Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 922.0

ORDERS 

1075 

558 U. S. 

December 7, 2009 

to  dispense  with  printing  the  joint  appendix  granted.  Justice 
Sotomayor  took  no  part  in  the  consideration  or  decision  of  this 
petition. 

No.  09–5327.  Holland  v.  Florida.  C.  A.  11th  Cir. 

[Certio­
rari  granted,  ante,  p.  945.]  Motion  of  petitioner  for  appointment 
of  counsel  granted.  Todd  G.  Scher,  Esq.,  of  Miami  Beach,  Fla.,  is 
appointed  to  serve  as  counsel  for  petitioner  in  this  case. 

No.  09–5768.  In  re  Miller.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  recon­
sideration  of  order  denying  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis 
[ante,  p.  813]  denied. 

No.  09–6525.  Genevier  v.  Superior  Court  of  California, 
Los Angeles County, et al.  Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist.  Mo­
tion  of  petitioner  for  reconsideration  of  order  denying  leave  to 
proceed  in  forma  pauperis  [ante,  p.  967]  denied. 

No.  09–6684.  Howard  v.  United  States  District  Court 
for  the  Southern  District  of  Ohio  et  al.  C.  A.  D.  C.  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  reconsideration  of  order  denying  leave  to 
proceed  in  forma  pauperis  [ante,  p.  985]  denied. 

No.  09–6732.  Rogers  v.  KBR  Technical  Services,  Inc. 

C.  A.  5th  Cir.;  and 

No.  09–6765.  McGore  v.  Birkett,  Warden.  C.  A.  6th  Cir. 
Motions  of  petitioners  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis 
denied.  Petitioners  are  allowed  until  December  28,  2009,  within 
which  to  pay  the  docketing  fees  required  by  Rule  38(a)  and  to 
submit  petitions  in  compliance  with  Rule  33.1  of  the  Rules  of 
this  Court. 

No.  09–7290.  In  re  Al-Ghizzawi; 
No.  09–7454.  In  re  Miller;  and 
No.  09–7511.  In  re  Bromell.  Petitions  for  writs  of  habeas 

corpus  denied. 

No.  09–7470.  In  re  Armstrong.  Motion  of  petitioner  for 
leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and  petition  for  writ 
of habeas corpus dismissed.  See this Court’s Rule 39.8.  Justice 
Sotomayor  took  no  part  in  the  consideration  or  decision  of  this 
petition. 

No.  09–6857.  In  re  Bivens.  Petition  for  writ  of  mandamus 

denied.