Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 650

ORDERS 

803 

558  U. S. 

October  5,  2009 

criminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required 
by  Rule  38(a)  is  paid  and  the  petition  is  submitted  in  compliance 
with  Rule  33.1.  See  Martin  v.  District  of  Columbia  Court  of 
Appeals,  506  U. S.  1  (1992)  (per  curiam).  Justice  Stevens  dis­
sents.  See  id.,  at  4,  and  cases  cited  therein. 

No.  08–10619.  Asemani v.  Islamic  Republic of  Iran et  al. 
C.  A.  D.  C.  Cir.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in 
forma  pauperis  denied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this 
Court’s  Rule  39.8.  Reported  below:  322  Fed.  Appx.  1. 

No.  08–10650.  Dasisa  v.  University  of  Massachusetts 
Board  of  Trustees.  C.  A.  1st  Cir.  Motion  of  petitioner  for 
leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and  certiorari  dis­
missed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No.  08–10685.  Asemani  v.  United  States.  C.  A.  4th  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  de­
nied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  Re­
ported  below:  328  Fed.  Appx.  211. 

No.  08–10783.  Smith  v.  Charleston  County  School  Dis­
trict  et  al.  C.  A.  4th  Cir.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to 
proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed.  See 
this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  Reported  below:  318  Fed.  Appx.  193. 

No.  08–10847.  Simmons  v.  Flecker.  C.  A.  9th  Cir.  Motion 
of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and 
certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No. 08–10890.  Swain v. Small, Warden.  C. A. 9th Cir.  Mo­
tion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied, 
and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No.  08–10899.  Penk  v.  Coffman,  Secretary  of  State  of 
Colorado,  et al.  Sup.  Ct.  Colo.  Motion  of petitioner  for  leave 
to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and  certiorari  dismissed. 
See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No.  08–10923.  Shabazz  v.  California.  Sup.  Ct.  Cal.  Mo­
tion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied, 
and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  As  peti­
tioner  has  repeatedly  abused  this  Court’s  process,  the  Clerk  is 
directed  not  to  accept  any  further  petitions  in  noncriminal  mat­
ters  from  petitioner  unless  the  docketing  fee  required  by  Rule