Dataset Card for AGIEval

Dataset Summary

AGIEval is a human-centric benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the general abilities of foundation models in tasks pertinent to human cognition and problem-solving. This benchmark is derived from 20 official, public, and high-standard admission and qualification exams intended for general human test-takers, such as general college admission tests (e.g., Chinese College Entrance Exam (Gaokao) and American SAT), law school admission tests, math competitions, lawyer qualification tests, and national civil service exams.

Citation Information

Dataset taken from the AGIEval Repo.

@misc{zhong2023agieval,
      title={AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models}, 
      author={Wanjun Zhong and Ruixiang Cui and Yiduo Guo and Yaobo Liang and Shuai Lu and Yanlin Wang and Amin Saied and Weizhu Chen and Nan Duan},
      year={2023},
      eprint={2304.06364},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.CL}
}

Citation for each dataset:

@inproceedings{ling-etal-2017-program,
    title = "Program Induction by Rationale Generation: Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problems",
    author = "Ling, Wang  and
      Yogatama, Dani  and
      Dyer, Chris  and
      Blunsom, Phil",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
    month = jul,
    year = "2017",
    address = "Vancouver, Canada",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://aclanthology.org/P17-1015",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/P17-1015",
    pages = "158--167",
    abstract = "Solving algebraic word problems requires executing a series of arithmetic operations{---}a program{---}to obtain a final answer. However, since programs can be arbitrarily complicated, inducing them directly from question-answer pairs is a formidable challenge. To make this task more feasible, we solve these problems by generating answer rationales, sequences of natural language and human-readable mathematical expressions that derive the final answer through a series of small steps. Although rationales do not explicitly specify programs, they provide a scaffolding for their structure via intermediate milestones. To evaluate our approach, we have created a new 100,000-sample dataset of questions, answers and rationales. Experimental results show that indirect supervision of program learning via answer rationales is a promising strategy for inducing arithmetic programs.",
}

@inproceedings{hendrycksmath2021,
  title={Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset},
  author={Dan Hendrycks and Collin Burns and Saurav Kadavath and Akul Arora and Steven Basart and Eric Tang and Dawn Song and Jacob Steinhardt},
  journal={NeurIPS},
  year={2021}
}

@inproceedings{Liu2020LogiQAAC,
  title={LogiQA: A Challenge Dataset for Machine Reading Comprehension with Logical Reasoning},
  author={Jian Liu and Leyang Cui and Hanmeng Liu and Dandan Huang and Yile Wang and Yue Zhang},
  booktitle={International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
  year={2020}
}

@inproceedings{zhong2019jec,
  title={JEC-QA: A Legal-Domain Question Answering Dataset},
  author={Zhong, Haoxi and Xiao, Chaojun and Tu, Cunchao and Zhang, Tianyang and Liu, Zhiyuan and Sun, Maosong},
  booktitle={Proceedings of AAAI},
  year={2020},
}

@article{Wang2021FromLT,
  title={From LSAT: The Progress and Challenges of Complex Reasoning},
  author={Siyuan Wang and Zhongkun Liu and Wanjun Zhong and Ming Zhou and Zhongyu Wei and Zhumin Chen and Nan Duan},
  journal={IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing},
  year={2021},
  volume={30},
  pages={2201-2216}
}