input
stringlengths
999
1.21k
output
sequencelengths
1
1
id
stringlengths
40
40
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: I agree that the people who are killed are mostly innocent people and that those killed by the death penalty are almost certainly guilty of the crime. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-ee18d02eeebb4302a9a72d924d8d8574
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: The death penalty by nature requires a PERFECT body to govern it, we will never obtain that, we'll never come close. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-1b57826136744efb893b289d1cb6783a
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Well lets see - we have had about 70 executions in the last few years, people held on death row. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-edc38df609aa41d88a1d8ae2a3be277d
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: I firmly believe that some crimes and criminals are deserving of death. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-cc6be743495749a4968eb28cb556b6b7
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: If I ever "murder" someone without cause, I would deserve to die. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-bbb21437940346a38c6a7450a66f35f8
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: So, if you value the life of the foeutus the same as that of the mother, why is it ok to kill the foetus because of rape or incest? Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-bc33b9b0409e42e68b6471bbf083e388
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: The proper way to do it is to make sure that you are above the point where the noose is tied and then push the person. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-693d36eb02394413b0e8729e8c852d64
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: If we sentence someone to life in prison, we can always free them at a later time if they are found to be innocent. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-858c6b42633e403589e2cfb92f9c90d8
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: We can't have one without the other, in fact we can't have one without all of them. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-463ad731008748beb7eb321fff3cc579
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: 1-2 released per month since 1970s is not a FEW. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-a9b78658667e4adf928306f7685b6c4e
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: There are also people who will tell you that the death penalty actually kills innocent people. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-86a4d82fdcc84c3392928e5092b2eaca
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: And his family has my entire support if they call the death penalty themselves. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-24995becc8134375b87c09803de09a1e
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: The evidence i can bring to you is of cases that were recently discovered to have been errors. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-c857e2ec9a714e1cbad89d20190d4b7e
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: If you support the death penalty and concede that an innocent man could be put to death, you must be willing to put your name in the hat, with every one else, to have the government execute you by mistake. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-1755e9e6650c4bebb0ff4d3abbc77a7d
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: When a person does something horrible, we no longer see them as a human that values their life, we just see them as an epitome of hate. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-977984de4e9e4f04b688026f1ca2ef40
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: I'm talking about the reality of an accepted punishment, and you are bringing up a fictional torture system which is illegal and would have a snowballs chance in hell of gaining acceptance in the US. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-049aa09c91f94575887fef5271c2c9e2
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: DNA evidence can be evaluated thoroughly in a few days. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-19ff47fea93e4a919d0e582a02962feb
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: It is also possible for an innocent person to be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, but nobody is making the argument to stop sending people to prison. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-661592452f2645ff8b7e3de167b245ab
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: All you have to do is make it illegal to get an appeal and be done with it. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-7d8674421b4f4bbea896b25417d7ad8a
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: If they had agreed to him getting the death penalty, they wouldn't have to worry every two years about him possibly getting out. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-515fd515c9f34771af031ef10b525297
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Falling, at least thistown admits he doesn�۪t understand it all! Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-c08040cab57243e39614fdb945c1103c
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: I said that the definition and what I said are the same, because the one who is being rehabilitated is still being punished with suffering or pain and it is accomplishing the goal of them learning right from wrong. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-55840a9ebe7643ce91133f9958d87cb4
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: So check up on things a little more next time before you start throwing around blind accusations.�۝ Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-ff5e9a9bcb1d44ef9a6d39d6fe197327
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Is the victim going to come back that the criminal is dead? Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-03ddf37880a74223b63af8a450154620
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: the point we need to bear in mind is that sin implied death. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-09fd1cd3e4284ab48b359a0fdaf5d28b
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: What does this have to do with the death penalty? Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-2eb1cc7bec654f61ac910cebc0e99168
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: This alone is all you need to invalidate any argument in favor of the death penalty. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-a718685c1495403d86179cb4bdc3ddca
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: The non-repeat offenders are typically people who committed much smaller crimes that would never be worthy of the death penalty in the first place. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-cb8dc89721bb40ca93c1c0e00e11498e
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: so jesus, being both the ultimate animal sacrifice, and the sinless guilty criminal, solves the problem, but only for those who accept it and believe in it Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-87bf567ee25f4b4184736269e9245d6c
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Given the strong reasons for imposition of life without parole for certain cases, the risk of an innocent suffering that would have to be acceptable. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-7e839e1d4da64807a1e7b281e742a24e
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: If they know they'll die if caught, they'll likely kill more rape victims and children. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-030e4ea504fc4c25bad268dafded1e51
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Hellno is right, capital punishment should be much more cost effective than the alternative- life in prison without parole. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-3fb9e957af3e4d4c8c7d5b8b3624d9e2
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: the use of the death penalty is an act of revenge which cannot be undone, so should the state be put on trial for putting to death an innocent person? Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-1f3b9c27e9a440a0a230f60f8ff92d18
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: You can't limit appeals because people have been redeemed in their 3rd and 4th appeals. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-b08b085f408944c1a8715f50df6cef4a
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: There is absolutely ZERO evidence that the death penalty deters crime. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-4090d368a26c417cab5e7ee825b623e1
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: The death penalty is no more revnege than is any other sanction, meaning not at all. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-fe3f8d49cab04dd7826fbd416f939e65
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: For those who say "we need to make sure they don't kill again" no one in the history of maximum security prisons has ever escaped a maximum security prison, so it's not really an issue. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-b088e70da5574a02957792d37fea1d6d
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Think of the torment in the families minds,knowing that that killer is doing everything he can to get out.And that killer has help,he has the people that want to ban the death penalty!!!!! Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-5033230e92d54c769343467f686420d2
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: In the last three weeks we have had three police officers shot (two died). Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-79fe507b47994678b843561908dff9bd
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Unless some solid benifit can be shown for killing them, it is simply a childish act of revenge. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-69c8fda52393464a9c87d87804a7bde9
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: People in prison have done wrong and if we want our prisoners to be an asset to the country we must teach them right from wrong so they can be productive and positive. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-62452a5eefe74a7994be1436e22e53b5
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Once again, the false dichotomy fallacy raises its ugly head. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-0ebce92afe1f4f92bb3175ee55838817
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: 30 years of studies suggest that the death penalty is a general, or systemic, deterrent. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-d869a9de964d45f6925ab38b48ff382d
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: The death penalty should be bought back in ALL major cities as a punishment but the capital's highest courts should be the only court which gives the sentence. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-1cad20464552418ab3bd89c08e96ad2f
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Let's try to get an effective police, for instance. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-a098bc6d012c4ae0afa971daea56bcef
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: If one person was excecuted when he was innocent than thats hundreds too many. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-5c5a33db13f9459da5de55d4ead2b94b
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: I'd think murders going down after any execution would be mostly coincidental as most are 'heat of the moment' without consideration for penalty. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-f91e82584adc417fa66407a62686b81a
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: I guess you're referring to an american fundamental right. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-b324ee4ff7d54066bbbbdf7bb5640f07
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Videlicet, one cannot simply state that all homosexuals are nice people. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-35e6ef6def314ef79760288d516a1b3a
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: After all, absence of brain activity is considered legally dead in the medical field, so the start of brain activity should be the requirement for them to be legally alive. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-1430d4da643f41e6bcbabe5e8d38f41f
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: What I mean is, that NO punishment would be legitimate. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-20d7945102c74ea49b5617d762aa0a2a
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Most countries do not have the death penalty because they do not have these tools or mechanisms which makes them a less civilized society. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-273f34ff1e654111a228aefab0215284
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Saying the death penalty is a justified method of punishment for a crime just because the criminal is a killer himself is a completely contrived reason. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-1493ad8cb9794825bdb142099acba6fe
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: But to say that we shouldn't punish someone because of what the family would think is impractical. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-5e610db0a39f4d8daf7e9fec136d1cde
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: The temperatures are too cold that, if humans were to survive, they would most likely do so without a limb or two. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-beba30e66aad490fb123b7c90cb82340
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: I feel better putting them down, however, because an execution is a fitting response to the crime of murder. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-d25dbc66e50e43b49bebbecf3c387067
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Many states also have adopted Castle Laws which give the victim (that's the one that's not trying to commit a crime, Jo) the right to stand and fight vs fleeing and worrying about being shot in the back. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-110ed067d33b428ba672d6918b2f557e
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: The need to keep society safe from a criminal via encarceration balanced with the rights of the criminal against excessive punishment (ex. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-9815b62f185643c094c5a79de4ced090
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Funny the only times I've seen abortion and the death penalty referred to together when the right uses it to accuse the left of hypocracy. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-b9c95b24d8c24fdba9d8bac385b435bb
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: First, we must choose to use executions because they may save innocent life. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-c480878d44044b47b73cfe861c6dcd4f
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: The problem with the death penalty is eventually someone will be sentenced to death when they are in fact guilty. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-73bf7692fa2a4a4aa5ef272031a1dab6
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: The terms of his release from death row were in my mind so wrong, and without getting into too much detail I feel that the system did not work in this case. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-42f3c2576a9f4dedaff33c5b56c744b0
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: I have gotten about a dozen people to take my "try it before you shoot off your mouth" challenge, and every single one of them changed their tune by the end of their little adventure. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-f2c193659973411d962c7a9ade982bd7
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: God gave to government the legitimate authority to use capital punishment to restrain murder and to punish murderers. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-cb8bbe7d3a7f46f98a65cfefb7a307ea
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Texas' system of capital punishment is less than a quarter the cost of housing a criminal for life. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-884de26e5fc146b2ba946ca72ccb0559
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: then again, is it reasonable to pay the cost of feeding, clothing, and sheltering this person so as to prevent them from interfering with society? Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-d6d3cb7502344ea49f52b8191777a1ca
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: You have just shown your position why we should use the death penalty, but i have not seen the solution for people who are making crime? Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-07a4ef035c4d45e38a9824aa6ecda1c1
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Why should he get off so easy as to have what he did die with him in the short 10-15 years it would take to submit to the death penalty. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-31166e0bc0be40ddae41983e30470d07
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: People holding guns rarely kill by accident, but even when they didn't intend to kill but just do bad things to someone they don't like much, then they're in trouble for murder if the guy eventually dies. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-0737dddf097045daa252ff1e68f87a28
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: People use the argument that we should not execute people based on the possibility that they may be innocent, but they could care less if we lock someone up for life who may be innocent. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-19bdfdb5172749d78c519a6fbd2d05a6
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: what post-death christianity seems to misunderstand is that the death penalty is still in effect today. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-a9ee12998db74907ba90799dcca0c89a
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: You have conceded that a difference in neurophysiologic fitness makes sense, but we should decide on a case by case basis. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-9fc8b49ccfb546ed902d1ce93ea07978
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-97afcd72c455468998f80d976914b16d
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: If we kill a few innocent lifes in the process, thats fine by me as long as the rightfuly convicted felons are killed VIA leathal injection and/or electric chair. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-9c3bba3004ad44acabd91675dac5ec30
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: So if we can assume that innocent people are convicted in capital punishment cases, shouldn't we be free to assume that innocent people are being convicted in non-capital punishment cases as well? Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-9057fc5ced0b4d82ac0e7c1e5727e2da
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: The costs of imprisonment, as well as providing food, clothing, space and appropriate living materials is essential. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-bae07e9caee24aaca6db16115eea6900
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: some of the innocent people that have been executed in the Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-df95d5813e774b0d8460a913af3a0be9
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: If you say I'm X, and I say you're wrong, then you're wrong because I'm not X. I shouldn't have to explain that." Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-c04ceabd15f0458597c24ebd376b6289
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Places like IL, that have shown that they aren't, shouldn't be in the execution business, but if 10 people watch John Doe kill someone in cold blood, he's got to go, IMO. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-20283b44316d48d7abe897c96d76b211
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: ALSO HAVE MANY IN JAIL FOR THE REST OF THERE LIVES. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-533e2dd85dc64e2a9a6a90b4ed7d0a9c
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: And if the plan failed, has anyone dared to restart the execution? Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-5510bad19ba2469da9c37466059d4c3b
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: In order to argue that the death penalty should be used, you have to prove that there is a very good reason to limit the most fundamental of rights, the right to life. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-05dbe615489f43e7a5d3b8d29e8160d8
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: If you do, you are burdened with making the excuses for it. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-6940893b86084d8a9831d1a873cdd7e4
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: IMO the death penalty is about justice for the loved ones of the victims. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-1fc4780a58c141228e6cb0390c4c428e
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: As you said yourself, Humans are flawed, and so the designs of humanity are no more perfect than we are. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-f7b6948faf324229ac4f3b151cf6bdec
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-c30006f816f24fb292507b0446fc47c7
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Only some states use the death penalty, only some countries allow the death penalty. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-4e39d9b85bb14c54b0be1b2dbac348da
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: That could be considered Cruel and Unusual Punishment, it could mess with the persons mind. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-9ff31b6820094a6c9e6cca4753dbc5a9
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: if one cannot be rehabiliated in prison, they should be eliminated. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-548d778b29a346dbbd691b9ffd317dc3
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: If anything, this kind of "argument" is an argument for abolishing the death penalty, since it isn't used uniformly across the entire country. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-f27369eab8d54bc1b5d60768d40c249f
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Studies have actually shown that people regret having the kid much more than they do having an abortion. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-24cd71b11a7d40cd9ce375f3538ff639
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Some prisons are actually prisons instead of criminal resorts, and those are the best to put scum like them in. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-b2cd7e8e5aa7420cab32252965114a61
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: So you hurry home, and upon your arrival the police inform you that your daughter, the one who was raped, was found raped and murdered and we have the rapist/killer in custody. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-dbc9ac8ee730493fb8d9b439b6f3e280
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: You send somebody to the chair and a few years later evidence surfaces, and guess what you killed the wrong guy. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-a1952a4050a343f78cbcf8a01417dd55
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: If it is not, then we should not be putting people on trial for murder. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-c63636bf08d147f39893bd50002a588d
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: It was not at all a response to me, even indirectly, as Ooaman and I aren't even talking about the same things. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-d1dfc5296e6e484ea4971c36a7518f59
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: Perhaps when the anti-crowd overwhelmingly calls for total reform, I might lend a little credence to their argument. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-be1a82a0104b411eaefa8d856c7c77e2
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: If I die, I want to go out by firing squad. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-f1c2d6e6183841ceb9956e363cf9333d
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: One of the many grievances I have is that child rapists don't qualify for the death penalty unless the child that gets raped is also killed. Output:
[ "Valid" ]
task149-3ed622bd80c44e63bae8d9a01285edb9
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty. Positive Example 1 - Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos Output: Invalid Positive Example 2 - Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time Output: Valid Negative Example 1 - Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear. Output: Valid Now complete the following example - Input: I see I was right to highly doubt your ability to prove anything. Output:
[ "Invalid" ]
task149-b0d64a52f5b146d5bb8fc5cf1d37541f

Dataset Card for Natural Instructions (https://github.com/allenai/natural-instructions) Task: task149_afs_argument_quality_death_penalty

Additional Information

Citation Information

The following paper introduces the corpus in detail. If you use the corpus in published work, please cite it:

@misc{wang2022supernaturalinstructionsgeneralizationdeclarativeinstructions,
    title={Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Tasks}, 
    author={Yizhong Wang and Swaroop Mishra and Pegah Alipoormolabashi and Yeganeh Kordi and Amirreza Mirzaei and Anjana Arunkumar and Arjun Ashok and Arut Selvan Dhanasekaran and Atharva Naik and David Stap and Eshaan Pathak and Giannis Karamanolakis and Haizhi Gary Lai and Ishan Purohit and Ishani Mondal and Jacob Anderson and Kirby Kuznia and Krima Doshi and Maitreya Patel and Kuntal Kumar Pal and Mehrad Moradshahi and Mihir Parmar and Mirali Purohit and Neeraj Varshney and Phani Rohitha Kaza and Pulkit Verma and Ravsehaj Singh Puri and Rushang Karia and Shailaja Keyur Sampat and Savan Doshi and Siddhartha Mishra and Sujan Reddy and Sumanta Patro and Tanay Dixit and Xudong Shen and Chitta Baral and Yejin Choi and Noah A. Smith and Hannaneh Hajishirzi and Daniel Khashabi},
    year={2022},
    eprint={2204.07705},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    primaryClass={cs.CL},
    url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.07705}, 
}

More details can also be found in the following paper:

@misc{brüelgabrielsson2024compressserveservingthousands,
    title={Compress then Serve: Serving Thousands of LoRA Adapters with Little Overhead}, 
    author={Rickard Brüel-Gabrielsson and Jiacheng Zhu and Onkar Bhardwaj and Leshem Choshen and Kristjan Greenewald and Mikhail Yurochkin and Justin Solomon},
    year={2024},
    eprint={2407.00066},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    primaryClass={cs.DC},
    url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.00066}, 
}

Contact Information

For any comments or questions, please email Rickard Brüel Gabrielsson

Downloads last month
0
Edit dataset card