Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 649

802 

OCTOBER  TERM,  2009 

October  5,  2009 

558  U. S. 

No.  08–10168.  Herships  v.  California.  Ct.  App.  Cal.,  6th 
App.  Dist.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma 
pauperis  denied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule 
39.8. 

No.  08–10266.  Hobley  v.  District  of  Columbia.  Ct.  App. 
D.  C.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pau­
peris  denied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule 
39.8.  As  petitioner  has  repeatedly  abused  this  Court’s  process, 
the  Clerk  is  directed  not  to  accept  any  further  petitions  in  non­
criminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required 
by  Rule  38(a)  is  paid  and  the  petition  is  submitted  in  compliance 
with  Rule  33.1.  See  Martin  v.  District  of  Columbia  Court  of 
Appeals,  506  U. S.  1  (1992)  (per  curiam).  Justice  Stevens  dis­
sents.  See  id.,  at  4,  and  cases  cited  therein. 

No. 08–10401.  Harris v.  Walker, Warden, et al.  C. A. 9th 
Cir.  Motion of  petitioner for leave  to proceed in  forma pauperis 
denied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No.  08–10457.  Castillo  v.  Guidry.  Ct.  App.  La.,  5th  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  de­
nied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  Re­
ported  below:  995  So.  2d  50. 

No.  08–10490.  McCright  v.  Evans,  Warden.  C.  A.  9th  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  de­
nied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8.  Re­
ported  below:  299  Fed.  Appx.  743. 

No.  08–10543.  Karnofel  v.  Girard  Police  Department 
et  al.  Ct.  App.  Ohio,  Trumbull  County.  Motion  of  petitioner 
for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  denied,  and  certiorari 
dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No.  08–10578.  Wells  v.  Vasquez,  Warden.  C.  A.  9th  Cir. 
Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  de­
nied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule  39.8. 

No.  08–10595.  McGowan  v.  Tennessee.  Ct.  Crim.  App. 
Tenn.  Motion  of  petitioner  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pau­
peris  denied,  and  certiorari  dismissed.  See  this  Court’s  Rule 
39.8.  As  petitioner  has  repeatedly  abused  this  Court’s  process, 
the  Clerk  is  directed  not  to  accept  any  further  petitions  in  non­