I'FTFRSON IN PROI3X1' COURT NO. 1 : TONYA PLTFRSON ti Individually and as Next Friend of RLRY PLIERSON: DON I PHIRSON; CAROL PFTNRSON, Individually and as Next Friend of RUBY PLTNRSONi and LONNY PETERSON. ss
VS.
SII,Vh.RADO INC'. SIIA'FRADO SFINIM - SH(iAR LANE) HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
MODIFIED ORDER GRANTING SILVERADO'S FIRST A.MENDED PLEA TO THE JURISDICTION
BF: IT RLMEMI3FRFD that on this day came on to he considered Defendant, Silverado
Senior Living. Inc. d/h/a Silverado Senior living Sugar Land's First Amended Plea to the
Jurisdiction and the Court after reviewing such motion together with supplementation and any
response thereto is of the opinion that this Motion is well taken should he in all things GRANTED.
It is I IlIZI'113Y OR DI 4WD, AD.IliDGED and DFCRITD that PI _A INTIFFS Carol Peterson
and Tonya Peterson do not have standing to hying claims on bchallof Rt !BY printsoN as next
friends or otherwise. The sole persons with standing to bring claims on behalf of RI. In
PliTRSON are David Peterson. Carol Manley and/or her Court appointed ad /items.
All relief not expressly granted herein is denied.
SIGMA this /4 day of tr,LL 2015.
.1 .11)(.iE I F.SIDING
-1819-47(4.03'A TAB 6
Order granting Silverado's 91a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' breach of trust and/or breach of fiduciary duty in Cause No. 427,208 and/or No. 427,208-401, signed on January 9, 2015 ('Al !Sr NO. 427,208
mAcxr.Y ("mA('K -) cd.rN IN PROIIATI 2 C( R I NO. I PHERSON: TONYA PI' Individuallv and as Next Friend of MIRY PHERSON. DON LES! II'. PI: IERSON1 CAROL PL. ERSON, Individually and as Next Friend of RUBY PHERSON: and LONNY PLTLRSON.
VS
tilt VLRADO SENIOR LIVING, INC. c.1.11;a SIIATRADO SUNIOR I IVIN(i St (iAR LAND 'NTY. I l'NAS
ORDER GRANTING SILVERADO'S 91a MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' BREACH OF TRUST AND/OR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY
81, H Rrhir,IV1BERLD that on this day came on to be considered pcie ndain. Silverado
Senior I.iving. Inc. d/hla Silverado Senior I 11 (.1 Sugar band's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to
I RCP Rule 9 I a and the Court iliter reviewing such motion. supplement and any response thereto is
of the opinion that this Motion is well taken should be in all things GRANTED.
PLAINTIFI S' claim For breach of trust andior breach of Fiduciary duty is hereby
DISNIISSFiD WITH PRI.JI. Din Iverado Senior I Hying. Inc. dfbia Silverado Senior Living
Sugar Land.
IT IS Ft RH IrR 01ZDF;RED, that Silverado Senior I ,ikint.t. Inc. d/b/a Sil erado Senior
Living • Sugar ,and be awarded its costs and attorneys' lees in the amount oi $2.692.50.
IT IS Ft OR.Dr.R11), that Silverado Senior Living. Inc. d/h/a Silverado Senior
I .iving Sugar Land be awarded its costs and attorney s' lees in the amount. of $750 in the event
Plaintiffs' file a motion to reconsider. SI 0.000.00 in the ev cut ol'appeal. $7,500.00 if plan-nal-des a
Writ of Error or Petition lir Review wnh the Supreme Court of Texas. and $7.500.00 ilthe Writ of
Error