Abstract:
A method of displaying information for learning purposes comprises the steps of providing within a computer an information set. The information set includes a plurality of discrete information element pairs. Each discrete information element pair has a cue element and a response element. Each cue and response element pair is sequenced over a plurality of simulated flashcards. The information set is caused to be arranged for display within the computer in a deliberate sequence.

Description:
REFERENCES CITED [REFERENCED BY] 
       [0001]      
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
           
               
                   
               
               
                 U.S. Patn. Documents 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 3638196 
                 January 1972 
                 Nishiyama et al. 
               
               
                 4194301 
                 March 1980 
                 Caldwell 
               
               
                 4439161 
                 March 1984 
                 Wiggins et al. 
               
               
                 4447213 
                 May 1984 
                 Culley 
               
               
                 4509137 
                 April 1985 
                 Yoshida 
               
               
                 4637797 
                 January 1987 
                 Whitney et al. 
               
               
                 4802103 
                 January 1989 
                 Faggin et al. 
               
               
                 4921427 
                 May 1990 
                 Dunn 
               
               
                 4946391 
                 August 1990 
                 Hawkins et al. 
               
               
                 5010495 
                 April 1991 
                 Willets 
               
               
                 5161977 
                 November 1992 
                 Thomas, Jr. 
               
               
                 5261823 
                 November 1993 
                 Kurokawa 
               
               
                 5267865 
                 December 1993 
                 Lee et al. 
               
               
                 5295228 
                 March 1994 
                 Koda et al. 
               
               
                 5316485 
                 May 1994 
                 Hirose 
               
               
                 5437553 
                 August 1995 
                 Collins et al. 
               
               
                 5442782 
                 August 1995 
                 Malatesta et al. 
               
               
                 5486111 
                 January 1996 
                 Watckins 
               
               
                 5494444 
                 February 1996 
                 Thayer et al. 
               
               
                 5503560 
                 April 1996 
                 Stentiford 
               
               
                 5545044 
                 August 1996 
                 Collins et al. 
               
               
                 5555439 
                 September 1996 
                 Higashino et al. 
               
               
                 5577919 
                 November 1996 
                 Collins et al. 
               
               
                 5597312 
                 January 1997 
                 Bloom et al. 
               
               
                 5627945 
                 May 1997 
                 Cohen 
               
               
                 5675710 
                 October 1997 
                 Lewis 
               
               
                 5727951 
                 March 1998 
                 Ho et al. 
               
               
                 5779486 
                 July 1998 
                 Ho et al. 
               
               
                 5797753 
                 August 1998 
                 Griswold et al. 
               
               
                 5797754 
                 August 1998 
                 Griswold et al. 
               
               
                 5836771 
                 November 1998 
                 Ho et al. 
               
               
                 5863208 
                 January 1999 
                 Ho et al. 
               
               
                 5870731 
                 February 1999 
                 Trif et al. 
               
               
                 5885087 
                 March 1999 
                 Thomas 
               
               
                 5890911 
                 April 1999 
                 Griswold et al. 
               
               
                 5934910 
                 August 1999 
                 Ho et al. 
               
               
                 5957699 
                 September 1999 
                 Peterson et al. 
               
               
                 5967793 
                 October 1999 
                 Ho et al. 
               
               
                 5987443 
                 November 1999 
                 Nichols et al. 
               
               
                 6003021 
                 December 1999 
                 Zadik et al. 
               
               
                 6022221 
                 February 2000 
                 Boon 
               
               
                 6039575 
                 March 2000 
                 L&#39;Allier et al. 
               
               
                 6077085 
                 June 2000 
                 Parry et al. 
               
               
                 6086382 
                 July 2000 
                 Thomas 
               
               
                 6120300 
                 September 2000 
                 Ho et al. 
               
               
                 6206700 
                 March 2001 
                 Brown et al. 
               
               
                 6216869 
                 April 2001 
                 Zhang 
               
               
                 6306086 
                 October 2001 
                 Buscke 
               
               
                 6588756 
                 July 2003 
                 Hughes 
               
               
                 6606479 
                 August 2003 
                 Cook et al. 
               
               
                 6652283 
                 November 2003 
                 Van Schaack 
               
               
                 6685482 
                 February 2004 
                 Hopp et al. 
               
               
                 6884076 
                 April 2005 
                 Clark et al. 
               
               
                 6964608 
                 November 2005 
                 Koza 
               
               
                 7013242 
                 March 2006 
                 Gilmartin et al. 
               
               
                 7011525 
                 March 2006 
                 Mejia 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     
    
     FIELD OF THE INVENTION  
       [0002]    The disclosed invention is to a method of simulating a plurality of flashcards in order to enhance learning. More particularly, the disclosed invention is directed to a computer system which displays flashcards in a sequence to encourage learning, where each flashcard has a cue element and an unrelated response element. With a plurality of flashcards the standard cues and responses are distributed over more than one flashcard. 
       BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
       [0003]    Most educational institutions require that the student demonstrate recollection of specific items of information or categories of information. A test or examination is one well-known means by which a teacher establishes whether a student has grasped the information which was communicated during a particular course, seminar, workshop, or the like. Not only must the student establish that categories of information have been learned, but it is also frequently necessary for the student to establish that particular items of information within that category have been learned or memorized. A student may be called upon to demonstrate this recollection on more than one occasion, so there is frequently a need for the student to be able to demonstrate recollection of items of information which were “learned” at some point in the past. 
         [0004]    Mnemonics is the art of improving or developing the memory, and incorporates a number of tools utilized by students for assuring that information not only is learned but remains learned. One tool of mnemonics is the use of flashcards, either prepared by the student or otherwise produced. A flashcard may have any shape, size, or material of construction, but generally is a relatively small, flat, two-sided piece of stiff paper. A 3.times.5 index card is one well-known format for a flashcard, and because it is blank it permits the student to select the information which is to be learned. The flashcard typically has a first or “cue” side on which a question or item of interest is written, printed, or the like, and a second or “response” side on which the answer is placed. 
         [0005]    In a well known prior art method, a paired-associate learning method is embodied in a group of flashcards which may be presented manually or electronically via a computer, for example. In a typical example of such a method, a student starts by separating flashcards into two groups: known and unknown. The student studies each unknown flashcard by first viewing the question on one side of the flashcard and then formulating a response to the question. The student then turns the card over and views the answer provided. The student judges the adequacy of his response by comparing his answer to the correct answer. If the student believes he has learned or “knows” the paired-associate, that flashcard is placed in the group of known items. When the student has studied all of the flashcards in the first unknown group, and all of the flashcards have been transferred to the group of known flashcards, the student may review the group of known items in the same manner as described above. In an alternative method, the cards can be shuffled for learning. Thus, in this method, the learning and review is performed by a student simply looking at flashcards to determine correct responses and reviewing the flashcards as desired, with no fixed schedule or sequence. 
         [0006]    In another method invented by B. F. Skinner, a method of learning and reviewing is provided. More specifically, Skinner discloses a machine which presents a number of paired-associate questions and answers. The learning machine has an area for providing questions, and an area where the user writes in an answer to these questions. At the time the question is presented, the correct answer is not visible. A student reads a question and then writes in an answer in the area provided. The user turns a handle which causes a clear plastic shield to cover his answer while revealing the correct answer. The user judges the adequacy of his response. If the user judges that his answer is adequate, he slides a lever which punches a hole in the question and answer sheet and turns a handle revealing the next question. If the answer is judged to be inadequate, the user simply turns a handle revealing the next question. After all of the questions have been answered a first time, the user can make a second pass through the questions and answers. The machine operates such that only the questions which were answered incorrectly in the first pass are viewable during the second pass so as to provide a review of questions which were answered incorrectly. Thus, this conventional method provides a crude method of enabling review of missed questions. 
         [0007]    A slightly more advanced method was invented by Sebastian Leitner and described in “So Lernt Man Lernen.” The method involves studying flashcards as in the method described above, but in addition, involves using a specially constructed box to calculate review schedules. More specifically, the box has five compartments increasing in depth from the first compartment to the fifth compartment. According to Leitner&#39;s method, a student takes enough “unknown” flashcards to fill the first compartment and places them in the first compartment. The student begins by taking the first card out of the box and reading the question. The student then constructs an answer and compares it to the correct answer on the back of the card. If the student is connect, the student places the flashcard in the second compartment. If the student cannot construct an answer, or if the student&#39;s answer is incorrect, the student places the flashcard at the back of the group of cards in the first compartment. This process continues until all of the cards have been moved to the second compartment and the student stops the learning session. The next learning session begins by placing new “unknown” cards into the first compartment. The process of studying and sorting is performed as described above until once again, no cards remain in the first compartment. At some future date, the second compartment will be full of cards placed there during previous learning sessions. At that time, the student begins to study the cards in the second compartment, except this time, known cards are placed into the third compartment and unknown cards are placed backed into the first compartment. New cards are continually introduced into the first compartment and are moved through the compartments as they are learned and reviewed Cards that are easily remembered or known are moved from the more shallow compartments to the deeper compartments and therefore are reviewed less and less frequently. Cards that are more difficult to learn are put back into the more shallow compartments for more frequent review. This method provides a crude form of scheduled review of learned items based on item difficulty. 
         [0008]    A computer-based version of Leitner&#39;s method is provided in the German language computer software program entitled Lernkartei PC 7.0 and in the Spanish language computer software entitled ALICE (Automatic Learning In a Computerized Environment) 1.0. With ALICE 1.0, question and answer units are presented to a user and the number of cards and interval of time between study sessions are distributed to adapt to a user&#39;s work habits. 
         [0009]    Other conventional methods have recognized the importance of developing a system to present items for review. For example, a computer program developed by Piotr Wozniak in Poland and referred to as “SuperMemo” uses a mathematical model of the decline of memory traces to determine spacing of repetitions to maintain long term retention of paired-associates. 
         [0010]    In another prior art method described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,545,044, 5,437,553 and 5,577,919 issued to Collins et al., paired-associates are presented to a user for learning. However, unlike the conventional methods described above, in this invention, the user is first queried as to whether a particular item is perceived to be known or unknown, not whether the user actually knows the item, or knows the correct answer to a question. That is, a user is asked to determine whether they think they know the correct response to the cue, not what the correct response actually is. Then, a sequence of perceived known items and perceived unknown items is generated and presented to the user in the form of cue and response for learning. Similar to the first conventional method described above, the question of the perceived known or unknown items is presented to a user, the user constructs a response to the presented cue and then compares the constructed response to the correct response. 
         [0011]    In another prior art method described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,652,283 issued to Van Schaak et al., an entire learning, retaining and retrieving knowledge is presented to enhance learning. However, like the conventional methods, this method provides typical simulated flashcards with a cue element and a related response element. This patent does discuss sequences of typical cue/response flashcards to enhance learning, by removing those flashcards that are learned and adapting the sequence while using the Learn and Review Modules. The Modules are changed based on a user&#39;s past performance within one or more of the three modules. This method intentionally changes the sequence during learning. 
         [0012]    Current flashcard applications provide the user with the means to enter data in a table with two or more columns, where each table row represents various pieces of information related to a single item. For example, a row might contain a word, its translation into French, and the definition of the word in French. These applications generate one or more types of quizzes based on two of the columns in the table. Correct answers are determined from the table. One such system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,494,444. The ability to generate quizzes from data represented in a table is very useful, but does not address the need to generate quizzes for learning materials represented in a sequence. 
         [0013]    The prior art methods described above have generally proven to be only marginally effective for learning, retaining and retrieving knowledge. It can be seen from the above that there is a need for entertaining computer software which encourages learning. That by permitting an instructor or teacher to enter flashcard paired associate items in a particular sequence; can enhance learning. The disclosed invention meets these needs and overcomes the noted disadvantages through use of computer software. 
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
       [0014]    The principal object of the disclosed invention is a method of displaying information in the form of multiple simulated flashcards where the flashcards are in a sequence, with a cue element of the discrete information element pair on one flashcard and the related response element of the discrete information element pair on a second flashcard, for learning purposes or for entertainment for example by way of trivia. 
         [0015]    A method of displaying information for learning purposes according to the invention comprises the steps of providing within a computer an information set. The first information set includes a plurality of discrete information element pairs. Each discrete information element pair is defined as a ‘cue’ element and an associated ‘response’ element. All of the discrete information element pairs in the information set are caused to be arranged for display within the computer in a pre-determined sequence. The predetermined sequence may be random where the order is not important as in multiplication tables; or the predetermined sequence may be organized in an order that follows a beginning, middle and end, such as a book, or a video. The discrete information element pairs are then displayed with a display operably associated with the computer in the specified sequence. 
         [0016]    A method of using simulated flashcards, according to the invention, comprises the steps of inputting into a computer a plurality of information element pairs simulating a set of flashcards. Each simulated flashcard has a cue element and a response element, however in this method of learning the discrete information element pairs are not on the same flashcard. The simulated flashcards are arranged within the computer based upon a predetermined sequence. All information element pairs in a set or a pre-selected portion of the information element pairs of the simulated flashcards are then displayed with a display operably associated with the computer in the sequence. 
         [0017]    Unlike other simulated flashcard systems, this method of learning displays the cue element to the user on one flashcard and requires the user to select the appropriate response element from another flashcard. This then employs all flashcards in the information set in a sequence in order to complete the set. Upon selecting the correct response to the associated cue, the response element of the selected flashcard reveals a new cue element and the former response element is hidden. In kind the first cue element is hidden and reveals what will be the final response element of the sequence. 
         [0018]    These and other objects and advantages of the invention will be readily apparent in view of the following description and drawings of the above-described invention. 
     
    
     
       DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
         [0019]    The above and other objects and advantages and novel features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the invention illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein: 
           [0020]      FIG. 1  is a schematic view of a computer system according to the invention; 
           [0021]      FIG. 2  is an elevational view of another computer screen when the simulated flashcards of the invention are being reviewed; 
           [0022]      FIG. 3  is an elevational view of another computer screen when the simulated flashcards of the invention are being executed after  FIG. 2 ; 
           [0023]      FIG. 4  is an elevational view of another computer screen when the simulated flashcards of the invention are being executed after  FIG. 3 ; 
           [0024]      FIG. 5  is an elevational view of another computer screen when the simulated flashcards of the invention are being executed after  FIG. 4 ; 
           [0025]      FIG. 6  is a flow chart of the high level commands of the invention; 
           [0026]      FIG. 7  is a flow chart expanding upon a portion of the flow chart of  FIG. 6 ; 
           [0027]    FIG. BubbaBrainWorkingModel1 is a snapshot on the world wide web, of the current functioning software and its home page. 
           [0028]    FIG. BubbaBrainWorkingModel2TimesTbl is a snapshot on the world wide web, of the current functioning software and its example of a Math two times tables. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION  
       [0029]    Personal computer system PC, as best shown in  FIG. 1 , includes a personal computer  10 , an operably associated CRT display or monitor  14 , and an operably associated keyboard  16 . Keyboard  16  may be integral with computer  10 , or may be connected thereto through cord  18 . Keyboard  16  preferably has a “mouse” integral therewith for use in implementing the invention. Alternatively, a mouse  20  may be provided, and which is connected to computer  10  by cord  22 . Personal computer  10  preferably has an enhanced graphics interface, such as through use of the Windows system. 
         [0030]    Flashcards are usually created in information “sets”, with each set containing no particular number of flashcards. Thus, a set of flashcards on the general topic “multiplication” would have a number of topics within that set or category. One topic, for example, could be “the two times tables”, with other topics being “the three times tables”, “the four times tables”, or any other subcategory of information which are desired. 
         [0031]    Each set of flashcards has a minimum of 2 cards with no maximum number of cards in the set. There is no maximum number of information topics or sets. In addition, any number of sets may be open at the same time. Any number of users can be logged into the web site or program at any one time. 
         [0032]      FIG. 2  discloses a computer screen displayed on monitor  14  when the invention is in the execution mode. Cue element  3  represents one “side” of a flashcard with response elements  2 ,  4 ,  5 , and  6  representing the opposite “side” of each of the four flashcards. All response elements are displayed. The user needs to find the response which solves or best solves the displayed cue element  3 , and the user will need to follow the sequence that the flashcards have been initialized too. In this case the flashcard  7  is the correct choice for the user to select. When the user uses mouse  20  to select response element  4  because 2×8 =16, cue element  3  will disappear and a new cue element will replace response element  4 . Upon making the first selection the timer will begin to record the amount of time it takes the user to complete the entire sequence of cues and responses. When the user uses mouse  20  to select each response these selections will be counted and called “clicks”, correct clicks and incorrect clicks will be counted until the entire sequence is complete. Other statistical data will be kept as well, like the hardest cue and response element pair based on all sequences engaged. If the user selected either of the other response cues, an error would be prompted to the user to notify the user that an incorrect selection had been chosen. 
         [0033]      FIG. 3  discloses a computer screen displayed on monitor  14  when the invention is in the execution mode, this is a continuation of  FIG. 2 . Cue element  10  represents the back of the flashcard and is the cue to be solved; the user needs to find the response cue that best solves cue element  10 . When the user uses mouse  20  to select response element  6  because 4×2 =8, cue element  10  will disappear and a new cue element will replace response element  6 . 
         [0034]      FIG. 4  discloses a computer screen displayed on monitor  14  when the invention is in the execution mode, this is a continuation of  FIG. 3 . Cue element  11  represents the back of the flashcard and is the cue to be solved; the user needs to find the response cue that best solves cue element  11 . When the user uses mouse  20  to select response element  5  because 3×7 =21, cue element  11  will disappear and a new cue element will replace response element  5 . 
         [0035]      FIG. 5  discloses a computer screen displayed on monitor  14  when the invention is in the execution mode, this is a continuation of  FIG. 4 . Cue element  12  represents the back of the flashcard and is the cue to be solved; the user needs to find the response cue that best solves cue element  12 . When the user uses mouse  20  to select response element  2  because 5×6 =30, cue element  12  will disappear, the clock will stop because the user completed the entire sequence. The click counter will have increased one more time and the results of the amount of time to complete the sequence, the number of correct and incorrect clicks will all be displayed to the user in some way. 
         [0036]    Upon the program being launched at  61  as best shown in  FIG. 6 , the user selects the information topic to be learned. Then at  62  the computer display  14  shows one cue and all the responses. The user chooses the matching response to the cue from  62 , in  63 . The clock starts in  64  and the number of clicks is incremented by one in  65 . If the user selected with mouse  20  the correct response to the cue in  62 , the correct answer from  66  will then determine if the correct response is the last response in the sequence in  68 . If the response is not the last response then the program returns to  63  to check the next cue in the sequence. If the response to the cue in  65  is the incorrect response then  67  displays a box to the user to indicate that the user has an invalid entry and then returns to  63  to try another entry. If the response is correct in  66  and it is the last response in the sequence  68  then the user has completed the sequence correctly and the clock stops in  69  and the counters for invalid number of clicks and valid clicks are shown to the user in some type of window in the computer. The user then has the option in  70  to do another information set and sequence or repeat this learning sequence. 
         [0037]    Should it be determined that the execution of the program should be re-initialized, the user can select with the mouse  20  the refresh button on the display  14  which will start the program from the beginning. Data will be stored for the user, to keep his data current and to show statistically how the users are performing on all information sets. 
         [0038]      FIG. 7  discloses a difference from  FIG. 6  flowchart by showing less than all the responses in  72 , where the matching correct response may not be displayed. If the user selects  71  the response not displayed button, then the clicks are increased by one in  65  and the correct choice in  66  is determined as in  FIG. 6 . When the response not displayed button is selected in the correct case, the sequence continues as in  FIG. 6 . 
         [0039]    It can be seen that the disclosed invention not only enhances the ability of the user to learn information through the sequential learning of multiple pieces of information learned by repetition. Thus, the disclosed invention permits the personal computer system PC to be used in a manner which enhances the learning capabilities of the user while minimizing possibilities of boredom. 
         [0040]    While this invention has been described as having a preferred design, it is understood that it is capable of further modifications, uses and/or adaptations, following the general principle of the invention and including such departures from the present disclosure has come within known or customary practice in the art to which the invention pertains, and as may be applied to the central features hereinbefore set forth, and fall within the scope of the invention of the limits of the appended claims.