Abstract:
Reaction products which provide antioxidant properties to lubricants and fuels while serving as effective dispersants and detergents in these mediums. These products, of the reaction of a hydroxyalkylene substituted polyamines and substituted succinic anhydrides, contain mixtures of esters, amides and imides. Furthermore, preferred embodiments of the reaction products have pendent alcohol groups which provide extra dispersancy and detergency over traditional dispersants which typically do not have alcohol groups.

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention is directed to modified polyamines, and more particularly, to the products of reactions in which substituted succinic anhydrides are reacted with hydroxyalkylene substituted polyamines. 
     Detergents and dispersants containing modified polyamines are known in the art. It has also been known to react polyamines with alkyl succinic anhydrides. The reaction products of polyamines and alkyl succinic anhydrides, however, typically display the characteristics of pro-oxidants. 
     In light of the disadvantages caused by the oxidizing characteristics of known detergents and dispersants, e.g. oil degradation, anti-oxidant depletion, potential sludge formation, it would be beneficial to provide detergents and dispersants for lubricants and fuels which provide antioxidant properties. It would be further beneficial to provide products which give extra dispersancy and detergency over traditional compounds known in the art. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention provides reaction products which, when used as additives, advantageously provide antioxidant properties to lubricants and fuels while serving as effective dispersants and detergents in these mediums. The reaction products of the present invention are obtained from the reaction of hydroxyalkylene substituted polyamines and substituted succinic anhydrides. The reaction products contain mixtures of esters, amides and imides. Furthermore, the reaction products will frequently have pendent alcohol groups which provide extra dispersancy and detergency over traditional dispersants which typically do not have alcohol groups. 
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     The present invention comprises novel reaction products and the use of the reaction products as additives for lubricants and fuels which advantageously provide antioxidant properties to those materials while serving as an effective dispersant and detergent. In accordance with a first step of the present invention, long chain epoxides are reacted with polyamines to form a hydroxyalkylated polyamine. For example, a polyamine such as a poly(ethylene amine) may be reacted with a long chain epoxide in accordance with the general formula: ##STR1## where R═C 4  to about C 200  hydrocarbyl, y=1 to (x+4), x=0 to 4, a+b+c=y, d+e+f=(x+4)-y, a+d=2, b+e=1, and c+f=2. 
     The present invention is not limited to poly(ethylene amines) such as ethylene diamine, diethylene triamine, triethylene tetramine, tetraethylene pentamine, and pentethylene hexamine. Other polyamines such as poly(propylene amines) and other amines which contain at least two nitrogens, at least one of which is primary or secondary, may be used. Another suitable example is tris(2-amino ethyl) amine. 
     The reactants are heated to about 100° C. to about 250° C. and preferably to about 150° C. to about 200° C., in a reactor with an N 2  purge for about 1 to about 24 hrs., and preferably for about 3 hrs. to about 10 hrs., most preferably until all of the starting epoxide has reacted. During this reaction, the reactants are typically kept at ambient pressures but slightly higher or lower pressures can also be used. The product of this reaction is a hydroxyalkylene substituted polyamine having at least one of the following radical: ##STR2## 
     After optional cooling, the substituted polyamines are then reacted with substituted succinic anhydrides, for example polyisobutenyl succinic anhydrides (PBSA&#39;s). In the presence of an inert solvent such as toluene or xylene, these reactants are preferably heated to reflux, for example, to a temperature of about 100° C. to about 150° C., for about 3 hrs. to about 10 hrs., preferably until none of the starting succinic anhydride remains. During this reaction, the reactants are typically kept at ambient pressures but slightly higher or lower pressures can also be used. The ratio of PBSA to substituted polyamine can be from about 1:1 to about x+4:1. Depending on the various ratios used, the reaction products contain various combinations of esters, amides, and imides. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that many of the reaction products of the present invention will advantageously have pendent alcohol groups. If, however, for example, y=x+4 and the ratio of PBSAs to substituted polyamine is greater than y/2, then no alcohol groups will theoretically be present. The pendent alcohol groups are desirable in that they enhance the dispersancy and detergency of the lubricants and fuels to which the reaction products are added. Those skilled in the art will also appreciate that these reaction products may require the removal of solvents and/or filtration prior to their use as additives. 
     The products of this invention can be added to lubricants, for example, at about 0.1% to about 10% by weight and to fuels such as hydrocarbon fuels, oxygen-containing fuels or mixtures thereof, for example, at about 25 lbs. to about 500 lbs. of additive per 1000 barrels of fuel. 
    
    
     While the additives of the present invention can be obtained by the reaction of different compounds within the above-referenced classes of compounds, the following examples further illustrate the present invention. 
     EXAMPLE 1 
     56.7 gm (0.3 mol) of TEPA (tetraethylene pentamine) and 300 ml of xylenes were charged to a 2 liter reactor equipped with an N 2  inlet, mechanical stirrer, thermometer, and Dean Stark trap. The mixture was heated to reflux for 2 hrs. with an N 2  purge. Less than 0.5 ml water was collected. The reaction was allowed to cool to room temperature and then 338.4 gm (1.2 mol) 1,2-epoxyoctadecane was added. The reaction was heated to 175° C. by removing the xylenes through the Dean Stark trap. TLC after 3.5 hr. showed that all of the 1,2-epoxyoctadecane had reacted. The reaction was stripped under house vacuum (ca. 250-300 mmHg) at 150° C. until no more xylenes distilled. The resulting tan liquid solidified into a waxy solid upon cooling. 
     EXAMPLE 2 
     The procedure of Example 1 was followed with the following exception: the molar ratio of TEPA to 1,2-epoxyoctadecane utilized was 1:2. 
     EXAMPLE 3 
     The procedure of Example 1 was followed with the following exception: the molar ratio of TEPA to 1,2-epoxyoctadecane was changed to 1:3. 
     EXAMPLE 4 
     The procedure of Example 1 was followed with the following exception: the molar ratio of TEPA to 1,2-epoxyoctadecane was changed to 1:6. 
     EXAMPLE 5 
     65.8 gm (0.45 mol) of tris(2-aminoethyl)amine and 300 ml of xylenes were charged to a 2 liter reactor equipped with an N 2  inlet, mechanical stirrer, thermometer, and Dean Stark trap. The mixture was heated to reflux for 2 hr. with an N 2  purge. 0.2 ml of water was collected. Thereaction was allowed to cool to room temperature and 380.7 gm (1.35 mol) 1,2-epoxyoctadecane was added. The reaction was heated to 175° C. by removing xylenes through the Dean Stark trap. TLC after 5 hrs. showed that all of the 1,2-epoxyoctadecane had reacted. The reaction was strippedunder house vacuum (ca. 250-300 mmHg) at 150° C. until no more xylenes distilled. The resulting tan liquid solidified into a waxy solid upon cooling. 
     EXAMPLE 6 
     The procedure described in Example 5 was followed with the following exception: the molar ratio of tris(2-aminoethyl)amine to 1,2-epoxyoctadecane was changed to 1:2. 
     EXAMPLE 7 
     46.1 gm (0.035 mol) of the product from Example 1, 34.7 gm (0.035 mol) of apolyisobutenyl succinic anhydride made from maleic anhydride and 920 MW polyisobutylene, and 100 ml of toluene were charged to a 500 ml reactor equipped with an N 2  inlet, mechanical stirrer, thermometer, and Dean Stark trap. The mixture was heated to reflux for six hours during which time 0.15 ml water was collected and no IR peaks for the starting succinicanhydride remained. The reaction was stripped of solvent via rotary evaporation and filtered through celite. The caramel colored liquid solidified into a waxy solid upon cooling. 
     EXAMPLE 8 
     The procedure of Example 7 was followed with the following exception: the molar ratio of substituted polyamine to PBSA was changed to 1:2. 
     EXAMPLE 9 
     The procedure of Example 7 was followed with the following exception: the PBSA used was the reaction product of maleic anhydride and 460 MW polyisobutylene. 
     EXAMPLE 10 
     The procedure of Example 7 was followed with the following exception: the product from Example 2 was used instead of the product from Example 1. 
     EXAMPLE 11 
     The procedure of Example 8 was followed with the following exception: the product from Example 2 was used instead of the product from Example 1. 
     EXAMPLE 12 
     The procedure of Example 9 was followed with the following exception: the product from Example 2 was used instead of the product from Example 1. 
     EXAMPLE 13 
     The procedure of Example 7 was followed with the following exception: the product from Example 3 was used instead of the product from Example 1. 
     EXAMPLE 14 
     The procedure of Example 9 was followed with the following exception: the product from Example 4 was used instead of the product from Example 1. 
     EXAMPLE 15 
     The procedure of Example 7 was followed with the following exception: the product from Example 5 was used instead of the product from Example 1. 
     EXAMPLE 16 
     The procedure of Example 8 was followed with the following exception: the product from Example 5 was used instead of the product from Example 1. 
     EXAMPLE 17 
     The procedure of Example 7 was followed with the following exception: the product from Example 6 was used instead of the product from Example 1. 
     EXAMPLE 18 
     The procedure of Example 8 was followed with the following exception: the product from Example 6 was used instead of the product from Example 1. 
     EXAMPLE 19 
     103.2 gm (1.0 mol) of diethylene triamine was charged to a 500 ml reactor equipped with an N 2  inlet, thermometer, mechanical stirrer, and addition funnel charged with 382.1 gm (5.3 mol) of butylene oxide. The reaction was heated to 110° C. and the butylene oxide was added dropwise over 2 hours. External heating was discontinued and a cooling bath was added about half way through the addition to control the exotherm. The reaction was heated at 110° C. for an additional hourafter the addition was complete. It was then stripped via rotary evaporation and was filtered through a bed of celite. The resulting product was clear, orange, viscous liquid. 
     EXAMPLE 20 
     The procedure of Example 7 was followed with the following exception: the product from Example 19 was substituted for the product from Example 1. 
     Oxidation Evaluation 
     The following examples show the surprising antioxidant capabilities of these additives at a 1% level in a neutral base stock. 
     
         ______________________________________B-10 Catalytic Oxidation Test325° F., 40 HoursAdditive         ΔNN                   % ΔKV______________________________________None             12.1   141.5Example 7         1.0    2.2______________________________________ 
    
     The samples were tested using Mobil&#39;s B10 procedure as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,715,974. 
     In order to confirm the advantages of the present invention and the importance of the order of reactions, a sample from U.S. Pat. No. 3,373,111 was synthesized and compared to one of the examples described above. The samples were tested at a level of 4% by weight in a formulated marine lubricant minus its usual ashless dispersant. The fully formulated oil is also included in the table below. The samples were tested using Mobil&#39;s B10 procedure as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,715,974. 
     
         ______________________________________             % ΔKV                      ΔNN______________________________________Ex. 4 from 3,373,111             53       7.0Ex. 7             46       4.3Marine Lubricant  80       7.6______________________________________ 
    
     This comparison indicates that the present invention provides both better control of acid number and kinematic viscosity than the sample from U.S. Pat. No. 3,373,111.