Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/09pdf/08-1371.pdf
Page Number: 38

32 

CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOC. CHAPTER OF UNIV. OF CAL., 
HASTINGS COLLEGE OF LAW v. MARTINEZ 

Opinion of the Court 

CLS’s  pretext  argument  if,  and  to  the  extent,  it  is 
preserved.29 

* 

* 
For  the  foregoing  reasons,  we  affirm  the  Court  of  Ap­
peals’  ruling  that  the  all-comers  policy  is  constitutional 
and  remand  the  case  for  further  proceedings  consistent
with this opinion. 

* 

It is so ordered. 

—————— 

CLS’s  petition  for  certiorari  emphasized  was  the  case  here.    Pet.  for 
Cert. 2. 

29 The  dissent’s  pretext  discussion  presents  a  one-sided  summary  of 
the record evidence, post, at 31–34, an account depending in large part
on  impugning  the  veracity  of  a  distinguished  legal  scholar  and  a  well
respected  school  administrator,  post,  at  3,  5,  6,  7,  8,  9,  11,  24,  32,  34. 
See also supra, at 10, n. 7.