to everyone by claiming animosity. Id., at
1161, quoting Commonwealth ex rel. 'Williams v. Miller, 385 A.2d 992, 995 (Pa.Super,
1978). The opinion and conclusion of the appellate court present a compelling standard for
implementing Pennsylvania's statutory requirements governing the custody rights of
grandparents, particularly where the parent is deceased.
Conclusion
The evidence presented to .the custody master supports the conclusion of this court that
Paternal Grandfather is entitled to an award of partial physical custody of his grandchild,
notwithstanding Mother's objection, and that it would be in the best interest of the child.
Hence, the record supports affinnance of the trial court's decision.
BY THE COURT:
DATE: March 20, 2019 o,-,rx MOTHER Is REPRESENTATIONS IN HER PROPOSED CUSTODY SCHEDULE''ARE' THAT THE CHILD MUST REMAIN REGISTERED FULLTIME AT THE DAYCARE BUT MO;HER ·· IS ENTITLED TO ENROLL THE CHILD IN A FACILITY SHE DEEMS APPROPRIATE.
6. GRANDFATHER SHALL HAVE CUSTODY ON FATHER'S DAY FROM 10:00 A.M. TO 5:00 P.M. GRANDFATHER TO PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION FROM AND TO MOTHER'S RESIDENCE.
7. AT CHRISTMAS, GRANDFATHER SHALL HAVE CUSTODY FROM 6:00 P.M. CHRISTMAS EVE TO 6:00 P.M. CHRISTMAS DAY. SINCE