Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/143orig_1qm1.pdf
Page Number: 15.0

12 

MISSISSIPPI v. TENNESSEE 

Opinion of the Court 

der our original jurisdiction must prove by  clear and con-
vincing evidence some real and substantial injury or dam-
age.”  Idaho ex rel. Evans, 462 U. S., at 1027. 

As Mississippi has neither sought leave to amend nor ten-
dered  a  proposed  complaint  seeking  equitable  apportion-
ment,  we  have  no  occasion  to  determine  how  these  and 
other pertinent principles might apply. 

* 

* 

* 

Mississippi has failed to show that it is entitled to relief. 
We therefore overrule Mississippi’s exceptions to the Spe-
cial Master’s report, sustain Tennessee’s, and dismiss the 
case. 

It is so ordered.