Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/21pdf/21-234_2b8e.pdf
Page Number: 3.0

Cite as:  596 U. S. ____ (2022) 

3 

Syllabus 

relief for subsequent changes in interpretation does not mean that the 
principle did not carry over to the statute.  Statutory “silence” on the 
details  of  prior  regulatory  practice  indicates  that  Congress  “left  the 
matter where it was pre-[codification].”  Kucana v. Holder, 558 U. S. 
233, 250.  Pp. 8–12. 

991 F. 3d 1227, affirmed. 

BARRETT, J., delivered  the  opinion  of  the  Court,  in  which  ROBERTS, 
C. J.,  and  THOMAS,  ALITO,  KAGAN,  and  KAVANAUGH,  JJ.,  joined.  SO-
TOMAYOR, J., filed a dissenting opinion.  GORSUCH, J., filed a dissenting 
opinion, in which BREYER, J., joined, and in which SOTOMAYOR, J., joined
as to all but Part II–C.