mradermacher/Llama-3-Instruct-Neurona-8b-v2-i1-GGUF
Updated
•
631
pattern_id
int64 1
11
| pattern
stringclasses 11
values | test_id
int64 0
4.08k
| negation_type
stringclasses 3
values | semantic_type
stringclasses 3
values | syntactic_scope
stringclasses 3
values | isDistractor
bool 2
classes | label
bool 2
classes | sentence
stringlengths 16
275
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | false | true | An introduction is commonly the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | true | false | An introduction is commonly the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | false | true | An introduction is the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | true | false | An introduction is the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | verbal | analytic | clausal | false | false | An introduction is not the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | verbal | analytic | clausal | true | true | An introduction is not the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | synthetic | subclausal | false | false | An introduction is never the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | synthetic | subclausal | true | true | An introduction is never the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | false | true | An introduction may commonly be the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | true | false | An introduction may commonly be the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | false | true | An introduction may be the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | true | false | An introduction may be the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | verbal | analytic | clausal | false | false | An introduction may not be the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | verbal | analytic | clausal | true | true | An introduction may not be the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | false | true | Introduction commonly stands for the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | true | false | Introduction commonly stands for the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | false | true | Introduction commonly refers to the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | true | false | Introduction commonly refers to the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | false | true | Introduction stands for the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | true | false | Introduction stands for the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | false | true | Introduction refers to the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | true | false | Introduction refers to the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | synthetic | subclausal | false | false | Introduction never stands for the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | synthetic | subclausal | true | true | Introduction never stands for the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | synthetic | subclausal | false | false | Introduction never refers to the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | synthetic | subclausal | true | true | Introduction never refers to the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | verbal | analytic | clausal | false | false | Introduction does not stand for the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | verbal | analytic | clausal | true | true | Introduction does not stand for the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | verbal | analytic | clausal | false | false | Introduction does not refer to the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | verbal | analytic | clausal | true | true | Introduction does not refer to the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | synthetic | subclausal | false | false | Introduction does never stand for the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | synthetic | subclausal | true | true | Introduction does never stand for the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | synthetic | subclausal | false | false | Introduction does never refer to the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | synthetic | subclausal | true | true | Introduction does never refer to the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | false | true | Introduction may commonly stand for the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | true | false | Introduction may commonly stand for the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | false | true | Introduction may commonly refer to the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | true | false | Introduction may commonly refer to the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | false | true | Introduction may stand for the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | true | false | Introduction may stand for the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | false | true | Introduction may refer to the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | true | false | Introduction may refer to the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | verbal | analytic | clausal | false | false | Introduction may not stand for the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | verbal | analytic | clausal | true | true | Introduction may not stand for the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | verbal | analytic | clausal | false | false | Introduction may not refer to the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | verbal | analytic | clausal | true | true | Introduction may not refer to the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | false | true | The first section of a communication is an appropriate definition of introduction in certain contexts. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | true | false | The largest possible quantity is an appropriate definition of introduction in certain contexts. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | false | true | The first section of a communication is an appropriate definition of introduction. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | true | false | The largest possible quantity is an appropriate definition of introduction. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | false | true | The first section of a communication may be an appropriate definition of introduction in certain contexts. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | true | false | The largest possible quantity may be an appropriate definition of introduction in certain contexts. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | false | true | The first section of a communication may be an appropriate definition of introduction. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | true | false | The largest possible quantity may be an appropriate definition of introduction. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | false | false | The first section of a communication is an appropriate definition of introduction in no context. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | true | true | The largest possible quantity is an appropriate definition of introduction in no context. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | false | false | The first section of a communication may be an appropriate definition of introduction in no context. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | true | true | The largest possible quantity may be an appropriate definition of introduction in no context. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | verbal | analytic | clausal | false | false | The first section of a communication is not an appropriate definition of introduction in any context. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | verbal | analytic | clausal | true | true | The largest possible quantity is not an appropriate definition of introduction in any context. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | verbal | analytic | clausal | false | false | The first section of a communication is not an appropriate definition of introduction. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | verbal | analytic | clausal | true | true | The largest possible quantity is not an appropriate definition of introduction. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | verbal | analytic | clausal | false | false | The first section of a communication may not be an appropriate definition of introduction in any context. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | verbal | analytic | clausal | true | true | The largest possible quantity may not be an appropriate definition of introduction in any context. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | verbal | analytic | clausal | false | false | The first section of a communication may not be an appropriate definition of introduction. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | verbal | analytic | clausal | true | true | The largest possible quantity may not be an appropriate definition of introduction. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | false | true | In certain contexts the first section of a communication is an appropriate definition of introduction. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | true | false | In certain contexts the largest possible quantity is an appropriate definition of introduction. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | false | true | In certain contexts the first section of a communication may be an appropriate definition of introduction. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | affirmation | none | none | true | false | In certain contexts the largest possible quantity may be an appropriate definition of introduction. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | false | false | In no context the first section of a communication is an appropriate definition of introduction. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | true | true | In no context the largest possible quantity is an appropriate definition of introduction. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | false | false | In no context the first section of a communication may be an appropriate definition of introduction. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | true | true | In no context the largest possible quantity may be an appropriate definition of introduction. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | synthetic | subclausal | false | false | The first section of a communication is never an appropriate definition of introduction in any context. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | synthetic | subclausal | true | true | The largest possible quantity is never an appropriate definition of introduction in any context. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | synthetic | subclausal | false | false | The first section of a communication is never an appropriate definition of introduction. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | synthetic | subclausal | true | true | The largest possible quantity is never an appropriate definition of introduction. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | false | false | Not a single introduction is commonly the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | true | true | Not a single introduction is commonly the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | false | false | Not a single introduction is the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | true | true | Not a single introduction is the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | false | false | Not a single introduction may commonly be the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | true | true | Not a single introduction may commonly be the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | false | false | Not a single introduction may be the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | true | true | Not a single introduction may be the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | false | false | No introduction is commonly the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | true | true | No introduction is commonly the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | false | false | No introduction is the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | true | true | No introduction is the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | false | false | No introduction may commonly be the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | true | true | No introduction may commonly be the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | false | false | No introduction may be the first section of a communication. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 0 | non_verbal | analytic | subclausal | true | true | No introduction may be the largest possible quantity. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 1 | affirmation | none | none | false | true | A current is commonly a flow of electricity through a conductor. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 1 | affirmation | none | none | true | false | A current is commonly any customary observance or practice. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 1 | affirmation | none | none | false | true | A current is a flow of electricity through a conductor. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 1 | affirmation | none | none | true | false | A current is any customary observance or practice. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 1 | verbal | analytic | clausal | false | false | A current is not a flow of electricity through a conductor. |
1 | Synonymy1 | 1 | verbal | analytic | clausal | true | true | A current is not any customary observance or practice. |
We introduce a large semi-automatically generated dataset of ~400,000 descriptive sentences about commonsense knowledge that can be true or false in which negation is present in about 2/3 of the corpus in different forms that we use to evaluate LLMs.
If you want to run experiments with this dataset, please, use the Official Scorer to ensure reproducibility and fairness.
@inproceedings{garcia-ferrero-etal-2023-dataset,
title = "This is not a Dataset: A Large Negation Benchmark to Challenge Large Language Models",
author = "Garc{\'\i}a-Ferrero, Iker and
Altuna, Bego{\~n}a and
Alvez, Javier and
Gonzalez-Dios, Itziar and
Rigau, German",
editor = "Bouamor, Houda and
Pino, Juan and
Bali, Kalika",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
month = dec,
year = "2023",
address = "Singapore",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2023.emnlp-main.531",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.531",
pages = "8596--8615",
abstract = "Although large language models (LLMs) have apparently acquired a certain level of grammatical knowledge and the ability to make generalizations, they fail to interpret negation, a crucial step in Natural Language Processing. We try to clarify the reasons for the sub-optimal performance of LLMs understanding negation. We introduce a large semi-automatically generated dataset of circa 400,000 descriptive sentences about commonsense knowledge that can be true or false in which negation is present in about 2/3 of the corpus in different forms. We have used our dataset with the largest available open LLMs in a zero-shot approach to grasp their generalization and inference capability and we have also fine-tuned some of the models to assess whether the understanding of negation can be trained. Our findings show that, while LLMs are proficient at classifying affirmative sentences, they struggle with negative sentences and lack a deep understanding of negation, often relying on superficial cues. Although fine-tuning the models on negative sentences improves their performance, the lack of generalization in handling negation is persistent, highlighting the ongoing challenges of LLMs regarding negation understanding and generalization. The dataset and code are publicly available.",
}