Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/23pdf/22-529_1b7d.pdf
Page Number: 18.0

14 

CANTERO v. BANK OF AMERICA, N. A. 

Opinion of the Court 

the  case  for  further  proceedings  consistent  with  this
opinion.4 

It is so ordered. 

—————— 

4 During the course of the litigation, the parties have raised two other 
issues that the Court of Appeals did not address and that it may address 
as  appropriate  on  remand:  first,  the  significance  here  (if  any)  of  the 
preemption rules of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency; and
second,  the  relevance  here  (if  any)  of  the  Dodd-Frank  provision  that
preempts state consumer financial laws if a federal law “other than title
62  of  the  Revised  Statutes”  preempts  the  state  law,  12  U. S. C. 
§25b(b)(1)(C).