Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/19pdf/18-1195_g314.pdf
Page Number: 61

6 

ESPINOZA v. MONTANA DEPT. OF REVENUE 

GINSBURG, J., dissenting 

boat—this  Court  had  no  occasion  to  address  the  matter.2 
On that sole ground, and reaching no other issue, I dissent 
from the Court’s judgment. 

—————— 

2  The  Montana  Supreme  Court’s  decision  leaves  parents  where  they
would  be  had the  State  never  enacted  a  scholarship  program.    In  that 
event, no one would argue that Montana was obliged to provide such a 
program solely for parents who send their children to religious schools. 
But  cf.  ante,  at  13  (ALITO,  J.,  concurring)  (inapt  reference  to  Anatole 
France’s remark).