Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 993

1146 

OCTOBER TERM, 2009 

January 19, 2010 

558 U. S. 

ioral  Health  and  Developmental  Services,  et  al.  C.  A. 
4th  Cir.  The  Solicitor  General  is  invited  to  ﬁle  a  brief  in  this 
case  expressing  the  views  of  the  United  States. 

No.  09–6554.  Plummer  v.  California.  Sup.  Ct.  Cal.  Mo­
tion  of  petitioner  for  reconsideration  of  order  denying  leave  to 
proceed  in  forma  pauperis  [ante,  p.  1021]  denied. 

No.  09–6764.  Royse  v.  Corning  Glass  Works,  Inc.  C.  A. 
6th Cir.  Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying 
leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  [ante,  p.  1046]  denied. 

No.  09–6888.  Beaver  v.  McNeil,  Secretary,  Florida  De­
partment of Corrections.  Sup. Ct. Fla.  Motion of petitioner 
for  reconsideration  of  order  denying  leave  to  proceed  in  forma 
pauperis  [ante,  p.  1074]  denied. 

No.  09–6916.  Howard  v.  Supreme  Court  of  Ohio  et  al. 
C.  A.  6th  Cir.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  reconsideration  of  order 
denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ante, p. 1087] denied. 

No.  09–7550.  Jones  v.  Liberty  Bank  &  Trust  Co.  et  al. 
C. A. 5th Cir.  Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma 
pauperis  denied.  Petitioner  is  allowed  until  February  9,  2010, 
within  which  to  pay  the  docketing  fee  required  by  Rule  38(a)  and 
to  submit  a  petition  in  compliance  with  Rule  33.1  of  the  Rules  of 
this  Court. 

No.  09–7565.  Corines  v.  Killian,  Warden.  C.  A.  2d  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  de­
nied.  Petitioner  is  allowed  until  February  9,  2010,  within  which 
to  pay  the  docketing  fee  required  by  Rule  38(a)  and  to  submit  a 
petition  in  compliance  with  Rule  33.1  of  the  Rules  of  this  Court. 
Justice  Sotomayor  took  no  part  in  the  consideration  or  decision 
of  this  motion. 

No.  09–8096.  In  re  Walls; 
No.  09–8190.  In  re  Gutierrez; 
No.  09–8237.  In  re  Miller;  and 
No.  09–8285.  In  re  Bartoli.  Petitions  for  writs  of  habeas 

corpus  denied. 

No.  09–7455.  In  re  Wilber.  Petition  for  writ  of  mandamus 

denied.