body_cleaned
stringlengths
28
4.28k
id
stringlengths
4
7
subreddit
stringclasses
3 values
year
int64
2.01k
2.02k
annotation1
stringlengths
28
4.33k
annotation2
stringlengths
28
4.34k
gold_annotation
stringlengths
28
4.34k
bio_annotation
sequencelengths
6
841
ids
sequencelengths
6
841
tokenized_body_cleaned
sequencelengths
6
841
these stats are so bogus , and tax policy does not change this . most of the mega rich hide their finances . communism and socialism have higher gaps because great wealth is stolen and not tracked . a pure free market will produce equal income just as pure communism is supposed to .
c05zapk
Economics
2,008
these stats are so bogus , and tax policy does not change this . most of @@the mega rich## hide their finances . communism and socialism have higher gaps because great wealth is stolen and not tracked . a pure free market will produce equal income just as pure communism is supposed to .
these stats are so bogus , and tax policy does not change this . most of @@the mega rich## hide their finances . communism and socialism have higher gaps because great wealth is stolen and not tracked . a pure free market will produce equal income just as pure communism is supposed to .
these stats are so bogus , and tax policy does not change this . most of @@the mega rich## hide their finances . communism and socialism have higher gaps because great wealth is stolen and not tracked . a pure free market will produce equal income just as pure communism is supposed to .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "these", "stats", "are", "so", "bogus", ",", "and", "tax", "policy", "does", "not", "change", "this", ".", "most", "of", "the", "mega", "rich", "hide", "their", "finances", ".", "communism", "and", "socialism", "have", "higher", "gaps", "because", "great", "wealth", "is", "stolen", "and", "not", "tracked", ".", "a", "pure", "free", "market", "will", "produce", "equal", "income", "just", "as", "pure", "communism", "is", "supposed", "to", "." ]
this is a very important point . the slashing of interest rates by the fed is what lead to the housing boom , too many houses being built , and the massive over speculation of house prices . there is no way the free market can be blamed for this because as the article states , the easy money policy is what leads to bad investments because investors saw the economy through the rose colored glasses of low interest rates brought on entirely by the fed . utter nonsense . if you get busted for drinking and driving , do the bartenders who made it easy to get drinks and the dealerships who made it easy to buy a car get the blame ? no . banks were caught up in a prisoners dilemma of monster proportions and as a collective failed to see where their actions were taking them . again , the blame here belongs to the government . it has no business subsidizing financial institutions . because these institutions knew they had government backing , this led to reckless lending and more risk taking that would otherwise not be taken if they had to bear responsibility for losses all on their own ... again , government meddling with financial institutions led to loans being made to people who would otherwise not be able to get a loan for good reason . again , utter nonsense . the fm 's and the cra did n't require the banks and not just the lending banks to make bad decisions . this is not a free market failure because , as shown above , these loans should not have been made in the first place . when the market is n't free because of government meddling , how can you blame the bad outcome on the free market ? again , government subsidies and the fm 's may have made it easier for banks to make poor business decisions a necessary condition but is not a sufficient condition URL . this is definitely not because of the free market . the article clearly states that the easy money policy pursued by the fed caused malinvestment . bs . again , maybe necessary to explain this free market failure , but hardly sufficient . this ultimately boils down to a large conglomeration of businesses who did n't have the foresight to see how their collective action would play out . if it had n't been the housing market , the greedblinded banking institutions would have wound up finding another basis for the credit default swaps which ultimately were the unregulated market which set the markets unraveling after lehman failed . without the cds 's , lehmans failure would have had a marginal impact on the overall economy .
7s9a
Economics
2,008
this is a very important point . the slashing of interest rates by @@the fed## is what lead to the housing boom , too many houses being built , and the massive over speculation of house prices . there is no way the free market can be blamed for this because as the article states , the easy money policy is what leads to bad investments because investors saw the economy through the rose colored glasses of low interest rates brought on entirely by @@the fed## . utter nonsense . if you get busted for drinking and driving , do the bartenders who made it easy to get drinks and the dealerships who made it easy to buy a car get the blame ? no . banks were caught up in a prisoners dilemma of monster proportions and as a collective failed to see where their actions were taking them . again , the blame here belongs to the government . it has no business subsidizing financial institutions . because these institutions knew they had government backing , this led to reckless lending and more risk taking that would otherwise not be taken if they had to bear responsibility for losses all on their own ... again , government meddling with financial institutions led to loans being made to @@people who would otherwise not be able to get a loan## for good reason . again , utter nonsense . the fm 's and the cra did n't require the banks and not just the lending banks to make bad decisions . this is not a free market failure because , as shown above , these loans should not have been made in the first place . when the market is n't free because of government meddling , how can you blame the bad outcome on the free market ? again , government subsidies and the fm 's may have made it easier for banks to make poor business decisions a necessary condition but is not a sufficient condition URL . this is definitely not because of the free market . the article clearly states that the easy money policy pursued by @@the fed## caused malinvestment . bs . again , maybe necessary to explain this free market failure , but hardly sufficient . this ultimately boils down to a large conglomeration of businesses who did n't have the foresight to see how their collective action would play out . if it had n't been the housing market , the @@greedblinded banking institutions## would have wound up finding another basis for the credit default swaps which ultimately were the unregulated market which set the markets unraveling after lehman failed . without the cds 's , lehmans failure would have had a marginal impact on the overall economy .
this is a very important point . the slashing of interest rates by @@the fed## is what lead to the housing boom , too many houses being built , and the massive over speculation of house prices . there is no way the free market can be blamed for this because as the article states , the easy money policy is what leads to bad investments because @@investors## saw the economy through the rose colored glasses of low interest rates brought on entirely by @@the fed## . utter nonsense . if you get busted for drinking and driving , do the bartenders who made it easy to get drinks and the dealerships who made it easy to buy a car get the blame ? no . @@banks## were caught up in a prisoners dilemma of monster proportions and as a collective failed to see where their actions were taking them . again , the blame here belongs to the government . it has no business subsidizing @@financial institutions## . because these institutions knew they had government backing , this led to reckless lending and more risk taking that would otherwise not be taken if they had to bear responsibility for losses all on their own ... again , government meddling with @@financial institutions## led to loans being made to @@people who would otherwise not be able to get a loan## for good reason . again , utter nonsense . the @@fm 's## and the @@cra## did n't require the @@banks## and not just the @@lending banks## to make bad decisions . this is not a free market failure because , as shown above , these loans should not have been made in the first place . when the market is n't free because of government meddling , how can you blame the bad outcome on the free market ? again , government subsidies and the @@fm 's## may have made it easier for @@banks## to make poor business decisions a necessary condition but is not a sufficient condition URL . this is definitely not because of the free market . the article clearly states that the easy money policy pursued by @@the fed## caused malinvestment . bs . again , maybe necessary to explain this free market failure , but hardly sufficient . this ultimately boils down to a large conglomeration of businesses who did n't have the foresight to see how their collective action would play out . if it had n't been the housing market , the @@greedblinded banking institutions## would have wound up finding another basis for the credit default swaps which ultimately were the unregulated market which set the markets unraveling after @@lehman## failed . without the cds 's , lehmans failure would have had a marginal impact on the overall economy .
this is a very important point . the slashing of interest rates by @@the fed## is what lead to the housing boom , too many houses being built , and the massive over speculation of house prices . there is no way the free market can be blamed for this because as the article states , the easy money policy is what leads to bad investments because @@investors## saw the economy through the rose colored glasses of low interest rates brought on entirely by @@the fed## . utter nonsense . if you get busted for drinking and driving , do the bartenders who made it easy to get drinks and the dealerships who made it easy to buy a car get the blame ? no . @@banks## were caught up in a prisoners dilemma of monster proportions and as a collective failed to see where their actions were taking them . again , the blame here belongs to the government . it has no business subsidizing @@financial institutions## . because these institutions knew they had government backing , this led to reckless lending and more risk taking that would otherwise not be taken if they had to bear responsibility for losses all on their own ... again , government meddling with @@financial institutions## led to loans being made to @@people who would otherwise not be able to get a loan## for good reason . again , utter nonsense . the @@fm 's## and the @@cra## did n't require the @@banks## and not just the @@lending banks## to make bad decisions . this is not a free market failure because , as shown above , these loans should not have been made in the first place . when the market is n't free because of government meddling , how can you blame the bad outcome on the free market ? again , government subsidies and the @@fm 's## may have made it easier for @@banks## to make poor business decisions a necessary condition but is not a sufficient condition URL . this is definitely not because of the free market . the article clearly states that the easy money policy pursued by @@the fed## caused malinvestment . bs . again , maybe necessary to explain this free market failure , but hardly sufficient . this ultimately boils down to a large conglomeration of businesses who did n't have the foresight to see how their collective action would play out . if it had n't been the housing market , the @@greedblinded banking institutions## would have wound up finding another basis for the credit default swaps which ultimately were the unregulated market which set the markets unraveling after @@lehman## failed . without the cds 's , lehmans failure would have had a marginal impact on the overall economy .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "this", "is", "a", "very", "important", "point", ".", "the", "slashing", "of", "interest", "rates", "by", "the", "fed", "is", "what", "lead", "to", "the", "housing", "boom", ",", "too", "many", "houses", "being", "built", ",", "and", "the", "massive", "over", "speculation", "of", "house", "prices", ".", "there", "is", "no", "way", "the", "free", "market", "can", "be", "blamed", "for", "this", "because", "as", "the", "article", "states", ",", "the", "easy", "money", "policy", "is", "what", "leads", "to", "bad", "investments", "because", "investors", "saw", "the", "economy", "through", "the", "rose", "colored", "glasses", "of", "low", "interest", "rates", "brought", "on", "entirely", "by", "the", "fed", ".", "utter", "nonsense", ".", "if", "you", "get", "busted", "for", "drinking", "and", "driving", ",", "do", "the", "bartenders", "who", "made", "it", "easy", "to", "get", "drinks", "and", "the", "dealerships", "who", "made", "it", "easy", "to", "buy", "a", "car", "get", "the", "blame", "?", "no", ".", "banks", "were", "caught", "up", "in", "a", "prisoners", "dilemma", "of", "monster", "proportions", "and", "as", "a", "collective", "failed", "to", "see", "where", "their", "actions", "were", "taking", "them", ".", "again", ",", "the", "blame", "here", "belongs", "to", "the", "government", ".", "it", "has", "no", "business", "subsidizing", "financial", "institutions", ".", "because", "these", "institutions", "knew", "they", "had", "government", "backing", ",", "this", "led", "to", "reckless", "lending", "and", "more", "risk", "taking", "that", "would", "otherwise", "not", "be", "taken", "if", "they", "had", "to", "bear", "responsibility", "for", "losses", "all", "on", "their", "own", "...", "again", ",", "government", "meddling", "with", "financial", "institutions", "led", "to", "loans", "being", "made", "to", "people", "who", "would", "otherwise", "not", "be", "able", "to", "get", "a", "loan", "for", "good", "reason", ".", "again", ",", "utter", "nonsense", ".", "the", "fm", "'s", "and", "the", "cra", "did", "n't", "require", "the", "banks", "and", "not", "just", "the", "lending", "banks", "to", "make", "bad", "decisions", ".", "this", "is", "not", "a", "free", "market", "failure", "because", ",", "as", "shown", "above", ",", "these", "loans", "should", "not", "have", "been", "made", "in", "the", "first", "place", ".", "when", "the", "market", "is", "n't", "free", "because", "of", "government", "meddling", ",", "how", "can", "you", "blame", "the", "bad", "outcome", "on", "the", "free", "market", "?", "again", ",", "government", "subsidies", "and", "the", "fm", "'s", "may", "have", "made", "it", "easier", "for", "banks", "to", "make", "poor", "business", "decisions", "a", "necessary", "condition", "but", "is", "not", "a", "sufficient", "condition", "URL", ".", "this", "is", "definitely", "not", "because", "of", "the", "free", "market", ".", "the", "article", "clearly", "states", "that", "the", "easy", "money", "policy", "pursued", "by", "the", "fed", "caused", "malinvestment", ".", "bs", ".", "again", ",", "maybe", "necessary", "to", "explain", "this", "free", "market", "failure", ",", "but", "hardly", "sufficient", ".", "this", "ultimately", "boils", "down", "to", "a", "large", "conglomeration", "of", "businesses", "who", "did", "n't", "have", "the", "foresight", "to", "see", "how", "their", "collective", "action", "would", "play", "out", ".", "if", "it", "had", "n't", "been", "the", "housing", "market", ",", "the", "greedblinded", "banking", "institutions", "would", "have", "wound", "up", "finding", "another", "basis", "for", "the", "credit", "default", "swaps", "which", "ultimately", "were", "the", "unregulated", "market", "which", "set", "the", "markets", "unraveling", "after", "lehman", "failed", ".", "without", "the", "cds", "'s", ",", "lehmans", "failure", "would", "have", "had", "a", "marginal", "impact", "on", "the", "overall", "economy", "." ]
bc i keep forgetting to work on the articles i started .
c05jk1h
Economics
2,008
bc i keep forgetting to work on the articles i started .
bc i keep forgetting to work on the articles i started .
bc i keep forgetting to work on the articles i started .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "bc", "i", "keep", "forgetting", "to", "work", "on", "the", "articles", "i", "started", "." ]
who cares about the fed funds rate ? the funds rate is almost a meaningless statistic in 2008. money is getting injected into the economy by bailouts and government sponsored entities now .
c054f04
Economics
2,008
who cares about @@the fed## funds rate ? the funds rate is almost a meaningless statistic in 2008. money is getting injected into the economy by bailouts and @@government sponsored entities## now .
who cares about the fed funds rate ? the funds rate is almost a meaningless statistic in 2008. money is getting injected into the economy by bailouts and government sponsored entities now .
who cares about @@the fed## funds rate ? the funds rate is almost a meaningless statistic in 2008. money is getting injected into the economy by bailouts and @@government sponsored entities## now .
[ "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0 ]
[ "who", "cares", "about", "the", "fed", "funds", "rate", "?", "the", "funds", "rate", "is", "almost", "a", "meaningless", "statistic", "in", "2008.", "money", "is", "getting", "injected", "into", "the", "economy", "by", "bailouts", "and", "government", "sponsored", "entities", "now", "." ]
i 'm not celebrating xmas this year . i 'd rather pay the rent .
c06c4ma
Economics
2,008
i 'm not celebrating xmas this year . i 'd rather pay the rent .
i 'm not celebrating xmas this year . i 'd rather pay the rent .
i 'm not celebrating xmas this year . i 'd rather pay the rent .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "'m", "not", "celebrating", "xmas", "this", "year", ".", "i", "'d", "rather", "pay", "the", "rent", "." ]
all their gas are belong to us
c056ih2
Economics
2,008
all their gas are belong to us
all their gas are belong to us
all their gas are belong to us
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "all", "their", "gas", "are", "belong", "to", "us" ]
really ? 60barrel equates to about 1.20gallon after refining without considering transportation costs , taxes , or profit . and that 's assuming that corn ethanol additives cost next to nothing . what 's the average around cinci ?
c06b7zb
Economics
2,008
really ? 60barrel equates to about 1.20gallon after refining without considering transportation costs , taxes , or profit . and that 's assuming that corn ethanol additives cost next to nothing . what 's the average around cinci ?
really ? 60barrel equates to about 1.20gallon after refining without considering transportation costs , taxes , or profit . and that 's assuming that corn ethanol additives cost next to nothing . what 's the average around cinci ?
really ? 60barrel equates to about 1.20gallon after refining without considering transportation costs , taxes , or profit . and that 's assuming that corn ethanol additives cost next to nothing . what 's the average around cinci ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "really", "?", "60barrel", "equates", "to", "about", "1.20gallon", "after", "refining", "without", "considering", "transportation", "costs", ",", "taxes", ",", "or", "profit", ".", "and", "that", "'s", "assuming", "that", "corn", "ethanol", "additives", "cost", "next", "to", "nothing", ".", "what", "'s", "the", "average", "around", "cinci", "?" ]
i do n't like the republican party , so i 'll not vote for ron paul just because of that . thanks paulerdos , your logic is perfect .
c03wpnm
Economics
2,008
i do n't like the @@republican party## , so i 'll not vote for ron paul just because of that . thanks paulerdos , your logic is perfect .
i do n't like the @@republican party## , so i 'll not vote for ron paul just because of that . thanks paulerdos , your logic is perfect .
i do n't like the @@republican party## , so i 'll not vote for ron paul just because of that . thanks paulerdos , your logic is perfect .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "do", "n't", "like", "the", "republican", "party", ",", "so", "i", "'ll", "not", "vote", "for", "ron", "paul", "just", "because", "of", "that", ".", "thanks", "paulerdos", ",", "your", "logic", "is", "perfect", "." ]
center for american progress fellow robert gordon 19 noted that approximately half of the subprime loans were made by independent mortgage companies that were not regulated by the cra and thus had no government obligation to offer credit to minorities . in the later part of the crisis , these mortgage companies made subprime loans at twice the rate of cra banks . another third of the major subprime lenders were regulated but had very little cra involvement . 20 '' URL you 're right . there were plenty of people who got bad loans who were n't poor minorities .
c05rd26
Economics
2,008
center for american progress fellow robert gordon 19 noted that approximately half of the subprime loans were made by @@independent mortgage companies that were not regulated by the cra## and thus had no government obligation to offer credit to minorities . in the later part of the crisis , these mortgage companies made subprime loans at twice the rate of cra banks . another third of the major subprime lenders were regulated but had very little cra involvement . 20 '' URL you 're right . there were plenty of people who got bad loans who were n't @@poor minorities## .
center for american progress fellow robert gordon 19 noted that approximately half of the subprime loans were made by @@independent mortgage companies## that were not regulated by the @@cra## and thus had no government obligation to offer credit to minorities . in the later part of the crisis , these mortgage companies made subprime loans at twice the rate of @@cra banks## . another third of the major subprime lenders were regulated but had very little cra involvement . 20 '' URL you 're right . there were plenty of @@people who got bad loans who were n't poor minorities## .
center for american progress fellow robert gordon 19 noted that approximately half of the subprime loans were made by @@independent mortgage companies that were not regulated by the cra## and thus had no government obligation to offer credit to minorities . in the later part of the crisis , these mortgage companies made subprime loans at twice the rate of @@cra banks## . another third of the major subprime lenders were regulated but had very little cra involvement . 20 '' URL you 're right . there were plenty of @@people who got bad loans who were n't poor minorities## .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0 ]
[ "center", "for", "american", "progress", "fellow", "robert", "gordon", "19", "noted", "that", "approximately", "half", "of", "the", "subprime", "loans", "were", "made", "by", "independent", "mortgage", "companies", "that", "were", "not", "regulated", "by", "the", "cra", "and", "thus", "had", "no", "government", "obligation", "to", "offer", "credit", "to", "minorities", ".", "in", "the", "later", "part", "of", "the", "crisis", ",", "these", "mortgage", "companies", "made", "subprime", "loans", "at", "twice", "the", "rate", "of", "cra", "banks", ".", "another", "third", "of", "the", "major", "subprime", "lenders", "were", "regulated", "but", "had", "very", "little", "cra", "involvement", ".", "20", "``", "URL", "you", "'re", "right", ".", "there", "were", "plenty", "of", "people", "who", "got", "bad", "loans", "who", "were", "n't", "poor", "minorities", "." ]
umm , assuming the mexican tomato is cheaper , no . what makes you assume that ? it sounds like you think trading with foreign countries is automatically bad for the environment ? it sounds like you do n't know how to read .
c0695xu
Economics
2,008
umm , assuming the mexican tomato is cheaper , no . what makes you assume that ? it sounds like you think trading with foreign countries is automatically bad for the environment ? it sounds like you do n't know how to read .
umm , assuming the mexican tomato is cheaper , no . what makes you assume that ? it sounds like you think trading with foreign countries is automatically bad for the environment ? it sounds like you do n't know how to read .
umm , assuming the mexican tomato is cheaper , no . what makes you assume that ? it sounds like you think trading with foreign countries is automatically bad for the environment ? it sounds like you do n't know how to read .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "umm", ",", "assuming", "the", "mexican", "tomato", "is", "cheaper", ",", "no", ".", "what", "makes", "you", "assume", "that", "?", "it", "sounds", "like", "you", "think", "trading", "with", "foreign", "countries", "is", "automatically", "bad", "for", "the", "environment", "?", "it", "sounds", "like", "you", "do", "n't", "know", "how", "to", "read", "." ]
i agree . and i 've learnt more about economics here than in many years of reading economics news .
c0638i0
Economics
2,008
i agree . and i 've learnt more about economics here than in many years of reading economics news .
i agree . and i 've learnt more about economics here than in many years of reading economics news .
i agree . and i 've learnt more about economics here than in many years of reading economics news .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "agree", ".", "and", "i", "'ve", "learnt", "more", "about", "economics", "here", "than", "in", "many", "years", "of", "reading", "economics", "news", "." ]
have you ever encountered a historical event no . neither have you . i 've encountered assertions about historical events . that did not jive you mean , that contradicted ? you know that ' a contradicts b ' does not imply that a is true and b is false , right ? with austrian economics ? yes , i answer this above .
c042l9w
Economics
2,008
have you ever encountered a historical event no . neither have you . i 've encountered assertions about historical events . that did not jive you mean , that contradicted ? you know that ' a contradicts b ' does not imply that a is true and b is false , right ? with austrian economics ? yes , i answer this above .
have you ever encountered a historical event no . neither have you . i 've encountered assertions about historical events . that did not jive you mean , that contradicted ? you know that ' a contradicts b ' does not imply that a is true and b is false , right ? with austrian economics ? yes , i answer this above .
have you ever encountered a historical event no . neither have you . i 've encountered assertions about historical events . that did not jive you mean , that contradicted ? you know that ' a contradicts b ' does not imply that a is true and b is false , right ? with austrian economics ? yes , i answer this above .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "have", "you", "ever", "encountered", "a", "historical", "event", "no", ".", "neither", "have", "you", ".", "i", "'ve", "encountered", "assertions", "about", "historical", "events", ".", "that", "did", "not", "jive", "you", "mean", ",", "that", "contradicted", "?", "you", "know", "that", "'", "a", "contradicts", "b", "'", "does", "not", "imply", "that", "a", "is", "true", "and", "b", "is", "false", ",", "right", "?", "with", "austrian", "economics", "?", "yes", ",", "i", "answer", "this", "above", "." ]
but what kind of entertainment would that be to the ones actually paying attention ?
c05q4ec
Economics
2,008
but what kind of entertainment would that be to the ones actually paying attention ?
but what kind of entertainment would that be to the ones actually paying attention ?
but what kind of entertainment would that be to the ones actually paying attention ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "but", "what", "kind", "of", "entertainment", "would", "that", "be", "to", "the", "ones", "actually", "paying", "attention", "?" ]
ha . i thought they meant vix , the cboe implied volatility index .
c04q19g
Economics
2,008
ha . i thought they meant vix , the cboe implied volatility index .
ha . i thought they meant vix , the cboe implied volatility index .
ha . i thought they meant vix , the cboe implied volatility index .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "ha", ".", "i", "thought", "they", "meant", "vix", ",", "the", "cboe", "implied", "volatility", "index", "." ]
both obama and mccain are cfr and aipac puppets with no clues on economics , ruled by people behind the scenes . over 90 of politicians are lawyers .
c05fzpe
Economics
2,008
both obama and mccain are cfr and aipac puppets with no clues on economics , ruled by people behind the scenes . over 90 of @@politicians## are @@lawyers## .
both obama and mccain are cfr and @@aipac## puppets with no clues on economics , ruled by people behind the scenes . over 90 of @@politicians## are @@lawyers## .
both obama and mccain are cfr and aipac puppets with no clues on economics , ruled by people behind the scenes . over 90 of @@politicians## are @@lawyers## .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0 ]
[ "both", "obama", "and", "mccain", "are", "cfr", "and", "aipac", "puppets", "with", "no", "clues", "on", "economics", ",", "ruled", "by", "people", "behind", "the", "scenes", ".", "over", "90", "of", "politicians", "are", "lawyers", "." ]
but there 's a big degree of difference there . wood has a direct use that ca n't be denied . it can be used for building shelter , heating spaces and cooking food . gold could very reasonably stop being demanded . people buy it because it is valuable , not because it is of use to them . if a few people suddenly decide it 's no longer valuable , the system falls apart as our current system is . tangible , real value goods are much better as they have a value floor '' if you will . there 's drawbacks to any conceivable currency , but as a baseline a good candidate should have a strong inherent value . gold and paper money do n't .
c06fuky
Economics
2,008
but there 's a big degree of difference there . wood has a direct use that ca n't be denied . it can be used for building shelter , heating spaces and cooking food . gold could very reasonably stop being demanded . people buy it because it is valuable , not because it is of use to them . if a few people suddenly decide it 's no longer valuable , the system falls apart as our current system is . tangible , real value goods are much better as they have a value floor '' if you will . there 's drawbacks to any conceivable currency , but as a baseline a good candidate should have a strong inherent value . gold and paper money do n't .
but there 's a big degree of difference there . wood has a direct use that ca n't be denied . it can be used for building shelter , heating spaces and cooking food . gold could very reasonably stop being demanded . people buy it because it is valuable , not because it is of use to them . if a few people suddenly decide it 's no longer valuable , the system falls apart as our current system is . tangible , real value goods are much better as they have a value floor '' if you will . there 's drawbacks to any conceivable currency , but as a baseline a good candidate should have a strong inherent value . gold and paper money do n't .
but there 's a big degree of difference there . wood has a direct use that ca n't be denied . it can be used for building shelter , heating spaces and cooking food . gold could very reasonably stop being demanded . people buy it because it is valuable , not because it is of use to them . if a few people suddenly decide it 's no longer valuable , the system falls apart as our current system is . tangible , real value goods are much better as they have a value floor '' if you will . there 's drawbacks to any conceivable currency , but as a baseline a good candidate should have a strong inherent value . gold and paper money do n't .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "but", "there", "'s", "a", "big", "degree", "of", "difference", "there", ".", "wood", "has", "a", "direct", "use", "that", "ca", "n't", "be", "denied", ".", "it", "can", "be", "used", "for", "building", "shelter", ",", "heating", "spaces", "and", "cooking", "food", ".", "gold", "could", "very", "reasonably", "stop", "being", "demanded", ".", "people", "buy", "it", "because", "it", "is", "valuable", ",", "not", "because", "it", "is", "of", "use", "to", "them", ".", "if", "a", "few", "people", "suddenly", "decide", "it", "'s", "no", "longer", "valuable", ",", "the", "system", "falls", "apart", "as", "our", "current", "system", "is", ".", "tangible", ",", "real", "value", "goods", "are", "much", "better", "as", "they", "have", "a", "value", "floor", "``", "if", "you", "will", ".", "there", "'s", "drawbacks", "to", "any", "conceivable", "currency", ",", "but", "as", "a", "baseline", "a", "good", "candidate", "should", "have", "a", "strong", "inherent", "value", ".", "gold", "and", "paper", "money", "do", "n't", "." ]
i can see no reason at all why it has n't yet . all you need is a phone .
c04tcjy
Economics
2,008
i can see no reason at all why it has n't yet . all you need is a phone .
i can see no reason at all why it has n't yet . all you need is a phone .
i can see no reason at all why it has n't yet . all you need is a phone .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "can", "see", "no", "reason", "at", "all", "why", "it", "has", "n't", "yet", ".", "all", "you", "need", "is", "a", "phone", "." ]
seems like it wo n't help the elitist smug asshole epidemic .
c06a9ka
Economics
2,008
seems like it wo n't help the elitist smug asshole epidemic .
seems like it wo n't help the elitist smug asshole epidemic .
seems like it wo n't help the elitist smug asshole epidemic .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "seems", "like", "it", "wo", "n't", "help", "the", "elitist", "smug", "asshole", "epidemic", "." ]
so what 's the over under on change ?
4nak
Economics
2,008
so what 's the over under on change ?
so what 's the over under on change ?
so what 's the over under on change ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "so", "what", "'s", "the", "over", "under", "on", "change", "?" ]
i just moved to cambridge last year . i signed up with a new doctor , and my wait for a physical was about a month , mainly because i wanted a morning appointment . i could n't comment on problems in rural areas , but i went to a hospital in walking distance from where i live . by the way , if specialists did n't make 500k per year on average , health care would n't cost quite so much .
c03mxx7
Economics
2,008
i just moved to cambridge last year . i signed up with a new doctor , and my wait for a physical was about a month , mainly because i wanted a morning appointment . i could n't comment on problems in rural areas , but i went to a hospital in walking distance from where i live . by the way , if specialists did n't make 500k per year on average , health care would n't cost quite so much .
i just moved to cambridge last year . i signed up with a new doctor , and my wait for a physical was about a month , mainly because i wanted a morning appointment . i could n't comment on problems in rural areas , but i went to a hospital in walking distance from where i live . by the way , if @@specialists## did n't make 500k per year on average , health care would n't cost quite so much .
i just moved to cambridge last year . i signed up with a new doctor , and my wait for a physical was about a month , mainly because i wanted a morning appointment . i could n't comment on problems in rural areas , but i went to a hospital in walking distance from where i live . by the way , if @@specialists## did n't make 500k per year on average , health care would n't cost quite so much .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "just", "moved", "to", "cambridge", "last", "year", ".", "i", "signed", "up", "with", "a", "new", "doctor", ",", "and", "my", "wait", "for", "a", "physical", "was", "about", "a", "month", ",", "mainly", "because", "i", "wanted", "a", "morning", "appointment", ".", "i", "could", "n't", "comment", "on", "problems", "in", "rural", "areas", ",", "but", "i", "went", "to", "a", "hospital", "in", "walking", "distance", "from", "where", "i", "live", ".", "by", "the", "way", ",", "if", "specialists", "did", "n't", "make", "500k", "per", "year", "on", "average", ",", "health", "care", "would", "n't", "cost", "quite", "so", "much", "." ]
this exists in a universe apart from the present one , with its massive american and un 'aid ' to poor countries .
c03dfyd
Economics
2,008
this exists in a universe apart from the present one , with its massive american and un 'aid ' to @@poor countries## .
this exists in a universe apart from the present one , with its massive american and un 'aid ' to @@poor countries## .
this exists in a universe apart from the present one , with its massive american and un 'aid ' to @@poor countries## .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0 ]
[ "this", "exists", "in", "a", "universe", "apart", "from", "the", "present", "one", ",", "with", "its", "massive", "american", "and", "un", "'aid", "'", "to", "poor", "countries", "." ]
zero points after 904 milliseconds there 's no censorship on red dit , comrades !
c03lz3d
Economics
2,008
zero points after 904 milliseconds there 's no censorship on red dit , comrades !
zero points after 904 milliseconds there 's no censorship on red dit , @@comrades## !
zero points after 904 milliseconds there 's no censorship on red dit , comrades !
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "zero", "points", "after", "904", "milliseconds", "there", "'s", "no", "censorship", "on", "red", "dit", ",", "comrades", "!" ]
but , but , but , lynch mobs are so much fun . agree 100
c062a0j
Economics
2,008
but , but , but , lynch mobs are so much fun . agree 100
but , but , but , lynch mobs are so much fun . agree 100
but , but , but , lynch mobs are so much fun . agree 100
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "but", ",", "but", ",", "but", ",", "lynch", "mobs", "are", "so", "much", "fun", ".", "agree", "100" ]
is there anything that may force you think otherwise , short of a catastrophic failure of indexpricecentralbank run economies ? i guess not , but can always be wrong .
c04ydek
Economics
2,008
is there anything that may force you think otherwise , short of a catastrophic failure of indexpricecentralbank run economies ? i guess not , but can always be wrong .
is there anything that may force you think otherwise , short of a catastrophic failure of indexpricecentralbank run economies ? i guess not , but can always be wrong .
is there anything that may force you think otherwise , short of a catastrophic failure of indexpricecentralbank run economies ? i guess not , but can always be wrong .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "is", "there", "anything", "that", "may", "force", "you", "think", "otherwise", ",", "short", "of", "a", "catastrophic", "failure", "of", "indexpricecentralbank", "run", "economies", "?", "i", "guess", "not", ",", "but", "can", "always", "be", "wrong", "." ]
so the 76k i still owe is floating around on the markets for 15.2k ... hmm
c05n9pu
Economics
2,008
so the 76k i still owe is floating around on the markets for 15.2k ... hmm
so the 76k i still owe is floating around on the markets for 15.2k ... hmm
so the 76k i still owe is floating around on the markets for 15.2k ... hmm
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "so", "the", "76k", "i", "still", "owe", "is", "floating", "around", "on", "the", "markets", "for", "15.2k", "...", "hmm" ]
do you have a timeline , because i sure could use some good news .
c06s9no
Economics
2,008
do you have a timeline , because i sure could use some good news .
do you have a timeline , because i sure could use some good news .
do you have a timeline , because i sure could use some good news .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "do", "you", "have", "a", "timeline", ",", "because", "i", "sure", "could", "use", "some", "good", "news", "." ]
the only way to prevent this from happening is to create a new bretton woods agreement and peg money to gold ... edit i did n't know what was after trillion
c05ny61
Economics
2,008
the only way to prevent this from happening is to create a new bretton woods agreement and peg money to gold ... edit i did n't know what was after trillion
the only way to prevent this from happening is to create a new bretton woods agreement and peg money to gold ... edit i did n't know what was after trillion
the only way to prevent this from happening is to create a new bretton woods agreement and peg money to gold ... edit i did n't know what was after trillion
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "only", "way", "to", "prevent", "this", "from", "happening", "is", "to", "create", "a", "new", "bretton", "woods", "agreement", "and", "peg", "money", "to", "gold", "...", "edit", "i", "did", "n't", "know", "what", "was", "after", "trillion" ]
my theory is natural selection if you live in a world of distant islands it pays to have some reserves when undertaking sea travel . you know how the typical hawaiian looks in cartoons .
c05oumf
Economics
2,008
my theory is natural selection if you live in a world of distant islands it pays to have some reserves when undertaking sea travel . you know how the typical hawaiian looks in cartoons .
my theory is natural selection if you live in a world of distant islands it pays to have some reserves when undertaking sea travel . you know how the typical hawaiian looks in cartoons .
my theory is natural selection if you live in a world of distant islands it pays to have some reserves when undertaking sea travel . you know how the typical hawaiian looks in cartoons .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "my", "theory", "is", "natural", "selection", "if", "you", "live", "in", "a", "world", "of", "distant", "islands", "it", "pays", "to", "have", "some", "reserves", "when", "undertaking", "sea", "travel", ".", "you", "know", "how", "the", "typical", "hawaiian", "looks", "in", "cartoons", "." ]
well the prc is governed under a single party system by the communist party of china . i 'm not saying the actions of the chinese government have much in common with the textbook definition of 'communism ' but this is probably why people call the chinese communists .
c066bmm
Economics
2,008
well @@the prc## is governed under a single party system by the @@communist party of china## . i 'm not saying the actions of the @@chinese government## have much in common with the textbook definition of 'communism ' but this is probably why people call @@the chinese## @@communists## .
well @@the prc## is governed under a single party system by the @@communist party of china## . i 'm not saying the actions of the @@chinese government## have much in common with the textbook definition of 'communism ' but this is probably why people call @@the chinese## @@communists## .
well @@the prc## is governed under a single party system by the @@communist party of china## . i 'm not saying the actions of the @@chinese government## have much in common with the textbook definition of 'communism ' but this is probably why people call @@the chinese## @@communists## .
[ "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "B", "O" ]
[ 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 2, 0 ]
[ "well", "the", "prc", "is", "governed", "under", "a", "single", "party", "system", "by", "the", "communist", "party", "of", "china", ".", "i", "'m", "not", "saying", "the", "actions", "of", "the", "chinese", "government", "have", "much", "in", "common", "with", "the", "textbook", "definition", "of", "'communism", "'", "but", "this", "is", "probably", "why", "people", "call", "the", "chinese", "communists", "." ]
read the report URL gross monthly earnings at the uk minimum wage 1105 are 5 times as high as at the minimum wage in poland 201 and almost 20 times higher than in bulgaria 56 . sounds like plenty of benefit to me . moreover , the benefit of increased productivity is the incentive payment that motivates that increase . grip ? got one , thanks .
c055o7o
Economics
2,008
read the report URL gross monthly earnings at the uk minimum wage 1105 are 5 times as high as at the minimum wage in poland 201 and almost 20 times higher than in bulgaria 56 . sounds like plenty of benefit to me . moreover , the benefit of increased productivity is the incentive payment that motivates that increase . grip ? got one , thanks .
read the report URL gross monthly earnings at the uk minimum wage 1105 are 5 times as high as at the minimum wage in poland 201 and almost 20 times higher than in bulgaria 56 . sounds like plenty of benefit to me . moreover , the benefit of increased productivity is the incentive payment that motivates that increase . grip ? got one , thanks .
read the report URL gross monthly earnings at the uk minimum wage 1105 are 5 times as high as at the minimum wage in poland 201 and almost 20 times higher than in bulgaria 56 . sounds like plenty of benefit to me . moreover , the benefit of increased productivity is the incentive payment that motivates that increase . grip ? got one , thanks .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "read", "the", "report", "URL", "gross", "monthly", "earnings", "at", "the", "uk", "minimum", "wage", "1105", "are", "5", "times", "as", "high", "as", "at", "the", "minimum", "wage", "in", "poland", "201", "and", "almost", "20", "times", "higher", "than", "in", "bulgaria", "56", ".", "sounds", "like", "plenty", "of", "benefit", "to", "me", ".", "moreover", ",", "the", "benefit", "of", "increased", "productivity", "is", "the", "incentive", "payment", "that", "motivates", "that", "increase", ".", "grip", "?", "got", "one", ",", "thanks", "." ]
first , what tortured reason do you see in hoppe 's piece ? there was an allegation with no substance in that attack . you 're still missing the point as to what economics models . mainstream economists make the mistake of trying predict the content of economic decisions and policies . but this is impossible to do considering economic decisions are based on human actions and you can not isolate variables in the way that you can in the lab . believing that you can do so is the fatal flaw '' that got us into this mess we have a bunch of really smart people thinking they can run the system . just look at ltcm there was a group of nobel prize winning economists and mathematicians . they thought their little empirical models and such were perfect . they ended up being the largest financial disaster in the last 20 years before these past few weeks . the austrians on the other hand seek to describe the form of economic activity and the necessarily true deductions you can make . keynes masked these individual actions by using aggregates and was summarily demolished multiple times by hayek . keynes even responded to one of hayek 's whippings by saying , that was long ago , i do n't believe that anymore ... . unfortunately , keynes 's nonsense was far more appealing to politicians since it would increase their power . also , the austrians do n't make value judgments about policies . the form of austrian arguments is if ... policy is implemented ... then , result . '' whereas neoclassical , or mainstream economists argue by saying , we should ... '' the problems with the neoclassical stance are too many to count . but i 'd say the most damning criticism is that what they suggest is basically social engineering . in essence , what you 're trying to do is use the wrong tools for the job . it 's tantamount to bringing a microscope out under the stars and saying you found something out about the planets . and as for mises and rothbard ... i use them as examples simply because they 're the best . rothbard in particular is good because he writes very clearly . there 's also hayek , megner , bohmbawerk very hard to read , be warned , hazlitt very easy to read . some more contemporary austrians are salerno , reisman , gordon , murphy , etc .
c05jgd7
Economics
2,008
first , what tortured reason do you see in hoppe 's piece ? there was an allegation with no substance in that attack . you 're still missing the point as to what economics models . @@mainstream economists## make the mistake of trying predict the content of economic decisions and policies . but this is impossible to do considering economic decisions are based on human actions and you can not isolate variables in the way that you can in the lab . believing that you can do so is the fatal flaw '' that got us into this mess we have a @@bunch of really smart people## thinking they can run the system . just look at @@ltcm## there was a @@group of nobel prize winning economists and mathematicians## . they thought their little empirical models and such were perfect . they ended up being the largest financial disaster in the last 20 years before these past few weeks . @@the austrians## on the other hand seek to describe the form of economic activity and the necessarily true deductions you can make . keynes masked these individual actions by using aggregates and was summarily demolished multiple times by hayek . keynes even responded to one of hayek 's whippings by saying , that was long ago , i do n't believe that anymore ... . unfortunately , keynes 's nonsense was far more appealing to politicians since it would increase their power . also , @@the austrians## do n't make value judgments about policies . the form of austrian arguments is if ... policy is implemented ... then , result . '' whereas neoclassical , or @@mainstream economists## argue by saying , we should ... '' the problems with the neoclassical stance are too many to count . but i 'd say the most damning criticism is that what they suggest is basically social engineering . in essence , what you 're trying to do is use the wrong tools for the job . it 's tantamount to bringing a microscope out under the stars and saying you found something out about the planets . and as for mises and rothbard ... i use them as examples simply because they 're the best . rothbard in particular is good because he writes very clearly . there 's also hayek , megner , bohmbawerk very hard to read , be warned , hazlitt very easy to read . some more @@contemporary austrians## are salerno , reisman , gordon , murphy , etc .
first , what tortured reason do you see in hoppe 's piece ? there was an allegation with no substance in that attack . you 're still missing the point as to what economics models . @@mainstream economists## make the mistake of trying predict the content of economic decisions and policies . but this is impossible to do considering economic decisions are based on human actions and you can not isolate variables in the way that you can in the lab . believing that you can do so is the fatal flaw '' that got us into this mess we have a bunch of really @@smart people thinking they can run the system## . just look at @@ltcm## there was a group of @@nobel prize winning economists and mathematicians## . they thought their little empirical models and such were perfect . they ended up being the largest financial disaster in the last 20 years before these past few weeks . the @@austrians## on the other hand seek to describe the form of economic activity and the necessarily true deductions you can make . keynes masked these individual actions by using aggregates and was summarily demolished multiple times by hayek . keynes even responded to one of hayek 's whippings by saying , that was long ago , i do n't believe that anymore ... . unfortunately , keynes 's nonsense was far more appealing to @@politicians## since it would increase their power . also , the @@austrians## do n't make value judgments about policies . the form of austrian arguments is if ... policy is implemented ... then , result . '' whereas neoclassical , or @@mainstream economists## argue by saying , we should ... '' the problems with the neoclassical stance are too many to count . but i 'd say the most damning criticism is that what they suggest is basically social engineering . in essence , what you 're trying to do is use the wrong tools for the job . it 's tantamount to bringing a microscope out under the stars and saying you found something out about the planets . and as for mises and rothbard ... i use them as examples simply because they 're the best . rothbard in particular is good because he writes very clearly . there 's also hayek , megner , bohmbawerk very hard to read , be warned , hazlitt very easy to read . some more @@contemporary austrians## are salerno , reisman , gordon , murphy , etc .
first , what tortured reason do you see in hoppe 's piece ? there was an allegation with no substance in that attack . you 're still missing the point as to what economics models . @@mainstream economists## make the mistake of trying predict the content of economic decisions and policies . but this is impossible to do considering economic decisions are based on human actions and you can not isolate variables in the way that you can in the lab . believing that you can do so is the fatal flaw '' that got us into this mess we have a bunch of really @@smart people thinking they can run the system## . just look at @@ltcm## there was a group of @@nobel prize winning economists and mathematicians## . they thought their little empirical models and such were perfect . they ended up being the largest financial disaster in the last 20 years before these past few weeks . the @@austrians## on the other hand seek to describe the form of economic activity and the necessarily true deductions you can make . keynes masked these individual actions by using aggregates and was summarily demolished multiple times by hayek . keynes even responded to one of hayek 's whippings by saying , that was long ago , i do n't believe that anymore ... . unfortunately , keynes 's nonsense was far more appealing to @@politicians## since it would increase their power . also , the @@austrians## do n't make value judgments about policies . the form of austrian arguments is if ... policy is implemented ... then , result . '' whereas neoclassical , or @@mainstream economists## argue by saying , we should ... '' the problems with the neoclassical stance are too many to count . but i 'd say the most damning criticism is that what they suggest is basically social engineering . in essence , what you 're trying to do is use the wrong tools for the job . it 's tantamount to bringing a microscope out under the stars and saying you found something out about the planets . and as for mises and rothbard ... i use them as examples simply because they 're the best . rothbard in particular is good because he writes very clearly . there 's also hayek , megner , bohmbawerk very hard to read , be warned , hazlitt very easy to read . some more @@contemporary austrians## are salerno , reisman , gordon , murphy , etc .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "first", ",", "what", "tortured", "reason", "do", "you", "see", "in", "hoppe", "'s", "piece", "?", "there", "was", "an", "allegation", "with", "no", "substance", "in", "that", "attack", ".", "you", "'re", "still", "missing", "the", "point", "as", "to", "what", "economics", "models", ".", "mainstream", "economists", "make", "the", "mistake", "of", "trying", "predict", "the", "content", "of", "economic", "decisions", "and", "policies", ".", "but", "this", "is", "impossible", "to", "do", "considering", "economic", "decisions", "are", "based", "on", "human", "actions", "and", "you", "can", "not", "isolate", "variables", "in", "the", "way", "that", "you", "can", "in", "the", "lab", ".", "believing", "that", "you", "can", "do", "so", "is", "the", "fatal", "flaw", "``", "that", "got", "us", "into", "this", "mess", "we", "have", "a", "bunch", "of", "really", "smart", "people", "thinking", "they", "can", "run", "the", "system", ".", "just", "look", "at", "ltcm", "there", "was", "a", "group", "of", "nobel", "prize", "winning", "economists", "and", "mathematicians", ".", "they", "thought", "their", "little", "empirical", "models", "and", "such", "were", "perfect", ".", "they", "ended", "up", "being", "the", "largest", "financial", "disaster", "in", "the", "last", "20", "years", "before", "these", "past", "few", "weeks", ".", "the", "austrians", "on", "the", "other", "hand", "seek", "to", "describe", "the", "form", "of", "economic", "activity", "and", "the", "necessarily", "true", "deductions", "you", "can", "make", ".", "keynes", "masked", "these", "individual", "actions", "by", "using", "aggregates", "and", "was", "summarily", "demolished", "multiple", "times", "by", "hayek", ".", "keynes", "even", "responded", "to", "one", "of", "hayek", "'s", "whippings", "by", "saying", ",", "that", "was", "long", "ago", ",", "i", "do", "n't", "believe", "that", "anymore", "...", ".", "unfortunately", ",", "keynes", "'s", "nonsense", "was", "far", "more", "appealing", "to", "politicians", "since", "it", "would", "increase", "their", "power", ".", "also", ",", "the", "austrians", "do", "n't", "make", "value", "judgments", "about", "policies", ".", "the", "form", "of", "austrian", "arguments", "is", "if", "...", "policy", "is", "implemented", "...", "then", ",", "result", ".", "``", "whereas", "neoclassical", ",", "or", "mainstream", "economists", "argue", "by", "saying", ",", "we", "should", "...", "``", "the", "problems", "with", "the", "neoclassical", "stance", "are", "too", "many", "to", "count", ".", "but", "i", "'d", "say", "the", "most", "damning", "criticism", "is", "that", "what", "they", "suggest", "is", "basically", "social", "engineering", ".", "in", "essence", ",", "what", "you", "'re", "trying", "to", "do", "is", "use", "the", "wrong", "tools", "for", "the", "job", ".", "it", "'s", "tantamount", "to", "bringing", "a", "microscope", "out", "under", "the", "stars", "and", "saying", "you", "found", "something", "out", "about", "the", "planets", ".", "and", "as", "for", "mises", "and", "rothbard", "...", "i", "use", "them", "as", "examples", "simply", "because", "they", "'re", "the", "best", ".", "rothbard", "in", "particular", "is", "good", "because", "he", "writes", "very", "clearly", ".", "there", "'s", "also", "hayek", ",", "megner", ",", "bohmbawerk", "very", "hard", "to", "read", ",", "be", "warned", ",", "hazlitt", "very", "easy", "to", "read", ".", "some", "more", "contemporary", "austrians", "are", "salerno", ",", "reisman", ",", "gordon", ",", "murphy", ",", "etc", "." ]
for the love of pete , do not prepare for your own future . buy macbooks instead .
c06d9tm
Economics
2,008
for the love of pete , do not prepare for your own future . buy macbooks instead .
for the love of pete , do not prepare for your own future . buy macbooks instead .
for the love of pete , do not prepare for your own future . buy macbooks instead .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "for", "the", "love", "of", "pete", ",", "do", "not", "prepare", "for", "your", "own", "future", ".", "buy", "macbooks", "instead", "." ]
usb is likely to survive but it 's also cutting down lending to fortify balances against downturn . all these likely survivors pmorgan chase , wells fargo , us bancorp and bank of america are getting into survival mode . they are not helping . reaping the benefits comes only after the dust has settled . it may take year or two . in the meantime , this mayhem may destroy lots of sound small and midsize manufacturing and retail business . big business with lots of debt like car companies go bankrupt also .
c05n70b
Economics
2,008
usb is likely to survive but it 's also cutting down lending to fortify balances against downturn . all these likely survivors pmorgan chase , wells fargo , us bancorp and bank of america are getting into survival mode . they are not helping . reaping the benefits comes only after the dust has settled . it may take year or two . in the meantime , this mayhem may destroy lots of sound small and midsize manufacturing and retail business . big business with lots of debt like car companies go bankrupt also .
@@usb## is likely to survive but it 's also cutting down lending to fortify balances against downturn . all these likely survivors @@pmorgan chase## , @@wells fargo## , @@us bancorp## and @@bank of america## are getting into survival mode . they are not helping . reaping the benefits comes only after the dust has settled . it may take year or two . in the meantime , this mayhem may destroy lots of sound small and midsize manufacturing and retail business . big business with lots of debt like car companies go bankrupt also .
usb is likely to survive but it 's also cutting down lending to fortify balances against downturn . all these likely survivors pmorgan chase , wells fargo , us bancorp and bank of america are getting into survival mode . they are not helping . reaping the benefits comes only after the dust has settled . it may take year or two . in the meantime , this mayhem may destroy lots of sound small and midsize manufacturing and retail business . big business with lots of debt like car companies go bankrupt also .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "usb", "is", "likely", "to", "survive", "but", "it", "'s", "also", "cutting", "down", "lending", "to", "fortify", "balances", "against", "downturn", ".", "all", "these", "likely", "survivors", "pmorgan", "chase", ",", "wells", "fargo", ",", "us", "bancorp", "and", "bank", "of", "america", "are", "getting", "into", "survival", "mode", ".", "they", "are", "not", "helping", ".", "reaping", "the", "benefits", "comes", "only", "after", "the", "dust", "has", "settled", ".", "it", "may", "take", "year", "or", "two", ".", "in", "the", "meantime", ",", "this", "mayhem", "may", "destroy", "lots", "of", "sound", "small", "and", "midsize", "manufacturing", "and", "retail", "business", ".", "big", "business", "with", "lots", "of", "debt", "like", "car", "companies", "go", "bankrupt", "also", "." ]
i ca n't even fathom the twisted logic that allows benefits unemployment , social security , etc . to be taxed in the first place . what gives if govt . needs the money just reduce the benefit by the amount they 'd be taxed and cut out all the bs , time , effort etc . of adding it onto the 1040 .
c05uvrw
Economics
2,008
i ca n't even fathom the twisted logic that allows benefits unemployment , social security , etc . to be taxed in the first place . what gives if govt . needs the money just reduce the benefit by the amount they 'd be taxed and cut out all the bs , time , effort etc . of adding it onto the 1040 .
i ca n't even fathom the twisted logic that allows benefits unemployment , social security , etc . to be taxed in the first place . what gives if govt . needs the money just reduce the benefit by the amount they 'd be taxed and cut out all the bs , time , effort etc . of adding it onto the 1040 .
i ca n't even fathom the twisted logic that allows benefits unemployment , social security , etc . to be taxed in the first place . what gives if govt . needs the money just reduce the benefit by the amount they 'd be taxed and cut out all the bs , time , effort etc . of adding it onto the 1040 .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "ca", "n't", "even", "fathom", "the", "twisted", "logic", "that", "allows", "benefits", "unemployment", ",", "social", "security", ",", "etc", ".", "to", "be", "taxed", "in", "the", "first", "place", ".", "what", "gives", "if", "govt", ".", "needs", "the", "money", "just", "reduce", "the", "benefit", "by", "the", "amount", "they", "'d", "be", "taxed", "and", "cut", "out", "all", "the", "bs", ",", "time", ",", "effort", "etc", ".", "of", "adding", "it", "onto", "the", "1040", "." ]
or if it contrasted corporate tax with personal income tax .
c0hn2cy
Economics
2,009
or if it contrasted corporate tax with personal income tax .
or if it contrasted corporate tax with personal income tax .
or if it contrasted corporate tax with personal income tax .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "or", "if", "it", "contrasted", "corporate", "tax", "with", "personal", "income", "tax", "." ]
what if we get people too confident and they buy too much stuff and get into too much debt again ? speaking of debt that 's still the problem . we have too much debt at all levels personal , business , governments . so you think the solution is to have people take on even more debt ?
c09zxs0
Economics
2,009
what if we get people too confident and they buy too much stuff and get into too much debt again ? speaking of debt that 's still the problem . we have too much debt at all levels personal , business , governments . so you think the solution is to have people take on even more debt ?
what if we get people too confident and they buy too much stuff and get into too much debt again ? speaking of debt that 's still the problem . we have too much debt at all levels personal , business , governments . so you think the solution is to have people take on even more debt ?
what if we get people too confident and they buy too much stuff and get into too much debt again ? speaking of debt that 's still the problem . we have too much debt at all levels personal , business , governments . so you think the solution is to have people take on even more debt ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "what", "if", "we", "get", "people", "too", "confident", "and", "they", "buy", "too", "much", "stuff", "and", "get", "into", "too", "much", "debt", "again", "?", "speaking", "of", "debt", "that", "'s", "still", "the", "problem", ".", "we", "have", "too", "much", "debt", "at", "all", "levels", "personal", ",", "business", ",", "governments", ".", "so", "you", "think", "the", "solution", "is", "to", "have", "people", "take", "on", "even", "more", "debt", "?" ]
that is , the situation is stable . share prices are never stable . market prices for stock can only exist when sellers and buyers do not agree on the value . that is why they change hands . you are asking for an absence of human action , an impossibility . when you toss in a bunch of extra shares , a lack of buyers for those extra fake shares does n't say anything about the number of buyers for legitimate shares , who , after all , have already bought all they wanted . extra shares are n't being tossed in '' . the number of shares outstanding has not increased . the number of shares outstanding is public information . so in order to actually complete a naked short sale , the shares have to be offered at a price lower than the value that the market has established for each of a given number of shares in xyz . right , but in order to complete a naked short sale , it is necessary that buyers do not abstain from buying the stock at any price but the original high '' price . this process does not affect the company 's fundamentals , and if buyers wo n't buy the stock at the high price , then the company is not worth the high price .
c085a8h
Economics
2,009
that is , the situation is stable . share prices are never stable . market prices for stock can only exist when @@sellers## and @@buyers## do not agree on the value . that is why they change hands . you are asking for an absence of human action , an impossibility . when you toss in a bunch of extra shares , a lack of @@buyers## for those extra fake shares does n't say anything about the number of @@buyers## for legitimate shares , who , after all , have already bought all they wanted . extra shares are n't being tossed in '' . the number of shares outstanding has not increased . the number of shares outstanding is public information . so in order to actually complete a naked short sale , the shares have to be offered at a price lower than the value that the market has established for each of a given number of shares in xyz . right , but in order to complete a naked short sale , it is necessary that @@buyers## do not abstain from buying the stock at any price but the original high '' price . this process does not affect the company 's fundamentals , and if @@buyers## wo n't buy the stock at the high price , then the company is not worth the high price .
that is , the situation is stable . share prices are never stable . market prices for stock can only exist when @@sellers## and @@buyers## do not agree on the value . that is why they change hands . you are asking for an absence of human action , an impossibility . when you toss in a bunch of extra shares , a lack of @@buyers## for those extra fake shares does n't say anything about the number of @@buyers## for legitimate shares , who , after all , have already bought all they wanted . extra shares are n't being tossed in '' . the number of shares outstanding has not increased . the number of shares outstanding is public information . so in order to actually complete a naked short sale , the shares have to be offered at a price lower than the value that the market has established for each of a given number of shares in xyz . right , but in order to complete a naked short sale , it is necessary that @@buyers## do not abstain from buying the stock at any price but the original high '' price . this process does not affect the company 's fundamentals , and if @@buyers## wo n't buy the stock at the high price , then the company is not worth the high price .
that is , the situation is stable . share prices are never stable . market prices for stock can only exist when @@sellers## and @@buyers## do not agree on the value . that is why they change hands . you are asking for an absence of human action , an impossibility . when you toss in a bunch of extra shares , a lack of @@buyers## for those extra fake shares does n't say anything about the number of @@buyers## for legitimate shares , who , after all , have already bought all they wanted . extra shares are n't being tossed in '' . the number of shares outstanding has not increased . the number of shares outstanding is public information . so in order to actually complete a naked short sale , the shares have to be offered at a price lower than the value that the market has established for each of a given number of shares in xyz . right , but in order to complete a naked short sale , it is necessary that @@buyers## do not abstain from buying the stock at any price but the original high '' price . this process does not affect the company 's fundamentals , and if @@buyers## wo n't buy the stock at the high price , then the company is not worth the high price .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "that", "is", ",", "the", "situation", "is", "stable", ".", "share", "prices", "are", "never", "stable", ".", "market", "prices", "for", "stock", "can", "only", "exist", "when", "sellers", "and", "buyers", "do", "not", "agree", "on", "the", "value", ".", "that", "is", "why", "they", "change", "hands", ".", "you", "are", "asking", "for", "an", "absence", "of", "human", "action", ",", "an", "impossibility", ".", "when", "you", "toss", "in", "a", "bunch", "of", "extra", "shares", ",", "a", "lack", "of", "buyers", "for", "those", "extra", "fake", "shares", "does", "n't", "say", "anything", "about", "the", "number", "of", "buyers", "for", "legitimate", "shares", ",", "who", ",", "after", "all", ",", "have", "already", "bought", "all", "they", "wanted", ".", "extra", "shares", "are", "n't", "being", "tossed", "in", "``", ".", "the", "number", "of", "shares", "outstanding", "has", "not", "increased", ".", "the", "number", "of", "shares", "outstanding", "is", "public", "information", ".", "so", "in", "order", "to", "actually", "complete", "a", "naked", "short", "sale", ",", "the", "shares", "have", "to", "be", "offered", "at", "a", "price", "lower", "than", "the", "value", "that", "the", "market", "has", "established", "for", "each", "of", "a", "given", "number", "of", "shares", "in", "xyz", ".", "right", ",", "but", "in", "order", "to", "complete", "a", "naked", "short", "sale", ",", "it", "is", "necessary", "that", "buyers", "do", "not", "abstain", "from", "buying", "the", "stock", "at", "any", "price", "but", "the", "original", "high", "``", "price", ".", "this", "process", "does", "not", "affect", "the", "company", "'s", "fundamentals", ",", "and", "if", "buyers", "wo", "n't", "buy", "the", "stock", "at", "the", "high", "price", ",", "then", "the", "company", "is", "not", "worth", "the", "high", "price", "." ]
unless you actually value having space , being able to do what you want with your home , not having a neighbor living on the other side of your wall . and shockingly some people actually enjoy gardening and doing yard work ! there are also tax benefits to buying a house , like being able to deduct the interest expense . no worries though . keep living in someone else 's property . i 'm sure they 're really upset about it .
c07nka5
Economics
2,009
unless you actually value having space , being able to do what you want with your home , not having a neighbor living on the other side of your wall . and shockingly some people actually enjoy gardening and doing yard work ! there are also tax benefits to buying a house , like being able to deduct the interest expense . no worries though . keep living in someone else 's property . i 'm sure they 're really upset about it .
unless you actually value having space , being able to do what you want with your home , not having a neighbor living on the other side of your wall . and shockingly some people actually enjoy gardening and doing yard work ! there are also tax benefits to buying a house , like being able to deduct the interest expense . no worries though . keep living in someone else 's property . i 'm sure they 're really upset about it .
unless you actually value having space , being able to do what you want with your home , not having a neighbor living on the other side of your wall . and shockingly some people actually enjoy gardening and doing yard work ! there are also tax benefits to buying a house , like being able to deduct the interest expense . no worries though . keep living in someone else 's property . i 'm sure they 're really upset about it .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "unless", "you", "actually", "value", "having", "space", ",", "being", "able", "to", "do", "what", "you", "want", "with", "your", "home", ",", "not", "having", "a", "neighbor", "living", "on", "the", "other", "side", "of", "your", "wall", ".", "and", "shockingly", "some", "people", "actually", "enjoy", "gardening", "and", "doing", "yard", "work", "!", "there", "are", "also", "tax", "benefits", "to", "buying", "a", "house", ",", "like", "being", "able", "to", "deduct", "the", "interest", "expense", ".", "no", "worries", "though", ".", "keep", "living", "in", "someone", "else", "'s", "property", ".", "i", "'m", "sure", "they", "'re", "really", "upset", "about", "it", "." ]
actually fat people die sooner so they are less of a burden to the public option . now where did i put that hammer and sickle ...
c0d3kcn
Economics
2,009
actually @@fat people## die sooner so they are less of a burden to the public option . now where did i put that hammer and sickle ...
actually @@fat people## die sooner so they are less of a burden to the public option . now where did i put that hammer and sickle ...
actually @@fat people## die sooner so they are less of a burden to the public option . now where did i put that hammer and sickle ...
[ "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "actually", "fat", "people", "die", "sooner", "so", "they", "are", "less", "of", "a", "burden", "to", "the", "public", "option", ".", "now", "where", "did", "i", "put", "that", "hammer", "and", "sickle", "..." ]
and everyone continues to leave the market because one producer operates at a loss to corner it . ... failure to model the dynamic conditions of the market much ?
c0brd6d
Economics
2,009
and everyone continues to leave the market because one producer operates at a loss to corner it . ... failure to model the dynamic conditions of the market much ?
and everyone continues to leave the market because one producer operates at a loss to corner it . ... failure to model the dynamic conditions of the market much ?
and everyone continues to leave the market because one producer operates at a loss to corner it . ... failure to model the dynamic conditions of the market much ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "and", "everyone", "continues", "to", "leave", "the", "market", "because", "one", "producer", "operates", "at", "a", "loss", "to", "corner", "it", ".", "...", "failure", "to", "model", "the", "dynamic", "conditions", "of", "the", "market", "much", "?" ]
the difference between a ponzi scheme and a pyramid scheme eludes me .
c0dumli
Economics
2,009
the difference between a ponzi scheme and a pyramid scheme eludes me .
the difference between a ponzi scheme and a pyramid scheme eludes me .
the difference between a ponzi scheme and a pyramid scheme eludes me .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "difference", "between", "a", "ponzi", "scheme", "and", "a", "pyramid", "scheme", "eludes", "me", "." ]
i stared suze orman once . was n't worth it .
c0g8su1
Economics
2,009
i stared suze orman once . was n't worth it .
i stared suze orman once . was n't worth it .
i stared suze orman once . was n't worth it .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "stared", "suze", "orman", "once", ".", "was", "n't", "worth", "it", "." ]
yes , fire him after 3 months on the job . that makes perfect sense .
c083v7a
Economics
2,009
yes , fire him after 3 months on the job . that makes perfect sense .
yes , fire him after 3 months on the job . that makes perfect sense .
yes , fire him after 3 months on the job . that makes perfect sense .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "yes", ",", "fire", "him", "after", "3", "months", "on", "the", "job", ".", "that", "makes", "perfect", "sense", "." ]
that means you 're one of the least effective targets for stimulus anyway excellent point , really crystallizes the driving idea behind your comments .
c07kfo2
Economics
2,009
that means you 're one of the least effective targets for stimulus anyway excellent point , really crystallizes the driving idea behind your comments .
that means you 're one of the least effective targets for stimulus anyway excellent point , really crystallizes the driving idea behind your comments .
that means you 're one of the least effective targets for stimulus anyway excellent point , really crystallizes the driving idea behind your comments .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "that", "means", "you", "'re", "one", "of", "the", "least", "effective", "targets", "for", "stimulus", "anyway", "excellent", "point", ",", "really", "crystallizes", "the", "driving", "idea", "behind", "your", "comments", "." ]
this guy 's blog is really good . he 's a doom and gloom buy , but pretty good info ... URL
c0bc8r5
Economics
2,009
this guy 's blog is really good . he 's a doom and gloom buy , but pretty good info ... URL
this guy 's blog is really good . he 's a doom and gloom buy , but pretty good info ... URL
this guy 's blog is really good . he 's a doom and gloom buy , but pretty good info ... URL
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "this", "guy", "'s", "blog", "is", "really", "good", ".", "he", "'s", "a", "doom", "and", "gloom", "buy", ",", "but", "pretty", "good", "info", "...", "URL" ]
'' show me a shortage of something and i 'll show you something that is n't priced by a free market . '' still a shortage .
c0ey926
Economics
2,009
'' show me a shortage of something and i 'll show you something that is n't priced by a free market . '' still a shortage .
' show me a shortage of something and i 'll show you something that is n't priced by a free market . '' still a shortage .
'' show me a shortage of something and i 'll show you something that is n't priced by a free market . '' still a shortage .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "''", "show", "me", "a", "shortage", "of", "something", "and", "i", "'ll", "show", "you", "something", "that", "is", "n't", "priced", "by", "a", "free", "market", ".", "``", "still", "a", "shortage", "." ]
gold is only a hedge against inflation because investors believe it is . this view will end when gold prices collapse as a result of the current gold bubble . there is nothing that separates gold from any other commodity ... other than the receding history of gold as a unit of money .
c07wq3o
Economics
2,009
gold is only a hedge against inflation because @@investors## believe it is . this view will end when gold prices collapse as a result of the current gold bubble . there is nothing that separates gold from any other commodity ... other than the receding history of gold as a unit of money .
gold is only a hedge against inflation because @@investors## believe it is . this view will end when gold prices collapse as a result of the current gold bubble . there is nothing that separates gold from any other commodity ... other than the receding history of gold as a unit of money .
gold is only a hedge against inflation because @@investors## believe it is . this view will end when gold prices collapse as a result of the current gold bubble . there is nothing that separates gold from any other commodity ... other than the receding history of gold as a unit of money .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "gold", "is", "only", "a", "hedge", "against", "inflation", "because", "investors", "believe", "it", "is", ".", "this", "view", "will", "end", "when", "gold", "prices", "collapse", "as", "a", "result", "of", "the", "current", "gold", "bubble", ".", "there", "is", "nothing", "that", "separates", "gold", "from", "any", "other", "commodity", "...", "other", "than", "the", "receding", "history", "of", "gold", "as", "a", "unit", "of", "money", "." ]
i personally wish i would 've been beat for sucking in school , would 've made my life a lot fucking easier in the long run . that 's probably what it would 've taken to make me perform . although , even some attention would 've helped . my single mom did not give a fuck . dad would have , but not around enough .
c0de6zo
Economics
2,009
i personally wish i would 've been beat for sucking in school , would 've made my life a lot fucking easier in the long run . that 's probably what it would 've taken to make me perform . although , even some attention would 've helped . my single mom did not give a fuck . dad would have , but not around enough .
i personally wish i would 've been beat for sucking in school , would 've made my life a lot fucking easier in the long run . that 's probably what it would 've taken to make me perform . although , even some attention would 've helped . my single mom did not give a fuck . dad would have , but not around enough .
i personally wish i would 've been beat for sucking in school , would 've made my life a lot fucking easier in the long run . that 's probably what it would 've taken to make me perform . although , even some attention would 've helped . my single mom did not give a fuck . dad would have , but not around enough .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "personally", "wish", "i", "would", "'ve", "been", "beat", "for", "sucking", "in", "school", ",", "would", "'ve", "made", "my", "life", "a", "lot", "fucking", "easier", "in", "the", "long", "run", ".", "that", "'s", "probably", "what", "it", "would", "'ve", "taken", "to", "make", "me", "perform", ".", "although", ",", "even", "some", "attention", "would", "'ve", "helped", ".", "my", "single", "mom", "did", "not", "give", "a", "fuck", ".", "dad", "would", "have", ",", "but", "not", "around", "enough", "." ]
hoarding money , gold or fiat , kills investment .
c0cqm4z
Economics
2,009
hoarding money , gold or fiat , kills investment .
hoarding money , gold or fiat , kills investment .
hoarding money , gold or fiat , kills investment .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "hoarding", "money", ",", "gold", "or", "fiat", ",", "kills", "investment", "." ]
oh please , save us ! tell us what to do , oh great one !
c07t12y
Economics
2,009
oh please , save us ! tell us what to do , oh great one !
oh please , save us ! tell us what to do , oh great one !
oh please , save us ! tell us what to do , oh great one !
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "oh", "please", ",", "save", "us", "!", "tell", "us", "what", "to", "do", ",", "oh", "great", "one", "!" ]
well , let s see . you could use the infrastructure that society provides to make and sell in good faith a good or service that other people happen to want . if you re talented and lucky , this might get you rich . from here , maybe you can force out all your competitors . then you could get really rich and stay that way . or , you could collude with your competitors so that all of you get richer together . or , if you don t have a monopoly or a cartel , you could mislead people into believing your product or service is something that it is not , in order to make it appear more valuable than it really is . you ll stand a better chance of getting rich this way . or , you could pay powerful people to give your business an edge over your competitors and your customers . this can get you richer , but you generally have to be rich to begin with . or , you could be born into a rich family . that way you can either kickback and enjoy what your ancestors have given you , or even better , use some of your inheritance to buy the prestige and social connections that can make you even richer . how does one get poor ?
c0euad1
Economics
2,009
well , let s see . you could use the infrastructure that society provides to make and sell in good faith a good or service that other people happen to want . if you re talented and lucky , this might get you rich . from here , maybe you can force out all your competitors . then you could get really rich and stay that way . or , you could collude with your competitors so that all of you get richer together . or , if you don t have a monopoly or a cartel , you could mislead people into believing your product or service is something that it is not , in order to make it appear more valuable than it really is . you ll stand a better chance of getting rich this way . or , you could pay powerful people to give your business an edge over your competitors and your customers . this can get you richer , but you generally have to be rich to begin with . or , you could be born into a rich family . that way you can either kickback and enjoy what your ancestors have given you , or even better , use some of your inheritance to buy the prestige and social connections that can make you even richer . how does one get poor ?
well , let s see . you could use the infrastructure that society provides to make and sell in good faith a good or service that other people happen to want . if you re talented and lucky , this might get you rich . from here , maybe you can force out all your @@competitors## . then you could get really rich and stay that way . or , you could collude with your @@competitors## so that all of you get richer together . or , if you don t have a monopoly or a cartel , you could mislead people into believing your product or service is something that it is not , in order to make it appear more valuable than it really is . you ll stand a better chance of getting rich this way . or , you could pay @@powerful people## to give your business an edge over your @@competitors## and your customers . this can get you richer , but you generally have to be rich to begin with . or , you could be born into a @@rich family## . that way you can either kickback and enjoy what your ancestors have given you , or even better , use some of your inheritance to buy the prestige and social connections that can make you even richer . how does one get poor ?
well , let s see . you could use the infrastructure that society provides to make and sell in good faith a good or service that other people happen to want . if you re talented and lucky , this might get you rich . from here , maybe you can force out all your competitors . then you could get really rich and stay that way . or , you could collude with your competitors so that all of you get richer together . or , if you don t have a monopoly or a cartel , you could mislead people into believing your product or service is something that it is not , in order to make it appear more valuable than it really is . you ll stand a better chance of getting rich this way . or , you could pay @@powerful people## to give your business an edge over your competitors and your customers . this can get you richer , but you generally have to be rich to begin with . or , you could be born into a @@rich family## . that way you can either kickback and enjoy what your ancestors have given you , or even better , use some of your inheritance to buy the prestige and social connections that can make you even richer . how does one get poor ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "well", ",", "let", "s", "see", ".", "you", "could", "use", "the", "infrastructure", "that", "society", "provides", "to", "make", "and", "sell", "in", "good", "faith", "a", "good", "or", "service", "that", "other", "people", "happen", "to", "want", ".", "if", "you", "re", "talented", "and", "lucky", ",", "this", "might", "get", "you", "rich", ".", "from", "here", ",", "maybe", "you", "can", "force", "out", "all", "your", "competitors", ".", "then", "you", "could", "get", "really", "rich", "and", "stay", "that", "way", ".", "or", ",", "you", "could", "collude", "with", "your", "competitors", "so", "that", "all", "of", "you", "get", "richer", "together", ".", "or", ",", "if", "you", "don", "t", "have", "a", "monopoly", "or", "a", "cartel", ",", "you", "could", "mislead", "people", "into", "believing", "your", "product", "or", "service", "is", "something", "that", "it", "is", "not", ",", "in", "order", "to", "make", "it", "appear", "more", "valuable", "than", "it", "really", "is", ".", "you", "ll", "stand", "a", "better", "chance", "of", "getting", "rich", "this", "way", ".", "or", ",", "you", "could", "pay", "powerful", "people", "to", "give", "your", "business", "an", "edge", "over", "your", "competitors", "and", "your", "customers", ".", "this", "can", "get", "you", "richer", ",", "but", "you", "generally", "have", "to", "be", "rich", "to", "begin", "with", ".", "or", ",", "you", "could", "be", "born", "into", "a", "rich", "family", ".", "that", "way", "you", "can", "either", "kickback", "and", "enjoy", "what", "your", "ancestors", "have", "given", "you", ",", "or", "even", "better", ",", "use", "some", "of", "your", "inheritance", "to", "buy", "the", "prestige", "and", "social", "connections", "that", "can", "make", "you", "even", "richer", ".", "how", "does", "one", "get", "poor", "?" ]
but economics is cool , and one of the great unsolved mysteries of our time . economics is about the allocation of scarce resources . if we assume human beings are rational and make rational decision , then economics is easily understood . the problem is that human beings are highly irrational . and they often make irrational decisions . which is why economists can not predict the future . if economists could predict the future , they would n't be working for a bank telling you what the future holds . they 'd be sitting at home , enjoying their nice comfy life .
c07401b
Economics
2,009
but economics is cool , and one of the great unsolved mysteries of our time . economics is about the allocation of scarce resources . if we assume human beings are rational and make rational decision , then economics is easily understood . the problem is that human beings are highly irrational . and they often make irrational decisions . which is why economists can not predict the future . if economists could predict the future , they would n't be working for a bank telling you what the future holds . they 'd be sitting at home , enjoying their nice comfy life .
but economics is cool , and one of the great unsolved mysteries of our time . economics is about the allocation of scarce resources . if we assume human beings are rational and make rational decision , then economics is easily understood . the problem is that human beings are highly irrational . and they often make irrational decisions . which is why @@economists## can not predict the future . if @@economists## could predict the future , they would n't be working for a bank telling you what the future holds . they 'd be sitting at home , enjoying their nice comfy life .
but economics is cool , and one of the great unsolved mysteries of our time . economics is about the allocation of scarce resources . if we assume human beings are rational and make rational decision , then economics is easily understood . the problem is that human beings are highly irrational . and they often make irrational decisions . which is why @@economists## can not predict the future . if @@economists## could predict the future , they would n't be working for a bank telling you what the future holds . they 'd be sitting at home , enjoying their nice comfy life .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "but", "economics", "is", "cool", ",", "and", "one", "of", "the", "great", "unsolved", "mysteries", "of", "our", "time", ".", "economics", "is", "about", "the", "allocation", "of", "scarce", "resources", ".", "if", "we", "assume", "human", "beings", "are", "rational", "and", "make", "rational", "decision", ",", "then", "economics", "is", "easily", "understood", ".", "the", "problem", "is", "that", "human", "beings", "are", "highly", "irrational", ".", "and", "they", "often", "make", "irrational", "decisions", ".", "which", "is", "why", "economists", "can", "not", "predict", "the", "future", ".", "if", "economists", "could", "predict", "the", "future", ",", "they", "would", "n't", "be", "working", "for", "a", "bank", "telling", "you", "what", "the", "future", "holds", ".", "they", "'d", "be", "sitting", "at", "home", ",", "enjoying", "their", "nice", "comfy", "life", "." ]
or you could go to bugmenot.com edit nice of you ! sorry if i was being a jackass ...
c0cc16i
Economics
2,009
or you could go to bugmenot.com edit nice of you ! sorry if i was being a jackass ...
or you could go to bugmenot.com edit nice of you ! sorry if i was being a jackass ...
or you could go to bugmenot.com edit nice of you ! sorry if i was being a jackass ...
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "or", "you", "could", "go", "to", "bugmenot.com", "edit", "nice", "of", "you", "!", "sorry", "if", "i", "was", "being", "a", "jackass", "..." ]
clapclapclap i came in this reply area ready to fight it out with the keynsian hoard that is taken over our government but it looks like you already did . much better than i could as well ! thank you private freedom
c07mn7k
Economics
2,009
clapclapclap i came in this reply area ready to fight it out with the @@keynsian hoard that is taken over our government## but it looks like you already did . much better than i could as well ! thank you private freedom
clapclapclap i came in this reply area ready to fight it out with the @@keynsian hoard## that is taken over our government but it looks like you already did . much better than i could as well ! thank you private freedom
clapclapclap i came in this reply area ready to fight it out with the @@keynsian hoard that is taken over our government## but it looks like you already did . much better than i could as well ! thank you private freedom
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "clapclapclap", "i", "came", "in", "this", "reply", "area", "ready", "to", "fight", "it", "out", "with", "the", "keynsian", "hoard", "that", "is", "taken", "over", "our", "government", "but", "it", "looks", "like", "you", "already", "did", ".", "much", "better", "than", "i", "could", "as", "well", "!", "thank", "you", "private", "freedom" ]
my point was that it does n't matter if they are importing refined oil . people here in alberta are always complaining that we are being ripped off because the us is selling our own oil back to us , but the amount we consume is a drop in the bucket compared to the amount we export to them , so we 're making a huge profit still .
c0dxt2e
Economics
2,009
my point was that it does n't matter if they are importing refined oil . @@people here in alberta## are always complaining that we are being ripped off because @@the us## is selling our own oil back to us , but the amount we consume is a drop in the bucket compared to the amount we export to them , so we 're making a huge profit still .
my point was that it does n't matter if they are importing refined oil . people here in alberta are always complaining that we are being ripped off because @@the us## is selling our own oil back to us , but the amount we consume is a drop in the bucket compared to the amount we export to them , so we 're making a huge profit still .
my point was that it does n't matter if they are importing refined oil . @@people here in alberta## are always complaining that we are being ripped off because @@the us## is selling our own oil back to us , but the amount we consume is a drop in the bucket compared to the amount we export to them , so we 're making a huge profit still .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "my", "point", "was", "that", "it", "does", "n't", "matter", "if", "they", "are", "importing", "refined", "oil", ".", "people", "here", "in", "alberta", "are", "always", "complaining", "that", "we", "are", "being", "ripped", "off", "because", "the", "us", "is", "selling", "our", "own", "oil", "back", "to", "us", ",", "but", "the", "amount", "we", "consume", "is", "a", "drop", "in", "the", "bucket", "compared", "to", "the", "amount", "we", "export", "to", "them", ",", "so", "we", "'re", "making", "a", "huge", "profit", "still", "." ]
why do libertarians seem to think we should play fast and loose with what money we are using for stimulus ? what evidence is there that continuing global trade in this case will result in our economy returning to normal ? there are plenty of third world countries that trade with the rest of the world , a quite frankly things do n't look much better for them from it . the stimulus money should be spent on american products in order to stimulate the american economy . sure , if we buy ultracheap stuff from china we 'll have saved a bit of money , but then we 'll have only stimulated china 's economy and not our own . you libertarians need to realize , the free market is not some benevolent god that will always smile upon america as long as america continues to slash regulations and restrictions . life under a truly free market would be a picture of hell for everyone but the richest few .
c07gv65
Economics
2,009
why do @@libertarians## seem to think we should play fast and loose with what money we are using for stimulus ? what evidence is there that continuing global trade in this case will result in our economy returning to normal ? there are plenty of @@third world countries## that trade with the rest of the world , a quite frankly things do n't look much better for them from it . the stimulus money should be spent on american products in order to stimulate the american economy . sure , if we buy ultracheap stuff from china we 'll have saved a bit of money , but then we 'll have only stimulated china 's economy and not our own . you @@libertarians## need to realize , the free market is not some benevolent god that will always smile upon america as long as america continues to slash regulations and restrictions . life under a truly free market would be a picture of hell for everyone but @@the richest few## .
why do @@libertarians## seem to think we should play fast and loose with what money we are using for stimulus ? what evidence is there that continuing global trade in this case will result in our economy returning to normal ? there are plenty of @@third world countries## that trade with the rest of the world , a quite frankly things do n't look much better for them from it . the stimulus money should be spent on american products in order to stimulate the american economy . sure , if we buy ultracheap stuff from china we 'll have saved a bit of money , but then we 'll have only stimulated @@china 's## economy and not our own . you @@libertarians## need to realize , the free market is not some benevolent god that will always smile upon @@america## as long as @@america## continues to slash regulations and restrictions . life under a truly free market would be a picture of hell for everyone but the richest few .
why do @@libertarians## seem to think we should play fast and loose with what money we are using for stimulus ? what evidence is there that continuing global trade in this case will result in our economy returning to normal ? there are plenty of @@third world countries## that trade with the rest of the world , a quite frankly things do n't look much better for them from it . the stimulus money should be spent on american products in order to stimulate the american economy . sure , if we buy ultracheap stuff from china we 'll have saved a bit of money , but then we 'll have only stimulated china 's economy and not our own . you @@libertarians## need to realize , the free market is not some benevolent god that will always smile upon america as long as america continues to slash regulations and restrictions . life under a truly free market would be a picture of hell for everyone but @@the richest few## .
[ "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0 ]
[ "why", "do", "libertarians", "seem", "to", "think", "we", "should", "play", "fast", "and", "loose", "with", "what", "money", "we", "are", "using", "for", "stimulus", "?", "what", "evidence", "is", "there", "that", "continuing", "global", "trade", "in", "this", "case", "will", "result", "in", "our", "economy", "returning", "to", "normal", "?", "there", "are", "plenty", "of", "third", "world", "countries", "that", "trade", "with", "the", "rest", "of", "the", "world", ",", "a", "quite", "frankly", "things", "do", "n't", "look", "much", "better", "for", "them", "from", "it", ".", "the", "stimulus", "money", "should", "be", "spent", "on", "american", "products", "in", "order", "to", "stimulate", "the", "american", "economy", ".", "sure", ",", "if", "we", "buy", "ultracheap", "stuff", "from", "china", "we", "'ll", "have", "saved", "a", "bit", "of", "money", ",", "but", "then", "we", "'ll", "have", "only", "stimulated", "china", "'s", "economy", "and", "not", "our", "own", ".", "you", "libertarians", "need", "to", "realize", ",", "the", "free", "market", "is", "not", "some", "benevolent", "god", "that", "will", "always", "smile", "upon", "america", "as", "long", "as", "america", "continues", "to", "slash", "regulations", "and", "restrictions", ".", "life", "under", "a", "truly", "free", "market", "would", "be", "a", "picture", "of", "hell", "for", "everyone", "but", "the", "richest", "few", "." ]
this is only a technical analysis of the trends . you have to look at the fundamentals to know that gold is the only safe haven to the mass inflation that is occurring because of government intervention in the economy . when the effects of inflation come , commodities will be the only ones that will hold on to their value .
c07vb84
Economics
2,009
this is only a technical analysis of the trends . you have to look at the fundamentals to know that gold is the only safe haven to the mass inflation that is occurring because of government intervention in the economy . when the effects of inflation come , commodities will be the only ones that will hold on to their value .
this is only a technical analysis of the trends . you have to look at the fundamentals to know that gold is the only safe haven to the mass inflation that is occurring because of government intervention in the economy . when the effects of inflation come , commodities will be the only ones that will hold on to their value .
this is only a technical analysis of the trends . you have to look at the fundamentals to know that gold is the only safe haven to the mass inflation that is occurring because of government intervention in the economy . when the effects of inflation come , commodities will be the only ones that will hold on to their value .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "this", "is", "only", "a", "technical", "analysis", "of", "the", "trends", ".", "you", "have", "to", "look", "at", "the", "fundamentals", "to", "know", "that", "gold", "is", "the", "only", "safe", "haven", "to", "the", "mass", "inflation", "that", "is", "occurring", "because", "of", "government", "intervention", "in", "the", "economy", ".", "when", "the", "effects", "of", "inflation", "come", ",", "commodities", "will", "be", "the", "only", "ones", "that", "will", "hold", "on", "to", "their", "value", "." ]
achieve better results people live longer . and costs per person should be lower through scale of a larger population .
c08y1i1
Economics
2,009
achieve better results people live longer . and costs per person should be lower through scale of a larger population .
achieve better results people live longer . and costs per person should be lower through scale of a larger population .
achieve better results people live longer . and costs per person should be lower through scale of a larger population .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "achieve", "better", "results", "people", "live", "longer", ".", "and", "costs", "per", "person", "should", "be", "lower", "through", "scale", "of", "a", "larger", "population", "." ]
this would only work if the prison were by far the most significant factor effecting the rate of repeat offenders . i doubt that this is the case . even if something else , location for example , had just a moderate influence on the rate of repeat offenders , this nice sounding idea would likely degrade into a vicious cycle that ended up hurting facilities whose prisoners were already at a disadvantage . say the prisoners in prison x were more likely to be locked up again due to cultural factors . prison x may have better staff and facilities than prison y , but if prison y is in a better area , x may still come out behind . this could have the effect of discouraging facilities that were already at a disadvantage , and rewarding facilities simply for being in a better area . adding postincarceration employment rates complicates things even further . it 's sounds like a good idea at first but i do n't think it would ever work .
c0g5ti5
Economics
2,009
this would only work if the prison were by far the most significant factor effecting the rate of repeat offenders . i doubt that this is the case . even if something else , location for example , had just a moderate influence on the rate of repeat offenders , this nice sounding idea would likely degrade into a vicious cycle that ended up hurting facilities whose @@prisoners## were already at a disadvantage . say the @@prisoners## in prison x were more likely to be locked up again due to cultural factors . prison x may have better staff and facilities than prison y , but if prison y is in a better area , x may still come out behind . this could have the effect of discouraging facilities that were already at a disadvantage , and rewarding facilities simply for being in a better area . adding postincarceration employment rates complicates things even further . it 's sounds like a good idea at first but i do n't think it would ever work .
this would only work if the prison were by far the most significant factor effecting the rate of @@repeat offenders## . i doubt that this is the case . even if something else , location for example , had just a moderate influence on the rate of @@repeat offenders## , this nice sounding idea would likely degrade into a vicious cycle that ended up hurting facilities whose @@prisoners## were already at a disadvantage . say the @@prisoners## in prison x were more likely to be locked up again due to cultural factors . prison x may have better staff and facilities than prison y , but if prison y is in a better area , x may still come out behind . this could have the effect of discouraging facilities that were already at a disadvantage , and rewarding facilities simply for being in a better area . adding postincarceration employment rates complicates things even further . it 's sounds like a good idea at first but i do n't think it would ever work .
this would only work if the prison were by far the most significant factor effecting the rate of @@repeat offenders## . i doubt that this is the case . even if something else , location for example , had just a moderate influence on the rate of @@repeat offenders## , this nice sounding idea would likely degrade into a vicious cycle that ended up hurting facilities whose @@prisoners## were already at a disadvantage . say the @@prisoners## in prison x were more likely to be locked up again due to cultural factors . prison x may have better staff and facilities than prison y , but if prison y is in a better area , x may still come out behind . this could have the effect of discouraging facilities that were already at a disadvantage , and rewarding facilities simply for being in a better area . adding postincarceration employment rates complicates things even further . it 's sounds like a good idea at first but i do n't think it would ever work .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "this", "would", "only", "work", "if", "the", "prison", "were", "by", "far", "the", "most", "significant", "factor", "effecting", "the", "rate", "of", "repeat", "offenders", ".", "i", "doubt", "that", "this", "is", "the", "case", ".", "even", "if", "something", "else", ",", "location", "for", "example", ",", "had", "just", "a", "moderate", "influence", "on", "the", "rate", "of", "repeat", "offenders", ",", "this", "nice", "sounding", "idea", "would", "likely", "degrade", "into", "a", "vicious", "cycle", "that", "ended", "up", "hurting", "facilities", "whose", "prisoners", "were", "already", "at", "a", "disadvantage", ".", "say", "the", "prisoners", "in", "prison", "x", "were", "more", "likely", "to", "be", "locked", "up", "again", "due", "to", "cultural", "factors", ".", "prison", "x", "may", "have", "better", "staff", "and", "facilities", "than", "prison", "y", ",", "but", "if", "prison", "y", "is", "in", "a", "better", "area", ",", "x", "may", "still", "come", "out", "behind", ".", "this", "could", "have", "the", "effect", "of", "discouraging", "facilities", "that", "were", "already", "at", "a", "disadvantage", ",", "and", "rewarding", "facilities", "simply", "for", "being", "in", "a", "better", "area", ".", "adding", "postincarceration", "employment", "rates", "complicates", "things", "even", "further", ".", "it", "'s", "sounds", "like", "a", "good", "idea", "at", "first", "but", "i", "do", "n't", "think", "it", "would", "ever", "work", "." ]
how do you expect people to make sound economic decisions in that type of environment ? people will always trade when both people think they will benefit . there is absolutely no worry about a spiral '' . it is easily seen to be false when performing analysis from a methodological individualist point of view . see my spiel on convergence in deflation scenarios toward the bottom of this page .
c0dse5o
Economics
2,009
how do you expect people to make sound economic decisions in that type of environment ? people will always trade when both people think they will benefit . there is absolutely no worry about a spiral '' . it is easily seen to be false when performing analysis from a methodological individualist point of view . see my spiel on convergence in deflation scenarios toward the bottom of this page .
how do you expect people to make sound economic decisions in that type of environment ? people will always trade when both people think they will benefit . there is absolutely no worry about a spiral '' . it is easily seen to be false when performing analysis from a methodological individualist point of view . see my spiel on convergence in deflation scenarios toward the bottom of this page .
how do you expect people to make sound economic decisions in that type of environment ? people will always trade when both people think they will benefit . there is absolutely no worry about a spiral '' . it is easily seen to be false when performing analysis from a methodological individualist point of view . see my spiel on convergence in deflation scenarios toward the bottom of this page .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "how", "do", "you", "expect", "people", "to", "make", "sound", "economic", "decisions", "in", "that", "type", "of", "environment", "?", "people", "will", "always", "trade", "when", "both", "people", "think", "they", "will", "benefit", ".", "there", "is", "absolutely", "no", "worry", "about", "a", "spiral", "``", ".", "it", "is", "easily", "seen", "to", "be", "false", "when", "performing", "analysis", "from", "a", "methodological", "individualist", "point", "of", "view", ".", "see", "my", "spiel", "on", "convergence", "in", "deflation", "scenarios", "toward", "the", "bottom", "of", "this", "page", "." ]
then they 'd be stuck with dealing with facts instead of just political pressure . what is shocking is that most americans do n't even know that their representatives do n't read the bills they vote for .
c0bov1s
Economics
2,009
then they 'd be stuck with dealing with facts instead of just political pressure . what is shocking is that most @@americans## do n't even know that their representatives do n't read the bills they vote for .
then they 'd be stuck with dealing with facts instead of just political pressure . what is shocking is that most @@americans## do n't even know that their @@representatives## do n't read the bills they vote for .
then they 'd be stuck with dealing with facts instead of just political pressure . what is shocking is that most @@americans## do n't even know that their @@representatives## do n't read the bills they vote for .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "then", "they", "'d", "be", "stuck", "with", "dealing", "with", "facts", "instead", "of", "just", "political", "pressure", ".", "what", "is", "shocking", "is", "that", "most", "americans", "do", "n't", "even", "know", "that", "their", "representatives", "do", "n't", "read", "the", "bills", "they", "vote", "for", "." ]
whoa ... what 's up with vermont ?
c0caext
Economics
2,009
whoa ... what 's up with vermont ?
whoa ... what 's up with vermont ?
whoa ... what 's up with vermont ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "whoa", "...", "what", "'s", "up", "with", "vermont", "?" ]
i was home schooled , and i 've somehow never even heard of the standardized tests clep , ap , dsstdantes mentioned in this article . i wonder if this is the case with others , as well ?
c0c9pj5
Economics
2,009
i was home schooled , and i 've somehow never even heard of the standardized tests clep , ap , dsstdantes mentioned in this article . i wonder if this is the case with others , as well ?
i was home schooled , and i 've somehow never even heard of the standardized tests clep , ap , dsstdantes mentioned in this article . i wonder if this is the case with others , as well ?
i was home schooled , and i 've somehow never even heard of the standardized tests clep , ap , dsstdantes mentioned in this article . i wonder if this is the case with others , as well ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "was", "home", "schooled", ",", "and", "i", "'ve", "somehow", "never", "even", "heard", "of", "the", "standardized", "tests", "clep", ",", "ap", ",", "dsstdantes", "mentioned", "in", "this", "article", ".", "i", "wonder", "if", "this", "is", "the", "case", "with", "others", ",", "as", "well", "?" ]
no , people should be payed by the supply of brilliant minds . not everyone can be a doctor , thus they should be paid accordingly .
c0d1fnh
Economics
2,009
no , people should be payed by the supply of brilliant minds . not everyone can be a doctor , thus they should be paid accordingly .
no , people should be payed by the supply of brilliant minds . not everyone can be a doctor , thus they should be paid accordingly .
no , people should be payed by the supply of brilliant minds . not everyone can be a doctor , thus they should be paid accordingly .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "no", ",", "people", "should", "be", "payed", "by", "the", "supply", "of", "brilliant", "minds", ".", "not", "everyone", "can", "be", "a", "doctor", ",", "thus", "they", "should", "be", "paid", "accordingly", "." ]
beginning of the end ? or the end of the beginning ?
c0agjl8
Economics
2,009
beginning of the end ? or the end of the beginning ?
beginning of the end ? or the end of the beginning ?
beginning of the end ? or the end of the beginning ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "beginning", "of", "the", "end", "?", "or", "the", "end", "of", "the", "beginning", "?" ]
i 'm looking at the 18 45,000 line , and if that 's what he was going for , he could 've done a better job .
c0bp30j
Economics
2,009
i 'm looking at the 18 45,000 line , and if that 's what he was going for , he could 've done a better job .
i 'm looking at the 18 45,000 line , and if that 's what he was going for , he could 've done a better job .
i 'm looking at the 18 45,000 line , and if that 's what he was going for , he could 've done a better job .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "'m", "looking", "at", "the", "18", "45,000", "line", ",", "and", "if", "that", "'s", "what", "he", "was", "going", "for", ",", "he", "could", "'ve", "done", "a", "better", "job", "." ]
because the monetary base has increased substantially . yes , i know . but that does n't mean anything if it and additional bank credit does n't actually make its way into the economy . look at this chart URL . the money supply was soaring during the great depression , too . are you going to argue that the great depresion was hyperinflationary ? if you use a soaring money supply as the sole criterion , then you have to . similarly , look at japan . the boj printed like crazy and it did n't matter people just did n't borrow . and surprise , surprise government spending did n't do anything except astronomically increase government debt . once that money leaves the banking system , it should collapse the dollar . of course . but if the money does n't leave the banking system , mish is right . and his point is it did n't happen in the great depression , it did n't happen in japan , and there 's no reason for it to happen here today . in fact , he says it ca n't happen yet banks are too capital impaired to lend and consumers are too debtridden to borrow . and we have n't even seen the full storm yet of sivs , credit card debt , student loan debt , auto debts , commercial real estate debt , and retiring , bankrupt boomers . much of this debt ca n't be serviced especially with falling wages and rising unemployment and what ca n't be paid back will be defaulted on , which will further cause bank balance sheets to contract and impair lending . plust you have to factor in higgs ' regime uncertainty all the crazy shit government will do will furhter prevent private actors from risking their money in the marketplace . how is it possible to get hyperinflation out of that mix ? if the fed never stops printing , hyperinflation will happen but not until loads of debt is serviceddefaulted upon . and since we wo n't take the proper medicine , this will probably take years , which leads me to believe that mish 's thinking is correct recession followed by years of modest inflation with intermittent spurts of growth . only then can actual hyperinflation be a threat . i will say that i do n't think there can be deflation psychology without deflation existing . the article addresses multiple hyperinflationist arguments and refutes them . even if you do n't agree with it , i guarantee that you will find it an interestnig read .
c07cf9f
Economics
2,009
because the monetary base has increased substantially . yes , i know . but that does n't mean anything if it and additional bank credit does n't actually make its way into the economy . look at this chart URL . the money supply was soaring during the great depression , too . are you going to argue that the great depresion was hyperinflationary ? if you use a soaring money supply as the sole criterion , then you have to . similarly , look at japan . the boj printed like crazy and it did n't matter people just did n't borrow . and surprise , surprise government spending did n't do anything except astronomically increase government debt . once that money leaves the banking system , it should collapse the dollar . of course . but if the money does n't leave the banking system , mish is right . and his point is it did n't happen in the great depression , it did n't happen in japan , and there 's no reason for it to happen here today . in fact , he says it ca n't happen yet banks are too capital impaired to lend and @@consumers## are too debtridden to borrow . and we have n't even seen the full storm yet of sivs , credit card debt , student loan debt , auto debts , commercial real estate debt , and @@retiring , bankrupt boomers## . much of this debt ca n't be serviced especially with falling wages and rising unemployment and what ca n't be paid back will be defaulted on , which will further cause bank balance sheets to contract and impair lending . plust you have to factor in higgs ' regime uncertainty all the crazy shit government will do will furhter prevent private actors from risking their money in the marketplace . how is it possible to get hyperinflation out of that mix ? if the fed never stops printing , hyperinflation will happen but not until loads of debt is serviceddefaulted upon . and since we wo n't take the proper medicine , this will probably take years , which leads me to believe that mish 's thinking is correct recession followed by years of modest inflation with intermittent spurts of growth . only then can actual hyperinflation be a threat . i will say that i do n't think there can be deflation psychology without deflation existing . the article addresses multiple hyperinflationist arguments and refutes them . even if you do n't agree with it , i guarantee that you will find it an interestnig read .
because the monetary base has increased substantially . yes , i know . but that does n't mean anything if it and additional bank credit does n't actually make its way into the economy . look at this chart URL . the money supply was soaring during the great depression , too . are you going to argue that the great depresion was hyperinflationary ? if you use a soaring money supply as the sole criterion , then you have to . similarly , look at japan . the @@boj## printed like crazy and it did n't matter people just did n't borrow . and surprise , surprise government spending did n't do anything except astronomically increase government debt . once that money leaves the banking system , it should collapse the dollar . of course . but if the money does n't leave the banking system , mish is right . and his point is it did n't happen in the great depression , it did n't happen in japan , and there 's no reason for it to happen here today . in fact , he says it ca n't happen yet banks are too capital impaired to lend and consumers are too debtridden to borrow . and we have n't even seen the full storm yet of sivs , credit card debt , student loan debt , auto debts , commercial real estate debt , and retiring , bankrupt boomers . much of this debt ca n't be serviced especially with falling wages and rising unemployment and what ca n't be paid back will be defaulted on , which will further cause bank balance sheets to contract and impair lending . plust you have to factor in higgs ' regime uncertainty all the crazy shit government will do will furhter prevent @@private actors## from risking their money in the marketplace . how is it possible to get hyperinflation out of that mix ? if the fed never stops printing , hyperinflation will happen but not until loads of debt is serviceddefaulted upon . and since we wo n't take the proper medicine , this will probably take years , which leads me to believe that mish 's thinking is correct recession followed by years of modest inflation with intermittent spurts of growth . only then can actual hyperinflation be a threat . i will say that i do n't think there can be deflation psychology without deflation existing . the article addresses multiple hyperinflationist arguments and refutes them . even if you do n't agree with it , i guarantee that you will find it an interestnig read .
because the monetary base has increased substantially . yes , i know . but that does n't mean anything if it and additional bank credit does n't actually make its way into the economy . look at this chart URL . the money supply was soaring during the great depression , too . are you going to argue that the great depresion was hyperinflationary ? if you use a soaring money supply as the sole criterion , then you have to . similarly , look at japan . the boj printed like crazy and it did n't matter people just did n't borrow . and surprise , surprise government spending did n't do anything except astronomically increase government debt . once that money leaves the banking system , it should collapse the dollar . of course . but if the money does n't leave the banking system , mish is right . and his point is it did n't happen in the great depression , it did n't happen in japan , and there 's no reason for it to happen here today . in fact , he says it ca n't happen yet banks are too capital impaired to lend and @@consumers## are too debtridden to borrow . and we have n't even seen the full storm yet of sivs , credit card debt , student loan debt , auto debts , commercial real estate debt , and @@retiring , bankrupt boomers## . much of this debt ca n't be serviced especially with falling wages and rising unemployment and what ca n't be paid back will be defaulted on , which will further cause bank balance sheets to contract and impair lending . plust you have to factor in higgs ' regime uncertainty all the crazy shit government will do will furhter prevent private actors from risking their money in the marketplace . how is it possible to get hyperinflation out of that mix ? if the fed never stops printing , hyperinflation will happen but not until loads of debt is serviceddefaulted upon . and since we wo n't take the proper medicine , this will probably take years , which leads me to believe that mish 's thinking is correct recession followed by years of modest inflation with intermittent spurts of growth . only then can actual hyperinflation be a threat . i will say that i do n't think there can be deflation psychology without deflation existing . the article addresses multiple hyperinflationist arguments and refutes them . even if you do n't agree with it , i guarantee that you will find it an interestnig read .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "because", "the", "monetary", "base", "has", "increased", "substantially", ".", "yes", ",", "i", "know", ".", "but", "that", "does", "n't", "mean", "anything", "if", "it", "and", "additional", "bank", "credit", "does", "n't", "actually", "make", "its", "way", "into", "the", "economy", ".", "look", "at", "this", "chart", "URL", ".", "the", "money", "supply", "was", "soaring", "during", "the", "great", "depression", ",", "too", ".", "are", "you", "going", "to", "argue", "that", "the", "great", "depresion", "was", "hyperinflationary", "?", "if", "you", "use", "a", "soaring", "money", "supply", "as", "the", "sole", "criterion", ",", "then", "you", "have", "to", ".", "similarly", ",", "look", "at", "japan", ".", "the", "boj", "printed", "like", "crazy", "and", "it", "did", "n't", "matter", "people", "just", "did", "n't", "borrow", ".", "and", "surprise", ",", "surprise", "government", "spending", "did", "n't", "do", "anything", "except", "astronomically", "increase", "government", "debt", ".", "once", "that", "money", "leaves", "the", "banking", "system", ",", "it", "should", "collapse", "the", "dollar", ".", "of", "course", ".", "but", "if", "the", "money", "does", "n't", "leave", "the", "banking", "system", ",", "mish", "is", "right", ".", "and", "his", "point", "is", "it", "did", "n't", "happen", "in", "the", "great", "depression", ",", "it", "did", "n't", "happen", "in", "japan", ",", "and", "there", "'s", "no", "reason", "for", "it", "to", "happen", "here", "today", ".", "in", "fact", ",", "he", "says", "it", "ca", "n't", "happen", "yet", "banks", "are", "too", "capital", "impaired", "to", "lend", "and", "consumers", "are", "too", "debtridden", "to", "borrow", ".", "and", "we", "have", "n't", "even", "seen", "the", "full", "storm", "yet", "of", "sivs", ",", "credit", "card", "debt", ",", "student", "loan", "debt", ",", "auto", "debts", ",", "commercial", "real", "estate", "debt", ",", "and", "retiring", ",", "bankrupt", "boomers", ".", "much", "of", "this", "debt", "ca", "n't", "be", "serviced", "especially", "with", "falling", "wages", "and", "rising", "unemployment", "and", "what", "ca", "n't", "be", "paid", "back", "will", "be", "defaulted", "on", ",", "which", "will", "further", "cause", "bank", "balance", "sheets", "to", "contract", "and", "impair", "lending", ".", "plust", "you", "have", "to", "factor", "in", "higgs", "'", "regime", "uncertainty", "all", "the", "crazy", "shit", "government", "will", "do", "will", "furhter", "prevent", "private", "actors", "from", "risking", "their", "money", "in", "the", "marketplace", ".", "how", "is", "it", "possible", "to", "get", "hyperinflation", "out", "of", "that", "mix", "?", "if", "the", "fed", "never", "stops", "printing", ",", "hyperinflation", "will", "happen", "but", "not", "until", "loads", "of", "debt", "is", "serviceddefaulted", "upon", ".", "and", "since", "we", "wo", "n't", "take", "the", "proper", "medicine", ",", "this", "will", "probably", "take", "years", ",", "which", "leads", "me", "to", "believe", "that", "mish", "'s", "thinking", "is", "correct", "recession", "followed", "by", "years", "of", "modest", "inflation", "with", "intermittent", "spurts", "of", "growth", ".", "only", "then", "can", "actual", "hyperinflation", "be", "a", "threat", ".", "i", "will", "say", "that", "i", "do", "n't", "think", "there", "can", "be", "deflation", "psychology", "without", "deflation", "existing", ".", "the", "article", "addresses", "multiple", "hyperinflationist", "arguments", "and", "refutes", "them", ".", "even", "if", "you", "do", "n't", "agree", "with", "it", ",", "i", "guarantee", "that", "you", "will", "find", "it", "an", "interestnig", "read", "." ]
nope not a single one . steel and equipment were donated for the cause . what was the cost of this ? not everyone is going to have equipment donated to fixing their own roads . this article is b.s
c08t3uf
Economics
2,009
nope not a single one . steel and equipment were donated for the cause . what was the cost of this ? not everyone is going to have equipment donated to fixing their own roads . this article is b.s
nope not a single one . steel and equipment were donated for the cause . what was the cost of this ? not everyone is going to have equipment donated to fixing their own roads . this article is b.s
nope not a single one . steel and equipment were donated for the cause . what was the cost of this ? not everyone is going to have equipment donated to fixing their own roads . this article is b.s
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "nope", "not", "a", "single", "one", ".", "steel", "and", "equipment", "were", "donated", "for", "the", "cause", ".", "what", "was", "the", "cost", "of", "this", "?", "not", "everyone", "is", "going", "to", "have", "equipment", "donated", "to", "fixing", "their", "own", "roads", ".", "this", "article", "is", "b.s" ]
yeah . if that 's your idea of 'proof ' , you must end up buying a lot of bridges .
c0kh21y
Economics
2,010
yeah . if that 's your idea of 'proof ' , you must end up buying a lot of bridges .
yeah . if that 's your idea of 'proof ' , you must end up buying a lot of bridges .
yeah . if that 's your idea of 'proof ' , you must end up buying a lot of bridges .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "yeah", ".", "if", "that", "'s", "your", "idea", "of", "'proof", "'", ",", "you", "must", "end", "up", "buying", "a", "lot", "of", "bridges", "." ]
you bore me with your elitist attitude .
c0pry3b
Economics
2,010
you bore me with your elitist attitude .
you bore me with your elitist attitude .
you bore me with your elitist attitude .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "you", "bore", "me", "with", "your", "elitist", "attitude", "." ]
maybe if we 're going into double digit inflation
c16xnoi
Economics
2,010
maybe if we 're going into double digit inflation
maybe if we 're going into double digit inflation
maybe if we 're going into double digit inflation
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "maybe", "if", "we", "'re", "going", "into", "double", "digit", "inflation" ]
impossible to say , but no one does that when reporting income in the u.s. anyway . people always talk about before tax income .
c16kmo0
Economics
2,010
impossible to say , but no one does that when reporting income in the u.s. anyway . people always talk about before tax income .
impossible to say , but no one does that when reporting income in the u.s. anyway . people always talk about before tax income .
impossible to say , but no one does that when reporting income in the u.s. anyway . people always talk about before tax income .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "impossible", "to", "say", ",", "but", "no", "one", "does", "that", "when", "reporting", "income", "in", "the", "u.s.", "anyway", ".", "people", "always", "talk", "about", "before", "tax", "income", "." ]
best thing is that you can take your own financial decisions .
c0wr6bp
Economics
2,010
best thing is that you can take your own financial decisions .
best thing is that you can take your own financial decisions .
best thing is that you can take your own financial decisions .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "best", "thing", "is", "that", "you", "can", "take", "your", "own", "financial", "decisions", "." ]
this is bullshit . if you can present value to the employer , then you will likely be paid . i only received paid internships as an engineering major , and so did every other person in my major . today , i hire interns to do software engineering and i pay them , because they are profitable plus its rewarding to train people . but hell , if they cost me money or broke even , then i could n't afford to pay them . you are n't entitled to free training from an employer .
c0tc4o1
Economics
2,010
this is bullshit . if you can present value to the employer , then you will likely be paid . i only received paid internships as an engineering major , and so did every other person in my major . today , i hire interns to do software engineering and i pay them , because they are profitable plus its rewarding to train people . but hell , if they cost me money or broke even , then i could n't afford to pay them . you are n't entitled to free training from an employer .
this is bullshit . if you can present value to the employer , then you will likely be paid . i only received paid internships as an engineering major , and so did every other person in my major . today , i hire @@interns## to do software engineering and i pay them , because they are profitable plus its rewarding to train people . but hell , if they cost me money or broke even , then i could n't afford to pay them . you are n't entitled to free training from an employer .
this is bullshit . if you can present value to the employer , then you will likely be paid . i only received paid internships as an engineering major , and so did every other person in my major . today , i hire @@interns## to do software engineering and i pay them , because they are profitable plus its rewarding to train people . but hell , if they cost me money or broke even , then i could n't afford to pay them . you are n't entitled to free training from an employer .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "this", "is", "bullshit", ".", "if", "you", "can", "present", "value", "to", "the", "employer", ",", "then", "you", "will", "likely", "be", "paid", ".", "i", "only", "received", "paid", "internships", "as", "an", "engineering", "major", ",", "and", "so", "did", "every", "other", "person", "in", "my", "major", ".", "today", ",", "i", "hire", "interns", "to", "do", "software", "engineering", "and", "i", "pay", "them", ",", "because", "they", "are", "profitable", "plus", "its", "rewarding", "to", "train", "people", ".", "but", "hell", ",", "if", "they", "cost", "me", "money", "or", "broke", "even", ",", "then", "i", "could", "n't", "afford", "to", "pay", "them", ".", "you", "are", "n't", "entitled", "to", "free", "training", "from", "an", "employer", "." ]
this makes me go hmm ... is there an explanation around from al franken ?
c0pu0fw
Economics
2,010
this makes me go hmm ... is there an explanation around from al franken ?
this makes me go hmm ... is there an explanation around from al franken ?
this makes me go hmm ... is there an explanation around from al franken ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "this", "makes", "me", "go", "hmm", "...", "is", "there", "an", "explanation", "around", "from", "al", "franken", "?" ]
the original argument is that the current unemployment rate is a result of jobs being exported . hopefully , you understand it is not , given the humongous difference between jobs lost in us vs jobs created offshore for the same period .
c1a0a3u
Economics
2,010
the original argument is that the current unemployment rate is a result of jobs being exported . hopefully , you understand it is not , given the humongous difference between jobs lost in us vs jobs created offshore for the same period .
the original argument is that the current unemployment rate is a result of jobs being exported . hopefully , you understand it is not , given the humongous difference between jobs lost in us vs jobs created offshore for the same period .
the original argument is that the current unemployment rate is a result of jobs being exported . hopefully , you understand it is not , given the humongous difference between jobs lost in us vs jobs created offshore for the same period .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "original", "argument", "is", "that", "the", "current", "unemployment", "rate", "is", "a", "result", "of", "jobs", "being", "exported", ".", "hopefully", ",", "you", "understand", "it", "is", "not", ",", "given", "the", "humongous", "difference", "between", "jobs", "lost", "in", "us", "vs", "jobs", "created", "offshore", "for", "the", "same", "period", "." ]
same is true for ceos . too many externalities .
c0utmum
Economics
2,010
same is true for @@ceos## . too many externalities .
same is true for @@ceos## . too many externalities .
same is true for @@ceos## . too many externalities .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "same", "is", "true", "for", "ceos", ".", "too", "many", "externalities", "." ]
not only dead wrong , but a jerk as well ? i ca n't say i like this combination at all .
c0ucneb
Economics
2,010
not only dead wrong , but a jerk as well ? i ca n't say i like this combination at all .
not only dead wrong , but a jerk as well ? i ca n't say i like this combination at all .
not only dead wrong , but a jerk as well ? i ca n't say i like this combination at all .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "not", "only", "dead", "wrong", ",", "but", "a", "jerk", "as", "well", "?", "i", "ca", "n't", "say", "i", "like", "this", "combination", "at", "all", "." ]
out of curiosity , what does gold bug '' mean to you ? that is , you declare yourself to not be one , so you must have some concrete conception of what one is . i 've seen different folks mean different things when they say gold bug '' , and so i am looking for another datapoint . fwiw , i do own physical gold .
c1abcsb
Economics
2,010
out of curiosity , what does gold bug '' mean to you ? that is , you declare yourself to not be one , so you must have some concrete conception of what one is . i 've seen different folks mean different things when they say gold bug '' , and so i am looking for another datapoint . fwiw , i do own physical gold .
out of curiosity , what does gold bug '' mean to you ? that is , you declare yourself to not be one , so you must have some concrete conception of what one is . i 've seen different folks mean different things when they say gold bug '' , and so i am looking for another datapoint . fwiw , i do own physical gold .
out of curiosity , what does gold bug '' mean to you ? that is , you declare yourself to not be one , so you must have some concrete conception of what one is . i 've seen different folks mean different things when they say gold bug '' , and so i am looking for another datapoint . fwiw , i do own physical gold .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "out", "of", "curiosity", ",", "what", "does", "gold", "bug", "``", "mean", "to", "you", "?", "that", "is", ",", "you", "declare", "yourself", "to", "not", "be", "one", ",", "so", "you", "must", "have", "some", "concrete", "conception", "of", "what", "one", "is", ".", "i", "'ve", "seen", "different", "folks", "mean", "different", "things", "when", "they", "say", "gold", "bug", "``", ",", "and", "so", "i", "am", "looking", "for", "another", "datapoint", ".", "fwiw", ",", "i", "do", "own", "physical", "gold", "." ]
bush hehheh . freedom ! hehheh . '' snicker , swagger , smirk
c0iux7r
Economics
2,010
bush hehheh . freedom ! hehheh . '' snicker , swagger , smirk
bush hehheh . freedom ! hehheh . '' snicker , swagger , smirk
bush hehheh . freedom ! hehheh . '' snicker , swagger , smirk
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "bush", "hehheh", ".", "freedom", "!", "hehheh", ".", "``", "snicker", ",", "swagger", ",", "smirk" ]
there are no bad regiments , only bad colonels '' napoleon
c0qsh06
Economics
2,010
there are no bad regiments , only bad colonels '' napoleon
there are no @@bad regiments## , only @@bad colonels## '' napoleon
there are no @@bad regiments## , only @@bad colonels## '' napoleon
[ "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0 ]
[ "there", "are", "no", "bad", "regiments", ",", "only", "bad", "colonels", "``", "napoleon" ]
the next thing kim jong il is going to get from us is a swift kick in the ass he better learn to keep his mouth shut .
c0suchb
Economics
2,010
the next thing kim jong il is going to get from us is a swift kick in the ass he better learn to keep his mouth shut .
the next thing kim jong il is going to get from @@us## is a swift kick in the ass he better learn to keep his mouth shut .
the next thing kim jong il is going to get from us is a swift kick in the ass he better learn to keep his mouth shut .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "next", "thing", "kim", "jong", "il", "is", "going", "to", "get", "from", "us", "is", "a", "swift", "kick", "in", "the", "ass", "he", "better", "learn", "to", "keep", "his", "mouth", "shut", "." ]
should n't a full job allow someone to live semicomfortably ? it depends on how you look at the question . from an economic stand point no . without a price floor minimum wage , supply and depend would set the cost of labor for a particular job . if there qualified people i.e . people employers are willing to hire who will work for less than a living wage , then thats what the market has set the rate at . if you are thinking in terms of what is a just '' wage , then obviously you 'd want to think of the welfare of the workers who may have limited options on where to work . its hard to turn down a job for x dollars when you have no prospect to make x1 dollars . obviously if everyone turned down the job at x dollars the employer would have to raise wages , however its very difficult to go without food or shelter until you feel you are being fairly compensated .
c199gwo
Economics
2,010
should n't a full job allow someone to live semicomfortably ? it depends on how you look at the question . from an economic stand point no . without a price floor minimum wage , supply and depend would set the cost of labor for a particular job . if there qualified people i.e . @@people employers are willing to hire who will work for less than a living wage## , then thats what the market has set the rate at . if you are thinking in terms of what is a just '' wage , then obviously you 'd want to think of the welfare of the @@workers who may have limited options on where to work## . its hard to turn down a job for x dollars when you have no prospect to make x1 dollars . obviously if everyone turned down the job at x dollars the employer would have to raise wages , however its very difficult to go without food or shelter until you feel you are being fairly compensated .
should n't a full job allow someone to live semicomfortably ? it depends on how you look at the question . from an economic stand point no . without a price floor minimum wage , supply and depend would set the cost of labor for a particular job . if there @@qualified people## i.e . @@people employers are willing to hire who will work for less than a living wage## , then thats what the market has set the rate at . if you are thinking in terms of what is a just '' wage , then obviously you 'd want to think of the welfare of the @@workers## who may have limited options on where to work . its hard to turn down a job for x dollars when you have no prospect to make x1 dollars . obviously if everyone turned down the job at x dollars the employer would have to raise wages , however its very difficult to go without food or shelter until you feel you are being fairly compensated .
should n't a full job allow someone to live semicomfortably ? it depends on how you look at the question . from an economic stand point no . without a price floor minimum wage , supply and depend would set the cost of labor for a particular job . if there @@qualified people## i.e . @@people employers are willing to hire who will work for less than a living wage## , then thats what the market has set the rate at . if you are thinking in terms of what is a just '' wage , then obviously you 'd want to think of the welfare of the @@workers## who may have limited options on where to work . its hard to turn down a job for x dollars when you have no prospect to make x1 dollars . obviously if everyone turned down the job at x dollars the employer would have to raise wages , however its very difficult to go without food or shelter until you feel you are being fairly compensated .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "should", "n't", "a", "full", "job", "allow", "someone", "to", "live", "semicomfortably", "?", "it", "depends", "on", "how", "you", "look", "at", "the", "question", ".", "from", "an", "economic", "stand", "point", "no", ".", "without", "a", "price", "floor", "minimum", "wage", ",", "supply", "and", "depend", "would", "set", "the", "cost", "of", "labor", "for", "a", "particular", "job", ".", "if", "there", "qualified", "people", "i.e", ".", "people", "employers", "are", "willing", "to", "hire", "who", "will", "work", "for", "less", "than", "a", "living", "wage", ",", "then", "thats", "what", "the", "market", "has", "set", "the", "rate", "at", ".", "if", "you", "are", "thinking", "in", "terms", "of", "what", "is", "a", "just", "``", "wage", ",", "then", "obviously", "you", "'d", "want", "to", "think", "of", "the", "welfare", "of", "the", "workers", "who", "may", "have", "limited", "options", "on", "where", "to", "work", ".", "its", "hard", "to", "turn", "down", "a", "job", "for", "x", "dollars", "when", "you", "have", "no", "prospect", "to", "make", "x1", "dollars", ".", "obviously", "if", "everyone", "turned", "down", "the", "job", "at", "x", "dollars", "the", "employer", "would", "have", "to", "raise", "wages", ",", "however", "its", "very", "difficult", "to", "go", "without", "food", "or", "shelter", "until", "you", "feel", "you", "are", "being", "fairly", "compensated", "." ]
give this man the nobel price !
c17rt0v
Economics
2,010
give this man the nobel price !
give this man the nobel price !
give this man the nobel price !
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "give", "this", "man", "the", "nobel", "price", "!" ]
not true at all . eliminate the entire military budget and we still run a deficit of several hundred billion right now .
c1136ke
Economics
2,010
not true at all . eliminate the entire military budget and we still run a deficit of several hundred billion right now .
not true at all . eliminate the entire military budget and we still run a deficit of several hundred billion right now .
not true at all . eliminate the entire military budget and we still run a deficit of several hundred billion right now .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "not", "true", "at", "all", ".", "eliminate", "the", "entire", "military", "budget", "and", "we", "still", "run", "a", "deficit", "of", "several", "hundred", "billion", "right", "now", "." ]
i did n't infer that implication at all . as i see it , this article is making the case that workers and businesses should internalize costs and benefits that are currently externalities good morale that comes with happy workers , satisfaction that comes with a job well done , etc . an organization can still run a business with a holistic approach and be completely specialized . division of labor has nothing to do with it .
c0zzayy
Economics
2,010
i did n't infer that implication at all . as i see it , this article is making the case that @@workers## and businesses should internalize costs and benefits that are currently externalities good morale that comes with @@happy workers## , satisfaction that comes with a job well done , etc . an organization can still run a business with a holistic approach and be completely specialized . division of labor has nothing to do with it .
i did n't infer that implication at all . as i see it , this article is making the case that @@workers## and businesses should internalize costs and benefits that are currently externalities good morale that comes with @@happy workers## , satisfaction that comes with a job well done , etc . an organization can still run a business with a holistic approach and be completely specialized . division of labor has nothing to do with it .
i did n't infer that implication at all . as i see it , this article is making the case that @@workers## and businesses should internalize costs and benefits that are currently externalities good morale that comes with @@happy workers## , satisfaction that comes with a job well done , etc . an organization can still run a business with a holistic approach and be completely specialized . division of labor has nothing to do with it .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "did", "n't", "infer", "that", "implication", "at", "all", ".", "as", "i", "see", "it", ",", "this", "article", "is", "making", "the", "case", "that", "workers", "and", "businesses", "should", "internalize", "costs", "and", "benefits", "that", "are", "currently", "externalities", "good", "morale", "that", "comes", "with", "happy", "workers", ",", "satisfaction", "that", "comes", "with", "a", "job", "well", "done", ",", "etc", ".", "an", "organization", "can", "still", "run", "a", "business", "with", "a", "holistic", "approach", "and", "be", "completely", "specialized", ".", "division", "of", "labor", "has", "nothing", "to", "do", "with", "it", "." ]
just a couple of hundred pounds ? haha man you know how much you have to grow to produce 167 pounds being generous and assuming 1500lb wholesale in one harvest ? even assuming everything is hydro , cared for perfectly and you got great yields 34oz or so per plant that would take at least 750 plants . plus that does n't take into consideration the money spent on the setup a shitload to have that kind of production , the time required , the ongoing gigantic electrical bill and maintenance . point is , this kind of grow ca n't be very normal for someone who wants to live in a super expensive tiny house in vancouver .
c0odimo
Economics
2,010
just a couple of hundred pounds ? haha man you know how much you have to grow to produce 167 pounds being generous and assuming 1500lb wholesale in one harvest ? even assuming everything is hydro , cared for perfectly and you got great yields 34oz or so per plant that would take at least 750 plants . plus that does n't take into consideration the money spent on the setup a shitload to have that kind of production , the time required , the ongoing gigantic electrical bill and maintenance . point is , this kind of grow ca n't be very normal for someone who wants to live in a super expensive tiny house in vancouver .
just a couple of hundred pounds ? haha man you know how much you have to grow to produce 167 pounds being generous and assuming 1500lb wholesale in one harvest ? even assuming everything is hydro , cared for perfectly and you got great yields 34oz or so per plant that would take at least 750 plants . plus that does n't take into consideration the money spent on the setup a shitload to have that kind of production , the time required , the ongoing gigantic electrical bill and maintenance . point is , this kind of grow ca n't be very normal for someone who wants to live in a super expensive tiny house in vancouver .
just a couple of hundred pounds ? haha man you know how much you have to grow to produce 167 pounds being generous and assuming 1500lb wholesale in one harvest ? even assuming everything is hydro , cared for perfectly and you got great yields 34oz or so per plant that would take at least 750 plants . plus that does n't take into consideration the money spent on the setup a shitload to have that kind of production , the time required , the ongoing gigantic electrical bill and maintenance . point is , this kind of grow ca n't be very normal for someone who wants to live in a super expensive tiny house in vancouver .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "just", "a", "couple", "of", "hundred", "pounds", "?", "haha", "man", "you", "know", "how", "much", "you", "have", "to", "grow", "to", "produce", "167", "pounds", "being", "generous", "and", "assuming", "1500lb", "wholesale", "in", "one", "harvest", "?", "even", "assuming", "everything", "is", "hydro", ",", "cared", "for", "perfectly", "and", "you", "got", "great", "yields", "34oz", "or", "so", "per", "plant", "that", "would", "take", "at", "least", "750", "plants", ".", "plus", "that", "does", "n't", "take", "into", "consideration", "the", "money", "spent", "on", "the", "setup", "a", "shitload", "to", "have", "that", "kind", "of", "production", ",", "the", "time", "required", ",", "the", "ongoing", "gigantic", "electrical", "bill", "and", "maintenance", ".", "point", "is", ",", "this", "kind", "of", "grow", "ca", "n't", "be", "very", "normal", "for", "someone", "who", "wants", "to", "live", "in", "a", "super", "expensive", "tiny", "house", "in", "vancouver", "." ]
quick question . . . which consumers will they be protecting . . .us or the banks .
c0lfwtf
Economics
2,010
quick question . . . which @@consumers## will they be protecting . . .us or the banks .
quick question . . . which @@consumers## will they be protecting . . .us or the banks .
quick question . . . which @@consumers## will they be protecting . . .us or the banks .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "quick", "question", ".", ".", ".", "which", "consumers", "will", "they", "be", "protecting", ".", ".", ".us", "or", "the", "banks", "." ]
the problem is a bit deeper than just a few crazies . islamic extremism is taught in schools and in mosques . i 'm sure that there a lot of people who do n't buy into it but if the pervasive culture is to teach hatred then ...
c0ra7ff
Economics
2,010
the problem is a bit deeper than just a few crazies . islamic extremism is taught in schools and in mosques . i 'm sure that there a lot of people who do n't buy into it but if the pervasive culture is to teach hatred then ...
the problem is a bit deeper than just a few crazies . islamic extremism is taught in schools and in mosques . i 'm sure that there a lot of people who do n't buy into it but if the pervasive culture is to teach hatred then ...
the problem is a bit deeper than just a few crazies . islamic extremism is taught in schools and in mosques . i 'm sure that there a lot of people who do n't buy into it but if the pervasive culture is to teach hatred then ...
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "problem", "is", "a", "bit", "deeper", "than", "just", "a", "few", "crazies", ".", "islamic", "extremism", "is", "taught", "in", "schools", "and", "in", "mosques", ".", "i", "'m", "sure", "that", "there", "a", "lot", "of", "people", "who", "do", "n't", "buy", "into", "it", "but", "if", "the", "pervasive", "culture", "is", "to", "teach", "hatred", "then", "..." ]
you and i have different definitions of the word short '' .
c0ixrpq
Economics
2,010
you and i have different definitions of the word short '' .
you and i have different definitions of the word short '' .
you and i have different definitions of the word short '' .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "you", "and", "i", "have", "different", "definitions", "of", "the", "word", "short", "``", "." ]
README.md exists but content is empty. Use the Edit dataset card button to edit it.
Downloads last month
4
Edit dataset card