Abstract:
A method for calculating the surfaces of optical lenses including the steps of: providing a desired light distribution to be generated with light passing through the lens; deforming a first surface of the lens to generate light source images of different sizes; deforming a second surface of the lens to displace the light source images such that they lie at their highest point directly at or on a light/dark border in a resulting light distribution; determining a quality of the resulting light distribution by a comparison with the predefined light distribution; if the quality lies above a predefined limit value, storing the calculated surfaces for the lens; otherwise, renewed deformation of the first surface; renewed deformation of the second surface; repeating the previous two steps until the quality of the resulting light distribution lies above the limit value; and storing the calculated surfaces for the lens.

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION 
     This application is based upon and claims priority to German Patent Application No. DE 102013215897.1 filed on Aug. 12, 2013. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     The present invention relates, generally, to light modules for motor vehicle headlamps and, more specifically, to a method for calculating the surface area of optical lenses and projection lenses manufactured according to the method for use in a light module in a motor vehicle headlamp. 
     2. Description of the Related Art 
     Projection lenses known in the art used with light modules in motor vehicle headlamps are typically designed to project at least a portion of light emitted from a light source in the light module onto a road surface in front of the motor vehicle so as to generate a low beam light distribution. 
     In the field of motor vehicle lighting devices, in particular in the field of motor vehicle headlamps, one can, in principle, differentiate between two different types of light modules. With so-called reflection modules, the desired light distribution on the road surface in front of the motor vehicle is generated with a reflector, which reflects the light emitted by the light source onto the road surface in order to generate the desired low beam light distribution. With projection modules, an additional projection lens is disposed in the beam path and projects the light bundled by the reflector or other type of primary lens, for generating the desired low beam light distribution onto the road surface in front of the motor vehicle. In order to generate the low beam light distribution, typically an aperture assembly is disposed between the primary lens and the projection lens, wherein an upper edge of the aperture assembly is designed to generate a light/dark border in the low beam light distribution from the projection lens onto the road surface in front of the motor vehicle. 
     Reflection modules have different sized light source images in the resulting light distribution, due to different spacings and perspectives of light sources and reflector ranges. These differently sized light source images can be used well in the configuration of a reflection module of this type for making use of the light source images in order to illuminate different regions in the resulting light distribution. As such, the use, for example, of small light source images for creating the light/dark border in the low beam light distribution and to obtain the largest possible range for the light distribution is known in the art, in that the small light source images are reflected to a position in the light distribution that is as close as possible to the bottom of the light/dark border. Large light source images, conversely, are frequently used to illuminate the foreground or close-range in front of the vehicle, as well for illuminating the lateral regions in the resulting light distribution. In particular, the desire to direct light into the distance, directly beneath the light/dark border, so as to obtain a greatest possible range for the resulting light distribution, is only possible with the smallest possible light source images. 
     With projection modules, reflectors or other types of primary lenses are used for bundling the light emitted from a light source. As such, the use of lens systems or so-called adapter lenses, for example, is known in the art. Adapter lenses are normally manufactured from transparent glass or plastic material, in which the light emitted from the light source is coupled. The coupled light is, at least in part, subjected to a total internal reflection at the outer border surfaces, and then exits the adapter lens. The portion of the coupled light not subjected to a total internal reflection preferably exits the adapter lens directly. The bundling of the light occurs thereby through refraction at the light entry and/or light exit surface, and through the total internal reflection at the border surfaces of the adapter lens. 
     Further, secondary lenses are used with projection modules, in order to image the bundled light onto the road surface, and to generate the desired low beam light distribution. The secondary lenses can be designed as reflectors or as projection lenses. The projection lenses can image the light distribution, generated with the bundled light in an intermediate plane, into the distance, or can be designed as a so-called direct imaging system. 
     With direct imaging projection modules, a light source, which may include one or more light emitting diodes (LEDs), for example, is imaged onto the road surface via the projection lens, without the need for further optically active surfaces for bundling or deflecting the light beams. Direct imaging projection modules of this type generate light distributions with a suitable shape of the projection lens, which exhibits a defined expansion in both the horizontal and vertical direction. 
     In addition, projection lenses known in the art may be designed so as to generate a low beam light distribution having a substantially horizontal light/dark border without an additional aperture assembly disposed in the beam path. In this way, the light/dark border can fulfill the ECE, SAE, or any other government-mandated requirements. 
     The projection lenses known in the art for use in light modules for a motor vehicle headlamp are shaped such that one side of the lens is either planar, convex, or concave. In this case, the divergence of the light beams exiting a known projection lens is nearly uniform over the entire light exit surface of the projection lens. The images of the light source with a projection lens of this type all have a similar size on a measurement screen disposed at a spacing to the light module, or to the motor vehicle headlamp, respectively. As a result, the projection modules differ significantly from the reflection modules. 
     As a result, with the nearly same sized light source images generated by a projection module, it is not possible, in generating the resulting light distribution from a projection module of this type, to deflect differently sized light source images in different regions of the resulting light distribution. In particular, there are no particularly small images that can be used to generate a large range for the light distribution, and there are no particularly large light source images that can be used to illuminate the foreground or lateral illumination areas in the region of the light distribution. In order for the resulting light distribution of the projection module to therefore fulfill the demanded customer requirements, it is known from the prior art to deflect the basically same sized light source images into the desired regions of the light distribution, without affecting their sizes. In particular with the known projection modules, a satisfactory foreground illumination is only possible by lowering the relatively small light source images. This means that light source images from one region need to be pushed downward, to directly beneath the light/dark border in the foreground of the light distribution. This results in a weakening of the range and the gradient at the light/dark border. 
     It would be theoretically possible to modify the imaging scale via the spacing between the light source and the projection lens. In order to obtain small light source images, the spacing would then need to be increased. This, however, would necessitate enlarging the projection lens transverse to the beam direction, in order to accommodate the same spatial angle with respect to the light source. Alternatively, with the same dimensions transverse to the angle of radiation, less light passes through the projection lens, weakening the efficiency of the projection module. 
     Thus, there remains a need in the art for a method for calculating the surfaces of optical lenses, a projection lens, a projection module, and/or a motor vehicle headlamp in this respect, such that imaging systems with different imaging scales can be generated, wherein different sized light source images are available which can then be deflected in a targeted manner into the desired regions of the resulting light distribution. In particular, it is desirable to have smaller light source images available for illuminating the region of the light distribution directly beneath the light/dark border, and larger light source images available for illuminating a region of the light distribution in the foreground and/or the lateral regions of the light distribution, with a direct imaging projection module. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention overcomes the disadvantages in the prior art in a method of calculating the surfaces of optical lenses. The method includes the steps of: a) provision of a desired light distribution, which is generated by the light passing through the calculated lens; b) deformation of a first surface of the lens, with the aim of generating different sized light source images in the light distribution; c) deformation of a second surface of the lens lying opposite the first surface, with the aim of displacing all of the light source images such that they lie at their respective uppermost point directly at or on a light/dark border of a resulting light distribution, which is obtained with the lens having the deformed surfaces; d) determination of a quality of the resulting light distribution through comparison with the predefined light distribution; e) if the quality lies above a predefined limit value, storing the calculated surfaces for the lens and ending the method; f) otherwise, renewed deformation of the first surface, with the aim of generating a greater or lesser bundling of the light source images in the light distribution; g) renewed deformation of the second surface, with the aim of displacing all of the light source images such that they lie at their respective highest points at or on the light/dark border of the resulting light distribution; h) repetition of the steps f) and g) until the quality of the resulting light distribution lies above the limit value; and i) storing the calculated surfaces for the lens, and ending the method. 
     The desired light distribution can be defined in step a) by government-mandated regulations (for example, ECE, SAE or other regulations), or by the desires of a client (for example, a headlamp manufacturer or a motor vehicle manufacturer). As such, it may, for example, be the desire of a client to obtain a low beam light distribution corresponding to government-mandated regulations, having a particularly sharp light/dark border and/or a foreground illumination that starts particularly close to the vehicle, and/or one or more lateral regions that are particularly brightly illuminated. This can be attained with a light module, or headlamp, respectively, of the invention, having a projection lens, the surfaces of which are calculated in accordance with the method of the invention. 
     Step b) is simulated on a computer using a mathematical model for calculating the lens. In one embodiment, discrete points on the lens surface are calculated, or varied, thereby, such that the light beams passing through the deformed regions of the lens generate larger or smaller light source images, respectively. The sizes of the light source images can likewise be simulated using a mathematical model for the beam path of the deformed lens. The deformation of the first lens surface is the prerequisite for being able to provide a good illumination in the foreground and/or lateral regions of the light distribution in the resulting light distribution, while, at the same time, however, there still being sufficient light available for generating a sharp light/dark border. This is obtained in that—unlike in the prior art until now—the light source images are not simply lowered into the foreground, or moved to the side in the lateral regions, respectively. In this case, the light moved into the foreground or into the lateral regions would not be available for generating the light/dark border. Instead, a first lens surface is deformed with the invention in such a manner that different sized light source images are generated. 
     In step c), the other lens surface is then deformed, such that all light source images each lie at their highest point at or on the light/dark border. This too is calculated in the framework of a simulation using a mathematical model for the deformed lens. The light source images are thus directed as closely as possible to the light/dark border. The large light source images extend in their lower regions into foreground. The lower portion of the large light source images can thus be used to illuminate the foreground. At the same time, however, the upper regions of the large images are disposed at or on the light/dark border, such that no light is lost there, as is the case with the prior art, as a result of the lowering of all of the light source images into the foreground. For this, the type and scope of the deformation of the lens surfaces can be defined by external ancillary conditions. These ancillary conditions can be, for example, structural specifications (for example, space restrictions) for the light module or the headlamp. As such, a deformation of the lens surfaces in the lower region of the lens with light modules disposed deeply in the headlamp can be undertaken in such a manner that in this region, small light source images are generated. As a result of the light bundles diverging to a lesser extent, less light strikes a masking frame, for example, such that more light is available for generating the resulting light distribution, and at the same time, disruptive reflections are reduced. One approach for deforming the surfaces in the upper and lower regions of the lens enables the generation of a light distribution that until now could only be implemented with reflection systems. For this, preferably regions from which the initially large light source images are obtained are deformed such that the light source images are further enlarged. An analogous approach can be used to generate even smaller light source images from initially small images. 
     In step d), the quality of the resulting light distribution can be determined in an arbitrary manner with a comparison with the light distribution previously defined in step a). As such, one could check, for example, whether the maximum for the intensity distribution lies at a predefined point in the light distribution, in particular, sufficiently close to the light/dark border. Likewise, it is also possible to check whether the intensity values for the resulting light distribution in the foreground and/or lateral regions of the light distribution fulfill the requirements for the predefined light distribution. Moreover, it is conceivable to check whether the intensity values above the light/dark border do not exceed a legal, predefined maximum. The evaluation of the resulting light distribution can thus occur based on numerous different criteria. The determination of the quality of the light distribution can be carried out manually, or in an automated manner. If the quality of the resulting light distribution does not satisfy the predefined demands (compare step f)), then the surfaces of the lens to be calculated are further deformed (compare steps g) and h)) in an iterative procedure, such that, on one hand, different sized light source images are generated, and the light source images all lie at their uppermost points at or on the light/dark border, and such that, on the other hand, however, the resulting light distribution formed by the overlapping of the individual light source images corresponds as much as possible to the predefined light distribution. In order to determine the quality of the resulting light distribution, it is also possible to simply count the number of iterations that have been executed. In one embodiment of the invention, the iterative procedure can be stopped after a predefined number of iterations. As such, it is conceivable, for example, with an intensity maximum of the resulting light distribution that does not lie close enough to the light/dark border, to generate even smaller light source images, in that the divergence of the light bundles for small light source images is reduced even further. A maximum for the smaller images can then be directed even closer to the light/dark border, such that the maximum for the resulting light distribution on the whole moves closer to the light/dark border. Whether the obtained deformation of the lens surfaces during the iterative procedure of the steps g) and h) results in the desired effect is then checked by checking the quality of the resulting light distribution in step h). 
     As soon as a stop criterion is fulfilled, specifically when the quality of the resulting light distribution meets a pre-definable limit value, such as when the resulting light distribution corresponds to the predefined light distribution to the desired extent, the values calculated for the surfaces of the lens are stored. The reaching of a predefined number of iterations can also be defined as a stop criterion. The stored values can be used for the production of a lens corresponding to the values, or for simulation purposes, for example, for the simulation of the beam course of a light module equipped with the lens, or they can be used as CAD data, for example, in designing a light module or headlamp equipped with the lens. 
     It is proposed that the first surface is a light exit surface, and the second surface is a light entry surface. As a matter of course, the method can also be executed if first the light entry surface, for varying the size of the light source images, is deformed, and subsequently the light exit surface, for positioning the highest point on the light source image at or on the light/dark border, is deformed. 
     The imaging properties of a projection lens that has been calculated in this manner is are selected such that, in order to generate the low beam light distribution, small light source images lie directly beneath a light/dark border of the light distribution, and large light source images extend into the foreground and/or lateral regions of the light distribution. 
     Using the projection lens of the invention, imaging systems can be generated having different imaging scales. For this, instead of a typical imaging projection lens, a projection lens is used that sharply focuses only a small region of the intermediate light distribution generated by a primary lens, and the intermediate light distributions from other regions remain diffused, due to a differently modifying, location specific imaging scale, viewed over the vertical section surface of the projection lens. This results in it being possible to generate light source images of different sizes with the projection lens of the invention. In order to generate a maximum and/or a local gradient in the region of the light/dark border of a low beam light distribution, small light source images are used in the light distribution. These can concentrate local light in a very precise manner. In order to generate uniform light distributions, particularly in the foreground region or lateral regions of a light distribution, larger light source images are used. The present invention enables projection systems and motor vehicle headlamps to be designed such that the can generate both small and large light source images using a single projection lens. 
     A projection lens of this type can be calculated using a novel computer program. This program calculates, in a manner similar to that already known for calculating so-called free-form reflectors, a projection module for given structural conditions, having the form of a projection lens, in order that a desired light distribution having a desired number and position of relatively small and large light source images can be generated. 
     The structural conditions for a projection module are, for example, the spacing between a light source and the projection lens, a diameter of the projection lens, a focal length of the projection lens, a configuration of the projection lens with respect to a focal point of the projection lens, the type, design and/or orientation of the light source. These and other conditions can be defined as boundary parameters, and are taken into account by the computer program for the further calculation. The computer program is based on a predefined shape for a projection lens having a predefined surface contour for the light entry surface and the light exit surface. The computer program then determines discrete point values in accordance with the iterative procedure of the invention, which are those points at which the predefined lens needs to be deformed in order that the resulting light distribution is as close as possible to the predefined light distribution. Lastly, an interpolation can be made between the calculated discrete points of the lens surfaces, such that one obtains a close approximation of the form, or surface contour, respectively, for the light entry surface and/or the light exit surface, for a projection lens that is suited for generating the desired light distribution. 
     The calculation of the shape of the projection lens, or the contour of the lens surfaces, respectively, may include separate calculations for the desired light distribution in the vertical direction and for the desired light distribution in the horizontal direction, and can occur, in particular, successively. The surface contour for the projection lenses can be varied at the discrete points until the desired light distribution has been obtained to the greatest possible extent. The computer program executes an iterative procedure thereby, which is stopped when the actually obtained light distribution at a specific number of discrete points is as close as possible to the desired light distribution. If the stopping criterion is fulfilled, the method implemented with the computer program is stopped. The data calculated for the shape and/or the surface contour for the projection lens suited to generating a desired light distribution can be used directly for producing the lens, in that they are applied to a milling tool, for example, in order to mill the desired projection lens from a glass block. 
     In one embodiment of the method the invention, the quality of the light distribution may be determined with an optimization program. The optimization program advantageously uses a target function to describe the resulting light distribution that is to be obtained by the lens with the deformed surface, wherein it is attempted to minimize the target function with the deformation of the surfaces. Advantageously, the sum of least squares is used as the target function. In order to minimize the least squares, preferably the method of least squares is used. 
     In order to be able to determine the quality of the resulting light distribution in the framework of the automatically executed method, various approaches are conceivable. As one possible approach it is proposed that intensity values for the predefined light distribution, which is obtained with the lens having the deformed surfaces, are compared with one another in identical pixel grids for selected pixels, and the sums of least squares are calculated, in each case, from the square of the difference of the intensity values in a specific pixel. For selected pixels of the pixel grid, the intensity values are thus determined for the resulting light distribution and for the predefined light distribution, respectively. A difference of the intensity values in these pixels is calculated, and the square of the difference is formed. Based on the sum of the calculated squares for the selected pixels, the quality of the resulting light distribution can be determined automatically. In doing so, it is conceivable to weight the squares for different pixels differently. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       Other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood after reading the subsequent description taken in connection with the accompanying drawing wherein: 
         FIG. 1  shows a vertical cut through a projection lens known from the prior art for generating lowered light source images for a foreground illumination and/or lateral illumination in a light distribution. 
         FIG. 2  shows a light distribution obtained with the lens of  FIG. 1 . 
         FIG. 3  shows a vertical cut through a projection lens according to a first embodiment of the invention for generating small light source images for a maximum and a light/dark border in a low beam light distribution. 
         FIG. 4  shows a vertical cut through a projection lens according to a second embodiment of the invention for generating large light source images for a foreground illumination and/or lateral illumination in a light distribution. 
         FIG. 5  shows a vertical cut through a projection lens according to a third embodiment of the invention for generating light source images of different sizes. 
         FIG. 6  shows exemplary light source images generated with the lens of  FIG. 5 . 
         FIG. 7  shows a light distribution obtained with the lens of  FIG. 5  by superimposing the light source images of  FIG. 6 . 
         FIG. 8A  shows a specification for a light distribution in a vertical direction. 
         FIG. 8B  shows vertical cut through a projection lens of the invention designed for fulfilling the specification of  FIG. 8A . 
         FIG. 9  shows a vertical cut through a projection lens according to a fourth embodiment of the invention. 
         FIG. 10  shows a light distribution obtained with the lens of  FIG. 9 . 
         FIG. 11  shows a vertical cut through a projection lens according to a fifth embodiment of the invention, which results in a distortion of a light source in only the vertical direction. 
         FIG. 12  shows light source images generated by way of example with the lens of  FIG. 11 , distorted in only the vertical direction. 
         FIG. 13  shows a light distribution obtained with the lens of  FIG. 11  by superimposing the light source images of  FIG. 12 . 
         FIG. 14  shows a horizontal cut through a projection lens according to a sixth embodiment of the invention, which results in a distortion of a light source in only the horizontal direction. 
         FIG. 15  shows light source images generated with the lens of  FIG. 14 , distorted in only the horizontal direction. 
         FIG. 16  shows a light distribution obtained with the lens of  FIG. 14  by superimposing the light source images of  FIG. 15 . 
         FIG. 17  shows a perspective view of a projection lens according to a seventh embodiment of the invention, which results in a distortion of a light source in both a vertical direction as well as a horizontal direction. 
         FIG. 18  shows light source images generated in an exemplary manner with the lens of  FIG. 17 , distorted in both the vertical as well as horizontal direction. 
         FIG. 19  shows a light distribution obtained with the lens of  FIG. 17  by superimposing the light source images of  FIG. 18 . 
         FIG. 20  shows a light distribution that is obtained, starting from the light distribution of  FIG. 13 , by lowering the light source in relation to the projection lens of  FIG. 11 . 
         FIG. 21  shows a vertical cut through a known projection lens. 
         FIG. 22  shows conventional light source images generated with the known lens of  FIG. 21 . 
         FIG. 23  shows a conventional light distribution obtained with the known lens of  FIG. 21  by superimposing the light source images of  FIG. 22 . 
         FIG. 24  shows a perspective view of a known projection lens. 
         FIG. 25  shows conventional light source images generated with the known lens of  FIG. 24 . 
         FIG. 26  shows a conventional light distribution obtained with the known lens of  FIG. 25  by superimposing the light source images of  FIG. 25 . 
         FIG. 27  shows a motor vehicle headlamp according to the invention in accordance with one embodiment. 
         FIG. 28  shows a light distribution that can be obtained with a lens known from the prior art, in accordance with  FIG. 21 . 
         FIG. 29  shows a light distribution that can be obtained with a lens known from the prior art in accordance with  FIG. 1 . 
         FIG. 30  shows a light distribution that can be obtained with a lens according to the invention. 
         FIG. 31  shows an intensity in the far field region for a light distribution that can be obtained with a lens known from the prior art according to  FIG. 21 . 
         FIG. 32  shows an intensity in the far field region for a light distribution that can be obtained with a lens known from the prior art according to  FIG. 1 . 
         FIG. 33  shows an intensity in the far field region for a light distribution that can be obtained with a lens according to the invention. 
         FIG. 34  shows an intensity in the foreground for a light distribution that can be obtained with a lens known from the prior art according to  FIG. 21 . 
         FIG. 35  shows an intensity in the foreground for a light distribution that can be obtained with a lens known from the prior art according to  FIG. 1 . 
         FIG. 36  shows an intensity in the foreground for a light distribution that can be obtained with a lens according to the invention. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     A motor vehicle headlamp according to one embodiment of the invention is shown in  FIG. 27 . The headlamp is indicated as a whole by the reference numeral  1 . The headlamp  1  includes a housing  2 , preferably made of plastic. In a front section, when viewed in the light emission direction  3 , the housing  2  has a light exit aperture  4 , which is closed by a transparent cover plate  5 . The cover plate  5  can have optically effective elements (for example, prisms or cylindrical lenses) for diffusing the light beams passing through it, preferably in a horizontal direction (so-called diffusion disks). Preferably the cover plate  5 , however, is designed without optically effective elements (so-called clear disks). The cover plate  5  is made of a transparent glass or plastic material. 
     A light module is disposed in the interior of the headlamp housing  2 , indicated as a whole by the reference numeral  7 . The light module  7  includes a light source  8 , which can be designed as an incandescent lamp, a gas discharge lamp, or one or more light emitting diodes (LEDs). The light beams emitted from the light source  8  are bundled with a primary lens  9 , and basically deflected into the light emission direction  3 . The primary lens  9  is designed as a reflector in the depicted embodiment example. It is, however, conceivable that the primary lens  9  is designed as a TIR (total internal reflection) adapter lens. An adapter lens of this type consists of a transparent glass or plastic material. The light emitted from the light source  8  is coupled in the adapter lens, subjected to total internal reflection at the outer boundary surfaces of the adapter lens, and then passes out of the adapter lens. The bundling of the light beams is obtained with a TIR adapter lens with a refraction when entering the adapter lens, or when exiting the adapter lens, and/or with a total internal reflection at the boundary surfaces. 
     Furthermore, a projection lens  10  is disposed in the beam path of the bundled light beams, which projects the light passing through it for generating a desired light distribution on a road surface in front of a motor vehicle equipped with the headlamp  1 . The projection lens  10  is designed as a projection lens according to the invention, and will be explained in greater detail below. The light module  7  is also referred to as a projection module. It is disposed in the housing  2  such that it is stationary, or can be rotated about a horizontal and/or vertical axis. An optical axis for the projection module  7  is indicated by the reference numeral  11 . 
     Lenses  10  are placed in the projection modules  7 , which either reproduce a light distribution, which is generated with the reflector  9 , for example, in an intermediate plane in the distance, or form so-called direct imaging systems, with which the light source  8  (typically an LED) are imaged via the lens  10 , without the need for an additional optically active surface for bundling the light beams. 
     Direct imaging projection systems of this type generate light distributions with a suitable shape of the lens  10 , which exhibits a defined expansion in both the horizontal direction as well as the vertical direction. The projection lens  10  is designed such that it can generate—in interacting with the primary lens  9 —a light/dark border for a low beam light distribution, without an additional aperture assembly disposed in the beam path. 
     The light/dark border can run strictly along the horizontal in a symmetrical manner thereby, or it can be asymmetrical, for example, in accordance with ECE or SAE regulations. Known projection lenses are shaped such that one side of the lens is either planar, convex or concave in shape. 
       FIG. 21  shows a vertical cut through a conventional projection lens  20  known from the prior art, with the corresponding beam path for exemplary selected light beams. The vertical expansions, or divergences, of the light beams leaving the lens  20  are nearly the same size, independently of the exit point from the lens  20 . The light source images resulting therefrom, on a measurement screen  21  disposed at a spacing to a headlamp  1  equipped with the conventional projection lens  20 , are depicted by way of example in  FIG. 22 . Two orthogonal axes are drawn on the measurement screen  21 , a horizontal axis HH and a vertical axis VV. The axes HH, VV intersect at point HV. The optical axis  11  for the module  7  preferably runs through the point of intersection HV. The light source images  22 , which can be generated with the conventional projection lens  20 , differ slightly in shape, but their sizes are nearly identical. The light distribution  23  resulting on a measurement screen  21 , with a superimposing of the light source images  22 , is depicted in  FIG. 23 . 
     With respect to the beam paths of a known lens  20  of this type, the images  22  of the light source  8  all have a similar size on the measurement screen  21 . As a result, when generating a desired light distribution with the conventional projection module, there is no possibility for generating particularly small images  22  for the distance range, or relatively large images for the foreground illumination and lateral illumination. 
     Because the known projection lens  20  cannot generate small light source images  22 , it is only possible to obtain a foreground illumination by lowering the light source images  22 . This means that images  22  are displaced downward, from the light/dark border into the foreground. As a result, the distance range is reduced, and the gradient at the light/dark border is weakened. 
     A projection lens  20  known from the prior art is depicted in  FIG. 1 , the light exit surface  24  of which has been slightly modified, in a region  25 , in comparison with the conventional lens  20  of  FIG. 21 , in order to obtain the known effect of a lowering of the light source images  22  in order to illuminate the foreground. The lowered light beams are indicated by an arrow. The light distribution  23  for a projection lens  20  designed in this manner is shown in  FIG. 2 . The gradient at the light/dark border is weakened (the iso-lux lines at the upper side of the light distribution are not as densely packed together), and the light distribution  23  is lacking in terms of its distance range. 
     The present invention serves, in particular, for generating imaging systems, such as the projection module  7 , for example, having various imaging scales. Instead of an imaging lens  20  known from the prior art, a projection lens  10  according to the invention is used, which only images a small region in sharp focus, and images other regions in a diffused manner, due to imaging scales of different sizes. As a result, light source images of different sizes are available for generating a desired, predefined light distribution. In order to generate a maximum and a local gradient in the region of the light/dark border of the light distribution, small light source images are used substantially. These can concentrate light locally in a very precise manner. In order to generate uniformly illuminated regions in the light distribution, in particular in the foreground, or to the sides of the light distribution, relatively large light source images are used. With the present invention, it is then possible to design projection lenses such that small and large light source images can be generated with a single projection lens  10 . The present invention is based, in particular, on the consideration that a combination of light entry surfaces and light exit surfaces are present in a refractive body, which result in the light source images  22  appearing in different sizes on the measurement screen  21 . With the conventional design for a projection lens  20 , as depicted in  FIG. 21 , the light beams are propagated after exiting the lens with a divergence of nearly the same size. 
     A projection lens  10  according to a one embodiment of the present invention is depicted in  FIG. 3 . The depicted projection lens  10  is distinguished, in particular, in that it has, in the middle, meaning in the region of the optical axis  11  of the projection module  7 , a light entry surface  12  having a special design, and a light exit surface  13  having a corresponding design. In particular, the projection lens  10  is designed at the middle such that the light beams in the region of the optical axis  11  exit the lens  10  in nearly parallel beams. This results in comparably small light source images, which are particularly well suited for generating light concentrations for maximums and light/dark borders in the light distribution. This is achieved in the depicted embodiment example in that a local recess  14  is formed in the middle of the light entry surface  12 , and a local thickening  15  is formed in the middle of the light exit surface  13 . 
     Another embodiment of a projection lens  10  according to the invention is depicted in  FIG. 4 . The light entry surface  12  and the light exit surface  13  are designed thereby in a middle region of the lens  10 , meaning they are in the region of the optical axis  11 , such that the light beams in the middle exit the lens  10  strongly diverging. This leads to comparatively large light source images, which are particularly well suited for generating homogenous regions of the light distribution that are illuminated on a large scale for a foreground and/or lateral illumination. This is attained in the depicted embodiment example through a local thickening  16  of the light entry surface  12  and a corresponding local recess  17  in the light exit surface  13  in the middle of the projection lens  10 . 
     Despite the different designs of the lenses  10 ,  20  of  FIGS. 21, 3 and 4 , all three lenses generate a sharply focused horizontal light/dark border. Each of the beam bundles can be aligned such that the highest point of a light source image lies on, or very close to, the light/dark border. The projection lens  10  in the light module  7  according to the invention, however, has the advantage that different sized light source images  31  can be generated with it, which can be deflected for an optimization of the light distribution in the desired regions of the light distribution (small images close to the light/dark border, large images in the foreground or lateral regions of the light distribution). 
     Another embodiment of a projection lens  10  according to the invention is depicted in  FIG. 5 , wherein the variations in the light entry surface  12  and the light exit surface  13  are not depicted to scale, in order to more clearly illustrate the principle of the invention. A projection lens  10  is depicted in  FIG. 5  that generates a combination of strongly diverging and nearly parallel beams. The strongly diverging light beams are used thereby for generating larger light source images in the foreground or the lateral regions of a light distribution. The nearly parallel light beams are used, conversely, for generating relatively smaller light source images in the region of the light/dark border. 
     The light beams, diverging relatively strongly in comparison with a conventional projection lens  20 , basically in the middle of the projection lens  10 , are indicated with the reference numeral  18  in  FIG. 5 . Light beams that are concentrated relatively strongly in comparison with a conventional projection lens  20  at a spacing to the middle of the lens  10  are indicated by the reference numeral  19 . Light beams are illustrated at the outer edge of the projection lens  10 , the divergence of which basically corresponds to that of a conventional projection lens  20 . As can be clearly discerned in  FIG. 5 , the beam bundles for each light source image have different divergences. The light entry surface  12  and the light exit surface  13  also ensure in this case that each light source image, or the highest point of each light source image, respectively, lies directly on the light/dark border. 
     Light source images  30  generated with the lens  10  from  FIG. 5  are depicted in an exemplary manner in  FIG. 6  on a measurement screen  21 . The light source images  30  have not only different shapes, but they also have clearly different sizes. The corresponding light distribution  31 , which can be generated by superimposing the light source images  30  in  FIG. 6 , from the projection lens  10  in  FIG. 5 , is depicted in  FIG. 7 . As a result of all of the light source images  30 , or their highest point, respectively, lying directly beneath the light/dark border, and differ due to their expansion in the vertical direction; on one hand, a sharply light/dark border is generated, and on the other hand, a good foreground illumination is obtained. The focal point of the light remains in the proximity of the light/dark border thereby, as is desired. This results in a clearly better range for the light distribution  31 , while still obtaining a clearly better foreground illumination. 
     With the present invention, and taking as a basis the described considerations, it is possible to generate a projection lens  10  for generating a predefined light distribution  31 . Thus, a vertical course of the light distribution  31  on a measurement screen  31  is predefined, and the corresponding projection lens  10  is generated that images a light source  8  in a corresponding manner, such that the desired light distribution can be generated from light source images  30  of different sizes. The desired illumination E is depicted in relation to a vertical position on the measurement screen  21  in  FIG. 8A ). One possibility for a projection lens  10  obtained in this manner, for generating the predefined light distribution, is depicted in an exemplary manner in  FIG. 8B ). Here as well, the shape of the light entry surface  12  and the light exit surface  13  in the region of the local thickening and the local recess is not shown to scale, but instead, it is reproduced in an enlarged scale for purposes of illustration. 
     There are numerous different possibilities for the design of the light entry surface  12  and the light exit surface  13  of the projection lens  10 , for generating a desired light distribution. A further embodiment example of a projection lens  10  according to the invention, which in this case is designed such that it is asymmetrical in relation to the optical axis, wherein the light beams, which are more strongly concentrated after passing through the lens  10  than with a conventional projection lens  20 , are indicated by the reference numeral  19  in basically the middle of the projection lens  10 . Accordingly, those light beams that have a stronger divergence in comparison with a conventional lens  20  after passing through the lens  10  are indicated by the reference numeral  18 . The diverging light beams  18  are disposed at a spacing to the middle of the lens  10 , or to the more strongly concentrated light beams  19 , respectively. 
     A light distribution  31  obtained with the lens  10  in  FIG. 9  is depicted on a measurement screen  21  in  FIG. 10 . The distinguishing characteristic of all of the embodiments of a projection lens  10  according to the invention that are depicted and described herein is that light source images  30  can be generated locally in the various sub-regions of the light distribution  31 , the vertical expansions of which are clearly different, and the highest points of which lie in the close proximity of the light/dark border. 
     So far, only projection lenses have been depicted and described that have a light exit surface  13  that appears to be curved in the vertical direction, and is nearly flat in the horizontal direction. However, it is possible to design surfaces  12 ,  13  such that curvatures occur in both the vertical as well as horizontal directions of the light exit surface  13 . One example of such a projection lens  10  is shown in  FIG. 11 . In this case, different lens sections are disposed, distributed over the entire lens  10 , each of which has a different imaging scale. The entire lens  10  shown in  FIG. 11  only distorts the light source  8  in the vertical direction. The light source images  30  generated with the lens  10  from  FIG. 11 , distorted only in the vertical direction, are depicted on a measurement screen  21  in  FIG. 12 . The corresponding resulting light distribution  31  on the measurement screen  21 , obtained from a superimposing of the images  30  from  FIG. 12 , is shown in  FIG. 13 . 
     An imaging projection lens  10  is depicted in a horizontal cut in  FIG. 14 , which distorts a light source  8  in only the horizontal direction. Here as well, the strongly diverging light beams are indicated by the reference numeral  18 , and the concentrated light beams are indicated by the reference numeral  19 . The light source images  31  generated with the lens  10  from  FIG. 14 , distorted only in the horizontal direction on a measurement screen  21 , are shown in an exemplary manner in  FIG. 15 . The corresponding resulting light distribution  31  on a measurement screen  21  is shown in  FIG. 16 . In this way, the projection lens  10  from  FIG. 14  generates, aside from a light/dark border having high gradients, a horizontal expansion (lateral diffusion) of the light distribution  31  as well. As with the vertical expansion of the light distribution  31  via light source images  30  of different sizes (compare  FIG. 12 ), all of the light source images, or their highest points, lie on the light/dark border with the horizontal distortion in  FIG. 15 , and contribute to the maximum in the horizontal middle of the light distribution. If light source images for the lateral diffusion were displaced laterally, as is the case with conventional systems, they would not be able to contribute to the middle of the light distribution. 
     By way of example, an imaging lens  10  is shown in a perspective view in  FIG. 17 , which distorts a light source  8  in both the vertical as well as horizontal direction. For this, a local recess  14  is formed on the light exit side  13  of the lens  10 , basically in the middle. The light source images  30 , distorted in both the vertical as well as horizontal directions, which are generated with the lens  10  on a measurement screen  21 , are shown in  FIG. 18 . The corresponding light distribution  31 , which is obtained with the lens  10  from  FIG. 17  by superimposing the light source images  30  according to  FIG. 18 , is depicted on a measurement screen  21  in  FIG. 19 . 
     As a comparison to the projection lens  10  according to the invention, from  FIG. 17 , to the corresponding light source images  30  from  FIG. 18 , and to the corresponding, resulting light distribution  31  from  FIG. 19 , the conventional light source images  22  generated with the known lens  20  from  FIG. 24  are depicted in  FIG. 25 , and the conventional light distribution  23  obtained with the known lens  20  from  FIG. 24  by superimposing the light source images  22  according to  FIG. 25  is depicted in  FIG. 26 . The different light source images  22  from the conventional lens  20  are all nearly the same size. Accordingly, the resulting, conventional light distribution  23  lacks a strongly pronounced intensity gradient in the region of the light/dark border, as well as a sufficient foreground and lateral illumination. The light distribution  23  has an extension in the vertical direction of only about 0° to −3° (lacking foreground illumination), and an extension in the horizontal direction of about −4° to +4° (lacking lateral illumination). 
     The possibility of distorting light source images  30  in both the horizontal direction and the vertical direction, meaning to enlarge or to reduce said images, enables the projection lens  10  according to the invention to fulfill, accordingly, the requirements for the desired light distribution  31 . Large light source images  30  are used for the foreground and/or lateral diffusion, and small light source images are used for the core of the light distribution in the proximity of the light/dark border. 
     Because the different sized light source images  30  react differently to the transformations of the light source  8 , this behavior can also be used for implementing variable light distributions  31 . In this regard, reference is again made to  FIG. 13 , where a light distribution  31  for a low beam light with a horizontal light/dark border is depicted. The corresponding light distribution for a high beam is shown in  FIG. 20 , wherein the light source  8  is only moved downward, substantially perpendicular to the optical axis, in relation to the projection lens  20 . The light distribution changes very little at the core when switching between the low beam (compare  FIG. 13 ) and high beam (compare  FIG. 20 ). It is raised only slightly toward the horizon, this being entirely desirable. The foreground region, which is generated with large light source images  30 , is significantly raised in contrast. This is due, in particular, to the different imaging scales. If all of the light source images  30  had a similar size, they would clearly move in a similar manner with a change in position of the light source  8 . 
     The projection lenses  10  according to the invention, for generating different sized light source images  30 , offer the possibility, through the relative movement of the optical elements in relation to one another, of not only displacing the light distribution  31 , but also of changing its shape in a fundamental manner. This would be desirable, for example, in switching from a low beam light distribution to a high beam light distribution (so-called bi-functional). In doing so, the light source images  30  would be moved up or down to differing extents with a relative upward or downward movement of the light source  8 . This is used to move the core light distribution slightly upward (from just below the light/dark border) (compare  FIG. 13 ) toward the horizon (compare  FIG. 20 ), when switching the light distribution  31  from low beam to high beam, and to move the larger light source images  30  upward (from the near foreground to a region at and above the horizon), which is advantageous with respect to the line of sight for the driver. With a low beam, the main interest of the driver is in the illumination of the foreground, to as far as the light/dark border, while with the high beam, the driver also wants overhead signs or suchlike, lying clearly above the horizon, to be illuminated and discerned. 
     Further possible designs for the present invention are the following: Instead of a light source  8 , a decoupling surface of a light conducting element (optical waveguide, adapter lens, etc.) can also be used; to addition to the light source  8 , one or more shading elements (for example, an aperture assembly) can be placed at the focal point of the projection lens  10 , which make it possible to increase the gradients of the light distribution in the region of the light/dark border; Instead of a light source  8 , a light distribution from another optical system (for example, a reflector, optionally equipped with an aperture assembly) can also be used. The different imaging scales can be used for modifying the light distribution  31 , for example, for diffusing the foreground light, or for more strongly concentrating the light locally; Instead of a straight horizontal light/dark border, as a matter of course, light/dark borders can also be generated that are curved, and/or run at a diagonal (for example, a 15% rise with the low beam). Light/dark borders of this type preferably fulfill the requirements of the ECE and/or SAE regulations; Instead of placing all of the light source images  30  directly on the light/dark border, it would also be possible to locally displace some light source images  30  vertically and/or horizontally. A vertical displacement would make sense with conventional reflection systems, in order to be able to better control tolerances in the light source  8  with respect to their position in relation to the projection lens  10 , with respect to their design, or similar aspects, such that the tolerances do not result in an unacceptable light distribution  31 , because, for example, the intensity values above the light/dark border are too high; Instead of a smooth light exit surface  13  on the lens  10 , it would also be possible to provide the lens  10  with local structuring, which soften the light/dark border, meaning that they result in a less sharply focused light/dark border. Further, instead of a light distribution  31  having a light/dark border, the projection lens according to the invention enables generation of a light distribution that does not have a light/dark border (for example, a high beam light distribution). The different sized light source images  30  are also very well suited for generating high beam light distributions. Thus, the characteristic of the light distribution can be varied in a targeted manner. Light source images of the same size would generate a substantially constant, homogenous light distribution. If one has small and large images available, one can use the small images for generating a pronounced “pointed” maximum in a desired region of the light distribution; Instead of a light distribution  31  having a light/dark border, it is also possible to generate a light distribution that has no light/dark border. The different light source images  30  are also well suited for generating light distributions for signal functions (for example, blinkers, navigation light, parking light, tail light, daytime running lights, etc.). It is possible that a lens  10  of this type emits light in a desired direction from all regions of the light exit surface  13 , leading to a particularly homogenous appearance from this direction; Instead of moving the light source  8  with the so-called bi-function, it would also be possible to dispose one or more additional light sources at different positions in the light module  7 , and to switch these on and/or off in a targeted manner. Thus, the present invention describes projection lenses  10 , which can generate different sized light source images  30  with a special design of the light entry surface  12  and/or the light exit surface  13 . These light source images  30  can be placed inside the light distribution at nearly any location, depending on the desired objective. 
     A conventional projection lens  20 , as depicted, for example, in  FIG. 21 , has the disadvantage that foreground and/or lateral regions of the light distribution  23  (compare  FIG. 23 ) are only insufficiently illuminated, because they generate light source images  22  of similar sizes (compare  FIG. 22 ), and all of the light source images  22  are positioned just below the light/dark border. With a projection lens  20  likewise known from the prior art, as depicted, by way of example, in  FIG. 1 , the light source images of similar sizes are lowered in the middle of the light distribution  23  (compare  FIG. 2 ), basically in the region of the vertical axis VV on the measurement screen, in order to be able to better illuminate the foreground of the light distribution  23 . The lowered light source images are lacking, however, for the generation of the light/dark border, which is relatively diffused, and does not have the frequently required sharpness (larger gradient of the light intensity). 
     With the projection lens  10  according to the invention, the foreground (and/or lateral regions of the light distribution) can be satisfactorily illuminated, and a sharp light/dark border can also be generated. This is enabled in that at least some of the light source images  30  are enlarged with a modification of the imaging scale of the lens  10  in sections, such that, although the larger light source images  30  can still be directed at their uppermost points to close to the light/dark border, they extend in their lower regions, however, so far into the foreground of the light distribution  31  (and/or lateral regions of the light distribution), that they can illuminate the foreground and/or lateral regions well. 
     In the following, the substantial advantages and features of the projection lens  10  according to the invention are explained again, based on  FIGS. 28-30 , with a comparison of different light distributions.  FIG. 28  shows a light distribution  23  that can be obtained with a lens  20  known from the prior art, in accordance with  FIG. 21 . This has a very good range, as illustrated by that the focal point of the light  23 * lies far in front of the vehicle, i.e. close to the light/dark border. The corresponding intensity distribution for a distance of 20-50 meters in front of the vehicle is depicted in  FIG. 31 . On the other hand, the light distribution  23  in  FIG. 28  provides only a limited foreground illumination, in that the light distribution  23  reaches to the ground at only about 6 meters from the vehicle. The corresponding intensity distribution for a distance of 0-10 meters in front of the vehicle is depicted in  FIG. 34 . 
       FIG. 29  shows a light distribution  23  that can be obtained with a lens  20  known from the prior art in accordance with  FIG. 1 , in that the focal point  23 * of the light lies relatively close in front of the vehicle, i.e. well beneath the light/dark border. The corresponding intensity distribution for a distance of 20-50 meters in front of the vehicle is depicted in  FIG. 32 . On the other hand, the light distribution  23  from  FIG. 29  provides a very good foreground illumination, in that the light distribution  23  reaches to the ground at about 4 meters from the vehicle. The corresponding intensity distribution for a distance of 0-10 meters in front of the vehicle is depicted in  FIG. 35 . 
       FIG. 30  shows a light distribution  31  that can be obtained with a lens  10  according to the invention. This has a very good range, in that the focal point  31 * of the light lies far in front of the vehicle, i.e. close to the light/dark border. The corresponding intensity distribution for a distance of 20-50 meters in front of the vehicle is depicted in  FIG. 33 . Furthermore, the light distribution  31  from  FIG. 30  provides a good foreground illumination, in that the light distribution  31  reaches to the ground at less than 4 meters from the vehicle. The corresponding intensity distribution for a distance of 0-10 meters in front of the vehicle is depicted in  FIG. 36 . 
     The invention has been described in an illustrative manner. It is to be understood that the terminology which has been used is intended to be in the nature of words of description rather than of limitation. Many modifications and variations of the invention are possible in light of the above teachings. Therefore, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described.