Abstract:
The present invention relates to a free radical emulsion polymerization process for the formation of substantially gel-free co- or terpolymers of a major portion of at least one conjugated diene and a minor portion of a sulfonate containing monomer, wherein the co- or terpolymers are water insoluble and have about 18 to about 100 meq of sulfonate groups per 100 grams of polymer.

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 326,531, filed Dec. 2, 1981, now abandoned, which is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 117,199, filed Jan. 31, 1980 now abandoned. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     The formation of sulfonate containing polymers has been clearly defined in a number of U.S. Pat. Nos.: 3,642,728; 3,836,511; 3,847,854; 3,870,841; and 3,877,530. These patents teach the formation of sulfonate polymers by contacting a polymer having olefinic unsaturation with a sulfonating agent. 
     This application differs from the previously identified U.S. Patents in that the instant process is directed to the free radical emulsion polymerization of at least one conjugated diene with a sulfonate containing monomer to form a substantially gel free co- or terpolymer having a major portion of a conjugated diene and a minor portion of a sulfonate containing monomer, wherein the co- or terpolymer is water insoluble. 
     2. Prior Art 
     Copolymers and terpolymers containing sulfonate monomers at low levels have been described previously in the art. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,306,871 describes the preparation of latices based on several different vinyl monomers. This prior art is particularly relevant to the instant invention because it distinguishes those features which are characteristic of much of the prior art in the area of metal sulfonate ionomers. 
     The maximum wt. % of sulfonated monomer in the formed polymers of U.S. Pat. No. 3,306,871 is 3 wt. % and these polymers are incapable of forming ionically cross-linked polymers with excellent physical properties such as tensile strength, whereas the minimum wt. % of sulfonate monomer in the instant polymers is 4 wt. % (which is equivalent to about 18 meq. of sulfonate groups per 100 grams of polymer) and these polymers are capable of forming highly ionically cross-linked polymers with vastly improved physical properties such as tensile strength. 
     It has become clear, based on recent work, that sulfonate ionomers can manifest many peculiarities which make their characterization extremely difficult. The foremost of these is a strong ionic cross-linking which makes such materials difficult to dissolve in solution or to achieve melt flow. These techniques are necessary to characterize a polymeric product for subsequent use, for example, as a thermoplastic elastomer or as an oil additive or in similar polymeric applications. The quantification of melt flow properties or selected solution properties therefore becomes an extremely important step in order to know whether these ionomeric products are even being prepared in a reproducible fashion, or whether they are suited for selected applications. 
     This particular problem is exacerbated even more when describing copolymers of diene monomers and metal or amine sulfonate containing monomers, for in this latter case, the probability of a high degree of covalent cross-linking is extremely likely. When concurrent problems of ionic cross-linking and covalent cross-linking are now combined with problems of uniform copolymers obtained between a relatively non-polar hydrocarbon monomer and a highly polar salt molecule, which are normally completely immiscible, and the normal problems of molecular weight control desired of all polymer systems, it becomes evident why there is a paucity of information concerning the characteristics of the isolated sulfonate ionomers obtained by copolymerization of dienes and metal or amine sulfonate containing monomers. In fact, a review of the patent art and the literature suggests that a complete characterization of such systems has not often, if ever, been previously attempted. 
     Possibly, for the above reasons, most of the patent art in this area describes the latices achieved by the presumed reaction of such sulfonate monomers with selected vinyl and diene monomers. That the products are copolymers is presumed, by suggestions, that the resulting latices are more stable, more water resistant, and more adherent than those obtained in the absence of the sulfonate monomer. 
     The instant invention is directed at a different class of copolymers of dienes and metal or amine sulfonate containing monomers. This invention is concerned with the preparation and resultant compositions of dienes and sulfonate monomers which are of desirable molecular weights, are substantially free of covalent cross-linking (less than 10% of the product appears as gel in prescribed tests), contains sulfonate levels of about 18 to about 100 meq. of sulfonate groups per 100 grams of polymer, are water insoluble, and are prepared by a process designed to give products substantially free of homopolymers of any of the polymerizable components, and are solid products, characterizable in terms of reduced viscosity, molecular weight and/or melt flow (at elevated temperatures). 
     The polymers formed by the instant process are those strictly limited to species wherein the sulfonate groups are affixed only to the aromatic rings. For example, in the copolymerization of sulfonated styrene monomer and butadiene monomer one forms by the instant process, a sulfonated styrene-butadiene polymer, wherein all the sulfonate groups are affixed to the aromatic rings. In contrast, when one sulfonates a polymer containing both aromatic groups and aliphatic groups by a direct sulfonation process such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos.: 3,072,618; 3,072,619; 4,186,163 and 3,396,136, one obtains a sulfonated species, wherein the majority of sulfonate groups are affixed to the non-aromatic portion of the polymer. The instant experimental results clearly show that when one directly sulfonates a styrene-butadiene copolymer, at least 84 mole % of the sulfonate groups are affixed to the non-aromatic portion of the styrene-butadiene copolymer, wherein, the styrene-butadiene copolymer formed by the instant, unique and novel process has 100 mole % of the sulfonate groups affixed to the aromatic rings of the sytrene portion of the styrene-butadiene copolymer. 
     In light of the above distinguishing features, it is readily apparent as to why the products and process of the instant invention differ from those of GB No. 895,033. That patent addresses specifically latices based on copolymerization of a suitable aromatic vinyl sulfonic acid derivative with a variety of different polymerizable monomers. It is important to note that all aspects of that invention are solely concerned with the resultant latices, that the products are not descried as isolated entitites. 
     For the purposes of the instant invention, many of the features of the products in GB No. 895,033 are undesirable. For example, it is emphasized in that application that improved latex stability is an asset, for the purpose of the instant invention that improved latex stability can be a debit in that difficulties may be encountered in isolating the solid polymer. 
     Another feature of the instant invention is that the instant disclosure is directed toward products which are demonstrated to be substantially free of covalent cross-linking, and techniques whereby the ionic cross-linking desired in such systems can be separated from the covalent cross-linking. This demonstration has not been illustrated in the prior art for copolymers of sulfonate containing monomers with polymerizable conjugated diolefins. Without this illustration it would be difficult, if not impossible, to employ resultant products in some of their intended applications. 
     Finally, and most importantly, U.S. Pat. No. 3,306,871 and GB No. 895,033, specifically state in column 1, second paragraph of both applications that those inventions were concerned with polymer latices wherein the sulfonic acid salt is incorporated as an anionic stabilizer. It is important to emphasize that in the instant invention, the sulfonate is incorporated at specific levels to function as an ionic cross-linking agent. By that we means that in these systems the neutralized sulfonate provides a salt species which interacts with other salt species to provide a strong ionic cross-link. This characteristic is observed and desired, not in the latex form, but is extremely important in determining the bulk physical properties. 
     In light of the above discussions, it is apparent that the products of this invention differ markedly from those of the prior art in properties, in composition and in their specific structural features. 
     In addition, the catalysts or initiators employed, for example, in GB No. 895,033 differ from those employed in the process of the instant invention. The prior art has suggested that either water soluble free radical-generating catalysts or oil soluble, free radical-generating catalysts are suitable. Alternatively, U.S. Pat. No. 2,913,429 specifies that &#34;it is necessary that the polymerization mixture include a water soluble peroxy compound as a catalyst and it is desirable, but not essential, that it also include an oil soluble catalyst ingredient&#34; (column 2, line 28 forward). 
     The initiators of the instant invention are important and different from those of the prior art for it is believed that they function to give an optimum copolymerization without significant incorporation of either a homopolymer of the hydrocarbon molecule or a homopolymer of the metal sulfonate monomer. If one employs substantial levels of an oil soluble initiator which can spontaneously polymerize solely in the diene phase, then that species can be polymerized without a corresponding incorporation of the sulfonate species. By appropriate selection of one catalyst component soluble in the polymerizable hydrocarbon phase and a second catalyst component soluble in the aqueous phase, then the interaction of these components can result in a more uniform copolymerization, predominantly at the interface. 
     Another patent which can be considered to be relevant to the instant invention and which teaches ionic cross-linking is that of Rees, U.S. Pat. No. 3,322,734. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 3,322,734 teaches that ionically cross-linked copolymers may be prepared via direct copolymerization and teaches how such ionic cross-linking can change the properties of polymers. However, that patent specifically is directed at neutralization levels of between 10 and 90% of the acid species present. The instant invention is directed at neutralization levels of 95% and above, and preferably at inomers which are 100% neutralized. The properties of the resulting material, which are 100% neutralized, are substantially different from those which are only 50% or 90% neutralized. Therefore, the instant invention is substantially different from that of U.S. Pat. No. 3,322,734. 
     In addition to the above art, mention should be made of U.S. Pat. No. 2,913,429 which is concerned with synthetic latices designed to form films which are based on aqueous dispersions of copolymers of one or more aliphatic conjugated diolefins with at least two monovinyl aromatic compounds including a monovinyl aromatic sulfonate. 
     This invention differs from that prior art in the following: 
     (1) This application is not concerned with films from latices. 
     (2) That invention contains from 4 to 35, preferably 5 to 15 wt. % sulfur monomer and thereby provides coatings or films which can readily be removed from substrates by washing or scrubbing with water. Obviously, those cited systems were designed to be water sensitive and thereby removable. 
     (3) That cited patent requires 93 to 25, preferably from 77 to 45% vinyl aromatic compound such as sytrene. The instant application does not permit more than 10% styrene. 
     (4) That invention requires a water soluble peroxy compound as initiator, whereas this application requires a hydrocarbon soluble peroxy initiator. 
     (5) These polymers of U.S. Pat. No. 2,913,429 contain a maximum of 40% wt. % of conjugated diene and are thermoplastic in nature, whereas the elastomeric polymers of the instant invention contain a minimum of 55% wt. % of conjugated diene. 
     (6) The polymers of U.S. Pat. No. 2,913,429 are water sensitive and films formed from these polymers can be removed from a substrate by washing with water, whereas the polymers of the instant application are water insensitive. 
     There are many other distinctions, but it is obvious that the above invention is directed at essentially rigid removable paint films, wherein the sulfonate groups provide adequate water sensitivity to permit the formation of a stable latex which further can be deposited as a removable film. Nowhere in that invention is the concept of a metal sulfonate copolymer possessing strong ionic cross-links in the bulk product taught, inferred, or even desired. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention relates to a free radical copolymerization process for the preparation of sulfonate containing water insoluble co- or terpolymers, wherein the resultant co- or terpolymers have an Mn of 5,000 to 200,000 and these co- or terpolymers have about 18 to about 100 meq. of sulfonate groups per 100 grams of polymer. The free radical copolymerization process of the instant invention can be generally described as a free radical emulsion polymerization of at least one conjugated diene with a sulfonate monomer which is water soluble, at a temperature sufficient to cause polymerization, wherein the initiator is preferably based on a peroxide initiator accelerated by a reducing agent, and suitable surfactants are employed. Upon completion of the free radical polymerization, the resultant latex is coagulated and the water insoluble polymer is recovered. 
     GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     The solid elastomeric co- or terpolymer of the instant invention comprise at least 80% by weight of at least one conjugated diene having from 4 to 12 carbon atoms and a minor proportion of a metal or amine neutralized sulfonate monomer characterized by the formula: ##STR1## wherein Y is a cation selected from Groups IA, IIA, IB and IIB of the Periodic Table or an amine of the formula: ##STR2## where R 1  and R 2  can be aliphatic groups of C 1  to C 12  or hydrogen, the co- or terpolymer being water insoluble having about 18 to about 100 meq. of sulfonate groups per 100 grams. 
     The polymers formed by the instant process are those strictly limited to species wherein the sulfonate groups are affixed only to the aromatic rings. For example, in the copolymerization of sulfonated styrene monomer and butadiene monomer, one forms by the instant process, a sulfonated sytrene-butadiene polymer, wherein all the sulfonate groups are affixed to the aromatic rings. In contrast, when one sulfonates a polymer containing both aromatic groups and aliphatic groups by a direct sulfonation process such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos.: 3,072,618; 3,072,619; 4,186,163 and 3,396,136, one obtains a sulfonated species, wherein the majority of sulfonate groups are affixed to the non-aromatic portion of the polymer. The instant experimental results clearly show that when one directly sulfonates a styrene-butadiene copolymer, at least 84 mole % of the sulfonate groups are affixed to the non-aromatic portion of the sytrene-butadiene copolymer, wherein the styrene-butadiene copolymer formed by the instant, unique and novel process has 100 mole % of the sulfonated groups affixed to the aromatic rings of the sytrene portion of the styrene-butadiene copolymer. 
     The instant invention relates to the formation of sulfonate containing co- or terpolymers which are formed by a free radical copolymerization process. The monomers used in the free radical emulsion copolymerization process are conjugated dienes which are copolymerized with sulfonate containing monomers. 
     In general, the conjugated diene and sulfonate containing monomer are dispersed in a water phase in the presence of an initiator which is soluble in the conjugated diene phase, a water soluble reducing agent and a suitable surfactant, wherein the temperature is sufficient to initiate polymerization. The resultant latex is coagulated usually by the addition of an aqueous salt solution and the recovered co- or terpolymer is washed with water and subsequently dried under vacuum at room temperature. Alternatively, the latex can be coagulated by the addition of methanol. 
     The co- or terpolymers formed from the free radical emulsion copolymerization process of the instant invention can be generally described as having an Mn of about 5,000 to about 200,000, more preferably about 10,000 to about 100,000. The co- or terpolymers of the instant invention contain about 18 to about 100 meq. of sulfonate groups per 100 grams of polymer, more preferably, about 18 to about 90, and most preferably about 20 to about 80. Typical, but non-limiting examples of the copolymers which can be formed by the instant free radical emulsion copolymerization process are: butadiene/sodium styrene sulfonate copolymer, isoprene/sodium styrene sulfonate copolymer, butadiene/sodium vinyl sulfonate, isoprene/sodium vinyl sulfonate copolymer. Obviously, a large number of copolymers and even terpolymers can be formed by the instant free radical copolymerization process. Typically, the copolymerization of any conjugated diene can be readily copolymerized with any sulfonate containing monomer, as is defined herein. Terpolymers with styrene, acrylonitrile, vinyl chloride as the termonomers with the aforementioned dienes are also contemplated provided that no more than 10 wt. % of the termonomer is combined therein. 
     Conjugated Dienes 
     The conjugated dienes of the instant invention are generally defined as acyclic conjugated dienes containing from about 4 to about 10 carbon atoms, more preferably about 4 to 6 carbon atoms. Typical, but non-limiting, examples of acyclic conjugated dienes are piperidene, 1,3-butadiene, isoprene (1-methyl-1,3-butadiene), 2,3-dimethyl, 1,3-butadiene, 1,3-pentadiene, 2-methyl-1,3-pentadiene, 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-pentadiene, 3-methyl-1,3-pentadiene, 2-phenyl butadiene, chloroprene and piperidene. Typical, but non-limiting examples of cyclic conjugated dienes are cyclopentadiene and methyl cyclopentadiene. The preferred conjugated dienes of the instant invention are selected from the group consisting of 1,3-butadiene, isoprene, chloroprene. In the formation of the sulfonate containing copolymer, one copolymerizes one of the aforementioned conjugated dienes with the sulfonate containing monomer. Sulfonate containing terpolymers can be readily formed by copolymerizing the sulfonate containing monomer with a mixture of two of the above-identified conjugated dienes. 
     Sulfonate Containing Monomers 
     The sulfonate containing monomers of the instant invention which are water soluble can be generally described as a monomer having unsaturation and a metal or amine sulfonate group. The metal or amine neutralized sulfonate monomer is characterized by the formula: ##STR3## wherein Y is a cation selected from Groups IA, IIA, IB and IIB of the Periodic Table or an amine of the formula: ##STR4## where R 1  and R 2  can be aliphatic groups of C 1  to C 12  or hydrogen. Particularly suitable metal cations are sodium, potassium, and zinc, and an especially preferred metal cation is sodium. A typical, but non-limiting example of suitable sulfonate containing monomer is: ##STR5## 
     An especially preferred sulfonate containing monomer is metal styrene sulfonate. The molar ratio of sulfonate containing monomer to conjugated diene is about 1/200 to about 1/5, more preferably about 1/150 to about 1/6, and most preferably about 1/100 to about 1/9. 
     The redox emulsion polymerization recipe used in this invention is effective in initiating the copolymerization of water insoluble and water soluble comonomers in an emulsion system. Because the peroxide initiator is dissolved in the monomer and the ferrous ion redox activator is dissolved in the water, the surface of the micelle/growing polymer particle is believed to be the locus of formation of initiator molecules as well as the polymerization locus. Water phase homopolymerization of the polar, water soluble monomer is effectively depressed because of low primary radical concentration in the aqueous phase. 
     Similarly, the activity of the free radical catalyst in the hydrocarbon monomer phase is substantially less than in the vicinity of the reducing agent. As a result, the polymerization of homopolymers is believed to be effectively depressed. 
     Reducing agents suitable for this invention are those known in the art with the additional requirement that they be soluble in water. A preferred reducing agent is (NH 4 ) 2  FeSO 4 . 
     A variety of free radical catalyst can be employed in this invention with the requirement that they are substantially soluble in the diene monomer phase. This includes a preferential class of free radical initiators such as benzoyl peroxide, cumene peroxide, diisopropylbenzene hydroperoxide, t-butyl hydroperoxide and similar systems which will be preferentially soluble in the monomer phase as opposed to the aqueous phase. There are a large number of such peroxides used in the art and those having the appropriate solubility behavior and suitable decomposition temperatures in the presence of the reducing agents are satisfactory for the purposes of this invention. 
     The surfactants employed for this invention are varied and well known in the art. The typical emulsifiers or surfactants can be employed, however, some are more effective than others in generating latices of better stability. A preferred emulsifier is sodium lauryl sulfate. 
     The buffering agents employed in the instant polymerization process are selected from the group consisting of sodium carbonate, ammonia, sodium acetate, trisodium phosphate etc. These buffering agents are employed at a concentration of about 0.1 to about 5 grams per 100 grams water employed in the emulsion system. 
     Chain transfer agents can be readily employed in the instant polymerization process for controlling the molecular weight of the resultant copolymer. The concentration of chain transfer agent is from 0 to about 1.0 grams per 100 grams of the combined weight of the sulfonate containing monomer and the conjugated diene. 
     The free radical emulsion copolymerization of the water soluble sulfonate containing polymer and the conjugated diene yields a stable latex, wherein the resultant water insoluble co- or terpolymer is not covalently cross-linked and possesses substantial ionic cross-linking, and has about 18 to about 100 meq. of sulfonate groups per 100 grams of polymer, more preferably about 18 to about 90. The resultant latex can be coagulated by the addition of an aqueous salt solution to the emulsion at a volume ratio of the aqueous salt solution to total volume of the emulsion of about 10 to about 0.5, more preferably about 3 to about 0.7, and most preferably about 2 to about 1. The water insoluble co- or terpolymer is recovered by filtration and substantially washed with water and dried under vacuum conditions. Alternatively, the polymer can be coagulated by precipitation with alcohol such as methanol. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     As exemplified in the following illustrative examples, a series of copolymers were prepared. 
     EXAMPLE 1 
     Reaction Formulation: 
     15.6 g. butadiene 
     1.6 g. sodium styrene sulfonate (NaSS) 
     25 g. boiled, distilled water 
     0.064 g. benzoyl peroxide (initiator) 
     0.159 g. (NH 4 ) 2  FeSO 4 .6H 2  O (reducing agent) 
     0.649 g. sodium lauryl sulfate (emulsifier) 
     0.198 g. Na 4  P 2  O 7 .10H 2  O (buffer) 
     0.085 g. 1-dodecanethiol (chain transfer agent) 
     A free radical emulsion polymerization was carried out in a 10-ounce crown capped beverage bottle at room temperature (˜25° C.). The reaction emulsion was agitated with a Teflon-coated magnetic stir bar and stirrer. The reaction was carried out for 20 hours to a yield of 27%, and the latex was coagulated by the addition of an aqueous salt solution. The recovered polymer was washed with water and dried under vacuum at room temperature. 
     The butadiene-NaSS copolymer contained 3.8 mole % NaSS (2.0 wt. % sulfur) and had a reduced viscosity of 2.41 dl/g in a mixed solvent of 95% xylene and 5% methanol at a concentration of 0.2 g/dl. The copolymer was not tacky, appeared to be a strong, elastic-solid, and was soluble in a mixed solvent of xylene and methanol (95/5). In the absence of the proper solvent system, this material could have been considered to be covalently cross-linked. These experiments show that it was not. 
     The above sample was compression molded at 250° F. and analyzed using thermal mechanical analysis. The particular pad examined manifested several transitions when heated at 10° C./minute. A glass transition was clearly apparent at -78° C. and a second transition at elevated temperatures near 125° C. was apparent. This latter transition was gradual in nature and could be interpreted in part as dissociation of the ionic groups at elevated temperatures. 
     EXAMPLE 2 
     Reaction Formulation: 
     89 g. butadiene 
     9.6 g. NaSS 
     160 g. boiled, distilled water 
     0.37 g. genzoyl peroxide 
     0.96 g. (NH 4 ) 2  FeSO 4 .6H 2  O 
     7.50 g. sodium lauryl sulfate 
     0.94 g. Na 4  P 2  O 7 .10H 2  O 
     1.8 g. 1-dodecanethiol 
     The emulsion polymerization was carried out, as described in Example 1, for 67 hours to a yield of 77%. The latex was coagulated by the addition to methanol. The copolymer contained 2.07 mole % NaSS (1.17 wt. % sulfur) and had an intrinsic viscosity of 1.25 dl/g in a mixed solvent of 95% toluene and 5% methanol. The copolymer was a non-tacky, tough, transparent solid and was nearly completely soluble in a toluene/methanol mixed solvent (95/5). 
     EXAMPLE 3 
     Reaction Formulation: 
     93 g. butadiene 
     0 NaSS 
     160 g. boiled, distilled water 
     0.37 g. benzoyl peroxide 
     0.95 g. (NH 4 ) 2  FeSO 4 .6H 2  O 
     7.5 g. sodium lauryl sulfate 
     0.94 g. Na 4  P 2  O 7 . 10H 2  O 
     1.8 g. 1-dodecanethiol 
     The formulation of Example 3 was conducted in the same way as Example 2. It will be noted that no sodium styrene sulfonate was added. When isolated after 40 hours, using the procedure of Example 2, the resulting transparent polymer was completely soluble in xylene processed in intrinsic viscosity of 1.7 and was tacky with little apparent strength. These results show clearly that the presence of the metal sulfonate groups at the appropriate level dramatically alters the properties and solubility of the resulting product. 
     EXAMPLE 4 
     Reaction Formulation: 
     101.4 g. Isoprene 
     9.62 g. sodium styrene sulfonate 
     150 g. boiled distilled water 
     0.374 g. benzoyl peroxide 
     0.951 g. (NH 4 ) 2  FeSO 4 .6H 2  O 
     11.25 g. sodium lauryl sulfate 
     0.966 g. Na 4  P 2  O 7 .10H 2  O 
     The formulation was combined and the reaction conducted as in Example 2. The product was divided into three parts and coagulated with three different salt solutions employing (a) aluminum chloride; (b) zinc chloride; and (c) magnesium sulfate as the respective coagulating solutions. The isolated products from each of these coagulating systems appeared somewhat different in appearance and properties. The products from (b) and (c) analyzed for 1.55 and 1.33 wt. % sulfur respectively. The product from (a) was insoluble in xylene, but was found to dissolve completely in a mixture of 95% xylene/5% methanol. This clear yellow solution containing 2% polymer was modestly viscous. Based on other work, it has been observed that an excellent test for ionomer behavior (of U.S. Application Ser. No. 930,044) is a combination of significant water levels (5 to 200%) to a polymer solution based on hydrocarbon solvent with a low level of water miscible alcohol such as methanol. If the polymer contains, incorporated with the polymer structure, strongly interacting metal sulfonate groups, the addition of water will extract alcohol into the aqueous phase and a gelled hydrocarbon phase will result. When the solution above was contacted with water and agitated, a white gel appeared, demonstrating the presence of true copolymer. 
     EXAMPLE 5 
     Reaction Formulation: 
     14.3 g. Isoprene 
     2.52 g. sodium styrene sulfonate 
     25 g. boiled distilled water 
     0.061 g. benzoyl peroxide 
     0.157 g. (NH 4 ) 2  FeSO 4 .6H 2  O 
     0.624 g. sodium lauryl suflate 
     0.155 g. Na 4  P 2  O 7 .10H 2  O 
     The reaction was conducted, as in Example 1, for 24 hours at room temperature in serum capped flasks stirred with teflon-covered, magnetic stirrer bars. The product yield was 64%, the sulfur content of the resulting product was 1.24 wt. %. The intrinsic viscosity in 95% xylene/5% methanol was 1.07, and the product was observed to be an elastic solid. The isolated product was analyzed via thermal mechanical analysis with a weighted load of 10 grams and a heating rate of 10° C./minute. A low temperature transition of -60° C. was clearly seen corresponding to a polymer glass transition, while at higher temperatures, a more gradual softening point was seen estimated to be 123° C. This latter transition is interpreted as the dissociation temperature of the metal sulfonate associations. 
     INTRODUCTION TO EXAMPLES 6 AND 7 
     A series of sulfonated styrene-butadiene copolymers were prepared as outlined in the following Examples. The objective of these studies was to determine where the sulfonating agents functionalized the polymer. Previous work has suggested that both aromatic groups and unsaturation can be sulfonated when working with different polymer systems. In the case of aromatic sulfonation, it has been observed that those reactions conducted with acetyl sulfate and other mild sulfonating agents are not reactive at room temperature in hydrocarbon diluents. Therefore, it is expected that sulfonation with such reagents of styrene-butadiene copolymer would lead to a product where few, if any, of the aromatic groups were sulfonated under these conditions. If so, then the copolymerization of a vinyl aromatic sulfonate monomer with styrene and butadiene must lead to a different polymer structure than one obtained by sulfonation of preformed polymer. The following experiments will demonstrate that point. 
     EXAMPLE 6 
     Sulfonation of styrene-butadiene with acetyl sulfate 
     A 2-liter, round-bottom, 2-neck flask fitted with a stirrer and water condenser was charged with: 
     100 g. finely diced styrene-butadiene 1502; 
     1000 ml. analytical grade hexane the polymer-hexane mixture was stirred overnight to insure dissolution of the SBR. 
     Fresh actyl sulfate was prepared as follows: 
     16.8 ml. H 2  SO 4  was slowly added clockwise to 43.2 ml. of chilled acetic anhydride stirring in a dry-ice bath to maintain temperature at -5° C. After addition of H 2  SO 4  is completed, the resulting solution is allowed to warm to at least +5° C. prior to use. 
     Half of the SBR-hexane solution (550 ml.) was charged to a 1-liter flask and stirred while 2.5 ml. of the freshly prepared acetyl sulfate was added. The reaction mixture becomes light purple in color. 
     After allowing to stir for 60 minutes, a &#34;free acid&#34; sample (about 10 ml.) is removed, terminated in MEOH/water and subsequently steam-stripped and mill-dried. The remaining reaction mixture is neutralized with the addition of 3.4 g. sodium acetate in 22 ml. MEOH/2.7 ml. water. Stabilizier 2246 in the amount of 0.1 g. is added. 
     The neutralized reaction mixture is then steam-stripped to recover polymer which was then mill-dried (85° to 100° C.) to remove water. 
     Analysis of the recovered products show: &#34;Free acid&#34;--0.51% Sulfur. Neutralized Polymer--0.27% Sulfur; 0.48% Sodium. 
     This and other polymers of varying sulfonate content were then analyzed by infrared spectroscopy to determine the specific sites where the sulfonate groups were attached. 
     EXAMPLE 7 
     Sulfonation of Styrene-butadiene Using SBR-1J02 Recovered From THF Solution by Precipitation in Water 
     A solution of 100 g. styrene-butadiene 1502 in 1000 ml. tetrahydrofuran was prepared. The solution was poured into hot water to precipitate the SBR, followed by repeated washings with hot water. The recovered polymer was then mill-dried (85°-100° C.) to remove water. 
     A solution of 25 g. of the above recovered and dried SBR was prepared in 250 ml. hexane. 
     To this SBR-hexane solution, 7.5 ml. of freshly prepared acetyl sulfate (preparation as described in Example 1) was added. A dark purple color developed. After 60 minutes of stirring, a 10 ml. &#34;free acid&#34; sample was taken, terminated in MEOH/H 2  O and subsequently steam-stripped and mill-dried. 
     The reaction was then neutralized with 10.2 g. sodium acetate in 66 ml. MEOH/8.1 ml. water. Finally, 0.1 g. of stabilizer 2246 was added. The neutralized reaction mixture was steam-striped to recover polymer and mill-dried (85°-100° C.) to remove water. 
     Analysis: &#34;Free Acid&#34;--1.93% Sulfur. Neutralized Polymer--1.31% Sulfur, 0.68% Sodium. 
     Analysis of Sulfonated SBR Products Via Infrared Spectroscopy 
     The starting styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) appeared to consist of about 25 weight styrene units. It is assumed that the distribution of butadiene units in the SBR is about 70 to 75% trans-1,4 units or type II trans unsaturation, and about 10-15% each of cis-1,4 units (II-cis unsaturation) and 1,2 units (vinyl or I unsaturation). 
     The sulfonated SBR samples examined in this study ranged from about 0.26 wt. % sulfur up to 1.31 wt. % sulfur. Sulfonate absorbence values were measured 585 cm -1  and when plotted against sulfur values determined by elemental analysis, gave essentially a linear relationship (Table I). The absorbence value was arbitrarily set at 1.00 for the sample containing the highest sulfur content. These results show that the sulfur incorporated in these polymers can be shown to be directly proportional to sulfonate content determined by infrared spectroscopy. In selected samples, inorganic sulfate was also present as denoted by absorption peaks at 622 cm -1 . Sample 59-C (1.31% sulfur) exhibited no peaks at that wavelength. 
     A careful analysis was conducted on the mono-substituted aromatic ring absorption peaks at 760 cm -1 . Based on analysis of five samples, no more than 2.5% of the aromatic units in the starting polymer could have been involved in either sulfonation or alkylation reactions of Table I. Thus, a maximum of 16% of the sulfonate functionality can be associated with the aromatic units. In all probability, the actual value may be substantially less than that. In other words, at least 84% of the estimated sulfonate functionality in sample 59-C is probably located on butadiene units. 
     Infrared analysis of the behavior of vinyl unsaturation (1,2 butadiene units) shows that the introduction of 41.5 mmoles of sulfonate functionality per 100 grams of rubber can be responsible for a maximum of about 10 mmoles of sulfonate functionality being associated with the vinyl unsaturation of Tables III and IV. The remaining sulfonate functionality in this polymer sample (25 mmoles per 100 grams rubber) is therefore located on the 1,4-butadiene units. The complication in pinpointing the exact level of 1,4 unsaturation involved is due to the fact that the conditions of sulfonation induce a significant increase in Type II unsaturation over the starting unsulfonated rubber. This increase may be a result of chain scission. These data are shown in Table V. The important observation here is that an increase in sulfonate content at the higher sulfonate levels is correlatable with a significant change in both cis-1,4 and trans-1,4 with a significant change in both cis-unsaturation. Based on this analysis, there is no question that cis-1,4 structure is much more reactive and is consumed more readily under sulfonation conditions. 
     In summary, these infrared results can be interpreted unambiguously as demonstrating that sulfonation reactions occur predominantly on the unsaturated moieties of the SBR system. These data are completely consistent with the known lack of reactivity of the aromatic species with mild sulfonating reagents in non-polar solvents at ambient temperatures. These data are also consistent with the demonstrated ability to sulfonated unsaturated polymers selectively in the presence of a large excess of an aromatic solvent. Therefore, the sulfonation of a polymer containing both aromatic groups and cis- or trans-1,4 unsaturation will lead to a product in which the sulfonate is predominately located on the 1,4 unsaturation and not on the aromatic group. 
     
                       TABLE I______________________________________Relationship of Sulfonate Functionality andElemental Sulfur levels (Relative Basis)         Sulfonation AbsorbenceWeight % Sulfur         (585 cm.sup.-1)______________________________________0             00.26          .125.45           .28.60           .461.31          1.00______________________________________ 
    
     
                       TABLE II______________________________________Relationship of Mono-Substituted AromaticRings (760 cm.sup.-1 Absorbence) toSulfonate Level (Relative Basis)Sulfonate Absorbence            Aromatic Absorbence(585 cm.sup.-1)  (585 cm.sup.-1)______________________________________0                .99.13              1.00.28              .975.46              .981.00             .99______________________________________ 
    
     
                       TABLE III______________________________________Vinyl Unsaturation vs. Sulfonate Absorbence(Relative Basis)Sulfonate Absorbence            Vinyl Unsaturation(585 cm.sup.-1)  (585 cm.sup.-1)______________________________________0                .995.13              .98.28              .98.46              1.0151.00             .955______________________________________ 
    
     
                       TABLE IV______________________________________Type 1 Unsaturation vs. Sulfonate Absorbence(Relative Basis)Sulfonate Absorbence            Type 1 Unsaturation(585 cm.sup.-1)  (1640 cm.sup.-1)______________________________________0                1.00.13              .99.28              .96.46              .921.00             .89______________________________________ 
    
     
                       TABLE V______________________________________1,4 BUTADIENE Unsaturation (Trans II and Cis II)vs. Sulfonate Absorbence (Relative Basis)           Trans II   Cis IISulfonate Absorbence           Unsaturation                      Unsaturation(585 cm.sup.-1) (960 cm.sup.-1)                      (1405 cm.sup.-1)______________________________________0               .83        .79.13             .97        .96.28             1.00       1.00.46             .92        .831.00            .87        .62______________________________________