Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/17pdf/16-111_new2_22p3.pdf
Page Number: 25.0

4 

MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD. v. COLORADO 
CIVIL RIGHTS COMM’N
 
KAGAN, J., concurring
 

says, “can protect gay persons, just as it can protect other
classes of individuals, in acquiring whatever products and 
services they choose on the same terms and conditions as
are  offered  to  other  members  of  the  public.”    Ante,  at  10. 
For that reason, Colorado can treat a baker who discrimi-
nates based on sexual orientation differently from a baker 
who does not discriminate on that or any other prohibited
ground.  But only, as the Court rightly says, if the State’s 
decisions  are  not  infected  by  religious  hostility  or  bias.    I 
accordingly concur.