic experience different from assumed (retirements, terminations and deaths during the year);
•
Actual salary increases different from assumed; and
•
Any changes in assumptions that are made to better reflect anticipated experience of the plan or to reflect current market conditions on the measurement date (discount rate, longevity increases, changes in expected participant behavior and expected return on plan assets).
2010 FORM 10-K 59
Amortization of the unrecognized actuarial gain or loss is included as a component of expense for a year if the magnitude of the net unamortized gain or loss in accumulated other comprehensive income exceeds 10% of the greater of the benefit obligation or the market-related value of assets (10% corridor). The amortization component is equal to that excess divided by the average remaining service period of active employees expected to receive benefits under the plan. At the end of 2007, the Company had net unamortized actuarial gains in accumulated other comprehensive income potentially subject to amortization that were outside the 10% corridor that resulted in amortized gains of $6,168,000 being included in the 2008 pension cost. Primarily as a result of the significant pension asset losses during 2008, increased life expectations and a decrease in the discount rate, the Company had net unamortized actuarial losses in accumulated other comprehensive income potentially subject to amortization that were outside the corridor that resulted in amortized losses of $40,000 being included in the 2009 pension cost. During 2009, there were pension asset gains that resulted in no net unamortized actuarial gains or losses in accumulated other comprehensive income subject to amortization outside the 10% corridor, and therefore, no amortized gain or loss amounts were included in the pension cost (credit) in 2010. During 2010, there were pension asset gains and a decrease in the discount rate. The Company currently estimates that there will be no net unamortized actuarial gains or losses in accumulated other comprehensive income potentially subject to amortization outside the corridor, and therefore, no amortized gain or loss amounts included in the pension cost (credit) in 2011.
Note M to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements provides additional details surrounding pension costs and related assumptions.
Income Tax Valuation Allowances. Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax and financial statement recognition of assets and liabilities. In evaluating its ability to recover deferred tax assets within the jurisdiction from which they arise, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. These assumptions require significant judgment about forecasts of future taxable income.
As of January 2, 2011, the Company had state income tax net operating loss carryforwards of $523.7 million, which will expire at various dates from 2011 through 2030. Also at January 2, 2011, the Company had approximately $39.7 million of foreign income tax loss carryforwards, of which $36.4 million may be carried forward indefinitely and $3.3 million that, if unutilized, will start to expire in 2012. At January 2, 2011, the Company has established approximately $41.4 million in valuation allowances against these deferred state and foreign income taxes, net of U.S. Federal income taxes, as the Company believes that it is more likely than not that the benefit from certain state and foreign net operating loss carry-forwards will not be realized. The Company has established valuation allowances against state income tax benefits recognized, without considering potentially offsetting deferred tax liabilities established with respect to prepaid pension cost and goodwill. Prepaid pension cost and goodwill have not been considered a source of future taxable income for realizing deferred tax benefits recognized since these temporary differences are not likely to reverse in the foreseeable future. The valuation allowances established against state income tax benefits recorded may increase or decrease within the next 12 months, based on operating results or the market value of investment holdings; as a result, the Company is unable to estimate the potential tax impact, given the uncertain operating and market environment.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. See Note B to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.
60 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of The Washington Post Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2011. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework. Management has concluded that, as of January 2, 2011, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective based on these criteria.
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2011 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included herein.
2010 FORM 10-K 61
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and
Shareholders of The Washington Post Company:
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to under Item 15 (1) on page 43 and listed in the index on page 45 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Washington Post Company and its subsidiaries at January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 2, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
McLean, Virginia
March 2, 2011
62 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2010 FORM 10-K 63
THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
64 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2010 FORM 10-K 65
THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
66 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A.
ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
The Washington Post Company, Inc. (the “Company”) is a diversified education and media company. The Company’s Kaplan subsidiary provides a wide variety of educational services, both domestically and outside the United States. The Company’s media operations consist of the ownership and operation of cable television systems, newspaper publishing (principally The Washington Post), and television broadcasting (through the ownership and operation of six television broadcast stations).
The Company announced on August 2, 2010, that it had entered into an agreement to sell Newsweek. On September 30, 2010, the Company completed such sale. The operating results of Newsweek have been presented in loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, for all periods presented.
Education-Kaplan, Inc. provides an extensive range of educational services for children, students and professionals. Kaplan’s various businesses comprise four categories: Higher Education, Test Preparation, Kaplan International and Kaplan Ventures.
Media-The Company’s diversified media operations consist of cable television operations, newspaper publishing and television broadcasting.
Cable television operations: Cable ONE provides cable services that include basic video, digital video, high-speed data and telephone service in the midwestern, western and southern states of the United States.
Newspaper publishing: Washington Post Media publishes The Washington Post (“the Post”), which is the largest and most widely circulated morning daily and Sunday newspaper, primarily distributed by home delivery in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area (including large portions of Maryland and northern Virginia). Washington Post Media also produces washingtonpost.com, an Internet site that features news and information products, as well as the full editorial content of The Washington Post. Through the Company’s other newspaper publishing businesses, the Company also publishes weekly publications and tabloids distributed within the Washington, DC, metropolitan area and elsewhere, and produces other websites and online magazines.
Television broadcasting: The Company owns six VHF television stations located in Houston, TX; Detroit, MI; Miami, FL; Orlando, FL; San Antonio, TX; and Jacksonville, FL. Other than the Company’s Jacksonville station, WJXT, the Company’s television stations are affiliated with one of the major national networks.
B.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Fiscal Year-The Company reports on a 52 to 53-week fiscal year ending on the Sunday nearest December 31. Fiscal year 2010, which ended on January 2, 2011, included 52 weeks. The fiscal years 2009 and 2008, which ended on January 3, 2010, and December 28, 2008, respectively, included 53 and 52 weeks, respectively. With the exception of most of the newspaper print publishing operations and corporate office, subsidiaries of the Company report on a calendar-year basis.
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation-The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States and include the assets, liabilities, results of operations and cash flows of the Company and its majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Reclassifications-Certain amounts in previously issued financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 2010 presentation, which includes the reclassification of the results of operations of the magazine publishing segment as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Use of Estimates-The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Management bases its estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results reported in future periods may be affected by changes in those estimates. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions.
Business Combinations-The purchase price of an acquisition is allocated to the assets acquired, including intangible assets, and liabilities assumed, based on their respective fair values at the acquisition date. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred. The excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net of the amounts assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recognized as goodwill. The net assets and results of operations of an acquired entity are included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements from the acquisition date.
Cash and Cash Equivalents-Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less and investments in money market funds with weighted average maturities of three months or less.
Restricted Cash-Restricted cash represents amounts held for students that were received from U.S. Federal and state governments under various aid grant and loan programs, such as Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, that the Company is required to maintain pursuant to U.S. Department of Education (DOE) and other regulations. Restricted cash also includes certain funds that the Company may be required to return if a student who receives Title IV program funds withdraws from a program. Prior-year amounts have been revised to conform with the 2010 presentation.
Concentration of Credit Risk-Cash and cash equivalents are maintained with several financial institutions domestically and internationally. Deposits held with banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand and are maintained with financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings. The Company
2010 FORM 10-K 67
routinely assesses the financial strength of significant customers, and this assessment, combined with the large number and geographical diversity of its customers, limits the Company’s concentration of risk with respect to trade accounts receivable.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts-Accounts receivable have been reduced by an allowance for amounts that may be uncollectible in the future. This estimated allowance is based primarily on the aging category, historical trends and management’s evaluation of the financial condition of the customer. Accounts receivable also have been reduced by an estimate of advertising rate adjustments and discounts, based on estimates of advertising volumes for contract customers who are eligible for advertising rate adjustments and discounts.
Investments in Marketable Equity Securities-The Company’s investments in marketable equity securities are classified as available-for-sale and, therefore, are recorded at fair value in the Consolidated Financial Statements, with the change in fair value during the period excluded from earnings and recorded net of income taxes as a separate component of other comprehensive income. If the fair value of a marketable equity security declines below its cost basis and the decline is considered other than temporary, the Company will record a write-down, which is included in earnings.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments-The carrying amounts reported in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, the current portion of deferred revenue and the current portion of debt approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these financial instruments. The fair value of long-term debt is determined based on a number of observable inputs, including the current market activity of the Company’s publicly traded notes, trends in investor demands and market values of comparable publicly traded debt.
Inventories-Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or current market value. Cost of newsprint is determined on the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method.
Property, Plant and Equipment-Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost and includes interest capitalized in connection with major long-term construction projects. Replacements and major improvements are capitalized; maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is calculated using the straight- line method over the estimated useful lives of the property, plant and equipment: 3 to 20 years for machinery and equipment, and 20 to 50 years for buildings. The costs of leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of their useful lives or the terms of the respective leases.
The cable television division capitalizes costs associated with the construction of cable transmission and distribution facilities and new cable service installations. Costs include all direct labor and materials, as well as certain indirect costs. The cost of subsequent disconnects and reconnects are expensed as they are incurred.
Evaluation of Long-Lived Assets-The recoverability of long-lived assets and finite-lived intangible assets is assessed whenever adverse events or changes in circumstances indicate that recorded values may not be recoverable. A long-lived asset is considered to be not recoverable when the undiscounted estimated future cash flows are less than the asset’s recorded value. An impairment charge is measured based on estimated fair market value, determined primarily using estimated future cash flows on a discounted basis. Losses on long-lived assets to be disposed of are determined in a similar manner, but the fair market value would be reduced for estimated costs to dispose.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets-Goodwill is the excess of purchase price over the fair value of identified net assets of businesses acquired. The Company’s intangible assets with an indefinite life are principally from franchise agreements at its cable television division, as the Company expects its cable franchise agreements to provide the Company with substantial benefit for a period that extends beyond the foreseeable horizon, and the Company’s cable television division historically has obtained renewals and extensions of such agreements for nominal costs and without any material modifications to the agreements. Amortized intangible assets are primarily student and customer relationship intangible assets, noncompete agreements, trademarks and databases, with amortization periods up to 15 years.
The Company reviews goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets at least annually, as of November 30, for possible impairment. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for possible impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. All other intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives. The Company tests its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets at the reporting unit level, which is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment. In reviewing the carrying value of indefinite-lived intangible assets at the cable television division, the Company aggregates its cable systems on a regional basis. The Company reviews the carrying value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets utilizing a discounted cash flow model, and, where appropriate, a market value approach is also utilized to supplement the discounted cash flow model. The Company makes assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows, discount rates, long-term growth rates and market values to determine each reporting unit’s estimated fair value. If these estimates or related assumptions change in the future, the Company may be required to record impairment charges.
Investments in Affiliates-The Company uses the equity method of accounting for its investments in and earnings or losses of affiliates that it does not control, but over which it exerts significant influence. The Company considers whether the fair values of any of its equity method investments have declined below their carrying value whenever adverse events or changes in circumstances indicate that recorded values may not be recoverable. If the Company considered any such decline to be other than temporary (based on various factors, including historical financial results, product development activities and the overall health of the affiliate’s industry), a write-down would be recorded to estimated fair value.
Cost Method Investments-The Company uses the cost method of accounting for its minority investments in nonpublic companies
68 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
where it does not have significant influence over the operations and management of the investee. Investments are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value as estimated by management. Charges recorded to write down cost method investments to their estimated fair value and gross realized gains or losses upon the sale of cost method investments are included in other (expense) income, net, in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. Fair value estimates are based on a review of the investees’ product development activities, historical financial results and projected discounted cash flows.
Revenue Recognition-Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the fees are fixed or determinable, the product or service has been delivered and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company considers the terms of each arrangement to determine the appropriate accounting treatment.
Education revenues: Tuition revenue is recognized ratably over the period of instruction as services are delivered to students, net of any refunds, corporate discounts, scholarships and employee tuition discounts. At Kaplan’s Test Preparation and International divisions, estimates of average student course length are developed for each course, and these estimates are evaluated on an ongoing basis and adjusted as necessary. Online access revenue is recognized ratably over the period of access. Course material revenue is recognized over the same period as the tuition or online access, if related, or when the products are delivered, if not related. Other revenues, such as student support services, are recognized when the services are provided.
During the fourth quarter of 2010, Kaplan Higher Education (KHE) phased in a new program, the Kaplan Commitment. Under this program, new students of Kaplan University, Kaplan College and other KHE schools enroll in classes for several weeks and assess whether their educational experience meets their needs and expectations before incurring any significant financial obligation. Kaplan also conducts academic assessments to help determine whether students are likely to be successful in their chosen course of study. Students who choose to withdraw from the program during this time frame (“risk-free period”) and students who do not pass the academic evaluation do not have to pay for the coursework. In general, the risk-free period is approximately four weeks for diploma programs and five weeks for associate’s and bachelor’s degrees. The Company does not recognize revenues related to coursework until the students complete the risk-free period, meet the academic requirements and decide to continue with their studies, at which time the fees become fixed and determinable.
Cable revenues: Cable revenues are primarily derived from subscriber fees for video, high-speed Internet and phone services, and from advertising. Cable subscriber revenue is recognized monthly as services are delivered. Advertising revenue is recognized when the commercials or programs are aired.
Newspaper publishing and television broadcasting revenues: Media advertising revenues are recognized, net of agency commissions, when the underlying advertisement is published or broadcast. Revenues from newspaper subscriptions and retail sales are recognized upon the later of delivery or publication date, with adequate provision made for anticipated sales returns.
Sales returns: Consistent with industry practice, certain of the Company’s products, such as newspapers, are sold with the right of return. The Company records, as a reduction of revenue, the estimated impact of such returns. The Company bases its estimates for sales returns on historical experience and has not experienced significant fluctuations between estimated and actual return activity.
Deferred revenue: Amounts received from customers in advance of revenue recognition are deferred as liabilities. Deferred revenue to be earned after one year is included in other liabilities in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
Leases-The Company leases substantially all of its educational facilities and enters into various other lease agreements in conducting its business. At the inception of each lease, the Company evaluates the lease agreement to determine whether the lease is an operating or capital lease. Additionally, many of the Company’s lease agreements contain renewal options, tenant improvement allowances, rent holidays and/or rent escalation clauses. When such items are included in a lease agreement, the Company records a deferred rent asset or liability in the Consolidated Financial Statements and records these items in rent expense evenly over the terms of the lease.
The Company is also required to make additional payments under operating lease terms for taxes, insurance and other operating expenses incurred during the operating lease period; such items are expensed as incurred. Rental deposits are included as other assets in the Consolidated Financial Statements for lease agreements that require payments in advance or deposits held for security that are refundable, less any damages, at the end of the respective lease.
Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits-The Company maintains various pension and incentive savings plans and contributes to several multiemployer plans on behalf of certain union-represented employee groups. Substantially all of the Company’s employees are covered by these plans. The Company also provides health care and life insurance benefits to certain retired employees. These employees become eligible for benefits after meeting age and service requirements.
The Company recognizes the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan (other than a multiemployer plan) as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and recognizes changes in that funded status in the fiscal year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. The Company measures changes in the funded status of its plans using the projected unit credit method and several actuarial assumptions, the most significant of which are the discount rate, the long-term rate of asset return and rate of compensation increase. The Company uses a measurement date of December 31 for its pension and other postretirement benefit plans.
Self-Insurance-The Company uses a combination of insurance and self-insurance for a number of risks, including claims related to employee health care and dental care, disability benefits, workers’ compensation, general liability, property damage and business
2010 FORM 10-K 69
interruption. Liabilities associated with these plans are estimated based on, among other things, the Company’s historical claims experience, severity factors and other actuarial assumptions. The expected loss accruals are based on estimates, and while the Company believes the amounts accrued are adequate, the ultimate loss may differ from the amounts provided.
Income Taxes-The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company records net deferred tax assets to the extent that it believes these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations; this evaluation is made on an ongoing basis. In the event the Company were to determine that it was able to realize net deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, the Company would record an adjustment to the valuation allowance, which would reduce the provision for income taxes.
The Company recognizes a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits. The Company records a liability for the difference between the benefit recognized and measured for financial statement purposes and the tax position taken or expected to be taken on the Company’s tax return. Changes in the estimate are recorded in the period in which such determination is made.
Foreign Currency Translation-Income and expense accounts of the Company’s foreign operations where the local currency is the functional currency are translated into U.S. dollars using the current rate method, whereby operating results are converted at the average rate of exchange for the period, and assets and liabilities are converted at the closing rates on the period end date. Gains and losses on translation of these accounts and the Company’s equity investment in its foreign affiliates are accumulated and reported as a separate component of equity and other comprehensive income. Gains and losses on foreign currency transactions, including foreign currency denominated intercompany loans on entities with a functional currency in U.S. dollars, are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Equity-Based Compensation-The Company measures compensation expense for awards settled in shares based on the grant date fair value of the award. The Company measures compensation expense for awards settled in cash, or that may be settled in cash, based on the fair value at each reporting date. The Company recognizes the expense over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period of the award.
Earnings Per Share-Earnings per share is calculated under the two-class method. Basic earnings per share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated similarly except that the computation includes the dilutive effect of the assumed exercise of options and restricted stock issuable under the Company’s stock plans.
Comprehensive Income-Comprehensive income consists of net income, foreign currency translation adjustments, the change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments in marketable equity securities and pension and other postretirement plan adjustments.
Discontinued Operations-A business is classified as a discontinued operation when (i) the operations and cash flows of the business can be clearly distinguished and have been or will be eliminated from the Company’s ongoing operations; (ii) the business has either been disposed of or is classified as held for sale; and (iii) the Company will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the business after the disposal transactions. The results of discontinued operations (as well as the gain or loss on the disposal) are aggregated and separately presented in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations, net of income taxes.
Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Pronouncements-In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new guidance that modifies the fair value requirement of multiple element revenue arrangements. The new guidance allows the use of the “best estimate of selling price” in addition to vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) and third-party evidence (“TPE”) for determining the selling price of a deliverable. A vendor is now required to use its best estimate of the selling price when VSOE or TPE of the selling price cannot be determined. In addition, the residual method of allocating arrangement consideration is no longer permitted. The guidance requires expanded qualitative and quantitative disclosures and is effective for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company will adopt this guidance in the first quarter of 2011. The Company does not expect the implementation of this guidance to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued additional disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The guidance requires previous fair value hierarchy disclosures to be further disaggregated by class of assets and liabilities. A class is often a subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial position. In addition, significant transfers between Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy are required to be disclosed. These additional requirements became effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, and did not have an impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company. In addition, the fair value disclosure amendments also require more detailed disclosures of the changes in Level 3 instruments. These changes will not become effective until interim and annual periods beginning after
70 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
C.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On September 30, 2010, the Company completed the sale of Newsweek magazine. Under the terms of the asset purchase agreement, the buyer assumed Newsweek’s subscription obligations and received Newsweek’s intellectual property, target working capital and selected equipment used in the business. The Company retained the pension assets and liabilities and certain employee obligations, including severance, and other liabilities arising prior to the sale. The Company recorded an after-tax loss on the transaction of $11.5 million, which is included in “Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax” in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations for fiscal year 2010.
The results of operations of the magazine publishing division for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008 are included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations as “Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax.” All corresponding prior period operating results presented in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes have been reclassified to reflect the discontinued operations presented. The Company did not reclassify its Consolidated Balance Sheet as of January 3, 2010 to reflect the discontinued operations. The Company also did not reclassify its Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows to reflect the discontinued operations.
Newsweek employees were participants in The Washington Post Company Retirement Plan, and the Company had historically allocated Newsweek a net pension credit for segment reporting purposes. Since the associated pension assets and liabilities were retained by the Company, the associated credit has been excluded from the reclassification of Newsweek results to discontinued operations. Pension cost arising from early retirement programs at Newsweek, however, is included in discontinued operations (see Note M).
In fiscal year 2010, Newsweek recorded $4.7 million in accelerated depreciation and property, plant and equipment write-downs in anticipation of the sale.
The summarized loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, for the years ended January 2, 2011, January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008 follows:
D.
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accounts receivable at January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010 consist of the following:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities at January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010 consist of the following:
Cash overdrafts of $26.2 million and $30.4 million are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities at January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010, respectively.
The changes in allowance for doubtful accounts and returns and allowance for advertising rate adjustments and discounts during 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
2010 FORM 10-K 71
E.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment at January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010 consist of the following:
Depreciation expense was $247.8 million, $291.7 million and $263.6 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Total interest capitalized during 2008 was $0.5 million and was related to the construction of a qualified asset. No interest expense was capitalized in 2010 and 2009.
F.
INVESTMENTS
Investments in Marketable Equity Securities. Investments in marketable equity securities at January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010 consist of the following:
At January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010, the Company owned 2,214 shares of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (“Berkshire”) Class A common stock and 424,250 shares of Berkshire Class B common stock, respectively. The Company’s ownership of Berkshire accounted for $300.7 million, or 88%, and $247.5 million, or 70%, of the total fair value of the Company’s investments in marketable equity securities at January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010, respectively.
Berkshire is a holding company owning subsidiaries engaged in a number of diverse business activities, the most significant of which consists of property and casualty insurance businesses conducted on both a direct and reinsurance basis. Berkshire also owns approximately 21% of the common stock of the Company. The chairman, chief executive officer and largest shareholder of Berkshire, Mr. Warren Buffett, is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Washington Post Company recently announced his retirement from its Board of Directors, upon the expiration of his current term in May 2011. The Company’s investment in Berkshire common stock is less than 1% of the consolidated equity of Berkshire. At January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010, the gross unrealized gain related to the Company’s Berkshire stock investment totaled $143.4 million and $90.2 million, respectively. There were no new purchases or sales of Berkshire common stock in 2010. During 2009, the Company invested $10.8 million in the Class B common stock of Berkshire.
As of January 2, 2011, the Company has a $25.5 million unrealized loss on its investment in Corinthian Colleges, Inc., a publicly traded company. At January 2, 2011, the investment has been in an unrealized loss position for under six months. The Company evaluated this investment for other-than-temporary impairment based on various factors, including the duration and severity of the unrealized loss, the reason for the decline in value and the potential recovery period, and the ability and intent to hold the investment and concluded that the unrealized loss is not other-than-temporary as of January 2, 2011. If any impairment is considered other-than-temporary, the investment will be written down to its fair value with a corresponding charge to the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
There were no new investments in marketable equity securities in 2010. During 2009 and 2008, the Company invested $10.8 million and $65.8 million in marketable equity securities, respectively. There were no sales of marketable equity securities during 2010 and 2009. During 2008, proceeds from the sales of marketable equity securities were $114.4 million and net realized gains on such sales were $47.3 million.
Investments in Affiliates. At the end of 2010, the Company’s investments in affiliates include a 49% interest in the common stock of Bowater Mersey Paper Company Limited, which owns and operates a newsprint mill in Nova Scotia. The Company also holds a 16.5% interest in Classified Ventures, LLC, which owns and operates several leading businesses in the online classified advertising space, and other investments.
During 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded $29.0 million and $6.8 million of impairment charges at the Company’s affiliates, respectively. The 2009 charges primarily relate to an impairment charge recorded on the Company’s interest in Bowater Mersey Paper Company as a result of the challenging economic environment for newsprint producers. In the second quarter of 2008, the Company recorded $6.8 million in impairment charges at two of the Company’s other affiliates.
G.
ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS
The Company completed business acquisitions totaling approximately $14.1 million in 2010, $26.1 million in 2009 and $123.5 million in 2008. The assets and liabilities of the companies acquired have been recorded at their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition; the purchase price allocations mostly comprised goodwill and other intangible assets, and property, plant and equipment.
During 2010, the Company acquired six businesses for $14.1 million. Kaplan acquired two small businesses in its Test Preparation division, one small business in its Ventures division and one small business in its International division. The company made two small acquisitions in its Cable and Other Businesses divisions. The purchase price allocations for these acquisitions mostly comprised goodwill and other intangible assets.
On September 30, 2010, the Company completed the sale of Newsweek. In December 2009, the Company completed the sale of Newsweek’s Budget Travel. Consequently, the Company’s income from continuing operations excludes magazine publishing division results, which have been reclassified to discontinued operations (see Note C).
72 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
In the second quarter of 2010, Kaplan completed the sale of Education Connection, which was part of the Kaplan Ventures division.
During 2009, the Company acquired three businesses for $22.9 million. Kaplan acquired one business in each of its International and Test Preparation divisions, and the newspaper division acquired a small local publication. The purchase price allocations for these acquisitions mostly comprised goodwill and other intangible assets. Also in 2009, the Company recorded $3.2 million of additional purchase consideration in connection with the achievement of certain operating results by a company acquired in 2007 and allocated the additional purchase consideration to goodwill.
During 2008, the Company acquired ten businesses within its education and newspaper segments, for a total of $93.1 million, financed with cash and $3.2 million in debt. Kaplan acquired nine businesses in its International, Test Preparation and Ventures divisions. In November 2008, Kaplan International exercised an option to acquire an 85% majority interest in Shanghai Kai Bo Education Management Investment Co., Ltd. (“Kaplan China”), a provider of education in China that offers preparation courses for entry to U.K. universities. Kaplan China’s results from the transaction date forward are included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. The purchase price allocations for these acquisitions mostly comprised goodwill and other intangible assets.
Also in 2008, the cable television division acquired subscribers primarily in the Mississippi area for $15.3 million. The purchase price allocations for these transactions mostly comprised intangible assets and property, plant and equipment.
During 2008, the Company recorded $15.1 million of additional purchase consideration in connection with the achievement of certain operating results by a company acquired in 2007 and allocated the additional purchase consideration to goodwill.
H.
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The education division made several minor changes to its operating and reporting structure in the first quarter of 2010, changing the composition of the reporting units within Kaplan Test Preparation, Kaplan Ventures and KHE (see Note R). The changes resulted in the reassignment of the assets and liabilities to the reporting units affected. The goodwill was allocated to the reporting units affected using the relative fair value approach.
As a result of challenges in the lead generation industry, in the third quarter of 2010, the Company performed an interim review of the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets at its online lead generation business, which are included within the other businesses segment. The business failed the step one goodwill impairment test and performed a step two analysis. The Company estimated the fair value utilizing a discounted cash flow model and recorded a goodwill and other intangible asset impairment charge of $27.5 million.
The education division reorganized its operations in the third quarter of 2009 into the following four operating segments for the purpose of making operating decisions and assessing performance: Higher Education, Test Preparation, Kaplan International and Kaplan Ventures. The reorganization changed the composition of the reporting units within the education division and resulted in the reassignment of the assets and liabilities. The goodwill was allocated to the reporting units using the relative fair value approach. As a result of the reassignment and allocation, the Company performed an interim review of the carrying value of goodwill at the education division for possible impairment on both a prereorganization and postreorganization basis. No impairment of goodwill was indicated at the prereorganization reporting units. On a postreorganization basis, the Company failed the step one goodwill impairment test at two reporting units (Kaplan EduNeering and Kaplan Compliance Solutions) within the Kaplan Ventures operating segment and performed a step two analysis. The Company recorded a goodwill and other long-lived asset impair- ment charge of $25.4 million related to these two reporting units. The fair value of Kaplan EduNeering was determined utilizing a discounted cash flow model; the fair value of Kaplan Compliance Solutions was determined using a cost approach.
In 2008, the Company recorded goodwill and other intangible asset impairment charges totalling $135.4 million. As a result of the challenging advertising environment at the Company’s community newspapers and The Herald, which are part of the newspaper publishing segment, the Company performed an interim review of the carrying value of goodwill and recorded a $59.7 million goodwill impairment charge. The Company estimated the fair value utilizing a discounted cash flow model. As part of the Company’s annual impairment review, a $69.7 million goodwill and other intangible assets impairment charge was recorded at the Company’s online lead generation business within the other businesses and corporate office segment due to lower than expected revenue and operating income growth since its acquisition. The Company estimated the fair value utilizing a discounted cash flow model. The Company also recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $6.1 million in the newspaper publishing segment as part of its annual impairment review. The Company estimated the fair value utilizing a market approach.
Also in the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a $28.4 million amortized intangible asset in connection with a noncompetition and nonsolicitation agreement entered into between the Company and the former Kaplan chief executive officer, who resigned in November 2008. This asset is being amortized over three years.
The Company amortizes the recorded values of its amortized intangible assets over their estimated useful lives. Amortization of intangible assets is estimated to be approximately $23 million in 2011, $11 million in 2012, $7 million in 2013, $4 million in 2014, $3 million in 2015 and $13 million thereafter.
2010 FORM 10-K 73
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, by segment, during 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
The changes in carrying amount of goodwill at the Company’s education division for 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
74 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
Other intangible assets consists of the following:
2010 FORM 10-K 75
I.
INCOME TAXES
Income from continuing operations before income taxes consists of the following:
Foreign results for 2009 include losses of a foreign affiliate associated with a $27.4 million impairment charge.
The provision for income taxes on income from continuing operations consists of the following:
The provision for income taxes on continuing operations exceeds the amount of income tax determined by applying the U.S. Federal statutory rate of 35% to income from continuing operations before taxes as a result of the following:
Results for 2010 include $7.7 million in U.S. Federal tax benefits from the U.S. manufacturing deduction (included in other, net above). Results for 2009 include $3.1 million of prior-year tax benefits, and results for 2008 include $4.6 million of prior-year tax expenses.
In addition to the income tax provision presented above for continuing operations, the Company also recorded tax benefits on discontinued operations. Losses from discontinued operations have been reclassified from previously reported income from operations and reported separately as loss from discontinued operations, net of tax. Tax benefits of $10.3 million, $18.8 million and $27.2 million with respect to losses from discontinued operations were recorded in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Also included in loss from discontinued operations for 2010 is an $11.5 million loss, including tax expense, on the disposal of the discontinued operations. Tax expense provided on the loss on disposal totaled $1.2 million, which resulted principally from nondeductible goodwill associated with the sale of Newsweek.
Deferred income taxes at January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010, consist of the following:
Deferred U.S. and state income taxes are recorded with respect to undistributed earnings of investments in foreign subsidiaries to the extent taxable dividend income would be recognized if such earnings were distributed. Deferred income taxes recorded with respect to undistributed earnings of investments in foreign subsidiaries are recorded net of foreign tax credits estimated to be available. However, no deferred U.S. or state income tax liabilities have been recorded at January 2, 2011 with respect to undistributed earnings of investments in foreign subsidiaries based on the year-end tax position.
Deferred U.S. and state income taxes have not been recorded for the full book value and tax basis differences related to investments in foreign subsidiaries because such investments are expected to be indefinitely held. The book value exceeded the tax basis of investments in foreign subsidiaries by approximately $60.7 million and $67.0 million at January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010, respectively. If the investments in foreign subsidiaries were held for sale instead of expected to be held indefinitely, additional U.S. and state deferred income tax liabilities, net of foreign tax credits estimated to be available on undistributed earnings, of approximately $18.5 million and $16.4 million would have been recorded at January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010, respectively.
The Company has approximately $523.7 million of state income tax loss carryforwards available to offset future state taxable income
76 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
and has established, with respect to these losses, approximately $27.7 million in deferred state income tax assets, net of U.S. Federal income tax. The Company has also established approximately $23.9 million in valuation allowances, with respect to state tax loss carryforwards, since all state tax losses may not be fully utilized in the future to reduce state taxable income.
State income tax loss carryforwards, if unutilized, will start to expire approximately as follows:
The Company has approximately $23.1 million of U.S. Federal income tax loss carryforwards obtained as a result of prior stock acquisitions. These U.S. Federal income tax loss carryforwards are expected to be fully utilized; during 2011 through 2013, approximately $5.2 million a year is expected to be utilized, and during 2014 through 2025, the balance is expected to be utilized. The Company has established approximately $8.1 million in deferred U.S. Federal tax assets with respect to these losses.
The Company has approximately $39.7 million of foreign income tax loss carryforwards, mainly as a result of prior stock acquisitions, that are available to offset future foreign taxable income, and has established, with respect to these losses, approximately $10.8 million in deferred foreign income tax assets. The Company has also established approximately $5.9 million in valuation allowances against the deferred tax assets recorded for the portion of foreign tax losses that may not be fully utilized to reduce future foreign taxable income. Approximately $36.4 million of foreign income tax loss carryforwards may be carried forward indefinitely, and $3.3 million of foreign loss carryforwards, if unutilized, will start to expire in 2012.
The Company has established $35.5 million in valuation allowances against state income tax assets recognized, net of U.S. Federal income tax. As stated above, approximately $23.9 million of the valuation allowances, net of U.S. Federal income tax, relate to state income tax loss carryforwards. The Company has established valuation allowances against state income tax assets recognized, without considering potentially offsetting deferred tax liabilities established with respect to prepaid pension cost and goodwill. Prepaid pension cost and goodwill have not been considered a source of future taxable income for realizing deferred tax assets recognized since these temporary differences are not likely to reverse in the foreseeable future. The valuation allowances established against state income tax assets recorded may increase or decrease within the next 12 months, based on operating results or the market value of investment holdings; as a result, the Company is unable to estimate the potential tax impact, given the uncertain operating and market environment. The Company has not established valuation allowances against any U.S. Federal income tax assets and has established valuation allowances against foreign income tax assets recorded only with respect to certain foreign tax loss carryforwards. The Company does not currently anticipate that within the next 12 months there will be any events requiring significant increases or decreases in U.S. Federal or foreign valuation allowances.
The changes in deferred tax valuation allowances during 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
The Company files income tax returns with the U.S. Federal government and various state and foreign jurisdictions, with the U.S. Federal considered the only major tax jurisdiction. The statute of limitations has expired on all consolidated U.S. Federal corporate income tax returns filed through 2006, and the Internal Revenue Service is not currently examining any of the post-2006 returns filed by the Company.
The Company endeavors to comply with tax laws and regulations where it does business, but cannot guarantee that, if challenged, the Company’s interpretation of all relevant tax laws and regulations will prevail and that all tax benefits recorded in the financial statements will ultimately be recognized in full. The Company has taken reasonable efforts to address uncertain tax positions, and has determined that there are no material transactions or material tax positions taken by the Company that would fail to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold for recognizing transactions or tax positions in the financial statements. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded a reserve for uncertain tax positions in the financial statements, and the Company does not expect any significant tax increase or decrease to occur within the next 12 months with respect to any transactions or tax positions taken and reflected in the financial statements. In making these determinations, the Company presumes that taxing authorities pursuing examinations of the Company’s compliance with tax law filing requirements will have full knowledge of all relevant information, and, if necessary, the Company will pursue resolution of disputed tax positions by appeals or litigation.
J.
DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following:
The Company’s other indebtedness at January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010 is at interest rates of 6% and matures in 2011.
In January 2009, the Company issued $400 million in unsecured ten-year fixed-rate notes due February 1, 2019 (the Notes). The
2010 FORM 10-K 77
Notes have a coupon rate of 7.25% per annum, payable semi-annually on February 1 and August 1. The Company used the net proceeds from the sale of the Notes and other cash to repay $400 million of 5.5% notes that matured on February 15, 2009. Under the terms of the Notes, unless the Company has exercised its right to redeem the Notes, the Company is required to offer to repurchase the Notes in cash at 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, upon the occurrence of both a Change of Control and Below Investment Grade Rating Events as described in the Prospectus Supplement of January 27, 2009.
The Company entered a $500 million five-year revolving credit agreement with a group of banks on August 8, 2006 (the “2006 Credit Agreement”). This agreement supports the issuance of the Company’s commercial paper, but the Company may also draw on the facility for general corporate purposes. The 2006 Credit Agreement will expire on August 8, 2011. The Company has not borrowed any money under this agreement. Any borrowings that are outstanding under the 2006 Credit Agreement would have to be repaid on or prior to the final termination date.
Under the terms of the 2006 Credit Agreement, the Company is required to pay a facility fee at an annual rate of between 0.04% and 0.10% of the amount of the facility, depending on the Company’s long-term debt ratings. Any borrowings are made on an unsecured basis and bear interest, at the Company’s option, at Citibank’s base rate or at a rate based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin that also depends on the Company’s long-term debt ratings. The 2006 Credit Agreement contains terms and conditions, including remedies in the event of a default by the Company, typical of facilities of this type and, among other things, requires the Company to maintain at least $1 billion of consolidated shareholders’ equity.
During 2010 and 2009, the Company had average borrowings outstanding of approximately $399.5 million and $426.7 million, respectively, at average annual interest rates of approximately 7.2% and 6.9%, respectively. The Company incurred net interest expense of $27.9 million, $29.0 million and $19.0 million during 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
At January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010, the fair value of the Company’s 7.25% unsecured notes, based on quoted market prices, totaled $457.2 million and $443.1 million, respectively, compared with the carrying amount of $396.7 million and $396.2 million. The carrying value of the Company’s other unsecured debt at January 2, 2011 approximates fair value.
K.
REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK
The Series A preferred stock has a par value of $1.00 per share and a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share; it is redeemable by the Company at any time on or after October 1, 2015, at a redemption price of $1,000 per share. In addition, the holders of such stock have a right to require the Company to purchase their shares at the redemption price during an annual 60-day election period; the first such period began on February 23, 2001. Dividends on the Series A preferred stock are payable four times a year at the annual rate of $80.00 per share and in preference to any dividends on the Company’s common stock. The Series A preferred stock is not convertible into any other security of the Company, and the holders thereof have no voting rights except with respect to any proposed changes in the preferences and special rights of such stock.
L.
CAPITAL STOCK, STOCK AWARDS AND STOCK OPTIONS
Capital Stock. Each share of Class A common stock and Class B common stock participates equally in dividends. The Class B stock has limited voting rights and as a class has the right to elect 30% of the Board of Directors; the Class A stock has unlimited voting rights, including the right to elect a majority of the Board of Directors. In the third quarter of 2010, a majority of the Company’s Class A shareholders voted to convert 50,810, or 4%, of the Class A shares of the Company to an equal number of Class B shares. The conversion had no impact on the voting rights of the Class A and Class B common stock.
During 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company purchased a total of 1,057,940, 145,040 and 167,642 shares, respectively, of its Class B common stock at a cost of approximately $404.8 million, $61.0 million and $99.0 million, respectively. In September 2010, the Board of Directors increased the authorization to repurchase a total of 750,000 shares of Class B common stock. The Company did not announce a ceiling price or a time limit for the purchases. The authorization included 16,312 shares that remained under the previous authorization. At January 2, 2011, the Company had authorization from the Board of Directors to purchase up to 431,995 shares of Class B common stock.
Stock Awards. In 1982, the Company adopted a long-term incentive compensation plan, which, among other provisions, authorizes the awarding of Class B common stock to key employees. Stock awards made under this incentive compensation plan are primarily subject to the general restriction that stock awarded to a participant will be forfeited and revert to Company ownership if the participant’s employment terminates before the end of a specified period of service to the Company. Some of the awards are also subject to performance conditions and will be forfeited and revert to Company ownership if the conditions are not met. At January 2, 2011, there were 331,875 shares reserved for issuance under the incentive compensation plan. Of this number, 48,359 shares were subject to awards outstanding and 283,516 shares were available for future awards. Activity related to stock awards under the long-term incentive compensation plan for the years ended January 2, 2011, January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, was as follows:
For the share awards outstanding at January 2, 2011, the afore-mentioned restriction will lapse in 2011 for 12,315 shares, in 2012 for 2,500 shares, in 2013 for 32,570 shares and in 2014 for 974 shares. Also, in early 2011, the Company made stock awards of 42,830 shares. Stock-based compensation costs resulting from
78 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
Company stock awards reduced net income by $2.9 million, $4.6 million and $3.7 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
As of January 2, 2011, there was $9.1 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to this plan. That cost is expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted average period of 1.6 years.
Stock Options. The Company’s employee stock option plan reserves 1,900,000 shares of the Company’s Class B common stock for options to be granted under the plan. The purchase price of the shares covered by an option cannot be less than the fair value on the granting date. Options generally vest over four years and have a maximum term of ten years. At January 2, 2011, there were 362,525 shares reserved for issuance under the stock option plan, of which 87,919 shares were subject to options outstanding and 274,606 shares were available for future grants.
Activity related to options outstanding for the years ended January 2, 2011, January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008 was as follows:
Of the shares covered by options outstanding at the end of 2010, 40,074 are now exercisable; 15,261 will become exercisable in 2011; 15,261 will become exercisable in 2012; 11,698 will become exercisable in 2013; and 5,625 will become exercisable in 2014. For 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded expense of $1.4 million, $1.3 million and $1.0 million related to this plan, respectively. Information related to stock options outstanding and exercisable at January 2, 2011 is as follows:
At January 2, 2011, the intrinsic value for all options outstanding, exercisable and unvested was $2.3 million, $0.5 million and $1.7 million, respectively. The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option. The market value of the Company’s stock was $439.50 at January 2, 2011. At January 2, 2011, there were 47,845 unvested options related to this plan with an average exercise price of $407.68 and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 9.3 years. At January 3, 2010, there were 38,794 unvested options with an average exercise price of $429.51.
As of January 2, 2011, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to this plan was $4.7 million, which is expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted average period of approximately 2.1 years. There were no options exercised during 2010 and 2009. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2008 was $2.4 million; a tax benefit from these stock option exercises of $1.0 million was realized during 2008.
During 2010, 2009 and 2008, all options were granted at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant. During 2010, the Company granted options of 22,500, with a weighted average fair value of $106.70. During 2009, the Company granted options of 1,000, 11,944, 10,000 and 1,350, with a weighted average fair value of $95.05, $100.27, $118.98 and $121.29, respectively. During 2008, the Company granted options of 2,000 and 15,000, with a weighted average fair value of $159.93 and $79.24, respectively. Also, in early 2011, an additional 50,000 stock options were granted.
The fair value of options at date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes method utilizing the following assumptions:
The Company also maintains a stock option plan at Kaplan that was adopted in 1997 and initially reserved 15%, or 150,000 shares, of Kaplan’s common stock for awards to be granted under the plan to certain members of Kaplan’s management. Under the provisions of this plan, options are issued with an exercise price equal to the estimated fair value of Kaplan’s common stock, and options vest ratably over the number of years specified (generally four to five years) at the time of the grant. Upon exercise, an option holder may receive Kaplan shares or cash equal to the difference between the exercise price and the then fair value.
In November 2008, Kaplan’s then chief executive officer resigned. The executive exercised 40,805 Kaplan stock options, sold 6,572 Kaplan shares and forfeited 21,526 unvested Kaplan stock options at the time of his resignation. A Kaplan senior manager continues to hold the remaining 2,000 outstanding Kaplan stock options at an option price of $652 (representing about 0.2% of Kaplan’s common stock), which expire in 2011. A Kaplan senior manager also holds 1,750 Kaplan shares that remain outstanding at December 31, 2010, and 3,454 Kaplan restricted shares issued in 2009 and 2010 that vest over a three-year period. The fair value of Kaplan’s common stock is determined by the Company’s compensation committee of the Board of Directors, and in January 2011, the committee set the fair value price at $1,450 per share. No options were awarded or exercised during 2010 or 2009.
Kaplan recorded a stock compensation credit of $1.2 million in 2010, compared to expense of $0.9 million for 2009 and a credit of $7.8 million for 2008. At December 31, 2010, the Company’s accrual balance related to Kaplan stock-based compensation totaled $8.1 million. There were no payouts in 2010 and 2009. In 2008,
2010 FORM 10-K 79
total net payouts were $85.1 million. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2008 was $67.4 million; a tax benefit from these stock option exercises of $26.3 million was realized during 2008.
Earnings Per Share. The Company’s earnings per share from continuing operations (basic and diluted) for 2010, 2009 and 2008 are presented below:
In 2009, the Company adopted new guidance that provides that unvested share-based payment awards containing nonforfeitable rights to dividends be treated as participating securities and included in the computation of earnings per share under the two- class method. The implementation of this guidance did not have a material impact on the earnings per share amounts of the Company for 2008, and, therefore, the Company adopted the guidance prospectively.
The 2010, 2009 and 2008 diluted earnings per share amounts exclude the effects of 30,225, 74,569 and 29,875 stock options outstanding, respectively, as their inclusion would be antidilutive.
M.
PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT PLANS
The Company maintains various pension and incentive savings plans and contributes to several multiemployer plans on behalf of certain union-represented employee groups. Most of the Company’s employees are covered by these plans.
The Company also provides health care and life insurance benefits to certain retired employees. These employees become eligible for benefits after meeting age and service requirements.
The Company uses a measurement date of December 31 for its pension and other postretirement benefit plans.
Defined Benefit Plans. The Company’s defined benefit pension plans consist of various pension plans and a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) offered to certain executives of the Company.
In connection with the Newsweek sale in 2010, the Company recorded $5.3 million in special termination benefits expense and $2.4 million in prior service cost expense; these amounts are included in discontinued operations.
In November 2008, Newsweek offered a Voluntary Retirement Incentive Program to certain employees, and 44 employees accepted the offer in the first quarter of 2009. Early retirement program expense of $6.6 million was recorded in 2009 and is included in discontinued operations. Newsweek offered a Voluntary Retirement Incentive Program to certain employees in the first quarter of 2008, and 117 employees accepted the offer. The early retirement program expense in 2008 totaled $28.3 million and is included in discontinued operations. The early retirement program expense for these programs is funded mostly from the assets of the Company’s pension plans.
The Company offered a Voluntary Retirement Incentive Program to certain employees of The Washington Post newspaper in the first quarter of 2009. A total of 221 employees accepted the offer, and early retirement program expense of $56.8 million was recorded in the second quarter of 2009, funded mostly from the assets of the Company’s pension plans. In the third quarter of 2009, the Company offered a Voluntary Retirement Incentive Program to certain employees at Robinson Terminal Warehouse Corporation; $1.1 million in early retirement program expense was recorded in the third quarter of 2009, also funded mostly from the assets of the Company’s pension plans. In the first quarter of 2008, a Voluntary Retirement Incentive Program was also offered to certain employees of The Washington Post newspaper and the corporate office; 236 employees accepted the offer; $82.8 million in early retirement program expense was recorded in 2008, also funded mostly from the assets of the Company’s pension plans.
The following table sets forth obligation, asset and funding information for the Company’s defined benefit pension plans at January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010:
80 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
The accumulated benefit obligation for the Company’s pension plans at January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010, was $1,040.5 million and $954.8 million, respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation for the Company’s SERP at January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010, was $72.0 million and $67.8 million, respectively. The amounts recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets for its defined benefit pension plans at January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010 are as follows:
Key assumptions utilized for determining the benefit obligation at January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010 are as follows:
The Company made no contributions to its pension plans in 2010, 2009 and 2008, and the Company does not expect to make any contributions in 2011. The Company made contributions to its SERP of $2.9 million and $4.0 million for the years ended January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010, respectively. As the plan is unfunded, the Company makes contributions to the SERP based on actual benefit payments.
At January 2, 2011, future estimated benefit payments, excluding charges for early retirement programs, are as follows:
The total cost (benefit) arising from the Company’s defined benefit pension plans for the years ended January 2, 2011, January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, including a portion included in discontinued operations, consists of the following components:
2010 FORM 10-K 81
The costs for the Company’s defined benefit pension plans are actuarially determined. Below are the key assumptions utilized to determine periodic cost for the years ended January 2, 2011, January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008:
At January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010, accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) includes the following components of unrecognized net periodic cost for the defined benefit plans:
During 2011, the Company expects to recognize the following amortization components of net periodic cost for the defined benefit plans:
Defined Benefit Plan Assets. The Company’s defined benefit pension obligations are funded by a portfolio made up of a relatively small number of stocks and high-quality fixed-income securities that are held by a third-party trustee. As of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the assets of the Company’s pension plans were allocated as follows:
Essentially all of the assets are actively managed by two investment companies. The goal of the investment managers is to produce moderate long-term growth in the value of these assets, while protecting them against large decreases in value. Both of these managers may invest in a combination of equity and fixed-income securities and cash. The managers are not permitted to invest in securities of the Company or in alternative investments. The investment managers cannot invest more than 20% of the assets at the time of purchase in the stock of Berkshire Hathaway or more than 10% of the assets in the securities of any other single issuer, except for obligations of the U.S. Government, without receiving prior approval by the Plan administrator. As of December 31, 2010, the managers can invest no more than 13% of the assets in international stocks at the time the investment is made, and no less than 9% of the assets could be invested in fixed-income securities. In January 2011, the Company increased the limit on international stocks to no more than 22% of the assets at the time of the investment. None of the assets is managed internally by the Company.
In determining the expected rate of return on plan assets, the Company considers the relative weighting of plan assets, the historical performance of total plan assets and individual asset classes and economic and other indicators of future performance. In addition, the Company may consult with and consider the input of financial and other professionals in developing appropriate return benchmarks.
The Company evaluated its defined benefit pension plans’ asset portfolios for the existence of significant concentrations (defined as greater than 10% of plan assets) of credit risk as of January 2, 2011. Types of concentrations that were evaluated include, but are not limited to, investment concentrations in a single entity, type of industry, foreign country and individual fund. Included in the assets are $161.6 million and $274.3 million of Berkshire Hathaway Class A and Class B common stock at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Approximately 52% of the Berkshire Hathaway common stock held at December 31, 2009 was sold during the first six months of 2010.
Fair value measurements are determined based on the assumptions that a market participant would use in pricing an asset or liability based on a three-tiered hierarchy that draws a distinction between market participant assumptions based on (i) observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets (Level 1); (ii) inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly (Level 2); and (iii) unobservable inputs that require the Company to use present value and other valuation techniques in the determination of fair value (Level 3). Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measure. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurements requires judgment and may affect the valuation of the assets and liabilities being measured and their placement within the fair value hierarchy.
82 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
The Company’s pension plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:
Cash equivalents and other short-term investments-These investments are primarily held in U.S. Treasury securities and registered money market funds. These investments are valued using a market approach based on the quoted market prices of the security, or inputs that include quoted market prices for similar instruments, and are classified as either Level 1 or Level 2 in the valuation hierarchy.
U.S. equities-These investments are held in common and preferred stock of U.S. corporations and American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) traded on U.S. exchanges. Common and preferred shares and ADRs are traded actively on exchanges, and price quotes for these shares are readily available. These investments are classified as Level 1 in the valuation hierarchy.
International equities-These investments are held in common and preferred stock issued by non-U.S. corporations. Common and preferred shares are traded actively on exchanges, and price quotes for these shares are readily available. These investments are classified as Level 1 in the valuation hierarchy.
U.S. Federal agency mortgage-backed securities-These investments consist of fixed-income securities issued by Federal Agencies and are valued using a bid evaluation process, with bid data provided by independent pricing sources. These investments are classified as Level 2 in the valuation hierarchy.
Corporate debt securities-These investments consist of fixed-income securities issued by U.S. corporations and are valued using a bid evaluation process, with bid data provided by independent pricing sources. These investments are classified as Level 2 in the valuation hierarchy.
Other fixed income-These investments consist of fixed-income securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and in private placements and are valued using a quoted market price or bid evaluation process, with bid data provided by independent pricing sources. These investments are classified as Level 1 or Level 2 in the valuation hierarchy.
Other Postretirement Plans. The following table sets forth obligation, asset and funding information for the Company’s other postretirement plans at January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010:
The amounts recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets for its other postretirement plans at January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010 are as follows:
The Company recorded a curtailment gain of $8.5 million in 2010 due to the sale of Newsweek; the gain is included in discontinued operations.
In 2009, the Company made changes to the cable division’s retiree health care benefits program, resulting in a $7.7 million curtailment gain. Also in 2009, the Company eliminated life insurance benefits for new retirees on or after January 1, 2009, resulting in a $0.7 million curtailment gain.
The discount rates utilized for determining the benefit obligation at January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010 for the postretirement plans were 4.60% and 5.25%, respectively. The assumed health care cost trend rate used in measuring the postretirement benefit obligation at January 2, 2011 was 9.5% for pre-age 65, decreasing to 5.0% in the year 2019 and thereafter. The assumed health care cost trend rate used in measuring the postretirement
2010 FORM 10-K 83
benefit obligation at January 2, 2011 was 24.2% for the post-age 65 Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MA-PD) plan, decreasing to 5.0% in the year 2020 and thereafter, and was 8.5% for the post-age 65 non MA-PD plan, decreasing to 5% in the year 2017 and thereafter.
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A change of one percentage point in the assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
The Company made contributions to its postretirement benefit plans of $4.4 million and $4.6 million for the years ended January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010, respectively. As the plans are unfunded, the Company makes contributions to its postretirement plans based on actual benefit payments.
At January 2, 2011, future estimated benefit payments are as follows:
The total cost arising from the Company’s postretirement plans for the years ended January 2, 2011, January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, including a portion included in discontinued operations, consists of the following components:
The costs for the Company’s postretirement plans are actuarially determined. The discount rates utilized to determine periodic cost for the years ended January 2, 2011, January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008 were 5.25%, 5.75% and 5.80%, respectively.
At January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010, accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) included the following components of unrecognized net periodic benefit for the postretirement plans, respectively:
During 2011, the Company expects to recognize the following amortization components of net periodic cost for the postretirement plans:
Multiemployer Pension Plans. Contributions to multiemployer pension plans, which are generally based on hours worked, amounted to $1.0 million in 2010, $1.1 million in 2009 and $1.2 million in 2008.
In recent years, The Washington Post newspaper has contributed to multiemployer pension plans on behalf of three union-represented employee groups: the CWA-ITU Negotiated Pension Plan on behalf of Post mailers, helpers and utility mailers; the IAM National Pension Fund on behalf of Post machinists; and the Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers on behalf of Post engineers, carpenters and painters. Contributions are made in accordance with the relevant collective bargaining agreements and are generally based on straight-time hours.
The Post has negotiated in collective bargaining the contractual right to withdraw from two of these plans; the right to withdraw from the CWA-ITU Negotiated Pension Plan (the Plan) was the subject of contract negotiations that reached an impasse. In July 2010, the Post notified the union and the Plan of its unilateral withdrawal from the Plan, effective November 30, 2010. In connection with this action, The Washington Post recorded a $20.4 million charge based on an estimate of the withdrawal liability. Payment of the actual withdrawal liability will relieve the Post of further liability to the Plan absent certain circumstances prescribed by law.
Savings Plans. The Company recorded expense associated with retirement benefits provided under incentive savings plans (primarily 401(k) plans) of approximately $19.1 million in 2010, $19.9 million in 2009 and $20.2 million in 2008.
N.
LEASES AND OTHER COMMITMENTS
The Company leases real property under operating agreements. Many of the leases contain renewal options and escalation clauses that require payments of additional rent to the extent of increases in the related operating costs.
84 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
At January 2, 2011, future minimum rental payments under noncancelable operating leases approximate the following:
Minimum payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $0.5 million due in the future under noncancelable subleases.
Rent expense under operating leases included in operating costs was approximately $134.0 million, $131.7 million and $122.9 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Sublease income was approximately $0.2 million, $0.7 million and $0.7 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Company’s broadcast subsidiaries are parties to certain agreements that commit them to purchase programming to be produced in future years. At January 2, 2011, such commitments amounted to approximately $42.2 million. If such programs are not produced, the Company’s commitment would expire without obligation.
O.
OTHER NON-OPERATING INCOME (EXPENSE)
A summary of non-operating income (expense) for the years ended January 2, 2011, January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008 follows:
A large part of the Company’s non-operating income (expense) is from unrealized foreign currency gains or losses arising from the translation of British pound and Australian dollar denominated intercompany loans into U.S. dollars.
P.
CONTINGENCIES AND LOSSES
Litigation and Legal Matters. A purported class action complaint was filed against the Company, Donald E. Graham and Hal S. Jones on October 28, 2010, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, by the Plumbers Local #200 Pension Fund. The complaint alleges that the Company and certain of its officers made materially false and misleading statements, or failed to disclose material facts relating to KHE, in violation of the U.S. Federal securities laws. The complaint seeks damages, attorneys’ fees, costs and equitable/injunctive relief. Based on an initial review of this complaint, the Company believes the complaint is without merit and intends to vigorously defend against it.
Kaplan, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, is a party to a previously disclosed class action antitrust lawsuit filed on April 29, 2005, by purchasers of BAR/BRI bar review courses from fall 1997 through July 2006, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The court approved a settlement of the case on July 9, 2007, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the approval of the settlement on April 23, 2009. Though the Ninth Circuit vacated the district court’s award of attorney’s fees to class counsel and counsel to various objectors to the settlement, and remanded to the U.S. District Court to consider the attorney’s fees issue anew, and though that issue continues to be litigated, the attorney’s fees award will be paid from the escrowed settlement funds so Kaplan does not anticipate that it will be affected by the ultimate determination of the attorney’s fees issue.
On February 6, 2008, Kaplan was served with another purported class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California alleging claims substantially similar to those alleged in the previously settled lawsuit but on behalf of a putative class that included all persons who purchased a bar review course from BAR/BRI in the United States after the July 2006 cut-off for class membership in the prior action. West Publishing Corporation, which owns BAR/BRI, is a co-defendant. On April 15, 2008, the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss. On May 20, 2008, the plaintiffs filed an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On October 18, 2010, the parties entered into a stipulation and settlement agreement, which requires court approval to become effective. In December 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit remanded the case to the District Court to consider approval of the settlement.
Several Kaplan subsidiaries are also subject to four unsealed complaints that include, among other allegations, claims under the U.S. Federal False Claims Act (31U.S.C. § 3729, et seq.) relating to eligibility for Title IV funding. The U.S. Government declined to intervene in all four cases, which are captioned:
United States of America ex rel. Carlos Urquilla-Diaz et al. v. Kaplan University et al. (unsealed March 25, 2008); United States of America ex rel. Jorge Torres v. Kaplan Higher Education Corp. (unsealed April 7, 2008); United States of America ex rel. Victoria Gatsiopoulos et al. v. ICM School of Business & Medical Careers et al. (unsealed September 2, 2008); and United States of America ex rel. Charles Jajdelski v. Kaplan Higher Education Corp. et al. (unsealed January 6, 2009).
The Diaz, Torres and Gatsiopoulos cases have been transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, where motions to dismiss have been filed in each case and await decision by the court. On December 22, 2010, the Court in the Southern District of Florida granted in part the motion to dismiss in the Gatsiopoulos case, with leave to file an amended pleading. The Court has not rendered decisions as to the other pending motions to dismiss. The Jajdelski case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, where a motion to dismiss was filed and awaits decision by the court. The Company will continue to vigorously defend each of these actions.
On October 21, 2010, KHE received a subpoena from the office of the Florida Attorney General. The subpoena sought information
2010 FORM 10-K 85
pertaining to the online and on-campus schools operated by KHE in and outside of Florida. KHE has been in discussions with the Florida Attorney General regarding the subpoena, for the purpose of determining which information would be responsive to the inquiry, as well as a reasonable timeframe for that information to be provided. KHE expects these discussions to continue and will continue to provide responsive information in 2011. KHE also may receive further requests for information from the Florida Attorney General.
On December 21, 2010, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunities Commission filed suit against KHE alleging racial bias by Kaplan in requesting credit scores of job applicants seeking financial positions. The Company will vigorously defend this action.
On February 7, 2011, KHE received a Civil Investigative Demand from the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Illinois. The demand primarily seeks information pertaining to Kaplan University online students who are residents of the State of Illinois. KHE is currently reviewing the demand and intends to cooperate with the inquiry.
The Company and its subsidiaries are also subject to administrative proceedings and are defendants in various other civil lawsuits that have arisen in the ordinary course of their businesses, including contract disputes; actions alleging negligence, libel, invasion of privacy, trademark, copyright and patent infringement; False Claims Act violations; violations of applicable wage and hour laws; and claims involving current and former students and employees. While it is not possible to predict the outcomes of these lawsuits, in the opinion of management, their ultimate dispositions should not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business or financial condition.
Student Financial Aid. The Company’s education division derives the majority of its net revenues from financial aid received by its students under Title IV programs administered by the DOE pursuant to the U.S. Federal Higher Education Act of 1965 (HEA), as amended. To maintain eligibility to participate in Title IV programs, the Company must comply with extensive statutory and regulatory requirements relating to its financial aid management, educational programs, financial strength, administrative capability, compensation practices, facilities, recruiting practices and various other matters. Among other things, the school must be licensed or otherwise legally authorized to offer postsecondary educational programs by the appropriate governmental body in the state or states in which it is physically located, be accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by the DOE and be certified to participate in the Title IV programs by the DOE. Schools are required periodically to apply for renewal of their authorization, accreditation or certification with the applicable state governmental bodies, accrediting agencies and the DOE. In accordance with DOE regulations, some KHE schools are combined into groups of two or more schools for the purpose of determining compliance with certain Title IV requirements, and each such group is assigned its own identification number, known as an OPEID number. As a result, the schools in KHE have a total of 33 OPEID numbers. Failure to comply with the requirements of HEA or the Regulations could result in the restriction or loss of the ability to participate in Title IV programs and subject the Company to financial penalties and refunds.
DOE regulations require schools participating in Title IV programs to calculate correctly and return on a timely basis unearned Title IV funds disbursed to students who withdraw from a program of study prior to completion. Failure to comply with these regulations could result in a requirement that the school post a letter of credit in an amount equal to 25% of its prior-year returns of Title IV program funds, or subject it to monetary liabilities, fines or other sanctions. Six of the KHE reporting units currently have letters of credit outstanding to the DOE as a result of this requirement, with a collective total face value of approximately $3.3 million.
Financial aid and assistance programs are subject to political and governmental budgetary considerations. There is no assurance that such funding will be maintained at current levels. Extensive and complex regulations in the United States govern all of the government financial assistance programs in which students participate.
For the years ended January 2, 2011, January 3, 2010, and December 28, 2008, approximately $1,460 million, $1,283 million and $904 million, respectively, of the Company’s education division revenue was derived from financial aid received by students under Title IV programs. Management believes that the Company’s education division schools that participate in Title IV programs are in material compliance with standards set forth in the HEA and the Regulations.
DOE Program Reviews. From 2007 through 2010, the DOE undertook Program Reviews at four of KHE’s campus locations and at Kaplan University. The DOE also undertook or announced Program Reviews at two of KHE’s campus locations in early 2011. The DOE has issued a final report with respect to one of the campus locations with no action taken. No final reports with respect to the other reviews have been issued. Therefore, the results of these reviews and their impact on Kaplan’s operations is uncertain.
On or about January 17, 2008, an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania contacted KHE’s CHI-Broomall campus and made inquiries about the Surgical Technology program, including the program’s eligibility for Title IV federal financial aid, the program’s student loan defaults, licensing and accreditation. Kaplan responded to the information requests and is fully cooperating with the inquiry. The U.S. Attorney has expressed concerns about the program’s historical sufficiency of externship sites, but has not concluded its inquiry. The DOE is also conducting a Program Review at the CHI-Broomall campus. CHI-Broomall and Kaplan have responded to a preliminary report issued by the DOE, have responded to a February 12, 2010, request by the DOE for additional information and are fully cooperating with its Program Review. Kaplan has not received a final Program Review report from the DOE. The U.S. Attorney’s Office has informed KHE that it may make further information requests upon the completion of the DOE Program Review. At this time, the Company cannot predict the ultimate impact the DOE Program Review or U.S. Attorney’s inquiry may have on Kaplan.
Other. In September 2010, KHE received a report from one of its accreditors, ACCSC, regarding its Riverside campus, which requested that KHE provide ACCSC with detailed information about how KHE schools intend to maintain compliance with U.S. Federal
86 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
regulations. KHE has responded to ACCSC’s request and at this time cannot predict if ACCSC will request additional information or take additional action. ACCSC accredits 32 Kaplan campuses.
Q.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements are determined based on the assumptions that a market participant would use in pricing an asset or liability based on a three-tiered hierarchy that draws a distinction between market participant assumptions based on (i) observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets (Level 1); (ii) inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly (Level 2) and (iii) unobservable inputs that require the Company to use present value and other valuation techniques in the determination of fair value (Level 3). Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measure. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurements requires judgment and may affect the valuation of the assets and liabilities being measured and their placement within the fair value hierarchy.
The Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:
(1) The Company’s money market investments are included in cash and cash equivalents.
(2) The Company’s investments in marketable equity securities are classified as available-for-sale.
(3) Includes U.S. Government Securities, corporate bonds, mutual funds and time deposits (with original maturities greater than 90 days, but less than one year).
(4) Includes The Washington Post Company Deferred Compensation Plan and supplemental savings plan benefits under The Washington Post Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, which are included in accrued compensation and related benefits.
(5) See Note J for the carrying amount of these notes.
For assets that are measured using quoted prices in active markets, the total fair value is the published market price per unit multiplied by the number of units held without consideration of transaction costs. Assets and liabilities that are measured using significant other observable inputs are primarily valued by reference to quoted prices of similar assets or liabilities in active markets, adjusted for any terms specific to that asset or liability.
R.
BUSINESS SEGMENTS
Through its subsidiary Kaplan, Inc., the Company provides educational services for individuals, schools and businesses. The Company also operates principally in three areas of the media business: cable television, newspaper publishing and television broadcasting.
Education products and services are provided by Kaplan, Inc. KHE includes Kaplan’s postsecondary education businesses, made up of fixed-facility colleges as well as online postsecondary and career programs. Test Preparation includes Kaplan’s standardized test preparation and tutoring offerings, as well as the professional domestic training business, K12 and other businesses. Kaplan International includes professional training and postsecondary education businesses outside the United States, as well as English-language programs. Kaplan Ventures is made up of a number of businesses in various states of development that are managed separately from the other education businesses.
In the first quarter of 2010, Kaplan made several minor changes to its operating and reporting structure: Kaplan Compliance Solutions was moved from Kaplan Ventures to Test Preparation; Kaplan Continuing Education was moved from Test Preparation to Kaplan Ventures; and Colloquy (a business that provides online services to non-profit higher education institutions) was moved from KHE to Kaplan Ventures. Segment operating results of the education division for fiscal years ended 2009 and 2008 have been restated to reflect these changes. Kaplan’s organizational structure is based on a number of factors that management uses to evaluate, view and run its business operations, which include, but are not limited to, customers, the nature of products and services and use of resources. The business segments disclosed in the Consolidated Financial Statements are based on this organizational structure and information reviewed by the Company’s management to evaluate the business segment results.
In 2010, the Company discontinued certain offerings of the K12 business and recorded $7.8 million in related closure costs. In the fourth quarter of 2009, a $4.6 million charge was recorded for product development and other write-downs at the K12 business. Also in 2010, Kaplan Test Preparation announced a plan to reorganize its business consistent with the migration of students to Kaplan’s online and hybrid test preparation offerings. In conjunction with this plan, Kaplan Test Preparation began to reduce the number of leased test preparation centers and incurred $10.4 million in costs, mostly comprised of charges related to early lease termination and property, plant and equipment write-downs. The plan is
2010 FORM 10-K 87
expected to be largely completed by the end of 2011, and the Company estimates that an additional $10.0 million in costs will be incurred. Also in 2010, KHE recorded $9.3 million in severance costs associated with a workforce reduction. In the fourth quarter of 2010, certain Kaplan operations moved to the former Newsweek headquarters facility. In connection with this move, $11.5 million in lease termination and other charges were recorded by the Company’s corporate office.
In March 2009, the Company approved a plan to close its Score tutoring centers. The Company recorded charges of $24.9 million in asset write-downs, lease terminations, severance and accelerated depreciation of fixed assets in the first half of 2009.
Restructuring-related expenses of $8.3 million and $11.0 million were recorded in 2009 and 2008, respectively, at Kaplan’s professional domestic training business (part of Test Preparation division).
In the third quarter of 2009, KHE modified its method of recognizing revenue ratably over the period of instruction as services are delivered to students from a weekly convention to a daily convention, on a prospective basis. If KHE’s revenue recognition convention had been on a daily convention in prior periods, revenues and operating income in the first quarter of 2009 would have increased by $7.0 million and $6.5 million, respectively, and revenues and operating income in the fourth quarter of 2008 would have decreased by $7.8 million and $7.3 million, respectively. The Company concluded that the impact of this change was not material to the Company’s financial position or results of operations for 2009 and 2008 and the related interim periods, based on its consideration of quantitative and qualitative factors.
Cable television operations consist of cable systems offering video, Internet, phone and other services to subscribers in midwestern, western and southern states. The principal source of revenue is monthly subscription fees charged for services.
Newspaper publishing includes the publication of newspapers in the Washington, DC, area and Everett, WA; newsprint ware- housing; and the Company’s electronic media publishing business (primarily washingtonpost.com and Slate). Revenues from newspaper publishing operations are derived from advertising and, to a lesser extent, from circulation.
Television broadcasting operations are conducted through six VHF television stations serving the Detroit, Houston, Miami, San Antonio, Orlando and Jacksonville television markets. All stations are network- affiliated (except for WJXT in Jacksonville), with revenues derived primarily from sales of advertising time.
Other businesses include the operating results of Avenue100 Media Solutions and other small businesses. Previously, these businesses were combined with the Corporate office in the Other businesses and corporate office division. Segment operating results are now reported separately for Other businesses and Corporate office and results for fiscal years 2009 and 2008 have been restated to reflect these changes.
Corporate office includes the expenses of the Company’s corporate office and the pension credit previously reported in the magazine publishing division.
Due to the sale of Newsweek, the magazine publishing division is no longer included as a separate segment as its results have been reclassified to discontinued operations. Newsweek employees were participants in The Washington Post Company Retirement Plan, and Newsweek was historically allocated a net pension credit for segment reporting purposes. Since the associated pension assets and liabilities were retained by the Company, the associated credit has been excluded from the reclassification of Newsweek results to discontinued operations. Pension cost arising from early retirement programs at Newsweek, however, is included in discontinued operations. The net pension credit of $35.4 million, $34.6 million and $41.7 million is included with operating results for the Corporate office for the fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Company’s foreign revenues in 2010, 2009 and 2008 totaled approximately $540 million, $505 million and $528 million, respectively, principally from Kaplan’s foreign operations. The Company’s long-lived assets in foreign countries (excluding goodwill and other intangible assets), principally in the United Kingdom, totaled approximately $57 million at January 2, 2011, and $58 million at January 3, 2010.
In computing income from operations by segment, the effects of equity in losses of affiliates, interest income, interest expense, other non-operating income and expense items and income taxes are not included.
Identifiable assets by segment are those assets used in the Company’s operations in each business segment. Investments in marketable equity securities are discussed in Note F.
88 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
Company information broken down by operating segment and education division:
Includes a $20.4 million charge in 2010 related to the withdrawal from a multiemployer pension plan.
2010 FORM 10-K 89
The Company’s education division comprises the following operating segments:
Test preparation amounts include revenues and operating losses from Score as follows (in thousands):
Kaplan Ventures amounts include revenues and operating income from Education Connection as follows (in thousands):
90 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
2010 FORM 10-K 91
S.
SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
Quarterly results of operations and comprehensive income for the years ended January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010 are as follows:
The sum of the four quarters may not necessarily be equal to the annual amounts reported in the Consolidated Statements of Operations due to rounding.
92 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
The sum of the four quarters may not necessarily be equal to the annual amounts reported in the Consolidated Statements of Operations due to rounding.
2010 FORM 10-K 93
Quarterly impact from certain items in 2010 (after-tax and diluted EPS amounts):
Quarterly impact from certain items in 2009 (after-tax and diluted EPS amounts):
94 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
2010 FORM 10-K 95
THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
TEN-YEAR SUMMARY OF SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the summary of significant accounting policies and additional information relative to the years 2008-2010 and refer to Note C for discussion of discontinued operations. Operating results prior to 2002 include amortization of goodwill and certain other intangible assets that are no longer amortized under GAAP.
Impact from certain items included in income from continuing operations (after-tax and diluted EPS amounts):
•
charge of $12.7 million ($1.38 per share) at The Washington Post in connection with the withdrawal from a multiemployer pension plan
•
goodwill and other long-lived assets impairment charge of $26.3 million ($2.96 per share) at the Company’s online lead generation business
•
charges of $19.3 million ($2.31 per share) related to severance and restructuring
•
gains, net, of $4.2 million ($0.47 per share) from non-operating unrealized foreign currency gains on intercompany loans
•
charges of $35.9 million ($3.82 per share) related to early retirement program expense at the newspaper publishing division
•
charges of $20.6 million ($2.19 per share) in connection with the restructuring of Kaplan’s Score and Test Preparation operations
•
$21.0 million ($2.23 per share) in accelerated depreciation related to the closing of The Washington Post’s College Park, MD, plant and the consolidation of operations at The Washington Post newspaper
•
goodwill and other long-lived assets impairment charge of $18.8 million ($2.00 per share) related to Kaplan Ventures
•
impairment charges of $18.8 million ($2.00 per share) at two of the Company’s affiliates
•
gains, net, of $10.3 million ($1.10 per share) from non-operating unrealized foreign currency gains on intercompany loans
•
goodwill, intangible assets and other impairment charges of $115.7 million ($12.35 per share) at the Company’s online lead generation business; at the Company’s community newspapers, The Herald and other operations included in the newspaper publishing segment; and at two of the Company’s equity affiliates
•
charges of $50.1 million ($5.27 per share) related to early retirement program expense at The Washington Post newspaper and the corporate office
•
$13.9 million ($1.48 per share) in accelerated depreciation related to the planned closing of The Washington Post’s College Park, MD, plant
•
charges of $6.8 million ($0.72 per share) in connection with the restructuring of Test Preparation’s professional training businesses
•
gains of $28.9 million ($3.09 per share) from the sales of marketable securities
•
losses, net, of $28.5 million ($3.04 per share) from non-operating unrealized foreign currency losses on intercompany loans
•
charge of $9.5 million ($1.01 per share) in income tax expense related to valuation allowances provided against certain state and local income tax benefits, net of U.S. Federal income tax benefits
96 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
•
charge of additional net income tax expense of $6.6 million ($0.70 per share), as the result of a $12.9 million increase in taxes associated with Bowater Mersey, offset by a tax benefit of $6.3 million associated with changes in certain state income tax laws
•
charges of $10.3 million ($1.08 per share) in connection with the restructuring of Kaplan’s Score and Test Preparation operations
•
gain of $5.9 million ($0.62 per share) from the sale of property at the Company’s television station in Miami
•
gains of $5.5 million ($0.58 per share) from non-operating unrealized foreign currency gains on intercompany loans
•
charge of $31.7 million ($3.30 per share) related to early retirement plan buyouts
•
charge of $9.0 million ($0.94 per share) from the write-down of a marketable equity security
•
charge of $8.3 million ($0.86 per share) related to an agreement to settle a lawsuit at Kaplan
•
transition costs and operating losses at Kaplan related to acquisitions and startups for 2006 of $8.0 million ($0.83 per share)
•
gain of $27.4 million ($2.86 per share) on the sale of the Company’s 49% interest in BrassRing
•
insurance recoveries of $6.4 million ($0.67 per share) from cable division losses related to Hurricane Katrina
•
gains of $21.1 million ($2.19 per share) from the sales of marketable equity securities
•
charges and lost revenue of $17.3 million ($1.80 per share) associated with Hurricane Katrina and other hurricanes
•
gain of $11.2 million ($1.16 per share) from sales of non-operating land and marketable equity securities
•
gain of $32.3 million ($3.38 per share) on the sale of the Company’s 50% interest in the International Herald Tribune
•
gain of $25.5 million ($2.66 per share) on sale of land at The Washington Post newspaper
•
charge of $20.8 million ($2.18 per share) for early retirement programs at The Washington Post newspaper
•
Kaplan stock compensation expense of $6.4 million ($0.67 per share) for the 10% premium associated with the purchase of outstanding Kaplan stock options
•
charge of $3.9 million ($0.41 per share) in connection with the establishment of the Kaplan Educational Foundation
•
gain of $16.7 million ($1.75 per share) on the exchange of certain cable systems
•
charge of $1.7 million ($0.20 per share) for early retirement programs at The Washington Post newspaper
•
gain of $196.5 million ($20.69 per share) on the exchange of certain cable systems
•
noncash goodwill and other intangible asset impairment charge of $19.9 million ($2.10 per share) related to BrassRing investment
•
charges of $18.3 million ($1.93 per share) from the write-down of a non-operating parcel of land and certain cost method investments to their estimated fair value
2010 FORM 10-K 97
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
98 THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number
Description
3.1
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated November 13, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2003).
3.2
Certificate of Designation for the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock dated September 22, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 22, 2003).
3.3
By-Laws of the Company as amended and restated through November 8, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2007).
4.1
Second Supplemental Indenture dated January 30, 2009, between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as successor to The First National Bank of Chicago, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 30, 2009).
4.2
Five Year Credit Agreement dated as of August 8, 2006, among the Company, Citibank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Wachovia Bank, National Association, SunTrust Bank, The Bank of New York, PNC Bank, National Association, Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 2, 2006).
10.1
The Washington Post Company Incentive Compensation Plan as amended and restated on May 13, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 18, 2010).*
10.2
The Washington Post Company Stock Option Plan as amended and restated effective May 31, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2003).*
10.3
The Washington Post Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan as amended and restated on September 10, 2008, and amended December 18, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2010).*
10.4
The Washington Post Company Deferred Compensation Plan as amended and restated through December 2007 and amended September 23, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 3, 2010).*
List of subsidiaries of the Company.
Consent of independent registered public accounting firm.
Power of attorney dated February 22, 2011.
31.1
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer.
31.2
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer.
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer.
The following financial statements from The Washington Post Company Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2011, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Common Shareholders’ Equity, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.
*A management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be included as an exhibit hereto pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K.
2010 FORM 10-K 99

---

Stock Performance Metrics:
Return: -0.006624034140259027
1-Day Return: $1_day_return
3-Day Return: $3_day_return
5-Day Return: $5_day_return
10-Day Return: $10_day_return
20-Day Return: $20_day_return
40-Day Return: $40_day_return
60-Day Return: $60_day_return
80-Day Return: $80_day_return
100-Day Return: $100_day_return
150-Day Return: $150_day_return
252-Day Return: $252_day_return