Patent Abstract:
A computer system and program product for managing events. Program instructions, respond to notification of an event, by determining if a problem ticket can be automatically generated for the event. If so, the program instructions make a request to generate the problem ticket. The program instructions determine if the problem ticket can be automatically generated based in whole or in part on (a) a type of the event and a customer who owns or uses a computer system in which the event occurred, (b) a type of the event, a customer who owns or uses a computer system in which the event occurred, and a severity of the event, (c) a type of the event, a customer who owns or uses a computer system in which the event occurred, and a magnitude of the event, or (d) a type of the event and whether other events of a same type occur at approximately a same time. If a determination is made that a problem ticket cannot be automatically generated, other program instructions notify or initiate notification of an operator and supply event information for the operator so that the operator can determine whether to generate a problem ticket.

Full Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
       [0001]     The invention relates generally to computer systems, and deals more particularly with generation of problem tickets for a computer system.  
         [0002]     Computer systems often experience problems such as overflow of buffers, exhaustion of storage allocated to an application, hard drive failures, power outages, software errors and resource constraints. When such a problem occurs or when a system condition exceeds a threshold suggesting an impending problem, a known hardware or software monitor within the computer system detects the “event”, and sends an alert to a system console or a remote system. In either case, an operator or administrator will notice the event, and may take some corrective action. It was also known for the operator or administrator to create a “problem ticket” if warranted. To determine whether a problem ticket was warranted, the operator or administrator considered the type of problem and in some cases, the contractual obligations to the customer. When the problem ticket is warranted, the operator or administrator creates the problem ticket by obtaining an electronic form through a workstation, and entering the following information: customer name, problem type, severity level, source of problem (i.e. identity of hardware or software component) within the customer&#39;s computer system, operating system, network, and application. The operator or administrator then sends the problem ticket by e-mail to a suitable technical support person or support center for handling, i.e. correcting the problem. While the foregoing technique for determining whether to generate a problem ticket, generating the problem ticket and sending the problem ticket to the support person was effective, it required significant effort by an operator or administrator.  
         [0003]     Therefore, an object of the present invention is to automate the process of determining whether to generate a problem ticket and if warranted, automate the process of generating the problem ticket and sending it to a suitable support person.  
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
       [0004]     The invention resides in a computer system and program product for managing events. Program instructions, respond to notification of an event, by determining if a problem ticket can be automatically generated for the event. If so, the program instructions make a request to generate the problem ticket. The program instructions determine if the problem ticket can be automatically generated based in whole or in part on (a) a type of the event and a customer who owns or uses a computer system in which the event occurred, (b) a type of the event, a customer who owns or uses a computer system in which the event occurred, and a severity of the event, (c) a type of the event, a customer who owns or uses a computer system in which the event occurred, and a magnitude of the event, or (d) a type of the event and whether other events of a same type occur at approximately a same time.  
         [0005]     According to one feature of the present invention, if a determination is made that a problem ticket cannot be automatically generated, other program instructions notify or initiate notification of an operator and supply event information for the operator so that the operator can determine whether to generate a problem ticket. 
     
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES  
       [0006]      FIG. 1  is a block diagram illustrating a computer system which includes the present invention.  
         [0007]      FIG. 2  is a flow chart illustrating processing according to the present invention.  
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS  
       [0008]     Referring now to the drawings in detail wherein like reference numbers indicate like elements throughout,  FIG. 1  illustrates a computer system generally designated  10  which includes the present invention. System  10  comprises an event management server  11  which includes an event receiver program  12 . Program  12  receives notification of events from other, customer computer systems  15  and  17  via various event management protocols. System  10  also includes an automatic problem-ticket function  14  which receives notification of problems/events from the event receiver program  12 , and determines whether a problem ticket should be generated automatically. If so, program  14  generates a problem ticket creation message (containing problem ticket information). If program  14  determines that a problem ticket cannot be generated automatically, program  14  notifies a semiautomatic problem ticket program  18  within server  11  console or workstation  20 . In response, program  18  directs display at console or workstation  20 , information about the problem and requests that a workstation operator finish additional information for a problem ticket creation message. Program  18  also requests that the operator decide whether a problem ticket should be generated. If so, program  18  will generate the problem ticket creation message. The problem ticket creation message, whether sent by function  14  or  18 , is sent to a shared server gateway/bridge  30 . Gateway/bridge  30  then forwards the problem ticket creation message to one of a plurality of problem management systems  34 ,  35  or  36 , or  37 ,  38  or  39  or  40 , that supports the customer system where the problem originated. In the illustrated example, problem management systems  34 - 36  are all the same type, for example, IBM eESM system. Also, in the illustrated example, problem management systems  37 - 39  are all the same type, for example, Mcafee Help Desk (“MHD”) system. Both of these types of problem management systems can create problem tickets based on a problem ticket creation message. However, problem management system  40  (for example, Remedy or Peregrine problem management systems) cannot automatically create a problem ticket based on a problem ticket creation message. Therefore, gateway/bridge  10  also includes a problem ticket creation program  41  which can automatically create a problem ticket for problem management system  40  based on a problem ticket creation message. All of the problem management systems  34 ,  35  or  36 , or  37 ,  38  or  39  or  40  also track the handing of the problems. There are other commercially available problem management systems available today, which can be used with the present invention. Some of these other problem management systems are able to automatically generate a problem ticket based on a problem ticket creation message; others cannot.  
         [0009]     The following is a more detailed description of processing of an event notification within system  10 , according to the present invention. As illustrated in  FIG. 2 , event receiver program  12  within server  11  receives event notifications either from the customer systems  15  and  17  where the problems arise or from intermediate management consoles (not shown) (step  100 ). The event notification include specification of event/problem type, account name, source of the event and event severity. In response, the event receiver program  12  formats the event notification to a generic form supported by program  14  and places the formatted event notification on an inbound work queue  101  for automatic ticket program  14  (step  102 ). Automatic problem ticket program  14  periodically monitors inbound work queue  101  and detects the event notification from program  12 . Program  14  then determines if a problem ticket can be automatically generated for this event (decision  110 ). This determination is based on a rules base  111  maintained by program  14 . For example, there can be a predetermined list  112  of combinations of event types and account names which are considered candidates for automatic problem ticket generation. If the combination of event type and account name in the event notification matches one of the predetermined combinations in list  112 , the automatic problem ticket program  14  puts the event notification (in the form of a data object) on an outbound work queue  113 . Another rule in rule base  111  could cause automatic problem ticketing based on the combination of event type, account name and event severity, so that only severe events of a certain type for a certain customer are automatically ticketed. Another rule in rule base  111  could cause automatic problem ticketing based on the combination of event type, account name and magnitude of event. For example, if there is ninety five percent disk capacity utilization for a certain customer, this event is automatically ticketed. (However, if there is ninety percent disk capacity utilization, this does not result in automatic problem ticket generation, even though this event is monitored and reported to server  11 ). Another possible rule in the rules base  11  applies when there are a multitude of similar events from the same customer site. For example, if there is a power outage at a customer site, all the servers at the site may send the same event notification, i.e. “node down”. In such a case, a rule may indicate that program  14  should not automatically initiate creation of problem ticket(s), but instead, forward the event notification information to the operator at console or workstation  20  as described below. (In such a case, the operator will likely create just one problem ticket creation message.) Another possible rule in the rules base  11  applies when there are core events and other, related secondary events. For example, a hard drive failure may be considered a core event and there may be a rule allowing this event type/account to result in automatic problem ticketing. However, the hard drive failure may cause “secondary” application errors, hard drive warnings, and node down events, and there may be no rules for these secondary events. So, these secondary events would be passed to the operator at console or workstation  20  to determine whether to create a problem ticket creation message. Many other rules can be created and used by program  14 , depending on the environment. If program  14  determines to automatically ticket the event notification, program  14  converts the notification data into a “data object” which it places on work queue  113  (step  116 ). This object comprises account name, event type, severity, host name, IP address and queue routing information.  
         [0010]     Program  14  maintains a URL table  115  which lists the URL for each account/customer. All of the URLs are hosted by gateway/bridge  30 . For each data object on the work queue  113 , program  14  creates a problem ticket creation message in XML format, and sends it, using HTTPS protocol, to the URL for the account specified in the data object (which was obtained from the original event notification) (step  118 ). There can be multiple support people and/or support groups at each problem management system for the same account/customer, and the different support people and groups can have specialized expertise for respective types of events. The shared gateway server/bridge  30  maintains a support table  119  that lists for each event type, the support person or support group that has the requisite experience to handle the event, and therefore should get the problem ticket. So, in response to the XML message from program  14 , a gateway/bridge program  31  (within shared server gateway/bridge  30 ) determines from the table  119  what support person or support group should get the ticket (step  124 ). For example, if the event type indicates a problem with disk capacity and that the operating system (where the problem occurred) is Windows NT, then a Windows NT support person or support team should get the problem ticket. As another example, the network domain name of a resource may be used to route the problem ticket to a support group organized by physical location or site. Gateway/bridge  30  also includes an account table  125  which lists which problem management systems/accounts can automatically create a problem ticket based on a problem ticket creation. Next, gateway/bridge program  31  determines if the account listed in the problem ticket creation message received from program  14  can automatically create a problem ticket (decision  126 ). Gateway/bridge program  31  maintains a table  121  which lists for each account the form of the problem ticket creation message that it should receive. This is based on the type of problem management system used by the account/customer. If the account&#39;s problem management system can automatically create a problem ticket based on the problem ticket creation message (decision  126 , yes branch), gateway/bridge program  31  transforms the problem ticket creation message received from program  14  into the message form of the target problem management station used for the account specified in the XML message received from program  14  (step  128 ). Typically, the problem management systems define their own unique format for the problem ticket creation messages they support. This is the case with the eESM and MHD problem management systems. The problem ticket creation message for most target problem management systems includes the account name, event type, severity, identifier for source of problem and an identify of the support person or support group that should handle the problem ticket. Gateway/bridge program  31  then sends the reformatted problem creation message to the target problem management system using the Java DatabaseBase Connectivity (JDBC) protocol (step  130 ). Also, gateway/bridge  30  returns problem completion code data to the calling system (step  132 ).  
         [0011]     The target problem management system  34 - 36  or  37 - 39  then creates the problem ticket based on the data in the problem ticket creation message and returns problem completion code data to the gateway/bridge  30 . While there are various forms for a problem ticket, depending on the type of problem management system, they generally include the following information: account name, type, description, severity, and resource name. They also have a status field which can be changed as the status changes. They also have a support queue name.  
         [0012]     The target problem management system also identifies from the reformatted problem ticket creation message the identity of the proper support person or support group to handle the problem ticket, and notifies this support person or support group. The target problem management system also creates a return code in XML format which it sends to the gateway/bridge program  31  using HTTPS protocol. Gateway/bridge program  31  returns the return code to the event receiver program  12  within server  11  using HTTPS protocol. The possible return codes include “0” (success), “1” (web server unavailable) and “2” (problem management system unavailable), and also include a problem ticket number created by the target problem management system. Event receiver program  12  will automatically notify the operator at console or workstation  20  of this new problem at the target problem management-system, and specify the problem ticket number for future reference.  
         [0013]     Referring again to decision  126 , if the target problem management system (such as problem management system  40 ) is not able to generate a problem ticket based on a problem ticket creation message, then gateway/bridge program  31  sends the problem ticket creation message to problem ticket creation program  41  (step  180 ). In response, problem ticket creation program  41  creates a problem ticket by the use of an SQL call (step  184 ). The form of the problem ticket is suited for the type of problem management system, and is based on problem ticket form information maintained in a problem ticket form table  140 . Then, problem ticket creation program  41  sends the problem ticket to problem management system (“PMS”)  40  (step  186 ).  
         [0014]     Problem management system  40  also identifies from the problem ticket the identity of the proper support person or support group to handle the problem ticket, and notifies this support person or support group. Problem management system  40  also creates a return code in XML format which it sends to the gateway/bridge program  31  using HTTPS protocol. Gateway/bridge program  31  returns the return code to the event notification program  12  within server  11  using HTTPS protocol. The possible return codes include “0” (success), “1” (web server unavailable) and “2” (problem management system unavailable), and also include a problem ticket number created by the target problem management system  40 . Event notification program  12  will automatically notify the operator at console or workstation  20  of this new problem at the target problem management system, and specify the problem ticket number for future reference.  
         [0015]     After handling the problem (in part or in full), the support person at the target problem management station can call the operator at the console or workstation  20  (with the problem ticket number) to change the status of the problem ticket. The operator can then change the status by fetching the file corresponding to the problem ticket number and entering the new status (step  190 ). Console or workstation  20  then passes this new status as an XML status message to a callback program  150  within server  11 , and program  150  will then forward the XML status message using HTTPS protocol to the shared server gateway/bridge  30  (step  192 ). The gateway/bridge program  31  then reformats the status message to the format of the target problem management station, and the target problem management system will automatically update the status of the problem ticket.  
         [0016]     Refer again to decision  110 , where program  14  cannot request automatic ticketing of the event. This could be due to the absence of a rule in the rule base  111  for automatic ticketing of the event or insufficient information about the event in the event notification received from the customer computer system  15  or  17 . For example, there may be certain combinations of event types and account names which are not found in table  112 . As another example, the event type may not omitted in the event notification. In any such case where the event cannot be automatically ticketed, program  14  sends to console or workstation  20  (instead of shared gateway server/bridge  30 ) all the relevant available information about the event, i.e. event type, account, severity, identity of component where the event occurred and IP address (step  162 ). This information can be sent to the semiautomatic problem ticket program  18  through operator-initiated actions. Program  18  then fetches and displays a problem information form (step  163 ). The following are the fields in this form, and program  18  fills in whatever fields it can based on the information that it has received from program  14  (step  163 ). Then, the operator can fill-in any blank fields, such as those indicating the event type (or which support person or group should handle the problem), the event type or the severity of the problem, if not already supplied by program  18  (step  164 ). The operator also decides whether a problem ticket should be opened for this event (decision  168 ), assuming all the necessary information (i.e. account name, event type, severity, host name, IP address and queue routing) has been filled into to the form. If the operator decision is to open a problem ticket, program  18  creates a corresponding problem ticket creation message in XML format, and sends it to shared gateway server/bridge  30  in HTTPS protocol. At this point, gateway/bridge  30  responds the same as if the problem ticket creation message originated from program  14 . Likewise, the target problem management system and support person or support group will respond as if the problem ticket creation message originated from program  14 .  
         [0017]     Based on the foregoing, systems and methods have been disclosed for determining whether to automatically generate a problem ticket, and if so, which problem ticket management system should receive the event information and open the problem ticket and which support person or support group should handle the problem ticket. If the problem ticket cannot be automatically generated, the systems and methods notify an operator and assist the operator in initiating creation of a problem ticket. However, numerous modifications and substitutions can be made without deviating from the present invention. For example, a different problem ticket creation message format can be used in support of another problem management system. Therefore, the present invention has been disclosed by way of illustration and not limitation, and reference should be made to the following claims to determine the scope of the present invention.

Technology Classification (CPC): 6