Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 949

1102 

OCTOBER TERM, 2009 

December 14, 2009 

558 U. S. 

No.  09–5061.  Hakim  v.  Thomas,  Superintendent,  Lumber-

ton  Correctional  Institution,  ante,  p.  885; 

No.  09–5064.  Toriola  v.  Appellate  Division,  Supreme 
Court  of  New  York,  Second  Judicial  Department,  et  al., 
ante,  p.  885; 

No.  09–5180.  Floyd  v.  United  States,  ante,  p.  891; 
No.  09–5229.  Hailey  v.  Thaler,  Director,  Texas  Depart­
ment  of Criminal  Justice,  Correctional Institutions  Divi­
sion,  ante,  p.  893; 

No. 09–5353.  Del Castello v.  Superior Court of Califor­

nia,  Alameda  County,  ante,  p.  899; 

No.  09–5405.  Velazquez  v.  Lape,  Superintendent,  Cox­

sackie  Correctional  Facility,  et  al.,  ante,  p.  902; 

No.  09–5443. 
No.  09–5507. 
No.  09–5520. 
No.  09–5549. 
No.  09–5620. 
No.  09–5787. 
No.  09–5835. 
No.  09–5907. 
No.  09–5926. 
No.  09–6104. 
No.  09–6129. 

ante,  p.  929; 

Tucker  v.  Chipla  College,  ante,  p.  904;
 
Meizlik  v.  Florida,  ante,  p.  907;
 
Trobee  v.  United  States,  ante,  p.  907;
 
Johnson  v.  Kelly,  Warden,  ante,  p.  909;
 
Jones  v.  Florida,  ante,  p.  913;
 
Ford  v.  United  States,  ante,  p.  918;
 
Dean  v.  Blaisdell,  Warden,  ante,  p.  953;
 
In  re  York,  ante,  p.  813;
 
Reed  v.  Cirtin,  ante,  p.  971;
 
Anderson  v.  United  States,  ante,  p.  928;
 
Greenwood,  aka  Grimes  v.  United  States,
 

No.  09–6181. 

Balko  v.  McNeil,  Secretary,  Florida  De­

partment  of  Corrections,  et  al.,  ante,  p.  974; 

No.  09–6258.  Graham  v.  Missouri,  ante,  p.  998; 
No.  09–6434.  In  re  Telfair,  ante,  p.  988; 
No.  09–6435.  In  re  Telfair,  ante,  p.  989; 
No.  09–6468.  Telfair  v.  Tandy,  Administrator,  Drug  En­

forcement  Agency,  et  al.,  ante,  p.  1028; 

No. 09–6524.  White v.  Gates, Secretary of Defense, ante, 

p.  976; 

No.  09–6529.  In  re  Ndoromo,  ante,  p.  944;  and 
No.  09–6581.  Corral  v.  United  States,  ante,  p.  1000.  Peti­

tions  for  rehearing  denied. 

No.  09–5183.  Howard  v.  United  States,  ante,  p.  939;
 
No.  09–5322.  Mason  v.  Guzdek  et  al.,  ante,  p.  940;  and