Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 655.0

808 

OCTOBER  TERM,  2009 

October  5,  2009 

558  U. S. 

No.  09–5790.  Sibley  v.  Grievance  Committee  of  the  Sev­
enth  Judicial  District.  App.  Div.,  Sup.  Ct.  N.  Y.,  4th  Jud. 
Dept.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pau­
peris  denied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule 
39.8.  Reported  below:  61  App.  Div.  3d  85,  874  N. Y.  S. 2d  338. 

No.  09–5800.  Danser  v.  Lawrence,  Judge,  United  States 
District  Court  for  the  Southern  District  of  Indiana. 
C. A. 7th Cir.  Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma 
pauperis  denied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule 
39.8. 

No.  09–5856.  Wagner  v.  United  States.  C.  A.  4th  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  de­
nied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  Re­
ported  below:  314  Fed.  Appx.  626. 

No.  09–5878.  Childs  v.  Weinshienk,  Senior  Judge,  United 
States District Court for the District of Colorado.  C. A. 
10th  Cir.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma 
pauperis  denied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule 
39.8.  Reported  below:  320  Fed.  Appx.  860. 

No.  09–6054.  Voinche  v.  United  States  District  Court 
for  the  Middle  District  of  Louisiana  et  al.  C.  A.  5th  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  de­
nied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  Re­
ported  below:  327  Fed.  Appx.  525. 

Miscellaneous  Orders 

No.  08A1098  (08–1204).  Gimbel  v.  California  et al.,  556 
U.  S.  1269.  Application  for  leave  to  ﬁle  petition  for  rehearing  in 
excess  of  the  word  limit,  addressed  to  Justice  Ginsburg  and 
referred  to  the  Court,  denied. 

No.  09A140  (09–246).  Bridgeport  Roman  Catholic  Dioce­
san  Corp.  v.  New  York  Times  Co.  et  al.  Sup.  Ct.  Conn.  Ap­
plication  for  stay,  addressed  to  Justice  Scalia  and  referred  to 
the  Court,  denied. 

No.  08M92.  Torres  v.  Amerada  Hess  Corp.;
 
No. 09M12.  Roberson v.  LFI Fort Pierce, Inc.,  et al.; and
 
No.  09M17.  Abercrombie  v.  Department  of  Agriculture.
 
Motions  to  direct  the  Clerk  to  ﬁle  petitions  for  writs  of  certiorari 
out  of  time  under  this  Court’s  Rule  14.5  denied.