Datasets:

YL95

/

copa_v_wright_CPT_raw

like 0

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090130-bc014.rar attached-107499.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090130-bc014.rar attached-107499.pdf

Subject: bc014.rar attached From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com> Date: 30/01/2009, 23:04 To: nbohm@ernest.net I sent bc014.rar and bc014a.rar through gmx, now here's bc014.rar a�ached from vistomail.bc014.rar attached mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090130-bc014.rar attached-107499(75056984.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090130-bc014.rar attached-107499(75056984.1).pdf

Subject: bc014.rar attached From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com> Date: 30/01/2009, 23:04 To: nbohm@ernest.net I sent bc014.rar and bc014a.rar through gmx, now here's bc014.rar a�ached from vistomail.bc014.rar attached mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090131-Bugfix-124536.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090131-Bugfix-124536.pdf

Subject: Bugfix From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 31/01/2009, 21:13 To: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Good news! I pinpointed the bug. The bug could occur if a DNS lookup failed. The fix is at: http://www.upload.ae/file/14540/bc015-rar.html Thanks for all your help and patience with this! SatoshiBugfix mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090131-Bugfix-124536(75056995.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090131-Bugfix-124536(75056995.1).pdf

Subject: Bugfix From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 31/01/2009, 21:13 To: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Good news! I pinpointed the bug. The bug could occur if a DNS lookup failed. The fix is at: http://www.upload.ae/file/14540/bc015-rar.html Thanks for all your help and patience with this! SatoshiBugfix mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090131-Re_Another crash-122907(75056997.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090131-Re_Another crash-122907(75056997.1).pdf

Subject: RE: Another crash From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com> Date: 31/01/2009, 20:04 To: nbohm@ernest.net - Is there anything in db.log? - What opera�ng system are you using? - When it crashes, does it put up any other message boxes that say anything else? - What does it do when it crashes? Is the UI hung or is it s�ll usable? SatoshiRE: Another crash mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090131-Re_Another crash-122907.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090131-Re_Another crash-122907.pdf

Subject: RE: Another crash From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com> Date: 31/01/2009, 20:04 To: nbohm@ernest.net - Is there anything in db.log? - What opera�ng system are you using? - When it crashes, does it put up any other message boxes that say anything else? - What does it do when it crashes? Is the UI hung or is it s�ll usable? SatoshiRE: Another crash mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090211-Re_Bitcoin-164129(75057015.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090211-Re_Bitcoin-164129(75057015.1).pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 11/02/2009, 16:49 To: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Could be something else is taking CPU. Run Task Manager (taskmgr) and check if bitcoin.exe is getting >90 CPU. If not, see what is. Sometimes a page will have a broken javascript that makes your browser waste most of the CPU. If it already went back to normal, could be a fluke. Randomness bunches up sometimes. SatoshiRe: Bitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090211-Re_Bitcoin-164129.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090211-Re_Bitcoin-164129.pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 11/02/2009, 16:49 To: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Could be something else is taking CPU. Run Task Manager (taskmgr) and check if bitcoin.exe is getting >90 CPU. If not, see what is. Sometimes a page will have a broken javascript that makes your browser waste most of the CPU. If it already went back to normal, could be a fluke. Randomness bunches up sometimes. SatoshiRe: Bitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090130-Resent-101188(75056985.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090130-Resent-101188(75056985.1).pdf

Subject: Resent From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 30/01/2009, 20:21 To: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> I resent the 0.1.4 file in the previous e-mail. It also contained a bugfix for a bug that was dormant but I thought by process of elimination might have been what you had, but after you told me about Eraser I think it's more likely to have been Eraser/disk space related. I guess we are simultaneously trying to debug my e-mail. SatoshiResent mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Skeletons/Openings/Annex 1 to the Skeleton Argument of the Claimant in the COPA Claim for Trial commencing 5 February 2024.pdf

Openings

Annex 1 to the Skeleton Argument of the Claimant in the COPA Claim for Trial commencing 5 February 2024.pdf

Claim No . IL-2 021-0 00019 IN THE HIGH CO URT OF JUSTICE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES INTELLECUAL PROPERTY LIST (ChD) B E T W E E N: CRYPTO OPEN PATENT ALLIANCE (for itself and as Representative Claimant on behalf of Square, Inc., Payward Ventures, Inc. (DBA Kraken), Microstrategy, Inc., and Coinbase, Inc.) Claimant a n d CRAIG STEVEN WRIGHT Defendant ANNEX 1 to the Skeleton Argument of the Claimant in the COPA Claim for Trial commencing 5 February 2024

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090130-Resent-101188.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090130-Resent-101188.pdf

Subject: Resent From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 30/01/2009, 20:21 To: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> I resent the 0.1.4 file in the previous e-mail. It also contained a bugfix for a bug that was dormant but I thought by process of elimination might have been what you had, but after you told me about Eraser I think it's more likely to have been Eraser/disk space related. I guess we are simultaneously trying to debug my e-mail. SatoshiResent mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090130-Re_Attachment troubles - bc014.rar-108980.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090130-Re_Attachment troubles - bc014.rar-108980.pdf

Subject: Re: Attachment troubles - bc014.rar From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 30/01/2009, 23:13 To: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> I sent bc014.rar and bc014a.rar through gmx and bc014.rar through vistomail. Did you get any of them? In case all those failed (let me know), I also uploaded it to: http://www.upload.ae/file/14497/bc014-rar.html SatoshiRe: Attachment troubles - bc014.rar mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090130-Re_Attachment troubles - bc014.rar-108980(75056986.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090130-Re_Attachment troubles - bc014.rar-108980(75056986.1).pdf

Subject: Re: Attachment troubles - bc014.rar From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 30/01/2009, 23:13 To: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> I sent bc014.rar and bc014a.rar through gmx and bc014.rar through vistomail. Did you get any of them? In case all those failed (let me know), I also uploaded it to: http://www.upload.ae/file/14497/bc014-rar.html SatoshiRe: Attachment troubles - bc014.rar mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090605-Re_Bitcoin-222782.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090605-Re_Bitcoin-222782.pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 05/06/2009, 21:40 To: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> You should set your router to forward port 8333 so you can receive incoming connections. If you're not set up to receive incoming connections and nobody else who's online is, then you can't connect. It would also help solve the "(not accepted)" issues. Satoshi I've achieved a connection to bitcoin through my new router, so whatever I did must have been right. Please disregard my last message. Regards, NicholasRe: Bitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090605-Re_Bitcoin-222782(75057037.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090605-Re_Bitcoin-222782(75057037.1).pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 05/06/2009, 21:40 To: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> You should set your router to forward port 8333 so you can receive incoming connections. If you're not set up to receive incoming connections and nobody else who's online is, then you can't connect. It would also help solve the "(not accepted)" issues. Satoshi I've achieved a connection to bitcoin through my new router, so whatever I did must have been right. Please disregard my last message. Regards, NicholasRe: Bitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090131-Re_Another crash-126195.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090131-Re_Another crash-126195.pdf

Subject: Re: Another crash From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com> Date: 31/01/2009, 22:36 To: nbohm@ernest.net I guess I'd be�er send this from here also in case there's more e-mail problems. Good news! I pinpointed the bug. The bug could occur if your computer had trouble doing a DNS lookup. The fix is at: h�p://www.upload.ae/file/14540/bc015-rar.html Thanks for all your help and pa�ence with this. SatoshiRe: Another crash mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090131-Re_Another crash-126195(75056998.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090131-Re_Another crash-126195(75056998.1).pdf

Subject: Re: Another crash From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com> Date: 31/01/2009, 22:36 To: nbohm@ernest.net I guess I'd be�er send this from here also in case there's more e-mail problems. Good news! I pinpointed the bug. The bug could occur if your computer had trouble doing a DNS lookup. The fix is at: h�p://www.upload.ae/file/14540/bc015-rar.html Thanks for all your help and pa�ence with this. SatoshiRe: Another crash mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090130-Re_Bitcoin Problems-99388(75056990.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090130-Re_Bitcoin Problems-99388(75056990.1).pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin Problems From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com> Date: 30/01/2009, 20:06 To: nbohm@ernest.net Unfortunately this hasn't reached me (and I can't find it in the quaran�ned spam either) - may I trouble you to send it again? I'll then switch and run successive opera�ons on the various directories to see if I can find which one or more causes the problem. I sent it from satoshin@gmx.com because it's a lot easier to send a�achments from there. I'm resending it from there again. SatoshiRe: Bitcoin Problems mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090130-Re_Bitcoin Problems-99388.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090130-Re_Bitcoin Problems-99388.pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin Problems From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com> Date: 30/01/2009, 20:06 To: nbohm@ernest.net Unfortunately this hasn't reached me (and I can't find it in the quaran�ned spam either) - may I trouble you to send it again? I'll then switch and run successive opera�ons on the various directories to see if I can find which one or more causes the problem. I sent it from satoshin@gmx.com because it's a lot easier to send a�achments from there. I'm resending it from there again. SatoshiRe: Bitcoin Problems mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090211-Re_Bitcoin-167726.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090211-Re_Bitcoin-167726.pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 11/02/2009, 18:58 To: nbohm@ernest.net Nicholas Bohm wrote: I've looked from time to time, and Bitcoin invariably gets exactly 50% of CPU, even when System Idle Process is getting the other 50%. I assumed this was set, and had it in mind to ask you whether the setting could be changed so that Bitcoin could be given its head (e.g. overnight). Do you have a dual core system, such as a Core 2 Duo? Bitcoin currently only launches one process to generate coins but it could easily launch one for each processor. It's probably about time I implemented that. SatoshiRe: Bitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090211-Re_Bitcoin-167726(75057017.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090211-Re_Bitcoin-167726(75057017.1).pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 11/02/2009, 18:58 To: nbohm@ernest.net Nicholas Bohm wrote: I've looked from time to time, and Bitcoin invariably gets exactly 50% of CPU, even when System Idle Process is getting the other 50%. I assumed this was set, and had it in mind to ask you whether the setting could be changed so that Bitcoin could be given its head (e.g. overnight). Do you have a dual core system, such as a Core 2 Duo? Bitcoin currently only launches one process to generate coins but it could easily launch one for each processor. It's probably about time I implemented that. SatoshiRe: Bitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090222-Re__bitcoin-list_ Bitcoin v0.1.5 released-179700(75057024.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090222-Re__bitcoin-list_ Bitcoin v0.1.5 released-179700(75057024.1).pdf

Subject: Re: [bitcoin-list] Bitcoin v0.1.5 released From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com> Date: 22/02/2009, 17:35 To: nbohm@ernest.net CC: bitcoin-list@lists.sourceforge.net What's next? The next thing for v0.1.6 is to take advantage of mul�ple processors to generate blocks. Currently it only starts one thread. If you have a mul�-core processor like a Core Duo or Quad this will double or quadruple your produc�on. Later I want to add interfaces to make it really easy to integrate into websites from any server side language. Satoshi h�p://www.bitcoin.orgRe: [bitcoin-list] Bitcoin v0.1.5 released mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090222-Re_[bitcoin-list] Bitcoin v0.1.5 released-179700.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090222-Re_[bitcoin-list] Bitcoin v0.1.5 released-179700.pdf

Subject: Re: [bitcoin-list] Bitcoin v0.1.5 released From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com> Date: 22/02/2009, 17:35 To: nbohm@ernest.net CC: bitcoin-list@lists.sourceforge.net What's next? The next thing for v0.1.6 is to take advantage of mul�ple processors to generate blocks. Currently it only starts one thread. If you have a mul�-core processor like a Core Duo or Quad this will double or quadruple your produc�on. Later I want to add interfaces to make it really easy to integrate into websites from any server side language. Satoshi h�p://www.bitcoin.orgRe: [bitcoin-list] Bitcoin v0.1.5 released mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090125-Re_[bitcoin-list] Problems-61380.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090125-Re_[bitcoin-list] Problems-61380.pdf

Subject: Re: [bitcoin-list] Problems From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com> Date: 25/01/2009, 15:47 To: nbohm@ernest.net CC: bitcoin-list@lists.sourceforge.net From: Nicholas Bohm 2009-01-25 10:17 I have had a couple of problems running bitcoin: is this an appropriate list for repor�ng them (with about 70kb of a�achments)? What's the problem you're having? If you send me your debug.log file directly (best not to send a�achments to the list), I can take a look at what's happening. Satoshi Nakamoto bitcoin-help at vistomail dot comRe: [bitcoin-list] Problems mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090125-Re__bitcoin-list_ Problems-61380(75056973.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090125-Re__bitcoin-list_ Problems-61380(75056973.1).pdf

Subject: Re: [bitcoin-list] Problems From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com> Date: 25/01/2009, 15:47 To: nbohm@ernest.net CC: bitcoin-list@lists.sourceforge.net From: Nicholas Bohm 2009-01-25 10:17 I have had a couple of problems running bitcoin: is this an appropriate list for repor�ng them (with about 70kb of a�achments)? What's the problem you're having? If you send me your debug.log file directly (best not to send a�achments to the list), I can take a look at what's happening. Satoshi Nakamoto bitcoin-help at vistomail dot comRe: [bitcoin-list] Problems mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090524-Re_Bitcoin-205277.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090524-Re_Bitcoin-205277.pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 24/05/2009, 21:45 To: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> That's the transaction fee feature. If you generate a block containing a transaction that includes a transaction fee, you earn the transaction fee in addition to the 50.00. Someone must have included a 0.10 fee with one of their transactions. The setting to do that is under options. Including a fee is completely optional, more of a donation to nodes for helping out. Bitcoin continues to run smoothly, but I noticed an unusual event: 731 blocks 11/05/2009 15:58 Generated +50.10 All prior and subsequent generated packers have been of exactly 50. Just in case this is of interest! Regards, NicholasRe: Bitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090524-Re_Bitcoin-205277(75057032.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090524-Re_Bitcoin-205277(75057032.1).pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 24/05/2009, 21:45 To: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> That's the transaction fee feature. If you generate a block containing a transaction that includes a transaction fee, you earn the transaction fee in addition to the 50.00. Someone must have included a 0.10 fee with one of their transactions. The setting to do that is under options. Including a fee is completely optional, more of a donation to nodes for helping out. Bitcoin continues to run smoothly, but I noticed an unusual event: 731 blocks 11/05/2009 15:58 Generated +50.10 All prior and subsequent generated packers have been of exactly 50. Just in case this is of interest! Regards, NicholasRe: Bitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090613-[bitcoin-list] Bitcoin website update-224888.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090613-[bitcoin-list] Bitcoin website update-224888.pdf

Subject: [bitcoin-list] Bitcoin website update From: mmalmi@cc.hut.fi Date: 13/06/2009, 07:41 To: bitcoin-list@lists.sourceforge.net The new Bitcoin website/portal is up at bitcoin.sourceforge.net. Forums and a wiki are included, so you're welcome to join discussion and wiki documentation. Martti Malmi Bitcoin Web Developer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ bitcoin-list mailing list bitcoin-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-list[bitcoin-list] Bitcoin website update mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090613-_bitcoin-list_ Bitcoin website update-224888(75057038.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090613-_bitcoin-list_ Bitcoin website update-224888(75057038.1).pdf

Subject: [bitcoin-list] Bitcoin website update From: mmalmi@cc.hut.fi Date: 13/06/2009, 07:41 To: bitcoin-list@lists.sourceforge.net The new Bitcoin website/portal is up at bitcoin.sourceforge.net. Forums and a wiki are included, so you're welcome to join discussion and wiki documentation. Martti Malmi Bitcoin Web Developer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ bitcoin-list mailing list bitcoin-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-list[bitcoin-list] Bitcoin website update mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090130-[bitcoin-list] Bitcoin works with Wine _ Ubuntu-89022.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090130-[bitcoin-list] Bitcoin works with Wine _ Ubuntu-89022.pdf

Subject: [bitcoin-list] Bitcoin works with Wine / Ubuntu From: Jeff Kane <kanegs@gmail.com> Date: 30/01/2009, 02:39 To: bitcoin-list@lists.sourceforge.net Just an FYI that Bitcoin 0.1.3 works fine on Ubuntu 8.10 running Wine 1.0.1 Let me know if you have any questions. Jeff -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jeff Kane kanegs@gmail.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ bitcoin-list mailing list bitcoin-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-list[bitcoin-list] Bitcoin works with Wine / Ubuntu mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090130-_bitcoin-list_ Bitcoin works with Wine _ Ubuntu-89022(75056993.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090130-_bitcoin-list_ Bitcoin works with Wine _ Ubuntu-89022(75056993.1).pdf

Subject: [bitcoin-list] Bitcoin works with Wine / Ubuntu From: Jeff Kane <kanegs@gmail.com> Date: 30/01/2009, 02:39 To: bitcoin-list@lists.sourceforge.net Just an FYI that Bitcoin 0.1.3 works fine on Ubuntu 8.10 running Wine 1.0.1 Let me know if you have any questions. Jeff -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jeff Kane kanegs@gmail.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ bitcoin-list mailing list bitcoin-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-list[bitcoin-list] Bitcoin works with Wine / Ubuntu mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090605-Bitcoin-221796.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090605-Bitcoin-221796.pdf

Subject: Bitcoin From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 05/06/2009, 11:24 To: satoshi@vistomail.com I've achieved a connection to bitcoin through my new router, so whatever I did must have been right. Please disregard my last message. Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFBitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090605-Bitcoin-221796(75057036.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090605-Bitcoin-221796(75057036.1).pdf

Subject: Bitcoin From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 05/06/2009, 11:24 To: satoshi@vistomail.com I've achieved a connection to bitcoin through my new router, so whatever I did must have been right. Please disregard my last message. Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFBitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090719-Re_Bitcoin-231340.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090719-Re_Bitcoin-231340.pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 19/07/2009, 04:07 To: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Did your IP address change? And if so, what's the new address? I run a node but I can't accept incoming connections and if your IP address changed then I would have lost contact with you. There may just not be anybody else running it right now. How many connections did you usually have before? If you keep your server running, if new users come along at least they'll have someone to connect to, rather than get no connections and give up. (btw, it's better if you use my satoshin@gmx.com e-mail address) Satoshi Bitcoin has failed to establish any connections for the last day or so, despite restarts. I'm not aware of having made any changes to my system, so this is puzzling. Can you suggest what I might check? Regards, NicholasRe: Bitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090125-Problems-60394.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090125-Problems-60394.pdf

Subject: Problems From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 25/01/2009, 10:17 To: bitcoin-list@lists.sourceforge.net I have had a couple of problems running bitcoin: is this an appropriate list for reporting them (with about 70kb of attachments)? Nicholas Bohm -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFProblems mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090719-Re_Bitcoin-231340(75057041.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090719-Re_Bitcoin-231340(75057041.1).pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 19/07/2009, 04:07 To: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Did your IP address change? And if so, what's the new address? I run a node but I can't accept incoming connections and if your IP address changed then I would have lost contact with you. There may just not be anybody else running it right now. How many connections did you usually have before? If you keep your server running, if new users come along at least they'll have someone to connect to, rather than get no connections and give up. (btw, it's better if you use my satoshin@gmx.com e-mail address) Satoshi Bitcoin has failed to establish any connections for the last day or so, despite restarts. I'm not aware of having made any changes to my system, so this is puzzling. Can you suggest what I might check? Regards, NicholasRe: Bitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090125-Problems-60394(75056972.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090125-Problems-60394(75056972.1).pdf

Subject: Problems From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 25/01/2009, 10:17 To: bitcoin-list@lists.sourceforge.net I have had a couple of problems running bitcoin: is this an appropriate list for reporting them (with about 70kb of attachments)? Nicholas Bohm -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFProblems mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090203-Bitcoin-155600.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090203-Bitcoin-155600.pdf

Subject: Bitcoin From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 03/02/2009, 23:04 To: satoshi@vistomail.com The bc19.01 came back pretty swiftly! It hadn't in fact occurred to me that you could use hundredths, though it's true that that is fairly conventional for currencies. Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFBitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090203-Bitcoin-155600(75057004.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090203-Bitcoin-155600(75057004.1).pdf

Subject: Bitcoin From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 03/02/2009, 23:04 To: satoshi@vistomail.com The bc19.01 came back pretty swiftly! It hadn't in fact occurred to me that you could use hundredths, though it's true that that is fairly conventional for currencies. Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFBitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090718-Bitcoin-230287.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090718-Bitcoin-230287.pdf

Subject: Bitcoin From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 18/07/2009, 09:59 To: satoshi@vistomail.com Bitcoin has failed to establish any connections for the last day or so, despite restarts. I'm not aware of having made any changes to my system, so this is puzzling. Can you suggest what I might check? Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFBitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090718-Bitcoin-230287(75057040.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090718-Bitcoin-230287(75057040.1).pdf

Subject: Bitcoin From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 18/07/2009, 09:59 To: satoshi@vistomail.com Bitcoin has failed to establish any connections for the last day or so, despite restarts. I'm not aware of having made any changes to my system, so this is puzzling. Can you suggest what I might check? Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFBitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Martti Malmi - Exhibits/Martti Malmi - Exhibit MM2.pdf

Martti Malmi - Exhibits

Martti Malmi - Exhibit MM2.pdf

From: Craig S Wright[craig.wright@hotwirepe.com] Sent: Fri 6/12/2015 3:11:23 AM (UTC+01:00) To: sirius@iki.fi[sirius@iki.fi] Cc: tim@pastoor.cc[tim@pastoor.cc] Subject: Identifi Good morning, How are you placed next week for a talk? I want to ask a few questions as to the code first and directions. Following a request from Tim if he did not inform you. I am not alwayss so brief ðJ Regards, __/ __/ __/ __/ __/ __/ __/ __/ __/ __/ __/ __/ __/ Dr. Craig S Wright GSE LLM Chief Executive Officer DeMorgan Limited (ACN 601 560 525) Aust: +61 (02) 9188 2051 USA: +1 (408) 520-9521 Mobile: + 61.417.683.914 craig.wright@ hotwirepe.com __/ __/ __/ __/ __/ __/ __/ __/ __/ __/ __/ __/ __/

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090210-Bitcoin-163070(75057014.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090210-Bitcoin-163070(75057014.1).pdf

Subject: Bitcoin From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 10/02/2009, 17:45 To: satoshi@vistomail.com A follow-up to my earlier message: today's first packet has now been generated, at 16:54, and had accumulated 7 blocks within its first hour. Previous first packets of the day have usually been around 03:00. Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFBitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090210-Bitcoin-163070.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090210-Bitcoin-163070.pdf

Subject: Bitcoin From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 10/02/2009, 17:45 To: satoshi@vistomail.com A follow-up to my earlier message: today's first packet has now been generated, at 16:54, and had accumulated 7 blocks within its first hour. Previous first packets of the day have usually been around 03:00. Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFBitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090604-Bitcoin-220712.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090604-Bitcoin-220712.pdf

Subject: Bitcoin From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 04/06/2009, 10:21 To: satoshi@vistomail.com I've installed a new router and cannot get Bitcoin to connect. I've altered the firewall rule to allow inbound services via SMTP, which seems to be the name for port 25. Is that right? Should there be anything else I ought to do? Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFBitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090604-Bitcoin-220712(75057035.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090604-Bitcoin-220712(75057035.1).pdf

Subject: Bitcoin From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 04/06/2009, 10:21 To: satoshi@vistomail.com I've installed a new router and cannot get Bitcoin to connect. I've altered the firewall rule to allow inbound services via SMTP, which seems to be the name for port 25. Is that right? Should there be anything else I ought to do? Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFBitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090517-Bitcoin-201130.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090517-Bitcoin-201130.pdf

Subject: Bitcoin From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 17/05/2009, 11:11 To: satoshi@vistomail.com Bitcoin continues to run smoothly, but I noticed an unusual event: 731 blocks 11/05/2009 15:58 Generated +50.10 All prior and subsequent generated packers have been of exactly 50. Just in case this is of interest! Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFBitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090517-Bitcoin-201130(75057030.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090517-Bitcoin-201130(75057030.1).pdf

Subject: Bitcoin From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 17/05/2009, 11:11 To: satoshi@vistomail.com Bitcoin continues to run smoothly, but I noticed an unusual event: 731 blocks 11/05/2009 15:58 Generated +50.10 All prior and subsequent generated packers have been of exactly 50. Just in case this is of interest! Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFBitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090203-Re_All's well-154345(75057011.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090203-Re_All's well-154345(75057011.1).pdf

Subject: Re: All's well From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 03/02/2009, 22:51 To: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Just to say the sending seemed very straightforward, as was the resulting entry. And when you get used to the double-click, it's actually simpler than a right-click and selecting from a menu. So perhaps it's just a matter of user guidance. Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFRe: All's well mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090203-Re_All's well-154345.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090203-Re_All's well-154345.pdf

Subject: Re: All's well From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 03/02/2009, 22:51 To: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Just to say the sending seemed very straightforward, as was the resulting entry. And when you get used to the double-click, it's actually simpler than a right-click and selecting from a menu. So perhaps it's just a matter of user guidance. Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFRe: All's well mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090130-Re_Bitcoin Problems-85751.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090130-Re_Bitcoin Problems-85751.pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin Problems From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 30/01/2009, 15:50 To: satoshi@vistomail.com Bitcoin continues to run without failures since I stopped scheduled Eraser operations. If you can tell me which temporary folders Bitcoin uses, I could try and replicate the fault by trying one-off operations. (It would also be useful to know which files or folders I need to back up in order to preserve my accumulated hoard of bitcoins.) Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFRe: Bitcoin Problems mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090130-Re_Bitcoin Problems-85751(75056987.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090130-Re_Bitcoin Problems-85751(75056987.1).pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin Problems From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 30/01/2009, 15:50 To: satoshi@vistomail.com Bitcoin continues to run without failures since I stopped scheduled Eraser operations. If you can tell me which temporary folders Bitcoin uses, I could try and replicate the fault by trying one-off operations. (It would also be useful to know which files or folders I need to back up in order to preserve my accumulated hoard of bitcoins.) Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFRe: Bitcoin Problems mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090218-Bitcoin v0.1.5 released-178421.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090218-Bitcoin v0.1.5 released-178421.pdf

Subject: Bitcoin v0.1.5 released From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 18/02/2009, 14:55 To: bitcoin-list@lists.sourceforge.net Version 0.1.5 seems to be running trouble free. I have a list of 201 transactions, I've accumulated about bc8550. Transfers in and out seem to work fine (after a bit of head-scratching to understand the labelling of incoming transactions). What's next? Nicholas Bohm -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFBitcoin v0.1.5 released mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090218-Bitcoin v0.1.5 released-178421(75057023.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090218-Bitcoin v0.1.5 released-178421(75057023.1).pdf

Subject: Bitcoin v0.1.5 released From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 18/02/2009, 14:55 To: bitcoin-list@lists.sourceforge.net Version 0.1.5 seems to be running trouble free. I have a list of 201 transactions, I've accumulated about bc8550. Transfers in and out seem to work fine (after a bit of head-scratching to understand the labelling of incoming transactions). What's next? Nicholas Bohm -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFBitcoin v0.1.5 released mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090129-Re_[bitcoin-list] Problems-84459.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090129-Re_[bitcoin-list] Problems-84459.pdf

Subject: Re: [bitcoin-list] Problems From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 29/01/2009, 19:05 To: satoshi@vistomail.com Satoshi Nakamoto wrote: Thanks for the update. There are many programs named Eraser, do you know where I could find it or the name of the company that makes it or a keyword to search on? Sorry not to be more specific: it's free software from www.heidi.ie/eraser/ Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFRe: [bitcoin-list] Problems mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090129-Re__bitcoin-list_ Problems-84459(75056983.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090129-Re__bitcoin-list_ Problems-84459(75056983.1).pdf

Subject: Re: [bitcoin-list] Problems From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 29/01/2009, 19:05 To: satoshi@vistomail.com Satoshi Nakamoto wrote: Thanks for the update. There are many programs named Eraser, do you know where I could find it or the name of the company that makes it or a keyword to search on? Sorry not to be more specific: it's free software from www.heidi.ie/eraser/ Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFRe: [bitcoin-list] Problems mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090210-Bitcoin-161821.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090210-Bitcoin-161821.pdf

Subject: Bitcoin From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 10/02/2009, 16:45 To: satoshi@vistomail.com Just to let you know that Bitcoin has generated no new packets today, although it typically generates 8 to 10 packets each day (although sometimes fewer), and the option to generate is ticked. Existing packets are proceedings towards maturity, or have matured, at about the usual rate. Progress to maturity takes around 21 to 23 hours. I thought this was an anomaly that might be of interest. regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFBitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090129-Re__bitcoin-list_ Problems-80862(75056981.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090129-Re__bitcoin-list_ Problems-80862(75056981.1).pdf

Subject: Re: [bitcoin-list] Problems From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 29/01/2009, 15:09 To: satoshi@vistomail.com I have had no further problems since I ceased running a daily late evening scheduled operation consisting of a wipe of various folders containing temporary files using Eraser. Whether this operation accounted for the crashes I don't know, as Eraser has never had that effect before, and typically ignores any file it finds to be in use. Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFRe: [bitcoin-list] Problems mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090129-Re_[bitcoin-list] Problems-80862.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090129-Re_[bitcoin-list] Problems-80862.pdf

Subject: Re: [bitcoin-list] Problems From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 29/01/2009, 15:09 To: satoshi@vistomail.com I have had no further problems since I ceased running a daily late evening scheduled operation consisting of a wipe of various folders containing temporary files using Eraser. Whether this operation accounted for the crashes I don't know, as Eraser has never had that effect before, and typically ignores any file it finds to be in use. Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFRe: [bitcoin-list] Problems mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090210-Bitcoin-161821(75057013.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090210-Bitcoin-161821(75057013.1).pdf

Subject: Bitcoin From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 10/02/2009, 16:45 To: satoshi@vistomail.com Just to let you know that Bitcoin has generated no new packets today, although it typically generates 8 to 10 packets each day (although sometimes fewer), and the option to generate is ticked. Existing packets are proceedings towards maturity, or have matured, at about the usual rate. Progress to maturity takes around 21 to 23 hours. I thought this was an anomaly that might be of interest. regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFBitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090212-Bitcoin UI question-171698.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090212-Bitcoin UI question-171698.pdf

Subject: Bitcoin UI question From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 12/02/2009, 17:52 To: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> The bottom of the UI shows: Generating 4 connections 4024 blocks 164 transactions I understand "generating"; I assume I am connected to 4 other nodes; and I know I have recorded 164 transactions (including failed generation attempts). I'm not clear what the "blocks" figure describes. It's much smaller than the total of all the blocks shown against all my transactions. Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFBitcoin UI question mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090212-Bitcoin UI question-171698(75057019.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090212-Bitcoin UI question-171698(75057019.1).pdf

Subject: Bitcoin UI question From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 12/02/2009, 17:52 To: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> The bottom of the UI shows: Generating 4 connections 4024 blocks 164 transactions I understand "generating"; I assume I am connected to 4 other nodes; and I know I have recorded 164 transactions (including failed generation attempts). I'm not clear what the "blocks" figure describes. It's much smaller than the total of all the blocks shown against all my transactions. Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFBitcoin UI question mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090213-Re_Bitcoin UI question-172968.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090213-Re_Bitcoin UI question-172968.pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin UI question From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 13/02/2009, 15:09 To: nbohm@ernest.net It's the total number of blocks in the block chain, meaning the network's block chain, which everyone has a copy of. Every Bitcoin node displays the same number and it goes up about every 10 minutes whenever someone generates a block. When you haven't had it running for a while, once you're connected it spins up rapidly as it downloads what was generated while you were gone to catch up. I'm not sure exactly how to describe it (that would fit on the status bar in 1 word, maybe 2 words max), any ideas? The blocks number in the status column next to your transactions is the number of blocks that have come after that transaction. Your transaction is essentially "in" that many blocks. Satoshi Nicholas Bohm wrote: The bottom of the UI shows: Generating 4 connections 4024 blocks 164 transactions I understand "generating"; I assume I am connected to 4 other nodes; and I know I have recorded 164 transactions (including failed generation attempts). I'm not clear what the "blocks" figure describes. It's much smaller than the total of all the blocks shown against all my transactions. Regards, NicholasRe: Bitcoin UI question mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090213-Re_Bitcoin UI question-172968(75057021.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090213-Re_Bitcoin UI question-172968(75057021.1).pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin UI question From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 13/02/2009, 15:09 To: nbohm@ernest.net It's the total number of blocks in the block chain, meaning the network's block chain, which everyone has a copy of. Every Bitcoin node displays the same number and it goes up about every 10 minutes whenever someone generates a block. When you haven't had it running for a while, once you're connected it spins up rapidly as it downloads what was generated while you were gone to catch up. I'm not sure exactly how to describe it (that would fit on the status bar in 1 word, maybe 2 words max), any ideas? The blocks number in the status column next to your transactions is the number of blocks that have come after that transaction. Your transaction is essentially "in" that many blocks. Satoshi Nicholas Bohm wrote: The bottom of the UI shows: Generating 4 connections 4024 blocks 164 transactions I understand "generating"; I assume I am connected to 4 other nodes; and I know I have recorded 164 transactions (including failed generation attempts). I'm not clear what the "blocks" figure describes. It's much smaller than the total of all the blocks shown against all my transactions. Regards, NicholasRe: Bitcoin UI question mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090403-Generated (not accepted)-193026.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090403-Generated (not accepted)-193026.pdf

Subject: Generated (not accepted) From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 03/04/2009, 12:39 To: satoshi@vistomail.com I'm having an unusual run of failures, and thought I'd let you know in case this was of any significance. Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FF Deleted:Screenshot.png The original MIME headers for this a�achment are: Content-Type: image/png; name="Screenshot.png" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposi�on: inline; filename="Screenshot.png" Attachments: Deleted:Screenshot.png 197 bytesGenerated (not accepted) mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090403-Generated (not accepted)-193026(75057027.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090403-Generated (not accepted)-193026(75057027.1).pdf

Subject: Generated (not accepted) From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 03/04/2009, 12:39 To: satoshi@vistomail.com I'm having an unusual run of failures, and thought I'd let you know in case this was of any significance. Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FF Deleted:Screenshot.png The original MIME headers for this a�achment are: Content-Type: image/png; name="Screenshot.png" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposi�on: inline; filename="Screenshot.png" Attachments: Deleted:Screenshot.png 197 bytesGenerated (not accepted) mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090721-Re_Bitcoin-241473.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090721-Re_Bitcoin-241473.pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 21/07/2009, 02:37 To: nbohm@ernest.net The transaction fee setting refers to the amount you give when you make a transaction, not the amount you demand from transactions you process. We're a long way from the point where nodes will need to require a fee, but that can easily be implemented when needed. Nicholas Bohm wrote: Satoshi Nakamoto wrote: I guess something must be preventing you from receiving incoming connections. Mine has been trying to connect to your IP without success. I'm currently connected to 70.113.114.209 since yesterday. If you're not at least connected to that one, then you can't connect out either. I still had no connections, and couldn't see why not; but I stopped and restarted bitcoin, and now have two connections. Although this is fewer than for some weeks, and I have a clutch of "not confirmed" blocks when for some weeks I had had none, at least it's up and running again. Previous restarts made no difference, though. Incidentally, I set the optional transaction fee at 0.07. I expected this to be visible as an outgoing (or as a deduction from blocks created), but so far I've seen nothing. Perhaps I've had no takers. Regards, NicholasRe: Bitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090721-Re_Bitcoin-241473(75057046.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090721-Re_Bitcoin-241473(75057046.1).pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 21/07/2009, 02:37 To: nbohm@ernest.net The transaction fee setting refers to the amount you give when you make a transaction, not the amount you demand from transactions you process. We're a long way from the point where nodes will need to require a fee, but that can easily be implemented when needed. Nicholas Bohm wrote: Satoshi Nakamoto wrote: I guess something must be preventing you from receiving incoming connections. Mine has been trying to connect to your IP without success. I'm currently connected to 70.113.114.209 since yesterday. If you're not at least connected to that one, then you can't connect out either. I still had no connections, and couldn't see why not; but I stopped and restarted bitcoin, and now have two connections. Although this is fewer than for some weeks, and I have a clutch of "not confirmed" blocks when for some weeks I had had none, at least it's up and running again. Previous restarts made no difference, though. Incidentally, I set the optional transaction fee at 0.07. I expected this to be visible as an outgoing (or as a deduction from blocks created), but so far I've seen nothing. Perhaps I've had no takers. Regards, NicholasRe: Bitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090720-Re_Bitcoin-235816(75057043.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090720-Re_Bitcoin-235816(75057043.1).pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 20/07/2009, 16:05 To: nbohm@ernest.net I guess something must be preventing you from receiving incoming connections. Mine has been trying to connect to your IP without success. I'm currently connected to 70.113.114.209 since yesterday. If you're not at least connected to that one, then you can't connect out either. Satoshi Nicholas Bohm wrote: Satoshi Nakamoto wrote: Did your IP address change? And if so, what's the new address? I run a node but I can't accept incoming connections and if your IP address changed then I would have lost contact with you. My IP address is 217.146.110.206, and hasn't changed for quite a time as far as I know. There may just not be anybody else running it right now. How many connections did you usually have before? It varied from 3 to 5 mostly. If you keep your server running, if new users come along at least they'll have someone to connect to, rather than get no connections and give up. I'll leave it running. No blocks of coins have matured since 15th July. (btw, it's better if you use my satoshin@gmx.com e-mail address) OK Regards, NicholasRe: Bitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090720-Re_Bitcoin-235816.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090720-Re_Bitcoin-235816.pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 20/07/2009, 16:05 To: nbohm@ernest.net I guess something must be preventing you from receiving incoming connections. Mine has been trying to connect to your IP without success. I'm currently connected to 70.113.114.209 since yesterday. If you're not at least connected to that one, then you can't connect out either. Satoshi Nicholas Bohm wrote: Satoshi Nakamoto wrote: Did your IP address change? And if so, what's the new address? I run a node but I can't accept incoming connections and if your IP address changed then I would have lost contact with you. My IP address is 217.146.110.206, and hasn't changed for quite a time as far as I know. There may just not be anybody else running it right now. How many connections did you usually have before? It varied from 3 to 5 mostly. If you keep your server running, if new users come along at least they'll have someone to connect to, rather than get no connections and give up. I'll leave it running. No blocks of coins have matured since 15th July. (btw, it's better if you use my satoshin@gmx.com e-mail address) OK Regards, NicholasRe: Bitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090201-Re_Another crash-130495.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090201-Re_Another crash-130495.pdf

Subject: Re: Another crash From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 01/02/2009, 22:52 To: satoshi@vistomail.com Satoshi Nakamoto wrote: ... BTW, I sent a transfer to your Bitcoin address in case you're curious what that looks like. (It can only get "from" and comment info if you can receive incoming connections) Thank you! I now see: 35 blocks 01/02/2009 16:25 Received with: !Me 1CHE5JRfc5mr8ZtVUP7nnsS5HC4bWcXoc6 +100.00 It slowly begins to feel a little more real. (And no further crashes yet.) Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFRe: Another crash mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090201-Re_Another crash-130495(75057001.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090201-Re_Another crash-130495(75057001.1).pdf

Subject: Re: Another crash From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 01/02/2009, 22:52 To: satoshi@vistomail.com Satoshi Nakamoto wrote: ... BTW, I sent a transfer to your Bitcoin address in case you're curious what that looks like. (It can only get "from" and comment info if you can receive incoming connections) Thank you! I now see: 35 blocks 01/02/2009 16:25 Received with: !Me 1CHE5JRfc5mr8ZtVUP7nnsS5HC4bWcXoc6 +100.00 It slowly begins to feel a little more real. (And no further crashes yet.) Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFRe: Another crash mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090202-All's well-131923.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090202-All's well-131923.pdf

Subject: All's well From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 02/02/2009, 11:27 To: satoshi@vistomail.com No further trouble; but whereas the UI at first showed your transfer as: 35 blocks 01/02/2009 16:25 Received with: !Me 1CHE5JRfc5mr8ZtVUP7nnsS5HC4bWcXoc6 +100.00 it now (the morning after) shows: 98 blocks 01/02/2009 16:25 Received with: Satoshi Nakamoto 1CHE5JRfc5mr8ZtVUP7nnsS5HC4bWcXoc6 +100.00 Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFAll's well mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090202-All's well-131923(75057002.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090202-All's well-131923(75057002.1).pdf

Subject: All's well From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 02/02/2009, 11:27 To: satoshi@vistomail.com No further trouble; but whereas the UI at first showed your transfer as: 35 blocks 01/02/2009 16:25 Received with: !Me 1CHE5JRfc5mr8ZtVUP7nnsS5HC4bWcXoc6 +100.00 it now (the morning after) shows: 98 blocks 01/02/2009 16:25 Received with: Satoshi Nakamoto 1CHE5JRfc5mr8ZtVUP7nnsS5HC4bWcXoc6 +100.00 Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFAll's well mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090130-Re_Resent-102984(75056991.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090130-Re_Resent-102984(75056991.1).pdf

Subject: Re: Resent From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 30/01/2009, 21:54 To: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Satoshi Nakamoto wrote: I resent the 0.1.4 file in the previous e-mail. It also contained a bugfix for a bug that was dormant but I thought by process of elimination might have been what you had, but after you told me about Eraser I think it's more likely to have been Eraser/disk space related. I guess we are simultaneously trying to debug my e-mail. We seem to be, as I can only find two messages from you, the one above and the one from vistomail, and neither has any attachments. (I have also again checked the spam quarantine.) So something odd is happening. Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFRe: Resent mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090130-Re_Resent-102984.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090130-Re_Resent-102984.pdf

Subject: Re: Resent From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 30/01/2009, 21:54 To: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Satoshi Nakamoto wrote: I resent the 0.1.4 file in the previous e-mail. It also contained a bugfix for a bug that was dormant but I thought by process of elimination might have been what you had, but after you told me about Eraser I think it's more likely to have been Eraser/disk space related. I guess we are simultaneously trying to debug my e-mail. We seem to be, as I can only find two messages from you, the one above and the one from vistomail, and neither has any attachments. (I have also again checked the spam quarantine.) So something odd is happening. Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFRe: Resent mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090127-Re_[bitcoin-list] Problems-87111.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090127-Re_[bitcoin-list] Problems-87111.pdf

Subject: Re: [bitcoin-list] Problems From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 27/01/2009, 13:03 To: satoshi@vistomail.com Two further crashes yesterday at 21:16 and 23:59 (GMT). They seem to follow exactly the same pattern, and I don't know if there is likely to be anything informative in the log, but I attach it in case. Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FF Deleted:debug.rar The original MIME headers for this a�achment are: Content-Type: applica�on/octet-stream; name="debug.rar" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposi�on: a�achment; filename="debug.rar" Attachments: Deleted:debug.rar 206 bytesRe: [bitcoin-list] Problems mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090127-Re__bitcoin-list_ Problems-87111(75056979.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090127-Re__bitcoin-list_ Problems-87111(75056979.1).pdf

Subject: Re: [bitcoin-list] Problems From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 27/01/2009, 13:03 To: satoshi@vistomail.com Two further crashes yesterday at 21:16 and 23:59 (GMT). They seem to follow exactly the same pattern, and I don't know if there is likely to be anything informative in the log, but I attach it in case. Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FF Deleted:debug.rar The original MIME headers for this a�achment are: Content-Type: applica�on/octet-stream; name="debug.rar" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposi�on: a�achment; filename="debug.rar" Attachments: Deleted:debug.rar 206 bytesRe: [bitcoin-list] Problems mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090129-Re_[bitcoin-list] Problems-82226.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090129-Re_[bitcoin-list] Problems-82226.pdf

Subject: Re: [bitcoin-list] Problems From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com> Date: 29/01/2009, 18:29 To: nbohm@ernest.net Thanks for the update. There are many programs named Eraser, do you know where I could find it or the name of the company that makes it or a keyword to search on? Satoshi I have had no further problems since I ceased running a daily late evening scheduled opera�on consis�ng of a wipe of various folders containing temporary files using Eraser. Whether this opera�on accounted for the crashes I don't know, as Eraser has never had that effect before, and typically ignores any file it finds to be in use. Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stor�ord CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFRe: [bitcoin-list] Problems mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090129-Re__bitcoin-list_ Problems-82226(75056982.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090129-Re__bitcoin-list_ Problems-82226(75056982.1).pdf

Subject: Re: [bitcoin-list] Problems From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com> Date: 29/01/2009, 18:29 To: nbohm@ernest.net Thanks for the update. There are many programs named Eraser, do you know where I could find it or the name of the company that makes it or a keyword to search on? Satoshi I have had no further problems since I ceased running a daily late evening scheduled opera�on consis�ng of a wipe of various folders containing temporary files using Eraser. Whether this opera�on accounted for the crashes I don't know, as Eraser has never had that effect before, and typically ignores any file it finds to be in use. Regards, Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stor�ord CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFRe: [bitcoin-list] Problems mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090406-Re_Generated (not accepted)-194684.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090406-Re_Generated (not accepted)-194684.pdf

Subject: Re: Generated (not accepted) From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 06/04/2009, 02:54 To: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> What rate of not-accepted did you see? I didn't see anything unusual on my end. If you had more than, say, 4 in a row, that would be abnormal and probably a loss of network communication. If it's scattered and less than 25%, just random bad luck. It's normal and harmless to randomly get some per cent of not-accepted, and of course randomness can sometimes bunch up and look like a pattern. The idea of an option to View/Hide unaccepted blocks is a good one, as well as View/Hide all generated blocks so you can more easily see incoming transactions. Seeing the unaccepted blocks is just annoying and frustrating. Everyone faces the same rate of unaccepted, it's just a part of the process. It would probably be best to default to hide unaccepted blocks, so as not to show giving and taking away something that never was, and not show new generated blocks at all until they have at least one confirmation. It would only mean finding out you have a generated block 15 minutes later than normal, and then you still have 119 blocks to go before it matures anyway. This is on the to-do list for v0.1.6. Satoshi I'm having an unusual run of failures, and thought I'd let you know in case this was of any significance. Regards, NicholasRe: Generated (not accepted) mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090406-Re_Generated (not accepted)-194684(75057028.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090406-Re_Generated (not accepted)-194684(75057028.1).pdf

Subject: Re: Generated (not accepted) From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 06/04/2009, 02:54 To: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> What rate of not-accepted did you see? I didn't see anything unusual on my end. If you had more than, say, 4 in a row, that would be abnormal and probably a loss of network communication. If it's scattered and less than 25%, just random bad luck. It's normal and harmless to randomly get some per cent of not-accepted, and of course randomness can sometimes bunch up and look like a pattern. The idea of an option to View/Hide unaccepted blocks is a good one, as well as View/Hide all generated blocks so you can more easily see incoming transactions. Seeing the unaccepted blocks is just annoying and frustrating. Everyone faces the same rate of unaccepted, it's just a part of the process. It would probably be best to default to hide unaccepted blocks, so as not to show giving and taking away something that never was, and not show new generated blocks at all until they have at least one confirmation. It would only mean finding out you have a generated block 15 minutes later than normal, and then you still have 119 blocks to go before it matures anyway. This is on the to-do list for v0.1.6. Satoshi I'm having an unusual run of failures, and thought I'd let you know in case this was of any significance. Regards, NicholasRe: Generated (not accepted) mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090201-Re_Another crash-127904(75057000.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090201-Re_Another crash-127904(75057000.1).pdf

Subject: Re: Another crash From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com> Date: 01/02/2009, 15:33 To: nbohm@ernest.net I haven't got the file men�oned there, e02_appcompat.txt - it is deleted by sending the error report, which I did before thinking to make a copy. However, I sent you the corresponding file for an earlier crash a�ached to my message of 25th January. No worries, that only tells what program it was. There's another useful dump report, but they keep the file locked so you can't get it. I eventually figured it out from 0x000be368 (fault address). See the first screenshot: the UI is s�ll visible, and doesn't close un�l the error report is sent. I'm not sure whether it's usable, as I hadn't thought to try. It's probably s�ll fully func�onal, in which case you could push the crash message off the screen and ignore it. The thread that crashed already did the main part of its job. You were s�ll fully opera�onal on the network and genera�ng during the �mes you were crashed. I'll let you know of course if I have anything further to report. Thanks. BTW, I sent a transfer to your Bitcoin address in case you're curious what that looks like. (It can only get "from" and comment info if you can receive incoming connec�ons) SatoshiRe: Another crash mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090201-Re_Another crash-127904.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090201-Re_Another crash-127904.pdf

Subject: Re: Another crash From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com> Date: 01/02/2009, 15:33 To: nbohm@ernest.net I haven't got the file men�oned there, e02_appcompat.txt - it is deleted by sending the error report, which I did before thinking to make a copy. However, I sent you the corresponding file for an earlier crash a�ached to my message of 25th January. No worries, that only tells what program it was. There's another useful dump report, but they keep the file locked so you can't get it. I eventually figured it out from 0x000be368 (fault address). See the first screenshot: the UI is s�ll visible, and doesn't close un�l the error report is sent. I'm not sure whether it's usable, as I hadn't thought to try. It's probably s�ll fully func�onal, in which case you could push the crash message off the screen and ignore it. The thread that crashed already did the main part of its job. You were s�ll fully opera�onal on the network and genera�ng during the �mes you were crashed. I'll let you know of course if I have anything further to report. Thanks. BTW, I sent a transfer to your Bitcoin address in case you're curious what that looks like. (It can only get "from" and comment info if you can receive incoming connec�ons) SatoshiRe: Another crash mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Hearsay Statements/COPA's Fifth CEA Notice.pdf

Hearsay Statements

COPA's Fifth CEA Notice.pdf

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND & WALES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIST (ChD) Claim No: IL -2021 -000019 BETWEEN: (1) CRYPTO OPEN PATENT ALLIANCE Claimant -and- (1) DR CRAIG STEVEN WRIGHT Defendant COPA’S FIFTH HEARSAY NOTICE DATED 2 FEBRUARY 2023 PURSUANT TO §2 CIVIL EVIDENCE ACT 1995 AND CPR r.33.2 1. Notice is hereby given that at the trial of this action COPA intends to rely on the account listed below as being a true statement of the understanding of its maker . 2. The Letter of Andreas Furche dated 2 February 2024. As stated in COPA’s Fourth Hearsay Notice, Andreas Furche has indicated that he is unable or unwilling to give evidence at trial due to other commitments. He is an independent third party who has provided confirmation of facts within his own knowledge. He is located overseas in Australia. 3. Should the sections of Dr Wright’s Eleventh Witness Statement to which Professor Furche’s Letter relates be admitted, COPA intends to rely on t he relevant facts and conclusions contained in the document which is clear on its face. I t is neither necessary nor proportionate, having regard to the nature of their evidence and the fact that the author is located in a foreign jurisdiction overseas , to apply for an order from the Court requiring the attendance of that witness at Trial to give evidence or by deposition. 2 FEBRUARY 2024 BIRD & BIRD LLP

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090202-Re_All's well-133273.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090202-Re_All's well-133273.pdf

Subject: Re: All's well From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com> Date: 02/02/2009, 18:15 To: nbohm@ernest.net No further trouble; but whereas the UI at first showed your transfer as: 35 blocks 01/02/2009 16:25 Received with: !Me 1CHE5JRfc5mr8ZtVUP7nnsS5HC4bWcXoc6 +100.00 it now (the morning a�er) shows: 98 blocks 01/02/2009 16:25 Received with: Satoshi Nakamoto 1CHE5JRfc5mr8ZtVUP7nnsS5HC4bWcXoc6 +100.00 Everyone promptly presses "Change..." and labels their own address with my name. I need to figure out some way to convey that it's showing the address you received it with, in just one or two words Maybe: "Receiving address: " "Incoming address: " Or the way e-mail programs do it: "To: " "Recipient: " Which one do you think would work best, or is it just too much to overcome the predisposi�on to expect it to say who it's from no ma�er what it's labelled? This would probably work best: "From: unknown, To: Your Address 1cc...." or "From: anonymous, To: Your Address 1cc...." SatoshiRe: All's well mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090202-Re_All's well-133273(75057003.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090202-Re_All's well-133273(75057003.1).pdf

Subject: Re: All's well From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com> Date: 02/02/2009, 18:15 To: nbohm@ernest.net No further trouble; but whereas the UI at first showed your transfer as: 35 blocks 01/02/2009 16:25 Received with: !Me 1CHE5JRfc5mr8ZtVUP7nnsS5HC4bWcXoc6 +100.00 it now (the morning a�er) shows: 98 blocks 01/02/2009 16:25 Received with: Satoshi Nakamoto 1CHE5JRfc5mr8ZtVUP7nnsS5HC4bWcXoc6 +100.00 Everyone promptly presses "Change..." and labels their own address with my name. I need to figure out some way to convey that it's showing the address you received it with, in just one or two words Maybe: "Receiving address: " "Incoming address: " Or the way e-mail programs do it: "To: " "Recipient: " Which one do you think would work best, or is it just too much to overcome the predisposi�on to expect it to say who it's from no ma�er what it's labelled? This would probably work best: "From: unknown, To: Your Address 1cc...." or "From: anonymous, To: Your Address 1cc...." SatoshiRe: All's well mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Hearsay Statements/COPA's Fourth CEA Notice.pdf

Hearsay Statements

COPA's Fourth CEA Notice.pdf

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND & WALES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIST (ChD) Claim No: IL -2021 -000019 BETWEEN: (1) CRYPTO OPEN PATENT ALLIANCE Claimant -and- (1) DR CRAIG STEVEN WRIGHT Defendant COPA’S FOURTH HEARSAY NOTICE DATED 23 JANUARY 2023 PURSUANT TO §2 CIVIL EVIDENCE ACT 1995 AND CPR r.33.2 1. Notice is hereby given that at the trial of this action COPA intends to rely on the account listed below as being a true statement of the understanding of its maker . 2. The Witness Statement of Andreas Furche dated 1 August 2023 . Andreas Furche has indicated that he is unable or unwilling to give evidence at trial due to other commitments. He is an independent third party who has provided confirmation of facts within his own knowledge. He is located overseas in Australia. The evidence has been taken in a man ner than is compliant with CPR 57AC, and COPA’s solicitors have provided a suitable confirmation of compliance. 3. COPA intends to rely on t he relevant facts and conclusions contained in the document which is clear on its face. I t is neither necessary nor proportionate, having regard to the nature of their evidence and the fact that the author is located in a foreign jurisdiction overseas , to apply for an order from the Court requiring the attendance of that witness at Trial to give evidence or by deposition. 23 JANUARY 2024 BIRD & BIRD LLP

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090130-Re_Resent-104523.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090130-Re_Resent-104523.pdf

Subject: Re: Resent From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 30/01/2009, 22:51 To: nbohm@ernest.net Nicholas Bohm wrote: Satoshi Nakamoto wrote: I resent the 0.1.4 file in the previous e-mail. It also contained a bugfix for a bug that was dormant but I thought by process of elimination might have been what you had, but after you told me about Eraser I think it's more likely to have been Eraser/disk space related. I guess we are simultaneously trying to debug my e-mail. We seem to be, as I can only find two messages from you, the one above and the one from vistomail, and neither has any attachments. (I have also again checked the spam quarantine.) So something odd is happening. Regards, Nicholas Clearly one side or the other is stopping the ones with attachments. I sent you the same file attachment from vistomail about 15 minutes after I sent it from gmx (about 2 hours ago). I've successfully sent similar attachments to other people from vistomail many times before. After this e-mail, which I'm sending without an attachment to make sure it gets through, I'll try again with a different variation: 1) stripped debug info, reduces rar filesize from 7.8MB to 1.6MB. 2) renamed to bc014.rar, in case long filename or periods are the problem. 3) no gdb.exe. After that I'll send bc014a.rar, with bitcoin.exe renamed to bitcoin.dat in case it doesn't like exe files. And then I'll send bc014.rar from vistomail. SatoshiRe: Resent mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090130-Re_Resent-104523(75056992.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090130-Re_Resent-104523(75056992.1).pdf

Subject: Re: Resent From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 30/01/2009, 22:51 To: nbohm@ernest.net Nicholas Bohm wrote: Satoshi Nakamoto wrote: I resent the 0.1.4 file in the previous e-mail. It also contained a bugfix for a bug that was dormant but I thought by process of elimination might have been what you had, but after you told me about Eraser I think it's more likely to have been Eraser/disk space related. I guess we are simultaneously trying to debug my e-mail. We seem to be, as I can only find two messages from you, the one above and the one from vistomail, and neither has any attachments. (I have also again checked the spam quarantine.) So something odd is happening. Regards, Nicholas Clearly one side or the other is stopping the ones with attachments. I sent you the same file attachment from vistomail about 15 minutes after I sent it from gmx (about 2 hours ago). I've successfully sent similar attachments to other people from vistomail many times before. After this e-mail, which I'm sending without an attachment to make sure it gets through, I'll try again with a different variation: 1) stripped debug info, reduces rar filesize from 7.8MB to 1.6MB. 2) renamed to bc014.rar, in case long filename or periods are the problem. 3) no gdb.exe. After that I'll send bc014a.rar, with bitcoin.exe renamed to bitcoin.dat in case it doesn't like exe files. And then I'll send bc014.rar from vistomail. SatoshiRe: Resent mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:09

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Hearsay Statements/Confirmation Letter of Lucas de Groot.pdf

Hearsay Statements

Confirmation Letter of Lucas de Groot.pdf

Lu F nt:; LucasFonts GmbH I Eisenacherst raBe 56 I 10823 Berlin, Germany phone +49 30 78718567 I fax +49 30 78705878 I mail sales@lucasfonts.com Bird & Bird LLP 12 New Fetter Lane London EC4A 1JP Dear Bird & Bird, Luc(as) de Groot LucasFonts.com 14th June 2023 I am a typeface designer and I am also Professor of type design at the University of Applied Sciences in Potsdam, Germany. I am writing to confirm the following facts: 1. I am the designer of Calibri Light. 2. The design work on Calibri Light was done in 2012 and 2013. There was an early shipment in March 2012, with the last update done in March 2013. 3. It was definitely not possible for anyone to use Calibri Light in a Word Document in 2008. By the way, when printed or copied, old documents in Calibri Regular might appear lighter. To prove it is Calibri Light and not Calibri Regular, retype the text with default MS Word settings: Calibri Light will have different line breaks from Regular. I understand you have asked me to confirm these facts for the purpose of legal proceedings in England. I confirm that: This letter sets out only facts of which I have personal knowledge in my own words. I have not been asked or encouraged by anyone to include in this letter anything that is not my own account, to the best of my ability and recollection, of matters of events I witnessed or matters of which I have personal knowledge. I believe the facts stated here are true. With kind regards, Luc(as) de Groot FontFabrik is a trademark of LucasFonts GmbH

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090525-Re_Bitcoin-207675(75057033.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090525-Re_Bitcoin-207675(75057033.1).pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 25/05/2009, 09:14 To: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Satoshi Nakamoto wrote: That's the transaction fee feature. If you generate a block containing a transaction that includes a transaction fee, you earn the transaction fee in addition to the 50.00. Someone must have included a 0.10 fee with one of their transactions. The setting to do that is under options. Including a fee is completely optional, more of a donation to nodes for helping out. Bitcoin continues to run smoothly, but I noticed an unusual event: 731 blocks 11/05/2009 15:58 Generated +50.10 All prior and subsequent generated packers have been of exactly 50. Just in case this is of interest! Regards, Nicholas Thanks for the explanation. I've set a transaction fee of 0.07, just to see how it works out. (I feel I can afford it, as my balance is now over 35,000!) Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFRe: Bitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090525-Re_Bitcoin-207675.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090525-Re_Bitcoin-207675.pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 25/05/2009, 09:14 To: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Satoshi Nakamoto wrote: That's the transaction fee feature. If you generate a block containing a transaction that includes a transaction fee, you earn the transaction fee in addition to the 50.00. Someone must have included a 0.10 fee with one of their transactions. The setting to do that is under options. Including a fee is completely optional, more of a donation to nodes for helping out. Bitcoin continues to run smoothly, but I noticed an unusual event: 731 blocks 11/05/2009 15:58 Generated +50.10 All prior and subsequent generated packers have been of exactly 50. Just in case this is of interest! Regards, Nicholas Thanks for the explanation. I've set a transaction fee of 0.07, just to see how it works out. (I feel I can afford it, as my balance is now over 35,000!) Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFRe: Bitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090211-Re_Bitcoin-169866.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090211-Re_Bitcoin-169866.pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 11/02/2009, 22:19 To: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Satoshi Nakamoto wrote: Nicholas Bohm wrote: I've looked from time to time, and Bitcoin invariably gets exactly 50% of CPU, even when System Idle Process is getting the other 50%. I assumed this was set, and had it in mind to ask you whether the setting could be changed so that Bitcoin could be given its head (e.g. overnight). Do you have a dual core system, such as a Core 2 Duo? Bitcoin currently only launches one process to generate coins but it could easily launch one for each processor. It's probably about time I implemented that. I have a Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq dc5750 Microtower with an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+ 2.19 GHz, 1.87 GB of RAM So it looks as though I could run more processes; and it may be that Bitcoin is getting 100% of half the available CPU. Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFRe: Bitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090211-Re_Bitcoin-169866(75057018.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090211-Re_Bitcoin-169866(75057018.1).pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 11/02/2009, 22:19 To: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Satoshi Nakamoto wrote: Nicholas Bohm wrote: I've looked from time to time, and Bitcoin invariably gets exactly 50% of CPU, even when System Idle Process is getting the other 50%. I assumed this was set, and had it in mind to ask you whether the setting could be changed so that Bitcoin could be given its head (e.g. overnight). Do you have a dual core system, such as a Core 2 Duo? Bitcoin currently only launches one process to generate coins but it could easily launch one for each processor. It's probably about time I implemented that. I have a Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq dc5750 Microtower with an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+ 2.19 GHz, 1.87 GB of RAM So it looks as though I could run more processes; and it may be that Bitcoin is getting 100% of half the available CPU. Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFRe: Bitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090203-Re_All's well-148664(75057009.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090203-Re_All's well-148664(75057009.1).pdf

Subject: Re: All's well From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 03/02/2009, 22:29 To: nbohm@ernest.net Nicholas Bohm wrote: > No, I'm sure that isn't what I did. Do you remember ever entering "!Me" or my name into the program at any time? BTW, did you figure out that you could doubleclick on a transaction to open a details window? No, a nice touch, especially if in due course the details become context-sensitive. I did try right-clicking, to see if that would get me a chance to delete the failed items, which I find mildly irritating. Despite the similarities to an e-mail program, it's not obvious to doubleclick on transactions. There's no critical info in there so it's fine for now. I hadn't thought of the context menu, I'll plan to use that in the future. Perhaps we should try a payment by me to you, if you would let me have an address. I would be interested to see how it works if the payment is not bc50 or a multiple, for example. Sure, it's 1GtkM4wviwohP192tec9g83hd9X5qtbk9j I'll send back +0.01 as a confirmation. It looks just the same with any amount. If you want to see more details of what's going on internally, run it as bitcoin -debug and it'll show a debug print with the transaction details. It basically selects the closest combination of coins to the amount and writes a transaction with the change going back to yourself. I uploaded bc015a.rar with the changes we've been discussing to: http://www.upload.ae/file/14702/bc015a-rar.html I'm going to release 0.1.5 soon. SatoshiRe: All's well mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090203-Re_All's well-148664.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090203-Re_All's well-148664.pdf

Subject: Re: All's well From: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Date: 03/02/2009, 22:29 To: nbohm@ernest.net Nicholas Bohm wrote: > No, I'm sure that isn't what I did. Do you remember ever entering "!Me" or my name into the program at any time? BTW, did you figure out that you could doubleclick on a transaction to open a details window? No, a nice touch, especially if in due course the details become context-sensitive. I did try right-clicking, to see if that would get me a chance to delete the failed items, which I find mildly irritating. Despite the similarities to an e-mail program, it's not obvious to doubleclick on transactions. There's no critical info in there so it's fine for now. I hadn't thought of the context menu, I'll plan to use that in the future. Perhaps we should try a payment by me to you, if you would let me have an address. I would be interested to see how it works if the payment is not bc50 or a multiple, for example. Sure, it's 1GtkM4wviwohP192tec9g83hd9X5qtbk9j I'll send back +0.01 as a confirmation. It looks just the same with any amount. If you want to see more details of what's going on internally, run it as bitcoin -debug and it'll show a debug print with the transaction details. It basically selects the closest combination of coins to the amount and writes a transaction with the change going back to yourself. I uploaded bc015a.rar with the changes we've been discussing to: http://www.upload.ae/file/14702/bc015a-rar.html I'm going to release 0.1.5 soon. SatoshiRe: All's well mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090211-Re_Bitcoin-165922.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090211-Re_Bitcoin-165922.pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 11/02/2009, 17:55 To: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Satoshi Nakamoto wrote: Could be something else is taking CPU. Run Task Manager (taskmgr) and check if bitcoin.exe is getting >90 CPU. If not, see what is. Sometimes a page will have a broken javascript that makes your browser waste most of the CPU. I've looked from time to time, and Bitcoin invariably gets exactly 50% of CPU, even when System Idle Process is getting the other 50%. I assumed this was set, and had it in mind to ask you whether the setting could be changed so that Bitcoin could be given its head (e.g. overnight). If it already went back to normal, could be a fluke. Randomness bunches up sometimes. Yes, one mustn't read too much into it. There were 11 packets of 50 on the 8th, 8 on the 9th, 2 on the 10th and 4 down to 18.00 today. 2 seems quite a long way out of line, but it's still the short run, no doubt. Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFRe: Bitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090211-Re_Bitcoin-165922(75057016.1).pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090211-Re_Bitcoin-165922(75057016.1).pdf

Subject: Re: Bitcoin From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> Date: 11/02/2009, 17:55 To: Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com> Satoshi Nakamoto wrote: Could be something else is taking CPU. Run Task Manager (taskmgr) and check if bitcoin.exe is getting >90 CPU. If not, see what is. Sometimes a page will have a broken javascript that makes your browser waste most of the CPU. I've looked from time to time, and Bitcoin invariably gets exactly 50% of CPU, even when System Idle Process is getting the other 50%. I assumed this was set, and had it in mind to ask you whether the setting could be changed so that Bitcoin could be given its head (e.g. overnight). If it already went back to normal, could be a fluke. Randomness bunches up sometimes. Yes, one mustn't read too much into it. There were 11 packets of 50 on the 8th, 8 on the 9th, 2 on the 10th and 4 down to 18.00 today. 2 seems quite a long way out of line, but it's still the short run, no doubt. Nicholas -- Salkyns, Great Canfield, Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK Phone 01279 870285 (+44 1279 870285) Mobile 07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728) PGP public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint: 5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FFRe: Bitcoin mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10

/content/Copa v Wright - Trial Documents/Witness Statements/Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit/20090204-[bitcoin-list] Bitcoin v0.1.5 released-156618.pdf

Nicholas Bohm Witness Statement - Exhibit

20090204-[bitcoin-list] Bitcoin v0.1.5 released-156618.pdf

Subject: [bitcoin-list] Bitcoin v0.1.5 released From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com> Date: 04/02/2009, 19:36 To: bitcoin-list@lists.sourceforge.net Version 0.1.5 is now available. It includes the fix for the problem Nicholas had, checking for disk full and changes to try to improve things that were confusing. Special thanks to Nicholas and Dustin for all their help and feedback! Download link: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=244765&package_id=298441 Changes: - disk full warning - fixed a bug that could occur if dns lookup failed - prevent entering your own address in the address book, which confusingly changed the label for your own address - moved change address button to menu under options - tweaks to make it get connected faster - close sockets on exit - created minimum fee for transactions less than 1 cent - hid the transaction-type selection box that only had one choice - cleaned up ParseMoney a little - slightly cleaner reformatting of message text - changed the font in transaction details dialog - added some explanation text to transaction details for generated coins - reworded the description for transactions received with bitcoin address Satoshi Nakamoto http://www.bitcoin.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM) software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power of local resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and Ajax docs to start building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com _______________________________________________ bitcoin-list mailing list bitcoin-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-list[bitcoin-list] Bitcoin v0.1.5 released mailbox:///Q:/Admin/Mail/Profiles/erj82dii.default/Mail/... 1 of 1 21/07/2023, 17:10