Abstract:
A pneumatic radial tire for a small-size passenger car having substantially the same structure as in the conventional tire includes a pair of bead portions each with a monostrand bead core of a particular cross-sectional shape made by spiral winding of a rubberized steel wire having a particular diameter. The bead core has a particular ratio of distance between center points of adjacent steel wire windings to the diameter of the steel wire and a length overlapping a winding start point of the steel wire with a winding terminal point thereof.

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     This invention relates to a pneumatic radial tire for a small-size passenger car having improved steering stability by improving a structure of a bead portion without causing the lowering of tire breaking pressure (safety factor of tire) resulting from the bead portion and capable of reducing the cost and improving production efficiency by controlling an extra use of bead wire. 
     2. Description of the Related Art 
     In this type of the pneumatic tire, the bead core located in the bead portion acts to fix an end portion of the carcass ply comprised of fiber cords or steel wire cords wound therearound and to define a size of an inner periphery of the tire itself and ensure fitting to a wheel rim. 
     Thus, the bead core is a very important member in a pneumatic tire, so that there have been proposed various structures of the bead portion. 
     For instance, a known bead core is obtained by spirally winding a band-shaped rubber-wire composite containing plural wires arranged side by side and embedded therein several times into a given shape as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 (JP-U-61-110406) and also, a monostrand bead core for use in heavy duty pneumatic tires obtained by coating a wire with uncured rubber at a given thickness to from a bead wire and then spirally winding the bead wire in a given shape (JP-A-2-286407). 
     In the conventional pneumatic tire, however, a relation between a length overlapping a winding start portion with a winding terminal portion in the bead core and a tire breaking pressure (safety factor of tire) is not clear, so that the tire breaking pressure in the bead portion is insufficient. In particular, the stress concentration is increased in the step portion defined by the winding start portion or the winding terminal portion to bring about the lowering of the tire breaking pressure. Furthermore, the amount of bead wire used is excessive to increase the cost and degrade the production efficiency. 
     Moreover, the shape of the bead core made from the band-shaped rubber-wire composite or the monostrand bead core as mentioned above is largely obtained in tire building and vulcanization steps, so that it is difficult to hold tire uniformity in circumferential and radial directions of the tire and hence the steering stability of the resulting tire product is considerably degraded. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     It is, therefore, an object of the invention to solve the aforementioned problems of the conventional bead cores and to provide a pneumatic radial tire for a small-size passenger car capable of improving steering stability by controlling the disorder of tire uniformity in radial and circumferential directions due to the bead core without lowering of tire breaking pressure (safety factor of tire) and controlling an extra use of bead wire for the reduction of cost and the improvement of production efficiency. 
     According to the invention, there is the provision of a pneumatic radial tire for a small-size passenger car comprising a tread portion, a pair of sidewall portion extending from both side ends of the tread portion, and a pair of bead portions each including a bead core therein and extending from an inner peripheral end of the sidewall portion. The bead core is a monostrand bead core having a compact unit structure of 3 to 10 steel wire windings in cross-section and formed by spirally winding a steel wire of circular section covered with a coating rubber and binding the steel wire windings into a bundle, and the steel wire has a diameter (D) of 1.2-2.2 mm, and a ratio of distance between center points of adjacent steel wire windings in said bead core (H) to diameter (D) of the steel wire is within a range of 1.01-1.2, and a length L (mm) overlapping a winding start point of the steel wire with a winding terminal point thereof satisfies the following equation: 
     
         L≧4.0×10×πr.sup.2 ×(f/A) 
    
     wherein r is a radius (mm) of the steel wire, f is a tensile strength (kgf/mm 2 ) of the steel wire and A is a drawing force (kgf) of the steel wire from the coating rubber. 
     In preferable embodiments of the invention, the tire has a tire size of not more than 13 inches, and the diameter (D) of the steel wire is 1.25-1.55 mm, and the bead core has a hexagonal shape in cross-section having a compact unit structure of 7 steel wire windings over not less than 80% of full circumference. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     The invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein: 
     FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an embodiment of the strand structure in the conventional bead core; 
     FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view taken along a line II--II of FIG. 1; 
     FIG. 3 is a schematic view illustrating a relation between a distance between center points of adjacent steel wire windings in a bead core and a diameter of a steel wire; 
     FIG. 4 is a partially side view of a monostrand bead core illustrating a length (L) overlapping a winding start point of a steel wire with a winding terminal point thereof; and 
     FIGS. 5 to 8 are cross-sectional views of various embodiments of the bead core according to the invention taken along an axial direction of a tire, respectively. 
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     In the pneumatic radial tire for a small-size passenger car according to the invention, the bead core is formed as a monostrand bead core having a compact unit structure of 3 to 10 steel wire windings in cross-section, whereby the unbalance level of the tire is improved to bring about the improvement of tire uniformity and the rise of tenacity utilization. When the number of steel wire windings in the cross-section of the bead core is less than 3, the compact unit structure can not be formed. When it exceeds 10, there are caused problems such as an increase in weight, difficulty of rim assembling and the like. 
     As shown in FIG. 3, the steel wire used in the bead core has a diameter (D) of 1.2-2.2 mm, preferably 1.25-1.55 mm, while a ratio of distance between center points of adjacent steel wire windings in the bead core (H) to the diameter (D) of the steel wire is within a range of 1.01-1.2, preferably 1.05-1.15. When the diameter D of the steel wire is less than 1.2 mm, sufficient rigidity and strength of the bead core can not be obtained. When it exceeds 2.2 mm, the weight is undesirably increased and the rigidity of the bead core is excessively raised to degrade the rim assembling property or rim fitness. On the other hand, when the ratio H/D is less than 1.01, the rigidity of the bead core having a ring shape becomes too large and the rim assembling property is degraded. When it exceeds 1.2, the deformation of the bead core becomes undesirably large during tire-building and vulcanization steps to degrade the tire uniformity. 
     In the monostrand bead core according to the invention, the overlapping length (L) between the winding start point of the steel wire and the winding terminal point thereof is a length shown in FIG. 4 and satisfies the above equation, preferably the following equation: 
     
         1.0×10.sup.2 ×πr.sup.2 ×(f/A)≧L≧5.0×10×πr.sup.2 ×(f/A). 
    
     In this equation, the drawing force A (kgf) of the steel wire from the coating rubber is a value obtained by drawing the steel wire from a rubberized sample of 50 mm in length at a drawing rate of 200 mm/min according to ASTM-D2229. 
     When the length L is less than 4.0×10×πr 2  X (f/A), the winding terminal portion is drawn out due to peeling from the coating rubber, so that the winding terminal portion of the steel wire can not contribute to the total tenacity of the bead core and hence the tenacity utilization of the bead core is decreased to lower the safety factor of the tire. When the winding number of the steel wire is increased in order to prevent the lowering of the safety factor, the weight of the bead portion is undesirably increased. 
     On the other hand, when the length L exceeds 1.0×10 2  ×πr 2  ×(f/A), the weight and hence the cost is undesirably increased without changing the tenacity utilization of the bead core, and also the tire uniformity is degraded. 
     According to the invention, the tire size of the pneumatic radial tire is preferable to be not more than 13 inches. If the tire size exceeds 13 inches, the strength becomes insufficient in the structure of the bead core according to the invention. 
     Furthermore, the cross-sectional shape of the bead core is rendered into a hexagonal shape having a compact unit structure of 7 steel wire windings over not less than 80% of full circumference, whereby the shape stability in the tire building and vulcanization steps is considerably improved. As a result, the improvement of tire uniformity and the rise of tenacity utilization are obtained. 
     By rationalizing the formation of compact hexagonal structure of monostrand and the overlapping length L between the winding starting point and the winding terminal point as mentioned above, the strength loss can be controlled to approximately zero and also the weight reduction of the tire and the reduction of the production cost can be attained. 
     The following examples are given in illustration of the invention and are not intended as limitations thereof. 
     Various test tires having tire sizes of 155/65R12 and 175/70R13 are prepared by adopting structures shown in FIGS. 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8 as a cross-sectional shape of the bead core and varying the diameter D, tensile strength f, drawing force A and overlapping length L of the steel wire, and the ratio H/D of distance between centers of adjacent steel wire windings to wire diameter as shown in Table 1. 
     Then, the rim assembling property of the bead core, steering stability and tire breaking pressure Pmax are measured with respect to these tires to obtain results as shown in Table 1. 
     Rim Assembling Property 
     Ten tires of each of these test tires are assembled into rims of 12×4.00 B or 5J-13, respectively, to measure an average rim-assembling time t (sec) per one tire. When the rim-assembling time in the tire of Comparative Example 1 is t 0 , the rim assembling property of each tire is evaluated by an equation of (t 0  /t)×100 and represented by an index value. The larger the index value, the better the property. Moreover, there is no problem when the index value is not less than 80. 
     Steering Stability 
     Steering stability is evaluated by a feeling test of a test driver when the tire is mounted on a small-size passenger car and actually run on road. It is represented by an index on the basis that the tire of Comparative Example 1 is 100. The larger the index value, the better the result. 
     Tire Breaking Pressure 
     Each of the test tires having a tire size of 175/70R13 is pressurized through the supply of water to measure a pressure Pmax in the breaking of the bead portion. 
     
                                           TABLE 1(a)__________________________________________________________________________       Compar-            Compar-  Compar-                          Compar-  Compar-  Compar-                                                 Compar-       ative            ative                 Exam-                     ative                          ative                               Exam-                                   ative                                        Exam-                                            ative                                                 ative                                                      Exam-       Example            Example                 ple Example                          Example                               ple Example                                        ple Example                                                 Example                                                      ple       1    2    1   3    4    2   5    3   6    7    4__________________________________________________________________________Steel   Diameter D       0.96 1.40 1.40                     1.40 1.40 1.40                                   1.40 1.40                                            1.40 1.40 1.40wire   (mm)   Tensile strength f       200  190  190 190  190  190 190  190 190  190  190   (kgf/mm.sup.2)   Drawing force A       104.5            140.5                 140.5                     140.5                          140.5                               140.5                                   140.5                                        140.5                                            140.5                                                 140.5                                                      140.5   (kgf)Bead   Structure       FIG. 2            FIG. 5                 FIG. 5                     FIG. 5                          FIG. 5                               FIG. 5                                   FIG. 6                                        FIG. 6                                            FIG. 6                                                 FIG.                                                      FIG. 6core   Overlapping       70   110  110 110  30   160 110  110 110  30   160   length L   (mm)   4.0 × 10 ×       55.4 83.3 83.3                     83.3 83.3 83.3                                   83.3 83.3                                            83.3 83.3 83.3   πr.sup.2 × (f/A)   H/D      1.30 1.002                 1.15                     1.25 1.15 1.15                                   1.003                                        1.14                                            1.28 1.14 1.14Rim assembling property       100  55   101 110  100  101 53   99  108  100  99(index)Steering stability       100  109  108 96   108  109 107  105 93   105  104(index)Tire breaking       18.4 13.9 13.8                     13.7 11.8 13.9                                   15.0 14.8                                            14.8 12.0 14.9pressure Pmax (kgf/cm.sup.2)__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
     
                                           TABLE 1(b)__________________________________________________________________________             Compar-  Compar-                           Compar-          Compar-                                                 Compar-             ative                  Exam-                      ative                           ative                                Exam-                                    Exam-                                        Exam-                                            ative                                                 ative                                                      Exam-             Example                  ple Example                           Example                                ple ple ple Example                                                 Example                                                      ple             8    5   9    10   6   7   8   11   12   9__________________________________________________________________________Steel    Diameter D    1.20 1.20                      1.20 1.20 1.20                                    1.4 1.4 1.6  1.4  1.4wire    (mm)    Tensile strength f             195  195 195  195  195 190 190 184  190  190    (kgf/mm.sup.2)    Drawing force A             120.3                  120.3                      120.3                           120.3                                120.3                                    143.0                                        143.0                                            163.0                                                 143.0                                                      143.0    (kgf)Bead    Structure     FIG. 8                  FIG. 8                      FIG. 8                           FIG. 8                                FIG. 8                                    FIG. 8                                        FIG. 7                                            FIG. 8                                                 FIG.                                                      FIG. 8core    Overlapping   110  110 110  20   180 110 110 110  50   90    length L (mm)    4.0 × 10 × πr.sup.2 × (f/A)             73.3 73.3                      73.3 73.3 73.3                                    81.8                                        81.8                                            90.8 81.8 81.8    H/D           1.002                  1.14                      1.27 1.14 1.14                                    1.14                                        1.14                                            1.12 1.14 1.14Rim assembling property             75   103 112  104  104 99  98  78   98   99(index)Steering stability             107  105 91   104  103 120 101 119  119  121(index)Tire breaking     15.0 14.9                      14.8 12.7 15.0                                    19.2                                        16.3                                            19.8 13.0 18.8pressure Pmax (kgf/cm.sup.2)__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
     As mentioned above, in the pneumatic tire for the small-size passenger car according to the invention, steering stability can be improved by rendering the bead core in the bead portion into a monostrand bead core of a special structure without causing the lowering of tire breaking pressure (safety factor of tire) and degrading the rim assembling property. Furthermore, the loss of the strength in the bead core can be controlled to approximately zero, whereby the extra use of the steel wire can be controlled and the weight reduction of the tire and the reduction of the cost can be attained and the production efficiency can be improved.