Datasets:
File size: 8,831 Bytes
fcaedcb |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 |
---
license: cc-by-nc-4.0
task_categories:
- question-answering
- other
language:
- en
tags:
- philosophy
pretty_name: PhilPapers Survey 2020
size_categories:
- n<1K
source_datasets:
- philpapers
task_ids:
- multiple-choice-qa
- abstractive-qa
dataset_info:
features:
- name: a_priori_knowledge
dtype: float32
- name: abstract_objects
dtype: float32
- name: aesthetic_value
dtype: float32
- name: aim_of_philosophy
dtype: float32
- name: analytic_synthetic_distinction
dtype: float32
- name: eating_animals_and_animal_products
dtype: float32
- name: epistemic_justification
dtype: float32
- name: experience_machine
dtype: float32
- name: external_world
dtype: float32
- name: footbridge
dtype: float32
- name: free_will
dtype: float32
- name: gender
dtype: float32
- name: god
dtype: float32
- name: knowledge_claims
dtype: float32
- name: knowledge
dtype: float32
- name: laws_of_nature
dtype: float32
- name: logic
dtype: float32
- name: meaning_of_life
dtype: float32
- name: mental_content
dtype: float32
- name: meta_ethics
dtype: float32
- name: metaphilosophy
dtype: float32
- name: mind
dtype: float32
- name: moral_judgment
dtype: float32
- name: moral_motivation
dtype: float32
- name: newcombs_problem
dtype: float32
- name: normative_ethics
dtype: float32
- name: perceptual_experience
dtype: float32
- name: personal_identity
dtype: float32
- name: philosophical_progress
dtype: float32
- name: political_philosophy
dtype: float32
- name: proper_names
dtype: float32
- name: race
dtype: float32
- name: science
dtype: float32
- name: teletransporter
dtype: float32
- name: time
dtype: float32
- name: trolley_problem
dtype: float32
- name: truth
dtype: float32
- name: vagueness
dtype: float32
- name: zombies
dtype: float32
- name: philosophical_methods
dtype: float32
---
# Dataset Card for PhilPapers Survey 2020
The PhilPapers Survey 2020 dataset contains the results of a survey conducted among professional philosophers on various philosophical topics.
This JSON file is offered as a more accessible format for analyzing the survey results and exploring philosophical trends, in addition to the published paper.
The data is published here with direct permission from PhilPapers.org, and shared exclusively for non-commercial use.
## <u>Dataset Details</u>
#### Dataset Description
The PhilPapers Survey 2020 dataset is a collection of survey responses from professional philosophers on a wide range of philosophical topics, such as epistemology, metaphysics, ethics, and more. The survey was conducted by the PhilPapers website in 2020 to gather insights into the views and opinions of contemporary philosophers.
- **Curated by:** [Greyson Jenkins](https://linkedin.com/in/greysonjenkins)
- **Funded by:** [PhilPapers](https://philpapers.org/), [ANU Centre for Consciousness](https://philosophy.cass.anu.edu.au/centres/consciousness), and the [John Templeton Foundation](https://www.templeton.org/?gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAjwx-CyBhAqEiwAeOcTdRb4Ze19TwZ3nlEYguBDWvd9MjtJmdfkYOiOyPx7UXoe1pLufEyfxhoCJRcQAvD_BwE)
- **Shared by:** [David Bourget](https://www.dbourget.com/) and [David J. Chalmers](https://consc.net/)
- **Language(s) (NLP):** English
- **License:** [CC BY-NC 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
#### Dataset Sources
- **Paper:** Bourget, D. & Chalmers, D. J., (2023) "Philosophers on Philosophy: The 2020 PhilPapers Survey", ***Philosophers' Imprint*** 23: 11. doi: https://doi.org/10.3998/phimp.2109
## <u>Uses</u>
#### Direct Use
The PhilPapers Survey 2020 dataset can be used for various purposes, such as:
- Analyzing the views and opinions of contemporary philosophers on different philosophical topics.
- Comparing the results with previous PhilPapers surveys to identify trends and shifts in philosophical thought.
- Conducting research on the current state of philosophy and the distribution of philosophical views among professionals.
Commercial use of the dataset is strictly prohibited.
#### Out-of-Scope Use
The dataset should not be used to make generalizations about the views of all philosophers, as the survey sample is limited to professional philosophers who chose to participate. The dataset also does not provide a comprehensive overview of all philosophical topics and may not capture the full diversity of philosophical perspectives.
## <u>Dataset Structure</u>
The dataset is provided in a JSON format, with each key-value pair representing a philosophical question and the corresponding percentage of responses for each answer option. The questions cover various philosophical topics, and the answer options typically include specific philosophical positions or stances.
## <u>Dataset Creation</u>
#### Curation Rationale
The PhilPapers Survey 2020 was conducted to gather up-to-date information on the views and opinions of professional philosophers across a wide range of philosophical topics. The survey results provide valuable insights into the current state of philosophy and can serve as a resource for researchers, students, and anyone interested in contemporary philosophical thought.
#### Data Collection and Processing
The survey data was collected through an online questionnaire administered by the PhilPapers website. Professional philosophers were invited to participate in the survey, and their responses were recorded and anonymized. The collected data was then processed and aggregated to calculate the percentage of responses for each answer option.
The survey was open to professional philosophers from 15 October 2020 to 16 November 2020. Invitations were sent to 7,685 individuals in two groups: one group from Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, the UK, and the US (6,112 philosophers), and a second group for all remaining countries (1,573 philosophers) 1,785 responses were received, yielding a response rate of 23.2%.
#### Who are the source data producers?
The source data producers are the professional philosophers who participated in the PhilPapers Survey 2020. The survey was open to philosophers from various backgrounds and institutions worldwide, with a focus on those with faculty positions or PhDs in philosophy.
The survey's target population primarily consists of English-publishing philosophers (defined as individuals with one or more English-language publications in the PhilPapers database).
#### Personal and Sensitive Information
The dataset does not contain any personal or sensitive information about the survey participants. The responses are anonymized and aggregated to protect the privacy of the individuals involved.
## <u>Bias, Risks, and Limitations</u>
The PhilPapers Survey 2020 dataset has some limitations and potential biases to consider:
- The survey sample is limited to professional philosophers who chose to participate, which may not be representative of all philosophers or philosophical views.
- The selection of questions and answer options may not cover all relevant philosophical topics or perspectives.
- The aggregated nature of the data limits the ability to perform granular analyses or draw conclusions about individual respondents.
#### Recommendations
Users should be aware of the limitations and potential biases of the dataset when interpreting and drawing conclusions from the survey results. The dataset should be used in conjunction with other sources and methods to gain a comprehensive understanding of philosophical views and trends.
## <u>Citation</u>
**BibTeX:**
```bibtex
@article{bourgetchalmers2023,
title={Philosophers on Philosophy: The 2020 PhilPapers Survey},
author={Bourget, David and Chalmers, David J.},
journal={Philosophers' Imprint},
volume={23},
number={11},
year={2023},
doi={10.3998/phimp.2109}
}
```
**APA:** Bourget, D. & Chalmers, D. J., (2023) "Philosophers on Philosophy: The 2020 PhilPapers Survey", ***Philosophers' Imprint*** 23: 11. doi: https://doi.org/10.3998/phimp.2109
## <u>More Information</u>
For more information about the PhilPapers Survey 2020 and its methodology, please refer to the original paper: Bourget, D. & Chalmers, D. J., (2023) "Philosophers on Philosophy: The 2020 PhilPapers Survey", ***Philosophers' Imprint*** 23: 11. doi: https://doi.org/10.3998/phimp.2109
Alternatively, you can view the paper in your browser [here](https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/phimp/article/id/2109/), or visit the original survey page [here](https://survey2020.philpeople.org/).
#### Dataset Card Author
[Greyson Jenkins](https://linkedin.com/in/greysonjenkins)
#### Dataset Contact
Email [Greyson Jenkins](mailto:greyjenkins@live.com) |