THAT MEANS THAT GOODS FROM NON-MEMBER COUNTRIES ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE SAME CONDITIONS OF IMPORTATION , WITH REGARD TO CUSTOMS AND COMMERCIAL CONSIDERATIONS , IRRESPECTIVE OF THE STATE IN WHICH THEY WERE RELEASED INTO FREE CIRCULATION .
21 IN THAT CONNECTION , THE COMMISSION CONSIDERS THAT THERE IS NO REASON TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN DISPARITIES CAUSED BY MEASURES OF COMMERCIAL POLICY TAKEN BY A MEMBER STATE ON ITS OWN ACCOUNT AND DISPARITIES CAUSED BY MEASURES OF COMMERCIAL POLICY ADOPTED BY THE COMMUNITY AND SUBSEQUENTLY IMPLEMENTED BY A MEMBER STATE .
22 FURTHERMORE , THE COMMISSION ARGUES THAT THE EXISTENCE OF SUCH DISPARITIES MAY NOT BE DISREGARDED BY ARGUING , AS TEZI DOES , THAT THE DIVISION INTO NATIONAL SUBQUOTAS IS JUSTIFIED ON PURELY ADMINISTRATIVE GROUNDS . ON THE CONTRARY , AS IS CLEAR FROM THE 10TH RECITAL IN THE PREAMBLE TO REGULATION NO 3589/82 , THAT DIVISION IS THE INEVITABLE RESULT OF THE FACT THAT THE IMPORT SYSTEM PROVIDED FOR IN THAT REGULATION IS STILL NOT UNIFORM .
23 AS REGARDS THE MEANS OF DEALING WITH THE DIFFICULTIES WHICH MIGHT STEM FROM THOSE DISPARITIES , THE COMMISSION CONSIDERS THAT THE ONLY EFFECTIVE APPROACH IS TO UTILIZE THE POSSIBILITIES AFFORDED BY ARTICLE 115 . IN ITS VIEW , THE POSSIBILITY PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 7 ( 2 ) OF REGULATION NO 3589/82 OF ADAPTING THE NATIONAL SUBQUOTAS CANNOT BE UTILIZED IN A CASE OF THIS KIND SINCE THAT PROCEDURE IS INTENDED TO BE APPLIED SOLELY TO DIRECT IMPORTS .
24 THE NETHERLANDS GOVERNMENT AND THE UNITED KINGDOM , INTERVENING IN SUPPORT OF THE COMMISSION , ESSENTIALLY SHARE THE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY THE COMMISSION .
25 THE NETHERLANDS GOVERNMENT ARGUES IN PARTICULAR THAT THE APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 7 ( 2 ) OF REGULATION NO 3589/82 WOULD NOT HAVE HELPED TO RESOLVE THE DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED BY THE BENELUX COUNTRIES IN THIS CASE , FOR THAT ARTICLE MERELY ENABLES NATIONAL SUBQUOTAS TO BE EXTENDED , WHICH WOULD BE COMPLETELY CONTRARY TO THE BENELUX COUNTRIES ' INTERESTS AND WOULD NOT IN ANY CASE HAVE STOPPED THE INFLUX OF PARALLEL IMPORTS OF THE TEXTILE PRODUCTS IN QUESTION .
26 THE COURT MUST OBSERVE IN THE FIRST PLACE THAT , AS IT POINTED OUT IN ITS JUDGMENT IN DONCKERWOLCKE ( CITED ABOVE ), ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 9 ( 2 ) OF THE TREATY , THE PROVISIONS FOR THE LIBERALIZATION OF INTRA-COMMUNITY TRADE APPLY IN IDENTICAL FASHION TO PRODUCTS ORIGINATING IN MEMBER STATES AND TO PRODUCTS FROM NON-MEMBER COUNTRIES WHICH ARE IN FREE CIRCULATION IN THE COMMUNITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS LAID DOWN BY ARTICLE 10 . THE COURT ALSO MADE IT CLEAR THAT , AS REGARDS FREE CIRCULATION OF GOODS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY , PRODUCTS IN FREE CIRCULATION ARE DEFINITIVELY AND WHOLLY ASSIMILATED TO PRODUCTS ORIGINATING IN MEMBER STATES .
27 THE EXISTENCE OF A SYSTEM SUCH AS THAT LAID DOWN IN REGULATION NO 3589/82 FOR TEXTILE PRODUCTS ORIGINATING IN NON-MEMBER COUNTRIES WHICH ARE SIGNATORIES OF THE MULTI-FIBRE ARRANGEMENT IS NOT OF SUCH A NATURE AS