Patent Abstract:
The present application is directed towards methods and systems for providing anonymous and traceable external access to internal linguistic assets. The methods and systems described allow users the freedom to use a linguistic resource with the security that their identities and interactions with the resource are shielded from other users. Simultaneously, the system maintains a mechanism to trace all user&#39;s interactions with a resource to ensure the integrity of the asset is not jeopardized and to easily identify a problem with a user&#39;s access without broadcasting their identity or actions.

Full Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     This application is a national phase application of International Application No. PCT/US2010/054173, filed Oct. 26, 2010, which claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/254,769, filed Oct. 26, 2009, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. 
    
    
     FIELD OF INVENTION 
     The present invention relates to methods and systems for providing computer-aided language translations. In particular, the present invention relates to systems and methods for providing anonymous and traceable external access to internal linguistic assets. 
     BACKGROUND 
     In many available translation systems, linguistic assets have become more sophisticated and refined over time and incorporate local colloquialisms and to mirror spoken language. In some cases, linguistics assets, such as databases or translation mechanisms, are large and cannot be locally downloaded without jeopardizing the integrity of the asset. The solution is often to store the asset on a server so that the resource can be updated regularly and grow without overwhelming a user&#39;s machine or consume all the resources of a user&#39;s computer. A benefit to centrally stored translation resources is that it can be accessed by multiple individuals or parties. It becomes necessary to ensure the correct permissions are set to assets so that they are not denigrated. One problem that arises when assets are centrally stored and accessed by many parties is that the users may be able to identify the other parties who also access the resource. This may cause problems in business situations where parties wish to remain anonymous to other users or need to have access, limited or otherwise, to resources but do not wish to broadcast their identity. However, it is also necessary to have a mechanism to trace access of users to maintain the integrity of a translation resource. 
     BRIEF SUMMARY 
     The present application is directed towards methods and systems for providing anonymous and traceable external access to internal linguistic assets. The methods and systems described allow users the freedom to use a linguistic resource with the security that their identities and interactions with the resource are shielded from other users. Simultaneously, the system maintains a mechanism to trace all user&#39;s interactions with a resource to ensure the integrity of the asset is not jeopardized and to easily identify a problem with a user&#39;s access without broadcasting their identity or actions. 
     In one aspect, the present invention relates to a method for providing anonymous and traceable access to linguistic assets. A first workspace grants to a first client responsive to a first user request, access to a linguistic asset residing in the first workspace. The first workspace generates an alias token and transmits the alias token to a second client. The second workspace grants to a second client responsive to a second user request, access to the second workspace. The first workspace grants to the second workspace access to the first workspace. The second workspace then generates an aliased object for the linguistic asset residing in the first workspace. The aliased object is generated using the received alias token and is stored in the second workspace. The aliased object conceals an identity of a user having access to the linguistic asset. The second client accesses via the aliased object in the second workspace the linguistic asset. The aliased object grants the second client access to the linguistic asset residing in the first workspace. 
     In some embodiments, the linguistic asset may be a translation memory or a glossary asset. In some embodiments, the first workspace and the second workspace reside on a first server. In some embodiments, the first workspace resides on a first server and the second workspace resides on a second server. In some embodiments, the second workspace stores with the linguistic asset a group identity of a user having access to the second workspace modifying the linguistic asset. In some embodiments, the second workspace stores a group identity of a user having access to the second workspace and re-transmitting the alias token. 
     In some embodiments, the second workspace grants to a third workspace access to the second workspace. The second workspace generates a second alias token for the aliased object and storing the second aliased object in the third workspace. The second aliased object conceals an identity of a user having access to the third workspace. The second workspace transmits to a third client, the second alias token. The third workspace generates a second aliased object for the first aliased object residing in the second workspace using the received second alias token and stores the second aliased object in the third workspace. The second aliased object grants the third client access to the linguistic asset residing in the first workspace via the aliased object. 
     In some embodiments, the third workspace stores with the linguistic asset a group identity of a user having access to the second workspace modifying the linguistic asset. In some embodiments, the third workspace stores a group identity of a user having access to the second workspace and re-transmitting the alias token. In some embodiments, the second workspace stores only the group identity of a user who generated the aliased object using the alias token. 
     In another aspect, the present invention is directed to a system for providing anonymous and traceable access to linguistic assets. The system includes a first client device, a second client device, and a server. The server provides a first workspace and a second workspace. The alias manager executing in the first workspace generates an alias token for a linguistic asset and transmits the alias token to the second client. The access manager executing in the first workspace grants to the first client responsive to a first user request, access to the linguistic asset residing in the first workspace. The access manager in the first workspace also grants to the second workspace access to the first workspace. A second access manager executing in the second workspace grants to the second client responsive to a second user request, access to the second workspace. A second alias manager executing in the second workspace generates an aliased object for the linguistic asset residing in the first workspace using the received alias token and storing the aliased object in the second workspace. The aliased object conceals an identity of a user having access to the linguistic asset. The aliased object grants the second client access to the linguistic asset residing in the first workspace. 
     In some embodiments, the second workspace stores with the linguistic asset a group identity of a user having access to the second workspace modifying the linguistic asset. In some embodiments, the second workspace stores a group identity of a user having access to the second workspace and re-transmitting the alias token. In some embodiments, the third workspace resides on the server of the first workspace and the second workspace. In some embodiments, the third workspace resides on a second server. 
     In some embodiments, the second workspace grants access to a third workspace to the second workspace. A third alias manager executing in the third workspace generates a second alias token for the aliased object responsive to a request from a third client and stores the second aliased object in the third workspace. The second aliased object conceals an identity of a user having access to the third workspace. The third client receives the second alias token. The third workspace generates a second aliased object for the first aliased object residing in the second workspace using the received second alias token and stores the second aliased object in the third workspace. The second aliased object grants the third client access to the linguistic asset residing in the first workspace via the aliased object. 
     In some embodiments, the third workspace stores with the linguistic asset a group identity of a user having access to the second workspace modifying the linguistic asset. In some embodiments, the third workspace stores a group identity of a user having access to the second workspace and re-transmitting the alias token. In some embodiments, the second workspace stores only the group identity of a user who generated the aliased object using the alias token. 
     The details of various embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS 
       The foregoing and other objects, aspects, features, and advantages of the invention will become more apparent and better understood by referring to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which: 
         FIG. 1A  is a block diagram depicting an embodiment of a network environment comprising local machines in communication with remote machines; 
         FIG. 1B  is a block diagram depicting one embodiment of a computing device useful in connection with the methods and systems described herein; 
         FIG. 2A  is a block diagram depicting an embodiment of a system for providing anonymous and traceable access to assets; 
         FIG. 2B  is a block diagram depicting another embodiment of a system for providing anonymous and traceable access to assets; 
         FIG. 2C  is a block diagram depicting another embodiment of a system for providing anonymous and traceable access to assets; 
         FIG. 3  is a block diagram depicting one embodiment of methods and systems for providing anonymous and traceable external access to internal linguistic assets. 
         FIG. 4A  is a screen shot depicting one embodiment of a user interface allowing a user to create and share an alias; 
         FIG. 4B  is a screen shot depicting one embodiment of a user interface allowing a user to publish a new alias for a translation memory object; 
         FIG. 4C  is a screen shot depicting one embodiment of a user interface confirming generation of a new token; 
         FIG. 4D  is a screen shot depicting one embodiment of a user interface confirming completion of a publication of an alias; 
         FIG. 4E  is a screen shot depicting one embodiment of a user interface allowing a user to modify the access rights of a recipient of an alias for a translation memory object; 
         FIG. 4F  is a screen shot depicting one embodiment of a user interface allowing a user to modify the access rights of a recipient of an alias for a glossary object; 
         FIG. 4G  is a screen shot depicting one embodiment of a user interface allowing a user to modify the access rights of a recipient of an alias for a review object; 
         FIG. 5A  is a screen shot depicting one embodiment of a graphical representation of an object for which a user has created an alias; 
         FIG. 5B  is a screen shot depicting one embodiment of a user interface identifying a token for which an alias has been generated and published; 
         FIG. 5C  is a screen shot depicting one embodiment of a user interface displaying an identification of an organization receiving access to a published alias; 
         FIG. 6A  is a screen shot depicting one embodiment of a user interface for making a received alias available for a user of a receiving organization; 
         FIG. 6B  is a screen shot depicting one embodiment of a user interface allowing a user of a receiving organization to generate a new alias; 
         FIG. 6C  is a screen shot depicting one embodiment of a graphical representation of an alias; and 
         FIG. 7  is a flow diagram of a method for providing anonymous and traceable external access to internal linguistic assets. 
     
    
    
     The features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings, in which like reference characters identify corresponding elements throughout. In the drawings, like reference numbers generally indicate identical, functionally similar, and/or structurally similar elements. 
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     Prior to discussing the specifics of embodiments of the systems and methods for providing anonymous and traceable access to internal assets, it may be helpful to discuss the network and computing environments in which such embodiments may be deployed. Referring now to  FIG. 1A , an embodiment of a network environment is depicted. In brief overview, the network environment comprises one or more clients  102   a - 102   n  (also generally referred to as local machine(s)  102 , or client(s)  102 ) in communication with one or more servers  106   a - 106   n  (also generally referred to as server(s)  106 , or remote machine(s)  106 ) via one or more networks  104 . 
     The servers  106  may be geographically dispersed from each other or from the clients  102  and communicate over a network  104 . The network  104  can be a local-area network (LAN), such as a company Intranet, a metropolitan area network (MAN), or a wide area network (WAN), such as the Internet or the World Wide Web. The network  104  may be any type and/or form of network and may include any of the following: a point to point network, a broadcast network, a wide area network, a local area network, a telecommunications network, a data communication network, a computer network, an ATM (Asynchronous Transfer Mode) network, a SONET (Synchronous Optical Network) network, a SDH (Synchronous Digital Hierarchy) network, a wireless network and a wireline network. In some embodiments, the network  104  may comprise a wireless link, such as an infrared channel or satellite band. The topology of the network  104  may be a bus, star, or ring network topology. The network  104  and network topology may be of any such network or network topology as known to those ordinarily skilled in the art capable of supporting the operations described herein. The network may comprise mobile telephone networks utilizing any protocol or protocols used to communicate among mobile devices, including AMPS, TDMA, CDMA, GSM, GPRS or UMTS. In some embodiments, different types of data may be transmitted via different protocols. In other embodiments, the same types of data may be transmitted via different protocols. 
     In some embodiments, the system may include multiple, logically-grouped servers  106 . In one of these embodiments, the logical group of servers may be referred to as a server farm  38 . In another of these embodiments, the servers  106  may be geographically dispersed. In other embodiments, a server farm  38  may be administered as a single entity. In still other embodiments, the server farm  38  comprises a plurality of server farms  38 . The servers  106  within each server farm  38  can be heterogeneous—one or more of the servers  106  can operate according to one type of operating system platform (e.g., WINDOWS NT, WINDOWS 2003, WINDOWS 2008, manufactured by Microsoft Corp. of Redmond, Wash.), while one or more of the other servers  106  can operate on according to another type of operating system platform (e.g., Unix or Linux). 
     The servers  106  of each server farm  38  do not need to be physically proximate to another server  106  in the same server farm  38 . Thus, the group of servers  106  logically grouped as a server farm  38  may be interconnected using a wide-area network (WAN) connection or a metropolitan-area network (MAN) connection. For example, a server farm  38  may include servers  106  physically located in different continents or different regions of a continent, country, state, city, campus, or room. Data transmission speeds between servers  106  in the server farm  38  can be increased if the servers  106  are connected using a local-area network (LAN) connection or some form of direct connection. 
     A server  106  may be referred to as a file server, application server, web server, proxy server, or gateway server. In one embodiment, the server  106  provides functionality of a web server. In some embodiments, the web server  106  comprises an open-source web server, such as the APACHE servers maintained by the Apache Software Foundation of Delaware. In other embodiments, the web server executes proprietary software, such as the Internet Information Services products provided by Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash., the SUN JAVA web server products provided by Sun Microsystems, of Santa Clara, Calif., or the BEA WEBLOGIC products provided by BEA Systems, of Santa Clara, Calif. 
     The clients  102  may be referred to as client nodes, client machines, endpoint nodes, or endpoints. In some embodiments, a client  102  has the capacity to function as both a client node seeking access to resources provided by a server and as a server providing access to hosted resources for other clients  102   a - 102   n . A client  102  may execute, operate or otherwise provide an application, which can be any type and/or form of software, program, or executable instructions such as any type and/or form of web browser, web-based client, client-server application, an ActiveX control, or a Java applet, or any other type and/or form of executable instructions capable of executing on client  102 . The application can use any type of protocol and it can be, for example, an HTTP client, an FTP client, an Oscar client, or a Telnet client. 
     The client  102  and server  106  may be deployed as and/or executed on any type and form of computing device, such as a computer, network device or appliance capable of communicating on any type and form of network and performing the operations described herein.  FIG. 1B  depicts a block diagram of a computing device  100  useful for practicing an embodiment of the client  102  or a server  106 . As shown in  FIG. 1B , each computing device  100  includes a central processing unit  121 , and a main memory unit  122 . As shown in  FIG. 1B , a computing device  100  may include a visual display device  124 , a keyboard  126  and/or a pointing device  127 , such as a mouse. 
     The central processing unit  121  is any logic circuitry that responds to and processes instructions fetched from the main memory unit  122 . In many embodiments, the central processing unit is provided by a microprocessor unit, such as: those manufactured by Intel Corporation of Mountain View, Calif.; those manufactured by Motorola Corporation of Schaumburg, Ill.; those manufactured by Transmeta Corporation of Santa Clara, Calif.; the RS/6000 processor, those manufactured by International Business Machines of White Plains, N.Y.; or those manufactured by Advanced Micro Devices of Sunnyvale, Calif. The computing device  100  may be based on any of these processors, or any other processor capable of operating as described herein. 
     A wide variety of I/O devices  130   a - 130   n  may be present in the computing device  100 . Input devices include keyboards, mice, trackpads, trackballs, microphones, and drawing tablets. Output devices include video displays, loudspeakers, inkjet printers, laser printers, and dye-sublimation printers. The I/O devices may be controlled by an I/O controller  123  as shown in  FIG. 1B . The I/O controller may control one or more I/O devices such as a keyboard  126  and a pointing device  127 , e.g., a mouse or optical pen. Furthermore, an I/O device may also provide storage and/or an installation medium  116  for the computing device  100 . In still other embodiments, the computing device  100  may provide USB connections to receive portable USB storage devices such as the USB Flash Drive line of devices manufactured by Twintech Industry, Inc. of Los Alamitos, Calif. 
     Referring still to  FIG. 1B , the computing device  100  may support any suitable installation device  116 , such as a floppy disk drive for receiving floppy disks such as 3.5-inch, 5.25-inch disks or ZIP disks, a CD-ROM drive, a CD-R/RW drive, a DVD-ROM drive, tape drives of various formats, USB device, hard-drive or any other device suitable for installing software and programs. The computing device  100  may further comprise a storage device, such as one or more hard disk drives or redundant arrays of independent disks, for storing an operating system and other related software, and for storing application software programs such as any program related to the client agent  120 . Optionally, any of the installation devices  116  could also be used as the storage device. Additionally, the operating system and the software can be run from a bootable medium, for example, a bootable CD, such as KNOPPIX, a bootable CD for GNU/Linux that is available as a GNU/Linux distribution from knoppix.net. 
     Furthermore, the computing device  100  may include a network interface  118  to interface to the network  104  through a variety of connections including, but not limited to, standard telephone lines, LAN or WAN links (e.g., 802.11, T1, T3, 56 kb, X.25, SNA, DECNET), broadband connections (e.g., ISDN, Frame Relay, ATM, Gigabit Ethernet, Ethernet-over-SONET), wireless connections, or some combination of any or all of the above. Connections can be established using a variety of communication protocols (e.g., TCP/IP, IPX, SPX, NetBIOS, Ethernet, ARCNET, SONET, SDH, Fiber Distributed Data Interface (FDDI), RS232, IEEE 802.11, IEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, CDMA, GSM, WiMax and direct asynchronous connections). In one embodiment, the computing device  100  communicates with other computing devices  100 ′ via any type and/or form of gateway or tunneling protocol such as Secure Socket Layer (SSL) or Transport Layer Security (TLS). The network interface  118  may comprise a built-in network adapter, network interface card, PCMCIA network card, card bus network adapter, wireless network adapter, USB network adapter, modem or any other device suitable for interfacing the computing device  100  to any type of network capable of communication and performing the operations described herein. 
     In some embodiments, the computing device  100  may comprise or be connected to multiple display devices  124   a - 124   n , which each may be of the same or different type and/or form. As such, any of the I/O devices  130   a - 130   n  and/or the I/O controller  123  may comprise any type and/or form of suitable hardware, software, or combination of hardware and software to support, enable or provide for the connection and use of multiple display devices  124   a - 124   n  by the computing device  100 . For example, the computing device  100  may include any type and/or form of video adapter, video card, driver, and/or library to interface, communicate, connect or otherwise use the display devices  124   a - 124   n . In one embodiment, a video adapter may comprise multiple connectors to interface to multiple display devices  124   a - 124   n . In other embodiments, the computing device  100  may include multiple video adapters, with each video adapter connected to one or more of the display devices  124   a - 124   n . In some embodiments, any portion of the operating system of the computing device  100  may be configured for using multiple displays  124   a - 124   n . In other embodiments, one or more of the display devices  124   a - 124   n  may be provided by one or more other computing devices, such as computing devices  100   a  and  100   b  connected to the computing device  100 , for example, via a network. These embodiments may include any type of software designed and constructed to use another computer&#39;s display device as a second display device  124   a  for the computing device  100 . One ordinarily skilled in the art will recognize and appreciate the various ways and embodiments that a computing device  100  may be configured to have multiple display devices  124   a - 124   n.    
     In further embodiments, an I/O device  130  may be a bridge between the system bus  150  and an external communication bus, such as a USB bus, an Apple Desktop Bus, an RS-232 serial connection, a SCSI bus, a FireWire bus, a FireWire 800 bus, an Ethernet bus, an AppleTalk bus, a Gigabit Ethernet bus, an Asynchronous Transfer Mode bus, a HIPPI bus, a Super HIPPI bus, a SerialPlus bus, a SCI/LAMP bus, a FibreChannel bus, or a Serial Attached small computer system interface bus. 
     A computing device  100  of the sort depicted in  FIG. 1B  typically operates under the control of operating systems, which control scheduling of tasks and access to system resources. The computing device  100  can be running any operating system such as any of the versions of the MICROSOFT WINDOWS operating systems, the different releases of the Unix and Linux operating systems, any version of the MAC OS for Macintosh computers, any embedded operating system, any real-time operating system, any open source operating system, any proprietary operating system, any operating systems for mobile computing devices, or any other operating system capable of running on the computing device and performing the operations described herein. Typical operating systems include: WINDOWS 3.x, WINDOWS 95, WINDOWS 98, WINDOWS 2000, WINDOWS NT 3.51, WINDOWS NT 4.0, WINDOWS CE, WINDOWS XP, and WINDOWS VISTA, all of which are manufactured by Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash.; MAC OS, manufactured by Apple Inc., of Cupertino, Calif.; and OS/2, manufactured by International Business Machines of Armonk, N.Y. A server  106  and a client  102  may be heterogeneous, executing different operating systems. 
     The computing device  100  can be any workstation, desktop computer, laptop or notebook computer, server, portable computer, mobile telephone or other portable telecommunication device, media playing device, a gaming system, mobile computing device, or any other type and/or form of computing, telecommunications or media device that is capable of communication and that has sufficient processor power and memory capacity to perform the operations described herein. In some embodiments, the computing device  100  may have different processors, operating systems, and input devices consistent with the device. For example, in one of these embodiments, the computing device  100  is a TREO 180, 270, 600, 650, 680, 700p, 700w/wx, 750, 755p, 800w, Centro, or Pro smart phone manufactured by Palm, Inc; the TREO smart phone is operated under the control of the PalmOS operating system and includes a stylus input device as well as a five-way navigator device. 
     In other embodiments the computing device  100  is a mobile device, such as a JAVA-enabled cellular telephone or personal digital assistant (PDA), such as the i55sr, i58sr, i85s, i88s, i90c, i95cl, i335, i365, i570, I576, i580, i615, i760, i836, i850, i870, i880, i920, i930, ic502, ic602, ic902, i776 or the im1100, all of which are manufactured by Motorola Corp. of Schaumburg, Ill., the 6035 or the 7135, manufactured by Kyocera of Kyoto, Japan, or the i300 or i330, manufactured by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., of Seoul, Korea. In some embodiments, the computing device  100  is a mobile device manufactured by Nokia of Finland, or by Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB of Lund, Sweden. 
     In still other embodiments, the computing device  100  is a Blackberry portable or smart phone, such as the devices manufactured by Research In Motion Limited, including the Blackberry 7100 series, 8700 series, 7700 series, 7200 series, the Blackberry 7520, the Blackberry PEARL 8100, the 8700 series, the 8800 series, the Blackberry Storm, Blackberry Bold, Blackberry Curve 8900, and the Blackberry Pearl Flip. In yet other embodiments, the computing device  100  is a smart phone, Pocket PC, Pocket PC Phone, or other portable mobile device supporting Microsoft Windows Mobile Software. Moreover, the computing device  100  can be any workstation, desktop computer, laptop or notebook computer, server, portable computer, mobile telephone, any other computer, or other form of computing or telecommunications device that is capable of communication and that has sufficient processor power and memory capacity to perform the operations described herein. 
     In some embodiments, the computing device  100  is a digital audio player. In one of these embodiments, the computing device  100  is a digital audio player such as the Apple IPOD, IPOD Touch, IPOD NANO, and IPOD SHUFFLE lines of devices, manufactured by Apple Inc., of Cupertino, Calif. In another of these embodiments, the digital audio player may function as both a portable media player and as a mass storage device. In other embodiments, the computing device  100  is a digital audio player such as the DigitalAudioPlayer Select MP3 players, manufactured by Samsung Electronics America, of Ridgefield Park, N.J., or the Motorola m500 or m25 Digital Audio Players, manufactured by Motorola Inc. of Schaumburg, Ill. In still other embodiments, the computing device  100  is a portable media player, such as the Zen Vision W, the Zen Vision series, the Zen Portable Media Center devices, or the Digital MP3 line of MP3 players, manufactured by Creative Technologies Ltd. In yet other embodiments, the computing device  100  is a portable media player or digital audio player supporting file formats including, but not limited to, MP3, WAV, M4A/AAC, WMA Protected AAC, RIFF, Audible audiobook, Apple Lossless audio file formats and .mov, .m4v, and .mp4MPEG-4 (H.264/MPEG-4 AVC) video file formats. 
     In some embodiments, a display on a mobile computing device  100  includes a touch-screen. In one of these embodiments, a touch-screen sensor includes a touch-responsive surface that detects touch input from a user of the mobile computing device  100 . In another of these embodiments, the touch-screen sensor redirects an identification of a location of the touch input on the touch-responsive surface to an operating system executing on the mobile computing device  100 . In another of these embodiments, the operating system redirects the identification of the location of the touch input to a software application for processing. In still another of these embodiments, the software application correlates the location of the touch input with a displayed user interaction element and processes the interaction on behalf of the user. 
     In some embodiments, the computing device  100  comprises a combination of devices, such as a mobile phone combined with a digital audio player or portable media player. In one of these embodiments, the computing device  100  is a Motorola RAZR or Motorola ROKR line of combination digital audio players and mobile phones. In another of these embodiments, the computing device  100  is an iPhone smartphone, manufactured by Apple Inc., of Cupertino, Calif. 
     Referring now to  FIG. 2A , a block diagram depicts one embodiment of a system for providing anonymous and traceable access to assets. In one embodiment, to resolve problems that arise in sharing access to data for collaboration across organizations, while protecting individual contributors&#39; identities from inappropriate access, the methods and systems described herein provide functionality for data aliasing. 
     In some embodiments, a solution is provided to allow sharing of data, including linguistic assets such as translation memory and glossary data, across organizations or groups by implementing an aliasing system for data objects. In some embodiments, the data can be stored in data structures, such as nodes, tables, glossaries, databases or other type of storage. These data structures may be known as data objects, objects, language objects, linguistic objects, or similar terminology. In one embodiment, the organization or group that owns a data object can create one or more exports for an object and share a token (also known as a key) for an export with another organization (which may be referred to as a receiving organization). In another embodiment, a receiving organization adds a new link object referring to the exported object by inputting the token and adding a local name and other metadata. In still another embodiment, users at the receiving organization can interact with the linked object as if it were an object residing in the receiving tenant workspace. In yet another embodiment, the receiving organization may export the linked object to other users or organizations. 
     Referring still to  FIG. 2A , and in greater detail, the system includes a first server  106   a , a second server  106   b , a local client  102   a  and a remote client  102   b . In one embodiment, the access manager  250  executing on the first server  106   a  provides a user of the local client  102   a  with access to a first workspace  202 . In another embodiment, the access manager  250  executing on the first server  106   a  provides a user of the local client  102   a  with access to at least one object  204  stored within the first workspace  202 . In still another embodiment, a second access manager  250   b  executing on the second server  106   b  provides a user of the remote client  102   b  with access to a second workspace  206 . In still even another embodiment, the second access manager  250   b  executing on the second server  106   b  provides a user of the remote client  102   b  with access to a second workspace  206 , which contains an alias  208  for a first object  204   a ; the user of the remote client  102   b  may access the first object  204   a  stored by the first workspace  202  via the alias  208  that is generated by the alias manager  260 . 
     In some embodiments, the access manager  250  may comprise hardware, software, or any combination of hardware and software that creates, modifies or otherwise interact with the permission settings to a workspace executing on a client device. The access manager may also be called a permissions manager, access agent, permissions generator, or similar. The access manager  250  may comprise an application, program, script or other form of executable instructions. The access manager  250  may comprise any logic, function or operation to create, maintain, modify or process permissions to a client device  102 . In some embodiments, the access manager  250  may comprise policies that determine access to the workspace  202  or objects  204 . In some embodiments, the policy is modified by an administrator. In other embodiments, the policy may be modified by a current user. In other embodiments, the access manager may permit only a small number of administrators, pre-determined at manufacture or pre-determined upon loading of the system. 
     In some embodiments, the alias manager  260  may comprise hardware, software, or any combination of hardware and software that creates, modifies, stores, or otherwise processes aliases to an object  204  in a workspace  202 . The alias manager may also be called an alias engine, alias generator, object aliaser, or similar. The alias manager  260  may generate alias using random alpha-numeric symbols. In some embodiments, the alias may also comprise non-alpha numeric symbols. In other embodiments, the alias generated by the alias manager may be generated using an IP address as a seed. In other embodiments, the alias generated by the alias manager may comprise randomly generated sequences of number, letters, symbols or any combination thereof. The alias manager  260  may store the generated aliases in storage executing on the server on which the alias manager  260  resides. In other embodiments, the alias manager  260  may store the generated aliases and corresponding user identities in a table, database, or other data structure stored on the server  106 . In other embodiments, the alias manager  260  may store the generated aliases and corresponding user identities in a data structure as described herein on a separate server  106 . In still other embodiments, the alias manager  260  may store the generated aliases and corresponding user identities in a data structure that is stored in multiple locations. 
     In some embodiments, an alias  208  is a link to the first object  204   a  (for example, a hyperlink allowing access across a network  104  to data stored on the first server  106   a ). In other embodiments, the alias  208  is represented to a user of the second workspace  206  as a local copy of the object  204 , although the object  204  does not reside locally. In still other embodiments, an alias is a system-internal reference to the object in question, allowing users in one organization to access objects in a workspace owned by a different organization. In further embodiments, a subscriber will create an alias token (e.g., a system-generated number) and transmit (e.g., email) the alias token to a different subscriber (e.g., a subscriber outside the system managed by the subscriber&#39;s organization). In one of these embodiments, the client device  102  receiving the token will use the token to then generate an alias to the object in question, and be able to access the object across a network  104 . 
     In some embodiments, a user may generate multiple aliases  208  at once, selecting multiple assets and generating multiple tokens. In other embodiments, functionality is provided making it easy for users to send tokens to multiple recipients. In still other embodiments, a user interface is provided allowing users to generate and transmit tokens. In other embodiments, an issuer provides a user-friendly name for an alias. In some embodiments, the system generates a number identifying the alias. In further embodiments, both the issuer and receiver are provided with an identifier with which they may refer to aliased objects. 
     In some embodiments, a user may generate an alias token which can be sent to multiple people. The first user to use the token to log into a workspace and access the aliased object using the alias token maintains control over the aliased object. The other users who received the alias token will be denied access to the aliased object. 
     In some embodiments, a workspace providing access to data objects is assigned to an organization. In other embodiments, the workspace stores a copy of the object  204 . In further embodiments, an organization having access to a workspace is referred to as a “tenant” and may be described as having a “tenancy.” In some embodiments, multiple workspaces may exist on a single server. In other embodiments, workspaces may exist on multiple servers. In still other embodiments, workspaces may exist in a computing cloud, in which case the workspace may not exist or persist on a single workspace, but rather would be available via the computing cloud. 
     In one embodiment, an organization assigns access to the objects  204  to individuals within the organization; for example, an administrator may set an access control policy in the access manager  250  that allows a user to access an object  204  either through direct access to a first server  106   a  or from a local client  102   a  accessing the first server  106   a  across a network  104 . In another embodiment, however, to assign access to the objects  204  to individuals external to the organization, an administrator or other user of a first server  106   a  may generate an alias token to be used by a third party to access the linguistic asset through an alias  208 . The alias token is transmitted to a user and will be used by the second user to log into an available workspace  206  and access the aliased object using the alias token. In still another embodiment, an administrator or other user of a first server  106  may direct the creation of the alias  208  by the alias manager  260  within the second workspace  206 , which may, for example, be operated by or accessible to users of a second organization. 
     In some embodiments, the organization that is assigned to a particular workspace is considered to be an owner of the objects within the workspace and is authorized to grant access to the objects directly or via aliases. In one of these embodiments, an organization that has control over which objects  204  are accessed directly or via alias by users internal or external to the organization is able to provide controlled access to data objects across organizations through the access manager  250  and the alias manager  260 . In another of these embodiments, organizations may provide object aliases  208  for a plurality of organizations. In still another of these embodiments, the organization defines a type of permission for the usage of the data accessed via a particular alias  208 ; for example, users of one a second workspace  206  may be granted a type of permission that allows them to access and modify the object  204  while users of a third workspace may be granted a type of permission that allows them to access but not to modify the object  204 . In this embodiment, permissions may include, without limitation, the ability to read an object, the ability to write to or modify an object, list access, and delete access. In yet another of these embodiments, the members of the organization that owns the data in the first workspace  204  (for example, a user of the local client  102   a  with appropriate authorization) may modify a type of access granted by a particular alias  208 . 
     Referring now to  FIG. 2B , a block diagram depicts another embodiment of a system for providing anonymous and traceable access to objects. In one embodiment, a second workspace  206  stores an alias  208  for a first object  204   a —which is owned by an organization that stores the first object  204   a  in a first workspace  204 . Organizations may create chains of aliases linked to the first object  204   a  via the alias  208  generated by the alias manager  260   a . For example, a user of the second workspace  206  may create a second alias (an alias  212 ) and export the alias to a third workspace  210  on a third server  106   a , where it is received by the access manager  250   c  and processed by the second alias manager  260   b . The alias  212  provides a user of a remote client  102   b  with access to the alias  208 , which may be used to access the first object  204   a . The alias  212  may be provided to users within the receiving organization or to users within a third organization, external to both the organization that owns the first object  204   a  and the organization that owns the alias  208 . In some embodiments, a creator of an alias  212  may provide users of the alias  212  with more limited access rights than those granted by the creator of an alias  208 ; for example, an owner of an object  204  may authorize users of the alias  208  to access and modify the object  204  while the creator of an alias  212  may only allow users of the alias  212  to access the object  204  without making modifications. In other embodiments, the creator of the alias  212  provides users of the alias  212  with the same set of rights granted by the creator of the alias  208 . 
     Now referring to  FIG. 2C , a block diagram depicts another embodiment of a system for providing anonymous and traceable access to objects. In some embodiments, multiple workspaces reside on the same server, as depicted in  FIG. 2C . Several clients may access the different workspaces on the server  106   a . Each workspace is isolated from each other and no data regarding usage or any other type of data is permitted to pass between the workspaces unless an explicit connection has been made. In some embodiments, workspaces may reside on different servers, as depicted in  FIGS. 2A-2B . In some embodiments, the workspaces are identified by the server on which they reside. In some embodiments, such associations between the servers and workspaces do not exist, especially if the workspaces reside in a computing cloud and may be frequently relocated among servers. When workspaces reside in a computing cloud, then they may not be associated with a specific server. 
     In one embodiment, a modification to an object  204  is logged by the alias manager  260 . In another embodiment, an identity of a user modifying an object  204  is stored with the object  204  by the alias manager  260 . In still another embodiment, however, access to a stored identify of a user modifying an object  204  is restricted. In some embodiments, access to the identity of a user modifying an object  204  is restricted to an organization to which the user belongs. By way of example, and without limitation, a first user of the second workspace  206  shown in  FIG. 2B  may access the identity of a second user accessing, via an alias  208 , an object  204  and modifying the object because both users are users of the same workspace, while a user of the first workspace  204  may not access the identity of the second user but may access the name of the organization allowed to access the second workspace  208 . Similarly, and as another example, a user of the second workspace may access the identity of an organization accessing the alias  212  but may not access the identity of an organization or user that accessed the object  204  via an alias to the alias  212  (e.g., a subcontractor of the organization). In one of these embodiments, because aliases can be issued for aliases, the identity of the final organization that accessed the original data may be masked from the owner of the data. In another of these embodiments, this functionality allows each an organization in a chain of organizations accessing an object  204  to identify organizations to which it provided an alias but may not be allowed to identify organizations that were granted further aliases, which provides anonymity for those entities. In an embodiment in which two organizations wish to collaborate on the creation, modification, or management of data but a first organization wishes to protect the identity of its users from a second (such as, for example, valued sub-contractors whom the first organization does not want the second organization accessing directly or employees whose personal data, including identity, the first organization may want, or be required, to protect). In one of these embodiments, the second organization has the option of working with the first organization to trace the identity of a user that has modified an object  204 , but does not have the ability to access the user identity without cooperation from the first organization. This is an example of an embodiment in which the methods and systems described herein provide access to objects that is both anonymous and traceable. 
     In one embodiment, an organization that gives more than one alias on the same data to other organizations may allow those other organizations to see the origin of manipulated data being those respective organizations, or not. In the later case, the own organizational name will be displayed as origin organization. This can be decided a) as a general rule for all aliases generated for the data b) on an alias-by-alias base for each receiving alias c) on an alias-by-alias base for each contributing alias. 
     In some embodiments, in order to hide data and metadata across organizations and to provide flexible security for the system a number of rules should be configurable on the publisher side of the link. In one of these embodiments, the restrictions are all on the organization level and not on a per user level. In another of these embodiments, by of example, access restrictions may include, without limitation, the following: 
     1. What can be exported (e.g., All, Subscriber added) 
     2. What operations are allowed for the subscriber. 
     3. Hide information on origin of data from other subscribers. This may include optionally allow faking the origin of a translation as coming from the publisher of the link instead of from the actual subscriber that added the data if the adding subscriber is different from the requesting subscriber. 
     In some embodiments, when a link is established, the two involved organization agree on a mutual shared secret different from the initial token to use during normal operations. In one of these embodiments, the organizations also exchange the necessary data to display each other&#39;s names, and display the rights on the object. In another of these embodiments, the cross-organization operations will be done through messages, which hide the details of where the other organization is located (same/different server) for both initiator and target. In still another of these embodiments, this may initially be the userid of the user and each time it traverse a alias link it may be pre-pended with the organization id of the subscribing organization. In yet another embodiment, the system may not display the full path to a segment, only a local path will be decoded. The following is an example of one embodiment of this naming convention: User 1 (id=1234) in Tenant 1 (id=23) adds a segment to object  204   a  owned by Tenant3 and provided through 2 levels of links Tenant 2 (id=47) and Tenant 3 (id=96); Tenant3(Data Object  204  Owner)-alias-&gt;Tenant 2 -alias-&gt;Tenant 1 -User 1  adds segment; the patch would end up named as T47:T23:U1234; however, the Owner (tenant 3 ) will only see Tenant 2  as the adding user. Tenant 2  will only see Tenant 1  as the adding user and Tenant 1  and User 1  will see User 1  as the adding user. In some embodiments, this can be accomplished by each level removing itself from the head of the list when passing it on; if the receiver is not next in the list, the entire path may be replaced according to the link configuration. 
     In some embodiments, functionality is provided allowing privileged users of a workspace  204  to view a list of aliases, tokens that haven&#39;t yet been used to generate aliases, and the assets that the tokens/aliases correspond to. In one of these embodiments, before generation of an alias  208 , a privileged user may view an identification of a user creating a token, an alias token, and a date issued. In another of these embodiments, after generation of an alias  208 , a privileged user may view an identification of a user creating a token, an organization to which the token has been provided and a date issued. In other embodiments, functionality is provided allowing privileged users of a workspace  204  to remove, cancel, or revoke an issued alias. 
     The methods and systems described herein may be implemented to allow cross-organizational collaboration on objects storing any type of data. Although the following examples describe the use of these methods and systems in connection with a system for translation of data from a source language to a target language, it should be understood that these methods and systems are not limited to language translation environments. 
     The following illustrative examples, discussed in conjunction with  FIG. 3 , show how the methods and apparatus discussed above can be used to provide anonymous and traceable external access to internal linguistic assets. 
     An Enterprise Subscriber Aliases a Translation Memory and Glossary for Use on an Outsourced Project 
     In one embodiment, an enterprise subscriber has a project for outsourcing to an LSP provider subscriber. In another embodiment, a privileged user in the enterprise tenancy modifies the translation memory (TM) and glossary properties for the TM and glossary assets to be used on the project, creating aliases that link TM 1 , TM 2 , Gloss 1 , Gloss 2 , etc. In still another embodiment, the enterprise user generates an access token for downstream providers who should have access to the aliased assets. In yet another embodiment, the enterprise subscriber provides the token to the LSP subscriber. 
     In one embodiment, the LSP provider subscriber in turn generates access token for freelance provider subscribers who need to use the aliased TM, and sends that access information to the freelance subscribers outside the system. In another embodiment, the enterprise subscriber cannot see the users that the LSP assigns to the aliased assets, nor can he see that the LSP created additional aliases on the aliased assets. In still another embodiment, when the enterprise subscriber views segments in the TM that were added by freelance subscribers working for the LSP, the creation user name is the LSP tenancy name—not the individual freelance subscribers. 
     An LSP User Saves Segments to an Aliased TM and Performs a TM Export 
     In one embodiment, a staff linguist working for an LSP user with access to an aliased TM saves a translation. In another embodiment, all other users with access to the aliased TM can see the new segment. In still another embodiment, the creation user is listed as the tenant who generated the access token. In another embodiment, the LSP staff linguist user performs a TM export. In still another embodiment, only the segments contributed by users in his tenancy or by users in tenancies, which received aliases by his tenancy are exported. In still even another embodiment, users in the enterprise subscriber tenancy with export access to the aliased TM can export all segments from the aliased TM. In yet another embodiment, behavior is identical for both new and updated segments saved to the TM. 
     An Enterprise Subscriber User Saves a Segment to a TM 
     In one embodiment, an LSP subscriber user with access to an aliased TM saves a segment. In another embodiment, other users in tenancies with access to the asset can see/use the new segment but can&#39;t export it. In still another embodiment, users in the enterprise tenancy with export access to the aliased TM can see/use and export this and all segments in the original TM. In yet another embodiment, behavior is identical for both new and updated segments 
     An LSP Subscriber Aliases an Enterprise Subscriber&#39;s TM for Use by a Freelance Subscriber 
     In one embodiment, an LSP subscriber creates an alias for an already-aliased enterprise subscriber TM, and gives access to a freelance subscriber. In another embodiment, the freelance subscriber saves a new segment to the TM. In still another embodiment, when the freelance subscriber retrieves this segment, he can see that he is the creation user. In still even another embodiment, the freelance subscriber exports the TM. In yet another embodiment, the export file contains only the segments that were saved from users in his tenancy. 
     In one embodiment, the LSP subscriber does an export of the TM. In another embodiment, the export file contains segments from all freelancers that the LSP has granted access to, and from, all users in his own tenancy. In still another embodiment, when the enterprise subscriber sees the segments saved to TM by the freelance subscriber users, only the name of the LSP tenant is displayed as the value for creation/update users. In still even another embodiment, the enterprise subscriber does an export of the TM and all segments are exported. In yet another embodiment, behavior is identical for both new and updated segments. 
     Publishing an Alias 
     Referring now to  FIG. 4A , a screen shot depicts one embodiment of a user interface allowing a user to create and share an alias  208 . In one embodiment, a user of a first organization interacts with the interface  402  to make an object  204 —such as a translation memory, a glossary, a review package, or other data object—available to a user in a second organization. 
     Referring now to  FIG. 4B , a screen shot depicts one embodiment of a user interface allowing a user to publish a new alias  208  for a translation memory object  204 . In one embodiment, a user of a first organization interacts with the interface  404  to specify the details of a new alias  208  and to share the alias  208  with a user in a second organization. In other embodiments (not shown), the user interface  404  is modified to identify a type of data object  204  for which an alias  208  is being generated; for example, the user interface  404  may display different user interface elements allowing users to specify the details of a new alias for a translation memory object than the user interface might display for specifying the details of a new alias for a glossary object, or for another type of data object. 
     In further embodiments, the user interface allows a user or administrator to specify the level of write access for the alias. In some embodiments, the user interface permits a user to add or specify a language or multiple languages of the linguistic asset. In some embodiments, the user interface has an option to re-publish an existing alias. In other embodiments, the user interface has an option to display the name of background links. 
     Referring now to  FIG. 4C , a screen shot depicts one embodiment of a user interface confirming generation of a new token. As depicted in  FIG. 4C , a user interface  406  displays information confirming that a number of tokens was generated as requested by the user. 
     Referring now to  FIG. 4D , a screen shot depicts one embodiment of a user interface confirming completion of a publication of an alias. As depicted in  FIG. 4D , a user interface  408  displays data confirming that an alias  208  was transmitted via email to a user of a particular organization. 
     Referring now to  FIG. 4E , a screen shot depicts one embodiment of a user interface allowing a user to modify the access rights of a recipient of an alias for a translation memory object. As depicted in  FIG. 4E , a user interface  410  displays data identifying types of actions that a recipient of an alias  208  is permitted to take. In one embodiment, in which the alias  208  is an alias for a translation memory object, the permissions that a user can control are the right to import data into the object, the right to export all segments of the object, the right to export the recipient&#39;s own segments of the object, the right to connect background links to the object, and the right to the object in a background link. 
     Referring now to  FIG. 4F , a screen shot depicts one embodiment of a user interface allowing a user to modify the access rights of a recipient of an alias for a glossary object. As depicted in  FIG. 4F , a user interface  412  displays data identifying types of actions that a recipient of an alias  208  is permitted to take. In one embodiment, in which the alias  208  is an alias for a glossary object, the permissions that a user can control are the right to import data into the object, the right to export data from the object, and the right to use the object as a link to terminology. 
     Referring now to  FIG. 4G , a screen shot depicts one embodiment of a user interface allowing a user to modify the access rights of a recipient of an alias for a review object. As depicted in  FIG. 4G , a user interface  414  displays data identifying types of actions that a recipient of an alias  208  is permitted to take. In one embodiment, in which the alias  208  is an alias for a review object, the permissions that a user can control are the right to connect to glossaries. 
     Referring now to  FIG. 5A , a screen shot depicts one embodiment of a graphical representation of an object for which a user has created an alias. As shown in  FIG. 5A , an icon  502  may be selected to represent the object  204   a  for which an alias  208  was created that is substantially different from an icon  504  selected to represent an object  204   b  for which an alias  208  has not yet been created. Referring now to  FIG. 5B , a screen shot depicts one embodiment of a user interface  506  identifying a token for which an alias  208  has been generated and published. Referring now to  FIG. 5C , a screen shot depicts one embodiment of a user interface  508  displaying an identification of an organization receiving access to a published alias  208 . 
     Subscribing to an Alias 
     Referring now to  FIG. 6A , a screen shot depicts one embodiment of a user interface for making a received alias available for a user of a receiving organization. As shown in  FIG. 6A , a user interface  602  allows a user to request a subscription to an alias  208 . In some embodiments, a user of a first organization that owns an object  204  creates a token allowing a user of a second organization to access the object  204  by creating a new alias  208  for the object  204 . In one of these embodiments, a user of an organization receiving a token for an object  204  makes the object available by subscribing to it via the user interface  602 . Referring now to  FIG. 6B , a screen shot depicts one embodiment of a user interface allowing a user of a receiving organization to generate a new alias. In one embodiment, a user interface  604  allows a user of a receiving organization to create an alias  208  for a received token. In other embodiments, the user of the first organization creates the new alias  208  using an interface substantially similar to the user interface  604  and transmits the new alias  208  to the user of the second organization. 
     Referring now to  FIG. 6C , a screen shot depicts one embodiment of a graphical representation of an alias  208 . As shown in  FIG. 6C , an icon  606  may be selected to represent the alias  208  for the object  204   a . In one embodiment, the icon  606  is substantially different from an icon  608  selected to represent an object  204   c  residing within a workspace  206  for which an alias  212  has not yet been created. 
     Referring now to  FIG. 7 , a flow diagram depicting a method  700  for providing anonymous and traceable access to linguistic assets is depicted. In brief overview, at step  710  a first workspace  202  grants to a client  102   a  access to a linguistic asset  204   a  in the first workspace. At step  715 , the first workspace  202  generates an alias token and transmits the alias token to a second client  102   b . At step  720 , the second workspace  206  grants to a second client  102   b  access to the second workspace  206 . At step  725 , the first workspace  202  grants to the second workspace  206  access to the first workspace  202 . At step  730 , the second workspace  206  generates an aliased object  208  for the linguistic asset  204   a  using the received alias token and stores the aliased object  208  in the second workspace  206 . At step  735 , the second client  102   b  accesses the linguistic asset  204   a  residing in the first workspace  202  via the aliased object  208  in the second workspace  206 . 
     Further referring to  FIG. 7 , and in more detail, in one embodiment, a first workspace  202  grants to a client device  102   a  access to a linguistic asset  204   a  in the workspace  202 . The client device  102   a  sends a request to the server  106   a , requesting access to linguistic assets  204  residing in the workspace  202 . A client request can be a request to access an application, service, or process executing or executed by the server  106 . The access manager  250   a  determines if the client  102   a  has permissions to access the linguistic asset  204 . The client  102  and server  106  can communicate over an established connection, such as by TCP/IP. 
     At step  715 , the first workspace generates an alias token and transmits the alias token to a second client. In some embodiments, the alias token is created using a random number generator. In other embodiments, the alias token is created using random number, letters, symbols or any combination thereof. In other embodiments, the alias token is created using some identifying information about the client, the linguistic asset, or the first workspace and applies an algorithm to generate a token that may be comprised of numbers, letters or symbols. In some embodiments, the alias token may be a combination of words and dates associated with the asset. In some embodiments, the alias token may be generated using any of the methods described herein. In some embodiments, an alias manager  260   a  may generate the alias token. In some embodiments, the alias manager  260   a  may use a random number generator to create a token. In some embodiments, the alias manager  260   a  may access a pre-existing or pre-created token and associate the token with the identified linguistic asset  204   a . In some embodiments, the alias manager  260  communicates with a random number generator and uses the number as a seed to generate an alias token to mask the identity of the user. In other embodiments, the alias manager  260  uses some identifying information of the user, such as an IP address or user account name and incorporates the data to generate an alias that appears to be random. In other embodiments, the alias manager  260  creates an alias token using an algorithm loaded into the system. 
     Once the alias token has been generated, the first workspace transmits the alias token to a second client. In some embodiments, the token may be transmitted through an email, text, or other type of correspondence. In other embodiments, the token may be transmitted through a secured connection, once the second client  102   b  logs into a webpage. In some embodiments, the token may be transferred to users through any means by which data can be transferred among users. In some embodiments, the token may be transmitted to several users. If the users belong to the same organization or group, then the tokens may be used by all the members of the group or organization. In some embodiments, only one user from a group or organization may use the token at a time. In other embodiments, all users may simultaneously use or use concurrently the token. If the users do not belong to the same organization or group, then the first organization or group that uses the token can establish control and users belonging to a different group may no longer use the given token. In such cases, members of the same organization can use the token, whereas if the user does not belong to the organization or group, then the token would no longer function properly and could not be used to generate an aliased object. 
     At step  720 , the second workspace  206 , grants to a second client  102   b  access to the second workspace  206 . The access manager  250   b  receives a request from the remote client device  102   b , requesting access to linguistic assets  204  residing in the first workspace  202 . The access manager  250   b  may determine whether the client has permissions to access the linguistic asset  204 . The remote client  102   b  and second server  106   b  can communicate over an established connection, such as by TCP/IP. In some embodiments, the second client  102   b  may be a user of an existing workspace  206 . In some embodiments, the user may not be associated with any workspace. If the user is not associated with any workspace, in some embodiments the second client  102   b  may access a workspace for new users. In some embodiments, the workspace for new users may be a workspace with limited capabilities. In other embodiments, the workspace may be available to the client  102   b  for a limited amount of time. In some embodiments, the workspace may require the client  102   b  to sign up for a subscription to the workspace. In other embodiments, the workspace may invite the user of the client device  102   b  to join an existing workspace. 
     At step  725 , the first workspace  202  grants to the second workspace  206  access to the first workspace  202 . In some embodiments, the access manager  250   a  controls access to the workspace. The access manager executing in the first workspace  202  may communicate with the access manager in the second workspace  206 . In some embodiments, the access manager in the first workspace may permit access by the second workspace  206  responsive to an existing policy. In other embodiments, the first access manager  250   a  may create a new policy to enable the second workspace  206  to access the first workspace  202 . In some embodiments, the first access manager  250   a  may require authentication from the second workspace  206  each time the second workspace  206  wishes to connect. In some embodiments, the workspaces may be connected over TCP/IP. In other embodiments, the workspaces may be connected through a secure network connection. In some embodiments, the first workspace  202  and the second workspace  206  may reside on the same computing device. In other embodiments, the first workspace  202  and the second workspace may reside on different computing devices. 
     In some embodiments, the first workspace does not grant permission to the second permission to access the first workspace. Rather, all the workspaces of the system reside in a computing layer. Once an alias token is generated and transmitted to a second user, the second user can then use the alias token to establish a connection between existing workspaces. A connection manager residing in the computing layer receives a request from a workspace. The request may include the alias token which contains information embedded in the token that identifies the originating workspace that generated the alias token. In other embodiments, the connections manager receives an alias token and looks up the workspace that generated the alias token to identify the correct the workspace. The connection manager uses the alias token to identify the specific object or linguistic asset and the aliased object and establishes a connection between the two objects. The connection manager ensures that the workspaces in which the linguistic asset or the aliased object reside do not have access to the other workspace. Thus, a specific connection is established to link the aliased object and the linguistic asset identified by the alias token without permitting general access by the workspaces to each other. 
     At step  730 , the second workspace generates an aliased object  208  for the linguistic asset  204   a  using the received alias token and stores the aliased object  208  in the second workspace  206 . Once the client  102   b  logs into a workspace, the client device transmits the alias token received from the first workspace  202  to the second workspace. Using the received token alias, the second workspace communicates with the first workspace  202  over the established connection and generates an aliased object  208 . The aliased object acts as a proxy object, in which the user of the second client device  102   b  may interact with the linguistic asset in the first workspace  202  without directly interacting with the asset  204   a . This mechanism provides several useful features. For example, by using the aliased object  208 , a user may access and use the asset  204   a  while shielding their individual identity to the first workspace  202 . The first workspace will only be able to see the group or organization name associated with the workspace from which the user accesses the asset  204   a  through the aliased object  208 . The mechanism also provides a means for allowing multiple users from different workspaces to access an asset  204   a  while shielding their identities from each other. The only identifying information regarding access of any asset is through the aliased object  208  in a workspace and the information is only visible to the workspace that generated the alias token which was used to generate the aliased object  208 . Thus, identifying information is very limited and only accessible by the workspace that provided the token to enable the access through an aliased object  208 . 
     In some embodiments, the receiver of an alias token may re-publish or re-transmit the token to a third party. In some embodiments, the alias manager  260  executing in the user&#39;s current workspace may generate a new alias token that relates to the original alias token. The alias manager  260  may set or determine the type of access available to a user. For example, the alias manager  260  may incorporate in the alias token that the user may only have READ access to a linguistic asset  204   a . In some embodiments, the alias manager  260  may set the permissions so that the receiving user has both READ and WRITE access to the linguistic asset  204   a  through the aliased object  208  generates using the received token. In some embodiments, if a user re-transmits or re-publishes an alias token and transmits the token to a third party, the original party (i.e. the first workspace  202  where the linguistic asset resides) will not be able to access or see any identifying information about the third party nor will it know when the third party accesses the asset  204   a . In some embodiments, this information may be stored at a system level, keeping track of all accesses by all aliased objects, but no workspace will have permissions to see or access such data. This data would only be available to the administrator of the system and not to any of the individual workspaces. 
     In some embodiments, each time a token is created or transmitted to another party, the issuing workspace will be able to see all of the identities of organization or groups that access the asset  204   a . Within an organization or group, the workspace may track all users that access an aliased object  208 . However, the information regarding individual users may not be published or known outside of the workspace. Whenever a user accesses the linguistic asset, either through an aliased object or through a chain of aliased objects, the only information visible to another workspace is the identity of the group or organization utilizing the workspace. User-level information is not available to neighboring or other workspaces. Additionally, group or organization identities may only be available to limited workspaces, such as workspaces that are deemed neighbors (on the same computing device or sharing the same resources) that may influence availability of resources to a workspace or to workspaces that provided an alias token. 
     At step  735 , the second client  102   b  access the linguistic asset  204   a  residing in the first workspace  202  via the aliased object in the second workspace. In some embodiments, a client  102   n  may access the linguistic asset  204   a  through a series of aliased objects  208 . In some embodiments, the system may limit the number of chains or aliased objects  208  of aliased objects  208 . Some limitations may be enforced through pre-existing policies. In some embodiments, the system may not provide any limitations to the number or “depth” of aliased objects (aliased object of an aliased object of an aliased object). 
     It should be understood that the systems described above may provide multiple ones of any or each of those components and these components may be provided on either a standalone machine or, in some embodiments, on multiple machines in a distributed system. The systems and methods described above may be implemented as a method, apparatus or article of manufacture using programming and/or engineering techniques to produce software, firmware, hardware, or any combination thereof. In addition, the systems and methods described above may be provided as one or more computer-readable programs embodied on or in one or more articles of manufacture. The term “article of manufacture” as used herein is intended to encompass code or logic accessible from and embedded in one or more computer-readable devices, firmware, programmable logic, memory devices (e.g., EEPROMs, ROMs, PROMs, RAMs, SRAMs, etc.), hardware (e.g., integrated circuit chip, Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), etc.), electronic devices, a computer readable non-volatile storage unit (e.g., CD-ROM, floppy disk, hard disk drive, etc.). The article of manufacture may be accessible from a file server providing access to the computer-readable programs via a network transmission line, wireless transmission media, signals propagating through space, radio waves, infrared signals, etc. The article of manufacture may be a flash memory card or a magnetic tape. The article of manufacture includes hardware logic as well as software or programmable code embedded in a computer readable medium that is executed by a processor. In general, the computer-readable programs may be implemented in any programming language, such as LISP, PERL, C, C++, C#, PROLOG, or in any byte code language such as JAVA. The software programs may be stored on or in one or more articles of manufacture as object code. 
     Having described certain embodiments of methods and systems for providing anonymous and traceable access to assets, it will now become apparent to one of skill in the art that other embodiments incorporating the concepts of the disclosure may be used.

Technology Classification (CPC): 6