Abstract:
A new architecture is proposed for making optical cross connect in wavelength division multiplexed networks. The value of optical networks incorporating all-optical cross connects is typically associated with being able to selectively route individual channel wavelengths through several network nodes without performing optical-electrical and electrical-optical conversion. From a network perspective, most work on the optical cross connect architectures have been concentrated on the highest possible capability for the cross-connect itself. The problem with considering optical cross connect architectures in isolation without attention to the rest of the network may lead to unnecessarily complicated hardware. In the proposed architecture, architecture considers the network as a whole and significant cost reductions as well as complexity reductions are realized.

Description:
PROVISIONAL APPLICATION  
       [0001]    The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 of a provisional application 60/411,007 filed on Sep. 16, 2002, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference. 
     
    
     
       FIELD OF THE INVENTION  
         [0002]    The field of the invention generally relates to optical cross connects, methods of forming optical cross connects, and related optical networking architectures and methods. More particularly, the invention relates to a new architecture and method for an optical cross connect that is particularly useful in wavelength division multiplexed networks.  
         BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
         [0003]    The value of optical networks incorporating all-optical cross connects (OCC) is typically associated with being able to selectively route individual channel wavelengths through several network nodes without performing optical-electrical and electrical-optical conversion.  
           [0004]    From a network perspective, most research on the OCC architectures have been concentrated on the highest possible capability for the cross-connect itself. For example, switch architectures with single wavelength granularity and fully non-blocking capability are considered indispensable to optical networks and have, therefore, been a subject of intense research. The term “non-blocking” refers to an ability of the optical switch to direct any spectral input to any output without precluding (or “blocking”) any of the possible connections for other spectral inputs and outputs.  
           [0005]    Typical OCC designs include:  
           [0006]    (i). a spectral DEMUX on each input fiber, followed by a space-division switch, followed by a MUX or combiner to direct the selectively-switched wavelengths to output fibers;  
           [0007]    (ii). a passive splitter after each input fiber, an optical filter on each split path, a space-division switch, followed by a combiner to direct filtered and selectively switched wavelengths to output fibers; and  
           [0008]    (iii). a passive splitter after each input fiber, a filter on each split path, and a combiner to direct filtered wavelengths to output fibers.  
           [0009]    [0009]FIG. 1 illustrates a conventional “broadcast and select” OCC apparatus  100  of architecture of (iii) as described. In particular, FIG. 1 illustrates a fully non-blocking OCC. In this OCC architecture, N*(N−1) filters are required for cross-connecting N diverse routes.  
           [0010]    The conventional OCC apparatus  100  includes a plurality of optical inputs  102  a plurality of optical outputs  104 . The conventional OCC apparatus  100  apparatus also includes local cross-connect  110  used for cross connecting the optical inputs  102  and outputs  104  so that optical signals flowing into the optical inputs  102  are directed to the appropriate optical outputs  104 .  
           [0011]    The local cross-connect  110  itself includes a plurality of optical couplers  106  and a plurality of optical filters  120  optically placed between each connected pair of optical couplers  106 . As seen, depending on the placement, each optical coupler  106  performs one of two functions—splitting the incoming optical signal for outputting to other optical coupler or combining optical signals from other optical couplers and outputting the outgoing optical signal.  
           [0012]    In the example shown in FIG. 1, there are 4 diverse routes. Cross-connecting the 4 routes requires 12 optical filters. Increasing the route by one to total 5 requires eight additional filters to total 20. In short, the fabric of the conventional OCC architecture requires N*(N−1) filters. In other words, the increase is quadratic.  
           [0013]    Generally, the conventional OCC architectures have optical signal flows that may be described as follows:  
           [0014]    (1) split the incoming optical signal;  
           [0015]    (2) perform optical filtering and/or switching; and  
           [0016]    (3) recombine optical signals into output filters.  
           [0017]    This is shown in FIG. 1 where there is an optical filter  120  after each split and before each recombine. Such design necessarily constrains the OCC to an effectively “localized” architecture since the optical processing is sandwiched between the splitter and combiner functions. Localization occurs when all of the optical switch components are required to be located at a single physical location in the network.  
           [0018]    This localization, while perhaps enabling to maximize the capability of the OCC node itself, may not be required or needed for the network, which the OCC node is a part of, as a whole. Further, it may lead to unnecessarily complicated hardware and connections that make up the network, thereby increasing its cost. 
       
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0019]    Features of the present invention will become more fully understood to those skilled in the art from the detailed description given hereinbelow with reference to the drawings, which are given by way of illustrations only and thus are not limitative of the invention, wherein:  
         [0020]    [0020]FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a conventional optical cross connect architecture;  
         [0021]    [0021]FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an optical cross connect architecture according to an embodiment of the present invention;  
         [0022]    [0022]FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an optically cross-connected fiber ring network according to an embodiment of the present invention;  
         [0023]    [0023]FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating a mesh-type optical cross connect network according to an embodiment of the present invention;  
         [0024]    [0024]FIG. 5 is a series of illustrations demonstrating how the multi-band-pass filter count drops as model network&#39;s transport system capacity increases by applying an embodiment of a technique of the present invention;  
         [0025]    [0025]FIG. 6 is a series of illustrations demonstrating how the multi-band-pass filter count drops as an actual example network&#39;s transport system capacity increases by applying an embodiment of a technique of the present invention;  
         [0026]    [0026]FIGS. 7 a - b  are block diagrams illustrating different embodiments of multi-band-pass filters according to the present invention; and  
         [0027]    [0027]FIG. 8 illustrates a method of cross-connecting a plurality of optical inputs and outputs according to an embodiment of the present invention. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION  
       [0028]    For simplicity and illustrative purposes, the principles of the present invention are described by referring mainly to exemplary embodiments thereof. The same reference numbers and symbols in different drawings identify the same or similar elements. Also, the following detailed description does not limit the invention. The scope of the invention is defined by the claims and equivalents thereof.  
         [0029]    The expression “optically communicates” as used herein refers to any connection, coupling, link or the like by which optical signals carried by one optical element are imparted to the “communicating element.” Such “optically communicating” devices are not necessarily directly connected to one another and may be separated by intermediate optical components and/or devices. Likewise, the expressions “connection”, “operative connection”, and “optically placed” as used herein are relative terms and do not necessarily require a direct physical connection.  
         [0030]    In general, an aspect of the present invention may be described having optical flows in different sequence as compared to the conventional optical cross-connection apparatus as follows:  
         [0031]    (1) optical filtering one or more input optical signals, while still keeping filtered signal in a single transmission medium;  
         [0032]    (2) cross-connecting between one or more inputs and one or more outputs; and  
         [0033]    (3) optical filtering one or more output optical signals.  
         [0034]    The cross connecting may be performed in a spectrally transparent manner. This process “localizes” only the cross-connection function and the optical filtering may be removed from the cross-connect. The optical filtering may be performed at the apparatus itself, by other nodes in the network, or not at all. Because the optical filtering is not constrained to the OCC, the filtering functionality becomes “distributed” on the network. The entire network may be considered to thereby increase efficiency and performance and reduce complications and costs.  
         [0035]    [0035]FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an optical cross-connect apparatus  200  according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown, the optical cross-connect apparatus  200  may include a plurality of optical inputs  202 - n , a plurality of optical outputs  204 - n , an OCC  210  provided between the plurality optical inputs  202 - n  and outputs  204 - n , and a plurality of optical filters  220  provided outside of the OCC  210 . In this instance, n is from 1 to 4 for each of the routes, but it should be understood that the number of routes is not so limited.  
         [0036]    By providing the optical filters  220  outside of the OCC  210 , only the cross-connection function is localized as noted above. The example in FIG. 2 shows that between each optical input  202 - n  and the OCC  210  and also between each optical output  204 - n  and the OCC  210 , an optical filter  220  is optically placed. Thus, FIG. 2 is an example of optical filtering (or processing) taking place within the optical cross-connect apparatus  200  itself.  
         [0037]    However, it is to be understood that the optical cross-connect apparatus  200  is not so limited. While FIG. 2 illustrates so, it is not necessary that an optical filter  220  be optically connected to each and every optical input  202 - n  and output  204 - n  within the apparatus. Indeed, it is not necessary to have any optical filters within the apparatus  200  at all. As indicated above, optical filtering may be performed by other nodes in the network (i.e “distributed”) or not at all.  
         [0038]    The OCC  210  may be spectrally transparent. In other words, the OCC  210  itself does not perform any spectrum (wavelength) blocking functions. If blocking functions are desired or required, they may be performed by appropriately placing one or more optical filters  220 , either within the apparatus  200  or within the network outside of the apparatus  200 .  
         [0039]    The OCC  210  may include a plurality of optical couplers  206 - m  appropriately placed and connected to perform optical splitting and combining functions so that optical signals may be directed as desired. One or more of the optical couplers  206 - m  may be passive optical couplers. It is to be noted that m is 1 to the actual number of couplers within the OCC  210  (in this instance, 8) to uniquely identify each coupler. For brevity and for ease of explanation, not all optical couplers are so numbered.  
         [0040]    Also, one or more of the optical filters  220  may be a muti-band-pass type filter  700   a  as shown in FIG. 7 a . As shown, the multi-band-pass filter (MBPF)  700   a  receives as optical input a spectrum of wavelengths represented by the symbol λ. These wavelengths may be viewed as a single optical channel or bands of optical channels where each channel is capable of carrying separate optical information. The MBPF  700   a  blocks a subset of the channels and outputs the remainder (or complementary set) of the channels of the spectrum. FIG. 7 b  illustrates a reconfigurable MBPF (RMBPF)  700   b  wherein the particular channel or channels blocked may be chosen through control signals. A description of a particular type of RMBPF may be found in a provisional application ______, Attorney Docket 4450-0403P, filed on Aug. 4, 2003 by the common Assignee of the present application and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.  
         [0041]    When the optical filtering function takes place outside the optical cross-connect fabric such as shown in FIG. 2, the maximum number of optical filters required is 2*N for cross-connecting N diverse routes. In other words, the increase is order N, i.e. linear. This makes increasing the number of routes for a cross-connect more practical, which in turn enables more cost-effective and capable networks to be designed.  
         [0042]    A method of cross-connecting the plurality of optical inputs  202 - n  and plurality of optical outputs  204 - n  may be described as follows. FIG. 8 illustrates an embodiment of such a method. As shown, the method  800  may include a step  810  of providing an optical cross-connect between a plurality of optical inputs. The method  800  may also include a step  820  of optically filtering at least one optical channel of an optical signal flowing into at least one of the inputs or flowing out of at least one of the outputs or both. The optical cross-connect may be spectrally transparent and filtering may be channel or band-pass filtering.  
         [0043]    An embodiment of the optical cross-connect apparatus may be described as follows. Referring back to FIG. 2, it is noted that the optical cross-connect  210  forms paths between the optical inputs  202 - n  and outputs  204 - n . For example, the optical couplers  206 - 4  and  206 - 3  enables a path (or connection) to be formed between the optical input  202 - 4  and the optical output  204 - 3 . Likewise, the optical couplers  206 - 4  and  206 - 1  enables another path to be formed between the optical input  202 - 4  and the optical output  204 - 1 . In the example illustrated in FIG. 2, a path is formed between each optical input  202 - n  and each optical output  204 - n . However, it is not necessary that a path be formed for each and every pair of optical inputs  202 - n  and outputs  204 - n.    
         [0044]    Also in the example illustrated in FIG. 2, the plurality of optical filter  220  is provided outside the cross-connect  210  such that each path is filtered at its input and output. However, it is not necessary that each path be filtered at both input and output. Indeed, it is not necessary that any of the paths within the apparatus  200  be filtered at all. This is because optical filtering may be performed by other nodes in the network or not at all. If it is desired that each path be filtered within the apparatus  200 , either the input of the path or the output of the path or both may be filtered.  
         [0045]    [0045]FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an optically cross-connected fiber ring network  300  according to an embodiment of the present invention. Subsequent description refers to single wavelengths (λ 1 , λ 2 , etc.) for ease of explanation, but it is to be understood that the same could be taken as specific wavelength bundles or bands.  
         [0046]    The network  300  may include an outer ring  302  and an inner ring  304 . The outer ring  302  carries optical signals in a clockwise direction and the inner ring  304  carries optical signals in a counter-clockwise direction, but they can be vice versa. The network  300  may also include an optical cross-connect apparatus  310 , of the type illustrated in FIG. 2. The apparatus  310  enables outer-to-out and inner-to-inner connections. While not shown, it is to be understood that other connections are possible, such as outer-to-inner and inner-to-outer.  
         [0047]    If a conventional optical cross-connect apparatus such as illustrated in FIG. 1 is used, such a cross-connection would require  12  optical filters for a fully populated OCC resulting in a more complicated hardware. In this embodiment, no optical filters are required at the apparatus  310 . The optical filtering may be absorbed or moved to adjacent ring nodes  306  as shown. It may be the case that one or more optical filters  308  are required for other purposes regardless, and this embodiment allows efficient utilization of the existing filters. Of course, the optical cross connect apparatus  310  may also include optical filters as well.  
         [0048]    While not explicitly shown in FIG. 3, a control component may be included. More specifically, the optical filters  308  may be controlled so as to reconfigurably block/pass desired channel or groups of channels. A conventional service channel, overlay IP network, DCC or other communication means may be used to communicate administrative, maintenance, and control information to further enable such a functionality.  
         [0049]    In addition, the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3 supports optically protected intra-ring connections such as λ 1  and λ 3 . The subscripts “w”, “p”, and “unp” refer to working, protected, and unprotected wavelength channels, respectively. It should be noted that protected wavelength cannot be reused among rings. For example, λ 1   p  and λ 3   p  are used only in the upper rings and the lower rings, respectively. Unprotected intra-ring connections may reuse wavelengths. For example, λ 2   unp  is used in both upper and lower rings.  
         [0050]    The same holds true for inter-ring connections where full optical protection requires that 2 wavelengths be used (λ 4  and λ 5 ) in this example. Unprotected connection can still be accomplished with a single wavelength.  
         [0051]    In networks that have wavelength-addressable nodes (i.e. a node that has a unique set of wavelengths associated with it), for example the networks that support laser-wavelength connectivity, the above compromise on wavelength reuse is removed. The bandwidth limitation would be the same regardless of the particular OCC architecture.  
         [0052]    [0052]FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating a mesh-type optical cross connect network  400  according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown, the network  400  may include a plurality of optical inputs  402 , a plurality of outputs  404 , an optical cross-connect  410 , a plurality of optical filters  420 , and an optical add/drop module (OADM)  430  with its own optical filters  432 . As connected, route  1  is part of a linear optical subnetwork. In this example, the OADM  430  includes first and second optical filters  432  optically connected to an optical input  402  and to an optical output  404 , respectively.  
         [0053]    In this view, the total bandwidth required to be accessible by the optical transport system is the sum of all bandwidth connections. Conventional OCC require total bandwidth to be maximum of the sum at each route independently. At a first glance, the network  400  may appear to be wasteful when compared to the conventional OCC. However, the following points should be noted:  
         [0054]    1. The bandwidth utilization differences between distributed and conventional architectures decrease as interconnect traffic become more asymmetric.  
         [0055]    2. If each bi-directional connection is required to be made with same wavelengths (same channels), conventional OCC is penalized and becomes identical to some embodiments of the present invention.  
         [0056]    3. The bandwidth that is not used for route interconnection at an OCC can be still recovered and used for “local” intra-route connections.  
         [0057]    4. As route demand exceeds a single line system capacity, a parallel line system may need to be turned up. This increases the degree of all nodes along that route by one, thus increasing their complexity. Regardless of the OCC architecture, this produces substantial wavelength blocking.  
         [0058]    [0058]FIGS. 5 and 6 illustrate two example networks that illustrate that optical filtering can be approached in a “distributed” fashion according to various embodiments of the present invention. Rather than consider each OCC node in isolation, optical filter locations are determined based on the total network topology and traffic demands. Thus, optical filtering becomes distributed. These figures illustrate the considerable simplification of OCC nodes, which thereby reduces network costs. It should be noted that as the line system capacity increases, the network requirement for wavelength reuse decrease, corresponding to a decreased number of required MBPF modules.  
         [0059]    Referring to FIGS. 5 and 6, each node in the network is uniquely numbered, and shown by a “*” on the plots. A PATH lists node pairs that have physical connectivity between each other, which is also shown by solid lines on the network plots. A DEMAND lists two node numbers and a total traffic channel demands flowing between these two nodes. It should be noted that physical PATHs and DEMANDs are independent. Circle on the plots indicate nodes that contain optical filters (MBPF). The results illustrate that as the capacity of the optical transmission systems increase, networks need progressively decreasing numbers of optical filters. Generally, optical filters allow for spectral re-use in a network, which is only needed if total network traffic demand exceeds transmission system capacity.  
         [0060]    While the invention has been described with reference to the exemplary embodiments thereof, it is to be understood that various modifications may be made to the described embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention thereof. The terms as descriptions used herein are set forth by way of illustration only and are not intended as limitations.