Abstract:
A process for the treatment of contaminants using metal scavenger is disclosed. The metal scavengers individually comprise a polyamine derivative and a polyethyleneimine derivative. The polyamine derivative is formed of a polyamine having a molecular weight not higher than 500 and contains, per molecule of the polyamine, at least one dithiocarboxyl group or a salt thereof as an N-substituting group substituted for an active hydrogen atom of the polyamine. The polyethyleneimine derivative is formed from a polyethyleneimine having an average molecular weight of at least 5,000 and contains, per molecule of the polyethyleneimine, at least one dithiocarboxyl group or a salt thereof as an N-substituting group substituted for an active hydrogen atom of the polyethyleneimine.

Description:
This application is a continuation-in-part of our commonly assigned, copending U.S. application Ser. No. 07/837,609, filed Feb. 21, 1992, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of our commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/574,067, now abandoned. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     Field of the Invention 
     The present invention relates to the process for the removal of heavy metals from contaminants such as fly ash, sludge, soil and slag. 
     Description of the Related Art 
     To cope with the ever-increasing contamination problem of rivers, seas and the like due to waste water from factories, more stringent regulations have been introduced to prevent waste water contamination. Current regulations require metals contained in waste water, to be lowered to their corresponding prescribed concentrations before discharging it as an effluent into the environment. Further, various heavy metals are contained in various contaminants, such as slag discharged from mines, fly ash occurring upon incineration of waste at waste incineration plants, sludge produced as industrial waste upon neutralizing coagulation and sedimentation or coagulant-assisted sedimentation in the course of treatment of waste water, highly contaminated soil, and the like. Runoff of such heavy metals into underground water, rivers, and the seas has been increasingly causing problems. It is, therefore, a matter of urgent necessity to establish an effective process for the treatment of such heavy metals. Stringent regulations have been imposed for heavy metals harmful to the human body--such as mercury, cadmium, lead, zinc, copper and chromium. As far as waste water is concerned, a variety of processes have been proposed for the removal of metals. Known processes of this sort include ion flotation, ion exchanging, electrolytic floating, electrodialysis and reverse osmosis as well as the neutralizing coagulation and sedimentation in which an alkaline neutralizing agent such as calcium hydroxide or sodium hydroxide is added to convert metals into their hydroxides and the resultant metal hydroxides are coagulated and sedimented by a high molecular coagulant and then removed. 
     However, ion flotation, ion exchanging, electrolytic floating, electrodialysis and reverse osmosis involve problems in the degree of removal of heavy metals, operability, running cost, etc. Under these circumstances, these are used only for the treatment of certain special waste waters. On the other hand, the neutralizing coagulation and sedimentation process is accompanied by the problem that a sludge of metal hydroxides is formed in a large quantity but dewatering of this sludge is difficult as is its transportation due to the large volume. In addition, it is very difficult to remove heavy metals to levels below their respective effluent standards. Moreover, these sludges involve the problem that they may be dissolved again depending on the manner of disposal, thereby causing secondary contamination. 
     In contrast, the treatment of waste water by a metal scavenger can overcome the problems described above, so that metal scavengers are widely used in recent years. Of metal scavengers of this sort, there are known metal scavengers, each of which is composed of a polyamine derivative containing one or more dithiocarboxyl groups as functional groups. Various waste water processes making use of such metal scavengers have hence been proposed (for example, Japanese Patent Publication Nos. 39358/1981, 57920/1985 and 3549/1989 and Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 65788/1987). 
     The above polyamine derivatives have excellent metal-scavenging efficiency and upon scavenging metal ions, form large floc of high sedimentation velocity. They can therefore perform the removal of metal ions from waste water more efficiently than conventional processes. However, adsorption of chromium (III), nickel, cobalt and manganese is still not considered sufficient. A cake obtained by separating and solidifying floc formed as a result of adsorption of metals on metal scavengers is disposed by incineration or by solidification with cement. When conventional metal scavengers are used, the cake has a relatively high water content. This may lead to a problem such that enormous energy is required upon incineration of the cake or the cake has a large volume and requires an unreasonably large amount of labor and money for its processing and disposal. 
     As a method for the disposal of metals contained in fly ash, sludge, slag or soil, it has heretofore been the practice to use such metal-containing waste for reclamation or landfilling or to dump it in the ocean after solidifying it with cement as is. These methods are not considered safe because there is the potential danger that such metals may run off through the cement layer. Hence, there has been a strong demand for the development of an absolutely safe disposal method. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention has been completed to overcome the above problems. An object of the present invention is therefore to provide a metal scavenger which can more efficiently scavenge and remove a wide variety of metal ions in waste water, can reduce the water content of cake compared with the conventional metal scavengers and can improve the efficiency of the cake treatment and processing work. Another object of the present invention is to provide a process for the treatment of waste water by using such a metal scavenger. A further object of the present invention is to provide a process for the treatment of contaminants which are solids or semisolids containing at least one heavy metal such as fly ash, sludge, slag, soil or the like, so that upon its disposal by solidification with cement and subsequent ocean dumping, reclamation or landfilling, the volume of cake can be reduced to save the cement to be used and hence to facilitate the disposal such as reclamation or landfilling and the heavy metal contained in the fly ash, sludge, slag, soil or the like can be firmly immobilized to prevent its runoff. 
     In one aspect of the present invention, there is thus provided a metal scavenger comprising: 
     a polyamine derivative containing, per molecule of a polyamine having a molecular weight not higher than 500, at least one dithiocarboxyl group or a salt thereof as an N-substituting group substituted for an active hydrogen atom of the polyamine; such that at least 30% of the substitutable active hydrogen atoms contained in the polyamine have been substituted by the dithiocarboxyl group or a salt thereof; and 
     a polyethyleneimine derivative containing, per molecule of a polyethyleneimine having an average molecular weight of at least 5,000, at least one dithiocarboxyl group or a salt thereof as an N-substituting group substituted for an active hydrogen atom of the polyethyleneimine such that at least 40% of the substitutable polyethyleneimine have been substituted by the dithiocarboxyl group or salt thereof. The mixing ratio of polyamine derivative to the polyethyleneimine derivative is about 9-7:1-3 by weight. 
     In another aspect of the present invention, there is also provided a process for the treatment of waste water, which comprises adding the above metal scavenger to the waste water to adsorb metal ions contained in the waste water. 
     In a further aspect of the invention, there is also provided a process for the treatment of contaminants which are solids or semisolids. Such solids or semisolids include fly ash, slag, soil or sludge containing at least one heavy metal, which comprises adding and mixing the metal scavenger with the fly ash, slag, soil or sludge to immobolize the heavy metal. The metal scavenger to be mixed with the contaminants comprises 
     a polyamine derivative containing, per molecule of a polyamine having a molecular weight not higher than 500, at least one dithiocarboxyl group or a salt thereof as an N-substituting group substituted for an active hydrogen atom of the polyamine; 
     a polyethyleneimine derivative containing, per molecule of a polyethyleneimine having an average molecular weight of at least 5,000, at least one dithiocarboxyl group or a salt thereof as an N-substituting group substituted for an active hydrogen atom of the polyethyleneimine. 
     Since floc formed as a result of scavenging of metals is large and has a high sedimentation velocity, the waste-water treatment process of the present invention, making use of the metal ion scavenger of the present invention, can efficiently scavenge and remove metal ions from waste water. Moreover, the use of the metal scavenger of the present invention makes it possible to reduce the incorporation of water in floc compared with the use of the conventional scavengers, whereby cake obtained by separating and solidifying the floc has a lower water content to facilitate the disposal of the cake. In addition, the metal scavengers according to the present invention have excellent scavenging ability even for metal ions such as chromium (III), nickel, cobalt and manganese to which the conventional metal scavengers do not have good absorbability. They can therefore efficiently scavenge a still wider variety of metal ions than the conventional metal scavengers, bringing about a further advantage such that the range of applicable waste waters has been enlarged. 
     The metal scavengers of the present invention can be used in combination with a sodium sulfide. This waste-water treatment process can form floc having a greater sedimentation velocity, thereby bringing about another advantage that more efficient treatment of waste water can be performed. 
     According to the treatment process of this invention for fly ash, sludge, slag, soil or the like, one or more heavy metals contained therein can be firmly immobilized. When the thus-treated fly ash, sludge, slag, soil or the like is solidified with cement and then disposed by ocean dumping or reclamation or landfilling, there is no, or much less, danger that the heavy metals could run off through the cement layer. Moreover, the treatment by the present process makes it possible to reduce the volume of the material treated, so that the volume upon disposal can be reduced. This brings about advantages such that less cement is required for solidification and the handling of the treated waste upon its disposal can be facilitated. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     The polyamine derivative and polyethyleneimine derivative employed in this invention are compounds which contain at least one dithiocarboxyl group --CSSH or a salt thereof, for example, an alkali metal salt such as the sodium salt or potassium salt, an alkaline salt such as the calcium salt, the ammonium salt or the like (dithiocarboxyl group and its salts will hereinafter be called merely &#34;dithiocarboxyl groups&#34; collectively) as an N-substituting group substituted for an active hydrogen atom bonded to a nitrogen atom of a polyamine molecule containing primary and/or secondary amino groups or a polyethyleneimine molecule containing primary and/or secondary amino groups. These polyamine derivatives and polyethyleneimine derivatives can be obtained, for example, by reacting carbon disulfide with a polyamine and a polyethyleneimine, respectively. The active hydrogen atom of the terminal dithiocarboxyl group can be replaced by treating the reaction mixture with an alkali such as sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide or ammonium hydroxide after the completion of the above reaction or by conducting the above reaction in the presence of an alkali. The reaction of the polyamine or polyethyleneimine and carbon disulfide is conducted in a solvent, preferably water or an alcohol at 30-100° C. for 1-10 hours, especially at 40-70° C. for 2-5 hours. 
     Preferably, at least 30%, and more preferably from about 56 to 100% of the substitutable active hydrogen atoms contained in the polyamine are substituted by the dithiocarboxyl group. Also preferably at least 40%, and more preferably from about 43% to about 99% of the substitutable active hydrogen atoms contained in the polyethyleneimine are substituted by the dithiocarboxyl group. The high rate of substitution provides the metal scavenger with much greater efficiency. 
     The polyamine forming the polyamine derivative which constitutes the metal scavenger of this invention is preferably polyamine having a molecular weight not greater than 500, most preferably a polyamine having a molecular weight of 60-250 Illustrative of the polyamine include alkylenediamines such as ethylenediamine, propylenediamine, butylenediamine and hexamethylenediamine; polyalkylenepolyamines such as diethylenetriamine, dipropylenetriamine, dibutylenetriamine, triethylenetetramine, tripropylenetetramine, tributylenetetramine, tetraethylenepentamine, tetrapropylenepentamine, tetrabutylenepentamine, pentaethylenehexamine, and polyamines represented by the formula H--(NH--CH 2  CH 2  CH) m  --NH--CH 2  CH 2  --NH--(CH 2  CH 2  CH 2  --NH) n  --H (wherein m and n are integers such that m+n=1-8); phenylenediamine; o-, m- and p-xylenediamines; iminobispropylamine; monomethylaminopropylamine; methyliminobispropylamine; 1,3-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane; 1,3-diaminopropane; 1,4-diaminobutane; 3,5-diaminochlorobenzene; melamine; 1-aminoethylpiperazine; diaminophenyl ether; tolidine; m-toluylenediamine. They can be used either singly or in combination. 
     The polyethyleneimine forming the skeleton of the polyethyleneimine derivative as the other component of the metal scavenger of this invention is preferably a polyethyleneimine having an average molecular weight of at least 5,000, more preferably an average molecular weight of 10,000-200,000, most preferably a molecular weight of 20,000-150,000. 
     The above polyamine and polyethyleneimine, which hereinafter may be collectively called &#34;polyamines&#34; may also contain one or more alkyl, acyl and/or β-hydroxyalkyl groups as N-substituting groups. Introduction of one or more alkyl groups as N-substituting groups can be achieved by reacting the above polyamines (or polyamines with at least one dithiocarboxyl group introduced as a substituent) with an alkyl halide. To introduce one or more acyl groups as N-substituting groups, it is only necessary to react the above polyamines (or polyamines with at least one dithiocarboxyl group introduced as substituent) with an epoxyalkane. The N-substituting alkyl groups preferably contain 2-18 carbon atoms, while the N-substituting acyl groups preferably contain 2-30 carbon atoms. On the other hand, the N-substituted-β-hydroxyalkyl groups preferably contain 2-35 carbon atoms. 
     The metal scavenger of this invention is a mixture of the polyamine derivative containing at least one dithiocarboxyl group and the polyethyleneimine derivative containing at least one dithiocarboxyl group. The mixing ratio of the polyamine derivative to the polyethyleneimine derivative is preferably 9-7:1-3 by weight. 
     The metal scavenger of this invention can efficiently scavenge out metals from waste water even when employed alone, as floc formed as a result of adsorption of the metals is large and moreover has a high sedimentation velocity. However, combined use of at least one of sodium sulfides such as sodium monosulfide, sodium polysulfides and sodium hydrogensulfide makes it possible to increase the sedimentation velocity of floc further so that still more efficient treatment is feasible. Exemplary sodium polysulfides include sodium disulfide, sodium trisulfide, sodium tetrasulfide and sodium pentasulfide. When the metal scavenger of this invention is used in combination with such a sodium sulfide, their mixing ratio may range from 1:99 to 99:1 with the range of from 20:80 to 98:2 being particularly preferred. When the metal scavenger of this invention and the sodium sulfide are employed in combination, they may be added to waste water after mixing them in advance or they may be added separately to waste water. The former addition is however preferred. When they are added separately, effects are substantially the same whichever additive is added first. 
     Upon addition of the metal scavenger of this invention to waste water, the metal scavenger can be used in an amount of 0.8-1.4 molar equivalents, especially 0.9-1.2 molar equivalents of the total amount of metal ions in the waste water when the metal scavenger is used alone. When it is used in combination with a sodium sulfide, they can be used in a total amount of 0.8-1.4 molar equivalents, notably 0.9-1.2 molar amounts of the total amount of metal ions in the waste water. 
     The metal scavenger of this invention can successfully scavenge metal ions in waste water over a pH range of 3-10. It is however particularly preferred to adjust the pH of waste water to a level in a range of 4-9. Any acid or alkali can be used to adjust the pH of waste water as long as it does not impair the formation of floc. In general, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, nitric acid or the like is used as an acid while sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide or the like is employed as an alkali. 
     To immobilize one or more heavy metals contained in fly ash, sludge, slag or soil, with the metal scavenger of this invention, an aqueous solution of the metal scavenger in an amount about 1.2-3.0 times as much as that required to scavenge the heavy metals contained in the fly ash, sludge, slag or soil is added and mixed with the fly ash, sludge, slag or soil. Water may be added further to facilitate the mixing work. A pH range of 3-10 is preferred to scavenge heavy metals in slag. It is, therefore, preferable to adjust the pH of the slag with the above-described acid or alkali so that the slag has a pH in the above range upon its treatment with the metal scavenger. 
     The metal scavenger of this invention can scavenge metal ions such as mercury, cadmium, lead, zinc, copper, chromium (VI), arsenic, gold, silver, platinum, vanadium and thallium as efficiently as or more efficiently than conventional metal scavengers and moreover, can also efficiently scavenge metal ions whose scavenging is difficult by the conventional metal scavengers, such as chromium (III), nickel, cobalt and manganese. 
     The present invention will hereinafter be described in further detail by the following examples. 
     Examples 1-12 and Comparative Examples 1-17: 
     Synthesis of certain polyamine derivatives and polyethyleneimine derivatives were conducted in the following manner. 
     SYNTHESIS OF POLYETHYLENEIMINE DERIVATIVE 1 
     Added to 333.3 parts by weight of a 30% aqueous solution of a polyethyleneimine having an average molecular weight of 10,000 were 400 parts by weight of a 10% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide. The temperature of the resultant mixture was adjusted to 40° C. under stirring, followed by the gradual addition of 76 parts by weight of carbon disulfide. After completion of the addition, the reaction was allowed to proceed at 45° C. for 15 hours so that Polyethyleneimine Derivative 1 was obtained. The rate of substitution by the dithiocarboxyl group was 43%. 
     SYNTHESIS OF POLYETHYLENEIMINE DERIVATIVE 2 
     Added to 500 parts by weight of a 30% aqueous solution of a polyethyleneimine having an average molecular weight of 70,000 were 1,120 parts by weight of a 10% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide. Carbon disulfide (212 parts by weight) were then reacted in a similar manner to the foregoing synthesis, whereby Polyethyeleneimine Derivative 2 was obtained. The rate of substitution by the dithiocarboxyl group was 80%. 
     SYNTHESIS OF POLYETHYLENEIMINE DERIVATIVE 3 
     Added to 500 parts by weight of a 30% aqueous solution of a polyethyleneimine having an average molecular weight of 100,000 were 1,400 parts by weight of a 10% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide. Carbon disulfide (265 parts by weight) were then reacted in a similar manner to the foregoing syntheses, whereby Polyethyleneimine Derivative 3 was obtained. The rate of substitution by the dithiocarboxyl group was 97%. 
     SYNTHESIS OF POLYETHYLENEIMINE DERIVATIVE 4 
     Added to 500 parts by weight of a 30% aqueous solution of a polyethyleneimine having an average molecular weight of 1,200 were 1,400 parts by weight of a 10% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide. Carbon disulfide (265 parts by weight) were then reacted in a similar manner to the foregoing syntheses, whereby Polyethyeleneimine Derivative 4 was obtained. The rate of substitution by the dithiocarboxyl group was 99%. 
     SYNTHESIS OF POLYETHYLENEIMINE DERIVATIVE 5 
     Added to 500 parts by weight of 30% aqueous solution of a polyethyeleneimine having an average molecule weight of 3,500 were 1,120 parts by weight of a 10% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide. Carbon disulfide (212 parts by weight) was then reacted in a similar manner to the foregoing synthesis, whereby Polyethyleneimine Derivative 5 was obtained. The rate of substitution by the dithiocarboxyl group was 80%. 
     SYNTHESIS OF POLYETHYLENEIMINE DERIVATIVE 6 
     Added to 500 parts by weight of a 30% aqueous solution of a polyethyleneimine having an average molecular weight of 40,000 were 1,400 parts by weight of a 10% aqueous solution of a sodium hydroxide. Carbon disulfide (265 parts by weight) was then reacted in a similar manner to the foregoing synthesis, whereby Polyethyleneimine Derivative 6 was obtained. The rate of substitution by the dithiocarboxyl group was 99%. 
     SYNTHESIS OF POLYETHYLENEIMINE DERIVATIVE 7 
     Added to 500 parts by weight of a 30% aqueous solution of a polyethyleneimine having an average molecular weight of 7,800 were 1,400 parts by weight of a 10% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide. Carbon disulfide (265 parts by weight) was then reacted in a similar manner to the foregoing synthesis, whereby Polyethyleneimine Derivative 7 was obtained. The rate of substitution by the dithiocarboxyl group was 99%. 
     SYNTHESIS OF POLYETHYLENEIMINE DERIVATIVE 8 
     Added to 500 parts by weight of a 30% aqueous solution of a polyethyleneimine having an average molecular weight of 70,000 were 1,050 parts by weight of a 4% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide. Carbon disulfide (79.5 parts by weight) were then reacted in a similar manner to the foregoing syntheses, whereby Polyethyleneimine Derivative 8 was obtained. The rate of substitution by the dithiocarboxyl group was 30%. 
     SYNTHESIS OF POLYAMINE DERIVATIVE 1 
     Charged in a four-neck flask were 40 g of ethylenediamine (molecular weight: 60) and 536 g of a 20% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide. At 40° C., 203.7 g of carbon disulfide were added dropwise under vigorous agitation through a dropping funnel. After completion of the dropwise addition, aging was conducted for 4 hours at the same temperature so that Polyamine Derivative 1 was obtained. The rate of substitution by the dithiocarboxyl group was 100%. 
     SYNTHESIS OF POLYAMINE DERIVATIVE 2 
     Charged in a similar apparatus were 101 g of triethylenetetramine (molecular weight: 146) and 464 g of a 20% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide. Carbon disulfide (176.3 g) was reacted in a manner similar to the above synthesis of Polyamine Derivative 1, whereby Polyamine Derivative 2 was obtained. The rate of substitution by the dithiocarboxyl group was 56%. 
     SYNTHESIS OF POLYAMINE DERIVATIVE 3 
     Charged in a similar apparatus were 48.5 of diethylenetriamine (molecular weight: 103) and 384 g of water. The resultant mixture was heated to 60° C., followed by the addition of 145.9 g of carbon disulfide through a dropping funnel. After completion of the dropwise addition, aging was conducted for 4 hours at the same temperature. The reaction mixture was then heated to 70-75° C. followed the addition of 384 g of a 20% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide. They were reacted for 1.5 hours, whereby Polyamine Derivative 3 was obtained. The rate of substitution by the dithiocarboxyl group was 82%. 
     SYNTHESIS OF POLYAMINE DERIVATIVE 4 
     Charged were 90.2 g of N-propyltriethylenetetramine (molecular weight: 188) and 640 g of a 15% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide. Carbon disulfide (172.8 g) was reacted in a manner similar to the synthesis of Polyamine Derivative 1, whereby Polyamine Derivative 4 was obtained. The rate of substitution by the dithiocarboxyl group was 95%. 
     SYNTHESIS OF POLYAMINE DERIVATIVE 5 
     Charged were 91.5 g of β-hydroxypropylpentaethylenehexamine (molecular weight: 290) and 296 g of a 20% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide. Carbon disulfide (112.5 g) was reacted in a manner similar to the synthesis of Polyamine Derivative 1, whereby Polyamine Derivative 5 was obtained. The rate of substitution by the dithiocarboxyl group was 78%. 
     SYNTHESIS OF POLYAMINE DERIVATIVE 6 
     Charged were 44 g of β-hydroxyalkyl (C 10  -C 12 ) pentaethylenehexamine (molecular weight: 437) and 536 g of a 3.7% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide. Carbon disulfide (38 g) was reacted in a similar manner to the synthesis of Polyamine Derivative 1, whereby Polyamine Derivative 6 was obtained. The rate of substitution by the dithiocarboxyl group was 70%. 
     SYNTHESIS OF POLYAMINE DERIVATIVE 7 
     Charged were 154 g of a reaction product (molecular weight: 642) obtained by reacting pentaethylenehexamine with 1,2-epoxyalkane (C 10  -C 12 ) and 1,200 g of a 4% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide. Carbon disulfide (91.2 9) was reacted in a manner similar to the synthesis of Polyamine Derivative 1, whereby Polyamine Derivative 7 was obtained. The rate of substitution by the dithiocarboxyl group was 83%. 
     SYNTHESIS OF POLYAMINE DERIVATIVE 8 
     Charged in a similar apparatus were 30 g of ethylenediamine (molecular weight: 60) and 810 g of a 2.5% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide. Carbon disulfide (38 g) was reacted in a manner similar to the above Synthesis of Polyamine Derivative 1, whereby Polyamine Derivative 8 was obtained. The rate of substitution by the dithiocarboxyl group was 25%. 
     Four kinds of aqueous solutions were treated using metal scavengers which were obtained by mixing the above-obtained polyethyleneimine derivative and polyamine derivative and if necessary, sodium sulfides in the proportions given below (all solid wt %). Note that Polyethyleneimine Derivative 2 and Polyethylene Derivative 1 were used singly in Comparative Examples 1 and 2, respectively. 
     
         ______________________________________COMPOSITIONS OF METAL SCAVENGERS           Rate of           Substitution    Mixing           of dithio-           carboxyl        Ratio           group (%)                   MW      (wt %)______________________________________Example 1Polyethyleneimine Derivative 3             97        100,000 1.3Polyamine Derivative 1             100       60      8.7Example 2Polyethyleneimine Derivative 2             80        70,000  2.8Polyamine Derivative 2             56        146     7.2Example 3Polyethyleneimine Derivative 1             43        10,000  2Polyamine Derivative 3             82        103     8Example 4Polyethyleneimine Derivative 2             80        70,000  1.5Polyamine Derivative 4             95        188     8.5Example 5Polyethyleneimine Derivative 3             97        100,000 2.5Polyamine Derivative 5             78        290     7.5Example 6Metal Scavenger of Example 1        8.0Sodium monosulfide                  2.0Example 7Metal Scavenger of Example 3        9.0Sodium pentasulfide                 1.0Example 8Metal Scavenger of Example 5        8.5Sodium hydrogensulfide              1.5Example 9Polyethyleneimine Derivative 7             99        7,800   1.2Polyamine Derivative 6             70        437     8.8Example 10Polyethyleneimine Derivative 6             99        40,000  1.8Polyamine Derivative 6             70        437     8.2Example 11Polyethyleneimine Derivative 7             99        7,800   2.3Polyamine Derivative 4             95        188     7.7Example 12Polyethyleneimine Derivative 6             99        40,000  2.6Polyamine Derivative 4             95        188     7.4Comparative Example 1Polyethyleneimine Derivative 2(80% substitutions, MW = 70,000) was used singly.Comparative Example 2Polyamine Derivative 1(100% substitutions, MW = 60) was used singly.Comparative Example 3Polyethyleneimine Derivative 4             99        1,200   1.3Polyamine Derivative 1             100       60      8.7Comparative Example 4Metal Scavenger of Comp. Ex. 3      8.0Sodium monosulfide                  2.0Comparative Example 5Polyethyleneimine Derivative 5             90        3,500   2.1Polyamine Derivative 5             78        290     7.9Comparative Example 6Polyethyleneimine Derivative 5             80        3,500   1.6Polyamine Derivative 2             56        146     8.4Comparative Example 7Polyethyleneimine Derivative 1             43        10,000  2.0Polyamine Derivative 7             83        642     8.0Comparative Example 8Polyethyleneimine Derivative 5             80        3,500   2.0Polyamine Derivative 7             83        642     8.0Comparative Example 9Polyethyleneimine Derivative 1             43        10,000  2.0Polyamine Derivative 8             25        60      8.0Comparative Example 10Polyethyleneimine Derivative 8             30        70,000  1.5Polyamine Derivative 2             56        146     8.5Comparative Example 11Polyethyleneimine Derivative 3             97        100,000 0.5Polyamine Derivative 1             100       60      9.5Comparative Example 12Polyethyleneimine Derivative 7             99        7,800   0.5Polyamine Derivative 6             70        43      9.5Comparative Example 13Polyethyleneimine Derivative 2             80        70,000  4.0Polyamine Derivative 4             95        188     6.0Comparative Example 14Polyethyleneimine Derivative 3             97        100,000 4.0Polyamine Derivative 1             100       60      6.0Comparative Example 15Polyethyleneimine Derivative 8             30        70,000  2.0Polyamine Derivative 8             25        60      8.0Comparative Example 16Polyethyleneimine Derivative 3             97        100,000 1.3Polyamine Derivative 8             25        60      8.7Comparative Example 17Polyethyleneimine Derivative 8             30        70,000  2.8Polyamine Derivative 2             56        146     7.2______________________________________ 
    
     The aqueous solutions provided for the treatment were an aqueous nickel solution [content of nickel, (II) ions: 50 ppm, pH: 6.8], an aqueous manganese solution [content of manganese (II) ions: 50 ppm, pH: 5.6], an aqueous cobalt solution [content of cobalt (II) ions: 50 ppm, pH: 4.6], and an aqueous chromium solution [content of chromium (III) ions: 50 ppm, pH: 4.0]. 
     Treatment was conducted in the following manner. One liter portions of each of the aqueous solutions to be treated were respectively added with 70 mg of the metal scavengers (as mixtures of the metal scavengers and the corresponding sodium sulfides in Examples 6, 7 and 8 and Comparative Example 4). Each of the resultant mixturse was stirred for 5 minutes and then left over. The time until sedimentation of formed sedimentation was measured. After the floc thus formed was filtered off, the concentrations of metal ions remaining in the filtrate were measured by atomic absorption spectrometry. The measurement results of floc sedimentation time, the quantity of the floc formed, the water content of cake formed as a result of collection of the floc by filtration and the concentration of metal ions remaining in the filtrate are summarized in Tables I, II and III. Table III shows the eluted amount of metal. The elution test was performed in accordance with the method of notification No. 13 of the Environmental Agency, the Government of Japan, incorporated herein by reference thereto. The water content of the cake is shown by expressing, in terms of wt %, the amount of evaporated water as measured by the infrared irradiation method. 
     
                                           TABLE I__________________________________________________________________________  Floc sedimentation time (min)                      Quantity of floc formed (ml)  Aqueous       Aqueous            Aqueous                 Aqueous                      Aqueous                           Aqueous                                Aqueous                                     Aqueous  Mn (II)       Ni (II)            Co (II)                 Cr (III)                      Mn (II)                           Ni (II)                                Co (II)                                     Cr (III)EXAMPLE  soln.       soln.            soln.                 soln.                      soln.                           soln.                                soln.                                     soln.1      22   28   23   25   36   37   35   302      25   29   26   27   35   38   36   323      29   31   29   31   38   38   34   334      24   29   25   26   37   39   38   345      21   28   23   24   35   36   39   286      24   29   26   28   34   37   36   277      22   27   24   24   36   36   36   298      23   28   25   26   35   35   37   309      23   31   24   24   37   35   36   3310     26   29   25   27   39   37   38   3611     22   27   23   24   36   38   37   3112     24   28   26   29   36   35   35   32__________________________________________________________________________                      Remaining metal ion concentration (ppm)                      Aqueous                           Aqueous                                Aqueous                                     Aqueous  Water content of cake (%)                      Mn (II)                           Ni (II)                                Co (II)                                     Cr (III)EXAMPLE  Mn (II)       Ni (II)            Co (II)                 Cr (III)                      soln.                           soln.                                soln.                                     soln.__________________________________________________________________________1      80   79   78   80   1.0  2.5  1.4  2.12      77   79   81   79   2.3  3.3  2.6  2.83      80   81   79   80   1.8  2.4  2.0  2.24      78   79   78   79   1.4  2.5  2.1  2.35      77   78   79   77   0.9  1.8  1.3  1.46      79   77   77   80   1.1  2.4  1.4  2.17      79   81   79   79   0.9  2.2  1.2  2.08      76   77   79   78   1.0  2.5  1.3  1.99      80   79   80   81   1.2  2.5  1.8  2.210     78   80   79   79   1.0  2.4  1.2  2.311     79   80   79   81   1.4  2.2  2.2  2.212     77   79   78   80   1.5  2.5  2.3  2.4__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
     
                                           TABLE II__________________________________________________________________________     Floc sedimentation time (min)                         Quantity of floc formed (ml)     Aqueous          Aqueous               Aqueous                    Aqueous                         Aqueous                              Aqueous                                   Aqueous                                        AqueousCOMPARATIVE     Mn (II)          Ni (II)               Co (II)                    Cr (III)                         Mn (II)                              Ni (II)                                   Co (II)                                        Cr (III)EXAMPLE   soln.          soln.               soln.                    soln.                         soln.                              soln.                                   soln.                                        soln.__________________________________________________________________________ 1        40   42   41   39   80   82   81   80 2        45   48   49   44   85   88   87   84 3        42   44   44   42   83   84   83   82 4        35   33   36   35   51   52   51   50 5        39   41   40   44   51   53   50   52 6        43   40   39   42   57   61   56   59 7        45   50   49   42   85   88   86   83 8        47   51   53   46   86   89   87   85 9        68   62   64   61   52   54   53   5110        66   58   60   57   47   50   48   4911        30   33   33   30   42   44   41   3912        31   38   30   29   45   47   48   4213        26   31   28   29   41   42   41   3914        29   33   29   31   44   46   43   4015        65   54   57   55   55   59   53   5816        67   61   64   62   53   53   51   4917        67   59   59   60   49   51   49   52__________________________________________________________________________                         Remaining metal ion concentration (ppm)                         Aqueous                              Aqueous                                   Aqueous                                        AqueousComparative     Water content of cake (%)                         Mn (II)                              Ni (II)                                   Co (II)                                        Cr (III)COMPARATIVEEXAMPLE   Mn (II)          Ni (II)               Co (II)                    Cr (III)                         soln.                              soln.                                   soln.                                        soln.__________________________________________________________________________ 1        93   92   93   91   3.2  6.3  4.4  4.8 2        93   94   94   92   4.5  10.2 9.8  8.3 3        91   92   91   93   3.2  5.8  4.4  4.9 4        86   89   87   89   2.9  4.2  3.0  3.3 5        85   87   89   86   2.1  3.9  3.2  3.4 6        86   91   87   87   2.2  3.6  2.9  3.5 7        86   89   86   88   3.3  6.4  5.0  5.2 8        88   91   89   91   4.1  10.0 9.2  8.6 9        93   94   92   90   10.1 10.4 12.4 10.210        93   92   93   91   12.1 11.6 14.3 11.811        85   83   82   84   1.1  2.8  1.6  2.312        82   84   85   86   1.4  2.9  2.1  2.913        90   89   90   90   1.5  2.7  2.3  2.614        85   84   84   86   1.4  2.9  1.8  2.915        92   92   95   94   16.3 15.4 19.2 17.416        90   91   89   87   9.2  8.6  10.1 8.117        93   93   92   91   11.2 10.4 12.6 9.8__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
     
                       TABLE III______________________________________     ELUTED AMOUNT OF METAL     (ppm)     Mn   Ni           Co    Cr______________________________________EXAMPLE1           0.9    1.0          0.9 0.22           2.0    1.3          1.4 0.33           1.6    0.9          1.2 0.24           1.2    1.0          1.2 0.35           0.6    0.7          0.8 0.16           1.1    1.7          1.4 0.57           0.9    1.5          1.2 0.48           0.9    2.0          0.9 0.29           1.3    1.0          1.1 0.210          0.9    1.2          0.8 0.311          1.5    2.0          1.1 0.212          1.5    1.8          1.4 0.4COMPARATIVEEXAMPLE1           1.8    1.9          1.4 0.62           4.2    5.6          6.5 2.33           4.0    3.5          2.3 1.94           3.1    4.1          2.5 2.45           2.4    3.9          2.8 0.56           2.3    2.4          2.3 0.67           2.9    4.2          4.3 1.38           4.0    5.1          5.6 1.69           10.3   8.2          7.3 3.910          9.4    7.6          6.9 3.211          3.5    4.5          5.1 1.612          3.4    4.2          4.4 1.013          1.8    1.4          2.0 0.914          1.1    1.2          1.2 0.415          13.2   10.4         7.3 5.416          9.9    8.0          7.0 3.717          9.1    7.2          6.5 3.0______________________________________ 
    
     
                       TABLE IV______________________________________                       BulkEluted amount of metal (ppm)                       densityPb         Cd     Zn     Cr   Hg   Cu   Ni  (g/cm.sup.3)______________________________________Example 13   0.20   ND*    0.31 0.10 ND   ND   0.1 1.0Untreated   50.3   0.25   15.3 0.45 0.06 0.09 1.4 0.3fly ash______________________________________ 
    
     EXAMPLE 13 
     To 50 g of fly ash produced by incineration of waste and containing 950 ppm of lead, 125 ppm of cadmium, 5300 ppm of zinc, 130 ppm of entire chromium, 13 ppm of mercury, 160 ppm of copper and 4 ppm of nickel, 1 g of the same metal scavenger as that employed in Example 2 were added as an aqueous solution in 10 g of water. The resultant mass was kneaded thoroughly at 65-70° C. for 20 minutes. With respect to the ash thus kneaded and treated and allowed to cool down to room temperature and the untreated ash, elution tests were conducted in the manner set out in Notification No. 13 of the Environment Agency, the Government of Japan. The amounts of metal eluted and the bulk densities of the ash samples both before and after the treatment were measured. The results are shown in Table IV. 
     EXAMPLE 14 
     To 50 g of sludge (water content: 82%) obtained by treatment of waste water from a waste incineration plant and containing 25 ppm of mercury, 108 ppm of lead, 2 ppm of cadmium, 160 ppm of zinc and 3 ppm of nickel, 0.1 g of the same metal scavenger as that employed in Example 1 was added. The resultant mixture was mixed thoroughly for 20 minutes, followed by filtration. The concentrations of metals in the resultant filtrate were measured. The filtrate was found to contain 0.002 ppm of mercury and 0.3 ppm of lead, but cadmium, nickel and zinc were not detected. 
     COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 18 
     Polyethyleneimine derivative 2 (0.1 g) was added to 50 g of the same sludge as that treated in Example 14, followed by thorough mixing for 20 minutes. The resultant mixture was filtered and the concentrations of metals in the filtrate were measured. The filtrate was found to contain 0.03 ppm of mercury, 1.2 ppm of lead, 0.5 ppm of cadmium, 20 ppm of zinc, and 2 ppm of nickel. 
     EXAMPLE 15 
     To 50 g of slag containing, as metals, 0,014 ppm of mercury, 330 ppm of cadmium, 220 ppm of lead, 0.7 ppm of chromium and 100 ppm of copper, 0.5 g of the same metal scavenger as that employed in Example 5 was added as an aqueous solution in 5 g of water. The resultant mass was kneaded thoroughly for 20 minutes. With respect to the slag thus kneaded and treated, an elution test was conducted to measure the amount of metals eluted. As a result, detected were 0.001 ppm of mercury, 0.1 ppm of cadmium, 0.2 ppm of lead and 0.3 ppm of copper. Chromium was not detected.