TO GO SEE THAT CHILD.
"THE COURT: HOW IS THAT RELEVANT TO THIS CASE?
"MR. VENDRASCO: HE SAID HE WAS - SHE SAID SHE WAS WITH WAYNE DILL AND WAS ALIBI[I]NG WAYNE DILL FOR THAT PERIOD OF TIME AND IT GOES TO THAT.
"THE COURT: OBJECTION OVERRULED.
"MR. FUSILIER: I WILL OBJECT AGAIN FOR THE RECORD. THIS IS MORE PREJUDICIAL BY A LONG WAYS THAN PROBATIVE. HE IS CONSTANTLY PREJUDICING THIS CLIENT.
"THE COURT: OVERRULED.
"BY MR. GINDES:
"Q IF THIS WAS YOUR CHILD, WHY DIDN'T YOU GO SEE THE CHILD?
"A BECAUSE I DIDN'T KNOW WHERE HE WAS AT.
"Q DID YOU TRY TO FIND OUT?
"MR. RUBIN: IRRELEVANT.
"THE COURT: OVERRULED.
"MR. FUSILIER: COLLATERAL MATTER, IRRELEVANT.
"THE WITNESS: YES.
"THE COURT: OVERRULED.
"BY MR. GINDES:
"Q DID YOU FIND OUT?
"MR. RUBIN: OBJECTION, IRRELEVANT.
*744 "THE COURT: OVERRULED.
"THE WITNESS: I TALKED TO SEVERAL CASE WORKERS AND BY THE TIME I GOT TO THE RIGHT CASE WORKER -
"MR. FUSILIER: I WILL OBJECT, IT'S BEEN ASKED AND ANSWERED. MOVE THE LATTER PORTION BE STRICKEN.
"THE COURT: REQUEST DENIED. FINISH YOUR ANSWER, SIR.
"REMEMBER THE QUESTION?
"THE WITNESS: YES. BY THE TIME I GOT TO THE RIGHT CASE WORKER I CALLED HER ONCE, WE HAD ARRANGEMENTS FOR ME TO SEE STEVEN AND THEN LINDA TOLD ME I COULD SEE STEVEN WITHOUT HER.
"BY MR. GINDES:
"Q BEFORE YOU WERE TAKEN INTO CUSTODY ON JUNE THE 29TH, WERE YOU BASICALLY OUT OF CUSTODY FOR EIGHT TO NINE MONTHS WHEN STEVEN WAS LIVING; IS THAT CORRECT?
"A YES.
"Q AND YOU NEVER, IN THOSE EIGHT TO NINE MONTHS, WENT TO SEE STEVEN ONCE; IS THAT CORRECT?
"MR. RUBIN: ASKED AND ANSWERED, IRRELEVANT.
"MR. FUSILIER: OBJECTION, IRRELEVANT.
"THE COURT: SUSTAINED.
"BY MR. GINDES:
"Q THIS GOING TO FIND THE CASE WORKER AND ALL THIS STUFF AND FINDING OUT WHERE STEVEN WAS, IT TOOK NINE MONTHS BEFORE YOU COULD GET THIS INFORMATION AND ATTEMPT TO VISIT STEVEN?
"MR. RUBIN: OBJECTION, IRRELEVANT.
"THE COURT: OVERRULED.
*745 "THE WITNESS: NO.
"BY MR. GINDES:
"Q HOW MANY MONTHS DID IT TAKE YOU?
"MR. RUBIN: OBJECTION, IRRELEVANT.
"THE COURT: OVERRULED.
"THE WITNESS: I DON'T KNOW.
"BY MR. GINDES:
"Q YOU INDICATED THAT WAYNE [D.] AND MARCELLA WAS HER MIDDLE NAME?
"A WAYNETTE.
"Q THEY ARE BOTH ALSO YOUR CHILDREN?
"A YES.
"Q DURING THE PERIOD OF TIME, 1982, THE LAST TWO MONTHS AND 1983, DID YOU VISIT THESE CHILDREN?
"A NO.
"Q EVER?
"A NO.
"MR. FUSILIER: OBJECTION, IRRELEVANT.
"THE COURT: OVERRULED."
(18b) It is difficult to see how this line of questioning was designed to show anything but Dill's shortcomings as a father. Whether we term it prosecutorial misconduct or error on the part of the trial court in admitting it, it should not have come in. (21) "[T]he guilt of a defendant of a particularly charged offense cannot be proved by evidence of general bad character, or, with certain exceptions not here applicable, by evidence of the commission of other crimes not relevant to the