Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/22pdf/21-468_5if6.pdf
Page Number: 50

10 

NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS COUNCIL v. ROSS 

Opinion of ROBERTS, C. J. 

commerce.  See  ante,  at  2  (opinion  of  BARRETT,  J.)  (“The
complaint plausibly alleges that Proposition 12’s costs are 
pervasive, burdensome, and will be felt primarily (but not 
exclusively) outside California.”). 

* 

* 

* 
In my view, petitioners plausibly allege a substantial bur-
den against interstate commerce.  I would therefore remand 
the case for the Ninth Circuit to decide whether it is plau-
sible that the “burden . . . is clearly excessive in relation to 
the putative local benefits.”  Pike, 397 U. S., at 142.