Patent Abstract:
A method is provided for imaging a workpiece by capturing successive frames of an elongate stationary field of view transverse to a workpiece transit path of a robot, while the workpiece is transported by the robot. The robot transit path is illuminated with an elongate illumination pattern transverse to the transit path to obtain a workpiece image of successive frames. Motion-induced image distortion is corrected by computing respective correct locations of respective ones of the frames along the transit path.

Full Description:
BACKGROUND 
     In semiconductor processing, systems are employed that can process a number of workpieces simultaneously. The workpieces may be semiconductor wafers for fabrication of ultra large-scale integrated circuits or display panels or solar arrays, or the workpieces may be masks employed in photolithography. For semiconductor wafers, the wafers may be robotically transferred at high speed (e.g., 1.7 meters per second) through a factory interface for transfer to any one of a number of parallel processing chambers or modules. The centering of the wafer on the wafer support pedestal within each processing chamber is critical and must be consistent. For example, one of the processing chambers may be employed to deposit a film on the wafer surface, while a small annular region or zone at the wafer periphery is masked to prevent film deposition in the peripheral region. This annular peripheral region may also be referred to as the film annular exclusion region. Film deposition in the annular peripheral exclusion region may be prevented by photolithographic masking during film deposition or by other suitable techniques. For example, the film layer may be removed from the annular peripheral exclusion region following film deposition over the entire wafer surface. Any error or inconsistency in the placement of the wafer on the wafer support pedestal in the reactor chamber can cause the film layer boundary to be non-concentric with the wafer edge. Such non-concentricity may cause the radial width of the annular exclusion region at the wafer periphery to vary with azimuthal angle, so that in some cases the width of the annular exclusion region may be greater or lesser than the width required to comply with the required production specifications. 
     Some attempts have been made to provide early warning of variations or error in wafer placement, by detecting non-concentricity of the film layer when the wafer is transferred to or from the processing chamber in which the film layer is masked or deposited. Most of these techniques are based on measurements or detection with the wafer outside the process tool. In-situ measurements of features on the wafer (such as non-concentricity or film-free annular region width) have been sought in order to save space in the fabrication area and provide more timely results. However, accurate in-situ measurement of the width or concentricity of the film edge exclusion annular region has been hampered by the high speed at which the wafer is transferred. Such high speed (and/or acceleration or deceleration) can cause the wafer image to be distorted from the true circular shape of the wafer. In the prior art, wafer images requiring high accuracy could not be obtained while the wafer was in motion. Therefore, an approach has been to slow down or stop the wafer motion while an image of the wafer is acquired from which the film layer concentricity and width may be accurately measured. This approach reduces productivity. 
     What is needed is a way in which the geometry of various surface features on the wafer (e.g., film layer concentricity and width) may be accurately measured without slowing down the wafer motion from the high speed at which the robot travels (e.g., 1.7 meters per second). Another need is for accurate imaging of a wafer in order to detect and locate defects. 
     SUMMARY 
     A method is provided for obtaining an image of a workpiece in a processing system including a robot for transporting a workpiece to and from the processing chambers of the system along a workpiece transfer path. The method includes capturing successive frames of an elongate stationary field of view transverse to a transit path portion of the workpiece transit path while the workpiece is transported along the transit path portion by the robot. The method further includes illuminating the transit path portion with an elongate illumination pattern transverse to the transit path portion during the capturing of the successive frames, and defining an image of the workpiece including the successive frames. The method also includes correction of motion-induced image distortion by computing respective correct locations of respective ones of the frames along a direction of the transit path portion, and correcting the image by defining the location of each frame in the image as the corresponding one of the respective correct locations. 
     In one embodiment, the elongate stationary field of view has a length of at least a workpiece diameter extending transverse to the transit path portion and a width on the order of one picture element of the image. 
     In one embodiment, the distortion correction is carried out by computing the correct location as a function of a ratio between a width of the workpiece in the respective one of the successive frames and a known workpiece diameter. 
     In a further embodiment, the distortion correction is carried out by computing the correct location from robot velocity profile information corresponding to movement of the robot. In this further embodiment, the robot velocity profile information is obtained either from a robot controller memory that contains data defining a predetermined robot velocity profile or from an encoder that is responsive to movement of the robot. 
     In one embodiment, the capturing includes capturing a signal from an elongate array of photosensitive elements, and wherein the illuminating includes providing an array of light emitting elements in a pattern that illuminates individual ones of the photosensitive elements through a range of incident angles. 
     In a yet further embodiment, the transit path portion corresponds to a Y-axis parallel to the transit path portion and an X-axis normal to the Y-axis, the method further including correcting X-axis coordinates in the image for distortion attributable to a misalignment angle between the field of view and the X-axis. This latter embodiment may be carried out by determining the misalignment angle by matching a motion of a wafer center location in successive frames to a function of the misalignment angle, and correcting the X-axis coordinates by a correction factor including the function of the misalignment angle. 
     In a yet further embodiment, the method further includes correcting the image for distortion from vibration of the workpiece in a plane of the workpiece. This latter embodiment may be carried out by finding the motion of a center of the wafer in successive ones of the frames, defining an average motion of the center of the wafer through the successive frames, and, for each frame containing a difference between the wafer center and the average motion of the center of the wafer, shifting the image by the difference. 
     In yet another embodiment, the method further includes correcting the image for distortion from vibration of the workpiece in a direction transverse to the plane of the workpiece. This latter embodiment may be carried out by determining an apparent workpiece radius from the image and determining a radial correction factor as a ratio between the apparent workpiece radius and a known workpiece radius, and scaling radial locations in the image by the radial correction factor. 
     In another embodiment, the method further includes smoothing movement of the correct location over the successive frames by fitting predetermined velocity profile data of the robot to the movement of the correct location to produce a fitted robot velocity profile, and obtaining the correct location for each of the successive frames from the fitted robot velocity profile. 
     In a further embodiment, the method measures non-concentricity by determining a center of the workpiece in each one of the frames, determining a motion of the center of the workpiece over the successive frames, matching the motion of the center of the workpiece to a sinusoidal function, and deducing a sinusoidal amplitude as an amplitude of non-concentricity of the workpiece and a sinusoidal phase angle as a direction of non-concentricity of the workpiece. These results may be used by providing the amplitude of non-concentricity and the direction of non-concentricity as corrective feedback to the robot. 
     In a yet further embodiment, respective wavelengths of light are emitted from respective parallel rows of discrete light emitters, wherein each one of the rows emits a monochromatic spectrum corresponding to a respective one of the wavelengths. In a first related embodiment, a particular one of the parallel rows of light emitters is selected for activation during capturing of the successive frames depending upon a type of material in a layer on the workpiece to be illuminated. In a second related embodiment, different wavelengths of light are emitted during capturing of successive ones of the frames by activating successive ones of the rows of light emitters, whereby to produce a color image of the workpiece. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       So that the manner in which the exemplary embodiments of the present invention are attained and can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to the embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be appreciated that certain well known processes are not discussed herein in order to not obscure the invention. 
         FIG. 1  depicts an exemplary wafer processing system including a wafer image capture apparatus in accordance with a first embodiment. 
         FIGS. 2A and 2B  are plan and elevational views respectively of a portion of the system of  FIG. 1  in accordance with one embodiment. 
         FIG. 3  is a bottom plan view corresponding to  FIG. 2A . 
         FIG. 4  is a bottom plan view of an alternative embodiment of the image capture apparatus of  FIG. 3 . 
         FIG. 5A  is a block diagram depicting a method of operating the system in  FIG. 1 , in accordance with an embodiment. 
         FIG. 5B  depicts an apparatus for carrying out the embodiment of block  172 - 1  of the method of  FIG. 5A . 
         FIG. 5C  depicts an apparatus for carrying out the embodiment of block  172 - 2  of the method of  FIG. 5A . 
         FIG. 6  is a block diagram of the process of block  172 - 3  of  FIG. 5A . 
         FIG. 7  depicts the raw image of a wafer edge distorted by motion of the wafer while being transferred by the robot. 
         FIG. 8  is a graph of the observed wafer width in pixels as a function of camera frame number, as used in a calculation of the maximum wafer width in the raw image. 
         FIG. 9  illustrates the geometry employed in a method of processing the raw image to remove motion-induced distortion. 
         FIG. 10  is a diagram depicting the geometry of the camera misalignment in accordance with one example. 
         FIG. 11  depicts a method of determining a misalignment angle of the camera from the image data. 
         FIGS. 12A ,  12 B and  12 C together depict a method of using the undistorted wafer image to measure non-concentricity of the film layer. 
         FIG. 13  depicts a method of correcting the image data for errors caused by wafer vibration along the X-axis. 
         FIG. 14  is a graph of the wafer center location along the X-axis as a function of the shifted frame number, used to perform the method of  FIG. 13 . 
         FIG. 15  depicts a method of correcting radial measurements from the image data for errors caused by out-of-plane vibration (along the Z-axis). 
         FIG. 16  is a graph of the geometry employed in the method of  FIG. 15 . 
         FIG. 17  is a simplified block flow diagram of methods of smoothing the undistorted wafer motion function. 
     
    
    
     To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the figures. It is contemplated that elements and features of one embodiment may be beneficially incorporated in other embodiments without further recitation. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only exemplary embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments. 
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
       FIG. 1  depicts a wafer processing tool that includes a vacuum transfer chamber  102  coupled to four wafer processing chambers  104 , all held at sub-atmospheric pressure. A vacuum robot  106  transfers individual wafers between any one of the processing chambers  104  and any one of two load lock chambers  108 . A factory interface  110  is at atmospheric pressure, and includes an atmospheric robot  112  for transferring a wafer between one or more cassettes  114  and the load lock chamber  108 . The load lock chamber  108  provides a transition between the atmospheric pressure of the factory interface  110  and the vacuum of the vacuum transfer chamber  102 . The vacuum robot  106  holds each wafer on a vacuum robot blade  116 , while the atmospheric robot  112  holds each wafer on an atmospheric robot blade  118 . The robots  106 ,  112  move each wafer along a wafer transit path  120  through the factory interface at a high speed of over 1 meter per second, e.g., about 1.7 meters per second. The robots  106 ,  112  are controlled by a robot controller  113  in accordance with stored instructions defining the velocity profile (acceleration, deceleration, direction, etc.) of each robot blade  116 ,  118  along the various wafer transit paths. 
     Each processing chamber  104  has a wafer support pedestal  124  on which a wafer  122  is either placed (or removed) by the vacuum robot  106 . The centering of the wafer  122  on the pedestal  124  can affect the concentricity of thin film layers deposited near the wafer edge, such as a film layer. This placement is affected by the placement of the wafer on the atmospheric robot blade  118  and by the placement of the wafer on the vacuum robot blade  116 , and/or alignment or centering of the photolithographic mask on the wafer. 
     An image capture apparatus  130  is placed at a fixed location over a selected portion of the wafer transit path  120 . Referring to  FIGS. 2A ,  2 B and  3 , the image capture apparatus  130  includes a camera  132 , focusing optics  133  and a light source  134 . In one embodiment, the camera  132  is implemented as a single line or imaging array of plural photosensor elements  150  depicted in  FIG. 3 . The camera  132  and the light source  134  may operate in the visible wavelength or in other wavelengths, such as UV, Infra Red or Microwave. In one embodiment, the light source may have a wavelength between 200 nm and 900 nm, for example. 
     The camera  132  has an elongate thin field of view (FOV)  121  having a length L (as depicted in  FIG. 2A ) that is transverse to the portion of the wafer transit path  120  underlying the line camera  132 . The length L of the field of view  121  is affected by the optics  133 . The optics  133  may be designed so that the length L of the field of view  121  exceeds the length of the elongate array of photosensor elements  150 . As shown in  FIG. 2A , the length L of the field of view  121  extends across the entire diameter of the wafer  122 . As depicted in  FIG. 2A , the wafer transit path portion  120  beneath the camera  132  lies along a Y-axis, while the length L of the field of view  121  of the camera  132  extends along an X-axis.  FIG. 2A  shows that the length L of the elongate field of view  121  is transverse to the direction of wafer travel (the Y-axis) in the transit path portion  120  in that it is perpendicular to it. However, in other embodiments the elongate field of view  121  is transverse by being disposed at an acute angle with respect to the Y-axis, or any angle between about 10 and 90 degrees. 
     An image control processor  123  controls the camera  132  and processes the images provided by the camera  132 . The camera  132  capture successive line images (frames) of the wafer  122 , and provides these images in succession to the image control processor  123 . A raw image of the wafer  122  consists of a succession of such frames covering the entire wafer. The image control processor  123  removes velocity profile-induced distortion from the raw image of the wafer. Further, the image control processor  123  may use the undistorted (corrected) wafer image to perform measurements of various features on the wafer, such as (for example) concentricity of a film layer deposited on the wafer, or to detect some features, such as water droplets or other defects. Alternatively, the image control processor  123  may use the distorted (uncorrected) wafer image to perform the measurements. In this alternative mode, the measurement data may be extracted from the uncorrected image, and the compensation for speed-induced distortion performed for each individual point or picture element (pixel). This correction may be performed by using a look-up table. Such a look-up table may be constructed in a straight-forward manner in the image processor  123  by correlating the locations of individual pixels in the uncorrected image with locations of the corresponding pixels in the corrected image. 
     In the embodiment depicted in  FIG. 1 , the image capture apparatus  130  is inside the factory interface  110  and overlies the portion of the wafer transit path  120  lying within the factory interface  110 . In an alternative embodiment, an image capture apparatus  130 ′ overlies a wafer transit path  120 ′ inside the load lock chamber  108 . The image capture apparatus  130  or  130 ′ may be located in any suitable location overlying a wafer transit path in the wafer processing tool of  FIG. 1 . 
     As noted above, the length L of the field of view  121  enables the camera  132  to capture individual images or frames that extend across the diameter of the wafer  122 . Each successive image or frame captured by the camera  132  is one (or more) picture element (“pixel”) long (along the direction of the wafer transit path  120  or Y-axis) and many (e.g., thousands) of pixels wide along the X-axis. The camera  132  captures one frame at a time. A succession of many such frames provides a raw image of the entire wafer  122 . While the drawing depicts a camera having a single row of pixels, in an alternative embodiment, the camera may have multiple rows of pixels. 
     The raw image may consist of an identification of the location along the Y-axis of each frame captured by the camera  132 , and, for each frame, a listing of the luminance values of all the pixels in the frame. As will be described below, the raw image of the wafer is distorted by acceleration or deceleration of the wafer occurring during image capture. This distorts the Y-axis frame locations in the raw image. In embodiments described herein, the distortion is corrected by replacing the Y-axis frame locations given in the raw image with correct Y-axis frame locations. 
     The side view of  FIG. 2B  depicts the light rays emanating from the light source  134  and the light ray impinging on the camera  132 . As depicted in the bottom plan view of  FIG. 3 , the camera  132  in one embodiment consists of a line array of individual image-sensing or photosensitive elements  150 , which may be individual photosensitive diodes, for example. Each photosensitive element  150  corresponds to an individual picture element or pixel in the captured image. Therefore, each photosensitive element  150  may also be referred to as a pixel. The photosensitive elements  150  are individually coupled to a transfer circuit  152  that assembles the parallel output signals of the photosensitive elements into a desired format (e.g., a serial succession of individual pixel values) and outputs the formatted signal to the image control processor  123 . 
     As described above with reference to  FIG. 3 , the light source array  134  consists of an array (e.g., a line array) of individual light emitting devices  154 . In one embodiment, the light emitting devices  154  are light emitting diodes. A light source electrical power supply  156  is coupled to the light source array  134  to power the individual light emitting devices  154 . In one embodiment, the light emitting devices  154  are of the same type and emit the same wavelength spectrum. 
     The light source array  134  of  FIGS. 2A and 2B  may be obtained from any one of a number of suppliers. For example, the following LED arrays may be used as the light source array  134 : an LED array emitting at a wavelength of 830 nm by Opto Diode Corporation of Newbury Park, Calif.; an LED array emitting at 620 nm by Stocker Yale, Inc. of Salem, New Hampshire. The line camera  132  may be a UM8 CCD camera from e2v Technologies of Essex, England, having 12,288 photosensitive elements or pixels (corresponding to the photosensitive elements or pixels  150  of  FIG. 3 ), each pixel measuring about 5 microns by 5 microns (in other words, 5 microns on each side). A CCD camera of this type may have a static resolution of 26μ/pixel, and a resolution of 70-80μ/pixel along the axis of motion (the Y-axis) where the motion of the wafer is about 1.7 meters per second. Nominally, the frame time may be about 50 μsec/frame and the exposure time may be about 35 μsec. 
     Generally, the camera  132  may have a static resolution in a range of 10-40 p/pixel, a pixel size in a range of 1-10 microns on each side, a frame width (along the Y-axis) in a range of one to five pixels, and a frame length (along the X-axis) in a range of 5,000-15,000 pixels. The camera  132  may be operated at a frame rate in a range of 10-100 μsec/frame and an exposure time in a range of about 5-80 μsec/frame. The light source array  134  may consist of discrete sources emitting at single wavelength lying in a range of 200-900 nanometers. 
     Each pixel of a high resolution camera of this type has a very narrow light cone angle through which light rays may be sensed. This angle may be as little as one tenth of a degree for each pixel. This presents a problem whenever reflections from the wafer are deflected from the intended incidence by wafer bowing, for example. Wafer bowing is common in such applications because the process chamber environment may be comparatively hot. As a result, light from the light source array  134  may not be sensed by the camera  132 . 
     This problem is overcome by providing an enhanced light source array  166  depicted in  FIG. 4 . The enhanced light source array  166  of  FIG. 4  mimics the light output of a diffused light source, providing light rays across a nearly continuous range of angles to each pixel  150  of the camera  132 . In this way, regardless of perturbation of the reflected light due to wafer bowing or the like, at least one light ray will fall within the light cone angle of each pixel  150 . In the embodiment depicted in  FIG. 4 , the enhanced light source array  166  has plural rows  168  of light emitting devices  154 . The rows  168  may extend a length which is different from the length of the camera  132 . The enhanced light source array  166  may have roughly ten light emitting devices  154  for each pixel  150  of the camera  132 , providing light from a different angle with respect to a particular pixel. Each light emitting device  154  (which may be a light-emitting diode) radiates light over a wide cone of angles, as much as 20 degrees, for example. Thus, the ten light emitting devices  154  in the enhanced light source array  166  of  FIG. 4  illuminating a particular pixel  150  provide light rays in a continuum of angles in a two-dimensional plane to the pixel  150 , so that wafer bowing or other perturbations do not prevent light reflection into the narrow light cone of the pixel. In this manner, the enhanced light source array  166  functions in the same way as an ideal diffuse light source. 
       FIG. 5A  depicts a method of employing the foregoing apparatus to measure or detect features on a wafer. The image capture apparatus  130  (stationary camera  132  and light source array  134 ) is employed to capture an image of a wafer as the wafer is being transported by the robot at high speed (block  170  of  FIG. 5A ) to produce a succession of frames including a raw image of the entire wafer. In one embodiment, the wafer motion continues at the high speed (over 1 meter per second) of the normal robotic transfer action during image capture. Next, an image processor processes the data of the raw image to remove distortion of the image caused by the velocity profile of the high speed motion of the robot-transported wafer (block  172  of  FIG. 5A ). The location of each frame along the direction of wafer transit path  120  or Y-axis in the captured image of the wafer is distorted by acceleration or deceleration in the wafer motion profile. For example, the image of a circular wafer may be non-circular. In one embodiment, the distortion is removed in block  172  by replacing the Y-axis location of each frame given in the raw image with the actual Y-axis location of each frame. This produces an undistorted image. 
     The edges of various features of interest in the distorted or undistorted image are located and various feature dimensions are measured or detected in the undistorted image (block  174  of  FIG. 5A ). For example, the edges of the wafer and of the film layer may be detected. The non-concentricity of a film layer edge relative to the wafer edge may be measured, and the radial width of a peripheral region lacking the film layer is measured and compared to the required width. The wafer image may be processed to search for and precisely locate features of interest, such as contamination or fiducial features. 
     The operation of block  172  may be performed in accordance with any one of different methods referred to in blocks  172 - 1 ,  172 - 2  or  172 - 3  of  FIG. 5A . 
     In the method of block  172 - 1 , the image processor  123  is provided information defining the motion of the robot blade  116  or  118 . The information may be stored instructions used by the robot motion controller  113  to govern the robot end effector (blade) motion. Alternatively, the information may be from a motion encoder coupled to the robot. In either case, the information is used by the image control processor  123  to deduce the true position of the robot end effector (and therefore of the wafer) and from that true position, compute the correct Y-axis position of the current image frame. The correct Y-axis position of each frame is combined with the image data of each frame to form an undistorted image. 
     The process of block  172 - 1  may be carried out by apparatus illustrated in  FIG. 5B  in accordance with one embodiment. In  FIG. 5B , robot motion information is obtained from a reliable source. This source may be a memory  182  associated with the robot controller  113  that stores instructions, commands or definitions employed by the robot controller  113  to govern the motion robot  106  or  112  and/or the robot blade  116  or  118  of  FIG. 1 . Alternatively, the source of the robot motion information may be an encoder  184  that may be an integral part of one of the robots  106  or  112  or it may be a separate encoder that is coupled to the robot  106  or  112 . A computational function  186  within the image control processor  123  uses the robot motion information from the memory  182  or from the encoder  184  to compute the correct Y-axis location of the wafer during the current frame, from which the Y-axis location of the current frame is inferred. An image processing function  188  within the image control processor  123  replaces the Y-axis frame location of the raw image with the correct Y-axis location determined by the computational function  186 . This operation is performed for each frame captured by the camera  132 . After all captured frames have been thus corrected, the image processor  123  outputs an undistorted image of the wafer. 
     In the method of block  172 - 2  of  FIG. 5A , the image control processor  123  uses robot motion information to govern the camera frame rate so as to prevent distortion of the wafer image acquired by the camera  132 . The image control processor  123  accesses information or data defining the motion of the robot as in block  172 - 1 . However, the image control processor  123  uses this information to deduce the actual velocity of the wafer along the Y-axis during the time of the current frame. The image control processor then adjusts the frame rate of the camera  132  in accordance with any change in wafer velocity following the previous frame so as to maintain a constant ratio between the wafer speed along the Y-axis and the camera frame rate. 
     The process of block  172 - 2  of  FIG. 5A  may be carried out by the apparatus illustrated in  FIG. 5C  in accordance with one embodiment. In  FIG. 5C , robot motion information is obtained from a reliable source. This source may be the memory  182  associated with the robot controller  113 . Alternatively, the source of the robot motion information may be the encoder  184 . A computational function  192  within the image control processor  123  uses the robot motion information from the memory  182  or from the encoder  184  to compute the wafer speed along the Y-axis for the next frame. A computational function  193  of the image control processor  123  computes a ratio between the camera frame rate and the wafer speed computed by the function  192 . A comparator  194  compares the frame rate-to-wafer speed ratio with the same ratio of a previous frame, and a frame rate computational function  195  determines a new frame rate for the next frame that will keep the frame rate-to-wafer speed ratio constant relative to the previous frame or frames. This new frame rate is applied as a control input to the camera  132 . The change in frame rate compensates for acceleration or deceleration of the wafer motion, so that the image acquired by the camera is free or nearly free of motion profile-induced distortion. The frame exposure time may be adjusted in proportion to the change in frame rate. 
     In the method of block  172 - 3  of  FIG. 5A , the raw (distorted) image of the wafer is used by the image control processor  123  to actually compute the correct (undistorted) Y-axis location of each frame. This is accomplished by first observing the wafer width in the raw image frame and then using the observed wafer width and the known wafer diameter to compute the undistorted Y-axis location of the frame. The image control processor  123  constructs a corrected or undistorted image by substituting the correct Y-axis location of each frame in the image in place of the Y-axis location given by the raw (distorted) image. 
     In one embodiment, the process of block  172 - 3  of  FIG. 5A  is not applied to correct the entire image of the wafer. Instead, for example, only a selected portion of the distorted image is processed, to yield data related to an undistorted image of only the selected portion. For example, if it is desired to calculate the width of the film layer peripheral zone, then only that portion of the image near the edge of the wafer is corrected for distortion by the process of block  172 - 3 . Thus, the result may not be an undistorted image of the wafer, but rather data relating to an undistorted image of a selected portion of the wafer. 
     Alternatively, the analysis may be performed on the undistorted image and correct for specific frame number or angular position using a lookup table. 
       FIG. 6  depicts the process of block  172 - 3  of  FIG. 5A  in detail, in accordance with one embodiment. In this embodiment, the true Y-axis location of each frame is computed as a function of the ratio between the wafer width in each frame and the known wafer diameter. The process begins by collecting the data of the raw image of the wafer (block  200  of  FIG. 6 ) frame-by-frame. As described above, each image frame produced by the camera  132  is one pixel wide and thousands of pixels long. A succession of such frames contains the image of the entire wafer. (In an alternative embodiment, the frame may be more than one pixel wide.) 
     The image of the wafer edge is obtained (block  202  of  FIG. 6 ). The wafer edge image is obtained by conventional edge-detection image processing techniques. The first and last pixels of the wafer image are then determined for each frame, yielding the wafer edge image depicted in  FIG. 7 . The graph of  FIG. 7  depicts the location (by pixel number) of the first and last pixels of all frames. The first pixels are indicated by symbols and the last pixels are indicated by dots, in  FIG. 7 . Distortion of the wafer shape due to acceleration/deceleration at the high robotic transfer speed during image capture is apparent in  FIG. 7 . 
     The wafer width in each frame is obtained (block  204  of  FIG. 6 ). The wafer width, w, as a function of frame number, f, may be defined as w(f), and is calculated as the distance between the first and last wafer pixels in the corresponding frame. The curve w(f), typically a parabola, is depicted in  FIG. 8 . 
     A maximum wafer width, w(f) max , corresponds to the wafer diameter and is determined (block  206  of  FIG. 6 ) from the peak of the curve, w(f), which is found using conventional techniques. The frame number in which w(f) max  occurs is also noted and defined as f max  (block  208  of  FIG. 6 ). 
     A pixel-to-millimeter conversion factor σ that correlates the distance between pixels (corresponding to individual light sensing elements  150  in the camera  132 ) and actual distance in millimeters on the wafer surface is obtained (block  210  of  FIG. 6 ). The conversion factor is obtained by dividing the maximum width in pixels, w(f) max , by the known wafer width, typically 300 mm. 
     The raw wafer outline of  FIG. 7  is distorted because the wafer acceleration and deceleration distorts the apparent location of each frame along the wafer transit path  120  or Y-axis of  FIG. 2A . Correction of such distortion may be performed by replacing the apparent Y-axis location of each frame with the correct Y-axis location. The correct Y-axis location corresponds to the distance of wafer movement along the Y-axis. The distance of wafer movement along the wafer transit path  120  or Y-axis is calculated for each frame from the wafer width w(f) measured in the particular frame (block  212  of  FIG. 6 ). The geometry employed in this calculation is illustrated in  FIG. 9 . The wafer transit path  120  of  FIG. 2A , established by the robot, is the Y-axis of  FIG. 9 . The general orientation of the line camera  132  corresponds to the X-axis of  FIG. 1 . The distance of wafer movement along the wafer transit path (Y-axis) as a function of frame number f will be referred to herein as a Y-axis location function h(f), where h denotes the distance and f denotes the frame number. Referring to  FIG. 9 , for a 300 mm wafer, the wafer width w for a given frame f is related to h as follows:
 
 W (in mm)= w (in pixels)·σ  (Eqn. 1a)
 
θ=2 sin −1 ( W/ 300mm) for  W&lt; 300mm  (Eqn. 1b)
 
θ=2 sin −1 (1) for  W≧ 300mm  (Eqn. 1c)
 
 d=W/[ 2 tan(θ/2)]  (Eqn. 1d)
 
 h ( f )=150mm−d for  f&lt;f   max   (Eqn. 1e)
 
 h ( f )=150mm+ d  for  f≧f   max   (Eqn. 1f)
 
     The foregoing may be summarized as follows: for values of W within the diameter of the wafer, the Y-axis location function is computed as:
 
 h ( f )=150mm− W/[ 2 tan(sin −1 ( W/ 300)] for a first half of the wafer in which  f&lt;f   max , and
 
 h ( f )=150mm+ W/[ 2 tan(sin −1 ( W/ 300)] for a second half of the wafer in which  f≧f   max .
 
     It is understood that the wafer diameter and radius values (300 mm and 150 mm) present in the foregoing definitions are applicable to a 300 mm wafer, and may be modified depending upon the diameter of the wafer being processed. 
     In one embodiment, the frame number f in the Y-axis location function h(f) may be defined such that the frame containing the leading edge of the wafer is frame zero, corresponding to the origin. The frame containing the leading edge of the wafer is identified (block  214  of  FIG. 6 ). It may be identified in one embodiment by first plotting the line number of each first and last pixel (found in the step of block  202  of  FIG. 6 ) as a function of pixel number for a group of frames near the wafer leading edge. The frame number containing the leading edge of the wafer corresponds to the minimum value of this function and is found using conventional techniques. The frame numbers of the Y-axis location function h(f) are then shifted so that the leading edge frame number is zero, in one embodiment (block  216  of  FIG. 6 ). 
     Optionally, the Y-axis location function h(f) may be smoothed (block  218  of  FIG. 6 ) in a process described below in this specification with reference to  FIG. 17 . 
     The raw image of the wafer, obtained from the succession of frames output by the camera  132 , is corrected for motion-induced distortion (block  220  of  FIG. 6 ). This correction consists of replacing the Y-axis coordinate of each frame by h(f). The foregoing correction to the Y-axis coordinate of each frame produces an image of the wafer in which distortion attributable to wafer motion profile (acceleration/deceleration) along the Y-axis has been removed, which image may be referred to as the undistorted image. This correction permits the image capture to be performed at high wafer transfer speeds without having to stop or slow down the wafer transfer during image capture. 
     The operation of block  220  may further include scaling and correcting the X-axis coordinate. The X-axis coordinate of any feature of interest in each frame is scaled by the pixel-to-millimeter scale factor σ, while accounting for a misalignment angle β between the major axis of the line camera  132  and the X-axis. The determination of the camera misalignment angle β is described later in this specification with reference to  FIG. 11 . The X-axis coordinate, X raw image , obtained from the raw image of any feature of interest is scaled to a corrected value X′ as follows:
 
 X′=X   raw image   ·σ−Y  tan β  (Eqn. 2)
 
     How to determine the camera misalignment angle β used in Equation (2) above is now described. The misalignment angle β between the long axis of the camera  132  and the X-axis ( FIG. 2A ) is depicted in  FIG. 10 , and may be relatively small (less than a few degrees, for example). A method in accordance with one embodiment for determining β from the undistorted wafer image is depicted in  FIG. 11 . The first step in  FIG. 11  is to inspect the wafer image to find a pixel location X 0  where the wafer first appears in the Wafer leading edge frame f lead  (block  310  of  FIG. 11 ). The pixel location of the wafer center X C  is computed for each frame (block  320  of  FIG. 11 ). The wafer center X C  is half the difference between the first and last wafer pixels referred to with reference to block  202  of  FIG. 6 :
 
 X   C   =[X   last pixel   +X   first pixel ]/2  (Eqn. 3)
 
     Next, the motion of the wafer center attributable to the misalignment angle is defined (block  330  of  FIG. 11 ) as
 
 P=X   0   +[h ( f−f   lead )tan β]/σ  (Eqn. 4)
 
     A conventional non-linear minimization algorithm is employed to calculate β by minimizing
 
Σ[ P−X   C ] 2   (Eqn. 5)
 
in which the indicated sum is carried out over all frames (block  340  of  FIG. 11 ). This minimization is carried out by adjusting β and X 0 . This operation corresponds to curve-fitting the motion of the wafer center X C  to a function of tan β. The calculated value of β (obtained by carrying out the minimization of Equation 5) is employed in the computation of Equation (2) described above with reference to block  220  of  FIG. 6  (block  350  of  FIG. 14 ), to correct the X-axis coordinate.
 
     In block  230  of  FIG. 6 , the undistorted image may be corrected for errors due to in-plane vibration or perturbation of the wafer motion (along the X-axis), and corrected for out-of-plane vibration or perturbation of the wafer motion (along the Z-axis). These corrections are described later in this specification with reference to  FIGS. 13 and 15 . 
     Various measurements may be accurately performed using the undistorted corrected wafer image produced by the foregoing. For example, the radius or diameter of a film layer may be measured (block  240  of  FIG. 6 ). Also, the annular width of a peripheral exclusion zone that was masked during film deposition may be measured (block  250 ). The concentricity of the film layer outer boundary with the wafer edge may be measured (block  260 ) using a method which is now described. 
     Referring to  FIG. 12A , a film layer  300  is deposited on the wafer  122  while being processed in one of the reactor chambers  104  of  FIG. 1 . The film layer  300  is disk-shaped and is intended to be concentric with the edge of the wafer  122 .  FIG. 12A  depicts an instance in which the film layer  300  is nonconcentric with the wafer  122 . The film layer  300  has a radius R 1  that is smaller than the radius R 2  of the wafer  122 , leaving a peripheral annular region  302  of the wafer surface that is not covered by the film layer  300 . The width of the annular region  302  is W M =R 2 −R 1 . Because of the nonconcentricity of the film layer, W M  varies with the azimuthal angle θ and is therefore a function of θ, W M (θ). W M (θ) is a sinusoidal function that is illustrated in  FIG. 12B . 
     The non-concentricity of the film layer is measured in accordance with a suitable process. An example of such a process is depicted in  FIG. 12C . First, the function W M (θ) is extracted from the undistorted image data (block  280  of  FIG. 12C ). A function
 
W M (average)+C cos(θ+α)  (Eqn. 6)
 
is then curve-fitted to W M (θ) (block  285  of  FIG. 12C ). This curve-fitting is performed using conventional techniques. The term W M (average) is the average value of W M  around the entire wafer edge. The term C is the amplitude of the non-concentricity. The angle α is the azimuthal orientation of the non-concentricity. From the results of the curve-fitting, the actual values of C and a are obtained and output as corrective error feedback to the robot controller  113  for correction of the motion of one of the robots  106  or  112  (block  290  of  FIG. 12C ).
 
       FIG. 13  depicts a method in accordance with one embodiment for carrying out the correction of distortion in the image attributable to in-plane (or X-axis) vibration in the step of block  230  of  FIG. 6 . First, the motion of the wafer center X C  is determined from the wafer image as a function of frame number (block  360  of  FIG. 13 ), which is the same operation as block  320  of  FIG. 11 . The motion of the wafer center X C  as a function of frame number is illustrated in the graph of  FIG. 14 . From the data defining X C  as function of frame number, an average value of X C  between the minima and maxima in X C  is determined using conventional techniques (block  365  of  FIG. 13 ). This average value is labeled X C (average) in  FIG. 14 , and generally follows a straight line, as depicted in  FIG. 14 . (The slope of the straight line X C  average) is a function of the camera offset angle β discussed previously.) The distortion attributable to X-axis vibration is removed by determining the difference between X C (average) for that frame and X C  for that frame, and shifting all X coordinates in the frame by that difference, namely the difference {X C (average)−X C } (block  370  of  FIG. 13 ). 
     In one embodiment, the foregoing correction may be made to the image to remove in-plane vibration distortions, and the resulting image used to perform a desired calculation (such as a calculation of the film peripheral zone width). In an alternative embodiment, the foregoing corrections are not applied to the wafer image. Instead, the desired calculation is performed on the image containing the in-plane vibration distortions, and then the foregoing correction is applied to the results of that calculation. 
       FIG. 15  depicts a method in accordance with one embodiment for carrying out the correction of distortion in the image attributable to out-of-plane (or Z-axis) vibration in the step of block  230  of  FIG. 6 . For each image of a workpiece, the apparent workpiece (wafer) radius R is determined as half the workpiece width determined in accordance with Equation 1 above (block  380  of  FIG. 15 ). A magnification ratio M is then computed from R and from the known wafer radius (e.g., 150 mm) as M=150 mm/R (block  385  of  FIG. 15 ). Thereafter, each measurement of a radial distance along a particular azimuthal angle  8  as depicted in  FIG. 16  (such as the location of the wafer edge, the location of the film layer edge, the width of the peripheral region  302 , etc.) is scaled by a magnification correction factor M cos θ (block  390  of  FIG. 15 ). This corresponds to a scaling of the image in polar coordinates by scaling the radius in accordance with the magnification ratio M. 
     In one embodiment, the foregoing correction may be made to the image to remove out-of-plane vibration distortions, and the resulting image used to perform a desired calculation (such as a calculation of the film peripheral zone width). In an alternative embodiment, the foregoing corrections are not applied to the wafer image. Instead, the desired calculation is performed on the image containing the out-of-plane vibration distortions, and then the foregoing correction is applied to the results of that calculation. 
     A process for smoothing of the Y-axis wafer motion function h(f), performed in block  218  of  FIG. 6 , is depicted in  FIG. 17  in accordance with an embodiment. The trajectory of the robot blade along the wafer transit path in the field of view of the image capture apparatus  130  of  FIG. 1  is obtained (block  400  of  FIG. 17 ). This trajectory defines a robot motion profile s(t) along the Y-axis (wafer transit path beneath the image capture apparatus  130  of  FIGS. 1 and 2A ). The robot motion profile sit), a function of time, is converted to a motion profile as a function of frame number by multiplying the time t by the frame rate of the camera  132  (block  410  of  FIG. 17 ) to obtain a robot frame number f r  for each value of time t. The converted robot motion profile, s(f r ) is a function of the robot frame number f r , having an arbitrary origin. The robot motion profile is then fitted to the wafer motion profile obtained from the wafer image data in the step of block  216  of  FIG. 6 , using either one of two different methods. Alternatively, the Y-axis wafer motion function is smoothed using conventional techniques without using the robot motion profile. One of these three methods is chosen (block  420  of  FIG. 17 ). If the choice is a robot motion-based method, then one of the two robot motion-based methods is chosen (block  422 ). 
     A first one of the two robot motion-based methods (branch  423  of block  422  of  FIG. 17 ) fits the robot motion profile by sliding the robot motion profile s(f r ) relative to the wafer motion profile h(f−f lead ) until a best fit is obtained (block  424  of  FIG. 17 ). This is performed in one embodiment using a non-linear minimization algorithm. The sliding of the robot motion profile is achieved by varying a robot frame offset that shifts the frame number of the robot motion profile relative to that of the wafer image until an optimum fit is obtained. The shifted robot motion profile is then substituted for the wafer image Y-axis motion profile (block  432  of  FIG. 17 ). 
     In an alternative robot motion-based method (branch  426  of block  422  of  FIG. 17 ), the foregoing optimization is performed but a constraint is imposed that forces the distance (in frame numbers) along the Y-axis between the leading and trailing edges of the wafer to equal the known wafer diameter (e.g., 300 mm). 
     An advantage of substituting the shifted robot motion profile for the wafer image motion profile is that the robot motion profile is derived from a predetermined continuous (smooth) motion profile defined for the robot. 
     As one alternative (branch  434  of block  420  of  FIG. 17 ), the wafer image motion profile is smoothed without substituting any robot motion profile, and instead conventional smoothing methods are employed using spline, averaging, interpolation and/or extrapolation techniques (block  436 ). The data may be smoothed beyond the edges of the wafer image (block  438 ) before outputting the smoothed wafer motion profile (block  432 ). 
     The apparatus of  FIGS. 1-3  may serve a number of different applications. For example, the image capture apparatus  130  may obtain the image of the wafer prior to its introduction into a particular one of the processing chambers  104  in order to obtain measurements of previously deposited thin film features, and then obtain another image of the same wafer following deposition of another thin film feature to obtain a second set of measurements that may be compared to the first set of measurements. This comparison may yield information useful in adjusting the processing of subsequent wafers. 
     As another example, after measuring the non-concentricity amplitude C and phase a in the manner described above with reference to  FIG. 12C , these parameters may be forwarded by the image control processor  123  to the robot controller  113  for use as error correction feedback to correct the action of a wafer placement apparatus of the robot (e.g., of the atmospheric robot  112  of  FIG. 1 ), so that the initial placement of each wafer on a robot blade provides a better concentricity. 
     The light source has been described above as a light source array  134  overlying the wafer  122  and on the same side of the wafer  122  as the camera  132 . However, for better contrast in the image of the edge of the wafer  122 , another light source  134 ′ may be placed underneath the wafer  122  so as to illuminate the wafer backside. In this way, the camera  132  would view a clear silhouette image of the wafer edge, with enhanced contrast at the edges of the wafer in the image. 
     The light source has been described above as an array  134  of light emitting diodes having the same monochromatic emission spectrum. With such a monochromatic source, the interference effects in the light reflected from the wafer  122  may be analyzed using conventional interferometric techniques in order to deduce the variation in thickness of a thin film deposited on the surface of the wafer  122 . The thin film thickness may be computed from the observed interference effects using conventional techniques. Furthermore, the thin film thickness may be computed for each one of a succession of locations near the edge of the thin film, and the change in thin film thickness observed and stored to define thin film edge taper profile. This taper profile in film thickness may then be compared with a 
       FIG. 3  depicts the LED array  134  as a single row of discrete light emitters  154  having a monochromatic emission spectrum. However, the light source or LED array  134  may have a spectrum consisting of two (or more) predetermined discrete wavelengths. In this case, the light emitters or light emitting diodes  154  of the light source array  134  may consist of two (or more) separate arrays arranged as parallel rows of light emitters or diodes, each array or row having a monochromatic emission spectrum different from the other array or row. Each array or row may emit a monochromatic spectrum at a different wavelength, and each of the two arrays may be activated depending on the wafer type or type of material in a layer of interest on the wafer surface, to ensure optimal contrast. Optimal contrast is wavelength dependent, as different types of layers or layers of different materials will reflect differently at different wavelengths. For example, one wavelength may be about 450 nm and the other wavelength may be about 600 nm. Alternatively the LED array  134  may have three rows of light emitters, each row emitting a different wavelength. The three wavelengths may correspond for example to red, blue and green, and each may be activated in synchronism with the camera, once every third frame, to provide a color RGB image of the wafer. 
     The measurements of film thickness may be compared with specified or desired film thickness values (or edge taper profile) and the comparison may be used to adjust one or more process parameters of one of the processing chambers  104  of  FIG. 1  (e.g., deposition time, temperature, precursor gas composition, etc.). 
     While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.

Technology Classification (CPC): 6