Commc'ns Sys. Corp.v.v. Tanner, 856 S.W.2d 725, 731 (Tex. 1993). The seekingsanctionshas the burdenof showingits right to relief.Tarmer, party seeking sanctions has the burden of showing its rightto party 856S.W.2dat Tanner, 856 S.W.2d at 731;Elkins 731; Elkinsv. Stotts-Brown,103S.W.3d664,668(Tex.App. - Dallas2003, nonopet.), v. Stotts-Brown, 103 S.W.3d 664, 668 (Tex. App. - Dallas2003, pet.).
65. Chapter10provides of pleading motionconstitutes a certificateby lv 65. Chapter 10 provides that: The signing ofaa pleadingoror motion constitutes a certificate by the that to the signatory's bestknowledge, andbelief,formedafter information, the signatory that to the signatory's best knowledge, information, and belief, formed after reasonable inquiry:(1)thepleading or motionis notbeingpresented foranyimproper reasonable inquiry: (1) the pleading or motion is not being presented for any improper purpose, includingtoharassortocause delayorneedless increaseinthecostoflitigation;(2)the including to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation; (2) the orotherlegalcontentions defenses, ormotion inthepleading byexisting iswarranted lawor claims, defenses, or other legal contentions in the pleading or motion is warranted by existing law or or reversalof existinglaw or the argumentfor the extension,modification, by a non - f`rivolous by a non-frivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the of new law; (3) the allegationsor otherfactualcontentionsin the pleadingor establishment establishment of new law; (3) the allegations or other factual contentions in the pleading or motionhaveevidentiary or,fora specifically support is or factualcontention, allegation motion have evidentiary support or, for a specifically identified allegation or factual contention, is likelyto haveevidentiary aftera reasonable for investigation likely to have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation discovery...Id. BothRules10andRule13requireproofofimproper added). (emphasis purpose, discovery...Id. (emphasis added). Both Rules 10 and Rule 13 require proof of improper purpose, maliciousintent,intentto harassor increase thecostsoflitigation,. Tex.R.Civ.P. 13,10.No malicious intent, intent to harass or increase the costs of litigation,. Tex. R. Civ. P. 13, for10. No proofofharassment or maliceexistsorcanbeshown.Sanctions maybeonlyimposed good proof of harassment or malice exists or can be shown. Sanctions may be only imposed for good causeunderRule13the particularsof whichmustbe statedin the order.Tex.R.Civ.P. 13; cause under Rule 13 the particulars of which must be stated in the order. Tex .R. Civ. P. 13; PROVED 89S.W.3dat327.Atnotimehascounsel Rudisell, thatany required to thestandard Rudisell, 89 S.W.3d at327. At no time has counsel PROVED to the standard required that any pleadingswerefiledbyPLAINTIFFS or theirATTORNEYS withtheintentto harass,mislead, pleadings were filed by PLAINTIFFS or their ATTORNEYS with the intent to harass, mislead, increasethe costsoflitigation, hasfiledeverypleading or in badfaith.Counsel ingoodfaith increase the costs of litigation, or in bad faith. Counsel has filed every pleading in good faith and inrelianceontheConstitutions oftheUnited States,Texas, Federal andState Statute, and in reliance on the Constitutions of the United States, Texas, Federal and State Statute,
Silverado Appx. 0569 No. 1-15-567-CV 1658 Rules,and/or Ethical Rules, procedural and/or procedural rulesof rules thisCourt. of this MOVANTS Court. MOVANTS have havetheburden the burdenoof fproving proving
some formof some form of malicious maliciousintent,whichthey intent, which theypatentlycannot. patently Tex.R. cannot. Civ. Tex. R. Civ.PP10, 10, 13. 13.
SCHWAGER SCHWAGERhas sentthelawsuits hassent the lawsuitsfiledin filed inthis totheTexas caseto thiscase ofAging Departmentof the Texas Department Agingand and
Disability Disability ((DADS), GeneralEElder Texas AttorneyGeneral DADS),Texas lderAbuseand