Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 661

814 

OCTOBER  TERM,  2009 

October  5,  2009 

558  U. S. 

No.  08–10974.  In  re  Shelton; 
No.  08–11007.  In  re  Brown; 
No.  08–11123.  In  re  Winns; 
No.  09–211.  In  re  Fleming  et  ux.; 
No.  09–5332.  In  re  Robinson; 
No.  09–5487.  In  re  Vann;  and 
No.  09–5876.  In  re  Daley.  Petitions  for  writs  of  mandamus 

denied. 

No.  09–5612.  In  re  Bravo.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to 
proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of manda­
mus  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  As  petitioner  has 
repeatedly  abused  this  Court’s  process,  the  Clerk  is  directed  not 
to  accept  any  further  petitions  in  noncriminal  matters  from  peti­
tioner  unless  the docketing  fee  required  by  Rule  38(a) is  paid  and 
the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1.  See Mar­
tin  v.  District  of  Columbia  Court  of  Appeals,  506  U. S.  1  (1992) 
(per  curiam).  Justice  Stevens  dissents.  See  id.,  at  4,  and 
cases  cited  therein. 

No.  08–1549.  In  re  Birks; 
No.  08–11003.  In  re  Singletary; 
No.  08–11070.  In  re  Augustin;  and 
No.  09–5411.  In  re  Arnold.  Petitions  for  writs  of  manda­

mus  and/or  prohibition  denied. 

No.  08–10356.  In  re  Alpine; 
No.  08–10732.  In  re  Alpine; 
No.  08–10846.  In  re  Michalski; 
No.  09–5098.  In  re  Foose; 
No.  09–5442.  In  re  Hill;  and 
No.  09–5595.  In  re  Muhammad.  Motions  of  petitioners  for 
leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petitions for writs 
of mandamus and/or prohibition dismissed.  See this Court’s Rule 
39.8. 

No.  08–10941.  In  re  Telemaque.  Petition  for  writ  of  prohi­

bition  denied. 

Certiorari  Denied 

No.  08–1048.  Marquardt  v.  Sebelius,  Secretary  of 
Health  and  Human  Services.  C.  A.  5th  Cir.  Certiorari  de­
nied.  Reported  below:  294  Fed.  Appx.  112.