Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 857.0

1010 

OCTOBER TERM, 2009 

November 9, 2009 

558 U. S. 

No.  09M45.  Hoffart  v.  Herman  et  al.  Motion  for  leave  to 

proceed  as  a  veteran  denied. 

No.  132, Orig.  Alabama  et al.  v.  North Carolina.  Motion 
of  the  Solicitor  General  for  leave  to  participate  in  oral  argument 
as  amicus  curiae  and  for  divided  argument  granted.  Motion  of 
the  parties  for  enlargement  of  time  for  oral  argument  granted 
and time allocated as follows: 30 minutes for plaintiffs, 10 minutes 
for the Solicitor General, 40 minutes for defendant, and 10 minutes 
for  plaintiffs. 

[For  earlier  order  herein,  see  ante,  p.  944.] 

No. 08–240.  Mac’s Shell Service, Inc., et al. v.  Shell Oil 

Products  Co.  LLC  et  al.;  and 

No.  08–372.  Shell  Oil  Products  Co.  LLC  et  al.  v.  Mac’s 
Shell Service, Inc., et al.  C. A. 1st Cir. 
[Certiorari granted, 
557 U. S. 903.]  Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to partic­
ipate  in  oral  argument  as  amicus  curiae  and  for  divided  argu­
ment  granted. 

No.  08–304.  Graham  County  Soil  and  Water  Conserva­
tion District et al. v.  United States ex rel. Wilson.  C.  A. 
4th Cir. 
[Certiorari granted, 557 U. S. 918.]  Motion of the Solici­
tor  General  for  leave  to  participate  in  oral  argument  as  amicus 
curiae  and  for  divided  argument  granted. 

No.  08–905.  Merck  &  Co.,  Inc.,  et  al.  v.  Reynolds  et  al. 
C. A. 3d Cir. 
[Certiorari granted, 556 U. S. 1257.]  Motion of the 
Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as ami­
cus  curiae  and  for  divided  argument  granted. 

No.  08–1175.  Florida  v.  Powell.  Sup.  Ct.  Fla. 

[Certiorari 
granted,  557  U. S.  918.]  Motion  of  the  Solicitor  General  for  leave 
to  participate  in  oral  argument  as  amicus  curiae  and  for  divided 
argument  granted. 

No. 08–1214.  Granite Rock Co. v. International Brother­
hood of Teamsters et al.  C. A. 9th Cir. 
[Certiorari granted, 
557  U. S.  933.]  Motion  of  respondents  for  divided  argument 
granted. 

No.  09–400.  Staub  v.  Proctor  Hospital.  C.  A.  7th  Cir. 
The Solicitor General is invited to ﬁle a brief in this case express­
ing  the  views  of  the  United  States. 

No.  09–5096.  Howard  v.  Industrial  Commission  of  Ohio 
et  al.  Sup.  Ct.  Ohio.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  reconsideration