Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 955

1108 

OCTOBER TERM, 2009 

January 11, 2010 

558 U. S. 

Court,  it  is  ordered  that  his  name  be  stricken  from  the  roll  of 
attorneys  admitted  to  the  practice  of  law  before  this  Court.  The 
rule  to  show  cause,  issued  on  November  30,  2009  [ante,  p.  1043], 
is  discharged. 

No.  09M59.  Clark  v.  Burtt,  Warden; 
No. 09M60.  Filbrandt v. Michigan Department of Human 

Services;  and 

No.  09M61.  Polk  v.  Dunckle  et  al.  Motions  to  direct  the 
Clerk  to  ﬁle  petitions  for  writs  of  certiorari  out  of  time  denied. 
No.  09M62.  P.  S.  et  al.  v.  Franklin  County  Children 
Services.  Motion  for  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis  with­
out  an  afﬁdavit  of  indigency  executed  by  petitioner  granted. 
No.  08–1301.  Carr  v.  United  States.  C.  A.  7th  Cir. 

[Cer­
tiorari  granted,  557  U. S.  965.]  Motion  of  petitioner  to  dispense 
with  printing  the  joint  appendix  granted. 

No.  08–1457.  New  Process  Steel,  L.  P.  v.  National  Labor 
Relations  Board.  C.  A.  7th  Cir. 
[Certiorari  granted,  ante, 
p.  989.]  Motion  of  petitioner  to  dispense  with  printing  the  joint 
appendix  granted. 

No.  09–158.  Magwood  v.  Patterson,  Warden,  et  al.  C.  A. 
[Certiorari  granted,  ante,  p.  1023.]  Motions  of  peti­
11th  Cir. 
tioner  to  dispense  with  printing  the  joint  appendix,  for  leave  to 
proceed  in  forma  pauperis,  and  for  appointment  of  counsel 
granted.  Jeffrey  L.  Fisher,  Esq.,  of  Stanford,  Cal.,  is  appointed 
to  serve  as  counsel  for  petitioner  in  this  case. 

No.  09–233.  Triple-S  Management  Corp.  et  al.  v.  Munici­

pal  Revenue  Collection  Center.  Sup.  Ct.  P.  R.;  and 

No.  09–525.  Janus  Capital  Group,  Inc., et  al.  v.  First  De­
rivative  Traders.  C.  A.  4th  Cir.  The  Solicitor  General  is 
invited  to  ﬁle  briefs  in  these  cases  expressing  the  views  of  the 
United  States. 

No. 09–6233.  In re Cluck.  Motion of petitioner for reconsid­
eration  of  order  denying  leave  to  proceed  in  forma  pauperis 
[ante,  p.  813]  denied. 

No.  09–6234.  Cluck  v.  Washington.  Sup.  Ct.  Wash.  Mo­
tion  of  petitioner  for  reconsideration  of  order  denying  leave  to 
proceed  in  forma  pauperis  [ante,  p.  984]  denied.