(Tex. Crim. App. 2010). When evaluatingthe legal sufficiencyof the evidence,
we consider all of the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and
determinewhetherany rationaltrier of fact could have found the essentialelements
doubt.Jacksonv. Virginia,443 U.S. 307, 319, of the offensebeyonda reasonable
9 9 S. C t .2 7 8 1 ,2 7 8 9 (1 9 7 9 );M er r itt v. State,368S.W .3d516,525 ( Tex. Cr i m .
App.2012). The Statemay rely on circumstantialevidenceto establishguilt. See
C a r r i z a l e sv. S ta te ,4 1 4 S .W.3d 737,742 ( ' Tex.Cr im. App. 2013) . The le gal
standardis the samefor both direct and circumstantialevidencecases.1d
"The jurors are the exclusive judges of the facts, the credibility of the
witnesses,and the weight to be given to the testimony." Harris v. State, 364 S.W.3d328, 334 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2012,no pet.).We may not
ourjudgmentfor that of the factfinder.Williams reweighthe evidenceor substitute
v. State, 235 S.W.3d 742, 750 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). We presume that the
factfinder resolved any conflicting inferencesfrom the evidencein favor of the
verdict,and we def-erto that resolution.SeeJackson,443 U.S. at 326,99 S. Ct. at
2 1 9 3 :M e rri tt,3 6 8S .W.3d a t 5 2 6.
A personcommits the offenseof failure to comply with sex-offender
"if the personis requiredto registerand fails to comply registrationrequirements
with any requirementof' Chapter6'2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Tsx.
Conr,Cnrv. Pnoc.art.62.102(a); v. State,No. PD-0421-14,2015 Robinson WL
4 0 6 8 1 0 9a, t * 2 ( T e x .C r i m . A p p . J u l y 1 , 2 0 1 5 ) ;H a r u i s , 3 6 4S . W . 3 da t 3 3 4 .
to provideregistration Chapter62 requiressex offenderswho changeaddresses
authoritieswith the "anticipatedmovedateand new address"no laterthan seven
daysprior to moving,andto provide"proof of identityand proof of residence" to
agencyno laterthansevendaysaftermoving,or the first day the new enforcement
theagencyallowsthemto reportif later.Tpx.CooECRIM.Pnoc.art.62.055(a).
"lf the definition of an offensedoes not prescribea culpablemental state,a
culpable mental state is neverthelessrequired unless the definition plainly
dispenseswith any mentalelement."TEx. PENaI-CooE $ 6.02(b).Article 62.102(a)
doesnot containa culpablemental state,,nor doesit plainly dispensewith one.As a result,"$ 6.02(c)requiresthat Article 62.102(a)be read to requireintent,
to establish or recklessness knou,ledge, Robinson,2015 criminalresponsibility."
WL 4068109at *2. A personactsknowingly,or with knowledge,with respectto
surroundinehis conductwhen he is awarethat the circumstances circumstances
exist. Tex. PENal Cooe $ 6.03(b).A personacts recklesslywith respectto
surroundinghis conductwhen he is aware of but consciously circumstances
exist. disregardsa substantialand unjustifiablerisk that the circumstances
ft/. $ 6.03(c).
of a duty to Violationsof Article 62.102containtwo
Robinson, register,and failureto complywith one of the statute'srequirements.
2015 WL 4068109at *2. This court has previouslystatedthat "[w]hen the
indictmentallegesthata defendant'intentionallyor knowingly'failedto registeras
a sex offender," we would require "sufficient evidenceof the defendant's
or knowingfailure."Harris,364S.W.3dat 335.However,the Courtof intentional
CriminalAppealshasrecentlyheld in Robinsonv. State,No. PD-0421-14,
W L 4 0 6 8 1 0 9(T e x. C ri m. A p p .J uly 1,2015) .that