Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/17pdf/16-476_dbfi.pdf
Page Number: 44.0

Cite as:  584 U. S. ____ (2018) 

3 

BREYER, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part 
Opinion of BREYER, J. 

victory here mostly Pyrrhic.  But that is because the only
problem  with  the  challenged  part  of  §3702(1)  lies  in  its 
means, not its end.  Congress has the constitutional power 
to  prohibit  sports  gambling  schemes,  and  no  party  here 
argues that there is any constitutional defect in §3702(2)’s
alternative means of doing so.

I  consequently  join  JUSTICE  GINSBURG’s  dissenting
opinion  in  part,  and  all  but  Part  VI–B  of  the  Court’s 
opinion.