one charged." (People v. Alverson, supra, 60 Cal.2d at p. 810.)
*746 (18c) 3. During cross-examination of virtually every defendant who testified, Gindes adopted the technique of rereading the children's testimony. Although we need not determine whether such a technique is improper per se, it was carried to abusive extremes in the instant case. For example:
"Q [by Gindes] ... MR. DILL, YOU HAVE HEARD A NUMBER OF WITNESSES TESTIFY AGAINST YOU AND MAKE CERTAIN ALLEGATIONS AGAINST YOU; IS THAT CORRECT?
"A [by Wayne Dill] YES.
"Q FOR INSTANCE, YOU REMEMBER ON FEBRUARY 28TH OF 1985, BEING PRESENT HERE WHEN CHRISTINA [H.] TESTIFIED?
"A YES.
"Q AND DID YOU REMEMBER CHRISTINA [H.] TESTIFYING ON THAT DATE THAT SHE SAW YOU TOUCHING CHILDREN WHEN THEY WERE NAKED AT THE GREEN HOUSE?
"A YES.
"Q AND DID YOU ALSO OBSERVE CHRISTINA [H.] POINT YOU OUT AND IDENTIFY YOU AS A PERSON ON THAT DATE WHO HAD BEEN PRESENT AT THE GREEN HOUSE WHEN CHILDREN WERE MOLESTED?
"MR. FUSILIER: I WILL STIPULATE HE WAS PRESENT AND HEARD ALL THAT, YOUR HONOR.
"MR. GINDES: I THINK WE CAN GET INTO SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS.
"MR. FUSILIER: I THINK THE JURY HEARD IT AND I WILL OBJECT, WASTING TIME.
"MR. EYHERABIDE: I WILL JOIN THE OBJECTION.
"MR. GINDES: I THINK WE CAN ASK HIM ABOUT EACH ALLEGATION MADE.
"THE COURT: OBJECTION OVERRULED. I SHOULD SAY, OBJECTION IS PLURALLY OVERRULED.
"BY MR. GINDES:
*747 "Q DID YOU HEAR CHRISTINA [H.] TELL US THAT SHE HAD BEEN WITH YOU ON TEN OCCASIONS BESIDES BEING AT THE GREEN HOUSE?
"A YES.
"Q IS THAT TRUE OR FALSE?
"MR. EYHERABIDE: WHAT IS THE RELEVANCY IF HE HEAR[D] IT OR NOT?
"MR. GINDES: BECAUSE I'M CONFRONTING WITH ALLEGATIONS.
"THE COURT: LET HIM PHRASE HIS OWN QUESTIONS, COUNSEL. OBJECTION OVERRULED. LET'S PROCEED.
".... .... .... .... ....
"BY MR. GINDES:
"Q IS THAT TRUE OR FALSE?
"MR. EYHERABIDE: ARGUMENTATIVE, YOUR HONOR, FOR THE JURY TO DETERMINE THAT.
"THE COURT: OBJECTION OVERRULED.
"BY MR. GINDES:
"Q SHE INDICATED THAT SHE HAD SEEN YOU ON TEN OTHER OCCASIONS BESIDE BEING AT THE GREEN HOUSE. WAS THAT TRUE OR FALSE?
"MR. EYHERABIDE: I'M GOING TO OBJECT, ARGUMENTATIVE, ALSO UNDER 352, THE PROBATIVE VALUE IS OUTWEIGHED BY THE WASTE OF TIME WHILE HE REHASHES THE TESTIMONY FROM SEVERAL MONTHS AGO.
"MR. GINDES: I'M NOT GOING TO REHASH THE TESTIMONY.
"THE COURT: OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED.
"PROCEED.
"BY MR. GINDES:
*748 "Q IS THAT TRUE OR FALSE THAT SHE INDICATED SHE HAD SEEN YOU MORE THAN TEN TIMES BESIDES SEEING YOU AT THE GREEN HOUSE?
"MR. EYHERABIDE: I WILL ALSO OBJECT AS IRRELEVANT.
"MR. VENDRASCO: HOW MANY TIMES DO THEY GET TO OBJECT.
"THE COURT: LET'S GET ALL THESE OBJECTIONS.
"MR. FUSILIER: MY OBJECTION IS, YOUR HONOR, IT'S ASSUMING SOMETHING NOT IN EVIDENCE. I DON'T BELIEVE SHE SAID THAT. I DON'T BELIEVE SHE SAID THAT, NOT THE WAY YOU'RE READING IT. SLOW DOWN.
"MR. VAN METER: MAY THE RECORD REFLECT THAT MR. GINDES TOOK SOME OFFENSIVE ACTION TOWARD MR.