COURT CAUSE NUMBERS 2015-473,2015-19565,2015-08974,2015-22666,AND 2015-22882
Prophet Ronald Dwayne Whitfield, Plaintiff
v. BIG STAR HONDA, et al., Defendants
Prophet Ronald Dwayne Whitfield's MOTIONS FOR RECUSAL OF JUDGE OF THE 113TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS; FOR HEARINGS TO HOLD BOTH COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT BIG STAR HONDA AND DEFENDANT BIG STAR HONDA ITSELF IN CONTEMPT OF COURT; TO STRIKE THE MOTION OF COUNSEL FOR FIRST SERVICE CREDIT UNION FOR COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO BOTH CONFERENCE WITH Prophet/Plaintiff REGARDING COUNSEL'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND SAID COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO INCLUDE A CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE WITH HIS SAID MOTION AS IS REQUIRED BY TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (WERE THIS CASE BROUGHT BEFORE OUR U.S. FEDERAL DISTRICT JUDGE Sam R. Cummings, IT IS LIKELY HERE ,TOO,THAT HE WOULD HAVE ORDERED SUCH A MOTION BE STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD ON HIS OWN MOTION, PROTECTING MY RIGHTS); FOR SANCTIONS; TO COMPEL DISCOVERY; AND RESPONSE OF Prophet/Plaintiff Ronald Dwayne Whitfield TO SAID COUNSEL'S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY IN RESPONSE TO ORDER FROM ORAL HEARING ALLOWING TIME TO AMEND AFFIDAVITS TO PROVIDE JUDGE WITH THE LEGAL AUTHORITY OF U.S. SUPREME COURT'S "HOLDING" THAT ALL THESE COUNSELS HAVE BEEN IN LEGAL ERROR TO .HAVE CONTESTED IN THE FIRST PLACE SUCH AFFIDAVITS OF INDIGENCY THAT Prophet's ORIGINAL AND FIRST AMENDED AFFIDAVIT ARE SUFFICIENT ALREADY
***************************************************** rropnt::t KOllalU lJWaym: W llllllt:lU: Vlllt.:lal , \......OHgrt;SSlOlli:tl i:tUU J UU1\,;H11 ... r(lgc; 0 Ul '-tL.
ALL "LEGAL TERMS" USED HEREIN ARE TO BE UNDERSTOOD TO MEAN WHAT THEY LEGALLY MEAN; E.G, "COURT" MEANS JUST THAT, AN "INSTITUTION" VESTED WITH POWER AND THE RIGHT TO ACT WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THAT POWER, WHEREAS THE LEGAL TERM "JUDGE" MEANS A NATURAL PERSON OF FLESH AND BLOOD AUTHORIZED TO EXERCISE POWER FOR THE COURT; "FRIVOLOUS,""RENDER," "ENTER," "JUDGMENT," "SENTENCE,""CONVICTION" AND SO ON HAVE LEGAL.DEFINITIONS EITHER ESTABLISH BY CONGRESS, TEXAS LEGISLATURE OR CONSTRUED BY JUDGES AND JUSTICES ACTING FOR COURTS. *****************************************************
PREAMBLE
"[Our Greatest Prophet Ever] Jesus knew their thoughts and said to them, "Every I kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and every- city or household divided against itself will not stand.
"If Satan drives out Satan, he is divided against himself. How then can his Kingdom stand?" (Our Holy Bible.)
In Re Thoma, 873 s.w. 2d 477(Tex. Rev. Trib.1994):
Whereas a corrupt state judge divided against the corrupted legal system of the Kingdom of the State of Texas, just like Prophet Jesus stated, that kingdom will have been "ruined," and so the Kingdom of the State of Texas did cast out "former Judge Thoma."
"The record in the instant case establishes that on January 9, 1992 [which just so happened to be the same day that the State of Texas, corruptly, and, therefore, unlawfully, caused such non-signed and non-filed 'docket sheets' in a criminal lawsuit being styled 'The State of Texas v. Ronald Dwayne Whitfield, Cause No. 617718, in The 174th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas,' to reflect that I · would be illegally and criminally sued by the SAME