DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY This is an appeal from the judgment of the Toledo Municipal Court which, following a jury trial, found appellant, Edward Emery, guilty of criminal trespass, in violation of Toledo Municipal Code ("TMC") section 541.05(A), which is identical to R.C. 2911.21, and criminal damaging, in violation of TMC 541.03(A)(1), which is identical to R.C. 2929.06. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the decision of the trial court.
Appellant raises the following assignments of error:
"ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER ONE
"THE JURY VERDICT IN THIS CASE WAS AGAINST THE MANIFEST WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE (OR ALTERNATELY THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO CONVICT APPELLANT).
"ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER TWO
"DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR DIRECTED VERDICT OF ACQUITTAL SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED UPON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOLLOWING THE CLOSE OF THE PROSECUTOR'S CASE (AS TO THE CRIMINAL DAMAGING CASE).
"ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER THREE
"IT WAS ERROR FOR THE COURT TO HEAR THE PETITION TO DISQUALIFY OF [sic] APPELLANT WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD THEREIN (AND REFUSAL TO GRANT SUCH MOTION).
"ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER FOUR
"IT WAS ERROR OF THE COURT AND IT IS CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE U.S. AND OHIO CONSTITUTION FOR A DEFENDANT TO BE SENTENCED TO INCARCERATION FOR A PERIOD OF 150 DAYS HEREIN (ON THREE MISDEMEANOR CHARGES) WHEN HE HAS NO SERIOUS PRIOR CRIMINAL RECORD OF FELONIES OR OF VIOLENT ASSAULT.
"ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER FIVE
"THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO FIND THE DEFENDANT GUILTY OF VIOLATING TMC SECTION 536.05 [sic] (SECTION CRIMINAL DAMAGING) AND OF TMC SECTION 2909.10 [sic] (CRIMINAL TRESPASSING).
"ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER SIX
"THE STATUTES UNDER WHICH APPELLANT WAS CHARGED, AND THE CHARGED CONDUCT OF APPELLANT INVOLVED IN ALL CASES SUBJECT OF THIS APPEAL ARE CONSTITUTIONALLY UNENFORCEABLE.
"ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER SEVEN
"IN TRIAL THE COURT ERRED IN ADMITTING EXHIBITS 2, 3, AND 4 (OF THE APPELLEE CITY OF TOLEDO - THE VIDEO TAPES)
"ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER EIGHT
"THE COURT ERRED IN FAILING TO GRANT APPELLANT AN OPPORTUNITY OT [sic] BE HEARD ON THE ISSUE OF BAIL AND STAY OF SENTENCE PENDING APPEAL AND ALSO ERRED IN DENYING THE APPELLANT THE RIGHT TO STAY AND/OR SAME AT THE TIME OF SENTENCING.
"ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER NINE
"THE COURT ERRED BY PERMITTING TESTIMONY AS TO EVENTS BETWEEN APPELLANT AND APPELLEE CONSIDERABLY PREDATING THE ALLEGED VIOLATIONS.
"ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER TEN
"IT WAS PLAIN ERROR FOR THE COURT TO PERMIT DEBRA BENNETT'S TESTIMONY REGARDING HER UNFOUNDED AND UNCHARGED ALLEGATIONS THAT APPELLANT WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR HER PREVIOUS NUMBER OF FLAT TIRES AND OTHER VANDALISM TO HER HOME IN LIGHT OF THE FACT THAT SHE DID NOT PERSONALLY WITNESS ANY SUCH ACTIVITY.
"ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER ELEVEN
"THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY NOT GRANTING APPELLANT'S MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 15, 2001.
"ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER TWELVE
"THE COURT ERRED IN NOT RULING UPON OR CONSIDERING THE APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR ACQUITTAL AFTER THE JURY VERDICT OF GUILTY.
"ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER THIRTEEN
"THE COURT ERRED