Abstract:
A process for destruction of hazardous materials in a medium of supercritical water without the addition of an oxidant material. The harzardous material is converted to simple compounds which are relatively benign or easily treatable to yield materials which can be discharged into the environment. Treatment agents may be added to the reactants in order to bind certain materials, such as chlorine, in the form of salts or to otherwise facilitate the destruction reactions.

Description:
This invention is the result of a contract with the Department of Energy (Contract No. W-7405-ENG-36) and a contract with the U.S. Air Force. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     This invention relates to the fields of chemistry and reaction kinetics. 
     This invention was born of a need for a process to destroy explosives and gun propellants which does not pollute the atmosphere, such as do open burning and open detonation, and which does not simply transform the materials into other compounds whose safe disposal is difficult. The invention is also applicable to other types of hazardous materials. 
     Oxidation of waste materials with added oxygen in water which is at a temperature and pressure above its critical point (supercritical water oxidation) is known. The oxygen for the reaction is supplied in gaseous form or as a cryogenic liquid or as part of an oxygen-rich liquid such as hydrogen peroxide. The use of water above its critical point (374° C. and 3209 psia) as the medium provides a number of advantages. The solvent properties of supercritical water are different from those of liquid water in that non-polar lipophilic compounds are soluble and salts are less soluble. The majority of hazardous wastes which it is desired to destroy will be soluble in supercritical water. Because complete mixing is possible in the single-phase supercritical region, reaction kinetics are not diffusion limited. In contrast, in two-phase systems, concentration gradients across phase boundaries limit the extent to which compounds can be destroyed. 
     It is expected that the supercritical oxidation of the present invention will result in conversion of hazardous materials to relatively benign substances and/or to substances which are easily treatable such that they are rendered fit for ultimate disposal into the environment. The products of the inventive process are expected to be primarily CO, CO 2 , H 2  O, N 2 , N 2  O, H 2 , and certain salts. Though oxidation in the medium of supercritical water is similar to combustion, it takes place at lower temperatures than incineration and thus is expected to produce only trace amounts of NO x , thus solving the significant air pollution problem of NO x  emission. Though the process will produce N 2  O, which is a &#34;greenhouse effect&#34; gas, N 2  O is considered to be a much less serious problem than NO x . In addition, N 2  O in the atmosphere will not tend to form NO x  but will tend to break down into N 2  and O 2 . 
     The inventive process is contained and thus its effluents can be completely controlled, in contrast to open burning. Because water is the reaction medium, the process can be used for a variety of wastes containing water or for contaminated water. There appear to be no technological upper or lower limit to the concentrations of waste material which can be destroyed. The process can be applied to difficult problems such as cleaning contaminated soil from a polluted site, destruction of armaments, such as solid fuel in a missile, and various types of radioactive waste. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     This invention is a process for destruction of hazardous materials in a medium of supercritical water without the addition of an oxidant material. The hazardous material is converted to simple compounds which are relatively benign or easily treatable to yield materials which can be discharged into the environment. Treatment agents may be added to the reactants in order to bind certain materials, such as chlorine, in the form of salts or to otherwise facilitate the destruction reactions. 
    
    
     BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE DRAWING 
     The Drawing is a schematic representation of a system for destruction of hazardous waste using supercritical water oxidation. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     The Drawing depicts a system which may be used for supercritical waste oxidation. Only basic equipment is shown; those skilled in the art of process system design are capable of providing a system having all necessary components for efficient operation. Referring to the Drawing, waste is mixed with water in tank 1 by agitator 2. The mixture may be a slurry if the waste is not soluble in low temperature water. The mixture flows from tank 1 via conduit 3 to pump 4, where the pressure is increased to a value above the critical pressure of water. The mixture is conveyed by conduit 5 to reactor 9, which is tubing arranged in a coil. A portion of the reactor is wrapped with electrical resistance heating tape, which is used to heat the mixture in the coil to a temperature greater than the critical temperature of water. Electrical power is supplied to the heating tape by means of power supply 6 and leads 7 and 8. The mixture exits the reactor and flows via conduit 10 to heat exchanger 11 where it is cooled by water supplied to the heat exchanger by conduit 14 and removed from the heat exchanger by conduit 15. Cooled effluent from the heat exchanger flows through conduit 12 and pressure control valve 13, which maintains backpressure in the upstream components at a value above the critical pressure of water. Before being routed to final disposal means by conduit 17, the effluent is subjected to various types of analysis by equipment represented by reference number 16. Pressure sensor 19 and temperature sensor 20 are provided to monitor reaction conditions. 
     Experimentation was accomplished using a system similar to that of the Drawing with several different materials. A 0.1M ammonium perchlorate (NH 4  C1O 4 ) solution (12 g/1) was prepared using a 0.1M NaOH solution. This mixture was raised to a pressure of 5500 psig and to several temperatures both below and above the critical temperature of water to determine at which temperatures destruction reactions would take place. Runs were made at different residence times, that is, the time intervals for which the mixture was held at the high pressure and temperatures. The results are shown in Table I. At 200° and 300° C., which are below the critical temperature, none of the C1O 4  was destroyed, as determined by analysis of the effluent liquid, which showed that 100% of the C1O 4  was present. At 400° C., slightly above the critical temperature, still none of the C1O 4  was destroyed. This was the case for residence times up to 330 seconds at the temperatures of 200°, 300°, and 400°  C. As might be expected, a portion of the NH 4  was not found in the liquid effluent and, most likely, was in the gaseous portion of the effluent as NH 3 . 
     At 500° C. and the relatively short residence times of 15, 30, and 60 seconds, virtually all of the NH 4  and C1O 4  were destroyed; amounts in the liquid effluent were below the levels of detection of which the analysis instruments were capable. Very little NO 2  - and NO 3  - was found in the liquid effluent. The amount of C1 which was found in the liquid as NaC1 was 87% of the starting amount. The gaseous portion of the effluent was monitored for C1 2  and H 2  and none was found. What happened to the remaining C1 is unknown. Based on known reaction kinetics of NH 4  C1O 4  it is believed that no NOC1 was formed. Though the effluent gas was not analyzed, it is believed that it was N 2  O or N 2 . 
     
                       TABLE I______________________________________Temperature: 200° C.Residence Time, seconds            83        165     330% NH.sub.4 Recovered            78        75       80% ClO.sub.4      100       100     100Temperature: 300° C.Residence Time, seconds            70        280% NH.sub.4 Recovered            90        77% ClO.sub.4 Recovered            100       100Temperature: 400° C.Residence Time, seconds            45        90      180% NH.sub.4 Recovered            93        80       70% ClO.sub.4 Recovered            100       100     100Temperature: 500° C.Residence Time, seconds            15        30       60% NH.sub.4 Recovered             &lt;0.1      &lt;0.1     &lt;0.1% ClO.sub.4 Recovered             &lt;0.2      &lt;0.2     &lt;0.1% Cl Recovered as Cl.sup.-            87        87      --% N Recovered as NO.sub.2 .sup.-             &lt;0.2      &lt;0.2   --% N Recovered as NO.sub.3 .sup.-              1.9       1.9   --______________________________________ 
    
     In summary, it is believed that the ammonium perchlorate was destroyed without producing hazardous and undesirable substances (C1 2 , NOC1, NO x , nitrates, nitrites) and producing gaseous and liquid effluents which need none or little additional treatment. NaOH added to the reactants was a treatment agent whose purpose was to combine with the C1 to produce NaC1. 
     Nitromethane (CH 3  NO 2 ) was subjected to supercritical oxidation at 5500 psig; the results are shown in Table II. The concentration of CH 3  NO 2 , which is slightly soluble in water, in the mixture which was raised to a pressure and temperature above the critical conditions for water, was 0.16M (10 g/1). At 400° C., 84% of the CH 3  NO 2  was destroyed in 3 minutes. At 500° C. and 15 seconds residence time, 8% of the nitromethane is unreacted and present in the liquid effluent, but at the same temperature and longer residence times, the unreacted amount is below the limit of detection of the analysis equipment which was used. Increasing the water and nitromethane temperature to 580° C. resulted in very rapid destruction. Very little or no nitrate or nitrite was found in the liquid effluent; the concentrations were not detectable with the equipment used for analysis. Though the gaseous effluent was not analyzed in the experiments run to date, it is expected that it consisted of one or more gases from a group consisting of N 2 , CO, CO 2 , N 2  O, and H 2 . If it is desirable to dissolve the nitromethane, which is a liquid at some temperatures, or to disperse it in the water, a treatment agent of liquid CO 2  might be added to the reaction mixture. 
     
                       TABLE II______________________________________Temperature: 400° C.Residence Time seconds           45         90     180% CH.sub.3 NO.sub.2 Recovered           57         43     16Temperature: 500° C.Residence Time seconds           15         30     60% CH.sub.3 NO.sub.2 Recovered            8         &lt;1     &lt;1% N as NO.sub.2 .sup.-           --         --      &lt;0.2% N as NO.sub.3 .sup.-           --         --      &lt;0.2Temperature: 580° C.Residence Time seconds           9.4        19     38% CH.sub.3 NO.sub.2 Recovered           &lt;1         &lt;1     &lt;1% N as NO.sub.2 .sup.-            &lt;0.2      --     --% N as NO.sub.3 .sup.-            &lt;0.2      --     --______________________________________ 
    
     A solution of the explosive HMX (1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetraazacyclooctane) dissolved in methylethylketone was mixed with the water in ppm amounts and the mixture (HMX is relatively insoluble) was raised to supercritical conditions of above 500° C. and above 4500 psia. The chemical formula of HMX is C 4  N 8  O 8  H 8 . Only very small amounts of NO 2  - and NO 3  - were found in the liquid effluent from the reactor. It is believed that the products of the reactions which took place were one or more of the compounds in a group consisting of CO, CO 2 , H 2  O, N 2 , and N 2  O. 
     Pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) in water was subjected to supercritical conditions with the same results as with HMX. The chemical formula of PETN is C(CH 2  ONO 2 ) 4 . Ferrocyanide in water was tested; no HCN was detected in the effluent gas and none of the starting compound was found in the liquid effluent. 
     We believe that it is necessary to use a temperature above about 500° C. and a pressure above about 4500 psia to destroy most substances; using supercritical water which is not above those pressures and temperatures may not be effective. Also, it may be that the water is participating in the reaction; other research has not indicated this and it has been believed that the water has been only a medium for the reactions. 
     Where a hazardous material is deficient in oxygen, that is, is a predominantly reducing material, it may be combined with a predominately oxidizing hazardous material and then the mixture can be raised to supercritical conditions for destruction. The reactions which take place in the supercritical water are primarily exothermic. Should an endothermic reaction be necessary to destroy a waste, the waste can be combined with compounds whose reactions are exothermic. 
     To destroy explosives using the invention will require testing to determine that the explosives can be safely handled in the steps prior to destruction in the reactor. 
     Hastelloy C-276 was the material of construction of the reactor and 316 stainless steel was used for other components. Effluents were checked for metals. The only potential corrosion problem which was noted was that ammonium perchlorate destruction resulted in higher values of metals in the effluent. This must be further investigated. 
     Treatment agents will be added to the reaction mixtures to interact with materials as necessary, such as NaOH to neutralize mineral acids.