Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 939.0

1092 

OCTOBER TERM, 2009 

December 14, 2009 

558 U. S. 

No. 09–434.  Vathis v.  Florida.  Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. 

Certiorari  denied.  Reported  below:  9  So.  3d  622. 

No.  09–436.  Roy  v.  Minnesota.  Ct.  App.  Minn.  Certiorari 

denied.  Reported  below:  761  N. W.  2d  883. 

No.  09–441.  Ventimiglia  et  ux.  v.  St.  Louis,  Church  of 
God,  Inc.,  dba  Twin  Rivers  Worship  Center,  et  al.  Ct. 
App. Mo., Eastern Dist.  Certiorari denied.  Reported below: 284 
S. W.  3d  681. 

No.  09–465.  Bowers  v.  City  of  Eugene,  Oregon,  et  al. 
Ct. App. Ore.  Certiorari denied.  Reported below: 227 Ore. App. 
290,  205  P.  3d  890. 

No.  09–492.  Lewis  et  al.  v.  Citgo  Petroleum  Corp.  C.  A. 

7th  Cir.  Certiorari  denied.  Reported  below:  561  F.  3d  698. 

No.  09–508.  Novelty,  Inc.  v.  Drug  Enforcement  Adminis­
tration  et  al.  C.  A.  D.  C.  Cir.  Certiorari  denied.  Reported 
below:  571  F.  3d  1176. 

No.  09–521.  Grund  v.  Sprinkle.  Sup.  Ct.  Ga.  Certiorari 

denied. 

No.  09–557.  Royal  Oak  Entertainment,  L.  L.  C.,  et  al.  v. 
City  of  Royal  Oak,  Michigan,  et  al.  C.  A.  6th  Cir.  Certio­
rari  denied.  Reported  below:  316  Fed.  Appx.  482. 

No.  09–582.  Betts  v.  United  States.  C.  A.  7th  Cir.  Cer­

tiorari  denied.  Reported  below:  576  F.  3d  738. 

No. 09–584.  Burton  v.  United States.  C. A.  4th Cir.  Cer­

tiorari  denied.  Reported  below:  329  Fed.  Appx.  469. 

No.  09–5124.  Marmolejo-Campos,  aka  Ramos  Armando  v. 
Holder,  Attorney  General.  C.  A.  9th  Cir.  Certiorari  de­
nied.  Reported  below:  558  F.  3d  903. 

No.  09– 5171.  Hernandez-Carrera  et  al.  v.  United 
States.  C.  A.  10th  Cir.  Certiorari  denied.  Reported  below: 
547  F.  3d  1237. 

No.  09–5466.  Lopez-Garcia  v.  United  States.  C.  A.  11th 

Cir.  Certiorari  denied.  Reported  below:  565  F.  3d  1306.