Datasets:

JaehyungKim

/

p2c_polite_wiki

like 0

Ah, thanks! Btw, IS THERE any kind of guideline for FAs in regard to lede length somewhere?

How exactly is it unclear? The ships link to the same place, the prefix "HMS" comes before ''Eagle'' to show her name change... what's not there that should be?

Why did you erase the <url> page? I was working on that article, and his notability is not disputed?

I'm sorry, but I don't see the edit if you're referring to the <url> article. Are you referring to something else?

Hey how are you? Now I can't find you online, where are you lol?

Thanks for the cleanup. Why did you delink the songs and Weird Al's album?

I made a change to your user page. Is that the change you wanted?

True. What do you think about the notability of this particular article?

Thanks. Does it happen to say anything about his marriage to Paula, as in when it ended?

If the only page you've been visiting is Wikipedia, then it makes sense the viruses would come from here, but if you've been to other sites, they get thrown into the equation. Again, don't you have any anti-virus software?

What do you mean by "not a derivative of Formula 3 article"? Why did you feel compelled to remove the link to the main F3 article off the top of all the F3 sub-articles?

Is there any point to the quotation that's not served equally by the link on its own? Other than the obvious (which I'd like to think you're above), which is trolling the student pollies?

Hi, ixb4d like to know why are you constantly removing all information i put in your scm comparison about Plastic SCM. donxb4t we have the right to show there our information as the rest of users?

Thank you, I was wondering what type of unit this was. Civil Defence, some kind of police squad, or perhaps even Freikorps?

Fatwa? What is that?

There's an interesting discussion here: <url>. Care to explain?

What part of "use common sense" did not get through to you? Was it the "use," the "common," the "sense," or some combination thereafter?

Thank you! Could you protect the picture that's live too?

pls see my comments on your revert on the talk page. Perhaps you'll consider undoing my revert?

Links to attack sites and so are not allowed. You must know that you violated BLP?

It does not appear to have attracted any participants other than Gerda. Perhaps adding a <person> template would draw in more participants?

Why did you revert my edits on that page? You say it was unsourced but it was sourced, I put two references to two fair sources (not blogs nor politicaly bound), so why did you remove them?

Back on topic Jigglyfidders; I totally agree with Deconstructhis on this one. What will you do to address this issue?

Hi again, OK, say we don't go along the lines of Blair will go before the end of 2007; but we list the announced candidates for when Blair does resign (which will inevitably happen at some point). Do you think this would be any better/more suitable?

As I've only ever tagged one page for speedy deletion before (and that was an obvious cut-and-paste copyvio), I just want to make sure I tagged it properly. Was db-1 the right tag for <url>?

I wasn't sure what you mean by making the title a clickable link. Can you show me how to do that?

Well, lyrics are generally frowned upon on Wikipedia, unless the song is old enough that its copyright no longer applies. Could you perhaps link to the article?

OK, I give up? What notability is asserted?

Sorry, I was wondering if the are related to each other or separate organizations? Also is there a difference between North Twillingate and Twillingate?

... then you have to at least meet me half-way. For instance, "''<url>'' described the episode as displaying "an exhilarating flair for rapid change of comic gear" and made commented positively on the scene." Can you see the problem here?

Hi, do you mind if I move your hook to go live on 26/27th? The GLAM WIKI conference could do with being highlighed by a non US/UK hook?

I think it's time we considered a perma-block on the IP in question. Comments?

How is it false to state he was the ruler of the PRC - terms such as "Mao's government" are used in the article. Can you leave your Marxist personal beliefs at the door?

No kidding. Perhaps you could be troubled to point out the parts you consider to be actionable as'spam'?

I don't really get it. In your terminology, is there someone practicing Germanic paganism who is not a neopagan?

I started working on missing translations of news titles inside citations, but discovered that square brackets leave an ugly residue, while round ones may not be optimal, since they clash visually with the "language" ones. Would it be acceptable to just use the English version as title?

According to ''Nature'' <url>, the picture is xa9 Zhongda Zhang/IVPP (IVPP is the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology in China). What evidence do you have that we have permission to use it?

Arguably, listing the former constructors and even the template itself is not necessary. Could we please try reinstating the previous version and see if and how many other folk don't find the decade information useful/intriguing?

You have reverted four times, Sarek three times, and an IP once. Do I take it that you are declining to undo your edit?

I don't know why claim that you reverted vandalism (rv edit summary) when to me they appeared to be good faith edits. What exactly was the vandalism?

Great. Any reason why SCIRS is still an essay and not a content guideline?

Hi, Thank you for closing <url> as "delete", but much of the material immediately re-appeared at <url> (see <url>) so the questionable content hasn't been deleted at all. Can we do something about this?

I often work out of Sweden and I have an excellent, free, built-in English or Swedish grammar ''and'' spelling program in ''Word'' on that computer using Firefox (as this user says she does) - red underlinings for spelling and green for grammar - which would preclude almost all of the huge amount of problems caused by this user regarding readability, or at least alert her to the very quanitity of the problems and inspire a constructive attitude as to her own capacity. Perhaps if one does not consider it a "duty" of sorts to contribute readable English here, that actually might be the problem?

I've had enough of this. What would you think about filing a RfC?

He used it to assert that '''''others''''' had expressed the notion that the process was concluded and that it was time to move on, and used your statement as evidence of this. Since you did not mean that it had been concluded, and since obviously you were only speaking for yourself and no one else, and participants have been continuing to post on the RfC page and its Talk Page to indicate that they do not feel this way at all, how does it serve to support the idea that they have?

Perhaps these articles should be nominated for deletion. A blue belt is far from a notable BJJ player; Google returns 594 results for him, many of which might not even be the Barry Ley in question; and as for the Blaggers article: I don't see any articles on the higher-selling books you mention, why does this one deserve it?

Afterthought: where did you get your figure of 82500 tons pa??

Have you visited <url>???

He's doing it again, removing Lauren's "bottom 2" placing (<url>). I just reverted him but maybe we need to file something at AN/I?

I don't see how you can use this to discount his trustworthiness and oppose him. If there is consensus to promote among several bureaucrats, what's it matter who actually presses the button?

Sure AGK. Does the draft need to be updated to include the tweaks?

Please don't mention other languages when we're discussing the English wikipedia! Why are you limiting yourself only to the Abrahamic concepts of ''God''?

Hmmm, you are basically asking me to think positively despite evidence and knowing that over this issue none good faith on part of some users was showed in past, but ok, letxb4s see how it goes. The question then is: do you consider including the discussions with outside mediation participants that happend on those talk-pages (direktor, for exemple, has been very active and enthusiastic there lately) or only the in-mediation discussions are the ones that count?

I really think that the text you have drafted at <url> is far fuller and better than the article as currently drafted. Do you have any objection to me deleting the current text (except for the infobox which I will retain) and importing you text in its entirety?

You are welcome. Do i correctly understand that you plan to use the <url> account as your primary account from now on?

Are you kidding me? Do you even bother to click on <url> to see its fleet?

Hello Roman! If you have time, could you add a <url> infobox (with census data) for <url>?

Done. Comments?

<person> - sorry about that, those situations are confusing. Maybe Twinkle uses, or behaves like, rollback?

I had to revert another one <url>. How about that protection?

Thanks for taking all that on....just wondering on the template if that Vancouver / North LM split vs Fraser Valley South LM split is something Elections BC cooked up; "North" and "South" just don't seem right geographically/compass-wise, it's more like "West" and East".....I'm imagine there's reason to your rhyme; dito Vancouver Island/South Coast which is a-geographical somewhat if North Island is included (the Queen Charlotte Strait region is part of the Central Coast). If those are divisions used by Elections BC I guess that's what it is, though....I can make some additions to various pages describing the changes relating to ridings they're made out of and waht areas are in/out in each case.....and since the districts were created in 2008, shouldn't hte title say that instead of 2009?

I read his note, and you should know that as I responded to it and then you responded to me. So where did the doubt come in regarding that matter?

OK, same situation here :-) Marskell and I agreed on a proposal that would initially just give us some backup on the day-to-day stuff, not necessarily closes, but to work in to people who could help when we needed time off. Is it OK with you if I go ahead and propose that to Raul?

Making edits vanish without a trace would be ''extremely'' difficult to do u2013 only full <url> could do that, and I can assure you the oversighters wouldn't do such a thing just to allow somebody to cover their tracks. Maybe you are mis-remembering something, about edits that were in fact on some other page?

No worries, thanks for doing that. Nice to hear from you again - new username for 2013?

If you have time could you look at <url><url> on the <url> article. I'm wondering what your thoughts are in terms whether it should go or stay?

All right, I'll bite. Is honorary membership in the Justice League not criteria enough for being listed in that category?

Could you be more specific. Are there specific points in the article that you believe are repetitive?

Hi there, I've raised the possibility of unprotecting the tamazepam page <url>. What are your thoughts?

ok that was really confusing, I clicked on this link <url> and then cleaned the page but the page still exists, sso from what I understood if you put the ending "/double redirect" at the end of any article, you'll see how many redirects it has? is that right?

That incident is already mentioned in the <url>. Why do you insist on redundantly adding it?

Hi, thanks for moving three of the Brussels municipalities. Could you move <url> to <url> as well?

Hi Hektor. Could you please provide a rationale tag for this image?

Your early edit's clearly indicate that you were not a newbie. How do explain this?

Mel, is the above comment from you? If not, could you please respond?

What was your aim with <url>? have you abandoned it?

Thanks very much indeed! :-) I don't suppose you'd fancy having a deadlink trawl over at <url>, would you?

I'm trying to keep Minority Report as a GA, and the <url> requested for copyediting - but didn't give examples to cleanup. Can you give me some input on what to rewrite?

Listen, the reason I put those signs in the code 'break-clear' is because the arrangement of the blocks is ''off-key'', at least when looking through IE or Mozilla. Why are you taking them off?

You have been accused of sockpuppetry at <url>. Scared?

you need a copy, you say... by that you mean a translation, or one which has been reconstructed to meet en. wiki coding?

Can I use a manga image colored by myself? There won't be any problems with the lisense, right?

Serouj, you didn't reply to my message and my email. One question: if the church was built after 1700 but later ruin, for instance ruined by Beria order in 30s, can it be considered Contemporary?

I have left a comment on the Talk page under that section. You haven't said much there - is there some place where you present your view with a little more detail?

I'm sure. How about we let the sockpuppet investigation let us know for certain, m'kay?

I believe supserstition exists. Why did you ask me?

Isn't this section "Vatican Responses"? How come the wordings are not fact-based but seem to have devolved into media perceptions of the Vatican responses?

You're unblocked. Do you want to discuss what the article should be named?

I thought we had already established consensus last month. What exactly is the deal with the parenthesis and columns?

Hi im currently compiling a college project on unreliable information and would like to view the deleted article Dudley O'Neill. Can you help?

Hey, look at this, I don't even know your name! Quel est votre nom, Mademoiselle?

Hi. Is there anything I can do to help you utilize the spell check features of your browser?

Doing too many things at once? Not listening?

The only way I have a naval website is that I am one of the people actively working to make sure Wikipedia has good coverage of naval topics here. Which website do you think I run?

Many thanks for the review. So what was the truce term ''you'' used when little then?

Hi there. On a tangential note, would you happen to be <person>?

As another aside, they are mostly Germans. What's up with that?

I was wondering if you'd like me to make your userboxes (on your userpage) line up horizontally (in columns of 3) rather than vertically. Interested?

I understand the problem with that redundant category--I've hashed that out, I think--but why did you remove ALL categories from the Christian shows? That seems....excessive... Or do I just need a nap?

Reply: I have just found your edits to the talk page of the above article - not impressive at all? I suggest that you take this to <url> and explain why his edits need to be reverted and not yours?