Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/12pdf/11-556_11o2.pdf
Page Number: 56.0

22 

VANCE v. BALL STATE UNIV. 

GINSBURG, J., dissenting 

(1989);  and  Price  Waterhouse  v.  Hopkins,  490  U. S.  228 
(1989).  The ball is once again in Congress’ court to correct 
the  error  into  which  this  Court  has  fallen,  and  to  restore 
the  robust  protections  against  workplace  harassment  the
Court weakens today. 

* 

* 
For the reasons stated, I would reverse the judgment of
the Seventh Circuit and remand the case for application of
the  proper  standard  for  determining  who  qualifies  as  a 
supervisor. 

*