Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 935

1088 

OCTOBER TERM, 2009 

December 14, 2009 

558 U. S. 

rari dismissed.  See this Court’s Rule 39.8.  Justice Sotomayor 
took  no  part  in  the  consideration  or  decision  of  this  petition. 

No.  09–6943.  Humphrey  v.  Onondaga  County  Sheriff’s 
Department  et  al.  C.  A.  2d  Cir.  Motion  of  petitioner  for 
leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and  certiorari  dis­
missed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  As  petitioner  has  repeat­
edly  abused  this  Court’s  process,  the  Clerk  is  directed  not  to 
accept  any  further  petitions  in  noncriminal  matters  from  peti­
tioner  unless  the docketing  fee  required  by  Rule  38(a) is  paid  and 
the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1.  See Mar­
tin  v.  District  of  Columbia  Court  of  Appeals,  506  U. S.  1  (1992) 
(per  curiam).  Justice  Stevens  dissents.  See  id.,  at  4,  and 
cases  cited  therein. 

No.  09–7123.  Pannell  v.  Penfold  et  al.  Ct.  App.  Ind. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  de­
nied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No.  09–7149.  Millen  v.  National  Collegiate  Athletic 
Assn.  et  al.  C.  A.  7th  Cir.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to 
proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed.  See 
this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No. 09–7160.  Millen v.  Commercial Appeal.  C. A. 6th Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  de­
nied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  As 
petitioner  has  repeatedly  abused  this  Court’s  process,  the  Clerk 
is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal mat­
ters  from  petitioner  unless  the  docketing  fee  required  by  Rule 
38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 
33.1.  See  Martin  v.  District  of  Columbia  Court  of  Appeals,  506 
U. S.  1  (1992)  (per  curiam).  Justice  Stevens  dissents.  See 
id.,  at  4,  and  cases  cited  therein. 

No.  09–7260.  Reynoso  v.  Rock,  Superintendent,  Great 
Meadow  Correctional  Facility.  C.  A.  2d  Cir.  Motion  of 
petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and 
certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No. 09–7398.  Swendra v.  Colorado.  Ct. App. Colo.  Motion 
of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and 
certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.