Patent Abstract:
Disclosed is a PWM rectifier in which switching losses in a semiconductor device are reduced without degrading the response of a control system. In a PWM overmodulation region, the modulation scheme is set to a three-phase modulation scheme. In other regions, a switchover condition such as the amplitude of an input current is acquired and compared with a switchover level. If the switchover condition equals or exceeds the switchover level, the modulation scheme is switched over to a modified two-phase modulation scheme which reduces the number of switching operations to two thirds for the same PWM frequency.

Full Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
       [0001]    1. Field of the Invention 
         [0002]    The present invention relates to a pulse-width modulated (PWM) rectifier for converting a three-phase alternating current into a direct current by using a semiconductor device whose switching operation is controlled by a PWM signal. 
         [0003]    2. Description of the Related Art 
         [0004]    In a motor control apparatus that drives a machine tool, industrial machine, robot, or the like, a converter (rectifier) is used to convert commercial power into DC power then supplies the DC power to an inverter that drives the motor. 
         [0005]    In recent years, rectifiers using pulse-width modulation (PWM) are being widely used because of the need to reduce power supply harmonics and reactive power. In a PWM rectifier, switching losses occur because high-speed switching is performed using a semiconductor device. Accordingly, this type of rectifier has the problem that, compared with conventional rectifiers based on diodes, losses in the power converter increase and the size of the converter thus increases. 
         [0006]    To solve this problem, the prior art has employed a method that reduces the PWM frequency in regions where the amplitude of the current is large. This method is effective in reducing losses in the power converter and suppressing the increase in the converter size. 
         [0007]    However, the prior art method has had the disadvantage that the response of the control system degrades because the feedback sampling period becomes longer as the PWM frequency decreases. 
         [0008]    JP9-252581A discloses a method in which the carrier frequency of the rectifier (PWM converter) is varied. Further, JP2004-48885A and JP63-290170A each disclose a power converter that produces power from DC voltage by pulse modulation and supplies the power to a load, such as an electric motor, with provisions made to switch the modulation scheme between a three-phase modulation scheme and a two-phase modulation scheme (more properly, a modified two-phase modulation scheme: Refer to “PWM Power Conversion System” by Katsunori Taniguchi, Kyoritsu Publishing Co., Ltd, PP. 96-98). JP2008-259343A discloses a converter-inverter constructed by connecting an inverter to a converter, with provisions made to employ the modified two-phase modulation scheme as the PWM modulation scheme for either the converter or the inverter. 
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
       [0009]    An object of the invention is to provide a PWM rectifier wherein switching losses in a semiconductor device are reduced without degrading the response of a control system. 
         [0010]    According to the present invention, there is provided a pulse-width modulated (PWM) rectifier for converting a three-phase alternating current into direct current by using a semiconductor device which is controlled by a PWM signal, comprising: a control unit which generates the PWM signal in accordance with a three-phase modulation scheme in which a first PWM voltage command synchronized to the three-phase alternating current is created based on a difference between an output voltage of the PWM rectifier and a target value thereof and in which the PWM signal is generated by comparing the first PWM voltage command with a PWM carrier having a constant amplitude and constant frequency, or a modified two-phase modulation scheme in which the PWM signal is generated by comparing with the PWM carrier a second PWM voltage command created by saturating one phase selected from among three phases constituting the first PWM voltage command in the three-phase modulation scheme to a maximum or minimum value of the PWM and by applying an increase or decrease, required to achieve the saturation, to the other two phases; a detecting unit which detects at least one parameter selected from among an input current, output current, input power, and output power of the PWM rectifier and a temperature of the semiconductor device; and a modulation scheme switching unit which compares a detection value from the detecting unit with a predetermined threshold value and, if the detection value is larger than the threshold value, switches the modulation scheme used in the control unit from a three-phase modulation scheme to a modified two-phase modulation scheme. 
         [0011]    In regions where current is relatively weak, the three-phase modulation scheme is employed in order to minimize current ripple, while in regions where the amplitude of the current is strong and heating (due to switching losses) becomes a problem, the modulation scheme is switched to the modified two-phase modulation scheme, thereby reducing the number of switching operations to two thirds for the same PWM frequency, and the switching losses thus decrease. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         [0012]      FIG. 1  is a block diagram showing the configuration of a PWM rectifier according to one embodiment of the present invention; 
           [0013]      FIG. 2  is a waveform diagram explaining how a PWM signal is generated by comparing a PWM voltage command with a PWM carrier; 
           [0014]      FIG. 3  is a waveform diagram explaining modulation percentage and overmodulation; 
           [0015]      FIG. 4  is a waveform diagram explaining one example of a modified two-phase modulation scheme; 
           [0016]      FIG. 5  is a flowchart illustrating a modulation scheme setting procedure; 
           [0017]      FIG. 6  is a graph showing the relationship between the modulation percentage and the harmonic current rms value in the three-phase modulation scheme and the modified two-phase modulation scheme for comparison; 
           [0018]      FIG. 7  is a waveform diagram explaining a second example of the modified two-phase modulation scheme; 
           [0019]      FIG. 8  is a waveform diagram explaining a third example of the modified two-phase modulation scheme; and 
           [0020]      FIG. 9  is a waveform diagram explaining a fourth example of the modified two-phase modulation scheme. 
       
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
       [0021]      FIG. 1  is a block diagram showing the configuration of a PWM rectifier according to one embodiment of the present invention. 
         [0022]    In the PWM rectifier, a main circuit section  10  includes transistors  12  to  17 , diodes  18  to  23 , and a smoothing capacitor  24  connected as shown. The input side of the main circuit section  10  is connected to a three-phase power supply  30  via an AC reactor  26  and a current transformer  28 , and the output side is connected to a load  32  such as a PWM inverter. 
         [0023]    An adder  36  outputs a difference (voltage difference) representing the deviation of the output voltage of the PWM rectifier, i.e., the voltage across the smoothing capacitor  24 , from a voltage command. A voltage control unit  34  takes as inputs the voltage difference supplied from the adder  36  and the voltage from the three-phase power supply  30 , and outputs a current command which is a signal synchronized to the three-phase power supply and having an amplitude proportional to the voltage difference. An adder  38  outputs a difference (current difference) representing the deviation of the current detected at the current transformer  28  from the current command. 
         [0024]    When the modulation scheme selected by a modulation scheme setting unit  42  is a three-phase modulation scheme, a current control unit  40  takes the current difference itself as a PWM voltage command, compares it with a PWM carrier having a constant amplitude and constant frequency, and outputs the result of the comparison as a PWM signal for controlling the transistors  12  to  17 . On the other hand, when the modulation scheme selected by the modulation scheme setting unit  42  is a modified two-phase modulation scheme, the PWM voltage command generated in accordance with the modified two-phase modulation scheme as will be described later is compared with the PWM carrier, and the result of the comparison is output as the PWM signal. 
         [0025]    Referring to  FIG. 2 , a description will be given of how the PWM signal is generated by comparing the PWM voltage command with the PWM carrier. In  FIG. 2 , PWM voltage commands for R phase, S phase, and T phase in the three-phase modulation scheme are indicated by solid lines, and the PWM carrier to be compared with them is indicated by a dashed line. The PWM voltage command for each phase is compared with the triangular-wave PWM carrier, and if the PWM voltage command is larger, the upper transistor  12 ,  14 , or  16  in  FIG. 1  is turned on and the lower transistor  13 ,  15 , or  17  is turned off; on the other hand, if the PWM voltage command is smaller, the lower transistor  13 ,  15 , or  17  is turned on and the upper transistor  12 ,  14 , or  16  is turned off. As the value of the PWM voltage command for each phase varies, the ON period of each transistor connected to that phase varies; that is, as the value of the PWM voltage approaches the maximum value of the PWM carrier, the ON period of the upper transistor connected to that phase increases, and as it approaches the minimum value, the ON period of the lower transistor connected to that phase increases. 
         [0026]    In PWM modulation, the modulation percentage (PWM modulation percentage) is defined by the following equation. 
         [0000]      PWM modulation percentage (%)=(Amplitude of PWM voltage command)/(Amplitude of PWM carrier)×100  (1) 
         [0027]    In PWM overmodulation regions where the PWM modulation percentage exceeds 100%, as shown in  FIG. 3 , the number of switching operations decreases because the switching stops in the section where the PWM voltage command is larger than the maximum value of the PWM carrier as well as in the section where the PWM voltage command is smaller than the minimum value of the PWM carrier. In the example of  FIG. 3 , for R phase, for example, the PWM voltage command exceeds the maximum value in the section where the phase is 60° to 120°, and becomes smaller than the minimum value in the section where the phase is 240° to 300°, and the switching stops in these sections. 
         [0028]    Next, the modified two-phase modulation scheme will be described. In the modified two-phase modulation scheme, the PWM voltage command for one of the three phases in the three-phase modulation is saturated to the maximum or minimum value of the PWM carrier, and the resulting increase or decrease is equally applied to the other two phases to create the respective PWM voltage commands. In the example shown in  FIG. 4 , in the section where the phase is 0° to 60°, the PWM voltage command for S phase in part (b) of the figure is saturated to the minimum value of the PWM carrier and, in the section where the phase is 60° to 120°, the PWM voltage command for R phase in part (a) is saturated to the maximum value of the PWM carrier. Since, in any section, one of the three phases is saturated to the maximum or minimum value of the PWM carrier, and the switching stops, the number of switching operations of the transistors  12  to  17  decreases to two thirds of that in the three-phase modulation scheme, and the switching losses thus decrease. 
         [0029]      FIG. 5  shows one example of a modulation scheme setting procedure in the modulation scheme setting unit  42  ( FIG. 1 ). In the initial state, the three-phase modulation scheme which reduces current ripple is selected as the modulation scheme. In the modulation scheme setting procedure, first the modulation percentage defined by equation (1) is checked whether it exceeds 100% or not, i.e., whether it is in the PWM overmodulation state or not (step  1000 ); if it is in the PWM overmodulation state, the modulation scheme is set to the usual three-phase modulation scheme (step  1002 ). 
         [0030]    If it is not in the PWM overmodulation state, then the condition based on which to effect switchover to the modified two-phase modulation scheme is acquired (step  1004 ), and the acquired switchover condition is compared with a switchover level (step  1006 ). If the acquired switchover condition equals or exceeds the switchover level, the modulation scheme is set to the modified two-phase modulation scheme (step  1008 ). Next, the switchover condition is compared with (switchover level—hysteresis) (step  1010 ); if the former is equal to or less than the latter, the modulation scheme is set to the three-phase modulation scheme. That is, hysteresis is provided in the switchover decision step performed using the switchover condition. 
         [0031]    The switchover condition is preferably the amplitude of the input current acquired by the current transformer in  FIG. 1 . If the amplitude of the input current is stronger than the amplitude switchover level, switching is made to the modified two-phase modulation scheme, but if it is not stronger than (switchover level—hysteresis), switching is made to the three-phase modulation scheme. Alternatively, the switchover condition may be selected from among the amplitude of the input current, the temperature acquired from a temperature sensor (not shown) provided near the transistors  12  to  17 , the output current acquired from a current sensor not shown, the input power, and the output power, or a combination of some of these switchover conditions may be used. When making a switchover decision using a combination of a plurality of decision conditions, it is preferable to make provisions so that if any one of the decision conditions exceeds its corresponding decision level, switching is made to the modified two-phase modulation scheme, and if none of the decision conditions exceed their corresponding (switchover level—hysteresis) values, switching is made to the three-phase modulation scheme. 
         [0032]    In the above example, the usual three-phase modulation scheme is employed in regions where the current amplitude is weak; however, a scheme that superimposes on the voltage command a compensation signal having a frequency three times that of the voltage command, i.e., a scheme generally known as the third harmonic injection scheme, may be employed. 
         [0033]      FIG. 6  shows a relationship, derived through simulation, between the modulation percentage and the harmonic current rms value in the three-phase modulation scheme and the modified two-phase modulation scheme for comparison. Since the number of switching operations in the modified two-phase modulation scheme decreases to two thirds of that in the three-phase modulation scheme, the number of switching operations in the modified two-phase modulation scheme for a PWM frequency of 6 kHz is equivalent to that in the three-phase modulation scheme for a PWM frequency of 4 kHz. However, as shown in  FIG. 6 , in the PWM overmodulation region where the modulation percentage exceeds 100%, the characteristic degrades in the modified two-phase modulation scheme compared with the three-phase modulation scheme. It will, however, be noted that in the PWM overmodulation region, the number of switching operations decreases even in the three-phase modulation scheme, as earlier described with reference to  FIG. 3 . 
         [0034]    It is therefore desirable to maintain the three-phase modulation scheme in the PWM overmodulation region even if the switchover condition exceeds the switchover level, as described with reference to  FIG. 5 . 
         [0035]      FIGS. 7 to 9  show other examples of the modified two-phase modulation scheme. In the example shown in  FIG. 7 , of the PWM voltage commands for R phase, S phase, and T phase, the strongest voltage command is saturated to the level equivalent to the maximum value of the PWM carrier, and the resulting increase is applied to the other two phases. In the example shown in  FIG. 8 , of the PWM voltage commands for R phase, S phase, and T phase, the weakest voltage command is saturated to the level equivalent to the minimum value of the PWM carrier, and the resulting decrease is applied to the other two phases. In the example shown in  FIG. 9 , the process of saturating the strongest voltage command to the level equivalent to the maximum value of the PWM carrier, as shown in  FIG. 7 , and the process of saturating the weakest voltage command to the level equivalent to the minimum value of the PWM carrier, as shown in  FIG. 8 , are repeated alternately. While  FIG. 9  shows that the repetition period is set twice the period of the carrier and the two are synchronized to each other, the repetition period need not be set twice or an integral multiple of the period of the carrier or it is not necessary that they synchronized to each other.

Technology Classification (CPC): 7