Patent Abstract:
A method for controlling transfer of files in a network of inserters at a plurality of sites from a remote command center. The method retrieving inserter data stored at the plurality of inserter sites and storing the data at the command center. The command center further uploading software updates to the plurality of inserters in accordance with a predefined upload/download scheme. The upload/download scheme defined at the command center via a graphical interface. The upload/download scheme identifying one or more of the plurality of inserters for the file transfer transaction, identifying inserter data from the selected one or more inserters to upload to the command center, identifying software updates to download from the command center to the one or more selected inserters, identifying a time for the file transfer transaction, identifying a sequence for the upload and download portions of the transfer transaction; and executing the defined file transfer transaction.

Full Description:
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C.§119( e ) from U.S. Provisional Application 60/348,237 dated Oct. 23, 2001, titled REMOTE MONITORING AND SOFTWARE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR SERVICING INSERTER SYSTEMS, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. 

   TECHNICAL FIELD 
   The present invention relates to a system for upgrading and updating software for use on a network of mutually monitored and controlled inserter systems. 
   BACKGROUND 
   Systems for mass producing mail pieces are well known in the art. Such systems are typically used by organizations such as banks, insurance companies and utility companies for producing a large volume of specific mailings like billing statements, or promotional offers. The starting point for the document production process is a stream of print data generated by the organization wishing to create the mailing. The print streams are usually produced by older, legacy, computer systems that are not easily adapted to do more than provide raw print data that is output as a result of the legacy computer systems&#39; business logic. 
   The raw print stream data may be manipulated using known print stream manipulation software, such as the Streamweaver™ product of Pitney Bowes Inc. Print stream manipulation software allows users to change the look and content of documents, without requiring changes to the legacy computer systems. 
   Once print stream manipulation is complete, the print stream may be sent to a high volume printer. Such high volume printing results in large rolls or stacks of documents, usually connected in a continuous web. The webs of documents are transported to an inserter machine to be separated into individual pages and turned into mail pieces. Examples of such inserter systems are the 8 series and 9 series inserter systems available from Pitney Bowes Inc. of Stamford Conn. 
   In many respects the typical inserter system resembles a manufacturing assembly line. Sheets and other raw materials (other sheets, enclosures, and envelopes) enter the inserter system as inputs. A plurality of different modules or workstations in the inserter system work cooperatively to process the sheets until a finished mail piece is produced. The exact configuration of each inserter system depends upon the needs of each particular customer or installation. 
   Typically, inserter systems prepare mail pieces by gathering collations of documents on a conveyor. The collations are then transported on the conveyor to an insertion station where they are automatically stuffed into envelopes. After being stuffed with the collations, the envelopes are removed from the insertion station for further processing. Such further processing may include automated closing and sealing the envelope flap, weighing the envelope, applying postage to the envelope, and finally sorting and stacking the envelopes. 
   Each collation of documents processed by the inserter system typically includes a control document having coded control marks printed thereon. Scanners are located throughout the inserter system to sense the presence of the control document and to allow control for processing of a particular mail piece. The coded marks may be bar codes, UPC code, or the like. 
   The inserter system control system is coupled to each of the inserter system&#39;s modular components. The control system stores data files identifying how individual mail pieces should be processed. These data files are typically linked to individual mail pieces by the coded marks included on the control documents. As a collation passes through the inserter system, the coded marks on the control document are scanned and the control system directs the modular components to assemble the mail piece as appropriate. Mail pieces such as billing statements will often include a reply document and/or a return envelope that is pre-addressed for delivery back to the originator of the mail piece. Such reply documents and return envelopes may be used to send back payments, or acceptances of offers, or the like. 
   Once a finished mail piece has been formed by the inserter system, it may be stacked and provided to a carrier service, such as the U.S. Postal Service, for delivery. Often, in order to receive postal discounts, it is advantageous to sort the outgoing mail in accordance postal regulations. Such output sorting devices are well known. Examples of output sorting devices are available from MailCode, Inc. 
   The inserter control system also collects data about the efficiency and functioning of the inserter system. For example, the control system can monitor and keep statistics about the speed at which the system is operating, and the rate of errors that occur. Such monitoring may utilize data from tracking mail piece control documents through the inserter system. Additional sensors may also be used to provide further information. For example, optical sensors and scanners may be located at input and output locations for the inserter systems to further monitor and record data concerning inserter processing. 
   Recently, systems have been developed to monitor and control multiple inserter systems, such as those described above, from remote locations on a network. As such, operation of multiple geographically separate inserter systems can be observed from a centralized control center. Thus, a bank with mail production facilities in Newark and Atlanta can monitor bank statement production activities from its headquarters office in New York City. 
   SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
   The present invention provides enhancement to such existing systems by providing the ability to receive data files from remote inserter systems, and to transfer files to remote inserter systems, from a central repository. This transfer of files is preferably to upload software updates to the remote inserter machines and to download inserter and mail production data from the remote inserter machines. Control of the transfer of files to and from the central repository can be accomplished through a control website that may be accessed anywhere with Internet access. Such transfers can be scheduled for immediate execution of for any time in the future. The present invention will also notify the originator when such downloads/uploads are complete. 
   The present invention provides benefits, including archiving of files from remote inserter systems without physically traveling to them; upgrading of software on remote inserter systems without having to physically visit them; scheduling transfer of files anytime without having to physically visit them; transferring files to and from multiple inserter systems at one or more locations simultaneously; supporting multiple protocols for different kinds of machines; and automatic notification to the user when tasks are completed. 

   
     SUMMARY OF THE FIGURES 
       FIG. 1  depicts an exemplary embodiment of an inserter control network for use with the present invention. 
       FIG. 2  depicts an exemplary form for use with the present invention in carrying out the desired upload and download functionality. 
   

   DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
   In  FIG. 1 , a system for implementing remote monitoring and software distribution system is depicted. Remote monitoring and software distribution functionality are preferably handled from a command center  100 , which may or may not be geographically proximal to the site where documents are being created and formed into mail pieces. Preferably the command center  100  will be capable of monitoring document production sites, e.g.  130  and  140 , at a plurality of remote and local locations. Terminal  101  within the command center  100  allow users to interface with the remote monitoring and software distribution system through a command intranet  103 . Alternately, a remote terminal  102  may communicate to the command infrastructure  110  through a network  104 , such as the Internet. 
   The command infrastructure  110  is preferably comprised of a command web server  113  to handle communications and data transfer with remote and local network locations. A monitoring application server  114  includes the computer hardware and software for transferring data too and from the command infrastructure  110 , and for providing a control and monitoring interface for users. Monitoring data downloaded from the inserter sites  130  and  140  data are stored at the command location in the command database  111 . Database  111  may also include the necessary software update information to be provided to the remote inserter sites  130  and  140 . 
   The monitoring application server  114  includes a transfer files job handler  115  for coordinating the uploading and downloading the monitoring data and software updates respectively. A notification handler  116  provides for notification messages to the sent to users to notify them when predetermined events relating to the uploading and downloading of information have occurred. 
   A remote inserter site  130  (linked via the Internet  104 ) is preferably comprised of a site infrastructure  120  and to one or more inserter machines  145 . The site infrastructure  120  and local inserters  145  are linked via a site intranet  126 . The site infrastructure  120  includes a web server  124  for communicating with the remote command infrastructure  110 . Site infrastructure  120  further includes a data concentrator  125  that prepares the respective upload and download data for transfer. Within, or associated with, the one or more inserters  145 , an inserter web server  151  provides communications capabilities to and from the inserter. Finally inserter applications  150  control the ongoing operation of the inserters  145  in the formation of mail pieces. It is inserter applications  150  that must be periodically updated to provide the latest versions of control software, so that the inserter machine may be run to provide optimal mail piece creation functionality. 
   The present invention provides file transfer between the command infrastructure  110  and the one or more inserter sites  130 ,  140 . File upload from the command infrastructure  110  is necessary for updating applications  150  in the inserter  145 . Such applications may be .exe files, .dll files, or .mdb files. 
   File downloads from the inserter sites  130 ,  140  are needed to allow retrieval of files including but not limited to log files, configuration files and mail piece logs generated at the inserters  145 . 
   An authorized user logged onto command center terminal  101  or remote terminal  102  can initiate and control the transfer of files to and from one or more inserter sites  130 ,  140 . In the preferred embodiment all file transfers are implemented using standard ftp client/server communications. All file transfers are initiated from the command infrastructure  110 , although the user/controller may be logged into the system from a remote location  102 . 
   The user initiates a file transfer by filling out and submitting a form  200 , as depicted in  FIG. 2 . The information in form  200  is verified and used to create a transfer request. When the transfer request is accepted, the transfer is scheduled for the requested time. Upon the requested time, the files are transferred and the user is notified. A transfer job is created from information gathered from form  200 . A unique job ID is assigned to uniquely identify the job 
   A download request portion of a job is created pursuant to the download portion  220  of the transfer form  200 . A download request is preferably an XML file and contains a list of inserter machines  145  at the various remote locations and files, as well as a time to perform the transfer. The files are downloaded via FTP to the data concentrators  125  serving the remote inserters  145 . A scheduler thread is created for each inserter  145  in the download request. The file information is saved and the thread information sleeps until the given download time. 
   At the given download time the thread wakes up and increments the data concentrator  125  “FTP Request Flag” for a corresponding inserter  145 . When an “FTP Accepted” message is received the files are transferred from the inserter  145 . If execution of a file before downloading has been selected by the user, the thread may further send an “Execute File” command to the inserter  145 . After all is complete, completion status is reported back to the command infrastructure via an XML file. 
   Similarly if a user wants the transfer job to include uploading activity, an upload request is created for each data concentrator  125  associated with the job. The upload request is an XML file and contains a list of inserters  145  and files and a time to perform the transfer. The upload request is transferred to the appropriate data concentrators  125 . The file information is saved and the thread sleeps until the designated upload time. 
   At the designated upload time the thread wakes up and increments the “FTP Request Flag” for the inserter  145 . The inserter  145  accepts the FTP request and the thread then sends an “Execute File” command. The inserter  145  runs the file and returns and “Execute Done” message. The upload files are transferred to the inserter  145  until all identified upload files are transferred. Completion status is reported back to the command infrastructure  110  via an XML file. 
   As discussed above,  FIG. 2  depicts an exemplary operator interface  200  to be used in conjunction with a web browser. The upload files section  210  includes designations and options for users to define the aspects of jobs relating to uploads. The “machines” field  211  includes a list of customers, sites and inserters that can be designated for upload transfers. A user will select one or more inserters from the “machines” field  211 . The “upload” list box  212  contains a list of pre-configured upload jobs. The selections are retrieved from the command database  111 . Each selection in the “upload” list box includes a corresponding list of file and directory pairs to upload. One or more upload jobs can be selected in upload field  212 . The “additional files” field  213  allows the user to enter additional files that are not included in pre-configured jobs in field  212 . Entries in field  213  must include the full path and file specifications, but may contain wildcard characters. The “upload to directory” field  314  specifies the directory on the inserter  145  where the uploaded files are to be copied. The “execute before upload” field  215  specifies a file (executable, batch file, etc.) that is executed on the inserter  145  before the files are uploaded. 
   The download files section  220  includes designations and options for users to define the aspects of jobs relating to downloads. The “machines” field  221  includes a list of customers, sites and inserters that can be designated for download transfers. A user will select one or more inserters from the “machines” field  221 . The “download” list box  222  contains a list of pre-configured download jobs. The selections are retrieved from the command database  111 . Each selection in the “download” list box  222  includes a corresponding list of files to down load and the destination directory for each file. One or more upload jobs can be selected in “download” field  222 . The “download from directory” field  223  includes the identification of the directory, or directories, from which files should be downloaded. The “other download files” field  224  allows the user to enter additional files to download. Entries in field  224  must include the full path and filed specifications, but may contain wildcard characters. The “execute after download” field  225  specifies a file (executable, batch file, etc.) that is executed on the inserter  145  after the files are downloaded. 
   The setup section  230  includes designations and options for users to define how the upload and download jobs should be performed. The “notification” list box  231  contains a list of notification methods that may be retrieved from database  111 . Notification methods include email, fax, pager, or a screen message that will alert the user that an upload or download event has occurred pursuant to the defined job. The “time to transfer” field  232  is where the date and time for performing the defined transfer is designated. An “interval for retry” field  233  is used to indicate how often frequently a transfer attempt should be retried if an inserter  145  is busy and cannot accept a transfer at a designated time. The “number of retries” field  234  indicates how many retries should be attempted. 
   The “coordinate transfers” selection box  235  includes several options for coordinating upload and download activity. “None” is used when there is a transfer only in one direction or if no coordination is required (uploads and downloads will occur simultaneously). The “Job Upload Before Download” option forces all uploads on all machines to finish before any download starts. The “Job Download Before Upload” option forces all downloads on all machines to finish before any upload starts. The “Machine Upload Before Download” option forces all uploads on a machine to finish before the download for that machine starts. The “Machine Download Before Upload” option forces all downloads on a machine to finish before the upload for that machine starts. 
   Upon completion of the form  200 , the submit button  240  may be pressed and a corresponding transfer job will be created and stored. 
   Events occurring during a transfer job are asynchronous. Since multiple sites  130 ,  140  and multiple inserters  145  may be included in the transfer the error handling is done on an inserter by inserter basis. A status condition of each transfer job on each inserter is maintained in the database  111 . Each error condition is handled on an individual basis. An error only affects the entire job as it affects the completion of a task to be performed before a subsequent task is started (i.e. if the “complete download before upload” condition is set and there is an error on the download then the upload cannot proceed.). 
   If the command infrastructure  110  is unable to transfer a file to or from a data concentrator  125 , a thread is created to sleep and retry. The retry time and count from the form  200  are used. If the command infrastructure  110  tries the maximum amount of times without success, a failure status is stored in the database  111  for each inserter  145  involved on that data concentrator  125 . The user may be notified via the notification handler  216  in accordance with the method selected from field  231  on form  200 . 
   Similarly, if a data concentrator  125  is unable to transfer a file to or from an inserter  145 , a thread is created to sleep and retry. The retry time and count from the form  200  are used. If the data concentrator  125  tries the maximum amount of times without success, a failure status is stored in the database  111  for each inserter  145  involved on that data concentrator  125 . The user may be notified via the notification handler  116  in accordance with the method selected from field  231  on form  200 . 
   Thus, although the invention has been described with respect to a preferred embodiment thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing and various other changes, omissions and deviations in the form and detail thereof may be made without departing from the scope of this invention, as further described in the following claims.

Technology Classification (CPC): 6