Abstract:
A method of analyzing a distribution of fault elements is applied to a semiconductor integrated circuit including a plurality of elements which are repeatedly arranged in a pitch of one length unit in a specific direction. The method is accomplished by generating a position of each of fault elements in the semiconductor integrated circuit, and by performing a first determination of whether an appearance expectation function value is larger than a reference value, for each of divisors of the number of length units between fault elements, the number of length units being larger than one length unit. Also, the method is accomplished by performing a second determination of whether a distribution of the fault elements includes a regular distribution, based on the appearance expectation function value and a reference value, and by representing the determining result of the second determination.

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     The present invention relates to a fault distribution analyzing system which analyzes a distribution of fault elements of a semiconductor integrated circuit in which circuit elements are arranged regularly. 
     2. Description of the Related Art 
     When a semiconductor integrated circuit has regularly arranged circuit elements and a distribution of fault circuit elements contained in the semiconductor integrated circuit is analyzed, the distribution of fault elements can be visually grasped if the positions of the fault elements are recorded. For example, when the circuit elements are divided into blocks and all of the circuit elements contained in one of the blocks are in failure, the block can be determined to be fault. When two adjacent circuit elements are in failure, the 2-bit pair can be determined to be in failure. Also, when one circuit element is independently in failure, the bit can be determined to be in failure. Moreover, when the neighbor elements are in failure massively, a bit group can be determined to be in failure. 
     The analysis of the distribution of fault elements is called a bit map analysis. The analysis is especially effective when the distribution of fault elements contained in a semiconductor integrated circuit such as a memory LSI or a memory mounting type logic LSI is analyzed. However, the number of elements contained in one semiconductor integrated circuit reaches 10,000,000 or more with the high integration of the semiconductor integrated circuit in recent years. For this reason, it is difficult for an operator to carry out the whole analysis of the distribution of fault elements based on the bit map analysis. Therefore, the technique for automatically analyzing the distribution of fault elements contained in the semiconductor integrated circuit is proposed in Japanese Laid Open Patent Application (JP-A-showa 61-23327) and Japanese Laid Open Patent Application (JP-A-Heisei 1-216278). 
     However, there are the following problems in the above-mentioned conventional examples of fault distribution analyzing apparatus. 
     First, it is difficult to determine whether fault elements distributed in a low density in a wide area over the whole semiconductor integrated circuit shows an irregular distribution or is contained in a regular distribution. Generally, when an analysis technical expert analyzes the distribution of fault elements contained in the semiconductor integrated circuit, the analysis technical expert observes the whole distribution at a low magnification and determines an area with a high fault element density. Then, the analysis technical expert observes the determined area at a high magnification and determines a correct position of the fault element and the regularity of the distribution of fault elements. However, when the fault elements are distributed in a low density in the wide area, the observation area at the high magnification gets wide. Therefore, the analysis by the analysis technical expert is difficult actually. 
     Second, it is difficult to find the period of the regularity, even when the regularity is discovered in the distribution of fault elements. The reason is that even if a position coordinate frequency distribution of fault elements is determined, the position coordinate range is wide so that the number of fault elements for position coordinate is 1 or a few. Also, this is because the distribution of the fault elements is low in density and is wide in area. In this way, it is difficult to correctly determine the period of the distributions of fault elements. 
     Third, there is another problem that the distribution of fault elements cannot be stored in the storage and correctly searched by a computer. That is, when the position coordinate of each fault element is to be searched, the number of fault element increases so that the data to be stored has become enormous in case of a semiconductor integrated circuit of a high integration. For this reason, because a storage unit had been saturated at a short time, the conventional fault distribution analyzing apparatus cannot be used in practical use. 
     On the other hand, a system searching the ratio of the number of fault elements and all the elements is known. However, in this system, a spatial distribution of fault elements cannot be represented, because the system does not contain the data indicative of the position coordinate of the fault element. 
     Moreover, a system is known which uses a histogram in which the number of fault elements is counted in accordance with the position coordinate. However, there are not distributions in which histograms are completely coincident with each other. Also, the pattern of the histogram becomes different in accordance with the increase of elements in a semiconductor integrated circuit. Therefore, it is difficult to search the histogram having the same pattern. 
     In conjunction with the above description, method of manufacturing an integrated circuit is disclosed in Japanese Examined Patent application (JP-B-Heisei 5-77178). This reference is directed to a method of manufacturing an integrated circuit which sometimes possibly contains any fault on a manufacturing process. The fault cannot be visually detected or requires an excessive long visual test for the detection. In this reference, a data base is produced to show a response which is caused by a specific fault of a type in response to a series of electric test signals. The series of electric test signals are applied to a manufactured integrated circuit. When any fault is detected, the manufacturing condition is examined so as to clearly specify the fault. Thus, the fault is avoided. 
     Also, a fault analyzing system of a semiconductor circuit is disclosed in Japanese Laid Open Patent Application (JP-A-Heisei 7-221156). In this reference, the fault analyzing system (101) carries out analysis based on a data obtained through an alien substance test (102) and an outward appearance test (103) in a manufacturing process (111), a data obtained through a final wafer test (112) and a data obtained through a fail bit (FB) analysis system (105). The fail bit analysis system (105) extracts a fault position and a fault inducing position from a distribution of fail bits, using the data obtained through the final wafer test (112) and an LSI design data (107). Then, the fail bit analysis system (105) refers to a fault cause now-how data (108) to carry out estimation (113) of a fault cause. An observing unit (109) observes the fault position and the fault inducing position transferred from the fail bit analysis system (105) to specify the fault cause and a fault process. An analysis unit (110) carries out analysis of composition of an alien substance detected by the observing unit (109) to specify the fault cause and the fault process. 
     Also, a method of detecting and estimating a dot pattern is disclosed in Japanese Laid Open Patent Application (JP-A-Heisei 9-270012). In this reference, a dot pattern is spatially and discretely in a multi-dimensional coordinate system. Each of dots of the pattern takes either of two identifiable states. A measuring unit records a coordinate value and the state value of each dot of the dot pattern. A memory of a computer stores data corresponding to the coordinate value and state value of each dot. Coordinate counters are determined based on the stored data. A n-dimensional vector composed of components formed of the values of the determined coordinate counters is inputted to a neuron circuit network. The neuron circuit network compare the inputted vector and a reference vector corresponding to a reference dot pattern to calculate an output vector. A classification data of the measured dot pattern is outputted based on the output vector. 
     Also, a pattern test method is disclosed in Japanese Laid Open Patent Application (JP-A-Heisei 10-89931). In this reference, a concerned point (101) and comparison points (102 a  to 102 d ) distanced from the concerned point by a repetition pitch are cross-compared to extract comparison points having any difference as fault candidates. Thus, points having 2-dimensional, X-direction or Y-direction repetition can be tested. Thus, a fault point is detected. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a method of analyzing a distribution of fault elements contained in a semiconductor integrated circuit, in which it is possible to analyze a distribution of fault elements contained in the semiconductor integrated circuit, a fault distribution analyzing system for the same, and a recording medium in which a program for executing the method is stored. 
     Another object of the present invention is to provide a method of analyzing a distribution of fault elements contained in a semiconductor integrated circuit, in which it is possible to easily determine whether or not a distribution of fault elements is an irregular distribution, a fault distribution analyzing system for the same, and a recording medium in which a program for executing the method is stored. 
     Still another object of the present invention is to provide a method of analyzing a distribution of fault elements contained in a semiconductor integrated circuit, in which it is possible to determine whether a distribution of fault elements contains a regular distribution, a fault distribution analyzing system for the same, and a recording medium in which a program for executing the method is stored. 
     Yet still another object of the present invention is to provide a method of analyzing a distribution of fault elements contained in a semiconductor integrated circuit, in which it is possible to determine a period in a regular distribution when a distribution of fault elements contains the regular distribution, a fault distribution analyzing system for the same, and a recording medium in which a program for executing the method is stored. 
     In order to achieve an aspect of the present invention, a method of analyzing a distribution of fault elements is applied to a semiconductor integrated circuit including a plurality of elements which are repeatedly arranged in a pitch of one length unit in a specific direction. The method is accomplished by generating a position of each of fault elements in the semiconductor integrated circuit, by performing a first determination of whether an appearance expectation function value is larger than a reference value, for each of divisors of the number of length units between fault elements, the number of length units being larger than one length unit, by performing a second determination of whether a distribution of the fault elements includes a regular distribution, based on the appearance expectation function value and a reference value, and by representing the determining result of the second determination. 
     Here, in the method, a third determination of a period of the fault elements in the regular distribution contained in the distribution of fault elements may be carried out based on the appearance expectation function values, and then the determined period of the fault elements may be represented. 
     Also, in the performing a second determination, a record of the appearance expectation function value for each of the divisors and a date and time data may be stored in a data base. In this case, data indicative of the distribution of fault elements is preferably stored in the data base in association with the record. Also, the data base may be searched in response to a search instruction with a target divisor to retrieve the appearance expectation function values for the target divisor and the date and time data corresponding to the appearance expectation function values, to represent the searched appearance expectation function values for the target divisor and the date and time data corresponding to the searched appearance expectation function values. 
     Also, a third determination of a period of the fault elements in the regular distribution contained in the distribution of fault elements may be performed based on the appearance expectation function values to store the determined period of the fault elements in the data base in addition to the record of the appearance expectation function value for each of the divisors and the date and time data. Also, in the performing a third determination, data indicative of the distribution of fault elements may be stored in the data base in association with the record and the determined period. In addition, the data base may be searched in response to a search instruction with a target divisor to retrieve the appearance expectation function values for the target divisor, the date and time data corresponding to the appearance expectation function values and the determined period of the fault elements, to represent the searched appearance expectation function values for the target divisor and the date and time data corresponding to the appearance expectation function values and the determined period of the fault elements. 
     The reference value is 1, the performing a first determination includes: 
     calculating an interval between optional two of all the fault elements contained in the semiconductor integrated circuit; 
     calculating the number of intervals other than 0, as a combination count; 
     calculating divisors of each of the intervals larger than 1, and for calculating an appearance probability for each of the divisors based on the number of times of appearance of each of the divisors and the combination count; and 
     calculating the appearance expectation function value for each of the divisors based on the corresponding one of the appearance probabilities and the each divisors. In this case, the calculating the appearance expectation function value may include multiplying each of the appearance probabilities with corresponding one of the divisors, to calculate the appearance expectation function value. 
     Also, the method may further include: 
     determining the largest one of the appearance expectation function values and the next largest one of the appearance expectation function values; 
     determining an absolute value of a difference between a first one of the divisors corresponding to the largest appearance expectation function value and a second one of the divisors corresponding to the next largest appearance expectation function value; and 
     determining a fact that the distribution of fault elements contains a regular distribution with a period based on the absolute value of the difference. In this case, the determining a fact includes: 
     determining a fact that the distribution of fault elements contains the regular distribution with the period having the first divisor, when the absolute value of the difference is equal to the first divisor. Also, the determining a fact includes: 
     determining a fact that the distribution of fault elements contains the regular distribution with the period, when the absolute value of the difference is not equal to the first divisor, but when the absolute value of the difference is within a predetermined value. 
     In order to achieve another aspect of the present invention, a fault distribution analyzing system of a semiconductor integrated circuit including a plurality of elements which are repeatedly arranged in a pitch of one length unit in a specific direction, includes an output unit, and an input unit and a first processor. The input unit supplies a position of each of fault elements in the semiconductor integrated circuit. The first processor determines whether an appearance expectation function value is larger than a reference value, for each of divisors of the number of length units between fault elements, the number of length units being larger than one length unit; determines that a distribution of the fault elements includes a regular distribution, when the appearance expectation function value is larger than the reference value; and outputs the determining result of the second determining means to the output unit. 
     The fault distribution analyzing system may further include a second processor which determines a period of the fault elements in the regular distribution contained in the distribution of fault elements based on the appearance expectation function values; and outputs the determined period of the fault elements to the output unit. In this case, the fault distribution analyzing system may further include a third processor which has a data base, and stores a record of the appearance expectation function value for each of the divisors and a date and time data in the data base. 
     In this case, the third processor stores data indicative of the distribution of fault elements in the data base in association with the record. Also, the third processor may search the data base in response to a search instruction with a target divisor to retrieve the appearance expectation function values for the target divisor and the date and time data corresponding to the appearance expectation function values; and outputs the searched appearance expectation function values for the target divisor and the date and time data corresponding to the searched appearance expectation function values to the output unit. 
     Also, the third processor may determine a period of the fault elements in the regular distribution contained in the distribution of fault elements based on the appearance expectation function values; and store the determined period of the fault elements in the data base in addition to the record of the appearance expectation function value for each of the divisors and the date and time data. In this case, the third processor stores data indicative of the distribution of fault elements in the data base in association with the record and the determined period. Also, the third processor may search the data base in response to a search instruction with a target divisor to retrieve the appearance expectation function values for the target divisor, the date and time data corresponding to the appearance expectation function values and the determined period of the fault elements; and outputs the searched appearance expectation function values for the target divisor and the date and time data corresponding to the appearance expectation function values and the determined period of the fault elements to the output unit. 
     Also, when the reference value is 1, the first processor may calculate an interval between optional two of all the fault elements contained in the semiconductor integrated circuit; calculate the number of intervals other than 0, as a combination count; calculate divisors of each of the intervals larger than 1, and for calculating an appearance probability for each of the divisors based on the number of times of appearance of each of the divisors and the combination count; and calculate the appearance expectation function value for each of the divisors based on the corresponding one of the appearance probabilities and the each divisors. In this case, the first processor multiplies each of the appearance probabilities with corresponding one of the divisors, to calculate the appearance expectation function value. 
     Also, the second processor may determine the largest one of the appearance expectation function values and the next largest one of the appearance expectation function values; determine an absolute value of a difference between a first one of the divisors corresponding to the largest appearance expectation function value and a second one of the divisors corresponding to the next largest appearance expectation function value; and determine that the distribution of fault elements contains a regular distribution with a period based on the absolute value of the difference. In this case, when the absolute value of the difference is equal to the first divisor, the second processor may determine that the distribution of fault elements contains the regular distribution with the period having the first divisor. Also, when the absolute value of the difference is not equal to the first divisor, but when the absolute value of the difference is within a predetermined value, the second processor may determine that the distribution of fault elements contains the regular distribution with the period. 
     In order to achieve still another aspect of the present invention, programs to execute the methods described in association with the aspect may be stored in a recording medium or recording media. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the structure of a fault distribution analyzing system of a semiconductor integrated circuit according to a first embodiment of the present invention; 
     FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing a process executed by the fault distribution analyzing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention; 
     FIG. 3 is a graph showing an example of the relation of expectation function values and corresponding divisors when a fault distribution shows irregular distribution; 
     FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of the irregular distribution; 
     FIG. 5 is a graph showing the analyzing result of the irregular distribution shown in FIG. 4 to the horizontal direction; 
     FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing the structure of the fault distribution analyzing system of the semiconductor integrated circuit according to a second embodiment of the present invention; 
     FIGS. 7 and 8 are flow charts showing the process of the fault distribution analyzing system according to the second embodiment of the present invention; 
     FIG. 9 is a graph showing expectation function values every divisor in a regular distribution having the period of λ=2 in case of determination of the period of the regular distribution; 
     FIG. 10 is a simplified graph of the graph shown in FIG. 9; 
     FIG. 11 is a graph showing expectation function values for every divisor in a regular distribution having the period of λ=3 in case of determination of the period of the regular distribution; 
     FIG. 12 is a graph showing expectation function values for every divisor in a regular distribution having the period of λ=5 in case of determination of the period of the regular distribution; 
     FIG. 13 is a graph showing expectation function values for every divisor in a regular distribution having the period of λ=10 in case of determination of the period of the regular distribution; 
     FIG. 14 is a simplified graph of the graph shown in FIG. 13; 
     FIG. 15 is a graph showing expectation function values for every divisor in a regular distribution having the period of λ=36 in case of determination of the period of the regular distribution; 
     FIG. 16 is a simplified graph of the graph shown in FIG. 15; 
     FIG. 17 is a diagram showing an example containing a regular distribution; 
     FIG. 18 is a graph showing the analyzing result of a period in case of the regular distribution shown in FIG. 17 in the vertical direction; 
     FIG. 19 is a block diagram showing the structure of the fault distribution analyzing system of the semiconductor integrated circuit according to a third embodiment of the present invention; 
     FIGS. 20 and 21 are flow charts showing a data registering process of and outputting process of an analyzing result of the fault distribution analyzing system according to the third embodiment of the present invention; 
     FIG. 22 is a flow chart showing a data retrieving process of the fault distribution analyzing system according to the third embodiment of the present invention; 
     FIG. 23 is a block diagram showing the structure of the fault distribution analyzing system of the semiconductor integrated circuit according to a modification of the above embodiments of the present invention; and 
     FIG. 24 is a block diagram showing the structure of the fault distribution analyzing system of the semiconductor integrated circuit according to another modification of the above embodiments of the present invention. 
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     Hereinafter, the fault distribution analyzing system of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the attached drawings. 
     In conjunction with the present invention, there is a copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/219,349 claiming the priority based on Japanese Patent application No. Heisei 9-355926. The disclosure of the copending US patent application is incorporated herein by reference. 
     First Embodiment 
     FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the structure of the fault distribution analyzing system of the semiconductor integrated circuit according to the first embodiment. Refers to FIG. 1, the fault distribution analyzing system is composed of a position coordinate input unit  1 , a calculating unit  2 , an analyzing unit  3  and an output unit  4 . The calculating unit  2  is composed of a position interval calculating section  21 , a combinations calculating section  22 , a frequency calculating section  23  and an expectation value function calculating section  24 . 
     The position coordinate inputting unit  1  reads a test data of a semiconductor integrated circuit from a data base. Circuit elements are regularly arranged in the semiconductor integrated circuit. The position coordinate inputting unit  1  inputs a position coordinate x of each of fault elements in the semiconductor integrated circuit in a specific direction and transfers the position coordinate of the fault element to the calculating unit  2 . 
     The position interval calculating section  21  calculates a position coordinate interval |Δx| between every two of all the fault elements supplied from position coordinate inputting unit  1  in units of length units based on the position coordinates x of all the fault elements. The number of combinations of two of all the fault elements is N(= n C 2 =n(n−1)/2). 
     The combinations calculating section  22  calculates the number of combinations Nx(=N−ux) by subtracting the number of combinations ux in which the value of |Δx| is 0 from the number of combinations N. 
     The frequency calculating section  23  determines all of the divisors f in each of the position coordinate intervals |Δx|. The divisor f is an integer equal to or more than “2” and equal to or less than the maximum value |Δx| max  of |Δx|. The frequency calculating section  23  calculates the frequency Σm(f) of each divisor f (hereinafter, to be referred to as a divisor depending frequency). 
     The expectation value function calculating section  24  multiplies an appearance probability P(f)(=Σm(f)/Nx) of each of the divisors f for the number of combinations Nx determined by the combinations calculating section  22  with the corresponding divisor f over all the divisors f to produce expectation function values T(f)=f·P(f). Because the divisor is multiplied with the appearance probability, the expectation function value becomes “1”, if the distribution is irregular. For example, when there are three cards, the appearance probability of one card is ⅓. Since three cards are present, the expectation function value is “1” (=⅓×3). Then, the expectation value function calculating section  24  transfers the calculated expectation function values T(f) to the analyzing unit  3 . 
     The analyzing unit  3  is composed of a computer which executes a predetermined analysis program. The analyzing unit  3  analyzes whether all the expectation function values T(f) calculated by the expectation value function calculating section  24  are equal to or less than “1”. When all the expectation function values T(f) are equal to or less than “1”, the analyzing unit  3  determines that the distribution of fault elements is an irregular distribution. On the other hand, when one expectation function values T(f) exceeding “1” is contained, the analyzing unit  3  determines that a regular portion is contained in the distribution of fault elements. The analyzing unit  3  transfers the determination result to the output unit  4 . 
     The output unit  4  is composed of a display unit such as a CRT (Cathode Ray Tube) and/or a printer. The output unit  4  outputs the calculation result by the calculating unit  2  and the analysis result by the analyzing unit  3 . The output unit  4  may store the calculation result by the calculating unit  2  and the analysis result by the analyzing unit  3  in a recording medium such as a magnetic disk. 
     It should be noted that the calculating unit  2  may be realized by a computer which executes the programs corresponding to the functions of the position interval calculating section  21 , combinations calculating section  22 , frequency calculating section  23  and expectation value function calculating section  24 . Also, the analyzing unit  3  may be realized by the computer which is identical to the calculating unit  2 . In this case, the computer executes a program for the expectation function analysis. 
     Hereinafter, the processing of the fault distribution analyzing system of the semiconductor integrated circuit according to the first embodiment will be described with reference to the flow chart shown in FIG.  2 . 
     First, the position coordinate x of each of the fault elements contained in a specific direction of the semiconductor integrated circuit to be analyzed is retrieved or inputted from the position coordinate inputting unit  1 . The supplied position coordinates x are transferred to the calculating unit  2  from the position coordinate inputting unit  1  (Step S 101 ). 
     In the calculating unit  2 , first, the position interval calculating section  21  calculates the position coordinate intervals |Δx| between optional two of the fault elements based on the position coordinates x of the two fault elements over all the fault elements. At this time, the number of combinations is N(= n C 2 =n(n−1)/2). For example, the position interval calculating section  21  counts the number n of position coordinates x, and calculates the number of combinations N(= n C 2 =n(n−1)/2) (Step S 102 ). 
     Next, the combinations calculating section  22  counts the number of combinations ux, in each of which the value of the position coordinate interval |Δx| is “0”. After that, the combinations calculating section  22  subtracts the counted value ux from the number of combinations N counted at the step S 102  to determine the number of combinations Nx (Step S 103 ). 
     Next, frequency calculating section  23  determines the divisor f for each of the position coordinate intervals |Δx| determined at the step S 102 . The divisor f which is determined here is an integer equal to or more than “2” and the maximum value of the divisor f is equal to the maximum value |Δx| max  of the position coordinate intervals |Δx| (Step S 104 ). Moreover, the frequency calculating section  23  calculates the frequency Σm(f) for every value of the divisors f determined at the step S 103  as the divisor depending frequency (Step S 105 ). 
     Next, the expectation value function calculating section  24  determines an appearance probability P(f)=Σm(f)/Nx for each of the divisors f for the number of combinations Nx determined by the combinations calculating section  22  and then multiplies the appearance probability with the value of the corresponding divisor f to calculates an expectation function value T(f)=f·P(f). The expectation value function calculating section  24  calculates the expectation function values T(f) over all the divisors f. Then, the calculating unit  2  transfers the expectation function values T(f) calculated by the expectation value function calculating section  24  to the analyzing unit  3  (Step S 106 ). It should be noted that the calculation result of the calculating unit  2  at the above-mentioned steps S 102  to S 106  is also transferred to the output unit  4 . 
     Next, the analyzing unit  3  checks each of the expectation function values T(f) to determine whether each of the expectation function values T(f) transferred from the calculating unit  2  is equal to or less than “1” (Step S 107 ). When the expectation function values T(f) are all equal to or less than “1”, the analyzing unit  3  determines that the distribution of fault elements is an irregular distribution, and transfers the determination result to the output unit  4  (Step S 108 ). On the other hand, when at least one of the expectation function values T(f) exceeds “1”, the analyzing unit  3  determines that the distribution of fault elements contains a regular distribution, and transfers the determination result to the output unit  4  (Step S 109 ). 
     Then, the output unit  4  outputs the calculation result transferred from the calculating unit  2  and the determination result transferred from the analyzing unit  3  as the analysis result (Step S 110 ). Then, the fault analyzing process of this flow chart is ended. 
     Hereinafter, what analyzing result is obtained from the position coordinates of the fault distribution inputted from the position coordinate inputting unit  1  in the fault distribution analyzing system will be described in detail based on specific examples. 
     EXAMPLE 1-1 
     In this example, it is supposed that the number of fault elements in the semiconductor integrated circuit is n=5 and the position coordinates of the fault elements in a specific direction are (x)=(1), (2), (3), (4) and (5). 
     {circle around (1)} The Calculation of the Position Coordinate Intervals |Δx| (Step S 102 ) 
     In this example, the following combinations are possible: 
     x=2, 3, 4, 5 to coordinate x=1; 
     x=3, 4, 5 to coordinate x=2; 
     x=3, 4, 5 to coordinate x=3; and 
     x=5 to coordinate x=4. 
     Therefore, the position coordinate intervals |Δx| between optional two of the fault elements are:                            Δ                 x          =                     2   -   1            ,          3   -     1           ,           4     -   1          ,          5   -   1          ,          3   -   2          ,          4   -   2          ,          5   -   2          ,          4   -   3          ,                                   5   -   3          ,          5   -   4                          =              1     ,   2   ,   3   ,   4   ,   1   ,   2   ,   3   ,   1   ,   2   ,   1.                                  
     Also, the number of combinations N is:                   N   =     C   2           n                     =     n                     (     n   -   1     )     /   2                   =     5                     (     5   -   1     )     /   2                   =   10                                  
     {circle around (2)} The Calculation of the Number of Combinations Nx (Step S 103 ) 
     Because all the intervals |Δx|&gt;0, there is not any combination that |Δx| is 0 in this example, i.e., ux=0. Therefore,                     N                 x     =     N   -     u                 x                   =     10   -   0                 =   10.                                  
     {circle around (3)} The Calculation of Divisors f (Step S 104 ) 
     The divisors f which is equal to or more than “2” are determined for each of the position coordinate intervals |Δx| as follows: 
     there is no divisor f to |Δx|=1; 
     the divisor f is 2 to |Δx|=2; 
     the divisor f is 3 to |Δx|=3; 
     the divisors f are 2 and 4 to |Δx|=4; 
     there is no divisor f to |Δx|=1; 
     the divisor f is 2 to |Δx|=2; 
     the divisor f is 3 to |Δx|=3; 
     there is no divisor f to |Δx|=1; 
     the divisor f is 2 to |Δx|=2; and 
     there is no divisor f to |Δx|=1. 
     {circle around (4)} The Calculation of Divisor Depending Frequency Σm(f) (Step S 105 ) 
     The divisor depending frequency Σm(f) is calculated for each of the calculated divisors f as follows: 
     
       
           Σm (2)=4; 
       
     
     
       
           Σm (3)=2; 
       
     
     and 
     
       
           Σm (4)=1 
       
     
     {circle around (5)} The Calculation of Expectation Function Values T(f) (Step S 106 ) 
     The appearance probability P(f) of each of the above-mentioned divisors f(=2, 3 and 4) is: 
     
       
           P (2)=4/10 
       
     
     
       
           P (3)=2/10 
       
     
     
       
           P (4)=1/10 
       
     
     Therefore, the expectation function values T(f) to the divisors f are: 
     
       
           T (2)=2×4/10=0.8 
       
     
     
       
           T (3)=3×2/10=0.6 
       
     
     
       
           T (4)=4×1/10=0.4 
       
     
     {circle around (6)} The Analysis of the Fault Distribution (Step S 107  to S 109 ) 
     In this example, the expectation function values T(f) to each of the divisors f(=2, 3 and 4) are between “0” and “1”. Therefore, in this example, the fault distribution is determined to be an irregular distribution. 
     A result of the of expectation function values T(f) to the divisor of f=128 is shown in FIG. 3 when a range is extended to the number of fault elements of n=2 to 2048, (x=1 to 2048) as the reference. As seen from the figure, the expectation function value T(f) increases to approach from “0” to “1”, as the number of fault elements n decreases. However, the expectation function value T(f) never exceeds “1”. 
     EXAMPLE 1-2 
     In this example, it is supposed that the number of fault elements in a semiconductor integrated circuit n=6 and the position coordinate of each fault element in the specific direction is (x)=(1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (c). It should be noted that the value of c is equal to either one of “1” to “5”. 
     {circle around (1)} The Calculation of the Position Coordinate Intervals |Δx| (Step S 102 ) 
     In this example, the following combinations are possible: 
     x=2, 3, 4, 5 and c to coordinate x=1; 
     x=3, 4, 5 and c to coordinate x=2; 
     x=4, 5 and c to coordinate x=3; 
     x=5 and c to coordinate x=4; and 
     x=c to coordinate x=5. 
     Therefore, the position coordinate intervals |Δx| between optional two of the fault elements are:                            Δ                 x          =                     2   -   1            ,          3   -     1           ,           4     -   1          ,          5   -   1          ,          c   -   1          ,          3   -   2          ,          4   -   2          ,          5   -   2          ,                                   c   -   2          ,          4   -   3          ,          5   -   3          ,          c   -   3          ,          5   -   4          ,          c   -   4          ,          c   -   5                          =              1     ,   2   ,   3   ,   4   ,   1   ,   2   ,   3   ,   1   ,   2   ,   1   ,                                   c   -   1          ,          c   -   2          ,          c   -   3          ,          c   -   4          ,          c   -   5                                           
     Also, the number of combinations N is:                   N   =     C   2           n                     =     n                     (     n   -   1     )     /   2                   =     6                     (     6   -   1     )     /   2                   =   15                                  
     {circle around (2)} The Calculation of the Number of Combinations Nx (Step S 103 ) 
     Because the value of c is equal to either one of “1” to “5”, |Δx|=0 in one of |c-1|, |c- 2|, |c-3|, |c-4| and |c-5|. That is, the number of combinations with |Δx|=0 is ux=1 in this example. Therefore,                     N                 x     =     N   -     u                 x                   =     15   -   1                 =   14.                                  
     {circle around (3)} The Calculation of Divisors f (Step S 104 ) 
     The divisors f which meet the condition mentioned above includes the divisors f in the example 1-1 and the divisors f determined based on the value of c. Here, in case of |c-1|, |c-2|, |c-3|, |c-4| and |c-5|, 
     when c=1, |Δx|=0, 1, 2, 3, 4; 
     when c=2, |Δx|=1, 0, 1, 2, 3; 
     when c=3, |Δx|=2, 1, 0, 1, 2; 
     when c=4, |Δx|=3, 2, 1, 0, 1; and 
     when c=5, |Δx|=4, 3, 2, 1, 0. 
     In this way, the divisors F when c=1 is the same as those when C=5 and the divisors F when c=2 is the same as those when C=4. 
     When c=1 or 5, the divisors f are determined as follows: 
     case of |Δx|=0 is out of analysis; 
     there is no divisor f to |Δx|=1; 
     the divisor f is 2 to |Δx|=2; 
     the divisor f is 3 to |Δx|=3; and 
     the divisors f are 2 and 4 to |Δx|=4. 
     Also, when c=2 or 4, the divisors f are determined as follows: 
     there is no divisor f to |Δx|=1; 
     case of |Δx|=0 is out of analysis; 
     there is no divisor f to |Δx|=1; 
     the divisor f is 2 to |Δx|=2; and 
     the divisor f is 3 to |Δx|=3. 
     Also, when c=3, the divisors f are determined as follows: 
     the divisor f is 2 to |Δx|=2; 
     there is no divisor f to |Δx|=1; 
     case of |Δx|=0 is out of analysis; 
     there is no divisor f to |Δx|=1; and 
     the divisor f is 2 to |Δx|=2. 
     {circle around (4)} The Calculation of Divisor Depending Frequency Σm(f) (Step S 105 ) 
     The divisor depending frequency Σm(f) with no relation to the value of c is calculated for each of the calculated divisors f as follows: 
     
       
           Σm (2)=4; 
       
     
     
       
           Σm (3)=2; 
       
     
     and 
       Σm (4)=1 
     Therefore, the divisor depending frequency Σm(f) to be determined is the above frequencies and the divisor depending frequency Σm(f) with relation to the value of c. 
     When c=1 or 5, the divisor depending frequencies Σm(f) to be determined are as follows: 
     
       
           Σm (2)=4+2=6; 
       
     
     
       
           Σm (3)=2+1=3; 
       
     
     and 
     
       
           Σm (4)=1+1=2. 
       
     
     When c=2 or 4, the divisor depending frequencies Σm(f) to be determined are as follows: 
     
       
           Σm (2)=4+1=5: 
       
     
     
       
           Σm (3)=2+1=3; 
       
     
     and 
     
       
           Σm (4)=1. 
       
     
     When c=3, the divisor depending frequencies Σm(f) to be determined are as follows: 
     
       
           Σm (2)=4+2=6; 
       
     
     
       
           Σm (3)=2; 
       
     
     and 
     
       
           Σm (4)=1. 
       
     
     {circle around (5)} The Calculation of Expectation Function Value T(f) (Step S 106 ) 
     When c=1 or 5, the appearance probability P(f) of each of the above-mentioned divisors f(=2, 3 and 4) is: 
     
       
           P (2)=6/14 
       
     
     
       
           P (3)=3/14 
       
     
     
       
           P (4)=2/14 
       
     
     Therefore, the expectation function values T(f) to the divisors f are: 
     
       
           T (2)=2×6/14=0.86; 
       
     
     
       
           T (3)=3×3/14=0.64; 
       
     
     and 
     
       
           T (4)=4×2/14=0.57. 
       
     
     Also, when c=2 or 4, the appearance probability P(f) of each of the above-mentioned divisors f(=2, 3 and 4) are as follows: 
     
       
           P (2)=5/14 
       
     
     
       
           P (3)=3/14 
       
     
     
       
           P (4)=1/14 
       
     
     Therefore, the expectation function values T(f) to the divisors f are as follows: 
     
       
           T (2)=2×5/14=0.71; 
       
     
     
       
           T (3)=3×3/14=0.64; 
       
     
     and 
     
       
           T (4)=4×1/14=0.29. 
       
     
     Also, when c=3, the appearance probability P(f) of each of the above-mentioned divisors f(=2, 3 and 4) are as follows: 
     
       
           P (2)=6/14 
       
     
     
       
           P (3)=2/14 
       
     
     
       
           P (4)=1/14 
       
     
     Therefore, the expectation function values T(f) to the divisors f are as follows: 
     
       
           T (2)=2×6/14=0.86; 
       
     
     
       
           T (3)=3×2/14=0.43; 
       
     
     and 
     
       
           T (4)=4×1/14=0.29. 
       
     
     {circle around (6)} The Analysis of the Fault Distribution (Step S 107  to S 109 ) 
     In this example, the expectation function values T(f) to each of the divisors f(=2, 3 and 4) are between “0” and “1”, even if the value of c is either of values of “1” to “5”. Therefore, in this example, the fault distribution is determined to be an irregular distribution, even if the value of c is either of values of “1” to “5”. 
     EXAMPLE 1-3 
     In this example, it is supposed that the number of fault elements in a semiconductor integrated circuit n=6 and the position coordinate each fault element in the specific direction is (x)=(1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (c). It should be noted that it is supposed to be c=3. 
     {circle around (1)} The Calculation of the Position Coordinate Intervals |Δx| (Step S 102 ) 
     In this example, the following combinations are possible: 
     x=2, 3, 3, 4, and 5 to coordinate x=1; 
     x=3, 3, 4, and 5 to coordinate x=2; 
     x=3, 4, and 5 to coordinate x=3; 
     x=3, and 4 to coordinate x=3; and 
     x=5 to coordinate x=4. 
     Therefore, the position coordinate intervals |Δx| between optional two of the fault elements are as follows:                            Δ                 x          =                     2   -   1            ,          3   -     1           ,           3     -   1          ,          4   -   1          ,          5   -   1          ,          3   -   2          ,          3   -   2          ,          4   -   2          ,                                   5   -   2          ,          3   -   3          ,          4   -   3          ,          5   -   3          ,          4   -   3          ,          5   -   3          ,          5   -   4                          =              1     ,   2   ,   2   ,   3   ,   4   ,   1   ,   1   ,   2   ,   3   ,   0   ,   1   ,   2   ,   1   ,   2   ,     and                 1                                    
     Also, the number of combinations N is:                   N   =     C   2           n                     =     n                     (     n   -   1     )     /   2                   =     6                     (     6   -   1     )     /   2                   =   15                                  
     {circle around (2)} The Calculation of the Number of Combinations Nx (Step S 103 ) 
     Because only |3-3| is |Δx|=“0”, the number of combinations with |Δx|=0 is ux=“1” in this example. Therefore,                     N                 x     =     N   -     u                 x                   =     15   -   1                 =   14.                                  
     
       {circle around (3)} The Calculation of Divisors f (Step S104)  
     
     The divisors f which meet the condition mentioned above are determined as follow for each of the position coordinate intervals |Δx|: 
     there is no divisor f to |Δx|=1; 
     the divisor f is 2 to |Δx|=2; 
     the divisor f is 2 to |Δx|=2; 
     the divisor f is 3 to |Δx|=3; 
     the divisors f are 2 and 4 to |Δx|=4; 
     there is no divisor f to |Δx|=1; 
     there is no divisor f to |Δx|=1; 
     the divisor f is 2 to |Δx|=2; 
     the divisor f is 3 to |Δx|=3; 
     case of |Δx|=0 is out of analysis; 
     there is no divisor f to |Δx|=1; 
     the divisor f is 2 to |Δx|=2; 
     there is no divisor f to |Δx|=1; 
     the divisor f is 2 to |Δx|=2; and 
     there is no divisor f to |Δx|=1. 
     {circle around (4)} The Calculation of Divisor Depending Frequencies Σm(f) (Step S 105 ) 
     The divisor depending frequency Σm(f) to each of the divisors f determined mentioned above is calculated as follows: 
     
       
           Σm (2)=6; 
       
     
     
       
           Σm (3)=2; 
       
     
     and 
     
       
           Σm (4)=1 
       
     
     {circle around (5)} The Calculation of Expectation Function Value T(f) (Step S 106 ). 
     The appearance probability P(f) of each of the above-mentioned divisors f(=2, 3 and 4) is as follows: 
     
       
           P (2)=6/14 
       
     
     
       
           P (3)=2/14 
       
     
     
       
           P (4)=1/14 
       
     
     Therefore, the expectation function values T(f) to the divisors f are: 
     
       
           T (2)=2×6/14=0.86; 
       
     
     
       
           T (3)=3×2/14=0.43; 
       
     
     and 
     
       
           T (4)=4×1/14=0.29. 
       
     
     {circle around (6)} The Analysis of the Fault Distribution (Step S 107  to S 109 ) 
     In this example, the expectation function values T(f) to each of the divisors f(=2, 3 and 4) are between “0” and “1”. Therefore, in this example, the fault distribution is determined to be an irregular distribution. 
     EXAMPLE 1-4 
     In this example, it is supposed that the number of fault elements in a semiconductor integrated circuit n=7 and the position coordinate to each fault element in the specific direction is (x)=(1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (5) and (c). It should be noted that it is supposed to be c=5. 
     {circle around (1)} The Calculation of the Position Coordinate Intervals |Δx| (Step S 102 ) 
     In this example, the following combinations are possible: 
     x=2, 3, 4, 5 and 5 to coordinate x=1; 
     x=3, 4, 5 and 5 to coordinate x=2; 
     x=4, 5 and 5 to coordinate x=3; 
     x=5 and 5 to coordinate x=4; and 
     x=5 to coordinate x=5. 
     Therefore, the position coordinate intervals |Δx| between optional two of the fault elements are as follows:                            Δ                 x          =                     2   -   1            ,          3   -   1          ,          4   -   1          ,          5   -   1          ,          5   -   1          ,          3   -   2          ,          4   -   2          ,          5   -   2          ,                                   5   -   2          ,          4   -   3          ,          5   -   3          ,          5   -   3          ,          5   -   4          ,          5   -   4          ,          5   -   5                          =              1     ,   2   ,   3   ,   4   ,   4   ,   1   ,   2   ,   3   ,   3   ,   1   ,   2   ,   2   ,   1   ,     1                 and                 1                                    
     Also, the number of combinations N is:                   N   =     C   2           n                     =     n                     (     n   -   1     )     /   2                   =     6                     (     6   -   1     )     /   2                   =   15                                  
     {circle around (2)} The Calculation of the Number of Combinations Nx (Step S 103 ) 
     Because only |5-5| is |Δx|=0, the number of combinations with |Δx|=0 is ux=1 in this example. Therefore,                     N                 x     =     N   -     u                 x                   =     15   -   1                 =   14.                                  
     {circle around (3)} The Calculation of Divisors f (Step S 104 ) 
     The divisors f which meet the condition mentioned above are determined as follow for each of the position coordinate intervals |Δx|: 
     there is no divisor f to |Δx|=1; 
     the divisor f is 2 to |Δx|=2; 
     the divisor f is 3 to |Δx|=3; 
     the divisors f are 2 and 4 to |Δx|=4; 
     the divisors f are 2 and 4 to |Δx|=4; 
     there is no divisor f to |Δx|=1; 
     the divisor f is 2 to |Δx|=2; 
     the divisor f is 3 to |Δx|=3; 
     the divisor f is 3 to |Δx|=3; 
     there is no divisor f to |Δx|=1; 
     the divisor f is 2 to |Δx|=2; 
     the divisor f is 2 to |Δx|=2; 
     there is no divisor f to |Δx|=1; 
     there is no divisor f to |Δx|=1; and 
     case of |Δx|=0 is out of analysis. 
     {circle around (4)} The Calculation of Divisor Depending Frequency Σm(f) (Step S 105 ) 
     The divisor depending frequency Σm(f) to each of the divisors f determined mentioned above is calculated as follows: 
     
       
         Σ m (2)=6; 
       
     
     
       
         Σ m (3)=3; 
       
     
     and 
      Σ m (4)=1 
     {circle around (5)} The Calculation of Expectation Function Value T(f) (Step S 106 ). 
     The appearance probability P(f) of each of the above-mentioned divisors f(=2, 3 and 4) is as follows: 
     
       
           P (2)=6/14 
       
     
     
       
           P (3)=3/14 
       
     
     
       
           P (4)=2/14 
       
     
     Therefore, the expectation function values T(f) to the divisors f are: 
     
       
           T (2)=2×6/14=0.86; 
       
     
     
       
           T (3)=3×2/14=0.64; 
       
     
     and 
     
       
           T (4)=4×2/14=0.57.  
       
     
     {circle around (6)} The Analysis of the Fault Distribution (Step S 107  to S 109 ) 
     In this example, the expectation function values T(f) to each of the divisors f(=2, 3 and 4) are between “0” and “1”. Therefore, in this example, the fault distribution is determined to be an irregular distribution. 
     Moreover, the fault distribution analyzing system in the first embodiment will be described, using actually obtained data as an example. 
     FIG. 4 is a graph showing an example of an actual irregular distribution (the number of fault elements is n=37000). It is difficult to visually analyze the fault distribution, because the black points corresponding to the fault elements are irregularly distributed in this graph. FIG. 5 shows a graph showing the analysis result of the irregular distribution shown in FIG. 4 by the calculating unit  2  and the analyzing unit  3 . As seen from FIG. 5, the expectation function values T(f) do not exceed “1” for all the divisors f. Therefore, the fact that the fault distribution shown in FIG. 4 is the irregular distribution can be easily distinguished from this result. 
     As described above, in the fault distribution analyzing system in the first embodiment, the divisors f are found for all the combinations of optional two of the position coordinate intervals |Δx|. Then, the expectation function value T(f) is calculated to each of the divisors f. When all the expectation function values T(f) are equal to or less than “1”, the fault element distribution is determined to be an irregular distribution. Therefore, when fault cause candidates are selected from the fault distribution, it is possible to prevent wrong selection by the analysis technical expert. Also, the fault cause candidates can be concisely and quickly selected. In this way, it is possible to easily distinguish whether the fault element distribution is an irregular distribution or contains a regular distribution. For example, the regular distribution is sometimes caused by a wrong design of a semiconductor integrated circuit such as an erroneous wiring and a size error. Also, for example, the irregular distribution is sometimes caused by the manufacturing process of the semiconductor integrated circuit such as alien substance in a process gas, change of a concentration of etching gas and irregularity of a temperature distribution on a wafer. 
     Also, the position coordinate data of the fault elements is proportional to the number of fault elements. However, the position coordinate data can be converted into the expectation function values T(f) with respect to the divisors f for position coordinate intervals |Δx|. Therefore, the data size can be made small without dependence on the number of fault elements. Thus, the data indicative of the fault tendency can be saved over a long time without limitation of a memory capacity of the analyzing unit. 
     Second Embodiment 
     FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing the structure of the fault distribution analyzing system of the semiconductor integrated circuit according to the second embodiment of the present invention. In this fault distribution analyzing system, a regular distribution analyzing unit  5  is added to the fault distribution analyzing system shown in FIG. 1 in the first embodiment. 
     When the fault distribution is determined to contain a regular distribution by the analyzing unit  3 , the regular distribution analyzing unit  5  analyzes the regular distribution in detail. More specifically, a value of the difference |Δf| max (=|f 2nd −f 1st |) is determined, where f 1st  is a divisor when the expectation function value T(f) takes a maximum value T(f) 1st  and f 2nd  is a divisor when the expectation function value T(f) takes the second largest value T(f) 2nd . Subsequently, it is determined whether the value of |Δf| max  is equal to the divisor f 1st  or is in the permissible range δ(T(f) 1st &gt;&gt;δ≧0). When the value of |Δf| max  is equal to the divisor f 1st  or is in the permissible range δ(T(f) 1st &gt;&gt;δ≧0) the regular distribution analyzing unit  5  determines that the fault distribution contains the regular distribution of the period of λ. The basis of the determination of the period λ in such a regular distribution will be described later. Also, in this fault distribution analyzing system, the output unit  4  outputs the analysis result of the regular distribution analyzing unit  5  together with the data in the first embodiment. 
     It should be noted that the regular distribution analyzing unit  5  may be realized on the same computer as the calculating unit  2  and/or the analyzing unit  3 . In this case, the computer executes a program for analysis of the regular distribution, too. 
     Next, the determination of the period λ in the regular distribution will be described in detail. Here, the analysis of the regular distribution is carried out in the range of n=2 to 2048 (x=1 to 2048) and expectation function values T(f) to f=128 is drawn on a graph. Also, a simplified graph is shown to help understanding, depending on the period λ. 
     A graph of the expectation function values T(f) in the case of the period of λ=2 is shown in FIG. 9 and a simplified graph is shown in FIG.  10 . As seen from FIGS. 9 and 10, the expectation function T(f) increases as the number of fault elements n increases. When a divisor f is not coincident with a multiple of the period λ(=2), the expectation function values T(f) are equal to or more than “0”, and moreover approaches “1”. However, the expectation function values T(f) never exceeds “1”. On the other hand, when a divisor f is coincident with the multiple of λ(=2), the maximum value T(f) 1st  of the expectation function values T(f) exceeds “1”. 
     In the same way, a graph of the expectation function T(f) in the case of the period of λ=3 is shown in FIG.  11 . As seen from FIG. 11, the expectation function values T(f) approaches from “0” to “1” but never exceeds “1”, in the case that the divisor f is other than a multiple of A On the other hand, the maximum value T(f) 1st  of the expectation function values T(f) exceeds “1”, when a divisor f is coincident with a multiple of λ. Also, the expectation function values T(f) shown in FIGS. 9 and 11 have the maximum values T(f) 1st =λ at the time of the divisor of f 1st =λ, respectively. Moreover, the expectation function values T(f) have the next largest value T(f) 2nd  at the time of the divisor of f 2nd =2λ. That is, because |Δf| max =|f 2nd −f 1st |=|2λ−λ|=λ=T(f) 1st , the fault distribution is determined to contain a regular distribution of the period λ having |Δf max  as the divisor. 
     In the same way, a graph of the expectation function values T(f) in the case of the period of λ=5 is shown in FIG.  12 . As seen from FIG. 12, the expectation function values T(f) approach from “0” to “1” but never exceed “1”, when the divisor f is other than a multiple of λ. On the other hand, the maximum value T(f) 1st  of the expectation function values T(f) exceeds “1”, when the divisor f is coincident with a multiple of λ. Also, the expectation function values T(f) shown in FIGS. 9,  11  and  12  have the maximum values T(f) 1st =λ at the time of the divisor f 1st =λ, respectively. Moreover, the expectation function values T(f) have the next largest value T(f) 2nd  at the time of the divisor of f 2nd =2λ. That is, because |Δf| max =|f 2nd −f 1st |=2λ−λ|=λ=T(f) 1st , the fault distribution is determined to contain a regular distribution of the period λ having |Δf| max  as the divisor. 
     Also, a graph of the expectation function values T(f) in the case of the period of λ=10 is shown in FIG.  13 . Also, a simplified graph is shown in FIG.  14 . When the period λ itself has a divisor as shown in FIGS. 13 and 14, the expectation function values T(f) approach from “0” to “1” but never exceed “1”, when the divisor f is other than a multiple of λ(=10) and other than a multiple of a divisor(=2 or 5) of the divisor λ itself. On the other hand, the maximum value T(f) 1st  of the expectation function values T(f) exceed “1”, when the divisor f is a multiple of the period λ(=10) or a multiple of the divisor(=2 or 5) of the divisor λ itself. Also, the expectation function values T(f) have the maximum values T(f) 1st =λ at the time of the divisor of f 1st =10(=λ). Moreover, the expectation function values T(f) have the next largest values T(f ) 2nd  at the time of the divisor of f 2nd =2λ. Because |Δf| max =|f 2nd −f 1st |=λ=T(f) 1st , the fault distribution is determined to contain a regular distribution of the period of λ=10 having |Δf| max  as the divisor. 
     Also, a graph of the expectation function values T(f) in the case of the period of λ=36 is shown in FIG.  15 . Also, a simplified graph is shown in FIG.  16 . As seen from FIGS. 15 and 16, the expectation function values T(f) approach from “0” to “1” but never exceed “1”, when the divisor f is other than a multiple of the period λ(=36) and is other than a multiple of a divisor(=2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 18) of the divisor λ itself. On the other hand, the maximum value T(f) 1st  of the expectation function values T(f) exceeds “1”, when the divisor f is a multiple of the period λ(=36 ) or the multiple of a divisor(=2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 18) of the period λ itself. Also, the expectation function values T(f) have the maximum value T(f) 1st =λ at the time of the divisor of f=36(=λ) and moreover have the second largest value of T(f) 2nd  at the time of the divisor of f 2nd =2λ. Because |Δf| max =|f 2nd −f 1st |=λ=T(f) 1st , the fault distribution is determined to contain a regular distribution of the period of λ=36 having |Δf| max  as the divisor. 
     As the conclusion, when the fault element distribution contains a regular distribution of the period λ of only one kind, the difference |Δf| max  between the divisor of f 1st  when the expectation function values T(f) have the maximum value of T(f) 1st  exceeding “1” and the divisor of f 2nd  when the expectation function values T(f) have the second largest value of T(f) 2nd  is equal to the divisor of the period λ including the period λ itself, with no relation to the number of combinations n of the intervals between the fault elements and the kind of the period λ. 
     Hereinafter, the processing operation of the fault distribution analyzing system of the semiconductor integrated circuit according to the second embodiment will be described with reference to a flow chart shown in FIGS. 7 and 8. 
     The processing operation of the fault distribution analyzing system in the second embodiment is different from that of the fault distribution analyzing system shown in FIG. 2 in the first embodiment in that the processing operation when it is determined at the step S 107  that either of the expectation function values T(f) exceeds “1”, and it is determined at the step S 109  that the fault distribution contains a regular distribution. Also, the calculation result by the expectation value function calculating section  24  at the step S 106  is transferred from the calculating unit  2  to the regular distribution analyzing unit  5 . 
     When the fault distribution is determined at the step S 109  to contain the regular distribution, the regular distribution analyzing unit  5  determines the value of difference |Δf| max (=|f 2nd −f 1st |) between the divisor of f 1st  when the expectation function values T(f) transferred from the calculating unit  2  have the maximum value of T(f) 1st  and the divisor f 2nd  when the expectation function values T(f) have the second largest value of T(f) 2nd  (Step S 201 ). 
     Next, the regular distribution analyzing unit  5  determines whether or not the value of difference |Δf| max  is equal to the divisor of f 1st  (Step S 202 ). When it is determined that the value of difference |Δf| max  is equal to the divisor of f 1st , the regular distribution analyzing unit  5  executes the processing of a step S 204  to be described later. 
     On the other hand, when it is determined that the value of difference |Δf| max  is not equal to the divisor of f 1st  the regular distribution analyzing unit  5  determines whether or not the value of difference |Δf| max  is in the permissive range δ(T(f)1st&gt;&gt;δ≧0) (Step S 203 ). When it is determined that the value of difference |Δf| max  is not in the permissive range δ, the control advances to a step S 110 . At the step S 110 , the analysis result at the step S 109  from the analyzing unit  3  is outputted from the output unit  4 , as in the case of the first embodiment. 
     Also, when it is determined that the value of difference |Δf| max  is in the permissive range δ, the control advances to a step S 204 . At the step S 204 , the regular distribution analyzing unit  5  determines that a regular distribution of the period of λ is contained in the distribution of fault elements, and transfers the determination result to the output unit  4  as the analysis result. In this case, the output unit  4  outputs the analysis result at the step S 109  from the regular distribution analyzing unit  5  together with the above-mentioned data. 
     Hereinafter, what analysis result is obtained from the position coordinates of the fault element distribution which has been inputted from position coordinate inputting unit  1  in this fault distribution analyzing system will be described in detail based on an example. 
     EXAMPLE 2-1 
     In this example, it is supposed that the number of fault elements in a semiconductor integrated circuit n=5 and the position coordinate of each fault element in the specific direction is (x)=(1), (3), (5), (7) and (9). 
     {circle around (1)} The Calculation of the Position Coordinate Intervals |Δx| (Step S 102 ) 
     In this example, the following combinations are possible: 
     x=3, 5, 7 and 9 to coordinate x=1; 
     x=5, 7 and 9 to coordinate x=3; 
     x=7 and 9 to coordinate x=5; and 
     x=9 to coordinate x=7. 
     Therefore, the position coordinate intervals |Δx| between optional two of the fault elements are as follows:                            Δ                 x          =                     3   -   1            ,          5   -   1          ,          7   -   1          ,          9   -   1          ,          5   -   3          ,          7   -   3          ,          9   -   3          ,          7   -   5                                   and                        9   -   5                          =              2     ,   4   ,   6   ,   8   ,   2   ,   4   ,   6   ,   2   ,     4                 and                 2                                    
     Also, the number of combinations N is:                   N   =     C   2           n                     =     n                     (     n   -   1     )     /   2                   =     5                     (     5   -   1     )     /   2                   =   10                                  
     {circle around (2)} The Calculation of the Number of Combinations Nx (Step S 103 ) 
     Because all the position coordinate intervals |Δx| is larger than “0”, the number of combinations with Δx|=0 is ux=0 in this example. Therefore,                     N                 x     =     N   -     u                 x                   =     10   -   0                 =   10.                                  
     {circle around (3)} The Calculation of Divisors f (Step S 104 ) 
     The divisors f which are equal to or more than “2” are determined as follow for each of the position coordinate intervals |Δx|: 
     the divisor f is 2 to |Δx|=2; 
     the divisor f is 2 and 4 to |Δx|=4; 
     the divisors f are 2, 3 and 6 to |Δx|=6; 
     the divisors f are 2, 4 and 8 to |Δx|=8; 
     the divisor f is 2 to |Δx|=2; 
     the divisors f are 2 and 4 to |Δx|=4; 
     the divisors f are 2, 3 and 6 to |Δx|=6; 
     the divisor f is 2 to |Δx|=2; 
     the divisors f are 2 and 4 to |Δx|= 4; and    
     the divisor f is 2 to |Δx|=2. 
     {circle around (4)} The Calculation of Divisor Depending Frequency Σm(f) (Step S 105 ) 
     The divisor depending frequency Σm(f) to each of the divisors f determined mentioned above is calculated as follows: 
     
       
           Σm (2)=10; 
       
     
     
       
           Σm (3)=2; 
       
     
     
       
           Σm (4)=4; 
       
     
     
       
           Σm (5)=0; 
       
     
     
       
           Σm (6)=2; 
       
     
     
       
           Σm (7)=0; 
       
     
     and 
     
       
           Σm (8)=1. 
       
     
     {circle around (5)} The Calculation of Expectation Function Values T(f) (Step S 106 ). 
     The appearance probability P(f) of each of the above-mentioned divisors f is as follows: 
     
       
           P (2)=10/10; 
       
     
     
       
           P (3)=2/10; 
       
     
     
       
           P (4)=4/10; 
       
     
     
       
           P (5)=0/10; 
       
     
     
       
           P (6)=2/10; 
       
     
     
       
           P (7)=0/10; 
       
     
     and 
     ti  P (8)=1/10. 
     Therefore, the expectation function values T(f) to the divisors f are: 
       T (2)=2×10/14=20.; 
     
       
           T (3)=3×2/10=0.6; 
       
     
     
       
           T (4)=4×4/10=1.6; 
       
     
     
       
           T (5)=5×0/10=0.0; 
       
     
     
       
           T (6)=6×2/10=1.2; 
       
     
     
       
           T (7)=7×0/10=0.0; 
       
     
     and 
     
       
           T (8)=8×1/10=0.8. 
       
     
     {circle around (6)} The Analysis of the Fault Distribution (Step S 107  to S 109 ) 
     In this example, the expectation function values T(f) to each of the divisors f(=2, 4 and 6) exceed “1”. Therefore, in this example, the fault distribution is determined to be a regular distribution. As described above, in this example, since the fault distribution is determined to be an irregular distribution, the regular distribution is analyzed by the regular distribution analyzing unit  5 . 
     {circle around (7)} The Calculation of |Δf| max  (Step S 201 ) 
     In this example, the divisor f 1st  corresponding to the largest expectation function value T(f) is “2” and the divisor f 2nd  corresponding to the next largest expectation function value T(f) is “4”. Therefore, 
     
       
         |Δf| max =|4−2|=2 
       
     
     {circle around (8)} The Analysis of the Regular Distribution (S 202 -S 204 ) 
     As described above, the value of |Δf| max  is “2” and is equal to the value of “2” of the divisor f 1st  when the expectation function values T(f) have the maximum. Therefore, the fault distribution is determined to contain a regular distribution of the period λ in this example. 
     Next, the fault distribution analyzing system in the second embodiment will be described based on the actually obtained data. 
     FIG. 17 is an image showing an actual example containing the regular distribution (the number of fault elements is n=1000). It could be seen that the black points corresponding to the fault elements are regularly distributed. However, the period must be examined in detail. 
     FIG. 18 shows a graph of the analyzing result of the regular distribution shown in FIG. 17 by the regular distribution analyzing unit  5 . As seen from FIG. 18, the divisor f 1st  when the expectation function T(f) has the maximum is “1024” and the divisor f 2nd  when the expectation function T(f) has the second largest value is “2048”. Therefore,                            Δ                 f          max     =                       f     2      nd       -     f     1      st                                            2048   -   1024                      =              1024                                  
     Thus, it is possible to determine that the fault distribution contains a regular distribution of the period of λ=1024. 
     In this way, when the fault distribution contains an irregular distribution and the regular distributions of the different periods, the main periods of regular distributions can be detected. 
     As described above, in the fault distribution analyzing system in the second embodiment, the period λ of the regular distribution is determined based on the difference of the divisor f 1st  when the expectation function T(f) has the largest value T(f) 1st  and the divisor f 2nd  when the expectation function T(f) has the second largest value T(f) 2nd , i.e., |f 2nd −f 1st . Therefore, when the fault distribution is determined to contain a regular distribution, the period λ can be easily and quickly found. 
     Third Embodiment 
     FIG. 19 is a block diagram showing the structure of the fault distribution analyzing system of the semiconductor integrated circuit according to the third embodiment. In the fault distribution analyzing system, a multimedia data entry unit  6  and a data base unit  7  are added to the fault distribution analyzing system shown in FIG. 1 in the first embodiment. 
     The multimedia data entry unit  6  inputs an image showing an analysis object, i.e., a distribution of fault elements which are contained in a semiconductor integrated circuit and whose position coordinates x are inputted from the position coordinate inputting unit  1 , and transfers to the data base unit  7 . The image includes a diagram. It should be noted that there can be used as the multimedia data entry unit  6 , a computer for drawing the diagram in which the position coordinates of the fault elements are plotted, a scanner unit for imaging a photograph of the semiconductor integrated circuit as the analysis object and a video unit for producing a static image of the whole semiconductor integrated circuit from a picture of the semiconductor integrated circuit. 
     The data base unit  7  registers the image showing the fault distribution of the semiconductor integrated circuit which has been inputted from the multimedia data entry unit  6  to a data base  71  built on an auxiliary storage. Also, the data base unit  7  registers a set of the expectation function values T(f) and divisors f as a data unit on the data base  71  in correspondence with the image showing the previously registered fault distribution of the semiconductor integrated circuit, when the expectation function values T(f) exceeding “1” is determined to be contained by the analyzing unit  3 . Also, the data base unit  3  acquires a date and a time when the set of the expectation function values T(f) are registered on the data base  71  with respect to the divisors f and registers an identifier data which contains the acquired date and time, on the data base unit  71  in the correspondence to the set of the expectation function values T(f). 
     When a divisor f is inputted from the inputting unit such a keyboard, the data base unit  7  searches the data base  71  based on the inputted the divisor f to acquire the corresponding identifier data, the set of the expectation function value and the corresponding image showing the fault distribution. Then, the data base unit  7  transfers the searched data to the output unit  4 . 
     In the third embodiment, the output unit  4  outputs the calculation result of the calculating unit  2  and the analysis result of the analyzing unit  3 . In addition, the output unit  4  sorts the transferred data searched by and transferred from the data base unit  7  based on the data indicative of date and time contained in the identifier data which is contained in the searched data. Also, the calculation result of the calculating unit  2  and the analysis result of the analyzing unit  3  are transferred to the data base unit  7 . 
     It should be noted that the data base unit  7  may be realized on the computer for the calculating unit  2  and/or the analyzing unit  3 . In this case, the computer executes a data base program corresponding to the processing described above, and a data base is produced on a storage unit of the computer. 
     Hereinafter, the processing of the fault distribution analyzing system of the semiconductor integrated circuit according to the third embodiment will be described with reference to the flow chart shown in FIGS. 20 and 21. In this case, an image showing the distribution of fault elements contained in the semiconductor integrated circuit as an analysis object is previously registered on the data base  71  by the data base unit  7  prior to the processing of the flow chart shown in FIGS. 20 and 21. 
     The processing of the flow chart shown in FIGS. 20 and 21 is different from that of the flow chart shown in FIG. 2 in the first embodiment in the processing when it is determined at the step S 107  that any one of the expectation function values T(f) exceeds “1” and when it is determined at the step S 109  that the fault distribution contains a regular distribution. 
     When the fault distribution is determined to contain the regular distribution at the step S 109 , the data base unit  7  sets a set of the expectation function values T(f) as the data unit (Step S 301 ). Next, the data base unit  7  acquires a data indicative of a date and a time at present and generates the identifier data containing the acquired date and time data (Step S 302 ). 
     Next, the data base unit  7  registers as the data unit, the set of the expectation function values T(f) at the step S 301  and the identifier data generated at the step S 302  on the data base  71  in correspondence with the previously registered image showing the fault distribution (Step S 303 ). Then, the control advances to the processing of Step S 110 . 
     Next, the outputting operation of the data registered on the data base  71  will be described with reference to the flow chart shown in FIG.  22 . 
     First, an analysis technical experts such as a design person in charge of a semiconductor integrated circuit inputs optional divisors f from the inputting unit of the data base unit  7  (Step S 311 ). The data base unit  7  searches the data base  71  based on the divisors f inputted at the step S 311  to acquire the corresponding identifier data and the image showing the fault distribution. Then, the data base unit  7  transfers the searched data to the output unit  4  (Step S 312 ). 
     Next, the output unit  4  sorts the data transferred from the data base unit  7  based on the date and time data contained in the identifier data. Then, the output unit  4  outputs the data rows of a list in the sorted order (Step S 313 ). It should be noted that the images showing the fault distributions may be outputted when a cursor is positioned on a desired data row of the list and a command is inputted through a mouse click. Then, the processing of this flow chart is ended. 
     As described above, in the fault distribution analyzing system in the third embodiment, the set of the expectation function values T(f) is stored with respect to the divisors f in correspondence with the image showing the fault distribution. Then, by inputting the optional divisors f, the image showing the corresponding fault distribution is searched from the data base  71 . Therefore, the images showing the fault distributions having a common distribution characteristic can be correctly searched. 
     Also, the output unit  4  sorts and outputs the data rows searched from the data base  71  based on the date and time data in the identifier data. Therefore, it is possible to easily see whether the images showing the fault distributions having the common distribution characteristic increase or decrease as elapse of time. 
     Modification of the Embodiments 
     The present invention is not limited to the above-mentioned embodiments and various modifications and various applications are possible. Hereinafter, the modifications of the above-mentioned embodiment of the present invention will be described. 
     In the above-mentioned third embodiment, the multimedia data entry unit  6  and the data base unit  7  are added to the fault distribution analyzing system in the first embodiment. However, the multimedia data entry unit  6  and the data base unit  7  may be added to the fault distribution analyzing system in the second embodiment, as shown in FIG.  23 . 
     In the above first to third embodiments, the calculating unit  2  may realize the position interval calculating section  21 , the combinations calculating section  22 , the frequency calculating section  23  and the expectation value function calculating section  24  by a computer executing a program. Also, the functions of the analyzing unit  3  and regular distribution analyzing unit  5  may be realized by the computer executing a program. In this case, as shown in FIG. 24, the programs may be stored in a recording media  91  to  93  such as the CD-ROM which can read by the computer, as shown in FIG.  22 . When the recording medium is delivered, the programs may be read out from this recording medium and executed by either of the multi-used computers  81  to  83  such as a personal computer and a engineering workstation. It should be noted that the recording media  91  to  93  are divided into the medium which is different respectively and may make an identical medium. 
     As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to easily and quickly see whether the distribution of fault elements contained in the semiconductor integrated circuit contains a regular distribution or is an irregular distribution. As the result, it is possible to easily determine whether or not the faults of the semiconductor integrated circuit are caused based on the design. 
     Also, the data of the position coordinates of the fault elements are converted into the divisors of the position coordinate intervals and the expectation function. Therefore, the data indicative of the tendency of the fault elements contained in the semiconductor integrated circuit can be stored without restriction of the memory capacity. 
     Moreover, when the distribution of fault elements contained in the semiconductor integrated circuit is determined to contain a regular distribution, the period of the regular distribution can be easily and quickly found. 
     Moreover, it is possible to easily see how the regular distribution of fault elements of the semiconductor integrated circuit is. Especially, the change of the distributions of fault elements can be easily seen with respect to time by registering in the identifier data.