DID NOT OFFER TO STOP FORECLOSURE OR TO REFUND APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO HIS SHARE TO STOP FORECLOSURE APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO BORROWED 3500 TO STOP FORECLOSURE SEE COPY OF CHECK AND WANTS TO BE REFUNDED APPELLEE MANUEL CASTRO DID NOTHING TO PROTECT HIS INTEREST IN THE MARTIAL HOME 1501 OLIVE ST IT WAS APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO WHO CARRIED THE EXPENSE AND IS REQUESTING A REFUND FROM THE COURTS APPELLEE MANUEL CASTRO WAS TO HAVE PREVENTED THE FORECLOSURE AND HE DID NOTHING.
APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO HAS REPAID THE LOAN AND WANTS TO BE REIMBURSED THE 3500 SHE IS NOT EMPLOYEED SHE HAD TO SEEK EMPLOYMENT DUE TO APPELLEE MANUEL CASTRO NOT SUPPORTING HER INSTEAD APPELLEE MANUEL CASTRO USED THE COMMUNITY FUNDS TO SUPPORT HIS AFFAIR WITH MISTRESS CHRISTINA PACHECO IF APPELLANT MANUEL CAN AFFORD TO PAY FOR HIS MISTRESS THEN HE SHOULD PAY ALIMONY FOR APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO FOR SHE WAS LEGALLY MARRIED TO APPELLEE MANUEL CASTRO FOR 29 YEARS AND IS THE DISABLED SPOUSE WITHIN THE MARRIAGE HER DISABILTY DOLLAR
AMOUNT HAS DROPPED DUE TO HER TIME BEING EMPLOYEED AND THIS HARMED HER FINANCIALLY APPELLEE MANUEL CASTRO DUTY WAS TO APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO AND HE HAS NOT FINANCIALLY SUPPORTED HER THROUGH THE PROCESS OF DIVORCE WHICH WAS TO PAY THE MORTGAGE PAYMENT AND HE DID NOT INSTEAD PAID FOR HIS EXTRA MARTIAL AFFAIR WITH THE NON SPOUSE MISTRESS CHRISTINA PACHECO.
APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO DOES NOT HAVE A CATERING BUSINESS AS COUNSEL JOSEPH APPELT HAD ATTACKED HER IN CONTESTING HER AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY APPELLEE MANUEL CASTRO KNEW OF APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO DISABILTY NOW AND
DURING THE MARRIAGE HIS COMMENTS ARE YOU CAN WORK AND SHE CAN'T SHE IS UNDER DOCTOR CARE AND HER DISABILTY FUNDS HAVE BEEN LOWERED DUE TO BEING EMPLOYED APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO WAS EMPLOYEED ONLY TO SUPPORT THE COMMUNITY 1501
OLIVE APPELLEE MANUEL CASTRO PUT IN BANKRUPTCY AND HAD NOT SUPPORTED THE DEBTS OWED IN THE MARRIAGE OF MANUEL AND MARYANN CASTRO AND SUPPORT THE COST OF LIVING NEEDS OF THE DISABLED SPOUSE APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO
APPELLEE MANUEL CASTRO HAD NOT SUPPORT APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO DURING THE PROCESS OF DIVORCE AND ON THE FINAL DIVORCE AGREEMENT OCT 30,2013 APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO SHOULD HAVE BEEN AWARDED ALIMONY SHE DID NOT GIVE
UP HER RIGHT S COUNSEL JOSEPH APPELT TAMPERED WITH THE AGREEMENT THE ORIGINAL WAS NEVER FILED AND THERE WAS NO RECORD THAT'S WHY HE WAS PUSHING TO ENFORCE THE AGREEMENT KNOWING THE FRAUD HE CONSPIRED WITH AND TAMPERED WITH THE AGREEMENT FOR FINAL DIVORCE
APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO HAS BEEN CHALLENGING THE AGREEMENT FOR OVER A YEAR
AND A HALF ANDTHE7IPW BEING PRESENTED TO APPEALS COURT THE EVIDENCE THAT SHOWS THE TRUTH AS TO WHY THE DIVORCE SHOULD BE REOPEND AND REWRITTEN TO A JUST AND RIGHT DIVORCE DECREE ALL COUNSEL JOSEPH APPPELT DID WAS PREVENT THE TRUTH FROM BEING SPOKEN IN COURT AND COST APPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO 20,000 IN ATTORNEY FEES AND APPPELLANT MARYANN CASTRO IS ASKING THE COUURT TO REFUND
HER DUE TO THE DISHONESTY OF APPELLEE MANUEL