Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/529bv.pdf
Page Number: 1053.0

529ORD Unit: $PT2

[10-09-01 14:50:48] PGT: ORDPP (Prelim. Print)

1064

OCTOBER TERM, 1999

April 17, 2000

529 U. S.

within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not
be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Dissenting statement by Justice Stevens, with whom Jus-

tice Breyer joins.

In my opinion Teddy I. Moore should be reprimanded for his
unprofessional conduct and also admonished that future miscon-
duct of the same sort will be sanctioned more severely.

No. 99M81. Kutschke v. Commissioner of Social Secu-

rity; and

No. 99M82. Green v. United States. Motions to direct the
Clerk to ﬁle petitions for writs of certiorari out of time under
this Court’s Rule 14.5 denied.

No. 99M83. Pride v. Moses et al. Motion to direct the

Clerk to ﬁle petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

No. 99–658. Castillo et al. v. United States. C. A. 5th
Cir.
[Certiorari granted, 528 U. S. 1109.] Motion of petitioner
Graeme Leonard Craddock for leave to proceed further herein
in forma pauperis granted.

No. 99–696. American Grain Trimmers, Inc., et al. v. Of-
fice of Workers’ Compensation Programs et al., 528 U. S.
1187. Motion of respondent Marian Janich for attorney’s fees
denied without prejudice to ﬁling in the United States Court of
Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

No. 99–7476. Steele v. California Department of Social
Services et al. C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for recon-
sideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis
[528 U. S. 1148] denied.

No. 99–7492. Abidekun v. Department of Education.
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order
denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [528 U. S. 1148]
denied.

No. 99–8171.
No. 99–8683.
No. 99–8792.
corpus denied.

In re Roland;
In re Clay; and
In re Patterson. Petitions for writs of habeas

No. 99–8151.

In re Felder;