Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/19pdf/18-1195_g314.pdf
Page Number: 3

Cite as:  591 U. S. ____ (2020) 

3 

Syllabus 

basis for invalidating the program.  The Court was obligated to disre-
gard the no-aid provision and decide this case consistent with the Fed-
eral Constitution.  Pp. 20–22. 

393 Mont. 446, 435 P. 3d 603, reversed and remanded. 

ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which THOMAS, 
ALITO, GORSUCH, and KAVANAUGH, JJ., joined.  THOMAS, J., filed a con-
curring opinion, in which GORSUCH, J., joined.  ALITO, J., and GORSUCH, 
J., filed concurring opinions.  GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in 
which KAGAN, J., joined.  BREYER, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which 
KAGAN, J., joined as to Part I.  SOTOMAYOR, J., filed a dissenting opinion.