Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 658

ORDERS 

811 

558  U. S. 

October  5,  2009 

No.  08–1458.  Missouri  Gas  Energy  v.  Schmidt,  Woods 

County,  Oklahoma,  Assessor.  Sup.  Ct.  Okla.;  and 

No.  08–1515.  Golden  Gate  Restaurant  Assn.  v.  City  and 
County  of  San  Francisco,  California,  et  al.  C.  A.  9th  Cir. 
The  Solicitor  General  is  invited  to  ﬁle  briefs  in  these  cases  ex­
pressing  the  views  of  the  United  States. 

No.  08–1596.  Rhine  v.  Deaton  et  ux.  Ct.  App.  Tex.,  2d 
Dist.  The  Solicitor  General  of  Texas  is  invited  to  ﬁle  a  brief  in 
this  case  expressing  the  views  of  the  State  of  Texas. 

No.  08–7412.  Graham  v.  Florida.  Dist.  Ct.  App.  Fla.,  1st 
Dist. 
[Certiorari  granted,  556  U. S.  1220.]  Motion  of  petitioner 
for  appointment  of  counsel  granted.  Bryan  S.  Gowdy,  Esq.,  of 
Jacksonville,  Fla.,  is  appointed  to  serve  as  counsel  for  petitioner 
in  this  case. 

No.  08–8224.  Burke  v.  Aniskovich  et  al.  C.  A.  2d  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  reconsideration  of  order  denying  leave  to 
proceed  in  forma  pauperis  [556  U. S.  1150]  denied. 

No. 08–9547.  In re Minnfee.  Motion of petitioner for recon­
sideration  of  order  denying  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis 
[556  U. S.  1268]  denied. 

No.  08–9603.  In  re  Haddad.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  recon­
sideration  of  order  denying  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis 
[556  U. S.  1281]  denied. 

No.  08–9685.  Veale  et  al.  v.  United  States  et  al.  C.  A. 
1st Cir.  Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying 
leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  [556  U. S.  1256]  denied. 

No.  08–9822.  Bagley  v.  South  Carolina.  Sup.  Ct.  S.  C. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  reconsideration  of  order  denying  leave  to 
proceed  in  forma  pauperis  [557  U. S.  902]  granted.  Order  en­
tered  June  15,  2009,  vacated. 

No.  08–10258.  Hayes  v.  United  States.  C.  A.  Fed.  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  reconsideration  of  order  denying  leave  to 
proceed  in  forma  pauperis  [557  U. S.  917]  denied. 

No.  08–10306.  In  re  Farley.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  recon­
sideration  of  order  denying  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis 
[556  U. S.  1280]  denied.