SEC Form 10-K Filing Report

Company: GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC
CIK: 886982
SIC Code: 6211
Filing Date: 2010-03-01 00:00:00
Market Capitalization: 80474392.82852173

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of potential regulatory limitations on our receipt of funds from our regulated subsidiaries and our payment of dividends to shareholders of Group Inc.
The table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of Group Inc. or any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act), of our common stock during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended December 2009.
(1)
On March 21, 2000, we announced that our board of directors had approved a repurchase program, pursuant to which up to 15 million shares of our common stock may be repurchased. This repurchase program was increased by an aggregate of 280 million shares by resolutions of our board of directors adopted on June 18, 2001, March 18, 2002, November 20, 2002, January 30, 2004, January 25, 2005, September 16, 2005, September 11, 2006 and December 17, 2007. We use our share repurchase program to help maintain the appropriate level of common equity and to substantially offset increases in share count over time resulting from employee share-based compensation.
The repurchase program is effected primarily through regular open-market purchases, the amounts and timing of which are determined primarily by our current and projected capital positions (i.e., comparisons of our desired level of capital to our actual level of capital) but which may also be influenced by general market conditions, the prevailing price and trading volumes of our common stock and regulatory restrictions. The total remaining authorization under the repurchase program was 60,837,406 shares as of February 12, 2010; the repurchase program has no set expiration or termination date.
Since July 2008, we have not repurchased shares of our common stock in the open market other than repurchases of the type described in footnote (2). Any repurchase of our common stock requires approval by the Federal Reserve Board.
(2)
Relates to repurchases of common stock by a broker-dealer subsidiary to facilitate customer transactions in the ordinary course of business.
Information relating to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance is set forth in Part III, Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
The Selected Financial Data table is set forth under Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
INDEX
Page
No.
Introduction
Executive Overview
Business Environment
Certain Risk Factors That May Affect Our Businesses
Critical Accounting Policies
Fair Value
Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets
Use of Estimates
Results of Operations
Financial Overview
Segment Operating Results
Geographic Data
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements
Equity Capital
Contractual Obligations
Risk Management
Market Risk
Credit Risk
Derivatives
Liquidity and Funding Risk
Operational Risk
Recent Accounting Developments
Introduction
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (Group Inc.) is a leading global investment banking, securities and investment management firm that provides a wide range of financial services to a substantial and diversified client base that includes corporations, financial institutions, governments and high-net-worth individuals. Founded in 1869, the firm is headquartered in New York and maintains offices in London, Frankfurt, Tokyo, Hong Kong and other major financial centers around the world.
Our activities are divided into three segments:
•
Investment Banking. We provide a broad range of investment banking services to a diverse group of corporations, financial institutions, investment funds, governments and individuals.
•
Trading and Principal Investments. We facilitate client transactions with a diverse group of corporations, financial institutions, investment funds, governments and individuals through market making in, trading of and investing in fixed income and equity products, currencies, commodities and derivatives on these products. We also take proprietary positions on certain of these products. In addition, we engage in market-making activities on equities and options exchanges, and we clear client transactions on major stock, options and futures exchanges worldwide. In connection with our merchant banking and other investing activities, we make principal investments directly and through funds that we raise and manage.
•
Asset Management and Securities Services. We provide investment and wealth advisory services and offer investment products (primarily through separately managed accounts and commingled vehicles, such as mutual funds and private investment funds) across all major asset classes to a diverse group of institutions and individuals worldwide and provide prime brokerage services, financing services and securities lending services to institutional clients, including hedge funds, mutual funds, pension funds and foundations, and to high-net-worth individuals worldwide.
When we use the terms “Goldman Sachs,” “the firm,” “we,” “us” and “our,” we mean Group Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries. References herein to our Annual Report on Form 10-K are to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
In connection with becoming a bank holding company, we were required to change our fiscal year-end from November to December. This change in our fiscal year-end resulted in a one-month transition period that began on November 29, 2008 and ended on December 26, 2008. Financial information for this fiscal transition period is included in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K. In April 2009, the Board of Directors of Group Inc. (the Board) approved a change in our fiscal year-end from the last Friday of December to December 31. Fiscal 2009 began on December 27, 2008 and ended on December 31, 2009.
All references to 2009, 2008 and 2007, unless specifically stated otherwise, refer to our fiscal years ended, or the dates, as the context requires, December 31, 2009, November 28, 2008 and November 30, 2007, respectively, and any reference to a future year refers to a fiscal year ending on December 31 of that year. All references to December 2008, unless specifically stated otherwise, refer to our fiscal one month ended, or the date, as the context requires, December 26, 2008. Certain reclassifications have been made to previously reported amounts to conform to the current presentation.
In this discussion, we have included statements that may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts but instead represent only our beliefs regarding future events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and outside our control. These statements include statements other than historical information or statements of current condition and may relate to our future plans and objectives and results, among other things, and may also include statements about the objectives and effectiveness of our risk management and
liquidity policies, statements about trends in or growth opportunities for our businesses, statements about our future status, activities or reporting under U.S. or non-U.S. banking and financial regulation, and statements about our investment banking transaction backlog. By identifying these statements for you in this manner, we are alerting you to the possibility that our actual results and financial condition may differ, possibly materially, from the anticipated results and financial condition indicated in these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results and financial condition to differ from those indicated in these forward-looking statements include, among others, those discussed below under “- Certain Risk Factors That May Affect Our Businesses” as well as “Risk Factors” in Part I,

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

---

ITEM 4. RESERVED

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are set forth under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk Management” in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEX
Page
No.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Financial Statements - One Month Ended December 2008
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Description of Business
Note 2 - Significant Accounting Policies
Note 3 - Financial Instruments
Note 4 - Securitization Activities and Variable Interest Entities
Note 5 - Deposits
Note 6 - Short-Term Borrowings
Note 7 - Long-Term Borrowings
Note 8 - Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
Note 9 - Shareholders’ Equity
Note 10 - Earnings Per Common Share
Note 11 - Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets
Note 12 - Other Assets and Other Liabilities
Note 13 - Employee Benefit Plans
Note 14 - Employee Incentive Plans
Note 15 - Transactions with Affiliated Funds
Note 16 - Income Taxes
Note 17 - Regulation and Capital Adequacy
Note 18 - Business Segments
Note 19 - Interest Income and Interest Expense
Note 20 - Parent Company
Supplemental Financial Information
Quarterly Results
Common Stock Price Range
Selected Financial Data
Statistical Disclosures
Management’s Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting
Management of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., together with its consolidated subsidiaries (the firm), is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The firm’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the firm’s principal executive and principal financial officers to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the firm’s financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As of the end of the firm’s 2009 fiscal year, management conducted an assessment of the firm’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has determined that the firm’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 was effective.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of the firm; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the firm’s assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.
The firm’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing on page 124, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the firm’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and the Shareholders of
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.:
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) at December 31, 2009 and November 28, 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, November 28, 2008 and November 30, 2007 and for the one-month period ended December 26, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing on page 123. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
February 26, 2010
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
See page 130 for consolidated financial statements for the one month ended December 2008.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(1)
In connection with becoming a bank holding company, the firm was required to change its fiscal year-end from November to December. The beginning of the year ended December 2009 is December 27, 2008.
(2)
Relates primarily to repurchases of common stock by a broker-dealer subsidiary to facilitate customer transactions in the ordinary course of business and shares withheld to satisfy withholding tax requirements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:
Cash payments for interest, net of capitalized interest, were $7.32 billion, $32.37 billion and $40.74 billion for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007, respectively.
Cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds, were $4.78 billion, $3.47 billion and $5.78 billion for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007, respectively.
Non-cash activities:
The firm assumed $16 million, $790 million and $409 million of debt in connection with business acquisitions for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007, respectively.
See page 130 for consolidated financial statements for the one month ended December 2008.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
See page 130 for consolidated financial statements for the one month ended December 2008.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ONE MONTH ENDED DECEMBER 2008
Consolidated Statement of Earnings
(1)
Rounded to the nearest penny. Exact dividend amount was $0.4666666 per common share and was reflective of a four-month period (December 2008 through March 2009), due to the change in the firm’s fiscal year-end.
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:
Cash payments for interest, net of capitalized interest, were $459 million for the one month ended December 2008.
Cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds, were $171 million for the one month ended December 2008.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1.
Description of Business
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (Group Inc.), a Delaware corporation, together with its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the firm), is a leading global investment banking, securities and investment management firm that provides a wide range of financial services to a substantial and diversified client base that includes corporations, financial institutions, governments and high-net-worth individuals. Founded in 1869, the firm is headquartered in New York and maintains offices in London, Frankfurt, Tokyo, Hong Kong and other major financial centers around the world.
The firm’s activities are divided into three segments:
•
Investment Banking. The firm provides a broad range of investment banking services to a diverse group of corporations, financial institutions, investment funds, governments and individuals.
•
Trading and Principal Investments. The firm facilitates client transactions with a diverse group of corporations, financial institutions, investment funds, governments and individuals through market making in, trading of and investing in fixed income and equity products, currencies, commodities and derivatives on these products. The firm also takes proprietary positions on certain of these products. In addition, the firm engages in market-making activities on equities and options exchanges, and the firm clears client transactions on major stock, options and futures exchanges worldwide. In connection with the firm’s merchant banking and other investing activities, the firm makes principal investments directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages.
•
Asset Management and Securities Services. The firm provides investment and wealth advisory services and offers investment products (primarily through separately managed accounts and commingled vehicles, such as mutual funds and private investment funds) across all major asset classes to a diverse group of institutions and individuals worldwide and provides prime brokerage services, financing services and securities lending services to institutional clients, including hedge funds, mutual funds, pension funds and foundations, and to high-net-worth individuals worldwide.
Note 2.
Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Group Inc. and all other entities in which the firm has a controlling financial interest. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
The firm determines whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity by first evaluating whether the entity is a voting interest entity, a variable interest entity (VIE) or a qualifying special-purpose entity (QSPE) under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
•
Voting Interest Entities. Voting interest entities are entities in which (i) the total equity investment at risk is sufficient to enable the entity to finance its activities independently and (ii) the equity holders have the obligation to absorb losses, the right to receive residual returns and the right to make decisions about the entity’s activities. The usual condition for a controlling financial interest in a voting interest entity is ownership of a majority voting interest. Accordingly, the firm consolidates voting interest entities in which it has a majority voting interest.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
•
Variable Interest Entities. VIEs are entities that lack one or more of the characteristics of a voting interest entity. A controlling financial interest in a VIE is present when an enterprise has a variable interest, or a combination of variable interests, that will absorb a majority of the VIE’s expected losses, receive a majority of the VIE’s expected residual returns, or both. The enterprise with a controlling financial interest, known as the primary beneficiary, consolidates the VIE. The firm determines whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE by first performing a qualitative analysis of the VIE’s expected losses and expected residual returns. This analysis includes a review of, among other factors, the VIE’s capital structure, contractual terms, which interests create or absorb variability, related party relationships and the design of the VIE. Where qualitative analysis is not conclusive, the firm performs a quantitative analysis. For purposes of allocating a VIE’s expected losses and expected residual returns to its variable interest holders, the firm utilizes the “top down” method. Under this method, the firm calculates its share of the VIE’s expected losses and expected residual returns using the specific cash flows that would be allocated to it, based on contractual arrangements and/or the firm’s position in the capital structure of the VIE, under various probability-weighted scenarios. The firm reassesses its initial evaluation of an entity as a VIE and its initial determination of whether the firm is the primary beneficiary of a VIE upon the occurrence of certain reconsideration events. See “- Recent Accounting Developments” below for information regarding amendments to accounting for VIEs.
•
QSPEs. QSPEs are passive entities that are commonly used in mortgage and other securitization transactions. To be considered a QSPE, an entity must satisfy certain criteria. These criteria include the types of assets a QSPE may hold, limits on asset sales, the use of derivatives and financial guarantees, and the level of discretion a servicer may exercise in attempting to collect receivables. These criteria may require management to make judgments about complex matters, such as whether a derivative is considered passive and the level of discretion a servicer may exercise, including, for example, determining when default is reasonably foreseeable. The firm does not consolidate QSPEs. See “- Recent Accounting Developments” below for information regarding amendments to accounting for QSPEs.
•
Equity-Method Investments. When the firm does not have a controlling financial interest in an entity but exerts significant influence over the entity’s operating and financial policies (generally defined as owning a voting interest of 20% to 50%) and has an investment in common stock or in-substance common stock, the firm accounts for its investment either under the equity method of accounting or at fair value pursuant to the fair value option available under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 825-10. In general, the firm accounts for investments acquired subsequent to November 24, 2006, when the fair value option became available, at fair value. In certain cases, the firm applies the equity method of accounting to new investments that are strategic in nature or closely related to the firm’s principal business activities, where the firm has a significant degree of involvement in the cash flows or operations of the investee, or where cost-benefit considerations are less significant. See “- Revenue Recognition - Other Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities at Fair Value” below for a discussion of the firm’s application of the fair value option.
•
Other. If the firm does not consolidate an entity or apply the equity method of accounting, the firm accounts for its investment at fair value. The firm also has formed numerous nonconsolidated investment funds with third-party investors that are typically organized as limited partnerships. The firm acts as general partner for these funds and generally does not hold a majority of the economic interests in these funds. The firm has generally provided the third-party investors with rights to terminate the funds or to remove the firm as the general partner. As a result, the firm does not consolidate these funds. These fund investments are included in “Trading assets, at fair value” in the consolidated statements of financial condition.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In connection with becoming a bank holding company, the firm was required to change its fiscal year-end from November to December. This change in the firm’s fiscal year-end resulted in a one-month transition period that began on November 29, 2008 and ended on December 26, 2008. In April 2009, the Board of Directors of Group Inc. (the Board) approved a change in the firm’s fiscal year-end from the last Friday of December to December 31. Fiscal 2009 began on December 27, 2008 and ended on December 31, 2009.
All references to 2009, 2008 and 2007, unless specifically stated otherwise, refer to the firm’s fiscal years ended, or the dates, as the context requires, December 31, 2009, November 28, 2008 and November 30, 2007, respectively, and any reference to a future year refers to a fiscal year ending on December 31 of that year. All references to December 2008, unless specifically stated otherwise, refer to the firm’s fiscal one month ended, or the date, as the context requires, December 26, 2008. Certain reclassifications have been made to previously reported amounts to conform to the current presentation.
Use of Estimates
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles that require management to make certain estimates and assumptions. The most important of these estimates and assumptions relate to fair value measurements, the accounting for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets and the provision for potential losses that may arise from litigation and regulatory proceedings and tax audits. Although these and other estimates and assumptions are based on the best available information, actual results could be materially different from these estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Investment Banking. Underwriting revenues and fees from mergers and acquisitions and other financial advisory assignments are recognized in the consolidated statements of earnings when the services related to the underlying transaction are completed under the terms of the engagement. Expenses associated with such transactions are deferred until the related revenue is recognized or the engagement is otherwise concluded. Underwriting revenues are presented net of related expenses. Expenses associated with financial advisory transactions are recorded as non-compensation expenses, net of client reimbursements.
Trading Assets and Trading Liabilities. Substantially all trading assets and trading liabilities are reflected in the consolidated statements of financial condition at fair value. Related gains or losses are generally recognized in “Trading and principal investments” in the consolidated statements of earnings.
Other Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities at Fair Value. In addition to trading assets, at fair value and trading liabilities, at fair value, the firm has elected to account for certain of its other financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value under ASC 815-15 and 825-10 (i.e., the fair value option). The primary reasons for electing the fair value option are to reflect economic events in earnings on a timely basis, to mitigate volatility in earnings from using different measurement attributes and to address simplification and cost-benefit considerations.
Such financial assets and financial liabilities accounted for at fair value include:
•
certain unsecured short-term borrowings, consisting of all promissory notes and commercial paper and certain hybrid financial instruments;
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
•
certain other secured financings, primarily transfers accounted for as financings rather than sales, debt raised through the firm’s William Street credit extension program and certain other nonrecourse financings;
•
certain unsecured long-term borrowings, including prepaid physical commodity transactions and certain hybrid financial instruments;
•
resale and repurchase agreements;
•
securities borrowed and loaned within Trading and Principal Investments, consisting of the firm’s matched book and certain firm financing activities;
•
certain deposits issued by the firm’s bank subsidiaries, as well as securities held by Goldman Sachs Bank USA (GS Bank USA);
•
certain receivables from customers and counterparties, including certain margin loans, transfers accounted for as secured loans rather than purchases and prepaid variable share forwards;
•
certain insurance and reinsurance contracts and certain guarantees; and
•
in general, investments acquired after November 24, 2006, when the fair value option became available, where the firm has significant influence over the investee and would otherwise apply the equity method of accounting.
Fair Value Measurements. The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e., the exit price). Financial assets are marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to offer prices. Fair value measurements do not include transaction costs.
The fair value hierarchy under ASC 820 prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Basis of Fair Value Measurement
Level 1
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2
Quoted prices in markets that are not considered to be active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly;
Level 3
Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The firm defines active markets for equity instruments based on the average daily trading volume both in absolute terms and relative to the market capitalization for the instrument. The firm defines active markets for debt instruments based on both the average daily trading volume and the number of days with trading activity.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Credit risk is an essential component of fair value. Cash products (e.g., bonds and loans) and derivative instruments (particularly those with significant future projected cash flows) trade in the market at levels which reflect credit considerations. The firm calculates the fair value of derivative assets by discounting future cash flows at a rate which incorporates counterparty credit spreads and the fair value of derivative liabilities by discounting future cash flows at a rate which incorporates the firm’s own credit spreads. In doing so, credit exposures are adjusted to reflect mitigants, namely collateral agreements which reduce exposures based on triggers and contractual posting requirements. The firm manages its exposure to credit risk as it does other market risks and will price, economically hedge, facilitate and intermediate trades which involve credit risk. The firm records liquidity valuation adjustments to reflect the cost of exiting concentrated risk positions, including exposure to the firm’s own credit spreads.
In determining fair value, the firm separates trading assets, at fair value and trading liabilities, at fair value into two categories: cash instruments and derivative contracts.
•
Cash Instruments. The firm’s cash instruments are generally classified within level 1 or level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. The types of instruments valued based on quoted market prices in active markets include most government obligations, active listed equities and certain money market securities. Such instruments are generally classified within level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Instruments classified within level 1 of the fair value hierarchy are required to be carried at quoted market prices, even in situations where the firm holds a large position and a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price.
The types of instruments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted market prices, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency include most government agency securities, most corporate bonds, certain mortgage products, certain bank loans and bridge loans, less liquid listed equities, certain state, municipal and provincial obligations and certain money market securities and loan commitments. Such instruments are generally classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Certain cash instruments are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because they trade infrequently and therefore have little or no price transparency. Such instruments include private equity investments and real estate fund investments, certain bank loans and bridge loans (including certain mezzanine financing, leveraged loans arising from capital market transactions and other corporate bank debt), less liquid corporate debt securities and other debt obligations (including less liquid corporate bonds, distressed debt instruments and collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) backed by corporate obligations), less liquid mortgage whole loans and securities (backed by either commercial or residential real estate), and acquired portfolios of distressed loans. The transaction price is initially used as the best estimate of fair value. Accordingly, when a pricing model is used to value such an instrument, the model is adjusted so that the model value at inception equals the transaction price. This valuation is adjusted only when changes to inputs and assumptions are corroborated by evidence such as transactions in similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable entities, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations and other transactions across the capital structure, offerings in the equity or debt capital markets, and changes in financial ratios or cash flows.
For positions that are not traded in active markets or are subject to transfer restrictions, valuations are adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability. Such adjustments are
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
generally based on market evidence where available. In the absence of such evidence, management’s best estimate is used.
•
Derivative Contracts. Derivative contracts can be exchange-traded or over-the-counter (OTC). Exchange-traded derivatives typically fall within level 1 or level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether they are deemed to be actively traded or not. The firm generally values exchange-traded derivatives using models which calibrate to market-clearing levels and eliminate timing differences between the closing price of the exchange-traded derivatives and their underlying instruments. In such cases, exchange-traded derivatives are classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
OTC derivatives are valued using market transactions and other market evidence whenever possible, including market-based inputs to models, model calibration to market-clearing transactions, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. Where models are used, the selection of a particular model to value an OTC derivative depends upon the contractual terms of, and specific risks inherent in, the instrument, as well as the availability of pricing information in the market. The firm generally uses similar models to value similar instruments. Valuation models require a variety of inputs, including contractual terms, market prices, yield curves, credit curves, measures of volatility, voluntary and involuntary prepayment rates, loss severity rates and correlations of such inputs. For OTC derivatives that trade in liquid markets, such as generic forwards, swaps and options, model inputs can generally be verified and model selection does not involve significant management judgment. OTC derivatives are classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy when all of the significant inputs can be corroborated to market evidence.
Certain OTC derivatives trade in less liquid markets with limited pricing information, and the determination of fair value for these derivatives is inherently more difficult. Such instruments are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Where the firm does not have corroborating market evidence to support significant model inputs and cannot verify the model to market transactions, the transaction price is initially used as the best estimate of fair value. Accordingly, when a pricing model is used to value such an instrument, the model is adjusted so that the model value at inception equals the transaction price. The valuations of these less liquid OTC derivatives are typically based on level 1 and/or level 2 inputs that can be observed in the market, as well as unobservable level 3 inputs. Subsequent to initial recognition, the firm updates the level 1 and level 2 inputs to reflect observable market changes, with resulting gains and losses reflected within level 3. Level 3 inputs are only changed when corroborated by evidence such as similar market transactions, third-party pricing services and/or broker or dealer quotations, or other empirical market data. In circumstances where the firm cannot verify the model value to market transactions, it is possible that a different valuation model could produce a materially different estimate of fair value.
When appropriate, valuations are adjusted for various factors such as liquidity, bid/offer spreads and credit considerations. Such adjustments are generally based on market evidence where available. In the absence of such evidence, management’s best estimate is used.
Collateralized Agreements and Financings. Collateralized agreements consist of resale agreements and securities borrowed. Collateralized financings consist of repurchase agreements, securities loaned and other secured financings. Interest on collateralized agreements and collateralized financings is recognized in “Interest income” and “Interest expense,” respectively, in the consolidated statements of earnings over the life of the transaction. Collateralized agreements and financings are presented on a net-by-counterparty basis when a right of setoff exists.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
•
Resale and Repurchase Agreements. Securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, principally U.S. government, federal agency and investment-grade sovereign obligations, represent collateralized financing transactions. The firm receives securities purchased under agreements to resell, makes delivery of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, monitors the market value of these securities on a daily basis and delivers or obtains additional collateral as appropriate. As noted above, resale and repurchase agreements are carried in the consolidated statements of financial condition at fair value under the fair value option. Resale and repurchase agreements are generally valued based on inputs with reasonable levels of price transparency and are generally classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
•
Securities Borrowed and Loaned. Securities borrowed and loaned are generally collateralized by cash, securities or letters of credit. The firm receives securities borrowed, makes delivery of securities loaned, monitors the market value of securities borrowed and loaned, and delivers or obtains additional collateral as appropriate. Securities borrowed and loaned within Securities Services, relating to both customer activities and, to a lesser extent, certain firm financing activities, are recorded based on the amount of cash collateral advanced or received plus accrued interest. As these arrangements generally can be terminated on demand, they exhibit little, if any, sensitivity to changes in interest rates. As noted above, securities borrowed and loaned within Trading and Principal Investments, which are related to the firm’s matched book and certain firm financing activities, are recorded at fair value under the fair value option. These securities borrowed and loaned transactions are generally valued based on inputs with reasonable levels of price transparency and are classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
•
Other Secured Financings. In addition to repurchase agreements and securities loaned, the firm funds assets through the use of other secured financing arrangements and pledges financial instruments and other assets as collateral in these transactions. As noted above, the firm has elected to apply the fair value option to transfers accounted for as financings rather than sales, debt raised through the firm’s William Street credit extension program and certain other nonrecourse financings, for which the use of fair value eliminates non-economic volatility in earnings that would arise from using different measurement attributes. These other secured financing transactions are generally classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Other secured financings that are not recorded at fair value are recorded based on the amount of cash received plus accrued interest. See Note 3 for further information regarding other secured financings.
Hybrid Financial Instruments. Hybrid financial instruments are instruments that contain bifurcatable embedded derivatives and do not require settlement by physical delivery of non-financial assets (e.g., physical commodities). If the firm elects to bifurcate the embedded derivative from the associated debt, it is accounted for at fair value and the host contract is accounted for at amortized cost, adjusted for the effective portion of any fair value hedge accounting relationships. If the firm does not elect to bifurcate, the entire hybrid financial instrument is accounted for at fair value under the fair value option. See Notes 3 and 6 for further information regarding hybrid financial instruments.
Transfers of Financial Assets. In general, transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales when the firm has relinquished control over the transferred assets. For transfers accounted for as sales, any related gains or losses are recognized in net revenues. Transfers that are not accounted for as sales are accounted for as collateralized financings, with the related interest expense recognized in net revenues over the life of the transaction. See “- Recent Accounting Developments” below for information regarding amendments to accounting for transfers of financial assets.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Commissions. Commission revenues from executing and clearing client transactions on stock, options and futures markets are recognized in “Trading and principal investments” in the consolidated statements of earnings on a trade-date basis.
Insurance Activities. Certain of the firm’s insurance and reinsurance contracts are accounted for at fair value under the fair value option, with changes in fair value included in “Trading and principal investments” in the consolidated statements of earnings.
Revenues from variable annuity and life insurance and reinsurance contracts not accounted for at fair value generally consist of fees assessed on contract holder account balances for mortality charges, policy administration fees and surrender charges, and are recognized in “Trading and principal investments” in the consolidated statements of earnings in the period that services are provided.
Interest credited to variable annuity and life insurance and reinsurance contract account balances and changes in reserves are recognized in “Other expenses” in the consolidated statements of earnings.
Premiums earned for underwriting property catastrophe reinsurance are recognized in “Trading and principal investments” in the consolidated statements of earnings over the coverage period, net of premiums ceded for the cost of reinsurance. Expenses for liabilities related to property catastrophe reinsurance claims, including estimates of losses that have been incurred but not reported, are recognized in “Other expenses” in the consolidated statements of earnings.
Merchant Banking Overrides. The firm is entitled to receive merchant banking overrides (i.e., an increased share of a fund’s income and gains) when the return on the funds’ investments exceeds certain threshold returns. Overrides are based on investment performance over the life of each merchant banking fund, and future investment underperformance may require amounts of override previously distributed to the firm to be returned to the funds. Accordingly, overrides are recognized in the consolidated statements of earnings only when all material contingencies have been resolved. Overrides are included in “Trading and principal investments” in the consolidated statements of earnings.
Asset Management. Management fees are recognized over the period that the related service is provided based upon average net asset values. In certain circumstances, the firm is also entitled to receive incentive fees based on a percentage of a fund’s return or when the return on assets under management exceeds specified benchmark returns or other performance targets. Incentive fees are generally based on investment performance over a 12-month period and are subject to adjustment prior to the end of the measurement period. Accordingly, incentive fees are recognized in the consolidated statements of earnings when the measurement period ends. Asset management fees and incentive fees are included in “Asset management and securities services” in the consolidated statements of earnings.
Share-Based Compensation
The cost of employee services received in exchange for a share-based award is generally measured based on the grant-date fair value of the award in accordance with ASC 718. Share-based awards that do not require future service (i.e., vested awards, including awards granted to retirement-eligible employees) are expensed immediately. Share-based employee awards that require future service are amortized over the relevant service period. Expected forfeitures are included in determining share-based employee compensation expense.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The firm pays cash dividend equivalents on outstanding restricted stock units (RSUs). Dividend equivalents paid on RSUs are generally charged to retained earnings. Dividend equivalents paid on RSUs expected to be forfeited are included in compensation expense. In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the firm adopted amended accounting principles related to income tax benefits of dividends on share-based payment awards (ASC 718). These amended principles require the tax benefit related to dividend equivalents paid on RSUs to be accounted for as an increase to additional paid-in capital. Previously, the firm accounted for this tax benefit as a reduction to income tax expense. See “- Recent Accounting Developments” below for further information on these amended principles.
In certain cases, primarily related to the death of an employee or conflicted employment (as outlined in the applicable award agreements), the firm may cash settle share-based compensation awards. For awards accounted for as equity instruments, additional paid-in capital is adjusted to the extent of the difference between the current value of the award and the grant-date value of the award.
Goodwill
Goodwill is the cost of acquired companies in excess of the fair value of identifiable net assets at acquisition date. Goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment. An impairment loss is recognized if the estimated fair value of an operating segment, which is a component one level below the firm’s three business segments, is less than its estimated net book value. Such loss is calculated as the difference between the estimated fair value of goodwill and its carrying value.
Identifiable Intangible Assets
Identifiable intangible assets, which consist primarily of customer lists, New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Designated Market Maker (DMM) rights and the value of business acquired (VOBA) in the firm’s insurance subsidiaries, are amortized over their estimated lives or, in the case of insurance contracts, in proportion to estimated gross profits or premium revenues. Identifiable intangible assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that an asset’s or asset group’s carrying value may not be fully recoverable. An impairment loss, generally calculated as the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying value of an asset or asset group, is recognized if the sum of the estimated undiscounted cash flows relating to the asset or asset group is less than the corresponding carrying value.
Property, Leasehold Improvements and Equipment
Property, leasehold improvements and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization, are recorded at cost and included in “Other assets” in the consolidated statements of financial condition.
Substantially all property and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the asset. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the improvement or the term of the lease, whichever is shorter. Certain costs of software developed or obtained for internal use are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the software.
Property, leasehold improvements and equipment are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that an asset’s or asset group’s carrying value may not be fully recoverable. An impairment loss, calculated as the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying value of an asset or asset group, is recognized if the sum of the expected undiscounted cash flows relating to the asset or asset group is less than the corresponding carrying value.
The firm’s operating leases include office space held in excess of current requirements. Rent expense relating to space held for growth is included in “Occupancy” in the consolidated statements of
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
earnings. The firm records a liability, based on the fair value of the remaining lease rentals reduced by any potential or existing sublease rentals, for leases where the firm has ceased using the space and management has concluded that the firm will not derive any future economic benefits. Costs to terminate a lease before the end of its term are recognized and measured at fair value upon termination.
Foreign Currency Translation
Assets and liabilities denominated in non-U.S. currencies are translated at rates of exchange prevailing on the date of the consolidated statements of financial condition, and revenues and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange for the period. Gains or losses on translation of the financial statements of a non-U.S. operation, when the functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar, are included, net of hedges and taxes, in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. The firm seeks to reduce its net investment exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates through the use of foreign currency forward contracts and foreign currency-denominated debt. For foreign currency forward contracts, hedge effectiveness is assessed based on changes in forward exchange rates; accordingly, forward points are reflected as a component of the currency translation adjustment in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. For foreign currency-denominated debt, hedge effectiveness is assessed based on changes in spot rates. Foreign currency remeasurement gains or losses on transactions in nonfunctional currencies are included in the consolidated statements of earnings.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are provided for using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of the firm’s assets and liabilities. Valuation allowances are established to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that more likely than not will be realized. The firm’s tax assets and liabilities are presented as a component of “Other assets” and “Other liabilities and accrued expenses,” respectively, in the consolidated statements of financial condition. The firm adopted amended accounting principles related to the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes (ASC 740) as of December 1, 2007, and recorded a transition adjustment resulting in a reduction of $201 million to beginning retained earnings in the first fiscal quarter of 2008. The firm recognizes tax positions in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination by the relevant taxing authority based on the technical merits of the position. A position that meets this standard is measured at the largest amount of benefit that will more likely than not be realized upon settlement. A liability is established for differences between positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the financial statements. The firm reports interest expense related to income tax matters in “Provision for taxes” in the consolidated statements of earnings and income tax penalties in “Other expenses” in the consolidated statements of earnings.
Earnings Per Common Share (EPS)
Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net earnings applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Common shares outstanding includes common stock and RSUs for which no future service is required as a condition to the delivery of the underlying common stock. Diluted EPS includes the determinants of basic EPS and, in addition, reflects the dilutive effect of the common stock deliverable pursuant to stock warrants and options and to RSUs for which future service is required as a condition to the delivery of the underlying common stock. In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the firm adopted amended accounting principles related to determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
securities. Accordingly, the firm treats unvested share-based payment awards that have non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents as a separate class of securities in calculating earnings per common share. See “- Recent Accounting Developments” below for further information on these amended principles.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The firm defines cash equivalents as highly liquid overnight deposits held in the ordinary course of business. As of December 2009 and November 2008, “Cash and cash equivalents” on the consolidated statements of financial condition included $4.45 billion and $5.60 billion, respectively, of cash and due from banks and $33.84 billion and $10.14 billion, respectively, of interest-bearing deposits with banks.
Recent Accounting Developments
FASB Accounting Standards Codification. In July 2009, the FASB launched the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification) as the single source of GAAP. While the Codification did not change GAAP, it introduced a new structure to the accounting literature and changed references to accounting standards and other authoritative accounting guidance. The Codification was effective for the firm for the third quarter of fiscal 2009 and did not have an effect on the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards (ASC 718). In June 2007, the FASB issued amended accounting principles related to income tax benefits of dividends on share-based payment awards, which require that the tax benefit related to dividend equivalents paid on RSUs, which are expected to vest, be recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital. The firm previously accounted for this tax benefit as a reduction to income tax expense. These amended accounting principles were applied prospectively for tax benefits on dividend equivalents declared beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Adoption did not have a material effect on the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions (ASC 860). In February 2008, the FASB issued amended accounting principles related to transfers of financial assets and repurchase financing transactions. These amended principles require an initial transfer of a financial asset and a repurchase financing that was entered into contemporaneously or in contemplation of the initial transfer to be evaluated as a linked transaction (for purposes of determining whether a sale has occurred) unless certain criteria are met, including that the transferred asset must be readily obtainable in the marketplace. The firm adopted these amended accounting principles for new transactions entered into after November 2008. Adoption did not have a material effect on the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (ASC 815). In March 2008, the FASB issued amended principles related to disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities, which were effective for the firm beginning in the one month ended December 2008. Since these amended principles require only additional disclosures concerning derivatives and hedging activities, adoption did not affect the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (ASC 260). In June 2008, the FASB issued amended accounting principles related to determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities. These amended principles require companies to treat unvested share-based
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
payment awards that have non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents as a separate class of securities in calculating earnings per common share under the two-class method. The firm adopted these amended accounting principles in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The impact to basic earnings per common share for the year ended December 2009 was a reduction of $0.06 per common share. There was no impact on diluted earnings per common share for the year ended December 2009. Prior periods have not been restated due to immateriality.
Business Combinations (ASC 805). In December 2007, the FASB issued amended accounting principles related to business combinations, which changed the accounting for transaction costs, certain contingent assets and liabilities, and other balances in a business combination. In addition, in partial acquisitions, when control is obtained, the amended principles require that the acquiring company measure and record all of the target’s assets and liabilities, including goodwill, at fair value as if the entire target company had been acquired. These amended accounting principles applied to the firm’s business combinations beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Adoption did not affect the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, but may have an effect on accounting for future business combinations.
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (ASC 810). In December 2007, the FASB issued amended accounting principles related to noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements, which require that ownership interests in consolidated subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent (i.e., noncontrolling interests) be accounted for and presented as equity, rather than as a liability or mezzanine equity. These amended accounting principles were effective for the firm beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Adoption did not have a material effect on the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities (ASC 860 and 810). In December 2008, the FASB issued amended principles related to disclosures by public entities (enterprises) about transfers of financial assets and interests in variable interest entities, which were effective for the firm beginning in the one month ended December 2008. Since these amended principles require only additional disclosures concerning transfers of financial assets and interests in VIEs, adoption did not affect the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock (ASC 815). In June 2008, the FASB issued amended accounting principles related to determining whether an instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s own stock. These amended accounting principles provide guidance about whether an instrument (such as the firm’s outstanding common stock warrants) should be classified as equity and not subsequently recorded at fair value. The firm adopted these amended accounting principles in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Adoption did not affect the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (ASC 820). In April 2009, the FASB issued amended accounting principles related to determining fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased and identifying transactions that are not orderly. Specifically, these amended principles list factors which should be evaluated to determine whether a transaction is orderly, clarify that adjustments to transactions or quoted prices may be necessary when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have decreased significantly, and provide guidance for determining the concurrent weighting of the transaction price relative to fair value indications from other valuation techniques when estimating fair value. The firm adopted these amended accounting principles in the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Since the firm’s fair value methodologies were consistent with these amended accounting principles, adoption did not affect the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (ASC 320). In April 2009, the FASB issued amended accounting principles related to recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments. These amended principles prescribe that only the portion of an other-than-temporary impairment on a debt security related to credit loss is recognized in current period earnings, with the remainder recognized in other comprehensive income, if the holder does not intend to sell the security and it is more likely than not that the holder will not be required to sell the security prior to recovery. Previously, the entire other-than-temporary impairment was recognized in current period earnings. The firm adopted these amended accounting principles in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Adoption did not have a material effect on the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (ASC 825). In April 2009, the FASB issued amended principles related to interim disclosures about fair value of financial instruments. The firm adopted these amended principles in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Adoption did not affect the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities (ASC 860 and 810). In June 2009, the FASB issued amended accounting principles which change the accounting for securitizations and VIEs. These principles were codified as Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-16, “Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) - Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets” and ASU No. 2009-17, “Consolidations (Topic 810) - Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities” in December 2009. ASU No. 2009-16 eliminates the concept of a QSPE, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions and continuing involvement with transferred financial assets. ASU No. 2009-17 changes the determination of when a VIE should be consolidated. Under ASU No. 2009-17, the determination of whether to consolidate a VIE is based on the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance together with either the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be significant to the VIE, as well as the VIE’s purpose and design. ASU No. 2009-16 and 2009-17 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. In February 2010, the FASB finalized a standard which defers the requirements of ASU No. 2009-17 for certain interests in investment funds and certain similar entities. Adoption of ASU Nos. 2009-16 and 2009-17 on January 1, 2010 did not have a material effect on the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, continued application of these principles requires the firm to make judgments that are subject to change based on new facts and circumstances, and evolving interpretations and practices.
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures - Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value (ASC 820). In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-05, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) - Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value.” ASU No. 2009-05 provides guidance in measuring liabilities when a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available and clarifies that a reporting entity should not make an adjustment to fair value for a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The firm adopted ASU No. 2009-05 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. Since the firm’s fair value methodologies were consistent with ASU No. 2009-5, adoption did not affect the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent) (ASC 820). In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-12, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) - Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent).” ASU No. 2009-12 provides guidance about using net asset value to measure the fair value of interests in certain investment funds and requires additional disclosures about interests in investment funds. The firm adopted ASU No. 2009-12 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. Since the firm’s fair value methodologies were consistent with ASU No. 2009-12, adoption did not affect the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (ASC 820). In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) - Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” ASU No. 2010-06 provides amended disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements. ASU No. 2010-06 is effective for financial statements issued for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 for certain disclosures and for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010 for other disclosures. Since these amended principles require only additional disclosures concerning fair value measurements, adoption will not affect the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 3.
Financial Instruments
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following table sets forth the firm’s trading assets, at fair value, including those pledged as collateral, and trading liabilities, at fair value. At any point in time, the firm may use cash instruments as well as derivatives to manage a long or short risk position.
(1)
Includes $4.31 billion and $4.40 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively, of money market instruments held by William Street Funding Corporation (Funding Corp.) to support the William Street credit extension program. See Note 8 for further information regarding the William Street credit extension program.
(2)
Net of cash received pursuant to credit support agreements of $124.60 billion and $137.16 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively.
(3)
Includes $3.86 billion and $1.68 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively, of securities held within the firm’s insurance subsidiaries which are accounted for as available-for-sale.
(4)
Consists of the fair value of unfunded commitments to extend credit. The fair value of partially funded commitments is included in trading assets, at fair value.
(5)
Net of cash paid pursuant to credit support agreements of $14.74 billion and $34.01 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair Value Hierarchy
The firm’s financial assets at fair value classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are summarized below:
(1)
Excludes assets which are financed by nonrecourse debt, attributable to minority investors or attributable to employee interests in certain consolidated funds.
The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy trading assets, at fair value, trading liabilities, at fair value, and other financial assets and financial liabilities accounted for at fair value under the fair value option as of December 2009 and November 2008. See Note 2 for further information on the fair value hierarchy. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(1)
Includes $291 million and $311 million of CDOs and collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) backed by real estate within level 2 and level 3, respectively, of the fair value hierarchy.
(2)
Consists of acquired portfolios of distressed loans, primarily backed by commercial and residential real estate collateral.
(3)
Includes $338 million and $741 million of CDOs and CLOs backed by corporate obligations within level 2 and level 3, respectively, of the fair value hierarchy.
(4)
Consists of level 3 assets which are financed by nonrecourse debt, attributable to minority investors or attributable to employee interests in certain consolidated funds.
(5)
Consists of publicly listed equity securities.
(6)
Principally consists of U.S. Department of the Treasury (U.S. Treasury) securities and money market instruments as well as insurance separate account assets measured at fair value.
(7)
Substantially all of the firm’s level 2 equities and convertible debentures are less liquid publicly listed securities.
(8)
Includes $31.44 billion and $9.58 billion of credit derivative assets within level 2 and level 3, respectively, of the fair value hierarchy. These amounts exclude the effects of netting under enforceable netting agreements across other derivative product types.
(9)
Principally consists of securities borrowed and resale agreements. The underlying securities have been segregated to satisfy certain regulatory requirements.
(10)
Substantially all consists of private equity investments and real estate fund investments. Includes $10.56 billion of private equity investments, $1.23 billion of real estate investments and $79 million of convertible debentures.
(11)
Represents cash collateral and the impact of netting across the levels of the fair value hierarchy. Netting among positions classified within the same level is included in that level.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(1)
Includes $45 million of CDOs and CLOs backed by corporate obligations within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
(2)
Substantially all consists of publicly listed equity securities.
(3)
Includes $7.96 billion and $3.20 billion of credit derivative liabilities within level 2 and level 3, respectively, of the fair value hierarchy. These amounts exclude the effects of netting under enforceable netting agreements across other derivative product types.
(4)
Level 3 liabilities were 6.6% of Total financial liabilities at fair value.
(5)
Represents cash collateral and the impact of netting across the levels of the fair value hierarchy. Netting among positions classified within the same level is included in that level.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(1)
Consists of level 3 assets which are financed by nonrecourse debt, attributable to minority investors or attributable to employee interests in certain consolidated funds.
(2)
Consists of U.S. Treasury securities and money market instruments as well as insurance separate account assets measured at fair value.
(3)
Includes $66.00 billion and $8.32 billion of credit derivative assets within level 2 and level 3, respectively, of the fair value hierarchy. These amounts exclude the effects of netting under enforceable netting agreements across other derivative product types.
(4)
Principally consists of securities borrowed and resale agreements. The underlying securities have been segregated to satisfy certain regulatory requirements.
(5)
Substantially all consists of private equity investments and real estate fund investments.
(6)
Represents cash collateral and the impact of netting across the levels of the fair value hierarchy. Netting among positions classified within the same level is included in that level.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(1)
Includes $31.20 billion and $4.74 billion of credit derivative liabilities within level 2 and level 3, respectively, of the fair value hierarchy. These amounts exclude the effects of netting under enforceable netting agreements across other derivative product types.
(2)
Level 3 liabilities were 7.0% of Total financial liabilities at fair value.
(3)
Represents cash collateral and the impact of netting across the levels of the fair value hierarchy. Netting among positions classified within the same level is included in that level.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Level 3 Unrealized Gains/(Losses)
The table below sets forth a summary of unrealized gains/(losses) on the firm’s level 3 financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value still held at the reporting date for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007 and one month ended December 2008:
Cash Instruments
The net unrealized loss on level 3 cash instruments of $4.31 billion for the year ended December 2009 primarily consisted of unrealized losses on private equity investments and real estate fund investments, and loans and securities backed by commercial real estate, reflecting weakness in these less liquid asset classes. The net unrealized loss on level 3 cash instruments of $12.36 billion for the year ended November 2008 primarily consisted of unrealized losses on loans and securities backed by commercial real estate, certain bank loans and bridge loans, private equity investments and real estate fund investments. The net unrealized loss on level 3 cash instruments of $3.19 billion for the one month ended December 2008 primarily consisted of unrealized losses on certain bank loans and bridge loans, private equity investments and real estate fund investments, and loans and securities backed by commercial real estate. Losses during December 2008 reflected the weakness in the global credit and equity markets.
Level 3 cash instruments are frequently economically hedged with instruments classified within level 1 and level 2, and accordingly, gains or losses that have been reported in level 3 can be partially offset by gains or losses attributable to instruments classified within level 1 or level 2 or by gains or losses on derivative contracts classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Derivative Contracts
The net unrealized loss on level 3 derivative contracts of $1.02 billion for the year ended December 2009 was primarily attributable to tighter credit spreads on the underlying instruments and increases in underlying equity index prices, partially offset by increases in commodities prices (all of which are level 2 observable inputs). The net unrealized gain on level 3 derivative contracts of $5.58 billion for the year ended November 2008 was primarily attributable to changes in observable credit spreads (which are level 2 inputs) on the underlying instruments. The net unrealized loss on level 3 derivative contracts of $210 million for the one month ended December 2008 was primarily attributable to changes in observable prices on the underlying instruments (which are level 2 inputs). Level 3 gains and losses on derivative contracts should be considered in the context of the following:
•
A derivative contract with level 1 and/or level 2 inputs is classified as a level 3 financial instrument in its entirety if it has at least one significant level 3 input.
•
If there is one significant level 3 input, the entire gain or loss from adjusting only observable inputs (i.e., level 1 and level 2) is still classified as level 3.
•
Gains or losses that have been reported in level 3 resulting from changes in level 1 or level 2 inputs are frequently offset by gains or losses attributable to instruments classified within level 1 or level 2 or by cash instruments reported within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The tables below set forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the firm’s level 3 financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value for the years ended December 2009 and November 2008 and one month ended December 2008. The tables reflect gains and losses, including gains and losses for the entire period on financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value that were transferred to level 3 during the period, for all financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value categorized as level 3 as of December 2009, November 2008 and December 2008, respectively. The tables do not include gains or losses that were reported in level 3 in prior periods for instruments that were sold or transferred out of level 3 prior to the end of the period presented.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(1)
The aggregate amounts include approximately $(4.69) billion and $1.64 billion reported in “Trading and principal investments” and “Interest income,” respectively, in the consolidated statements of earnings for the year ended December 2009.
(2)
Substantially all is reported in “Trading and principal investments” in the consolidated statements of earnings.
(3)
Principally resulted from changes in level 2 inputs.
(4)
Principally reflects the deconsolidation of certain loan portfolios for which the firm did not bear economic exposure.
(5)
Principally reflects transfers to level 2 within the fair value hierarchy of certain private equity investments, reflecting improved transparency of prices for these financial instruments, primarily as a result of market transactions.
(6)
Principally reflects transfers from level 3 unsecured short-term borrowings to level 3 other secured financings and level 3 unsecured long-term borrowings related to changes in the terms of certain notes.
(7)
Principally reflects transfers from level 2 within the fair value hierarchy of certain insurance contracts, reflecting reduced transparency of mortality curve inputs used to value these instruments as a result of less observable trading activity.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(1)
The aggregate amounts include approximately $(11.54) billion and $1.98 billion reported in “Trading and principal investments” and “Interest income,” respectively, in the consolidated statements of earnings for the year ended November 2008.
(2)
Substantially all is reported in “Trading and principal investments” in the consolidated statements of earnings.
(3)
Principally resulted from changes in level 2 inputs.
(4)
Principally reflects transfers from level 2 within the fair value hierarchy of loans and securities backed by commercial real estate, reflecting reduced price transparency for these financial instruments.
(5)
Principally reflects transfers to level 2 within the fair value hierarchy of mortgage-related derivative assets, as recent trading activity provided improved transparency of correlation inputs. This decrease was partially offset by transfers from level 2 within the fair value hierarchy of credit and equity-linked derivatives due to reduced price transparency.
(6)
Consists of transfers from level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
(1)
The aggregate amounts include approximately $(3.18) billion and $221 million reported in “Trading and principal investments” and “Interest income,” respectively, in the consolidated statements of earnings for the one month ended December 2008.
(2)
Substantially all is reported in “Trading and principal investments” in the consolidated statements of earnings.
(3)
Principally resulted from changes in level 2 inputs.
(4)
Principally reflects transfers from level 2 within the fair value hierarchy of certain corporate debt securities and other debt obligations and loans and securities backed by commercial real estate, reflecting reduced price transparency for these financial instruments.
(5)
Principally reflects transfers to level 2 within the fair value hierarchy of credit-related derivative assets, due to improved transparency of correlation inputs used to value these financial instruments.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Impact of Credit Spreads
On an ongoing basis, the firm realizes gains or losses relating to changes in credit risk on derivative contracts through changes in credit mitigants or the sale or unwind of the contracts. The net gain/(loss) attributable to the impact of changes in credit exposure and credit spreads on derivative contracts (including derivative assets and liabilities and related hedges) was $572 million, $(137) million, $86 million and $(188) million for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007 and one month ended December 2008, respectively.
The following table sets forth the net gains/(losses) attributable to the impact of changes in the firm’s own credit spreads on borrowings for which the fair value option was elected. The firm calculates the fair value of borrowings by discounting future cash flows at a rate which incorporates the firm’s observable credit spreads.
The net gain/(loss) attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit spreads on loans and loan commitments for which the fair value option was elected was $1.65 billion, $(4.61) billion and $(2.06) billion for the years ended December 2009 and November 2008 and one month ended December 2008, respectively. Such gains/(losses) were not material for the year ended November 2007. The firm attributes changes in the fair value of floating rate loans and loan commitments to changes in instrument-specific credit spreads. For fixed rate loans and loan commitments, the firm allocates changes in fair value between interest rate-related changes and credit spread-related changes based on changes in interest rates. See below for additional details regarding the fair value option.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Fair Value Option
Gains/(Losses)
The following table sets forth the gains/(losses) included in earnings for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007 and one month ended December 2008 as a result of the firm electing to apply the fair value option to certain financial assets and financial liabilities, as described in Note 2. The table excludes gains and losses related to (i) trading assets, at fair value, and trading liabilities, at fair value, (ii) gains and losses on assets and liabilities that would have been accounted for at fair value under other GAAP if the firm had not elected the fair value option, and (iii) gains and losses on secured financings related to transfers of financial assets accounted for as financings rather than sales, as such gains and losses are offset by gains and losses on the related financial assets.
(1)
Excludes gains/(losses) of $(4.15) billion, $2.42 billion, $(2.18) billion and $(623) million for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007 and one month ended December 2008, respectively, related to the embedded derivative component of hybrid financial instruments. Such gains and losses would have been recognized even if the firm had not elected to account for the entire hybrid instrument at fair value under the fair value option.
(2)
Excludes gains of $48 million, $1.29 billion and $2.19 billion for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007, respectively, related to financings recorded as a result of transactions that were accounted for as secured financings rather than sales. Changes in the fair value of these secured financings are offset by changes in the fair value of the related financial instruments included in “Trading assets, at fair value” in the consolidated statements of financial condition. Such gains/(losses) were not material for the one month ended December 2008.
(3)
Excludes gains/(losses) of $(3.15) billion, $6.37 billion, $(1.07) billion and $92 million for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007 and one month ended December 2008, respectively, related to the embedded derivative component of hybrid financial instruments. Such gains and losses would have been recognized even if the firm had not elected to account for the entire hybrid instrument at fair value under the fair value option.
(4)
Primarily consists of gains/(losses) on certain reinsurance contracts.
(5)
Primarily consists of gains/(losses) on certain insurance and reinsurance contracts.
(6)
Primarily consists of gains/(losses) on resale and repurchase agreements, and securities borrowed and loaned within Trading and Principal Investments.
(7)
Reported in “Trading and principal investments” in the consolidated statements of earnings. The amounts exclude contractual interest, which is included in “Interest income” and “Interest expense” in the consolidated statements of earnings, for all instruments other than hybrid financial instruments.
All trading assets and trading liabilities are accounted for at fair value either under the fair value option or as required by other accounting standards (principally ASC 320, ASC 940 and ASC 815). Excluding equities commissions of $3.84 billion, $5.00 billion, $4.58 billion and $251 million for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007 and one month ended December 2008, respectively, and the gains and losses on the instruments accounted for under the fair value option described above, “Trading and principal investments” in the consolidated statements of earnings primarily represents gains and losses on “Trading assets, at fair value” and “Trading liabilities, at fair value” in the consolidated statements of financial condition.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Loans and Loan Commitments
As of December 2009, the aggregate contractual principal amount of loans and long-term receivables for which the fair value option was elected exceeded the related fair value by $41.96 billion, including a difference of $36.30 billion related to loans with an aggregate fair value of $4.28 billion that were on nonaccrual status (including loans more than 90 days past due). As of November 2008, the aggregate contractual principal amount of loans and long-term receivables for which the fair value option was elected exceeded the related fair value by $50.21 billion, including a difference of $37.46 billion related to loans with an aggregate fair value of $3.77 billion that were on nonaccrual status (including loans more than 90 days past due). The aggregate contractual principal exceeds the related fair value primarily because the firm regularly purchases loans, such as distressed loans, at values significantly below contractual principal amounts.
As of December 2009 and November 2008, the fair value of unfunded lending commitments for which the fair value option was elected was a liability of $879 million and $3.52 billion, respectively, and the related total contractual amount of these lending commitments was $44.05 billion and $39.49 billion, respectively.
Long-term Debt Instruments
The aggregate contractual principal amount of long-term debt instruments (principal and non-principal protected) for which the fair value option was elected exceeded the related fair value by $752 million and $2.42 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Investments in Funds That Calculate Net Asset Value Per Share
The firm’s investments in funds that calculate net asset value per share primarily consist of investments in firm-sponsored funds where the firm co-invests with third-party investors. The private equity, private debt and real estate funds are primarily closed-end funds in which the firm’s investments are not eligible for redemption. Distributions will be received from these funds as the underlying assets are liquidated and it is estimated that substantially all of the underlying assets of these existing funds will be liquidated over the next 10 years. The firm’s investments in hedge funds are generally redeemable on a quarterly basis with 91 days notice, subject to a maximum redemption level of 25% of the firm’s initial investments at any quarter-end. The following table sets forth the fair value of the firm’s investments in and unfunded commitments to funds that calculate net asset value per share:
(1)
These funds primarily invest in a broad range of industries worldwide in a variety of situations, including leveraged buy-outs, recapitalizations, and growth investments.
(2)
These funds generally invest in fixed income instruments and an associated equity component and are focused on providing private high-yield capital for mid to large-sized leveraged and management buyout transactions, recapitalizations, financings, refinancings, acquisitions and restructurings for private equity firms, private family companies and corporate issuers.
(3)
These funds are primarily multi-disciplinary hedge funds that employ a fundamental bottom-up investment approach across various asset classes and strategies including long/short equity, credit, convertibles, risk arbitrage, special situations and capital structure arbitrage.
(4)
These funds invest globally, primarily in real estate companies, loan portfolios, debt recapitalizations and direct property.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Credit Concentrations
Credit concentrations may arise from trading, investing, underwriting, lending and securities borrowing activities and may be impacted by changes in economic, industry or political factors. The firm seeks to mitigate credit risk by actively monitoring exposures and obtaining collateral as deemed appropriate. While the firm’s activities expose it to many different industries and counterparties, the firm routinely executes a high volume of transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, clearing houses, exchanges and investment funds. This has resulted in significant credit concentration with respect to this industry. In the ordinary course of business, the firm may also be subject to a concentration of credit risk to a particular counterparty, borrower or issuer, including sovereign issuers, or to a particular clearing house or exchange.
As of December 2009 and November 2008, the firm held $83.83 billion (10% of total assets) and $53.98 billion (6% of total assets), respectively, of U.S. government and federal agency obligations included in “Trading assets, at fair value” and “Cash and securities segregated for regulatory and other purposes” in the consolidated statements of financial condition. As of December 2009 and November 2008, the firm held $38.61 billion (5% of total assets) and $21.13 billion (2% of total assets), respectively, of other sovereign obligations, principally consisting of securities issued by the governments of the United Kingdom and Japan. In addition, as of December 2009 and November 2008, $87.63 billion and $126.27 billion of the firm’s securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities borrowed (including those in “Cash and securities segregated for regulatory and other purposes”), respectively, were collateralized by U.S. government and federal agency obligations. As of December 2009 and November 2008, $77.99 billion and $65.37 billion of the firm’s securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities borrowed, respectively, were collateralized by other sovereign obligations, principally consisting of securities issued by the governments of Germany, the United Kingdom and Japan. As of December 2009 and November 2008, the firm did not have credit exposure to any other counterparty that exceeded 2% of the firm’s total assets.
Derivative Activities
Derivative contracts are instruments, such as futures, forwards, swaps or option contracts, that derive their value from underlying assets, indices, reference rates or a combination of these factors. Derivative instruments may be privately negotiated contracts, which are often referred to as OTC derivatives, or they may be listed and traded on an exchange. Derivatives may involve future commitments to purchase or sell financial instruments or commodities, or to exchange currency or interest payment streams. The amounts exchanged are based on the specific terms of the contract with reference to specified rates, securities, commodities, currencies or indices.
Certain cash instruments, such as mortgage-backed securities, interest-only and principal-only obligations, and indexed debt instruments, are not considered derivatives even though their values or contractually required cash flows are derived from the price of some other security or index. However, certain commodity-related contracts are included in the firm’s derivatives disclosure, as these contracts may be settled in cash or the assets to be delivered under the contract are readily convertible into cash.
The firm enters into derivative transactions to facilitate client transactions, to take proprietary positions and as a means of risk management. Risk exposures are managed through diversification, by controlling position sizes and by entering into offsetting positions. For example, the firm may manage the risk related to a portfolio of common stock by entering into an offsetting position in a related equity-index futures contract.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The firm applies hedge accounting to certain derivative contracts. The firm uses these derivatives to manage certain interest rate and currency exposures, including the firm’s net investment in non-U.S. operations. The firm designates certain interest rate swap contracts as fair value hedges. These interest rate swap contracts hedge changes in the relevant benchmark interest rate (e.g., London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)), effectively converting a substantial portion of the firm’s unsecured long-term borrowings, certain unsecured short-term borrowings and certificates of deposit into floating rate obligations. See Note 2 for information regarding the firm’s accounting policy for foreign currency forward contracts used to hedge its net investment in non-U.S. operations.
The firm applies a long-haul method to all of its hedge accounting relationships to perform an ongoing assessment of the effectiveness of these relationships in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or offsetting cash flows attributable to the risk being hedged. The firm utilizes a dollar-offset method, which compares the change in the fair value of the hedging instrument to the change in the fair value of the hedged item, excluding the effect of the passage of time, to prospectively and retrospectively assess hedge effectiveness under the long-haul method. The firm’s prospective dollar-offset assessment utilizes scenario analyses to test hedge effectiveness via simulations of numerous parallel and slope shifts of the relevant yield curve. Parallel shifts change the interest rate of all maturities by identical amounts. Slope shifts change the curvature of the yield curve. For both the prospective assessment, in response to each of the simulated yield curve shifts, and the retrospective assessment, a hedging relationship is deemed to be effective if the fair value of the hedging instrument and the hedged item change inversely within a range of 80% to 125%.
For fair value hedges, gains or losses on derivative transactions are recognized in “Interest expense” in the consolidated statements of earnings. The change in fair value of the hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged is reported as an adjustment to its carrying value and is subsequently amortized into interest expense over its remaining life. Gains or losses related to hedge ineffectiveness for these hedges are included in “Interest expense” in the consolidated statements of earnings. These gains or losses were not material for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007 or the one month ended December 2008. Gains and losses on derivatives used for trading purposes are included in “Trading and principal investments” in the consolidated statements of earnings.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value of the firm’s derivative contracts is reflected net of cash paid or received pursuant to credit support agreements and is reported on a net-by-counterparty basis in the firm’s consolidated statements of financial condition when management believes a legal right of setoff exists under an enforceable netting agreement. The following table sets forth the fair value and the number of contracts of the firm’s derivative contracts by major product type on a gross basis as of December 2009. Gross fair values in the table below exclude the effects of both netting under enforceable netting agreements and netting of cash received or posted pursuant to credit support agreements, and therefore are not representative of the firm’s exposure:
(1)
As of November 2008, the gross fair value of derivative contracts accounted for as hedges consisted of $20.40 billion in assets and $128 million in liabilities.
(2)
Represents the netting of receivable balances with payable balances for the same counterparty pursuant to enforceable netting agreements.
(3)
Represents the netting of cash collateral received and posted on a counterparty basis pursuant to credit support agreements.
(4)
Presented after giving effect to $412.08 billion of derivative assets and $395.57 billion of derivative liabilities settled with clearing organizations.
(5)
For the year ended December 2009 and one month ended December 2008, the gain/(loss) recognized on interest rate derivative contracts accounted for as hedges was $(10.07) billion and $3.59 billion, respectively, and the related gain/(loss) recognized on the hedged borrowings and bank deposits was $9.95 billion and $(3.53) billion, respectively. These gains and losses are included in “Interest expense” in the consolidated statements of earnings. For the year ended December 2009, the gain/(loss) recognized on these derivative contracts included losses of $1.23 billion, which were excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. Such excluded gains/(losses) were not material for the one month ended December 2008.
(6)
For the year ended December 2009 and one month ended December 2008, the loss on currency derivative contracts accounted for as hedges was $495 million and $212 million, respectively. Such amounts are included in “Currency translation adjustment, net of tax” in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. The gain/(loss) related to ineffectiveness and the gain/(loss) reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income were not material for the year ended December 2009 or the one month ended December 2008.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The firm also has embedded derivatives that have been bifurcated from related borrowings. Such derivatives, which are classified in unsecured short-term and unsecured long-term borrowings in the firm’s consolidated statements of financial condition, had a net asset carrying value of $96 million and $774 million as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively. The net asset as of December 2009, which represented 297 contracts, included gross assets of $478 million (primarily comprised of equity and interest rate derivatives) and gross liabilities of $382 million (primarily comprised of equity and interest rate derivatives). See Notes 6 and 7 for further information regarding the firm’s unsecured borrowings.
As of December 2009 and November 2008, the firm has designated $3.38 billion and $3.36 billion, respectively, of foreign currency-denominated debt, included in unsecured long-term borrowings and unsecured short-term borrowings in the firm’s consolidated statements of financial condition, as hedges of net investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries. For the year ended December 2009 and one month ended December 2008, the gain/(loss) on these debt instruments was $106 million and $(186) million, respectively. Such amounts are included in “Currency translation adjustment, net of tax” in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. The gain/(loss) related to ineffectiveness and the gain/(loss) reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income was not material for the year ended December 2009 or one month ended December 2008.
The following table sets forth by major product type the firm’s gains/(losses) related to trading activities, including both derivative and nonderivative financial instruments, for the year ended December 2009 and one month ended December 2008. These gains/(losses) are not representative of the firm’s individual business unit results because many of the firm’s trading strategies utilize financial instruments across various product types. Accordingly, gains or losses in one product type frequently offset gains or losses in other product types. For example, most of the firm’s longer-term derivative contracts are sensitive to changes in interest rates and may be economically hedged with interest rate swaps. Similarly, a significant portion of the firm’s cash and derivatives trading inventory has exposure to foreign currencies and may be economically hedged with foreign currency contracts. The gains/(losses) set forth below are included in “Trading and principal investments” in the consolidated statements of earnings and exclude related interest income and interest expense.
(1)
Includes gains/(losses) on currency contracts used to economically hedge positions included in other product types in this table.
Certain of the firm’s derivative instruments have been transacted pursuant to bilateral agreements with certain counterparties that may require the firm to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on the firm’s long-term credit ratings. As of December 2009, the aggregate fair value of such derivative contracts that were in a net liability position was $20.85 billion, and the aggregate fair value of assets posted by the firm as collateral for these derivative contracts was $14.48 billion. As of December 2009, additional collateral or termination payments pursuant to bilateral agreements with certain counterparties of approximately $1.12 billion and $2.36 billion could have been called by counterparties in the event of a one-notch and two-notch reduction, respectively, in the firm’s long-term credit ratings.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The firm enters into a broad array of credit derivatives to facilitate client transactions, to take proprietary positions and as a means of risk management. The firm uses each of the credit derivatives described below for these purposes. These credit derivatives are entered into by various trading desks around the world, and are actively managed based on the underlying risks. These activities are frequently part of a broader trading strategy and are dynamically managed based on the net risk position. As individually negotiated contracts, credit derivatives can have numerous settlement and payment conventions. The more common types of triggers include bankruptcy of the reference credit entity, acceleration of indebtedness, failure to pay, restructuring, repudiation and dissolution of the entity.
•
Credit default swaps: Single-name credit default swaps protect the buyer against the loss of principal on one or more bonds, loans or mortgages (reference obligations) in the event of a default by the issuer (reference entity). The buyer of protection pays an initial or periodic premium to the seller and receives credit default protection for the period of the contract. If there is no credit default event, as defined by the specific derivative contract, then the seller of protection makes no payments to the buyer of protection. However, if a credit default event occurs, the seller of protection will be required to make a payment to the buyer of protection. Typical credit default events requiring payment include bankruptcy of the reference credit entity, failure to pay the principal or interest, and restructuring of the relevant obligations of the reference entity.
•
Credit indices, baskets and tranches: Credit derivatives may reference a basket of single-name credit default swaps or a broad-based index. Typically, in the event of a default of one of the underlying reference obligations, the protection seller will pay to the protection buyer a pro-rata portion of a transaction’s total notional amount relating to the underlying defaulted reference obligation. In tranched transactions, the credit risk of a basket or index is separated into various portions each having different levels of subordination. The most junior tranches cover initial defaults, and once losses exceed the notional amount of these tranches, the excess is covered by the next most senior tranche in the capital structure.
•
Total return swaps: A total return swap transfers the risks relating to economic performance of a reference obligation from the protection buyer to the protection seller. Typically, the protection buyer receives from the protection seller a floating rate of interest and protection against any reduction in fair value of the reference obligation, and in return the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference obligation, plus any increase in the fair value of the reference obligation.
•
Credit options: In a credit option, the option writer assumes the obligation to purchase or sell a reference obligation at a specified price or credit spread. The option purchaser buys the right to sell the reference obligation to, or purchase it from, the option writer. The payments on credit options depend either on a particular credit spread or the price of the reference obligation.
Substantially all of the firm’s purchased credit derivative transactions are with financial institutions and are subject to stringent collateral thresholds. The firm economically hedges its exposure to written credit derivatives primarily by entering into offsetting purchased credit derivatives with identical underlyings. In addition, upon the occurrence of a specified trigger event, the firm may take possession of the reference obligations underlying a particular written credit derivative, and consequently may, upon liquidation of the reference obligations, recover amounts on the underlying reference obligations in the event of default. As of December 2009, the firm’s written and purchased credit derivatives had total gross notional amounts of $2.54 trillion and $2.71 trillion, respectively, for total net purchased protection of $164.13 billion in notional value. As of November 2008, the firm’s written and purchased credit derivatives had total gross notional amounts of $3.78 trillion and $4.03 trillion, respectively, for total net purchased protection of $255.24 billion in notional value. The decrease in notional amounts from November 2008 to December 2009 primarily reflects compression efforts across the industry.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth certain information related to the firm’s credit derivatives. Fair values in the table below exclude the effects of both netting under enforceable netting agreements and netting of cash paid pursuant to credit support agreements, and therefore are not representative of the firm’s exposure.
(1)
Tenor is based on expected duration for mortgage-related credit derivatives and on remaining contractual maturity for other credit derivatives.
(2)
Offsetting purchased credit derivatives represent the notional amount of purchased credit derivatives to the extent they economically hedge written credit derivatives with identical underlyings.
(3)
Comprised of purchased protection in excess of the amount of written protection on identical underlyings and purchased protection on other underlyings on which the firm has not written protection.
(4)
Credit spread on the underlying, together with the tenor of the contract, are indicators of payment/performance risk. For example, the firm is least likely to pay or otherwise be required to perform where the credit spread on the underlying is “0-250” basis points and the tenor is “0-12 Months.” The likelihood of payment or performance is generally greater as the credit spread on the underlying and tenor increase.
(5)
These net liabilities differ from the carrying values related to credit derivatives in the firm’s consolidated statements of financial condition because they exclude the effects of both netting under enforceable netting agreements and netting of cash collateral paid pursuant to credit support agreements. Including the effects of netting receivable balances with payable balances for the same counterparty (across written and purchased credit derivatives) pursuant to enforceable netting agreements, the firm’s consolidated statements of financial condition as of December 2009 and November 2008 included a net asset related to credit derivatives of $39.74 billion and $71.78 billion, respectively, and a net liability related to credit derivatives of $9.75 billion and $33.48 billion, respectively. These net amounts exclude the netting of cash collateral paid pursuant to credit support agreements.
(6)
The decrease in this net liability from November 2008 to December 2009 primarily reflected tightening credit spreads.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Collateralized Transactions
The firm receives financial instruments as collateral, primarily in connection with resale agreements, securities borrowed, derivative transactions and customer margin loans. Such financial instruments may include obligations of the U.S. government, federal agencies, sovereigns and corporations, as well as equities and convertibles.
In many cases, the firm is permitted to deliver or repledge these financial instruments in connection with entering into repurchase agreements, securities lending agreements and other secured financings, collateralizing derivative transactions and meeting firm or customer settlement requirements. As of December 2009 and November 2008, the fair value of financial instruments received as collateral by the firm that it was permitted to deliver or repledge was $561.77 billion and $578.72 billion, respectively, of which the firm delivered or repledged $392.89 billion and $445.11 billion, respectively.
The firm also pledges assets that it owns to counterparties who may or may not have the right to deliver or repledge them. Trading assets pledged to counterparties that have the right to deliver or repledge are included in “Trading assets, at fair value” in the consolidated statements of financial condition and were $31.49 billion and $26.31 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively. Trading assets, pledged in connection with repurchase agreements, securities lending agreements and other secured financings to counterparties that did not have the right to sell or repledge are included in “Trading assets, at fair value” in the consolidated statements of financial condition and were $109.11 billion and $80.85 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively. Other assets (primarily real estate and cash) owned and pledged in connection with other secured financings to counterparties that did not have the right to sell or repledge were $7.93 billion and $9.24 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively.
In addition to repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements, the firm obtains secured funding through the use of other arrangements. Other secured financings include arrangements that are nonrecourse, that is, only the subsidiary that executed the arrangement or a subsidiary guaranteeing the arrangement is obligated to repay the financing. Other secured financings consist of liabilities related to the firm’s William Street credit extension program; consolidated VIEs; collateralized central bank financings and other transfers of financial assets that are accounted for as financings rather than sales (primarily pledged bank loans and mortgage whole loans); and other structured financing arrangements.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other secured financings by maturity are set forth in the table below:
(1)
As of December 2009 and November 2008, consists of U.S. dollar-denominated financings of $6.47 billion and $12.53 billion, respectively, with a weighted average interest rate of 3.44% and 2.98%, respectively, and non-U.S. dollar-denominated financings of $6.46 billion and $8.70 billion, respectively, with a weighted average interest rate of 1.57% and 0.95%, respectively, after giving effect to hedging activities. The weighted average interest rates as of December 2009 and November 2008 excluded financial instruments accounted for at fair value under the fair value option.
(2)
Includes other secured financings maturing within one year of the financial statement date and other secured financings that are redeemable within one year of the financial statement date at the option of the holder.
(3)
As of December 2009 and November 2008, consists of U.S. dollar-denominated financings of $7.28 billion and $9.55 billion, respectively, with a weighted average interest rate of 1.83% and 4.62%, respectively, and non-U.S. dollar-denominated financings of $3.92 billion and $7.91 billion, respectively, with a weighted average interest rate of 2.30% and 4.39%, respectively, after giving effect to hedging activities. The weighted average interest rates as of December 2009 and November 2008 excluded financial instruments accounted for at fair value under the fair value option.
(4)
Secured long-term financings that are repayable prior to maturity at the option of the firm are reflected at their contractual maturity dates. Secured long-term financings that are redeemable prior to maturity at the option of the holder are reflected at the dates such options become exercisable.
(5)
As of December 2009 and November 2008, $18.25 billion and $31.54 billion, respectively, of these financings were collateralized by trading assets and $5.88 billion and $7.14 billion, respectively, by other assets (primarily real estate and cash). Other secured financings include $10.63 billion and $13.74 billion of nonrecourse obligations as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively.
(6)
As of December 2009, other secured financings includes $9.51 billion related to transfers of financial assets accounted for as financings rather than sales. Such financings were collateralized by financial assets included in “Trading assets, at fair value” in the consolidated statement of financial condition of $9.78 billion as of December 2009.
Note 4.
Securitization Activities and Variable Interest Entities
Securitization Activities
The firm securitizes residential and commercial mortgages, corporate bonds and other types of financial assets. The firm acts as underwriter of the beneficial interests that are sold to investors. The firm derecognizes financial assets transferred in securitizations, provided it has relinquished control over such assets. Transferred assets are accounted for at fair value prior to securitization. Net revenues related to these underwriting activities are recognized in connection with the sales of the underlying beneficial interests to investors.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The firm may have continuing involvement with transferred assets, including: retaining interests in securitized financial assets, primarily in the form of senior or subordinated securities; retaining servicing rights; and purchasing senior or subordinated securities in connection with secondary market-making activities. Retained interests and other interests related to the firm’s continuing involvement are accounted for at fair value and are included in “Trading assets, at fair value” in the consolidated statements of financial condition. See Note 2 for additional information regarding fair value measurement.
During the year ended December 2009, the firm securitized $48.58 billion of financial assets in which the firm had continuing involvement, including $47.89 billion of residential mortgages, primarily in connection with government agency securitizations, and $691 million of other financial assets. During the year ended November 2008, the firm securitized $14.46 billion of financial assets, including $6.67 billion of residential mortgages, $773 million of commercial mortgages, and $7.01 billion of other financial assets, primarily in connection with CLOs. During the year ended November 2007, the firm securitized $81.40 billion of financial assets, including $24.95 billion of residential mortgages, $19.50 billion of commercial mortgages, and $36.95 billion of other financial assets, primarily in connection with CDOs and CLOs. During the one month ended December 2008, the firm securitized $604 million of financial assets, including $557 million of residential mortgages and $47 million of other financial assets. Cash flows received on retained interests were $507 million, $505 million, $705 million and $26 million for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007 and one month ended December 2008, respectively.
The following table sets forth certain information related to the firm’s continuing involvement in securitization entities to which the firm sold assets, as well as the total outstanding principal amount of transferred assets in which the firm has continuing involvement, as of December 2009. The outstanding principal amount set forth in the table below is presented for the purpose of providing information about the size of the securitization entities in which the firm has continuing involvement, and is not representative of the firm’s risk of loss. For retained or purchased interests, the firm’s risk of loss is limited to the fair value of these interests.
(1)
As of December 2009, fair value of other continuing involvement excludes $1.04 billion of purchased interests in securitization entities where the firm’s involvement was related to secondary market-making activities. Continuing involvement also excludes derivative contracts that are used by securitization entities to manage credit, interest rate or foreign exchange risk. See Note 3 for information on the firm’s derivative contracts.
(2)
Comprised of senior and subordinated interests purchased in connection with secondary market-making activities in VIEs and QSPEs in which the firm also holds retained interests. In addition to these interests, the firm had other continuing involvement in the form of derivative transactions and guarantees with certain nonconsolidated VIEs for which the carrying value was a net liability of $87 million as of December 2009. The notional amounts of these transactions are included in maximum exposure to loss in the nonconsolidated VIE table below.
(3)
Primarily consists of outstanding principal and retained interests related to government agency QSPEs.
(4)
Primarily consists of CDOs backed by corporate and mortgage obligations and CLOs. Outstanding principal amount and fair value of retained interests include $16.22 billion and $72 million, respectively, as of December 2009 related to VIEs which are also included in the nonconsolidated VIE table below.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth the weighted average key economic assumptions used in measuring the fair value of the firm’s retained interests and the sensitivity of this fair value to immediate adverse changes of 10% and 20% in those assumptions:
(1)
Includes $4.03 billion and $1.53 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively, held in QSPEs.
(2)
Due to the nature and current fair value of certain of these retained interests, the weighted average assumptions for constant prepayment and discount rates and the related sensitivity to adverse changes are not meaningful as of December 2009. The firm’s maximum exposure to adverse changes in the value of these interests is the firm’s carrying value of $93 million.
(3)
Constant prepayment rate is included only for positions for which constant prepayment rate is a key assumption in the determination of fair value.
(4)
The majority of the firm’s mortgage-backed retained interests are U.S. government agency-issued collateralized mortgage obligations, for which there is no anticipated credit loss. For the remainder of the firm’s retained interests, the expected credit loss assumptions are reflected within the discount rate.
(5)
Includes $192 million of retained interests related to transfers of securitized assets that were accounted for as secured financings rather than sales.
The preceding table does not give effect to the offsetting benefit of other financial instruments that are held to mitigate risks inherent in these retained interests. Changes in fair value based on an adverse variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the change in fair value is not usually linear. In addition, the impact of a change in a particular assumption is calculated independently of changes in any other assumption. In practice, simultaneous changes in assumptions might magnify or counteract the sensitivities disclosed above.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of December 2009 and November 2008, the firm held mortgage servicing rights with a fair value of $88 million and $147 million, respectively. These servicing assets represent the firm’s right to receive a future stream of cash flows, such as servicing fees, in excess of the firm’s obligation to service residential mortgages. The fair value of mortgage servicing rights will fluctuate in response to changes in certain economic variables, such as discount rates and loan prepayment rates. The firm estimates the fair value of mortgage servicing rights by using valuation models that incorporate these variables in quantifying anticipated cash flows related to servicing activities. Mortgage servicing rights are included in “Trading assets, at fair value” in the consolidated statements of financial condition and are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The following table sets forth changes in the firm’s mortgage servicing rights, as well as servicing fees earned:
(1)
As of December 2009 and November 2008, the fair value was estimated using a weighted average discount rate of approximately 16% and 16%, respectively, and a weighted average prepayment rate of approximately 20% and 27%, respectively.
(2)
Contractually specified servicing fees for the one month ended December 2008 were $25 million.
(3)
Primarily related to the acquisition of Litton Loan Servicing LP.
Variable Interest Entities
The firm, in the ordinary course of business, retains interests in VIEs in connection with its securitization activities. The firm also purchases and sells variable interests in VIEs, which primarily issue mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities, CDOs and CLOs, in connection with its market-making activities and makes investments in and loans to VIEs that hold performing and nonperforming debt, equity, real estate, power-related and other assets. In addition, the firm utilizes VIEs to provide investors with principal-protected notes, credit-linked notes and asset-repackaged notes designed to meet their objectives. VIEs generally purchase assets by issuing debt and equity instruments.
The firm’s significant variable interests in VIEs include senior and subordinated debt interests in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securitization vehicles, CDOs and CLOs; loan commitments; limited and general partnership interests; preferred and common stock; interest rate, foreign currency, equity, commodity and credit derivatives; and guarantees.
The firm’s exposure to the obligations of VIEs is generally limited to its interests in these entities. In the tables set forth below, the maximum exposure to loss for purchased and retained interests and loans and investments is the carrying value of these interests. In certain instances, the firm provides guarantees, including derivative guarantees, to VIEs or holders of variable interests in VIEs. For these contracts, maximum exposure to loss set forth in the tables below is the notional amount of such guarantees, which does not represent anticipated losses and also has not been reduced by unrealized
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
losses already recorded by the firm in connection with these guarantees. As a result, the maximum exposure to loss exceeds the firm’s liabilities related to VIEs.
The following tables set forth total assets in firm-sponsored nonconsolidated VIEs in which the firm holds variable interests and other nonconsolidated VIEs in which the firm holds significant variable interests, and the firm’s maximum exposure to loss excluding the benefit of offsetting financial instruments that are held to mitigate the risks associated with these variable interests. For 2009, in accordance with amended principles requiring enhanced disclosures, the following table also sets forth the total assets and total liabilities included in the consolidated statements of financial condition related to the firm’s interests in these nonconsolidated VIEs. The firm has aggregated nonconsolidated VIEs based on principal business activity, as reflected in the first column. The nature of the firm’s variable interests can take different forms, as described in the columns under maximum exposure to loss.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(1)
Such amounts do not represent the anticipated losses in connection with these transactions because they exclude the effect of offsetting financial instruments that are held to mitigate these risks.
(2)
These VIEs are generally financed through the issuance of debt instruments collateralized by assets held by the VIE. Substantially all assets and liabilities held by the firm related to these VIEs are included in “Trading assets, at fair value” and “Trading liabilities, at fair value,” respectively, in the consolidated statement of financial condition.
(3)
The firm obtains interests in these VIEs in connection with making investments in real estate, distressed loans and other types of debt, mezzanine instruments and equities. These VIEs are generally financed through the issuance of debt and equity instruments which are either collateralized by or indexed to assets held by the VIE. Substantially all assets and liabilities held by the firm related to these VIEs are included in “Trading assets, at fair value” and “Other assets,” and “Other liabilities and accrued expenses,” respectively, in the consolidated statement of financial condition.
(4)
Assets and liabilities held by the firm related to these VIEs are included in “Other assets” and “Other liabilities and accrued expenses,” respectively, in the consolidated statement of financial condition.
(5)
Consists of out-of-the-money written put options that provide principal protection to clients invested in various fund products, with risk to the firm mitigated through portfolio rebalancing. Assets related to these VIEs are included in “Trading assets, at fair value” and liabilities related to these VIEs are included in “Other secured financings,” “Unsecured short-term borrowings, including the current portion of unsecured long-term borrowings” or “Unsecured long-term borrowings” in the consolidated statement of financial condition. Assets in VIE, carrying value of liabilities and maximum exposure to loss exclude $3.97 billion as of December 2009, associated with guarantees related to the firm’s performance under borrowings from the VIE, which are recorded as liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial condition. Substantially all of the liabilities included in the table above relate to additional borrowings from the VIE associated with principal protected notes guaranteed by the firm.
(6)
The aggregate amounts include $4.66 billion as of December 2009, related to guarantees and derivative transactions with VIEs to which the firm transferred assets.
(7)
Primarily consists of written protection on investment-grade, short-term collateral held by VIEs that have issued CDOs.
(8)
Primarily consists of total return swaps on CDOs and CLOs. The firm has generally transferred the risks related to the underlying securities through derivatives with non-VIEs.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth the firm’s total assets excluding the benefit of offsetting financial instruments that are held to mitigate the risks associated with its variable interests in consolidated VIEs. The following table excludes VIEs in which the firm holds a majority voting interest unless the activities of the VIE are primarily related to securitization, asset-backed financings or single-lessee leasing arrangements. For 2009, in accordance with amended principles requiring enhanced disclosures, the following table also sets forth the total liabilities included in the consolidated statement of financial condition related to the firm’s consolidated VIEs. The firm has aggregated consolidated VIEs based on principal business activity, as reflected in the first column.
(1)
Consolidated VIE assets and liabilities are presented after intercompany eliminations and include assets financed on a nonrecourse basis. Substantially all VIE assets are included in “Trading assets, at fair value” and “Other assets” in the consolidated statements of financial condition.
(2)
These VIE liabilities are generally collateralized by the related VIE assets and included in “Other secured financings” and “Other liabilities and accrued expenses” in the consolidated statement of financial condition. These VIE liabilities generally do not provide for recourse to the general credit of the firm.
(3)
These VIE liabilities, which are partially collateralized by the related VIE assets, are included in “Other secured financings” in the consolidated statement of financial condition.
(4)
These VIE liabilities are primarily included in “Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, at fair value” and “Other secured financings” in the consolidated statement of financial condition and generally do not provide for recourse to the general credit of the firm.
(5)
These VIE liabilities are primarily included in “Trading liabilities, at fair value” in the consolidated statement of financial condition.
(6)
These VIE liabilities are included in “Unsecured short-term borrowings, including the current portion of unsecured long-term borrowings” in the consolidated statement of financial condition.
The firm did not have off-balance-sheet commitments to purchase or finance any CDOs held by structured investment vehicles as of December 2009 or November 2008.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 5.
Deposits
The following table sets forth deposits as of December 2009 and November 2008:
(1)
Substantially all U.S. deposits were interest-bearing and were held at GS Bank USA.
(2)
Substantially all non-U.S. deposits were interest-bearing and were held at Goldman Sachs Bank (Europe) PLC (GS Bank Europe).
Included in the above table are time deposits of $9.30 billion and $8.49 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively. The following table sets forth the maturities of time deposits as of December 2009:
(1)
Includes $242 million greater than $100,000, of which $111 million matures within three months, $58 million matures within three to six months, $32 million matures within six to twelve months, and $41 million matures after twelve months.
(2)
Substantially all were greater than $100,000.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 6.
Short-Term Borrowings
As of December 2009 and November 2008, short-term borrowings were $50.45 billion and $73.89 billion, respectively, comprised of $12.93 billion and $21.23 billion, respectively, included in “Other secured financings” in the consolidated statements of financial condition and $37.52 billion and $52.66 billion, respectively, of unsecured short-term borrowings. See Note 3 for information on other secured financings.
Unsecured short-term borrowings include the portion of unsecured long-term borrowings maturing within one year of the financial statement date and unsecured long-term borrowings that are redeemable within one year of the financial statement date at the option of the holder. The firm accounts for promissory notes, commercial paper and certain hybrid financial instruments at fair value under the fair value option. Short-term borrowings that are not recorded at fair value are recorded based on the amount of cash received plus accrued interest, and such amounts approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of the obligations.
Unsecured short-term borrowings are set forth below:
(1)
Includes $1.73 billion as of December 2009, guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) under the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP).
(2)
Includes $17.05 billion and $25.12 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively, issued by Group Inc.
(3)
Includes $0 and $3.42 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively, guaranteed by the FDIC under the TLGP.
(4)
Includes $0 and $751 million as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively, guaranteed by the FDIC under the TLGP.
(5)
The weighted average interest rates for these borrowings, after giving effect to hedging activities, were 1.31% and 3.37% as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively, and excluded financial instruments accounted for at fair value under the fair value option.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 7.
Long-Term Borrowings
As of December 2009 and November 2008, long-term borrowings were $196.29 billion and $185.68 billion, respectively, comprised of $11.20 billion and $17.46 billion, respectively, included in “Other secured financings” in the consolidated statements of financial condition and $185.09 billion and $168.22 billion, respectively, of unsecured long-term borrowings. See Note 3 for information regarding other secured financings.
The firm’s unsecured long-term borrowings extend through 2043 and consist principally of senior borrowings.
Unsecured long-term borrowings are set forth below:
(1)
As of December 2009 and November 2008, $79.12 billion and $70.08 billion, respectively, of the firm’s fixed rate debt obligations were denominated in U.S. dollars and interest rates ranged from 1.63% to 10.04% and from 3.87% to 10.04%, respectively. As of December 2009 and November 2008, $38.29 billion and $33.75 billion, respectively, of the firm’s fixed rate debt obligations were denominated in non-U.S. dollars and interest rates ranged from 0.80% to 7.45% and from 0.67% to 8.88%, respectively.
(2)
As of December 2009 and November 2008, $32.26 billion and $32.41 billion, respectively, of the firm’s floating rate debt obligations were denominated in U.S. dollars. As of December 2009 and November 2008, $35.41 billion and $31.99 billion, respectively, of the firm’s floating rate debt obligations were denominated in non-U.S. dollars. Floating interest rates generally are based on LIBOR or the federal funds target rate. Equity-linked and indexed instruments are included in floating rate obligations.
(3)
Includes $19.03 billion as of December 2009, guaranteed by the FDIC under the TLGP.
Unsecured long-term borrowings by maturity date are set forth below:
(1)
Unsecured long-term borrowings maturing within one year of the financial statement date and unsecured long-term borrowings that are redeemable within one year of the financial statement date at the option of the holder are included as unsecured short-term borrowings in the consolidated statements of financial condition.
(2)
Unsecured long-term borrowings that are repayable prior to maturity at the option of the firm are reflected at their contractual maturity dates. Unsecured long-term borrowings that are redeemable prior to maturity at the option of the holder are reflected at the dates such options become exercisable.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The firm enters into derivative contracts to effectively convert a substantial portion of its unsecured long-term borrowings which are not accounted for at fair value into floating rate obligations. Accordingly, excluding the cumulative impact of changes in the firm’s credit spreads, the carrying value of unsecured long-term borrowings approximated fair value as of December 2009 and November 2008. For unsecured long-term borrowings for which the firm did not elect the fair value option, the cumulative impact due to the widening of the firm’s own credit spreads would be a reduction in the carrying value of total unsecured long-term borrowings of less than 1% and approximately 9% as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively.
The effective weighted average interest rates for unsecured long-term borrowings are set forth below:
(1)
Includes fixed rate obligations that have been converted into floating rate obligations through derivative contracts.
(2)
The weighted average interest rates as of December 2009 and November 2008 excluded financial instruments accounted for at fair value under the fair value option.
Subordinated Borrowings
As of December 2009 and November 2008, unsecured long-term borrowings were comprised of subordinated borrowings with outstanding principal amounts of $19.16 billion and $19.26 billion, respectively, as set forth below, of which $18.87 billion and $18.79 billion, respectively, has been issued by Group Inc.
Junior Subordinated Debt Issued to Trusts in Connection with Fixed-to-Floating and Floating Rate Normal Automatic Preferred Enhanced Capital Securities. In 2007, Group Inc. issued a total of $2.25 billion of remarketable junior subordinated debt to Goldman Sachs Capital II and Goldman Sachs Capital III (APEX Trusts), Delaware statutory trusts that, in turn, issued $2.25 billion of guaranteed perpetual Normal Automatic Preferred Enhanced Capital Securities (APEX) to third parties and a de minimis amount of common securities to Group Inc. Group Inc. also entered into contracts with the APEX Trusts to sell $2.25 billion of perpetual non-cumulative preferred stock to be issued by Group Inc. (the stock purchase contracts). The APEX Trusts are wholly owned finance subsidiaries of the firm for regulatory and legal purposes but are not consolidated for accounting purposes.
The firm pays interest semi-annually on $1.75 billion of junior subordinated debt issued to Goldman Sachs Capital II at a fixed annual rate of 5.59% and the debt matures on June 1, 2043. The firm pays interest quarterly on $500 million of junior subordinated debt issued to Goldman Sachs Capital III at a rate per annum equal to three-month LIBOR plus 0.57% and the debt matures on September 1, 2043. In addition, the firm makes contract payments at a rate of 0.20% per annum on the stock purchase contracts held by the APEX Trusts. The firm has the right to defer payments on
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
the junior subordinated debt and the stock purchase contracts, subject to limitations, and therefore cause payment on the APEX to be deferred. During any such extension period, the firm will not be permitted to, among other things, pay dividends on or make certain repurchases of its common or preferred stock. The junior subordinated debt is junior in right of payment to all of Group Inc.’s senior indebtedness and all of Group Inc.’s other subordinated borrowings.
In connection with the APEX issuance, the firm covenanted in favor of certain of its debtholders, who are initially the holders of Group Inc.’s 6.345% Junior Subordinated Debentures due February 15, 2034, that, subject to certain exceptions, the firm would not redeem or purchase (i) Group Inc.’s junior subordinated debt issued to the APEX Trusts prior to the applicable stock purchase date or (ii) APEX or shares of Group Inc.’s Series E or Series F Preferred Stock prior to the date that is ten years after the applicable stock purchase date, unless the applicable redemption or purchase price does not exceed a maximum amount determined by reference to the aggregate amount of net cash proceeds that the firm has received from the sale of qualifying equity securities during the 180-day period preceding the redemption or purchase.
The firm accounted for the stock purchase contracts as equity instruments and, accordingly, recorded the cost of the stock purchase contracts as a reduction to additional paid-in capital. See Note 9 for information on the preferred stock that Group Inc. will issue in connection with the stock purchase contracts.
Junior Subordinated Debt Issued to a Trust in Connection with Trust Preferred Securities. Group Inc. issued $2.84 billion of junior subordinated debentures in 2004 to Goldman Sachs Capital I (Trust), a Delaware statutory trust that, in turn, issued $2.75 billion of guaranteed preferred beneficial interests to third parties and $85 million of common beneficial interests to Group Inc. and invested the proceeds from the sale in junior subordinated debentures issued by Group Inc. The Trust is a wholly owned finance subsidiary of the firm for regulatory and legal purposes but is not consolidated for accounting purposes.
The firm pays interest semi-annually on these debentures at an annual rate of 6.345% and the debentures mature on February 15, 2034. The coupon rate and the payment dates applicable to the beneficial interests are the same as the interest rate and payment dates applicable to the debentures. The firm has the right, from time to time, to defer payment of interest on the debentures, and, therefore, cause payment on the Trust’s preferred beneficial interests to be deferred, in each case up to ten consecutive semi-annual periods. During any such extension period, the firm will not be permitted to, among other things, pay dividends on or make certain repurchases of its common stock. The Trust is not permitted to pay any distributions on the common beneficial interests held by Group Inc. unless all dividends payable on the preferred beneficial interests have been paid in full. These debentures are junior in right of payment to all of Group Inc.’s senior indebtedness and all of Group Inc.’s subordinated borrowings, other than the junior subordinated debt issued in connection with the APEX.
Subordinated Debt. As of December 2009, the firm had $14.07 billion of other subordinated debt outstanding, of which $13.78 billion has been issued by Group Inc., with maturities ranging from 2012 to 2038. The effective weighted average interest rate on this debt was 1.51%, after giving effect to derivative contracts used to convert fixed rate obligations into floating rate obligations. As of November 2008, the firm had $14.17 billion of other subordinated debt outstanding, of which $13.70 billion has been issued by Group Inc., with maturities ranging from fiscal 2009 to 2038. The effective weighted average interest rate on this debt was 1.99%, after giving effect to derivative contracts used to convert fixed rate obligations into floating rate obligations. This debt is junior in right of payment to all of the firm’s senior indebtedness.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 8.
Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
Commitments
The following table summarizes the firm’s commitments as of December 2009 and November 2008:
(1)
Commitments to extend credit are presented net of amounts syndicated to third parties.
(2)
Included within non-investment-grade commitments as of December 2009 and November 2008 were $1.20 billion and $2.07 billion, respectively, related to leveraged lending capital market transactions; $40 million and $164 million, respectively, related to commercial real estate transactions; and $6.91 billion and $7.09 billion, respectively, arising from other unfunded credit facilities. Including funded loans, the total notional amount of the firm’s leveraged lending capital market transactions was $4.45 billion and $7.97 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively.
(3)
Consists of commitments under letters of credit issued by various banks which the firm provides to counterparties in lieu of securities or cash to satisfy various collateral and margin deposit requirements.
(4)
Consists of the firm’s commitments to invest in private equity, real estate and other assets directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages in connection with its merchant banking and other investing activities, consisting of $2.46 billion and $3.15 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively, related to real estate private investments and $10.78 billion and $11.12 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively, related to corporate and other private investments. Such commitments include $11.38 billion and $12.25 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively, of commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm, which will be funded at market value on the date of investment.
(5)
Includes commitments of $104 million and $388 million as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively, related to the firm’s new headquarters in New York City.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Commitments to Extend Credit. The firm’s commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to counterparties that have fixed termination dates and are contingent on the satisfaction of all conditions to borrowing set forth in the contract. Since these commitments may expire unused or be reduced or cancelled at the counterparty’s request, the total commitment amount does not necessarily reflect the actual future cash flow requirements. The firm accounts for these commitments at fair value. To the extent that the firm recognizes losses on these commitments, such losses are recorded within the firm’s Trading and Principal Investments segment net of any related underwriting fees.
•
Commercial lending commitments. The firm’s commercial lending commitments are generally extended in connection with contingent acquisition financing and other types of corporate lending as well as commercial real estate financing. The total commitment amount does not necessarily reflect the actual future cash flow requirements, as the firm may syndicate all or substantial portions of these commitments in the future, the commitments may expire unused, or the commitments may be cancelled or reduced at the request of the counterparty. In addition, commitments that are extended for contingent acquisition financing are often intended to be short-term in nature, as borrowers often seek to replace them with other funding sources.
•
William Street credit extension program. Substantially all of the commitments provided under the William Street credit extension program are to investment-grade corporate borrowers. Commitments under the program are principally extended by William Street Commitment Corporation (Commitment Corp.), a consolidated wholly owned subsidiary of GS Bank USA, GS Bank USA and other subsidiaries of GS Bank USA. The commitments extended by Commitment Corp. are supported, in part, by funding raised by William Street Funding Corporation (Funding Corp.), another consolidated wholly owned subsidiary of GS Bank USA. The assets and liabilities of Commitment Corp. and Funding Corp. are legally separated from other assets and liabilities of the firm. The assets of Commitment Corp. and of Funding Corp. will not be available to their respective shareholders until the claims of their respective creditors have been paid. In addition, no affiliate of either Commitment Corp. or Funding Corp., except in limited cases as expressly agreed in writing, is responsible for any obligation of either entity. With respect to most of the William Street commitments, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) provides the firm with credit loss protection that is generally limited to 95% of the first loss the firm realizes on approved loan commitments, up to a maximum of approximately $950 million. In addition, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, upon the firm’s request, SMFG will provide protection for 70% of additional losses on such commitments, up to a maximum of $1.13 billion, of which $375 million of protection had been provided as of both December 2009 and November 2008. The firm also uses other financial instruments to mitigate credit risks related to certain William Street commitments not covered by SMFG.
•
Warehouse financing. The firm provides financing for the warehousing of financial assets. These arrangements are secured by the warehoused assets, primarily consisting of commercial mortgages as of December 2009 and November 2008.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Leases. The firm has contractual obligations under long-term noncancelable lease agreements, principally for office space, expiring on various dates through 2069. Certain agreements are subject to periodic escalation provisions for increases in real estate taxes and other charges. Future minimum rental payments, net of minimum sublease rentals are set forth below:
Rent charged to operating expense is set forth below:
Contingencies
The firm is involved in a number of judicial, regulatory and arbitration proceedings concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of its businesses. Management believes, based on currently available information, that the results of such proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the firm’s financial condition, but may be material to the firm’s operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period. Given the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of the firm’s litigation and regulatory matters, particularly in cases or proceedings in which substantial or indeterminate damages or fines are sought, the firm cannot estimate losses or ranges of losses for cases or proceedings where there is only a reasonable possibility that a loss may be incurred.
In connection with its insurance business, the firm is contingently liable to provide guaranteed minimum death and income benefits to certain contract holders and has established a reserve related to $6.35 billion and $6.13 billion of contract holder account balances as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively, for such benefits. The weighted average attained age of these contract holders was 68 years as of both December 2009 and November 2008. The net amount at risk, representing guaranteed minimum death and income benefits in excess of contract holder account balances, was $1.96 billion and $2.96 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively. See Note 12 for more information on the firm’s insurance liabilities.
Guarantees
The firm enters into various derivative contracts that meet the definition of a guarantee under ASC 460. Disclosures about derivative contracts are not required if such contracts may be cash settled and the firm has no basis to conclude it is probable that the counterparties held, at inception, the underlying instruments related to the derivative contracts. The firm has concluded that these conditions have been met for certain large, internationally active commercial and investment bank counterparties and certain other counterparties. Accordingly, the firm has not included such contracts in the tables below.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The firm, in its capacity as an agency lender, indemnifies most of its securities lending customers against losses incurred in the event that borrowers do not return securities and the collateral held is insufficient to cover the market value of the securities borrowed.
In the ordinary course of business, the firm provides other financial guarantees of the obligations of third parties (e.g., performance bonds, standby letters of credit and other guarantees to enable clients to complete transactions and merchant banking fund-related guarantees). These guarantees represent obligations to make payments to beneficiaries if the guaranteed party fails to fulfill its obligation under a contractual arrangement with that beneficiary.
The following table sets forth certain information about the firm’s derivative contracts that meet the definition of a guarantee and certain other guarantees as of December 2009. Derivative contracts set forth below include written equity and commodity put options, written currency contracts and interest rate caps, floors and swaptions. See Note 3 for information regarding credit derivative contracts that meet the definition of a guarantee, which are not included below.
(1)
Such amounts do not represent the anticipated losses in connection with these contracts.
(2)
Because derivative contracts are accounted for at fair value, carrying value is considered the best indication of payment/performance risk for individual contracts. However, the carrying value excludes the effect of a legal right of setoff that may exist under an enforceable netting agreement and the effect of netting of cash paid pursuant to credit support agreements. These derivative contracts are risk managed together with derivative contracts that do not meet the definition of a guarantee under ASC 460 and, therefore, these amounts do not reflect the firm’s overall risk related to its derivative activities. As of November 2008, the carrying value of the net liability related to derivative guarantees was $17.46 billion.
(3)
Collateral held by the lenders in connection with securities lending indemnifications was $28.07 billion and $19.95 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively. Because the contractual nature of these arrangements requires the firm to obtain collateral with a market value that exceeds the value of the securities on loan from the borrower, there is minimal performance risk associated with these guarantees.
(4)
As of November 2008, the carrying value of the net liability related to other financial guarantees was $235 million.
The firm has established trusts, including Goldman Sachs Capital I, II and III, and other entities for the limited purpose of issuing securities to third parties, lending the proceeds to the firm and entering into contractual arrangements with the firm and third parties related to this purpose. See Note 7 for information regarding the transactions involving Goldman Sachs Capital I, II and III. The firm effectively provides for the full and unconditional guarantee of the securities issued by these entities, which are not consolidated for accounting purposes. Timely payment by the firm of amounts due to these entities under the borrowing, preferred stock and related contractual arrangements will be sufficient to cover payments due on the securities issued by these entities. Management believes that it is unlikely that any circumstances will occur, such as nonperformance on the part of paying agents or other service providers, that would make it necessary for the firm to make payments related to these entities other than those required under the terms of the borrowing, preferred stock and related contractual arrangements and in connection with certain expenses incurred by these entities. Group Inc. also fully and unconditionally guarantees the securities issued by GS Finance Corp., a wholly owned finance subsidiary of the firm, which is consolidated for accounting purposes.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In the ordinary course of business, the firm indemnifies and guarantees certain service providers, such as clearing and custody agents, trustees and administrators, against specified potential losses in connection with their acting as an agent of, or providing services to, the firm or its affiliates. The firm also indemnifies some clients against potential losses incurred in the event specified third-party service providers, including sub-custodians and third-party brokers, improperly execute transactions. In addition, the firm is a member of payment, clearing and settlement networks as well as securities exchanges around the world that may require the firm to meet the obligations of such networks and exchanges in the event of member defaults. In connection with its prime brokerage and clearing businesses, the firm agrees to clear and settle on behalf of its clients the transactions entered into by them with other brokerage firms. The firm’s obligations in respect of such transactions are secured by the assets in the client’s account as well as any proceeds received from the transactions cleared and settled by the firm on behalf of the client. In connection with joint venture investments, the firm may issue loan guarantees under which it may be liable in the event of fraud, misappropriation, environmental liabilities and certain other matters involving the borrower. The firm is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under these guarantees and indemnifications. However, management believes that it is unlikely the firm will have to make any material payments under these arrangements, and no liabilities related to these guarantees and indemnifications have been recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition as of December 2009 and November 2008.
The firm provides representations and warranties to counterparties in connection with a variety of commercial transactions and occasionally indemnifies them against potential losses caused by the breach of those representations and warranties. The firm may also provide indemnifications protecting against changes in or adverse application of certain U.S. tax laws in connection with ordinary-course transactions such as securities issuances, borrowings or derivatives. In addition, the firm may provide indemnifications to some counterparties to protect them in the event additional taxes are owed or payments are withheld, due either to a change in or an adverse application of certain non-U.S. tax laws. These indemnifications generally are standard contractual terms and are entered into in the ordinary course of business. Generally, there are no stated or notional amounts included in these indemnifications, and the contingencies triggering the obligation to indemnify are not expected to occur. The firm is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under these guarantees and indemnifications. However, management believes that it is unlikely the firm will have to make any material payments under these arrangements, and no liabilities related to these arrangements have been recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition as of December 2009 and November 2008.
Group Inc. has guaranteed the payment obligations of Goldman, Sachs & Co. (GS&Co.), GS Bank USA and GS Bank Europe, subject to certain exceptions. In November 2008, the firm contributed subsidiaries into GS Bank USA, and Group Inc. agreed to guarantee certain losses, including credit-related losses, relating to assets held by the contributed entities. In connection with this guarantee, Group Inc. also agreed to pledge to GS Bank USA certain collateral, including interests in subsidiaries and other illiquid assets. In addition, Group Inc. guarantees many of the obligations of its other consolidated subsidiaries on a transaction-by-transaction basis, as negotiated with counterparties. Group Inc. is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under its subsidiary guarantees; however, because these guaranteed obligations are also obligations of consolidated subsidiaries included in the table above, Group Inc.’s liabilities as guarantor are not separately disclosed.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 9.
Shareholders’ Equity
Common and Preferred Equity
During 2009, common shares outstanding increased by 72.6 million shares, which included 46.7 million common shares issued through a public offering at $123.00 per share for total proceeds of $5.75 billion during the second quarter of 2009.
In June 2009, Group Inc. repurchased from the U.S. Department of the Treasury (U.S. Treasury) the 10.0 million shares of the Company’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series H (Series H Preferred Stock), that were issued to the U.S. Treasury pursuant to the U.S. Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program. The repurchase resulted in a one-time preferred dividend of $426 million, which is included in the consolidated statement of earnings for the year ended December 2009. This one-time preferred dividend represented the difference between the carrying value and the redemption value of the Series H Preferred Stock. In connection with the issuance of the Series H Preferred Stock in October 2008, the firm issued a 10-year warrant to the U.S. Treasury to purchase up to 12.2 million shares of common stock at an exercise price of $122.90 per share. The firm repurchased this warrant in full in July 2009 for $1.1 billion. This amount was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital. The firm’s cumulative payments to the U.S. Treasury related to the U.S. Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program totaled $11.42 billion, including the return of the U.S. Treasury’s $10.0 billion investment (inclusive of the $426 million described above), $318 million in preferred dividends and $1.1 billion related to the warrant repurchase.
Dividends declared per common share were $1.05 in 2009, $1.40 in 2008 and $1.40 in 2007. On January 19, 2010, the Board declared a dividend of $0.35 per common share to be paid on March 30, 2010 to common shareholders of record on March 2, 2010. On December 15, 2008, the Board declared a dividend of $0.4666666 per common share to be paid on March 26, 2009 to common shareholders of record on February 24, 2009. The dividend of $0.4666666 per common share is reflective of a four-month period (December 2008 through March 2009), due to the change in the firm’s fiscal year-end.
During 2009 and 2008, the firm repurchased 19,578 and 10.5 million shares of its common stock at an average cost per share of $80.83 and $193.18, for a total cost of $2 million and $2.04 billion, respectively. Shares repurchased during 2009 primarily related to repurchases made by GS&Co. to facilitate customer transactions in the ordinary course of business. In addition, to satisfy minimum statutory employee tax withholding requirements related to the delivery of common stock underlying RSUs, the firm cancelled 11.2 million and 6.7 million of RSUs with a total value of $863 million and $1.31 billion in 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The firm’s share repurchase program is intended to help maintain the appropriate level of common equity and to substantially offset increases in share count over time resulting from employee share-based compensation. The repurchase program is effected primarily through regular open-market purchases, the amounts and timing of which are determined primarily by the firm’s current and projected capital positions (i.e., comparisons of the firm’s desired level of capital to its actual level of capital) but which may also be influenced by general market conditions and the prevailing price and trading volumes of the firm’s common stock. Any repurchase of the firm’s common stock requires approval by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve Board).
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of December 2009, the firm had 174,000 shares of perpetual preferred stock issued and outstanding as set forth in the following table:
Each share of non-cumulative preferred stock issued and outstanding has a par value of $0.01, has a liquidation preference of $25,000, is represented by 1,000 depositary shares and is redeemable at the firm’s option, subject to the approval of the Federal Reserve Board, at a redemption price equal to $25,000 plus declared and unpaid dividends.
Each share of 10% Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series G (Series G Preferred Stock) issued and outstanding has a par value of $0.01, has a liquidation preference of $100,000 and is redeemable at the firm’s option, subject to the approval of the Federal Reserve Board, at a redemption price equal to $110,000 plus accrued and unpaid dividends. In connection with the issuance of the Series G Preferred Stock, the firm issued a five-year warrant to purchase up to 43.5 million shares of common stock at an exercise price of $115.00 per share. The warrant is exercisable at any time until October 1, 2013 and the number of shares of common stock underlying the warrant and the exercise price are subject to adjustment for certain dilutive events.
All series of preferred stock are pari passu and have a preference over the firm’s common stock upon liquidation. Dividends on each series of preferred stock, if declared, are payable quarterly in arrears. The firm’s ability to declare or pay dividends on, or purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, its common stock is subject to certain restrictions in the event that the firm fails to pay or set aside full dividends on the preferred stock for the latest completed dividend period.
In 2007, the Board authorized 17,500.1 shares of perpetual Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series E (Series E Preferred Stock), and 5,000.1 shares of perpetual Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series F (Series F Preferred Stock), in connection with the APEX issuance. See Note 7 for further information on the APEX issuance. Under the stock purchase contracts, Group Inc. will issue on the relevant stock purchase dates (on or before June 1, 2013 and September 1, 2013 for Series E and Series F Preferred Stock, respectively) one share of Series E and Series F Preferred Stock to Goldman Sachs Capital II and III, respectively, for each $100,000 principal amount of subordinated debt held by these trusts. When issued, each share of Series E and Series F Preferred Stock will have a par value of $0.01 and a liquidation preference of $100,000 per share. Dividends on Series E Preferred Stock, if declared, will be payable semi-annually at a fixed annual rate of 5.79% if the stock is issued prior to June 1, 2012 and quarterly thereafter, at a rate per annum equal to the greater of (i) three-month LIBOR plus 0.77% and (ii) 4.00%. Dividends on Series F Preferred Stock, if declared, will be payable quarterly at a rate per annum equal to three-month LIBOR plus 0.77% if the stock is issued prior to September 1, 2012 and quarterly thereafter, at a rate per annum equal to the greater of (i) three-month LIBOR plus 0.77% and (ii) 4.00%. The preferred stock may be redeemed at the option of the firm on the stock purchase dates or any day thereafter, subject to regulatory approval and certain covenant restrictions governing the firm’s ability to redeem or purchase the preferred stock without issuing common stock or other instruments with equity-like characteristics.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Preferred dividends declared are set forth below:
(1)
Excludes the one-time preferred dividend of $426 million related to the repurchase of the TARP Series H Preferred Stock in the second quarter of 2009, as well as $44 million of accrued dividends paid upon repurchase of the Series H Preferred Stock.
On January 19, 2010, the Board declared dividends of $239.58, $387.50, $255.56 and $255.56 per share of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stock and Series D Preferred Stock, respectively, to be paid on February 10, 2010 to preferred shareholders of record on January 26, 2010. In addition, the Board declared a dividend of $2,500 per share of Series G Preferred Stock to be paid on February 10, 2010 to preferred shareholders of record on January 26, 2010.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The following table sets forth the firm’s accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) by type:
(1)
Consists of net unrealized gains/(losses) of $84 million and $(55) million on available-for-sale securities held by the firm’s insurance subsidiaries as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively, and net unrealized gains of $3 million and $8 million on available-for-sale securities held by investees accounted for under the equity method as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 10.
Earnings Per Common Share
The computations of basic and diluted earnings per common share are set forth below:
(1)
The diluted EPS computations do not include the antidilutive effect of RSUs, stock options and warrants as follows:
Year Ended
One Month Ended
December
November
November
December
(in millions)
Number of antidilutive RSUs and common shares underlying antidilutive stock options and warrants
24.7
60.5
-
157.2
(2)
In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the firm adopted amended accounting principles which require that unvested share-based payment awards that have non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents be treated as a separate class of securities in calculating earnings per common share. The impact of applying these amended principles for the year ended December 2009 and one month ended December 2008 was a reduction in basic earnings per common share of $0.06 and an increase in basic and diluted loss per common share of $0.03, respectively. There was no impact on diluted earnings per common share for the year ended December 2009. Prior periods have not been restated due to immateriality.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 11.
Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The following table sets forth the carrying value of the firm’s goodwill by operating segment, which is included in “Other assets” in the consolidated statements of financial condition:
(1)
Primarily related to SLK LLC (SLK).
(2)
Primarily related to The Ayco Company, L.P. (Ayco).
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Identifiable Intangible Assets
The following table sets forth the gross carrying amount, accumulated amortization and net carrying amount of the firm’s identifiable intangible assets:
(1)
Primarily includes the firm’s clearance and execution and NASDAQ customer lists related to SLK and financial counseling customer lists related to Ayco.
(2)
Primarily includes VOBA related to the firm’s insurance businesses.
(3)
Primarily includes marketing-related assets and other contractual rights.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Substantially all of the firm’s identifiable intangible assets are considered to have finite lives and are amortized over their estimated lives. The weighted average remaining life of the firm’s identifiable intangible assets is approximately 11 years. “Depreciation and amortization” in the consolidated statements of earnings includes amortization related to identifiable intangible assets of $96 million, $240 million and $39 million for the years ended December 2009 and November 2008 and one month ended December 2008, respectively.
The estimated future amortization for existing identifiable intangible assets through 2014 is set forth below:
Note 12.
Other Assets and Other Liabilities
Other Assets
Other assets are generally less liquid, non-financial assets. The following table sets forth the firm’s other assets by type:
(1)
Net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $7.28 billion and $6.55 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively.
(2)
See Note 11 for further information regarding the firm’s goodwill and identifiable intangible assets.
(3)
Excludes investments of $2.95 billion and $3.45 billion accounted for at fair value under the fair value option as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively, which are included in “Trading assets, at fair value” in the consolidated statements of financial condition.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other Liabilities
The following table sets forth the firm’s other liabilities and accrued expenses by type:
(1)
Insurance-related liabilities are set forth in the table below:
Separate account liabilities are supported by separate account assets, representing segregated contract holder funds under variable annuity and life insurance contracts. Separate account assets are included in “Cash and securities segregated for regulatory and other purposes” in the consolidated statements of financial condition.
Liabilities for future benefits and unpaid claims include liabilities arising from reinsurance provided by the firm to other insurers. The firm had a receivable of $1.29 billion and $1.30 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively, related to such reinsurance contracts, which is reported in “Receivables from customers and counterparties” in the consolidated statements of financial condition. In addition, the firm has ceded risks to reinsurers related to certain of its liabilities for future benefits and unpaid claims and had a receivable of $870 million and $1.20 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively, related to such reinsurance contracts, which is reported in “Receivables from customers and counterparties” in the consolidated statements of financial condition. Contracts to cede risks to reinsurers do not relieve the firm from its obligations to contract holders. Liabilities for future benefits and unpaid claims include $1.84 billion and $978 million carried at fair value under the fair value option as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively.
Reserves for guaranteed minimum death and income benefits represent a liability for the expected value of guaranteed benefits in excess of projected annuity account balances. These reserves are based on total payments expected to be made less total fees expected to be assessed over the life of the contract.
(2)
Includes $598 million and $784 million related to consolidated investment funds as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 13.
Employee Benefit Plans
The firm sponsors various pension plans and certain other postretirement benefit plans, primarily healthcare and life insurance. The firm also provides certain benefits to former or inactive employees prior to retirement.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans and Postretirement Plans
Employees of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries participate in various defined benefit pension plans. These plans generally provide benefits based on years of credited service and a percentage of the employee’s eligible compensation. The firm maintains a defined benefit pension plan for most U.K. employees. As of April 2008, the U.K. defined benefit plan was closed to new participants, but will continue to accrue benefits for existing participants.
The firm also maintains a defined benefit pension plan for substantially all U.S. employees hired prior to November 1, 2003. As of November 2004, this plan was closed to new participants and frozen such that existing participants would not accrue any additional benefits. In addition, the firm maintains unfunded postretirement benefit plans that provide medical and life insurance for eligible retirees and their dependents covered under these programs.
On November 30, 2007, the firm adopted amended principles related to employers’ accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans which require an entity to recognize in its statement of financial condition the funded status of its defined benefit pension and postretirement plans, measured as the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the benefit obligation. Upon adoption, these amended accounting principles required an entity to recognize previously unrecognized actuarial gains and losses, prior service costs, and transition obligations and assets within “Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)” in the consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity, and to derecognize additional minimum pension liabilities.
As a result of adopting these amended accounting principles, the firm recorded in 2007 increases of $59 million and $253 million to “Other assets” and “Other liabilities and accrued expenses,” respectively, and a $194 million loss, net of taxes, within “Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss).”
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides a summary of the changes in the plans’ benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets for the years ended December 2009 and November 2008, as well as a statement of the funded status of the plans as of December 2009 and November 2008:
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $1.31 billion and $769 million as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively.
For plans in which the accumulated benefit obligation exceeded plan assets, the aggregate projected benefit obligation and accumulated benefit obligation was $1.39 billion and $1.29 billion, respectively, as of December 2009, and $426 million and $413 million, respectively, as of November 2008. The fair value of plan assets for each of these plans was $1.11 billion and $317 million as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively.
The components of pension expense/(income) and postretirement expense are set forth below:
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The weighted average assumptions used to develop the actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligation and net periodic pension cost are set forth below. These assumptions represent a weighted average of the assumptions used for the U.S. and non-U.S. plans and are based on the economic environment of each applicable country.
Generally, the firm determined the discount rates for its defined benefit plans by referencing indices for long-term, high-quality bonds and ensuring that the discount rate does not exceed the yield reported for those indices after adjustment for the duration of the plans’ liabilities.
The firm’s approach in determining the long-term rate of return for plan assets is based upon historical financial market relationships that have existed over time with the presumption that this trend will generally remain constant in the future.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
For measurement purposes, an annual growth rate in the per capita cost of covered healthcare benefits of 8.51% was assumed for the year ending December 2010. The rate was assumed to decrease ratably to 5.00% for the year ending December 2017 and remain at that level thereafter.
The assumed cost of healthcare has an effect on the amounts reported for the firm’s postretirement plans. A 1% change in the assumed healthcare cost trend rate would have the following effects:
The following table sets forth the composition of plan assets for the U.S. and non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans by asset category:
The investment approach of the firm’s U.S. and major non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans involves employing a sufficient level of flexibility to capture investment opportunities as they occur, while maintaining reasonable parameters to ensure that prudence and care are exercised in the execution of the investment programs. The plans employ a total return on investment approach, whereby a mix, which is broadly similar to the actual asset allocation as of December 2009, of equity securities, debt securities and other assets, is targeted to maximize the long-term return on assets for a given level of risk. Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis by the firm’s Retirement Committee through periodic portfolio reviews, meetings with investment managers and annual liability measurements.
The firm’s pension plan assets consist of collective bank trusts, mutual funds, corporate bonds, alternative investments (e.g., hedge funds), cash and short-term investments, and real estate investment trust holdings. Substantially all of the firm’s pension plan assets are classified within level 1 or level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2009. Only one investment, which is in the U.S. pension plan, is classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2009. This level 3 asset comprised less than 1% of the firm’s total pension plan assets as of December 31, 2009.
The firm expects to contribute a minimum of $49 million to its pension plans and $13 million to its postretirement plans in 2010.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth benefits projected to be paid from the firm’s U.S. and non-U.S. defined benefit pension and postretirement plans (net of Medicare subsidy receipts) and reflects expected future service costs, where appropriate:
Defined Contribution Plans
The firm contributes to employer-sponsored U.S. and non-U.S. defined contribution plans. The firm’s contribution to these plans was $178 million, $208 million and $258 million for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007, respectively.
Note 14.
Employee Incentive Plans
Stock Incentive Plan
The firm sponsors a stock incentive plan, The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (SIP), which provides for grants of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalent rights, restricted stock, RSUs, awards with performance conditions and other share-based awards. In the second quarter of 2003, the SIP was approved by the firm’s shareholders, effective for grants after April 1, 2003, and was further amended and restated, effective December 31, 2008.
The total number of shares of common stock that may be delivered pursuant to awards granted under the SIP through the end of our 2008 fiscal year could not exceed 250 million shares. The total number of shares of common stock that may be delivered pursuant to awards granted under the SIP in our 2009 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter cannot exceed 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock, determined as of the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year, increased by the number of shares available for awards in previous years but not covered by awards granted in such years. As of December 2009 and November 2008, 140.6 million and 162.4 million shares, respectively, were available for grant under the SIP.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other Compensation Arrangements
The firm has maintained deferred compensation plans for eligible employees. In general, under the plans, participants were able to defer payment of a portion of their cash year-end compensation. During the deferral period, participants were able to notionally invest their deferrals in certain alternatives available under the plans. Generally, under current tax law, participants are not subject to income tax on amounts deferred or on any notional investment earnings until the returns are distributed, and the firm is not entitled to a corresponding tax deduction until the amounts are distributed. Beginning with the 2008 year, these deferred compensation plans were frozen with respect to new contributions and the plans were terminated. Participants generally received distributions of their benefits in 2009 except that no payments were accelerated for certain senior executives. The firm has recognized compensation expense for the amounts deferred under these plans. As of December 2009 and November 2008, $9 million and $220 million, respectively, related to these plans was included in “Other liabilities and accrued expenses” in the consolidated statements of financial condition.
The firm has a discount stock program through which Participating Managing Directors may be permitted to acquire RSUs at an effective 25% discount (for 2009 and 2008 year-end compensation, the program was suspended, and no individual was permitted to acquire discounted RSUs thereunder). In prior years, the 25% discount was effected by an additional grant of RSUs equal to one-third of the number of RSUs purchased by qualifying participants. The purchased RSUs were 100% vested when granted, but the shares underlying them generally were subject to certain transfer restrictions (which were waived in December 2008 except for certain senior executives). The shares underlying the RSUs that were granted to effect the 25% discount generally vest in equal installments on the second and third anniversaries following the grant date and were not transferable before the third anniversary of the grant date (transfer restrictions on vested awards were waived in December 2008 except for certain senior executives). Compensation expense related to these RSUs is recognized over the vesting period. The total value of RSUs granted for 2007 in order to effect the 25% discount was $66 million.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Restricted Stock Units
The firm issues RSUs to employees under the SIP, primarily in connection with year-end compensation and acquisitions. RSUs are valued based on the closing price of the underlying shares on the date of grant after taking into account a liquidity discount for any applicable post-vesting transfer restrictions. Year-end RSUs generally vest and deliver as outlined in the applicable RSU agreements. All employee RSU agreements provide that vesting is accelerated in certain circumstances, such as upon retirement, death and extended absence. Of the total RSUs outstanding as of December 2009, November 2008 and December 2008 (i) 16.7 million units, 12.0 million units and 32.0 million units, respectively, required future service as a condition to the delivery of the underlying shares of common stock and (ii) 28.1 million units, 43.9 million units and 44.4 million units, respectively, did not require future service. In all cases, delivery of the underlying shares of common stock is conditioned on the grantees satisfying certain vesting and other requirements outlined in the award agreements. The activity related to these RSUs is set forth below:
(1)
The weighted average grant-date fair value of RSUs granted during the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007 and one month ended December 2008 was $151.31, $154.31, $224.13 and $67.60, respectively. The fair value of the December 2008 grant includes a 14.3% liquidity discount to reflect post-vesting transfer restrictions of up to 4 years.
(2)
The aggregate fair value of awards that vested during the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007 and one month ended December 2008 was $2.18 billion, $1.03 billion, $5.63 billion and $41 million, respectively.
(3)
Includes RSUs that were cash settled.
In the first quarter of 2010, the firm granted to its employees 27.1 million year-end RSUs, of which 14.1 million RSUs require future service as a condition of delivery and 13.0 million RSUs do not require future service. These RSUs are subject to additional conditions as outlined in the RSU agreements. Generally, shares underlying RSUs, net of required withholding tax, vest and deliver over a three-year period but are subject to post-vesting transfer restrictions through January 2015. These grants are not included in the above table.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock Options
Stock options granted to employees generally vest as outlined in the applicable stock option agreement. No options were granted in fiscal 2009. Year-end options granted in December 2008 will become exercisable in one-third installments in January 2010, January 2011 and January 2012. Shares received on exercise cannot be sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of until January 2014. Year-end 2008 options will expire on December 31, 2018. Year-end options granted in December 2007 will become exercisable in January 2011 and expire on November 24, 2017. Shares received on exercise of year-end 2007 options cannot be sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of until January 2013. All employee stock option agreements provide that vesting is accelerated in certain circumstances, such as upon retirement, death and extended absence. In general, all stock options expire on the tenth anniversary of the grant date, although they may be subject to earlier termination or cancellation under certain circumstances in accordance with the terms of the SIP and the applicable stock option agreement. The dilutive effect of the firm’s outstanding stock options is included in “Average common shares outstanding - Diluted” on the consolidated statements of earnings.
The activity related to these stock options is set forth below:
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007 and one month ended December 2008 was $484 million, $433 million, $1.32 billion and $1 million, respectively.
The options outstanding as of December 2009 are set forth below:
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The weighted average fair value of options granted for the year ended 2007 and in the one month ended December 2008 was $51.04 and $14.08 per option, respectively. Fair value was estimated as of the grant date based on a Black-Scholes option-pricing model principally using the following weighted average assumptions:
The common stock underlying the options granted for the year ended 2007 is subject to transfer restrictions through January 2013. The common stock underlying the options granted in the one month ended December 2008 is subject to transfer restrictions through January 2014. The value of the common stock underlying the options granted for the year ended 2007 and in the one month ended December 2008 reflects a liquidity discount of 24.0% and 26.7%, respectively, as a result of these transfer restrictions. The liquidity discount was based on the firm’s pre-determined written liquidity discount policies.
The following table sets forth share-based compensation and the related tax benefit:
(1)
Represents the tax benefit/(provision), recognized in additional paid-in capital, on stock options exercised and the delivery of common stock underlying RSUs.
As of December 2009, there was $983 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.59 years.
Note 15.
Transactions with Affiliated Funds
The firm has formed numerous nonconsolidated investment funds with third-party investors. The firm generally acts as the investment manager for these funds and, as such, is entitled to receive management fees and, in certain cases, advisory fees, incentive fees or overrides from these funds. These fees amounted to $2.52 billion, $3.14 billion, $3.62 billion and $206 million for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007 and one month ended December 2008, respectively. As of December 2009 and November 2008, the fees receivable from these funds were $1.04 billion and $861 million, respectively. Additionally, the firm may invest alongside the third-party investors in certain funds. The aggregate carrying value of the firm’s interests in these funds was $13.84 billion and $14.45 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively. In the ordinary course of business, the firm may also engage in other activities with these funds, including, among others, securities lending, trade execution, trading, custody, and acquisition and bridge financing. See Note 8 for the firm’s commitments related to these funds.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 16.
Income Taxes
The components of the net tax expense reflected in the consolidated statements of earnings are set forth below:
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. These temporary differences result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years and are measured using the tax rates and laws that will be in effect when such differences are expected to reverse.
Significant components of the firm’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are set forth below:
(1)
Relates primarily to the ability to utilize losses in various tax jurisdictions.
(2)
Before netting within tax jurisdictions.
(3)
Relates to depreciation and amortization.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The firm permanently reinvests eligible earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries and, accordingly, does not accrue any U.S. income taxes that would arise if such earnings were repatriated. As of December 2009 and November 2008, this policy resulted in an unrecognized net deferred tax liability of $2.34 billion and $1.08 billion, respectively, attributable to reinvested earnings of $16.21 billion and $11.60 billion, respectively.
During both 2009 and 2008, the valuation allowance was decreased by $19 million, primarily due to the utilization of losses previously considered more likely than not to expire unused.
The firm had federal net operating loss carryforwards, primarily resulting from acquisitions, of $266 million and $172 million as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively. The firm recorded a related net deferred income tax asset of $91 million and $56 million as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively. These carryforwards are subject to annual limitations on utilization and will begin to expire in 2016.
The firm had state and local net operating loss carryforwards, primarily resulting from acquisitions, of $1.78 billion and $2.59 billion as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively. The firm recorded a related net deferred income tax asset of $47 million and $97 million as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively. These carryforwards are subject to annual limitations on utilization and will begin to expire in 2012.
The firm had foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $24 million and $5 million as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively. No net deferred tax asset was recorded for these losses as it is more likely than not that the asset will not be realized. These carryforwards are subject to limitation on utilization and can be carried forward indefinitely.
The firm recorded valuation allowances on net operating losses of $46 million and $60 million as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively.
The firm had foreign tax credit carryforwards of $277 million and $334 million as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively. These carryforwards are subject to limitation on utilization and will begin to expire in 2019.
The firm had capital loss carryforwards of $99 million and $50 million as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively. The firm recorded a related net deferred income tax asset of $35 million and $17 million as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively. These carryforwards are subject to annual limitations on utilization and will begin to expire in 2010.
The firm adopted amended principles related to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes as of December 1, 2007 and recorded a transition adjustment resulting in a reduction of $201 million to beginning retained earnings.
The following table sets forth the changes in the firm’s unrecognized tax benefits (in millions):
(1)
Includes $175 million recorded in the one month ended December 2008.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of December 2009 and November 2008, the firm’s liability for unrecognized tax benefits reported in “Other liabilities and accrued expenses” in the consolidated statements of financial condition was $1.93 billion and $1.37 billion, respectively. As of December 2009 and November 2008, the firm reported a related deferred tax asset of $1.00 billion and $625 million, respectively, in “Other assets” in the consolidated statements of financial condition. If recognized, the net tax benefit of $921 million and $748 million, would reduce the firm’s effective income tax rate as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively. As of December 2009 and November 2008, the firm’s accrued liability for interest expense related to income tax matters and income tax penalties was $194 million and $111 million, respectively. The firm reports interest expense related to income tax matters in “Provision for taxes” in the consolidated statements of earnings and income tax penalties in “Other expenses” in the consolidated statements of earnings. The firm recognized $62 million, $37 million and $3 million of interest and income tax penalties for the years ended December 2009 and November 2008 and one month ended December 2008, respectively. It is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits could change significantly during the twelve months subsequent to December 2009. At this time, it is not possible to estimate the change or its impact on the firm’s effective tax rate over the next twelve months.
The firm is subject to examination by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and other taxing authorities in jurisdictions where the firm has significant business operations, such as the United Kingdom, Japan, Hong Kong, Korea and various states, such as New York. The tax years under examination vary by jurisdiction.
Below is a table of the earliest tax years that remain subject to examination by major jurisdiction:
(1)
IRS examination of fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007 began during 2008. IRS examination of fiscal 2003 and 2004 has been completed but the liabilities for those years are not yet final.
(2)
New York State and City examination of fiscal 2004, 2005 and 2006 began in 2008.
All years subsequent to the above years remain open to examination by the taxing authorities. The firm believes that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits it has established is adequate in relation to the potential for additional assessments. The resolution of tax matters is not expected to have a material effect on the firm’s financial condition but may be material to the firm’s operating results for a particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for that period.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
A reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate to the firm’s effective income tax rate is set forth below:
(1)
Primarily includes the effect of the liability increase as a result of adopting amended principles related to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes.
(2)
Primarily includes the effect of audit settlements.
Tax benefits/(provision) of approximately $(793) million, $645 million, $908 million and $0 for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007 and one month ended December 2008, respectively, related to the delivery of common stock underlying RSUs and the exercise of options, were recorded in “Additional paid-in capital” in the consolidated statements of financial condition and changes in shareholders’ equity.
Note 17.
Regulation and Capital Adequacy
The Federal Reserve Board is the primary U.S. regulator of Group Inc., a bank holding company that in August 2009 also became a financial holding company under the U.S. Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. As a bank holding company, the firm is subject to consolidated regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal Reserve Board. The firm’s bank depository institution subsidiaries, including GS Bank USA, are subject to similar capital requirements. Under the Federal Reserve Board’s capital adequacy requirements and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action (PCA) that is applicable to GS Bank USA, the firm and its bank depository institution subsidiaries must meet specific capital requirements that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory reporting practices. The firm and its bank depository institution subsidiaries’ capital amounts, as well as GS Bank USA’s PCA classification, are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Many of the firm’s subsidiaries, including GS&Co. and the firm’s other broker-dealer subsidiaries, are subject to separate regulation and capital requirements as described below.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth information regarding Group Inc.’s capital ratios as of December 2009 calculated in accordance with the Federal Reserve Board’s regulatory capital requirements currently applicable to bank holding companies, which are based on the Capital Accord of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel I). These ratios are used by the Federal Reserve Board and other U.S. federal banking agencies in the supervisory review process, including the assessment of the firm’s capital adequacy. The calculation of these ratios includes certain market risk measures that are under review by the Federal Reserve Board. The calculation of these ratios has not been reviewed with the Federal Reserve Board and, accordingly, these ratios may be revised in subsequent filings.
Risk-Weighted Assets (RWAs) under the Federal Reserve Board’s risk-based capital guidelines are calculated based on the amount of market risk and credit risk. RWAs for market risk include certain measures that are under review by the Federal Reserve Board. Credit risk for on-balance sheet assets is based on the balance sheet value. For off-balance sheet exposures, including OTC derivatives and commitments, a credit equivalent amount is calculated based on the notional of each trade. All such assets and amounts are then assigned a risk weight depending on, among other things, whether the counterparty is a sovereign, bank or qualifying securities firm, or other entity (or if collateral is held, depending on the nature of the collateral).
The firm’s Tier 1 leverage ratio is defined as Tier 1 capital under Basel I divided by adjusted average total assets (which includes adjustments for disallowed goodwill and certain intangible assets).
Federal Reserve Board regulations require bank holding companies to maintain a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 4% and a minimum total capital ratio of 8%. The required minimum Tier 1 capital ratio and total capital ratio in order to be considered a “well capitalized” bank holding company under the Federal Reserve Board guidelines are 6% and 10%, respectively. Bank holding companies may be expected to maintain ratios well above the minimum levels, depending upon their particular condition, risk profile and growth plans. The minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio is 3% for bank holding companies that have received the highest supervisory rating under Federal Reserve Board guidelines or that have implemented the Federal Reserve Board’s risk-based capital measure for market risk. Other bank holding companies must have a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4%.
The firm is currently working to implement the requirements set out in the Revised Framework for the International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel II) as applicable to it as a bank holding company. U.S. banking regulators have incorporated the Basel II framework into the existing risk-based capital requirements by requiring that internationally active banking organizations, such as Group Inc., transition to Basel II over several years.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
GS Bank USA, a New York State-chartered bank and a member of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), is regulated by the Federal Reserve Board and the New York State Banking Department (NYSBD) and is subject to minimum capital requirements that (subject to certain exceptions) are similar to those applicable to bank holding companies. GS Bank USA computes its capital ratios in accordance with the regulatory capital guidelines currently applicable to state member banks, which are based on Basel I as implemented by the Federal Reserve Board, for purposes of assessing the adequacy of its capital. In order to be considered a “well capitalized” depository institution under the Federal Reserve Board guidelines, GS Bank USA must maintain a Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6%, a total capital ratio of at least 10% and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 5%. In November 2008, the firm contributed subsidiaries into GS Bank USA. In connection with this contribution, GS Bank USA agreed with the Federal Reserve Board to minimum capital ratios in excess of these “well capitalized” levels. Accordingly, for a period of time, GS Bank USA is expected to maintain a Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 8%, a total capital ratio of at least 11% and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 6%.
The following table sets forth information regarding GS Bank USA’s capital ratios under Basel I as implemented by the Federal Reserve Board, as of December 2009.
Consistent with the calculation of Group Inc.’s capital ratios, the calculation of GS Bank USA’s capital ratios includes certain market risk measures that are under review by the Federal Reserve Board. Accordingly, these ratios may be revised in subsequent filings. GS Bank USA is currently working to implement the Basel II framework. Similar to the firm’s requirement as a bank holding company, GS Bank USA is required to transition to Basel II over the next several years.
The deposits of GS Bank USA are insured by the FDIC to the extent provided by law. The Federal Reserve Board requires depository institutions to maintain cash reserves with a Federal Reserve Bank. The amount deposited by the firm’s depository institution subsidiaries held at the Federal Reserve Bank was approximately $27.43 billion and $94 million as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively, which exceeded required reserve amounts by $25.86 billion and $6 million as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively. GS Bank Europe, a wholly owned credit institution, is regulated by the Irish Financial Services Regulatory Authority and is subject to minimum capital requirements. As of December 2009 and November 2008, GS Bank USA and GS Bank Europe were both in compliance with all regulatory capital requirements.
Transactions between GS Bank USA and its subsidiaries and Group Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates (other than, generally, subsidiaries of GS Bank USA) are regulated by the Federal Reserve Board. These regulations generally limit the types and amounts of transactions (including loans to and borrowings from GS Bank USA) that may take place and generally require those transactions to be on an arms-length basis.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The firm’s U.S. regulated broker-dealer subsidiaries include GS&Co. and Goldman Sachs Execution & Clearing, L.P. (GSEC). GS&Co. and GSEC are registered U.S. broker-dealers and futures commission merchants subject to Rule 15c3-1 of the SEC and Rule 1.17 of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which specify uniform minimum net capital requirements, as defined, for their registrants, and also effectively require that a significant part of the registrants’ assets be kept in relatively liquid form. GS&Co. and GSEC have elected to compute their minimum capital requirements in accordance with the “Alternative Net Capital Requirement” as permitted by Rule 15c3-1. As of December 2009, GS&Co. had regulatory net capital, as defined by Rule 15c3-1, of $13.65 billion, which exceeded the amount required by $11.81 billion. As of December 2009, GSEC had regulatory net capital, as defined by Rule 15c3-1, of $1.97 billion, which exceeded the amount required by $1.86 billion. In addition to its alternative minimum net capital requirements, GS&Co. is also required to hold tentative net capital in excess of $1 billion and net capital in excess of $500 million in accordance with the market and credit risk standards of Appendix E of Rule 15c3-1. GS&Co. is also required to notify the SEC in the event that its tentative net capital is less than $5 billion. As of December 2009 and November 2008, GS&Co. had tentative net capital and net capital in excess of both the minimum and the notification requirements.
The firm has U.S. insurance subsidiaries that are subject to state insurance regulation and oversight in the states in which they are domiciled and in the other states in which they are licensed. In addition, certain of the firm’s insurance subsidiaries outside of the U.S. are part of the Lloyd’s market (which is regulated by the U.K.’s Financial Services Authority (FSA)) and certain are regulated by the Bermuda Monetary Authority. The firm’s insurance subsidiaries were in compliance with all regulatory capital requirements as of December 2009 and November 2008.
The firm’s principal non-U.S. regulated subsidiaries include Goldman Sachs International (GSI) and Goldman Sachs Japan Co., Ltd. (GSJCL). GSI, the firm’s regulated U.K. broker-dealer, is subject to the capital requirements of the FSA. GSJCL, the firm’s regulated Japanese broker-dealer, is subject to the capital requirements imposed by Japan’s Financial Services Agency. As of December 2009 and November 2008, GSI and GSJCL were in compliance with their local capital adequacy requirements. Certain other non-U.S. subsidiaries of the firm are also subject to capital adequacy requirements promulgated by authorities of the countries in which they operate. As of December 2009 and November 2008, these subsidiaries were in compliance with their local capital adequacy requirements.
The regulatory requirements referred to above restrict Group Inc.’s ability to withdraw capital from its regulated subsidiaries. As of December 2009 and November 2008, approximately $23.49 billion and $26.92 billion, respectively, of net assets of regulated subsidiaries were restricted as to the payment of dividends to Group Inc. In addition to limitations on the payment of dividends imposed by federal and state laws, the Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC and the NYSBD have authority to prohibit or to limit the payment of dividends by the banking organizations they supervise (including GS Bank USA) if, in the relevant regulator’s opinion, payment of a dividend would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice in the light of the financial condition of the banking organization.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 18.
Business Segments
In reporting to management, the firm’s operating results are categorized into the following three business segments: Investment Banking, Trading and Principal Investments, and Asset Management and Securities Services.
Basis of Presentation
In reporting segments, certain of the firm’s business lines have been aggregated where they have similar economic characteristics and are similar in each of the following areas: (i) the nature of the services they provide, (ii) their methods of distribution, (iii) the types of clients they serve and (iv) the regulatory environments in which they operate.
The cost drivers of the firm taken as a whole - compensation, headcount and levels of business activity - are broadly similar in each of the firm’s business segments. Compensation and benefits expenses within the firm’s segments reflect, among other factors, the overall performance of the firm as well as the performance of individual business units. Consequently, pre-tax margins in one segment of the firm’s business may be significantly affected by the performance of the firm’s other business segments.
The firm allocates revenues and expenses among the three business segments. Due to the integrated nature of these segments, estimates and judgments have been made in allocating certain revenue and expense items. Transactions between segments are based on specific criteria or approximate third-party rates. Total operating expenses include corporate items that have not been allocated to individual business segments. The allocation process is based on the manner in which management views the business of the firm.
The segment information presented in the table below is prepared according to the following methodologies:
•
Revenues and expenses directly associated with each segment are included in determining pre-tax earnings.
•
Net revenues in the firm’s segments include allocations of interest income and interest expense to specific securities, commodities and other positions in relation to the cash generated by, or funding requirements of, such underlying positions. Net interest is included within segment net revenues as it is consistent with the way in which management assesses segment performance.
•
Overhead expenses not directly allocable to specific segments are allocated ratably based on direct segment expenses.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Segment Operating Results
Management believes that the following information provides a reasonable representation of each segment’s contribution to consolidated pre-tax earnings and total assets:
(1)
Net revenues include net interest income as set forth in the table below:
(2)
Net revenues include non-interest revenues as set forth in the table below:
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Trading and principal investments revenues include $36 million, $(61) million, $6 million and $(2) million for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007 and one month ended December 2008, respectively, of realized gains/(losses) on securities held within the firm’s insurance subsidiaries which are accounted for as available-for-sale.
(3)
Operating expenses include net provisions for a number of litigation and regulatory proceedings of $104 million, $(4) million, $37 million and $68 million for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007 and one month ended December 2008, respectively, that have not been allocated to the firm’s segments.
(4)
Pre-tax earnings include total depreciation and amortization as set forth in the table below:
Geographic Information
Due to the highly integrated nature of international financial markets, the firm manages its businesses based on the profitability of the enterprise as a whole. Since a significant portion of the firm’s activities require cross-border coordination in order to facilitate the needs of the firm’s clients, the methodology for allocating the firm’s profitability to geographic regions is dependent on estimates and management judgment.
Geographic results are generally allocated as follows:
•
Investment Banking: location of the client and investment banking team.
•
Fixed Income, Currency and Commodities, and Equities: location of the trading desk.
•
Principal Investments: location of the investment.
•
Asset Management: location of the sales team.
•
Securities Services: location of the primary market for the underlying security.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth the total net revenues, pre-tax earnings and net earnings of the firm by geographic region allocated based on the methodology referred to above, as well as the percentage of total net revenues, pre-tax earnings and net earnings for each geographic region:
(1)
Substantially all relates to the U.S.
(2)
EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa).
(3)
Consists of net provisions for a number of litigation and regulatory proceedings.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 19.
Interest Income and Interest Expense
The following table sets forth the details of the firm’s interest income and interest expense:
(1)
Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis based on contractual interest rates.
(2)
Primarily includes interest income on customer debit balances and other interest-earning assets.
(3)
Includes interest on unsecured short-term borrowings and short-term other secured financings.
(4)
Includes interest on unsecured long-term borrowings and long-term other secured financings.
(5)
Primarily includes interest expense on customer credit balances and other interest-bearing liabilities.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 20.
Parent Company
Group Inc. - Condensed Statements of Earnings
Group Inc. - Condensed Statements of Financial Condition
Group Inc. - Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:
Cash payments for third-party interest, net of capitalized interest, were $2.77 billion, $7.18 billion, $7.78 billion and $248 million for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007 and one month ended December 2008, respectively.
Cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds, were $2.77 billion, $991 million, $3.27 billion and $1 million for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007 and one month ended December 2008, respectively.
(1) Includes
$6.57 billion and $11.67 billion at fair value as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively.
(2) Includes
$13.67 billion and $10.90 billion at fair value as of December 2009 and November 2008, respectively.
(3) Unsecured
long-term borrowings with subsidiaries by maturity date are $1.05 billion in 2011, $98 million in 2012, $179 million in 2013, $64 million in 2014 and $309 million in 2015-thereafter.
(4) Prior
periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Quarterly Results (unaudited)
The following represents the firm’s unaudited quarterly results for the fiscal years ended December 2009 and November 2008. These quarterly results were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results. These adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.
(1)
Financial information for the three months ended March 2008, June 2008, September 2008 and December 2008 has not been included for the following reasons: (i) the three months ended February 2008, May 2008, August 2008 and November 2008 (collectively, the 2008 quarters) provide a meaningful comparison for the three months ended March 2009, June 2009, September 2009 and December 2009 (collectively, the 2009 quarters), respectively; (ii) there are no seasonal or other factors that would impact the comparability of the results for the 2009 quarters with the results for the 2008 quarters; and (iii) it was not practicable or cost justified to prepare this information.
(2)
The timing and magnitude of changes in the firm’s discretionary compensation accruals can have a significant effect on results in a given quarter.
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Common Stock Price Range
The following table sets forth, for the quarters indicated, the high and low sales prices per share of the firm’s common stock:
As of February 12, 2010, there were 11,720 holders of record of the firm’s common stock.
On February 12, 2010, the last reported sales price for the firm’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $153.93 per share.
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Selected Financial Data
(1)
Book value per common share is based on common shares outstanding, including RSUs granted to employees with no future service requirements, of 542.7 million, 485.4 million, 439.0 million, 450.1 million, 460.4 million and 485.9 million as of December 2009, November 2008, November 2007, November 2006, November 2005 and December 2008, respectively.
(2)
Includes employees, consultants and temporary staff.
(3)
Substantially all assets under management are valued as of calendar month-end.
(4)
Primarily includes hedge funds, private equity, real estate, currencies, commodities and asset allocation strategies.
(5)
Rounded to the nearest penny. Exact dividend amount was $0.4666666 per common share and was reflective of a four-month period (December 2008 through March 2009), due to the change in the firm’s fiscal year-end.
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Statistical Disclosures
Distribution of Assets, Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
The following table sets forth a summary of consolidated average balances and interest rates for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007:
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(1)
Consists of cash trading instruments, including equity securities and convertible debentures.
(2)
Derivative instruments are included in other noninterest-earning assets and other noninterest-bearing liabilities.
(3)
Primarily consists of cash and securities segregated for regulatory and other purposes and receivables from customers and counterparties.
(4)
Consists of short-term other secured financings and unsecured short-term borrowings, excluding commercial paper.
(5)
Interest rates include the effects of interest rate swaps accounted for as hedges.
(6)
Consists of long-term other secured financings and unsecured long-term borrowings.
(7)
Primarily consists of payables to customers and counterparties.
(8)
Assets, liabilities and interest are attributed to U.S. and non-U.S. based on the location of the legal entity in which the assets and liabilities are held.
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Changes in Net Interest Income, Volume and Rate Analysis
The following table sets forth an analysis of the effect on net interest income of volume and rate changes for the periods 2009 versus 2008 and 2008 versus 2007. In this analysis, changes due to volume/rate variance have been allocated to volume.
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Available-for-sale Securities Portfolio
The following table sets forth the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of available-for-sale securities at December 2009 and November 2008:
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(1)
Yields are calculated on a weighted average basis.
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Deposits
The following table sets forth a summary of the average balances and average interest rates for the firm’s interest-bearing deposits for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007:
(1)
Amounts are available for withdrawal upon short notice, generally within seven days.
Ratios
The following table sets forth selected financial ratios:
(1)
Based on net earnings applicable to common shareholders divided by average monthly common shareholders’ equity.
(2)
Based on net earnings divided by average monthly total shareholders’ equity.
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Short-term and Other Borrowed Funds (1)
The following table sets forth a summary of the firm’s securities loaned and securities sold under agreements to repurchase and short-term borrowings as of or for the years ended December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007 as indicated below:
(1)
Includes borrowings maturing within one year of the financial statement date and borrowings that are redeemable at the option of the holder within one year of the financial statement date.
(2)
Includes short-term secured financings of $12.93 billion as of December 2009, $21.23 billion as of November 2008 and $32.41 billion as of November 2007.
(3)
As of December 2009, November 2008 and November 2007, weighted average interest rates include the effects of hedging.
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Cross-border Outstandings
Cross-border outstandings are based upon the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council’s (FFIEC) regulatory guidelines for reporting cross-border risk. Claims include cash, receivables, securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed and cash trading instruments, but exclude derivative instruments and commitments. Securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities borrowed are presented based on the domicile of the counterparty, without reduction for related securities collateral held.
The following tables set forth cross-border outstandings for each country in which cross-border outstandings exceed 0.75% of consolidated assets as of December 2009 and November 2008 in accordance with the FFIEC guidelines:

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
There were no changes in or disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure during the last two fiscal years.

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out by Goldman Sachs’ management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. In addition, no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm are set forth in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 9B. Other Information
Not applicable.
PART III

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Information relating to our executive officers is included on pages 50 to 51 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Information relating to our directors, including our audit committee and audit committee financial experts and the procedures by which shareholders can recommend director nominees, and our executive officers will be in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 7, 2010, which will be filed within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (2010 Proxy Statement) and is incorporated herein by reference. Information relating to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our senior financial officers, as defined in the Code, is included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
Information relating to our executive officer and director compensation and the compensation committee of our board of directors will be in the 2010 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Information relating to security ownership of certain beneficial owners of our common stock and information relating to the security ownership of our management will be in the 2010 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2009, the last day of fiscal 2009, regarding securities to be issued on exercise of outstanding stock options or pursuant to outstanding restricted stock units and performance-based awards, and securities remaining available for issuance under our equity compensation plans that were in effect during fiscal 2009.
(1)
The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (SIP) was approved by the shareholders of Goldman Sachs at our 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is a successor plan to The Goldman Sachs 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (1999 Plan), which was approved by our shareholders immediately prior to our initial public offering in May 1999 and under which no additional awards have been granted since approval of the SIP.
(2)
Includes: (i) 62,363,847 shares of common stock that may be issued upon exercise of outstanding options; (ii) 44,278,092 shares that may be issued pursuant to outstanding restricted stock units, including 44,250,832 shares granted under the SIP and 27,260 shares granted under the 1999 Plan; and (iii) 110,506 shares that may be issued pursuant to outstanding performance-based units granted under the SIP. These awards are subject to vesting and other conditions to the extent set forth in the respective award agreements, and the underlying shares will be delivered net of any required tax withholding.
(3)
This weighted-average exercise price relates only to the options described in footnote (2). Shares underlying restricted stock units and performance-based units are deliverable without the payment of any consideration, and therefore these awards have not been taken into account in calculating the weighted-average exercise price.
(4)
Represents shares remaining to be issued under the SIP, excluding shares reflected in the second column. The total number of shares of common stock that may be delivered pursuant to awards granted under the SIP through the end of our 2008 fiscal year could not exceed 250 million shares. The total number of shares of common stock that may be delivered pursuant to awards granted under the SIP in our 2009 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter cannot exceed 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock, determined as of the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year, increased by the number of shares available for awards in previous years but not covered by awards granted in such years. There are no shares remaining to be issued under the 1999 Plan other than those reflected in the second column.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be in the 2010 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Information regarding principal accountant fees and services will be in the 2010 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)
Documents filed as part of this Report:
1.
Consolidated Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements required to be filed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are included in Part II, Item 8 hereof.
2.
Exhibits
2.1
Plan of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-74449)).
3.1
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 25, 2009).
3.2
Amended and Restated By-Laws of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 25, 2009).
4.1
Indenture, dated as of May 19, 1999, between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form 8-A, filed June 29, 1999).
4.2
Subordinated Debt Indenture, dated as of February 20, 2004, between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 28, 2003).
4.3
Warrant Indenture, dated as of February 14, 2006, between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.34 to the Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to Form S-3, filed on March 1, 2006).
4.4
Senior Debt Indenture, dated as of December 4, 2007, among GS Finance Corp., as issuer, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., as guarantor, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.69 to the Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 10 to Form S-3, filed on December 4, 2007).
4.5
Form of floating rate senior debt security (TLGP) issued under the Senior Debt Indenture, dated as of July 16, 2008, between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 28, 2008).
4.6
Form of fixed rate senior debt security (TLGP) issued under the Senior Debt Indenture, dated as of July 16, 2008, between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 28, 2008).
4.7
Form of floating rate Medium-Term Note, Series D (TLGP) issued under the Senior Debt Indenture, dated as of July 16, 2008, between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 28, 2008).
4.8
Form of fixed rate Medium-Term Note, Series D (TLGP) issued under the Senior Debt Indenture, dated as of July 16, 2008, between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 28, 2008).
Certain instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt securities of the Registrant and its subsidiaries are omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K. The Registrant hereby undertakes to furnish to the SEC, upon request, copies of any such instruments.
4.9
Senior Debt Indenture, dated as of July 16, 2008, between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.82 to the Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to Form S-3 (No. 333-130074), filed July 17, 2008).
4.10
Senior Debt Indenture, dated as of October 10, 2008, among GS Finance Corp., as issuer, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., as guarantor, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.70 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-154173), filed October 10, 2008).
10.1
The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 28, 2008).
10.2
The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Restricted Partner Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 24, 2006).
10.3
Form of Employment Agreement for pre-IPO Participating Managing Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-75213)).
10.4
Form of Agreement Relating to Noncompetition and Other Covenants (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-75213)).
10.5
Tax Indemnification Agreement, dated as of May 7, 1999, by and among The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and various parties (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-75213)).
10.6
Amended and Restated Shareholders’ Agreement, effective as of January 22, 2010, among The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and various parties.
10.7
Instrument of Indemnification (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-75213)).
10.8
Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 26, 1999).
10.9
Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 26, 1999).
10.10
Form of Indemnification Agreement, dated as of July 5, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 25, 2000).
10.11
Amendment No. 1, dated as of September 5, 2000, to the Tax Indemnification Agreement, dated as of May 7, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 25, 2000).
10.12
Letter, dated February 6, 2001, from The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. to Dr. Ruth J. Simmons (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.63 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 24, 2000).
10.13
Letter, dated February 6, 2001, from The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. to Mr. John H. Bryan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.64 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 24, 2000).
10.14
Letter, dated February 6, 2001, from The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. to Mr. James A. Johnson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.65 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 24, 2000).
10.15
Letter, dated December 18, 2002, from The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. to Mr. William W. George (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2002).
10.16
Letter, dated June 20, 2003, from The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. to Mr. Claes Dahlbäck (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 30, 2003).
10.17
Letter, dated March 31, 2004, from The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. to Ms. Lois D. Juliber (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 28, 2004).
10.18
Letter, dated April 6, 2005, from The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. to Mr. Stephen Friedman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 8, 2005).
10.19
Letter, dated May 12, 2009, from The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. to Mr. James J. Schiro (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 26, 2009).
10.20
Form of Amendment, dated November 27, 2004, to Agreement Relating to Noncompetition and Other Covenants, dated May 7, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 26, 2004).
10.21
Form of RSU Award Agreement for PMD Discount Stock Program (subject to transfer restrictions) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007).
10.22
Form of RSU Award Agreement for PMD Discount Stock Program (not subject to transfer restrictions) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007).
10.23
Form of RSU Award Agreement for PMD Discount Stock Program (subject to transfer restrictions) (French alternative award) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007).
10.24
Form of RSU Award Agreement for PMD Discount Stock Program (not subject to transfer restrictions) (French alternative award) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007).
10.25
Form of RSU Award Agreement for PMD Discount Stock Program (U.K. employee benefit trusts) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007).
10.26
Form of Year-End Restricted Stock Award (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007).
10.27
Form of Year-End Restricted Stock Award in Connection with Outstanding RSU Awards (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007).
10.28
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan for U.S. Participating Managing Directors (terminated as of December 15, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007).
10.29
Form of Year-End Option Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 28, 2008).
10.30
Form of Year-End RSU Award Agreement (not fully vested).
10.31
Form of Year-End RSU Award Agreement (fully vested).
10.32
Form of Year-End RSU Award Agreement (French alternative award).
10.33
Amendments to 2005 and 2006 Year-End RSU and Option Award Agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007).
10.34
Form of Non-Employee Director Option Award Agreement.
10.35
Form of Non-Employee Director RSU Award Agreement.
10.36
Description of Non-Employee Director Compensation.
10.37
Ground Lease, dated August 23, 2005, between Battery Park City Authority d/b/a/ Hugh L. Carey Battery Park City Authority, as Landlord, and Goldman Sachs Headquarters LLC, as Tenant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 26, 2005).
10.38
General Guarantee Agreement, dated January 30, 2006, made by The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 25, 2005).
10.39
Letter, dated November 10, 2006, from The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. to Mr. Rajat K. Gupta (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 13, 2006).
10.40
Goldman, Sachs & Co. Executive Life Insurance Policy and Certificate with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company for Participating Managing Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 25, 2006).
10.41
Form of Goldman, Sachs & Co. Executive Life Insurance Policy with Pacific Life & Annuity Company for Participating Managing Directors, including policy specifications and form of restriction on Policy Owner’s Rights (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 25, 2006).
10.42
Form of Signature Card for Equity Awards.
10.43
Form of Employment Agreement for post-IPO Participating Managing Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.50 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 24, 2006).
10.44
Form of Second Amendment, dated November 25, 2006, to Agreement Relating to Noncompetition and Other Covenants, dated May 7, 1999, as amended effective November 27, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 24, 2006).
10.45
Description of PMD Retiree Medical Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 29, 2008).
10.46
Letter, dated June 28, 2008, from The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. to Mr. Lakshmi N. Mittal (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 30, 2008).
10.47
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated September 29, 2008, between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 29, 2008).
10.48
General Guarantee Agreement, dated December 1, 2008, made by The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. relating to certain obligations of Goldman Sachs Bank USA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.80 to the Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Form S-3, filed March 19, 2009).
10.49
Form of Letter Agreement between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and each of Lloyd C. Blankfein, Gary D. Cohn, Jon Winkelried and David A. Viniar (incorporated by reference to Exhibit O to Amendment No. 70 to Schedule 13D, filed October 1, 2008, relating to the Registrant’s common stock (No. 005-56295)).
10.50
General Guarantee Agreement, dated November 24, 2008, made by The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. relating to the obligations of Goldman Sachs Bank (Europe) PLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.59 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 28, 2008).
10.51
Guarantee Agreement, dated November 28, 2008 and amended effective as of January 1, 2010, between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Goldman Sachs Bank USA.
10.52
Collateral Agreement, dated November 28, 2008, between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Goldman Sachs Bank USA and each other party that becomes a pledgor pursuant thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.61 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 28, 2008).
10.53
Form of Performance-Based One-Time RSU Award Agreement.
10.54
Form of Make-Whole One-Time RSU Award Agreement.
10.55
Form of Incentive One-Time RSU Award Agreement.
10.56
Form of Signature Card for Equity Awards (employees in Asia outside China).
10.57
Form of Signature Card for Equity Awards (employees in China).
10.58
Amendments to Certain Equity Award Agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.68 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 28, 2008).
10.59
Amendments to Certain Non-Employee Director Equity Award Agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.69 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 28, 2008).
10.60
Form of Year-End RSU Award Agreement (U.K.).
10.61
Form of Year-End Supplemental RSU Award Agreement (U.K.).
10.62
Form of Year-End Supplemental RSU Award Agreement (U.K. and France).
12.1
Statement re: Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends.
21.1
List of significant subsidiaries of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
31.1
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications.*
32.1
Section 1350 Certifications.*
99.1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Selected Financial Data.
Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, November 28, 2008 and November 30, 2007 and the one-month transition period ended December 26, 2008, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2009 and November 28, 2008, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, November 28, 2008 and November 30, 2007, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, November 28, 2008 and November 30, 2007 and the one-month transition period ended December 26, 2008, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, November 28, 2008 and November 30, 2007 and the one-month transition period ended December 26, 2008, and (vi) the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.*

This exhibit is a management contract or a compensatory plan or arrangement.
*
This information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.
By:
/s/ David A. Viniar
Name: David A. Viniar
Title:
Chief Financial Officer
Date: February 26, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
Capacity
Date
/s/ Lloyd C. Blankfein
Lloyd C. Blankfein
Director, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
February 26, 2010
/s/ John H. Bryan
John H. Bryan
Director
February 26, 2010
/s/ Gary D. Cohn
Gary D. Cohn
Director
February 26, 2010
/s/ Claes Dahlbäck
Claes Dahlbäck
Director
February 26, 2010
/s/ Stephen Friedman
Stephen Friedman
Director
February 26, 2010
/s/ William W. George
William W. George
Director
February 26, 2010
/s/ Rajat K. Gupta
Rajat K. Gupta
Director
February 26, 2010
/s/ James A. Johnson
James A. Johnson
Director
February 26, 2010
/s/ Lois D. Juliber
Lois D. Juliber
Director
February 26, 2010
/s/ Lakshmi N. Mittal
Lakshmi N. Mittal
Director
February 26, 2010
/s/ James J. Schiro
James J. Schiro
Director
February 26, 2010
II-1
Signature
Capacity
Date
/s/ Ruth J. Simmons
Ruth J. Simmons
Director
February 26, 2010
/s/ David A. Viniar
David A. Viniar
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
February 26, 2010
/s/ Sarah E. Smith
Sarah E. Smith
Principal Accounting Officer
February 26, 2010
II-2

---

Stock Performance Metrics:
Return: 0.0012151402188465
1-Day Return: $1_day_return
3-Day Return: $3_day_return
5-Day Return: $5_day_return
10-Day Return: $10_day_return
20-Day Return: $20_day_return
40-Day Return: $40_day_return
60-Day Return: $60_day_return
80-Day Return: $80_day_return
100-Day Return: $100_day_return
150-Day Return: $150_day_return
252-Day Return: $252_day_return