Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/19pdf/19a1070_08l1.pdf
Page Number: 24

12 

CALVARY CHAPEL DAYTON VALLEY v. SISOLAK 

KAVANAUGH, J., dissenting 

and gyms—entail people congregating in large groups or re-
maining in close proximity for extended periods of time.  In 
any event, the State has not yet supplied a sufficient justi-
fication for its counterintuitive distinction. 

* 

* 

* 
  The  Constitution  “protects  religious  observers  against 
unequal  treatment.”    Trinity  Lutheran,  582  U. S.,  at  ___ 
(slip  op.,  at  6)  (internal  quotation  marks  and  alterations 
omitted).  Nevada’s 50-person attendance cap on religious 
worship  services  puts  praying  at  churches,  synagogues, 
temples, and mosques on worse footing than eating at res-
taurants, drinking at bars, gambling at casinos, or biking 
at gyms.  In other words, Nevada is discriminating against 
religion.  And because the State has not offered a sufficient 
justification  for  doing  so,  that  discrimination  violates  the 
First Amendment.  I would grant the Church’s application 
for a temporary injunction.  I respectfully dissent.