Abstract:
The invention relates to a process for the manufacture of a thermoplastic composition comprising a polyphenylene ether resin and a styrenic resin wherein the processes comprises a concentrate of polyphenylene ether resin with an organic phosphate compound. The concentrate allows for ease of handling of polyphenylene ether resin without the risk of dust ignition while obtaining substantially the same physical properties as obtained with polyphenylene ether resin powder.  
     The invention also relates to articles formed out of the compositions made by the process of the invention.

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS  
         [0001]    Not applicable.  
         FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH  
         [0002]    Not applicable.  
         BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
         [0003]    1. Field of the Invention  
           [0004]    The invention relates to a process for the manufacture of a thermoplastic composition comprising a polyphenylene ether resin and optionally, a styrenic resin wherein the processes comprises a concentrate of polyphenylene ether resin with an organic phosphate compound. The concentrate comprises less than about 1% by weight particles less than about 75 microns in size, and preferably essentially no particles less than about 75 microns in size. The concentrate allows for ease of handling of polyphenylene ether resin without the risk of dust ignition while obtaining substantially the same physical properties as obtained with polyphenylene ether resin powder.  
           [0005]    The invention also relates to articles formed out of the compositions made by the process of the invention.  
           [0006]    2. Brief Description of the Related Art  
           [0007]    Poly(phenylene ether) resins (referred to hereafter as “PPE”) are commercially attractive materials because of their unique combination of physical, chemical, and electrical properties. Commercially, most PPE are sold as blends with predominantly high impact polystyrene resins. PPE are miscible with polystyrene resins in all proportions and because of the very high glass transition temperatures of PPE, the blends of PPE with polystyrene resins possess higher heat resistance than that of the polystyrene resins alone. Moreover, the combination of PPE with high impact polystyrene resins results in additional overall properties such as high flow and ductility. Examples of such blends can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,383,435; 4,097,550; 4,113,800; 4,101,503; 4,101,504; 4,101,505; 4,128,602; 4,139,574; and 4,154,712 among others. The properties of these blends can be further enhanced by the addition of various additives such as impact modifiers, flame retardants, light stabilizers, processing stabilizers, heat stabilizers, antioxidants and fillers.  
           [0008]    Commercial PPE are produced as a relatively fine powder form typically having at least 10% by weight, often at least 20% by weight fine particles of less than about 75 microns in size. Particles less than about 75 microns in size are believed to lead to dust explosion hazards. Consequently these powders require special handling procedures to control dust and potential spark ignition hazards associated with such powders. Such handling procedures include grounding of equipment and use of inert gas blankets to exclude oxygen. It would be commercially advantageous to be able to ship PPE to various locations around the world for compounding into resin compositions to would serve local market needs. However, the handling procedures as described above require significant investment for equipment modifications and consequently limit the commercial feasibility for such compounding flexibility. Conversion of PPE powder using standard compounding extruders followed by pelletization of the extrudate to obtain pellets having dimensions of about 3 mm by 3 mm has been attempted a solution to the problems associated by PPE powder. Unfortunately, the physical properties of many resin compositions made using the pellets are inferior as compared to control compositions made with PPE powder and the pellets must be ground to a smaller size in order to obtain physical properties that closely approximate those of control compositions. Consequently, the utility of the PPE pellet approach has been limited.  
           [0009]    It is therefore apparent there continues to be a need for improved processes to manufacture resin compositions containing PPE.  
         SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
         [0010]    The needs discussed above have been generally satisfied by the discovery of a process for the manufacture of a thermoplastic composition containing:  
           [0011]    a) at least one polyphenylene ether resin, and  
           [0012]    b) optionally, at least one polystyrene resin;  
           [0013]    wherein the process comprises a concentrate of polyphenylene ether resin with an organic phosphate compound. The composition may further comprise at least of the following optional components: thermoplastic resins such as, for example, polyolefins, polyetherimides, polyethersulfones, polysulfones, polyamides, polyesters, and polyarylene sulfides, compatibilizers, impact modifiers, anti-oxidants, flame retardants, drip suppressers, crystallization nucleators, dyes, pigments, colorants, reinforcing agents, fillers, stabilizers, and antistatic agents.  
           [0014]    The description which follows provides further details regarding this invention.  
         DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS.  
         [0015]    Not applicable.  
         DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION  
         [0016]    Polyphenylene ether resin, hereinafter “PPE”, per se, are known polymers comprising a plurality of structural units of the formula (I):  
                         
 
           [0017]    wherein for each structural unit, each Q 1  is independently halogen, primary or secondary lower alkyl (e.g., alkyl containing up to 7 carbon atoms), phenyl, haloalkyl, aminoalkyl, hydrocarbonoxy, or halohydrocarbonoxy wherein at least two carbon atoms separate the halogen and oxygen atoms; and each Q 2  is independently hydrogen, halogen, primary or secondary lower alkyl, phenyl, haloalkyl, hydrocarbonoxy or halohydrocarbonoxy as defined for Q 1 . Preferably, each Q 1  is alkyl or phenyl, especially C 1-4  alkyl, and each Q 2  is hydrogen.  
           [0018]    Both homopolymer and copolymer PPE are included. The preferred homopolymers are those containing 2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene ether units. Suitable copolymers include random copolymers containing, for example, such units in combination with 2,3,6-trimethyl-1,4-phenylene ether units. Also included are PPE containing moieties prepared by grafting vinyl monomers or polymers such as polystyrenes, as well as coupled PPE in which coupling agents such as low molecular weight polycarbonates, quinones, heterocycles and formals undergo reaction in known manner with the hydroxy groups of two PPE chains to produce a higher molecular weight polymer.  
           [0019]    It will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing that the PPE contemplated for use in the present invention include all those presently known, irrespective of variations in structural units or ancillary chemical features.  
           [0020]    The PPE generally have an intrinsic viscosity often between about 0.10-0.60 dl./g., preferably in the range of about 0.25-0.48 dl./g., all as measured in chloroform at 25° C. It is also possible to utilize a high intrinsic viscosity PPE and a low intrinsic viscosity PPE in combination. Determining an exact ratio, when two intrinsic viscosities are used, will depend somewhat on the exact intrinsic viscosities of the PPE used and the ultimate physical properties that are desired.  
           [0021]    The PPE resin compositions of the present invention optionally contain at least one nonelastomeric polymer of an alkenylaromatic compound. Suitable polymers of this type may be prepared by methods known in the art including bulk, suspension and emulsion polymerization. They generally contain at least about 25% by weight of structural units derived from an alkenylaromatic monomer of the formula (II):  
                         
 
           [0022]    wherein G is hydrogen, lower alkyl or halogen; Z is vinyl, halogen or lower alkyl; and p is from 0 to 5. These resins include homopolymers of styrene, chlorostyrene and vinyltoluene, random copolymers of styrene with one or more monomers illustrated by acrylonitrile, butadiene, α-methylstyrene, ethylvinylbenzene, divinylbenzene and maleic anhydride, and rubber-modified polystyrenes comprising blends and grafts, wherein the rubber is a polybutadiene or a rubbery copolymer of about 98-68% styrene and about 2-32% diene monomer. These rubber modified polystyrenes include high impact polystyrene (commonly referred to as HIPS). Non-elastomeric block copolymer compositions of styrene and butadiene can also be used that have linear block, radial block or tapered block copolymer architectures. They are commercially available from such companies as Fina Oil as under the trademark FINACLEAR and Phillips under the trademark K-RESINS.  
           [0023]    The amount of the polymer of a nonelastomeric alkenylaromatic compound, when one is used, is an amount effective to improve the flow and processability of the composition. Improved flow can be indicated by reduced viscosity or reduced injection pressures needed to fill a part during an injection molding process. Generally, the nonelastomeric alkenylaromatic compound is utilized in the range of about 20% to about 60% by weight based on the total weight of the composition. The preferred range is about 30% to about 60% by weight; based on the total weight of the composition.  
           [0024]    The compositions of the present invention may also contain at least one impact modifier. The impact modifier may be used alone or in combination with a nonelastomeric alkenylaromatic compound. The impact modifiers include block (typically diblock, triblock or radial teleblock) copolymers of alkenyl aromatic compounds and dienes. Most often at least one block is derived from styrene and at least one block from at least one of butadiene and isoprene. Especially preferred are the triblock and diblock copolymers comprising polystyrene blocks and diene derived blocks wherein the aliphatic unsaturation has been preferentially removed with hydrogenation. Mixtures of various copolymers are also sometimes useful. The weight average molecular weights of the impact modifiers are typically in the range of about 50,000 to 300,000. Block copolymers of this type are available commercially from a number of sources, including Phillips Petroleum under the trademark SOLPRENE, Shell Chemical Co. under the trademark KRATON, and Kuraray under the trademark SEPTON.  
           [0025]    Various mixtures of the aforementioned impact modifiers are also sometimes useful. The amount of the impact modifier generally present, when one is used, is an amount effective to improve the physical properties, for example, the ductility of the composition when compared to the same composition without an impact modifier. Improved ductility can be indicated by increased impact strength, increased tensile elongation to break, or both increased impact strength and increased tensile elongation to break Generally, when an impact modifier is present, it is utilized in the range of about 1% to about 20% by weight based on the total weight of the composition. A preferred range is about 1% to about 8% by weight; based on the total weight of the composition. The exact amount and types or combinations of impact modifiers utilized will depend in part on the requirements needed in the final blend composition.  
           [0026]    Organic phosphate compounds are another component of the present invention. The organic phosphate is preferably an aromatic phosphate compound of the formula (III):  
                         
 
           [0027]    where R is the same or different and is alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, alkyl substituted aryl, halogen substituted aryl, aryl substituted alkyl, halogen, or a combination of any of the foregoing, provided at least one R is aryl.  
           [0028]    Examples include phenyl bisdodecyl phosphate, phenylbisneopentyl phosphate, phenyl-bis(3,5,5′-tri-methyl-hexyl phosphate), ethyldiphenyl phosphate, 2-ethyl-hexyldi(p-tolyl) phosphate, bis-(2-ethylhexyl) p-tolylphosphate, tritolyl phosphate, bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phenyl phosphate, tri-(nonylphenyl) phosphate, di(dodecyl) p-tolyl phosphate, tricresyl phosphate, triphenyl phosphate, dibutylphenyl phosphate, 2-chloroethyldiphenyl phosphate, p-tolyl bis(2,5,5′-trimethylhexyl) phosphate, 2-ethylhexyldiphenyl phosphate, and the like. The preferred phosphates are those in which each R is aryl. Especially preferred is triphenyl phosphate, which may be either unsubstituted or substituted, for example, isopropylated triphenyl phosphate.  
           [0029]    Alternatively, the organic phosphate can be a di- or polyfunctional compound or polymer having the formula  
                         
 
           [0030]    or  
                         
 
           [0031]    or  
                         
 
           [0032]    including mixtures thereof, in which R 1 , R 3  and R 5  are, independently, hydrocarbon; R 2 , R 4 , R 6  and R 7  are, independently, hydrocarbon or hydrocarbonoxy; X 1 , X 2  and X 3  are halogen; m and r are 0 or integers from 1 to 4, and n and p are from 1 to 30.  
           [0033]    Examples include the bis diphenyl phosphates of resorcinol, hydroquinone and bisphenol-A, respectively, or their polymeric counterparts.  
           [0034]    Methods for the preparation of the aforementioned di- and polyfunctional aromatic phosphates are described in British Patent No. 2,043,083.  
           [0035]    Another development is the use of certain cyclic phosphates, for example, diphenyl pentaerythritol diphosphate, as a flame retardant agent for polyphenylene ether resins, as is described by Axelrod in U.S. Pat. No. 4,254,775.  
           [0036]    Also suitable as flame-retardant additives for this invention are compounds containing phosphorus-nitrogen bonds, such as phosphonitrilic chloride, phosphorus ester amides, phosphoric acid amides, phosphonic acid amides, phosphinic acid amides, tris(aziridinyl) phosphine oxide, or tetrakis(hydroxymethyl) phosphonium chloride. These flame-retardant additives are commercially available.  
           [0037]    Preferred phosphate flame retardants include those based upon resorcinol such as, for example, resorcinol tetraphenyl diphosphate, as well as those based upon bis-phenols such as, for example, bis-phenol A tetraphenyl diphosphate. Phosphates containing substituted phenyl groups are also preferred. In an especially preferred embodiment, the organophosphate is selected from the group consisting of butylated triphenyl phosphate ester, resorcinol tetraphenyl diphosphate, bis-phenol A tetraphenyl diphosphate, and mixtures containing at least one of the foregoing.  
           [0038]    In the preparation of the concentrate of PPE with the organic phosphate it is desirable to have a relatively large amount of the organic phosphate present so as to result in a high value concentrate. By high value is meant that the concentrate can be let-down to a relatively large degree in order to prepare a wide variety of final formulations from a single concentrate composition. It is preferred that the concentrate contain at least 5%, preferably at least 15%, and most preferably at least about 20% or more organic phosphate compound by weight based upon the weight of the PPE. The maximum amount of phosphate compound that can be present can also vary widely and is generally limited by the maximum amount that can be added before the concentrates becomes sticky and begins to agglomerate. This amount of generally less than about 50% by weight of organic phosphate based on the total weight of the PPE/organic phosphate concentrate.  
           [0039]    In the final composition, the flame retardant is present in at least the minimum amount necessary to impart a degree of flame retardancy to the composition to pass the UL-94 protocol at a rating of V-0, V-1, or V-2 depending on the specific application requirements. The particular amount will vary, depending on the molecular weight of the organic phosphate, the amount of the flammable resin present and possibly other normally flammable ingredients which might also be included in the composition.  
           [0040]    For compositions comprising polyphenylene ether resin, preferred compositions have the major components which make up the composition in an amount within the following preferred ranges:  
           [0041]    Polyphenylene ether resin, (a) about 30 to about 70 parts;  
           [0042]    Non-elastomeric polymer of an alkenylaromatic compound, (b) about 20 to about 60 parts; and  
           [0043]    Organic phosphate, (c) about 10 to about 30 parts;  
           [0044]    based on 100 parts by weight of (a), (b), and (c) together.  
           [0045]    Compositions of the present invention can also include effective amounts of at least one additive selected from the group consisting of thermoplastic resins such as, for example, polyolefins, polyetherimides, polyethersulfones, polysulfones, polyamides, polyesters, and polyarylene sulfides, compatibilizers, impact modifiers, anti-oxidants, drip retardants, crystallization nucleators, dyes, pigments, colorants, synergists, reinforcing agents, fillers, stabilizers, and antistatic agents. These additives are known in the art, as are their effective levels and methods of incorporation. Effective amounts of the additives vary widely, but they are usually present in an amount up to about 60% or more by weight, based on the weight of the entire composition.  
           [0046]    The resin compositions used in the present invention can be prepared by a variety of methods involving intimate admixing of the materials with any additional additives desired in the formulation. Suitable procedures include solution blending and melt blending. Because of the availability of melt blending equipment in commercial polymer processing facilities, melt processing procedures are generally preferred. Examples of equipment used in such melt compounding methods include: co-rotating and counter-rotating extruders, single screw extruders, disc-pack processors and various other types of extrusion equipment. In some instances, the compounded material exits the extruder through small exit holes in a die and the resulting strands of molten resin are cooled by passing the strands through a water bath. The cooled strands can be chopped into small pellets for packaging and further handling.  
           [0047]    All of the ingredients may be added initially to the processing system, or else certain additives may be pre-compounded with each other as in the case of the concentrates of the present disclosure. It is sometimes advantageous to introduce the organic phosphate compound as a liquid into the compounder through the use, for example, of a liquid injection system as is known in the compounding art. It is also sometimes advantageous to employ at least one vent port in each section between the feed ports to allow venting (either atmospheric or vacuum) of the melt. Those of ordinary skill in the art will be able to adjust blending times and temperatures, as well as component addition location and sequence, without undue additional experimentation.  
           [0048]    It should also be clear that improved molded articles prepared from the compositions of the present invention represent an additional embodiment of this invention.  
           [0049]    All patents cited by reference are incorporated by reference herein. 
       
    
    
       [0050]    The following examples are provided to illustrate some embodiments of the present invention. They are not intended to limit the invention in any aspect. All percentages are by weight based on the total weight of the entire composition, unless otherwise indicated.  
       EXPERIMENTAL  
       [0051]    The following examples are illustrative of the compositions of the present invention.  
         [0052]    Compositions were evaluated comparing PPE in the form of (1) powder (control), (2) ground into a particle size of less than about 3 mm by about 3 mm, (3) pellets having a size of about 1 mm by 3 mm (mini), and (4) pellets having a size of 3 mm by 3 mm (regular). To contrast the compositions derived directly from PPE, concentrates of PPE with either HIPS or a phosphate flame retardant (e.g., tetraphenyl resorcinol diphosphate: “RDP”) were also evaluated as either pellets having a size of 3 mm by 3 mm (regular), or alternatively as ground into a particle size of less than about 3 mm by about 3 mm. The energy input into the PPE was varied as “high” by addition of the PPE into the first barrel of an eleven barrel twin-screw extruder, or “low” by addition of the PPE into the seventh barrel of an eleven barrel twin-screw extruder. The I.V. of the PPE was varied between 0.33, 0.40, and 0.46. The standard final formulation was as follows with all parts by weight: PPE: 41.75; HIPS: 37.22; tetraphenyl resorcinol diphosphate: 17.6; polystyrene-poly(butadiene)-polystyrene block copolymer: 1.7; LLDPE: 1.1; tridecylphosphite: 0.39; ZnO: 0.1; ZnS: 0.1: TSAN: 0.2.  
         [0053]    The compositions were extruded on a Werner-Pfleiderer twin-screw extruder at a temperature of about 280-320° C. with vacuum applied to the melt during compounding. For concentrates, the vacuum level is typically low, e.g., 0 to about 3 inches. For final compositions, the vacuum level is typically higher, e.g., about 3 to about 30 inches. The resultant compositions were molded using a van Dorn injection molding machine using a temperature set of about 275-300° C. and a mold temperature of about 80-110° C. Samples of the compositions were also subjected to measurement of notched Izod impact strength according to ASTM D256 (employing a sample size of 2.5 inch by 0.5 inch by 0.125 inch), Dynatup (energy to fracture, falling dart test) strength according to ASTM D3763 (using 4 inch diameter by 0.125 inch disks), flexural modulus and flexural strength according to ASTM D790 (employing a sample size of 6 inch by 0.5 inch by 0.25 inch), and tensile yield and tensile elongation at break according to ASTM D638.  
                                               TABLE 1                           Sample           1   2   3   4   5   6               Energy Input           High   Low   High   Low   High   Low       PPE IV           0.33   0.33   0.4   0.4   0.46   0.46       Pellet Type 1             R   R   R   R   R   R       Properties       HDT @ 264 psi       ° F.   172.3   170.8   170.7   168.5   168   168.6       Notched Izod, 73° F.       ft-lb/in   1.87   2.18   3.5   4.23   3.43   3.6           std. dev.       0.038   0.198   0.684   0.847   0.292   0.153       Notched Izod, −20° F.       ft-lb/in   1.36   1.5   1.62   1.62   1.61   1.45           std. dev.       0.045   0.113   0.136   0.125   0.127   0.058       Energy to Failure, 73° F.       ft-lb   8.93   10.27   11.62   9.47   7.99   12.42           std. dev.       2.5   3.65   4.56   3.19   2.74   2.61       Total Energy, 73° F.       ft-lb   12.01   14.57   17.68   18.93   12.97   15.45           std. dev.       3.79   4.68   3.81   1.54   0.95   1.49       Energy to Failure, −20° F.       ft-lb   1.92   1.58   2.66   2.71   3.74   3.16           std. dev.       0.45   0.48   0.87   1.87   1.85   2.39       Total Energy, −20° F.       ft-lb   2.18   1.93   2.89   3.41   5   3.82           std. dev.       0.38   0.46   0.72   2.02   1.89   2.13       Flexural Modulus, 73° F.       kpsi   346   347   343   343   344   342           std. dev.   kpsi   4.6   1.5   3.2   0.9   1.6   0.7       Flex Str. @ yield, 73° F.       psi   11020   10930   11110   11040   10970   10920           std. dev.       189   43   20   47   34   60       Flex E. @ break, 73° F.       lb-in   34.66   35.04   35.39   34.91   34.48   34.87           std. dev.       0.46   0.8   0.99   0.84   0.38   0.66       Ten. Str. @ yield, 73° F.       psi   7936   7757   7826   7877   7750   7765           std. dev.       20   34   63   63   31   15       Ten. Str. @ break, 73° F.       psi   6498   6591   6705   6824   6893   6969           std. dev.       169   50   85   106   90   60       T. Elong. @ break, 73° F.       %   28.47   25.92   25   23.64   20.21   17.18           std. dev.       1.93   1.25   2.21   3.86   1.24   1.44               Sample           7   8   9   10   11   12               Energy Input           High   Low   High   Low   High   Low       PPE IV           0.33   0.33   0.4   0.4   0.46   0.46       Pellet Type 1             M   M   M   M   M   M       Properties       HDT @ 264 psi       ° F.   171.3   170.5   171.8   167.2   171.2   170       Notched Izod, 73° F.       ft-lb/in   1.89   2   3.22   4.48   4.04   3.37           std. dev.       0.112   0.098   0.14   0.589   0.438   0.191       Notched Izod, −20° F.       ft-lb/in   1.34   1.4   1.55   1.71   1.52   1.65           std. dev.       0.166   0.038   0.144   0.127   0.128   0.139       Energy to Failure, 73° F.       ft-lb   8.41   11.6   14.07   11.03   10.31   9.38           std. dev.       4.58   2.47   2.82   1.36   3.8   4.17       Total Energy, 73° F.       ft-lb   14.49   12.81   19.77   19.11   15.99   13.7           std. dev.       2.04   3.44   2.79   2.1   0.88   1.22       Energy to Failure, −20° F.       ft-lb   1.78   2.12   2.36   1.77   2.29   2.54           std. dev.       0.56   0.48   0.63   0.33   0.99   0.81       Total Energy, −20° F.       ft-lb   2.02   2.27   2.55   2.14   2.75   4.88           std. dev.       0.56   0.49   0.58   0.41   0.72   1.91       Flexural Modulus, 73° F.       kpsi   347   341   348   344   347   343           std. dev.   kpsi   4.9   4.2   4.7   1.7   2.9   2.2       Flex Str. @ yield, 73° F.       psi   10910   10880   11210   11200   11320   11080           std. dev.       37   107   185   42   147   56       Flex E. @ break, 73° F.       lb-in   34.76   34.95   35.17   35.72   35.4   35.25           std. dev.       0.62   0.45   0.78   0.87   0.41   0.47       Ten. Str. @ yield, 73° F.       psi   7725   7666   7930   7906   7930   7885           std. dev.       42   103   20   15   72   80       Ten. Str. @ break, 73° F.       psi   6432   6343   6809   6674   7032   7175           std. dev.       134   286   134   193   101   92       T. Elong. @ break, 73° F.       %   29.88   29.92   23.86   25.62   19.03   14.85           std. dev.       2.29   4.54   2.49   2.23   2.29   1.46                          
 
         [0054]    [0054]                                                                                                     TABLE 2                       Sample   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21                                Energy Input           High   Low   High   Low   High   Low   High   High   High       PPE IV           0.33   0.33   0.4   0.4   0.46   0.46   0.33   0.4   0.46       Pellet Type 1             G   G   G   G   G   G   P   P   P       Properties       HDT @ 264 psi       ° F.   167.9   169.3   172   171.6   170.8   170   167.8   168.7   172.2       Notched Izod,       ft-lb/in   1.95   2.22   4.29   4.77   4.91   5.02   2   3.81   5.77       73° F.   std. dev.       0.118   0.067   0.812   0.135   0.246   0.282   0.064   0.791   0.236       Notched Izod,       ft-lb/in   1.27   1.45   1.63   1.69   1.72   1.63   1.45   1.72   1.85       −20° F.   std. dev.       0.036   0.079   0.106   0.056   0.06   0.12   0.094   0.148   0.139       Energy to Failure,       ft-lb   15.38   13.72   22.56   21.03   19.71   25.3   20.74   36.1   31.3       73° F.   std. dev.       4.21   3.47   1.95   6.76   6.38   1.86   8.73   2.62   7.8       Total Energy,       ft-lb   17.61   17.17   26.14   25.83   24.54   32.53   24.73   36.4   34.76       73° F.   std. dev.       3.48   1.86   4.87   7.7   5.9   1.48   3.73   2.6   5.65       Energy to Failure,       ft-lb   2.79   3.91   3.24   3   3.46   3.62   4.75   7.99   8.55       −20° F.   std. dev.       0.96   1.38   0.84   1.12   0.94   0.82   1.02   3.68   4.94       Total Energy,       ft-lb   2.95   4.01   3.4   3.15   3.69   4.19   4.83   8.1   8.66       −20° F.   std. dev.       0.87   1.31   0.72   1.03   0.78   0.35   0.95   3.59   4.89       Flexural Modulus,       kpsi   338   343   346   345   348   349   336   332   336       73° F.   std. dev.   kpsi   1.6   1.6   1.3   0.5   1.5   2.1   2.7   1.2   3.1       Flex Str. @ yield,       psi   10670   10950   11200   11110   11290   11350   10780   10820   11150       73° F.   std. dev.       8   12   31   34   27   89   39   9   29       Flex E. @ break,       lb-in   33.58   34.77   35.37   34.89   35.71   35.85   34.05   34.16   35.56       73° F.   std. dev.       0.42   0.17   0.44   0.21   0.46   0.91   0.66   0.58   0.42       Ten. Str. @ yield,       psi   7542   7766   7960   7905   7986   7975   7592   7748   7880       73° F.   std. dev.       9   21   9   15   9   18   35   14   84       T. Str. @ break,       psi   6108   6345   6257   6244   6724   6382   5957   6042   6170       73° F.   std. dev.       125   235   27   76   280   152   114   10   86       T. Elong. @ break,       %   32.69   27.95   32.43   29.31   24.65   31.15   32.69   31.94   37.7       73° F.   std. dev.       1.97   4.15   2.61   1.24   3.07   3.98   2.57   1.17   9.09                            
         [0055]    The compositions in Tables 1 and 2 compare the same composition wherein the form of the PPE has been varied. Samples 19 to 21 illustrate controls varying the I.V. of the PPE but using the PPE in the powder form as commercially isolated and available. The physical properties obtained with these compositions illustrate the target values that would be desired if the PPE were utilized in an alternate form to that of isolated powder in the same or a new process. Samples 1 to 6 illustrate the physical properties obtained for the same composition varying the I.V. of the PPE but wherein the PPE is in a pellet form having an average size of about 3 mm by about 3 mm. Comparing the properties of samples 1 and 2 to control sample 19 of the same I.V. PPE; or samples 3 and 4 to control sample 20; or samples 5 and 6 to control sample 21 demonstrates the substantially poorer impact strength, especially Dynatup dart impact strength obtained when pellets having an average size of about 3 mm by about 3 mm are utilized. Likewise, the properties of samples 7 and 8 to control sample 19 of the same I.V. PPE; or samples 9 and 10 to control sample 20; or samples 11 and 12 to control sample 21 demonstrates the substantially poorer impact strength, especially Dynatup dart impact strength obtained when mini-pellets having an average size of about 3 mm by about 3 mm are utilized.  
         [0056]    In contrast to the results using pellets or mini-pellets, the properties of samples 13 and 14 to control sample 19 of the same I.V. PPE; or samples 15 and 16 to control sample 20; or samples 17 and 18 to control sample 21 demonstrates the substantially better physical properties could be obtained using ground material. It was unexpected that the physical properties, especially the Dynatup dart impact strength, would be affected by the PPE particle size. It is thought that using a smaller PPE particle than the standard 3 mm by 3 mm pellet, and/or the irregular shape of the ground particles, affords less shear heating during the compounding operation with less thermal and shear degradation of the materials.  
                                                                                             TABLE 3                       Sample   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29                                PPE/HIPS ratio           90:10   90:10   —   —   70:30   70:30   —   —       PPE/RDP ratio           —   —   90:10   90:10   —   —   70:30   70:30       Energy Input           High   High   High   High   High   High   High   High       PPE IV           0.40   0.46   0.40   0.46   0.40   0.46   0.40   0.46       Pellet Type 1             G   G   G   G   G   G   P   P       Properties       HDT @ 264 psi       ° F.   173   177   172.6   201.7   177.7   179.1   174.2   173.2       Notched Izod, 73° F.       ft-lb/in   3.0   3.1   4.31   5.29   3.83   4.01   5.74   6.61           std. dev.       0.195   0.31   0.86   0.22   0.302   0.292   0.373   0.2       Notched Izod, −20° F.       ft-lb/in   1.9   1.9   2.48   3.0   1.93   2.16   2.53   2.9           std. dev.       0.384   0.384   0.23   0.189   0.235   0.414   0.278   0.417       Energy to Failure, 73° F.       ft-lb   6.97   12.32   8.44   9.84   11.52   12.72   21.58   26.85           std. dev.       1.87   1.82   3.36   6.4   4.84   6.67   4.84   5.06       Total Energy, 73° F.       ft-lb   15.94   13.0   15.52   19.53   18.14   19.41   26.88   29.86           std. dev.       0.74   1.6   0.77   4.36   2.39   3.37   5.23   3.33       Energy to Failure, −20° F.       ft-lb   1.59   2.87   2.75   4.69   2.51   4.7   3.88   3.07           std. dev.       0.26   0.69   1.34   4.62   0.72   4.06   1.3   0.36       Total Energy, −20° F.       ft-lb   1.63   3.14   4.98   7.34   2.68   5.81   3.93   5.32           std. dev.       0.26   0.46   2.59   3.44   0.83   4.02   1.3   2.25       Flexural Modulus, 73° F.       kpsi   347   344   363.7   368.7   344.3   348.9   343.3   344.7           std. dev.   kpsi   2.574   4.7   3.8   3.6   2307   180   2   1.6       Flex Str. @ yield, 73° F.       psi   11500   11350   11290   12340   11320   11610   11400   11450           std. dev.       28   104   260   130   63   28   84   30       Flex E. @ break, 73° F.       lb-in   —   —   37.75   40.05   —   —   37.64   37.77           std. dev.               0.6   0.15   —   —   0.35   0.25       Ten. Str. @ yield, 73° F.       psi   7720   7681   7512   8023   7533   7671   7763   7682           std. dev.       16   10   90   54   23   15   13   51       T. Str. @ break, 73° F.       psi   6429   6735   6287   6843   6005   6231   6085   5977           std. dev.       156   58   106   491   43   222   96   71       T. Elong. @ break, 73° F.       %   22.67   19.16   30.36   25.53   30.32   29.79   25.59   25.54           std. dev.       1   1.33   2.03   3.59   1.27   2.65   2.5   1.41                          
 
         [0057]    The data in Table 3 compares concentrate compositions containing PPE with either HIPS or RDP. As can be seen from these data, especially comparing samples 26 and 27 to 28 and 29 with a 30% by weight loading of the HIPS or RDP, respectively, high value concentrates can be made from PPE with phosphate materials. It was unexpected that concentrates containing so high a loading of phosphate would result in such acceptable physical properties. It was especially unexpected that the dart impact strength values would be so high. The results are also unexpected considering that the PPE/ phosphate concentrates of samples 28 and 29 were used as pellets and not as ground material.  
         [0058]    It should also be clear that the present invention affords a method to prepare PPE compositions while reducing the dust explosion tendency of PPE powder.  
         [0059]    The preceding examples are set forth to illustrate specific embodiments of the invention and are not intended to limit its scope. It should be clear that the present invention includes articles from the compositions as described herein. Additional embodiments and advantages within the scope of the claimed invention will be apparent to one or ordinary skill in the art.