Abstract:
An interleaver circuit architectures which utilizes the relationship between intra-row elements in a matrix, in order to simplify the MOD computations necessary in an interleaver. The interleaver calculates a subset of results, stores those results, performs operations on the stored results in order to obtain new results, then updates at least some of the old results with the new results for the next column operation. The interleaver address is then calculated row by row. By storing only a subset of the results and replacing old results with new results, the interleaver can calculate the interleaver address “on the fly” in one clock cycle with very little delay. The interleaver may also require less power and smaller substrate surface area.

Description:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION  
         [0001]    The field of the invention relates to a communication system, and more particularly, to wireless communications systems.  
         DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART  
         [0002]    The transmission of digital data is inherently prone to interference, which may introduce errors into the transmitted data. Error detection techniques have been suggested to determine as reliably as possible whether errors have been introduced into the transmitted data. For example, it is common to transmit data in packets and add to each packet a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) field, for example of a length of sixteen bits, which carries a checksum of the data of the packet. When a receiver receives the data, the receiver calculates the same checksum on the received data and verifies whether the result of the calculation is identical to the checksum in the CRC field.  
           [0003]    When the transmitted data is not used on-line, it is possible to request retransmission of erroneous data when errors are detected. However, when the transmission is performed on-line, such as, e.g., in telephone lines, cellular phones, remote video systems, etc., it is not possible to request retransmission.  
           [0004]    Convolutional codes have been introduced to allow receivers of digital data to correctly determine the transmitted data even when errors may have occurred during transmission. The convolutional codes introduce redundancy into the transmitted data and pack the transmitted data into packets in which the value of each bit is dependent on earlier bits in the sequence. Thus, when errors occur, the receiver can still deduce the original data by tracing back possible sequences in the received data.  
           [0005]    To further improve the performance of a transmission channel, some coding schemes include interleavers, which mix up the order of the bits in the packet during coding. Thus, when interference destroys some adjacent bits during transmission, the effect of the interference is spread out over the entire original packet and can more readily be overcome by the decoding process. Other improvements may include multiple-component codes that encode the packet more than once, in parallel or in series. For example, it is known in the art to employ an error correction method that uses at least two convolutional coders in parallel. Such parallel encoding is commonly referred to as turbo coding.  
           [0006]    For multiple-component codes, optimal decoding is often a very complex task, and may require large periods of time not usually available for on-line decoding. Iterative decoding techniques have been developed to overcome this problem. Rather than determining immediately whether received bits are zero or one, the receiver assigns each bit a value on a multilevel scale representative of the probability that the bit is one. A common scale, referred to as log-likelihood ratio (LLR) probabilities, represents each bit by an integer in some range, e.g., {−32,31}. A value of 31 signifies that the transmitted bit was a zero with very high probability, and a value of −32 signifies that the transmitted bit was a one, with very high probability. A value of zero indicates that the logical bit value is indeterminate.  
           [0007]    Data represented on the multilevel scale is referred to as “soft data,” and iterative decoding is usually soft-in/soft-out, i.e., the decoding process receives a sequence of inputs corresponding to probabilities for the bit values and provides as output corrected probabilities, taking into account constraints of the code. Generally, a decoder that performs iterative decoding uses soft data from former iterations to decode the soft data read by the receiver. During iterative decoding of multiple—component codes, the decoder uses results from decoding of one code to improve the decoding of the second code. When parallel encoders are used, as in turbo coding, two corresponding decoders may conveniently be used in parallel for this purpose. Such iterative decoding is carried out for a plurality of iterations until it is believed that the soft data closely represents the transmitted data. Those bits that have a probability indicating that they are closer to one (for example, between 0 and 31 on the scale described above) are assigned binary zero, and the remaining bits are assigned binary one.  
           [0008]    “Turbo coding” represents an important advancement in the area of forward error correction (FEC). There are many variants of turbo coding, but most types of turbo coding use multiple encoding steps separated by interleaving steps combined with the use of iterative decoding. This combination provides previously unavailable performance with respect to noise tolerance in a communications system. Namely, turbo coding allows communications at levels of energy-per-bit per noise power spectral density (E b /N o ) that were previously unacceptable using the existing forward error correction techniques.  
           [0009]    Many communications systems use forward error correction techniques and therefore would benefit from the use of turbo coding. For example, turbo codes could improve the performance of wireless satellite links, in which the limited downlink transmit power of the satellite necessitates receiver systems that can operate at low E b /N o  levels. Digital wireless telecommunication systems, for example, digital cellular and PCS telephone systems, also use forward error correction. For example, the Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) has promulgated the Group Radio Access Network Standard TS 25.212 V4.0.0, which defines a digital wireless communication system that uses multiplexing and channel coding.  
           [0010]    As described above, an interleaver is an important part of turbo coding and decoding. Various known references describe turbo interleaver implementations. In most contemporary solutions, the turbo interleaver is implemented using a digital signal processor (DSP) and memory lookup table to calculate and determine the proper interleaving address.  
           [0011]    In one reference, a VLSI implementation is illustrated for a turbo decoder, where the turbo interleaver is implemented as a SRAM and an EPROM containing the scrambling addresses, which must be pre-programmed by a DSP. Another reference illustrates a VLSI implementation of a turbo decoder, where the interleaver is implemented as a RAM and a ROM containing the scrambling addresses, which must be hard-coded and is very large. As described above, the traditional and popular solution for the interleaver address generation is based on a ROM or a RAM. The interleaver addresses are stored in the ROM/RAM, then read out one by one.  
           [0012]    One of the most common computations performed by a turbo interleaver is a “MOD” computation, common in residue number theory. Simple examples include 12 MOD 4=0, 12 MOD 5=2, 135 MOD 6=3, etc. Conventionally, the MOD computation is performed via division or several steps of addition, comparison, and subtraction which require more than one clock cycle to achieve, especially for large number MOD computations.  
           [0013]    MOD computations also require a large amount of computing/processing power and circuit area in order to compute the MOD value quickly. The computing/processing power required is often several cycles, which introduces an undesirable delay. In conventional implementations, which compute numbers up to MOD 33, 20.6 mm 2  of silicon area is required.  
           [0014]    In summary, conventional implementations of turbo interleavers require too much processing time in the way of DSP clock cycles, too much memory, too much power and too much surface area on a silicon chip.  
         SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
         [0015]    The present invention is directed to a turbo interleaver circuit architecture, which utilizes the relationship between intra-row elements in a matrix, in order to simplify the MOD computations necessary in an interleaver. In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the interleaver calculates a subset of results, stores those results, performs an add/compare/subtract operation between the stored results in order to obtain new results, then updates at least some of the old results with the new results for the next column operation. The interleaver address is then calculated row by row.  
           [0016]    By storing only a subset of the results and replacing old results with new results, the interleaver in one exemplary embodiment calculates the interleaver address “on the fly” in one clock cycle with very little delay. The interleaver may also require less power and smaller substrate surface area. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the interleaver performs the MOD computation utilizing only addition, comparison, and subtraction operations instead of division operations. In a more specific exemplary embodiment, the interleaver obtains a MOD computation result with only a single addition, comparison, and subtraction. As a result, the MOD calculation may be performed in one clock cycle; consequently, the interleaver address generation is produced more quickly than in conventional interleavers which implement division and/or multiplication and shift operations.  
           [0017]    The interleaver in at least one exemplary embodiment of the present invention also reduces the traditional large address memory and DSP computation load to generate the interleaver address “on the fly”.  
           [0018]    In yet another exemplary embodiment, the interleaver of the present invention, performs interleaving based on inter-row and intra-row permutations among a rectangular matrix. The number of rows are selectable from fixed numbers set by a standard (for example 5, 10, and 20 as may be defined by a standards) and the number of columns of the rectangular matrix are decided (again as may be determined by a standard) by the nearest prime number. For example, if the block length of the input data K is 44, the number of rows is set at 5, and the number of columns is set at 10, then 5×10=50 interleaving addresses will be generated from the rectangular matrix (interleaving addresses 0-49 in random order). If the number of interleaving addresses generated 50 is greater than the block length of the input data, 44, all addresses greater than or equal to 44 are invalid, and therefore not useful addresses. In the above example, addresses 44-50 are said to be “pruned”. If K=50, then no addresses are pruned.  
           [0019]    In other exemplary embodiments, the interleaver of the present invention utilizes two addition/comparison/subtraction circuits to avoid losing a clock cycle when pruning an invalid address. In at least one exemplary embodiment, the interleaver produces two addresses in every clock cycle, but only one is selected. During pruning, if a first address is found to be invalid, namely the address is greater than the block length, then the other address can be used immediately without waiting for the next clock cycle to calculate it.  
           [0020]    As a result, the interleaver of the exemplary embodiments of the present invention has an efficient structure and is applicable to mobile wireless communication systems, such as UMTS/DoCoMo data channel processing as specified in the standards documentation by 3GPP. The interleaver of the exemplary embodiments of the present invention is implemented with significantly reduced memory size and simplified construction for data interleaving address to be generated “on-the-fly”. 
       
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0021]    The present invention will be better understood from reading the following description of non-limiting embodiments, with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:  
         [0022]    [0022]FIG. 1 illustrates a hardware diagram of an interleaver in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.  
         [0023]    [0023]FIG. 2 illustrates the interleaver address generator  10  of FIG. 1 receiving auxiliary parameters from a digital signal processor (DSP).  
         [0024]    [0024]FIG. 3 illustrates the interleaver address generator  10  of FIG. 1 receiving auxiliary parameters from an all-hardware configuration.  
         [0025]    [0025]FIG. 4 illustrates the interleaver address generator of FIG. 1 equipped with additional logic for the decoder application.  
         [0026]    [0026]FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate the operating of the interleaver address generator for the logMAP decoder application of FIG. 4 in sequential and pseudo-random modes, respectively. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION  
       [0027]    An algorithm for producing an interleaved address may include several steps. An exemplary algorithm includes the steps of formatting the input data bits into a rectangular matrix, performing intra-row and inter-row permutations on the rectangular matrix, and outputting the bits from the rectangular matrix with pruning.  
         [0028]    The first step is to format the input bits into a rectangular matrix. If K is the number of input bits in the data block to encode, the number of rows R and columns C of the rectangular matrix may be determined as follows.  
         [0029]    1. Determine the number of rows R of the rectangular matrix such that:  
       R   =     {           5   ,   if             (     40   ≤   K   ≤   159     )                            10   ,   if           (       (     160   ≤   K   ≤   200     )                   or                   (     481   ≤   K   ≤   530     )       )               20   ,   if             (     K   =     any                 other                 value       )                                                
 
         [0030]    The rows of rectangular matrix are numbered 0, 1, 2, . . . , R−1 from top to bottom.  
         [0031]    2. Determine the prime number p and the number of columns C of the rectangular matrix such that:  
         [0032]    if (481≦K≦530) then p=53 and C=p.  
         [0033]    else  
         [0034]    find the minimum prime p such that (p+1)−K/R≧0, where p is the minimum prime number&gt;=(K/R)−1.  
                         
 
         [0035]    C is determined by the value of p with respect to K/R as depicted above.  
         [0036]    The columns of rectangular matrix are numbered 0, 1, 2, . . . , C−1 from left to right.  
         [0037]    3. When R and C have been determined, the input bits can be written into a R×C matrix row by row.  
         [0038]    4. Compute the intra-row and inter-row permutations within the R×C rectangular matrix.  
         [0039]    The second step is to perform intra-row and inter-row permutations on the rectangular matrix. The following algorithm may be used to compute the intra-row and inter-row permutation.  
         [0040]    (1) Select a primitive root ν (for example for Table 1, which is provided in the 3GPP Standard.)  
         [0041]    (2) Construct a base sequence s(i) for intra-row permutation as:  
         [0042]    s(i)=[ν×s(i−1)] mod p, i=1, 2, . . . , (p−2)., and s(0)=1  
         [0043]    (3) Let q 0 =1 be the first prime integer in {qj},  
         [0044]    Select the consecutive minimum prime integers {q j } (j=1, 2, . . . , R−1) such that: g.c.d{q j , p−1}=1, q j &gt;6, and q j &gt;q (jn−1) , where g.c.d. is greatest common divisor.  
         [0045]    (4) Permute sequence {q j } to get sequence {r j } such that r T(j) =q j , j=0, 1, . . . , R−1,  
         [0046]    where T(j) (j=0, 1, 2, . . . , R−1) is the inter-row permutation pattern defined as the one of the following four patterns: Pat 1  , Pat 2 , Pat 3  and Pat 4  depending on the number of input bits K.  
                             TABLE 1                       Table of prime numbers p and associated primitive roots v                                    7   3           11   2           13   2           17   3           19   2           23   5           29   2           31   3           37   2           41   6           43   3           47   5           53   2           59   2           61   2           67   2           71   7           73   5           79   3           83   2           89   3           97   5           101   2           103   5           107   2           109   6           113   3           127   3           131   2           137   3           139   2           149   2           151   6           157   5           163   2           167   5           173   2           179   2           181   2           191   19           193   5           197   2           199   3           211   2           223   3           227   2           229   6           233   3           239   7           241   7           251   6           257   3                      
 
         [0047]    [0047]         {       T        (   0   )       ,     T        (   1   )       ,     T        (   2   )       ,              …              ,     T        (     R   -   1     )         }     =     {             Pat   4         if         (     40   ≤   K   ≤   159     )               Pat   3         if           (     160   ≤   K   ≤   200     )                            Pat   1         if           (     201   ≤   K   ≤   480     )                            Pat   3         if         (     481   ≤   K   ≤   530     )               Pat   1         if         (     531   ≤   K   ≤   2280     )               Pat   2         if         (     2281   ≤   K   ≤   2480     )               Pat   1         if         (     2481   ≤   K   ≤   3160     )               Pat   2         if         (     3161   ≤   K   ≤   3210     )               Pat   1         if         (     3211   ≤   K   ≤   5114     )           ,                               
         [0048]    where Pat 1 , Pat 2 , Pat 3  and Pat 4  have the following patterns respectively.  
         [0049]    Pat 1 : {19, 9, 14, 4, 0, 2, 5, 7, 12, 18, 10, 8, 13, 17, 3, 1, 16, 6, 15, 11} 
         [0050]    Pat 2 : {19, 9, 14, 4, 0, 2, 5, 7, 12, 18, 16, 13, 17, 15, 3, 1, 6, 11, 8, 10} 
         [0051]    Pat 3 : {9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0} 
         [0052]    Pat 4 : {4, 3, 2, 1, 0} 
         [0053]    (5) Perform the j-th (j=0, 1, 2, . . . , R−1) intra-row permutation as:  
         [0054]    When C=p, U j (i)=s([i×r j ]mod(p−1)), i=0, 1, 2, . . . , (p−2)., and U j (p−1)=0, C=p,  
         [0055]    When C=p+1, U j (i)=s([i×r j ]mod(p−1)), i=0, 1, 2, . . . , (p−2)., U j (p−1)=0, and U j (p)=p,  
         [0056]    if (K=C×R) then exchange U R−1 (p) with U R−1 (0).  
         [0057]    When C=p−1, U j (i)=s([i×r j ]mod(p−1))−1, i=0, 1, 2, . . . , (p−2),  
         [0058]    The maximum-size of the permutation matrix is 20×256.  
         [0059]    (6) Perform the inter-row permutation based on the pattern T(j) (j=0, 1, 2, . . . , R−1);  
         [0060]    where T(j) is the original row position of the j-th permuted row.  
         [0061]    The output of the Turbo code internal interleaver is the bit sequence read out column by column from the intra-row and inter-row permuted R×C matrix starting with row 0 of column 0 and ending with row R−1 of column C−1. The output may be pruned by deleting bits that were not present in the input bit sequence, i.e. the number of bits output from Turbo code internal interleaver is K and the total number of pruned bits is: (R×C)−K.  
         [0062]    [0062]FIG. 1 illustrates exemplary hardware for implementing an exemplary algorithm for producing an interleaved address. The interleaver address generator  10  includes ADJLUT  12 , LUT  14 , and adder  16  as well as first storage  18  and second storage  20 . The interleaver address generator  10  also includes control logic  30 , add/compare/subtract (ACSUB) units  40  and  42 , lookup tables  44  and  46 , multipliers  48  and  50 , prune control logic  60  and adder  70 . In an exemplary embodiment, the first storage  18  and second storage  20  are each implemented as a bank of D-flip flops.  
         [0063]    Exemplary calculations performed by the interleaver address generator  10  of the present invention are as follows. In a given row, if a first column MOD result is 1*r MOD p=a, and the jth column MOD result is j*r MOD p=b, then the succeeding column (j+1)th computation is (j+1)*r MOD p=(1*r MOD p+j*r MOD p) MOD p=(a+b) MOD p. Since both a and b are less than p, (a+b) MOD p may be computed with a single adder, comparator, and subtractor. As a result, the desired result may be obtained without a large amount of computation. In the above example, a and b are defined as old results, which are stored in the first storage  18  and the second storage  20 , respectively. “a” will always be stored in the first storage  18  for all the new computations and “b” will be stored in the second storage  18  and updated whenever the succeeding new result has been calculated.  
         [0064]    The results of the MOD computations above are then used as an index of the lookup table, S(i)LUT  44  and the true intra-row permutation order is supplied from Table 2, which can be provided by a DSP or stored in a ROM.  
         [0065]    In some exemplary algorithms, the interleaving is based on inter-row and intra-row permutation among a rectangular matrix, and the numbers of row are only selectable from a fixed set (for example, 5, 10, 20, . . . ), the number of column is determined based on the nearest prime number. For example, if the block length K=44, the row assigned is 5, and column assigned is 10, then 5*10=50 interleaving address will be generated from the matrix (0,1, . . . , 49 in random order). All invalid addresses are pruned, namely those with values longer than K. In this example, only addresses 0-43 are useful addresses. If K=50, then there is no need to prune any addresses.  
         [0066]    After the MOD calculation, pruning by the prune control circuit  60  may occur. For example, in the first clock cycle, the row 1, column 1 and row 2, column 1 addresses are generated, if both are valid, the (1,1) address is selected otherwise the (2,1) address is the substitute. Then in the next clock cycle the (2,1) address and the (3,1) address are calculated if no pruning was performed in last cycle or the (3,1) address and the (4,1) address are generated if pruning occurred in last clock cycle. In the no pruning case, the (2,1) address has already been calculated in the last clock cycle, in order to save power. The prune control circuit  60  stops the computation path for the (2,1) address in the repeated calculation period.  
         [0067]    The operation of the interleaver address generator  10  is most easily described in conjunction with Table 2. For operation of the interleaver address generator  10 , a prime integer p is selected according to the length of data input to the interleaver address generator  10 . {q j } in Table 2 is defined as a sequence of minimum prime integers starting with 1 and having a maximum size (in an exemplary embodiment, the maximum size is 20 prime numbers, but the interleaving structure may be flexible to support different maxima) which is essential to construct a set of column 1 values (shown as column 5 in Table 1). The subsequent columns&#39; values are generated by the previous column value and column 1&#39;s value. The value of {q j } may be selected from the set {1, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 89} sequentially on condition that g.c.d{q j , p−1}=1. The Δq j LUT  14  stores the difference sequence {q i −q j−1 }, the values in column 3 of Table 2, instead of {q j } in order to reduce the storage area and calculate the value for the first column in a simple way. ADJLUT  12  adjusts the output value from Δq j LUT  14  if there is any skipping of prime numbers in the {q j } sequence.  
         [0068]    With regard to the recursive calculations performed in Table 2, {m ij } represent the ([i*q j ]mod(p−1)) element in the matrix. Column 0 is all 0s (i=0). Each column 1 modulo result can be obtained from its preceding row modulo value and the corresponding Δq j . The subsequent columns&#39; modulo results are calculated from the column 1 value and the respective preceding column&#39;s results as follows:  
         [0069]    i=1:  
         [0070]    m 1j =q j mod(p−1)=(m 1j−1 +Δq j )mod(p−1), where mod(p−1) is calculated as follows:  
         [0071]    if (m 1j−1 +Δq j )&gt;=(p−1) then  
           m   1j =( m   1j−1   +Δq   j )−( p− 1); 
         [0072]    else  
           m   1j =( m   1j−1   +Δq   j ); 
         [0073]    end if;  
         [0074]    i&gt;1:  
               m     i   ,   j       =       i   *     q   j          mod        (     p   -   1     )         =       (       q   j     +       (     i   -   1     )     *     q   j         )          mod   (     p   -   1     )                     =       [         q   j          mod        (     p   -   1     )         +       (     i   -   1     )     *     q   j          mod        (     p   -   1     )           ]          mod        (     p   -   1     )                       =       (       m     1   ,   j       +     m       i   -   1     ,   j         )          mod        (     p   -   1     )           ,     where                   mod        (     p   -   1     )                     is                 calcuated                 as                   follows   :                                   
 
         [0075]    if (m 1j +m i−1j )&gt;=(p−1) then  
           m   ij =( m   1j   +m   i−1j )−( p− 1); 
         [0076]    else  
           m   ij =( m   1j   +m   i−1j ); 
         [0077]    end if;  
                                                                   TABKE 2                           Values Input To and Calculated By Interleaver Address Generator 10                        0 * q j                             mod       J   q j     Δq j     (p − 1)   1 * q j mod(p − 1)   i * q j mod(p − 1)                                                0 1 2 3 4    1  7 11 13 17   1 6 4 + Δ2 + Δ4 + Δ   0 0 0 0 0                     m     1   ,   0       =         q   0          mod        (     p   -   1     )         =   1                   m     1   ,   j       =     {             m     1   ,     j   -   1         +     Δq   j                     m     1   ,     j   -   1         +     Δq   j     -     (     p   -   1     )       ,     if   &gt;     (     p   -   1     )                               j   =   1     ,   …              ,     R   -   1                                                               m     i   ,   j       =     {             m       i   -   1     ,   j       +     m     1   ,   j                       m       i   -   1     ,   j       +       m     1   ,       j     -     (     p   -   1     )       ,     if   &gt;     (     p   -   1     )                               j   =   0     ,       …                 R     -   1                                                             . . .   . . .   . . .   . . .       R − 2   73   2   0       R − 1   79   6   0       R   83   4   0       R + 1   89   6   0                  
 
         [0078]    The first storage  18  is used to store the column 1 values and the second storage  20  is used to store the most recent column values. The second storage  20  is updated at every cycle with the new matrix value. ACSUB unit  40  is the add-compare-subtract to calculate the new matrix value. Two ACSUB units  40 , 42  and two ports for the first and second storage units are employed to handle the pruning of invalid addresses without introducing a clock cycle delay. Control logic  30  generates the address signal and write enable signals we — 1 and we_p, etc for the ADJLUT  12 , Δq j LUT  14 , and the first and second storages  18 , 20 . The control logic  30  also generates enable and control signals to organize the operation of the ACSUB units  40 , 42 . In the pruning cycle, both ACSUB units  40 , 42  are turned on to calculate two interleaver addresses simultaneously, otherwise both ACSUB units  40 , 42  are active alternatively to provide one effective value in every clock cycle. In this manner, ACSUB units  40 , 42  do not need to repeat any unnecessary calculations, so half of the power for the add, comparison and subtraction can be saved. T(j) LUT circuit  46  is the look up table for the row permutation of the matrix, which is used to generate the respective position of the interleaving after multiplication with the column number of the input data. S(i) LUT circuit  44  is the intra-row permutation sequence that may be downloaded for each code block from a DSP or another micro-controller, or in the alternative, hard-wired into ROM. Each of these options is further discussed below. The matrix value is the input to the S(i) LUT  44  as the index of the look up table and the outputs of the S(i) LUT  44  are part of the final interleaving. S(i) LUT  44  may be implemented with a double port RAM and double multipliers designed to produce two outputs per clock cycle. Both outputs go through the prune control circuit  60  to provide one interleaving address per clock cycle.  
         [0079]    In order to perform the operations described above, the following input parameters are required to be downloaded: K(block length), prime — 1(Prime number minus one), Prune_Value (the number of value needed to be pruned), Col C(the number of columns), Row R (the number of rows) and an SI table. These input parameters may be provided from several sources.  
         [0080]    A first source for the input parameters is a DSP  80 , as illustrated in FIG. 2. A second source is an all-hardware solution. In this case, as illustrated in FIG. 3, all the possible prime numbers (P — 1) and SI are stored in a ROM for block lengths from 40 to 5114. The Row R, Col C, and Prune_value can be calculated according to the P — 1 looked up from the ROM table. The P — 1 &amp; SI base address ROM may be 1092 bits, and the SI ROM may be 6128*8 bits. Since s(0) is always 1, the SI ROM size can be further reduced to (6128−52)*8 bits. With the all-hardware generation for the auxiliary parameters, the SI LUT  44  employed in the interleaver address generator  10  can be omitted if there is already a SI ROM outside the interleaver address generator  10 .  
         [0081]    The interleaver address generator  10  may be used in a sliding window decoder  100  where the sliding window decoder  100  partitions the block into one or more windows. As illustrated in FIG. 4, the sliding window decoder  100  may also include a memory control unit  102  for controlling the generation of interleaved and sequential addresses and a MUX  104  for sending one or both to an extrinsic memory  110 . With a two phase windowed logMAP decoder, the sliding window decoder  100  can simultaneously fetch two blocks from the extrinsic memory  110  in order to calculate a forward recursion on the window and a dummy backward recursion from the end of the next window to the end of the current window. In the second phase, the logMAP decoder calculates the backward recursion for the current window. An efficient method of generating turbo interleaver addresses for a new window period of the sliding window decoder  100  is to calculate them in the current window period phase two, and then store the addresses in a cache memory for use in the next window period. TIWINA and TIWINB, shown in FIG. 4, are “turbo interleaver windows memories A and B”, and are used store windows of addresses. FIG. 5A and FIG. 5B show how the address windows can be updated and used in a particular two-phase logMAP algorithm for decoder  100 . The decoder operates in sequential order and pseudo-random order alternately. FIG. 5A shows the decoder  100  operating in sequential access mode, and FIG. 5B shows the decoder  100  operating in pseudo-random access mode that uses the interleaved addresses. In phase one, windows w 0  and w 1  are accessed to calculate alphas and dummy betas, and in phase two the window w 1  is accessed in a reverse order to calculate true betas. The window may then be slid forward to the end of the block, as showed in FIGS. 5A and 5B. When in sequential order, TIWINA and TIWINB are equipped with the first two windows&#39; interleaver addresses in order to address windows w 0  and w 1  at the very start of the phase one calculation during decoder&#39;s pseudo-random access mode. In each current window period, the addresses for w 1  remain and used for the next window period to address w 0 , and the memory storing the addresses for w 0  are updated during phase two for next window period to address w 1 . As a result, TIWINA and TIWINB are accessed in forward order and reverse order alternately to provide the addresses for w 0  and w 1  due to the properties of the sliding window logMAP decoder, as illustrated in FIG. 5B.  
         [0082]    As described above, the interleaver of the exemplary embodiments of the present invention reduces the number of MOD calculations necessary by utilizing old results efficiently. The interleaver of the exemplary embodiments of the present invention uses two storage areas  18 ,  20 , one to store the first column of m 1j  results and the other to store the latest column of m i,j  results, where m i,j  is the result of ACSUB units  40 ,  42 . The results from the two ACSUB units  40 , 42  are stored into the j and j+1 row of the storage area  20 , wheras m 1j  is stored in the storage  18 . j may vary from 0 to 20, increases by 1 every clock cycle. In the interleaver of the exemplary embodiments of the present invention, all a DSP is needed for is to provide the S(i) sequence. If the overall encoder/decoder architecture does not include a DSP, the all-hardware solution described above may be used to calculate the S(i), Col C, Row R, and Prune_value parameters.  
         [0083]    It is further noted, that although the present invention has been described in the context of calculating two columns using two ACSUB units, embodiments using any other number of columns less than the total number of columns are also considered to be within the scope of the present application.  
         [0084]    It is further noted than a DSP is capable of performing the MOD calculation, so another option, with the scope of the present invention is to implement the interleaver algorithm via DSP firmware and download the results into a memory for hardware to use and access.  
         [0085]    While the particular invention has been described with reference to illustrative embodiments, this description is not meant to be construed in a limiting sense. It is understood that although the present invention has been described, various modifications of the illustrative embodiments, as well as additional embodiments of the invention, will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon reference to this description without departing from the spirit of the invention, as recited in the claims appended hereto. Those skilled in the art will readily recognize that these and various other modifications, arrangements and methods can be made to the present invention without strictly following the exemplary applications illustrated and described herein and without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. It is therefore contemplated that the appended claims will cover any such modifications or embodiments as fall within the true scope of the invention.