CLEAR FROM THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF 8 FEBRUARY 1963 CONCERNING THE FIRST INTEGRATION PROCEDURE THAT THE APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT, UNTIL THE END OF 1961, HIS SUPERIOR SUPPORTED HIM IN HIS DUTIES ON THE STAFF COMMITTEE AND THAT HE ALWAYS FOUND IT POSSIBLE TO FINISH HIS WORK WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIME-LIMITS .
IT IS CLEAR FROM THE ABOVE THAT IT WAS UNNECESSARY IN THE COURSE OF THE INTEGRATION PROCEDURE TO CONSIDER IN GREATER DEPTH THE QUESTION OF HOW MUCH TIME THE APPLICANT DEVOTED TO HIS ACTIVITIES ON THE STAFF COMMITTEE .
IT WAS THEREFORE REASONABLE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT BOARD TO REGARD THE EVIDENCE OF MR HIRSCH AS UNNECESSARY .
THE PRESENT COMPLAINT IS THEREFORE UNFOUNDED .
2 . THE SECOND SUBMISSION : ABSENCE OR INSUFFICIENCY OF GROUNDS FOR THE DECISION
( A ) THE APPLICANT CRITICIZES THE ESTABLISHMENT BOARD FOR FAILING TO TAKE THE FAVOURABLE EVIDENCE GIVEN BY MR MEDI SUFFICIENTLY INTO CONSIDERATION .
P 165
THE EVIDENCE GIVEN BY MR MEDI AT THE MEETING ON 3 NOVEMBER 1965 SHOWS THAT HE DID NOT HAVE AT HIS DISPOSAL SUFFICIENT INFORMATION CONCERNING THE APPLICANT TO ENABLE HIM TO MAKE A COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF HIS ACTIVITIES .
FOR THIS REASON, MR MEDI'S STATEMENTS COULD NOT PROVIDE THE ESTABLISHMENT BOARD WITH INFORMATION SUCH AS COULD EXERCISE A DECISIVE INFLUENCE ON THE OPINION TO BE ISSUED .
THE PRESENT COMPLAINT IS THEREFORE UNFOUNDED .
( B ) THE APPLICANT ALLEGES THAT THE ESTABLISHMENT BOARD WRONGLY CRITICIZED HIS ATTEMPTS TO PREPARE HEALTH AND WELFARE STATISTICS .
IT FOLLOWS FROM A LETTER FROM THE STATISTICAL DEPARTMENT DATED 26 JANUARY 1961 AND FROM A MEMORANDUM ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT TO THIS DEPARTMENT AND DATED 26 NOVEMBER 1961, THAT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE LACK OF PROGRESS IN THIS FIELD DID NOT LIE WITH HIM, BUT RATHER WITH THE NATIONAL AUTHORITIES INVOLVED .
IT IS CLEAR FROM THE MINUTES THAT THE APPLICANT'S EXPLANATIONS ON THIS POINT MADE IN THE COURSE OF THE INTEGRATION PROCEDURE WERE ACCEPTED AND THAT, IN ANY CASE, HIS WORK IN THE FIELD OF STATISTICS DID NOT INFLUENCE THE GENERAL ASSESSMENT MADE BY THE ESTABLISHMENT BOARD .
THE PRESENT COMPLAINT IS THEREFORE UNFOUNDED .
( C ) THE APPLICANT ALLEGES THAT THE UNFAVOURABLE ASSESSMENT OF THE ESTABLISHMENT BOARD MADE REGARDING THE DETAILED LIST OF POSTS OF THE DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH AND SAFETY WHICH HE HAD PREPARED WAS MADE ON THE BASIS OF INCOMPLETE DOCUMENTS .
THE APPLICANT HAS NOT ESTABLISHED THE EXISTENCE OF A SCHEDULE CONTAINING A RESUME OF THE STAFF REQUIRED .
MOREOVER, THE BOARD'S UNFAVOURABLE ASSESSMENT IS BASED MORE ON THE LACK OF ORIGINALITY OF THE DETAILED LIST OF POSTS THAN ON THE FACT THAT IT WAS INCOMPLETE . IT MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED THAT A DOCUMENT WHICH ONLY CONTAINS PARAPHRASES OF EXTRACTS FROM THE EAEC TREATY IS INAPPROPRIATE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT ITS AUTHOR IS CAPABLE OF PERFORMING THE DUTIES INHERENT IN THE POST OF HEAD OF DIVISION .
THE PRESENT COMPLAINT IS THEREFORE UNFOUNDED .
P . 166
( D ) THE APPLICANT ALLEGES