Abstract:
For accurate position calculation of scintillation events in a gamma camera, photodetector signals are processed based on small groups of photodetectors surrounding the scintillations. Relative position correction and energy correction is carried out based on rough position values relative to the group of photodetectors, taking into consideration the number of the center photodetector and the sum of all photodetector signals in the group.

Description:
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/097,674, filed Jul. 27, 1993. 
    
    
     FIELD OF INVENTION 
     The present invention relates to energy-independent position calculation, position correction, and energy calculation and energy correction for scintillation events in the digital scintillation camera. 
     BACKGROUND OF INVENTION 
     Scintillation cameras are well known in the art, and are used for medical diagnostics. A patient is injected, or ingests or inhales a small quantity of a radioactive isotope. Whose emission photons are detected by a scintillation medium in the camera. The scintillation is commonly a sodium iodide crystal, BGO or other, which emits a small flash or scintillation of light, in response to stimulating radiation. The intensity of the scintillation is proportional, (but not linearly) to the energy of the stimulating gamma photon. 
     As known in the prior art, the depth of interaction of the scintillation in the crystal is proportional to the energy of the gamma photons. As a prior art this fact prevents Anger based gamma cameras from having linear positional response for different energies. In order to produce a diagnostic medical image, scintillations having an energy which corresponds to the energy of the decay gamma photons of the radioactive isotope are detected and the intensity each scintillation in the crystal (or crystals for multicrystal cameras) is measured. 
     Then, the position of the scintillation calculated, and the calculated position is corrected for the scintillation. Similarly the energy is calculated and corrected. All the calculations are based on the energy intensity values of at least three light detectors (n-tuple) coupled to the surface of the scintillation medium and surrounding the point of scintillation. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     It is an object of the present invention to improve scintillation camera image quality by providing a method of energy independent position calculation and corrections. 
     It is another object of the present to improve scintillation camera image quality by providing the method of energy calculation and corrections. 
     It is yet another object of the present to improve uniformity of the image which consists of the multiplicity of the small images which are tiled, to form the image of the scintillation camera. 
     According to one aspect of the invention, in the method of using at least three light detectors (n-tuple), an image from the scintillation camera is composed (tiled) from many small images each of which corresponds to the area of calculation of at least three light detectors (n-tuple), but preferably seven, twelve, thirteen, or nineteen light detectors. Energy calculation and correction are also done over the area of calculation of at least three light detectors (but preferably seven, twelve, thirteen, or nineteen light detectors, n-tuple). 
     This method can also be used to improve the position and energy correction for Anger based scintillation cameras. 
     According to a further aspect of the invention, there is provided the final image consisting of the multiplicity of the small images which are tiled in geometrical order to create the image of the area over the whole scintillation detector. In order to improve the uniformity of the final image, a new method is proposed. The proposed method consists of the random selection of the light detectors in the calculation if the event is located near the edge of the light detector. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     The invention will be better understood by following the non-limiting detailed description of the preferred embodiment with reference to the drawings in which: 
     FIG. 1 is a block schematic diagram of the scintillation camera according to the preferred embodiment. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT 
     With the reference to FIG. 1 the scintillation camera system comprises the digital camera 40, energy calculation 42, position calculation 44, energy correction circuit 46, relative position correction circuit 48, absolute position calculation circuit 50. 
     In its preferred embodiment, the energy calculation and correction method is digital and independent of the linearity correction, which means that it can be performed, before, or in parallel with the linearity correction. If it is performed after linearity correction then it becomes position dependent. If the energy correction is performed before the linearity correction, events which are outside the required energy window can be filtered earlier in the process. 
     In the preferred embodiment it is assumed that a tuning device exists, as described in commonly assigned application entitled &#34;Photodetector Calibration in a Scintillation Camera Using a Single Light Source&#34; Ser. No. 08/354,546 filed Dec. 14, 1994 or as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,237,173 but not limited to such devices, and that the tuning is done before the acquisition for the energy information and positional information. The assumption is that before each acquisition, tuning is performed on the detector head, which will normalize the responses of all the light detectors. The assumption is that the detector head is digital, but not limited to being digital. (This energy correction method can be used with any detector head on the market, which can improve the characteristics of the detector heads). 
     Outputs from the digital detector head as seen in FIG. 1, are the following: 
     1) The label or sequential number associated with the light detector in the detector head T, with the highest response, or in the close neighborhood of the detector with the highest response. The light detector with the highest response or in close neighborhood will be called the center light detector. The assumption is that the absolute coordinates of each light detector is known in the detector head. 
     2) The response signal of the central light detector of an n-tuple, defining the n-tuple as a group of the light detectors in the neighborhood of the center light detector. 
     3) The responses of all light detectors in the neighboring n-tuple of the central light detector, defining the n-tuple as a group of the light detectors in the neighborhood of the center light detector. 
     Energy calculation circuit 42, produces a sum signal of said n-tuple of light detector signals including the signal of the central light detector. 
     Position calculation circuit 44, produces x and y values for the particular n-tuple of the light detectors. Center of gravity calculation can be used. Output from the position calculation is the associated label or sequential number T of the center light detector in the n-tuple. 
     Energy calculation and position calculation are done prior to the energy correction. Energy calculation and position calculation can be done in parallel, or the energy calculation can be part of the information that is used in positional calculation, e.g. center of gravity calculations. 
     The energy correction method consists of three well defined phases: first, acquisition of the energy information; second producing the energy correction tables; third, applying the energy correction 46 in real time acquisitions. 
     Acquisition of energy information: For each of many n-tuples with corresponding central light detector in the preferred embodiment, N by M histograms are recorded which cover the area of calculation of one n-tuple. Each histogram consist of at least 256 bins. Mistograms are addressed by the highest n bits of the x position and the highest m bits of the y position. For each event with particular position x and y, particular histogram is chosen depending on position, and the counter of that histogram is increased, depending on the energy. The number of counts in each histogram has to be statistically sufficient. Acquisition is done with the known energy, and without any structured phantoms or collimators. 
     For producing the energy tables; in the preferred embodiment, histograms should be filtered with a 3D filter for each n-tuple to smooth the response. It is known in the prior art that the response of the light detectors is higher in the center, and is decreases towards the periphery of the light detector, and that the response is continuous. Responses of the n-tuples are also smooth. For each n-tuple, the maximum response of each of the histograms is computed after filtering. For each histogram the factor should be computed so that the responses of all the light detectors are equal. For each n-tuple, a table of N by M factors is stored in the energy table. 
     When applying the energy correction 46 in real time; for each event, and depending on the central light detector of the n-tuple, address or label, and also depending on the first m bits of x coordinate and n bits of y coordinate, a particular address in the table is addressed. The computed energy, which is the sum of all the signals in the n-tuple of light detectors including the central light detector, is multiplied by the factor in the table. This produces the energy corrected value for that event. 
     In the preferred embodiment, the position correction method consists of four well defined phases. First, acquisition of the position information; second, producing the position correction tables for each n-tuple and third applying the relative position correction 48 in real time acquisitions. The fourth phase consists of adding the relative position of the n-tuple to the known geometric position of that n-tuple in the scintillation detector to create the absolute position 50. Assumption is that the detector head is capable of providing: 
     1) Associated label of the light detector in the detector head, with the highest response, or in the close neighborhood. We will call the light detector with the highest response in one event the center light detector. 
     2) Assumption is that the absolute coordinate of each light detector is known in the detector head. 
     3) Responses of all the light detectors in the neighboring n-tuple, defining the n-tuple as a group of the light detectors, in the vicinity of the center light detector. 
     4) In preferred embodiment n-tuple is consisting of seven, twelve, thirteen, or nineteen light detectors. 
     5) Definition of the event: Event is one incidence of the gamma photon producing the scintillation effect in the crystal of the detector head. Detector head outputs the label T of the center light detector, and the values of the center light detector and the intensity values of the light detectors in the neighboring n-tuple. 
     6) For positional calculation many methods can be used, such as center of gravity, but not limited to (for calculation of x and y coordinates). Positional calculation is the method of reducing the amount of data. At the input of the positional calculation device are the values of intensity values of all light detector of the n-tuple, and the output is the relative x and y coordinates, which are not necessary linear. 
     In the acquisition of position information; acquisition consists of two parts. First, acquisition with the structured phantom in front of the scintillation camera (Smith phantom), and second, acquisition without phantom, the so-called flood acquisition. Smith phantom is known in the art, and consists of a lead plate with lots of pinholes in a rectangular array. Acquisition is done with the radioactive isotope having a known energy. For each of many n-tuples with a corresponding central light detector, in the preferred embodiment, image data is acquired. The images are distorted depending on the geometric arrangement or constellation of the light detectors, the light detector and electronic channel properties, and the method of the position calculation. The position of each pinhole from the phantom is determined. The second acquisition of the flood is needed to determine that the uniformity criterion is satisfied. This means that the number of counts in each area in between the position determined by the image of the pinholes and bounded by the splines which connect all the positions of the pinholes in horizontal and vertical direction. The number of counts in each image has to be statistically sufficient to determine the position of the pinholes, or to check if the uniformity criterion is satisfied. 
     In producing the position correction tables; in the preferred embodiment, for each n-tuple and for each matrix which is 1/32 of the size of the image of one n-tuple, coefficients for bilinear transformation are found and stored in the position correction table. 
     To apply the relative position correction 48 in real time; for each event, and depending on the central light detector of the n-tuple, address or label, and also depending on the first m bits of x coordinate and n bits of y coordinate, a particular address in the table is addressed. Position correction is performed by dividing the xy space of the incoming event (label, T, or sequential number of the central light detector in n-tuple, the relative positions x and y, E- total energy) into the one of the square matrices of 32×32, in the preferred embodiment. Each of the resulting matrices is bilinearly transformed to its proper position and shape. This produces the position corrected value for that event. 
     Circuit 50 calculates the absolute position correction in real time. For each event, after calculation of the relative addresses and depending on the central light detector of the n-tuple, address or label, the position of the n-tuple is added to the relative position inside the n-tuple to form the absolute address. 
     In the preferred embodiment, the energy independent position correction method consist of three well defined phases: First, acquisition of the position information; with one radioactive isotope with lower energy (approx. 100 keV) , and later with the radioactive isotopes in the medium (250 keV) and high energy ranges (511 keV). Second, producing the expansion correction factors in table form or function with interpolation for the energies between the acquired energies. 
     In the preferred embodiment, to improve the energy independent position correction method consist of three well defined phases: First, acquisition of the position information; with one radioactive isotope with lower energy (approx. 100 keV), and later with the radioactive isotopes in the medium (250 keV) and high energy ranges (511 keV). Second, producing the expansion correction factors in table form or function with interpolation for the energies between the acquired energies. In circuit 48, the expansion correction factors are applied to the X4 values calculated in 44. 
     It is known as a prior art that the analog part of the electronics can have offsets, and that the response of the electronics can be dependent on the count rate and temperature. Also it is known in the prior art that the variance of the position and the energy is not the same over the area of the light detectors. These errors can degrade the uniformity of the final image of the digital scintillation camera. In the preferred embodiment the final image consists of the multiplicity of the small images which are tiled in geometrical order to create the image of the area over the whole scintillation detector. In order to improve the uniformity of the final image, a new method is proposed. The proposed method consists of the random selection of the center light detectors in the calculation if the event is located near the edge of the light detector. If the random method is not employed, tiles are connected with the butt joints, and any small errors in the position, caused by tuning process or other errors is visible as high frequency artifacts, overlap or underlap which is unacceptable for medical diagnostics. With this proposed method instead of the butt joint between the two tiling images, there is a gradual overlap from one tiled image to the other. 
     In the preferred embodiment, the random selection is achieved by adding a small random variance to the center photodetector signal when it is determined that the event is near the edge of the photodetector, and then determining whether the small plus (+) or minus (-) amount changes the selection of the center light detector. If so, the remainder of the processing is carried out with the newly selected center light detector, however, the random variance added to the former center light detector value is removed so as not to affect the subsequent position and energy correction. Of course, this is done within circuit 44 and merely affects the determination of the T parameter to be passed on to circuit elements 48 and 46. 
     Although the preferred embodiment illustrates a purely digital camera, it is to be understood that the above described methods can be easily adapted to operate when analog position calculation is used. 
     As can be appreciated, many variations are possible within the scope of the present invention. Combinations of various embodiments is also possible and may be advantageous depending on the exact requirements of the camera desired.