Abstract:
A method for removing nitrogen oxides from exhaust gases containing oxygen and moisture, which comprises bringing the exhaust gas into contact with hydrogenated zeolite catalysts or hydrogenated zeolite catalysts impregnated with one or more kinds of metals selected from the group consisting of copper, zinc, vanadium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, rhodium, palladium, platinum, and molybdenum, in the presence of organic compounds. The zeolite should be a zeolite having a silica/alumina ratio of 5 or above. The zeolite may be any one of zeolite of Y type, zeolite of L type, zeolite of offretite-erionite mixed crystal type, zeolite of ferrierite type, zeolite of mordenite type, zeolite of clinoptilolite type, and zeolite of ZSM-5 type.

Description:
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/504,156 filed Apr. 3, 1990, now abandoned. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     The present invention relates to a method of treating exhaust gases, especially those discharged from diesel engines, gasoline engines or gas turbines which contain excess oxygen and moisture as well as nitrogen oxides (abbreviated as NO x  hereinafter). The method comprises bringing the exhaust gas into contact with a zeolite catalyst in the presence of organic compounds, thereby converting NO x  in the exhaust gas into harmless nitrogen gas. 
     2. Description of the Prior Art 
     There are several practical methods for removing NO x  from exhaust gases. For example, the selective reduction method is applied to exhaust gases from boilers which employs the V 2  O 5  -TiO 2  catalyst and ammonia gas as the reducing agent. The method applied to exhaust gases from gasoline engines consists of controlling the air-fuel ratio (hence the oxygen concentration) and removing NO x , carbon monoxide, and hydrocarbons all at once by the use of the ternary catalyst. (See Funahiki and Yamada, &#34;Catalysts for Automotive Exhaust Gas&#34;, Preprints of the Meeting for Theoretical Fundamental Study of Practical Catalysts, Catalysis Society of Japan, p. 15-20, 1989.) The former method has an advantage of being effective for removing NO x  from exhaust gases containing excess oxygen, but it has also a disadvantage of requiring ammonia gas as the reducing agent. Therefore, it is useful for special applications but not for general uses. Especially, it can hardly be applied to vehicles carrying a diesel engine of compression ignition type and to small- or medium-sized stationary boilers. The latter method using the ternary catalyst is not effective for exhaust gases containing excess oxygen and hence it is not of practical use for exhaust gases from diesel engines. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for removing NO x  effectively which can be applied to exhaust gases containing excess oxygen without the need of using ammonia. 
     This object is fulfilled by using as the catalyst hydrogenized zeolites as such or hydrogenated zeolite catalysts impregnated with one or more kinds of metals selected from the group consisting of copper, zinc, vanadium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, rhodium, palladium, platinum, and molybdenum, in the presence of organic compounds. Thus, according to the present invention, it is possible to selectively remove nitrogen oxides from exhaust gases containing excess oxygen. 
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     According to the present invention, hydrogenated zeolites are used as a catalyst or catalyst support. The hydrogenation of the zeolite is carried out either by a direct method or an indirect method. The former method involves the steps of washing the zeolite with mineral acids repeatedly and exchanging cations in the zeolite with hydrogen ions. The latter method involves the steps of washing the zeolite with ammonium ion-containing water repeatedly, replacing cations in the zeolite with ammonium ions, and calcining the zeolite thereby volatilizing ammonia. Both methods can be used for the present invention. 
     One of the most important features of the present invention is to use hydrogenated zeolites. Zeolite without hydrogenation removes NO x  very little as demonstrated in Example 1 and Comparative Example 1 which follow. There are no restrictions as to the species of the zeolites to be used in the present invention; it may be either a synthetic one or a naturally occurring one, so long as it is hydrogenated. 
     It is well known that the acid resistance of a zeolite depends on the silica/alumina ratio which indicates the chemical composition of the zeolite, and that the smaller the silica/alumina ratio, the lower the acid resistance. It is also known that hydrogenated zeolites are hydrophobic and have the properties of solid acids, the strength of which depend also on the silica/alumina ratio. (See Course of Catalysts, vol. 10, compiled by the Catalysis Society of Japan, published by Kodansha, 1986.) These facts may suggest that the activity of catalysts supported on zeolites will greatly vary depending on the silica/alumina ratio. The present inventors found from many experiments on a variety of zeolites that desired catalysts in the present invention are obtained by hydrogenating zeolites having a silica/alumina ratio higher than about 5, as demonstrated in Examples 1 and 2 that follow. In addition, more active catalysts are obtained by hydrogenating zeolites having a silica/alumina ratio higher than about 10, as demonstrated in the same examples. 
     According to the present invention, the hydrogenated zeolite catalyst can be prepared by hydrogenating a synthetic zeolite (such as zeolite of Y type, zeolite of L type, zeolite of offretite-erionite mixed crystal type, zeolite of ferrierite type, zeolite of mordenite type, and zeolite of ZSM-5 type) or a natural zeolite (such as zeolite of mordenite type and zeolite of clinoptilolite type), as shown in the following Examples. They are exemplary but not limitative. 
     According to the present invention, the catalyst is used in the presence of organic compounds as a reducing agent. The organic compounds include hydrocarbons such as methane, ethane, propane, butane and fuel oil as well as alcohols, ketones, and ethers. In other words, the method of the present invention permits a much wider selection of reducing agent than the conventional selective reduction method which resorts to ammonia as the reducing agent. 
     The impregnation of metallic elements in the zeolite may be accomplished by stirring the hydrogenated zeolite (prepared as mentioned above) in an aqueous solution of salts of desired metallic elements followed by separating from the solution, drying and calcining the treated zeolite (This method will be referred to as the first impregnation method.) Alternatively, the impregnation may be accomplished by contacting the zeolite with an aqueous solution of salts of desired metallic elements and then with water containing ammonium ions and finally heating the treated zeolite for volatilizing ammonia. (This method will be referred to as the second impregnation method.) The second method may be performed by reversing the order of contacting. (This method will be referred to as the third impregnation method.) 
     In Examples explained later, experiments were carried out using synthetic zeolites of TSM series produced by Toso Co., Ltd., which include zeolites of Y type, L type, offretite-erionite mixed crystal type, ferrierite type, mordenite type, and ZSM-5 type. These zeolites were hydrogenated by dipping in 4N hydrochloric acid at 100° C. for 4 hours and then thoroughly rinsing and drying. Experiments were also carried out using natural zeolites, which include mordenite-containing tuff (from Akita Prefecture) and clinoptilolite-containing tuff (from Fukushima Prefecture). The natural zeolites were hydrogenated by washing repeatedly with heated hydrochloric acid (2 mol/L) for 40 hours. 
     The catalytic activity of the hydrogenated zeolites, with or without metallic elements supported thereon, were tested in the following manner. The powder of the hydrogenated zeolite was molded under pressure, then crashed and sieved to collect particles with diameters between 10-20 mesh. The sample (5 cm 3 ) was filled in a stainless steel reactor tube 10 mm in inside diameter. Through this reactor tube was passed a simulated exhaust gas composed of 0.15 vol% NO, 10 vol% oxygen, and 7.3 vol% moisture, with the balance being argon. As an organic compound as the reducing agent, propane was added into this exhaust gas in an amount equivalent to 4-5 times the concentration of NO x  (in molar ratio). The concentrations of NO x  in gases were measured by the chemiluminescence method. The percentage of NO x  removed was calculated according to the formula below: ##EQU1## where, A=concentration of NO x  in the gas discharged from the catalyst layer 
     B=concentration of NO x  in the gas entering the catalyst layer 
    
    
     The invention will be more clearly understood with reference to the following Examples and Comparative Examples. 
     EXAMPLE 1 
     Removal of NO x  by hydrogenated zeolite catalysts 
     Experiments on the removal of NO x  by a variety of hydrogenated zeolite catalysts were carried out. The results are shown in Table 1. In these experiments, the temperature of the reactor was kept at 400° C. and the flow rate of the simulated exhaust gas was 210 mL per minute (equivalent to the space velocity of 2500 hr -1 ). It is noted from Table 1 that the percentages of NO x  removed are zero in the cases of zeolites having silica/alumina ratios lower than 10 and that the percentages of NO x  removed are higher than 30% in the cases of zeolites having silica/alumina ratios higher than 12. The results indicate that the hydrogenated zeolites themselves can remove NO x  from the exhaust gas containing excess oxygen so long as the zeolites have silica/alumina ratios higher than about 10 and the exhaust gas is incorporated with an organic compound as the reducing agent. 
     
                       TABLE 1______________________________________       Silica/alumina                   Percentage ofType of zeolite       ratio       NO.sub.x removed (%)______________________________________Y type      5.9         0L type      6.2         0Offretite-erionite       7.4         0mixed crystal typeMordenite type       10.2        1Ferrierite type       12.2        34.0Mordenite type       14.9        35.0Ferrierite type       20.5        41.0ZSM-5 type  40.0        40.0______________________________________ 
    
     EXAMPLE 2 
     Removal of NO x  by metal-impregnated hydrogenated zeolite catalysts 
     Experiments were carried out in the same manner as in Example 1 using a variety of catalysts impregnated with one or more metals selected from among nickel, copper, manganese, chromium, cobalt, zinc, iron, and vanadium. The results are shown in Table 2. It is noted from Table 2 that hydrogenated zeolites become more active when they are impregnated with metallic elements. The percentage of NO x  removed is higher than 20% even when the silica/alumina ratio is lower than 10 (except in the case of zinc catalyst). And the percentage of NO x  removed is higher than 60% if the silica/alumina ratio is higher than 10 (except in the case of zinc catalyst). Thus the percentage of NO x  removed is greatly increased when hydrogenated-zeolites are impregnated with metallic elements. 
     
                       TABLE 2______________________________________Metallic         Silica/  Percentage                               Conversionelement Kind of  alumina  of NO.sub.x                               into nitrogensupported   carrier* ratio    removed (%)                               gas (%)______________________________________Copper  A        5.9      100       100   B        12.2     100        99   C        14.9     100       100   D        40.0     100       100Vanadium   A        5.9      33.6      100   B        12.2     86.8      100   C        14.9     84.5       99   D        40.0     86.2       99Chromium   A        5.9      29.7       97   B        12.2     46.7       99   C        14.9     42.7       99   D        40.0     49.3      100Manganese   A        5.9      81.1      100   B        12.2     97.9      100   C        14.9     89.2       99   D        40.0     99.1      100Cobalt  A        5.9      20.7       98   B        12.2     77.3      100   C        14.9     88.4       97   D        40.0     89.8       99Nickel  A        5.9      66.2      100   B        12.2     99.8      100   C        14.9     87.8      100   D        40.0     99.9      100Zinc    A        5.9      13.7       97   B        12.2     23.5       96   C        14.9     22.3       95   D        40.0     23.0       98Iron    A        5.9      25.4       92   B        12.2     66.5      100   C        14.9     65.7      100   D        40.0     68.3       97______________________________________ *A: Y type, B: ferrierite type, C: mordenite type, D: ZSM5 type 
    
     EXAMPLE 3 
     Effect of space velocity on the removal of NO x  by metal-impregnated zeolite catalysts 
     Similar experiments to those in Example 2 were carried out using copper catalysts or copper-nickel catalysts to examine the effect of space velocity on the removal of NO x . No water vapor was added to the simulated exhaust gas in these experiments. The results are shown in Table 3. It is noted that catalysts on zeolites having a silica/alumina ratio lower than 10 achieve the percentage of NO x  removed higher than 50% even when the space velocity is increased eight-fold (up to 20,000 hr -1 ). In the case of catalysts on zeolites having silica/alumina ratios higher than 10, the percentage of NO x  removed is higher than 90% at the same space velocity 
     
                       TABLE 3______________________________________   Zeolite             Percentage                               ConversionMetallic   (silica/  Space     of NO.sub.x                               intoelement alumina   velocity  removed nitrogensupported   ratio)    (hr.sup.-1)                       (%)     gas (%)______________________________________Copper  Type Y     5000     100     100    (5.9)    10000     96.2    100             15000     64.5     99             20000     51.6     98   Ferrierite              5000     100     100   type      10000     100     100   (12.2)    15000     100     100             20000     96.4     99   Mordenite  5000     100     100   type      10000     100     100   (14.9)    15000     98.6     97             20000     87.3     98   ZSM-5      5000     100     100   type      10000     100     100   (40.0)    15000     100      98             20000     97.6     99Copper- Type Y     5000     100      96nickel   (5.9)    10000     100     100             15000     92.5    100             20000     63.2     98   Ferrierite              5000     100     100   type      10000     100      97   (12.2)    15000     100      99             20000     93.2    100   Mordenite  5000     100     100   type      10000     100      96   (14.9)    15000     100     100             20000     98.8     99   ZSM-5      5000     100     100   type      10000     100     100   (40.0)    15000     100     95             20000     99.1    97______________________________________ 
    
     EXAMPLE 4 
     Identification of reaction products 
     The exhaust gas treated by the present catalysts may contain nitrous oxide (N 2  O) and nitric acid as well as nitrogen gas. To identify these compounds, the treated exhaust gas was analyzed. Since the simulated exhaust gas does not contain nitrogen gas, it is possible to calculate the conversion of NO x  into nitrogen from the amount of nitrogen produced. The determination of nitrogen and nitrous oxide was carried out by gas chromatography. The determination of nitric acid was carried out by alkali titration of the condensate recovered from the treated gas by cooling by ice. It was found that the amounts of nitrous oxide and nitric acid were smaller than the limit of detection. 
     In Tables 2 and 3, the conversion of NO x  into nitrogen gas is expressed in percentage calculated under the assumption that 2 mol of NO x  removed gives rise to 1 mol of nitrogen gas. It is noted that the metal-impregnated catalysts of the present invention convert NO x  into nitrogen gas almost completely. 
     EXAMPLE 5 
     Denitration by natural mordenite 
     Experiments of denitration were carried out using metal-impregnated catalysts prepared from natural mordenite (from Akita Prefecture) treated by the direct hydrogenation. The metal impregnation was accomplished by the above-mentioned first method. The direct hydrogenation was accomplished by washing natural mordenite repeatedly with 2N hydrochloric acid at 100° C. for 40 hours. The metals impregnated on the catalysts were prepared mostly from nitrates (except palladium chloride, rhodium chloride, chloroplatinic acid, ammonium metavanadate, and ammonium molybdate). For metal impregnation, the catalyst was dipped in the aqueous solution (1 mol/L) of a volume three times as much as that of the catalyst, at 90° C. for 2 hours. 
     The conditions of experiments were as follows The catalyst bed was prepared by filling a column, 2 cm in inside diameter and 16 cm high, with catalyst particles, 10-20 mesh in size. The simulated exhaust gas was passed at a flow rate of 1 liter per minute. The simulated exhaust gas was composed of N 2  (80 vol%), O 2  (10 vol%), CO 2  (10 vol%), NO (0.17 vol%), and moisture produced by injecting 4 g of water per hour into the gas. The gas was preheated to the reaction temperature and incorporated with an organic compound as the reducing agent. 
     The results are shown in Table 4. Propane used as the reducing agent is a fuel-grade commercial product composed of 92% of propane, 8% of ethane, and 0.1% of isobutane. Gas oil is a commercial product for diesel cars. Other organic compounds are commercial reagents. 
     
                                           TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________   Reaction         Name of               Amount                     Ratio ofElement tempera-         reducing               added Denitra-supported   ture (°C.)         agent (mg/min)                     tion (%)                          Remarks__________________________________________________________________________None    430   None  0      8None    430   Propane               3.8   55None    430   Gas oil               4.3   47None    350   Gas oil               4.3   45None    430   Gas oil               4.3   47None    500   Gas oil               4.3   41None    430   Ethanol               6.0   57None    430   Ethylene               4.0   50None    430   Acetone               5.0   47None    430   n-C.sub.10 H.sub.22               7.0   55None    430   Ether 5.0   47None    430   Isobuthane               4.0   50Copper  400   None  0      8Copper  500   None  0      6Copper  600   None  0      3Copper  400   Propane               3.8   34Copper  500   Propane               3.8   36Copper  500   Propane               3.8   36   O.sub.2 = 5%Copper  600   Propane               3.8   38Copper  600   Propane               8.0   61Copper  600   Propane               11.4  74Copper  500   Ethanol               6.0   40Copper  500   n-C.sub.10 H.sub.22               7.0   50Copper  500   Ether 5.0   45Copper  500   Acetone               5.0   48Chromium   430   None  0     15Chromium   430   Propane               3.8   52Nickel  430   None  0     63Nickel  430   Propane               3.8   83Nickel  430   Gas oil               4.3   50Nickel  430   n-C.sub.10 H.sub.22               5.0   75Nickel  430   Ethanol               5.0   60Iron    430   None  0      7Iron    430   Propane               3.8   62Cobalt  430   None  0     27Cobalt  430   Propane               3.8   68Cobalt  430   Gas oil               4.3   50Cobalt  430   Ethanol               5.0   70Palladium   400   None  0     18Palladium   500   None  0     18Palladium   430   None  0     10Palladium   430   Propane               3.8   55Palladium   430   Propane               3.8   67Manganese   430   None  0     10Manganese   430   Propane               3.8   75Manganese   430   Propane               3.8   78Manganese   430   Gas oil               4.3   50Manganese   430   n-C.sub.6 H.sub.14               6.0   65Manganese   430   n-C.sub.10 H.sub.22               7.0   60Manganese   430   Ethanol               6.0   58Manganese   430   Ethylene               4.0   70Manganese   430   Acetone               5.0   65   O.sub.2 = 5%Manganese   430   n-Butane               4.0   70Manganese   430   Isobutane               4.0   70Molybdenum   430   None  0     10Molybdenum   430   Propane               3.8   51Molybdenum   430   Gas oil               4.3   45Rhodium 430   None  0     15Rhodium 430   Propane               3.8   51Rhodium 430   Gas oil               4.3   40Platinum   430   None  0     10Platinum   430   Propane               3.8   55Platinum   430   Gas oil               4.3   46V--Mn binary   300   None  0     15V--Mn binary   400   None  0     11V--Mn binary   300   Propane               3.8   27V--Mn binary   400   Propane               3.8   89V--Mn binary   400   Propane               7.3   95V--Mn binary   500   Propane               3.8   85V--Mn binary   400   Gas oil               4.3   60Cr--Mn binary   430   Propane               3.8   44V--Ni binary   430   None  0      9V--Ni binary   430   Propane               3.8   62Cr--Ni binary   430   None  0     16Cr--Ni binary   430   Propane               3.8   46Cr--Ni binary   430   Gas oil               4.3   33Cr--Cu binary   300   None  0      0Cr--Cu binary   400   None  0     16Cr--Cu binary   250   Propane               3.8    4Cr--Cu binary   300   Propane               3.8   10Cr--Cu binary   430   Propane               3.8   27Cr--Cu binary   300   Gas oil               4.3   27Cr--Cu binary   320   Gas oil               4.3   36Cr--Cu binary   430   Gas oil               4.3   27Cr--V binary   300   None  0      7Cr--V binary   330   None  0      8Cr--V binary   360   None  0     25Cr--V binary   300   Propane               3.8   36Cr--V binary   330   Propane               3.8   61Cr--V binary   360   Propane               3.8   63Cr--V binary   300   Gas oil               4.3   27Cr--V binary   360   Gas oil               4.3   22Cr--Fe binary   300   None  0      7Cr--Fe binary   330   None  0     14Cr--Fe binary   360   None  0      6Cr--Fe binary   380   None  0      6Cr--Fe binary   430   None  0      4Cr--Fe binary   300   Propane               3.8   58Cr--Fe binary   330   Propane               3.8   78Cr--Fe binary   380   Propane               3.8   58Cr--Fe binary   430   Propane               3.8   46Cr--Fe binary   300   Gas oil               4.3   52Cr--Fe binary   330   Gas oil               4.3   55Cr--Fe binary   380   Gas oil               4.3   33Cr--Fe binary   430   n-C.sub.10 H.sub.22               5.0   78__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
     EXAMPLE 6 
     Denitration by natural clinoptilolite 
     Similar experiments as in Example 5 were carried out except that the catalysts were prepared from clinoptilolite (from Fukushima Prefecture). Results are shown in Table 5. 
     
                                           TABLE 5__________________________________________________________________________   Reaction         Name of               Amount                     Ratio ofElement tempera-         reducing               added Denitra-supported   ture (°C.)         agent (mg/min)                     tion (%)                          Remarks__________________________________________________________________________None    430   Propane               3.8   40None    430   Gas oil               4.3   40None    430   n-C.sub.10 H.sub.22               7.0   50None    430   Ethanol               6.0   54None    430   Ether 5.0   43None    430   Isobutance               4.0   40Iron    430   None  0     10Iron    430   Propane               3.8   40Iron    430   Gas oil               4.3   30Chromium   430   None  0     10Chromium   430   Propane               3.8   44Chromium   350   Gas oil               4.3   43Chromium   430   Gas oil               4.3   50Chromium   520   Gas oil               4.3   40Manganese   430   None  0      8Manganese   430   Propane               3.8   67Manganese   430   Ethanol               6.0   60Manganese   430   Gas oil               4.3   45Manganese   430   n-C.sub.10 H.sub.22               7.0   50Nickel  430   None  0     51Nickel  430   Propane               3.8   70Nickel  430   Gas oil               4.3   45Cr--Fe binary   430   None  0     10Cr--Fe binary   330   Propane               3.8   65Cr--Fe binary   430   Propane               3.8   40Cr--Fe binary   330   Gas oil               4.3   47Cr--Fe binary   380   Gas oil               4.3   40__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
     EXAMPLE 7 
     Denitration by catalysts hydrogenated by the indirect method 
     In this example the same raw material and impregnation method as in Example 5 were used except that the hydrogenation was carried out by the indirect method in the following manner. Natural mordenite rocks were crushed, and the resulting powder was dipped in an aqueous solution of ammonium chloride (2 mol/L) at 90° C. for 2 hours. The powder was then heated to 600° C. to volatilize ammonia. The results are shown in Table 6. 
     EXAMPLE 8 
     Effect of the second impregnation method 
     The catalyst was prepared from the natural mordenite as in Example 5. The zeolite was caused to support a desired metallic element and then hydrogenated by the ammonium ion exchange according to the above-mentioned second impregnation method. The results are shown in Table 6. 
     EXAMPLE 9 
     Effect of the third impregnation method 
     The catalyst was prepared from the same zeolite as in Example 5. The zeolite was caused to support a desired metallic element according to the above-mentioned third impregnation method. The results are shown in Table 6. 
     
                       TABLE 6______________________________________            Reaction Name of                            Amount Ratio ofExample  Element   tempera- reducing                            added  Denitra-No.    supported ture (°C.)                     agent  (mg/min)                                   tion (%)______________________________________7      None      430      None   0       07      None      430      Propane                            3.8    597      None      430      Gas oil                            4.3    327      Manganese 430      None   0       37      Manganese 430      Propane                            3.8    697      Manganese 430      Gas oil                            4.3    557      Iron      430      Propane                            3.8    407      Copper    430      Propane                            3.8    358      Manganese 430      None   0      108      Manganese 430      Propane                            3.8    678      Manganese 430      Gas oil                            4.3    359      Manganese 430      Propane                            3.8    869      Nickel    430      None   0       59      Nickel    430      Propane                            3.8    59______________________________________ 
    
     COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1 
     Removal of NO x  by unhydrogenated zeolites 
     Experiments were carried out under the same conditions as in Example 1 except that the zeolite was not hydrogenated. The results are shown in Table 7. It is noted that only very little NO x  was removed. 
     COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2 
     Removal of NO x  by hydrogenated zeolite catalysts in the absence of organic compounds 
     Experiments were carried out under the same conditions as in Example 1 except that the organic compound as the reducing agent was not added. The results are shown in Table 7. It is noted that only very little NO x  was removed. 
     COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 3 
     Removal of NO x  by metal-impregnated hydrogenated zeolite catalysts in the absence of organic compounds 
     Experiments were carried out using metal-impregnated catalysts under the same conditions as in Example 2 except that no organic compound as the reducing agent was added. The results are shown in Table 7. It is noted that the percentage of NO x  removed was less than 10%. 
     
                       TABLE 7______________________________________Silica/    Removal of NO.sub.x (%) alumina  Comparative                     Comparative                               ComparativeZeolite ratio    Example 1  Example 2 Example 3______________________________________A      5.9     0          0         3B     12.2     1          7         0C     14.9     0          0         4D     40.0     2          5         9______________________________________ 
    
     Designation of zeolite: 
     A: Zeolite of Y type 
     B: Zeolite of ferrierite type 
     C: Zeolite of mordenite type 
     D: Zeolite of ZSM-5 type