KNOWN AS ONE GMBH, ORANGE COMMUNICATIONS S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS ORANGE SWITZERLAND, ORANGE FRANCE S.A., ORANGE PLC, ALSO KNOWN AS ORANGE U.K., ORANGE S.A., ORANGE SLOVENSKO A.S., AND VOX MOBILE S.A., Defendants, AND H3G S.P.A., ALSO KNOWN AS 3ITALIA, HUTCHISON 3G AUSTRIA GMBH, HUTCHISON 3G UK LIMITED, AND HUTCHISON TELECOMMUNICATIONS (HONG KONG) LIMITED, Defendants, AND KDDI CORPORATION, Defendant, AND PCCW MOBILE HK LIMITED, Defendant, AND YAHOO! INC., Defendant, AND KABUSHIKI KAISHA NTT DOCOMO AND SOFTBANK MOBILE CORP., Defendants, AND M3 WIRELESS LTD., Defendant, 11 TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBlLE
AND NETCOM AS, NOW KNOWN AS TELIASONERA NORGE AS AND TELIA DANMARK AlS, Defendants, AND TMN-TELECOMUNICACOES MOVEIS NACIONAIS, S.A., Defendant, AND 02 (GERMANY) GMBH & CO. OHG, 02 (UK) LIMITED, 02 COMMUNICATIONS (IRELAND) LTD., PEGASO PCS, S.A. DE C.V., TELEFONICA MOVILES ARGENTINA, S.A., TELEFONICA MOVILES ESPANA, S.A.U., TELEFONICA MOVILES MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V., TELEFONICA 02 CZECH REPUBLIC, A.S., TELEFONICA 02 EURQPE PLC, ALSO KNOWN AS 02 PLC, TELEFONICA, S.A., VIVO PARTICIPACOES, S.A., AND VIVO, S.A., Defendants, AND PANNON GSM TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD., SONOFON AlS, SWISSCOM MOBILE A.G., TDC AlS, TDC SWITZERLAND AG, ALSO KNOWN AS SUNRISE, TELENOR MOBIL A.S., AND TOTAL ACCESS COMMUNICATION PLC, ALSO KNOWN ASDTAC, Defendants, AND SONAECOM-SERVICOS DE COMUNICACOES, S.A., Defendant, AND TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBlLE 12 TELECOM ITALIA S.PA., TELECOM PERSONAL S.A., TIM CELULAR S.A., AND TIM PARTICIPACOES S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS TIM BRAZIL, Defendants, AND TRUE MOVE COMPANY LIMITED, Defendant, AND WIND HELLAS TELECOMMUNICATIONS S.A. AND WIND TELECOMUNICAZIONI SPA, Defendants, AND AVEA ILETISIM HIZMETLERI A.S., Defendant, AND T-MOBILE USA, INC., Defendant-Appellant, AND AT&T MOBILITY LLC, Defendant-Appellant, AND TELE-MOBILE COMPANY, ALSO KNOWN AS TELUS MOBILITY, Defendant, AND ROGERS WIRELESS PARTNERSHIP, Defendant, AND MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, 13 TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE AND PALM,INC., Defendant-Appellant, AND CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, DOING BUSINESS AS VERIZON WIRELESS, Defendant-Appellant, AND HELlO, LLC AND SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellants, AND LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC., Defendant-Appellant, AND MOTOROLA, INC., NOW KNOWN AS MOtOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellant, AND IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED, Defendant, AND DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG, MOBILEONE LTD., ORANGE LIMITED, ORANGE NEDERLAND N.V., TURK CELL ILETISIM HIZMETLERI A.S., AND UPSIDE WIRELESS INC., ALSO KNOWN AS IPIPI, Defendants, AND
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., Intervenor. TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 14 2011-1612, -1613
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland in case no. 07-CV-3012, Judge Alex- ander Williams, Jr.
ON MOTION
ORDER The Defendants-Cross Appellants move to voluntarily dismiss Cross-Appeal Nos. 2011-1612 and 2011-1613 and to conform the briefing schedule to the dismissal of the cross appeals. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion to dismiss cross appeal nos. 2011-1612 and 2011-1613 is granted. 2011-1612 and 2011-1613 are dismissed. The revised official caption for 2011-1581 is reflected above. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 2011-1612 and 2011-1613. (3) The motion to conform the briefing schedule is granted to the extent that the appellees' principal briefs are due on February 24, 2012 and the appellant's reply brief is due on March 30,2012. FOR THE COURT
JAN 202012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly