If02(5 NO.04-15-00018-CR ORIGINAL IN THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
CHARLES ANTHONY LHERAULT APPELLANT
THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE
J* -I*.A.J* -.'- -.'- kf..A. .A..A. .A..A.-A. "", "",.A. "(' -V "V '*•* "-''*'" "'•* -''*"V *•'•* *•'- J'- J>-'J* -1-* "'' "''*'-"'*
PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW ~V -' - A- -*- "•- *•- *•- "A. "*- "*- .A. "A. ""- -A. .A. -A. -A. -A, -A. -A, -A. **- "•- .A. "A. -A. "A".A. .A. .A. *A. -t" .A, J . fc""
ON APPEAL FROM THE 175TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS CAUSE NUMBER 2013-CR-10281 FILED j\j COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
p.D.R. FROM APPELLANT Abel Acosta, Cierk -I- .A. .A. *"- J- ""--A.-A. "!*.A. .A. .A, .A, "!" .A, "A..A. .A. .A. .A, "f,
CHARLES ANTHONY LHERAULT T.D.C.J.-C.I.D.#1972430 2400 WALLACE PACK ROAD NAVASOTA, TEXAS 77868
*Eci=ivi=D RECEIVED IN OCT 2 7 2015 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS JWRDC0U& &P£4tS SW OCT 27 2015
^bet Acosta,Clerk (A)IDENTITY OF JUDGE, PARTIES, AND COUNSEL. CHIEF JUSTICE SANDEE BRYAN MARION, KAREN ANGELINI, JASON PULLIAM
NICHOLAS LaHOOD CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY
ANDREW N. WARTHEN. ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY
MICHAEL D. ROBBINS ASSISTANT PUBLIC DEFENDER
(B)TABLE OF CONTENTS: N/A
(C)INDEX OF AUTHORITIES: N/A
(D)STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENTS: N/A
(E)STATEMENT OF THE
(F.) STATEMENT OF PROCEDURAL
(G)GROUNDS FOR
(H)ARGUMENT: N/A
PRAYER
Appellant PRAYS this P.D.R. is processed as soon as possible, in
that he is able to file his 11.07/§2254 within the time limits set
by the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
(J)APPENDIX: N/A UNSWORN DECLARATION
COMES NOW, Charles Anthony Lherault, Petitioner in the above
styled and numbered cause, declares under the penalty of perjury
that the above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Charles Anthony Lherault 2400 Wallace Pack Road Navasota, Texas 77868
PRO SE jfourtl) Court of Appeals ^>an Antonio, tEexas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-15-00018-CR
Charles Anthony LHERAULT, Appellant
v.
• The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CR10281 Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Jason Pulliam, Justice
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 30, 2015
AFFIRMED
Background
Charles Lherault was charged with the offenses of assault-family violence by choking or
strangulation and continuous family violence. Prior to trial on the merits, a jury was empaneled to determine whether Lherault was competent to stand trial. That jury found Lherault competent
to stand trial. Subsequently, another jury convicted Lherault and assessed punishment at
confinement for twenty-six years and ten years, respectively. 04-15-00018-CR
In one issue on appeal, Lherault contends the first jury's finding that he was competent to
stand trial was against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence. Lherault's argument
is construed as a challenge to the factual sufficiency of the first jury's competency determination.
We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Standard of Review
In reviewing a defendant's factual-sufficiency challenge to a jury's competency verdict,
the appellate court must consider all the evidence relevant