Patent Abstract:
The invention addresses the problem of providing an edged tool such as a surgical clade or a razor blade that is durable and sharp, and a manufacturing method therefor. The problem is solved by an edged tool manufacturing method provided with a process of treating a metal base material, which has a machined surface obtained by machining, using a plasma generated in an atmosphere filled with a mixed gas having a main gas and a reaction gas as the main components.

Full Description:
TECHNICAL  FIELD 
       [0001]    The present invention relates to an edged tool such as surgical blade, shaving razor and so forth, a method of manufacturing the same, and a plasma device for manufacturing the same. 
       BACKGROUND  ART 
       [0002]    Edged tools represented by surgical blade (scalpel, etc.) and shaving razor preferably have high sharpness of their edges. 
         [0003]    The following proposals have been made on these sorts of edged tools. 
         [0004]    For example, Patent Literature 1 describes a blade member which includes edges of a group of blades subjected to ion beam treatment using a plasma ion gun in a vacuum chamber, in which argon is used as a medium, wherein the pressure of the argon gas is 0.1 to 1 Pa, a bias voltage applied to the blade group is 0.1 to 1000V, and the processing time is 5 to 300 minutes. According to the description, an edged tool with enhanced sharpness and clean cuttability was successfully provided by improving a processing technology based on ion beam processing. 
         [0005]    In other example, Patent Literature 2 describes a method of surface modification of blade edges of sharp edge tools, wherein the method includes subjecting sharp metal edged tools to vacuum evaporation, while applying in vacuo negative voltage to the blade edges of sharp metal edged tools to cause ion implantation of anion on the surface of the blade edge. According to the description, such method successfully improves mechanical properties of the surficial layer of the blade edges. 
         [0006]    In still other example, Patent Literature 3 proposes a method of shaping or reshaping a blade edge by removing a blade material from both sides of the blade edge, by sputtering using argon ion. It is also described that the shape of blade edge as a result of ion bombardment is given by W=ad″ (where, W represents the thickness of the blade edge measured at distance d away from the end of blade, and a and n are constants). 
         [0007]    Again in still other example, Patent Literature 4 describes a technique of increasing hardness of an edged tool by forming on the surface thereof a hard layer composed of an intermetallic compound by plasma ion nitriding, or by forming on the surface a diamond-like carbon film, to thereby suppress wearing, and to prevent dulling. 
       CITATION LIST 
     Patent  Literature 
       [0008]    Patent Literature 1: JP-A-2009-153877 
         [0009]    Patent Literature 2: JP-B-H04-2666 
         [0010]    Patent Literature 3: Examined Japanese Patent No. 2779453 
         [0011]    Patent Literature 4: JP-A-2004-298562 
       SUMMARY  OF THE  INVENTION 
     Technical  Problem 
       [0012]    The edged tool is, however, desired to have still better cuttability, while keeping the durability. 
         [0013]    It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an edged tool having still better cuttability, despite an equivalent level of durability as compared with the conventional edged tools, a method of manufacturing the same, and a plasma device for manufacturing the same. 
       Solution to  Problem 
       [0014]    Aiming at solving the problems described above, the inventors accomplished the present invention after our thorough investigations. 
         [0015]    The present invention includes items (1) to (9) below. 
         [0016]    (1) A method of manufacturing an edged tool, the method including treating a metal base, having a machined surface obtained by machining, with a plasma generated in an atmosphere filled with a mixed gas mainly composed of a major gas and a reactive gas. 
         [0017]    (2) The method of manufacturing an edged tool described in (1), wherein the ratio (AGP/MGP) of partial pressure of reactive gas (AGP) and partial pressure of major gas (MGP) in the mixed gas is 0.001 to 0.1. 
         [0018]    (3) The method of manufacturing an edged tool described in (1) or (2), wherein the partial pressure of major gas (MGP) in the mixed gas is 0.01 to 10 Pa, and the partial pressure of reactive gas (AGP) is 0.001 Pa or higher. 
         [0019]    (4) The method of manufacturing an edged tool of any one described in (1) to (3), wherein the major gas is nitrogen, and the reactive gas is oxygen. 
         [0020]    (5) The method of manufacturing an edged tool of any one described in (1) to (4), wherein the metal base is a blade base formed by machining a plate-like blade forming member at the belly-side end from both sides in the thickness direction, so as to give two machined surfaces which come apart in the direction from the edge towards the spine, while forming in between a predetermined sharpening angle. 
         [0021]    (6) An edged tool obtained by the method of manufacturing described in any one described in (1) to (5). 
         [0022]    (7) The edged tool described in (6), wherein the machined surface has formed therein a concave surface, with a predetermined radius of curvature, which caves inwardly within range H originated from the edge end towards the spine. 
         [0023]    (8) The edged tool described in (7), wherein the radius of curvature of the concave surface is 30 to 2500 nm, and the range H is 5 to 300 nm. 
         [0024]    (9) A plasma device suitable for implementing the manufacturing method described in any one described in (1) to (5), the plasma device including a vacuum chamber, a gas feeding unit which introduces the mixed gas into the vacuum chamber, a holder which holds the metal base placed in the vacuum chamber and a filament disposed face-to-face therewith, and a power source for filament which feeds current to the filament. 
       ADVANTAGEOUS EFFECTS OF  INVENTION 
       [0025]    According to the present invention, durable edged tool having a good level of cuttability, a method of manufacturing such edged tool, and a plasma device for manufacturing such edged tool may be provided. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF  DRAWINGS 
         [0026]      FIG. 1  is a schematic drawing exemplifying a shape of a metal base (blade base) usable for the present invention. 
           [0027]      FIG. 2  is another schematic drawing exemplifying a shape of a metal base (blade base) usable for the present invention. 
           [0028]      FIG. 3  is a drawing explaining a method of manufacturing a metal base usable for the present invention, in an illustrative manner. 
           [0029]      FIG. 4  is a schematic cross sectional view illustrating a plasma device suitable for implementing the method of manufacturing according to the present invention. 
           [0030]      FIG. 5  is a schematic drawing for explaining an edged tool of the present invention. 
           [0031]      FIG. 6  is an image (enlarged photograph) of an edge obtained in Example 1, observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). 
           [0032]      FIG. 7  is an image (enlarged photograph) of an edge obtained in Comparative Example 1, observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). 
           [0033]      FIG. 8  is an image (enlarged photograph) of an edge obtained in Comparative Example 2, observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). 
       
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS 
       [0034]    The present invention will be explained. 
         [0035]    The present invention relates to a method of manufacturing an edged tool, which includes treating a metal base, having a machined surface obtained by machining, with a plasma generated in an atmosphere filled with a mixed gas mainly composed of a major gas and a reactive gas. 
         [0036]    Such method of manufacturing is also referred to as “the manufacturing method of this invention” hereinafter. 
         [0037]    The edged tool obtainable by the manufacturing method of this invention is also referred to as “the edged tool of this invention” hereinafter. 
       &lt;Metal Base&gt; 
       [0038]    First, the metal base used in the manufacturing method of this invention will be explained. 
         [0039]    In the manufacturing method of this invention, the metal base is not specifically limited so long as it has a machined surface obtained by machining, and so long as it is usable to give edged tools such as surgical blade (scalpel, etc.), shaving razor and so forth. As illustrated in  FIG. 1 , the metal base is preferably a blade base  1  formed by machining a plate-like blade forming member at the belly-side end from both sides in the thickness direction, so as to give two machined surfaces  7  which come apart in the direction from the edge  3  towards the spine (back end  5 ), while forming in between a predetermined sharpening angle α. A more better embodiment and a method of manufacturing will be described later. 
         [0040]    Size and material of the metal base are not specifically limited so long as the metal base is usable for general surgical blade, shaving razor or the like. A plate-like material composed of stainless steel, for example, is usable. 
         [0041]    The machined surface of the metal base is preferably obtained by machining. The machining is exemplified by grinding, drawing and polishing (blasting, stropping, etc.). It is preferable to combine two or more sorts of machining. More specifically, grinding is preferably followed by polishing. 
         [0042]    A preferable embodiment of the metal base in the manufacturing method of this invention will be explained referring to  FIG. 2 . The metal base in the manufacturing method of this invention is preferably a blade base illustrated in  FIG. 2 . 
         [0043]      FIG. 2(   a ) is a schematic cross sectional view of the blade base, and  FIG. 2(   b ) is an enlarged view of the edge and a periphery thereof illustrated in  FIG. 2(   a ). 
         [0044]    A blade base  11  illustrated in  FIG. 2  is formed by machining a plate-like blade forming member at the belly-side end (edge  13  side) from both sides in the thickness direction, so as to give two machined surfaces  17  which come apart in the direction from the edge  13  towards the spine (back end  15  side), while forming in between a predetermined sharpening angle α, further so as to give two apical surfaces  21  which extend respectively from two machined surfaces  17  beyond a first boundary  19  towards the spine (back end  15  side) while forming in between a predetermined apical angle β, and still further so as to give two side faces  25  which extend respectively from two apical surfaces  21  beyond a second boundary  23  towards the spine (back end  15  side). 
         [0045]    With the metal base given as the blade base  11  of this embodiment, the edged tool of this invention will preferably have an improved sharpness. 
         [0046]    While a method of manufacturing the blade base  11  of this preferable embodiments is not specifically limited, the blade base  11  is preferably manufactured according to a method explained below referring to  FIG. 3 . 
         [0047]    First, as illustrated in  FIG. 3(   a ), a plate-like blade forming member  30 , formed with a predetermined shape and with thickness T, is ground from both side faces  32  which align nearly parallel to each other in the thickness direction X. As a result of grinding, as illustrated in  FIG. 3(   b ), both side faces  32  of the blade forming member  30  are inclined, so that the thickness of the blade forming member  30  becomes thinner from the back end  34  side towards the belly-side end  36 . 
         [0048]    Next, both side faces  32  of the blade forming member  30  illustrated in  FIG. 3(   b ) are ground on the belly-side end  36  thereof. As a result of grinding, as illustrated in  FIG. 3(   c ), two apical ground surfaces  38  are formed so as to obliquely extend from the belly-side end  36  towards the spine, while forming in between a predetermined apical angle β, up to a predetermined range from the edge end  40 . On both side faces  32  of the blade forming member  30 , ground side faces  42  which lie between the apical ground surfaces  33  and the back end  34  are left as they are illustrated in  FIG. 3(   b ). 
         [0049]    Next, assuming now the boundaries between the apical ground surfaces  38  and the ground side faces  42  as boundaries  44 , the apical ground surfaces  38 , the boundaries  44 , and the ground side faces  42  which extend from the boundaries  44  are polished. As a result of polishing, as illustrated in  FIG. 3(   d ), two apical polished surfaces  46  are formed so as to obliquely extend from the edge end  40  towards the spine, while forming in between a predetermined apical angle β, and side polished surfaces  50  are formed so as to extend from the apical polished surfaces  46  beyond the boundaries  48  towards the spine. 
         [0050]    Next, the apical polished surfaces  46  are machined to give an edge at the edge end  40 . More specifically, as illustrated in  FIG. 3(   e ) and  FIG. 3(   f ), two machined surfaces  52  are formed so as to obliquely extend towards the spine, while forming in between a predetermined sharpening angle α, within a predetermined region which originates from the edge end  54 . Also apical surfaces  58  are formed so as to obliquely extend from these two machined surfaces  52  beyond the boundaries  56  towards the spine, while forming in between a predetermined apical angle β. 
       &lt;Plasma Treatment&gt; 
       [0051]    Next, plasma treatment in the manufacturing method of this invention will be explained. 
         [0052]    In the manufacturing method of this invention, at least the machined surfaces of the metal base are subjected to plasma treatment. 
         [0053]    The plasma treatment refers to a process of treating the metal base with a plasma generated in an atmosphere filled with a mixed gas mainly composed of a major gas and a reactive gas. 
         [0054]    In the conventional method, the metal base having machined surfaces obtained by machining as described above has been treated in a plasma generated in an atmosphere filled with the major gas. The inventors, however, found that the edged tool obtained after such plasma treatment was not so sharp. 
         [0055]    After our thorough investigations, the inventors found that the edge end portion of the machined surfaces of the metal base was formed into a preferable shape, remarkably improved in sharpness, and improved in durability, when treated in a plasma generated in an atmosphere filled with a mixed gas of a major gas and a reactive gas (preferably a specific ratio of reactive gas), rather than with the major gas only. The present invention was achieved based on the finding. 
         [0056]    The mixed gas used here contains the major gas and the reactive gas as major components, where the major components account for 70% or more in terms of volume ratio. In other words, the total content of the major gas and the reactive gas in the mixed gas is 70% by volume or more. The total content is preferably 80% by volume or above, more preferably 90% by volume or above, more preferably 95% by volume or above, more preferably 98% by volume or more, and furthermore preferably 99% by volume or more. 
         [0057]    The major gas means a rare gas or nitrogen, wherein nitrogen is preferable. 
         [0058]    The reactive gas means a gas other than the major gas, wherein oxygen is preferable. 
         [0059]    By using nitrogen as the major gas, and by using oxygen as the reactive gas, the machined surface is preferably shaped more suitably, further remarkably improved in cuttability, and improved in durability. It is therefore further preferable to use the mixed gas of nitrogen and air. 
         [0060]    The mixed gas containing nitrogen is preferable since it can nitride the machined surface of the metal base to enhance the strength and durability. 
         [0061]    Partial pressure of the major gas (MGP) in the mixed gas is preferably 0.01 to 10 Pa, more preferably 0.1 to 5 Pa, more preferably 0.5 to 2.0 Pa, more preferably 0.9 to 1.4 Pa, and furthermore preferably 1.14 Pa or around. 
         [0062]    Partial pressure of the reactive gas (AGP) in the mixed gas is preferably 0.001 Pa or above, more preferably 0.001 to 0.08 Pa, more preferably 0.005 to 0.07 Pa, more preferably 0.01 to 0.05 Pa, and furthermore preferably 0.012 Pa or around. 
         [0063]    Partial pressure of the major gas (MGP) in the mixed gas is preferably 0.01 to 10 Pa (preferably 0.5 to 2.0 Pa, and more preferably 0.9 to 1.4 Pa), and, partial pressure of the reactive gas (AGP) is preferably 0.001 Pa or above (preferably 0.001 to 0.08 Pa, more preferably 0.005 to 0.07 Pa, and furthermore preferably 0.01 to 0.05 Pa). This is because the machined surface will be more suitably shaped, remarkably improved in cuttability, and additionally improved in durability. 
         [0064]    Pressure of the mixed gas used for generating the plasma is preferably 0.1 to 11 Pa, more preferably 0.3 to 2.5 Pa, more preferably 0.5 to 1.5 Pa, and furthermore preferably 1.2 Pa or around. 
         [0065]    Ratio (AGP/MGP) of the partial pressure of reactive gas (AGP) and the partial pressure of major gas (MGP) in the mixed gas is preferably 0.001 to 0.1, preferably 0.002 to 0.05, more preferably 0.006 to 0.06, and furthermore preferably 0.053 or around. This is because the machined surface will be more suitably shaped, and remarkably improved in sharpness, and additionally improved in durability. 
         [0066]    As described above, it is preferable to use the mixed gas composed of nitrogen and air, wherein the partial pressure of nitrogen in the mixed gas is preferably 0.1 to 10 Pa, more preferably 0.5 to 2.0 Pa, more preferably 0.9 to 1.3 Pa, and. furthermore preferably 1.14 Pa or around. On the other hand, the partial pressure of air in the mixed gas is preferably 0.001 to 1 Pa, more preferably 0.01 to 0.3 Pa, more preferably 0.04 to 0.1 Pa, and furthermore preferably 0.06 Pa or around. 
         [0067]    The metal base is preferably subjected to plasma treatment using a device illustrated in  FIG. 4 . 
         [0068]      FIG. 4  illustrates a plasma device based on arc discharge using a hot filament. A plasma device  60  illustrated in  FIG. 4  has a vacuum chamber  62 , a gas feeding unit  66  which introduces a mixed gas  64  into the vacuum chamber  62 , a holder  70  which holds a metal base  68  placed in the vacuum chamber  62  and a filament  72  disposed face-to-face therewith, and a power source  74  for filament which feeds current to the filament  72 . The plasma device  60  also has a hollow cathode-type electrode  78  which is disposed so as to cover the filament  72  and includes an arc discharge source  76 , a coil  80  and an insulator  82  disposed on the outer surface of the hollow cathode-type electrode  78 , and a bias voltage source  84  which applies bias voltage to the metal base  68 . 
         [0069]    In the thus configured plasma device  60 , the mixed gas  64  composed of the major gas and the reactive gas is introduced using the gas feeding unit  66  into the vacuum chamber  62  to fill the chamber, and electric current is then fed to the filament  72  so as to trigger glow discharge, to thereby generate a plasma of the mixed gas (discharging gas). 
         [0070]    The bias voltage applied herein is preferably 50 to 1000 V, more preferably 300 to 900 V, more preferably 450 to 750 V, and furthermore preferably 600 V or around. 
         [0071]    Plasma treatment time is preferably 1 to 10 hours, more preferably 1.5 to 4 hours, and furthermore preferably 2 to 3 hours. 
         [0072]    Ion current density is preferably 0.1 to 50 mA/cm 2 , more preferably 0.5 to 10 mA/cm 2 , and furthermore preferably 2 to 3 mA/cm 2 . 
         [0073]    The partial pressure of major gas (MGP) and the partial pressure of reactive gas (AGP) in the manufacturing method of this invention are determined, by measuring flow rates of the major gas and the reactive gas, when the mixed gas  64  is fed by the gas feeding unit  66  into the vacuum chamber  62 , using flow meters (orifices, etc.), and by calculation based on the obtained measurement values, capacity of the vacuum chamber  62 , and volume of gases discharged from the vacuum chamber  62 . 
         [0074]    For an exemplary case where nitrogen and air are introduced into the vacuum chamber  62 , first the individual flow rates are measured using the flow meters similarly as described above, then flow rates of gases corresponded to the major gas and the reactive gas contained in nitrogen and air are calculated based on the individual values of gas concentration, and then the partial pressure values are calculated similarly as described above, additionally using the capacity of the vacuum chamber  62  and the volume of gases discharged from the vacuum chamber  62 . 
         [0075]    The pressure of the mixed gas is determined as a sum of the partial pressure values of the major gas and the reactive gas measured and calculated as described above. 
         [0076]    The edged tool of this invention is successfully obtained by the above described manufacturing method of this invention. The edged tool of this invention is exemplified as illustrated  FIG. 5 . 
         [0077]      FIG. 5(   a ) is a schematic side elevation of a scalpel used for surgical operation, representing a preferable embodiment of the edged tool of this invention, and  FIG. 5(   b ) is a cross sectional view (schematic drawing) taken along line A-A in  FIG. 5(   a ). 
         [0078]    An edge end part  92  of a scalpel  90  illustrated in  FIG. 5(   a ) has, as illustrated in  FIG. 5(   b ), two concave surfaces  94  with a predetermined radius of curvature, which cave inwardly in a cross section. The concave surfaces  94  are formed within range H which originates from the edge end  96  towards the spine. 
         [0079]    The radius of curvature (R in  FIG. 5 ) of each concave surface is preferably 30 to 2500 nm, and more preferably 100 to 1000 nm. 
         [0080]    The range H is preferably 5 to 300 nm, and more preferably 10 to 100 nm. 
         [0081]    The thus configured scalpel  90  is extremely sharpened in the edge end  96  by the plasma treatment, and therefore has good cuttability . 
       EXAMPLE 
     Example 1 
       [0082]    A blade base, which was machined into a shape of surgical blade and composed of a material equivalent to SUS420J2 (Cc 0.6% by mass), was set on the holder mounted on the plasma generating apparatus configured as illustrated in  FIG. 4 , and the machined surfaces of the edge end were subjected to plasma treatment. The plasma treatment was conducted using a PINK-type plasma device based on arc discharge using a hot filament manufactured by Nagata Seiki Co., Ltd., and using a mixed gas of nitrogen and air (partial pressure of nitrogen=1.14 Pa, partial pressure of air=0.06 Pa, to be introduced into the vacuum chamber), under conditions of an ion current of 2.5 mA/cm 2 , and a bias voltage of 600 V, for 2 hours. 
         [0083]    The edge end after the plasma treatment was observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). An obtained enlarged, photograph (50000× magnification) is shown in  FIG. 6 . On  FIG. 6 , the radius of curvature (R) of the concave surfaces formed at the edge end part and the range (H) originated from the edge end were measured. 
         [0084]    Note that  FIG. 6(   a ) is an enlarged photograph, and  FIG. 6(   b ) is a transcribed image of a cross section of the edge end, also comparatively showing a dotted line representing Comparative Example 2 which will be described later. 
         [0085]    Conditions for treatment are summarized in Table 1, and results of measurement of shape of edge end are summarized in Table 2. 
         [0086]    The thus obtained edged tools were also evaluated by cuttability test. 
         [0087]    In the cuttability test, pig tongue embedded in paraffin was cut into 2-μm slices using a ball-bearing microtome (from Yamato Kohki Industrial Co., Ltd.), wherein the cuttability was evaluated by the number of slices correctly cut. 
         [0088]    Test results of evaluation of cuttability are summarized in Table 3. 
       Example 2 
       [0089]    While the partial pressure of nitrogen and the partial pressure of air, to be introduced into the vacuum chamber in Example 1, were set to 1.14 Pa and 0.06 Pa respectively, now the partial pressure of nitrogen and the partial pressure of air to be introduced into the vacuum chamber in Example 2 were set to 1.14 Pa and 0.005 Pa respectively. All other conditions for the plasma treatment were remained unchanged from those in Example 1. 
         [0090]    Conditions for the treatment are summarized in Table 1. 
       Example  3 
       [0091]    While the partial pressure of nitrogen and the partial pressure of air, to be introduced into the vacuum chamber in Example 1, were set to 1.14 Pa and 0.06 Pa respectively, now the partial pressure of nitrogen and the partial pressure of air to be introduced into the vacuum chamber in Example 3 were set to 1.14 Pa and 0.40 Pa respectively. All other conditions for the plasma treatment were remained unchanged from those in Example 1. 
         [0092]    Conditions for the treatment are summarized in Table 1. 
       Comparative Example  1 
       [0093]    While the partial pressure of nitrogen and the partial pressure of air in the mixed gas in Example 1 were set to 1.14 Pa and 0.06 Pa respectively, now the mixed gas in Comparative Example 1 was changed to nitrogen (100% by volume). All other conditions for the plasma treatment were remained unchanged from those in. Example 1. 
         [0094]    Similarly to Example 1, the edge end after the plasma treatment was observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). An obtained enlarged photograph and a transcribed image are shown in  FIGS. 7(   a ) and ( b ), respectively. 
         [0095]    Conditions for the treatment are summarized in Table 1, and results of measurement of shape of edge end are summarized in Table 2. 
         [0096]    Also the test for evaluating cuttability was conducted similarly to Example 1. Test results of evaluation of cuttability are summarized in Table 3. 
       Comparative Example 2 
       [0097]    A surgical blade composed of a material equivalent to SUS420J2 (C: 0.6% by mass) was obtained by machining similarly to Example 1. 
         [0098]    Again similarly to Example 1, the edge end was observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). An obtained enlarged photograph and an transcribed image are shown in  FIGS. 8(   a ) and ( b ), respectively. 
         [0099]    Results of measurement of shape of edge end are summarized in Table 2. 
         [0100]    Also the test for evaluating cuttability was conducted similarly to Example 1. Test results of evaluation of cuttability are summarized in Table 3. 
         [0000]    
       
         
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                   
                 TABLE 1 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 Comparative 
               
               
                   
                 Example 1 
                 Example 2 
                 Example 3 
                 Example 1 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 Case description 
                 Plasma of 
                 Plasma of 
                 Plasma of 
                 Plasma of 
               
               
                   
                 nitrogen 
                 nitrogen 
                 nitrogen 
                 nitrogen 
               
               
                   
                 added 
                 added 
                 added 
                 only 
               
               
                   
                 with air 
                 with air 
                 with air 
               
               
                 Material 
                 SUS420 
                 SUS420 
                 SUS420 
                 SUS420 
               
               
                 Pressure of introduced 
                 0.06 
                 0.005 
                 0.40 
                 Not detected 
               
               
                 air [Pa] 
               
               
                 Pressure of introduced 
                 1.14 
                 1.14 
                 1.14 
                 1.14 
               
               
                 nitrogen [Pa] 
               
               
                 Pressure of mixed gas 
                 1.20 
                 1.15 
                 1.54 
                 1.14 
               
               
                 [Pa] 
               
               
                 Pressure of oxygen 
                 0.013 
                 0.001 
                 0.084 
                 — 
               
               
                 in mixed gas 
               
               
                 (calculated value, Pa) 
               
               
                 Pressure of nitrogen 
                 1.19 
                 1.14 
                 1.46 
                 1.14 
               
               
                 in mixed gas 
               
               
                 (calculated value, Pa) 
               
               
                 Ion current density 
                 2.5 
                 2.5 
                 2.5 
                 2.5 
               
               
                 [mA/cm 3 ] 
               
               
                 Bias voltage value [V] 
                 600 
                 600 
                 600 
                 600 
               
               
                 Treatment time [Hr] 
                 2 
                 2 
                 2 
                 2 
               
               
                 AGP/MGP (calculated 
                 0.011 
                 0.001 
                 0.058 
                 0 
               
               
                 value) 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                   
                 TABLE 2 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                 Comparative 
                 Comparative 
               
               
                   
                 Example 1 
                 Example 1 
                 Example 2 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 Radius of curvature (R, nm) 
                 500 nm 
                 Infinite 
                 Infinite 
               
               
                 Range H (nm) 
                  80 nm 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0000]    
       
         
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                   
                 TABLE 3 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                 Comparative 
                 Comparative 
               
               
                   
                 Example 1 
                 Example 1 
                 Example 2 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 Number of correct slices 
                 43 
                 23 
                 26 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0101]    It is understood from comparison among  FIG. 6  to FIG.  8 , that the edge is most sharpened in the case illustrated in  FIG. 6 . XRD analysis revealed that almost same levels of state of generation of intermetallic compounds (Fe 4 N, Cr 4 N) were observed in the cases illustrated in  FIG. 6  and  FIG. 7 . Measurement using a micro Vickers hardness meter revealed almost same levels of hardness in the cases illustrated in  FIG. 6  and  FIG. 7 . 
         [0102]    The edge ends obtained in Example 2 and Example 3 were found to be sharper than the edge end obtained in Comparative Example 1. It is therefore considered, from comparison with the edge end of Comparative Example 1, that the edge ends obtained in Examples 2 and 3 have good cuttability. 
         [0103]    Note, however, that the edge end obtained in Example 1 was found to have cuttability further superior to that of the edge ends obtained in Examples 2 and 3. It is therefore concluded that the edge end obtained in Example 1 is more preferable than the edge ends obtained in Examples 2 and 3. 
         [0104]    It was also confirmed, from the test results of evaluation of cuttability summarized in Table 3, that the edged tool of Example 1 showed the best cuttability. The edged tool of Comparative Example 1 was found to be further duller than the edged tool of Comparative Example 2, since the edge end was formed to have an obtuse angle. 
       REFERENCE  SIGNS  LIST 
       [0105]      1 ,  11  blade base 
         [0106]      3 ,  13  edge end 
         [0107]      5 ,  15 ,  34  back end 
         [0108]      17 ,  52  machined surface 
         [0109]      19  first boundary 
         [0110]      21 ,  56  apical surface 
         [0111]      23  second boundary 
         [0112]      25 ,  32  side face 
         [0113]      30  blade-forming member 
         [0114]      36  belly-side end 
         [0115]      38 ,  46  apical ground surface 
         [0116]      40  edge end 
         [0117]      42 ,  50  ground side face 
         [0118]      44 ,  48 ,  54  boundary 
         [0119]    α predetermined sharpening angle 
         [0120]    β predetermined apical angle 
         [0121]    T thickness 
         [0122]    X thickness direction 
         [0123]      60  plasma device 
         [0124]      62  vacuum chamber 
         [0125]      64  mixed gas 
         [0126]      66  gas feeding unit 
         [0127]      68  metal base 
         [0128]      70  holder 
         [0129]      72  filament 
         [0130]      74  power source for filament 
         [0131]      76  arc discharge source 
         [0132]      78  hollow cathode-type electrode 
         [0133]      80  coil 
         [0134]      82  insulator 
         [0135]      84  bias voltage source 
         [0136]      90  scalpel 
         [0137]      92  edge end part 
         [0138]      94  concave surface 
         [0139]      96  edge end 
         [0140]    R radius of curvature 
         [0141]    H range

Technology Classification (CPC): 5