Patent Abstract:
A coal pellet which disintegrates in the presence of excess heat and comprises coal particles, water soluble binder and water. The binder is first dissolved in water and then coal particles are blended with the aqueous binder solution. The blend is agitated until pellets are formed and then the pellets are coated with a water resistant film. The coal pellets have water entrained therein which is converted to a gaseous form when the pellets are subjected to heat thereby facilitating the heat induced bursting of the pellets to free the coal particles for more efficient burning.

Full Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     With the development of increasingly mechanized systems for the mining, preparation and transportation of coal has come an increase in the quantity of fine coal particles produced. Such fine coal particles, commonly known as coal dust, are often lost during coal handling. Both wind and flowing water readily carry coal dust away. Coal losses due to wind and water are often substantial and add directly to the costs of coal as a fuel. 
     Ironically, once coal has been transported to an industrial site for usage, it often must be pulverized before burning. Pulverized coal forms fine particles similar to coal dust in many respects. Because of the high surface to volume ratios of coal particles, the coal itself has greater contact with atmospheric oxygen when in particulate form. This physical characteristic of coal particles explains, at least in part, the desirability of feeding industrial furnaces with pulverized coal rather than larger coal fragments. In other words, fine coal particles burn more efficiently than larger coal fragments. 
     Prior art in the field of this invention has been primarily directed toward the alleviation of coal dust losses by capturing the coal dust before its dispersal in the environment and then converting it into a stable form. In U.S. Pat. No. 3,655,350, issued to Utley in 1972, coal pellets with certain desirable characteristics were produced. These pellets contained coal dust, coal tar pitch and less than ten percent water. The pellets produced were reasonably stable to crushing and impact forces as well as resistant to water induced degradation. Drying the pellets in a fluid bed dryer for forty seconds at seven hundred and fifty degrees did not adversely affect pellet structure nor cause substantial losses of physical stability. Pellets using bentonite clay as a binder were found to have little resistance to destruction by water. 
     In U.S. Pat. No. 3,377,146, issued to von Stroh in 1968, a coal pellet containing coal dust and lignosulfonate binder is produced. The binder is a water soluble lignin derivative and serves to facilitate pellet formation. The resultant pellets were found to withstand temperatures of fourteen hundred degrees without loss of hardness. 
     In U.S. Pat. No. 4,025,596, issued to Parks, et al. in 1977, a method of pelletizing fine particles using a non-water soluble latex polymer and a hydrophilic agglutinant is taught. In some cases polyethylene glycol was used as an agglutinant along with a latex binder and fine coal particles. Pellets produced were dried, as example 1 indicates, at 200° F. for two hours. 
     As indicated by reports on agglomeration (Chemical Engineering, October 1951, 161-65 and Chemical Engineering, Dec. 4, 1967, 147-69) and by the common knowledge of practicioners of the art, the most frequently used coal particle binders in the past have been hydrophobic substances such as petroleum asphalt and coal tar or sometimes bentonite clays. Such pellets, although stable, are prone to burn inefficiently as compared to pulverized coal and also to sometimes produce noxious gases and become gummy when subjected to heat. In some cases excessive ash is produced. Such pellets, for efficient industrial combustion, must be first mechanically pulverized back to fine coal particles. 
     It is an object of the present invention to produce a stable coal pellet from fine coal particles which might otherwise be lost during coal preparation and transportation. 
     Yet another object of this invention is to produce a coal pellet which will burst into combustible coal dust particles upon subjection to heat such as during injection into a furnace. 
     Other objects and advantages of this invention will be evident from the following description of the preferred embodiment and accompanying tabular data. 
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT 
     The method of the present invention is particularly adapted to produce a pellet which is self-bursting upon the application of heat. Following the method of the present invention, coal particles in the form of coal dust, water and a water soluble binder are blended, the mixture is agitated until substantially homogeneous pellets are formed. The agitation is effectively accomplished by tumbling the blended mixture in an enclosed container. The pellets are then aged for a period of time sufficient to allow evaporation of at least part of the water near the pellet surface and thereby physically stabilize the pellet structure, rendering the pellets resistant to damage by impact and crushing forces. The physical stability of the pellets to impact and crushing forces allows the pellets to be transported and handled without loss of pellet structure. Resistance to impact forces allows the pellets to be dropped a distance without breaking. Resistance to crushing forces permits the pellets to withstand weight resting upon them without breaking. The resulting pellets comprise and coal particles water and water soluble binder. The water and the water soluble binder cooperate to bind the particles of coal in a manner forming the pellets and with an amount of water entrained in the pellet. When the pellets formed using the method of the present invention are subjected to heat they burst and disintegrate into coal particles. The heat causes conversion of entrained water into gaseous form and the binding forces of the water soluble binder to be lessened. The net effect of the pellet bursting is the formation of coal particles for efficient combustion. 
     The most effective binders have been found to be water soluble hydrophilic organic polymers such as polyethyleneglycol, methoxypolyethylene glycol and carboxymethylcellulose. Any organic polymers having an abundance of polar atoms such as oxygen or nitrogen are considered hydrophilic in character. 
     When pellets are coated with a polymeric film their resistance to water damage is facilitated. Pellet coating procedures includes dipping uncoated pellets in a film forming solution and spraying uncoated pellets with a film forming solution. Carboxymethylcellulose cross-linked by ion bridges between some of its carboxyl groups forms an effective polymeric film. Cross-linking agents such as aluminum ions from aluminum acetate and chromium ions from chromium potassium sulfate form cross-links and facilitate carboxymethylcellulose film formation. Once the pellets have been coated with film their resistance to structural damage by subsequent exposure to water is greatly enhanced. Coating the peripheral pellet surface with a water resistant coating however does not alter the heat induced bursting qualities of the pellets or their resistance to impact and crushing forces. 
     Characteristics of coal pellets produced by the method of the present invention are seen in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4. These tables deal respectively with the effects of a variety of pelletizing conditions upon pellet yield, drop index, crushing strength and water resistance. The pellets tested were produced by the following procedures with the indicated ingredients. 
     The coal used in these tests was of the bituminous type known as Stigler coal which is surface mined in Haskell County, Okla. and is typically of low to medium volatile rank and with a low sulfur and ash content. Raw coal was ground, dried and passed through a 200 mesh sieve. The coal particles passing through the sieve were used in the production of coal pellets. The water soluble binder used in the bulk of these experiments was a polyethylene glycol (Carbowax, melting at about 63° C., polyethylene glycol 6000, Union Carbide, Inc.). An aqueous solution of water soluble binder was prepared as follows: in one case, 4.4 grams of polyethylene glycol (subsequently PEG) was added to 25 milliliters of water and the mixture was warmed and agitated for a short period of time until a solution was obtained and then allowed to return to room temperature; and in another case, 8.33 grams of PEG was analogously utilized. 
     Coal pellets were produced by separately using each of the above PEG solutions. Twenty five grams of each PEG solution was separately scattered over the surface of a 100 gram sample of coal particles in a rotating variable speed mixer. The combination was then mixed until the materials were blended (3% PEG and 17% water by weight or 5% PEG and 15% water by weight). The blend was then placed in an agglomerating or balling drum with a diameter of about ten inches. The drum was then rotated at thirty revolutions per minute in one case and fifty revolutions per minute (RPM) in another case to produce pellets by agitation. The effects of temperature during the drum revolution and tumbling of the enclosed blend were studied by blowing air at 90° C. at the rear and closed side of the drum during the drum rotation at either speed and at either PEG concentration. The rotating drum was kept in other cases at about 21° C. In all cases studied, many generally spherical pellets were formed within one minute of drum rotation. The contents of the rotating drum were removed after 5 minutes of rotation and placed on an 8 mesh sieve. Pellets retained on the 8 mesh sieve were used for subsequent tests and procedures. The entire experiment was replicated, the results of the first experiment being seen in the tables as numbers not appended by an &#34;r&#34;, and those of the replicate experiment being seen in the tables as numbers followed by an &#34;r&#34;. Table 1 contains data on the yield of pellets retained by the 8 mesh sieve after removal from the rotating drum. The higher temperature (90° C.) of agglomeration combined with higher speed of rotation (50 RPM) combine to reduce the yield to some extent. The highest average yield was produced by the low binder (3% PEG) concentration, low RPM and high temperature. 
     
                       TABLE 1______________________________________CONDITIONS    PEG                Temp  YIELDNo.      %      RPM         C.°                             Grams______________________________________1        3      30          21    691r       3      30          21    672        5      30          21    582r       5      30          21    533        3      50          21    643r       3      50          21    654        5      50          21    454r       5      50          21    565        3      30          90    855r       3      30          90    786        5      30          90    716r       5      30          90    567        3      50          90    607r       3      50          90    608        5      50          90    598r       5      50          90    54______________________________________ 
    
     The coal pellets retained on the 8 mesh sieve were then either promptly measured for physical characteristics (raw) or first subjected to warming for fifteen minutes at 90° C. (warm). Both raw and warm pellets were tested and then subjected to aging for two days under ambient laboratory conditions before subsequent testing. 
     Some aged pellets of different types were coated by immersion in a freshly prepared solution of 50 milliliters water, 0.5 grams of carboxymethylcellulose (Type 7L, Hercules, Inc.) and 0.15 grams chromium potassium sulfate (chrome alum, CrK (SO 4 ) 2 .12 H 2  O) followed by their prompt removal and drying at about 120° C. (usually for about fifteen minutes). 
     
                       TABLE 2______________________________________Drop Index                       Raw   WarmNo.      Raw    Warm        Aged  Aged______________________________________1        22     3           e      251r       14     20          e     e2        25     12          e     e2r       18     16          e     e3        25     7           e     e3r       23     7           e     e4        25     25          e     e4r       25     22          e     e5        12     9            20   e5r       10     6           e     e6        21     19           21   e6r       25     11          e     e7        24     13          e     e7r       12     19          e     e8        25     8           e     e8r       25     20          e     e______________________________________ 
    
     Uncoated pellets were measured for resistance to breakage after an 18 inch drop onto a 1/2 inch steel plate. Several pellets of average size were dropped until they broke or survived more than 25 drops, in which case they were deemed elastic, abbreviated `e` in Table 2. The Drop Index in Table 2 indicates the average number of drops required to break the pellets. The conditions corresponding to each test number in Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 are the same as in Table 1. The data shows that both the higher binder concentration and the higher speed of drum rotation tended to produce pellets more resistant to breakage by the 18 inch drop. 
     
                       TABLE 3______________________________________Crushing Strength                       Raw   WarmNo.      Raw    Warm        Aged  Aged______________________________________1        0.1    0.2         2.01  0.931r       p      0.6         2.62  1.252        p      0.6         4.77  2.072r       p      0.3         3.29  1.573        p      0.3         2.66  2.053r       p      0.2         2.46  1.714        p      0.9         4.76  2.964r       p      0.5         4.03  2.985        0.1    0.3         0.82  1.745r       0.1    0.2         2.18  2.076        p      0.4         3.06  2.356r       p      0.3         4.03   .917        0.2    0.3         2.21  1.967r       p      0.5         2.32  1.588        p      0.2         4.16  1.558r       p      0.6         4.91  2.12______________________________________ 
    
     The crushing strength of the uncoated pellets was measured for several single pellets of each type by determining the vertical weight which a single pellet could support before being crushed. The average crushing strength of these pellets is represented in Table 3 as the average number of kilograms of weight required to crush a single pellet. The raw pellets fresh from the drum often were plastic (abbreviated `p` in Table 3), deforming but not breaking. The higher binder concentration tended to produce pellets with the greatest crushing strength. 
     Both Table 2 and Table 3 indicate that aging for two days dramatically increases the physical strength of the pellets, rendering them stable enough for transportation. Coating was not found to appreciably alter the drop index or the crushing strength of the pellets (not seen in the Tables). 
     Coated as well as uncoated pellets were measured for resistance to water damage by immersing them in water for fifteen minutes and then draining, drying and counting the surviving undamaged pellets. The data in Table 4 indicates the percentage of pellets able to survive the water immersion intact. Coating the pellets conferred a profound improvement in their resistance to water damage. 
     
                       TABLE 4______________________________________Water Resistance                 Coated                  Raw    Warm  Raw   WarmNo.    Raw     Warm    Aged   Aged  Aged  Aged______________________________________1      0       0       0      0     90    901r     10      40      0      78    95    952      10      25      10     10    100   902r     10      30      0      0     100   1003      20      0       0      10    100   1003r     15      15      0      15    100   1004      10      10      5      10    100   704r     10      20      0      0     100   1005      25      20      15     10    100   955r     10      20      0      5     100   1006      0       10      0      10    85    956r     10      10      0      0     100   957      10      10      0      10    85    1007r     10      30      30     0     100   958      0       10      0      0     90    908r     15      10      0      0     100   90______________________________________ 
    
     All pellets, coated or uncoated were found to promptly burst when held in a hot environment (generally over 400° C.), thereby returning largely to coal particles within about two seconds. This bursting quality was retained during at least nine months of storage in glass jars. 
     Carboxymethylcellulose was used as a water soluble hydrophilic binder in place of the polyethylene glycol in several preliminary tests. An aqueous solution containing 5% carboxymethylcellulose (Type 7L, Hercules, Inc.) by weight was first prepared. Twenty-five grams of this solution was blended with 100 grams of coal particles. After agitation for five minutes in an agglomeration drum, pellets were formed. The pellets were removed and sprayed with a 0.3% aqueous solution of chromium potassium sulfate. The pellets, after drying for two days were found to have a low crushing strength, but did still burst upon the application of heat. After storage for over nine months the crushing strength of the pellets was considerably improved. This information indicates that most hydrophilic polymers such as methoxypolyethylene glycol which are soluble in water should function as binders for self-bursting coal pellets. 
     Changes may be made in the procedures, the sequence of method steps or in the specific ingredients described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as described in the following claims.

Technology Classification (CPC): 2