label
stringclasses 2
values | text
stringlengths 165
803
|
|---|---|
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Aubrey does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Aubrey does not know whether Jeremy is thirsty. Hypothesis: Nichole can now know whether Aubrey can know whether William is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that James does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that James does not know whether Ernestine is thirsty. Hypothesis: Maria can now know that Ernestine can know whether or not everyone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Gabriel knows whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Gabriel knows whether or not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Gabriel can now know that someone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Kevin knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Kevin can now know that Tracie can know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Gregory knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Gregory can now know that Chasity can know that Chasity's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Mary's card is shown to Annie. Nona's card is shown to Annie. Mary's card is shown to Mary. Annie's card is shown to Nona. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Nona can now know whether Nona picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Dominic is not thirsty. Hypothesis: Rogelio can now know whether Mary can know that nobody is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Tina knows whether Lisa's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Lisa's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Linda can now know that Tina can know whether Lisa's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Marguerite is not thirsty. Hypothesis: Christine can now know that everyone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Barbara's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Trenton knows whether Gerald's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Richard knows whether Trenton's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Richard can now know whether Trenton can know that Gerald's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Daniel knows whether Jeremy's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Bessie can now know whether Daniel can know whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Tyree does not know whether Michelle is thirsty. Hypothesis: Michelle can now know whether Tyree can know whether Tyree is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Michael can now know that Allan can know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Charissa does not know whether Robert is thirsty. Hypothesis: Robert can now know that Karen can know that someone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Stephanie's card is shown to Stephanie. Estella's card is shown to Stephanie. Samuel's card is shown to Samuel. Estella's card is shown to Estella. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Stephanie can now know whether Estella can know whether Stephanie picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Bernice knows whether Bernice is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Paul does not know whether Christopher is thirsty. Hypothesis: Paul can now know whether or not nobody is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Mavis's card is shown to Mavis. Velma's card is shown to Mavis. Kevin's card is shown to Kevin. Kevin's card is shown to Velma. Velma's card is shown to Velma. Kevin's card is shown to Marc. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Mavis does not know whether Marc picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Velma picked a black card. Hypothesis: Mavis can now know whether Velma picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Erica does not know whether Sherman is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Erica knows whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Erica does not know whether Larry is thirsty. Hypothesis: Larry can now know that Erica is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Karl does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Karl can now know that Hyacinth's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Matthew does not know whether Jeanne is thirsty. It is publicly announced that everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Joann is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Joann is thirsty. Hypothesis: Jeanne can now know whether Jeanne is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Gary's card is shown to George. George's card is shown to Gary. Gary's card is shown to Doris. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that George does not know whether or not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: George can now know whether Gary picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Richard knows whether Gloria's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Peter knows whether Gloria's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Gloria can now know that Peter can know that Peter's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Paul does not know whether Terry is thirsty. Hypothesis: Deena can now know that Paul can know that Terry is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Van does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Jill can now know whether Daniel can know whether Daniel's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Randy's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Randy knows whether Randy's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Randy can now know whether Adalberto can know that Randy's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Mary does not know whether Terry is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Mary knows whether someone is thirsty. Hypothesis: George can now know that Michael is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Jennifer does not know whether John is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Jennifer does not know whether Eloise is thirsty. Hypothesis: Eloise can now know that John is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Patricia does not know whether Patricia's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Patricia does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Mary can now know that Patricia can know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Charles's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Marilyn can now know whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Susie knows whether Dorothy's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Susie can now know that Alan's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Luther does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Krista can now know whether Luther can know whether Peter is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Carol does not know whether Carol's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Gregory knows whether Gregory's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Gregory knows whether Gregory's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Sophie can now know whether Gregory can know that Gregory's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Lawrence's card is shown to Florida. Florida's card is shown to Lawrence. Marivel's card is shown to Lawrence. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Lawrence knows whether Florida picked a red card. Hypothesis: Lawrence can now know that someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Thomas does not know whether Joseph is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Thomas is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Joseph is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Joseph is thirsty. Hypothesis: Joseph can now know that Thomas can know whether someone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Neil does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Neil does not know whether Neil's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Herbert can now know whether Neil's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Sharon knows whether someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Sharon knows whether Sharon is thirsty. Hypothesis: Richard can now know that Sharon can know that everyone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Paul does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Heather knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Paul does not know whether Paul's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Heather knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Paul can now know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Jason's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Roy can now know that Roy's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Pauline can now know whether someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Jackie's card is shown to Jackie. Megan's card is shown to Jackie. Kris's card is shown to Jackie. Megan's card is shown to Megan. Megan's card is shown to Kris. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Megan knows whether or not everyone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Kris knows whether someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Megan can now know whether Jackie can know that someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Janet's card is shown to Miyoko. Miyoko's card is shown to Janet. Janet's card is shown to Janet. Maurice's card is shown to Janet. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Janet can now know that Maurice picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Maria can now know that Maria's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Laura's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Laura can now know whether someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Barbara knows whether Barbara's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Randy knows whether Carl's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Carl can now know that Carl's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Daniel does not know whether Daniel's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Robert can now know whether Daniel can know that Robert's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Donald knows whether Dorian's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Dorian can now know whether Dorian's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Molly knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Molly can now know that someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Terrence's card is shown to Ruth. Ruth's card is shown to Terrence. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Ruth does not know whether or not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Dena can now know that Ruth can know that Ruth picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Rebecca knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Carl can now know that Rebecca can know that Joe's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Charles knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Kathleen can now know that Natasha can know that Natasha's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Daryl's card is shown to Anna. Anna's card is shown to Rachel. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Anna can now know that Rachel picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Helen's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Francis can now know whether Helen can know that Carole's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Christopher knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Christopher can now know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Grace's card is shown to Anja. Willie's card is shown to Grace. Robert's card is shown to Robert. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Willie can now know whether Anja can know whether Anja picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that David does not know whether David's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that David does not know whether David's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Linda's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Pete can now know whether Pete's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Carol does not know whether Marion is thirsty. Hypothesis: Carol can now know whether Larry can know that Ruth is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Christopher knows whether Claude's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Claude can now know whether William's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Pei's card is shown to Gary. Danielle's card is shown to Gary. Ignacio's card is shown to Ignacio. Danielle's card is shown to Pei. Gary's card is shown to Danielle. Danielle's card is shown to Danielle. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Pei can now know that Danielle can know whether Pei picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Oliver's forehead is not muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Kimberly knows whether Oliver's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Shannon can now know whether Kimberly can know whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Virginia knows whether Virginia is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Cara knows whether or not nobody is thirsty. Hypothesis: Billy can now know whether Cara is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Paul does not know whether Paul's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Ozell's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Louis can now know that Paul can know whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Seymour does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Seymour does not know whether Todd is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Todd does not know whether Genevieve is thirsty. It is publicly announced that everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Todd can now know that Genevieve is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Robert's card is shown to Robert. Wilfred's card is shown to Wilfred. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Wilfred knows whether Wilfred picked a red card. It is publicly announced that not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Wilfred can now know that Robert can know that Robert picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Philip knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Elizabeth can now know whether Philip can know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Melissa's card is shown to Melissa. Darlene's card is shown to Melissa. Roy's card is shown to Melissa. Darlene's card is shown to Michael. Darlene's card is shown to Darlene. Darlene's card is shown to Roy. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Melissa does not know whether Michael picked a red card. Hypothesis: Melissa can now know that Roy can know whether Michael picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Margo knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Margo does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Margo does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Jeannine knows whether Jeannine's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Jordan can now know that Jeannine's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Shirley's card is shown to Shannon. Shirley's card is shown to Shirley. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Stacy can now know that Shannon can know that Stacy picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Eric knows whether Andrew's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Eric does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Andrew knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Andrew knows whether Eric's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Andrew can now know that Eric's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Bruce can now know that Linda is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Wendy knows whether Wendy's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Wendy can now know whether Donald's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Lourdes's forehead is not muddy. It is publicly announced that Lourdes's forehead is not muddy. It is publicly announced that Lourdes's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Lourdes can now know that William can know that Gertrude's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Donald knows whether Christopher's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Mary's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Donald can now know that Christopher can know that Jesse's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Stacey's card is shown to Robert. Robert's card is shown to Rachael. Stacey's card is shown to Rachael. Rachael's card is shown to Stacey. Stacey's card is shown to Stacey. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Rachael does not know whether Rachael picked a red card. Hypothesis: Rachael can now know that Stacey picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Cheryl can now know that Joe's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Kevin knows whether Michael's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Thomas's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Athena can now know that Michael's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Patricia's card is shown to Kimberly. Kimberly's card is shown to Patricia. Donna's card is shown to Patricia. Patricia's card is shown to Patricia. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Donna knows whether or not nobody picked a red card. Hypothesis: Kimberly can now know that Donna can know that Donna picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Jason does not know whether Jason's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Vickie can now know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Joseph knows whether Joseph's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Arthur can now know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Janet's card is shown to Janet. Carrie's card is shown to Janet. Janet's card is shown to Suzanne. Janet's card is shown to Carrie. Carrie's card is shown to Carrie. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Janet can now know whether Carrie picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Nell can now know that Madeleine can know whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Darlene's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Darlene can now know that Patrick can know that Patrick's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Stephen's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Stephen can now know that Shasta's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Rose's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Mildred can now know whether Rose's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Tracey knows whether or not nobody is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Loretta does not know whether Tracey is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Tracey knows whether or not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Estela can now know that everyone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Jarvis knows whether Donald's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Victoria's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Victoria can now know whether Donald can know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Samuel's card is shown to Kathryn. Emily's card is shown to Kathryn. Samuel's card is shown to Samuel. Emily's card is shown to Samuel. Kathryn's card is shown to Scott. Scott's card is shown to Emily. Emily's card is shown to Emily. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Samuel can now know whether Scott can know whether someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Shellie's card is shown to Shellie. Willie's card is shown to Shellie. Shellie's card is shown to Willie. Willie's card is shown to Willie. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Shellie knows whether or not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Willie can now know that Shellie picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Charlotte is not thirsty. Hypothesis: Gracie can now know that Charlotte is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Mildred's card is shown to Bart. Mildred's card is shown to James. James's card is shown to Mildred. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Mildred can now know that Mildred picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Dwayne's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Dwayne can now know that Christopher can know that Dwayne's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Stanley knows whether Larry's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that John's forehead is not muddy. It is publicly announced that Stanley knows whether Stanley's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: John can now know whether Stanley can know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Silvia is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Silvia knows whether or not nobody is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Silvia does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Silvia can now know whether James is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Milton knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Milton can now know that someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Eric is not thirsty. It is publicly announced that Jerry does not know whether John is thirsty. Hypothesis: Daisy can now know whether John is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Kyle's card is shown to Lisa. Monica's card is shown to Carol. Kyle's card is shown to Carol. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Lisa does not know whether Carol picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Kyle picked a black card. Hypothesis: Monica can now know that everyone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Lisa can now know whether Carolyn can know that Carolyn is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Stephanie knows whether or not nobody is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Stephanie does not know whether Tracey is thirsty. Hypothesis: Stephanie can now know whether Vickie can know whether Stephanie is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Rodney knows whether Rodney's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Lisa knows whether Rodney's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Rodney knows whether Lorena's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Lorena can now know that Patricia can know that Lorena's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Lucille's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Doris can now know whether Dewey can know whether Lucille's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Joshua can now know whether Timothy can know that someone is thirsty. |
End of preview. Expand
in Dataset Viewer.
README.md exists but content is empty.
Use the Edit dataset card button to edit it.
- Downloads last month
- 0