Patent Abstract:
A user terminal ( 10 ) using an internet protocol using session initiation protocol to interconnect a number of user terminals ( 11 - 13 ) in a conference call. A conference bridge ( 30 ) or user terminal ( 10 ) detects speech of one of the user terminals ( 203 ). A “babble ” timer is started ( 207 ). The speaker is allowed to continuously speak until silence is detected ( 217 ) or until the “babble” timer timers out ( 211 ).

Full Description:
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS  
       [0001]    The present application is related to copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. IRI05428 being assigned to the same assignee as the present invention. 
     
    
     
       BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
         [0002]    The present invention pertains to teleconferencing arrangements and more particularly to conference call bridges in a voice over internet protocol environment.  
           [0003]    Special telephony functions are provided by telephone operating companies or by teleconference facilitator companies. These companies provide the special service of teleconference facilitating by interconnecting three or more conference users in one common telephone call. As a result, each of the users is able to talk and to hear each of the other users. The number of total teleconference users may be quite high. In the internet protocol environment, bandwidths are typically very large compared to basic voice telephony. Voice data becomes almost incidental to the large packets of data carried on the internet. Therefore, voice over internet protocol (VOIP) enables the internet system to carry telephone traffic which typically requires far less data to be exchanged via the internet than does data packages of information.  
           [0004]    Telephone operating companies or teleconference facilitator companies typically implement a teleconference arrangement by a conference bridge. This conference bridge includes a bank of varied codecs, converters, mixers and vocoders. Each particular user has a codec in his teleconference terminal and must be connected with a similar codec at the conference bridge arrangement in the teleconference facilitator&#39;s equipment. The conference users may have different and varied codecs, therefore the conference bridge must be capable of serving many different kinds of codec interfaces.  
           [0005]    In typical conference calling arrangements, “long winded” speakers may monopolize the conference call. In other situations one of the conference callers may be speaking from a noisy environment. In such situations that speaker will monopolize the conference since the conference bridge will perceive that speaker as never going silent (stop talking) due to the high level of noise.  
           [0006]    Also, quick detection of silence avoids the real time problems and computing power required to detect silence in conventional conference arrangements.  
           [0007]    What is needed is a token passing arrangement for avoiding a monopolizing speaker or a noisy environment in a conference call bridge in a voice over internet protocol environment. 
       
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING  
       [0008]    [0008]FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a conference call bridge arrangement using voice over internet protocol in accordance with the present invention.  
         [0009]    [0009]FIGS. 2 and 3 are a flow chart of a call origination and set up in accordance with the present invention.  
         [0010]    [0010]FIG. 4 is a flow chart of the token passing arrangement in accordance with the present invention.  
         [0011]    [0011]FIG. 5 is a block diagram of the conference bridge in accordance with the present invention. 
     
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT  
       [0012]    In providing the present invention, session internet protocol (SIP) is used. SIP provides terminal capability negotiations and invitation to multicast conferences. Further, SIP provides the necessary protocol mechanisms so that the user terminals and any proxy servers can provide the following services: user location, user capabilities, terminal capability negotiation, and invitations to multicast conference.  
         [0013]    [0013]FIG. 1 depicts a block diagram of a conference bridge arrangement according to the present invention. User terminals  10 ,  11 ,  12  and  13  are shown with data transfer interconnections  20 ,  21 ,  22  and  23  respectively connecting user terminals  10 - 13  to the controller  32  of conference bridge  30 . Conference bridge  30  may be a voice packet switched bridge. These data transfer interconnections  20 - 23  are termed bearer traffic (voice data) interconnections. Similarly, each of the user terminals  10 - 13  are interconnected to the conference bridge  30  via signaling or control interconnections  44 ,  54 ,  64  and  74  respectively.  
         [0014]    In conventional bridge arrangements, all signaling would be controlled by the conference bridge  30  via the signaling leads  44 ,  54 ,  64  and  74 . As can be seen from FIG. 1, each of the user terminals (teleconference terminals)  10 - 13  has a different set of codecs  80 - 83  associated with the user terminal. The conventional conference bridge would be required to convert the data flow from each of the codecs  80 - 83 ; mix the information and separately vocode four different codecs before retransmitting the information for the conference call back to each of the user terminals  10 - 13 . Such arrangement requires great processing power within the conference bridge. In an implementation of such a conference bridge, multiple signal processors (DSP) would be required at conference bridge  30  to perform these various functions.  
         [0015]    In the present invention, each use of terminal is also interconnected via a session initiation protocol (SIP) connection to each of the other user terminals in the conference. That is, for example, user terminal  10  is interconnected to user terminal  11  via interconnection  41 ; to user terminal  12  via interconnection  42 , which is shown in a dashed line in part to indicate that there is no connection to bridge  30  or controller  32 , and to user terminal  13  via interconnection  43 .  
         [0016]    Similarly, user terminal  11  is interconnected to user terminal  12  via interconnection  52 ; and to user terminal  13  via interconnection  53 , which is shown in a dashed line in part to indicate that there is no connection to bridge  30  or controller  32 . User terminal  12  is connected to user terminal  13  via interconnection  63 .  
         [0017]    A preferred embodiment of the present invention includes each user terminal  10 - 14  negotiating with the other user terminals directly via session initiation protocol and the internet to determine what compatible codec the terminals have with one another.  
         [0018]    As an example, user terminal  10  originates the conference call and includes two codecs  80  and  82  while user terminal  11  includes three codecs  81 ,  82  and  83 . As a result, user terminals  10  and  11  will negotiate the use of a codec by each of the terminals via internet interconnection  41 . User terminals  10  and  11  may have many or only one codec in common. This particular common codec is codec  82  and will be selected between terminals  10  and  11 .  
         [0019]    User terminal  10  then will negotiate with user terminal  12  via internet interconnection  42 . User terminal  12  includes only one codec  82 . Therefore, the compatible codec of the user terminals  10  and  12  will be selected so that communication may be established between user terminals  10  and  12 . This compatible codec is codec  82 . If a different codec other than  82  was common between user terminals  10  and  12  this would mean that user terminal  10  must renegotiate use of the codec with user terminal  11  so as to establish a new common codec.  
         [0020]    Similarly, user terminal  10  will negotiate selection of a codec via interconnection  43  with user terminal  13 . In this example, user terminal  13  has a successful negotiation with user terminal  13  to codec  82 . User terminal will not have to renegotiate the selection of a codec with the other user terminals  11  and  12 . Again in this example, selection of an appropriate compatible codec could mean renegotiating the codec interconnections between user terminal  10  and user terminals  11  and  12 . In this embodiment, user terminals  10  through  13  negotiate codecs to a “least common denominator” (LCD) codec. That is, a codec which will support communications between any of the user terminals  10 - 13 . In this example, codec  82  met the criteria for LCD codec selection.  
         [0021]    In another embodiment, the conference bridge may be asked to convert, mix and revocode certain data packets transmitted among the conference callers. Those data packets would be limited to those for users which have different codecs than the other users in the conference call. Therefore, this embodiment would support an arrangement in which each user terminal could speak in its native bearer format (codec translation) with the other conference callers. All packets would not have to be converted, mixed and revocoded; only the packets with those special user terminals having non-homogeneous bearer formats would be required to be thusly processed. This conversion and mixing may be done by one or more of the user terminals instead of the conference bridge.  
         [0022]    The control of setting up the appropriate codecs for interfacing and negotiating to either a least common denominator codec or to codecs which are variable may be extended to add additional parties to the conference call. When each of the callers in the conference call has been suitably negotiated for a corresponding codec, the data flow is then established through the conventional conference bridge  30  to each of the data ports of the user terminals  10 - 13 .  
         [0023]    Referring to FIGS. 2 and 3, a call origination  100  conference call arrangement of FIG. 1 is shown. Party A (user terminal  10 ) is to enter into a conference call, block  101 . Party A originates a call via internet interconnection  41  to party B (user terminal  11 ), block  103 . Next, block  105  determines a common bearer format (codec) between parties A and B. A call is then originated to user terminal  12  via internet interconnection  42 , block  107 .  
         [0024]    Next, block  109  negotiates a bearer format between party A and party C (user terminal  12 ), block  109 . An attempt is made to negotiate the same bearer format (codec) as was negotiated between parties A and C. Block  110  determines whether there are any other user terminals (parties) to be interconnected to the conference call. If there are other parties to be coupled, then block  110  transfers control to block  107  for repeating the processes of blocks  107  and  109  with a new party to be coupled to the conference call. If no other user terminals (parties) are to be coupled to the conference call, then block  110  transfers control to block  111  via the NO path.  
         [0025]    Next, block  111  determines whether the user terminal support multiple interoperable bearer formats. If each of the user terminals supports multiple bearer formats, control is transferred from block  111  to block  121  via the YES path. Block  121  indicates to each of the user terminals that each of the user terminals will transmit and receive in their own native bearer format.  
         [0026]    If each of the user terminals will not support multiple bearer formats, block  111  transfers control to block  113  via the NO path. Block  113  determines whether the bearer formats which were negotiated are homogeneous. If the formats are homogeneous, block  113  transfers control to block  123  via the YES path. This indicates that there is a LCD codec for use by each of the parties. If the negotiated formats are not homogeneous, block  113  transfers control to block  115  via the NO path.  
         [0027]    Block  115  determines whether any common bearer format exists among each of the parties or users. If no common format exists, there is a failure and the conference call bridge may not be set up to all members, block  115  transfers control to block  117  via the NO path. The conference call bridge may continue to set up for a subset of the initial parties or cancel the setup completely, block  117 . If a common bearer format exists, block  115  transfers control to block  119  via the YES path. Block  119  modifies A, B, C, etc. bearer formats to obtain a common bearer format between the parties in the conference call. Then block  119  transfers control to block  123 .  
         [0028]    Block  123  originates call to conference bridge  30  with all the parties or users being addressed. The conference bridge establishes the data path communications via conference bridge  30  and controller  32 , block  125 . The bridge for conference calling is then established, block  127 .  
         [0029]    In response to the call origination process  100 , conference bridge executes, block  125 , the following setup procedure, block  141 .  
         [0030]    For example, the conference bridge  30  receives the origination request from party A with a list of targets to connect to the conference call of parties B and C, block  143 . Block  145  originates the data hook up to parties B and C.  
         [0031]    Conference bridge  30  sends a message to parties A, B and C (user terminals  10 ,  11  and  12 ) via internet interconnections  44 ,  54  and  64  to use the conference bridge as an end point for the voice packet data transmissions, block  147 . The conference bridge is then an established block  149  and procedure  140  is ended. The user terminals update their states to reflect that the conference bridge Is now the bearer endpoint, instead of the user terminals. The conference bridge is established and procedure  100  is also ended, block  127 .  
         [0032]    Turning now to FIG. 4, a flow chart of a “token” or control passing arrangement is shown. Once the conference bridge is established, control of speech is passed among the users via their user terminals. The real time protocol (RTP) is a protocol used for carrying the bearer traffic, and is associated with the session initiation protocol (SIP). SIP negotiates the kind of bearer/payloads to be transported in the RTP packets. There is a particular indicator in the header of the RTP voice packet which designates the voice packet as a packet with silence. This indicator is readily ascertainable without examining each bit of the voice sample in the packet.  
         [0033]    While in a conference bridge arrangement block  201 , the controller of the conference bridge detects if there is speech on any “leg” or input of the conference bridge, block  203 . That is, the conference bridge detects the first user terminal to provide a speech or voice input. If no speech input is detected, block  203  transfers control again to make the detection by transferring control to itself via the NO path. Silence is the lack of speech. Silence may be detected by an indicator in the header of the voice packet or by sampling the data of the packet itself. When speech is detected, block  203  will transfer control to block  205  via the YES path.  
         [0034]    Block  205  will disable the other inputs (“legs”) of the conference bridge from providing any input to the conference bridge. That is, the first speaker will seize control of the conference and other speakers will be disabled from having their voice transferred to each of the users in the conference call. Only one speaker will speak at a given time.  
         [0035]    The next block  207  initiates a “babble” timer. A babble timer is a timer set to prevent one speaker on the conference call from tying up and monopolizing the conference forever from (“babbling”) or if a noisy background causes the user terminal to never generate the silence packets, thereby monopolizing the conference bridge. The intent of the babble timer is to force the passage of control or token passing of the right to speak to another caller in the conference call at a predetermined time. The term “babble” is to prevent one speaker from babbling on forever, to prevent the noisy environment from never allowing silence packets to be generated.  
         [0036]    The next block  209  takes the input voice packet and replicates it for transmission to each of the legs or inputs of the conference call. That is, each caller in the conference call, including the speaker, receives back the voice packets input from the speaking party including the speaking party.  
         [0037]    Next, a determination is made as to whether the “babble” timer has expired, block  211 . This indicates that one speaker has monopolized the conference call and it is time to pass the control or token to another speaker in the conference call who may be initiating speech (trying to speak). If the babble timer has expired, block  211  transfers control to block  213  via the YES path. Block  213  enunciates a cut off tone or message to the present speaker so that the speaker will be aware that he is temporarily losing control of the token or control of the conference call. This means that the speaker is being forced to relinquish his ability to speak to the others in the conference call in an uninterrupted fashion.  
         [0038]    Block  215  disables the present speaker&#39;s input leg temporarily. This is so that the other input legs may be examined for speech and a determination of passing control or the token to another speaker may be made. Block  215  then transfers control to block  203  which detects bearer speech on an input leg, except for the disabled past speaker&#39;s input. If speech is not detected after a predetermined number of times of checking by block  203 , the past speaker&#39;s input will be re-enabled and he will again be able to seize the token or control of the conference call. The reader is reminded that speech is quite slow compared to today&#39;s real time processing capabilities and that the checks made by the conferencing bridge method  200  are done in fractions of a second so that the speaker who is disabled temporarily may not even know that he has been temporarily disabled from speaking. If block  203  detects speech of another speaker, the steps of blocks  205 ,  207 ,  209 ,  211  and  217  are then performed.  
         [0039]    If the babble timer has not expired, block  211  transfers control to block  217  via the NO path. Block  217  detects silence. Silence in a real time protocol SIP configuration is indicated by a particular setting in the header of each packet of speech information. Also, silence may be detected by examining the actual input stream which would be coded to indicate silence. The latter solution requires considerable real time processing power. If silence is detected, block  217  transfers control to block  203  via the NO path which indicates that the past speaker has relinquished the token and the conference bridge is waiting to detect a new speaker by block  203 . When this happens, each of the above mentioned steps is again repeated. If silence is not detected, block  217  transfers control to block  209  which replicates the input packet to all the output legs (user terminals) of the conference call. This means that the present speaker has not relinquished control and the timer has not indicated to him to release control and he is continuing to talk with his voice packets of information being distributed to each of the conference callers including himself.  
         [0040]    In the token or control passing arrangement  200 , token control is simplified by examining the header of the real time protocol to determine a data packet of silence in the preferred embodiment. This greatly simplifies the processing capability required for the conference call and such conferencing circuitry may be employed in a user terminal or even in a mobile handset. In an alternate embodiment, each data packet may be examined for the voice coded silence (as well as moise detection to determine “babble” or a noisy environment). This embodiment requires considerably more real time processing power.  
         [0041]    [0041]FIG. 5 depicts a block diagram of the conference bridge  30 . Hardware  310  includes a processor  311  interconnected with memory  312  and internet protocol based interface  313 . Memory  312  is also interconnected with IP based interface  313 . IP based interface  313  provides the bearer traffic and control signaling inputs and outputs mentioned above.  
         [0042]    The software  320  of the conference bridge includes SIP user agent server  321  which is interconnected to packet replicator  322 . Packet replicator  322  is interconnected with the token passing control logic  323  which is shown in FIG. 4. The SIP user agent server software  321  is depicted in FIGS.  1 - 3  discussed above. Packet replicator  322  is believed well known in the art and will not be discussed further. Token passing control logic  323  was previously described in FIG. 4. These various functions interact as discussed above to provide the conference bridge arrangement of the present invention.  
         [0043]    New wire line cable and DSL infrastructure is being positioned to support voice along with data. In addition, third generation mobile networks are currently being developed. Much of the new infrastructures use internet protocol technology which enables voice over internet protocol services to be supplied. The present invention leverages off of session initiation protocol applicable to such voice over internet protocol capabilities to provide a conference bridge in accordance with the above description. The present invention simplifies the way in which conference calling can work in a voice over internet protocol environment. The present conference bridge arrangement allows negotiation of codecs directly between each of the participants in a conference call. This negotiation occurs over the internet which allows each user to be found regardless of whether he is at his typical location or is in a mobile location. This eliminates the need for complex conversions and vocoding to occur at the central conference bridge. The conference bridge is greatly simplified to be a basically packet replicator and distributor. This greatly simplifies the requirements for conference bridges located within telephone operating companies or conference facilitator providers.  
         [0044]    The conference bridge is removed from handling the set up of the conference call and handles just the transmission of bearer traffic between the conference call participants. Conventional conference arrangements require the conference bridge to include virtually every conceivable codec for information interchange among varied users. In addition, the conference bridge needs to include much processing power in the form of digital signal processors to implement conversion, mixing and revocoding functions required. The present invention eliminates all such functional requirements in the conference bridge by having the user terminals themselves negotiate a compatible codec (bearer format) with the other user terminals in the conference call. Suitably equipped user terminals including remote terminals may perform the conference bridge function directly.  
         [0045]    The token control arrangement leverages off of the real time protocol (RTP) to quickly detect silence for passing the token to another caller in the conference. In addition, the token passing arrangement allows for cutting off the speaker who is monopolizing the conference call. The control for such token passing arrangements may reside even in the user terminal of one of the conference callers.  
         [0046]    Although the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated, and that form described in detail, it will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the present invention or from the scope of the appended claims:

Technology Classification (CPC): 7