Document ID: ./input/supremecourt_opinions/opinions/boundvolumes/558bv.pdf
Page Number: 986.0

ORDERS 

1139 

558 U. S. 

January 11, 2010 

No.  08–10487.  Widner  v.  McNeil,  Secretary,  Florida  De­

partment  of  Corrections,  ante,  p.  841; 

No.  08–10510.  Harper  v.  Southern  Star  Concrete,  ante, 

No.  08–10625.  GwanJun  Kim  v.  Department  of  Labor  et 

p.  842; 

al.,  ante,  p.  1023; 

No.  08–10693.  Candia  v.  United  States,  ante,  p.  848; 
No.  08–10833.  Benham  v.  United  States,  ante,  p.  856; 
No.  08–11142.  Burke  v.  United  States,  ante,  p.  873; 
No.  09–120.  T.  G.  v.  Kentucky  Cabinet  for  Health  and 

Family  Services,  ante,  p.  878; 

No.  09–202.  Ward  v.  Trans  Union,  LLC,  ante,  p.  990; 
No.  09–283.  Reeves v.  DSI  Security  Services et  al.,  ante, 

p.  992; 

No.  09–334.  Heimermann  v.  McCaughtry  et  al.,  ante, 

p.  992; 

No.  09–407.  Abreu-Velez  v.  Board  of  Regents  of  the 

University  System  of  Georgia  et  al.,  ante,  p.  1025; 

No.  09–413.  Husband  v.  United  States,  ante,  p.  1012; 
No.  09–433.  Wills  v.  Potter,  Postmaster  General,  ante, 

p.  1025; 

No.  09–5023.  Maxwell  v.  Arkansas,  ante,  p.  883; 
No.  09–5043.  Hovind  v.  United  States,  ante,  p.  992; 
No. 09–5053.  Gruff v.  Wilson, Warden, et al., ante, p. 884; 
No.  09–5068.  Hallford  v.  California,  ante,  p.  885; 
No.  09–5089.  Gatewood  v.  Outlaw,  Warden,  ante,  p.  993; 
No.  09–5187.  Hoffman  v.  Lincoln  General  Insurance 

et  al.,  ante,  p.  891; 

No.  09–5293.  Letizia  v.  New  York,  ante,  p.  896; 
No.  09–5306.  Lachira  v.  Sutton,  ante,  p.  897; 
No.  09–5308.  In  re  Johnson,  ante,  p.  812; 
No.  09–5346.  Potter  v.  South  Coast  Plumbing  Systems, 

Inc.,  et  al.,  ante,  p.  1026; 

No.  09–5368.  Scott  v.  Hickman,  Warden,  ante,  p.  900; 
No.  09–5475.  Cordell  v.  Sabol,  Warden,  et  al.,  ante, 

p.  905; 

No.  09–5493.  Rogers  v.  Thaler,  Director,  Texas  Depart­
ment  of Criminal  Justice,  Correctional Institutions  Divi­
sion,  ante,  p.  906; 

No.  09–5545.  Gharb  v.  Unitronics  (1989)  (R”G)  Ltd.  et  al., 

ante,  p.  909;