POLICE REPORT
FILED CAUSING A LOSS IN A MARTIAL ASSET AND DID NOT NOTIFY THE POLICE BUT THE MISTRESS WAS SENDING TEXT TO APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO FOR TITTLE APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO NEVER HANDED THE MISTRESS THE TITTLE WHO WAS PRETENIDING TO BE APPELLEE MANUEL CASTRO THE 99 COUNTOUR WAS SOLD TO PAY FOR THE MISTRESS
DIVORCE APPELLLEE MANUEL CASTRO AIDED HER IN STEALING FROM APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO. KEOGH PLAN PENSION APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO DID NOT GIVE UP HER RIGHT TO THIS ASSET THAT WAS HIDDEN FROM HER ITS NOT EVEN IN THE AGREEMENT FOR FINAL DIVORCE APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO WANTS HER SHARE SHE IS ENTITLED TO.
Q) DEBTS THAT OCCURRED WITHIN THE MARRIAGE OF MANUEL AND MARYANN CASTRO APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO PRAYS FOR THE COURT TO GRANT HER 1500 ALIMONY THE SUPPORT THAT IS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN A COST OF LIVING APPELLANT IS DISABLED AND BECAME DISABLED WITHIN THE MARRIAGE OF MANUEL AND MARYANN CASTRO 29 YEARS AND PREJUDICE WAS BROUGHT UPON HER DISABILITY RIGHTS AS A DISABLED SPOUSE IN A MARRIAGE THAT EXCEEDED IN OVER 10 YEARS AND ENDED DUE TO APPELLEE MANUEL CASTRO CARRYING AN EXTRA MARTIAL AFFAIRWITH 3rd PARTY NON SPOUSE MISTRESS CHRISTINA PACHECO LISTED IN THIS LAWSUITE IN THE AGREEMENT FOR FINAL DIVORCE APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO SOCIAL SECURITY HAS DROPPED TO DUE THE NONSUPPORT OF APPELLEE MANUEL CASTRO WHERE SHE HAS BEEN THE ONLY ONE SUPPORTING THE MARTIAL HOME PREVENTING FORECLOSURE FROM THE BANK AND THE ATACOSA TAX OFFICE BY FUNDING THE EXPENSE THAT APPELLEE MANUEL CASTRO IGNORES AND REFUSES TO PAY AND SUPPORT A DEBT THAT WAS CAUSED BY HIS DISHONESTY IN THE AGREEMENT FOR FINAL DIVORCE SIGNED OCT 30, 2013. BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY BY FRAUD SEPT 1, 2011 THE TEXAS LEGISLATURE ADDED7.009 TO THE TEXAS FAMILY CODE WHICH MANDATES COURTS TO RECONSTITUTE THE COMMUNITY ESTATE UPON FINDING FRAUD. IN ADDITION, ACTS BY EITHER SPOUSE RESULTING IN EXCESSIVE OR ABNORMAL EXPENDITURES,DESTRUCTION, CONCEALMENT,OR FRAUDULENT DISPOSITION OF COMMUNITY PROPERTY, JONT TENANCY, OR OTHER PROPERTY HELD IN COMMON IS A FACTOR FOR A COURT TO CONSIDER IN AWARDING SPOUSAL MAINTENCE. WHAT CONSTITUTES FRAUD A. SPRICK V. SPRICK ,25 S.W. 3D 7(TEX.APP-EL PASO 1999,PET.DENIED)COMMUNITY FUNDS EXPENDED ON PARAMOURS MATERIAL THAT WAS MISREPRESENTED ACTUAL FRAUD STONEV. LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORP., 554 S.W.2D 183,185(TEX 1977) A BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY IS FREQUENTLY TERMED AS FRAUD ON THE COMMUNITY IN RE MARRIAGE OF MOORE, 890 S.E.2D 821,827(TEX.APP-AMARILLO 1994,NO WRIT) CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD INCLUDES ACTIONS OF ONE SPOUSE UNFAIRLY DISPOSING OF OR ENCUMBERING THE OTHER SPOUSE INTEREST IN COMMUNITY PROPERTY OR UNFAIRLY
INCURRING COMMUNITY INDEBTNESS WITHOUT THE OTHER SPOUSES KNOWLEDGE OR CONCENT. MASSEY V.MASSEY,807 S.W. 2D391,402(TEX.APP-HOUSTON[1ST DISTRICT]1991)WRIT DENIED,867 S.W. 2D 766(TEX.1993)CONFIDENCES THAT EXIST AS A RESULT OF THE MARRIAGE.ID.AT 827.
THE FOLLOWING DEBTS OCCURRED IN THE MARRIAGE OF MANUEL AND MARYANN CASTRO MORTGAGE UNPAID ARREARS SEE BSI STATEMENT- SEE STATEMENT
APPELLEE MANUEL CASTRO OWES THE DEBT AND CAUSED THE DEBT TO EXCEED DUE TO HIS DISHONESTY. TAXES
95 FLEETWOOD 2013,378.81 2014 355.90 SEE STATEMENT "1501OLIVE MARTIALHOME BALANCE FOR 2013-$725 SEE STATEMENT APPELLANT MARYANN-