Patent Abstract:
A method ( 700 ) and apparatus ( 600 ) are described for performing parallel decoding in connection with 2 M-1  parallel ACS unit in ACS unit ( 110 ), track buffer ( 112 ) and voting unit ( 114 ) in an Ultrawide Bandwidth (UWB) receiver having a parallel trellis decoder for decoding a message sequence encoded according to a convolutional code. Outputs from the track buffer can be input to a voting unit ( 114 ) where a voting scheme can be applied and a decision rendered as to the originally transmitted message sequence.

Full Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS  
       [0001]     The present invention is related to co-pending applications entitled “TRACK BUFFER IN A PARALLEL DECODER,” filed Dec. 30, 2004, attorney docket number XSI.101/10X-402 and “DECISION VOTING IN A PARALLEL DECODER,” filed Dec. 30, 2004, attorney docket number XSI.102/10X-403, the contents of both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. 
     
    
     FIELD OF THE INVENTION  
       [0002]     The present invention relates in general to wireless communication systems, such as ultrawide bandwidth (UWB) systems, including UWB receivers, mobile receivers and transceivers, centralized receivers and transceivers, and related equipment. More specifically, the present invention relates to a parallel decoder used in such devices to decode received UWB signals encoded according to a code such as a convolutional code.  
       BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
       [0003]     As ultrawide bandwidth (UWB) communication becomes increasingly desirable for wireless devices due to its speed and capacity combined with its resilience to interference within high-frequency bands, it is increasingly necessary to adopt effective error correction and related coding methods for maintaining step with the high accuracy demands associated with UWB communication. It should be noted that a UWB signal may be defined, in accordance with, for example, The Federal Communications Commission “First Report and Order, Revision of Part 15 of the Commission&#39;s Rules Regarding Ultra-Wideband Transmission Systems,” ET Docket 98-153, Feb. 14, 2002 as any signal occupying more than 500 MHz in the unlicensed 3.1-10.6 GHz band and meeting a specified energy spectrum or energy spectral density mask. As with many engineering challenges, two predominant constraints guide design activities associated with a UWB system: application speed and power consumption. To address these concerns, various coding schemes can be used to optimize speed and error resiliency while maintaining power consumption at acceptable levels. Thus coding performance and complexity are of great concern in UWB systems.  
         [0004]     Convolutional codes are a common choice for coding a continuous sequence of message symbols and provide useful coding performance for UWB systems. For many reasons, convolutional codes can provide power savings due to inherent characteristics of the code and because the error correcting capabilities of the code reduce the requirement for retransmission which can also contribute greatly to saving power on both the transmitter and receiver sides. As will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill, in a convolutional encoder, one message symbol of k bits can be encoded into one code symbol of n code bits, with k and n typically being small integers and with k&lt;n, resulting in a code with a rate of k/n. A typical encoder can be constructed as a shift register plus a series of n connection groups to n summing nodes which produce an n-bit codeword output based on a message symbol input bit and the contents of the shift register. The constraint length K of the encoder is generally taken to be the length of the encoder shift register plus one. Another common parameter used in describing encoders is M which is taken to mean the number of shift register or memory elements. Thus, in the case of a code with a rate of ½, and a constraint length of M=3 (K=4), a typical convolutional encoder for such a code can be described as, for example, a finite state machine (FSM) with 2 M , or 8 states.  
         [0005]     In a conventional trellis decoder used for decoding convolutionally encoded signals, the speed at which at which a codeword can be processed is proportional to the trellis depth, or the number of possible state transitions required to converge on the correct message word. Thus for code symbols received at a code rate r n , a decoding operation must perform fast enough to generate the recovered message symbol at the message symbol rate r k . Since, in a conventional decoder such as, for example, a trellis decoder, decisions are made only after the trellis is traversed and the surviving path calculated, the trellis depth can have a large impact on the processing speed required to meet the requirement of generating recovered symbols at the symbol rate. A trellis depths even as short as 2 or 3, double and triple the processing speed required to decode the message symbol at the original message symbol rate leading to unsuitable decoding speeds for high speed transmissions such as transmissions within the UWB symbol rate ranges. Since the trellis depth is a function of the constraint length of the code, and can affect the Forward Error Correction (FEC) capability of the code, along with other desirable features of the code, it would be desirable in the art for a method and apparatus for rapidly decoding a received sequence encoded according to a convolutional code without sacrificing the power savings and other benefits associated with code constraint selection. 
     
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0006]     The accompanying figures, where like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally similar elements throughout the separate views and which together with the detailed description below are incorporated in and form part of the specification, serve to further illustrate various embodiments and to explain various principles and advantages in accordance with the present invention.  
         [0007]      FIG. 1  is a block diagram illustrating blocks associated with an exemplary Ultra Wide Band (UWB) receiver in accordance with various exemplary embodiments of the present invention;  
         [0008]      FIG. 2  is a diagram illustrating an exemplary timing relationship between a received symbol rate and iteration rates required for decoding in conventional decoders using Add Compare Select (ACS) elements;  
         [0009]      FIG. 3  is a diagram illustrating path and branch metrics associated with an exemplary trellis node in accordance with various exemplary embodiments of the present invention;  
         [0010]      FIG. 4  is a block diagram illustrating inputs to an exemplary Add Compare Select (ACS) element associated with an exemplary trellis node in accordance with various exemplary embodiments of the present invention;  
         [0011]      FIG. 5  is a block diagram illustrating an iterative ACS processing configuration associated with conventional decoding;  FIG. 6  is a block diagram illustrating exemplary parallel ACS elements associated with parallel trellis decoding in accordance with various exemplary embodiments of the present invention;  
         [0012]      FIG. 7  is a block diagram illustrating exemplary parallel ACS elements associated with parallel trellis decoding of  FIG. 6 , connected in accordance with various exemplary parameters; and  
         [0013]      FIG. 8  is a flow chart illustrating exemplary procedures in accordance with various exemplary embodiments of the present invention.  
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS  
       [0014]     The present invention provides comparatively low complexity, low power consumption and high speed forward error correction (FEC) in UWB receivers through the use of decoding such as, trellis decoding, Viterbi decoding, maximum likelihood decoding, and the like, of a convolutionally encoded message sequence. The parallel trellis decoder reduces decoding time and decoding power consumption by eliminating the need to iteratively compute decoder trellis traversals and by maintaining a surviving path metric for a series of parallel computation units. Thus, decoded message symbols can be generated at approximately the symbol rate, taking into account certain latency, at reasonable power levels, an achievement which is not generally possible using alternate designs such as conventional iterative, that is, non-parallel, decoder designs including some designs which purport to be at least partially parallel. The present invention accomplishes fast decoding while maintaining acceptable power levels and error correction performance levels associated with convolutional coding.  
         [0015]     A series of stages in an exemplary receiver  100  is shown in  FIG. 1 . As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, convolutional codes as noted above are generated by subjecting a sequence of message symbols to coding operations in a convolutional encoder (not shown). The convolutional encoder applies n generator polynomials to the message sequence to generate a code word having n symbols for every message symbol. A typical convolutional encoder is configured either in hardware, in software, or in a combination of hardware and software, as a linear shift register with M storage locations and n different sets of connections between n respective summation nodes and various combinations of registers within the shift register corresponding to n respective generator polynomials. Each connection set corresponds to a generator polynomial and is associated with one of the n code symbol outputs associated with code words of the convolutional code. In a ½ rate code, for example, 2 code symbols are generated for every 1 received message symbol and thus 2 sets of connections to the encoder shift register corresponding to the generator polynomials for the code are used to generate the 2 code symbols for each code word.  
         [0016]     Each of the unique sets of connections to the input shift register associated with the n th  generator are exclusive ORed to form the code symbol for the n th  generator and the n code symbols from the n code generators are multiplexed such that n code symbols are generated for every k input symbols at the input symbol rate. Code symbols are transmitted at baseband frequency and received as a UWB signal  101  at an exemplary receiver  100 .  
         [0017]     As noted above and as shown in Table 1, in accordance with various exemplary embodiments, a message sequence can be encoded with a convolutional code with a rate of ½, and having a constraint length K=6 to achieve a good range performance for various modes. Given a code rate of ½, or a punctured rate of, for example, ¾ for optional modes, the choice of constraint K=6 offers an excellent performance vs. complexity trade-off, requiring, for example, only half the complexity of a code with a constraint K=7. It should incidentally be noted that a convolutional code used in connection with a convolutional interleaver can de-correlate initial demodulator errors, thereby maximizing the FEC benefits associated with the code.  
                                                         TABLE 1                           Data Rate   FEC Rate   Code Length   Range (AWGN)                                9.2   Mbps   ½   24   29.3   m       28   Mbps   ½   24   29.4   m       55   Mbps   ½   12   22.1   m       110   Mbps   ½   6   18.3   m       220   Mbps   ½   3   12.9   m       500   Mbps   ¾   2   7.3   m       660   Mbps   1   2   3   m       1000   Mbps   ¾   1   5   m       1320   Mbps   1   1   2   m                  
 
         [0018]     Table 1 shows supported data rates for low band operation in accordance with various exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The information in Table 1 is based on assumptions for range estimates that include transmit power adjustments for code word spectrum (transmit back-off of 1.2-1.9 dB), 6.6 dB CMOS noise figure for receiver, 2.5 dB implementation loss for data rates up to 220 Mbps (3 dB implementation loss for rates &gt;=500 Mbps) and the like.  
         [0019]     The UWB signal  101  can be received at an antenna  102  and input to an RF baseband UWB receiver  103  where soft decision decoding as will be understood to those of skill in the art can be performed on baseband signals associated with the UWB signal  101  to generate soft decision data  104  for input to, for example, a correlator/branch metrics block  105 . It will be appreciated that during correlation, branch metrics can be generated identifying the Euclidian distance for the possible combination of the 2 prospective received code bits. Thus, four branch metric values associated with the four possible combinations of the two soft decision bits are shown as b( 11 )  106 , b( 10 )  107 , b( 01 )  108  and b( 00 )  109  are generated in the correlator/branch metrics block  105  and input with their respective distances or metric values to Add Compare Select (ACS) path metric block  110 . It will be appreciated that the branch metric values will be used in the ACS path metric block  110  based on a butterfly connection associated with the particular code parameters. Surviving path metrics are calculated in the individual parallel ACS elements as will be described in greater detail herein after.  
         [0020]     When surviving states or path metrics are selected in a series of parallel or butterfly connected ACS elements, the states or metrics accumulated in a corresponding series of registers in an exemplary track buffer  112  which is described in greater detail in the related, co-pending application entitled “TRACK BUFFER IN A PARALLEL DECODER” attorney docket number XSI.101/10X-402 noted herein above. As more information is received by cycling or spinning the ACS units on the present received symbol, the accumulated surviving path metrics can be rearranged in the track buffer using register exchange techniques within the track buffer. The contents of the track buffer will contain decisions regarding the best estimate of the output symbol for each track corresponding to the outputs of the ACS units. The decisions represent the symbol regarded by operation of branch metric calculation for each ACS unit as the maximum likelihood received symbol. In addition, a voting block  114  which is the subject of the related, co-pending application entitled DECISION VOTING IN A PARALLEL DECODER” attorney docket number XSI.102/10X-403 as noted above, can be configured to analyze the contents of the track buffer  112  after a number of cycles and determine an output decision symbol. It should be noted that while the present invention is directed primarily to parallel ACS decoding, some aspects of the track buffering and voting will be discussed but only, for example, as they relate to parallel decoding.  
         [0021]     It is important to note that in a conventional trellis decoder, as shown for example in  FIG. 2 , inputs  202  are applied to a decoder or processor  200  having an iterative ACS calculator  201 . A review of the operation of the iterative ACS path metric calculator  201  in comparison to, for example, the output of symbols at output  203 , reveals that for symbols output at a symbol rate  204 , an n-cycle iteration rate  205  is necessary such that an n-stage trellis can be traversed within the processor  200  in order to generate a decision or output symbol at the symbol rate  204 . It can be easily appreciated that for data or symbol rates requiring support under UWB specifications, the n-cycle iteration rate  205  would have to be inordinately fast in order to generate a decision or output symbol at UWB data rates. Also even if the iteration rate was sufficiently fast, the computational complexity of the iterative ACS calculations is unacceptably power consuming. While some documents have described so-called parallel processing cores in relation to ACS decoders, such as in connection with the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineering P802.15 working group document P802.15-03/213r0r0, entitled “Implementation of High Speed Signal Processing Cores for 15-3a UWB” dated May 10, 2003, these documents fail to describe a complete parallel connected (butterfly connected) series of ACS elements. In contrast the present invention can be configured for, a UWB system where constraint 2 M-1  parallel connected ACS elements can be present such as in accordance with various exemplary embodiments of the present invention.  
         [0000]     Trellis Decoding  
         [0022]     As will also be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art, a trellis diagram is a useful tool for understanding trellis or Viterbi decoding in accordance with various exemplary embodiments. In a code trellis, rows and columns signify states and stages of operation in accordance with the underlying convolutional code and related FSM. When code words or branch metrics are received, several paths through the trellis can be traversed based on hypothetical state transitions from the present state to the next state for each of a series of possible received sequences. The state transitions will further generate a the most likely corresponding message symbol or sequence associated with the received code sequence. As noted, the rows of an exemplary trellis represent the individual ones of the 2 M  code states and the columns represent the stages associated with each subsequent received code word during code word intervals. Just as the convolutional encoder, for an exemplary ½ rate code, encoded 2 code symbols (a code word) for each message symbol input to the encoder shift register, the convolutional decoder will attempt to determine the most likely message symbol corresponding to a received code word of by calculating metrics associated with each node in the trellis. As the stages are traversed, distance metrics are accumulated and paths with large metrics are abandoned so that by the “end” of the trellis, that is at the last stage, a path traced back through the trellis will reveal the surviving path and the original message sequence. As noted earlier, in a UWB receiver, waiting until all code words are received is impractical due to the limitations posed by processing speed and symbol rate.  
         [0023]     An exemplary trellis node  300  is illustrated in  FIG. 3 . It should be understood that the diagram of exemplary node  300  is a conceptual representation including the inputs and calculations and can be applied generally with each state/stage node in the exemplary decoding trellis. At  310 , a path metric P 2j (t-1) represents the path metric value carried from the previous stage, that is (t-1) from state  2   j . At  312 , a path metric P 2j+1 (t-1) represents the path metric value carried forward from the previous stage (t-1) from state  2   j+ 1. At  311 , a branch metric b 2j,j (r(t)) represents the branch metric associated with a possible traversal of the branch from state  2   j  to state j given a value r(t) of the received code word. At  315 , a branch metric b 2j+1,j (r(t)) represents the branch metric associated with a possible traversal of the branch from state  2   j+ 1 to state j given a value r(t) of the received code word. Thus at  314 , a path metric P j (t) represents the updated path metric for the current stage (t). If the branch  2   j,j  is traversed, the value at  314  will be the value of the accumulated path metric P 2j (t-1) at  310  and the value of the branch metric b 2j,j (r(t)) at  311  which is generally the Euclidean distance between the actually received code word and the code state value at j. If the branch  2   j+ 1,j is traversed, the value at  314  will be the value of the accumulated path metric P 2j+1 (t-1) at  312  and the value of the branch metric b 2j+1,j  (r(t)) at  315  which, as noted, is the Euclidean distance between the actually received code word and the code state value at j. It will be appreciated that the branch metrics can be obtained from the output of correlator/branch metric block  105  described in connection with  FIG. 1 . Although the exemplary correlator/branch metric block  105  is shown outputting four branch metrics, more can be output depending on the constraint length chosen and the resulting number of code states. In accordance, for example with various exemplary and alternative exemplary embodiments, it has been determined that the decoder of the present invention can use a constraint length of K=6 as noted herein, for achieving superior performance characteristics.  
         [0024]     From states  2   j  and  2   j+ 1, transitions can also be made to state j+2 M  through respective branches, the branch from state  2   j  having a branch metric b 2j,j+2   M  (r(t)) at  313  and the branch from state  2   j+ 1 having a branch metric b 2j+1, j+2   M  (r(t)) at  317 . Thus the value of a path metric P j+2   M  (t) at  316 , if the branch from  2   j,j+ 2 M  is traversed, is the value of the accumulated path metric P 2j (t-1) at  310  and the value of the branch metric b 2j,j+2   M-1  (r(t)) at  313  which is generally the Euclidean distance between the actually received code word and the code state value at j+2 M-1 . If the branch from  2   j+ 1, j+2 M-1  is traversed, the value of the path metric P j+2   M-1  (t) at  316  is the value of the accumulated path metric P 2j+1 (t-1) at  312  and the value of the branch metric b 2j+1, j+2   M-1  (r(t)) at  317  which is generally the Euclidean distance between the actually received code word and the code state value at j+2 M-1 .  
         [0000]     Add Compare Select (ACS)  
         [0025]     In traversing an exemplary trellis associated with  FIG. 3 , various constructs can be used to accomplish the required calculations. One construct is an exemplary Add Compare Select (ACS) circuit  400  shown in  FIG. 4 . It will be appreciated that ACS circuit  400  can be used to implement the trellis node of  FIG. 3 . A path metric value P 2j (t-1) at  421  and a path metric value P 2j+1 (t-1) at  422  can be input to an ADD element  401  and an ADD element  402  respectively. Branch metric values, such as a branch metric value b 2j,j (r(t))  423  and a branch metric value b 2j, j+2   M-1  (r(t))  425  can be input to the ADD element  401  and a branch metric value b 2j+1, j+2   M-1  (r(t))  424  and a branch metric value b 2j+1,j (r(t))  426  can be input to the ADD element  402  the results of various combinations of calculations for traversed branches can be compared in COMPARE element  403  which can be configured to select using a SELECT line  429  one of a path metric P j (t)  427  and a path metric P j+2   M-1  (t)  428  as a surviving path.  
         [0026]     As previously noted, conventional decoders suffer limitations in that in order to achieve decoding at the symbol rate, the decoder must iterate in order to traverse a trellis, at a rate proportional to K times the symbol rate.  FIG. 5  shows a conventional ACS circuit  500  having an input multiplexer  501 , an ACS unit  502 , and a demultiplexer  503 . Input paths representing path metrics from P 0 (t-1)  504  to P 2   M  (t-1)  505  can be selected for each iteration corresponding for example to each stage for comparison in the ACS unit  502  and a selection made in demulitiplexer  503  of surviving path metrics P 0 (t)  506  to P 2   M  (t)  507 . The limitation of such a circuit, as previously noted, is that at symbol rates typically associated with UWB transmissions, the ACS unit  502  would need to iterate at least several time faster than the symbol rate. At best, the conventional ACS unit  502  as noted above, could be configured to process two paths, however this can easily be distinguished from the present invention in that prior art decoders such as decoder  500  of  FIG. 5 .  
         [0000]     Parallel ACS  
         [0027]     Although as noted, some discussion exists related to the possible feasibility of processing 2 samples, e.g. branch metrics, in parallel (see, IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks, (WPANs) document P802.15-03/213r0r0, entitled “Implementation of High Speed Signal Processing Cores for 15-3a UWB, May 10, 2003), none shows specifically how parallel decoding is accomplished, and all fail to describe individual ACS units connected in parallel to reduce the iteration rate to a value at or near the symbol rate. The document further admits the existence of limitations, for example at above 240 Mbps if such a decoder could be constructed. Also, given the constraints described in various documents in the art, such as K=7, the complexity levels become undesirable as noted, for example, in the discussion herein above. In stark contrast, using the principals discussed and described herein, a parallel trellis decoder can be constructed for providing full symbol rate decoding at 480 Mbps and potentially beyond.  
         [0028]      FIG. 6  illustrates an exemplary parallel ACS circuit  600  constructed for implementation in, for example, an integrated circuit in a UWB receiver or receiver section such as the ACS branch metrics unit  110  described herein above. In the parallel ACS circuit  600 , a series of parallel ACS elements from a first ACS 0  element  601  through a (M-1) th  ACS 2   M-1   −1  element  602  can receive respective parallel path metric inputs P 0 (t-1)  611 , P 1 (t-1)  612  and P 2   M   −2 (t-1)  621 , P 2   M   −1 (t-1)  622 . Each of the parallel ACS elements such as the ACS 0  element  601  and the ACS 2   M-1   −1  element  602 , after computing branch metrics in the manner described above in connection with  FIG. 4 , generate parallel path outputs P 0 (t)  613 , P 2   M-1 (t)  614  and P 2   M-1   −1 (t)  623 , P 2   M (t)  624  which are shown schematically in open form as, for example, a butterfly connection as is illustrated in greater detail in  FIG. 7 .  
         [0029]     An exemplary decoder, for illustrative purposes, is shown in  FIG. 7  for a value of M=3. Accordingly, 2 M-1  or 4 ACS units, such as ACS unit (11)    710 , ACS unit (10)    720 , ACS unit (01)    730 , ACS unit (00)    740 , can be parallel, or butterfly connected according to, for example, the configuration as illustrated in  FIG. 6  and the particular generator polynomial used for encoding, and can be used to provide decoding for an exemplary convolutional code with 2 M  or 8 states. It will be appreciated that for various systems and codes, different values of M will result in a different number of ACS units. Further, different generator polynomials, for the same values of M, will result in different butterfly connections between parallel elements, such as ACS unit (11)    710 , ACS unit (10)    720 , ACS unit (01)    730 , ACS unit (00)    740 .  
         [0030]     In order to calculate surviving path metrics, branch metric values b (01)    701 , b (11)    702 , b (10)    703 , and b (00)    704 , representing for example, the distance metric associated with the present received sequence r(t) and the respective possible sequences of the sequences in the soft decision constellation as will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill, are made available to the ACS units according to for example the relationships illustrated in accordance with  FIG. 4  and as shown in  FIG. 7 . It will be appreciated that inputs to parallel ACS unit (11)    710 , ACS unit (10)    720 , ACS unit (01)    730 , ACS unit (00)    740  can consist of feedback inputs  711 ,  712 ,  721 ,  722 ,  731 ,  732 ,  741 , and  742 , such as from the previous path metric values, branch metric values b (01)    701 , b (11)    702 , b (10)    703 , and b (00)    704 , and state inputs which may be loaded during decoder initialization and the like.  
         [0031]     Each ACS unit  710 - 740  also produces two decision signals  713  &amp;  714 ,  723  &amp;  724 ,  733  &amp;  734 , or  743  &amp;  744  that are used to control the operation of the track buffer  750 . These decision signals are Boolean signals that are indicative of which path metric was selected by the ACS unit  710 - 740 . The track buffer  750  uses these decision signals  713 ,  714 ,  723 ,  724 ,  733 ,  734 ,  743 , and  744  to determine how it will manipulate stored values.  
         [0032]     It should be noted that the clock rate for an exemplary processor in accordance with various embodiments, is 8.8 nanoseconds and further track buffer  750  may be provided with a spin signal  751  such as a clock signal, cycle signal, or the like at around the processor clock speed to allow the contents of the track buffer to be updated through register exchange or the like as is described in greater detail in copending application “TRACK BUFFER IN A PARALLEL DECODER” attorney docket number XSI.101/10X-402.  
         [0033]     It will be appreciated that in accordance with various exemplary embodiments, the present invention can be practiced as an exemplary procedure, such as procedure  800  as illustrated in  FIG. 8 . At start  801 , it can be determined whether a new code symbol, sequence or the like, has been received at  802 . For illustrative purposes, in determining whether a code symbol, sequence, or the like, has been received, it will suffice that new branch metric values, for example as described above, associated with possible received code states will be available at the output of an exemplary correlator/branch metric block such as the correlator/branch metric block  105  as described herein above in accordance with a clock rate, cycle rate, or the like for the decoder. At  803 , the branch metric values can be used as needed by the parallel ACS elements in accordance with, for example, the descriptions provided herein above such as the particular code generator used. Using the new branch metric values which, as will be appreciated and as is described herein above, represent the probabilities associated with the four possible received code symbol pairs, the present state information, the path metrics associated with the previous state, new path metrics can be calculated in each of 2 M-1  parallel connected ACS elements and a surviving path selected, for example, as described in connection with the operation of the ACS elements at  804 . Although at  805  the procedure is indicated as ending, it will be appreciated that a single “iteration” is shown for illustrative purposes. It is understood that the procedure in accordance with various exemplary embodiments, can continue to repeat, for example, as new branch metric values are received.  
         [0000]     Additional Modifications  
         [0034]     As noted above, the present disclosure illustrates and describes an exemplary parallel trellis decoder with 2 M-1  parallel ACS elements for use in a high-speed UWB environment. It will be appreciated that while various values for K and M have been described such as K=6 (M=5), and K=4 (M=3) for illustrative purposes for example, in  FIG. 7 , different values of K can be used without departing from the invention. It will also be appreciated that the particular implementation of the decoder will be specific to the underlying convolutional code used, for example, to encode symbol sequences and, for a particular value of K, there may be many possible generator polynomials which can be used in an encoder to yield slightly different codes. However, use of 2 M-1  parallel ACS units is consistent with the present invention and any of the slight differences noted above resulting in, for example, slightly different connections can be considered to are intended to fall within the scope of the present invention.  
       CONCLUSIONS  
       [0035]     The disclosed DS-UWB design provides scalable performance across a wide range of application requirements. This design leads to significant reductions in implementation complexity as compared to other proposed UWB PHY designs, while allowing increased scalability to high data-rate and low-power applications. This means that performance for applications such as high-rate data transfers for power-constrained handheld devices can significantly improved relative to current UWB PHY proposals. At the same time, the DS-UWB approach benefits from the significant benefits of true UWB operation, i.e., low fading in multipath, optimal interference characteristics, inherent frequency diversity and precision ranging capabilities.  
         [0036]     Although this disclosure discusses a UWB device using the IEEE 802.15.3a standard by way of example, the general design is also applicable to other wireless networks, and should not be considered to be limited to application with respect to IEEE 802.15.3a networks. It should further be noted that while the present invention is applicable to trellis decoding in a UWB device which operates at different speeds and in different modes, the present invention should not be limited to any particular type of decoding operation, but can be used in any decoding situation where a convolutionally encoded symbol is present and for which its features would be advantageous.  
         [0037]     This disclosure is intended to explain how to fashion and use various embodiments in accordance with the invention rather than to limit the true, intended, and fair scope and spirit thereof. The foregoing description is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Modifications or variations are possible in light of the above teachings. The embodiment(s) was chosen and described to provide the best illustration of the principles of the invention and its practical application, and to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. All such modifications and variations are within the scope of the invention as determined by the appended claims, as may be amended during the pendency of this application for patent, and all equivalents thereof, when interpreted in accordance with the breadth to which they are fairly, legally, and equitably entitled.

Technology Classification (CPC): 7