input
stringlengths 2.25k
4.39k
| output
sequencelengths 1
1
| id
stringlengths 40
40
|
---|---|---|
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Terribly sorry to hear that; it sounds like you won't be able to camp much in that condition. I assume you have someone coming along to help you because of your leg?' 'just a bunch of children under 5 who wont be able to gather firewood. so i desperately need at least 2' 'I see, well it sounds like you're going to need some additional food with those children. How about I provide you with some additional food and you can help me with my need for heat with firewood?'
Utterance: 'okay how i take all 3 food and 1 firewood?'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-0494ed3d653d41bcafdbd5fcaee2e941 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'so if i were to give you water what would i get ?' 'You'd be getting 1 water, 2 firewood, and 1 food' 'how much food are you willing to offer for water'
Utterance: 'We can go back to my original offer which was honestly more generous.. I get 2 Water, 1 Firewood, 1 food.. you get 1 water, 2 firewood, 2 food.. its honestly a better deal for you ๐'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-e070674510a4463b83ae255cf4ce4f24 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'It took a while to load but good.' 'Let's talk about how we can split the camping supplies' 'Ok I think we should split evenly'
Utterance: 'yes we should come to a fair deal, what are your priority items?'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-fc294020cb0841919a7e66bf3f993670 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello!๐' 'Hello, how are you?'
Utterance: 'I'm fine, let's talk about how we can come to a fair deal.'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-a7e8b4f5af314870a729f8d8c27ea89b |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Me too! ๐ What do you think about the extra supplies?' 'I recently bought two new puppies, and they are coming on the trip. I could really use the extra water for them!' 'Awww. That sounds reasonable to me. I'm hoping to have a birthday dinner for my dad on the trip, so I'd appreciate some more food and a little more firewood.'
Utterance: 'Happy birthday to your dad!! You can have all of the food if I can have all of the water. ๐'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-624b3358ee9a4d708abd4188c28f11b6 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello. I'm looking forward to striking a deal with you that makes both of us happy!' 'Sure I am waiting too!'
Utterance: 'So tell me, which is most important to you? What can't you live without?'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-df7c64b8ea8a49dcb75f218ed1aaa377 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I do need more food than firewood, If I could get 3 food and 2 firewood. You can get 3 water and 1 firewood.' 'I do need some food. I would like to get at least 1 food. You can still get 3 firewood.' 'I could use water as well, so I could get 1 water, 2 food and 2 firewood'
Utterance: 'I am good at making fire and have a starter so I can give up all the wood.'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-25101f9fe6b545b0bb1dbcd81b6be1ba |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'hi, I'm looking forward to going camping soon' 'Me too! Camping is so much fun' 'I will want to get some extra supplies before I go. '
Utterance: 'Same. My family is coming with me so I want to make sure we are extra prepared'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-879313e3cb56493d9e4ada9335706c2b |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I believe that we can help each other here.' 'hi how are you, what help you need?'
Utterance: 'Lets strike balance like 1/2 2/1 3/0'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-80d107eea8a44a0b9308aa82ef71c219 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'no, best i can offer is i get 3 firewood, 2 water and 1 food' 'No thanks.โน๏ธ' 'ok, last deal, i get 3 firewood, 1 water and 1 food'
Utterance: 'That sound fair to me since I will need plenty food and water for my climb.'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-7ffe14abdc6a48288675d6b3f514eb91 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi, ๐ can we make a deal for me having 3 water, 2 food, and 2 firewood?'
Utterance: 'no what about this, I get 3 firewood then rest is yours'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-c753402ba0cb4ef48c7c5dc0f3ff242b |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Bye then' 'Your decision could not use both of us' 'I will give you 3 firewoods and I will take 3 water and 3 food.'
Utterance: 'This is not work for me at least give me one more water package'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-77a1a8097093442b8bc53724edecb7ed |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how is your trip going? hopefully better than mine'
Utterance: 'My trip is going pretty so so too im sorry to hear that about yours!! sounds like we both are gonna need some extra stuff? I was wondering if we could start with the water? any chance i could have it all and you can have all of something else? thoughts? im open to discussion'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-1422ac57a6ea40fba6d9520f4f9205f6 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Are you prepared for the camp?' 'Yes A little.. But I would need extra camping items ' 'Ok, I do too. What do you really need?'
Utterance: 'Thanks for asking ..! I will need 3 of food, 3 of water and 2 of firewood..'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-732ae4e4c21648a3b0dd54acd0418491 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'we are cold and hungry so we need firewood and food the most, what about you?' 'I don't care about the firewood, but I would like food and water the most.' 'you can take water if i get all the firewood and some food'
Utterance: 'I'll take all the water, you can take all the firewood. What would be fair for the food?'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-332393a344ea431499bd1fd4c2272371 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'one food, three wood.' 'bro it is not a fair deal give me 2 food, one firewood 2 water' 'if you think I am not being fair can I have what you are asking for?'
Utterance: 'you told me i not fair that why i told you are not fare,3 food for me will give 3 firewood for me, give 2 water for me, other we can end the deal and both we can forget the bonus'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-d7ee6650617a48a7b25b8824670f91b5 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello hood to see a fellow camper. How are you doing today?๐' 'Hey! I'm doing great, how are you? ' 'Looking forward to doing some serious hiking with the family. bad luck on the way here we flew in and the airline loss or bags with some of our supplies and sleeping bags.โน๏ธ'
Utterance: 'oh nooo, that's terrible. do they know where they left them?'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-72fb427c14384335a4c80ee40346ec93 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I understand your preferences. If I take all of the water, 1 firewood, and 2 food your family will still have the opportunity to have a good camping trip and I can learn to survive on this trip. Please consider my request again.โน๏ธ' 'Ok - you're not being reasonable at all. If you're so incompetent at going camping, maybe you should stay home and I can take all the supplies. How's that for an excellent offer? All for me and 0 for you.' 'I think it would be good to come to a compromise. If I take all of the water and have the 2 foods, you can take all of the firewood as you originally proposed. Yet, I will have a tough time learning how to survive on a camping trip.๐ก'
Utterance: 'Again, that's not a fair compromise....You get all of what we both we want and more of another item. Let me state it to you clearly so you can understand. I WILL NOT ACCEPT THAT OFFER. There is no chance you are getting all the water now that I think about it. I will offer I get 1 water, 2 firewood, and 2 food. If you can't come up with a reasonable offer, I will just walk away and we both get nothing. I will survive because I will have skills.'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-5385577fb21f48b987f69ee56ff19577 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I would prefer to have all 3 water, but I think I can make an exception since you have offered me all 3 food ๐ Just to confirm, this means that you get 3 firewood and 1 water and I get 2 water and 3 food. Correct?' 'Yes ๐ Do you want to make a deal?' 'Sure ๐'
Utterance: 'Thanks good negotiating with you! ๐ฎ'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-45c61799f85244308152770a4ba22750 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Yes, it would.' 'I think that sounds fair. The problem is that there are 3 waters and one of us would get two and the other one. How should we sort that?' 'You can take the two water. I am not that thirsty most days.'
Utterance: 'That's very generous of you!๐ If you are sure, then I am in agreement. So we are saying, I get 3 firewood, you get 3 food and you get one water while I get two water?'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-d454887a5bb0496aaf52f748fb9e86f8 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: ' I would agree to that if I can also have two things of firewood. I am going to need a lot of wood, so I can cook the meals I am making ๐' 'I completely understand, thank you for compromising with water and food. Wished we had 4 firewoods to divide and share it equaly, may I ask how long will you be camping for? Im afraid I need 2 firewoods as well, maybe we can see who has the greater need? ' 'I am going to be camping for a couple of weeks, so I will need quite a bit. I also realized some additional water would be good, because I have some meals that need me to boil water. Maybe you can have 2 firewood in exchange for me having one of your waters? Then you would still have plenty of water, but also plenty of firewood ๐'
Utterance: 'So sorry, I just realized you did not agree to the 3 waters in exchange of 3 foods. if you want a water, i will also will need one food. just to make things more fair on my end. If not i am looking at 2 waters, 0 foods, and 1 firewood. But i am willing to compromise for 3 waters, 1 firewood, and 0 foods. and you'll get 3 foods, 2 firewoods, and 0 waters, what do you think?'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-8f1625217c55481b91ef9541915597bb |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Please don't try to order me around. ๐ก I require a majority of water.' 'Let's be reasonable here. If you are nice to me I'll be nice to you. I'll take the majority of the wood and food if you want most water.' 'Again don't patronize me. What is your main focus?'
Utterance: 'Please grow up. No one is patronizing you. I'm trying to negotiate. Don't be so emotional okay?'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-222aac4bd37645e48feb19fa3382a151 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I was planning on staying up all night and keeping my fire going all night. Honestly I could give you all the extra food if that helps you if I could please have the 3 firewood? We could split the waters' 'I'll only give you all the firewood if you give me everything else. I know it's your top priority๐ฎ' 'How about I take all the wood, give you all the food, you can have 2 waters and I can have one. Having a little extra water will help me with all the hiking we will be doing, plus since i wont be eating much I want to stay hydrated. Will that work for you>>๐'
Utterance: 'cringe โน๏ธ. Ill take one firewood and two of both water and food '
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-608535f525cd4bddbcdd50c5c6a07959 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'oh my are you going somewhere cold? I could use the water, I am going on a charity event with kids from the Make A Wish foundation. Its going to be their first time!' 'Ok I will give you 3 waters if you give me 3 firewood' 'sure i can do that, what about the food then? how much food would you need for the tip? can you hunt where you are going?'
Utterance: 'I am up to u '
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-d55da93dc8514eeb8372d1274a7f155a |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context:
Utterance: 'Who is willing to cooperate in a consensual offer so that we can all get fruitful dividends๐ก'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-293c184d952c4bd18d0b98f09751ee95 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I am in dire need of firewood myself. I was planning on bringing food that needed to be cooked over flame. ๐ฎ' 'Well maybe we can find a way to split it! This isn't a problem we can't solve. Are you in need of food too, then?' 'That would be great! I don't need food as much as I am in need of firewood, to be honest.'
Utterance: 'I brought purification tablets so I can make do with rainwater or river water. How about you?'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-8713aec8096744b0a68cb8fc5a16d119 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context:
Utterance: 'Hi, I would like to get firewood because I would like to sit by the campfire in the evening.'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-12db9148e999440199e09b0a304908ea |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello! Which item do you need the most?' 'I would love to have the Firewood the most. ' 'Unfortunately I need firewood the most too. How about I take 2 firewood, 2 food, and 1 water?'
Utterance: 'I feel that I am not getting a fair deal. '
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-eea93f05d1144b1d99cb86f37b70a93c |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I am! It is the perfect way to get away and still manage to social distance! I am worried about having enough water though, are you short on any supplies?' 'I think I'm good. I'm not 100% sure. My husband likes to do adventures on the fly. He got these water filter straw thingies from Amazon and said that if we run out of the water I packed, that we can drink the water in the lake but I don't really trust the straws.' 'Sounds like you need water too. How about you take 2 water, 1 food, and 1 firewood?'
Utterance: 'I don't know, you said you're worried about having enough water too. I'm excited to make campfires though! My kid hasn't had a campfire smore yet so I'm super excited to see his face of joy when he experiences it.'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-4943531b0a1d45c6ac13ba7eb69b5141 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context:
Utterance: 'I want to make sure I'm well prepared for camping. How would you feel if I took 2 water, 1 firewood, and 2 food?'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-d0746e45bbd84a82b412e6cb431503eb |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Well, I am pre-diabetic, so I had to do it for my health. I love food, too...especially sugar! ๐๐' 'Oh, that does change things a lot. Diabetes is a hard disease to have to deal with. So you want more firewood than water? And less food than water?' 'Well, I don't know. I think I would like more water than firewood, but yes less food than water. I'm a pretty easy going person though! ๐'
Utterance: 'Ok, let me know what you think and we will go from there. I do prefer more food and firewood than water though.'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-ba93a440b5b2423c84d04b524095b9e8 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I'll give you one of the extra food so you have a little extra to cook for everyone but I'm really gonna need all that extra water, it's going to be really hot this weekend and the folks at the capsite get to sit in the shade all day' 'Now we are making progress. But come on, I will need at least one water to make sure I'm hydrated. I wouldn't want to get heatstroke out in the woods.' 'The basic supplies include water, the additional supplies are just extra. Plus I think there's a well nearby!'
Utterance: 'Bro, come on. I've tried to accomodate your needs, but you are asking for too much.'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-29ada4cc271d493fbd36e5d7e0def971 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Firewood, due to the area that we are going to. How about you? ' 'Oh I see. You can have all 3 firewood if you are ok with me taking all 3 food.' 'Hmm, well I'd love to get some of the food. What I took 2 firewood, 1 food and 1 water? '
Utterance: 'Sorry but I really need all 3 food. All the food I brought with me has spoiled because the AC in my car broke. โน๏ธ'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-83a20e22c9cf47fa8472ceec77ec2e68 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Ok - you're not being reasonable at all. If you're so incompetent at going camping, maybe you should stay home and I can take all the supplies. How's that for an excellent offer? All for me and 0 for you.' 'I think it would be good to come to a compromise. If I take all of the water and have the 2 foods, you can take all of the firewood as you originally proposed. Yet, I will have a tough time learning how to survive on a camping trip.๐ก' 'Again, that's not a fair compromise....You get all of what we both we want and more of another item. Let me state it to you clearly so you can understand. I WILL NOT ACCEPT THAT OFFER. There is no chance you are getting all the water now that I think about it. I will offer I get 1 water, 2 firewood, and 2 food. If you can't come up with a reasonable offer, I will just walk away and we both get nothing. I will survive because I will have skills.'
Utterance: 'I think this is reasonable because you have a big family. I will accept 2 waters, 1 firewood, and 1 food. '
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-af562232c31c4893a0b77b1bb2fbc011 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Oh, well that's really nice of you. What do you propose?' 'You'll get 3 food and 2 water, and I'll take 3 firewood and 1 water. ๐' 'Hmm, I think that could definitely work! Appreciate it ๐'
Utterance: 'Sound great ๐'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-643bfa2891c14c48b031508b457e1ee0 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'How many persons are you feeding? I am feeding 2 adults and 2 children.' '2 adults and 3 children, so if I get 2 food and 1 water, you could get 1 food and 2 water? ' 'I believe we can work with 1 food and 2 waters.๐'
Utterance: 'So 1 package of firewood, 2 food and 1 water for me and 2 packages of firewood, 1 food and 2 waters for you? Sound good? '
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-e23cc56aa9c44e8583d4fe847e9b0286 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Are you sure you won't get hungry? I am open to giving you the two waters, but I want to make sure its the best deal for you. I would want 2 firewoods and 2 foods in exchange.' 'brother k , bro 2 water and 2 wire wood 1 firewood can you given?' 'I think that that is acceptable to me. I want to make sure we both understand: I get 1 Water, 2 Firewood, 2 Food Packages. You get 2 Waters, 1 Firewood, 1 Food Package. I will have to ration my water, but I think the extra comfort is worth it. Does this work for you? '
Utterance: 'bro its not profitable ratiobro gave 3 water 1 firewood, remaning you can take'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-18a105cd282c436bba2bcf9eea04873d |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I can give you more food if you like but I really need the water' 'It seems we both need the water so If you want 2 water, I would need all the food and firewood as well.' 'How about this I give you 1 package of water, 2 packages of food, and 3 packages of Firewood. You get the majority of my items'
Utterance: 'I guess that could work and seems pretty fair for all.'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-bd48c3c33863400d8c51472bc5cd406d |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello. I am very interested in the firewood and would be very willing to forfeit all the water.' 'oh really. i am willing to make a negotiation with you on that for sure. where are you plannign to camp?' 'I'm camping near a natural spring and will have all the water I need. How are you planning to eat?'
Utterance: 'i have some spare cans but i am not too worried about it. its a low prioirty for me '
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-153812004d27460ab2bad6268dfeecf4 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I need Food, what is yours?' 'I kinda need water because I get dry mouth very often. so without water it will make it hard to achieve getting other items in the wilderness.' 'Ok thats nice, I need food more because I didn't bring much and that a problem, What do you think if I give you 2 wood and you give me 2 food?'
Utterance: '๐ Well let me counter it, more beneficial to both of us, you will get 1 water, 2 food and 2 firewood as I can easily find firewood in the forest. The water due to my dry mouth illness, I need the most โน๏ธ'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-2c5642c9ac734131a6caa2d5931f353d |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I am doing well so far. ๐ What items are of preference for you today?' 'I need a lot of food today. I was advised to eat at least 4 times a day so i may need all the food packages.' 'Well that is not going to work well for my family of 8 now is it? Haha. I think we can come to some sort of agreement though.๐'
Utterance: 'What do you propose?'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-0e34a7e82bce45a4bcab2ba2145eadae |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I also need water with my medical condition I have to take lots of meds. I can give you extra firewood so you can boil more water easily.' 'Dang. I'm sorry for your condition. I really don't need the firewood though as I cut so much this year.. How can we negotiate? I'd hate for something to happen to you.' 'We can try to figure out a way to split the water and food in the fairest way ๐. Firewood isn't an issue so it doesn't matter as much. I think to start something like splitting the food 2/1 and the water 1/2?'
Utterance: 'That might work. I can always boil it and I could use the extra food for the kids.'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-db1ff378913b456ba1b9297b6b28b50c |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'What about the food? How much food do you need for camping?' '2 food would be all that I need ๐' 'I would need 2 food if you keep all the firewood. It would make it easier on me cooking wise since I'll have to look for wood'
Utterance: 'OK, that is fair. So I would get 3 firewood, 1 water and 1 food and you would get 0 firewood, 2 food and 2 water.'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-4accb1e2de9a4f2193513d4781e862d7 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I would like 2' 'I will be happy to let you have 3 packs of food , but I need 2 packs of firewood' 'I am also letting you have all 3 packs of water. I think we need to consider how to split the firewood in a fair manner.'
Utterance: 'What do you think is a fair deal with the firewood'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-7a406c986f124d14b36abd7a572bef19 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I can understand that. I know I really need the food the most. I'm already worried I'm going to run out. I also have blood sugar problems, so I cannot run out โน๏ธ' 'Thats fine. If you want you can have 2 foods and I get 2 of the fire wood. Sounds fair?' 'And I would take 3 water? '
Utterance: 'That would be a problem since I need the water too. I was hoping that since you got 2 foods ill get the 2 waters'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-1a3734a9c0d2454fa2e897248e68b967 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Ok, but I need at least 1 package of water. So, I can give you 2 packages of water along with the 1 package of firewood and the 3 packages of food. Do we have a deal?๐' 'So i get 1 firewood, 2 water and 3 food?' 'Yes, do we have a deal?'
Utterance: 'Yeah, we have a deal. Thank you '
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-7d8edd42a4644fdb8e7ab5769022745b |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'We need a moderate amount of everything and I think we can work something out successfully.' 'got it, OK I'll start then. I'd like at least 2 firewood' 'Okay. we brought some of our own food so I don't need much of that either.'
Utterance: 'do you want more water then? perhaps 2?'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-3b08f86ff91446b196738da1ba06c71b |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I do have a little hike planned, so the water comes in handy. I am more excited to relax and fish' 'Well I want to go run the trail, but like to check it out first. Perhaps we could walk one together. perhaps in a couple moments we could fix the supply situation .' 'Yeah, that would be fun. '
Utterance: 'Well, why dont you propose how to divvy up the packages and we can get on with out camping?'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-bfa78e025a174f1ab174b9e39de02887 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi there! How are you?' 'Hello good morning I'm well thank you.' 'Let's talk about what we need. First, I don't eat meat, so I really feel like I'd need a little extra food, as I couldn't hunt or forage for food at all. I feel like I could survive without a ton of water, but would need water, as I hike a lot and cant trust any sources'
Utterance: 'I've also planned my trip to include a lot of hiking and so I have a high priority for extra water, as like you've said you need to stay hydrated on your hike and you can't trust any source. How can we divide up the water as that seems to be the number one priority for us both.'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-79a7ba30d1ed4fe89a685c89248a2e4f |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context:
Utterance: 'I'd like to have 2 extra packages of water and firewood.'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-8db10baefe9d47bc8a4362a3852a5623 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'You would get 2 water and 2 food, I would get 1 water and 1 food for hiking and 3 firewood for having to stay out longer in the dark to complete my hiking goals.' 'doesn't really seem fair for you to get all the firewood. I would like to have at least one because then we're completely in the dark.' 'You get lots of water and food for your children, I am cutting back on my goals by giving up energy which means I have spend more time outside hiking. I do need to stay warm'
Utterance: 'yes which is why you have two firewood. I think it is fair for me to get at least one. If food is so important to you then I'll give you two food. but we would be in the dark'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-987ba00607d244d2a888dc5d045b2c04 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'You can have most of the water and firewood if I can have most of the food. I would like to get two of the firewood so I have a nice fire to come back to after searching for a source of water.' 'How about I take all off the water, 1 firewood and 1 food package? ๐' 'You can have all of the water if I can have all of the food. I promise that I will bring you back food. I am really good at foraging and I know all about what is edible in a forest ๐ I want to have two packages of firewood so that I can have a roaring and hot fire going when I come back from being out all day. I am sure that I will find some fish to catch at my water source! ๐ I'll bring some to back to share with you!'
Utterance: 'Thank you, I would appreciate that and it is very generous of you, Im not a strong hunter or fisher at all :) '
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-ce99696e43174ee5a9dcba957f0a55dc |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'n' 'Hello there I was just thinking of the upcoming camping trip.' 'I'm sorry about that, accidentally hit that send button lol! I was thinking about it as well. I'm pretty excited. How about you?'
Utterance: 'I was just thinking about the logistics and how to prioritize the various items.'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-2e93ae85fec14904a4233899ecb7028f |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi! Which items are important to you?' 'Food is the most important to me because I need to eat more often so that I can take my medications. ' 'Yeah, that is important. I do not have a problem letting you have more food than me.'
Utterance: 'Would it be possible to get an extra water also? How do you feel about the firewood? I wish we could split everything evenly.๐'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-fb1bd2d5aaab4c90b276f55826f0c5e9 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'yes, what would you like?' 'I was thinking I will take all the food and water. You can have the firewood. ' 'that's not going to work for me. I need to keep at least 2 foods and 1 firewood but you can have all the water.'
Utterance: 'Are you most interested in the food? ๐ฎ'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-9c0c3289a5fe40c38c5678171c1f53f9 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context:
Utterance: 'Hi there! Are you excited about camping?'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-b39584f85cc7416295495a71b48449fe |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello, I would like to take all of the firewood and two of the water packages. You can take all of the food and the other water package. '
Utterance: 'I am not a fan of that deal'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-426ce127e21a42cda2e418dc16c44844 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello, I'd like to get all of the water, an extra firewood and 2 of the food'
Utterance: 'Hi there. That hardly leaves me with anything and doesn't really work for me. I was hoping to make a campsite feast and get the extra food. If we can do that, I'd be happy to give you all the water and that extra firewood.'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-7cf8a80d998d40b0966035351b91c810 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you?' 'I am fine. How is your camping trip going?' 'I'm just finishing the final details of packing. I'm a little concerned I don't have enough of a few things. It is supposed to be over 100 degrees where we are going, and I don't think I have enough water. I'm concerned my kids are going to get dehydrated. I really could use 3 extra packages. '
Utterance: 'That will not be possible i am afraid. I need at least 2 packages of water too. I have some tabs that i have to take with water regularly.'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-39c9da29afc5478694135f0a1ecc611b |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hey! I hope you're having a good week and staying well. So we are negotiating on supplies! ๐' 'Yes. Hoping we can make a good deal.'
Utterance: 'Me too! I'm hoping for two food items and one water. I'm diabetic so if my blood sugar drops, I may need the extra carbs. And water because water is important! ๐ '
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-8c556479b4a74f94b86930c7c405c245 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi how are you?' 'I am good. How are You. I was just thinking about how I need extra water due to a medical condition. How about I take all 3 waters?' 'I am okay. How about I give you one and half then I get some firewood from you?'
Utterance: 'No I need at least 2 waters. But I am willing to give you all 3 foods, if I get all the firewood. Does that work for you?'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-d078c652d67445b9a7da91760eda4647 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Mine too! Camping is one of my favorite things to do with my family.' 'It should be a good weekedn for it. Unfortuately the air;ine loss our luggage with the sleeping bags and food. Not a good start for us with my mother-in-law along for the first time. My wife and her is down getting trail maps while I sort out keeping warm tonight and feed after some hiking.' 'Oh no! That sounds like a problem. I have four kids so I can relate about the concerns for staying warm and having enough food.'
Utterance: 'I see they have some supplies here to share between the camp sites. Maybe we can divide up the supplies so it works for both of us. I can really use 2 wood and 2 food. What about yourself?๐'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-3883266068874dad9b41ab58c5d719e3 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.' 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.' 'And I think it's entirely reasonable for you to have all 3 of the water as dehydration can be very bad very quickly, especially with diabetes.'
Utterance: 'That sounds like a fair deal. Food wise, how would you like to split that up?'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-521b26d6030b4abf906f2e43b6d13301 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context:
Utterance: 'Hello!'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-bf18c4fd24fd4a769d66b1244e94eaee |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hey there - looks like we are both going camping! I'm from the South so firewood and water are a high priority for me.' 'Wow, thats awesome! Yes, I am! Well, that's great because water isn't super important for me. Firewood is though. '
Utterance: 'That sounds awesome - I'm sure we can come to an agreement on how to allocate that works for both of us. '
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-50f294424de749feb991a6f64ea92faa |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi; I thought I was getting 2 firewoods, 2 waters and one food. Is that what we agreed upon?' 'You said you would give me 2 waters and 1 food for your 2 firewoods ' 'Yes, does that work for you. I could give you 1 water and 2 foods as I really need the water for my hike. I tend to overheat easily. '
Utterance: 'You are flipping it around. I can't give you 2 water and 2 firewood as that wouldn't really be fair '
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-2f3b3894df434f5c9d9964e72759d889 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hey, I was thinking that I could take all of the food items, and 2 of the firewood items. My friend has low blood sugar and they need the food in case they crash, and the warmth of the fire to maintain at evening.' 'Water is my highest priority, what is yours? Is it food?'
Utterance: 'Yes, food is my highest. It's necessary for my friend to keep extra around just in case he crashes. Why is water your highest priority?'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-3d7089adc2444b8b97f8a501548a3612 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'That will not work for me at all. ' 'I see. Then how does 2 Firewood, 1 food and 1 water for me sound? You'll be getting 1, Wood 2 Foods and 1 Water' 'Your calculations are incorrect. There are 3 firewood, 3 food, and 3 water. You are missing a water. I will return to my original offer since you need firewood the most and I need food the most. I take all the food, you take all the wood. And then you can take 1 water as you just suggested. '
Utterance: 'That will work fine with me. Please enjoy your food and two waters.'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-8525b0ac8163430f897ed76f0394a053 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'what else is a priority for you?' 'Firewood is definitely important as well! Last time I went camping we ran out pretty fast, so I want to be extra prepared. ๐' 'Oh no! I can see why that would be extra important to you! I will give you two of the firewood for two of the water'
Utterance: 'That sounds good to me! I think since water is pretty important on a camping trip (especially with a baby!), and since you are getting 2 extra packages of water, may I ask that I get 2 of the food packages? I have 2 (always hungry) preschoolers joining us haha! ๐ I can never seem to keep them full'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task359-88164b5a9aa447dba0a82f4984cebb15 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Oh yes, I have my whole family coming. I'm really excited because we don't see each other often. My aunts, uncles, cousins. Some of us will hike while others stay back. Maybe we can come to an agreement? Will you also be hiking?' 'Yes hiking for sure. If I take 2 firewoods and give you 2 waters and 1 food, would that be acceptable?' 'I think that could work '
Utterance: 'Thank you. Have a great time and stay safe. It's going to be a blast for sure. '
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-b1148484c14a4103ae2252b02f2243f6 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok๐'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait ๐ Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that ๐' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello! How are you today?'
Utterance: 'Good how are you'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task359-68d95ff63eb04bffadd22287ae9fb1b5 |
End of preview. Expand
in Dataset Viewer.
Dataset Card for Natural Instructions (https://github.com/allenai/natural-instructions) Task: task359_casino_classification_negotiation_vouch_fair
Additional Information
Citation Information
The following paper introduces the corpus in detail. If you use the corpus in published work, please cite it:
@misc{wang2022supernaturalinstructionsgeneralizationdeclarativeinstructions,
title={Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Tasks},
author={Yizhong Wang and Swaroop Mishra and Pegah Alipoormolabashi and Yeganeh Kordi and Amirreza Mirzaei and Anjana Arunkumar and Arjun Ashok and Arut Selvan Dhanasekaran and Atharva Naik and David Stap and Eshaan Pathak and Giannis Karamanolakis and Haizhi Gary Lai and Ishan Purohit and Ishani Mondal and Jacob Anderson and Kirby Kuznia and Krima Doshi and Maitreya Patel and Kuntal Kumar Pal and Mehrad Moradshahi and Mihir Parmar and Mirali Purohit and Neeraj Varshney and Phani Rohitha Kaza and Pulkit Verma and Ravsehaj Singh Puri and Rushang Karia and Shailaja Keyur Sampat and Savan Doshi and Siddhartha Mishra and Sujan Reddy and Sumanta Patro and Tanay Dixit and Xudong Shen and Chitta Baral and Yejin Choi and Noah A. Smith and Hannaneh Hajishirzi and Daniel Khashabi},
year={2022},
eprint={2204.07705},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.07705},
}
More details can also be found in the following paper:
@misc{brรผelgabrielsson2024compressserveservingthousands,
title={Compress then Serve: Serving Thousands of LoRA Adapters with Little Overhead},
author={Rickard Brรผel-Gabrielsson and Jiacheng Zhu and Onkar Bhardwaj and Leshem Choshen and Kristjan Greenewald and Mikhail Yurochkin and Justin Solomon},
year={2024},
eprint={2407.00066},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.DC},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.00066},
}
Contact Information
For any comments or questions, please email Rickard Brรผel Gabrielsson
- Downloads last month
- 49