Patent Abstract:
A digital communications test system and method for testing a plurality of devices under test (DUTs) in which multiple sets of a single vector signal analyzer (VSA) and single vector signal generator (VSG) can be used together to perform error vector magnitude (EVM) measurements for one or more DUTs in parallel, including one or more of composite, switched and multiple input multiple output (MIMO) EVM measurements. This allows N pairs of a VSA and VSG to test N DUTs with N×N MIMO in substantially the sane time as a single VSA and VSG pair can test a single DUT, thereby allowing a substantial increase in testing throughput as compared to that possible with only a single VSA and VSG set.

Full Description:
RELATED APPLICATION DATA 
     This application is a divisional application based on U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/985,848, filed Jan. 6, 2011 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,228,087 entitled Digital Communications Test System for Multiple Input, Multiple Output (MIMO) Systems, which claims priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/348,992, filed Jan. 6, 2009 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,948,254, entitled Digital Communications Test System for Multiple Input, Multiple Output (MIMO) Systems, which claims priority from and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/116,510, filed Nov. 20, 2008, which prior application is hereby incorporated herein by reference. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     The present invention relates to digital communications test systems, and in particular, to test systems for testing multiple input, multiple output (“MIMO”) systems. 
     2. Related Art 
     Testing of MIMO systems with multiple channels using conventional test equipment presents a number of challenges. Generally, multiple test instruments are required and must be synchronized in frequency and time to produce and analyze the MIMO signals of a device under test (DUT). One example of such a system is the “IQn×n” test system designed, manufactured and sold by LitePoint Corporation of Sunnyvale, Calif. Such a system uses multiple vector signal analyzers (VSAs) and vector signal generators (VSGs). However, one disadvantage of such a system is the additional cost of multiple VSAs and VSGs, which often makes use of such systems cost prohibitive for manufacturing in which multiple such systems are required. Accordingly, to minimize costs during manufacturing tests, solutions have been developed allowing the test of a MIMO DUT using a single VSA and single VSG. Such solutions focus on testing the DUT transmitter using a single VSA. Examples include composite error vector magnitude (EVM) analysis or switched EVM analysis. One example of a composite EVM test system and method can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/533,971, filed Sep. 21, 2006, and entitled “Apparatus and Method for Simultaneous Testing of Multiple Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexed Transmitters With Single Vector Signal Analyzer” (the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference). 
     Alternatively, switched EVM testing can be performed in which the output of each transmitter can be captured individually by switching the input to the VSA between the different DUT transmitters. The resulting captured data are combined and analyzed as if the captured data was from the same packet. 
     Such testing techniques do allow testing of the MIMO functionality of the DUT, although perhaps not fully according to the specification established by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). However, such testing does operate the DUT in a challenging mode of operation by transmitting multiple streams of data through the different DUT transmitters. Both testing techniques can encounter limitations for testing MIMO systems, i.e., switched EVM testing can be problematic when testing DUT transmitters employing spatial diversity expansion. Similarly, composite EVM testing can be problematic for measuring single data stream operation transmitted via multiple transmitters, as well as transmitter isolation. Further, both testing techniques require known data in the transmitted data packets. 
     What is also lacking is an effective testing technique for testing the multiple receivers in a MIMO DUT using MIMO signal waveforms. This limitation exists due to the use of a single VSG which allows only one data stream to be generated, so the same data stream will be presented to all of the DUT receivers. One option is to test MIMO operation by verifying the maximum ratio combining (MRC) capability of a DUT using a single data stream by comparing the difference between the sensitivity when the signal is received by a single receiver and the sensitivity when the same signal is received by all DUT receivers. (As is well known in the art, MRC testing combines the signals from multiple spatial diversity branches, with each branch signal multiplied by a weight factor that is proportional to the signal magnitude i.e., stronger signals are further amplified while weaker signals are attenuated.) This tests the capability of the DUT to process parallel receive data streams and, from that, improve the sensitivity of the DUT (the theoretical improvement is 10*log 10N, where N is the number of DUT receivers). However, to perform a real MRC test, it is generally necessary to compare sensitivity points between the various receiver inputs to verify true MIMO performance. 
     Determining this sensitivity point is generally a long process, requiring more time than a simple packet error rate (PER) test, although some improved testing techniques have been developed such as U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/908,946, filed Jun. 1, 2005, and entitled “Method for Measuring Sensitivity of Data Packet Signal Receiver” (the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference), and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/161,692, filed Aug. 12, 2005, and entitled “Method for Measuring Multiple Parameters of a Signal Transmitted By a Signal Generator” (the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference). Further, it is possible that a MRC test using a single data stream may not test the true MIMO capability of the DUT, since it cannot exercise the true MIMO multi-stream processing of the DUT, and thus not verify performance at the highest data rates. Such a MRC test generally ensures only that the MRC signal processing is functional and that there is no coupling between the different DUT receiver signal paths that might prevent MIMO operation with multiple data streams. Accordingly, it is generally assumed that the signal processing inside the DUT will work (as it was supposed to have been tested by the chip manufacturer). 
     One alternative technique often used is including “a golden unit” i.e., a manufactured unit that has been fully, and often manually, tested as part of the test system to ensure operation at the maximum data rate. However, this is not ideal as a manufacturing solution, since accuracy, reliability and repeatability can vary, often significantly. 
     Until recently, these limitations on production testing have been more or less acceptable since the data rates needed in typical uses has been much lower than the data rates of which MIMO systems are capable. For example, when a typical user is accessing the Internet, data rates are typically limited to 10 megabits per second (mbps) or less from the Internet service provider (ISP). Accordingly, a MIMO system capable of more than 100 mbps will not be fully exercised. Hence, if the system is not fully operational, e.g., the system is not capable of receiving multiple streams of data at its maximum data rate, the user will not likely notice as the available data rates of 10 mbps can easily be served via a single data stream. 
     However, new devices and applications are using the higher bandwidths provided by MIMO. For example, video streaming can produce peak data rates greater than 100 mbps, as can some newer wireless data storage systems which require the highest possible data rate so as to perform a system data backup in the shortest time possible. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     In accordance with the presently claimed invention, a digital communications test system and method are provided for testing a plurality of devices under test (DUTs) in which multiple sets of a single vector signal analyzer (VSA) and single vector signal generator (VSG) can be used together to perform error vector magnitude (EVM) measurements for one or more DUTs in parallel, including one or more of composite, switched and multiple input multiple output (MIMO) EVM measurements. This allows N pairs of a VSA and VSG to test N DUTs with N×N MIMO in substantially the sane time as a single VSA and VSG pair can test a single DUT, thereby allowing a substantial increase in testing throughput as compared to that possible with only a single VSA and VSG set. 
     In accordance with one embodiment of the presently claimed invention, a digital communications test system for testing a plurality of devices under test (DUTs), including: 
     a plurality of DUT electrodes to couple to a plurality of DUTs, convey a plurality of DUT transmission signals from the plurality of DUTs, and convey a plurality of DUT reception signals to the plurality of DUTs; 
     a plurality of signal combining and dividing circuits to couple to a plurality of vector signal analyzers (VSAs) and a plurality of vector signal generators (VSGs), wherein each one of the plurality of signal combining and dividing circuits is adapted to combine at least first and second ones of the plurality of DUT transmission signals for a respective one of the plurality of VSAs, and divide a signal from a respective one of the plurality of VSGs to provide at least first and second ones of the plurality of DUT reception signals; and 
     a plurality of signal conveyance control circuits coupled between the plurality of DUT electrodes and the plurality of signal combining and dividing circuits, and responsive to one or more conveyance control signals by
         conveying one or more selected ones of the plurality of DUT transmission signals from one or more of the plurality of DUT electrodes to one or more of the plurality of signal combining and dividing circuits, and   conveying one or more of the plurality of DUT reception signals from one or more of the plurality of signal combining and dividing circuits to one or more of the plurality of DUT electrodes.       

     In accordance with another embodiment of the presently claimed invention, a digital communications test system for testing a plurality of devices under test (DUTs), including: 
     a plurality of DUT connector means for conveying a plurality of DUT transmission signals from a plurality of DUTs, and conveying a plurality of DUT reception signals to the plurality of DUTs; 
     a plurality of signal combiner and divider means each one of which is for combining at least first and second ones of the plurality of DUT transmission signals for a respective one of a plurality of vector signal analyzers (VSAs) and dividing a signal from a respective one of a plurality of vector signal generators (VSGs) to provide at least first and second ones of the plurality of DUT reception signals; and 
     a plurality of signal conveyance control means for responding to one or more conveyance control signals by
         conveying one or more selected ones of the plurality of DUT transmission signals from one or more of the plurality of DUT electrodes to one or more of the plurality of signal combining and dividing circuits, and   conveying one or more of the plurality of DUT reception signals from one or more of the plurality of signal combining and dividing circuits to one or more of the plurality of DUT electrodes.       

     In accordance with another embodiment of the presently claimed invention, a method for facilitating testing of a plurality of devices under test (DUTs) having multiple input multiple output (MIMO) radio frequency (RF) signal transmission and reception capabilities with a plurality of separate vector signal analyzers (VSAs) and a plurality of vector signal generators (VSGs) includes: 
     providing a plurality of controllable signal paths for controlling conveyance of a plurality of RF signals between a plurality of DUTs, a plurality of VSAs and a plurality of VSGs; and 
     receiving a plurality of control signals and in response thereto controlling respective ones of the plurality of controllable signal paths such that each one of a first portion of the plurality of controllable signal paths has a lower impedance to facilitate conveyance of one or more of the plurality of RF signals, and each one of a second portion of the plurality of controllable signal paths has a higher impedance to substantially prevent conveyance of another one or more of the plurality of RF signals, wherein, in accordance with the plurality of control signals, the plurality of controllable signal paths facilitate one or more of
         substantially simultaneous conveyance of first multiple ones of the plurality of RF signals from one of the plurality of DUTs to one of the plurality of VSAs,   alternating conveyance of second multiple ones of the plurality of RF signals from another one of the plurality of DUTs to another one of the plurality of VSAs,   substantially simultaneous conveyance of at least first and second ones of the plurality of RF signals from at least first and second ones of the plurality of VSGs, respectively, to each of at least first and second ones of the plurality of DUTs,   alternating conveyance of the at least first and second ones of the plurality of RF signals from the at least first and second ones of the plurality of VSGs, respectively, to the each of at least first and second ones of the plurality of DUTs, and   substantially simultaneous conveyance of at least first and second ones of the plurality of RF signals from one of the plurality of DUTs to at least first and second ones of the plurality of VSAs.       

     In accordance with another embodiment of the presently claimed invention, a method of testing a plurality of devices under test (DUTs) having multiple input multiple output (MIMO) radio frequency (RF) signal transmission and reception capabilities with a plurality of vector signal analyzers (VSAs) and a plurality of vector signal generators (VSGs) includes: 
     providing a plurality of controllable signal paths for controlling conveyance of a plurality of RF signals between a plurality of DUTs, a plurality of VSAs and a plurality of VSGs; 
     preparing the plurality of DUTs for RF signal testing; 
     receiving, via the plurality of controllable signal paths, one or more of
         a first plurality of RF signals substantially simultaneously from one of the plurality of DUTs with one of a plurality of VSAs, and   alternating ones of a second plurality of RF signals from another one of the plurality of DUTs with another one of the plurality of VSAs;       

     receiving, via the plurality of controllable signal paths, one or more of
         at least first and second ones of a plurality of RF signals at least partially simultaneously from at least first and second ones of a plurality of VSGs, respectively, with each of at least first and second ones of the plurality of DUTs, and   the at least first and second ones of a plurality of RF signals from the at least first and second ones of a plurality of VSGs, respectively, with alternating ones of the at least first and second ones of the plurality of DUTs.       

     In accordance with another embodiment of the presently claimed invention, a method of testing a plurality of devices under test (DUTs) having multiple input multiple output (MIMO) radio frequency (RF) signal transmission and reception capabilities with a plurality of vector signal analyzers (VSAs) and a plurality of vector signal generators (VSGs) includes: 
     providing a plurality of controllable signal paths for controlling conveyance of a plurality of RF signals between a plurality of DUTs, a plurality of VSAs and a plurality of VSGs; 
     preparing the plurality of DUTs for RF signal testing; 
     receiving with the plurality of VSAs, via alternating portions of the plurality of controllable signal paths, one or more of
         at least first and second ones of the plurality of RF signals substantially simultaneously from one of the plurality of DUTs, and   at least third and fourth ones of the plurality of RF signals substantially simultaneously from another one of the plurality of DUTs; and       

     receiving, via the plurality of controllable signal paths, one or more of
         at least partially simultaneously at least fifth and sixth ones of the plurality of RF signals at least partially simultaneously from the plurality of VSGs with the plurality of DUTs, and   the at least fifth and sixth ones of the plurality of RF signals from the plurality of VSGs with alternating ones of the plurality of DUTs.       

    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         FIG. 1  is a functional block diagram of conceptual operation of a 2×2 test system using a test interface in accordance with one embodiment of the presently claimed invention. 
         FIG. 2  is a functional block diagram of a test interface for a 3×3 test system in accordance with one embodiment of the presently claimed invention. 
         FIG. 3  is a functional block diagram of a 2×2 test interface for testing in accordance with another embodiment of the presently claimed invention. 
         FIG. 4  is a functional block diagram of the 2×2 interface of  FIG. 4  for testing in accordance with another embodiment of the presently claimed invention. 
         FIG. 5  is a flowchart for performing the tests using the interfaces of  FIGS. 3 and 4 . 
         FIG. 6  is a functional block diagram of a 2×2 test interface for MIMO testing in accordance with another embodiment of the presently claimed invention. 
         FIG. 7  is a flowchart for performing the test using the interface of  FIG. 6 . 
         FIG. 8  is a data flow diagram illustrating switched EVM and true transmit EVM data flows in accordance with alternative embodiments of the presently claimed invention. 
         FIG. 9  is a functional block diagram of an alternative embodiment of the 2×2 test interface of  FIGS. 3 and 4 . 
         FIG. 10  is a functional block diagram of another alternative embodiment of the 2×2 test interface of  FIGS. 3 and 4 . 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     The following detailed description is of example embodiments of the presently claimed invention with references to the accompanying drawings. Such description is intended to be illustrative and not limiting with respect to the scope of the present invention. Such embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to practice the subject invention, and it will be understood that other embodiments may be practiced with some variations without departing from the spirit or scope of the subject invention. 
     Throughout the present disclosure, absent a clear indication to the contrary from the context, it will be understood that individual circuit elements as described may be singular or plural in number. For example, the terms “circuit” and “circuitry” may include either a single component or a plurality of components, which are either active and/or passive and are connected or otherwise coupled together (e.g., as one or more integrated circuit chips) to provide the described function. Additionally, the term “signal” may refer to one or more currents, one or more voltages, or a data signal. Within the drawings, like or related elements will have like or related alpha, numeric or alphanumeric designators. Further, while the present invention has been discussed in the context of implementations using discrete electronic circuitry (preferably in the form of one or more integrated circuit chips), the functions of any part of such circuitry may alternatively be implemented using one or more appropriately programmed processors, depending upon the signal frequencies or data rates to be processed. 
     Referring to  FIG. 1 , a test system  10  for conceptually illustrating operation of a test in accordance with one embodiment of the presently claimed invention provides for testing of two DUTs  12   a ,  12   b , each of which is controlled by a respective computer  14   a ,  14   b  via one or more respective control signals  15   a ,  15   b . The DUTs  12   a ,  12   b  are coupled to a test system  16 , which includes two VSAs  20   aa ,  20   ba , two signal combining circuits  18   a ,  18   b  and two VSGs  20   ag ,  20   bg . The combining circuits  18   a ,  18   b  are preferably combining circuits capable of passing either input to the output or combining and passing both inputs to the output (e.g., for composite EVM testing), such as well known bi-directional signal power combiners (which would be shared by their associated VSA and VGA). Alternatively, the combining circuits  18   a ,  18   b  can be signal switches capable of passing a selected input to the output (e.g., for switched EVM testing). Such a system  16  enables testing of MIMO transmitters using a single VSA. The VSA/VSG combinations  20   aa / 20   ag ,  20   ba / 20   bg  are preferably mutually synchronized in time and frequency via a synchronizing interface  21  (e.g., shared triggered local oscillator sources). The computers  14   a ,  14   b  communicate with each other and the test system  16  via signal interfaces  22   a ,  22   b ,  22   c  and a router  22 . Alternatively, one single computer can be used to control both DUTs  12   a ,  12   b.    
     As discussed in more detail below, the first DUT  12   a  can provide both of its transmit signals  13   ata ,  13   atb  to the first signal combiner  18   a , as can the second DUT  12   b  provide its transmit signals  13   bta ,  13   btb  to the second signal combiner  18   b . This will enable parallel testing of the transmitters of both DUTs  12   a ,  12   b  using known methods for testing MIMO transmitters with a single VSA. Additionally, the first VSG  20   ag  can provide DUT reception signals  13   ara ,  13   bra  for one receiver of each DUT  12   a ,  12   b , as can the second VSG  20   bg  provide DUT reception signals  13   arb ,  13   brb  for the other DUT receivers. As noted above, the signal connections as shown are conceptual only. In accordance with the presently claimed invention, however, these signal connections can be implemented in a number of ways as will be described below in more detail. 
     Referring to  FIG. 2 , a test interface  100  for providing a 3×3 interface between 3 DUTs  112   a ,  112   b ,  112   c  and three parallel VSA/VSG assemblies  110   a ,  110   b ,  110   c  can be implemented using 3 signal combiners  102   a ,  102   b ,  102   c  and 18 single pole, double throw signal switches  104   aa ,  104   ab ,  104   ac ,  104   ba ,  104   bb ,  104   bc ,  104   ca ,  104   cb ,  104   cc ,  106   aa ,  106   ab ,  106   ac ,  106   ba ,  106   bb ,  106   bc ,  106   ca ,  106   cb ,  106   cc , interconnected substantially as shown. Additionally, nine signal attenuators  108   aa ,  108   ab ,  108   ac ,  108   ba ,  108   bb ,  108   bc ,  108   ca ,  108   cb ,  108   cc  can be used to scale or control e.g., balance, the magnitudes of the signals  113   aa ,  113   ab ,  113   ac ,  113   ba ,  113   bb ,  113   bc ,  113   ca ,  113   cb ,  113   cc , transmitted by or to be received by the DUTs  112   a ,  112   b ,  112   c . Additionally, these attenuators  108  can be programmable via one or more attenuation control signals  109   aa ,  109   ab ,  109   ac ,  109   ba ,  109   bb ,  109   bc ,  109   ca ,  109   cb ,  109   cc.    
     In accordance with well known principles, the signal combiners  102  are bi-directional and by splitting (in magnitude) a signal provided at its single signal port into substantially equal signals at its multiple signal ports, while combining (in magnitude) signals at its multiple signal ports into a composite signal at its single signal port. For example, the first signal combiner  102   a  splits an input signal  111   ab  into 3 substantially equal (in magnitude) output signals  103   aa ,  103   ab ,  103   ac . Conversely, the signal combiner  102   a  also combines multiple input signals  103   aa ,  103   ab ,  103   ac  into a composite output signal  111   ab.    
     Further, in accordance with well known principles, the signal switches  104 ,  106 , in accordance with their respective switch control signals  105   aa ,  105   ab ,  105   ac ,  105   ba ,  105   bb ,  105   bc ,  105   ca ,  105   cb ,  105   cc ,  107   aa ,  107   ab ,  107   ac ,  107   ba ,  107   bb ,  107   bc ,  107   ca ,  107   cb ,  107   cc , alternately provide closed signal connections between the respective signal ports of the signal combiners  102  and DUTs  112 . For example, the first set of switches  104   aa ,  106   aa  can provide one of two closed signal paths  116   a ,  116   b . Similarly, the second set of signal switches  104   ab ,  106   ab  in conjunction with another set of signal switches  104   bb ,  106   bb  can alternately provide four closed signal paths  116   c ,  116   d ,  116   i ,  116   j  between various ports of the first and second signal combiners  102   a ,  102   b  and first and second DUTs  112   a ,  112   b.    
     The signal switches  104 ,  106  are coupled between the individual ports of the signal combiners  102  and DUTs  112  so as to provide multiple combinations of open and closed signal paths  116  such that each individual radio frequency (RF) signal port of each DUT  112  can communicate directly with a single VSA  110   aa ,  110   bc ,  110   ca . For example, each individual signal  113   aa ,  113   ab ,  113   ac , in accordance with appropriate settings of their associated signal switches,  104   aa ,  106   aa ,  104   ab ,  106   ab ,  104   ac ,  106   ac , communicate via closed signal paths  116   a ,  116   c ,  116   e  and combine in the signal combiner  102   a  to produce a composite signal  111   ab , which is directed, via a signal router (e.g. switch)  110   ab , as the input signal  111   aa  to the same VSA  110   aa . This enables composite EVM testing. Alternatively, by switching two of the associated switches to their other positions, thereby opening the signal paths such that only one transmitter is connected to the power combiner, switched EVM testing can be performed by closing one signal path at a time. Similarly, composite and switched EVM testing can be performed for the second DUT  112   b  with its VSA  110   ba  through appropriate settings of its associated signal switches  104   ba ,  106   ba ,  104   bb ,  106   bb ,  104   bc ,  106   bc , as well as for the third DUT  112   c  with its VSA  110   ca  through appropriate settings of its associated signal switches  104   ca ,  106   ca ,  104   cb ,  106   cb ,  104   cc ,  106   cc.    
     Additionally, appropriate settings of the signal switches  104 ,  106  (as well as the test system switches  110   a ,  110   bb ,  110   cb ) ensure that each VSG  110   ag ,  110   bg ,  110   cg  can communicate a signal to at least one of the RF signal ports of each DUT  112   a ,  112   b ,  112   c . For example, the first VSG  110   ag  can communicate its signal  111   ag  to the first DUT  112   a  via associated signal switches  104   aa ,  106   aa , to the second DUT  112   b  via associated signal switches  104   ab ,  106   bb , and the third DUT  112   c  via associated signal switches  104   ac ,  106   cb . Similar connections can be provided between the remaining VSGs  110   bg ,  110   cg  and the DUTs  112   a ,  112   b ,  112   c  as well. 
     As will be readily appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art, the pairing of the signal switches  104   aa ,  106   aa ,  104   ba ,  106   ba ,  104   ca ,  106   ca  having both throws mutually connected are implemented as single pole, double throw switches for consistency with the remaining switches,  104 ,  106 , but can be replaced by single pole, single throw switches, or alternatively as programmable signal attenuators for which “opening” and “closing” the signal path equates to programming higher and lower signal attenuations, respectively. Additionally, it would be further readily recognized that additional embodiments can be implemented beyond the 3×3 implementation illustrated here using additional combinations of signal switches and signal combiners with a corresponding number of signal combining ports, as well as in 2×2 implementations (as discussed in more detail below). 
     Referring to  FIG. 3 , in accordance with another embodiment of the presently claimed invention, a 2×2 test interface can be configured to perform MIMO transmission testing using known single VSA measurement techniques. As shown, the two individual VSAs  110   aa ,  110   ba  operate independently of each other while testing the DUTs  112   a ,  112   b . The first VSA  110   aa  is performing composite EVM testing with both transmission signals  113   aa / 115   aa ,  113   ab / 115   ab  of the first DUT  112   a  being provided via closed signal paths  116   a ,  116   c  and combined by the signal combiner  102   a . The second VSA  110   ba  is performing switched EVM testing with the first transmission signal  113   ba / 115   ba  from the second DUT  112   b  being provided via a closed signal path  116   g  to the signal combiner  102   b , following which the associated signal switches  106   ba ,  106   bb  are programmed to switch their connections, thereby opening the first signal path  116   g  and closing the second signal path  116   i  for testing the second transmission signal  113   bb / 115   bb . (Such signal designators, e.g.,  113   aa / 115   aa , indicate that the subject signal can be either the DUT signal  113   aa  or the attenuated signal  115   aa  depending upon whether the attenuators  108  are used.) 
     Referring to  FIG. 4 , in accordance with another embodiment of the presently claimed invention, the switches,  104 ,  106 ,  110   ab ,  110   bb  ( FIG. 2 ) can be programmed for testing the receive operation of the DUTs  112   a ,  112   b . As will be readily appreciated for receiver testing, one VSG signal can be provided to multiple DUTs, since limited interaction between the VSG and DUT is generally needed. For example, one or more data packets are sent to a DUT, in response to which the DUT will transmit back an acknowledgment signal (ACK). Hence, a simple detection of an acknowledgement signal before the power combiners  102  can be performed to record individual counts of acknowledgment data packets. Some examples of this type of testing can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/279,778, filed Apr. 14, 2006, and entitled “Method for Testing Embedded Wireless Transceiver With Minimal Interaction Between Wireless Transceiver and Host Processor During Testing” (the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference), and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/839,814, filed Aug. 16, 2007, and entitled “System for Testing an Embedded Wireless Transceiver” (the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference). The computer (not shown) controlling such DUT can also inquire as to how many data packets have been received and, knowing how many data packets were to have been sent, compute the PER. 
     For example, the signal  111   ag / 111   ab  from the first VSG  110   ag  is provided to one receiver of each DUT  112   a ,  112   b  via its signal combiner  102   a , signal paths  116   a ,  116   d  and associated signal switches  104   aa ,  106   aa ,  104   ab ,  106   bb . Similarly, the signal  111   bg / 111   bb  provided by the second VSG  110   bg  can be provided to the other receiver ports of the DUTs  112   a ,  112   b  via its signal combiner  102   b , signal paths  116   h ,  116   j  and associated signal switches  104   ba ,  106   ba ,  104   bb ,  106   ab . This allows each VSG  110   ag ,  110   bg  to provide one of multiple data packet streams in parallel, which can be synchronized in time such that the two data packet streams are sent simultaneously as a true MIMO data packet. By transmitting different data packet streams from the VSGs  110   ag ,  110   bg , testing of true MIMO receiver functionality can be achieved. Further, by appropriately programming the VSGs  110   ag ,  110   bg  to produce baseband signals representing different phases, VSG signals can be generated to emulate a true MIMO signal channel such that the MIMO signal being produced emulates the signal that a normal DUT will see, i.e., a combination of the two data packet streams arriving at different phases at the two DUT receiver ports. 
     Alternatively, with such extensive interconnections available via the combiners  102 , signal paths  116  and signal switches  104 ,  106 , the signals  111   ag / 111   ab ,  111   bg / 111   bb  from the VSGs  110   ag ,  110   ab  can be conveyed to the DUTs  112   a ,  112   b  in an alternating manner. For example, during a first time interval, the signal  111   ag / 111   ab  from the first VSG  110   ag  can be provided to one receiver of the first DUT  112   a  via its signal combiner  102   a , signal path  116   a  and associated signal switches  104   aa ,  106   aa , while the signal  111   bg / 111   bb  from the second VSG  110   bg  can be provided to the other receiver port of the first DUT  112   a  via its signal combiner  102   b , signal path  116   j  and associated signal switches  104   bb ,  106   ab . Following that, during a second time interval, the signal  111   ag / 111   ab  from the first VSG  110   ag  can be provided to one receiver of the second DUT  112   b  via its signal combiner  102   a , signal path  116   d  and associated signal switches  104   ab ,  106   bb , while the signal  111   bg / 111   bb  from the second VSG  110   bg  can be provided to the other receiver port of the second DUT  112   b  via its signal combiner  102   b , signal path  116   h  and associated signal switches  104   ba ,  106   ba . It will be readily appreciated, however, that this will require a longer time for testing both DUTs  112   a ,  112   b  than would be possible with substantially simultaneous conveyance of both signals  111   ag / 111   ab ,  111   bg / 111   bb  from the VSGs  110   ag ,  110   ab  to both DUTs  112   a ,  112   b.    
     Referring to  FIG. 5 , in accordance with another embodiment of the presently claimed invention, the test flows discussed above for  FIGS. 3 and 4  can be presented as shown. In the first steps  202 , the DUTs are prepared. In the next step  204 , each system  110  performs the transmission test independently. These transmission tests are continued until it is determined in a decision step  206  that all tests have been completed. Following this, the system enters a wait state  208  in which all systems that have completed their respective transmission tests wait until all other systems are ready to perform a receiver test. In the next step  210 , the receiver test is performed. These reception tests are continued until it is determined in a decision step  212  that all tests have been completed. In most instances, both DUTs will be tested while operating at the same frequency and using substantially similar data packet streams. Accordingly, the test times for both DUTs should be substantially similar, thereby making this a substantially parallel test operation. 
     Some MIMO systems include asymmetrical configurations, e.g. two transmitters and three receivers, in which case, the system as described above will support the lower number of data packet streams, with one VSG needed for each receiver. For example, if the system is asymmetrical such that it can transmit two data packet streams and receive three data packet streams, then three VSGs will be needed. Alternatively, if three receivers are operating in parallel but they can only process a maximum of two data packet streams, then only two VSGs may be needed, in which case if two data packet streams are transmitted using three VSGs it is possible that a faulty receiver could go undetected. In other words, if the system can only process two data packet streams via the three receivers, each receiver should be isolated and separately tested to ensure it is fully functional, since if the two data packet streams are supplied to the two functional receivers, the DUT can pass the test and yet not be fully functional due to the one non-functional receiver. The receivers can be tested two at a time, with any unused receiver having its input port properly terminated, although a more complex switching matrix may be needed. As another alternative, the individual receivers can be tested for RSSI (receive signal strength indication) or one receiver can receive one data packet stream while the other receivers each receive a second data packet stream. In any event, in accordance with the presently claimed invention, so long as the test interface includes signal combiners and associated signal switches equal in number to the higher of the number of transmitters and receivers, virtually any combination of testing can be performed for both symmetrical and asymmetrical MIMO systems. 
     Referring to  FIG. 6 , in accordance with another embodiment of the presently claimed invention, true MIMO transmission EVM testing can be performed by using all VSAs in parallel to capture the transmitted data packets from one DUT. For example, in a 2×2 system, the first VSA  110   aa  receives a signal  111   aa / 111   ab  containing the data packet stream  113   aa / 115   aa  from the first DUT  112   a  via its signal combiner  102   a , signal path  116   a  and associated signal switches  104   aa ,  106   aa . Simultaneously, the second VSA  110   va  receives a signal  111   ba / 111   bb  containing the same data packet stream  113   ab / 115   ab  from the first DUT  112   a  via its signal combiner  102   b , signal path  116   j  and associated signal switches  104   bb ,  106   ab . Following completion of testing of the first DUT  112   a , the second DUT  112   b  can be tested by altering the signal switch connections such that the first VSA  110   aa  receives a data packet stream  113   bb / 115   bb  via its signal combiner  102   a , signal path  116   d  and associated signal switches  104   ab ,  106   bb , and the second VSA  110   ba  receives the same data packet stream  113   ba / 115   ba  via its signal combiner  102   b , signal path  116   g  and associated signal switches  114   ba ,  106   ba . This allows sequential testing of true MIMO EVM. 
     Referring to  FIG. 7 , this test flow can be represented as shown. For transmission testing, the DUTs operate in parallel but share access to the test system. Accordingly, in the first step  302 , both DUTs are prepared for testing. In the next step  304 , both DUTs request access to the test system, following which one obtains access and initiates testing while the other remains in a wait state until the test system becomes available again. In the next step  306 , the DUT with access performs its transmission test, following which the test system is released  308 . In the next step  310 , if more transmission tests are required, the DUT enters a wait state  304  pending availability of the test system. After both DUTs have completed their respective transmission tests, the system enters a wait state  312  pending readiness for receive testing. When ready, in the next step  314 , receive testing is performed, with further receive testing performed if necessary  316 . Alternatively, with sufficiently fast signal switches  104 ,  106 , it is possible to wait for both systems to become ready, following which data capture begins by first capturing the data of one DUT  112   a , resetting the appropriate switches, and then capturing the data of the other DUT  112   b  (with the recognition of valid data capture effectively serving as a handshake indicating readiness for switching to receive another DUT output). 
     Switched EVM testing is typically performed by capturing multiple consecutive data packets using the same test system  110 , but selecting a different DUT transmitter for each data packet. Following the capturing of the data packet, the data packets are combined and analyzed. For example, in a system supporting two transmitters, two consecutive data packets are captured (one from each DUT transmitter). Similarly, in a system supporting three transmitters, three data packets will be captured. Comparing this to measuring true MIMO EVM capturing only one data packet will yield similar results. As discussed above, using switched EVM testing allows parallel testing of multiple DUTs in a system with parallel sets of VSAs and VSGs. For a system testing three 3×3 DUTs at the same time, each of the three VSAs will need to capture three data packets (one for each DUT transmitter). Since the system is capable of fast signal switching, a true transmit MIMO data capture can be performed for each DUT. If the DUTs are operated in parallel, i.e., transmitting the same data packet at the same frequency, but not necessarily synchronous in time, capturing MIMO data will take virtually the same time as performing switched EVM, and the same amount of data will be transferred. 
     Referring to  FIG. 8 , in accordance with another embodiment of the presently claimed invention, a comparison of the switched EVM and true MIMO test techniques can be better understood. The upper portion of this figure illustrates the switched EVM testing approach, while the lower portion illustrates the true MIMO testing approach. In both examples, each DUT  112   a ,  112   b ,  112   c  transmits its respective data packet  113   a ,  113   b ,  113   c  during three data packet intervals P 1 , P 2 , P 3 . The first VSA  110   aa  captures the first transmitter output  113   aa , second transmitter output  113   ab  and third transmitter output  113   ac  during data packet intervals P 1 , P 2  and P 3 , respectively. This is achieved by switching the signal switches  104 ,  106 , as discussed above, between the data packets  113   a ,  113   b ,  113   c . Meanwhile, in parallel, the second VSA  110   ba  captures the first transmitter output  113   ba , second transmitter output  113   bb  and third transmitter output  113   bc  of the second DUT  112   b  during data packet intervals P 1 , P 2  and P 3 , respectively. Similarly, also in parallel, the third VSA  110   ca  captures the first  113   ca , second  113   cb  and third  113   cc  transmitter outputs of the third DUT  112   c  during data packet intervals P 1 , P 2  and P 3 , respectively. Following capturing of all these data packets, the captured data packets are transferred to the analysis software for processing. 
     During MIMO testing, the DUTs  112   a ,  112   b ,  112   c  also transmit their respective data packets  113   a ,  113   b ,  113   c  during the data packet intervals P 1 , P 2 , P 3 . With appropriate control of the signal switches  104 ,  106 , as discussed above, the first VSA  110   aa  captures the first transmitter outputs  113   aa ,  113   ba ,  113   ca  of the three DUTs  112   a ,  112   b ,  112   c  during the three data packet intervals P 1 , P 2 , P 3 . Similarly, the second  110   ba  and third  110   ca  VSAs capture the second  113   ab ,  113   bb ,  113   cb  and third  113   ac ,  113   bc ,  113   cc  transmitter outputs, respectively, of the DUTs  112   a ,  112   b ,  112   c  during the data packet intervals P 1 , P 2 , P 3 . In other words, during the first data packet interval P 1 , the first VSA  110   aa , second VSA  110   ba  and third VSA  110   ca  capture the first transmitter output  113   aa , second transmitter output  113   bb  and third transmitter output  113   ac , respectively, of the first DUT  112   a . Similarly, during the second data packet interval P 2 , the first VSA  110   aa , second VSA  110   ba  and third VSA  110   ca  capture the first  113   ba , second  113   bb  and third  113   bc  transmitter outputs, respectively, of the second DUT  112   b . Further, similarly, during the third data packet interval P 3 , the first VSA  110   aa , second VSA  110   ba  and third VSA  110   ca  capture the first  113   ca , second  113   cb  and third  113   cc  transmitter outputs, respectively, of the third DUT  112   c.    
     The captured data packets in the three VSAs  110   aa ,  110   ba ,  110   ca  can then be combined such that the analysis software controlling the first DUT  112   a  receives the three captured data packets associated with the first DUT  112   a . Similarly, the analysis software controlling the second  112   b  and third  112   c  DUTs will receive the data packets associated with the second  112   b  and third  112   c  DUTs, respectively. 
     Referring to  FIG. 9 , in accordance with another embodiment of the presently claimed invention, if only true MIMO transmit EVM testing is desired, the configuration of signal switches can be simplified. For example, both sets  104 ,  106  of single pole, double throw switches can be replaced by a single set  120  of single pole, single throw switches, since it is only necessary to alternately open and close the single paths. For receiver testing, all switches  120  are closed, thereby enabling true parallel receiver testing since each DUT  12   a ,  12   b  receives a signal from each VSG  110   ag ,  110   bg . For transmitter testing, the upper switches  120   aa ,  120   ab  are closed and the lower switches  120   ba ,  120   bb  are opened for testing the first DUT  12   a , while the upper switches  120   aa ,  120   ab  are opened and the lower switches  120   ba ,  120   bb  are closed for testing the second DUT  12   b . It will be readily appreciated that this configuration can be expanded in terms of the number of switches  120  and signal ports on the signal combiners  102   a  to support more than this 2×2 system. It will be further readily appreciated that instead of switches, the signal paths can be effectively opened and closed by using signal attenuators having programmable higher and lower signal attenuations, respectively. 
     Referring to  FIG. 10 , in accordance with another embodiment of the presently claimed invention for a 2×2 system, control over the signal paths closest to the signal combiners  102  can be implemented using programmable signal attenuators  122  and signal detectors  124 . With this implementation, some degree of automatic control can be achieved since the signal detectors  124  (e.g., power coupling circuits) can detect the presence of transmit signals from the DUTs  12   a ,  12   b . For example, upon detection of the presence of an active transmit signal, each signal detector  124   aa ,  124   ab ,  124   ba ,  124   bb  can initiate, e.g. assert, a detection signal  125   aa ,  125   ab ,  125   ba ,  125   bb  indicating such presence of a transmit signal. A controller  126  monitoring these detection signals  125   aa ,  125   ab ,  125   ba ,  125   bb , which can also be under the control of a computer via one or more control signals  129 , provides appropriate attenuator control signals  127  for the signal attenuators  122 . For example, if the first signal detector  124   aa  indicates the presence of a transmit signal, while the remaining signal detectors  124   ab ,  124   ba ,  124   bb  fail to detect any transmit signals, and it is desired that subsequent data packets received via the same path as the detected signal be conveyed to the first VSA  110   aa  for testing, the controller can program the first signal attenuator  122   aa  via its control signal  127   aa  for low, or minimum, signal attenuation, while programming the remaining signal attenuators  122   ab ,  122   ba ,  122   bb  via their control signals  127   ab ,  127   ba ,  127   bb  for higher, or maximum, signal attenuation. 
     In accordance with another embodiment of the presently claimed invention, the test interface discussed above can be used to support testing of Wi-Fi MIMO devices operating simultaneously in two frequency bands, e.g., simultaneous operation at 2.4 gigahertz (GHz) in a 2×2 MIMO configuration or higher, and at 5 GHz in a 2×2 or higher MIMO configuration. Such devices can be tested sequentially, but such testing does not ensure that the device can operate in both frequency bands simultaneously (e.g., due to effects of crosstalk or inter-channel coupling). Using a test interface in accordance with the presently claimed invention allows such devices to be tested in a pseudo-parallel manner. 
     Referring back to  FIG. 3 , the two DUTs  112   a ,  112   b  can be considered as a single DUT with the first DUT portion  112   a  being the 2.4 GHz channel and the second DUT portion  112   b  being the 5 GHz channel. In the event that the VSAs  110   aa ,  110   ba  cannot operate simultaneously at two frequencies more than 2 GHz apart, true transmit EVM testing can be performed in the 2.4 GHz frequency band, followed by similar testing in the 5 GHz frequency band. In any event, switched and composite EVM testing can be performed in parallel. Similarly, single data stream testing for the receiver can be performed. Additionally, sensitivity, i.e., not PER, can be tested using a pseudo-link test (where the DUT returns an acknowledgment signal when a good packet is received), thereby making it possible to test sensitivity for simultaneous transmit and receive operations. Of course, if the VSAs  110   a ,  110   ba  and VSGs  110   ag ,  110   bg  are capable of operating simultaneously at frequencies more than 2 GHz apart, such limitations can be avoided. 
     Various other modifications and alternations in the structure and method of operation of this invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and the spirit of the invention. Although the invention has been described in connection with specific preferred embodiments, it should be understood that the invention as claimed should not be unduly limited to such specific embodiments. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the present invention and that structures and methods within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.

Technology Classification (CPC): 7