IRRELEVANT WHAT SHE KNOWS.
"THE COURT: OVERRULED.
"BY MR. GINDES:
"Q ARE YOU PERSONALLY AWARE OF ANY OTHERS?
"A NO.
"Q THIS IS AUGUST OF 1983 UNTIL WHAT, JUNE OF 1984?
"A YES.
"Q MR. DILL NEVER WENT TO SEE HIS OWN CHILD?
"A HE WAS IN A FOSTER HOME.
"MR. FUSILIER: OBJECTION, 352.
"MR. GINDES: YOUR HONOR, SHE SAYS WAYNE DILL FATHERED THE CHILD IN SEPTEMBER OF 1983. I THINK THE FATHER OF THE CHILD AS A NATURAL REASONABLE CONSEQUENCE YOU GO VISIT THE CHILD, SEE THE CHILD. YOU DON'T JUST IGNORE THE CHILD.
"MR. SIMS: HE IS ASSUMING A FACT NOT IN EVIDENCE BECAUSE SHE SAID THE CHILD WASN'T THERE.
"THE COURT: SHE SAID THE CHILD WAS IN A FOSTER HOME.
"BY MR. GINDES:
*741 "Q WHEN DID THE CHILD GO INTO THE FOSTER HOME?
"A RIGHT OUT OF THE HOSPITAL.
"MR. FUSILIER: I WILL OBJECT, THIS IS IRRELEVANT AND INFLAMMATORY.
"MR. RUBIN: IT'S ALSO BEEN ASKED AND ANSWERED. THE DATE'S BEEN GIVEN ALREADY.
"THE COURT: OVERRULED....
".... .... .... .... ....
"BY MR. GINDES:
"Q THEN AFTER THAT YOU TOOK THE CHILD OVER TO THE CAR LOT?
"A YES.
"Q WHERE DID YOU GET THE CHILD FROM?
"MR. RUBIN: OBJECTION, IRRELEVANT, 352.
"MR. FUSILIER: THIS PERSON ISN'T ON TRIAL, YOUR HONOR. I OBJECT THAT IS IRRELEVANT.
"THE COURT: SUSTAINED. I THINK SHE SAID FROM THE FOSTER HOME.
"BY MR. GINDES:
"Q WAS THERE A DISPUTE BETWEEN YOU AND WAYNE DILL ABOUT WHO THE [sic] FATHERED THAT CHILD?
"MR. FUSILIER: OBJECTION, THAT IS IRRELEVANT.
"THE COURT: WHAT IS THE RELEVANCY OF THAT, COUNSEL?
"MR. GINDES: I THINK IT GOES TO HER TESTIMONY ABOUT SEXUAL RELATIONS WITH WAYNE DILL IN 1982. I THINK SHE IS TRYING TO SHOW A RELATIONSHIP WITH WAYNE DILL AND THE PEOPLE INTEND TO SHOW IT WAS NOT THAT CLOSE.
*742 "THE COURT: OBJECTION OVERRULED."
This was not the end of the evidence adduced about Dill's children. During Gindes's cross-examination of Dill, the following occurred:
"Q SO YOU CLAIM THAT STEVEN IS YOUR CHILD, RIGHT?
"A YES.
"Q DID YOU EVER GO TO SEE STEVEN?
"A NO.
"Q HOW COME?
"A BECAUSE STEVEN WAS TAKEN FROM THE HOSPITAL.
"MR. FUSILIER: THAT IS IRRELEVANT.
"BY MR. GINDES:
"Q DID YOU EVER GO SEE STEVEN?
"MR. RUBIN: I'M GOING TO OBJECT TO THIS QUESTION AS BEING IRRELEVANT AND MORE TIME CONSUMING THAN PROBATIVE.
"THE COURT: WHAT IS THE NEXT QUESTION.
"BY MR. GINDES:
"Q DID YOU EVER GO SEE STEVEN WHERE HE HAD BEEN TAKEN?
"MR. FUSILIER: OBJECTION, IRRELEVANT.
"MR. GINDES: WOULDN'T THE ORDINARY, REASONABLE PARENT, IF THAT IS [W]HAT HE IS, AND HAD A SON, GO AND SEE THE CHILD?
"MR. RUBIN: THAT IS NOT RELEVANT TO THIS CASE. WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH THIS CASE?
"MR. GINDES: WHETHER HE WENT TO SEE THE CHILD.
"MR. RUBIN: I DON'T SEE THE RELEVANCE TO THIS CASE.
*743 "MR. FUSILIER: IT'S IRRELEVANT.
"MR. GINDES: I THINK MOST NORMAL PEOPLE, WHEN THEY FATHER A CHILD, WOULD WANT