OF THE UNDERTAKINGS THEMSELVES WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO THE HIGH AUTHORITY'S ADMINISTRATION . IN ANY CASE THE APPLICANTS HAVE NOT SPECIFICALLY DEMONSTRATED THAT THERE HAVE BEEN INEXCUSABLE MISTAKES .
THE FOREGOING CONSIDERATIONS TAKEN AS A WHOLE, LEAD TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THE APPLICANTS HAVE NOT PROVED THE EXISTENCE OF A WRONGFUL ACT OR OMISSION .
IV - WHETHER THE ACTIONS ARE TIME-BARRED AND WHETHER THE INJURY HAD THE NATURE OF SPECIAL DAMAGE
SINCE THE APPLICATIONS HAVE TO BE DISMISSED AS UNFOUNDED ON THE GROUNDS THAT THERE IS NO WRONGFUL ACT OR OMISSION AND ALSO THAT NO INJURY HAS BEEN SUFFERED THERE IS NO NEED TO RULE ON THE QUESTION WHETHER THE CLAIMS MADE BY THE APPLICANTS ARE IN PART TIME-BARRED .
FOR THE LIKE REASONS THERE IS NO NEED IN THESE CASES TO RULE WHETHER UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE TREATY THE DAMAGE IN RESPECT OF WHICH REPARATION IS CLAIMED MUST BE IN THE NATURE OF SPECIAL DAMAGE AND WHETHER THIS CONDITION IS SATISFIED .
Decision on costs
UNDER ARTICLE 69 ( 2 ) OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE THE UNSUCCESSFUL PARTY SHALL BE ORDERED TO PAY THE COSTS . THE APPLICANTS HAVE FAILED IN ALL THEIR SUBMISSIONS AND MUST THEREFORE BEAR THE COSTS .
Operative part
THE COURT
HEREBY :
1 . DISMISSES THE APPLICATIONS
2 . ORDERS THE APPLICANTS TO PAY THE COSTS .