Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 790

ORDERS 

943 

558 U. S. 

October 13, 2009 

No.  09–5789.  Sibley  v.  United  States  Court  of  Appeals 
for the District of Columbia Circuit.  C. A. D. C. Cir.  Mo­
tion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied, 
and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  Reported 
below:  564  F.  3d  1335. 

No. 09–5861.  Carbin v.  Bennett et al.  C. A. 6th Cir.  Mo­
tion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied, 
and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  As  peti­
tioner  has  repeatedly  abused  this  Court’s  process,  the  Clerk  is 
directed  not  to  accept  any  further  petitions  in  noncriminal  mat­
ters  from  petitioner  unless  the  docketing  fee  required  by  Rule 
38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 
33.1.  See  Martin  v.  District  of  Columbia  Court  of  Appeals,  506 
U. S.  1  (1992)  (per  curiam).  Justice  Stevens  dissents.  See 
id.,  at  4,  and  cases  cited  therein. 

No.  09–5885.  Sibley  v.  Florida  Bar  et  al.  C.  A.  11th  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  de­
nied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No.  09–5889.  Smith  v.  Huckins.  Ct.  App.  Ind.  Motion  of 
petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and 
certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  Reported 
below:  904  N.  E.  2d  728. 

No.  09–5899.  Soto  v.  Birkett et  al.  C.  A.  6th  Cir.  Motion 
of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and 
certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No. 09–5920.  Farris v.  Whaley et al.  C. A. 11th Cir.  Mo­
tion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied, 
and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  Reported 
below:  330  Fed.  Appx.  833. 

Miscellaneous  Orders 

No.  09A165.  Hall  v.  Goddard,  Attorney  General  of  Ari­
zona,  et  al.  C.  A.  9th  Cir.  Application  for  stay,  addressed  to 
Justice  Sotomayor  and  referred  to  the  Court,  denied. 

No. D–2453.  In re Disbarment of Sutley.  Disbarment en­

tered. 

[For  earlier  order  herein,  see  557  U. S.  948.] 

No.  D–2456.  In  re  Disbarment  of  Feinman.  Disbarment 
[For  earlier  order  herein,  see  557  U. S.  948.] 

entered.