which had been revoked, such that
Silverado Silverado should beassessed shouldbe exemplary assessed exemplary orpunitive or damages. punitive damages.
E CONSPIRACY E
Silverado Appx. 0429 No. 1-15-567-CV 1551 43 Plaintiffs claimdamages claim damages againstthe Silveradobased against the Silverado based on alleged thealleged on the
CarolManley, amongCarol conspiracy among Manley,David andSilverado David and Silverado to accomplish to accomplish unlawful anunlawful an
Conspiracy purpose. Conspiracy existshere exists herebecause thereare because there (l) two are(1) twoor ormore (2)an persons,(2) more persons, an ·~ objectto object accomplished, (3) beaccomplished, to be meetingoofftheminds (3) aa meeting theobject onthe the minds on ofthe object of course the course
ofaction, of (4)one action, (4) oneormore unlawful, or more unlawful, overt acts, and(5)damages acts,and theproximate asthe (5) damages as proximate
result. result.
44 PlaintiffsC Plaintiffs arolandTonya Carol and Tonya Peterson Peterson allege andwould allege and thatSilverado provethat would prove Silverado
agreed withCarolManley agreedwith andDavid Carol Manley and violateor toviolate David to Ruby`s orinfringe Ruby's rightsagainst rights against
falseimprisonment and/orassault false imprisonment and/or assaultand andbattery, under thefactsalleged battery, under inthis the facts alleged in case. this case.
Plaintiffs Plaintiffs C arolandTonya Carol and Tonya Peterson Peterson alsoallegeandwould thatSilverado provethat also allege and would prove Silverado
agreedwith agreed withCarol Manleyand Carol Manley andDavid violateor toviolate David to Plaintiffs' thePlaintiffs' orinfringe the rightsto rights to r!) visitation visitation with with Ruby, Ruby, under under the the ffacts acts alleged alleged inthis in this c ase. case. Silverado Silverado also also took took one one
or more or unlawful,overt moreunlawful, overtacts againstRuby acts against Rubyandthe Plaintiffs, andcaused and the Plaintiffs, and them caused them
damages damages proximate asaa proximate as result ofsuchwrongful resultof acts. such wrongful acts. PRE-JUDGMENT PRE-JUDGMENT AND AND POST JUDGMENT INTEREST POST JUDGMENT INTEREST 0 45 Plaintiffsaallege llegeandwould provethatSilverado themof 45 Plaintiffs and would prove that Silverado h asdeprived has deprived them the of the
use of such use of suchfundsthat beawarded maybe funds that may awardedas damages iin actualdamages as actual n this thiscase. case.As As aa
proximate proximate result, result, tthey have been deprived o heyhavebeendeprived offtheopportunity investsuch to invest the opportunity to suchfunds funds
Silverado Appx. 0430 No. 1-15-567-CV 1552 TAB 52 FILED 12/5/2014 4:32:08 PM DATA ENTRY Stan Stanart PICK UP THIS DATE c rk County Clerk
CAUSE PROBATE COURT PROBATE COURT 1 Harris County
CAUSE NO.427208-401 427208-401
INRE: IN RE: G UARDIANSHIP GUARDIANSHIP OF OF § INTHE IN THEPROBATE PROBATECOURT COURT § RUBY RUBY P ETERSON, PETERSON, § NUMBER NUMBERONE ONE ut 0 PROPOSED PROPOSEDWARD WARD § HARRIS HARRISCOUNTY, COUNTY,TEXAS TEXAS
Transferred Transferred from from the the 129th JudicialDistrict District CAUSE CAUSEN O.22014-40980 NO. 014-40980
MACKEY MACKEY ("MACK") ("MACK")GLEN GLENP ETERSON, PETERSON,§§ INTHE IN THEDISTRICT DISTRICTCOURT COURT PETERSON, PETERSON, Individually, Individually,NextFriend Next Friend §§ ofRUBY of RUBY PETERSON, PETERSON, DON DONLESLIE LESLIE §§ PETERSON, and PETERSON, Individually andas asNext Next §§ Friend, Friend, ofRUBY of RUBYPETERSON, PETERSON,and and § LONNY LONNY PETERSON, PETERSON, Individuallyandand §§ Next Next F riendooffRUBY Friend RUBY S.PETERSON, S. PETERSON, §§ Plaintiffs, § V. V. §§ HARRIS HARRISCCOUNTY, OUNTY, TEXAS