HEREIN
AS WELL AS IN OTHER DOCUMENTS I (WE) HAVE SETTLED WITH THE BANK
- continues on page 6 -
Page: 5
Continuation of the BALLOT FOR INDUSTRIAL CREDIT n. 40/00443-0, issued on this
date by IRGOVEL IND RIOG DE OLEOS VEGETAIS LTDA, in favor of the Bank of Brazil
S.A., in the value of R$6.676.012,98, with final payment due on 15/12/2021.
OF BRAZIL S.A., AND DEMAND THR TOTAL VALUE OF THE RESULTING DEBT, NEVERTHELESS
EXTRAJUDICIAL NOTICE OR JUDICIAL INTERVENTION. THE BANK OF BRAZIL S.A. MAY ALSO
CONSIDER FULLY DUE AND DEMANDABLE THE RESULTING DEBT FROM THE EXISTING
OPERATIONS WHEN EITHER TO ME, TO US OR TO OBLIGOR(S) ANY OF THE FOLLOWING
SITUATIONS IS ATTRIBUTED:
A) SUFFER EXCHANGE PROTEST, REQUIRE EXTRAJUDICIAL,
JUDICIAL RECUPERATION OR BANKRUPTCY OR IF WE HAVE REQUIRED BANKRUPTCY OR CIVIL
INSOLVENCY OR IF FOR ANY REASON WE END OUR ACTIVITIES; B) SUFFER JUDICIAL ACTION
OR TAX PROCEDURE WHICH MAY PUT AT RISK THE CONSTITUTED GUARANTEES OR THE
FULFILLMENT OF THE DEEDS ASSUMED HEREIN; C) DIRECTLY OR THROUGH EMPLOYEES OR
AGENTS, I (WE) PROVIDE INCOMPLETE OR CHANGED INFORMATION TO THE BANK OF BRAZIL
S.A., INCLUDING THROUGH PUBLIC OR PRIVATE DOCUMENT OF ANY NATURE;
D) DIRECTLY
OR THROUGH ANY EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS, WE DO NOT PROVIDE INFORMATION THAT, IF KNOWN
BY THE BANK OF BRAZIL S.A., COULD CHANGE THEIR JUDGEMENTS OR EVALUATIONS; E) I
(WE) BECOME DEFAULTER IN OTHER OPERATIONS DONE WITH THE BANK OF BRAZIL S.A.;
F)I(WE) EXCEED THE GRANTED CREDIT LIMIT; G) I (WE) DEVIATE, FULLY OR PARTIALLY,
THE GOODS GIVEN AS A GUARANTEE; H) I (WE) DO NOT KEEP UP TO DATE THE INSURANCE
OF THE GOODS GIVEN AS GUARANTEE; I) I (WE) DO NOT REINFORCE, IN THE TERM AS
INDICATED BY ANY COMMUNICATION GIVEN TO ME (US) BY THE BANK OF BRAZIL S.A., THE
CONSTITUTED GUARANTEE(S).
SINGLE PARAGRAPH - I (WE) ARE AWARE THAT WITHOUT LIMITING THE ASSUMPTIONS
REFERRED TO IN ARTICLES 39 AND 40 OF THE "PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO THE BNDES
AGREEMENTS", THERE WILL ALSO BE AN EARLY TERM DATE OF THE PRESENT INSTRUMENT,
WITH DEBT LIABILITY AND IMMEDIATE RESTRAINING OF ANY DISBURSEMENT, IN THE
FOLLOWING HYPOTHESIS: A) NO PHYSICAL AND/OR FINANCIAL EVIDENCE OF THE
DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT WHICH JUSTIFIES THE FINANCIAL COLLABORATION; B)
APPLICATION OF THE GRANTED FUNDS IN A PURPOSE WHICH DIFFERS FROM THE INSTRUMENT
PURSUING THE TRANSACTION; C) EXISTENCE OF FINAL SANCTIONING ADMINISTRATIVE
DECISION, RENDERED BY A COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR OFFICE, DUE TO PRACTICE OF ACTS,
BY ME (US) OR MY (OUR)MANAGERS, WHO MIGHT RESULT IN RACE OR GENDER
DISCRIMINATION, CHILD LABOR AND SLAVE LABOR,
AND/OR ESTOPPEL BY JUDGMENT, PRONOUNCED AS A RESULT OF THE ACTS, OR ALSO, OF
OTHERS THAT MAY CHARACTERIZE SEXUAL OR MORAL HARASSMENT, OR THAT RESULT IN A
CRIME AGAINST THE ENVIRONMENT, EXCEPT IF PROVED THAT THE IMPOSED REPAIR WAS
FULLY FULFILLED OR WHILE BEING FULFILLED THE PENALTY TO BE IMPOSED TO US AS LONG
AS IT OBSERVES THE RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS;
- continues on page 7 -
Page: 6
Continuation of