IGN E Don Apr il 13th,2015.
JSI KellyM. Cross JudgePresiding
cR, p. STANDARD OF REVIEW
llantbringsthis restrictedappeal,seekingreversalandremanddueto eror. Generall speaking,a restrictedappealdirectly attacksthejudgment within six months after the udgmentwas signed,by a party to suit, who did not participatein the actual trial, an the error he complainsof is apparentfrom the face of the record. Tex. Civ. Prac.& e m.C o d e$ 5 1 .0 1 3T; ex.R. App.Pr o.26.1;Tex. v. R.App.Pr o.45;Alexander u e , I 3 4 S . W . 3 d8 4 5 , 8 4 8( T e x . 2 0 0 4 ) ;I n r e E s t a t eo f H u t c h i n s , 8 2 S 9 .W. 2d295, 97 (Tex.App.- CorpusChristi,1992)writ den. courtsignedtheOrderon April 13,2015.CR,p.29-30. Appellantfiledhis thefirst Appealon July6,2015. CR,p.35-36. Thissatisfied Noticeo Restricted element.By virtueof his beneficiaryandlegateestatus,Appellantandthe other proceeding, individ ls namedin theCodicilwerepartiesto theprobate He did not partici in the hearingand did not file any postjudgmentmotions. CR, p. 33-34. If thisCou finds the face of the record,the Order Admitting the Will to Probate void and must be remandedto the trial court for further proceedings.
ISSUES PRESEINTED
ERRORNO. ONE
THE L COURTCOMMITTEDREVERSIBLEERRORBECAUSETHEREIS NO EVI E OR PROOFTHAT THE CODICILWAS NOT ADMISSIBLETO PROBA
F ERRORNO. TWO
THE AL COURTCOMMITTEDREVERSIBLEERRORBECAUSETHEREIS NO NO CE IN ANY PLEADINGOR ELSEWHERETHAT THE CODICILWAS NOT MISSIBLETO PROBATE;THUS,THEREIS A MATERIALVARIANCE BETW TFIE PLEADINGS AND THE PROOF.
F ERRORNO. THREE
THE IAL COURTCOMMITTEDREVERSIBLEERRORIN NOT ADMITTING THEC DICIL TO PROBATEBECAUSETHE CODICILCOULDBE PROVED. POINT F ERRORNO. FOUR
THE AL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR BECAUSE THE PROOF OF FA ISERRONEOUS.
POINT F ERRORNO. FIVE
THE AL COURTCOMMITTEDREVERSIBLE ERRORBECAUSETHE PUBLIS ED ]PLEADINGAND CITATIONDO NOT REQUESTCOURTPROBATE WILL D NOT CODICIL.
POINT F ERRORNO. SIX
THE DUTY TOWARDDEVISEES UI-ORBREACHEDI-IISF'IDUCIARY LINDE THE CODICIL.
POINT F ERRORNO. SEVEN
THE E UTORCOMMITTEDFRAUD ON THE COURTAND ON THE CODICIL BENE IARIES.
NO. EIGHT POINT F ER.ROR
THE E UTORBREACHEDDUTY OF ORDINARYCARETO THE BEN IARIESOF THE CODICIL.
POINT F ERRORNO. NINE
THE AL C]OURTERREDBY NOT REQUIRINGAPPELLEETO PARTY. JOINT E APPELLANTAS A NECESSARY
DISCUSSION
POINT F ERRORNOS.ONE.TWO AND THREE
THE AL COURTCOMMiTTEDREVERSIBLEERRORBECAUSETHEREiS NO EVI ENCEOR PROOFTHAT THE CODICILWAS NOT ADMISSIBLETO PROBA E.
THE T AL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLEERROR BECAUSE THERE IS NO NO CE IN ANY PLEADINGOR ELSEWHERE THAT THE CODICILWAS NOT MISSIBLETO A MATERIAL VARIANCE BETW T]F{EPLEADINGSAND THE PROOF. THE AL COURTCOMMITTEDREVERSIBLEERRORIN NOT ADMITTING THE DICIL TO PROBATEBECAUSETHE CODICILCOULDBE PROVED.
pafty may appeala finaljudgmentto the courl of appealsby petitionfor writ of
errorby mplying with the requirementsset forth below:
(a) iling Petition.The party desiringto sueout a writ of error shall file with the clerkof he courl in which the judgment was rendereda written petition signedby him or by his rnev. and addressedto the clerk.
o ParticipatingParty at Trial. No party who participateseither in personor by his in the actualtrial of the casein the trial court shall be entitledto review by the co of appealsthrough meansof writ of error.
(c) equisitesof Petition. The petition shall statethe namesand residencesof the parties versely interested,shall describethejudgment with sufficient