tie legal oonsequencesof hle crime and of his oonvlo~t5on,dire& and collateral,includingthe punishment,whether of imprison- ment, peouniwy penalty,or whateverelse the law has provided. l~ish. Cr. Law, I 916. Partial,where it remits only a por- tion of the punishment,or absolveefraa only a portionof the legal oonsequenoesof the crime. Conditional, where It does not beocme operativeuntil the granteehas performedscme speoifiedaot, or where It beoomeavoid when some specified event transpires. 1Bieh. Or. Iaw, fl914.' . . . Could the meaning of the act of the Thirty-seoond Leglelaturebe more clearlyexpreesed, and what does this sot of the Isglelature attemptor proposeto do but exempt a man frcaathe punish- ment asaeesed againsthim for a crime he has ocmrmltted,upon the sole grouud that he go and sin no more? It has no other object,purposeor effeot,aud by giving It a differentnsk or designationdoes not change its legalmeaning or eff~t, . . .*
It thus was held in the Snodgrassease, that the law attemptingto conferupon the judgesof the districtcourts in certainfelony oases, the dis- cretionarypower to imposesuspendedsentences,oonditlonedthat the person convictedshouldnot within a perioddouble the term of imprismt assessed be conviatedof any other felony,was unconstitutional and void.
In the Eelson oaBe, the Court had under considerationthe meaning and effectof Articles1057a and 105'7b, Vern. Ann. Code of CriminalProoedure, 1922 Supp. (Aots 1911, p. 64). Theme provisionswere oarrledforwardwithout materialohange as Articles959 an8 960, Code of CriminalProcedure,1925. Article 1057a,supra,provided:
"Meritoriousprisonerswho ere now or may hereafterbe in prisonunder a sentenceto penal servitudemay be allowed to go upon parole,outsideof the buildingend jurisdiction of the penitentiaryauthoritiessubjectto the provlsions of this act, and to suoh regulationaand conditionsas may .
honorable c. H. cavness, page 8 (o-7256)
be made by the board of prim% camiesimer%, -wit&'&a approvalof the Governorof this state,and splehparoLe shall be made only by the governor,or with his apprcm:.."
~rtia3 1057-b, SUPP~, p20~fdd that padba pri5~~~m3 ~kl~ti;j. remainunder custodyand controlof the Board of Prison @onnafsai.omre, subjectto retakingby the Board aa uPader+&e origInalsentence,%A mei!. retakfagshall be at the directionof the Covernor*.
The Court9 speakirng throUegr Jmtioe Morrow, said:
%o%b in the passageof the law mentionedand the makfrngof the proclamationreferredto there, is ~onta5ned a recognitioznof the femt that the abridment and mdffL- oaf&m 0P the terms of imprisonmentoontamplatadare refer- able to the authoritytm exerciseexemtive clemencytiieh is conferredupon the Governorof the state In ,theeons,t:- tutioml provisionmentioned.* . .
"It is not within the power of the LegfsWme t enlargeor t0 restrfctthe p&mlsg power vested in ,%a:* execut%ve,n0r to imposeeonditiom upornwhich ft my b's exercised,nor requirementstomhing the eonditims pm- cedent or submquent which are to be imposedby tie eY'eon= tive upon the emviot, and the aetm mentioneddo not p&r- port to do 80. 9 . .
"Our view of the Paw a8 it relate8to the &&zant, 0888 is that smh privilegesas the relatorenJo& m8er the faots &ate& do no% arise frm the parole law mmtQmed, but reet upon the power of executiveclemencyseat& I??the Governor;that at the the of hi8 arresthe wea no';5s~tie penitentiary, nor did there exist in the penitent:.apg a~'&- oritiesany ri@%t or peer to mbjeot h3m to ~pris~mmen4,