Patent Abstract:
Analysis of execution traces to identify execution problems is described. Analysis of the execution trace allows the user to detect application execution patterns. Each pattern represents a sequence of operations performed by the application. Some patterns correspond to normal execution of the application. Some patterns correspond to typical operations such as file opening, file saving, site browsing, mail sending. Diagnostic classes include patterns associated with certain malfunctions. In one embodiment, the system includes a learning mode wherein the system accumulates patterns belonging to different classes and stores them in a pattern database. In one embodiment, the system also includes a recognition mode where the system matches the trace against the pattern database and assigns trace regions to specific classes such as normal, abnormal, classes of specific problems or user activities, etc.

Full Description:
REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION 
     The present application claims priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/458,322, filed Mar. 27, 2003, titled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TROUBLESHOOTING RUNTIME SOFTWARE PROBLEMS USING APPLICATION LEARNING,” the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. 
    
    
     REFERENCE TO COLOR DRAWINGS 
     The present application contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent application with color drawings will provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     The present invention relates to software tools for assisting software developers and users in the task of monitoring and analyzing the execution of computer programs, such as during the troubleshooting process. 
     2. Description of the Related Art 
     The software industry faces a challenge in fighting malfunctions (colloquially known as “bugs”) that occur in the released versions of commercial software. Such malfunctions cause serious problems both for customers and vendors. It is often difficult to identify the particular situation, or situations, that leads to the malfunction and this adds to the difficulty of finding the root-cause of the malfunction in the application code or coding environment. The problem is especially difficult if it appears only at a remote customer site and is not reproducible in the development and testing environments. Remote software troubleshooting based on run-time execution tracing of applications in production environments is often used to identify and diagnose such malfunctions. This approach provides insight into the running application and allows gathering of execution traces that record function calls, variables, source lines and other important information. However, analysis of program execution traces and understanding of the root-cause of a program error is a tedious and time-consuming task. The execution trace log can contain thousands of function calls and other entries corresponding to events that happened just before the malfunction. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention solves these and other problems associated with software troubleshooting (debugging) by analyzing execution traces of software programs. The analysis provides reduction and classification of the data that is presented to the user (the user typically being a software analyst tasked with locating the cause of the malfunction). The user, working with the tracing tool, has the option of not analyzing the raw execution trace log containing a relatively large list of low-level events. Rather, the user can view a relatively smaller processed log that categorizes the low-level events into relatively higher-level events attributed to known classes or regions of normal functioning or different anomalies. In one embodiment, the analysis program can send alerts on known classes of problems or anomalies 
     Analysis of the execution trace allows the user to detect the application execution patterns. Each pattern represents a sequence of operations performed by the application. Patterns are associated with the situation classes. Thus it is possible to identify patterns that represent a relatively broad class of normal execution of the application. Other classes include patterns for typical operations such as file opening, file saving, site browsing, mail sending, etc. For diagnostic purposes, the classes include patterns associated with certain malfunctions. In one embodiment, the system includes a learning mode and a recognition mode. In the learning mode the system accumulates patterns belonging to different classes and stores them in a pattern database. In the recognition mode, the system matches the trace against the pattern database and assigns trace regions to specific classes of execution, such as, for example, normal execution classes, abnormal execution classes, execution classes related to specific problems, execution related to user activities, etc. 
     In one embodiment, the learning mode includes an automatic learning sub-mode. In one embodiment, the learning mode includes a user-guided learning sub-mode In the learning mode the system accumulates patterns belonging to different execution classes and stores them in a database. Automatic learning is often used for accumulating patterns belonging to a generic class corresponding to normal execution. User-guided learning involves activity of a user who selects certain log regions and attributes them to a particular execution class such as normal execution, execution classes related to specific problems, execution related to user activities, etc. 
     In the recognition mode, the system matches the trace against the pattern database and assigns trace regions to specific execution classes. Of special interest is the abnormal execution class. A trace region (e.g., a group of events in the execution trace log) is attributed to the abnormal execution class if it contains a relatively high density of unknown patterns. This class usually marks situations related to software malfunctions or insufficient training data in the pattern database. If the user who works with the system decides that the abnormality region appeared because it is related to a new execution path that was not encountered during learning, the analyst can assign it to the normal class using the user-guided learning mode. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee. 
       A software system which embodies the various features of the invention will now be described with reference to the following drawings. 
         FIG. 1  is a block diagram of the automatic learning process. 
         FIG. 2  is a block diagram of the user-assisted learning process. 
         FIG. 3  is a block diagram of the situation-recognition process. 
         FIG. 4  is a flowchart of the learning algorithm. 
         FIG. 5  shows a collapsed situation view. 
         FIG. 6  shows an expanded situation view. 
         FIG. 7  shows an “Options” dialog box that allows the user to specify classification parameters. 
         FIG. 8  shows a “Pattern Base” dialog that allows the user to review and control the pattern database state. 
         FIG. 9  shows a “Stop Learning” dialog that allows the user to stop automatic learning. 
         FIG. 10  shows a “Do Learning” dialog that is used for user-guided learning. 
         FIG. 11  shows an “Undo Learning” dialog that is used to remove selected patterns from the module pattern file. 
         FIG. 12  shows a “Properties” window that provides a graph showing pattern database activity corresponding to adding new patterns to the pattern database. 
         FIG. 13  shows how decisions have been made to assign a situation class. 
     
    
    
     In the drawings, like reference numbers are used to indicate like or functionally similar elements. In addition, the first digit or digits of each reference number generally indicate the figure number in which the referenced item first appears. 
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
       FIG. 1  is a block diagram of an automatic pattern learning process  100 , where an execution tracer  101  produces a runtime trace log  102  of an application. Execution tracing is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,202,199, the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference. The trace log  102  is initially post-processed and separated into logical streams  108  by a stream extractor  104 . A pattern generator  110  generates patterns from the streams and checks to see if a found pattern is present in a pattern database  106 . New patterns are added to the database. 
       FIG. 2  is a block diagram of a user-assisted pattern learning process  200 , where an execution tracer  201  produces a trace log  202 . The trace log  202  is initially post-processed and separated into logical streams  206  by a stream extractor  204 . A pattern comparator  208  classifies streams according to patterns stored in a pattern database  210 . Classified streams  212  are visualized on the computer screen using a classified trace view  214 . The trace view  214  includes a situation tree view. The situation tree view differs from an ordinary trace tree view in the prior art by including additional intermediate nodes that embrace child nodes of operations attributed to particular classes and labels for those classes. A user  218  views classified regions and can manually select a region of the trace log  202  and assign the selected region to a particular execution class. The pattern generator  216  extracts new patterns from the region and saves them in the pattern database  210 . 
       FIG. 3  is a block diagram of a situation recognition mode  300 , where a pattern database  306  created during the learning stage is used for the classification of trace operations. In  FIG. 3 , an execution tracer  301  produces a trace log  302 . The trace log  302  is initially post-processed and separated into logical streams  308  by a stream extractor  304 . A pattern comparator  310  detects patterns in the streams corresponding to patterns stored in the pattern base  306 . Detected patterns are used for the creation of a classified trace view  314  that is presented to the user  316 . 
     Each pattern represents a sequence of operations performed by the traced application under certain conditions. A pattern can be represented as:
         O 1 , O 2 , . . . , O i , O i+1  . . . , O N  
 
where O i  represents the i-th operation. N is the length of the pattern sequence, and can be selected empirically. In some embodiments 1&lt;N&lt;10. In another embodiment, N 10.
       

     A stream of operations is separated into overlapping sub-sequences of the constant length N. For example, consider learning a stream of eight operations in a trace log
         a b c d e f g h       

     For the case of pattern length N equal to 6, the following patterns will be extracted:
         a b c d e f   b c d e f g   c d e f g h       

     Meaningful sequences of operations in complex modern applications are selected for analysis. Many modern applications are complex, being multithreaded, and in many cases executed in distributed multi-user environment. Simple time ordering of system calls is too low-level a representation that is influenced by many random or irrelevant factors. The sequences in the patterns stored in the pattern database preferably reflect the internal logic of the program. To identify the patterns, the sequential trace log is pre-processed and separated into logical streams reflecting certain semantic or logical sets of operations. For example, operations can be separated into streams according to: operations belonging to a particular thread; operations performed by particular user of the application; operations belonging to particular transactions, operations belonging to particular user action; operations belonging to a particular function body; etc. Note that with regard to operations belonging to particular transactions, there can be numerous definitions of transactions depending on the semantic of the application class. 
     In one embodiment, recorded operations have a tree-like structure of nested function calls. In one embodiment, two options are provided for linearization of nested calls into a linear sequence of events:
         (1) tree-walk around trees of call operations to reduce the call operations into one thread-dependent linear stream (a traditional approach); and/or   (2) tracking each non-zero level as a separate stream. As a special case, it is possible to generate patterns only for operations of level zero. This allows the user to ignore non-important low-level events.       

     The user can generate shortened patterns that contain M&lt;N operations. Shortened patterns are generated in the user-guided learning mode if a region selected for learning contains less than N operations. Each new combination of N or fewer successive operations is saved in the pattern database in association with the identifier of the situation class: 0 for normality; 1 or above for user-defined special situations. A pattern can be saved with multiple class identifiers. 
     Each operation O i  is characterized by a number of characteristics. The characteristics can include, for example, one or more of: an invocation point, a function entry point, a return code, an operation type, function arguments, etc. The invocation point can include, for example, an invoking module name, invocation offset, etc. The function entry point can include, for example, the calling module name, the entry offset, etc. The return code can include, for example, a normal return code, an abnormal return code etc. In one embodiment, additional knowledge about the function is used to determine if the return code value corresponds to a normal situation, or an error condition. The operation type can include, for example, a function call, creating a thread, exiting a thread, a pseudo-operation (e.g., stream opening, closing, padding, etc.), etc. 
     In one embodiment, deterministic and/or statistical procedures are used for the classification process. A deterministic procedure is typically used in cases where specific patterns are typical for a particular situation. In most cases, the presence of a single situation pattern or absence of any learned patterns is not enough for reliable classification. For example, there can be cases of patterns belonging to several classes, or limitations of statistics during learning when not all patterns of normal execution situations were encountered. Moreover a region can contain patterns of several classes. 
     In order to increase reliability of the classification, a statistical procedure is used in some embodiments. In one embodiment, a statistical procedure is based on a selection of regions of consecutive stream operations, and calculation of densities of pattern matches for all database-known execution situation classes. The density value for a situation class in a region of stream-adjacent operations is defined as a ratio of pattern matches for the class to the whole number of operations in the region. 
     In one embodiment, the classification process is described as follows. Select a region R n  of n adjacent stream elements. A density D n   i , 0 D n   i  1 is assumed, for a specific execution class i. One can choose regions of different lengths 1, 2, etc. covering the same target stream element: R 1 , R 2 , . . . . For efficiency reasons, the upper limit is set to the locality frame size F (30 by default in some embodiments). In other embodiments, locality frame size F can be set smaller or greater than 30. For a stream element, there are F density values for the chosen situation class i: D 1   i , D 2   i , . . . , D F   i . Let R i  to be a region that delivers the maximal density: D i =max l {D l   i }. If there are multiple candidates the lengthiest region is chosen. 
     The database-known situation classes are enumerated to receive the best density regions R 0 , R 1 , etc. for classes 0, 1, . . . that cover the target stream element. The target element is attributed to an execution class n that delivers the maximal density: D=max i {D i }. If there are multiple candidates to deliver the maximal density D, then the class with minimal ID is chosen. Thus, the normal execution class takes precedence over classes of special situations. If, however D&lt;T where T is a density threshold (0.8 by default in some embodiments), the target element is assigned to an unknown situation (abnormality), with conditional density D −1 =1−D. 
     To reduce overhead, the algorithm implementation can deduce a situation class of the maximal density for each following stream operation with minimal looking back over operation sequences of different length. 
     For the current stream element, the algorithm processes F (locality frame) regions that end with the current element. As a result, the situation class C and the region length L delivering the maximal density D are deduced and the class C is assigned to the current element. The class C can also be optionally assigned to up to L−1 preceding elements replacing the class previously ascribed to them. Such replacement spreads back until an element is found whose class was assigned with a density value greater than D. 
     Backward-processing orientation of the algorithm can be used for support of on-line analysis of an operation stream while it is appended with new operations. 
     During the learning mode, an attempt to add a new pattern is made as a result of processing operations. The situation class (the execution class) is a parameter of the learning process. In the automatic learning mode the default situation class is a broad class of “Normal Execution”. In the user-guided learning mode situation classes are defined by the users. 
       FIG. 4  is a flowchart of the learning algorithm, which starts in a block  401  that sets the situation class to be learned. In the simplest case, the default situation class is a broad class described as normal execution. Other cases include different abnormal execution classes, such as database or network connectivity problems, file locking problems, etc. A stream history array is filled by an operation characteristics block  402  until it reaches the maximum pattern length (tested in a block  404 ). If the array contains a new pattern (tested in a block  406 ), this pattern is appended to the database in a block  408 . The process blocks  404 - 408  are repeated until the learning threshold reached (tested in a block  410 ). If the learning is not finished, the algorithm checks if the event sequence is finished (tested in a block  412 ). If the event sequence is not finished, then the sequence of blocks  402 - 410  is repeated again; otherwise, the event sequence is checked to determine if the array is filled to the maximum pattern length (tested in a block  414 ). If the maximum length is reached, then the learning process exits in an exit block  420 ; otherwise, a check is performed so determine if the array contains a new pattern (tested in a block  416 ). In a case if this pattern is new, then it is added to the database in a block  418 ; otherwise, the algorithm exits at the exit block  420 . 
     A set of Graphical User Interface objects (described in connection with  FIGS. 5-13 ) are used to guide the user through the workflow of pattern learning and situation classification.  FIG. 5  shows a typical situation view window for an example of tracing two parallel processes of applications Far.exe  502  and WinWord.exe  504 . The first application is under learning and the second one is under abnormality detection.  FIG. 5  includes an operation column, a comment column, and a process column. 
     In one embodiment, background color-coding is used to provide certain information to the user. Operations related to an application under learning are background-colored in light blue  506   a ,  506   b . Operations related to an application in a recognition mode have a more complicated coloring scheme depending on the situation class: The situation corresponding to normality is shown in a white background (as shown, for example, in lines  508   a  and  508   b ). An unknown situation (abnormality) is shown in a pink background (as shown, for example, in lines  510   a ,  510   b , and  510   c ). Situations corresponding to a specific class are shown in a light-yellow background (as shown, for example, in lines  512   a  and  512   b ). The colors used to illustrate examples are not limited thereto. Other color schemes or designation schemes can be used. 
     In contrast to an ordinary trace event view (as shown, for example, in FIG. 3A of U.S. Pat. No. 6,202,199), nodes of a given level in the trace event tree of  FIG. 5  are assembled under an additional labeling item if those nodes are assigned to the same known situation class, or if the nodes relate to an application under learning. Labeling items are supplied with class-dependent icons and labeled with a range of identifiers of descendant events. Special situation items are additionally labeled with a legend of the class. For example, in  FIG. 5 , headers are shown in line  506   a  for operations  2 - 17  (learning) and in line  506   b  for operations  272 - 282  (learning).  FIG. 5  shows normal execution operations are shown, for example in lines  508   a  for operations  23 - 33   508   a  and in line  508   b  for operations  152 - 162 . Line  512   a , corresponding to operations  36 - 142  and line  512   b , corresponding to operations  165 - 271  show a special WinWord situation class ‘SAVE operation’. 
     In one embodiment, unknown situation operations (pink background) are not supplied with labeling and are presented in expanded form in order to attract the user&#39;s attention. 
     Operations that are considered failed are text-colored in red in the comment column (no failed operations are shown in  FIG. 5 ). By default, text in the operation column is black. It changes color to red for parent operations that have pink-background child operations. Such a such situation is illustrated in  FIG. 5  by lines  506   a  and  512   b  that are class labeling items. 
     In one embodiment, as a default, the parent operation and labeling items are initially collapsed. An exception is made for parent items that head, directly or indirectly, pink-background operations, where the parent items are initially expanded in order to attract the users attention to unknown situations. View items in  FIG. 5  are shown after being collapsed.  FIG. 6  shows the same view as  FIG. 5  when initially expanded. 
     The right side of the window in  FIG. 6  (and  FIG. 5 ) includes a bar  602  that shows event sequence zones of each situation class (or learning zone) in position and length proportional to the length of the whole sequence. Zone colors are similar to those used for view item backgrounds. The proportionality bar allows easy navigation through the trace by clicking regions corresponding to the particular class zones. It also visually reflects the degree of the log compression. 
     The user controls the program by using context and conventional GUI controls such as menus, toolbar buttons, dialog boxes, and the like. Control actions can be conveniently described in terms of functional groups. A Group 1 provides controls for setting options and showing the pattern base state. Settings for Group 1 include opening the ‘Options’ dialog window. Show state options for Group 1 include opening the ‘Pattern base’ dialog window. A Group 2 provides controls for filtering by thread and clearing the thread filter. When filtering the thread, the situation view filters by a thread that the selected operations belong to. When the thread filter is cleared, the situation view returns to the unfiltered state. A Group 3 controls includes tree-handling selection of zero-level nodes, the node one level up, the nodes one level down, etc. A “Select zero-level nodes” control selects all zero-level nodes and makes the first zero-level node visible. A “Select node one level up” control moves selection and visibility to the parent node. A “Select nodes one level down” control expands the nodes under the selection and moves selection to its child nodes. 
     A Group 4 controls includes learning control operations such as: stop learning; learn selection; forget selection; undo last learning; properties; etc. Stop learning opens the open the ‘Stop learning’ dialog window. Learning selection open the ‘Do learning’ dialog window. Forget selection opens the ‘Undo learning’ dialog window. Undo last learning returns the pattern base to a state before the last user-guided learning. A Group 5 includes showing the properties window. 
       FIG. 7  shows an ‘Options’ dialog that allows the user to set the main parameters of the situation classifier. A locality frame size control  702  allows the user to define how many operations are analyzed in a stream to define a region of maximal density of pattern matches. An abnormality ratio control  704  allows the user to specify the density threshold. If the best density for a pattern-base-known situation class is less that the threshold, then operations are assigned to the unknown situation. Other options are not directly related to abnormality detection and are shown dimmed  706 . When the options locality frame size and/or abnormality ratio are set by the user, the abnormality classifier re-parses the operation sequence and refreshes the situation view. 
       FIG. 8  shows a ‘Pattern base’ dialog  800  that allows the user to inspect and to control the pattern base state. The pattern base dialog  800  enumerates the patterns existing in the pattern base. For every module  801  the following information is shown: a column  802  shows how many operations were passed during initial automatic learning; a column  804  shows how many unique patterns were extracted; and a column  806  shows the learning saturation ratio of unique patterns to all operations passed. 
     In one embodiment, a coloring scheme is applied to show the current status of the pattern file related to specific module. Grey is used to indicate that the file is disabled and the situation classifier neither appends it with new patterns nor assigns any situation classes to operations. Red is used to indicate that the file is inconsistent and can be fixed by deleting only; it is also disabled. Blue is used to indicate that the file is under learning. The state ‘under learning’ is an initial state for new pattern files. The situation classifier supplies all new patterns with the normality class identifier and accumulates them in the pattern file. Upon stopping learning, either automatically, by applying the threshold for the learning saturation ratio, or manually, the pattern file goes to the state ‘under situation detection’. Black is used to indicate that the file is under situation detection. User-guided learning can be made in this state only. 
     The window menu items shown in  FIG. 8  include: Disable  812  (Make the file disabled), Enable  814  (make the file enabled), Stop learning  816  (open the ‘Stop learning’ dialog window) and Delete  818 . The Delete item  818  include sub-items Disable from now (Delete the file) and Learn afresh (Empty the file and make it open for learning). 
       FIG. 9  shows the ‘Stop learning’ dialog  900  used to stop automatic learning. The stop learning dialog  900  is used to finish the pattern learning process for modules that relate to operations in the situation view and are under learning. The dialog  900  lists the modules and allows the user to select a specific module. If no module selection is made, the stop learning dialog  900  can nevertheless be applied for setting the threshold of the learning saturation ratio (the ‘Stop criterion’ field  901 ). Unless the threshold value is zero, a pattern file under learning that achieves the learning saturation ratio less than the threshold value is automatically closed for automatic learning normal patterns and begins to assist the situation classifier to detect known/unknown situations. If a module is selected, the window shows how many operations have been passed for the module and how many unique patterns have been extracted for the module. Pressing an ‘OK’ button  908  manually stops the automatic learning mode for the selected module. 
       FIG. 10  shows a ‘Do learning’ dialog  1000  used for user-guided learning. The dialog  1000  enumerates enabled module pattern files that relate to selected operations in the situation view and are currently under situation detection. Once a module pattern file  1002  is selected, its list of currently defined special situation classes is shown in the ‘Abnormalities’ box  1004 . 
     As a result of user-guided learning, the situation classifier re-scans a subset of selected operations that relate to the selected pattern file and appends new patterns to the file. Users are free to assign these patterns either to normality or to a special situation class (e.g., using a ‘Learn as a specific abnormality’ checkbox  1006 ). If a new special situation class is created, the user may be given the option to input the legend text for it. 
     According to a ‘Learn top level sequence only’ checkbox  1008  checkbox, scanning can be made either for all operations or for the top-level operations only. Scanning the top-level stream exclusively may be desirable because the lower level operations frequently do not really identify the situation. After successful user-guided learning the situation view is refreshed. 
       FIG. 11  shows an ‘Undo learning’ dialog  1100 . This dialog  1100  is similar to the dialog  1000 . However, in the dialog  1100 , the selected operations generate patterns that are removed from the module pattern file under selection. 
       FIG. 12  shows a properties window  1200  that tracks what kind of selection is made in the situation view and updates the content of the window  1200  accordingly. If a selection is made for an application under automatic learning the window  1200  shows a historical graph  1202  of appending new patterns to the correspondent pattern file. The example in  FIG. 12  shows that 182 operations have been scanned and 23 unique patterns have been extracted for Far.exe. A linear curve  1204  corresponds to the learning threshold currently set for stopping the automatic learning mode. The history graph is tracked across any number of runs of the situation detector until the automatic learning process finally stops. 
       FIG. 13  shows a properties window  1300  that shows how decisions have been made to assign a situation class. The view in  FIG. 13  can be understood with knowledge of the situation detection algorithm. Vertical lines painted in colors dependent on situation classes correspond to competing density/region values. A rightmost line  1302  represents the resulting decision on situation class assignment. A dashed black line  1304  corresponds to the density threshold currently set for assigning operations to an unknown situation. 
     In one embodiment, the formatting string for naming pattern files can be specified by the user. The macro string %s inserts the application module name (%s.db by default). The formatting string for naming backup pattern files can also be specified using the %s macro (%s.bak by default). A pattern base generation code can be specified. For example, a value of 2 indicates that tracking of patterns is made for the call stack level 0. A value of 3 indicates that tracking of patterns is made for every call stack level independently (by default). A value of 4 indicates that tracking of patterns is made by walking along call trees. A maximum pattern length can be specified as 2 or more (6 by default). In one embodiment, these values are set when a new pattern base is created. 
     In addition, users can customize the default values for locality frame size, abnormality ratio threshold, automatic learning saturation ratio threshold, etc. For example, in one embodiment, the default locality frame size can be specified as 2 or more (30 by default). In one embodiment, the default abnormality ratio threshold can be specified in the range [0, 1] (0.2 by default). In one embodiment, the default automatic learning saturation ratio threshold can be specified in the range [0, 1] (0 by default, i.e. no automatic stop). Default values for other parameters can also be set by users in other embodiments. 
     It will be evident to those skilled in the art that the invention is not limited to the details of the foregoing illustrated embodiments and that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential attributed thereof; furthermore, various omissions, substitutions and changes may be made without departing from the spirit of the inventions. The foregoing description of the embodiments is therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, with the scope of the invention being delineated by the appended claims and their equivalents.

Technology Classification (CPC): 6