TO PROVIDE A HEARING DATE ON THE DISPOSITIVE MOTION TO DISMISSS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND THE LACK OF THE COURT'S JURISDICTION. THIS VIOLATED APPELLANT'S [AND OTHERS] RIGHTS SECURED BY ARTICLE I, SECTION 16, OHIO CONSTI- TUTION AND THE 14TH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATE'S CONSTITUTION.
[2.] THE COURT OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE CHARLES SCHNEIDER ERRED IN ITS FAILURE TO TIMELY RULE AND HIS DENIAL OF A MOTION TO STRIKE THE PLEADINGS OF ATTORNEY SARAH GRAHAM, No. 14AP-171 3
CLEVELAND, AS THE ATTORNEY OF RECORD ERIC WILLISON HAD NOT WITHDRAWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH FRANKLIN COUNTY RULE 1801 [B] DEPRIVING APPELLANT OF HIS 1ST AND 14TH AMENDMENTS TO THE US CONSTITUTION; ARTICLE 1 SECTION 16 OF THE OHIO CONSTITUTION, AND THE PREAMBLE TO THE LOCAL FRANKLIN COUNTY COURT RULES.
[3.] THE COURT OF JUDGE SCHNEIDER ERRED IN REFERING THIS INSTANT CASE WHICH DEMANDED TRIAL BY JURY ON BOTH THE FED AND ITS "MOTION TO DISMISS - LACK OF JURISDICTION"; SPECIFIC ANSWER DENING AND INITIAL COUNTER CLAIM FOR COMPENSATORY AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES; TO ANYONE OTHER THAN LAWFULLY APPOINTED MAGISTRATE PURSUANT TO ORCP53 [A AND C] DEPRIVING PLAINTIFF OF HIS 1ST AND 14TH AMENDMENTS TO THE US CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 1 SECT 16 TO THE OHIO CONSTITUTION.
[4.] THE COURT OF JUDGE SCHNEIDER AND HIS UNLAWFULLY ASSIGNED MAGISTRATES ERR IN HOLDING AND PROCEEDING WITH LESS THAN 10 DAYS NOTICE TO DEFENDANT APPELLANT BECAUSE OF PROVISIONS OF A SPEEDY HEARING/TRIAL IN ORC 2945.71 SPECIFICALLY WAVES ANY SPEEDY TRIAL PROVISIONS IF ANY MOTIONS OR REQUEST OR CONTINUANCE IS FILED WHICH HAS DEPRIVED APPELLANT OF HIS 1ST AND 14TH AMENDMENTS TO THE US CONSTITUTION, AND TO HIS RIGHTS TO A TRIAL BY JURY AS REQUIRED BY THIS HONORABLE COURT IN A UNANIMOUS DECISAION IN NCR V TIMSON, 38 OHIO APP. 3RD 798 [1992] THE RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY WAS AGAIN CONFIRMED BY THE VERY SUMMONS IN THIS INSTANT CASE.
[5.] THE COURTS OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE CHARLES SCHNEIDER ERRED IN FAILING TO APPOINT MAGI- STRATES PURSUSANT TO 53 1 FC LOCAL RULES AND THE REFERALLS TO VARIOUS NON-APPOINTED MAGISTRATES ERRED IN THEIR UNSCHEDULED AND NON-PUBLISHED TRIAL DATES OF DECEMBER 10TH, 2013 JANUARY 23RD, 2014; FEBRUARY 6TH, 2014, FEB 10TH, 2014, FEB 20TH, 2014 DEPRIVING DEFENDANT OF PUBLISHED TRIAL SCHEDULES, TIMELY WRITTEN NOTICES, OR A VOICE COMMUNICATION TO THE No. 14AP-171 4
BLIND, TRIAL BY JURY OR RULING UPON HIS MOTION TO DISMISS. IN VIOLATION OF RIGHTS SECURED BY THE 1ST AND 14TH AMENDMENTS TO THE US CONSTITUION, ARTICLE I SECTION 16 OF THE OHIO CONSTITUTION, OHIO RULES OF CIVIL PRCEDURE LAWS CITED SUPRA.
[6.] THE COURT ERRED IN ITS WRIT OF EXECUTION RECOMMENDED BY NON APPOINTED MAGISTRATE PETTUCCI OF FEB 20, 2014 BY JUDGE SCHNEIDER ON FEB 25, 2014 BEING LESS THAN 5 DAYS FOR DEFEND- ANT TO OBJECT TO THE NON-NON PUBLISHED HEARING OF FEB 20, 2014 THAT FAILED TO RULE ON HIS MOTION TO DISMISS AND OR MOTION TO STRIKE AND DEPRIVED APPELLANT OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO TIMELY NOTICE AND A TRIAL