Patent Abstract:
A method which improves the correspondence between the produced fancy yarn and the predetermined configuration of said fancy yarn. The fancy yarn is guided through a sensor device in a spinning device after it is formed and the diameter of the fancy yarn is continuously measured by the sensor device. The fancy configuration of the produced yarn is determined on the basis of the measured values of the diameter and is compared with the predetermined fancy configuration. The comparison is carried out until sufficient correspondence between the predetermined fancy configuration and the fancy configuration of the optimized, produced yarn is achieved.

Full Description:
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
       [0001]    This application claims the benefit of German patent application 102004003032.4, filed Jan. 21, 2004, herein incorporated by reference. 
       BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
       [0002]    The invention relates to a method for the production of a fancy yarn, particularly such a method in which an effect configuration is predetermined and data is generated therefrom representing the selected effect configuration, and spinning adjustments are generated based on this data. 
         [0003]    A yarn is called a fancy yarn, in which thick locations are present with predetermined larger diameters and with predetermined lengths, the so-called effects. The yarn sections located in between with a smaller diameter, in other words, the effect-free sections, are called webs. The effect data determining a fancy yarn include, in particular, the effect length, the effect diameter, the effect frequency and the respective effect-free thread length or web length. 
         [0004]    Fancy yarns are becoming increasingly important. Areas of use are, for example, denim materials, materials for casual clothing and home textiles. 
         [0005]    Fancy yarns can also be produced on rotor spinning machines. In this case, for example, the fiber feed to the opening roller of the rotor spinning mechanism is changed, in that the rotational speed of the draw-in rollers is varied. For this purpose, mechanical gearings are activated, which drive continuous shafts along the machine. The draw-in rollers are made to rotate by means of these shafts. The large mass of the moved parts of a drive system of this type and the gearing play, however, makes it impossible, or only with difficulty, to achieve a precise and abrupt change of the yarn thickness at the beginning and end of an effect. The speed during the spinning of fancy yarn optionally has to be sharply reduced compared to the speed when spinning effect-free yarn. 
         [0006]    German Patent Publication DE 44 04 503 A1 describes a rotor spinning machine, in which each draw-in roller with its drive shaft is directly connected to an associated stepping motor. Each stepping motor can be activated by an activation unit. Random speed changes of the fiber band intake can be generated with a random generator. A fancy yarn with predetermined effects cannot be produced with this known rotor spinning machine. However, programs for controlling ring or rotor spinning machines, especially their delivery cylinders, have been developed, with which effects can be adjusted in a targeted manner. 
         [0007]    The spinning machine described in German Patent Publication DE 40 41 130 A1, is used for producing fancy yarn using a program control for the effect formation. Specifications such as rotational speed of the drive motors, speeds or specific machine parameters are provided and controlled. For example, for a specific flame or effect type of the fancy yarn to be produced, the rotational speed course of the electric motor is predetermined as a desired value curve. The actual rotational speed is monitored, for example, and recorded in a control device. By maintaining the predetermined rotational speed course, the configuration of the predetermined design of the fancy yarn should be ensured. Deviations from the desired configuration of the fancy yarn, such as may occur despite adhering to specific mentioned specification values, are not recognized in the spinning machine of German Patent Publication DE 40 41 130 A1. This can lead to a reduction in the quality of the fancy yarn or even to the production of reject yarn. 
         [0008]    The configuration of the fancy yarn during rotor spinning does not only depend on the control of the draw-in roller, but is also influenced, for example, by the low pressure in the spinning device or by the yarn rotation. It can therefore easily occur that the diverse influencing variables are inadequately coordinated and the configuration of the fancy yarn produced differs from the predetermined configuration of the fancy yarn to an undesired extent. A change in the spinning adjustments on the basis of a visual qualifying checking of the yarn often leads to costly and very time-consuming coordination processes. 
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
       [0009]    The object of the invention is to propose a method which improves the correspondence of the fancy yarn produced with the predetermined configuration of the fancy yarn. 
         [0010]    This object is achieved by an improved method for the production of a fancy yarn, in which an effect configuration is predetermined and data is generated therefrom to represent the selected effect configuration, and in which spinning adjustments are generated based on this data. The present invention is characterized in that once the fancy yarn has been formed in a spinning device, the yarn is guided through a sensor mechanism, and at least one of the parameters, diameter and mass of the fancy yarn is continuously measured by means of the sensor mechanism, the measured values are evaluated, the effect configuration of the yarn produced is determined therefrom and is compared with the predetermined effect configuration, and the spinning adjustments are changed until an adequate correspondence is achieved between the predetermined effect configuration and the effect configuration of the yarn produced. 
         [0011]    Advantageous further configurations of the invention are described hereinafter. 
         [0012]    Owing to the method according to the invention, a monitoring of the configuration of the fancy yarn is carried out, which allows comparison on the basis of quantified properties of the fancy yarn. Comparison can take place until adequate correspondence with the predetermined configuration of the fancy yarn has been achieved. In other words, it is possible, according to the present invention, to check the result of the respective change of parameters, in a plurality of cycles, and to again introduce a change. In this manner, a yarn can be generated, which substantially corresponds to the predetermined configuration of the fancy yarn. 
         [0013]    The correspondence can be checked, in each case, either by statistical recording, in particular recording the effects in tables, in other words, their thickness, length and distribution or else displaying them on a screen. The display on a screen can be carried out, for example, by means of the Oasys® system from Zweigle. A specification in tables in the form of a so-called effect table describes the pattern repeat of the fancy yarn and is described by way of example. Lines with information about the sections configured as a web and with information about the sections of the fancy yarn configured as an effect alternate with one another in the effect table, in each case, one after the other. The first line of the effect table contains information about a web length and the web thickness. The second line contains information about an effect length and an effect thickness. There then follows a line with a web length and web thickness etc. After listing all the predetermined effects and webs in the predetermined sequence, a so-called yarn repeat of the fancy yarn is present. The summation of all web and effect lengths of the effect table produces the repeat length. In producing the fancy yarn, in accordance with the specification of the first line of the above-described effect table, a web is firstly configured, for example, then an effect according to the specification of the second line of the effect table, followed by a web according to the specification of the third line etc., up to the last line of the effect table. After the last line of the effect table, the cycle starts again with the first line of the effect table. In order to avoid a so-called “image”, after multiple repetition of the yarn repeat with an unchanged first line, a yarn repeat with a changed first line can be inserted. The change may be carried out, for example, in the web length or the effect length. As the next yarn repeat after such a so-called “disturbance”, a yarn repeat with an unchanged original first line is then selected again. The cycle is repeated with sporadically inserted “disturbances” until the predetermined yarn length is wound on the bobbin. The effect configuration, which is determined with the aid of evaluation of the measured diameter values, is compared with the effect configuration which is predetermined by the effect table. The thicknesses and lengths of the effects and webs listed in the effect table in this case form DESIRED values, the correspondence of which with the measured ACTUAL values is checked. 
         [0014]    The continuous measurement of a transverse dimension such as the diameter of the fancy yarn allows an assessment on the basis of quantified properties, as a result of which the comparison can take place in a more targeted and rapid manner compared to a merely qualifying visual assessment. For adaptation to the predetermined configuration of the fancy yarn, changes in the previous data are made. The changing of specific spinning parameters has specific effects on the yarn cross-section. Some parameters can be automatically changed. This is possible, in particular, in the control of the fiber feed to the opening roller by means of control of the draw-in roller. When the draw-in roller temporarily runs more rapidly compared to the rotational speed, which is adjusted to produce a web section, more fiber material is fed per time unit to form the thread. This produces a thicker thread section or an effect. The effect thickness is, in this case, at least approximately proportional to the rotational speed of the draw-in roller. If it is established, for example, that the measured effect thickness is too low, compared with the predetermined effect thickness in the yarn repeat, the rotational speed of the draw-in roller is correspondingly increased. On the other hand, if the measured effect thickness is too great, the rotational speed of the draw-in roller is reduced accordingly. If the evaluation of the measured diameter values of the thread ascertains, for example, that the effect begins too late or the previous web is too long and the length of the effect is therefore not adequate, the beginning of the phase, in which the draw-in roller rotates more rapidly and therefore conveys more fiber material to the opening roller, can be accordingly moved to an earlier point in time. The effect is therefore lengthened. If the effect ends too late and is therefore too long, the end of the phase, in which the draw-in roller rotates more rapidly and therefore conveys more fiber material to the opening roller, can be moved accordingly to an earlier point in time. In the case of deviations of the position, the diameter and the length of the webs, the procedure described above in the case of effects is used. 
         [0015]    Further possibilities for changing spinning parameters are known to the person skilled in the art and these affect the yarn cross-section. Thus, by changing the rotor speed, the rotation of the thread and in association with this, the thickness of the thread, can be influenced. In the case of a higher rotation, the thread is more constricted. The adjustment of the low pressure in the spinning device also influences the effect configuration and can be used as a control variable for the effect configuration. Further possibilities for influencing are offered by the choice of the rotational speed of the opening roller and its configuration, in particular its clothing, or the selection of further spinning means, such as, for example, of the spinning rotor. The combing out performance of the opening roller, influencing the effect, is determined both by the type of clothing and by the peripheral speed of the opening roller. Fluctuations or changes in the fiber feed can be implemented more rapidly with an increased rotational speed of the opening roller or more aggressive clothing, which release more fibers from the fiber sample fed through the draw-in roller. At least the direction, in which a change of the spinning parameters has an effect, is known in each case, so in the event of a deviation from the predetermined configuration of the fancy yarn, a reduction can be made in the deviation. The effects of the change are checked by a renewed comparison, with regard to whether it has led to a reduction in the deviation and whether, and optionally in what direction, further changes are to be made in a next step. 
         [0016]    According to claims  2  and  3 , spinning adjustments are to be taken into account which relate to the basic adjustment of the machine, which do not fluctuate, like the directly effect-related data with the changing transverse dimension of the yarn. Thus, for example, a change in the rotation coefficient can change the thickness of the yarn section. The combing out performance of the opening roller influencing the effect is determined both by the type of clothing and also by the peripheral speed of the opening roller. If such spinning adjustments are included in the comparison process, the possibilities are improved of rapidly reaching optimally selected or adjusted spinning parameters. 
         [0017]    By storing the spinning adjustments after comparison, renewed production of the optimized yarn is possible again at any time, the reproducibility being very good. 
         [0018]    The data to be fed again to the rotor spinning machine is effective for various control mechanisms. The data accordingly contains addresses of control mechanisms, for which it is intended. This leads to the intended allocation of the data when downloading. This also includes data which is only displayed on a display of the central control mechanism. This relates, in particular to data which cannot be implemented by the machine itself. The selection of the spinning means is mentioned by way of example. 
         [0019]    According to further features of the invention, a method for evaluating the measured yarn values is carried out to determine the effects, with the aid of which it is possible to characterize the configuration of the effects produced and to compare these effects with those which are specified, for example, in table form, in an effect table. 
         [0020]    The change to achieve adequate correspondence between the predetermined effect configuration and the effect configuration of the yarn produced advantageously takes place as a control process, which is assisted by the use of control algorithms and empirically determined spinning adjustments, in table form. Both control algorithms and empirically determined spinning adjustments in table form are used to shorten the control process by targeted changes. 
         [0021]    In the method according to the invention, the monitoring of the threads produced is selected as the object. By comparing the effect configuration of the fancy yarn produced with the desired effect configuration predetermined for the yarn, the degree of correspondence or deviation is ascertained. For the further yarn production, ascertained deviations from the desired effect configuration are minimized adequately or completely eliminated by means of the control process. The control process is based on the ACTUAL effect configuration in this case. On the other hand, as in known methods, if only the adherence to the specifications for the feeding of fiber material is monitored, this entails disadvantages. If the fiber material feed, which is supplied for the fancy yarn formation in the form of fiber bands or roving, is controlled without consideration of the ACTUAL effect configuration, other disturbance variables and their effect on the effect formation of the fancy yarn produced are not recognized. 
         [0022]    This defect is avoided in the method according to the invention. The control process is based, in this case, on the ACTUAL effect configuration. Thus every deviation occurring owing to the influence of disturbance variables, of the ACTUAL effect configuration from the desired effect configuration becomes recognizable. An effective control process can be carried out in this manner. When changing the draw-in speed during the feeding of the fiber material or the draw-off speed of the fancy yarn produced, these two speeds are matched to each other in such a way that the effect image corresponds to the desired effect configuration, as a result. 
         [0023]    The method according to the invention will be described with the aid of a rotor spinning machine. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         [0024]    In the drawings: 
           [0025]      FIG. 1  shows a basic view of a spinning station, 
           [0026]      FIG. 2  shows the opening mechanism of a spinning station in a simplified basic view, in a partial view, 
           [0027]      FIG. 3  shows a basic view of the control, in particular of draw-in rollers of a rotor spinning machine, 
           [0028]      FIG. 4  shows a fancy yarn, which is shown by the placing side by side of measured values of the yarn diameter and 
           [0029]      FIG. 5  is a basic view of a fancy yarn. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
       [0030]    Of the large number of spinning stations of a rotor spinning machine, a single spinning station  1  is shown in side view. At the spinning station  1 , a fiber band  3  is drawn in from a fiber band can  2  through a so-called condenser  4  into the spinning box  5  of the rotor spinning mechanism. The mechanism arranged in the spinning box  5  for isolating the fibers and feeding them into the spinning rotor  6  are known from the prior art and therefore not described in more detail. The drive of the spinning rotor  6  is indicated and consists of a belt  7  running along the machine, with which all the rotors of the spinning stations installed on one longitudinal side of the spinning machine are driven. Nevertheless, single drives of the rotors are alternatively also possible. The belt  7  rests on the rotor shaft  8  of the spinning rotor  6 . 
         [0031]    The thread  9 , which is drawn off by means of the draw-off rollers  11  through the thread draw-off tube  10  is formed in the spinning rotor  6 . The thread  9  then passes a sensor  12 , which is part of a so-called clearer  13  for monitoring the quality of the thread  9 . To recognize a yarn defect, the measured diameters are detected in relation to the thread length passing through. On recognizing a yarn defect, the rotation of the draw-in roller  27  shown in  FIG. 2  is stopped, for example, and a thread interruption is thus caused. The thread  9  is guided by a thread guide  14  in such a way that it is wound in cross-wound layers onto a cross-wound bobbin  15 . The cross-wound bobbin  15  is carried by a bobbin holder  16 , which is pivotably mounted on the machine frame. The cross-wound bobbin  15  rests with its periphery on the winding drum  17  and is driven thereby such that the thread  9  is wound in cross-wound layers in cooperation with the thread guide  14 . The rotational directions of the cross-wound bobbin  15  and the winding drum  17  are indicated by arrows. The sensor  12  is connected to a local control unit  20  of the spinning station via the line  18 . The control unit  20  is connected to a central computer  22  of the rotor spinning machine via the line  21 . The stepping motor  23  of the draw-in roller is connected to the control mechanism  25  via the line  24 . 
         [0032]      FIG. 2  shows details of the opening of the fiber band  3  into individual fibers. The fiber band  3  drawn in through the condenser  4  is clamped between the clamping table  26  and the draw-in roller  27  and presented to the rapidly rotating opening roller  28 . The draw-in roller  27  is connected to the stepping motor  23  via the drive connection  29 . The stepping motor  23  can be activated via the line  24 . The direction of rotation of the opening roller  28  is indicated by the arrow  30 . 
         [0033]    The basic structure of a draw-in roller control is shown schematically in  FIG. 3 . 
         [0034]    In the present example, the diameter of the presented yarn is measured. As an alternative, for example, the yarn mass could be determined by means of a capacitive sensor instead of an optical one. During determination of the yarn mass, which is generally taken as a basis for the determination of the yarn fineness, the mass of a yarn section passing the measuring region is measured, while during the optical measurement, an average diameter value is determined inside the measuring region. The two measurements are equally suitable for evaluating the effect configuration. In the present example, the invention is described by means of determining the diameter, however. 
         [0035]    Firstly, the configuration of the fancy yarn is input or read into a schematically shown input mechanism  31  and this data is transmitted to a yarn design unit  32 . The transmission is indicated by the arrow  33 . The data required for spinning on a rotor spinning machine are generated in the yarn design unit  32  by means of yarn design software. This data includes both the directly effect-related data, which fluctuates with the changing diameter of the yarn and further data relating to the basic adjustment of the rotor spinning machine. This involves, for example, the rotor, draw-off roller and opening roller speed and the selection of the spinning means. While the latter are preferably retrieved from a table, the rotational speeds are to be determined by corresponding algorithms. These algorithms are based on known interconnections. This involves, for example, the determination of the drawing from the ratio of the rotational speeds of the draw-off rollers to the rotational speed of the draw-in rollers, or of the rotations per meter from the rotor speed in relation to the draw-off speed and the constriction of the fiber assembly connected thereto. 
         [0036]    The data generated in the yarn design unit  32  is transmitted to a central control mechanism  35  of the rotor spinning machine via a bus system  34 . Transmission may also take place alternatively with transportable data carriers, such as, for example, a compact flash card. 
         [0037]    The central control mechanism  35  is connected to the central computer  22  via the data line  36 . 
         [0038]    The control mechanism  25  comprises the control of 24 stepping motors  23 , for example, of the respective draw-in rollers  27  via lines  24 . All 24 winding stations are constructed in the same manner. A control card  40  is connected onto the control mechanism  25  by means of a connection device  39 . The data required to produce fancy yarn is transmitted, for the control of the stepping motors  23 , via a bus system  41  from the central control mechanism  35  to the control card  40 . To produce fancy yarn, the control card  40  converts the data about the thickness and length of the effects and the webs, with adaptation to the other spinning adjustments, into control data for the stepping motors  23  to generate the rotational movement of the draw-in rollers  27 . Via the bus system  42  as a continuation of the bus system  41 , the data required to control the stepping motors of the draw-in rollers is transmitted to further control cards, not shown, which are connected to control mechanisms of further sections of the rotor spinning machine. One of the further control mechanisms is indicated by dashed lines. The further control mechanisms are constructed like the control mechanism  25 , have an identical connection device and a connected, identical control card. Each further control mechanism in each case controls the spinning stations of a section of the rotor spinning machine formed from 24 spinning stations. 
         [0039]    If the stepping motor  23  is activated in such a way that it runs more rapidly, the draw-in roller  27  transports more fiber material to the opening roller  28 . This results in the fact that more fiber material arrives, per time unit, in the rotor  6  and the spun thread becomes thicker. The length of the thick location depends on the duration of the increased fiber feed. The diameter of the thick location depends on the speed of the stepping motor  23  or the draw-in roller  27 . 
         [0040]    The control mechanism  25  is also activated by the central computer  22  via the line  43 , with it being specified via control commands whether the control mechanism  25  controls the production of a fancy yarn or the production of effect-free yarn. 
         [0041]    The freshly spun yarn is measured out by the sensor  12  and the measured values are transmitted to the yarn design unit  32 , which is also provided with a display, not shown, in order to reproduce the current fancy yarn or to quantify deviations from the specification. If the appearance or the statistical description of the freshly spun yarn does not correspond to the predetermined configuration of the fancy yarn, further changes have to be made. These changes may consist both in changing the effect parameters, which are input in the yarn design unit and also in changing machine parameters, which are to be input as a rule at the central computer  22 . For this purpose, control connections  44  are available at the central computer, which, for example, can lead to a control mechanism  45  for the draw-off rollers  11  or a control mechanism  46  for the spinning rotors  6 , the control mechanisms  45  and  46  being formed, for example, by a frequency converter. A display  47  at the central computer also shows the selected spinning means, which, as already mentioned, have a not inconsiderable influence on the configuration of the effects. 
         [0042]      FIG. 4  shows a view of the fancy yarn as a placing side by side of measured values. The effects  48  and webs  49  can be recognized, but the beginning and end of the effects  48  and the effect thickness or the effect diameter D E  and the web thickness or the web diameter D ST  cannot be seen clearly and therefore not adequately. 
         [0043]    The sensor  12  continuously measures the yarn diameter D and transmits the measured data for evaluation via the central computer  22  to the yarn design unit  32 . The yarn diameter D is recorded in each case after 2 mm of yarn length. A cycle represents a measuring length of 2 mm of yarn. In the view of  FIG. 5 , the limit diameter D is shown as a percentage over the yarn length Ls as a curve  10 . The curve  50  represents the web diameter D ST  in the view of  FIG. 5 , beginning from the left up to the point  51 . From the point  51 , the curve  50  rises and passes the value of the limit diameter D GR  at the point  52 . At point  53 , the predetermined yarn length L V1  has been passed through since reaching the point  52 . Since an increase in diameter of 15% is recorded at point  52  and the exceeding of the limit diameter D GR  lasts over the predetermined length L V1 , for example, six cycles or 12 mm, the point  52  is defined as the beginning of the effect. The curve  50  falls below the limit diameter D GR  at point  54 . The falling below lasts to the point  55  and therefore over the predetermined length L V2 . Therefore, the point  54  is defined as the end of the effect. The effect length L E  is determined from the beginning and end of the effect between point  52  and point  54 . An arithmetic average value is formed from the four largest diameters  56  inside the effect. Thus the information about the effect diameter is very largely independent of natural diameter fluctuations in the effect region. This arithmetic average value is defined as the effect diameter D E . 
         [0044]    The yarn clearer  37  continuously determines whether the diameter values of the thread  9  detected by the sensor  12  derive from a region which is defined as a web  49  or as an effect  48 . The fluctuation width Bs designates the spacing between the diameter of the effect  48  and the diameter of the web  49 . If the diameter values of the thread  9  derive from a region, which is defined as a web  49 , these diameter values are compared with the limit values, the limit value RG STO  and the limit value RG STU , associated with the web diameter D ST . If the diameter values of the thread  9  derive from a region, which is defined as an effect  48 , these diameter values are compared with the limit values, the limit value RG EO  and the limit value RG EO , associated with the effect diameter D E . 
         [0045]    The limit values are selected in such a way that exceeding them signifies an intolerable deviation. An intolerable deviation triggers a change in the spinning parameters. If, for example, an effect does not have the correct dimension, because the thickness of this effect is too low, the thread feed for the phase, in which this effect is formed, is raised by means of an increase in the rotational speed of the draw-in roller and the deviation from the predetermined effect thickness is reduced or eliminated in this manner. 
         [0046]    The yarn clearer  37  can be set up in such a way that, alternatively, either only deviations in the web regions or only deviations in the effect regions are taken into account. 
         [0047]    According to the checking of the diameters of the thread  9 , the web length and the effect length can also be compared with predetermined lengths, without there being an exceeding of diameter limit values, and with the aid of length limit values, a decision can be made as to whether intolerable deviations are present.

Technology Classification (CPC): 3