Patent Abstract:
In general, a system and method for analyzing wireless communication data for determining an optimal wireless communication service plans based on spectrum licenses is disclosed. A transceiver is configured to receive billing information associated with a subscriber of a telecommunications service under a current rate plan. A storage unit stores the billing information. A processor processes the subscriber related billing information to produce organized data in a calling profile record for each telecommunication service being used by the subscriber. The processor then determines the cost of the current rate plan and the cost of at least one other rate plan. The processor then determines at least one proposed rate plan that would save the subscriber telecommunication costs relative to the current rate plan. A report of at least one proposed rate plan is then produced and provided to the subscriber, which enables selection of a best telecommunication service provider.

Full Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60/230,846, filed on Sep. 7, 2000, and entitled “System and Method for Analyzing Wireless Communications Records and for Determining Optimal Wireles Communication Service Plans,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety into the present disclosure. 
     This application is related to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/758,816, filed on Jan. 11, 2001, and entitled “System and Method for Analyzing Wireless Communication Records and for Determining Wireless Communication Service Plans,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety into the present disclosure. 
     This application is also related to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/758,815, filed on Jan. 11, 2001, and entitled “System and Method for Analyzing Wireless Communication Data,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety into the present disclosure. 
     This application is also related to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/758,818, filed on Jan. 11, 2001, and entitled “System and Method for Determining Optimal Wireless Communication Service Plans,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety into the present disclosure. 
     This application is also related to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/758,824, filed on Jan. 11, 2001, and entitled “System and Method for Determining Optimal Wireless Communication Service Plans Based on Historical Projection Analysis,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety into the present disclosure. 
    
    
     FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention is generally related to wireless telecommunication, and, more particularly, is related to a system and method for analyzing wireless communication data, via use of spectrum licenses, to enable the determination of an optimal wireless communication service plan. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     Because immediate access to information has become a necessity in virtually all fields of endeavor, including business, finance and science, communication system usage, particularly for wireless communication systems, is increasing at a substantial rate. Along with the growth in communication use has come a proliferation of wireless communication service providers. As a result, a variety of wireless communication service alternatives have become available to consumers and businesses alike. 
     Subscribers to communication services, particularly wireless communication services, and the businesses that may employ them, who are dissatisfied with the quality of service or the value of the service provided by a particular provider, may terminate their current service and subscribe to a different service. Unfortunately, due to the vast number of communication service providers available, it is difficult to determine an optimal service plan, as well as optional service packages. In addition, due to the competitive nature of the wireless communication field, the cost and options made available with service plans frequently change, adding to the difficulty of finding the most optimal service plan available at a specific time. 
     Thus, a heretofore unaddressed need exists in the industry to address the aforementioned deficiencies and inadequacies. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     In light of the foregoing, the invention is a system and method for determining optimal wireless communication service plans based on spectrum licenses. 
     Generally, describing the structure of the system, the system uses at least one transceiver that is configured to receive billing information associated with a subscriber of a telecommunications service under a current rate plan that is stored in a storage unit. A processor is also used by the system which is configured to: process the subscriber related billing information to produce organized data in a calling profile record for each telecommunication service being used by the subscriber; determine cost of the current rate plan and the cost of at least one other rate plan, wherein determination of the cost of the current rate plan comprises determining a phone number from where a call is made, determining a zip code associated with the phone number, determining a license code associated with the zip code, and determining a charge for the call associated with the license code; determine at least one proposed rate plan that would save the subscriber telecommunication costs relative to the current rate plan; and, produce a report of the at least one proposed rate plan to enable selection of a best telecommunication service provider and a best rate plan. 
     The present invention can also be viewed as providing a method for analyzing wireless communication records and for determining optimal wireless communication service plans. In this regard, the method can be broadly summarized by the following steps: receiving billing information associated with a subscriber of a telecommunication service under a current rate plan; processing the subscriber related billing information to produce organized data in a calling profile record for each telecommunication service being used by the subscriber; determining cost of the current rate plan by, determining a phone number from where a call is made, determining a zip code associated with the phone number, determining a license code associated with the zip code, and determining a charge for the call associated with the license code; determining cost of at least one other rate plan; and, determining at least one proposed rate plan from the at least one other rate plan of at least one telecommunication service provider that would save the subscriber telecommunication costs relative to the current rate plan. 
     The invention has numerous advantages, a few of which are delineated hereafter as examples. Note that the embodiments of the invention, which are described herein, possess one or more, but not necessarily all, of the advantages set out hereafter. 
     One advantage of the invention is that it automatically provides a subscriber with the best telecommunication service provider and the best rate plan without necessitating unnecessary subscriber interaction. 
     Another advantage is that it improves the quality of service and the value of the telecommunication services received by a subscriber. 
     Other systems, methods, features, and advantages of the present invention will be or become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features, and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the present invention, and be protected by the accompanying claims. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     The invention can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the present invention. Moreover, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views. 
     FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a system and method for analyzing wireless communications records and advising on optimal wireless communication service plans. 
     FIG. 2A is a block diagram illustrating a more detailed view of an analyzing digital processor depicted in FIG.  1 . 
     FIG. 2B is a block diagram illustrating a more detailed view of a client digital processor depicted in FIG.  1 . 
     FIG. 3 is a flowchart that illustrates logical steps taken by the Moving Average Monthly Bill Analysis (MAMBA) system of FIG.  1 . 
     FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating a breakdown of an ad hoc profiler process according to profiles, optimator, and service plan instance processes. 
     FIG. 5 illustrates a flowchart of the major MAMBA process of FIG.  1  and its read from/write to interaction with significant data tables. 
     FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating the dataLoader (DL) architecture and process of FIG.  5 . 
     FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating the dataLoader process of FIG.  6 . 
     FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating the build profiles process of FIG. 5, which follows the dataLoader process of FIG.  7 . 
     FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating the input and output of the optimator of FIG. 5, which follows the buildProfile process of FIG.  8 . 
     FIG. 10 is a flowchart illustrating the process of creating rate plan evaluations of FIG. 5, which follows the optimator processes of FIG.  9 . 
     FIG. 11 is a flowchart illustrating the process of averaging profiles of FIG. 5, and how it is implemented. 
     FIG. 12 is a flowchart illustrating the organization and sequence of steps that make up the decidePlan process of the decision engine of FIG.  5 . 
     FIG. 13 is a graph plotting period versus weighting factor, for n=0, n=0.5, n=1, n=2, for the output data of the decidePlan process of FIG.  12 . 
     FIG. 14 is a flowchart illustrating the build profiles process of FIG.  8 . 
     FIG. 15 is a flowchart illustrating the getClientId process of FIG.  14 . 
     FIG. 16 is a flowchart illustrating the getCorpZip process of FIG.  14 . 
     FIG. 17 is a flowchart illustrating the getNumbersByClient process of FIG.  14 . 
     FIG. 18 is a flowchart illustrating the getZipFromPhone process of FIG.  14 . 
     FIG. 19 is a flowchart illustrating the getType process of FIG.  14 . 
     FIG. 20 is a flowchart illustrating the getLataAndState process of FIG.  19 . 
     FIG. 21 is a flowchart illustrating the getWhen process of FIG.  14 . 
     FIG. 22 is a flowchart illustrating the getWhere process of FIG.  14 . 
     FIG. 23 is a flowchart illustrating the getZipFromCityState process of FIG.  22 . 
     FIG. 24 is a flowchart illustrating the getZipCodes process of FIG.  14 . 
     FIG. 25 is a flowchart illustrating the buildProfilesDic process of FIG.  14 . 
     FIG. 26 is a flowchart illustrating the addProfileRecord process of FIG.  14 . 
     FIG. 27 is a flowchart illustrating the runProfiler process of the optimator of FIG.  5 . 
     FIG. 28 is a flowchart illustrating the doEval process of FIG.  27 . 
     FIG. 29 is a flowchart illustrating the getUserProfile process of FIG.  28 . 
     FIG. 30 is a flowchart illustrating the getProfile process of FIG.  29 . 
     FIG. 31 is a flowchart illustrating the findpackages process of FIG.  28 . 
     FIG. 32 is a flowchart illustrating the getPackagesByZip process of FIG.  31 . 
     FIG. 33 is a flowchart illustrating the selectCoveredZIPS process of FIG.  32 . 
     FIGS. 34A and 34B are flowcharts illustrating the calcCost process of FIG.  28 . 
     FIGS. 35A and 35B are a continuation of the calcCost process of FIG.  34 . 
     FIG. 36 is a flowchart illustrating the getServicePlanByID process of FIG.  34 . 
     FIG. 37 is a flowchart illustrating the createEvaluation process of FIG.  28 . 
     FIG. 38 is a flowchart illustrating the putEvaluation process of FIG.  29 . 
     FIG. 39 is a flowchart illustrating the avgProfilesByClient process of FIG.  11 . 
     FIG. 40 is a flowchart illustrating the avgProfilesByAccounts process of FIG.  39 . 
     FIG. 41 is a flowchart illustrating the getProfileRecords process of FIG.  40 . 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT 
     The moving average monthly bill analysis (MAMBA) system  100 , as is structurally depicted in FIGS. 1,  2 A, and  2 B can be implemented in software, hardware, or a combination thereof. In the preferred embodiment, as illustrated by way of example in FIG. 2A, the MAMBA system  100 , along with its associated methodology, is implemented in software or firmware, stored in computer memory of the computer system, and executed by a suitable execution system. If implemented in hardware, as in an alternative embodiment, the MAMBA system  100  can be implemented with any or a combination of the following technologies, which are well known in the art: a discrete logic circuit(s) having logic gates for implementing logic functions upon data signals, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) having appropriate combinational logic gate(s), programmable gate array(s) (PGA), field programmable gate array(s) (FPGA), etc. 
     Note that the MAMBA system  100 , when implemented in software, can be stored and transported on any computer-readable medium for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device, such as a computer-based system, processor-containing system, or other system that can fetch the instructions from the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device and execute the instructions. In the context of this document, a “computer-readable medium” can be any means that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. The computer-readable medium can be, for example but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, device, or propagation medium. More specific examples (a nonexhaustive list) of the computer-readable medium would include the following: an electrical connection (electronic) having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette (magnetic), a random access memory (RAM) (magnetic), a read-only memory (ROM) (magnetic), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory) (magnetic), an optical fiber (optical), and a portable compact disc read-only memory (CDROM) (optical). Note that the computer-readable medium could even be paper or another suitable medium upon which the program is printed, as the program can be electronically captured, via for instance optical scanning of the paper or other medium, then compiled, interpreted or otherwise processed in a suitable manner if necessary, and then stored in a computer memory. As an example, the MAMBA system  100  software may be magnetically stored and transported on a conventional portable computer diskette. 
     By way of example and illustration, FIG. 1 illustrates a typical Internet based system upon which the MAMBA system  100  of the present invention may be implemented. It should be noted that while the present disclosure provides implementation of the MAMBA system  100  within an Internet based system, the MAMBA system  100  need not be provided via use of the Internet. Instead, one of reasonable skill in the art will appreciate that the MAMBA system  100  may be implemented within other mediums, such as, for example, but not limited to, a local area network (LAN), or wide area network (WAN). 
     Alternatively, instead of implementing the MAMBA system  100  via use of the Internet, the MAMBA system  100  may also be implemented via use of a first transmitting and receiving device such as, but not limited to, a modem located at a customer premise, which is in communication with a second transmitting and receiving device such as, but not limited to, a modem located at a central office. In accordance with such an embodiment, personal computers may be located at the customer premise and the central office having logic provided therein to perform functions in accordance with the MAMBA system  100 . 
     Referring to FIG. 1, a plurality of networks  21   a ,  21   b  are shown wherein each network  21  includes multiple digital processors  33 ,  35 ,  37 . Digital processors  33 ,  35 ,  37  within each network  21  may include, but are not limited to, personal computers, mini computers, laptops, and the like. Each digital processor  33 ,  35 ,  37  is typically coupled to a host processor or server  31   a ,  31   b  for communication among processors  33 ,  35 ,  37  within the specific corresponding network  21 . 
     The host processor, or server,  31  is coupled to a communication line  41  that interconnects or links the networks  21   a ,  21   b  to each other, thereby forming an Internet. As such, each of the networks  21   a ,  21   b  are coupled along the communication line  41  to enable access from a digital processor  33   a ,  35   a ,  37   a  of one network  21   a  to a digital processor  33   b ,  35   b ,  37   b  of another network  21   b.    
     A client server  51  is linked to the communication line  41 , thus providing a client with access to the Internet via a client digital processor  53 , as further described hereinbelow. In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention, the software for implementation of the MAMBA system  100  is provided by a software program that is operated and located on an analyzing digital processor  71 , and connected through an analyzing server  61 , to the communication line  41  for communication among the various networks  21   a ,  21   b  and/or digital processors  33 ,  35 ,  37  and the client connected to the Internet via the client server  51 . 
     It should be noted that the number of client servers, client digital processors, analyzing digital processors, and analyzing servers may differ in accordance with the number of clients provided for by the present MAMBA system  100 . As an example, if five separately located clients were utilizing the MAMBA system  100 , five separate client digital processors may be connected to a single client server, or five separate client servers. 
     In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention, the client digital processor  53  may be any device, such as, but not limited to, a personal computer, laptop, workstation, or mainframe computer. Further, the networks used by the MAMBA system  100  are preferably secure and encrypted for purposes of ensuring the confidentiality of information transmitted within and between the networks  21   a ,  21   b.    
     The analyzing digital processor  71 , further depicted in FIG. 2A, is designed to analyze the wireless communication data, received either from the wireless communication provider, the client, or a third party in order to determine the optimal wireless communication service plans. As shown by FIG. 2A, the analyzing digital processor  71  includes logic to implement the functions of the MAMBA system  100 , hereinafter referred to as the MAMBA software  21 , that determines the optimal service plan stored within a computer memory  73 . 
     Several embodiments of the analyzing digital processor  71  are possible. The preferred embodiment of analyzing digital processor  71  of FIG. 2A includes one or more central processing units (CPUs)  75  that communicate with, and drive, other elements within the analyzing digital processor  71  via a local interface  77 , which can include one or more buses. A local database  74  may be located within the analyzing digital processor  71 . It should be noted that the database  74  may also be located remote from the analyzing digital processor  71 . Furthermore, an input device  79 , for example, but not limited to, a keyboard or a mouse, can be used to input data from a user of the analyzing digital processor  71 . An output device  81 , for example, but not limited to, a screen display or a printer, can be used to output data to the user. A network interface  83  can be connected to the Internet to transfer data to and from the analyzing digital processor  71 . 
     Referring to FIG. 2B, the client digital processor  53  of FIG. 1 is further illustrated. Several embodiments of client digital processor  53  are possible. In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention, the client digital processor  53  includes one or more CPUs  57  that communicate with, and drive, other elements within the client digital processor  53  via a local interface  59 , which can include one or more buses. A local database  56  may be located within the client digital processor  53 . It should be noted that the database  56  may also be located remote from the client digital processor  53 . The client digital processor  53  also includes a memory  55  that houses software to provide a browser  16 . Furthermore, an input device  61 , for example, a keyboard or a mouse, can be used to input data from a user of the client digital processor  53 . An output device  63 , for example, but not limited to, a screen display or a printer, can be used to output data to the user. A network interface  65  can be connected to the Internet to transfer data to and from the client digital processor  53 . 
     FIG. 3 is a flowchart that illustrates logical steps taken by the MAMBA system  100 . Any process descriptions or blocks in flow charts illustrated or described in this document should be understood as representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process, and alternate implementations are included within the scope of the preferred embodiment of the present invention in which functions may be executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those reasonably skilled in the art of the present invention. 
     As shown by block  120 , data regarding a given cellular account, subscriber, or group of subscribers if the service is provided for a corporate customer, is provided by a carrier. As shown by block  130 , the data is loaded into the analyzing digital processor database  74  by a dataloader process  320  (shown in FIG. 5 below). The loaded data is then analyzed. Analysis of the loaded data includes, but is not limited to, the steps of: creating a calling profile (block  140 ) for each billing period by running a buildProfile process (explained in detail below, with reference to FIG.  5 ); identifying optimal service plan options for each profile period (block  150 ); and making recommendations as to the best service plan and options (block  160 ), wherein service plan options are across multiple profile periods, by running a decidePlan process (FIG. 5 400 ). The results are then rendered to a user (block  170 ). In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention, the MAMBA system  100  then repeats the logical steps beginning with block  130  in accordance with a predefined periodic basis (block  180 ). The logical steps taken by the MAMBA system  100  are further explained hereinbelow. 
     The MAMBA system  100  can be offered on an application service provider (ASP) basis to telecommunication personnel at the customer premise, or to purchasing or other appropriate managers or administrators of wireless services at corporations, government agencies and/or similar organizations as a “cost assurance” tool. The MAMBA system  100  assures that all of the wireless accounts or subscribers under the management or control of administrators are on the best possible service plan, given their specific usage profile trends, and therefore minimizes overall expenditures for wireless services by the enterprise. 
     The MAMBA system  100  is an extension of the existing “one user at a time” Hypertext Markup Language (HTML)-based profiler application, which takes as input from an individual account or subscriber, via an HTML or Web-based interface, an interactively constructed user-defined profile, i.e., how many minutes of airtime a user may consume according to the three “W&#39;s” that, combined, bound the mobile calling environment: “When” (peak, off-peak, or weekend), “What” (local or toll), and from “Where” (home market or non-home market) the call is made. This calling profile, entered via the profiler HTML page, is then provided as input to an analysis component labeled an “optimator,” which provides as output the best set of possible service plans, including optional packages, promotions, etc., based upon the entered calling profile. The results are presented to the user in the same HTML/Web-based format. 
     Several embodiments of a profiler application  200  are possible. By way of example, the flow of logic comprising one possible embodiment of the profiler application  200  is shown in FIG.  4 . The logic is represented in flow charts that interrelate. In the profiler application  200  of FIG. 4, an inc_plan_loading.asp function  205  collects a user&#39;s usage profile information via a user interface, such as, but not limited to, an HTML-based input page/screen. The usage profile preferably comprises the following: the expected quantity of wireless usage to be utilized during a given billing period (usually, but not exclusively, a one month period); how the expected usage will be distributed according to time-of-day and day-of-week; how the usage was expected to be distributed by local versus toll calling; and the expected distribution according to the location where calls are made or received. A dbAccount putProfile function  215 , which is connected to a bus_Account putProfile function  210 , then writes this profile information to the analysis digital processor database  74 . 
     The bus_Account putProfile function  210  is connected to an optimator doEval function  250  and to service plan instances  260 ,  270  via the inc_plan_loading.asp function  205 , which presents the usage profile information stored via the dbAccount putProfile function  215  to the optimator doEval function  250 . 
     The optimator doEval function  250  then presents a list of user-provided ZIP codes, symbolic of where the user can purchase service (at least their home zip code and possibly one or more zip codes of locations for the user&#39;s place of employment) from the user profile, to an optimator findPackages function  225 . The optimator findPackages function  225  is, in turn, is connected to an SPPackage getPackagesByZIP function  220  which determines which wireless service plan packages are offered within the user provided ZIP codes. The SPPackage getPackagesByZIP function  220  then presents these wireless service plan packages to the optimator doEval function  250  via the optimator findPackages function  225 . The optimator doEval function  250 , in turn, presents the plan packages and the user profile information to an optimator calcCosts function  235  which then calls an SPPackage calcCost function  230  to calculate and organize, from lowest cost to highest cost, the cost of each service plan package combination for the given user usage profile. The cost information is then presented to the optimator doEval function  250  which uses an optimator createEvaluation function  245  and a dbOptimator putEvaluation function  240  to write the resulting evaluations, which represent comparison of the user usage profile to available service plans, to a database. 
     Finally, the optimator doEval function  250  utilizes a combination of an SPInstance getEvalID function  255 , an SPInstance getEval function  260 , a dbInstance getSPInstance function  265  and an SPInstance getSPInstance function  270  to present the results to the user via the inc_plan_loading.asp function  205 . 
     The MAMBA system  100  extends the ad hoc profiler application  200  into a multi-account or subscriber-automated and recurring process that provides an analysis of periodically loaded wireless service usage of a given account or subscriber, and/or group of accounts or subscribers (e.g., a set of subscribers all employed by the same company and all subscribing to the same carrier), and determines whether or not that subscriber, or group of subscribers, is on the optimal wireless service plan according to the particular subscriber&#39;s usage patterns across a variable number of service billing periods. If not, the MAMBA system  100  suggests alternative cellular service plans that better meet the users&#39; usage patterns and that reduce the overall cost of service to the account/subscriber. 
     FIG. 5 represents the functional “flow” among the major MAMBA system  100  components and their read from/write to interaction with the most significant data tables that are most directly utilized or affected by the analysis. Functionally, the MAMBA system  100  is comprised of the following five (5) processes, which further elaborate upon the flow chart of FIG.  3 : 
     1) Using the Data Loader (DL) process  320 , call detail records are imported from either the subscriber or the carrier information sources  310 , either in the form of CDs and/or diskettes provided by an end user or via direct connection with carriers through file transfer protocol (FTP) or other communication means, into usage_history  330  and call_detail tables  340 . While this step is actually not a part of the MAMBA system  100  per se, as the DL process  320  application may serve the analysis service offered, it may be a prerequisite process that should be modified in order to support the MAMBA system  100 . Depending upon the final implementation strategy for the DL process  320 , a staging table may be utilized as a subset of the total data set potentially provided by each carrier as may be used by the MAMBA system  100 . Such a staging table would allow for a minimum set of data used to populate the call_detail table  340  to be extracted. It should be noted that the DL Process  320  is further defined with reference to FIGS. 6 and 7 hereinbelow. 
     2) In accordance with the second process, the buildProfile process  350  of FIG. 5 is created from the imported call detail tables  340 . The MAMBA system  100  uses the call detail tables  340  for a given billing period to create a calling profile record  360 , within a calling profile table, for each account of a given client. The calling profile record  360  represents in a single data record the wireless service usage for the client&#39;s account, which for a single subscriber and in a single billing period could represent the sum total of the information captured by hundreds or thousands of individual calls as recorded by the wireless service provider in the form of call detail records (CDRs). 
     The calling profile record  360  assesses a subscriber&#39;s CDRs according to the following three parameters: “when calls are made/received”, according to time-of-day and day-of-week; “what kind of calls are made or received”, either local or toll; and, “where calls are made or received” which is categorized into home, corporate and/or a variable number of alternate zip codes. With reference to the “where” parameter, if the number of alternate zip codes exceeds the number available for the calling profile record, then an additional algorithm is used to map the alternate zip codes in excess of those allowed by the calling profile data record into one of the allowed alternate zip codes “buckets”. As an example, for four alternate markets, the MAMBA system  100  uses additional “bucketizing” logic to map any “where” usage information that goes beyond the four (4) alternate market buckets onto one of the four (4) markets. It should be noted that bucketizing is further defined with reference to FIG. 8 hereinbelow. 
     3) In accordance with the third process, namely the optimator process  370 , the calling profile records  360  are used by the optimator process  370 , as is further described hereinbelow. The optimator process  370  evaluates the calling profile records  360  to determine whether or not the client&#39;s current calling plan is the most cost effective for the usage represented by the calling profile  360  under analysis and recommends a variable number of cost-effective calling plans. This recommendation may take the form of a rate plan evaluation record  380  and at least one linked service plan instance record  390 . It should be noted that the optimator process  370  is further defined with reference to FIG. 9 hereinbelow. 
     4) The fourth process, namely the decide plan process, uses the decidePlan process  400  to compare the results from the optimator process  370  to the cost, based upon usage history, for the current service plan an account, or client subscriber, is using. The decidePlan process  400  then selects the best possible plan using a “historical predictor” algorithm and several related statistical filters that, together, make a decision engine. It should be noted that the decidePlan process  400  is further defined with reference to FIG. 12 hereinbelow. 
     5) In a fifth process, namely the presentResults process  410 , the MAMBA system  100  renders the recommendations from the optimator process  370  to the client and executes any actions the client wants to take as a result of those recommendations. As such, the MAMBA system  100  gathers information at different points during its processing and stores that information for use in presentation to the client in a rendition of the results  410 . It should be noted that the present results process is further described hereinbelow under the title “Presentation of Recommendations or Actions.” 
     dataLoader (DL) 
     FIG. 6 further illustrates the DL process  320  architecture and process  320 . The DL process  320  is used to import data from external data sources, such as, for example, CD-ROMs or other storing mediums, such as diskettes provided by customers, or through direct data feeds from carriers serving those customers, to populate the database  74 , preferably a Microsoft-structured query language™ (MS-SQL™) database, which is manufactured by, and made commonly available from, Microsoft Corporation, U.S.A., with the call detail and usage history information used by the MAMBA system  100 . Other suitable database packages may be used, of which MS-SQL™ is merely an example. Preferably, the DL process  320 , the results of which also support the Analysis ASP offering in addition to the MAMBA system  100 , makes use of a set of ActiveX components to load requisite data from the provided sources. These components may, for instance, support the import of data from Microsoft Access™, Dbase IV™, Microsoft Excel™ and Microsoft SQL™ databases  430 - 430 . It should be noted that other databases may be used in accordance with the present invention. 
     The DL process  320  makes use of two text files, namely, a “Map” file  440  and a “Visual Basic, Scripting Edition (VBS)™” file  450 , to flexibly define or control the configuration of the data import process. The “Map” file  440  dictates to the DL process  320  how to map incoming data fields to destination data fields. The “VBS” file  450  is used by the DL process  320  to perform any custom transformations of input data before writing it to a destination, e.g., get dow_id from day_of_week. The Map  440  and VBS files  450  are developed as part of the data conversion process undertaken whenever new input data formats are presented by a customer base or carrier relationship base. 
     The DL process  320  is used to import initial customer data as well as to import ongoing call detail data. In one implementation of the invention, each of these data loads has a “base” set of user-provided data exist in a destination database, such as, for example, the local database  74  located within the analyzing digital processor  71 , and then loads new data into the database. In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention, data shown in Table 1 hereinbelow exists in the database prior to execution of the DL process  320 . It should be noted that the following is by no means a conclusive list of data and, as such, other data may exist within the database, or less data may exist within the database. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 1 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Data Tables that Exists in Database Prior to Running the DL Process 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 ACCESSORY_ITEMS 
                 ACCESSORY_PRODUCT_LINK 
                 ACTIVITY 
               
               
                 ACTIVITY_LINK 
                 ADDRESS 
                 ADDRESS_TYPE 
               
               
                 BTA 
                 CARRIER 
                 CARRIER_ADDRESS_LINK 
               
               
                 CARRIER_CONTACT_LINK 
                 CARRIER_DBA 
                 CONTACT 
               
               
                 CONTACT_TYPE 
                 COUNTY 
                 COVERAGE_AREA_BTA_LINK 
               
               
                 COVERAGE_AREA_MRSA_LINK 
                 DB_HISTORY 
                 FCC_CELL_LICENSE 
               
               
                 FCC_PCS_LICENSE 
                 LERG_FOREIGN 
                 LERG_US 
               
               
                 MRSA 
                 MTA 
                 MTA_MRSA_LINK 
               
               
                 NATION 
                 PHONE_ITEMS 
                 PHONE_PRODUCT_LINK 
               
               
                 PRODUCT_BUNDLE_ITEMS 
                 PRODUCT_FAMILY 
                 PRODUCT_INFO_STATUS_TYPE 
               
               
                 REQUEST_STATUS 
                 REQUEST_TYPE 
                 SERVICE_PLAN 
               
               
                 SERVICE_PLAN_STATUS_TYPE 
                 SP_FEATURE 
                 SP_FEATURE_BUNDLE 
               
               
                 SP_FEATURE_BUNDLE_LINK 
                 SP_FEATURE_TYPE 
                 SP_PACKAGE 
               
               
                 SP_PACKAGE_COVERAGE_LINK 
                 SP_PACKAGE_TYPE 
                 SP_PHONE_ITEM_LINK 
               
               
                 SP_TAX 
                 STATE 
                 STATE_MTA_LINK 
               
               
                 TECHNOLOGY_TYPE 
                 USERINFO_STATUS_TYPE 
                 ZIP_CODE 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     The initial customer data load may then be loaded within the tables shown in Table 2. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 2 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Data Tables into which Customers Initially Load Data 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 ACCOUNT 
                 ACCOUNT_ADDRESS —   
                 ADDRESS 
               
               
                   
                 LINK 
               
               
                 ADDRESS 
                 CLIENT 
                 CLIENT_ADDRESS —   
               
               
                   
                   
                 LINK 
               
               
                 DEPARTMENT 
                 PHONE_ITEMS 
                 REQUEST_LOOKUP 
               
               
                 TELEPHONE 
                 USAGE_HISTORY 
                 USER 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     In accordance with one embodiment of the DL process  320 , in the ongoing call detail data load the initial customer load may be completed prior to the running of the DL process  320 . The ongoing call detail load may load data into the following tables shown in Table 3. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 3 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Data Tables into which Customers May Load Ongoing Call Detail 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 CALL_DETAIL 
                 PACKAGE_INSTANCE 
                 SERVICE_PLAN 
               
               
                 SERVICE_PLAN —   
                 SP_PACKAGE 
               
               
                 INSTANCE 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     The call_detail table shown in Table 3 contains the minimum set of information provided by the wireless providers detailing calls made which can be reduced into a single calling_profile by the buildProfile process  350 . The layout of the call_detail table is shown in Table 4. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 4 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Layout of Call_detail Table 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Field Name 
                 Data Type 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Call_detail_id 
                 Integer 
               
               
                   
                 Usage_id 
                 Integer 
               
               
                   
                 billing_period 
                 Datetime 
               
               
                   
                 mkt_cycle_end 
                 Datetime 
               
               
                   
                 invoice_number 
                 Varchar 
               
               
                   
                 billing_telephone_number 
                 Varchar 
               
               
                   
                 originating_date 
                 Datetime 
               
               
                   
                 originating_time 
                 Varchar 
               
               
                   
                 originating_city 
                 Varchar 
               
               
                   
                 originating_state 
                 Varchar 
               
               
                   
                 terminating_number 
                 Varchar 
               
               
                   
                 call_duration 
                 Decimal 
               
               
                   
                 air_charge 
                 Money 
               
               
                   
                 land_charge 
                 Money 
               
               
                   
                 Surcharge 
                 Money 
               
               
                   
                 Total 
                 Money 
               
               
                   
                 user_last_updt 
                 Varchar 
               
               
                   
                 tmsp_last_updt 
                 Datetime 
               
               
                   
                 dow_id 
                 Integer 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     It should be noted that the dow_id field, as well as other fields, may contain a numerical representation of data to be inputted within a field, such as, instead of text for the day of the week that a call was placed, using 1=Sunday, 2=Monday, etc. 
     Operation of DataLoader Process 
     FIG. 7 is a logical diagram that depicts operation of the DL process  320 . As shown by block  321 , the DL process  320  application can be started manually or as a result of a trigger event such as the posting of a customer&#39;s monthly data on an FTP site, or some similar type of event. As shown by block  322 , initial user data is then selected. The DL script process is then run, as shown by block  323 . 
     In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention, the DL script process includes the following steps. As shown by block  324 , the DL script process is first started. Parameters are then retrieved from the dataloader process  320  application, as shown by block  325 . As shown by block  326 , the user&#39;s authorization is then checked in order to run the dataloader process  320  application. As shown by block  327 , all pre-process SQL scripts are then executed to check the integrity/validity of the data and to otherwise put the data into the appropriate format for data transformation. Data transformation services (DTS)  328  are then used to load the pre-processed data. As shown by block  329 , all post-process SQL scripts are then executed to confirm the integrity/validity of the data, after which the DL script is exited (block  331 ). 
     After the DL script process  323  is run, the DL process  320  selects a wireless service provider, or carrier, provided customer account and related (e.g., usage history) data  332 . The DL script process is then run again  333 , after which the DL process  320  selects “CallDetail Data”  334 . As shown by block  335 , the DL script process once again runs, after which the DL application ends block  336 . 
     Build Profile Process 
     The following further illustrates the build profile process  350  with reference to FIG. 5, in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention. FIG. 5 depicts input and output of the optimator  370 . The MAMBA system  100  provides a method to create calling_profile records  360  from the call_detail data  340  imported using the DL process  320 . These calling profile records  360  provide a rolled-up view of each account&#39;s call usage, reducing for a given account or subscriber what may be, for example, the hundreds or thousands of individual call detail records (N) generated into a single calling_profile record  360 . This data reduction reduces the computations performed by optimator  370  in order to analyze a single account or subscriber by a similar amount. 
     The calling_profile record  360  is created by the buildProfile process  350 . This record is used by the optimator process  370 , which provides a service plan comparison and generates a list of potential service plans that may better fit the account or subscriber&#39;s particular calling profile. The calling_profile record  360  contains the fields and source data shown in Table 5. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 5 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Fields and Source Data Contained in calling_profile Record 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Field Name 
                 Data Type 
                 Len 
                 Source data 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 profile_id 
                 Integer 
                   
                 IDENTITY field 
               
               
                 account_id 
                 Integer 
                   
                 from the user/account record 
               
               
                 date_created 
                 DateTime 
                   
                 current date 
               
               
                 billing_period 
                 DateTime 
                   
                 contains the billing period 
               
               
                 periods_averaged 
                 Integer 
                   
                 contains the number of 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 periods averaged for this 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 record. 
               
               
                 monthly_minutes 
                 Integer 
                   
                 sum of all minutes for a 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 month 
               
               
                 peak_percentage 
                 Decimal 
                   
                 buildProfile process 
               
               
                 offpeak_percentage 
                 Decimal 
                   
                 buildProfile process 
               
               
                 local_percentage 
                 Decimal 
                   
                 buildProfile process 
               
               
                 home_zip 
                 Varchar 
                 20 
                 From the user/address record 
               
               
                 corp_zip 
                 Varchar 
                 20 
                 From the user/client/address 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 record 
               
               
                 alt_zip1 
                 Varchar 
                 20 
                 buildProfile process 
               
               
                 alt_zip2 
                 Varchar 
                 20 
                 buildProfile process 
               
               
                 alt_zip3 
                 Varchar 
                 20 
                 buildProfile process 
               
               
                 alt_zip4 
                 Varchar 
                 20 
                 buildProfile process 
               
               
                 home_zip_percentage 
                 Decimal 
                   
                 buildProfile process 
               
               
                 corp_zip_percentage 
                 Decimal 
                   
                 buildProfile process 
               
               
                 alt_zip1_percentage 
                 Decimal 
                   
                 buildProfile process 
               
               
                 alt_zip2_percentage 
                 Decimal 
                   
                 buildProfile process 
               
               
                 alt_zip3_percentage 
                 Decimal 
                   
                 buildProfile process 
               
               
                 alt_zip4_percentage 
                 Decimal 
                   
                 buildProfile process 
               
               
                 total_calls 
                 Integer 
                   
                 buildProfile process 
               
               
                 total_rejected_calls 
                 Integer 
                   
                 buildProfile process 
               
               
                 user_last_updt 
                 Varchar 
                 20 
                 Username of person creating 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 record 
               
               
                 tmsp_last_updt 
                 DateTime 
                   
                 Current date 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     The originating_city and originating_state from each call_detail record  340  may be used to determine the originating postal_code from the zip_code table. This process results in some degree of approximation because of the different methods employed by the carriers to input the destination_city information, e.g., Kansas_cit for Kansas City. However, using both the originating_city and originating_state minimizes the chances of selecting the wrong city, e.g., avoiding selecting Austin, Pa. instead of Austin, Tex., because of including the originating_state in this process. 
     All calls not made from either the home or corporate zip code are separated by originating_city, originating_state zip code and the total number of minutes added for each. Once calls have been separated into separate zip codes, using one implementation of the buildprofile process  350 , if there are four or fewer zip codes, the zip codes may be written to the zip code fields, e.g., alt_zip 1 , alt_zip 2 , alt_zip 3  and alt_zip 4 , in descending order by the amount of minutes for each zip code and the corresponding minutes, as a percentage of the total, may be written to the corresponding zip code percentage fields, e.g., alt_zip 1 _percentage, alt_zip 2 _percentage, alt_zip 3 _percentage and alt_zip 4 _percentage. 
     However, in this particular implementation, if there are more than four zip code sets, the zip code with the highest number of minutes is written to alt_zip 1 . Then the remaining zip codes are grouped by combining zip codes with the same first 3 digits, e.g., 787xx, and adding up the associated minutes. 
     Once this grouping has been completed, and if there are more than three groupings in this implementation, the zip code from the grouping with the highest number of minutes is added to alt_zip 2 . The remaining zip codes may then be grouped by combining zip codes with the same first two digits, e.g., 78xxx, and adding up the associated minutes. 
     Once this grouping has been completed, and if there are more than two groupings in this implementation, the zip code from the grouping with the highest number of minutes is added to alt_zip 3 . The remaining zip codes may then be grouped by combining zip codes with the same first digit, e.g., 7xxxx, and adding up the associated minutes. Once this grouping has been completed, the zip code with the highest number of minutes may be added to alt_zip 4 . 
     Once completed, the percentages may be computed from the total number of minutes and written to each zip code percentage field, including the home_zip_percentage and corp_zip_percentage fields. The periods_averaged field of the buildProfile process  350  contains the number of periods averaged to create this record. Records that are created by the buildProfile process  350  contain a value of 1 in this field. Records created by the “AvgProfilesByClient” or the “AvgProfilesByAccount” functions contain the number of profile records found for the given client or account with a billing period during the given dates. However, this value may be decremented due to the fact that the user has changed home market during that time frame. 
     Operation of BuildProfile Process 
     FIG. 8 depicts the operation of a buildProfile process  350 . As shown by block  351 , a MAMBALaunch application is started either manually or based upon a trigger event such as those mentioned above. As shown by block  352 , the buildProfile process  350  calls a “TwiMAMBA.clsMAMBA.Build Profiles” function. As shown by block  353 , the buildProfile process  350  is then started. As shown by block  354 , the process gets “callDetail” records for the accounts for the given client and date range. As shown by block  355 , the process analyzes the calls and, as shown in block  356 , creates the profiles record. As shown by block  357 , the program then exits the buildProfile process  350 . The process then returns to the MAMBALaunch application and, as shown by block  358 , executes a function write profile identifications to file. As shown by block  359 , the buildProfile process  350  then exits MAMBALaunch Application. 
     Data “Bucketizing” Functions 
     The data “bucketizing” functions, previously mentioned with reference to the buildProfile process  350  portion of FIG. 5, guide the analyzing and classifying of the call detail data  340  for use in the MAMBA system  100  processes. These functions provide the data classification and reduction used to populate the calling_profile record  360  of the MAMBA system  100 . This structure is organized according to three dimensions or parameters of a call, and are as follows: 
     1) “When”: time of day (ToD) and day of week (DoW). “When” parameters are used to determine when a call was made or received as determined by three (3) “buckets”: peak, off peak or weekend. The service plan record of the service plan that a subscriber is currently using functions as the default ToD and DoW parameters. 
     The ToD/DoW parameters are as follows: 
     For the subscriber under consideration, if the call_date, dow_id (1-7 with each number corresponding to a fixed day of the week) is not between the weekend_start_dow and the weekend_end_dow, and was placed between weekday_peak_start and weekday_peak_end times, then the call is characterized as a “peak call.” 
     For the subscriber under consideration, if the call_date, dow_id is not between the weekend_start_dow and the weekend_end_dow, and was not placed between weekday_peak_start and weekday_peak_end times, then the call is considered an “off-peak call.” 
     If the call_date, dow_id equals the weekend_start_dow and was made between the after the weekday_peak_end time or if the call_date, dow_id is on the weekend_end_dow and was made between the before the weekday_peak_start time, or if the call_date, dow_id falls between the weekend_start_dow and the weekend_end_dow, then the call is considered a “weekend call.” 
     2) “What”: Type of Call—local or toll. These parameters determine the type of call that was made/received as determined by three (3) “buckets”: local, intrastate_toll and interstate_toll. 
     The local/toll parameters are as follows: 
     If called_city equals “incoming” or &lt;null&gt; or called_number equals &lt;null&gt; then the call is a “local call.” 
     If the mobile_id_number lata_number (as derived from npa-nxx number combination)=destination_number lata_number, as derived from the npa-nxx number combination, then the call is considered to have been originated and terminated within the same Local Access Transport Area (LATA) and is therefore categorized as a “local call.” As known by those skilled in the art, a npa-nxx is defined as the numbering plan area (NPA) and office code (Nxx) of an end user&#39;s telephone number. 
     If neither of the two parameters above is true, then the call is a “toll call.” 
     If the mobile_id_number lata_number state (as derived from the npa-nxx number combination)=destination_number lata_number state, as derived from the npa-nxx number combination, then the call is considered to have originated and terminated within the same sate and is therefore categorized as an “intrastate_toll call.” 
     If none of the above parameters are applicable, then the call is an “interstate_toll call.” 
     These tests may use a table that allows a local access transport area (LATA) number to be associated with an npa nxx. The LATA (npa xxx) information also contains city and state information. A Local Exchange Routing Guide (LERG) table may also contain the information used. 
     3) “Where”: Where calls are made or received (home or non-home). These parameters determine where calls were made or received by the mobile end of the wireless communications connection represented by the call detail record under consideration. Several possible buckets may be defined according to different embodiments of the invention. By way of example, under one embodiment of a set of data “bucketizing” parameters, there may be the following six (6) possible buckets defined: home_zip, corp_zip, alt 1 _zip, alt 2 _zip, alt 3 _zip, alt 4 _zip. 
     The Home/non-Home parameters are as follows: 
     If the originating_city equals &lt;null&gt; or the lata_number of the originating_city, originating_state pair=the lata_number of mobile_id_number (npa_nxx matching), then the call was made from the “Home” region and allocated to the home_zip_percentage. Otherwise, the call is allocated to either the corporate zip_percentage or one of the alt_zip_percentage “buckets, depending upon the zip code associated with the the originating city and according to the alt_zip_percentage rules previously defined. 
     The Optimator Process 
     FIG. 9 depicts the optimator process  370 , and how it is implemented. The optimator process  370  uses the calling_profile record  360  for a given subscriber as input for the analysis of the usage patterns to provide recommendations for the most economical cellular service plans (see FIG. 7) for the specific billing period associated with that profile record. Further, the optimator process  370  receives as input the various service_plans  720 , service_plan (sp)  20  packages  730 , and coverage_areas  740  that are offered by various carriers and that are associated with each sp_package  730 . The optimator process  370  may return different numbers of recommendations per analysis. For example, in one implementation, the optimator process  370  returns up to three recommendations per analysis. The number of recommendations can be changed through an “instance variable.” 
     The recommendations are created as records in the service_plan_instance  390  and package_instance tables  710 . These records are linked to the associated account by a record in the rate_plan_evaluation table  380  which, in turn, is associated with the specific billing period associated with the calling_profile record. The optimator process  370  returns the identification of this new record. 
     Operation for Creating Rate Plan Evaluations 
     FIG. 10 depicts the operation for the process of creating rate plan evaluations  440 . Block  351  depicts the step of starting the MAMBALaunch Application. As shown by block  381 , a “TwiMAMBA.clsMAMBA.Run Profiler” process is called. As shown by block  382 , a “runProfiler” process is started. As shown by block  383 , the profile identification files created in block  358  of FIG. 8 are then read. As shown by block  384 , a program “TwiOptimzer.Optimator.DoEval” is called. As shown by block  385 , a “doEval” process is started. As shown by block  386 , the current calling profile is read. As shown by block  387 , the profile for the lower cost calling plans are then evaluated. As shown by block  388 , the rate_plan_evaluation  380 , service plan  390  and package instance  710  records are created. As shown by block  389 , the doEval process is then exited. As shown by block  391 , the runProfiler process makes the decision as to whether all profile identifications have been evaluated. If the answer is “no”, the program returns to block  384 , in which TwiOptimzer.Optimator.DoEval function is again called and the program continues through each step again until block  391  is reached again. If the answer is “yes” in block  391 , the runProfiler process is exited, as shown in block  392 . The MAMBAlaunch application then writes the eval identifications (Ids) to the file, as shown in block  393 . Then as shown by block  394 , the MAMBAlaunch application is exited. 
     Averaging Profiles 
     FIG. 11 depicts the process of averaging profiles  810  and how it is implemented. The MAMBA system  100  allows the user to obtain a moving average  820  of the calling totals assigned to any calling profile records  360  that have a billing date within a given date range. This average  820  provides the user with a snapshot of cellular service use within a given period. 
     AvgProfilesByClient and avgProfilesByAccount (see “The MAMBA Component”) methods (FIGS. 39 and 40) allow the user to average the calling profiles by either client or individual account. These methods create a calling profile record  820  that contains the average of usage for the calling profiles  360  created during the given period, and then return the identification of the new record. 
     The DecidePlan Process 
     Returning to FIG. 5, the optimator process  370  output, specifically a variable number of service_plan_instances  390 , reflects the lowest cost options based upon the calling profile analyzed. As such, the optimator  370  results represent a single point-in-time period, for example, one month, for that particular user without taking into account any historical trending information that might be available for that user. What is therefore needed but has been heretofore unaddressed in the art, is a methodology for using a series of single period optimator  370  results  390  to determine the optimal service plan for that user over an appropriate period of time, as depicted in FIG.  5 . The decidePlan process  400  leverages available chronological information to assist in the determination of what service plan would be optimal for a given wireless user. 
     The decidePlan process  400  is based upon what can best be described as a “historical prediction” algorithm. Given the fundamental complexity of determining the optimal service plan solution set, the application of a traditional trend-based predictive methodology, e.g., a linear or other form of extrapolation, is not practical. Rather, the decidePlan process  400  leverages the “hindsight” intrinsic to a series of historical single period optimator  370  analyses in order to predict the optimal solution looking forward. 
     The decidePlan process  400  takes advantage of the “reactive system” type of behavior that is inherent in the analysis or decision process for selecting the optimal plan for a given subscriber. Specifically, the decision engine  400  calculates the total cost for a given set of optimator  370  generated service_plan_instances  390  over a known set of historical periods. The decidePlan process  400  then compares this total cost to the optimator  370  results of the corresponding service_plan_instances  390  for the most recent single period available, and on that basis predicts the optimal service plan going forward. 
     The known set of historical optimator  370  results is referred to herein as the “training set,” while the single most recent set of period results is referred to as the “test set”, where the test set period can also be included as part of the training set. An optimal service plan solution is selected from the training set and then compared to the result of the test set to determine how well the training set would have predicted the test set result. In implementing the training and test set, the data set to execute the historical prediction analysis is preferably a minimum of two periods, two periods for the training set and one period for the test set, in order to execute the historical prediction. 
     The relative attractiveness of a service plan instance  390  is determined by comparing it to the corresponding actual billed usage of the current service plan for the given period(s). The specific measure, termed “efficiency”, is calculated as the following ratio: 
     
       
         efficiency=current plan costs/service plan instance estimated cost 
       
     
     If the efficiency factor is greater than 1, then the service plan instance is more cost effective than the current plan. Among a group of service plan instances, the plan instance with the highest efficiency factor is the optimal solution. 
     Implementation of the historical prediction analytic and decisionmaking model is best demonstrated by way of example. Table 6 shows an exemplary two period set of optimator  370  results for a single subscriber. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 6 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Example of Historical Prediction Model 
               
               
                 for a Two Period Set of Results 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                   
                 Efficiency 
                   
                 Efficiency 
               
               
                   
                 Training Set 
                 (Current/ 
                 Test Set 
                 (Current/ 
               
               
                   
                 Month 1 
                 Plan X) 
                 Month 2 
                 Plan X) 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Calling 
                 200 
                   
                 250 
                   
               
               
                   
                 Profile 
               
               
                   
                 MOUs 
               
               
                 PLANS 
                 A 
                 $50 
                 1.38 
                 $50 
                 1.38 
               
               
                   
                 B 
                 $65 
                 1.06 
                 $65 
                 1.06 
               
               
                   
                 C 
                 $40 
                 1.73 
                  $45* 
                  1.53* 
               
               
                   
                 D 
                 $60 
                 1.15 
                 $60 
                 1.15 
               
               
                   
                 E 
                  $30* 
                  2.30* 
                 $45 
                  1.53* 
               
               
                   
                 Current 
                 $69 
                 1.00 
                 $69 
                 1.00 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Where * indicates the lowest cost plan option  
               
             
          
         
       
     
     Based upon this minimum two period data set, the training set predicts plan E as the optimal choice, a selection confirmed by the corresponding results for the test set (Month  2 ). 
     The larger the data set, where larger is measured by the number of periods of service plan instance results available for the training set, the better the forward looking “prediction” will likely be. Table 7 shows the same two period data set presented earlier in Table 6, extended by an additional four periods, for a total of six periods, with five applied to the training set and one to the test set. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 7 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Example of Historical Prediction Model for a Six Period Set of Results 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Training Set 
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Mon 
                 Mon 
                 Mon 
                 Mon 
                 Mon 
                 Sum 
                 Training Set 
                   
                 Mon 6 
               
               
                   
                 1 
                 2 
                 3 
                 4 
                 5 
                 1-5 
                 efficiency 
                 Mon 6 
                 Efficiency 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Calling 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Profile 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 MOUs 
                 200 
                 250 
                 300 
                 260 
                 310 
                   
                   
                 225 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 PLANS 
                 A 
                 $50 
                 $50 
                 $60 
                 $60 
                 $62 
                 $282 
                 1.22 
                 $50 
                 1.38 
               
               
                   
                 B 
                 $65 
                 $65 
                 $65 
                 $65 
                 $65 
                 $325 
                 1.06 
                 $65 
                 1.06 
               
               
                   
                 C 
                 $40 
                 $45 
                 $50 
                 $46 
                 $52 
                 $233* 
                 1.48* 
                 $42 
                 1.64 
               
               
                   
                 D 
                 $60 
                 $60 
                 $60 
                 $60 
                 $62 
                 $302 
                 1.14 
                 $60 
                 1.15 
               
               
                   
                 E 
                 $30 
                 $45 
                 $60 
                 $48 
                 $62 
                 $245 
                 1.41 
                 $37* 
                 1.86* 
               
               
                   
                 Current 
                 $69 
                 $69 
                 $69 
                 $69 
                 $69 
                 $345 
                 1.00 
                 $69 
                 1.00 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Where * indicates the lowest cost plan option  
               
             
          
         
       
     
     In this case, use of only the most recent period&#39;s, month  6 , optimator  370  output would have resulted in the selection of plan E as the optimal service plan option for this user or account. However, applying the historical prediction analysis, the total of 1-5 ranked by efficiency factor, the optimator  370  output indicates that plan C would be optimal choice for this user. Although plan E would have been the best option in for the most recent period, month  6 , when the variability of this subscriber&#39;s usage profile is taken into account over the available six period data set, plan C would have been selected as the superior solution. 
     The above analysis assumes that the data in the test set has equal “value” in the analysis. In reality, the more recent the data set, or the “fresher” the data, the more relevant it is to the analysis as it reflects the more recent behavior of the user. Thus, the use of a weighting strategy which gives greater relevance to more current, fresher data as compared to the older, more stale data, improves the predictive results. Optionally, the weighing strategy can be added to the decideplan process if needed to provide such increase relevance to more recent data. 
     There are a number of possible weighting functions that can be applied. One possible weighting function would be an exponential envelope of the type: 
     
       
         weighting factor= n+e   (1-Period)  where  n &gt;=0 
       
     
     The weighting functions for n=0, n=0.5, n=1 and n=2 are plotted in FIG.  13 . Data that is four periods old is weighted as 14% of that of the most recent month. The n=0 function more aggressively discounts older data than does the n=1 function, where the same four period back data is weighted at a level about one-half that of the most recent period data set. 
     Applying these two versions of exponential weighting envelopes to the previous six periods of training and test data sets generates the result set shown in Table 8, with the original “equal weighting” results shown as well for reference. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 8 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Results of Table 7 Data After Applying the Weighting Factor 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Training Set 
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Mon 
                 Mon 
                 Mon 
                 Mon 
                 Mon 
                 Sum 
                 Training Set 
                 Mon 
                 Mon 6 
               
               
                   
                 1 
                 2 
                 3 
                 4 
                 5 
                 1-5 
                 efficiency 
                 6 
                 Efficiency 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Calling 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Profile 
               
               
                   
                 MOUs 
                 200 
                 250 
                 300 
                 260 
                 310 
                   
                   
                 225 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 PLANS 
                 A 
                 $50 
                 $50 
                 $60 
                 $60 
                 $62 
                 $282 
                 1.22 
                 $50 
                 1.38 
               
               
                   
                 B 
                 $65 
                 $65 
                 $65 
                 $65 
                 $65 
                 $325 
                 1.06 
                 $65 
                 1.06 
               
               
                   
                 C 
                 $40 
                 $45 
                 $50 
                 $46 
                 $52 
                 $233* 
                 1.48 
                 $42 
                 1.64 
               
               
                   
                 D 
                 $60 
                 $60 
                 $60 
                 $60 
                 $62 
                 $302 
                 1.14 
                 $60 
                 1.15 
               
               
                   
                 E 
                 $30 
                 $45 
                 $60 
                 $48 
                 $62 
                 $245 
                 1.41 
                 $37* 
                 1.86* 
               
               
                   
                 Current 
                 $69 
                 $69 
                 $69 
                 $69 
                 $69 
                 $345 
                 1.00 
                 $69 
                 1.00 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Weighting 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Factor 
               
               
                   
                 n = 1 
                 1.02 
                 1.05 
                 1.14 
                 1.37 
                 2.00 
                   
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 PLANS 
                 A 
                 $51 
                 $53 
                 $68 
                 $82 
                 $124 
                 $378 
                 1.20 
                 $50 
                 1.38 
               
               
                   
                 B 
                 $66 
                 $68 
                 $74 
                 $89 
                 $130 
                 $428 
                 1.06 
                 $65 
                 1.06 
               
               
                   
                 C 
                 $41 
                 $47 
                 $57 
                 $63 
                 $104 
                 $312* 
                 1.46* 
                 $42 
                 1.64 
               
               
                   
                 D 
                 $61 
                 $63 
                 $68 
                 $82 
                 $124 
                 $399 
                 1.14 
                 $60 
                 1.15 
               
               
                   
                 E 
                 $31 
                 $47 
                 $68 
                 $66 
                 $124 
                 $336 
                 1.35 
                 $37* 
                 1.86* 
               
               
                   
                 Current 
                 $70 
                 $72 
                 $79 
                 $95 
                 $138 
                 $454 
                 1.00 
                 $69 
                 1.00 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Weighting 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Factor 
               
               
                   
                 n = 0 
                 0.02 
                 0.05 
                 0.14 
                 0.37 
                 1.00 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 PLANS 
                 A 
                 $1 
                 $3 
                 $8 
                 $22 
                 $62 
                 $96 
                 1.13 
                 $50 
                 1.38 
               
               
                   
                 B 
                 $1 
                 $3 
                 $9 
                 $24 
                 $65 
                 $103 
                 1.06 
                 $65 
                 1.06 
               
               
                   
                 C 
                 $1 
                 $2 
                 $7 
                 $17 
                 $52 
                 $79 
                 1.38* 
                 $42 
                 1.64 
               
               
                   
                 D 
                 $1 
                 $3 
                 $8 
                 $22 
                 $62 
                 $97 
                 1.13 
                 $60 
                 1.15 
               
               
                   
                 E 
                 $1 
                 $2 
                 $8 
                 $18 
                 $62 
                 $91 
                 1.20 
                 $37* 
                 1.86* 
               
               
                   
                 Current 
                 $1 
                 $3 
                 $10 
                 $26 
                 $69 
                 $109 
                 1.00 
                 $69 
                 1.00 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Where * indicates the lowest cost plan option  
               
             
          
         
       
     
     Although the result of the historical prediction analysis in this specific scenario does not change per se as a result of applying either weighting scheme to the training set, where both the n=1 and n=0 weightings identify Plan C as the optimal plan, the application of these two weighting envelopes do have the effect of increasing the “spread” between the efficiency factor of the optimal plan, plan C, as compared to the next best solution, plan E. This is compared against the actual cost because the weighting function that more heavily favors recent or fresher data, i.e., the n=0 exponential decay envelope, provides a greater efficiency spread (1.38−1.20, or 0.18) compared to the n=1 weighting function that less aggressively discounts older or more “stale” data (1.46−1.35 or 0.11). 
     The methodology, historical prediction with time-based weighting, described thus far does not take into account the intrinsic period-to-period variability in the user or account&#39;s behavior. One way this variability is reflected is by the user&#39;s usage of the account, as measured by the minutes of wireless service use on a period-by-period basis. By measuring the standard deviation in a usage set for the user or account, and comparing it to per period usage data, the suitability of the data set for each period can be assessed relative to the total available array of periodic data sets. In particular, a significant “discontinuity” in a usage pattern of a user or account, for example, as a result of an extraordinary but temporary amount of business travel, especially if such a spike occurs in a current or near-current data period, could skew the results of the analysis and provide a less-than-optimal service plan solution or recommendation on a going-forward basis. 
     To appreciate the potential impact of period-to-period deviations, consider for example two calling profiles arrays: one for the baseline data set that has been examined thus far, and another for a more variable data set. These two data sets, their average and standard deviations and the deviations of the usage profile of each period to the average, are shown in Table 9. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 9 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Comparison of Baseline and Variable Data Sets 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Training Set 
                 Test Set 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Mon 
                 Mon 
                 Mon 
                 Mon 
                 Mon 
                 1-5 
                 1-5 
                 Mon 
                 1-6 
                 1-6 
               
               
                   
                 1 
                 2 
                 3 
                 4 
                 5 
                 Ave 
                 StdDev 
                 6 
                 Ave 
                 StdDev 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 Baseline 
                 200 
                 250 
                 300 
                 260 
                 310 
                 264 
                 43.9 
                 225 
                 258 
                 42.4 
               
               
                 Calling 
               
               
                 Profile 
               
               
                 MOUs 
               
               
                 Ave. − X 
                 64 
                 14 
                 36 
                 4 
                 46 
                   
                   
                 33 
               
               
                 &gt;StdDev 
                 yes 
                 no 
                 no 
                 no 
                 yes 
                   
                   
                 no 
               
               
                 Second 
                 350 
                 400 
                 375 
                 600 
                 325 
                 410 
                 109.8 
                 320 
                 395 
                 104.9 
               
               
                 Calling 
               
               
                 Profile 
               
               
                 MOUs 
               
               
                 Ave. − X 
                 60 
                 10 
                 35 
                 190 
                 85 
                   
                   
                 75 
               
               
                 &gt;StdDev 
                 no 
                 no 
                 no 
                 yes 
                 no 
                   
                   
                 no 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     Using one standard deviation unit (one sigma, or σ) as the “filter” to identify and exclude discontinuities in a sequence of calling profiles, results in months 1 and 5 of the baseline sequence, and month 4 of the second calling profile sequence, being excluded from the analysis. 
     Another parameter that can be factored into the decision process of the present invention of what service plan to select for a given user or account, based upon an array of calling profiles and optimator  370  service plan instance  390  inputs, is the sensitivity of the result set to changes in calling profile. Specifically, the service plan solution set, plans A-E in the example used up to this point, should be tested by perturbing the usage profile in a positive and negative fashion by a fixed usage amount, for example, one σ. The results are shown in Table 10. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 10 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Results of Perturbing the Usage Profile by One Sigma 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Sum Mon 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 1-5 
                 Training 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 (using n = 0 
                 Set 
                 Ave/ 
                 Mon 
                 Mon 6 
                 +1 Sigma 
                 −1 Sigma 
               
               
                   
                 weighting) 
                 efficiency 
                 StdDev 
                 6 
                 efficiency 
                 Cost eff. 
                 Cost eff. 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Calling 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Profile 
                   
                   
                 264/ 
                   
               
               
                   
                 MOUs 
                   
                   
                 43.9 
                 225 
                   
                 269 
                 181 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 PLANS 
                 A 
                 $96 
                 1.13 
                   
                 $50 
                 1.38 
                 $52 
                 1.33 
                 $50 
                 1.38 
               
               
                   
                 B 
                 $103 
                 1.06 
                   
                 $65 
                 1.06 
                 $65 
                 1.06 
                 $65 
                 1.06 
               
               
                   
                 C 
                 $79 
                 1.38* 
                   
                 $42 
                 1.64 
                 $47 
                 1.47* 
                 $37 
                 1.86 
               
               
                   
                 D 
                 $97 
                 1.13 
                   
                 $60 
                 1.15 
                 $60 
                 1.15 
                 $60 
                 1.15 
               
               
                   
                 E 
                 $91 
                 1.20 
                   
                 $37 
                 1.86* 
                 $47 
                 1.47* 
                 $27 
                 2.56* 
               
               
                   
                 Current 
                 $109 
                 1.00 
                   
                 $69 
                 1.00 
                 $69** 
                 1.00 
                 $69** 
                 1.00 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Where * indicates the lowest cost plan option  
               
               
                 **this sensitivity cannot be performed unless the current plan is known  
               
             
          
         
       
     
     Based on the above “±one sigma” analysis, the optimal service plan option, minimizing the sensitivity of the decision to variations in usage both up and down, is plan E. Using only the upside variation results in the selection of plan C. Because there is less sensitivity to an upside in usage than a downside for many wireless service plans currently offered by the wireless service providers, either weighting the +1 analysis more heavily than the −1 analysis, or using only the +1 analysis results in the selection of plan C. 
     The implementation of the decision algorithms into the decidePlan process must allow for one of the following four (4) possible recommendations or actions: 
     1. The current plan is optimal; take no action. 
     2. There is a more optimal plan; if the savings is sufficient (efficiency&gt;1.x) where x is the historical percentage savings, then change plans. 
     3. As a result of insufficient data, e.g., only one period of usable data is available, there is a &gt;±1 Sigma variation in the most recent period&#39;s calling profile, etc.; therefore, take no action, and flag the reason why no action was taken. 
     4. Even though an optimal plan was identified, other parameters (e.g., a maximum period-to-period variance) were exceeded and therefore an accurate recommendation cannot be possible. 
     As with the dataLoad  320 , buildProfile  350  and optimator  370  processes, decidePlan  400  can be implemented as a manual or automated process. The following inputs may be used to launch the decidePlan process  400 . Please note that blank spaces indicate input variable numbers that are considered to be within the scope of the present invention. 
     1. Client Name 
     2. Account: active accounts (default) or ______ account file 
     3. Analysis Parameters 
     a. Data window: available periods (default) or ______ periods 
     b. Calling profile selection filter: yes/no (default no) within ______ Sigma 
     c. Sensitivity analysis range: ±______% or ±______ Sigma 
     d. Minimum savings filter: ______% (default 20%) 
     FIG. 12 shows the anticipated organization/sequence of steps of the decision process  900  that make up the decidePlan  400  process, which is described in detail herein below. 
     Presentation of Recommendations or Actions 
     If the MAMBA system  100  returns any recommendations for the given user, the MAMBA system  100  takes the user information and the information for the recommended cellular service plans and dynamically creates a report Web page that details this information. The HTML for this report Web page is stored in the database  74  for later display. Once the report Web page has been generated, the MAMBA system  100  sends an electronic mail message (email) to the specified user informing the user of the availability of more economical cellular service plans. This email may contain a hyperlink that will allow them to navigate to the stored HTML Web report. The HTML Web report page contains the information shown in Table 11. It should be noted that the presentation may also be made without use of the Web, but instead may be presented via any means of communication. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 11 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Information contained in HTML Web Report 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 Client Name 
                   
                 Date Generated 
               
               
                 Department ID 
               
               
                 User Name 
                 Current Plan Name (hyperlink) 
                 Recommend Plan Name 1 (hyperlink) 
               
               
                   
                   
                 Recommend Plan Name 2 (hyperlink) 
               
               
                   
                   
                 Recommend Plan Name 3 (hyperlink) 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     The user information is repeated for all requested users or accounts. The hyperlinks allow the viewer to view the specific information for the given plan. 
     The MAMBA system  100  causes the creation of a table that contains the HTML code for the report Web page and an ID value that will be part of the hyperlink that is sent to the user. The MAMBA system  100  may also cause the fields in Table 12 to be added to the USER table. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 12 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Fields the MAMBA System May Add to USER Table 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Field Name 
                 Data Type 
                 Length 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 MAMBA 
                 Varchar 
                 1 
               
               
                   
                 MAMBAMailDate 
                 DateTime 
               
               
                   
                 MAMBAViewDate 
                 DateTime 
               
               
                   
                 MAMBAReviewUser 
                 Varchar 
                 50 
               
               
                   
                 MAMBAHTML 
                 Text 
                 32765 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     The MAMBA field may contain either a “Y” or “N” to denote to which user to send the MAMBA email for a given account. The MAMBAMailDate may contain the date the email was sent to the specified user, and the MAMBAReviewDate may contain the date the MAMBA report Web page was viewed. Further, the MAMBAReviewUser field may contain the user name of the person who viewed the MAMBA report Web page. Also, the MAMBAHTML field may contain the HTML code for the Web report page. 
     The MAMBA Component 
     The MAMBA Component (twiMAMBA) may be configured to implement a number of different methods, a few of which are shown by example in Tables 13-16 for completing the preferred functionality. These methods are as follows: 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 13 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 BuildProfile—Method that builds the calling_profile record 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 Name 
                 Type 
                 Description 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 A. Parameters: 
               
               
                 IclientID 
                 Integer 
                 client id to process 
               
               
                 DloadStartDate 
                 Date 
                 first date to process 
               
               
                 DloadEndDate 
                 Date 
                 last date to process 
               
               
                 IprofileIds( ) 
                 Integer array 
                 returned array of created profile ids 
               
               
                 InumZips 
                 Integer 
                 number of zip codes to process 
               
             
          
           
               
                 B. Returns 
               
               
                 True—upon successful completion 
               
               
                 False—upon failed completion 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 14 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 RunProfiler—Method that launches the optimator process 370 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Name 
                 Type 
                 Description 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 A. Parameters: 
               
               
                   
                 iProfileIDs( ) 
                 Integer array 
                 array of profile ids—returned by 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 buildProfile 
               
               
                   
                 dLoadStartDate 
                 Date 
                 returned array of evaluation ids 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 B. Returns: 
               
               
                   
                 True—upon successful completion 
               
               
                   
                 False—upon failed completion 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     
       
         
               
             
               
             
               
               
               
             
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 15 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 AvgProfilesByClient-Method that takes a client name, a start and an end 
               
               
                 date, and then averages the usage totals for all profile records with a 
               
               
                 billing period between those dates and creates a new profile record. 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                  A. Parameters: 
               
             
          
           
               
                  Name 
                 Type 
                 Description 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 SclientName 
                 string 
                 name of client to process 
               
               
                 DstartDate 
                 date 
                 first date to process 
               
               
                 DendDate 
                 date 
                 last date to process 
               
               
                 IavgProfileIDs() 
                 integer array 
                 array of average profile ids-returned 
               
               
                   
                   
                 by buildProfile 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                  B. Returns: 
               
               
                 True-upon successful completion 
               
               
                 False-upon failed completion 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     
       
         
               
             
               
             
               
               
               
             
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 16 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 AvgProfilesByAccount-Method that takes an account ID, a start and an 
               
               
                 end date, and then averages the usage totals for all profile records with a 
               
               
                 billing period between those dates and creates a new profile record. 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                  A. Parameters: 
               
             
          
           
               
                  Name 
                 Type 
                 Description 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 IAccountId 
                 integer 
                 account id 
               
               
                 DStartDate 
                 date 
                 first date to process 
               
               
                 DEndDate 
                 date 
                 last date to process 
               
               
                 IAvgProfileIDs() 
                 integer array 
                 array of average profile ids-returned 
               
               
                   
                   
                 by buildProfile 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                  B. Returns: 
               
               
                 True-upon successful completion 
               
               
                 False-upon failed completion 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     FIG. 12 depicts the decision process  900  of the decidePlan process  400  (FIG.  5 ). The inputs of block  905 , client_id, accounts, data_periods, cp_filter, sensitivity_range, and savings_hurdle, are directed to the select account info function of block  910 . The select account info of  910  includes account_id, cp_ids, and service_plan_instances. Once the select account info  910  has been processed, the process proceeds to the decision block  915 , where the decision is made if the cp count is less than 2. If “YES”, the process proceeds to block  920 , for no action because of insufficient data or records. If the decision of block  915  is “NO”, the process proceeds to block  925  for the functions of determine cp data and set using cp_filter input. From block  925 , the process moves to the decision block  930 , where the decision is made if the cp count is less than 2. If “YES”, the process again moves to block  920  for no action because of unsufficient trend data. If the decision of block  930  is “NO”, the process proceeds to block  935  for the function of create candidate sp_id list based on most recent period. From the function of block  935 , the process proceeds to block  940 , for the function of compare candidate list to sp_ids for sp_instances in all applicable periods, based on cp list. From block  940 , the process then proceeds to the decision block  950 , where the decision is made, “are all sp_ids represented in all applicable periods?” If “NO”, the process proceeds to block  955 , for the function of run optimator  370  to create additional sp_instances. From the function of  955 , the process then proceeds to the function of block  960 , perform historical prediction analysis and rank candidate sp_ids by efficiency factor. If the decision of block  950  is “YES” (all sp_ids are represented in applicable periods), then the process proceeds directly to the function of block  960  of performing historical prediction analysis. After the historical prediction analysis of block  960  is complete, the process proceeds to block  965  for performing sensitivity analysis, and rank candidate sp_ids by relative sensitivity. Once the function of block  965  is complete, the process then moves to the final step of  970 , for recording decision results, mapping to the corresponding action and/or recommendation. 
     The Application Related to MAMBA System 
     The following represents a detailed description of the logic of the system and method for analyzing the wireless communication records and for determining optimal wireless communication service plans. 
     FIG. 14 depicts the operation  1000  of the buildprofile process  350 . In block  1010 , the process begins with the “Enter” function. In block  1020 , a decision is made if getClientId is TRUE. If the answer is “NO”, the process then goes to the Exit function, shown in block  1220 . If the answer is “YES”, then the process proceeds to block  1040 . In block  1040 , the decision is made if getCorpZip is TRUE. If not, the process proceeds to the Exit function  1220 , if “YES”, the process proceeds to block  1060 , where the decision is made if getNumbersByClient (rsNumbers) is TRUE and the Count is greater than zero. If the answer is “NO”, the process proceeds to the Exit function  1220 . If “YES”, the process proceeds to block  1080 , where the decision is made to Do while NOT reNumbers.EOF. If the answer is “NO”, the process goes to Exit function  1220 . If “YES”, the process proceeds to block  1100 , where the decision is made if getZipFromPhone is TRUE. If “NO” the process proceeds to Exit function  1220 . If “YES”, the process proceeds to block  1120 , where the decision is made if getCallDetailByNumber (rsCallDetail) is TRUE and the Count is greater than zero. If the answer is “NO”, the process proceeds to the Exit function  1220 . If “YES”, the process proceeds to block  1140 , where the decision is made to Do while NOT rsCallDetail.EOF. If the answer is “NO”, the process proceeds to the getZipCodes function of block  1280 . If the answer is “YES”, the process proceeds to block  1160 , where the decision is made if getType  1180 , getWhen  1200 , or getWhere  1221  are FALSE. If the answer is “NO”, the process moves to the “rsCallDetail.MoveNext” function of block  1260 . If “YES”, the process moves to block  1240 , where totalRejectedCalls is equal to total RejectedCalls+1. The process then proceeds to block  1260 , where the function “rsCallDetail.MoveNext” is performed. Following this function, the system will again move to block  1140 , Do while NOT rsCallDetail.EOF. This process is repeated until block  1140  is “NO”, and the process proceeds to the getZipCodes function of block  1280 . 
     The getZipCodes process of block  1280 , then proceeds to a decision in block  1300  if buildProfileDic is TRUE. If “NO”, the process goes to the Exit function of block  1220 . If “YES”, the process proceeds to block  1320  where a decision is made if addProfileRecord is TRUE. If “NO”, the process proceeds to Exit function  1220 . If “YES”, the process proceeds to block  1340 , the “rsNumbers.MoveNext” function. From here, the process then returns to the decision block  1080  of do while NOT rsNumbers.EOF. 
     The getClientID process of block  1020  (FIG. 14) is depicted in FIG.  15 . The process  1020  begins with block  1021 , the Enter function, and continues to block  1022 , the function of Select ID from client where name is equal to client name. The process ends in block  1023 , the Exit function. 
     The getCorpZip process of block  1040  (FIG. 14) is depicted in FIG.  16 . The process  1040  is entered in block  1041 , and continues to block  1042 , where the postal code is selected from the address. The process ends in block  1043 , the Exit function. 
     The getNumbersByClient process of block  1060  (FIG. 14) is detailed in FIG.  17 . The process begins with block  1061 , the Enter function, and continues in block  1062 , the function Select * from Telephone for client Id. The process ends in block  1063 , the Exit function. 
     The getZipFromPhone process of block  1100  is detailed in FIG.  18 . The process  1100  begins with block  1101 , the Enter function, and continues to block  1102 , the function call twi_getZipFromPhone stored procedure. The function ends in block  1103 , the Exit function. 
     The getType process  1180  shown in block  1160  (FIG. 14) is detailed in the flowchart of FIG.  19 . The process begins in block  1181 , the Enter function, and continues in block  1182 , where the decision is made if number_called is equal to ‘000’ or ‘555’ or ‘411’ or len equals 3. If the answer of decision block  1182  is “YES”, the process moves to the Increment local call counter of block  1183 , and then exits the process in block  1184 . If the decision of block  1182  is “NO”, the process moves to the decision block  1185 . In block  1185 , the decision is made if getLataAndState for called_number and mobile_number is TRUE. If the answer is “NO”, the process moves to the Exit function block  1184 . If “YES”, the process moves to the decision block  1189 , where the decision is made if calledLATA is TollFree. If the answer is “YES”, the process proceeds to block  1183 , for an Increment of local call counter. If the answer of decision block  1189  is “NO”, the process proceeds to the decision block  1190 , where the decision If mobileLATA is equal to calledLATA. If the decision of block  1190  is “YES”, the process proceeds to the Increment local call counter block  1183 , and then the Exit function of block  1184 . If the decision of block  1190  is “NO”, the process proceeds to the decision block  1191 , where the decision is made if mobileState is equal to the calledState. If the answer of decision block  1191  is “YES”, the process proceeds to block  1192  for the Increment Intrastate counter, and then to the Exit function of block  1184 . If the decision of block  1191  is “NO”, the process proceeds to the Increment Interstate counter of block  1193 , and then to the Exit function of block  1184 . 
     The getLataAndState function of block  1185  (FIG. 19) is detailed in the flowchart of FIG.  20 . In FIG. 20, the process begins in the Enter function in block  1186 , and continues to block  1187 , the function call twi_getLataAndState store procedure. Then, the process is exited in block  1188 . 
     The getWhen function  1200  depicted in block  1160  (FIG. 14) is depicted in the flowchart of FIG.  21 . The process is entered in block  1201 , and proceeds to the decision block  1202 , if dowId is Monday. If the answer is “YES”, the process proceeds to the decision block  1203 , where the decision is made if the callTime is less than peak_start_time. If the answer of decision block  1203  is “YES”, the block  1204  Increment Weekend counter is signaled, followed by the Exit function  1205 . If the answer is “NO” to decision block  1203 , the process proceeds to the decision block  1206 , where the decision is made if Elself callTime is less than peak_end_time. If the answer is “YES”, the process proceeds to block  1207  where the Increment Peak counter is signaled, and then the process proceeds to the Exit function  1205 . If the decision is “NO” in decision block  1206 , the process proceeds to block  1208 , for the Increment OffPeak counter, and then proceeds to the Exit function of block  1205 . If the decision of block  1202  is “NO” (dowId does not equal Monday), then the process proceeds to decision block  1209 , where the decision is made if dowId is equal to Tuesday-Thursday. If the answer is “YES”, the process proceeds to decision block  1210 , where the decision is made if the callTime is less than the peak_start_time. If the answer to decision block  1210  is “YES”, the process proceeds to block  1210 , the Increment OffPeak counter, and then to Exit function of block  1205 . If the decision of block  1210  is “NO”, the process proceeds to block  1212 , the increment peak counter, and then to the Exit function of block  1205 . If the decision to block  1209  is “NO” (dowId is not equal to Tuesday-Thursday), then the process proceeds to decision block  1213 , where the decision is made if the dowId is equal to Friday. If the decision is “YES”, the process proceeds to the decision block  1214 , where the decision is made if callTime is less than peak_start_time. If “YES”, the callTime is less than the peak_start_time, then the process proceeds to block  1215 , the increment offpeak counter, and then to the Exit function  1205 . If the answer to decision block  1214  is “NO”, the process proceeds to decision block  1216 , and the decision is made if Elself callTime is less than peak_end_time. If the answer is “YES”, the process proceeds to the increment peak counter of block  1217 , and then to the Exit function of block  1205 . If the decision of block  1216  is “NO”, the process proceeds to block  1218 , the increment weekend counter, and then to the Exit function of block  1205 . If the decision of block  1213  is “NO” (the dowId does not equal Friday), then the process proceeds to the decision block  1219 , where the decision is made if Else dowId is equal to Saturday or Sunday. The decision of block  1219  is necessarily “YES”, wherein the process proceeds to block  1220 , the Increment Weekend counter, and then to the Exit function  1205 . 
     The getWhere process  1221  of block  1160  (FIG. 14) is depicted in the flowchart of FIG.  22 . The getWhere process  1221  begins with the Enter function in block  1222 , and proceeds to the decision block  1223 , where the decision is made if number_called is equal to ‘000’. If “YES”, the process proceeds to block  1224 , the Increment HomeZip counter, and then to the Exit function of block  1225 . If the decision of block  1223  is “NO”, the process proceeds to the decision block  1226 , where the decision is made if getzipFromCityState (originatingCityState) is TRUE. If the answer to decision block  1226  is “NO”, the process proceeds to the Exit function of block  1225 . If the answer to decision block  1226  is “YES”, the process proceeds to decision block  1230 , where the decision is made if retZip is equal to the homeZip. If “YES”, the process proceeds to block  1224 , the Increment HomeZip counter, and then to the Exit function of block  1225 . If the decision of block  1230  is “NO”, the process proceeds to the decision block  1231 , where the decision is made if retZip is equal to corpZip. If the answer to the decision block  1231  is “YES”, the process proceeds to block  1232 , the Increment CorpZip counter, and then to the Exit function of block  1225 . If the decision of block  1231  is “NO”, the process proceeds to block  1233 , the Add zip to zipCode dictionary, and then to the Exit function of block  1225 . 
     The getZipFromCityState process referred to in block  1226  (FIG. 22) is detailed in the flowchart of FIG.  23 . The process  1226  begins with the Enter function in block  1227 , and then proceeds to the Call twi_getZipFromCityState stored procedure command of block  1228 . The process then exits in block  1229 . 
     The getZipCodes process of  1280  of FIG. 14 is detailed in the flowchart of FIG.  24 . The getZipCodes process  1280  begins with the Enter function in block  1281 , and proceeds to the decision block of  1282 , where the decision is made if zipCode count is greater than zero. If “NO”, the process proceeds to the Exit function of bolck  1283 . If the zipCode count is greater than zero (“YES”), the process proceeds to the decision block of  1284 , wherein the decision is made If zipCode count is greater than or equal to max_us_zips. If “NO”, the process proceeds to block  1285 , the looping operation through zipArray. The zipArray may contain any number of items according to several embodiments of the invention. By way of example, in one embodiment, the zipArray contains four items. The process may either then proceed to the decision block  1291 , or continue on to block  1286 , the looping operation through zipDictionary. From block  1286 , the process can then either proceed to the decision block of  1287  or continue on to block  1290 , the function Save max zip and count. At block  1290 , the process then returns to the looping operation through zipDictionary of block  1286 . 
     If the looping operation through zipDictionary of block  1286  proceeds through the decision block of  1287 , the decision is made if the max zip and count is greater than the current zipArray item. If “NO”, the process returns to block  1285 , the looping operation through zipArray. If the answer to decision block  1287  is “YES” (max zip and count are greater than current zipArray item), then the process proceeds to block  1288 , where the max zip and count are added to zipArray. The process then proceeds to block  1289 , to remove max zip and count from dictionary. From block  1289 , the process then returns to block  1285 , the looping operation through zipArray. Once the looping operation through zipArray of block  1285  is completed, the process proceeds to the decision block  1291 , wherein the decision is made if zipDictionary count is greater than zero. If “NO”, the process then proceeds to the Exit function of block  1283 . If “YES”, the process then proceeds to roll up remaining zip dictionary items in to the first Zip Array item as instructed in block  1292 , and then proceeds to the Exit function of block  1283 . Returning to the decision block of  1284 , if “YES” (ZipCode count is greater than or equal to max_us_zips), then the process proceeds to the decision block  1293 , wherein the decision is made if testLen is greater than zero. If “NO”, the process proceeds to the Exit function of block  1283 . If “YES” (testLen is greater than zero), then the process proceeds to the function of block  1294 , and looping operation through all zipCodes in zipDictionary. 
     The loop then proceeds to block  1295 , where tempZip is equal to left(testLen) characters of zipCode. The process then proceeds to block  1296 , where the function Add tempZip and count to tempZipDictionary is performed, and then returns to the looping operation through all zipCodes in zipDictionary of block  1294 . If in block  1294  the testLen is equal to the testLen−1, the process proceeds to the Enter function of block  1281 , and the getZipCodes begins again. 
     The buildProfilesDic process of block  1300  (FIG. 14) is detailed in the flowchart of FIG.  25 . The process  1300  begins with the Enter function of block  1301 , and proceeds to the decision block  1302 , where the decision is made if total is less than any individual value. If “NO”, the process proceeds to the Exit function of block  1303 . If “YES” (total is less than any individual value), then the process proceeds to the decision block  1304 , where the decision is made if the total is greater than zero. If “NO”, the process proceeds to block  1306 , for adding default values to profile dictionary, and then to the Exit function of block  1303 . If the decision of block  1304  is “YES” (total is greater than zero), then the process proceeds to block  1305 , for adding actual values to profile dictionary, and then to the Exit function of block  1303 . 
     The addProfileRecord process of block  1320  (FIG. 14) is detailed in the flowchart of FIG.  26 . The process  1320  begins with the Enter function of block  1321 . The process then proceeds to block  1323  for inserting into the calling_profile. The process then ends with the Exit function  1324 . 
     Once the profiles are built, according to the steps detailed in the flowchart of FIGS. 14-26, the profiles are then run, as detailed in the flowchart of FIG.  27 . The runprofiler process  1400  begins with the Enter function of block  1401 , and proceeds to the function of block  1402 , of Set oProfiler=CreateObject(“TWIOptimizer.Optimator”). The process then proceeds to block  1403 , For iCount=0 to Ubound(iProfileIds). From block  1403 , the process may proceed to block  1404 , Set oProfiler=Nothing, and then to the Exit function of block  1405 . Block  1403  may also proceed to the decision block of  1406 , where the decision is made If oProfiler.DoEval is TRUE. If “NO”, the process then proceeds to the Exit function of block  1405 . If “YES” (oProfiler.DoEval is TRUE), then the process returns to block  1403 , For iCount=0 to Ubound(iProfileIds). 
     The doEval process of block  1406  (FIG. 27) is detailed in the flowchart of FIG.  28 . The doEval process  1406  begins with the Enter function of block  1410 , and proceeds to the decision block  1420 , where the decision is made If getUserProfile is NOT nothing. If “NO”, the process proceeds to the Exit function of block  1440 . If “YES” (getUserPrfile is NOT nothing), then the process proceeds to the decision block  1460 , where the decision is made If findPackages is True. If “NO”, the process proceeds to the Exit function of block  1440 . If “YES” (findpackages is True), then the process proceeds to the decision block of  1490 . In the decision block of  1490 , the decision is made If calcCosts is True. If “NO”, the process proceeds to the Exit function of block  1440 . If “YES”, the process then proceeds to block  1600  for createEvaluation, and then to the Exit function  1440 . 
     The getUserProfile process of block  1420  (FIG. 28) is described in greater detail in the flowchart of FIG.  29 . The getUserProfile process  1420  begins with the Enter function of block  1425 , proceeds to block  1430  for Clear out m_dicProfile. The process then proceeds to block  1435  for getProfile, and then to the Exit function  1440 . 
     The getProfile process of block  1435  (FIG. 29) is described in greater detail in the flowchart of FIG.  30 . The getProfile process  1435  begins with the Enter function of block  1436 , and proceeds to block  1437  for Select from calling_profile. The process then proceeds to the Exit function of block  1438 . 
     The findPackages process of block  1460  (FIG. 28) is described in greater detail in the flowchart of FIG.  31 . The findPackages process  1460  begins with the Enter function of block  1461 , and then proceeds to the decision block of  1462 , where the decision is made if profile is found. If “NO”, the process proceeds to the Exit function of block  1463 . If “YES” (profile is found), the process proceeds to block  1463  for Get home zip, and then to block  1464 , twiOptimizer.SPPackage.getPackagesByZIP, where packages are added to allPackages dictionary  1465 . The process proceeds to block  1466  where it performs the Get corp zip function, and then proceeds to the decision block of  1467 , where the decision is made if corp zip is found and corp zip is greater than or less than the home zip. If the decision of block  1467  is “NO”, the process proceeds to block  1468  for removing all items from m_dicBasePackages. The process then proceeds to block  1469  for performing the function Add all base packages form allPackages dictionary to m_dicBasePackages. The process then proceeds to block  1470  where it performs the function Add all non-base packages from allPackages dictionary to m_dicBasePackages, and then proceeds to the Exit function  1463 . If the decision of block  1467  is “YES” (corp zip is found and corp zip is greater than or less than home zip), the process proceeds to block  1464 , where it performs the function twiOptimizer.SPPackage.getPackagesByZip. The process then proceeds to block  1465  where it performs the function Add packages to allPackages dictionary. From block  1465 , the process continues on to block  1468 , where it performs the function Remove all items from m_dicBasePackages, and the process continues on until the Exit function of block  1463 . 
     The getPackagesByZIP process of block  1464  (FIG. 31) is described in greater detail in the flowchart of FIG.  32 . The getPackagesByZIP process  1464  begins with the Enter function  1471 , and proceeds to the decision block  1472 , where the decision is made if carriers count is equal to zero. If “NO”, the process proceeds to block  1474 , where rs equals getPackagesByZipAndCarrier, and then to the decision block  1475 . If the answer to the decision block  1472  is “YES” (carriers count is equal to zero), then the process proceeds to block  1474 , where rs equals getPackagesByZip. From block  1473 , the process then proceeds to the decision block  1475 , where the decision is made if rs is NOT nothing and rs.EOF is FALSE. If the answer is “NO”, the process proceeds to the Exit function of block  1476 . If the answer to the decision block  1475  is “YES” (rs is NOT nothing and rs.EOF is FALSE), then the process proceeds to block  1477 , While NOT rs.EOF. 
     From block  1477 , the process may then proceed to the Exit function of block  1476 , or it may proceed to block  1478 , where it performs the function Save rs values to newPackage. From block  1478 , the process proceeds to the decision block  1479 , where the decision is made if package type equals base or extendedLocalCalling. If “NO”, the process proceeds to the decision block of  1482 . If “YES” (package type is equal to base or extendedLocalCalling), the process then proceeds to the decision block  1480 . In the decision block  1480 , the decision is made areZips in package coverage area. If “NO”, the process then proceeds to the decision block  1482 . If “YES” (areZips in package coverage area), then the process proceeds to block  1481 , where it performs the function Add minutes to newPackage coveredZips. 
     From block  1481 , the process then proceeds to the decision block  1482 , where the decision is made is package type equal to Base. The answer to the decision block  1482  is necessarily “YES”, and the process proceeds to block  1483 , where it performs the function Add minutes for Digital and Analog Roaming. From block  1483 , the process proceeds to block  1484 , where it performs the function Save profile zip for package. 
     From block  1484 , the process proceeds to block  1485 , where it performs the function Add package to retDic. From block  1485 , the process returns again to block  1477 , and this loop is repeated until the function is rs.EOF. Then the process proceeds from block  1477  to the Exit function of block  1476 . 
     The selectCoveredZIPs process of block  1480  (FIG. 32) is described in greater detail in the flowchart of FIG.  33 . The selectCoveredZIPs function  1480  begins with the Enter function of block  1486 , and then proceeds to block  1487 , where it performs the function Call areaZIPsInPackageCoverageArea. Upon completion of the function of block  1487 , the process proceeds to the Exit function of block  1488 . 
     The calcCosts process of block  1490  (FIG. 28) is described in greater detail in the flowcharts of FIG.  34 A and FIG.  34 B. The process calcCosts  1490  begins with the Enter function of block  1491 , and proceeds to the decision block  1492 , where the decision is made if profile is found. If “NO”, the process proceeds to the Exit function of block  1493 . If “YES” (Profile is Found), the process proceeds to the function of block  1494 , For each base package, and then proceeds to the function of block  1495 , twiOptimizer.SPPackage.calcCost. 
     From block  1495 , the process proceeds to a looping operation beginning with block  1496 , for each optional package. From block  1496 , the process can either proceed directly to the Calculate minimum costs function of block  1506 , or the function of block  1495 , twiOptimizer.SPPackage.calcCost. 
     From block  1495 , the process proceeds to the decision block  1497 , where the decision is made whether package type equals longdistance. If “YES” (package type is longdistance), the process proceeds to the decision block  1498 , where the decision is made if current savings is greater than max savings. If the answer to the decision block  1498  is “NO” (current savings is not greater than max savings), the process proceeds to the decision block  1500 . If “YES” (current savings is greater than max savings), the process proceeds to the function of block  1499 , Save current savings. 
     From block  1499 , the process then proceeds to the decision block  1500 . In the decision block  1500 , the decision is made if package type is equal to offpeak, weekend, or offpeakweekend. If “YES” (package type is either offpeak, weekend, or offpeakweekend), the process proceeds to the decision block  1501 . In the decision block  1501 , the decision is made whether current savings are greater than max savings. If “NO”, the process proceeds to the decision block  1503 . If “YES” (current savings are greater than max savings), the process proceeds to the function of block  1502 , Save current savings. 
     From block  1502 , the package type then proceeds to the decision block  1503 . If the decision of block  1500  is “NO” (package type is not offpeak, weekend, or offpeakweekend), then the process proceeds to the decision block  1503 , where the decision is made if package type is equal to extendedLocalCalling. If “NO”, the process returns back to the function of block  1406 , for each optional package, and then proceeds to the function of block  1495 , twiOptimizer.SPPackage.calcCost, and the procedure is run again. If the decision of block  1503  is “YES” (package type is extendedLocalCalling), the process then proceeds to the decision block  1504 . In the decision block  1504 , the decision is made whether current savings is greater than max savings. If the answer to the decision of block  1504  is “NO”, the process returns again to the looping operation of block  1496 , and the procedure is run again for each optional package. If the answer to block  1504  is “YES” (current savings is greater than max savings), then the process proceeds to the function of block  1505 , Save current savings. 
     From block  1505 , the process then returns to block  1496 , where the procedure is repeated. Once the procedures have been calculated for each optional package of block  1496 , the process then continues on to the function of block  1506 , Calculate minimum costs. From block  1506 , the process then proceeds to the function of block  1507 , Add costs to m_dicBasePackages. From block  1507 , the process proceeds to the function of block  1508 , Use twiOptimizer.ServicePlan.GetServicePlansById to Get activation fee and add it to m_dicBasePackages. 
     From block  1508 , the process continues to the function of block  1509 , Build array of lowest cost package ids. The array may contain any number of items according to several embodiments of the invention. By way of example, in one embodiment of the invention, the array contains three items. From block  1509 , the process continues to the function of block  1510 , a looping operation through array of lowest cost package ids and set the matching packages includedInEval flag to true. From block  1510 , the process then proceeds to the Exit function of block  1493 . 
     The process for the calcCost function of block  1495  (FIG. 34) is detailed in the flowchart of FIGS. 35A and 35B. The process  1495  begins with the Enter function of block  1511 , and proceeds to the decision block of  1512 , where the decision is made if package type is equal to base. If “YES” (package is base), then the process proceeds to the function of block  1513 , Calculate peak over minutes. The process then proceeds to the function of block  1514 , Calculate off-peak over minutes, followed by the function of block  1515 , Calculate long distance (LD) minutes. 
     The process then proceeds to the function of block  1516 , Calculate roaming minutes, and then to block  1517 , Get the total roaming minutes for those profile ZIPS not in the current calling area. From block  1517 , the process proceeds to block  1518 , the function Now Calculate the corresponding costs, and then proceeds to the decision block  1519 , where the decision is made if package type is longdistance. Further, if the decision of block  1512  is “NO” (package type is not base), the process proceeds to the decision block of  1519 . If the decision of block  1519  is “NO”, the process then proceeds to the decision of block  1523 , as to whether Package type is equal to offpeak. If the decision of block  1519  is “YES” (package type is equal to longdistance), the process proceeds to the function of block  1520 , Calculate the number of minutes over the plan minutes. 
     From block  1520 , the system proceeds to block  1521 , the function Find how much this package saves against the current base package cost. Once the function of  1521  is complete, the process moves to the function  1522 , Now calculate the corresponding costs. Once the function of block  1522  is completed, the process then moves to the decision block  1523 , where the decision is made if package type is equal to offpeak. If the decision is “NO”, the process proceeds to the decision block of  1526 . If the decision of block  1523  is “YES” (package type is offpeak), then the process proceeds to the function of block  1524 , Calculate the offpeak minutes cost. 
     After the function of block  1524 , the process proceeds to the function of block  1525 , Find how much this package saves against the current base package cost. Upon completion of the function  1525 , the process then proceeds to the decision block of  1526 , where the decision is made if package type is equal to weekend. If “NO”, the process proceeds to the decision block  1529 . If the decision of block  1526  is “YES” (package type is weekend), then the process proceeds to the function of block  1527 , Calculate the weekend minutes cost. Upon the completion of the function of block  1527 , the process proceeds to the function of block  1528 , Find how much this package saves against the current base package cost. Upon completion of the function of block  1528 , the process will then proceed to the decision block  1529 , where the decision is made if package type is equal to offpeak weekend. If “NO”, the process proceeds to the decision block  1532 . If the decision of block  1529  is “YES” (package type is offpeak weekend), then the process proceeds to the function of block  1530 , Calculate the offpeak minutes cost. 
     Upon completion of the function of block  1530 , the process continues to the function of block  1531 , Find how much this package saves against the current base package cost. Upon completion of this function, the process then proceeds to the decision block  1532 , where the decision is made if package type is equal to extended local calling. If “NO”, the process then proceeds to the Exit function of block  1535 . If the decision of block  1532  is “YES” (package is extended local calling), then the process proceeds to the function of block  1533 , Calculate the extended local calling minutes cost. After the function of block  1533 , the process continues to the function of block  1534 , Find how much this package saves against the current base package cost. The process then proceeds to the Exit function  1535 . 
     The getServicePlanByID process of block  1508  (FIG. 34) is detailed in the flowchart of FIG.  36 . The getServicePlanByID process  1508  begins with the Enter function of block  1535 , and proceeds to the function of block  1536 , rs equals getServicePlanByID. The process then proceeds to the decision block  1537 , where the decision is made if NOT rs is nothing and NOT rs.EOF. If “NO”, the process proceeds to the Exit function of block  1538 . If “YES” (NOT rs is nothing and NOT rs.EOF), then the process continues to the function of block  1539 , Save rs to serviceplan object. From block  1539 , the process then proceeds to the Exit function of block  1538 . 
     The createEvaluation function of block  1600  (FIG. 28) is detailed in the flowchart of FIG.  37 . The process createEvaluation  1600  begins with the Enter function of block  1601 , proceeds to the function of block  1620 , putEvaluation, and then finishes with the Exit function of block  1640 . 
     The putEvaluation process of block  1620  (FIG. 37) is detailed in the flowchart of FIG.  38 . The process putEvalution  1620  begins with the Enter function  1621 , proceeds to the function of block  1622 , Insert in to rate plan evaluation, and then proceeds to the function of block  1623 , a looping operation through base packages. The process then proceeds to the decision block  1624 , where the decision is made if includedInEval is TRUE. If “NO”, the process then proceeds to the next base package, as depicted in block  1625 . 
     From block  1625 , the process then returns to the looping operation base packages of block  1623 . If the decision of block  1624  is “YES” (includedInEval is TRUE), then the process proceeds to the function of block  1627 , Insert in to service plan instance. The process then proceeds to the function of block  1628 , Insert in to SPI_RPE_LINK, before proceeding to the function of block  1629 , Insert in to package instance. The process then continues to the function of block  1630 , the looping operation through optional packages. In the looping operation, the process proceeds to the decision block  1631 , where the decision is made if package selected is True. If “NO”, the looping operation then goes directly to the next optional package, as shown in block  1633 , before returning through to the looping operation through optional packages of block  1630 . If the decision of block  1631  is “YES” (if package selected is True), then the process proceeds to the function of block  1632 , Insert in to package instance, and then to the function of block  1633  for the next optional package. 
     Once the looping operation is completed, the process then proceeds from block  1633  to the function of block  1625  for the next base package, which is part of the looping operation through based packages as depicted in block  1623 . Once the looping operation through base packages is complete, the process then moves from block  1625  to the Exit function of block  1626 . 
     The calling profiles may be averaged by client or account. The avgProvilesByClient process  1700  is depicted in the flowchart of FIG.  39 . The avgProfilesByClient process  1700  begins with the Enter function of block  1701 , and proceeds to the decision block  1702 , where the decision is made if getClientId is TRUE. If “NO”, the process then proceeds to the Exit function of block  1703 . If “YES” (getclientId is TRUE), then the process proceeds to the decision block  1704 . In block  1704 , the decision is made If getNumbersByClient (rsNumbers) is TRUE and count is greater than zero. If “NO”, the process proceeds to the Exit function of block  1703 . If “YES” (getNumbersByClient (rsNumbers) is TRUE and count is greater than zero), the process proceeds to the decision block  1705 , where the decision is made Do While NOT rsNumbers.EOF. If “NO”, the process proceeds to the Exit function of block  1703 . If “YES” (NOT rsNumbers.EOF), then the process proceeds to the decision block  1706 . 
     The decision is made in block  1706  if avgProfilesByAccount is TRUE. If “NO”, the process proceeds to the Exit function of block  1703 . If “YES” (avgProfilesByAccount is TRUE), the process proceeds to the function of block  1707 , rsNumbers.MoveNext. From the function of block  1707 , the process then returns to the decision block  1705 , and is repeated while NOT rsNumbers.EOF. The getclientId function of block  1702  has been previously described and is depicted in process  1020  (FIG.  15 ). The getNumbersByClient function of block  1704  has been previously described and is depicted in the flowchart of process  1060  (FIG.  17 ). 
     The avgProfilesByAccount process  1706  (FIG.  39 ), is depicted in the flowchart of FIG.  40 . The avgProfilesByAccount process  1706  begins with the Enter function shown in block  1750 . The process then proceeds to the decision block  1760 , where the decision is made if getProfileRecords (rsProfiles) is TRUE and the count is greater than zero. If “NO”, the process proceeds to the Exit function of block  1770 . If “YES” (getProfileRecords is TRUE and count is greater than zero), then the process proceeds to the decision block  1780 , a Do while NOT rsProfiles.EOF function. If “NO”, the process proceeds to the getZipCodes function of block  1820 . If “YES” (NOT rsProfiles.EOF), then the process proceeds to the decision block  1790 . In the decision block  1790 , the decision is made if homeZip is the same. If “NO”, the process proceeds to the getZipCodes function of block  1820 . If “YES” (homeZip is the same), then the process proceeds to the function of block  1800 , Sum all call values. 
     From block  1800 , the process then continues to the function of block  1810 , iPeriods equals iPeriods plus 1. The process then returns to the function Do while NOT rsProfiles.EOF of block  1780 . Once the block  1780  is “NO”, and leads to the getZipCodes function of block  1820 , the process then continues to the decision block  1830 . The decision is made in block  1830  if iPeriods is greater than zero. If “NO”, the process proceeds to the Exit function of block  1770 . If “YES” (iPeriods is greater than zero), then the process continues to the function of block  1840 , Average all sums. The process then continues to the Build profile dictionary function of block  1300 . The Build profile dictionary function is depicted in process  1300  (FIG.  25 ). The process then continues to the addProfileRecord of block  1320  (FIG.  26 ), before proceeding to the Exit function of block  1770 . 
     The getProfileRecords process of block  1760  is depicted in greater detail in the flowchart of FIG.  41 . The getProfileRecords process  1760  begins with the Enter function  1761 , proceeds to the Call twi_getProfileRecords stored procedure of block  1762 , and then finishes with the Exit function of block  1763 . 
     It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments of the present invention, particularly, any “preferred” embodiments, are merely possible examples of implementations, merely set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the invention. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiment(s) of the invention without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the invention. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and the present invention and protected by the following claims.

Technology Classification (CPC): 7