Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 991

1144 

OCTOBER TERM, 2009 

January 19, 2010 

558 U. S. 

ther consideration in light of the position asserted by the Solicitor 
General  in  her  brief  for  the  United  States  ﬁled  on  November  25, 
2009.  Reported  below:  559  F.  3d  1188. 

No.  09–5370.  Vazquez  v.  United  States.  C.  A.  11th  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis 
granted.  Certiorari  granted,  judgment  vacated,  and  case  re­
manded  for  further  consideration  in  light  of  the  position  asserted 
by  the  Solicitor  General  in  her  brief  for  the  United  States  ﬁled 
on  November  16,  2009.  Reported  below:  558  F.  3d  1224. 

No.  09–5995.  Johnson  v.  United  States.  C.  A.  8th  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis 
granted.  Certiorari  granted,  judgment  vacated,  and  case  re­
manded  for  further  consideration  in  light  of  Abuelhawa  v.  United 
States,  556  U. S.  816  (2009).  Reported  below:  561  F.  3d  864. 

No.  09–7408.  Linton  v.  United  States.  C.  A.  4th  Cir.  Mo­
tion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. 
Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for fur­
ther  consideration  in  light  of  United  States  v.  Booker,  543  U. S. 
220  (2005). 

Certiorari  Dismissed 

No.  09–7452.  Slezak  v.  Glover  et  al.  C.  A.  4th  Cir.  Mo­
tion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied, 
and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  Reported 
below:  326  Fed.  Appx.  236. 

No. 09–7461.  Ghee v.  Target National Bank.  Ct. App. Ga. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  de­
nied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No.  09–7498.  Hon  Lau  v.  Brown,  Attorney  General  of 
California.  C.  A.  9th  Cir.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to 
proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed.  See 
this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No.  09–7499.  Hon  Lau  v.  Adams,  Warden.  C.  A.  9th  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  de­
nied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No.  09–7537.  Adamson  v.  McNeil,  Secretary,  Florida  De­
partment  of  Corrections.  Dist.  Ct.  App.  Fla.,  1st  Dist.  Mo­