Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/17pdf/16-980_f2q3.pdf
Page Number: 53

26 

HUSTED v. A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE 

BREYER, J., dissenting 
Appendix B to opinion of BREYER, J. 

“SEC.  903.    CLARIFICATION  OF  ABILITY  OF  ELECTION 
OFFICIALS  TO  REMOVE  REGISTRANTS  FROM  OFFICIAL 
LIST  OF  VOTERS  ON  GROUNDS  OF  CHANGE  OF 
RESIDENCE. 
  “Section 8(b)(2) of the National Voter Registration Act of 
1993 . . . is amended by striking the period at the end and 
inserting  the  following:  ‘‘,  except  that  nothing  in  this 
paragraph  may  be  construed  to  prohibit  a  State  from 
using the procedures described in subsections (c) and (d) to 
remove an individual from the official list of eligible voters 
if the individual— 

‘‘(A)  has  not  either  notified  the  applicable  registrar  (in 
person  or  in  writing)  or  responded  during  the  period  de-
scribed  in  subparagraph  (B)  to  the  notice  sent  by  the 
applicable registrar; and then 

‘‘(B)  has  not  voted  or  appeared  to  vote  in  2  or  more 
consecutive  general  elections  for  Federal  office.’’    Id.,  at 
1728. 

“SEC. 906.  NO EFFECT ON OTHER LAWS. 
  “(a)  IN  GENERAL.—  . . .  [N]othing  in  this  Act  may  be 
construed to authorize or require conduct prohibited under 
any of the following laws, or to supersede, restrict, or limit 
the application of such laws [including]: 

. 

  . 

  . 
  “(4)  The  National  Voter  Registration  Act  of  1993.”    Id., 
at 1729. 

  . 

  .