Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/529bv.pdf
Page Number: 1189

529IND

Unit: $UBV [10-03-01 07:01:03] PGT: INDBV (Bound Volume)

INDEX

1209

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW—Continued.
a viewpoint-neutral program to facilitate extracurricular student speech.
Board of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System v. Southworth, p. 217.

2. Telecommunications Act of 1996—Cable television regulation—Sex-
ually oriented programming.—Because Government failed to prove that
§ 505 of Act, which requires cable television operators to fully scramble
sexually oriented programming before 10 p.m., is least restrictive means
for addressing “signal bleed,” District Court did not err in holding statute
violative of First Amendment. United States v. Playboy Entertainment
Group, Inc., p. 803.

VII. Privilege Against Self-Incrimination.

Prosecutor’s comments on presence at trial.—A prosecutor’s comments
that respondent had an opportunity to hear all other witnesses before
testifying and tailor his testimony accordingly did not violate his Fifth
Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Portuondo v. Agard,
p. 61.

VIII. Right to be Present at Trial and Confront Accusers.

Prosecutor’s comments.—A prosecutor’s comments that respondent had
an opportunity to hear all other witnesses before testifying and tailor his
testimony accordingly did not violate his Sixth Amendment rights to be
present at trial and confront his accusers. Portuondo v. Agard, p. 61.

IX. Right to Counsel.

Effective assistance—Failure to present mitigating evidence.—Fourth
Circuit’s decision concluding that petitioner was not denied his right to
effective assistance of counsel when his trial lawyers failed to investigate
and to present substantial mitigating evidence is reversed. Williams v.
Taylor, p. 362.

X. Searches and Seizures.

1. Bus passenger—Manipulation of luggage.—A law enforcement ofﬁ-
cer’s physical manipulation of a bus passenger’s carry-on luggage violates
Fourth Amendment’s proscription against unreasonable searches. Bond
v. United States, p. 334.

2. Stop and frisk—Anonymous tip.—An anonymous tip that a person
is carrying a gun is not, without more, sufﬁcient to justify a police ofﬁcer’s
stop and frisk of that person. Florida v. J. L., p. 266.

CONVICTIONS AS EVIDENCE. See Criminal Law, 3.

CRIMINAL LAW. See Constitutional Law, II, 2; IV; VII–X; Habeas

Corpus.

1. Arson—Federal prosecution.—Because an owner-occupied residence
not used for any commercial purpose does not qualify as property “used