Patent Abstract:
A protective structure for protecting buildings, bridges, roads and other areas from explosive devices such as car bombs and the like comprises: (a) a mesh structure having an outer surface and an inner surface, wherein the inner surface defines an annular space; (b) a plurality of structural steel cables in contact with the mesh structure; (c) a composite fill material which resides within the annular space of the mesh structure and within the mesh structure; (d) at least one reinforcement member which resides within the composite fill material; and (e) a composite face material which resides upon the outer surface of the mesh structure. The mesh structure may be made up of, for example, steel wire. A protective system for protecting buildings, bridges, roads and other areas from explosive devices such as car bombs and the like comprises a plurality of the above described protective structures and a plurality of support members, wherein the support members provide interlocking engagement of the protective structures to the support members.

Full Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
   This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/291,656, filed on Nov. 30, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,562,613, which is a continuation in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/741,307, filed on Dec. 19, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,973,864, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. 

   BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
   1. Field of the Invention 
   This invention is directed to a protective structure and to a protective system for protecting buildings, streets, and other areas from explosions caused by an explosive device such as a bomb. More particularly, the protective structure and protective system employ a membrane-like mesh structure made up of, for example, steel wire. The mesh structure surrounds a composite fill material such as reinforced concrete. The protective structure deflects in response to and absorbs the energy associated with the blast load of an explosion, and the mesh structure prevents composite fragments from injuring people or property in the vicinity of the explosion. The protective structure may be sacrificial in nature, i.e., its sole purpose is to absorb the energy from the explosive shock wave and contain composite debris caused by the explosion, or the protective structure may be employed as a load-bearing structural component. Accordingly, this results in reduction in personal injury and property damage due to the explosion. 
   2. Background Information 
   Protection of people, buildings, bridges etc. from attacks by car or truck bombs, remote controlled explosives, etc. is of increasing importance and necessity. The explosive force or pressure wave generated by an explosive device such as a car bomb may be sufficient (depending on the size of the explosive device used) to disintegrate a composite wall, thereby causing shrapnel-like pieces of composite to be launched in all directions, and causing additional personal injury and property damage. 
   Conventional reinforced composite structures such as reinforced concrete walls are well known to those skilled in the art. Such conventional structures typically employ steel reinforcement bars embedded within the composite structure or wall. However, in the case of an explosion or blast load which may generate a pressure wave in excess of tens of thousands of psi, a conventional reinforced composite structure will be ineffective in providing sufficient protection, and the blast load will cause disintegration of the composite, thereby causing shrapnel-like pieces of composite to be launched in all directions, and causing additional personal injury and property damage. 
   One example of a proposed solution for this problem is the Adler Blast Wall™ which, is made up of front and back face plates which contain a reinforced concrete fill material. According to the developers of the Adler Blast Wall™, if an explosion occurs proximate to the front face plate, the back face plate will catch any concrete debris which results from the explosion. However, if the back face plate of the Adler Blast Wall™ is sufficiently displaced in the horizontal or vertical direction due to the explosion, small pieces of concrete debris traveling at high velocities may escape, thereby causing personal injury or property damage. Accordingly, there is a need for a protective structure which further minimizes the possibility that such small pieces of concrete debris traveling at high velocities will escape the protective structure employed. 
   It is a first object of this invention to provide a blast resistant protective structure which minimizes the possibility that small pieces of concrete debris traveling at high velocities will escape the protective structure in the event of an explosion or blast load proximate to the structure. 
   It is one feature of the protective structure of this invention that it employs a membrane-like mesh structure made up of, for example, steel wire, and structural steel cables in contact with the mesh structure, for example welded to the mesh structure forming a cage around it, or interwoven into the mesh structure. The mesh structure is compressible in all three dimensions, and surrounds a composite fill material such as reinforced concrete, fiber reinforced plastics, molded plastics, or other composite plastics. In the event of an explosion proximate to the protective structure of this invention, the mesh structure advantageously prevents composite fragments produced due to disintegration of the composite fill material of the protective structure from injuring people or property in the vicinity of the explosion. 
   It is another feature of the protective structure of this invention that, in the event of an explosion proximate to the protective structure of this invention, the protective structure deflects in response to and absorbs the energy associated with the blast load of the explosion. 
   It is a second object of this invention to provide a protective system which employs a number of the above described protective structures which are joined together via a number of support members, thereby providing a protective wall of sufficient length to provide more complete protection of a given area as well as additional ease of construction and use. The protective system may be used, but is not limited to use in constructing buildings, tunnels, portals etc. 
   It is a feature of the protective system of the invention that the support members be capable of receiving the respective ends of the protective structures to provide an integrated wall structure. 
   It is another feature of the protective system of the invention that the support members may also employ a mesh structure made up of, for example, steel wire. The mesh structure may surround a composite fill material such as reinforced concrete, fiber reinforced plastics, molded plastics, or other composite plastics. Thus, in the event of an explosion proximate to the protective system of this invention, the mesh structure prevents concrete fragments produced due to disintegration of the concrete fill material of the support members from injuring people or property in the vicinity of the explosion. 
   Other objects, features and advantages of the protective structure and protective system of this invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the detailed description of the invention set forth herein. 
   SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
   A protective structure such as a protective wall for protecting buildings, bridges, roads and other areas from explosive devices such as car bombs and the like comprises: 
   (a) a mesh structure having an outer surface and an inner surface, wherein the inner surface defines an annular space; 
   (b) a plurality of structural steel cables in contact with the mesh structure; 
   (c) a composite fill material which resides within the annular space of the mesh structure and within the mesh structure; 
   (d) at least one reinforcement member which resides within the composite fill material; and 
   (e) a composite face material which resides upon the outer surface of the mesh structure. 
   A protective system such as a protective wall for protecting buildings, bridges, roads and other areas from explosive devices such as car bombs and the like comprises: 
   (I) a plurality of adjacent protective structures, wherein each protective structure has a first end and a second end, and each protective structure comprises:
         (a) a mesh structure having an outer surface and an inner surface, wherein the inner surface defines an annular space,   (b) a plurality of structural steel cables in contact with the mesh structure;   (c) a composite fill material which resides within the annular space of the mesh structure and within the mesh structure,   (d) at least one reinforcement member which resides within the composite fill material, and   (e) a composite face material which resides upon the outer surface of the mesh structure; and       

   (II) a plurality of support members, wherein the support members receive the first or second ends of the protective structures to provide interlocking engagement of the protective structures to the support members. 

   
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       FIG. 1  depict a cross-sectional view of a prior art reinforced composite wall protective structure. 
       FIG. 2  depicts a cross-sectional view of one embodiment of the protective structure of this invention. 
       FIG. 2A  depicts a cross-sectional expanded view of a portion of the protective structure of this invention depicted in  FIG. 2 . 
       FIG. 3  depicts a front view of one embodiment of the protective system of this invention. 
       FIG. 4  depicts a cross-sectional view of the deflection of one embodiment of the protective structure of this invention in response to a blast load. 
       FIG. 5  depicts a cross-sectional view of one embodiment of the protective system of this invention. 
       FIG. 6  depicts a cross-sectional view of a second embodiment of the protective system of this invention. 
       FIG. 7  depicts a third embodiment of the protective system of this invention. 
   

   DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
   This invention will be further understood in view of the following detailed description. Referring now to  FIG. 1 , there is depicted a cross-sectional view of a prior art reinforced composite wall protective structure. As shown in  FIG. 1 , composite wall  102  contains both vertically placed steel reinforcement bars  104  and horizontally placed steel reinforcement bars  106 . If an explosion occurred in the vicinity of the front face  108  of composite wall  102 , the composite material would disintegrate, and small pieces of composite debris traveling at high velocities would be produced, thus increasing the possibilities of personal injury and property damage due to such composite debris. 
     FIG. 2  depicts a cross-sectional view of one embodiment of the protective structure of this invention. As shown in  FIG. 2 , composite wall  202  contains membrane-like mesh structure  203  made up of steel wires  205 , as well as vertically placed steel reinforcement bars  204  (connected by steel tie members  201 ) and horizontally placed steel reinforcement bars  206 . Mesh structure  203  defines an annular region which contains composite fill material  207 . Structural steel cables  213  are woven horizontally into mesh structure  203 . Structural steel cables  211  are woven vertically into mesh structure  203 . Although shown only with respect to the rear face  209  of composite wall  202 , composite fill material  207  may and preferably does protrude through mesh structure  203  on all sides to provide composite face material  210 . If an explosion occurred in the vicinity of the front face  208  of composite wall  202 , the composite material would disintegrate, but small pieces of composite debris traveling at high velocities would be “caught” and contained within the mesh structure  203 , thus decreasing the possibilities of personal injury and property damage due to such composite debris. If desired, one or more additional mesh structures (not shown) may be attached or superimposed upon mesh structure  203 , thereby adding additional unit cell thickness and providing additional containment for small pieces of composite debris generated by disintegration of composite wall  202  after an explosion. 
     FIG. 2A  depicts a cross-sectional expanded view of a portion of the protective structure of this invention depicted in  FIG. 2 . As shown in  FIG. 2A , composite wall  202  contains mesh structure  203  made up of steel wires  205  which define mesh structure unit cells  215 , as well as vertically placed steel reinforcement bars  204  (connected by steel tie members  201 ) and horizontally placed steel reinforcement bars  206 . Mesh structure  203  defines an annular region which contains composite fill material  207 . The wire mesh which may be employed in the mesh structure is preferably made up of interconnected steel wires. Such steel wires will be selected based upon the assumed maximum blast load, the length of the protective structure, the grade strength of the steel employed in the mesh, and other factors. For example, steel wires having a thickness of 8 gage, 10 gage, 12 gage, or 16 gage may be employed. The mesh structure preferably comprises a plurality of mesh unit cells having a width in the range of about 0.75 to 1.75 inches and a length in the range of about 0.75 to 1.75 inches, although the opening size of the mesh structure may be optimally designed depending upon the properties of the composite fill material. Structural steel cables  213  are woven horizontally into mesh structure  203 . Structural steel cables  211  are woven vertically into mesh structure  203 . The steel cables may be spaced horizontally at a fraction of the height of the wall, for example the cables may be spaced apart at a distance of ¼ of the height of the wall. The steel cables may be spaced vertically at a fraction of the length of the wall, for example the cables may be spaced apart at a distance of ⅙ of the length of the wall. Steel cables having a thickness of from 16 gage to having a diameter of several inches may be employed. The steel cables may be single strand cables or composite cables made up of high strength steel wires. 
   It has previously been suggested, for example, in Conrath et al., Structural Design for Physical Security, pp. 4-46 (American Society of Civil Engineers-Structural Engineering Institute 1999) (ISBN 0-7844-0457-7), that wire mesh may be employed on or just beneath the front and rear surfaces of structural elements to mitigate “scabbing” (i.e., cratering of the front face due to the blast load) and “spalling” (i.e., separation of particles of structural element from the rear face at appropriate particle velocities) for light to moderate blast loads. However, in the protective structure of the present invention, the wire mesh structure employed does not merely mitigate scabbing and spalling for light to moderate blast loads. Instead, the wire mesh structure both prevents spalling at all blast loads (including high blast loads which generate a pressure wave in excess of tens of thousands of psi), and also enables the protective structure to deflect both elastically and inelastically in response to the blast load, as further discussed herein with respect to  FIG. 4 , such that the energy of the blast load is fully absorbed by the protective structure via large deflections of the protective structure. Due to such large deflections, the wire mesh structure is deformed permanently without any “rebound” back towards its initial position prior to the explosion. 
     FIG. 3  depicts a front view of one embodiment of the protective system of this invention. As shown in  FIG. 3 , the protective system  301  includes several protective structures of this invention  302 ,  312 , and  322  (each of which has the structure depicted in  FIG. 2 ) which are interconnected via the use of support members  315  and  325 . The support members  315  and  325  typically will have a length sufficient to enable the support members to be embedded in the ground for a significant portion of their total length, as shown for example, by support member portions  315   a  and  325   a  which are embedded in the ground  330  in  FIG. 3 . 
   The embedded depth for the support member portions  315   a  and  325   a  in the ground will be determined according to the subsurface soil conditions, as will be recognized by those skilled in the art. For example, in one preferred embodiment, the embedded length of the support member portions in the soil will be a minimum of about one-third of the total length of each support member. 
   In another preferred embodiment, the support members comprise a mesh structure. The mesh structure of the support members may preferably comprise a plurality of interconnected steel wires. Such steel wires will be selected based upon the assumed maximum blast load, the length of the protective structure, the grade strength of the steel employed in the mesh, and other factors. For example, steel wires having a thickness of 8 gage, 10 gage, 12 gage, or 16 gage may be employed. The mesh structure, if employed, preferably comprises a plurality of mesh unit cells having a width in the range of about 0.75 to 1.75 inches, and a length in the range of about 0.75 to 1.75 inches, although the opening size of the mesh structure may be optimally designed depending upon the properties of the composite fill material. The mesh structure, if employed, preferably surrounds a composite fill material such as reinforced concrete. The composite fill material preferably protrudes through the mesh structure on all sides to provide a composite face material for the support member. Vertically and horizontally placed steel cables may be in contact with the mesh structure. 
     FIG. 4  depicts a cross-sectional view of the deflection of one embodiment of the protective structure of this invention in response to a blast load. As shown in  FIG. 4 , a protective structure of this invention  412  is interconnected to support members  415  and  425 . Protective structure  412  has a length L as shown. Upon explosion of an explosive device proximate to the front face  408  of protective structure  412 , the wire mesh (not shown in  FIG. 4 ) will deflect in response to the blast load, thereby causing both front face  408  and rear face  409  of protective structure  412  to deflect a distance D (shown in dashed lines). For the protective structure of this invention, which is designed to undergo large deflections to absorb the energy from the explosion, deflection of the protective structure (i.e. the D/L ratio) may be as large as about 25%, say 10-25%. 
     FIG. 5  depicts a cross-sectional view of one embodiment of the protective system of this invention. As shown in  FIG. 5 , the protective system  501  includes several protective structures  503  and  505  which are interconnected via the use of support member  507 . Steel cables  509 ,  510 ,  511 , and  512  are woven horizontally into wire mesh structures  513  and  514  and are interconnected within support member  507 . Steel cable  509  is connected to turnbuckle  515  within support member  507 . Steel cable  510  is connected to turnbuckle  517  within support member  507 . Steel cable  511  is connected to turnbuckle  518  within support member  507 . Steel cable  512  is connected to turnbuckle  516  within support member  507 . Turnbuckles  515  and  517 , are connected to steel cable  520  which loops around steel reinforcement members  522  and  523 . Turnbuckles  516  and  518  are connected to steel cable  519  which loops around steel reinforcement members  521  and  524 . 
   Turnbuckles are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art as described for example in  Manual of steel Construction , American Institute of Steel Construction, p. 4-149 ( 9   th  Ed. Oct. 1994). 
     FIG. 6  depicts a cross-sectional view of another embodiment of the protective system of this invention. As shown in  FIG. 6 , the protective structure  601  includes several protective structures  603  and  605  which are interconnected via the use of support member  607 . Concrete fill  646  protrudes through mesh structure  613  to form front and back faces  644  of protective structure  603 . Concrete fill  642  protrudes through mesh structure  614  to form front and back faces  640  of protective structure  605 . Steel cable  609  is woven horizontally into wire mesh structure  613  and is connected to turnbuckle  615 . Steel cable  610  is woven horizontally into wire mesh structure  614  and is connected to turnbuckle  616 . Steel cable  611  is woven horizontally into wire mesh structure  613  and is connected to turnbuckle  617 . Steel cable  612  is woven horizontally into wire mesh structure  614  and is connected to turnbuckle  618 . Steel cable  619  is connected to turnbuckles  616  and  618  and loops around steel reinforcement members  627  and  631 . Steel cable  620  is connected to turnbuckles  615  and  617  and loops around steel reinforcement members  629  and  633 . 
     FIG. 7  depicts another embodiment of this invention. In  FIG. 7 , a portion of a building structure (in this case a tower  700 ) is shown. Tower  700  has as its exterior facade mesh structure  703  made up of steel wires  705  as well as structural steel cables  713  woven horizontally into mesh structure  703  and structural steel cables  711  woven vertically into mesh structure  703  (not all of the structural steel cables  711  are shown). The mesh structure defines an annular region which contains composite fill material  707  (which in this case is concrete). The concrete fill material may and preferably does protrude through mesh structure  703  to provide a concrete face material (not shown) which may form the exterior surfaces of tower  700 . Alternatively, the concrete fill material may not protrude through mesh structure  703 , in which case a separate face material (not shown) may be affixed to the concrete fill material or otherwise form the visible exterior surface of tower  700 . As shown in  FIG. 7 , steel cables  711  extend below the ground surface  750  and are joined or anchored at points  752  and  754 . 
   In another embodiment, the protective system may contain apertures formed by a plurality of mesh structures. For example, apertures for architectural features such as windows and doors may be provided between the mesh structures. 
   While not wishing to be limited to any one theory, it is theorized that the deflection of the protective structure of this invention in response to a blast load may be analogized or modeled as wires in tension. Upon explosion of the explosive device and delivery of the blast load to the protective structure, the steel wires of the mesh structure absorb the energy of the blast load. Employing this model, the membrane stiffness of the mesh wire (K) is defined as:
 
 K=P   e   /D   e  
 
where P e  is the load corresponding to the elastic limit of the wire mesh structure and D e  is the deflection corresponding to P e , and the time period of oscillation of the wire mesh structure (T) (in milliseconds) is defined as:
 
 T= 1000/ω
 
where ω is the frequency of oscillation in cycles per second (cps), which is defined as
 
ω=(½π)( K/m ) 1/2  
 
where m is the mass per foot-width of the mesh structure.
 
   Using the above equations, various design parameters such as the wire gage, size of the mesh unit cell opening, steel grade, etc. may be selected for various blast loads, as set forth in Table 1 below. These design parameters pertain to the mesh structure itself, not including the steel cables. 
                                                                                                                     TABLE 1                           Wire   Wire                               T           Wire   Diameter   Area(A)   ΣA   R u     P e     D e     K   m   ω   (milli-           Gage #   (in.)   (in. 2 )   (in 2 )   (k)   (k)   (in.)   (#/in)   (lb-s 2 /in.)   (cps)   seconds)                                    F y  = 36 ksi   16   0.062   0.003   0.290   10.44   1.09   3.77   289   0.0308   15   66       L m  = 72 in.   12   0.106   0.0088   0.847   30.48   3.18   3.77   893   0.0899   15   66           10   0.135   0.014   1.373   49.44   5.16   3.77   1,368   0.1458   15   66       F y  = 50 ksi   16   0.062   0.003   0.290   14.50   1.707   4.15   411   0.0308   18.4   54       L m  = 72 in.   12   0.106   0.0088   0.847   42.35   4.985   4.15   1201   0.0899   18.4   54           10   0.135   0.014   1.373   68.65   8.082   4.15   1947   0.1458   18.4   54                    
where:
 
   ΣA is the sum of the area of the wires per 1 foot-width of mesh structure 
   R u  is the ultimate load capacity of the wire mesh per foot 
   F y  is the yield stress of the wire 
   L m  is the span of the wire mesh structure 
   As set forth in Table 1, the time period T is a critical design parameter which may be designed for in the protective structure of this invention. For a given explosion or blast load, it is expected that the time duration of the blast load (t d ) will be in the order of a few milliseconds, say 5-10 milliseconds. The mesh structure employed in the protective structure of this invention will be designed such that it will have a time period T much greater than t d ; typically T is of the order of 5-20 times greater in duration than t d . 
   It should be understood that various changes and modifications to the preferred embodiments herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention and without diminishing its attendant advantages. It is therefore intended that such changes and modifications be covered by the appended claims.

Technology Classification (CPC): 5