Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 952.0

ORDERS 

1105 

558 U. S. 

January 11, 2010 

No.  09–7060.  Eline  v.  Lara  et  al.  C.  A.  9th  Cir.  Motion 
of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and 
certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No.  09–7112.  Jackson  v.  Minnesota.  Ct.  App.  Minn.  Mo­
tion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied, 
and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No.  09–7143.  Sweed  v.  Lnu  et  al.  C.  A.  5th  Cir.  Motion 
of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and 
certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  As  petitioner 
has  repeatedly  abused  this  Court’s  process,  the  Clerk  is  directed 
not  to  accept  any  further  petitions  in  noncriminal  matters  from 
petitioner  unless  the  docketing  fee  required  by  Rule  38(a)  is  paid 
and  the  petition  is  submitted  in  compliance  with  Rule  33.1.  See 
Martin  v.  District  of  Columbia  Court  of  Appeals,  506  U. S.  1 
(1992)  (per  curiam).  Justice  Stevens  dissents.  See  id.,  at  4, 
and  cases  cited  therein. 

No.  09–7147.  Muniz  v.  Marshall,  Warden.  Sup.  Ct.  N.  M. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  de­
nied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  As 
petitioner  has  repeatedly  abused  this  Court’s  process,  the  Clerk 
is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal mat­
ters  from  petitioner  unless  the  docketing  fee  required  by  Rule 
38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 
33.1.  See  Martin  v.  District  of  Columbia  Court  of  Appeals,  506 
U. S.  1  (1992)  (per  curiam).  Justice  Stevens  dissents.  See 
id.,  at  4,  and  cases  cited  therein. 

No.  09–7186.  Hon  Chung  Lau  v.  Shumsky.  C.  A.  9th  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  de­
nied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No. 09–7220.  Plummer v.  Sullivan, Warden.  C. A. 9th Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  de­
nied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  Re­
ported  below:  324  Fed.  Appx.  633. 

No.  09–7266.  Parker  v.  Louisiana.  Sup.  Ct.  La.  Motion  of 
petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and 
certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  As  petitioner 
has  repeatedly  abused  this  Court’s  process,  the  Clerk  is  directed 
not  to  accept  any  further  petitions  in  noncriminal  matters  from