Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/20-979_h3ci.pdf
Page Number: 4.0

4 

PATEL v. GARLAND 

Syllabus 

of §1252(a)(2)(B)(i) clearly indicate that judicial review of fact determi-
nations is precluded in the discretionary-relief context, and the Court
has no reason to resort to the presumption of reviewability.  P. 17. 

971 F. 3d 1258, affirmed. 

BARRETT,  J.,  delivered  the  opinion  of  the  Court,  in  which  ROBERTS, 
C. J.,  and  THOMAS,  ALITO,  and  KAVANAUGH,  JJ.,  joined.    GORSUCH,  J., 
filed a dissenting opinion, in which BREYER, SOTOMAYOR, and KAGAN, JJ., 
joined.