Patent Abstract:
An image sensing circuit and method is disclosed, wherein a photodiode is formed in a substrate through a series of angled implants. The photodiode is formed by a first, second and third implant, wherein at least one of the implants are angled so as to allow the resulting photodiode to extend out beneath an adjoining gate. Under an alternate embodiment, a fourth implant is added, under an increased implant angle, in the region of the second implant. The resulting photodiode structure substantially reduces or eliminates transfer gate subthreshold leakage.

Full Description:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION  
       [0001]     The present invention relates to improved photodiodes used in pixels of an image array.  
       BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
       [0002]     CMOS image devices having pixel sensor arrays are well known in the art and have been widely used due to their low voltage operation and low power consumption. CMOS image devices further have advantages of being compatible with integrated on-chip electronics, allowing random access to the image data, and having lower fabrication costs as compared to other imaging technologies. CMOS image devices are generally disclosed for example, in Nixon et al., “256×256 CMOS Active Pixel Sensor Camera-on-a-Chip,” IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 31(12) pp. 2046-2050, 1996; Mendis et al., CMOS Active Pixel Image Sensors,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 41(3) pp. 452-453, 1994 as well as U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,708,263, 5,471,515, and 6,291,280, which are hereby incorporated by reference.  
         [0003]     However, conventional CMOS image devices have some significant drawbacks. When photodiode implants are formed within a semiconductor substrate of a pixel cell adjacent a transfer transistor to transfer charge from the photodiode, the resulting structure creates leakage problems beneath the transfer gate, particularly during charge integration, when the transfer transistor is off.  FIG. 1  illustrates a prior art pixel cell  750  with a n-type photodiode implant  705  set in a p-type substrate  915 , wherein the implant is on one side of transfer gate  701 , with a floating diffusion region  702  on the opposite side of gate  701 . STI region  707  is an isolation region which isolates one pixel from another. The n-type photodiode implant  705  forms a P—N diode junction above implant  705  with the p-type material which is over implant  705 .  
         [0004]     The photodiode implant  705  is typically formed using an implant angle θ( 706 ) in order to extend the implant slightly under gate  701  to provide sufficient conductivity between the photodiode n-region  705  and the channel region beneath transfer gate  701 . Once implanted, the resulting extended photodiode n-region  705  facilitates transfer of electrons to the channel beneath gate  701  and to the floating diffusion  702  when the gate  701  is on (e.g., a positive voltage applied which is greater than the threshold of the transfer transistor formed by gate  701  and implant regions  702 ,  705 ). However, as is shown in  FIG. 2 , when transfer gate  701  is off, residual charge from n-region  705  leaks in the direction of arrows  800  beneath transfer gate  701  to floating diffusion region  702 . This is due to the fact that the shallow angled implant results in a shape for n-region  705 , where a portion of the photodiode is in very close proximity to the transfer gate  701 . This proximity, while providing a good charge transfer when gate  701  is on, has the unwanted by-product of some undesirable charge leakage when the gate  701  is off. Accordingly, a better photodiode implant which provides good charge transfer when gate  701  is on, while lowering leakage when gate  701  is off is needed.  
       BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
       [0005]     The present invention provides a CMOS imager having a pixel array in which each pixel has an improved photodiode implant. The photodiode implant is created by tailoring the angle of a plurality of charge collection region implants so that the resulting charge collection region is positioned to provide a good charge transfer characteristic when the transfer transistor gate is on and lowered leakage across the channel region when the transistor gate is off. The photodiode charge collection region is formed through the successive implants into the substrate, some of which are angled, to minimize the barrier and in turn minimize the leakage.  
         [0006]     The above and other advantages and features of the invention will be more clearly understood from the following detailed description which is provided in connection with the accompanying drawings. 
     
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0007]      FIG. 1  shows a partially cut away side view of a prior art angled diode implant in a semiconductor imager;  
         [0008]      FIG. 2  illustrates the leakage occurring beneath transfer gate  701  in the  FIG. 1  arrangement;  
         [0009]      FIG. 3A  shows a first reduced-angle diode implant in accordance with a first embodiment of the invention;  
         [0010]      FIG. 3B  shows a second reduced-angle diode implant in accordance with the first embodiment of the invention;  
         [0011]      FIG. 3C  shows a third reduced-angle diode implant in accordance with the first embodiment of the invention;  
         [0012]      FIG. 3D  shows a supplemental implant to the reduced-angle diode implant in accordance with a second embodiment of the invention;  
         [0013]      FIG. 4  illustrates an electrostatic potential contour of the diode/transfer gate region formed in a substrate and the donor concentrations in accordance with a third embodiment of the invention;  
         [0014]      FIG. 5  illustrates an electrostatic potential contour of the diode/transfer gate region formed in a substrate and the donor concentrations in accordance with a fourth embodiment of the invention;  
         [0015]      FIG. 6  illustrates an electrostatic potential contour of the diode/transfer gate region formed in a substrate and the donor concentrations in accordance with a fifth embodiment of the invention;  
         [0016]      FIG. 7  illustrates an electrostatic potential contour of the diode/transfer gate region formed in a substrate and the donor concentrations in accordance with a sixth embodiment of the invention;  
         [0017]      FIG. 8  illustrates an electrostatic potential contour of the diode/transfer gate region formed in a substrate and the donor concentrations in accordance with a seventh embodiment of the invention; and  
         [0018]      FIG. 9  is an illustration of a computer system having a CMOS imager according to the present invention. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION  
       [0019]     In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized, and that structural, logical and electrical changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.  
         [0020]     The terms “wafer” and “substrate” are to be understood as including silicon, silicon-on-insulator (SOI) or silicon-on-sapphire (SOS) technology, doped and undoped semiconductors, epitaxial layers of silicon supported by a base semiconductor foundation, and other semiconductor structures. In addition, the semiconductor need not be silicon-based, but could be based on silicon-germanium, germanium, or gallium arsenide. Furthermore, when reference is made to a “wafer” or “substrate” in the following description, previous process steps may have been utilized to form regions or junctions in the base semiconductor structure or foundation.  
         [0021]     The term “pixel” refers to a picture element unit cell containing a photosensor and transistors for converting electromagnetic radiation to an electrical signal. For purposes of illustration, a representative pixel is illustrated in the figures and description herein, and typically fabrication of all pixels in an imager will proceed simultaneously in a similar fashion. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.  
         [0022]     Fabrication of a photodiode adjacent a transfer gate in accordance with a first embodiment of the invention will now be described. Referring to  FIG. 3A , a portion of a substrate having a p-type doping region  915  is illustrated, where a photodiode will be produced. It is understood that the CMOS imager of the present invention can also be fabricated using n-doped regions in an p-well. A transfer gate stack  940  is fabricated over the substrate region  915 . Any LDD source/drain implant associated with region  702  and with other transistors being fabricated on the same structure are performed and a photolithography resist  950  is then applied, having an opening  949  through which a doping implant for a photodiode can pass. The gate stack  940  contains a gate oxide and a conductor, where an insulator is placed over the conductor. The conductor may be formed from material such as poly-silicon, silicide, metal, or a combination. The insulator may be formed from material such as oxide, nitride, metal oxide, or a combination.  
         [0023]      FIG. 3A  illustrates a first n-type diode implant (PD 1 )  900 , formed in p-type substrate  915  through resist opening  949  at a depth indicated as  903 , wherein the depth  903  is in the range of 0.1 to 0.7 microns, preferably 0.1-0.5. The dopants for the implant  900  are implanted at an angle θ 1 , shown as arrow  910 , towards the transfer gate  940 . Angle θ 1  is measured away from a line normal to the surface of the sensor, as shown in  FIG. 3A . Angle θ 1  for implant  900  is set in the range of 0-30° normal to the surface of sensor  920 , preferably at 0-15°. Implant  900  is preferably a low energy implant, where the implant energy used for implant  900  is in the range of 5-200 KeV, preferably less than 100 KeV. The implant dose for implant  900  is in the range of 2E11-1E13/cm 2 , preferably 1E12-6E12/cm 2 .  
         [0024]      FIG. 3B  illustrates a second n-type diode implant (PD 2 )  901 , placed in p-type substrate  915  at a depth illustrated as  904 , wherein implant  901  may be set forward from implant  900  in the direction of transfer gate  940 , by a distance  906  as shown in  FIG. 3B . The dopants for the implant  901  are set at an angle θ 2  towards the transfer gate. Angle θ 2  is measured away from a line normal to the surface of the sensor, as shown in  FIG. 3B . Angle θ 2  for implant  901  is preferably set in the range of 0-30° normal to the surface of sensor  920 , preferably at 0-15°. Implant  901  is preferably a higher energy implant than that used for implant  900 , where the implant energy for implant  901  is in the range of 30-300 KeV, preferably 50-250 KeV. The implant dose for implant  901  is in the range of 2E11-1E13/cm 2 , preferably 1E12-6E12/cm 2 .  
         [0025]      FIG. 3C  illustrates a third n-type diode implant (PD 3 )  902 , placed in p-type substrate  915  at a minimum depth indicated as  905 , wherein implant  902  may be offset from implant  901  by a distance  907  as shown in  FIG. 3B . The dopants for the diode are implanted  912  at an angle θ 3  towards the transfer gate. Angle θ 3  is measured away from a line normal to the surface of the sensor, as shown in  FIG. 3B . Angle θ 3  for implant  902  is preferably set in the range of 0-30° normal to the surface of sensor  920 . Implant  902  is preferably a high energy deep implant, where the implant energy for implant  902  is in the range of 60-500 KeV, preferably 100-400 KeV. The implant dose for implant  902  is in the range of 2E11-1E13/cm 2 , preferably 1E12-6E12/cm 2 . Once formed, the implants ( 900 ,  901 ,  902 ) of  FIG. 3A -C collectively form an n-type electron collection  930  forming part of a photodiode with a p-type region  947 , residing over region  930 . Under the illustrations of FIGS.  3 A-C, at least one of the implants must be angled.  
         [0026]      FIG. 3D  illustrates an alternate embodiment of the present invention, wherein three implants  900 ,  901  and  902  are implanted into a p-type substrate  915 . The implants  900 ,  901  and  902 , are placed in substrate  915  in a manner similar to that described in the embodiment of  FIG. 3A -C, except that the implant angle for each of the implants (θ 1 , θ 2 , and θ 3 ) is reduced to a range of 0-5°, where at least one of the implants  901  and  902  has an implant angle greater than 0°. Once the implants have been set, a fourth light implant (PD  4 )  920  is made in the region of the second  901  implant, on the side closest to the transfer gate. The fourth implant is inserted  913  at an increased angle θ 4 , wherein the implant angle θ 4  is measured away from a line normal to the surface of the substrate, as shown in  FIG. 3D , and is preferably in the range of 10-30° of normal. Exemplary implant doses for the fourth implant may be in the range of 2e11/cm 2 -5e12/cm 2 . It is understood that the order of the implants ( 900 ,  901 ,  902  and  904  (if provided)) is not critical; each of the disclosed implants may be arranged in any order.  
         [0027]      FIGS. 4-8  show doping profiles in a partially cut away side view of angled diode implants for the implanted photodiode region  930 , wherein the various drawings illustrate the dopant concentrations resulting from different exemplary angled implants that may be used.  FIG. 4  shows a diode region  930 A that is formed in a substrate  915  as a result of the implant methods discussed above in  FIG. 3A -C. Specifically,  FIG. 4  illustrates a transfer gate  940 , surrounded by an insulating layer  102 , formed over a substrate  915 , which also has an implant n-type floating diffusion region  702 . Region  930 A represents n-type charge collection region of the photodiode formed in accordance with the three-implant process described above in connection with  FIGS. 3A-3C , wherein the implant angles of PD 1 -PD 3  are set at θ 1 =5′ for PD 1  region  900  (see  FIG. 3A ), θ 2 =5′ for PD 2  region  901  (see  FIG. 3B ), and θ 3 =30° for PD 3  region  902  (see  FIG. 3C ).  FIG. 4  also shows four concentration regions (I-IV) that are formed in the substrate as a result of the three implants at the specified implant angles (θ 1 =5°, θ 2 =5°, and θ 3 =30°).  
         [0028]     Region I, generally defined by the region above  130  and below regions  104  and floating diffusion  702 , has the largest donor concentration between the range of just over 5E16/cm 3  to 5E17/cm 3 . Region II, generally defined by the region between  125  and 130, has a lesser donor concentration between the ranges of just over 5E15/cm 3  to 5E16/cm 3 . Region III, generally defined by the region between  120  and 125, has yet a smaller donor concentration between the ranges of just over 1E14/cm 3  to 5E15/cm 3 . Region IV, generally defined by the region below  120 , contains the lowest donor concentration at or below 1E14/cm 3 . As can be seen from  FIG. 4 , the reduced donor concentrations found in region II near the transfer gate  940  creates a potential barrier wherein the amount of donor impurities under the transfer gate  940  is reduced. This reduction lessens the occurrence of short-channel effects or punch-through beneath the gate  940 .  
         [0029]      FIG. 5  illustrates region  930 B in accordance with another embodiment of the invention. Region  930 B in  FIG. 5  represents the diode formed subsequent to the three-implant process described above, wherein the implant angles of PD 1 -PD 3  are set at θ 1 =5′ for PD 1  (see  FIG. 3A ), θ 2 =5° for PD 2  (see  FIG. 3B ), and θ 3 =15° for PD 3  (see  FIG. 3C ).  FIG. 5  also shows four concentration regions (I-IV) that are formed in the substrate as a result of the diode region  930 B formed by the three implants at the specified implant angles (θ 1 =5°, θ 2 =5°, and θ 3 =15°).  
         [0030]     Region I, generally defined by the region above  131  and below regions  104  and floating diffusion  702 , has the largest donor concentration between the range of just over 5E16/cm 3  to 5E17/cm 3 . Region II, generally defined by the region between  126  and  131 , has a lesser donor concentration between the ranges of just over 5E15/cm 3  to 5E16/cm 3 . Region III, generally defined by the region between  121  and  126 , has yet a smaller donor concentration between the ranges of just over 1E14/cm 3  to 5E15/cm 3 . Region UV, generally defined by the region below  121 , contains the lowest donor concentration at or below 1E14/cm 3 . As can be seen in the electrostatic potential contour illustration, the reduction of the implant angle θ 3  from 30° to 15° from the previous embodiment has resulted in a wider expansion of Region II from the previous embodiment, directly beneath gat  940 , resulting in a further reduction in donor impurities underneath the transfer gate  940 .  
         [0031]      FIG. 6  illustrates a doping profile in accordance with a third exemplary embodiment of the invention, where a transfer gate  940  is surrounded by a insulating layer  102 , formed over a substrate  915 , which also having an implanted floating diffusion region  702 . Region  930 C in  FIG. 6  represents the diode region formed subsequent to the three-implant process described above, wherein the implant angles of PD 1 -PD 3  are set at θ 1 =5° for PD 1  (see  FIG. 3A ), θ 2 =30° for PD 2  (see  FIG. 3B ), and θ 3 =5° for PD 1  (see  FIG. 3C ).  FIG. 6  also shows four concentration regions (I-IV) that are formed in the substrate as a result of the diode region  930 C formed by the three implants at the specified implant angles (θ 1 =5°, θ 2 =30°, and θ 3 =5°).  
         [0032]     Region I, generally defined by the region above  132  and below regions  104  and floating diffusion  702 , has the largest donor concentration between the range of just over 5E16/cm 3  to 5E17/cm 3 . Region II, generally defined by the region between  127  and  132 , has a lesser donor concentration between the ranges of just over 5E15/cm 3  to 5E16/cm 3 . Region III, generally defined by the region between  122  and  127 , has yet a smaller donor concentration between the ranges of just over 1E14/cm 3  to 5E15/cm 3 . Region IV, generally defined by the region below  122 , contains the lowest donor concentration at or below 1E14/cm 3 . As can be seen in the electrostatic potential contour, the reduction of the implant angles θ 3  from 15° to 5°, and the increase of implant angle θ 2  from 5° to 30° from the previous embodiment has resulted in even a wider expansion of Region II from the previous embodiment, directly beneath gat  940 , resulting in a further reduction in donor impurities underneath the transfer gate  940 .  
         [0033]      FIG. 7  illustrates a doping profile in accordance with a fourth exemplary embodiment of the invention. Region  930 D in  FIG. 7  represents the diode formed subsequent to the three-implant process described above, wherein the implant angles of PD 1 -PD 3  are set at θ 1 =5′ for PD 1  (see  FIG. 3A ), θ 2 =15° for PD 2  (see  FIG. 3B ), and θ 3 =5° for PD 1  (see  FIG. 3C ).  FIG. 7  also shows four concentration regions (I-IV) that are formed in the substrate as a result of the diode region  930 D formed by the three implants at the specified implant angles (θ 1 =5°, θ 2 =15°, and θ 3 =5°).  
         [0034]     Region I, generally defined by the region above  133  and below regions  104  and floating diffusion  702 , has the largest donor concentration between the range of just over 5E16/cm 3  to 5E17/cm 3 . Region II, generally defined by the region between  128  and  133 , has a lesser donor concentration between the ranges of just over 5E15/cm 3  to 5E16/cm 3 . Region III, generally defined by the region between  123  and  128 , has yet a smaller donor concentration between the ranges of just over 1E14/cm 3  to 5E15/cm 3 . Region IV, generally defined by the region below  123 , contains the lowest donor concentration at or below 1E14/cm 3 . The reduction of the implant angles θ 2  from 30° to 15° from the previous embodiment resulted in slightly wider expansion of Region II from the previous embodiment, directly beneath gate  940 , resulting in a further reduction in donor impurities underneath the transfer gate  940 .  
         [0035]      FIG. 8  illustrates a doping profile concentration in accordance with a fifth exemplary embodiment. Region  930 E in  FIG. 8  represents the diode region formed subsequent to the three-implant process described above, wherein the implant angles of PD 1 -PD 3  are set at θ 1 =5′ for PD 1  (see  FIG. 3A ), θ 2 =5 for PD 2  (see  FIG. 3B ), and θ 3 =5° for PD 1  (see  FIG. 3C ).  FIG. 8  also shows four concentration regions (I-IV) that are formed in the substrate as a result of the diode region  930 E formed by the three implants at the specified implant angles (θ 1 =5°, θ 2 =5°, and θ 3 =5°).  
         [0036]     Region I, generally defined by the region above  134  and below regions  104  and floating diffusion  702 , has the largest donor concentration between the range of just over 5E16/cm 3  to 5E17/cm 3 . Region II, generally defined by the region between  129  and  134 , has a lesser donor concentration between the range of just over 5E15/cm 3  to 5E16/cm 3 . Region III, generally defined by the region between  124  and  129 , has yet a smaller donor concentration between the range of just over 1E14/cm 3  to 5E15/cm 3 . Region IV, generally defined by the region below  124 , contains the lowest donor concentration at or below 1E14/cm 3 . As can be seen in the electrostatic potential contour illustration, the reduction of the implant angles θ 2  from 15° to 5° from the previous embodiment has further expanded Region II from the previous embodiment, resulting in an even greater reduction in donor impurities underneath the transfer gate  940 .  
         [0037]     A typical processor system which includes a CMOS imager device having pixels constructed according to the present invention is illustrated generally in  FIG. 9 . A pixel imager array having pixels constructed as described above may be used in an imager device having associated circuits for reading images captured by the pixel array. The imager device may, in turn, be coupled to a processor system for further image processing.  
         [0038]     As can be seen from the process depicted in  FIGS. 3A-3C  and  3 A- 3 D and in the specific examples, a portion of the implanted photo-diode region  930  which is deeper into substrate  915  extends as much or less towards the transfer gate  940 , than a portion of the implanted photodiode region which does not extend as deep into the substrate. This reduces any short channel effect, as well as any associated transfer gate leakage, as compared to the photodiode implant depicted in  FIG. 2 .  
         [0039]     A processor system which uses a CMOS imager having pixels fabricated in accordance with the invention, for example, generally comprises a central processing unit (CPU)  1544  that communicates with an input/output (I/O) device  1546  over a bus  1552 . The CMOS imager  1510  also communicates with the system over bus  1552 . The computer system  1500  also includes random access memory (RAM)  1548 , and, in the case of a computer system may include peripheral devices such as a floppy disk drive  1554  and a compact disk (CD) ROM drive  1556  which also communicate with CPU  1544  over the bus  1552 . As described above, CMOS imager  1510  is combined with a pipelined JPEG compression module in a single integrated circuit.  
         [0040]     It should again be noted that although the invention has been described with specific reference to CMOS imaging circuits having a photodiode and a floating diffusion, the invention has broader applicability and may be used in forming a photodiode structure adjacent a transfer gate in any CMOS imaging apparatus. For example, the CMOS imager array can be formed on a single chip together with the logic or the logic and array may be formed on separate IC chips. In addition to transfer gates, the configuration is equally applicable to other gates, such as reset gates, global shutter, storage gate, high dynamic range gate, etc. Moreover, the implantation process described above is but one method of many that could be used. The implantation process can further be implemented on a variety of image pixel circuits, including three transistor (3T), four transistor (4T) five transistor (5T), six transistor (6T) or seven transistor (7T) structures. Accordingly, the above description and accompanying drawings are only illustrative of preferred embodiments which can achieve the features and advantages of the present invention. It is not intended that the invention be limited to the embodiments shown and described in detail herein. The invention is only limited by the scope of the following claims.

Technology Classification (CPC): 8