becausethisoffensenecessarilyincludestheintent
togratifyadesireforpleasureorexcitem asanelem Statev. Kissinger, 922S.W.2d482, 489(Tenn. 1996); seealsoState ent ent.
v. W , 958S.W.2d724, 73 n (T n. 1 7). A s h, fa r (7) is n a a licab e an m t fac intheca at b alton 0 .6 en 99 s uc cto ot n pp le nh ce en tor se ar.
Thedefendant challeng thetrial co ap tionof fa r (11),that thefelonyresultedinbodilyinjury and es urt's plica cto
thedefendant haspreviouslybeenconvictedofafelonythat resultedindeathor bodilyinjury. Asthereis noproof intherecord
that thedefendant haspreviouslybeenconvictedofafelonythat resultedindeathor bodilyinjury, thisfactorisalsoinapplicable.
Thedefenda next challengesthetrial court'sapplicationoffactor(16), that thecrim wascom ittedunder nt e m
circumstances under which the potential for bodily injury to a victimwas great. The defendant contends that this factor is an
essential elem ofaggravatedsexual battery andthereforeinapplicableasane ha ce e t fa r. A thedefendant wasfound ent n n m n cto s
The presentence report does indicate that the defendant has been convicted of aggravated assault and armed robbery. However, the record is devoid of any evidence indicating that these felonies involved death or bodily injury.
guiltyof thechargedoffenseof sexual battery onthe grounds that heengagedinsexual contact withthevictimandcausedbodily
injury toher, weagreethat factor(16)isinapplicableinthiscase.
Thesentencingrange for aggravated se battery, a Class B felony, underRangeI isnot lessthaneight xual
nor m than twelve years. T.C.A. § 40-35-112(a)(2). The trial court sentenced the defendant to the twelve year m mu ore axi m
sentence. Them fact that thetrial court erroneouslyappliedenhancementfactors doesnot entitlethedefendanttoareduction ere
in his sentence. State v. Lavender, 967 S.W.2d 803, 809 (Tenn. 1998). The record supports the application of enhancement
factors (1), (4), and(5) tothedefendant'ssentenceandtherearenoapplicablemitigating factors. W findthesefactors tobe e
sufficien to s po these nc im se b th tria co t up rt nte e po d y e l urt.
Accordingly, thedefendant'sconvictionandsentenceareaffirmed.
_________________________________ J H H P A , J dg ON . EY u e
CNU: OCR
_________________________________ JOEG RILEY,Judge .
_________________________________ JAM C BEA , SR., Special Judge ES . SLEY