Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/529bv.pdf
Page Number: 100

529US1

Unit: $U32

[10-04-01 09:20:53] PAGES PGT: OPIN

Cite as: 529 U. S. 1 (2000)

25

Appendix to opinion of the Court

VI

For these reasons, this case cannot ﬁt within Michigan
Academy’s exception. The bar of § 405(h) applies. The
judgment of the Court of Appeals is

Reversed.

APPENDIX TO OPINION OF THE COURT

42 U. S. C. § 1395cc(h)(1) provides:

“(h) Dissatisfaction with determination of Secretary;
appeal by institutions or agencies; single notice and
hearing

“(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), an institu-
tion or agency dissatisﬁed with a determination by the
Secretary that it is not a provider of services or with a
determination described in subsection (b)(2) of this sec-
tion shall be entitled to a hearing thereon by the Secre-
tary (after reasonable notice) to the same extent as is
provided in section 405(b) of this title, and to judicial
review of the Secretary’s ﬁnal decision after such hear-
ing as is provided in section 405(g) of this title, except
that, in so applying such sections and in applying section
405(l) of this title thereto, any reference therein to the
Commissioner of Social Security or the Social Security
Administration shall be considered a reference to the
Secretary or the Department of Health and Human
Services, respectively.”

42 U. S. C. § 1395cc(b) provides, in relevant part:

“(b) Termination or nonrenewal of agreements

.

.

.

.

.

“(2) The Secretary may refuse to enter into an agree-
ment under this section or, upon such reasonable notice
to the provider and the public as may be speciﬁed in
regulations, may refuse to renew or may terminate such
an agreement after the Secretary—