input
stringlengths 2.45k
4.59k
| output
sequencelengths 1
1
| id
stringlengths 40
40
|
|---|---|---|
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello, I'm going camping today and I can't wait!' 'Nice, so are we!'
Utterance: 'That is awesome! The one bad thing about my campsite is there's no stream or lake nearby. I'm going to need a lot of it so I can shower/wash up'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-3a23aaab632e44f8baa4f9ed8c37b5d8 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I understand. I guess we are in the same predicament. I have two kids with me though and they are hungry too. How long are you camping for? We are here a week.' 'I let my two girls bring their friend. Its their first overnight trip for more than a night. We also had a week planned.' 'My kids really eat a lot. But then yours probably to as well!'
Utterance: 'Can we agree on 2 food for me and 1 water and firewood'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-6e0246cf91364a65b3740feda4058e7f |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'hi'
Utterance: 'Hi how is it going?'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-94a0a5d59835459c9abbd81910590987 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context:
Utterance: 'Hi there! Are you excited about camping?'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-392db080f8ff4ec3a3b47d62e373d373 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'That is fantastic. ' 'I'm glad negotiating feels smooth and clear' 'I know and out of all the other turkers I have negotiated with, you are by far the fastest.'
Utterance: 'Great, I'm going to input our agreed amounts.'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-de558f3b97c84f07afd8a935c86aefac |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Sounds like a rough camping trip. It has been pretty cold lately.' 'Is it possible I could have 3 food since I have none and 2 Firewood to stay warm and you can have 1 Firewood and 3 Water?' 'I do still need a little bit of food to get through the rest of the trip. What if you took 2 food and 2 firewood?'
Utterance: 'If I only had 2 Food and 2 Firewood, I would need 1 Water to wash the food down and put out the Fire when needed'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-13d4f1cbae514151b273ebf45df9bdad |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I'm more than willing to help you to the best of my ability. I understand and appreciate the difficult situation you find yourself in. How many packages of food and water do you think you will need for your additional guests? How much wood do you need since you are saying you don't need much?' 'Thanks for your understanding well I think if possible then to meet the situation then how bout 3 food and 2 water then you get all the wood ? That way you can have awesome campfires lasting through the night, we will be going to sleep extra early to wake up very early so we do not need all that wood, as much as we need food to replenish our energy and be ready for another day of long walks to see as much as we can from nature 🙂' 'I agree with you that campfires are awesome and I do find them to be be quite useful. I'm not as early of a riser as you are unfortunately! 🙂 I'm willing to accept your offer on food as long as you could please consider my needs for water. I am a very active hiker. While I don't need much food for my hikes I do require a lot of water. I once went on a hiking trip when I was new to the activity and ran out of water. I got lost and almost dehydrated! Ever since then it's been very important to me to have as much water as possible. What would it take in order for me to get as much water as possible keeping in mind that I'm willing to give you 3 food. '
Utterance: 'Thank you for the food and I understand we do have to think about water being by far the most important thing in life since it bascially is right 🙂 and well how about then we go do two waters for you and one wood then so then we can have that wood for just in case and we can all be happy ?? thanks for your understanding'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-5b3ee44222d342bfab5c58f6bbb406a2 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi how are you doing today?' 'I'm doing well. I'm very excited about our camping trip!'
Utterance: 'I am too! I have a rather large family and we are looking forward to getting out for some time away!'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-f930cf93253f4adc8c12b14449d1a6b5 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I was thinking firewood, because the most fun I have camping is roasting marshmellows and hanging out around there. How about you?' 'Oh hmm. I really need extra firewood because I forgot to bring a sleeping bag. I will be freezing to death at night. ☹️' 'Okay, well tell me what you need the least of, if you don't mind.'
Utterance: 'You can have all of the water if you let me have all of the firewood.'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-38bcee30b6344f30b64954cbe31b3656 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello, how are you? Looking forward to camping?' 'Oh yeah, that's for sure. What camping item do you prioritize?' 'I'm going to need some extra wood because I'm somewhat injured and can't really gather more.'
Utterance: 'Oh, I see. Well, I personally need lots of water to stay hydrated since I drank a lot already.'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-e63f0bcdf4794223bac0c43e1724cf1d |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. ' 'What type of place are you thinking of going camping to? Like what is the climate/area? More desert or forest, etc?' 'Forest, for sure. Deserts have scorpions and tarantulas and I'm scared of those.'
Utterance: 'Amen! Me too! 🙂 I too was thinking of going to the forest. Is your forest going to be wet or pretty dry?'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-63b7f7539f8e4db4aab7247845e31bb9 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hey, how are you?'
Utterance: 'Hello, i'm good.'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-ca79e119dd5f40ee8d4c3bcf79e20b07 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello there?'
Utterance: 'Hi! How are you?'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-7f9f319a02114cc7814cd10466202e01 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I'm sorry to hear about that -- I've been needing water because my child is with me and I can't let them get dehydrated since they're so young. Could we split the other items?' 'We mite can do that. What do you need more of?' 'do you want extra firewood if I take extra water?'
Utterance: 'At the least, Do you think I could get a little extra food if I give you some extra water as well?'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-5d04a8fbedf1421fb1457a64e11c5fc6 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I kinda need some firewood too. I'm totally good with the water, tho. How about I give you 1 firewoods, and give you three waters?' 'That sounds good but I need two foods please.' 'Hmm. :( How about I get 2 food and you get 1? That way it'll be slightly more equal'
Utterance: 'Since you are getting two firewoods I need two foods Let's deal on this.'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-3f33370be45e4ded9e67e38a9add0a6e |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'That works well, as long as I can have 2 food, I'll certainly give you 2 water, and I will have one water and you'll have one extra food' 'I would be most happy to make a concession on the food for an extra ration of water. Are you going to require any firewood if you don't need any I think i'll take the 3 rations so I can have a nice bonfire.' 'I do believe I would need at least one firewood, but am willing to give up 2, so you can have a nice big bonfire 🙂'
Utterance: 'You have been most thoughtful during this negotiation I just want to say thank you for being so helpful.🙂'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-1d33f40773e440978e76a1b8aa381f14 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context:
Utterance: 'Hey, Nice getting to interact with you. I would need additional packages of food as I'm camping with Family and my kids tend to get hungry often.'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-49094e9ff3a346c8ba79ded86635ad4c |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Well for a compromise I will give you the 2 packages of firewood, if I got 1 firewood, 2 food, and 3 waters. 🙂' 'Great, that sounds fair to me. ' 'Okay! Great! Nice chatting with you! 🙂'
Utterance: 'Sure, have a nice trip!'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-e8318424130d4d47b9b4f8ec09803c6e |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'My kids need the food. If you allow me to have two food I'll give you all the firewood' 'okay then I'll choose 1 food 3 firewood, and 2 water' 'It's a bit skewed towards you with all those items isn't it? If you want two waters then I'll need 3 food and one water. You can have all 3 firewood'
Utterance: 'Okay then I'll choose 0 food 3 firewood, and 2 water. you choose 3 food, 0 firewood and 1 water'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-811319e27af044e99643eff483793e71 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Good morning! Are you excited to go camping this weekend?' 'Yes, how about you! We are headed to Joshua Tree NP to do some rock climbing and hiking. ' 'Ooh rock climbing! I'm definitely scared of heights, so that's out for me. I'm heading to the Puget Sound to camp near the ocean.'
Utterance: 'My wife is from the puget sound. Was just up there a month ago. I am looking to take the food and water. We have a large group and will be active. We will have some hot and dry conditions in the desert. Some are high school age students with big appetites. What are your preferences.'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-fa66e5b0f5b947d985654aa71712ce3f |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Sorry to bother you, I don't need anything other than food package. So better you could give me 2 food package and take 3 water and fire wood. Please consider this deal.' 'No i absolutely need 2 food packages. So if you cannot agree to take 1 food 2 water and 2 firewood i will walk away. If you have children with you would would also need water which you are not asking for. ' 'Yes I too have children so only I am considering 2 food package, 1 water is enough for me and I dont need any firewood. So please accept this deal'
Utterance: '😡 I am walking away if i cannot get 2 food packages 1 water and 1 firewood. That leaves you with 1 food 2 waters and 2 firewoods. This is a good deal for you concidering that you havent been asking for water for your children until i mentioned that you need water for you children. Do you agree??'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-217e7158192b4609b0ed6616cea48c20 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'So 2 waters for me, 1 for you, and all the fire wood. How about the food? Perhaps 1 for me and 2 for you? Sound reasonable?' 'That sounds good to me!' 'Ok, by the way are you here with family or friends? '
Utterance: 'With a few friends. It's my birthday soon and we decided to go camping!'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-78cdbf82dfce4492907ec2bf3102fcad |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'LOL - not a chance. You're going to have to give me more than that. I am more skilled and thus need firewood. How about this...I will take 3 firewood and 2 food. You can take all the water because you're so non-skilled in the wilderness. I am going to hunt for my food, but again I have a large family. I am not considering your request at all. We will need to come to a decision relatively soon.' 'I understand your preferences. If I take all of the water, 1 firewood, and 2 food your family will still have the opportunity to have a good camping trip and I can learn to survive on this trip. Please consider my request again.☹️' 'Ok - you're not being reasonable at all. If you're so incompetent at going camping, maybe you should stay home and I can take all the supplies. How's that for an excellent offer? All for me and 0 for you.'
Utterance: 'I think it would be good to come to a compromise. If I take all of the water and have the 2 foods, you can take all of the firewood as you originally proposed. Yet, I will have a tough time learning how to survive on a camping trip.😡'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-6d5220ab59d64ce8bf0f2b21a22eb15c |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'i have some spare cans but i am not too worried about it. its a low prioirty for me ' 'How about your water? Won't you be going through a lot of water where you are going?' 'i am good on that, i dont think i will be but its second on my to do list'
Utterance: 'Are you willing to take 1 firewood and 2 waters? I also don't need the food.'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-2c8a3bc3c8504e5099df872033b75313 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Same here. I'll go ahead and list some of what I need and you let me know if you will need the same as well. I need some extra water for our camping trip as well as some additional food. ' 'That sounds reasonable. I don't particularly need the food because I see that as more of a luxury but I could really use some more water. It's supposed to get really really hot on the weekend. 😮' 'I hear that. What do you think of if I take 3 of the food supplies and you can have two waters? '
Utterance: 'That sounds like a fair compromise. I can get food by hunting animals, old school style. That would give you 4 total items. In that case it's only fair if I take all 3 of the firewood. 4 for me and 4 for you sounds like a good deal to me. 🙂'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-e61c242ea71f42f09f602d59ab16749c |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context:
Utterance: 'Hello, how are you doing on this fine day?'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-3db1e267486c4206a5332101ce8be913 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'At the same from my side. We need foods because my child is hunger' 'We with our kids undergone fasting in the recent days, so we are hungry to the peak' 'What did you expect from me? Because same position is here also'
Utterance: 'I would like to share water with you as we already have it in some quantity'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-14a2dd8a4402422ead35a26c8b88dcc3 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi I have an extra guest that will be camping with me and was wondering if you had an extra food package that you could spare?'
Utterance: 'I don't have much food, but you can take one package and I can take two? '
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-a84caf2d42c5479b911e7a4c34938fd9 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'i suggest we put excess in charge of working on proposition because prevention of excess is not a good first step.' 'I don't know what you mean by "prevention of excess." Can you clarify?'
Utterance: 'what i mean by prevention of excess is that we should focus on getting excess and not to limit it regardless of what we already have because if we should offer some creative approaches by excess. we can both come to an agreement if you are interested.'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-86a84ea7a21c41d19b17e63c73ddb9f2 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing?' 'I'm well! Excited for this camping trip.'
Utterance: 'Same! I'm a little worried about some of my supplies though. What about you?'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-a4ccc3e0764a44febffb39620e9e4b7e |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'sure that works' 'Okay, so I give you technically one firewood, two waters, and a food, right?' 'Hold on, i thought the two waters was in addition to my one i asked for previously. So i would take 1 firewood, 1 food, and 3 waters. '
Utterance: '>-< okay I just got confused. 1 firewood, 1 food, and 3 waters makes sense now that I reread it.'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-e2377f70351a4f05b94c9ae17a79d064 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I would be willing to do that if I could have two of the waters? I didn't bring as much as I thought I would need because I forgot I would have my dog. ' 'I can do that. So we're doing three firewood, one water and zero food for me and zero firewood, two water and three food for you?' 'That sounds great! I hope you have a great camping trip!🙂'
Utterance: 'Thanks. I hope you do too!🙂'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-2db5ffbeee434c0895019af443ffeb62 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Fine thank you. How about you?' 'I am great, i am really excited about camping how about you?' 'Same here! Its my family's first time out together and we are at the camping already.'
Utterance: 'Nice, are there any extra supplies that you will really need?'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-3eeb09b88ed14f5b9f9f048a796e84d8 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi there, and sincerely wish you can exchange some needed items with me.'
Utterance: 'Hello! I'm heading out on a camping trip myself, and also need some provisions. I will be enjoying the fresh air in a cold climate away from any bodies of water. Also, I will be working with a refugee camp while I'm there, providing solace and counsel to poor souls in need. So you see how critical it is that my trip is successful. I believe we can work out a deal though. I recommend that I have 3 water, 2 firewood and 2 food.'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-a23804085f85430dadb363d32230b7b1 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I'm packing for my camping adventure.' 'I am too. I am so looking forward to this. '
Utterance: 'Yes! I am so on the same page as you. I want to be sure I'm set and prepared. 🙂'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-ffdbbcfdc8ad45078a4decd6ae77e592 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'i need food the most since there will be my kids and I. I can give up my firewood for food' 'Okay, so how about I get 1 food, and 3 firewood and 1 water, and you get 2 food, 0 firewood, and 2 water' 'sounds great'
Utterance: 'great! sounds good to me'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-e3cf6e4436de43b4b9a9d58c00a86703 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'why can't i get 2 firewoods?.......i'm an ulcer patient i need more than enough food to keep fit'' 'It will be a strain, but I can give you 2 firewood if I get all the food and two water.' 'No that food is very much important to me......i'll get 2 food,2 firewood and 1 water'
Utterance: 'With little firewood, I need the food since I can't cook fish. How about you get 2 firewood, one food, and 1 water?'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-a40c2fd2dee1471e9520604971a08685 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I need the firewood and the food, you can have all the water.'
Utterance: 'no i need firewood to always keep myself warm.'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-d653276db900401ab125aefa1d3b574c |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'That is an interesting proposition. What about the water?' 'I think if you let me have 2 waters I might survive this scourge!' 'I think that your reasons are very compelling. I would also like to survive.'
Utterance: 'Oh, I want you too as well😮'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-cd089ee797544359a80708a786451966 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Howdy! Looking for firewood, water and food--really trying to get 3 packages of each, want to make sure my family has enough supplies for camping. I don't want anyone injured or our vacation cut short.' 'Ok. I am looking to have one package of water and on package of food.'
Utterance: 'Is there any way you could let us have 3 packages of each? I'm just trying to make sure my family has enough, we don't get to get out in the woods that often. It's really important to us.'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-b63351d536e84a5d989b46a6500f3037 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi there, good to connect with you. How are you today?'
Utterance: 'I am good, thank you. What are your preferences? I really need the extra food packages. We are doing a lot of hiking and mountain biking and there are no grocery stores for at least 50 miles.🙂'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-1a3c04ac4a26493bb13a221bc59b8a2c |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context:
Utterance: 'Hi! how are you doing? I hope you are getting things packed for the camping.'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-4c7c6bf22e5a4bea92d53289b9d20d72 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context:
Utterance: 'Hello! And happy camping! 🙂 To start off, I am thinking that I will need at least 3 firewood, 2 water and 1 food. Last time my axe broke and we ran out of wood! What do you think/need?'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-9c00aca306a24d0187950e889e0341a8 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'That could work, but I'm still a little worried I won't have enough food for 6 people. How long are you guys going to be camping for?' 'I will be camping for 3 day so I gotta have some food. Although, I do understand your situation.' 'I see. Yeah, if any of us knew how to fish or forage, we wouldn't need as much, but we're all from the city, so our survival skills are pretty bad and we're going to be camping for almost a week. But I get that fish aren't super reliable for food either... ☹️'
Utterance: 'I understand. So we have came to an agreement that I get 2 water, 1 firewood, and 1 food, is that right?'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-683485b0efd6436c8db6ad02f50e72fe |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?' 'I'll give you the 3 water, 1 firewood. How about I get 3 food and 2 firewood? I'll need the fire to cook my food.' 'I would need firewood to cook my food as well. I would like the 3 water, 1 food, and 1 firewood, what about that? '
Utterance: 'Since the value of water exceeds both food & firewood, I think it's fair for me to receive the extra dose of firewood. My offer to you is: you get 3 water, 1 food, 0 firewood. I would get 0 water, 2 food, 3 firewood.'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-bc8f5da040934c9c9f8b911c4d881092 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'can't do that, I would need 2 water, 2 food don't need firewood.' 'No one wants firewood! Guess no s’mores!' 'It's bad for the environment'
Utterance: 'How about I take 1 water, 2 food and 3 firewood'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-4f6d6f6b973d444490b1a5885f7037d6 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Okay that would be fine. If I can have 3 packages of firewood, you can have 2 packages of food. Does that work?' 'That does not work for me. I need at least one package of firewood. I'm sure you understand, because it seems like we have medical conditions with similar effects. You can take all of the water if I can get 2 packages of food and 1 of firewood. Does that work?' 'I do understand. That will work for me. '
Utterance: 'Could you tell me about why you want water? '
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-59a7b55ff05a40819119d72f4766cd52 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context:
Utterance: 'Hai friend.. my group going to a trip my team members are have some sick and i all have a kid so i need some more package. can you help me?'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-7721c8facab64f34b1b043dec8b0ea64 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hey, I am really excited! 🙂' 'Wow.. Cool ' 'Are you prepared for the camp?'
Utterance: 'Yes A little.. But I would need extra camping items '
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-c77ac055596a4bcea17b7d4c57ece4a5 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I'm not familiar with my surroundings. None of us going have ever been to this spot.' 'I mean I would give two waters if I could get one more food. So 2 water for you and 2 food.' 'I'd like to keep all the firewood if I'm giving the majority of the water.'
Utterance: 'Ok, that seems fair.'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-bf0a457c6e4b4fbea43681fd21151323 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'That would be fun! I feel like I always do better when I have someone to run against. Competition does me good. That sounds fantastic on the fire wood and water split. What is your food situation looking like??' 'How about this? 2 for you and 1 for me. Going low carb and mostly brought my own. What do you think? ' 'That sounds great! I don't think my chances for catching any fish are pretty slim!'
Utterance: 'You fish? Perhaps I could learn. Never got into it. '
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-bfa780f7d615413297b6f27ddd9f9dab |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context:
Utterance: 'Will you give me 2 packages of food and i give you 1 package of water?'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-30f56a46d4f643c59842c5e625597021 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'hello how are you'
Utterance: 'i'm good thank you, How are you doing today?'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-86d7d9db48954256a4f5547ff1338172 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi friend. 🙂 I'm going camping in the woods near my grandparents cabin. I'm inviting some friends along for a little bit of fun too because they have a guest house and a great field for tents. Would you like to come too? ' 'Oh that sounds awesome. I am actually going camping with my grandparents and my children. So I would love to have 2 firewoods for them. They get cold easily so I would like a little extra to make sure they can stay warm throughout the evening. 🙂' 'Yes, I would love to give you two firewoods! 🙂 My grandparents might check in on us, they like camping. But my grandpa has rheumatic problems so he needs lots of water. Could we take all three?'
Utterance: 'Thank you for the two firewoods. I totally understand that. Since we do have young children I want to make sure they stay hydrated so I would be willing to give you two if I can just have on extra for them.'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-44266427bbdb4672bf5d54fd27317dd2 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?' 'my item is food too.' 'Ok, other than food I could use some firewood. Maybe you could take 2 food and I could take 2 firewood?'
Utterance: 'sure, but i will get what then?'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-84afafeff1e149f7bb71160cd612af30 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'okay well I will take 2 foods and 2 firewoods then ' 'Thank you so much for understanding, I'm fine with that.' 'I guess that works out good because I need firewood to cook the extra food'
Utterance: 'I get it as you will be having additional packages of food, so I will have only 1 of each'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-755d9231169a440e9aeece114e13e399 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello! That sounds pretty reasonable to me. I was going out with a bunch of my buddies. We like to hike a lot in the sun, so we need lots of water. How does it sound if i take all the food and water, but you get all the firewood?' 'I love hiking. My daughter is bringing extra water. So we could trade the water for the firewood. We do need just a little food as I didn't plan on having an extra person.' 'Hmm, okay, that sounds reasonable. How does 3 water, 2 food and 1 firewood for me, and all the rest for you sound?'
Utterance: 'Im goign to need all the firewood I can get. They want to cook smores on it. How about you get 3 water 2 food and I get 3 firewood and 1 food. I think that is very fair and would help us both out. 🙂🙂'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-85db257d556b448db988b35530ad5f41 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello, how are you today?' 'I am doing good. How about yourself?' 'I am great, i am really excited about going camping, how about you?'
Utterance: 'Yeah, I want to make sure i am prepared. What do you think are the bests options?'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-594a358948214306bddd3f7466d8c1c7 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'hi how are you?'
Utterance: 'Im good thanks, and you? 🙂'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-d75b7307082c470da64f64016c0025ff |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I am doing good, how are you doing?' 'Doing well. My kids are looking forward to this camping trip. They've never done it before so they're looking forward to the experience!' 'Yes, camping trips can be quite fun. I am sure it will be a plesant experience for them.'
Utterance: 'Yah we have a few things planned. One of the things they are looking forward to is reading scary stories by the campfire and making s'mores'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-6cec4feb5b89462691a9e50b675239dd |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Doing great! How about yourself?' 'Pretty good, Monday's are always bit of a struggle though! ' 'Tell me about it! With this pandemic it seems like all days are Mondays 🙂'
Utterance: 'Too true! Anyways, what is the item that you prefer the most for this camping adventure? 🙂'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-f73b235fa6ee4fc3903983b115980342 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'So, it looks like we have reached a compromise. ' 'Yes we have. Just to clarify, I will get two packages of water and you will get one. I will also get two packages of firewood and you will get 1. And then I will get 1 package of firewood and you will get 2,' 'I will get two packages of food and you will receive one. I will get one jug of water and you will receive two. I will get one bundle of firewood and you will receive two.'
Utterance: 'Perfect. It has been a pleasure negotiating!'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-14eaad0ab7dc4ae99be6f6a5b068f2df |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello! how are you doing? are you excited to go camping'
Utterance: 'Yep! Been closed up too long with this Covid-19 stuff.😡Wish it would like the Prez sez "go away"'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-0e151c10dc474db6bfa01c7a427bfd6f |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello my friend! Are you ready to go camping?'
Utterance: 'Getting there, just need some more supplies to be safe.'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-5d0ed534ba5b47ee939a9d34b17e37b9 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello how are you?'
Utterance: 'Hey there fellow camper! I am great! How are you?'
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task357-df4878d2fa79487ba2281bb5fcc81405 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I completely understand, thank you for compromising with water and food. Wished we had 4 firewoods to divide and share it equaly, may I ask how long will you be camping for? Im afraid I need 2 firewoods as well, maybe we can see who has the greater need? ' 'I am going to be camping for a couple of weeks, so I will need quite a bit. I also realized some additional water would be good, because I have some meals that need me to boil water. Maybe you can have 2 firewood in exchange for me having one of your waters? Then you would still have plenty of water, but also plenty of firewood 🙂' 'So sorry, I just realized you did not agree to the 3 waters in exchange of 3 foods. if you want a water, i will also will need one food. just to make things more fair on my end. If not i am looking at 2 waters, 0 foods, and 1 firewood. But i am willing to compromise for 3 waters, 1 firewood, and 0 foods. and you'll get 3 foods, 2 firewoods, and 0 waters, what do you think?'
Utterance: ' I appreciate your willingness to discuss this, so we both get a fair deal. I would really like if I get 3 food, 1 water, and 1 firewood. Then you would get 2 water and 2 firewood. You said that you really need water and food, so I think that would work best for both of us to get what we need most. What do you think? 🙂'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-2b5b2671f1f24e99beb085c4c050b198 |
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find. It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello hope you are excited for the trip Im hoping we can discuss the supplies. I would like to get 2 water 1 food and 2 of the firewood ' 'I can give you 2 waters and 1 food, but I really need more firewood. I ran out last time and I don't want to go through that again! How about you take 2 waters, 1 food, and 1 firewood? '
Utterance: 'I feel like we are almost there I hunt so im ok with the one food; why would I only get one firewood?'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task357-1b2c4ecbad3f43748bc824046f295a3c |
End of preview. Expand
in Dataset Viewer.
Dataset Card for Natural Instructions (https://github.com/allenai/natural-instructions) Task: task357_casino_classification_negotiation_small_talk
Additional Information
Citation Information
The following paper introduces the corpus in detail. If you use the corpus in published work, please cite it:
@misc{wang2022supernaturalinstructionsgeneralizationdeclarativeinstructions,
title={Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Tasks},
author={Yizhong Wang and Swaroop Mishra and Pegah Alipoormolabashi and Yeganeh Kordi and Amirreza Mirzaei and Anjana Arunkumar and Arjun Ashok and Arut Selvan Dhanasekaran and Atharva Naik and David Stap and Eshaan Pathak and Giannis Karamanolakis and Haizhi Gary Lai and Ishan Purohit and Ishani Mondal and Jacob Anderson and Kirby Kuznia and Krima Doshi and Maitreya Patel and Kuntal Kumar Pal and Mehrad Moradshahi and Mihir Parmar and Mirali Purohit and Neeraj Varshney and Phani Rohitha Kaza and Pulkit Verma and Ravsehaj Singh Puri and Rushang Karia and Shailaja Keyur Sampat and Savan Doshi and Siddhartha Mishra and Sujan Reddy and Sumanta Patro and Tanay Dixit and Xudong Shen and Chitta Baral and Yejin Choi and Noah A. Smith and Hannaneh Hajishirzi and Daniel Khashabi},
year={2022},
eprint={2204.07705},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.07705},
}
More details can also be found in the following paper:
@misc{brüelgabrielsson2024compressserveservingthousands,
title={Compress then Serve: Serving Thousands of LoRA Adapters with Little Overhead},
author={Rickard Brüel-Gabrielsson and Jiacheng Zhu and Onkar Bhardwaj and Leshem Choshen and Kristjan Greenewald and Mikhail Yurochkin and Justin Solomon},
year={2024},
eprint={2407.00066},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.DC},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.00066},
}
Contact Information
For any comments or questions, please email Rickard Brüel Gabrielsson
- Downloads last month
- 113