Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/18pdf/18-302_e29g.pdf
Page Number: 13.0

Cite as:  588 U. S. ____ (2019) 

11 

Opinion of the Court 

matter  that  Congress  could  have  captured  some  of  the 
same  speech  through  a  viewpoint-neutral  statute?    Tam, 
582  U. S.,  at  ___  (opinion  of  Kennedy,  J.)  (slip  op.,  at  2). 
But  in  any  event,  the  “immoral  or  scandalous”  bar  is  sub-
stantially overbroad.  There are a great many immoral and 
scandalous  ideas  in  the  world  (even  more  than  there  are 
swearwords),  and  the  Lanham  Act  covers  them  all.   It 
therefore violates the First Amendment. 

We  accordingly  affirm  the  judgment  of  the  Court  of

Appeals. 

It is so ordered.