Abstract:
A touchless car wash composition, that can be made from a concentrate and diluted to use concentration using commonly available service water can comprise an ether amine or diamine in particular a fatty ether amine or diamine. The novel compositions are typically free of hydrocarbon solvents and silicone materials that are common in prior art compositions. The compositions are used in touchless car wash processes in which the materials are sprayed in the form of an aqueous dilute solution to remove soil from the vehicle surface. The aqueous compositions are self removing and very small amounts of the aqueous solutions remain to create water spotting on cleaned vehicle surfaces. The novel compositions of the invention can also contain a variety of other ingredients in a fully formulated system. Such ingredients include rapid dewatering of painted surfaces, improved cleanliness of glass and painted surfaces. A substantial reduction of water spotting and concentrates stability. When used in systems using the direct contact between a brush, the friction between the brush and the vehicle surface is substantially reduced.

Description:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
     This invention relates to aqueous compositions that can be used in washing, rinsing or dewatering of vehicle surfaces. Such surfaces can be made of glass, rubber, painted surfaces, steel and aluminum wheels, plastic panels, thermoplastic/fabric or thermoplastic/fiber composite panels, plastic lenses and a variety of glass or metal composites and plastic trim pieces. The compositions of the invention are typically sprayed or wiped onto a vehicle surface for the purpose of removing a variety of soils common in the transportation, railway, airport, highway, etc. environment. Such soils are derived from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic and other functional fluids, dirt and grime, vehicle exhaust components, residue from prior cleaners, waxes, etc. Preferably, the compositions of the invention are used in either brushed, fabric contact or touchless systems. Such touchless systems involve a simple spray-on of the aqueous systems followed by an aqueous rinse leaving a clean vehicle surface, the surface comprising little or no residual cleaning composition or rinse. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     Soiled vehicle surfaces have been cleaned for many years using a variety of compositions and methods. Such compositions can be as simple as solutions of organic dish soaps or common all-purpose utility cleaners. In commercial or industrial vehicle cleaning such as semi-automatic and completely automatic car washes, a variety of cleaning materials have been used in a cleaning system that can often contain a pre-rinse or pre-cleaning step, a cleaning step followed by a combination of one or more steps using waxes, rinses, anti-rust agents, mechanical dryers, etc. Such vehicle cleaning operations can be embodied in a retail cleaning operations designed for cleaning vehicles by personal owners or by car wash personnel. Such cleaning stations can also include stations operated by car rental agencies, retail car dealerships, automobile fleet operators, bus sheds, train depots, airplane maintenance buildings, etc. 
     One class of commonly available automotive cleaning materials contain a variety of anionic surfactants that is used in conjunction with compatible nonionic surfactants, sequestrants, waxes and other ingredients. 
     Hydrocarbon wax compositions, applied after the aforementioned cleaning step, promote a shiny finish and are blended to promote removal of water from the vehicle surfaces. Such waxes also often contain a wax with anionic or nonionic surfactants, anti-rust agents and other components that form a fully functional system that can dewater automobiles leaving a dry shiny finish. 
     A second class of waxing composition is commonly available including a typical formulation containing surfactants, solvents and a silicone wax-like material that forms a shiny surface. Silicones are well known, very hydrophobic materials that when used in vehicle waxing compositions with other components such as nonionic detergents, anti-rust agents, etc. to form a shiny, dry vehicle surface. 
     One common theme in the prior art cleaning compositions is an anionic material (typically a sulfonate or sulfate surfactant), while the prior art waxing compositions require hydrocarbon or silicone wax materials. 
     Amine compounds have also been commonly formulated in hydrocarbon containing and silicone containing wax compositions and compositions that contain both hydrocarbons and silicants. For example, Chestochowski et al., U.S. Pat. No. 3,440,063 teaches fatty amine-organic acid salts in car wash formulations. Baker et al., U.S. Pat. No. 3,592,669 discloses a hydrocarbon wax composition containing a fatty alkyl amine in a transparent film forming composition. Cifuentes et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,258,063 discloses a gloss improving foam for use on vehicle surfaces. The film combines waxes with an alkyl cyclohexyl amine. Herring, GB 1,349,447 discloses a car polish composition comprising a paraffin wax combined with an alkyl diamine. Lastly, ABE, WO 92-22632 discloses a water repellent car window washing composition using a fatty amine acetate salt in combination with a hydrocarbon solvent and silicone wax in a complex formula containing a fluorocarbon active material. Fatty alkyl amines typically have the formula R-NH 2  wherein R is a hydrocarbon group that can have 1-3 unsaturated bonds but contain 6-24 straight chain carbon atoms. 
     Eriksson, WO 92-08823 discloses cleaning and degreasing agent containing an ethoxylated alkyl amine. Eriksson, EP 43360 teaches a metal corrosion protector comprising an ethoxylated amine composition. Lemin et al., GB 2,036,783 discloses a water repellent foam using a cationic dewatering agent comprising an ethoxylated amine that can also use an optional anti-static agent. Fatty ethanol amine amide compounds have been disclosed in, for example, in Bayless, U.S. Pat. No. 5,330,673 for use in adhesives and cleaners. Further, JP 06-145603 teaches a dewatering film form using triethanolamine and a hydrocarbon wax or silicone wax. JP 05-156289 teaches a vehicle cleaner containing short chain water soluble amines. Lastly, JP 03-024200 teaches a detergent for soil removal on vehicles using a short chain aqueous or nonaqueous amine. 
     Fox, U.S. Pat. No. 4,284,435 teach a car wash composition using an ethoxylated quaternary amine composition. Karalis et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,864,060 teaches a car wash composition combining a quaternary ammonium compound and an amine oxide material. Betty, Jr. et al., U.S. Pat. No. 3,756,835 teaches an auto polish that combine a quaternary ammonium compound and an ethoxylated amine and a petroleum mineral oil. Tarr, U.S. Pat. No. 5,221,329 teaches a water repellent material used as a coating for aircraft comprising a quaternary ammonium compound and a saline compound. JP 03-262763 and JP 58-076477 disclose car wash compositions and anti-spotting coating compositions that can contain quaternary amine materials in combination with additives such as waxes, cationic surfactants, etc. 
     These prior art vehicle cleaning materials have had some success in the marketplace. However, the marketplace continually searches for materials having improved properties. Properties that can always use improvement include the gloss of the cleaned vehicle surface, the rate and amount of dewatering, water spotting on glass or painted surfaces, concentrate stability, solution clarity and overall ease of preparing aqueous dilutions from the aqueous concentrate materials. The marketplace has continually searched for improvements in aqueous systems containing organic cleaner materials that can have improved soil removal, improved gloss in the final vehicle surface, reduced spotting and improved dewatering. Lastly, the environmental compatibility of the hydrocarbon and silicone wax-like materials has been questioned in recent years. A substantial need exists to develop vehicle cleaners and rinses that can clean and shine with minimal aqueous residue in touchless or cloth or brush systems. 
     BRIEF DISCUSSION OF THE INVENTION 
     We have found that silicone and hydrocarbon wax-like materials can be substantially avoided in vehicle maintenance cleaning, drying or dewatering compositions if a fatty alkyl ether amine is used. We have found that in the conventional vehicle cleaning compositions conventional wax-like materials can be replaced in an aqueous cleaner, dewatering or drying agents by an alkyl ether amine or alkyl ether diamine of the formula 
     
         R--O--(R.sub.2).sub.n --NH--A 
    
     
         A═R.sub.3 NH.sub.2 or H 
    
     R 2 , R 3  =linear or branched alkyl 
     The ether amine and diamine compositions of the invention are typically formulated in liquid or solid aqueous concentrate materials in which the ether amine or diamine is combined with other compatible cleaning agents in a compatible aqueous concentrate that can be diluted with service water to form a material that can be readily applied (i.e.) sprayed onto a vehicle surface for the purpose of cleaning the vehicle surface leaving the vehicle with a shiny, glossy finish and with a minimum of water spotting or streaking. The amine is made compatable in the compositions of the invention using a stabilizing agent comprising a neutralizing acid or a nonionic surfactant. The stabilizing agent produces single phase ether amine compositions which can be clear solutions. A listing of the typical amine compounds used in the current art are shown in Table 11 (pages 38-39). In contrast to the prior art, anionic surfactants such as sulfates or sulfonates are not preferred and compositions of the invention are substantially free of amine reacting anionic materials. Such acid anionic materials like alkyl benzene sulfonates, alpha olefin sulfonates, and alcohol sulfates are believed to react with, neutralize and reduce the activity of the fatty amines of the invention. 
     For the purpose of this patent application, the term &#34;vehicle&#34; is intended to mean any transportation conveyance including automobiles, trucks, sport utility vehicles, buses, golf carts, motorcycles, monorails, diesel locomotives, passenger coaches, small single engine private airplanes, corporate jet aircraft, commercial airline equipment, etc. The term &#34;touchless cleaning system&#34; is directed to processes in which the cleaning materials are directly contacted with a vehicle surface comprising a painted surface, a thermal plastic composite surface, a glass surface, a rubber surface, or surfaces containing common automobile trim units for soil removal with a spray or flood with no added mechanical action used in soil removal. A &#34;dewatering agent&#34; promotes rapid and substantially complete drainage of aqueous residue on a vehicle surface. In use, an aqueous cleaner composition can be permitted to remain in contact with such surfaces for a relatively short period of time (less than 5 minutes) to promote soil removal. The aqueous systems are typically removed from the vehicle surface using an aqueous rinse followed by a dewatering agent. The term &#34;hydrocarbon free wax&#34; is intended to convey the concept that the materials of the invention do not contain a substantial proportion of any hydrocarbon that can participate in either soil removal, dewatering or providing a shiny coating to a vehicle painted surface. The term &#34;silicone-free&#34; is intended to convey the concept that the compositions of the invention are substantially free of silicone materials at concentrations typically available for the purpose of promoting a shiny surface, dewatering, water removal or spot or streak prevention. Trivial amounts of wax or silicone can be added within the scope of the invention. The term &#34;anti-soiling&#34; is intended to convey the concept that the materials of this invention aid in eliminating or repelling hard-surface water spots caused by soluble solids in rinse waters. 
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     The vehicle cleaning compositions of the invention can be formulated in a variety of formats. The drying agent simply promotes dewatering of a vehicle surface. The composition can also take the form of a car wash cleaner composition that is formulated simply to be a soil removing agent that after removal of the cleaner leaves a shiny surface that can be dried to an attractive finish. The materials can also be prepared as a car wash formulation that can wash, dry and leave a shiny, dry surface. Basic formulations, which can be used in liquid or solid form, are found in the wax and silicone free formulas set forth below: 
     
         ______________________________________         Wt %      Preferred Wt %______________________________________CARWASHAlkyl ether amine           1-55        2-8Nonionic Surfactant           1-55        5-15Amine oxide     0-25        5-15Sequestrant     1-10        5-10Base or Acid    Adj to desired pHWater           BalanceDRYING AGENTNEUTRAL AGENT (SOLUTION PHASE)Alkyl ether amine           1-55        5-15Nonionic Surfactant           0-20 can be used                       1-7           0.1-20 is usefulAcid            To desired pH or           solution clarityWater and/or    BalancesolventNON-NEUTRALIZED AGENT (EMULSIFIED.sup.1 PHASE)Alkyl ether amine           1-50        5-15Nonionic (or blended           1-20        3-10nonionic) SurfactantWater and/or solvent           BalanceWASH AND DRY CAR WASH FORMULAAlkyl ether amine           0.1-50      2-10Nonionic Surfactant           1-20        5-15Fatty amine ethoxylate           0-20        1-10Alkyl dimethyl amine-oxide           0.1-20      5-15Sequestrant     0.5-20      5-10Solvent (glycol ether)           1-15        2-10Base (pH adjustment)           0.1-5       1-3Silicate (aluminum           0.1-5       0.5-3protection)Solidification agent           Optional    0.1-30.sup.2Water           Balance     Balance______________________________________ .sup.1 Amine in water, dispersed amine in continuous aqueous phase. .sup.2 Solidification agent is used only if solid formulation is needed. 
    
     In general, the formulations can be liquid or solid and can contain the fatty ether amine compositions of the invention in combination with a variety of other materials useful in the manufacture of vehicle cleaning and dewatering agents including nonionic surfactants, amine oxide surfactants, sequestrants, acidic materials, basic materials, solvents, and a variety of other useful materials such as dyes, fragrances, thickening agents, foaming surfactants and others. Conventional hardeneing or solidification agents can be used including urea, PEG materials, nonionics, etc. 
     The vehicle maintenance compositions of the invention can contain a fatty ether amine compound of the formula: 
     
         R--O--(R.sub.2).sub.n --NH--A 
    
     
         A═R.sub.3 NH.sub.2 or H 
    
     R 2 , R 3  =linear or branched alkyl 
     Preferred amines include tetradecyloxypropyl-1,3-diaminopropane; a C 12-14  alkyl oxypropyl-1,3-diaminopropane; a C 12-15  alkyloxypropyl amine and other similar materials that can be obtained in the market place under the tradename of TOMAH® DA19, DA18, DA17, DA1618, DA14, PA19, PA17, PA16, PA14, PA1214, etc. 
     Nonionic surfactants useful in cleaning compositions, include those having a polyalkylene oxide polymer as a portion of the surfactant molecule. Such nonionic surfactants include, for example, chlorine-, benzyl-, methyl-, ethyl-, propyl-, butyl- and other like alkyl-capped polyethylene glycol ethers of fatty alcohols; polyalkylene oxide free nonionics such as alkyl polyglycosides; sorbitan and sucrose esters and their ethoxylates; alkoxylated ethylene diamine; alcohol alkoxylates such as alcohol ethoxylate propoxylates, alcohol propoxylates, alcohol propoxylate ethoxylate propoxylates, alcohol ethoxylate butoxylates, and the like; dodecyl, octyl or nonylphenol ethoxylates, polyoxyethylene glycol ethers and the like; carboxylic acid esters such as glycerol esters, polyoxyethylene esters, ethoxylated and glycol esters of fatty acids, and the like; carboxylic amides such as diethanolamine condensates, monoalkanolamine condensates, polyoxyethylene fatty acid amides, and the like; and polyalkylene oxide block copolymers including an ethylene oxide/propylene oxide block copolymer such as those commercially available under the trademark PLURONIC™ (BASF-Wyandotte), and the like; and other like nonionic compounds. Silicone containing nonionic surfactants such as the ABIL B8852 or Silwet 7602 can also be used. The following materials are particularly preferred: fatty amines (coco, tallow, etc. amines) ethoxylated with 2 to 18 moles of ethylene oxide (EO), substituted amines of the formula: R 1  --O--R 2  --NH--R 2  --NH 2 , or ethoxylated species thereof, wherein R 1  is a fatty group, each R 2  is independently a C 1-6  alkylene; a poloxamine, an (EO) x  (PO) y  --NH--R 2  --NH 2 , wherein R 2  is a C 1-6  alkylene group; C 9-14  alcohol ethoxylated with 3 to 10 moles of ethylene oxide (EO), coco alcohol ethoxylated with 3 to 10 moles EO, stearyl alcohol ethoxylated with 5 to 10 moles EO, mixed C 12  -C 15  alcohol ethoxylated with 3 to 10 moles EO, mixed secondary C 11  -C 15  alcohol ethoxylated with 3 to 10 moles EO, mixed C 9  -C 11  linear alcohol ethoxylated with 3 to 10 moles EO and the like. It is preferred that the nonionic have from 8 to 12 carbon atoms in the alkyl group. When this preferred alkyl group is used the most preferred nonionic is the mixed C 9  -C 11  alcohol ethoxylated with 3-7 moles EO. 
     An important nonionic surfactant can comprise an amine oxide. Such materials are made by oxidizing a t-alkyl amine to an amine oxide. Preferred amine oxides are typically C 6-28  alkyl dimethylamine oxides. Representative examples of such amine oxides are lauryl dimethylamine oxide, dodecyl dimethylamine oxide, tetradecyl dimethylamine oxide, cetyl dimethylamine oxide, stearyl dimethylamine oxide, dodecyl diethylamine oxide, bis(2-hydroxypropyl)tetradecylamine oxide, etc. 
     Typical aqueous compositions combined with service water can contain the sequestrant to reduce the undesirable effects of typically di- and trivalent metal cations. Such cations can reduce the effect of a variety of the organic components of the formulations of the invention and can promote water spotting. Suitable chelating agents include both inorganic and organic chelating agents. Inorganic silicates, carbonates, phosphates, and borates are examples. Organic chelating agents include trisodium nitrilotriacetate, trisodium hydroxyethylethylenediamine triacetate, tetrasodium ethylenediamine tetraacetate, polyacrylic acid sodium salts and other sequestering or chelating agents well known in the industry. 
     The compositions of the invention can contain an acidic or basic material that can act to neutralize either a basic or acidic pH, respectively. Such basic materials include amines, sodium hydroxide, sodium silicate materials, etc. These materials can act as an alkaline builder, soil disbursement and buffering agent. The preferred silicate materials also act as an aluminum protectant that can reduce the impact of the chemicals of the invention on exposed aluminum surfaces. The alkaline builder material should be present in amounts sufficient to obtain a pH approximately neutral (i.e., about 6 to 10, preferably 6-9). A variety of typically weak or mild acids can be used to neutralize and solubilize the basic compositions to a variety of pH&#39;s. Such acids include acetic acid, hydroxyacetic acid, phosphoric acid, citric acid, and other typical acids used in the manufacture of cleaning compositions. 
     The formulations of the invention can contain a solvent material. The preferred chemistry requires no solvent. Preferred solvents comprise alcohols, glycols, glycol ether materials. Such materials tend to have aliphatic moieties containing 2 to 6 carbon atoms. Examples of such materials include ethanol, propanol, isopropanol, butanol, 2-butanol, 2-methyl-2-propanol, butoxy diglycol, ethoxy diglycol, polypropylene glycol, ethylene glycol methyl ether, ethylene glycol dimethyl ether, propylene glycol methyl ether, dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether, butoxy ethanol, phenoxy ethanol, methoxy propanol, propylene glycol, n-butyl ether, tripropylene glycol, n-butyl ether, propylene glycol, hexylene glycol and other similar oxygenated solvents. 
    
    
     EXAMPLE 1 
     Touchless Vehicle Wash Test 1 
     A series of &#34;touchless&#34; car washes were made, with and without an alkyl-ether diamine to test for detergency and dewatering effects. The test was done using a 1 wt % dilution of the footnoted formulas. The material was applied by (i) a low-pressure spray application of 100 ml of the diluted test solution to a 16 ft 2  side panel on a white 1994 Dodge Caravan, (ii) allowing a 30 second wait time, and (iii) finally a high (600 psi) pressure water rinse using approximately 0.5 gallon of well water. 
     Table 1 illustrates the improved painted surface dewatering effects when using the fatty ether amine, while also yielding good detergency. The panels were evaluated with a gloss meter for gloss, and visually for dewatering. The % gloss reading is a relative reference scale of black equals 0% and white equals 100% with cleaning enhancement indicated by an increased value; i.e., usually soiled surfaces are in the range of about 50-70% gloss while cleaned surfaces being about 90-110% gloss. Mirrored surfaces can be greater than 100%. 
     
                       TABLE 1______________________________________Touchless Car Formula Tests Using An AlkylEther Diamine               Vehicle Surface                           Painted Surface               Final Gloss 50% DewateringRun # Detergent Formulas.sup.3               Reading.sup.4                           Rate (min:sec).sup.5______________________________________1     alkyl-ether-diamino               98%         0:09 formula D.sup.62     alkyl-ether-diamine               101%        0:05 formula C.sup.73     alkyl-ether-diamine               .sup. 91%.sup.9                           0:15 formula B.sup.84     conventional (non-               96%         .sup. 2:26.sup.11 amine) formula.sup.10______________________________________ .sup.3 The footnoted detergent concentrates were made as listed, but used as 1.0 wt % dilutions. .sup.4 Gloss increase measured with a handheld gloss meter; measuring the surface gloss after cleaning in 5 areas of the vehicles driver side surface (an avg. of 6 gloss measurements per area). The final gloss readings were after 5 minutes of drying. .sup.5 Dewatering rate = visual evaluation time for 50% of the water to drain from the surface. .sup.6 Formula D = 2.7% cocoamine 15 mole ethoxylate (Varonic K215), 14% Na HEDTA (Versonol 120), 3.0% C.sub.12-14 linear alkyloxypropyl-1,3-diamino propane (Tomah DA1618), 3.2% C.sub.12 alkyl dimethyl amine oxide, 10.0% nonionic surfactants, 0.25% NaOH, and the remainder as water. .sup.7 Formula C = 3.0% Varonic K215, 14% Versonol 120, 5.0% Tomah DA1618 4.0% amine oxide, 10.0% Dowanol glycols, 0.25% NaOH, and the remainder as water. .sup.8 Formula B = 3.5% Varonic K215, 14% Versonol 120, 5.0% Tomah DA1618 3.2% amine oxide, 11.0% nonionic surfactants, 2.5% Dowanol glycols, 0.25% NaOH, and the remainder as water. .sup.9 Incomplete cleaning was noted with this formula. .sup.10 Conventional formula = 4.5% potassium pyrophosphate TKPP, 9.25% LAS linear alkane sulfonate acid, 2.24% alphaolefin sulfonate (AOS), 8% Dowanol glycols, 1.13% NaOH, and the remainder as fragrance/water. .sup.11 The water actually began to dry before dewatering so the time indicated is for 50% removal by either route. 
    
     EXAMPLE 2 
     Touchless Vehicle Wash Test 2 
     A &#34;touchless&#34; car washes was made, with and without a fatty alkyl-ether monoamine to test for detergency and even better dewatering effects vs. Example 1. The test was done using a 1 wt % dilution of the footnoted formulas, (i) a low-pressure spray application of 100 ml of the diluted test solution was made to a 16 ft 2  side panel on a white 1994 Dodge Caravan, (ii) then allowing a 30 second wait time, and (iii) finally a high (600 psi) pressure water rinse using approximately 0.5 gallon of well water. 
     Table 2 illustrates the improved dewatering effects when using the amine vs. a conventional detergent. Better results for the primary vs. ether diamine are also shown. The panels were evaluated with a gloss meter for gloss, and visually for dewatering. The relative % gloss values shows both amine formulas (runs 1 and 2) to yield gloss values greater than the conventional formula (run 3); and that the amine can impart a &#34;shine&#34; to the surface that enhances the surface gloss to &gt;100% values. 
     
                       TABLE 2______________________________________Touchless Car Formula Tests Using Alkyl EtherDiamines and Monoamines             Alkyl    Vehicle  50% Detergent   Ether    Surface Final                               DewateringRun # Formulas.sup.1             Amine    Gloss Reading.sup.2                               Rate (min:sec).sup.3______________________________________1     fatty alkyl-ether             Tomah    111%     0:11 diamine     DA-1618 formula D.sup.42     fatty alkyl-ether             Tomah    110%     0:03 monoamine   PA-19 formula D.sup.53     conventional             none      96%     &gt;3.00.sup.7 (non-amine) formula.sup.6______________________________________ .sup.1 The footnoted detergent concentrates were made as listed, but used as 1.0 wt % dilutions. .sup.2 Gloss increase measured with a handheld gloss meter; measuring the surface gloss after cleaning in 3 areas of the vehicles driver side surface (an avg. of 6 gloss measurements per area). The gloss readings were after 5 min. of drying time. .sup.3 Dewatering rate = visual evaluation time for 50% of the water to drain from the surface. .sup.4 Formula D diamine = 2.7% Varonic K215, 14% Versonol 120, 3.0% Toma DA1618, 3.2% amine oxide, 10.0% nonionic surfactants, 0.25% NaOH, and the remainder as water. .sup.5 Formula D monoamine = 2.7% Varonic K215, 14% Versonol 120, 3.0% C.sub.12-14 oxypropylamine (Tomah PA19), 3.2% amine oxide, 10.0% nonionic surfactant, 0.25% NaOH, and the remainder as water. .sup.6 Conventional formula = 4.5% TKPP, 9.25% LAS acid, 2.24% AOS, 8% Dowanol glycols, 1.13% NaOH, and the remainder as fragrance/water. .sup.7 The water actually began to dry before dewatering so the time indicated is for 50% removal by either route. 
    
     EXAMPLE 3 
     Mechanical Vehicle Wash Test 
     Mechanical-brush vehicle washes were made with and without a fatty ether amine to test for enhanced gloss, water removal, and spotting. Table 3 illustrates the improved effects when using the fatty ether amine. The vehicle surfaces were evaluated with a gloss meter for gloss, and visually for dewatering and spotting. A dewatering improvement of the amine formulas vs. the conventional formulas was determined using the gravimetrically determined water weight remaining on the vehicle side surface after a 30 second drain time. Then 100%×(1 - wt on amine treated surface )=dewatering wt on conventional surface improvement. 
     
                                           TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________Mechanical Brush Formula Tests.sup.1__________________________________________________________________________                                Residual Water                                Removal Amine               Vehicle Surface  vs.               Gloss Increase   Conventional (%Run                 (vs. soiled                       50% Dewatering                                dewatering                                         Water Spot#  Test Vehicle     Detergent Formula               state).sup.2                       Rate.sup.3 (minisec)                                improvement)                                         Rating.sup.4__________________________________________________________________________1  Truck 1     alkyl-ether-               57%     0:04     83%      1.5     diamine formula 1.sup.52  Truck 1     Conventional 1               49%     1:58     --       3     (amine free).sup.6__________________________________________________________________________                                Residual Water                                Removal Amine               Vehicle Surface  vs.               Gloss Increase   Conventional (%Run                 (vs. soiled                       50% Dewatering                                dewatering                                         Water Spot#  Test Vehicle     Detergent Formula               state).sup.12                       Rate.sup.13 (minisec)                                improvement)                                         Rating.sup.14__________________________________________________________________________3  Truck 2     alkyl-ether-               31%     0:08     87%      2     diamine formula 1.sup.54  Truck 2     Conventional 1               18%     3:17     --       4     (amine free).sup.65  Truck 3     alkyl-ether-               33%     0:04     86%      1.5     diamine formula 1.sup.56  Truck 3     Conventional 1               28%     2:05     --       4     (amine free).sup.67  car 1  alkyl-ether-               125%    0:06     75%      ND     diamine formula 2.sup.78  car 1  Conventional 2               101%    3:00     --       ND     (amine free).sup.8__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.1 Two wash formulas were tested on: 1) industrial linen distribution vehicles (10&#39; high, 20&#39; long, 8&#39; width), or ii) a 1989 blue Ford Taurus wagon, using mechanical scrub brushes. Mechanical brush washings were mad using 1.3 vol % dilutions of the concentrated formulas, with and without amine additives, and the surfaces tested for enhanced gloss, water removal, and visual spotting. .sup.2 Gloss increase measured with a handheld gloss meter; measuring the surface gloss before and after cleaning in 4 quarters of the truck side surfaces (avg. of 3 measurements per area). Gloss % increase = gloss (before # - after #)/before #) × 100%. .sup.3 Dewatering rate = visual evaluation time for 50% of the water to drain from the surface. .sup.4 1 = no too few water spots, small diameter, easily removed by wiping. 2 = a few water spots, medium in size, easily removed by wiping. 3 = a few too many water spots, large in size, difficult to remove by wiping. 4 = many water spots, large insize, difficult to remove, dirty looking. ND = no data .sup.5 Amine formula 1 = 2% Varonic K215, 7% EDTA, 3% Tomah DA1618, 3.2% amine oxide, 10% nonionic surfactants, 10% Dowanol glycols, 0.25% NaOH, and the remainder as water. .sup.6 Conventional formula 2 = 4.5% TKPP, 9.25% LAS acid, 2.24% AOS, 8% Dowanol glycols, 1.13% NaOH, and the remainder as fragrance/water. .sup.12 Gloss increase measured with a handheld gloss meter; measuring th surface gloss before and after cleaning in 4 quarters of the truck side surfaces (avg. of 3 measurements per area). Gloss % increase = gloss ((before # - after #)/before #) × 100%. .sup.13 Dewatering rate = Visual evaluation time for 50% of the water to drain from the surface. .sup.14 1 = no too few water spots, small diameter, easily removed by wiping. 2 = a few water spots, medium in size, easily removed by wiping. 3 = a few too many water spots, large in size, difficult to remove by wiping. 4 = many water spots, large insize, difficult to remove, dirty looking. ND -- no data .sup.7 Amine formula 2 = 2% Tomah DA19, 14.0% Versene 100, 2.4% amine oxide, 10% ethoxylated nonionic surfactants, 10% Dowanol DPNP/DPM, and th remainder as water. .sup.8 Conventional formula 2 = 14.0% Versene 100, 2.4% amine oxide, 10% ethoxylated nonionic surfactants, 10% Dowanol DPN:/DPM, and the remainder as water. 
    
     EXAMPLE 4 
     Glass Dewatering Using Fatty Ether Amines 
     To determine the water repellency of the fatty ether amine materials on tile-glass surfaces, aqueous 0.03 wt %-active solutions were made (at various pH&#39;s), the solutions applied over the tile-glass surface, and rinsed with city water till the water quickly ran off (˜5 seconds rinse). The tile was then dried overnight and was re-rinsed with 100 mls of soft water and, after 10 seconds of drain time, the residual surface water was determined gravimetrically. The data of Table 4 shows the dewatering effect of the various amines. Water removal of &gt;90% for all the amine containing test formulas (runs 1-11) was observed relative to the non-amine test controls (runs 1-2). Also, the current invention examples show substantial improvement of the prior art commercial formulas (runs 12-20). 
     
                       TABLE 4______________________________________Water Repellency.sup.1                                 Water                          Residual                                 Removal                 Test So- Water  (% vs.Run # Amine Compound  lution pH.sup.2                          (grams)                                 control).sup.3______________________________________1     control (no amine).sup.4                 2.8      4.03   --2     control (no amine).sup.4                 10.8     5.62   --Composition of the Invention3     C.sub.12-15 linear ether diamine.sup.5                 2.6      0.12   97%4     C.sub.12-15 linear ether diamine.sup.5                 10.6     0.23   96%5     C.sub.12-15 linear ether                 2.3      0.08   98% monoamine.sup.66     C.sub.12-15 linear ether                 10.7     0.16   97% monoamine.sup.67     car wash I.sup.7 + PA-19                 11.3     0.18   97%8     car wash II + PA-19.sup.6                 11.3     0.15   97%9     car wash II.sup.8 + DA-19.sup.5                 11.2     0.21   96%10    car wash II.sup.8 + DA-1618.sup.9                 11.1     0.26   95%11    acid cleaner I.sup.10 + DA-19.sup.5                 2.7      0.06   99%Prior Art12    BELIEVE.sup.11  10.4     4.92   12%13    ZIP WAX CAR WASH -                 8.7      5.03   10% SHINE.sup.1214    SUDDEN SHINE CLEAN                 7.0      5.61   &lt;1% &amp; SHINE.sup.1315    ethoxylated alkyl amine I.sup.14                 3.0      3.98    1%16    ethoxylated alkyl amine II.sup.15                 10.0     5.87    0%17    alkyl dimethyl benzyl                 2.7      3.69    8% quat.sup.1618    alkyl dimethyl benzyl                 9.2      5.43    3% quat.sup.1619    alkyl amine acetate.sup.17                 4.7      0.55   87%20    alkyl amine/diamine                 9.8      0.38   78% mixture.sup.18______________________________________ .sup.1 The test amines or ammonium formulas were made up as 3 wt % amine in the test solutions. The commercial products (lines 17, 18, 19) were no prediluted. Each formula was tested using 12&#34; × 12&#34; glass squares which were treated with 1.5 vol % aqueous dilutions of the aforementioned solutions, at various pH&#39;s, then rinsed under well water for 5 seconds, and finally drained for 5 seconds. The residual surface water was determined gravimetrically. .sup.2 The pH was adjusted with glycolic or acetic acids. .sup.3 Water removal was calculated using 100 × (1 - residual water test sample/residual water control); where the residual water control use was control sample line1 for test solutions at pH&#39;s &lt;7.0 and control sample line2 for pH&#39;s &gt;7.0. .sup.4 Well water neutralized with glycolic acid or NaOH; i.e., no amines or ammonium compounds present. .sup.5 Tomah DA19. .sup.6 Tomah PA19. .sup.7 Car wash I = 3% ethoxylated amine, 7% EDTA, 3% Tomah PA19, 3% amin oxide, 10% nonionic surfactant, 2% silicate, 1% NaOH, and the remainder a fragrance/water. .sup.8 Car wash II = 6% monoethanol amine MEA, 5% EDTA, 8% betaine surfactant, 20% glycol solvents, 6% LAS, 3% amines, remainder as fragrance/water. .sup.9 Tomah DA1618. .sup.10 Acid cleaner I = 7% sulfamic acid, 7.5% citric acid, 12% amine oxide, 9% glycol solvents, 10% phosphoric acid, remainder as fragrance/dye/water. .sup.11 BELIEVE is an industrial car wash detergent for high pressure washing, from S. C. Johnson Co., Rascine, WI. .sup.12 ZIP WAX is a commercial car wash detergent, from Turtle Wax, Inc. Chicago, IL. .sup.13 SUDDEN SHINE is a consumer car shine and windshield dewatering aid, from Plastone Co., Bedford Park, IL. .sup.14 Prior art using ethoxylated alkylamines; JP 63048398, Ger. Offen DE 4,412,380, GB 2036783 using Exxon ET5. .sup.15 Prior art as in ref. 14, but using Varonic K215. .sup.16 Prior art using quats like WO 9222632, US 4,284,435, JP 58076477 using 0372 from Ecolab. .sup.17 Prior art like WO 9222632, US 3440063 using Armene OL. .sup.18 Prior art like US 3440063 using an amine mixture = 2:1:0.5 of Duomene OL:Duomene CD:Armene OL. 
    
     EXAMPLE 5 
     Measurement of Car Wash Brush Lubricating Action 
     The dewatering fatty alkyl ether amines of the invention can also impart a lubricious component to the polymeric brush heads used in mechanical transportation washers. This friction reduction is deemed important for minimizing scratching and wear in mechanical car wash systems employing polymeric bristle brushes to enhance auto soil removal. Recognizing a near logarithmic scale for the relative coefficient of friction (COF), the results show the remarkable improvement in lubricity of this patent (lines 1-5) vs. the prior art (lines 6-7). The COF&#39;s below 1.00 are indicative of minimal drag, while those of the prior art above 1.00 impart considerable wear to hard surfaces, and those above ˜1.3 COF indicate extreme wear. 
     
                       TABLE 5______________________________________Lubricity of Polymeric Washing Brush Surfaces.sup.1                           Relative    Friction Wash          Coefficient ofTest #   Formula      Test Amine                           Friction.sup.2______________________________________1        car wash     DA-1618   0.90    formula 1.sup.32        car wash     DA-1618   0.99    formula 2.sup.43        car wash     DA-1618   0.97    formula 3.sup.54        car wash     DA-18     0.95    formula 4.sup.66        BELIEVE CAR  benzyl quat                           1.33    WASH.sup.87        ZIP WAX CAR  none      1.22    WASH.sup.9______________________________________ .sup.1 Samples for lubricity measure were diluted to 0.1% (unless otherwise stated) with distilled water containing 200 ppm NaHCO.sub.3, an streamed along the perimeter of a polished stainless steel plate measurin 20.5 cm in diameter. The plate was connected to an electric motor, and rotated at an even rate when switched on. A polyester disk weighing 238 g was attached to a load cell and placed on the plate in the area wetted by the lubricant solution. When the electric motor was switched on, the disk glided freely on the plate. The drag between the polyester surface and th stainless steel plate was detected by the load cell, and transferred to a chart recorder. To assure consistency of the test method, the drag from a standard reference anionic wash detergent solution was measured before an after each trial run, and the value obtained therefrom arbitrarily assigned a coefficient of friction of 1.00. Each trial run was referenced to the fatty acid lubricant trials, thus the results are reported as a relative coefficient of friction vs. this standard. .sup.2 Control car wash concentrate for lubricity COF reference: 2.0% hydrotrope, 4.0% SXS, 10.0% EDTA, 8.0% nonionic surfactant, 13.5% TEA, 10.0% anionic surfactants, and the remainder soft water. .sup.3 7.0% glycols, 9.0% amine, 4.0% neutralizing acid, 2% linear nonionic surfactant, and the remainder as soft water. .sup.4 7.0% glycols, 9.0% amine, 4.0% neutralizing acid, 2% secondary nonionic surfactant, and the remainder as soft water. .sup.5 7.0% glycols, 9.0% amine, 4.0% neutralizing acid, 1% secondary nonionic surfactant, and the remainder as soft water. .sup.6 7.0% glycols, 6.0% amine, 4.0% neutralizing acid, 10% secondary nonionic surfactant, and the remainder as soft water. .sup.8 BELIEVE is an industrial car wash detergent for high pressure washing, from S. C. Johnson Co., Rascine, WI. .sup.9 ZIP WAX is a commercial car wash detergent, from Turth Wax, Inc., Chicago, IL. 
    
     EXAMPLE 6 
     Measurement of Car Wash Spotting by Hard Waters 
     A test was performed to determine the ability of coatings of the fatty amines of the invention to repel or minimize ever present, and unsightly, water spots in detergent products (like windshield dewatering aids). Because this soil, on a windshield, is one of the more visual for a consumer, any control would be quite beneficial. Tables 6 and 7 list evaluations for various amines, 2 control samples, and 4 examples of competitive art for hard water scale formation. The test was conducted by applying the amine coating to a glassy-ceramic titled surface, except for the control samples, then followed by 15 well water rinses, with 30-minute drying between rinses. The tiles were visually evaluated at the end of the 15 cycles on a scale of 1-4 (see reference #2 in Table 6). 
     The current results show that the longer chain (&gt;C12) alkyl-ether amines function extremely well as hard-surface water spot inhibitors while the prior art is less effective, and sometimes comparable to no treatment at all. 
     
                       TABLE 6______________________________________Anti-Scaling Properties of Amine CoatingsUsing Well Water                           Final Well    Amine Anti-  Test Solution                           Water SpotRun #    Sealant      pH.sup.1  Rating.sup.2______________________________________Compositions of the Invention1        C.sub.12-15 linear                 2.6       1    ether diamine.sup.32        C.sub.12-15 linear                 6.0       1    ether diamine.sup.33        C.sub.12-15 linear                 10.5      1    ether diamine.sup.34        C.sub.12-14 linear                 2.2       1    ether diamine.sup.45        C.sub.12-14 linear                 8.8       1    ether diamine.sup.46        branched     3.0       2    isotridecyl    ether diamine.sup.57        branched     8.0       2    isotridecyl    ether diamine.sup.58        C.sub.8-10 linear                 8.4       3    ether monoamine.sup.69        C.sub.8-10 linear                 3.2       4    ether monoamine.sup.6Prior Art10       prior art.sup.7 ;                 8.0       2    ethoxylated    alkyl amine.sup.811       prior art.sup.9 ;                 2.7       4    benzyl quat.sup.1012       prior art.sup.9 ;                 7.4       4    benzyl quat.sup.1013       none (control                 3.1       4    A).sup.1114       none (control                 8.6       4    B).sup.11______________________________________ .sup.1 pH adjusted with glycolic acid. .sup.2 1 = no to few water spots, small diameter, easily removed by wiping. 2 = a few water spots, medium in size, easily removed by wiping. 3 = a few to many water spots, large in size, difficult to remove by wiping. 4 = many water spots, large in size, difficult to remove, dirty looking. .sup.3 Tomah DA19. .sup.4 Tomah DA1618. .sup.5 Tomah DA17. .sup.6 Tomah PA1214. .sup.9 current art using quats; JP 58076477. .sup.10 Ecolab Q372 quat. .sup.11 Control = a tile cleaned with Chlorox cleanser, rinsed five times and dried. 
    
     EXAMPLE 7 
     Water Spot Reduction in Detergent Cleaners 
     Example 6 was repeated but now using formulated detergent cleaners instead of dewatering aids. Similar control of water spotting can be achieved. 
     
                       TABLE 7______________________________________Anti-Spotting Properties of Amine Coatings inFormulated Cleaners                           Final Well WaterRun #  Cleaning Product               Test Solution pH                           Spot Rating.sup.1______________________________________1      acid cleaner.sup.2               2.6         4  (no amine)2      acid cleaner.sup.2               3.0         1  (with ether  amine).sup.33      neutral cleaner.sup.4               7.1         4  (no amine)4      neutral cleaner.sup.4               6.7         1  (with ether  amine).sup.35      alkaline     10.3        4  cleaner.sup.5 (no  amine)6      alkaline     10.3        2  cleaner.sup.5 (with  ether amine).sup.3______________________________________ .sup.1 Concentrated cleaners used at recommended 2oz/gal. dilution. .sup.2 Acid Cleaner = 7% sulfamic acid, 7.5% citric acid, 12% amine oxide 9% glycol solvents, 10% phosphoric acid, remainder as fragrance/dye/water .sup.3 Amine = Tomah DA19. .sup.4 neutral cleaner: 6.8% acetic acid, 9.6% KOH, 10.0% linear alcohol ethoxylate, 10.0% hexylene glycol, remainder water. Additional KOH used for neutralization when no amine present. .sup.5 Alkaline Cleaner = 6% MEA, 5% EDTA, 8% betaine surfactant, 20% glycol solvents, 6% LAS, remainder as fragrance/water. 
    
     EXAMPLE 8 
     Testing Procedure for Concentrate Stability 
     Detergent samples were prepared fatty alkyl ether amines of the invention, and the prior art as taught by Chestochowski 2  and Fasterding 2 , with alcohol or glycol-type solvents added at various levels to fulfill the prior art&#39;s requirement for a stabilizing hydrotrope. Samples were warmed to 49° C. and stirred continuously for 30 minutes, after which time formula stability was assessed visually. The results, shown in Table 8, demonstrate an advantage to the incorporation of the highly soluble linear alkyl ether amines or diamines, insofar as a hydrotrope is not required for concentrate stability. This is a departure from the prior art as described by the cited references; i.e., the use of alkyl ether amines and diamines allows for minimizing or eliminating co-solvents and hydrotropes, while the formulas of the prior art require substantial hydrotrope coupling. 
     
                       TABLE 8______________________________________Concentrate Stability with Hydrotropesat Various Levels                               Concentrate   Base Formula               Hydrotrope                         %     Stability______________________________________current alkyl ether --        0.0   OKinvention.sup.1   diamineprior art.sup.2   alkyl diamine               --        0.0   undissolved                               solids.sup.3current alkyl ether propylene 2.5   OKinvention.sup.1   diamine     glycolprior art.sup.2   alkyl diamine               propylene 2.5   undissolved               glycol          solidscurrent alkyl ether propylene 5.0   OKinvention.sup.1   diamine     glycolprior art.sup.2   alkyl diamine               propylene 5.0   undissolved               glycol          solidscurrent alkyl ether hexylene  2.5   OKinvention.sup.1   diamine     glycolprior art.sup.2   alkyl diamine               hexylene  2.5   undissolved               glycol          solidscurrent alkyl ether hexylene  5.0   OKinvention.sup.1   diamine     glycolprior art.sup.2   alkyl diamine               hexylene  5.0   OK               glycolcurrent alkyl ether isopropanol                         2.5   OKinvention.sup.1   diamineprior art.sup.2   alkyl diamine               isopropanol                         2.5   undissolved                               solidscurrent alkyl ether isopropanol                         5.0   OKinvention.sup.1   diamineprior art.sup.2   alkyl diamine               isopropanol                         5.0   OK______________________________________ .sup.1 Proposed art incorporating linear alkyl ether diamines, formulated as follows: designated hydrotrope with 2.5% acetic acid, 10.0% C.sub.12-1 alkyloxypropyl1,3-diamino propane, 10.0% nonionic surfactant, and the remainder soft water. .sup.2 Prior art as per DD 91104, US 3440063, and DE 3439440 formulated with designated hydrotropes and 2.5% acetic acid, 6.6% NOleyl-1,3-diamino propane, 3.4% Ncoco-1,3-diamino propane, 10% nonionic surfactant, and the remainder soft water. .sup.3 Undissolved solids in the liquid material are not desirable, singl phase liquids are preferred. 
    
     EXAMPLE 9 
     Test Procedure for Use Solution Clarity at Various pH&#39;s 
     Samples representing the proposed invention and the prior art set forth in the footnotes of Table 9 were formulated according to the compositions in Table 9 below. One percent solutions were prepared using the challenge water diluent (below), and the solution pH adjusted to 5-10 with dilute acetic acid or KOH. Clouding behavior was determined after 15 minutes. Surprisingly, the superior solubility of the proposed arts linear alkyl ether (di)amines as evidenced by the aforementioned concentrate stability, is buttressed by a tolerance for anions which is unsurpassed by the current fatty amine technology. The alkyl ether (di)amines allow for an extended pH range for formulation, and selection of the appropriate alkyl ether amine raw material allows for a formulation pH range not available with the prior art amines. 
     Preparation of Challenge Water 
     A test of clouding behavior of detergent solutions as per Weber 6  was done. A 500 ppm Na 2  SO 4  and 500 ppm NaCl softened water preparation was made. This anion-laden water was used as the detergent diluent. 
     
                                           TABLE 9__________________________________________________________________________Solution Clarity at pH 5-10 in Anion-Laden Soft WaterCompositions           1% Solution Clarity in Challenge.sup.1 Water                  pH.sup.2Test   Formula     Amine Type % 5   6   7   8   10  11__________________________________________________________________________Proposed Art1  detergent I.sup.3     tetradecyloxypropyl-                8 clear                      clear                          clear                              clear                                  cloudy                                      --     1,3-diamino propane2  detergent     C.sub.12-14 alkyloxypropyl-                8 clear                      clear                          clear                              clear                                  cloudy                                      --   II.sup.3     1,3 diamino propane3  detergent     C.sub.12-14 alkyloxypropane                6 clear                      clear                          clear                              clear                                  cloudy                                      --   III.sup.3     1,3 diamino propane4  detergent     C.sub.12-15 alkyl-                3 --  --  --  --  --  clear   IV.sup.4     oxypropylamine5  detergent     C.sub.12-14 alkyloxypropyl-                3 --  --  --  --  --  clear   IV.sup.4     1,3 diamino propanePrior Art6  prior art     cocoamine  3 --  --  --  --  --  cloudy   I.sup.4,5,67  prior art     oleylamine 3 --  --  --  --  --  cloudy   I.sup.4,5,69  prior art     N-oleyl-1,3-diamino                8 hazy/                      hazy/                          cloudy                              cloudy                                  cloudy                                      --   III.sup.3,5,6     propane      opaque                      opaque10 prior II.sup.3,5,6     N-oleyl/cocoa-1,3-                4/4                  clear                      clear                          clear                              cloudy                                  cloudy                                      --     diamino propane11 prior art     N-oleyl/cocoa-1,3-                4/4                  clear                      clear                          clear                              cloudy                                  cloudy                                      --   III.sup.3,5,6     diamino propane12 prior art     N-oleyl/coco-1,3-                4/2                  cloudy                      clear                          clear                              cloudy                                  cloudy                                      --   III.sup.3,5,6     diamino propane__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.1 Challenge water prepared by adding 500 ppm Na.sub.2 SO.sub.4 and 500 ppm NaCl to softened water. .sup.2 1% detergent solutions adjusted to pH 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 with dilute acetic acid or dilute KOH. .sup.3 Composition of formulas: 8.0% total amines, 10.0% hydrotrope, 1.8% acetic acid, 10.0% nonionic surfactant, and 70.2% water. .sup.4 Composition of formula: 3.0% amine, 7.0% EDTA, 12.7% alcohol and alkylamine nonionic surfactants, 2.5% builder, 3.2% amine oxide. .sup.5 Prior art as taught by DD 91104, US 3440063, and DE 3439440. .sup.6 Prior art examples presented in US 5441654, and US 5062978. 
    
     EXAMPLE 10 
     Test Procedure for Concentrate Flammability 
     Windshield dewatering samples representing the proposed invention and the prior art were tested for consumer safety by pouring 1 gram of the formula concentrate on a watch glass slide and heating with a propane flame. The results of Table 10 show a subjective rating of the products, and demonstrate the aqueous fatty alkyl ether amines to be much safer for general use over the prior art. The current invention samples (test 1-3) went to dryness, while all the prior art examples (4-7) supported rapid to instantaneous combustion. 
     
                       TABLE 10______________________________________Flammability of Window Dewatering Aids.sup.1Test #    Wash Formula   Flammability______________________________________Current Art1         car dewatering flash point &gt;180° F.     formula 3.sup.22         car dewatering flash point &gt;180° F.     formula 4.sup.23         car dewatering flash point &gt;180° F.     formula 5.sup.2Prior Art4         SUDDEN SHINE.sup.3                    flammable5         RAIN-X.sup.4   very flammable6         prior art I.sup.5                    very flammable7         prior art II.sup.6                    flammable______________________________________ .sup.1 Samples representing the proposed invention and the prior art were tested for consumer safety by pouring 1 gram of the formula concentrate o a watch glass slide and heating with a propane flame. The results show a subjective rating of the products. .sup.2 Same test samples as noted in Table 5. .sup.3 SUDDEN SHINE is a commercial auto dewatering aid from Plastone Co. Chicago, IL. .sup.4 RAINX is a commercial auto windshield dewatering aid, from .sub.----, Phoenix, AZ. .sup.5 prior art as taught in DD 91104. .sup.6 prior art as taught in DE 3439440. 
    
     
                       TABLE 11______________________________________Vendor Trade Name  Chemical Name R group______________________________________Commercially Available Diamines and Ether DiaminesCited in the ExamplesTomah  DA-19       C.sub.12-15   linear,              alkyloxypropyl-                            C.sub.12 H.sub.25 /C.sub.15 H.sub.31              1,3-diamino              propaneTomah  DA-18       tetradecyloxy-                            linear,              propyl-1,3 diamino                            C.sub.14 H.sub.29              propaneTomah  DA-17       isotridecyloxyprop                            branched,              yl-1,3 diamino                            C.sub.12 H.sub.25              propaneTomah  DA-1618     C.sub.12-14   linear,              alkyloxypropyl-1,3                            C.sub.12 H.sub.25 /C.sub.14 H.sub.27              diamino propaneTomah  DA-14       isodecyloxypropyl-                            branched,              1,3 diamino   C.sub.10 H.sub.21              propaneAkzo   Duomeen OL  N-oleyl-1,3   linear,              diamino propane                            C.sub.18:1 H.sub.35Akzo   Duomeen CD  N-coco-1,3 diamino                            linear              propane       C.sub.12-14 H.sub.25-29Commercially Available Amines andEther Amines Cited in the ExamplesTomah  PA-19       C.sub.12-15 alkyloxypropyl                            linear,              amine         C.sub.12 H.sub.25 /C.sub.15 H.sub.31Tomah  PA-17       isotridecyloxypropyl                            branched,              amine         C.sub.13 H.sub.27Tomah  PA-16       isododecyloxypropyl                            branched,              amine         C.sub.12 H.sub.25Tomah  PA-14       isodecyloxypropyl                            branched,              amine         C.sub.10 H.sub.21Tomah  PA-1214     octyl/decyloxypropyl                            branched,              amine         C.sub.8 H.sub.17 /C.sub.10 H.sub.21Akzo   Armeen OL   oleylamine    linear,                            C.sub.18:1 H.sub.35______________________________________ 
    
     Solid Wash and Dry Car Wash Formula 
     The following formulation was manufactured into a solid block car wash formulation that could be dispensed by spraying the solid composition with water in a dispenser creating a concentrate solution that can be then conveyed to a use locus in a vehicle cleaning station. The formulation is made by introducing ingredients 1 through 4 in a heated stirred tank of appropriate size. After the material is heated and mixed to a temperature of about 75° C., ingredients 5 and 6 are added and mixed until uniform. In the uniform mixture, item 7 is added and mixed until uniform. After equilibration is achieved, powdered ingredients 8 and 9 are slowly added to avoid caking or lumping. The composition is stirred until uniform and charged in 8 pound portions to polyethylene bottles which can then be cooled and solidified. The bottles are ideal for capping, distribution and use at a vehicle cleaning station. The solid formulation achieves results similar to the liquid formulation set forth above. 
     
         ______________________________________Formula              %______________________________________1       Nonionic PEG ether of a                    12.0   C.sub.12-15 alcohol Neodol 25-72       Nonionic PEG ether of a                    17.0   C.sub.6-11 alcohol Neodol 91-63       EDTA (Liq 40%)   12.04       Urea             22.05       Ether amine Tomah DA-1618                    6.06       Varonic K-215    9.07       Admox 14815      8.08       EDTA (Pwd)       11.09       G.D. Silicate    3.0______________________________________ 
    
     The above specification, examples and data provide a complete description of the manufacture and use of the composition of the invention. Since many embodiments of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides in the claims hereinafter appended.