Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 652

ORDERS 

805 

558  U. S. 

October  5,  2009 

No.  09–5055.  Fenlon  v.  Thaler,  Director,  Texas  Depart­
ment  of Criminal  Justice,  Correctional Institutions  Divi­
sion.  C.  A.  5th  Cir.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed 
in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this 
Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No.  09–5074.  Wakefield  v.  Cordis  Corp.  C.  A.  11th  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  de­
nied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  Re­
ported  below:  304  Fed.  Appx.  804. 

No.  09–5078.  Jerry  v.  Pennsylvania.  Super.  Ct.  Pa.  Mo­
tion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied, 
and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  As  peti­
tioner  has  repeatedly  abused  this  Court’s  process,  the  Clerk  is 
directed  not  to  accept  any  further  petitions  in  noncriminal  mat­
ters  from  petitioner  unless  the  docketing  fee  required  by  Rule 
38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 
33.1.  See  Martin  v.  District  of  Columbia  Court  of  Appeals,  506 
U. S.  1  (1992)  (per  curiam).  Justice  Stevens  dissents.  See 
id., at  4, and  cases cited  therein.  Reported below:  964 A.  2d 943. 
No.  09–5096.  Howard  v.  Industrial  Commission  of  Ohio 
et  al.  Sup.  Ct.  Ohio.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed 
in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this 
Court’s  Rule  39.8.  Reported  below:  122  Ohio  St.  3d  1417,  908 
N.  E.  2d  428. 

No.  09–5099.  Young  v.  Department  of  Justice  et  al. 
C. A. 10th Cir.  Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma 
pauperis  denied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule 
39.8.  Reported  below:  316  Fed.  Appx.  764. 

No.  09–5111.  Simmons  v.  California  et  al.  C.  A.  9th  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  de­
nied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No.  09–5142.  Redford  v.  Redford.  Ct.  App.  Ga.  Motion  of 
petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and 
certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No.  09–5146.  Asemani  v.  Ahmadinejad,  President  of  the 
Islamic  Republic  of  Iran.  C.  A.  2d  Cir.  Motion  of  petitioner 
for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and  certiorari 
dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.