Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/19pdf/18-260_jifl.pdf
Page Number: 4.0

4 

COUNTY OF MAUI v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND 

Syllabus 

statutory objectives can also provide guidance, and EPA can provide 
administrative  guidance.    Although  this  interpretation  does  not  pre-
sent as clear a line as the other interpretations proffered, the EPA has 
applied the permitting provision to some discharges through ground-
water for over 30 years, with no evidence of inadministrability or an 
unmanageable expansion in the statute’s scope.  Pp. 15–18. 

886 F. 3d 737, vacated and remanded. 

BREYER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., 
and GINSBURG, SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, and KAVANAUGH, JJ., joined.  KAV-
ANAUGH,  J.,  filed  a  concurring  opinion.  THOMAS,  J.,  filed  a  dissenting 
opinion, in which GORSUCH, J., joined.  ALITO, J., filed a dissenting opin-
ion.