Abstract:
In telecommunication systems, for instance of the type DECT, there are mobile units which move within and between the cells of the system. The new device identifies mobile units which move with a predetermined speed and the identification is performed by means of fading measurements.

Description:
TECHNICAL FIELD 
     The present invention relates to a device at telecommunication system, for instance DECT which comprises mobile units which are moving within or between the cells of the system. 
     STATE OF THE TECHNOLOGY 
     It is in itself known to perform determinations of speed based on the Doppler effect or on a longer time of measuring of the passage of the mobile through several cells. The Doppler effect is proportional to the quotient speed of vehicle/speed of light, which at the speed of 10 ms would imply a doppler shift of 60 Hz, which is quite negligible compared with bandwidth, operating frequency and normal frequency change caused by for instance heat release in the equipment. Measuring of the passage of the mobile through several cells is a blunt instrument if there is no indication whether the portable passes the cell diametrically or peripherally. Even a comparatively slow portable can peripherally pass many cells rapidly. The method also assumes that connection is established and is by that not good to use to deny connection. 
     DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     Technical Problem 
     DECT (Digital European Cordless Telecommunications) is a pronounced small cell system, with typical cell radius of 100-500 meters at mobile applications i open environment. A user who is travelling &#34;rapidly&#34; through a region which is covered by several linked up DECT-cells will therefore cause many handovers (shifting of existing call from one cell to another; there are both intercell handovers and intracell handovers; it is the former which is related to here). If the number of intercell handovers becomes very large, this will load down the underlying network and cause increased signalling (to the central unit existing behind, and/or to VLR, etc). 
     Even if high handover frequency is accepted, problems remain with keeping a high transmission quality at higher speeds. The problem is caused by the fact that the gain with antenna diversity is reduced at higher speeds for DECT, because diversity algorithms where only one unit has antenna diversity must perform some form of prediction with speed depending validity--at higher speeds the mobile gets time to travel as far during a time frame that the level of the Rayleigh fading will get time to change several dB. This means that one for higher speeds either must increase the fading margin, which implies a reduced cell size, or resort to coding and/or interleaving as for instance for GSM. 
     For this reason all public operators of DECT have an interest in sorting out those DECT portables which are moving &#34;too rapidly&#34; for making it possible/profitable to deal with the calls. 
     For an operator who operates both mobile networks and DECT-networks it is even more interesting to be able to distinguish those portables which are moving &#34;too rapidly&#34;. If dual-mode hand units (for instance DECT+GSM) are used, the operator has a very great interest in that rapid portables are using the mobile telephone system, so that motorized mobiles which are moving rapidly do not &#34;flow over&#34; to DECT. The operator will of course see to it that each network is used optimally, and also that the combination of these becomes optimal. 
     In this connection it can be worth explaining what is meant by &#34;rapid movement&#34;. Tests have shown that DECT-systems manage dealing with portables which are moving with speeds up to 70 km/h (in these tests there were probably not time to reach higher vehicle speeds within a DECT-covered area). It is reasonable to assume that the tests were performed so that the portable passed on the whole diametrically through the cells, in order to cause as few handovers as possible. With the assumption that the cell passages on the average are considerably more peripheral, it is reasonable to use speed limits in the range 20-40 km/h (i.e. about 10 m/s; 5-10 times walking speed). The operator shall of course have possibility to decide which limit that should be used. 
     As a conclusion the technical problem is that DECT-portables which are moving &#34;too rapidly&#34; causes a too high handover frequency with a &#34;too large&#34; background signalling and also risk worse transmission quality alternatively more expensive cell structure. Dual-mode hand units should also be possible to be routed into the network which best can deal with its traffic. 
     The Solution 
     What primarily can be regarded as characteristic for a device according to the invention will be evident from the characteristic parts of the following patent claims. 
     Advantages 
     By what has ben suggested above a practically applicable device can be arranged. So have for instance measurements with 2000 samples per second been performed, which correspond to 1 DECT time-slot per sample in different milieus for different speeds. The preliminary evaluations of the measurements verify the usefulness of the invention in these contexts. The invention can be used for sorting out DECT portables which are moving with too high speed for making it interesting or profitable for the operator to establish connections with the portables. The invention is probably of greatest interest for public operators, but also operators of private networks might have the same interest. Beside mentioned field of application, the invention can be used in all types of small cells, and also in mobile telephone systems, for instance for a coarse sorting. 
    
    
     LIST OF FIGURES 
     One at present suggested embodiment of a device which shows the significant characteristics of the invention will be described below, while at the same time is referred to enclosed drawings, where 
     FIG. 1 shows a description of the invention in the form of a flow chart. 
     FIG. 2 is a system-level diagram showing a mobile unit and a communication network that includes a large cell, such as that used with GSM, and a small cell, such as that used with DECT. 
    
    
     DETAILED EXAMPLE OF EMBODIMENT 
     The invention is based on the fact that the speed of the mobile is decided by means of fading measurements. Fading is made up of variations in the signal strength i time or space due to interference between different propagation paths and (varying) shadowing. A receiver always experiences a certain fading due to the fact that the surrounding is moving, for instance cars, people, swaying trees etc. The objects can act as reflectors. In other words they need not shadow the direct ray to have an influence. This type of background fading shows a big variation concerning periodicity and amplitude. Normally in suburban and urban surroundings the background fading has a rapid component with a small amplitude, and one very slow with varying amplitude. 
     When the receiver is moving, it furthermore experiences two types of fading: 
     1) Rapid fading which is Rayleigh-distributed. This implies among other things that the average distance between two signal strength minima is a half wavelenght. Rayleigh-fading has a very big amplitude variation. 
     2) Slow fading which is lognormal-distributed. 
     The fading measurements can be performed according to the following: 
     Mobile- or base unit performs signal strength measurements. These measurements are performed with a defined measurement pace (sample frequency). 
     The signal strength values are averaged over a &#34;short&#34; time. For DECT about 100 ms is suitable. The short time average (KMED) represents this average. 
     The signal strength values are averaged over a &#34;long&#34; time. For DECT about 1 s is suitable. The long time average (LMED) represents this average. 
     The fading determination can, according to the invention, also be performed as below: 
     The fading (FH), which constitutes the basis for the speed determination, consists of the difference between short time average and long time average: FH=KMED--IMED. 
     The speed determination according to the invention is performed as follows: 
     The distance between two consecutive passages for the fading of a certain limit value (GV) shall be calculated. The passages shall have the same symbol. The distance is designated SGV. 
     GV is a constant which is chosen optimally with regard to vawe lenght and speed interval. GV can for DECT for instance be chosen to -2 dB. 
     GVP is a constant which is chosen optimally with regard to GV. GVP can be said to express a reference distance for SGV. 
     The speed is calculated according to: 
     Speed=Sample rate*GVP/SGV. 
     There are several reasons for using the short time average instead of a momentary signal strength value. 
     In this way errors due to sparse sampling relatively the structure of the fading at moderate and high speeds are eliminated. Example: For a DECT-portable is obtained a measurement value per frame, i.e. 100 measurement values per second. At 10 m/s this corresponds to a distance of 10 cm between each measurement value. This can be compared with the average distance between two minima at Rayleigh-fading which is a half vawelenght, i.e. about 8 cm. Accordingly it will be difficult to characterize the Rayleigh-fading. 
     The influence from frequency jumps is reduced. With the short time average a comparatively frequency independent fading will be used for the speed determination. 
     the influence from time slot jumps will be reduced, as will the influence of antenna micro diversity, if any. On the whole the influence of background fading is eliminated. 
     FIG. 2 shows a mobile network that includes a base station 1, that provides a coverage area 3, which is a &#34;large cell&#34;. An example of such a mobile network is a GSM system. A DECT, an example of a small cell network, transmitters 5 and 6 provide smaller cell coverage areas, microcells 7, as shown. A mobile unit 9 moves between cells 3 and 7 and communicates with the respective transmitters 1, 5 and 6. 
     The invention is not restricted to the above as example shown embodiment, but may be subject to modifications within the frame of the following patent claims and idea of invention.