Abstract:
In one example, we describe a method and system for toothbrush sterilization and/or storage with better quality in terms of hygiene and convenience, where the brush head and the shaft that enter the user&#39;s mouth are never contacted by the chamber. Also, below the brush head and shaft, there is no chamber. If any drops of water were to fall off the brush head, they would fall all the way through the chamber and reside on the counter on which the chamber rests, which can be removed or cleaned easily later. In one example, we use a UV-C lamp as our sterilization technique. This selection has many advantages over the other sterilizations techniques. In one example, we use a single lamp, but that lamp is in a ring configuration (otherwise known as annular, torus, or donut), with good coverage of the toothbrush, from all angles.

Description:
RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     This application is related and gets the benefit of the priority date and filing date of the prior (provisional) U.S. patent application, titled “Toothbrush Sterilization System”, filed Jan. 31, 2014, Ser. No. 61/934,500, with the same assignee. All of the teachings of the provisional case are incorporated herein, by reference. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     Toothbrushes are proven to be important for the general health and dental health of an individual. Because of the intimacy that the user shares with this particular product, the toothbrush can be a factor which promotes or extends illnesses. Because of their frequent wet nature, the portion of the brush that the user places in his/her mouth may harbor pathogens. Even a brush used exclusively by a healthy individual may have an unhealthy germ build-up over a period of time. Such germs may come from the user&#39;s own mouth and/or from the environment in which the toothbrush is kept between uses. 
     Most toothbrushes are kept in bathrooms, which are often fertile environments for germs. In addition to being wet, it is difficult to remove all traces of food particles from a brush after usage. These organic particles may serve as a culture for the promotion of molds and bacteria. In addition to between usage cleanliness, there is a need to ensure brushes are clean prior to their initial use. Regulations do not currently exist to require a particular level of sterilization or sanitation of toothbrushes prior to packaging and sale. 
     Accordingly, there is a great need for a device that effectively sanitizes toothbrushes before and between uses by consumers. And, in fact, inventions that attempt to achieve this have been known in the literature for over a century. The vast majority of these inventions involve a toothbrush and chamber. The user returns the brush to the chamber between uses. Within the chamber resides a sterilization means. Over the years, the exact nature of this sterilization means has changed—sometimes due to technology advancements, while other times due to efficacy, safety, manufacturing cost, or convenience. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 1 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 The table below lists several inventions that 
               
               
                 are typical of various sterilization means. 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Patent No. 
                 Issue Date or 
                   
                 Sterilization 
               
               
                 or SN 
                 Publication Date 
                 Inventor 
                 Means 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 615,357 
                 6 Dec. 1898 
                 Guilfoyle 
                 Gas blanket 
               
               
                 757,885 
                 3 Aug. 1903 
                 Cochkane 
                 Liquid 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 immersion 
               
               
                 2,579,242 
                 18 Dec. 1951 
                 Pask 
                 Ultraviolet 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 lamp 
               
               
                 3,342,544 
                 18 Sep. 1963 
                 Raymond 
                 Aerosol or 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 liquid spray 
               
               
                 3,884,635 
                 20 May 1975 
                 Sloan 
                 Dryer 
               
               
                 4,400,357 
                 23 Aug. 1983 
                 Hoffman 
                 Autoclave 
               
               
                 5,725,091 
                 9 Mar. 1994 
                 Knoebel 
                 Vacuum 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     One undesirable aspect of some of the prior art is that they necessitate the bristles of the brush, or a portion of the brush in close proximity to the bristles which re-enters the user&#39;s mouth and touches on some part of the sterilization chamber, on insertion, extraction, or during the sterilization process. This undesirable contact could transfer pathogens or debris from the chamber back onto the brush and vice/versa. This causes a cross-contamination, going back-and-forth, with some residual pathogens or debris always remaining in the system. An example of this type of invention can be seen in Athon, U.S. Pat. No. 1,696,706. This invention relies on the bristles to be in frictional contact with the inside of the chamber, in order to keep the brush from falling out. Similarly, Farrar U.S. Pat. No. 2,592,131 creates a lip on which the bristles rest. The following inventions all suffer from this undesirable contact. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 2 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 The prior art with similar problems (as mentioned above). 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Pat # or SN 
                 Issue or Publ. Date 
                 Inventor 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 615,357 
                 6 Dec. 1898 
                 Guilfoyle 
               
               
                 1,070,858 
                 19 Aug. 1913 
                 Trayne 
               
               
                 1,262,465 
                 9 Apr. 1918 
                 Dohrmann 
               
               
                 1,283,403 
                 29 Oct. 1918 
                 Eustis 
               
               
                 1,486,957 
                 18 Mar. 1924 
                 England 
               
               
                 1,696,706 
                 25 Dec. 1928 
                 Athon 
               
               
                 1,743,646 
                 13 Jan. 1926 
                 Alderman 
               
               
                 2,099,336 
                 16 Nov. 1937 
                 Hart 
               
               
                 2,180,213 
                 13 Nov. 1935 
                 Willis 
               
               
                 2,280,431 
                 20 Apr. 1938 
                 Hart 
               
               
                 2,457,500 
                 28 Dec. 1948 
                 Seandura 
               
               
                 2,554,156 
                 22 May 1951 
                 Rosenthal 
               
               
                 2,592,131 
                 8 Apr. 1952 
                 Farrar 
               
               
                 2,817,104 
                 24 Dec. 1957 
                 Hartzell 
               
               
                 3,100,842 
                 13 Aug. 1963 
                 Tellefsen 
               
               
                 3,114,038 
                 10 Dec. 1963 
                 Meader 
               
               
                 3,342,544 
                 18 Sep. 1963 
                 Raymond 
               
               
                 3,309,159 
                 14 Mar. 1967 
                 Le Sueur 
               
               
                 3,353,905 
                 21 Nov. 1967 
                 Douglas 
               
               
                 3,574,879 
                 13 Apr. 1971 
                 Werding 
               
               
                 3,741,378 
                 26 Jun. 1973 
                 Parker 
               
               
                 3,748,094 
                 23 Jul. 1969 
                 Scheidell 
               
               
                 3,955,922 
                 11 May 1976 
                 Moulthrop 
               
               
                 4,088,445 
                 9 May 1978 
                 Ellis 
               
               
                 4,473,152 
                 25 Sep. 1984 
                 Jump 
               
               
                 4,585,119 
                 28 Apr. 1982 
                 Boyinton 
               
               
                 4,816,648 
                 28 Mar. 1989 
                 Dusbabek 
               
               
                 4,915,219 
                 9 Apr. 1986 
                 Ottimo 
               
               
                 4,995,509 
                 26 Feb. 1991 
                 Kornfeind 
               
               
                 5,126,572 
                 30 Jun. 1992 
                 Chu 
               
               
                 5,690,214 
                 24 Nov. 1993 
                 Gaines 
               
               
                 5,922,292 
                 13 Jul. 1999 
                 Duczek 
               
               
                 5,960,801 
                 5 Oct. 1999 
                 Vermooten 
               
               
                 6,565,819 
                 19 May 1999 
                 Herrera 
               
               
                 6,728,990 
                 4 May 2004 
                 Jones 
               
               
                 7,063,822 
                 20 Jun. 2006 
                 Goertz 
               
               
                 7,213,603 
                 8 May 2007 
                 Pinsky 
               
               
                 7,511,283 
                 31 Mar. 2009 
                 Chor 
               
               
                 7,581,638 
                 31 Aug. 2005 
                 Shaw 
               
               
                 7,838,846 
                 22 Nov. 2006 
                 Pinsky 
               
               
                 2004/0155201 A1 
                 12 Aug. 2004 
                 Russell 
               
               
                 2005/0276736 A1 
                 15 Dec. 2005 
                 Miller 
               
               
                 2006/0011209 A1 
                 19 Jan. 2006 
                 Mehes 
               
               
                 2006/0204416 A1 
                 14 Sep. 2006 
                 Hayes 
               
               
                 2007/0295916 A1 
                 27 Dec. 2007 
                 Reuben 
               
               
                 DE 19606136 A1 
                 21 Aug. 1997 
                 Fritz 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     Many of the prior art inventions necessitate the user to perform additional actions to put the brush into the chamber, remove it, or activate the sterilization cycle. For example, Fowler U.S. Pat. No. 1,074,169 teaches an enclosure that fully encloses the brush. In order to insert the brush or to remove it, the user needs to open a door to gain access. This can be inconvenient if the user is already holding a container of dentifrice in one hand. Thompson U.S. Pat. No. 1,553,648 is a typical of a class of solutions where the brush can be accessed without opening a door. In these solutions the seal between the chamber and the brush assembly is accomplished by the use of a compliant stopper or a compliant chamber. The user then needs to either hold onto the chamber to keep it steady while extracting the brush or the chamber needs to be mounted to a fixed surface, e.g., a wall. Mounting is an additional action that can be inconvenient or impractical in many environments. MacShane U.S. Pat. No. 1,708,423 requires the user to perform a separate action in order to start the sterilization process. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 3 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 The following inventions all suffer from the effect that the user 
               
               
                 needs to perform an additional action in order to load the brush 
               
               
                 into the chamber, remove it, or start the sterilization process. 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Patent # or SN 
                 Issue or Publ. Date 
                 INVENTOR 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 757,885 
                 3 Aug. 1903 
                 Cochkane 
               
               
                 827,308 
                 31 Jul. 1906 
                 Hitch 
               
               
                 880,432 
                 25 Feb. 1908 
                 Weidhaas 
               
               
                 1,051,433 
                 28 Jan. 1913 
                 Moseley 
               
               
                 1,062,961 
                 27 May 1913 
                 Funcke 
               
               
                 1,074,169 
                 30 Sep. 1913 
                 Fowler 
               
               
                 1,122,881 
                 29 Dec. 1914 
                 Dye 
               
               
                 1,212,335 
                 16 Jan. 1917 
                 Fineberg 
               
               
                 1,278,789 
                 10 Sep. 1918 
                 Thompson 
               
               
                 1,283,403 
                 29 Oct. 1918 
                 Eustis 
               
               
                 1,303,884 
                 20 May 1919 
                 Goodnow 
               
               
                 1,336,345 
                 6 Apr. 1920 
                 Lackey 
               
               
                 1,364,557 
                 4 Jan. 1921 
                 Hurley 
               
               
                 1,448,231 
                 13 Mar. 1923 
                 Morrison 
               
               
                 1,451,425 
                 10 Apr. 1923 
                 Hurley 
               
               
                 1,507,466 
                 2 Sep. 1924 
                 Collins 
               
               
                 1,553,648 
                 15 Sep. 1925 
                 Thompson 
               
               
                 1,562,348 
                 17 Nov. 1925 
                 Lockery 
               
               
                 1,625,202 
                 19 Apr. 1927 
                 Gindick 
               
               
                 1,708,423 
                 9 Apr. 1929 
                 MacShane 
               
               
                 1,811,732 
                 23 Jun. 1931 
                 Pfeifer 
               
               
                 1,981,383 
                 8 Jan. 1935 
                 Feldon 
               
               
                 1,987,472 
                 8 Jan. 1935 
                 Feldon 
               
               
                 2,099,336 
                 16 Nov. 1937 
                 Hart 
               
               
                 2,180,213 
                 14 Nov. 1939 
                 Peake 
               
               
                 2,195,935 
                 2 Apr. 1940 
                 Nuyts 
               
               
                 2,280,431 
                 21 Apr. 1942 
                 Hart 
               
               
                 2,424,036 
                 15 Jul. 1947 
                 Jackel 
               
               
                 2,457,500 
                 28 Dec. 1948 
                 Seandura 
               
               
                 2,554,156 
                 22 May 1951 
                 Rosenthal 
               
               
                 2,579,242 
                 18 Dec. 1951 
                 Pask 
               
               
                 2,584,042 
                 29 Jan. 1952 
                 Ober 
               
               
                 2,587,131 
                 26 Feb. 1952 
                 Ficken 
               
               
                 2,592,131 
                 8 Apr. 1952 
                 Farrar 
               
               
                 2,817,104 
                 24 Dec. 1957 
                 Hartzell 
               
               
                 2,822,476 
                 4 Feb. 1958 
                 Osgood 
               
               
                 3,114,038 
                 10 Dec. 1963 
                 Meader 
               
               
                 3,207,296 
                 21 Sep. 1965 
                 Goodall 
               
               
                 3,309,159 
                 14 Mar. 1967 
                 Le Sueur 
               
               
                 3,342,544 
                 19 Sep. 1967 
                 Curiel 
               
               
                 3,683,638 
                 15 Aug. 1972 
                 Devon 
               
               
                 3,748,094 
                 24 Jul. 1973 
                 Scheidell 
               
               
                 3,820,251 
                 28 Jun. 1974 
                 Abernathy 
               
               
                 3,881,868 
                 6 May 1975 
                 Duke 
               
               
                 3,884,635 
                 20 May 1975 
                 Sloan 
               
               
                 3,904,362 
                 9 Sep. 1975 
                 Dipaolo 
               
               
                 3,954,407 
                 4 May 1976 
                 Andary 
               
               
                 3,955,922 
                 11 May 1976 
                 Moulthrop 
               
               
                 4,214,657 
                 29 Jul. 1980 
                 Winston 
               
               
                 4,400,357 
                 23 Aug. 1983 
                 Hoffman 
               
               
                 4,552,728 
                 12 Nov. 1985 
                 Taylor 
               
               
                 4,570,652 
                 18 Feb. 1986 
                 Chavez 
               
               
                 4,625,119 
                 25 Nov. 1986 
                 Murdock 
               
               
                 4,740,706 
                 26 Apr. 1988 
                 Murdock 
               
               
                 4,759,383 
                 26 Jul. 1988 
                 Phillips 
               
               
                 4,803,364 
                 7 Feb. 1989 
                 Ritter 
               
               
                 4,806,770 
                 21 Feb. 1989 
                 Hylton 
               
               
                 4,816,648 
                 28 Mar. 1989 
                 Dusbabek 
               
               
                 4,845,859 
                 11 Jul. 1989 
                 Evans 
               
               
                 4,884,688 
                 5 Dec. 1989 
                 Hurst 
               
               
                 4,888,487 
                 19 Dec. 1989 
                 Ritter 
               
               
                 4,906,851 
                 6 Mar. 1990 
                 Beasley 
               
               
                 4,950,902 
                 21 Aug. 1990 
                 Ritter 
               
               
                 4,973,847 
                 27 Nov. 1990 
                 Lackey 
               
               
                 4,997,629 
                 5 Mar. 1991 
                 Marchand 
               
               
                 5,023,460 
                 11 Jun. 1991 
                 Foster 
               
               
                 5,086,916 
                 11 Feb. 1992 
                 Gray 
               
               
                 5,107,987 
                 28 Apr. 1992 
                 Palazzolo 
               
               
                 5,127,521 
                 7 Jul. 1992 
                 Bourque 
               
               
                 5,295,575 
                 22 Mar. 1994 
                 Gonzalez 
               
               
                 5,377,824 
                 3 Jan. 1995 
                 Seymour 
               
               
                 5,402,810 
                 4 Apr. 1995 
                 Donley 
               
               
                 5,405,587 
                 11 Apr. 1995 
                 Fernandez 
               
               
                 5,487,877 
                 30 Jan. 1996 
                 Choi 
               
               
                 5,566,823 
                 22 Oct. 1996 
                 Summers 
               
               
                 5,620,622 
                 15 Apr. 1997 
                 Lang 
               
               
                 5,692,603 
                 2 Dec. 1997 
                 Stotesbury 
               
               
                 5,725,091 
                 10 Mar. 1998 
                 Knoebel 
               
               
                 5,772,015 
                 30 Jun. 1998 
                 Musiel 
               
               
                 5,852,879 
                 29 Dec. 1998 
                 Schumaier 
               
               
                 5,882,613 
                 16 Mar. 1999 
                 Gipson 
               
               
                 5,919,416 
                 6 Jul. 1999 
                 Auger 
               
               
                 5,922,292 
                 13 Jul. 1999 
                 Duczek 
               
               
                 5,960,801 
                 5 Oct. 1999 
                 Vermooten 
               
               
                 6,099,813 
                 8 Aug. 2000 
                 Gipson 
               
               
                 6,119,854 
                 19 Sep. 2000 
                 Prentice 
               
               
                 6,135,279 
                 24 Oct. 2000 
                 Dryer 
               
               
                 6,213,777 
                 10 Apr. 2001 
                 Seitzinger 
               
               
                 6,253,773 
                 3 Jul. 2001 
                 Ingemann 
               
               
                 6,360,884 
                 26 Mar. 2002 
                 Smith 
               
               
                 6,558,640 
                 6 May 2003 
                 Nottingham 
               
               
                 6,601,699 
                 5 Aug. 2003 
                 Naredo 
               
               
                 6,702,113 
                 9 Mar. 2004 
                 Marino 
               
               
                 6,753,537 
                 22 Jun. 2004 
                 Woo 
               
               
                 6,874,247 
                 5 Apr. 2005 
                 Hsu 
               
               
                 6,966,441 
                 22 Nov. 2005 
                 Barham 
               
               
                 6,967,337 
                 22 Nov. 2005 
                 Fonowich 
               
               
                 7,063,822 
                 20 Jun. 2006 
                 Goertz 
               
               
                 7,213,603 
                 8 May 2007 
                 Pinsky 
               
               
                 7,951,343 
                 31 May 2011 
                 Davis 
               
               
                 8,399,853 
                 29 Mar. 2013 
                 Roiniotis 
               
               
                 2002/0031461 A1 
                 14 Mar. 2002 
                 Knipp 
               
               
                 2002/0121449 A1 
                 5 Sep. 2002 
                 Bowie 
               
               
                 2004/0129580 
                 8 Jul. 2004 
                 Cochran 
               
               
                 2004/0134800 A1 
                 15 Jul. 2004 
                 Pigeon 
               
               
                 2004/0155201 
                 12 Aug. 2004 
                 Russell 
               
               
                 2004/0155201 A1 
                 12 Aug. 2004 
                 Russell 
               
               
                 2004/0159330 A1 
                 19 Aug. 2004 
                 Anemone 
               
               
                 20050274906 A1 
                 15 Dec. 2005 
                 Riddell 
               
               
                 2006/0204416 A1 
                 14 Sep. 2006 
                 Hayes 
               
               
                 20080219883 A1 
                 11 Sep. 2008 
                 Thur 
               
               
                 20090322190 A1 
                 31 Dec. 2009 
                 Kitagawa 
               
               
                 US20120138491 
                 7 Jun. 2012 
                 Goss 
               
               
                 JP H09-225012, A 
                 2 Sep. 1997 
                 KYOJI 
               
               
                 JP H11-318566, A 
                 24 Nov. 1999 
                 KASAI KUNIO 
               
               
                 CN 202801404 U 
                 20 Mar. 2013 
                 Zhang 
               
               
                 EP0925794 A2 
                 30 Jun. 1999 
                 Beghelli 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     Hecker U.S. Pat. No. 6,123,477 teaches a sterilizer that does not include a chamber. In this invention, a second brush is used to wipe down the bristles of the toothbrush. This has the obvious shortcoming that the toothbrush is exposed to the ambient environment between sterilizations instead of being protected in a chamber. In addition, the efficacy seems highly dependent on user technique. It also is only focused on sterilization of the bristles as opposed to conditioning of all the surfaces that will enter the user&#39;s mouth. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 4 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 The table below lists inventions that teach self-contained toothbrush 
               
               
                 sterilization and have the shortcomings described above. 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Patent No. or SN 
                 Issue/Publ. Date 
                 INVENTOR 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 2,527,741 
                 31 Oct. 1950 
                 Lamonde 
               
               
                 5,832,940 
                 10 Nov. 1998 
                 Embry 
               
               
                 6,123,477 
                 26 Sep. 2000 
                 Hecker 
               
               
                 6,669,390 
                 30 Dec. 2003 
                 Porter 
               
               
                 8,168,963 
                 1 May 2012 
                 Ratcliffe 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     Lamonde, Embry, and Porter do not teach sterilization. These inventions deliver dentifrice or mouthwash. However, a sterilization fluid could be envisioned as a substitute for the dentifrice. 
     In all of the prior inventions that include a sterilization chamber, there is either contact between elements of the toothbrush that the user puts into his or her mouth (mentioned previously), or there exists portions of the chamber immediately below the bristles and toothbrush shaft that enter the mouth. The disadvantage with this is that fluid or particles that fall off the brush end up inside the chamber. Since the brush is put into the chamber immediately after usage, it goes in loaded with a certain amount of water. A drop of two of this water can fall off the brush, bringing along with it food particles, dentifrice, or even pathogens that have come from the user&#39;s mouth or the environment around the brush. 
     Some of the inventions allow for the presence of a dryer in order to drive water from the chamber (e.g. Choi U.S. Pat. No. 5,487,877). Even if the water is driven from the chamber, the particles contained within the water will remain behind. At best, this will lead to a buildup of particulates in the chamber requiring frequent cleanings. At worst, it may become a breeding ground for germs exposing the brush to a more adverse environment than if it had never entered the chamber. Many of the prior inventions rely on a completely closed chamber to ensure the sterilization means does not leak into the surrounding environment (e.g., Hurley U.S. Pat. No. 1,364,557, Eckhardt U.S. Pat. No. 6,461,568, and Barham U.S. Pat. No. 6,966,441). 
     Thus, in summary, the prior art (shown below) are design patents, or are not toothbrush sterilizers, or have some disadvantages with respect to our invention described here in this disclosure. 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 5 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 List of the related prior art, which, e.g., do not have the advantages 
               
               
                 of our invention (described here in this disclosure). 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Patent No. or SN 
                 Issue/Public. Date 
                 INVENTOR 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 615,357 
                 6 Dec. 1898 
                 Guilfoyle 
               
               
                 757,885 
                 3 Aug. 1903 
                 Cochkane 
               
               
                 827,308 
                 31 Jul. 1906 
                 Hitch 
               
               
                 880,432 
                 25 Feb. 1908 
                 Weidhaas 
               
               
                 942,058 
                 27 Feb. 1909 
                 DeGowin 
               
               
                 1,050,864 
                 21 Jan. 1913 
                 Smith 
               
               
                 1,051,433 
                 28 Jan. 1913 
                 Moseley 
               
               
                 1,062,961 
                 27 May 1913 
                 Funcke 
               
               
                 1,070,858 
                 19 Aug. 1913 
                 Trayne 
               
               
                 1,074,169 
                 30 Sep. 1913 
                 Fowler 
               
               
                 1,079,618 
                 25 Nov. 1913 
                 Trayne 
               
               
                 1,122,881 
                 29 Dec. 1914 
                 Dye 
               
               
                 1,137,651 
                 27 Apr. 1915 
                 Metivier 
               
               
                 1,212,335 
                 16 Jan. 1917 
                 Fineberg 
               
               
                 1,262,465 
                 9 Apr. 1918 
                 Dohrmann 
               
               
                 1,278,789 
                 10 Sep. 1918 
                 Thompson 
               
               
                 1,283,403 
                 29 Oct. 1918 
                 Eustis 
               
               
                 1,303,884 
                 20 May 1919 
                 Goodnow 
               
               
                 1,336,345 
                 6 Apr. 1920 
                 Lackey 
               
               
                 1,364,557 
                 4 Jan. 1921 
                 Hurley 
               
               
                 1,424,434 
                 1 Aug. 1922 
                 Ausubel 
               
               
                 1,448,231 
                 13 Mar. 1923 
                 Morrison 
               
               
                 1,451,425 
                 10 Apr. 1923 
                 Hurley 
               
               
                 1,480,814 
                 15 Jan. 1924 
                 Bright 
               
               
                 1,486,957 
                 18 Mar. 1924 
                 England 
               
               
                 1,507,466 
                 2 Sep. 1924 
                 Collins 
               
               
                 1,553,648 
                 15 Sep. 1925 
                 Thompson 
               
               
                 1,562,348 
                 17 Nov. 1925 
                 Lockery 
               
               
                 1,584,261 
                 11 May 1926 
                 Vuolo 
               
               
                 1,588,781 
                 15 Jun. 1926 
                 Stoddard 
               
               
                 1,625,202 
                 19 Apr. 1927 
                 Gindick 
               
               
                 1,696,706 
                 25 Dec. 1928 
                 Athon 
               
               
                 1,708,423 
                 9 Apr. 1929 
                 MacShane 
               
               
                 1,713,379 
                 14 May 1929 
                 Fromwiller 
               
               
                 1,743,646 
                 13 Jan. 1926 
                 Alderman 
               
               
                 1,811,732 
                 23 Jun. 1931 
                 Pfeifer 
               
               
                 1,981,383 
                 8 Jan. 1935 
                 Feldon 
               
               
                 1,987,472 
                 8 Jan. 1935 
                 Feldon 
               
               
                 2,046,606 
                 7 Jul. 1936 
                 Borba 
               
               
                 2,099,336 
                 16 Nov. 1937 
                 Hart 
               
               
                 2,180,213 
                 14 Nov. 1939 
                 Frederick Willis 
               
               
                 2,195,935 
                 2 Apr. 1940 
                 Hippolyte 
               
               
                 2,280,431 
                 21 Apr. 1942 
                 Hart 
               
               
                 2,424,036 
                 Jul. 15, 1947 
                 Victor 
               
               
                 2,448,603 
                 Sep. 7, 1948 
                 Thomas D. Kevin 
               
               
                 2,457,500 
                 Dec. 28, 1948 
                 Seandura 
               
               
                 2,527,741 
                 Oct. 31, 1950 
                 Lamonde 
               
               
                 2,554,156 
                 May 22, 1951 
                 Rosenthal 
               
               
                 2,579,242 
                 Dec. 18, 1951 
                 Pask 
               
               
                 2,584,042 
                 29 Jan. 1952 
                 Ober 
               
               
                 2,587,131 
                 Feb. 26, 1952 
                 Ficken 
               
               
                 2,592,131 
                 8 Apr. 1952 
                 Farrar 
               
               
                 2,608,294 
                 26 Aug. 1952 
                 Ward 
               
               
                 2,817,104 
                 24 Dec. 1957 
                 Hartzell 
               
               
                 2,822,476 
                 4 Feb. 1958 
                 Osgood 
               
               
                 3,100,842 
                 13 Aug. 1963 
                 Tellefsen 
               
               
                 3,114,038 
                 10 Dec. 1963 
                 Meader 
               
               
                 3,207,296 
                 21 Sep. 1965 
                 Goodall 
               
               
                 3,321,796 
                 30 May 1967 
                 Lelicoff 
               
               
                 3,309,159 
                 14 Mar. 1967 
                 Le Sueur 
               
               
                 3,342,544 
                 19 Sep. 1967 
                 Curiel 
               
               
                 3,353,905 
                 21 Nov. 1967 
                 Douglas 
               
               
                 3,371,260 
                 27 Feb. 1968 
                 Jackson 
               
               
                 3,538,616 
                 10 Nov. 1970 
                 Mailing 
               
               
                 3,574,879 
                 13 Apr. 1971 
                 Werding 
               
               
                 3,683,638 
                 15 Aug. 1972 
                 Devon 
               
               
                 3,727,748 
                 17 Apr. 1973 
                 Brown 
               
               
                 3,741,378 
                 Jun. 26, 1973 
                 Parker 
               
               
                 3,746,162 
                 Jul. 17, 1973 
                 Bridges 
               
               
                 3,748,094 
                 24 Jul. 1973 
                 Scheidell 
               
               
                 3,820,251 
                 Jun. 28, 1974 
                 Abernathy 
               
               
                 3,881,868 
                 May 6, 1975 
                 Duke 
               
               
                 3,884,635 
                 May 20, 1975 
                 Sloan 
               
               
                 3,904,362 
                 Sep. 9, 1975 
                 Dipaolo 
               
               
                 3,954,407 
                 May 4, 1976 
                 Andary 
               
               
                 3,955,922 
                 May 11, 1976 
                 Moulthrop 
               
               
                 4,021,197 
                 May 3, 1977 
                 Brooks 
               
               
                 4,088,445 
                 May 9, 1978 
                 Ellis 
               
               
                 4,121,107 
                 Oct. 17, 1978 
                 Bachmann 
               
               
                 4,121,600 
                 Oct. 24, 1978 
                 Riddick 
               
               
                 4,135,269 
                 Jan. 23, 1979 
                 Laurel L. Marston 
               
               
                 4,214,657 
                 29 Jul. 1980 
                 Winston 
               
               
                 4,219,035 
                 26 Aug. 1980 
                 Deconinck 
               
               
                 4,400,357 
                 23 Aug. 1983 
                 Hoffman 
               
               
                 4,473,152 
                 25 Sep. 1984 
                 Jump 
               
               
                 4,552,728 
                 12 Nov. 1985 
                 Taylor 
               
               
                 4,570,652 
                 18 Feb. 1986 
                 Chavez 
               
               
                 4,585,119 
                 29 Apr. 1986 
                 Boyington 
               
               
                 4,625,119 
                 25 Nov. 1986 
                 Murdock 
               
               
                 4,740,706 
                 26 Apr. 1988 
                 Murdock 
               
               
                 4,756,412 
                 12 Jul. 1988 
                 Graves 
               
               
                 4,759,383 
                 26 Jul. 1988 
                 Phillips 
               
               
                 4,803,364 
                 7 Feb. 1989 
                 Ritter 
               
               
                 4,806,770 
                 21 Feb. 1989 
                 Hylton 
               
               
                 4,816,648 
                 28 Mar. 1989 
                 Dusbabek 
               
               
                 4,817,826 
                 4 Apr. 1989 
                 Judge 
               
               
                 4,845,859 
                 11 Jul. 1989 
                 Evans 
               
               
                 4,884,688 
                 5 Dec. 1989 
                 Hurst 
               
               
                 4,888,487 
                 19 Dec. 1989 
                 Ritter 
               
               
                 4,906,851 
                 6 Mar. 1990 
                 Beasley 
               
               
                 4,915,219 
                 10 Apr. 1990 
                 Ottimo 
               
               
                 4,950,902 
                 21 Aug. 1990 
                 Ritter 
               
               
                 4,973,847 
                 27 Nov. 1990 
                 Lackey 
               
               
                 4,978,003 
                 18 Dec. 1990 
                 Foster 
               
               
                 4,995,509 
                 26 Feb. 1991 
                 Kornfeind 
               
               
                 4,995,511 
                 26 Feb. 1991 
                 Evans 
               
               
                 4,997,629 
                 5 Mar. 1991 
                 Marchand 
               
               
                 5,017,790 
                 21 May 1991 
                 Kojima 
               
               
                 5,023,460 
                 11 Jun. 1991 
                 Foster 
               
               
                 5,086,916 
                 11 Feb. 1992 
                 Gray 
               
               
                 5,107,987 
                 28 Apr. 1992 
                 Palazzolo 
               
               
                 5,126,572 
                 30 Jun. 1992 
                 Chu 
               
               
                 5,127,521 
                 7 Jul. 1992 
                 Bourque 
               
               
                 5,139,142 
                 18 Aug. 1992 
                 Simon 
               
               
                 5,145,095 
                 8 Sep. 1992 
                 Loudon 
               
               
                 5,215,193 
                 1 Jun. 1993 
                 Dennis 
               
               
                 5,295,575 
                 22 Mar. 1994 
                 Gonzalez 
               
               
                 5,333,742 
                 2 Aug. 1994 
                 Piedmont 
               
               
                 5,377,824 
                 3 Jan. 1995 
                 Seymour 
               
               
                 5,402,810 
                 4 Apr. 1995 
                 Donley 
               
               
                 5,405,587 
                 11 Apr. 1995 
                 Fernandez 
               
               
                 5,409,841 
                 25 Apr. 1995 
                 Chow 
               
               
                 5,487,877 
                 30 Jan. 1996 
                 Choi 
               
               
                 5,502,900 
                 2 Apr. 1996 
                 Hui 
               
               
                 5,522,497 
                 4 Jun. 1996 
                 Stacy 
               
               
                 5,566,823 
                 22 Oct. 1996 
                 Summers 
               
               
                 5,611,206 
                 18 Mar. 1997 
                 Sargent 
               
               
                 5,620,622 
                 15 Apr. 1997 
                 Lang 
               
               
                 5,630,505 
                 20 May 1997 
                 Garcia 
               
               
                 5,660,285 
                 26 Aug. 1997 
                 Tooma 
               
               
                 5,662,130 
                 2 Sep. 1997 
                 Wiltshire 
               
               
                 5,690,214 
                 25 Nov. 1997 
                 Gaines 
               
               
                 5,692,603 
                 2 Dec. 1997 
                 Stotesbury 
               
               
                 5,701,921 
                 30 Dec. 1997 
                 Father 
               
               
                 5,725,091 
                 10 Mar. 1998 
                 Knoebel 
               
               
                 5,772,015 
                 30 Jun. 1998 
                 Musiel 
               
               
                 5,832,940 
                 10 Nov. 1998 
                 Embry 
               
               
                 5,852,879 
                 29 Dec. 1998 
                 Schumaier 
               
               
                 5,865,195 
                 2 Feb. 1999 
                 Carter 
               
               
                 5,881,876 
                 16 Mar. 1999 
                 Nonomura 
               
               
                 5,882,613 
                 16 Mar. 1999 
                 Gipson 
               
               
                 5,919,416 
                 6 Jul. 1999 
                 Auger 
               
               
                 5,922,292 
                 13 Jul. 1999 
                 Duczek 
               
               
                 5,960,801 
                 5 Oct. 1999 
                 Vermooten 
               
               
                 6,099,813 
                 8 Aug. 2000 
                 Gipson 
               
               
                 6,119,854 
                 19 Sep. 2000 
                 Prentice 
               
               
                 6,123,477 
                 26 Sep. 2000 
                 Hecker 
               
               
                 6,135,279 
                 24 Oct. 2000 
                 Dryer 
               
               
                 6,142,318 
                 7 Nov. 2000 
                 Tooma 
               
               
                 6,186,324 
                 13 Feb. 2001 
                 Catterson 
               
               
                 6,213,777 
                 10 Apr. 2001 
                 Seitzinger 
               
               
                 6,253,773 
                 3 Jul. 2001 
                 Ingemann 
               
               
                 6,360,884 
                 26 Mar. 2002 
                 Smith 
               
               
                 6,488,942 
                 3 Dec. 2002 
                 Ingemann 
               
               
                 6,461,568 
                 8 Oct. 2002 
                 Eckhardt 
               
               
                 6,558,640 
                 6 May 2003 
                 Nottingham 
               
               
                 6,565,819 
                 20 May 2003 
                 Herrera 
               
               
                 6,601,699 
                 5 Aug. 2003 
                 Naredo 
               
               
                 6,669,390 
                 30 Dec. 2003 
                 Porter 
               
               
                 6,702,113 
                 9 Mar. 2004 
                 Marino 
               
               
                 6,722,498 
                 20 Apr. 2004 
                 Westfield 
               
               
                 6,728,990 
                 4 May 2004 
                 Jones 
               
               
                 6,769,828 
                 3 Aug. 2004 
                 Clark 
               
               
                 6,753,537 
                 22 Jun. 2004 
                 Woo 
               
               
                 6,782,999 
                 31 Aug. 2004 
                 McCoy 
               
               
                 6,861,047 
                 1 Mar. 2005 
                 Carnell 
               
               
                 6,874,247 
                 5 Apr. 2005 
                 Hsu 
               
               
                 6,935,515 
                 30 Aug. 2005 
                 Sookoo 
               
               
                 6,966,441 
                 22 Nov. 2005 
                 Barham 
               
               
                 6,967,337 
                 22 Nov. 2005 
                 Fonowich 
               
               
                 7,063,822 
                 20 Jun. 2006 
                 Goertz 
               
               
                 7,204,957 
                 17 Apr. 2007 
                 Tozer 
               
               
                 7,213,603 
                 8 May 2007 
                 Pinsky 
               
               
                 7,452,714 
                 18 Nov. 2008 
                 Eversdijk 
               
               
                 7,484,629 
                 3 Feb. 2009 
                 Cottrell 
               
               
                 7,511,283 
                 31 Mar. 2009 
                 Chor 
               
               
                 7,547,893 
                 16 Jun. 2009 
                 Tantillo 
               
               
                 7,581,638 
                 1 Sep. 2009 
                 Shaw 
               
               
                 7,838,846 
                 23 Nov. 2010 
                 Pinsky 
               
               
                 7,856,738 
                 28 Dec. 2010 
                 Camacho 
               
               
                 7,888,656 
                 15 Feb. 2011 
                 Freedgood 
               
               
                 7,951,343 
                 31 May 2011 
                 Davis 
               
               
                 8,168,963 
                 1 May 2012 
                 Ratcliffe 
               
               
                 8,235,619 
                 7 Aug. 2012 
                 Meredith 
               
               
                 8,399,853 
                 Mar. 29, 2013 
                 Roiniotis 
               
               
                 2002/0031461 A1 
                 Mar. 14, 2002 
                 Knipp 
               
               
                 2002/0121449 A1 
                 Sep. 5, 2002 
                 Bowie 
               
               
                 2004/0129580 
                 Jul. 8, 2004 
                 Cochran 
               
               
                 2004/0134800 A1 
                 Jul. 15, 2004 
                 Pigeon 
               
               
                 2004/0155201 
                 Aug. 12, 2004 
                 Russell 
               
               
                 2004/0155201 A1 
                 12 Aug. 2004 
                 Russell 
               
               
                 2004/0159330 A1 
                 Aug. 19, 2004 
                 Anemone 
               
               
                 20050274906 A1 
                 15 Dec. 2005 
                 Riddell 
               
               
                 2005/0276736 A1 
                 15 Dec. 2005 
                 Miller 
               
               
                 2006/0011209 A1 
                 19 Jan. 2006 
                 Mehes 
               
               
                 2006/0204416 A1 
                 14 Sep. 2006 
                 Hayes 
               
               
                 2007/0056864 A1 
                 15 Mar. 2007 
                 Cottrell 
               
               
                 20070295916 A1 
                 27 Dec. 2007 
                 Reuben 
               
               
                 20080219883 A1 
                 11 Sep. 2008 
                 Thur 
               
               
                 20090322190 A1 
                 31 Dec. 2009 
                 Kitagawa 
               
               
                 US20120138491 
                 7 Jun. 2012 
                 Goss 
               
               
                 JP H09-225012, A 
                 2 Sep. 1997 
                 KYOJI 
               
               
                 JP H11-318566, A 
                 24 Nov. 1999 
                 KASAI KUNIO 
               
               
                 DE 19606136 A1 
                 21 Aug. 1997 
                 Fritz 
               
               
                 CN 202801404 U 
                 20 Mar. 2013 
                 Zhang 
               
               
                 EP0925794 A2 
                 30 Jun. 1999 
                 Beghelli 
               
               
                 D231593 
                 7 May 1974 
                 Ockerman 
               
               
                 D301097 
                 2 Dec. 1983 
                 Morris 
               
               
                 D319875 
                 10 Sep. 1991 
                 Lackey 
               
               
                 D327195 
                 23 Jun. 1992 
                 Murphy 
               
               
                 D327800 
                 14 Jul. 1992 
                 Hollinger 
               
               
                 D336398 
                 15 Jun. 1993 
                 Shafer 
               
               
                 D337206 
                 13 Jul. 1993 
                 Crawford 
               
               
                 D356915 
                 4 Apr. 1995 
                 Torres 
               
               
                 D370812 
                 18 Jun. 1996 
                 Simmonds 
               
               
                 D397574 
                 1 Sep. 1998 
                 Glenton 
               
               
                 D405613 
                 16 Feb. 1999 
                 Krainsky 
               
               
                 D422822 
                 18 Apr. 2000 
                 Cayouette 
               
               
                 D440090 
                 10 Apr. 2001 
                 Lillelund 
               
               
                 D443158 
                 5 Jun. 2001 
                 Ng 
               
               
                 D468945 
                 21 Jan. 2003 
                 Dretzka 
               
               
                 D478230 
                 12 Aug. 2003 
                 Dretzka 
               
               
                 D481572 
                 20 May 2003 
                 Dretzka 
               
               
                 D482222 
                 18 Nov. 2003 
                 Dretzka 
               
               
                 D502623 
                 8 Mar. 2005 
                 Minard 
               
               
                 D523674 
                 27 Jun. 2006 
                 Starck 
               
               
                 D527461 
                 29 Aug. 2006 
                 Yue 
               
               
                 D528334 
                 19 Sep. 2006 
                 Starck 
               
               
                 D530949 
                 31 Oct. 2006 
                 Snell 
               
               
                 D531811 
                 14 Nov. 2006 
                 Cochran 
               
               
                 D538437 
                 13 Mar. 2007 
                 Yue 
               
               
                 D539582 
                 3 Apr. 2008 
                 Starck 
               
               
                 D542929 
                 15 May 2007 
                 Shin 
               
               
                 D542930 
                 15 May 2007 
                 Shin 
               
               
                 D543750 
                 5 Jun. 2007 
                 Hines 
               
               
                 D545062 
                 26 Jun. 2007 
                 Nagoya 
               
               
                 D549024 
                 21 Aug. 2007 
                 Fuentes 
               
               
                 D626364 
                 2 Nov. 2010 
                 Fretwell 
               
               
                 D648539 
                 15 Nov. 2011 
                 Wai 
               
               
                 D657986 
                 24 Apr. 2012 
                 Climer 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     However, the invention and embodiments described here, below, have not been addressed or presented, in any prior art, including all the above, with all the advantages mentioned here. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     In one embodiment, we describe a method and system where the brush head and the shaft that enter the user&#39;s mouth are never contacted by the chamber. Also, below the brush head and shaft, there is no chamber. If any drops of water were to fall off the brush head, they would fall all the way through the chamber and reside on the counter on which the chamber rests. While this does not eliminate the particulate, it ensures the particulate does not reside in a chamber, which may be inaccessible or hard to clean. All particulate can be removed from the counter during regular counter cleaning routines. 
     In one embodiment of the present invention, our sterilization means is a UV-C lamp. This selection has advantages over the other sterilizations means. Some of them are: no spilling of fluids (vs. liquid and spray sterilization), no leakage of dangerous substances into the atmosphere (vs. gas blanket sterilization), no hot surfaces (vs. autoclave sterilization), rapid (vs. drier sterilization), and quiet (vs. vacuum sterilization). One disadvantage that UV sterilization has with respect to some of the other solutions is that it utilizes light, and light is usually associated with inherent shadows. That is, if a portion of the brush head intended for sterilization is in a shadow, the efficacy of the sterilization will be greatly reduced. Some of the prior art (e.g. Pinsky U.S. Pat. No. 7,213,603) mention multiple UV lamps as a solution to get greater coverage. This, of course, directly increases manufacturing cost and would require a significant number of bulbs in order to achieve uniform coverage. Other prior art address this shortcoming by introducing reflective surfaces on the inside of the chamber. This also increases manufacturing costs. A typical method to create surfaces such as this is to sputter metal onto molded plastic surfaces. While effective, composite parts like this are difficult to recycle. 
     In the present invention, we show a single lamp, but that lamp is in a ring configuration (otherwise known as annular, torus, or donut), which is unique from the prior art. The brush end of the toothbrush is placed within the ring so that light approaches the brush head from a greater number of angles, and shadows are much reduced or eliminated. In practice, because of the end conditions of the lamp, the ring is interrupted. However, this interruption is minor (small distance) and most of the lamp retains the toroidal shape and the advantages thereof (with good coverage of the toothbrush, from all angles). 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         FIG. 1  is for one embodiment of our device, as an example, for a view of the chamber with a toothbrush nearby. 
         FIG. 2  is for one embodiment of our device, as an example, for a view of the chamber with a toothbrush in it. 
         FIG. 3  is for one embodiment of our device, as an example, for a view of the chamber with a toothbrush in the process of being inserted or extracted from it. 
         FIG. 4  is for one embodiment of our device, as an example, for a view of the chamber residing on a countertop with a toothbrush in it. 
         FIG. 5  is for one embodiment of our device, as an example, for a view of the bottom of the chamber. 
         FIG. 6  is for one embodiment of our device, as an example, for a view of the chamber with a toothbrush in it, as a partial cross section. 
         FIG. 7  is for one embodiment of our device, as an example, for a view of the cross section of the chamber with a toothbrush in it. 
         FIG. 8  is for one embodiment of our device, as an example, for a view of the chamber with a toothbrush in it. 
         FIG. 9  is for one embodiment of our device, as an example, for a view of the chamber with a toothbrush in it. 
         FIG. 10  is for one embodiment of our device, as an example, for a view of the chamber with a toothbrush in it. 
         FIG. 11  is for one embodiment of our device, as an example, for a view of the toothbrush. 
         FIG. 12  is for one embodiment of our system, as an example, for a view of the components of our system. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     The attached invention describes an electronic toothbrush sterilization system that is used by consumers. This invention introduces many new features that allow for improved cleanliness, convenience, and robustness. Toothbrush sterilization systems are known in the industry and have been available for quite some time. Originally, the toothbrushes were manual, just comprised of a handle and bristles. The sterilization source has changed over the years. 
     Originally, the brushes were immersed in a sterilization fluid (FIG. 1, Appendix 1) to kill germs present on the brush. Prior art of this technique was seen as early as 1904. Later (˜1918), gases (e.g. formaldehyde) were used (FIG. 2, Appendix 1). There has also been evidence of heat-based sterilization methods (FIG. 18, Appendix 1) and aerosol usage (FIG. 19, Appendix 1). Later (˜1940s), because of convenience and effectiveness, the sterilization source was changed to that of a light, which bathes the toothbrush in light in the UVC range (FIG. 3, Appendix 1). This light has a spectral wavelength centered roughly around 240 nm. The wavelength range of UVC light is 100-280 nm. While the light sources may emit light outside of this range (into the visible spectrum, for example), it is the light within this range that has germicidal benefits. A current product that utilizes a manual toothbrush and a UVC light is shown in  FIG. 4 , Appendix 1. 
     In the 1950s the first electronic toothbrushes were introduced. These were initially targeted toward users with reduced motor skills. Later, it became apparent that many of these devices had a greater effectiveness compared to manual brushes, when it came to cleaning teeth. The earliest brushes were plugged into an AC outlet. However, in the 1960s, battery powered versions were introduced and started being adopted widely. 
     Electronic toothbrushes can be categorized into two groups depending on the motion the bristles are driven. One group employs vibration. The majority of these vibration toothbrushes today are called ultrasonic toothbrushes, since the vibration of the bristles is above 20 kHz (which is the upper limit of human hearing) (FIG. 5, Appendix 1). 
     The second major category of electronic toothbrushes is rotational. With these, the bristles rotate continuously or oscillate in a rotating manner about an axis (FIG. 6, Appendix 1). 
     Products that sterilize electronic toothbrushes have been known for some time as well (FIG. 7 and FIG. 8, Appendix 1). In these systems, there is a charging circuit that keeps the batteries in the toothbrush handle fully charged. In addition, there is a UVC light source that shines on the bristles. In all the currently shipping products that we are aware of, the brush head is detached from the handle for the sterilization process. The bristles, along with a short section of shaft (which is defined collectively in this document as the brush head), are placed into a separate chamber that contains the UVC light source, and the light is activated. 
     The disadvantages of the current state-of-the-art electronic toothbrush sterilization systems are described below: 
     (1) When the user has finished brushing his/her teeth, the handle is returned to the charging station. This is very convenient as the station reserves some countertop real estate for the product, and the user knows precisely where the product is when they need to use it again. However, to actually sterilize the bristles, extra effort is needed to separate the brush head from the handle and place it in the sterilization chamber. While this is not a lot of extra work, it turns out that many users choose not to sterilize the brush head after each brushing. This creates the opportunity for pathogens (e.g. virus, bacteria, parasite, or fungus) to grow on the wet head of the brush, which is a terrible result. 
     (2) When the brush head is removed from the handle and placed in the sterilization container, the toothbrush is not immediately ready for use. The handle is present, but there is no brush head attached to it. The brush head needs to be removed from the sterilization container and reattached to the handle. 
     (3) When the brush head remains attached to the handle after use and is not placed in the sterilization chamber, it is exposed to the environment. This environment is typically a bathroom environment that has many sources of water flow (e.g. sinks, showers, toilets and bathtubs). These water sources aerosolize water droplets. These water droplets can transport other elements such as urine, feces, and saliva throughout the bathroom. Since the bristles are exposed to this environment, they can become inadvertently contaminated. 
     (4) In the existing devices, the sterilization chamber has a closed bottom with one opening where the brush head is inserted and removed. In addition, this chamber often has many acute internal angles within and between various parts (i.e., nooks and crannies). Bristles that are placed in this environment are wet (having just been used). This water can and does drip off the bristles and stays behind in the chamber. These pools of water, if not in direct line of sight to the UVC light source can fester and grow a community of pathogens. 
     (5) The light source in the existing sterilization chamber is either a point light source or a line light source (FIG. 9, Appendix 1). This invariably creates shadows in the bristle area, where the light is not as effective as it is not bathing the entirety of the bristles. 
     (6) The existing systems go though the same cleaning cycle regardless of the number of times the brush has been used between cleanings 
     (7) The sterilization chamber is very difficult to clean. 
     (8) The light source in the existing systems is very accessible to the user. In fact, the user can inadvertently touch the light source with his/her hand or with the brush head. This could add contaminants (e.g., oil or particulate matter) to the surface of the light, thereby reducing its emission and efficacy. 
     One embodiment of the current invention incorporates an integrated charging station and sterilization chamber (FIG. 10, Appendix 1). This base station is either corded to AC power or runs on its own internal batteries. The electronic toothbrush (FIG. 27, Appendix 1) is inserted into the base station with the brush head end down (FIG. 11, Appendix 1). Once it is inserted, the brush head is removed from the environment, which keeps it cleaner and more sterile than being left in the environment between brushings. This helps to solve the issue raised in the current art, mentioned in Section (3) above. 
     The toothbrush (FIG. 12, Appendix 1) has an internal charging coil near the brush head end. This creates a non-contact inductive coupling between this coil and a similar coil in the base (FIG. 13, Appendix 1). Once the base detects the presence of the toothbrush, the charging commences and the sterilization cycle begins. The sterilization is accomplished by means of a UVC light source within the charging station (FIG. 13, Appendix 1). This UVC light source could be a point or a line source similar to the current state of the art. In one embodiment, it is a light source that wraps around the brush head eliminating shadows mentioned in Section (5) above (FIG. 14, Appendix 1). 
     This ring light could be a mercury vapor tube light (FIG. 15, Appendix 1). It could also be a series of point light sources that wrap around the brush head. Alternatively, there could be a single light source that is brought up to and surrounds the brush head via a light pipe. To further aide in the elimination of shadows, the interior of the sterilization chamber could be made reflective. (FIG. 14, Appendix 1). Aluminum coatings have been shown to reflect UVC light very effectively. During the sterilization cycle, the UVC light turns on for a pre-determined amount of time. The amount of time could vary based on the number of brush cycles that the toothbrush has been through since the last cleaning. This addresses problem in Section (6) above. 
     The brush handle can keep track of usage and this information can be communicated to the base station via means such as RFID tracking or Bluetooth communication. Once the brush is inserted in the base, the sterilization cycle commences. Since this takes no additional effort to accomplish from the user, it addresses the shortcomings of the current products referenced in Sections (1) and (2) above. 
     The chamber of the preferred design is devoid of crevices that could become water traps. If water drips off the brush head, the water falls through the device through an opening in the bottom of the chamber (FIG. 13, Appendix 1). This addresses the current problem stated in Section (4) above. This water could reside on the countertop until it evaporates away. 
     Alternatively, there could be a hydrophilic pad that resides below the chamber (FIG. 16, Appendix 1). This pad could wick the water throughout its volume or along its surface. Because the water is spread out, it has more evaporative surface area and is lost to the environment at a significantly accelerated rate. This pad could have other functions in that it could cradle and prevent the unit from tipping over. Because the chamber is open on both ends and is lacking in crevices, it is easy to clean with a device such as a baby bottle cleaner, an attachment to the toothbrush or even a towel (FIG. 17, Appendix 1) addressing the concern of Section (7) above. 
     Since there can be a communication link between the brush and the base station, either of those could have a display to communicate information to the user (FIG. 16, Appendix 1). This display can show things like charging time remaining, sterilization time remaining, number of brushing cycles completed, life of brush head remaining, and average brushing duration, among others (FIGS. 20-23, Appendix 1). 
     When the brush is being inserted into the base station, the design is such that the bristles are prevented from touching the light source (FIG. 30, Appendix 1). The light source is also buried deep within the chamber, which minimizes the possibly of the user touching it directly. This goes to addressing problem of Section (8) mentioned above. 
     Other elements and further clarification of the invention are shown in FIGS. 24-26, 28-29, and 31-33, Appendix 1. All the foregoing could be applied to a manual as well as electrical toothbrush. 
     Appendix 1 (in 2 separate files) includes the following “Appendix 1—Figures”: FIG. 10 shows the chamber from different views. FIG. 11 shows brush to chamber docking, the placement, and the gap. FIG. 12 shows RFID chip and the cross section of the brush. FIG. 13 shows the UV light source and inside the chamber. FIG. 14 shows inside the chamber with the reflective surface, like mirror, for maximum effect. FIG. 15 shows the UV bulb, with curvature, circle shaped. FIG. 16 shows the chamber pad, its shape, and its usage, as well as indicator light and/or display options on the chamber&#39;s outside surface, for warning or information for the user, e.g., for charged left on the device, and amount of brushing time or frequency, e.g., with multiple lights or diodes, or bar shaped light or indicator, or sliding scale indicator, or colored lights, or light of varying intensity proportional to the value of the indicated parameter, e.g., light intensity proportional to the charge left on the battery, or using red light as warning for low charge indication. FIG. 17 shows chamber cleaning brush. FIG. 20 shows brush to chamber activation. FIG. 22 shows cleaning cycle sequence, for self-cleaning FIG. 23 shows charging cycle sequence. FIG. 24 shows the description and advantages of our chamber/toothbrush system and their designs/parameters/components. FIG. 25 shows cleaning procedure (Function 1). FIG. 26 shows charging procedure (Function 2). FIG. 27 shows advanced sonic brush, with components, from different angles. FIG. 28 shows the inside chamber with details. FIG. 29 shows the inside chamber with UV light source ring. FIG. 30 shows the brush placement, in motion. FIG. 31 shows the light pipe inside chamber. FIG. 32 shows the retractable cable or wire for our system, for compact and clean setup, with optional spring to retract the wire, e.g., located at the inside bottom of the chamber, with optional hook to release the spring for retraction process. FIG. 33 shows drying procedure/sequence (Function 3), with gaps for drying process, with thermal energy or radiant energy, as options, with convection, conduction, or radiation mechanism, with increased airflow, with some air coming from the gaps around the chamber&#39;s legs or feet. The units or devices for thermal energy or radiant energy can be inserted into the middle of the chamber cavity, as moveable parts, or they can be stationary, on the walls or in the middle of the chamber. 
     Appendix 2, pages 1-11, show different views of the chamber and toothbrush with more details and cross-sectional views. 
     In one embodiment, we have multiple chambers on the unit for (to hold) multiple toothbrushes, e.g., with common power supply or battery backup for the toothbrushes and UV light sources. In one embodiment, we have multiple rings for the UV light sources in the same chamber. In one embodiment, the multiple rings for the UV light sources are in parallel to each other. In one embodiment, we have multiple rings for the UV light sources parallel to the ground or countertop. In one embodiment, we have multiple rings for the UV light sources at an angle to the horizontal ground or countertop, e.g., at 15, 30, 40, 45, 55, 60, or 80 degrees, with respect to the horizontal ground. 
     In one embodiment, we have some fins or tracks or grooves on the inside body of chamber and/or on the toothbrush handle (or both) to cause some gaps between the toothbrush and inside chamber for air to flow, for better drying process and better drainage of the water, when the toothbrush is set in the chamber after each use (See, e.g., FIG. 11, Appendix 1). 
     In one embodiment, we have batteries and charging coil inside the toothbrush body, with RFID chip mounted on or inside the system, for communication with a computer, smart phone, and chamber, e.g., for transmission of the data, authentication, and identification, e.g., for display of the time of usage, remaining charge of the device, and the like, for both versions of RFID (active &amp; passive). (See, e.g., FIG. 12, Appendix 1) In one embodiment, we have Bluetooth devices for short range communications, one being installed on toothbrush and/or chamber. 
     In one embodiment, the source of the UV is inside the chamber. In one embodiment, the source of the UV is outside the chamber, e.g., coming from the fiber optics or waveguides to the chamber. In one embodiment, the light gets split to multiple rays by a splitter on its way, for a better coverage of the object to be cleaned. (See, e.g., FIG. 31, Appendix 1) In one embodiment, there is a mirror or sets of mirror or reflection surface or curved reflective surface inside the chamber, focusing the light or directing the light on the toothbrush for cleaning, e.g. spherical or cylindrical or conical shape, as concave mirror or surface, e.g., using metal coating. (See, e.g., FIG. 13, Appendix 1) 
     In one embodiment, the focus area is on focal point of the mirror. In one embodiment, the source can be a ring or thick ring or multiple rings or parallel rings or horizontal rings or array of rings or rings with various wavelengths in UV range (or diodes or lasers or other light sources). (See, e.g., FIG. 14, Appendix 1) 
     In one embodiment, the chamber cleaning brush, with multiple brush heads, exchangeable on the device or on the toothbrush body or on a separate rod or stick, is used to clean the chamber by the user. (See, e.g., FIG. 17, Appendix 1) It can have multiple brushes on the same stick or bar or rod, with different shapes, for better cleaning. 
     In one embodiment, the chamber light, menu, or display can give choices to the user for functionalities, e.g., inputting data by user, or give information or warning to user, e.g., using color lights or diodes, to indicate the charging stages for the toothbrush, or malfunction of a component, using a warning red light. (See, e.g., FIG. 20, Appendix 1) 
     FIG. 21, Appendix 1 shows cleaning cycle sequence. Note that the selective cleaning intensity is based on the frequency of the brush insertion, e.g.: The higher the frequency, the higher the intensity. This intensity (I) can be linear proportional (with k as coefficient) or non-linear proportional to the frequency value (f), for different embodiments. For example, one case may be: (I=k*f), where I is the intensity of the light, and f is the frequency or number of brushing or length of time of brushing per unit time, e.g., per week or month or day (or average value, or running-average, or cumulative average), wherein * denotes the multiplication operation. The intensity can be based on: Radiant intensity, measured in watts per steradian (W/sr), or Luminous intensity, measured in lumens per steradian (1 m/sr), or candela (cd), or Irradiance or Intensity, measured in Watts per meter squared (W/m2), or Radiance, measured in (W·sr−1·m−2). 
     In one embodiment, the charging is done by direct metal contact and wiring, with backup battery or rechargeable battery. In one embodiment, the charging is done by inductive coil, remotely, with no direct or metal contact. The material of the chamber can be any synthetic or natural material, as in the prior art, e.g., plastic. In one embodiment, the brush and contour of the inside chamber are designed such that they do not touch or cross-contaminate. (See, e.g., FIG. 30, Appendix 1) 
       FIGS. 1-11  correspond to pages 1-11 (FIGS. 1-11) of Appendix 2.  FIG. 5  is for one embodiment of our device, as an example, for a view of the chamber.  FIGS. 1-4 ,  8 - 10  are for embodiments of our device, as examples, for views of the chamber with a toothbrush.  FIG. 6  (or  FIG. 7 ) is for one embodiment of our device, as an example, for a view of the chamber with a toothbrush in it, as a cross section.  FIG. 11  is for one embodiment of our device, as an example, for a view of the toothbrush. 
       FIG. 12  is for one embodiment of our system, as an example, for a view of the components of our system, comprising: menu, manual buttons, and display; RFID, Bluetooth, and antenna; user-interface, indicator lights, and warning lights; frequency of usage, history of usage, averaging module (to average values for comparisons, for baseline values, or for history or performance values, so far), and memory; motor control; UV lamp; brush dryer; mode lights; charging circuit; and external power supply. 
     Other Embodiments are, with their Variations and Examples 
     A dental hygiene system, comprising of:
         An oral care implement with a handle at one end, a mouth care end effect at the distal end, and a shaft between the two.   The mouth care end effect and said shaft enter the user&#39;s mouth during normal usage.   A free-standing chamber for storing said oral care implement.   Said chamber contains a sterilization means.   While stored or during sterilization, if debris were to fall from said mouth care end effect or said shaft, said debris would not contact any part of said chamber.   Said mouth care end effect resides below said handle, while stored.   A heater to drive moisture from the said end effect.   The oral care implement is electronic and battery powered.   Said chamber includes a charging circuit to charge the batteries of said oral care implement.       

     A dental hygiene system, comprising of:
         An oral care implement with a handle at one end, a mouth care end effect at the distal end, and a shaft between the two.   Said mouth care end effect and said shaft enter the user&#39;s mouth during normal usage.   A free-standing chamber for storing said oral care implement, where said mouth care end effect and said shaft reside inside the chamber, while at least a portion of said handle resides outside.   Said chamber contains a sterilization means.   Said chamber does not contact said mouth care end effect, nor said shaft, when inserting, removing, or storing within said chamber.   Said oral care implement can be inserted or removed from said chamber without additional actions taken upon said chamber or said oral care implement.   Said chamber is open to the environment (gravitationally) below said mouth care end effect and said shaft, during sterilization and storage.   Said mouth care end effect resides below said handle, while stored.   A heater to drive moisture from the said end effect.   The oral care implement is electronic and battery powered.   Said chamber includes a charging circuit to charge the batteries of said oral care implement.       

     A dental hygiene system, comprising of:
         An oral care implement.   A free-standing chamber for storing said oral care implement.   Said chamber contains a sterilization means.   Said sterilization means is comprised of at least one lamp that emits light in the ultraviolet spectrum.   At least one of said lamps is a singular light source, where the majority of its geometry can be described as a torus.       

     Any variations of the above teaching are also intended to be covered by this patent application.