as againstillegalattemptson the part of a Board of Trusteesto oust him. The judgmentof the trial court,which was affirmed,restrainedthe Board from expendingpublicfunds for the purposeof Paying another Superintendent.The court stated: "The injunctionagainst interference by others\:!thhis pOSSeSsion of such office at least up to September1, 1936, was clearly authorized."(Underscoring OUrs.)
^. -
HonorableFred kri&an, June 14, 1939, Page 3 (O-952) HonorableFred ,kribman, June 14, 1939, Page 3 (O-952)
It is our opinionthat the Board of Trusteesmay not dispensewith the servicesof a Superintendent who has a valid contract,and order him to vacate the premises~forthwith,and the fact that the Board is willing to ;~syhim his full year'ssalary is not controlling.
Yours very truly,
ATTORNEXGENERALOF TEXAS
*I Cecil C . Cammck
By Cecil C. Camwcb Assisi;ant .., ccc :l?c* ldw
APPIIOtiD OPINICNCCMMITl!EE E C. 0. B. CHAIRMAN