Abstract:
A penetrator for a Puncture Communication Tool includes a base; a body extending from the base and terminating at a tip; and a fluid bypass disposed in the body. Communicating a hydraulic chamber.

Description:
BACKGROUND 
     In the downhole industry, control of flow is critical to a compliant operation. Many different valves and safeties have been and are employed to ensure well control. One such device is a Surface Controlled Subsurface Safety Valve (SCSSV). These are often installed during completion of the well and function to provide rapid valve closing under various preselected conditions or upon command from a command center, which may be at surface. Over time, the SCSSV may experience deterioration due to a number of factors and it may then become desirable to replace its function with a replacement valve such as a wireline insert SCSSV. In such case, the control line that had operated the original SCSSV would be accessed to provide controllable hydraulic fluid pressure to the insert SCSSV. Normally this is affected by using a puncture communication tool. It is to be understood that an SCSSV is only an example of the type of tool that might use a puncture communication tool. Any other tool where communication to a hydraulic fluid chamber is also contemplated. Such a tool is illustrated in prior art  FIGS. 1 and 2 , in a run-in and an actuated position, respectively. This device is well known to the art and commercially available from Baker Hughes Incorporated, Houston Tex. It is therefore not necessary to consider the Figures in detail but rather suffices to note that a ramp  10  is visible in both Figures but in a different position. The positional change in the ramp causes a penetrator assembly  12  to move radially thereby causing a penetrator  14  to puncture a hydraulic fluid chamber  16 . 
     While the Puncture communication tool of the prior art serves its purpose well, it requires that the penetrator  14  be retracted to ensure that the hydraulic fluid chamber has been successfully breached. This is verified by a pressure change registered remotely such as at the surface. Because the penetrator itself may effectively plug the opening the penetrator creates, there may be insufficient pressure change (drop or rise if tubing pressure is higher than hydraulic cylinder pressure at that time) to be measured at surface hence the requirement for retracting the penetrator to verify its action. In the event successful penetration was not achieved, the Puncture Communication Tool would have to be re-actuated and placement might not be exactly the same or the tool might be tripped out for redress simply to avoid damage. Moreover, it is possible that the penetrator will be broken during the retraction which will require a trip to surface to replace the penetrator at least. 
     As one of skill in the art is painfully aware, any additional actions required for any well function come at an exquisitely high price in terms of equipment to perform the action, loss of production, etc. Accordingly, the art is always receptive to improvements in processes and tools to improve efficiency 
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION 
     A penetrator for a Puncture Communication Tool includes a base; a body extending from the base and terminating at a tip; and a fluid bypass disposed in the body. 
     A method for communicating a hydraulic chamber includes urging a penetrator through a wall of a hydraulic chamber to penetrate into the hydraulic chamber; registering a pressure change in the hydraulic chamber without retracting the penetrator. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       The following descriptions should not be considered limiting in any way. With reference to the accompanying drawings, like elements are numbered alike: 
         FIG. 1  is a cross sectional view of a portion of a prior art Puncture Communication Tool in a run in position; 
         FIG. 2  is a cross sectional view of the portion of a prior art Puncture Communication Tool of  FIG. 1  in an actuated position; 
         FIG. 3  is a perspective view of a penetrator as described herein; 
         FIG. 4  is a perspective view of a penetrator as described herein; 
         FIG. 5  is a perspective view of a penetrator as described herein; 
         FIG. 6  is a perspective view of a penetrator as described herein; and 
         FIG. 7  is a perspective view of a penetrator as described herein. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     Referring to  FIGS. 3-7  simultaneously, one of skill in the art will understand the overarching functional requirement of facilitating immediate fluid communication through the various penetrator  14  configurations upon breach of the hydraulic chamber  16 . In each case, a fluid bypass is created even if the penetrator  14  itself remains in the breach that it created in the hydraulic chamber  16 . 
     Referring to  FIG. 3 , a first embodiment of the penetrator  14  is illustrated in a perspective view. The Penetrator  14  includes a base  20  and a tip  22 . The base  20  is of a greater area than the tip  22  more for convenience than for function as the base will interact with the prior art Puncture Communication Tool in the same way that the prior art penetrator did. The tip  22  is configured (shaped and dimensioned) to create the hole into the hydraulic chamber. 
     Importantly to the embodiment is the configuration of the section between the base and the tip, given the moniker herein of “body”  24 . The body  24  is roughly hourglass shaped, with the thinnest portion denoted neck  26 . Precisely how radically the hourglass shape is shaped relates to both fluid passage desired and strength of the penetrator  14 . The two considerations are juxtaposed to one another. More particularly, the more extreme the hourglass shape (narrower the neck), the more fluid flow is achievable but the weaker the penetrator simply because the amount of material that makes up the smallest diameter along the hourglass shape will be the weak link. Fluid flow will be greater because an annulus formed between the puncture size in the hydraulic chamber (dictated by the tip dimensions) and the neck  26  of the hourglass will have a larger annular dimension as the neck diameter decreases. 
     In two other illustrated embodiments, referring to  FIGS. 4 and 5 , the penetrator  14  comprises base  20  and tip  22  as in  FIG. 3  but body  24  is distinct. Body  24  comprises a flared frustoconical structure beginning at the base  20  and ending at the tip  22 . This shape is very similar to the prior art penetrator but in the invention, the body  24  is also provided with one or more recesses  30  therein (one illustrated) positioned through a side of the body  24 . Such a recess is producible by any number of machining tools that are known to the art. Referring to  FIG. 5 , it will be appreciated that the recess  30  extends into the surface of tip  22  while that of  FIG. 4  does not extend to the surface of tip  22 . In either case, the recess  30  provides a fluid pathway through which fluid in the hydraulic chamber  16  may escape thereby facilitating a pressure change thereby confirming penetration of the penetrator in to the hydraulic chamber  16 . Communication with the control line is hence assured. 
     In another embodiment hereof, referring to  FIG. 6 , the penetrator  14  includes one or more passageways  32  through tip  22  and into body  24 . While the one or more passageways  32  is illustrated to originate at tip  22  and extend coaxially with penetrator  14 , it need not be so positioned. The opening could be off center and the one or more passageways would be off center and parallel with the axis of penetrator  14  or could be nonparallel with the axis of penetrator  14 . The depth of the one or more passageways  32  into body  24  is variable. The one or more passageways  32  is intersected with one or more cross passageways  34  that vent the passageway  32  to a surface of body  24 . Although the cross passageways  34  in  FIG. 6  are positioned orthogonally to passageway  32 , they can be positioned at any angle that allows the fluid in passageway  32  to vent to a surface of body  24 . Also, although a single cross passageway is drilled diametrically across body  24 , it is noted that the cross passageway  34  could be radially positioned to extend from the passageway  32  to one side of the body  24  instead of both sides. There can also be more cross passageways and they may be at any angle. 
     Finally, referring to  FIG. 7 , another alternate embodiment presents one or more through bore  36  from tip  22  to base  20 . The one or more through bores may be of varied diameter and can be positioned coaxially or non-coaxially with the penetrator  14 . In the case of one or more through bores being non-coaxial, they or it may be in parallel to the axis or may be nonparallel with the axis. In each embodiment fluid will pass the penetrator upon puncturing the hydraulic chamber thereby allowing a pressure change to be perceivable remotely to confirm puncture. 
     While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment or embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the claims. Also, in the drawings and the description, there have been disclosed exemplary embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms may have been employed, they are unless otherwise stated used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention therefore not being so limited. Moreover, the use of the terms first, second, etc. do not denote any order or importance, but rather the terms first, second, etc. are used to distinguish one element from another. Furthermore, the use of the terms a, an, etc. do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced item.