Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/19-896_2135.pdf
Page Number: 13

10 

JOHNSON v. ARTEAGA-MARTINEZ 

Opinion of the Court 

proceedings tend to take, his removal is not reasonably fore-
seeable.  See Brief for Respondent 19–22.  The Government 
disagrees  on  the  merits  and  adds  that  the  issue  is  not 
properly before this Court because it would alter the scope
of the judgment below, which granted Arteaga-Martinez a
bond  hearing,  not  release.  See  Reply  Brief  11–12  (citing 
Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Thurston, 469 U. S. 111, 119, 
n. 14 (1985)).  Again, we decline to reach this claim in the
first instance.  See Cutter, 544 U. S., at 718, n. 7. 

* 

* 
The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Third Cir-
cuit is reversed, and the case is remanded for further pro-
ceedings consistent with this opinion. 

* 

It is so ordered.