Patent Abstract:
A process has been described which makes use of polysilicon beam as the structural material instead of single crystal silicon for the fabrication of MEMS sensors/actuators. The invention describes the process for fabricating suspended polysilicon beams by using deep trenches etched into silicon substrate as a kind of a mould to form polysilicon beams. The polysilicon beams are subsequently released by isotropically etching away the silicon surrounding the polysilicon beams. This results in free standing polysilicon members, which form the MEMS structures. In addition to the general process, three approaches to making electrical contact to the beams are presented.

Full Description:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
     The invention relates to the general field of MEMS structures with particular reference to cantilever beams. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     MEMS (micro electromechanical systems) sensors and actuators, such as accelerometers, pressure sensors, and gyroscopes are manufactured using either a bulk micromachining process or a surface micromachining process. “Bulk” micromachining refers to structures formed by deep anisotropic etching. “Surface” micromachining refers to structures formed from thin film layers deposited or grown on the surface of a substrate. Surface micromachining has advantages over the previous bulk micromachining process of fabricating IC sensors and actuators because it permits smaller devices and may be integrated with other circuits on an IC (integrated circuit). One form of bulk micro-machining typically involves etching in a silicon substrate deep trenches between 10 microns to 100 microns deep. The resulting silicon structures (called “beams”) are partially released (i.e., detached) from the silicon substrate by known processes such as wet or dry etching. This deep trench technology is described, for example, in Klaassen, et al. “Fusion Bonding and Deep Reactive Ion Etching: A New Technology for Microstructures”, Transducers &#39;95, Stockholm, Sweden, 1995. The contents of this article are incorporated herein by reference. 
     A variety of methods that have been discussed in the literature have been devised for fabricating micromachined structures such as accelerometers. However, most such processes require multiple masking steps, wafer-to-wafer bonding, or the use of wet chemistry. It has been found, however, that the use of such multiple masks and bonding techniques can introduce alignment errors, which reduce yield and increase device cost, making such processes unsuitable for submicron structures. 
     A routine search of the prior art was performed with the following references of interest being found: 
     U.S. Pat. No. 5,930,595 (Isolation process for surface micromachined sensors and actuators) discusses a method of fabricating MEMS sensors/actuators using a process wherein deep trenches are etched and released beams formed by using oxide spacer to protect beam sidewall. The key feature of this patent is that it provides a novel method of forming trenches which are filled with isolation oxide so as to form silicon islands on three sides while the fourth side is connected to the sensor/actuator beams. Recently, another patent application has been filed in IME, namely, “A High Aspect Ratio Trench Isolation Process for Surface Micromachined Sensor and Actuators (PAT00-005/MEMS001)” which uses a novel process to form an isolation island that can be used in fabrication of MEMS sensors/actuators. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,343 describes a method of fabricating accelerometers utilizing a modified version of the Single Crystal Reactive Etching. And Metallization (SCREAM) process which is also described in U.S. application Ser. No. 08/013,319, filed Feb. 5, 1993. As stated in that application, the SCREAM-I process is a single mask, single wafer, dry etch process which uses optical lithography for fabricating submicron micro-electromechanical devices. In that process, a silicon dioxide layer is deposited on a single crystal silicon wafer, this oxide layer serving as the single etch mask throughout the process. Photolithography is used to pattern a resist, and then dry etching, such as magnetron ion etching, is used to transfer the pattern of the accelerometer structure into the oxide. Once the resist material is removed, the patterned oxide masks the silicon substrate to allow a deep vertical silicon RIE (reactive ion etching) on exposed surfaces to produce trenches having predominately vertical side walls and which define the desired structure. 
     Next, a conformal coating of PECVD oxide is deposited for protecting the side walls of the trenches during the following release etch. The trench bottom oxide is removed within an isotropic RIE, and a second deep silicon trench etch deepens the trenches to expose the sidewall silicon underneath the deposited side wall oxide. The exposed silicon underneath the defined structure is etched away, using an isotropic dry etch such as an SF6 etch to release the structure and leave cantilevered beams and fingers over the remaining substrate. In the SCREAM-I process, aluminium is deposited by sputtering to coat the sidewall of the released beams and fingers to thereby form the capacitor plates for the accelerometer. 
     In U.S. Pat. No. 6,035,714, a high sensitivity, Z-axis capacitive micro-accelerometer having stiff sense/feedback electrodes and a method of its manufacture are provided. The micro-accelerometer is manufactured out of a single silicon wafer and has a sili-con-wafer-thick proofmass, small and controllable damping, large capacitance variation and can be operated in a force-rebalanced control loop. The multiple stiffened electrodes have embedded therein-amping holes to facilitate both force-rebalanced operation of the device and controlling of the damping factor. Using the whole silicon wafer to form the thick large proofmass and using the thin sacrificial layer to form a narrow uniform capacitor air gap over a large area provide large capacitance sensitivity. The structure of the micro-accelerometer is symmetric and thus results in low cross-axis sensitivity. 
     In U.S. Pat. No. 5,660,680, a method of forming polysilicon structures using silicon trenches with partially trench-filled oxide as molds has been described. The oxide layer acts as the sacrificial layer to release the polysilicon structures. 
     BOSCH Polysilicon (Epi-poly) process: This process makes use of thick epitaxial polysilicon (20-30 microns) grown on a silicon substrate. This poly layer is then used in forming beams of various depths for forming MEMS structures. This process uses an epi reactor and hence is quite expensive. For thick poly, residual stress is still a potential issue. 
     Additional references of interest were: 
     U.S. Pat. No. 6,133,670 (Rodgers) shows a poly beam (finger) in a MEMS device. In U.S. Pat. No. 6,175,170 B1, Kota et al. show another poly finger MEMS device and process while, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,171,881 B1, Fujii shows another MEMS device. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     It has been an object of the present invention to provide a cost-effective process for manufacturing IC sensors and/or actuators that completely electrically isolates the sensor beams from the substrate that supports them. 
     Another object of the present invention has been to provide a process for manufacturing IC sensors and/or actuators that have low parasitic capacitance. 
     Yet another object of the present invention has been to provide a process for manufacturing IC sensors and/or actuators that is compatible with CMOS processes. 
     These objects have been achieved by providing a process which makes use of polysilicon beam as the structural material instead of single crystal silicon for the fabrication of MEMS sensors/actuators. The invention describes the process for fabricating suspended polysilicon beams by using deep trenches etched into silicon substrate as molds to form polysilicon beams. The polysilicon beams are subsequently released by isotropically etching away the silicon surrounding the polysilicon beams. This results in free standing polysilicon members, which form the MEMS structures. In addition to the general process, three approaches to making electrical contact to the beams are presented. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     FIGS. 1-4 illustrate how trenches may be etched, lined with insulation and then filled with polysilicon. 
     FIGS. 5 and 6 illustrate how a mask is used to etch a cavity around the filled trenches. 
     FIGS. 7 and 8 are cross-sectional views of the cantilever beams that are formed after the pedestals are released from the cavity floor. 
     FIG. 9 is a plan view of which FIG. 8 is a cross-section. 
     FIG. 10 illustrates the first of three embodiments that teach how electrical contact may be made to the cantilever beams. 
     FIGS. 11 and 12 show two steps in implementing the second of three embodiments that teach how electrical contact may be made to the cantilever beams. 
     FIG. 13 illustrates the last of the three embodiments that teach how electrical contact may be made to the cantilever beams. 
     FIGS. 14-15 illustrate the formation of the busbar island area. 
     FIG. 16 is a plan view of three silicon beams connected through a busbar mask. 
     FIGS. 17-19 illustrate steps in the formation of the busbar island mask. 
     FIG. 20 illustrates beam release within the busbar island area. 
     FIG. 21 shows how space between the beams of FIG. 20 gets filled with oxide. 
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     Most of the prior art described above make use of a deep trench etch process to define the beams and subsequently release the silicon beams while using oxide spacers to protect the sidewalls. This press has the following limitations: 
     It is difficult to get a conformal spacer layer for high aspect ratio trenches (&gt;20). This makes it difficult to protect beam sidewalls during pre-release and final release etch. This makes the beam sidewall very irregular due to ‘mouse bites’ at these sites. In order to solve this problem, thicker spacer oxide is deposited. This in turn compels designers to widen the trench openings thus reducing the sensitivity of the actuator/sensor. 
     The release etch process after releasing the beams, further erodes the beam thus reducing the beam depth. This results in Joss of beam depth across the wafer. The sidewall spacer also hangs like a tail where the beams have been encroached. This oxide tails act as a potential sources of contamination due to their flimsy nature. During operation they may even break off and be redeposited between the sensing fingers, causing devices to behave unpredictably. 
     In the case of the SCREAM process, a metal layer is deposited over the beams to make the sensor/actuator beams conductive. However, it is not possible to get conformal aluminum deposition inside deep trenches. 
     We now provide a detailed description of the process of the present invention, presented as four embodiments thereof: 
     1 st  Embodiment (general process) 
     Referring to FIG. 1 we show there a schematic cross-section of solid body  11  (preferably, but not necessarily, of silicon, with other possibilities including other semiconductors and metals such as aluminum, copper, gold, etc. in which deep trenches such as  12  have been etched to a depth between about 60 and 70 microns. As shown in FIG. 2, the floors and sidewalls of these trenches are then coated with a layer of an insulating material  21  which could be any of several possible materials such as silicon oxide, silicon nitride, etc., with silicon oxide being preferred. 
     The trenches are then just filled (by overfilling and then planarizing) with one or more layers of conductive material. Although only a single conductive filling material such as polysilicon, aluminum, copper, gold, etc. could be used, our preferred process has been to first under-fill with low resistivity (achieved by doping with phosphorus oxychloride) polysilicon layer  31  followed by overfilling with polysilicon layer  32 , as shown in FIG.  3 . Layer  31  of polysilicon is deposited to a stress level that is below about −1×10 8  dynes per sq. cm while the second layer of polysilicon is deposited to a stress level that is below this. The first deposited layer of polysilicon had a resistivity between about 10 and 12 ohm-cm while the second layer of polysilicon had a resistivity between about 11 and 13 ohm-cm, after an annealing cycle to distribute the phosphorus uniformly across the thickness of the polysilicon. 
     It is also possible, in principle to fill the trenches with a magnetic material for use in, for example, detecting and measuring magnetic fields. In general, filling of the trenches with conductive material may be implemented using any of the known methods for doing so, including chemical vapor deposition, physical vapor deposition, and electroplating. 
     The next step, as illustrated in FIG. 4, is the deposition of insulating layer  41  over the entire surface. A mask  51  is then formed on the surface of layer  41 . This mask serves to protect the filled trenches  31 / 32  as well as to define an opening, said opening being disposed so that the filled trenches lie partly inside and partly outside it. Then, through mask  51 , conductive body  11  is etched to form a cavity  61  (see FIG. 6) that extends downwards to a depth between about 75 and 80 microns so that it is greater than the depth of the filled trenches, resulting in the formation of pedestals. 
     With mask still in place, all exposed conductive material is removed, using a release etch, which results in the formation of cantilever beams  71 , as shown in FIG. 7 (seen following the removal of mask  51 ). This is followed by the selective removal of all exposed insulating material as shown in FIG.  8 . FIG. 9 is a plan view, with FIG. 8 being a cross-section made through  8 — 8 . As can be seen in this example, four cantilever beams  31 / 32  extend away from conductive body  11  and are suspended within cavity  61 . They are physically embedded in conductive body  11  but are electrically insulated from it by insulating layer  21 . 
     Three different ways of then making electrical contact to the beam are the basis for the next three embodiments: 
     2 nd  Embodiment (busbar island formation) 
     This embodiment uses the general process of the first embodiment with the following additional steps: 
     We refer now to FIG. 14 which is a plan view of the cross-section shown in FIG.  18 . Prior to starting the general process, layer of silicon oxide  97  (see FIG. 18) is deposited on the upper surface to a thickness between about 2 and 3 microns and then patterned to form a busbar island mask. Silicon substrate  11  is then etched to form trenches  98  to a depth between about 60 and 70 microns. 
     Layer of silicon oxide  96  (5-7,000 Å thick) is deposited and then etched-back using RIE as shown in FIGS. 18 and. Using an isotropic release etch silicon beam  99  is released to form the suspended silicon beams  100  as shown in FIGS. 20 and 21. 
     Later, silicon oxide is deposited to fill the trenches as shown in FIGS. 15 and 16. Using contact mask  102  and metal mask  103 , an electrical connection is made between the interconnect metal and busbar silicon  100  on polysilicon beam  31 / 32  as seen in FIGS. 10 and 16. 
     Finally, mask  51  is opened to etch silicon that is surrounding the polysilicon beams to form cavity  61  as shown in FIGS. 5 to  7 . 
     3 rd  Embodiment (liner oxide isolation) 
     This embodiment uses the general process of the first embodiment with the following additional steps: 
     Referring now to plan view FIG. 11, at the time of forming the trenches that are to act as molds for the cantilever beams, an additional trench  111  is formed. This trench touches the other trenches (three in this example) and is at right angles to them. When cavity  61  is formed it is positioned so that trench  111  lies outside the opening  61  while trenches  31 / 32  lie entirely inside the opening (see FIG.  12 ). The liner oxide of the first embodiment is used as electrical insulation between the polysilicon inside trench  111  and silicon substrate  11 . Liner oxide  21  is shown in FIGS. 11 and 12. After depositing oxide layer  41 , as shown in FIG. 4, a contact window is opened on the polysilicon  111 . Later, metall is deposited and patterned ( 103 ) as shown in FIG.  10 . Finally, mask  51  is etched and silicon surrounding polysilicon beams  31 / 32  is etched to form  61 , as shown in FIGS. 7 and 8. 
     4 th  Embodiment (oxide bar lateral isolation) 
     This embodiment uses the general process of the first embodiment but begins with the formation of a single trench to a depth between about 60 and 70 microns that is then just filled with silicon oxide. This is shown in FIG. 13 as trench  131 . In a similar manner to the third embodiment, one or more trenches  31 / 32  that run at right angles to the oxide filled trench are then formed, as shown in FIG.  13 . These touch the oxide filled trench and are used for the formation of the polysilicon beams as in all the previous embodiments. Before the lafter are formed, a metallic contact pad  132  that lies on trench  131  is formed. Said pad has ‘fingers’ that extend outwards part way along each beam&#39;s top surface in order to make electrical contact. 
     The four embodiments described above have been found to exhibit the following characteristics: 
     Compressive stress for low stress polysilicon after deposition was about −1.28×10 8  dynes/cm 2 . After POCl 3  doping, the second polysilicon deposition, and a final anneal, it dropped to about −2.69×10 7  dynes/cm 2 . The sheet resistance of the polysilicon after anneal was about 12.97 ohms/square. 
     In summary, the invention that we have described above offers the following advantages over the prior art: 
     (i) It is possible to achieve deep polysilicon beams with low residual stress as the polysilicon beams are formed by folding the film vertically. 
     (ii) Very large thicknesses of polysilicon beams can be achieved by depositing only between 1 to 3 micron thick polysilicon films. This results in low cost of production. In contrast, thick polysilicon beams have been traditionally achieved by thick depositions and etching the polysilicon away from the required structures (see, for example, the Bosch process). 
     (iii) Beam depth is uniform across the wafer as the beams are formed from a silicon mold. 
     (iv) No spacer oxide-tail issue arises in this process, as compared to the SCREAM or LISA processes. The present invention is CMOS compatible and hence can be integrated with a CMOS processes. 
     While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Technology Classification (CPC): 1