Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 892

ORDERS 

1045 

558 U. S. 

November 30, 2009 

for  leave  to  participate  in  oral  argument  as  amici  curiae  and  for 
divided  argument  denied. 

No.  08–10543.  Karnofel  v.  Girard  Police  Department 
et  al.  Ct.  App.  Ohio,  Trumbull  County.  Motion  of  petitioner 
for  reconsideration  of  order  denying  leave  to  proceed  in  forma 
pauperis  [ante,  p.  802]  denied. 

No.  08–10578.  Wells  v.  Vasquez,  Warden.  C.  A.  9th  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  reconsideration  of  order  denying  leave  to 
proceed  in  forma  pauperis  [ante,  p.  802]  denied. 

No.  08–10650.  Dasisa  v.  University  of  Massachusetts 
Board  of  Trustees.  C.  A.  1st  Cir.  Motion  of  petitioner  for 
reconsideration  of  order  denying  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pau­
peris  [ante,  p.  803]  denied. 

No.  08–10732.  In  re  Alpine.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  recon­
sideration  of  order  denying  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis 
[ante,  p.  814]  denied. 

No.  08–10847.  Simmons  v.  Flecker.  C.  A.  9th  Cir.  Motion 
of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed 
in  forma  pauperis  [ante,  p.  803]  denied. 

No.  08–10986.  Strong  v.  Illinois  Department  of  Human 
Services.  C.  A.  7th  Cir.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  reconsidera­
tion  of  order  denying  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  [ante, 
p.  804]  denied. 

No.  08–10997.  Williams  v.  Church’s  Chicken  et  al.  Ct. 
App.  Cal.,  2d  App.  Dist.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  reconsideration 
of  order  denying  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  [ante, 
p.  812]  denied. 

No.  09–5074.  Wakefield  v.  Cordis  Corp.  C.  A.  11th  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  reconsideration  of  order  denying  leave  to 
proceed  in  forma  pauperis  [ante,  p.  805]  denied. 

No.  09–5111.  Simmons  v.  California  et  al.  C.  A.  9th  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  reconsideration  of  order  denying  leave  to 
proceed  in  forma  pauperis  [ante,  p.  805]  denied. 

No.  09–5356.  Curto  v.  Siwek.  C.  A.  2d  Cir.  Motion  of  peti­
tioner  for  reconsideration  of  order  denying  leave  to  proceed  in