Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 868.0

ORDERS 

1021 

558 U. S. 

November  16,  2009 

Certiorari  Granted—Reversed and  Remanded. 

(See No.  08–1263, 

ante,  p.  15.) 

Certiorari  Dismissed 

No.  09–6447.  Cohen  v.  Syme  et  al.  Ct.  App.  Ariz.  Motion 
of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and 
certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No. 09–6459.  Spurlock v.  Bank of America, N. A.  Cir. Ct. 
Wayne  County,  W. Va.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed 
in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this 
Court’s  Rule  39.8.  As  petitioner  has  repeatedly  abused  this 
Court’s  process,  the  Clerk  is  directed  not  to  accept  any  further 
petitions  in  noncriminal  matters  from  petitioner  unless  the  dock­
eting  fee  required  by  Rule  38(a)  is  paid  and  the  petition  is  sub­
mitted  in  compliance  with  Rule  33.1.  See  Martin  v.  District  of 
Columbia  Court  of  Appeals,  506  U. S.  1  (1992)  (per  curiam). 
Justice Stevens dissents.  See id., at 4, and cases cited therein. 

No.  09–6554.  Plummer  v.  California.  Sup.  Ct.  Cal.  Mo­
tion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied, 
and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  As  peti­
tioner  has  repeatedly  abused  this  Court’s  process,  the  Clerk  is 
directed  not  to  accept  any  further  petitions  in  noncriminal  mat­
ters  from  petitioner  unless  the  docketing  fee  required  by  Rule 
38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 
33.1.  See  Martin  v.  District  of  Columbia  Court  of  Appeals,  506 
U. S.  1  (1992)  (per  curiam).  Justice  Stevens  dissents.  See 
id.,  at  4,  and  cases  cited  therein. 

No.  09–6586.  Smith  v.  Knight,  Superintendent,  Pendle­
ton  Correctional  Facility.  Ct.  App.  Ind.  Motion  of  peti­
tioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and  certio­
rari dismissed.  See this Court’s Rule 39.8.  Reported below: 908 
N.  E.  2d  1277. 

Miscellaneous  Orders 

No.  09M46.  Daniel  v.  Trans  Union  Consumer  Reporting. 
Motion  to  direct  the  Clerk  to  ﬁle  petition  for  writ  of  certiorari 
out  of  time  denied.