·, \'·
Into and For the Texas Court of Criminal ·his document c;:A·pp~a!&Gm&nd Its Justices, Supreme Court Building, ·Jages that are of 2§\}.r ~~it)/ 14th Street, Room#l06, Austin, Texas 78701 )t Llie time of imaging. ·In Re John Zavala(aka~JOE ZAVALA) § I nre: Cause# Is t y 1 e~~ra~owqs~w- Applicant-Relator-Pra Se, § 0943395-D . · ·Versus, § Judge(John/Jane Doe),for the 396th Judicail District Court of Tarrant § §§ SLOZ 61 smt County of the State Of Texas;Aridra- S1~dd~ 1~1\HIJ\ll~~ jQ Jacobs,Asst,Attorney to C~iminal - § District At~orny to Fort Worth Texas,· . § .Mot1on f · . .· N~ (iJ31A~31~3~ or sanct1ons & stric~ing Sharen Wilson,Fried McMillin,Cri~.D.A, § illegal thiid Part~'s Brief-under & Litigation Spe~iali~t-Post Conviction,: Writ of Mandamus AndRBddie D.Baker,Cu~todian of Record,et § al,for TDCJ-CID,et al ••.•. §
'·'···Relator's Application For An.Original Application FOR A Writ Of Mandamus Pursuant to; § 22.221 (b) of the Texas Government Code·, & Rule ·72 .1 f& ·2 ·oe ·: ~ The Texas Rules 'Of Appellate P~ocedure
To The Texas Court of. Criminal Appeals-Justices: Comes now before your said Appell~te Court,John Zavala,under .number as 01310 _ 27l(aka,but real name is Joe Zavala),and seeks for judicial Notice,and to l e t - there be understanding in this cause· of action sub judice and thus,has submitt- ed,and filed [t]his Application for a writ of mandamus against abo~e said Resp- ondent;,(s),and thus,~rivo~ing the jurisdiction of this Court bf Appial~ of ,.-· Texas, pu~suant to Texas Government Code,§ 22.22l(b),and Rule 72.1 arid 2 of the Texas- Rule of Appellate Procedure,as implemented with Article v,§5A of the Texas Cont- itution,but that mandamus is sought against the presiding judge over the habeas corpus proceeidings under number case,cause C-396-010512-0943395-D,and in CoUrt- for the judicial District of Tarrant County,Texas;for committing abuse of Autho- rity,and arbitrary acts in her/his judicial capacity,and discretion,in errorne-~
nously failing to perform its/her/his ministerial duties empaneled by State law, and for suspending procedures for implementing the writ of habeas corpus,and de- viating from the normal proceedings under article 11.07,§§ 1,2 & 3(a),& (b) of- the Texaa Code of Criminal Procedures,and application of the law and facts th- at is cited within this Relator's writ of habeas corpus,and it's findings of - facts and conclusions of law-attached to this Relator's Application for a writ- of habeas corpus,ad testificandum,and thus,these submitted petitions for Relate or's writ of habeas corpus were not heard or suppressed and not determined upon- the law and.facts shown by the trial Court's record,and reintroduced by Relator .as his exhibits(42 items in all).Inwhich Relator's main issue presented is that the trial COURT and it's judge,render~d a void judgment,based on the ProsecUtor- -'(s) f~lse and fake indictment~and that srtipped the trial Court of any ~urisd­ . ic.::tico over the subject-matter, cause of action and all Parties of interest -:- .. Wrose yet, said Respondent :has not acknowledged Relator's actual claims raised-• · !.Coat.· before it's Court 1 and intentionally failed to serve the correct and legal Per- son(s)-Party(s) of would have been Eddie D.Baker1-who is