Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 866

ORDERS 

1019 

558 U. S. 

November 9, 2009 

No.  09–6964.  Porter  et  al.  v.  United  States.  C.  A.  10th 

Cir.  Certiorari  denied.  Reported  below:  334  Fed.  Appx.  184. 

No.  08–1410.  Handle  with  Care  Behavior  Management 
System,  Inc.  v.  New  York  State  Division  for  Youth  et  al. 
C.  A.  2d  Cir.  Certiorari  denied.  Justice  Sotomayor  took  no 
part  in  the  consideration  or  decision  of  this  petition.  Reported 
below:  546  F.  3d  230. 

No. 09–312.  Greene v.  Hanover Direct, Inc., et al.  C.  A. 
2d  Cir.  Certiorari  denied.  Justice  Sotomayor  took  no  part  in 
the  consideration  or  decision  of  this  petition.  Reported  below: 
326  Fed.  Appx.  57. 

No.  09–330.  Jin  Xin  Ye  v.  United  States  (Reported  below: 
338  Fed.  Appx.  26);  and  Yunxia  Liu  et  al.  v.  United  States 
(336 Fed. Appx. 106).  C. A. 2d Cir.  Certiorari denied.  Justice 
Sotomayor  took  no  part  in  the  consideration  or  decision  of  this 
petition. 

No. 09–424.  Pannell v.  United States.  C. A. 2d Cir.  Cer­
tiorari  denied.  Justice  Sotomayor  took  no  part  in  the  consid­
eration  or  decision  of  this  petition.  Reported  below:  321  Fed. 
Appx.  51. 

No.  09–6400.  Daigneault  v.  Eaton  Corp.  et  al.  C.  A.  2d 
Cir.  Certiorari denied.  Justice Sotomayor took no part in the 
consideration  or  decision  of  this  petition. 

No.  09–6927.  Brown  v.  United  States.  C.  A.  2d  Cir.  Cer­
tiorari  denied.  Justice  Sotomayor  took  no  part  in  the  consid­
eration  or  decision  of  this  petition.  Reported  below:  328  Fed. 
Appx.  57. 

No.  09–7328  (09A428).  Muhammad  v.  Kelly,  Warden.  C.  A. 
4th  Cir.  Application  for  stay  of  execution  of  sentence  of  death, 
presented  to  The  Chief  Justice,  and  by  him  referred  to  the 
Court,  denied.  Certiorari  denied.  Reported  below:  575  F.  3d 
359. 

Statement of Justice Stevens, with whom Justice Ginsburg 
and Justice Sotomayor join, respecting the denial of the petition 
for  writ  of  certiorari. 

This  case  highlights  once  again  the  perversity  of  executing  in­
mates  before  their  appeals  process  has  been  fully  concluded.