Abstract:
Novel phosphonium salts of N-phosphonomethylglycine are disclosed herein, having the formula ##STR1## in which R 1 , R 2 , R 3 , and R 4  are independently selected from the group consisting of C 1  -C 10  alkyl benzyl, phenyl, substituted phenyl and substituted benzyl wherein said substituents are independently selected from halogen, lower alkoxy, and lower alkyl; provided that at least one of R 1 , R 2 , R 3 , or R 4  is benzyl, substituted benzyl, or substituted phenyl. The compounds are useful as herbicides and plant growth regulants.

Description:
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending application U.S. Ser. No. 295,345, filed Aug. 24, 1981 U.S. Pat. No. 4,341,549. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     This invention is directed to novel chemical compounds and to their use as herbicides and plant growth regulants. Specifically, this invention relates to phosphonium salts of N-phosphonomethylglycine. 
     N-Phosphonomethylglycine is a well-known chemical agent, sold commercially as the mono-isopropylamine salt for herbicide applications and as the sodium salt for the growth regulation of sugar cane. The manufacturer of the salts is Monsanto Agricultural Products Company, St. Louis, Mo. Various other salts are known, including substituted ammonium salts, alkali metal salts, and alkaline earth metal salts. 
     A new class of salts of N-phosphonomethylglycine has now been discovered to be effective as postemergence herbicides and plant growth regulants. Whether a herbicidal or growth regulant effect will be achieved depends on the crop to which the salts are applied, the method of application, the type and extent of weeds present, and the application rate. Determination of the proper combination of such factors is well within the routine skill of those skilled in the art of agriculture. 
     Herbicidal effects range from partial control to complete kill of weeds or generally undesired vegetation. Partial rather than complete control is sometimes preferred for purposes of economics or minimization of accompanying crop injury (depending on the crop to be protected). Plant growth regulant effects are somewhat more varied and include defoliation and retardation of vegetative growth. 
     Defoliation can be used to enhance the growth of productive plant parts and to facilitate harvesting. This is particularly useful in flax, cotton, and bean crops. Although defoliation kills leaves, it does not harm the rest of the plant and is thus not a herbicidal action. In fact, killing the plant itself is detrimental to defoliation since leaves adhere more strongly to a dead plant. 
     The retardation of vegetative growth is useful in a variety of ways. In certain plants it causes a diminution or elimination of the normal apical dominance, leading to a shorter main stem and increased lateral branching. Smaller, bushier plants with increased resistance to drought and pest infestation are the result. Retardation of vegetative growth is also useful in turf grasses for lessening the vertical growth rate, enhancing root development, and producing a denser, sturdier turf. The retardation of turf grasses also serves to increase the interval between mowings of lawns, golf courses and similar grassy areas. In silage crops, potatoes, sugar cane, beets, grapes, melons and fruit trees, the retardation of vegetative growth increases the carbohydrate content of the plants at harvest. It is believed that growth retardation or suppression at the appropriate stage of development decreases the amount of carbohydrate available for vegetative growth and thereby enhances starch and/or sucrose content. Retardation of vegetative growth in fruit trees produces shorter branches and greater fullness of shape, and often results in lesser vertical elongation. These factors contribute to the ease of access to the orchard and simplify the fruit harvesting procedure. 
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention resides in a novel class of N-phosphonomethylglycine salts having utility in controlling undesirable vegetation and in regulating the natural growth or development of plants. These novel salts conpisting essentially of a substituted phosphonium cation and glycylmethyl phosphonate anion. These salts may be represented as having the formula ##STR2## in which R 1 , R 2 , R 3 , and R 4  are independently selected from the group consisting of C 1  -C 10  alkyl, phenyl, benzyl, substituted benzyl and substituted phenyl wherein said substituents are independently selected from halogen, lower alkoxy and lower alkyl; provided that at least one of R 1 , R 2 , R 3  or R 4  is benzyl, substituted phenyl or substituted benzyl. 
     Within the scope of the above formula, certain embodiments are preferred, namely those in which R 1 , R 2 , R 3 , and R 4  are independently selected from the group consisting of C 1  -C 6  alkyl, phenyl, benzyl, substituted phenyl wherein the substituent is chloro, lower alkyl or lower alkoxy and substituted benzyl wherein the substituted in chloro. Most preferred are those in which R 1 , R 2 , R 3 , and R 4  are identical and are selected from the group consisting of C 1  -C 4  alkyl and phenyl. However, mixed substituents are preferred where activity is obtained within the description hereinabove. 
     By lower alkyl and lower alkoxy is meant those groups having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, inclusive, in straight, branched, or cyclic configuration, for example, methyl, methoxyethyl, ethoxy, propyl, propoxy, butyl, cyclobutyl, isobutyl, butoxy and the like. 
     This invention further relates to a method of controlling undesirable vegetation, comprising applying to such vegetation in the postemergent state a herbicidally effective amount of a compound having the above formula. 
     In addition, this invention relates to a method of regulating the natural growth or development of plants, comprising applying to said plants a regulating, non-lethal amount of a compound having the above formula. 
     The term &#34;herbicidally effective amount&#34; designates any amount of the compounds disclosed herein which will kill a plant or substantially inhibit its growth. By &#34;plants&#34; is meant germinant seeds, emerging seedlings, and established vegetation, including roots and above-ground portions. 
     The term &#34;natural growth or development&#34; designates the normal life cycle of a plant in accordance with its genetics and environment, in the absence of artificial external influences. A preferred utility of the instant compounds is in increasing the sucrose yield of field grown sugarcane and sorghum. The term &#34;regulating&#34; is used herein to denote the bringing about through chemical means of any temporary or permanent modification or variation from the normal life cycle short of killing the plant. 
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     In accordance with the instant invention, weed control is achieved most effectively by applying the compounds to the weeds subsequent to their emergence from the soil. Regulation of the natural growth or development of crops, on the other hand, is achieved by applying the compounds to the crop plants or to any of their above-ground portions at approximately 4 to 10 weeks prior to harvest. For the latter effect, a growth regulating amount is used without herbicidal results. As understood by those skilled in the art, amounts effective for this purpose vary, not only with the particular material selected for treatment, but also with the regulatory effect to be achieved, the species of plant being treated and its stage of development, and whether a permanent or transient regulating effect is sought. Other factors which determine the appropriate amount include the manner of application and weather conditions such as temperature and rainfall. The resulting regulation may arise from the effect of the chemical regulant on either the physiological processes of the plant or the morphology of the plant, or from both in combination or in sequence. 
     Morphological changes are generally evidenced by changes in the size, shape, color or texture of the treated plant or any of its parts, as well as in the quantity of fruit or flowers the plant produces. Physiological changes, on the other hand, occur within the treated plant and are usually hidden from view. Changes of this type most often occur in the production, location, storage or use of chemicals naturally occurring in the plant, such as hormones. Accompanying changes in morphology may be evidence of such changes, as are various analytical procedures known to those skilled in the art. Regulatory effects occur in a number of diverse ways, varying from one plant species to the next or from one application rate to the next. 
     The compounds of this invention are readily prepared from N-phosphonomethylglycine by reacting the latter with the appropriately substituted phosphonium halide in the presence of propylene oxide. N-Phosphonomethylglycine itself can be prepared by the phosphonomethylation of glycine, the reaction of ethyl glycinate with formaldehyde and diethylphosphite, or the oxidation of the N-phosphinomethylglycine. Such methods are described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,799,758 (Franz, Mar. 26, 1974). 
     Alternatively, compounds of this invention are prepared by combining one equivalent of N-phosphonomethylglycine and one equivalent of the organic salt in methanol and water while stirring. Silver oxide, in an equivalent amount, is then added in small portions over a period of time and the stirring of the reaction mixture continued for several hours. The product can be recovered by conventional means such as filtration followed by concentration of the resulting homogenous solution. 
     The examples which follow are intended to be merely illustrative, non-limiting demonstrations of the preparation of the compounds of the instant invention and of their effectiveness in controlling undesirable vegetation and in regulating plant growth. 
    
    
     EXAMPLE 1 
     Preparation of Mono-tetra-n-butylphosphonium Salt of N-Phosphonomethylglycine 
     A sample of the mono-isopropylamine salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine was obtained from Monsanto Agricultural Products Co., St. Louis, Mo., in the form of an aqueous solution containing 41% active ingredient by weight. A 51.5 g (0.125 mole) portion of this solution was diluted with 75 ml of water and 10.4 ml of 12N hydrochloric acid (0.125 mole) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for an hour, and the solid product was filtered off. The product was washed successively with water, ethanol, and acetone, then dried in an oven. The yield was 15.8 g (75% of theoretical) of N-phosphonomethylglycine. 
     A 3.4 g (0.02 mole) portion of this material was combined with 6.8 g (0.02 mole) of tetra-n-butylphosphonium bromide and 20 ml of propylene oxide in 100 ml of water. The mixture was warmed gently at 50° C. for thirty minutes, then stripped of water and volatiles to yield 11.0 g of a clear oil with a refractive index of n D   30  =1.5851. The identity of the product was confirmed as the mono-tetra-n-butylphosphonium salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine by carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance and infrared spectroscopy. 
     EXAMPLE 2 
     Preparation of Mono-tetramethylphosphonium Salt of N-Phosphonomethylglycine 
     A 1.4 g (0.0083 mole) portion of the N-phosphonomethylglycine prepared in Example 1 was combined with 1.8 g (0.0083 mole) of tetramethylphosphonium iodide in 100 ml of water. The mixture was warmed to 50° C. and stirred for one hour. It was then cooled to 15° C. and 6 ml of propylene oxide were added. Stirring was continued at room temperature for an additional two hours. The reaction mixture was then extracted with 150 ml of diethyl ether. The aqueous phase was then stripped to yield 30 g of product which was then dissolved and stripped further with tetrahydrofuran and ether to yield 2.3 g of a solid product showing decomposition at 80° C. The identity was confirmed as the monotetramethylphosphonium salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine by carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance. 
     EXAMPLE 3 
     Preparation of Mono-tetraphenylphosphonium Salt of N-Phosphonomethylglycine 
     The procedure of Example 2 was followed, using 1.7 g (0.01 mole) of N-phosphonomethylglycine, 4.66 g (0.01 mole) of tetraphenylphosphonium iodide, and 3 ml of propylene oxide. The yield was 6.2 g of a liquid product with a refractive index of n D   30  =1.5768, confirmed by carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance to be the monotetraphenylphosphonium salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine. 
     EXAMPLE 4 
     Preparation of Mono-tributyl-2,4-dichlorobenzyl Phosphonium Salt of N-Phosphonomethylglycine 
     The procedure of Example 2 was followed using 2.11 g (0.0125 mole) of N-phosphonomethylglycine, 4.97 g (0.0125 mole) of tributyl-2,4-dichlorobenzylphosphonium chloride, and 1.1 g of propylene oxide. There was no reaction after two days. The phosphonomethylglycine was still visible (undissolved). Approximately 20 ml of the water was removed in vacuo to remove the propylene oxide. There was added to the resulting solution 0.5 g (0.0125 mole) of sodium hydroxide pellets. After solubilizing the N-phosphonomethylglycine, the solution was refluxed 1.5 hours. After stripping, the solution was titurated with methylene chloride/toluene mixture. The solution was stripped in vacuo again and titurated with 20 ml of toluene. After filtering, a white solid was received. 
     The yield was 1.6 g, melting point &gt;320° C. After stripping the toluene filtrate, the residue (7.3 g) was titurated three times with diethyl ether, decanting each time. After stripping the solvent, residue was obtained again. The yield this time was 6.6 g of viscous clear oil. The two products were combined and the volatile materials removed in vacuo. There was obtained 7.3 g of crude product. This was redissolved in water to make an homogeneous solution. The total of the aqueous solution was 16.5 g. The solution was 40% of product with 4.4% sodium chloride. 
     EXAMPLE 5 
     Preparation of Mono-Benzyltriphenyl Phosphonium Salt of N-Phosphonomethylglycine 
     There was dissolved 3.9 g (0.01 mole) of benzyltriphenyl phosphonium chloride in 0.4 g (0.022 mole) water and methanol; to this solution was added 1.7 g (0.01 mole) of ethyl-N-phosphonomethylglycine. Silver oxide (2.43 g, 0.0105 mole) was added in small portions over a one hour period. After the addition was complete the mixture was allowed to stir for an additional two hours. Silver nitrate solution showed no halogen present, nor any other precipitate with a few drops of the supernatant liquid. The silver chloride and silver oxide were filtered off and the filter cake washed with methanol. The filtrate was stripped at 25° C. There was obtained 5.5 g of a white cyrstalline solid, melting point 78°-82° C., which was hydroscopic but soluble in water or chloroform. The identify was confirmed by carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance. 25° C. There was obtained 5.5 g of a white cyrstalline solid, melting point 78°-82° C., which was hydroscopic but soluble in water or chloroform. The identity was confirmed by carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance. 
     EXAMPLE 6 
     Preparation of Mono-ethyltriphenyl Phosphonium Salt Of N-Phosphonomethylglycine 
     The phosphonium salt, ethyltriphenyl phosphonium iodide (4.2 g, 0.01 mole) was combined with ethyl-N-phosphonomethylglycine (1.7 g, 0.01 mole). Methanol (150 ml) was added and the phosphonium salt dissolved. Water (0.4 g, 0.022 mole) was then added. At room temperature silver oxide was added in portions over a one hour period. The reaction mixture was allowed to stir for 2.5 hours at room temperature. The silver iodide and excess silver oxide were filtered off and the filtrate stripped. There was obtained a yield of 4.6 g, having a melting point of 59°-68° C. Identity of the product was confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance, infrared spectroscopy, and carbon-13 nucelar magnetic resonance. 
     EXAMPLE 7 
     Preparation of Mono-methyltri-p-tolyl Phosphonium Salt of N-Phosphonomethylglycine 
     In a similar procedure as in Example 6, 4.46 g (0.01 mole) of methyltri-p-tolyl phosphonium iodide was combined with 1.7 g (0.01 mole) of N-phosphonomethylglycine, followed by the addition of methanol and water. Silver oxide was added over a period of 40 minutes. After the addition was complete, the reaction mixture was allowed to stir for 2 hours at room temperature. After filtering off the silver oxide and silver iodide the resulting filtrate was stripped at 25° C. at less than 1 mm Hg pressure. There was obtained 4.8 g of the title compound, melting point of 75°-85° C. The product was hydroscopic. Analysis was confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance, carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance, and infrared analysis. 
     EXAMPLE 8 
     Preperation of Mono-methyltri-(4-methoxyphenyl) Phosphonium Salt of N-Phosphonomethylglycine 
     Using a similar procedure as in Example 6, there was combined 5 g (0.01 mole) of methyltri-(4-methoxyphenyl) iodide and 1.7 g (0.01 mole) of N-phosphonomethylglycine. The silver oxide was added in portions over a period of 30-40 minutes. After stirring for 20 minutes at 20° C. the silver iodide and silver oxide were filtered off. The filtrate was stripped in vacuo at 25° C. and less than 1 mm Hg pressure. There was obtained a yield of 5.3 g of white powder, melting point 60°-68° C., which was hydroscopic. The structure was confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance, carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance, and infrared analysis. 
     EXAMPLE 9 
     Preparation of Mono-methyltri-(4-chlorophenyl) Phosphonium Salt of N-Phosphonomethylglycine 
     Using the same procedure as Example 6, 5.08 g (0.01 mole) of methyltri-(4-chlorophenyl) iodide was combined with 1.7 g (0.01 mole) of N-phosphonomethylglycine. Silver oxide was added in portions over a 40 minute period. After the addition was complete, the reaction mixture was allowed to stir for 2.5 hours at room temperature. The silver oxide and silver iodide were filtered off and the filtrate stripped at 25° C. at less than 1 mm Hg. There was obtained a yield of 5.5 g of the title compound, melting point of 85°-95° C., which was hydroscopic. Structure was confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance, carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance, and infrared analysis. 
     
                                           TABLE A__________________________________________________________________________TABLE OF COMPOUNDS ##STR3##                                   Physical                                   ConstantExam.                                   N.sub.D.sup.30 orNo. R.sup.1  R.sup.2  R.sup.3  R.sup.4  Melting Point__________________________________________________________________________1   n-C.sub.4 H.sub.9        n-C.sub.4 H.sub.9                 n-C.sub.4 H.sub.9                          n-C.sub.4 H.sub.9                                   1.58512   CH.sub.3 CH.sub.3 CH.sub.3 CH.sub.3 80° C.                                   decomposed3   phenyl   phenyl   phenyl   phenyl   1.57684   n-C.sub.4 H.sub.9        n-C.sub.4 H.sub.9                 n-C.sub.4 H.sub.9                          2.4-diClbenzyl                                   &gt;320° C.5   phenyl   phenyl   phenyl   benzyl   78-82° C.6   C.sub.2 H.sub.5        phenyl   phenyl   phenyl   59-68° C.7   4-CH.sub.3phenyl        4-CH.sub.3phenyl                 4-CH.sub.3phenyl                          CH.sub.3 75-85° C.8   4-CH.sub.3 Ophenyl        4-CH.sub.3 Ophenyl                 4-CH.sub.3 Ophenyl                          CH.sub.3 60-68° C.9   4-Clphenyl        4-Clphenyl                 4-Clphenyl                          CH.sub.3 88-85° C.__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
     EXAMPLE 10 
     Herbicidal Activity 
     This example demonstrates the postemergence herbicidal activity of the compounds prepared in the Examples. 
     Aluminum planting flats measuring 15.2×22.9×8.9 cm were filled to a depth of 7.6 cm with loamy sand soil, containing 50 parts per million (ppm) each of the commercial fungicide cis-N[(trichloromethyl)thio]-4-cyclohexene-1,2-dicarboximide (Captan) and 17-17-17 fertilizer (percentages of N-P 2  O 5  -K 2  O on a weight basis). Seven rows were impressed across the width of each flat and a variety of seeds of both grass and broadleaf weed species were planted in rows. The weeds species used are listed below: 
     
         ______________________________________Broadleaf weeds:A.     Annual morning glory                   Ipomoea purpureaB.     Cocklebur        Xanthium sp.C.     Jimsonweed       Datura stramoniumC.1    Sesbania         Sesbania exhaltaD.     Velvetleaf       Abutilon theophrastiE.     Mustard          Brassica sp.F.     Nightshade       Solanum sp.F.1    Field broadweed  Convolvulus arvensisF.2    Sicklepod        Cassia obtusifolraG.     Pigweed          Amaranthus sp.Grasses:H.     Yellow nutsedge  Cyperus esculentusI.     Downybrome       Bromus tectorumJ.     Foxtail          Setaria sp.Grasses:K.     Annual ryegrass  Lolium multiflorumL.     Watergrass       Echinochloa crusgalliM.     Rox-orange sorghum                   Sorghum bicolorM.1    Shattercane      Sorghum bicolorN.     Wild oat         Avena fatua______________________________________ 
    
     The broad leaf species were seeded first, and the grasses were seeded four days later. Ample seeds of each species were planted to produce 5 to 50 seedlings per row after emergence, depending on the size of each plant. 
     Ten days after the grasses were seeded, the emerged seedlings of all species were sprayed with aqueous solutions of the test compounds. The solutions were prepared to such dilutions that a spray rate of 80 gallons per acre (750 liters per hectare) gave from 0.25 to 4.0 pounds of test compound per acre (0.28 to 4.48 kilograms per hectare) as desired for each test. Additional flats not treated at all were used as standards for measuring the extent of weed control in the treated flats. 
     Nineteen days later, the test flats were compared to the standards and the weeds in each row were rated visually in terms of percent control ranging from 0% to 100%, with 0% representing the same degree of growth as the same row in the standard and 100% representing complete kill of all weeds in the row. All types of plant injury were taken into consideration. The results are shown in Tables I and II, each representing an independent series of tests. 
     
                                           TABLE I__________________________________________________________________________HERBICIDE TEST RESULTS            Percent Control     Application            Broadleaf Weeds         GrassesTest Compound     Rate (lb/A)            A  B  C  D  E  F  G AVE H I  J  K  L M  N AVE__________________________________________________________________________Mono-tetra-n-butyl-     0.5    35 40 35 40 50 30 35                                38  50                                      70 100                                             98                                               90                                                 85 65                                                      80phosphonium salt     1.0    50 70 60 60 70 70 45                                61  70                                      75 100                                            100                                               95                                                 90 70                                                      86     2.0    65 70 70 75 80 75 50                                69  75                                      80 100                                            100                                               95                                                 95 75                                                      89     3.0    70 75 80 80 90 90 60                                78  75                                      90 100                                            100                                               95                                                 98 80                                                      91     4.0    75 80 100                     95 100                           95 85                                90  85                                      100                                         100                                            100                                               98                                                 100                                                    90                                                      96__________________________________________________________________________ &#34;AVE&#34;: average 
    
     
                                           TABLE II__________________________________________________________________________HERBICIDE TEST RESULTS     Appli-     cation         Percent Control     Rate         Broadleaf Weeds          GrassesTest Compound     (lb/A)         A  B  C  D  E  F   G AVE H I  J  K  L  M  N  AVE__________________________________________________________________________Mono-tetra-n-butyl     0.25         20 40 40 10 30 30  --                              28   0                                    55 100                                          65 70 25 20 48phosphonium salt     0.5 60 60 50 30 50 50  --                              50  40                                    60 100                                          75 75 65 60 68     1.0 65 65 55 50 70 85  --                              65  45                                    70 100                                          90 100                                                90 70 81     2.0 70 75 60 55 80 95  --                              73  55                                    80 100                                          100                                             100                                                100                                                   80 88     3.0 75 80 70 70 100                        100 --                              83  65                                    100                                       100                                          100                                             100                                                100                                                   90 94Mono-tetramethyl-     0.25         55 50 25 20 60 50  --                              42  50                                    70 100                                          70 85 80 20 68phosphonium salt     0.5 70 60 40 45 75 80  --                              62  60                                    90 100                                          100                                             100                                                100                                                   50 86     1.0 80 70 50 75 90 90  --                              76  70                                    100                                       100                                          100                                             100                                                100                                                   90 94     2.0 90 80 75 90 95 100 --                              88  75                                    100                                       100                                          100                                             100                                                100                                                   95 96     3.0 100            100               100                  100                     100                        100 --                              100 90                                    100                                       100                                          100                                             100                                                100                                                   100                                                      99Mono-tetraphenyl-     0.25         10 35 10 10 15 50  --                              22   0                                    50  90                                          55 70 60 20 49phosphonium salt     0.5 35 40 25 20 30 70  --                              37  10                                    60 100                                          70 75 65 45 61     1.0 50 50 50 45 75 85  --                              59  55                                    75 100                                          85 90 90 75 81     2.0 65 60 70 70 80 90  --                              73  65                                    95 100                                          95 100                                                100                                                   85 91     3.0 75 75 100                  80 90 100 --                              87  75                                    100                                       100                                          100                                             100                                                100                                                   95 96Mono-tributyl-2,4     1.0 35 30    60 50     35                              44   0                                    20  70                                          20 20  0 23dichlorobenzyl     1.0        50*      40**                   .sup. 30.sup.aphosphonium salt     2.0 45 50 65 100                     65 65  55                              64  35                                    30  85                                          45 40 55 20 39Mono-benzyl-     0.25          0  0    30 30     25                              20   0                                    25  55                                           0  0     0 13triphenyl 0.25       0*      .sup. 26.sup.b          .sup. 10.sup.aphosphonium salt     0.5 20 35 35 45 45 40  35                              36  35                                    40  80                                          10 20 20  0 29     1.0 45 45 40 55 60 55  40                              48  45                                    55  85                                          40 55 45 25 50     2.0 60 50 65 70 75 65  60                              63  70                                    75  90                                          70 80 85 60 75Mono-ethyl-     0.25         15 10    20 20     25                              16   0                                    20   45                                           0  0     0 11triphenyl 0.25       0*      .sup. 25.sup.b          .sup. 10.sup.aphosphonium salt     0.5 25 20 10 40 40 40  40                              31   0                                    50  65                                          20 10 20 20 26     1.0 35 35 30 50 50 60  65                              46  30                                    60  80                                          55 70 65 40 57     2.0 50 50 65 60 75 70  80                              64  60                                    75  95                                          70 80 90 80 78Mono-ethyl     0.25         10  0    20 20     10                              10  35                                     0  10                                          10  0     0  7tri-p-tolyl     0.25       0*       10**                   .sup. 20.sup.aphosphonium salt     0.5 30 20 20 30 50 20  20                              27  40                                    10  20                                          50  0 30  0 18     1.0 40 35 40 50 60 40  40                              44  50                                    20  70                                          60 20 40 10 37     2.0 50 60 70 60 70 50  75                              62  55                                    60 100                                          75 80 75 55 74Mono-methyl     0.25          0  0     0  0      0                              1    0                                     0  0  0  0     0  0tri-(4-methoxyphenyl)     0.25       0*       10**                   .sup.  0.sup.aphosphonium salt     0.5 20 35  0 35 20 20  20                              21   0                                     0  40                                          20  0 20  0 13     1.0 30 55 30 50 40 35  30                              39  30                                    20  50                                          40 20 30 10 28     2.0 45 64 45 60 55 45  50                              52  70                                    60 100                                          60 80 75 60 73Mono-methyl-     0.25          0  0     0  0     10                              8   20                                     0  0 10  0     0  1tri-(4-chlorophenyl)     .25        0*       30**                   .sup.  0.sup.aphosphonium salt     0.5 20 30 10  0 30 35  20                              21  30                                     0  60                                          20  0 10  0 15     1.0 35 40 30 30 40 40  30                              35  45                                    10  70                                          50 20 30 20 33__________________________________________________________________________ * = C.1 ** = F.1 .sup.a = M.1 .sup.b = F.2 
    
     EXAMPLE 11 
     Herbicidal Activity 
     This example demonstrates both the pre-emergence and postemergence activity of the same three compounds on a variety of grasses and broadleaf weeds at an application rate of 4 lb/A (4.48 kilograms per hectare). Many of the same weed species were used (Table III uses the same notations as Tables I and II) and the procedures were similar to those of Example 4, except that for the preemergence test, the flats were sprayed with the test chemicals the day after seeding, and injury ratings taken thirteen days later, and for the postemergence test, the flats were sprayed ten days after seeding and rated thirteen days later. The results are shown in Table III, where it is clear that the compounds are effective herbicides only when applied postemergence. 
     
                                           TABLE III__________________________________________________________________________HERBICIDE TEST RESULTSPRE- AND POSTEMERGENCE AT 4 LB/A             Broadleaf Weeds                        GrassesTest Compound     Application             A D  E  G  H J  L  N__________________________________________________________________________Mono-tetra-n-butyl     pre-emergence             0 0  0  0  0 0  0  0phosphonium salt     postemergence             70               80 95 95 75                          100                             100                                75Mono-tetramethyl-     pre-emergence             0 0  0  0  0 0  0  0phosphonium salt     postemergence             85               100                  100                     100                        85                          100                             100                                100Mono-tetraphenyl     pre-emergence             0 0  0  0  0 0  0  0phosphonium salt     postemergence             98               85 100                     90 65                          100                             95 90__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
     EXAMPLE 6 
     Plant Growth Regulant Activity 
     This example demonstrates the activity of the mono-tetra-n-butylphosphonium and mono-tetramethylphosphonium salts of N-phosphonomethylglycine in regulating the growth of sweet sorghum (Sorghum vulgare). 
     The test procedure was as follows: 
     A series of fiber pots, 5.0 inches (12.7 cm) in diameter by 5.0 inches (12.7 cm) deep, were filled with sandy loam soil which had been screened and fortified with sufficient 17-17-17 fertilizer to achieve a concentration of 150 ppm each of N, P 2  O 5 , and K 2  O. A single row of sorghum seeds was planted and the pots were placed in a greenhouse where the temperature was maintained at 27° C. during the day and 21° C. at night. Once the small seedlings emerged, they were thinned to one per pot. Suckers and tillers were removed as they appeared until the plants were treated. The pots were fertilized periodically with 17-17-17 fertilizer. 
     Nine weeks and four days after seeding, the stalk length to the uppermost visible leaf ligule was measured and the plants were sprayed with a solution of the test compound dissolved in water further containing 0.5% by weight of a polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate surfactant. The spraying system was pressurized by carbon dioxide and mounted on a bicyle-type apparatus. The test solution was sprayed at a rate of 25 gallons per acre (234 liters per hectare), and the concentration of active ingredient was pre-determined to produce application rates ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 pounds of active ingredient per acre (0.56 to 4.48 kilograms per hectare) at this spray rate. 
     Ten days later, the plants were harvested by cutting the stalks at soil level and removing all leaves and leaf-sheaths. The length of the stalks to the uppermost visible leaf ligule was again measured. These measurements and those taken on the spraying date were entered into the following formula to determine the &#34;percent stalk elongation&#34;: ##EQU1## The length of the stalks from the soil level to the uppermost node were then measured and recorded as the &#34;stalk length.&#34; The seedhead and peduncle (the portion of the stalk extending from the uppermost node to the base of the seedhead) were then removed and the &#34;fresh weight&#34; of each remaining stalk was recorded. Each stalk was then cut into pieces of about 1.5 inch (3.8 cm) in length and squeezed in a Carver press at 15,000 pounds per square inch (10,340N/cm 2 ) pressure. The &#34;quantity&#34;  of the expressed juice from each stalk was recorded as well as its &#34;total dissolved solids&#34; content in weight percent, as determined by a hand juice refractometer. The crushed stalks were then dried in a forced air oven and weighed (&#34;dry weight&#34;). 
     The results are shown in Table IV, including averaged measurments from three untreated check plants for comparison. The figures indicate a reduction in stalk elongation, fresh weight, and dry weight, and an increase in the percentage of total dissolved solids in the expressed juice, all due to the application of the test compounds. 
     
                                           TABLE IV__________________________________________________________________________SUGAR ENHANCEMENT TEST RESULTS ON SWEET SORGHUM         Percent               Stalk      JuiceTest   Application         Stalk Length                   F.W.                      D.W.                          T.D.S.                              QuantityCompound  Rate (lb/A)         Elongation               (mm)                   (g)                      (g) (%) (ml)__________________________________________________________________________Check* --     62.3  265 42.1                      3.36                          4.4 9.0Mono-tetra-  1.0    4.8   110 10.0                      1.22                          7.0 1.8n-butyl-  2.0    3.4   105 10.9                      1.23                          7.6 3.0phosphonium  4.0    5.3   160 16.3                      1.80                          3.5 7.4saltMono-tetra-  0.5    5.4   185 24.4                      3.52                          12.4                              6.6methyl-  1.0    2.3   255 26.2                      2.75                          7.0 7.6phosphonium  2.0    4.5   245 23.9                      2.19                          7.4 8.6salt__________________________________________________________________________ &#34;F.W.&#34;: fresh weight &#34;D.W.&#34;: dry weight &#34;T.D.S.&#34;: total dissolved solids *Average of three replications. 
    
     METHODS OF APPLICATION 
     For use at a field site, the compounds of the present invention are generally embodied in suitable formulations containing additional ingredients and diluent carriers to aid in their dispersal. Examples of such ingredients or carriers are water, organic solvents, dusts, granules, surface active agents, water-in-oil and oil-in-water emulsions, wetting agents, dispersing agents, and emulsifiers. The formulations generally take the form of dusts, solutions, emulsifiable concentrates, or wettable powders. 
     A. DUSTS 
     Dusts are dense powder compositions which combine the active compounds with a dense, free-flowing solid carrier. They are intended for application in dry form and are designed to settle rapidly to avoid being windborne to areas where their presence is not desired. 
     The carrier may be of mineral or vegetable origin, and is preferably an organic or inorganic powder of high bulk density, low surface area, and low liquid absorptivity. Suitable carriers include micaceous talcs, pyrophyllite, dense kaolin clays, tobacco dust, and ground calcium phosphate rock. 
     The performance of a dust is sometimes aided by the inclusion of a liquid or solid wetting agent, of ionic, anionic, or nonionic character. Preferred wetting agents include alkylbenzene and alkylnaphthalene sulfonates, sulfated fatty alcohols, amines or acid amides, long chain acid esters of sodium isothionate, esters of sodium sulfosuccinate, sulfated or sulfonated fatty acid esters, petroleum sulfonates, sulfonated vegetable oils, and ditertiary acetylenic glycols. Dispersants are also useful in the same dust compositions. Typical dispersants include methyl cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol, lignin sulfonates, polymeric alkylnaphthalene sulfonates, sodium naphthalene sulfonate, polymethylene bisnaphthalenesulfonate, and sodium-N-methyl-N-(long chain acid) taurates. 
     In addition, inert absorptive grinding aids are frequently included in dust compositions to aid in the manufacturing of the dust. Suitable grinding aids include attapulgite clay, diatomaceous silica, synthetic fine silica and synthetic calcium and magnesium silicates. 
     In typical dust compositions, carriers are usually present in concentrations of from about 30 to 90 weight percent of the total composition. The grinding aid usually constitutes about 5 to 50 weight percent, and the wetting agent up to about 1.0 weight percent. Dispersants, when present, constitute up to about 0.5 weight percent, and minor amounts of anticaking and antistatic agents may also be present. The particle size of the entire composition is usually about 30 to 50 microns. 
     B. SOLUTIONS 
     Aqueous solutions of the active compounds are prepared such that application at the rate of about 1 to about 200 gallons of solution per acre (about 9 to about 1875 liters per hectare) will provide the required amount of active ingredient. A small amount of non-phytotoxic surfactant typically between 0.05% and 0.5% by weight is usually included to improve the wetting ability of the solution and thus its distribution over the plant surface. Anionic, cationic, nonionic, ampholytic, and zwitterionic surfactants are all useful in this regard. 
     Suitable anionic surfactants include alkali metal, ammonium, and amine salts of fatty alcohol sulfates having from 8-18 carbon atoms in the fatty chain and sodium salts of alkyl benzene sulfonates having from 9 to 15 carbon atoms in the alkyl chain. Suitable cationic surfactants include dimethyl dialkyl quaternary ammonium halides with alkyl chains of 8 to 18 carbon atoms. Suitable nonionic surfactants include polyoxyethylene adducts of fatty alcohols having 10 to 18 carbon atoms, polyethylene oxide condensates of alkyl phenols with alkyl chains of 6 to 12 carbon atoms and 5 to 25 moles of ethylene oxide condensed onto each mole of alkyl phenol, and polyethylene oxide condensates of sorbitan esters with 10 to 40 moles of ethylene oxide condensed onto each mole of sorbitan ester. Suitable ampholytic surfactants include secondary and tertiary aliphatic amine derivatives with one aliphatic substituent containing 8 to 18 carbon atoms and another containing an anionic water-solubilizing group such as a sulfate or sulfonate. Sodium-3-dodecylaminopropionate and sodium-3-dodecyl amino propane sulfonate are examples. Suitable zwitterionic surfactants include derivatives of aliphatic quaternary ammonium compounds with one aliphatic substituent containing 8 to 18 carbon atoms and another containing an anionic water-solubilizing group. Examples of are 3-(N,N-dimethyl-N-hexadecylammonio)propane-1-sulfonate and 3-(N,N-dimethyl-N-hexadecylammonio)-2-hydroxy propane-1-sulfonate. 
     C. EMULSIFIABLE CONCENTRATES 
     Emulsifiable concentrates are solutions in which the active materials and an emulsifying agent are dissolved in a non-watermiscible solvent. Prior to use, the concentrate is diluted with water to form a suspended emulsion of solvent droplets. 
     Typical solvents for use in emulsifiable concentrates include weed oils, chlorinated hydrocarbons, and non-water-miscible ethers, esters, and ketones. 
     Typical emulsifying agents are anionic or nonionic surfactants, or mixtures of the two. Examples include long-chain mercaptan polyethoxy alcohols, alkylaryl polyethoxy alcohols, sorbitan fatty acid esters, polyoxyethylene ethers with sorbitan fatty acid esters, polyoxyethylene glycol esters with fatty or rosin acids, fatty alkylol amide condensates, calcium and amine salts of fatty alcohol sulfates, oil-soluble petroleum sulfonates, or preferably mixtures of these emulsifying agents. Such emulsifying agents usually comprise about 1 to 10 weight percent of the total composition. 
     Typical emulsifiable concentrates contain about 15 to 50 weight percent active material, about 40 to 82 weight percent solvent, and about 1 to 10 weight percent emulsifier. Other additives such as spreading agents and stickers can also be included. 
     D. WETTABLE POWDERS 
     Wettable powders are water-dispersible compositions containing the active material, an inert solid extender, and one or more surfactants to provide rapid wetting and prevent flocculation when suspended in water. 
     Suitable solid extenders include both natural minerals and materials derived synthetically from such minerals. Examples include kaolinites, attapulgite clay, montmorillonite clays, synthetic silicas, synthetic magnesium silicate and calcium sulfate dihydrate. 
     Suitable surfactants include both nonionic and anionic types, and function as wetting agents and dispersants. Usually one of each is included. Preferred wetting agents are alkylbenzene and alkylnaphthalene sulfonates, sulfated fatty alcohols, amines or acid amides, long chain acid esters of sodium isothionate, esters of sodium sulfosuccinate, sulfated or sulfonated fatty acid esters, petroleum sulfonates, sulfonated vegetable oils, and ditertiary acetylenic glycols. Preferred dispersants are methyl cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol, lignin sulfonates, polymeric alkylnaphthalene sulfonates, sodium naphthalene sulfonate, polymethylene bisnaphthalenesulfonate, and sodium-N-methyl-N(long chain acid) taurates. 
     Typical wettable powders contain 25 to 90 percent active material, 0.5 to 2.0 percent wetting agent, 0.25 to 5.0 percent dispersant, and from 9.25 to 74.25 weight percent inert extender. Frequently, 0.1 to 1.0 percent of the extender is replaced by a corrosion inhibitor and/or an antifoaming agent. 
     E. IN GENERAL 
     In general, any conventional method of application can be used, including common dusting or spraying equipment. The amount of active ingredient which is effective in producing the desired result, be it herbicidal or growth-regulating, depends on the nature of the plant species to be controlled and the prevailing conditions. Herbicidal effects are usually achieved at 0.1 to 50 pounds active ingredient per acre, preferably 1 to 10, while plant growth regulation is usually achieved at 0.1 to 20 pounds active ingredient per acre, preferably 0.5 to 5. It will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that compounds of lower activity will require a higher dosage than more active compounds for the same degree of control.