Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 957.0

1110 

OCTOBER TERM, 2009 

January 11, 2010 

558 U. S. 

habeas  corpus  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  As  peti­
tioner  has  repeatedly  abused  this  Court’s  process,  the  Clerk  is 
directed  not  to  accept  any  further  petitions  in  noncriminal  mat­
ters  from  petitioner  unless  the  docketing  fee  required  by  Rule 
38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 
33.1.  See  Martin  v.  District  of  Columbia  Court  of  Appeals,  506 
U. S.  1  (1992)  (per  curiam).  Justice  Stevens  dissents.  See 
id.,  at  4,  and  cases  cited  therein. 

No.  09–7561.  In  re  Torrance;  and 
No. 09–7884.  In re Washington.  Petitions for writs of man­

damus  and/or  prohibition  denied. 

Certiorari  Denied 

No.  08–1462.  York  et  al.  v.  Robinson.  C.  A.  9th  Cir.  Cer­

tiorari  denied.  Reported  below:  566  F.  3d  817. 

No.  08–1571.  Cooley  et  al.  v.  Eng.  C.  A.  9th  Cir.  Certio­

rari  denied.  Reported  below:  552  F.  3d  1062. 

No.  08–10679.  Johnson  v.  Thaler,  Director,  Texas  De­
partment  of  Criminal  Justice,  Correctional  Institutions 
Division.  C.  A.  5th  Cir.  Certiorari  denied. 

No.  09–142.  Fieger  v.  Supreme  Court  of  Michigan  et  al. 
C. A. 6th Cir.  Certiorari denied.  Reported below: 553 F. 3d 955. 

No.  09–194.  Gomis  v.  Holder,  Attorney  General.  C.  A. 

4th  Cir.  Certiorari  denied.  Reported  below:  571  F.  3d  353. 

No.  09–229.  Khan  et  al.  v.  Holder,  Attorney  General. 
C. A. 7th Cir.  Certiorari denied.  Reported below: 554 F. 3d 681. 

No.  09–239.  Allen  v.  Montana.  Sup.  Ct.  Mont.  Certiorari 

denied.  Reported  below:  350  Mont.  562,  213  P.  3d  789. 

No.  09–252.  Quinn  v.  Roach  et  al.  C.  A.  5th  Cir.  Certio­

rari  denied.  Reported  below:  326  Fed.  Appx.  280. 

No.  09–275.  Rodis  v.  City  and  County  of  San  Francisco, 
California,  et  al.  C.  A.  9th  Cir.  Certiorari  denied.  Re­
ported  below:  558  F.  3d  964. 

No.  09–277.  Connecticut  Department  of  Public  Utility 
Control et al. v.  Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.