TO THE PLAINTIFF FOR EXAMINATION.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 10
THE OBJECTION IS SUSTAINED THE REQUEST BEING OVERBROAD AND DEALING WITH MATTERS UNRELATED TO THE PLAINTIFF'S ALLEGATIONS.
THE OBJECTION IS OVERRULED AS TO THOSE DOCUMENTS CONTAINING ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF REAL ESTATE ACCOUNTING CT Page 13889 PRINCIPLES SIMILAR TO THOSE ASSERTED BY THE PLAINTIFF.
TO THE EXTENT ANY SUCH DOCUMENTS EXIST, REPLICATING COMPLAINTS MADE BY PLAINTIFF, THE DEFENDANT MAY PROTECT THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF THESE OTHER COMPLAINANTS. IF AT TIME OF TRIAL, THE TRIAL JUDGE CONCLUDES THAT DISCLOSURE OF COMPLAINANTS IS CRITICAL TO THE PLAINTIFF'S CASE, THEN THE MATTER OF DISCLOSING NAMES MAY BE REVISITED.
DISCLOSURE WHERE AUTHORIZED HEREIN SHALL NOT INCLUDE ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCTS, NOR ATTORNEY LEGAL ANALYSES.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 11
THE COURT'S RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 10 IS HEREBY INCORPORATED AND SET OUT AS ITS RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 11.
SO ORDERED:
ARTHUR L. SPADA, JUDGE