witnesses'testimony Any allegedinconsistencies SeeLanconv. State, concernthe credibilityandweightto be giventheir testimony,, 253 S.W.3d 699,705-07(Tex.Crim. App. 2008).To the extentthe testimonyis inconsistent,thejury, asthe trier of fact, had the ultimateauthLority to determine the credibilityof witnessesandthe weightto be givento their testimony.SeeTex. (Tex.Crim. CodeCrim.Proc.art.38.04;Garciav.State,919S.W.2d370,,382n.6 in the evidenceshouldbe resolvedin favor of the App. 1996).Any inconsistencies jury's verdictin a sufficiencyreview.Morenov. State,755S.W.2d866,867 (Tex. Crim.App. 1988);Draperv. State,335S.W.3d 412,415(Te>r. App.-Houston [14thDist.] 2}tl,pet. refld).
Consideringall of the evidencein the light rrlostfavorableto the verdict, we conclude the evidence is sufficient to support rtlrejury's implicit rejection of, appellant'sclaim of self-defenr..Wr ovemrleappellant'ssecondissue.
Having overruledall of appellant'schallengeson appeal,we affirm the trial court'sjudgment.
lsl KemfihompsonFrost ChiefJlustice
Panelconsistsof Chief JusticeFrost and JusticesC[ristopher andDonovan. Do Not Publish- Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).