Datasets:

Shubh8434

/

All_1

like 0

council_100520_2022075V

The October 5th, 2020 meeting of the Seattle City Council will come to order. It is 2:01 p.m.. I'm Lorraine Gonzalez, president of the council. Will the clerk please call the roll? Council member macheda as a. Council member. Peter, same. Here. Council members want. Councilmember Strauss. Present. Councilmember Herbold. Councilmember Juarez. Council member, Lewis. President. Councilmember Morales. Your Council President Gonzalez. Here six present. And I would just like to note that Councilmember Sawant also appears to have joined us. So we have seven present. Thank you. Great OC. Thank you so much. Presentations. I'm not aware of any presentations today. Council members just like I did this morning at council briefing for full council, I am going to suspend the rules to continue to allow remote participation consistent with the Governor's proclamation. So the City Council rules are silent on allowing remote meetings and electronic participation at city council and committee meetings. The City Council anticipates continuing this practice through at least November 9th of 2020 to allow the Council to conduct business remotely. The Council rules will need to be suspended. If there is no objection. The Council rules will be suspended to allow council members to hold remote meetings and to participate electronically at city council and committee meetings through November 9th of 2020. Hearing no objection, the council rules are suspended and the Council will hold remote meetings and participate electronically through November 9th of 2020. The minutes of the special City Council meeting of September 29, 2020 have been reviewed. If there is no objection, the minutes will be signed. Hearing. Objection. The minutes are being signed. Will the clerk please affix my signature to the minutes? Adoption of the referral calendar. If there is no objection, the introduction and referral calendar will be adopted. Hearing. No objection. The introduction and referral calendar is adopted. Approval of the agenda. If there is no objection, the agenda will be adopted. Hearing no objection. The agenda is adopted. Public comment. Colleagues, at this time we will open the remote public comment period for items on the City Council Agenda, Introduction, Referral Calendar and the Council's 2020 program. I thank everyone for their ongoing patience and cooperation as we continue to operate this remote public comment system. It remains the strong intent of the City Council to have remote public comment regularly included on meeting agendas. However, as a reminder, the City Council reserves the right to end or eliminate these public comment periods at any point. If we deem that the that this system is being abused or is no longer suitable for allowing our meetings to be conducted efficiently and effectively. I will moderate the public comment period in the following manner. The public comment period for this meeting is 20 minutes, and each speaker will be given 2 minutes to speak. I will call on each speaker by name and in the order in which they are registered on the council's website. If you've not yet registered to speak, but would like to, you can sign up before the end of public comment by going to the Council's website at Seattle that Govee Forward Slash Council. KUNC Will the public comment link is also listed on today's published agenda? Once I call on a speaker, a staff will unmute the appropriate microphone, and an automatic prompt of you have been unmuted will be the speaker's cue that it is their turn at to press star six and then begin speaking again. Once the speaker hears you have been unmuted, you must press Star six and then begin speaking. Please begin speaking by stating your name and the item that you are addressing. And as a reminder, public comment should relate to an item on today's agenda the introduction and Referral Calendar or the Council's 2020 work program. At about 10 seconds, speakers are going to hear a chime. That means that you will only that you only have 10 seconds left out of the 2 minutes that you are being allotted today. Once you hear that chime, please begin to wrap up your public comment. If speakers do not end their public their comments at the end of the allotted time, provided the speaker's microphone will be neutered to allow us to call on the next speaker. Once you've completed your public comment, we ask that you please disconnect from the line. And if you plan to continue following this meeting, please do so via Seattle Channel or any one of the listing options listed on the agenda. Okay. So again, as a reminder, public comment should relate to an item on today's agenda. The introduction and referral calendar or the Council's 2020 work program. So I will now open up the public comment period. It's 2:06 p.m., so we'll go until 2:26 p.m.. And again, as a reminder to each of the commenters, you must hit Star six in order for us to hear you. The first speaker is Mary Delaney, followed by Leah Missick. Hello. Hello. I am Mary Delaney, District three, and I am calling to say that if y'all do not properly defund CPD by at least 50%, y'all are all cowards. In that case, bless your hearts. I yield my time. Next up is Leah Missick, followed by Meghan Cruz. Good afternoon. My name is Leah Mistaken. I'm the Washington transportation policy manager at Climate Solutions. We are in strong support of Seattle City Lights, Transportation, electrification, strategic investment plan and the ordinance that would grant City Light Authority to offer transportation electrification incentive programs. We are excited that these items unanimously passed out of committee and I would like to see the same at full council this afternoon. The transportation sector is responsible for the largest share of Seattle's greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution. As the Washington Environmental Health Disparities Map show so clearly shows, this pollution is also not felt equally. It is urgent both for the climate and for our health, that we power our transit, freight and other vehicles with city lights 100% clean electricity without utility support, we will not be able to rapidly electrify at the rate that's necessary to meet Seattle's climate goals. So please grant city like this authority to do this work so we can legally move forward with developing a more detailed implementation plan, including program development based on extensive community outreach, particularly with environmental justice communities. Any and all vehicles on the road needs to be clean, and this is a step in that direction. It is also a benefit to all city customers, since it will put downward pressure on rates, not to mention the positive health impacts from reduce pollution. We really cannot delay climate action any longer. The more time we take to cut emissions, the harder it will be to do what must be done. Thank you for the opportunity to comment today and I urge your support. Thanks. Thank you for calling in. Next up is Megan Cruz, followed by Karen Gillan. Hello, I'm Meghan Cruz speaking on CB 119877 emergency legislation that has strayed from its original mission. First, I would like to say I strongly support extending virtual design review meetings during COVID. CCI reports the virtual system has been a success and running since August and has been well received. For these reasons, I ask the Council to reject the bills to provisions that undercut virtual meetings by allowing developments that elected a temporary internal review to remain out of the public eye through the end of the year. This involves dozens of large market rate projects that posted public notices telling neighbors it was temporary and the project would return to virtual design review meetings as soon as they were available. In addition, without explanation, the bill's sponsor has dropped an amendment to reduce the length of this bill, meaning without reason, it will last for a half a year beyond the end of the emergency declaration. Special interest loophole and the extended timeline have turned this emergency bill into an effort to change design review policy, something the Council rejected as not their original intent. Before passing this bill, please. Number one limit extending its provisions to three months and to require CCI provides a list of additional projects that would now be allowed to remain in ADR along with the reason and require each of these to re-issue a public notice to neighbors council members. Your constituents rely on you to balance the influence of special interests. Please stand by your original pledge. Don't use COVID as a reason to deny neighbors and local design review boards a public voice. Thank you. Thank you for calling in. Next up is Karen, followed by Diane Glover. Hello. My name is Karen Gillan, and I'm a downtown Seattle resident. I'm speaking in regards to CD 119877. This will allow almost four. Doesn't market rate development projects to continue an administrative design review well beyond the end of the mayor's COVID emergency order. Since this temporary provision was put in place, virtual meeting capacity is expanded and is able to handle these projects. This is no longer need to be excluded from participation in assessing development plans, which will affect the livability of our city for years to come. Unlike developers, I cannot afford to make large contributions to your reelection campaigns. All I can do is urge you to remember that you were elected to serve the best interests of the people of Seattle. Shutting us out of the design review process makes me wonder where your allegiance lies. Please do not pass this bill. Thank you. Next up is Diane, followed by Annabel Drayton. My name is Diane Glover. I'm a pediatric infectious disease doctor. And today I'm representing the Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility. We are a group of health professionals advocating for policies that protect our health and climate. Thank you for the opportunity to comment in strong support of Resolution 31971 and CB 119895. We are excited that our Seattle City Light is pursuing a transportation electrification plan. The transportation sector, as you know, is responsible for the largest share of Seattle's greenhouse gas emissions and toxic air pollution. Lower income communities and communities of color bear the brunt of this pollution. For example, diesel particulate pollution contribute to a reduction in life expectancy by 13 years for those folks living excuse me, in the Duwamish Valley as compared to other cleaner parts of the city. It is urgent that we instead power our transit, freight and other vehicles with 100% clean electors electricity rather than fossil fuels. A new study released by the American Lung Association found that Seattle could save $1 billion in health costs through a transition to electric vehicles. As a pediatric infectious disease specialist, I care for very vulnerable, sick, premature babies, many with chronic lung disease due to their prematurity. These babies are extremely vulnerable to toxic air pollution with risk of asthma, pneumonia, respiratory failure and need for hospitalization. I also care for kids with asthma, recurrent pneumonia and immunologic problems. Please help my patients and our community have a better chance of thriving in a cleaner, safer air quality environment. Thank you. Thank you for calling in. Next up is Annabel Drayton, followed by Megan Lynn. Good afternoon. My name is Annabel Drayton, and I'm a policy associate at the Northwest Energy Coalition, an alliance of over 100 member organizations united around clean and affordable energy. My work focuses on the intersection of the transportation and utility sectors, and I've worked with eight Northwest utilities at various levels on the design of their tea or transportation , electrification plans and programs. I'm here in support of the Transportation Electrification Strategic Investment Plan, and I urge you to adopt Resolution 31971 and to pass Council Bill 11 9095. Electric utilities have an obligation to reliably, efficiently and affordably serve their customers. And as electric vehicle adoption of all vehicle classes continues to accelerate, it is imperative that Seattle City take proactive steps to support the efficient integration of this new load. Proactive planning is that is imperative to ensure direct and indirect benefits accrue to our customers, especially for our front line communities and low income households who are disproportionately impacted by air pollution and higher transportation energy burdens. The SIP, as it's been called, its priority priority investment areas where developing meaningful input from stakeholders and community members and aligning with community needs. It includes several commitments by Seattle City Light, including to continue inclusive collaboration to integrate demand side management component into new program offerings to avoid or reduce the need for transmission and distribution system upgrades. It is essential to support greater access to affordable energy for Seattle City customers and to continue shaping metrics that are participatory process that will help evaluate equitable access to TV and more. These are essential components of planning and will help guide Seattle City like program design and implementation in collaboration with stakeholders. Environmental Justice, Community. We thank you and your support. Thank you for calling in. Next up is Megan, followed by Rachel from Beau. And Megan, make sure you hit Star six so we can hear you. Hi. My name is Megan Lynn. I'm an attorney with Perkins Coie. This comment pertains to resolution 319732. Set a time and place for the Waterfront Lyd hearings. Our firm represents property owners whose timely filed appeals in 30 cases. We previously requested a pre-hearing conference the better organized ours. I'm sorry, Megan, can you please can you please hold here, please? Just a just a moment. Madam Clerk, I understand that this particular resolution and I'm hoping that Councilmember Juarez is with us as well. Can you please advise on whether we can accept public comment on resolution 31973, understanding that it's a quasi judicial matter? Council. President Gonzalez, this is Amelia Santos. At this point, I'm unable to provide that guidance. But let me double check rather quickly, if you wouldn't mind skipping to the next caller, and I would hopefully have a response by the great Megan. I want to thank you for calling in. I just want to just want to make sure that we're minding our P's and Q's here. And so I'm going to put you on hold for just a little bit longer. I don't think it's going to be that long. And then we will circle back and have an answer from the clerk about that procedural question. I appreciate your patience. We want to make sure that we don't inadvertently create issues here. So I'm going to go ahead and ask it to meet your line again. And we're going to go to the next two speakers, which is Rachel from Bao, and then Alicia Ruiz. Hi. My name is Rachel Ramos, and I'm the acting director of Climate and Energy Initiatives in the office of King County Executive Dow Constantine. I'm speaking sport. City Lights, Transportation. Electrification, Strategic Investment Plan. CB 119895. The transportation sector produces the highest amount of carbon emissions in King County. It is time to urgently address the transportation sector to reduce tailpipe emissions and benefit from clean sources of electricity. We recently transmitted King County's 2020 Strategic Climate Action Plan to the King County Council. Vehicle electrification is a key strategy to reaching our share of county wide emission reduction targets of 50% by 2030. Investment in this plan supports this goal. The electrification of our transit fleet is also a key component of our plan, and City has partnered with King County Metro on the development of a South Face test facility where the first 40 long range battery electric busses will charge City Light has provided valuable input and guidance on design timelines , technical solutions for rates and load management that promote low cost, low impact solutions. Climate justice is a priority for King County as it is for Seattle, and we support the plan's focus on addressing environmental inequities endured by near road communities and seek to work in partnership with City Light and frontline communities on equitable solutions. King County supports the Transportation Electrification Strategic Investment Plan, and we look forward to collaborating. I thank you for the opportunity to testify today. Thank you so much for calling in. Next up is Alicia Ruiz. Good afternoon. My name is Alisha Ruiz. I'm the Seattle government affairs manager for the Master Builders Association of King and Sonoma County. And I'm confident in strong support of Council Bill 119877. The extension bill. Master Builders and our nearly 300 members, like I said, are in strong support of this. And in the words of one of our members as CCI, the Mayor and Council did an amazing job initiating the original change so quickly in response to COVID 19. Unfortunately, COVID is still a threat to our collective health and our economy. The council's decision made since then and extending it makes sense now. If we want more housing in areas where we've planned for it, we need to extend the Administrative Design Review Ordinance. Thank you very much. Thank you for calling in. Madam Clerk, do you have an answer for me on the issue related to resolution 31973? Yes, President Obama and the Republicans may speak on the actual process itself for setting the public hearing date, and it may not speak to the merits of the actual appeals on the assessments or talk about anyone's final assessment or being agreement or disagreement with those assessments. Great. Thank you so much. Okay. If we can get Meghan Lin back on the line. I see her tile here. There we go. Megan, did you have an opportunity to hear the remarks from our city clerk regarding public comment on this resolution? Did and I will not be addressing the merits. Awesome. Thank you so much, Megan, for your patience. I really appreciate it. Go ahead. Okay. So you're turning up for QE in this comment pertains to resolution 31973 set a time and place for the waterfront lyd hearings. Our firm represents property owners who timely filed appeals in 30 days, and we previously requested a pre-hearing conference to better organize hours and other appeals and to clarify the process for city council. We believe the scheduled times and the resolution December 1st in January could be used in part for this purpose. For this purpose. This resolution currently provides approximately 5 minutes per appeal. That's not enough to fairly present each appeal in light of the requirement that each case is subject to a separate appeal, the city council objectors request a briefing schedule and a separate hearing for each of our cases in some reasonable amount of time. For example, 30 minutes for argument. Extraordinary, extraordinary circumstances exist here which allow for this. Our appeals consist of thousands of pages of testimony or 14 days of hearings. There's no metered, indexed record yet prepared. We also believe a pre-hearing conference can make the process more efficient, for example, by hearing appeals for related properties together like the Four Seasons Hotel, which comprises of three parcels that should be heard on the same day. The harbor steps for apartment towers should also be considered together and probably more efficiently. Group all the Hyatt properties together. All of the remanded properties together. And all the condo condos in a particular building together. Finally, we request an opportunity to opportunity to supplement the record. We closed our cases in April six months ago, and a lot has happened since then. COVID 19, the Pier 58 closure, the ongoing protests in downtown, and these events impact property valuation and anticipated special benefits from the improvement. So we request the opportunity to describe the relevance of those changes to our appeals. That is. All right. Thank you so much for calling in today. That is the last speaker we have that is pre-registered for public comment today. So we're going to go ahead and close out the period of public comment and move to items of business on our agenda. First item of business is payment of the bills. Will the please read the title? Capital 119904 Appropriating money to pay claims to the September 21st, 2023, September 25th, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof. Thank you. I move to pass Council Bill 119904. Is there a second? Second. It's been moved and seconded that the bill passed. Are there any comments? Hearing no comments. Will the clerk please call the roll on the passage of the bill? Macheda. Mosquera. Peterson. All right. So what? Yes. Strauss. Yes. Suarez. Herbold. Yes. Lewis. Yes. Morales as. President Gonzalez Yes. Seven in favor, none opposed. Thank you, Madam Clerk. The bill passes and the chair will sign it. Will the Court please affix my signature to the legislation on my behalf? Item one Will the clerk please read item one into the. Third part of the City Council agenda? Item one Constable 11998119884 Photo Parking Area Modifying the 2021 assessment by update and amending ordinance 125 678. Thank you. I moved past Council Bill 119884. Is there a second. I can open? It's been moved and seconded to pass the bill. Councilman Morales, you are listed as the prime sponsor of the bill and are recognized in order to address this item. Thank you, colleagues. As I mentioned a couple. Of weeks ago is a. Display of assessment. For the central. Bank. I want to clarify. That this bill did. Not require. A public hearing. And because we're not. Actually voting on a rate change. This would delay the assessment date update, which means that the assessment would remain the same for the last two years. And the Ratepayer Advisory Board agreed that because of the economic impact of COVID 19. Of rate payers would. Benefit from holding steady. And so. In 2022. They would. That is when they would make. The changes. To the. Assessment rate. There are questions I'm happy to take them, but it's a fairly small change. And. That mentioned before the rate payers have been advised and a letter went out to. Them a few weeks ago. I think it counts and everyone else. Are there any additional comments on the bill? Hearing no additional comments on the bill. Will the please call the role on the passage of the bill? Let's get a. I. Peterson I. So want. Yes. Strauss. Yes. Her? Yes. Lewis. Yes. Morales. Yes. President Gonzalez. Yes. Eight in favor. None opposed. The bill passes and the chair will sign it. Will the clerk please affix my signature to the legislation? Item two. Will the clerk please read item two into the record? That jumped out of two counts above 119902 related to the city department section 21.40 9.0. And I'm supposed to clarify the department's discretion to allow additional services on a parcel as it deems necessary to provide adequate service to customers. Thank you, Madam Clerk. I moved the past council bill 119902. Is there a second? Second? Thank you. It's been moved and seconded to pass the bill. Councilmember Peterson, you are the prime sponsor of the bill and are recognized in order to address this item. Thank you. Council President Seattle City Light, one of the two utility enterprises we are fortunate to own and operate, has five items on today's agenda. These items were reviewed during the extra meeting we had at the Transportation Utilities Committee on September 25. We were able to vote on four of those five items which our committee recommended unanimously, and we as the entire city council will vote on those items later today. In addition, our committee received a briefing on this fifth item, which is before us today as Council Bill 119902. The theme of all of this legislation before us today is electrification electrification to benefit our environment. As we know, Seattle City Light provides clean hydroelectric power, so the more we can get people to use it instead of other forms of energy, the better. This council bill 11902 excuse me, 119902 Updates The City of Seattle, one site, one service policy so that charging stations and infrastructure for electric vehicles can be more easily installed even after a property already has electrical service. We want to make it easier for people to use zero emission vehicles and this legislation helps with that. Thank you. Thank you. Councilmember Peterson, are there any additional comments on the bill? Councilmember Herbold, please. Thank you. I just want to thank some of the District one constituents. Who brought this issue to my attention a number of months ago. The the residents of the Puget Ridge Cooperative, which is a a multi it's a single property with multi residents on it. They were seeking to add charging. Stations because it's a. It's an area that's home to many, many families across a number of different pieces of property that have been pulled together for the purposes. Of this cooperative. And at the time, Seattle City Light was kind of. Working on doing a. Sort of a workaround to try to help them, but recognize that it was really important that we needed to update the policies in order to, you know, in light that there are many, many more people who are driving electric cars. So just a shout out to the D one residents who brought this issue to my attention. I'm not suggesting a product to stay on. City lights attention. I'm sure they are. They already were well aware of the issue but really appreciate their work with the community and in. Helping on the. Workaround while we are considering this new policy. Thank you, councilmember her votes, are there any additional comments on the bill? Right. Hearing a nun. And I'm not saying I remember Peterson raised his hand again. So I'll go ahead and take that as a cue that we are ready to close out debate and vote. So will the clerk please call the roll on the passage of the bill? Let's get our eye Peterson. By. The lines. Yes, Strauss. I. Herbold, I. Lewis Yes. Morales Yes. President Gonzalez, high eight in favor and unopposed. Thank you, Madam Clerk. The bill passes and the chair will sign it. Will the clerk please affixed my signature to the legislation? Item three Will the clerk please read item three into the record? Agenda Item three Council Bill 119903 relating to city employment, commonly referred to as the third quarter 2020 employment ordinance, returning positions to the Civil Service System and establishing a new title and corresponding rate of pay all by a two thirds vote of the City Council. Thank you, Madam Clerk. I will move to pass Council Bill 119903. Is there a second? Second. Thank you so much. It's been moved and seconded to pass the bill as sponsor of the bill. I will go ahead and address it and then open up the Florida. Any comments or questions? Colleagues, as I mentioned this morning, this legislation does two things. First, it returns eight positions to the civil service system. And second, it creates a new job title in the Legislative Department. Central staff has not identified any issues or concerns with the transmitted legislation. With regard to the eight positions, SAIL Department Human Resources Director Bobby Hughes has determined that the work performed by these eight positions no longer meet the criteria for civil service exemption, and he recommends returning the positions to civil service. The October 2nd memo, drafted by central staff analyst Carina Bull, provides a table of the list of these positions. By way of summary, these positions are in various departments, including the Office of Planning and Community Development, Seattle Office for Civil Rights, Department of Education and Early Learning Finance and Administrative Services. Office of Arts and Culture. Seattle Department of Transportation and the Community Police Commission. Of the eight positions, only two positions at Ascot and one position at PCD are currently filled. The remaining positions are vacant. The impact of these positions is that they are returned to the civil service system, which means that the employees in these positions now or in the future will be afforded a range of additional job protections, including merit based hiring and promotions, probationary periods of employment, opportunity to correct performance issues and for cause termination rather than at will employment. The additional rules related to this reclassification are detailed in Ms.. Bowles October 2nd memorandum. The second component of this bill relates to the Legislative Department. This legislation also accepts our Director Hume's recommendation to create a new job title of manager legislative. This new job title would delineate responsibilities among professional and managerial staff that currently have the same title of strategic advisor and creates an opportunity for career progression and succession planning within the Council Central Staff Division. In conclusion, this legislation is cost neutral. The executive has indicated that returning these positions to the civil service system would not increase costs because the designated positions would remain at the same pay rate after the proposed change. In other words, this legislation changes the job protections for these positions, but does not modify the existing ranges of available pay for the for the eight positions I've described with regard to the new job title in the Legislative Department, the pay ban for that position is parallel to that of a strategic advisor in the Legislative Department. This legislation does not modify the pay band available for this job title creation. Any additional costs for this job title can and will be absorbed by the Legislative Department's existing budget authority and would not require a new appropriation of funds moving forward. I'm happy to hear any additional comments or take any questions on the bill. Hearing. No additional comments will work. Please. Kolawole on the passage of the bill. Oscar I. PETERSON Hi. Sergeant. Yes. Strauss Yes. Purple? Yes. LEWIS Yes. MORALES That's. President Gonzalez s eight in favor and unopposed. Thank you. The bill passes and the chair will sign it. Will the clerk please affix my signature to the legislation? All right. Report of land use to neighborhoods committee item four. Will the clerk please read item four into the record? Three report at the L.A. Sun has committed to and four counts about 119877 have waited so long due to a few decision and meeting procedures, temporarily modifying suspensions, procedures and titles 23 and 25% on this proposal. The committee recommends that the bill passes amended with a desire to report with the staff together. And we were in favor and Counselor Peterson opposed. Thank you, Madam Clerk. Councilmember Strauss, you are the chair of the committee and are recognized in order to provide the report of the committee. Thank you. Council president and colleagues. This legislation extends provisions that allow for virtual design review and landmarks board meetings to continue until the end of the COVID 19 emergency. You will recall that in April we adopted emergency legislation in response to the COVID 19 emergency, which allowed projects that would originally ordinarily go to design review boards to instead be considered through administrative design review, which is conducted by STC staff. When we passed that legislation, council made clear that we expected SDC and Department of Neighborhoods to start virtual design meetings of the design, review and Landmarks boards as soon as possible. SDI and Department of Neighborhoods both worked hard to move these very technical, complex meetings to a virtual format, which included the need for additional staff. These meetings are now up and running and are going well. This legislation allows for those virtual meetings to continue for the duration of the COVID 19 emergency and automatically sunsets two months after the emergency ends to allow time to ramp up in-person meetings again as the original emergency legislation required. New projects, except for affordable housing projects, are now going through full design review board processes again because virtual meetings have begun. This legislation does not propose to change that. The legislation does allow for a limited number of projects that already started in the administrative design review process to stay in the administrative design review process through the end of this year. Specifically projects that state that can stay in administrative zone review through December if the project has completed the early design guidance process, or if STSCI cannot provide a virtual meeting before the ordinance takes effect of the 67 total projects that opted into administrative design review through the emergency ordinance. There are currently just 15 who qualify to remain in the Administrative Design Review through the end of this year. Administrative Design Review still includes opportunity for public input akin to full design review, even though it is not a full design review meeting. As I mentioned at council briefing this morning, I did consider whether to bring an amendment that would have shortened this timeline of this legislation to six months from now for us to be able to consider modifications to be made or aspects of the bill that are working well and should be made permanent. I'm not bringing that amendment forward this afternoon because it is better policy to simply extend these temporary provisions for the duration of the emergency. Rather, we will do the work between now and then to understand which of these changes are working well or not. So that at the end of the COVID emergency, we are ready to make the needed changes for the new environment in which we will live in. As well, we retain the opportunity to make permanent or make modification before the COVID emergency is over. On a separate track as to not conflate this emergency and temporary these emergency and temporary changes from the permanent or ongoing changes that are needed. Finally, I've heard from some residents who shared their concerns about this legislation and some of whom we heard a public comment today. My staff or I have met with Megan Cruz repeatedly and in the recent weeks, and we appreciate those conversations because it enabled us to understand her concerns more indefinitely. And we even brought an amendment with Councilmember Lewis to shorten the original duration of this legislation directly in response to the issues that she raised. It was originally proposed to be six months. The extension of this legislation would be in effect six months past the end of the COVID civil emergency, and we have reduced that duration to two months past the COVID emergency. I've heard from central staff that it takes about three months for us due to public hearing requirements and other land use code requirements for us to make the needed changes. And so that is why we will get working before the COVID emergency is over, so that when the COVID emergency, the civil emergencies is ended, we will be ready to take the next step. This policy does not allow new projects to bypass design review. It still ensures that the design review process can continue smoothly and safely during these extraordinary times. This bill is an extension of the bill passed in April, and I urge your support. Thank you, colleagues. Thank you. Council President. Thank you, Councilmember Strauss, for that committee report. Are there any additional comments on the bill? Councilman Mosqueda, please. Thank you very much. Council Member Strauss I just want to say thank you for your leadership again supporting us through this process. I think it's really important. I am very excited to vote for this. I understand it's a small but important measure and I don't want to oversell its its impact or its significance because it's really more and more process in nature, making sure that the functions of core government can continue during this crisis. But I wasn't planning to speak, but I do think it's important to just sort of clarify for the record. There is nothing that this council is doing that is trying to use COVID as an excuse to change policy. In fact, what we are doing is being responsible stewards of the public's health by making sure that processes can continue and to do so in a way that protects the very vulnerable in our community. And frankly, all of us, as we know that COVID has no bounds. It will infect people whether they are young or old. It just happens to be those who are elderly and those with underlying health conditions that are more susceptible to death. So while we continue to see increases in the number of COVID cases in our city, in our region, we also take pride, as the Seattle Times has noted just today, that Seattle is among the largest cities that has this slower, slowest rate of infection among its population. We have taken it very important measures led by public health data that is intended to both slow transmission and also keep our population healthy. As we think about who are the individuals who would more likely be in a situation to become exposed, it would be those who are sitting inside a closed door room for long periods of time and somewhat stuffy meetings in the past. Making the opportunity for folks to participate electronically is the right thing to do for public health. And it also recognizes that when we force people to go back to in-person meetings sooner than they should be, we will effectively be screening out those who have underlying health conditions and those who may be elderly because they are not going to be able to participate in an in-person room. This is a smart thing for us to do. It is sound public health policy that we are following and it allows for our city to continue to govern in a thoughtful way that is cognizant of the public health advice in front of us. So I do take issue with any sort of accusation that this is being done for any other policy rationale other than trying to protect the public's health and make sure that the city government core functions can continue. This is why Seattle is leading the nation in strong public health policies and helping to slow the spread of transmission . We cannot continue to keep up those good statistics that were just reported by the Seattle Times. If we rush to reopen or try to get back to normal, there is no getting back to normal. So I appreciate the council member, Councilmember Strauss, as the sponsor of this legislation, recognizing that we will have to continually update our policies and practices and we have built in time to do so. But we must must center on policy both on public health and also protecting the most vulnerable in our city. And that's what this policy does. Again, it's a small procedural change to make sure that we can continue to move forward. But I really thought it needed to speak up and correct the record on the issue. Councilmember skater Councilmember Lewis, please. Thank you, Madam Chair. And you know, I just want to take a moment to thank Councilmember Strauss for navigating an issue that's been very difficult and that none of us anticipated was going to come up in 2020 in really changing the paradigm of how we do this essential process of community involvement and that there can be continuity with the assistance of technology to make it happen and that we can stand up on a system like this. And I appreciate the opportunity to collaborate with Councilmember Strauss on a couple of changes that Councilmember Strauss made in his introductory remarks on the bill regarding the timeline post-COVID that I know are important to a lot of constituents in District seven and appreciate that that was I incorporated in committee. I know that there's been a lot of concern in the community on both sides with this legislation since the spring as an opportunity to sort of litigate the merits of design review and try to fight that battle in the context of this. Basically, emergency legislation certainly was in the spring. Now is is more of a normal ordinance but still reflecting an emergency situation. And I would just say that, you know, I'm sure that's a conversation and a discussion that will come in its time. But, you know, we need to just make sure that the essential functions of government can continue in times of crisis. And. That may be adapted to reflect the public health situation. And as councilmember skater said, make sure that we are giving everyone the space to participate in these processes in a safe way. So I do just want to say, you know, it really is due to the nature of the emergency. I don't think anyone on this council is thrilled that a lot of the work in the city has to be done remotely right now. But to to protect those that we love and those who are vulnerable in the community, this is really an essential thing to do. And I also want to thank Stsci for for being able to stand up a pretty impressive system to be able to do this. As Councilmember Strauss stressed in his opening comments. The the ADR Administrative Design Review for for market rate projects is only going to affect 15 projects that have essentially already vested that right in the summer, in late spring, and that will expire at the end of the year. So going into 2021, we should be on a on an all virtual footing for these projects except for those projects that otherwise have exemption. So look forward to voting for this legislation today. No one is excited that a lot of these processes that typically involve in-person outreach have to be put on a virtual footing. But it really is in the best interest of best practices and public health. And to do it this way and I and again, just appreciate Stsci and Councilmember Strauss's leadership in navigating a very complicated situation and doing it doing it quite well. So I appreciate it. Thank you. Thank you, Councilmember Lewis, are there any additional comments on the bill? Councilmember Peterson, then Councilmember Herbold. You Council president. And thanks to I want to kudos to Chair Strauss for also navigating this and the amendment to shorten the time frame on this. The legislation seems to do a couple of different things. I definitely appreciate the rationale for continuing to exempt certain affordable housing projects from both design review and administrative design review. Most affordable housing projects receive city money and are required to do a separate community engagement process anyway. So for me, it's really just about if we can maximize public input, community engagement, I'm in favor of that and I'm glad that CCI has stood up the virtual design review process. My my concern is this bill. Would those 15 projects would get to keep the administrative design review benefit for themselves. They're all for profit market rate projects. And I just think that they should have to go back to the regular design reviews since they can do it virtually safely online and provide additional input. So consistent with my committee vote, I'll be voting no on this legislation. Thank you. Thank you, Councilmember Peterson, because Herbert. Thank you. I just want to speak. A little bit to. Some of the issues that have been raised about the. Question of whether or not the council. Is sort of using the state of emergency to make changes to important policies and procedures for. Public. Input. And given that I voted against this legislation back in, I believe it was April, I want to just clarify for the record that the reason I did so in April was because we had a we were operating under. A different set of rules. And of course, there were there was different. Interpretations of those rules under. The types of legislation that we were permitted to be acting on. It seems like ancient history now, but we weren't. We were limited. To taking. Action on emergency legislation under the governor and the the AG. And I felt at the time that a portion of this ordinance did not fit into that rubric. That is not the case any longer. And so for that reason, I feel comfortable voting in support of this legislation. Thank you. Thank you. Councilmember Verbal. Thanks for reminding us of that legislative history. It was only in April, but you're right, it does feel like it was about a million years ago already. And that's an excellent point, that the proclamation that limits or provides exemptions related to the Open Public Meetings Act is been pretty drastically modified to allow us to consider things that are not just strictly related to COVID anymore. So I appreciate the reminder around that particular perspective. Any other comments on the bill? Members trust. You have the last word as it appears that no one else is interested in making any comments. So please take us home on this. Thank you. Council President and colleagues, just to also echo the words of Council Member Herbold and Mosqueda regarding this is not a way to use the Cogat emergency to make permanent changes to legislation. There have been a number of aspects of this legislation that have been received very well in community. Virtual Design Review is one of them, and one of the things that I wanted to begin looking at is if we could make a combination of in-person and virtual design review because of requirements that in-person design review meetings occur in a new community and near the projects that they are reviewing. It does make it difficult to cohabitate virtual and in-person design review meetings because a lot of the rooms that in-person design review meetings are held in are not a set up for the technology that we need to use for virtual design review. And so, again, separating permanent changes from this temporary from this extension of emergency and temporary changes demonstrates that we are not slipping anything through or using this emergency as a cover. Rather, we are making important process changes that protect public health and continue the direction that we are heading with the number of COVID cases that we have in our community. So I look forward to reviewing this, the positives and the drawbacks that this emergency in this legislation has created in our community and making further changes to our design review process in the future. Thank you, colleagues. Thank you. Council President. Councilmember Strauss. With that being said, that debate is now closed on this particular bill. Will the clerk please call the roll on the passage of the bill? Mosquera I. Peterson No. What? Yes. Strauss Yes. Purple? Yes. Lewis. Yes. MORALES Yes. President Gonzalez Yes. Seven in favor. One opposed. Thank you, Madam Clerk. The bill passes and the chair will sign it. Will the clerk please affix my signature to the legislation? Write item five Will the clerk please read agenda item five into the record? The report of the Transportation and Utilities Committee at 1035. Campbell 119898 related to city life departments amending subsection 21.49 points two zero 86.80 of the SAT on the code for defined the net wholesale revenue target used rate stabilization accounts operations for 2021 through 2,021% 2024. The committee recommends the bill passed. Thank you, Madam Clerk. Councilmember Peterson, you are chair of the committee and are recognized to provide the committee's report. Thank you. Council President So this council bill 119898 passed unanimously out of the Transportation Utilities Committee. This legislation sets the 2021 to 2024 baseline targets for a rate stabilization account, which helps Seattle see light to better manage and reduce risk from the volatility of the wholesale energy market on the utility's revenues. The good news is that the revenue from selling our excess energy is up this year and the utility forecasts that the current rate surcharges are likely to be reduced or removed in 2021. So with along with no general rate increase in 2021, that means our customers will likely experience further rate release in 2021. Again, this passed unanimously out of committee. Thank you. Councilmember Peterson, are there any additional comments on the bill? Hearing none. Will the clerk please call the role on the passage of the bill? Ms.. Skinner, I. Peterson. I so want. Yes. Strauss. Yes. Purple? Yes. Lewis. Yes. Morales. Yes. President Gonzalez, I. Favor favored unopposed. Thank you, Madam Clerk. The bill passes and the chair will sign it. Will the clerk please affix my signature to the legislation? Item six Will the clerk please read item six into the record? Agenda Item six. Constable 119899 Police Department and then inspection 21.2 49.1 25. At the same time as the code updated, the City Lights Department's open access, transmission, tariff and rates to meet changes in costs and regulations. The committee recommends the bill pass. Thank you so much, Madam Clerk. Councilor Peterson, you're the chair of the committee and are recognized in order to provide the committee report on this item. Thank you. Council President This is another technical measure for utility management. This legislation council bill 119899 amends our 2009 open access transmission tariff which governs how others can transmit their electricity between points on Seattle City Lights Transmission Systems. This updated version is necessary to account for the changing business needs of the utility and address expiring contracts with other transmission users. According to this fiscal note, this legislation will have minimal to no impact on city light. It passed our committee unanimously. Thank you, Councilmember Peterson, for those comments. Are there any additional comments on the bill? Hearing no additional comments on the bill. Will the clerk please call the roll on the passage of the bill? Must get a. I. Peterson. I. So what? Yes. Strauss. Yes. Herbold. Yes. Lewis. Yes. Morales. Yes. President Gonzalez. Yes. Eight in favor and unopposed. Thank you so much. The bill passes and the chair will sign it. Will the clerk please affix my signature to the legislation? Item number seven Will the clerk please read item seven into the record? Agenda Item seven Capital 119895 Relations Department granting authority for the Department to offer incentives program and the electrification of transportation for its customers, including the promotion of electric vehicle adoption and advertising programs to promote the utility services, incentives or rebates. And adding a new Chapter 21.53. The company recommends the bill pass. Thank you, Madam Clerk. Councilmember Peterson, you're the chair of the committee and are recognized in order to address this item. As you council president item seven on our agenda, the council bill 119895 and item eight and the resolution that we're going to vote on next, they go together as part of Seattle City Lights, efforts to expand electrification, as part of broader efforts to meet and preferably exceed goals in our city's climate action plan. Seattle needs to continue the hard work to address climate change and owning Seattle City Light enables us to expand opportunities to use clean hydroelectric power to decarbonize our economy, including throughout our transportation systems. Adopting the Electrification Strategic Investment Plan will build upon the collaboration between our executive and legislative branches of government, which includes the climate. Note that we recently passed to consider all new legislation through the lens of climate change, specifically, council bill 119895 amends the Seattle Municipal Code to accommodate recent changes in state law, allowing electric utilities to incentivize and promote transportation electrification. This is similar to the incentives that Seattle City uses to provide or encourage customers to make energy efficiency and conservation investments in their homes and commercial properties. I can also speak to the resolution as well, but I can also hold that until we get to item eight. Right. Thank you. Let's go ahead and hold out until we get to item eight. So for now, we're just addressing the underlying bill. Colleagues, any comments, any additional comments on the bill? Customers want this. Thank you. My comments are regarding this agenda item and also the following one, because the legislation in the two items is connected. This bill and the resolutions the Council will be voting on next are the legislation that is legally required by the state before Seattle City. Life can provide financial incentives to switch from vehicles that burn gas and diesel to electric vehicles that can run off city lights. Zero emission hydropower. When you compare Seattle to be Light, our publicly owned and operated utility to Puget Sound Energy, the private for profit utility that sells electricity generated by burning fracked natural gas in the neighboring cities. It is a very clear example of why public investments in the Green New Deal are essential to address climate change. The for profit capitalist market will not solve the existential crisis of climate catastrophe. Satellite generates electricity with hydropower, including from generators that were built as part of the New Deal in the 1930s. We need that scale of investment again in recent years to be Light has had many excellent small scale conservation conservation programs. Light bulbs have been affordable in Seattle, largely because City Lights subsidizes them right from the store. City Light has programs to help Seattle residents investigate where in our homes we are leaking energy to incentivize commercial building owners to install energy efficient lighting and air and to protect habitat land. In Eastern Washington. In recent years, City Light has pushed the Port of Seattle to electrify the Port one terminal at a time, one terminal at a time, and has built 16 electric vehicle charging stations that it owns and operates in Seattle to date with four more on the way. All of this has been possible because City Light is a public utility and these bills for transportation, electric electrification continue that work. The part of parts of these bills that I am most excited about are the transitions of metro busses to electricity and electrifying more of the port. Both are things that City Light has already been working on, but I'm glad that they're continuing in these bills. And I really wanted to congratulate all the. All the individuals and organizations in the environmental and climate justice community who have been pushing on all of these fronts for years. I am disappointed, however, that the mayor's office has not invested in more real resources into transportation electrification in Seattle rather than just plans. These documents are only a general plan, and the next step from here would be to write an implementation plan. And then after that, there could be new investments. In fact, in the mayor's budget, she specifically calls out the small city like funds dedicated to transportation electrification, but completely glosses over the fact that the budget lines that include transportation electrification have actually been significantly reduced since last year in our budget. My office has asked city council and just Jeff to look into this in more detail because there are parts of that budget line unrelated to Green New Deal programs. So, you know, we will have more to talk about at that time. But some of it is the funding allocated to Green New Deal programs that have on balance being cut, not increased by the mayor and the new proposed budget. So I will be voting yes on the two bills containing this transportation electrification plan. This job at satellite are extremely thorough and competent and the programs they implemented are effective and they implement are effective. And I also want to thank them for engaging with my office and answering the questions we had for this legislation. However, I just wanted to register my disappointment that there is not more real investment by the mayor in actually implementing the plans in 2021. Acute. Councilmember Swan, for those remarks, are there any additional comments on the bill? Harry hearing none. Will the clerk please call the roll on the passage of the bill? Get a. I. Peterson. I. The one. Yes. Strauss. Yes. Purple? Yes. Lewis. Yes. Morales. Morales. Yes. And President Gonzalez. All right. Eight in favor, nine opposed. Thank you, Madam Clerk. The bill passes and the chair will sign it. Will the clerk please affix my signature to the legislation? Item eight. Will the clerk please read the the title of item eight into the record? Agenda item eight Resolution 319 71 relating to the city department adopting a Transportation Electrification Strategic Investment Plan at the City Department that will guide the development of the utility's infrastructure strategy and investment priorities related to the electrification of transportation. The committee recommends the resolution be adopted. Thank you so much, Councilmember Peterson. You are chair of the committee and are recognized in order to provide the report on this item. Thank you. Council President. Just pausing to admire the little one there. This is resolution 31971. It would adopt Seattle City Lights, Transportation, Electrification, Strategic Investment Plan. It's required by House Bill 151 to pass in 2019. It allows for electric utilities to invest ratepayer funds in transportation electrification. This plan, which has been part of a multi-year planning effort, outlined Seattle City Lights, recommended strategic investment priorities based on a robust stakeholder outreach effort following adoption of the Strategic Investment Plan. The utility will begin the second phase of customer and community engagement to develop the utility's more detailed program offerings and metrics to increase electrification. See also heard from many stakeholders about the importance of City of Seattle aggressively working to reduce carbon emissions, including from the transportation sector. This investment plan will help with that. It was recommended unanimously by the committee. Thank you. Thank you, Councilmember Peterson, for those comments. Are there any additional comments on the resolution? Hearing none will work. Please call the roll on the adoption of the resolution. Oscar I. Peterson. I so want. Yes. Strauss. Yes. Herbold. Yes. Lewis. Yes. Morales. Yes. President Gonzalez. I ain't in favor and unopposed. The resolution is adopted and the chair will sign it. Will the clerk please affix my signature to the legislation? Okay. Last item. Adoption of other resolutions. Will the clerk please read the short title of item nine into the record? Agenda Item nine, Resolution 319 73 Setting the time and place for the hearings on the appeal to certain appellants during examiner case number. Thank you so much. Madam Clerk, I move to adopt resolution 31973. Is there a second? Second. Thank you so much. It's been moved and seconded to adopt the resolution. Councilmember Strauss, I understand that you are prepared to provide a report on this item and are recognized in order to do so. Thank you for letting me speak on behalf of Councilmember Juarez in regards to Resolution 31973, this bill sets the time and place for a hearing on 62 individual appeals to the hearing examiners findings and recommendation report of the waterfront wid or local improvement district number 6751. This resolution sets the hearing of each appeal to either December 1st, 2020, or January 5th, 2021, in the regularly scheduled Public Assets and Native Communities Committee to meet the requirements in the quasi Judicial Rules Council must take action this week via this resolution. This is a mandatory and procedural matter. I recommend the Council confirm Resolution 31973. Thank you, Council President and colleagues. Thank you, Councilmember Strauss, for that report. Are there any additional comments on the resolution? Hearing on will the court please call the role on the adoption of the resolution? Oceana I. Peterson. I so want. Yes. Strauss. Yes. Herbold. Yes. Lewis. Yes. Morales. Vice President Gonzalez I eight in favor and unopposed. Thank you, Madam Clerk. The resolution is adopted and the chair will sign it. Will the clerk please affix my signature to the legislation? Okay. Other business colleagues, Councilmember Juarez, had intended to be able to join us today, but unfortunately, that was not possible. So I'm going to move to excuse her from today's meeting. So if there is no objection, council members will be excused from today's meeting. Hearing no objection. Councilmember Juarez is excused from today's meeting. Is there any other business? Is there any other further business to come before the council? Councilmember Muscadet, please. Thank you very much, Madam President. Thanks as well for my council colleague, Councilmember Strauss, for reporting out this morning. I'm sorry I couldn't be there. As the council president noted, our daughter was sick this morning, but I did want to take this opportunity to remind folks there is a public hearing on the budget tomorrow at 5:30 p.m. public testimony opportunity opens up at 330 to sign up. We will be sending you all some images you can use for your social media. But I wanted to take this as a chance to do a PSA to get that public testimony on your calendar for tomorrow. Anybody who is interested in testifying. Thank you so much, council president. Thank you, Councilmember Muscat. And thanks for the reminder to the general viewing public about tomorrow's evening, a public hearing and the opportunity to sign up to give public comment and also hope Camila is feeling much better. Okay, colleagues, this does conclude items of business on today's agenda. Our next regularly scheduled city council meeting is on Monday, October 12th, 2020 at 2:00 PM. I hope you all have a wonderful afternoon and rest up for what promises to be a very long evening tomorrow. We are adjourned. Thank you. Bye bye. I.

AN ORDINANCE relating to the SODO Parking and Business Improvement Area; modifying the 2021 assessment values update; and amending Ordinance 125678. AN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending Section 21.49.090 of the Seattle Municipal Code to clarify the Department’s discretion to allow additional services on a parcel as it deems necessary to provide adequate service to customers. AN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Third Quarter 2020 Employment Ordinance; returning positions to the civil service system; and establishing a new title and corresponding rate of pay; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council. AN ORDINANCE relating to land use review decision and meeting procedures; temporarily modifying and suspending procedures in Titles 23 and 25 of the Seattle Municipal Code and amending Chapters 23.41, 23.49, 23.66, 23.79, 25.12, 25.16, 25.20, 25.21, 25.22, 25.24, and 25.30 of the Seattle Municipal Code. AN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending subsection 21.49.086.D of the Seattle Municipal Code to define the Net Wholesale Revenue target used in Rate Stabilization Account operations for 2021-2024. AN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending Section 21.49.125 of the Seattle Municipal Code; updating the City Light Department’s Open Access Transmission Tariff and rates to meet changes in costs and regulations. AN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; granting authority for the Department to offer incentive programs in the electrification of transportation for its customers, including the promotion of electric vehicle adoption and advertising programs to promote the utility’s services, incentives, or rebates; and adding a new Chapter 21.53 to the Seattle Municipal Code. A RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; adopting a Transportation Electrification Strategic Investment Plan for the City Light Department that will guide the development of the utility’s infrastructure strategy and investment priorities related to the electrification of transportation.

longbeach_3c2e262e-1ecc-4221-8362-1adb24a738a1

"Councilwoman Zendejas and. Councilwoman Allen present. Councilwoman Price. Councilman Super now cou(...TRUNCATED)

"Recommendation to increase appropriations in the Special Advertising and Promotion Group in the Cit(...TRUNCATED)

denver_7fb736ab-d1a3-4a0c-886f-736e809aef2b

"Welcome to the Denver City Council meeting of Monday, August 3rd. Please rise as you are able or jo(...TRUNCATED)

"A resolution approving a proposed Escrow Funding Agreement between the City and County of Denver an(...TRUNCATED)

longbeach_772929d6-ba5c-41c4-9925-952e1e0145b4

"Jazz has six members. Supported gay jazz, 88 for him. Council member, Patrick O'Donnell. Councilwom(...TRUNCATED)

"Recommendation to name the park site located on Walnut Avenue at 20th Street \"Jenni Rivera Memoria(...TRUNCATED)

longbeach_799f82f4-4b4b-478a-873c-fc5fa8625ddf

"Now, why did I decide to run? I've got to make. This sends them into the early. The men love journe(...TRUNCATED)

"Recommendation to, subject to prior review and consideration by the Personnel and Civil Service Com(...TRUNCATED)

full_052118V

"Good afternoon, everybody. Thank you for being here for our regularly scheduled meeting. This is it(...TRUNCATED)

"AN ORDINANCE relating to the Ethics Code; amending Sections 4.16.030 and 4.16.070 of the Seattle Mu(...TRUNCATED)

Full_060616V

"And I'm pleased that I can offer. Good afternoon. The June six, 2016 meeting of the Seattle City Co(...TRUNCATED)

"AN ORDINANCE relating to affordable housing; authorizing the Director of the Office of Housing to e(...TRUNCATED)

full_031416V

"Good afternoon, everybody. Thank you for being here. Today is March 14, 2016. This is our meeting f(...TRUNCATED)

"AN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle bike share program; authorizing a partial removal of the provi(...TRUNCATED)

full_091018V

"Didn't we warned you? Yeah, we did. We were, we went. Oh, I just. Yeah. I know. We're the same ones(...TRUNCATED)

"AN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent to (...TRUNCATED)

denver_c864617c-16e7-46e4-84ec-6a3da17f56de

"Second Monday of most months. Denver City Council Celebrates and promotes Imagine 2020 Denver's cul(...TRUNCATED)

"A bill for an ordinance changing the zoning classification for 2929 W. 10th Ave. in Sun Valley. \r\(...TRUNCATED)