Abstract:
A system for supporting and adjusting the position of an object in a vacuum includes inner and outer support rings that are connected by flexible mounts that are compliant along one axis and stiff along other axes, and drivers extending through the wall of the vacuum chamber that move the supports independently along their respective axes. At least the inner support is clamped after adjustment by a clamp that exerts a strong clamping pressure while exerting transverse force only less than a threshold selected to avoid motion after adjustment.

Description:
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION 
     The field of the invention is that of vacuum technology, and in particular that of electron beam technology. 
     Electron beam (e-beam) lithography tools are commonly used in semiconductor manufacturing to form sub-micron shapes on a semiconductor wafer. Shapes are formed by directing a beam of electrons from a source at one end of a column onto a photoresistive layer on a substrate at an opposite end of the column. A typical substrate may be 200 mm-300 mm in diameter or larger. These submicron shapes may be formed either by writing the shape directly onto a photoresistive layer on the substrate, wherein the substrate is a semiconductor wafer; or, by writing the shape onto a photoresistive layer on a substrate which is used as a mask, subsequently, to print the shape onto the semiconductor wafer. 
     Further, there are two broad types of writing modes used in electron beam lithography. The first type is referred to as “blind mode” or a “dead reckoning mode” and is commonly used in mask making. In the blind mode, the substrate is a featureless blank coated with resist and all of the patterns are placed by dead reckoning. The second mode, which may be referred to as the “registered write mode” or a “direct write mode,” is commonly used in direct write applications, i.e. writing directly onto a semiconductor wafer, in what are referred to as device fabrication runs. In the registered write mode case, the patterns must be precisely located relative to previous levels which requires registration targets built into each level and the substrate as well. Regardless of the mode employed, accurately placing or repeating sub-micron shapes at precise locations across a distance of 200-300 mm demands precise beam registration. 
     However, even if the beam is registered adequately when pattern printing begins, during the course of writing the pattern, the e-beam may exhibit what is referred to as drift, i.e., exhibiting increasing inaccuracy in one direction as time passes. So, in order to maintain adequate precision, pattern writing may be interrupted periodically, depending on the particular tool&#39;s inherent e-beam drift, to check tool registration and, whenever registration error exceeds an acceptable tolerance, to adjust the beam. 
     Normally, the substrate is held on a stage opposite (beneath) the beam source and this registration measurement involves diverting the stage to position a registration target under the beam. Then, the beam is scanned over the registration target, the target&#39;s location is measured and the target&#39;s measured location is compared against an expected result. Any measured errors are corrected by adjusting the beam or adjusting stage positional controls. Then, the stage is returned to its former position to resume writing the mask pattern. This measurement and reregistration can be time consuming. 
     Furthermore, for this e-beam registration approach, the registration measurement takes place at a stage location other than where the pattern is actually written. Consequently, even after measuring and correcting errors, moving the stage back into position from the measurement area may actually introduce errors, such as from the stage slipping or from other move related stresses. Also, to assure complete accuracy, the beam should be reregistered, frequently, preferably at each field. However, when throughput is a consideration, as it nearly always is, it is impractical to correct the beam registration prior to printing each field. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 6,437,347, entitled “Target Locking System for Electron Beam Lithography” to Hartley et al., teaches an e-beam exposure system that may use the invention in its calibration subsystem. This system uses a field locking target that includes alignment marks. 
     The &#39;347 patent shows an e-beam lithographic system capable of in situ registration. The preferred system is a Variable Axis Immersion Lens (VAIL) e-beam system and is a double hierarchy deflection system. A controllable stage moves a substrate with respect to the beam axis placing the intended substrate writing field within an aperture on a field locking target. The field locking target is located between the optics section and the substrate and the aperture is sized to permit the beam to write the field. The field locking target includes alignment marks around the aperture. A differential interferometric system measures the relative positions of the field locking target and the stage. As the stage is moving into position for writing a field, the beam is swept to hit the alignment marks, checking system alignment. The beam control data (coil currents and electrostatic deflection plate voltages) required to hit the marks are stored, and drift correction values calculated and the field beam control data adjusted accordingly. 
     FIG. 5 shows a cross-sectional diagram of a typical e-beam lithography system  500 . This system includes an optics section  502  with a registration focus coil  504   a , an autofocus coil  504   b , beam deflection coils  506 ,  508 , a projection lens axis shifting yoke  510  and beam deflection plates  511 . 
     An e-beam source  90  emits a beam represented by arrow  512 , which, during writing, travels to a target field on a substrate held on carrier  514 . Autofocus coil  504   b  adjusts beam focus for target height variations resulting from substrate imperfections, thickness variations, etc. In the preferred VAIL lens system, double deflection yokes  506 ,  508  magnetically deflect the beam  512 ; and axis shifting coil  510  shifts the variable axis of the projection lens to follow the deflected beam  512 . The relatively slow magnetic deflection from coils  506 ,  508  determines the subfield location, while within the subfield, the beam  512  is deflected by the high speed electrostatic deflection plates  511 . 
     A passive field locking target  516  permits the beam  512  to write the pattern in the substrate&#39;s target field through an aperture  518 . The preferred aperture is rectangular and is large enough to permit writing an entire field. During normal pattern writing, substrate subfields are placed within the field locking target aperture  518  and electrostatic deflection is used to write spots which form the pattern shapes. During registration, the subfield is defined as being over marks on the field locking target  516  adjacent to the aperture  518 ; and, the beam is deflected accordingly, as represented by arrows  512 ′. Then, the marks on the field locking target  516  are scanned, in situ, with the electrostatic deflection, to provide near real time positional feedback information. 
     For tracking and selecting stage location, the e-beam system  500  includes a differential interferometric system  520 . The interferometric system  520  directs a laser, represented by arrows  522 , to laser targets  524  and  524 ′ to measure the relative position of the field locking target  516  to the stage mirror assembly  526 . Laser target  524  is mechanically coupled to field locking target  516  and laser target  524 ′ is attached to a stage mirror assembly  526 . The carrier  514  is kinematically clamped to the stage mirror assembly  526  at points  528 . The stage mirror assembly  526 , in turn, is flexure mounted to a stage base  530  at points  532 . An x or y drive  534  is attached to an appropriate side of the stage base  530  to drive the stage, typically under computer control, in the x or y direction; and, once in place, to lock the stage in place. A mechanical centering adjustment  536  provides a fine adjustment for the field locking target  516  to precisely place it with respect to the beam. 
     There is a need for a system in which the position of the electron beam in space is more directly related to the workpiece. In particular, the position of the workpiece being illuminated with a pattern by the beam must be repeatably located in space in order to align the various components of the pattern being written. 
     SUMMARY OF INVENTION 
     The present invention addresses the above-described need by providing an apparatus for relating the actual beam position with the actual mechanical position of a mechanical reference in an electron beam system. 
     A feature of the invention is the provision of a mounting plate that supports an e-beam target and a fixed laser target that is adjustable to normalize the reference laser beams. 
     Another feature is the ability for XY translation of the field locking target in a vacuum environment actuated from atmosphere. 
     Another feature of the invention is a clamping system for the application of clamping force in a vacuum environment where fine adjustment of the clamping force is not possible. 
     Yet another feature of the invention is a force application system in which a sizable clamping force is applied through a member that does not permit the application of a transverse force. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS 
     FIG. 1 shows an exploded view of an embodiment of the invention. 
     FIG. 2 illustrates a detail of a beam-detecting subsystem. 
     FIG. 3 illustrates the central member of FIG. 1 in perspective. 
     FIG. 4 illustrates an assembly view of a larger portion of an apparatus. 
     FIG. 5 illustrates an overall view of a prior art system in which the invention may be advantageously used. 
     FIGS. 6A and 6B illustrate a detail of a clamping apparatus used in the invention. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     In an electron beam system including an embodiment of the invention, the electron beam is tuned and aligned relative to the optical components of the system. Once the beam has been tuned, it will be close to, but not exactly on, its nominal position. It is then necessary to establish where the (undeflected) beam actually is in space. The stage carrying the workpiece (e.g. a mask) being written on is then relative to the beam&#39;s actual position. 
     FIG. 1 shows an exploded view of a portion of an apparatus embodying the invention; this apparatus performs the functions of the electron beam reference and laser position reference in the e-beam system (e.g. the system shown in FIG.  5 ). At the bottom of FIG. 1, an outer support member (ring  120 ) moves along X-axis  101  and supports the other components. Ring  120  is flexibly mounted to a base support (and reference frame) not shown in this Figure by flexures  110 , illustratively a strap of beryllium-copper, that provide a compliant response for motion along axis  101  and are very stiff for motion in other directions, thus effectively permitting motion only along axis  101 . 
     Within ring  120 , a second inner support member (ring  220 ) is flexibly mounted to ring  120  by a pair of the same flexures,  210 . Flexures  210  are oriented along Y-axis  201  and permit compliant movement along the axis and are stiff for other motion. Rings  120  and  220  are controlled by actuators shown below in connection with FIG.  4 . 
     At the top of FIG. 1, reference plate  320  supports a number of components that provide the references needed. At the center of plate  320 , beam-detecting member  400  provides support for a beam grid that intercepts the beam, an electron detector that detects electrons scattered by the beam grid and a pair of laser mirrors that are rigidly mounted to relate the beam position to the position in space as detected by the same laser interferometer that controls the motion of the workpiece. 
     Referring to FIG. 2, there is shown a detail of FIG.  1 . The apparatus  420  in the central portion of FIG. 1 provides the essential link between the beam position and the mechanical position. The beam, passing through aperture  445  in detector  440 , is scanned over the beam grid  430  (positioned in aperture  425 ), generating electrons scattered in the backward direction (as a function of beam deflection current or voltage). Backscatter diode  440 , illustratively divided into four quadrants  442 , generates signals representing the connection between beam deflection and beam position relative to the grid. 
     In the lower portion of the unit, a vertical surface  442  represents one of the two reference laser mirrors that reflect an optical beam  122  in FIG.  5  and thereby link the position of the mechanical apparatus  400  in space to the beam deflection FIG. 3 shows a view of the central plate  320 , cut away to show the tilt control mechanism. Plate  320  rests within inner ring  220 , on three points. Two tooling balls  322  determine a tilt axis  323  and an adjustment is made by adjuster  324  up or down, thereby changing the angle of plate  320  about the tilt axis. There are a series of extension springs that clamp the plate to the nest ring. 
     FIG. 4 shows an assembly drawing of the unit. On the left and right of the Figure, members  20  and  22  provide the reference frame for the system. They are attached to a mechanically stable support that varies very little with temperature. 
     Flexures  110  that support ring  120  are attached to the reference frame. Ring  220 , in turn, is attached to ring  120  by flexures  210 . Central plate  320  rests on three points as discussed above. 
     Detector/mirror assembly  420 , linking the electron beam and the laser reference system rests in the middle of plate  320 . 
     After adjustment, rings  120  and  220  are clamped in position. FIG. 6A illustrates a clamping member, or flexure, denoted generally with the numeral  600  and indicating the apparatus comprising cap  605 , which receives releasing force to release the clamping action from lever  24 , lower base  615 , which applies an upward force that performs the clamping, and shaft  610 , connecting the upper cap and the lower base and passing through holes in the object and support. This clamp is described in more detail in copending application Docket Number FIS9-2003-0065-US1, incorporated herein by reference. 
     The clamping force clamps object  650 , which is illustratively a fixture in an electron beam system that is aligned with the beam, to support member  660 , which is part of a fixed frame that supports the object  650 . 
     In more detail, cap  605  encloses a spring  620  that supplies the clamping force. Illustratively, the clamping force is approximately 100 pounds, which opposes the X-Y driver force from their respective flexures, and vibration, etc. that acts to move the clamped object from its correct position and with the amount of friction between the reference surface  655  of the object and the corresponding reference surface  205  of the support member. 
     Spring  620  presses against the top surface of support member  660  and the inner surface of cap  605 , pushing cap  605  upward. That upward force pulls base  615  up against the lower surface of object  650  through the contact area denoted with bracket  613 , which, in turn pushes the reference surfaces together. 
     Shaft  610  serves as a tension member applying the tension or pulling force to base  615 , and has a central portion  612  which is deliberately made thin as described below. 
     Base  615  is attached to shaft  610  after object  650  is put in place, the attachment method in this illustrative case being a screw  611 . Those skilled in the art will be able to devise many other attachment methods. 
     In operation, actuator  50  presses down on lever  24 , which pivots on pin  60 . Lever  24  is positioned so that it depresses cap  605  against the restoring force of spring  620 , releasing the clamping force holding object  650  in contact with support  660 . Object  650  is supported with extension springs attached to the support  660  to negate the force due to weight. It is also desirable to maintain member  650  in its actual plane during adjustment so that we apply contact pressure during clamping to minimize motion along the Z axis. 
     With the clamping force released, it is then possible to adjust the position of member  650  by conventional adjusting means not shown in this figure to move member  650  left and right in the figure and in and out of the plane of the paper. 
     It is an advantageous feature of the invention that the extension springs support member  650  during the adjustment process, minimizing frictional force between  650  and  660 . 
     The dimension of the central portion  612  of the shaft is selected in consideration of the amount of deflection resulting from the adjustment process, and the restoring force exerted by the shaft after the adjustment is complete. 
     Ideally, the shaft would not deflect at all during the adjustment process, so that there would be no concern about the restoring force from the deflected shaft undoing the adjustment. An extremely stiff clamping system in the transverse direction would, however, exert a correspondingly strong restoring force in response to any deflection did occur, so that the restoring force would tend to undo the adjustment. 
     In a practical system, the stiffness (resulting from the material of shaft  610  and its diameter, particularly the diameter of portion  612 ) will be selected in consideration of the friction exerted by the clamp such that the deviation from the adjusted position is within the relevant error budget. 
     Referring again to FIG. 6A, cap  605  is separated from the upper surface of support  660  by a gap denoted by bracket  607 , nominally 2 mm. There are two plungers per clamp, and their deflections are quite different (typically by a ratio of 2:1) due to their position along the lever  24 . Lever  24  will lower base  615  by (at most) this distance. The lowered distance is also the separation between the upper surface of member  650  and the lower surface of support  660  during the adjustment process. 
     The material of the central shaft is illustratively non-magnetic type 300 stainless steel and has a nominal diameter in sections  614  and  616  (chosen for convenience) of 7.5 mm. The central portion of the shaft is reduced by electric discharge machining (Wire EDM), a technique that allows for small cross sections of less than 1 mm, or by another method to a square cross section 1.5 mm on a side over a distance of about 20 mm. These dimensions are not critical and may be adjusted in view of the stiffness of the material and the magnitude of the allowed restoring force. In the example illustrated, the transverse force was selected to be less than a threshold value in order to avoid danger of sliding object  650  after the adjustment. Advantageously, the support springs mentioned above minimize this concern. 
     FIG. 6B illustrates an alternative clamping arrangement in which lever  24  deflects two clamps, having caps  605 ′. The design of this alternative will allow for the difference in deflection between the two clamps. Each clamp may apply a clamping force to the same object or to different objects, as a design choice. In the example illustrated, both inner and outer rings are clamped with similar compression force (controlled by compression springs). The release position (and force required) will vary along the lever. 
     The invention is not confined to e-beam systems and can be applied in many systems having the problem of making a position adjustment in a vacuum environment. 
     While the invention has been described in terms of a single preferred embodiment, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced in various versions within the spirit and scope of the following claims.