EXCEPT IN ITALY FOR A LIMITED NUMBER OF PRODUCTS ; WHEREAS IN CONSEQUENCE THE AFOREMENTIONED PROVISIONS SHOULD BE AMENDED BY LAYING DOWN THAT A STATE OF SERIOUS CRISIS SHOULD BE RECORDED ONLY AT THE REQUEST OF THE MEMBER STATE CONCERNED ;
WHEREAS ARTICLE 21 ( 1 ) OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1035/72 DETERMINES THE USES AND PURPOSES OF PRODUCTS WITHDRAWN FROM THE MARKET ; WHEREAS IN CERTAIN CASES THESE DIFFERENT USES HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE INSUFFICIENT TO ENSURE DISPOSAL OF THE SAID PRODUCTS ; WHEREAS IT IS THEREFORE ADVISABLE TO LAY DOWN IN ADDITION IN CERTAIN CASES THAT THESE PRODUCTS MAY BE USED AFTER PROCESSING BY DISTRIBUTING THEM TO SCHOOLS ;
WHEREAS EXPERIENCE HAS SHOWN THAT THE CRITERIA FOR FIXING REFERENCE PRICES LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 23 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1035/72 ARE TOO RIGID TO ENABLE THESE PRICES TO BE FIXED AT LEVELS THAT ENSURE PROTECTION OF COMMUNITY PRODUCTS WITHOUT HARMING THE INTERESTS OF CONSUMERS ; WHEREAS IN ORDER TO OFFSET THIS DISADVANTAGE THESE CRITERIA SHOULD THEREFORE BE AMENDED ;
WHEREAS ARTICLE 24 ( 3 ) OF THE AFOREMENTIONED REGULATION LAYS DOWN THAT , FOR CALCULATING THE ENTRY PRICE , THE COST OF TRANSPORTING PRODUCTS FROM THE FRONTIER CROSSING POINT TO THE REPRESENTATIVE IMPORT MARKETS SHALL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE PRICES ; WHEREAS , AS A RESULT OF THIS SYSTEM WHICH HAS LED IN PARTICULAR TO THE APPLICATION OF FORFEITS TO AVOID DISCRIMINATIONS BASED ON THE DIFFERENT MEANS OF TRANSPORT , COMMUNITY PRODUCTS HAVE BEEN AT A DISADVANTAGE ON CERTAIN MARKETS IN RELATION TO IMPORTED PRODUCTS ; WHEREAS IN ORDER TO ELIMINATE THIS DISADVANTAGE CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN , WHEN FIXING THE REFERENCE PRICE , TO THE COST OF TRANSPORTING COMMUNITY PRODUCTS BETWEEN PRODUCTION AREAS AND THE LARGE CONSUMPTION CENTRES ; WHEREAS , IN VIEW OF THE SPECIAL MEASURES TAKEN TO ENSURE OUTLETS FOR COMMUNITY PRODUCTION OF ORANGES , MANDARINS , SATSUMAS , CLEMENTINES , TANGERINES AND OTHER SIMILAR CITRUS HYBRIDS , TRANSPORT COSTS SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHEN CALCULATING THE REFERENCE PRICE FOR THESE PRODUCTS ;
WHEREAS ARTICLE 24 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1035/72 LAYS DOWN THE CRITERIA FOR CALCULATING THE ENTRY PRICE OF IMPORTED PRODUCTS ; WHEREAS EXPERIENCE HAS SHOWN THAT THE RECORDED RATES DO NOT ALWAYS GIVE A TRUE PICTURE OF THE MARKET SITUATION BECAUSE THEY SOMETIMES REFER TO A SMALL PROPORTION OF THE GOODS PLACED ON THE MARKET ; WHEREAS THE NATURE OF THE PRICES AND THE QUANTITIES OF THE PRODUCTS TO BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN CALCULATING THE ENTRY PRICE SHOULD HENCEFORTH BE SPECIFIED ;
WHEREAS , FOR CERTAIN PRODUCTS WHICH ARE PARTICULARLY SENSITIVE TO MARKET FLUCTUATIONS , AND WHERE IN PARTICULAR THE PRICES RECORDED ON THE REPRESENTATIVE IMPORT MARKETS REFER TO QUANTITIES WHICH ARE NEGLIGIBLE IN RELATION TO TOTAL IMPORTS WHEN THE COMMUNITY MARKET IS CHARACTERISED BY FALLING PRICES FOR COMMUNITY PRODUCTS , THE LATTER PRICES SHOULD BE USED FOR CALCULATING THE ENTRY PRICE ;
WHEREAS , WHERE SIGNIFICANT QUANTITIES OF CERTAIN PRODUCTS ARE