Patent Abstract:
A multi-channel controller uses multiple logic gates and multiple control channels to provide fault tolerant protection against undesired events.

Full Description:
TECHNICAL FIELD 
     The present disclosure relates to multi-channel controls, and particularly to multi-channel protection logic. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     Many control systems have independent protection devices. For example. engine control systems, and particularly multi-channel engine control systems, include overspeed detection systems that detect the occurrence of an overspeed within an engine and trigger an action in response to detecting an overspeed to mitigate the overspeed condition. 
     Protection systems often include redundancy, such that no single point failure in the protection system causes the plant to be unable to protect against an event. Furthermore, protection systems are also designed such that no single point failure inadvertently shuts down the plant. Typically plant control systems use two dedicated plant control-function independent hardware overspeed devices to detect and respond to overspeed conditions. These systems can fail to protect against overspeed if one of the two protection devices fails. 
     In other systems that use a primary control to supplement the protection devices, the protection devices are hardware devices that lack flexibility in self-testing or in changing the implementation. Furthermore, the prior art shared a microprocessor bus between the primary controller and the protection device. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     A multi-channel controller has a first control channel having a first primary controller with a first protection output signal and a first protection device with a first protection output signal. A second control channel has a second primary controller with a second protection output signal and a second protection device with a second protection output signal. A plurality of logic gates connect each of the first primary control output signal, the first protection device output signal, the second primary control output signal, and the second protection device output signal to a controlled device. 
     A method for controlling a multi-channel solenoid includes the steps of detecting an event using at least one of a first protection device, and a second protection device, outputting an event detected signal from each of the first protection device, and the second protection device detecting the event, and activating at least one channel of a multi-channel solenoid. 
     Also disclosed is a method for controlling a multi-channel solenoid by monitoring the current through an overspeed solenoid, and thereby determining the health of a controller and the health of multiple logic gates using a protection device. 
     These and other features of the present invention can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         FIG. 1  illustrates a multi-channel engine controller controlling a stepper motor that adjusts engine fuel flow. 
         FIG. 2  illustrates an example logical configuration for connecting the multi-channel controller of  FIG. 1  to an overspeed protection solenoid. 
         FIG. 3  illustrates the primary operation mode of the example of  FIG. 2 . 
         FIG. 4  illustrates a first example failure mode of the example of  FIG. 2 . 
         FIG. 5  illustrates a second example failure mode of the example of  FIG. 2 . 
         FIG. 6  illustrates a third example failure mode of the example of  FIG. 2 . 
         FIG. 7  illustrates a fourth example failure mode of the example of  FIG. 2 . 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
       FIG. 1  illustrates an example electronic multi-channel engine controller  10 , controlling a stepper motor  20  within a hydromechanical metering unit  19 . The solenoid  22  actuates an overspeed shutoff valve to an engine (not pictured) that reduces or eliminates fuel supply to the engine when a certain condition exceeds a threshold. In the illustrated example, the condition is an engine speed, and the system is referred to as an overspeed protection system. However, it is understood that a similar system could protect against excessive temperature, or other conditions, and fall within the below disclosure. 
     The multi-channel controller  10  includes two channels  12 ,  14  each of which includes a primary controller  30  that controls the engine while the primary controller  30  is healthy (fully functioning). Furthermore, each channel  12 ,  14  includes a microprocessor protection device  40  that includes a backup controller function that assumes control if the primary controller  30  becomes unhealthy. The protection device  40  also provides an overspeed protection control independent of the primary controller  30 . Specifically an overspeed solenoid  22  is activated and shuts off or reduces fuel to the engine when an overspeed condition is detected, thereby eliminating the overspeed condition. When the overspeed condition ends, the overspeed solenoid  22  is deactivated and allows fuel to reach the engine. The illustrated overspeed solenoid  22  is a two coil or two channel solenoid, and either coil activating is sufficient to reduce or eliminate fuel flow to the engine. 
     Between the two primary channels is a cross-channel data link  15  that provides data communications between channels  12 ,  14 . Each channel  12 ,  14  includes an overspeed detection output signal  16  from the corresponding primary controller  30  and the protection device  40  corresponding to the overspeed protection solenoid  22 . Also, each channel  12 ,  14  has a stepper motor output signal  17  from the primary controller  30  and the protection device  40  corresponding to the stepper motor  20  within the hydromechanical metering unit  19 . A cross-channel overspeed vote signal  18  communicates between one channel&#39;s  12 ,  14  protection device  40  and the other channel&#39;s  12 ,  14  primary controller  30 . 
       FIG. 2  illustrates an example logical configuration for connecting the multi-channel controller  10  of  FIG. 1  to the overspeed solenoid  22  while allowing continued overspeed protection in a number of failure modes. Each channel  12 ,  14  of  FIG. 1  has a pair of corresponding sensor inputs  122 ,  124 ,  132 ,  134 . Two sensor inputs  122 ,  124  are accepted by both controllers  30 ,  40  in channel  14  and the other sensor inputs  132 ,  134  are accepted by both controllers  30 ,  40  in channel  12 . The overspeed solenoid  22  has two channels  22   a ,  22   b , each of which has two inputs  142 ,  144 ,  146 ,  148 . When each of the two inputs  142 ,  144 ,  146 ,  148  corresponding to a single channel  22   a ,  22   b  of the overspeed solenoid  22  instructs the overspeed solenoid  22  to restrict fuel to the engine, the overspeed solenoid  22  activates and restricts fuel flow. 
     Also included in the configuration of  FIG. 2  are multiple logic gates  160 - 174 . The logic gates  160 - 174  combine the outputs of the controllers  30 ,  40  thereby ensuring that no single controller  30 ,  40  failure causes the overspeed detection system to fail. The logic gates  160 - 174  are implemented using solid state digital logic circuits. Primary OR gates  168 ,  170  each accept one input from a corresponding primary controller  30  and one input from an alternate OR gate  164 ,  166  (alternately referred to as the cross-channel Overspeed Vote Signal) and output an “activate overspeed solenoid” signal whenever the corresponding primary controller  30  or the alternate OR gate  164 ,  166  indicates an overspeed condition. The overspeed solenoid  22  accepts the output of the primary OR gate  168 ,  170  at each of the primary control inputs  142 ,  148 . 
     Each of the alternate OR gates  164 ,  166  has three inputs  190 ,  192 ,  194 . The first alternate OR gate input  190  is an overspeed detection output of the primary controller  30  in the same channel  12 ,  14  as the alternate OR gate  164 ,  166  and is high whenever the primary controller  30  detects an overspeed. The second alternate OR gate input  192  is an overspeed detection output signal from the protection device  40  of the same channel  12 ,  14  as the alternate OR gate  164 ,  166  and is high whenever an overspeed is detected by the corresponding protection device  40 . The third alternate OR gate input  194  is an output of a channel health control AND gate  172 ,  174  in the same channel  12 ,  14  as the alternate OR gate  164 ,  166 . 
     Each of the channel health control AND gates  172 ,  174  accepts and inverts a primary controller health input  182  and a protection device health input  184 , with each of the inputs being high when the corresponding controller  30 ,  40  is healthy. Due to the inverting of the inputs  182 ,  184 , the output of the channel health control AND gate  172 ,  174  is high only when both the protection device  40  and the primary controller  30  for the corresponding channel  12 ,  14  are unhealthy. Thus, when both controllers  30  and  40  within the same channel are unhealthy, the local channel protection system defaults to a failsafe state of detecting an overspeed in the remote channel. 
     The protection device inputs  144 ,  146  of the overspeed solenoid  22  are connected to the output of backup OR gates  160 ,  162 . Backup OR gates  160 ,  162  accept an overspeed detected input  192  corresponding to the overspeed detection of the protection devices  40 . When the protection device  40  detects an overspeed condition, the overspeed detected input  192  is high. Thus, the backup OR gates  160 ,  162  instruct the overspeed solenoid  22  to activate whenever the protection device  40  detects an overspeed condition. 
     In order to test protection device inputs  144 ,  146  prior to operation backup OR gates  160 ,  162  have inputs  161  from their respective protection devices that allows the channel  14  to activate switch  144  without activating switch  148  and the channel  12  to activate switch  146  without activating switch  142 . 
     Since the protection device  40  is a microprocessor, it is capable of reading and intelligently reacting to self-test signals. A current sensor  200  transmits an analog signal  203  that permits the protection device  40  to monitor current through the overspeed solenoid  22  to determine the health of the protection device and the plurality of Boolean logic gates  160 - 170 . 
     Optionally, it is possible output LSS signals  161  or  192  such that the LSS signals  161 ,  192  pulse width modulate the current command thereby creating a closed loop. 
     Also, the LSS voltage is monitored using signal  202 . Signal  202  is pulled up to a voltage  201  that is less than the voltage required to energize the overspeed solenoid through the switch commanded by input  148 . Thus, the health of the switches controlled by commands  146  and  148 , and the health of the plurality of Boolean logic gates  160 - 170  can be determined by the protection device  40 . 
     Furthermore, for self-test capability for determination of the health of the Boolean logic gates  160 - 170  by the protection device  40 , the following Boolean logic gate signals are monitored by the protection device  40 : switch input  148 , output of the local OR gate  166  (alternately referred to as the local overspeed vote signal), output of the remote OR gate  164  (alternately referred to as the remote overspeed vote signal) and both outputs out of primary controller  30  (the input to primary OR gate  170  and the input to alternate OR gate  166 ). Both outputs from primary controller  30  are passively buffered to prevent faults from propagating from the primary controller  30  to the protection device  40  and the plurality of Boolean logic gates  160 - 170 . 
     In order to announce the results of self-testing, protection device  40  has a data link  32  for reporting self-test results. Primary controller  30  passes the self-test results to an operator of the protected device (alternately referred to as a plant operator). Alternatively, protection device  30  can have a second data link or equivalent output (fault lamp drivers, etc) that announces faults to a plant operator. 
     The data link  32  is also used for coordinating special self-tests during control power-up and plant shutdown with the primary controller  30 . The software is written in the protection device  40  such that the protection device&#39;s  40  normal operating protection algorithm is unchanged by any data transmissions from the primary controller  30 . 
     During a shutdown, the overspeed system  10  can verify its own health by using either channel or both channels  12 ,  14  to shutdown the plant. Such a mode is referred to as a self-test mode. In the self-test mode, the primary controller  30  activates the input to primary OR gate  170  and the protection device  40  activates the self-test overspeed vote signal  161 . Testing both channels ensures that the overspeed solenoid  22  is not wound incorrectly such that the magnetic field of one channel cancels the magnetic field of the other channel. 
     The signal from primary controller  30  to primary OR gate  170  is only used during the self-test mode to prevent a single in-range failure within the plant sensor inputs  132 ,  134  inadvertently activating the overspeed solenoid  22  during normal operations. 
     The microprocessor systems of the primary controller  30  and the protection device  40  include disable signals from independent monitors within the microprocessors. Whenever a microprocessor-based monitor detects a fault, the outputs from that microprocessor are disabled such that the microprocessor does not detect for an overspeed. The disable signals are used to generate primary controller health signal  182  and protection device health signal  184 . As stated earlier, when both controllers  30  and  40  within the same channel are unhealthy, the local channel protection system defaults to a failsafe state of detecting for an overspeed in the remote channel. 
     Operation of the two channel  12 ,  14 , four controller  30 ,  40  system is disclosed in greater detail below with regards to  FIGS. 3-7 , each of which describes a particular operation mode of the example configuration of  FIG. 2 . 
       FIG. 3  illustrates the primary operation protection mode of the multi-channel controller  10  with all four of the controllers  30 ,  40  being healthy. In  FIG. 3 , each of the protection devices  40  detects an overspeed condition based on the sensor inputs  122 ,  124 , 132 ,  134  and outputs an overspeed detected signal  192  to the backup OR gates  160 ,  162 , causing the backup OR gates  160 ,  162  to output an overspeed detected signal to the protection device inputs  144 ,  146 . 
     The overspeed detected input  192  is also sent to the alternate OR gates  164 ,  166 . Since each of the alternate OR gates  164 ,  166  has at least one signal indicating that the overspeed solenoid  22  should be activated, the alternate OR gates  164 ,  166  each also output a high signal indicating that the overspeed solenoid  22  should be activated. The outputs of the alternate OR gates  164 ,  166  are received by the primary OR gates  168 ,  170 , causing the primary OR gates  168 ,  170  to output a signal activating the overspeed solenoid  22  to the overspeed solenoid inputs  148 ,  142 . 
     Thus, when all four controllers  30 ,  40  are operating and healthy and an overspeed condition is detected, the overspeed solenoid receives an input signal at two inputs  142 ,  144 ,  146 ,  148  at each of the channels  22   a ,  22   b  instructing activation of the overspeed solenoid  22 . 
     While it is desirable that all four of the controllers  30 ,  40  are operating, and therefore at least two of the four controllers  30 ,  40  detect any event, it is understood that during standard operation, controllers can fail. The below descriptions illustrate how the system can continue functioning in a number of failure modes. 
       FIG. 4  illustrates an alternate operation mode of the multi-channel controller  10  with all four of the controllers  30 ,  40  being healthy. Additionally, the operational mode of  FIG. 4  functions when the primary controller  30  in one channel  12  and/or the protection device  40  in the other channel  14  are unhealthy (non-functional). In  FIG. 4 , the primary controller  30  that is healthy outputs an overspeed detected signal to the alternate OR gate  164  corresponding to the healthy primary controller  30 . The alternate OR gate  164  then outputs an overspeed detected signal to the primary OR gate  170  corresponding to the opposite channel  12  having an unhealthy primary controller  30 , causing the primary OR gate  170  to output an overspeed detected signal to the overspeed solenoid input  148 . 
     Likewise, the protection device  40  that is healthy outputs an overspeed detected signal  192  to the backup OR gate  162  in the channel  12  corresponding to the healthy protection device  40 . The backup OR gate  162  outputs an overspeed detected signal to the backup overspeed solenoid  22  input  146 , thus ensuring that both inputs in a single channel  22   a  of the overspeed solenoid  22  receive an activation input in response to the detection of an overspeed event. The overspeed solenoid  22  is fully operational as long as a single channel  22   a  is operational, the primary overspeed solenoid input  148  and the backup overspeed solenoid input  146  are sufficient to activate the overspeed solenoid  22 . 
       FIG. 5  illustrates an alternate operation mode of the multi-channel controller  10  where both speed sensors for one of the channels  14  ceases operating. When both speed sensor inputs  122 ,  124  cease operating, and the primary controller  30  is healthy, the primary controller  30  assumes an overspeed condition in order to force a failsafe mode. The primary controller  30  of the channel  14  with the failed speed sensors outputs an overspeed detected signal to the alternate OR gate  164  corresponding to the channel  14  with the failed speed sensor. Since at least one of the alternate OR gate&#39;s  164  inputs indicates an overspeed condition, the alternate OR gate  164  outputs an overspeed detected signal to the primary OR gate  170  in the opposite control channel  12 . The primary OR gate  170  then continuously outputs an overspeed detected signal to the overspeed solenoid  22  via the primary overspeed solenoid input  148  as long as the speed sensor is in a failure state. 
     The protection device  40  in the channel  12  corresponding to the healthy speed sensor only outputs an overspeed detected signal when an actual overspeed event is detected. The overspeed detected signal is output to the backup OR gate  162 , which then outputs an overspeed detected signal to the overspeed solenoid  22  input  146 . Once two overspeed detected signals are received at a single channel  22   a  of the overspeed solenoid  22 , the overspeed solenoid  22  activates, and the overspeed event is protected against. In this failure mode, the overspeed solenoid  22  receives two overspeed detected signals to a single channel  12 ,  14  when an overspeed condition exists, despite the overspeed sensors being dead to the other channel  12 ,  14 . 
       FIG. 6  illustrates an alternate mode of operation of the multi-channel stepper motor controller  10  where one control channel  14  enters a dual failure mode and entirely ceases operation. When the channel  14  enters failure mode, both the primary controller health input  182  and protection device health input  184  to the channel health control AND gate  174  cease indicating that the corresponding controller  30 ,  40  is healthy. Both of the inputs to the channel health control AND gate  174  are inverted, and the AND gate sees two positive signals and outputs an overspeed detected signal to the alternate OR gate  164  corresponding to the failed channel  14 . The overspeed detected signal is the default signal for a failure channel  12 ,  14 . 
     As the alternate OR gate  164  has at least one input indicating an overspeed condition, the alternate OR gate  164  outputs a signal indicating an overspeed condition to the primary OR gate  170  corresponding to the currently healthy control channel  12 . The primary OR gate  170  then outputs an overspeed detected signal to the overspeed solenoid  22  input  148 . As with the example of  FIG. 5 , the overspeed solenoid  22  only activates when both the primary input  148  and the backup input  146  of a single channel  22   a  indicate an overspeed condition. 
     When the protection device  40  in the functional channel  12  detects an overspeed condition, the protection device  40  outputs an overspeed detected signal to the corresponding backup OR gate  162 . The backup OR gate  162  then outputs an overspeed detected signal to the backup overspeed detected input  146  of the overspeed solenoid  22 , thus providing both needed inputs  146 ,  148  to activate the overspeed solenoid  22  in the case of an overspeed event. 
     An alternate failure mode to one of the controllers  30 ,  40  or one of the control channels  12 ,  14  failing is that cross-channel overspeed vote signal between the two channels  12 ,  14  is disrupted due to a severed electrical connection.  FIG. 7  illustrates an example where the communication between one of the control channels  14  is severed from the other control channel  12 . As can be seen in  FIG. 7 , the link between alternate OR gate  164  corresponding to control channel  14  and the primary OR gate  170  is severed. The primary OR gate  170  is configured such that when the link to the input corresponding to the alternate OR gate  164  of the opposite control channel  14  is severed, the input defaults to an overspeed detected input, thus causing the primary OR gate  170  to output an overspeed detected signal to the primary overspeed protection solenoid input  148 . 
     Similarly, if power is lost to one channel  14  causing a gross failure in that channel, then the primary OR gate  170 &#39;s input in channel  12  from channel  14 &#39;s alternate OR gate  164  defaults to an overspeed event. 
     The input for the protection device input  146  to the overspeed solenoid  22  is provided in an identical fashion as was previously described with regards to the dual or gross failure mode example of  FIG. 6 . Thus, at least one channel receives the two inputs  146 ,  148  needed to activate the overspeed solenoid  22 . 
     As can be seen in the illustrations of  FIGS. 4-7 , the failure modes in each example Figure are symmetrical, with opposite failures from the ones described resulting in the same functionality. 
     Although an example of this invention has been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.

Technology Classification (CPC): 6