Patent Abstract:
A method for controlling an aircraft includes the steps of receiving acceleration data related to an acceleration of a front portion of the aircraft, and receiving pitch, roll, and/or yaw rate data related to a rate of a center portion of the aircraft. The method also includes a step of generating a pitch, roll, and/or yaw command based on the acceleration data and on the rate data.

Full Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     This application is a divisional application of published U.S. application Ser. No. 10/336,730, filed Jan. 6, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,669,139, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to French Patent Application 02 04334, filed on Apr. 8, 2002, the entire disclosure of both which are incorporated herein by reference. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     The present invention relates to aircraft with electric flight controls including a fuselage able to deform and vibrate longitudinally and laterally with the formation of vibration nodes and antinodes distributed along the longitudinal axis of the aircraft. It relates quite particularly to long-length airplanes which have high longitudinal flexibility. However, it advantageously applies equally well to airplanes of a shorter length and lower flexibility. 
     2. Discussion of the Background 
     It is known that an aircraft with electric flight controls has flight controls such as sticks, mini sticks, rudder bars, etc., which are equipped with electric transducers so that they generate electric flight control datums representative of the action that a pilot exerts on them. It also includes a flight control computer which, on the basis of the electric flight control datums generated by the flight controls and of flight control parameters originating, for example, from sensors, formulates electric commands that the flight control computer applies to actuators tasked with moving the control surfaces of the aircraft. 
     It is also known that aircraft with electric flight controls are provided with an inertial reference system (generally known as an IRS) including elements useful in navigation, such as the inertial unit, and elements useful in flight control, such as gyrometers and accelerometers. Finally, it is known that all these elements, whether they have to do with navigation or flight control, are grouped together in an IRS unit arranged at a given point on the aircraft. Of course, as a result, this IRS unit is subjected to the action of the deformations of the fuselage, which deformations occur mainly along the axes of pitch and yaw under the effect of the turning of the control surfaces or the effect of external disturbances. 
     Because of the high time constant attached to the elements useful in navigation, such deformations have only a small action thereon. By contrast, in order to get around the problems of interaction between the deformations of the fuselage and the elements useful in flight control, it is essential to have filtering means on the control surface control lines. 
     However, in the case of aircrafts with high longitudinal flexibility, the deformations become greater, which means that it is then necessary to perform extremely intense filtering of the control lines, and this introduces significant phase shifts thereinto and therefore detracts greatly from the performance of the control lines. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     It is an object of the present invention to overcome this drawback. 
     To this end, according to the invention, an aircraft with electric flight controls, provided with control surfaces able to be moved by electrically operated actuators, includes controls and at least one flight control computer. The controls are actuated by a pilot and generate electric flight control datums which are sent to the flight control computer. The latter computer generates, on the basis of the electric flight control datums and flight control parameters, commands in roll, pitch and yaw, which are sent to the actuators to move the control surfaces. An inertial reference system includes elements useful in navigation and elements useful in flight control, the latter elements being either of the gyrometer type or the accelerometer type. The aircraft includes a fuselage able to deform and vibrate with the formation of vibration nodes and antinodes distributed along the longitudinal axis of the aircraft. 
     The inertial reference system has an exploded structure with the elements useful in flight control separated from the elements useful in navigation. The elements useful in flight control are distributed along the fuselage. Each element useful in flight control, of the gyrometer type, is arranged at a vibration node of the fuselage. Each element useful in flight control, of the accelerometer type, is arranged at a vibration antinode of the fuselage. The elements useful in flight control are connected to the flight control computer so that the measurement signals they deliver are used as flight control parameters. 
     Thus, the accelerometers allow the measurement of the accelerations of the aircraft including vibrational movements of the fuselage, while the gyrometers allow the measurement of the rotation rates without incorporating the structural modes of the fuselage thereinto. These accelerometer and gyrometer measurements are sent to the flight control computer which in consequence formulates commands for the control surfaces. 
     The flight control laws incorporated into this computer therefore do not need to filter the vibrational movements of the fuselage. This is because the structural modes measured by the accelerometers can be actively checked by the flight control laws while the gyrometers do not measure deformations of the fuselage. In the most frequent scenario, the aircraft fuselage deforms and vibrates in such a way as to have a vibration antinode at each of its ends, and a vibration node near its center of gravity. 
     In this case, the aircraft includes at least one front accelerometer arranged at the front part of the fuselage and delivering a vertical acceleration measurement and a lateral acceleration measurement. At least one rear accelerometer is arranged at the rear part of the fuselage and delivering a vertical acceleration measurement and a lateral acceleration measurement. At least one gyrometer is arranged near the center of gravity of the aircraft and delivering roll rate, pitch rate and yaw rate measurements. 
     It is then advantageous for the vertical acceleration measurements generated by the front accelerometer and by the rear accelerometer respectively and the pitch rate measurement generated by the gyrometer, to be used as flight control parameters to formulate the pitch commands. The lateral acceleration measurements generated by the front accelerometer and by the rear accelerometer respectively, and the roll rate and yaw rate measurements generated by the gyrometer, can be used as flight control parameters to formulate the roll commands. The lateral acceleration measurements generated by the front accelerometer and by the rear accelerometer respectively, and the roll rate and yaw rate measurements generated by the gyrometer, can be used as flight control parameters for formulating the yaw commands. 
     The aircraft can include means of filtering the acceleration measurements and the rate measurement or measurements to eliminate measurement noise therefrom and avoid spectrum folding. The aircraft can also include gain multipliers for weighting each of the filtered acceleration or rate measurements; phase control means for the filtered and weighted acceleration measurements; and summing means for summing the filtered, weighted and phase-controlled acceleration measurements, the filtered and weighted rate measurement or measurements and the corresponding electric flight control datum to formulate the corresponding command. 
     The aircraft may also, for formulating roll and yaw commands, include means of integrating the roll rate so as to create information about the roll angle, which information is sent to the summing means after it has been weighted by a gain multiplier. 
     Of course, in such an architecture, all the gains are optimized so as to satisfy the compromises between performance and stability. It is also found that the architecture according to the present invention makes it possible to dispense with low-frequency filters, even though the aircraft might be very flexible. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       The figures of the appended drawing will make it easier to understand how the invention may be embodied. In these figures, identical references denote similar elements. 
         FIG. 1  schematically and generally illustrates the electric flight control system according to the present invention, the one example of an airplane with high longitudinal flexibility. 
         FIG. 2  shows, in schematic perspective, a civil transport airplane, with the locations of its accelerometers and gyrometers. 
         FIG. 3  is the block diagram of the pitch control system of the airplane of  FIG. 2 . 
         FIG. 4  is the block diagram of the roll and yaw control systems of the airplane of  FIG. 2 . 
     
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     The airplane  1  with high flexibility along its longitudinal axis L—L, shown in  FIG. 1 , can deform under the effect of the turning of its control surfaces or of external disturbances so that the main deformation of its fuselage  2  in the yaw and pitch axes is very significant at the front 3AV and rear 3AR ends of the fuselage  2  while the center  4  of this fuselage (at which the center of gravity of the airplane  1  is located) deforms little. In addition, the rotation rates associated with the deformations of the fuselage  2  are very small near the center  4  of the fuselage. 
     As illustrated schematically in  FIG. 1 , the airplane  1  includes: 
     an inertial unit CI, intended for navigation and arranged at any customary and appropriate point on the fuselage  2 ; 
     at least one front accelerometer  5  arranged at the front end 3AV; 
     at least one rear accelerometer  6  arranged at the rear end 3AR; and 
     at least one gyrometer  7  near the center  4  of the airplane  1 . 
     Of course, although in  FIG. 1  the accelerometers  5  and  6  and the gyrometer  7  are depicted on the outside of the airplane  1  to make the drawings clear, they are, in actual fact, housed inside the fuselage  2  as depicted schematically in  FIG. 2 . 
     The front and rear accelerometers  5  and  6  make it possible to measure the accelerations of the airplane  1 , including the vibrational movements of the fuselage  2 , these accelerations being measured in the form of their lateral components (NYAV in the case of the front accelerometer  5 , and NYAR in the case of the rear accelerometer  6 ) and vertical components (NZAV in the case of the front accelerometer  5 , and NZAR in the case of the rear accelerometer  6 ). Moreover, the gyrometer  7  makes it possible to measure the rotation rates of the fuselage  2  near the center of gravity of the airplane  1 , excluding the contribution of the structural modes thereof. These rotation rates are broken down into their three components P (roll rate), Q (pitch rate) and R (yaw rate) near the center of gravity of the airplane  1 . 
     Moreover, the airplane  1  includes: 
     at least one stick  8 , for example of the mini stick type, intends to be actuated by a pilot (not depicted) and associated with a transducer  9  generating roll and pitch flight control datums representative of the movements of the stick  8 ; 
     at least one rudder bar  10  intended to be actuated by the pilot and associated with a transducer  11  generating yaw flight control datums representative of the movements of the rudder bar  10 ; 
     at least one flight control computer  12  which, in the usual way, receives: 
     via links  13 , the roll and pitch flight control datums generated by the controls  8 ,  9 ; 
     via links  14 , the yaw flight control datums generated by the controls  10 ,  11 ; and 
     via links  15 , flight control parameters originating from sensors, other computers, etc. 
     Some of the links  15  connect the accelerometers  5  and  6  and the gyrometer  7  to the flight control computer  12  so that the measurements NZAV, NZAR, NYAV, NYAR, P, Q and R form part of the flight control parameters sent to the computer  12  via the links  15 . 
     On the basis of the roll, pitch and yaw flight control datums and of the flight control parameters, the flight control computer  12  generates commands which are sent to a number of actuators  16 . 1 ,  16 . 2 , . . . ,  16 .i, . . . ,  16 .n each of which moves a control surface  17 . 1 ,  17 . 2 , . . . ,  17 .i, . . . ,  17 .n accordingly. 
     It can be seen that the structural vibration modes measured by the accelerometers  5  and  6  can thus be actively checked by the flight control laws embedded in the computer  12 , while the gyrometer  7  does not take fuselage deformation into consideration. There is therefore no need, using these flight control laws, to filter the vibrational movements of the fuselage  2 . 
     As can be seen in  FIG. 2 , the accelerometers  5  and  6  are arranged respectively at locations  18  and  19  at the front end 3AV and at the rear end 3AR of the airplane  1 . Furthermore, the airplane includes: 
     an elevator  21 , articulated to the trailing edge of an adjustable horizontal plane  22 ; 
     ailerons  23  and spoilers  24 , articulated to the trailing edge of the wings  25 ; and 
     a rudder  26  articulated to the trailing edge of the vertical stabilizer  27 . 
     Of course, each of these control surfaces  21  to  24  and  26  corresponds to one of the control surfaces  17 .i (where i=l to n) in  FIG. 1 . 
       FIG. 3  schematically depicts the part  12 A of the flight control computer  12  corresponding to pitch control in accordance with the present invention and intended to control the elevator  21  and the adjustable horizontal plane  22 . This control is effected through front and rear vertical acceleration measurements NZAV and NZAR and the measurement of the pitch rate Q near the center  4 , which are sent to it via the corresponding links  15 . 
     In this part  12 A of the flight control computer  12 , each measurement NZAV, NZAR and Q is filtered by respective filter means  28 ,  29  and  30 , and weighted with a gain, by gain multipliers  31 ,  32  and  33  respectively. Such filtering, the purpose of which is to avoid noise and spectrum folding, relates to the high frequencies in excess of 10 Hz. It is therefore not penalizing to the performance of the pitch control. In addition, phase controllers  34  and  35  receiving the weighted accelerometer measurements NZAV and NZAR are able actively to check the structural modes of the fuselage  2 . Such phase control corresponds to an adjustment of the pitch control law, the adjustment being pegged to the phase of the structural modes, so as to increase their damping. The signals leaving the phase controllers  34  and  35  and the gain multiplier  33  are summed in a summer  36 , making it possible at output therefrom to obtain a pitch command that is a function of the three measurements NZAV, NZAR and Q. 
     Furthermore, this part  12 A of the computer  12  additionally includes a processing device  37  and a gain multiplier  38  for the pitch flight control datum generated by a control  8 ,  9  and sent to the device  37  via a link  13 . 
     This pitch flight control datum thus processed and weighted by the device  37  and the multiplier  38  sent to a summer  39  in which it is summed with the pitch command that appears at output from the summer  36 . 
     The composite pitch command appearing at the output of the summer  39  is sent to the actuators  16 .i of the elevator  21  and of the adjustable horizontal plane  22  to move these accordingly. 
       FIG. 4  schematically depicts the parts  12 B and  12 C of the flight control computer  12  correspondingly respectively to roll control by means of the ailerons  23  and the spoilers  24  and to yaw control by means of the rudder  26 . These two parts  12 B and  12 C of the computer  12  receive, via the corresponding links  15 , the lateral acceleration measurements NYAV and NYAR delivered by the accelerometers  5  and  6 , together with the roll rate P and yaw rate R which are measured by the gyrometer  7 . 
     In each of the parts of the computer  12 B and  12 C, each measurement NYAV, NYAR, P and R is filtered by high-frequency filtering means (frequency in excess of 10 Hz)  40 ,  41 ;  42 ,  43 ;  44 ,  45 ;  46 ,  47 , respectively, allowing the corresponding commands to get around problems of noise and spectrum folding without disadvantageous influence on the performance of the commands. In addition, the measurements are weighted using gains, by virtue of respective gain multipliers  48 ,  49 ;  50 ,  51 ;  52 ,  53 ;  54 ,  55 . Respective phase controllers  56 ,  57  and  58 ,  59  (analogous to the controllers  34  and  35  of the part  12 A of the computer  12 ) receive the weighted accelerometer measurements NYAV and NYAR so as to check actively the structural modes of the fuselage  2 . The signals leaving the controllers  56  and  58  and the gain multipliers  52  and  54  are sent to summers  60 . Likewise, the signals leaving the controllers  57  and  59  and the gain multipliers  53  and  55  are sent to a summer  61 . 
     In addition, in each part of the computer  12 B or  12 C, the filtered roll rate P appearing at the outputs of the filtering means  44  or  45  respectively is integrated by an integrator  62  or  63  then weighted by a gain multiplier  64  or  65 . Such integration actions make it possible to create information about the roll angle, which information is sent to the respective summer  60  or  61 . 
     Thus, at the outputs from the summers  60  and  61  there are obtained, respectively, a roll command and a yaw command each of which is a function of the four measurements NYAV, NYAR, P and R and of the roll angle information resulting from integration by the integrator  62  or  63  respectively. 
     The flight computer part  12 B additionally includes a processing part  62  and a gain multiplier  64  for the roll flight control datum generated by a flight control  8 ,  9  and sent to the device  62  by a link  13 . This roll flight control datum thus processed and weighted by the device  62  and the gain multiplier  64  is sent to a summer  66  in which it is summed with the roll command appearing at the output of the summer  60 . The composite roll command appearing at the output of the summer  66  is sent to the actuators  16 .i of the ailerons  23  and of the spoilers  24 . 
     Likewise, the part of the computer  12 C additionally includes a processing device  63  and a gain multiplier  65  for the yaw flight control datum generated by a flight control  10 ,  11  and sent to the device  63  by a link  14 . This yaw flight control datum thus processed and weighted by the device  63  and the gain multiplier  65  is sent to a summer  67  in which it is summed with the yaw command appearing at the output of the summer  61 . The composite yaw command appearing at the output of the summer  67  is sent to the actuators  16 .i of the rudder  26 .

Technology Classification (CPC): 6