Abstract:
This invention is an aircraft orientation system that locates the earth&#39;s horizon, in order to determine the aircraft&#39;s attitude in the pitch and roll axes. The invention uses infrared sensors on the aircraft aimed to the sides, front and rear of the aircraft. These sensors are grouped in pairs, and detect the differences in heat levels between the left and right of the aircraft, and forward and behind the aircraft. The invention utilizes the physical condition that the earth&#39;s surface is typically measurably warmer than the sky. This difference is used to provide a reference for an aircraft regarding the attitude of the aircraft. In an alternative embodiment, a third pair of sensors detects the aircraft&#39;s vertical orientation (inverted/non-inverted) to the ground. The aircraft&#39;s attitude is determined by comparing the electrical outputs of infrared sensors, which can be used to provide a feedback to the aircraft control system to keep the aircraft in a neutral attitude. While this invention may have applications in a variety of aircraft, the preferred embodiment is described in radio controlled model airplanes and helicopters.

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     Not applicable. 
     STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT 
     Not applicable. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of Invention 
     This invention relates generally to an aircraft attitude and orientation control system. Specifically, the invention uses infrared sensors oriented about an aircraft to detect the comparative heat levels of the horizon. 
     The surface of the earth is typically measurably warmer than the sky due to the different heat capacities of air compared to land or water. This difference is used by the present invention to provide a reference for an aircraft regarding the horizontal attitude (pitch and roll) of the aircraft and its vertical orientation (inverted/non-inverted) to the ground. This reference is measured by comparing the electrical outputs of infrared sensors, which can be used to provide feedback to the aircraft control system to keep the aircraft in a neutral attitude (straight and level) and orientation (non-inverted). While this invention may have applications in a variety of aircraft, the preferred embodiment is described in radio controlled model airplanes and helicopters. 
     2. Related Art 
     Different sensor systems for application to controlling aircraft and spacecraft are known to the prior art. There are a variety of systems for aircraft that detect the aircraft&#39;s orientation, and then provide control feedback to keep the aircraft in its prior orientation. In full scale aircraft, these systems generally take the form of automatic flight control systems or autopilots, which utilize on-board acceleration detectors in the three orthogonal axes (lateral X, longitudinal Y, and vertical Z). They usually include built-in functions for guidance and flight direction using radio navigation, magnetic heading sensors and on-board acceleration data. However, such systems are expensive, technically complex and physically large and heavy. 
     There are also attitude sensor systems for satellite spacecraft. Illustrative of such methods and mechanisms is that disclosed in Doctor, U.S. Pat. No. 5,477,052 (&#39;052 patent), which discloses a method of using focused sensors for detecting the earth&#39;s horizon from space. The &#39;052 patent discloses an array sensor system to compensate for variations in the atmosphere when measuring IR emissions from the earth. These variations are caused by seasonal or geographic changes in the temperature or radiance of the Earth&#39;s surface. The &#39;052 patent is directed to a method of accurately locating the interface of cold space and earth, to provide a reference point for the satellite&#39;s attitude adjustment system. It does not disclose a terrestrial based system that uses the temperature gradient from land to sky to provide an orientation system. Further, the &#39;052 patent and those directed to satellite orientation systems detect the earth&#39;s horizon using a single field of view, and do not compare multiple fields of view to determine the satellite orientation. 
     A similar prior art for satellites is found in the patent issued to Diedrickson, U.S. Pat. No. 5,744,801 (&#39;081 patent), which discloses a dual array system space horizon detection system similar to the &#39;052 patent described above. The &#39;081 patent expressly uses pyroelectric sensor elements, which are capacitive in nature and require the incident radiant flux to be chopped or pulsed due to the voltage decay to zero due to current flow through the internal leakage resistance. In the present invention, the infrared sensors are thermopiles, which are voltage-generating devices acting as a pure resistance, and thus do not have such capacitive limitations. 
     There are also prior art systems using lightweight and compact systems for use in small scale and model aircraft. One type of system is rate based, measuring the rate of change in an aircraft&#39;s attitude to compute its orientation. One rate-based system uses an inertial solid state micro-miniature guidance system to sense angular rate in the three axes. Like mechanical gyroscope systems, these systems are initially accurate, but they require continuous on-board adjustment, typically through the use of software, to compensate for the earth&#39;s rotation of 15° per hour. They are expensive and have a relatively high power requirement, typically +12V at 250 mA. 
     Other pilot assist devices for model aircraft use position based systems that measure where the aircraft is relative to a physical reference point or area. One such position based systems uses a visible light reference. These systems operate on the assumption that the sky (up) is brighter then the earth (down). They typically use visible light sensors placed in orthogonal axes inside a translucent dome. A decrease in output levels from the sensors correlating to a decrease in relational light intensity is interpreted to be a deviation from level flight, and feedback signals are sent to the on-board control system. However, this system typically has noise from brightness on the earth. This “noise” is caused by different levels of brightness on the earth surface, which create an uneven light signature that is difficult for the system to read accurately. Furthermore, the system can obviously only be used in the daytime when the sun is clear and overhead. If used at sunrise or sunset, the system will roll the aircraft 90° in an attempt to orient itself to the sun on the horizon. The system is further limited to flying conditions over dry surfaces that are relatively non-reflective of visible light. 
     The prior art describes either a large and expensive system for full-scale aircraft, a narrowly focused system for spacecraft to detect along a single ray the space/earth horizon, or an inefficient or expensive system for measuring a small-scale aircraft&#39;s attitude. It would be a useful improvement of the prior art for an aircraft attitude measurement system to be lightweight, compact and inexpensive that provides on-board attitude feedback information that is rapidly updated, does not need to compensate for the earth&#39;s rotation, and can be used in the day or at night. This system could provide electrical information to assist in the control of small scale and model aircraft. To achieve such improvements, this invention uses commercially available pairs of inexpensive infrared sensors in an axial heat signature summation configuration. This system can then provide information to an automatic feedback control system, or to update the calibration of a gyroscope based system. 
     BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     Accordingly, the objectives of this invention are to provide, inter alia, a new and improved aircraft attitude sensor and control that: 
     measures the attitude of an aircraft; 
     uses infrared sensors that can be used in day or night; 
     has the capability of providing automatic feedback to an on-board aircraft control system; 
     has the capability of detecting and/or reversing inverted flight; 
     has the capability of telecommunicating attitude information; and 
     can be remotely disengaged. 
     To achieve these objectives, this invention uses infrared sensors oriented in pairs on at least one orthogonal axis, to measure the heat signature of a large field of view. These fields of view are oriented in a conical zone facing opposite directions on each axis and detect a sum of heat signatures from cooler sky and warmer earth surface. Equivalent readings from each sensor indicates that their fields of view are oriented such that first sensor is detecting the same amount of cool sky and warm earth as the second sensor in the pair, thus the two sensors are aligned on a line parallel with the horizon. By placing two pairs of sensors on two axes that are orthogonal, either physically or through the use of offset compensation (electronic and/or software based), sufficient information is generated to describe the pitch and roll attitude of the aircraft. By adding a third pair of sensors in the vertical plane, the inverted/non-inverted orientation of the aircraft can similarly be determined as described below. 
     In a typical embodiment of this invention, the sensors are used to provide autopilot assist control for a radio controlled model aircraft. The outputs from these sensors are electrically processed, typically with differential amplifiers. This processed output is then input into an electronic circuit that combines the processed output with the output signal from the aircraft&#39;s radio control receiver, and then sends this combined signal to the model aircraft&#39;s control surface servos (servomotors). 
     Other objects of the invention will become apparent from time to time throughout the specification hereinafter disclosed. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     FIG. 1 is an environmental drawing showing an explanatory placement of the sensor system on a fixed wing aircraft. 
     FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing sensor and feedback logic for an aircraft roll control feedback loop. 
     FIG. 3 is a flow chart showing sensor and feedback logic for aircraft pitch control feedback loop. 
     FIG. 4 is a graph showing the pitch angle and the subtracted signal output of the infrared sensors. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     The new and improved aircraft attitude sensor and control system is shown generally in FIGS. 1-4. In general, attitude sensor system  10  comprises at least one pair of infrared sensors, each sensor comprising an infrared light receptor  26  and an electrical output, oriented along at least one of the three orthogonal axes (X, Y and Z). Each infrared light receptor  26  is responsive to electromagnetic radiation in the infrared spectrum, preferably in the wavelength range of 2-100 micrometers. 
     FIG. 1 shows an illustrative orientation of attitude sensor system  10  relative to aircraft  30 . While this and other illustrative descriptions of the example show and describe aircraft  30  as a single fixed wing aircraft, the disclosure and claims of this invention apply to all aircraft, comprising helicopters, lighter than air aircraft, motorized and non-motorized hang gliders, motorized and non-motorized parasails, hovercraft, fan propulsion aircraft and model aircraft of all types. While aircraft  30  is typically illustrated in this description as a fixed wing aircraft using ailerons to control roll and elevators to control pitch, a helicopter or other aircraft&#39;s equivalent attitude control means, control linkages and control surfaces, using those known in the art of aviation, can be controlled or manipulated using this invention. 
     Attitude orientation system  10  is attached to a mountable surface  60  of aircraft  30 . The mountable surface  60  lies generally in a plane parallel to the earth&#39;s surface when aircraft  30  is in level flight (neutral pitch and roll). Typically, attitude sensor system  10  detects pitch and roll independently, utilizing discrete electrical circuitry branches to process information from the axes corresponding to pitch and roll. For illustrative purposes however, the axes will be described independently. Further, sensor  22  and sensor  23  are shown aligned with aircraft  30 &#39;s longitudinal horizontal axis while sensor  20  and sensor  21  are shown aligned with aircraft  30 &#39;s transverse horizontal axis to demonstrate the invention&#39;s concept. In practice, each pair of sensors (sensor  22  with sensor  23  and sensor  20  with sensor  21 ) typically are oriented on the fuselage to provide full fields of view in the transverse views, and on a wing for longitudinal views to avoid engine heat signatures. Alternatively, the two pairs of sensors can be mounted in the same location, and offset from their respective horizontal axis to avoid infrared readings from nose mounted or wing mounted engines. In the preferred embodiment, all sensors are mounted within the frame of aircraft  30 , and infrared light receptors  26  are oriented through an opening in the aircraft frame or through a material that is transparent to infrared electromagnetic radiation. 
     To detect roll in aircraft  30  in FIG. 1, infrared light receptor  26  of infrared sensor  20  faces to the left of aircraft  30  and infrared light receptor  26  of infrared sensor  21  faces to the right of aircraft  30 . In the preferred embodiment, infrared sensor  20  and infrared sensor  21  are oriented on a single axis parallel to the transverse axis of aircraft  30 . The conical fields of view  25  of infrared sensor  20  and infrared sensor  21  are in the range of 1° to 359°, preferably equal for both sensors and preferably in the range of 70° to 100°. Changes in vertical fields of view  25  for infrared sensor  20  and infrared sensor  21  result in changes of electrical output from the sensors. In the preferred embodiment, an increase in infrared radiation detected by a sensor results in a corresponding increase in voltage output from the same sensor. When aircraft  30  is in level flight over level terrain, infrared sensor  20  and infrared sensor  21  detect equivalent levels of infrared radiation. When the non-inverted level aircraft rolls in one direction, such as to the left with left wing  55  dipping downward and right wing  56  lifting upward, infrared sensor  20  detects more of the warmer ground and less of the cooler sky, while infrared sensor  21  detects more of the cooler sky and less of the warmer ground. As shown in FIG. 2, this results in an increase in the electrical output  120  from infrared sensor  20 , and a decrease in the electrical output  121  from infrared sensor  21 . 
     Output comparator  130  then functionally processes the differences in electrical output  120  and electrical output  121 . In a first embodiment, output comparator  130  comprises circuitry that uses a first differential amplifier, preferably a high gain operational amplifier (Op-amp), to provide a positive or negative voltage quantifiably descriptive of electrical output  120  and electrical output  121 . By way of example, if electrical output  120  is greater than electrical output  121 , and electrical output  120  is functionally connected to the non-inverting input of the first differential amplifier and electrical output  121  is functionally connected to the inverting input of the same differential amplifier, then the output of the first differential amplifier would be a positive (or relatively greater in a single voltage differential amplifier) voltage proportional to the voltage difference between electrical output  120  and electrical output  121 . Conversely, if aircraft  30  rolls to the right with right wing  56  dipping downward, electrical output  121  would be greater than electrical output  120 , and the output of the first differential amplifier would be a negative (or lesser in a single voltage differential amplifier) voltage proportional to the voltage difference between electrical output  120  and electrical output  121 . A positive output from the first differential amplifier (resulting from infrared sensor  21  being directed toward the sky due to a left roll of the aircraft) results in an aircraft control response described in control block  180  that rolls the aircraft to the right, typically through control of ailerons  40 . A negative output from the first differential amplifier (resulting from infrared sensor  20  being directed toward the sky due to a right roll of the aircraft) results in an aircraft control response described in control block  170  that rolls the aircraft to the left. 
     In an alternative embodiment, the output from output comparator  130  is amplified using a microelectronic amplifier, whose output is fed directly to an analog aileron control surface servo (servomotor) or electromagnetically controlled aileron control surface for roll control. Likewise, the output from output comparator  230  may be amplified and fed directly to an analog elevator control surface servo or electromagnetically controlled aileron control surface for pitch control. 
     To control the pitch of example aircraft  30  in FIG. 1, infrared light receptor  26  of infrared sensor  22  faces to in front of aircraft  30  and infrared light receptor  26  of infrared sensor  23  faces behind aircraft  30 . The system is analogous to that found in the sensing and control of roll in aircraft  30 . In the preferred embodiment, infrared sensor  22  and infrared sensor  23  are oriented on a single axis parallel to the longitudinal axis of aircraft  30 . The conical field of view  25  of infrared sensor  22  and infrared sensor  23  are in the range of 1° to 359°, preferably equal for both sensors and preferably in the range of 70° to 100°. Changes in vertical fields of view  25  for infrared sensor  22  and infrared sensor  23  result in changes of electrical output from the sensors. In the preferred embodiment, an increase in infrared radiation detected by a sensor results in a corresponding increase in voltage output from the same sensor. When aircraft  30  is in level flight over level terrain, infrared sensor  22  and infrared sensor  23  detect equivalent levels of infrared radiation to the front and rear (disregarding through electronic circuitry or software the heat from an engine, if applicable). When the non-inverted level aircraft pitches in one direction, such as nose down, infrared sensor  22  detects more of the warmer ground and less of the cooler sky, while infrared sensor  23  detects less of the warmer ground and more of the cooler sky. As shown in FIG. 3, this would result in an increase in electrical output  222  from infrared sensor  22 , and an decrease in electrical output  223  from infrared sensor  23 . 
     Output comparator  230  then functionally processes the differences in electrical output  222  and electrical output  223 . In the first embodiment, output comparator  230  comprises circuitry that uses a second differential amplifier, preferably a high gain operational amplifier (Op-amp), to provide a positive or negative voltage quantifiably descriptive of electrical output  222  and electrical output  223 . By way of example, if aircraft  30  pitches forward (nose down in non-inverted flight), then electrical output  222  is more than electrical output  223 . With electrical output  222  functionally connected to the non-inverting input of the second differential amplifier and electrical output  223  functionally connected to the inverting input of the same second differential amplifier, then the output of the second differential amplifier would be a positive voltage proportional to the voltage difference between electrical output  222  and electrical output  223 . Conversely, if aircraft  30  pitches upward (nose up), electrical output  222  would be less than electrical output  223 , and the output of the second differential amplifier would be a negative voltage proportional to the voltage difference between electrical output  222  and electrical output  223 . A positive output from the second differential amplifier (resulting from infrared sensor  22  being directed toward the ground due to a nose down attitude of aircraft  30 ) results in an aircraft control response described in control block  280  that pulls the nose of non-inverted aircraft  30  up, typically through control of elevators  50 . A negative output from the differential amplifier (resulting from infrared sensor  22  being directed toward the sky due to a climb by aircraft  30 ) results in an aircraft control response described in control block  270  that pushes the nose down. 
     FIG. 4 shows a graph of sensor comparator output  230  and the aircraft pitch angle when aircraft  30  performs a forward roll. With a sensor view angle  25  of 180°, this graph is sinusoidal, allowing accurate pitch angle to be determined (preferably using trigonometric functions in the preferred embodiment&#39;s microprocessor) from the sensor voltage difference. The maximum and minimum voltages shown in FIG. 4 are typically equal in magnitude, and are calibrated for weather and temperature conditions at flight time. When the aircraft is in level non-inverted flight, differential amplifier comparator output  230  is zero, since infrared sensor  22  (aimed ahead of aircraft  30 ) electrical output  222  (connected to the non-inverting input) and infrared sensor  23  (aimed behind aircraft  30 ) electrical output  223  (connected to the inverting input) are equal. As aircraft  30  noses down, electrical output  222  increases due to increased ground heat being detected by infrared sensor  22 . When aircraft  30  is aimed straight down towards the earth, electrical output  222  is at its maximum and electrical output  223  is at its minimum, thus the peak positive voltage output of comparator output  230  results. As aircraft  30  continues a forward roll, electrical output  222  decreases and electrical output  223  increases until the plane is level and inverted, electrical output  222  and electrical output  223  are once again equal, and the voltage of comparator output  230  is zero. As aircraft  30  continues the forward roll and begins aiming skyward (aircraft  30  inverted), electrical output  222  decreases and electrical output  223  increases as aircraft  30  climbs, until aircraft  30  is in a total vertical climb, and electrical output  222  is at its minimum and electrical output  223  (connected to the inverting input of the differential amplifier) is at its maximum. Comparator output  230  produces a maximum negative voltage when aircraft  30  is in a straight up vertical climb. As aircraft  30  continues past the top of the forward loop, electrical output  222  increases and electrical output  223  decreases until they are once again equal in level non-inverted flight, and comparator output  230  once again has a zero voltage. 
     The feedback control systems shown in lateral axis feedback control system  190  and longitudinal axis feedback control system  290  are typically continuous, with a refresh rate based on the response rate of the sensor outputs. The preferred range of the sensor output response rate is 1-100 milliseconds. 
     The information developed from the pairs of sensors can be utilized in a feedback pilot assist system as described above and below. This same electronic information can also be displayed, either through a visual display or an aural display, remotely or on the aircraft. Typically, such a visual display is provided using seven-segment or matrix LED&#39;s or LCD&#39;s to show angle of climb or descent (positive or negative pitch) or angle of roll (left or right). However, any visual or aural (e.g. digitized synthetic voice processor) median may be used to represent the aircraft orientation. 
     In the preferred embodiment of the aircraft attitude sensor and control system, lateral axis feedback control system  190  and longitudinal axis feedback control system  290  are microprocessor based. Another preferred feature of this embodiment is the utilization of a third pair (depicted in FIG. 1 as upward sensor  71  and downward sensor  72 ) of infrared sensors attached to a mountable surface on aircraft  30  that is normal to the earth&#39;s surface when aircraft is in straight and level flight. This third pair of infrared sensors provide information regarding the inverted/non-inverted orientation of the aircraft. Using the same thermal principals (cooler sky and warmer ground), sensor characteristics (higher voltage output from higher infrared light input) and comparator characteristics (differential amplifier, preferably a high gain Operational Amplifier, with quantitative positive or negative voltages, or alternatively lesser and greater positive voltages in a single voltage differential amplifier) as described above for the pitch and roll of the aircraft, the third pair of sensors detect whether the aircraft is inverted or non-inverted. If the aircraft is non-inverted, the top sensor is oriented towards the cooler sky and the bottom sensor toward the warmer ground, resulting in a (typically) positive (or greater in a single voltage differential amplifier) output from the differential amplifier. If the aircraft crosses the horizontal plane (either in pitch or roll) into an inverted orientation, the bottom sensor will be oriented more towards the cooler sky and the top sensor will be oriented more towards the warmer ground, resulting in a negative (or lesser in a single voltage differential amplifier) output from the differential amplifier. This change in differential amplifier output polarity (or relative voltage level) provides information to the feedback control system that aircraft  30  is inverted, and therefore pitch and roll control surfaces must be controlled inversely with respect to the ground. When the aircraft is in inverted flight, pitch, roll and yaw controls must likewise be inverted. That is, when the aircraft is inverted, a signal to an elevator control surface to go “up” will obviously cause the aircraft to go “down” towards the earth. Likewise, “left” becomes “right” and “right” becomes “left” when controlling the position of the aircraft as compared to normal control commands. To compensate for this, the preferred embodiment&#39;s software detects the presence of inverted flight. When the aircraft is inverted, commands from the radio control receiver are reversed, such that remote commands to turn a specified direction are followed by the aircraft whether inverted or not. 
     In the preferred embodiment of the aircraft attitude sensor and control system utilizing a microprocessor, inputs from all three pairs of infrared sensors are first processed through their own differential amplifiers as described above, with the resulting outputs input into an analog to digital converter (ADC). The output of the ADC is input into the microprocessor. The output from sensor  22  and sensor  23  are subtracted and the result is used in a pitch feedback loop. A true pitch angle to the horizon is obtained by the formula:          Pitch                 Angle     =     arc                   tangent        (         sensor                 22                 output                -                sensor                 23                 output           sensor                 71                 output                -                sensor                 72                 output         )                                
     Similarly, the roll angle to the horizon is obtained by the formula:          Roll                 Angle     =     arc                   tangent        (         sensor                 20                 output                -                sensor                 21                 output           sensor                 71                 output                -                sensor                 72                 output         )                                
     The microprocessor then outputs a signal to the control surface controllers, typically servos in a model aircraft, through a pulse width modulator, demultiplexer and/or digital to analog converter (DAC). If the control system is used on a remote controlled aircraft, the microprocessor also receives input from the remote control radio receiver to integrate control input from the operator with the orientation sensor outputs. 
     In an alternative embodiment, the output from the infrared sensors is processed by differential amplifiers as described above, but the outputs of the differential amplifiers are input into an analog circuit between the remote control radio receiver and an analog control surface servo using electronic circuitry known in the field of electronics. 
     In both the preferred embodiment and alternative embodiment described for processing the output signals of the sensors, the sensors are typically used to provide autopilot assist control for a radio controlled model aircraft. The outputs from these sensors are electrically processed as described above, and this processed output is then input into an electronic circuit, preferably microprocessor based using technology well known in the field of electronics, that combines the processed output with the output signal from the aircraft&#39;s radio control receiver, and then sends this combined signal to the model aircraft&#39;s control surface servos. 
     While this invention is described for clarity at using distinct pairs of infrared sensors, in an alternative embodiment the pairs can use one shared sensor. In one such embodiment, three sensors are aligned roughly orthogonal on the X, Y and Z axes. For purposes of illustration, if the Y-axis sensor is oriented to look upward from aircraft  30  in level non-inverted flight, the X-axis sensor is oriented to look to one side of aircraft  30 , and the Z-axis is oriented to look in front of aircraft  30 , then the following calculations can be performed. If the Y-axis sensor detects an increase in ground heat, the aircraft is either in a pitch or roll. If the X-axis sensor is oriented to the left of the aircraft, a roll to the left results in an increase in the electrical output of X-axis sensor, while a roll to the right results in a decrease in the electrical output of the X-axis sensor. Pitch is detected when the Y-axis sensor detects more ground heat, and the Z-axis sensor detects more ground heat (dive) or less ground heat (climb). The attitude of aircraft  30  is electrically represented by a change comparator. When the Y-axis detects a change in attitude, a change comparator compares the change in both the X-axis sensor and Z-axis sensor to electrically represent the attitude of aircraft  30 . This electrical representation can be input into a display and/or control means of aircraft  30  in a similar manner as previously described. This alternative embodiment functions equivalently if the Y-axis sensor is oriented toward the ground from the aircraft during level inverted flight. 
     In another alternative embodiment, one sensor can be used to detect only roll of aircraft  30 . One sensor can be oriented to either the left or right side of the aircraft aligned on an axis normal to the longitudinal axis of aircraft  30  and normal to the earth&#39;s surface when aircraft  30  is in level non-inverted flight. As the sensor detects more or less heat when the aircraft rolls, this change in heat detected is converted into an electrical signal output representing aircraft  30 &#39;s roll orientation, as described in the preferred embodiment, and the signal output represented aurally or visually and/or input into the aircraft control system in a similar manner as described in the preferred embodiment. 
     Finally, the control system is capable of being quickly disengaged. This disengagement is in the form of an override switch activated remotely. In the preferred embodiment, this disengagement is performed through software in a microprocessor. A signal is sent from the remote pilot to the receiver of the model aircraft signaling the microprocessor to stop processing inputs from the sensors, and allow throughput control from the radio receiver to the control servos. Alternatively, this disengagement is a double throw switch that in normal operation connects the microprocessor (which receives input from the radio receiver and infrared sensors) with the control servos, and in disengagement mode switches to bypass the microprocessor and completes the electrical circuit directly between the radio receiver and the control servos. The double throw switch is typically moved through a servo mechanical movement. However, the break can also be performed electronically through standard circuitry that detects a failure in the sensor or the sensor/feedback means. 
     The foregoing disclosure and description of the invention is illustrative and explanatory thereof. Various changes in the details of the illustrated construction may be made within the scope of the appended claims without departing from the spirit of the invention. The present invention should only be limited by the following claims and their legal equivalents.