Patent Abstract:
One embodiment of the present invention provides a system that tests the motion performance of an electronic display system, wherein the electronic display system includes a display, graphics processing software, graphics processing circuitry, and an interface coupling the display and the graphics processing circuitry. The system starts by receiving a request to measure an amount of distortion of an object in motion. In response to the request, the system measures the amount of distortion of the object in motion. In a variation on this embodiment, measuring the amount of distortion of the object in motion involves placing a ruler on a boundary of the object where the distortion occurs, increasing the width of the ruler until it covers the distortion, and then measuring the width to determine the size of the distortion.

Full Description:
RELATED APPLICATION 
   This application hereby claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/504,116 filed on 18 Sep. 2003, entitled “Motion Artifact Detection and Analysis Tool,” by inventors Eric Boucher and Joseph V. Miseli, and to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/514,870 filed on 27 Oct. 2003, entitled “Motion Artifact Detection and Analysis Tool,” by inventors Eric Boucher and Joseph V. Miseli. 

   BACKGROUND 
   1. Field of the Invention 
   The present invention relates to video displays. More specifically, the present invention relates to a method and an apparatus for detecting motion-induced artifacts on electronic display systems. 
   2. Related Art 
   Liquid Crystal Displays (LCDs) have considerably more difficulty than traditional Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) displays in accurately reproducing moving video images. In recent years, LCDs have advanced beyond CRTs in size and resolution, and are becoming comparable to CRTs in visual performance. During this time, visual performance issues, in which the LCDs lag the CRTs, have been addressed and have been improved significantly. However, until recently, the motion performance of LCDs has been considered, but only basic performance with regard to pixel response time and simple motion artifacts has been addressed. 
   In determining the performance of LCD displays, many manufacturers qualify the product to assure that motion on the displays is within good engineering bounds. They may do simple image movement testing or response time testing to quantify it. To date, their assessment techniques and options are quite limited. 
   Until other performance issues were addressed, motion performance issues for LCDs have generally been on the back burner. Now that these other performance issues have been controlled, it is time to deal with motion performance issues in LCDs. 
   Hence, what is needed is a method and an apparatus for testing motion performance in LCDs and other electronic display systems without the limitations listed above. 
   SUMMARY 
   One embodiment of the present invention provides a system that tests the motion performance of an electronic display system, wherein the electronic display system is comprised of a display, graphics processing software, graphics processing circuitry, and an interface coupling the display and the graphics processing circuitry. The system starts by receiving a request to measure an amount of distortion of an object in motion. In response to the request, the system measures the amount of distortion of the object in motion. 
   In a variation on this embodiment, the system displays a second object and measures the distortion that occurs when the two objects interact. 
   In a variation on this embodiment, the system receives a request to change a visual attribute of the object. In response to this request, the system changes the visual attribute of the object. 
   In a further variation, the visual attribute can include color, size, shape, shading, fill pattern, speed, direction of movement, and type of movement. 
   In a variation on this embodiment, measuring the amount of distortion of the object in motion involves placing a ruler on a boundary of the object where the distortion occurs, increasing the width of the ruler until it covers the distortion, and then measuring the width to determine the size of the distortion. 
   In a further variation, the ruler is displayed every n th  display cycle to minimize distortion of the ruler. 
   In a further variation, the width of the ruler is used to determine the response time of pixels in the display for any color or gray scale level. 
   In a variation on this embodiment, the distortion can include flickering, flashing, smearing, bluring, line spreading, geometric distortion, color-induced artifacts, and inaccurate color reproduction. 
   In a variation on this embodiment, the system stores the set of test parameters to a storage medium to facilitate producing an identical set of test parameters during a subsequent test. 
   In a variation on this embodiment, the system records the measured distortion on a storage medium. Note that this facilitates in creating a benchmark and a report for a display system under test and provides information for characterizing the display performance over multiple test conditions. 

   
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES 
       FIG. 1  illustrates a system that tests displays for motion artifacts in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. 
       FIG. 2  illustrates the structure of display-testing software in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. 
       FIG. 3  illustrates the geometry configuration portion of the display-testing GUI in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. 
       FIG. 4  illustrates the color configuration portion of the display-testing GUI in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. 
       FIG. 5  illustrates the measurements configuration portion of the display-testing GUI in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. 
       FIG. 6  presents a flow chart illustrating the process of testing a display for motion artifacts in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. 
       FIG. 7  illustrates measuring a motion-induced artifact in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. 
   

   DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
   The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein. 
   The data structures and code described in this detailed description are typically stored on a computer readable storage medium, which may be any device or medium that can store code and/or data for use by a computer system. This includes, but is not limited to, magnetic and optical storage devices such as disk drives, magnetic tape, CDs (compact discs) and DVDs (digital versatile discs or digital video discs), and computer instruction signals embodied in a transmission medium (with or without a carrier wave upon which the signals are modulated). For example, the transmission medium may include a communications network, such as the Internet. 
   Display-Testing for Motion Artifacts 
     FIG. 1  illustrates a system for testing displays for motion artifacts in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The system illustrated in  FIG. 1  comprises server  104  and client  108  which are coupled to network  100 . Note that server  104  can generally include any computational node including a mechanism for servicing requests from a client for computational and/or data storage resources. Also, note that client  108  can generally include any node on a network including computational capability and including a mechanism for communicating across the network. Network  100  can generally include any type of wire or wireless communication channel capable of coupling together computing nodes. This includes, but is not limited to, a local area network, a wide area network, or a combination of networks. In one embodiment of the present invention, network  100  includes the Internet. 
   Display  102  is the display that is being tested for motion artifacts. Note that the motion artifacts can be caused by any part of the display system, including graphics processing circuitry, the interface coupling the graphics processing circuitry to the display, and the display itself. Display  102  is coupled to server  104 . Also coupled to server  104  is keyboard  105  and mouse  106 . During the testing process, observer  112  may use GUI  110  on client  108  to manipulate objects on display  102  to test for motion induced artifacts. Additionally, observer  112  may use keyboard  105  and/or mouse  106  to manipulate objects on display  102 . 
   Display-Testing Software 
     FIG. 2  illustrates the structure of display-testing software in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In one embodiment of the present invention, this software is known as the Motion Artifact Detection and Analysis Tool (MADAT). In this embodiment, MADAT is installed on server  104 , and is comprised of engine  200 , as well as various support modules. These modules can include, network interface module  201 , timer control module  202 , object control module  204 , color control module  206 , analysis module  208 , overlay engine module  210 , file manipulation module  212 , miscellaneous module  214 , and display module  216 . 
   Network interface module  201  allows engine  200  to communicate with GUI  110 . Note that GUI  110  can exist on any machine coupled to network  100 , or even on server  104  itself. 
   Overlay engine module  210  allows two objects to be controlled simultaneously in order to test the interaction of two moving objects. Overlay engine module  210  is comprised of an almost identical set of components as the MADAT software itself. For instance, within overlay engine module  210 , you will find a timer control, an object control, and a color control. 
   Display module  216  takes input from timer control module  202 , object control module  204 , color control module  206  and overlay engine module  210 , and uses these inputs to determine a set of graphical images to output to display  102 , which is the display under test. 
   GUI—Geometry Configuration 
     FIG. 3  illustrates the geometry configuration portion of GUI  110  in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. GUI  110  allows observer  112  to set various attributes related to the geometry of the object being used to test display  102 . These attributes can include oscillation, angle, line attributes, location, dimensions, and shape. Note that in addition to GUI  110 , observer  112  may use the command-line interface with keyboard  105  to implement all of the functionality accessible via GUI  110 . The command-line interface offers additional speed, compactness, and flexibility. 
   GUI  110  allows observer  112  to take control of virtually every aspect of the visual environment of display  102 . Observer  112  may select from a set of pre-define objects, as well as importing a custom object. In addition, observer  112  may select two objects to additionally test for artifacts caused by the interaction of the two objects. 
   In one embodiment of the present invention, observer  112  may set the motion type of the object to linear, linear oscillation, or sinusoidal oscillation. During sinusoidal oscillation, the object moves the fastest through the center of oscillation, and the slowest at the end points. In the instances where oscillation is chosen, observer  112  can choose the width and the frequency of oscillation. 
   Additionally, observer  112  can change the direction of motion as well as the speed. In one embodiment of the present invention, speed is referred to as pixels per refresh, or simply the number of pixels the object moves on the display for each refresh cycle of the display. Since the display size and refresh rate is known to the program, speed can also be expressed in various other terms, such as inches per second. 
   In one embodiment of the present invention, observer  112  may use GUI  110 , as well as clicking and dragging portions of the object itself to alter the object&#39;s geometry. 
   GUI—Color Configuration 
     FIG. 4  illustrates the color configuration portion of GUI  110  in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. GUI  110  allows observer  112  to set various attributes related to the color of the object being used to test display  102 . These attributes can include line colors, foreground colors, background colors, and gradient shading. 
   Note that it is important to consider color when testing a display for motion-produced artifacts. Since pixels on a display may exhibit different response times to turn on or off for different colors, distortions may not be noticeable for one set of colors, but may be extremely noticeable with another set of colors. 
   GUI—Measurement Configuration 
     FIG. 5  illustrates the measurements configuration portion of GUI  110  in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. GUI  110  allows observer  112  to set various attributes related to the measuring of the artifacts produced on display  102 . These attributes can include the types of measurement rulers, the colors of the rulers, and the deltas of the rulers. 
   When observer  112  notices an artifact or distortion, observer  112  may choose to measure the distortion by displaying rulers along with the object that is being distorted. In one embodiment of the present invention, one ruler is placed along the leading edge of the moving object, and another ruler is placed on the trailing edge. The rules may be widened, represented by the delta value, to cover the area of the distortion. Once the ruler covers the distortion completely, the delta value indicates the amount of distortion caused by the moving object with a specific set of visual attributes. The delta value can then be used to compute the response times for the pixels under the given visual attributes. Note that the ruler on the leading edge measures the response time for the pixels to turn on, while the trailing edge ruler measures the response time for the pixels to turn off. Note that rulers can be any shape or size including, but not limited to, lines, shapes, background images, and multiple lines. Also note that the rulers may be oriented in any direction and attached to any portion of the artifact. 
   In one embodiment of the present invention, the rulers may be displayed at every n refresh cycles of display  102 . This allows for greater accuracy in measuring the distortion by minimizing motion artifacts caused by the rulers moving. 
   Testing Displays for Motion Artifacts 
     FIG. 6  presents a flow chart illustrating the process of testing a display for motion artifacts in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. A video image is generated which shows an object moving across display  102  in time. An ideal display will produce the object precisely, with no temporal degradation. Display  102  may have latency, response time limitations, real time processing (timing) difficulties, real-time color rendering delays, and a host of other temporal processing inaccuracies which may contribute to reproducing the content with distortions, or artifacts. The moving object may be visible on display  102  producing artifacts of various types, including flickering, flashing, smearing, distorting, producing inaccurate colors, etc. These are all undesired temporal distortions. Ideally, the object should look exactly the same to observer  112  while the object is in motion and while the object is still. In addition, the object should look the same over time and be free from temporal distortions that are not motion-induced. 
   The distortion in such a case can be easily observed. However, the characteristics of the human visual system can contribute to some perceptions of distortion that may not actually be generated on display  102 . It is a major part of this program to provide enough tools and control to help definitively assess the motion distortion using other than the eye of observer  112 . 
   The system starts by producing an image (step  602 ) and displaying the image on display  102  (step  604 ). Note that the image can include a pre-defined image such as a line, a hollow box, a filled box, a hollow ellipse, a filled ellipse, a hollow triangle, a filled triangle, random line patterns, or a custom image that observer  112  imports. Note that different images can produce different types of motion-induced artifacts. Observer  112  views the image (step  606 ) and manipulates the controls that produce the image via GUI  110 , and or keyboard  105  and mouse  106 , (step  608 ). As the image controls are manipulated, the system repeats steps  602  through  608 . Upon discovering a noticeable artifact, the system may analyze the image (step  610 ), or provide adequate control for subjective determination of the artifact by observer  112 . 
   Note that the motion artifacts can be caused by any part or on any part of the display system. For example, in one embodiment of the present invention, artifacts may be observed that are the result of poor response time for pixels within an LCD display. Artifacts may also result from a flaw in the graphics processing circuitry or the software that generates the images for the display. Furthermore, artifacts may be observed that are the result of characteristics on the transmission lines between the graphics processor and the display such as cross-talk, amplitude dependencies, and skew. 
   Measuring a Motion-Induced Artifact 
     FIG. 7  illustrates measuring a motion-induced artifact in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Analysis of the image is a combination of the subjective, which requires the input of observer  112 , and numerical analysis which is done by the system itself. Due to the dynamic nature of the system, observer  112  is able to constantly manipulate the attributes of the display system to detect and quantify any number of visual artifacts. In some instances, artifacts might be easily detectable but difficult to quantify, such as flickering of the object. In these cases, the system facilitates in producing artifacts so that subjective analysis and reporting can begin. 
   One type of numerical analysis is performed by creating guides or rules along portions of the object being displayed. In one embodiment, one ruler (ruler  702 ) is created on the leading edge of moving object  700 , and another ruler (ruler  704 ) is created on the trailing edge. By altering a delta value for each ruler, the width of the rulers can be changed to completely cover the area of distortion on each of the edges of the object. For instance, the delta value can be changed for ruler  702  until it completely covers artifact  706 , and the delta value for ruler  704  can be changed until it completely covers artifact  708 . Theoretically, the delta should remain at zero, even while object  700  is in motion. However, as motion is introduced and the various attributes of object  700  are modified, it is possible to measure the differences as the distortion occurs. This aids in quantifying the distortion in addition to describing the distortion. 
   The delta of leading edge ruler  702  can be used to quantify the response time for the pixels to turn on for the given set of visual attributes. Likewise, the delta of trailing edge ruler  704  can be used to quantify the response time for the pixels to turn off for the given set of visual attributes. Note that it may be important for the rulers  702  and  704  to be displayed every n th  refresh cycle so that distortion of the rulers in motion does not come into play. 
   The foregoing descriptions of embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description only. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present invention to the forms disclosed. Accordingly, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. Additionally, the above disclosure is not intended to limit the present invention. The scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.

Technology Classification (CPC): 6