Datasets:

cris177

/

Arguments

like 3

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Officer Smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Officer Smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Officer Smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Officer Smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Officer Smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Officer Smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Officer Smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Officer Smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, since if officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Officer Smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, because if officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Officer Smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, as if officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Officer Smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a stolen car was reported near the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A stolen car was reported near the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a stolen car was reported near the crime scene, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A stolen car was reported near the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a stolen car was reported near the crime scene, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A stolen car was reported near the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a stolen car was reported near the crime scene, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A stolen car was reported near the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a stolen car was reported near the crime scene, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A stolen car was reported near the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a stolen car was reported near the crime scene, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A stolen car was reported near the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a stolen car was reported near the crime scene, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A stolen car was reported near the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a stolen car was reported near the crime scene, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A stolen car was reported near the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a stolen car was reported near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A stolen car was reported near the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a stolen car was reported near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A stolen car was reported near the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a stolen car was reported near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A stolen car was reported near the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a stolen car was not reported near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A stolen car was not reported near the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a stolen car was not reported near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A stolen car was not reported near the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a stolen car was not reported near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A stolen car was not reported near the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a stolen car was not reported near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A stolen car was not reported near the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a stolen car was not reported near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A stolen car was not reported near the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a stolen car was not reported near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A stolen car was not reported near the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a stolen car was not reported near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A stolen car was not reported near the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a stolen car was not reported near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A stolen car was not reported near the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A stolen car was not reported near the crime scene, since if a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A stolen car was not reported near the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A stolen car was not reported near the crime scene, because if a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A stolen car was not reported near the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A stolen car was not reported near the crime scene, as if a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was reported near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A stolen car was not reported near the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's name is laura martinez, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The victim's name is laura martinez Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's name is laura martinez, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The victim's name is laura martinez Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's name is laura martinez, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The victim's name is laura martinez Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's name is laura martinez, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The victim's name is laura martinez Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's name is laura martinez, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The victim's name is laura martinez Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's name is laura martinez, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The victim's name is laura martinez Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's name is laura martinez, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The victim's name is laura martinez Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's name is laura martinez, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The victim's name is laura martinez Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street and the victim's name is laura martinez.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The victim's name is laura martinez Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street and the victim's name is laura martinez.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The victim's name is laura martinez Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street and the victim's name is laura martinez.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The victim's name is laura martinez Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the victim's name is not laura martinez.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The victim's name is not Laura Martinez Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the victim's name is not laura martinez.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The victim's name is not Laura Martinez Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the victim's name is not laura martinez.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The victim's name is not Laura Martinez Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the victim's name is not laura martinez.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The victim's name is not Laura Martinez Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the victim's name is not laura martinez.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The victim's name is not Laura Martinez Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the victim's name is not laura martinez.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The victim's name is not Laura Martinez Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the victim's name is not laura martinez.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The victim's name is not Laura Martinez Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the victim's name is not laura martinez.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The victim's name is not Laura Martinez Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The victim's name is not laura martinez, since if the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The victim's name is not Laura Martinez Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The victim's name is not laura martinez, because if the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The victim's name is not Laura Martinez Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The victim's name is not laura martinez, as if the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is laura martinez then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The victim's name is not Laura Martinez Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect's name is john davis, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The suspect's name is john davis Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect's name is john davis, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The suspect's name is john davis Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect's name is john davis, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The suspect's name is john davis Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect's name is john davis, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The suspect's name is john davis Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect's name is john davis, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The suspect's name is john davis Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect's name is john davis, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The suspect's name is john davis Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect's name is john davis, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The suspect's name is john davis Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect's name is john davis, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The suspect's name is john davis Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street and the suspect's name is john davis.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The suspect's name is john davis Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street and the suspect's name is john davis.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The suspect's name is john davis Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street and the suspect's name is john davis.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The suspect's name is john davis Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the suspect's name is not john davis.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The suspect's name is not John Davis Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the suspect's name is not john davis.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The suspect's name is not John Davis Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the suspect's name is not john davis.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The suspect's name is not John Davis Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the suspect's name is not john davis.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The suspect's name is not John Davis Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the suspect's name is not john davis.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The suspect's name is not John Davis Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the suspect's name is not john davis.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The suspect's name is not John Davis Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the suspect's name is not john davis.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The suspect's name is not John Davis Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the suspect's name is not john davis.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The suspect's name is not John Davis Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The suspect's name is not john davis, since if the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The suspect's name is not John Davis Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The suspect's name is not john davis, because if the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The suspect's name is not John Davis Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The suspect's name is not john davis, as if the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's name is john davis then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: The suspect's name is not John Davis Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore no witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: No witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence no witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: No witness saw a masked man fleeing the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>