Patent Abstract:
The present invention relates to audio signal processing such as equalisation and spatial enhancement functions. The present invention provides an audio signal processing circuit arrangement for two audio channels, and which combines spatial enhancement or acoustic mixing (crosstalk) cancelling with graphic equalisation functions. This is achieved with a circuit structure having a reduced filter count compared with known cascaded circuits dedicated to each function. The circuit structure processes the sum and difference signals through separate filters and then recombines them to recover the separate channels (adding and subtracting respectively).

Full Description:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION  
       [0001]     The present invention relates to audio signal processing such as equalisation and spatial enhancement functions, and is particularly but not exclusively concerned with digital signal processing of digital audio signals.  
       BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
       [0002]     Two common effects for improving the perceived quality of stereo audio are stereo enhancement and frequency-response equalisation.  
         [0003]     Spatial or stereo enhancement effects work by cancelling crosstalk components that occur due to acoustic mixing of left and right signals between the loudspeaker and the ear. The result is to give an impression of increased stereo separation between channels.  FIG. 1  shows how the listener&#39;s left ear (Le) receives signals intended for the right ear via path B, i.e. Le=A.Lo+B.Ro where Lo and Ro are the output signals from the left and right speakers and A and B are the acoustic transfer functions for paths A and B, and similarly, the right ear receives signals intended for the left ear.  
         [0004]     Two circuits are commonly used for cancelling these crosstalk components.  FIG. 2   a  shows the classical crosstalk canceller. This comprises two stereo enhancement filters C for filtering the left and right channels, and two adders A L  and A R . Li and Ri are audio signals received from left and right signal sources. Adder A L  subtracts the right channel input Ri, after filtering, from the left channel input Li to give a left channel output Lo. Adder A R  provides a corresponding function to provide the right channel output Ro. It can be shown that if the filter C has the transfer function B/A, the crosstalk components cancel perfectly.  
               Lo   =       ⁢     Li   -     C   ·   Ri         ,       and   ⁢           ⁢   Ro     =     Ri   -     C   ·   Li                     Le   =       ⁢       A   ·     (     Li   -     C   ·   Ri       )       +     B   ·     (     Ri   -     C   ·   Li       )                     =       ⁢       A   ·   Li     -     B   ·   Ri     +     B   ·   Ri     -     Li   ·       B   2     /   A                     =       ⁢     A   ·   Li   ·     (     1   -       B   2     /     A   2         )                 
 
         [0005]     In general, filter C is designed with a simple low-pass function to mimic the diffraction effect of the listener&#39;s head in path B, based on the assumption that path A has little filtering effect. Filter C may also be designed as a bandpass function to prevent cancellation of bass signals which are recorded equally in left and right channels.  
         [0006]     A second known circuit is shown in  FIG. 2   b . Here the difference between the left input Li and right input Ri channels is filtered (C′) and scaled (K). This processed signal is then added (A L ) to the left input signal Li to produce the left output signal Lo, and is subtracted (A R ) from the right input signal Ri to produce the right output signal Ro. This modification results in similar crosstalk cancellation properties, with complete cancellation when C′=B/(A−B), giving Le=A.Li.(1+(B/A)). However it only requires a single filter, thus making implementation simpler and cheaper. The circuit also has a “3D-gain” controller which is implemented by a scaling unit having variable gain K, which allows the extent of the stereo enhancement or acoustic crosstalk cancellation effect to be adjusted.  
         [0007]     Although stereo enhancement filters (C or C′) are usually designed with a bandpass or lowpass function, the effect can be crude and produces an unnatural sounding stereo image. This is due to the gross approximation that the transfer function B/A is lowpass. More interesting or subtle effects can be produced by using a more flexible filter function. For example, it is useful to be able to modify these filters to compensate for differences in loudspeaker placement and the shape of the listener&#39;s head, so as to more closely match the response of function B/A. In practice this will be enabled by user controlled inputs to control the filter characteristics and/or the extent of the stereo enhancement effect (K).  
         [0008]     Another common effect is Frequency Response Equalisation, which is used to modify the frequency characteristics of an audio signal to either compensate for the frequency response of the listening environment, or to adjust the sound to suit the listener&#39;s preference. Typically a graphic equaliser function is used provide boost or cut over a number of different audio frequency bands.  
         [0009]     When implementing both a spatial enhancement effect and equalisation effects, three filters are required, one (C LR  and C ER ) for each channel in the equaliser, and one in the spatial enhancer (C′). Typically these functional blocks are simply cascaded together, as illustrated by the additional filters C EL  and C ER  shown in dashed outline in  FIG. 3 . Normally C EL  and C ER  will be the same transfer function C E , say.  
         [0010]     In applications where implementation cost needs to be kept to an absolute minimum, the hardware cost of implementing these filters can be prohibitive. For portable battery-powered equipment (generally driving headphones, but similar features are still desirable), power consumption is also an important consideration. If the filters are implemented on an ALU (Arithmetic Logic Unit) core, the number of multiply cycles are at a premium, and so it is advantageous to minimise the number (or complexity) of the filters in order to avoid increasing the clock frequency of the ALU. Higher clock frequencies demand higher power consumption, and possibly a larger chip area, or at worst having to add an extra ALU to the system.  
         [0011]     It is thus desirable to be able to provide both spatial enhancement and frequency response equalisation, but with reduced hardware cost and power consumption.  
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
       [0012]     In general terms in one aspect the present invention provides an audio signal processing circuit arrangement for two audio channels, and which combines spatial enhancement or acoustic mixing (crosstalk) cancelling with equalisation functions. The circuit structure processes the sum and difference signals through separate filters and then recombines them to recover the separate channels (adding and subtracting respectively).  
         [0013]     Such an arrangement provides a number of advantages including reduced hardware cost and complexity, which is especially important in low cost consumer electronics. This is achieved in an embodiment with a circuit structure having a reduced filter count compared with known cascaded circuits dedicated to each function. An additional advantage is the reduced power consumption of the arrangement due to the reduction of filter functions which are implemented as multiply and add operations on an arithmetic logic unit (ALU). Minimising the number of computations required in this way allows the clock frequency to be reduced and hence power consumption reduced. This is particularly important in portable devices such as personal MP3 players.  
         [0014]     A further or alternative advantage is that the filter headroom requirements are reduced. This compares with simply cascading the spatial enhancement effect and equaliser. If a large L−R difference signal occurs, it becomes difficult to manage filter headroom requirements. This is because it is possible that the user will select a high gain for both blocks, causing premature signal overload at large transient overshoots or at frequencies where both filters have high gain, or even where the response of the first block shows peaks and the second is adjusted to give corresponding attenuation to avoid overload at the system output, still giving signal overload at the intermediate node. Such an overload can only be avoided by increasing the width of the digital word, again with penalties in hardware cost and power consumption. Conversely, the first filter may have a large dip in its response, which is then compensated for by a peaking in the second filter response, resulting in an amplification of the quantisation noise or numerical rounding errors from the first filter, which would require more bits at the LSB end of the digital word, to maintain a desired signal-to-noise ratio. This potential headroom problem is not an issue in the embodiments because there is no cascading of filters and so no need for the “last” filter(s) to be capable of handling an otherwise large input dynamic range.  
         [0015]     In an embodiment the filtered sum and difference signals are added to the separate input signals in order to provide stereo enhancement and/or equalisation functions. With appropriate scaling of the filtered difference and sum signals and of the input signals, the mix of these two effects can be controlled by a user.  
         [0016]     In particular in one aspect there is provided a signal processing circuit for audio signals according to claim  1 .  
         [0017]     There is also provided a method of processing audio signals according to claim  12 .  
         [0018]     Whilst the circuit and method are well suited to digital signal processing such as implementing cross-talk cancellation and equalisation functions in digital audio signals, they are also applicable to analogue implementation and analogue signal processing. 
     
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0019]     Embodiments will now be described with reference to the attached drawings, by way of example only and without intending to be limiting, in which:  
         [0020]      FIG. 1  illustrates acoustic crosstalk;  
         [0021]      FIG. 2   a  illustrates a circuit for cancelling acoustic crosstalk;  
         [0022]      FIG. 2   b  illustrates another circuit for cancelling acoustic crosstalk;  
         [0023]      FIG. 3  illustrates another circuit for cancelling acoustic crosstalk, as well as providing a graphic equalisation function;  
         [0024]      FIG. 4  is a schematic of a circuit arrangement according to an embodiment;  
         [0025]      FIG. 5  is a schematic of a circuit arrangement according to another embodiment;  
         [0026]      FIG. 6  is a schematic of a circuit arrangement according to another embodiment; and  
         [0027]      FIG. 7  is a schematic of a circuit arrangement according to another embodiment.  
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION  
       [0028]      FIG. 4  shows an equaliser arrangement according to an embodiment. The equaliser has two inputs for receiving a left channel signal Li and a right channel signal Ri. The two input signal paths Li and Ri are coupled to an adder A S  which sums the input signals to provide a sum signal (Li+Ri). These are then applied to a first or sum filter C 1 , and then to a scaling unit S 1  which has a gain value of KA. When KA=0.5 it halves the amplitude of the signal output from the first filter C 1 . The two input paths Li and Ri are also coupled to a subtractor AD which provides a difference signal (Li−Ri) to a second filter C 2 . The output of the second filter C 2  is coupled to a second scaling unit S 2  also having a gain of KA, say 0.5. A second adder A L  adds the processed difference signal from S 2  (KA.C 2 .(Li−Ri)) to the processed sum signal from S 1  (KA.C 1 .(Li+Ri)) to provide a left channel output signal Lo. A second subtractor A R  subtracts the processed difference signal from S 2  from the processed sum signal from S 1  to provide a right channel output signal Ro.  
         [0029]     Thus this “differential” equaliser EQ architecture processes the sum (L+R) and difference (L−R) signals separately.  
         [0030]     If the filters C 1  and C 2  are identical (equal to C E  say as described in relation to  FIG. 3 ) and KA=0.5, when the outputs are recombined the overall result is the same as processing each channel separately through transfer function C E , as is shown below: 
 
 Lo=C 1( Li+Ri )/2+ C 2( Li−Ri )/2= C   E ( Li+Ri )/2+ C   E ( Li−Ri )/2= C   E   .Li  
 
 Ro=C 1( Li+Ri )/2− C 2( Li−Ri )/2= C   E ( Li+Ri )/2− C   E ( Li−Ri )/2= C   E .Ri 
 
         [0031]     This is equivalent to processing the signals through the circuit of  FIG. 2 . If KA is decreased to less than 0.5, both outputs scale accordingly, by a factor of KA/0.5, down to zero as KA approaches zero.  
         [0032]     If the filter characteristic C 1  is equal to C E , and C 2  is equal to the product of C E  and (1+2.K.C′), when the outputs are recombined the overall result is the same as processing each channel separately through the circuit of  FIG. 3 , as is shown below:  
             Lo   =       ⁢         C1   ⁡     (     Li   +   Ri     )       /   2     +       C2   ⁡     (     Li   -   Ri     )       /   2                   =       ⁢           C   E     ⁡     (     Li   +   Ri     )       /   2     +         C   E     ·     (     1   +     2   ⁢     K   ·     C   ′           )       ⁢       (     Li   -   Ri     )     /   2                     =       ⁢       C   E     ·     (     Li   +     K   ·     C   ′     ·     (     Li   -   Ri     )         )                   Ro   =       ⁢         C1   ⁡     (     Li   +   Ri     )       /   2     -       C2   ⁡     (     Li   -   Ri     )       /   2                   =       ⁢           C   E     ⁡     (     Li   +   Ri     )       /   2     -       C   E     ·     (     1   +     2   ⁢     K   ·         C   ′     ⁡     (     Li   -   Ri     )       /   2                             =       ⁢       C   E     ·     (     Ri   -     K   ·     C   ′     ·     (     Li   -   Ri     )         )                 
 
         [0033]     Again, since both main signal paths are scaled by KA, as KA is decreased to less than 0.5, both outputs scale accordingly, by a factor of KA/0.5, down to zero as KA approaches zero.  
         [0034]      FIG. 5  shows the circuit of  FIG. 2   b  modified to incorporate additional scaling elements S 3 , S 4  which scale all outputs by a factor K 1  and S 5 , which scales by the product of K 1  and K. If the filter C 2  has the same transfer function C′ as the filter in  FIG. 2   b , then the outputs Lo and Ro are the same as those from the circuit of  FIG. 2   b , except scaled by K 1 . Thus when K 1 =1 they are unscaled, and attenuated to zero when K 1 =0. Except for this additional scaling, this circuit is functionally equivalent to  FIG. 2   b , and provides a variable amount of “3D” spatial enhancement controlled by K.  
         [0035]      FIG. 6  shows a combined acoustic crosstalk canceller and equaliser circuit architecture according to a preferred embodiment. This can be seen to be a superposition of  FIGS. 4 and 5 , with the same components having the same references. The scaling factors KA of scalers S 1  and S 2  are now set to be (1−K 1 )/2.  
         [0036]     The combined crosstalk canceller and equaliser of  FIG. 6  is similar to  FIG. 4  and has two inputs, for receiving a left channel signal Li and a right channel signal Ri. The two input signal paths Li and Ri are coupled to an adder A S  which sums the input signals to provide a sum signal (Li+Ri). These are then applied to a first or sum filter C 1 , and then to a scaling unit S 1  which has a gain value of (1−K 1 )/2, where 0&lt;=K 1 &lt;=1. The two input paths Li and Ri are also coupled to a subtractor A D  which provides a difference signal (Li−Ri) to a second filter C 2 . The output of the second filter C 2  is coupled to a second scaling unit S 2  also having a gain of (1−K 1 )/2.  
         [0037]     A second adder A L  adds the processed difference signal from S 2  (((1−K 1 )/2).C 2 .(Li−Ri)) to the processed sum signal from S 1  (((1−K 1 )/2).C 1 .(Li+Ri)). A further signal path from the input signal Li to the second adder A L  incorporates another scaling unit S 3  having a gain of K 1 . The scaled input signal K 1 .Li is added to the processed sum and difference signals by the second adder A L  to provide a left channel output signal Lo. A second subtractor A R  subtracts the processed difference signal from S 2  from the processed sum signal from S 1 . A further signal path from the input signal Ri to the second subtractor A R  incorporates another scaling unit S 4  having a gain of K 1 . The scaled input signal K 1 .Ri is added to the processed sum and difference signals by the second subtractor A R  to provide a right channel output signal Ro.  
         [0038]     A further scaling unit S 5  is coupled between the output from the second filter C 2  to both the second adder A L  and the second subtractor A R , which in both cases add this scaled output to their other inputs to produce their respective left and right output signals Lo and Ro. The fifth scaling unit has a gain of K.K 1 , where K is a gain value equivalent to that of the scaling unit in  FIG. 3 . K is the “3D-gain” value required for a particular effect level from the circuit of  FIG. 3 .  
         [0039]     Thus, these combined functions (spatial enhancement and equalisation) can be performed using just two filter blocks C 1  and C 2 , rather than the three of a typical cascade of these functional blocks. This reduces hardware cost and complexity. It also advantageously reduces power consumption by reducing the number of filter computations required to be performed by the ALU. This is highly desirable in portable devices such as MP3 players where battery life is an important issue.  
         [0040]     As discussed above, additional signal paths are present in the circuit of  FIG. 6  compared with that of  FIG. 4  from the inputs to the output summers, each having a further scaling unit or gain block S 3  for the Li to Lo path and S 4  for the Ri to Ro path.  
         [0041]     This architecture combines the variable aspect of the “3D” crosstalk cancelling effect of  FIG. 3  or  5  with the equalisation function of  FIG. 4  (or the dashed part of  FIG. 3 ). By adjusting K 1 , the extent of the spatial enhancement and equalisation effects can be adjusted. For example when K 1 =0, there is no spatial enhancement (3D), but full equalisation (EQ), and when K 1 =1 there is no EQ but full 3D. Intermediate values of K 1  provide a mix of 3D and EQ. The 3D effect can be independently adjusted by varying K; though preferably this is fixed.  
         [0042]     In practice C 1  can equal C 2 , enabling sharing of coefficients, and hence saving coefficient memory access and capacity.  
         [0043]     As K 1  is adjusted, the filter transfers functions C 1  and C 2  can be adjusted to create the proper 3D or EQ effects as described above with respect to  FIGS. 4 and 5 . Thus for example when K 1 =0, the circuit is equivalent to that of  FIG. 4 , and C 1 =C =C E  can be used. For K 1 =1, the circuit is equivalent to  FIG. 3 , and C 2 =C′ can be used. In the later case the transfer function of filter C 1  doesn&#39;t matter. For intermediate K 1 , intermediate filter functions are set. The filter controls will typically be controlled by user input, however it is also possible to preset these depending on the user determined value of K 1 .  
         [0044]     In practice a listener will generally prefer to avoid these extremes and choose some intermediate value of K 1 , giving a hybrid between the two effects. For values of K 1  close to zero, the architecture behaves as an equaliser with some additional enhancement to the spatial properties of the sound due a degree of crosstalk cancellation. For values of K 1  close to 1, the spatial effect is very pronounced, but the frequency response equalisation is more subtle.  
         [0045]     Whilst not shown in the drawings, the skilled person will appreciate how to interface control signals for varying K 1  and the filter functions C 1  and C 2  with a user interface in order to let a user control these effects. Also, whilst the embodiments have been described where C 1 =C 2 , it is equally possible that different equalisation functions could be applied to the left and right channels.  
         [0046]      FIG. 7  shows a simplified version of the circuit of  FIG. 6  in which two of the scaling units in  FIG. 6  (K.K 1  and S 2 ) are replaced with a single gain block S 2 ′ having a value of K 3 / 2 , where K 3 =1−K 1 +2K.K 1 .  
         [0047]     The transfer functions for the left and right paths (where C=C 1 =C 2 ) are equivalent to those of  FIG. 6  and are as follows: 
 
 Lo=C (1− K 1)( Li+Ri )/2+ C.K 3( Li−Ri )/2+ K 1. Li  
 
 Ro=C (1− K 1)( Li+Ri )/2− C.K 3( Li−Ri )/2+ K 1. Ri  
 
         [0048]     Equivalently, 
 
 Lo= ( C (1− K 1)+ K 1) Li+C.K.K 1( Li−Ri ) 
 
 Ro= ( C (1− K 1)+ K 1) Ri−C.K.K 1( Li−Ri ) 
 
         [0049]     When K 1 =0 (zero 3D effect), the overall transfer function reduces to that of the circuit of  FIG. 4 —i.e. this is the same as separately filtering L and R signals with equaliser function C, to give Lo=C.Li and Ro=C.Ri.  
         [0050]     When K 1 =1, 
 
 Lo=Li+C.K ( Li−Ri ) 
 
 Ro=Ri−C.K ( Li−Ri ) 
 
 so the architecture implements the stereo enhancement function of  FIG. 3 , with the 3D-gain set by K, and the added difference signal filtered by C. 
 
         [0051]     The embodiments provide a number of advantages, for example they allow a more efficient implementation to be used (2 filters are used instead of 3), whilst allowing the user control over both Frequency Response Equalisation and Spatial Enhancement (or acoustic crosstalk cancellation). Additionally, the signal headroom requirements are easier to manage, avoiding the need for wider digital words and the extra hardware costs and power required to process them. This is because the problem of cascading two high gain stages (separate spatial enhancement and equalisation stages) together is avoided.  
         [0052]     Whilst the embodiments have been described with respect to digital signal processing, it is equally possible to implement them in other technologies, for example as analogue circuits using op amps with similar advantages in terms of reduced circuit complexity, cost, and power and avoidance of overload or noise peaking under possible filter response selections.  
         [0053]     The circuits of the embodiments may be implemented as integrated circuits or chips, and these may be incorporated into various items of audio equipment such as portable MP3 players, computer sound cards, games machines, audio visual equipment such as TV&#39;s, stand alone amplifiers or speakers, as well as other digitally based hi-fi sound equipment, digital still and video cameras.  
         [0054]     The skilled person will recognise that the above-described apparatus and methods may be embodied as processor control code, for example on a carrier medium such as a disk, CD- or DVD-ROM, programmed memory such as read only memory (Firmware), or on a data carrier such as an optical or electrical signal carrier. For many applications embodiments of the invention will be implemented on a DSP (Digital Signal Processor), ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit) or FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array). Thus the code may comprise conventional programme code or microcode or, for example code for setting up or controlling an ASIC or FPGA. The code may also comprise code for dynamically configuring re-configurable apparatus such as re-programmable logic gate arrays. Similarly the code may comprise code for a hardware description language such as Verilog™ or VHDL (Very high speed integrated circuit Hardware Description Language). As the skilled person will appreciate, the code may be distributed between a plurality of coupled components in communication with one another. Where appropriate, the embodiments may also be implemented using code running on a field-(re)programmable analogue array or similar device in order to configure analogue hardware.  
         [0055]     The skilled person will also appreciate that the various embodiments and specific features described with respect to them could be freely combined with the other embodiments or their specifically described features in general accordance with the above teaching. The skilled person will also recognise that various alterations and modifications can be made to specific examples described without departing from the scope of the appended claims.

Technology Classification (CPC): 7