CASTRO AND COUNSEL JOSEPH APPELT AND 3rd PARTY NON SPOUSE MISTRESS CHRISTINA PACHECO. THAT IS WHY APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO HAS THIS CASE IN APPEALS COURT FOR THE TRUTH TO BE HEARD PRESENTED AND RULED WITH A JUST AND RIGHT DIVORCE DECREE NOT THE FRAUD CONSPIRACY HIDING MARTIAL ASSETS TAMPERING WITH THE AGREEMENT FOR FINAL DIVORCE THAT WAS COVERED UP ON OCT 30, 2013 COUNSEL JOSEPH APPELT ENFORCED THE AGREEMENT KNOWING APPELLANT MARYANN
CASTRO WAS CHALLENGING THE AGREEMENT HE TAMPERED WITH AND JUDGE BARBRA NELLERMOC KNEW APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO WAS IN COURT TO SPEAK ON HER RIGHT
TO PROTECT HER INTEREST AND LIFE IN THE AGREEMENT FOR FINAL DIVORCE ALLOWED PREJUDICE ONLY LISTENED TO COUNSEL JOSEPH APPELT WHO IS KNOWN FOR NOT ABIDING BY THE LAW DID HE NOT RUN FOR JUDGE AND TAMPERED WITH HIS OPPENTS SIGNES WITH HIS DAUGHTER CAUGHT ON VIDEO COUNSEL JOSEPH APPELT TAMPERED WITH THE LIFE OF APPLELLANT MARYANN CASTRO BY SPEAKING TO JUDGE PRIOR TO COURT BEING DISHONEST
THORUGHOUT THE WHOLE PROCESS OF DIVORCE IN THE MARRIAGE OF MANUEL AND MARYANN CASTRO AND THE AGREEMENT FOR FINAL DIVORCE ON OCT 30,2013 HOW IS THAT FAIR FOR APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO AND COUNSEL SARAH LISHMAN SPEAKING TO JUDGES PRIOR TO COURT APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO HEARD COUNSEL JOSEPH APPELLT TELL SARAH LISHMAN HE HAD SPOKEN TO JUDGE SAUNAS PRIOR TO COURT
COUNSEL JOSEPH APPELTWAS ABUSING THE JUDICAL SYSTEM INSTEAD OF ACTING LIKE A
PROFESSIONAL OFFICER OF THE COURT HE WAS CONDUCTING HIMSELF IN MISCONDUCT BY
CONSPIRING IN FRAUD OVERVALUED COMMUNITY 125,000 FOR HIS CLIENT WITH REALTORS OPINION LEGAL MALPRACTICE PROCESS A DIVORCE IN ACTIVE BANKRUPTCY KNOWING HIS CLIENT HAVE NOT GOTTEN APPROVAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT HAD THE COMMUNITY 1501 OLIVE UNDER BANKRUPTCY CLIENT OWED AND HAD NOT MADE THE MORTGAGE PAYMENTS HIDING MARTIAL ASSETS KEOGH PLAN PENSION AND 99 SUBARU AND 95
FLEETWOOD DOUBLEWIDE HE KEPT ATTACKING APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO IN COURT
WHEN HIS CLIENT APPELLEE MANUEL CASTRO WAS COMMITING ADULTERY,FRAUD, TO HARM APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO.AND THAT IS WHY APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO IS CONTESTING THE AGREEMENT FOR FINAL DIVORCE AND THAT IS WHY IT SHOULD BE
MODIFIED APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO WAS HARMED.
H) HIDING MARTIAL ASSETS A KEOGH PLAN PENSION 99 SUBARU AND THE 95 FLEETWOOD THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS WITHHELD FROM APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO SHE
DID NOT GIVE UP HER RIGHTS TO THESE MARTIAL ASSETS. IJAPPELLEE MANUEL CASTRO COUNSEL JOSEPH APPELT SUBMITTED A MOTION TO JUDGE LITTLEJOHN THESE ASSETS WERE HIDDEN FROM APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO AND SHE
WANTS HER RIGHT TO THE KEOGH PLAN PENSION AND THE 99 SUBARU.
J) THE 95 FLEETWOOD DOUBLEWIDE MOBILE HOME APPELLEE MANUEL CASTRO MISTRESS CHRISTINA PACHECO WERE COMMITING FRAUD WITH THIS ASSET THAT WAS IN THE MARRIAGE OF MANUEL CASTRO AND MARYANN CASTRO SENT TEXT TO APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO SAYING THE MOBILE HOME WAS SOLD TO THE HERNANDEZ FOR 7000 BY GREENTREE AND THAT THERE WAS ATITTLE TRANSFER NO PAPER WORK . SEE TEXT THccf" LaJ frS? -Jc I kJU K) APPELLEE MANUEL CASTRO SURRENERED HIS INTEREST ITS LISTED AS EXEMPTED