Patent Abstract:
A system and method for searching a knowledge base for a match answer and an alternative answer. The method includes the steps of: inputting a search term; beginning a search at a random location in the knowledge base to identify the match answer; determining a match answer category from the match answer; determining a look-up association based on the match answer category and a search history; plugging the look-up association into an alternative answer probability table to identify an alternative answer category; and performing a secondary search at a second random location in the knowledge base to find the alternative answer that belongs to the alternative answer category.

Full Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
       [0001]     1. Technical Field  
         [0002]     The present invention relates generally to search engines, and more particularly, to a search engine for a knowledge base that is capable of determining a match answer and an alternative answer based on a history record of cumulative probability values.  
         [0003]     2. Related Art  
         [0004]     Conventional search engines are located on a server side of a client-server environment. As a result, application of these search engines relative to knowledge bases that are located client-side is very difficult. For example, a knowledge base loaded to a portable digital assistant is incapable of searching unless communicable with a server-side search engine. Even if the client-side is readily communicable with the server-side search engine, processing delays such as database or application server requests (from client to server) affect performance. Performance problems are generally related to the Javascript or Perl front-end loaded nature of conventional server side systems and their related back-end DB2 or Oracle servers.  
         [0005]     Conventional search-engines also do not address locating exact information that a user requests since they apply very complex layers of software abstraction, e.g. the Berkley search engine strategy and artificial intelligence algorithms.  
         [0006]     Other disadvantages of conventional search engines are their inability to learn from prior searches for a user relative to a given knowledge base. That is, they do not readily provide user preferences relative to a knowledge base.  
         [0007]     In view of the foregoing, there is a need in the art for a search engine that is client-side, high performance and learns user preferences.  
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
       [0008]     The invention provides a search system and method that may be implemented in a client-side environment, provides high performance and creates user preferences relative to a knowledge base. The search system may also be natural language based. In addition, it is applicable to a variety of knowledge bases and can be adapted to other applications such as on-line help, interactive training, wizard functions, virtual chat sessions, intelligent bots, etc.  
         [0009]     In a first aspect, the invention provides a method for searching a knowledge base having a plurality of answer objects for a match answer and an alternative answer, comprising: inputting a search term; beginning a search at a random location in the knowledge base to identify the match answer; determining a match answer category from the match answer; determining a look-up association based on the match answer category and a search history; plugging the look-up association into an alternative answer probability table to identify an alternative answer category; and performing a secondary search at a second random location in the knowledge base to find the alternative answer that belongs to the alternative answer category.  
         [0010]     In a second aspect, the invention provides a user preference search system for searching a knowledge base to find a match answer and an alternative answer for a search term, comprising: a search engine that performs a first search at a first location in the knowledge base and returns a match answer, and performs a second search at a second location in the knowledge base to find an alternative answer, wherein the alternative answer belongs to an alternative answer category determined by plugging a look-up association into an alternative answer probability table; and a table update system that updates the alternative answer probability table based on a table of previously determined category answer associations.  
         [0011]     In a third aspect, the invention provides a program product stored on a recordable medium for searching a knowledge base for a match answer and an alternative answer, comprising: means for inputting a search term; means for beginning a search at a random location in the knowledge base to identify the match answer; means for selecting a match answer category from the match answer; means for determining a look-up association based on the match answer category and a search history; means for plugging the look-up association into an alternative answer probability table to identify an alternative answer category; and means for performing a secondary search at a second random location in the knowledge base to find the alternative answer that belongs to the alternative answer category.  
         [0012]     The foregoing and other features of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular description of embodiments of the invention. 
     
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0013]     The embodiments of this invention will be described in detail, with reference to the following figures, wherein like designations denote like elements, and wherein:  
         [0014]      FIG. 1  shows a block diagram of a user preference search system in accordance with the present invention.  
         [0015]      FIG. 2  shows organization of a knowledge base in accordance with the present invention.  
         [0016]      FIG. 3  shows a history table in accordance with the present invention.  
         [0017]      FIG. 4  shows an alternative answer probability table in accordance with the present invention. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION  
       [0018]     With reference to the accompanying drawings,  FIG. 1  depicts a block diagram of a user preference search system  10  that searches knowledge base  36  in response to a search input string, i.e., natural language (NL) command  12  and outputs a match answer  14  and an alternative answer  16 . Search system  10  may be implemented in any type of computer system that, for instance, includes memory, a processing unit, a computer program, input/output devices (I/O), etc. Knowledge base(s)  36  may be provided as part of search system  10  or separately. The features of search system  10  may be implemented as a program product that include: (1) a natural language (NL) parser  18  that receives the NL command  12  and generates one or more search terms  20 ; (2) a search engine  22  that receives a search term  20  and generates a match answer  14  based on a primary search  24  and an alternative answer  16  based a table look-up  28  and secondary search  25 ; and (3) a table update system  32  that maintains/updates a history table  34  and an alternative answer probability table  30 .  
         [0019]     In the example described herein, search system  10  may be provided on a client-side of operations with knowledge base  36  loaded to system  10 . An association history table  34  of user preferences, specific to knowledge base  36 , is utilized to generate search results. However, it should be noted that search system  10  could be configured to operate with a plurality of knowledge bases, each having an associated history table  34 . The natural language format makes the system  10  user friendly, and could be readily adapted to other applications, such as on-line help, interactive training, wizard functions, virtual chat sessions, intelligent bots, etc.  
         [0000]     Searching  
         [0020]     Knowledge base  36  comprises a database of possible “answer objects”  40 , as shown in  FIG. 2 . Each answer object  40  generally includes, e.g., a category, one or more target words  46 , a description, and a URL. Exemplary entries of knowledge base  36  are shown in  FIG. 2 . When a search term  20  matches one of the target words  46 , a hit occurs, and an answer (e.g., the URL, category and description) can be returned to the user. Often, a target word  46  may appear in many different answer objects  40 , so there may be many potential answers to an inputted search term  20 . The present invention seeks to limit the number of answers generated by search engine  22  to two answers, a match answer  14  and an alternative answer  16  based on recorded user preferences.  
         [0021]     To achieve this, search engine  22  includes a primary search  24  that initiates a search at a random location  42  in the knowledge base  36 . When a first answer object  40  containing the search term  20  is identified, a match answer  14  is outputted. Next, an alternative answer category  15  for alternative answer  16  is selected using category association system  26  and table look-up  28 . Once the alternative answer category  15  is selected, a secondary search  25  occurs beginning at a second random location  44  in the knowledge base  36 . The secondary search  25  searches for the search term  20  only in answer objects  40  that belong to the alternative answer category  15 . When a hit occurs, the alternative answer  16  is output. In the exemplary embodiments described herein, answer objects  40  belong to one of four categories labeled as Marketing, Products, Contacts, and Other. However, it should be recognized that any number of categories and/or labels could be used without departing from the scope of the invention.  
         [0022]     Identifying an alternative answer category  15  after the match answer  14  is found is accomplished in a two-step process as follows. First, category association system  26  determines a look-up association  17  for the match answer  14 . For instance, if the match answer  14  belonged to “category  1 :Marketing,” then category association system  26  would determine the best association, such as “category  2 :Products” resulting in a “ 1 - 2 ” look-up association.  
         [0023]     Once determined, table look-up  28  plugs the look-up association  17  into alternative answer probability table  30  to determine the alternative answer category  15 .  FIG. 4  depicts an example of an alternative answer probability table  30 . As can be seen for the case of look-up association  1 - 2 , category  1 :Marketing has a 100% ( 1 / 1 ) probability of occurring, and therefore would be selected as the alternative answer category  15 . For the case of look-up association  2 - 4 , category  3 :Contacts has a 75% ( 3 / 4 ) probability of occurring and category  4 :Other has a 25% ( 1 / 4 ) chance of occurring. Therefore in this case, category  3 :Contacts would be selected as the alternative answer category  15 . The process of building alternative answer probability table  30  is described below.  
         [0024]     As noted, in order to access alternative answer probability table  30 , a look-up association  17  must be inputted. A look-up association  17  can be determined in any manner. In one exemplary embodiment, look-up associations are determined from a history table  34 , such as that shown in  FIG. 3 . As can be seen in the left most column, all category association possibilities are provided, e.g.,  1 - 1 ,  1 - 2 , . . .  4 - 3 ,  4 - 4 . To determine the appropriate look-up association  17  for the category  13  of the match answer  14 , the sum of all entries for each association are examined, and the highest sum is used as the association. For instance, if the match answer  16  was in category  2 :Products, then the look-up association  17  would be  2 - 4 , since that association has the highest sum value, sum=4, of  2 - 1 ,  2 - 2 ,  2 - 3  and  2 - 4 . As will be described below, the history table  34  is maintained by table update system  32 , which is then used to generate alternative answer probability table  30 .  
         [0025]     In summary, the first step is to begin a search at a random location in the knowledge base  36  to identify a match answer  14 . Once the match answer  14  is found, a look-up association  17  is determined from history table  34  based on the match answer category  13 . Next, the look-up association  17  is plugged into the alternative answer probability table  30  to identify an alternative answer category  15 . Once the alternative answer category  15  is identified, as secondary search  25  is performed beginning at a second random location  44  in the knowledge base  36 , which finds the next occurrence of the search term  20  belonging to the alternative answer category  15 .  
         [0000]     Table Updating  
         [0026]     Whenever a user inputs a search, preference information is extracted and stored in history table  34 , such as that shown in  FIG. 3 . Specifically, a category association  27  comprising the match answer category  13  and the alternative answer category  15  (i.e.,  1 - 1 ,  1 - 2 , . . . , etc., shown along the y axis) is incremented for the match answer category  13  (shown x axis). Thus, for example, if the match answer  14  belonged to category  1  Marketing and the alternative answer  16  belonged to category  2 :Products, then the cell  1 - 2  under Marketing would be incremented. If the match answer  14  belonged to category  3 :Contacts and the alternative answer  16  belonged to category  1 :Marketing, then the cell  3 - 1  under Contacts would be incremented. Because the process is repeated for each search, history table  34  becomes more and more robust. The sums of each row can be maintained and updated as shown in  FIG. 3 .  
         [0027]     From the history table  34 , alternative answer probability table  30  can be formed by examining the cells in each row, and apportioning a probability to the cells. For example, as shown in the first row (i.e.,  1 - 1 ) of  FIG. 3 , the Marketing and Contacts category cells each have a value of 1. Accordingly, each of these two cells are apportioned a probability of  1 / 2  (i.e., 50%), as shown in  FIG. 4 .  
         [0028]     It is understood that the various devices, modules, mechanisms and systems described herein may be realized in hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software, and may be compartmentalized other than as shown. They may be implemented by any type of computer system or other apparatus adapted for carrying out the methods described herein. A typical combination of hardware and software could be a general-purpose computer system with a computer program that, when loaded and executed, controls the computer system such that it carries out the methods described herein. Alternatively, a specific use computer, containing specialized hardware for carrying out one or more of the functional tasks of the invention could be utilized. The present invention can also be embedded in a computer program product, which comprises all the features enabling the implementation of the methods and functions described herein, and which—when loaded in a computer system—is able to carry out these methods and functions. Computer program, software program, program, program product, or software, in the present context mean any expression, in any language, code or notation, of a set of instructions intended to cause a system having an information processing capability to perform a particular function either directly or after the following: (a) conversion to another language, code or notation; and/or (b) reproduction in a different material form.  
         [0029]     While this invention has been described in conjunction with the specific embodiments outlined above, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the embodiments of the invention as set forth above are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.

Technology Classification (CPC): 8