There was no error in tbe charge of tbe court, that tbe defendant was not entitled to notice of tbe non-payment of tbe order - Wright vs. Shorter, 56th Ga. Rep. 72 - and that being so, tbe court did not err in sustaining tbe objections to tbe questions propounded to tbe witness, Martin. The evidence is that tbe order was not paid within eighteen months from tbe 20th of March, 1872, tbe date thereof, and that there bad been no money in tbe treasury of Russell county subject to tbe payment of said order, from tbe time of its sale to plaintiff until the time of trial.
3. This was a liquidated demand to tbe extent of tbe face of tbe order, which tbe defendant promised to pay, and it became due and payable, according to its legal effect, eighteen months from tbe date thereof, and tbe plaintiff was entitled to interest thereon from that date. Code §2056.
There was no error in tbe charge of the court as to tbe question of interest.
Let tbe judgment of tbe court below be affirmed.