Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 992.0

ORDERS 

1145 

558 U. S. 

January 19, 2010 

tion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied, 
and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  Reported 
below:  15  So.  3d  582. 

No.  09–7599.  Bailey  v.  Wakefield  et  al.  C.  A.  3d  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  de­
nied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  As 
petitioner  has  repeatedly  abused  this  Court’s  process,  the  Clerk 
is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal mat­
ters  from  petitioner  unless  the  docketing  fee  required  by  Rule 
38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 
33.1.  See  Martin  v.  District  of  Columbia  Court  of  Appeals,  506 
U. S.  1  (1992)  (per  curiam).  Justice  Stevens  dissents.  See 
id.,  at  4,  and  cases  cited  therein. 

Miscellaneous  Orders 

No. 09A541.  Norton v.  Fannie Mae.  Ct. App. Ga.  Applica­
tion  for  stay,  addressed  to  Justice  Sotomayor  and  referred  to 
the  Court,  denied. 

No. 09M63.  Kastner  v.  Martin  & Drought, Inc.,  fka Mar­

tin,  Drought  &  Torres,  Inc.,  et  al.;  and 

No. 09M64.  Cooley v. St. Bernard Parish Bureau of Pris­
ons et al.  Motions to direct the Clerk to ﬁle petitions for writs 
of  certiorari  out  of  time  denied. 

No.  1,  Orig.  Wisconsin  et  al.  v.  Illinois  et  al.; 
No.  2,  Orig.  Michigan  v.  Illinois  et  al.;  and 
No.  3,  Orig.  New  York  v.  Illinois  et  al.  Motion  of  Michi­
[For  earlier  order  herein, 

gan  for  preliminary  injunction  denied. 
see, e.  g.,  449  U. S.  48.] 

No.  08–1234.  Kiyemba  et  al.  v.  Obama,  President  of  the 
United  States,  et  al.  C.  A.  D.  C.  Cir. 
[Certiorari  granted, 
ante, p. 969.]  Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma 
pauperis  granted. 

No.  09–338.  Renico,  Warden  v.  Lett.  C.  A.  6th  Cir. 

[Cer­
tiorari  granted,  ante,  p. 1047.]  Motion  of  respondent  for  appoint­
ment  of  counsel  granted.  Marla  R.  McCowan,  of  Detroit,  Mich., 
is  appointed  to  serve  as  counsel  for  respondent  in  this  case. 

No. 09–529.  Virginia Office of Protection and Advocacy 
v.  Reinhard, Commissioner, Virginia Department of Behav­