stated that he
feared B.A. and feared for his physical safety with B.A. in the home. Id. at 19-20, 31.
Prior to a fact-finding hearing, C.A. notified the juvenile court that he intended to
argue that B.A. should be found to be a CHINS under Indiana Code section 31-34-1-6
because he was danger to himself or others, and not under Indiana Code section 31-34-1-1 as
alleged by DCS. B.A. was appointed a public defender. The fact finding hearing was held
on February 6, 2012, at the conclusion of which, the juvenile court found B.A. to be a
CHINS, but took under advisement whether he was a CHINS under Indiana Code section 31-
34-1-1 or section 31-34-1-6. On February 9, 2012, the juvenile court issued its order finding
B.A. to be a CHINS under Indiana Code section 31-34-1-1. The order stated in pertinent
part:
4. DCS filed the CHINS petition under I.C. 31-34-1-1 alleging that the child's physical or mental condition is seriously impaired or seriously endangered as a result of the inability, refusal, or neglect of the child's parent, guardian, or custodian to supply the child with necessary food, clothing, shelter, medical care, education, or supervision.
5. [C.A.] concedes that [B.A.] is a [CHINS] but alleges that he is a [CHINS] under I.C. 31-34-1-6 because [B.A.] substantially endangers his own health or the health of another individual.
6. [C.A.] adopted [B.A.] when he was 8 or 9 and stated that [B.A.'s] behavioral issues began approximately 3 years ago. He states [B.A.] was hoarding food and trash in his room, and that his room was always messy. He described an incident where [B.A.] swung at him although he did not hit him. There were behavioral issues at all of the schools that [B.A.] attended in IPS, Carmel, and Washington Township. On at least one occasion [B.A.] threatened to kill himself or [C.A.].
....
8. [B.A.] was in residential care at Resource when his government assistance expired. It was at that time that [C.A.] was approached to take [B.A.] into his home.
9. When he refused to take [B.A.] back into his home, the CHINS petition was filed. After the filing of the CHINS petition, [C.A.] no longer participated in [B.A.'s] therapy and no longer went to visit [B.A.]. [C.A.] claims that no one asked him to participate in [B.A.'s] therapy, but by his own admission, he did not ask to be involved in [B.A.'s] therapy either. Nor has he been to visit [B.A.] since the CHINS was filed.
10. [B.A.] is presently at Youth Opportunity Center in residential care in Muncie, Indiana. The length of time that [B.A.] needs to stay in
residential care is dependent on how long it takes him to reach his goals. [B.A.] does not wish to return to the care of [C.A.].
11. [B.A.] has mental health and behavioral issues and is therefore presently in residential care. By not participating in [B.A.'s] therapy, [C.A.] has shown an inability or refusal to provide for [B.A.]. [C.A.] has