Abstract:
This invention relates to drilling a well, particularly an oil or gas well, where casing or liner will be installed to stabilize the wellbore. The present invention is intended to permit more drilling and longer lengths of casing or liner to be installed at one time. The present invention includes a combination of a smear tool and specially sized granular lost circulation material solids in the drilling mud which work together to close and seal leaking formations and fractures whether pre-existing or induced by drilling. By the natural collection of the inventive solids along with the conventional particles in the drilling mud to form a filter cake at the problem areas along the wall of the wellbore and the smear tool arranged to compress the filter cake into the problem areas, lost circulation is minimized Maintaining circulation naturally allows for longer drilling cycles and potentially fewer liner joints in the well. As such, larger diameter boreholes are located in the hydrocarbon bearing formation and less time is spent installing casing or liner pipe.

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
       [0001]    This application is a continuation-in-part application which claims benefit under 35 USC §120 to U.S. application Ser. No. 12/790076 filed May 28, 2010, entitled “ENHANCED SMEAR EFFECT FRACTURE PLUGGING PROCESS FOR DRILLING SYSTEMS,” and to PCT Application Ser. No. PCT/US2010/036649 filed May 28, 2010, entitled “ENHANCED SMEAR EFFECT FRACTURE PLUGGING PROCESS FOR DRILLING SYSTEMS,” which designates the United States, both incorporated herein in their entirety; both of which in turn claim benefit to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/182,499 filed May 29, 2009, entitled “ENHANCED SMEAR EFFECT FRACTURE PLUGGING PROCESS FOR DRILLING SYSTEMS” which is incorporated herein in its entirety. 
     
    
     STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH 
       [0002]    None 
       FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
       [0003]    This invention relates to drilling wells for producing fluids such as oil and gas and particularly to drilling wells where fracturing and lost circulation is a concern. 
       BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
       [0004]    In the process of drilling oil and gas wells, drilling mud is injected into the center of the drill string to flow down to the drillbit and back up to the surface in the annulus between the outside of the wellbore and drillstring to carry the drill cuttings away from the bottom of the wellbore and out of the hole. The drilling mud is also used to prevent blowouts or kicks when the borehole is kept substantially full of drilling mud by maintaining head pressure on the formations being penetrated by the drillbit. A blowout or kick occurs when high pressure fluids such as oil and gas in downhole formations are released into the wellbore and rise rapidly to the surface. At the surface these fluids can potential release considerable energy that is hazardous to people and equipment. The drilling muds used for drilling oil and gas wells have been developed with weighting (densifying) agents to provide sufficient head pressure to prevent the initial release of high pressure fluids and gases from the formation. However, density alone does not solve the problem as the drilling mud may drain into one or more formations downhole lowering the volume of drilling mud in the hole and, thus, head pressure for the wellbore. The situation where drilling mud is draining into one or more formations is called “lost circulation.” 
         [0005]    Lost circulation and stuck pipe are two of the most costly problems faced while drilling oil and gas wells. To reduce the likelihood of lost circulation, particles of “lost circulation material” (commonly called “LCM”) are added to drilling muds to plug the formations into which the drilling mud is being lost. It is a simple and elegant solution in that the particles flow toward the leaking formation carried by the drilling mud and then collect in the leaking formation at the side of the wellbore. Eventually, however, when losses of drilling fluid become excessive, it is necessary to stop drilling and install a string of casing to seal off the portion of the existing wellbore so that drilling may re-commence at the bottom of the casing string. Installing casing or liner creates substantial costs as drilling is suspended while the casing is installed and cemented. Expenses for installing casing string are only part of the cost as the day rates for the drilling rig and personnel continue while further progress on drilling stops. 
         [0006]    It should also be noted that the interior dimension of the hole is reduced as each successive string of casing is added to the borehole. It is common to require a minimum diameter within the casing at the target zone in order to produce hydrocarbons that may be present when considering the space needed for tubing, valves, pumps and other equipment. Thus, the borehole is initially drilled substantially oversized anticipating successively smaller wellbore dimensions with each string of casing. It is also incumbent on the drilling crew to reach milestones before a new string of casing is installed so as to preserve final interior dimension of the casing. 
         [0007]    A drilling stabilizer and/or drill collar may be used in the bottom hole assembly (BHA) of a drill string. Drilling stabilizers mechanically stabilize the BHA in the borehole in order to avoid unintentional sidetracking, vibrations, and to ensure other drillstring components do not contact the wellbore wall. Drilling stabilizers are composed of a hollow cylindrical body and stabilizing blades, both made of high-strength steel. The blades can be either straight or spiraled, and may be hardfaced for wear resistance. Drill collars add weight to the drilling assembly to allow the bit to have greater force on the bottom of the hole. Drill collars may be slick or spiraled and are manufactured in a variety of diameters. Drill stabilizers and spiral drill collars have sharp edges that may cut or scrape the well bore, removing some of the filter cake already formed. 
         [0008]    The second area of substantial added cost for well drilling is when a pipe gets stuck in the hole. Drillstrings, casing, and wireline logging tools may stick in the wellbore. These pipes are often stuck because permeable zones allow the differential pressure of the drilling fluid hydrostatic pressure and formation pressure to stick the drill string against the filter cake with greater force than can be applied to pull the pipe loose. Drill collars are often “stabilized”, that is, stabilizers may be installed above and below the collars to prevent them from contacting the wall and becoming differentially stuck. In addition, wellbore collapse and spalling debris including rock may also cause a pipe to get stuck, trapping the drillstring in the wellbore. 
         [0009]    Casing drilling is an operation where the drill string is actual casing pipe instead of the normal smaller diameter drill pipe. The casing drilling process has been partially effective at reducing lost circulation and improving wellbore stability through what has been called the smear effect. The smear effect is the mechanical conditioning of the wellbore and any filter cake, reducing permeability and packing any fractures or loss zones with drilling mud and cuttings. However, casing drilling is not applicable to all wells and has not been effective at reducing these problems in all areas and for all well configurations. What is needed is a method to reduce or prevent lost circulation by smearing the wellbore without spalling or scraping. 
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
       [0010]    The present invention relates to a smear tools which are designed to press LCM, filter cake or cuttings into the fractures, voids, fissures, and vugs to plug leaks, increase wellbore strength, increase hoop stress, maintain well control and/or limit losses of the drilling fluid. The smear tools are designed to press the inside surfaces of the wellbore and not scrape or scratch the inside surface to avoid opening up any fractures, void, fissures, vugs and the like. 
         [0011]    In one embodiment a smear tool may be 10-70 feet in length, containing either helical or straight blades manufactured as a solid or welded blade that covers up to 90 percent of the tool section. The smear tool should have an outer diameter that occupies 75 to 95% of the Nominal Hole Diameter (NHD) which may be calculated or modeled using a variety of techniques. Flow through channels, called junk slots, allow fluids, cuttings, and LCM to flow over or through the smear tool and press solid materials into the wall of the formation. The smear tool surfaces in the flow through channels are designed to capture solids against the formation wall and smear the solids with a trowel surface into the wall of the formation. Multiple smear tool designs are presented although the smear tool has four basic surfaces including a leading edge, capture surface, trowel surface, and a trailing edge. 
         [0012]    In another embodiment, a smear tool with a smooth trowel surface smears filter cake, cuttings, or LCM into the wellbore. The smooth trowel surface has a leading edge, a capture surface, a smear surface, and a trailing edge. The smear tool may be greater than 3 meters or 10 feet in length, and the smooth trowel covers up to 95 percent of the smear tool length, said smear tool smooth trowel diameter is at least 75% of the NHD, and the smooth trowel compresses particles into the wellbore while drilling. The leading edge has a radial distance that his less than the radial distance of the trailing edge from the tool body. 
         [0013]    In an additional embodiment, a trowel tool is provided with a smooth trowel surface attached to the tool body, where the smooth trowel surface is at least 3 meters (10 feet) in length, the smooth trowel surface covers up to 95 percent of the trowel tool length, the trowel tool diameter is at least 75% of the NHD, and the smooth trowel compresses particles into the wellbore while drilling. 
         [0014]    Additionally, a process for drilling a wellbore includes determining a rate of progress (ROP) for a drill string, placing at least 0.5 meters of smooth trowel surface for each meter per hour of ROP, drilling a wellbore using a smooth trowel surface to increase compaction of solids into fissures and decrease lost circulation, wherein said smooth trowel surface is at least 10 feet (3 meters) in length, the smooth trowel surface covers up to 95 percent of the tool length, the tool diameter is at least 75% of the NHD, and the smooth trowel surface compresses particles into the wellbore without scraping or scratching the wellbore surface. 
         [0015]    The smear tool may have a straight trowel or a helical trowel. The smear tool may have one, two, three, four, five, six, or more trowel surfaces distributed around the smear tool to provide a consistent smear effect. The smooth trowel surface may be greater than 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, or 90 feet (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 20, 25, or 30 meters) in length. The smooth trowel surface diameter may be about 75, 80, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, or 99 percent of the NHD. One, two, three, four, five, or more smear tools may be used in the drill string to provide a consistent smear effect across a longer portion of the drill string. A combination of an eccentric smear tool, a concentric smear tool and/or a smooth trowel tool may be used to increase contact of the smooth trowel surface with the wellbore. 
         [0016]    In another embodiment, lost circulation material including ground nut shells; calcium carbonate; graphite; coke; carbon; sulfur; plastic; resins; sand; crushed rock; metal particles; ceramic particles; glass beads; expanded perlite particles; hard rubber compound particles; urethane particles; crushed cement; and/or crushed coal may be circulated with the smear tool and/or trowel tool to fill in pores and fissures. 
         [0017]    Additionally, a drilling fluid may be used containing granular lost circulation material wherein the lost circulation material comprises particles for accomplishing enhanced smear fracture plugging where the lost circulation material particles have a particle size distribution from about 100 microns to about 1500 microns with substantial populations of particles throughout the entire range of the particle size distribution. The particles of the lost circulation material are also in the drilling fluid in a range from at least 0.5 pound per barrel up to 15 pounds per barrel to flow with the drilling fluid and also to form plugs at any lost circulation areas at the periphery of the wellbore and form a filter cake at such lost circulation areas and block or reduce fluid flow from the wellbore into the lost circulation areas. A drillstring is provided with at least one smear section along a portion of the perimeter of the drillstring to smear filter cakes of lost circulation material into lost circulation areas and compress the lost circulation material into more secure plugs to enhance the performance of the lost circulation material at the lost circulation areas, where the smear section has a smear surface that has an effective diameter of at least about 75% of the diameter of the wellbore and smears the walls of the wellbore as the drill string rotates. The drillstring is rotated to drill the wellbore further into the earth and turn the smear section so that the smear surface smears along the inside surface of the wellbore and especially press the lost circulation materials into a plug of more dense mass of particles and condition the lost circulation areas to reduce lost circulation, pipe sticking, and spalling. 
         [0018]    While the first preferred range of particle size distribution for the lost circulation material is in the range from 100 microns to 1500 microns it is more preferred to have the range extend to various wider ranges where the lower end of the range is 75 microns and even as low as 50 microns. The upper end of the range may more preferably about 2000 microns, about 2500 microns, about 3000 microns, about 3500 microns and including as high as about 4000 microns. It should be noted that across the range, substantial populations of particles should present in the drilling fluid to be available for plugging lost circulation zones or areas. 
         [0019]    In a particularly preferred arrangement the lost circulation material comprises a combination of about one third fine ground nut hulls with a d50 of about 600 microns; about one third medium ground nut hulls with a d50 of 1500 microns; and one third coarse ground calcium carbonate 250 with a d50 of 250 microns. The d50 number is the diameter of the particle that is within the range where fifty percent of the particles are smaller and fifty percent of the particles are larger. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         [0020]    The embodiment of the invention which uses a special smear tool instead of casing drilling techniques, together with further advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which: 
           [0021]      FIG. 1  is a front elevation view of a first embodiment of a smear tool of the present invention; 
           [0022]      FIG. 2  is a top cross sectional view of the first embodiment of the smear tool inside a borehole; 
           [0023]      FIG. 3  is a front elevation view of a second embodiment of a smear tool of the present invention; 
           [0024]      FIG. 4  is a top cross sectional view of the second embodiment of the smear tool inside a borehole; 
           [0025]      FIG. 5  is a front elevation view of a third embodiment of a smear tool of the present invention; 
           [0026]      FIG. 6  is a top cross sectional view of the third embodiment of the smear tool inside a borehole; 
           [0027]      FIG. 7  is a front elevation view of fourth, fifth and sixth embodiments which are similar from the front perspective of a smear tool of the present invention; 
           [0028]      FIG. 8  is a top cross sectional view of the fourth embodiment of the smear tool; 
           [0029]      FIG. 9  is a top cross sectional view of the fifth embodiment of the smear tool; 
           [0030]      FIG. 10  is a top cross sectional view of the sixth embodiment of the smear tool; 
           [0031]      FIG. 11  is a front elevation view of a seventh embodiment of the smear tool; 
           [0032]      FIG. 12  is a top view of the seventh embodiment of the smear tool; 
           [0033]      FIG. 13  is a top view of different smear tool configurations comprising a variety of leading edge, capture surface, trowel surface, and training edge configurations; 
           [0034]      FIG. 14  demonstrates a smear tool with two or more junk slots, 
           [0035]      FIG. 15  is a top view of a single lobed trowel that may be either machined A or welded B to create an eccentric tool; and 
           [0036]      FIG. 16  is a side view of A) a BHA with one or more smear tool sections and B) a detail of a smear tool section. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
       [0037]    Turning now to the preferred arrangement for the present invention, reference is made to the drawings to enable a more clear understanding of the invention. However, it is to be understood that the inventive features and concept may be manifested in other arrangements and that the scope of the invention is not limited to the embodiments described or illustrated. The scope of the invention is intended only to be limited by the scope of the claims that follow. 
         [0038]    As a wellbore is drilled from the surface down into the earth through many layers of rock, sand, shale, clay and other formations, many of these formations are relatively impermeable. In other words, these impermeable formations generally do not accommodate liquids or permit gas or liquids to pass through. However, there are formations that are permeable and some of these permeable formations have fluids that are under pressure. The fluids primarily include both salt and fresh water but may include oil, natural gas and mixtures of these and other fluids. Fluids that are under pressure in formations in the ground present a concern to the drilling operators in that a lot of force may be released through the penetration of such formations by the drilling equipment. In the event of an uncontrolled release of such high pressure fluids into the borehole may cause a destructive blowout. 
         [0039]    As used herein “smear tool” refers to a tool with a flat surface that can press cuttings, debris, filter cake and LCM into the well bore. The smear tool is designed not to scrape, but to smear the mud filter cake, cuttings, and LCM into a nearly impermeable cake. A variety of smear tool designs and configurations are shown in  FIGS. 1-16 . 
         [0040]    As used herein “trowel tool” refers to a smooth surfaced tool that is either solid or hollow with ribs attached to the tool body. 
         [0041]    As used herein “junk slot” refers to a channel in the exterior of a tool that allows mud, cuttings, and debris to flow past the tool. In some embodiments the junk slot may be a channel in other embodiments the junk slot may be a hole in the body of the tool that allows fluids and debris to flow through the tool. 
         [0042]    As used herein “Bottom Hole Assembly” or BHA refers to the drill bit, drill collars, stabilizers, actuators, and associated equipment. The BHA may be approximately 10-100 meters in length or more and have a variety of configurations. BHA configurations may be adapted to the type of drill bit used, the well type, well size, drilling operator, and the like. 
         [0043]    Meters, yards and feet may be used herein for distance calculations. Typically one meter is roughly three feet but for more accurate calculations 1.00 meter is equal to 3.28 feet or 1.09 yards. 
         [0044]    As previously described, to maintain control of high pressure fluids, drilling fluids have been developed that have high density to maintain high wellbore pressure that is higher than any expected formation pressure. High density is conventionally achieved by the addition of weighting agents or densifying agents that comprise small, but very dense particles. Particle sizes of such weighting agents is typically less than 100 microns. Even without weighting agents, drilling fluids typically accumulate very small particles called drilling solids that are also about 100 microns or less, depending on the mesh size of the shaker screens. The drilling fluid accumulates particles of this size as they are believed to created as cuttings break-up or fracture and because of their small size, are not removed by mesh size of the shakers. Thus, drill cuttings larger than 100 microns are typically removed at the surface to avoid having the drilling fluid becoming overwhelmed with cuttings before being recirculated into the well. 
         [0045]    Drilling fluids have a number of functions such as lubricating moving parts, cooling the bit and carrying drill cuttings to the surface. The maintenance of wellbore pressure is simply another important function of drilling mud or drilling fluid. However, the drilling fluid level must be closely monitored as the drillbit will encounter and create fractures, fissures and highly porous regions that will receive or adsorb the drilling fluid. Drilling fluid is continuously added to the wellbore, but in the event that fluid loss is substantially faster than the rate that the drilling fluid is added, the fluid head pressure in the wellbore reduces and the vulnerability of experiencing a kick or blowout increases. Again, drilling fluid technology has advanced to aid in managing this situation as well. In particular, modern drilling fluids include particles that collect at the fractures, fissures, vugs and porous regions to close off these openings to further fluid loss. These particles collect at these porous formations forming a plug, or filter cake where the liquid fluid has already passed out of the wellbore and into the formation. 
         [0046]    To enhance the effectiveness of the particles in sealing these openings like porous formations and induced fractures, a combination of a drill string having certain physical characteristics along with a preferred selection of lost circulation material present in the drilling fluid has shown surprising results in maintaining the stability of the walls of the wellbore for longer periods so that the drilling of longer well sections between installation of casing strings is practical. The reduction of a single casing string is a significant financial advantage for a oil or gas well as most of the cost for casing a borehole is in the number of strings installed, not so much the depth of each casing string. In other words, there is not much additional cost in adding more length to a single casing string and a well of a certain depth is far less expensive with three casing strings versus four casing strings. 
         [0047]    The present invention provides a means of mechanically conditioning permeable formations to reduce their permeability thereby reducing the likelihood and amount of lost circulation, reducing the likelihood of differential sticking of the drillstring to the side of the wellbore, and mechanically conditioning unstable formations to reduce the likelihood of breakout of rock (spalling) and wellbore collapse which also causes stuck pipe. 
         [0048]    Thus, the advantage of the present invention in permitting longer and deeper drilling cycles by maintaining the integrity of the open walls of the wellbore cannot be overstated. 
         [0049]    Focusing on the physical characteristics of the drillstring of the present invention which includes a smear section which can be directly above the BHA or one or more smear tools may be placed within the drill string to mechanically press the particles or filter cake into the openings and fissures of the wellbore. The smear tool has a diameter of at least 75 percent of the diameter of the wellbore for at least 10% of the length over at least the bottom 300 feet of the drillstring. A smear section may include casing and liner drilling, sometimes called “casing while drilling.”. The smear tool or the large diameter segments cause smearing and compression and compaction of the cake and solids into the openings and fissures in the walls of the wellbore. It is believed that this action of smearing and compression and compaction of the particles maintains the stability of the wellbore and specifically the walls for more effective maintenance of the circulation of the drilling mud. One preferred example of such a smear tool is casing or liner drilling where the drillstring is large diameter and the annular space for carrying the cuttings to the surface is “tight” in comparison to the diameter of a conventional drill string. Casing drilling is not simply the substitution of casing for drillpipe as the drillbits are different and issues with directional drilling are significant for a casing string that is much less tolerant of bending. 
         [0050]    The preferred lost circulation material is preferably a combination of one or more certain granular materials having a preferred particle size distribution. What is believed to make an effective LCM is to have a relatively broad particle size distribution where substantial populations of particles exist throughout the entire particle size distribution. Where existing LCM&#39;s seem to fall short is that there is insufficient populations of particles at portions of the needed particle size distribution. The present invention was at least partially inspired when lost circulation problems were resolved by adding extra amounts of smaller particle size materials. Apparently, there are lost circulation zones that are not adequately plugged without particles in a broad range of sizes that are also subjected to the smearing of a smear surface. With the present invention, lower amounts of LCM may be added or maintained in the drilling fluid. It is conventional to provide LCM at ten pounds per barrel in the drilling fluid. With the present invention, LCM may be present about less than about eight pounds per barrel and may more preferably be present at less than five pounds per barrel. 
         [0051]    The most preferred materials are selected from ground nut hulls and calcium carbonate (ground marble) and combinations thereof although other suitable known LCM material or proppant materials may be used. The suitable choices include granular materials such as ground nut shells, calcium carbonate, graphite, coke, carbon, sulfur, plastic, resins, sand, crushed rock of all types, metal particles, ceramics, glass beads, expanded perlite, hard rubber compounds, urethane, crushed cement, crushed coal, and mixtures of one or more such materials, but are not limited to these materials. The preferred LCM may be formulated into a single blended product or it can be formulated at the wellsite using a combination of products where the full spectrum of particle size distribution is provided into the drilling fluid. The particle size distribution is a particularly important aspect of the LCM such that minimal amounts (less than about 6%) are smaller than about 128 micron or 120 mesh and trace amounts are larger than 2001 microns or 5 mesh. The formulation includes at least two percent at about 120 mesh or 128 micron with an increasing population from 120 mesh to 10 mesh so that the highest population being between 36 and 10 mesh based on weight percent. This formulation having the median particle size in the range between 500 and 2000 microns 
         [0052]    A second example of an effective combination of granular LCM&#39;s is: ⅓ (by weight) of fine ground nut hulls called “Nut Hulls Fine” in the trade (which are ground nut hulls with a d50 of about 600 microns); ⅓ (by weight) of medium ground nut hulls called “Nut Hulls Medium” in the trade (which are ground nut hulls with a d50 of about 1500 microns); and ⅓ by weight Calcium Carbonate 250 (which is ground marble with a d50 of 250 microns) or ground nut shells in the same size range. 
         [0053]    These particle size distributions (“PSD”s) are known to be effective for certain pipe to hole diameter ratios, bit types and formations so that lower concentrations (typically measured in pounds per barrel) may be confidently used, but this invention is not limited to these exact PSD&#39;s. The key feature of this invention is that the particle size distribution is selected to be between or overlap the particle size of the drilling fluid being used (usually 0 to 100/150 microns) and the drill cuttings (usually with a d10&gt;250 microns) being generated. For larger drill cutting sizes the PSD would have much larger particles and the concentration within any given range may be more or less than the preferred example above. 
         [0054]    Another way of describing the preferred range of particle size distribution is that the range is from about 100 microns to about 1500 microns where substantial populations of particles throughout the range are present in the drilling fluid. It is more preferred to have the lower end of the range be about 75 or even as low as about 50 microns. The upper end of the range may be about 2000 microns, about 2500 microns, about 3000 microns, about 3500 microns and including about 4000 microns. 
         [0055]    The concentration of the mixed, granular LCM should be about 0.5 to 15 ppb (pounds per barrel of drilling fluid). In practice, the LCM is added to the drilling fluid continuously at this concentration while drilling. The LCM particles are large enough that when the drilling fluid returns to the surface and goes over the shale shakers on the drilling rig, the LCM is removed by the shaker screens. As a result, the LCM would need to be replenished, but there may be times where the shakers might be bypassed for a short duration of drilling so that the LCM would be recycled. Also, shaker systems are available that can recycle a specific desired size range or PSD for LCM into the drilling fluid. 
         [0056]    As described above, in some arrangements, the smear tool is actually the casing or liner pipe when drilling by a method known as casing or liner drilling. It is not always practical to drill with casing or liner pipe for various known reasons such as where the additional costs of casing drilling are not justified, or when the well is a deviated well and casing resists bending or the casing connections are too weak. 
         [0057]    To obtain the benefits of smearing where casing or liner drilling is not suitable, several smear tools have been developed which are designed to press the special LCM, filter cake and cuttings into the fractures, voids, fissures and vugs to plug leaks, increase wellbore strength due to increased hoop stress, maintain well control and/or limit losses of the drilling fluid. The smear tools are designed to press the inside surfaces of the wellbore and not scrape or scratch the inside surface to avoid opening up any fractures, void, fissures, vugs and the like. 
         [0058]    Referring now to  FIGS. 1 and 2 , a first embodiment of a smear tool is indicated by the arrow  10 . The smear tool comprises a main body  14  that may be characterized as a pipe joint or drillpipe joint that is approximately the same diameter as conventional drillpipe. While a typical length of drillpipe is 30 feet, the smear tool is shown being shorter. The length of a smear tool could be from about 5 feet long to 60 feet long. The smear tool includes external pipe threads  15  at the base and internal pipe threads  17  at the top with an axial passage  18  indicated by dashed lines. All smear tools presented herein may have any number of different threaded connection orientations, including “pin-up”, “double pin”, and “double box” or others. With the threads  15  and  17 , the smear tool may be added to a drillstring between two joints of drillpipe or other tools in the BHA and the axial passage is aligned with and approximately the same dimension as the passage through the drillpipe. Attached to the periphery of the body of the smear tool is the trowel  20 . Trowel  20  is comprised of a helical blade that wraps around the body of the smear tool  10  with a small front nose  21  and a broader trailing end  22 . The working surfaces of the trowel  20  are the leading surface  25  and the main smear surface  26 . The leading surface  25  is shaped to capture the particles P along the inside wall W of the wellbore and push the particles firmly against the wall W as the smear tool  10  rotates with the drillstring. Main smear surface  26  follows the leading surface to maintain and continue a broad pressure on the particles that form the cake. As the particles are forced into tighter proximity, the interstitial spacing between the particles is reduced and the rate at which fluids may pass through the compressed filter cake should be reduced. While the trowel  20  is not shown to have fully wrapped around the body of the smear tool  10 , an extended smear tool with one or more full wraps may easily be seen to meet the general features shown in  FIG. 1 . 
         [0059]    A second embodiment of the invention is shown in  FIGS. 3 and 4  where a smear tool is indicated by arrow  110 . The smear tool  110  is very similar to smear tool  10  except that the trowel is formed of a number of segments. Four segments are illustrated and indicated by numbers  120 A,  120 B,  120 C and  120 D. Each segment is spring mounted to accommodate deflection of each of the trowel segments by springs  129  while pins  131  help maintain alignment of the trowel segments with the body of the smear tool  110 . The purpose of allowing deflection is so that the smear tool will have less negative effect on the directional drilling aspect of a well operation. This deflection and movement of the segments may also be achieved by hydraulic pressure and pistons. 
         [0060]    Another embodiment of the invention is shown in  FIGS. 5 and 6  where smear tool  210  is shown to have two trowels extended approximately the length of the body  214  of the tool. The trowels  220  include a contour similar to the prior embodiments to press the particles of cuttings and the filter cake into the wall of the wellbore. With two trowels  220 , it is expected that more pressure will be imposed on the filter cake. It should also be understood that three, four and more trowels could be mounted on the underlying body of the smear tool. It should also be seen that the trowels  220  are straight rather than helical which should be easier to construct. 
         [0061]    A fourth embodiment of the invention is shown in  FIGS. 7 and 8  where smear tool  310  is shown with a full jacket trowel  320 . The jacket fully wraps around the body of the smear tool  310  where the diameter of the full jacket trowel  320  is only slightly less than the diameter of the drillbit. There is no leading surface, but the upper and lower edges  325  of the full jacket trowel  320  are preferably angled inwardly to give the wall of the wellbore some relief as the tool is moved up and down the hole. In the fourth embodiment shown in  FIG. 8 , the full jacket trowel is a solid mass attached to the body  314 . This is quite simple, but might be rather heavy. 
         [0062]    A fifth embodiment of the smear tool  410  is shown in  FIG. 9  although it would appear relatively indistinguishable from the fourth embodiment as shown in  FIG. 7 . Thus, in  FIG. 9 , radial ribs connect the trowel  420  to body  414 . As compared to the fourth embodiment the hollow trowel has a reduced volume of material, and the weight and perhaps the cost would be less. The embodiment in  FIG. 9  is anticipated to operate in an equivalent manner to the embodiment in  FIG. 8 . 
         [0063]    In  FIG. 10 , a sixth embodiment of the smear tool  510  is similar to the fifth embodiment except that the hollow trowel  520  is mounted to the body  514  by flexible ribs  529 . Thus, while the massive trowel  520  is able to contact a lot of the wall of the wellbore, there is significant flexibility for wells that are deviating where the drillpipe may be moving around within the wellbore. 
         [0064]    In  FIGS. 11 and 12 , a seventh embodiment of the smear tool  610  is shown having a large body  614  and roller trowels  620 . Three roller trowels are shown evenly spaced around the body  614 , but more or fewer roller trowels  620  could be installed. The body includes recesses to receive the roller trowels  620  and provides rotation on axes  620   a  with mounts upon which the roller trowels may freely rotate as the roller trowels come into contact with the wall of the wellbore. The roller trowels  620  have a generally smooth perimeter that rolls along the inside wall of the wellbore to smear the LCM and cuttings against the wall without scarifying the wall. 
         [0065]    These various embodiments of the smear tools would preferably be installed in a drilling assembly, preferably the bottom hole assembly to bring the smear tool as close to the bit as practical. This is desirable because the benefit of the smear tool will only occur when the smear tool reaches the formation. The farther back in the drilling assembly the smear tool is, the longer is the time before the formations are smeared and strengthened. It may be necessary to space multiple smear tools periodically in the drill string. As noted above, it is desirable that the ratio of the smear tool diameter to the wellbore diameter to be greater than 0.75. 
         [0066]    It is also desirable that the smear tool would contact all 360 degrees of the borehole circumference at some time during one rotation. If it does not, then some of the wellbore would still be weak—unsmeared. It is desirable, but not critical, that the smear tool would not affect the directional properties of the bottom hole assembly and drilling assembly. If the smear tool is nearly full gage and rigid, it would act like a stabilizer which would impede progress for other aspects of the drilling operation. 
         [0067]    It is also desirable that the smear tool smashes cuttings and added LCM into the wellbore wall, not just existing filter cake and mud solids. So the smear tool is designed to direct the flow of mud and cuttings between the tool and the wellbore. Smearing cuttings into the wall may be very important to plugging natural or induced fractures or vugs. 
         [0068]    The diameter of these smear tools, for most circumstances, will preferably not be full gage. Typically the preferred diameter would range from about 75 to about 95% of the hole diameter (similar to a casing or liner outside diameter). It is recognized that in certain formations, smear tools that are very close to or at the diameter of the hole might be desirable. The ends of the smear tool may be tapered to facilitate transport down the well bore and prevent scraping at the toe and heal of the tool. The tool may also have a variety of features including different threads and locking mechanisms, recesses for fishing tools and handling, as well as channels holes for equipment, wires, hydraulics and other mechanical features. 
       EXAMPLE 1 
     Lost Circulation Material 
       [0069]    The invention was tested in several wells in the Kuparuk and Tarn fields in Alaska and two wells in the Piceance field in western Colorado. Each well was drilled using casing drilling or sometimes called casing while drilling (CwD). The first well in the Piceance field using CwD had substantial fluid losses of 13,900 barrels and the smear effect was never realized even though several types of conventional LCMs were used. The second well in the Piceance field using CwD used the special LCM blend and had fluid losses of only 6,500 barrels, the data from this well, Table 1, illustrates the effectiveness of the LCM. 
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 1 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 LCM reduced Loss Rate 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 CwD with normal 
                 CwD with special 
               
               
                   
                 LCM Blend 
                 LCM Blend 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Loss Rate 
                 &gt;100 bph (barrels 
                 0 bph 
               
               
                   
                   
                 per hour) 
               
               
                   
                 Percent Returns 
                 58% 
                 100% 
               
               
                   
                 LCM Particle size 
                 250-2000 microns 
                 75-2000 microns 
               
               
                   
                 distribution 
               
               
                   
                 LCM 
                 1.5 lb/bbl 
                 2.5 lb/bbl 
               
               
                   
                 Concentration 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0070]    The third well in the Piceance field using CwD with the special LCM blend had fluid losses of only 3,700 barrels. This is a 73% reduction in fluid loss as compared to the 13,900 barrels of fluid loss in the first well which used conventional LCM. 
         [0071]    Another measure of the smear effect is an increase in the maximum pressure that the wellbore will tolerate before fracturing and having fluid losses. This maximum pressure is usually expressed in terms of an equivalent density in pounds per gallon and is measured by imposing pressure on a fluid column at the surface. The higher the equivalent density, the less likely the well is to have fluid losses and longer the well can be the deepened before running and cementing the casing. 
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 2 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 LCM Density 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                   
                 Kuparuk Field Test  
                 Kuparuk Field Test 
               
               
                   
                 Tarn Field Test 
                 #1 
                 #2 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Initial 
                 Final 
                 Initial 
                 Final 
                 Initial 
                 Final 
               
               
                   
                 before 
                 after 
                 before 
                 after 
                 before 
                 after 
               
               
                   
                 special 
                 special  
                 special 
                 special 
                 special 
                 special 
               
               
                   
                 LCM 
                 LCM 
                 LCM 
                 LCM 
                 LCM 
                 LCM 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Maximum 
                 13.0 
                 15.7 
                 12.7 
                 14.4 
                 13.4 
                 18.0 
               
               
                 Equivalent 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 Density (lbs/gal) 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 Increase in 
                 2.7 
                 1.7 
                 4.6 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Maximum 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 Equivalent 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 Density (lbs/gal) 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 LCM Particle 
                   
                 75-2000 
                   
                 75-2000 
                   
                 75-1700 
               
               
                 size distribution 
                   
                 microns 
                   
                 microns 
                   
                 microns 
               
               
                 LCM 
                   
                 1.4 lb/bbl 
                   
                 3.0 lb/bbl 
                   
                 2.0 lb/bbl 
               
               
                 Concentration 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
       EXAMPLE 2 
     Smear Tool 
       [0072]    The smear tool offers a unique opportunity to reduce circulation loss and continue drilling even through unconsolidated reservoirs. The smear tool is used while drilling and placed as close as possible to the BHA. With one of several unique designs shown in  FIG. 13 , the smear tool is able to press cuttings, debris and (if present) lost circulation material into the wall of the formation. By pressing these materials into the wall and repeatedly smoothing the wall, hoop stress is increased and the wall is consolidated, preventing lost circulation. 
         [0073]    The Smear Tool balances two competing interests by providing the right trowel surface without sticking to the well bore filter cake. The each smear tool design in  FIG. 13  has a leading edge  721 , a capture surface  725 , a smear surface  726  also referred to as a trowel, and a trailing edge  722  designed to reduce scraping while smoothing the wellbore wall. The trowel may have straight trowels  220  that run straight along the length of the tool body as shown in  FIG. 5  or helical trowels  20  that wrap around the tool body as shown in  FIG. 1 . Straight trowels are beneficial because they may be easily welded to the tool body. Helical trowels although difficult to weld, may be machined into the surface of the tool.  FIG. 13A  demonstrates a smear tool with a well defined junk slot between the trailing edge  722  of one trowel and the leading edge  721  of the adjacent trowel.  FIG. 13B  is similar to  13 A with an angled junk slot and shallower leading edge  721  and a longer capture surface  725 .  FIG. 13C  provides a simple junk slot with a large smear surface  726 . The simple junk slot and small capture surface allow the smear tool to be machined easily and provides a large smear surface. The junk slot should be designed to accept the LCM and cuttings and press them in to the wall of the well bore. The more narrow junk slot design of  FIGS. 13  A, B, and C and in  FIGS. 14  A, B, C, D, and E cause an improvement in the migration of drill cuttings and added lost circulation material particles from the flowing fluid onto the capture surface and then to the smear surface due to the rotation of the drill string and centrifugal force acting on the cuttings causing them to migrate towards the counterclockwise and outward direction. 
         [0074]    Smear tool length is determined by the rate of penetration (ROP) for the drill string. Ideally the smear tool would press the unconsolidated well bore for 30 minutes to one hour or more. Although smearing the well bore for less time is still beneficial, best results are obtained when the smear tool contacts the well bore at a specific depth for at least 45 minutes depending upon the formation type and amount of lost circulation. Longer residence time will only increase the benefit of using the smear tool by smearing additional solids into the pores and fissures of the wellbore. By multiplying the ROP in meters per hour by the minutes of residence time per hour, you obtain a rough estimate of the desired tool length in meters. 
         [0000]      ROP(m/h)*Residence Time/60 min=Tool Length in meters 
         [0000]    ROP may be measured in feet per hour and the length of the smear tool may be measured in feet. These values may be calculated and used interchangeably where 1 meter is equal to approximately 3 feet and feet per hour is approximately ⅓ of meters per hour. Table 3 depicts multiple ROP&#39;s and the minimum and optimum smear tool length. ROP and thus smear tool length may be affected by lithology, drilling mud, bit condition and type, as well as other factors. Since drilling will occur through a variety of lithologies, the tool length will likely be determined by looking at a variety of ROP values and identifying a tool length that will work across all ROP values. 
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 3 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Tool Length determined by ROP 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Minimum 
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 ROP 
                 Length 
                 Residence 
                 Optimum 
                 Residence 
               
               
                 (meters/hour) 
                 (meters) 
                 Time (min) 
                 Length (feet) 
                 Time (hours) 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 3.2 m/h  
                 1.6 m 
                 30 min 
                 3.2 m  
                 1 hr 
               
               
                  5 m/h 
                 2.5 m 
                 30 min 
                  5 m 
                 1 hr 
               
               
                 10 m/h 
                   5 m 
                 30 min 
                 10 m 
                 1 hr 
               
               
                 20 m/h 
                  10 m 
                 30 min 
                 20 m 
                 1 hr 
               
               
                 25 m/h 
                 12.5 m  
                 30 min 
                 25 m 
                 1 hr 
               
               
                 30 m/h 
                  15 m 
                 30 min 
                 30 m 
                 1 hr 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0075]    As shown in Table 3, smear tool lengths may range from approximately 1.7 meters (5 feet) to over 30 meters (90 feet) dependent upon formation conditions and ROP. Although standard pipe sections range from 6.7 to 25 meters (20 to 75 ft), smear tool surface will typically be less than that of the pipe section. In some instances, pipe threading, fishing connectors, and the like must be present. In order to achieve longer smear tool lengths, two or more smear tool sections may be placed in the drill string to achieve a longer residence time. In the 30 m/h example above, the smear tool may consist of three 10 meter (30 ft) smear tools achieving a total smear tool length of about 27 to 30 meters (80 to 90 ft). 
         [0076]    As part of a drillstring, the smear tool has limitations on the total length of the smooth trowel surface when compared to the total length of the smear tool body. Frequently drillstring tools must have threads, connectors, catches and the like at the leading and/or trailing edge to allow the tool to connect with other sections and/or be retrieved during fishing operations. Thus even though the tool body is 7 to 25 meters (20 to 75 ft), the smooth trowel surface may only be 75, 80, 83, 85, 90, 95 or 99 percent of the total tool length. When calculating residency time it is important to ensure that the smooth trowel surface has sufficient residence time to smooth the wellbore and fill any voids with material, typically 30 min, 40 min, 45 min, 50 min, 55 min, 60 min or more residence time will ensure fissures and holes are filled reducing the need to line unconsolidated sections of the well and prevent lost circulation. 
       EXAMPLE 3 
     Trowel Tool 
       [0077]    The trowel tool offers the benefits of the smear tool but does not have channels that direct the LCM, filter cake, or cuttings to the wellbore. The trowel tool shown in  FIGS. 7-10  has solid jacket  320  that fully wraps around the body of the smear tool  310  where the diameter of the full jacket trowel  320  is approximately the diameter of the drillbit or other tools on the drillstring. There is no leading surface, but the upper and lower edges  325  of the full jacket trowel  320  are preferably angled inwardly to give the wall of the wellbore some relief as the tool is moved up and down the hole. In the fourth embodiment shown in  FIG. 8 , the full jacket trowel is a solid mass attached to the body  314 . This is quite simple, but might be too heavy for some BHA configurations. One option is to use radial ribs as shown in  FIG. 9  to connect the trowel  420  to body  414 . In  FIG. 10 , the trowel  520  is mounted to the body  514  by flexible ribs  529 . Thus, while the massive trowel  520  is able to contact a lot of the wall of the wellbore while maintaining significant flexibility for wells that are deviating where the drillpipe may be moving around within the wellbore. The trowel tool may be used in conjunction with the smear tool to achieve an appropriate smear length. In other words to achieve a 20 m (60 ft) optimum smear length a 10 m (30 ft) smear tool may be used with a 10 m (30 ft) trowel tool to achieve approximately 20 m (60 ft) of smear length. 
       EXAMPLE 4 
     Drilling with a Smear Tool 
       [0078]    In  FIG. 16A , a BHA  830  contains from top to bottom, a motor  840 , an actuator  845  for directional drilling, and a drill bit  850 . This is a simplified view of a BHA which may contain additional equipment. The BHA may also be assembled without an actuator, may have an articulated drill bit, may contain a variety of stabilizer and collar assemblies, or may not have any stabilizers or collar assemblies. One or more smear tool sections,  820 A and optionally  820 B, may be placed above the BHA  830  or be incorporated into the design of the other BHA componenets in or above  830 . One or more sections of drill pipe (not shown) may be placed between the smear tool  820 A and the BHA  830 . Additionally the smear tool will have a larger diameter than the standard pipe sections. In instances where there is a change in diameter an intermediate connector may be used to reduce problems with changes in pipe diameter. If a stabilizer is used, it may hinder smear tool contact and reduce smear tool effectiveness. In order to ensure smear tool contact with the wellbore surface the smear tool should be placed away from or should be larger than any stabilizers if used in the BHA. 
         [0079]    In  FIG. 16B  a smear tool section  820  is connected to an intermediate connector  860  which is connected to a smaller pipe  855 . The smear tool body  814  may be a variety of sizes dependent upon the NHD which will also affect the size of the drill pipe used  855 . Drill pipes range from 2⅜ inches to 8⅜ inches or larger. Pipe sizes continue to increase as demands for longer and larger wells continues. Typical drill pipe diameters include 2⅜″, 2⅞″, 3½″, 4″, 4½″, 5″, 5½″, 6⅝″, and 8⅜″ or 5 cm, 6 cm, 7 cm, 8 cm, 9 cm, 10 cm, 11 cm, 12 cm, 13 cm, 14 cm, 15 cm, 16 cm, 17 cm, 18 cm 19 cm, 20 cm, 21 cm, 22 cm, 23 cm, 24 cm, 25 cm as well as other sizes not listed. When an intermediate connector  860  is required, the transition from smaller pipe  855  diameter to intermediate connector  860  is preferably less than 1½″ or 3.5 cm although other custom diameter pieces may be used. In one embodiment a 6⅜″ drill pipe is connected to a 8⅜″ smear tool with a 8⅜″ connector. In instances where a much larger bit is used several intermediate connectors  860  may be used to gradually increase pipe diameter to that of the smear tool  820 . In one example a 5½″ drill pipe may be increased to 6⅝″ diameter intermediate connector which is then increased with another 8⅜″ diameter intermediate connector which may then be connected to an 8⅜″ diameter smear tool. In other embodiments a 2⅜″ diameter pipe may be connected to a 3½″ diameter intermediate connector, a 2⅞″ diameter pipe may be connected to a 4″ intermediate connector, a 4″ diameter pipe may be connected to a 5½″ intermediate connector, and the like. The use of connectors allows the smear tool to be a larger diameter. This allows the trowel to extend to 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 99 or greater percent diameter of the NHD. Table 4 provides multiple examples of NHDs, drill pipes, and smear tool diameters that will achieve a consistent smear effect. 
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 4 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Smear Tool Diameter 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                   
                   
                 Smear 
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Nominal 
                   
                 Tool 
                 Smear 
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Hole 
                   
                 Trowel 
                 Tool 
                 Intermediate 
                 Drill 
               
               
                 Bit 
                 Diameter 
                 % 
                 Diameter  
                 Body 
                 Connector 
                 Pipe 
               
               
                 Size 
                 (NHD) 
                 (D T /NHD) 
                 (D T ) 
                 Diameter 
                 Diameter  
                 Diameter 
               
               
                   
               
               
                  4″ 
                  4″ 
                 94% 
                 3¾″ 
                 2⅜″ 
                 — 
                 2⅜″ 
               
               
                 4.5″  
                 4.5″  
                 94% 
                 4¼″ 
                 3½″ 
                 3½″ 
                 2⅜″ 
               
               
                  6″ 
                  6″ 
                 92% 
                 5½″ 
                 4½″ 
                 4½″ 
                 3½″ 
               
               
                  7″ 
                  7″ 
                 96% 
                 6¾″ 
                 6⅜″ 
                   5½″ &amp; 
                 4½″ 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 6⅜″ 
                   
               
               
                  8″ 
                  8″ 
                 94% 
                 7½″ 
                 6⅜″ 
                 6⅜″ 
                 5″ 
               
               
                  9″ 
                  9″ 
                 94% 
                 8½″ 
                 8⅜″ 
                 8⅜″ 
                 6⅜″ 
               
               
                 10″ 
                 10″ 
                 95% 
                 9½″ 
                 8⅜″ 
                 8⅜″ 
                 6⅜″ 
               
               
                 12″ 
                 12″ 
                 75% 
                  9″ 
                 8⅜″ 
                 8⅜″ 
                 6⅜″ 
               
               
                 12″ 
                 12″ 
                 83% 
                 10″ 
                 8⅜″ 
                 8⅜″ 
                 6⅜″ 
               
               
                 12″ 
                 12″ 
                 92% 
                 11″ 
                 8⅜″ 
                 8⅜″ 
                 6⅜″ 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0080]    Drilling is conducted according to a drilling plan that takes into consideration lithology, well design, modeling, and goals. When developing a drilling plan, the presence and length of smear tool may be considered and integrated into the drilling plan. The drillstring may include one or more sections of smear tool either adjacent or separated by one or more drill pipes. The presence and length of smear tool may be calculated from both the presence of unconsolidated portions of the formation, ROP, and ability of the smear tool to prevent loss in those sections. In areas where loss is a concern, additional measures may be taken, such as adding LCM, slowing the ROP to allow greater smear time, or a combination of slowing ROP and adding LCM. If loss is prevented, the use of the smear tool or smear tool in combination with LCM may reduce the need to add casing, delay the need to trip out and add casing immediately, or provide additional drilling time to reach a milestone where casing is scheduled. 
         [0081]    This process may be improved by using an eccentric smear tool that encourages contact with the wellbore as shown in  FIG. 15 . An eccentric smear tool would have a disproportional weight causing the tool to rotate off-balance and contact the wall each rotation. There is a range of eccentric tools, as shown in  FIG. 15A  a junk slot milled into the side of a solid tool would maximize the amount of smear surface  926  and force solids in the junk slot to contact the leading edge  921  and the capture surface  925 . The increased smear surface  926  would then have more contact with the wellbore leading to greater smear effect. Alternatively, as shown  FIG. 15B  a welded straight bar  920  would create a differential eccentric weight causing the leading edge  921  and capture surface  925  to deviate more from the center of the wellbore. Each may have benefits depending upon lithology, manufacturing costs, and wellbore properties. Additionally, these tools need not be used in isolation, an eccentric smear tool may be used with an concentric smear tool and/or smooth trowel surface to encourage greater contact for these tools. In one embodiment a smear tool with a single straight bar as shown in  FIG. 15A  or B may be used adjacent to a concentric smear tool as shown in  FIG. 13  or  14  to obtain the benefits of the off-center wellbore contact in conjunction with a large amount of smear surface. Additionally, the above configuration may be placed adjacent to a smooth trowel tool as shown in  FIGS. 7 through 12 , to finish smoothing the surface once all of the solid particles have been pressed into the wellbore wall. 
         [0082]    The smear tool with its unique design that reduces scraping, may be used in any well type where circulation loss may be a problem. The low cost and ease of adding a smear tool to any drillstring provides a useful tool for a variety of drilling operations. The scope of protection for this invention is not limited by the description set out above, but is only limited by the claims which follow. That scope of the invention is intended to include all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims. Each and every claim is incorporated into the specification as an embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the claims are part of the description and are a further description and are in addition to the preferred embodiments of the present invention. The discussion of any reference is not an admission that it is prior art to the present invention, especially any reference that may have a publication date after the priority date of this application.