Dataset Preview
View in Dataset Viewer
Viewer
The full dataset viewer is not available (click to read why). Only showing a preview of the rows.
The dataset generation failed because of a cast error
Error code: DatasetGenerationCastError
Exception: DatasetGenerationCastError
Message: An error occurred while generating the dataset
All the data files must have the same columns, but at some point there are 3 new columns ({'video_name', 'A', 'Q'}) and 3 missing columns ({'q', 'video_id', 'a'}).
This happened while the json dataset builder was generating data using
hf://datasets/himanshu-iitd/xbsxjk/indomainsubset_cleaned_test_qa_formatted.json (at revision 4e7a12de717f052d246ee1fdae2cd95dd067b33c)
Please either edit the data files to have matching columns, or separate them into different configurations (see docs at https://hf.co/docs/hub/datasets-manual-configuration#multiple-configurations)
Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 2011, in _prepare_split_single
writer.write_table(table)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/arrow_writer.py", line 585, in write_table
pa_table = table_cast(pa_table, self._schema)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2302, in table_cast
return cast_table_to_schema(table, schema)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2256, in cast_table_to_schema
raise CastError(
datasets.table.CastError: Couldn't cast
video_name: string
A: string
Q: string
to
{'q': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'video_id': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'a': Value(dtype='string', id=None)}
because column names don't match
During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/parquet_and_info.py", line 1321, in compute_config_parquet_and_info_response
parquet_operations = convert_to_parquet(builder)
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/parquet_and_info.py", line 935, in convert_to_parquet
builder.download_and_prepare(
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1027, in download_and_prepare
self._download_and_prepare(
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1122, in _download_and_prepare
self._prepare_split(split_generator, **prepare_split_kwargs)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1882, in _prepare_split
for job_id, done, content in self._prepare_split_single(
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 2013, in _prepare_split_single
raise DatasetGenerationCastError.from_cast_error(
datasets.exceptions.DatasetGenerationCastError: An error occurred while generating the dataset
All the data files must have the same columns, but at some point there are 3 new columns ({'video_name', 'A', 'Q'}) and 3 missing columns ({'q', 'video_id', 'a'}).
This happened while the json dataset builder was generating data using
hf://datasets/himanshu-iitd/xbsxjk/indomainsubset_cleaned_test_qa_formatted.json (at revision 4e7a12de717f052d246ee1fdae2cd95dd067b33c)
Please either edit the data files to have matching columns, or separate them into different configurations (see docs at https://hf.co/docs/hub/datasets-manual-configuration#multiple-configurations)Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Open a discussion for direct support.
a
string | video_id
string | q
string |
|---|---|---|
Casein means milk base paint. | rTF_WrVSPPQ | On the topic of casein house paint- Is house paint really made with milk protein? If so, I think that's pretty interesting. |
Consequentialism is a theory about action rightness according to which an action is right if and only if it maximizes valuable states of affairs from the most impartial perspective, so some actions will have the property of being right and others wrong. What you are suggesting: That we should have a theory which allows us to produce an ordering relation on our actions without classifying actions as right or wrong may be defensible or not but such a theory isn t consequentialism, because it isn ⦠( read more of this comment ) | hACdhD_kes8 | At around 4:00, J. Driver argues that maximizing forms of consequentialism such as utilitarianism imply that not producing enough pleasure for society is ethically wrong. However, why is there even a notion of ethically good or ethically bad in the first place? Under a maximizing form of consequentialism, why can't we simply compare ethical actions relative to each other and call some ethical actions better than others? This gives us much more choice in how we view our actions.
I think it is⦠(
read
more
of this comment
) |
It is just your own interpretation of good. | hACdhD_kes8 | The example also begs the question, "What if you believe saving more people is LESS good?" that is to say we have a population problem, so saving 5 people instead of one creates more people who have more children and then there are more starving and sick and dying and more carbon emissions causing global warming than ever? When we had 1 billion people on the planet it wasn't enough we had to have 6 billion and now even more but we are choking out all other life and even our own lives now are in⦠(
read
more
of this comment
) |
By the power of Truth. | hACdhD_kes8 | at 0:15 what does the latin phrase " per veritatem vis" mean? |
No no no. Homeostasis is present in all life. The fact is that homeostasis refers to anything which you have to keep constant, not just body temperature. For reptiles and other cold-blooded animals they do not bother to keep their temperature the same. They heat it up and let it cool all the time. But, they do keep their salt content, food, water intake, etc. constant so that their body has constant levels of these important things. Don t think that homeostasis only applies to temperature. A⦠( read more of this comment ) | rSBbnHLR_cg | How does homeostasis work in cold blooded animals? |
Homeostasis is more than just temperature regulation. Put simply homeostasis is a living thing monitoring itself and attempting to keep itself from internal extremes. This means technical, yes lawrence try to keep homeostasis. That being said most fish are cold blooded meaning their body temperature changes depending on the temperature around them. If you happen to know what kind of fish Lawrence is then you can look up that type on the internet and find out how warm or cold they like their water. | rSBbnHLR_cg | Do fish have homeostasis? I want to learn if my pet fish Lawrence has homeostasis.
If he doesn't have homeostasis,I guess I should fill up his bowl with warm water. |
When your hair stands on end, it traps a layer of air around your skin and stops it from moving around as much as it would otherwise (imagine an army of cold air molecules running across a plain of flat skin, compared to one running through a forest of hair). Cacti spines use the same method to prevent the wind from leeching all their moisture. | rSBbnHLR_cg | At 1:40 it says that goosebumps help insulate the body. It would seem that your hair standing on end would do the opposite. Aren't goosebumps just a side effect of your skin contracting? How would the skin contracting help keep an even body temperature? |
Good thought. You might lose a little heat due to the extra surface area, but the warmth gained by the goosebumps would be greater. | rSBbnHLR_cg | At 1:35, wouldn't the extra surface area from goose bumps transfer heat away from my body if I were cold, thus creating the opposite result intended? |
The heart helps to maintain the homeostasis of the circulatory system. For example, when we exercise the heart beats faster and harder. This circulates more oxygenated blood to the muscles. | rSBbnHLR_cg | Does our heart have anything to do with homeostatis? |
One interesting thing that your cells can do in response to temperature changes is alter the viscosity of their cell membranes. They do this by adding or removing double bonds to the fatty acids within the membrane. EG: Cold makes the cell membrane more viscous, which makes it less able to function properly. The cell responds by adding double bonds to some of the fatty acids in the membrane, creating unsaturated fatty acids (unsaturated fats are like vegetable oil, saturated fats are like wax).⦠( read more of this comment ) | rSBbnHLR_cg | How does cells in the body along with the organelles help maintain homeostasis? |
A negative feedback loop is where the body adjusts a lot before reaching the base target or homeostasis. E.g. say if the you re driving and the speed limit is 30 but you re going at 18, you will try to reach the speed limit. However whilst you try to reach 30, you may accidently go to 35 but eventually you will reach 30. A positive feedback loop is where you travel away from homeostasis or the base target. E.g. If the speed limit is 30, you may decide to defy it and speed up, going 50 instead.⦠( read more of this comment ) | rSBbnHLR_cg | what is a negative and a positive feedback in homeostasis? |
Dogs actually do have sweat glands however they are only on the bottoms of the dogs feet so they pant to help cool off. | rSBbnHLR_cg | Something I don't get is how does a dog cool down? I heard they have no sweat glands. Is that why they pant? |
There are many body systems which need homeostasis, or balance. There are many different problems, including diabetes, Parkinson s, autoimmune diseases, and even drug and alcohol abuse which can cause serious problems with the body s ability to regulate itself. Check out these sites to find out more about dysautonomia, which is a term for problems with automatic bodily systems, such as body temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, etc. http://www.dysautonomiainternational.org/page.php?ID=150 ⦠( read more of this comment ) | rSBbnHLR_cg | What if people cannot perform Homeostasis properly? |
yes I believe it does,but if you want to check again then this is the website I used to get my information. http://www.biologymad.com/resources/A2%20Homeostasis.pdf | rSBbnHLR_cg | Does homeostasis work in birds too |
It will try to move to a place with an ideal temperature. | rSBbnHLR_cg | Since cold-blooded animals do not have homeostasis,what happens if a cold-blooded animal such a snake gets too hot or too cold? |
Diseases that affect body systems, like diabetes (kidneys, insulin-blood sugar problems), nervous system and autoimmune disorders, like Guillain-Barré Syndrome, Parkinson s, Multiple Sclerosis, HIV/AIDS, injuries, and also chronic abuse of drugs and/or alcohol--these all can cause problems with people s body systems being able to maintain homeostasis. or balance. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK400/ http://www.dysautonomiainternational.org/page.php?ID=150 | rSBbnHLR_cg | What could make people not have or be able to maintain homeostasis |
Without homeostasis- yes. However your body is trying to counteract this and raises your temperature through homeostasis. | rSBbnHLR_cg | if you got cold, like putting ice packs on yourself, wouldn't your body temperature go lower instead of higher? |
The body constricts the peripheral blood vessels and keeps more blood in the central (core) part of the body - where your heart and other organs are. It is a preservation technique. You could survive without an extremity but if your core dies, you die. | rSBbnHLR_cg | What does it mean by drawing blood away from the skin? |
atp (adenosine triphosphate) is the energy created in the krebs cycle (look it up) inside the mitochondria organelle | rSBbnHLR_cg | what is ATP and ADP |
Yes, its the body s way to produce heat | rSBbnHLR_cg | Wait, does shivering help keep you warm? |
assuming the stomach acid didn t destroy it and you didn t end up killing yourself by damaging your heart and/or other vital systems, yes eventually your body would rid you of the extra (it would be removed with your urine in case you were wondering). | rSBbnHLR_cg | I f you drank pure adrenalin, would be the same later? |
because of heat | rSBbnHLR_cg | why does your temperature chang |
Homeostasis is the process by which an organism s internal environment is kept stable despite changes in the external environment. For example, if it is cold, you shiver. This creates heat, and you will feel warmer. If it s hot around you, you ll sweat. The sweat cools you down. There are many other examples of how homeostasis helps your body. Your nervous system tells you how your external environment is. If your nervous system or almost any other system messes up, you don t know how your⦠( read more of this comment ) | rSBbnHLR_cg | what is homeostasis |
Did the chinese industrialiazation give us all the technology we have today. If the chinese hadn t shut it down, he would have talked about it, but seeing that it didn t really affect anything, talking about it would have been pointless. The virtuos cycle that the britisch had did something. The chinese broke it down without doing anything major. | zhL5DCizj5c | When you imply that China didn't have an industrial revolution, aren't you denying that China did industrialize to a significant degree in the 11th Century of the current era? IN 1018, iron smelters in China were producing an estimated 35,000 tons of iron a year. Sixty years later, that production had risen to over 100,000 tons. And with the ability to transport that iron on rivers and canals, that iron was brought to distant markets and enabled the production of agricultural tools, the⦠(
read
more
of this comment
) |
yes,but they used it for fire to warm and to light up.europeans used it for powering machines. hope this helped;) | zhL5DCizj5c | Didn't China use coal long before Europeans? Marco Polo part talked about it. |
It s still taking place right now | zhL5DCizj5c | when does industrial revolution take place? |
The Industrial Revolution began in Britain in the late 1700s and had spread to other countries at the time, like America. People like Thomas Newcomen, Richard Arkwright, Samuel Crompton, Edmund Cartwright and James Watt. Invented machines that brought forward the Industrial revolution. not many people have profit from the industrial revolution back then. it seems that only the wealthy people. and factory owners have benefited back then. but people like us, in the long run, have benefited from it. | zhL5DCizj5c | A few questions:
-When/Where was the Industrial Revolution?
-What were some famous people in the Industrial Revolution, and what did they do?
-Who profited the most from the Industrial Revolution?
These questions have been troubling me for a long time... |
Eli Whitney invented the Cotton Gin. | zhL5DCizj5c | I wonder, who thought of creating a machine for cotton? |
India may have spurred British industrialization because of India s non-industrial textiles. But that doesn t mean, and he doesn t say, that they were higher in industrial capability. In fact, he specifically states that Europe, India and China were relatively equivalent in industrial production. | zhL5DCizj5c | So basically,what John is saying is that the main reason Britain industrialised a lot was because of India?Is he saying that India was higher than Britain? |
that is mainly because of rapid industrialization..people who were ready to take up jobs related to industrialization were aid high wages and also people would ask themselves why become farmers when they can be paid better with other jobs? | zhL5DCizj5c | So, can anyone tell me why suddenly less than 1% of the population are now farmers and everyone else isn't |
Yes, that s correct. Also, bells are made of metal, so that would increase the chances even more. | uGjR338bHPs | ,,He wanted to explore the effects of lightning, which always strikes the highest point in the area" . Is this why churches, more precisely their bell towers were hit disproportionately higher than other buildings (assuming they were the highest buildings in the area)? |
He wanted to explore the effects of lighning, which always strikes the highest point in the area, like a tall tree or building. Therefore, in order to attract the lightnng and gather results, Franklin had to create something that would be the highest point for the lightning to strike, thus a kite was flown. | uGjR338bHPs | I still don't get why he did the kite experiments. |
I ve been told (but cannot verify it as the truth) that for a long time in Europe, the other buildings in a town were prohibited by law from being taller than the church as a show of piety. If this was true, even in places where it was no longer law, it would easily remain a matter of tradition. | uGjR338bHPs | Why were churches so high back then? I mean, if you see tall buildings getting hit all the time, you'd want to build short buildings, right? |
i think once they understood it installing a ligthning rod to give electricity a safe way down was both more effective and easier than remove the bells, after all even without the bells the tower would probably still be the highest point around and keep attracting ligthning just because of that. | uGjR338bHPs | Did they remove the church bells when they discovered that they were making the lightning hit more? |
I don t know exactly, but his inventions DID save many lives | uGjR338bHPs | was his inventions important in the war? |
He invented the Franklin stove, bifocals, Franklin electrostatic machine, Lightning protection system, and the Glass harmonica | uGjR338bHPs | Does anybody know all of what Benjamin Franklin invented? Thanks in advance! :) |
At the time when presidents were being elected, Franklin was almost 90 years old. He was focusing on his electricity experiments at the time, and probably didn t want to be president. George Washington was the only president to be elected unanimously too, so the people obviously wanted him to be president. | uGjR338bHPs | how come benjamin cant be president because he did alot so why not? |
What do mean by that? Do you mean when he did the kite experiment? | uGjR338bHPs | How old is Benjamin Franklin |
No! I finally found an answer. At this website (http://www.arrowsprings.com/html/making_glass_core_vessels.html) it describes a process using steel wool and a mandrel release compound. No dung required. | iBZb2bkn4KU | At 0:16: So even today core-formed glass is made with dung? |
One way to make a modern core is to wind steel wool around a thin metal rod - also called a mandrel. The shaped steel wool is then dipped into a clay slip - (watered down clay like material.) When it dries it can then be wrapped in molten glass. | iBZb2bkn4KU | Wonder where they found the artifacts? |
You can reheat it as many times as you want, but there is no point reheating it, when it is perfect. Actually, nothing is perfect. XD | iBZb2bkn4KU | Can you reheat the glass as many times as you want? |
Modern techniques use glassblowing, or molds, instead of core-forming. No dung required. | iBZb2bkn4KU | are some modern pots made with dung? |
The video showed that they knocked it out. :) | iBZb2bkn4KU | How do you take out the core? |
Great Question Personally, I don t think it is. Sarcasm is more of a mockery. Researchers call it unplain speaking. But I could be wrong. Article about Sarcasm http://people.howstuffworks.com/sarcasm.htm Here s an interesting dissertation by Christopher Potts http://www.stanford.edu/~cgpotts/dissertation/potts-dissertation-2up.pdf | YD82l_bUhLc | Would sarcasm be considered one of these types of implicature, or is it something else entirely? |
I think that it would be perceived as sarcasm if you said something like I m searching for buried treasure or if you said I m moving a shovel , it would probably be thought that you thought the answer to the question should be obvious. | YD82l_bUhLc | What about when a statement has multiple literal implications? For example, let's say I'm digging a hole and someone came and asked me what I was doing. There are several ways I could answer this question: I'm digging a hole, I'm moving this shovel, I'm searching for buried treasure, etc... Can these all be literal implications at the same time? What if I were to use more than one statement to answer this question? |
Google his name. He was a very popular philosopher and mostly gave lectures and wrote papers that are available to the public. Some of those titles include Logic and conversation (where the term implicature was first coined), Meaning , and Studies in the Way of Words . | YD82l_bUhLc | Wow. as someone interested in mental health, I'm loving these videos on linguistics and am very interested in learning more from Paul Grice. Can anyone recommended a good book of his to start with? |
No, this account does not touch on the morality of statements. Those things would be an ethical or moral discussion. This theory is a linguistic one so morality is not salient to the discussion. | YD82l_bUhLc | In the example of conversational implicature at around 2:00 where the woman declines to go on a date by saying, "I am tired," her words (though perhaps somewhat tactful) could easily have been false in the literal sense. Does the implied meaning negate the immorality of the lie? |
Because your statement was so direct I like chicken and then someone hands you a chicken and you answer them But I like broccoli . That would be a contradiction. | YD82l_bUhLc | Let's say someone says "I like chicken and I like broccoli," when they meant to say "I like chicken but I like broccoli." Is this obscured meaning part of the linguistic meaning of the sentence said? If so, does it fit into a different dimension of linguistic meaning or does it fit into a dimension presented in this video? |
Thanks for engaging with this video! I d like to address one thing you said though which is problematic: Oh, boy! Is this what passes for an argument these days? And from a Stanford professor no less? It s worth noting that Tom is explaining what William James argument was. In all of these videos, the faculty are trying to articulate claims or arguments that have been important to the field. Whether they endorse these arguments is unclear from the video and more importantly quite⦠( read more of this comment ) | uzmLXIuAspQ | Oh, boy! Is this what passes for an argument these days? And from a Stanford professor no less?
Let me explain this by way of analogy: If John breaks his leg he will need a crutch to help him walk. Since crutches help people with broken legs walk, then (by the reasoning offered in this video) anybody who is worried about someday having a broken leg should always use a crutch when walking (even when the leg isn't broken).
The crutch exists for those specific moments when it is needed for⦠(
read
more
of this comment
) |
Pascal s wager is a waste of time because there are so many religions that it s virtually impossible to choose the right one. | uzmLXIuAspQ | Hi, thanks for sharing this video, it was very thorough and for the most part, neutral. However, I'd like to give my input as a religiously secular individual.
I'm going to have to say that choosing faith over evidence because of "potential gains" still sounds a bit fallacious to me. It's a position that's very similar to Pascal's Wager, which states that a rational person should believe in God because of the consequences that would occur if he didn't, and the eternal rewards that he would be⦠(
read
more
of this comment
) |
There are definitely more nuances to Clifford s position. And of course, there are others who have taken Clifford s position and modified it to address certain objections. This was merely meant to be an introductory lecture to get one thinking about these questions and the various positions. A good place to continue the inquiry is: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-belief/. It goes a bit deeper into Clifford s position there and offers even more links if you want to continue the inquiry further. | uzmLXIuAspQ | How did Clifford jump from the shipowner's stalwart belief with little-to-no evidence being immoral, to casting such aspirations over all beliefs which are supported by little-to-no evidence?
For example, how could he justify calling belief in, say, the universe being inside the belly of a giant frog to be immoral? There is absolutely no evidence that says that the universe is in the belly of a giant frog, but if someone wants to believe that, I don't see how it could possibly hurt or⦠(
read
more
of this comment
) |
One could argue the will to believe, that one wants to believe due to the fact that one s parents believe as do all one s friends and that if one does not, one would be mad or outcast. It is true that some atheists are so because life went horribly wrong. It s not morally wrong to or to not believe, as long as that belief or lack of does not harm the self or others. As you said, there are multiple reasons to disbelieve. Agreed, the way we frame questions does have an effect on the answers. He⦠( read more of this comment ) | uzmLXIuAspQ | They say that "sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander." Doesn't it also make sense to look at this through a different lens. Namely, the will NOT to believe? The Will to reject?
Paul Vitz discusses how he believes some people come to atheism: through disappointment with their fathers. Leaving aside the the specific merits of Vitz's argument, I do think Vitz has a point in his assertion that there are some who are very much motivated to DISbelieve. Maybe somebody is angry (at G-d, religious⦠(
read
more
of this comment
) |
I think it s just a controversial way of starting off the video. I think it would have been better to say it s wrong to believe the unicorns exist, rather than choosing God (solely to avoid conflict), but he didn t. Either way, the video isn t so much about whether or not God is real, but whether or it it s morally ok to believe in something you know isn t true. | uzmLXIuAspQ | At 0:19 the narrator states that it is "wrong to believe that God exists". He is saying that, but he is not backing himself up. That makes no sense if he wants to get you to swallow that, even though there is an INCREDIBLE world and universe , and there are INCREDIBLY complex things(a human brain, for example), the whole world is a random chance! |
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/james/ | uzmLXIuAspQ | Who is this James guy they speak of at 4:30? Is he a real person? |
It is possible to review your beliefs and question them, and thus to change them. I, for one, agree with the quote the unexamined life is not worth living. | uzmLXIuAspQ | I have two problems with this video.
one is how can you will yourself into believing something. I migth choose not to look to closely at things that migth destroy my belief, like not go checking down at the bottom if the ship is leaking. But if i make that decision does that not allready mean that i really no longer belive the ship is seaworthy?
The other is alltough in principle i think you should only believe things for which you got evidence, i think nobody could live his life like that, you⦠(
read
more
of this comment
) |
Yes that is true. Ask yourself this: out of the 100% of knowledge in the world, how much do you know? And so you are saying that out of the rest of that, you KNOW that there s no God? | uzmLXIuAspQ | Even if you have no evidence of god existing you still can not KNOW he doesn't exist, until you die right? |
That evidence from Scripture could be the fact that the Bible is in fact written. In fact, have you ever read the Bible? If you haven t, you might want to- it s extremely complex. In fact, there has been mathematical studies that concluded it was not possible to be written by a man( or should I say, authored by a man) :) | uzmLXIuAspQ | At 0:42 Thomas says that P1) is disputed, stating that proponents of the god hypothesis bring forward "evidence from prayer" and "evidence from scripture". But how can these be described as evidence? They are not scientifically reproducible. Furthermore "evidence from scripture" relies heavily on the logical fallacies of begging the question i.e. circular arguments. |
This is why if you were to poll intelligent non believers you d find that they reject the affirmative statement about gods existence while they re careful not to reject the possibility of her existence. The intellectual honesty they re so proud of demands they acknowledge doubt wherever they find it and abstain from dogmatic belief (or disbelief). | uzmLXIuAspQ | This argument seems pretty two-sided to me. One could argue that because there is not sufficient evidence to disprove God's existence, then it is immoral to believe that God does not exist. Also, the very claim that "all beliefs lacking evidence are immoral" seems to be founded on insufficient evidence because it is based on a subjective view of what constitutes morality. |
It is all true: The truth is simply everything there is, everything that truly exists. If it does not exist, it is not the truth; if it does, it is. âThat which isâ is everything except for the deceptions created by the mind. The truth is incontrovertible; malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill 2 + 2 = 4: It does not equal anything else. The truth is, there is only one truth. Believing 2 + 2 = 5 or 6 or anything else does not make it true. There ⦠( read more of this comment ) | uzmLXIuAspQ | The average believer reacts in such a case:
The only reason why the boat sank was because the crew and/or the persons on board had not enough faith. And this was all God's punishment or 'he' works in mysterious ways.
And believers who are saved will even defend this 'truth', and feel special because they were spared. And others will confirm this, and make examples of them, it all had to do with their faith.
So let's collect money and build churchs so that we can seek to propagate the word.
⦠(
read
more
of this comment
) |
It s easier to make bold, varied lines in marker. You can use pencils for your drawings, though. :) | 6rEh6K56KYc | How come you don't use pencils |
Place? Well, so long as you have something to draw on and draw with, the location of where you do this shouldn t matter. In a swimming pool isn t recommended though :) If you meant tools of some sort (i.e. Photoshop, Clip Studio, or practical tools like a sketchpad, pen, marker, etc.,) then, as long as you can communicate your intention for the beat, that doesn t matter either. Use whatever you can draw with. My apologies if I m not understanding your question. | 6rEh6K56KYc | Is there a place where i can digitally make some beatboards for my story? |
If your saying how do I make my sketches quick and simple , than, skip all the small details and use only the main one . Be quick. But if you are talking about how can I work with being a perfectionist, than draw less boxes, if you did that you could turn it into a comic! Just remember that it will likely get thrown away, or never seen. | 6rEh6K56KYc | I always get bogged down into making my sketches perfect. Does anyone have advice for artists who are also perfectionists? |
Great question. Near the end of the video (about 1:45 onwards) the woman begins to discuss Kandinsky s aesthetics of simplifying the woodcuts and abstracting them as he progresses in his work. This is a clue that serves to steer us away from considering Wagner (and other composers such as R. Strauss and Mahler, who were all concerned with the gigantic and programmatic), and instead faces us towards the likes of Berg, Schoenberg, and especially Webern, who all embraced a pared-down style of⦠( read more of this comment ) | WdPMdGUeYGk | Was Kandinsky's goal a Gesamtkunstwerk-type piece, a la Wagner? |
The pictures in the book are not drawn by hand, but are made through the process relief printmaking. You can watch a video on the different types of printmaking here: https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/art-history-basics/artists-materials-techniques/printmaking/v/moma-printmaking-01 It s my guess that these particular prints are woodblock prints, which are made by carving the image into wood. | WdPMdGUeYGk | how dose they draw it? |
German. Although Kandinsky was Russian by birth, by this point in his career he was living in Germany. | WdPMdGUeYGk | What language did he write in? |
He created the woodcuts between 1907 and 1912, when he was approximately age 41-46. Some pictures are in museums so that they remain in good condition, but also so that the public may come and see famous works of art. | WdPMdGUeYGk | how old was he when he created that and why are some pictures only in some museums |
He started out in law and economics as a career, and was very successful, earning a professorship. However, color had always been important to him, so he seems to have started painting when he was around 30 years old. He moved to Germany, then, to try to get into Munich Academy, where he studied art. About 20 years later, just after publishing this book, he returned to Russia, but basically did not like the communist views on art and art theories, so after about 7 years, he returned to⦠( read more of this comment ) | WdPMdGUeYGk | i thought that Kandinsky was Russian. Why did he make a german book? |
Some people are just in the right place at the right time | WdPMdGUeYGk | I wonder why he wasn't as popular as some other artists. He has the same gifts and style as may other famous artists |
Here is a video of what is probably Kandinsky s best-known work, and what he personally considered to be his most complicated: https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/art-history/art-history-1907-1960-age-of-global-conflict/expressionism/v/wassily-kandinsky--composition-vii--1913 | WdPMdGUeYGk | What are Vasily Kandinsky's other famous works of art aside from "Klänge (Sounds)"? |
One can have a soul without consciousness. As said, a soul is a nonphysical thinking being. Do animals have souls? Why of course. They think all the time. My dog thinks about chasing his tail a lot. But do they have consciousness? AKA Self-awareness? This is debatable. Can an animal ponder earlier memories? Or is it when something happens in an animal s life, his thoughts move on, never thinking back into the past (nor the future, really, for to make predictions, you need data from the past).⦠( read more of this comment ) | hLy2KhCUwN0 | What makes soul and consciousness different in Locke's conception? Consciousness is about thought, memory... and only oneself can be aware of his consciousness. How about soul? |
Good question! Consciousness encompasses more than just memory, although identity does start becoming a very difficult subject for those with severe amnesia. Amnesia also does not typically erase all memories entirely. If we follow this logic, you could say that since you do not remember going to an event that it was not actually you who went to that event, but this is not what Locke suggests; It is primarily based on the continuity of consciousness itself. | hLy2KhCUwN0 | Does that mean that in case of Amnesia (loss of memory) ; the person lose his identity ?
That seams to me absurd!! |
Yes, I think, Locke would agree that two individuals with the same memory are indeed the same person. | hLy2KhCUwN0 | So would Locke's argument of personal identity be plausible in aspect to reincarnation? For example, although controversial, some people, especially children claim to or believe to have memories of being (or that seem to belong to) another person after they have passed on. |
Yes, precisely. The point of senility is in part touched on earlier in the playlist RE: the concept of vegetative states , and also in Part 3 of this discussion as you will see, manifest in the Brave Officer problem. It deals with transitivity, and the remembering of some important memories, but forgetting others. | hLy2KhCUwN0 | So under Locke's definition of identity, does that mean that people who become senile no longer have the same identity. Also a young child would not have the memories of their later life, so does that mean that the young child does not have the identity of their older self, but the older self has the identity of the younger child. |
Part 3 answers this question or at least addresses some of the problems . I won t spoil it here, but the answers start at 1:34 of the third video. | hLy2KhCUwN0 | So what would you say about a person that has either short-term memory loss or long term memory loss? Are they not the same person because they can't remember their previous thoughts? For example if they can't remember what they did five minutes ago; are they always considered a "new person." Where does their consciousness go? |
Are you talking about perdurantism? Interesting idea. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perdurantism | hLy2KhCUwN0 | I think the application of worm theory would work here. A person is the same if his time worm is the same as his time worm. Which is easy to imagine and think about |
As I answered another question, part 3 addresses this. I think you d like the video. | hLy2KhCUwN0 | Most of the things we do, we can't remember. By Locke's account, in what way are we our past selves to any notable extent? For instance, I can only remember a few of the details of every little thing I did last week--certainly not even half of the things I was consciously aware of when I was doing them. If I think even further back--say, 10 years--I can (with a few minor exceptions) only remember fairly major life events. By this measure, it would seem Lock's criteria actually argues against⦠(
read
more
of this comment
) |
The key point is that 0! = 1, so (n - k)! = 1 when n = k. This may be unintuitive but there are various reasons why mathematicians decided this. One reason is simply so this formula works. That is, factorials are defined as the number of permutations of a set. Another reason is that we re using multiplication and 1 is the identity value in multiplication (that means multiplying anything by 1 doesn t change its value; with addition, 0 is the identity value, since adding 0 doesn t change the value⦠( read more of this comment ) | Eo21CfNJfCs | At 1:58 I'm having trouble understanding what happens when n equals k. I know the answer is 1 but it looks like this equation would come down to zero in the denominator. What am I missing? |
There is a tutorial on Khan Academy that might help: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/precalculus/prob_comb/combinatorics_precalc/v/factorial-and-counting-seat-arrangements | Eo21CfNJfCs | I don't quite understand how this stuff works, any other videos i could watch first?
(i have seen allof the videos in this section) |
The key point is that 0! = 1, so (n - k)! = 1 when n = k. | Eo21CfNJfCs | I am new to this subject and am only in Gr.4 so it`s kinda early to learn this. I was following along until this. Can someone please explain this a little more similar? Also, what does it mean by n equals k?
Please answer quickly! I have a quiz coming up! I need this FAST! thanks a lot if you answered. It means a lot to me. |
it does not! 6*5*4 / 3! becomes 6! /3!. 6*5*4 / 3! = (6*5*4)*(3*2*1) / (3! * 3*2*1) = 6! / 3!*3! | Eo21CfNJfCs | on 0:50 i dont get why our 6! / 3! became 6! / 3! * 3! ? where did the second 3! come from? |
you could major in Computer science or Any type of science and math pretty much! Hope this helped!! | Eo21CfNJfCs | what degree do i get to be able to make crowds for movies |
Not quite: 6! = 720 3! * 3! = 36 | Eo21CfNJfCs | would that mean 6! = 3!*3! ? |
Yes, because they thought n+k-! would be simple to remember! | Eo21CfNJfCs | at 1:22 can it also be n+k-1 ? |
I actually used the pause button. Were you in an environment that precluded you from doing the same? | LBNtChg4t4k | I wish she paused to let people choose. |
This is the same thing that I was thinking. With Drug A, we know that 200 people will live and she implies that there is a chance that some of the 400 people will live also, since she says 200 million will live for sure . With Drug C, we know that 400 people will die and she implies that there is a chance some of the 200 people will also dies, since she says 400 million will die for sure . I don t think the wording in this video was the best, but I have seen this scenario on other websites⦠( read more of this comment ) | LBNtChg4t4k | In fact, she told that drug C will kill 400 million people for sure, but she didn't mention that other 200 millions will be saved. Maybe even she was meant it, I had a thing in my mind that still other 200 millions in the risk of death. |
Songwriters absolutely RELY on this, and I think most other creatives do as well. The nice thing is that in making a story with which YOU connect, you have a good chance of creating something with which others will connect in a myriad of unexpected ways. | ZyNvgFmBQTs | Hello everybody!
When we're speaking about specific movie and specific character, is it possible that two people watching it can define different wants and needs depending on their personal experience and journey?
Say, in Monsters, Inc someone says that Sully needs to be a father, and then someone says that he needs to be a caring friend.
Is there "right" and "wrong" way of answering to the question of wants and needs? Or it is okay that different people might see different ones.
Thank you for the opinions. |
What makes him those things are the obstacles. | ZyNvgFmBQTs | To create the obstacles believable and important to your character, must be a great exercise that helps you build him better. What makes him nervous? Weak? Envious? Fragile? Stubborn? |
I enjoy a combination. In one of my favorite movies, The Quiet Man, the protagonist must deal with the guilt of having killed a man, the shame of being called a coward, the pain of losing the confidence of his wife, and finally the towering might of his critic, Squire Danniher. The fight at the end (physical) is one of the best emotional payoffs I ve seen BECAUSE of the emotional obstacles we ve overcome. | ZyNvgFmBQTs | In your opinion which is more memorable: an emotional obstacle or a physical obstacle? |
emotional, for me, are the best. a physical obstacle can be fun, but it s not always so important to the story or character, but an emotional obstacle can really leave an impression on you. it can be memorable and leave you with this wonderful feeling that will stay with you for a long time. | ZyNvgFmBQTs | xD Play it at 2x speed |
SpiderMan want peace and his city to be safe..yet he has to face the green goblin....Also he want to be in a relationship with MJ...yet his internal conflict is a shade of insecurity | ZyNvgFmBQTs | Conflict can be a tricky thing for certain stories. The conflict can't be something that goes against the rules of the world but at the same time, your character shouldn't be able to resolve the conflict quickly and easily, that would make them over powered. I believe the easiest way to deal with conflict, whether it's creating or resolving it, is to add more characters, not one person can deal with a conflict on there own and not one person can be a conflict on their own. Internal conflict can⦠(
read
more
of this comment
) |
It can really depend on the kind of character that you have constructed. If the character is a bit snobbish, they might feel pride, which could lead to arrogance. If your character is the stereotypical noble, they might feel just relief inside. And this cause and effect relationship continues with any character that you construct. | ZyNvgFmBQTs | So pretty much, it's like we put a large stone in front of our character. But, this rock, does something to their minds to make them afraid of it, or, make them not want to even touch it. But, they are determent to get past it for some reason. And, in the end, they get past it and find something that wasn't there before. Pride? Accomplishment? Relief? What is it? |
I believe that they use this method for most water scene s. | 4bCQ3ayF6Ec | On creating water surface using particles do you use this method on every water scene in pixar movies? |
When you change the heat in this program, you are not changing the heat of the particles, you are changing where the line is drawn. For example, if the value is 100, then you draw a line through all the points that are 100 degrees. If you increase the temperature, then you draw a line through warmer points. Warmer points will be those closer to the center of the particles, so the shape will be smaller. | 4bCQ3ayF6Ec | I thought when particles heat up they expend not vice versa? can you please explain why this is exact opposite |
Sometimes, graphics programs call them meta-balls . But you can impress your friends by calling them iso-potential surfaces , which is the long version of isosurfaces mentioned above. | 4bCQ3ayF6Ec | What is the method of treating each particle like a heat source to create a more realistic water simulation called? |
There s something called marching squares that can be used for efficient meta balls, though I ve not yet had a chance to try it myself: http://jamie-wong.com/2014/08/19/metaballs-and-marching-squares/ | 4bCQ3ayF6Ec | I made some basic Metaballs, you can see them in this program:
https://www.khanacademy.org/cs/_/6181938268798976
But, I was wondering if there was a more efficient way of generating Metaballs other than just going through each "cell" and seeing if its inside one. |
This video uses heat as an example to intuitively explain the concept of contour lines. If we treat the centers of the particles as heat sources, we can find contour lines of points where the heat is equal to some constant. The particles aren t actually heat sources, this is just an easy way to understand what the contour lines are without getting into technical definitions. We can find these contour lines mathematically, without talking about heat or temperature at all. | 4bCQ3ayF6Ec | So, it means that the "temperature" isn't that "temperature"which we are familiar with, it is just a metaphor. Am I correct? |
You are right. What was shown in the proof is that the calculated point is always on the curve. Not that the curve is a segment of a parabola. | a6JFpAMgy94 | I understand all "mechanical" part of this, but I do not get it how this proves that point P lies on the parabola. |
Yes, you re right - the point is always one the curve because the curve is defined by the points. This proof is demonstrating that, given that the point is one the curve, then the equation for the curve is P = (1 - t)Q + tR, that is that it is t along the line QR. | a6JFpAMgy94 | I'm confused.
How and why do you prove that the point is always on the curve?
I thought the curve is defined by the points
If the curve is defined before the points are defined, how did you define the curve? |
The proof is fine, though the video is not so clear. First of all, let s take an example: The point P lies on a line called XY and thus, we are able to represent the point P by the formula: P = (1 - t)X + tY The fact that you can represent a point on a line with this kind of formula is reversible - it also shows that, given this formula, the point P must be somewhere along the line XY. So, back to the video, you pick a point on the QR line which corresponds to: P = (1 - s)Q + sR According to⦠( read more of this comment ) | a6JFpAMgy94 | Isn't this proof backwards? It proves that if
P = (1 - s)Q + sR
then
P = (1 - t)Q' + tR'
and therefore P lies on the intersection of QR and Q'R'. It does not appear to prove that if P is the intersection of QR and Q'R' then P = (1 - s)Q + sR. |
P = (1 - s)Q + s R -------> (1 - t)Q + t R ( Here they substituting or rearranging he equations for Q{= (1 - t)A + t B} and R{= (1 - t)b + t c} ) So, the equation becomes P = (1-s)Q + s R. P = (1-s) ((1-t)A + t B) + s ((1-t)B + t C). P = (1-s)(1-t)A + (1-s)(t B) + s(1-t)B + st C. P = (1-s)(1-t)A + (s(1-t) + t(1-s))B + st C. This is the derivation of the equation given in the video. Hope you understand it. | a6JFpAMgy94 | Is there somewhere you can direct me to see the steps for simplifying the equation P=(1-s)Q +sR? I am getting lost in the translation provided in the video.
Thanks,
Scott. |
End of preview.
README.md exists but content is empty.
Use the Edit dataset card button to edit it.
- Downloads last month
- 0