of arid prop- erty or the aggrsgato CppOuntof the judgments againat tho property In arid suit, whlohover la lower, . . . You~falled to advias 1111 am to whetherthe Court hoard ovideno0 apcm tho roaaoimblofairraluo 0r tho prop- I .
Hon. Yexvell Welch, Page 3 (v-890 1
arty and lm3orporatai3 in the judgmant~a finding 0r tho reaaonablo fair value thoroof. Ii tho Oourt ocmplled with the prorLslons of said Liootlon5 aad the nadjudgod value" is in the amount of $1800.00 or loam, then the sale ~paaaodtitle to the pwheaor. In that ovont, if the tm aaaoaaor-o&.ootor rofuaoa to woa3Qt tho #MOO lean the oourt aoata, ho oould k required to aqospt such amowt qxd ia##uejwope# redWQtiion *aue%pta by a mandamus ault. The Oourt in a tax roreuloauremolt la not requ&md to owply with the provlaloua of said motion 5 aa to "adjudgedvalue' unlearnreqn4ated by the tax- ayar. Barson v. Oltr of Bllrsi-ton,138 S.W.2d 921 PTox. Civ. App., 1940, error dlam~.judge. oo~.) dsaumiPy that an "edjpdgod value" wee not r0uadand inoorp8Slad la the judgment,oc that +i,an "adjudgedvalw wan fouad and the amount Mimeor ox- ooodml the mum of #1800.00, you aro advlaed that tho aelo wad void and t&a deed did nob paaa tit10 ,totho QUl'OhWOF. Ia m* evetS& a*hnnlng Wet the jwlgmemt la valid, you *I$!# h8v6 an ord*r of ma&e faawd Sti Qr00ead ',!%a geli l$M pr&&y Mum, am provldod bp.+&&h mm;: r,c.q.
lo. O-738, whloh holda that.8 bid by a prlvato pemon for leas than tho amount of the jud nt la void. See D.aadlaorv. Stats, 140 Tax. 252, 1r 3.W.26 914 (1942). Uhoro the edjudgod value la loam than tho clplount of the jud$mont, and tho Q!xrohaaerblda an amouut at leant equal to the adjudged value and 1088 than tho full 88ouBt of the jrdlmont, th@ proaoeda shell bo dlatrlbutad to all taxlug unit8 whloh are pertLea to tho suit rhloh by the judgment in maid suit found to have tax 1100s against.awh QrOQ- have beetsi arty, pro rata and in proportionto tho emoanta o? lion.Maxwell Welch, Page 4 (v-890)
their respeotlvetax lleds as eatabllahod~lnmaid judgment as provided in Se&ion 8 of Artlole 734%
A sale 0r Ql'OQ0l'ty for taxes to anyQIurty other than a texlng unit whloh is a party to the suit, ~forless than the amount of the adjudged value (If any) of said property, or the eggm- gate amount of the judgments against the Qrop- ertv. whiahever Is lover. Is void. and the doed passes no title to the purohaser.-8; c).Opinion BO. o-738. See Danolmr v. State, 140 Tex. 252, 166 S.W.26 914 (f942). Where the adjudgedveluo ia loam than the amount or the judgment, and the puroheaer bids an amormt et loeat equal to the adjud ed valua end leas ,thenthe ra amount 0r tho !I udgmont, the proaeedashall be diatrlbutodto all taxing' unlta whloh nre partleatotho aultuhlchby the judgment in said ault have ken found to have tar llelrsagainst auoh property,Qro.rrt8 and in proportion to tho amoun$aof tholz~~apeo- tlvo tax liens aa