Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 660.0

ORDERS 

813 

558  U. S. 

October  5,  2009 

No.  09–5754.  In  re  Hernandez; 
No.  09–5755.  In  re  Tapia-Fierro; 
No.  09–5803.  In  re  Schmidt; 
No.  09–5873.  In  re  Morris; 
No.  09–5880.  In  re  Coppage; 
No.  09–5882.  In  re  Neal-El; 
No.  09–5907.  In  re  York; 
No.  09–5912.  In  re  Butler; 
No.  09–5948.  In  re  Del  Toro; 
No.  09–5953.  In  re  Davies; 
No.  09–6049.  In  re  Carter; 
No.  09–6145.  In  re  Jackson;  and 
No.  09–6189.  In  re  Bush.  Petitions  for  writs  of  habeas  cor­

pus  denied. 

No.  08–10784.  In  re  Smith;
 
No.  08–10886.  In  re  Alpine;
 
No.  09–5106.  In  re  Sinquefield;
 
No.  09–5122.  In  re  Sherratt;
 
No.  09–5768.  In  re  Miller;
 
No.  09–5814.  In  re  Treece;
 
No.  09–5945.  In  re  Williams;
 
No.  09–6154.  In  re  Millen;  and
 
No.  09–6233.  In  re  Cluck.  Motions  of  petitioners  for  leave
 
to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and  petitions  for  writs  of 
habeas  corpus  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No.  09–6291.  In  re  Bennett.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave 
to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and  petition  for  writ  of 
habeas  corpus  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  As  peti­
tioner  has  repeatedly  abused  this  Court’s  process,  the  Clerk  is 
directed  not  to  accept  any  further  petitions  in  noncriminal  mat­
ters  from  petitioner  unless  the  docketing  fee  required  by  Rule 
38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 
33.1.  See  Martin  v.  District  of  Columbia  Court  of  Appeals,  506 
U. S.  1  (1992)  (per  curiam).  Justice  Stevens  dissents.  See 
id.,  at  4,  and  cases  cited  therein. 

No.  08–1559.  In  re  Corrigan; 
No.  08–10443.  In  re  Richard; 
No.  08–10712.  In  re  Stonier; 
No.  08–10759.  In  re  Manship; 
No.  08–10927.  In  re  Roberts;