Patent Abstract:
Two separate radio frequency networks may be operated within interference distance from one another in a way which mitigates the possibility of interference. Using received signal strength indicator data, the nature of the interference may be determined without actually demodulating the interfering signal. The timing of the interfering signal and its characteristic features may be determined. Using that information, together with the probability that any given slot will actually be occupied by an interfering transmission, a statistics package may be developed which gives an indication of the probability of a transmission from the interferer at any given time. That package may be transmitted to other nodes in the same network. When a first node wishes to transmit information to a second node, the first node may analyze the statistics package received from the second node. The first node may thereby make a determination about when to actually initiate the transmission to the second node.

Full Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION 
       [0001]    This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/652,697, filed Aug. 31, 2000. 
     
    
     BACKGROUND 
       [0002]    This invention relates generally to wireless systems including wireless local area network devices. 
         [0003]    Packet-based wireless local area network (LAN) devices enable a plurality of clients to be coupled together with a server without the need for extensive wiring. The IEEE 802.11 family of standards (IEEE Standard 802.11 available from the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, N.Y.) describes a standard for wireless LAN systems. It involves the use of either 2.4 GHz Industrial, Scientific and Medical (ISM) or 5 GHz communication frequency bands. These bands are minimally regulated and, as a result, other interfering wireless devices (that do not comply with the IEEE 802.11 standard) may be transmitting in the same area in the same band. 
         [0004]    As an example, within a given office that is utilizing a system compliant with the IEEE 802.11 standard, other individuals may utilize devices compliance with the Bluetooth specification (V.1.0, Dec. 1, 1999) for wireless devices. Like the IEEE 802.11 standard, the Bluetooth devices also operate in the 2.4 GHz ISM band. 
         [0005]    Interference may result between the Bluetooth and packet-based wireless LAN devices. Generally, in the case of Bluetooth devices, their power output is relatively small relative to the wireless LAN devices. However, a proximate Bluetooth device may adversely affect and interfere with the reception of a local wireless LAN device. Another device in the LAN may transmit to a local LAN device proximate a Bluetooth transmitter. The remote LAN transmitter may have no idea that a lower power Bluetooth transmitter may also be transmitting. As a result, interference may occur which varies depending on the receiver that is receiving the signal. 
         [0006]    Proposals for mitigating the effects of interference between Bluetooth and packet-based wireless LANs operating in the same frequency band generally have relied upon frequency orthogonality. However, such techniques may be ineffective when the Bluetooth and wireless LAN devices are in close proximity which, of course, is when the interference is most substantial. 
         [0007]    Thus, there is a need for a way to mitigate interference between wireless devices operating on different standards within the same frequency band. In addition, there is a need for a system that accommodates for the problems that arise when various devices in a wireless network are not aware that receivers in that network may be proximate to non-compliant transmitters operating within the same frequency band. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
         [0008]      FIG. 1  is a schematic depiction of one embodiment of the present invention; 
           [0009]      FIG. 2  is a block diagram of a portion of the mitigation module shown in  FIG. 1  in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention; 
           [0010]      FIG. 3  is a depiction of a statistics package format utilized to transmit information between nodes in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention; 
           [0011]      FIG. 4  is a block diagram for another component of the mitigation module shown in  FIG. 1  in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention; 
           [0012]      FIG. 5  shows a hypothetical statistics package waveform in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention and further illustrates how the statistics package may be utilized to determine when to transmit information to a receiver in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention; 
           [0013]      FIG. 6  is a schematic depiction of a wireless LAN network with proximate Bluetooth transmitters in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention; and 
           [0014]      FIG. 7  is a flow chart for software in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION  
       [0015]    Referring to  FIG. 1 , a node  10  in a wireless local area network (LAN) may be positioned proximate to a Bluetooth piconet  11 . The Bluetooth piconet  11  may operate in accordance with the Bluetooth specification. The wireless LAN node  10  may operate in accordance with one of the wireless LAN standards such as the IEEE 802.11 standard. The node  10  and the piconet  11  may operate in the same frequency band such as the 2.4 GHz Industrial, Scientific and Medical (ISM) band which is minimally regulated. The node  10  includes a mitigation module  16  that is responsible for mitigating potential interference between the Bluetooth piconet  11  (which is not part of the wireless LAN that includes the node  10 ) and the node  10  itself. 
         [0016]    The wireless LAN node  10  also includes a physical layer  12  such as a modulator/demodulator or modem and a medium access control unit (MAC)  14 . The physical layer may receive a received signal strength indication (RSSI) signal from the physical layer  12 . The RSSI signal is conventionally utilized in association with what is known as a channel access control. 
         [0017]    The raw RSSI data, received from the physical layer  12 , is also utilized by the mitigation module  16 . The mitigation module  16  uses the RSSI data to detect transmission of any devices that are not part of the LAN, such as transmission from a Bluetooth piconet. The mitigation module  16  subsequently develops statistics about the operation of such Bluetooth piconets. The statistics may then be used to predict when any device in the Bluetooth piconet may be transmitting. This prediction information may then be utilized to modify the transmission time of a transmitter within the LAN to avoid transmitting when a potentially interfering Bluetooth piconet is more likely to also be transmitting. 
         [0018]    While Bluetooth and 802.11 embodiments are described, the present invention is not limited to such examples. Embodiments may be implemented to avoid interference between wireless transmitters in a variety of circumstances. 
         [0019]    The statistical data developed by the mitigation module  16  is provided to the MAC  14 . The MAC  14  then provides that information to other LAN network transmitters wirelessly coupled to the node  10 . In addition, the MAC  14  may use data received from other nodes in the LAN network to determine when to operate its own physical layer  12  in a transmission mode so as to reduce the likelihood of interfering with transmissions by Bluetooth piconets proximate to the internal wireless LAN receiver. Thus, the mitigation module  16  includes a statistics generating unit  18  and a collision probability estimator  44 . 
         [0020]    The Bluetooth specification compliant piconet  11  transmits data in regularly occurring bursts. These bursts may appear as relatively rectangular signal blocks that occur at regular intervals. Thus, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, when the node  10  is neither sending or receiving wireless LAN signals, it is assumed that any background noise received by the antenna  15  is the result of a Bluetooth transmission signal. A Bluetooth signal includes a telltale 625 microsecond repeat interval or pattern. Each 625 microsecond interval is called a “slot”. The pattern of slot occupancy repeats with a period that is at most six slots and is always a factor of six. However, any given slot may or may not be occupied with a transmission depending on the particular protocol utilized by the proximate Bluetooth piconet  11 . 
         [0021]    The Bluetooth piconet  11  transmits in recurring slots starting from a synchronization reference point. That is, each 625 microsecond slot begins at a synchronization reference point. Information about the synchronization reference point, the slot occupancy probability, and the nature of the 625 microsecond transmission intervals may be collected over time. A probability may then be developed to determine the likelihood of interference between a transmission received by the node  10  and the noise received from the Bluetooth piconet  11 . 
         [0022]    In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, it is not necessary to actually demodulate the RSSI data. This may be important in some embodiments because to do so may require that the node  10  include a Bluetooth compliant receiver. By identifying the Bluetooth signal and the background RSSI noise without demodulating the signal, sufficient information may be obtained, in some embodiments, about the nature of the proximate Bluetooth transmitter to decrease the likelihood of interference. 
         [0023]    As mentioned above, not all of the slots of a Bluetooth transmission may be occupied. Different Bluetooth protocols (such as HV1) may occupy or use different ones of the recurring set of six slots. For example, the HV1 protocol transmits data in every other slot. Thus, that Bluetooth protocol sends bursts of data in alternating 625 microsecond intervals with a six slot repeat. In general, the empty slots occur in a regular pattern in each six slot sequence. 
         [0024]    By following the sequence of six slots, even without initially knowing which slot is the first slot of the sequence, the node  10  can find the empty slots and can determine the periodicity of those empty slots. 
         [0025]    The statistics generating unit  18  may sample the RSSI data received from the physical layer  12  at regular intervals. Since the slot is 625 microseconds in length, advantageously the sample rate of the unit  18  is integrally dividable into 625. One such advantageous sampling rate is 25 microseconds. This rate may be sufficiently fine to locate the start and stop of Bluetooth transmission within a given slot without unreasonably increasing the design requirements for the node  10 . 
         [0026]    The statistics generating unit  18 , shown in  FIG. 2 , includes an inhibit line  32  coupled to the MAC  14 . When the MAC  14  is operating the physical layer  12  to transmit or receive data, the inhibit line  32  terminates the generation of statistic packages. This inhibition avoids generating statistics packages when the data may be obscured by the ongoing receipt or transmission of wireless LAN data (not pursuant to the competing protocol such as the Bluetooth protocol). Therefore, the analysis may be simplified and the results may be improved in some embodiments, by inhibiting the statistics package generation during intervals when the node  10  itself is either transmitting or receiving. 
         [0027]    A synchronization estimate is achieved using an integrator  20 , an offset removal unit  22 , a shift register  24 , a Bluetooth slot pattern correlate  36  and a Bluetooth slot pattern correlate  40 . The synchronization estimate is based on a known pattern that repeats with known periodicity. The integrator  20  integrates the RSSI data over each sample interval and develops an average level for the RSSI data. The DC offset removal unit  22  takes the average measurements and resolves them to zero over an extended time period. Thereby, the unit  22  removes any DC offset in the RSSI data. 
         [0028]    The shift register  24  accumulates the integrated sample levels over a period of time. In one embodiment of the present invention, with a twenty-five microsecond sample rate, the shift register  24  may be capable of storing twenty-five samples and re-circulating those samples. That is, in order to analyze the  625  microsecond slot pattern, successive sets of twenty-five samples are stored one on top of the other in the twenty-five locations within the shift register  24 . Periodically, data is shifted out of the shift register  24  to the Bluetooth slot pattern correlate  40 . 
         [0029]    The unit  18  likely begins its analysis at an indeterminate point within the sequence of slots transmitted by the Bluetooth piconet  11 . That is, the unit  18  initially has no way to know whether the slot it first receives happens to be the first slot in a sequence of six slots generated by the piconet  11 . The correlate  40  finds the start point of the sequence of six slots. When the correlate  40  sees a peak in the data received from the shift register  24 , the correlate  40  knows where the Bluetooth transmission pattern starts. Thus, by progressively overlaying the data in the shift register  24  over a sufficient period of time, the start of the slot sequence may be identified based on the time location of the peak level. 
         [0030]    The correlate  36  determines whether there is a transmission in a given slot. The correlate  40  finds where each  625  microsecond slot is, averaged over time. 
         [0031]    When the inhibit line  32  is active, the shift register  24  simply recycles or re-circulates without new input data to maintain synchronization with its previous analyses. Thus, data is shifted from the shift register  24  to the accumulator  26  and then summed with new data in the summer  28  during non-inhibited operation. In inhibited operations, the data simply circulates back to the shift register  24  through the combiner  30  that has been operated by the inhibit line  32  signal to block new input data and to simply circulate the current data residing in the shift register  24 . 
         [0032]    The slot occupancy estimation unit  38  coordinates the start of each slot and determines, based on the data from the magnitude and synchronization unit  42  and the correlate  36 , where the slot begins using the local time base. The magnitude and synchronization unit  42  determines if there is any Bluetooth transmitter that has been recognized based on the RSSI data and determines if there is a peak in the data from the Bluetooth slot pattern correlate  40 . The magnitude and synchronization unit  42  tells the slot occupancy estimation unit  38  that a Bluetooth signal has been identified (or not) and provides a reference or start point for the first slot. 
         [0033]    The estimation unit  38  then figures out if there is anything in each of the six slots. The output from the slot occupancy estimation unit  38  may be of the format shown at  60  in  FIG. 5 . It may in the form of high pulses  62  and low pulses  64  that provide estimated Bluetooth transmission probabilities at given times. This information is a compilation of the timing of the slots of the local Bluetooth piconet  11  and the slot occupancy probability. Thus, the pulse  62  indicates a higher probability of a Bluetooth transmission occurring while the pulse  64  indicates a lower probability. 
         [0034]    The combination of data including a synchronization reference point and a slot occupancy probability estimation function may be represented as condensed data set with which to estimate the probability of a future time frequency collision with a detected Bluetooth piconet. For example, this data may be compacted into a single 32-bit word that constitutes the statistics package communicated to one or more other nodes in a wireless LAN network. 
         [0035]    Referring to  FIG. 3 , the 32-bit word, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, may include a six tuple containing six probability estimates of two bits each, one for each Bluetooth slot. In addition, the 32-bit word may include a timing synchronization function (TSF) reference that provides time information that is correlated to the recognized time base within the wireless LAN network. The TSF data may, for example, be in accordance with the TSF standard set forth in the IEEE 802.11 specification. The TSF reference may be the least significant bits from a TSF timer, divided by twenty-five at the start of the first slot. 
         [0036]    By providing the statistics package in a compact format, the statistics package may be readily and conveniently transmitted to all the nodes in a given network to advise them of the local conditions at each node. If each node transmits it own package during slack intervals, it is advantageous to provide the packages in a compact format to avoid any significant overall reduction of network bandwidth. 
         [0037]    Each node  10  mitigation module  16  may also include a collision probability estimator  44  ( FIG. 1 ). The estimator  44  receives the statistics package from a unit  38  of a node to which the node  10  intends to transmit data. Thus, in effect, the received statistics package provides information about the local interference conditions proximate to the intended recipient node. 
         [0038]    The estimator  44  receives a transmit request  66 , shown in  FIG. 5 . The estimator  44  compares the transmit request  66  to the statistics package  60 . It initiates a transmit holdoff signal  68  that causes the transmission of the transmit request  66  to be shifted in time to a time when the probability of a collision is lower. Thus, if a request seeks a transmission at time  66  which would overlap with a higher probability pulse  62 , the transmission may be held off so that at most it overlaps with a pulse  64  indicating a lower probability of an overlap with a Bluetooth piconet transmission. 
         [0039]    The estimator  44 , shown in  FIG. 4 , expands the data contained in the statistics package  60 . Based on a timer, the estimator  44  knows what time it is. The estimator  44  takes the statistics package (such as the package  60  in  FIG. 5 ) including the time data received from the local sample interval unit  52  and the local slot number  50  and maps that data against the current time. The sample interval unit  52  supplies the sample interval information (e.g., 25 microseconds). The local slot number  50  may supply the slot interval (e.g., 625 microseconds). The global sample interval  54  aligns the statistics data to the correct time by calculating the time relative to the statistics package. Based on the current time, the probability estimator  44  determines the occupancy probability for the next six Bluetooth slots. 
         [0040]    The probability estimator  45  provides the ability to predict what a Bluetooth piconet  11  will do in the future based on the statistic package  60  developed from analyzing the Bluetooth transmissions over a period of time. A collision probability calculator  48  receives the Bluetooth occupation probability estimation from the estimator  45  and the packet length for the packet intended to be transmitted by a node  10 . This information may be provided in the transmit request  66 . The wireless LAN node&#39;s intended transmit characteristics are expanded and compared over the next six slots and data for each slot is provided to the collision probability calculator  48 . Thus, the calculator  48  receives slot by slot data from the occupation calculator  46  and slot by slot data from the estimator  45 . 
         [0041]    The output of the calculator  48  is provided to a threshold comparator  56 . The comparator  56  compares the transmit request  66  to the estimated Bluetooth transmission probability indicated at  60  and determines whether to initiate a holdoff  68 . The holdoff  68  moves the proposed transmission to a period of time of acceptably low collision probabilities. 
         [0042]    A hypothetical local area network, shown in  FIG. 6 , may include a node or transceiver  72 , a node or transceiver  80  and a node or transceiver  76 . In addition, a Bluetooth/LAN transceiver or access point  74  may also be included in the network. An access point is a bridge connected on one side of one network and on the other side to another network for forwarding packets between the two networks. In addition to the wireless local area network including transceivers  72 ,  74 ,  76  and  80 , a plurality of Bluetooth piconets  70 ,  78  and  82  may be proximate to one or more of the transceivers  72  through  80 . For example, the piconet  70  may have a range  70   a  which encompasses the transceiver  72 . Likewise, the piconet  78  may have a range  78   a  that encompasses the access point  74  and the piconet  82  may have a range  82   a  that encompasses the transceiver  76 . 
         [0043]    In this example, the Bluetooth piconets  70 ,  78  and  82  may operate in the same frequency band as the wireless LAN transceivers  72 ,  74  and  76 . Thus, the possibility of interference exists between a locally proximate Bluetooth piconet such as the piconet  70  and the transceiver  72 . In contrast, the transceiver  80 , which is not proximate to any of the Bluetooth piconets, may not have any Bluetooth interference problems. 
         [0044]    The access point  74  may transmit data to the transceiver  72  as indicated in  84 . However, the access point  74  may be far enough away from the Bluetooth piconet  70  that the access point  74  may have no way to directly determine that its transmission may be interfered with by the Bluetooth piconet  70 . 
         [0045]    Instead, each transceiver  72 ,  74 ,  76  and  80  of the wireless LAN network does its own local evaluation of any potential interferers. Thus, the transceiver  72  analyzes the transmission from the Bluetooth piconet  70  within the range  70 a and prepares a statistics package. The statistics package developed by the transceiver  72  and particularly by its unit  18 , may then be transmitted to the access point  74 . In one embodiment of the present invention, a relatively compact transmission such as the 32-bit word illustrated in  FIG. 3 , may be utilized. 
         [0046]    Similarly, each node, such as the transceivers  72 ,  74 ,  76  and  80 , transmits its statistics package information to all the other nodes in the wireless LAN network. As a result, any node wishing to transmit data to any other node can then take into account the local interference conditions with respect to the intended receiving station. 
         [0047]    A transmitter, such as the access point  74 , then uses a statistics package that it received from the transceiver  72  to time its transmission  84  to the transceiver  72 . This is done through the collision probability estimator  44  local to the access point  74 . More particularly, the statistics package may be generated by a unit  18  in the transceiver  72  and transmitted to all of the other network nodes. The collision probability estimator  44  in the access point  74  may use the statistics package from the transceiver  72  to make collision avoidance decisions and to control the timing of the transmission of data from the access point  74  to the transceiver  72 . 
         [0048]    Referring back to  FIG. 1 , the MAC  14  may include a processor  110  and a storage  112  that stores interference mitigation software  90 , in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The software  90  may control the operation of the mitigation module  16  itself including the unit  18  and the estimator  44 . In some embodiments of the present invention, that control may be implemented in software and in other embodiments, the control may be implemented in firmware or hardware. Similarly, the unit  18  and estimator  44  are illustrated as being implemented in hardware but in other embodiments, they may be implemented in software. 
         [0049]    Referring to  FIG. 7 , the interference mitigation software  90  begins by preparing a local statistics package for any local Bluetooth piconet as indicated in block  92 . The statistics package is prepared in the unit  18 . A check at diamond  94  determines whether an open channel exists. If an open channel exists, wherein no ongoing transmissions or receptions are occurring in a particular node  10 , that node may transmit its local statistics package to all the other nodes in a wireless LAN network as indicated in block  96 . 
         [0050]    When the transmission request is received at a node  10 , as indicated in diamond  98 , a statistics package that was previously received from the intended target receiver is acquired as indicated in block  100 . The collision avoidance calculation is implemented as indicated in block  102  using the estimator  44  for example. 
         [0051]    A check at diamond  104  determines whether the collision probability threshold probability is exceeded. If so, the transmission is heldoff as indicated in block  106 . When the transmission threshold is no longer exceeded, as determined in diamond  104 , the data is transmitted as indicated in  108 . 
         [0052]    While the present invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of this present invention.

Technology Classification (CPC): 7