Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 953.0

1106 

OCTOBER TERM, 2009 

January 11, 2010 

558 U. S. 

petitioner  unless  the  docketing  fee  required  by  Rule  38(a)  is  paid 
and  the  petition  is  submitted  in  compliance  with  Rule  33.1.  See 
Martin  v.  District  of  Columbia  Court  of  Appeals,  506  U. S.  1 
(1992)  (per  curiam).  Justice  Stevens  dissents.  See  id.,  at  4, 
and  cases  cited  therein.  Reported  below:  17  So.  3d  376. 

No.  09–7282.  Karnofel  v.  Beck  et  al.  Ct.  App.  Ohio, 
Trumbull  County.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in 
forma  pauperis  denied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this 
Court’s  Rule  39.8.  As  petitioner  has  repeatedly  abused  this 
Court’s  process,  the  Clerk  is  directed  not  to  accept  any  further 
petitions  in  noncriminal  matters  from  petitioner  unless  the  dock­
eting  fee  required  by  Rule  38(a)  is  paid  and  the  petition  is  sub­
mitted  in  compliance  with  Rule  33.1.  See  Martin  v.  District  of 
Columbia  Court  of  Appeals,  506  U. S.  1  (1992)  (per  curiam). 
Justice Stevens dissents.  See id., at 4, and cases cited therein. 
No.  09–7307.  Zani  v.  Social  Security  Administration. 
C. A. 4th Cir.  Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma 
pauperis  denied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule 
39.8.  Reported  below:  323  Fed.  Appx.  286. 

No. 09–7384.  Clark v.  California.  Sup. Ct. Cal.  Motion of 
petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and 
certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  As  petitioner 
has  repeatedly  abused  this  Court’s  process,  the  Clerk  is  directed 
not  to  accept  any  further  petitions  in  noncriminal  matters  from 
petitioner  unless  the  docketing  fee  required  by  Rule  38(a)  is  paid 
and  the  petition  is  submitted  in  compliance  with  Rule  33.1.  See 
Martin  v.  District  of  Columbia  Court  of  Appeals,  506  U. S.  1 
(1992)  (per  curiam).  Justice  Stevens  dissents.  See  id.,  at  4, 
and  cases  cited  therein. 

No.  09–7418.  Hon  Lau  v.  Hernandez,  Warden,  et  al. 
C. A. 9th Cir.  Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma 
pauperis  denied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule 
39.8. 

No.  09–7419.  Hon  Lau  v.  Evans,  Warden.  C.  A.  9th  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  de­
nied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No.  09–7423.  White  v.  Workman,  Warden.  C.  A.  11th  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  de­
nied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.