AS SUNRISE, TELENOR MOBIL A.S., AND TOTAL ACCESS COMMUNICATION PLC, ALSO KNOWN ASDTAC, Defendants-Appellees, AND SONAECOM-SERVICOS DE COMUNICACOES, S.A., Defendant-Appellee, AND TELECOM ITALIA S.PA., TELECOM PERSONAL S.A., TIM CELULAR S.A., AND TIM PARTICIPACOES S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS TIM BRAZIL, Defendants-Appellees, AND TRUE MOVE COMPANY LIMITED, Defendant-Appellee, AND WIND HELLAS TELECOMMUNICATIONS S.A. AND WIND TELECOMUNICAZIONI SPA, Defendants-Appellees, AND AVEA ILETISIM HIZMETLERI A.S., Defendant-Appellee, AND TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 6 T-MOBILE USA, INC., Defendant-Appellee, AND AT&T MOBILITY LLC, Defendant-Appellee, AND TELE-MOBILE COMPANY, ALSO KNOWN AS TELUS MOBILITY, Defendant-Appellee, AND ROGERS WIRELESS PARTNERSHIP, Defendant-Appellee, AND MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, AND PALM, INC., Defendant-Appellee, AND CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, DOING BUSINESS AS VERIZON WIRELESS, Defendant-Appellee, AND HELlO, LLC AND SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees, AND LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC., Defendant-Appellee, AND 7 TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE MOTOROLA, INC., NOW KNOWN AS MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee, AND
IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED, Defendant-Appellee, AND
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG, MOBILE ONE LTD., ORANGE LIMITED, ORANGE NEDERLAND N.V., TURK CELL ILETISIM HIZMETLERI A.S., AND UPSIDE WIRELESS INC., ALSO KNOWN AS IPIPI, Defendants, AND
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., Intervenor.
2011-1581
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland in case no. 07-CV-3012, Judge Alex- ander Williams, Jr.
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. T-MOBILE (UK) LTD., T-MOBILE AUSTRIA GMBH, T-MOBILE CZECH REPUBLIC A.S., T-MOBILE DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, T-MOBILE HUNGARY CO. LTD., T-MOBILE NETHERLANDS B.V., AND T- MOBILE SLOVENSKO A.S., Defendants, TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 8 AND
ADVANCED INFO SERVICE PLC, ALSO KNOWN AS AIS, BELL MOBILITY INC., CSL NEW WORLD MOBILITY LIMITED, CHINA MOBILE PEOPLES TELEPHONE COMPANY LIMITED, NOW KNOWN AS CHINA MOBILE HONG KONG COMPANY LIMITED, KT FREETEL CO. LTD., NOW KNOWN AS KT CORPORATION, SINGAPORE TELECOM MOBILE PRIVATE LIMITED, SINGAPORE TELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED, ALSO KNOWN AS SINGTEL, SINGTEL OPTUS PTY LIMITED, STARHUB MOBILE PTE LTD., AND TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED, Defendants, AND
AMERICA MOVIL, S.A.B. DE C.V., CLARO, S.A., AMX ARGENTINA, S.A., AND RADIOMOVIL DIPSA, S.A. DE C.V., ALSO KNOWN AS TELCEL, Defendants, AND
BELGACOM MOBILE S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS PROXIMUS, MOBILKOM AUSTRIA AG, SFR, ALSO KNOWN AS SOCIETE FRANCAISE DE RADIOTELEPHONE S.A., SMARTONE MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED, TANGO S.A., VODAFONE CZECH REPUBLIC A.S., VODAFONE D2 GMBH, ALSO KNOWN AS VODAFONE GERMANY, VODAFONE ESPANA S.A., VODAFONE ESSAR LTD., VODAFONE HUNGARY MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD., VODAFONE IRELAND LTD., VODAFONE LIBERTEL B.V., VODAFONE LIMITED, ALSO KNOWN AS VODAFONE UK, VODAFONE NETWORK PTY. LTD., VODAFONE NEW ZEALAND, VODAFONE OMNITEL N.V., VODAFONE PORTUGAL, 9 TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE
COMUNICACOES PESSOAIS, S.A., VODAFONE TELEKOMUNIKASYON A.S., ALSO KNOWN AS VODAFONE TURKEY, AND VODAFONE-PANAFON HELLENIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS VODAFONE-PANAFON S.A., Defendants, AND
TNL PCS S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS 01, Defendant, AND
BASE N.V.lS.A., E-PLUS MOBILFUNK GMBH & CO. KG, AND KPN B.V., Defendants, AND
BERMUDA DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS LTD., Defendant, AND
BOUYGUES TELECOM S.A., Defendant, AND
CHUNGHWATELECOM CO. LTD., FAR EASTONE TELCOMMUNICATIONS CO. LTD., AND TAIWAN MOBILE CO., LTD., Defendants, AND
CLICKATELL (PTY) LTD., Defendant, AND
FRANCE TELECOM ESPANA S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS ORANGE SPAIN, FRANCE TELECOM S.A., MOBISTAR N.V., ORANGE AUSTRIA TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 10
TELECOMMUNICATION GMBH, FORMERLY