Abstract:
Methods for testing multiple data packet signal transceiver devices under test (DUTs) with a shared tester. The DUTs transmit their data packet signals until predetermined numbers of data packets have been transmitted or predetermined time intervals expire, following which, each DUT awaits a synchronization request to begin transmitting data packets to the tester. Alternatively, the tester determines when its receiver is available for receiving data packets, following which, synchronization requests are sent to respective DUTs to initiate their transmissions of data packets to the tester. Further alternatively, power levels among data packets initially transmitted from the DUTs are monitored to determine when they are indicative of them having settled. As each DUT data packet signal power settles, a status signal indicating the settled nature of each DUT is provided to the tester which then begins receiving the respective DUT data packet signals, as they settle in power, for analysis.

Description:
BACKGROUND 
       [0001]    The present invention relates to testing multiple data packet signal transceiver devices under test (DUTs), and in particular, to testing multiple DUTs with a shared tester to maximize tester use and thereby minimize test time. 
         [0002]    Many of today&#39;s electronic devices use wireless technologies for both connectivity and communications purposes. Because wireless devices transmit and receive electromagnetic energy, and because two or more wireless devices have the potential of interfering with the operations of one another by virtue of their signal frequencies and power spectral densities, these devices and their wireless technologies must adhere to various wireless technology standard specifications. 
         [0003]    When designing such wireless devices, engineers take extra care to ensure that such devices will meet or exceed each of their included wireless technology prescribed standard-based specifications. Furthermore, when these devices are later being manufactured in quantity, they are tested to ensure that manufacturing defects will not cause improper operation, including their adherence to the included wireless technology standard-based specifications. 
         [0004]    During testing of data packet signals sent by a DUT to a tester, the packets initially transmitted, e.g., when an otherwise properly operating DUT′ transmitter first begins transmitting, its power will vary, increasing and decreasing until it “settles” to the intended nominal power, with any further power variations normally deemed to be insignificant. At that time, after settling, the tester then begins capturing data packets for analysis. Earlier data packets captured during the settling time are essentially ignored for purposes of the analysis. However, their capturing nonetheless ties up capture and analysis resources of the tester. Thus, from a tester utilization perspective, the analysis functions of the tester remain idle during the transmitter power settling interval, and thus detracts from overall tester utilization. 
         [0005]    Current attempts to optimize tester use during testing will often predefine a test step sequence that a DUT will execute during a test, usually based on either signal transmission time or number of transmitted data packets. Consequently, the DUT will only execute a given test sequence for a predetermined time interval. When trying to test multiple DUTs contemporaneously, e.g., in parallel, one needs to design the test sequence to allow DUT performance to be analyzed in a worst case scenario where all DUTs request access to hardware at the same point in time. However, in most cases such a worst-case scenario will not occur, though all DUTs continue to execute their test sequences to satisfy the worst-case scenario. Hence, proportionally, a significant amount of test time is unproductive as the tester captures data packets unsuitable for analysis. 
       SUMMARY 
       [0006]    In accordance with the presently claimed invention, methods are provided for testing multiple data packet signal transceiver devices under test (DUTs) with a shared tester. The DUTs transmit their data packet signals until predetermined numbers of data packets have been transmitted or predetermined time intervals expire, following which, each DUT awaits a synchronization request to begin transmitting data packets to the tester. Alternatively, the tester determines when its receiver is available for receiving data packets, following which, synchronization requests are sent to respective DUTs to initiate their transmissions of data packets to the tester. Further alternatively, power levels among data packets initially transmitted from the DUTs are monitored to determine when they are indicative of them having settled. As each DUT data packet signal power settles, a status signal indicating the settled nature of each DUT is provided to the tester which then begins receiving the respective DUT data packet signals, as they settle in power, for analysis. 
         [0007]    In accordance with one embodiment of the presently claimed invention, a method for testing multiple data packet signal transceiver devices under test (DUTs) with a shared tester includes preparing each one of a plurality of DUTs for transmit signal (TX) testing by: 
         [0008]    initiating at least partially contemporaneous transmissions of respective initial pluralities of DUT data packets from a plurality of DUTs; 
         [0009]    terminating each one of the transmissions of respective initial pluralities of DUT data packets from the plurality of DUTs following at least one of
       transmission of a respective predetermined plurality of DUT data packets, or   a respective predetermined time interval; and       
 
         [0012]    initiating further at least partially contemporaneous transmissions of DUT data packets by one or more of the plurality of DUTs from which the transmission of a respective initial plurality of DUT data packets has been terminated following at least one of
       reception of a synchronization request signal, or   another respective predetermined time interval.       
 
         [0015]    In accordance with another embodiment of the presently claimed invention, a method for testing multiple data packet signal transceiver devices under test (DUTs) with a shared tester includes: 
         [0016]    following confirmation of availability of data packet signal receiver circuitry of a tester to receive a DUT data packet signal, conveying a synchronization request signal to one of a plurality of DUTs; 
         [0017]    waiting for at least the first to occur of
       reception of a response data packet signal responsive to the synchronization request signal, or   expiration of a response time interval for reception of the response data packet signal;       
 
         [0020]    following a failure to receive the synchronization confirmation signal prior to the expiration of the response time interval,
       conveying another synchronization request signal to another one of the plurality of DUTs, and   repeating the waiting; and       
 
         [0023]    following a successful reception of a response data packet signal prior to the expiration of the response time interval, receiving, with the tester, a DUT data packet signal from the one of the plurality of DUTs from which the response data packet signal was received prior to the expiration of the response time interval. 
         [0024]    In accordance with another embodiment of the presently claimed invention, a method for testing multiple data packet signal transceiver devices under test (DUTs) with a shared tester includes: 
         [0025]    receiving at least one status signal indicative of power variations among data packets within each one of a plurality of DUT data packet signals from a plurality of DUTs; 
         [0026]    following confirmation of availability of data packet signal receiver circuitry of a tester to receive a DUT data packet signal, and reception of the at least one status signal being indicative of a power variation less than a first variation among data packets within a DUT data packet signal from a first one of the plurality of DUTs, performing at least one of
       conveying a first synchronization request signal to the first one of the plurality of DUTs, or   receiving, with the tester, the DUT data packet signal from the first one of the plurality of DUTs; and       
 
         [0029]    following the reception of the DUT data packet signal from the first one of the plurality of DUTs, and reception of the at least one status signal being indicative of a power variation less than a second variation among data packets within a DUT data packet signal from a second one of the plurality of DUTs, performing at least one of
       conveying a second synchronization request signal to the second one of the plurality of DUTs, or   receiving, with the tester, the DUT data packet signal from the second one of the plurality of DUTs.       
 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         [0032]      FIG. 1  depicts a testing environment for testing multiple DUTs in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the presently claimed invention. 
           [0033]      FIG. 2  depicts a flowchart representing a test flow in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the presently claimed invention. 
           [0034]      FIG. 3  depicts a flowchart representing a test flow in accordance with further exemplary embodiments of the presently claimed invention. 
           [0035]      FIG. 4  depicts synchronization signal exchanges and data packet transmissions between multiple DUTs and a shared tester in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the presently claimed invention. 
           [0036]      FIG. 5  depicts a testing environment for testing multiple DUTs in accordance with further exemplary embodiments of the presently claimed invention. 
           [0037]      FIG. 6  depicts synchronization signal exchanges and data packet transmissions between multiple DUTs and a shared tester in accordance with further exemplary embodiments of the presently claimed invention. 
           [0038]      FIG. 7  depicts synchronization signal exchanges and data packet transmissions between multiple DUTs and a shared tester in accordance with further exemplary embodiments of the presently claimed invention. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
       [0039]    The following detailed description is of example embodiments of the presently claimed invention with references to the accompanying drawings. Such description is intended to be illustrative and not limiting with respect to the scope of the present invention. Such embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to practice the subject invention, and it will be understood that other embodiments may be practiced with some variations without departing from the spirit or scope of the subject invention. 
         [0040]    Throughout the present disclosure, absent a clear indication to the contrary from the context, it will be understood that individual circuit elements as described may be singular or plural in number. For example, the terms “circuit” and “circuitry” may include either a single component or a plurality of components, which are either active and/or passive and are connected or otherwise coupled together (e.g., as one or more integrated circuit chips) to provide the described function. Additionally, the term “signal” may refer to one or more currents, one or more voltages, or a data signal. Within the drawings, like or related elements will have like or related alpha, numeric or alphanumeric designators. Further, while the present invention has been discussed in the context of implementations using discrete electronic circuitry (preferably in the form of one or more integrated circuit chips), the functions of any part of such circuitry may alternatively be implemented using one or more appropriately programmed processors, depending upon the signal frequencies or data rates to be processed. Moreover, to the extent that the figures illustrate diagrams of the functional blocks of various embodiments, the functional blocks are not necessarily indicative of the division between hardware circuitry. 
         [0041]    As discussed in more detail below, data packet tester utilization is maximized and test time is minimized by avoiding use of tester resources, e.g., the receiver circuitry for capturing data packets for analysis, during the time that signal power levels of data packets transmitted by the DUTs (in predetermined sequences, e.g., in terms of numbers of packets or packet transmission time intervals) are settling to their intended nominal power levels. Hence, as transmitted power levels of other DUT data packets settle, data packets now being transmitted by a DUT whose output has already settled are received for capturing and analysis. Accordingly, the disclosed methods provide for separating or otherwise distinguishing between intervals during which DUT data packets are settling (in terms of transmitted signal power) before being received for capture and analysis. This ensures that the tester receiver circuitry used for capturing and analysis of data packets is used for those data packets (in sequences, as noted) for which the transmitted data packet signal power has already settled, concurrent with one or more other DUTs completing their respective transmitted signal power settling time intervals, during which their data packets are not received for capture and analysis. 
         [0042]    Referring to  FIG. 1 , in accordance with exemplary embodiments, a testing environment  100  for testing multiple DUTs includes a tester  102 , signal routing circuitry  104  (e.g., multiplexor or switch matrix circuitry) and the DUTs  106 . (For purposes of this discussion, testing is discussed in the context of three DUTs being tested contemporaneously, or in parallel, though it will be understood that the number of DUTs can be more or fewer as desired.) 
         [0043]    Signal paths  103 ,  105  between the tester  102 , routing circuitry  104  and DUTs  106  are provided, typically in the form of conductive signal paths implemented using controlled impedance radio frequency (RF) cables and connectors (e.g., co-axial,). During transmit (TX) signal testing, data packet signals from the DUTs  106  are conveyed via the signal paths  105  to the routing circuitry  104 , which routes (e.g., multiplexes or switches) the desired or selected signal via the signal path  103  to the tester  102 . Such signal routing is controlled in accordance with one or more control signals  115 , which can be provided by the tester  102  or another control signal source (not shown) external or remote from the tester  102 , such as a personal computer. The routed data packet signal is received by the tester  102  using receiver circuitry  102   a , e.g., in the form of a vector signal analyzer (VSA), where the data packets are captured for analysis. 
         [0044]    During receive (RX) signal testing, a data packet signal is provided by a signal source  102   g  within the tester  102 , e.g., in the form of a vector signal generator (VSG). This signal is conveyed via the signal path  103  to the router circuitry  104 , which routes the signal to the desired DUT  106   a ,  106   b ,  106   c, . . . .    
         [0045]    Referring to  FIG. 2 , in accordance with exemplary embodiments, test flow  200  for testing each one of multiple DUTs  106  can proceed as shown, with each being tested as part of a concurrent test sequence by performing each of the depicted steps. Initially, each DUT will initiate transmission of its data packets  202 . It is then determined  204  whether a prescribed number of data packets have been sent, or, alternatively, whether a prescribed time interval has elapsed or expired. If not, transmission of data packets continues  202 . However, if the prescribed number of data packets has been transmitted, or the prescribed time interval has elapsed, the DUT awaits  208  reception of a synchronization request signal from the tester. Following reception of such synchronization request signal, the DUT may respond by transmitting a synchronization confirmation signal  210 , and resumes transmitting test data packets for reception, capture and analysis by the tester. 
         [0046]    Referring to  FIG. 3 , in accordance with further exemplary embodiments, program flow  300  from the perspective of the tester  102  can proceed as shown. Initially, the tester determines  302  whether the signal reception circuitry (e.g., the VSA) is available to receive a data packet signal for capture and analysis. If not, the receiver circuitry continues to be monitored  320  for its availability. After it becomes available, the tester transmits a synchronization request signal  304  to a selected DUT. The tester then waits during a response time interval  306  for reception of a synchronization confirmation signal from the DUT to which the synchronization request signal was conveyed. Alternatively, tester waits during a predetermined response time interval  306  for reception of data packets from the DUT. If no synchronization confirmation signal is received, or if no data packets are received from the DUT within the predetermined response time interval, the routing circuitry is set  322  to select another DUT (i.e., to convey signals between the tester and selected DUT), following which another synchronization request signal is transmitted  324  to such selected DUT. 
         [0047]    Following reception of a synchronization confirmation signal from a DUT, the tester begins receiving data packets  308  from the DUT with which synchronization has been established for capture and analysis. Following completion of such reception of data packets from the selected DUT, the routing circuitry is again set  310  to select another DUT, following which, the tester again checks for availability  302  of the receiver circuitry following its prior use for reception of data packets from the previous DUT. 
         [0048]    Referring to  FIG. 4 , in accordance with exemplary embodiments, interaction of signals between the tester and multiple DUTs (e.g., in the testing environment  100  of  FIG. 1 ) begins with the DUTs  106   a ,  106   b ,  106   c  transmitting initial data packets  411 ,  412 ,  413  (in sequences, as noted above) during their respective power settling time intervals. The point in time that each DUT  106   a ,  106   b ,  106   c  begins transmitting is based upon completion of its prior transmission, and thus is at least somewhat random. Meanwhile, the tester  102  seeks to initiate test flow by transmitting multiple synchronization request signals  400 , e.g., by sending synchronization request signals  401 ,  402 ,  403  in a round-robin manner to the respective DUTs  106   a ,  106   b ,  106   c  pending their completion of signal power settling. 
         [0049]    As shown, signal power for the first DUT  106   a  is the first to be considered settled (e.g., the DUT  106   a  has completed transmission of a predetermined number of data packets following which power settlement is presumed). Accordingly, in response to its synchronization request signal  401  received from the tester  102  following its power settling, the first DUT  106   a  responds with a synchronization confirmation signal  431 , following which, its subsequently transmitted data packets  416  are received and captured by the tester  102 . 
         [0050]    Following completion of its capture of the data packets  416 , the tester  102  resumes transmission of synchronization request packets  402 ,  403  for the second  106   b  and third  106   c  DUTs. By then, signal power levels for the second DUT  106   b  have not yet settled. However, power levels for the third DUT  106   c  have reached a state to be considered settled, so it responds to its synchronization request signal  403  from the tester  102  by transmitting, in response, synchronization confirmation signal  433 , following which its subsequently transmitted data packets  418  are received and captured by the tester  102 . 
         [0051]    Following completion of its capture of these data packets  416 , the tester  102  resumes transmission with another synchronization request packet  404  for the first DUT  106   a . However, the first DUT  106   a  has started another packet sequence  421  for which its signal power levels for have not yet settled. Meanwhile, though, signal power levels for the second DUT  106   b  have reached a state to be considered settled. Accordingly, it responds to its synchronization request signal  402  from the tester  102  by transmitting, in response, a synchronization confirmation signal  432 , following which, its subsequently transmitted data packets  417  are received and captured by the tester  102 . 
         [0052]    The synchronization request packets  401 ,  402 ,  403 ,  404 , . . . can be transmitted at different frequencies, as desired, in accordance with their respective positions in the overall test flow for the different DUTs  106 . 
         [0053]    Referring to  FIG. 5 , a testing environment  100   a  in accordance with further exemplary embodiments includes power detection, or measurement, circuits  110  disposed between the routing circuitry  104  and DUTs  106 . The respective power detectors  110   a ,  110   b ,  110   c  detect, or measure, the power levels (e.g., by sampling individual peak data packet signal levels) of the data packet signals beings transmitted by the corresponding DUTs  106   a ,  106   b ,  106   c  via the signal paths  105   a ,  105   b ,  105   c  to the routing circuitry  104 . The power detectors  110  each provide one or more data signals  111   a ,  111   b ,  111   c  indicative of the individual DUT data packet signal powers. These data signals  111   a ,  111   b ,  111   c  are processed by control circuitry  112  to provide one or more control signals  113  to the tester  102 . These control signals  113  can be conveyed directly to the receiver circuitry  102   a  or the signal generator circuitry  102   g , or both, or can be further processed by internal control circuitry  102   c  within the tester  102  prior to use in controlling one or both of the receiver  102   a  and generator  102   g  circuitry. These detected power level signals  111  can be used, via the control signals  113  to the tester  102 , to inform the tester  102  whether and when the data packet signal power from each DUT  106   a ,  106   b ,  106   c  has settled. 
         [0054]    Alternatively, the power detectors  110   a ,  110   b ,  110   c  can be used to detect the respective data packets, in which case the data signals  111   a ,  111   b ,  111   c  can be indicative of the number of data packets that have been transmitted by the respective DUTs  106   a ,  106   b ,  106   c . Based upon a priori knowledge of the power settling characteristics of the DUTs  106  (e.g., empirical test data of similar DUTs known to be good), the data signals  111   a ,  111   b ,  111   c  will then also be indicative of whether and when the power levels of the data packets transmitted by the respective DUTs  106   a ,  106   b ,  106   c  have settled. In turn, these signals will also be indicative of the states of readiness on the part of the respective DUTs  106   a ,  106   b ,  106   c  to be responsive to synchronization requests. 
         [0055]    Additionally, data packet detection capabilities of the power detectors  110   a ,  110   b ,  110   c  can be advantageously used to enable more informed planning for and uses of the tester  102  resources. For example, the data signals  111   a ,  111   b ,  111   c  can be monitored to identify when flows of data packets from the respective DUTs  106   a ,  106   b ,  106   c  begin and end, and thereby enable real time determinations of whether and when the tester  102  should be capturing data packets with the receiver circuitry  102   a  or providing test data packets with the signal source  102   g , depending upon requirements of the test currently being performed or scheduled to be performed. 
         [0056]    Referring to  FIG. 6 , in accordance with exemplary embodiments, interactions of data packet signals between the tester  102  and DUTs  106  in the testing environment  100   a  of  FIG. 5  can occur as shown. The power detectors  110   a ,  110   b ,  110   c  can determine when predetermined numbers of data packets have been transmitted by the respective DUTs  106   a ,  106   b ,  106   c , following which, synchronization request packets are transmitted. For example, the first power detector  110   a  monitors the data packet stream transmitted by its associated DUT  106   a , and when the expected number of data packets  411  have been transmitted, the control circuitry  112  initiates scheduling of a synchronization request packet  401  for transmission by the DUT  106   a . Similarly, when the second DUT  106   b  completes transmission of its expected number of data packets  412 , the control circuitry  112  initiates scheduling of a synchronization request packet  402  for transmission by the DUT  106   b . However, as depicted in the figure, the tester  102  is receiving and capturing data packets  416  from the first DUT  106   a , and is, therefore, currently unavailable for communications with the second DUT  106   b . Accordingly, transmission of the second synchronization request packet  402  is delayed until completion of the capturing of data packets  416  from the first DUT  106   a . Monitoring of data packets  413  from the third DUT  106   c , capturing of data packets  417  from the second DUT  106   b , and delaying of transmission of the synchronization request packet  403  from the third DUT  106   c  are similarly performed. 
         [0057]    Referring to  FIG. 7 , in accordance with further exemplary embodiments, e.g., again when testing in the environment  100   a  of  FIG. 5 , alternative signal interactions can occur as shown. For example, the power levels of the data packets  411  from the first DUT  106   a  may settle more quickly, e.g., as of the next-to-last data packet  411   a  of the data packet sequence  411 . This is detected by the corresponding power detector  110   a , which signals  111   a  to the tester  102  that data packet reception and capture can begin. Accordingly, the tester  102  begins receiving and capturing data packets  416   a  prior to the exchange of the synchronization request  401  and synchronization confirmation  431  signals. Accordingly, one or more trailing packets of the initial sequence  411  of data packets may be captured, as well as the synchronization confirmation  431  packet, and one or more of the trailing data packets  416  subsequently transmitted may not be captured. 
         [0058]    Similarly, this may happen with another DUT  106   b  for which transmitted power has settled as of the next-to-last data packet  412   a , again, prior to the exchange of the synchronization request  402  and synchronization confirmation  432  signals. As before, this may result in receiving and capturing one or more trailing packets of the initially transmitted data packets  412  and failure to receive and capture one or more trailing packets of the subsequently transmitted data packets  417 . 
         [0059]    Meanwhile, notwithstanding a similar early settling of power levels of the data packets  413  from the remaining DUT  106   c , exchange of the synchronization request  403  and synchronization confirmation  433  signals occurs later, e.g., due to the unavailability of the receiver circuitry of the tester  102  during reception and capture of data packets from the second DUT  106   b . Accordingly, reception and capture of data packets  418   a  from the third DUT  106   c  occurs without also receiving and capturing one or more trailing packets of the initially transmitted data packets  413 . 
         [0060]    Alternatively, the test environment  100   a  can be programmed or otherwise controlled such that, following availability of the receiver circuitry of the tester  102 , priority for reception and capture of data packets can be based on the order in which power settling has occurred. Accordingly, in this example, since the power levels of the data packets  413  from the third DUT  106   c  have settled earlier than those of the data packets  412  from the second DUT  106   b , the receiver circuitry of the tester  102  will synchronize with and capture packets from the third DUT  106   c  first. 
         [0061]    Various other modifications and alterations in the structure and method of operation of this invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and the spirit of the invention. Although the invention has been described in connection with specific preferred embodiments, it should be understood that the invention as claimed should not be unduly limited to such specific embodiments. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the present invention and that structures and methods within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.