'83.
"Q THAT IS ALL I WANT TO KNOW ABOUT. I'M TRYING TO FIND OUT ABOUT THE DATES THESE THINGS HAPPENED BECAUSE WHEN YOU WERE WORKING -
"MR. FUSILIER: I WILL OBJECT TO THIS. IS THIS A QUESTION?
"MR. VENDRASCO: IT'S GOT TO BE.
"THE COURT: ALL RIGHT.
"BY MR. GINDES:
"Q WHEN YOU WERE WORKING AT HOME PLATE PIZZA, YOUR KIDS HAD ALREADY GONE INTO FOSTER CARE, CORRECT?
"A YES.
"Q I WANT TO CALL YOUR ATTENTION TO THE TIME YOU WERE PREGNANT WITH THE CHILD THAT YOU EVENTUALLY HAD, ALL RIGHT?
*738 "A WHICH ONE.
"Q THE ONE YOU HAD IN AUGUST OF '83.
"A OKAY.
"MR. FUSILIER: I WILL OBJECT TO THIS AGAIN, ALL OF THIS UNDER 352 IS MORE PREJUDICIAL THAN PROBATIVE. COUNSEL IS ATTEMPTING TO PREJUDICE THE TESTIMONY OF THIS WITNESS BY SUCH TESTIMONY ONLY.
"THE COURT: HE SAYS HE IS TRYING TO GET DATES.
"MR. FUSILIER: THAT IS WHAT HE SAYS, BUT IT'S OBVIOUS HE IS TRYING TO TAINT THIS PERSON'S CHARACTER IS WHAT HE IS TRYING TO DO.
"MR. GINDES: NO, I'M NOT. I'M NOT TRYING TO DO THAT AT ALL.
"THE COURT: AS AN OFFICER OF THE COURT, I ASSUME HE WOULDN'T TRY TO DO THAT. OBJECTION OVERRULED."
Gindes then began questioning about the amount of time Ms. Dill actually spent with Dill, during the period of time in which the molestations were alleged to have occurred. The following ensued:
"Q [by Gindes]: YOUR CHILDREN STAYED WHERE?
".... .... .... .... ....
"RIGHT AFTER THE CHILD YOU SAID YOU HAD WITH WAYNE DILL -
"MR. FUSILIER: I WILL OBJECT, WHERE THE CHILD IS LIVING.
"THE COURT: OVERRULED.
"THE WITNESS [Linda Dill]: WHEN I MOVED IN WITH DELL [a friend of Ms. Dill's], STEVEN HAD YET TO BE BORN.
"BY MR. GINDES:
"Q HE WAS BORN AFTER YOU MOVED IN WITH DELL?
*739 "A YES.
"Q DID HE LIVE WITH YOU AND DELL?
"A NO.
"MR. FUSILIER: I OBJECT, THAT IS IRRELEVANT.
"THE COURT: OVERRULED.
"BY MR. GINDES:
"Q WHERE DID HE LIVE?
"A HE WAS PUT IN A FOSTER HOME RIGHT AFTER HE WAS BORN.
"Q LET ME ASK YOU A QUESTION, YOU SAY WAYNE DILL WAS THE FATHER OF THIS CHILD?
"A YES.
"Q DID YOU EVER SEE WAYNE DILL AND HIS CHILD TOGETHER?
"A YES.
"MR. RUBIN: OBJECTION.
"THE COURT: OVERRULED.
"BY MR. GINDES:
"Q WHERE DID YOU SEE HIM?
"A AT THE CAR LOT.
"MR. FUSILIER: I'M MAKING AN OBJECTION, I'M MAKING AN OBJECTION UNDER 352, MORE PREJUDICIAL THAN PROBATIVE. FURTHERMORE, IT'S IRRELEVANT.
"THE COURT: OBJECTION OVERRULED.
".... .... .... .... ....
*740 "BY MR. GINDES: YOU BROUGHT THE CHILD OVER TO THE CAR LOT TWICE; IS THAT CORRECT?
"A YES.
"Q HOW LONG DID HE STAY AT THE CAR LOT WITH THE CHILD?
"A ABOUT 15, 20 MINUTES.
"Q BESIDES THESE TWO, 15 TO 20 MINUTE STAYS, ARE YOU AWARE OF ANY OTHER TIMES AT ALL THAT WAYNE DILL HAD ANY CONTACT WITH HIS CHILD?
"MR. RUBIN: OBJECTION,