COURT'S ATTENTION. THEREFORE, THE PROCEDURE OF FILING AN APPLICATION OR A MOTION WOULD COME WITHIN THE DEFINITION OF A "PROCEEDING".
MOREOVER, THE LANGUAGE IN TITLE 28 O.S. 152 (1990), APPEARS TO BE CLEAR AND UNAMBIGUOUS IN THAT IT STATES ANY OTHER PROCEEDING AFTER JUDGMENT". WHEN STATUTES ARE UNAMBIGUOUS THERE IS NO ROOM FOR CONSTRUCTION OR FURTHER INQUIRY, AS THE LEGISLATURE PLAINLY EXPRESSES ITS INTENT. HUAHES DRILLING CO. V. MORGAN, 648 P.2D 32 (OKLA. 1982). THE TERMS OF TITLE 28 O.S. 1528 ARE CLEAR AND UNAMBIGUOUS AND IT WOULD THEREFORE, APPEAR THAT HE LANGUAGE IS CONTROLLING. THEREFORE, "ANY OTHER PROCEEDING AFTER JUDGMENT" WOULD INCLUDE APPLICATIONS FOR ORDERS NUNC PRO TUNC AS IT IS A PROCEEDING AFTER JUDGMENT.
(DIANE L. SLAYTON)