Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 815.0

968 

OCTOBER TERM, 2009 

October 20, 2009 

558 U. S. 

Professor  Rafael  I.  Pardo  for  leave  to  ﬁle  a  brief  as  amicus  cu­
riae granted. 

No.  08–1151.  Stop  the  Beach  Renourishment,  Inc.  v. 
Florida  Department  of  Environmental  Protection  et  al. 
Sup.  Ct.  Fla. 
[Certiorari  granted,  557  U. S.  903.]  Motion  of  the 
Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as ami­
cus  curiae  and  for  divided  argument  granted. 

No.  09–5973.  Torain  v.  Ameritech  Advanced  Data  Serv­

ices.  C.  A.  7th  Cir.; 

No. 09–6078.  GwanJun Kim v. Progressive Express Insur­

ance  Co.  et  al.  C.  A.  11th  Cir.; 

No. 09–6453.  Roach v.  Rockingham County Board of Edu­

cation  et  al.  C.  A.  4th  Cir.;  and 

No.  09–6595.  Schmitz  v.  United  States.  C.  A.  11th  Cir. 
Motions  of  petitioners  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis 
denied.  Petitioners  are  allowed  until  November  10,  2009,  within 
which  to  pay  the  docketing  fees  required  by  Rule  38(a)  and  to 
submit  petitions  in  compliance  with  Rule  33.1  of  the  Rules  of 
this  Court. 

No.  09–6658.  In  re  Curtis; 
No.  09–6677.  In  re  Warren; 
No.  09–6716.  In  re  Martinez;  and 
No.  09–6733.  In  re  Velarde.  Petitions  for  writs  of  habeas 

corpus  denied. 

No.  09–6708.  In  re  Berry;  and 
No.  09–6748.  In  re  Carbin.  Motions  of  petitioners  for  leave 
to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and  petitions  for  writs  of 
habeas  corpus  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No.  09–5944.  In  re  Williams;  and 
No.  09–6024.  In  re  Rochester.  Motions  of  petitioners  for 
leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petitions for writs 
of  mandamus  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No.  09–204.  In  re  Klat.  Petition  for  writ  of  mandamus  and/ 

or  prohibition  denied. 

No.  09–6139.  In  re  Traylor.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave 
to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and  petition  for  writ  of 
mandamus  and/or  prohibition  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule 
39.8.