Datasets:

CFettuccini

/

DollylikeDFMPC

like 0

['>>{hearaboutit123} : Millions of Americans could be affected by Obamacare reforms ...if they ever see the light of day. Is Paul Ryan just trying to appease its base ?', '>>{WTCMolybdenum4753} : Hillary’s health: Emails show Clinton obsessed with sleep, “exotic drugs”', ">>{CarrollQuigley} : That's what happens when people are forced to buy insurance or face a fine but cost controls for premiums and drug prices are taken off the table. We need universal healthcare, or at least a public option.", '>>{awaiskhokhar02} : Donald Trump’s bodyguards could be ARRESTED during Scotland visit, security expert warns', '>>{dyzo-blue} : If they take signs off people it could be put down as theft, criminal damage or assault. Now THAT was rather deep in the story, but I guess anything for clicks, right?\ttrcsteve\tt3_4oqvlk\nt3_4oqr3f\tt1_d4et133\t1466292899\tWell, if anyone knows about [exploiting tragedy,](http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site106/2015/1103/20151103_071251_Bag%20Men%20NYPost%20cover.jpg) it\'s the NY Post!\tBochinsky\tt3_4oqr3f\nt3_4oqr3f\tt1_d4et24s\t1466292953\tIt\'s awful because it\'s a lie. The guy that killed Cox was mentally insane, there were no political motivations. No one in the UK has tried to exploit this tragedy, but Hillary is happy to oblige.\tGoofballCircusFreak\tt1_d4esmgh\nt3_4oqr3f\tt1_d4et26f\t1466292956\tRejecting bigotry is rejecting Brexit? Wow, you don\'t think a lot of the Leave proponents.\tYourBlogSucksToo\tt1_d4esu2i\nt3_4oqvlk\tt1_d4et5y3\t1466293149\tTrump doesnt have body guards, he has Secret Service. They are very familiar with international laws, and aren\'t part of Trump\'s PR team. Trump may have PR people trying to keep protestors at a distance, but they aren\'t bodyguards".', ">>{Krisuh} : We just got the demo's in our store and quite honestly it's hard to put down given the right game and app. Depending on the iPad your have, you may want to hold off. I heard there coming out with one for the pro. Totally worth the $100", ">>{hearaboutit123} : No budget analysis, republican base is skeptical and democrats unwilling to co-operate. It's very unlikely anything will come out of this smoke screen.", ">>{greenlife4} : You can tell his article isn't true by how it is.", ">>{Cyberhwk} : I mean, it's possible. Just throw up a bill you know can't get 60 in the Senate so you can say you tried.", '>>{L_Cranston_Shadow} : Not so much a pothole as a sinkhole. The two goals of Obamacare are not exactly opposites, but getting both total coverage of the population with no exclusions or even price difference based on preexisting conditions/health and a reduction in premiums is incredibly unrealistic.', '>>{FREE_HILLARY} : >Ian Yexley, chairman of the Specialist Services Section of the British Security Industry Association, said they would have to abandon such heavy-handed tactics - or face arrest themselves. I doubt it. Secret Service can carry guns in the UK, so I imagine they have some form of diplomatic immunity, or whatever the agreement is for close person protection.', '>>{Innovative_Wombat} : Let\'s hope Ryan is trying to appease the base, because the alternative is indirectly, straight up mass extermination of Americans. Let me explain: Eliminating the individual mandate effectively allows large numbers of people, including healthy young people to go uninsured and rely on the ER for medical care. That eliminates a huge source of funding necessary to fund the care for basically everyone else. The 130% penalty doesn\'t mean jack to healthy people. In actuality, it\'s a disincentive to get insurance at all! This ensures that large populations of healthy youth will avoid getting insurance and providing necessary revenues. *Ryancare is now fully advocating for free riding by the healthy.* Meanwhile, Ryancare keeps the no preconditions and no lifetime limits. This is mathematically **impossible** to fund without the individual mandate. This will force insurers to basically abandon certain markets while jacking up rates on everyone else to avoid the huge costs of those with existing pre-conditions. Essentially, saddling insurance with huge costs while cutting out their revenue is what Ryancare does. This will lead to higher rates of uninsured and the high risk, pre condition people being forced into high risk pools. Here\'s where it gets really dark. Ryancare allocates $15 billion for the first two years and then $10 billion afterward to the states for their medical costs. That can be used for high risk pools. If EVERY state used it for high risk pools, that money wouldn\'t last a month. Michigan\'s "highly acclaimed" high risk pool that Republicans cite as why the ACA sucks cost around $2.5 billion to run decently well pre-ACA. That\'s one state with not even a large population. Multiple this across the country and that $15 billion is a rounding error. These high risk patients are being **sentenced to death by Ryancare.** So when we look at the math, we have two choices. The GOP is either so grossly incompetent they can\'t figure out the obvious mathematical outcome of Ryancare, or they are deliberately trying to indirectly murder Americans in large numbers. **If you have a problem with Republicans trying to murder Americans in large numbers, spread the word about what is going to happen**. Link, share, copy, whatever you want from this post. Civil society cannot stand still as its rulers set upon mass extermination of the citizenry. So Ryan is either playing Partisan games and fully intends for his bill to die....or he\'s actually trying to kill the people of this country.', '>>{newocean} : We need a recess... but not townhalls! Please no more townhalls!', '>>{Bellevue3} : And the SS has proven their bias by not refusing to protect him.', '>>{SchooledGaming} : Aaaaand we are back to this shit. Well I heard from a gypsie in Kansas City that Trump has to take viagra because he has such low energy, stamina, and strength.', '>>{facemeltingalien} : Of course you would say that. You work at a shop that sells it. ಠ_ಠ', '>>{kekus_vult} : Paul Ryan has no base he has donors and connections.', '>>{h9365} : >while another woman wrote: "Oh I\'m coming ya beauty got the day aff..... watch out trump ya troll headed warmonger [I\'m] coming after u! See yi all there!" I wonder if the police made a visit to that woman\'s home.', ">>{trcsteve} : (sigh) Yeah, I know...they got bills to pay, too. This shit makes me think I'm gonna end up on the porch as a grumpy old man yelling at kids to keep off my lawn.", ">>{omeow} : >So when we look at the math, we have two choices. The GOP is either so grossly incompetent they can't figure out the obvious mathematical outcome of Ryancare, or they are deliberately trying to indirectly murder Americans in large numbers. If I recall correctly the bill came out without specific number from congressional budget committee and this was intentional. So I am inclined to believe the second option. GOP opposition to Obamacare was based on some bs principle (which they happily discarded with Trump). It was never ever based on economic discussion. No-one Ryan/Cruz/Paul have any sound economic reasoning beyond some free market bs. I mean these are the same people who talk about liberty and freedom and then approve religious ban/police state/NSA surveillance every chance they get.", '>>{PugiPugiPugi43} : I think he is trying to strike the balance between appeasing the base and appearing sane to most people(even if the plan is bullshit, which it is). They could just scrap it without a replacement and the base would likely love that, but the majority of the country would respond with disgust. He wants the base to go "Well at least he tried" while having the media for the most part report it as "Ryan has a reasonable alternative to the ACA", which makes him look like some sane common sense pragmatic voice in the GOP when he actually has far right beliefs.', ">>{Sasuke082594} : I'm mostly interested in it for my 6s+ and minecraft", ">>{greenareureal} : But these guys have proven they're white power morons by agreeing to protect the Nazi candidate.", ">>{croaky_elvis} : It's worth it for the low latency alone. I've used many a Bluetooth controller, and none came close to the quick response time of the Gamevice. Playing Super Mario via emulator is as close to the real thing as I've seen. I'm using the one for the iPad air 2.", '>>{Trump-Tzu} : The ss may not, under federal law, refuse.', ">>{FREE_HILLARY} : I don't think Secret Service agents choose their assignments. Just like a soldier can't choose not to get deployed.", ">>{Innovative_Wombat} : The screwed up thing about treating healthcare as a free market, is that in a free market, you cut the expensive drag, which would essentially mean we let *a lot* of Americans die because it's not profitable to treat them. Many First World countries have rejected this attitude and run their healthcare as a cost center rather than a profit center viewing the care of their people as something that isn't suppose to be a business. *Even our military healthcare works like that.* > I mean these are the same people who talk about liberty and freedom and then approve religious ban/police state/NSA surveillance every chance they get. Exactly. I find it incredibly difficult as as a guy who leans Conservative/Libertarian to support the current GOP.", '>>{DumpsterDon} : lol. WTF is this shit. Good lord.', '>>{altuniverseyou} : If you took a survey of Trump supporers they would probably most say that Hero Donald already repealled Obamacare with an EO in his first week.', ">>{Vesstair} : He buys into the Clinton health conspiracy. He's obviously already out in his own world. Don't mind him.", '>>{oldbeth} : Racism is illegal there so the SS that tries to protect tRump should be beaten and arrested.', '>>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : He is Secret Service. Assistant Special Agent in Charge, Todd Madison, actually.', '>>{SlicedDicedBeef} : [Blow it out your ass Howard](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsHuNFEa8H4).', ">>{916hotdogs} : I'd love to see some Scotland shitheel cops try to arrest the secret service.", '>>{coco-o} : Apparently she can hold her alcohol better than a man. Must be from the decades of baseless Republican attacks. *cough*', ">>{CLcore} : Many GOP congressmen and senators had far better job security under Obama and would have continued to do so under Hillary. Now they're faced with having to actually do their job instead of obstructing.", ">>{Stellaaahhhh} : The Secret Service agent? He's a Secret Service Agent. Presidential candidates have those.", ">>{Sasuke082594} : I actually picked it up a while ago and I love it. And I don't plan on upgrading to the ugly iPhone 7 so it will be useful for a while. One thing is for sure, Minecraft is much more enjoyable on iOS.", '>>{dagwood222} : Also, GOP spent years making the bill as complicated as possible to slow it down. Obama thought they could pass it in 6 months when they started, barely got voted in and the GOPs were fighting it to the last second.', '>>{CarmineFields} : And out of 44 presidents, almost all are dead!!! What does that tell you? Check mate!', '>>{Sasuke082594} : I play every version of minecraft but I play on the vita the most.', '>>{Kheron} : Ikr? How dare the secret service protect a presidential candidate.', ">>{Trump-Tzu} : Edit: I misread, thought he was saying the secret service shouldn't protect those they disagree with.", '>>{BasketDweller} : The GOP had nothing to do with this nightmare of a bill.', ">>{Plisskens_snake} : You think it's easy cranking up a seventy year old cock?", '>>{Muchhappiernow} : How does being fired for refusing to do your job relate to fascism/totalitarianism by any definition?', ">>{123gogogogo} : People say Trump has lupus. Good people. I don't know, I hear things. People talk to me about this kind of stuff. What exactly is he hiding?", '>>{dagwood222} : So Reagan had Iran-Contra, which involved secret deals with Iran, illegally smuggling guns to terrorists in South America on airplanes that came back full of cocaine and other high crimes, and his legacy is untarnished?', '>>{Trump-Tzu} : Sorry I read his response incorrectly and thought he was advocating the secret service refuse to protect people that they disagree with politically.', ">>{Smittywerbenjensen} : I'm thinking of getting the gamevice for the pro 9.7. Can i ask how you got emulators to work on ios? Do you have to jailbreak? And how is the gamepad holding up? Thanks in advance", '>>{sundialinshade} : > one of Trump’s security men was prevented from entering the Scottish parliament as he was carrying what was believed to be a can of mace. In fact, it was Trump’s hairspray https://www.buzzfeed.com/jamieross/the-ballooning-of-donald-trump?utm_term=.lja06jknk#.lta18GvJv', '>>{crangina} : A lot of smart people are saying Trump wears adult diapers because he has a leaky butt.', ">>{croaky_elvis} : Gamepad has been holding up great! Quality is outstanding. As far as emulators, check out Provenance. You don't need jailbreak, just either: 1) a developer account and a Mac to build and install, or 2) a builds.io subscription to install from there I've used both methods and can vouch for them. Good luck!", '>>{ObedientLittleShill} : Isn\'t it a well known fact that Hillary slipped and hit her head on a concrete floor in Washington? She sent out emails saying quote "having a cracked skull is no fun"? When the incident happened the media was very interested in if a seizure had occured. Why do you think the idea that she\'s sick is so outlandish? Didn\'t they question both McCain\'s physical and psychiatric health when he ran? I thought that was perfectly reasonable just as much as I feel Hillary needs to be healthy and able too.', ">>{rob_banks} : She probably wouldn't cross the street to meet you unless you pay her", ">>{MarioTheGOATChalmers} : I'd vote for a golden retriever to be president over Trump.", ">>{Smittywerbenjensen} : Awesome dude. Thanks for getting back to me. Just a few more questions if you don't mind. I read somewhere that playing with a gamepad on iOS for emulator use is quite laggy. Do you find this with the gamevice? Have you tried the gamepad with the moonlight app? If so, how well does it work? Is the gamevice comfortable to use? Thanks again.", '>>{AdalineMaj} : Quite the opposite. The fight to provide care for all Americans has been going on for a century. Obama actually began the process. Despite him not fixing HC in the first shot, the work he has done to put us on that path will likely put him up there with many of our best presidents.', '>>{Muchhappiernow} : I figured. You seem to usually be more on point with your retorts than that.', ">>{croaky_elvis} : Emulation using the GameVice is the smoothest that I've experienced. Having the lightning connector makes all the difference - I've tried using Bluetooth gamepads in the past and can attest to the laggy experience that you mentioned. Response time with the GameVice is almost perfect, and it's especially noticeable in platformers like Super Mario World. I have not used the Moonlight app. I don't have a PC capable of game streaming. If only this worked with Xbox streaming! I'm still holding out hope that Microsoft is working on this. GameVice is actually quite comfortable on the iPad Air 2. Having the left and right side controls so far apart feels different at first, but it's more comfortable on the wrists.", '>>{Beo1} : You know, except for providing its entire intellectual genesis, and implementing it in Massachusetts...', ">>{Smittywerbenjensen} : Thanks. You've sold me on the gamevice. Xbox streaming would be sweet on the iPad. I've also subscribed to builds.io and have managed to install provenance (I don't have a Mac to do it the other way). Installed a genesis game to test and it works perfectly. Glad I can use emulators again, something I missed after recently switching from android to IOS. All the best.", '>>{croaky_elvis} : Awesome! I hope you love it as much as I do =)', '>>{BasketDweller} : Ah yes, the old "it was a Heritage Foundation plan" canard. Jonathan Gruber was the architect in Massachusetts as well as nationally and he is as Democrat as they come. It was passed in Massachusetts by a Democratic State Congress. But yes. Romney did sign it into law.', '>>{spaceghoti} : > Ah yes, the old "it was a Heritage Foundation plan" canard. It isn\'t a canard if we can prove it. http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/stories/2010/february/23/gop-1993-health-reform-bill.aspx http://americablog.com/2013/10/original-1989-document-heritage-foundation-created-obamacares-individual-mandate.html http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/04/12/463097/romneycare-6/# http://www.redstate.com/rightwingnut2/2011/04/10/romney-in-2007-romneycare-will-be-a-model-for-the-nation/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/aroy/2011/10/11/how-mitt-romneys-health-care-experts-helped-design-obamacare/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2012/02/07/the-tortuous-conservative-history-of-the-individual-mandate/', ">>{CorrectingPropaganda} : So Hillary is a functioning alcoholic and Donald doesn't drink a drop", ">>{spaceghoti} : Right, because that totally negates the fact that Obamacare was built on Romneycare which was designed by the same people who proposed Gingrich's alternative reform policy to block Hillarycare, who themselves initially proposed the health insurance mandates in 1989. Seriously, is that all you've got?", '>>{MarioTheGOATChalmers} : Yes that barking woman is a million times more qualified than Donald Trump.', ">>{rob_banks} : That's the second time I've had to post that video in response to that talking point. The whole thing about voting for Golden Retriever over Trump, two days ago some new Reddit account said the same thing.", '>>{wavescrashover} : > When the incident happened the media was very interested in if a seizure had occured. Actually, when the incident happened a lot of people thought she was just faking it to get out of or delay having to testify about Benghazi. [8 People Who Thought Hillary Clinton Was Faking Her Concussion](https://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/people-who-thought-hillary-clinton-was-faking-her?utm_term=.vbxz5nbwm#.giYPJ3Mx0) [Republicans Accuse Hilary Clinton of Lying About Concussion](http://www.politicususa.com/2012/12/19/republicans-accuse-hilary-clinton-lying-concussion.html) [The Latest Benghazi Conspiracy: Hillary Faked Concussion To Avoid Blame](https://thinkprogress.org/the-latest-benghazi-conspiracy-hillary-faked-concussion-to-avoid-blame-12502e66950d#.qilom3d7t) ["Did She Fake It?": LA Times Mainstreams Clinton Concussion Conspiracy](http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/12/20/did-she-fake-it-la-times-mainstreams-clinton-co/191928) [Devious Karl Rove sets trap to catch Hillary’s lies](http://www.bizpacreview.com/2014/05/16/devious-karl-rove-sets-trap-to-catch-hillarys-lies-119407)', '>>{dipsetbiatch} : The Rebel is literally below Breitbart it terms of credibility. Where are the mods?', '>>{MarioTheGOATChalmers} : The account you responded to is 4 years old and is also my alt.', '>>{travio} : When someone assembles two word quotes from different emails without linking to the emails in question, you know they likely took the quotes out of context.', ">>{travio} : There was some discussion of McCain's age, just like reagan's age was a minor issue. There was nothing like the right wing press is doing now.", ">>{MarioTheGOATChalmers} : It's in case i get banned from a subreddit i like.", '>>{rob_banks} : Totally against the rules. Hillary would be proud.', '>>{dracorojas27} : No, he does amphetamines and sniffing glue from what I heard. The best people told me this', ">>{MarioTheGOATChalmers} : She'd also still be a better president than Trump. So would I btw.", ">>{ObedientLittleShill} : No sorry it wasn't just age. [McCain faces questions on age, health - CNN 2008](http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/10/08/ftl.mccain.health/index.html?eref=rss_latest)", ">>{growyurown} : Baseless? I'm not an R and that is sad. She brings half this shit on herself. Here is a novel idea, tell the truth. You may find yourself in a better position.", ">>{ryarger} : Where are her lies on Whitewater, Vince Foster and the dozens of other deaths she's blamed for, Bill's affairs, Benghazi, etc., etc...? The list of made up shit against Hillary is a mile long. She lies as much as any politician - that is, more than I'd like - but she is attacked without cause an order of magnitude more and has been for a quarter century. Not that non-subservient women trigger the right or anything, there's gotta be some other explanation...", ">>{SchooledGaming} : So because she hit her head, she can't be president? And I didn't question McCain health until he ruled out Palin and I realized the dumbest human in America could be president.", ">>{growyurown} : You think she hasn't done all she can to ruin the lives of the woman Bill poked? She certainly didn't help them when they accused bill of rape. After spouting all this shit about womens rights she did all she could to make sure the lives of these women were ruined. Take the email issue for example. How is this simply the Rs attacking her? She claims to be transparent, and then lies about it, and then attempts to lie about wiping the server. Now she is trying to say Colin Powell told her to. Funny things is she did it a year before speaking to Powell. So please explain to me how she doesn't warrant the constant scrutiny? She has lost the trust of the majority of the country. This is a fact, not an opinion. I'm sorry friend, but she brings it upon herself.", '>>{ryarger} : > She certainly didn\'t help them when they accused bill of rape. Do *you* believe they were telling the truth? After all this time, with no evidence and no charges, what brings you to the conclusion that they were telling the truth? > Take the email issue for example. I didn\'t mention that specifically because she *is* culpable for that one. It\'s not the dire act of treason that some accuse her of - in fact it\'s no worse that her predecessors did - but it was still a mistake and one she is responsible for. That\'s *one* out of dozens and dozens of "scandals". Explain to me again about how she brings it on herself.', '>>{growyurown} : If you are questioned, and lie about it, you earn what you get. This is consistent with both Bill and Hillary. It is very apparent her foundation had easier access to the state department than any other person would ever attain. Or is that just a fallacy too? And yes, I do believe Bill forced himself on some of these women assuming he was so powerful he could get away with it. Many rapes go uncharged for much less powerful deviant pieces of shit. How many you want me to list before you admit she brings the scrutiny all by herself.', ">>{coco-o} : Lol, if she was a functioning alcoholic she'd still be doing better than Trump does sober."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{Krisuh} : We just got the demo's in our store and quite honestly it's hard to put down given the right game and app. Depending on the iPad your have, you may want to hold off. I heard there coming out with one for the pro. Totally worth the $100", '>>{facemeltingalien} : Of course you would say that. You work at a shop that sells it. ಠ_ಠ', ">>{Sasuke082594} : I'm mostly interested in it for my 6s+ and minecraft", ">>{croaky_elvis} : It's worth it for the low latency alone. I've used many a Bluetooth controller, and none came close to the quick response time of the Gamevice. Playing Super Mario via emulator is as close to the real thing as I've seen. I'm using the one for the iPad air 2.", ">>{Sasuke082594} : I actually picked it up a while ago and I love it. And I don't plan on upgrading to the ugly iPhone 7 so it will be useful for a while. One thing is for sure, Minecraft is much more enjoyable on iOS.", '>>{Sasuke082594} : I play every version of minecraft but I play on the vita the most.', ">>{Smittywerbenjensen} : I'm thinking of getting the gamevice for the pro 9.7. Can i ask how you got emulators to work on ios? Do you have to jailbreak? And how is the gamepad holding up? Thanks in advance", ">>{croaky_elvis} : Gamepad has been holding up great! Quality is outstanding. As far as emulators, check out Provenance. You don't need jailbreak, just either: 1) a developer account and a Mac to build and install, or 2) a builds.io subscription to install from there I've used both methods and can vouch for them. Good luck!", ">>{Smittywerbenjensen} : Awesome dude. Thanks for getting back to me. Just a few more questions if you don't mind. I read somewhere that playing with a gamepad on iOS for emulator use is quite laggy. Do you find this with the gamevice? Have you tried the gamepad with the moonlight app? If so, how well does it work? Is the gamevice comfortable to use? Thanks again.", ">>{croaky_elvis} : Emulation using the GameVice is the smoothest that I've experienced. Having the lightning connector makes all the difference - I've tried using Bluetooth gamepads in the past and can attest to the laggy experience that you mentioned. Response time with the GameVice is almost perfect, and it's especially noticeable in platformers like Super Mario World. I have not used the Moonlight app. I don't have a PC capable of game streaming. If only this worked with Xbox streaming! I'm still holding out hope that Microsoft is working on this. GameVice is actually quite comfortable on the iPad Air 2. Having the left and right side controls so far apart feels different at first, but it's more comfortable on the wrists.", ">>{Smittywerbenjensen} : Thanks. You've sold me on the gamevice. Xbox streaming would be sweet on the iPad. I've also subscribed to builds.io and have managed to install provenance (I don't have a Mac to do it the other way). Installed a genesis game to test and it works perfectly. Glad I can use emulators again, something I missed after recently switching from android to IOS. All the best.", '>>{croaky_elvis} : Awesome! I hope you love it as much as I do =)'], [">>{CarrollQuigley} : That's what happens when people are forced to buy insurance or face a fine but cost controls for premiums and drug prices are taken off the table. We need universal healthcare, or at least a public option.", '>>{L_Cranston_Shadow} : Not so much a pothole as a sinkhole. The two goals of Obamacare are not exactly opposites, but getting both total coverage of the population with no exclusions or even price difference based on preexisting conditions/health and a reduction in premiums is incredibly unrealistic.', '>>{dagwood222} : Also, GOP spent years making the bill as complicated as possible to slow it down. Obama thought they could pass it in 6 months when they started, barely got voted in and the GOPs were fighting it to the last second.', '>>{BasketDweller} : The GOP had nothing to do with this nightmare of a bill.', '>>{dagwood222} : So Reagan had Iran-Contra, which involved secret deals with Iran, illegally smuggling guns to terrorists in South America on airplanes that came back full of cocaine and other high crimes, and his legacy is untarnished?', '>>{AdalineMaj} : Quite the opposite. The fight to provide care for all Americans has been going on for a century. Obama actually began the process. Despite him not fixing HC in the first shot, the work he has done to put us on that path will likely put him up there with many of our best presidents.', '>>{Beo1} : You know, except for providing its entire intellectual genesis, and implementing it in Massachusetts...', '>>{BasketDweller} : Ah yes, the old "it was a Heritage Foundation plan" canard. Jonathan Gruber was the architect in Massachusetts as well as nationally and he is as Democrat as they come. It was passed in Massachusetts by a Democratic State Congress. But yes. Romney did sign it into law.', '>>{spaceghoti} : > Ah yes, the old "it was a Heritage Foundation plan" canard. It isn\'t a canard if we can prove it. http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/stories/2010/february/23/gop-1993-health-reform-bill.aspx http://americablog.com/2013/10/original-1989-document-heritage-foundation-created-obamacares-individual-mandate.html http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/04/12/463097/romneycare-6/# http://www.redstate.com/rightwingnut2/2011/04/10/romney-in-2007-romneycare-will-be-a-model-for-the-nation/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/aroy/2011/10/11/how-mitt-romneys-health-care-experts-helped-design-obamacare/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2012/02/07/the-tortuous-conservative-history-of-the-individual-mandate/', ">>{spaceghoti} : Right, because that totally negates the fact that Obamacare was built on Romneycare which was designed by the same people who proposed Gingrich's alternative reform policy to block Hillarycare, who themselves initially proposed the health insurance mandates in 1989. Seriously, is that all you've got?"], ['>>{WTCMolybdenum4753} : Hillary’s health: Emails show Clinton obsessed with sleep, “exotic drugs”', ">>{greenlife4} : You can tell his article isn't true by how it is.", '>>{SchooledGaming} : Aaaaand we are back to this shit. Well I heard from a gypsie in Kansas City that Trump has to take viagra because he has such low energy, stamina, and strength.', '>>{DumpsterDon} : lol. WTF is this shit. Good lord.', ">>{Vesstair} : He buys into the Clinton health conspiracy. He's obviously already out in his own world. Don't mind him.", '>>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : He is Secret Service. Assistant Special Agent in Charge, Todd Madison, actually.', '>>{coco-o} : Apparently she can hold her alcohol better than a man. Must be from the decades of baseless Republican attacks. *cough*', ">>{Stellaaahhhh} : The Secret Service agent? He's a Secret Service Agent. Presidential candidates have those.", '>>{CarmineFields} : And out of 44 presidents, almost all are dead!!! What does that tell you? Check mate!', ">>{Plisskens_snake} : You think it's easy cranking up a seventy year old cock?", ">>{123gogogogo} : People say Trump has lupus. Good people. I don't know, I hear things. People talk to me about this kind of stuff. What exactly is he hiding?", '>>{crangina} : A lot of smart people are saying Trump wears adult diapers because he has a leaky butt.', '>>{ObedientLittleShill} : Isn\'t it a well known fact that Hillary slipped and hit her head on a concrete floor in Washington? She sent out emails saying quote "having a cracked skull is no fun"? When the incident happened the media was very interested in if a seizure had occured. Why do you think the idea that she\'s sick is so outlandish? Didn\'t they question both McCain\'s physical and psychiatric health when he ran? I thought that was perfectly reasonable just as much as I feel Hillary needs to be healthy and able too.', ">>{rob_banks} : She probably wouldn't cross the street to meet you unless you pay her", ">>{MarioTheGOATChalmers} : I'd vote for a golden retriever to be president over Trump.", ">>{CorrectingPropaganda} : So Hillary is a functioning alcoholic and Donald doesn't drink a drop", '>>{MarioTheGOATChalmers} : Yes that barking woman is a million times more qualified than Donald Trump.', ">>{rob_banks} : That's the second time I've had to post that video in response to that talking point. The whole thing about voting for Golden Retriever over Trump, two days ago some new Reddit account said the same thing.", '>>{wavescrashover} : > When the incident happened the media was very interested in if a seizure had occured. Actually, when the incident happened a lot of people thought she was just faking it to get out of or delay having to testify about Benghazi. [8 People Who Thought Hillary Clinton Was Faking Her Concussion](https://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/people-who-thought-hillary-clinton-was-faking-her?utm_term=.vbxz5nbwm#.giYPJ3Mx0) [Republicans Accuse Hilary Clinton of Lying About Concussion](http://www.politicususa.com/2012/12/19/republicans-accuse-hilary-clinton-lying-concussion.html) [The Latest Benghazi Conspiracy: Hillary Faked Concussion To Avoid Blame](https://thinkprogress.org/the-latest-benghazi-conspiracy-hillary-faked-concussion-to-avoid-blame-12502e66950d#.qilom3d7t) ["Did She Fake It?": LA Times Mainstreams Clinton Concussion Conspiracy](http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/12/20/did-she-fake-it-la-times-mainstreams-clinton-co/191928) [Devious Karl Rove sets trap to catch Hillary’s lies](http://www.bizpacreview.com/2014/05/16/devious-karl-rove-sets-trap-to-catch-hillarys-lies-119407)', '>>{dipsetbiatch} : The Rebel is literally below Breitbart it terms of credibility. Where are the mods?', '>>{MarioTheGOATChalmers} : The account you responded to is 4 years old and is also my alt.', '>>{travio} : When someone assembles two word quotes from different emails without linking to the emails in question, you know they likely took the quotes out of context.', ">>{travio} : There was some discussion of McCain's age, just like reagan's age was a minor issue. There was nothing like the right wing press is doing now.", ">>{MarioTheGOATChalmers} : It's in case i get banned from a subreddit i like.", '>>{rob_banks} : Totally against the rules. Hillary would be proud.', '>>{dracorojas27} : No, he does amphetamines and sniffing glue from what I heard. The best people told me this', ">>{MarioTheGOATChalmers} : She'd also still be a better president than Trump. So would I btw.", ">>{ObedientLittleShill} : No sorry it wasn't just age. [McCain faces questions on age, health - CNN 2008](http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/10/08/ftl.mccain.health/index.html?eref=rss_latest)", ">>{growyurown} : Baseless? I'm not an R and that is sad. She brings half this shit on herself. Here is a novel idea, tell the truth. You may find yourself in a better position.", ">>{ryarger} : Where are her lies on Whitewater, Vince Foster and the dozens of other deaths she's blamed for, Bill's affairs, Benghazi, etc., etc...? The list of made up shit against Hillary is a mile long. She lies as much as any politician - that is, more than I'd like - but she is attacked without cause an order of magnitude more and has been for a quarter century. Not that non-subservient women trigger the right or anything, there's gotta be some other explanation...", ">>{SchooledGaming} : So because she hit her head, she can't be president? And I didn't question McCain health until he ruled out Palin and I realized the dumbest human in America could be president.", ">>{growyurown} : You think she hasn't done all she can to ruin the lives of the woman Bill poked? She certainly didn't help them when they accused bill of rape. After spouting all this shit about womens rights she did all she could to make sure the lives of these women were ruined. Take the email issue for example. How is this simply the Rs attacking her? She claims to be transparent, and then lies about it, and then attempts to lie about wiping the server. Now she is trying to say Colin Powell told her to. Funny things is she did it a year before speaking to Powell. So please explain to me how she doesn't warrant the constant scrutiny? She has lost the trust of the majority of the country. This is a fact, not an opinion. I'm sorry friend, but she brings it upon herself.", '>>{ryarger} : > She certainly didn\'t help them when they accused bill of rape. Do *you* believe they were telling the truth? After all this time, with no evidence and no charges, what brings you to the conclusion that they were telling the truth? > Take the email issue for example. I didn\'t mention that specifically because she *is* culpable for that one. It\'s not the dire act of treason that some accuse her of - in fact it\'s no worse that her predecessors did - but it was still a mistake and one she is responsible for. That\'s *one* out of dozens and dozens of "scandals". Explain to me again about how she brings it on herself.', '>>{growyurown} : If you are questioned, and lie about it, you earn what you get. This is consistent with both Bill and Hillary. It is very apparent her foundation had easier access to the state department than any other person would ever attain. Or is that just a fallacy too? And yes, I do believe Bill forced himself on some of these women assuming he was so powerful he could get away with it. Many rapes go uncharged for much less powerful deviant pieces of shit. How many you want me to list before you admit she brings the scrutiny all by herself.', ">>{coco-o} : Lol, if she was a functioning alcoholic she'd still be doing better than Trump does sober."], ['>>{hearaboutit123} : Millions of Americans could be affected by Obamacare reforms ...if they ever see the light of day. Is Paul Ryan just trying to appease its base ?', ">>{hearaboutit123} : No budget analysis, republican base is skeptical and democrats unwilling to co-operate. It's very unlikely anything will come out of this smoke screen.", ">>{Cyberhwk} : I mean, it's possible. Just throw up a bill you know can't get 60 in the Senate so you can say you tried.", '>>{Innovative_Wombat} : Let\'s hope Ryan is trying to appease the base, because the alternative is indirectly, straight up mass extermination of Americans. Let me explain: Eliminating the individual mandate effectively allows large numbers of people, including healthy young people to go uninsured and rely on the ER for medical care. That eliminates a huge source of funding necessary to fund the care for basically everyone else. The 130% penalty doesn\'t mean jack to healthy people. In actuality, it\'s a disincentive to get insurance at all! This ensures that large populations of healthy youth will avoid getting insurance and providing necessary revenues. *Ryancare is now fully advocating for free riding by the healthy.* Meanwhile, Ryancare keeps the no preconditions and no lifetime limits. This is mathematically **impossible** to fund without the individual mandate. This will force insurers to basically abandon certain markets while jacking up rates on everyone else to avoid the huge costs of those with existing pre-conditions. Essentially, saddling insurance with huge costs while cutting out their revenue is what Ryancare does. This will lead to higher rates of uninsured and the high risk, pre condition people being forced into high risk pools. Here\'s where it gets really dark. Ryancare allocates $15 billion for the first two years and then $10 billion afterward to the states for their medical costs. That can be used for high risk pools. If EVERY state used it for high risk pools, that money wouldn\'t last a month. Michigan\'s "highly acclaimed" high risk pool that Republicans cite as why the ACA sucks cost around $2.5 billion to run decently well pre-ACA. That\'s one state with not even a large population. Multiple this across the country and that $15 billion is a rounding error. These high risk patients are being **sentenced to death by Ryancare.** So when we look at the math, we have two choices. The GOP is either so grossly incompetent they can\'t figure out the obvious mathematical outcome of Ryancare, or they are deliberately trying to indirectly murder Americans in large numbers. **If you have a problem with Republicans trying to murder Americans in large numbers, spread the word about what is going to happen**. Link, share, copy, whatever you want from this post. Civil society cannot stand still as its rulers set upon mass extermination of the citizenry. So Ryan is either playing Partisan games and fully intends for his bill to die....or he\'s actually trying to kill the people of this country.', '>>{newocean} : We need a recess... but not townhalls! Please no more townhalls!', '>>{kekus_vult} : Paul Ryan has no base he has donors and connections.', ">>{omeow} : >So when we look at the math, we have two choices. The GOP is either so grossly incompetent they can't figure out the obvious mathematical outcome of Ryancare, or they are deliberately trying to indirectly murder Americans in large numbers. If I recall correctly the bill came out without specific number from congressional budget committee and this was intentional. So I am inclined to believe the second option. GOP opposition to Obamacare was based on some bs principle (which they happily discarded with Trump). It was never ever based on economic discussion. No-one Ryan/Cruz/Paul have any sound economic reasoning beyond some free market bs. I mean these are the same people who talk about liberty and freedom and then approve religious ban/police state/NSA surveillance every chance they get.", '>>{PugiPugiPugi43} : I think he is trying to strike the balance between appeasing the base and appearing sane to most people(even if the plan is bullshit, which it is). They could just scrap it without a replacement and the base would likely love that, but the majority of the country would respond with disgust. He wants the base to go "Well at least he tried" while having the media for the most part report it as "Ryan has a reasonable alternative to the ACA", which makes him look like some sane common sense pragmatic voice in the GOP when he actually has far right beliefs.', ">>{Innovative_Wombat} : The screwed up thing about treating healthcare as a free market, is that in a free market, you cut the expensive drag, which would essentially mean we let *a lot* of Americans die because it's not profitable to treat them. Many First World countries have rejected this attitude and run their healthcare as a cost center rather than a profit center viewing the care of their people as something that isn't suppose to be a business. *Even our military healthcare works like that.* > I mean these are the same people who talk about liberty and freedom and then approve religious ban/police state/NSA surveillance every chance they get. Exactly. I find it incredibly difficult as as a guy who leans Conservative/Libertarian to support the current GOP.", '>>{altuniverseyou} : If you took a survey of Trump supporers they would probably most say that Hero Donald already repealled Obamacare with an EO in his first week.', ">>{CLcore} : Many GOP congressmen and senators had far better job security under Obama and would have continued to do so under Hillary. Now they're faced with having to actually do their job instead of obstructing."], ['>>{awaiskhokhar02} : Donald Trump’s bodyguards could be ARRESTED during Scotland visit, security expert warns', '>>{dyzo-blue} : If they take signs off people it could be put down as theft, criminal damage or assault. Now THAT was rather deep in the story, but I guess anything for clicks, right?\ttrcsteve\tt3_4oqvlk\nt3_4oqr3f\tt1_d4et133\t1466292899\tWell, if anyone knows about [exploiting tragedy,](http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site106/2015/1103/20151103_071251_Bag%20Men%20NYPost%20cover.jpg) it\'s the NY Post!\tBochinsky\tt3_4oqr3f\nt3_4oqr3f\tt1_d4et24s\t1466292953\tIt\'s awful because it\'s a lie. The guy that killed Cox was mentally insane, there were no political motivations. No one in the UK has tried to exploit this tragedy, but Hillary is happy to oblige.\tGoofballCircusFreak\tt1_d4esmgh\nt3_4oqr3f\tt1_d4et26f\t1466292956\tRejecting bigotry is rejecting Brexit? Wow, you don\'t think a lot of the Leave proponents.\tYourBlogSucksToo\tt1_d4esu2i\nt3_4oqvlk\tt1_d4et5y3\t1466293149\tTrump doesnt have body guards, he has Secret Service. They are very familiar with international laws, and aren\'t part of Trump\'s PR team. Trump may have PR people trying to keep protestors at a distance, but they aren\'t bodyguards".', '>>{FREE_HILLARY} : >Ian Yexley, chairman of the Specialist Services Section of the British Security Industry Association, said they would have to abandon such heavy-handed tactics - or face arrest themselves. I doubt it. Secret Service can carry guns in the UK, so I imagine they have some form of diplomatic immunity, or whatever the agreement is for close person protection.', '>>{Bellevue3} : And the SS has proven their bias by not refusing to protect him.', '>>{h9365} : >while another woman wrote: "Oh I\'m coming ya beauty got the day aff..... watch out trump ya troll headed warmonger [I\'m] coming after u! See yi all there!" I wonder if the police made a visit to that woman\'s home.', ">>{trcsteve} : (sigh) Yeah, I know...they got bills to pay, too. This shit makes me think I'm gonna end up on the porch as a grumpy old man yelling at kids to keep off my lawn.", ">>{greenareureal} : But these guys have proven they're white power morons by agreeing to protect the Nazi candidate.", '>>{Trump-Tzu} : The ss may not, under federal law, refuse.', ">>{FREE_HILLARY} : I don't think Secret Service agents choose their assignments. Just like a soldier can't choose not to get deployed.", '>>{oldbeth} : Racism is illegal there so the SS that tries to protect tRump should be beaten and arrested.', '>>{SlicedDicedBeef} : [Blow it out your ass Howard](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsHuNFEa8H4).', ">>{916hotdogs} : I'd love to see some Scotland shitheel cops try to arrest the secret service.", '>>{Kheron} : Ikr? How dare the secret service protect a presidential candidate.', ">>{Trump-Tzu} : Edit: I misread, thought he was saying the secret service shouldn't protect those they disagree with.", '>>{Muchhappiernow} : How does being fired for refusing to do your job relate to fascism/totalitarianism by any definition?', '>>{Trump-Tzu} : Sorry I read his response incorrectly and thought he was advocating the secret service refuse to protect people that they disagree with politically.', '>>{sundialinshade} : > one of Trump’s security men was prevented from entering the Scottish parliament as he was carrying what was believed to be a can of mace. In fact, it was Trump’s hairspray https://www.buzzfeed.com/jamieross/the-ballooning-of-donald-trump?utm_term=.lja06jknk#.lta18GvJv', '>>{Muchhappiernow} : I figured. You seem to usually be more on point with your retorts than that.']]

classify and reply

['>>{pktron} : This is a very good move. Sanders having acts of good will with the DNC (and vice versa!) is an important step of mending the perceived rift between progressives and the DNC. The Sanders campaign never felt remotely as wronged by the actions of the DNC as many of his supporters felt, but that is still a point that needs to be healed.', '>>{DeadTrumps} : This is a good thing. DNC needs to move left and get grassroots support and Bernie needs to help convince his people to unite with the DNC.', ">>{Endorn} : Because Bernie shouldn't be touring with Perez until Perez lays out a progressive agenda. I'm disappointed in Bernie.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : Unity is badly needed. But I have to say, establishment democrats and those that support them, need to concede to their progressive friends a little bit and that will eliminate a lot of the negativity. The democrats are still very divided. As evident by any post posted here with Clinton in the title (half or more of the comment chains get collapsed from downvotes). Glad to see this, but words only go so far. Make sure to actually back up the lip service with actions on occasions. That's the quickest path to mending wounds. That's what speaks to the progressive voter more than anything. And so far the three people put into leadership (thus the three opportunities democrats have had to include the progressive wing more into the leadership) have been disappointing. Sanders seems like a mascot the democrats wield more than anything. Let's make sure as a community that some of his ideas actually get some of the backing of the DNC. EDIT: And of course this gets down-voted (eye roll)", ">>{6heismans} : He also basically supported the Syrian attack. Not a great week for him. Although I don't have huge issue with the tour. Perez still needs to make a lot of changes. But there are seats to win right now and If this is what gets the DNC to start helping candidates then I'm cool with it.", ">>{neptunedragon} : Haven't been this hyped when the mega powers formed.", ">>{PopcornInMyTeeth} : I'm not. Looks like we're back to 0.", ">>{Endorn} : It's not though. People liked Bernie for his platform not for his amazing charisma (lol). Propping him up beside Perez isn't going to help anything if Perez isn't going to adopt his platform.", '>>{eggpIant} : This is just what politics is. Bernie understands progressive change is going to come through the Democratic party before anywhere else right now', '>>{IbanezDavy} : There are definitely house seats to win. Unity is needed before that can happen. Otherwise and already uphill battle will be even more steeper. That being said, most of the unity problems are definitely coming from the establishment side of things.', ">>{IbanezDavy} : > Propping him up beside Perez isn't going to help anything if Perez isn't going to adopt his platform. Yup. Lip service only goes so far.", ">>{Endorn} : It's not though. The party just voted to make taking lobbying money a permanent thing. The party is moving less progressive not more progressive. Standing up beside Perez isn't going to help that, its giving away his one bargaining chip (his following) for what? Nothing.", ">>{Endorn} : What good is propping Bernie up beside Perez going to do if Perez doesn't adopt Bernie's policies? None. Perez is trying to trick people into thinking he supports Bernie's platform by having Bernie stand beside him. It's gross.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : > Sanders having acts of good will with the DNC (and vice versa!) is an important step of mending the perceived rift between progressives and the DNC. Make no mistake about it. There is no *perceived* rift. There's a rift. People need to stop denying this.", ">>{Endorn} : So instead of *actually* moving left let's just prop up Bernie as a puppet on stage beside Perez and see if we can trick people.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : I agree full heartedly. However, if more republicans get elected, it's going to get worse before it gets better. The proper place to battle the establishment democrats is during the primary (and they hate this idea more than anything). See [Justice Democrats] (https://justicedemocrats.com/)", ">>{kyonu} : > EDIT: And of course this gets down-voted (eye roll) I'm not gonna say CTR because I am not sure if they are even funded anymore, but there's a ton of Hillary apologists on Reddit still. They swarm r/politics harder than anyone else.", '>>{d_mcc_x} : Oh Jesus. Seriously with this still? The entire party platform in 2016 was modified to incorporate multiple Bernie points. There has never been a more progressive platform than the DNC platform for the 2016 election.', ">>{Gungading} : I don't really think he's a mascot. He was on message the entire campaign and continues to be.", '>>{d_mcc_x} : Both sides need to concede a little bit. Not just centrists.', ">>{kyonu} : >What good is propping Bernie up beside Perez going to do if Perez doesn't adopt Bernie's policies? Because it gives Bernie the money for him to travel around and spreading his message. Perez will use the opporunity for himself, but Bernie needs to take any action he can to get the money/recognition of the progressive agenda.", ">>{LazamairAMD} : I'm glad to see unity is finally returning to the Democratic Party. But let's not get ahead of ourselves just yet. There are 3 special elections for house seats in the coming days and weeks...in deep red districts...and the Democrat nominee for these elections are in very competitive positions to possibly win. Their victories would give the DNC some better idea on the platform to build that can get them large gains in 2018. I, for one, would love to see more Bernie-esque progressive ideology in there.", ">>{eggpIant} : There is definitely progressive influence coming into the party. You aren't going to get everything you want overnight. And what is the alternative? A new party? Good luck with that one", '>>{DeadTrumps} : No, I just said they need to move left.', ">>{MagicComa106} : Really? Last I checked it was the centrists that have been in control of the party over the last decade and have seen a record number of lost seats. It wasn't progressives calling the shots.", ">>{Endorn} : Yeah but what they're actually doing is what I said", ">>{BadDecisionDino} : Progressives need to get beyond Sanders at this point. He's a good guy, but so was Obama when he spent 8 years getting repeatedly lured in by the false promise of compromise with the GOP. The Democrats are basically doing the same thing to Sanders that the GOP did to Obama - cynical opportunists taking advantage of a reasonable man who believes that if he tries hard enough, he can eventually break through and appeal to their better natures.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : Seeing how the centrists have full control of the party, and there are still progressives hanging around, I think stuff has been conceded. If this is the way the establishment democrats want things, then more of the burden is going to be shifted on to them. If Bernie Sanders, Kieth Ellison and some progressive from the house were the DNC chair and minority leaders, I'd expect the same from them towards rank and file democrats. The way I see it is that 55% of the party voted for Clinton around 45% voted for Sanders. They agree on about 80% so set that aside. The remaining 20% should be taken close to equally from the progressive wing and the centrist wing, with a slight bias towards the centrist wing. But only a slight. I've seen very little adoption of that mentality from the establishment democrats. It's business as usual with painting all things Russia and Trump as the boogie man. There's a lot of mending to be done. But I just don't think the progressive wing really has most of the burden given who is in more control.", ">>{Endorn} : Name one policy of Perez that's been I progressively influenced? Hell, name one new Perez policy period. All I've heard the guy say is BS about leading with our values and being a grass roots party.", '>>{Endorn} : By standing beside the leader of a party that just voted to make taking lobbyist money permanent?', ">>{MagicComa106} : How are simple words any more substantiated? Unfortunately we'll never know how much of that platform President Clinton would have followed but it certainly isn't anything more than lip service.", '>>{Endorn} : So that makes it ok for Perez to start making it less progressive?', '>>{IbanezDavy} : Sure lets double down. That seems to work for Trump no matter how wrong it is.', '>>{kyonu} : You work with what you have. The more people that know about a progressive campaign, the more people that will vote for it. Perez is giving him that opportunity while looking like a "unifier". In the long run, his policy will fail while Bernie\'s will succeed. It\'s a necessary evil, and I think Bernie knows that.', '>>{IbanezDavy} : The solution to your problems lie with the [Justice Democrats] (https://justicedemocrats.com/)', ">>{eggpIant} : Well parties change with voters over time. If the voters are there, the Dems can only look away for so long. Don't forget you are not alone here. Republicans just got in line to elect a lunatic because he has the R next to his name. Progressives really don't have the luxury of standing on an island here", ">>{Matthmaroo} : Sigh.... If Bernie can get over it ... so can you He's going To be running as a democrat in 2020 , we all have to grow the fuck up and move on", ">>{Endorn} : Why would the party change if everyone keeps voting Dems because republicans are monsters? In fact that's best case scenario for the DNC, they get to keep moving right and taking corporate money and the Dems have to keep voting dem because you've all convinced yourselves that you have no choice.", ">>{eggpIant} : You really don't have much of a choice if you are being honest with yourself. Vote for people that you want to see change the party. The battle is in the primaries and 2018. This is just the cold hard reality of what politics is right now. Starting a new party is a pipe dream. And don't pretend America is one giant progressive pool waiting to vote. It's not. It has always been a conservative nation. The dems are right to care about centrist because there are a lot of them and they vote.", '>>{Endorn} : Maybe. But what you see here is an attempt to get RIGHT WING (red and purple) voters to vote democratic. They are blatantly telling you the party is going to nove right not left. And they will continue to do until the left wing stops voting for them out of fear of Republicans.', '>>{pktron} : What concessions can/should they make? The platform completely caved to progressives for the 2016 elections.', ">>{PopcornInMyTeeth} : Because I trust Bernie. We all liked his vote for the Iraq war, but this, like his decision to back Hillary seems to ruffle people's feathers. If Perez was going out alone, it's one thing, but Bernie's signing on and based on his past decisions, I see that as a good thing. Plus, any type of unity against the Republicans and Trump is a good thing."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{pktron} : This is a very good move. Sanders having acts of good will with the DNC (and vice versa!) is an important step of mending the perceived rift between progressives and the DNC. The Sanders campaign never felt remotely as wronged by the actions of the DNC as many of his supporters felt, but that is still a point that needs to be healed.', '>>{DeadTrumps} : This is a good thing. DNC needs to move left and get grassroots support and Bernie needs to help convince his people to unite with the DNC.', ">>{Endorn} : Because Bernie shouldn't be touring with Perez until Perez lays out a progressive agenda. I'm disappointed in Bernie.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : Unity is badly needed. But I have to say, establishment democrats and those that support them, need to concede to their progressive friends a little bit and that will eliminate a lot of the negativity. The democrats are still very divided. As evident by any post posted here with Clinton in the title (half or more of the comment chains get collapsed from downvotes). Glad to see this, but words only go so far. Make sure to actually back up the lip service with actions on occasions. That's the quickest path to mending wounds. That's what speaks to the progressive voter more than anything. And so far the three people put into leadership (thus the three opportunities democrats have had to include the progressive wing more into the leadership) have been disappointing. Sanders seems like a mascot the democrats wield more than anything. Let's make sure as a community that some of his ideas actually get some of the backing of the DNC. EDIT: And of course this gets down-voted (eye roll)", ">>{6heismans} : He also basically supported the Syrian attack. Not a great week for him. Although I don't have huge issue with the tour. Perez still needs to make a lot of changes. But there are seats to win right now and If this is what gets the DNC to start helping candidates then I'm cool with it.", ">>{neptunedragon} : Haven't been this hyped when the mega powers formed.", ">>{PopcornInMyTeeth} : I'm not. Looks like we're back to 0.", ">>{Endorn} : It's not though. People liked Bernie for his platform not for his amazing charisma (lol). Propping him up beside Perez isn't going to help anything if Perez isn't going to adopt his platform.", '>>{eggpIant} : This is just what politics is. Bernie understands progressive change is going to come through the Democratic party before anywhere else right now', '>>{IbanezDavy} : There are definitely house seats to win. Unity is needed before that can happen. Otherwise and already uphill battle will be even more steeper. That being said, most of the unity problems are definitely coming from the establishment side of things.', ">>{IbanezDavy} : > Propping him up beside Perez isn't going to help anything if Perez isn't going to adopt his platform. Yup. Lip service only goes so far.", ">>{Endorn} : It's not though. The party just voted to make taking lobbying money a permanent thing. The party is moving less progressive not more progressive. Standing up beside Perez isn't going to help that, its giving away his one bargaining chip (his following) for what? Nothing.", ">>{Endorn} : What good is propping Bernie up beside Perez going to do if Perez doesn't adopt Bernie's policies? None. Perez is trying to trick people into thinking he supports Bernie's platform by having Bernie stand beside him. It's gross.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : > Sanders having acts of good will with the DNC (and vice versa!) is an important step of mending the perceived rift between progressives and the DNC. Make no mistake about it. There is no *perceived* rift. There's a rift. People need to stop denying this.", ">>{Endorn} : So instead of *actually* moving left let's just prop up Bernie as a puppet on stage beside Perez and see if we can trick people.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : I agree full heartedly. However, if more republicans get elected, it's going to get worse before it gets better. The proper place to battle the establishment democrats is during the primary (and they hate this idea more than anything). See [Justice Democrats] (https://justicedemocrats.com/)", ">>{kyonu} : > EDIT: And of course this gets down-voted (eye roll) I'm not gonna say CTR because I am not sure if they are even funded anymore, but there's a ton of Hillary apologists on Reddit still. They swarm r/politics harder than anyone else.", '>>{d_mcc_x} : Oh Jesus. Seriously with this still? The entire party platform in 2016 was modified to incorporate multiple Bernie points. There has never been a more progressive platform than the DNC platform for the 2016 election.', ">>{Gungading} : I don't really think he's a mascot. He was on message the entire campaign and continues to be.", '>>{d_mcc_x} : Both sides need to concede a little bit. Not just centrists.', ">>{kyonu} : >What good is propping Bernie up beside Perez going to do if Perez doesn't adopt Bernie's policies? Because it gives Bernie the money for him to travel around and spreading his message. Perez will use the opporunity for himself, but Bernie needs to take any action he can to get the money/recognition of the progressive agenda.", ">>{LazamairAMD} : I'm glad to see unity is finally returning to the Democratic Party. But let's not get ahead of ourselves just yet. There are 3 special elections for house seats in the coming days and weeks...in deep red districts...and the Democrat nominee for these elections are in very competitive positions to possibly win. Their victories would give the DNC some better idea on the platform to build that can get them large gains in 2018. I, for one, would love to see more Bernie-esque progressive ideology in there.", ">>{eggpIant} : There is definitely progressive influence coming into the party. You aren't going to get everything you want overnight. And what is the alternative? A new party? Good luck with that one", '>>{DeadTrumps} : No, I just said they need to move left.', ">>{MagicComa106} : Really? Last I checked it was the centrists that have been in control of the party over the last decade and have seen a record number of lost seats. It wasn't progressives calling the shots.", ">>{Endorn} : Yeah but what they're actually doing is what I said", ">>{BadDecisionDino} : Progressives need to get beyond Sanders at this point. He's a good guy, but so was Obama when he spent 8 years getting repeatedly lured in by the false promise of compromise with the GOP. The Democrats are basically doing the same thing to Sanders that the GOP did to Obama - cynical opportunists taking advantage of a reasonable man who believes that if he tries hard enough, he can eventually break through and appeal to their better natures.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : Seeing how the centrists have full control of the party, and there are still progressives hanging around, I think stuff has been conceded. If this is the way the establishment democrats want things, then more of the burden is going to be shifted on to them. If Bernie Sanders, Kieth Ellison and some progressive from the house were the DNC chair and minority leaders, I'd expect the same from them towards rank and file democrats. The way I see it is that 55% of the party voted for Clinton around 45% voted for Sanders. They agree on about 80% so set that aside. The remaining 20% should be taken close to equally from the progressive wing and the centrist wing, with a slight bias towards the centrist wing. But only a slight. I've seen very little adoption of that mentality from the establishment democrats. It's business as usual with painting all things Russia and Trump as the boogie man. There's a lot of mending to be done. But I just don't think the progressive wing really has most of the burden given who is in more control.", ">>{Endorn} : Name one policy of Perez that's been I progressively influenced? Hell, name one new Perez policy period. All I've heard the guy say is BS about leading with our values and being a grass roots party.", '>>{Endorn} : By standing beside the leader of a party that just voted to make taking lobbyist money permanent?', ">>{MagicComa106} : How are simple words any more substantiated? Unfortunately we'll never know how much of that platform President Clinton would have followed but it certainly isn't anything more than lip service.", '>>{Endorn} : So that makes it ok for Perez to start making it less progressive?', '>>{IbanezDavy} : Sure lets double down. That seems to work for Trump no matter how wrong it is.', '>>{kyonu} : You work with what you have. The more people that know about a progressive campaign, the more people that will vote for it. Perez is giving him that opportunity while looking like a "unifier". In the long run, his policy will fail while Bernie\'s will succeed. It\'s a necessary evil, and I think Bernie knows that.', '>>{IbanezDavy} : The solution to your problems lie with the [Justice Democrats] (https://justicedemocrats.com/)', ">>{eggpIant} : Well parties change with voters over time. If the voters are there, the Dems can only look away for so long. Don't forget you are not alone here. Republicans just got in line to elect a lunatic because he has the R next to his name. Progressives really don't have the luxury of standing on an island here", ">>{Matthmaroo} : Sigh.... If Bernie can get over it ... so can you He's going To be running as a democrat in 2020 , we all have to grow the fuck up and move on", ">>{Endorn} : Why would the party change if everyone keeps voting Dems because republicans are monsters? In fact that's best case scenario for the DNC, they get to keep moving right and taking corporate money and the Dems have to keep voting dem because you've all convinced yourselves that you have no choice.", ">>{eggpIant} : You really don't have much of a choice if you are being honest with yourself. Vote for people that you want to see change the party. The battle is in the primaries and 2018. This is just the cold hard reality of what politics is right now. Starting a new party is a pipe dream. And don't pretend America is one giant progressive pool waiting to vote. It's not. It has always been a conservative nation. The dems are right to care about centrist because there are a lot of them and they vote.", '>>{Endorn} : Maybe. But what you see here is an attempt to get RIGHT WING (red and purple) voters to vote democratic. They are blatantly telling you the party is going to nove right not left. And they will continue to do until the left wing stops voting for them out of fear of Republicans.', '>>{pktron} : What concessions can/should they make? The platform completely caved to progressives for the 2016 elections.', ">>{PopcornInMyTeeth} : Because I trust Bernie. We all liked his vote for the Iraq war, but this, like his decision to back Hillary seems to ruffle people's feathers. If Perez was going out alone, it's one thing, but Bernie's signing on and based on his past decisions, I see that as a good thing. Plus, any type of unity against the Republicans and Trump is a good thing."]]

classify and reply

['>>{kyonu} : What do you mean "again"? She never stopped. She only said it once that she doesn\'t to shut the media up about it, but hasn\'t said a word since.', ">>{more_sarcasm} : what majority of Americans? most people, especially those I've spoken with about it either don't know what the TTP is, or don't care... where exactly did they poll people?", ">>{Classy_Dolphin} : TPP is likely to live or die in the lame duck. I think most people understand that free trade is necessary, inevitable, and positive in general - there are just some concerns about how TPP could empower corporations to take some powers from sovereign states or lower health, safety, and environmental standards. I don't know how much of a problem that is with TPP - or indeed if it is; most of the deal is still secret - but it's pretty clear that an FTA with smaller Asia-pacific nations is a positive step in general, as long as the benefits can be reallocated to displaced workers in some way. Creative destruction is necessary, but government *can* protect people who suffer from the destruction part through no fault of their own.", ">>{mr_shortypants} : I actually support the TPP. It'll probably be fully approved in the lame duck session, but I hope it does go through.", '>>{dkliberator} : Good thing nothing will be done about it in the near future.', '>>{shitpersonality} : She has flipped her stance. Now we are waiting for the flop.', '>>{10390} : The TPP isn\'t about "free trade", it\'s about protecting the profits of international companies at the expense of local businesses and labor/environmental protections via special courts: "this court is so powerful that nations often must heed its rulings as if they came from their own supreme courts, with no meaningful way to appeal. That it operates unconstrained by precedent or any significant public oversight, often keeping its proceedings and sometimes even its decisions secret. That the people who decide its cases are largely elite Western corporate attorneys who have a vested interest in expanding the court’s authority because they profit from it directly, arguing cases one day and then sitting in judgment another." https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrishamby/super-court?utm_term=.uyJL63V21#.qaPOzEy4R', '>>{CTR_Disinfo_Agent} : Yeah, I would have preferred a slight renegotiation, but if Obama and the Republican congress can pass it, I say go for it. Let them take the PR hit.', ">>{I_Key_Cars} : If Trump hates it, it can't be all bad.", ">>{Dingus-ate-your-baby} : I think this is a wedge issue. Globalism is going to find a way. We're way too connected now for it not to. If it's not the TPP or H1Bs it'll be something else, sooner or later. I'm thinking this is going to be an unpopular view on Reddit, so be it, it's how I feel.", ">>{I_Key_Cars} : I trust Obama more than any other politician that's against it.", '>>{nphased} : Yes see also: https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/05/trans-pacific-partnership-obama-fast-track-nafta/ From the article >The overriding purpose of the TPP and similar deals is to shrink the power of governments to regulate in the public interest, expand the range and scope of capital accumulation, pillage and patent the commons, and narrow the scope for democratic political action.', '>>{10390} : From the survey linked in the article that is the basis for their conclusion: "Two out of three (65%) Americans say that globalization, especially the increasing connections of our economy with others around the world, is mostly good for the United States (compared to 34% who say that it is mostly bad)" People like globalization, that\'s not the same as saying that the TPP is good. Many think that it\'s not. Buzzfeed of all places is doing an indepth series on it. This one about the courts is imho worth reading: https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrishamby/super-court?utm_term=.riL13zGbM#.ui53Jx8BP', ">>{UvonTheTerrible} : I'm suspicious of any poll that doesn't release full results, including all of the questions, like this one.", '>>{y4udothat} : > Buzzfeed of all places I don\'t think there\'s any overlap between Buzzfeed\'s clickbait dept and Buzzfeed news. So it\'s not like the "6 Things You\'ll Only Get If You\'re a 90\'s Kid" author is interviewing politicians on the side. I think it\'s all professionals there.', ">>{TOMapleLaughs} : It's been too overblown for too long to it not be a just a mere talking point now. A wedge issue. The reality with this, brexit, and other trade agreements is that even if one is voted down, a half-dozen others will replace it. There's just too much overwhelming desire to globalize. As soon as the internet was invented, globalization was inevitable, and it starts with the global economy, which is now almost impossible to remove ones self from. It is funny watching certain parties promote anti-globalism over the internet though.", ">>{odanedu} : No we don't, We have not been able to know anything about it. It's top secret. How could we possibly approve of something that we know nothing about?", ">>{bigfootplays} : [The full text was released last November.](http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/05/politics/tpp-text-released/index.html) [It can be read here](https://medium.com/the-trans-pacific-partnership). It doesn't really shock me that someone who's anti-TPP is ignorant to the reality of it.", '>>{10390} : You must be right, this is professional-grade reporting.', ">>{theplott} : You shouldn't. It a very bad trade agreement.", '>>{odanedu} : The reality is a bunch of corporate lawyers got together with a bunch of political leaders and are working to make money, shitloads of money, for their respective companies and themselves by manipulating current trade laws to their advantage. Am I close?', ">>{theplott} : Sure, but shouldn't we get a say in how that globalization happens? TPP allows Big Pharma, for instance, to shut down all generic drug factories in Australia and Vietnam because our government extended the IP laws so Big Pharma can enforce their pricing all over the TPP area. The labor and environmental protections inside TPP are more like suggestions. The reality is that if a country tries to shut down an Big Corp for polluting the environment, that country can and will be sued for lost profits. TPP is a terrible trade deal. If the effect of globalization is secret courts and Big Corp being able to overcome all the laws of nations, then why do we have to welcome THAT?", '>>{odanedu} : Sooo, what your saying is that no lawyers were involved in writing it and no politicians have to vote for it? Who the fuck is your world dictator?', ">>{an_alphas_opinion} : Who is trading free? Japan? LOL. China? LOL. Mexico? LOL. All of the above are using tariffs and currency manipulation to develop a trade advantage. The US gives up the trade advantage for 'allies'. That's right, the US is giving up your job for some BS political chess game with Russia and China. You should be very mad.", ">>{an_alphas_opinion} : Japan is both globalist and protectionist. Christ, just because we have the internet doesn't mean we should ship all our manufacturing jobs to Vietnam. You can be both.", ">>{bigfootplays} : That's a loaded question. Try again, and this time at least pretend you're an adult.", '>>{theplott} : There are plenty of links down post, if you are interested in why TPP is a horrible trade agreement. It will destroy the cheaper drug markets of smaller countries as well has many other of their small businesses in order to force them into US pricing and Big Corp interests. There are no enforceable labor or environmental protections in TPP, merely suggestions, and after signing TPP individual countries cannot punish or prohibit environmental devastation by individual countries without getting sued for "loss of profits." TPP should not be passed until there is a comprehensive safety net inside the USA for the many many people who will lose their jobs to foreign workers (who don\'t carry our college debt so they can work much cheaper, as well as not having to prove their competence for employment.) The USA will be left with chasing this illusive dream of ours while the mega-fortunes of Wall Street are made off our struggles. We will continue to lose while being forced to participate in the heavy monetization of every facet of our lives so Big Corp can demand payment for as much to nothing as they can possibly provide. With our current lack of any public influence on government, treaties like TPP will force us to compete with slave laborers in Malaysia and child workers in Vietnam for anything that barely resembles a job. Worse still, the white collar jobs have already started to disappear here in the USA. Engineers, architects, graphic design, sound and video engineering, accounting, record keeping, investment by algorithm...and we simply cannot compete because of our soaring healthcare and educational costs. To participate in globalization, we first have to build a system here that focuses on our own health, our own safety standards, and our own requirements as a society that don\'t get buried to make Wall Street profitable and liquid.', ">>{odanedu} : Ok. You still must not get it. Lawyers, Businesses need them. they need them to insure that the daily business is done in a lawful manner, so in order to complete a trade agreement with any other business or nation. Politicians, we have them and so does every nation in the world. No trade agreement can ever happen without them. Money, that's right the big giant elephant in the room. Did you know that businesses like money. Lawyers love money. Politicians just cannot control themselves around it. Every body wants to make money, so the business hires a lawyer, the lawyer writes the agreement and then consults the lawyers for other companies and organisations and finally drafts what would be some treaty between nations and corporations. Then the politicians come into play. Having been sponsored by multinational corporations american politicians get in line and those who are slow to get on board are lobbied by these corporations and legal firms representing them to sway their (the politicians) vote. After all that then it will go to the president to sign into law. Meanwhile the contents of the legislation goes without seeing the light of day for public discussion, (this insures that that annoying public won't cause any problems). By the time the public see's what is happening it's too late and the only jobs left are at Walmart and McDonalds.", ">>{LeftousCrusader} : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Push_poll > A push poll is an interactive marketing technique, most commonly employed during political campaigning, in which an individual or organization attempts to manipulate or alter prospective voters' views/beliefs under the guise of conducting an opinion poll. Anyway, this spin from that source means we're winning. When it starts coming from WaPo/NYT/etc it means we're winning big. When it hits TV we've won.", ">>{LeftousCrusader} : If you're willing to believe that headline then you're definitely in an echo chamber.", '>>{Dingus-ate-your-baby} : I think that\'s a reasonable criticism of this particular agreement. I guess I just don\'t agree with the sentiment that one can be "anti-globalist" generally speaking. While we can certainly still decide the terms with which we reach financial accords intercontinentally, this idea that we\'re going to go back to the economy of nations is as done as the flat earth society.', ">>{Dingus-ate-your-baby} : Given the level of automation, isn't deciding which countries have the manufacturing jobs essentially just shuffling the deck chairs?", '>>{an_alphas_opinion} : Look at our real wage growth for your answer. (It hasn\'t gone up in over a decade). The reality is, too, you can have both. Japan both has a boisterous steel industry and top of the line tech companies. There are pretty simple tariffs and protections we can put in place that will help make us more competitive. Reagan saving the Harley\'s and Hillarys "coal miner plan" are two examples. The truth of it is we let other countries have our industries so we can leverage them in foreign policy cold wars. That\'s sad and wrong.', ">>{theplott} : I think the point is that TPP will give us none of the benefits of globalization and free markets (letting us buy our Epipens much more cheaply from Australia) while cementing all the benefits for Big Corp while we pay for all the inherent risk. If we can't maintain our safety standards, our standard of living, our food standards, our quality controls, then there doesn't seem much point in TPP unless we want to give all controls over the Wall Street and Big Corp.", ">>{bigfootplays} : The public has seen it for 10 months and counting, and Congress hasn't even voted on it yet, so your point is moot.", ">>{Dingus-ate-your-baby} : So it's not so much the principle of globalization that bothers you with respect to the TPP, but corporatization? I'll buy that.", ">>{Dingus-ate-your-baby} : I think the issue with respect to manufacturing isn't so much looking BACK, but looking FORWARD. I don't think these jobs are coming back to human beings, and as we get further down the pike, it's going to be less and less important which nations the few that are left are located.", ">>{an_alphas_opinion} : I mean, Detroit is in ruins. Are we talking decades? Years? Many Americans have shitty service and retail jobs at Wal-Mart moving all this imported crap, rather than making it. They're hungry now. I don't think the outsourcing is just limited to manufacturing either. Look at Disney and their H1B1 BS.", ">>{shoriu} : I dont think most americans even know what the TPP is much less the implications of it. And I'm not being a dick to the people. The subject just isnt simple and not well discussed in the media.", ">>{Finkelton} : ....Bull shit. I'd be amazed if the majority in this country could even tell me what TPP stood for. let alone what is in it, what it does, who and what it impacts.", ">>{Dingus-ate-your-baby} : I don't know what to tell you. The people are out there, they are aware of the jobs, their salary demand shows return for the work product, and the companies have the revenue to make it work. If it's not H1Bs, it's tax codes allowing them to headquarter in another country. This is just going to happen.", '>>{I_Key_Cars} : These look like biased sources. Where can I read the actual document?', '>>{EllaPrvi_Real} : The American public gets information from the American media which is controlled by multinational corporations and if the media say TPP is good it means it is good for corporations, and so far it was proven what is good for corporations it is not good for the people.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{kyonu} : What do you mean "again"? She never stopped. She only said it once that she doesn\'t to shut the media up about it, but hasn\'t said a word since.', ">>{more_sarcasm} : what majority of Americans? most people, especially those I've spoken with about it either don't know what the TTP is, or don't care... where exactly did they poll people?", ">>{Classy_Dolphin} : TPP is likely to live or die in the lame duck. I think most people understand that free trade is necessary, inevitable, and positive in general - there are just some concerns about how TPP could empower corporations to take some powers from sovereign states or lower health, safety, and environmental standards. I don't know how much of a problem that is with TPP - or indeed if it is; most of the deal is still secret - but it's pretty clear that an FTA with smaller Asia-pacific nations is a positive step in general, as long as the benefits can be reallocated to displaced workers in some way. Creative destruction is necessary, but government *can* protect people who suffer from the destruction part through no fault of their own.", ">>{mr_shortypants} : I actually support the TPP. It'll probably be fully approved in the lame duck session, but I hope it does go through.", '>>{dkliberator} : Good thing nothing will be done about it in the near future.', '>>{shitpersonality} : She has flipped her stance. Now we are waiting for the flop.', '>>{10390} : The TPP isn\'t about "free trade", it\'s about protecting the profits of international companies at the expense of local businesses and labor/environmental protections via special courts: "this court is so powerful that nations often must heed its rulings as if they came from their own supreme courts, with no meaningful way to appeal. That it operates unconstrained by precedent or any significant public oversight, often keeping its proceedings and sometimes even its decisions secret. That the people who decide its cases are largely elite Western corporate attorneys who have a vested interest in expanding the court’s authority because they profit from it directly, arguing cases one day and then sitting in judgment another." https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrishamby/super-court?utm_term=.uyJL63V21#.qaPOzEy4R', '>>{CTR_Disinfo_Agent} : Yeah, I would have preferred a slight renegotiation, but if Obama and the Republican congress can pass it, I say go for it. Let them take the PR hit.', ">>{I_Key_Cars} : If Trump hates it, it can't be all bad.", ">>{Dingus-ate-your-baby} : I think this is a wedge issue. Globalism is going to find a way. We're way too connected now for it not to. If it's not the TPP or H1Bs it'll be something else, sooner or later. I'm thinking this is going to be an unpopular view on Reddit, so be it, it's how I feel.", ">>{I_Key_Cars} : I trust Obama more than any other politician that's against it.", '>>{nphased} : Yes see also: https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/05/trans-pacific-partnership-obama-fast-track-nafta/ From the article >The overriding purpose of the TPP and similar deals is to shrink the power of governments to regulate in the public interest, expand the range and scope of capital accumulation, pillage and patent the commons, and narrow the scope for democratic political action.', '>>{10390} : From the survey linked in the article that is the basis for their conclusion: "Two out of three (65%) Americans say that globalization, especially the increasing connections of our economy with others around the world, is mostly good for the United States (compared to 34% who say that it is mostly bad)" People like globalization, that\'s not the same as saying that the TPP is good. Many think that it\'s not. Buzzfeed of all places is doing an indepth series on it. This one about the courts is imho worth reading: https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrishamby/super-court?utm_term=.riL13zGbM#.ui53Jx8BP', ">>{UvonTheTerrible} : I'm suspicious of any poll that doesn't release full results, including all of the questions, like this one.", '>>{y4udothat} : > Buzzfeed of all places I don\'t think there\'s any overlap between Buzzfeed\'s clickbait dept and Buzzfeed news. So it\'s not like the "6 Things You\'ll Only Get If You\'re a 90\'s Kid" author is interviewing politicians on the side. I think it\'s all professionals there.', ">>{TOMapleLaughs} : It's been too overblown for too long to it not be a just a mere talking point now. A wedge issue. The reality with this, brexit, and other trade agreements is that even if one is voted down, a half-dozen others will replace it. There's just too much overwhelming desire to globalize. As soon as the internet was invented, globalization was inevitable, and it starts with the global economy, which is now almost impossible to remove ones self from. It is funny watching certain parties promote anti-globalism over the internet though.", ">>{odanedu} : No we don't, We have not been able to know anything about it. It's top secret. How could we possibly approve of something that we know nothing about?", ">>{bigfootplays} : [The full text was released last November.](http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/05/politics/tpp-text-released/index.html) [It can be read here](https://medium.com/the-trans-pacific-partnership). It doesn't really shock me that someone who's anti-TPP is ignorant to the reality of it.", '>>{10390} : You must be right, this is professional-grade reporting.', ">>{theplott} : You shouldn't. It a very bad trade agreement.", '>>{odanedu} : The reality is a bunch of corporate lawyers got together with a bunch of political leaders and are working to make money, shitloads of money, for their respective companies and themselves by manipulating current trade laws to their advantage. Am I close?', ">>{theplott} : Sure, but shouldn't we get a say in how that globalization happens? TPP allows Big Pharma, for instance, to shut down all generic drug factories in Australia and Vietnam because our government extended the IP laws so Big Pharma can enforce their pricing all over the TPP area. The labor and environmental protections inside TPP are more like suggestions. The reality is that if a country tries to shut down an Big Corp for polluting the environment, that country can and will be sued for lost profits. TPP is a terrible trade deal. If the effect of globalization is secret courts and Big Corp being able to overcome all the laws of nations, then why do we have to welcome THAT?", '>>{odanedu} : Sooo, what your saying is that no lawyers were involved in writing it and no politicians have to vote for it? Who the fuck is your world dictator?', ">>{an_alphas_opinion} : Who is trading free? Japan? LOL. China? LOL. Mexico? LOL. All of the above are using tariffs and currency manipulation to develop a trade advantage. The US gives up the trade advantage for 'allies'. That's right, the US is giving up your job for some BS political chess game with Russia and China. You should be very mad.", ">>{an_alphas_opinion} : Japan is both globalist and protectionist. Christ, just because we have the internet doesn't mean we should ship all our manufacturing jobs to Vietnam. You can be both.", ">>{bigfootplays} : That's a loaded question. Try again, and this time at least pretend you're an adult.", '>>{theplott} : There are plenty of links down post, if you are interested in why TPP is a horrible trade agreement. It will destroy the cheaper drug markets of smaller countries as well has many other of their small businesses in order to force them into US pricing and Big Corp interests. There are no enforceable labor or environmental protections in TPP, merely suggestions, and after signing TPP individual countries cannot punish or prohibit environmental devastation by individual countries without getting sued for "loss of profits." TPP should not be passed until there is a comprehensive safety net inside the USA for the many many people who will lose their jobs to foreign workers (who don\'t carry our college debt so they can work much cheaper, as well as not having to prove their competence for employment.) The USA will be left with chasing this illusive dream of ours while the mega-fortunes of Wall Street are made off our struggles. We will continue to lose while being forced to participate in the heavy monetization of every facet of our lives so Big Corp can demand payment for as much to nothing as they can possibly provide. With our current lack of any public influence on government, treaties like TPP will force us to compete with slave laborers in Malaysia and child workers in Vietnam for anything that barely resembles a job. Worse still, the white collar jobs have already started to disappear here in the USA. Engineers, architects, graphic design, sound and video engineering, accounting, record keeping, investment by algorithm...and we simply cannot compete because of our soaring healthcare and educational costs. To participate in globalization, we first have to build a system here that focuses on our own health, our own safety standards, and our own requirements as a society that don\'t get buried to make Wall Street profitable and liquid.', ">>{odanedu} : Ok. You still must not get it. Lawyers, Businesses need them. they need them to insure that the daily business is done in a lawful manner, so in order to complete a trade agreement with any other business or nation. Politicians, we have them and so does every nation in the world. No trade agreement can ever happen without them. Money, that's right the big giant elephant in the room. Did you know that businesses like money. Lawyers love money. Politicians just cannot control themselves around it. Every body wants to make money, so the business hires a lawyer, the lawyer writes the agreement and then consults the lawyers for other companies and organisations and finally drafts what would be some treaty between nations and corporations. Then the politicians come into play. Having been sponsored by multinational corporations american politicians get in line and those who are slow to get on board are lobbied by these corporations and legal firms representing them to sway their (the politicians) vote. After all that then it will go to the president to sign into law. Meanwhile the contents of the legislation goes without seeing the light of day for public discussion, (this insures that that annoying public won't cause any problems). By the time the public see's what is happening it's too late and the only jobs left are at Walmart and McDonalds.", ">>{LeftousCrusader} : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Push_poll > A push poll is an interactive marketing technique, most commonly employed during political campaigning, in which an individual or organization attempts to manipulate or alter prospective voters' views/beliefs under the guise of conducting an opinion poll. Anyway, this spin from that source means we're winning. When it starts coming from WaPo/NYT/etc it means we're winning big. When it hits TV we've won.", ">>{LeftousCrusader} : If you're willing to believe that headline then you're definitely in an echo chamber.", '>>{Dingus-ate-your-baby} : I think that\'s a reasonable criticism of this particular agreement. I guess I just don\'t agree with the sentiment that one can be "anti-globalist" generally speaking. While we can certainly still decide the terms with which we reach financial accords intercontinentally, this idea that we\'re going to go back to the economy of nations is as done as the flat earth society.', ">>{Dingus-ate-your-baby} : Given the level of automation, isn't deciding which countries have the manufacturing jobs essentially just shuffling the deck chairs?", '>>{an_alphas_opinion} : Look at our real wage growth for your answer. (It hasn\'t gone up in over a decade). The reality is, too, you can have both. Japan both has a boisterous steel industry and top of the line tech companies. There are pretty simple tariffs and protections we can put in place that will help make us more competitive. Reagan saving the Harley\'s and Hillarys "coal miner plan" are two examples. The truth of it is we let other countries have our industries so we can leverage them in foreign policy cold wars. That\'s sad and wrong.', ">>{theplott} : I think the point is that TPP will give us none of the benefits of globalization and free markets (letting us buy our Epipens much more cheaply from Australia) while cementing all the benefits for Big Corp while we pay for all the inherent risk. If we can't maintain our safety standards, our standard of living, our food standards, our quality controls, then there doesn't seem much point in TPP unless we want to give all controls over the Wall Street and Big Corp.", ">>{bigfootplays} : The public has seen it for 10 months and counting, and Congress hasn't even voted on it yet, so your point is moot.", ">>{Dingus-ate-your-baby} : So it's not so much the principle of globalization that bothers you with respect to the TPP, but corporatization? I'll buy that.", ">>{Dingus-ate-your-baby} : I think the issue with respect to manufacturing isn't so much looking BACK, but looking FORWARD. I don't think these jobs are coming back to human beings, and as we get further down the pike, it's going to be less and less important which nations the few that are left are located.", ">>{an_alphas_opinion} : I mean, Detroit is in ruins. Are we talking decades? Years? Many Americans have shitty service and retail jobs at Wal-Mart moving all this imported crap, rather than making it. They're hungry now. I don't think the outsourcing is just limited to manufacturing either. Look at Disney and their H1B1 BS.", ">>{shoriu} : I dont think most americans even know what the TPP is much less the implications of it. And I'm not being a dick to the people. The subject just isnt simple and not well discussed in the media.", ">>{Finkelton} : ....Bull shit. I'd be amazed if the majority in this country could even tell me what TPP stood for. let alone what is in it, what it does, who and what it impacts.", ">>{Dingus-ate-your-baby} : I don't know what to tell you. The people are out there, they are aware of the jobs, their salary demand shows return for the work product, and the companies have the revenue to make it work. If it's not H1Bs, it's tax codes allowing them to headquarter in another country. This is just going to happen.", '>>{I_Key_Cars} : These look like biased sources. Where can I read the actual document?', '>>{EllaPrvi_Real} : The American public gets information from the American media which is controlled by multinational corporations and if the media say TPP is good it means it is good for corporations, and so far it was proven what is good for corporations it is not good for the people.']]

classify and reply

['>>{KarlMarxIsntDead} : FDR Rejected Anne Frank Twice as a Refugee, Advocate Urges Trump Not to Close U.S. Borders Again', '>>{wholecinnamon} : Elizabeth Warren Slams Donald Trump\'s "Huge Conflicts of Interest"', '>>{President_Tantrump} : “Only Thing We Have to Fear Is Fear Itself” - FDR Scared men should not be allowed to hold positions of power.', '>>{TrumpVotersAre2Blame} : It is easy to give yourself a pass in hindsight and assume if you were in some historical situation you would have done the right thing. Every day we have a choice to do the right thing. As William Faulkner once said "History is not was, it is." As we pass through our own part of history we have to decide which side of the story we want to be on. We all get to decide how those in the future with the gift of hindsight will judge us.', '>>{SarcasticallyAShill} : Anne Frank? An example of somebody who’s done an amazing job and is getting recognized more and more -Donald Trump', ">>{EmpatheticBankRobber} : All Trump knows is that this Anne woman keeps being mean to him. Doesn't she know that he got the most electoral votes ever?", ">>{your_fathers_beard} : Comparing 1940s Jewish refugees to current day Islamic refugees isn't really fair.", ">>{Yodwinder} : Somehow I don't think the anti-semite cares about what happened to Anne Frank.", '>>{your_fathers_beard} : Very different situations. Jew\'s in ww2 were being systematically exterminated by an outside force based on perceived "race". Islamic refugees, by and large, are fleeing internal conflicts between warring factions of their religion in their homeland...', '>>{SantaHickeys} : And what can people who are not soldiers in syria do but flee?', '>>{your_fathers_beard} : If they are fleeing from an actual combat zone, thats one thing. But if they are just leaving the country because \'Hey Im Syrian, I can go to Europe!\' Especially these "Young" men, who don\'t have to prove their age, and are often adult men who are just not married. There is also a major assimilation problem with Islamic refugees, whereas the Jewish refugees of the 30s and 40s were a little better at adapting.', '>>{ChomskysChekist} : Warren lost a lot of respect. The audacity to attack Trump when Clinton is right there.', '>>{Hydrium} : This nobody do nothing senator that has been proven to lie is STILL talking shit?', '>>{DroogDim} : Elizabeth Warren became irrelevant when she failed to endorse Bernard Sanders.', ">>{Venturin} : This is the woman who was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for teaching how many college classes? 1? 2? And she harps on inequality, the 1%'ers and ridiculous college tuition fees? Yea she's a great one to attack other people.", '>>{amaTrex} : Elizabeth Warren is just getting annoying at this point, shes the democrats barking dog', '>>{Stewpid} : Top Ten nicknames for Elizabeth Warren who lied about being a Cherokee Indian for the purpose of stealing an affirmative action teaching position. 10) Dances With Ethics 9) Pinnocchahontas 8) Sitting Bullshit 7) Forked Tongue 6) Poserhantus 5) Hunts at Whole Foods 4) Sackatheeconomy 3) Hiataxa 2) Lie-a-watha 1) Fauxcahontas', ">>{wholecinnamon} : Lie. Charles Fried, Reagan's solicitor general and who was on Harvard's hiring committee at the time, said it was nonsense.", '>>{Louisthefuckenlawyer} : You do see how utterly grotesque you appear running this type of attack yes?', ">>{GarrioValere} : It's funny, every Liberal everywhere was quite adamant that Trump is absolutely despised by the entire Hispanic community. But a conflict of interest because the judge is Hispanic and was active in the Latino community? Ridiculous, racist, etc etc... edit: downvote all you want but we all know the same liberals attacking Trump for saying there might be a conflict of interest would absolutely be saying there was a conflict of interest if the judge were a friend of Trump.", ">>{wholecinnamon} : You might despise someone, but that doesn't mean that you can't act in a professional capacity. Judges might despise serial killers. That doesn't mean there's a conflict of interest when they preside over their trials.", '>>{Anti-Dentite8910} : Warren still needs to do something of worth in her political career before she attacks anyone.', '>>{blatherskiter} : > but that doesn\'t mean that you can\'t act in a professional capacity You mean, like "accidentally" unsealing documents?', ">>{wholecinnamon} : If he was letting his personal hatred of Trump control, he wouldn't have admitted his mistake and tried to reseal them. He allowed himself to look bad for the sake of being a professional.", ">>{GarrioValere} : > Judges might despise serial killers. That doesn't mean there's a conflict of interest. If the judge prejudged the defendant as a serial killer before hearing any evidence, and so despised him from the outset, that would absolutely be a problem. In any case, it's a cause for concern and when you're trying to win a case you look for the best possible scenario, not a judge that already hates you and wants you to burn before hearing any evidence.", '>>{Stewpid} : Her admission questionnaire required her to have proof, beyond subjective belief, that she was a Native American. She could offer no such proof so she intentionally lied in order to secure a teaching position.', '>>{Chief_Mother_Fucker} : I think someone told warren that kids these days like the when people "beef" on twitter so she thinks its "cool". arf arf arf', '>>{MrTrumpsWildRide} : Yeah, far worse than the person who actually *did* those things, is having the gall to call them out for it. What a racist amirite guys?', '>>{Backflip_Wilson} : more like "just baking the wedding cake".', ">>{wholecinnamon} : She did. It's called the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and it's gotten consumers $11 billion back from the banks and credit card companies so far.", '>>{blatherskiter} : How grotesque? Because there was a chief who called Ward Churchill, the 1990s version of Lizzie Warren pretending to be an Indian, "Chief Walking Eagle, because this bird is so full of shit he can\'t fly."', ">>{Louisthefuckenlawyer} : Except that she didn't do those things? Yeah.", '>>{MrTrumpsWildRide} : No, get your facts straight. She was rich from her career as a corporate lawyer, and then she started lying about being an indian on her job application to teach 1 class a week for over 300 thousand per year. I wonder exactly how much of that fraudulent income she contributed towards "her" Cherokee Nation tribe or indian charities.', '>>{blatherskiter} : If he didn\'t "admit" his "mistake" he could have been disbarred. It\'s a gross ethics violation. He didn\'t admit a mistake, he was covering his ass.', '>>{MrTrumpsWildRide} : Yes she did, and she lied about it. http://archive.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2012/05/31/elizabeth_warren_acknowledges_telling_harvard_penn_of_native_american_status/ What a disgusting hypocritical racist. No wonder all these regressive leftists love her so much.', '>>{wholecinnamon} : She didn\'t lie to secure a teaching position because as long-time Republican Charles Fried said, "I can state categorically that the subject of her Native American ancestry never once was mentioned."', '>>{PhilippeCoutinho} : you know the comment is serious when it\'s "Bernard" instead of "Bernie"', '>>{MrTrumpsWildRide} : Yes it does. She claimed to be native, and she is not. Hypocrite, racist, liar, REEEEEEEEEE', '>>{ChomskysChekist} : For the sake of being consistent instead of sounding like a politician.', '>>{GuitarsAndCameras} : Warren: "The job of the President is to enforce the law fairly. If a serial lawbreaker like Deutsche Bank is caught manipulating markets again, how would Trump hold it accountable knowing that the bank had the power to pull the plug on his own businesses? That\'s a question that should worry every American. " Trump: "Pocahontas" "she\'s got a big mouth." One side deals in reality, the other in puerile name calling.', ">>{wholecinnamon} : the re-sealed documents are going to be re-released, only with the personal information redacted. it's not like all the sleazy sales scripts trump U used are not going to be released anyway", '>>{Stewpid} : Her application packet contained questions that required her to answer the following question: http://legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Harvard-HR-2012-2.jpg Notice the Harvard and EEOC requirement to offer more than subjective belief.', '>>{Tony_Killfigure} : Washington corrupts all of them eventually. She lasted longer than most.', '>>{wholecinnamon} : so a single disgruntled employee makes the entire organization worthless?', ">>{Marou_} : Nah, she's the democrat's [War Chief](https://i.sli.mg/gmPTFH.jpg).", '>>{pirate_simon} : Elizabeth Warren, who more or less claims to have grown up in a wigwam, is dealing in reality. This sub loses touch with reality more every minute', '>>{GuitarsAndCameras} : Name calling is not the same as political reality.', '>>{pirate_simon} : You\'re right. How many names has Elizabeth called Donald? "racist" "bigot" "sexist" "bully". When will she learn to put a stop to this baseless name-calling? She\'s throwing shit at the wall and hoping it sticks', '>>{Louisthefuckenlawyer} : Look at my African American Donald Trump.', '>>{pirate_simon} : If I had no argumentative recourse, I would probably also cite a small gaffe where Trump a word', ">>{Louisthefuckenlawyer} : Sure thing buddy. That's what this whole board is these days. Well made arguments for the thought out policies of trump. Gonna be a cruel November for all of you. Best part is you'll all disappear when he loses.", ">>{MrTrumpsWildRide} : Reality Sure, everybody knows reality has a left leaning bias, where white people can be native americans if the *feeeel like it, maaaan*. She's a racist lying hypocrite who fraudulently used the plight of Cherokee people to further her career and political ambition. Fuck her.", ">>{wholecinnamon} : She said she thought she was native-american because that's what her family had told her and believed. A family is a community and it recognized her as such.", ">>{pirate_simon} : I'm a republican who has been in this sub for years. What makes you think I would go away just because the presidential election is over? Unlike most dems, I have a strong understanding of the importance of local elections as well as midterm elections, and we will hand your asses to you in those yet again as well :) Have a nice day", ">>{youareaspastic} : Are you just going to ignore the disparity between Trump and Warren's statements orrrrr...?", ">>{MrTrumpsWildRide} : They're all crooked establishment cronies who deserve to drown too. You think all this Clinton stuff just *suddenly* came as a huge surprise to all of them? They're like the mafia.", ">>{youareaspastic} : Well this statement wasn't made on Twitter but I can see you've been wanting to post that for a while so ok", '>>{GuitarsAndCameras} : Bigotry: "When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending the best. They’re not sending you, they’re sending people that have lots of problems and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bring crime. They’re rapists." Sexist: “All of the women on The Apprentice flirted with me – consciously or unconsciously. That’s to be expected.” Bully: “If I were running ‘The View’, I’d fire Rosie O’Donnell. I mean, I’d look at her right in that fat, ugly face of hers, I’d say ‘Rosie, you’re fired.’” Nothing baseless about what Warren said.', ">>{youareaspastic} : I don't see what that has to do with the article but ok", '>>{pirate_simon} : Ah yes, it\'s always refreshing to see the "trump is literally hitler" argument coming from a senator [source](https://twitter.com/elizabethforma/status/711951101524840448?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)', ">>{pirate_simon} : >bigotry It's not bigotry if it's true. Here is a source on the fact that illegal aliens, particular Mexican, commit far more violent crime than Americans: http://www.gao.gov/assets/320/316959.pdf I am truly sorry that the facts hurt your feelings and don't conform to your world view though :) >sexist How is that sexist? He is saying that women have flirted with him when he is in a position of power. He didn't say that all women are sex-fiends and want his cock or something >Bully I can't deny this one. He has been bullying establishment politicians from day one, and guess what? The American people are loving it! We are tired of having the establishment politicians kick our asses, and now we got a guy who is fighting back for us", '>>{ItchyThunder} : Small hands, huge conflicts of interest, thin skin - Donald J. Trump, candidate for President.', ">>{Beitje} : You want a conflict of interest? It is a FACT that Elizabeth Warren claimed to be Native American to steal a job that should have gone to someone else. If you support affirmative action, you should be horrified by this. If you're not, you're a hypocrite.", '>>{Beitje} : How is it disgusting to tell the truth about Warren?', ">>{Louisthefuckenlawyer} : Well if you ever told the truth you'd know it wasn't.", ">>{Stewpid} : > A family is a community and it recognized her as such. Warren's family: http://i.imgur.com/qIbf9Vc.jpg?1", '>>{GuitarsAndCameras} : > It\'s not bigotry if it\'s true. Republican logic. Of course, it isn\'t true, but if it were, it would still be bigotry. No one\'s "feelings" are hurt. I\'m amused, not angry. What is it with right wingers and their need to feel like they\'re hurting people? It\'s like the little boys who pull the wings off of flies.', '>>{pirate_simon} : No, it is not bigotry to say that we have a ton of dangerous Mexican illegal immigrants when we have a ton of dangerous Mexican illegal immigrants', '>>{GuitarsAndCameras} : Yes, claiming that Mexicans are rapists is bigotry.', ">>{Beitje} : Facts don't care about your feelings. If I say that 74% of black children are born in families without fathers, how is that bigoted? It's a frickin' fact.", ">>{GuitarsAndCameras} : Again, no one is talking about my feelings. They aren't the issue.", '>>{pirate_simon} : And you ignoring the source I provided that gives you scientific evidence that Mexican illegal immigrants commit much more violent crime is what? Idiocy i guess?', '>>{Beitje} : The issue is that you\'re calling facts "bigoted". That\'s just idiotic. It\'s like saying that if a crane falls from a building and lands on an Asian guy that gravity is racist.', '>>{filthymacgyver21} : I think you need to look up the definition of bigot', ">>{cool_hand_luke} : Yes, of course it's going to get ignored.", ">>{cool_hand_luke} : She's still got time. Bernie supporters are really good at hold out hope."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{wholecinnamon} : Elizabeth Warren Slams Donald Trump\'s "Huge Conflicts of Interest"', '>>{ChomskysChekist} : Warren lost a lot of respect. The audacity to attack Trump when Clinton is right there.', '>>{Hydrium} : This nobody do nothing senator that has been proven to lie is STILL talking shit?', '>>{DroogDim} : Elizabeth Warren became irrelevant when she failed to endorse Bernard Sanders.', ">>{Venturin} : This is the woman who was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for teaching how many college classes? 1? 2? And she harps on inequality, the 1%'ers and ridiculous college tuition fees? Yea she's a great one to attack other people.", '>>{amaTrex} : Elizabeth Warren is just getting annoying at this point, shes the democrats barking dog', '>>{Stewpid} : Top Ten nicknames for Elizabeth Warren who lied about being a Cherokee Indian for the purpose of stealing an affirmative action teaching position. 10) Dances With Ethics 9) Pinnocchahontas 8) Sitting Bullshit 7) Forked Tongue 6) Poserhantus 5) Hunts at Whole Foods 4) Sackatheeconomy 3) Hiataxa 2) Lie-a-watha 1) Fauxcahontas', ">>{wholecinnamon} : Lie. Charles Fried, Reagan's solicitor general and who was on Harvard's hiring committee at the time, said it was nonsense.", '>>{Louisthefuckenlawyer} : You do see how utterly grotesque you appear running this type of attack yes?', ">>{GarrioValere} : It's funny, every Liberal everywhere was quite adamant that Trump is absolutely despised by the entire Hispanic community. But a conflict of interest because the judge is Hispanic and was active in the Latino community? Ridiculous, racist, etc etc... edit: downvote all you want but we all know the same liberals attacking Trump for saying there might be a conflict of interest would absolutely be saying there was a conflict of interest if the judge were a friend of Trump.", ">>{wholecinnamon} : You might despise someone, but that doesn't mean that you can't act in a professional capacity. Judges might despise serial killers. That doesn't mean there's a conflict of interest when they preside over their trials.", '>>{Anti-Dentite8910} : Warren still needs to do something of worth in her political career before she attacks anyone.', '>>{blatherskiter} : > but that doesn\'t mean that you can\'t act in a professional capacity You mean, like "accidentally" unsealing documents?', ">>{wholecinnamon} : If he was letting his personal hatred of Trump control, he wouldn't have admitted his mistake and tried to reseal them. He allowed himself to look bad for the sake of being a professional.", ">>{GarrioValere} : > Judges might despise serial killers. That doesn't mean there's a conflict of interest. If the judge prejudged the defendant as a serial killer before hearing any evidence, and so despised him from the outset, that would absolutely be a problem. In any case, it's a cause for concern and when you're trying to win a case you look for the best possible scenario, not a judge that already hates you and wants you to burn before hearing any evidence.", '>>{Stewpid} : Her admission questionnaire required her to have proof, beyond subjective belief, that she was a Native American. She could offer no such proof so she intentionally lied in order to secure a teaching position.', '>>{Chief_Mother_Fucker} : I think someone told warren that kids these days like the when people "beef" on twitter so she thinks its "cool". arf arf arf', '>>{MrTrumpsWildRide} : Yeah, far worse than the person who actually *did* those things, is having the gall to call them out for it. What a racist amirite guys?', '>>{Backflip_Wilson} : more like "just baking the wedding cake".', ">>{wholecinnamon} : She did. It's called the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and it's gotten consumers $11 billion back from the banks and credit card companies so far.", '>>{blatherskiter} : How grotesque? Because there was a chief who called Ward Churchill, the 1990s version of Lizzie Warren pretending to be an Indian, "Chief Walking Eagle, because this bird is so full of shit he can\'t fly."', ">>{Louisthefuckenlawyer} : Except that she didn't do those things? Yeah.", '>>{MrTrumpsWildRide} : No, get your facts straight. She was rich from her career as a corporate lawyer, and then she started lying about being an indian on her job application to teach 1 class a week for over 300 thousand per year. I wonder exactly how much of that fraudulent income she contributed towards "her" Cherokee Nation tribe or indian charities.', '>>{blatherskiter} : If he didn\'t "admit" his "mistake" he could have been disbarred. It\'s a gross ethics violation. He didn\'t admit a mistake, he was covering his ass.', '>>{MrTrumpsWildRide} : Yes she did, and she lied about it. http://archive.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2012/05/31/elizabeth_warren_acknowledges_telling_harvard_penn_of_native_american_status/ What a disgusting hypocritical racist. No wonder all these regressive leftists love her so much.', '>>{wholecinnamon} : She didn\'t lie to secure a teaching position because as long-time Republican Charles Fried said, "I can state categorically that the subject of her Native American ancestry never once was mentioned."', '>>{PhilippeCoutinho} : you know the comment is serious when it\'s "Bernard" instead of "Bernie"', '>>{MrTrumpsWildRide} : Yes it does. She claimed to be native, and she is not. Hypocrite, racist, liar, REEEEEEEEEE', '>>{ChomskysChekist} : For the sake of being consistent instead of sounding like a politician.', '>>{GuitarsAndCameras} : Warren: "The job of the President is to enforce the law fairly. If a serial lawbreaker like Deutsche Bank is caught manipulating markets again, how would Trump hold it accountable knowing that the bank had the power to pull the plug on his own businesses? That\'s a question that should worry every American. " Trump: "Pocahontas" "she\'s got a big mouth." One side deals in reality, the other in puerile name calling.', ">>{wholecinnamon} : the re-sealed documents are going to be re-released, only with the personal information redacted. it's not like all the sleazy sales scripts trump U used are not going to be released anyway", '>>{Stewpid} : Her application packet contained questions that required her to answer the following question: http://legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Harvard-HR-2012-2.jpg Notice the Harvard and EEOC requirement to offer more than subjective belief.', '>>{Tony_Killfigure} : Washington corrupts all of them eventually. She lasted longer than most.', '>>{wholecinnamon} : so a single disgruntled employee makes the entire organization worthless?', ">>{Marou_} : Nah, she's the democrat's [War Chief](https://i.sli.mg/gmPTFH.jpg).", '>>{pirate_simon} : Elizabeth Warren, who more or less claims to have grown up in a wigwam, is dealing in reality. This sub loses touch with reality more every minute', '>>{GuitarsAndCameras} : Name calling is not the same as political reality.', '>>{pirate_simon} : You\'re right. How many names has Elizabeth called Donald? "racist" "bigot" "sexist" "bully". When will she learn to put a stop to this baseless name-calling? She\'s throwing shit at the wall and hoping it sticks', '>>{Louisthefuckenlawyer} : Look at my African American Donald Trump.', '>>{pirate_simon} : If I had no argumentative recourse, I would probably also cite a small gaffe where Trump a word', ">>{Louisthefuckenlawyer} : Sure thing buddy. That's what this whole board is these days. Well made arguments for the thought out policies of trump. Gonna be a cruel November for all of you. Best part is you'll all disappear when he loses.", ">>{MrTrumpsWildRide} : Reality Sure, everybody knows reality has a left leaning bias, where white people can be native americans if the *feeeel like it, maaaan*. She's a racist lying hypocrite who fraudulently used the plight of Cherokee people to further her career and political ambition. Fuck her.", ">>{wholecinnamon} : She said she thought she was native-american because that's what her family had told her and believed. A family is a community and it recognized her as such.", ">>{pirate_simon} : I'm a republican who has been in this sub for years. What makes you think I would go away just because the presidential election is over? Unlike most dems, I have a strong understanding of the importance of local elections as well as midterm elections, and we will hand your asses to you in those yet again as well :) Have a nice day", ">>{youareaspastic} : Are you just going to ignore the disparity between Trump and Warren's statements orrrrr...?", ">>{MrTrumpsWildRide} : They're all crooked establishment cronies who deserve to drown too. You think all this Clinton stuff just *suddenly* came as a huge surprise to all of them? They're like the mafia.", ">>{youareaspastic} : Well this statement wasn't made on Twitter but I can see you've been wanting to post that for a while so ok", '>>{GuitarsAndCameras} : Bigotry: "When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending the best. They’re not sending you, they’re sending people that have lots of problems and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bring crime. They’re rapists." Sexist: “All of the women on The Apprentice flirted with me – consciously or unconsciously. That’s to be expected.” Bully: “If I were running ‘The View’, I’d fire Rosie O’Donnell. I mean, I’d look at her right in that fat, ugly face of hers, I’d say ‘Rosie, you’re fired.’” Nothing baseless about what Warren said.', ">>{youareaspastic} : I don't see what that has to do with the article but ok", '>>{pirate_simon} : Ah yes, it\'s always refreshing to see the "trump is literally hitler" argument coming from a senator [source](https://twitter.com/elizabethforma/status/711951101524840448?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)', ">>{pirate_simon} : >bigotry It's not bigotry if it's true. Here is a source on the fact that illegal aliens, particular Mexican, commit far more violent crime than Americans: http://www.gao.gov/assets/320/316959.pdf I am truly sorry that the facts hurt your feelings and don't conform to your world view though :) >sexist How is that sexist? He is saying that women have flirted with him when he is in a position of power. He didn't say that all women are sex-fiends and want his cock or something >Bully I can't deny this one. He has been bullying establishment politicians from day one, and guess what? The American people are loving it! We are tired of having the establishment politicians kick our asses, and now we got a guy who is fighting back for us", '>>{ItchyThunder} : Small hands, huge conflicts of interest, thin skin - Donald J. Trump, candidate for President.', ">>{Beitje} : You want a conflict of interest? It is a FACT that Elizabeth Warren claimed to be Native American to steal a job that should have gone to someone else. If you support affirmative action, you should be horrified by this. If you're not, you're a hypocrite.", '>>{Beitje} : How is it disgusting to tell the truth about Warren?', ">>{Louisthefuckenlawyer} : Well if you ever told the truth you'd know it wasn't.", ">>{Stewpid} : > A family is a community and it recognized her as such. Warren's family: http://i.imgur.com/qIbf9Vc.jpg?1", '>>{GuitarsAndCameras} : > It\'s not bigotry if it\'s true. Republican logic. Of course, it isn\'t true, but if it were, it would still be bigotry. No one\'s "feelings" are hurt. I\'m amused, not angry. What is it with right wingers and their need to feel like they\'re hurting people? It\'s like the little boys who pull the wings off of flies.', '>>{pirate_simon} : No, it is not bigotry to say that we have a ton of dangerous Mexican illegal immigrants when we have a ton of dangerous Mexican illegal immigrants', '>>{GuitarsAndCameras} : Yes, claiming that Mexicans are rapists is bigotry.', ">>{Beitje} : Facts don't care about your feelings. If I say that 74% of black children are born in families without fathers, how is that bigoted? It's a frickin' fact.", ">>{GuitarsAndCameras} : Again, no one is talking about my feelings. They aren't the issue.", '>>{pirate_simon} : And you ignoring the source I provided that gives you scientific evidence that Mexican illegal immigrants commit much more violent crime is what? Idiocy i guess?', '>>{Beitje} : The issue is that you\'re calling facts "bigoted". That\'s just idiotic. It\'s like saying that if a crane falls from a building and lands on an Asian guy that gravity is racist.', '>>{filthymacgyver21} : I think you need to look up the definition of bigot', ">>{cool_hand_luke} : Yes, of course it's going to get ignored.", ">>{cool_hand_luke} : She's still got time. Bernie supporters are really good at hold out hope."], ['>>{KarlMarxIsntDead} : FDR Rejected Anne Frank Twice as a Refugee, Advocate Urges Trump Not to Close U.S. Borders Again', '>>{President_Tantrump} : “Only Thing We Have to Fear Is Fear Itself” - FDR Scared men should not be allowed to hold positions of power.', '>>{TrumpVotersAre2Blame} : It is easy to give yourself a pass in hindsight and assume if you were in some historical situation you would have done the right thing. Every day we have a choice to do the right thing. As William Faulkner once said "History is not was, it is." As we pass through our own part of history we have to decide which side of the story we want to be on. We all get to decide how those in the future with the gift of hindsight will judge us.', '>>{SarcasticallyAShill} : Anne Frank? An example of somebody who’s done an amazing job and is getting recognized more and more -Donald Trump', ">>{EmpatheticBankRobber} : All Trump knows is that this Anne woman keeps being mean to him. Doesn't she know that he got the most electoral votes ever?", ">>{your_fathers_beard} : Comparing 1940s Jewish refugees to current day Islamic refugees isn't really fair.", ">>{Yodwinder} : Somehow I don't think the anti-semite cares about what happened to Anne Frank.", '>>{your_fathers_beard} : Very different situations. Jew\'s in ww2 were being systematically exterminated by an outside force based on perceived "race". Islamic refugees, by and large, are fleeing internal conflicts between warring factions of their religion in their homeland...', '>>{SantaHickeys} : And what can people who are not soldiers in syria do but flee?', '>>{your_fathers_beard} : If they are fleeing from an actual combat zone, thats one thing. But if they are just leaving the country because \'Hey Im Syrian, I can go to Europe!\' Especially these "Young" men, who don\'t have to prove their age, and are often adult men who are just not married. There is also a major assimilation problem with Islamic refugees, whereas the Jewish refugees of the 30s and 40s were a little better at adapting.']]

classify and reply

['>>{amlashi} : GOP senator on the Iran deal: I told you so', ">>{x86_64Ubuntu} : Who cares? Iran is a sovereign country who we have no right to be dictating shit to. The biggest issue we have in the US is that if Iran does get nukes, we won't be able to have an Iraq in 2003 war of option and adventure.", ">>{theombudsmen} : That's their favorite phrase. I truly believe that one of the greatest joys in a Republicans life is when something bad happens that they can try to pin on the 'other team' that reinforces their ideological choices. That being said, the fact that they are saying 10 years now >The Republican chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said the release of secret documents that revealed Iran might be able to produce a nuclear weapon in a little more than a decade should show the public why the U.S. should never have agreed to the deal. 10 years is a hell of a lot better than the [1 year the same people claimed we had](http://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear-panetta-idUSBRE88A0R920120911) in 2012. Hit piece, spin, and misrepresented for partisan gain by Bob Corker, just in time for the election season where their primary opponent was Secretary of State during early negotiations of the deal.", '>>{Skipper2399} : Trump Catches Up To Clinton, Latest Reuters/Ipsos Poll Finds', '>>{hwkns} : Very possible that long before that time frame is reached the US and Iran will be closely allied.', '>>{Skipper2399} : Have you looked at the internals of those polls to see the D+6 sample sizes? According to Gallup, the country is currently 29% R, 29% D, and 42% Independent. So why is it that every poll has more democrats than Republicans?', '>>{farcetragedy} : so they *"might"* be able to build a nuclear weapon in a little over 10 years from now. Refusing the deal and allowing them to continue on their path to build a nuclear weapon in a little over 1 year from now . . . would be preferable??? Do these Republicans ever think?', '>>{Cyberhwk} : [#5](http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/13-tips-for-reading-general-election-polls-like-a-pro/). > Anyone passionately arguing that a poll is wrong because its sample has “too many [xx]” or “too many of this group are voting for [xx]” is probably wrong.', ">>{moxy801} : > Do these Republicans ever think? Their aim is not to illuminate, it is to manipulate. Their showboating both has a logic to it and is something they don't expect their base to understand.", '>>{r00tdenied} : Iran has been on the path to becoming a more progressive state for a while. Hard liners are dying off and being pushed from government. Slowly, but surely. Its a bad idea to start slinging shit at a country that actually has a very pro-US population. Its the upper echelons of the Iranian govt that is the problem.', '>>{ralala} : > Iran has been on the path to becoming a more progressive state for a while. And even the way you phrase that assertion should give you pause. Every 5 years or so since 1979 we\'ve heard that Iran is "on the path to becoming more progressive." What does this mean in practice? That they\'re electing moderates to figurehead positions? They\'ve been doing that for [a while](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Khatami) already. > Slowly, but surely. Its a bad idea to start slinging shit at a country that actually has a very pro-US population. This gets to the meat of your bullshit. Yes--Iran\'s younger generation is more progressive, insofar as they are less religious and don\'t want Iran to be a *global* pariah. But this has little to do with being pro-US. Especially when it comes to specific foreign policy decisions. You think the younger, more progressive, generation of Iranians is against the country attaining Nuclear power? Look at the actual polls. None of this is meant to justify Republican brinkmanship bullshit and the rest. You just can\'t assert that \'it\'s very possible\' the US and Iran will be closely allied within a decade by finding vague, not necessarily pro-US demographic shifts in Iran on the horizon.', '>>{shillmaster_9000} : So does your poll not have those same stats? Proof on those polls having more Democrats?', ">>{r00tdenied} : I know several Iranian immigrants here in the US. You're quite wrong and your line of thinking is a perfect example of why we have a problem with Iran. Our interventionism foreign policy is the source of all our problems with Iran.", '>>{lipsyncforyourlife} : Because democrats make up the largest bloc of voters on general election day. Independents actually come out less than Republicans and Democrats, even though most people in the country are independent.', '>>{ralala} : The thoughts of Iranian immigrants != the thoughts of Iranians living in Iran. I also know Iranian immigrants living here; there\'s a reason they\'re immigrants. > You\'re quite wrong You know you usually need actual arguments in order to substantiate claims? "You\'re wrong i know immigrants!" is not an argument about the state of Iran. > your line of thinking is a perfect example of why we have a problem with Iran. Our interventionism foreign policy is the source of all our problems with Iran. How in the world did you impute support for an interventionist foreign policy from my comment? Did you just conveniently skip the part where I say "None of this is meant to justify Republican brinkmanship bullshit"? Maybe your reading skills are the reason we have a problem.', '>>{r00tdenied} : >I also know Iranian immigrants living here; there\'s a reason they\'re immigrants. Sure. Like I said its the government that is filled with hardliners. They are here fleeing the government. One that they largely did not really choose to represent them. Taking actions that harms both the government AND the pro-US population is a sure way to turn the pro-US population into an anti-US population. >How in the world did you impute support for an interventionist foreign policy from my comment? Because that has been the status quo regarding Iran since the 1950s and you\'re towing the line. >Did you just conveniently skip the part where I say "None of this is meant to justify Republican brinkmanship bullshit"? Nah, I didn\'t skip it. I just ignored it because it demonstrates that you clearly are unaware of the history of our interventionist policies with Iran. I dislike Republican foreign policy too, but this is an issue that has spanned both Dem and GOP administrations and until recently, they have typically taken the same stance. >Maybe your reading skills are the reason we have a problem. So. . .you\'re wrong and have been proven that you\'re wrong and you attack me. Nice. My turn then: > You know you usually need actual arguments in order to substantiate claims? I\'ve already made them previously. Its obvious to me you have a short attention span, or you\'re possibly illiterate. Maybe both. EDIT: >The thoughts of Iranian immigrants != the thoughts of Iranians living in Iran. Actually they do line up. The few Iranian Americans I know, actually do travel home to see family and friends.', '>>{ralala} : > Sure. Like I said its the government that is filled with hardliners. Actually, that isn\'t exactly true. The president is a moderate, the elections in Teheran produced victories for moderates; every time there\'s an election, more moderates win. Except guess what, elected moderates != a moderate supreme leader != pro US Iranian foreign policy; and even if you do think there is some vague move toward the US in Iran, this *certainly* doesn\'t imply that the US and Iran will be "closely allied" anytime soon--which, if your reading skills aren\'t failing, you should recall is the original comment you started out defending. I mean, if the US and Iran were on the brink of friendship, surely ISIS, a mutual enemy of the US and Iran would\'ve been a godsend to that end. What gives? > Because that has been the status quo regarding Iran since the 1950s and you\'re towing the line. What a dumb thing to say. How does arguing that the US and Iran are not about to become close allies suggest that anyone should intervene in Iran? Are you just playing dumb? Surely anyone with half a brain should see that "Iran is our best friend!" and "we don\'t *love* Iran therefore it\'s time for war!" are not the only two options that exist in international relations. > Nah, I didn\'t skip it. I just ignored it because it demonstrates that you clearly are unaware of the history of our interventionist policies with Iran. I dislike Republican foreign policy too, but this is an issue that has spanned both Dem and GOP administrations and until recently, they have typically taken the same stance. Ignoring is skipping. The status quo has varied pretty significantly, and has depended in part on Iranian leadership. Let\'s not pretend that Iran circa 2000 = Iran circa 2007. Oh wait, I forgot you don\'t have an actual argument, so none of this matters to you, does it? > So. . .you\'re wrong and have been proven that you\'re wrong and you attack me I didn\'t realize contradicting what the other person is saying without making an argument or providing any evidence = "proving someone wrong." Ok. > Actually they do line up. The few Iranian Americans I know, actually do travel home to see family and friends. Do we need to do this again? The fact that you know a handful of Iranian Americans that travel to Iran doesn\'t mean you have your finger on the pulse of the Iranian psyche. That\'s called being a presumptuous. Doing that while presuming that anyone that disagrees with you is an imperialist is being a presumptuous ass.', ">>{TRUMP_EQUALS_HITLER} : Because that's historically how the demographics have looked for people who vote at the polls. -|D|R|I|Net -|-|-|-|- 2008|39|32|29|D+7 2012|38|32|29|D+6 ([source](http://www.people-press.org/2012/11/07/changing-face-of-america-helps-assure-obama-victory/))", ">>{deathuntoourenemies} : That's the only source I've ever seen with the same number of democrats and republicans. The last to cycles there where about six percent more democrats and I've seen recent sources say the same thing.", '>>{cyanocobalamin} : /u/greenlife4 I am not the person who posted the article. That would be /u/Skipper2399', ">>{Anal_Vacuum} : He was down by 6 a week or two ago. He's catching up.", ">>{shillmaster_9000} : Now hes down by four, (probably more with the exclusion of a tracking poll). And this isn't a gain from his own virtue, clinton just went down. He's been down by six or more for about a month now, two points isn't exactly the rally you're making it out to be.", ">>{Anal_Vacuum} : I think he did have something to do with it himself. He went to Mexico and gave a formal presidential press conference with the leader of a foreign nation, and then he got a standing ovation at a black Church in Detroit. I think he's starting to learn this whole campaigning thing properly.", '>>{n0ahbody} : The mods don\'t care. They\'ll flair it "Unacceptable Title" or "Editorialized Title" or "Off Topic" if they feel like it.', ">>{farcetragedy} : Yeah he's definitely winning over black and Hispanic voters.", ">>{AllHailKingJeb} : Please, Hillaristas, don't come crying to progressives when he wins. We told you we wouldn't vote for Hillary and we won't. Maybe next time! 😎", ">>{zeph3939} : >Trump Catches Up To Clinton, **Latest Reuters/Ipsos Poll Finds** They're talking specifically about the Reuters poll, which does indeed show just a 1 point difference. Did you even read the article? Even the RCP link you just posted verifies the claim.", ">>{shillmaster_9000} : > I think he did have something to do with it himself. It literally didn't, considering his poll numbers didn't rise, hillarys dropped. >He went to Mexico and gave a formal presidential press conference with the leader of a foreign nation, Then lied about their meeting (or, at the very least, got into a fight with a foreign leader) >and then he got a standing ovation at a black Church in Detroit. And he still is doing worse with blacks than the last six republican candidates. And who gives a fuck? A black church is just a campaign stop, even if trump didn't fuck it up, this doesn't magically make him 'presidential'", '>>{POCKALEELEE} : Polling at 0% among black. ZERO. Let that sink in.', ">>{AllHailKingJeb} : Please, Hitlaristas, don't come crying to progressives when he wins. We told you we wouldn't vote for Hillary and we won't. Maybe next time! 😎", '>>{AbstractTeserract} : >As of last Friday, the separate Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation polling project estimated Clinton was on track to win the Electoral College, by about 332 votes to 206. Yeah', ">>{POCKALEELEE} : It shouldn't be. But it is, too often.", ">>{TrumpsMonkeyPaw} : The Trump bar is so goddamn low that people forget one good day doesn't actually make up for a lifetime of bullshit. Clinton is really judged by angelic standards, and if Trump only gets three timeouts in a day he's golden. Fucking horse race obsessed media", ">>{TrumpsMonkeyPaw} : Dude, Bernie couldn't even win a primary despite being so 'popular'. He had no chance in the general Edit: he only did as well as he did because of low turnout caucuses", ">>{AllHailKingJeb} : Nope. He always had a 2-digit lead on Trump in head to heads. At times as high as 17%. Hillary could never break 10 pts and usually was under 5. She sucks. Hillary's sad sacks chose the loser.", ">>{TrumpsMonkeyPaw} : Kasich was stomping Hillary in theoretical match ups. The other sides didn't see either as threats so they never attacked them with gusto.Neither won and were never an actual threat", ">>{AllHailKingJeb} : Actually Trump was scared shitless of Bernie that's why The Don didn't do the debate in California. And Hillary backed down from that one too. Both cowards. They just didn't need to attack Bernie because they knew the backstabbing anti-progressive corporate DNC trash would do it for them. Hell even Trump knows that.", '>>{Anal_Vacuum} : That picture keeps floating around, but it was taken before the event even started. If you watched the live stream, the church was full.', ">>{WickyRL} : Lol, it's pretty low for Clinton too. Both candidates are a damn joke.", '>>{BHSbratsche} : Selection bias would like to have a word with you...', '>>{cyanocobalamin} : The polls have gone back and forth in this election. I wouldn\'t write "The End" for either candidate yet. I think all bets are off until after the first debate, which can easily go either way for giving either candidate a big boost in the polls.', '>>{Roseking} : Are you just glossing over the fact the Mexican President called him on his lies and Trump started a Twitter fight with him?', '>>{Anal_Vacuum} : What lies did the president call him out on?', '>>{Roseking} : Trump said they did not discuss paying for the wall. The President said the first thing he told Trump at their meeting Mexico was not paying for the wall.', ">>{Anal_Vacuum} : The president also went on to say during an interview that Trump didn't lie because there was no discussion. He just made the statement and Trump didn't respond.", ">>{Maybewhocansay} : Delete what? That Trump has a lawsuit claiming he is Jared from Subway pedophile? It is going to be on USA Today in 2 weeks or before. If it isn't true he should address it. I want to hear his official response and I will enjoy Pence homophobe governor running mate having to defend him.", ">>{Da_UniqueUser} : Lol. You're lying through your teeth. I'd like to see one national poll showing trump at 0%. He has 20% of African Americans according to a recent Florida poll.", '>>{Anal_Vacuum} : Re-read it when you graduate middle school, then.', '>>{duqit} : Can you imagine the right wing hate machine if Obama met a world leader while he was running on 08. You guys would have fucking died.', '>>{Anal_Vacuum} : Probably. Obama had next to 0 experience in speaking with high priority people.', ">>{duqit} : Trump has literally no public service experience. And you want him to be POTUS. This is based on the assumption he's a successful businessman , which you can't confirm because he won't release his taxes.", ">>{Anal_Vacuum} : Hillary's only public service record consists of expanding ISIS and destabilizing an African country. I think ill take my chances on a man who has a building worth 500 million dollars, and only a handful of bankruptcies.", '>>{growyurown} : Not even slightly surprising. Hillary is a horrible candidate with more baggage than gucci.', ">>{duqit} : - only - You're getting hustled by a New York real estate developer. Welcome to a big club."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{Skipper2399} : Trump Catches Up To Clinton, Latest Reuters/Ipsos Poll Finds', '>>{Skipper2399} : Have you looked at the internals of those polls to see the D+6 sample sizes? According to Gallup, the country is currently 29% R, 29% D, and 42% Independent. So why is it that every poll has more democrats than Republicans?', '>>{Cyberhwk} : [#5](http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/13-tips-for-reading-general-election-polls-like-a-pro/). > Anyone passionately arguing that a poll is wrong because its sample has “too many [xx]” or “too many of this group are voting for [xx]” is probably wrong.', '>>{shillmaster_9000} : So does your poll not have those same stats? Proof on those polls having more Democrats?', '>>{lipsyncforyourlife} : Because democrats make up the largest bloc of voters on general election day. Independents actually come out less than Republicans and Democrats, even though most people in the country are independent.', ">>{TRUMP_EQUALS_HITLER} : Because that's historically how the demographics have looked for people who vote at the polls. -|D|R|I|Net -|-|-|-|- 2008|39|32|29|D+7 2012|38|32|29|D+6 ([source](http://www.people-press.org/2012/11/07/changing-face-of-america-helps-assure-obama-victory/))", ">>{deathuntoourenemies} : That's the only source I've ever seen with the same number of democrats and republicans. The last to cycles there where about six percent more democrats and I've seen recent sources say the same thing.", '>>{cyanocobalamin} : /u/greenlife4 I am not the person who posted the article. That would be /u/Skipper2399', ">>{Anal_Vacuum} : He was down by 6 a week or two ago. He's catching up.", ">>{shillmaster_9000} : Now hes down by four, (probably more with the exclusion of a tracking poll). And this isn't a gain from his own virtue, clinton just went down. He's been down by six or more for about a month now, two points isn't exactly the rally you're making it out to be.", ">>{Anal_Vacuum} : I think he did have something to do with it himself. He went to Mexico and gave a formal presidential press conference with the leader of a foreign nation, and then he got a standing ovation at a black Church in Detroit. I think he's starting to learn this whole campaigning thing properly.", '>>{n0ahbody} : The mods don\'t care. They\'ll flair it "Unacceptable Title" or "Editorialized Title" or "Off Topic" if they feel like it.', ">>{farcetragedy} : Yeah he's definitely winning over black and Hispanic voters.", ">>{AllHailKingJeb} : Please, Hillaristas, don't come crying to progressives when he wins. We told you we wouldn't vote for Hillary and we won't. Maybe next time! 😎", ">>{zeph3939} : >Trump Catches Up To Clinton, **Latest Reuters/Ipsos Poll Finds** They're talking specifically about the Reuters poll, which does indeed show just a 1 point difference. Did you even read the article? Even the RCP link you just posted verifies the claim.", ">>{shillmaster_9000} : > I think he did have something to do with it himself. It literally didn't, considering his poll numbers didn't rise, hillarys dropped. >He went to Mexico and gave a formal presidential press conference with the leader of a foreign nation, Then lied about their meeting (or, at the very least, got into a fight with a foreign leader) >and then he got a standing ovation at a black Church in Detroit. And he still is doing worse with blacks than the last six republican candidates. And who gives a fuck? A black church is just a campaign stop, even if trump didn't fuck it up, this doesn't magically make him 'presidential'", '>>{POCKALEELEE} : Polling at 0% among black. ZERO. Let that sink in.', ">>{AllHailKingJeb} : Please, Hitlaristas, don't come crying to progressives when he wins. We told you we wouldn't vote for Hillary and we won't. Maybe next time! 😎", '>>{AbstractTeserract} : >As of last Friday, the separate Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation polling project estimated Clinton was on track to win the Electoral College, by about 332 votes to 206. Yeah', ">>{POCKALEELEE} : It shouldn't be. But it is, too often.", ">>{TrumpsMonkeyPaw} : The Trump bar is so goddamn low that people forget one good day doesn't actually make up for a lifetime of bullshit. Clinton is really judged by angelic standards, and if Trump only gets three timeouts in a day he's golden. Fucking horse race obsessed media", ">>{TrumpsMonkeyPaw} : Dude, Bernie couldn't even win a primary despite being so 'popular'. He had no chance in the general Edit: he only did as well as he did because of low turnout caucuses", ">>{AllHailKingJeb} : Nope. He always had a 2-digit lead on Trump in head to heads. At times as high as 17%. Hillary could never break 10 pts and usually was under 5. She sucks. Hillary's sad sacks chose the loser.", ">>{TrumpsMonkeyPaw} : Kasich was stomping Hillary in theoretical match ups. The other sides didn't see either as threats so they never attacked them with gusto.Neither won and were never an actual threat", ">>{AllHailKingJeb} : Actually Trump was scared shitless of Bernie that's why The Don didn't do the debate in California. And Hillary backed down from that one too. Both cowards. They just didn't need to attack Bernie because they knew the backstabbing anti-progressive corporate DNC trash would do it for them. Hell even Trump knows that.", '>>{Anal_Vacuum} : That picture keeps floating around, but it was taken before the event even started. If you watched the live stream, the church was full.', ">>{WickyRL} : Lol, it's pretty low for Clinton too. Both candidates are a damn joke.", '>>{BHSbratsche} : Selection bias would like to have a word with you...', '>>{cyanocobalamin} : The polls have gone back and forth in this election. I wouldn\'t write "The End" for either candidate yet. I think all bets are off until after the first debate, which can easily go either way for giving either candidate a big boost in the polls.', '>>{Roseking} : Are you just glossing over the fact the Mexican President called him on his lies and Trump started a Twitter fight with him?', '>>{Anal_Vacuum} : What lies did the president call him out on?', '>>{Roseking} : Trump said they did not discuss paying for the wall. The President said the first thing he told Trump at their meeting Mexico was not paying for the wall.', ">>{Anal_Vacuum} : The president also went on to say during an interview that Trump didn't lie because there was no discussion. He just made the statement and Trump didn't respond.", ">>{Maybewhocansay} : Delete what? That Trump has a lawsuit claiming he is Jared from Subway pedophile? It is going to be on USA Today in 2 weeks or before. If it isn't true he should address it. I want to hear his official response and I will enjoy Pence homophobe governor running mate having to defend him.", ">>{Da_UniqueUser} : Lol. You're lying through your teeth. I'd like to see one national poll showing trump at 0%. He has 20% of African Americans according to a recent Florida poll.", '>>{Anal_Vacuum} : Re-read it when you graduate middle school, then.', '>>{duqit} : Can you imagine the right wing hate machine if Obama met a world leader while he was running on 08. You guys would have fucking died.', '>>{Anal_Vacuum} : Probably. Obama had next to 0 experience in speaking with high priority people.', ">>{duqit} : Trump has literally no public service experience. And you want him to be POTUS. This is based on the assumption he's a successful businessman , which you can't confirm because he won't release his taxes.", ">>{Anal_Vacuum} : Hillary's only public service record consists of expanding ISIS and destabilizing an African country. I think ill take my chances on a man who has a building worth 500 million dollars, and only a handful of bankruptcies.", '>>{growyurown} : Not even slightly surprising. Hillary is a horrible candidate with more baggage than gucci.', ">>{duqit} : - only - You're getting hustled by a New York real estate developer. Welcome to a big club."], ['>>{amlashi} : GOP senator on the Iran deal: I told you so', ">>{x86_64Ubuntu} : Who cares? Iran is a sovereign country who we have no right to be dictating shit to. The biggest issue we have in the US is that if Iran does get nukes, we won't be able to have an Iraq in 2003 war of option and adventure.", ">>{theombudsmen} : That's their favorite phrase. I truly believe that one of the greatest joys in a Republicans life is when something bad happens that they can try to pin on the 'other team' that reinforces their ideological choices. That being said, the fact that they are saying 10 years now >The Republican chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said the release of secret documents that revealed Iran might be able to produce a nuclear weapon in a little more than a decade should show the public why the U.S. should never have agreed to the deal. 10 years is a hell of a lot better than the [1 year the same people claimed we had](http://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear-panetta-idUSBRE88A0R920120911) in 2012. Hit piece, spin, and misrepresented for partisan gain by Bob Corker, just in time for the election season where their primary opponent was Secretary of State during early negotiations of the deal.", '>>{hwkns} : Very possible that long before that time frame is reached the US and Iran will be closely allied.', '>>{farcetragedy} : so they *"might"* be able to build a nuclear weapon in a little over 10 years from now. Refusing the deal and allowing them to continue on their path to build a nuclear weapon in a little over 1 year from now . . . would be preferable??? Do these Republicans ever think?', ">>{moxy801} : > Do these Republicans ever think? Their aim is not to illuminate, it is to manipulate. Their showboating both has a logic to it and is something they don't expect their base to understand.", '>>{r00tdenied} : Iran has been on the path to becoming a more progressive state for a while. Hard liners are dying off and being pushed from government. Slowly, but surely. Its a bad idea to start slinging shit at a country that actually has a very pro-US population. Its the upper echelons of the Iranian govt that is the problem.', '>>{ralala} : > Iran has been on the path to becoming a more progressive state for a while. And even the way you phrase that assertion should give you pause. Every 5 years or so since 1979 we\'ve heard that Iran is "on the path to becoming more progressive." What does this mean in practice? That they\'re electing moderates to figurehead positions? They\'ve been doing that for [a while](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Khatami) already. > Slowly, but surely. Its a bad idea to start slinging shit at a country that actually has a very pro-US population. This gets to the meat of your bullshit. Yes--Iran\'s younger generation is more progressive, insofar as they are less religious and don\'t want Iran to be a *global* pariah. But this has little to do with being pro-US. Especially when it comes to specific foreign policy decisions. You think the younger, more progressive, generation of Iranians is against the country attaining Nuclear power? Look at the actual polls. None of this is meant to justify Republican brinkmanship bullshit and the rest. You just can\'t assert that \'it\'s very possible\' the US and Iran will be closely allied within a decade by finding vague, not necessarily pro-US demographic shifts in Iran on the horizon.', ">>{r00tdenied} : I know several Iranian immigrants here in the US. You're quite wrong and your line of thinking is a perfect example of why we have a problem with Iran. Our interventionism foreign policy is the source of all our problems with Iran.", '>>{ralala} : The thoughts of Iranian immigrants != the thoughts of Iranians living in Iran. I also know Iranian immigrants living here; there\'s a reason they\'re immigrants. > You\'re quite wrong You know you usually need actual arguments in order to substantiate claims? "You\'re wrong i know immigrants!" is not an argument about the state of Iran. > your line of thinking is a perfect example of why we have a problem with Iran. Our interventionism foreign policy is the source of all our problems with Iran. How in the world did you impute support for an interventionist foreign policy from my comment? Did you just conveniently skip the part where I say "None of this is meant to justify Republican brinkmanship bullshit"? Maybe your reading skills are the reason we have a problem.', '>>{r00tdenied} : >I also know Iranian immigrants living here; there\'s a reason they\'re immigrants. Sure. Like I said its the government that is filled with hardliners. They are here fleeing the government. One that they largely did not really choose to represent them. Taking actions that harms both the government AND the pro-US population is a sure way to turn the pro-US population into an anti-US population. >How in the world did you impute support for an interventionist foreign policy from my comment? Because that has been the status quo regarding Iran since the 1950s and you\'re towing the line. >Did you just conveniently skip the part where I say "None of this is meant to justify Republican brinkmanship bullshit"? Nah, I didn\'t skip it. I just ignored it because it demonstrates that you clearly are unaware of the history of our interventionist policies with Iran. I dislike Republican foreign policy too, but this is an issue that has spanned both Dem and GOP administrations and until recently, they have typically taken the same stance. >Maybe your reading skills are the reason we have a problem. So. . .you\'re wrong and have been proven that you\'re wrong and you attack me. Nice. My turn then: > You know you usually need actual arguments in order to substantiate claims? I\'ve already made them previously. Its obvious to me you have a short attention span, or you\'re possibly illiterate. Maybe both. EDIT: >The thoughts of Iranian immigrants != the thoughts of Iranians living in Iran. Actually they do line up. The few Iranian Americans I know, actually do travel home to see family and friends.', '>>{ralala} : > Sure. Like I said its the government that is filled with hardliners. Actually, that isn\'t exactly true. The president is a moderate, the elections in Teheran produced victories for moderates; every time there\'s an election, more moderates win. Except guess what, elected moderates != a moderate supreme leader != pro US Iranian foreign policy; and even if you do think there is some vague move toward the US in Iran, this *certainly* doesn\'t imply that the US and Iran will be "closely allied" anytime soon--which, if your reading skills aren\'t failing, you should recall is the original comment you started out defending. I mean, if the US and Iran were on the brink of friendship, surely ISIS, a mutual enemy of the US and Iran would\'ve been a godsend to that end. What gives? > Because that has been the status quo regarding Iran since the 1950s and you\'re towing the line. What a dumb thing to say. How does arguing that the US and Iran are not about to become close allies suggest that anyone should intervene in Iran? Are you just playing dumb? Surely anyone with half a brain should see that "Iran is our best friend!" and "we don\'t *love* Iran therefore it\'s time for war!" are not the only two options that exist in international relations. > Nah, I didn\'t skip it. I just ignored it because it demonstrates that you clearly are unaware of the history of our interventionist policies with Iran. I dislike Republican foreign policy too, but this is an issue that has spanned both Dem and GOP administrations and until recently, they have typically taken the same stance. Ignoring is skipping. The status quo has varied pretty significantly, and has depended in part on Iranian leadership. Let\'s not pretend that Iran circa 2000 = Iran circa 2007. Oh wait, I forgot you don\'t have an actual argument, so none of this matters to you, does it? > So. . .you\'re wrong and have been proven that you\'re wrong and you attack me I didn\'t realize contradicting what the other person is saying without making an argument or providing any evidence = "proving someone wrong." Ok. > Actually they do line up. The few Iranian Americans I know, actually do travel home to see family and friends. Do we need to do this again? The fact that you know a handful of Iranian Americans that travel to Iran doesn\'t mean you have your finger on the pulse of the Iranian psyche. That\'s called being a presumptuous. Doing that while presuming that anyone that disagrees with you is an imperialist is being a presumptuous ass.']]

classify and reply

[">>{miryslough} : Hannity accuses NBC News of 'political jihad' after Trump tax leak", ">>{johnmountain} : Tech firms' encryption foe struggles for U.S. Senate re-election - Senator Richard Burr from North Carolina, the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, is facing a strong and unexpected challenge from Democrat Deborah Ross.", '>>{playvoid} : Obama issued more than $890 billion in regulations as president, study finds', '>>{AlphaCygni} : We need all the help we can get here in NC. Burr has a lot of money and recognition. That Ross has gotten this close is amazing.', ">>{pizzashill} : Honestly we don't need regulations. Corporations will self-regulate like they do in India and China. Sure, kids might be getting their heads chopped off by kite strings with Chinese glass, but hey, who cares.", '>>{backpackwayne} : So do a lot of us old farts. I love the way she goes after Trump.', ">>{JLord} : I don't understand how regulations are being measured in terms of dollar amounts. Is this an estimated economic impact, an amount of direct government spending, a reduction in government revenue, some combination of these?", ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : Lol. But they won't vote for them, they're going to be too busy wringing their hands and playing Pokémon Go.", ">>{chefr89} : I wouldn't say 'amazing' given the fact Trump has turned the top of the GOP ticket into a shit show, not to mention the 2014 Senate race involved Democrat Kay Hagan losing her re-election bid miraculously. NC has had an interesting history of electing Democrats and Republicans to top-level offices fairly regularly. Up until McCrory got elected, we had a Dem in the guv's mansion for 16 years I think.", ">>{The_Distance_From} : I wonder if it's his thumblike shape that makes him go so far up trumps ass so easily.", ">>{miltedmalkball} : Wasn't he supposed to get waterboarded for charity or something? When is that happening?", '>>{orp0piru} : What goes around comes around. Call it asshole-grabbing.', '>>{BadChicken47} : >The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued $344 billion worth of regulations What is that even supposed to mean?', ">>{Davidfreeze} : When it comes to being against encryption it's been bipartisan. But not universal. Plenty of people on both sides stand for encryption.", ">>{DarkMaturus} : Let's turn this country Blue! Here is the Democratic challenger Deborah Ross' Twitter handle. Let's help her out! @DeborahRossNC. She could end up being an amazing ally for Bernie and Hillary in the Senate.", ">>{stop-being-poor} : please don't give in to these SJWs, Hillary. They're just going to vote for puppy-pushed Jill Stein anyways. May as well get Tim Kaine through the door.", '>>{Cenbe2} : No context. No examples. Just raw numbers grabbed from nowhere. But stupid people and clever politicians will latch onto this and start regurgitating it ad nauseum.', '>>{Rupperrt} : China and India has implemented thousands of regulations by now. Will be fun to see if US ends up below their level.', ">>{LeftousCrusader} : There are three interest groups advocating to destroy encryption. The first is well-known: spies. The second is also well-known, but trying to be very quiet: cops. The third is not mentioned often: the copyright industry. Everyone else, from private citizens to big banks, needs stronger information security. The spies are making hay with our current technology. They can see **everything**, but it does them no good because of the Base Rate Fallacy: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/07/terrorists_data.html The cops are also making hay. They cannot use mass surveillance to prevent crime for the same reason that spies can't use it to prevent terrorism, but they can use it to discover evidence once a crime has been committed. Hopefully someone in that camp will come to understand that bad encryption creates crime because it presents an opportunity to criminals. The copyright industry is doomed. Their business model demands that making a copy of intellectual property implies giving them money, but the entire purpose of information technology is to make copying information free and easy. TPP furthers their desperate effort to make the public bear the cost of propping up their irrational business model by paying for police, prosecutors, judges and prisons. We'll win the encryption war in the end, but the end will come much sooner if we get rid of the legislators who dance to the tune of spies, cops, and copyright lawyers.", ">>{baljeettjinder} : Some people on both sides however are definitely pro-privacy. Rand Paul is a republican and is the total opposite of this dude. Meanwhile it seems that burr's democratic challenger is also very pro-privacy", '>>{analyticheir} : This is certainly not the tune I thought they\'d try and sing.. I figured they would be parroting the "this looks good for Trump" shit for at least another day.', ">>{stormcrowsx} : Voting just to turn the country blue isn't a wise idea. For instance, from the privacy perspective I'd prefer Kentucky stay red with Rand Paul. Vote on the issues that matter to you not on the color of the candidate. Hell Hillary is fairly anti-privacy on encryption, I wouldn't want a senate that is an ally to her on that issue. On this particular case though it does seem like Ross > Burr. But that's not everywhere.", ">>{Words_are_Windy} : This is good news, but I'm guessing it's more backlash against the North Carolina legislature's constant attempts to disenfranchise minority voters more than an issue over encryption.", ">>{Sarunae_} : >That Ross has gotten this close is amazing. Eh, it's not that surprising considering how badly the NCGOP has been doing this year. Between the Trumptanic, the HB2 disaster, and the entire voter ID clusterfuck that's been going around NC, it's been basically serving all as a call-to-arms for Independents and Democrats to go out and vote the state blue.", ">>{pissbum-emeritus} : Millennials really want Hillary Clinton to get lost. They know she's a corrupt lying sack of shit and reject her.", '>>{LeftousCrusader} : Hopefully Hillary can at least recognize that **she** needs strong encryption. She\'s an elitist, though, so she\'ll probably lean towards the "magical intention detector" based version of encryption (back doors) rather than coming to grips with the fact that **everyone** needs strong encryption.', '>>{rush42} : Go Sean go!! He is the only one brave enough to call out the alt left on their constant attempts to sabotage our POTUS.', ">>{Claritypleas} : > I don't understand how regulations are being measured in terms of dollar amounts. Exactly. This has been a tactic of the anti-regulatory people forever. It is bogus.", ">>{Improvised0} : I don't think they want Trump either. If you're a Millennial, you're gonna have a bad time.", '>>{youareaspastic} : -man exposed to reddit echo chamber for too long', '>>{cjluthy} : Sounds to me like the voting machines in NC have a date with The Equation Group.', ">>{dailydamage} : Technically a millennial can be in their early 30s. And plenty of us aren't that into Warren as vp. Trumps main demo is white men. Thus Hillary should pick a white man for VP. It may sound lame but come on, it's the vice presidency. Dick Cheney was a vice president, Joe biden, Palin was a nominee.....", ">>{pizzashill} : The thing about regulations in those countries is they're often not actually enforced. China has real problems with this. China has so many god damn people scattered all over the place a lot of sketchy shit happens.", ">>{stormcrowsx} : I believe she currently wants encryption but then she also wants a back door for FBI etc. I don't think she fully understands that once that back door is found, anyone can walk through it. Or as is the case with many politicians, she is not qualified enough to make decisions about encryption.", ">>{rileyrulesu} : Mine either! Primarily because I live in Florida, but it's the thought that counts, right?", ">>{spew2014} : I presume, without taking the time to read their actual report, they're looking at the cost shared by industry, consumers and government of complying with new environmental regulations. If that's the case, then it would be important to know how they calculate this cost, whether it's opportunity cost or actual cost and whether it's over a term period. This is a stupidly broad assertion that really has no business in the news media without a significant effort to unpack how it was calculated.", ">>{AlayneKr} : Did it cost the government $890 Billion? Or did it cost various companies $890 Billion? That number could be correct, but the article isn't clear at all as to WHO it exactly cost.", '>>{Projectrage} : Trump administration might have leaked 2005 tax information. http://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/14/trump-may-have-leaked-his-own-tax-return-award-winning-journalist-says.html', '>>{Cardenjs} : Jihad means "struggle" and by that definition everyone except for half of FOX is participating', ">>{DragoneerFA} : If Hannity speaks out about it may spur to do something about it (not that he can). I'd love to see Trump try to take this on, only to end up tripping over the Constitution he's constantly stepping on.", '>>{rush42} : Go Sean go!! He is the only one brave enough to call out the alt left on their constant attempts to sabotage our POTUS.', ">>{rush42} : Well.....the tax documents were LEAKED weren't they? Trump didn't provide them? So in effect whoever leaked them was in the wrong. And there is nothing in the constitution about the president releasing his tax returns.", '>>{playvoid} : Of course this gets downvoted to hell. Replace Obama with Trump and this would be on the top page of this sub. Disgusting.', '>>{iiig} : Based on the fact that Russian state-sponsored hackers successfully compromised their security? In that case, neither is the NSA.', ">>{mr_shortypants} : I actually think Warren would be more effective in the Senate, and it seems she'd prefer to remain a leader in the Senate. Of the people frequently mentioned as part of her shortlist, I'm hoping for Castro or Perez.", ">>{DragoneerFA} : Yeah, but the media didn't leak them. Someone leaked them TO them, and they have rights under the First Amendment to report on what was provided. This is the same reason the media was allowed to report on Wikileaks, or what Snowden posted. It's legal. So, yeah, whoever leaked them was legally in the wrong, but it's not Maddow, Johnston or anyone at NBC.", '>>{EmperorMarcus} : Reddit facebook and real life experiences with fellow millennials i suppose', '>>{cybexg} : It is a meaningless number since the purpose and beneficial effect of a regulation needs to be stated and taken into account when evaluating the cost of a regulation.', ">>{Socrates_Burrito} : Nope. If you're going to pick a progressive who may lose a Senate seat pick Sherrod Brown. He would lock down Ohio and Pennsylvania and ensure a left wing VP is on the ticket. I doubt that happens but just a thought. Either way, Warren is best served taking on the banks in the Senate.", '>>{rush42} : That was years ago. The left needs to hang it up already.', '>>{miltedmalkball} : I\'m not sure about what "the left" thinks (you\'d have to ask them), but it seems to me we shouldn\'t "hang up" blatant lies, whether told by media personalities or politicians. A liar is and should always be less eligible for the benefit of the doubt.', ">>{drsjsmith} : /r/UnexpectedHamilton >But when all is said and all is done >Jefferson has beliefs. Burr has none Or, from the source document: >Mr. Burr loves nothing but himself-Thinks of nothing but his own aggrandizement--and will be content with nothing short of permanent power in his own hands.--No compact, that he should make with any passion in his breast except Ambition, could be relied upon by himself. Senator Richard Burr's [great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandfather was Benjamin Burr.](http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~battle/senators/burr.htm) Benjamin Burr's [brother was Jehue Burr Sr.; Jehue Burr Sr.'s son was immigrant Jehu Burr.](http://www.burrcook.com/history/burr.html) Vice President Aaron Burr's [great-grandfather was the same immigrant Jehu Burr.](http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~dav4is/ODTs/BURR.shtml#BURR100) That makes Senator Richard Burr the fourth cousin, seven times removed of Vice President Aaron Burr.", ">>{churikadeva} : Man the day Burr gets out of the Senate I will be a happy man... Even though Kay Hagen was a Democrat I'm glad she's gone as well...she was pushing for all those net neutrality killing bills.", ">>{JohnRyanFan} : You know what costs the taxpayers a lot more than 890 billion dollars, when financial institutions collapse because of deregulation. It also costs the taxpayers when people get sick because of poor air quality due to environmental deregulation. Or when we have to clean up after corporations who dump their waste. Or when consumers are taken advantage of through predatory lending...and so on. Corporations can't be trusted in a capitalist system. Regulation is absolutely necessary. The cost to regulate on the taxpayer is minuscule compared to the consequences of deregulation.", ">>{LeftousCrusader} : Perhaps someone could make it plain to her with the aid of these cartoons that I found on Bruce Schneier's web site: * http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?id=4083 * https://www.truthdig.com/cartoon/item/digital_back_door_20160307 * https://twitter.com/danielsolove/status/701729120812597248 (the post: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2016/04/encryption_back_1.html)", '>>{Jwalla83} : > That makes Senator Richard Burr the fourth cousin, seven times removed of Vice President Aaron Burr. Aha! Political dynasty! Nepotism! Corruption!', ">>{Rupperrt} : How often have you be to China or India? India is actually a nightmare of regulations and bureaucracy. China is steering everything, they give a lot of slack too but especially with environmental regulations they've really stepped on the pedal lately.", ">>{pizzashill} : I know the regulations exist, but they're hard to enforce in a lot of places. http://www.latitudenews.com/story/chinas-development-factories-injury-epidemic/ illegal factories, for example.", ">>{toadfan64} : Well, I guess that means she for sure won't be picking her then.", ">>{janiceNaccounting} : Yeah, there are Democrats on the ballot in November who don't just have bad stances when it comes to these issues, but some clearly have a poor understanding of them. Vote for candidates who share your views (left or right), and if neither candidate does try to vote for people who are willing to at least educate themselves on matters that are important to you.", ">>{AlayneKr} : Cool your jets there partner. I'm sure some down votes are because of that, but if you read some comments, they are all confused as to what exactly this article is talking about. It's not really specific at all.", '>>{NotFooledbyFools} : It means that coal plants had to pay for their messes instead of just dumping them.', '>>{Publius_Jr} : It seems that they are pulling the estimates from the Federal Register\'s documents on the estimated costs of the individual programs. I\'ve only looked at a couple of them so far but here\'s an example.... **From the study, claims $191.2M cost for Conservation Reserve Program.** http://regrodeo.com/?year%5B0%5D=2009&regulation=Conservation%20Reserve%20Program--2009--191200000 **Relevant section of the federal register:** >"Based on estimates concerning the amount of land that will be eligible, assumed participation rates and annual enrollment, and estimated per-acre costs, the costs of implementing the changes considered in the interim rule are estimated to total $79.6 million through FY 2012 and **$191.2 million through FY 2018.** This averages to $19.1 million per year over 10 years. The estimated costs of the changes made by the 2008 Farm Bill and implemented in this rule are provided in table 2:" https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2009/06/29/E9-15305/conservation-reserve-program The question, of course, is not whether or not regulations cost money because we know they do. The question is whether or not the cost is justified. It\'s easy to just say "Big scary number! Be angry!" but people need to stop to actually see what the benefits are of those actions. I\'m open to taking in more information, but I largely agreed with the steps the Obama administration took. EDIT: Also, they\'re not using the annualized numbers in the headline, which would make more sense and, obviously, would be much smaller.', ">>{LeftousCrusader} : > That makes Senator Richard Burr the fourth cousin, seven times removed of Vice President Aaron Burr. I've never understood the southern calculus of cousining. ELI5?", '>>{drsjsmith} : John Burr (b. 1726) and Vice President Aaron Burr had the same great-great-great-grandfather. Having the same grandfather makes you first cousins; having the same great-grandfather makes you second cousins; having the same great-great-grandfather makes you third cousins; having the same great-great-great-great grandfather makes you fourth cousins. John Burr (b. 1726) was Senator Richard Burr\'s great-great-great-great-great-grandfather, that is, seven generations back. The seven generations are where we get "seven times removed". Whether the shared male ancestor also includes the same wife of that shared male ancestor appears to be unknown, so these could all be half-fourth cousins or full fourth cousins.', '>>{LeftousCrusader} : Thank you for making the effort to explain that to me.', ">>{Rupperrt} : Yeah, you're right, I guess working regulations haven't really been a focus yet. I was more thinking of environmental ones to be honest. (because those are the ones threatened in the US) However, people get away with fewer and fewer over there. It's crazy how fast things happened.", ">>{contemptorary} : I sent her a few bucks. Even if she weren't on the same side of an issue I care about, I like to see some turnover in the Senate. It's not meant to be a defacto lifetime appointment, made on the basis of name recognition.", ">>{F22Rapture} : The copyright industry kinda relies on encryption... It's the basis for DRM.", ">>{LeftousCrusader} : DRM is a failed effort to put the math on their side. It could only succeed if they get to decide what runs on our computers, and that means making the Trusted Computing Initiative into an enforceable law. The criminal sanctions for file sharing in the TPP are their last shot. If TPP goes down, they will continue trying to get those sanctions written into US law by hook or by crook. Enforcing that law will be hideously expensive because detecting an infraction will be hideously difficult unless encryption is outlawed. So that's what to expect from the copyright industry: simultaneous advocacy for the Trusted Computing Initiative and weaker encryption.", '>>{CylonbabyLiam} : Over almost anyone else in congress, these anti-internet privacy bastards have got to get ousted, if we want to set good tech precedents for tomorrow.', '>>{pizzashill} : They have been making great progress. Especially in the "fake food" industry. The environmental regulations and health care regulations aren\'t things China has a choice in though. They have a massive population and pollution/healthcare problems hit them crazy hard. They\'re highly motivated.', ">>{MagaMagaChooChoo} : Burr is small potatoes. We should really be going after Dianne Feinstein D-CA. She's the one behind the big push to outlaw encryption. I have called to voice my displeasure several times this year. A Republican will never be able to unseat her in California, so it's up to you Liberals to primary her out and clean up your trash. We can all agree that this is a bipartisan issue, right?", '>>{Rupperrt} : Yep, and pressured from the in China new phenomena of middle class nimby-ism. Not everyone wants a coal power plant in their garden. There are over 5000 demonstrations a year most of them against building projects and pollution.', '>>{LittleShrub} : In other words ... a small price to pay.', '>>{TheScamr} : If Warren joins her ticket I will lose all respect for her.', '>>{CylonbabyLiam} : Let\'s turn this country the color of representative that won\'t vote against privacy. Dianne Feinstein has been trying to beat down internet privacy protections for years, in the name of her copyright industry and telecom industry backers. She was one of the leading forces behind SOPA and PIPA. She wanted to see Snowden brought to "justice" in the United States, for his exposure of the NSA. She is an enemy of technological liberty, and outspoken about her preferences, but this receives *very* little coverage because of her party affiliation. The majority of Clinton\'s views on privacy mimic hers. People like this in either party need to be stopped.', '>>{PM_ME_DEAD_FASCISTS} : The fake food thing is so crazy to me. The bootleg cooking oil and stuff, ugh fucking disgusting. Shows what people will do without regulation.', '>>{nerdmann13} : CRP is also a totally voluntary program for enrollment, predates Obama by quite a bit and is funded through the Farm Bill so if that is included I would heavily question anything else as CRP is not even a regulation. Source: I enroll people in CRP.', '>>{Mallardy} : > The question, of course, is not whether or not regulations cost money because we know they do. The question is whether or not the cost is justified. It\'s easy to just say "Big scary number! Be angry!" but people need to stop to actually see what the benefits are of those actions. It\'s incredibly dishonest to refer to the "costs" of regulation without considering the *opportunity costs* of *not* having those regulations.', ">>{asher1611} : Deborah Ross is legit. Don't get me wrong, Richard Burr is bad, but he's not Jesse Helms, Sue Myrick, or Virginia Foxx level horrible. But he has fallen lockstep into the tea party line (which anyone who thought about it for 5 seconds could have predicted). He doesn't represent NC's interests. I'd be happy enough to vote him out as is. But Ross actually has a good platform of her own. It's nice in this election to actually be voting for somebody somewhere on the ticket.", ">>{asher1611} : Agreed. I'm tired of so many tech illiterate NC legislators who end up in positions that control law and policy on tech. Mel Watt is another horrifying example.", '>>{TheRighteousTyrant} : >The copyright industry is doomed. Their business model demands that making a copy of intellectual property implies giving them money, but the entire purpose of information technology is to make copying information free and easy. What about the cost of *producing* that information? This conundrum is why journalism sucks so badly these days, no one but advertisers want to pay these groups for actually creating content.', '>>{mrs_bungle} : Economically illiterate think tank making up numbers because their corporate donors want them too. Why is this seen as remotely credible ?', ">>{LeftousCrusader} : We do not need them. What information technology has done to the cost of manufacturing physical goods it has done even harder to the cost of creating intellectual property. As things stand, US IP law is the establishment's last line of defense against the intelligence and creativity of the crowd.", ">>{NateBronze} : As a Millennial, I'm having a great time.", '>>{dskatz2} : Well, probably that and the LBGT bathroom bill, and general downballot losses from Trump.', '>>{tigerscomeatnight} : What you are saying is correct. The media (music, video and to some extent books) industry used to be a distribution model business. With the advent of the internet and digitization it has become merely a copying industry. I heard a story one time that helped understand this. Back before things could be copied exactly (before Xerox® brand copying machines, before Gutenburg?) if somebody made something, say an arrow for their bow, it couldn\'t be stolen. If they shot it, anyone who saw it would say "there\'s Running Bear\'s arrow". If you tried to steal it people would just say "why do you have Running Bear\'s arrow?". There could be no theft within the village (maybe food but not objects) because everything was individualized, nothing was an exact copy of anything, everything was hand made (or made individualized by nature) and there was nothing "generic". There\'s probably some philosophical argument that can be made with regards to genericization and society and "Plato\'s cave" or "das Ding an sich", but I\'ll leave that for now. Edit: [This](http://qz.com/767812/millennial-whoop/) is probably the result of genericization.', '>>{NateBronze} : -Hillary supporter exposed to /r/HillaryClinton for too long', ">>{rootkeycompromise} : For the sake of, and right to, privacy everywhere: Go vote! His voter segment surely will do and it's so nice to see so many incumbents getting challenged on the meaningless claims they have repeated for years.", ">>{biogeochemist} : I'm on this boat. I think she has more power on the CFPB than she would as VP and seems better placed in Congress to help pass progressive legislation.", '>>{Socrates_Burrito} : Perez is a solid pick. His stump speeches as the keynote speaker at the WI, VA and WA state conventions over the last couple months were very well received. He brings a lot of energy and is comfortable in the role of attack dog. And who better to speak to the working class voters of the Rust Belt than the Secretary of Labor? He may not end up as VP but i could see him as Attorney General.', ">>{Socrates_Burrito} : Lol exposed to polls too long that show that Millennials are voting for her in large numbers. Under 30 voters are her strongest demographic compared to Trump. In the latest YouGov poll, she's +19 with Under 30 voters, +6 with 30-44, -2 with 45-64, and -3 with 65+ (+3 overall). See Page 2: http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/sqfo3wfe7o/weekly_presidential_election_tracking_report.pdf", ">>{mikelieman} : I really want Hillary Clinton to appoint Warren to TREASURY, where she can bitch-slap the nation's banks into obedience.", ">>{thx1138jr} : Thanks for this explanation. I couldn't figure out what the point of the story was.", '>>{330mod87} : I wonder how many of these congress people will complain when their credit cards and social security numbers keep getting stolen from weakened encryption?', '>>{Calamity_Jesus} : Yeah, people are starting to confuse us (Best Carolina) with Worst Carolina. Last week I had to correct someone on reddit that made a (upvoted) claim that NC was the first state to seceed (hint: we were one of the last).', ">>{berrieh} : They're actually being enforced more and more in China, though. If you compare the China of the early 2000s with where they are now, regulation enforcement is a very different beast.", ">>{TheRighteousTyrant} : So when my friend's band is trying to sell records, they shouldn't be getting paid for their time and effort making that music? Where do you draw the line?", '>>{estrangedeskimo} : We *were* however the first to declare independence from Britain.', ">>{Areonis} : Feinstein is 83. I'd bet on her retiring when her term is up at the end of 2018, so the important part for Californians will be to elect a new Senator who is against the anti-encryption movement.", ">>{fudsaf} : Totally. NC is such a promising state with some exceptional people, huge commerce, and dedicated progressives. We're completely wingclipped by awful politicians like McCrory and Burr. Seriously hoping for a sea change this November. As a Charlotte resident, I'm very hopeful about our future!", '>>{330mod87} : This article puts that into perspective. [Hillary Clinton wants “Manhattan-like project” to break encryption](http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/12/hillary-clinton-wants-manhattan-like-project-to-break-encryption/) No politician should make any decisions about technology without consulting with professionals/scholars first.', ">>{Self_Manifesto} : I'm just as proud as the next North Carolinian, but the evidence for the Mecklenburg Resolves is really thin.", ">>{AdalineMaj} : She lost me when she started calling Scott Brown a loser. She beat Scott Brown. Show some class. To me she's Bernie light.", ">>{American_FETUS} : No they don't. If they cared about HRC vp pick they would have to give a shit about HRC.", ">>{science_abroad} : They've also stepped up on foreign business visas. I'm not saying it's relevant or good, but when they decide to do something, they do really do it.", ">>{LeftousCrusader} : It's stupid for an individual band to try selling records. Tell your friend to sell performances and crowd fund whatever recordings he/she/nonbinary needs to promote those performances.", ">>{Fellidae} : People will still pay creators for work, even when they don't have to. (No source don't quote me and call bullshit if you like) I believe that some research had shown that even though people are pirating more music, that even as piracy goes up, so do profits, because people finding new music still contribute money to bands or music that they like. I don't remember any specific study but it seems to be in like with my experience. If I have money to give, I'll buy afford out a digital album from artists I like.", '>>{sign_in_or_sign_up} : yeah, and then croak one day after the election.', ">>{TheRighteousTyrant} : They do all that too; that isn't the point of the question, it's dodging the question. What about privately-funded works of research? If I spend a year researching and writing a book, should I not be entitled to sell the result of that work? Edit: funny how y'all are downvoting but not addressing this second paragraph.", '>>{nicfic} : Came here to make sure there were the necessary Hamilton references... Thanks for meeting my expectations. Something about shots and rooms where it happens, etc.', ">>{A_Crabby_Patty} : Complying with regulations costs money. You have to hire employees and consultants to deal with the regulation, implement new systems. Shit's expensive.", '>>{optimusderp} : A fabulous time, i dont know but thats what people are telling me. Now china...are gonna have a very bad time.', '>>{jurrasicUser} : Solve overpopulation and increase profits at the same time.', '>>{petecash} : Polling shows clinton leading in millenials easily so uhh wat', ">>{A_Crabby_Patty} : Whenever you make new rules, it's going to take time and effort to follow them. I can't think of one example of a new regulation that took now time, money or effort to comply with.", '>>{TheRighteousTyrant} : Same, but I\'d qualify that first sentence with "some people" because obviously not everyone will, freeloaders are a thing.', '>>{lout_zoo} : Can we please get rid of them both? She is the epitome of everything that is wrong with the Democratic Party. Besides Hillary.', '>>{JLord} : You could, for example, make a new regulation that forbids tax audits from taking place on corporations. Nobody would have to spend any money complying with it.', '>>{team_satan} : >The question, of course, is not whether or not regulations cost money because we know they do. The question is whether or not the cost is justified. It\'s easy to just say "Big scary number! Be angry!" but people need to stop to actually see what the benefits are of those actions. If you link through to the source study then you see that there is about $450B benefit per year from the regulations. It remains unclear to me what period of time the cost is assessed over.', '>>{lout_zoo} : That only solves half the problem. Democrats like Hillary, Diane Feinstein and Nancy Pelosi are the other half working for the plutocracy and against freedom.', ">>{wrestlingchampo} : Of course Millenials are going to vote for her when you have a hypothetical situation where they can only vote for her, or Trump. Millenials hate Trump. Why aren't you trying to explain why Millenials hated her in the primary?", ">>{lout_zoo} : Let's do our best to make sure every cent Art Pope spends is wasted. Of course then we'll have the herculian task of getting the Democrats to actually support the people.", '>>{gaeuvyen} : Yeah considering the VP only has 2 jobs. Just being there in case the president dies or steps down, and casting the tie breaking vote in the Senate.', ">>{PooOnYoureFoot} : The legislature of NC is trying to fuck everyone in the state... not just minority voters. It's literally the entire state pushing back against them to some degree.", ">>{PlanetStarbux} : Elections like this are why everyone should register and vote. Yes, you should vote for president...but it's the races like this that make a real difference. Your vote is much more important as you go down the ballot. Senators and Reps are the ones actually making laws...it's important on the Federal level, and an order of magnitude more important to you on the state, county, and city level.", ">>{funnymerikan} : The election is fake. Warren is a part of that show. Bernie's campaign was fake. He's pretty much all but told his supporters that now by endorsing Clinton after never really substantively challenging her. I think if there should be a message older folks should be telling younger folks, (now being branded 'millennials'), it's that it's okay for you to admit that you got tricked. It happened to older folks too when we were younger. Please realize, the people who run this corrupt shithole would never in a million years allow for someone who was genuinely trying to make real change appear on your TV screen or be talked about as a viable candidate in their controlled press. Bernie Sander's marketed 'change you can believe in'. If you don't understand what this is than I have a bridge in Brooklyn that you need to hear about. All you folks on here trying to continue supporting this election as real are doing a great service to the corrupt elite. It is all bullshit.", '>>{Trimblco} : > Voting just to turn the country blue isn\'t a wise idea. For instance, from the privacy perspective I\'d prefer Kentucky stay red with Rand Paul. Single-issue voting isn\'t a wise idea, imo. You may get some good ideas on privacy from Rand Paul, but you also get him voting for Mitch McConnell as majority leader, who sets the agenda in the senate and opposes Paul on those issues and makes sure they rarely come up for a vote. You also get him voting for conservative supreme court justices who rule in favor of the government in 4th amendment cases. You also get anti-gay bigotry, increase in income inequality through a conservative tax cuts for the rich, support for voter ID laws, desire to abolish the department of education, and vocal support of citizens united. > I do however agree with Citizens United, in that I think speech, whether you pay for it or not, is speech. That\'s only the tip of the iceberg with Rand Paul. Outside of the 4th amendment, he\'s just a standard tea party republican. I say this as a public defender, and the 4th amendment and criminal justice reform in general is by far my most important issue when selecting a candidate. But I could never support Rand Paul. I\'d take his opponent Jim Gray any day of the week--and Gray voting for a progressive justice on the court would go much further than any speech Rand Paul has given on the issue. That\'s why "turning the country blue" is important this election, especially on issues that play out in the courts. We need a progressive senate to gain a progressive supreme court.', '>>{Spritzer784030} : Wow! 7,000 views in 2 months! There\'s a video on YouTube where a kid wearing skeleton face paint saying "I like turtles!" Is more popular than that. There are videos made to put people to sleep that are more popular than that. There are videos industrial equipment that are more popular than that. She sure knows how to connect with millennials, alright! Way to prove someone\'s point by trying to disprove it.', '>>{Spritzer784030} : No amount of Trump can make Clinton appealing. No amount of Warren can make Clinton appealing. Hillary is an obviously terrible choice and I will be voting for Jill Stein in November.', ">>{mr_shortypants} : Millennial here - I caucused for O'Malley. My preferred candidate didn't win the Democratic Presidential primaries, but my preferred candidate did win her Senate primary, though. You win some you lose some. That's life. I'll still be voting in November.", ">>{Socrates_Burrito} : Ummm the scenario wasn't her or Trump. It was her, Trump, Johnson or Stein. So you're wrong. And I wouldn't say they hated her in the primary. They just definitely loved Bernie. Big difference. As can be seen by their willingness to move over to Clinton in the general.", ">>{Spritzer784030} : Welp, this is embarrassing, but it's important to admit when one is wrong and I was wrong. Took away my own upvote and gave myself a downvote for being an assuming jerk. For those wondering, the video turns out to be an on-point parody of why there are so few millennial Clinton supporters.", ">>{jmcgit} : A popular band can self-produce and they'll be fine because they're already popular. Do you know what the record industry did? They would discover young, new artists with potential, finance their career, promote them, and set up their tour. In exchange, they get a significant amount of the revenue. Today? Bands never get that label support, so they never have enough money to market themselves to a mainstream audience. It takes ten years to build a decent following as a band these days. The Beatles' entire career was ten years, but if they started playing music today, nobody would have heard of them, having broken up before anybody noticed. Seriously, who is your favorite musician younger than 27 years old? You might be able to find a marketable young pop singer in that range, but if you're not into pop or rap you may not even be able to think of someone. Jimi Hendrix was dead, his career complete, at that age.", ">>{stormcrowsx} : I don't follow local Kentucky politics closely but I based my opinion on him under the assumption that like most of the Southeastern region the politicians who support the baptist views are far more likely to get elected. If we gotta have someone religious, Rand Paul, is not too bad.", ">>{Fellidae} : I don't know the age of the heads of most music I listen to. You seem to make the pretty large assumption that pop music is the only music to exist, and indie record labels don't exist. I listen to a lot of music that probably won't get mainstream attention (hipster what the fuck ever, I'm just being honest) even if they were to get a big record label. Instrumental music? I don't know of any station near me that isn't classical music that plays solely instrumental music. I think that with the internet being able to get smaller bands out there, big record labels aren't so important to finding a fan base. Sure, the Beatles needed a record label, because accessing people was more difficult. We have the internet now. Sending someone some music I found I'd absurdly easy and musicians can hit it big with Just a YouTube channel. FUCK, HAS EVERYONE ALREADY FORGOTTEN HOW JUSTIN BIEBER MADE IT BIG?", '>>{LeftousCrusader} : There is currently no viable market for renting copies of digital IP to individual consumers and no such market will arise. The business plan that evolved around that market died when everyone became a publisher by buying mass information copying devices. What our IP law does now is prevent small operators from reaching large audiences.', '>>{Trimblco} : Oh sure, vote for him in the GOP primary. But against an actual progressive in the general election, why not vote for the progressive?', ">>{let_them_eat_slogans} : > They do all that too Then that's how they get paid for their time and effort. What's the problem?", '>>{TheRighteousTyrant} : That that\'s not really a sustainable model, neither for them nor for others who live by intellectual creations, like authors, who cannot "perform" a book.', ">>{MagaMagaChooChoo} : Oh yeah for sure. I'm just making sure the liberals on this sub understand that it won't stop with Burr. The ringmaster is a Democrat so they otherwise wouldn't hear it from the corporatist liberal media.", ">>{TheRighteousTyrant} : I never said anything about renting. What are you on about? Blockbuster is dead, I get that and I'm not trying to resurrect it nor its business model.", ">>{MagaMagaChooChoo} : Establishment Democrats generally groom their replacements, the next one after Feinstein will continue her efforts unless there is regime change through primary or a Republican replaces her (even that's not a guarantee). A primary loss for Feinstein with this as a central issue is the only way.", ">>{let_them_eat_slogans} : > That that's not really a sustainable model In what sense? I see plenty of artists following this model successfully. For authors, there are book readings and signings and the like to serve as an analogue, and crowd funding is there for them too. But partly, we have to recognize that technology has vastly lowered the barriers to entry in these fields. Every creator has free worldwide distribution at their fingertips, musicians no longer need to rent an expensive studio to record, writers no longer need to pay a factory to print copies of their books, and hence the fields have become vastly more competitive. It is no longer realistic, if it ever was, to expect to make a profitable or self-sustaining living simply by writing or making music. The demand simply can't come close to keeping up with the gluttonous supply.", '>>{LtSqueak} : If the copyright industry wants weaker encryption, they need to start by putting their money where there mouth is. Fair use laws say that I should be able to back up my movies for my own personal use, but in order to do so currently, I would have to crack the DRM, which is currently against the law due to being considered hacking. File sharing already has laws against it. Why the need for the continued use of DRM?', '>>{TheRighteousTyrant} : >> That that\'s not really a sustainable model >In what sense? I see plenty of artists following this model successfully. To the point that they are making a living just from that? Doubtful. And why shouldn\'t they be able to? >For authors, there are book readings and signings and the like to serve as an analogue Why should they have to do this rather than just be able to sell the product of their work? Can you answer that? > musicians no longer need to rent an expensive studio to record Oh lord, you don\'t know what you\'re talking about. Sure, you can do a pretty good job at home playing guitar into your computer but there\'s no replacement for a good studio and properly miced gear, especially when it comes to drums and vocals. > The demand simply can\'t come close to keeping up with the gluttonous supply. The fact that people continue to pirate music despite a "gluttonous supply" of free stuff kinda suggests otherwise. Most of what\'s out there for free is garbage. Put another way, there may be a glut of recordings (and writings and drawings and paintings and whatever), but not one of real talent.', ">>{jmcgit} : Under no circumstances am I saying that pop music is the only music to exist. I'm saying that for everything that isn't pop music, anything different, there's no support system for it anymore. Your last paragraph, with the internet being able to get small bands out there, I touched on that in my last post. It works, but the problem is that it takes a really long time for a band to develop even a moderately successful following that way. It doesn't help that most of the music that's spread on the internet is consumed on the internet. There's no money in recording, all the money is on touring. Only problem is, in order to tour, you need money, and you need to be popular enough to be comfortable that you'll recoup your investment. Record labels didn't only provide significant help top 40 acts like the way it is today. That's a post-Napster phenomena.", ">>{Calamity_Jesus} : Well, our colonists were the first to nope out of the UK's big brother surveillance program. #Croatoan #NeverForget", ">>{ImVeryOffended} : ...and yet we're about to elect one of two other foes of encryption president, and companies like Google and Facebook are putting their full support behind one of them.", ">>{RheagarTargaryen} : I don't mind Rand Paul. He reasonable on many issue and is pretty anti war. He isn't afraid to vote against party lines. He also takes the time to read bills before voting on them. If the dems are contesting seats, his seat shouldn't be too priority.", '>>{let_them_eat_slogans} : > To the point that they are making a living just from that? Doubtful. And why shouldn\'t they be able to? As outlined previously, because of supply and demand. When there are thousand people providing the exact same service as you and willing to lose money to do it, then it doesn\'t make sense to expect to be able to make a living from it. > Why should they have to do this rather than just be able to sell the product of their work? Can you answer that? Because thanks to advancements in technology, the product of their work is infinitely available at zero cost. It has no real value in economic terms, so it\'s not reasonable to expect to be able to profit from it. It\'s like trying to sell air. > Oh lord, you don\'t know what you\'re talking about. Sure, you can do a pretty good job at home playing guitar into your computer but there\'s no replacement for a good studio and properly miced gear, especially when it comes to drums and vocals. Having been through this process enough times myself, I\'d like to think that I have some idea of what I\'m talking about. Sure, expensive studio and staff can help, but when it comes down to the final product we\'re at the point where the listener can no longer tell the difference between an expensive studio project and an album recorded in someone\'s living room. > The fact that people continue to pirate music despite a "gluttonous supply" of free stuff kinda suggests otherwise. Most of what\'s out there for free is garbage. You can listen to practically anything for free on Youtube. And I don\'t think it\'s useful for you to bring your own subjective musical tastes into the discussion. You might think an artist is garbage, another person might think they are fantastic.', ">>{TheRighteousTyrant} : My bad on the wrong assumption there. Good points, can't really argue with most of that. Except: >And I don't think it's useful for you to bring your own subjective musical tastes into the discussion. You might think an artist is garbage, another person might think they are fantastic. I'm really not, because I obviously haven't listened to everything out there. Most people just aren't going to be good musicians (or writers or whatever) and with previous entry barriers that helped separate the wheat from the chaff now gone, there's going to be a bigger percentage of crap out there than before.", '>>{LeftousCrusader} : Everyone whose business model involves licensing IP to consumers is doomed.', ">>{TheRighteousTyrant} : Well here's hoping that quality doesn't suffer as a result.", ">>{let_them_eat_slogans} : That's not something that I can argue against, because it's based on your own subjective idea of what is good and what is crap.", '>>{TheRighteousTyrant} : I think many of us have been doing our best to forget Justin Bieber, period.', ">>{rendeld} : people just want stuff for free, they want to be able to pirate it. they don't intend on paying the content creators because they feel entitled to all content.", ">>{TheRighteousTyrant} : Let me put it another way. Most acts out there aren't going to get popular and make it big. That's not me making a subjective judgment about quality, that's a result of everyone that is exposed to them doing so.", ">>{rendeld} : flume... but the electronic music industry works very differently from the normal record industry. the EDM world has embraced a new direction that emphasis live performances and uses the Internet to distribute free content while also keeping some of their content paid for (on Spotify, and other mediums that pay them). I don't know if it will work for all industries but the artists owning the labels and then promoting their artists alongside themselves has been working wonders for labels like Mad Decent, Owsla, and Spinnin'.", ">>{Codeshark} : It is on the state flag, and those can't lie.", ">>{cryopyre} : The industry is undergoing a cultural transformation. You may as well ask how one can have composers without nobles to patron them. People will always produce art, and to consider the form of compensation in place today necessary or ideal to stimulate that is silly. In many ways art has suffered and worsened under the mass media/IP system. Furthermore, there are creators who put immense amount of time into their work and can live off of donations. One's whose name was built off of their work. Toady, for example.", '>>{therealstupid} : As a native (and older) Californian, I thought it was a great thing when Feinstein was elected senator in 1992. And then when Barbra Boxer came in the very next year, I was proud to be in one of the first states (if not THE first) to have not one, but two, female senators serving at the same time. Well, it\'s been 24 years now. Those "progressive" 1992 views have been left by the wayside. I have to tip my hat to Ms. Boxer for stepping down after many years of service. Problem is that Feinstein is making far too much money from her position to ever consider doing the Right Thing and will milk the position for all its worth. She runs unopposed because if a challenger were to appear, her machine just offers them a bucket of money (and some sort of ridiculously overpaid job that requires almost no effort at all) and they quietly disappear into the shadows. There\'s no way to get her out short of electing a Republican and that\'s about as likely as California seceding. We\'re pretty much stuck with her until she dies, most likely. Having said that, she is 83. I expect only one or two more terms from her.', '>>{Codeshark} : A Republican replacing a Senator from California does not seem likely.', '>>{Codeshark} : I think Kay Hagan probably lost because she seemed really weak. Her commercial was basically "I have a D next to my name but I am not really a democrat" from my impression. I could be wrong, but "I am lukewarm" doesn\'t fire up the base.', '>>{MagaMagaChooChoo} : Yes, I agree. I say as much in my original comment.', ">>{chefr89} : It just ended up not being a great year for Dems, so I think national trends held true for NC as well. I was out of the country though with very limited access to the outside world, so I can't say I know the race's finer details too well", ">>{Codeshark} : Yeah, I was a little more politically involved, then. Her campaign seemed disorganized. That's sort of started to diminish.", ">>{Pabst_Blue_Gibbon} : CA is a jungle primary. The most progressive D will win the primary and the race, which is what happened/will happen this year. (Not that she's super liberal, but more liberal out of the 2 establishment Dems on the primary ballot.)", '>>{jacobolus} : Feinstein’s 1992 and 1994 campaigns were all about keeping Mexican immigrants out of California (after she got beat by Wilson in 1990 with his anti-immigrant campaign), with a nice assist from Bill Clinton (shame on him too). She was also “tough on crime” (pro death penalty, pro police, anti drug, etc.), and pro military. And a big promoter of CA agriculture in their fights against environmentalists. Pro business more generally. She was never especially “progressive”. I’d call her a mainstream centrist/corporate Democrat with authoritarian tendencies.', ">>{TitaniumDragon} : This view is advocated by no intelligent or creative people. Sad but true. The reality is that IP costs a lot of money to produce. Copyrights, patents, and trademarks all exist precisely *because* information is so easy to copy relative to products. The idea that information technology changes anything about this is completely wrong; it changes nothing. Books have always been easy to copy; they're even easier today. The reason copyrights exist is because it is so easy to copy intellectual property relative to the cost of creating it. The thing that pirates fear the most is the loss of anonymity on the Internet. Once that happens, it becomes very easy to find anyone who is violating the law and fine them or put them in jail. The reality is that this is what pirates really fear - the loss of online anonymity, because once they lose that, they lose their ability to break the law freely. The thing is, encryption and anonymity have nothing to do with each other; it is possible to encrypt information, and hide its content from everyone, while still exposing its origin and end points. In fact, all good cryptographic systems can be intercepted endlessly and reveal nothing about the contents of the package. Once pirates lose their anonymity, they're screwed. It doesn't matter what encryption they have.", ">>{katrina_pierson} : I'd pin it down to her lucking out and getting elected during a presidential election year (especially with that disastrous Dole atheist ad). Her reelection being as close as it was in 2014 during a heavily GOP year is a feat in itself."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{miryslough} : Hannity accuses NBC News of 'political jihad' after Trump tax leak", ">>{The_Distance_From} : I wonder if it's his thumblike shape that makes him go so far up trumps ass so easily.", ">>{miltedmalkball} : Wasn't he supposed to get waterboarded for charity or something? When is that happening?", '>>{orp0piru} : What goes around comes around. Call it asshole-grabbing.', '>>{analyticheir} : This is certainly not the tune I thought they\'d try and sing.. I figured they would be parroting the "this looks good for Trump" shit for at least another day.', '>>{rush42} : Go Sean go!! He is the only one brave enough to call out the alt left on their constant attempts to sabotage our POTUS.', '>>{Projectrage} : Trump administration might have leaked 2005 tax information. http://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/14/trump-may-have-leaked-his-own-tax-return-award-winning-journalist-says.html', '>>{Cardenjs} : Jihad means "struggle" and by that definition everyone except for half of FOX is participating', ">>{DragoneerFA} : If Hannity speaks out about it may spur to do something about it (not that he can). I'd love to see Trump try to take this on, only to end up tripping over the Constitution he's constantly stepping on.", '>>{rush42} : Go Sean go!! He is the only one brave enough to call out the alt left on their constant attempts to sabotage our POTUS.', ">>{rush42} : Well.....the tax documents were LEAKED weren't they? Trump didn't provide them? So in effect whoever leaked them was in the wrong. And there is nothing in the constitution about the president releasing his tax returns.", ">>{DragoneerFA} : Yeah, but the media didn't leak them. Someone leaked them TO them, and they have rights under the First Amendment to report on what was provided. This is the same reason the media was allowed to report on Wikileaks, or what Snowden posted. It's legal. So, yeah, whoever leaked them was legally in the wrong, but it's not Maddow, Johnston or anyone at NBC.", '>>{rush42} : That was years ago. The left needs to hang it up already.', '>>{miltedmalkball} : I\'m not sure about what "the left" thinks (you\'d have to ask them), but it seems to me we shouldn\'t "hang up" blatant lies, whether told by media personalities or politicians. A liar is and should always be less eligible for the benefit of the doubt.'], ['>>{backpackwayne} : So do a lot of us old farts. I love the way she goes after Trump.', ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : Lol. But they won't vote for them, they're going to be too busy wringing their hands and playing Pokémon Go.", ">>{stop-being-poor} : please don't give in to these SJWs, Hillary. They're just going to vote for puppy-pushed Jill Stein anyways. May as well get Tim Kaine through the door.", ">>{pissbum-emeritus} : Millennials really want Hillary Clinton to get lost. They know she's a corrupt lying sack of shit and reject her.", ">>{Improvised0} : I don't think they want Trump either. If you're a Millennial, you're gonna have a bad time.", '>>{youareaspastic} : -man exposed to reddit echo chamber for too long', ">>{dailydamage} : Technically a millennial can be in their early 30s. And plenty of us aren't that into Warren as vp. Trumps main demo is white men. Thus Hillary should pick a white man for VP. It may sound lame but come on, it's the vice presidency. Dick Cheney was a vice president, Joe biden, Palin was a nominee.....", ">>{mr_shortypants} : I actually think Warren would be more effective in the Senate, and it seems she'd prefer to remain a leader in the Senate. Of the people frequently mentioned as part of her shortlist, I'm hoping for Castro or Perez.", '>>{EmperorMarcus} : Reddit facebook and real life experiences with fellow millennials i suppose', ">>{Socrates_Burrito} : Nope. If you're going to pick a progressive who may lose a Senate seat pick Sherrod Brown. He would lock down Ohio and Pennsylvania and ensure a left wing VP is on the ticket. I doubt that happens but just a thought. Either way, Warren is best served taking on the banks in the Senate.", ">>{toadfan64} : Well, I guess that means she for sure won't be picking her then.", '>>{TheScamr} : If Warren joins her ticket I will lose all respect for her.', ">>{NateBronze} : As a Millennial, I'm having a great time.", '>>{NateBronze} : -Hillary supporter exposed to /r/HillaryClinton for too long', ">>{biogeochemist} : I'm on this boat. I think she has more power on the CFPB than she would as VP and seems better placed in Congress to help pass progressive legislation.", '>>{Socrates_Burrito} : Perez is a solid pick. His stump speeches as the keynote speaker at the WI, VA and WA state conventions over the last couple months were very well received. He brings a lot of energy and is comfortable in the role of attack dog. And who better to speak to the working class voters of the Rust Belt than the Secretary of Labor? He may not end up as VP but i could see him as Attorney General.', ">>{Socrates_Burrito} : Lol exposed to polls too long that show that Millennials are voting for her in large numbers. Under 30 voters are her strongest demographic compared to Trump. In the latest YouGov poll, she's +19 with Under 30 voters, +6 with 30-44, -2 with 45-64, and -3 with 65+ (+3 overall). See Page 2: http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/sqfo3wfe7o/weekly_presidential_election_tracking_report.pdf", ">>{mikelieman} : I really want Hillary Clinton to appoint Warren to TREASURY, where she can bitch-slap the nation's banks into obedience.", ">>{AdalineMaj} : She lost me when she started calling Scott Brown a loser. She beat Scott Brown. Show some class. To me she's Bernie light.", ">>{American_FETUS} : No they don't. If they cared about HRC vp pick they would have to give a shit about HRC.", '>>{sign_in_or_sign_up} : yeah, and then croak one day after the election.', '>>{optimusderp} : A fabulous time, i dont know but thats what people are telling me. Now china...are gonna have a very bad time.', '>>{petecash} : Polling shows clinton leading in millenials easily so uhh wat', ">>{wrestlingchampo} : Of course Millenials are going to vote for her when you have a hypothetical situation where they can only vote for her, or Trump. Millenials hate Trump. Why aren't you trying to explain why Millenials hated her in the primary?", '>>{gaeuvyen} : Yeah considering the VP only has 2 jobs. Just being there in case the president dies or steps down, and casting the tie breaking vote in the Senate.', ">>{funnymerikan} : The election is fake. Warren is a part of that show. Bernie's campaign was fake. He's pretty much all but told his supporters that now by endorsing Clinton after never really substantively challenging her. I think if there should be a message older folks should be telling younger folks, (now being branded 'millennials'), it's that it's okay for you to admit that you got tricked. It happened to older folks too when we were younger. Please realize, the people who run this corrupt shithole would never in a million years allow for someone who was genuinely trying to make real change appear on your TV screen or be talked about as a viable candidate in their controlled press. Bernie Sander's marketed 'change you can believe in'. If you don't understand what this is than I have a bridge in Brooklyn that you need to hear about. All you folks on here trying to continue supporting this election as real are doing a great service to the corrupt elite. It is all bullshit.", '>>{Spritzer784030} : Wow! 7,000 views in 2 months! There\'s a video on YouTube where a kid wearing skeleton face paint saying "I like turtles!" Is more popular than that. There are videos made to put people to sleep that are more popular than that. There are videos industrial equipment that are more popular than that. She sure knows how to connect with millennials, alright! Way to prove someone\'s point by trying to disprove it.', '>>{Spritzer784030} : No amount of Trump can make Clinton appealing. No amount of Warren can make Clinton appealing. Hillary is an obviously terrible choice and I will be voting for Jill Stein in November.', ">>{mr_shortypants} : Millennial here - I caucused for O'Malley. My preferred candidate didn't win the Democratic Presidential primaries, but my preferred candidate did win her Senate primary, though. You win some you lose some. That's life. I'll still be voting in November.", ">>{Socrates_Burrito} : Ummm the scenario wasn't her or Trump. It was her, Trump, Johnson or Stein. So you're wrong. And I wouldn't say they hated her in the primary. They just definitely loved Bernie. Big difference. As can be seen by their willingness to move over to Clinton in the general.", ">>{Spritzer784030} : Welp, this is embarrassing, but it's important to admit when one is wrong and I was wrong. Took away my own upvote and gave myself a downvote for being an assuming jerk. For those wondering, the video turns out to be an on-point parody of why there are so few millennial Clinton supporters."], ['>>{playvoid} : Obama issued more than $890 billion in regulations as president, study finds', ">>{pizzashill} : Honestly we don't need regulations. Corporations will self-regulate like they do in India and China. Sure, kids might be getting their heads chopped off by kite strings with Chinese glass, but hey, who cares.", ">>{JLord} : I don't understand how regulations are being measured in terms of dollar amounts. Is this an estimated economic impact, an amount of direct government spending, a reduction in government revenue, some combination of these?", '>>{BadChicken47} : >The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued $344 billion worth of regulations What is that even supposed to mean?', '>>{Cenbe2} : No context. No examples. Just raw numbers grabbed from nowhere. But stupid people and clever politicians will latch onto this and start regurgitating it ad nauseum.', '>>{Rupperrt} : China and India has implemented thousands of regulations by now. Will be fun to see if US ends up below their level.', ">>{Claritypleas} : > I don't understand how regulations are being measured in terms of dollar amounts. Exactly. This has been a tactic of the anti-regulatory people forever. It is bogus.", ">>{pizzashill} : The thing about regulations in those countries is they're often not actually enforced. China has real problems with this. China has so many god damn people scattered all over the place a lot of sketchy shit happens.", ">>{spew2014} : I presume, without taking the time to read their actual report, they're looking at the cost shared by industry, consumers and government of complying with new environmental regulations. If that's the case, then it would be important to know how they calculate this cost, whether it's opportunity cost or actual cost and whether it's over a term period. This is a stupidly broad assertion that really has no business in the news media without a significant effort to unpack how it was calculated.", ">>{AlayneKr} : Did it cost the government $890 Billion? Or did it cost various companies $890 Billion? That number could be correct, but the article isn't clear at all as to WHO it exactly cost.", '>>{playvoid} : Of course this gets downvoted to hell. Replace Obama with Trump and this would be on the top page of this sub. Disgusting.', '>>{cybexg} : It is a meaningless number since the purpose and beneficial effect of a regulation needs to be stated and taken into account when evaluating the cost of a regulation.', ">>{JohnRyanFan} : You know what costs the taxpayers a lot more than 890 billion dollars, when financial institutions collapse because of deregulation. It also costs the taxpayers when people get sick because of poor air quality due to environmental deregulation. Or when we have to clean up after corporations who dump their waste. Or when consumers are taken advantage of through predatory lending...and so on. Corporations can't be trusted in a capitalist system. Regulation is absolutely necessary. The cost to regulate on the taxpayer is minuscule compared to the consequences of deregulation.", ">>{Rupperrt} : How often have you be to China or India? India is actually a nightmare of regulations and bureaucracy. China is steering everything, they give a lot of slack too but especially with environmental regulations they've really stepped on the pedal lately.", ">>{pizzashill} : I know the regulations exist, but they're hard to enforce in a lot of places. http://www.latitudenews.com/story/chinas-development-factories-injury-epidemic/ illegal factories, for example.", ">>{AlayneKr} : Cool your jets there partner. I'm sure some down votes are because of that, but if you read some comments, they are all confused as to what exactly this article is talking about. It's not really specific at all.", '>>{NotFooledbyFools} : It means that coal plants had to pay for their messes instead of just dumping them.', '>>{Publius_Jr} : It seems that they are pulling the estimates from the Federal Register\'s documents on the estimated costs of the individual programs. I\'ve only looked at a couple of them so far but here\'s an example.... **From the study, claims $191.2M cost for Conservation Reserve Program.** http://regrodeo.com/?year%5B0%5D=2009&regulation=Conservation%20Reserve%20Program--2009--191200000 **Relevant section of the federal register:** >"Based on estimates concerning the amount of land that will be eligible, assumed participation rates and annual enrollment, and estimated per-acre costs, the costs of implementing the changes considered in the interim rule are estimated to total $79.6 million through FY 2012 and **$191.2 million through FY 2018.** This averages to $19.1 million per year over 10 years. The estimated costs of the changes made by the 2008 Farm Bill and implemented in this rule are provided in table 2:" https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2009/06/29/E9-15305/conservation-reserve-program The question, of course, is not whether or not regulations cost money because we know they do. The question is whether or not the cost is justified. It\'s easy to just say "Big scary number! Be angry!" but people need to stop to actually see what the benefits are of those actions. I\'m open to taking in more information, but I largely agreed with the steps the Obama administration took. EDIT: Also, they\'re not using the annualized numbers in the headline, which would make more sense and, obviously, would be much smaller.', ">>{Rupperrt} : Yeah, you're right, I guess working regulations haven't really been a focus yet. I was more thinking of environmental ones to be honest. (because those are the ones threatened in the US) However, people get away with fewer and fewer over there. It's crazy how fast things happened.", '>>{pizzashill} : They have been making great progress. Especially in the "fake food" industry. The environmental regulations and health care regulations aren\'t things China has a choice in though. They have a massive population and pollution/healthcare problems hit them crazy hard. They\'re highly motivated.', '>>{Rupperrt} : Yep, and pressured from the in China new phenomena of middle class nimby-ism. Not everyone wants a coal power plant in their garden. There are over 5000 demonstrations a year most of them against building projects and pollution.', '>>{LittleShrub} : In other words ... a small price to pay.', '>>{PM_ME_DEAD_FASCISTS} : The fake food thing is so crazy to me. The bootleg cooking oil and stuff, ugh fucking disgusting. Shows what people will do without regulation.', '>>{nerdmann13} : CRP is also a totally voluntary program for enrollment, predates Obama by quite a bit and is funded through the Farm Bill so if that is included I would heavily question anything else as CRP is not even a regulation. Source: I enroll people in CRP.', '>>{Mallardy} : > The question, of course, is not whether or not regulations cost money because we know they do. The question is whether or not the cost is justified. It\'s easy to just say "Big scary number! Be angry!" but people need to stop to actually see what the benefits are of those actions. It\'s incredibly dishonest to refer to the "costs" of regulation without considering the *opportunity costs* of *not* having those regulations.', '>>{mrs_bungle} : Economically illiterate think tank making up numbers because their corporate donors want them too. Why is this seen as remotely credible ?', ">>{thx1138jr} : Thanks for this explanation. I couldn't figure out what the point of the story was.", ">>{berrieh} : They're actually being enforced more and more in China, though. If you compare the China of the early 2000s with where they are now, regulation enforcement is a very different beast.", ">>{science_abroad} : They've also stepped up on foreign business visas. I'm not saying it's relevant or good, but when they decide to do something, they do really do it.", ">>{A_Crabby_Patty} : Complying with regulations costs money. You have to hire employees and consultants to deal with the regulation, implement new systems. Shit's expensive.", '>>{jurrasicUser} : Solve overpopulation and increase profits at the same time.', ">>{A_Crabby_Patty} : Whenever you make new rules, it's going to take time and effort to follow them. I can't think of one example of a new regulation that took now time, money or effort to comply with.", '>>{JLord} : You could, for example, make a new regulation that forbids tax audits from taking place on corporations. Nobody would have to spend any money complying with it.', '>>{team_satan} : >The question, of course, is not whether or not regulations cost money because we know they do. The question is whether or not the cost is justified. It\'s easy to just say "Big scary number! Be angry!" but people need to stop to actually see what the benefits are of those actions. If you link through to the source study then you see that there is about $450B benefit per year from the regulations. It remains unclear to me what period of time the cost is assessed over.'], [">>{johnmountain} : Tech firms' encryption foe struggles for U.S. Senate re-election - Senator Richard Burr from North Carolina, the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, is facing a strong and unexpected challenge from Democrat Deborah Ross.", '>>{AlphaCygni} : We need all the help we can get here in NC. Burr has a lot of money and recognition. That Ross has gotten this close is amazing.', ">>{chefr89} : I wouldn't say 'amazing' given the fact Trump has turned the top of the GOP ticket into a shit show, not to mention the 2014 Senate race involved Democrat Kay Hagan losing her re-election bid miraculously. NC has had an interesting history of electing Democrats and Republicans to top-level offices fairly regularly. Up until McCrory got elected, we had a Dem in the guv's mansion for 16 years I think.", ">>{Davidfreeze} : When it comes to being against encryption it's been bipartisan. But not universal. Plenty of people on both sides stand for encryption.", ">>{DarkMaturus} : Let's turn this country Blue! Here is the Democratic challenger Deborah Ross' Twitter handle. Let's help her out! @DeborahRossNC. She could end up being an amazing ally for Bernie and Hillary in the Senate.", ">>{LeftousCrusader} : There are three interest groups advocating to destroy encryption. The first is well-known: spies. The second is also well-known, but trying to be very quiet: cops. The third is not mentioned often: the copyright industry. Everyone else, from private citizens to big banks, needs stronger information security. The spies are making hay with our current technology. They can see **everything**, but it does them no good because of the Base Rate Fallacy: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/07/terrorists_data.html The cops are also making hay. They cannot use mass surveillance to prevent crime for the same reason that spies can't use it to prevent terrorism, but they can use it to discover evidence once a crime has been committed. Hopefully someone in that camp will come to understand that bad encryption creates crime because it presents an opportunity to criminals. The copyright industry is doomed. Their business model demands that making a copy of intellectual property implies giving them money, but the entire purpose of information technology is to make copying information free and easy. TPP furthers their desperate effort to make the public bear the cost of propping up their irrational business model by paying for police, prosecutors, judges and prisons. We'll win the encryption war in the end, but the end will come much sooner if we get rid of the legislators who dance to the tune of spies, cops, and copyright lawyers.", ">>{baljeettjinder} : Some people on both sides however are definitely pro-privacy. Rand Paul is a republican and is the total opposite of this dude. Meanwhile it seems that burr's democratic challenger is also very pro-privacy", ">>{stormcrowsx} : Voting just to turn the country blue isn't a wise idea. For instance, from the privacy perspective I'd prefer Kentucky stay red with Rand Paul. Vote on the issues that matter to you not on the color of the candidate. Hell Hillary is fairly anti-privacy on encryption, I wouldn't want a senate that is an ally to her on that issue. On this particular case though it does seem like Ross > Burr. But that's not everywhere.", ">>{Words_are_Windy} : This is good news, but I'm guessing it's more backlash against the North Carolina legislature's constant attempts to disenfranchise minority voters more than an issue over encryption.", ">>{Sarunae_} : >That Ross has gotten this close is amazing. Eh, it's not that surprising considering how badly the NCGOP has been doing this year. Between the Trumptanic, the HB2 disaster, and the entire voter ID clusterfuck that's been going around NC, it's been basically serving all as a call-to-arms for Independents and Democrats to go out and vote the state blue.", '>>{LeftousCrusader} : Hopefully Hillary can at least recognize that **she** needs strong encryption. She\'s an elitist, though, so she\'ll probably lean towards the "magical intention detector" based version of encryption (back doors) rather than coming to grips with the fact that **everyone** needs strong encryption.', '>>{cjluthy} : Sounds to me like the voting machines in NC have a date with The Equation Group.', ">>{stormcrowsx} : I believe she currently wants encryption but then she also wants a back door for FBI etc. I don't think she fully understands that once that back door is found, anyone can walk through it. Or as is the case with many politicians, she is not qualified enough to make decisions about encryption.", ">>{rileyrulesu} : Mine either! Primarily because I live in Florida, but it's the thought that counts, right?", '>>{iiig} : Based on the fact that Russian state-sponsored hackers successfully compromised their security? In that case, neither is the NSA.', ">>{drsjsmith} : /r/UnexpectedHamilton >But when all is said and all is done >Jefferson has beliefs. Burr has none Or, from the source document: >Mr. Burr loves nothing but himself-Thinks of nothing but his own aggrandizement--and will be content with nothing short of permanent power in his own hands.--No compact, that he should make with any passion in his breast except Ambition, could be relied upon by himself. Senator Richard Burr's [great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandfather was Benjamin Burr.](http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~battle/senators/burr.htm) Benjamin Burr's [brother was Jehue Burr Sr.; Jehue Burr Sr.'s son was immigrant Jehu Burr.](http://www.burrcook.com/history/burr.html) Vice President Aaron Burr's [great-grandfather was the same immigrant Jehu Burr.](http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~dav4is/ODTs/BURR.shtml#BURR100) That makes Senator Richard Burr the fourth cousin, seven times removed of Vice President Aaron Burr.", ">>{churikadeva} : Man the day Burr gets out of the Senate I will be a happy man... Even though Kay Hagen was a Democrat I'm glad she's gone as well...she was pushing for all those net neutrality killing bills.", ">>{LeftousCrusader} : Perhaps someone could make it plain to her with the aid of these cartoons that I found on Bruce Schneier's web site: * http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?id=4083 * https://www.truthdig.com/cartoon/item/digital_back_door_20160307 * https://twitter.com/danielsolove/status/701729120812597248 (the post: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2016/04/encryption_back_1.html)", '>>{Jwalla83} : > That makes Senator Richard Burr the fourth cousin, seven times removed of Vice President Aaron Burr. Aha! Political dynasty! Nepotism! Corruption!', ">>{janiceNaccounting} : Yeah, there are Democrats on the ballot in November who don't just have bad stances when it comes to these issues, but some clearly have a poor understanding of them. Vote for candidates who share your views (left or right), and if neither candidate does try to vote for people who are willing to at least educate themselves on matters that are important to you.", ">>{LeftousCrusader} : > That makes Senator Richard Burr the fourth cousin, seven times removed of Vice President Aaron Burr. I've never understood the southern calculus of cousining. ELI5?", '>>{drsjsmith} : John Burr (b. 1726) and Vice President Aaron Burr had the same great-great-great-grandfather. Having the same grandfather makes you first cousins; having the same great-grandfather makes you second cousins; having the same great-great-grandfather makes you third cousins; having the same great-great-great-great grandfather makes you fourth cousins. John Burr (b. 1726) was Senator Richard Burr\'s great-great-great-great-great-grandfather, that is, seven generations back. The seven generations are where we get "seven times removed". Whether the shared male ancestor also includes the same wife of that shared male ancestor appears to be unknown, so these could all be half-fourth cousins or full fourth cousins.', '>>{LeftousCrusader} : Thank you for making the effort to explain that to me.', ">>{contemptorary} : I sent her a few bucks. Even if she weren't on the same side of an issue I care about, I like to see some turnover in the Senate. It's not meant to be a defacto lifetime appointment, made on the basis of name recognition.", ">>{F22Rapture} : The copyright industry kinda relies on encryption... It's the basis for DRM.", ">>{LeftousCrusader} : DRM is a failed effort to put the math on their side. It could only succeed if they get to decide what runs on our computers, and that means making the Trusted Computing Initiative into an enforceable law. The criminal sanctions for file sharing in the TPP are their last shot. If TPP goes down, they will continue trying to get those sanctions written into US law by hook or by crook. Enforcing that law will be hideously expensive because detecting an infraction will be hideously difficult unless encryption is outlawed. So that's what to expect from the copyright industry: simultaneous advocacy for the Trusted Computing Initiative and weaker encryption.", '>>{CylonbabyLiam} : Over almost anyone else in congress, these anti-internet privacy bastards have got to get ousted, if we want to set good tech precedents for tomorrow.', ">>{MagaMagaChooChoo} : Burr is small potatoes. We should really be going after Dianne Feinstein D-CA. She's the one behind the big push to outlaw encryption. I have called to voice my displeasure several times this year. A Republican will never be able to unseat her in California, so it's up to you Liberals to primary her out and clean up your trash. We can all agree that this is a bipartisan issue, right?", '>>{CylonbabyLiam} : Let\'s turn this country the color of representative that won\'t vote against privacy. Dianne Feinstein has been trying to beat down internet privacy protections for years, in the name of her copyright industry and telecom industry backers. She was one of the leading forces behind SOPA and PIPA. She wanted to see Snowden brought to "justice" in the United States, for his exposure of the NSA. She is an enemy of technological liberty, and outspoken about her preferences, but this receives *very* little coverage because of her party affiliation. The majority of Clinton\'s views on privacy mimic hers. People like this in either party need to be stopped.', ">>{asher1611} : Deborah Ross is legit. Don't get me wrong, Richard Burr is bad, but he's not Jesse Helms, Sue Myrick, or Virginia Foxx level horrible. But he has fallen lockstep into the tea party line (which anyone who thought about it for 5 seconds could have predicted). He doesn't represent NC's interests. I'd be happy enough to vote him out as is. But Ross actually has a good platform of her own. It's nice in this election to actually be voting for somebody somewhere on the ticket.", ">>{asher1611} : Agreed. I'm tired of so many tech illiterate NC legislators who end up in positions that control law and policy on tech. Mel Watt is another horrifying example.", '>>{TheRighteousTyrant} : >The copyright industry is doomed. Their business model demands that making a copy of intellectual property implies giving them money, but the entire purpose of information technology is to make copying information free and easy. What about the cost of *producing* that information? This conundrum is why journalism sucks so badly these days, no one but advertisers want to pay these groups for actually creating content.', ">>{LeftousCrusader} : We do not need them. What information technology has done to the cost of manufacturing physical goods it has done even harder to the cost of creating intellectual property. As things stand, US IP law is the establishment's last line of defense against the intelligence and creativity of the crowd.", '>>{dskatz2} : Well, probably that and the LBGT bathroom bill, and general downballot losses from Trump.', '>>{tigerscomeatnight} : What you are saying is correct. The media (music, video and to some extent books) industry used to be a distribution model business. With the advent of the internet and digitization it has become merely a copying industry. I heard a story one time that helped understand this. Back before things could be copied exactly (before Xerox® brand copying machines, before Gutenburg?) if somebody made something, say an arrow for their bow, it couldn\'t be stolen. If they shot it, anyone who saw it would say "there\'s Running Bear\'s arrow". If you tried to steal it people would just say "why do you have Running Bear\'s arrow?". There could be no theft within the village (maybe food but not objects) because everything was individualized, nothing was an exact copy of anything, everything was hand made (or made individualized by nature) and there was nothing "generic". There\'s probably some philosophical argument that can be made with regards to genericization and society and "Plato\'s cave" or "das Ding an sich", but I\'ll leave that for now. Edit: [This](http://qz.com/767812/millennial-whoop/) is probably the result of genericization.', ">>{rootkeycompromise} : For the sake of, and right to, privacy everywhere: Go vote! His voter segment surely will do and it's so nice to see so many incumbents getting challenged on the meaningless claims they have repeated for years.", '>>{330mod87} : I wonder how many of these congress people will complain when their credit cards and social security numbers keep getting stolen from weakened encryption?', '>>{Calamity_Jesus} : Yeah, people are starting to confuse us (Best Carolina) with Worst Carolina. Last week I had to correct someone on reddit that made a (upvoted) claim that NC was the first state to seceed (hint: we were one of the last).', ">>{TheRighteousTyrant} : So when my friend's band is trying to sell records, they shouldn't be getting paid for their time and effort making that music? Where do you draw the line?", '>>{estrangedeskimo} : We *were* however the first to declare independence from Britain.', ">>{Areonis} : Feinstein is 83. I'd bet on her retiring when her term is up at the end of 2018, so the important part for Californians will be to elect a new Senator who is against the anti-encryption movement.", ">>{fudsaf} : Totally. NC is such a promising state with some exceptional people, huge commerce, and dedicated progressives. We're completely wingclipped by awful politicians like McCrory and Burr. Seriously hoping for a sea change this November. As a Charlotte resident, I'm very hopeful about our future!", '>>{330mod87} : This article puts that into perspective. [Hillary Clinton wants “Manhattan-like project” to break encryption](http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/12/hillary-clinton-wants-manhattan-like-project-to-break-encryption/) No politician should make any decisions about technology without consulting with professionals/scholars first.', ">>{Self_Manifesto} : I'm just as proud as the next North Carolinian, but the evidence for the Mecklenburg Resolves is really thin.", ">>{LeftousCrusader} : It's stupid for an individual band to try selling records. Tell your friend to sell performances and crowd fund whatever recordings he/she/nonbinary needs to promote those performances.", ">>{Fellidae} : People will still pay creators for work, even when they don't have to. (No source don't quote me and call bullshit if you like) I believe that some research had shown that even though people are pirating more music, that even as piracy goes up, so do profits, because people finding new music still contribute money to bands or music that they like. I don't remember any specific study but it seems to be in like with my experience. If I have money to give, I'll buy afford out a digital album from artists I like.", ">>{TheRighteousTyrant} : They do all that too; that isn't the point of the question, it's dodging the question. What about privately-funded works of research? If I spend a year researching and writing a book, should I not be entitled to sell the result of that work? Edit: funny how y'all are downvoting but not addressing this second paragraph.", '>>{nicfic} : Came here to make sure there were the necessary Hamilton references... Thanks for meeting my expectations. Something about shots and rooms where it happens, etc.', '>>{TheRighteousTyrant} : Same, but I\'d qualify that first sentence with "some people" because obviously not everyone will, freeloaders are a thing.', '>>{lout_zoo} : Can we please get rid of them both? She is the epitome of everything that is wrong with the Democratic Party. Besides Hillary.', '>>{lout_zoo} : That only solves half the problem. Democrats like Hillary, Diane Feinstein and Nancy Pelosi are the other half working for the plutocracy and against freedom.', ">>{lout_zoo} : Let's do our best to make sure every cent Art Pope spends is wasted. Of course then we'll have the herculian task of getting the Democrats to actually support the people.", ">>{PooOnYoureFoot} : The legislature of NC is trying to fuck everyone in the state... not just minority voters. It's literally the entire state pushing back against them to some degree.", ">>{PlanetStarbux} : Elections like this are why everyone should register and vote. Yes, you should vote for president...but it's the races like this that make a real difference. Your vote is much more important as you go down the ballot. Senators and Reps are the ones actually making laws...it's important on the Federal level, and an order of magnitude more important to you on the state, county, and city level.", '>>{Trimblco} : > Voting just to turn the country blue isn\'t a wise idea. For instance, from the privacy perspective I\'d prefer Kentucky stay red with Rand Paul. Single-issue voting isn\'t a wise idea, imo. You may get some good ideas on privacy from Rand Paul, but you also get him voting for Mitch McConnell as majority leader, who sets the agenda in the senate and opposes Paul on those issues and makes sure they rarely come up for a vote. You also get him voting for conservative supreme court justices who rule in favor of the government in 4th amendment cases. You also get anti-gay bigotry, increase in income inequality through a conservative tax cuts for the rich, support for voter ID laws, desire to abolish the department of education, and vocal support of citizens united. > I do however agree with Citizens United, in that I think speech, whether you pay for it or not, is speech. That\'s only the tip of the iceberg with Rand Paul. Outside of the 4th amendment, he\'s just a standard tea party republican. I say this as a public defender, and the 4th amendment and criminal justice reform in general is by far my most important issue when selecting a candidate. But I could never support Rand Paul. I\'d take his opponent Jim Gray any day of the week--and Gray voting for a progressive justice on the court would go much further than any speech Rand Paul has given on the issue. That\'s why "turning the country blue" is important this election, especially on issues that play out in the courts. We need a progressive senate to gain a progressive supreme court.', ">>{jmcgit} : A popular band can self-produce and they'll be fine because they're already popular. Do you know what the record industry did? They would discover young, new artists with potential, finance their career, promote them, and set up their tour. In exchange, they get a significant amount of the revenue. Today? Bands never get that label support, so they never have enough money to market themselves to a mainstream audience. It takes ten years to build a decent following as a band these days. The Beatles' entire career was ten years, but if they started playing music today, nobody would have heard of them, having broken up before anybody noticed. Seriously, who is your favorite musician younger than 27 years old? You might be able to find a marketable young pop singer in that range, but if you're not into pop or rap you may not even be able to think of someone. Jimi Hendrix was dead, his career complete, at that age.", ">>{stormcrowsx} : I don't follow local Kentucky politics closely but I based my opinion on him under the assumption that like most of the Southeastern region the politicians who support the baptist views are far more likely to get elected. If we gotta have someone religious, Rand Paul, is not too bad.", ">>{Fellidae} : I don't know the age of the heads of most music I listen to. You seem to make the pretty large assumption that pop music is the only music to exist, and indie record labels don't exist. I listen to a lot of music that probably won't get mainstream attention (hipster what the fuck ever, I'm just being honest) even if they were to get a big record label. Instrumental music? I don't know of any station near me that isn't classical music that plays solely instrumental music. I think that with the internet being able to get smaller bands out there, big record labels aren't so important to finding a fan base. Sure, the Beatles needed a record label, because accessing people was more difficult. We have the internet now. Sending someone some music I found I'd absurdly easy and musicians can hit it big with Just a YouTube channel. FUCK, HAS EVERYONE ALREADY FORGOTTEN HOW JUSTIN BIEBER MADE IT BIG?", '>>{LeftousCrusader} : There is currently no viable market for renting copies of digital IP to individual consumers and no such market will arise. The business plan that evolved around that market died when everyone became a publisher by buying mass information copying devices. What our IP law does now is prevent small operators from reaching large audiences.', '>>{Trimblco} : Oh sure, vote for him in the GOP primary. But against an actual progressive in the general election, why not vote for the progressive?', ">>{let_them_eat_slogans} : > They do all that too Then that's how they get paid for their time and effort. What's the problem?", '>>{TheRighteousTyrant} : That that\'s not really a sustainable model, neither for them nor for others who live by intellectual creations, like authors, who cannot "perform" a book.', ">>{MagaMagaChooChoo} : Oh yeah for sure. I'm just making sure the liberals on this sub understand that it won't stop with Burr. The ringmaster is a Democrat so they otherwise wouldn't hear it from the corporatist liberal media.", ">>{TheRighteousTyrant} : I never said anything about renting. What are you on about? Blockbuster is dead, I get that and I'm not trying to resurrect it nor its business model.", ">>{MagaMagaChooChoo} : Establishment Democrats generally groom their replacements, the next one after Feinstein will continue her efforts unless there is regime change through primary or a Republican replaces her (even that's not a guarantee). A primary loss for Feinstein with this as a central issue is the only way.", ">>{let_them_eat_slogans} : > That that's not really a sustainable model In what sense? I see plenty of artists following this model successfully. For authors, there are book readings and signings and the like to serve as an analogue, and crowd funding is there for them too. But partly, we have to recognize that technology has vastly lowered the barriers to entry in these fields. Every creator has free worldwide distribution at their fingertips, musicians no longer need to rent an expensive studio to record, writers no longer need to pay a factory to print copies of their books, and hence the fields have become vastly more competitive. It is no longer realistic, if it ever was, to expect to make a profitable or self-sustaining living simply by writing or making music. The demand simply can't come close to keeping up with the gluttonous supply.", '>>{LtSqueak} : If the copyright industry wants weaker encryption, they need to start by putting their money where there mouth is. Fair use laws say that I should be able to back up my movies for my own personal use, but in order to do so currently, I would have to crack the DRM, which is currently against the law due to being considered hacking. File sharing already has laws against it. Why the need for the continued use of DRM?', '>>{TheRighteousTyrant} : >> That that\'s not really a sustainable model >In what sense? I see plenty of artists following this model successfully. To the point that they are making a living just from that? Doubtful. And why shouldn\'t they be able to? >For authors, there are book readings and signings and the like to serve as an analogue Why should they have to do this rather than just be able to sell the product of their work? Can you answer that? > musicians no longer need to rent an expensive studio to record Oh lord, you don\'t know what you\'re talking about. Sure, you can do a pretty good job at home playing guitar into your computer but there\'s no replacement for a good studio and properly miced gear, especially when it comes to drums and vocals. > The demand simply can\'t come close to keeping up with the gluttonous supply. The fact that people continue to pirate music despite a "gluttonous supply" of free stuff kinda suggests otherwise. Most of what\'s out there for free is garbage. Put another way, there may be a glut of recordings (and writings and drawings and paintings and whatever), but not one of real talent.', ">>{jmcgit} : Under no circumstances am I saying that pop music is the only music to exist. I'm saying that for everything that isn't pop music, anything different, there's no support system for it anymore. Your last paragraph, with the internet being able to get small bands out there, I touched on that in my last post. It works, but the problem is that it takes a really long time for a band to develop even a moderately successful following that way. It doesn't help that most of the music that's spread on the internet is consumed on the internet. There's no money in recording, all the money is on touring. Only problem is, in order to tour, you need money, and you need to be popular enough to be comfortable that you'll recoup your investment. Record labels didn't only provide significant help top 40 acts like the way it is today. That's a post-Napster phenomena.", ">>{Calamity_Jesus} : Well, our colonists were the first to nope out of the UK's big brother surveillance program. #Croatoan #NeverForget", ">>{ImVeryOffended} : ...and yet we're about to elect one of two other foes of encryption president, and companies like Google and Facebook are putting their full support behind one of them.", ">>{RheagarTargaryen} : I don't mind Rand Paul. He reasonable on many issue and is pretty anti war. He isn't afraid to vote against party lines. He also takes the time to read bills before voting on them. If the dems are contesting seats, his seat shouldn't be too priority.", '>>{let_them_eat_slogans} : > To the point that they are making a living just from that? Doubtful. And why shouldn\'t they be able to? As outlined previously, because of supply and demand. When there are thousand people providing the exact same service as you and willing to lose money to do it, then it doesn\'t make sense to expect to be able to make a living from it. > Why should they have to do this rather than just be able to sell the product of their work? Can you answer that? Because thanks to advancements in technology, the product of their work is infinitely available at zero cost. It has no real value in economic terms, so it\'s not reasonable to expect to be able to profit from it. It\'s like trying to sell air. > Oh lord, you don\'t know what you\'re talking about. Sure, you can do a pretty good job at home playing guitar into your computer but there\'s no replacement for a good studio and properly miced gear, especially when it comes to drums and vocals. Having been through this process enough times myself, I\'d like to think that I have some idea of what I\'m talking about. Sure, expensive studio and staff can help, but when it comes down to the final product we\'re at the point where the listener can no longer tell the difference between an expensive studio project and an album recorded in someone\'s living room. > The fact that people continue to pirate music despite a "gluttonous supply" of free stuff kinda suggests otherwise. Most of what\'s out there for free is garbage. You can listen to practically anything for free on Youtube. And I don\'t think it\'s useful for you to bring your own subjective musical tastes into the discussion. You might think an artist is garbage, another person might think they are fantastic.', ">>{TheRighteousTyrant} : My bad on the wrong assumption there. Good points, can't really argue with most of that. Except: >And I don't think it's useful for you to bring your own subjective musical tastes into the discussion. You might think an artist is garbage, another person might think they are fantastic. I'm really not, because I obviously haven't listened to everything out there. Most people just aren't going to be good musicians (or writers or whatever) and with previous entry barriers that helped separate the wheat from the chaff now gone, there's going to be a bigger percentage of crap out there than before.", '>>{LeftousCrusader} : Everyone whose business model involves licensing IP to consumers is doomed.', ">>{TheRighteousTyrant} : Well here's hoping that quality doesn't suffer as a result.", ">>{let_them_eat_slogans} : That's not something that I can argue against, because it's based on your own subjective idea of what is good and what is crap.", '>>{TheRighteousTyrant} : I think many of us have been doing our best to forget Justin Bieber, period.', ">>{rendeld} : people just want stuff for free, they want to be able to pirate it. they don't intend on paying the content creators because they feel entitled to all content.", ">>{TheRighteousTyrant} : Let me put it another way. Most acts out there aren't going to get popular and make it big. That's not me making a subjective judgment about quality, that's a result of everyone that is exposed to them doing so.", ">>{rendeld} : flume... but the electronic music industry works very differently from the normal record industry. the EDM world has embraced a new direction that emphasis live performances and uses the Internet to distribute free content while also keeping some of their content paid for (on Spotify, and other mediums that pay them). I don't know if it will work for all industries but the artists owning the labels and then promoting their artists alongside themselves has been working wonders for labels like Mad Decent, Owsla, and Spinnin'.", ">>{Codeshark} : It is on the state flag, and those can't lie.", ">>{cryopyre} : The industry is undergoing a cultural transformation. You may as well ask how one can have composers without nobles to patron them. People will always produce art, and to consider the form of compensation in place today necessary or ideal to stimulate that is silly. In many ways art has suffered and worsened under the mass media/IP system. Furthermore, there are creators who put immense amount of time into their work and can live off of donations. One's whose name was built off of their work. Toady, for example.", '>>{therealstupid} : As a native (and older) Californian, I thought it was a great thing when Feinstein was elected senator in 1992. And then when Barbra Boxer came in the very next year, I was proud to be in one of the first states (if not THE first) to have not one, but two, female senators serving at the same time. Well, it\'s been 24 years now. Those "progressive" 1992 views have been left by the wayside. I have to tip my hat to Ms. Boxer for stepping down after many years of service. Problem is that Feinstein is making far too much money from her position to ever consider doing the Right Thing and will milk the position for all its worth. She runs unopposed because if a challenger were to appear, her machine just offers them a bucket of money (and some sort of ridiculously overpaid job that requires almost no effort at all) and they quietly disappear into the shadows. There\'s no way to get her out short of electing a Republican and that\'s about as likely as California seceding. We\'re pretty much stuck with her until she dies, most likely. Having said that, she is 83. I expect only one or two more terms from her.', '>>{Codeshark} : A Republican replacing a Senator from California does not seem likely.', '>>{Codeshark} : I think Kay Hagan probably lost because she seemed really weak. Her commercial was basically "I have a D next to my name but I am not really a democrat" from my impression. I could be wrong, but "I am lukewarm" doesn\'t fire up the base.', '>>{MagaMagaChooChoo} : Yes, I agree. I say as much in my original comment.', ">>{chefr89} : It just ended up not being a great year for Dems, so I think national trends held true for NC as well. I was out of the country though with very limited access to the outside world, so I can't say I know the race's finer details too well", ">>{Codeshark} : Yeah, I was a little more politically involved, then. Her campaign seemed disorganized. That's sort of started to diminish.", ">>{Pabst_Blue_Gibbon} : CA is a jungle primary. The most progressive D will win the primary and the race, which is what happened/will happen this year. (Not that she's super liberal, but more liberal out of the 2 establishment Dems on the primary ballot.)", '>>{jacobolus} : Feinstein’s 1992 and 1994 campaigns were all about keeping Mexican immigrants out of California (after she got beat by Wilson in 1990 with his anti-immigrant campaign), with a nice assist from Bill Clinton (shame on him too). She was also “tough on crime” (pro death penalty, pro police, anti drug, etc.), and pro military. And a big promoter of CA agriculture in their fights against environmentalists. Pro business more generally. She was never especially “progressive”. I’d call her a mainstream centrist/corporate Democrat with authoritarian tendencies.', ">>{TitaniumDragon} : This view is advocated by no intelligent or creative people. Sad but true. The reality is that IP costs a lot of money to produce. Copyrights, patents, and trademarks all exist precisely *because* information is so easy to copy relative to products. The idea that information technology changes anything about this is completely wrong; it changes nothing. Books have always been easy to copy; they're even easier today. The reason copyrights exist is because it is so easy to copy intellectual property relative to the cost of creating it. The thing that pirates fear the most is the loss of anonymity on the Internet. Once that happens, it becomes very easy to find anyone who is violating the law and fine them or put them in jail. The reality is that this is what pirates really fear - the loss of online anonymity, because once they lose that, they lose their ability to break the law freely. The thing is, encryption and anonymity have nothing to do with each other; it is possible to encrypt information, and hide its content from everyone, while still exposing its origin and end points. In fact, all good cryptographic systems can be intercepted endlessly and reveal nothing about the contents of the package. Once pirates lose their anonymity, they're screwed. It doesn't matter what encryption they have.", ">>{katrina_pierson} : I'd pin it down to her lucking out and getting elected during a presidential election year (especially with that disastrous Dole atheist ad). Her reelection being as close as it was in 2014 during a heavily GOP year is a feat in itself."]]

classify and reply

['>>{MrBeachBum51} : We should be able to customize the Control Center a little.', ">>{newfonehudis} : It is a bit baffling as to why there is absolutely no customisation for CC other than toggling lock screen and in-app access. I never use airplay or airdrop, and whilst I do use nightshift, I don't really need a toggle because I've set it to auto.", '>>{crisss1205} : Most carriers do not do contracts anymore. DPP may be cheaper too.', ">>{Stuffonastick} : The actual cost of the phone starts at $649. Contract (subsidy) pricing is more or less gone. Carriers would much rather you jump on the new pay x for this many months plans which are now extremely prevalent. You can (try) to call up Verizon and see if they'll do a contract plan for you, but don't cross your fingers.", '>>{EliteMerkel} : Poll: Hillary Clinton Solidifies Big Lead On Donald Trump - NBC News', ">>{ilovemyblueshirt} : I don't see the TV app either after upgrading to 10.2 (iPhone 7 Plus)", '>>{skee323} : You can definitely order it for $199 through Verizon, I renewed my Contract for 2 years and paid $299 for a jet black 128gb 7. Straight through Apples site. I LOVE Verizon.', ">>{McInnis7} : Maybe US only? I did notice something very weird when upgrading from beta 1, the phone must have crashed during instal cause I went back to software update and it showed beta 2 was still available when I had thought it went through the installation process. So check for the software update again to make sure you're on beta 2.", ">>{BrownsFanZ} : Ok that I can try, I am in the US so I don't think thats the cause.", ">>{MrBeachBum51} : Right? That's actually one of the reasons I switched over to android a few years back. I like a lot of customization options in my phones. I'm pretty sure I've never touched the do not disturb toggle button on purpose. So, I don't need it to be there at all.", '>>{newaptthrowaway} : have heard some carriers can sign you up for a traditional 2 year contract when done over the phone or in store. the downside is that some carriers may have surcharges on their plans in lieu of having a contract. mine actually discounts me for having an installment agreement, which brings it to the cost of a normal rate plan plus contract lol', '>>{NuclearShadow} : Not every horse can win the race. The result of this election was obvious to begin with. Much like the 2008 election the president was truly decided by the Democratic primary rather than the general election. When the Republicans present a candidate that simply can\'t win there isn\'t anything to get excited about. This time around with Trump we see Hillary making rather large errors and still she\'s pulling ahead. This isn\'t a praise to Hillary it simply shows how backwards the Republican party has become it\'s becoming unrelatable to anyone but the most extreme. If anyone dissagrees with me on this than let me just point out the internet trolls who massive "support" (through they don\'t really and won\'t be voting for him) Trump. Trolls take the most extreme and objectionable stances to get a rise out of others when you have online trolls on your side you know you\'re views are not rational nor mainstream. On election day I plan on having a nice cup of tea and I am not going to watch the news because spoiler alert, Hillary wins. Instead I am going to watch r/the_donald when the majority of them reveal themselves as trolls and turn on the minority that actually supported Trump.', ">>{taboo007} : Yeah that's one of the big things I miss from Android is to customize the quick settings/CC buttons. I imagine they will try to put the low power mode in this year, I doubt they will put in customization for it.", '>>{MrBeachBum51} : I loved all of the customization options when I had an android. Hopefully Apple will give us a little bit more in the future.', ">>{tormunds_beard} : I'm in the US and don't have it on the dev beta 2.", '>>{gdbjr} : I use DND daily. Every time I go into a meeting I enable DND. I have never used low power mode. I am pretty sure Apple is tracking all of this and knows what most people use more. But I do agree about night shift. It is scheduled and I never touch it outside of that schedule.', '>>{Profaniter} : Yes!!! Also auto-brightness too! I want that too. And for the vibrate and sound toggle too!', ">>{swanny246} : I get the feeling Apple thought users would want to toggle Night Shift more than we actually do - for example if doing something that crucially relies on colour. I'd take a Low Power Mode toggle over a Night Shift toggle, or hey, both.", ">>{liquid5170} : Tv app replaced the video app however I have both now. Just make sure you didn't have the video app deleted or I heard it's a pain to get the TV app back.", ">>{BrownsFanZ} : No, it wasn't deleted, I just have the Videos app. Are you on a public beta?", ">>{cocobandicoot} : I would like to see this happen eventually, but until then, there's /r/jailbreak.", ">>{TeaP0tty} : Apple Upgrade Program is the cheapest if you don't have a contract. No upfront purchase of the phone, and no extra $20/month for phone & $10/month insurance.", '>>{BrownsFanZ} : Yeah probably 3-4. Calendar and Reminders, maybe Stocks and Tips.', '>>{TeaP0tty} : Carrier contracts are a bad deal now. Apple upgrade program is significantly cheaper.', ">>{BelieveEnemie} : If only it were October and Hillary wasn't a horrible candidate with mountains of pending evidence for corruption that could come crashing down any day.", ">>{skee323} : Apple upgrade program costs almost double what Verizon's 2 year commitment price costs. I don't plan on leaving Verizon for years to come so it's a no brainer for me. (And to any one that can do the math)", '>>{tangibleadhd} : After November 8th, Hillary trolls will disappear. The silver lining of this joke of an election.', ">>{any_other} : Or at least put in long press actions on the buttons. Why can't I hold down the wifi toggle to go to wifi settings. Hey here's this awesome force touch feature we don't implement at all!", '>>{OfficialHoSay} : Are you in the US region? EDIT: NVM', '>>{lipsyncforyourlife} : Seriously? She avoided indictment, was called out by the FBI chief, and is still polling like this. That was far and away her biggest legal problem and its over.', ">>{TeaP0tty} : No it doesn't. You have been misinformed, or did the math wrong. Apple Upgrade Program is a 0% interest loan on same price as buying the phone from Apple directly for full price. Through carriers like Verizon you can purchase the phone for a subsidized price, sure. But that doesn't factor the extra $20/month for your phone vs no-contract plan. Then there is $9/month insurance, surely more expensive than Applecare through the upgrade program.", '>>{BelieveEnemie} : Too many months and debates left. Her health and legal problems will find a way out. Probably in October.', '>>{BatCountry9} : I imagine after election day, a lot of that sub will quickly move on to other pressing matters, like naming new Mountain Dew flavors.', ">>{skee323} : You don't own your phone with the Apple upgrade your program, you are leasing it and returning it every year for a newer one. In order to own it you need to make 24 payments. Which ends up costing you $700+, as opposed to $299 from Verizon. Also I don't pay $20 a month extra for a contract plan or $9 a month for insurance, if I need Apple care I can purchase it through Apple.", '>>{NuclearShadow} : If you\'re talking about correct the record, they aren\'t trolls. Trolls try to get a rise out of their targets. Correct the record simply operates in 2 ways that isn\'t trolling. 1. They rebuttal attacks on Hillary on the internet. Saying someone is wrong on the internet and giving the facts isn\'t trolling. In-fact I even like this idea with how common lies spread through social media this could be a effective measure to keep people honest and informed. I do believe however that Correct The Record should be obligated to reveal themselves. They should also only focus on credible sources and share such when giving a rebuttal. I highly doubt they are working this ethically however. 2. They work as a PR group by creating fake buzz for Hillary. This also isn\'t trolling it\'s simply making the appearance of more enthusiasm than what someone actually has. This method of doing it online while new the general practice itself isn\'t. The only group that does it more than politicians is the entertainment business. For example let\'s say a teenage musician that a record label put a lot of resources into is going on tour and the first stops tickets aren\'t selling very well they will give away tons of tickets so they can turn around and call it "sold out" which will make the musician appear more popular than they actually are and this hype can genuinely lead to more ticket sales for their next shows. Deceiving? Yes, trolling? No. *edit* Oddly my list is forcing both to be seen as "1" when I put 2 as the second.', '>>{Xeggreo} : You can force touch the settings app and get to the Wifi and bluetooth settings directly.', ">>{TeaP0tty} : Wrong again. Its a money loan, not a lease on the phone. You get to keep the phone at the end of 2 years. But if you choose the free upgrade after 1 year, you will have to trade in your phone. Carrier contract plans are ALWAYS more expensive than buying the phone in full, which is essentially what you are doing with Apple's upgrade program. With carrier contract, you are definitely paying extra per month, you are just not aware of it.", '>>{nd_annajones} : I don\'t have it either. Does anyone know the URL scheme for opening the app? Maybe we can force the "restore app" dialogue', ">>{Ximitar} : You think Donald Trump can make it that far without alienating everyone who isn't an undereducated white male, further Twitter meltdowns, bizarre claims and lies and without having his guts pulled out and wrapped around his neck in the debates? I don't.", '>>{skee323} : You are incorrect. I am not paying extra for it. I just went and reviewed my statements and I am not paying any extra fees. Yes, you get to keep your phone at the end of 2 years, but you end up paying more than double the price that I do.', '>>{TeaP0tty} : Its not in your statement as a separate charge. They roll it into line access fee to hide it. Line access fee outside of contract is $20/month, and you pay an additional $15-$20 with contract.', ">>{Sillyoldactivist} : I have the same problem. I deleted the TV by mistake and now I don't know how to get it back. It's not in the list of apps in the app store and neither in my updates/purrchased/not in this phone. When i try to buy a movie it tels me I need to download TV app - I say yes and then it says it's not available in the US app store", '>>{crisss1205} : What plan are you on? How much is your line fee?', ">>{barrelofsuperfish} : It feels like we've seen this thread a lot lately. At least they found someone that people are more afraid of then Hillery.", ">>{STOLEN_JEEP_STUFF} : But why does it have to be 3d touch? It's screwing people that don't have the 6s/7 when a long press works just as well.", '>>{druuconian} : But I have it on high authority that he is doing very well and that "the Hispanics" love him. Typical corrupt liberal media. Sad!', ">>{BleedingCatz} : Jesus Christ just fucking jailbreak. You won't get arrested by the Apple police, I promise.", ">>{InFearn0} : Trump's Trump U trial is scheduled *after* the election. It is unclear what will happen if by some slim chance he becomes the President Elect.", ">>{BrownsFanZ} : Sadly I don't think you will be able to get it back till the next beta or the official launch.", ">>{InFearn0} : Correct The Record is the obvious response to the [Earp Phenomena](https://twitter.com/briandavidearp/status/481304548305555456) (named for Brian D. Earp's hilarious slide show, not because he engages in bullshit). The choices are: 1. Let bullshit stand and taint fact with its stench. 2. Spend the money/effort to combat it.", '>>{SquanchingOnPao} : [I will have my popcorn ready at the debates, if she will show up](https://twitter.com/_AltRight_Anew/status/762718618249367552)', '>>{Ren-Ren-Ren} : Absolutely this! All those toggles should have force touch', '>>{NuclearShadow} : You do realize if she actually was in ill health and it got to the point where she had to drop out this would only further the crushing of Trump right? Hillary is a unpopular candidate putting someone else in her place will simply make the lead greater.', '>>{mo2fdwxd} : This is one of the first thing i love from jailbreak, i just 3D touch the wifi sign to show my favorite website, abd btw you can add anything to it-from actionning lte to reboot, its awesome.', ">>{samturner321} : I have iPhone 7 plus, and I heard you can't jailbreak it :( ?", '>>{Clivelethbridge} : You can jailbreak it technically with Mach-portal, however it\'s a little bit "hacky" currently . Once 10.3 is realised you "may" see a more complete jailbreak. There\'s flipcontrolcentre to customise control centre toggles , or ccsettings IF it gets updated to support iOS 10. Hope that helps', '>>{Hey0PiggyStyle} : 10.1 and 10.1.1 is jailbreakable. A little unstable but works great. http://i.imgur.com/4yDS3Ww.jpg http://i.imgur.com/f9THW67.jpg', '>>{Benediktxvi} : I actually forgot how much "little things" I use on my jailbroken iPhone are not in vanilla iOS', ">>{yuhche} : I'm jailbroken and have this but also have more toggles in CC for other settings. Trash can kills background apps others are self explanatory. http://i.imgur.com/X9kqZUf.jpg", ">>{JustRollWithIt} : DND needs to be schedulable as well. You can set DND to automatically be enabled when you're in meetings by looking at your calendar on Android, and I think that feature actually goes back to the old Blackberries.", '>>{Metriacanthosaurus} : Every time I hear "I want to be able to customize X", I look for what people list as their primary motivations/things they want to change out. And invariably, they fall into niche use cases which don\'t justify a broader customization ability. Lower Power Mode? What is wrong with your phone that you are ever manually engaging Low Power Mode? That is not something you\'re supposed to turn on regularly. "Regularly" being the key word, as the context here is customizing control center...a place where frequently quick action toggles exist. This just isn\'t one of them. I agree with others that Night Shift is oddly placed here since most users will set the auto mode and forget it...But I think that was done on purpose to help discoverability of the feature while it was new. I\'d be willing to bet you\'ll see that swapped out in iOS 11.', '>>{Jimmirehman} : Asking Siri to "turn on low power mode" works', '>>{ballandabiscuit} : People have been hoping that for years and years.', '>>{8errard} : Ugh yes. Every time I want to switch the wi-fi connection I gotta press/swipe 4-5 times. Why?? Also battery saver instead of timer/portrait orientation every day.', ">>{8errard} : Never understood why there's no vibrate/silent toggle in the CC. That's literally the one function most people use at least 5 times a day.", ">>{accountforrunning} : I don't apple wants to put the low power mode on there because it sends the message that the battery life sucks on the phone.", '>>{samturner321} : Hey, are you able to quickly detail how u did your jailbreak?', ">>{Hey0PiggyStyle} : Go to cydiaimpactor.com and download. Go to https://yalu.qwertyoruiop.com If iPhone 7 or Plus, get mach_portal (scroll down), otherwise yalu102 (iPhone 6s etc) Start cydia impactor, drag the yalu102/mach_portal file right in the cydia impactor window, enter Apple id (create a random new one if you want) and then you're done. Open the app om your phone and you're good! More info about jailbreak (safety etc) can be found at /r/jailbreak, check the sidebar! Remember the jb is in beta, it might reboot randomly, then you just start the app again."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{MrBeachBum51} : We should be able to customize the Control Center a little.', ">>{newfonehudis} : It is a bit baffling as to why there is absolutely no customisation for CC other than toggling lock screen and in-app access. I never use airplay or airdrop, and whilst I do use nightshift, I don't really need a toggle because I've set it to auto.", ">>{MrBeachBum51} : Right? That's actually one of the reasons I switched over to android a few years back. I like a lot of customization options in my phones. I'm pretty sure I've never touched the do not disturb toggle button on purpose. So, I don't need it to be there at all.", ">>{taboo007} : Yeah that's one of the big things I miss from Android is to customize the quick settings/CC buttons. I imagine they will try to put the low power mode in this year, I doubt they will put in customization for it.", '>>{MrBeachBum51} : I loved all of the customization options when I had an android. Hopefully Apple will give us a little bit more in the future.', '>>{gdbjr} : I use DND daily. Every time I go into a meeting I enable DND. I have never used low power mode. I am pretty sure Apple is tracking all of this and knows what most people use more. But I do agree about night shift. It is scheduled and I never touch it outside of that schedule.', '>>{Profaniter} : Yes!!! Also auto-brightness too! I want that too. And for the vibrate and sound toggle too!', ">>{swanny246} : I get the feeling Apple thought users would want to toggle Night Shift more than we actually do - for example if doing something that crucially relies on colour. I'd take a Low Power Mode toggle over a Night Shift toggle, or hey, both.", ">>{cocobandicoot} : I would like to see this happen eventually, but until then, there's /r/jailbreak.", ">>{any_other} : Or at least put in long press actions on the buttons. Why can't I hold down the wifi toggle to go to wifi settings. Hey here's this awesome force touch feature we don't implement at all!", '>>{Xeggreo} : You can force touch the settings app and get to the Wifi and bluetooth settings directly.', ">>{STOLEN_JEEP_STUFF} : But why does it have to be 3d touch? It's screwing people that don't have the 6s/7 when a long press works just as well.", ">>{BleedingCatz} : Jesus Christ just fucking jailbreak. You won't get arrested by the Apple police, I promise.", '>>{Ren-Ren-Ren} : Absolutely this! All those toggles should have force touch', '>>{mo2fdwxd} : This is one of the first thing i love from jailbreak, i just 3D touch the wifi sign to show my favorite website, abd btw you can add anything to it-from actionning lte to reboot, its awesome.', ">>{samturner321} : I have iPhone 7 plus, and I heard you can't jailbreak it :( ?", '>>{Clivelethbridge} : You can jailbreak it technically with Mach-portal, however it\'s a little bit "hacky" currently . Once 10.3 is realised you "may" see a more complete jailbreak. There\'s flipcontrolcentre to customise control centre toggles , or ccsettings IF it gets updated to support iOS 10. Hope that helps', '>>{Hey0PiggyStyle} : 10.1 and 10.1.1 is jailbreakable. A little unstable but works great. http://i.imgur.com/4yDS3Ww.jpg http://i.imgur.com/f9THW67.jpg', '>>{Benediktxvi} : I actually forgot how much "little things" I use on my jailbroken iPhone are not in vanilla iOS', ">>{yuhche} : I'm jailbroken and have this but also have more toggles in CC for other settings. Trash can kills background apps others are self explanatory. http://i.imgur.com/X9kqZUf.jpg", ">>{JustRollWithIt} : DND needs to be schedulable as well. You can set DND to automatically be enabled when you're in meetings by looking at your calendar on Android, and I think that feature actually goes back to the old Blackberries.", '>>{Metriacanthosaurus} : Every time I hear "I want to be able to customize X", I look for what people list as their primary motivations/things they want to change out. And invariably, they fall into niche use cases which don\'t justify a broader customization ability. Lower Power Mode? What is wrong with your phone that you are ever manually engaging Low Power Mode? That is not something you\'re supposed to turn on regularly. "Regularly" being the key word, as the context here is customizing control center...a place where frequently quick action toggles exist. This just isn\'t one of them. I agree with others that Night Shift is oddly placed here since most users will set the auto mode and forget it...But I think that was done on purpose to help discoverability of the feature while it was new. I\'d be willing to bet you\'ll see that swapped out in iOS 11.', '>>{Jimmirehman} : Asking Siri to "turn on low power mode" works', '>>{ballandabiscuit} : People have been hoping that for years and years.', '>>{8errard} : Ugh yes. Every time I want to switch the wi-fi connection I gotta press/swipe 4-5 times. Why?? Also battery saver instead of timer/portrait orientation every day.', ">>{8errard} : Never understood why there's no vibrate/silent toggle in the CC. That's literally the one function most people use at least 5 times a day.", ">>{accountforrunning} : I don't apple wants to put the low power mode on there because it sends the message that the battery life sucks on the phone.", '>>{samturner321} : Hey, are you able to quickly detail how u did your jailbreak?', ">>{Hey0PiggyStyle} : Go to cydiaimpactor.com and download. Go to https://yalu.qwertyoruiop.com If iPhone 7 or Plus, get mach_portal (scroll down), otherwise yalu102 (iPhone 6s etc) Start cydia impactor, drag the yalu102/mach_portal file right in the cydia impactor window, enter Apple id (create a random new one if you want) and then you're done. Open the app om your phone and you're good! More info about jailbreak (safety etc) can be found at /r/jailbreak, check the sidebar! Remember the jb is in beta, it might reboot randomly, then you just start the app again."], ['>>{crisss1205} : Most carriers do not do contracts anymore. DPP may be cheaper too.', ">>{Stuffonastick} : The actual cost of the phone starts at $649. Contract (subsidy) pricing is more or less gone. Carriers would much rather you jump on the new pay x for this many months plans which are now extremely prevalent. You can (try) to call up Verizon and see if they'll do a contract plan for you, but don't cross your fingers.", '>>{skee323} : You can definitely order it for $199 through Verizon, I renewed my Contract for 2 years and paid $299 for a jet black 128gb 7. Straight through Apples site. I LOVE Verizon.', '>>{newaptthrowaway} : have heard some carriers can sign you up for a traditional 2 year contract when done over the phone or in store. the downside is that some carriers may have surcharges on their plans in lieu of having a contract. mine actually discounts me for having an installment agreement, which brings it to the cost of a normal rate plan plus contract lol', ">>{TeaP0tty} : Apple Upgrade Program is the cheapest if you don't have a contract. No upfront purchase of the phone, and no extra $20/month for phone & $10/month insurance.", '>>{TeaP0tty} : Carrier contracts are a bad deal now. Apple upgrade program is significantly cheaper.', ">>{skee323} : Apple upgrade program costs almost double what Verizon's 2 year commitment price costs. I don't plan on leaving Verizon for years to come so it's a no brainer for me. (And to any one that can do the math)", ">>{TeaP0tty} : No it doesn't. You have been misinformed, or did the math wrong. Apple Upgrade Program is a 0% interest loan on same price as buying the phone from Apple directly for full price. Through carriers like Verizon you can purchase the phone for a subsidized price, sure. But that doesn't factor the extra $20/month for your phone vs no-contract plan. Then there is $9/month insurance, surely more expensive than Applecare through the upgrade program.", ">>{skee323} : You don't own your phone with the Apple upgrade your program, you are leasing it and returning it every year for a newer one. In order to own it you need to make 24 payments. Which ends up costing you $700+, as opposed to $299 from Verizon. Also I don't pay $20 a month extra for a contract plan or $9 a month for insurance, if I need Apple care I can purchase it through Apple.", ">>{TeaP0tty} : Wrong again. Its a money loan, not a lease on the phone. You get to keep the phone at the end of 2 years. But if you choose the free upgrade after 1 year, you will have to trade in your phone. Carrier contract plans are ALWAYS more expensive than buying the phone in full, which is essentially what you are doing with Apple's upgrade program. With carrier contract, you are definitely paying extra per month, you are just not aware of it.", '>>{skee323} : You are incorrect. I am not paying extra for it. I just went and reviewed my statements and I am not paying any extra fees. Yes, you get to keep your phone at the end of 2 years, but you end up paying more than double the price that I do.', '>>{TeaP0tty} : Its not in your statement as a separate charge. They roll it into line access fee to hide it. Line access fee outside of contract is $20/month, and you pay an additional $15-$20 with contract.', '>>{crisss1205} : What plan are you on? How much is your line fee?'], [">>{ilovemyblueshirt} : I don't see the TV app either after upgrading to 10.2 (iPhone 7 Plus)", ">>{McInnis7} : Maybe US only? I did notice something very weird when upgrading from beta 1, the phone must have crashed during instal cause I went back to software update and it showed beta 2 was still available when I had thought it went through the installation process. So check for the software update again to make sure you're on beta 2.", ">>{BrownsFanZ} : Ok that I can try, I am in the US so I don't think thats the cause.", ">>{tormunds_beard} : I'm in the US and don't have it on the dev beta 2.", ">>{liquid5170} : Tv app replaced the video app however I have both now. Just make sure you didn't have the video app deleted or I heard it's a pain to get the TV app back.", ">>{BrownsFanZ} : No, it wasn't deleted, I just have the Videos app. Are you on a public beta?", '>>{BrownsFanZ} : Yeah probably 3-4. Calendar and Reminders, maybe Stocks and Tips.', '>>{OfficialHoSay} : Are you in the US region? EDIT: NVM', '>>{nd_annajones} : I don\'t have it either. Does anyone know the URL scheme for opening the app? Maybe we can force the "restore app" dialogue', ">>{Sillyoldactivist} : I have the same problem. I deleted the TV by mistake and now I don't know how to get it back. It's not in the list of apps in the app store and neither in my updates/purrchased/not in this phone. When i try to buy a movie it tels me I need to download TV app - I say yes and then it says it's not available in the US app store", ">>{BrownsFanZ} : Sadly I don't think you will be able to get it back till the next beta or the official launch."], ['>>{EliteMerkel} : Poll: Hillary Clinton Solidifies Big Lead On Donald Trump - NBC News', '>>{NuclearShadow} : Not every horse can win the race. The result of this election was obvious to begin with. Much like the 2008 election the president was truly decided by the Democratic primary rather than the general election. When the Republicans present a candidate that simply can\'t win there isn\'t anything to get excited about. This time around with Trump we see Hillary making rather large errors and still she\'s pulling ahead. This isn\'t a praise to Hillary it simply shows how backwards the Republican party has become it\'s becoming unrelatable to anyone but the most extreme. If anyone dissagrees with me on this than let me just point out the internet trolls who massive "support" (through they don\'t really and won\'t be voting for him) Trump. Trolls take the most extreme and objectionable stances to get a rise out of others when you have online trolls on your side you know you\'re views are not rational nor mainstream. On election day I plan on having a nice cup of tea and I am not going to watch the news because spoiler alert, Hillary wins. Instead I am going to watch r/the_donald when the majority of them reveal themselves as trolls and turn on the minority that actually supported Trump.', ">>{BelieveEnemie} : If only it were October and Hillary wasn't a horrible candidate with mountains of pending evidence for corruption that could come crashing down any day.", '>>{tangibleadhd} : After November 8th, Hillary trolls will disappear. The silver lining of this joke of an election.', '>>{lipsyncforyourlife} : Seriously? She avoided indictment, was called out by the FBI chief, and is still polling like this. That was far and away her biggest legal problem and its over.', '>>{BelieveEnemie} : Too many months and debates left. Her health and legal problems will find a way out. Probably in October.', '>>{BatCountry9} : I imagine after election day, a lot of that sub will quickly move on to other pressing matters, like naming new Mountain Dew flavors.', '>>{NuclearShadow} : If you\'re talking about correct the record, they aren\'t trolls. Trolls try to get a rise out of their targets. Correct the record simply operates in 2 ways that isn\'t trolling. 1. They rebuttal attacks on Hillary on the internet. Saying someone is wrong on the internet and giving the facts isn\'t trolling. In-fact I even like this idea with how common lies spread through social media this could be a effective measure to keep people honest and informed. I do believe however that Correct The Record should be obligated to reveal themselves. They should also only focus on credible sources and share such when giving a rebuttal. I highly doubt they are working this ethically however. 2. They work as a PR group by creating fake buzz for Hillary. This also isn\'t trolling it\'s simply making the appearance of more enthusiasm than what someone actually has. This method of doing it online while new the general practice itself isn\'t. The only group that does it more than politicians is the entertainment business. For example let\'s say a teenage musician that a record label put a lot of resources into is going on tour and the first stops tickets aren\'t selling very well they will give away tons of tickets so they can turn around and call it "sold out" which will make the musician appear more popular than they actually are and this hype can genuinely lead to more ticket sales for their next shows. Deceiving? Yes, trolling? No. *edit* Oddly my list is forcing both to be seen as "1" when I put 2 as the second.', ">>{Ximitar} : You think Donald Trump can make it that far without alienating everyone who isn't an undereducated white male, further Twitter meltdowns, bizarre claims and lies and without having his guts pulled out and wrapped around his neck in the debates? I don't.", ">>{barrelofsuperfish} : It feels like we've seen this thread a lot lately. At least they found someone that people are more afraid of then Hillery.", '>>{druuconian} : But I have it on high authority that he is doing very well and that "the Hispanics" love him. Typical corrupt liberal media. Sad!', ">>{InFearn0} : Trump's Trump U trial is scheduled *after* the election. It is unclear what will happen if by some slim chance he becomes the President Elect.", ">>{InFearn0} : Correct The Record is the obvious response to the [Earp Phenomena](https://twitter.com/briandavidearp/status/481304548305555456) (named for Brian D. Earp's hilarious slide show, not because he engages in bullshit). The choices are: 1. Let bullshit stand and taint fact with its stench. 2. Spend the money/effort to combat it.", '>>{SquanchingOnPao} : [I will have my popcorn ready at the debates, if she will show up](https://twitter.com/_AltRight_Anew/status/762718618249367552)', '>>{NuclearShadow} : You do realize if she actually was in ill health and it got to the point where she had to drop out this would only further the crushing of Trump right? Hillary is a unpopular candidate putting someone else in her place will simply make the lead greater.']]

classify and reply

['>>{make_reddit_great} : Why the curious silence from Obama over tapped Trump Tower?', '>>{n_alvarez2007} : Do you keep your phone at 100% as much as possible or do you let it drain?', '>>{JohnDelmont} : Here is the Latest Democrat Attempt to Ruin the American Economy', '>>{lordmycal} : Compared to hiring someone to clean your floors every week? The ROI is definately there.', '>>{Shitposter123456789} : 6 Times Trump Sounded Uncannily Like Putin At His Press Conference', ">>{bigtech100} : Let it drain . Just bought an apple charge case for what it's worth", '>>{micromicboy} : You could get a mop for £2. Why you gotta be so lazy as to pay someone else to do it?', ">>{cajunman4life} : I charge my phone while I'm sleeping at night. If I've used it quite a bit throughout the day then I might put it on the charger a bit to make sure I can make it until I go to bed.", '>>{crsy10} : I don\'t even think they TRY to ruin the economy they just pump out short sighted bullshit to tell their base " see! We\'re fighting for you" even though it\'s not fiscally feasible. Like a national minimum wage or letting poor people get houses they can\'t afford. They essentially represent the worst part about unions.', '>>{guiltyofnothing} : The economy is actually doing pretty well right now...', '>>{mr___} : I try to reduce the total number of discharge/recharge cycles that the phone will experience over its life. so I keep it plugged in as much as possible. (This may seem counterintuitive, but charging it back up from 90% to 100 is 10% of a charge cycle, as opposed to charging it back up from 20% to 100, which is 80% of a charge cycle)', ">>{ILoveDoownvotes} : >The economy is actually doing pretty well right now... Give me $trillions of printed up money and let me lower the interest rates to prop up stocks and I too can make things look far better than they are! > I don't even think they TRY to ruin the economy I agree, but not actually caring who they throw under the bus with their implementations, as they try to gain more political power, comes pretty close! /u/crsy10", '>>{JohnTitor2020} : if Trumps like putin, then The US will implode like russia will once he dies', ">>{willy-beamish} : I don't even think about it. Once it gets down to 20% I'll actively look for a charger. If I know I'm going out after work I'll keep it on charger last hour or so of my shift. Otherwise I just leave on charger along with watch when I go to sleep.", '>>{AkirIkasu} : I like how the title of this article is a plain outright lie. You know what an effective, affordable mop is? A rag from the dollar store. If I want to get fancy I will get a dedicated mop with a high-tech grip-relocater (also known as a stick).', '>>{ayyuslmaous} : Compared to $500 for the next model? Yeah', ">>{whitemest} : Right? And the obstructionist Republicans do *nothing* like that. Also, the economy isn't doing half bad actually, certainly better than its been since the recession (thanks bush)", ">>{crsy10} : Yeah bush let a bunch of poor people buy houses they can't afford", '>>{throwawatc123} : Republicans complaining about how other people go about fixing the economy are like arsonists that complain about how the fire department does their job. In case you forgot, the Republicans are the one who fucked our economy in the first place!', '>>{veridique} : The ventriloquist is doing the talking for the dummy.', ">>{OscarSpecial} : Same reason he didn't want to release his birth certificate. This stupidity isn't with a response.", ">>{meismariah} : Either way, you're still using the same amount of battery.", ">>{lor_de_jaja} : For one, he's retired. Obama also knows the slimy GOP will twist his words like they did to Farkas.", ">>{mr___} : as long as it's plugged in, you're not using any battery. once it hits 100%, you have halted the batteries cycle count until you unplug it.", ">>{lordmycal} : For the same reason I have someone else change the oil in my car. There's only so much time in a day.", '>>{biscuitime} : For all his faults, Putin seems to be in [pretty good shape](http://redefininggod.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/bromance.jpg) for a man his age.', '>>{whitemest} : Oh hey now, can\'t blame Obama for this "shit" economy if you\'re gonna conveniently give bush a free pass man, doesn\'t work like that', ">>{dread_lobster} : Because he's a proper ex-President, and he's a better person than anyone associated with the Moonie Times.", ">>{treebeard47} : Maybe because he's not a thin skinned narcissistic who would feel the need to respond to such an insane claim?", '>>{uvioletpilot} : > These 6 Crazy Facist Moves Will Have You TOTALLY Afraid For Your Future!', ">>{WhyMnemosyne} : This is one of those moron level anti-minimum wage increase articles and one that relies on the whopper of a lie that the $15 would be made in one step. Moron kind of argument including the always a lie, that the increase hurts small businesses when in fact the largest employers of lowest wage employers will lose some of their tax supported workers, and pay wages instead of letting the taxpayer support their employees. Not just WaMart and the retail employers but every corporate ag operation in the nation depends upon these tax supported employees. Wouldn't it make more sense for Red State to be calling to increase the minimum wage and stop that tax payer subsidy to the largest employers and most profitable corporations in the nation?", ">>{N0puppet} : He's like 4 years older than Keanu Reeves in that pic.", '>>{corranhorn85} : But Trump is [“the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency.”](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/09/15/trump-shares-letter-from-his-doctor-saying-he-takes-cholesterol-lowering-drug-is-overweight/?utm_term=.12da0291156e)', ">>{txyesboy} : Have the two of them being spotted together in the last 2 years? NYET! Hmm...I'm sure if Greg Nicotero can make people look like grotesque zombies on TV, he could probably pull off making Vlad look like a grotesque POTUS.", ">>{LemonZesst} : What are you doing that takes up so much time that you don't have 15 minutes, which is how long it would take to do BOTH of those if you don't dick around??", ">>{crsy10} : I didn't blame Obama either lol. But the policies that let a housing bubble create were passed way before bush. It just popped when he was in office so..", ">>{CheetoJesusTheonlyon} : Obama doesn't punch down and he doesn't respond to bullshit. This is crap.", '>>{meismariah} : Oh I guess if you keep it plugged in.', '>>{AGB_mods} : Did they hire someone T_dumb to write the article?', ">>{iushciuweiush} : >It's a real set-it-and-forget-it device. Yea totally sounds like it... >it's rated to cover 200 square feet per charge), only pausing to refill the water tank and swap out the cleaning pads. It's just so easy. All you have to do is set it and hit clean. Then every 200 sq ft you have to remove the battery and charge it, refill the water tank, and swap out the pads! Why spend 15 minutes mopping a 1000 sq ft apartment when you can just charge, refill, and re-pad this thing five times instead?", ">>{BlueSwoosh248} : He doesn't have to dignify this lunacy with a response.", ">>{JohnDelmont} : > Republicans are the one who fucked our economy in the first place! You could not be more wrong. 50 years of entitlement spending that's done nothing to help the poor is the biggest reason our economy is not as robust as it should be. Add to that the housing meltdown that Democrat party leaders Barney Frank, Chris Dodd and Bill Clinton caused brings us to today. And after 7.5 years why hasn't Obama and his handlers improved it? He'll be the only president ever to not have a single year of at least 3% economic growth. So, no.", ">>{gawkershill} : Obama hasn't denied being a lizard person yet either.", ">>{N0puppet} : Why not? He's a billionaire who gets plastic-surgery. If he's taking off his shirt for pics I'm comparing him to Reeves.", '>>{oowowaee} : If someone alleged something blatantly false about me, I don\'t think I\'d be bothered to reply either. "No, I did NOT block out the sun!". Does it really need to be said?', ">>{MortWellian} : He just can't quite him!!! If Trump goes 8 years, things will definitely implode in 2024.", '>>{biscuitime} : Well, shit dude I was just being flippant but Keanu Reeves is a seemingly ageless vampire who looks pretty fucking amazing and Putin is a 64-year-old politician.', ">>{mr___} : The entire duration it's plugged in, even if it's just charging and not at 100%, the phone's functions are being powered from the wall socket. Maybe a better way to state my original statement is that I try to lessen the total energy that is extracted from the battery over its life.", ">>{TwistedMexi} : I own one of these, it really doesn't need to be recharged often. Have to remember a room isn't typically that large when you account for furniture. Have a 2200 sq ft home, 2 floors so really about 1100 upstairs. It can do my kitchen, dining room, and living room in one go. Then I have it do the bathroom and two bedrooms, then take it downstairs to my (large) laundry room/entryway on a 2nd charge. ~3 minutes worth of setup time total to mop my entire house, it doesn't take more than a few seconds to fill and the pads literally just slide on and release right into the trash. First charge should be ready from the get-go because you should have had it on charge from the last time it finished. So only subsequent charges would cause any delay. It also does more than mop (damp and dry sweeping - the dry sweeper catches *everything*) which is helpful for our dogs that shed like crazy. Does it replace actual mopping? No. It is effective though and you'll find your floors stay cleaner longer and you'll need to mop much less frequently.", '>>{TwistedMexi} : If you can mop your whole house and get your car up on a ramp, change your oil, and clean up your tools in 15 minutes, then buddy - you should open up a Mechanic&Maid service.', '>>{ShittyCumSquats} : Putin looks like he wants to castrate Trump for sticking his boneration so close to his separation.', '>>{Soldier-2Point0} : I I always plug it in while driving and while using my MacBook. No reason to waste precious cycles.', '>>{RyanAdamsFamily} : Where are the workers let go due to automation that will surely come with a wage increase go to work? What will be left? Minimum wage jobs were never meant to be permanent jobs that one should expect to be able to comfortably raise a family on.', ">>{Lysergh} : It's not powered directly from the wall socket. The phone cuts off charging current at 100% designated capacity, then lets itself discharge a few %, and then charges again. You're just fooled by its display percentage. You're still using the same amount of energy from the battery. It's still less straining for the battery than discharging and charging a bigger chunk in one go though. Edit: I stand corrected. There are indeed devices that work without battery while connected to the wall socket, so iPhones might be the same.", ">>{le_poofy} : He really doesn't. There are 60 year olds who don't even work out who have more muscle tone than that. He looks like he has the structural integrity of blancemange.", ">>{OnepDoublem} : He's too busy writing his memoirs and Biden his time until Trump is hauled off in tiny handcuffs.", ">>{pnoozi} : I let mine go, but I try to keep it above 30% and usually don't plug it in if it's already above 80%. I only install apps I actually use and only give location access when necessary. It's yielded amazing results so far.", '>>{JohnDelmont} : It would make more sense if we eliminated the minimum wage totally. Doing that would increase employment, expand small business and grow the economy.', ">>{Willie_Green} : Yeah... let's bring back the Hoovervilles of the Great Depression so Americans can experience Poverty the way the Lord intended!", ">>{datwolfe1} : So by leaving it plugged in you aren't harming the battery?", ">>{PARK_THE_BUS} : *Phew*, good thing the president isn't in control of economic fiscal policymaking as that would be a separation of powers issue.", '>>{Onrain} : Correct, iOS is designed to cut off power in order to prevent "over charging" once it lowers down a little it will trickle charge back up to 100% and repeat.', ">>{LemonZesst} : I forgot that I have access to the lift and most people don't do it wouldn't take very long at all honestly, and the mopping all depends on how big your house is and how much of it is even moppable", ">>{spookyttws} : I just realized something. He speaks like an idiot because if he really tried to have a normal, intellectual conversation he'd look like he's dumb...ooh....", ">>{AGB_mods} : He doesn't say crazy things on Twitter = he must be guilty according to the Moonies.", ">>{JohnDelmont} : 'a separation of powers issues' Obama has shown a consistent disdain for the separation of powers in his EO's on illegal aliens and his refusal to work with, compromise with or negotiate with Congress.", ">>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Cause he doesn't have to say shit. He knows what's in store for this treasonous administration", ">>{PARK_THE_BUS} : That's great and all but the topic is about economic policymaking - something that is obviously taken by congress and not the president. You can rant on Obama and his executive orders when the topic calls for it.", ">>{Scrapple666} : He's a lawyer and knows better than to speak when one is involved in an ongoing criminal investigation.", '>>{o_zeta_acosta} : He said he wouldnt be commenting and would try to respect the office as is tradition. Turns out he has scruples and does care about tradition. Nor should he even dignify such accusations with a direct response. Also his people have spoken in his behalf. As did the head of the fbi and nsa.', ">>{SponTen} : I thought small devices (not sure if iPhones, Androids, digital cameras, etc, but I know it's not laptops) would discharge from 100% to about 90-95% then charge back up, instead of taking power straight from the wall?", '>>{bexmex} : No. It would not. 70% of our economy is consumer spending. If you eliminate minimum wage you suck money away from those who spend and give it to those who save. This is a HUGE reason why the economy has recessions. The economy does better for the middle class when Democrats are in charge. The economy hurts the middle class when Republicans are in charge. Pretty much always. If you have EVIDENCE to the contrary you should supply it.', ">>{JohnDelmont} : No. I'll point out your hypocrisy when it is relevant. Obama has chosen to govern by fist & fiat. He's rejected the triumvirate of power sharing that's kept our country balanced for centuries. His failed economic policies and refusal to work with congress are the main reasons for the slow recovery and lack of economic growth.", ">>{roflmyboxes} : You're not harming it, but you're not helping it either, since it's still discharging and recharging, just in lots of small two percent chunks rather than one big eighty percent chunk.", ">>{PARK_THE_BUS} : Wew, there it is again. Let me know when youre ready to accept that the president doesn't control economic policymaking and when your hard on hate for Obama dies down.", '>>{KKsEyes} : Speaking of which, has anyone seen Obama and Batman in the same room together..?', ">>{roflmyboxes} : >as long as it's plugged in, you're not using any battery. once it hits 100%, you have halted the batteries cycle count until you unplug it. That's not true and I'd like to tell you it's not true but first I'd like to ask you if you want to buy some magic beans? There's a torch with your name on it too for the right price. There's a mini light in it which charges the main light's battery via a solar panel, so unlimited energy!!!", ">>{DarkStryder360} : I don't have a choice it's draining all day. I have a charger case because the battery life is so bad. It's perfect when out and about though, and of course, perfect when the phone switches off at 40% and won't turn on again until you find a power source.", ">>{JohnDelmont} : You're wrong. That's the same kind of short-term economic thinking that's created our $19T debt. The theory is that government and consumer spending will keep propelling the economy forward mortgages the future and eventually leads to a crash. The Democrat party has repeatedly built a power base on temporary fixes that always lead to a disaster and subsequent Republican administrations have to come in and clean up the mess. It's time to stop that cycle.", ">>{AGB_mods} : Owned by the Moonie cult. No wonder they love Trump, they're weak and they need a man with small hands to lead them.", ">>{JohnDelmont} : 'the president doesn't control economic policymaking (sic)' You're wrong, yet again. The president sets the tone for all policy making. His refusal to work with congress has been the major obstruction in putting the economy back on track. 'hate for Obama' I don't hate Obama. I can't hate someone I've never met. I take issues with his failed policies but I've no hate for the man. You ought not project in order to hate that which you cannot fathom.", ">>{BuzakaSteve} : Let it drain, that's the point of the phone. If you are in a place where you can charge it at all times then an iPhone is not what you need. Buy an iMac.", '>>{Biggusdickus73} : Where were you during the last "eclipse"?', ">>{AGB_mods} : Unlike all the morons that surround Orange who can't shut up.", '>>{LittleShrub} : Neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false, Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis said in a statement.', '>>{TheRain} : Boy howdy, are they scraping the bottom of the barrel for things to complain about now.', '>>{JimLahee} : The Democrats? Do you even know which party started the significant spending that caused the debt in the first place? Not to mention that our economy is also better off now than it was 8 years ago. I\'m not saying Democrats are gods. But to claim the Republicans come in and fix the "power base" developed by Democrats, that\'s just silly. Both parties are to blame for many if the economic downfalls throughout time. But Republicans definitely are higher credited for the bigger disasters we\'ve seen, especially recently.', '>>{GuitarsAndCameras} : > Doing that would increase employment, expand small business and grow the economy. lol, child like naiveté', ">>{TheSocialDynamicist} : Wow for someone who spends so much time in a politics forum, you really don't seem to have a grasp on how the government works.", ">>{crsy10} : It's a little more complex than that, I'm sure you actually know that and know that's not what I'm saying", ">>{JohnDelmont} : That's not true at all. 50 years of entitlement spending championed by the Democrat party is the single biggest reason our economy suffers.", '>>{kulawik} : While you\'re kinda right, I don\'t think this is how it should be explained. You\'re saying that one can "minimize" battery cycles by doing this, but charge cycles don\'t count 0-100, means that a 20-100 charge is the same as 4 times an 80-100 charge. Both is the same usage time though (although your iPhone will trick you into thinking that it takes longer to drop 100-80 than e.g. 40-20, so it\'s not 100% linear by default). But it\'s still better to do this because deep discharging and then charging puts a lot more stress in the battery than "tipping off".', '>>{PARK_THE_BUS} : Sets the tone =! Actual policy making Let me know when the president does the latter', ">>{Osucowboysfan} : I let it drain and don't recharge until it's <20%.", ">>{mr___} : source for your claim that the phone does not actually power itself from the connected charger? That's how other phones work", ">>{GuitarsAndCameras} : Poor people didn't create collateralized debt obligations and poor people didn't bribe credit rating companies.", '>>{WhyMnemosyne} : Can you show us a nation where this is working where it has ever worked?', '>>{kescusay} : I\'d like to challenge /u/make_reddit_great to respond to this. The article asserts that Obama had been "silent." The quote above says otherwise. Which is accurate?', '>>{JohnDelmont} : Are you trying to claim the president does not make policy?', ">>{JohnDelmont} : We're the United States of America. The greatest nation in world history. What works for other nations would never work here without destroying that which made us great. 'us' Who is 'us'? Are you speaking for all of Reddit? r/politics? the Democrat party?", '>>{aledlewis} : Because (a) he is enjoying watching Trump implode. Trump is desperate for Obama to engage so he can spa with him. And (b) what a dumb question.', ">>{lipby} : He's on some South Pacific island, writing his memoirs while sipping margaritas and occasionally boning Michelle.", '>>{Undeadfungas} : this is not a real news source.. Washington Time is like a cult church letter that has gone crazry', '>>{i_am_bullitt} : The Obama camp denied it the day it was said. Why should he have to continue to deny it when nothing has changed since Trump made those baseless accusations?', ">>{mr___} : do you have a source for that? that's not how pretty much any other device with a lithium ion charge controller works", ">>{WhyMnemosyne} : I'll just take that dodge as evidence there is no nation of any worth without a minimum wage, tax supported education and a health care system.", ">>{mr___} : i'm honestly curious, do you have a source for that statement? I have seen no evidence that the phone does not power itself from the plugged-in charger", ">>{SaltHash} : Obama is not required to disprove Donnie's B.S. Donnie is responsible for the [burden of proof](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_burden_of_proof) of his claims.", ">>{JohnDelmont} : Truth is truth. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean you need to miscategorize it.", ">>{JohnDelmont} : No. I don't need to. I was extremely clear and concise.", '>>{bassististist} : He issued a denial via his Press Rep. GTFO Washington Times.', ">>{mr___} : why do you think that? That's not how charge controllers generally work", '>>{Sussay} : President O is on a well-earned vacation & knows better than to swing at a bad pitch.', ">>{Lysergh} : [This is the article](https://www.google.pl/amp/s/www.gottabemobile.com/can-you-leave-your-iphone-charging-overnight/amp/). From what I gather most phones work that way. I'm aware that the article might be wrong, so feel free to correct me.", ">>{AssholeTrump} : It's not his place to comment. They can subpoena him if they'd like.", ">>{CarrierCucked} : Exactly. I'm glad someone is asking the right questions finally. Show some leadership obama and disavow this on twitter!", '>>{mr___} : that\'s an "organic advertising" blog, which quotes popular mechanics. it\'s pretty easy to prove it to yourself like I just did, get a phone that has removable battery, plug in the charger, then remove the battery. On the two phones I just now tried it on, the phone remained on. that is in line with my experience of how charge controller chips work, based on building circuits around them.', ">>{Lysergh} : That's a fair point that I didn't think about. Unless Apple has a special design I guess you're correct.", ">>{JimLahee} : Yeah that's what I thought. Vague information. Republicans are best known for that.", '>>{TechniCruller} : No matter what I do this fucking publication refuses to stop sending me its newspaper.', ">>{JohnDelmont} : 'clear and concise' 'vague' These are not the same thing", ">>{JimLahee} : No they aren't. But I was disagreeing that you were clear and concise.", ">>{WakaiSenshi} : In the end it's all up to the user. Charging your phone a lot to keep it above 80% will not harm your device nor will it harm the battery as well as charging it from 10-100%. Batteries naturally age no matter how often you charge your device. There have been studies done to show what happens when you charge your device a lot vs when you barely do it at all and they all pointed to the same conclusion: You'll never actually notice any real change for a long time. The batteries we use today are far more advanced than the batteries used 10-15 years ago. Edit: I charge my phone whenever I next to a plug, but that's not really that often. I'm always mobile so whenever I have a chance I'll charge it, but most of the time it sits around 30-70%", ">>{LurkerPatrol} : I keep it charged while sleeping, get up in the morning, use constantly until I get in car, and I plug it into the USB there for music etc and also for charging. I occasionally use maps to check the best route to work, but don't need GPS after that as I'm used to the different routes now. I go to work, and use the shit out of it. If I'm staying late and the charge drops below 50%, I charge it at my desk. If I'm not staying late, I charge it in the car on the way home, get home and charge it at night. I don't think my phone ever drops below 35-40%. That's with using the camera, facebook, snapchat, telegram, reddit alien blue, some games, VSCO cam, Instagram, and of course messages and phone. Also none of my chargers are wall plugs, they are all braided USB cables plugged into a computer of some sort (or my car's USB)", '>>{Jatilq} : Is this one of those Russian "employees" mentioned yesterday, spreading these type of stories?', ">>{CaptainAxiomatic} : Sensible people don't need to be convinced it's false. Trumpniks can't (or won't) be convinced it's false.", '>>{JohnDelmont} : I was? 50 years of entitlement spending championed by the Democrat party is the single biggest reason our economy suffers What is unclear about that?', ">>{AccountSave} : Smart Battery case master race? It never leaves 100 unless I'm out somewhere quick and will just use the phone without a battery case.", ">>{papichuloooo} : I'm one of those paranoid people who hates when the battery starts to drain, even if it's at 81%. I charge it whenever I can, sometimes even when it's already at 100%. If I know I have somewhere to be in an hour and my phone is at 97% I still keep it on charge until I have to leave. Edit: Even during my classes, I'll sit next to an outlet and charge my phone whenever I can. My phone rarely drops below 50% and I like it that way.", '>>{sleaze_bag_alert} : The guys that manufacture paper blankets and jacket stuffers for D.C. homeless people have a website?! /s', ">>{dskatter} : I charge it at night, and whenever I'm near an outlet. Modern batteries like to be charged, and letting them drain often is actually harder on current batteries than keeping them topped up. I don't understand people who let their iPhones drain over and over again when they're near outlets...yes, you CAN let it drain, but why? I keep that sucker charged as much as possible. Who knows if you'll need that full battery in an emergency or something?", '>>{JimLahee} : entitlement spending comes from both parties actually. But not quite as disastrous on the left. So elaborate on how Democrats are the problem with spending, how do Republicans fix these power base issues? Not just state a vague statement how Democrats have done worse than Republicans.', '>>{RyanAdamsFamily} : Okay smarty pants, where should these minimum age workers that are displaced after the wage increase go to find employment?', ">>{guiltyofnothing} : I would like to hear you elaborate too for what it's worth.", ">>{SponTen} : I only think it because I've been told that by engineers before :P I could be entirely wrong, but I was just told it was to save space in mobile devices. They can't fit another wire between the port and the power supply to bypass the battery, whereas in larger devices like laptops, they can.", '>>{Darkeyescry22} : Scrap the minimum wage, implement a consumption tax and UBI, and increase the UBI as permanent unemployment increases, until we have full unemployment and everyone is able to rely on automation to do all work.', ">>{frontierparty} : We need to get to the bottom of this. Also why he wasn't in the White House on 9/11.", '>>{mr___} : The port definitely goes to a chip that both the phone and battery are connected (separately) to. the chip directs power to the battery in controlled amounts to charge it, and regulates the current coming out of the battery or charger to power the phone', '>>{treerat} : Sorry, its was ruined by Bush before the democrat came into office. Dow was at 7900 when Obama took office. Dow is now over 18000. Its the democrats fault.', ">>{wil_daven_} : Quite simply, Obama knows not to feed the dragon. He doesn't need to say a thing. TrumpCo has made a total disaster of it all on their own.", ">>{PutinPuppetTrump} : He's busy enjoying life after a successful Presidency? Anywho, Obama will be back. Count on it.", ">>{JohnDelmont} : 'not quite as disastrous on the left' That's not at all true. The Democrat party has been pushing and implementing a transfer of wealth from the middle class to government since LBJ's 'Great Society' vision. It's been an abject failure that's done little for the lower class and only grown the leviathan that is big government.", ">>{JohnDelmont} : 'Dow is now over 18000' Sounds to me like you're happy Obama enriched the fat cats on Wall Street and corporations. Is that accurate?", ">>{PutinPuppetTrump} : Obama isn't a complete fuck up like President Puppet. He'll reinsert himself when it can make a difference and it is critical. President Puppet is sabotaging his Presidency all by himself and doesn't need any help. >“Never interfere with your enemy when he is making a mistake.” -Napoleon or Sun Tzu or both. It's unclear but it's solid strategy.", ">>{solarect} : They weren't intended for that, no. But you can't even survive supporting yourself working a full time minimum wage job if you have bills.", '>>{BananaParadise} : Right, but you reduce the wear on the battery. Shallow discharged drastically prolongs battery lifespan', '>>{RyanAdamsFamily} : Then you should either get an education to get a better job or find a second job. I had to work two jobs for a time in my life.', ">>{SponTen} : Huh. I'll take your word for it, but yeah that just means I've heard conflicting things now.", '>>{__fuckeverything__} : As soon as he steps forward the news cycle starts being about him instead of being about Trump and his bullshit where it needs to be. And once he steps forward once they will want him to do it again and again. Also, retired presidents do not comment on sitting ones unless absolutely necessary it\'s just an unwritten rule and Obama is a classy person who is letting Trump be Trump and letting him ruin his presidency on his own if not then it would be "OH EVERYTHING WAS FINE TIL OBAMA STARTED ATTACKING HIM"', ">>{solarect} : > get an education With what money? FASFA won't give you shit if your parents make too much, and you make too little to afford a college education on your own.. That leaves the option of being forced into crippling debt for the foreseeable future.", '>>{RyanAdamsFamily} : Take classes part time and work. There are vocational schools that offer great educations in various trades. None of them require crippling debt. There are ways to do it. One just has to work hard and apply oneself.', '>>{RyanAdamsFamily} : Or just down vote and keep working to suck on the government tit your whole life.', ">>{WhyMnemosyne} : /lol, same place they have always gone to their now higher paying minimum wage job. When are you going to get tired of paying the taxes that pays for the deficiency of their incomes via E.I.T.C. and by paying for their groceries, housing and health care so the employers get cheaper labor? (Dear Mods, last sentence is rhetorical in nature and intent and not directed personally at /u/RyanAdamsFamily) You like taxes that support the employer, the same taxes they refuse to pay. It just doesn't pay to be a conservative peon, it costs you.", '>>{probation_420} : Why the curious silence from u/oowowaee over blocked-out sun?', ">>{RyanAdamsFamily} : You do understand that a $15 minimum wage makes automation in both retail and food service much more likely. Where do they go then? Oh wait, there isn't anywhere to go.", '>>{diurnal_emissions} : This grainy black and white photo from the Apollo missions clearly shows Obama lives on the dark side of the moon in a reptile alien space pyramid. This makes him technically a Moonie.', ">>{diurnal_emissions} : According to The Watchtower, Jesus forgives Trump for Russia, so let's all move on. Please send donations.", '>>{snarkerz} : What would be the point in arguing with a lunatic with shit on his face.', '>>{diurnal_emissions} : Nope, founded by the *actual* God Emperor, [Sun Myung Moon](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Myung_Moon).', '>>{tau-lepton} : Never get in the way of your opponent hitting themselves in the face.', ">>{RyanAdamsFamily} : I'm not some conservative peon either. I pay my taxes. I went to school and worked hard. Application is what it often times takes. A concept freeloaders like yourself fail to recognize.", ">>{awesomeness0232} : Because he's a private citizen who doesn't have to give the time of day to the rantings and ravings of a madman.", '>>{WhyMnemosyne} : YOou are going to get automation anyway, and if not automation more illegal and legal immigrant workers. They do appreciate that you are willing to starve and watch y our neighbors starve so the wealthy can get wealthier. Do you think that $15 is going to be granted in one step?', ">>{cavortingwebeasties} : I don't know what his excuse was, but Superman was in a wheelchair.", ">>{Vlascor} : Everyone knows Obama and Superman are the same. Biden is Batman. That's why Obama and Biden were so cool with each other.", '>>{ashmortar} : The Washington Times research department might want to try a little harder. I Googled Obama wiretapping spokesman and, viola http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-accuses-obama-wiretapping-residence-during-campaign-n729056 From March 4th, you know, the day trump tweeted about wiretapping, "In response, Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis roundly rejected Trump\'s claims that the previous administration had ordered surveillance at his New York City residence". Oops.', ">>{WhyMnemosyne} : If your college education is 80s or earlier, you got the free ride and if at a private college a heavily subsidized ride yourself. Or if you worked your way through on a minimum wage job, why don't minimum wage jobs now pay enough to do the same. They don't even support a person now, minimum wage never mind paying tuition and buying books.", ">>{SamaelMorningstar} : this joke is so dark it it's weak against bug types.", ">>{RyanAdamsFamily} : I worked a minimum wage job and it was never intended to pay for college. It provided gas money and a little extra cash. I had a partial scholarship and took out loans to pay for my college and graduate degree education. I'm still paying those loans.", '>>{RyanAdamsFamily} : Our food stamp government will make sure no one starves.', ">>{WhyMnemosyne} : So you are fine with having your start in life crippled with debt and since you have the debt so should everyone? I don't get it.", ">>{RyanAdamsFamily} : I'm not crippled with debt but I had to take some on to get where I wanted to go. The debt isn't a big deal if you have a plan to pay it off. I'm almost done paying mine. 2k to go.", ">>{WhyMnemosyne} : I don't think that is a rational response to wealth theft oppression and exploitation, endorsing it and wishing it for everyone.", ">>{RyanAdamsFamily} : I have never felt repressed and exploited for a second. You're lucky you were born in America kid, you wouldn't make it anywhere else (except Sweden).", '>>{WhyMnemosyne} : I am embarrassed that you support loans for higher education.', ">>{RyanAdamsFamily} : What? I could never have gone to college withou said loans. Why is that embarrassing? I took out 27k in loans to land a job that pays well over six figures. That doesn't seem like a bad investment. Who else would pay for it!?! Don't say rich people because they can't cover the tab for everyone.", '>>{RyanAdamsFamily} : Exactly. You want free without knowing how to pay for it. Thought so.', ">>{solarect} : Excuse me? I work 50 hours a week and don't take part in any welfare programs. Don't get your panties in a bunch because you're losing your precious karma. Grow up.", '>>{WhyMnemosyne} : I am glad that expensive education taught you how to deliver meaningless conservative talking points.', '>>{RyanAdamsFamily} : Actually, it reinforced the value of hard work coupled with education will allow for one to live the American Dream.', '>>{WhyMnemosyne} : Not when you can be replaced with a much cheaper H1B visa worker and now the MSM message; is you who borrowed for college were all fools for not foreseeing the globalized market of that commodity labor labeled; and that includes educated labor.', ">>{RyanAdamsFamily} : Actually, I oversee a government regulated function that must be filled by an American citizen, so no worries for me! I'm gaining leadership and consulting experience in a compliance and regulatory sector that cannot be filled by foreign workers.", '>>{WhyMnemosyne} : You will believe you are exempt until they day your job is handed over. Even after the Snowden leaks, the private for profit contractors doint the electronic controlled intelligence work, continue to use extremely talented data collectors who are foreign born.', ">>{RyanAdamsFamily} : It's actually illegal to have foreign non-American citizens do the work that I do - and that is not going to change.", ">>{WhyMnemosyne} : You forget the people behind this current election campaign care not about national security, they care only about securing and enhancing their personal wealth and power. Nationalism is not on the agenda of the current reigning outlaws and they aren't humble little Muslim terrorists running around with bombs on their belts and Assault weapons on their backs. They sit in offices furnished with fine antique furniture and illegally gained bragging piece antiquities, and make deals with the people allowed to hold office and serve at their pleasure.", '>>{RyanAdamsFamily} : Well, considering I work in a regulated industry that helps contribute to both national security and the elected officials wealth and power I must be in good good hands.', ">>{WhyMnemosyne} : I think you missed the anti-nationalism I referred to, it isn't just a U.S. phenomenon, it is global and powerful and this election, all fake just delivered the only tool they need, the President who will sign off on it all and that will be Hillary or Trump, they don't care which."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{Shitposter123456789} : 6 Times Trump Sounded Uncannily Like Putin At His Press Conference', '>>{JohnTitor2020} : if Trumps like putin, then The US will implode like russia will once he dies', '>>{veridique} : The ventriloquist is doing the talking for the dummy.', '>>{biscuitime} : For all his faults, Putin seems to be in [pretty good shape](http://redefininggod.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/bromance.jpg) for a man his age.', '>>{uvioletpilot} : > These 6 Crazy Facist Moves Will Have You TOTALLY Afraid For Your Future!', ">>{N0puppet} : He's like 4 years older than Keanu Reeves in that pic.", '>>{corranhorn85} : But Trump is [“the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency.”](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/09/15/trump-shares-letter-from-his-doctor-saying-he-takes-cholesterol-lowering-drug-is-overweight/?utm_term=.12da0291156e)', ">>{txyesboy} : Have the two of them being spotted together in the last 2 years? NYET! Hmm...I'm sure if Greg Nicotero can make people look like grotesque zombies on TV, he could probably pull off making Vlad look like a grotesque POTUS.", ">>{N0puppet} : Why not? He's a billionaire who gets plastic-surgery. If he's taking off his shirt for pics I'm comparing him to Reeves.", ">>{MortWellian} : He just can't quite him!!! If Trump goes 8 years, things will definitely implode in 2024.", '>>{biscuitime} : Well, shit dude I was just being flippant but Keanu Reeves is a seemingly ageless vampire who looks pretty fucking amazing and Putin is a 64-year-old politician.', '>>{ShittyCumSquats} : Putin looks like he wants to castrate Trump for sticking his boneration so close to his separation.', ">>{le_poofy} : He really doesn't. There are 60 year olds who don't even work out who have more muscle tone than that. He looks like he has the structural integrity of blancemange.", ">>{spookyttws} : I just realized something. He speaks like an idiot because if he really tried to have a normal, intellectual conversation he'd look like he's dumb...ooh...."], ['>>{n_alvarez2007} : Do you keep your phone at 100% as much as possible or do you let it drain?', ">>{bigtech100} : Let it drain . Just bought an apple charge case for what it's worth", ">>{cajunman4life} : I charge my phone while I'm sleeping at night. If I've used it quite a bit throughout the day then I might put it on the charger a bit to make sure I can make it until I go to bed.", '>>{mr___} : I try to reduce the total number of discharge/recharge cycles that the phone will experience over its life. so I keep it plugged in as much as possible. (This may seem counterintuitive, but charging it back up from 90% to 100 is 10% of a charge cycle, as opposed to charging it back up from 20% to 100, which is 80% of a charge cycle)', ">>{willy-beamish} : I don't even think about it. Once it gets down to 20% I'll actively look for a charger. If I know I'm going out after work I'll keep it on charger last hour or so of my shift. Otherwise I just leave on charger along with watch when I go to sleep.", ">>{meismariah} : Either way, you're still using the same amount of battery.", ">>{mr___} : as long as it's plugged in, you're not using any battery. once it hits 100%, you have halted the batteries cycle count until you unplug it.", '>>{meismariah} : Oh I guess if you keep it plugged in.', ">>{mr___} : The entire duration it's plugged in, even if it's just charging and not at 100%, the phone's functions are being powered from the wall socket. Maybe a better way to state my original statement is that I try to lessen the total energy that is extracted from the battery over its life.", '>>{Soldier-2Point0} : I I always plug it in while driving and while using my MacBook. No reason to waste precious cycles.', ">>{Lysergh} : It's not powered directly from the wall socket. The phone cuts off charging current at 100% designated capacity, then lets itself discharge a few %, and then charges again. You're just fooled by its display percentage. You're still using the same amount of energy from the battery. It's still less straining for the battery than discharging and charging a bigger chunk in one go though. Edit: I stand corrected. There are indeed devices that work without battery while connected to the wall socket, so iPhones might be the same.", ">>{pnoozi} : I let mine go, but I try to keep it above 30% and usually don't plug it in if it's already above 80%. I only install apps I actually use and only give location access when necessary. It's yielded amazing results so far.", ">>{datwolfe1} : So by leaving it plugged in you aren't harming the battery?", '>>{Onrain} : Correct, iOS is designed to cut off power in order to prevent "over charging" once it lowers down a little it will trickle charge back up to 100% and repeat.', ">>{SponTen} : I thought small devices (not sure if iPhones, Androids, digital cameras, etc, but I know it's not laptops) would discharge from 100% to about 90-95% then charge back up, instead of taking power straight from the wall?", ">>{roflmyboxes} : You're not harming it, but you're not helping it either, since it's still discharging and recharging, just in lots of small two percent chunks rather than one big eighty percent chunk.", ">>{roflmyboxes} : >as long as it's plugged in, you're not using any battery. once it hits 100%, you have halted the batteries cycle count until you unplug it. That's not true and I'd like to tell you it's not true but first I'd like to ask you if you want to buy some magic beans? There's a torch with your name on it too for the right price. There's a mini light in it which charges the main light's battery via a solar panel, so unlimited energy!!!", ">>{DarkStryder360} : I don't have a choice it's draining all day. I have a charger case because the battery life is so bad. It's perfect when out and about though, and of course, perfect when the phone switches off at 40% and won't turn on again until you find a power source.", ">>{BuzakaSteve} : Let it drain, that's the point of the phone. If you are in a place where you can charge it at all times then an iPhone is not what you need. Buy an iMac.", '>>{kulawik} : While you\'re kinda right, I don\'t think this is how it should be explained. You\'re saying that one can "minimize" battery cycles by doing this, but charge cycles don\'t count 0-100, means that a 20-100 charge is the same as 4 times an 80-100 charge. Both is the same usage time though (although your iPhone will trick you into thinking that it takes longer to drop 100-80 than e.g. 40-20, so it\'s not 100% linear by default). But it\'s still better to do this because deep discharging and then charging puts a lot more stress in the battery than "tipping off".', ">>{Osucowboysfan} : I let it drain and don't recharge until it's <20%.", ">>{mr___} : source for your claim that the phone does not actually power itself from the connected charger? That's how other phones work", ">>{mr___} : do you have a source for that? that's not how pretty much any other device with a lithium ion charge controller works", ">>{mr___} : i'm honestly curious, do you have a source for that statement? I have seen no evidence that the phone does not power itself from the plugged-in charger", ">>{mr___} : why do you think that? That's not how charge controllers generally work", ">>{Lysergh} : [This is the article](https://www.google.pl/amp/s/www.gottabemobile.com/can-you-leave-your-iphone-charging-overnight/amp/). From what I gather most phones work that way. I'm aware that the article might be wrong, so feel free to correct me.", '>>{mr___} : that\'s an "organic advertising" blog, which quotes popular mechanics. it\'s pretty easy to prove it to yourself like I just did, get a phone that has removable battery, plug in the charger, then remove the battery. On the two phones I just now tried it on, the phone remained on. that is in line with my experience of how charge controller chips work, based on building circuits around them.', ">>{Lysergh} : That's a fair point that I didn't think about. Unless Apple has a special design I guess you're correct.", ">>{WakaiSenshi} : In the end it's all up to the user. Charging your phone a lot to keep it above 80% will not harm your device nor will it harm the battery as well as charging it from 10-100%. Batteries naturally age no matter how often you charge your device. There have been studies done to show what happens when you charge your device a lot vs when you barely do it at all and they all pointed to the same conclusion: You'll never actually notice any real change for a long time. The batteries we use today are far more advanced than the batteries used 10-15 years ago. Edit: I charge my phone whenever I next to a plug, but that's not really that often. I'm always mobile so whenever I have a chance I'll charge it, but most of the time it sits around 30-70%", ">>{LurkerPatrol} : I keep it charged while sleeping, get up in the morning, use constantly until I get in car, and I plug it into the USB there for music etc and also for charging. I occasionally use maps to check the best route to work, but don't need GPS after that as I'm used to the different routes now. I go to work, and use the shit out of it. If I'm staying late and the charge drops below 50%, I charge it at my desk. If I'm not staying late, I charge it in the car on the way home, get home and charge it at night. I don't think my phone ever drops below 35-40%. That's with using the camera, facebook, snapchat, telegram, reddit alien blue, some games, VSCO cam, Instagram, and of course messages and phone. Also none of my chargers are wall plugs, they are all braided USB cables plugged into a computer of some sort (or my car's USB)", ">>{AccountSave} : Smart Battery case master race? It never leaves 100 unless I'm out somewhere quick and will just use the phone without a battery case.", ">>{papichuloooo} : I'm one of those paranoid people who hates when the battery starts to drain, even if it's at 81%. I charge it whenever I can, sometimes even when it's already at 100%. If I know I have somewhere to be in an hour and my phone is at 97% I still keep it on charge until I have to leave. Edit: Even during my classes, I'll sit next to an outlet and charge my phone whenever I can. My phone rarely drops below 50% and I like it that way.", ">>{dskatter} : I charge it at night, and whenever I'm near an outlet. Modern batteries like to be charged, and letting them drain often is actually harder on current batteries than keeping them topped up. I don't understand people who let their iPhones drain over and over again when they're near outlets...yes, you CAN let it drain, but why? I keep that sucker charged as much as possible. Who knows if you'll need that full battery in an emergency or something?", ">>{SponTen} : I only think it because I've been told that by engineers before :P I could be entirely wrong, but I was just told it was to save space in mobile devices. They can't fit another wire between the port and the power supply to bypass the battery, whereas in larger devices like laptops, they can.", '>>{mr___} : The port definitely goes to a chip that both the phone and battery are connected (separately) to. the chip directs power to the battery in controlled amounts to charge it, and regulates the current coming out of the battery or charger to power the phone', '>>{BananaParadise} : Right, but you reduce the wear on the battery. Shallow discharged drastically prolongs battery lifespan', ">>{SponTen} : Huh. I'll take your word for it, but yeah that just means I've heard conflicting things now."], ['>>{make_reddit_great} : Why the curious silence from Obama over tapped Trump Tower?', ">>{OscarSpecial} : Same reason he didn't want to release his birth certificate. This stupidity isn't with a response.", ">>{lor_de_jaja} : For one, he's retired. Obama also knows the slimy GOP will twist his words like they did to Farkas.", ">>{dread_lobster} : Because he's a proper ex-President, and he's a better person than anyone associated with the Moonie Times.", ">>{treebeard47} : Maybe because he's not a thin skinned narcissistic who would feel the need to respond to such an insane claim?", ">>{CheetoJesusTheonlyon} : Obama doesn't punch down and he doesn't respond to bullshit. This is crap.", '>>{AGB_mods} : Did they hire someone T_dumb to write the article?', ">>{BlueSwoosh248} : He doesn't have to dignify this lunacy with a response.", ">>{gawkershill} : Obama hasn't denied being a lizard person yet either.", '>>{oowowaee} : If someone alleged something blatantly false about me, I don\'t think I\'d be bothered to reply either. "No, I did NOT block out the sun!". Does it really need to be said?', ">>{OnepDoublem} : He's too busy writing his memoirs and Biden his time until Trump is hauled off in tiny handcuffs.", ">>{AGB_mods} : He doesn't say crazy things on Twitter = he must be guilty according to the Moonies.", ">>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Cause he doesn't have to say shit. He knows what's in store for this treasonous administration", ">>{Scrapple666} : He's a lawyer and knows better than to speak when one is involved in an ongoing criminal investigation.", '>>{o_zeta_acosta} : He said he wouldnt be commenting and would try to respect the office as is tradition. Turns out he has scruples and does care about tradition. Nor should he even dignify such accusations with a direct response. Also his people have spoken in his behalf. As did the head of the fbi and nsa.', '>>{KKsEyes} : Speaking of which, has anyone seen Obama and Batman in the same room together..?', ">>{AGB_mods} : Owned by the Moonie cult. No wonder they love Trump, they're weak and they need a man with small hands to lead them.", '>>{Biggusdickus73} : Where were you during the last "eclipse"?', ">>{AGB_mods} : Unlike all the morons that surround Orange who can't shut up.", '>>{LittleShrub} : Neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false, Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis said in a statement.', '>>{TheRain} : Boy howdy, are they scraping the bottom of the barrel for things to complain about now.', '>>{kescusay} : I\'d like to challenge /u/make_reddit_great to respond to this. The article asserts that Obama had been "silent." The quote above says otherwise. Which is accurate?', '>>{aledlewis} : Because (a) he is enjoying watching Trump implode. Trump is desperate for Obama to engage so he can spa with him. And (b) what a dumb question.', ">>{lipby} : He's on some South Pacific island, writing his memoirs while sipping margaritas and occasionally boning Michelle.", '>>{Undeadfungas} : this is not a real news source.. Washington Time is like a cult church letter that has gone crazry', '>>{i_am_bullitt} : The Obama camp denied it the day it was said. Why should he have to continue to deny it when nothing has changed since Trump made those baseless accusations?', ">>{SaltHash} : Obama is not required to disprove Donnie's B.S. Donnie is responsible for the [burden of proof](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_burden_of_proof) of his claims.", '>>{bassististist} : He issued a denial via his Press Rep. GTFO Washington Times.', '>>{Sussay} : President O is on a well-earned vacation & knows better than to swing at a bad pitch.', ">>{AssholeTrump} : It's not his place to comment. They can subpoena him if they'd like.", ">>{CarrierCucked} : Exactly. I'm glad someone is asking the right questions finally. Show some leadership obama and disavow this on twitter!", '>>{TechniCruller} : No matter what I do this fucking publication refuses to stop sending me its newspaper.', '>>{Jatilq} : Is this one of those Russian "employees" mentioned yesterday, spreading these type of stories?', ">>{CaptainAxiomatic} : Sensible people don't need to be convinced it's false. Trumpniks can't (or won't) be convinced it's false.", '>>{sleaze_bag_alert} : The guys that manufacture paper blankets and jacket stuffers for D.C. homeless people have a website?! /s', ">>{frontierparty} : We need to get to the bottom of this. Also why he wasn't in the White House on 9/11.", ">>{wil_daven_} : Quite simply, Obama knows not to feed the dragon. He doesn't need to say a thing. TrumpCo has made a total disaster of it all on their own.", ">>{PutinPuppetTrump} : He's busy enjoying life after a successful Presidency? Anywho, Obama will be back. Count on it.", ">>{PutinPuppetTrump} : Obama isn't a complete fuck up like President Puppet. He'll reinsert himself when it can make a difference and it is critical. President Puppet is sabotaging his Presidency all by himself and doesn't need any help. >“Never interfere with your enemy when he is making a mistake.” -Napoleon or Sun Tzu or both. It's unclear but it's solid strategy.", '>>{__fuckeverything__} : As soon as he steps forward the news cycle starts being about him instead of being about Trump and his bullshit where it needs to be. And once he steps forward once they will want him to do it again and again. Also, retired presidents do not comment on sitting ones unless absolutely necessary it\'s just an unwritten rule and Obama is a classy person who is letting Trump be Trump and letting him ruin his presidency on his own if not then it would be "OH EVERYTHING WAS FINE TIL OBAMA STARTED ATTACKING HIM"', '>>{probation_420} : Why the curious silence from u/oowowaee over blocked-out sun?', '>>{diurnal_emissions} : This grainy black and white photo from the Apollo missions clearly shows Obama lives on the dark side of the moon in a reptile alien space pyramid. This makes him technically a Moonie.', ">>{diurnal_emissions} : According to The Watchtower, Jesus forgives Trump for Russia, so let's all move on. Please send donations.", '>>{snarkerz} : What would be the point in arguing with a lunatic with shit on his face.', '>>{diurnal_emissions} : Nope, founded by the *actual* God Emperor, [Sun Myung Moon](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Myung_Moon).', '>>{tau-lepton} : Never get in the way of your opponent hitting themselves in the face.', ">>{awesomeness0232} : Because he's a private citizen who doesn't have to give the time of day to the rantings and ravings of a madman.", ">>{cavortingwebeasties} : I don't know what his excuse was, but Superman was in a wheelchair.", ">>{Vlascor} : Everyone knows Obama and Superman are the same. Biden is Batman. That's why Obama and Biden were so cool with each other.", '>>{ashmortar} : The Washington Times research department might want to try a little harder. I Googled Obama wiretapping spokesman and, viola http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-accuses-obama-wiretapping-residence-during-campaign-n729056 From March 4th, you know, the day trump tweeted about wiretapping, "In response, Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis roundly rejected Trump\'s claims that the previous administration had ordered surveillance at his New York City residence". Oops.', ">>{SamaelMorningstar} : this joke is so dark it it's weak against bug types."], ['>>{JohnDelmont} : Here is the Latest Democrat Attempt to Ruin the American Economy', '>>{crsy10} : I don\'t even think they TRY to ruin the economy they just pump out short sighted bullshit to tell their base " see! We\'re fighting for you" even though it\'s not fiscally feasible. Like a national minimum wage or letting poor people get houses they can\'t afford. They essentially represent the worst part about unions.', '>>{guiltyofnothing} : The economy is actually doing pretty well right now...', ">>{ILoveDoownvotes} : >The economy is actually doing pretty well right now... Give me $trillions of printed up money and let me lower the interest rates to prop up stocks and I too can make things look far better than they are! > I don't even think they TRY to ruin the economy I agree, but not actually caring who they throw under the bus with their implementations, as they try to gain more political power, comes pretty close! /u/crsy10", ">>{whitemest} : Right? And the obstructionist Republicans do *nothing* like that. Also, the economy isn't doing half bad actually, certainly better than its been since the recession (thanks bush)", ">>{crsy10} : Yeah bush let a bunch of poor people buy houses they can't afford", '>>{throwawatc123} : Republicans complaining about how other people go about fixing the economy are like arsonists that complain about how the fire department does their job. In case you forgot, the Republicans are the one who fucked our economy in the first place!', '>>{whitemest} : Oh hey now, can\'t blame Obama for this "shit" economy if you\'re gonna conveniently give bush a free pass man, doesn\'t work like that', ">>{WhyMnemosyne} : This is one of those moron level anti-minimum wage increase articles and one that relies on the whopper of a lie that the $15 would be made in one step. Moron kind of argument including the always a lie, that the increase hurts small businesses when in fact the largest employers of lowest wage employers will lose some of their tax supported workers, and pay wages instead of letting the taxpayer support their employees. Not just WaMart and the retail employers but every corporate ag operation in the nation depends upon these tax supported employees. Wouldn't it make more sense for Red State to be calling to increase the minimum wage and stop that tax payer subsidy to the largest employers and most profitable corporations in the nation?", ">>{crsy10} : I didn't blame Obama either lol. But the policies that let a housing bubble create were passed way before bush. It just popped when he was in office so..", ">>{JohnDelmont} : > Republicans are the one who fucked our economy in the first place! You could not be more wrong. 50 years of entitlement spending that's done nothing to help the poor is the biggest reason our economy is not as robust as it should be. Add to that the housing meltdown that Democrat party leaders Barney Frank, Chris Dodd and Bill Clinton caused brings us to today. And after 7.5 years why hasn't Obama and his handlers improved it? He'll be the only president ever to not have a single year of at least 3% economic growth. So, no.", '>>{RyanAdamsFamily} : Where are the workers let go due to automation that will surely come with a wage increase go to work? What will be left? Minimum wage jobs were never meant to be permanent jobs that one should expect to be able to comfortably raise a family on.', '>>{JohnDelmont} : It would make more sense if we eliminated the minimum wage totally. Doing that would increase employment, expand small business and grow the economy.', ">>{Willie_Green} : Yeah... let's bring back the Hoovervilles of the Great Depression so Americans can experience Poverty the way the Lord intended!", ">>{PARK_THE_BUS} : *Phew*, good thing the president isn't in control of economic fiscal policymaking as that would be a separation of powers issue.", ">>{JohnDelmont} : 'a separation of powers issues' Obama has shown a consistent disdain for the separation of powers in his EO's on illegal aliens and his refusal to work with, compromise with or negotiate with Congress.", ">>{PARK_THE_BUS} : That's great and all but the topic is about economic policymaking - something that is obviously taken by congress and not the president. You can rant on Obama and his executive orders when the topic calls for it.", '>>{bexmex} : No. It would not. 70% of our economy is consumer spending. If you eliminate minimum wage you suck money away from those who spend and give it to those who save. This is a HUGE reason why the economy has recessions. The economy does better for the middle class when Democrats are in charge. The economy hurts the middle class when Republicans are in charge. Pretty much always. If you have EVIDENCE to the contrary you should supply it.', ">>{JohnDelmont} : No. I'll point out your hypocrisy when it is relevant. Obama has chosen to govern by fist & fiat. He's rejected the triumvirate of power sharing that's kept our country balanced for centuries. His failed economic policies and refusal to work with congress are the main reasons for the slow recovery and lack of economic growth.", ">>{PARK_THE_BUS} : Wew, there it is again. Let me know when youre ready to accept that the president doesn't control economic policymaking and when your hard on hate for Obama dies down.", ">>{JohnDelmont} : You're wrong. That's the same kind of short-term economic thinking that's created our $19T debt. The theory is that government and consumer spending will keep propelling the economy forward mortgages the future and eventually leads to a crash. The Democrat party has repeatedly built a power base on temporary fixes that always lead to a disaster and subsequent Republican administrations have to come in and clean up the mess. It's time to stop that cycle.", ">>{JohnDelmont} : 'the president doesn't control economic policymaking (sic)' You're wrong, yet again. The president sets the tone for all policy making. His refusal to work with congress has been the major obstruction in putting the economy back on track. 'hate for Obama' I don't hate Obama. I can't hate someone I've never met. I take issues with his failed policies but I've no hate for the man. You ought not project in order to hate that which you cannot fathom.", '>>{JimLahee} : The Democrats? Do you even know which party started the significant spending that caused the debt in the first place? Not to mention that our economy is also better off now than it was 8 years ago. I\'m not saying Democrats are gods. But to claim the Republicans come in and fix the "power base" developed by Democrats, that\'s just silly. Both parties are to blame for many if the economic downfalls throughout time. But Republicans definitely are higher credited for the bigger disasters we\'ve seen, especially recently.', '>>{GuitarsAndCameras} : > Doing that would increase employment, expand small business and grow the economy. lol, child like naiveté', ">>{TheSocialDynamicist} : Wow for someone who spends so much time in a politics forum, you really don't seem to have a grasp on how the government works.", ">>{crsy10} : It's a little more complex than that, I'm sure you actually know that and know that's not what I'm saying", ">>{JohnDelmont} : That's not true at all. 50 years of entitlement spending championed by the Democrat party is the single biggest reason our economy suffers.", '>>{PARK_THE_BUS} : Sets the tone =! Actual policy making Let me know when the president does the latter', ">>{GuitarsAndCameras} : Poor people didn't create collateralized debt obligations and poor people didn't bribe credit rating companies.", '>>{WhyMnemosyne} : Can you show us a nation where this is working where it has ever worked?', '>>{JohnDelmont} : Are you trying to claim the president does not make policy?', ">>{JohnDelmont} : We're the United States of America. The greatest nation in world history. What works for other nations would never work here without destroying that which made us great. 'us' Who is 'us'? Are you speaking for all of Reddit? r/politics? the Democrat party?", ">>{WhyMnemosyne} : I'll just take that dodge as evidence there is no nation of any worth without a minimum wage, tax supported education and a health care system.", ">>{JohnDelmont} : Truth is truth. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean you need to miscategorize it.", ">>{JohnDelmont} : No. I don't need to. I was extremely clear and concise.", ">>{JimLahee} : Yeah that's what I thought. Vague information. Republicans are best known for that.", ">>{JohnDelmont} : 'clear and concise' 'vague' These are not the same thing", ">>{JimLahee} : No they aren't. But I was disagreeing that you were clear and concise.", '>>{JohnDelmont} : I was? 50 years of entitlement spending championed by the Democrat party is the single biggest reason our economy suffers What is unclear about that?', '>>{JimLahee} : entitlement spending comes from both parties actually. But not quite as disastrous on the left. So elaborate on how Democrats are the problem with spending, how do Republicans fix these power base issues? Not just state a vague statement how Democrats have done worse than Republicans.', '>>{RyanAdamsFamily} : Okay smarty pants, where should these minimum age workers that are displaced after the wage increase go to find employment?', ">>{guiltyofnothing} : I would like to hear you elaborate too for what it's worth.", '>>{Darkeyescry22} : Scrap the minimum wage, implement a consumption tax and UBI, and increase the UBI as permanent unemployment increases, until we have full unemployment and everyone is able to rely on automation to do all work.', '>>{treerat} : Sorry, its was ruined by Bush before the democrat came into office. Dow was at 7900 when Obama took office. Dow is now over 18000. Its the democrats fault.', ">>{JohnDelmont} : 'not quite as disastrous on the left' That's not at all true. The Democrat party has been pushing and implementing a transfer of wealth from the middle class to government since LBJ's 'Great Society' vision. It's been an abject failure that's done little for the lower class and only grown the leviathan that is big government.", ">>{JohnDelmont} : 'Dow is now over 18000' Sounds to me like you're happy Obama enriched the fat cats on Wall Street and corporations. Is that accurate?", ">>{solarect} : They weren't intended for that, no. But you can't even survive supporting yourself working a full time minimum wage job if you have bills.", '>>{RyanAdamsFamily} : Then you should either get an education to get a better job or find a second job. I had to work two jobs for a time in my life.', ">>{solarect} : > get an education With what money? FASFA won't give you shit if your parents make too much, and you make too little to afford a college education on your own.. That leaves the option of being forced into crippling debt for the foreseeable future.", '>>{RyanAdamsFamily} : Take classes part time and work. There are vocational schools that offer great educations in various trades. None of them require crippling debt. There are ways to do it. One just has to work hard and apply oneself.', '>>{RyanAdamsFamily} : Or just down vote and keep working to suck on the government tit your whole life.', ">>{WhyMnemosyne} : /lol, same place they have always gone to their now higher paying minimum wage job. When are you going to get tired of paying the taxes that pays for the deficiency of their incomes via E.I.T.C. and by paying for their groceries, housing and health care so the employers get cheaper labor? (Dear Mods, last sentence is rhetorical in nature and intent and not directed personally at /u/RyanAdamsFamily) You like taxes that support the employer, the same taxes they refuse to pay. It just doesn't pay to be a conservative peon, it costs you.", ">>{RyanAdamsFamily} : You do understand that a $15 minimum wage makes automation in both retail and food service much more likely. Where do they go then? Oh wait, there isn't anywhere to go.", ">>{RyanAdamsFamily} : I'm not some conservative peon either. I pay my taxes. I went to school and worked hard. Application is what it often times takes. A concept freeloaders like yourself fail to recognize.", '>>{WhyMnemosyne} : YOou are going to get automation anyway, and if not automation more illegal and legal immigrant workers. They do appreciate that you are willing to starve and watch y our neighbors starve so the wealthy can get wealthier. Do you think that $15 is going to be granted in one step?', ">>{WhyMnemosyne} : If your college education is 80s or earlier, you got the free ride and if at a private college a heavily subsidized ride yourself. Or if you worked your way through on a minimum wage job, why don't minimum wage jobs now pay enough to do the same. They don't even support a person now, minimum wage never mind paying tuition and buying books.", ">>{RyanAdamsFamily} : I worked a minimum wage job and it was never intended to pay for college. It provided gas money and a little extra cash. I had a partial scholarship and took out loans to pay for my college and graduate degree education. I'm still paying those loans.", '>>{RyanAdamsFamily} : Our food stamp government will make sure no one starves.', ">>{WhyMnemosyne} : So you are fine with having your start in life crippled with debt and since you have the debt so should everyone? I don't get it.", ">>{RyanAdamsFamily} : I'm not crippled with debt but I had to take some on to get where I wanted to go. The debt isn't a big deal if you have a plan to pay it off. I'm almost done paying mine. 2k to go.", ">>{WhyMnemosyne} : I don't think that is a rational response to wealth theft oppression and exploitation, endorsing it and wishing it for everyone.", ">>{RyanAdamsFamily} : I have never felt repressed and exploited for a second. You're lucky you were born in America kid, you wouldn't make it anywhere else (except Sweden).", '>>{WhyMnemosyne} : I am embarrassed that you support loans for higher education.', ">>{RyanAdamsFamily} : What? I could never have gone to college withou said loans. Why is that embarrassing? I took out 27k in loans to land a job that pays well over six figures. That doesn't seem like a bad investment. Who else would pay for it!?! Don't say rich people because they can't cover the tab for everyone.", '>>{RyanAdamsFamily} : Exactly. You want free without knowing how to pay for it. Thought so.', ">>{solarect} : Excuse me? I work 50 hours a week and don't take part in any welfare programs. Don't get your panties in a bunch because you're losing your precious karma. Grow up.", '>>{WhyMnemosyne} : I am glad that expensive education taught you how to deliver meaningless conservative talking points.', '>>{RyanAdamsFamily} : Actually, it reinforced the value of hard work coupled with education will allow for one to live the American Dream.', '>>{WhyMnemosyne} : Not when you can be replaced with a much cheaper H1B visa worker and now the MSM message; is you who borrowed for college were all fools for not foreseeing the globalized market of that commodity labor labeled; and that includes educated labor.', ">>{RyanAdamsFamily} : Actually, I oversee a government regulated function that must be filled by an American citizen, so no worries for me! I'm gaining leadership and consulting experience in a compliance and regulatory sector that cannot be filled by foreign workers.", '>>{WhyMnemosyne} : You will believe you are exempt until they day your job is handed over. Even after the Snowden leaks, the private for profit contractors doint the electronic controlled intelligence work, continue to use extremely talented data collectors who are foreign born.', ">>{RyanAdamsFamily} : It's actually illegal to have foreign non-American citizens do the work that I do - and that is not going to change.", ">>{WhyMnemosyne} : You forget the people behind this current election campaign care not about national security, they care only about securing and enhancing their personal wealth and power. Nationalism is not on the agenda of the current reigning outlaws and they aren't humble little Muslim terrorists running around with bombs on their belts and Assault weapons on their backs. They sit in offices furnished with fine antique furniture and illegally gained bragging piece antiquities, and make deals with the people allowed to hold office and serve at their pleasure.", '>>{RyanAdamsFamily} : Well, considering I work in a regulated industry that helps contribute to both national security and the elected officials wealth and power I must be in good good hands.', ">>{WhyMnemosyne} : I think you missed the anti-nationalism I referred to, it isn't just a U.S. phenomenon, it is global and powerful and this election, all fake just delivered the only tool they need, the President who will sign off on it all and that will be Hillary or Trump, they don't care which."], ['>>{lordmycal} : Compared to hiring someone to clean your floors every week? The ROI is definately there.', '>>{micromicboy} : You could get a mop for £2. Why you gotta be so lazy as to pay someone else to do it?', '>>{AkirIkasu} : I like how the title of this article is a plain outright lie. You know what an effective, affordable mop is? A rag from the dollar store. If I want to get fancy I will get a dedicated mop with a high-tech grip-relocater (also known as a stick).', '>>{ayyuslmaous} : Compared to $500 for the next model? Yeah', ">>{lordmycal} : For the same reason I have someone else change the oil in my car. There's only so much time in a day.", ">>{LemonZesst} : What are you doing that takes up so much time that you don't have 15 minutes, which is how long it would take to do BOTH of those if you don't dick around??", ">>{iushciuweiush} : >It's a real set-it-and-forget-it device. Yea totally sounds like it... >it's rated to cover 200 square feet per charge), only pausing to refill the water tank and swap out the cleaning pads. It's just so easy. All you have to do is set it and hit clean. Then every 200 sq ft you have to remove the battery and charge it, refill the water tank, and swap out the pads! Why spend 15 minutes mopping a 1000 sq ft apartment when you can just charge, refill, and re-pad this thing five times instead?", ">>{TwistedMexi} : I own one of these, it really doesn't need to be recharged often. Have to remember a room isn't typically that large when you account for furniture. Have a 2200 sq ft home, 2 floors so really about 1100 upstairs. It can do my kitchen, dining room, and living room in one go. Then I have it do the bathroom and two bedrooms, then take it downstairs to my (large) laundry room/entryway on a 2nd charge. ~3 minutes worth of setup time total to mop my entire house, it doesn't take more than a few seconds to fill and the pads literally just slide on and release right into the trash. First charge should be ready from the get-go because you should have had it on charge from the last time it finished. So only subsequent charges would cause any delay. It also does more than mop (damp and dry sweeping - the dry sweeper catches *everything*) which is helpful for our dogs that shed like crazy. Does it replace actual mopping? No. It is effective though and you'll find your floors stay cleaner longer and you'll need to mop much less frequently.", '>>{TwistedMexi} : If you can mop your whole house and get your car up on a ramp, change your oil, and clean up your tools in 15 minutes, then buddy - you should open up a Mechanic&Maid service.', ">>{LemonZesst} : I forgot that I have access to the lift and most people don't do it wouldn't take very long at all honestly, and the mopping all depends on how big your house is and how much of it is even moppable"]]

classify and reply

['>>{greenareureal} : That is why it should be made illegal. It gives those things in blue an excuse to constantly kill us.', ">>{Aarondo99} : When you sync, it'll tell you you have media on your phone, and ask if you want it moved to your laptop. And dude, take a chill pill.", ">>{EzzoMahfouz} : I pressed sync, it didn't ask me whether I wanted to copy or not but it said 'copying' in the progress bar above. I tried adding my music assuming it synced but to no avail. Did I misunderstand you?", ">>{MacNCheezOnUrKneez} : Mother of Backpacker Slain in Australia Criticizes Trump's False Claim That It Was a Terrorist Attack", '>>{cocobandicoot} : 1. Calm down. 2. The reason why this is happening is because iTunes doesn\'t have any way of knowing that this is the same computer you\'ve always had — the entire computer was erased as set up as a "new" computer, and so iTunes — along with any other software on your computer — is going to believe this is an entirely new PC. It\'s not a fault of iTunes, it\'s just the way of things. When you go to sync your music, you\'ll get that dreaded message that your iPhone\'s content will have to be erased and replaced with content on your "new" iTunes library. Rest assured that the only content that gets erased is your music, so no worries about losing any other information on your iPhone. As long as all the music that is on your iPhone is also in your iTunes library, then you shouldn\'t be losing anything then, right? While it might take a little time for it to remove everything / re-add it, it\'ll work and you\'ll be back up and running in no time. 3. Calm down.', ">>{EzzoMahfouz} : Sigh. I did have to re-download a few albums but what else am I gonna do... Obviously I'm frustrated because I couldn't have seen this coming a mile away. This is my first time owning an iPhone, and while I'm absolutely loving it, I've always been wary of the iOS ecosystem that many say is 'boxed in'. At least it's only the music that's getting deleted!", '>>{cocobandicoot} : > I\'ve always been wary of the iOS ecosystem that many say is \'boxed in\'. I can definitely understand some of your concerns. For the most part, you won\'t often run into issues with the "closed" ecosystem that iOS has — in fact, there can be many benefits to it, especially when it comes to being integrated with other Apple devices. That being said, the issue you experienced is certainly an annoying one. It\'s a holdover from many years ago (back when the iPod first came out). Although they don\'t really say why they have this system in place, the real reason is because, back when the iPod first came out, Apple had to play nice with all the big music companies / record labels at a time when piracy was a very big deal to them. As a result, Apple put this system in place so that if you had an iPod, you couldn\'t just stick all your music on it, and then run to a friends\' house and share all your thousands of songs onto their computer, and then their songs with yours, and so and so forth. So that\'s why when your computer saw that you iPhone was connected to "another" computer\'s iTunes library, it freaked out and said no. Rest assured that it\'s something you don\'t see much anymore, but as long as you still have all that same music in iTunes, you won\'t be heavily affected by it. Also, glad you\'re liking the iPhone so far!', '>>{dagwood222} : Seriously, who would know more about what really happened; the mother of the victim or some guy who read about the incident on Twitter? Obviously, the mother is in cahoots with Hillary Clinton. Sad.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : This is just common sense gun legislation. Why in the world do people think it's a great idea to open carry AR-15s? I get it may be more convenient for you, but the unease you'd set in the public far, far, far outweighs that convenience.", ">>{crisss1205} : And that's why I always tell people to backup their devices.", ">>{BravoTangoFoxObama} : It did but what of it? There are always consequences in the exercise of constitutional rights. Heinous idiots like westboro baptist church are what we have to endure for the right to free expression. Open carry made this particular incident more confusing when identifying a suspect. This is the downside of people exercising their right to bear arms. For the most part though, they are endangering themselves in these situations. I mean, don't blame the police from checking you as a suspect if you are walking around with a rifle during a shooting.", ">>{DBDude} : Nobody's unease is enough to violate a right. Two gays kissing makes some people physically ill, so should that be banned?", ">>{dagwood222} : I'm actually going to try something new. Instead of the 's/' I'm going to end Trump related comments with 'Thanks Obama.' What do you think?", '>>{MacNCheezOnUrKneez} : I\'ve seen that before. You should just end it with " - MAGA"', '>>{jcfac} : > This is just common sense gun legislation Does it infringe on the right for people to keep and bear arms?', ">>{Aarondo99} : That's weird. Usually comes up when I do it (constantly switching between a MacBook and an iMac).", ">>{thatmffm} : I'm glad to see you got this figured out, just wanted to throw some advice your way to mitigate future frustrations- Keep an iCloud backup of your data, and a Google Play backup of your music and you'll never have to worry about losing anything :)", ">>{Kinases} : Regulating a right isn't the same thing as violating it.", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : Two gays kissing isn't a weapon. Why is openly carrying a weapon, which will cause -significant- public unease a good idea?", '>>{EzzoMahfouz} : Thanks for the advice, I appreciate it! I downloaded iCloud for PC rn so I can start downloading my stuff.', '>>{dagwood222} : No. It feels like using a swasticka ironically.', ">>{thatmffm} : I don't know what you downloaded, but delete it and run a virus scan immediately lol.... seriously. iCloud backup is built into the phone. Go to Settings>iCloud.", '>>{sookeysam} : >Police in Australia allege that suspect Smail Ayad shouted "Allahu akbar" — an Arabic phrase meaning "God is great" — during the attack, but said there was no indication the assault was motivated by extremism. No indication? Shouting the same slogan as Islamist terrorists around the world while murdering this girl, a guy who tried to help her, and a dog seems like a pretty obvious indicator.', '>>{chirkle} : Should anything that\'s not a "good idea" be illegal?', '>>{Pharmtekbobby} : There were at least 20 people carrying guns...and none of them did anything.', ">>{i_smell_my_poop} : That's pretty much what happened here. The legal open carriers fully cooperated with police and then went along their way. It was a non issue to everyone except people who don't like guns.", ">>{dagwood222} : Dude, we're almost 20 years into the war on terror, don't you think it's time to actually educate yourself about the enemy? 'Allahu akbar' was a part of Islam for hundreds of years before the war. It's like saying that everyone who uses a 'Rebel yell' wants to secede from the US.", '>>{west2night} : So you believe you know the case better than the parents, the police in France and Australia, and the court?', ">>{deezmutts} : The people carrying guns didn't have to do anything because they are not cops. The police were there running towards the gun fire while the marchers/protestors were running away. They had numerous cops on the ground and one can easily ID and confiscate the weapon of someone carrying to determine the potential threat. I'm not sure of the details but had this guy just gone into a crowd of people and started shooting, perhaps we would be praising the open carry law. But since this guy was sniping from a parking garage, what's the average Joe open carry going to do? I think the police did a good job given the situation. No civilians were injured aside from the injuries caused by the actual shooter.", ">>{sookeysam} : >'Allahu akbar' was a part of Islam for hundreds of years before the war. So was [oppression](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jizya), [genocide](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamidian_massacres), [slavery](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_slave_trade#7th_century_to_20th_century) and [piracy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_pirates). No doubt using the same catchy slogan.", ">>{Ins_Weltall} : Two guys kissing doesn't have the capability of killing someone in a split second. It doesn't require trusting them to not be a crazy person to be sure you're not going to die around them. I mean, I grew up around guns and enjoy them, but c'mon. They're dangerous when you can't trust who's brandishing them in public. Carrying them openly is nothing but a display of how easily you can end somebody's life.", '>>{sookeysam} : What would the parents really know? As far as at least the French authorities, their track record with rooting out Islamist connections is far from stellar. The Aussie courts are still determining if he is fit to stand trial, but crazy and terrorist are not mutually exclusive categories.', '>>{dagwood222} : Genius! The American flag flew over slave plantations and internment camps, I guess that means every American thought those things were great!', '>>{RidleyScotch} : > > As far as at least the French authorities, their track record with rooting out Islamist connections is far from stellar. > i feel as if if that disqualifies french authorities then it sure as heck disqualifies american ones here too', '>>{Kinases} : Do you think people should be allowed to take loaded rifles onto commercial flights?', '>>{Kinases} : If there is negligible benefit with a potentially high cost, sure.', '>>{sftbert} : It may have been an issue for the police killed if officers who could have been helping look for the real shooter were too tied up with the open carry nuts.', ">>{sookeysam} : If the prepetrators consistently yelled 'Praise Jesus' every time they whipped a slave, shot a Native American, or threw a Japanese person in a camp - then I guess it would be comprable, but still less brutal. Cultural relativists need to give their head a shake.", '>>{sftbert} : I have never heard a decent reason to open carry and there are a ton of good reasons to not allow it.', '>>{sookeysam} : That is why extreme vetting procedures need to be developed, and why suspected terrorists (also their friends and families) need to be more aggressively investigated/monitored.', ">>{dagwood222} : Yes, every single Muslim is a terrorist. Which is why there are so many Muslims who have helped us in our fight. Because it's just a trick to get us to lower our guard.", '>>{chirkle} : Who makes those determinations? You, personally? Or is there some sort of committee?', '>>{Kinases} : Voters, legislators etc. Same way that we make any determination. Pretty much every law we make is a cost-benefit analysis/judgement call of some sort.', ">>{sookeysam} : >Yes, every single Muslim is a terrorist. Never said that. This 'not all' non-argument is played out. I am saying that Smail Ayad pretty obviously is.", ">>{Kinases} : I'm sorry, but if you think carrying a loaded weapon onto, say, a 747 headed for New York is reasonable than there's really no point in having a discussion about gun control. You're an extremist and the effort would be wasted on you.", '>>{MacNCheezOnUrKneez} : > So was oppression, genocide, slavery and piracy. That could be said about every religion.', '>>{Kinases} : > The legal open carriers fully cooperated with police and then went along their way The funny thing is, everyone is a "legal open carrier"...until they\'re not.', '>>{Kinases} : Or, you know, the government can pass laws to ensure public safety with regards to what we can legally bring on the plane. Hence TSA and all that jazz. Anyways, my question isn\'t really getting at "would you follow the rules of an airline/the TSA", what I\'m getting at is trying to gauge what you think is reasonable.', ">>{dagwood222} : I am saying that Smail Ayad pretty obviously is. Because you've spent more time studying the case then the victim's mother.", ">>{Kinases} : So in your world, the government exists to protect your right to have a gun on you at all times, but there's no role for the government in setting common-sense airline security standards that could prevent someone from *easily* hijacking a plane. Even the NRA isn't fighting to allow people to take guns on commercial flights. I'll refer back to my previous comment - you're a fringe extremist.", '>>{DBHT14} : Police work is only easy in a police state. At some point there does need to be a line and it sucks for law enforcement doing an honest job have to work harder, but police doing policing is just a means to an end, not the end itself.', '>>{sftbert} : Open carry serves no purpose other than to allow the under endowed gun nuts a chance to intimidate people with their big plastic and metal guns.', ">>{DBDude} : > which will cause -significant- public unease This is the criteria here. To conservatives, two gays kissing does cause significant public unease. Nobody's rights should be subject to the comfort level of others. If it were, most of our speech would be banned.", '>>{sftbert} : That is a big leap. I am ok with licensed concealed carry provided there is a licensing process that includes both some classroom and range training.', '>>{sookeysam} : Throughout the entire span of human history maybe. That being said, *some* religions have engaged in these practices (while exclaiming the greatness of their god) more recently and to a greater degree than others.', '>>{usernameson} : I think that the Australian authorities are insulting our intelligence and that of their people. We know the reason for this. They want there to be less panic among the population about receiving infinity muslim migrants. Too bad they think lying to their own people is a valid way of achieving this. If a man randomly starts killing people he is committing an attack. Shouting "Allah Ackbar" betrays his motive. To claim that this was not an islamic inspired attack is ludicrous. If someone wants to play semantics and say this is not terrorism because he wasn\'t in contact with a terorist organization, then fine. But it was an islamic inspired attack sothe result is the same: people being less comfortable letting muslims into their country or into their presence. The mother of the victim, sorry to say, is a nut. Her daughter was murdered by a muslim and she responded by gathering money for muslim refugees at her funeral. Now she is claiming that if the man wasn\'t praying 5 times a day then he wasn\'t a muslim. Right. Because so many non-muslims shout the islamic call to battle, "Allah Ackbar." I guess in her book you practically have to be an imam to have your behavior linked with islam. She is just delusional.', '>>{MacNCheezOnUrKneez} : > Because so many non-muslims shout the islamic call to battle, "Allah Ackbar." It\'s "Allahu Akbar" (الله أكبر) and it\'s not an "Islamic battle cry". It literally means "GOD IS GREAT" and Arab Christians, like myself, say it all the time as well. Contrary to popular belief, Muslims don\'t have a trademark on the word "Allah" it\'s been in use for thousands of years.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : Then explain why openly carrying a weapon like an AR-15 is a good idea? If it isn't a good idea, then there shouldn't be an issue with legislation banning open carry.", ">>{DBDude} : >Then explain why openly carrying a weapon like an AR-15 is a good idea? As protest it's as good an idea as the gay guy wearing the thong and boa. >If it isn't a good idea, then there shouldn't be an issue with legislation banning open carry. With the whole AIDS thing, two gays having unprotected casual sex isn't a good idea either, so there shouldn't be an issue banning it, right? Freedom means a lot of people get to do things that you don't think are a good idea. The hard part in freedom is encouraging their right to do it."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{greenareureal} : That is why it should be made illegal. It gives those things in blue an excuse to constantly kill us.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : This is just common sense gun legislation. Why in the world do people think it's a great idea to open carry AR-15s? I get it may be more convenient for you, but the unease you'd set in the public far, far, far outweighs that convenience.", ">>{BravoTangoFoxObama} : It did but what of it? There are always consequences in the exercise of constitutional rights. Heinous idiots like westboro baptist church are what we have to endure for the right to free expression. Open carry made this particular incident more confusing when identifying a suspect. This is the downside of people exercising their right to bear arms. For the most part though, they are endangering themselves in these situations. I mean, don't blame the police from checking you as a suspect if you are walking around with a rifle during a shooting.", ">>{DBDude} : Nobody's unease is enough to violate a right. Two gays kissing makes some people physically ill, so should that be banned?", '>>{jcfac} : > This is just common sense gun legislation Does it infringe on the right for people to keep and bear arms?', ">>{Kinases} : Regulating a right isn't the same thing as violating it.", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : Two gays kissing isn't a weapon. Why is openly carrying a weapon, which will cause -significant- public unease a good idea?", '>>{chirkle} : Should anything that\'s not a "good idea" be illegal?', '>>{Pharmtekbobby} : There were at least 20 people carrying guns...and none of them did anything.', ">>{i_smell_my_poop} : That's pretty much what happened here. The legal open carriers fully cooperated with police and then went along their way. It was a non issue to everyone except people who don't like guns.", ">>{deezmutts} : The people carrying guns didn't have to do anything because they are not cops. The police were there running towards the gun fire while the marchers/protestors were running away. They had numerous cops on the ground and one can easily ID and confiscate the weapon of someone carrying to determine the potential threat. I'm not sure of the details but had this guy just gone into a crowd of people and started shooting, perhaps we would be praising the open carry law. But since this guy was sniping from a parking garage, what's the average Joe open carry going to do? I think the police did a good job given the situation. No civilians were injured aside from the injuries caused by the actual shooter.", ">>{Ins_Weltall} : Two guys kissing doesn't have the capability of killing someone in a split second. It doesn't require trusting them to not be a crazy person to be sure you're not going to die around them. I mean, I grew up around guns and enjoy them, but c'mon. They're dangerous when you can't trust who's brandishing them in public. Carrying them openly is nothing but a display of how easily you can end somebody's life.", '>>{Kinases} : Do you think people should be allowed to take loaded rifles onto commercial flights?', '>>{Kinases} : If there is negligible benefit with a potentially high cost, sure.', '>>{sftbert} : It may have been an issue for the police killed if officers who could have been helping look for the real shooter were too tied up with the open carry nuts.', '>>{sftbert} : I have never heard a decent reason to open carry and there are a ton of good reasons to not allow it.', '>>{chirkle} : Who makes those determinations? You, personally? Or is there some sort of committee?', '>>{Kinases} : Voters, legislators etc. Same way that we make any determination. Pretty much every law we make is a cost-benefit analysis/judgement call of some sort.', ">>{Kinases} : I'm sorry, but if you think carrying a loaded weapon onto, say, a 747 headed for New York is reasonable than there's really no point in having a discussion about gun control. You're an extremist and the effort would be wasted on you.", '>>{Kinases} : > The legal open carriers fully cooperated with police and then went along their way The funny thing is, everyone is a "legal open carrier"...until they\'re not.', '>>{Kinases} : Or, you know, the government can pass laws to ensure public safety with regards to what we can legally bring on the plane. Hence TSA and all that jazz. Anyways, my question isn\'t really getting at "would you follow the rules of an airline/the TSA", what I\'m getting at is trying to gauge what you think is reasonable.', ">>{Kinases} : So in your world, the government exists to protect your right to have a gun on you at all times, but there's no role for the government in setting common-sense airline security standards that could prevent someone from *easily* hijacking a plane. Even the NRA isn't fighting to allow people to take guns on commercial flights. I'll refer back to my previous comment - you're a fringe extremist.", '>>{DBHT14} : Police work is only easy in a police state. At some point there does need to be a line and it sucks for law enforcement doing an honest job have to work harder, but police doing policing is just a means to an end, not the end itself.', '>>{sftbert} : Open carry serves no purpose other than to allow the under endowed gun nuts a chance to intimidate people with their big plastic and metal guns.', ">>{DBDude} : > which will cause -significant- public unease This is the criteria here. To conservatives, two gays kissing does cause significant public unease. Nobody's rights should be subject to the comfort level of others. If it were, most of our speech would be banned.", '>>{sftbert} : That is a big leap. I am ok with licensed concealed carry provided there is a licensing process that includes both some classroom and range training.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : Then explain why openly carrying a weapon like an AR-15 is a good idea? If it isn't a good idea, then there shouldn't be an issue with legislation banning open carry.", ">>{DBDude} : >Then explain why openly carrying a weapon like an AR-15 is a good idea? As protest it's as good an idea as the gay guy wearing the thong and boa. >If it isn't a good idea, then there shouldn't be an issue with legislation banning open carry. With the whole AIDS thing, two gays having unprotected casual sex isn't a good idea either, so there shouldn't be an issue banning it, right? Freedom means a lot of people get to do things that you don't think are a good idea. The hard part in freedom is encouraging their right to do it."], [">>{MacNCheezOnUrKneez} : Mother of Backpacker Slain in Australia Criticizes Trump's False Claim That It Was a Terrorist Attack", '>>{dagwood222} : Seriously, who would know more about what really happened; the mother of the victim or some guy who read about the incident on Twitter? Obviously, the mother is in cahoots with Hillary Clinton. Sad.', ">>{dagwood222} : I'm actually going to try something new. Instead of the 's/' I'm going to end Trump related comments with 'Thanks Obama.' What do you think?", '>>{MacNCheezOnUrKneez} : I\'ve seen that before. You should just end it with " - MAGA"', '>>{dagwood222} : No. It feels like using a swasticka ironically.', '>>{sookeysam} : >Police in Australia allege that suspect Smail Ayad shouted "Allahu akbar" — an Arabic phrase meaning "God is great" — during the attack, but said there was no indication the assault was motivated by extremism. No indication? Shouting the same slogan as Islamist terrorists around the world while murdering this girl, a guy who tried to help her, and a dog seems like a pretty obvious indicator.', ">>{dagwood222} : Dude, we're almost 20 years into the war on terror, don't you think it's time to actually educate yourself about the enemy? 'Allahu akbar' was a part of Islam for hundreds of years before the war. It's like saying that everyone who uses a 'Rebel yell' wants to secede from the US.", '>>{west2night} : So you believe you know the case better than the parents, the police in France and Australia, and the court?', ">>{sookeysam} : >'Allahu akbar' was a part of Islam for hundreds of years before the war. So was [oppression](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jizya), [genocide](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamidian_massacres), [slavery](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_slave_trade#7th_century_to_20th_century) and [piracy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_pirates). No doubt using the same catchy slogan.", '>>{sookeysam} : What would the parents really know? As far as at least the French authorities, their track record with rooting out Islamist connections is far from stellar. The Aussie courts are still determining if he is fit to stand trial, but crazy and terrorist are not mutually exclusive categories.', '>>{dagwood222} : Genius! The American flag flew over slave plantations and internment camps, I guess that means every American thought those things were great!', '>>{RidleyScotch} : > > As far as at least the French authorities, their track record with rooting out Islamist connections is far from stellar. > i feel as if if that disqualifies french authorities then it sure as heck disqualifies american ones here too', ">>{sookeysam} : If the prepetrators consistently yelled 'Praise Jesus' every time they whipped a slave, shot a Native American, or threw a Japanese person in a camp - then I guess it would be comprable, but still less brutal. Cultural relativists need to give their head a shake.", '>>{sookeysam} : That is why extreme vetting procedures need to be developed, and why suspected terrorists (also their friends and families) need to be more aggressively investigated/monitored.', ">>{dagwood222} : Yes, every single Muslim is a terrorist. Which is why there are so many Muslims who have helped us in our fight. Because it's just a trick to get us to lower our guard.", ">>{sookeysam} : >Yes, every single Muslim is a terrorist. Never said that. This 'not all' non-argument is played out. I am saying that Smail Ayad pretty obviously is.", '>>{MacNCheezOnUrKneez} : > So was oppression, genocide, slavery and piracy. That could be said about every religion.', ">>{dagwood222} : I am saying that Smail Ayad pretty obviously is. Because you've spent more time studying the case then the victim's mother.", '>>{sookeysam} : Throughout the entire span of human history maybe. That being said, *some* religions have engaged in these practices (while exclaiming the greatness of their god) more recently and to a greater degree than others.', '>>{usernameson} : I think that the Australian authorities are insulting our intelligence and that of their people. We know the reason for this. They want there to be less panic among the population about receiving infinity muslim migrants. Too bad they think lying to their own people is a valid way of achieving this. If a man randomly starts killing people he is committing an attack. Shouting "Allah Ackbar" betrays his motive. To claim that this was not an islamic inspired attack is ludicrous. If someone wants to play semantics and say this is not terrorism because he wasn\'t in contact with a terorist organization, then fine. But it was an islamic inspired attack sothe result is the same: people being less comfortable letting muslims into their country or into their presence. The mother of the victim, sorry to say, is a nut. Her daughter was murdered by a muslim and she responded by gathering money for muslim refugees at her funeral. Now she is claiming that if the man wasn\'t praying 5 times a day then he wasn\'t a muslim. Right. Because so many non-muslims shout the islamic call to battle, "Allah Ackbar." I guess in her book you practically have to be an imam to have your behavior linked with islam. She is just delusional.', '>>{MacNCheezOnUrKneez} : > Because so many non-muslims shout the islamic call to battle, "Allah Ackbar." It\'s "Allahu Akbar" (الله أكبر) and it\'s not an "Islamic battle cry". It literally means "GOD IS GREAT" and Arab Christians, like myself, say it all the time as well. Contrary to popular belief, Muslims don\'t have a trademark on the word "Allah" it\'s been in use for thousands of years.'], [">>{Aarondo99} : When you sync, it'll tell you you have media on your phone, and ask if you want it moved to your laptop. And dude, take a chill pill.", ">>{EzzoMahfouz} : I pressed sync, it didn't ask me whether I wanted to copy or not but it said 'copying' in the progress bar above. I tried adding my music assuming it synced but to no avail. Did I misunderstand you?", '>>{cocobandicoot} : 1. Calm down. 2. The reason why this is happening is because iTunes doesn\'t have any way of knowing that this is the same computer you\'ve always had — the entire computer was erased as set up as a "new" computer, and so iTunes — along with any other software on your computer — is going to believe this is an entirely new PC. It\'s not a fault of iTunes, it\'s just the way of things. When you go to sync your music, you\'ll get that dreaded message that your iPhone\'s content will have to be erased and replaced with content on your "new" iTunes library. Rest assured that the only content that gets erased is your music, so no worries about losing any other information on your iPhone. As long as all the music that is on your iPhone is also in your iTunes library, then you shouldn\'t be losing anything then, right? While it might take a little time for it to remove everything / re-add it, it\'ll work and you\'ll be back up and running in no time. 3. Calm down.', ">>{EzzoMahfouz} : Sigh. I did have to re-download a few albums but what else am I gonna do... Obviously I'm frustrated because I couldn't have seen this coming a mile away. This is my first time owning an iPhone, and while I'm absolutely loving it, I've always been wary of the iOS ecosystem that many say is 'boxed in'. At least it's only the music that's getting deleted!", '>>{cocobandicoot} : > I\'ve always been wary of the iOS ecosystem that many say is \'boxed in\'. I can definitely understand some of your concerns. For the most part, you won\'t often run into issues with the "closed" ecosystem that iOS has — in fact, there can be many benefits to it, especially when it comes to being integrated with other Apple devices. That being said, the issue you experienced is certainly an annoying one. It\'s a holdover from many years ago (back when the iPod first came out). Although they don\'t really say why they have this system in place, the real reason is because, back when the iPod first came out, Apple had to play nice with all the big music companies / record labels at a time when piracy was a very big deal to them. As a result, Apple put this system in place so that if you had an iPod, you couldn\'t just stick all your music on it, and then run to a friends\' house and share all your thousands of songs onto their computer, and then their songs with yours, and so and so forth. So that\'s why when your computer saw that you iPhone was connected to "another" computer\'s iTunes library, it freaked out and said no. Rest assured that it\'s something you don\'t see much anymore, but as long as you still have all that same music in iTunes, you won\'t be heavily affected by it. Also, glad you\'re liking the iPhone so far!', ">>{crisss1205} : And that's why I always tell people to backup their devices.", ">>{Aarondo99} : That's weird. Usually comes up when I do it (constantly switching between a MacBook and an iMac).", ">>{thatmffm} : I'm glad to see you got this figured out, just wanted to throw some advice your way to mitigate future frustrations- Keep an iCloud backup of your data, and a Google Play backup of your music and you'll never have to worry about losing anything :)", '>>{EzzoMahfouz} : Thanks for the advice, I appreciate it! I downloaded iCloud for PC rn so I can start downloading my stuff.', ">>{thatmffm} : I don't know what you downloaded, but delete it and run a virus scan immediately lol.... seriously. iCloud backup is built into the phone. Go to Settings>iCloud."]]

classify and reply

['>>{taka06} : Incredibly disappointed in Pat Toomey, but not surprised.', ">>{dirtybirds2} : wow... we can say goodbye to any claim that we have the best school system in the world. An entire generation won't be taught to critically think for themselves (and thus keep voting Republicans into office).", '>>{dead_in_the_boot} : Can anyone help me and find the name of the account of my iPhone? I cannot unlock it on the AT&T portal otherwise', '>>{ozric101} : We never did.. The liberal have destroyed our Education system.', '>>{aBernsteinBear} : I think there is something to be said about the nominee that for the first time in history the VP had to step up and tiebreak a nominee. Especially since only recently you only need 51 votes instead of 60', '>>{failedentertainment} : I will find tears for this person who chose to support a violent racist ideology when Trump tells his backers to stop assaulting Muslims and Hispanic immigrants.', ">>{gee124} : It's probably your AT&T account? Try the unlock request with your account name.", ">>{perry1023} : Nope. You're SOL. Try trading it to someone on ATT that doesn't care and buy a legit factory unlocked iPhone. You learned a valuable lesson today.", '>>{jnr_77} : They aren\'t. Every ten minutes we find out that "student who claims she was attacked by Trump supporters lied to police." Face the truth. The only really violent people in this election have been the left. Just ask the Portland police.', ">>{DumpsterDon} : Yeah no kidding. Trump could try to sooth everyone, like a president should instead of calling the media unfair and the protesters paid shills. Oh wells. Also, that wasn't brutal. It was a hair pulling catfight. I'm not saying it's right.", '>>{ouroboro76} : Less educated people tend to vote Republican, so having a Secretary of Education that wishes to privatize education to every extent possible (thus harming the quality of public education) serves to further the goal of continuing to get Republicans elected.', ">>{GlaciersMoving} : After Pence cast the tie-breaker, they motioned to reconsider the vote. What does that mean? There was an obvious majority in the room to motion for reconsidering. Hopefully I'm understanding this.", '>>{thatsmemotto} : This is exactly what they want, seems like they are getting away with it too. =(', '>>{Vukomanovich} : > The liberal have destroyed our Education system. Except for the fact that the best schools are located in the most liberal states, and the worst schools are located deep in republican territory.', '>>{Vukomanovich} : Even if that were true, their schools are still much better than AL, AR, KY, LA, and MS.', ">>{turbofarts1} : this isn't news. who fucking gives a shit. edit: because every dipshit will come in here and rationalize why this is important, but the other violence isn't important, or there is more of this than that.... its all violence in the end, and it doesn't fucking matter if we know that Suzy cumstains was from Vallejo California, or if Fred Fartmeyer was from Boone county WV", ">>{portnux} : > It's not stolen because Ive been using it for years. I remember reading about a guy who drove a stolen corvette for over 30 years. It was still a stolen vette.", '>>{ozric101} : I wonder if demographics have anything to do with this? You should not make sweeping generalizations if you are unwilling to accept the conclusions that follow.', '>>{SMFD21} : No, because if the phone was stolen, it would have been blacklisted.', ">>{dead_in_the_boot} : I never joined AT&T I've been using H20, an AT&T reseller", '>>{1000000students} : Day 1 in Trump’s America medium dot com/@seanokane/day-1-in-trumps-america-9e4d58381001#.4pn6t5fx0', '>>{CountChoculahh} : It\'s perfectly acceptable to say that poor black and white kids have worse educational outcomes than middle class white and black students. There\'s an entire body of work devoted to this, it even has a term "Achievement Gap". Is that to say that demographics have any influence on ability, absolutely not. Do they have an impact on achievement? Certainly. This is compounded by a number of factors, but the biggest is perhaps the negative investments that have been made in poor communities which drives property value down and leads to lower funding, lower student to teacher ratios, and a less competitive market for qualified teachers. Let\'s talk about it.', '>>{Vukomanovich} : Who says I am unwilling to accept conclusions? If you have any evidence, feel free to share it. Making a baseless claim that CA has a combined IQ of 92 does not add any value to the conversation. I am not making sweeping generalizations, just pointing out the fact that there is a correlation between education systems and political affiliation. The worst educated states in the country consistently vote republican.', '>>{G00dHumor} : so you have recorded documents of every attack and can confirm that it was always the left? If only half the country was as smart as you :((', ">>{Dupree878} : That's why you can't unlock it. I've unlocked numerous phones I bought used, but I'd added them all to my account. Unless the original user called them to remove it (which who does that?) its still in the system on their account. Had you used it on your own account it would have transferred over then you could unlock it.", '>>{highsnturd} : Well, the next generation will be even dumber than your average Trump supporter. Sad!', '>>{gurase} : The first question on the unlock page is "Are you an AT&T customer?" Select "no" and then you only have to enter the IMEI and make/model. But, since the phone is currently active on your H2O account this might not work. You may have to try using a different phone on your account while you wait for them to unlock it.', ">>{wyteshadow} : Don't you dare post this on r/politics. By unwritten rule, you're only allowed to post negative articles about the president elect or his ignorant supporters. His literally ignorant supporters. This will probably be deleted by the mods and rightfully so. White people who vote for Trump cannot possibly be a victim of anything. They literally cant. Please take this down. /s", '>>{LettersInAlphabet} : No. You are okay with Racism and violence as long as it is done by the liberals.', '>>{PragProgLibertarian} : Take solace in the fact the position has very little power.', ">>{PragProgLibertarian} : But, the position doesn't have the power to privatize anything. It certainly doesn't have the budget for it.", ">>{dead_in_the_boot} : i can get passed that screen to the next. I then asked for first and last name and an email to contact you when the unlock is complete. However, each time I've tried it gives me the above noted message. I've tried my name as well as the name I thought was the last owner...", ">>{gurase} : Darn. I think you're out of luck until you activate a different phone on your line or port out using a different phone.", ">>{gaffeyManzZ} : Click the option that you're not an ATT customer and it should work", '>>{TwoToneTrump} : The media is unfair and they are spurring on these protests. Did not every left leaning media outlet just call a landslide for clinton and it was actually a reverse landslide by trump? Have you learned nothing?', '>>{jdayellow} : Think you should call the at&t customer service to get help', ">>{ouroboro76} : No. She's just gonna push that policy, and the states won't be getting the money to get the schools up to par. Step 1 of school vouchers at a federal level is probably to severely underfund public schools to whatever extent they can get away with, exacerbating the problem and making things worse for poorer children, then presenting vouchers as though they are a panacea.", ">>{PragProgLibertarian} : I get your point but, the DoED doesn't have the budget to fund very many vouchers. Public schools are primarily run locally with some state rules. They're primarily funded by local property taxes. Fortunately, the department, and the Secretary don't have very much power. Even Common Core is done by the states not, the federal government.", '>>{jnr_77} : Well here\'s the thing, when every article is posted in a frothing frenzy of "Someone was attacked by a Trump supporter!" and then an hour later they have to retract, it just becomes white noise. Only die hard lefties believe this Vox, HuffPo, pseudo-Gawker type bullshit anymore. I will tell you this, Trump could not have played this better. In all seriousness. When he launches his Trump Network News (and he will after he\'s out of office) he will package it up as "Look at how the lying untrustworthy biased media manipulates you!" In the age of Twitter and Reddit where people post a lot of absolute bullshit that turns out to be hysterical nonsense, Truth™ will be the most valuable commodity and Trump has already had 18 months of proof that the media simply cannot be trusted anymore. He is the total embodiment of the saying that "Luck is preparation meets opportunity." Roger Ailes is out, the media is demonstrably untrustworthy, and he will have a worldwide audience as a former US President. "The media is broken, folks. I\'m the only one that can fix it." Genius.', ">>{Uber-A} : It was not right for the attackers to do this, but I don't necessarily feel bad for the student. He supports two men who promote violence & hate and want to take away my rights, so I don't care.", '>>{TwoToneTrump} : Words = physical violence because people of color cant control themselves? Is that what you are saying? Violence should never be a response to words period. If you get so emotional over words you cant even enter into a debate and resort to violence you were raised wrong. By your logic men should be able to beat their wives when they say "Im leaving you" Because you cant treat humans that way.', ">>{veridique} : I don't consider losing the popular vote a landslide.", '>>{TwoToneTrump} : Electoral college is meant to be there so cities dont dominate the vote. Liberals demographics will never help them when they herd in cities. Electorally he crushed her.', '>>{veridique} : I see this posted here unlike r/the_donald where anything remotely negative about him is banned.', '>>{failedentertainment} : People of color have felt unsafe in America forever, and even more so today. The spate of hate crimes since Nov 8 has only compounded that. Trump supporters feel safe in their racism. No one chooses their race, people choose to support Trump.', '>>{AChieftain} : What the fuck? If the thought of physically assaulting someone for saying something that hurts your feelings even crosses your mind, you need to be locked away. That\'s actually fucking disgusting. "This is what happens" yes, speak your opinion, even though it may offend someone, and your consequences are being terribly beaten. Disgusting.', '>>{AChieftain} : Because when the left pushed bullshit like "white privilege" it will make for a lovely community. Screaming "institutionalized racism!" "wage gap!" and other bullshit like "We\'re held down!" will make people dislike others, it\'s not surprise. So no, that\'s not what Trump brought to America. Both sides are guilty. There\'s racism on both sides whether you realize it or not.', ">>{wyteshadow} : If I ventured over to r/hillaryclinton and posted an article bashing her, the same exact thing would happen. r/politics should be neutral but it's far from it. It might as well be r/liberals_r_us due to the extreme bias and lack of neutrality. So your point is irrelevant.", ">>{wyteshadow} : I don't care about your personal rights so I wouldn't necessarily feel bad if you lost them.", '>>{AChieftain} : White privilege gets thrown around far too much, it\'s not really a problem. I\'ve never seen much, if nay, hard evidence supporting the ideas behind white privilege and institutionalized racism. I do think racism is bad, but I don\'t think our country is a racist one in policy. While Trump has probably incited more fear and worrying, the left is responsible for a lot of the "fear" he tries to inflict when they ignore radical muslims and pretend they do not exist. The federal government, for example, would release tapes of terrorists talking and every mention of "Islam" or "Allah" would be beeped out. Can\'t really deal with an issue when one side wants to completely ignore that religious extremists exist and they\'re not all just batshit crazy.', ">>{LettersInAlphabet} : For the last time most trump supporters are NOT racist. The liberals are always great at being the biggest hypocrites ever. Isn't calling all white republicans racist massively racist and discriminatory itself?", ">>{ccdrAke} : Nobody cares about your opinion. Trump won and is our president, and people get abused on the daily for supporting OUR PRESIDENT. And you support that? You're disgusting, and looking at all your comments, your a pathetic low life. Hillary Clinton supporters need to be locked up just like her ugly self."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{taka06} : Incredibly disappointed in Pat Toomey, but not surprised.', ">>{dirtybirds2} : wow... we can say goodbye to any claim that we have the best school system in the world. An entire generation won't be taught to critically think for themselves (and thus keep voting Republicans into office).", '>>{ozric101} : We never did.. The liberal have destroyed our Education system.', '>>{aBernsteinBear} : I think there is something to be said about the nominee that for the first time in history the VP had to step up and tiebreak a nominee. Especially since only recently you only need 51 votes instead of 60', '>>{ouroboro76} : Less educated people tend to vote Republican, so having a Secretary of Education that wishes to privatize education to every extent possible (thus harming the quality of public education) serves to further the goal of continuing to get Republicans elected.', ">>{GlaciersMoving} : After Pence cast the tie-breaker, they motioned to reconsider the vote. What does that mean? There was an obvious majority in the room to motion for reconsidering. Hopefully I'm understanding this.", '>>{thatsmemotto} : This is exactly what they want, seems like they are getting away with it too. =(', '>>{Vukomanovich} : > The liberal have destroyed our Education system. Except for the fact that the best schools are located in the most liberal states, and the worst schools are located deep in republican territory.', '>>{Vukomanovich} : Even if that were true, their schools are still much better than AL, AR, KY, LA, and MS.', '>>{ozric101} : I wonder if demographics have anything to do with this? You should not make sweeping generalizations if you are unwilling to accept the conclusions that follow.', '>>{CountChoculahh} : It\'s perfectly acceptable to say that poor black and white kids have worse educational outcomes than middle class white and black students. There\'s an entire body of work devoted to this, it even has a term "Achievement Gap". Is that to say that demographics have any influence on ability, absolutely not. Do they have an impact on achievement? Certainly. This is compounded by a number of factors, but the biggest is perhaps the negative investments that have been made in poor communities which drives property value down and leads to lower funding, lower student to teacher ratios, and a less competitive market for qualified teachers. Let\'s talk about it.', '>>{Vukomanovich} : Who says I am unwilling to accept conclusions? If you have any evidence, feel free to share it. Making a baseless claim that CA has a combined IQ of 92 does not add any value to the conversation. I am not making sweeping generalizations, just pointing out the fact that there is a correlation between education systems and political affiliation. The worst educated states in the country consistently vote republican.', '>>{highsnturd} : Well, the next generation will be even dumber than your average Trump supporter. Sad!', '>>{PragProgLibertarian} : Take solace in the fact the position has very little power.', ">>{PragProgLibertarian} : But, the position doesn't have the power to privatize anything. It certainly doesn't have the budget for it.", ">>{ouroboro76} : No. She's just gonna push that policy, and the states won't be getting the money to get the schools up to par. Step 1 of school vouchers at a federal level is probably to severely underfund public schools to whatever extent they can get away with, exacerbating the problem and making things worse for poorer children, then presenting vouchers as though they are a panacea.", ">>{PragProgLibertarian} : I get your point but, the DoED doesn't have the budget to fund very many vouchers. Public schools are primarily run locally with some state rules. They're primarily funded by local property taxes. Fortunately, the department, and the Secretary don't have very much power. Even Common Core is done by the states not, the federal government."], ['>>{dead_in_the_boot} : Can anyone help me and find the name of the account of my iPhone? I cannot unlock it on the AT&T portal otherwise', ">>{gee124} : It's probably your AT&T account? Try the unlock request with your account name.", ">>{perry1023} : Nope. You're SOL. Try trading it to someone on ATT that doesn't care and buy a legit factory unlocked iPhone. You learned a valuable lesson today.", ">>{portnux} : > It's not stolen because Ive been using it for years. I remember reading about a guy who drove a stolen corvette for over 30 years. It was still a stolen vette.", '>>{SMFD21} : No, because if the phone was stolen, it would have been blacklisted.', ">>{dead_in_the_boot} : I never joined AT&T I've been using H20, an AT&T reseller", ">>{Dupree878} : That's why you can't unlock it. I've unlocked numerous phones I bought used, but I'd added them all to my account. Unless the original user called them to remove it (which who does that?) its still in the system on their account. Had you used it on your own account it would have transferred over then you could unlock it.", '>>{gurase} : The first question on the unlock page is "Are you an AT&T customer?" Select "no" and then you only have to enter the IMEI and make/model. But, since the phone is currently active on your H2O account this might not work. You may have to try using a different phone on your account while you wait for them to unlock it.', ">>{dead_in_the_boot} : i can get passed that screen to the next. I then asked for first and last name and an email to contact you when the unlock is complete. However, each time I've tried it gives me the above noted message. I've tried my name as well as the name I thought was the last owner...", ">>{gurase} : Darn. I think you're out of luck until you activate a different phone on your line or port out using a different phone.", ">>{gaffeyManzZ} : Click the option that you're not an ATT customer and it should work", '>>{jdayellow} : Think you should call the at&t customer service to get help'], ['>>{failedentertainment} : I will find tears for this person who chose to support a violent racist ideology when Trump tells his backers to stop assaulting Muslims and Hispanic immigrants.', '>>{jnr_77} : They aren\'t. Every ten minutes we find out that "student who claims she was attacked by Trump supporters lied to police." Face the truth. The only really violent people in this election have been the left. Just ask the Portland police.', ">>{DumpsterDon} : Yeah no kidding. Trump could try to sooth everyone, like a president should instead of calling the media unfair and the protesters paid shills. Oh wells. Also, that wasn't brutal. It was a hair pulling catfight. I'm not saying it's right.", ">>{turbofarts1} : this isn't news. who fucking gives a shit. edit: because every dipshit will come in here and rationalize why this is important, but the other violence isn't important, or there is more of this than that.... its all violence in the end, and it doesn't fucking matter if we know that Suzy cumstains was from Vallejo California, or if Fred Fartmeyer was from Boone county WV", '>>{1000000students} : Day 1 in Trump’s America medium dot com/@seanokane/day-1-in-trumps-america-9e4d58381001#.4pn6t5fx0', '>>{G00dHumor} : so you have recorded documents of every attack and can confirm that it was always the left? If only half the country was as smart as you :((', ">>{wyteshadow} : Don't you dare post this on r/politics. By unwritten rule, you're only allowed to post negative articles about the president elect or his ignorant supporters. His literally ignorant supporters. This will probably be deleted by the mods and rightfully so. White people who vote for Trump cannot possibly be a victim of anything. They literally cant. Please take this down. /s", '>>{LettersInAlphabet} : No. You are okay with Racism and violence as long as it is done by the liberals.', '>>{TwoToneTrump} : The media is unfair and they are spurring on these protests. Did not every left leaning media outlet just call a landslide for clinton and it was actually a reverse landslide by trump? Have you learned nothing?', '>>{jnr_77} : Well here\'s the thing, when every article is posted in a frothing frenzy of "Someone was attacked by a Trump supporter!" and then an hour later they have to retract, it just becomes white noise. Only die hard lefties believe this Vox, HuffPo, pseudo-Gawker type bullshit anymore. I will tell you this, Trump could not have played this better. In all seriousness. When he launches his Trump Network News (and he will after he\'s out of office) he will package it up as "Look at how the lying untrustworthy biased media manipulates you!" In the age of Twitter and Reddit where people post a lot of absolute bullshit that turns out to be hysterical nonsense, Truth™ will be the most valuable commodity and Trump has already had 18 months of proof that the media simply cannot be trusted anymore. He is the total embodiment of the saying that "Luck is preparation meets opportunity." Roger Ailes is out, the media is demonstrably untrustworthy, and he will have a worldwide audience as a former US President. "The media is broken, folks. I\'m the only one that can fix it." Genius.', ">>{Uber-A} : It was not right for the attackers to do this, but I don't necessarily feel bad for the student. He supports two men who promote violence & hate and want to take away my rights, so I don't care.", '>>{TwoToneTrump} : Words = physical violence because people of color cant control themselves? Is that what you are saying? Violence should never be a response to words period. If you get so emotional over words you cant even enter into a debate and resort to violence you were raised wrong. By your logic men should be able to beat their wives when they say "Im leaving you" Because you cant treat humans that way.', ">>{veridique} : I don't consider losing the popular vote a landslide.", '>>{TwoToneTrump} : Electoral college is meant to be there so cities dont dominate the vote. Liberals demographics will never help them when they herd in cities. Electorally he crushed her.', '>>{veridique} : I see this posted here unlike r/the_donald where anything remotely negative about him is banned.', '>>{failedentertainment} : People of color have felt unsafe in America forever, and even more so today. The spate of hate crimes since Nov 8 has only compounded that. Trump supporters feel safe in their racism. No one chooses their race, people choose to support Trump.', '>>{AChieftain} : What the fuck? If the thought of physically assaulting someone for saying something that hurts your feelings even crosses your mind, you need to be locked away. That\'s actually fucking disgusting. "This is what happens" yes, speak your opinion, even though it may offend someone, and your consequences are being terribly beaten. Disgusting.', '>>{AChieftain} : Because when the left pushed bullshit like "white privilege" it will make for a lovely community. Screaming "institutionalized racism!" "wage gap!" and other bullshit like "We\'re held down!" will make people dislike others, it\'s not surprise. So no, that\'s not what Trump brought to America. Both sides are guilty. There\'s racism on both sides whether you realize it or not.', ">>{wyteshadow} : If I ventured over to r/hillaryclinton and posted an article bashing her, the same exact thing would happen. r/politics should be neutral but it's far from it. It might as well be r/liberals_r_us due to the extreme bias and lack of neutrality. So your point is irrelevant.", ">>{wyteshadow} : I don't care about your personal rights so I wouldn't necessarily feel bad if you lost them.", '>>{AChieftain} : White privilege gets thrown around far too much, it\'s not really a problem. I\'ve never seen much, if nay, hard evidence supporting the ideas behind white privilege and institutionalized racism. I do think racism is bad, but I don\'t think our country is a racist one in policy. While Trump has probably incited more fear and worrying, the left is responsible for a lot of the "fear" he tries to inflict when they ignore radical muslims and pretend they do not exist. The federal government, for example, would release tapes of terrorists talking and every mention of "Islam" or "Allah" would be beeped out. Can\'t really deal with an issue when one side wants to completely ignore that religious extremists exist and they\'re not all just batshit crazy.', ">>{LettersInAlphabet} : For the last time most trump supporters are NOT racist. The liberals are always great at being the biggest hypocrites ever. Isn't calling all white republicans racist massively racist and discriminatory itself?", ">>{ccdrAke} : Nobody cares about your opinion. Trump won and is our president, and people get abused on the daily for supporting OUR PRESIDENT. And you support that? You're disgusting, and looking at all your comments, your a pathetic low life. Hillary Clinton supporters need to be locked up just like her ugly self."]]

classify and reply

['>>{gooork} : One thing that has always annoyed me with most phones is the slippery materials they use. Sure they look great in aluminium, but fuck me if I try to use it without a case. What I love about Blackberry is the confidence you get when holding them. Nice grippy materials.', '>>{NotJimIrsay} : Looks like any other smartphone (generally speaking). Nothing special about the hardware.', '>>{harispk1} : Chelsea Clinton political future sparks media excitement, despite denials', ">>{NoTiredOfWinning} : She is too dumb to win a national election. She might win a liberal state, because.....they'll elect anyone", ">>{Fuzzyjammer} : Exactly. Why would they ever do it? A little BB software Android customization alone won't do it. BBOS10 had some nice touches, appealing to some. Android-powered PRIV, while imperfect and overpriced, had its major selling point - the physical keyboard, which made hundreds of users (inc. me) happy. And this is just another low-mid-range Android smartphone. Software updates, really? Tell this to AT&T PRIV users.", '>>{Gustacho} : President Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau hold a joint news conference at the White House.', ">>{wraithtek} : Why does it seem like conservative media is the only one pushing the narrative that Chelsea's going to run for office, or Hillary's going to run for mayor, or for President again? It's a puzzler. /s", '>>{Tenacious_Ceeee} : Canadian Press is going to ask some tough questions.', '>>{conanthecnidarian} : The right wing lunatics in this country would be completely lost without a Clinton to attack.', '>>{dperls} : Ah, thank god he mentioned his electoral college victory again.', ">>{onewonyuan} : He doesn't have the stamina to be president. SAD!", '>>{RationalLies} : Too little too late for Blackberry. This is what happens to a company whose management screams "stay the course" while the world changes around it. It\'s painfully clear because of the past corporate appeal of Blackberry products, the board at Blackberry is not at all in tune with *technology*, they are in tune with *business*. This is a problem however when your business *is* technology. This underwhelming Alcatel phone with BB branding and mild Blackberry OS flavors overlaid on Android should have been released in 2011 when Blackberry actually had a respectable market share and chance at life. The *only* thing this phone achieves is so they have something to show investors, "look! We\'ve adapted! We\'re committed to an android phone! This is where the trend is going!" and they can survive a couple more months of awkward board meetings. Well congratulations Blackberry, you\'ve done what you\'ve should\'ve done 5 or 6 years ago, which is an *eternity* in the tech industry. Die slow you disconnected fucks, no one will miss you.', '>>{JPN2214} : Strangely though, this rhetoric has been spewed for the past like 5 years too. Yet Blackberry are still afloat. Maybe they have a grand plan that does work.', ">>{mydoghasocd} : jesus christ. I love the Clintons as much as the next person but the voting public is seriously clinton-ed out. Can't we have at least a decade or so of a break? maybe she can be senator somewhere for 30 years, until the memory of the horrific election of 2016 fades a little bit.", ">>{osaucyone} : Trump's a fucking idiot and he won a national election (although by a technicality).", '>>{madam1} : An Iowa congressman has proposed legislation that would block Harriet Tubman from replacing President Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill.', ">>{e_t_} : Because that's the kind of thing Congress should be spending its time on, not silly things like passing a budget.", ">>{JAG12} : King's reason for introducing the amendment was not immediately clear. Yes CNN, yes it is... blatantly clear.", '>>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : Trudeau is wiping the floor with his far superior oral skills, banging it with bilingual comments, being relaxed, casual, nice speech and Trump just stands there stiff and monotone in his comments in his opening speech. Edit: Trudeau mentions Winston Churchill and all of a sudden Trump is like "oh? Something I like?"... LOL OMG I feel like this is just one giant diplomatic Trolling session...', '>>{NoTiredOfWinning} : She thought Abraham Lincoln actually wore a MAGA hat. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/dumb-brick-chelsea-clinton-wonders-lincoln-maga-hat-photoshopped/', ">>{gamjar} : Oh my god. He is so terrible at answering questions. It's like that SC beauty queen answer every damn time. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww", '>>{CarmineFields} : She denies running. This has nothing to do with her actual goals. This is a right-wing wet dream of having a legit reason to drag another Clinton through their smear machine.', ">>{RationalLies} : I would like to believe that, honestly I would. But the fact remains, and anything RIM does now is just to slow the burn, retain any market value they can for when their investors inevitably come cashing in, and try to stay relevant enough to be bought by someone, most likely Microsoft. Rome didn't fall overnight. Neither do fortune 500 companies. The smartphone market is already crowded, and RIM is damaged goods. Like I said, if they had adopted Android 6 years ago, partnered with Microsoft, or provided a favorable marketplace for app devs to want to develop for them, they would be in a decent place right now with a nice little market share carved out in the corporate world still. The fact is, there is too much ground to make up now. Their execs can probably see this now, but again, it's too late. Shoulda woulda coulda.", ">>{CarmineFields} : I'm sure you know her personally and can accurately vouch for her intelligence... Meanwhile President Bigly continues to learn government is complicated.", '>>{spqrPh} : This is fucking unbelievable :D:D:D he really did, completely dodged the question and talked about how popular he is this is just insane also Trudeaus speech, the contrast is soooo harsh :D just insane', ">>{GotMoFans} : After seeing her speech at the DNC, she's more Hill than Bill. Therefore any political aspirations are unlikely to lead to much.", ">>{njstore} : And he is wearing his Metamucil bronzer today. Et il porte son bronzer Metamucil aujourd'hui.", ">>{greyhunter4} : Harriet Tubman is great and all but can they stop fucking with out money? If its to stop counterfeits then fine but other than that I'd like to know what the real thing looks like. We use credit cards for almost everything so when they change the bills its a little weird.", '>>{Allyn1} : TIL some people would get really confused seeing a Black woman on a dollar bill and come to the conclusion that it isn\'t "the real thing."', ">>{JPN2214} : But it's strange... I don't see these signs. They keep on releasing new products, they do or don't sell, and they don't care and move on. They have enough money right now to be a major sponsor to the Mercedes Formula 1 racing team, something that isn't chum change.", '>>{BreakingClean} : Does anyone have any information that can elaborate on their talks of energy infrastructure jobs that relate to minding the environment? Trudeau mentioned this but nothing more has been said about it.', ">>{pizzashill} : The interesting part here isn't the fact that this wouldn't make someone dumb, really, it's that how you thought she was actually being serious because the right wing hate machine told you she was. Did you even read the other tweets? https://heatst.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/clintonsarcasm.png?w=619 As for your claim dumb people can't win national elections, I'll leave you with this: http://naturalgasnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/trumpandflag.png", ">>{RationalLies} : Well, they *don't* sell. Again, they have enough capital to stay afloat for a few years, but they are putting out a forest fire with a cup of water. It's just a matter of time. They have zero market share now, and after 6 years of twiddling their thumbs and slapping BB logos on oem unimpressive hardware, they have gained zero traction. I don't want them to fail necessarily, but it's inevitable. They will be bought out and someone else will try to save the name, but it's going to be an uphill battle after the hole they've dug.", ">>{JPN2214} : You say this, and I would agree with you, I'm just pointing out that my observations all point otherwise. Twiddling your thumbs and failing usually leads to company death rather quickly in the tech world, at most a few years, yet here we are, 6 years later, with them still alive and well. A floundering company then shouldn't go on to sponsor one of the most expensive motorsports in the world for multiple years straight.", ">>{greyhunter4} : Well we'd have 3+ variations of the $20 bill floating around and all banks money counters would have to be updated... You know what, fuck it. This isn't worth arguing over. Be a dick all you want.", ">>{smurfsm00} : The reprehensibly bigoted GOP superstar-wannabe Steve King strikes again. Proud that I stood up to him a decade ago when he wanted to block our adding 'sexual orientation' to the list of protected groups pertaining to employment non-discrimination laws in my hometown of in Iowa. Though I no longer live in his district I am very aware of his character and the nature of his political ambitions. Illuminating quote of his in this article: “This was a divisive proposal on the part of the president,” he said in an interview Tuesday. “Mine is unifying. It just says, don’t change anything. We were happy.” - What a prick.", ">>{scotscott} : Blackberry's touchscreen phone But what about the storm? Or the z10? Or the passport? Or the PRIV? Or the like eighty other ones? In other news, my PRIV is truly superb. I'll probably honestly keep it for another five years if they don't end up making a second gen.", ">>{Roseking} : Like for Christ's sakes. None of the Clinton's have ever been shown to be dumb. She has multiple Masters and a PhD. The fact that fucking news articles were written about this bullshit is why this country is on a downward spiral.", '>>{archeominus} : The guy is a Trump supporter. Is that surprising?', '>>{LucienLibrarian} : Do you expect their platform to involve actually coming up with policies that improve our country for its citizens?', '>>{bassististist} : Something to talk about while the Republican President fights impeachment.', '>>{jg_y3} : They did, they just got the usual political answers.', ">>{Plisskens_snake} : I don't think those machines work the way you think they do.", ">>{10390} : Every minute spent talking about Clinton or the DNC is a win for Trump who's hoping to use up all the oxygen so we can't talk about Russia.", '>>{ArcticISAF} : Nobody would believe that shit. But I guess you did.', '>>{-LiterallyHitler} : Who cares. This whole thing seems like race bait just meant to stir up trouble.', ">>{Zoophagous} : Down vote because fox news. The only places reporting on Chelsea Clinton are in the right wing media bubble. They are obsessed with the Clintons. No, democrats are not pining for a Clinton dynasty. No, we will not sob big liberal tears if Chelsea Clinton doesn't move into politics. And I would hope that as a group democrats see the neopotism rampant in Trump's WH and realize that America isn't a monarchy.", ">>{pizzashill} : There really does seem to be some serious, irrational hatred of the Clintons, even on the left side of the spectrum. Like yeah, I get that people don't like her - but you can't argue she's a dumb person, or isn't competent. This all started back when she pushed single payer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fO3yqUwOWH4 The woman has been dealing with this shit for over 20 years. All of her accomplishments are hand-waved and it's claimed the only thing she ever did was marry Bill.", '>>{TribeOnAQuest} : He didnt answer the question on NAFTA on how it relates to canada...', ">>{Daotar} : They've always changed the money. Why should they stop now? Do you want to go back to the money they used 200 years ago, or do you just want everything to be the way it was when you grew up?", ">>{spiffy_name} : I just want to point out he brought up his electoral college win to a question concerning Syrian refugees. He's disgusting.", ">>{mr-fiend} : To be fair, I don't think he answered any question..", ">>{ok_heh} : It must have taken every ounce of Trump's self control, of which there is about .001 ounces, not to do his handshake jack-off power move to Trudeau. He's actually learning not to do something dumb. Or Bannon sprayed his hands with pet corrector spray before the meeting.", ">>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : Trudeau well regarded, groomed, so much better looking than Trump ever was in his hey day, well spoken, highly regarded, has swagger, took control of the hand shake...and now totally out performed him with the joint conference opening comments. Trump just comes off so stiff, miserable, monotone. Wonder how it will go with Netanyahu later this week. This is like a comparison of a good leader versus an amature. Trump is also holding on to his lectern as if he's going to choke it. I'm absolutely enjoying this! Though are there that many french speaking Canadians to warrant the switching from English to French so often? Edit to add: Thanks for all the comments to elaborate how Canada is bilingual. That was just fantastic and learned something new! Thank you for letting us borrow your PM and remind us of what great leaders do and how to behave. :)", '>>{aubonpaine} : **Trump is a mess.** ###Trump is a disgrace. #Trump is a total disaster. \\*air horn*', ">>{ajustin2change} : This presidency has become so ridiculous I'm now waiting 15 minutes to watch this garbage LIVE?! I truly wish I could go back to not giving a fuck and having peace of mind, but damn this shit scary. I'm calling my representative 10 times a fucking day now.", ">>{Nautigirl} : We have a whole province that is French, and federal laws about bilingualism. Trudeau represents a Montreal riding. Many Canadians are bilingual (I could understand what he was saying in French, even if I can't speak it well).", ">>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : I think Trudeau simply was prepared for it and perfectly aligned himself to handle the situation and also used his youthful strength and charms to just stop that shit in it's tracks against the giant army pulling orange ogre.", '>>{the_mikepence} : On the French thing, pretty sure Canada does governmental business in both English and French.', '>>{Oreopenguin} : We are officially bilingual so almost everything the government does, including speeches etc is delivered in both official languages.', '>>{arthurpaliden} : Yes there are and it is also excellent gamesmanship. It is what separates the amateurs from the professionals.', ">>{Nautigirl} : I'd almost forgotten. And does Trump think we don't get American news in Canada!", '>>{vulturetrainer} : I feel like this really demonstrates how Canada is moving forward into the future while America wants to return to the dark ages.', ">>{frozenyogurttheif} : Quebec is 1/4 of the country's population. Now not all Quebecois have French as their first language, but there are French populations outside of Quebec as well. Canada has two official languages. The use of both languages regularly at a federal level is normal.", '>>{trollme_a_river} : Trump looks like a fat bag of gas next to Trudeau.', '>>{thenumber4xx} : Trudeau schooled Trump on every answer. Even though its not a debate, the journos really tried getting them to debate their opposite stances on refugees. Trudeau was so Canadian (nice) not to take more jabs at Trumps bigoted policies.', ">>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : That's pretty cool! I didn't know.. that was just pretty awesome.", ">>{PetticoatRule} : While there are many, it's really not about numbers. Two official languages = speaking in both languages. French is officially recognized in Canada and so it deserves to be treated equally. As an independent country it began as a merger between Upper and Lower Canada, modern day Ontario (mostly English) and Quebec (mostly French). Basically, it's the right thing to do regardless of the population numbers, though it's not insignificant anyway with 20% of Canadians having French as their first language.", ">>{Nautigirl} : Trudeau's election was far more of a landslide than Trump's. Trump should shut up about that when standing next to Trudeau.", '>>{alcabazar} : [About 22% by mother tongue](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_language_in_Canada) so 2 out of every 10 words should be French.', '>>{BunnyKick} : > Though are there that many french speaking Canadians to warrant the switching from English to French so often? Yeah, like, 7 or 8 million? Which is pretty significant in a country with a total population of 35 million... Not to mention, both english and french are our Official languages and thus official statements given by our PM should reflect that.', ">>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : I knew about areas being French speaking of Canada, I didn't know that doing so was a formal format. I understand what you mean about being able to 'hear' French as I'm that way with Spanish.", '>>{Nautigirl} : I wonder if he practiced? For some reason, I imagine Trudeau and Gerald Butts spending all weekend perfecting his handshake and reviewing videos. LOL', ">>{frozenyogurttheif} : The Liberal Trudeau government supports Keystone XL, so I'd expect that to move forward at some point if it's still financially viable at this point in time. The oil market has changed somewhat over the past few years.", '>>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : Wow, this makes the whole "Speak only \'murican" even that much more embarrassing for us.', '>>{alongy} : He attempted it on the first handshake, Trudeau was prepared for it with his posture/technique.', '>>{sleazus_christ} : the white house, or the "very famous white house"?', '>>{Tenacious_Ceeee} : 1/4 of the population is French and Trudeau needs those 30 second soundbites for the evening news.', '>>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : LOL "Come at me bro!" extending hand... "have at it, see if you can yank me now, bitch!"', ">>{njstore} : I can now see all the other countries coming to piss all over trump, instead of taking a pass. Gleefully. In multiple languages. Also, trump did not yank Trudeau's arm when shaking his hand. At least not yet, the day is still young.", ">>{gamjar} : Trump called on two pansy ass American reporters. One from the Daily caller and one from local news show. Both asked softball questions on 'security'. Willing to bet the other 95% of the journalists in that room wanted to ask about Flynn.", '>>{arthurpaliden} : I see Mr. Trudeau both took and answered questions is both English and French. This is to be expected as Canada is a legally bilingual country. In addition in this context it is also an excellent example of gamesmanship. You know the skill that separates the amateurs from the professionals in the political arena.', '>>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : Is it wrong if I look up one of those French sound bites just because Trudeau speaking french makes me feel tingly?', '>>{BunnyKick} : He also threw in a "tremendous" right there at the end. I bet it was totally on purpose, "speaking in Trump\'s language" will make Trump happy ("see, all the most well spoken and classy people say \'tremendous\'!"). Trump will be so pleased with this that he\'ll completely forget Trudeau just dissed on his muslim ban. Heh, diplomacy.', ">>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : I missed that (I'm at work).. that's just golden!", '>>{BunnyKick} : From what I understand, the USA doesn\'t actually *have* an "Official Language."', ">>{bmcgee} : > trump did not yank Trudeau's arm when shaking his hand Trudeau did not let Trump execute that weird handshake thing of his.", ">>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : No, we don't. I think it's been proposed, but never enacted.", ">>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : I'll google that tonight when I'm at home. :)", '>>{njstore} : Yeah, I just saw that. So great!', ">>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : Thanks! Took a glimpse, this is fascinating to me! Oh wait, it's been dubbed over with the translation. I found this right quick: https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5tuxun/president_trump_and_canadian_prime_minister/ddpa3up/?context=3 It was the switching flawlessly from one language to another that I wanted to see. That's just, delicious.", ">>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : Me too! I'm having such a crush on Canada right now!", ">>{TurtleStrangulation} : Yeah, and it's important to point out that there isn't a primary or secondary official language. Both languages have exactly the same status on the federal level."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{harispk1} : Chelsea Clinton political future sparks media excitement, despite denials', ">>{NoTiredOfWinning} : She is too dumb to win a national election. She might win a liberal state, because.....they'll elect anyone", ">>{wraithtek} : Why does it seem like conservative media is the only one pushing the narrative that Chelsea's going to run for office, or Hillary's going to run for mayor, or for President again? It's a puzzler. /s", '>>{conanthecnidarian} : The right wing lunatics in this country would be completely lost without a Clinton to attack.', ">>{mydoghasocd} : jesus christ. I love the Clintons as much as the next person but the voting public is seriously clinton-ed out. Can't we have at least a decade or so of a break? maybe she can be senator somewhere for 30 years, until the memory of the horrific election of 2016 fades a little bit.", ">>{osaucyone} : Trump's a fucking idiot and he won a national election (although by a technicality).", '>>{NoTiredOfWinning} : She thought Abraham Lincoln actually wore a MAGA hat. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/dumb-brick-chelsea-clinton-wonders-lincoln-maga-hat-photoshopped/', '>>{CarmineFields} : She denies running. This has nothing to do with her actual goals. This is a right-wing wet dream of having a legit reason to drag another Clinton through their smear machine.', ">>{CarmineFields} : I'm sure you know her personally and can accurately vouch for her intelligence... Meanwhile President Bigly continues to learn government is complicated.", ">>{GotMoFans} : After seeing her speech at the DNC, she's more Hill than Bill. Therefore any political aspirations are unlikely to lead to much.", ">>{pizzashill} : The interesting part here isn't the fact that this wouldn't make someone dumb, really, it's that how you thought she was actually being serious because the right wing hate machine told you she was. Did you even read the other tweets? https://heatst.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/clintonsarcasm.png?w=619 As for your claim dumb people can't win national elections, I'll leave you with this: http://naturalgasnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/trumpandflag.png", ">>{Roseking} : Like for Christ's sakes. None of the Clinton's have ever been shown to be dumb. She has multiple Masters and a PhD. The fact that fucking news articles were written about this bullshit is why this country is on a downward spiral.", '>>{LucienLibrarian} : Do you expect their platform to involve actually coming up with policies that improve our country for its citizens?', '>>{bassististist} : Something to talk about while the Republican President fights impeachment.', ">>{10390} : Every minute spent talking about Clinton or the DNC is a win for Trump who's hoping to use up all the oxygen so we can't talk about Russia.", '>>{ArcticISAF} : Nobody would believe that shit. But I guess you did.', ">>{Zoophagous} : Down vote because fox news. The only places reporting on Chelsea Clinton are in the right wing media bubble. They are obsessed with the Clintons. No, democrats are not pining for a Clinton dynasty. No, we will not sob big liberal tears if Chelsea Clinton doesn't move into politics. And I would hope that as a group democrats see the neopotism rampant in Trump's WH and realize that America isn't a monarchy.", ">>{pizzashill} : There really does seem to be some serious, irrational hatred of the Clintons, even on the left side of the spectrum. Like yeah, I get that people don't like her - but you can't argue she's a dumb person, or isn't competent. This all started back when she pushed single payer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fO3yqUwOWH4 The woman has been dealing with this shit for over 20 years. All of her accomplishments are hand-waved and it's claimed the only thing she ever did was marry Bill."], ['>>{gooork} : One thing that has always annoyed me with most phones is the slippery materials they use. Sure they look great in aluminium, but fuck me if I try to use it without a case. What I love about Blackberry is the confidence you get when holding them. Nice grippy materials.', '>>{NotJimIrsay} : Looks like any other smartphone (generally speaking). Nothing special about the hardware.', ">>{Fuzzyjammer} : Exactly. Why would they ever do it? A little BB software Android customization alone won't do it. BBOS10 had some nice touches, appealing to some. Android-powered PRIV, while imperfect and overpriced, had its major selling point - the physical keyboard, which made hundreds of users (inc. me) happy. And this is just another low-mid-range Android smartphone. Software updates, really? Tell this to AT&T PRIV users.", '>>{RationalLies} : Too little too late for Blackberry. This is what happens to a company whose management screams "stay the course" while the world changes around it. It\'s painfully clear because of the past corporate appeal of Blackberry products, the board at Blackberry is not at all in tune with *technology*, they are in tune with *business*. This is a problem however when your business *is* technology. This underwhelming Alcatel phone with BB branding and mild Blackberry OS flavors overlaid on Android should have been released in 2011 when Blackberry actually had a respectable market share and chance at life. The *only* thing this phone achieves is so they have something to show investors, "look! We\'ve adapted! We\'re committed to an android phone! This is where the trend is going!" and they can survive a couple more months of awkward board meetings. Well congratulations Blackberry, you\'ve done what you\'ve should\'ve done 5 or 6 years ago, which is an *eternity* in the tech industry. Die slow you disconnected fucks, no one will miss you.', '>>{JPN2214} : Strangely though, this rhetoric has been spewed for the past like 5 years too. Yet Blackberry are still afloat. Maybe they have a grand plan that does work.', ">>{RationalLies} : I would like to believe that, honestly I would. But the fact remains, and anything RIM does now is just to slow the burn, retain any market value they can for when their investors inevitably come cashing in, and try to stay relevant enough to be bought by someone, most likely Microsoft. Rome didn't fall overnight. Neither do fortune 500 companies. The smartphone market is already crowded, and RIM is damaged goods. Like I said, if they had adopted Android 6 years ago, partnered with Microsoft, or provided a favorable marketplace for app devs to want to develop for them, they would be in a decent place right now with a nice little market share carved out in the corporate world still. The fact is, there is too much ground to make up now. Their execs can probably see this now, but again, it's too late. Shoulda woulda coulda.", ">>{JPN2214} : But it's strange... I don't see these signs. They keep on releasing new products, they do or don't sell, and they don't care and move on. They have enough money right now to be a major sponsor to the Mercedes Formula 1 racing team, something that isn't chum change.", ">>{RationalLies} : Well, they *don't* sell. Again, they have enough capital to stay afloat for a few years, but they are putting out a forest fire with a cup of water. It's just a matter of time. They have zero market share now, and after 6 years of twiddling their thumbs and slapping BB logos on oem unimpressive hardware, they have gained zero traction. I don't want them to fail necessarily, but it's inevitable. They will be bought out and someone else will try to save the name, but it's going to be an uphill battle after the hole they've dug.", ">>{JPN2214} : You say this, and I would agree with you, I'm just pointing out that my observations all point otherwise. Twiddling your thumbs and failing usually leads to company death rather quickly in the tech world, at most a few years, yet here we are, 6 years later, with them still alive and well. A floundering company then shouldn't go on to sponsor one of the most expensive motorsports in the world for multiple years straight.", ">>{scotscott} : Blackberry's touchscreen phone But what about the storm? Or the z10? Or the passport? Or the PRIV? Or the like eighty other ones? In other news, my PRIV is truly superb. I'll probably honestly keep it for another five years if they don't end up making a second gen."], ['>>{madam1} : An Iowa congressman has proposed legislation that would block Harriet Tubman from replacing President Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill.', ">>{e_t_} : Because that's the kind of thing Congress should be spending its time on, not silly things like passing a budget.", ">>{JAG12} : King's reason for introducing the amendment was not immediately clear. Yes CNN, yes it is... blatantly clear.", ">>{greyhunter4} : Harriet Tubman is great and all but can they stop fucking with out money? If its to stop counterfeits then fine but other than that I'd like to know what the real thing looks like. We use credit cards for almost everything so when they change the bills its a little weird.", '>>{Allyn1} : TIL some people would get really confused seeing a Black woman on a dollar bill and come to the conclusion that it isn\'t "the real thing."', ">>{greyhunter4} : Well we'd have 3+ variations of the $20 bill floating around and all banks money counters would have to be updated... You know what, fuck it. This isn't worth arguing over. Be a dick all you want.", ">>{smurfsm00} : The reprehensibly bigoted GOP superstar-wannabe Steve King strikes again. Proud that I stood up to him a decade ago when he wanted to block our adding 'sexual orientation' to the list of protected groups pertaining to employment non-discrimination laws in my hometown of in Iowa. Though I no longer live in his district I am very aware of his character and the nature of his political ambitions. Illuminating quote of his in this article: “This was a divisive proposal on the part of the president,” he said in an interview Tuesday. “Mine is unifying. It just says, don’t change anything. We were happy.” - What a prick.", '>>{archeominus} : The guy is a Trump supporter. Is that surprising?', ">>{Plisskens_snake} : I don't think those machines work the way you think they do.", '>>{-LiterallyHitler} : Who cares. This whole thing seems like race bait just meant to stir up trouble.', ">>{Daotar} : They've always changed the money. Why should they stop now? Do you want to go back to the money they used 200 years ago, or do you just want everything to be the way it was when you grew up?"], ['>>{Gustacho} : President Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau hold a joint news conference at the White House.', '>>{Tenacious_Ceeee} : Canadian Press is going to ask some tough questions.', '>>{dperls} : Ah, thank god he mentioned his electoral college victory again.', ">>{onewonyuan} : He doesn't have the stamina to be president. SAD!", '>>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : Trudeau is wiping the floor with his far superior oral skills, banging it with bilingual comments, being relaxed, casual, nice speech and Trump just stands there stiff and monotone in his comments in his opening speech. Edit: Trudeau mentions Winston Churchill and all of a sudden Trump is like "oh? Something I like?"... LOL OMG I feel like this is just one giant diplomatic Trolling session...', ">>{gamjar} : Oh my god. He is so terrible at answering questions. It's like that SC beauty queen answer every damn time. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww", '>>{spqrPh} : This is fucking unbelievable :D:D:D he really did, completely dodged the question and talked about how popular he is this is just insane also Trudeaus speech, the contrast is soooo harsh :D just insane', ">>{njstore} : And he is wearing his Metamucil bronzer today. Et il porte son bronzer Metamucil aujourd'hui.", '>>{BreakingClean} : Does anyone have any information that can elaborate on their talks of energy infrastructure jobs that relate to minding the environment? Trudeau mentioned this but nothing more has been said about it.', '>>{jg_y3} : They did, they just got the usual political answers.', '>>{TribeOnAQuest} : He didnt answer the question on NAFTA on how it relates to canada...', ">>{spiffy_name} : I just want to point out he brought up his electoral college win to a question concerning Syrian refugees. He's disgusting.", ">>{mr-fiend} : To be fair, I don't think he answered any question..", ">>{ok_heh} : It must have taken every ounce of Trump's self control, of which there is about .001 ounces, not to do his handshake jack-off power move to Trudeau. He's actually learning not to do something dumb. Or Bannon sprayed his hands with pet corrector spray before the meeting.", ">>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : Trudeau well regarded, groomed, so much better looking than Trump ever was in his hey day, well spoken, highly regarded, has swagger, took control of the hand shake...and now totally out performed him with the joint conference opening comments. Trump just comes off so stiff, miserable, monotone. Wonder how it will go with Netanyahu later this week. This is like a comparison of a good leader versus an amature. Trump is also holding on to his lectern as if he's going to choke it. I'm absolutely enjoying this! Though are there that many french speaking Canadians to warrant the switching from English to French so often? Edit to add: Thanks for all the comments to elaborate how Canada is bilingual. That was just fantastic and learned something new! Thank you for letting us borrow your PM and remind us of what great leaders do and how to behave. :)", '>>{aubonpaine} : **Trump is a mess.** ###Trump is a disgrace. #Trump is a total disaster. \\*air horn*', ">>{ajustin2change} : This presidency has become so ridiculous I'm now waiting 15 minutes to watch this garbage LIVE?! I truly wish I could go back to not giving a fuck and having peace of mind, but damn this shit scary. I'm calling my representative 10 times a fucking day now.", ">>{Nautigirl} : We have a whole province that is French, and federal laws about bilingualism. Trudeau represents a Montreal riding. Many Canadians are bilingual (I could understand what he was saying in French, even if I can't speak it well).", ">>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : I think Trudeau simply was prepared for it and perfectly aligned himself to handle the situation and also used his youthful strength and charms to just stop that shit in it's tracks against the giant army pulling orange ogre.", '>>{the_mikepence} : On the French thing, pretty sure Canada does governmental business in both English and French.', '>>{Oreopenguin} : We are officially bilingual so almost everything the government does, including speeches etc is delivered in both official languages.', '>>{arthurpaliden} : Yes there are and it is also excellent gamesmanship. It is what separates the amateurs from the professionals.', ">>{Nautigirl} : I'd almost forgotten. And does Trump think we don't get American news in Canada!", '>>{vulturetrainer} : I feel like this really demonstrates how Canada is moving forward into the future while America wants to return to the dark ages.', ">>{frozenyogurttheif} : Quebec is 1/4 of the country's population. Now not all Quebecois have French as their first language, but there are French populations outside of Quebec as well. Canada has two official languages. The use of both languages regularly at a federal level is normal.", '>>{trollme_a_river} : Trump looks like a fat bag of gas next to Trudeau.', '>>{thenumber4xx} : Trudeau schooled Trump on every answer. Even though its not a debate, the journos really tried getting them to debate their opposite stances on refugees. Trudeau was so Canadian (nice) not to take more jabs at Trumps bigoted policies.', ">>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : That's pretty cool! I didn't know.. that was just pretty awesome.", ">>{PetticoatRule} : While there are many, it's really not about numbers. Two official languages = speaking in both languages. French is officially recognized in Canada and so it deserves to be treated equally. As an independent country it began as a merger between Upper and Lower Canada, modern day Ontario (mostly English) and Quebec (mostly French). Basically, it's the right thing to do regardless of the population numbers, though it's not insignificant anyway with 20% of Canadians having French as their first language.", ">>{Nautigirl} : Trudeau's election was far more of a landslide than Trump's. Trump should shut up about that when standing next to Trudeau.", '>>{alcabazar} : [About 22% by mother tongue](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_language_in_Canada) so 2 out of every 10 words should be French.', '>>{BunnyKick} : > Though are there that many french speaking Canadians to warrant the switching from English to French so often? Yeah, like, 7 or 8 million? Which is pretty significant in a country with a total population of 35 million... Not to mention, both english and french are our Official languages and thus official statements given by our PM should reflect that.', ">>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : I knew about areas being French speaking of Canada, I didn't know that doing so was a formal format. I understand what you mean about being able to 'hear' French as I'm that way with Spanish.", '>>{Nautigirl} : I wonder if he practiced? For some reason, I imagine Trudeau and Gerald Butts spending all weekend perfecting his handshake and reviewing videos. LOL', ">>{frozenyogurttheif} : The Liberal Trudeau government supports Keystone XL, so I'd expect that to move forward at some point if it's still financially viable at this point in time. The oil market has changed somewhat over the past few years.", '>>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : Wow, this makes the whole "Speak only \'murican" even that much more embarrassing for us.', '>>{alongy} : He attempted it on the first handshake, Trudeau was prepared for it with his posture/technique.', '>>{sleazus_christ} : the white house, or the "very famous white house"?', '>>{Tenacious_Ceeee} : 1/4 of the population is French and Trudeau needs those 30 second soundbites for the evening news.', '>>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : LOL "Come at me bro!" extending hand... "have at it, see if you can yank me now, bitch!"', ">>{njstore} : I can now see all the other countries coming to piss all over trump, instead of taking a pass. Gleefully. In multiple languages. Also, trump did not yank Trudeau's arm when shaking his hand. At least not yet, the day is still young.", ">>{gamjar} : Trump called on two pansy ass American reporters. One from the Daily caller and one from local news show. Both asked softball questions on 'security'. Willing to bet the other 95% of the journalists in that room wanted to ask about Flynn.", '>>{arthurpaliden} : I see Mr. Trudeau both took and answered questions is both English and French. This is to be expected as Canada is a legally bilingual country. In addition in this context it is also an excellent example of gamesmanship. You know the skill that separates the amateurs from the professionals in the political arena.', '>>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : Is it wrong if I look up one of those French sound bites just because Trudeau speaking french makes me feel tingly?', '>>{BunnyKick} : He also threw in a "tremendous" right there at the end. I bet it was totally on purpose, "speaking in Trump\'s language" will make Trump happy ("see, all the most well spoken and classy people say \'tremendous\'!"). Trump will be so pleased with this that he\'ll completely forget Trudeau just dissed on his muslim ban. Heh, diplomacy.', ">>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : I missed that (I'm at work).. that's just golden!", '>>{BunnyKick} : From what I understand, the USA doesn\'t actually *have* an "Official Language."', ">>{bmcgee} : > trump did not yank Trudeau's arm when shaking his hand Trudeau did not let Trump execute that weird handshake thing of his.", ">>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : No, we don't. I think it's been proposed, but never enacted.", ">>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : I'll google that tonight when I'm at home. :)", '>>{njstore} : Yeah, I just saw that. So great!', ">>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : Thanks! Took a glimpse, this is fascinating to me! Oh wait, it's been dubbed over with the translation. I found this right quick: https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5tuxun/president_trump_and_canadian_prime_minister/ddpa3up/?context=3 It was the switching flawlessly from one language to another that I wanted to see. That's just, delicious.", ">>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : Me too! I'm having such a crush on Canada right now!", ">>{TurtleStrangulation} : Yeah, and it's important to point out that there isn't a primary or secondary official language. Both languages have exactly the same status on the federal level."]]

classify and reply

['>>{Fitbitnitwit} : WH Denies Billing Germany for NATO. Trouble is, WH is as Dishonest as it is Stupid', '>>{-Blast-Tyrant-} : Oh, you mean to tell me the administration that loves props (blank stack of folders to show divestement and the ACA vs Trumpcare size printout) isnt using props at every chance? Right.', ">>{TheManInTheShack} : The thing about someone like Trump who lies so often and so outrageously is that it's easy to attribute to him or her just about anything and people will believe it. So even if he didn't give her an invoice, it's completely believable that he would and that's effectively the same thing. Trump is the political equivalent of a shart in that he's worse than most of us thought.", '>>{geekandwife} : As long as you do not need the high FPS for slow mo, SJCAM4000+Wifi . You can get these for under $70 USA so well under your budget and shipped to you. Works with all go pro mounts, has its own cell phone app, has the built in screen and 1080p recording... and has its own waterproof case. We just got back from the ocean where we used ours.', '>>{justfred} : I have a Liquid Image EGO. It is not "near equal quality" by a long shot. It\'s also a lot harder to use. http://www.liquidimageco.com/products/model-727-the-ego-1', '>>{mindlessrabble} : The White House now has the same level of credibility as the North Korean Dictator. To be believed they will have to line up a lot of evidence and a lot of people with credibility to support them.', ">>{Baldemoto} : >International Embarrassment It's a shame for the developed world now, not just for the US.", '>>{kenmanzano} : Xiaomi Yi Cam 2. A go pro killer, since almost same video qualilty and image quality at lower price', '>>{atarisrevenge95} : Strap a digi camera to your head with duct tape!', '>>{Neo2199} : Who are you going to believe, Lyin\' Donnie or the Germans? The moron tweeted "Despite what you have heard from the FAKE NEWS, I had a GREAT meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Nevertheless, Germany owes.....vast sums of money to NATO & the United States must be paid more for the powerful, and very expensive, defense it provides to Germany!" A rule of thumb when it comes to Trump\'s White House, if they deny it, then it is true.', '>>{rm2014} : More importantly, has anyone asked Hannity? Someone should call Hannity, I bet he knows.', '>>{ontopic} : I bet in his personal boardroom, when he has 12 sycophants and scary bodyguards behind him, idiot tricks like this work in intimidated people whose livelihoods he can destroy on a whim. I bet this came *directly* from Trump. Everything about this is embarrassing, bullying, gross, sad and completely believable.', '>>{Upboats_Ahoys} : I believe the proper quote is "as clumsy as he is stupid" -- Darth Vader.', ">>{cactusjackalope} : I love my Contours, the form factor is much better for anything speed-related, but they haven't updated anything in a very long time.", ">>{Big_Daddy_PDX} : I've got one of the Yi as well. Very competitive cam for $80. However, the accessories aren't as commonly available.", ">>{MaximumEffort433} : One *small* bit of solace that I take in President Tromp's gross incompetence is that they will have an incredibly difficult time lying us into another war. The vast majority of us took them at their word when the George W. Bush White House came to the American people, looked us in the eye, and told us that we absolutely *had* to go to war with Iraq. Yes the experts said it was bullshit, yes the evidence was sketchy (at best), yes it all sounded like the hard sell for an undercoat, but these people knew their shit and had information that we didn't. It seemed like a long shot, but why in the hell would the President ever blatantly lie us into an unnecessary armed conflict? More than a decade, and a trillion dollars, later, we know a little bit better. Donnie's incredible disrespect for the truth isn't a complete inoculation against being lied to, but it does provide some protection that we haven't gotten in the past. Then again, looking at how deeply devoted so many seem to this man, a *foreign* war may not be the threat we need to fear.", '>>{wanshin} : I use a first gen Xiaoyi, its great so far. High quality video. I got a spare battery for extended use.', '>>{failure68} : apparently anything out of the center third of the shot is slightly blurry, colors are blown out(takes longer to readjust), and footage from the gopro line just looks much more crisp', '>>{kenmanzano} : How come the reviews in Yt has pretty decent comparison over the go pro', ">>{IYSMRTTKU} : It is exactly this aspect of his presidency that I feel is sorely underestimated. The potential for this administration to deal blows to our credibility as a nation that will (quite literally, I believe) cost us dearly in international relations, less favorable trade deals, etc. extend well beyond the Presidential term. Whoever succeeds Trump is going to have one hell of a mess to clean up, and we're not even 100 days into his holding office yet. The reverberant impact is going to be felt many, many, many years from now.", '>>{unsafeatNESP} : in other news, water is wet and the sky is blue.', ">>{4H01} : I'm using a polaroid cube and am pretty pleased with it 😊", ">>{poopsiegirl} : There's a product available in Australia called Shotbox. I'm not sure if its global. My other half sold them alongside GoPro so we ended up with one of each. We couldn't fault the shotbox and we used both units a lot, in a range of environments. Accessories all interchangeable and markedly cheaper than GoPro. Really high quality, I'd buy a shotbox again if cost was an issue. They're great.", ">>{hairy_chicken} : I would expect that she has class and wouldn't have a commment. Some of her staffers, might have some choice words to share.", '>>{suckZEN} : not to be confused with that other rule: if they accuse you of something, they do it', '>>{Cyph3rS6m} : Yeah... i mean, you are definetly right. Theres absolutely no replace for the gopro. Nothing can replace the sudden freezes, the "not-recording bug and so on. I spent good money on my hero 2 and since the last update it gave me more headaches than vídeo files. If you would ask me before the damn update i would have told you there was no replacement for the brand. Now i will take anything.', '>>{Anatole78} : Here is a quick breakdown by priority: - Image quality: SONY FDR-X1000V - Ruggedness: Ricoh WG-M2 or Garmin VIRB XE - Lightness: Panasonic HX-A1 - Price: SJ4000+ Wi-Fi Hope you find one that suits your needs :)', '>>{travio} : Kind of ironic that the right gave obama shit for his "apology tour" when the next pres will likely have to have a real one.', '>>{failure68} : oh shoot.. didnt update yet but i guess theyre doing that Apple thing where new software is too much for old devices to handle', '>>{KommieZombic} : I tried to make a trumpy but ended up taking a dumpy.', '>>{Cyph3rS6m} : Please dont update, (if you have the hero 2). The thing is i did my research in time and told my brothers not to update cause i read somwhere that it was a no-go. Anyhow, my little bro forgot about that. Aparently. And told me "you know what? We never done the update for this one" . Long story short, the camera doesn\'t record one out of two times you ask for it. Even when it does it may stop suddenly. We ran an obstacle-mud-race and had to check every five minutes that it was in fact turned on. I mad at the brand and don\'t recommend updating anything until you check it ok to do it. But I may have overreacted; I still believe GoPro is way better than the other options. Even Sony; their camera lens catches drops of water on the sea, blocking the whole picture ruining the shot.', '>>{-Blast-Tyrant-} : It was someone else from her staff that leaked the story', ">>{must-be-aliens} : > The only thing a man has is his word Once you've lost your word you can never get it back.", ">>{allwordsaremadeup} : if germany had a trump, sure, but germany has a merkel and she'll try and salvage what she can like an adult..", '>>{JitGoinHam} : Lord Vader, we delivered the invoice to the German Cha--ah--*ahh*-- "You have failed me for the last time, President Trump." \\*Trump collapses\\* "Make ready to apologize to the German government. *You* are in command now, President Pence."', '>>{Ganjake} : [Stupid is as stupid does.](https://i.imgflip.com/z9z8v.jpg)', '>>{pillsneedlespowders} : Somehow I doubt the hoardes of Alabama Trumpers will be any great threat to anyone but themselves.', ">>{TheManInTheShack} : That's exactly what I was thinking. And the likelihood is that Trump will be followed by a democrat who, like Obama, will have to spend time apologizing for Trump and will then be once again ridiculed for it by the right.", '>>{beelseboob} : Coincidentally, in Scotland, the word trump means a particularly loud and boisterous fart.', '>>{MaximumEffort433} : As long as they have guns *and* cars they will continue to be a threat to all of us. =/', ">>{pillsneedlespowders} : I.... guess? Look at what happened with those fucknuts in Oregon, that's who you're dealing with here. They don't have the balls to start a revolution, and even if they did, they'd get their asses handed to them.", '>>{2_Sheds_Jackson} : I would love to see an image of this invoice. I wonder what line items he included: - Tanks, lots 5 B - Planes, many 15 B - Officers, best 20 B', ">>{MikeKM} : I'm sure you could add smelly and stinky to that definition.", ">>{tribal_thinking} : Trump finally brought respect and dignity back to the office of the Presidency. Now I'm tired of winning. Can we stop now?", '>>{betyamissme} : I don\'t think he would deny it, sounds like something he\'d be proud of. He\'s the "we\'ll send them a bill" type. Don\'t get me wrong, it\'s dumb as all fuck, but it sounds like our guy.', ">>{Trininsta_raven} : Fuck the treasonous right side of the isle, at this point I've lost respect for a large majority of republicans. If they still support Donald's action en mass I don't think I should really value their Russian ideas.", '>>{TheManInTheShack} : It appears that Trump idolizes Putin considering Putin is one of the richest men in the world and got there using his political power to enrich himself. Trump wishes to be just like him.', ">>{MrSquicky} : Honestly, does it really matter if he actually printed out a fake invoice if his on the record position is the same, and as stupid? He has publicly said that Germany owes NATO and the US money, which is ridiculous. Did he actually print up a fake invoice? Yeah, probably, but that's just a continuation of the absurdity of his actual stated position; it's a little extra embarrassment on top of the main source of embarrassment, which is an indisputable part of the public record."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{geekandwife} : As long as you do not need the high FPS for slow mo, SJCAM4000+Wifi . You can get these for under $70 USA so well under your budget and shipped to you. Works with all go pro mounts, has its own cell phone app, has the built in screen and 1080p recording... and has its own waterproof case. We just got back from the ocean where we used ours.', '>>{justfred} : I have a Liquid Image EGO. It is not "near equal quality" by a long shot. It\'s also a lot harder to use. http://www.liquidimageco.com/products/model-727-the-ego-1', '>>{kenmanzano} : Xiaomi Yi Cam 2. A go pro killer, since almost same video qualilty and image quality at lower price', '>>{atarisrevenge95} : Strap a digi camera to your head with duct tape!', ">>{cactusjackalope} : I love my Contours, the form factor is much better for anything speed-related, but they haven't updated anything in a very long time.", ">>{Big_Daddy_PDX} : I've got one of the Yi as well. Very competitive cam for $80. However, the accessories aren't as commonly available.", '>>{wanshin} : I use a first gen Xiaoyi, its great so far. High quality video. I got a spare battery for extended use.', '>>{failure68} : apparently anything out of the center third of the shot is slightly blurry, colors are blown out(takes longer to readjust), and footage from the gopro line just looks much more crisp', '>>{kenmanzano} : How come the reviews in Yt has pretty decent comparison over the go pro', ">>{4H01} : I'm using a polaroid cube and am pretty pleased with it 😊", ">>{poopsiegirl} : There's a product available in Australia called Shotbox. I'm not sure if its global. My other half sold them alongside GoPro so we ended up with one of each. We couldn't fault the shotbox and we used both units a lot, in a range of environments. Accessories all interchangeable and markedly cheaper than GoPro. Really high quality, I'd buy a shotbox again if cost was an issue. They're great.", '>>{Cyph3rS6m} : Yeah... i mean, you are definetly right. Theres absolutely no replace for the gopro. Nothing can replace the sudden freezes, the "not-recording bug and so on. I spent good money on my hero 2 and since the last update it gave me more headaches than vídeo files. If you would ask me before the damn update i would have told you there was no replacement for the brand. Now i will take anything.', '>>{Anatole78} : Here is a quick breakdown by priority: - Image quality: SONY FDR-X1000V - Ruggedness: Ricoh WG-M2 or Garmin VIRB XE - Lightness: Panasonic HX-A1 - Price: SJ4000+ Wi-Fi Hope you find one that suits your needs :)', '>>{failure68} : oh shoot.. didnt update yet but i guess theyre doing that Apple thing where new software is too much for old devices to handle', '>>{Cyph3rS6m} : Please dont update, (if you have the hero 2). The thing is i did my research in time and told my brothers not to update cause i read somwhere that it was a no-go. Anyhow, my little bro forgot about that. Aparently. And told me "you know what? We never done the update for this one" . Long story short, the camera doesn\'t record one out of two times you ask for it. Even when it does it may stop suddenly. We ran an obstacle-mud-race and had to check every five minutes that it was in fact turned on. I mad at the brand and don\'t recommend updating anything until you check it ok to do it. But I may have overreacted; I still believe GoPro is way better than the other options. Even Sony; their camera lens catches drops of water on the sea, blocking the whole picture ruining the shot.'], ['>>{Fitbitnitwit} : WH Denies Billing Germany for NATO. Trouble is, WH is as Dishonest as it is Stupid', '>>{-Blast-Tyrant-} : Oh, you mean to tell me the administration that loves props (blank stack of folders to show divestement and the ACA vs Trumpcare size printout) isnt using props at every chance? Right.', ">>{TheManInTheShack} : The thing about someone like Trump who lies so often and so outrageously is that it's easy to attribute to him or her just about anything and people will believe it. So even if he didn't give her an invoice, it's completely believable that he would and that's effectively the same thing. Trump is the political equivalent of a shart in that he's worse than most of us thought.", '>>{mindlessrabble} : The White House now has the same level of credibility as the North Korean Dictator. To be believed they will have to line up a lot of evidence and a lot of people with credibility to support them.', ">>{Baldemoto} : >International Embarrassment It's a shame for the developed world now, not just for the US.", '>>{Neo2199} : Who are you going to believe, Lyin\' Donnie or the Germans? The moron tweeted "Despite what you have heard from the FAKE NEWS, I had a GREAT meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Nevertheless, Germany owes.....vast sums of money to NATO & the United States must be paid more for the powerful, and very expensive, defense it provides to Germany!" A rule of thumb when it comes to Trump\'s White House, if they deny it, then it is true.', '>>{rm2014} : More importantly, has anyone asked Hannity? Someone should call Hannity, I bet he knows.', '>>{ontopic} : I bet in his personal boardroom, when he has 12 sycophants and scary bodyguards behind him, idiot tricks like this work in intimidated people whose livelihoods he can destroy on a whim. I bet this came *directly* from Trump. Everything about this is embarrassing, bullying, gross, sad and completely believable.', '>>{Upboats_Ahoys} : I believe the proper quote is "as clumsy as he is stupid" -- Darth Vader.', ">>{MaximumEffort433} : One *small* bit of solace that I take in President Tromp's gross incompetence is that they will have an incredibly difficult time lying us into another war. The vast majority of us took them at their word when the George W. Bush White House came to the American people, looked us in the eye, and told us that we absolutely *had* to go to war with Iraq. Yes the experts said it was bullshit, yes the evidence was sketchy (at best), yes it all sounded like the hard sell for an undercoat, but these people knew their shit and had information that we didn't. It seemed like a long shot, but why in the hell would the President ever blatantly lie us into an unnecessary armed conflict? More than a decade, and a trillion dollars, later, we know a little bit better. Donnie's incredible disrespect for the truth isn't a complete inoculation against being lied to, but it does provide some protection that we haven't gotten in the past. Then again, looking at how deeply devoted so many seem to this man, a *foreign* war may not be the threat we need to fear.", ">>{IYSMRTTKU} : It is exactly this aspect of his presidency that I feel is sorely underestimated. The potential for this administration to deal blows to our credibility as a nation that will (quite literally, I believe) cost us dearly in international relations, less favorable trade deals, etc. extend well beyond the Presidential term. Whoever succeeds Trump is going to have one hell of a mess to clean up, and we're not even 100 days into his holding office yet. The reverberant impact is going to be felt many, many, many years from now.", '>>{unsafeatNESP} : in other news, water is wet and the sky is blue.', ">>{hairy_chicken} : I would expect that she has class and wouldn't have a commment. Some of her staffers, might have some choice words to share.", '>>{suckZEN} : not to be confused with that other rule: if they accuse you of something, they do it', '>>{travio} : Kind of ironic that the right gave obama shit for his "apology tour" when the next pres will likely have to have a real one.', '>>{KommieZombic} : I tried to make a trumpy but ended up taking a dumpy.', '>>{-Blast-Tyrant-} : It was someone else from her staff that leaked the story', ">>{must-be-aliens} : > The only thing a man has is his word Once you've lost your word you can never get it back.", ">>{allwordsaremadeup} : if germany had a trump, sure, but germany has a merkel and she'll try and salvage what she can like an adult..", '>>{JitGoinHam} : Lord Vader, we delivered the invoice to the German Cha--ah--*ahh*-- "You have failed me for the last time, President Trump." \\*Trump collapses\\* "Make ready to apologize to the German government. *You* are in command now, President Pence."', '>>{Ganjake} : [Stupid is as stupid does.](https://i.imgflip.com/z9z8v.jpg)', '>>{pillsneedlespowders} : Somehow I doubt the hoardes of Alabama Trumpers will be any great threat to anyone but themselves.', ">>{TheManInTheShack} : That's exactly what I was thinking. And the likelihood is that Trump will be followed by a democrat who, like Obama, will have to spend time apologizing for Trump and will then be once again ridiculed for it by the right.", '>>{beelseboob} : Coincidentally, in Scotland, the word trump means a particularly loud and boisterous fart.', '>>{MaximumEffort433} : As long as they have guns *and* cars they will continue to be a threat to all of us. =/', ">>{pillsneedlespowders} : I.... guess? Look at what happened with those fucknuts in Oregon, that's who you're dealing with here. They don't have the balls to start a revolution, and even if they did, they'd get their asses handed to them.", '>>{2_Sheds_Jackson} : I would love to see an image of this invoice. I wonder what line items he included: - Tanks, lots 5 B - Planes, many 15 B - Officers, best 20 B', ">>{MikeKM} : I'm sure you could add smelly and stinky to that definition.", ">>{tribal_thinking} : Trump finally brought respect and dignity back to the office of the Presidency. Now I'm tired of winning. Can we stop now?", '>>{betyamissme} : I don\'t think he would deny it, sounds like something he\'d be proud of. He\'s the "we\'ll send them a bill" type. Don\'t get me wrong, it\'s dumb as all fuck, but it sounds like our guy.', ">>{Trininsta_raven} : Fuck the treasonous right side of the isle, at this point I've lost respect for a large majority of republicans. If they still support Donald's action en mass I don't think I should really value their Russian ideas.", '>>{TheManInTheShack} : It appears that Trump idolizes Putin considering Putin is one of the richest men in the world and got there using his political power to enrich himself. Trump wishes to be just like him.', ">>{MrSquicky} : Honestly, does it really matter if he actually printed out a fake invoice if his on the record position is the same, and as stupid? He has publicly said that Germany owes NATO and the US money, which is ridiculous. Did he actually print up a fake invoice? Yeah, probably, but that's just a continuation of the absurdity of his actual stated position; it's a little extra embarrassment on top of the main source of embarrassment, which is an indisputable part of the public record."]]

classify and reply

['>>{ledhe} : Bernie Sanders thinks this $89,000-a-year drug should be $1,000 a year', '>>{hilly969} : Why Americans Should Move to Canada if Trump Wins the Election', ">>{b0redengr} : Woah! He's CRAZY! It's CRAZY Bernie Sanders! Who the hell is this guy to suggest a reasonable way to make drugs more affordable?! CRAZY I tell you! Pie in the sky!", '>>{AdSin15} : I agree with him. Is there anyone who thinks a drug should cost 89K?', ">>{kaett} : hey docs, i'll make you a deal... i'll start seeing you again when the cost of the stuff that's supposed to fix me doesn't cost double my yearly pay.", ">>{kaett} : only if you're literally taking $89,000 in cash, shredding it, and pumping it directly into my veins.", ">>{Ajreil} : From the article: >“We urge you to keep the price of this relatively common steroid at its current importation cost,” or about $1,000 to $1,200 a year, the letter said. In other words, it costs that much to import the drug from other countries. There's no reason to increase the price to $89,000 if it costs $1,000 to $1,200 to import.", '>>{DonkeyKongCountry2} : oh yeah i hope the liberals do leave when Trump wins', '>>{lingsmitty72} : Whatever! You people with your polite manners and your free healthcare and your maple syrup.', ">>{muddypaws} : 'Least racist person' Trump asks black reporter if black caucus are 'friends of yours'", '>>{steakmehome78} : This article would have been pretty relevant back in March after Super Tuesday as well.', '>>{phadrus56} : They can go live with the draft dodgers who are trying to come back.', ">>{swishcheese} : I can't believe we have Trump in the white house over Sanders.", ">>{Allyn1} : We're in this position because every chance at controlling drug prices has been shot down, bipartisanly. You might never find a politician who says there should be drugs that can cost so much, but most of them are fine with it because they're being paid by companies that want the opportunity to sell their drug for $89,000.", '>>{ohnothejuiceisloose} : I really think that was the first time Trump ever heard the words "congressional black caucus" and he genuinely didn\'t know what it was. That\'s why he asked if they were friends of hers and if she could set up a meeting. He thinks the Congressional Black Caucus is a group of citizen activists like Black Lives Matter.', '>>{itwrk} : Donald Trump is a racist. He and his father systematically barred black people from living in his apartment complexes. Call him what he is, a racist.', '>>{imaginaryme24} : I think everyone agrees Pharma prices are out of control, so how about Congress does something about regulating the industry rather than asking them to politely self-regulate. They do not care about the common good. They care about profit.', '>>{AdSin15} : Yup. Of course I would say that there is really just one "Monoparty" in the USA. There are very few differences between the GOP and the DNC nowadays unless you\'re talking about race, religion or sex. Both parties are in almost complete agreement on Economics, Foreign Policy, etc.', ">>{Allyn1} : >There's no reason to increase the price to $89,000 if it costs $1,000 to $1,200 to import. Yes there is. 'Free market innovation.'", ">>{ledhe} : Well that didn't work out very well for her in Wisconsin.", ">>{kiarra33} : But what a stupid reply from Sanders, California doesn't need free college and realistically could have it right now. 300 million isn't that much but WI voted for the same shit as always. It just seems like having a governor that's already cutting education funding is evil?", ">>{Ajreil} : If they don't get a 5,000% profit, why would they continue to innovate?", ">>{AdSin15} : Big Pharma owns both parties so this problem isn't gonna be solved unless the American People end the Duopoly and vote 3rd party.", '>>{hghway66} : You mean when searches for "how can I move to Canada" spiked by over 300%?', '>>{_Underoath_} : You should[ watch this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIH-J3uLN3E) if you seriously think moving to Canada will be good for you.', ">>{ianrl337} : This story keeps popping up and I can't believe he didn't know this. He is either stupid, racist, or both, there is no in between here. I honestly someone should sit him in front of a TV and tell him there is a great documentary on how to be a good president he has to watch. Then make him binge watch the West Wing.", '>>{ledhe} : How is that a stupid reply? If states all over the country are providing free public college, then the best and brightest will flee states like Wisconsin if Scott Walker refuses to get on board.', ">>{TJ_McWeaksauce} : You're making the mistake of thinking that Donald can wrap his brain around Sorkin's writing. That dude uses too many big words, and the actors deliver their lines too fast. He wouldn't get past the first episode.", ">>{Dinkir9} : Better get going to find another 90+% white country that'll take us in while we talk about how much we love PoCs.", '>>{techgirl_33} : Hahaha poor Canada. They\'re going to have all these people from the US and England trying to flee there. Pretty soon they\'ll build a wall and politely tell us all to go fuck ourselves while handing us a beer and saying "no hard feelings right"', ">>{TJ_McWeaksauce} : Next, Donald is going to ask his new Secretary of Labor pick - R. Alexander Acosta - if he can help convince Mexico to pay for that wall. Sure, Acosta isn't Mexican, but brown is brown, right?", ">>{allahucrunchybar} : You mean all black people don't know each other? Sad!", ">>{kiarra33} : Most states that need it have republican governors and if not GOP legislatures There's out of state college fees. If you are from California it costs way more to go to college in Colorado then California. NY and CA could do it but that wouldn't be the best", ">>{theombudsmen} : Totally, the country would be so much better if we all had a single opinion and that opinion matched yours. I don't like people that hold different opinions from me either.", '>>{gaeuvyen} : no drug should be 89k a year. no drug should ever cost more than the yearly salary of the average American.', ">>{_Underoath_} : I'm sure its full of nice and friendly people just like the liberal media says!", ">>{gaeuvyen} : They're the same in fact that they want to push for a bunch of shit *no one wants*, the difference is on one side, they do those things while also enticing voters with things conservatives want, and the other side is doing those things while enticing voters with things liberals want. But both sides just want to extort the voters. At some point, the voters have to get tired of having shit on their shoes no matter how much ice cream they get in return.", ">>{gaeuvyen} : Cost of education is a moot point whent you're talking about offering FREE EDUCATION!", ">>{Loki0005} : Hit the road, Jack Don't you come back no more no more no more no more Hit the road, Jack Don't you come back no more (And take your ugly bitches with you)", ">>{RxVote} : I'm with Ruth: New Zealand for me too!", ">>{ballzybex} : canada's kinda boring, let's be real. dry british wit (and their europe-related political mares) ftw", ">>{dorkofthepolisci} : Yes, because moving to another country when the other dude wins is totally a viable option for most people. It's not like there are immigration laws or anything! /s As a side-note to anyone actually considering this: You will not be eligible for provincial medical coverage without legal status/being considered a resident of that province. Also god help you if you plan on fleeing to Vancouver or Toronto.", ">>{RynheartTheReluctant} : Woah! Docs aren't doing this. Slam big Pharma.", '>>{kaett} : i realize that, but the medical professionals are in a good position to also be able to lobby for lowering the cost of drugs.', ">>{zapichigo} : How come y'all think you can just up and move here? We are not the frickin USA, you know, we have rules, ya can't just stumble over the border and pitch a tent. Unless you BYOB, then it's all good.", '>>{InFearn0} : To get Trump hooked, show him the clip of the Hummer crushing the Prius.', '>>{TrumpOrTrump} : Vancouver and Toronto are North Americas highest ranking cities for quality of life.', '>>{DonutsMcKenzie} : Donald, are the Insane Clown Posse friends of yours...? Why do I ask...? Uhhh.... No reason....', ">>{Master_Builder} : Hold up, they are nothing like black lives matter. And if true that's fucking hilarious", '>>{Zykium} : I prefer the term "Alternative Equal Rights Activist".', ">>{_Underoath_} : Ever been there? It's beautiful, but not safe.", '>>{srgreendown} : He was a few words away from saying Black Cactus', ">>{CrochetedRockets} : Well, she asked if he would be meeting with the black caucus. She's black. To be fair, maybe he was just trying to be quick on his feet and assumed she was part of the organization? But yeah, that went over like a turd in the punch bowl.", ">>{ThisIsTheMilos} : The way he reacts makes it seem clear he has no idea who they are. Being unsure of an acronym isn't an issue, being unsure of the Congressional Black Caucus is unacceptable for a president.", ">>{alaska6} : Man, I've been there a few times and never felt unsafe. Granted, I'm in deeper Mexico usually not near the border towns. Just some of the nicest people in the world.", '>>{ThisIsTheMilos} : To be fair, maybe he is just a racist who thinks that he is not?', '>>{noxylophone} : A real batch of patriots, those who would leave.', ">>{dorkofthepolisci} : They're also highly unaffordable and have huge issues with poverty and homelessness. *edit - unless you consider $400k starter condos affordable, then disregard everything I've said*", '>>{coquio} : All black people know each other. Everybody knows that.', '>>{ozabelle} : yes i have, never felt unsafe, had no problems. i dont watch fox news tv and i\'m not a "conservative" so i\'m not obliged to be paranoid.', '>>{punkideas} : I bet he asks Ben Carson about them in the near future.', ">>{StandHampton} : But they actually track foreigners in the country on visas, so you have to go through their processes, better start learning Spanish now, because that is a requirement, no lefty liberal immigration policy's there, and no state monies either, support yourself or hit the road http://www.mexperience.com/lifestyle/living-in-mexico/visas-and-immigration/", ">>{alaska6} : Oh I know pretty decent Spanish. But my girlfriend is a dual citizen of the US and Australia, so if we move anywhere it's there. No plans to though, Trump ain't winning.", ">>{ohnothejuiceisloose} : To be fair, if he thinks a reporter (whom he knows and recognized) is a member of the CONGRESSIONAL Black Caucus, he's an idiot. Congressional Black Caucus members are members of congress. It's not ok for the President not to know that.", '>>{TheRealDL} : 1st generation US immigrant from Sud Quebec. Mercí.', '>>{DonkeyKongCountry2} : Im not the one proposing to leave the country if my candidate loses.', '>>{sunstersun} : yeah because middleclass/poor people cant fucking live there.', ">>{_mr_Q_} : What about Hillary? There's so much wrong with Trump, however there's a lot more wrong with Hillary. We should move regardless.", '>>{unbekanntMann} : His defense of Jewish people was the epitome of racist.."I have 3 Jewish friends! "', '>>{shartoberfest} : Donald, you know this bag of old moldy oranges? Sure you do.', '>>{Resist_Fascism} : any one know if the reporter was in fact asking on behalf of the black caucus?', '>>{enemyoftheworld} : No. She works for American Urban Radio Networks.', ">>{PMMeYourJobOffer} : We love you guys, but if you elect Trump, we're not moving to the US to bail you out.", '>>{mbrochh} : I guess that makes him a "So-called least racist person"...', '>>{BuckeyeBentley} : Him not knowing who "the CBC" is with not much for a context clue isn\'t terrible, but assuming the reporter knows all black people and will set up a meeting for him (because she\'s a woman and that\'s what they do?) is incredibly shitty. Also at the very least I\'m sure the President\'s staff would not like it if reporters just started setting up meetings for the President.', ">>{StandHampton} : Aussie, is nice, if you don't mind the taxes, of course they will also track your visa, so you better get married quick", '>>{ohnothejuiceisloose} : She said CBC, and then she said the words "Congressional Black Caucus", and he *still* didn\'t know who they are. And even if she hadn\'t spelled it out for him and had just said "the CBC" and left it at that, in the context of the question, which was about outreach to the black community, there\'s no excuse for a President not knowing who "the CBC" is.', '>>{alaska6} : Yep, lived there for a bit already so totally comfortable with it.', '>>{phadrus56} : Some of us stayed and fought for our country. Others cut and run and then wanted to come back when the war was over.', '>>{quinoakween} : Who says we want all them Yankees here? It should be a requirement before moving that you renounce making fun of Canucks and use "sorry" at least every 7 mins.', '>>{theombudsmen} : Neither are "the liberals" despite what the media tries to shovel into your brain. Theres always fringe drama-queens on the right and left. Just as many idiots claiming they will leave the country if Hillary is elected. Same as it was with Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, etc.', '>>{TrumpOrTrump} : I am sorry but the "huge" issue with poverty you claim is false. Vancouver has a poverty rate around 7% which is about half the poverty rate in America. You can make whatever claims you wish but Vancouver consistently scores among the top 10 cities in the world and has for the last 15 years. That is not say it is without issues.', ">>{dorkofthepolisci} : Perhaps huge is the wrong word, but there is certainly an issue with housing and homelessness. At one point, the DTES was colloquially known as one of the poorest (urban?) postal codes in Canada. *Vancouver has a poverty rate around 7% which is about half the poverty rate in America.* Honest question: What do you mean by poverty rate? Are you talking about people living below the poverty line? Because that doesn't *really* paint an accurate picture, when you're talking about a city that is also ranked as *highly unaffordable*. What about compared to metro areas that are demographically similar or a similar size?", ">>{alaska6} : As I said earlier, I'm not going anywhere cause Trump isn't winning"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{ledhe} : Bernie Sanders thinks this $89,000-a-year drug should be $1,000 a year', ">>{b0redengr} : Woah! He's CRAZY! It's CRAZY Bernie Sanders! Who the hell is this guy to suggest a reasonable way to make drugs more affordable?! CRAZY I tell you! Pie in the sky!", '>>{AdSin15} : I agree with him. Is there anyone who thinks a drug should cost 89K?', ">>{kaett} : hey docs, i'll make you a deal... i'll start seeing you again when the cost of the stuff that's supposed to fix me doesn't cost double my yearly pay.", ">>{kaett} : only if you're literally taking $89,000 in cash, shredding it, and pumping it directly into my veins.", ">>{Ajreil} : From the article: >“We urge you to keep the price of this relatively common steroid at its current importation cost,” or about $1,000 to $1,200 a year, the letter said. In other words, it costs that much to import the drug from other countries. There's no reason to increase the price to $89,000 if it costs $1,000 to $1,200 to import.", ">>{swishcheese} : I can't believe we have Trump in the white house over Sanders.", ">>{Allyn1} : We're in this position because every chance at controlling drug prices has been shot down, bipartisanly. You might never find a politician who says there should be drugs that can cost so much, but most of them are fine with it because they're being paid by companies that want the opportunity to sell their drug for $89,000.", '>>{imaginaryme24} : I think everyone agrees Pharma prices are out of control, so how about Congress does something about regulating the industry rather than asking them to politely self-regulate. They do not care about the common good. They care about profit.', '>>{AdSin15} : Yup. Of course I would say that there is really just one "Monoparty" in the USA. There are very few differences between the GOP and the DNC nowadays unless you\'re talking about race, religion or sex. Both parties are in almost complete agreement on Economics, Foreign Policy, etc.', ">>{Allyn1} : >There's no reason to increase the price to $89,000 if it costs $1,000 to $1,200 to import. Yes there is. 'Free market innovation.'", ">>{ledhe} : Well that didn't work out very well for her in Wisconsin.", ">>{kiarra33} : But what a stupid reply from Sanders, California doesn't need free college and realistically could have it right now. 300 million isn't that much but WI voted for the same shit as always. It just seems like having a governor that's already cutting education funding is evil?", ">>{Ajreil} : If they don't get a 5,000% profit, why would they continue to innovate?", ">>{AdSin15} : Big Pharma owns both parties so this problem isn't gonna be solved unless the American People end the Duopoly and vote 3rd party.", '>>{ledhe} : How is that a stupid reply? If states all over the country are providing free public college, then the best and brightest will flee states like Wisconsin if Scott Walker refuses to get on board.', ">>{kiarra33} : Most states that need it have republican governors and if not GOP legislatures There's out of state college fees. If you are from California it costs way more to go to college in Colorado then California. NY and CA could do it but that wouldn't be the best", '>>{gaeuvyen} : no drug should be 89k a year. no drug should ever cost more than the yearly salary of the average American.', ">>{gaeuvyen} : They're the same in fact that they want to push for a bunch of shit *no one wants*, the difference is on one side, they do those things while also enticing voters with things conservatives want, and the other side is doing those things while enticing voters with things liberals want. But both sides just want to extort the voters. At some point, the voters have to get tired of having shit on their shoes no matter how much ice cream they get in return.", ">>{gaeuvyen} : Cost of education is a moot point whent you're talking about offering FREE EDUCATION!", ">>{RynheartTheReluctant} : Woah! Docs aren't doing this. Slam big Pharma.", '>>{kaett} : i realize that, but the medical professionals are in a good position to also be able to lobby for lowering the cost of drugs.'], [">>{muddypaws} : 'Least racist person' Trump asks black reporter if black caucus are 'friends of yours'", '>>{ohnothejuiceisloose} : I really think that was the first time Trump ever heard the words "congressional black caucus" and he genuinely didn\'t know what it was. That\'s why he asked if they were friends of hers and if she could set up a meeting. He thinks the Congressional Black Caucus is a group of citizen activists like Black Lives Matter.', '>>{itwrk} : Donald Trump is a racist. He and his father systematically barred black people from living in his apartment complexes. Call him what he is, a racist.', ">>{ianrl337} : This story keeps popping up and I can't believe he didn't know this. He is either stupid, racist, or both, there is no in between here. I honestly someone should sit him in front of a TV and tell him there is a great documentary on how to be a good president he has to watch. Then make him binge watch the West Wing.", ">>{TJ_McWeaksauce} : You're making the mistake of thinking that Donald can wrap his brain around Sorkin's writing. That dude uses too many big words, and the actors deliver their lines too fast. He wouldn't get past the first episode.", ">>{TJ_McWeaksauce} : Next, Donald is going to ask his new Secretary of Labor pick - R. Alexander Acosta - if he can help convince Mexico to pay for that wall. Sure, Acosta isn't Mexican, but brown is brown, right?", ">>{allahucrunchybar} : You mean all black people don't know each other? Sad!", '>>{InFearn0} : To get Trump hooked, show him the clip of the Hummer crushing the Prius.', '>>{DonutsMcKenzie} : Donald, are the Insane Clown Posse friends of yours...? Why do I ask...? Uhhh.... No reason....', ">>{Master_Builder} : Hold up, they are nothing like black lives matter. And if true that's fucking hilarious", '>>{Zykium} : I prefer the term "Alternative Equal Rights Activist".', '>>{srgreendown} : He was a few words away from saying Black Cactus', ">>{CrochetedRockets} : Well, she asked if he would be meeting with the black caucus. She's black. To be fair, maybe he was just trying to be quick on his feet and assumed she was part of the organization? But yeah, that went over like a turd in the punch bowl.", ">>{ThisIsTheMilos} : The way he reacts makes it seem clear he has no idea who they are. Being unsure of an acronym isn't an issue, being unsure of the Congressional Black Caucus is unacceptable for a president.", '>>{ThisIsTheMilos} : To be fair, maybe he is just a racist who thinks that he is not?', '>>{coquio} : All black people know each other. Everybody knows that.', '>>{punkideas} : I bet he asks Ben Carson about them in the near future.', ">>{ohnothejuiceisloose} : To be fair, if he thinks a reporter (whom he knows and recognized) is a member of the CONGRESSIONAL Black Caucus, he's an idiot. Congressional Black Caucus members are members of congress. It's not ok for the President not to know that.", '>>{unbekanntMann} : His defense of Jewish people was the epitome of racist.."I have 3 Jewish friends! "', '>>{shartoberfest} : Donald, you know this bag of old moldy oranges? Sure you do.', '>>{Resist_Fascism} : any one know if the reporter was in fact asking on behalf of the black caucus?', '>>{enemyoftheworld} : No. She works for American Urban Radio Networks.', '>>{mbrochh} : I guess that makes him a "So-called least racist person"...', '>>{BuckeyeBentley} : Him not knowing who "the CBC" is with not much for a context clue isn\'t terrible, but assuming the reporter knows all black people and will set up a meeting for him (because she\'s a woman and that\'s what they do?) is incredibly shitty. Also at the very least I\'m sure the President\'s staff would not like it if reporters just started setting up meetings for the President.', '>>{ohnothejuiceisloose} : She said CBC, and then she said the words "Congressional Black Caucus", and he *still* didn\'t know who they are. And even if she hadn\'t spelled it out for him and had just said "the CBC" and left it at that, in the context of the question, which was about outreach to the black community, there\'s no excuse for a President not knowing who "the CBC" is.'], ['>>{hilly969} : Why Americans Should Move to Canada if Trump Wins the Election', '>>{DonkeyKongCountry2} : oh yeah i hope the liberals do leave when Trump wins', '>>{lingsmitty72} : Whatever! You people with your polite manners and your free healthcare and your maple syrup.', '>>{steakmehome78} : This article would have been pretty relevant back in March after Super Tuesday as well.', '>>{phadrus56} : They can go live with the draft dodgers who are trying to come back.', '>>{hghway66} : You mean when searches for "how can I move to Canada" spiked by over 300%?', '>>{_Underoath_} : You should[ watch this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIH-J3uLN3E) if you seriously think moving to Canada will be good for you.', ">>{Dinkir9} : Better get going to find another 90+% white country that'll take us in while we talk about how much we love PoCs.", '>>{techgirl_33} : Hahaha poor Canada. They\'re going to have all these people from the US and England trying to flee there. Pretty soon they\'ll build a wall and politely tell us all to go fuck ourselves while handing us a beer and saying "no hard feelings right"', ">>{theombudsmen} : Totally, the country would be so much better if we all had a single opinion and that opinion matched yours. I don't like people that hold different opinions from me either.", ">>{_Underoath_} : I'm sure its full of nice and friendly people just like the liberal media says!", ">>{Loki0005} : Hit the road, Jack Don't you come back no more no more no more no more Hit the road, Jack Don't you come back no more (And take your ugly bitches with you)", ">>{RxVote} : I'm with Ruth: New Zealand for me too!", ">>{ballzybex} : canada's kinda boring, let's be real. dry british wit (and their europe-related political mares) ftw", ">>{dorkofthepolisci} : Yes, because moving to another country when the other dude wins is totally a viable option for most people. It's not like there are immigration laws or anything! /s As a side-note to anyone actually considering this: You will not be eligible for provincial medical coverage without legal status/being considered a resident of that province. Also god help you if you plan on fleeing to Vancouver or Toronto.", ">>{zapichigo} : How come y'all think you can just up and move here? We are not the frickin USA, you know, we have rules, ya can't just stumble over the border and pitch a tent. Unless you BYOB, then it's all good.", '>>{TrumpOrTrump} : Vancouver and Toronto are North Americas highest ranking cities for quality of life.', ">>{_Underoath_} : Ever been there? It's beautiful, but not safe.", ">>{alaska6} : Man, I've been there a few times and never felt unsafe. Granted, I'm in deeper Mexico usually not near the border towns. Just some of the nicest people in the world.", '>>{noxylophone} : A real batch of patriots, those who would leave.', ">>{dorkofthepolisci} : They're also highly unaffordable and have huge issues with poverty and homelessness. *edit - unless you consider $400k starter condos affordable, then disregard everything I've said*", '>>{ozabelle} : yes i have, never felt unsafe, had no problems. i dont watch fox news tv and i\'m not a "conservative" so i\'m not obliged to be paranoid.', ">>{StandHampton} : But they actually track foreigners in the country on visas, so you have to go through their processes, better start learning Spanish now, because that is a requirement, no lefty liberal immigration policy's there, and no state monies either, support yourself or hit the road http://www.mexperience.com/lifestyle/living-in-mexico/visas-and-immigration/", ">>{alaska6} : Oh I know pretty decent Spanish. But my girlfriend is a dual citizen of the US and Australia, so if we move anywhere it's there. No plans to though, Trump ain't winning.", '>>{TheRealDL} : 1st generation US immigrant from Sud Quebec. Mercí.', '>>{DonkeyKongCountry2} : Im not the one proposing to leave the country if my candidate loses.', '>>{sunstersun} : yeah because middleclass/poor people cant fucking live there.', ">>{_mr_Q_} : What about Hillary? There's so much wrong with Trump, however there's a lot more wrong with Hillary. We should move regardless.", ">>{PMMeYourJobOffer} : We love you guys, but if you elect Trump, we're not moving to the US to bail you out.", ">>{StandHampton} : Aussie, is nice, if you don't mind the taxes, of course they will also track your visa, so you better get married quick", '>>{alaska6} : Yep, lived there for a bit already so totally comfortable with it.', '>>{phadrus56} : Some of us stayed and fought for our country. Others cut and run and then wanted to come back when the war was over.', '>>{quinoakween} : Who says we want all them Yankees here? It should be a requirement before moving that you renounce making fun of Canucks and use "sorry" at least every 7 mins.', '>>{theombudsmen} : Neither are "the liberals" despite what the media tries to shovel into your brain. Theres always fringe drama-queens on the right and left. Just as many idiots claiming they will leave the country if Hillary is elected. Same as it was with Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, etc.', '>>{TrumpOrTrump} : I am sorry but the "huge" issue with poverty you claim is false. Vancouver has a poverty rate around 7% which is about half the poverty rate in America. You can make whatever claims you wish but Vancouver consistently scores among the top 10 cities in the world and has for the last 15 years. That is not say it is without issues.', ">>{dorkofthepolisci} : Perhaps huge is the wrong word, but there is certainly an issue with housing and homelessness. At one point, the DTES was colloquially known as one of the poorest (urban?) postal codes in Canada. *Vancouver has a poverty rate around 7% which is about half the poverty rate in America.* Honest question: What do you mean by poverty rate? Are you talking about people living below the poverty line? Because that doesn't *really* paint an accurate picture, when you're talking about a city that is also ranked as *highly unaffordable*. What about compared to metro areas that are demographically similar or a similar size?", ">>{alaska6} : As I said earlier, I'm not going anywhere cause Trump isn't winning"]]

classify and reply

[">>{EMINEM_4Evah} : So this is the future of smartphones? I'm not gonna like it for the time being, but if Bluetooth quality is improved (which should take some time after this) then I'm ok with it.", '>>{Micasan1} : WH analysis of ObamaCare replacement projects bigger coverage gap than CBO: report', ">>{cabose7} : so when they said they don't trust the CBO i don't think anyone realized they meant the CBO was *too optimistic*", ">>{Carp328} : Thread by thread, Donald Trump is going to pull apart the fabric of our democracy. Mourn, but enjoy the last few moments of freedom that you and your children have. It isn't going to last.", ">>{Saltmineinspector} : Its about voter id. He will find fraud. Certainly not on the scale he says but he will dig up enough to push voter id. This was the game plan to start with. What has happened so far Step one. Make an outrageous claim Step two. in an effort to call his bluff the media asks him to investigate. Step three. Announce an investigation Next steps Step four. Media increases pressure on Trump to start the investigation Step five. investigation launched Step six. The media then sets the bar low by saying he won't find anything. Step seven. Fraud is found not 3 million but maybe a few thousand here and there. Step 8. Voter ID", ">>{2coolfordigg} : OK then let's have a redo on the election .", '>>{banjist} : So why the fuck is the president twittering on about what a great beautiful plan it is?', ">>{WebertDavid} : Apple MacBook Pro review (13-inch, 2016): This is basically the Retina MacBook Air you've always wanted", '>>{Obtuse_Mongoose} : Its like when drinking so much will make anything seem attractive, Trump in essence consumed the entire alcoholic content of both Ireland and Germany in order to make Republicare seem "beautiful."', ">>{Tenacious_Ceeee} : Voter Fraud allegations is about delegitimizing liberal democracy as the best system of government, instead favouring illiberal democracies like the system in Russia. Trump is doing as instructed by his Russian overseers to completely destroy the international system as we've come to know it. America looses its moral capacity to promote liberal democratic values abroad when its highest office publicly delegitimizes it as Trump is doing.", ">>{Shadowfocks} : Cut the price in half and slap linux on it and you've got a usable computer!", '>>{Dom9360} : Downvote this post. This is the second time this site has been linked here and it auto loads a video ad. What a brilliant way to get ad revenue.', '>>{Whipit} : I feel like most of these tech sites and "journalists" have become advertisers. Most actual people feel like Apple has dropped the ball badly lately. But these tech sites... " OMG its the thing you\'ve always wanted!" Not really.', '>>{Shr3kk_Wpg} : I think it is because the poor are less likelyto have photo id, and less likely to vote GOP.', ">>{Trooper27} : Don't shoot the messenger guys. Was just sharing. Personally I don't really care either. Just thought it was interesting that Moto is ditching the headphone jack.", '>>{retsotrembla} : Hell, the Android G1 back in 2007 had no headphone jack, instead it had this weird proprietary USB connector and came with ear buds that plugged in to it.', '>>{illumination_station} : As an American, I would feel much better knowing that the election was fair. Recounts generally do not try to find fraud and therefore never really look for it. This is a much needed and long overdue investigation.', '>>{stevenmcountryman2} : The Dell Precision 5510 is thinner, lighter, more powerful, has a touchscreen, is gorgeous as hell, and $500 less. Why am I being downvoted? [Stop being sheep](http://imgur.com/a/fIpll)', ">>{echoeco} : we could turn it into a win if we demand the end of Gerrymandering, $$$bought, many different voter id laws, and Super Delegate/Electoral college: all deny an individual their one vote. It's not a Democracy until 1 vote = 1 vote.", '>>{Blerglefish} : If the only selling point of the latest MacBook Pro is that it\'s a good replacement for the Air... that\'s a problem. The pro should be a serious, powerful laptop for people who need horsepower. If it had a quad core i7, 32GB and discrete graphics in the 13" model it would be worthy of the Mac book pro name. This thing is just a souped up Air with a hefty price tag.', ">>{OnStilts} : * Disproportionate effect unequivocally meant to suppress predominantly Democratic voting demographics who are less likely to have the required ID to begin with and more burdened in trying to obtain it (i.e., young, minorities) * Negligible to non-existent scope of voter fraud. Measure does not provide the fix for any material problem and instead creates large scale voter suppression and disenfranchisement problems. * Deliberate unequal distribution of infrastructure to implement voter ID laws as they are. Locations for obtaining voter ID's being limited, closed down, inconveniently located, and vexatiously restrictive and limited opening hours in higher population concentration areas, especially Democratic districts. https://www.aclu.org/other/oppose-voter-id-legislation-fact-sheet http://www.salon.com/2012/07/27/fla_republican_we_suppressed_black_votes/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nEXrAmhD9Y http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/glenn-grothman-joins-other-republicans-in-admitting-voter-id-laws-are-about-suppressing-democratic-voters/ https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/17/us/some-republicans-acknowledge-leveraging-voter-id-laws-for-political-gain.html", ">>{DornHoli0} : I'm thoroughly confused. Federal court says it keeps going, and minutes later State Court says it stops. What exactly is happening?", '>>{JusticeMerickGarland} : It comes down to this. Republicans want to stop the recount at any cost. They are so sure that HRC tried to steal the election and voter fraud was out of control, but they want to stop it. That is the first critical point. The only other thing we need to know (and we probably never will) is what the real count is. But those who are willing to recount would like to get closer to the answer.', ">>{ExeterMegaladon} : I'm actually kind of pumped for the switch over as an audiophile. It looks like most of the Lightning compatible headphones are going to be able to draw more power and have built in amp/DAC. Should make simplifying audiophile headphone setups much easier.", ">>{ballb33} : As a Michigander I am totally unsure. They are stopping recounts in precincts where the box counts aren't matching the ballots counts. Some boxes are unsealed and stops a recount too. Lots of issues in Detroit.", '>>{Dildo_Shwaggins100} : eek barba dirkle, someones gonna get laid in college', ">>{SymbioticPatriotic} : It is a confusing miasma of litigation. Which is why Jill's targeting to raise $9.5 million. All those legal bills.", ">>{eggsuckingdog} : You don't actually think he read this analysis right?", '>>{Katzeye} : 54 Million uninsured by 2026. Holy fuck. Vote this to the top, folks. Everyone needs to be made aware of this travesty.', '>>{pheonix200} : Oh Boy! This is going to cost a lot of White House staffers their jobs!', '>>{OnStilts} : Do you not understand the points I just mentioned, or are you just not equipped with the brains or spine to answer them directly?', ">>{echopeus} : Seeing as more than 80% of the USA have DL's one can almost figure a way to get the other 20% one too why should voter fraud be the reason to put voter ID into effect? Why not do it to you know, do it? You could use ID's as the reason to have less of this other infrastructure no?", '>>{altfactsarepeopletoo} : Only one conclusion to draw from this, Trump threw Ryan under the bus. Bye bye AHCA.', '>>{OnStilts} : This is one of those great-on-paper things, but in practice all those partisan powers that be that write and implement the Voter ID Laws deliberately engineer it to have the disproportionate, unequal effect I described above. Everyone would be fine with Voter ID cards simply being distributed gratis to every eligible voter in America but that clearly is not how these plans manifest in reality.', '>>{s0lstice11} : What are Republicans so afraid about that they want to stop the recount? Serious question, serious answer please.', ">>{TheAmazingAsshole2} : If the recount isn't done before December 13th there's a chance the state's electoral votes wouldn't count. I doubt there'd be as much pushback had the recount been requested a few days after the election instead of at literally the last possible moment.", '>>{tinytankzz} : There is a date to submit it by and they submitted it though right?', '>>{stevenmcountryman2} : I quote dell precisions for a living. I know what I said', ">>{Lanza21} : I'm all for it. The fewer ports the better. Though Apple likely using Lightning seems to be just as bad as having the standard jack. I'd rather see a USB-C iPhone w/o a headphone jack than Lightning.", ">>{SteppingSplash} : Plenty of phones did that back in the day. Now people are so accustomed to their headphone jack that they just won't let go and let technology progress.", ">>{PangurtheWhite} : Pass. Seriously, pass. On any smartphone without a headphone jack. I'm not fucking rich, I can't just switch to an all bluetooth life.", '>>{bunglejerry} : This is the largest coverage gap ever. Period. - Sean Spicer', ">>{classenmindy} : I didn't know I wanted it to be more expensive", ">>{echopeus} : if in fact we are all equal why would this not be the thing to strive for? In reality this should be done, but its not... As much as I'd like this to stop voter fraud I'd want this measure put in place to know that my Voted was Tallied at the end of the day.", '>>{talones} : yep, a lot of manufacturers will be making simple lightning to 3.5mm trrs adapters that have built in DACs also so you can use your old headphones. Also those headphones that have a custom eq built into the inline DAC are fucking awesome. Been waiting for a custom eq on the iphone for YEARS.', ">>{sanjugo} : Not a Mac/Apple fan boy? lol /u/stevenmcountryman2/ does have a point and he's not wrong (Apple is indeed $500 more expensive give and take). Apple overcharges on additional parts to make money, it's just normal business practice for a lot of companies not just Apple. Because of this most people use loopholes to getting discounts but this option isn't available to just everyone. And finally, that Dell has something that trumps over anything Apple has right now...touchscreen. This is 2016, not 2006. If you claim to be an innovative company then be like one.", '>>{FullClockworkOddessy} : No. He just thinks the idea of poor people dying is beautiful.', '>>{talones} : yep, the blackjack I had was a totally proprietary port (not just samsung proprietary, im talking samsung blackjack proprietary) That you had to buy a separate adapter for if you wanted to use your own headphones.', ">>{Time4Red} : No, he thinks the idea of people complaining about Healthcare is more palatable than people complaining about Russia. He doesn't give a shit about healthcare.", '>>{DarKbaldness} : >Most actual people = /r/apple My step dad is extremely excited to get a new 15" MacBook Pro and he has never even heard of Reddit I should note, his current workstation is a 2009 MacBook Pro hooked up to a couple monitors and a G5 hooked up to a couple monitors', ">>{andyster} : They've not been particularly clear about it in the naming conventions but the MacBook Pro with Escape key is lower power than the MBP with touch strip. The MacBook Escape which is being reviewed is really aimed at people who just wanted a 13 inch Air w/ Retina or a MacBook Retina with another port. The MacBook Pro Touch is more of a traditional pro machine.", ">>{andyster} : I really don't know what I'd end up getting if my Air 11 were ever stolen or breaks. There's nothing that feels like a real clear upgrade, especially in the ~1,000 dollar price range. Maybe I'd end up with a fully loaded iPad, or this or a MBr. Moving to Windows would be a really painful experience, especially losing iMessage as it's the only thing that can reliably reach me at work since social networks are blocked on the wifi and the cell signal is bad. None of the Apple solutions seem like a clear win at this point, I just have to hope my MBA lasts until the dongle life seems less painful and hopefully they can move the prices back down as new designs tend to slowly go down market a bit.", '>>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : *"Virtually impossible to have 14 million people lose coverage. It needs to be at least... three times bigger than this."*', '>>{TheAmazingAsshole2} : Yes, they waited til the very last moment to submit it in all three states.', '>>{ruiner8850} : They don\'t want everyone to have healthcare period. Even if magically it could be paid for 100% for free they don\'t want it because they think that it will hurt them. They talk about "rationing" all the time and they don\'t want to have to wait for poor people. These people simply believe that they are better than them and "those people" don\'t deserve to be healthy.', ">>{OnStilts} : So ostensibly wanting free equally and conveniently distributed voter ID (even if we do want to say it's 'just because' rather than a cost that should be demonstrably justified) means we have to capitulate to Republicans' disingenuous exploitation of the issue and can't call out partisan voter id laws that exact unequal burden and suppress voters along brazenly partisan lines?", '>>{talones} : Technically Lightning is still a touch slimmer, so I doubt they would go full USB-C until thick phones start becoming popular.', '>>{athtung} : How does he feel about getting dongles just to hook up to the external display?', '>>{tinytankzz} : Well before the deadline is before the deadline plain and simple.', '>>{medium_grey} : The base 13" MBP has the highest sticker shock of the bunch. You can order the OLED touchbar version with a 2.9ghz processor for the same cost as the non-OLED touchbar version with a 2.4ghz processor. Total ripoff.', '>>{SteppingSplash} : I remember the days of having a phone that could utilize any old 3.5mm to 1.75mm (?) adapter. It felt so cool to be able to use my *real* headphones with my *phone*.', ">>{Geaux} : The President needs to come out and pan the plan, retracting his support. He needs to challenge the Republicans on this, so people think he's actually involved.", ">>{echopeus} : free equality, there is no such thing. Also, Mexico and Canada have voter ID laws as does India... They all have much poorer people and India has a much larger population. There is no real reason to not have Voter ID, unless you make this about Party bullshit like what you're bringing to the table.", ">>{oahut} : How else will Russia cripple the US for 50-100 years? This billionaire tax break called the AHCA will kill more Americans than Vietnam and the two Iraq Wars combined. For 10's of millions of Rubles -- which isn't a lot, Trump will sentence 100's of thousands of Americans to death before single payer will inevitably be enacted. We should build a memorial wall for those who die from the AHCA.", ">>{box-art} : I listen to a lot of music on my phone. I have to be able to listen to music if my phone has power, I don't want to be unable to listen to music because my headphones ran out of juice. And also, wireless headphones are expensive and I don't really have that kind of money, especially after spending hundreds on the phone itself.", ">>{TheAmazingAsshole2} : Well of course, after the deadline means they'd reject the request. You know that isn't the point", ">>{OnStilts} : What *I'm* bringing to the table? You just dismiss the identifying of party bullshit as, itself, party bullshit. How convenient and cowardly. Regarding the relative state of voter id requirements in different places, Canada for example *doesn't* in fact have anything close to the suppressive Voter ID laws that the Republicans specifically and other people like you are gunning for and imposing all over the US already. In Canada, voter registration is much more proactive and centralized. Elections Canada provides online voter registration, they will also go door to door and they provide registration confirmation cards to everyone. At the polls voters have a number of options for identifying themselves, only one of which involves any photo ID, and none of them involve some dedicated Voter ID card. You pretended you didn't know what was wrong with the Voter ID laws and then, when you are told, just dismiss all of it out of hand rather than tackling the inconvenient facts, tipping your hand as a wholly partisan proponent.", ">>{echopeus} : whats cowardly is never wanting to do the Right thing especially if its the other side thats doing it - That my friend is cowardly So who says we can't create a voting like canada, why leave that off the table? there are no issues with voter ID, as is proven by Countries North and South of us and all over the world... I don't pretend anything, I think once reality sets in that Voter ID needs to happen logical solutions are everywhere. I've said this in other Posts.", '>>{DarKbaldness} : He already uses dongles AFAIK. Might even be a docking station kind of thing', ">>{tinytankzz} : I don't actually. What is the point of saying they waited till the last minute? If they did it in time then there is no issue other than the pushback causing the EC votes to not count or the date being set to late. Neither of which can be pinned on those requesting the recount.", '>>{HarrisonGourd} : Most "actual" people haven\'t even seen or tried it, so their opinion may not be set in stone. Remember the initial reaction to the first iPad?', ">>{OnStilts} : Nope. Ignoring the facts of partisan unequal implementation and effect, and ignoring the legal principle of proportionality is still what's cowardly.", ">>{Rahul_the_ghoul} : I don't know about you but I never wanted a MacBook Air that starts at 2 grand, is bigger and heavier, has no USB ports, no MagSafe, and doesn't come in an 11 inch version.", ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : You're having the exact same debate I had a little bit ago. Almost word for word. That's funny. I was saying what you are saying, and the person I was talking to was saying what the person you are talking to is saying.", '>>{echopeus} : ooh big words that together make little sense, lol... You can believe what you want I guess, but concerning that this isn\'t somehow fixable is by far what is most cowardly... its sticking your fingers in your ears and chanting "la la la la" really loud cowardly... yes I\'m comparing you to a child.', '>>{m104} : It starts at $1500, is the same weight as the 13" air, and has usb c. What are you talking about?', '>>{slartibartfastr} : Really don\'t understand what you mean. They have made an incredibly powerful, light, durable laptop with great battery and a great screen. And it has the advance of having the best PC OS in the world. It will receive updates for longer than the laptop will last. So comparing to the competition. It\'s by far the best choice for many people out there. Were you expecting these sites to say "oh don\'t get this, get a high end Dell"? No. because they suck. So reviewing this machine in the context of actual people walking into stores to buy a new machine, you can only say that it\'s bloody brilliant.', '>>{OnStilts} : Continued denial and projection... still utterly incapable of engaging with the substance. SAD', '>>{snugglebutt} : What makes you think he actually read the plan?', ">>{ClebschGordan} : Well let Apple know and I'm sure they'll cancel their plans when they find out it doesn't work for you.", '>>{ClebschGordan} : You can get decent Bluetooth headphones for under $35 and very good ones for less than $100. Edit: why would you down vote me for pointing out that Bluetooth headphone prices are much better nowadays?', '>>{slartibartfastr} : I think it\'s smaller than the 13" too if I remember correctly.', ">>{box-art} : Lots of people have invested good money on headphones that they did a lot of research on. There's nothing wrong with the 3.5mm jack, a lot of people prefer wired over wireless due to quality.", ">>{mattchoo86} : If this was a common feature back in the day that was removed to make room for more of an open standard, the wouldn't going *back* to that same business model be more along the lines of regress?", '>>{echopeus} : so Canada can do it, Mexico can do it, India can do it, Brazil can do it, Germany can do it, Netherlands can do it... fuck Switzerland can do it.. Where exactly is your substance? please explain to me', ">>{Marino4K} : The only thing I dislike about losing the headphone jack is the fact that my car doesn't have bluetooth, however I religiously use the jack for my aux cable to still be able to listen to things.", '>>{PangurtheWhite} : I buy headphones for <$10. You can\'t just presumptuously tell someone "oh they\'re cheap, merely triple-10x what you\'re paying now!" That\'s fucking expensive. And then they break and you buy another pair. Suddenly it\'s completely out of control, just for headphones that should be a couple of bucks. Edit: absurd bipolar down voting which can only be interpreted as class-based shaming. "You can\'t afford cheaply made yet unnecessarily expensive Bluetooth headphones even though they\'re a mere several **times** what you\'re used to paying? DOWNVOTE!!" Eat a dick.', ">>{slartibartfastr} : Data has shown that people with touch screen laptops don't use them. At all. And if you think apple is a rip off and dell isn't then you are in a dream world. Apple offer world class support. They provide updates that usually outlast the machines and their products are proven to be built to the highest standards. Dell offer the most hideous support. They use cheap off the shelf parts and their machines are made to the lowest standards they can get away with. People buy apple not because they innovate. They don't buy them because they are sheep. They buy them because apple has shown time and time again that their products are the best. And more often than not, the outlay far outweigh the overall cost in comparison to others.", ">>{Dinkdinkdata} : Neither is trying to innovate by removing the headphone jack. They're simply space. Apple already has lightning port headphones, so the innovation has already happened if you want to call it that.", ">>{Dinkdinkdata} : For me I don't want to the Bluetooth headphones, however the bigger issue is my car has a 3.5mm jack. No Bluetooth in my factory radio. Now I'm stuck with a dongle and what if I want to charge while listening which I do often? Just another mess of dongles", ">>{sanjugo} : Dell used to be cheap and nasty but they've come a long way. I got a Dell XPS for an excellent deal ($650) and it was okay. To be fair, US brands like Dell, HP have come a long way. I'm currently using a HP Spectre x360 and for $900 it is the best laptop I've ever owned. I've been in the technology,IT and educational space all my life and unfortunately for you I have never owned a single Apple product for a number of reasons that still remains today: - overpriced - technologically behind - restrictive I was already using an MP3/AVI phone, I didn't need an iPod or an iPhone. I already had a 1080p screen on my laptops, I didn't need to wait for years for Apple to make one. I already had a touchscreen on my laptops, again I didn't need to wait for Apple to make a touchscreen laptop. So in essence, why do I or anyone else need to wait for Apple for anything?", '>>{Mister_Kurtz} : How dare Motorola do this without announcing it for a year prior.', '>>{lolstebbo} : [You put the dongle on the car side of the equation](https://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&page=1&rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3Acar%20bluetooth%20aux). Still a mess of dongles, but slightly less cumbersome.', ">>{slartibartfastr} : >Apple product for a number of reasons that still remains today: - overpriced - technologically behind - restrictive Utter nonsense >I was already using an MP3/AVI phone, I didn't need an iPod or an iPhone. So was I. And it sucked. >I already had a 1080p screen on my laptops, I didn't need to wait for years for Apple to make one. You also didn't get any battery life. >I already had a touchscreen on my laptops, again I didn't need to wait for Apple to make a touchscreen laptop. Apple don't and won't make a touchscreen laptop. And the data shows that people who have them don't actually use them. >So in essence, why do I or anyone else need to wait for Apple for anything? I could list a few things we all use most days that apple made popular. But I think it may go over your head.", ">>{sanjugo} : lol Like in all your posts, your counters are all flash and no substance. But you're smart because you know you are way out of your league debating with me.", ">>{gerwen} : You should consider getting a head unit that does bluetooth. When it's a good implementation, it's so very nice to have. Hop in the car with phone in pocket, car stereo continues to play whatever you were listening to last automatically, whether it's music/podcast/video/whatever. Plus you can do hands free calling and such without taking your phone out. Also you can push a button to invoke Siri.", '>>{slartibartfastr} : Sorry I must of offended you kid. I was simply stating that you are wrong. Which you are.', '>>{sanjugo} : Haha now the "you\'re the kid" line. Seriously is this the best you can do? Your credibility here is nothing but an Apple troll because you have no counter at all, but I guess this is all Apple fanboys can do for now lol', '>>{SteppingSplash} : An adapter would really just be a crutch to smooth the progressive transition to future technology. When phones inevitability rid themselves of the old technology of the 3.5mm jack and the market shifts toward making USB Type C and/or Bluetooth headphones a standard, an adapter will be less and less necessary. This happens all the time with technology. Many people didn\'t want to buy new peripherals when PS/2 was phased out in lieu of the USB standard that was better in damn near every way, but it eventually happened, and the transition was definitely for the better. It\'s human nature to cling to what you love and are used to and sneer at the thought of change. The old quote from Henry Ford always comes to mind: "If I would have asked my customers what they would have preferred, they would have told me that they wanted a faster horse" or something to that extent. I foresee the standard to be Bluetooth headphones that still connect to your phone via USB-C, but have a detachable cable so you can use them wirelessly if you do so choose. The USB-C standard allows charging both ways, so you literally will be able to charge your headphones by plugging them into your phone, and you can listen to them wired without using the battery in the headphones at all.', '>>{Marino4K} : At some point in the next year, will probably get a newer car with bluetooth built in so trying to not invest in a new unit.', ">>{technicalityNDBO} : I'm sure there will be little bluetooth adapters with a headphone jack to accommodate those who can't cut the cord.", '>>{slartibartfastr} : Dude talks about credibility on an anonymous discussion site famous for cat memes. Get outside, get some fresh air and wake up, kid.', '>>{Trooper27} : We can only hope lol. Still curious as to what Apple is going (or not going) to do regarding this.', ">>{tperelli} : I guess Bluetooth 5 is supposed to be announce *very* soon and it's lightyears better than Bluetooth 4.0 so that should be cool.", ">>{tperelli} : There will never be Apple created lightning headphones. They'd only work on iDevices. What about Macs and everything else?", ">>{goodguy2016} : I'm usually disappointed when it comes to debates like this when it's so one sided.", ">>{goodguy2016} : Since I bought my acer laptop with touchscreen I have never looked back, and I'm not sure if you're aware but even monitors have touchscreens now. So much more fun to use than a touchpad or a mouse.", ">>{slartibartfastr} : I'm happy for you. The user data shows that most people do not use the touch screen on laptops that have touch screens. Which is why we are seeing less touch screen laptops.", '>>{christofermario} : I hope so, I also hope someone comes out with good Bluetooth earbuds that stay in the ear for less than $150 haha.', '>>{xoFoxtail} : The front of that is ugly. Particularly around the home button.', ">>{Trooper27} : Agreed. Don't know what they were thinking when this phone was designed.", '>>{philistineinquisitor} : Stupid ass title. Plenty of ultra thin phones already killed the headphone jack these last few years.', ">>{ClebschGordan} : Why are you telling me this? I'm just pointing out to the guy that said money was the problem that Bluetooth headphones aren't the ridiculously expensive product they once were. But thanks for telling me personal information about you that I didn't ask for and thanks everybody for the down votes for making a simple observation.", '>>{ClebschGordan} : Yes. I got Jaybird Bluebud X2 and Jabra Revo headphones each for less than $100.', '>>{pieceofrice} : I feel the same way here too. I actually bought a tablet and then realised that a laptop with a touchscreen was so much better.', ">>{ClebschGordan} : And lots of people spent a lot of money on record collections before the record player was replaced. The whole world can't come to a screeching halt because some guy somewhere bought some headphones.", ">>{ExeterMegaladon} : Who said anything about Apple created? It's not like an audiophile would be buying Apple headphones anyway.", ">>{tperelli} : That's been the rumor since it's been rumored that Apple will drop the headphone jack, which most likely won't happen", ">>{Marino4K} : I'm in the US. Bluetooth adapter? I had never heard of them until now, may have to invest in one", ">>{negroiso} : These days, it's not even worth replacing the head unit. I end up having to spend more in bypass and connection adapters than the head unit often costs. Not only that but now the design of these dashboards makes anything but oem look like shit. I saw pioneer or alpine had a complete setup for a dvd/navy for my system to rep,ace the oem housing. It was around 2500$ by the time you bought everything. Surprising that the dvd nav unit with all its bells and whistles was the cheapest part of the entire package.", ">>{gerwen} : Crutchfield.com has an extensive database on what fits in what with and without extra work, and sells the adapters and plastic dash pieces alongside the head units for free or reasonable cost. Granted I'm generally doing it in 5+ year old cars so your experience may be more true than I know about.", ">>{sanjugo} : It is difficult to hold and type on a tablet as many people have experienced so having something to hold up the touchscreen on a table, sofa or while lying in bed is incredibly useful. Nothing can ever match the speed, intuition and accuracy of the physical keyboard, and nothing can ever match the screen gesturing (ie. scroll and zoom), intuition and incredibly flexibility of the touchscreen. Combining the two is the logical and smarter thing to do because you also get better battery life, faster processors and better storage. I love the fact that I can use my hybrid laptop/tablet in virtually any situation like in bed, on the table and flat down with the screen up. Nearly every single devices with a screen now uses touchscreen gesturing including watches, phones, tvs, monitors, led/oled readouts on electrical appliances etc etc. People like /u/slartibartfastr/ don't understand technology at all and can never see past the outdated touchpad lol", ">>{daemonchile} : Lordy. I think I've just rocked your world.", ">>{pieceofrice} : This is so strange. I'm seeing a lot more people using laptops with touchscreens than tablets now. It's so much easier typing and gesturing on screen than using a standalone tablet (tiring while holding) or a touchpad (really annoying to use).", ">>{sanjugo} : waah waah waah is the best you can do, like I said you're way out of your league debating in big topics like these.", '>>{slartibartfastr} : You know what I do when my kids act like you?', '>>{goodguy2016} : yeah I wonder what happened to that guy, seems like he had no counters :-p']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{EMINEM_4Evah} : So this is the future of smartphones? I'm not gonna like it for the time being, but if Bluetooth quality is improved (which should take some time after this) then I'm ok with it.", '>>{Dom9360} : Downvote this post. This is the second time this site has been linked here and it auto loads a video ad. What a brilliant way to get ad revenue.', ">>{Trooper27} : Don't shoot the messenger guys. Was just sharing. Personally I don't really care either. Just thought it was interesting that Moto is ditching the headphone jack.", '>>{retsotrembla} : Hell, the Android G1 back in 2007 had no headphone jack, instead it had this weird proprietary USB connector and came with ear buds that plugged in to it.', ">>{ExeterMegaladon} : I'm actually kind of pumped for the switch over as an audiophile. It looks like most of the Lightning compatible headphones are going to be able to draw more power and have built in amp/DAC. Should make simplifying audiophile headphone setups much easier.", ">>{Lanza21} : I'm all for it. The fewer ports the better. Though Apple likely using Lightning seems to be just as bad as having the standard jack. I'd rather see a USB-C iPhone w/o a headphone jack than Lightning.", ">>{SteppingSplash} : Plenty of phones did that back in the day. Now people are so accustomed to their headphone jack that they just won't let go and let technology progress.", ">>{PangurtheWhite} : Pass. Seriously, pass. On any smartphone without a headphone jack. I'm not fucking rich, I can't just switch to an all bluetooth life.", '>>{talones} : yep, a lot of manufacturers will be making simple lightning to 3.5mm trrs adapters that have built in DACs also so you can use your old headphones. Also those headphones that have a custom eq built into the inline DAC are fucking awesome. Been waiting for a custom eq on the iphone for YEARS.', '>>{talones} : yep, the blackjack I had was a totally proprietary port (not just samsung proprietary, im talking samsung blackjack proprietary) That you had to buy a separate adapter for if you wanted to use your own headphones.', '>>{talones} : Technically Lightning is still a touch slimmer, so I doubt they would go full USB-C until thick phones start becoming popular.', '>>{SteppingSplash} : I remember the days of having a phone that could utilize any old 3.5mm to 1.75mm (?) adapter. It felt so cool to be able to use my *real* headphones with my *phone*.', ">>{box-art} : I listen to a lot of music on my phone. I have to be able to listen to music if my phone has power, I don't want to be unable to listen to music because my headphones ran out of juice. And also, wireless headphones are expensive and I don't really have that kind of money, especially after spending hundreds on the phone itself.", ">>{ClebschGordan} : Well let Apple know and I'm sure they'll cancel their plans when they find out it doesn't work for you.", '>>{ClebschGordan} : You can get decent Bluetooth headphones for under $35 and very good ones for less than $100. Edit: why would you down vote me for pointing out that Bluetooth headphone prices are much better nowadays?', ">>{box-art} : Lots of people have invested good money on headphones that they did a lot of research on. There's nothing wrong with the 3.5mm jack, a lot of people prefer wired over wireless due to quality.", ">>{mattchoo86} : If this was a common feature back in the day that was removed to make room for more of an open standard, the wouldn't going *back* to that same business model be more along the lines of regress?", ">>{Marino4K} : The only thing I dislike about losing the headphone jack is the fact that my car doesn't have bluetooth, however I religiously use the jack for my aux cable to still be able to listen to things.", '>>{PangurtheWhite} : I buy headphones for <$10. You can\'t just presumptuously tell someone "oh they\'re cheap, merely triple-10x what you\'re paying now!" That\'s fucking expensive. And then they break and you buy another pair. Suddenly it\'s completely out of control, just for headphones that should be a couple of bucks. Edit: absurd bipolar down voting which can only be interpreted as class-based shaming. "You can\'t afford cheaply made yet unnecessarily expensive Bluetooth headphones even though they\'re a mere several **times** what you\'re used to paying? DOWNVOTE!!" Eat a dick.', ">>{Dinkdinkdata} : Neither is trying to innovate by removing the headphone jack. They're simply space. Apple already has lightning port headphones, so the innovation has already happened if you want to call it that.", ">>{Dinkdinkdata} : For me I don't want to the Bluetooth headphones, however the bigger issue is my car has a 3.5mm jack. No Bluetooth in my factory radio. Now I'm stuck with a dongle and what if I want to charge while listening which I do often? Just another mess of dongles", '>>{Mister_Kurtz} : How dare Motorola do this without announcing it for a year prior.', '>>{lolstebbo} : [You put the dongle on the car side of the equation](https://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&page=1&rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3Acar%20bluetooth%20aux). Still a mess of dongles, but slightly less cumbersome.', ">>{gerwen} : You should consider getting a head unit that does bluetooth. When it's a good implementation, it's so very nice to have. Hop in the car with phone in pocket, car stereo continues to play whatever you were listening to last automatically, whether it's music/podcast/video/whatever. Plus you can do hands free calling and such without taking your phone out. Also you can push a button to invoke Siri.", '>>{SteppingSplash} : An adapter would really just be a crutch to smooth the progressive transition to future technology. When phones inevitability rid themselves of the old technology of the 3.5mm jack and the market shifts toward making USB Type C and/or Bluetooth headphones a standard, an adapter will be less and less necessary. This happens all the time with technology. Many people didn\'t want to buy new peripherals when PS/2 was phased out in lieu of the USB standard that was better in damn near every way, but it eventually happened, and the transition was definitely for the better. It\'s human nature to cling to what you love and are used to and sneer at the thought of change. The old quote from Henry Ford always comes to mind: "If I would have asked my customers what they would have preferred, they would have told me that they wanted a faster horse" or something to that extent. I foresee the standard to be Bluetooth headphones that still connect to your phone via USB-C, but have a detachable cable so you can use them wirelessly if you do so choose. The USB-C standard allows charging both ways, so you literally will be able to charge your headphones by plugging them into your phone, and you can listen to them wired without using the battery in the headphones at all.', '>>{Marino4K} : At some point in the next year, will probably get a newer car with bluetooth built in so trying to not invest in a new unit.', ">>{technicalityNDBO} : I'm sure there will be little bluetooth adapters with a headphone jack to accommodate those who can't cut the cord.", '>>{Trooper27} : We can only hope lol. Still curious as to what Apple is going (or not going) to do regarding this.', ">>{tperelli} : I guess Bluetooth 5 is supposed to be announce *very* soon and it's lightyears better than Bluetooth 4.0 so that should be cool.", ">>{tperelli} : There will never be Apple created lightning headphones. They'd only work on iDevices. What about Macs and everything else?", '>>{christofermario} : I hope so, I also hope someone comes out with good Bluetooth earbuds that stay in the ear for less than $150 haha.', '>>{xoFoxtail} : The front of that is ugly. Particularly around the home button.', ">>{Trooper27} : Agreed. Don't know what they were thinking when this phone was designed.", '>>{philistineinquisitor} : Stupid ass title. Plenty of ultra thin phones already killed the headphone jack these last few years.', ">>{ClebschGordan} : Why are you telling me this? I'm just pointing out to the guy that said money was the problem that Bluetooth headphones aren't the ridiculously expensive product they once were. But thanks for telling me personal information about you that I didn't ask for and thanks everybody for the down votes for making a simple observation.", '>>{ClebschGordan} : Yes. I got Jaybird Bluebud X2 and Jabra Revo headphones each for less than $100.', ">>{ClebschGordan} : And lots of people spent a lot of money on record collections before the record player was replaced. The whole world can't come to a screeching halt because some guy somewhere bought some headphones.", ">>{ExeterMegaladon} : Who said anything about Apple created? It's not like an audiophile would be buying Apple headphones anyway.", ">>{tperelli} : That's been the rumor since it's been rumored that Apple will drop the headphone jack, which most likely won't happen", ">>{Marino4K} : I'm in the US. Bluetooth adapter? I had never heard of them until now, may have to invest in one", ">>{negroiso} : These days, it's not even worth replacing the head unit. I end up having to spend more in bypass and connection adapters than the head unit often costs. Not only that but now the design of these dashboards makes anything but oem look like shit. I saw pioneer or alpine had a complete setup for a dvd/navy for my system to rep,ace the oem housing. It was around 2500$ by the time you bought everything. Surprising that the dvd nav unit with all its bells and whistles was the cheapest part of the entire package.", ">>{gerwen} : Crutchfield.com has an extensive database on what fits in what with and without extra work, and sells the adapters and plastic dash pieces alongside the head units for free or reasonable cost. Granted I'm generally doing it in 5+ year old cars so your experience may be more true than I know about.", ">>{daemonchile} : Lordy. I think I've just rocked your world."], [">>{WebertDavid} : Apple MacBook Pro review (13-inch, 2016): This is basically the Retina MacBook Air you've always wanted", ">>{Shadowfocks} : Cut the price in half and slap linux on it and you've got a usable computer!", '>>{Whipit} : I feel like most of these tech sites and "journalists" have become advertisers. Most actual people feel like Apple has dropped the ball badly lately. But these tech sites... " OMG its the thing you\'ve always wanted!" Not really.', '>>{stevenmcountryman2} : The Dell Precision 5510 is thinner, lighter, more powerful, has a touchscreen, is gorgeous as hell, and $500 less. Why am I being downvoted? [Stop being sheep](http://imgur.com/a/fIpll)', '>>{Blerglefish} : If the only selling point of the latest MacBook Pro is that it\'s a good replacement for the Air... that\'s a problem. The pro should be a serious, powerful laptop for people who need horsepower. If it had a quad core i7, 32GB and discrete graphics in the 13" model it would be worthy of the Mac book pro name. This thing is just a souped up Air with a hefty price tag.', '>>{stevenmcountryman2} : I quote dell precisions for a living. I know what I said', ">>{classenmindy} : I didn't know I wanted it to be more expensive", ">>{sanjugo} : Not a Mac/Apple fan boy? lol /u/stevenmcountryman2/ does have a point and he's not wrong (Apple is indeed $500 more expensive give and take). Apple overcharges on additional parts to make money, it's just normal business practice for a lot of companies not just Apple. Because of this most people use loopholes to getting discounts but this option isn't available to just everyone. And finally, that Dell has something that trumps over anything Apple has right now...touchscreen. This is 2016, not 2006. If you claim to be an innovative company then be like one.", '>>{DarKbaldness} : >Most actual people = /r/apple My step dad is extremely excited to get a new 15" MacBook Pro and he has never even heard of Reddit I should note, his current workstation is a 2009 MacBook Pro hooked up to a couple monitors and a G5 hooked up to a couple monitors', ">>{andyster} : They've not been particularly clear about it in the naming conventions but the MacBook Pro with Escape key is lower power than the MBP with touch strip. The MacBook Escape which is being reviewed is really aimed at people who just wanted a 13 inch Air w/ Retina or a MacBook Retina with another port. The MacBook Pro Touch is more of a traditional pro machine.", ">>{andyster} : I really don't know what I'd end up getting if my Air 11 were ever stolen or breaks. There's nothing that feels like a real clear upgrade, especially in the ~1,000 dollar price range. Maybe I'd end up with a fully loaded iPad, or this or a MBr. Moving to Windows would be a really painful experience, especially losing iMessage as it's the only thing that can reliably reach me at work since social networks are blocked on the wifi and the cell signal is bad. None of the Apple solutions seem like a clear win at this point, I just have to hope my MBA lasts until the dongle life seems less painful and hopefully they can move the prices back down as new designs tend to slowly go down market a bit.", '>>{athtung} : How does he feel about getting dongles just to hook up to the external display?', '>>{medium_grey} : The base 13" MBP has the highest sticker shock of the bunch. You can order the OLED touchbar version with a 2.9ghz processor for the same cost as the non-OLED touchbar version with a 2.4ghz processor. Total ripoff.', '>>{DarKbaldness} : He already uses dongles AFAIK. Might even be a docking station kind of thing', '>>{HarrisonGourd} : Most "actual" people haven\'t even seen or tried it, so their opinion may not be set in stone. Remember the initial reaction to the first iPad?', ">>{Rahul_the_ghoul} : I don't know about you but I never wanted a MacBook Air that starts at 2 grand, is bigger and heavier, has no USB ports, no MagSafe, and doesn't come in an 11 inch version.", '>>{m104} : It starts at $1500, is the same weight as the 13" air, and has usb c. What are you talking about?', '>>{slartibartfastr} : Really don\'t understand what you mean. They have made an incredibly powerful, light, durable laptop with great battery and a great screen. And it has the advance of having the best PC OS in the world. It will receive updates for longer than the laptop will last. So comparing to the competition. It\'s by far the best choice for many people out there. Were you expecting these sites to say "oh don\'t get this, get a high end Dell"? No. because they suck. So reviewing this machine in the context of actual people walking into stores to buy a new machine, you can only say that it\'s bloody brilliant.', '>>{slartibartfastr} : I think it\'s smaller than the 13" too if I remember correctly.', ">>{slartibartfastr} : Data has shown that people with touch screen laptops don't use them. At all. And if you think apple is a rip off and dell isn't then you are in a dream world. Apple offer world class support. They provide updates that usually outlast the machines and their products are proven to be built to the highest standards. Dell offer the most hideous support. They use cheap off the shelf parts and their machines are made to the lowest standards they can get away with. People buy apple not because they innovate. They don't buy them because they are sheep. They buy them because apple has shown time and time again that their products are the best. And more often than not, the outlay far outweigh the overall cost in comparison to others.", ">>{sanjugo} : Dell used to be cheap and nasty but they've come a long way. I got a Dell XPS for an excellent deal ($650) and it was okay. To be fair, US brands like Dell, HP have come a long way. I'm currently using a HP Spectre x360 and for $900 it is the best laptop I've ever owned. I've been in the technology,IT and educational space all my life and unfortunately for you I have never owned a single Apple product for a number of reasons that still remains today: - overpriced - technologically behind - restrictive I was already using an MP3/AVI phone, I didn't need an iPod or an iPhone. I already had a 1080p screen on my laptops, I didn't need to wait for years for Apple to make one. I already had a touchscreen on my laptops, again I didn't need to wait for Apple to make a touchscreen laptop. So in essence, why do I or anyone else need to wait for Apple for anything?", ">>{slartibartfastr} : >Apple product for a number of reasons that still remains today: - overpriced - technologically behind - restrictive Utter nonsense >I was already using an MP3/AVI phone, I didn't need an iPod or an iPhone. So was I. And it sucked. >I already had a 1080p screen on my laptops, I didn't need to wait for years for Apple to make one. You also didn't get any battery life. >I already had a touchscreen on my laptops, again I didn't need to wait for Apple to make a touchscreen laptop. Apple don't and won't make a touchscreen laptop. And the data shows that people who have them don't actually use them. >So in essence, why do I or anyone else need to wait for Apple for anything? I could list a few things we all use most days that apple made popular. But I think it may go over your head.", ">>{sanjugo} : lol Like in all your posts, your counters are all flash and no substance. But you're smart because you know you are way out of your league debating with me.", '>>{slartibartfastr} : Sorry I must of offended you kid. I was simply stating that you are wrong. Which you are.', '>>{sanjugo} : Haha now the "you\'re the kid" line. Seriously is this the best you can do? Your credibility here is nothing but an Apple troll because you have no counter at all, but I guess this is all Apple fanboys can do for now lol', '>>{slartibartfastr} : Dude talks about credibility on an anonymous discussion site famous for cat memes. Get outside, get some fresh air and wake up, kid.', ">>{goodguy2016} : I'm usually disappointed when it comes to debates like this when it's so one sided.", ">>{goodguy2016} : Since I bought my acer laptop with touchscreen I have never looked back, and I'm not sure if you're aware but even monitors have touchscreens now. So much more fun to use than a touchpad or a mouse.", ">>{slartibartfastr} : I'm happy for you. The user data shows that most people do not use the touch screen on laptops that have touch screens. Which is why we are seeing less touch screen laptops.", '>>{pieceofrice} : I feel the same way here too. I actually bought a tablet and then realised that a laptop with a touchscreen was so much better.', ">>{sanjugo} : It is difficult to hold and type on a tablet as many people have experienced so having something to hold up the touchscreen on a table, sofa or while lying in bed is incredibly useful. Nothing can ever match the speed, intuition and accuracy of the physical keyboard, and nothing can ever match the screen gesturing (ie. scroll and zoom), intuition and incredibly flexibility of the touchscreen. Combining the two is the logical and smarter thing to do because you also get better battery life, faster processors and better storage. I love the fact that I can use my hybrid laptop/tablet in virtually any situation like in bed, on the table and flat down with the screen up. Nearly every single devices with a screen now uses touchscreen gesturing including watches, phones, tvs, monitors, led/oled readouts on electrical appliances etc etc. People like /u/slartibartfastr/ don't understand technology at all and can never see past the outdated touchpad lol", ">>{pieceofrice} : This is so strange. I'm seeing a lot more people using laptops with touchscreens than tablets now. It's so much easier typing and gesturing on screen than using a standalone tablet (tiring while holding) or a touchpad (really annoying to use).", ">>{sanjugo} : waah waah waah is the best you can do, like I said you're way out of your league debating in big topics like these.", '>>{slartibartfastr} : You know what I do when my kids act like you?', '>>{goodguy2016} : yeah I wonder what happened to that guy, seems like he had no counters :-p'], [">>{Carp328} : Thread by thread, Donald Trump is going to pull apart the fabric of our democracy. Mourn, but enjoy the last few moments of freedom that you and your children have. It isn't going to last.", ">>{Saltmineinspector} : Its about voter id. He will find fraud. Certainly not on the scale he says but he will dig up enough to push voter id. This was the game plan to start with. What has happened so far Step one. Make an outrageous claim Step two. in an effort to call his bluff the media asks him to investigate. Step three. Announce an investigation Next steps Step four. Media increases pressure on Trump to start the investigation Step five. investigation launched Step six. The media then sets the bar low by saying he won't find anything. Step seven. Fraud is found not 3 million but maybe a few thousand here and there. Step 8. Voter ID", ">>{2coolfordigg} : OK then let's have a redo on the election .", ">>{Tenacious_Ceeee} : Voter Fraud allegations is about delegitimizing liberal democracy as the best system of government, instead favouring illiberal democracies like the system in Russia. Trump is doing as instructed by his Russian overseers to completely destroy the international system as we've come to know it. America looses its moral capacity to promote liberal democratic values abroad when its highest office publicly delegitimizes it as Trump is doing.", '>>{Shr3kk_Wpg} : I think it is because the poor are less likelyto have photo id, and less likely to vote GOP.', '>>{illumination_station} : As an American, I would feel much better knowing that the election was fair. Recounts generally do not try to find fraud and therefore never really look for it. This is a much needed and long overdue investigation.', ">>{echoeco} : we could turn it into a win if we demand the end of Gerrymandering, $$$bought, many different voter id laws, and Super Delegate/Electoral college: all deny an individual their one vote. It's not a Democracy until 1 vote = 1 vote.", ">>{OnStilts} : * Disproportionate effect unequivocally meant to suppress predominantly Democratic voting demographics who are less likely to have the required ID to begin with and more burdened in trying to obtain it (i.e., young, minorities) * Negligible to non-existent scope of voter fraud. Measure does not provide the fix for any material problem and instead creates large scale voter suppression and disenfranchisement problems. * Deliberate unequal distribution of infrastructure to implement voter ID laws as they are. Locations for obtaining voter ID's being limited, closed down, inconveniently located, and vexatiously restrictive and limited opening hours in higher population concentration areas, especially Democratic districts. https://www.aclu.org/other/oppose-voter-id-legislation-fact-sheet http://www.salon.com/2012/07/27/fla_republican_we_suppressed_black_votes/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nEXrAmhD9Y http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/glenn-grothman-joins-other-republicans-in-admitting-voter-id-laws-are-about-suppressing-democratic-voters/ https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/17/us/some-republicans-acknowledge-leveraging-voter-id-laws-for-political-gain.html", '>>{Dildo_Shwaggins100} : eek barba dirkle, someones gonna get laid in college', '>>{OnStilts} : Do you not understand the points I just mentioned, or are you just not equipped with the brains or spine to answer them directly?', ">>{echopeus} : Seeing as more than 80% of the USA have DL's one can almost figure a way to get the other 20% one too why should voter fraud be the reason to put voter ID into effect? Why not do it to you know, do it? You could use ID's as the reason to have less of this other infrastructure no?", '>>{OnStilts} : This is one of those great-on-paper things, but in practice all those partisan powers that be that write and implement the Voter ID Laws deliberately engineer it to have the disproportionate, unequal effect I described above. Everyone would be fine with Voter ID cards simply being distributed gratis to every eligible voter in America but that clearly is not how these plans manifest in reality.', ">>{echopeus} : if in fact we are all equal why would this not be the thing to strive for? In reality this should be done, but its not... As much as I'd like this to stop voter fraud I'd want this measure put in place to know that my Voted was Tallied at the end of the day.", ">>{OnStilts} : So ostensibly wanting free equally and conveniently distributed voter ID (even if we do want to say it's 'just because' rather than a cost that should be demonstrably justified) means we have to capitulate to Republicans' disingenuous exploitation of the issue and can't call out partisan voter id laws that exact unequal burden and suppress voters along brazenly partisan lines?", ">>{echopeus} : free equality, there is no such thing. Also, Mexico and Canada have voter ID laws as does India... They all have much poorer people and India has a much larger population. There is no real reason to not have Voter ID, unless you make this about Party bullshit like what you're bringing to the table.", ">>{OnStilts} : What *I'm* bringing to the table? You just dismiss the identifying of party bullshit as, itself, party bullshit. How convenient and cowardly. Regarding the relative state of voter id requirements in different places, Canada for example *doesn't* in fact have anything close to the suppressive Voter ID laws that the Republicans specifically and other people like you are gunning for and imposing all over the US already. In Canada, voter registration is much more proactive and centralized. Elections Canada provides online voter registration, they will also go door to door and they provide registration confirmation cards to everyone. At the polls voters have a number of options for identifying themselves, only one of which involves any photo ID, and none of them involve some dedicated Voter ID card. You pretended you didn't know what was wrong with the Voter ID laws and then, when you are told, just dismiss all of it out of hand rather than tackling the inconvenient facts, tipping your hand as a wholly partisan proponent.", ">>{echopeus} : whats cowardly is never wanting to do the Right thing especially if its the other side thats doing it - That my friend is cowardly So who says we can't create a voting like canada, why leave that off the table? there are no issues with voter ID, as is proven by Countries North and South of us and all over the world... I don't pretend anything, I think once reality sets in that Voter ID needs to happen logical solutions are everywhere. I've said this in other Posts.", ">>{OnStilts} : Nope. Ignoring the facts of partisan unequal implementation and effect, and ignoring the legal principle of proportionality is still what's cowardly.", '>>{echopeus} : ooh big words that together make little sense, lol... You can believe what you want I guess, but concerning that this isn\'t somehow fixable is by far what is most cowardly... its sticking your fingers in your ears and chanting "la la la la" really loud cowardly... yes I\'m comparing you to a child.', '>>{OnStilts} : Continued denial and projection... still utterly incapable of engaging with the substance. SAD', '>>{echopeus} : so Canada can do it, Mexico can do it, India can do it, Brazil can do it, Germany can do it, Netherlands can do it... fuck Switzerland can do it.. Where exactly is your substance? please explain to me'], [">>{DornHoli0} : I'm thoroughly confused. Federal court says it keeps going, and minutes later State Court says it stops. What exactly is happening?", '>>{JusticeMerickGarland} : It comes down to this. Republicans want to stop the recount at any cost. They are so sure that HRC tried to steal the election and voter fraud was out of control, but they want to stop it. That is the first critical point. The only other thing we need to know (and we probably never will) is what the real count is. But those who are willing to recount would like to get closer to the answer.', ">>{ballb33} : As a Michigander I am totally unsure. They are stopping recounts in precincts where the box counts aren't matching the ballots counts. Some boxes are unsealed and stops a recount too. Lots of issues in Detroit.", ">>{SymbioticPatriotic} : It is a confusing miasma of litigation. Which is why Jill's targeting to raise $9.5 million. All those legal bills.", '>>{s0lstice11} : What are Republicans so afraid about that they want to stop the recount? Serious question, serious answer please.', ">>{TheAmazingAsshole2} : If the recount isn't done before December 13th there's a chance the state's electoral votes wouldn't count. I doubt there'd be as much pushback had the recount been requested a few days after the election instead of at literally the last possible moment.", '>>{tinytankzz} : There is a date to submit it by and they submitted it though right?', '>>{TheAmazingAsshole2} : Yes, they waited til the very last moment to submit it in all three states.', '>>{tinytankzz} : Well before the deadline is before the deadline plain and simple.', ">>{TheAmazingAsshole2} : Well of course, after the deadline means they'd reject the request. You know that isn't the point", ">>{tinytankzz} : I don't actually. What is the point of saying they waited till the last minute? If they did it in time then there is no issue other than the pushback causing the EC votes to not count or the date being set to late. Neither of which can be pinned on those requesting the recount.", ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : You're having the exact same debate I had a little bit ago. Almost word for word. That's funny. I was saying what you are saying, and the person I was talking to was saying what the person you are talking to is saying."], ['>>{Micasan1} : WH analysis of ObamaCare replacement projects bigger coverage gap than CBO: report', ">>{cabose7} : so when they said they don't trust the CBO i don't think anyone realized they meant the CBO was *too optimistic*", '>>{banjist} : So why the fuck is the president twittering on about what a great beautiful plan it is?', '>>{Obtuse_Mongoose} : Its like when drinking so much will make anything seem attractive, Trump in essence consumed the entire alcoholic content of both Ireland and Germany in order to make Republicare seem "beautiful."', ">>{eggsuckingdog} : You don't actually think he read this analysis right?", '>>{Katzeye} : 54 Million uninsured by 2026. Holy fuck. Vote this to the top, folks. Everyone needs to be made aware of this travesty.', '>>{pheonix200} : Oh Boy! This is going to cost a lot of White House staffers their jobs!', '>>{altfactsarepeopletoo} : Only one conclusion to draw from this, Trump threw Ryan under the bus. Bye bye AHCA.', '>>{bunglejerry} : This is the largest coverage gap ever. Period. - Sean Spicer', '>>{FullClockworkOddessy} : No. He just thinks the idea of poor people dying is beautiful.', ">>{Time4Red} : No, he thinks the idea of people complaining about Healthcare is more palatable than people complaining about Russia. He doesn't give a shit about healthcare.", '>>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : *"Virtually impossible to have 14 million people lose coverage. It needs to be at least... three times bigger than this."*', '>>{ruiner8850} : They don\'t want everyone to have healthcare period. Even if magically it could be paid for 100% for free they don\'t want it because they think that it will hurt them. They talk about "rationing" all the time and they don\'t want to have to wait for poor people. These people simply believe that they are better than them and "those people" don\'t deserve to be healthy.', ">>{Geaux} : The President needs to come out and pan the plan, retracting his support. He needs to challenge the Republicans on this, so people think he's actually involved.", ">>{oahut} : How else will Russia cripple the US for 50-100 years? This billionaire tax break called the AHCA will kill more Americans than Vietnam and the two Iraq Wars combined. For 10's of millions of Rubles -- which isn't a lot, Trump will sentence 100's of thousands of Americans to death before single payer will inevitably be enacted. We should build a memorial wall for those who die from the AHCA.", '>>{snugglebutt} : What makes you think he actually read the plan?']]

classify and reply

['>>{71tsiser} : Trump in Palm Beach: Why did Russian pay so much for his mansion?', '>>{Aurify} : Makes sense considering Mexico has repeatedly stated they "will not pay for the fucking wall."', ">>{Gscarveguy} : 'Cuz Trump was seriously in need of money to pay off a loan at Deutshebank...so the Russians laundered the money through the sale so it wouldn't appear to be a direct pay off.", '>>{Searchlights} : i am real amerikans citizen and even i am knowing the currencys exchanges are why so much. Is not problem! And her emails', ">>{malcontented} : American here. I'm not paying for any stupid fucking wall", '>>{crazednutter} : Conspiracy, The Obama Administration Sweeps Email Scandal Under the Rug', ">>{fuckintolerance} : Of course we would pay for it. According to Trump he doesn't feel like waiting for Mexico to pay for it.", '>>{drugorexic} : To hide the money from his wife in his divorce. This house is now being demolished.', '>>{dropkickninja} : he would say he was gunna then just stiff the contractors', '>>{NBC_Created_Trump} : Trump should start a special fund and collect all the money from his supporters, or from proceeds from selling his goofy hat.', '>>{jeffwinger_esq} : Yeah, just like the for-profit company in Kentucky or wherever solicited donations to build the life-sized Noah\'s Ark in the middle of nowhere. "Donations."', '>>{imanimalent} : I suppose that the only good thing that can come out of this "Hillary email(gate)" would be that the future Secretary of State and staff will be less likely to use private email servers and less likely to be responsible for State Department leaks... unless this administration can figure a way to screw that up, as well.', ">>{Not_A_Doctor__} : >In 2008, Dmitry Rybolovlev bought the Palm Beach mansion owned by Trump for $13 million more than the most expensive Palm Beach mansion sale up to that moment. It’s been almost a decade since the sale, but the transaction is newsworthy again as new questions surround contacts between members of Trump’s administration and Russian government officials. >Nonetheless, he went ahead and paid an exceptionally high, $50 million premium to Trump, then a real estate tycoon and reality TV host, for a property he never sought to live in, not even on a part-time basis. There is so much smoke from so many of Trump's dealings.", '>>{jeffwinger_esq} : Oh, awesome. Kentucky taxpayers got to pay for that monstrosity, too. What an honor!', ">>{Donald_J_Putin} : I for one don't think a border wall will be built. Anything above $5B will not pass.", ">>{NBC_Created_Trump} : They dont want healthcare, but they sure want a park for a mythical ark. It gets better - They then send Mitch 'Trutle Fuckface' McConnell, to Washington so he can yank every one elses healthcare. The people of Kentucy and Wisconsin will forever carry the guilt and burden, sin and shame of what they are doing to the rest of the country. Forever hold their peace.", '>>{Nomandate} : Extremely common way to secretly give / launder money.', ">>{Shiba-Shiba} : If she get off with a pass from Obama, the Republicans will Never let up obstructing Government by impeachment proceedings... Hillary's 'High Crimes and Misdemeanours' Abound, and will rebound.", '>>{billslovechild} : Would be happy to. It would literally pay for itself in a year. No more having to pay for unskilled workers and their families special schooling, food, healthcare, incarceration, etc, etc. that is only the ones we keep out. Not including their future offspring. Best investment America ever made by far.', '>>{Hans_Gucci} : It\'s no different than the 3.4 million loan he got from his dad in casino chips, just with real estate. The story goes like this - Trump buys this "mansion" for 41.35 million, can\'t sell it cause it looks like an ugly shit hole. Trump needs cash. And then, out of nowhere, a Russian billionaire hands him $100 million. It\'s not a shady loan or anything because of the real estate transaction.', '>>{crazednutter} : In this government anything is possible :/ Realistically such "sensitive" topics should have never been discussed over email in the first place. paper trails are always the downfall of the "higher up\'s"', ">>{winstonsmith7} : Once Obama can't protect her and she's elected the Reps will have at her and most likely make things stick. That means it's important to take note of who she selects as a VP.", '>>{rcl2} : It seems like they pay more in taxes than they receive: http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2016/oct/02/maria-teresa-kumar/how-much-do-undocumented-immigrants-pay-taxes/ They quote the Heritage Foundation, in-case you wanted some balance.', ">>{HighballJordan} : You already have. Edit- I don't like Trump but statements like this are silly. Have you payed taxes? Have you bought goods? You have probably already helped pay for thousands of causes and things you didn't want to. The wall will be no different if it happens.", ">>{znfinger} : It you watched the state department press statements, you'll have noted that since the Clinton era they've implemented a much more malice/idiot-proof automatic capture of official emails, fortunately.", ">>{stuckinthepow} : What would help is seeing the appraisal. If the appraisal says it's valued at $XMM and it sold for a lot more than the appraisal price, you can easily make a case for money laundering.", '>>{TheDaggestOfNabbits} : I honestly think Trump\'s "Mexico will pay for it" line was to get people talking about whether Mexico would pay for it rather than whether it should be built in the first place.', ">>{Doctor_YOOOU} : I don't know whether Americans will pay for the border wall or not, but we'll be stuck with the maintenance costs...", '>>{crazednutter} : Sad. I thought he was one of the good ones.', ">>{Jews_come_home} : I'm sure they'll continue to obstruct the government the same way they are now, there was never any possibility of constructive collaboration with them. Even the touted crime bill was a giveaway to Republicans, I'd rather her incarcerated than *cooperating* with the GOP frankly.", ">>{Stratospheros} : It's called the art of the deal. /s", ">>{duffmanhb} : Some government organizations here in Germany only use typwiters in their offices. That's how they treat sensitive information in some cases. It's crazy that she was just sending this sort of stuff over the clearnet when we KNOW what the Russians and Chinese are capable of.", ">>{DonutsMcKenzie} : Same reason he doesn't pay his taxes... edit: Plus, when it's the Trump corporation that's building the thing, it would just be crazy for him to pay himself!", '>>{Attorney-at-Birdlaw} : He was a first term senator from **CHICAGO**. How anyone expected anything different blows my mind.', ">>{TahMephs} : Well that's why wikileaks is poised to release them themselves. They won't be able to sweep the shrapnel of that bomb under the rug when everyone and their mom has copies of them", ">>{kbean826} : But instead having to pay unskilled legal Americans twice the wage those poor bastards will do anything for, and now that he's repealing Obamacare, none of them will have insurance, driving up the costs in the E.R., since those jobs will still be shitty and have shitty pay (Though the difference will be made up by charging you and I more for services), those Americans will need to be on food stamps and welfare to make ends meet, and since most SNAP recipients are white people, we should build a fucking wall and get THOSE assholes outta here.", ">>{HighballJordan} : This isn't Westeros. Even that wall isn't gonna work much longer.", ">>{thatssoright} : What appraisal? Mortgage and insurance companies require appraisals so they can make sure the loan and coverage are correct. Cash transactions don't require an appraisal.", ">>{mrason} : you're right but i mean buying a house for 3 times its market price is a pretty big sign something else was going on in that deal that isn't in plain sight.", ">>{MBAMBA0} : I don't know - maybe it was a bribe.", ">>{buddy_burgers} : Guy came out of nowhere and was handed the election in 08. All of my friends were like 'dude, Obama man, like, right?' I was like 'r u fucking kidding me? Who the hell is he? His dad was a CIA agent. Wrong!' But when he got elected everyone was crying happiness. Looks like they (we) got what deserved. It's obvious he's a puppet.", ">>{TheShishkabob} : Buying a house for 3 times it's market price and then never actually living there is an even bigger sign something else is going on.", ">>{TheDon2016} : Lol @ all of these #FakePolls coming out from the sycophantic #FakeNews (CBS News) Their fake electoral polls backfired immensely and now they're doubling down to try and delegitimize Trump's presidency.", '>>{Dinozoar} : If we waste $85 Billion on a useless wall, I will not be surprised.', '>>{tacomanceralpha} : THanks for putting Conspiracy first so i can ignore the rest of it', ">>{AncillaryIssues} : People believe there's actually going to be a wall? Oh, Trumpies. You're so easy to play.", ">>{halfmonty} : “Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't after you.” ― Joseph Heller, Catch-22", ">>{commandantKenny} : Seriously considering not paying taxes should a wall happen. I don't want any part of it.", '>>{MisfortunateFox} : Comrade Americans, this person asks important questions. What about emails?', ">>{Fluidfox} : It's sad that this also means 20% are stupid enough to still believe Mexico will.", ">>{californianion} : I'm guessing Goldman-Sachs. After all, corporations are people, my friend.", ">>{elliotron} : I'm surprised there's 20% of people that think it's a good idea to build a wall and pay for it ourselves.", '>>{billslovechild} : That says nothing about them and the services they receive. 12 billion is nothing. We pay that much for their schooling in Texas alone.', ">>{F1RST_WORLD_PROBLEMS} : How is it worth $95 mil? The construction couldn't have topped 10. Its pretty ugly too.", '>>{mlnjd} : Not even the Russians and Chinese. One person was capable of hacking her server without the money and infrastructure governments have. So no doubt they also got in. Now question is, once they got into her server, did it give them backdoors to other secure govt servers.', '>>{UnpopularMe} : The idea to go out and get your own email server is something only the mind of Hillary can come up with', ">>{fps_Aero} : Everyone should have seen this coming, just another one of his empty promises. Now his racist monument is going to be footed by.. not mexico, not Trump. BUT US, THE FUCKING TAX PAYERS. More than half of America didn't want this fucking wall, and yet it's our money that's going to finance it. Not a dime of Trump's money is going to go to this, because surprise, surprise, HE DOESN'T PAY FUCKING TAXES.", '>>{bitbruja} : Most Americans paying any attention at all suspect she is a criminal. So more evidence is just reeling in the die-hard true believers at this point. Without leadership, it will never happen. People will just continue to distrust govt until we are like the USSR before their collapse. Nobody believed a thing they said.', '>>{ihaveaboehnerr} : And bulldozing it..... and selling the property. Red (USSR) flags everywhere.', ">>{Cayde-187} : Sure, within a certain tolerance. But when you can connect uncommonly generous acts with a sale price that is more than, say, 2 standard deviations higher than comparable property? I'd be hard pressed to find a jury that wouldn't convict. Of course, this ain't a normal court.", ">>{KatanaPig} : To add, it's not just her she will want to protect, but Chelsea Clinton's political future as well.", ">>{Phillipinsocal} : They should not be here in the first place. How do people illegally here pay taxes? Don't you need a social security number to pay taxes? If they're paying taxes, what's stopping them from voting? Here in California, we give federal documents to illegal aliens, how do we know they're not voting in November?", ">>{Gscarveguy} : Well...yeah. Trumps only business since Atlantic City has been money laundering for the Russian Mafia and oligarchs. He certainly doesn't provide this service for nothing, and shady real estate deals are the best way to hide payments he received from the Russians.", ">>{nopus_dei} : There may be a conspiracy, but I wouldn't trust a chemtrails and bigfoot conspiracy blog to tell me about it.", '>>{alvarezg} : There will be a lot of humming and hawing and no wall will be built.', ">>{rk119} : Because he's going to be profiting off this transaction.", ">>{backtorealitywepour} : lol this was the plan all along. Even once no indictment materializes, people will just convince themselves that it's cause the system is rigged... No matter what happens Clinton loses...", '>>{Verick808} : I really assumed it would be nicer looking than that. It would have been better to just buy some land and have your own mansion built. Cheaper too, I imagine.', '>>{PM_ME_ANYTHING_FUN} : Better than a 8 year long never ending religious war', ">>{dominoid73} : Hint: There's not going to be a wall. 85% of our immigration problems have nothing to do with border security.", '>>{adamwho} : All of these people are engaged in money laundering.', ">>{billslovechild} : Sure we'll just take your word for it with all those great sources. Unless you're just saying it's from Jesus.", ">>{MEsniff} : I'm embarrassed that at least 80% of people think there is going to be a wall.", '>>{sleazus_christ} : simplified: mafia tactics. "We will give you this money we need, but now you owe us a favor of our choosing and we will hold this over you whenever we need something"', ">>{MostlyCarbonite} : The wall is a lie. Not the album, that's great. Trump's wall.", ">>{imanimalent} : I would imagine that, with one's own server and IT Professional, keeping emails ready to delete on command would still be quite possible. That, I'm sure, was the primary reason Hillary 'needed' her own personal email server - to keep her 'personal' emails out of scrupulous hands of Law Enforcement and Ethics committees.", '>>{imanimalent} : You have that right, I\'m sure. I fully believe that she has always been the "pants" in the Clinton Family business back as far as Bill\'s time as Arkansas\' AG. I think this is the only reason she married Bill was to insure she had a hand in controlling government, if not in person, then by controlling Bill.', '>>{willywalloo} : The county should have a yearly appraisal letter at least for tax purposes.', '>>{secede_everywhere} : Taking statements like this literally is also pretty silly... Obviously, "we" pay for terrible things - corporate subsidies, war, etc - but we don\'t write the budget, our intelligent Congress does.', ">>{PragProgLibertarian} : There was a senator who got caught in a similar scheme a few years ago (can't remember the name). Basically, the lobbyist bought his house for twice it's worth to get him to vote the way he wanted.", '>>{cd411} : >50 million dollar premium. Let that sink in for a minute.', ">>{Nymaz} : Naw, that just means he's smart ^at ^laundering ^money ^^from ^^the ^^Russians", '>>{PM-ME-YOUR-BITCOINS} : It\'s interesting to hear the perspective of a marxist in the same way it\'s interesting to hear the perspective of a furry, but the reality is you\'re so far outside the mainstream you don\'t understand how disconnected your experience is from how everyone else perceives you. No one has thought of the Soviet Union as having anything to do with the left since the \'70s. Russia, per or post iron curtain, is simply a rival military power. "Soviet" has no meaning outside of USSR. "Comrade" is a just a shibboleth for recognizing villains in \'80s movies. Russia is our enemy regardless of whether they\'re hurting their own people with greed or stupidity.', ">>{cyking} : > pretty big sign something else was going on It's not so long as YOU DON' RUN FOR PRESIDENT and win!", ">>{Longinus} : > 3.4 million loan he got from his dad in casino chips Jesus. I hadn't heard that one. That's just Money-Laundering 101 shit right there.", ">>{ParisGreenGretsch} : Cost effective business practices and money laundering are mutually exclusive concepts. I'd bet dollars to donuts that explains how in God's name you can tank a casino.", ">>{Sir_Francis_Burton} : Want to beef up border security? Fine. It's not one of my top priorities, but I'm not against it. Increase the budget for the border patrol. They're the experts. They know how to get the most bang for the buck. But dictating to them specific measures is micromanaging. I'm guessing they would probably put some of any additional funding into physical barriers, but I'd bet that they'd spend more of that money on other things.", '>>{Holmes02} : ^^^More ^^^Like ^^^Fence', '>>{MEsniff} : When do you think that they will realize that there is never going to be a wall? Trump will go to the 2020 election with "build a wall" "lock her up" "repeal Obamacare" etc and his supporters will buy the hats again.', ">>{HighballJordan} : He sounded pretty literal. Then again we are in the era of what people say doesn't matter.", '>>{volkommm} : ~nuzzles you *glomps on Russian sympathizers* okeez :3 rawr XD', '>>{rcl2} : It seems you don\'t need a SS# to pay taxes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individual_Taxpayer_Identification_Number "The ITIN program was created in 1996 for the purpose of allowing tax return filing by individuals without a social security account number. Receiving an ITIN number does not in itself confer the right to work and receive income in the United States."', ">>{bsthrow} : These dumb fucks are going to build an ark....tell kids that every animal in the world was saved via a similar boat...the kids are going to call bullshit since that's what kids do and it hopefully has the opposite effect of what they're hoping to achieve.", '>>{goofynarwhal} : yep, and most property tax documents are available at the local court house.....hmmmm maybe some more digging can be done?', ">>{quipsquaff} : Don't they take taxes from most of us? We don't all have the luxury of opting out.... If only.", '>>{wait_what_how_do_I} : Da, is of no concern to us Americans. Let us hail glorious leader!', ">>{delcocait} : Let's say Trump was in trouble financially and the Russian's agreed to help him out by taking this property off his hands at above market value...in 2008... Does this mean Trump's entire Obama birther campaign was also part of the Russian misinformation destabilization scheme?", ">>{sharkt0pus} : Didn't Trump go after a fellow candidate for this very thing during the campaign? Obviously not to this scale, but I seem to remember a video of him explaining how a fellow candidate had sold his home for far above market value.", '>>{Freckled_daywalker} : I have to believe it would be cheaper to go after the 40% of illegal immigration that comes from visa overstays and go after large companies that employ undocumented workers than to build and maintain a 2k mile long wall.', '>>{secede_everywhere} : I would be very impressed if he meant it.', '>>{commandantKenny} : They take payroll taxes...but if trump can opt out why not me?', '>>{WarthogOsl} : Sounds similar to Randy Cunnigham. He was a congressman from California who sold a house to a defense contractor for $700,000 over market price. He was later thrown in jail for that and other things.', '>>{Scrimshawmud} : The art of the money laundering treason perjury jubilee.', ">>{Biggusdickus73} : Donnie's doing a fine job of that himself. Only an idiot thinks CBS is fake news.", ">>{Scrimshawmud} : Anything he's accused others of doing seems to be something he himself did.", ">>{Freckled_daywalker} : What fake polls? The polls said Clinton was up by 3 pts and I think she won the popular vote by like 2.5? The results were well within the margin of error. Clinton's win was statistically more likely, but not by much and statistically improbable things happen all the time. All that aside, opinion polls are more reliable than prospective voter polls because there are significantly fewer variables (you don't have to tease out whether the respondent is a likely voter). I know that math and science and facts are hard but your attempt to delegitimize opinions you disagree with is weak. Winning the election is the easy part, but Trump (and his followers) are now playing on a whole new field and you all need to step up your game.", ">>{amishengineer} : Is it possible the Russia just threw money at the property so it couldn't be given to his wife in divorce?", ">>{ThatFeministGirl} : You must have some deductions you can take, don't you?", '>>{Biggusdickus73} : They pay more than Donnie but so does just about anyone.', ">>{TheDon2016} : You're referencing national polls. However the state polls were tied into the electoral map and that's why they kept saying Hillary had a 98% chance to win. Now go on touting how intelligent you are like a typical smug leftist. In my experience, those who have to tout their intelligence are, in fact, lacking severely in that department.", ">>{Freckled_daywalker} : In addition to using ITNs, they use the SSNs of citizens to pass work verifications and therefore have wages withheld as prospective tax payments. Since they can't risk actually filing returns using that number, any refunds they'd be due if they actually did file just remain in the Treasury. As to California, their ID's are marked as non-citizens and when people go to register to vote their ID info is checked against a statewide database. If you're flagged as a non citizen, you can't register.", '>>{kinith} : Who else would? That\'s like saying "I\'m gonna get a new fence for my yard, but I\'m going to make my neighbor pay for it." What sense does this make? Who believes this shit? Bottom line, there probably won\'t be a wall.', ">>{commandantKenny} : I just don't make that much. Nothing like 40 hour weeks and still making poverty and trying to pay off student loans and raise a kid....", '>>{TheDon2016} : The sycophantic press is in the DNC\'s pockets as correspondence from the leaked Podesta e-mails revealed. This is quite obvious at how the mainstream press adulated and adored Obama. Did you watch the presser today? Lots of "thank you Mr. President" and "call me" and soft ball questions swooning about how much he advanced LGBT rights and setup "questions" for him to attack Trump. The coverage between Republicans and Democrats from the mainstream press is blatantly obvious to anyone living in reality. It\'s laugable that today they announced they are going to get "tough and fearless" in their coverage of the President. Where was that attitude for the past 8 years? Trust in the MSM is at an all time low. That\'s why Trump won. Of course I don\'t expect many in /r/politics to admit this as the MSM is helping to drive their narrative. It\'s a tool for them.', ">>{ThatFeministGirl} : Well under Trump, your tax rate will be zero so you won't have to pay any!", '>>{Capop} : Ugh! Building a wall is cute and will give TRUMP construction and the Chinese steel producers 8 years of tax payer blank checks. However, If you want a true barrier, you\'ll need to build what East/West Germany had and what North/South Korea currently has. Beyond building that you are wasting time and a shit ton of money. Oh, and building something like this is an even larger waste of time and money and truly shows the world just how deeply fascist the U.S. has slipped into. -------------------------- *"And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves, And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves."*', ">>{billslovechild} : Well I'd like to actually see what you are basing this off.", '>>{TriscuitCracker} : I feel like "We\'re going to build a wall." is Trump\'s version of Obama saying he\'ll close Guantanamo Bay. To be sure, there are legit reasons why Guantanamo didn\'t close, but with the wall, it\'s just a stupid thing to do and promise.', ">>{drdissonance} : They're paying property tax through rent, they aren't homeless. Besides education, the only benefits they are receiving are police and fire which exist already and would do their jobs whether or not they are in the country or not. Also, they pay sales tax in Texas which is higher than much of the country and do not receive food stamps, Medicaid, or any other social support benefits.", '>>{j0e_the_an0n} : Word is Elon Musk is going to build a hyperloop train from the gulf coast to LA. Going to be a lot of de-regulation to set up the Elon Musk solar panels to power and electrify the whole thing. Will be Brownsville Texans all over LA for the afternoon. Casinos and hotels as far as the eye can see. Lotsa hooas. Will transport illegals from Cali to Brownsville to be barged across the gulf to deep south Mexico. The equivalent of a modern day intercontinental railroad. As a gesture of goodwill, the project is handed to Mexico for their returning workers.', '>>{KamalaKHAAAAAAAAAN} : Let\'s add the other reality: We tried this, and it\'s logistically unworkable. There are about 700 miles of fence on the border already, doing basically fuckall. Any "wall" we see is going to be targeted fencing like it was before because borders generally *aren\'t* clean lines for very long stretches. And nothing about it will keep people from overstaying tourist Visas, or tunneling, or coming in via vehicle, or going over the fence, or using the Gulf Coast beaches themselves. It\'s a stupid idea.', ">>{toofine} : This guy lost the vote by 3 million people, this was when almost everyone assumed the wall was a fiction spewed by a soon to be loser. The idea is so braindead it'd probably bring about the biggest protests in our nation's history.", ">>{edbro333} : If a wall gets built I can't wait to demolish it", '>>{anonybliss} : Trump will never run for President! Trump will never be the Republican nominee! Trump will never become president!', ">>{HeathcliffHeathcliff} : Can't build a wall with votes and headlines. Mortar doesn't stick to them very well.", '>>{spacehogg} : >I get it. Up is down so... Trump will never disclose his tax returns! Trump will never be poor! Trump will never be assassinated!', ">>{Outlulz} : Unfortunately it's much harder to get a wall built than just voting for. The bureaucracy, environmental lawsuits, and lawsuits from people whose private property the wall will cut through is going to prevent it from being built. And our tax dollars (not Mexico's) are going to be wasted on the feds fighting for a boondoggle. Even if Trump lasts all 8 years I don't see how a wall thousands of miles long is going to be built.", ">>{Outlulz} : Won't happen. The President-elect employs illegal aliens at his properties and there are many corporate donors that wouldn't allow Republicans to punish businesses for hiring cheap, exploitable labor.", ">>{Outlulz} : >Here in California, we give federal documents to illegal aliens, how do we know they're not voting in November? How are you not aware that states handle voting and IDs and not the federal government? And a simple Google search would yield that the drivers license illegals get do not allow them to vote. It's not the same kind of ID citizens get.", ">>{Freckled_daywalker} : You're right, but if the goal was actually to reduce illegal immigration, that would be the smart way to do it.", '>>{thedvorakian} : Someone will still get a shit ton if public money to do a shitty job making it bigger.', ">>{anonybliss} : I'd argue its pretty hard to become President of the United States.", ">>{Aggressio} : I think it's pretty clear who is going to pay for it. The interesting part is who is going to get that deal building it.", ">>{CantBeStumped} : Another American here. You don't have a choice.", ">>{Semper_Fi_Do_or_Die} : Don't even bother engaging; it's just a troll.", '>>{TheHappyBirthdayer} : Maybe if the Democrats field a non-repugnant candidate in 2020...', ">>{jlaux} : Risky but I've considered this as well. With enough people, it may make a difference.", ">>{gnovos} : Stop paying taxes. It's the only protest that can possibly matter, and only if everyone joins in.", ">>{CyberHarassmentPanda} : You won't pay for the wall. Your kids, grandkids, and everyone else's kids and grandkids will pay for the wall. Republicans pay for big projects on credit from the future while pretending to be fiscally responsible. Trump is even pretending he can put projects on another country's credit.", ">>{Felinomancy} : Why on earth would anyone think Mexico will want to pay for it? Forget economics, any Mexican President seen to kowtow to America would be impeached - if he hasn't been gunned down by an irate populace first.", ">>{gorgewall} : I'm sure the right and/or Russia will be able to whip up some fresh propaganda just in time for you to believe whoever the Dems nominate is the literal anti-Christ yet again. There is no one the left won't turn on if they're manipulated correctly. I'd love to see a list tracking the progressive heroes posters here want to run in 2020 and see how many of them flip on them for failing to meet one of any number of unrealistic and often conflicting purity standards.", ">>{gorgewall} : Apparently it's as easy as telling bald-faced lies to idiots while your opposition tries to make a tough sell on reality.", ">>{dalgeek} : You'll pay for an attempt at a wall which will do nothing but funnel billions of dollars into the pockets of corrupted politicians. If you thought [The Big Dig](http://www.bigdighighwayrobbery.com/) was bad, you ain't seen nothing yet.", ">>{dalgeek} : I'm not a lawyer or tax advisor, so do this at your own risk. Start your own business, pay yourself and your family as employees. Hell, lease your house to your business for the full cost of the mortgage. Claim enough losses that you don't owe any taxes. Depreciate everything you buy (car, computer, printer, etc.) You can do this for 3 years before the IRS gets suspicious.", ">>{porlob} : Well, except for the ones wondering what happened to the ACA they depended on. Somehow that will be Obama's fault, too.", ">>{porlob} : Just become a billionaire and you won't have to!", ">>{slanaiya} : They picked someone who had a 66% approval rating in 2012. Someone who even a majority of Republicans approved not very long ago and who Democrats overwhelming approved of. She didn't fundamentally change between 2012 and 2016.", '>>{AssCalloway} : The will be a concrete prop named "The Wall". It\'ll be a mile long and real tall and pretty. Trump will pose in front of it and say he did the job.', ">>{_Hopped_} : I might be misunderstanding the situation (not living in America), but isn't the idea that the wall is built and the money comes in over-time from a new trade agreement with Mexico? i.e. America fronts the cash, and gets it back over-time from Mexico.", ">>{WhySoWorried} : There's already a wall along much of the border, his taxes have paid for it, so yeah, he's already paid for a stupid fucking wall.", ">>{vancevon} : The President, or more specifically, the Office of Management and Budget writes the budget. The Congress can change the budget and has to approve it, but they don't write it. They do write appropriations, though.", '>>{yaosio} : No, he said Mexico will pay for it.', '>>{yaosio} : Mexico is not paying for a wall. Trump is exploiting us like all capitalists exploit us.', ">>{j0e_the_an0n} : Not suggesting he would pay for it. I'd expect he would be at least an advisor since he does own part of Solar City. A more probable scenario is either the US or Mexico enacts a new type of public works project. Would be a good idea for Mexico if things really do move forward and illegals deported. FDR created such a thing by executive order as part of his new deal program. Ended up four terms: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Works_Progress_Administration", ">>{quipsquaff} : Yeaaah I know well not the intricacies of it but I know that's how shit gets done. With my luck the IRS will be banging on my door the day after I claim all that. Ha. I'm not orange enough to get away with it.", ">>{gorgewall} : >This candidate is actually electable / has a chance of getting something done in office! RAAAAAGH, CORPORATE PATSY, LET THE GOP RUN EVERYTHING AGAIN! I'm sure Warren is next. Someone will dig up a vote of hers that they disagree with and then that'll be clear evidence that she's just like all the establishment corporate stooges and we need a *real* progressive hero that'll take the party to the left.", ">>{Biggusdickus73} : Go watch Bush's final press conference and get back to me. The delusion is strong with you.", '>>{truenorth00} : Blame candidates for voter ignorance? So much for personal responsibility.', '>>{TheHappyBirthdayer} : People were tired of choosing between corporatist stooge 1 and 2.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{crazednutter} : Conspiracy, The Obama Administration Sweeps Email Scandal Under the Rug', '>>{imanimalent} : I suppose that the only good thing that can come out of this "Hillary email(gate)" would be that the future Secretary of State and staff will be less likely to use private email servers and less likely to be responsible for State Department leaks... unless this administration can figure a way to screw that up, as well.', ">>{Shiba-Shiba} : If she get off with a pass from Obama, the Republicans will Never let up obstructing Government by impeachment proceedings... Hillary's 'High Crimes and Misdemeanours' Abound, and will rebound.", '>>{crazednutter} : In this government anything is possible :/ Realistically such "sensitive" topics should have never been discussed over email in the first place. paper trails are always the downfall of the "higher up\'s"', ">>{winstonsmith7} : Once Obama can't protect her and she's elected the Reps will have at her and most likely make things stick. That means it's important to take note of who she selects as a VP.", ">>{znfinger} : It you watched the state department press statements, you'll have noted that since the Clinton era they've implemented a much more malice/idiot-proof automatic capture of official emails, fortunately.", '>>{crazednutter} : Sad. I thought he was one of the good ones.', ">>{Jews_come_home} : I'm sure they'll continue to obstruct the government the same way they are now, there was never any possibility of constructive collaboration with them. Even the touted crime bill was a giveaway to Republicans, I'd rather her incarcerated than *cooperating* with the GOP frankly.", ">>{duffmanhb} : Some government organizations here in Germany only use typwiters in their offices. That's how they treat sensitive information in some cases. It's crazy that she was just sending this sort of stuff over the clearnet when we KNOW what the Russians and Chinese are capable of.", '>>{Attorney-at-Birdlaw} : He was a first term senator from **CHICAGO**. How anyone expected anything different blows my mind.', ">>{TahMephs} : Well that's why wikileaks is poised to release them themselves. They won't be able to sweep the shrapnel of that bomb under the rug when everyone and their mom has copies of them", ">>{buddy_burgers} : Guy came out of nowhere and was handed the election in 08. All of my friends were like 'dude, Obama man, like, right?' I was like 'r u fucking kidding me? Who the hell is he? His dad was a CIA agent. Wrong!' But when he got elected everyone was crying happiness. Looks like they (we) got what deserved. It's obvious he's a puppet.", '>>{tacomanceralpha} : THanks for putting Conspiracy first so i can ignore the rest of it', ">>{halfmonty} : “Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't after you.” ― Joseph Heller, Catch-22", ">>{californianion} : I'm guessing Goldman-Sachs. After all, corporations are people, my friend.", '>>{mlnjd} : Not even the Russians and Chinese. One person was capable of hacking her server without the money and infrastructure governments have. So no doubt they also got in. Now question is, once they got into her server, did it give them backdoors to other secure govt servers.', '>>{UnpopularMe} : The idea to go out and get your own email server is something only the mind of Hillary can come up with', '>>{bitbruja} : Most Americans paying any attention at all suspect she is a criminal. So more evidence is just reeling in the die-hard true believers at this point. Without leadership, it will never happen. People will just continue to distrust govt until we are like the USSR before their collapse. Nobody believed a thing they said.', ">>{KatanaPig} : To add, it's not just her she will want to protect, but Chelsea Clinton's political future as well.", ">>{nopus_dei} : There may be a conspiracy, but I wouldn't trust a chemtrails and bigfoot conspiracy blog to tell me about it.", ">>{backtorealitywepour} : lol this was the plan all along. Even once no indictment materializes, people will just convince themselves that it's cause the system is rigged... No matter what happens Clinton loses...", ">>{imanimalent} : I would imagine that, with one's own server and IT Professional, keeping emails ready to delete on command would still be quite possible. That, I'm sure, was the primary reason Hillary 'needed' her own personal email server - to keep her 'personal' emails out of scrupulous hands of Law Enforcement and Ethics committees.", '>>{imanimalent} : You have that right, I\'m sure. I fully believe that she has always been the "pants" in the Clinton Family business back as far as Bill\'s time as Arkansas\' AG. I think this is the only reason she married Bill was to insure she had a hand in controlling government, if not in person, then by controlling Bill.'], ['>>{Aurify} : Makes sense considering Mexico has repeatedly stated they "will not pay for the fucking wall."', ">>{malcontented} : American here. I'm not paying for any stupid fucking wall", ">>{fuckintolerance} : Of course we would pay for it. According to Trump he doesn't feel like waiting for Mexico to pay for it.", '>>{dropkickninja} : he would say he was gunna then just stiff the contractors', '>>{NBC_Created_Trump} : Trump should start a special fund and collect all the money from his supporters, or from proceeds from selling his goofy hat.', '>>{jeffwinger_esq} : Yeah, just like the for-profit company in Kentucky or wherever solicited donations to build the life-sized Noah\'s Ark in the middle of nowhere. "Donations."', '>>{jeffwinger_esq} : Oh, awesome. Kentucky taxpayers got to pay for that monstrosity, too. What an honor!', ">>{Donald_J_Putin} : I for one don't think a border wall will be built. Anything above $5B will not pass.", ">>{NBC_Created_Trump} : They dont want healthcare, but they sure want a park for a mythical ark. It gets better - They then send Mitch 'Trutle Fuckface' McConnell, to Washington so he can yank every one elses healthcare. The people of Kentucy and Wisconsin will forever carry the guilt and burden, sin and shame of what they are doing to the rest of the country. Forever hold their peace.", '>>{billslovechild} : Would be happy to. It would literally pay for itself in a year. No more having to pay for unskilled workers and their families special schooling, food, healthcare, incarceration, etc, etc. that is only the ones we keep out. Not including their future offspring. Best investment America ever made by far.', '>>{rcl2} : It seems like they pay more in taxes than they receive: http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2016/oct/02/maria-teresa-kumar/how-much-do-undocumented-immigrants-pay-taxes/ They quote the Heritage Foundation, in-case you wanted some balance.', ">>{HighballJordan} : You already have. Edit- I don't like Trump but statements like this are silly. Have you payed taxes? Have you bought goods? You have probably already helped pay for thousands of causes and things you didn't want to. The wall will be no different if it happens.", '>>{TheDaggestOfNabbits} : I honestly think Trump\'s "Mexico will pay for it" line was to get people talking about whether Mexico would pay for it rather than whether it should be built in the first place.', ">>{Doctor_YOOOU} : I don't know whether Americans will pay for the border wall or not, but we'll be stuck with the maintenance costs...", ">>{DonutsMcKenzie} : Same reason he doesn't pay his taxes... edit: Plus, when it's the Trump corporation that's building the thing, it would just be crazy for him to pay himself!", ">>{kbean826} : But instead having to pay unskilled legal Americans twice the wage those poor bastards will do anything for, and now that he's repealing Obamacare, none of them will have insurance, driving up the costs in the E.R., since those jobs will still be shitty and have shitty pay (Though the difference will be made up by charging you and I more for services), those Americans will need to be on food stamps and welfare to make ends meet, and since most SNAP recipients are white people, we should build a fucking wall and get THOSE assholes outta here.", ">>{HighballJordan} : This isn't Westeros. Even that wall isn't gonna work much longer.", ">>{TheDon2016} : Lol @ all of these #FakePolls coming out from the sycophantic #FakeNews (CBS News) Their fake electoral polls backfired immensely and now they're doubling down to try and delegitimize Trump's presidency.", '>>{Dinozoar} : If we waste $85 Billion on a useless wall, I will not be surprised.', ">>{AncillaryIssues} : People believe there's actually going to be a wall? Oh, Trumpies. You're so easy to play.", ">>{commandantKenny} : Seriously considering not paying taxes should a wall happen. I don't want any part of it.", ">>{Fluidfox} : It's sad that this also means 20% are stupid enough to still believe Mexico will.", ">>{elliotron} : I'm surprised there's 20% of people that think it's a good idea to build a wall and pay for it ourselves.", '>>{billslovechild} : That says nothing about them and the services they receive. 12 billion is nothing. We pay that much for their schooling in Texas alone.', ">>{fps_Aero} : Everyone should have seen this coming, just another one of his empty promises. Now his racist monument is going to be footed by.. not mexico, not Trump. BUT US, THE FUCKING TAX PAYERS. More than half of America didn't want this fucking wall, and yet it's our money that's going to finance it. Not a dime of Trump's money is going to go to this, because surprise, surprise, HE DOESN'T PAY FUCKING TAXES.", ">>{Phillipinsocal} : They should not be here in the first place. How do people illegally here pay taxes? Don't you need a social security number to pay taxes? If they're paying taxes, what's stopping them from voting? Here in California, we give federal documents to illegal aliens, how do we know they're not voting in November?", '>>{alvarezg} : There will be a lot of humming and hawing and no wall will be built.', ">>{rk119} : Because he's going to be profiting off this transaction.", '>>{PM_ME_ANYTHING_FUN} : Better than a 8 year long never ending religious war', ">>{dominoid73} : Hint: There's not going to be a wall. 85% of our immigration problems have nothing to do with border security.", ">>{billslovechild} : Sure we'll just take your word for it with all those great sources. Unless you're just saying it's from Jesus.", ">>{MEsniff} : I'm embarrassed that at least 80% of people think there is going to be a wall.", ">>{MostlyCarbonite} : The wall is a lie. Not the album, that's great. Trump's wall.", '>>{secede_everywhere} : Taking statements like this literally is also pretty silly... Obviously, "we" pay for terrible things - corporate subsidies, war, etc - but we don\'t write the budget, our intelligent Congress does.', ">>{Sir_Francis_Burton} : Want to beef up border security? Fine. It's not one of my top priorities, but I'm not against it. Increase the budget for the border patrol. They're the experts. They know how to get the most bang for the buck. But dictating to them specific measures is micromanaging. I'm guessing they would probably put some of any additional funding into physical barriers, but I'd bet that they'd spend more of that money on other things.", '>>{Holmes02} : ^^^More ^^^Like ^^^Fence', '>>{MEsniff} : When do you think that they will realize that there is never going to be a wall? Trump will go to the 2020 election with "build a wall" "lock her up" "repeal Obamacare" etc and his supporters will buy the hats again.', ">>{HighballJordan} : He sounded pretty literal. Then again we are in the era of what people say doesn't matter.", '>>{rcl2} : It seems you don\'t need a SS# to pay taxes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individual_Taxpayer_Identification_Number "The ITIN program was created in 1996 for the purpose of allowing tax return filing by individuals without a social security account number. Receiving an ITIN number does not in itself confer the right to work and receive income in the United States."', ">>{bsthrow} : These dumb fucks are going to build an ark....tell kids that every animal in the world was saved via a similar boat...the kids are going to call bullshit since that's what kids do and it hopefully has the opposite effect of what they're hoping to achieve.", ">>{quipsquaff} : Don't they take taxes from most of us? We don't all have the luxury of opting out.... If only.", '>>{Freckled_daywalker} : I have to believe it would be cheaper to go after the 40% of illegal immigration that comes from visa overstays and go after large companies that employ undocumented workers than to build and maintain a 2k mile long wall.', '>>{secede_everywhere} : I would be very impressed if he meant it.', '>>{commandantKenny} : They take payroll taxes...but if trump can opt out why not me?', ">>{Biggusdickus73} : Donnie's doing a fine job of that himself. Only an idiot thinks CBS is fake news.", ">>{Freckled_daywalker} : What fake polls? The polls said Clinton was up by 3 pts and I think she won the popular vote by like 2.5? The results were well within the margin of error. Clinton's win was statistically more likely, but not by much and statistically improbable things happen all the time. All that aside, opinion polls are more reliable than prospective voter polls because there are significantly fewer variables (you don't have to tease out whether the respondent is a likely voter). I know that math and science and facts are hard but your attempt to delegitimize opinions you disagree with is weak. Winning the election is the easy part, but Trump (and his followers) are now playing on a whole new field and you all need to step up your game.", ">>{ThatFeministGirl} : You must have some deductions you can take, don't you?", '>>{Biggusdickus73} : They pay more than Donnie but so does just about anyone.', ">>{TheDon2016} : You're referencing national polls. However the state polls were tied into the electoral map and that's why they kept saying Hillary had a 98% chance to win. Now go on touting how intelligent you are like a typical smug leftist. In my experience, those who have to tout their intelligence are, in fact, lacking severely in that department.", ">>{Freckled_daywalker} : In addition to using ITNs, they use the SSNs of citizens to pass work verifications and therefore have wages withheld as prospective tax payments. Since they can't risk actually filing returns using that number, any refunds they'd be due if they actually did file just remain in the Treasury. As to California, their ID's are marked as non-citizens and when people go to register to vote their ID info is checked against a statewide database. If you're flagged as a non citizen, you can't register.", '>>{kinith} : Who else would? That\'s like saying "I\'m gonna get a new fence for my yard, but I\'m going to make my neighbor pay for it." What sense does this make? Who believes this shit? Bottom line, there probably won\'t be a wall.', ">>{commandantKenny} : I just don't make that much. Nothing like 40 hour weeks and still making poverty and trying to pay off student loans and raise a kid....", '>>{TheDon2016} : The sycophantic press is in the DNC\'s pockets as correspondence from the leaked Podesta e-mails revealed. This is quite obvious at how the mainstream press adulated and adored Obama. Did you watch the presser today? Lots of "thank you Mr. President" and "call me" and soft ball questions swooning about how much he advanced LGBT rights and setup "questions" for him to attack Trump. The coverage between Republicans and Democrats from the mainstream press is blatantly obvious to anyone living in reality. It\'s laugable that today they announced they are going to get "tough and fearless" in their coverage of the President. Where was that attitude for the past 8 years? Trust in the MSM is at an all time low. That\'s why Trump won. Of course I don\'t expect many in /r/politics to admit this as the MSM is helping to drive their narrative. It\'s a tool for them.', ">>{ThatFeministGirl} : Well under Trump, your tax rate will be zero so you won't have to pay any!", '>>{Capop} : Ugh! Building a wall is cute and will give TRUMP construction and the Chinese steel producers 8 years of tax payer blank checks. However, If you want a true barrier, you\'ll need to build what East/West Germany had and what North/South Korea currently has. Beyond building that you are wasting time and a shit ton of money. Oh, and building something like this is an even larger waste of time and money and truly shows the world just how deeply fascist the U.S. has slipped into. -------------------------- *"And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves, And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves."*', ">>{billslovechild} : Well I'd like to actually see what you are basing this off.", '>>{TriscuitCracker} : I feel like "We\'re going to build a wall." is Trump\'s version of Obama saying he\'ll close Guantanamo Bay. To be sure, there are legit reasons why Guantanamo didn\'t close, but with the wall, it\'s just a stupid thing to do and promise.', ">>{drdissonance} : They're paying property tax through rent, they aren't homeless. Besides education, the only benefits they are receiving are police and fire which exist already and would do their jobs whether or not they are in the country or not. Also, they pay sales tax in Texas which is higher than much of the country and do not receive food stamps, Medicaid, or any other social support benefits.", '>>{j0e_the_an0n} : Word is Elon Musk is going to build a hyperloop train from the gulf coast to LA. Going to be a lot of de-regulation to set up the Elon Musk solar panels to power and electrify the whole thing. Will be Brownsville Texans all over LA for the afternoon. Casinos and hotels as far as the eye can see. Lotsa hooas. Will transport illegals from Cali to Brownsville to be barged across the gulf to deep south Mexico. The equivalent of a modern day intercontinental railroad. As a gesture of goodwill, the project is handed to Mexico for their returning workers.', '>>{KamalaKHAAAAAAAAAN} : Let\'s add the other reality: We tried this, and it\'s logistically unworkable. There are about 700 miles of fence on the border already, doing basically fuckall. Any "wall" we see is going to be targeted fencing like it was before because borders generally *aren\'t* clean lines for very long stretches. And nothing about it will keep people from overstaying tourist Visas, or tunneling, or coming in via vehicle, or going over the fence, or using the Gulf Coast beaches themselves. It\'s a stupid idea.', ">>{toofine} : This guy lost the vote by 3 million people, this was when almost everyone assumed the wall was a fiction spewed by a soon to be loser. The idea is so braindead it'd probably bring about the biggest protests in our nation's history.", ">>{edbro333} : If a wall gets built I can't wait to demolish it", '>>{anonybliss} : Trump will never run for President! Trump will never be the Republican nominee! Trump will never become president!', ">>{HeathcliffHeathcliff} : Can't build a wall with votes and headlines. Mortar doesn't stick to them very well.", '>>{spacehogg} : >I get it. Up is down so... Trump will never disclose his tax returns! Trump will never be poor! Trump will never be assassinated!', ">>{Outlulz} : Unfortunately it's much harder to get a wall built than just voting for. The bureaucracy, environmental lawsuits, and lawsuits from people whose private property the wall will cut through is going to prevent it from being built. And our tax dollars (not Mexico's) are going to be wasted on the feds fighting for a boondoggle. Even if Trump lasts all 8 years I don't see how a wall thousands of miles long is going to be built.", ">>{Outlulz} : Won't happen. The President-elect employs illegal aliens at his properties and there are many corporate donors that wouldn't allow Republicans to punish businesses for hiring cheap, exploitable labor.", ">>{Outlulz} : >Here in California, we give federal documents to illegal aliens, how do we know they're not voting in November? How are you not aware that states handle voting and IDs and not the federal government? And a simple Google search would yield that the drivers license illegals get do not allow them to vote. It's not the same kind of ID citizens get.", ">>{Freckled_daywalker} : You're right, but if the goal was actually to reduce illegal immigration, that would be the smart way to do it.", '>>{thedvorakian} : Someone will still get a shit ton if public money to do a shitty job making it bigger.', ">>{anonybliss} : I'd argue its pretty hard to become President of the United States.", ">>{Aggressio} : I think it's pretty clear who is going to pay for it. The interesting part is who is going to get that deal building it.", ">>{CantBeStumped} : Another American here. You don't have a choice.", ">>{Semper_Fi_Do_or_Die} : Don't even bother engaging; it's just a troll.", '>>{TheHappyBirthdayer} : Maybe if the Democrats field a non-repugnant candidate in 2020...', ">>{jlaux} : Risky but I've considered this as well. With enough people, it may make a difference.", ">>{gnovos} : Stop paying taxes. It's the only protest that can possibly matter, and only if everyone joins in.", ">>{CyberHarassmentPanda} : You won't pay for the wall. Your kids, grandkids, and everyone else's kids and grandkids will pay for the wall. Republicans pay for big projects on credit from the future while pretending to be fiscally responsible. Trump is even pretending he can put projects on another country's credit.", ">>{Felinomancy} : Why on earth would anyone think Mexico will want to pay for it? Forget economics, any Mexican President seen to kowtow to America would be impeached - if he hasn't been gunned down by an irate populace first.", ">>{gorgewall} : I'm sure the right and/or Russia will be able to whip up some fresh propaganda just in time for you to believe whoever the Dems nominate is the literal anti-Christ yet again. There is no one the left won't turn on if they're manipulated correctly. I'd love to see a list tracking the progressive heroes posters here want to run in 2020 and see how many of them flip on them for failing to meet one of any number of unrealistic and often conflicting purity standards.", ">>{gorgewall} : Apparently it's as easy as telling bald-faced lies to idiots while your opposition tries to make a tough sell on reality.", ">>{dalgeek} : You'll pay for an attempt at a wall which will do nothing but funnel billions of dollars into the pockets of corrupted politicians. If you thought [The Big Dig](http://www.bigdighighwayrobbery.com/) was bad, you ain't seen nothing yet.", ">>{dalgeek} : I'm not a lawyer or tax advisor, so do this at your own risk. Start your own business, pay yourself and your family as employees. Hell, lease your house to your business for the full cost of the mortgage. Claim enough losses that you don't owe any taxes. Depreciate everything you buy (car, computer, printer, etc.) You can do this for 3 years before the IRS gets suspicious.", ">>{porlob} : Well, except for the ones wondering what happened to the ACA they depended on. Somehow that will be Obama's fault, too.", ">>{porlob} : Just become a billionaire and you won't have to!", ">>{slanaiya} : They picked someone who had a 66% approval rating in 2012. Someone who even a majority of Republicans approved not very long ago and who Democrats overwhelming approved of. She didn't fundamentally change between 2012 and 2016.", '>>{AssCalloway} : The will be a concrete prop named "The Wall". It\'ll be a mile long and real tall and pretty. Trump will pose in front of it and say he did the job.', ">>{_Hopped_} : I might be misunderstanding the situation (not living in America), but isn't the idea that the wall is built and the money comes in over-time from a new trade agreement with Mexico? i.e. America fronts the cash, and gets it back over-time from Mexico.", ">>{WhySoWorried} : There's already a wall along much of the border, his taxes have paid for it, so yeah, he's already paid for a stupid fucking wall.", ">>{vancevon} : The President, or more specifically, the Office of Management and Budget writes the budget. The Congress can change the budget and has to approve it, but they don't write it. They do write appropriations, though.", '>>{yaosio} : No, he said Mexico will pay for it.', '>>{yaosio} : Mexico is not paying for a wall. Trump is exploiting us like all capitalists exploit us.', ">>{j0e_the_an0n} : Not suggesting he would pay for it. I'd expect he would be at least an advisor since he does own part of Solar City. A more probable scenario is either the US or Mexico enacts a new type of public works project. Would be a good idea for Mexico if things really do move forward and illegals deported. FDR created such a thing by executive order as part of his new deal program. Ended up four terms: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Works_Progress_Administration", ">>{quipsquaff} : Yeaaah I know well not the intricacies of it but I know that's how shit gets done. With my luck the IRS will be banging on my door the day after I claim all that. Ha. I'm not orange enough to get away with it.", ">>{gorgewall} : >This candidate is actually electable / has a chance of getting something done in office! RAAAAAGH, CORPORATE PATSY, LET THE GOP RUN EVERYTHING AGAIN! I'm sure Warren is next. Someone will dig up a vote of hers that they disagree with and then that'll be clear evidence that she's just like all the establishment corporate stooges and we need a *real* progressive hero that'll take the party to the left.", ">>{Biggusdickus73} : Go watch Bush's final press conference and get back to me. The delusion is strong with you.", '>>{truenorth00} : Blame candidates for voter ignorance? So much for personal responsibility.', '>>{TheHappyBirthdayer} : People were tired of choosing between corporatist stooge 1 and 2.'], ['>>{71tsiser} : Trump in Palm Beach: Why did Russian pay so much for his mansion?', ">>{Gscarveguy} : 'Cuz Trump was seriously in need of money to pay off a loan at Deutshebank...so the Russians laundered the money through the sale so it wouldn't appear to be a direct pay off.", '>>{Searchlights} : i am real amerikans citizen and even i am knowing the currencys exchanges are why so much. Is not problem! And her emails', '>>{drugorexic} : To hide the money from his wife in his divorce. This house is now being demolished.', ">>{Not_A_Doctor__} : >In 2008, Dmitry Rybolovlev bought the Palm Beach mansion owned by Trump for $13 million more than the most expensive Palm Beach mansion sale up to that moment. It’s been almost a decade since the sale, but the transaction is newsworthy again as new questions surround contacts between members of Trump’s administration and Russian government officials. >Nonetheless, he went ahead and paid an exceptionally high, $50 million premium to Trump, then a real estate tycoon and reality TV host, for a property he never sought to live in, not even on a part-time basis. There is so much smoke from so many of Trump's dealings.", '>>{Nomandate} : Extremely common way to secretly give / launder money.', '>>{Hans_Gucci} : It\'s no different than the 3.4 million loan he got from his dad in casino chips, just with real estate. The story goes like this - Trump buys this "mansion" for 41.35 million, can\'t sell it cause it looks like an ugly shit hole. Trump needs cash. And then, out of nowhere, a Russian billionaire hands him $100 million. It\'s not a shady loan or anything because of the real estate transaction.', ">>{stuckinthepow} : What would help is seeing the appraisal. If the appraisal says it's valued at $XMM and it sold for a lot more than the appraisal price, you can easily make a case for money laundering.", ">>{Stratospheros} : It's called the art of the deal. /s", ">>{thatssoright} : What appraisal? Mortgage and insurance companies require appraisals so they can make sure the loan and coverage are correct. Cash transactions don't require an appraisal.", ">>{mrason} : you're right but i mean buying a house for 3 times its market price is a pretty big sign something else was going on in that deal that isn't in plain sight.", ">>{MBAMBA0} : I don't know - maybe it was a bribe.", ">>{TheShishkabob} : Buying a house for 3 times it's market price and then never actually living there is an even bigger sign something else is going on.", '>>{MisfortunateFox} : Comrade Americans, this person asks important questions. What about emails?', ">>{F1RST_WORLD_PROBLEMS} : How is it worth $95 mil? The construction couldn't have topped 10. Its pretty ugly too.", '>>{ihaveaboehnerr} : And bulldozing it..... and selling the property. Red (USSR) flags everywhere.', ">>{Cayde-187} : Sure, within a certain tolerance. But when you can connect uncommonly generous acts with a sale price that is more than, say, 2 standard deviations higher than comparable property? I'd be hard pressed to find a jury that wouldn't convict. Of course, this ain't a normal court.", ">>{Gscarveguy} : Well...yeah. Trumps only business since Atlantic City has been money laundering for the Russian Mafia and oligarchs. He certainly doesn't provide this service for nothing, and shady real estate deals are the best way to hide payments he received from the Russians.", '>>{Verick808} : I really assumed it would be nicer looking than that. It would have been better to just buy some land and have your own mansion built. Cheaper too, I imagine.', '>>{adamwho} : All of these people are engaged in money laundering.', '>>{sleazus_christ} : simplified: mafia tactics. "We will give you this money we need, but now you owe us a favor of our choosing and we will hold this over you whenever we need something"', '>>{willywalloo} : The county should have a yearly appraisal letter at least for tax purposes.', ">>{PragProgLibertarian} : There was a senator who got caught in a similar scheme a few years ago (can't remember the name). Basically, the lobbyist bought his house for twice it's worth to get him to vote the way he wanted.", '>>{cd411} : >50 million dollar premium. Let that sink in for a minute.', ">>{Nymaz} : Naw, that just means he's smart ^at ^laundering ^money ^^from ^^the ^^Russians", '>>{PM-ME-YOUR-BITCOINS} : It\'s interesting to hear the perspective of a marxist in the same way it\'s interesting to hear the perspective of a furry, but the reality is you\'re so far outside the mainstream you don\'t understand how disconnected your experience is from how everyone else perceives you. No one has thought of the Soviet Union as having anything to do with the left since the \'70s. Russia, per or post iron curtain, is simply a rival military power. "Soviet" has no meaning outside of USSR. "Comrade" is a just a shibboleth for recognizing villains in \'80s movies. Russia is our enemy regardless of whether they\'re hurting their own people with greed or stupidity.', ">>{cyking} : > pretty big sign something else was going on It's not so long as YOU DON' RUN FOR PRESIDENT and win!", ">>{Longinus} : > 3.4 million loan he got from his dad in casino chips Jesus. I hadn't heard that one. That's just Money-Laundering 101 shit right there.", ">>{ParisGreenGretsch} : Cost effective business practices and money laundering are mutually exclusive concepts. I'd bet dollars to donuts that explains how in God's name you can tank a casino.", '>>{volkommm} : ~nuzzles you *glomps on Russian sympathizers* okeez :3 rawr XD', '>>{goofynarwhal} : yep, and most property tax documents are available at the local court house.....hmmmm maybe some more digging can be done?', '>>{wait_what_how_do_I} : Da, is of no concern to us Americans. Let us hail glorious leader!', ">>{delcocait} : Let's say Trump was in trouble financially and the Russian's agreed to help him out by taking this property off his hands at above market value...in 2008... Does this mean Trump's entire Obama birther campaign was also part of the Russian misinformation destabilization scheme?", ">>{sharkt0pus} : Didn't Trump go after a fellow candidate for this very thing during the campaign? Obviously not to this scale, but I seem to remember a video of him explaining how a fellow candidate had sold his home for far above market value.", '>>{WarthogOsl} : Sounds similar to Randy Cunnigham. He was a congressman from California who sold a house to a defense contractor for $700,000 over market price. He was later thrown in jail for that and other things.', '>>{Scrimshawmud} : The art of the money laundering treason perjury jubilee.', ">>{Scrimshawmud} : Anything he's accused others of doing seems to be something he himself did.", ">>{amishengineer} : Is it possible the Russia just threw money at the property so it couldn't be given to his wife in divorce?"]]

classify and reply

['>>{dinvgamma} : The polls are not broken. Say it again. The polls are not broken.', ">>{outbackqueen} : Top BBC foreign correspondent says CIA sources indicated existence of another tape 'of a sexual nature'", ">>{gamechanger55} : why is this surprising news to people when it's pretty obvious that dumpster don has sexually assaulted people", ">>{speaktodragons} : Ex-ICE Agent: I 'Routinely' Arrested Illegal Immigrants with Voter Registrations", ">>{dinvgamma} : Written by political scientist Charles Franklin. Full disclosure: he's a former colleague of mine. (He and his wife make dope brisket.)", '>>{dolphins3} : I mean, we have him on tape bragging about literally assaulting women, so yeah.', '>>{premodernism} : Holy shit Charles Franklin is poll geek royalty from back before HuffPo ruined Pollster. You used to be able to go there and get heavy scientific and mathematical insight into how polls worked and what happened when they failed. The brisket thing just makes me love him more.', ">>{loki8481} : outside of Michigan, the polls have seemed pretty normal this year. the major problems have been pundits like Nate Silver, when he dons his pundit hats, ignoring them just because they don't fit some historical narrative.", ">>{meowwschwitz} : Anyone care to copy/paste for those of us who can't get beyond the pay wall?", ">>{Bardamuze} : If you have to use a indoctrination technique (repeating something so it becomes internalized) to convince people the polls ain't broken, something definitely is broken.", '>>{tau-lepton} : >We also discussed the private security company document, which was widely circulated in recent months among the media, members of Congress and Congressional staff even *before the IC became aware of it.* Just think about that sentence for a second.', '>>{Bhantl01} : All the more reason to do a nation-wide election audit!', ">>{dinvgamma} : I generally don't have a problem if I just use private browsing. And the biggest impact of the article is in the figures, which aren't amenable to copy-paste... but I hope someone is able to upload screenshots to imgur for you", ">>{pissbum-emeritus} : >Ex-ICE Agent: I Routinely Tell Bald-Faced Lies in Exchange for 'Consulting Fees'", '>>{outbackqueen} : True, I can very well imagine him to be a total pervert.', '>>{Zannyth} : So many allegations all election season with literally 0 evidence backing them up. His supporters are all just munching on popcorn watching the media burn itself up. E: *munches popcorn*', '>>{erotic_majesty} : *** extremely yakov smirnoff voice *** In Soviet Russia, pussy grab you', '>>{SaltHash} : GOP/Fox TV wants their viewers to question everything and everybody except their unsubstantiated claims.', '>>{jampekka} : This seems a bit bizarre way of studying if "polls are not broken". Sure, the polls quite reliably compare to the average of polls, but the real question of interest is of course, whether the average is close to the result. In statistics it\'s quite a basic thing that it doesn\'t matter if a measurement is reliable, if it\'s not valid. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Validity_(statistics)', ">>{pktron} : The first wave of comments here, while the post is still New, gives some insight into the paranoid delusions that have flooded /r/politics over the last few months. Everything is broken! The election is stolen! Primary polls aren't that good for a bunch of reasons, but it isn't because they are fundamentally broken or biased.", '>>{pabange} : Good point. I call for a full and immediate recount of Fla. 😁', '>>{DexySP} : Are there any good polling sites, or even aggregator. The only one I can think of is 538 which honestly from seeing it before and now, looks as if they have stopped with science (more or less).. and rather focused on opinion also /u/dinvgamma do you happen to have the brisket recipe at any chance?', ">>{premodernism} : I don't know that it's Silver's pundit hat causing him trouble, he is trying to model instead of aggregate. There's a lot of theory suggesting that the bias introduced by modeling outweighs any benefit it brings in poll-over-poll accuracy. [Read Sam Wang as a starter](http://election.princeton.edu/2012/11/04/comparisons-among-aggregators-and-modelers/), he's good on this sort of thing.", '>>{LanceBelcher} : TBH I was surprised at how tame the alleged dirt was. I really expected there to be a video of him having sex with / murdering a child and not necessarily in that order. I guess the year is still young.', '>>{AmazingAnytime} : The media will never burn itself up. They will still be the loudest voices and they will still get a lot of people to believe them.', '>>{OJSamson} : But donald will never out anything near halfway as good as trapped in the closet.', ">>{CollumMcJingleballs} : [BBC will soon join the ranks of Donald Trump's AXIS OF FAKE NEWS](https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/819393877174087682)", ">>{speaktodragons} : Name one what? I asked a question, what's the problem?", ">>{pktron} : Which of their primary models do you think they've been opinion pieces on?", '>>{premodernism} : Princeton Election Consortium at http://election.princeton.edu/ Pollster still aggregates fairly well, but all of the good commentary and teaching that they used to do disappeared and is sorely missed.', '>>{DexySP} : well technically its not wrong, information takes a while to spread sometimes. But it still shouldnt in reality account for such heavy weighting', '>>{MarbhDamhsa} : Well, there was Michigan. The night of the election, he indicated that Bernie could beat the polling based on nothing but a gut feeling.', ">>{marshmcdan} : >There is no evidence that the variation in residuals has changed substantially since 2000. The variation tends to decrease closer to elections but the overall spread of the residuals has been relatively consistent across the five elections, including 2016 so far. He goes on to say how mathematically consistent polls have been since then. Isn't that just confirming that they started to really fix the polls after the bush/gore 2000 debacle? I'm not saying it's every poll/voting booth, not everyone everywhere, but politics is death by a thousand cuts. What a great alibi to have it be so consistent", ">>{beermile} : I'm not saying it's surprising, but for most people it's uncommon to have sexual encounters captured with video evidence against the will of the participants. Certainly neither of mine were.", ">>{dinvgamma} : Sorry, no recipe! He just hosted a reading group one week. As for which sites: I'm not sure, but I'll say this. I, and all of my quant poli sci colleagues, default to 538. For us, it's still the best by a mile. I've also been seeing good predictions from benchmarkpolitics, but frankly I think their methodology is pretty opaque. In the academic community, not being explicit with your model, data, and estimator is cause for concern.", '>>{zan5ki} : Are the polls broken? A steady stream of articles over the past nine months has examined the challenges of the polling industry, pointing to highly visible failures, the rise of cell phones and the decline of response rates. And indeed, in Michigan and Indiana the polls were wrong for the Democratic primary, although not for the Republican primary. These articles raise some good points. Reporting does tend to seize on the most surprising poll which is, in fact, more likely an outlier than harbinger of a dramatic new trend. And there are technical and economic issues affecting the polling industry that are cause for serious concern. Yet for all the claims of broken polls, little direct evidence has been provided. Yes, response rates are down but has accuracy suffered as a result? Yes, polls differ from one another, but are “wild fluctuations” more common? I’ve examined all the presidential general election polling since 2000 — which is 2,056 polls in all. These data tell a very different story, however. The polls aren’t “broken” after all. The graph below plots the Democratic candidate’s share minus the Republican candidate’s share. Each gray point is a poll. The blue line is a trend — estimates via what is called “local regression”— that tracks the polling average over the election. [Graph](http://i.imgur.com/zmJn52b.jpg) The most important point is that the gray dots, the individual polls, are scattered around the trend line. This scatter is the measure of how much variation we get from the polls beyond what is due to the changes in trend over time. On any given day, some polls are above the trend and some below. This means one can always find “disagreement” among the polls. And when the trend is close to zero — that is, close to a tied race — then we find some polls with one party ahead and some with the other ahead. But how variable are the polls around the trend, and has this variation become larger, as the claim that polling is broken or wildly variable would suggest? To answer that question, subtract the trend estimate on the day the poll was completed from the poll result. This is called the “residual” and is a measure of the deviation of each poll from the trend. If polls have become increasingly unreliable over the past 16 years, we should see more variation around the trend, and the residuals should become more spread out in recent elections compared to earlier ones. If 2016 is especially bad for polls, this year should be clearly more variable. The next graph plots the residuals against time for each election. [Graph](http://imgur.com/SuWeC6c.jpg) There is no evidence that the variation in residuals has changed substantially since 2000. The variation tends to decrease closer to elections but the overall spread of the residuals has been relatively consistent across the five elections, including 2016 so far. Are current polls producing more outliers — that is, results further from the trend than we would expect due to normal sampling variation? If the residuals were perfectly normally distributed —that is, they precisely followed a “bell curve”— we would expect 5 percent of the polls to be more than 2 standard deviations away from the trend. Over the five elections the actual percentage of polls this far away ranges from 4.7 to 5.9 percent, with an average of 5.3 percent. In 2016 so far, what percent of the polls are outliers, by this standard: 5.3 percent. There is no evidence that 2016 is producing more outliers than previous campaign polls. Moreover, the variation in the polls isn’t increasing over time. The standard deviation of the residuals — which captures this variation — hasn’t become larger year over year. And 2016 is not out of line with previous years. If polling were seriously broken, or exhibiting wild fluctuations, we would expect to see more variability this year than previously. We do not. Another way to look at the variation is to plot the distribution of deviations from the trend for each year. If some years are markedly different from others we should see that in the figure. Specifically we should see a wider, or “fatter,” distribution for 2016 compared to previous years if polls have developed more “wild fluctuations.” [Graph](http://imgur.com/vwtad2S.jpg) There is not much difference among the five election years. The standard deviation varies a bit, but there is no evidence that “one of these is not like the others.” There is no statistically significant difference in the variance of 2016 polling compared to that of previous years. If we take all five years of polling together, a few rules of thumb emerge for how often we see polls far from the overall trend. Rounding a bit and making the range symmetric for simplicity, a pretty good summary of the polls is this: Half of the polls are within +/- 2 points of the trend. 75% of the polls are within +/- 3.4 points of the trend. 90% of the polls are within +/- 5.2 points of the trend 95% of the polls are within +/- 6.4 points of the trend So if you see a poll that is 5 points or more away from the trend, it may well turn out to be an outlier. But variation within 3 points of the trend is pretty common. So when the trend is, say, +2 for a candidate, expect to see most polls fall between -1 and +5. The -1 isn’t an outlier and neither is the +5. Both are consistent with a +2 race. But a -4 or a +8 should arouse some doubt. The thing about trends is they can change. What looks like an outlier today could be the first poll picking up a shift in support. But until it is joined by other polls, together moving the trend estimate, be skeptical. Telling an outlier from a harbinger is nearly impossible based on a single poll. Some patience is required while more data accumulate, certainly a challenge in a world of instant news and analysis. But when two, then three then four polls are all below the previous trend, the evidence becomes more convincing. To be clear, there are real challenges facing the polling industry. But there has been more rhetoric than evidence for the thesis that “polling is broken.” So far, the national polls in 2016 look a great deal like those from the past four presidential elections. Charles Franklin is Director of the Marquette Law School Poll and a Professor of Law and Public Policy at Marquette Law School.', ">>{dicks1jo} : That part is what everyone is focusing on hardest and it's the least of the worries. The manner in which our president gets his rocks off is inconsequential as long as it involves 100% consenting parties who are not his immediate relatives. The other stuff in the document tying him to potentially hostile foreign powers on the other hand is concerning. Even so, this is a country in which we embrace due process.", '>>{MostlyCarbonite} : I guess that\'s fair. We can re-spin it to: "A few anecdotes are a poor substitute for actual data."', ">>{And-So-On-And-So-On} : Unless it's gay sex, or literal rape, it literally won't matter to his supporters.", '>>{Megaloman71} : His wife is a former Slovenian prostitute. No one is shocked by this.', ">>{Megaloman71} : It won't matter that he's been lying and scrambling to cover it up? Not to mention colluding with a hostile foreign government. But yeah, nothing to see here.", '>>{OnceYouGoSlack} : Be careful trying to classify the limits of loyalty.', '>>{Drunkenmoba} : But Math: https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2016/03/16/five-democratic-primaries-exit-poll-discrepancies-and-win-probabilities/ Yes, this guy comes off a bit crazy, but his math checks out. In short, there is a nasty discrepancy in exit polls that would say: The exit polls are not broken, the results are.', '>>{dinvgamma} : Two remarks: first, Franklin (in the article I posted) is talking about polls, not exit polls. Second, it\'s far, far more likely that exit polls are off due to mis-weighting. For a good discussion of how weights can skew predicted results, read the British Polling Council\'s recent [analysis](http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/3789/1/Report_final_revised.pdf) of the 2015 general election, in which the opposite happened (polls were wrong, exit polls were right). Edit: actually, let me expand, having spent more time on the site you linked, since I\'ve heard a lot of this from Sanders supporters. The problem is that he\'s assuming that the exit polls are a perfect random sample of all voters. If this were true, then the observed probability of the results, given the exit polls, would indeed be very improbable. (Though even then, it would be false to conclude that there\'s X% probability it was fraud; there\'s no evidence of any specific mechanisms producing an improbable outcome.) But we know that the exit polls aren\'t accurate reflections of voting behavior, for at least two reasons. First, we know that HRC wins handily in mail-ins, but Bernie does better on election day. Exit polls won\'t capture anyone who voted ahead of time, skewing the results toward Bernie. Second, exit polls are typically biased toward a candidate whose supporters are more vocal/enthusiastic about their candidate, since they\'re more willing to take the time to fill out the slip saying whom they voted for. Again, in this context, that produces bias toward Bernie. This is why social scientists like myself have jobs. "The math" is not devoid of context. We need to understand what\'s going on with the data before we can start performing any statistical tests.', '>>{MarbhDamhsa} : [The gut]( http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/could-michigan-change-the-course-of-the-gop-race/) > Then again, I have a gut feeling — WHICH YOU SHOULD TOTALLY IGNORE — that Sanders could beat his polling there.', '>>{weightloss89} : It\'s funny how some people aren\'t trying to be like, "There\'s evidence that undocumented immigrants are registered to vote," as if that\'s evidence that this statement from Trump: "In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally" is true.', ">>{n0whereman} : Your analysis is quite interesting and I think you make some great points. However, why would exit polling be so grossly off for Democrats in these races and be nearly spot on for Republicans? If you look at the exit polling from may of the races this election cycle, this is pretty much what happened. I am genuinely interested in what might cause this if it is not fraud. Seemingly, Trump produces a similar degree of enthusiasm among his supporters as Bernie does for his supporters. If it's truly the enthusiastic supporters skewing the numbers shouldn't there be skew in exit polling for both Bernie and Trump? Article detailing exit polling results and discrepancies: https://medium.com/@spencergundert/hillary-clinton-and-electoral-fraud-992ad9e080f6#.74zuwf7w8", ">>{dinvgamma} : Well, most simply, they're just different elections and different electorates. First, it's much easier to get a good sense of delegate math in winner-take-all states, so we just don't notice as much when exit polls are off by 5 percentage points but it doesn't affect who got all of the delegates. In Democratic contests, that 5pp could produce big swings in the delegate math. In addition, the GOP contests have been more lopsided: if you predict 37 Trump, 13 Cruz, 4 Kasich and miss by about 10pp, you still have a clear Trump win. If you predict 55 HRC and 45 Bernie and you're off by 10pp, you might get a Bernie win. Second, it's much harder to predict turnout among the Democratic electorate. GOP voters -- mainly, but not exclusively, middle and upper class white people -- turn out at pretty consistent rates. So if you know their preferences, you have a good sense of what the vote breakdown will look like. Democratic voting blocs (blacks, latinos, poor people, young people) are typically much harder to predict. They turn up in presidential years but not mid-terms, they show up for charismatic candidates (Obama) but not necessarily others (Gore), etc. These factors make it harder to weight the exit polls to match who you think voted.", '>>{n0whereman} : Thanks for the breakdown, I really appreciate the response! The more disparate electorate for democrats leading to less predictable exit polling does make a good bit of logical sense. However, in many of these contests the end results have been off by greater than the margin of error for the exit polls. Could the reason for such discrepancies really be boiled down to an inhomogeneous electorate? How much would you expect absentee voting to also play into final results? There were articles posted earlier this election season regarding Clinton being heavily favored in absentee voting.', '>>{NoNewsizBadnews} : Is this like the ex-Secret Service agent who claims Hillary was a rampaging satanist lesbian?', ">>{GrumpyBearBank} : So if he was getting an answer from an undocumented immigrant that they voted, couldn't he just call the Feds and local authorities and start a state abd federal criminal investigation.", ">>{Drunkenmoba} : Okay, that is a given. In fact this guy had an interview over at Redacted Tonight: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmYYvZASoks He even addresses and talks about your points. More fun, let us take New York primary (one of the best ones for bad skewing), the early voting in NY is one of the hardest because it still requires IN PERSON voting with Judge Approval (in short you go to vote, get a judge to say 'yeah you're too old to come out and wait in lines' and bam, but still not a short trip).", '>>{dinvgamma} : To be clear, to my knowledge, the margin of error (MoE) doesn\'t take into account the things I\'ve just said. MoE is a function of sample size and variation in the observed data, but the issues I raised are essentially sampling/measurement error. Let\'s say a prediction has a MoE of +/-4pp, but turns out to be off by 8pp. Then your question is better understood as asking: "could [weighting problems] account for 4pp, to make the outcome within the MoE?" And to this I say: absolutely. I think absentee voting alone could account for 4-6pp, even without the enthusiasm gap.', '>>{salisburymistake} : > Because some states only require a drivers license number to be recorded to register to vote, or apply for an absentee ballot, the illegal registrations "are not necessarily picked up," he said. If this is true then the problem is much, much bigger than they think. **Anyone** would be able to shit out random DL numbers and be able to vote multiple times. PACs, lobbyists, corporations, etc. That\'s infinitely more terrifying to me.', ">>{gamechanger55} : prob cause you're not a celebrity and haven't slept with Russian prostitutes under the eyes of the kremlin which see's no inherent value in blackmailing a no name", '>>{winstonjpenobscot} : One guy against many actual investigations into elections by professionals who have no financial interest in the outcome: Believe the guy. Many professional scientists observe actual global climate change versus industry hacks who have a financial interest in denying global climate change: Believe the hacks. A pattern.', '>>{outbackqueen} : It just says the "document is not an U.S. Intelligence Community product and that I do not believe the leaks came from within the IC" I think we all know that someone in Russia and in consequence MI6 has the real dirt on Trump.', ">>{zogo13} : No but it proves that the report is at least partially true. If that's the case the floodgates are open.", ">>{AbstractTeserract} : All voter registrations are public record in the United States. That's more than 100,000,000 people. Yet, no one can seem to find all these illegal immigrants who bothered to register to vote. Funny how that works, huh?", ">>{Caveat-Emperor} : Show us these voter registrations then. Didn't take a photo of them with your phone, guy? Proof or it didn't happen.", '>>{MeineMeinungen} : Honestly, it wouldn\'t matter to me and I hate the guy. If it was assault or sex with someone under-aged, of course I would but he\'s a billionaire whose "marriage" to a significantly younger woman is a complete dog and pony show. I think your sexual habits, as long as they\'re legal, say absolutely nothing about your qualifications for the presidency. My problem is that he has absolutely zero of those and he makes a progressively larger ass of himself and my country every single day. Edit: Of course, if the reports of collusion are true, then I would care that the president elect participated in high treason.', '>>{gonzoparenting} : Totally agree. I am also curious as to what a "voter registration card" is.', '>>{dyncon} : Fake news? Oh, something like the birth issue with Obama? Donald, you slithering little worm. Go back to your hole and suck on your other end.', '>>{jellicle} : Crazy that none of these people he describes were ever criminally charged.', ">>{cannonfunk} : I don't give a damn if Trump gets off by having clowns shit on his chest. Something tells me right-wingers would have a problem with it (because it's not missionary sex with his spouse), but as long as the clowns are okay with it, so am I. What I *do* give a damn about is our country, and his resistance in selling it out to the highest bidder or whoever has dirt on him. If this Russia business is true, and Trump remains in power, we're looking at the beginning of the fabled [*new world order*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Order_(conspiracy_theory), and republican voters are complicit in its formation.", ">>{jellicle} : Fox has gone full fake news at this point. They're not even pretending any more.", ">>{MeineMeinungen} : Jesus Christ, I hadn't seen that tweet yet. I can't wait for this nightmare to be over.", ">>{Seinfeldologist} : Not to mention the Howard Stern tape circulating. In 2001 some guy called Donny out on Sterns show for going to Russia to do perverted things. It's not damning by any means but it's interesting in this context.", ">>{zablyzibly} : He did make a snide comment when the BBC reporter asked his question. Trump said something snotty about not being crazy about the BBC but he'll take their question anyway.", '>>{beermile} : Actually I am and both times were with Russian prostitutes. But otherwise you are right.', '>>{gaeuvyen} : the card you get that comes in the mail after registering to vote.', ">>{CatButler} : Who the fuck carries their voter registration card? In our state, it's completely meaningless and not required to vote.", ">>{sedgwickian} : You want to trade a cali recount for a Florida recount? I'd make that trade!", ">>{Claritypleas} : Yeah, because undocumented people just walk around with voter registrations on them. I mysef don't ever leave home without mine, and I'm sure you don't either. Silly.", '>>{crazyinsane65} : Aj bensa said Donald trump told him that "Russian girls have no morals"', ">>{soalone34} : All this rumor stuff is great and all but it would be nice for any of these to be actually verified or to , I don't know... GET THE TAPE?", '>>{daybreaker} : fine, you guys raise the money, and recount CA too. Spoilers: you wont find millions of illegal voters.', ">>{Zannyth} : That's what I'm talking about. There are none with actual evidence lol", ">>{foooood4thought} : Precisely. Where are the criminal charges...?? Fox News is reporting this as if it's a fact. People seem to have forgotten just how bad Fox really is.", ">>{gonzoparenting} : Ive been registered for so long I don't even remember getting a card!", '>>{gonzone} : He easily identified them as they were always wearing red MAGA trucker caps.', '>>{Zannyth} : A lot of people, but they lost a shit ton of viewers after this election coverage fuck up', ">>{gonzoparenting} : Cali takes so many precautions that they haven't even finished counting from the election!", '>>{smoothmedia} : The key thing here is that the dossier can be "accurate" without the intelligence actually being true. Simply because FSA agents claim to have Kompromat does not actually mean they do. The dossier is a collection of information that is known in intelligence circles, but it isn\'t ironclad true.', '>>{Kalel2319} : Jesus. So Fox News is chasing Trump to rock bottom eh?', '>>{Circumin} : Donny on tape also talking about loving to barge in unannounced in the changing rooms at Miss Universe.', '>>{Huck77} : Yeah there are penalties for voting as a noncitizen.', ">>{Circumin} : I'm not sure literal rape would even do much to overturn his core support. Maybe it would. I hope it would, but I'm not positive about that.", ">>{FromZiraCameCaesar} : Except they can't because your registration is then checked through multiple databases. Give them a fake DL#, for example, and you end up not being registered. And you can't vote multiple times because once you register you get a specific polling place to vote at. You can't register with a Manhattan address and vote in Albany", ">>{Bhantl01} : You really can't figure out what /u/Susarian is referencing?", ">>{Circumin} : Isn't this a Murdoch tabloid? I do think Trump allies will be posting actual fake stories in order to try to associate their fake stories with real journalism in order to discredit all Trump stories. Be careful. I think that is what is happening here", '>>{speaktodragons} : No, really sometimes I have a hard time deciphering **two word** sentences. People really need to stop using down voting like if they were sugaring their coffee. Take it face value at this moment, I have no clue.', '>>{dolphins3} : I thought it was Miss Teen Universe, which is kind of worse.', ">>{1000000students} : TRUMP: I won in a landslide ALSO TRUMP: Millions of people voted illegally SOMEHOW ALSO TRUMP: Please don't check tho", ">>{mauxly} : They have the eyes of God, and the perception of Man. They have the ability to view nearly all we do. They don't have the ability to see. They've convinced themselves that big data and technology can suss it out. They are wrong. Big data and technology is very good at finding patterns. It's very shit at identifying individuals who know about it and cover. That's why the IC is fabulous at thwarting domestic terrorist attacks planned by foreign operatives. And shit at thwarting loan wolves that independently pledge allegiance to said operatives. We've been so focused on potential acts of terror by foes abroad, we've lost sight of the economic/political enemy within. EDIT; Two clarifying words - economic/political.", '>>{gaeuvyen} : i get a new one every 2 years because my county sends them out as they double as a form to change parties before you actually vote or get sample ballots.', ">>{outbackqueen} : [McCain is not thought to have made a judgment on the reliability of the documents but was sufficiently impressed by the source’s credentials to feel obliged to pass them to the FBI.](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/10/fbi-chief-given-dossier-by-john-mccain-alleging-secret-trump-russia-contacts) I guess that's all we now for now", '>>{outbackqueen} : [You can read more about it via Paul Wood on BBC news](http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38589427)', '>>{Circumin} : I think you might be right. Although it probably was both', '>>{Popalopahop} : The IC has not made any judgment that the information in this document is reliable, and we did not rely upon it in any way for our conclusions', '>>{outbackqueen} : So? It neither confirms nor denies the validity of the information.', ">>{Zannyth} : The tape in question doesn't have him admitting to doing it, only saying it's something he could do. If you're trying to make a claim against someone, you have to provide evidence that they did what you are saying, they don't have to provide evidence that they didn't. Funny try though.", ">>{Zannyth} : No and oddly I haven't heard that all election. What are you defining court records as? A claim against him that he wasn't charged with? You guys sure hate providing sources that prove he did what you claim he did don't you?", ">>{Zannyth} : I haven't heard it because it turns out even your sources say it wasn't a thing. Trump denied it, ex retracted comment. You're making an assumption in your last statement.", ">>{Popalopahop} : You're a crazy conspiracy theorist if you believe this."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{dinvgamma} : The polls are not broken. Say it again. The polls are not broken.', ">>{dinvgamma} : Written by political scientist Charles Franklin. Full disclosure: he's a former colleague of mine. (He and his wife make dope brisket.)", '>>{premodernism} : Holy shit Charles Franklin is poll geek royalty from back before HuffPo ruined Pollster. You used to be able to go there and get heavy scientific and mathematical insight into how polls worked and what happened when they failed. The brisket thing just makes me love him more.', ">>{loki8481} : outside of Michigan, the polls have seemed pretty normal this year. the major problems have been pundits like Nate Silver, when he dons his pundit hats, ignoring them just because they don't fit some historical narrative.", ">>{meowwschwitz} : Anyone care to copy/paste for those of us who can't get beyond the pay wall?", ">>{Bardamuze} : If you have to use a indoctrination technique (repeating something so it becomes internalized) to convince people the polls ain't broken, something definitely is broken.", ">>{dinvgamma} : I generally don't have a problem if I just use private browsing. And the biggest impact of the article is in the figures, which aren't amenable to copy-paste... but I hope someone is able to upload screenshots to imgur for you", '>>{jampekka} : This seems a bit bizarre way of studying if "polls are not broken". Sure, the polls quite reliably compare to the average of polls, but the real question of interest is of course, whether the average is close to the result. In statistics it\'s quite a basic thing that it doesn\'t matter if a measurement is reliable, if it\'s not valid. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Validity_(statistics)', ">>{pktron} : The first wave of comments here, while the post is still New, gives some insight into the paranoid delusions that have flooded /r/politics over the last few months. Everything is broken! The election is stolen! Primary polls aren't that good for a bunch of reasons, but it isn't because they are fundamentally broken or biased.", '>>{DexySP} : Are there any good polling sites, or even aggregator. The only one I can think of is 538 which honestly from seeing it before and now, looks as if they have stopped with science (more or less).. and rather focused on opinion also /u/dinvgamma do you happen to have the brisket recipe at any chance?', ">>{premodernism} : I don't know that it's Silver's pundit hat causing him trouble, he is trying to model instead of aggregate. There's a lot of theory suggesting that the bias introduced by modeling outweighs any benefit it brings in poll-over-poll accuracy. [Read Sam Wang as a starter](http://election.princeton.edu/2012/11/04/comparisons-among-aggregators-and-modelers/), he's good on this sort of thing.", ">>{pktron} : Which of their primary models do you think they've been opinion pieces on?", '>>{premodernism} : Princeton Election Consortium at http://election.princeton.edu/ Pollster still aggregates fairly well, but all of the good commentary and teaching that they used to do disappeared and is sorely missed.', '>>{DexySP} : well technically its not wrong, information takes a while to spread sometimes. But it still shouldnt in reality account for such heavy weighting', '>>{MarbhDamhsa} : Well, there was Michigan. The night of the election, he indicated that Bernie could beat the polling based on nothing but a gut feeling.', ">>{marshmcdan} : >There is no evidence that the variation in residuals has changed substantially since 2000. The variation tends to decrease closer to elections but the overall spread of the residuals has been relatively consistent across the five elections, including 2016 so far. He goes on to say how mathematically consistent polls have been since then. Isn't that just confirming that they started to really fix the polls after the bush/gore 2000 debacle? I'm not saying it's every poll/voting booth, not everyone everywhere, but politics is death by a thousand cuts. What a great alibi to have it be so consistent", ">>{dinvgamma} : Sorry, no recipe! He just hosted a reading group one week. As for which sites: I'm not sure, but I'll say this. I, and all of my quant poli sci colleagues, default to 538. For us, it's still the best by a mile. I've also been seeing good predictions from benchmarkpolitics, but frankly I think their methodology is pretty opaque. In the academic community, not being explicit with your model, data, and estimator is cause for concern.", '>>{zan5ki} : Are the polls broken? A steady stream of articles over the past nine months has examined the challenges of the polling industry, pointing to highly visible failures, the rise of cell phones and the decline of response rates. And indeed, in Michigan and Indiana the polls were wrong for the Democratic primary, although not for the Republican primary. These articles raise some good points. Reporting does tend to seize on the most surprising poll which is, in fact, more likely an outlier than harbinger of a dramatic new trend. And there are technical and economic issues affecting the polling industry that are cause for serious concern. Yet for all the claims of broken polls, little direct evidence has been provided. Yes, response rates are down but has accuracy suffered as a result? Yes, polls differ from one another, but are “wild fluctuations” more common? I’ve examined all the presidential general election polling since 2000 — which is 2,056 polls in all. These data tell a very different story, however. The polls aren’t “broken” after all. The graph below plots the Democratic candidate’s share minus the Republican candidate’s share. Each gray point is a poll. The blue line is a trend — estimates via what is called “local regression”— that tracks the polling average over the election. [Graph](http://i.imgur.com/zmJn52b.jpg) The most important point is that the gray dots, the individual polls, are scattered around the trend line. This scatter is the measure of how much variation we get from the polls beyond what is due to the changes in trend over time. On any given day, some polls are above the trend and some below. This means one can always find “disagreement” among the polls. And when the trend is close to zero — that is, close to a tied race — then we find some polls with one party ahead and some with the other ahead. But how variable are the polls around the trend, and has this variation become larger, as the claim that polling is broken or wildly variable would suggest? To answer that question, subtract the trend estimate on the day the poll was completed from the poll result. This is called the “residual” and is a measure of the deviation of each poll from the trend. If polls have become increasingly unreliable over the past 16 years, we should see more variation around the trend, and the residuals should become more spread out in recent elections compared to earlier ones. If 2016 is especially bad for polls, this year should be clearly more variable. The next graph plots the residuals against time for each election. [Graph](http://imgur.com/SuWeC6c.jpg) There is no evidence that the variation in residuals has changed substantially since 2000. The variation tends to decrease closer to elections but the overall spread of the residuals has been relatively consistent across the five elections, including 2016 so far. Are current polls producing more outliers — that is, results further from the trend than we would expect due to normal sampling variation? If the residuals were perfectly normally distributed —that is, they precisely followed a “bell curve”— we would expect 5 percent of the polls to be more than 2 standard deviations away from the trend. Over the five elections the actual percentage of polls this far away ranges from 4.7 to 5.9 percent, with an average of 5.3 percent. In 2016 so far, what percent of the polls are outliers, by this standard: 5.3 percent. There is no evidence that 2016 is producing more outliers than previous campaign polls. Moreover, the variation in the polls isn’t increasing over time. The standard deviation of the residuals — which captures this variation — hasn’t become larger year over year. And 2016 is not out of line with previous years. If polling were seriously broken, or exhibiting wild fluctuations, we would expect to see more variability this year than previously. We do not. Another way to look at the variation is to plot the distribution of deviations from the trend for each year. If some years are markedly different from others we should see that in the figure. Specifically we should see a wider, or “fatter,” distribution for 2016 compared to previous years if polls have developed more “wild fluctuations.” [Graph](http://imgur.com/vwtad2S.jpg) There is not much difference among the five election years. The standard deviation varies a bit, but there is no evidence that “one of these is not like the others.” There is no statistically significant difference in the variance of 2016 polling compared to that of previous years. If we take all five years of polling together, a few rules of thumb emerge for how often we see polls far from the overall trend. Rounding a bit and making the range symmetric for simplicity, a pretty good summary of the polls is this: Half of the polls are within +/- 2 points of the trend. 75% of the polls are within +/- 3.4 points of the trend. 90% of the polls are within +/- 5.2 points of the trend 95% of the polls are within +/- 6.4 points of the trend So if you see a poll that is 5 points or more away from the trend, it may well turn out to be an outlier. But variation within 3 points of the trend is pretty common. So when the trend is, say, +2 for a candidate, expect to see most polls fall between -1 and +5. The -1 isn’t an outlier and neither is the +5. Both are consistent with a +2 race. But a -4 or a +8 should arouse some doubt. The thing about trends is they can change. What looks like an outlier today could be the first poll picking up a shift in support. But until it is joined by other polls, together moving the trend estimate, be skeptical. Telling an outlier from a harbinger is nearly impossible based on a single poll. Some patience is required while more data accumulate, certainly a challenge in a world of instant news and analysis. But when two, then three then four polls are all below the previous trend, the evidence becomes more convincing. To be clear, there are real challenges facing the polling industry. But there has been more rhetoric than evidence for the thesis that “polling is broken.” So far, the national polls in 2016 look a great deal like those from the past four presidential elections. Charles Franklin is Director of the Marquette Law School Poll and a Professor of Law and Public Policy at Marquette Law School.', '>>{Drunkenmoba} : But Math: https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2016/03/16/five-democratic-primaries-exit-poll-discrepancies-and-win-probabilities/ Yes, this guy comes off a bit crazy, but his math checks out. In short, there is a nasty discrepancy in exit polls that would say: The exit polls are not broken, the results are.', '>>{dinvgamma} : Two remarks: first, Franklin (in the article I posted) is talking about polls, not exit polls. Second, it\'s far, far more likely that exit polls are off due to mis-weighting. For a good discussion of how weights can skew predicted results, read the British Polling Council\'s recent [analysis](http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/3789/1/Report_final_revised.pdf) of the 2015 general election, in which the opposite happened (polls were wrong, exit polls were right). Edit: actually, let me expand, having spent more time on the site you linked, since I\'ve heard a lot of this from Sanders supporters. The problem is that he\'s assuming that the exit polls are a perfect random sample of all voters. If this were true, then the observed probability of the results, given the exit polls, would indeed be very improbable. (Though even then, it would be false to conclude that there\'s X% probability it was fraud; there\'s no evidence of any specific mechanisms producing an improbable outcome.) But we know that the exit polls aren\'t accurate reflections of voting behavior, for at least two reasons. First, we know that HRC wins handily in mail-ins, but Bernie does better on election day. Exit polls won\'t capture anyone who voted ahead of time, skewing the results toward Bernie. Second, exit polls are typically biased toward a candidate whose supporters are more vocal/enthusiastic about their candidate, since they\'re more willing to take the time to fill out the slip saying whom they voted for. Again, in this context, that produces bias toward Bernie. This is why social scientists like myself have jobs. "The math" is not devoid of context. We need to understand what\'s going on with the data before we can start performing any statistical tests.', '>>{MarbhDamhsa} : [The gut]( http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/could-michigan-change-the-course-of-the-gop-race/) > Then again, I have a gut feeling — WHICH YOU SHOULD TOTALLY IGNORE — that Sanders could beat his polling there.', ">>{n0whereman} : Your analysis is quite interesting and I think you make some great points. However, why would exit polling be so grossly off for Democrats in these races and be nearly spot on for Republicans? If you look at the exit polling from may of the races this election cycle, this is pretty much what happened. I am genuinely interested in what might cause this if it is not fraud. Seemingly, Trump produces a similar degree of enthusiasm among his supporters as Bernie does for his supporters. If it's truly the enthusiastic supporters skewing the numbers shouldn't there be skew in exit polling for both Bernie and Trump? Article detailing exit polling results and discrepancies: https://medium.com/@spencergundert/hillary-clinton-and-electoral-fraud-992ad9e080f6#.74zuwf7w8", ">>{dinvgamma} : Well, most simply, they're just different elections and different electorates. First, it's much easier to get a good sense of delegate math in winner-take-all states, so we just don't notice as much when exit polls are off by 5 percentage points but it doesn't affect who got all of the delegates. In Democratic contests, that 5pp could produce big swings in the delegate math. In addition, the GOP contests have been more lopsided: if you predict 37 Trump, 13 Cruz, 4 Kasich and miss by about 10pp, you still have a clear Trump win. If you predict 55 HRC and 45 Bernie and you're off by 10pp, you might get a Bernie win. Second, it's much harder to predict turnout among the Democratic electorate. GOP voters -- mainly, but not exclusively, middle and upper class white people -- turn out at pretty consistent rates. So if you know their preferences, you have a good sense of what the vote breakdown will look like. Democratic voting blocs (blacks, latinos, poor people, young people) are typically much harder to predict. They turn up in presidential years but not mid-terms, they show up for charismatic candidates (Obama) but not necessarily others (Gore), etc. These factors make it harder to weight the exit polls to match who you think voted.", '>>{n0whereman} : Thanks for the breakdown, I really appreciate the response! The more disparate electorate for democrats leading to less predictable exit polling does make a good bit of logical sense. However, in many of these contests the end results have been off by greater than the margin of error for the exit polls. Could the reason for such discrepancies really be boiled down to an inhomogeneous electorate? How much would you expect absentee voting to also play into final results? There were articles posted earlier this election season regarding Clinton being heavily favored in absentee voting.', ">>{Drunkenmoba} : Okay, that is a given. In fact this guy had an interview over at Redacted Tonight: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmYYvZASoks He even addresses and talks about your points. More fun, let us take New York primary (one of the best ones for bad skewing), the early voting in NY is one of the hardest because it still requires IN PERSON voting with Judge Approval (in short you go to vote, get a judge to say 'yeah you're too old to come out and wait in lines' and bam, but still not a short trip).", '>>{dinvgamma} : To be clear, to my knowledge, the margin of error (MoE) doesn\'t take into account the things I\'ve just said. MoE is a function of sample size and variation in the observed data, but the issues I raised are essentially sampling/measurement error. Let\'s say a prediction has a MoE of +/-4pp, but turns out to be off by 8pp. Then your question is better understood as asking: "could [weighting problems] account for 4pp, to make the outcome within the MoE?" And to this I say: absolutely. I think absentee voting alone could account for 4-6pp, even without the enthusiasm gap.'], [">>{speaktodragons} : Ex-ICE Agent: I 'Routinely' Arrested Illegal Immigrants with Voter Registrations", '>>{Bhantl01} : All the more reason to do a nation-wide election audit!', ">>{pissbum-emeritus} : >Ex-ICE Agent: I Routinely Tell Bald-Faced Lies in Exchange for 'Consulting Fees'", '>>{SaltHash} : GOP/Fox TV wants their viewers to question everything and everybody except their unsubstantiated claims.', '>>{pabange} : Good point. I call for a full and immediate recount of Fla. 😁', ">>{speaktodragons} : Name one what? I asked a question, what's the problem?", '>>{MostlyCarbonite} : I guess that\'s fair. We can re-spin it to: "A few anecdotes are a poor substitute for actual data."', '>>{weightloss89} : It\'s funny how some people aren\'t trying to be like, "There\'s evidence that undocumented immigrants are registered to vote," as if that\'s evidence that this statement from Trump: "In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally" is true.', '>>{NoNewsizBadnews} : Is this like the ex-Secret Service agent who claims Hillary was a rampaging satanist lesbian?', ">>{GrumpyBearBank} : So if he was getting an answer from an undocumented immigrant that they voted, couldn't he just call the Feds and local authorities and start a state abd federal criminal investigation.", '>>{salisburymistake} : > Because some states only require a drivers license number to be recorded to register to vote, or apply for an absentee ballot, the illegal registrations "are not necessarily picked up," he said. If this is true then the problem is much, much bigger than they think. **Anyone** would be able to shit out random DL numbers and be able to vote multiple times. PACs, lobbyists, corporations, etc. That\'s infinitely more terrifying to me.', '>>{winstonjpenobscot} : One guy against many actual investigations into elections by professionals who have no financial interest in the outcome: Believe the guy. Many professional scientists observe actual global climate change versus industry hacks who have a financial interest in denying global climate change: Believe the hacks. A pattern.', ">>{AbstractTeserract} : All voter registrations are public record in the United States. That's more than 100,000,000 people. Yet, no one can seem to find all these illegal immigrants who bothered to register to vote. Funny how that works, huh?", ">>{Caveat-Emperor} : Show us these voter registrations then. Didn't take a photo of them with your phone, guy? Proof or it didn't happen.", '>>{gonzoparenting} : Totally agree. I am also curious as to what a "voter registration card" is.', '>>{jellicle} : Crazy that none of these people he describes were ever criminally charged.', ">>{jellicle} : Fox has gone full fake news at this point. They're not even pretending any more.", '>>{gaeuvyen} : the card you get that comes in the mail after registering to vote.', ">>{CatButler} : Who the fuck carries their voter registration card? In our state, it's completely meaningless and not required to vote.", ">>{sedgwickian} : You want to trade a cali recount for a Florida recount? I'd make that trade!", ">>{Claritypleas} : Yeah, because undocumented people just walk around with voter registrations on them. I mysef don't ever leave home without mine, and I'm sure you don't either. Silly.", '>>{daybreaker} : fine, you guys raise the money, and recount CA too. Spoilers: you wont find millions of illegal voters.', ">>{foooood4thought} : Precisely. Where are the criminal charges...?? Fox News is reporting this as if it's a fact. People seem to have forgotten just how bad Fox really is.", ">>{gonzoparenting} : Ive been registered for so long I don't even remember getting a card!", '>>{gonzone} : He easily identified them as they were always wearing red MAGA trucker caps.', ">>{gonzoparenting} : Cali takes so many precautions that they haven't even finished counting from the election!", '>>{Kalel2319} : Jesus. So Fox News is chasing Trump to rock bottom eh?', '>>{Huck77} : Yeah there are penalties for voting as a noncitizen.', ">>{FromZiraCameCaesar} : Except they can't because your registration is then checked through multiple databases. Give them a fake DL#, for example, and you end up not being registered. And you can't vote multiple times because once you register you get a specific polling place to vote at. You can't register with a Manhattan address and vote in Albany", ">>{Bhantl01} : You really can't figure out what /u/Susarian is referencing?", '>>{speaktodragons} : No, really sometimes I have a hard time deciphering **two word** sentences. People really need to stop using down voting like if they were sugaring their coffee. Take it face value at this moment, I have no clue.', ">>{1000000students} : TRUMP: I won in a landslide ALSO TRUMP: Millions of people voted illegally SOMEHOW ALSO TRUMP: Please don't check tho", '>>{gaeuvyen} : i get a new one every 2 years because my county sends them out as they double as a form to change parties before you actually vote or get sample ballots.'], [">>{outbackqueen} : Top BBC foreign correspondent says CIA sources indicated existence of another tape 'of a sexual nature'", ">>{gamechanger55} : why is this surprising news to people when it's pretty obvious that dumpster don has sexually assaulted people", '>>{dolphins3} : I mean, we have him on tape bragging about literally assaulting women, so yeah.', '>>{tau-lepton} : >We also discussed the private security company document, which was widely circulated in recent months among the media, members of Congress and Congressional staff even *before the IC became aware of it.* Just think about that sentence for a second.', '>>{outbackqueen} : True, I can very well imagine him to be a total pervert.', '>>{Zannyth} : So many allegations all election season with literally 0 evidence backing them up. His supporters are all just munching on popcorn watching the media burn itself up. E: *munches popcorn*', '>>{erotic_majesty} : *** extremely yakov smirnoff voice *** In Soviet Russia, pussy grab you', '>>{LanceBelcher} : TBH I was surprised at how tame the alleged dirt was. I really expected there to be a video of him having sex with / murdering a child and not necessarily in that order. I guess the year is still young.', '>>{AmazingAnytime} : The media will never burn itself up. They will still be the loudest voices and they will still get a lot of people to believe them.', '>>{OJSamson} : But donald will never out anything near halfway as good as trapped in the closet.', ">>{CollumMcJingleballs} : [BBC will soon join the ranks of Donald Trump's AXIS OF FAKE NEWS](https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/819393877174087682)", ">>{beermile} : I'm not saying it's surprising, but for most people it's uncommon to have sexual encounters captured with video evidence against the will of the participants. Certainly neither of mine were.", ">>{dicks1jo} : That part is what everyone is focusing on hardest and it's the least of the worries. The manner in which our president gets his rocks off is inconsequential as long as it involves 100% consenting parties who are not his immediate relatives. The other stuff in the document tying him to potentially hostile foreign powers on the other hand is concerning. Even so, this is a country in which we embrace due process.", ">>{And-So-On-And-So-On} : Unless it's gay sex, or literal rape, it literally won't matter to his supporters.", '>>{Megaloman71} : His wife is a former Slovenian prostitute. No one is shocked by this.', ">>{Megaloman71} : It won't matter that he's been lying and scrambling to cover it up? Not to mention colluding with a hostile foreign government. But yeah, nothing to see here.", '>>{OnceYouGoSlack} : Be careful trying to classify the limits of loyalty.', ">>{gamechanger55} : prob cause you're not a celebrity and haven't slept with Russian prostitutes under the eyes of the kremlin which see's no inherent value in blackmailing a no name", '>>{outbackqueen} : It just says the "document is not an U.S. Intelligence Community product and that I do not believe the leaks came from within the IC" I think we all know that someone in Russia and in consequence MI6 has the real dirt on Trump.', ">>{zogo13} : No but it proves that the report is at least partially true. If that's the case the floodgates are open.", '>>{MeineMeinungen} : Honestly, it wouldn\'t matter to me and I hate the guy. If it was assault or sex with someone under-aged, of course I would but he\'s a billionaire whose "marriage" to a significantly younger woman is a complete dog and pony show. I think your sexual habits, as long as they\'re legal, say absolutely nothing about your qualifications for the presidency. My problem is that he has absolutely zero of those and he makes a progressively larger ass of himself and my country every single day. Edit: Of course, if the reports of collusion are true, then I would care that the president elect participated in high treason.', '>>{dyncon} : Fake news? Oh, something like the birth issue with Obama? Donald, you slithering little worm. Go back to your hole and suck on your other end.', ">>{cannonfunk} : I don't give a damn if Trump gets off by having clowns shit on his chest. Something tells me right-wingers would have a problem with it (because it's not missionary sex with his spouse), but as long as the clowns are okay with it, so am I. What I *do* give a damn about is our country, and his resistance in selling it out to the highest bidder or whoever has dirt on him. If this Russia business is true, and Trump remains in power, we're looking at the beginning of the fabled [*new world order*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Order_(conspiracy_theory), and republican voters are complicit in its formation.", ">>{MeineMeinungen} : Jesus Christ, I hadn't seen that tweet yet. I can't wait for this nightmare to be over.", ">>{Seinfeldologist} : Not to mention the Howard Stern tape circulating. In 2001 some guy called Donny out on Sterns show for going to Russia to do perverted things. It's not damning by any means but it's interesting in this context.", ">>{zablyzibly} : He did make a snide comment when the BBC reporter asked his question. Trump said something snotty about not being crazy about the BBC but he'll take their question anyway.", '>>{beermile} : Actually I am and both times were with Russian prostitutes. But otherwise you are right.', '>>{crazyinsane65} : Aj bensa said Donald trump told him that "Russian girls have no morals"', ">>{soalone34} : All this rumor stuff is great and all but it would be nice for any of these to be actually verified or to , I don't know... GET THE TAPE?", ">>{Zannyth} : That's what I'm talking about. There are none with actual evidence lol", '>>{Zannyth} : A lot of people, but they lost a shit ton of viewers after this election coverage fuck up', '>>{smoothmedia} : The key thing here is that the dossier can be "accurate" without the intelligence actually being true. Simply because FSA agents claim to have Kompromat does not actually mean they do. The dossier is a collection of information that is known in intelligence circles, but it isn\'t ironclad true.', '>>{Circumin} : Donny on tape also talking about loving to barge in unannounced in the changing rooms at Miss Universe.', ">>{Circumin} : I'm not sure literal rape would even do much to overturn his core support. Maybe it would. I hope it would, but I'm not positive about that.", ">>{Circumin} : Isn't this a Murdoch tabloid? I do think Trump allies will be posting actual fake stories in order to try to associate their fake stories with real journalism in order to discredit all Trump stories. Be careful. I think that is what is happening here", '>>{dolphins3} : I thought it was Miss Teen Universe, which is kind of worse.', ">>{mauxly} : They have the eyes of God, and the perception of Man. They have the ability to view nearly all we do. They don't have the ability to see. They've convinced themselves that big data and technology can suss it out. They are wrong. Big data and technology is very good at finding patterns. It's very shit at identifying individuals who know about it and cover. That's why the IC is fabulous at thwarting domestic terrorist attacks planned by foreign operatives. And shit at thwarting loan wolves that independently pledge allegiance to said operatives. We've been so focused on potential acts of terror by foes abroad, we've lost sight of the economic/political enemy within. EDIT; Two clarifying words - economic/political.", ">>{outbackqueen} : [McCain is not thought to have made a judgment on the reliability of the documents but was sufficiently impressed by the source’s credentials to feel obliged to pass them to the FBI.](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/10/fbi-chief-given-dossier-by-john-mccain-alleging-secret-trump-russia-contacts) I guess that's all we now for now", '>>{outbackqueen} : [You can read more about it via Paul Wood on BBC news](http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38589427)', '>>{Circumin} : I think you might be right. Although it probably was both', '>>{Popalopahop} : The IC has not made any judgment that the information in this document is reliable, and we did not rely upon it in any way for our conclusions', '>>{outbackqueen} : So? It neither confirms nor denies the validity of the information.', ">>{Zannyth} : The tape in question doesn't have him admitting to doing it, only saying it's something he could do. If you're trying to make a claim against someone, you have to provide evidence that they did what you are saying, they don't have to provide evidence that they didn't. Funny try though.", ">>{Zannyth} : No and oddly I haven't heard that all election. What are you defining court records as? A claim against him that he wasn't charged with? You guys sure hate providing sources that prove he did what you claim he did don't you?", ">>{Zannyth} : I haven't heard it because it turns out even your sources say it wasn't a thing. Trump denied it, ex retracted comment. You're making an assumption in your last statement.", ">>{Popalopahop} : You're a crazy conspiracy theorist if you believe this."]]

classify and reply

['>>{sindinha} : [HELP] Bought iPhone 7 yesterday and the camera are defective.', '>>{Cedarsprings28} : Try a restore. If it still happens, try it in a different room or outside. Perhaps you have some type of light interference. If still no luck, take it back.', '>>{Macnets} : Definitely make an appointment at an Apple store and they will replace it.', '>>{c1a0} : Go to the apple store and get a replacement.', '>>{Whyareallthegoodname} : Very known issue on the HTC One M7. exact issue', '>>{tsdguy} : Sigh. We really have to post this advice?', '>>{AGIANTSMURF} : obviously he means a replacement **camera** for the phone he already has, right?', '>>{lsbussell77} : Yes, this was a huuuge issue on the HTC One M7. My camera was rendered useless by it. It will not get better. It will only ever get worse. Exchange it now.', '>>{sindinha} : Heeeey guys, ty so much for the help, I went to the store and got a brand new one!', ">>{tsdguy} : I don't mind the obvious. It's the IT'S SO OBVIOUS that gets on my nerves a bit. Still it beats /r/Apple which has turned into a cesspool sadly."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{sindinha} : [HELP] Bought iPhone 7 yesterday and the camera are defective.', '>>{Cedarsprings28} : Try a restore. If it still happens, try it in a different room or outside. Perhaps you have some type of light interference. If still no luck, take it back.', '>>{Macnets} : Definitely make an appointment at an Apple store and they will replace it.', '>>{c1a0} : Go to the apple store and get a replacement.', '>>{Whyareallthegoodname} : Very known issue on the HTC One M7. exact issue', '>>{tsdguy} : Sigh. We really have to post this advice?', '>>{AGIANTSMURF} : obviously he means a replacement **camera** for the phone he already has, right?', '>>{lsbussell77} : Yes, this was a huuuge issue on the HTC One M7. My camera was rendered useless by it. It will not get better. It will only ever get worse. Exchange it now.', '>>{sindinha} : Heeeey guys, ty so much for the help, I went to the store and got a brand new one!', ">>{tsdguy} : I don't mind the obvious. It's the IT'S SO OBVIOUS that gets on my nerves a bit. Still it beats /r/Apple which has turned into a cesspool sadly."]]

classify and reply

['>>{CyberIndustrialist} : Europeans are such an interesting group of people. They rape, pillage and destroy nearly the entire planet, but when the repercussions of some immoral conquistador activity fall back on them, they throw a hissy fit.', ">>{supersheesh} : Pennsylvania professor under fire for 'white genocide' tweet", '>>{Topher1999} : iOS 10.3 has great battery life (iPhone 6, new battery)', '>>{MBAMBA0} : Bannon is an idiot and hypocrite, he professes to be a devout Catholic but also has cited Thomas Cromwell as a role model. The point being, Cromwell was one of those in the reign of Henry VIII who worked hard to DISMANTLE the catholic church in England and had Sir Thomas Moore (canonized as a SAINT) executed for refusing to denounce his Catholicism.', '>>{RetroGradeReturn} : I think I noticed the same with the apple watch, mine seems to last longer on the new software. Perhaps a side-effect of the new file system?', ">>{Svviftie} : 9+ hours on a normal 6? Sounds amazing, can't wait to get this on my 6 Plus. The battery life is already insane on that phone, so this is pretty exciting.", '>>{bobtheboffin} : I get 5-6 hours usage on one charge, what kind of apps do you use?', '>>{wanson} : That looks impossible. My 6 barely makes it 3 hours.', '>>{Kenny_Wayne_Shitbird} : Damn, this is getting downvoted bigly. Why does this sub hate white people?', '>>{Healthy_Economist_86} : His tweets seem to indicate a lack of objectivity in regards to his white students. I would move to fire him immediately.', ">>{vuport} : I like how now he says it was a joke. I'm sure he and his social justice friends would be so forgiving of someone saying that about another race, as long as they said they were kidding.", '>>{marrio83} : iPhone 7 plus and my battery is a lot worse after the update', ">>{Lakridspibe} : I was expecting something from Michel Houellebecq. I've read some of his books.", '>>{PM_ME_YOUR_YONI} : I would have expected [*The Turner Diaries*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Turner_Diaries) It\'s every "they comin\' to git yer gunz so you can\'t fight back in the coming RACE WAR!!!111" paranoid fantasy of the extremist American Right. Timothy McVeigh had pages torn out and highlighted from this favorite novel of White Supremacists. He carried them in his pocket to use as instructions for his Oklahoma City bombing. RADICAL. DOMESTIC. TERRORISM. Why can\'t Trump and Bannon say those three simple words? How can we fight the RADICAL. DOMESTIC. TERRORISTS. if Trump/Bannon/Putin won\'t even acknowledge they exist?', '>>{takeashill_pill} : This has been called the immigration analogue to The Turner Diaries.', '>>{kamikazeschaf} : SE here and my battery life got dramatically worse.', ">>{Brian-OBlivion} : I would shoot myself but I don't believe in the right to bear arms....", ">>{ballhardergetmoney} : Thanks for the report. I'm loving my SE on 10.2 and I'm getting all day battery. I won't let apple update my phone to obsolescence.", '>>{NotFooledbyFools} : Look at all the right wing snowflakes wanting a safe space.', ">>{Reneeisme} : How does each new post in this forum manage to make me more nauseous than the last? This is the man whispering trump's ear? This is the man Trump thought fit to serve as an adviser?", '>>{takeashill_pill} : From Wikipedia: >Near the end of the story the mayor of New York City is made to share Gracie Mansion with three families from Harlem, the Queen of the United Kingdom must agree to have her son marry a Pakistani woman, and only one drunken Soviet soldier stands in the way of thousands of Chinese people as they swarm into Siberia. The one holdout until the end of the novel is Switzerland, but by then international pressure isolating it as a rogue state for not opening its borders forces it to capitulate. It should be noted that conservatives at the time, including William F. Buckley, loved it.', '>>{Relevant_Tweets} : **Relevant_Tweets Alert** Tweet from [Don Cheadle](https://twitter.com/DonCheadle/status/838163171055566848): >Hated him [Trump] since he asked my friend\'s father at a Doral pro-am if he\'d ever "f*cked a nigger..." Did it for me ... in response to [Brand Hoffa](https://twitter.com/BrandHoffa/status/838162147108610049): >@DonCheadle I\'ve been following you since you made me laugh with that political boat posing reply. You were Trump hating way before treason.', '>>{Wellbe} : So the left, many of which are white, is not concerned with someone advocating genocide? Please tell me the left does not agree with this?', '>>{crusoe} : Please tell me again how this presidency is not racist when Trump surrounds himself with racists.', '>>{anon902503} : It fills me with genuine dread that this guy is now in a position to cause our country to commit an atrocity that will shame us and our descendants for generations.', '>>{Temp89} : Bannon has also written how France is doomed due to "cross-breeding". You have a pro-genocide, pro-eugenics racist as the second most powerful man in the US.', '>>{itsmegeorge} : Same!!!! Thought I was the only one!!! I would honestly get 2 days off it and now I get a day at best!', '>>{truthhurts4444} : Poor execution. It would have been much funnier if he tried to include it as a Christmas pun, something along the lines of "I\'m Dreaming of a White Genocide"', ">>{devopia} : Bro. My 6s is making 3 1/2 on an average day and 4 if I'm lucky. Way too scared to even upgrade.", ">>{Kulimeya} : I don't know what I'm doing wrong. 10.3 on 6S Plus and I get about 5hrs of usage. When I got it new some weeks ago I reached 10hrs, but after some weeks it got much worse.", ">>{byjimini} : Haven't charged mine since Wednesday night; 40% left as it stands.", '>>{wanson} : Not a whole lot. Interestingly, I just checked it now and for the first time I am getting a message saying that my battery may need to be serviced. I knew that already but the geniuses at the apple store checked it a few weeks ago and said it was good. ¯\\_(ツ)_/¯', ">>{FlatiK} : I got a new battery as well but I'm losing a lot of battery even on standby, everything is turned off and I'm always in low power mode. I'm jealous!", ">>{FlatiK} : Mine was having the same problem, I changed the battery to a new one and it's not getting better.", ">>{davetheninja81} : Initially mine was worse on my 6S, Now I don't notice any difference.", '>>{so--what} : Leftist here. No one should be calling for any kind of genocide. Maybe the guy is trolling, but that is no way to make a point.', ">>{TardisBlu} : I made a post asking about this problem and got ridiculed by a few people. After one of the last few updates my 6 only lasts about 3 hours. I just went on vacation and it would only last about an hour if I used my GPS for an average of 20 min. I don't want to swap my battery out because a few people have told me that may not be the fix.", ">>{De_Vermis_Mysteriis} : That's elapsed time correct, not remaining? If so that's pretty good. Sorry im switching from android to iOS and haven't looked at iOS battery status screens since iOS8...", ">>{ragdelwolf} : yeah that's elapsed time. iOS does not show remaining time. (as far as i know)", '>>{Kalel2319} : You and I are obviously on different ends of the political spectrum. But I\'ll say this in the hopes of finding a common ground: I fucking hate this left wing click bait. Of course the argument goes "he was just trying to be provocative, etc, etc." or even "he doesn\'t mean what you think" but I can\'t fucking stand it because it continues to divide us. It gives your side an enemy-- maybe even some evidence and it gives people on the far left something to get academic about. So, while you and I both know that there will be no white genocide, and we both have obviously been triggered by our respective bullshit, just understand that these things aren\'t black and white, that we\'re all Americans on a political sub trying desperately to find meaning in a world that rapidly advanced beyond human limitations and sometimes on both sides of the aisle the wrong guy tries to make a buck and it unites two people on one issue, namely; fuck this guy. He should lose his job. Full stop.', '>>{triforcelinkz} : this morning I turned on my phone and it was at 99%. I unlocked it and in a matter of a minute, I watched, literally watched, The percentage drop from 99% to 90% on my 6S', ">>{NotFooledbyFools} : I'm white. I'm a lefty. I'm not a special snowflake that needs a safe space from some meany's words.", '>>{takeashill_pill} : White genocide is what neo-nazis call interracial dating.', '>>{FlyHoenn} : How much music did you hear? I think iOS counts music playing time as usage time, even if the screen is off', ">>{Wellbe} : You don't need to be a left or right snowflake or require a safe place to recognize and call out stupid comments like those tweeted.", ">>{BurnTheFascists} : Okay, calling for the massacre of any race isn't cool. I mean, calling for the massacre of white supremacists I could understand, but some white folks are trying to be decent neighbors here.", '>>{KaonPlus} : AFAIK iOS "usage" is unreliable as a measure of actual usage. When the phone is working, it\'ll report that it\'s being used - even if the screen is on.', '>>{Sand_Scar} : What a dumb thing to say. And how hypocritical of right wing PC', ">>{quovadisguy} : Because the far left subs on this site only want to people to discuss it on their own subs, where they can shape the discussion. There's one thread out there that literally has half their comments removed.", '>>{reneofficial} : I use all of these the most and get to 20% with 6 hour usage.', ">>{reneofficial} : iPhone 7 Plus and I get at least 5-6 hours with 20% left. I'm thinking I need to clean restore.", ">>{whiskeyfries} : It's purpose was to provoke and get a lot of attention. There have been multiple articles posted here today about it, so it worked. People are pissed off.", ">>{swarexs985} : Not gonna lie, all these posts are just making me even happier to have gotten a battery case. I'm still at 100% at hour 13.", ">>{Goldmessiah} : Probably because a lunatic leftie doesn't represent the majority of the left and we're left wondering why this is national news when this person isn't prominent in politics at all?", '>>{whiskeyfries} : Maybe you should attend one of his classes so you could understand the joke', ">>{accountforrunning} : Yea, best thing to do is just take your phone off the charger and don't plug it in for 24 hours. Then check the screen on time which i am not sure why people don't include in these screenshots.", '>>{WillieBetter} : Reuters is fake now. Damn, The Onion is taking over the world.', '>>{whiskeyfries} : We already are enemies. The left just will not accept it as truth.', ">>{CMDR_APACHE4} : Oh my bad, didn't realize white genocide doesn't actually mean white genocide.", ">>{tekonus} : My SE doesn't see what the big deal is...", '>>{whiskeyfries} : They are stupid and provocative on purpose can people really not understand that? I could explain it to a tenth grader in 5 minutes', '>>{Blood_Fox} : Get rid of the facebook app and use Safari for that instead. Facebook is a battery drainer.', '>>{whiskeyfries} : I could explain his point to an average high school student in 5 minutes, but you cannot get his point? Come on', '>>{mysticportal} : Are you on the latest update? And can I see what apps you have installed + battery usage page?', '>>{whiskeyfries} : Then you do not understand the constitution and want to join the morality police.', ">>{yankeesyes} : Because a professor of a second-tier school that no one has ever heard of talking about terrible acts is exactly the same as when members of the President-Elect's staff talk about it. Because both sides are equally bad.", ">>{kalamityjames} : You don't have to be a right winger to think this guy is ridiculous. Moreover, people like him are always complaining about jokes with any racial connotation. But apparently it's okay when he does it.", ">>{NotFooledbyFools} : Nah, here's me not giving a fuck about some unknown professor and whatever it is he tweets.", ">>{reneofficial} : 9 hrs and only 70%?! How... What's at the top of your list? I'm curious if you're using Facebook or Snapchat and STILL getting incredible battery.", ">>{Blood_Fox} : App Store (2 min on screen) Safari (32 min on screen) Mail (3 min on screen, 4 min background) YouTube (8 min on screen) Narwhal (26 min on screen) Messages (33 min on screen) Messenger (26 min on screen, 28 min background) Instagram (7 min on screen) (This is all past 24 hours, so it won't count anything beyond that.) I'm at 10 hr usage and 49 hour standby with 66% now", ">>{Trumpede1984} : Why has it become acceptable to hate on white people in the USA? I'm half black and half white and my black family are so rude to my white mum + white cousins, calling them snobs and shit even though they're wealthier. My white family are just normal and haven't said anything racially charged. So glad I got the fuck out of there and am in Australia now.", '>>{Manafort} : >Then you do not understand the constitution Care to elaborate on this? Is it unconstitutional to for someone for making controversial statements?', '>>{Rabbyte808} : You do not understand the constitution. You have a right to have an opinion and express that opinion, you do not have the right to face no consequences because of that opinion. On top of this, Drexel University is a private organization so he has no protection. His job as a professor is to be fair to all of his students. If there is any reason he unfairly discriminates against some students, he should be immediately fired.', '>>{whiskeyfries} : Err maybe I mistook your comment as misunderstanding then. It seems like the white supremacists are out in full force on this topic trying to make it into something it is not.', '>>{likejackandsally} : I had this exact issue with my 6 as well. After upgrading to iOS 10 I started having a lot of battery issues with my phone shutting down at random battery percentages and then shooting up to 80-90% when I plugged it in, only to "die" an hour or so later. I called Apple and they ran a diagnostic test. They said the battery needed to be replaced. I went on vacation about 2 weeks later and a charge was barely lasting 3 hours. I had the battery replaced while on vacation (got lucky and the battery place that did it for me had everything iphone on clearance because of Apple\'s cease and desist on unauthorized repairs). It fixed the problem immediately. I upgraded to the 7 a few months ago and haven\'t had any issues. Yet.', '>>{Rabbyte808} : If he is unfairly hard on white students, or any other group of students, he should be fired immediately. Same with any other professor who discriminates against any other group of students. Universities are a place for education, not a place to be an edgelord.', '>>{Silv0r} : I hope my battery on my iPhone 7 Plus will be better with 10.3... really disappointed until now with battery life :(', ">>{Manafort} : >Probably because a lunatic leftie doesn't represent the majority of the left and we're left wondering why this is national news when this person isn't prominent in politics at all? I agree with this, and also think ghost liberal media outlets should stop giving a platform to people like Richard Spencer who represents an absolutely miniscule number of people.", '>>{whiskeyfries} : Uh because they cheated, lied, colluded with Russia to gain power? Because they will grab power at any cost so they can make money?', '>>{Intuition17} : These posts are useless without at least posting a picture of the entire battery stats so we can see what your usage is like.', ">>{Manafort} : >I could explain his point to an average high school student in 5 minutes, but you cannot get his point? Come on You keep repeating this. Why not just post the explanation, if it's so simple?", '>>{GTR0708} : So? I can think of a lot of shit that might have an obscure explanation that I probably shouldn\'t put on my Twitter as a college professor. "I love fingering young pussy so much!" "Oh lol you guys I meant finding and choosing young cats to make part of my family!"', ">>{whiskeyfries} : I have, it's in my post history. I can copy paste it if you want. The person I explained it to seemed to understand, which is cool.", '>>{whiskeyfries} : Your comment is insane and anyone who has been to college with a basic understanding of critical thinking will laugh at it.', '>>{rent1985} : I am at 10% remaining and I have only 5 hours and 8 min of usage and 6 hours and 32 minutes of standby. iPhone 6 with 2 week old new battery.', ">>{whiskeyfries} : He wasn't spouting hate speech. He was literally trying to make fun of and trigger white supremacists, and it worked. You got trolled", '>>{tekonus} : You just listed about 3 hours worth of usage... do you just stare at your home screen for hours on end?', '>>{Blood_Fox} : 3 hours in the last 24 hours. The other 7 hours was in the 22 hours before that. I mostly reddit/YouTube/web browse/pokemon go/text/call...', ">>{theginger3469} : My 6 barely lasts the a few hours before I need to plug it in... trying to hold out till the 7s/8....but I'm not sure its gonna make it.", '>>{astalavista114} : I have extra batteries for that job. \\me knocks on wood with crosses fingers', '>>{Fender6969} : My situation as well. Wish it would get better.', '>>{AlexTraner} : Have support runs. Diagnostic and make sure your battery is still good', ">>{AnAnonymousSource_} : He definitely shouldn't have just let that one hang out there. A little context would have been very useful. White supremacists call interracial dating white genocide and they have been targeting him and his professor for being liberals. This was a passive aggressive statement wishing the 14 words movement to go away forever.", ">>{takeashill_pill} : It's not the same, this term was invented to be a scary name for modern mores and demographic changes.", ">>{Kulimeya} : Yes, my old one was affected. So I got the new one and had 10 hrs of battery life, which didn't lasted long.", '>>{Rabbyte808} : Your comment is toxic, and anybody who took classes for a degree that actually matters will understand why bigoted and unfair professors have no place in higher education.', ">>{milenkoIncarnate} : I have the lifeproof fre power case for the 6. I typically go 2 or 3 days without ever seeing a charger. I use my phone constantly as well. I can't even imagine what 10.3 will do for me. I'm holding out for a jailbreak though.", ">>{whiskeyfries} : Ok I went back and re read your previous comment. You said if he is being unfairly hard on one group of students based on their race he should be in trouble. You are correct. The information you are missing is that he wasn't doing that. He was trolling white supremacists and it worked, because now they are all pissed off. Please don't be trolled like the neo nazis. Be smarter and get it.", ">>{GTR0708} : Genocide still means something to people who don't hang out in neo nazi clubs or people obsessed with them. And it's not good.", '>>{takeashill_pill} : Is anyone besides white supremacists really afraid minorities are going to rise up and put white people in concentration camps?', ">>{bckstbbR} : You guys wanna get a good battery life? Uninstall that facebook app and u'll be fine. Use it on browser.", ">>{allas250} : You're commenting all over this thread Doesn't really show apathy on the subject", ">>{GTR0708} : I don't think you have to be afraid of a comment to think it's racist. Do you?", '>>{m1dday} : Whoa, what kind of usage have those two hours been on?', ">>{MrRedditAccount} : iPhone 7 here and it's improved immensely. It was so bad before I was thinking was selling it.", ">>{somedirection} : I no longer see a %age breakdown by app in the battery menu like you do I'm on a 6 as well. I believe it went away after I updated BEFORE 10.3 was that 10.2.10? Anyone else experience this? I sure miss it", ">>{PeanutButterChicken} : My 7 Plus is violently losing battery life on iOS 10.3. I'm starting to think I have a lemon.", '>>{GTR0708} : I\'m in the same boat you are, but to the very far left, everyone is a "right winger" and I\'m afraid /r/politics is trending in that direction.', ">>{D_S876} : I've noticed my battery life double on my 5s since I updated. From about 7 hours to 14 hours. (Spotify, Netflix YouTube and reddit can be bitches for your battery)", '>>{PavelDatsyuk} : Yeah the bottom number is how long the phone has been off the charger after a full charge and the top number is "usage time" which is kind of like screen on time on Android, but not really.', ">>{Brian-OBlivion} : I've contracted HIV and syphilis from my flag-burning spirit cooking transsexual orgies. I'm on my way out but I think I'll be able to at least get a vote in for Clinton in the 2020 primary.", ">>{PavelDatsyuk} : > won't let apple update my phone to obsolescence. The SE is like a year and some change old. It's got the power of the 6S. It's not going to be obsolete any time soon, so update away if you want.", ">>{PavelDatsyuk} : Apparently not if they're getting 9 hours usage and 15 standby.", '>>{Pratyush412} : I am able to Get only 5hr usage ,by any chance did you charged your phone in between cause it gets added in battery usage [iPhone 6 iOS 10.3 Battery ](https://goo.gl/photos/5AFcxBHheNMcAYfG9)', '>>{Jwsaf} : Oh damn apparently mine is elegible, I had no idea what was going on with the phone lol.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{CyberIndustrialist} : Europeans are such an interesting group of people. They rape, pillage and destroy nearly the entire planet, but when the repercussions of some immoral conquistador activity fall back on them, they throw a hissy fit.', '>>{MBAMBA0} : Bannon is an idiot and hypocrite, he professes to be a devout Catholic but also has cited Thomas Cromwell as a role model. The point being, Cromwell was one of those in the reign of Henry VIII who worked hard to DISMANTLE the catholic church in England and had Sir Thomas Moore (canonized as a SAINT) executed for refusing to denounce his Catholicism.', ">>{Lakridspibe} : I was expecting something from Michel Houellebecq. I've read some of his books.", '>>{PM_ME_YOUR_YONI} : I would have expected [*The Turner Diaries*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Turner_Diaries) It\'s every "they comin\' to git yer gunz so you can\'t fight back in the coming RACE WAR!!!111" paranoid fantasy of the extremist American Right. Timothy McVeigh had pages torn out and highlighted from this favorite novel of White Supremacists. He carried them in his pocket to use as instructions for his Oklahoma City bombing. RADICAL. DOMESTIC. TERRORISM. Why can\'t Trump and Bannon say those three simple words? How can we fight the RADICAL. DOMESTIC. TERRORISTS. if Trump/Bannon/Putin won\'t even acknowledge they exist?', '>>{takeashill_pill} : This has been called the immigration analogue to The Turner Diaries.', ">>{Reneeisme} : How does each new post in this forum manage to make me more nauseous than the last? This is the man whispering trump's ear? This is the man Trump thought fit to serve as an adviser?", '>>{takeashill_pill} : From Wikipedia: >Near the end of the story the mayor of New York City is made to share Gracie Mansion with three families from Harlem, the Queen of the United Kingdom must agree to have her son marry a Pakistani woman, and only one drunken Soviet soldier stands in the way of thousands of Chinese people as they swarm into Siberia. The one holdout until the end of the novel is Switzerland, but by then international pressure isolating it as a rogue state for not opening its borders forces it to capitulate. It should be noted that conservatives at the time, including William F. Buckley, loved it.', '>>{Relevant_Tweets} : **Relevant_Tweets Alert** Tweet from [Don Cheadle](https://twitter.com/DonCheadle/status/838163171055566848): >Hated him [Trump] since he asked my friend\'s father at a Doral pro-am if he\'d ever "f*cked a nigger..." Did it for me ... in response to [Brand Hoffa](https://twitter.com/BrandHoffa/status/838162147108610049): >@DonCheadle I\'ve been following you since you made me laugh with that political boat posing reply. You were Trump hating way before treason.', '>>{crusoe} : Please tell me again how this presidency is not racist when Trump surrounds himself with racists.', '>>{anon902503} : It fills me with genuine dread that this guy is now in a position to cause our country to commit an atrocity that will shame us and our descendants for generations.', '>>{Temp89} : Bannon has also written how France is doomed due to "cross-breeding". You have a pro-genocide, pro-eugenics racist as the second most powerful man in the US.'], [">>{supersheesh} : Pennsylvania professor under fire for 'white genocide' tweet", '>>{Kenny_Wayne_Shitbird} : Damn, this is getting downvoted bigly. Why does this sub hate white people?', '>>{Healthy_Economist_86} : His tweets seem to indicate a lack of objectivity in regards to his white students. I would move to fire him immediately.', ">>{vuport} : I like how now he says it was a joke. I'm sure he and his social justice friends would be so forgiving of someone saying that about another race, as long as they said they were kidding.", ">>{Brian-OBlivion} : I would shoot myself but I don't believe in the right to bear arms....", '>>{NotFooledbyFools} : Look at all the right wing snowflakes wanting a safe space.', '>>{Wellbe} : So the left, many of which are white, is not concerned with someone advocating genocide? Please tell me the left does not agree with this?', '>>{truthhurts4444} : Poor execution. It would have been much funnier if he tried to include it as a Christmas pun, something along the lines of "I\'m Dreaming of a White Genocide"', '>>{so--what} : Leftist here. No one should be calling for any kind of genocide. Maybe the guy is trolling, but that is no way to make a point.', '>>{Kalel2319} : You and I are obviously on different ends of the political spectrum. But I\'ll say this in the hopes of finding a common ground: I fucking hate this left wing click bait. Of course the argument goes "he was just trying to be provocative, etc, etc." or even "he doesn\'t mean what you think" but I can\'t fucking stand it because it continues to divide us. It gives your side an enemy-- maybe even some evidence and it gives people on the far left something to get academic about. So, while you and I both know that there will be no white genocide, and we both have obviously been triggered by our respective bullshit, just understand that these things aren\'t black and white, that we\'re all Americans on a political sub trying desperately to find meaning in a world that rapidly advanced beyond human limitations and sometimes on both sides of the aisle the wrong guy tries to make a buck and it unites two people on one issue, namely; fuck this guy. He should lose his job. Full stop.', ">>{NotFooledbyFools} : I'm white. I'm a lefty. I'm not a special snowflake that needs a safe space from some meany's words.", '>>{takeashill_pill} : White genocide is what neo-nazis call interracial dating.', ">>{Wellbe} : You don't need to be a left or right snowflake or require a safe place to recognize and call out stupid comments like those tweeted.", ">>{BurnTheFascists} : Okay, calling for the massacre of any race isn't cool. I mean, calling for the massacre of white supremacists I could understand, but some white folks are trying to be decent neighbors here.", '>>{Sand_Scar} : What a dumb thing to say. And how hypocritical of right wing PC', ">>{quovadisguy} : Because the far left subs on this site only want to people to discuss it on their own subs, where they can shape the discussion. There's one thread out there that literally has half their comments removed.", ">>{whiskeyfries} : It's purpose was to provoke and get a lot of attention. There have been multiple articles posted here today about it, so it worked. People are pissed off.", ">>{Goldmessiah} : Probably because a lunatic leftie doesn't represent the majority of the left and we're left wondering why this is national news when this person isn't prominent in politics at all?", '>>{whiskeyfries} : Maybe you should attend one of his classes so you could understand the joke', '>>{WillieBetter} : Reuters is fake now. Damn, The Onion is taking over the world.', '>>{whiskeyfries} : We already are enemies. The left just will not accept it as truth.', ">>{CMDR_APACHE4} : Oh my bad, didn't realize white genocide doesn't actually mean white genocide.", '>>{whiskeyfries} : They are stupid and provocative on purpose can people really not understand that? I could explain it to a tenth grader in 5 minutes', '>>{whiskeyfries} : I could explain his point to an average high school student in 5 minutes, but you cannot get his point? Come on', '>>{whiskeyfries} : Then you do not understand the constitution and want to join the morality police.', ">>{yankeesyes} : Because a professor of a second-tier school that no one has ever heard of talking about terrible acts is exactly the same as when members of the President-Elect's staff talk about it. Because both sides are equally bad.", ">>{kalamityjames} : You don't have to be a right winger to think this guy is ridiculous. Moreover, people like him are always complaining about jokes with any racial connotation. But apparently it's okay when he does it.", ">>{NotFooledbyFools} : Nah, here's me not giving a fuck about some unknown professor and whatever it is he tweets.", ">>{Trumpede1984} : Why has it become acceptable to hate on white people in the USA? I'm half black and half white and my black family are so rude to my white mum + white cousins, calling them snobs and shit even though they're wealthier. My white family are just normal and haven't said anything racially charged. So glad I got the fuck out of there and am in Australia now.", '>>{Manafort} : >Then you do not understand the constitution Care to elaborate on this? Is it unconstitutional to for someone for making controversial statements?', '>>{Rabbyte808} : You do not understand the constitution. You have a right to have an opinion and express that opinion, you do not have the right to face no consequences because of that opinion. On top of this, Drexel University is a private organization so he has no protection. His job as a professor is to be fair to all of his students. If there is any reason he unfairly discriminates against some students, he should be immediately fired.', '>>{whiskeyfries} : Err maybe I mistook your comment as misunderstanding then. It seems like the white supremacists are out in full force on this topic trying to make it into something it is not.', '>>{Rabbyte808} : If he is unfairly hard on white students, or any other group of students, he should be fired immediately. Same with any other professor who discriminates against any other group of students. Universities are a place for education, not a place to be an edgelord.', ">>{Manafort} : >Probably because a lunatic leftie doesn't represent the majority of the left and we're left wondering why this is national news when this person isn't prominent in politics at all? I agree with this, and also think ghost liberal media outlets should stop giving a platform to people like Richard Spencer who represents an absolutely miniscule number of people.", '>>{whiskeyfries} : Uh because they cheated, lied, colluded with Russia to gain power? Because they will grab power at any cost so they can make money?', ">>{Manafort} : >I could explain his point to an average high school student in 5 minutes, but you cannot get his point? Come on You keep repeating this. Why not just post the explanation, if it's so simple?", '>>{GTR0708} : So? I can think of a lot of shit that might have an obscure explanation that I probably shouldn\'t put on my Twitter as a college professor. "I love fingering young pussy so much!" "Oh lol you guys I meant finding and choosing young cats to make part of my family!"', ">>{whiskeyfries} : I have, it's in my post history. I can copy paste it if you want. The person I explained it to seemed to understand, which is cool.", '>>{whiskeyfries} : Your comment is insane and anyone who has been to college with a basic understanding of critical thinking will laugh at it.', ">>{whiskeyfries} : He wasn't spouting hate speech. He was literally trying to make fun of and trigger white supremacists, and it worked. You got trolled", ">>{AnAnonymousSource_} : He definitely shouldn't have just let that one hang out there. A little context would have been very useful. White supremacists call interracial dating white genocide and they have been targeting him and his professor for being liberals. This was a passive aggressive statement wishing the 14 words movement to go away forever.", ">>{takeashill_pill} : It's not the same, this term was invented to be a scary name for modern mores and demographic changes.", '>>{Rabbyte808} : Your comment is toxic, and anybody who took classes for a degree that actually matters will understand why bigoted and unfair professors have no place in higher education.', ">>{whiskeyfries} : Ok I went back and re read your previous comment. You said if he is being unfairly hard on one group of students based on their race he should be in trouble. You are correct. The information you are missing is that he wasn't doing that. He was trolling white supremacists and it worked, because now they are all pissed off. Please don't be trolled like the neo nazis. Be smarter and get it.", ">>{GTR0708} : Genocide still means something to people who don't hang out in neo nazi clubs or people obsessed with them. And it's not good.", '>>{takeashill_pill} : Is anyone besides white supremacists really afraid minorities are going to rise up and put white people in concentration camps?', ">>{allas250} : You're commenting all over this thread Doesn't really show apathy on the subject", ">>{GTR0708} : I don't think you have to be afraid of a comment to think it's racist. Do you?", '>>{GTR0708} : I\'m in the same boat you are, but to the very far left, everyone is a "right winger" and I\'m afraid /r/politics is trending in that direction.', ">>{Brian-OBlivion} : I've contracted HIV and syphilis from my flag-burning spirit cooking transsexual orgies. I'm on my way out but I think I'll be able to at least get a vote in for Clinton in the 2020 primary."], ['>>{Topher1999} : iOS 10.3 has great battery life (iPhone 6, new battery)', '>>{RetroGradeReturn} : I think I noticed the same with the apple watch, mine seems to last longer on the new software. Perhaps a side-effect of the new file system?', ">>{Svviftie} : 9+ hours on a normal 6? Sounds amazing, can't wait to get this on my 6 Plus. The battery life is already insane on that phone, so this is pretty exciting.", '>>{bobtheboffin} : I get 5-6 hours usage on one charge, what kind of apps do you use?', '>>{wanson} : That looks impossible. My 6 barely makes it 3 hours.', '>>{marrio83} : iPhone 7 plus and my battery is a lot worse after the update', '>>{kamikazeschaf} : SE here and my battery life got dramatically worse.', ">>{ballhardergetmoney} : Thanks for the report. I'm loving my SE on 10.2 and I'm getting all day battery. I won't let apple update my phone to obsolescence.", '>>{itsmegeorge} : Same!!!! Thought I was the only one!!! I would honestly get 2 days off it and now I get a day at best!', ">>{devopia} : Bro. My 6s is making 3 1/2 on an average day and 4 if I'm lucky. Way too scared to even upgrade.", ">>{Kulimeya} : I don't know what I'm doing wrong. 10.3 on 6S Plus and I get about 5hrs of usage. When I got it new some weeks ago I reached 10hrs, but after some weeks it got much worse.", ">>{byjimini} : Haven't charged mine since Wednesday night; 40% left as it stands.", '>>{wanson} : Not a whole lot. Interestingly, I just checked it now and for the first time I am getting a message saying that my battery may need to be serviced. I knew that already but the geniuses at the apple store checked it a few weeks ago and said it was good. ¯\\_(ツ)_/¯', ">>{FlatiK} : I got a new battery as well but I'm losing a lot of battery even on standby, everything is turned off and I'm always in low power mode. I'm jealous!", ">>{FlatiK} : Mine was having the same problem, I changed the battery to a new one and it's not getting better.", ">>{davetheninja81} : Initially mine was worse on my 6S, Now I don't notice any difference.", ">>{TardisBlu} : I made a post asking about this problem and got ridiculed by a few people. After one of the last few updates my 6 only lasts about 3 hours. I just went on vacation and it would only last about an hour if I used my GPS for an average of 20 min. I don't want to swap my battery out because a few people have told me that may not be the fix.", ">>{De_Vermis_Mysteriis} : That's elapsed time correct, not remaining? If so that's pretty good. Sorry im switching from android to iOS and haven't looked at iOS battery status screens since iOS8...", ">>{ragdelwolf} : yeah that's elapsed time. iOS does not show remaining time. (as far as i know)", '>>{triforcelinkz} : this morning I turned on my phone and it was at 99%. I unlocked it and in a matter of a minute, I watched, literally watched, The percentage drop from 99% to 90% on my 6S', '>>{FlyHoenn} : How much music did you hear? I think iOS counts music playing time as usage time, even if the screen is off', '>>{KaonPlus} : AFAIK iOS "usage" is unreliable as a measure of actual usage. When the phone is working, it\'ll report that it\'s being used - even if the screen is on.', '>>{reneofficial} : I use all of these the most and get to 20% with 6 hour usage.', ">>{reneofficial} : iPhone 7 Plus and I get at least 5-6 hours with 20% left. I'm thinking I need to clean restore.", ">>{swarexs985} : Not gonna lie, all these posts are just making me even happier to have gotten a battery case. I'm still at 100% at hour 13.", ">>{accountforrunning} : Yea, best thing to do is just take your phone off the charger and don't plug it in for 24 hours. Then check the screen on time which i am not sure why people don't include in these screenshots.", ">>{tekonus} : My SE doesn't see what the big deal is...", '>>{Blood_Fox} : Get rid of the facebook app and use Safari for that instead. Facebook is a battery drainer.', '>>{mysticportal} : Are you on the latest update? And can I see what apps you have installed + battery usage page?', ">>{reneofficial} : 9 hrs and only 70%?! How... What's at the top of your list? I'm curious if you're using Facebook or Snapchat and STILL getting incredible battery.", ">>{Blood_Fox} : App Store (2 min on screen) Safari (32 min on screen) Mail (3 min on screen, 4 min background) YouTube (8 min on screen) Narwhal (26 min on screen) Messages (33 min on screen) Messenger (26 min on screen, 28 min background) Instagram (7 min on screen) (This is all past 24 hours, so it won't count anything beyond that.) I'm at 10 hr usage and 49 hour standby with 66% now", '>>{likejackandsally} : I had this exact issue with my 6 as well. After upgrading to iOS 10 I started having a lot of battery issues with my phone shutting down at random battery percentages and then shooting up to 80-90% when I plugged it in, only to "die" an hour or so later. I called Apple and they ran a diagnostic test. They said the battery needed to be replaced. I went on vacation about 2 weeks later and a charge was barely lasting 3 hours. I had the battery replaced while on vacation (got lucky and the battery place that did it for me had everything iphone on clearance because of Apple\'s cease and desist on unauthorized repairs). It fixed the problem immediately. I upgraded to the 7 a few months ago and haven\'t had any issues. Yet.', '>>{Silv0r} : I hope my battery on my iPhone 7 Plus will be better with 10.3... really disappointed until now with battery life :(', '>>{Intuition17} : These posts are useless without at least posting a picture of the entire battery stats so we can see what your usage is like.', '>>{rent1985} : I am at 10% remaining and I have only 5 hours and 8 min of usage and 6 hours and 32 minutes of standby. iPhone 6 with 2 week old new battery.', '>>{tekonus} : You just listed about 3 hours worth of usage... do you just stare at your home screen for hours on end?', '>>{Blood_Fox} : 3 hours in the last 24 hours. The other 7 hours was in the 22 hours before that. I mostly reddit/YouTube/web browse/pokemon go/text/call...', ">>{theginger3469} : My 6 barely lasts the a few hours before I need to plug it in... trying to hold out till the 7s/8....but I'm not sure its gonna make it.", '>>{astalavista114} : I have extra batteries for that job. \\me knocks on wood with crosses fingers', '>>{Fender6969} : My situation as well. Wish it would get better.', '>>{AlexTraner} : Have support runs. Diagnostic and make sure your battery is still good', ">>{Kulimeya} : Yes, my old one was affected. So I got the new one and had 10 hrs of battery life, which didn't lasted long.", ">>{milenkoIncarnate} : I have the lifeproof fre power case for the 6. I typically go 2 or 3 days without ever seeing a charger. I use my phone constantly as well. I can't even imagine what 10.3 will do for me. I'm holding out for a jailbreak though.", ">>{bckstbbR} : You guys wanna get a good battery life? Uninstall that facebook app and u'll be fine. Use it on browser.", '>>{m1dday} : Whoa, what kind of usage have those two hours been on?', ">>{MrRedditAccount} : iPhone 7 here and it's improved immensely. It was so bad before I was thinking was selling it.", ">>{somedirection} : I no longer see a %age breakdown by app in the battery menu like you do I'm on a 6 as well. I believe it went away after I updated BEFORE 10.3 was that 10.2.10? Anyone else experience this? I sure miss it", ">>{PeanutButterChicken} : My 7 Plus is violently losing battery life on iOS 10.3. I'm starting to think I have a lemon.", ">>{D_S876} : I've noticed my battery life double on my 5s since I updated. From about 7 hours to 14 hours. (Spotify, Netflix YouTube and reddit can be bitches for your battery)", '>>{PavelDatsyuk} : Yeah the bottom number is how long the phone has been off the charger after a full charge and the top number is "usage time" which is kind of like screen on time on Android, but not really.', ">>{PavelDatsyuk} : > won't let apple update my phone to obsolescence. The SE is like a year and some change old. It's got the power of the 6S. It's not going to be obsolete any time soon, so update away if you want.", ">>{PavelDatsyuk} : Apparently not if they're getting 9 hours usage and 15 standby.", '>>{Pratyush412} : I am able to Get only 5hr usage ,by any chance did you charged your phone in between cause it gets added in battery usage [iPhone 6 iOS 10.3 Battery ](https://goo.gl/photos/5AFcxBHheNMcAYfG9)', '>>{Jwsaf} : Oh damn apparently mine is elegible, I had no idea what was going on with the phone lol.']]

classify and reply

[">>{justicefishy} : Coulter: Trump is victim of 'media rape'", '>>{gindc} : 10 Ways the CIA’s ‘Russian Hacking’ Story is Left-Wing ‘Fake News’', '>>{awesomeness0232} : Probably because it\'s partisan, propagandist garbage. I honestly don\'t understand how anyone can justify criticizing HuffPo and then defending Breitbart other than "I only like it when news sites reaffirm my opinions".', '>>{Honoluuluu} : ITT Liberals who are fine with the unadulterated shit that is Huffington Post, but spas out when Breitbart is linked', '>>{Stellaaahhhh} : If there were some way to force Coulter and Trump into a two person human centipede, I would be super in favor of that.', '>>{justicefishy} : Yep. Apparently taking words in context and repeating them verbatim is media rape now.', ">>{Dan_The_Manimal} : Strong candidates don't allow that to happen. Strong candidates find a new country.", ">>{DebussySIMiami} : 1) We don't like it. 2)-10) See #1.", '>>{gindc} : I think it\'s pretty telling that Republicans are calling for a congressional hearing into the matter. Let\'s bring all the facts to light. There does seem to be disagreement between the CIA and FBI. So lets hear that debate. "Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) pledged to support a congressional investigation into whether Russian hacking affected the 2016 election. Republicans have nothing to fear from such an investigation, because they won the election fair and square." Why aren\'t Democrats calling for a congressional hearing? Are they too embarrassed by what happened at the DNC? Is there more information they are trying to hide?', ">>{AndrewRyansRapture} : You realize there's a gulf of difference between biased liberal paper and state supported mouthpiece outlet, right?", ">>{stormeaglex1} : It's hilarious how it's even a thought in the heads of some people that Donald fucking Trump is a victim in all of this", ">>{h3rring} : I'm upvoting this just because it proves how delusional the alt-right is.", ">>{gindc} : LOL. Yeah, got called a Nazi the last time I posted a Breitbart article. It was just a biography piece on the new DHS secretary. It wasn't the least bit controversial or incorrect.", '>>{Triggered_Trump} : Professional Psychotic Ex-Girlfriend Ann Coulter says: PAY ATTENTION TO ME!!!!!!!!!!!', '>>{wraithtek} : Donald Trump is the victim of truth, facts, and direct quotes.', '>>{ashstronge} : Ann Coulter just says the most controversial and provocative right wing thing she can think of. It is all to get media attention and publicity in order to stay relevant. Best just to leave her to it and just nod your head when she comes over.', '>>{Rupperrt} : didn\'t know CIA was a news agency. The whole thing is almost hilarious. Putin must be laughing his ass off. The president elect says, his own intelligence agency is spreading conspiracies and boycotts their briefings because "he is so smart", while FBI lost all reputation with Comey and the main defense industry cooperation looses billions in worth. US has become a banana republic within weeks. China and Russia are the new overlords I guess.', ">>{Dan_The_Manimal} : If it's a legitimate media rape, the campaign has ways to try to shut that whole thing down", '>>{Morchaint} : Democrats are calling for a congressional hearing. Schumer and McCain are calling for a bipartisan special committee. McConnell is calling for it to be investigated in a closed door committee, he is on and Republicans control.', '>>{SultanObama} : Hold on, did the campaign clearly state "Please don\'t rape me"? If not, this is clearly not a rape but consensual buttfuckery', ">>{TurdFurgoson} : >Why aren't Democrats calling for a congressional hearing? Are they too embarrassed by what happened at the DNC? Is there more information they are trying to hide? WTF? Chuck Schumer was one of the first people calling for this. Or did Breitbart not report that?", '>>{nonades} : So, when did Arianna Huffington get hired by the Clinton Campaign during the election?', ">>{SultanObama} : Look, even if the RNC was raped by the media, the disaster baby formed is God's will and cannot be aborted. I'm sorry republicans, but you're stuck with Trump.", ">>{malpais} : You're busted Brietbart. You can't get your boy out of this one comrade.", '>>{CMDR-Ad-Victoriam} : McConnell wants to use the republican controlled SIC to dictate the outcome instead of a special committee like what McCain wanted. You are a disingenuous liar sir. This is about controlling the outcome, not getting to the truth of the matter. Edit - >ruling out a special committee and instead saying the Senate Intelligence Committee could proceed with the probe.', '>>{ABTechie} : Stop listening to this woman. Stop giving her media time. Her job is to same offensive things to generate media time. Stop giving her media time.', '>>{MFG1628} : It\'s funny how the same people who have no problem when the media makes up stories that fit their agenda all of a sudden call for media bias when the "liberal media" attacks their candidate. It\'s like they completely ignore how Fox News has attacked Obama for the past 8 years, regardless of facts. On top of it all the media is literally just stating things directly from Trumps mouth. They\'re getting mad at the wrong person, and look like fools doing it.', ">>{JukeboxVoice} : Ann Coulter is hilarious. Very offensive, duh... but it's all intentionally crafted. I register her speech the same way I register the speech in comedy movies. Sometimes she's actually really funny, and you can tell there's actually a person under there. She will say something so outrageously wrong and bigoted and then laugh. It's like a weird mixture of psychosis and self-awareness. She knows it's absurd... but this is the career she has made... so now she has to keep behaving in this way... She boarded a train going in the wrong direction and now can't disembark.", ">>{mattsoca} : She's the replacement for the Weekly World News. Expecting a Hillary=BatBoy tweet from her sometime soon.", '>>{foolmanchoo} : Here come the Trumplethinskins to use their victim card for poor wittle Trumpy.', ">>{metaobject} : Apparently, they're supposed to either find a new career or a new job", '>>{metaobject} : One time I heard her call in to another radio show (maybe Hannity, who knows?) and she legit sounded drunk. She was slurring her speech and everything. Does anyone know if there have been reports of her having a drinking problem?', '>>{Dr_Straw-man} : If it was a legitimate media rape, the body has a way to shut it down.', ">>{gindc} : Um. No I don't think so. People should have access to both sides of the debate. I don't support censorship.", '>>{awesomeness0232} : The thing is, Breitbart is so overtly invested in Trump that there\'s really no hope of getting "truth" from anything they write. I understand that it\'s hard to sort through media bias, but getting news from Breitbart is as good as forming your opinions on Trump based on what Trump thinks you should think of him.', ">>{mwsomerset} : I don't know about the drinking but Adam Corolla sure was having none of it... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4hacmvSPaI", '>>{mikes94} : Fake news. Down vote it and move on. Its all we can do.', '>>{InFearn0} : [She has to get all rape term usage out of her system before she has to switch to writing cook books and romance novels.](http://wonkette.com/605053/ann-coulter-threatens-to-give-up-and-write-cookbooks-and-mysteries-if-trump-loses-oh-no)', ">>{RealName_Arty_Morty} : > one is telling me the sky is blue Fact > and the other it's green Breitbart news", '>>{MolestedConservative} : Breitbart has publicly attacked people who mentioned Russia and the cold war. Apparently "liberals are attempting to rewrite history by claiming Russia, *not Cuba,* was focus of the cold war.', '>>{ivsciguy} : I really wanted them to cast her as Umbridge in Harry Potter.', '>>{DragonPup} : > People should have access to both sides of the debate. That is textbook false equivalence.', '>>{Chinesedoghandler} : Brietbart and conservatives are so fond of making lists. Why have one good point when you can have 9 lies and one half-truth packaged together?', '>>{TuLegit2quit} : She will say what ever it takes to sell books. She does not care who wins. She just needs to have a platform to make inflammatory statements.', ">>{malpais} : It's simpler to just vote it down into the dirt where it belongs.", ">>{Monalisa9298} : She's way too much of a bitch for that.", ">>{10390} : breitbart is biased news for sure, but most of what's reported here is sourced from more unbiased or even left-biased (nytimes) sources. Worth reading if you can get past the gag reflex.", ">>{boones_farmer} : This isn't a debate. A debate is where two people argue different points and counter points. What the right wing noise machine is doing is just making shit up and trying to yell loudly.", '>>{tainted_waffles} : Obama attacked Romney for the same thing in 2012.', '>>{TurdFurgoson} : Oh ok. I didn\'t know that the CIA was "Left-Wing Fake News". Thanks for letting us know.', ">>{gindc} : I believe the Earth is generally spherical. What's your point other than name calling?", ">>{RealName_Arty_Morty} : HA! I don't doubt it - the man refuses to go to intelligence briefings so he has time to talk with people who blow smoke up his butt.", '>>{sheepforyourwood} : Spas out? I guess I can understand the need for a massage or a nice dip in a hot tub after realizing some voters actually fall for that shit.', ">>{gindc} : The article doesn't state the CIA is fake news. The article points out that the CIA and FBI disagree on many of the details of the Russian hacks. It's pretty clear if you read the article.", '>>{gindc} : Correct that\'s why I said it\'s "generally spherical". Here is the definition of "generally". Generally - in disregard of specific instances and with regard to an overall picture', '>>{epistemological} : Can we ban breitbart as state run propaganda yet? I think /r/politics should only allow reliable sources. In the meantime Ill keep reporting all their stories as blog spam.', '>>{MafiaVsNinja} : the Putin defense league flies into action! Breitbart is OK with conspiring with foreign powers to subvert our country. Treasonous fucks!', ">>{Chinesedoghandler} : Then you're doing something right. But it's not hard to be banned from there.", '>>{boones_farmer} : Yes, the whole fucking premise. The whole "hacked the election" thing is a bullshit strawman. The CIA is saying that the RNC was also hacked and the information was not released in order to tilt the scales in Republican\'s favor. That\'s a foreign entity meddling in our elections and should ultimately be public information. Moreover that\'s troubling as fuck for the same reasons Clinton\'s email server was troubling, if someone hacked it and we don\'t know the full extent we don\'t know what kind of leverage the hackers might have over party or elected officials. Could be nothing, could be something, but we, the voters, deserve to know. Most enraging is the fact that fucking Congress knew about this before the election, an no one said shit because McConnell, little fuckface that he is, threatened to make it a partisan issue. Do I blame McConnell for that, yes. Do I blame the fucking spineless Democrats for not coming out with it anyway, yes. The whole government\'s been fucked, the election process has been tampered with and half the fucking country is saying that\'s okay because their guy won. It\'s bullshit. Breitbart writing stupid articles saying "nuh, uh... the election wasn\'t hacked!" is missing the point that a foreign government very likely did hack key officials and used that information to swing the election. That\'s not "fake news" that\'s straight from a fucking CIA memo.', '>>{spazz720} : Yes...before the Russian military annexation of Crimea. Then he changed his tune.', ">>{gindc} : > The whole government's been fucked, the election process has been tampered with and half the fucking country is saying that's okay because their guy won. It's bullshit. It would have been the other half if Hillary had won. In fact this probably wouldn't even be a story. The CIA would have said nothing if Hillary won.", ">>{big_hey_22} : It's great how they've taken the deliberately misleading talking points that team Trump spewed on the Sunday shows (sometimes without even being asked) and put them into article form. Thats some top journalism.", '>>{avatar_of_internet} : > The CIA would have said nothing if Hillary won. What are you basing that on?', ">>{gindc} : A crystal ball of course. The same one liberals are using to say Hillary would have won if it weren't for those evil Russkis.", '>>{tainted_waffles} : Crimea voted to become part of Russia. Are we just ignoring that?', ">>{avatar_of_internet} : Always with the deflection. So you're saying that your opinion on that isn't based on anything concrete, just your.... feels?", '>>{gindc} : Yup, just like liberals that "feels" the election was rigged without evidence. We don\'t know. That\'s the thing about alternate futures. You just don\'t know.', '>>{avatar_of_internet} : Not even mostly. I just wanted to confirm that their opinions were based on nothing but contrarianism.', '>>{avatar_of_internet} : So, to be clear, you don\'t have any evidence that runs contrary to the idea that the election was "rigged" in some way? You have nothing at all?', ">>{gindc} : I've never seen evidence either way. Trump gets top-secret briefings. He's made it clear that the election wasn't rigged. That's good enough for me.", '>>{boones_farmer} : Don\'t pretend like that\'s not equally fucked. Eventually Trump fans are going to have to stop deflecting everything back to "yeah, but Hillary..." You\'re going to have to actually stand up for your fucking President or join us in opposing him and his fucked up agenda.', ">>{doughnut_fetish} : crimea doesn't have the legal standing to declare itself independent. law and order, remember?", ">>{gindc} : I do stand up for Trump. My stock portfolio is up 10% since the election. US Steel is up 100% since the election and the CEO plans to hire 10,000 new workers. That's fabulous. This is a great interview with the CEO of US Steel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JL31xeQK3BE", ">>{doughnut_fetish} : note to everyone: dbag OP got BTFO and now won't respond cause he's trying to spread fucking lies. deserves to be banned.", ">>{dongazine_supplies} : Article itself is *mostly* garbage but we could have used this as a good jumping off point. WHY is the mainstream media reporting on Russia's influence on the election as if it were news? It's not news, we've known about it for MONTHS. Why is it the hot story NOW? It's not to affect any change in the electoral college vote, that's not (practically) possible. So anyone on either side pushing a narrative that all of this discussion about Russian interference is an attempt to influence the EC is trying to hide the real agenda. What is it? MY TAKE is that the point of all this noise is to cover for the FBI and drown out any stories about Comey's weird moves. A bipartisan consensus to protect the credibility of the FBI makes sense to me.", ">>{boones_farmer} : Ahh... yes, deregulation. That always works out so well. Who do you think is going to get fucked? Union workers or the environment? Sounds like the environment, but we don't really need that anyway do we?", ">>{gindc} : > A bipartisan consensus to protect the credibility of the FBI makes sense to me. Either that or a bipartisan consensus to protect the credibility of the entire election process. But I agree there is something there that is being covered up and it's probably huge.", ">>{gindc} : I'm not the one resorting to incivility and name calling. Also not spreading any lies. Please be civil.", ">>{osay77} : The Russians know exactly how this works. They do this on their public all the time. Master gaslighters. I doubt they're shocked, but I'm sure they're pleased.", ">>{gindc} : If you watch the interview with the CEO of US Steel, he states that his company is required to treat waste water so that it has contaminant levels that are *below* what is found naturally. That's regulation gone amok. It's not even reasonable and makes it difficult for companies to operate in the US. Do we really want to force businesses out of the country by making up absurd regulations like this. It doesn't makes sense.", ">>{boones_farmer} : Yeah, it's not like chemicals don't build up in water supplies. That's not a thing... oh wait... yes, yes it is. If mercury levels are X parts per billion in the water supply, you still don't want to dump water containing X/2ppb into the water because the net effect is still *more fucking mercury*. I'm mean, you're looking at a guy that stands to profit literally billions by being able to pollute more and thinking, 'yeah, he's probably the best source of information on this'.", ">>{gindc} : He may profit from deregulation. But ultimately it will also mean more jobs. I don't have a problem with job creation.", '>>{10390} : I don\'t see it that way, at least this bit seems true and not misleading: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/11/us/politics/cia-judgment-intelligence-russia-hacking-evidence.html?_r=0 "Russia, they said, had intervened with the primary aim of helping make Donald J. Trump president. The C.I.A.’s conclusion does not appear to be the product of specific new intelligence obtained since the election, several American officials, including some who had read the agency’s briefing, said on Sunday. Rather, it was an analysis of what many believe is overwhelming circumstantial evidence — evidence that others feel does not support firm judgments — that the Russians put a thumb on the scale for Mr. Trump, and got their desired outcome. It is unclear why the C.I.A. did not produce this formal assessment before the election"', ">>{big_hey_22} : Right. They interfered with the election. They did it to hurt Hillary Clinton. Trump is the most pro-Russian of any US politician. It doesn't take much to get to 'they didn't hurt equally' which is helping Trump.", ">>{boones_farmer} : You're focusing on the wrong thing. I don't give a shit if this guy makes a truckload of money and creates jobs good for him, but if he does it by polluting the air and water then fuck him.", ">>{10390} : Is the issue that people believe the DNC leaks cost Clinton the election? If so I think that's not true, and that it was a setback that wouldn't have toppled a more reasonable candidate. Is the issue outrage over the US election being hacked by a foreign country? Then ok, but beware hypocrisy. Our hands are not remotely clean there. We even tapped Angela Merkel's phone. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/10/13/the-long-history-of-the-u-s-interfering-with-elections-elsewhere/?utm_term=.1ceb2359d0b8", ">>{gindc} : If we were to stop all pollution tomorrow, the US economy would collapse. You have to make compromises and concessions at some point. Reasonable regulations are fine. But many regulations aren't reasonable. Do you have a car? Do you have a zero impact on the environment? Of course you don't. We aren't going to ban cars just because they have a negative impact on the environment.", '>>{sleaze_bag_alert} : everything is fake news now except breitbart and maybe infowars. I watched yesterday as Trumpets called the articles from CNN and every other news source about Trump wanting to stay involved with Celebrity Apprentice "fake news"...not a single one of them replied when asked how it could be "fake" and if CNN just made it up why Trump\'s campaign manager was going on TV defending his decision to stay involved with CA. Is Kellyanne Conway just more liberal "fake news" now too? whatever, the entire thing was just a distraction anyways, it is better for Trump if we are worried about him being a TV star then if we are asking too many questions about the people he surrounds himself with and the things he might do in office.', ">>{johnknoefler} : And it's all true. You just didn't like the title.", '>>{johnknoefler} : > The president elect says, his own intelligence agency is spreading conspiracies and boycotts their briefings because "he is so smart", His complaint was that the briefings were often redundant and he doesn\'t need the same briefing every day as he can remember what they discussed the last time. Not sure how you can claim it\'s "his own intelligence agency". He\'s not taken office yet. "he is so smart" Who are you quoting?', ">>{johnknoefler} : > I think it's pretty telling that Republicans are calling for a congressional hearing into the matter. Sure. I've nothing against such an investigation. Then the liars should be jailed. And Trump should restore the law against USA propaganda and put real teeth in it with prison terms for government actors who violate it. http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/07/14/u-s-repeals-propaganda-ban-spreads-government-made-news-to-americans/", ">>{spazz720} : Didn't say anything about if it was true or false....just answered the question asked", ">>{doughnut_fetish} : >why aren't democrats calling for a congressional hearing? http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/chuck-schumer-russia-senate-election-inquiry-232464 spreading lies. no civility for trolls/liars.", '>>{johnknoefler} : This was the question asked. > What specifically is incorrect in the article? So you didn\'t answer that question. You bypassed it and ignored it and instead drew attention to the title which you claim is "Misleading Title". So, you are a liar.', ">>{spazz720} : Ummmm.....ok. I didn't bash the article though nor did I claim anything in it was true or false or fake.", '>>{gindc} : I guess the new civilities rules on /r/politics are just for people that support the president elect. Because you have called me a douche bag, a troll and a liar. And now you are stalking my comments. Very civil of you. Rule #1: Do not call other users **trolls**, morons, children, or anything else clever you may think of. Personal attacks, whether explicit or implicit, are not permitted.', '>>{doughnut_fetish} : Stalking your comments? Where the fuck did I do that? You are a liar. You made a ridiculous statement that you knew was false. I proved you wrong. Go away, special snowflake.', '>>{gindc} : Incivility will result in a **permanent ban** from the subreddit.', ">>{boones_farmer} : Pollution is a big problem and one the previous generation has already kicked the can on, if we do that to we're going to face serious consequences that are a lot worse than jobs disappearing. There is however a good solution, start investing heavily in new technologies. Renewables will be a trillion dollar industry and we can either lead the world in it or lose those jobs to other countries. Currently, we're on the path of losing those jobs and I'll tell you what, that's a lot more than 10,000 jobs.", '>>{hidingplaininsight} : My point is that there are not necessarily "two sides" to every argument that need airing. If a picture of Earth from space got to the front page and you saw a comment saying "Why are you suppressing the other side of this debate?" you would say we don\'t have to argue with facts, right? Same with evolution, same with this. I\'m all for acknowledging that there is an inherent uncertainty in our knowledge (for instance, as far as I understand, a Russian link to Podesta\'s hack hasn\'t been proven for certain yet--or, at least, information about it hasn\'t been widely reported on), but I don\'t think this is a situation where one can credibly claim "two sides". "Pizzagate" is a similar example, where conspiracy theorists can\'t understand why "their side" isn\'t being taken up by anyone remotely credible. Citing the company run by Trump\'s "Chief Strategist", which is attempting to spike a story critical of Trump--which is taken up by every facet of government not directly linked to Trump--seems rather biased and suspicious, no? If the answer is "No, there is a broad conspiracy to undermine my worldview" then you\'re acting like a flat-earther or any other conspiracy theorist.', ">>{gindc} : I'm not a flat-earther. I don't care how many times you repeat the slur.", '>>{doughnut_fetish} : I noticed you continue to ignore the fact that you lied and got proven to be spreading lies :(']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{gindc} : 10 Ways the CIA’s ‘Russian Hacking’ Story is Left-Wing ‘Fake News’', '>>{awesomeness0232} : Probably because it\'s partisan, propagandist garbage. I honestly don\'t understand how anyone can justify criticizing HuffPo and then defending Breitbart other than "I only like it when news sites reaffirm my opinions".', '>>{Honoluuluu} : ITT Liberals who are fine with the unadulterated shit that is Huffington Post, but spas out when Breitbart is linked', ">>{DebussySIMiami} : 1) We don't like it. 2)-10) See #1.", '>>{gindc} : I think it\'s pretty telling that Republicans are calling for a congressional hearing into the matter. Let\'s bring all the facts to light. There does seem to be disagreement between the CIA and FBI. So lets hear that debate. "Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) pledged to support a congressional investigation into whether Russian hacking affected the 2016 election. Republicans have nothing to fear from such an investigation, because they won the election fair and square." Why aren\'t Democrats calling for a congressional hearing? Are they too embarrassed by what happened at the DNC? Is there more information they are trying to hide?', ">>{AndrewRyansRapture} : You realize there's a gulf of difference between biased liberal paper and state supported mouthpiece outlet, right?", ">>{gindc} : LOL. Yeah, got called a Nazi the last time I posted a Breitbart article. It was just a biography piece on the new DHS secretary. It wasn't the least bit controversial or incorrect.", '>>{Rupperrt} : didn\'t know CIA was a news agency. The whole thing is almost hilarious. Putin must be laughing his ass off. The president elect says, his own intelligence agency is spreading conspiracies and boycotts their briefings because "he is so smart", while FBI lost all reputation with Comey and the main defense industry cooperation looses billions in worth. US has become a banana republic within weeks. China and Russia are the new overlords I guess.', '>>{Morchaint} : Democrats are calling for a congressional hearing. Schumer and McCain are calling for a bipartisan special committee. McConnell is calling for it to be investigated in a closed door committee, he is on and Republicans control.', ">>{TurdFurgoson} : >Why aren't Democrats calling for a congressional hearing? Are they too embarrassed by what happened at the DNC? Is there more information they are trying to hide? WTF? Chuck Schumer was one of the first people calling for this. Or did Breitbart not report that?", '>>{nonades} : So, when did Arianna Huffington get hired by the Clinton Campaign during the election?', ">>{malpais} : You're busted Brietbart. You can't get your boy out of this one comrade.", '>>{CMDR-Ad-Victoriam} : McConnell wants to use the republican controlled SIC to dictate the outcome instead of a special committee like what McCain wanted. You are a disingenuous liar sir. This is about controlling the outcome, not getting to the truth of the matter. Edit - >ruling out a special committee and instead saying the Senate Intelligence Committee could proceed with the probe.', ">>{gindc} : Um. No I don't think so. People should have access to both sides of the debate. I don't support censorship.", '>>{awesomeness0232} : The thing is, Breitbart is so overtly invested in Trump that there\'s really no hope of getting "truth" from anything they write. I understand that it\'s hard to sort through media bias, but getting news from Breitbart is as good as forming your opinions on Trump based on what Trump thinks you should think of him.', '>>{mikes94} : Fake news. Down vote it and move on. Its all we can do.', ">>{RealName_Arty_Morty} : > one is telling me the sky is blue Fact > and the other it's green Breitbart news", '>>{MolestedConservative} : Breitbart has publicly attacked people who mentioned Russia and the cold war. Apparently "liberals are attempting to rewrite history by claiming Russia, *not Cuba,* was focus of the cold war.', '>>{DragonPup} : > People should have access to both sides of the debate. That is textbook false equivalence.', '>>{Chinesedoghandler} : Brietbart and conservatives are so fond of making lists. Why have one good point when you can have 9 lies and one half-truth packaged together?', ">>{malpais} : It's simpler to just vote it down into the dirt where it belongs.", ">>{10390} : breitbart is biased news for sure, but most of what's reported here is sourced from more unbiased or even left-biased (nytimes) sources. Worth reading if you can get past the gag reflex.", ">>{boones_farmer} : This isn't a debate. A debate is where two people argue different points and counter points. What the right wing noise machine is doing is just making shit up and trying to yell loudly.", '>>{tainted_waffles} : Obama attacked Romney for the same thing in 2012.', '>>{TurdFurgoson} : Oh ok. I didn\'t know that the CIA was "Left-Wing Fake News". Thanks for letting us know.', ">>{gindc} : I believe the Earth is generally spherical. What's your point other than name calling?", ">>{RealName_Arty_Morty} : HA! I don't doubt it - the man refuses to go to intelligence briefings so he has time to talk with people who blow smoke up his butt.", '>>{sheepforyourwood} : Spas out? I guess I can understand the need for a massage or a nice dip in a hot tub after realizing some voters actually fall for that shit.', ">>{gindc} : The article doesn't state the CIA is fake news. The article points out that the CIA and FBI disagree on many of the details of the Russian hacks. It's pretty clear if you read the article.", '>>{gindc} : Correct that\'s why I said it\'s "generally spherical". Here is the definition of "generally". Generally - in disregard of specific instances and with regard to an overall picture', '>>{epistemological} : Can we ban breitbart as state run propaganda yet? I think /r/politics should only allow reliable sources. In the meantime Ill keep reporting all their stories as blog spam.', '>>{MafiaVsNinja} : the Putin defense league flies into action! Breitbart is OK with conspiring with foreign powers to subvert our country. Treasonous fucks!', ">>{Chinesedoghandler} : Then you're doing something right. But it's not hard to be banned from there.", '>>{boones_farmer} : Yes, the whole fucking premise. The whole "hacked the election" thing is a bullshit strawman. The CIA is saying that the RNC was also hacked and the information was not released in order to tilt the scales in Republican\'s favor. That\'s a foreign entity meddling in our elections and should ultimately be public information. Moreover that\'s troubling as fuck for the same reasons Clinton\'s email server was troubling, if someone hacked it and we don\'t know the full extent we don\'t know what kind of leverage the hackers might have over party or elected officials. Could be nothing, could be something, but we, the voters, deserve to know. Most enraging is the fact that fucking Congress knew about this before the election, an no one said shit because McConnell, little fuckface that he is, threatened to make it a partisan issue. Do I blame McConnell for that, yes. Do I blame the fucking spineless Democrats for not coming out with it anyway, yes. The whole government\'s been fucked, the election process has been tampered with and half the fucking country is saying that\'s okay because their guy won. It\'s bullshit. Breitbart writing stupid articles saying "nuh, uh... the election wasn\'t hacked!" is missing the point that a foreign government very likely did hack key officials and used that information to swing the election. That\'s not "fake news" that\'s straight from a fucking CIA memo.', '>>{spazz720} : Yes...before the Russian military annexation of Crimea. Then he changed his tune.', ">>{gindc} : > The whole government's been fucked, the election process has been tampered with and half the fucking country is saying that's okay because their guy won. It's bullshit. It would have been the other half if Hillary had won. In fact this probably wouldn't even be a story. The CIA would have said nothing if Hillary won.", ">>{big_hey_22} : It's great how they've taken the deliberately misleading talking points that team Trump spewed on the Sunday shows (sometimes without even being asked) and put them into article form. Thats some top journalism.", '>>{avatar_of_internet} : > The CIA would have said nothing if Hillary won. What are you basing that on?', ">>{gindc} : A crystal ball of course. The same one liberals are using to say Hillary would have won if it weren't for those evil Russkis.", '>>{tainted_waffles} : Crimea voted to become part of Russia. Are we just ignoring that?', ">>{avatar_of_internet} : Always with the deflection. So you're saying that your opinion on that isn't based on anything concrete, just your.... feels?", '>>{gindc} : Yup, just like liberals that "feels" the election was rigged without evidence. We don\'t know. That\'s the thing about alternate futures. You just don\'t know.', '>>{avatar_of_internet} : Not even mostly. I just wanted to confirm that their opinions were based on nothing but contrarianism.', '>>{avatar_of_internet} : So, to be clear, you don\'t have any evidence that runs contrary to the idea that the election was "rigged" in some way? You have nothing at all?', ">>{gindc} : I've never seen evidence either way. Trump gets top-secret briefings. He's made it clear that the election wasn't rigged. That's good enough for me.", '>>{boones_farmer} : Don\'t pretend like that\'s not equally fucked. Eventually Trump fans are going to have to stop deflecting everything back to "yeah, but Hillary..." You\'re going to have to actually stand up for your fucking President or join us in opposing him and his fucked up agenda.', ">>{doughnut_fetish} : crimea doesn't have the legal standing to declare itself independent. law and order, remember?", ">>{gindc} : I do stand up for Trump. My stock portfolio is up 10% since the election. US Steel is up 100% since the election and the CEO plans to hire 10,000 new workers. That's fabulous. This is a great interview with the CEO of US Steel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JL31xeQK3BE", ">>{doughnut_fetish} : note to everyone: dbag OP got BTFO and now won't respond cause he's trying to spread fucking lies. deserves to be banned.", ">>{dongazine_supplies} : Article itself is *mostly* garbage but we could have used this as a good jumping off point. WHY is the mainstream media reporting on Russia's influence on the election as if it were news? It's not news, we've known about it for MONTHS. Why is it the hot story NOW? It's not to affect any change in the electoral college vote, that's not (practically) possible. So anyone on either side pushing a narrative that all of this discussion about Russian interference is an attempt to influence the EC is trying to hide the real agenda. What is it? MY TAKE is that the point of all this noise is to cover for the FBI and drown out any stories about Comey's weird moves. A bipartisan consensus to protect the credibility of the FBI makes sense to me.", ">>{boones_farmer} : Ahh... yes, deregulation. That always works out so well. Who do you think is going to get fucked? Union workers or the environment? Sounds like the environment, but we don't really need that anyway do we?", ">>{gindc} : > A bipartisan consensus to protect the credibility of the FBI makes sense to me. Either that or a bipartisan consensus to protect the credibility of the entire election process. But I agree there is something there that is being covered up and it's probably huge.", ">>{gindc} : I'm not the one resorting to incivility and name calling. Also not spreading any lies. Please be civil.", ">>{osay77} : The Russians know exactly how this works. They do this on their public all the time. Master gaslighters. I doubt they're shocked, but I'm sure they're pleased.", ">>{gindc} : If you watch the interview with the CEO of US Steel, he states that his company is required to treat waste water so that it has contaminant levels that are *below* what is found naturally. That's regulation gone amok. It's not even reasonable and makes it difficult for companies to operate in the US. Do we really want to force businesses out of the country by making up absurd regulations like this. It doesn't makes sense.", ">>{boones_farmer} : Yeah, it's not like chemicals don't build up in water supplies. That's not a thing... oh wait... yes, yes it is. If mercury levels are X parts per billion in the water supply, you still don't want to dump water containing X/2ppb into the water because the net effect is still *more fucking mercury*. I'm mean, you're looking at a guy that stands to profit literally billions by being able to pollute more and thinking, 'yeah, he's probably the best source of information on this'.", ">>{gindc} : He may profit from deregulation. But ultimately it will also mean more jobs. I don't have a problem with job creation.", '>>{10390} : I don\'t see it that way, at least this bit seems true and not misleading: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/11/us/politics/cia-judgment-intelligence-russia-hacking-evidence.html?_r=0 "Russia, they said, had intervened with the primary aim of helping make Donald J. Trump president. The C.I.A.’s conclusion does not appear to be the product of specific new intelligence obtained since the election, several American officials, including some who had read the agency’s briefing, said on Sunday. Rather, it was an analysis of what many believe is overwhelming circumstantial evidence — evidence that others feel does not support firm judgments — that the Russians put a thumb on the scale for Mr. Trump, and got their desired outcome. It is unclear why the C.I.A. did not produce this formal assessment before the election"', ">>{big_hey_22} : Right. They interfered with the election. They did it to hurt Hillary Clinton. Trump is the most pro-Russian of any US politician. It doesn't take much to get to 'they didn't hurt equally' which is helping Trump.", ">>{boones_farmer} : You're focusing on the wrong thing. I don't give a shit if this guy makes a truckload of money and creates jobs good for him, but if he does it by polluting the air and water then fuck him.", ">>{10390} : Is the issue that people believe the DNC leaks cost Clinton the election? If so I think that's not true, and that it was a setback that wouldn't have toppled a more reasonable candidate. Is the issue outrage over the US election being hacked by a foreign country? Then ok, but beware hypocrisy. Our hands are not remotely clean there. We even tapped Angela Merkel's phone. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/10/13/the-long-history-of-the-u-s-interfering-with-elections-elsewhere/?utm_term=.1ceb2359d0b8", ">>{gindc} : If we were to stop all pollution tomorrow, the US economy would collapse. You have to make compromises and concessions at some point. Reasonable regulations are fine. But many regulations aren't reasonable. Do you have a car? Do you have a zero impact on the environment? Of course you don't. We aren't going to ban cars just because they have a negative impact on the environment.", '>>{sleaze_bag_alert} : everything is fake news now except breitbart and maybe infowars. I watched yesterday as Trumpets called the articles from CNN and every other news source about Trump wanting to stay involved with Celebrity Apprentice "fake news"...not a single one of them replied when asked how it could be "fake" and if CNN just made it up why Trump\'s campaign manager was going on TV defending his decision to stay involved with CA. Is Kellyanne Conway just more liberal "fake news" now too? whatever, the entire thing was just a distraction anyways, it is better for Trump if we are worried about him being a TV star then if we are asking too many questions about the people he surrounds himself with and the things he might do in office.', ">>{johnknoefler} : And it's all true. You just didn't like the title.", '>>{johnknoefler} : > The president elect says, his own intelligence agency is spreading conspiracies and boycotts their briefings because "he is so smart", His complaint was that the briefings were often redundant and he doesn\'t need the same briefing every day as he can remember what they discussed the last time. Not sure how you can claim it\'s "his own intelligence agency". He\'s not taken office yet. "he is so smart" Who are you quoting?', ">>{johnknoefler} : > I think it's pretty telling that Republicans are calling for a congressional hearing into the matter. Sure. I've nothing against such an investigation. Then the liars should be jailed. And Trump should restore the law against USA propaganda and put real teeth in it with prison terms for government actors who violate it. http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/07/14/u-s-repeals-propaganda-ban-spreads-government-made-news-to-americans/", ">>{spazz720} : Didn't say anything about if it was true or false....just answered the question asked", ">>{doughnut_fetish} : >why aren't democrats calling for a congressional hearing? http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/chuck-schumer-russia-senate-election-inquiry-232464 spreading lies. no civility for trolls/liars.", '>>{johnknoefler} : This was the question asked. > What specifically is incorrect in the article? So you didn\'t answer that question. You bypassed it and ignored it and instead drew attention to the title which you claim is "Misleading Title". So, you are a liar.', ">>{spazz720} : Ummmm.....ok. I didn't bash the article though nor did I claim anything in it was true or false or fake.", '>>{gindc} : I guess the new civilities rules on /r/politics are just for people that support the president elect. Because you have called me a douche bag, a troll and a liar. And now you are stalking my comments. Very civil of you. Rule #1: Do not call other users **trolls**, morons, children, or anything else clever you may think of. Personal attacks, whether explicit or implicit, are not permitted.', '>>{doughnut_fetish} : Stalking your comments? Where the fuck did I do that? You are a liar. You made a ridiculous statement that you knew was false. I proved you wrong. Go away, special snowflake.', '>>{gindc} : Incivility will result in a **permanent ban** from the subreddit.', ">>{boones_farmer} : Pollution is a big problem and one the previous generation has already kicked the can on, if we do that to we're going to face serious consequences that are a lot worse than jobs disappearing. There is however a good solution, start investing heavily in new technologies. Renewables will be a trillion dollar industry and we can either lead the world in it or lose those jobs to other countries. Currently, we're on the path of losing those jobs and I'll tell you what, that's a lot more than 10,000 jobs.", '>>{hidingplaininsight} : My point is that there are not necessarily "two sides" to every argument that need airing. If a picture of Earth from space got to the front page and you saw a comment saying "Why are you suppressing the other side of this debate?" you would say we don\'t have to argue with facts, right? Same with evolution, same with this. I\'m all for acknowledging that there is an inherent uncertainty in our knowledge (for instance, as far as I understand, a Russian link to Podesta\'s hack hasn\'t been proven for certain yet--or, at least, information about it hasn\'t been widely reported on), but I don\'t think this is a situation where one can credibly claim "two sides". "Pizzagate" is a similar example, where conspiracy theorists can\'t understand why "their side" isn\'t being taken up by anyone remotely credible. Citing the company run by Trump\'s "Chief Strategist", which is attempting to spike a story critical of Trump--which is taken up by every facet of government not directly linked to Trump--seems rather biased and suspicious, no? If the answer is "No, there is a broad conspiracy to undermine my worldview" then you\'re acting like a flat-earther or any other conspiracy theorist.', ">>{gindc} : I'm not a flat-earther. I don't care how many times you repeat the slur.", '>>{doughnut_fetish} : I noticed you continue to ignore the fact that you lied and got proven to be spreading lies :('], [">>{justicefishy} : Coulter: Trump is victim of 'media rape'", '>>{Stellaaahhhh} : If there were some way to force Coulter and Trump into a two person human centipede, I would be super in favor of that.', '>>{justicefishy} : Yep. Apparently taking words in context and repeating them verbatim is media rape now.', ">>{Dan_The_Manimal} : Strong candidates don't allow that to happen. Strong candidates find a new country.", ">>{stormeaglex1} : It's hilarious how it's even a thought in the heads of some people that Donald fucking Trump is a victim in all of this", ">>{h3rring} : I'm upvoting this just because it proves how delusional the alt-right is.", '>>{Triggered_Trump} : Professional Psychotic Ex-Girlfriend Ann Coulter says: PAY ATTENTION TO ME!!!!!!!!!!!', '>>{wraithtek} : Donald Trump is the victim of truth, facts, and direct quotes.', '>>{ashstronge} : Ann Coulter just says the most controversial and provocative right wing thing she can think of. It is all to get media attention and publicity in order to stay relevant. Best just to leave her to it and just nod your head when she comes over.', ">>{Dan_The_Manimal} : If it's a legitimate media rape, the campaign has ways to try to shut that whole thing down", '>>{SultanObama} : Hold on, did the campaign clearly state "Please don\'t rape me"? If not, this is clearly not a rape but consensual buttfuckery', ">>{SultanObama} : Look, even if the RNC was raped by the media, the disaster baby formed is God's will and cannot be aborted. I'm sorry republicans, but you're stuck with Trump.", '>>{ABTechie} : Stop listening to this woman. Stop giving her media time. Her job is to same offensive things to generate media time. Stop giving her media time.', '>>{MFG1628} : It\'s funny how the same people who have no problem when the media makes up stories that fit their agenda all of a sudden call for media bias when the "liberal media" attacks their candidate. It\'s like they completely ignore how Fox News has attacked Obama for the past 8 years, regardless of facts. On top of it all the media is literally just stating things directly from Trumps mouth. They\'re getting mad at the wrong person, and look like fools doing it.', ">>{JukeboxVoice} : Ann Coulter is hilarious. Very offensive, duh... but it's all intentionally crafted. I register her speech the same way I register the speech in comedy movies. Sometimes she's actually really funny, and you can tell there's actually a person under there. She will say something so outrageously wrong and bigoted and then laugh. It's like a weird mixture of psychosis and self-awareness. She knows it's absurd... but this is the career she has made... so now she has to keep behaving in this way... She boarded a train going in the wrong direction and now can't disembark.", ">>{mattsoca} : She's the replacement for the Weekly World News. Expecting a Hillary=BatBoy tweet from her sometime soon.", '>>{foolmanchoo} : Here come the Trumplethinskins to use their victim card for poor wittle Trumpy.', ">>{metaobject} : Apparently, they're supposed to either find a new career or a new job", '>>{metaobject} : One time I heard her call in to another radio show (maybe Hannity, who knows?) and she legit sounded drunk. She was slurring her speech and everything. Does anyone know if there have been reports of her having a drinking problem?', '>>{Dr_Straw-man} : If it was a legitimate media rape, the body has a way to shut it down.', ">>{mwsomerset} : I don't know about the drinking but Adam Corolla sure was having none of it... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4hacmvSPaI", '>>{InFearn0} : [She has to get all rape term usage out of her system before she has to switch to writing cook books and romance novels.](http://wonkette.com/605053/ann-coulter-threatens-to-give-up-and-write-cookbooks-and-mysteries-if-trump-loses-oh-no)', '>>{ivsciguy} : I really wanted them to cast her as Umbridge in Harry Potter.', '>>{TuLegit2quit} : She will say what ever it takes to sell books. She does not care who wins. She just needs to have a platform to make inflammatory statements.', ">>{Monalisa9298} : She's way too much of a bitch for that."]]

classify and reply

['>>{Donald_Fanz} : Trump Tweets his anger that Kellyanne Conway interview cut short', '>>{cookiemonster777} : this is like magazine cover worthy! An absolutely beautiful photo', ">>{todayilearned83} : Oh look, another shit spam site that the broken automod won't pick up.", ">>{iAmRadic} : Can we stop the 7 Plus photos already? We get it, it's good, but there's a reason we have rules in here. Read them.", ">>{Jaxx_Teller} : Well whenever Ms. Conway goes to speak on CBS they constantly are interrupting her the entire time. She starts saying something, and half way through her sentence they start patronizing her, forcing her to explain what she was originally trying to explain in the first place. It's fucking mind-boggling to watch - my whole family watches it for the mere reason to see how much Charlie and the others start going off on their own tangents instead of letting Ms. Conway explain herself. It's laughable, my parents are very confused as to why they do this.\u202d", '>>{Quinnjester} : Christ sake this woman is on a roll lately...', '>>{twojimbean} : Yea. I was thinking that as I posted it but said screw it.', ">>{lombar77} : Synopsis: *Rachel Maddow reports on the sudden, unexpected purge of 46 U.S. attorneys from the Justice Department, including Preet Bharara, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, who has been asked personally by Donald Trump to stay on.* Timing sure seems fishy especially with everything else Maddow has been reporting on. Ties into her first segment of the night that's already been posted. /Edit. See this post http://reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5yqt7n/maddow_pence_story_on_flynn_impossible_to_believe/ by /u/WmPitcher.", '>>{sloppyFarts} : The bright part is actually the line of a letter. If I have more time at work I will make more photos, possible to 100x.', ">>{grin_and_bexar_it} : Wahhh why won't journalists let her go on there and spew lies without interruption?", ">>{amiiboness6} : If you can watch Kelly Anne Conway during an interview and not recognize she's full of lies/spin then you need some lessons in some critical thinking or I have a house to sell you.", '>>{twojimbean} : Jesus! Who s#%t in your cereal.', ">>{Jaxx_Teller} : If she's going to spew lies, at least let her do that then so we can call her bluff. They don't even let her do that. No details of Trump's actions can be summarized from her interview despite her trying to articulate what is going on because she is shut down half-way through every response she gives.", ">>{readerseven} : Why It's Possible George H.W. Bush Could Vote for Clinton", '>>{dyzo-blue} : Let me guess: like the rest of us, he has realized that Trump is a vile racist ignorant clown Bush is a decent man, and decent men do not vote for racist pieces of shit.', '>>{BoredPork} : Questions like: who has the pee tape and when are we going to see it, and wtf is wrong these people defending Trump.😂', '>>{elduderino1234} : Can somebody zoom in 10x on the bright part of this picture under a microscope on their iPhone?', '>>{jared_number_two} : And post a photo showing how you took the picture.', '>>{24Willard} : Also trump asteroid smashed the family name by reducing jeb to please clap. Bushes gotta be salty', ">>{tobsn} : in doing DMLS right now and it's printing at 0.016mm makes it all the sudden even more impressive...", '>>{lombar77} : Hell yes she has. Hoping she puts a synopsis together of all for us next week or the week after. Would love to see half her show dedicated to cliffs notes version.', '>>{ZaphodBoone} : Reminds me when I was a kid and looking straight into the soul of our good old cathode ray tube color TV by standing 2 inches from the screen.', ">>{carbs90} : But they AGs usually leave when administration's transition over? Just playing devil's advocate here, but explain how process is different than ones that preceded it?", ">>{joepo32} : Because every response she gives are lies and nonsense. They interrupt her because if they don't she will just talk about nothing and continue to deflect the entire time.", ">>{Jaxx_Teller} : How can you come to that conclusion, when she isn't even allowed to lie if she wanted to? You cannot summarize anything from her interviews because she is interrupted half-way through everything she responds with, regardless of the content. The interviewers just go off on their own tangents. They don't let her lie even if that was her intention. If she's going to lie, at least let her do that so we can call her bluff, but to come to the conclusion that all she does is lie would be incorrect because she's never even been able to finish a sentence in her response to questions.", '>>{IvankaDrumpf} : Watching his son get verbally raped on stage repeatedly might have had something to do with it.', ">>{iAmRadic} : Do you say that every time someone tells you you're breaking the rules?", '>>{BerningSandals} : Exactly! No Bush is going to vote for Trump *ever*.', ">>{Jaxx_Teller} : Or, if they don't interrupt her, **she will respond to the literal question at hand.** Instead, I watch her get interviewed by CBS and not only have I wasted my time, but my IQ has dropped around 10 points and I start to question my entire reality as I watch someone who is supposed to give information about what is happening with Trump and the White House, and all I am able to salvage is that the interviewers are trying to belittle and bully this woman for reasons beyond my comprehension. I want to actually hear what the hell is going on, I don't care about the opinions of the newscasters. People want to actually hear what she has to say, regardless of whether you hate her guts or not. Except for you, it seems you would rather live in an echo chamber like r/politics.", ">>{UnaClocker} : 7p? Gag. There's this symbol in your keyboard that is short for Plus. It looks like this: +", '>>{graay_ghost} : They leave when their replacement is ready generally. In this case, there is none.', ">>{svn} : Try not to have so much fun or you'll pee yourself", ">>{joepo32} : >Or, if they don't interrupt her, she will respond to the literal question at hand. When has she ever actually answered the question at hand? If you are waiting for that to happen and think it is because journalist don't let her ramble about nothing for the allotted time to avoid giving real answers then you are greatly mistaken and will be waiting a very long time. >I want to actually hear what the hell is going on, I don't care about the opinions of the newscasters. When she speaks she isn't going to say what is actually going on. It has never been a campaign strategy. Nor will that be a policy during his presidency. She is simply there to spout nonsense and lie to keep people distracted. She is only there to tell people what they think those people want to hear. >People want to actually hear what she has to say Then she should actually answer questions. Instead she rambles on about issue not being asked about. Then journalist have to interrupt her and try to get her back to the question. Then she rambles more and people like you complain they don't let her talk. They shouldn't be letting her talk about what ever she wishes. She should be answering the questions they ask. It is there job to interrupt her and try to keep her on topic and check her honesty.", ">>{twojimbean} : Nope. I just figured it was a cool picture and simply wanted to share it. Didn't realize I'd ruin people's days over.", '>>{twojimbean} : Man, you guys are brutal in here. Smh but thanks for that buddy. Lol', ">>{Mykem} : From Anandtech's analysis of the display on the iPhone 6 which is very much similar to that of the iPhone 6s and 7 especially when it comes to the use of dual domain pixels (which is why the pixels are chevron-shaped): http://i.imgur.com/TfkFyPO.jpg http://www.anandtech.com/show/8554/the-iphone-6-review/8", ">>{lombar77} : Quite often yes but it's usally quite orderly and in fact they agreed to an orderly replacement of these attorneys early in the year. Only thing fairy comparable was Reno in 93 and even that was less purge like. If you haven't seen her report yet I'd suggest taking a peak. Only like 7 minutes. And the first segment of the night is well worth a watch first.", ">>{Windstorm2002} : I used to be able to see individual pixels by looking closely, now on my 1080p iPhone 7 plus I can barely see pixels any more, I can't imagine when we get 4k phones", ">>{gnarlygod} : It isn't possible, it is a certainty. Bush is voting for Clinton, he said so on CNN today.", '>>{CoffeeLinuxWeights} : 4k phones exist, if you know what I mean.', ">>{iAmRadic} : > Rules > > Image posts with iPhone photography will be removed. Try /r/iPhonePictures, /r/iphoneography, or /r/itookapicture. All i'm saying, is you can just go ahead and put this where it belongs.", ">>{sneakpeekbot} : **Here's a sneak peek of /r/iphonepictures using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/iphonepictures/top/?sort=top&t=year) of the year!** \\#1: [Everything Need Know iPhone 7 Price,Release Date,Features](http://www.telecominfo.org/everything-need-know-iphone-7-pricerelease-datefeatures/) | [0 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/iphonepictures/comments/4wm9dm/everything_need_know_iphone_7_pricerelease/) \\#2: [I was told y'all might like these bee pics, shot with my 7+](http://imgur.com/a/buQF9) | [6 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/iphonepictures/comments/5bmyh9/i_was_told_yall_might_like_these_bee_pics_shot/) \\#3: [Rejected 'Shot on iPhone' Commercial](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGlDsQRUQXA) | [0 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/iphonepictures/comments/55bj7b/rejected_shot_on_iphone_commercial/) ---- ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| [^^Contact ^^me](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| [^^Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| [^^Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/5lveo6/blacklist/)", '>>{tau-lepton} : Gee, I wonder what 46 highly talented lawyers who understand the vulnerabilities of the Justice Department are going to do for a living.', ">>{ceslek} : Probably because people (volunteers) don't spend their entire days modding subreddits.", '>>{Narkova} : Why do I need to "get a life" if all I asked was a question? I think you\'re the one who needs a life 😉', ">>{cookiemonster777} : that's why he got down voted. some people can be petty. dw about it. 7p, 7+, whatever. he missed the point clearly :P", ">>{sloppyFarts} : Sorry I don't remember... Forgot to say that this was taken in landscape.", '>>{rwilso7} : You had to be alive then to know this, but H.W Bush was as much reviled and lampooned as Trump is today. Neil Young wrote a song basically calling him a murder, Hollywood celebrities said they were moving to Canada, and when Bush got sick on camera he was laughed at in a way Hillary is protected from. Liberals always say the Republican is the devil, so who cares?', '>>{FAT_ORANGE_DRUMPF} : Hillary is gonna win anyway. Might as well be on the right side of history and avoid being lumped in with the deplorables.', ">>{escalation} : Two reasons. They've basically both been playing on team Neo-Oligarch for a long time. The other reason is that Trump humiliated Jeb big time, so it's kinda personal at this point.", '>>{lombar77} : Oh and apparently Hannity was railing last night about how Trump needs to get rid of Obama people on his show last night and specifically brought up what Reno did in 93. Wonder where this magnificent and ass saving idea came from?', '>>{RobeFlax} : Was alive. He was much more capable and competent as a leader than Trump.', '>>{SaxonPimp} : It is precisely this type of unmitigated alarmist horse-pucky that erodes confidence in the media. EVERY incoming administration purges the opposition attorneys. Obama did it, Bush did it, Clinton did it. But now that TRUMP is doing it AHHHhhhhh!!!', '>>{Xelphif} : And then a picture of how you took the picture of you taking first picture.', '>>{burritocmdr} : Be sure to use this image for your analysis, so I can see pixels of pixels, on my pixel display', ">>{bongggblue} : Nah, it's usually been done in a professional manner with regards to the work those offices do, and usually allow the previous person to stay on til their replacement is named, as to not disrupt current ongoing investigations and open cases. Clinton did it with Janet Reno in 93, but they did it in a more organized manner, not less than a day's notice, but can't expect this administration to behave like adults and give common professional courtesy. At least this will get the news cycle off Jeff Sessions and Flynn's bullshit for the weekend, and disrupt any ongoing investigations on the Trump campaign for a few days.", '>>{Axewhipe} : Thanks. (Posted so I can see later)', '>>{Rellek_} : instructions unclear. just peed on my cat, who is named Pixel. Edit: fun was still had, just not as intended.', '>>{Binion206} : A perfect example of how the "Democratic" party has shifted to the right.', '>>{TheRusCIAn} : [President Bill Clinton, summarily fired all 93 U.S. Attorneys on a single day, March 23, 1993.](http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1817411/posts)', '>>{loungeboy79} : And the only way that trump can beat this record is to hire lawyers and then fire them for failing to protect him.', '>>{Brady_55} : And how does him voting for her mean the democrats have shifted to the right?', '>>{Quinnjester} : Nah the Jeff stuff is still strong. And the media is more worried about stone.', ">>{Brady_55} : Yup. Let's hear it. How does this mean they moved to the right? I'm alll ears.", ">>{AlexTraner} : Your eyesight is better than mine. When. I go to the eye doctor I'm going to say that I want to be able to see the pixels on my phone!", '>>{milosreturn} : This sham of a presidency is falling apart at the seams and he knows it', ">>{ilikeyoohoo} : This isn't remotely true. Sure, of course liberals didn't like H.W. Bush. But, he isn't comparable to Trump whatsoever. And, obviously, people made a joke of his vomiting on camera. That would happen to any politician. Edit: I don't see how Hillary is protected from people making fun of her. Especially in the age of internet and memes.", '>>{TwoOhEight} : Let the game of Hangman commence. Is it the letter t?', ">>{Rezrov_} : They're replaced once their replacement has been confirmed or at least nominated. They don't usually just leave a massive hole of vacant positions.", '>>{Y0upi} : No. Not quite often. It has happened. It is not regular or often.', ">>{lombar77} : Apparently it is fairly common when there is a partisan change of the presidency. It's just not commonly done this one was.", '>>{avEmonsta} : So this means that the display is highly accurate?', '>>{pushpin} : I can see it now. The HBO miniseries will open with Wiener sexting his junk and the final scene Trump will be watching some golden showers. Or prison could work, too.', '>>{peepeepresident} : Another warning sign of impending dictatorship: dismissing people loyal to institutions. It was done at the state department and is now happening at the justice department. This is a purge.', '>>{onatiko} : 2K phones are real and its 2x more pixels. If that iPhone display amazes you, you should try a GS7', ">>{FireNexus} : Not really. She's Fox Newsing at least this one story. Asking for the resignations of political appointees so you can fill the positions is ordinary.", ">>{Binion206} : You know something is wrong with your candidate if Bush supports her. People who care about policy are cringing at this news. What's the point of the Democratic Party if you rejoice when you get the support from the leader of the opposing party.", ">>{vanker} : I believe typically they don't do that until they have somebody ready to fill that position, and that's not the case here.", ">>{badfordabidness} : I believe asking someone to resign is a pretty weird thing to do after you made a big show of inviting them to your private residence and asking them to stay on mere months ago. Preet Bharara has been pretty fearless in going after Wall Street types (grading on a curve here). He's also been tenacious about going after corrupt politicians. Almost every corrupt politician in his jurisdiction (Manhattan) is a Democrat. Trump and his base have almost every reason to love a Democrat who takes down corrupt Democrats. The *one* reason they have not to? Well, that would be Mr. Bharara's ability to investigate the single major Republican politician whose private residence and corporate interests DO fall within his jurisdiction.", ">>{NickVanExellence} : They haven't even filled the current vacancies. This is highly unusual and irresponsible.", ">>{Brady_55} : People who care about policy are cringing Who? Who is? I'd love to know who. What bush is doing is choosing Country over party. Bush senior is THE most popular president alive, and he is voting for Hillary not because her policies align with his, but because Trump is a piece of shit of a candidate. So please, you still haven't answered what exact policies have moved the democrats to the right. Still waiting.", '>>{Binion206} : Progressives. Bush senior is an asshat. He is voting out of fear like a coward. Clinton is a piece of shit candidate too. Look into US foreign policy for the last 8 years, you might find some clues there.', ">>{Windstorm2002} : I can only see them in certain conditions, and it's not like I can see each light, I can just see the squares. If you wanna see pixels try looking at a TV close.", '>>{Brady_55} : Still haven\'t answered my question. What makes the democrats "to the right"? My third time asking lmao', ">>{Brady_55} : What foreign policies? (You have no idea what you're talking about hahah)", '>>{BrianMcKinnon} : 2K is 1080p. Not sure if I misread your comment or you just typoed.', ">>{Shilo788} : Flynn stated his firm did cyber security, plane logistics. I thought that was interesting considering the Russian oligarch's plane meeting up with Trumps plane on different sometimes tiny airports during the campaign.", ">>{Binion206} : Drone program? Libya? Gitmo? Familiar with those? Aside from foreign policy, the Democratic Party's treatment of whistleblowers is straight up embarrassing. Something you'd expect a republican cabinet to approve.", '>>{PainForYearsAndYears} : The thing is, this administration was asked whether they would do that and they said that they would not, and instead things were going to be done "in an orderly and organized manner". It isn\'t that they did this, it was that they did it after they said they would not. So, WHY did they change their minds?', '>>{Brady_55} : Wait, you think being hawkish is a republican thing? Oh sweet summer child. The reason we have drones is because the democratic president doesn\'t want boots on the ground. Obama did not want to intervene in Libya, and he is actively trying to close down gitmo before his term is up. You\'re grasping at straws because you made a dumb argument. Here\'s the simple fact, the Democratic Party\'s policies are the most "left" or as I like to call it, progressive, that they have ever been. George Bush just really hate trump. Just admit when you lost and move on.', '>>{tau-lepton} : Is "White Castle franchise owner" a euphemism for an SPLC or ACLU lawyer?', ">>{Brady_55} : Just admit when you lost. You're in over your head", ">>{onatiko} : 2K is 2560x1440 and 4K is 3840x2160 isn't it?", '>>{BrianMcKinnon} : Google is your friend, but no. 4K refers to the horizontal resolution being on the order of 4000 pixels. 2K means on the order of 2000 pixels. 2560x1440 would be 2.5K.', '>>{onatiko} : Sorry, I thought it that way. Everybody is referring 2560x1440 as 2K.', '>>{BrianMcKinnon} : I know. I try to correct them but I just get downvoted every time. People hate being wrong :/', '>>{onatiko} : I looked into that from wikipedia some time ago that is why I believe you. But sure, people never love being wrong.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{Quinnjester} : Christ sake this woman is on a roll lately...', ">>{lombar77} : Synopsis: *Rachel Maddow reports on the sudden, unexpected purge of 46 U.S. attorneys from the Justice Department, including Preet Bharara, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, who has been asked personally by Donald Trump to stay on.* Timing sure seems fishy especially with everything else Maddow has been reporting on. Ties into her first segment of the night that's already been posted. /Edit. See this post http://reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5yqt7n/maddow_pence_story_on_flynn_impossible_to_believe/ by /u/WmPitcher.", '>>{BoredPork} : Questions like: who has the pee tape and when are we going to see it, and wtf is wrong these people defending Trump.😂', '>>{lombar77} : Hell yes she has. Hoping she puts a synopsis together of all for us next week or the week after. Would love to see half her show dedicated to cliffs notes version.', ">>{carbs90} : But they AGs usually leave when administration's transition over? Just playing devil's advocate here, but explain how process is different than ones that preceded it?", '>>{graay_ghost} : They leave when their replacement is ready generally. In this case, there is none.', ">>{lombar77} : Quite often yes but it's usally quite orderly and in fact they agreed to an orderly replacement of these attorneys early in the year. Only thing fairy comparable was Reno in 93 and even that was less purge like. If you haven't seen her report yet I'd suggest taking a peak. Only like 7 minutes. And the first segment of the night is well worth a watch first.", '>>{tau-lepton} : Gee, I wonder what 46 highly talented lawyers who understand the vulnerabilities of the Justice Department are going to do for a living.', '>>{lombar77} : Oh and apparently Hannity was railing last night about how Trump needs to get rid of Obama people on his show last night and specifically brought up what Reno did in 93. Wonder where this magnificent and ass saving idea came from?', '>>{SaxonPimp} : It is precisely this type of unmitigated alarmist horse-pucky that erodes confidence in the media. EVERY incoming administration purges the opposition attorneys. Obama did it, Bush did it, Clinton did it. But now that TRUMP is doing it AHHHhhhhh!!!', ">>{bongggblue} : Nah, it's usually been done in a professional manner with regards to the work those offices do, and usually allow the previous person to stay on til their replacement is named, as to not disrupt current ongoing investigations and open cases. Clinton did it with Janet Reno in 93, but they did it in a more organized manner, not less than a day's notice, but can't expect this administration to behave like adults and give common professional courtesy. At least this will get the news cycle off Jeff Sessions and Flynn's bullshit for the weekend, and disrupt any ongoing investigations on the Trump campaign for a few days.", '>>{Axewhipe} : Thanks. (Posted so I can see later)', '>>{TheRusCIAn} : [President Bill Clinton, summarily fired all 93 U.S. Attorneys on a single day, March 23, 1993.](http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1817411/posts)', '>>{loungeboy79} : And the only way that trump can beat this record is to hire lawyers and then fire them for failing to protect him.', '>>{Quinnjester} : Nah the Jeff stuff is still strong. And the media is more worried about stone.', '>>{milosreturn} : This sham of a presidency is falling apart at the seams and he knows it', ">>{Rezrov_} : They're replaced once their replacement has been confirmed or at least nominated. They don't usually just leave a massive hole of vacant positions.", '>>{Y0upi} : No. Not quite often. It has happened. It is not regular or often.', ">>{lombar77} : Apparently it is fairly common when there is a partisan change of the presidency. It's just not commonly done this one was.", '>>{pushpin} : I can see it now. The HBO miniseries will open with Wiener sexting his junk and the final scene Trump will be watching some golden showers. Or prison could work, too.', '>>{peepeepresident} : Another warning sign of impending dictatorship: dismissing people loyal to institutions. It was done at the state department and is now happening at the justice department. This is a purge.', ">>{FireNexus} : Not really. She's Fox Newsing at least this one story. Asking for the resignations of political appointees so you can fill the positions is ordinary.", ">>{vanker} : I believe typically they don't do that until they have somebody ready to fill that position, and that's not the case here.", ">>{badfordabidness} : I believe asking someone to resign is a pretty weird thing to do after you made a big show of inviting them to your private residence and asking them to stay on mere months ago. Preet Bharara has been pretty fearless in going after Wall Street types (grading on a curve here). He's also been tenacious about going after corrupt politicians. Almost every corrupt politician in his jurisdiction (Manhattan) is a Democrat. Trump and his base have almost every reason to love a Democrat who takes down corrupt Democrats. The *one* reason they have not to? Well, that would be Mr. Bharara's ability to investigate the single major Republican politician whose private residence and corporate interests DO fall within his jurisdiction.", ">>{NickVanExellence} : They haven't even filled the current vacancies. This is highly unusual and irresponsible.", ">>{Shilo788} : Flynn stated his firm did cyber security, plane logistics. I thought that was interesting considering the Russian oligarch's plane meeting up with Trumps plane on different sometimes tiny airports during the campaign.", '>>{PainForYearsAndYears} : The thing is, this administration was asked whether they would do that and they said that they would not, and instead things were going to be done "in an orderly and organized manner". It isn\'t that they did this, it was that they did it after they said they would not. So, WHY did they change their minds?', '>>{tau-lepton} : Is "White Castle franchise owner" a euphemism for an SPLC or ACLU lawyer?'], [">>{readerseven} : Why It's Possible George H.W. Bush Could Vote for Clinton", '>>{dyzo-blue} : Let me guess: like the rest of us, he has realized that Trump is a vile racist ignorant clown Bush is a decent man, and decent men do not vote for racist pieces of shit.', '>>{24Willard} : Also trump asteroid smashed the family name by reducing jeb to please clap. Bushes gotta be salty', '>>{IvankaDrumpf} : Watching his son get verbally raped on stage repeatedly might have had something to do with it.', '>>{BerningSandals} : Exactly! No Bush is going to vote for Trump *ever*.', ">>{gnarlygod} : It isn't possible, it is a certainty. Bush is voting for Clinton, he said so on CNN today.", '>>{rwilso7} : You had to be alive then to know this, but H.W Bush was as much reviled and lampooned as Trump is today. Neil Young wrote a song basically calling him a murder, Hollywood celebrities said they were moving to Canada, and when Bush got sick on camera he was laughed at in a way Hillary is protected from. Liberals always say the Republican is the devil, so who cares?', '>>{FAT_ORANGE_DRUMPF} : Hillary is gonna win anyway. Might as well be on the right side of history and avoid being lumped in with the deplorables.', ">>{escalation} : Two reasons. They've basically both been playing on team Neo-Oligarch for a long time. The other reason is that Trump humiliated Jeb big time, so it's kinda personal at this point.", '>>{RobeFlax} : Was alive. He was much more capable and competent as a leader than Trump.', '>>{Binion206} : A perfect example of how the "Democratic" party has shifted to the right.', '>>{Brady_55} : And how does him voting for her mean the democrats have shifted to the right?', ">>{Brady_55} : Yup. Let's hear it. How does this mean they moved to the right? I'm alll ears.", ">>{ilikeyoohoo} : This isn't remotely true. Sure, of course liberals didn't like H.W. Bush. But, he isn't comparable to Trump whatsoever. And, obviously, people made a joke of his vomiting on camera. That would happen to any politician. Edit: I don't see how Hillary is protected from people making fun of her. Especially in the age of internet and memes.", ">>{Binion206} : You know something is wrong with your candidate if Bush supports her. People who care about policy are cringing at this news. What's the point of the Democratic Party if you rejoice when you get the support from the leader of the opposing party.", ">>{Brady_55} : People who care about policy are cringing Who? Who is? I'd love to know who. What bush is doing is choosing Country over party. Bush senior is THE most popular president alive, and he is voting for Hillary not because her policies align with his, but because Trump is a piece of shit of a candidate. So please, you still haven't answered what exact policies have moved the democrats to the right. Still waiting.", '>>{Binion206} : Progressives. Bush senior is an asshat. He is voting out of fear like a coward. Clinton is a piece of shit candidate too. Look into US foreign policy for the last 8 years, you might find some clues there.', '>>{Brady_55} : Still haven\'t answered my question. What makes the democrats "to the right"? My third time asking lmao', ">>{Brady_55} : What foreign policies? (You have no idea what you're talking about hahah)", ">>{Binion206} : Drone program? Libya? Gitmo? Familiar with those? Aside from foreign policy, the Democratic Party's treatment of whistleblowers is straight up embarrassing. Something you'd expect a republican cabinet to approve.", '>>{Brady_55} : Wait, you think being hawkish is a republican thing? Oh sweet summer child. The reason we have drones is because the democratic president doesn\'t want boots on the ground. Obama did not want to intervene in Libya, and he is actively trying to close down gitmo before his term is up. You\'re grasping at straws because you made a dumb argument. Here\'s the simple fact, the Democratic Party\'s policies are the most "left" or as I like to call it, progressive, that they have ever been. George Bush just really hate trump. Just admit when you lost and move on.', ">>{Brady_55} : Just admit when you lost. You're in over your head"], ['>>{sloppyFarts} : The bright part is actually the line of a letter. If I have more time at work I will make more photos, possible to 100x.', '>>{elduderino1234} : Can somebody zoom in 10x on the bright part of this picture under a microscope on their iPhone?', '>>{jared_number_two} : And post a photo showing how you took the picture.', ">>{tobsn} : in doing DMLS right now and it's printing at 0.016mm makes it all the sudden even more impressive...", '>>{ZaphodBoone} : Reminds me when I was a kid and looking straight into the soul of our good old cathode ray tube color TV by standing 2 inches from the screen.', ">>{svn} : Try not to have so much fun or you'll pee yourself", ">>{Mykem} : From Anandtech's analysis of the display on the iPhone 6 which is very much similar to that of the iPhone 6s and 7 especially when it comes to the use of dual domain pixels (which is why the pixels are chevron-shaped): http://i.imgur.com/TfkFyPO.jpg http://www.anandtech.com/show/8554/the-iphone-6-review/8", ">>{Windstorm2002} : I used to be able to see individual pixels by looking closely, now on my 1080p iPhone 7 plus I can barely see pixels any more, I can't imagine when we get 4k phones", '>>{CoffeeLinuxWeights} : 4k phones exist, if you know what I mean.', ">>{sloppyFarts} : Sorry I don't remember... Forgot to say that this was taken in landscape.", '>>{Xelphif} : And then a picture of how you took the picture of you taking first picture.', '>>{burritocmdr} : Be sure to use this image for your analysis, so I can see pixels of pixels, on my pixel display', '>>{Rellek_} : instructions unclear. just peed on my cat, who is named Pixel. Edit: fun was still had, just not as intended.', ">>{AlexTraner} : Your eyesight is better than mine. When. I go to the eye doctor I'm going to say that I want to be able to see the pixels on my phone!", '>>{TwoOhEight} : Let the game of Hangman commence. Is it the letter t?', '>>{avEmonsta} : So this means that the display is highly accurate?', '>>{onatiko} : 2K phones are real and its 2x more pixels. If that iPhone display amazes you, you should try a GS7', ">>{Windstorm2002} : I can only see them in certain conditions, and it's not like I can see each light, I can just see the squares. If you wanna see pixels try looking at a TV close.", '>>{BrianMcKinnon} : 2K is 1080p. Not sure if I misread your comment or you just typoed.', ">>{onatiko} : 2K is 2560x1440 and 4K is 3840x2160 isn't it?", '>>{BrianMcKinnon} : Google is your friend, but no. 4K refers to the horizontal resolution being on the order of 4000 pixels. 2K means on the order of 2000 pixels. 2560x1440 would be 2.5K.', '>>{onatiko} : Sorry, I thought it that way. Everybody is referring 2560x1440 as 2K.', '>>{BrianMcKinnon} : I know. I try to correct them but I just get downvoted every time. People hate being wrong :/', '>>{onatiko} : I looked into that from wikipedia some time ago that is why I believe you. But sure, people never love being wrong.'], ['>>{cookiemonster777} : this is like magazine cover worthy! An absolutely beautiful photo', ">>{iAmRadic} : Can we stop the 7 Plus photos already? We get it, it's good, but there's a reason we have rules in here. Read them.", '>>{twojimbean} : Yea. I was thinking that as I posted it but said screw it.', '>>{twojimbean} : Jesus! Who s#%t in your cereal.', ">>{iAmRadic} : Do you say that every time someone tells you you're breaking the rules?", ">>{UnaClocker} : 7p? Gag. There's this symbol in your keyboard that is short for Plus. It looks like this: +", ">>{twojimbean} : Nope. I just figured it was a cool picture and simply wanted to share it. Didn't realize I'd ruin people's days over.", '>>{twojimbean} : Man, you guys are brutal in here. Smh but thanks for that buddy. Lol', ">>{iAmRadic} : > Rules > > Image posts with iPhone photography will be removed. Try /r/iPhonePictures, /r/iphoneography, or /r/itookapicture. All i'm saying, is you can just go ahead and put this where it belongs.", ">>{sneakpeekbot} : **Here's a sneak peek of /r/iphonepictures using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/iphonepictures/top/?sort=top&t=year) of the year!** \\#1: [Everything Need Know iPhone 7 Price,Release Date,Features](http://www.telecominfo.org/everything-need-know-iphone-7-pricerelease-datefeatures/) | [0 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/iphonepictures/comments/4wm9dm/everything_need_know_iphone_7_pricerelease/) \\#2: [I was told y'all might like these bee pics, shot with my 7+](http://imgur.com/a/buQF9) | [6 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/iphonepictures/comments/5bmyh9/i_was_told_yall_might_like_these_bee_pics_shot/) \\#3: [Rejected 'Shot on iPhone' Commercial](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGlDsQRUQXA) | [0 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/iphonepictures/comments/55bj7b/rejected_shot_on_iphone_commercial/) ---- ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| [^^Contact ^^me](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| [^^Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| [^^Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/5lveo6/blacklist/)", ">>{ceslek} : Probably because people (volunteers) don't spend their entire days modding subreddits.", '>>{Narkova} : Why do I need to "get a life" if all I asked was a question? I think you\'re the one who needs a life 😉', ">>{cookiemonster777} : that's why he got down voted. some people can be petty. dw about it. 7p, 7+, whatever. he missed the point clearly :P"], ['>>{Donald_Fanz} : Trump Tweets his anger that Kellyanne Conway interview cut short', ">>{todayilearned83} : Oh look, another shit spam site that the broken automod won't pick up.", ">>{Jaxx_Teller} : Well whenever Ms. Conway goes to speak on CBS they constantly are interrupting her the entire time. She starts saying something, and half way through her sentence they start patronizing her, forcing her to explain what she was originally trying to explain in the first place. It's fucking mind-boggling to watch - my whole family watches it for the mere reason to see how much Charlie and the others start going off on their own tangents instead of letting Ms. Conway explain herself. It's laughable, my parents are very confused as to why they do this.\u202d", ">>{grin_and_bexar_it} : Wahhh why won't journalists let her go on there and spew lies without interruption?", ">>{amiiboness6} : If you can watch Kelly Anne Conway during an interview and not recognize she's full of lies/spin then you need some lessons in some critical thinking or I have a house to sell you.", ">>{Jaxx_Teller} : If she's going to spew lies, at least let her do that then so we can call her bluff. They don't even let her do that. No details of Trump's actions can be summarized from her interview despite her trying to articulate what is going on because she is shut down half-way through every response she gives.", ">>{joepo32} : Because every response she gives are lies and nonsense. They interrupt her because if they don't she will just talk about nothing and continue to deflect the entire time.", ">>{Jaxx_Teller} : How can you come to that conclusion, when she isn't even allowed to lie if she wanted to? You cannot summarize anything from her interviews because she is interrupted half-way through everything she responds with, regardless of the content. The interviewers just go off on their own tangents. They don't let her lie even if that was her intention. If she's going to lie, at least let her do that so we can call her bluff, but to come to the conclusion that all she does is lie would be incorrect because she's never even been able to finish a sentence in her response to questions.", ">>{Jaxx_Teller} : Or, if they don't interrupt her, **she will respond to the literal question at hand.** Instead, I watch her get interviewed by CBS and not only have I wasted my time, but my IQ has dropped around 10 points and I start to question my entire reality as I watch someone who is supposed to give information about what is happening with Trump and the White House, and all I am able to salvage is that the interviewers are trying to belittle and bully this woman for reasons beyond my comprehension. I want to actually hear what the hell is going on, I don't care about the opinions of the newscasters. People want to actually hear what she has to say, regardless of whether you hate her guts or not. Except for you, it seems you would rather live in an echo chamber like r/politics.", ">>{joepo32} : >Or, if they don't interrupt her, she will respond to the literal question at hand. When has she ever actually answered the question at hand? If you are waiting for that to happen and think it is because journalist don't let her ramble about nothing for the allotted time to avoid giving real answers then you are greatly mistaken and will be waiting a very long time. >I want to actually hear what the hell is going on, I don't care about the opinions of the newscasters. When she speaks she isn't going to say what is actually going on. It has never been a campaign strategy. Nor will that be a policy during his presidency. She is simply there to spout nonsense and lie to keep people distracted. She is only there to tell people what they think those people want to hear. >People want to actually hear what she has to say Then she should actually answer questions. Instead she rambles on about issue not being asked about. Then journalist have to interrupt her and try to get her back to the question. Then she rambles more and people like you complain they don't let her talk. They shouldn't be letting her talk about what ever she wishes. She should be answering the questions they ask. It is there job to interrupt her and try to keep her on topic and check her honesty."]]

classify and reply

['>>{sglville} : Leave it on the charger for a few days and you might get lucky.', ">>{Singlemalt_28} : Obama suggests sexism could be hurting Clinton's White House bid", '>>{LostAccountant} : Amusing the prisonplanet people being so strongly pro-russian useful idiots that they already drop off the trumptrain after just 1 strike in response to a **frakking chemical attack**', '>>{wonderingsocrates} : How the prosperity gospel explains Donald Trump’s popularity with Christian voters', ">>{gaffeyManzZ} : Take it to a 3rd party shop and just see if a new battery turns it on. I work in a repair shop and we've had a couple people in your exact situation", '>>{Wolf-Head} : If you thought voting Republican meant no war you were fooling yourself.', '>>{StupidRuralAmerican} : *We Christians need to spread love, by hating and vilifying the poor and immigrants.*', ">>{TrumpGal} : Well, this should be a refreshing change from the argument that anyone voting for Hillary's opponent is just racist.", ">>{wonderingsocrates} : i was just doing some research on trying to figure out why christians would vote for trump and came across this july piece. it helps explain why christians would vote for him: if you are rich, then god must be blessing you, as he did to to various leaders in the old testament. it's a distorted view of the christianity, but it does help explain why 4 out of 5 evangelicals voted for trump.", '>>{MysticRay} : True but it would have happened [either way](http://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-hillary-clinton-idUSKBN179058).', '>>{TumNarDok} : > Glad our arrogant Pres. is enjoying his taxpayer funded golf outing after announcing the US should take military action against Syria — Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) September 4, 2013 rofl', ">>{mafuuuba} : Lemme get this straight. Trump signs away their privacy... not a pip from the Trumpters. Trump tries to get rid of their healthcare, same. Just making America Great again is all. Trump bombs Syria... all of a sudden they don't like him anymore. Don't get me wrong, I don't like that this is happening either but that's some fucked up priorities there.", '>>{AndrewRyansRapture} : Just go watch Jim Bakker to understand...I mean not understand at all. Seriously, I have nothing in common with many Americans. Who would pay hacks like that for anything?! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnaSvvSqY-8', ">>{oahut} : 34% approval and dropping. Let's see how much support Trump has by Monday.", ">>{georgiapeanuts} : I'm so sick of the Clinton Campaign making everything about sexism, I'm sick of it.", '>>{Fun_For_Guill} : When the words of your holy texts can be reinterpreted in order to justify your immoral behaviour your holy texts are worthless. I see no difference between Islamic extremists using a very loose interpretation of the Koran to justify murder and the Christian evangelicals of America using a very loose interpretation of the bible to justify their hoarding of wealth at the expense of the poor. Jesus after all was an Arabic socialist Jew whose world view is incompatible with capitalism. And god is not some simple genie granting wishes of wealth and fortune on those that pray the hardest.', '>>{OldMutant} : You can\'t read the article without signing up so I\'ll just have to guess what the writer says from the tile. If the article writer thinks the "prosperity gospel" had anything to do with Christians voting Trump the article writer is a clueless idiot. Christians voted Trump because Supreme Court primarily. The demoncrat party has been steadily infringing on the religious luberty the Constitution guarantees and we need to see that changed. Thus Trump.', ">>{thefuckingswampking} : Mine just died as well. I spilled a glass of water on it and couldn't save it in time. Luckily this was a couple days ago, and I'm good for an upgrade on Friday. In all of my years in phones, this is the first one I've ever fucked up though. So I'm proud of that lol I feel ya on all the lost data. Fuckin sucks man :(", '>>{TumNarDok} : it is all about how currently visible things are. privacy and healthcare you will only notice the impact in a year or so, the pictures of war are readily availbable. sheeples live in the here and now.', ">>{lovely_sombrero} : Weren't Clinton supporters also accusing him and his supporters of being sexist in 2008 primary? Just found out I've been sexist for 8+ years now.", ">>{TheBrainwasher14} : You've just inspired me to start backing up my iPhone 6 again. It's even older than yours", ">>{UvonTheTerrible} : Of course. If you're a man and you are not voting for Clinton then you're sexist by default.", '>>{mrbarky} : Oh bullshit. Joel Osteen, Paula White, and all the crew at Trinity Broadcasting push that shit. There may be minority adherents, but it is rooted in white Pentecostal traditions.', ">>{PointNShooty} : I know why Christians voted for him: he bothered to talk to them. Where was Hillary's Christian outreach?", ">>{nvs1980} : Of course it is... just like racism prevented Obama from getting elected... oh wait. If not for Trump, Clinton would be the most disliked and untrusted person to ever run for office. Not because she's female, but because she's untrustworthy and unlikeable.", '>>{wonderingsocrates} : yeah, there is a long tradition, e. w. kenyon and “new thought” preachers like norman vincent peale after ww2, arguing wealth is actually a sign from god. plus for those that remember jim bakker, he was, along with peter popoff, in the same circle.', '>>{Artful_Dodger_42} : So...if God gives wealth to the most Christian people, then Jesus must have been a dirty, penniless, sinner. /s', '>>{SlicedDicedBeef} : Anything except her policies, corruption, and health.', '>>{ras344} : Sure, it has nothing to do with her just being a terrible candidate.', '>>{Stoga} : > but it is rooted in white Pentecostal traditions. And goes against everything Christ preached about the dangers of mammon worship.', '>>{sapplylapply} : Unfortunately this military action might stop that drop. Americans love a strong leader. It might hurt Trump with some of his hardcore base, but help with the rest of the US.', '>>{Stoga} : And quite a few Christians did NOT vote for Trump, as evidenced by the lead in vote count by Hillary Clinton.', ">>{sedgwickian} : A helpful note for the easily offended male participants in this thread: It is possible for sexism to be a factor in Clinton's white house bid without it being the root and sole cause of every negative element of he campaign.", ">>{sapplylapply} : I mean they would be the biggest hypocrites if not. They cried for months that Hillary's proposed action will lead to WW3. This only shows that they genuinely believed the lies they spreaded. On the other hand it won't take long for them to come around. What are they gonna do? Admit they were wrong? Never.", '>>{Sam_Munhi} : They are officially in hail mary mode as a campaign. Do they actually think this is going to work?', '>>{TheCaptainDamnIt} : My personal thoughts are that in the U.S. a lot of christianity IS a political/economic system much more than it\'s a \'biblical\' religion. This is why there are so many things that you must also follow to be a \'true christian\' that have noting to do with (or in many cases are contrary) to what\'s in the bible. From hating gays, to loving unrestricted access to guns, to trickle down economics, to hating immigrates, to foreign policy, to blaming \'hollywood\', to watching FOX news, to fearing black people, to driving large vehicles and loving country music (for some reason). All these things political things are now just part of the christian religion for many. And It\'s why so many rants by religious figures contain off the track attacks on "liberals". Trump ticks a lot of those boxes. But it started with those awful calvinist/puritans that first started the belief (in the U.S.) in predestination, believing that god shows who his favored people are by bestowing wealth on them. From the beginning much of U.S. christianity has looked upon the rich as being inherently better people in all regards by the very nature of them being rich. A wealthy man to an american christian must have been ‘blessed’ by god, and to be blessed one must be ‘morally supers’ by definition. Of course the opposite then becomes that for this version of christianity the poor then by definition are ‘morally corrupt’ ‘lazy’ and ‘cursed by god’. Everyone gets what they deserve according to these people, and no amount of ‘work’ or ‘moral restraint’ done by the individual actually matters, it’s all about the economic outcome that tells them how to judge the character of a person (and why black people where viewed as cursed because they where slaves, if god had loved them, he wouldn’t have made them slaves). Now take this already disgusting theology and add in the “Red Scare” and cold war attempts to wrap the U.S. flag around the cross and you get where we are today. A christianity that claims to worship christ, but actually worships the wealthy. A christianity that claims to follow the teachings of christ, but loathes, hates, and blames the ‘cursed’ poor. A christianity that is more about following ‘the market’ than about their ‘god’. They have become more a religon of Ayn Rand than Jesus. When viewed through this lenses the Creflo Dollar’s not only make perfect sense, but are a logical conclusion of U.S. christianity. It explains why we don\'t have universal healthcare (if god wanted to help those poor people he would make them rich enough to afford to see the doctor) It explains so many things non-americans find contradictory about us. It explains the (now growing) backlash to Pope Francis (who preaches the exact opposite). It explains my favorite contradiction, that those christians here who refuse to accept evolution as true, are often the biggest proponents of social Darwinistic economics(the social darwinistic language that comes out of Christianity today is astounding). Hell it even explains Donald Trump (may christians look at his wealth as making him right, a \'winner\' with gods \'blessings\')! I sometimes wonder if U.S. christians will ever wake up to what they have become, but since these beliefs have become so prevalent here that even non-christians are wrapped up in them I fear we’re just screwed as a society and it all started at the beginning.', ">>{TannerHill} : I used this place for recovering data off my mothers iPhone 6 Plus after the phone was bent. Please have yourself a look, it's not cheap but if your data is important to you, here's the premium quality service to use (Jessa will help you out) http://www.mendonipadrehab.com", ">>{getridofappleskitle} : just keep distancing yourself guys, it's working great so far! /s", ">>{balmergrl} : My new favorite is an old favorite Jim Bakker, at first I thought it was a Christopher Guest skit or some kind of joke they are so wacky - and I didn't recognize Jim with the facial hair he now sports and his current show is a big step down from PTL heydays. When Jim got indicted on fraud and conspiracy in the late 80's and sentenced to 45 years, I remember our housekeeper told me that it was a shame because he saved a lot of people with his ministry. I think they appeal to certain socioeconomic demographics, all money is green.", ">>{Zengru} : My girlfriend's iPhone 6 was starting to die, fingerprint reader wasn't reading, having weird glitches, being slower than it used to be, etc., so we decided to upgrade hers to an iPhone 7 Plus for me and she'd get my 6S, because I was craving a larger screen and she wanted a smaller one, but one that actually works. Newer iPhones really don't last all that long unfortunately. 2 years tops it seems. Assuming you have Wifi at home, make sure the auto iCloud backup is on, and backup manually to a computer with iTunes every week or so, depending on how much you change things. Cause losing all that stuff sucks.", '>>{FattestRabbit} : Yeah, except Hillary made her intentions clear from the get-go and Trump ran on *not being Hillary*.', '>>{AdoptMeBrangelina} : Please tell me there are bots flooding his twitter feed with this?', ">>{Muppet1616} : The gas attack during Obama's presidency caused 10x more casualties (1500 people died). The pro-Russian usefull idiots (which included trump) were vehemetely opposed to intervention then as well. And honestly I agree, bombing the shit out of a country is pretty easy for the US, however there is no gurantee what so ever that the lives of the people living in the country improve in subsequent years (just look at Iraq and Afghanistan).", '>>{kyonu} : Yes, of course. Sexism. Not her lying. Not her scandals. Not her health. Not her lack of transparency. Not her lack of policy. Not her lack of activism. Just sexism.', '>>{dalovindj} : Good luck with that strategy. Worked out great for the new Ghostbusters.', ">>{Wolf-Head} : Because it's a talking point. We don't even know if this would have happened if Clinton won. Assad clearly thought he could get away with this with Trump in office. And even if it did there'd be a more considered process than launching missile before we even talked to our allies, or congress.", ">>{TheBrainwasher14} : > we decided to upgrade hers to an iPhone 7 Plus for me and she'd get my 6S Lol wut", '>>{Zengru} : She used her upgrade for the 7 Plus and we swapped phones. Just a simple reset, restore, sim swap.', '>>{bijan4187} : Like clockwork the sexism angle is played by the clintons. Just like she tried with obama and sanders. The woman who cried wolf. Lets forget her own racist and sexist antics towards obama in 2008 and slut shaming any woman ever that accused bill of anything. Shes shameless.', ">>{A_ducks_nipples} : no it would happen in different ways. for example. trump administration does not even have assistant secretary of state or assistant secretary of defense. half the offices in the pentagon are empty and same at the state department. this kind of incompetence is unthinkable in any other presidency. another difference is how often trump tweets about shit he has no business tweeting about. imagine if there was an armed confrontation between us and russian soldiers the last thing we need is for trump raging like a 10 year old on twitter. especially when the professionals that are supposed to handle situations like those are not appointed or not qualified enough to be confirmed finally, and probably most dangerous is donald trump's lack of credibility. this is the guy that sends his people out to talk about obama wiretapping, bowling green massacre, etc. trump hangs out with people like alex jones, ben carson, etc. trump and his associates are under investigation for collusion with russia. all these factors combine to make everyone unsure whether to take what he says seriously.", '>>{Viat0r} : Calvinism is a very influential school of thought within the protestant tradition.', ">>{TheAmazingAsshole2} : There's more people voting for Clinton because she's a woman than people not voting for her for it.", '>>{Heirsandgraces} : I think though that HRC would have had all the intelligence reports ready, a full knowledgeable compliment of staff at the Pentagon, a Secretary of State more attuned to the history and any new shifts in intelligence with the Syrian Government and would have exhausted all other options before giving the order, rather than triggering her with a picture of a beautiful baby.', ">>{x3n0n1c} : There still tons of iphone 5, 5s, and 6s out there. Some people get unlucky but it doesn't mean they all will die. I manage the phones here at my company and in the 2 years since its release I've had exactly 1 iPhone 6 come back due to non-damage related failure, and that was due to a faulty battery which apple replaced free. I suppose we have been lucky with the touch IC death though, hear a lot about that.", '>>{SunriseSurprise} : Or it could be shit [like this](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/53id42/hillarys_it_guy_reportedly_tried_to_remove_sender/).', ">>{nvs1980} : You wouldn't know that given the rhetoric that has come out of her campaign.", ">>{MysticRay} : >Because it's a talking point. It's a logical response to your own talking point. >Assad clearly thought he could get away with this with Trump in office. He must have felt the same about Obama. Clinton wanted to fight Assad [then](https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/04/world/syria-exposes-split-between-obama-and-clinton.html), too. >And even if it did there'd be a more considered process And how would the outcome have been different?", '>>{balmergrl} : Did you see the one where they are begging for people to join the $100/month "President Club" because they were so busy praying for Donald that they forgot to raise money? The mental gymnastics to be both doomsday and prosperity... My husband called to inquire about the buckets of dehydrated food Bakker and team now hawk, if we still need to invest in them even though Donald has been prayed into office. I can\'t stop him from trolling those poor operators, cheap kicks lol.', ">>{Wolf-Head} : Well considering one of my point is this may not have happened, those kids wouldn't have been gassed. Hell they may have been here since Clinton wouldn't be trying to ban them in the first place.", '>>{PointNShooty} : >if they were prone to reaching out to, LOL are you seriously suggesting that it\'s not the job of the candidate to reach out to as many voters as possible? Christianity is the most popular religion in the country, how many churches did Clinton give speeches in? I know plenty of pro choice Christians. Saying that Clinton was correct in ignoring the Christian vote because it "kills the conversation" is ridiculous. There was no conversation to kill, Clinton didn\'t even attempt to appeal to that demographic.', ">>{OnlyFactsMatter} : Anyone notice the first female Presidential candidate doesn't have the excitement that the first black President did? Want to know why? Clinton is a terrible candidate. 2008 was perfect for Obama: - Coming off Bush's awful Presidency. People wanted change and Obama nailed it flawlessly - Obama was only half black. Could a Ben Carson or Alan Keyes be the first black President? Probably not, so Obama being only half-white helped a lot - He was a great Orator and inspired many people - He was young. At 47 he is one of the 5 youngest Presidents ever etc. etc. Basically, it was the perfect storm. Clinton could have probably brought that excitement in 2008, but now it seems like her time has passed and she is just trying to FORCE hype, rather than let it develop naturally like with Obama.", ">>{Zengru} : It just seems like there's more 3G/3GS/4/4S out there running strong than 5S or 6. It's like instead of making phones that people will be able to carry for 7 years, Apple is designing the internals to not last as long and start dying out around that 2 year contract point, so people are forced to upgrade. Planned obsolescence and all that. I've seen more 3G and 4 out and about than 5. But maybe that's just because I live in a town of old people.", ">>{x3n0n1c} : I live in downtown Toronto and take the packed subway to and from work everyday, and I see mostly 5/5S/6/6S phones. 5 and 5S's are easy to spot by checking if there is TouchId, though the SE lines in a case are a crapshoot for figuring out if its a 5S or not, unless its rose gold. The 5 line (or maybe SE) I see all the time. Tons still have em. I don't see 4 or 4s that often, and can't remember the last time I saw someone using anything lower than that.", ">>{wonderingsocrates} : i didn't say she ignored the christian vote. i said she ignored the conservative/fundamentalist christian vote (that's what we are discussing here- conservative evangelicals). she didn't speak, like sanders, at liberty baptist univ., she always, to my knowledge, speaks at churches that welcome her and are democratic thru and thru, not republican and socially conservative in policy.", ">>{MysticRay} : Assad escalated attacks on his people years ago. Your theory isn't based on anything.", ">>{Zengru} : Yeah it's probably just the area I live in then. It's basically a rich retirement town and they don't seem to like to get rid of stuff if what they have works. And all they need is to be able to call their grandkids and maybe check Facebook every once in a while.", '>>{bijan4187} : While calling his fans "obama boys". Word of advice to white people, dont use the term boy towards a black man ever.', '>>{Shilalasar} : I´ll give you a few hints: Visiblity is everything for them. They believe and care about what they see and what they see the most. Healthcare, covered as good if gone, so they did not care. Privacy, covered by american internetfans, but not "their media", so they cared a bit. Bombs on Syria, covered by their media and russian bots, trolls and paid shills. Lots of noise so they care about it a lot', '>>{RoastedWithHoney} : Blaming Trump for the privacy law is not entirely accurate and I would argue you are misrepresenting the debate over the affordable healthcare act, which a lot of Trump supporters did not support the replacement. The Syria thing is because many Trump supporters do not want the US intervening in foreign wars, or engaging in regime change. You are obviously over simplifying the issues and misrepresenting Trump supporters.', '>>{LostAccountant} : There is full scale intervention and there is a retaliatory strike. The thing with chemical attacks is that they are banned, as such when they are used, such behaviour should be punished, otherwise armies will simply keep using them without consequence. Bombing the airfield from which the strike took place is then proportional.', ">>{political-hack} : It's based on the fact that Rex decoded that we should support the Assad regime or at least stay or of the conflict. Basically condoning the behaviour by condoning the person.", '>>{sedgwickian} : TIL "sexism could be hurting Clinton\'s bid" == "Sexism is the only thing hurting Clinton\'s bid."', ">>{MysticRay} : There's no reason to think that Assad would have refrained from the attack if Clinton were in office.", '>>{MonsieurIneos} : Maybe.. just maybe at first. However since then she has given people plenty, and I mean PLENTY of other reasons to not like her. Being a women is either not on the list, or is at the bottom of the list of reasons not to vote for her. Though Trump has a giant list of reasons not to vote for him either. This election is annoying.', ">>{VeryVito} : With a divided Congress, anything that becomes law today rests squarely on Trump's slumping shoulders. He could veto anything coming out of Congress, and it would be gone forever. No way this wrecking crew is overturning a veto today. He won't do this, of course, because he is aware that his term in office is contingent on whether Republicans still put up with his incompetence. As soon as they decide he's no longer useful to them, he's out.", '>>{political-hack} : Except the secretary of state condoning the leadership of the guy who already used chemical weapons. Do not fucking tell me that a Clinton Sec of State would do the fucking same.', '>>{MysticRay} : Exactly. Obama condoned the continued leadership of the guy who already used chemical weapons and Clinton wanted to overthrow him.', ">>{political-hack} : Obama did everything to hurt Assad short of declaring war. Trump's sec of state said that the united States was not interested in removing him at all. http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/30/politics/tillerson-haley-syria-assad-turkey/ I'm not sure where the fuck you're getting this idea that Obama condoned assad. What do you mean by overthrow anyways? Militarily or otherwise?", '>>{Catbone57} : Be fair now; on alternate days, they make everything about racism.', ">>{MysticRay} : Obama let Assad stay. It's the same policy.", ">>{udownvotefacts} : Can liberals please stop suggesting that if anyone dares to disagree with a woman then they must be sexist. As a woman myself I want people to support me because they like what I have to say and they agree with my actions, not because they're scared to be labeled sexist. Hillary has fucked up time and time again. It's not her having a vagina that's the problem, it's her having an honesty issue that's the problem. Leave us women out of it!!", ">>{yeabutstill} : It hasn't even been 24 hours. The spin machine will recapture most of them", ">>{udownvotefacts} : But remember she isn't playing the woman card /s", ">>{udownvotefacts} : > A helpful note for the easily offended male participants in this thread Oh so women can't be offended at this comment? How sexist of you!!", '>>{political-hack} : > let Assad stay As opposed to fucking what? An ISIS theocracy? Another failed invasion of a middle eastern country with many dozens of American fatalities and incalculable civilian casualties? He literally did everything he was empowered to do short of declaring war because congress is the only part of government constitutionally empowered to declare war. He fucking asked congress like the constitution demands whether or not the United States should use military force against the assad regime and they denied it. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/01/world/middleeast/syria.html In what alternate reality did Obama "let assad stay"? In the reality where Obama was a Kenyan born Muslim Communist Dictator who uses the American military with impunity and ruthlessness at every opportunity? You\'ve got to be fucking trolling me at this point.', '>>{juuular} : Did you not read his comment? Assad has stepped up attacks in the past, yes, but this specific attack was a direct response to the statements of the Trump administration - statements Clinton never would have made. At least she would have been strategic in this conflict. Trump is just acting like a fool.', '>>{udownvotefacts} : Apparently as I woman not voting for Hillary I hate myself!', ">>{manzoire} : Even if its true (and its not), its terrible politics to say this. Obama rarely makes political miscalculations, and this comes off as desperate. Which means he's really scared.", '>>{5DollarShill} : He said: >>"There\'s a reason why we haven\'t had a woman president; that we as a society still grapple with what it means to see powerful women," Obama said at a DNC fundraiser in New York City. "And it still troubles us in a lot of ways, unfairly, and that expresses itself in all sorts of ways." Which means: >"Sexism may be one reason why she is having trouble." And you think it means >Everything is about sexism You\'re the same type of person who yells "All Lives Matter", aren\'t you?', ">>{5DollarShill} : What rhetoric? I am pretty fucking certain you don't even know what the word means, because what you said is just that ridiculous.", ">>{learner1314} : It is a factor, definitely. Both for and against. Some people vote against her because of it, some vote for her because of it. Let's not pretend it's just one way traffic.", '>>{rubydrops} : Almost missed the date on that one. Turns out Hannity is just a long time residence of the Upside Down.', ">>{UvonTheTerrible} : Don't worry, there are plenty of other self-hating women in the basket. Come on in.", '>>{5DollarShill} : Be honest, you yell "ALL LIVES MATTER!" don\'t you? Because if it isn\'t about **YOU**, then it\'s not an issue, right?', ">>{nvs1980} : Bernie Bros? Sanders 'shouting' at Clinton? None of this ring a bell?", '>>{bijan4187} : There is a terrible history of boy being used to denigrate black men.', '>>{georgiapeanuts} : Lol right... my post is clearly a pun on Clinton\'s line about the Sanders campaign "lying" about her. I\'m fine with a female president, which is why I\'m voting for Dr. Jill Stein. You\'re pleasant...', ">>{sedgwickian} : Let's also not pretend that there's as much traffic moving on both sides of the street. Anybody who would vote for a woman solely because she is a woman has almost certainly already been voting Democratic for a long, long time. See, also: the fact that Clinton is polling with African American voters at about the same level Obama was.", ">>{5DollarShill} : You're implying Clinton claims every criticism of her is due to sexism? Really?", '>>{nvs1980} : I never said or implied that. You need to learn how to read.', ">>{5DollarShill} : Yes you did. Right here: >/u/sedgwickian >>A helpful note for the easily offended male participants in this thread: It is possible for sexism to be a factor in Clinton's white house bid without it being the root and sole cause of every negative element of he campaign. >And you: >>You wouldn't know that given the rhetoric that has come out of her campaign. You are implying Clinton claims every criticism of her is due to sexism. That's what you are saying right here. You need to learn how to read your own shit before you post it.", '>>{nvs1980} : Your brain power is more in doubt than the other moron.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{wonderingsocrates} : How the prosperity gospel explains Donald Trump’s popularity with Christian voters', '>>{StupidRuralAmerican} : *We Christians need to spread love, by hating and vilifying the poor and immigrants.*', ">>{wonderingsocrates} : i was just doing some research on trying to figure out why christians would vote for trump and came across this july piece. it helps explain why christians would vote for him: if you are rich, then god must be blessing you, as he did to to various leaders in the old testament. it's a distorted view of the christianity, but it does help explain why 4 out of 5 evangelicals voted for trump.", '>>{AndrewRyansRapture} : Just go watch Jim Bakker to understand...I mean not understand at all. Seriously, I have nothing in common with many Americans. Who would pay hacks like that for anything?! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnaSvvSqY-8', '>>{Fun_For_Guill} : When the words of your holy texts can be reinterpreted in order to justify your immoral behaviour your holy texts are worthless. I see no difference between Islamic extremists using a very loose interpretation of the Koran to justify murder and the Christian evangelicals of America using a very loose interpretation of the bible to justify their hoarding of wealth at the expense of the poor. Jesus after all was an Arabic socialist Jew whose world view is incompatible with capitalism. And god is not some simple genie granting wishes of wealth and fortune on those that pray the hardest.', '>>{OldMutant} : You can\'t read the article without signing up so I\'ll just have to guess what the writer says from the tile. If the article writer thinks the "prosperity gospel" had anything to do with Christians voting Trump the article writer is a clueless idiot. Christians voted Trump because Supreme Court primarily. The demoncrat party has been steadily infringing on the religious luberty the Constitution guarantees and we need to see that changed. Thus Trump.', '>>{mrbarky} : Oh bullshit. Joel Osteen, Paula White, and all the crew at Trinity Broadcasting push that shit. There may be minority adherents, but it is rooted in white Pentecostal traditions.', ">>{PointNShooty} : I know why Christians voted for him: he bothered to talk to them. Where was Hillary's Christian outreach?", '>>{wonderingsocrates} : yeah, there is a long tradition, e. w. kenyon and “new thought” preachers like norman vincent peale after ww2, arguing wealth is actually a sign from god. plus for those that remember jim bakker, he was, along with peter popoff, in the same circle.', '>>{Artful_Dodger_42} : So...if God gives wealth to the most Christian people, then Jesus must have been a dirty, penniless, sinner. /s', '>>{Stoga} : > but it is rooted in white Pentecostal traditions. And goes against everything Christ preached about the dangers of mammon worship.', '>>{Stoga} : And quite a few Christians did NOT vote for Trump, as evidenced by the lead in vote count by Hillary Clinton.', '>>{TheCaptainDamnIt} : My personal thoughts are that in the U.S. a lot of christianity IS a political/economic system much more than it\'s a \'biblical\' religion. This is why there are so many things that you must also follow to be a \'true christian\' that have noting to do with (or in many cases are contrary) to what\'s in the bible. From hating gays, to loving unrestricted access to guns, to trickle down economics, to hating immigrates, to foreign policy, to blaming \'hollywood\', to watching FOX news, to fearing black people, to driving large vehicles and loving country music (for some reason). All these things political things are now just part of the christian religion for many. And It\'s why so many rants by religious figures contain off the track attacks on "liberals". Trump ticks a lot of those boxes. But it started with those awful calvinist/puritans that first started the belief (in the U.S.) in predestination, believing that god shows who his favored people are by bestowing wealth on them. From the beginning much of U.S. christianity has looked upon the rich as being inherently better people in all regards by the very nature of them being rich. A wealthy man to an american christian must have been ‘blessed’ by god, and to be blessed one must be ‘morally supers’ by definition. Of course the opposite then becomes that for this version of christianity the poor then by definition are ‘morally corrupt’ ‘lazy’ and ‘cursed by god’. Everyone gets what they deserve according to these people, and no amount of ‘work’ or ‘moral restraint’ done by the individual actually matters, it’s all about the economic outcome that tells them how to judge the character of a person (and why black people where viewed as cursed because they where slaves, if god had loved them, he wouldn’t have made them slaves). Now take this already disgusting theology and add in the “Red Scare” and cold war attempts to wrap the U.S. flag around the cross and you get where we are today. A christianity that claims to worship christ, but actually worships the wealthy. A christianity that claims to follow the teachings of christ, but loathes, hates, and blames the ‘cursed’ poor. A christianity that is more about following ‘the market’ than about their ‘god’. They have become more a religon of Ayn Rand than Jesus. When viewed through this lenses the Creflo Dollar’s not only make perfect sense, but are a logical conclusion of U.S. christianity. It explains why we don\'t have universal healthcare (if god wanted to help those poor people he would make them rich enough to afford to see the doctor) It explains so many things non-americans find contradictory about us. It explains the (now growing) backlash to Pope Francis (who preaches the exact opposite). It explains my favorite contradiction, that those christians here who refuse to accept evolution as true, are often the biggest proponents of social Darwinistic economics(the social darwinistic language that comes out of Christianity today is astounding). Hell it even explains Donald Trump (may christians look at his wealth as making him right, a \'winner\' with gods \'blessings\')! I sometimes wonder if U.S. christians will ever wake up to what they have become, but since these beliefs have become so prevalent here that even non-christians are wrapped up in them I fear we’re just screwed as a society and it all started at the beginning.', ">>{getridofappleskitle} : just keep distancing yourself guys, it's working great so far! /s", ">>{balmergrl} : My new favorite is an old favorite Jim Bakker, at first I thought it was a Christopher Guest skit or some kind of joke they are so wacky - and I didn't recognize Jim with the facial hair he now sports and his current show is a big step down from PTL heydays. When Jim got indicted on fraud and conspiracy in the late 80's and sentenced to 45 years, I remember our housekeeper told me that it was a shame because he saved a lot of people with his ministry. I think they appeal to certain socioeconomic demographics, all money is green.", '>>{Viat0r} : Calvinism is a very influential school of thought within the protestant tradition.', '>>{balmergrl} : Did you see the one where they are begging for people to join the $100/month "President Club" because they were so busy praying for Donald that they forgot to raise money? The mental gymnastics to be both doomsday and prosperity... My husband called to inquire about the buckets of dehydrated food Bakker and team now hawk, if we still need to invest in them even though Donald has been prayed into office. I can\'t stop him from trolling those poor operators, cheap kicks lol.', '>>{PointNShooty} : >if they were prone to reaching out to, LOL are you seriously suggesting that it\'s not the job of the candidate to reach out to as many voters as possible? Christianity is the most popular religion in the country, how many churches did Clinton give speeches in? I know plenty of pro choice Christians. Saying that Clinton was correct in ignoring the Christian vote because it "kills the conversation" is ridiculous. There was no conversation to kill, Clinton didn\'t even attempt to appeal to that demographic.', ">>{wonderingsocrates} : i didn't say she ignored the christian vote. i said she ignored the conservative/fundamentalist christian vote (that's what we are discussing here- conservative evangelicals). she didn't speak, like sanders, at liberty baptist univ., she always, to my knowledge, speaks at churches that welcome her and are democratic thru and thru, not republican and socially conservative in policy."], ['>>{LostAccountant} : Amusing the prisonplanet people being so strongly pro-russian useful idiots that they already drop off the trumptrain after just 1 strike in response to a **frakking chemical attack**', '>>{Wolf-Head} : If you thought voting Republican meant no war you were fooling yourself.', '>>{MysticRay} : True but it would have happened [either way](http://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-hillary-clinton-idUSKBN179058).', '>>{TumNarDok} : > Glad our arrogant Pres. is enjoying his taxpayer funded golf outing after announcing the US should take military action against Syria — Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) September 4, 2013 rofl', ">>{mafuuuba} : Lemme get this straight. Trump signs away their privacy... not a pip from the Trumpters. Trump tries to get rid of their healthcare, same. Just making America Great again is all. Trump bombs Syria... all of a sudden they don't like him anymore. Don't get me wrong, I don't like that this is happening either but that's some fucked up priorities there.", ">>{oahut} : 34% approval and dropping. Let's see how much support Trump has by Monday.", '>>{TumNarDok} : it is all about how currently visible things are. privacy and healthcare you will only notice the impact in a year or so, the pictures of war are readily availbable. sheeples live in the here and now.', '>>{sapplylapply} : Unfortunately this military action might stop that drop. Americans love a strong leader. It might hurt Trump with some of his hardcore base, but help with the rest of the US.', ">>{sapplylapply} : I mean they would be the biggest hypocrites if not. They cried for months that Hillary's proposed action will lead to WW3. This only shows that they genuinely believed the lies they spreaded. On the other hand it won't take long for them to come around. What are they gonna do? Admit they were wrong? Never.", '>>{FattestRabbit} : Yeah, except Hillary made her intentions clear from the get-go and Trump ran on *not being Hillary*.', '>>{AdoptMeBrangelina} : Please tell me there are bots flooding his twitter feed with this?', ">>{Muppet1616} : The gas attack during Obama's presidency caused 10x more casualties (1500 people died). The pro-Russian usefull idiots (which included trump) were vehemetely opposed to intervention then as well. And honestly I agree, bombing the shit out of a country is pretty easy for the US, however there is no gurantee what so ever that the lives of the people living in the country improve in subsequent years (just look at Iraq and Afghanistan).", ">>{Wolf-Head} : Because it's a talking point. We don't even know if this would have happened if Clinton won. Assad clearly thought he could get away with this with Trump in office. And even if it did there'd be a more considered process than launching missile before we even talked to our allies, or congress.", ">>{A_ducks_nipples} : no it would happen in different ways. for example. trump administration does not even have assistant secretary of state or assistant secretary of defense. half the offices in the pentagon are empty and same at the state department. this kind of incompetence is unthinkable in any other presidency. another difference is how often trump tweets about shit he has no business tweeting about. imagine if there was an armed confrontation between us and russian soldiers the last thing we need is for trump raging like a 10 year old on twitter. especially when the professionals that are supposed to handle situations like those are not appointed or not qualified enough to be confirmed finally, and probably most dangerous is donald trump's lack of credibility. this is the guy that sends his people out to talk about obama wiretapping, bowling green massacre, etc. trump hangs out with people like alex jones, ben carson, etc. trump and his associates are under investigation for collusion with russia. all these factors combine to make everyone unsure whether to take what he says seriously.", '>>{Heirsandgraces} : I think though that HRC would have had all the intelligence reports ready, a full knowledgeable compliment of staff at the Pentagon, a Secretary of State more attuned to the history and any new shifts in intelligence with the Syrian Government and would have exhausted all other options before giving the order, rather than triggering her with a picture of a beautiful baby.', ">>{MysticRay} : >Because it's a talking point. It's a logical response to your own talking point. >Assad clearly thought he could get away with this with Trump in office. He must have felt the same about Obama. Clinton wanted to fight Assad [then](https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/04/world/syria-exposes-split-between-obama-and-clinton.html), too. >And even if it did there'd be a more considered process And how would the outcome have been different?", ">>{Wolf-Head} : Well considering one of my point is this may not have happened, those kids wouldn't have been gassed. Hell they may have been here since Clinton wouldn't be trying to ban them in the first place.", ">>{MysticRay} : Assad escalated attacks on his people years ago. Your theory isn't based on anything.", '>>{Shilalasar} : I´ll give you a few hints: Visiblity is everything for them. They believe and care about what they see and what they see the most. Healthcare, covered as good if gone, so they did not care. Privacy, covered by american internetfans, but not "their media", so they cared a bit. Bombs on Syria, covered by their media and russian bots, trolls and paid shills. Lots of noise so they care about it a lot', '>>{RoastedWithHoney} : Blaming Trump for the privacy law is not entirely accurate and I would argue you are misrepresenting the debate over the affordable healthcare act, which a lot of Trump supporters did not support the replacement. The Syria thing is because many Trump supporters do not want the US intervening in foreign wars, or engaging in regime change. You are obviously over simplifying the issues and misrepresenting Trump supporters.', '>>{LostAccountant} : There is full scale intervention and there is a retaliatory strike. The thing with chemical attacks is that they are banned, as such when they are used, such behaviour should be punished, otherwise armies will simply keep using them without consequence. Bombing the airfield from which the strike took place is then proportional.', ">>{political-hack} : It's based on the fact that Rex decoded that we should support the Assad regime or at least stay or of the conflict. Basically condoning the behaviour by condoning the person.", ">>{MysticRay} : There's no reason to think that Assad would have refrained from the attack if Clinton were in office.", ">>{VeryVito} : With a divided Congress, anything that becomes law today rests squarely on Trump's slumping shoulders. He could veto anything coming out of Congress, and it would be gone forever. No way this wrecking crew is overturning a veto today. He won't do this, of course, because he is aware that his term in office is contingent on whether Republicans still put up with his incompetence. As soon as they decide he's no longer useful to them, he's out.", '>>{political-hack} : Except the secretary of state condoning the leadership of the guy who already used chemical weapons. Do not fucking tell me that a Clinton Sec of State would do the fucking same.', '>>{MysticRay} : Exactly. Obama condoned the continued leadership of the guy who already used chemical weapons and Clinton wanted to overthrow him.', ">>{political-hack} : Obama did everything to hurt Assad short of declaring war. Trump's sec of state said that the united States was not interested in removing him at all. http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/30/politics/tillerson-haley-syria-assad-turkey/ I'm not sure where the fuck you're getting this idea that Obama condoned assad. What do you mean by overthrow anyways? Militarily or otherwise?", ">>{MysticRay} : Obama let Assad stay. It's the same policy.", ">>{yeabutstill} : It hasn't even been 24 hours. The spin machine will recapture most of them", '>>{political-hack} : > let Assad stay As opposed to fucking what? An ISIS theocracy? Another failed invasion of a middle eastern country with many dozens of American fatalities and incalculable civilian casualties? He literally did everything he was empowered to do short of declaring war because congress is the only part of government constitutionally empowered to declare war. He fucking asked congress like the constitution demands whether or not the United States should use military force against the assad regime and they denied it. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/01/world/middleeast/syria.html In what alternate reality did Obama "let assad stay"? In the reality where Obama was a Kenyan born Muslim Communist Dictator who uses the American military with impunity and ruthlessness at every opportunity? You\'ve got to be fucking trolling me at this point.', '>>{juuular} : Did you not read his comment? Assad has stepped up attacks in the past, yes, but this specific attack was a direct response to the statements of the Trump administration - statements Clinton never would have made. At least she would have been strategic in this conflict. Trump is just acting like a fool.', '>>{rubydrops} : Almost missed the date on that one. Turns out Hannity is just a long time residence of the Upside Down.'], ['>>{sglville} : Leave it on the charger for a few days and you might get lucky.', ">>{gaffeyManzZ} : Take it to a 3rd party shop and just see if a new battery turns it on. I work in a repair shop and we've had a couple people in your exact situation", ">>{thefuckingswampking} : Mine just died as well. I spilled a glass of water on it and couldn't save it in time. Luckily this was a couple days ago, and I'm good for an upgrade on Friday. In all of my years in phones, this is the first one I've ever fucked up though. So I'm proud of that lol I feel ya on all the lost data. Fuckin sucks man :(", ">>{TheBrainwasher14} : You've just inspired me to start backing up my iPhone 6 again. It's even older than yours", ">>{TannerHill} : I used this place for recovering data off my mothers iPhone 6 Plus after the phone was bent. Please have yourself a look, it's not cheap but if your data is important to you, here's the premium quality service to use (Jessa will help you out) http://www.mendonipadrehab.com", ">>{Zengru} : My girlfriend's iPhone 6 was starting to die, fingerprint reader wasn't reading, having weird glitches, being slower than it used to be, etc., so we decided to upgrade hers to an iPhone 7 Plus for me and she'd get my 6S, because I was craving a larger screen and she wanted a smaller one, but one that actually works. Newer iPhones really don't last all that long unfortunately. 2 years tops it seems. Assuming you have Wifi at home, make sure the auto iCloud backup is on, and backup manually to a computer with iTunes every week or so, depending on how much you change things. Cause losing all that stuff sucks.", ">>{TheBrainwasher14} : > we decided to upgrade hers to an iPhone 7 Plus for me and she'd get my 6S Lol wut", '>>{Zengru} : She used her upgrade for the 7 Plus and we swapped phones. Just a simple reset, restore, sim swap.', ">>{x3n0n1c} : There still tons of iphone 5, 5s, and 6s out there. Some people get unlucky but it doesn't mean they all will die. I manage the phones here at my company and in the 2 years since its release I've had exactly 1 iPhone 6 come back due to non-damage related failure, and that was due to a faulty battery which apple replaced free. I suppose we have been lucky with the touch IC death though, hear a lot about that.", ">>{Zengru} : It just seems like there's more 3G/3GS/4/4S out there running strong than 5S or 6. It's like instead of making phones that people will be able to carry for 7 years, Apple is designing the internals to not last as long and start dying out around that 2 year contract point, so people are forced to upgrade. Planned obsolescence and all that. I've seen more 3G and 4 out and about than 5. But maybe that's just because I live in a town of old people.", ">>{x3n0n1c} : I live in downtown Toronto and take the packed subway to and from work everyday, and I see mostly 5/5S/6/6S phones. 5 and 5S's are easy to spot by checking if there is TouchId, though the SE lines in a case are a crapshoot for figuring out if its a 5S or not, unless its rose gold. The 5 line (or maybe SE) I see all the time. Tons still have em. I don't see 4 or 4s that often, and can't remember the last time I saw someone using anything lower than that.", ">>{Zengru} : Yeah it's probably just the area I live in then. It's basically a rich retirement town and they don't seem to like to get rid of stuff if what they have works. And all they need is to be able to call their grandkids and maybe check Facebook every once in a while."], [">>{Singlemalt_28} : Obama suggests sexism could be hurting Clinton's White House bid", ">>{TrumpGal} : Well, this should be a refreshing change from the argument that anyone voting for Hillary's opponent is just racist.", ">>{georgiapeanuts} : I'm so sick of the Clinton Campaign making everything about sexism, I'm sick of it.", ">>{lovely_sombrero} : Weren't Clinton supporters also accusing him and his supporters of being sexist in 2008 primary? Just found out I've been sexist for 8+ years now.", ">>{UvonTheTerrible} : Of course. If you're a man and you are not voting for Clinton then you're sexist by default.", ">>{nvs1980} : Of course it is... just like racism prevented Obama from getting elected... oh wait. If not for Trump, Clinton would be the most disliked and untrusted person to ever run for office. Not because she's female, but because she's untrustworthy and unlikeable.", '>>{SlicedDicedBeef} : Anything except her policies, corruption, and health.', '>>{ras344} : Sure, it has nothing to do with her just being a terrible candidate.', ">>{sedgwickian} : A helpful note for the easily offended male participants in this thread: It is possible for sexism to be a factor in Clinton's white house bid without it being the root and sole cause of every negative element of he campaign.", '>>{Sam_Munhi} : They are officially in hail mary mode as a campaign. Do they actually think this is going to work?', '>>{kyonu} : Yes, of course. Sexism. Not her lying. Not her scandals. Not her health. Not her lack of transparency. Not her lack of policy. Not her lack of activism. Just sexism.', '>>{dalovindj} : Good luck with that strategy. Worked out great for the new Ghostbusters.', '>>{bijan4187} : Like clockwork the sexism angle is played by the clintons. Just like she tried with obama and sanders. The woman who cried wolf. Lets forget her own racist and sexist antics towards obama in 2008 and slut shaming any woman ever that accused bill of anything. Shes shameless.', ">>{TheAmazingAsshole2} : There's more people voting for Clinton because she's a woman than people not voting for her for it.", '>>{SunriseSurprise} : Or it could be shit [like this](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/53id42/hillarys_it_guy_reportedly_tried_to_remove_sender/).', ">>{nvs1980} : You wouldn't know that given the rhetoric that has come out of her campaign.", ">>{OnlyFactsMatter} : Anyone notice the first female Presidential candidate doesn't have the excitement that the first black President did? Want to know why? Clinton is a terrible candidate. 2008 was perfect for Obama: - Coming off Bush's awful Presidency. People wanted change and Obama nailed it flawlessly - Obama was only half black. Could a Ben Carson or Alan Keyes be the first black President? Probably not, so Obama being only half-white helped a lot - He was a great Orator and inspired many people - He was young. At 47 he is one of the 5 youngest Presidents ever etc. etc. Basically, it was the perfect storm. Clinton could have probably brought that excitement in 2008, but now it seems like her time has passed and she is just trying to FORCE hype, rather than let it develop naturally like with Obama.", '>>{bijan4187} : While calling his fans "obama boys". Word of advice to white people, dont use the term boy towards a black man ever.', '>>{sedgwickian} : TIL "sexism could be hurting Clinton\'s bid" == "Sexism is the only thing hurting Clinton\'s bid."', '>>{MonsieurIneos} : Maybe.. just maybe at first. However since then she has given people plenty, and I mean PLENTY of other reasons to not like her. Being a women is either not on the list, or is at the bottom of the list of reasons not to vote for her. Though Trump has a giant list of reasons not to vote for him either. This election is annoying.', '>>{Catbone57} : Be fair now; on alternate days, they make everything about racism.', ">>{udownvotefacts} : Can liberals please stop suggesting that if anyone dares to disagree with a woman then they must be sexist. As a woman myself I want people to support me because they like what I have to say and they agree with my actions, not because they're scared to be labeled sexist. Hillary has fucked up time and time again. It's not her having a vagina that's the problem, it's her having an honesty issue that's the problem. Leave us women out of it!!", ">>{udownvotefacts} : But remember she isn't playing the woman card /s", ">>{udownvotefacts} : > A helpful note for the easily offended male participants in this thread Oh so women can't be offended at this comment? How sexist of you!!", '>>{udownvotefacts} : Apparently as I woman not voting for Hillary I hate myself!', ">>{manzoire} : Even if its true (and its not), its terrible politics to say this. Obama rarely makes political miscalculations, and this comes off as desperate. Which means he's really scared.", '>>{5DollarShill} : He said: >>"There\'s a reason why we haven\'t had a woman president; that we as a society still grapple with what it means to see powerful women," Obama said at a DNC fundraiser in New York City. "And it still troubles us in a lot of ways, unfairly, and that expresses itself in all sorts of ways." Which means: >"Sexism may be one reason why she is having trouble." And you think it means >Everything is about sexism You\'re the same type of person who yells "All Lives Matter", aren\'t you?', ">>{5DollarShill} : What rhetoric? I am pretty fucking certain you don't even know what the word means, because what you said is just that ridiculous.", ">>{learner1314} : It is a factor, definitely. Both for and against. Some people vote against her because of it, some vote for her because of it. Let's not pretend it's just one way traffic.", ">>{UvonTheTerrible} : Don't worry, there are plenty of other self-hating women in the basket. Come on in.", '>>{5DollarShill} : Be honest, you yell "ALL LIVES MATTER!" don\'t you? Because if it isn\'t about **YOU**, then it\'s not an issue, right?', ">>{nvs1980} : Bernie Bros? Sanders 'shouting' at Clinton? None of this ring a bell?", '>>{bijan4187} : There is a terrible history of boy being used to denigrate black men.', '>>{georgiapeanuts} : Lol right... my post is clearly a pun on Clinton\'s line about the Sanders campaign "lying" about her. I\'m fine with a female president, which is why I\'m voting for Dr. Jill Stein. You\'re pleasant...', ">>{sedgwickian} : Let's also not pretend that there's as much traffic moving on both sides of the street. Anybody who would vote for a woman solely because she is a woman has almost certainly already been voting Democratic for a long, long time. See, also: the fact that Clinton is polling with African American voters at about the same level Obama was.", ">>{5DollarShill} : You're implying Clinton claims every criticism of her is due to sexism? Really?", '>>{nvs1980} : I never said or implied that. You need to learn how to read.', ">>{5DollarShill} : Yes you did. Right here: >/u/sedgwickian >>A helpful note for the easily offended male participants in this thread: It is possible for sexism to be a factor in Clinton's white house bid without it being the root and sole cause of every negative element of he campaign. >And you: >>You wouldn't know that given the rhetoric that has come out of her campaign. You are implying Clinton claims every criticism of her is due to sexism. That's what you are saying right here. You need to learn how to read your own shit before you post it.", '>>{nvs1980} : Your brain power is more in doubt than the other moron.']]

classify and reply

['>>{redditblow} : This wall clock syncs with your smart devices to organize your life', '>>{TheWarlockk} : Aleppo-gate Reporter: “…don’t blame Gary Johnson for his ignorance or his inability to speak to what is happening… he’s not alone. Neither of the two major candidates—Trump and Clinton—have been asked the same simple question…”', ">>{cheedarthese} : Seems rather pointless. I can't really see the benefit of having a clock on the wall when 99% you have your phone next to you. If they made a harry potter style clock where it told you where people were that would be a different matter.", ">>{OfficialShrav} : As creepy as your Harry Potter clock sounds, I don't think it should be that difficult to realize such a product. Just use their Google/swarm/facebook profiles in an app and you would know when Voldemort would strike next!", '>>{Mrpornogoregrind} : Hahaha, next time just pay the monthly insurance. They will replace stolen or lost phones.', ">>{Celestiaaaaa} : Sorry to hear. Mine got stolen a while back too. Better to just get it insured and see if the policy covers theft. In that case you'd pay a small fee at best and in return - another phone.", ">>{GhazelleBerner} : Yes, I'm sure you guys would bend over backwards to defend Clinton if she made the same mistake.", '>>{Beezure} : If you had find my iphone on it, it will be icloud locked. No jailbreak gets around that. All they have to do is pop out the sim card to keep you from tracking it...(and put in airplane mode)', ">>{AOldUsername} : Yeah, I agree with /u/cheedarthese. This is only useful for not missing Ubers, and really, I don't see why anyone would buy this when you can put a reminder.", ">>{UDPGuy} : You can not jailbreak to gain access. If you have find my iPhone on, they won't be able to use it without your password, even with a restore.", '>>{Heyyitsmesusan} : Just be lucky that apple cares about security to implement a feature like FMIP. but hey, good luck with android.', ">>{rekthavoc} : I'm not really sure if I activated it on my phone. But the lock mode is available in my icloud...", ">>{ME24601} : >Neither of the two major candidates—Trump and Clinton—have been asked the same simple question…” I'm pretty sure I can say without hesitation that neither Trump or Clinton would respond to that question by asking what Aleppo is.", '>>{thiscouldbemassive} : Enough with attaching "gate" to every blink and you\'ll miss it controversy. He blew a question, that\'s all. Embarrassing but not remotely illegal. And I say this as someone who will never in a million years vote for Johnson.', ">>{Backflip_Wilson} : Aleppo-gate? This isn't really even a controversy about a guy who really isn't going to be President. Also, the suffix -gate... fucking stop it.", '>>{superdupermensch} : If you have one clock, you know what time it is. If you have 2, you can never be sure.', '>>{Roseking} : I am confident that our former SoS can answer the question.', ">>{thejournalizer} : For those saying nay to this, I think there are a few things to keep in mind. These things would probably be adopted more so by older folks who don't actually keep their phone on them 24/7. Better yet, if you have an office and it can harass you until you leave for a meeting. I know a bunch of my meeting notifications on my phone get dismissed and then I totally forget to leave for a meeting. I personally wouldn't buy this though.", ">>{Eazy75217} : I always set my manual clocks on appliances, wall clocks, cars etc. at least 10 mins ahead so I'm not late to anything. So doesn't help my routine at all", '>>{tangibleadhd} : >“What would you do if you were elected about Aleppo?” He should probably improve his grammar', '>>{kastid} : This isn\'t for you, this is for everyone around you. If I could get one that showed me when my team would be "in" vs "out" of the office it\'d be great!', ">>{MCRemix} : Trump would have no idea, but he wouldn't bother asking. He'd just ramble about how it's a disaster, the policies of Obama and Clinton and how we need new leadership on this issue to put America First again. Clinton would know what it was, the current population, the biggest issues facing them and how much a loaf of bread costs there, just in case you ever want to hear that.", '>>{Tangled2} : How does a clock help "organize" something?', '>>{IbanezDavy} : Clinton: "Syria is a major problem. As secretary of state it was my job to deal with this kind of tragedy. I wasn\'t perfect... *two minutes later no answer to the actual question* ...and I will continue to try to make Aleppo safe again. Interviewer: *No follow up* > < Donald Trump: "Aleppo! I love APPELLO! I would put the best people to work with him. The absolute best." Interviewer: "Him? It\'s a city..." Donald Trump: I can assign genders to cities. What do you think *Apalepto* is a girls name? I think strong. Tough. The absolute best when I hear it. Interviewer: I think we are wondering off... Donald Trump: "We will do what is done...but be the best. You know who is really terrible. Obama. Obama and Clinton. They founded ISIS you know. Obama calls it ISIL, but we all know its ISIS." Interviewer: "It\'s an american acrony...." Trump: "This really is a gotcha question. Lets move on." Interviewer: "But I want to get back to the ques...." Trump: "No, I think people understand where I stand...lets move on".', '>>{F22Rapture} : Yeah, this "*gate" shit never lives up to the orignal.', ">>{thumbprick} : stein: war is bad. We shouldn't do that anymore.", ">>{Wolf-Head} : No I wouldn't. I'd laugh at her then get distracted by the right claiming this means she's senile and has brain cancer.", '>>{rekthavoc} : I believe thief nowadays know exactly what to do with the phone they stole. Sell it to the black market and have it unlocked.', ">>{currentsc0nvulsive} : If you knew it would be stolen why buy it? Don't blame the iphone, blame the scum that stole it", '>>{malpais} : Bullshit. Does anyone really think Hillary Clinton is unfamiliar with Aleppo? Jesus.', '>>{AOldUsername} : I read the article and only recall seeing it being for Uber, but okay. The product though should appeal to as many demographics as they could, because it would make this entire product a moot point.', ">>{SebastianJanssen} : I don't think that was at all implied in the article. Clinton ought to know Aleppo as well as the bull knows that china shop.", ">>{DoTheDew} : They can't unlock it. They can sell it for parts though.", '>>{talones} : They cant. Nobody can jailbreak a device without the passcode, and you cant reinstall ios without the icloud password. Yes they probably just turned it off and will probably keep it turned off for a while until they can just blindly sell it to someone. Hopefully it will come back online soon.', '>>{lalix89} : I set mine 3 mins faster and it works for me', ">>{IbanezDavy} : Now? no. Back when it started. Known fact. She brags about her involvement. But what she doesn't tell you is Obama and her armed several different factions. Some of which got defeated by ISIS (thus the arms went to Daesh). Others joined ISIS. All to overthrow Assad. ISIS is also fighting Assad. An enemy of my enemy is my friend even if it was my original enemy? I'm not sure that's how it goes... This shit be known. This is what she wants to continue to do. We couldn't stabilize Iraq while occupying it and she wants to do what we did in Iraq (oust the leader) without sending troops in? That is called arrogance. And a failure to understand when your tactics are wrong... But you know...Americans could give a shit. Syrians aren't Americans. Their lives only partially matter am I right?", ">>{IndomitableServant} : Actively funding people that later turn against you and your interests is a failure in leadership and plan implementation. For all her supposed criticism of Republicans handling warfare and regime change she has committed all the same failures and experiencing the same blowback. It's no different than when America was buddy buddy with Mujahideen and proto-AQ during Regan to defeat the Soviets in Afghanistan. This shit has happened before and Clinton should've known better. The same bullshit happened in Libya as well.", ">>{theplott} : It's really unimaginable that Hillary wouldn't know what and where Aleppo is. On the other hand, we all died laughing when Hillary claimed Nancy Reagan was an advocate for AIDS sufferers in the 80s.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : > had a hand in causing it Not caused by herself. But she played a role. Try not to misrepresent what I say. here's a [source] (http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-33997408) Relative part: > Ford told administration officials years ago they should arm the rebels. If the US doesn't help, he said at the time, extremists will give them money and lure them into their organisations. Those who supported his approach, the Arms for Rebels group, included then-CIA Director David Petraeus, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and most of the foreign-policy establishment in Washington, both Democrat and Republican. Low and behold, they armed them and some of them joined ISIS anyways. And she still thinks this is the way to go. This is her talking point, that and getting rid of Assad. It should also be noted that Nation Security experts almost all agree that Syria would be at least relatively stable with Assad having control.", '>>{PM_ME_DICK_PICTURES} : No problem. Maybe [this video](https://youtu.be/IpAqoxZvsso) will convince you even further.', '>>{IbanezDavy} : > had a hand in causing it... Had a hand does not mean soul causer of the issue. But I\'m going to ignore the strawman. The actual larger issue of Syria started due to a drought. As far as allowing ISIS to take control of large swaths of land, that is almost directly caused by her and Obama arming rebels who would either join or get defeated by ISIS. Thus ISIS acquired their arms. Without Clinton and Obama making this decision and that of universally opposing Assad, ISIS almost definitely wouldn\'t control huge portions of Syria. ISIS wasn\'t a thing until Obama and Clinton (they existed, but as a small faction mostly stationed in Jordan and Lebanon). At the time the argument from the right was "Obama is arming the muslim brotherhood cause he\'s muslim". No Obama was not doing that, and he had good intentions behind it. It was just misguided and led to the rise of ISIS.', ">>{IbanezDavy} : > You are either lying or misinformed about this I'm actually fairly educated on this topic. And we didn't 'lightly' arm them. YOU are misinformed. It started off light. Medical supplies (which I support). But they actually tried training people in Jordan and eventually escalated to heavily arming them. Daesh is a product of Obama and Clinton having a poor grip on Syria. They existed before them, but they gained power through their missteps. Her supporters failing to understand this is the same as GWB supporters failing to understand that invading Iraq was a mistake. Learn from mistakes.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : How about you start supplying some *citations* keyboard warrior. Seriously just do some actual research. We supplied them M72 (Anti-tank rocket launchers) and BGM-71 (Anti tank missile launchers). Are those not 'heavy' to you? It was well beyond just rifles. And that's not even stuff we probably funneled to them through Saudi Arabia. And that's also just the stuff we have footage, pictures or reports of. http://www.businessinsider.com/syrian-rebels-may-have-used-us-made-tow-missiles-to-kill-russian-officers-in-syria-2016-2 http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-arms-idUSKBN0TE1KJ20151125 Denial of these likely events is not even helpful.", ">>{Real_Muthsera} : I'm no great lover of Clinton to say the least. But there is not good answer here. It is really the same question as to what we should do about ISIS. But I think actually the question is how we can help people living under conflict. Aleppo is just a symbol of people suffering under a brutal civil war. And what is our responsibility for fixing that. The question is actually much closer to how do we fix war and get world peace than you might thing. So, what is Clinton to say here? Syria is a Russian ally. As long as we have an antagonistic relationship with Russia this will prevail. But we tried to reconcile with Russia under my tenure as SoS by hitting the reset button. It didn't work. It's much worse than it ever was. So the only way to overcome the Aleppo problem is either to give up. Or to outright beat the Syrian regime. The last one is extremely hard to do as we have to first overcome the ISIS forces with the Syrian regime. Then we have to join the secular and sunni forces that are not completely fanatical along with the kurds in one united front against the Syrian regime. But that will take years of conflict and it is unlikely to succeed as our closest allies in the region are Turkey who are part of NATO and will not support any actions that is going to strengthen the Kurdish positions. And the secular forces are so few that we're unlikely to win over with them alone. Iraq is another problem as they are heavily Shia, and we can't expect them to join in with us to destroy the Shia Syrian regime. The only realistic option to limit the suffering for people who live in Aleppo in the short term horizon. Is to outright give in to the Syrian regime with a deal where they get to stay in power. Which is unlikely as they have the upper hand right now and are on the offensive. Really. How are you going to conway that complicated situation to an average viewer in less than 3 minutes?", '>>{DoTheDew} : No, sorry. Nothing more convincing than a video of a man speaking in Chinese with a couple thousand views? Show me something where lots of others are able to reproduce those results. Show me something where a reputable publication is reporting that iCloud can be bypassed.', ">>{PM_ME_DICK_PICTURES} : This is a reproducible result. Problem is, is expensive as fuck (each tool is close to $1K) and the only way to buy this tool is to go through Chinese sites and dealers. So of course you're not going to hear about it in the western media. Here's [another video](https://youtu.be/2bGb5AOwp44) showing off the cloning functions of the program. Note how it uses a similar tool and the same program.", ">>{DoTheDew} : Those are just scams. If someone had a legit tool to bypass iCloud lock, then they'd make it semi-affordable so that people would actually buy it. I can't find a single reputable source that says any of those methods in those videos are legit.", ">>{PM_ME_DICK_PICTURES} : That's because this tool isn't just for iCloud unlocking. It does a lot of other shit. And if they're the only ones that do it, why would you want to sell your shit cheaply? I'd milk it for as long as I could. And you're right, this isnt legit. It's like a grey area. And again, you're not going to be able to find reputable sources because the western media has never heard of this before because it's from China. But I'm pretty sure some reputable sources have wrote about the storage upgrade."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{TheWarlockk} : Aleppo-gate Reporter: “…don’t blame Gary Johnson for his ignorance or his inability to speak to what is happening… he’s not alone. Neither of the two major candidates—Trump and Clinton—have been asked the same simple question…”', ">>{GhazelleBerner} : Yes, I'm sure you guys would bend over backwards to defend Clinton if she made the same mistake.", ">>{ME24601} : >Neither of the two major candidates—Trump and Clinton—have been asked the same simple question…” I'm pretty sure I can say without hesitation that neither Trump or Clinton would respond to that question by asking what Aleppo is.", '>>{thiscouldbemassive} : Enough with attaching "gate" to every blink and you\'ll miss it controversy. He blew a question, that\'s all. Embarrassing but not remotely illegal. And I say this as someone who will never in a million years vote for Johnson.', ">>{Backflip_Wilson} : Aleppo-gate? This isn't really even a controversy about a guy who really isn't going to be President. Also, the suffix -gate... fucking stop it.", '>>{Roseking} : I am confident that our former SoS can answer the question.', '>>{tangibleadhd} : >“What would you do if you were elected about Aleppo?” He should probably improve his grammar', ">>{MCRemix} : Trump would have no idea, but he wouldn't bother asking. He'd just ramble about how it's a disaster, the policies of Obama and Clinton and how we need new leadership on this issue to put America First again. Clinton would know what it was, the current population, the biggest issues facing them and how much a loaf of bread costs there, just in case you ever want to hear that.", '>>{IbanezDavy} : Clinton: "Syria is a major problem. As secretary of state it was my job to deal with this kind of tragedy. I wasn\'t perfect... *two minutes later no answer to the actual question* ...and I will continue to try to make Aleppo safe again. Interviewer: *No follow up* > < Donald Trump: "Aleppo! I love APPELLO! I would put the best people to work with him. The absolute best." Interviewer: "Him? It\'s a city..." Donald Trump: I can assign genders to cities. What do you think *Apalepto* is a girls name? I think strong. Tough. The absolute best when I hear it. Interviewer: I think we are wondering off... Donald Trump: "We will do what is done...but be the best. You know who is really terrible. Obama. Obama and Clinton. They founded ISIS you know. Obama calls it ISIL, but we all know its ISIS." Interviewer: "It\'s an american acrony...." Trump: "This really is a gotcha question. Lets move on." Interviewer: "But I want to get back to the ques...." Trump: "No, I think people understand where I stand...lets move on".', '>>{F22Rapture} : Yeah, this "*gate" shit never lives up to the orignal.', ">>{thumbprick} : stein: war is bad. We shouldn't do that anymore.", ">>{Wolf-Head} : No I wouldn't. I'd laugh at her then get distracted by the right claiming this means she's senile and has brain cancer.", '>>{malpais} : Bullshit. Does anyone really think Hillary Clinton is unfamiliar with Aleppo? Jesus.', ">>{SebastianJanssen} : I don't think that was at all implied in the article. Clinton ought to know Aleppo as well as the bull knows that china shop.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : Now? no. Back when it started. Known fact. She brags about her involvement. But what she doesn't tell you is Obama and her armed several different factions. Some of which got defeated by ISIS (thus the arms went to Daesh). Others joined ISIS. All to overthrow Assad. ISIS is also fighting Assad. An enemy of my enemy is my friend even if it was my original enemy? I'm not sure that's how it goes... This shit be known. This is what she wants to continue to do. We couldn't stabilize Iraq while occupying it and she wants to do what we did in Iraq (oust the leader) without sending troops in? That is called arrogance. And a failure to understand when your tactics are wrong... But you know...Americans could give a shit. Syrians aren't Americans. Their lives only partially matter am I right?", ">>{IndomitableServant} : Actively funding people that later turn against you and your interests is a failure in leadership and plan implementation. For all her supposed criticism of Republicans handling warfare and regime change she has committed all the same failures and experiencing the same blowback. It's no different than when America was buddy buddy with Mujahideen and proto-AQ during Regan to defeat the Soviets in Afghanistan. This shit has happened before and Clinton should've known better. The same bullshit happened in Libya as well.", ">>{theplott} : It's really unimaginable that Hillary wouldn't know what and where Aleppo is. On the other hand, we all died laughing when Hillary claimed Nancy Reagan was an advocate for AIDS sufferers in the 80s.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : > had a hand in causing it Not caused by herself. But she played a role. Try not to misrepresent what I say. here's a [source] (http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-33997408) Relative part: > Ford told administration officials years ago they should arm the rebels. If the US doesn't help, he said at the time, extremists will give them money and lure them into their organisations. Those who supported his approach, the Arms for Rebels group, included then-CIA Director David Petraeus, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and most of the foreign-policy establishment in Washington, both Democrat and Republican. Low and behold, they armed them and some of them joined ISIS anyways. And she still thinks this is the way to go. This is her talking point, that and getting rid of Assad. It should also be noted that Nation Security experts almost all agree that Syria would be at least relatively stable with Assad having control.", '>>{IbanezDavy} : > had a hand in causing it... Had a hand does not mean soul causer of the issue. But I\'m going to ignore the strawman. The actual larger issue of Syria started due to a drought. As far as allowing ISIS to take control of large swaths of land, that is almost directly caused by her and Obama arming rebels who would either join or get defeated by ISIS. Thus ISIS acquired their arms. Without Clinton and Obama making this decision and that of universally opposing Assad, ISIS almost definitely wouldn\'t control huge portions of Syria. ISIS wasn\'t a thing until Obama and Clinton (they existed, but as a small faction mostly stationed in Jordan and Lebanon). At the time the argument from the right was "Obama is arming the muslim brotherhood cause he\'s muslim". No Obama was not doing that, and he had good intentions behind it. It was just misguided and led to the rise of ISIS.', ">>{IbanezDavy} : > You are either lying or misinformed about this I'm actually fairly educated on this topic. And we didn't 'lightly' arm them. YOU are misinformed. It started off light. Medical supplies (which I support). But they actually tried training people in Jordan and eventually escalated to heavily arming them. Daesh is a product of Obama and Clinton having a poor grip on Syria. They existed before them, but they gained power through their missteps. Her supporters failing to understand this is the same as GWB supporters failing to understand that invading Iraq was a mistake. Learn from mistakes.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : How about you start supplying some *citations* keyboard warrior. Seriously just do some actual research. We supplied them M72 (Anti-tank rocket launchers) and BGM-71 (Anti tank missile launchers). Are those not 'heavy' to you? It was well beyond just rifles. And that's not even stuff we probably funneled to them through Saudi Arabia. And that's also just the stuff we have footage, pictures or reports of. http://www.businessinsider.com/syrian-rebels-may-have-used-us-made-tow-missiles-to-kill-russian-officers-in-syria-2016-2 http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-arms-idUSKBN0TE1KJ20151125 Denial of these likely events is not even helpful.", ">>{Real_Muthsera} : I'm no great lover of Clinton to say the least. But there is not good answer here. It is really the same question as to what we should do about ISIS. But I think actually the question is how we can help people living under conflict. Aleppo is just a symbol of people suffering under a brutal civil war. And what is our responsibility for fixing that. The question is actually much closer to how do we fix war and get world peace than you might thing. So, what is Clinton to say here? Syria is a Russian ally. As long as we have an antagonistic relationship with Russia this will prevail. But we tried to reconcile with Russia under my tenure as SoS by hitting the reset button. It didn't work. It's much worse than it ever was. So the only way to overcome the Aleppo problem is either to give up. Or to outright beat the Syrian regime. The last one is extremely hard to do as we have to first overcome the ISIS forces with the Syrian regime. Then we have to join the secular and sunni forces that are not completely fanatical along with the kurds in one united front against the Syrian regime. But that will take years of conflict and it is unlikely to succeed as our closest allies in the region are Turkey who are part of NATO and will not support any actions that is going to strengthen the Kurdish positions. And the secular forces are so few that we're unlikely to win over with them alone. Iraq is another problem as they are heavily Shia, and we can't expect them to join in with us to destroy the Shia Syrian regime. The only realistic option to limit the suffering for people who live in Aleppo in the short term horizon. Is to outright give in to the Syrian regime with a deal where they get to stay in power. Which is unlikely as they have the upper hand right now and are on the offensive. Really. How are you going to conway that complicated situation to an average viewer in less than 3 minutes?"], ['>>{Mrpornogoregrind} : Hahaha, next time just pay the monthly insurance. They will replace stolen or lost phones.', ">>{Celestiaaaaa} : Sorry to hear. Mine got stolen a while back too. Better to just get it insured and see if the policy covers theft. In that case you'd pay a small fee at best and in return - another phone.", '>>{Beezure} : If you had find my iphone on it, it will be icloud locked. No jailbreak gets around that. All they have to do is pop out the sim card to keep you from tracking it...(and put in airplane mode)', ">>{UDPGuy} : You can not jailbreak to gain access. If you have find my iPhone on, they won't be able to use it without your password, even with a restore.", '>>{Heyyitsmesusan} : Just be lucky that apple cares about security to implement a feature like FMIP. but hey, good luck with android.', ">>{rekthavoc} : I'm not really sure if I activated it on my phone. But the lock mode is available in my icloud...", '>>{rekthavoc} : I believe thief nowadays know exactly what to do with the phone they stole. Sell it to the black market and have it unlocked.', ">>{currentsc0nvulsive} : If you knew it would be stolen why buy it? Don't blame the iphone, blame the scum that stole it", ">>{DoTheDew} : They can't unlock it. They can sell it for parts though.", '>>{talones} : They cant. Nobody can jailbreak a device without the passcode, and you cant reinstall ios without the icloud password. Yes they probably just turned it off and will probably keep it turned off for a while until they can just blindly sell it to someone. Hopefully it will come back online soon.', '>>{PM_ME_DICK_PICTURES} : No problem. Maybe [this video](https://youtu.be/IpAqoxZvsso) will convince you even further.', '>>{DoTheDew} : No, sorry. Nothing more convincing than a video of a man speaking in Chinese with a couple thousand views? Show me something where lots of others are able to reproduce those results. Show me something where a reputable publication is reporting that iCloud can be bypassed.', ">>{PM_ME_DICK_PICTURES} : This is a reproducible result. Problem is, is expensive as fuck (each tool is close to $1K) and the only way to buy this tool is to go through Chinese sites and dealers. So of course you're not going to hear about it in the western media. Here's [another video](https://youtu.be/2bGb5AOwp44) showing off the cloning functions of the program. Note how it uses a similar tool and the same program.", ">>{DoTheDew} : Those are just scams. If someone had a legit tool to bypass iCloud lock, then they'd make it semi-affordable so that people would actually buy it. I can't find a single reputable source that says any of those methods in those videos are legit.", ">>{PM_ME_DICK_PICTURES} : That's because this tool isn't just for iCloud unlocking. It does a lot of other shit. And if they're the only ones that do it, why would you want to sell your shit cheaply? I'd milk it for as long as I could. And you're right, this isnt legit. It's like a grey area. And again, you're not going to be able to find reputable sources because the western media has never heard of this before because it's from China. But I'm pretty sure some reputable sources have wrote about the storage upgrade."], ['>>{redditblow} : This wall clock syncs with your smart devices to organize your life', ">>{cheedarthese} : Seems rather pointless. I can't really see the benefit of having a clock on the wall when 99% you have your phone next to you. If they made a harry potter style clock where it told you where people were that would be a different matter.", ">>{OfficialShrav} : As creepy as your Harry Potter clock sounds, I don't think it should be that difficult to realize such a product. Just use their Google/swarm/facebook profiles in an app and you would know when Voldemort would strike next!", ">>{AOldUsername} : Yeah, I agree with /u/cheedarthese. This is only useful for not missing Ubers, and really, I don't see why anyone would buy this when you can put a reminder.", '>>{superdupermensch} : If you have one clock, you know what time it is. If you have 2, you can never be sure.', ">>{thejournalizer} : For those saying nay to this, I think there are a few things to keep in mind. These things would probably be adopted more so by older folks who don't actually keep their phone on them 24/7. Better yet, if you have an office and it can harass you until you leave for a meeting. I know a bunch of my meeting notifications on my phone get dismissed and then I totally forget to leave for a meeting. I personally wouldn't buy this though.", ">>{Eazy75217} : I always set my manual clocks on appliances, wall clocks, cars etc. at least 10 mins ahead so I'm not late to anything. So doesn't help my routine at all", '>>{kastid} : This isn\'t for you, this is for everyone around you. If I could get one that showed me when my team would be "in" vs "out" of the office it\'d be great!', '>>{Tangled2} : How does a clock help "organize" something?', '>>{AOldUsername} : I read the article and only recall seeing it being for Uber, but okay. The product though should appeal to as many demographics as they could, because it would make this entire product a moot point.', '>>{lalix89} : I set mine 3 mins faster and it works for me']]

classify and reply

['>>{oranjemania} : Donald Trump has successfully exhausted our ability to be shocked', '>>{oranjemania} : Tl;dr Author Matt Yglesias tweeted: "Trump’s torrent of BS has overwhelmed all our filters and capacity for shock and outrage"', ">>{harekrishnahareram} : I'm subscribed to the 8-bit guy. If you grew up with the NES and Atari, you'll love his vids", '>>{1hobo} : Bernie Sanders calls Donald Trump ‘a fraud’ for U-turn on Wall Street and billionaires inside the White House', ">>{digdug321} : Surely you weren't that gullible to believe him, Bernie?", ">>{MagicComa106} : Bernie is clearly making this statement to the Trump supporters. No shit he didn't believe this.", '>>{Negative_Clank} : Remember when everyone went nuts over Howard Dean yelling Yeehaw? Ya that was huge. Donald Trump alluded to assassinating his rival. Crickets.', '>>{SatanicBloodOrgy} : The one good thing about Trump is that traditional "gaffes" will no longer sink a campaign.', '>>{Dinocrest} : Ay! Been subed since 120k good to see him on Reddit', '>>{MagicComa106} : Would you care to expand on that a bit or just hide in the anonymity of the internet?', ">>{MagicComa106} : I'm waiting for a reasonable, rational explanation of what you mean. I get the feeling I'll be waiting a while.", ">>{Motality} : Said the fraud who stole all the SJW's money and then endorsed a criminal! HA! That old Commie needs to go away already and let us MAGA Baby!", '>>{ChipStarfield} : Clinton alluded to an Obama assassination. Just a reminder that both major party candidates are scum, though arguably in different amounts.', '>>{BenLurking} : I remember putting that gun right up against the TV when I was a kid. Killed a lot of birds in those days.', ">>{PikachuSquarepants} : Dem senator: Trump thinks LGBT stands for 'Let’s Go Back in Time'", '>>{DontDoWhatDonaldDoes} : Old Man Bernie could get twice the turgid erection than the Alternative Tan Man. Sad!', ">>{Djdbdb} : It's a real shame this didn't go further. Would be bad ass with far cry", '>>{SailingSmitty} : I literally built a RetroPie yesterday and was wondering about how the light gun works to see if it would even function with the new TVs. Very interesting stuff.', ">>{SailingSmitty} : Nope, not sure if there are any other options out there but the traditional light gun won't work. They explain why in the video; it has to do with how CRT TVs work vs how modern TVs work.", '>>{freshthrowaway1138} : An interesting side note, the light gun was first developed post WW2 by the US government for pilot training.', ">>{DrinkDice} : I don't see why it wouldn't. Light gun doesn't use beam scan. It just puts a white square for one frame. Modern screens should work imo.", '>>{StupidForehead} : TeeRump is a fraud, everyone knows that. Now if the media will just say how honest TeeRump is, all of a sudden everyone will forget that he is a fraud. Am I right! TeeRump never went bankrupt! Fact 1, Fact 2, Fact 3, one for each time it didnt happen.', '>>{SURPLUS_NiNjA} : If you built one today you might be able to make it work but only for a small set of TVS. Modern tvs have higher latency than crt and its also not consistent between screens. Also the fact that many lcds still emitt some light even when a pixel should be black.', ">>{6heismans} : Yes let's make puns because that's what this issue calls for: jokes. People are going to probably kill themselves because of this administration and all y'all can do is make some shitty pun.", ">>{HandsOnGeek} : Light guns don't work with non-CRT TVs because the timing of the flickering of the target as it is drawn on the screen is how the game determines if the light gun is actually pointed at the target or not. Flicker sensed too soon? Not the target. Flicker sensed too late? Not the target. Only when the flicker of the screen matches the timing of your trigger pull do you hit the target.", ">>{GladThatIsOver} : Trump doesn't have an opinion. Jeff Sessions has an opinion and Trump just plays along.", ">>{sinbad_the_genie} : I was just talking to my brother about the zapper gun. Then my girlfriend asked me if i remember a sinbad genie movie. I haven't been right since.", '>>{lecturermoriarty} : Not even remotely comparable. This equating of the 2 really screams desperation.', ">>{lipsyncforyourlife} : Donald Trump alluded to Cruz's dad being involved with assassinating Kennedy. The man is stupid.", ">>{ImAHackDontLaugh} : I think the difference is between Trump and Bernie was Trump knew the populism promises he was making were all a lie and would never work where as Bernie might've really believed he could've put farmers on the Fed board. Not sure which is scarier to be honest.", ">>{nuclear_faceplant} : The old systems wouldn't work as such. But wouldn't you be able to compensate this if you build a new system? Measure the delay and read the photosensor x µs after trigger is pressed.", ">>{ChipStarfield} : I could compare an apple to an orange. If you're incapable of seeing similarity, maybe you aren't seeing clearly enough. How about the fact that they're both white corporate elites from NYC running for president of a major party? Not even remotely comparable, you say?", ">>{teuobk} : Two big reasons: 1. The original NES zapper uses a modified IR receiver chip on it that has a bandpass filter for about 15 kHz, which is roughly the horizontal refresh rate of PAL and NTSC CRT TVs, i.e., the rate at which the electron beam scans back and forth across the screen as it paints one field. That's one of the ways that the gun knows you're pointing it at a TV instead of, say, a light bulb. LCD TVs don't have an electron beam that scans back and forth, so they don't produce that 15 kHz signal, so the light that they do emit falls outside of the bandpass filter. 2. The Duck Hunt code timing is very tight, and the delay path in LCD TVs screws that up. As a rough outline, the game first debounces the zapper trigger, then paints one black field (not frame, i.e., 16.7 ms, not 33.4 ms), then paints a white rectangle at the location of the first duck for one field (not frame), then paints a white rectangle at the second duck for one field, then resumes the normal display of the meadow scene. The game looks for the black (dark) value to appear at the expected time (to verify that the gun is pointed at the screen) and then whether the white (light) signals appear at the expected times to determine if the zapper was pointed at each duck. Since modern TVs have input lags [of about 10 ms at best](http://www.displaylag.com/display-database/), the time that the relevant data appears on the screen is well after the game expects it to be there, so the game doesn't work. However, there are ways to make this work. First, modify the zapper to use some other signal that happens to be unique to LCD TVs. Second, patch Duck Hunt to allow it to tolerate more delay. Source: I'm working on a project to do exactly this. [Here's a photo of the latest rev of the modified zapper board I made with one of the original boards in the background.](http://i.imgur.com/5IgmftQ.jpg)", '>>{Buttocks} : And a Nazi is anybody that disagrees with you.', '>>{dws4pres} : Gee, Bernie, maybe if you didn\'t tell your cult Clinton was "unqualified" you wouldn\'t have to worry about Trump.', '>>{PurpleProsePoet} : They also both breathe! Is it a conspiracy???', '>>{Ding_Dang_Dongers} : Just point it at a lightbulb, instant 100% accuracy.', '>>{Thedub62} : And outlets like Vox have exhausted our belief that they a news organization and not an extension of the Democratic Party.', ">>{Lost_Traveller_} : If Americans didn't want jokes, then they shouldn't have elected one.", '>>{Xerazal} : This sub is just insane. You guys still haven\'t gotten over the fact that clinton lost. You blame bernie, despite him conceding at the convention and doing everything he could do to get Clinton elected. Yet she still lost. That isn\'t his fault, that\'s hers. She was the one running during the general, she was the one who was supposed to make the case to voters. No one is entitled to our votes, our vote goes to who we choose. She lost key states, many of which voted democrat before in previous elections. Are your heads so far up your asses that you can\'t see that she lost not because of racism, sexism, etc but because people were sick and tired of the same old same old? I\'m not saying trump is great, or even good. He\'s obviously unqualified. But he won key states because 1) most people didn\'t vote, either because they didn\'t care if felt it wouldn\'t matter, and I don\'t blame them. We had 2 of the worst candidates in american history. 2) the people that did vote placed their votes based on what they felt was best. This was an election of voting against someone, not for someone. People that voted against clinton voted for trump because they didn\'t trust her. People that voted against trump voted for clinton because of Trump\'s rhetoric. 3) neither side handled this shit right. Both sides treated people like shit. And that pushed voters into doubling down. There was no discussion going on, just name calling and childish bullshit. You people want to do something? Fight back. Protest. Call your representatives. Stop this blame game. Stop the shit slinging. Only way we are gonna get past this is to stand the fuck up and say no more. I\'ve heard blame go to voters, bernie, third parties, racism, sexism, but never anyone saying "you know what? We could have handled this better. We could have made sure we had the democratic vote. We could have made sure people went out to vote. We could have made a better case." edit: to the people downvoting me, instead of hiding behind an anonymous up or downvote, why not actually respond to what i\'m saying? We need to have a serious discussion about this, without the condescending attitude if you could. We\'ve hit the point of no return with trump in office, various roles in government being given to people that are unqualified or have disqualified themselves but given that power anyways, and a republican led congress. We need to have some serious discussions about what we are going to do, how we\'re going to do it, etc. And the future of the democratic party is also in the balance. During the primaries, you guys talked about clinton being a better choice because she could talk across the isle, so lets see you guys do it by reaching out and talking to people. I\'ll admit i\'m a sanders supporter, but when push came to shove i swallowed my pride and voted clinton, though begrudgingly. I can\'t speak for all sanders supporters, only myself. But I will say that I want to see the democratic party succeed, but only if its willing on being inclusive to everyone, and that needs to start from the bottom up, with people calling themselves democrats dropping this partisan game of excluding people like me who would love to join your party, but is constantly lambasted for speaking out about concerns within the party. I want the democratic party to be DEMOCRATIC, so lets discuss. No more childing shit slinging, no more blame. Lets act like adults. I\'m willing to forgive those for calling me a child, saying I didn\'t know anything, saying I don\'t belong in the democratic party because i\'m not a real democrat, saying my views are "pie in the sky", making assumptions on my character or motivations based on who i supported, making assumptions on my race or views on women.. Yea, i\'ve been called a LOT of things by clinton supporters on here. Lets put that all aside though, and have some serious discussions about what comes next.', ">>{TheHairyManrilla} : Ed Markey's been on a roll with the acronyms.", '>>{dws4pres} : After months of bragging about how they turned entire households against Hillary', ">>{HandsOnGeek} : Read *what* from the photo sensor, precisely? The color of the target? What if your TV is out of color calibration? Flat screen TVs *don't flicker* like Tube TVs do. Without that flicker, the entire light gun mechanism fails.", ">>{-Mountain-King-} : Well, they are comparable, but you're right that Trump's is worse. In case anyone doesn't know, Clinton didn't drop out in the 2008 primary until late because (she implied) she was worried that Obama might he assassinated. To be honest, it was a legitimate fear, and I'm amazed that there haven't been any attempts (at least, any that haven't been able to ve covered up. I'm sure there have been a few that we haven't heard about). Trump, on the other hand, implied that maybe it should happen.", ">>{ParisGreenGretsch} : Ah. Well... I attended Juilliard... I'm a graduate of the Harvard business school. I travel quite extensively. I lived through the Black Plague and had a pretty good time during that. I've seen the EXORCIST ABOUT A HUNDRED AND SIXTY-SEVEN TIMES, AND IT KEEPS GETTING FUNNIER EVERY SINGLE TIME I SEE IT... NOT TO MENTION THE FACT THAT YOU'RE TALKING TO A DEAD GUY... NOW WHAT DO YOU THINK? You think I'm qualified?", '>>{Eurynom0s} : If only the game would have let you shoot that fucking dog.', ">>{MertRekt} : The initial black frame when you pull the trigger makes sure that you aren't aiming at something bright.", '>>{bonestorm5001} : Ugh... except that would be a really good name for a theme gay dance party.', '>>{DmitryDonskoy} : How long did it take Eddie to come up with that one? At least it\'s better than Clinton\'s "Trumped-up Trickle-down."', ">>{Eurynom0s} : I'm pretty sure you'd wind up with something that functions a lot like a Wii controller. Speaking of which, was there some technical reason that the Motion+ couldn't use the IR beam as a second data point to help keep from having to recalibrate it so much? I know the Motion+ was more accurate but the regular one didn't require nearly as much constant recalibration.", ">>{donttalk123} : Why are people shocked at Trump? They should be shocked at the amount of sexism and racism that apparently the general populace is okay with. Day in and out, right in front of their faces. That's what is truly shocking, not some old windbag Trump being racist, that's almost a given.", '>>{CassiopeiaStillLife} : He did not handle this with the gravity it deserves, no.', '>>{TempAlt0} : This exceedingly clever word play confirms my belief that Trump literally wants to massacre gay people. Upvoted!', ">>{NuclearSpaceLegos} : Why are you guys so obsessed with anecdotes? Just because some people you know acted a certain way, doesn't mean it was representative of Bernie supporters at large.", ">>{NuclearSpaceLegos} : Look at who's in the White House and Congress. Hillary and her supporters already destoyed the Democratic Party.", ">>{dws4pres} : We did the only rational thing to stop this, we voted for Hillary. Most of you claim that as well, but we know you're full of shit.", ">>{Eurynom0s} : As if just responded to someone else, I'm pretty sure you'd basically wind up with a Wii controller.", ">>{base1234567} : My interpretation is not that she feared Obama's assassination. She just used Kennedy's assassination and her husbands 92' campaign as historical examples as to why she continue to campaign into June. She didn't fear his assassination, she just pulled a bad example and then apologized for it. Trump on the other hand....", '>>{trimeta} : For that matter, Mitt Romney\'s "47%" and "binders full of women" comments are tame compared to what Trump says in any given 7-day period.', ">>{qui_moi} : I just don't understand what they think to gain by this.", ">>{Full_0f_Shit} : I could have sworn that as a kid I got headaches by looking down the barrel of the gun and pulling the trigger but seeing how the gun is just passive I'm not so sure. Did I or didn't I get headaches????", ">>{NuclearSpaceLegos} : I voted for Hillary as well, in a swing state no less. However, if you voted for Hillary in the primaries, you played a part in giving us President Trump. >Most of you claim that as well, Well yes, because most Bernie supporters did vote for Hillary. >but we know you're full of shit. Nice alternative fact there bud, but like i said, most Bernie supporters voted for Hillary.", '>>{fragment137} : I\'ve seriously considered the possibility that Trump was strategically put in place so that everyone WOULD be desensitized to all this bullshit, so that lesser (but still outrageous) statements would be overlooked or excused as "not as bad as trump"', ">>{creesch} : It isn't really passive in regards to what the screen does, as you can see in the video. No clue if that could cause your headaches.", ">>{mutatoes} : i guess he just made that so he has a reason to mass murder LGBT's. what a complete fuckup.", '>>{dws4pres} : Most Bernie supporters *said* they voted for Hillary.', '>>{thejoshu} : Because any criticism of Trump means "Democrat plant!" to Trump supporters.', '>>{yuork375} : One of the unsung heroes of Youtube. Almost every video he produces acclaim the accomplishments of the early computer heroes', '>>{aegist1} : You never made it to the [bonus round.](https://youtu.be/Z0mx9dO3BxI)', '>>{microferret} : Man, the comments on that article are pretty sad.', ">>{redditorkun} : We're going to go beyond the past, back when mental patients were either bullied into submission or put into a mental ward. Before societal degradation began and everyone actually worked for the greater good of the nation. Too many filthy sodomites in our country right now. President Trump needs to rid this nation of their ilk. Sickening sickening", ">>{Negative_Clank} : People are yelling about how Hillary won't release speech transcripts, but they had to actually secretly record Romney to catch him saying such stupid things. Maybe he should've released his transcripts. He released his taxes at least.", ">>{ajdewolf} : Yeah, didn't the SAGE computer from the 1950s use light pens?", '>>{NoFucksGiver} : i am not confident that trump numbed people enough for this to be the case in the future. this will happen only with very populist candidates with a crazy faithfull bunch of supporters', '>>{DrKrills} : Maybe, or maybe Donald is a bigot like the company he keeps.', '>>{NuclearSpaceLegos} : And you think that they voted otherwise based on your gut feeling?', '>>{Ding_Dang_Dongers} : Really? I recall it working when I still had my NES. Granted, this was 1991, I was 4, and it was stolen around the launch of SNES, which I got for Christmas shortly after, which probably overshadowed a lot of earlier gaming memories. That is a horrible run-on anecdote, my bad.', '>>{redditorkun} : A sane person in an insane world will always appear insane', '>>{ilikepiesthatlookgay} : Shooting at the reflection in the mirror made it almost impossible to miss.', '>>{shadowokker} : You don\'t appear insane, you appear to be a relic, left behind and clinging to flawed ideals. Together we can all work for a greater good the world over, but your version of that is a self contradiction because your "together" is exclusive.', ">>{NuclearSpaceLegos} : So I guess it's feels over reals for you?", '>>{HoneyBucketsOfOats} : What in the FUCK! Player two can control the fucking duck????? MY ENTIRE CHILDHOOD WAS A LIE!!!!', '>>{SailingSmitty} : This is awesome! I hope that your project succeeds!', '>>{orange4boy} : Although he has cemented our ability to recognize a narcissistic sociopath so we have that going for us.', '>>{redditorkun} : A government is supposed to play a key role in maintaining a high moral standard, keeping things clean and respectable, promoting a strong sense of honor, and preventing the dissemination of depraved filth which corrupts society.', ">>{shadowokker} : What's moral about bullying and viewing people as filth? Your rhetoric doesn't sound any better than a nazi's, dude. That's pretty low.", ">>{redditorkun} : >What's moral about bullying and viewing people as filth? Morality seeks the maintenance of society. It is moral once you evaluate the long term impacts on the greatest number of people. >Your rhetoric doesn't sound any better than a nazi's Close. I'm a fascist", ">>{Full_0f_Shit} : Well passive in a sense that nothing is being sent out the barrel but that it's just watching for light inside the barrel. Might be the headaches were just from the flashes of the game and being too close to the screen (to cheat). Boredom leading to light gun head shots to myself were not the cause all along maybe but my 10 yo mind made it out to be.", ">>{fartbox_fingerbanger} : Can all of this be applied to Hogan's Alley?", '>>{TheMacMan} : My brother stepped on our Zapper gun and broke the barrel off. Then all you had to do was point it in the direction of the TV, pull the trigger, and everything died. At first it was cool getting to level 100 of Duck Hunt. Then it became incredibly boring.', '>>{Thedub62} : Please the media is openly supporting Hilary. They are venting her in any way shape or form.', ">>{manofpuck} : Let's just see who can out lie one another. That there friends is our winner!", ">>{shadowokker} : Well then there's no point having a conversation then really. I do hope to see your way of thinking take less prevalence in the future.", '>>{ParisGreenGretsch} : Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice [Start @2:00](https://youtu.be/WRDJN23YZmw)', '>>{redditorkun} : Fascism and National Socialism is the future. I remember reading an article that claimed Generation Z will be the most right wing since the 1920s', ">>{teuobk} : The zapper changes should be applicable, but the code is an open question. I've been focusing so much on Duck Hunt that I don't have a copy of Hogan's Alley to test. I think I shall acquire one.", ">>{JackOCat} : Looks like one of Trump's conned marks is getting a bit defensive.", ">>{CrypticQuery} : Hogan's Alley was my favorite of the lightgun games. Operation Wolf was pretty good too IIRC.", '>>{ChestyLaRue83} : Yet people still support him. He literally talk out of his ass and people just lap it up.', '>>{CouchRadish} : >They should be shocked at the amount of sexism and racism that apparently the general populace is okay with. That\'s less of "general populace being okay with sexism and racism" and more of "a small very liberal subsection of people setting and constantly moving the goalposts on what\'s racist and sexist, annoying the general populace". For gods sake, they claimed that criticizing Clinton was sexist!', '>>{CouchRadish} : Trump on the other hand brought up the very persuasive voting block that is the NRA and the 2nd amendment single-issues. But no, it was obviously about assassinating Clinton. Warren\'s "I wish Trump would just disappear" is more of a threat than what he said.', '>>{shadowokker} : The children are our future, so says Randy Watson.', ">>{base1234567} : If that's what trump meant, then i don't have a problem with that. I am just saying that its not comparable. And Clinton apologized while Trump blamed the media. Clinton could have blamed the media too. Every politician in the world can blame the media for their poor image. As for Warren quote, she is answering the question as to wether she likes fighting with trump: >No. No. You’re absolutely wrong about that. I wish Donald Trump would just disappear. Close down his Twitter account, drop out of the race and I’d be the happiest girl on the face of this Earth. I dont see how that more threatening. But if I'm not convincing then I give up.", ">>{rumborak} : He also turned me onto TechMoan's channel. His retro-audio vids are fantastic.", '>>{lilmul123} : I think this is something kids swear they remember being able to do, and the mere fact that they keep repeating it has caused a Mandela Effect. I have never seen it performed in person or online, and indeed, the way in which the zapper works (and how the video describes) would seem to prevent this from working.', ">>{RandExt} : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_threats_against_Barack_Obama There were plenty, they just don't publicize it to avoid copycat attempts.", ">>{Rijjle} : This is neat. When I had my first interview for my current job one of the technical questions I was asked was 'how does the NES Zapper work?' I wasn't expected to know how it worked before the interview, the question is more about problem solving to see if I can figure it out. It was a fun question.", ">>{hazenthephysicist} : If 'What is Aleppo?' had come from Trump during the town hall, it would barely crack the top ten most shocking things he said in that half-hour.", ">>{-Mountain-King-} : Right, but I'm surprised there haven't been any that they weren't able to keep from getting publicised.", '>>{ThankYouRayDallio} : >Trump on the other hand brought up the very persuasive voting block that is the NRA and the 2nd amendment single-issues. And then in the next sentence said how awful it would be if they voted like that?', ">>{TheSubtleSaiyan} : Nope, media will just have a double standard: Easy mode for Trump, hard on everyone else. See Gary Johnson's Aleppo gaffe and the aggressive attempts at discrediting his candidacy all together, while going easy on Trump for far more egregious foolishness.", '>>{clwu} : I remember having this game but not the gun. No idea what I was doing.', '>>{loo_kazoo} : **Light Pen**: The CRT displays one pixel at a time. The light pen locates the position on the screen by detecting when the pixel is displayed. **Zapper Gun**: When shooting, the screen goes black for one frame, after which it displays a white box where the target was. The gun simply checks for light during the frame where a white box should be displayed.', ">>{Ding_Dang_Dongers} : That's a strong possibility, it was close to 26 years ago.", ">>{Mknowl} : You can build them so that they work but you have to have software built in so that you can calibrate it to each TV set. CRT's had no image pre processing so you saw what you got as the signal was sent. LCD have preprocessing and depending on the chips and circuitry of the board in the TV it will be a different amount of time. Thats why some TV's have a game function, it limits the preprocessing that happens to try to make the latency of what the TV puts out and what comes up on the TV as small as possible. But even still there is some. I used to play most single player games on my LCD TV as it didnt matter much but when going online I would move it to my CRT TV which helped me have a slight advantage as there was a serious delay on my LCD. Each TV model could be slightly different and when you're talking millisecond sampling you cant make it universal, so it would need to be calibrated for each TV and even then, if you change some setting on the TV it could screw it up all over again and need to be recalibrated.", '>>{ricer333} : Same here, my entire life I never had a clue', ">>{MaceZilla} : I almost wouldn't believe it if I didn't see it. I mean, of all the hours we put into that game, it seems like me or one of my friends would have messed around with the controller while waiting our turn to play next.", ">>{jonnubroth} : How light penis and light guns.. was what I thought I read and gave me a well deserved double take. What does that say about me?? This doesn't work with new tvs tho :(", '>>{Pokemonjpups} : I remember when he had 20, 000 subs and now he is at 300, 000! Edit: a word', ">>{NosVemos} : For the lazy, [here's where the Duck Hunt Gun Zapper part begins.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPoit_51ac4)", '>>{mags87} : So at some point, no one will ever be able to play an original Duck Hunt cartridge because of the lack of functional CRT displays.', '>>{wh0surpaddy} : Me & a friend figured out you could play duck hunt facing the other way looking into a mirror.', '>>{MrChombo} : Total placebo effect. Nothing is emitted from the Zapper.', '>>{leonardo_pothead} : Please put up a DIY guide on how to mod the gun. Also put out a patched ROM! It would be amazing if you would take orders for the modded gun too.', '>>{PeanutButter707} : Most still work fone, just not on newer TVs', '>>{LAN_of_the_free} : Can light guns work with a TN monitor, since their response times are <1ms?', ">>{DragonTamerMCT} : Love him, I just wish he didn't seem so depressed all the time. Great videos though.", '>>{redredditredreddit} : He makes quality content and delivers it in a palatable manner.', '>>{Figgaroni} : Threw out all of my old game systems about 10 years ago, what a mistake smh!', ">>{dallasdude} : I have a CRT. Still doesn't work because it's a flat screen CRT not curved.", ">>{121gigawhatevs} : I know right? I've seen this guys videos so many times. His other channel is great too - 8 bit keys", '>>{southpaws2046} : The way this was explained was incredibly simple for anyone to understand. Kudos to the team for making magic seem like everyday science.', ">>{Paypay1} : I mean, I'm not sure about RetroPie supporting it as a lightgun, but I know that you could use a wiimote", '>>{ausvegguyk} : ah, the old [gun-a-roo](https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/5lgb54/warning_game_of_thrones_spoilers/dbvs0t5/)', ">>{guy_who_knows_cars} : He said that it's because of the signal processing that LCDs do, but many LCDs don't do any kind of major signal processing. LCDs are simply too slow for the light gun to work, because they rely on the physical movement of a crystal in order to block out the light coming from the backlight.", '>>{jyfnljk} : I swear to god that said "Light Penis"', '>>{kageurufu} : Point at TV, pulse a few times, measure delay. Not epileptic friendly though. I think the latest rock band had something like this to measure the delay.', '>>{HandsOnGeek} : Interesting. So, have the game system blink the target after you pull the trigger. And look for the blink with the light gun. That might just work. But, yes would be unfriendly to epileptic folks.', ">>{Laytheron} : Story time! A few days back, I switched my NES to a newer LCD TV. However, Duck Hunt wouldn't work. Looked it up, found my problem. Then, spent an hour switching it back to the old monstrosity. Screwing around with lots of cables isn't fun when you forget where they go. NES is back on cathode-ray TV, and I played the hell out of Duck Hunt.", ">>{ZapperDubs} : I'm happy because my username. (Sentence fragment I know)", '>>{Ki-Gr-Un} : Lol "built" You literally just downloaded RetroPie to a microsd card.', '>>{Speedswiper} : That is not at all how you do switcharoo.', '>>{drunkladyhitme} : This is what the world gets for not reading the manual', ">>{flicker5} : If you turned the TV's brightness control all the way up, you didn't even have to aim.", '>>{TepidFlounder90} : I read it as "Low Light Penis Work" I was very confused', '>>{I_munch_on_socks} : Why is it when I google something it end up on reddit the very next week?', ">>{Full_0f_Shit} : Turns out I was born with it! It wasn't Maybelline at all!"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{oranjemania} : Donald Trump has successfully exhausted our ability to be shocked', '>>{oranjemania} : Tl;dr Author Matt Yglesias tweeted: "Trump’s torrent of BS has overwhelmed all our filters and capacity for shock and outrage"', '>>{Negative_Clank} : Remember when everyone went nuts over Howard Dean yelling Yeehaw? Ya that was huge. Donald Trump alluded to assassinating his rival. Crickets.', '>>{SatanicBloodOrgy} : The one good thing about Trump is that traditional "gaffes" will no longer sink a campaign.', '>>{ChipStarfield} : Clinton alluded to an Obama assassination. Just a reminder that both major party candidates are scum, though arguably in different amounts.', '>>{lecturermoriarty} : Not even remotely comparable. This equating of the 2 really screams desperation.', ">>{lipsyncforyourlife} : Donald Trump alluded to Cruz's dad being involved with assassinating Kennedy. The man is stupid.", ">>{ChipStarfield} : I could compare an apple to an orange. If you're incapable of seeing similarity, maybe you aren't seeing clearly enough. How about the fact that they're both white corporate elites from NYC running for president of a major party? Not even remotely comparable, you say?", '>>{PurpleProsePoet} : They also both breathe! Is it a conspiracy???', '>>{Thedub62} : And outlets like Vox have exhausted our belief that they a news organization and not an extension of the Democratic Party.', ">>{-Mountain-King-} : Well, they are comparable, but you're right that Trump's is worse. In case anyone doesn't know, Clinton didn't drop out in the 2008 primary until late because (she implied) she was worried that Obama might he assassinated. To be honest, it was a legitimate fear, and I'm amazed that there haven't been any attempts (at least, any that haven't been able to ve covered up. I'm sure there have been a few that we haven't heard about). Trump, on the other hand, implied that maybe it should happen.", ">>{ParisGreenGretsch} : Ah. Well... I attended Juilliard... I'm a graduate of the Harvard business school. I travel quite extensively. I lived through the Black Plague and had a pretty good time during that. I've seen the EXORCIST ABOUT A HUNDRED AND SIXTY-SEVEN TIMES, AND IT KEEPS GETTING FUNNIER EVERY SINGLE TIME I SEE IT... NOT TO MENTION THE FACT THAT YOU'RE TALKING TO A DEAD GUY... NOW WHAT DO YOU THINK? You think I'm qualified?", ">>{donttalk123} : Why are people shocked at Trump? They should be shocked at the amount of sexism and racism that apparently the general populace is okay with. Day in and out, right in front of their faces. That's what is truly shocking, not some old windbag Trump being racist, that's almost a given.", ">>{base1234567} : My interpretation is not that she feared Obama's assassination. She just used Kennedy's assassination and her husbands 92' campaign as historical examples as to why she continue to campaign into June. She didn't fear his assassination, she just pulled a bad example and then apologized for it. Trump on the other hand....", '>>{trimeta} : For that matter, Mitt Romney\'s "47%" and "binders full of women" comments are tame compared to what Trump says in any given 7-day period.', '>>{fragment137} : I\'ve seriously considered the possibility that Trump was strategically put in place so that everyone WOULD be desensitized to all this bullshit, so that lesser (but still outrageous) statements would be overlooked or excused as "not as bad as trump"', '>>{thejoshu} : Because any criticism of Trump means "Democrat plant!" to Trump supporters.', ">>{Negative_Clank} : People are yelling about how Hillary won't release speech transcripts, but they had to actually secretly record Romney to catch him saying such stupid things. Maybe he should've released his transcripts. He released his taxes at least.", '>>{NoFucksGiver} : i am not confident that trump numbed people enough for this to be the case in the future. this will happen only with very populist candidates with a crazy faithfull bunch of supporters', '>>{orange4boy} : Although he has cemented our ability to recognize a narcissistic sociopath so we have that going for us.', '>>{Thedub62} : Please the media is openly supporting Hilary. They are venting her in any way shape or form.', ">>{manofpuck} : Let's just see who can out lie one another. That there friends is our winner!", '>>{ParisGreenGretsch} : Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice [Start @2:00](https://youtu.be/WRDJN23YZmw)', ">>{JackOCat} : Looks like one of Trump's conned marks is getting a bit defensive.", '>>{ChestyLaRue83} : Yet people still support him. He literally talk out of his ass and people just lap it up.', '>>{CouchRadish} : >They should be shocked at the amount of sexism and racism that apparently the general populace is okay with. That\'s less of "general populace being okay with sexism and racism" and more of "a small very liberal subsection of people setting and constantly moving the goalposts on what\'s racist and sexist, annoying the general populace". For gods sake, they claimed that criticizing Clinton was sexist!', '>>{CouchRadish} : Trump on the other hand brought up the very persuasive voting block that is the NRA and the 2nd amendment single-issues. But no, it was obviously about assassinating Clinton. Warren\'s "I wish Trump would just disappear" is more of a threat than what he said.', ">>{base1234567} : If that's what trump meant, then i don't have a problem with that. I am just saying that its not comparable. And Clinton apologized while Trump blamed the media. Clinton could have blamed the media too. Every politician in the world can blame the media for their poor image. As for Warren quote, she is answering the question as to wether she likes fighting with trump: >No. No. You’re absolutely wrong about that. I wish Donald Trump would just disappear. Close down his Twitter account, drop out of the race and I’d be the happiest girl on the face of this Earth. I dont see how that more threatening. But if I'm not convincing then I give up.", ">>{RandExt} : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_threats_against_Barack_Obama There were plenty, they just don't publicize it to avoid copycat attempts.", ">>{hazenthephysicist} : If 'What is Aleppo?' had come from Trump during the town hall, it would barely crack the top ten most shocking things he said in that half-hour.", ">>{-Mountain-King-} : Right, but I'm surprised there haven't been any that they weren't able to keep from getting publicised.", '>>{ThankYouRayDallio} : >Trump on the other hand brought up the very persuasive voting block that is the NRA and the 2nd amendment single-issues. And then in the next sentence said how awful it would be if they voted like that?', ">>{TheSubtleSaiyan} : Nope, media will just have a double standard: Easy mode for Trump, hard on everyone else. See Gary Johnson's Aleppo gaffe and the aggressive attempts at discrediting his candidacy all together, while going easy on Trump for far more egregious foolishness."], [">>{harekrishnahareram} : I'm subscribed to the 8-bit guy. If you grew up with the NES and Atari, you'll love his vids", '>>{Dinocrest} : Ay! Been subed since 120k good to see him on Reddit', '>>{BenLurking} : I remember putting that gun right up against the TV when I was a kid. Killed a lot of birds in those days.', ">>{Djdbdb} : It's a real shame this didn't go further. Would be bad ass with far cry", '>>{SailingSmitty} : I literally built a RetroPie yesterday and was wondering about how the light gun works to see if it would even function with the new TVs. Very interesting stuff.', ">>{SailingSmitty} : Nope, not sure if there are any other options out there but the traditional light gun won't work. They explain why in the video; it has to do with how CRT TVs work vs how modern TVs work.", '>>{freshthrowaway1138} : An interesting side note, the light gun was first developed post WW2 by the US government for pilot training.', ">>{DrinkDice} : I don't see why it wouldn't. Light gun doesn't use beam scan. It just puts a white square for one frame. Modern screens should work imo.", '>>{SURPLUS_NiNjA} : If you built one today you might be able to make it work but only for a small set of TVS. Modern tvs have higher latency than crt and its also not consistent between screens. Also the fact that many lcds still emitt some light even when a pixel should be black.', ">>{HandsOnGeek} : Light guns don't work with non-CRT TVs because the timing of the flickering of the target as it is drawn on the screen is how the game determines if the light gun is actually pointed at the target or not. Flicker sensed too soon? Not the target. Flicker sensed too late? Not the target. Only when the flicker of the screen matches the timing of your trigger pull do you hit the target.", ">>{sinbad_the_genie} : I was just talking to my brother about the zapper gun. Then my girlfriend asked me if i remember a sinbad genie movie. I haven't been right since.", ">>{nuclear_faceplant} : The old systems wouldn't work as such. But wouldn't you be able to compensate this if you build a new system? Measure the delay and read the photosensor x µs after trigger is pressed.", ">>{teuobk} : Two big reasons: 1. The original NES zapper uses a modified IR receiver chip on it that has a bandpass filter for about 15 kHz, which is roughly the horizontal refresh rate of PAL and NTSC CRT TVs, i.e., the rate at which the electron beam scans back and forth across the screen as it paints one field. That's one of the ways that the gun knows you're pointing it at a TV instead of, say, a light bulb. LCD TVs don't have an electron beam that scans back and forth, so they don't produce that 15 kHz signal, so the light that they do emit falls outside of the bandpass filter. 2. The Duck Hunt code timing is very tight, and the delay path in LCD TVs screws that up. As a rough outline, the game first debounces the zapper trigger, then paints one black field (not frame, i.e., 16.7 ms, not 33.4 ms), then paints a white rectangle at the location of the first duck for one field (not frame), then paints a white rectangle at the second duck for one field, then resumes the normal display of the meadow scene. The game looks for the black (dark) value to appear at the expected time (to verify that the gun is pointed at the screen) and then whether the white (light) signals appear at the expected times to determine if the zapper was pointed at each duck. Since modern TVs have input lags [of about 10 ms at best](http://www.displaylag.com/display-database/), the time that the relevant data appears on the screen is well after the game expects it to be there, so the game doesn't work. However, there are ways to make this work. First, modify the zapper to use some other signal that happens to be unique to LCD TVs. Second, patch Duck Hunt to allow it to tolerate more delay. Source: I'm working on a project to do exactly this. [Here's a photo of the latest rev of the modified zapper board I made with one of the original boards in the background.](http://i.imgur.com/5IgmftQ.jpg)", '>>{Ding_Dang_Dongers} : Just point it at a lightbulb, instant 100% accuracy.', ">>{HandsOnGeek} : Read *what* from the photo sensor, precisely? The color of the target? What if your TV is out of color calibration? Flat screen TVs *don't flicker* like Tube TVs do. Without that flicker, the entire light gun mechanism fails.", '>>{Eurynom0s} : If only the game would have let you shoot that fucking dog.', ">>{MertRekt} : The initial black frame when you pull the trigger makes sure that you aren't aiming at something bright.", ">>{Eurynom0s} : I'm pretty sure you'd wind up with something that functions a lot like a Wii controller. Speaking of which, was there some technical reason that the Motion+ couldn't use the IR beam as a second data point to help keep from having to recalibrate it so much? I know the Motion+ was more accurate but the regular one didn't require nearly as much constant recalibration.", ">>{Eurynom0s} : As if just responded to someone else, I'm pretty sure you'd basically wind up with a Wii controller.", ">>{Full_0f_Shit} : I could have sworn that as a kid I got headaches by looking down the barrel of the gun and pulling the trigger but seeing how the gun is just passive I'm not so sure. Did I or didn't I get headaches????", ">>{creesch} : It isn't really passive in regards to what the screen does, as you can see in the video. No clue if that could cause your headaches.", '>>{yuork375} : One of the unsung heroes of Youtube. Almost every video he produces acclaim the accomplishments of the early computer heroes', '>>{aegist1} : You never made it to the [bonus round.](https://youtu.be/Z0mx9dO3BxI)', ">>{ajdewolf} : Yeah, didn't the SAGE computer from the 1950s use light pens?", '>>{Ding_Dang_Dongers} : Really? I recall it working when I still had my NES. Granted, this was 1991, I was 4, and it was stolen around the launch of SNES, which I got for Christmas shortly after, which probably overshadowed a lot of earlier gaming memories. That is a horrible run-on anecdote, my bad.', '>>{ilikepiesthatlookgay} : Shooting at the reflection in the mirror made it almost impossible to miss.', '>>{HoneyBucketsOfOats} : What in the FUCK! Player two can control the fucking duck????? MY ENTIRE CHILDHOOD WAS A LIE!!!!', '>>{SailingSmitty} : This is awesome! I hope that your project succeeds!', ">>{Full_0f_Shit} : Well passive in a sense that nothing is being sent out the barrel but that it's just watching for light inside the barrel. Might be the headaches were just from the flashes of the game and being too close to the screen (to cheat). Boredom leading to light gun head shots to myself were not the cause all along maybe but my 10 yo mind made it out to be.", ">>{fartbox_fingerbanger} : Can all of this be applied to Hogan's Alley?", '>>{TheMacMan} : My brother stepped on our Zapper gun and broke the barrel off. Then all you had to do was point it in the direction of the TV, pull the trigger, and everything died. At first it was cool getting to level 100 of Duck Hunt. Then it became incredibly boring.', ">>{teuobk} : The zapper changes should be applicable, but the code is an open question. I've been focusing so much on Duck Hunt that I don't have a copy of Hogan's Alley to test. I think I shall acquire one.", ">>{CrypticQuery} : Hogan's Alley was my favorite of the lightgun games. Operation Wolf was pretty good too IIRC.", ">>{rumborak} : He also turned me onto TechMoan's channel. His retro-audio vids are fantastic.", '>>{lilmul123} : I think this is something kids swear they remember being able to do, and the mere fact that they keep repeating it has caused a Mandela Effect. I have never seen it performed in person or online, and indeed, the way in which the zapper works (and how the video describes) would seem to prevent this from working.', ">>{Rijjle} : This is neat. When I had my first interview for my current job one of the technical questions I was asked was 'how does the NES Zapper work?' I wasn't expected to know how it worked before the interview, the question is more about problem solving to see if I can figure it out. It was a fun question.", '>>{clwu} : I remember having this game but not the gun. No idea what I was doing.', '>>{loo_kazoo} : **Light Pen**: The CRT displays one pixel at a time. The light pen locates the position on the screen by detecting when the pixel is displayed. **Zapper Gun**: When shooting, the screen goes black for one frame, after which it displays a white box where the target was. The gun simply checks for light during the frame where a white box should be displayed.', ">>{Ding_Dang_Dongers} : That's a strong possibility, it was close to 26 years ago.", ">>{Mknowl} : You can build them so that they work but you have to have software built in so that you can calibrate it to each TV set. CRT's had no image pre processing so you saw what you got as the signal was sent. LCD have preprocessing and depending on the chips and circuitry of the board in the TV it will be a different amount of time. Thats why some TV's have a game function, it limits the preprocessing that happens to try to make the latency of what the TV puts out and what comes up on the TV as small as possible. But even still there is some. I used to play most single player games on my LCD TV as it didnt matter much but when going online I would move it to my CRT TV which helped me have a slight advantage as there was a serious delay on my LCD. Each TV model could be slightly different and when you're talking millisecond sampling you cant make it universal, so it would need to be calibrated for each TV and even then, if you change some setting on the TV it could screw it up all over again and need to be recalibrated.", '>>{ricer333} : Same here, my entire life I never had a clue', ">>{MaceZilla} : I almost wouldn't believe it if I didn't see it. I mean, of all the hours we put into that game, it seems like me or one of my friends would have messed around with the controller while waiting our turn to play next.", ">>{jonnubroth} : How light penis and light guns.. was what I thought I read and gave me a well deserved double take. What does that say about me?? This doesn't work with new tvs tho :(", '>>{Pokemonjpups} : I remember when he had 20, 000 subs and now he is at 300, 000! Edit: a word', ">>{NosVemos} : For the lazy, [here's where the Duck Hunt Gun Zapper part begins.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPoit_51ac4)", '>>{mags87} : So at some point, no one will ever be able to play an original Duck Hunt cartridge because of the lack of functional CRT displays.', '>>{wh0surpaddy} : Me & a friend figured out you could play duck hunt facing the other way looking into a mirror.', '>>{MrChombo} : Total placebo effect. Nothing is emitted from the Zapper.', '>>{leonardo_pothead} : Please put up a DIY guide on how to mod the gun. Also put out a patched ROM! It would be amazing if you would take orders for the modded gun too.', '>>{PeanutButter707} : Most still work fone, just not on newer TVs', '>>{LAN_of_the_free} : Can light guns work with a TN monitor, since their response times are <1ms?', ">>{DragonTamerMCT} : Love him, I just wish he didn't seem so depressed all the time. Great videos though.", '>>{redredditredreddit} : He makes quality content and delivers it in a palatable manner.', '>>{Figgaroni} : Threw out all of my old game systems about 10 years ago, what a mistake smh!', ">>{dallasdude} : I have a CRT. Still doesn't work because it's a flat screen CRT not curved.", ">>{121gigawhatevs} : I know right? I've seen this guys videos so many times. His other channel is great too - 8 bit keys", '>>{southpaws2046} : The way this was explained was incredibly simple for anyone to understand. Kudos to the team for making magic seem like everyday science.', ">>{Paypay1} : I mean, I'm not sure about RetroPie supporting it as a lightgun, but I know that you could use a wiimote", '>>{ausvegguyk} : ah, the old [gun-a-roo](https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/5lgb54/warning_game_of_thrones_spoilers/dbvs0t5/)', ">>{guy_who_knows_cars} : He said that it's because of the signal processing that LCDs do, but many LCDs don't do any kind of major signal processing. LCDs are simply too slow for the light gun to work, because they rely on the physical movement of a crystal in order to block out the light coming from the backlight.", '>>{jyfnljk} : I swear to god that said "Light Penis"', '>>{kageurufu} : Point at TV, pulse a few times, measure delay. Not epileptic friendly though. I think the latest rock band had something like this to measure the delay.', '>>{HandsOnGeek} : Interesting. So, have the game system blink the target after you pull the trigger. And look for the blink with the light gun. That might just work. But, yes would be unfriendly to epileptic folks.', ">>{Laytheron} : Story time! A few days back, I switched my NES to a newer LCD TV. However, Duck Hunt wouldn't work. Looked it up, found my problem. Then, spent an hour switching it back to the old monstrosity. Screwing around with lots of cables isn't fun when you forget where they go. NES is back on cathode-ray TV, and I played the hell out of Duck Hunt.", ">>{ZapperDubs} : I'm happy because my username. (Sentence fragment I know)", '>>{Ki-Gr-Un} : Lol "built" You literally just downloaded RetroPie to a microsd card.', '>>{Speedswiper} : That is not at all how you do switcharoo.', '>>{drunkladyhitme} : This is what the world gets for not reading the manual', ">>{flicker5} : If you turned the TV's brightness control all the way up, you didn't even have to aim.", '>>{TepidFlounder90} : I read it as "Low Light Penis Work" I was very confused', '>>{I_munch_on_socks} : Why is it when I google something it end up on reddit the very next week?', ">>{Full_0f_Shit} : Turns out I was born with it! It wasn't Maybelline at all!"], ['>>{1hobo} : Bernie Sanders calls Donald Trump ‘a fraud’ for U-turn on Wall Street and billionaires inside the White House', ">>{digdug321} : Surely you weren't that gullible to believe him, Bernie?", ">>{MagicComa106} : Bernie is clearly making this statement to the Trump supporters. No shit he didn't believe this.", '>>{MagicComa106} : Would you care to expand on that a bit or just hide in the anonymity of the internet?', ">>{MagicComa106} : I'm waiting for a reasonable, rational explanation of what you mean. I get the feeling I'll be waiting a while.", ">>{Motality} : Said the fraud who stole all the SJW's money and then endorsed a criminal! HA! That old Commie needs to go away already and let us MAGA Baby!", '>>{DontDoWhatDonaldDoes} : Old Man Bernie could get twice the turgid erection than the Alternative Tan Man. Sad!', '>>{StupidForehead} : TeeRump is a fraud, everyone knows that. Now if the media will just say how honest TeeRump is, all of a sudden everyone will forget that he is a fraud. Am I right! TeeRump never went bankrupt! Fact 1, Fact 2, Fact 3, one for each time it didnt happen.', ">>{ImAHackDontLaugh} : I think the difference is between Trump and Bernie was Trump knew the populism promises he was making were all a lie and would never work where as Bernie might've really believed he could've put farmers on the Fed board. Not sure which is scarier to be honest.", '>>{Buttocks} : And a Nazi is anybody that disagrees with you.', '>>{dws4pres} : Gee, Bernie, maybe if you didn\'t tell your cult Clinton was "unqualified" you wouldn\'t have to worry about Trump.', '>>{Xerazal} : This sub is just insane. You guys still haven\'t gotten over the fact that clinton lost. You blame bernie, despite him conceding at the convention and doing everything he could do to get Clinton elected. Yet she still lost. That isn\'t his fault, that\'s hers. She was the one running during the general, she was the one who was supposed to make the case to voters. No one is entitled to our votes, our vote goes to who we choose. She lost key states, many of which voted democrat before in previous elections. Are your heads so far up your asses that you can\'t see that she lost not because of racism, sexism, etc but because people were sick and tired of the same old same old? I\'m not saying trump is great, or even good. He\'s obviously unqualified. But he won key states because 1) most people didn\'t vote, either because they didn\'t care if felt it wouldn\'t matter, and I don\'t blame them. We had 2 of the worst candidates in american history. 2) the people that did vote placed their votes based on what they felt was best. This was an election of voting against someone, not for someone. People that voted against clinton voted for trump because they didn\'t trust her. People that voted against trump voted for clinton because of Trump\'s rhetoric. 3) neither side handled this shit right. Both sides treated people like shit. And that pushed voters into doubling down. There was no discussion going on, just name calling and childish bullshit. You people want to do something? Fight back. Protest. Call your representatives. Stop this blame game. Stop the shit slinging. Only way we are gonna get past this is to stand the fuck up and say no more. I\'ve heard blame go to voters, bernie, third parties, racism, sexism, but never anyone saying "you know what? We could have handled this better. We could have made sure we had the democratic vote. We could have made sure people went out to vote. We could have made a better case." edit: to the people downvoting me, instead of hiding behind an anonymous up or downvote, why not actually respond to what i\'m saying? We need to have a serious discussion about this, without the condescending attitude if you could. We\'ve hit the point of no return with trump in office, various roles in government being given to people that are unqualified or have disqualified themselves but given that power anyways, and a republican led congress. We need to have some serious discussions about what we are going to do, how we\'re going to do it, etc. And the future of the democratic party is also in the balance. During the primaries, you guys talked about clinton being a better choice because she could talk across the isle, so lets see you guys do it by reaching out and talking to people. I\'ll admit i\'m a sanders supporter, but when push came to shove i swallowed my pride and voted clinton, though begrudgingly. I can\'t speak for all sanders supporters, only myself. But I will say that I want to see the democratic party succeed, but only if its willing on being inclusive to everyone, and that needs to start from the bottom up, with people calling themselves democrats dropping this partisan game of excluding people like me who would love to join your party, but is constantly lambasted for speaking out about concerns within the party. I want the democratic party to be DEMOCRATIC, so lets discuss. No more childing shit slinging, no more blame. Lets act like adults. I\'m willing to forgive those for calling me a child, saying I didn\'t know anything, saying I don\'t belong in the democratic party because i\'m not a real democrat, saying my views are "pie in the sky", making assumptions on my character or motivations based on who i supported, making assumptions on my race or views on women.. Yea, i\'ve been called a LOT of things by clinton supporters on here. Lets put that all aside though, and have some serious discussions about what comes next.', '>>{dws4pres} : After months of bragging about how they turned entire households against Hillary', ">>{NuclearSpaceLegos} : Why are you guys so obsessed with anecdotes? Just because some people you know acted a certain way, doesn't mean it was representative of Bernie supporters at large.", ">>{NuclearSpaceLegos} : Look at who's in the White House and Congress. Hillary and her supporters already destoyed the Democratic Party.", ">>{dws4pres} : We did the only rational thing to stop this, we voted for Hillary. Most of you claim that as well, but we know you're full of shit.", ">>{NuclearSpaceLegos} : I voted for Hillary as well, in a swing state no less. However, if you voted for Hillary in the primaries, you played a part in giving us President Trump. >Most of you claim that as well, Well yes, because most Bernie supporters did vote for Hillary. >but we know you're full of shit. Nice alternative fact there bud, but like i said, most Bernie supporters voted for Hillary.", '>>{dws4pres} : Most Bernie supporters *said* they voted for Hillary.', '>>{NuclearSpaceLegos} : And you think that they voted otherwise based on your gut feeling?', ">>{NuclearSpaceLegos} : So I guess it's feels over reals for you?"], [">>{PikachuSquarepants} : Dem senator: Trump thinks LGBT stands for 'Let’s Go Back in Time'", ">>{6heismans} : Yes let's make puns because that's what this issue calls for: jokes. People are going to probably kill themselves because of this administration and all y'all can do is make some shitty pun.", ">>{GladThatIsOver} : Trump doesn't have an opinion. Jeff Sessions has an opinion and Trump just plays along.", ">>{Lost_Traveller_} : If Americans didn't want jokes, then they shouldn't have elected one.", ">>{TheHairyManrilla} : Ed Markey's been on a roll with the acronyms.", '>>{bonestorm5001} : Ugh... except that would be a really good name for a theme gay dance party.', '>>{DmitryDonskoy} : How long did it take Eddie to come up with that one? At least it\'s better than Clinton\'s "Trumped-up Trickle-down."', '>>{CassiopeiaStillLife} : He did not handle this with the gravity it deserves, no.', '>>{TempAlt0} : This exceedingly clever word play confirms my belief that Trump literally wants to massacre gay people. Upvoted!', ">>{qui_moi} : I just don't understand what they think to gain by this.", ">>{mutatoes} : i guess he just made that so he has a reason to mass murder LGBT's. what a complete fuckup.", '>>{microferret} : Man, the comments on that article are pretty sad.', ">>{redditorkun} : We're going to go beyond the past, back when mental patients were either bullied into submission or put into a mental ward. Before societal degradation began and everyone actually worked for the greater good of the nation. Too many filthy sodomites in our country right now. President Trump needs to rid this nation of their ilk. Sickening sickening", '>>{DrKrills} : Maybe, or maybe Donald is a bigot like the company he keeps.', '>>{redditorkun} : A sane person in an insane world will always appear insane', '>>{shadowokker} : You don\'t appear insane, you appear to be a relic, left behind and clinging to flawed ideals. Together we can all work for a greater good the world over, but your version of that is a self contradiction because your "together" is exclusive.', '>>{redditorkun} : A government is supposed to play a key role in maintaining a high moral standard, keeping things clean and respectable, promoting a strong sense of honor, and preventing the dissemination of depraved filth which corrupts society.', ">>{shadowokker} : What's moral about bullying and viewing people as filth? Your rhetoric doesn't sound any better than a nazi's, dude. That's pretty low.", ">>{redditorkun} : >What's moral about bullying and viewing people as filth? Morality seeks the maintenance of society. It is moral once you evaluate the long term impacts on the greatest number of people. >Your rhetoric doesn't sound any better than a nazi's Close. I'm a fascist", ">>{shadowokker} : Well then there's no point having a conversation then really. I do hope to see your way of thinking take less prevalence in the future.", '>>{redditorkun} : Fascism and National Socialism is the future. I remember reading an article that claimed Generation Z will be the most right wing since the 1920s', '>>{shadowokker} : The children are our future, so says Randy Watson.']]

classify and reply

[">>{Mazreth1} : No she didn't. Sorry trumpets, crying won't win you the election", '>>{mwinks99} : And this is bad????...because hes a Mexican??? Why is this bad? What did this man do?', '>>{ExpOriental} : Goddamn it saddens me that people are actually this dumb', '>>{BigDickRichie} : >Ingredients 1 1/2 cups Arborio rice 5 cups simmering chicken stock, preferably homemade, divided 1 cup freshly grated Parmesan cheese 1/2 cup dry white wine 3 tablespoons unsalted butter, diced 2 teaspoons kosher salt 1 teaspoon freshly ground black pepper 1 cup frozen peas', ">>{ryan924} : It's crazy when you consider that this information was in my high school world history textbook.", '>>{joshuatree15} : Cody Wilson: the man who wants Americans to print their own 3D guns', ">>{Engineer_daddy91} : It's never been difficult to make a homemade firearm and it isn't illegal. What a non story this is. Pearl clutching at its finest materials", '>>{gregotav} : 3D printed firearm parts are extremely unsafe to use. Only an idiot would actually try.', '>>{Engineer_daddy91} : 3D printed AR lowers have been a thing for years. They work fine.', '>>{007meow} : This has been (actually) debunked quite a few times now. The nuclear response time is public knowledge and has been so for years.', ">>{OpiRCthrow} : Black Lives Matter Activists aim to 'reclaim' MLK as radical", ">>{MissionStyle} : You are supposed to provide proof for accusations, not proof for defense. Innocent until proven guilty. This article doesn't offer any proof.", '>>{JeNo_340} : Fox News... Not a truthful source. Not saying CNN or MSN C are better but Fox distorts the most.', '>>{minorinc} : The author buries this information in the middle of the article--completely defeating the purpose of the article. SAD!', '>>{gregotav} : Professionally printed metal parts that are inspected for quality, sure, but home printed plastic parts are seriously prone to catastrophic failure and any safety conscience gun owner should steer clear of them.', '>>{Cardenjs} : I mean he kinda was (as far as the government was concerned), he challenged the status quo, the FBI even tried to get him to kill himself. They relented on race but when King was about to start talking about income inequality they sent a hitman to silence him', '>>{WatchingDonFail} : As a previous Secretary of State, she is now the first US government official to release such an important state secret. She doubled down on her claim by having her staff tweet twice about it during the debate. Her pre-prepared tweets prove that this was a calculated move. Is it possible to trust her to be in a position of power while wielding such a blatant disregard for highly classified information? Are these liars misogynist pigs? Or do they just sound like it.', '>>{ItsJustAJokeLol} : He was a radical anti government activist and he was a hero for it. Fox news would be calling him an anti cop anti white terrorist if he were alive today. Tommy Lauren would be ranting about how he\'s the real racist. Conservative white people would be saying "sure equal rights are great but why not just patiently wait and see if the government let\'s you have them?"', '>>{CarmineFields} : The information has been public knowledge for a looooong time.', ">>{SocialJustise} : He was a radical and the way we've whitewashed King does a disservice to the future of successful protest in this country.", ">>{o_MrBombastic_o} : Well he is the largest private contributor to pro democracy movements around the world and helped overthrow 3 communist regimes. The rights not very fond of democracy. They might try to say it's because of his legitimately shady business practices but that's bull since they continually elect a party that fights tooth and nail to end regulations that would make Soros legitimately shady business practices common place.", '>>{DelphisFinn} : And, predictably, Fox News is trying to paint that as a bad thing.', ">>{malpais} : Fox News: Let's use MLK Day as a chance to talk shit about Black people.", '>>{Gus_31} : Harbor Freight: the company who wants Americans to make their own guns with discount Chinese drill presses', ">>{aledlewis} : They look like weapons for arthritis sufferers. And for that reason, I'm not investing.", ">>{Mister_Doc} : Hell, he had to put up with most of that during his lifetime. Racist people haven't changed much since then, but then again they seem to be averse to change.", '>>{ozabelle} : the goldwater kinda tired. he\'s a better name: "the dingbat"', '>>{hobbes305} : No. She did not. Foreign Policy and ForeignPolicy.com >Four Minutes to Armageddon. Richard Nixon, Barack Obama, and the nuclear alert. http://foreignpolicy.com/2010/04/02/four-minutes-to-armageddon-2/ Dated 2010 >The study said, "Although there is nothing automatic about the process, the U.S. president could launch these missiles promptly after receiving warning of an impending attack." **The launch time could be as short as four minutes for the land-based missiles** and 12 minutes for the submarine-based. The study that was mentioned in this article: https://fsi.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/reframing_dealert.pdf This study was quite well known in 2009 and was referenced in numerous newspaper reports and editorials, as well as in many books and blogs.', ">>{Engineer_daddy91} : There are numerous companies that print AR lowers out of polymers, hell DPMS sells an entire line of polymer lower AR's.", ">>{guszi} : So basically this article claims that it's illegal to state what is *clearly* publicly known information if you are a public official with access to classified information. Damn Trump people you desperate", ">>{Engineer_daddy91} : Man, if I had the room for a drill press I'd be up to my ears in 80% lowers.", '>>{guszi} : > After this report’s publication, Smartmatic [updated its website](http://www.smartmatic.com/case-studies/article/united-states-elections/) to remove [the flow chart](https://web.archive.org/web/20161018065735/http://www.smartmatic.com/case-studies/article/united-states-elections/) [and declare](http://www.smartmatic.com/case-studies/article/facts-about-smartmatic/) that “Smartmatic will not be deploying its technology in any U.S. county for the upcoming 2016 U.S. Presidential elections.” If by "removing the flow chart" they mean "put it further down on the page" and by "declare that ..." they mean "stated this in a FAQ that didn\'t exist before our stupid allegations", then I guess they\'re right. Otherwise, these guys are pretty bad liars.', '>>{SilvarusLupus} : He was a radical for a good cause and got killed over it. Issue solved.', '>>{wolfhound27} : That image needs to be flooded on a certain subreddit election day', '>>{Mazreth1} : Ohh Benghazi and praising trump for his 3am twitter rants.', '>>{neuhmz} : The real system they use is ghost gunner. that is a Automatic CNC machine that can carve out an 80% lower for you. Those are just as reliable as a regular AR lower, just way uglier. The plastic guns right now are just a proof of concept of a sort.', '>>{beingsubmitted} : I just really feel the need to point out the "3D" adjective really ought to modify the word "printing" and not the word "gun."', ">>{Breesusmvp} : Liberal News: Let's use every day as a chance to talk shit about Republicans.", '>>{ivsciguy} : Home 3D printers do not use weapons grade polymer. Also, most polymer gun parts are injection molded or pressed, not printed.', '>>{George_Meany} : Must be a conspiracy. According to cringy Trumpists, at least.', '>>{GypsyJC} : Better to Remain Silent and Be Thought a Fool than to Speak and Remove All Doubt.', ">>{bedhed} : I'd definitely share that sentiment for any parts that are exposed to pressure, but many parts, like stocks or ar lowers, are relatively low stressed parts, with low consequences of catastrophic failure.", '>>{AW2B} : This was public information for years! As in it was published in articles. (see the post above /u/hobbes305 )', '>>{gregotav} : There is a significant difference between industrial polymers and abs filament.', '>>{hobbes305} : What was fake on the Internet this election: George Soros’s voting machines https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/10/24/what-was-fake-on-the-internet-this-election-george-soross-voting-machines/', ">>{Jeremymia} : I don't know, revealing military secrets would definitely be treason. If only this was a military secret.", '>>{gregotav} : I am only referring to the upper and lower receivers.', ">>{guszi} : The flowchart is there, just in a different position on the same page. It's such a small article that you only have to scroll down a few lines with a hi-res monitor to see the same flowchart. This article relies on people not checking the sources. It's complete BS.", '>>{99PercentTruth} : And you people wonder why all the anti-Clinton posts get downvoted to oblivion. Stop posting obvious bullshit like this over and over and maybe people will start to take you seriously.', '>>{ThatsPopetastic} : Donald loyalists are so gullible. They will believe anything', '>>{Susarian} : GOP-Connected Companies Providing Electricity to Voting Machines in 50 States', '>>{IngenieroDavid} : So basically… 1. > Soros has never worked for or had an ownership stake in this specific firm, Smartmatic. 2. > Even if he had, it’s pretty much beside the point, since Smartmatic will not be in use in the United States during the 2016 elections.', ">>{bedhed} : The lower on an AR platform is not a highly stressed part - that's why people get away with 3d printing them. The upper is the primary structural member.", ">>{_Bubba_Ho-Tep_} : This company's voting machines aren't being used anywhere in the US.", ">>{Dzmagoon} : Considering trump and soros go way back and they even spent new years partying together a few years back, I'm wondering, if there is something going on, who's favor it will be in.", ">>{RustInHellThatcher} : They think that because he's a rich jew who contributes a lot of money to liberal causes, including increasing regulation of business and raising taxes on the rich, he gotta be some scaaaawy marxist zionist NWO agent who's out to destroy are freedumbs.", '>>{WeJustOrderedBisque} : I like how you responded with "Oh ok then" and then it took you *eleven minutes* to think up this stunner. Trump supporters, ladies and gentlemen.', ">>{Fatandmean} : It wasn't secret though... We have made it known for decades as a deterrent. So unless Russia or North Korea can build a missile that can travel faster (tip: they can't) we have the advantage. Also, watch War Games.", '>>{RustInHellThatcher} : RIP in pepperoni, Ben Ghazi, 711 never forget.', ">>{Egg-MacGuffin} : I'm so sorry for the pain, anguish, and personal sacrifices you endured to get this exclusive information to us. I can't imagine the how difficult is was to actually make sure you know what you're talking about by using the extremely risky and dangerous 'cyber'. You are an American hero.", ">>{Egg-MacGuffin} : You mean READING?!?!?!?! That's for liberal elite shill cucks!", '>>{Egg-MacGuffin} : But we have to manufacture a false equivalency to validate our feelings!', '>>{Shiari_The_Wanderer} : Thank you, citizen, for your kind words. I had to type 4 whole words into Google. I nearly perished.', ">>{HonoredPeople} : I agree. Sweet, sweet desperation as Diddling Donny's supporters realize that he will never see the WH and has a pretty good chance spending the next 10 years in court.", ">>{HonoredPeople} : What's odd about this... RussiaLeaks and Assange, have released actual military secrets and is still being used by Diddling Donnies supporters. It's like the word of God with them."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{mwinks99} : And this is bad????...because hes a Mexican??? Why is this bad? What did this man do?', ">>{MissionStyle} : You are supposed to provide proof for accusations, not proof for defense. Innocent until proven guilty. This article doesn't offer any proof.", '>>{minorinc} : The author buries this information in the middle of the article--completely defeating the purpose of the article. SAD!', ">>{o_MrBombastic_o} : Well he is the largest private contributor to pro democracy movements around the world and helped overthrow 3 communist regimes. The rights not very fond of democracy. They might try to say it's because of his legitimately shady business practices but that's bull since they continually elect a party that fights tooth and nail to end regulations that would make Soros legitimately shady business practices common place.", '>>{guszi} : > After this report’s publication, Smartmatic [updated its website](http://www.smartmatic.com/case-studies/article/united-states-elections/) to remove [the flow chart](https://web.archive.org/web/20161018065735/http://www.smartmatic.com/case-studies/article/united-states-elections/) [and declare](http://www.smartmatic.com/case-studies/article/facts-about-smartmatic/) that “Smartmatic will not be deploying its technology in any U.S. county for the upcoming 2016 U.S. Presidential elections.” If by "removing the flow chart" they mean "put it further down on the page" and by "declare that ..." they mean "stated this in a FAQ that didn\'t exist before our stupid allegations", then I guess they\'re right. Otherwise, these guys are pretty bad liars.', '>>{George_Meany} : Must be a conspiracy. According to cringy Trumpists, at least.', '>>{hobbes305} : What was fake on the Internet this election: George Soros’s voting machines https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/10/24/what-was-fake-on-the-internet-this-election-george-soross-voting-machines/', ">>{guszi} : The flowchart is there, just in a different position on the same page. It's such a small article that you only have to scroll down a few lines with a hi-res monitor to see the same flowchart. This article relies on people not checking the sources. It's complete BS.", '>>{ThatsPopetastic} : Donald loyalists are so gullible. They will believe anything', '>>{Susarian} : GOP-Connected Companies Providing Electricity to Voting Machines in 50 States', '>>{IngenieroDavid} : So basically… 1. > Soros has never worked for or had an ownership stake in this specific firm, Smartmatic. 2. > Even if he had, it’s pretty much beside the point, since Smartmatic will not be in use in the United States during the 2016 elections.', ">>{_Bubba_Ho-Tep_} : This company's voting machines aren't being used anywhere in the US.", ">>{Dzmagoon} : Considering trump and soros go way back and they even spent new years partying together a few years back, I'm wondering, if there is something going on, who's favor it will be in.", ">>{RustInHellThatcher} : They think that because he's a rich jew who contributes a lot of money to liberal causes, including increasing regulation of business and raising taxes on the rich, he gotta be some scaaaawy marxist zionist NWO agent who's out to destroy are freedumbs."], ['>>{joshuatree15} : Cody Wilson: the man who wants Americans to print their own 3D guns', ">>{Engineer_daddy91} : It's never been difficult to make a homemade firearm and it isn't illegal. What a non story this is. Pearl clutching at its finest materials", '>>{gregotav} : 3D printed firearm parts are extremely unsafe to use. Only an idiot would actually try.', '>>{Engineer_daddy91} : 3D printed AR lowers have been a thing for years. They work fine.', '>>{gregotav} : Professionally printed metal parts that are inspected for quality, sure, but home printed plastic parts are seriously prone to catastrophic failure and any safety conscience gun owner should steer clear of them.', '>>{Gus_31} : Harbor Freight: the company who wants Americans to make their own guns with discount Chinese drill presses', ">>{aledlewis} : They look like weapons for arthritis sufferers. And for that reason, I'm not investing.", ">>{Engineer_daddy91} : There are numerous companies that print AR lowers out of polymers, hell DPMS sells an entire line of polymer lower AR's.", ">>{Engineer_daddy91} : Man, if I had the room for a drill press I'd be up to my ears in 80% lowers.", '>>{neuhmz} : The real system they use is ghost gunner. that is a Automatic CNC machine that can carve out an 80% lower for you. Those are just as reliable as a regular AR lower, just way uglier. The plastic guns right now are just a proof of concept of a sort.', '>>{beingsubmitted} : I just really feel the need to point out the "3D" adjective really ought to modify the word "printing" and not the word "gun."', '>>{ivsciguy} : Home 3D printers do not use weapons grade polymer. Also, most polymer gun parts are injection molded or pressed, not printed.', ">>{bedhed} : I'd definitely share that sentiment for any parts that are exposed to pressure, but many parts, like stocks or ar lowers, are relatively low stressed parts, with low consequences of catastrophic failure.", '>>{gregotav} : There is a significant difference between industrial polymers and abs filament.', '>>{gregotav} : I am only referring to the upper and lower receivers.', ">>{bedhed} : The lower on an AR platform is not a highly stressed part - that's why people get away with 3d printing them. The upper is the primary structural member."], [">>{OpiRCthrow} : Black Lives Matter Activists aim to 'reclaim' MLK as radical", '>>{JeNo_340} : Fox News... Not a truthful source. Not saying CNN or MSN C are better but Fox distorts the most.', '>>{Cardenjs} : I mean he kinda was (as far as the government was concerned), he challenged the status quo, the FBI even tried to get him to kill himself. They relented on race but when King was about to start talking about income inequality they sent a hitman to silence him', '>>{ItsJustAJokeLol} : He was a radical anti government activist and he was a hero for it. Fox news would be calling him an anti cop anti white terrorist if he were alive today. Tommy Lauren would be ranting about how he\'s the real racist. Conservative white people would be saying "sure equal rights are great but why not just patiently wait and see if the government let\'s you have them?"', ">>{SocialJustise} : He was a radical and the way we've whitewashed King does a disservice to the future of successful protest in this country.", '>>{DelphisFinn} : And, predictably, Fox News is trying to paint that as a bad thing.', ">>{malpais} : Fox News: Let's use MLK Day as a chance to talk shit about Black people.", ">>{Mister_Doc} : Hell, he had to put up with most of that during his lifetime. Racist people haven't changed much since then, but then again they seem to be averse to change.", '>>{SilvarusLupus} : He was a radical for a good cause and got killed over it. Issue solved.', ">>{Breesusmvp} : Liberal News: Let's use every day as a chance to talk shit about Republicans."], [">>{Mazreth1} : No she didn't. Sorry trumpets, crying won't win you the election", '>>{ExpOriental} : Goddamn it saddens me that people are actually this dumb', '>>{BigDickRichie} : >Ingredients 1 1/2 cups Arborio rice 5 cups simmering chicken stock, preferably homemade, divided 1 cup freshly grated Parmesan cheese 1/2 cup dry white wine 3 tablespoons unsalted butter, diced 2 teaspoons kosher salt 1 teaspoon freshly ground black pepper 1 cup frozen peas', ">>{ryan924} : It's crazy when you consider that this information was in my high school world history textbook.", '>>{007meow} : This has been (actually) debunked quite a few times now. The nuclear response time is public knowledge and has been so for years.', '>>{WatchingDonFail} : As a previous Secretary of State, she is now the first US government official to release such an important state secret. She doubled down on her claim by having her staff tweet twice about it during the debate. Her pre-prepared tweets prove that this was a calculated move. Is it possible to trust her to be in a position of power while wielding such a blatant disregard for highly classified information? Are these liars misogynist pigs? Or do they just sound like it.', '>>{CarmineFields} : The information has been public knowledge for a looooong time.', '>>{ozabelle} : the goldwater kinda tired. he\'s a better name: "the dingbat"', '>>{hobbes305} : No. She did not. Foreign Policy and ForeignPolicy.com >Four Minutes to Armageddon. Richard Nixon, Barack Obama, and the nuclear alert. http://foreignpolicy.com/2010/04/02/four-minutes-to-armageddon-2/ Dated 2010 >The study said, "Although there is nothing automatic about the process, the U.S. president could launch these missiles promptly after receiving warning of an impending attack." **The launch time could be as short as four minutes for the land-based missiles** and 12 minutes for the submarine-based. The study that was mentioned in this article: https://fsi.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/reframing_dealert.pdf This study was quite well known in 2009 and was referenced in numerous newspaper reports and editorials, as well as in many books and blogs.', ">>{guszi} : So basically this article claims that it's illegal to state what is *clearly* publicly known information if you are a public official with access to classified information. Damn Trump people you desperate", '>>{wolfhound27} : That image needs to be flooded on a certain subreddit election day', '>>{Mazreth1} : Ohh Benghazi and praising trump for his 3am twitter rants.', '>>{GypsyJC} : Better to Remain Silent and Be Thought a Fool than to Speak and Remove All Doubt.', '>>{AW2B} : This was public information for years! As in it was published in articles. (see the post above /u/hobbes305 )', ">>{Jeremymia} : I don't know, revealing military secrets would definitely be treason. If only this was a military secret.", '>>{99PercentTruth} : And you people wonder why all the anti-Clinton posts get downvoted to oblivion. Stop posting obvious bullshit like this over and over and maybe people will start to take you seriously.', '>>{WeJustOrderedBisque} : I like how you responded with "Oh ok then" and then it took you *eleven minutes* to think up this stunner. Trump supporters, ladies and gentlemen.', ">>{Fatandmean} : It wasn't secret though... We have made it known for decades as a deterrent. So unless Russia or North Korea can build a missile that can travel faster (tip: they can't) we have the advantage. Also, watch War Games.", '>>{RustInHellThatcher} : RIP in pepperoni, Ben Ghazi, 711 never forget.', ">>{Egg-MacGuffin} : I'm so sorry for the pain, anguish, and personal sacrifices you endured to get this exclusive information to us. I can't imagine the how difficult is was to actually make sure you know what you're talking about by using the extremely risky and dangerous 'cyber'. You are an American hero.", ">>{Egg-MacGuffin} : You mean READING?!?!?!?! That's for liberal elite shill cucks!", '>>{Egg-MacGuffin} : But we have to manufacture a false equivalency to validate our feelings!', '>>{Shiari_The_Wanderer} : Thank you, citizen, for your kind words. I had to type 4 whole words into Google. I nearly perished.', ">>{HonoredPeople} : I agree. Sweet, sweet desperation as Diddling Donny's supporters realize that he will never see the WH and has a pretty good chance spending the next 10 years in court.", ">>{HonoredPeople} : What's odd about this... RussiaLeaks and Assange, have released actual military secrets and is still being used by Diddling Donnies supporters. It's like the word of God with them."]]

classify and reply

[">>{Buddin3} : Never again, never forget. *No Man's Sky*", '>>{Deadlyseed} : No point, the hype is gonna die out the first week', ">>{Noticeably} : Don't. That's how. Stop pre-ordering things. All it does is allow these companies to sell terrible products and still profit from them.", ">>{supermans_alter_ego} : Cancelled my pre-order. Lack of real info and decent games. I will wait, see what games come out (smash bros) and judge the co-op function, as that is what I want. My Wii has been used more in the last few years because of its co-op games than my PS4 or Xbox One. I don't want to play online against some 14 year old who has an odd interest in my mother, I want to play with my friends with a beer on the sofa. Don't let me down Nintendo and I will be back.", ">>{wisemods} : Haven't seen this type of meme before, thanks. Lmao fucking iron islanders.", ">>{SacredFig} : LOL The Verge. By the time they figured out where to place a preorder for the Switch, it's already sold out in the U.S. I pity those who get their preorder information from websites like the Verge", '>>{Halfrich} : Emails: Top Hillary Aide Was Researching Drug That Treats Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s', '>>{pandawand} : I cant preorder one anyways scalpers are buying them all up', '>>{BillCIintonscigar} : Seeings Tim Kaine is as close as a Republican as you can get and still call your self a Democrat looks like we may have a Republican president win or lose.', '>>{Krakalakalakalak} : My wal mart is still taking pre orders as of right now', '>>{FucksLikeAJerry} : Nintendo life. It says they release march 3rd. But youll wait until april before you find one for 299', ">>{unscot} : >No Man's Sky That one looked like crap from the previews. What do you even do in that game?", '>>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : ***DAILYCALLER.COM:*** *We will take anything... and we mean* ***anything*** *out of context in an attempt to make Clinton look bad. Who cares if the actual use for this stuff is for sleep disorders like insomnia!*', ">>{n0xz} : Those drugs can help Trump's shaky hands and his memory.", ">>{ThisFlameIsFire} : That's Minecraft (I didn't play No Man's Sky)", '>>{Halfrich} : You may have a point there. Because her nanny emailed her, saying: >“Reminder fabius at 3:30. Take a nap [sic].”', ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : Naps are fucking awesome, man. Seriously, I'm 37, and if I get the chance for a mid-day or early afternoon nap, I am all ***OVER*** that shit. People who knock naps are people that have no idea how awesome they are.", ">>{Qunidaye} : WOAH. This is 18.5 minutes of deleted Oval Office recordings during Watergate. This is bigger than Iran-Contra. This is White House intern blowjob X1000 Sadly the Laem stream media won't pick this up", ">>{HollywoodCote} : Really? Provigil? This is the Parkinson's red flag? Are y'all even trying anymore? This really stands out because I take Provigil. According to these clowns, I'm falling apart and fucking dying, when in reality, I have narcolepsy. In Clinton's case, some doctors prescribe Provigil for shift-work disorders, which I could see being an issue when you're Secretary of State and often in a new country every other night.", '>>{Halfrich} : You better marry a rapist, psychopath who becomes president if you want to become president. You are going nowhere napping like that. Low energy.', ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : I'd rather take a nap that a handful of off-brand diet pills.", '>>{rastertaster} : If Trump or right wing propagandist journalists took some naps once in a while they would probably be in a better mood and could stop turning people off by being so angry all the time.', ">>{thestilt} : Even if they uncovered a certified letter from Hillary's doctor confirming that she has been diagnosed with Alzheimer's and has no more than two years to live Trump is such a disaster that she would still win.", ">>{Qunidaye} : Just don't blame me when you're stuck on the r/politics beat while I'm making bank over on yahoo news", ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : I'll be honest, I like it here! I have a small following that's constantly getting banned and coming back, like my own little lost puppies!", '>>{hearthneewb} : Honestly if Hillary only had 2 years to live that would make me want to vote for her even more. Kaine is pretty awesome himself and MUCH MUCH MUCH better than Trump.', ">>{nomad1c} : lol, this is one of the best known nootropics out there. tons of people take it to improve performance i take another parkison's drug as a nootropic too", '>>{Halfrich} : You might have point there. As Trump said, she has low stamina and low energy. She must need this drug to function.', ">>{argumentativ} : Wow, it's pretty cool that her aides are so informed about policy issues that they can actually research individual drugs. I can't imagine a Trump aide ever being knowledgeable enough to look up anything like this in the level of detail found in the email.", '>>{wavescrashover} : The email doesn\'t indicate who inquired about Provigil or why they were discussing it. The email starts off by saying, "So I was wrong that it was invented by the military, but right about military use of/interest in it. Background on the drug below." It goes on to explain what it\'s used for & how it works. The last few bullet points in the email (after explaining what it is/how it works) are all in relation to the military. > The military, for obvious reasons, is interested in the consequences of prolonged sleep deprivation and has tested modafinil heavily, particularly on pilots. > A study carried out by the Air Force Research Laboratory found that fatigued pilots on modafinil maintained flight accuracy within approximately 15-30 percent of baseline levels, whereas performance under the no-treatment condition declined by as much as 60-100 percent. Here, benefits were most noticeable after 24-32 hours of continuous wakefulness. A French study yielded similar results and found that for missions of about 24 hours, modafinil for soldiers is preferable to naps. > In the U.S. military, modafinil has been approved for use on certain Air Force missions. The French, British, and Indian militaries have all expressed interest in modafinil. So I fail to see how anyone could take it to indicate she has Parkinson\'s or Alzheimer\'s. But hey... whatever fits the narrative, right?', '>>{Halfrich} : Clinton aides are probably required to be able to do a lot of research about drugs, given her poor health, the need to take naps all the time, being often confused, falling on stairs, and having a cracked head.', ">>{argumentativ} : Well that's a stupid assertion. She isn't poor, she has a doctor who does research like that professionally.", ">>{hwkns} : Come on, during Reagan's twilight administration certain decisions were put in the hands of an astrologer.", '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : Woah there. Raping people is very different from getting Alzheimers.', '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : If she needed medicine why would her aides be doing research? She can afford the best doctors.', ">>{CountPanda} : From the article. > Sullivan, then Secretary Clinton’s deputy chief of staff, informed Clinton in an email that Provigil, a drug commonly used to treat narcolepsy and other sleep-wake disorders, “was invented by the military.” It even includes the email. Unless you're in conspiracy land this isn't an email that says Clinton had Parkinson's and asked for him to get drugs for her. It literally does not say that. You know drugs sometimes are used for more than one treatment purpose.", '>>{CountPanda} : > She must need this drug to function. Welcome the election 2016, where Trump supporters become conspiracy theorists one by one.', ">>{thestilt} : I wholeheartedly agree. I can't stand Hillary but I don't trust Trump which makes me a Libertarian this time around. I'd send some money to the Hillary for President campaign right now if she were to agree to resign a week after inauguration day.", '>>{blackontheinternets} : Hey look dude, Hillary is obviously not a "choice" candidate. But in the history of man, some very great men took naps all the fucking time. Think: Carnegie, Edison, etc. Prolific nappers. If you look it up, you\'ll find a lot of great people took naps throughout the day. So I think you need a new attack angle, cause naps are awesome.', '>>{Halfrich} : Did they also need nannies to tell them to take naps?', '>>{blackontheinternets} : I don\'t think so. They were the types that wouldn\'t even respond to the president during nap time. But we just saw from this paper you posted that the drug they were researching was "preferable to naps." hah.', ">>{Halfrich} : Actually, apparently provigil could cause insomnia. http://www.rxlist.com/provigil-side-effects-drug-center.htm Probably that's why she has a nanny. I hear if Crooked is elected, she's going to create this new high ranking position called Director of Nap Time and give it to Huma Abedin.", ">>{Halfrich} : Yeah. The best thing about him is that he's basically a Republican. If Hillary's elected, and he's a liberal, he'd most definitely become the president when Hillary dies in office and destroy the country even more.", '>>{SorryToSayItBut} : Shocker that an aide would do research and write briefings to inform his employer about issues of interest.', ">>{SorryToSayItBut} : It's not necessarily even for her. Just information she needed for some reason or another.", '>>{Halfrich} : Please take a nap and think about this again.', ">>{SorryToSayItBut} : No need. My father took Provigil. It isn't some kind of evil drug, nor is it a sign of serious illness, even if she were taking it rather than researching it. He was sharp as a knife and worked full time until he was 85. Your link is silly.", ">>{petecash} : I really don't get this strategy because a boring centrist like Tim kaine would have educated whites flock to him even more so than Clinton has. He would win the entire east coast against trump Imo. Polling shows he is by far the most liked guy on either ticket.", '>>{MaximumPlaidness} : > whereas performance under the no-treatment condition declined by as much as 60-100 percent So what exactly does it mean for a pilots performance to decline by 100%? He crashed and died?', ">>{Nosnownow} : Every comment is baseless and at best another crude attempt to create sensationalism out of everyday events. Apparently you've never slipped on a stair unlike the rest of the entire world, never taken a knock to the head ( I had one 2 months ago that broke my nose and I'm pretty sure my doctor doesn't think I'm dying from it. The woman worked horrendous hours as SOS and I'm sure many times she worked through the night. If you look at my computer's browser history, you'd find proof that I researched heart drugs. It's true I did but only because I read the silly doctors report put out by trump and realized 2 of the drugs are for serious heat disease. Using you logic, there you go, proof trump is severely ill with heart disease", '>>{btross} : > Welcome the election 2016, where Trump supporters become conspiracy theorists **en masse** Edited for accuracy...', ">>{Nosnownow} : Trump said it. That should be the 1st clue you are being lied to. Trump can't string an articulate sentence together unless it's written out for him in crayon.", '>>{Nosnownow} : As opposed to trump who apparently marries whores? Now that will be a great first. Wonder how many former customers will make the fox entertainment me shows. Looking forward to that shit storm. "America\'s first whore"', '>>{Nosnownow} : I did and then realized this was more trump distractions from a few important things. 1: where are his tax returns 2: where is the letter from the NFL 3: where is the straightened out facts about Malinia illegally working in the US 4: why is he taking serious heart Medes 5: did he really marry a whore.', '>>{Nosnownow} : As opposed to Malinia saying "honey a client called and wants to meet, ok if I use the Lincoln bedroom?"', '>>{Nosnownow} : How about we get answers to these questions also 1: where are his tax returns 2: where is the letter from the NFL 3: where is the straightened out facts about Malinia illegally working in the US 4: why is he taking serious heart Medes 5: did he really marry a whore.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{Buddin3} : Never again, never forget. *No Man's Sky*", '>>{Deadlyseed} : No point, the hype is gonna die out the first week', ">>{Noticeably} : Don't. That's how. Stop pre-ordering things. All it does is allow these companies to sell terrible products and still profit from them.", ">>{supermans_alter_ego} : Cancelled my pre-order. Lack of real info and decent games. I will wait, see what games come out (smash bros) and judge the co-op function, as that is what I want. My Wii has been used more in the last few years because of its co-op games than my PS4 or Xbox One. I don't want to play online against some 14 year old who has an odd interest in my mother, I want to play with my friends with a beer on the sofa. Don't let me down Nintendo and I will be back.", ">>{wisemods} : Haven't seen this type of meme before, thanks. Lmao fucking iron islanders.", ">>{SacredFig} : LOL The Verge. By the time they figured out where to place a preorder for the Switch, it's already sold out in the U.S. I pity those who get their preorder information from websites like the Verge", '>>{pandawand} : I cant preorder one anyways scalpers are buying them all up', '>>{Krakalakalakalak} : My wal mart is still taking pre orders as of right now', '>>{FucksLikeAJerry} : Nintendo life. It says they release march 3rd. But youll wait until april before you find one for 299', ">>{unscot} : >No Man's Sky That one looked like crap from the previews. What do you even do in that game?", ">>{ThisFlameIsFire} : That's Minecraft (I didn't play No Man's Sky)"], ['>>{Halfrich} : Emails: Top Hillary Aide Was Researching Drug That Treats Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s', '>>{BillCIintonscigar} : Seeings Tim Kaine is as close as a Republican as you can get and still call your self a Democrat looks like we may have a Republican president win or lose.', '>>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : ***DAILYCALLER.COM:*** *We will take anything... and we mean* ***anything*** *out of context in an attempt to make Clinton look bad. Who cares if the actual use for this stuff is for sleep disorders like insomnia!*', ">>{n0xz} : Those drugs can help Trump's shaky hands and his memory.", '>>{Halfrich} : You may have a point there. Because her nanny emailed her, saying: >“Reminder fabius at 3:30. Take a nap [sic].”', ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : Naps are fucking awesome, man. Seriously, I'm 37, and if I get the chance for a mid-day or early afternoon nap, I am all ***OVER*** that shit. People who knock naps are people that have no idea how awesome they are.", ">>{Qunidaye} : WOAH. This is 18.5 minutes of deleted Oval Office recordings during Watergate. This is bigger than Iran-Contra. This is White House intern blowjob X1000 Sadly the Laem stream media won't pick this up", ">>{HollywoodCote} : Really? Provigil? This is the Parkinson's red flag? Are y'all even trying anymore? This really stands out because I take Provigil. According to these clowns, I'm falling apart and fucking dying, when in reality, I have narcolepsy. In Clinton's case, some doctors prescribe Provigil for shift-work disorders, which I could see being an issue when you're Secretary of State and often in a new country every other night.", '>>{Halfrich} : You better marry a rapist, psychopath who becomes president if you want to become president. You are going nowhere napping like that. Low energy.', ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : I'd rather take a nap that a handful of off-brand diet pills.", '>>{rastertaster} : If Trump or right wing propagandist journalists took some naps once in a while they would probably be in a better mood and could stop turning people off by being so angry all the time.', ">>{thestilt} : Even if they uncovered a certified letter from Hillary's doctor confirming that she has been diagnosed with Alzheimer's and has no more than two years to live Trump is such a disaster that she would still win.", ">>{Qunidaye} : Just don't blame me when you're stuck on the r/politics beat while I'm making bank over on yahoo news", ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : I'll be honest, I like it here! I have a small following that's constantly getting banned and coming back, like my own little lost puppies!", '>>{hearthneewb} : Honestly if Hillary only had 2 years to live that would make me want to vote for her even more. Kaine is pretty awesome himself and MUCH MUCH MUCH better than Trump.', ">>{nomad1c} : lol, this is one of the best known nootropics out there. tons of people take it to improve performance i take another parkison's drug as a nootropic too", '>>{Halfrich} : You might have point there. As Trump said, she has low stamina and low energy. She must need this drug to function.', ">>{argumentativ} : Wow, it's pretty cool that her aides are so informed about policy issues that they can actually research individual drugs. I can't imagine a Trump aide ever being knowledgeable enough to look up anything like this in the level of detail found in the email.", '>>{wavescrashover} : The email doesn\'t indicate who inquired about Provigil or why they were discussing it. The email starts off by saying, "So I was wrong that it was invented by the military, but right about military use of/interest in it. Background on the drug below." It goes on to explain what it\'s used for & how it works. The last few bullet points in the email (after explaining what it is/how it works) are all in relation to the military. > The military, for obvious reasons, is interested in the consequences of prolonged sleep deprivation and has tested modafinil heavily, particularly on pilots. > A study carried out by the Air Force Research Laboratory found that fatigued pilots on modafinil maintained flight accuracy within approximately 15-30 percent of baseline levels, whereas performance under the no-treatment condition declined by as much as 60-100 percent. Here, benefits were most noticeable after 24-32 hours of continuous wakefulness. A French study yielded similar results and found that for missions of about 24 hours, modafinil for soldiers is preferable to naps. > In the U.S. military, modafinil has been approved for use on certain Air Force missions. The French, British, and Indian militaries have all expressed interest in modafinil. So I fail to see how anyone could take it to indicate she has Parkinson\'s or Alzheimer\'s. But hey... whatever fits the narrative, right?', '>>{Halfrich} : Clinton aides are probably required to be able to do a lot of research about drugs, given her poor health, the need to take naps all the time, being often confused, falling on stairs, and having a cracked head.', ">>{argumentativ} : Well that's a stupid assertion. She isn't poor, she has a doctor who does research like that professionally.", ">>{hwkns} : Come on, during Reagan's twilight administration certain decisions were put in the hands of an astrologer.", '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : Woah there. Raping people is very different from getting Alzheimers.', '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : If she needed medicine why would her aides be doing research? She can afford the best doctors.', ">>{CountPanda} : From the article. > Sullivan, then Secretary Clinton’s deputy chief of staff, informed Clinton in an email that Provigil, a drug commonly used to treat narcolepsy and other sleep-wake disorders, “was invented by the military.” It even includes the email. Unless you're in conspiracy land this isn't an email that says Clinton had Parkinson's and asked for him to get drugs for her. It literally does not say that. You know drugs sometimes are used for more than one treatment purpose.", '>>{CountPanda} : > She must need this drug to function. Welcome the election 2016, where Trump supporters become conspiracy theorists one by one.', ">>{thestilt} : I wholeheartedly agree. I can't stand Hillary but I don't trust Trump which makes me a Libertarian this time around. I'd send some money to the Hillary for President campaign right now if she were to agree to resign a week after inauguration day.", '>>{blackontheinternets} : Hey look dude, Hillary is obviously not a "choice" candidate. But in the history of man, some very great men took naps all the fucking time. Think: Carnegie, Edison, etc. Prolific nappers. If you look it up, you\'ll find a lot of great people took naps throughout the day. So I think you need a new attack angle, cause naps are awesome.', '>>{Halfrich} : Did they also need nannies to tell them to take naps?', '>>{blackontheinternets} : I don\'t think so. They were the types that wouldn\'t even respond to the president during nap time. But we just saw from this paper you posted that the drug they were researching was "preferable to naps." hah.', ">>{Halfrich} : Actually, apparently provigil could cause insomnia. http://www.rxlist.com/provigil-side-effects-drug-center.htm Probably that's why she has a nanny. I hear if Crooked is elected, she's going to create this new high ranking position called Director of Nap Time and give it to Huma Abedin.", ">>{Halfrich} : Yeah. The best thing about him is that he's basically a Republican. If Hillary's elected, and he's a liberal, he'd most definitely become the president when Hillary dies in office and destroy the country even more.", '>>{SorryToSayItBut} : Shocker that an aide would do research and write briefings to inform his employer about issues of interest.', ">>{SorryToSayItBut} : It's not necessarily even for her. Just information she needed for some reason or another.", '>>{Halfrich} : Please take a nap and think about this again.', ">>{SorryToSayItBut} : No need. My father took Provigil. It isn't some kind of evil drug, nor is it a sign of serious illness, even if she were taking it rather than researching it. He was sharp as a knife and worked full time until he was 85. Your link is silly.", ">>{petecash} : I really don't get this strategy because a boring centrist like Tim kaine would have educated whites flock to him even more so than Clinton has. He would win the entire east coast against trump Imo. Polling shows he is by far the most liked guy on either ticket.", '>>{MaximumPlaidness} : > whereas performance under the no-treatment condition declined by as much as 60-100 percent So what exactly does it mean for a pilots performance to decline by 100%? He crashed and died?', ">>{Nosnownow} : Every comment is baseless and at best another crude attempt to create sensationalism out of everyday events. Apparently you've never slipped on a stair unlike the rest of the entire world, never taken a knock to the head ( I had one 2 months ago that broke my nose and I'm pretty sure my doctor doesn't think I'm dying from it. The woman worked horrendous hours as SOS and I'm sure many times she worked through the night. If you look at my computer's browser history, you'd find proof that I researched heart drugs. It's true I did but only because I read the silly doctors report put out by trump and realized 2 of the drugs are for serious heat disease. Using you logic, there you go, proof trump is severely ill with heart disease", '>>{btross} : > Welcome the election 2016, where Trump supporters become conspiracy theorists **en masse** Edited for accuracy...', ">>{Nosnownow} : Trump said it. That should be the 1st clue you are being lied to. Trump can't string an articulate sentence together unless it's written out for him in crayon.", '>>{Nosnownow} : As opposed to trump who apparently marries whores? Now that will be a great first. Wonder how many former customers will make the fox entertainment me shows. Looking forward to that shit storm. "America\'s first whore"', '>>{Nosnownow} : I did and then realized this was more trump distractions from a few important things. 1: where are his tax returns 2: where is the letter from the NFL 3: where is the straightened out facts about Malinia illegally working in the US 4: why is he taking serious heart Medes 5: did he really marry a whore.', '>>{Nosnownow} : As opposed to Malinia saying "honey a client called and wants to meet, ok if I use the Lincoln bedroom?"', '>>{Nosnownow} : How about we get answers to these questions also 1: where are his tax returns 2: where is the letter from the NFL 3: where is the straightened out facts about Malinia illegally working in the US 4: why is he taking serious heart Medes 5: did he really marry a whore.']]

classify and reply

['>>{LightsOut5774} : This subreddit is so much nicer than /r/Apple.', ">>{JimLahee} : I wish I liked any of the candidates enough to vote. The third party candidates are even weak. Johnson can't stop fucking up on foreign policy. Jill Stein is unqualified and too immature to be president. And Donald and Hillary are pretty self-explanatory. This election is by far the worst when it comes down to the choices.", ">>{catpor} : Clinton camp slams Trump campaign on 'gas chamber' remark", '>>{IPAsRule} : Not only that, over there the stupid moderator bot constantly removes valid pertinent questions.', '>>{LightsOut5774} : True that dude. I actually tried to make a post a couple days after iOS 10 launched saying that my iPad was much slower after the update, and if anyone else was with a 4th gen iPad was facing any issues. Lo and behold, the damn bot removed it', ">>{mmaireenehc} : Yeah. I also like that people here are more understanding that it's not always about Apple. You know, like it's possible for someone to have an iPhone and still use Windows PCs.", ">>{Ultrawideband} : Boop. Bop. Beep. Who you callin' stupid? (just kidding : )", '>>{catpor} : > "Offensive" references to the Holocaust are "never acceptable, especially from a presidential campaign," Clinton\'s director of Jewish outreach Sarah Bard said. > Donald Trump Jr. said on a local radio program Wednesday that the media would be "warming up the gas chamber" if Republicans were caught lying, as he accused Clinton of doing.', '>>{JacobCrim88} : We will be no better than the Baby Boomers if we do this and Trump wins.', ">>{kyonu} : There won't be 1896 on the ballot, though. And writing them in, in most states, they will just get thrown out.", ">>{DAEFlair} : I got banned from Apple about a year ago for telling them to calm the fuck down. They're impatient 12 year olds who knee jerk to everything", '>>{GreyRoses} : Another Deplorable shrill whistle for the rest of the Trumplets to be Deplorable.', '>>{Samueul} : I think /r/apple just attracts more trolls in general.', ">>{Samueul} : After today's keynote, we are going to see lots more of that :)", ">>{beatyatoit} : Well, damn. When someone very casually utters a reference like this, when knowingly reaching many people, it's a sure sign that type of thinking is second nature for them. Star of David/money association, 88, gas chamber, David Duke, my African-American, alt-right associations, the judge is Mexican, not renting to black people, birther, Pocahantas...this isn't a conspiracy. It's who this family is.", ">>{Atlas26} : As someone who does exactly this, and will continue to (as I see the importance of MacOS declining in Apple's vision, which admittedly is purely speculative. That said, convergence of mobile and desktop is happening across the board, and Apple would be wise to not ignore such trends...), it works out great for me.", '>>{Atlas26} : Avoid at all costs, that sub is toxic AF haha', '>>{RajivFernanDatBribe} : When will anyone notice that Trump plagiarized Bill Clinton\'s racist dog whistle slogan from his campaigns and from Hillary\'s 2008 run? "Time to Make America Great Again. I know Hillary\'s the one who can do it." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rj5uVCA2sg', ">>{JimLahee} : How many are actually going to be on the ballots and actually counted though? You can use that argument, but unless third parties get recognized to where I can branch out from the green party and libertarian, which won't until we fix our election processes, it's hard to support one of those many candidates, especially when majority won't be on my ballot to vote for.", ">>{nphased} : Why, voting for lesser evils got us here. I'm voting for a third party candidate this year. The two major candidates are just not qualified.", '>>{BattleofAlgiers} : Not this millennial. Donald is not getting those nuclear codes.', '>>{Rickdrizzle} : I agree. Definitely nicer than the Android sub as well.', '>>{TheTelephone} : They\'re really reaching here. The US used gas chambers through the 1990\'s, more recently than the electric chair. "Sending someone to the gas chamber" is not an anti-semetic phrase. I don\'t even like Trump or Trump Jr, but harking this back to the Holocaust is pretty tasteless on part of the DNC and a lot of commenters here on Reddit. If someone can tell me without hyperbole how uttering the word "gas chamber" is anti-semetic, please do tell.', '>>{ward0630} : >The US used gas chambers through the 1990\'s You know that\'s not what he meant. >If someone can tell me without hyperbole how uttering the word "gaschamber" is anti-semitic, please do tell I don\'t know if you read his comments, but he didn\'t just say the word "gas chamber." He said that the GOP would be sent to the gas chamber if it did what Hillary has done. In that context, it\'s an obvious reference to the Holocaust, which is what most people associate gas chambers with. Whether he was making a crude joke or if this is something he sincerely believes doesn\'t matter. It\'s extremely offensive for the son of a wealthy real estate guy and presidential candidate to compare his party to Holocaust victims.', '>>{BattleofAlgiers} : So Jill Stein and Gary "literally knows nothing about international relations" Johnson are?', '>>{Atlas26} : /r/Android has basically been imploding with toxicity over the past year or so', ">>{TheTelephone} : What a dense explanation. You're offended for the sake of being offended. You read into it your way, and I read into it my way. We have different readings of it, but you say mine is wrong and yours is right, because you would rather have something to be outraged over.", '>>{shmangit69} : I noticed this too even with just reading the comments people leave in each thread. Definitely some good people here. Cheers! Keep it up!', ">>{Uxbridge42} : How dare he take the left's favourite attack from them! Only Dems get to call people nazis!", ">>{ward0630} : >What a dense explanation It was only two paragraphs. >You're offended for the sake of being offended No, I'm offended that Eric Trump thinks it's okay to compare the media asking for his daddy's tax returns to being gassed to death. >You say mine is wrong and yours is right You literally asked me to explain how Junior's comments were anti-Semitic. Don't start whining that I didn't answer your question the way you wanted. >You would rather have something to be outraged over When surrogates for presidential candidates start comparing media scrutiny to mass murder, then yes, I'm going to be outraged over it. Some things are worth getting worked up over.", '>>{Rickdrizzle} : I see that as well. I have both an iPhone and an android and I like to read up on both regarding to news, experiences people have, and so on. Lots of negativity there lol', '>>{trumpetmuppet} : Former /r/Android dude. When I switched to the 7 I went over to /r/Apple and was immediately disappointed with how technically ignorant they were over there (and very troll-y). Very happy I found this place.', ">>{TheTelephone} : Dense meaning shallow. I'm honestly offended at everyone here's using the Holocaust as a political football. I think after the smoke clears, a lot of people ought to feel downright ashamed of themselves.", '>>{tensai_76} : The first day I switched to iOS from Android (Nexus/Samsung Refugee) I visited the Apple sub. No way would I stay there. I found this sub by accident too having found the iOS 10 beta sub and learning how to download the betas (I got my phone with 9.2 so I was anxious to try 10) So thank you too all the people here that make this place decent and less elitist', '>>{dfuqt} : I post in /r/apple, /r/iphone and /r/ipad. There are some great people in all of them, but there are bad ones too. It\'s funny that you\'ve posted this after today\'s event, as a quick look over in /r/apple right now highlights the problem it has with people who defend Apple and their products like it\'s their job. And I really mean "like it\'s their job". People posting dozens of times a day, every day for years. Literally thousands of posts, and not a single one of them contains a remotely negative comment about Apple. Even in the face of legitimate issues they will spin it around. You start to recognise them after a while, and I could name at least six off the top of my head to prove my point. But that would be against the rules, and would ultimately be unfair. I guess people are entitled to their opinions. They aren\'t entitled to be quite as snarky and downright aggressive about it though. For what it\'s worth, such people are in the minority. And the mods are great. You very often see people going waaaaay to far. But within minutes the posts are gone.', '>>{Antnee83} : Millennials are most likely to not remember what happened in 2000.', ">>{spookan} : I highly, HIGHLY doubt Trump's idiot boy knows anything about the history of capital punishment in the US. It's obvious what he was referring to.", ">>{ihavethebestwords} : > They're really reaching here. The US used gas chambers through the 1990's, You mean when Eric Trump was 10? Growing up in New York which never used gas as a method of execution? Yeah, I'm sure he was talking about that...", ">>{nphased} : I like Jill's plan of stepping back from so many foreign entanglements. We're on track to spend 6 Trillion dollars on our foreign wars!! I'll take her plan over Clinton who is an expert in state affairs but is a war hawk. Clinton is the smart person who doesn't have any wisdom. I think people are being a bit unfair to Gary especially on the first issue, but the second gaffe is going to hurt him.", ">>{TheTelephone} : Everyone knows that the gas chamber was used in America. They don't hang people from the gallows anymore, but we all know that they DID. Such a stupid argument.", '>>{doog201} : Iv heard your first statement for every Trump "scandal." "You know that\'s not what he meant!" At what point do you stop to think that maybe you\'re drawing ridiculous conclusions?', '>>{dissaver} : he should have said "preparing the gallows."', ">>{SgtPepe} : They should do a poll and see how many users truly own a recent macbook. There's so much whining...", ">>{doog201} : Why would you highly doubt that a person with his education doesn't know that the gas chamber was used as a popular method of execution in the US? Like him or not attacking Trump Jr. for being stupid is a losing battle.", ">>{Kildragoth} : I'm confused as to why it matters. It was used to compare the treatment by the media. If anything it seems like the media is warming up the gas chambers over this comment.", ">>{kstinfo} : A reasonable person - you won't last long around here.", ">>{JimLahee} : Unfortunately, I agree. I'm not an advocate for Clinton by any means, but a Donald Trump presidency is becoming more realistic and terrifying. And that supreme court nomination is extremely important. If we get another Scalia, we'll be stuck in same boat sinking for an even longer period of time.", ">>{Whodiditandwhy} : It's largely because the sub is full of equal parts Apple fans and trolls.", '>>{Trickster174} : Apple updated their MacBook Pro line. After years of waiting, it was underwhelming and alarmingly expensive.', ">>{bottomdenominator} : The Dems ran a candidate so boring he couldn't win his home state. That's what happened in 2000. This year they are running one who is so much worse. They'll get what they deserve.", '>>{Bannakaffalatta1} : When every single Trump supporter doesn\'t bounce back with "But he didn\'t really mean that" anytime him or his surrogates say something offensive.', ">>{dfuqt} : If the bot hadn't removed it you would have been downvoted to oblivion anyway. Hissing iPhones, performance issues, battery problems, comments on low light camera performance - nobody wants to talk about that. But you post a simple statement that Apple are great, and that's your karma for the year sorted right there.", '>>{DAEFlair} : Dunno they were complaining about how they were talking about sales numbers or whatever for the first 10 minutes like they always do.', '>>{ihavethebestwords} : >Everyone knows that the gas chamber was used in America. They don\'t hang people from the gallows anymore, but we all know that they DID. Such a stupid argument. I don\'t really care what you think "everyone" knows. The salient question is, what is the connotation Eric Trump most likely associates with the use of "gas chamber?" Growing up a New Yorker well past the era when gas chambers were in frequent use in America, his most likely association is killing Jews. And if that wasn\'t his intent, if he really does picture, i don\'t know, Flash Gordon instead of Schindler\'s List when he thinks of gas chambers, then hes a fucking idiot for not knowing better. Occam\'s Razor says he\'s deplorable either way.', '>>{TheTelephone} : That\'s silly. If I say the word "science experiment" people don\'t immediately think of Japanese colonialism.', '>>{BattleofAlgiers} : Americans picking their President\'s based on how boring they are and if they\'d like to "drink a beer with them" is the real problem IMO. As you illustrate. The job is hard and complicated. I don\'t want an average joe for a nuclear physicist and I don\'t want an average joe for a President.', '>>{ihavethebestwords} : Lol. Terrible analogy. Wanna try for real?', '>>{eighteencircle9} : Is it not better than Surface Pro by Microsoft?', '>>{XenuXVII} : I agree! We are a great community 😁🍺🙌🏻😋✌🏻️', ">>{eRWT} : Yep, I used to be hardcore about everything windows (including phone) but I'm currently really enjoying my new iPhone 7 along with my Surface Pro 4 and desktop PC.", '>>{rollsie7} : People over at /r/jailbreak are very helpful as well', ">>{Kildragoth} : What he meant to say was that the media would crucify them for lying. Wait, that would offend Christians. They would burn them at the stake. Wait, that'd offend witches. They would unleash a torrent of hot ash on them. Ah, damn, the Pompeians wouldn't appreciate that one. They would sink their ship. Descendents of the survivors of the Titanic would crash an airplane into my building over that one...", '>>{bottomdenominator} : Why did you put quotes on that? Are you quoting someone? If so - could you link it? Maybe Gary needs better writers. Or maybe he should control access so that only the special media gets to ask him questions that he wrote so that he never gets ambushed. What Foreign Leader do you admire?', '>>{Lynx_Rufus} : The phrase has been in semi-common use since the 80s but k.', ">>{Methaxetamine} : Better but not great. Today they downvoted someone for saying they use juice cards to add data and saying you shouldn't have and iPhone if you don't have a data plan. I was downvoted for being able to pay my own phone bill. Many more you'll see. The nicest one is by far /r/jailbreak", ">>{RajivFernanDatBribe} : So what you're saying is that the stupid phrase is not a racist dog whistle, which we've been told a thousand times?", '>>{T-Nan} : I would argue, no. At least, the changes from the SP 3 to 4 was way better than the upgrade for the new macbook', '>>{astalavista114} : I think part of the problem is that every time there is a major Apple announcement (like the one just gone) a ton of people come to read the sub. Unfortunately, some of them come to just argue how terrible Apple are (sometimes for reasonable reasons, like wanting their headphone jacks [I\'m on the fence there. Its probably a touch too early really, but someone major has to make the leap, and if Apple doesn\'t, I don\'t think anyone will really go for it] to unreasonable ones like "OMG the retina MacBooks only have core-M processors and that means they are shit."), and that - particularly the latter - gets people\'s hackles up. Do I like *everything* Apple has ever done, or even everything they\'ve done in the last couple of years? No. For one, they\'ve really got to clean up their naming scheme across their products (the MacBooks are getting there with the death of the 11 inch MBA - although the absolute bottom end new MBP doesn\'t help things much), particularly in the iPad line - iPad Mini (one size), iPad Air (one size), iPad Pro (two sizes, one of which is the same as the Air). Get your shit together! And I would like the Cheese Grater back too. Yeah, the Trash Can looks neat, but it isn\'t as extendable as the Grater was. But on the whole, they\'re doing pretty good.', '>>{BattleofAlgiers} : I get backing out of foreign entanglements, that\'s fair. But I don\'t see how you can argue that Jill Stein is "qualified." Her highest elected position is on a local town council. Would you promote a Freshman Bio major to Surgeon General because "she had some good ideas?" I\'m sorry but it bothers me that people think the Presidency is a job that anybody can just step into without any legislative or executive experience. Forget politics. I\'m talking about understanding the process of lawmaking and understanding the more complicated aspects of our government. Obama was a constitutional scholar ffs. I\'m legitimately concerned that she doesn\'t understand the economy. She opposed raising the debt ceiling - which tells me she has a fundamentally flawed understanding of the national debt. Free higher public education is a mirage. It helps those who can already afford college more than those who can\'t because it conveniently ignores what really prevents people from affording college. Housing, food, books, laptops and the opportunity cost of not working. Her idea to institute quantitative easing to forgive student loan debt just doesn\'t make sense. She can\'t even explain it. This is what she said about it: > magic trick that basically people don\'t need to understand any more about than that it is a magic trick I mean, jesus, she may as well be selling snake oil. Beyond that, I personally think that her military policy is a joke. Close all overseas bases and cut spending by at least 50%? Beyond the obvious, can we talk about what she plans to do with the influx of recently unemployed and disgruntled young men with weapons training? What will they do for work? I simply don\'t agree with her from a strategic perspective but I suppose that\'s a fairly legitimate disagreement (though I don\'t know where she has the credibility to speak on foreign relations..at all). As for Johnson, I\'m sorry but those aren\'t gaffes. The President\'s primary responsibility is our foreign relations. The election is a job interview. This is a man revealing that he is inadequately prepared for the job for which he is applying. If I was his job interviewer, I would have ended the interview right then and there.', '>>{astalavista114} : Let me guess - WWDC, when they *always* highlight that the majority of the Apple Userbase are on the latest version of their OSes (and that users of other OSes are not) to encourage devs (which is primarily who they are presenting to) to use the new features they are announcing? A couple of times at other events they\'ve done about 30 seconds on sales numbers and just said "Well, we sold a shit tonne of products and everyone is using 10.WhateverTheMostRecentVersionIs and iOS Whichever. Here\'s new stuff!", and therefore they should always do that. Right?', '>>{bottomdenominator} : My point was Gore was such a shitty politician that he couldn\'t carry his home state. I wouldn\'t want to drink a beer with anyone who uses drone strikes that kill children to take out our "enemies" in Pakistan. I also wouldn\'t want to have a beer with a racist. To be honest, I don\'t drink. Looks like Gary is my guy.', ">>{mayaisme} : Sometimes I think /r/apple is made up of more android users than iPhone users. It's almost like it's a sub to hate on apple", ">>{astalavista114} : To be fair, the SP3 needed a *lot* of improvements to deal with its issues. Performance and spec wise, I actually quite like the SP4, and I think it's a fantastic device, but it's not the right device for me (Windows is the killer, unfortunately - although I do have a desktop running Windows for when I need it). (sosumi) As for judging whether the improvements are worth it for the MBP - I'll have to wait and see what the reviewers say. There's Apple's claimed performance improvements which are pretty damn good, but those are probably under optimal conditions. As for connectivity - put it like this: It's well suited for the future. 4 TB3 ports (so 2 5K monitors? Why not?), although power is also provided through there as well (so long MagSafe!), so if you don't have an external device that can also power over that connection (some monitors can, for instance), you'll need one of the ports to provide power to the MacBook itself. But in the here and now, it's a bit like the headphone jack on the iPhone - probably a year or two too soon, but because they've done it others will follow, making the change to USB-C and Thunderbolt 3 actually happen (hopefully).", ">>{iranintoavan} : I would argue yes. Basically the same price spec wise. Likely better build quality. Much better trackpad and keyboard. Bigger and better quality screen. 4 thunderbolt 3 ports. Much faster storage. Runs macOS. I suppose if you really want to use it as a tablet it wins but from what I've heard it's not very good at being a tablet.", '>>{exploding_growing} : Yeah, Ivanka seems like she escaped the worst of his traits, but father and sons... wow.', ">>{tombiscuit} : One of the massive flaws of Reddit is that there can only be one /r/Apple, and all subreddits are governed by moderators who are unaccountable and unelected. It's nearly impossible to track and question moderator decisions unless they happen to you. And some subreddits have an enormous amount of power.", ">>{liberationation} : If you don't live in a close swing state, your vote will not sway the election. Voting third party has more meaning in those places than elsewhere.", '>>{OctoberSurpriseParty} : Did Jews die from gallows? If so, anti semantic!!', ">>{DaytonaZ33} : Trust me, it's mostly because trolls use /r/apple. Around any keynote or product launch it's basically impossible to have any sort of real reaction from Apple fans, as it's all people from other subs coming to say the same things over and over. Jobs rolling in grave, Apple is doomed, etc etc.", ">>{BattleofAlgiers} : This is the wrong question to ask a person with a degree in International Relations. It's hard to ADMIRE foreign leaders as they are complicated figures. Leaders in general. You don't get to where you are without cracking a few eggs so to speak. I don't admire them because I don't aspire to be them. That said, I do see foreign leaders who I agree with on a high-level philosophically. Canada's Justin Trudeau would be one. While I worry about the Hindu-nationalist aspects of his party, Prime Minister Narendra Singh Modi seems to be doing an alright job in India. Angela Merkel has not only kept Europe afloat during some seriously turbulent economic times but Germany is one of the engines of the global economy. If we take it further back in history. Deng Xiaopeng is certainly a complicated figure but you have to respect how diligently he transformed China from a communist country into one of the largest capitalist economies in the world. Similarly, Lee Kwan Yu in Singapore didn't exactly run a liberal democracy but he lso created one of the most successful and richest countries on the planet, in like...50 years. Obviously a figure like Neslon Mandela stands out. Frankly, I can name far more foreign leaders who were idiots, despots, assholes etc. But again, it bothers me that a Presidential candidate knows less about major international relations players than I do. It's one thing if he doesn't completely understand the dynamics behind the India-Pakistan conflict or the proxy groups involved or the history of the conflict. Those are the kinds of things we have experts for. But knowing important foreign leaders and locations? That's a matter of preparation and just giving a fuck. That was a quote because it's clearly not his real middle name.", '>>{tensai_76} : A reflection of human society through the corridors of history.', '>>{OctoberSurpriseParty} : The context: media controles by jeeeeeeeeews. Jews gas chamber, anti semantic!!', ">>{BattleofAlgiers} : Well let's be honest, the only reason Gary won't launch a drone strike in the Middle East is he doesn't know where it is. I can be opposed to drone strikes and have it outweighed by the fact that I don't think that Gary Johnson has the intelligence or understanding to protect us with a dramatically decreased military. He hasn't shown a good enough grasp of international affairs.", ">>{beatyatoit} : hmmmm...so you're comparing the way that millions of people...men, women and children, were taken to camps, placed in gas chambers, and killed as part of a final solution to rid the world of a specific group of people, to Christ, witches, and people that died via a natural catastrophe? You are a Trump supporter to the core, aren't you?", '>>{DJ-Salinger} : Thankfully, no one can lie on the internet.', ">>{DJ-Salinger} : /r/Apple near a keynote is much different than what it's normally like.", ">>{beatyatoit} : you're right; Ivanka seems to have retained some empathy; the males, on the other hand...like father, like sons.", '>>{DocFunkinstein} : As a recent convert this sub is also better than r/android as well. The android circle jerk sub Reddit I feed better for info and comments', ">>{hanssone777} : /apple and /android is a shitfest with fanboys from both sides arguing in a keyboard warrior's battlefield. /googlepixel is a more nicer side of android, so go figure yeah", ">>{neoookami} : Probably better to compare the Surface Book to the MacBook Pro really, since both are laptops first. Especially when both have base models at the same price point. (Though you can go cheaper on the Surface Book if you go with half the storage.) With the Surface you're passing on the dedicated GPU in the keyboard at that price point. With the MBP you're passing on the Touch Bar and getting half as many Thunderbolt ports", '>>{spookan} : Because a) He only has a bs, which is below the standard level of education for someone that wealthy and influential, b) his degree is in econ and c) I know plenty of well educated morons who know little about anything outside their field of chosen study.', '>>{bottomdenominator} : Do you think Obama knows where Aleppo is? What in the hell is he doing about it and how will Hillary handle it any differently? They allow the fires to burn in Aleppo because it suits their endgame. A vote for Hillary is surely a vote for dead children.', '>>{nphased} : I\'ll take Jill over either Clinton or Trump. I\'m not sure what is so magical about legislative experience, all it really means is that you\'ve hung around a lot of lawyers and kicked around in the same halls of power that have given us a leadership that got us here. Our current terrible presidential candidates are proof that the "qualifications" you hold so dear are not the kind of experience that is productive of good decisions. Jill is a medical doctor and an activist, she\'s smart and can organize and has identified key issues for the prosperity of our nation. I\'ll take someone who has the right goals in mind and might make a few mistakes and changes getting there over someone who knows every rule, but somehow keeps managing to do the wrong thing or skirt the spirit and the letter of the rules knowingly.', '>>{DJ-Salinger} : Yea...the day after is still near the Keynote.', '>>{Kildragoth} : No, actually. The meaning behind each example is that there\'s an overreaction to something. It\'s a metaphor meant to be interpreted figuratively. If someone says "god damn it" do you stop them and lecture them that God shouldn\'t waste even unlimited resources focused on something so trivial?', ">>{doog201} : Only has a bachelor's degree huh? Since when does having a bs make you dumber than average? And people you know, do you know Trump Jr? Because it sounds like you're talking out of your ass with wild speculation.", ">>{Atlas26} : I'm a windows user, but it's at least ballpark competitive...to me, anyway.", '>>{BattleofAlgiers} : > Do you think Obama knows where Aleppo is? What in the hell is he doing about it Oh you mean how ISIS is constantly losing territory and resources?', ">>{BattleofAlgiers} : > might make a few mistakes and changes getting there Mistakes made by Presidents are often measured in body counts. It's not magical buddy. Experience makes you better at most jobs. All else being equal, who do you trust as a medical doctor? A first-year intern or an attending physician?", ">>{nphased} : Clinton's body count is already high and she shows irrational signs of looking for more in her foreign policy. Trump - I don't even know what his policies are - take your pick of his many positions.", '>>{OtroGatoGordo} : Ivanka is an enabler. Her children are Jewish.', '>>{OtroGatoGordo} : I hate Trump and the spawn of Satan his whole family is, but please ELI5, why is he saying "physical punishment"?', '>>{Atlas26} : What do you mean by technically ignorant? In what ways?', ">>{choppingbroccolini} : When the two parties are corrupt, you don't have much choice if you wish to respect your values and maintain your integrity.", '>>{Muskworker} : It says he said corporal punishment - presumably they mean capital punishment. Gas chambers are still a [legal method of execution used in some states](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_chamber#United_States) (though apparently the last such execution was back in 1999).', '>>{95Kill3r} : That racist nazi Microsoft paint frog he is destroying this society!', '>>{IHave9Dads} : The difference is, I\'ve never once in my life heard anybody say "Warming up the gas chambers" without it being related to the holocaust, people say "goddammit" all the time, they say "crucify" all the time to and it\'s not related to religion.', '>>{tombiscuit} : Literally by creating the subreddit, or asking an existing mod if you can join them.', '>>{buzzlightlime} : So public criticism of the rich and powerful is equivalent to the systematic slaughter of an minority group?', '>>{KuKuMacadoo} : As an Apple guy, I much prefer /r/Android. The Apple community in general is terrible on Reddit.', '>>{pongmanJ25} : You\'re right about that! I was perusing that sub last night, digesting the blowback from the Apple Special Event and I came across a question about an iPhone--a mundane and honest question but valid nonetheless. I forget the question, but one of the comments was like (paraphrasing), "You know, if questions like these frequent the Subreddit too much, then it becomes bland and useless; if they don\'t have the sense to use the search feature, then they\'re dumb." As I see it, the more posts, the merrier! The more questions, even better! Edit: And, yes, the folks here are very helpful, great spirited, and courteous 😊😃 The /Galaxynote7 sub is great, too!', '>>{thewimsey} : Yes...but they are both 100 times better than /r/technology ...', '>>{Boscolt} : I uhh... I thought this WAS r/apple until just now...', ">>{buzzlightlime} : That's how you take down an out of touch aristocracy", '>>{Kildragoth} : How was it related to the Holocaust? He\'s suggesting he\'d be victimized by the media. It\'s obvious the media wouldn\'t literally fire up an actual gas chamber and lead the Trump family into it, so why are you or anyone else taking it literally? The crucify example can be specific to Christianity or just as a torture device. No one who says "they\'ll crucify me if I\'m late again" actually equates themselves to a person who starves to death while nailed to a cross in the sun.', '>>{Kildragoth} : >So public criticism of the rich and powerful is equivalent to the systematic slaughter of an minority group? If I say "I\'ll be crucified if I\'m late to work" am I saying someone will actually nail me to a cross to starve to death? I\'m saying I\'ll be in a lot of trouble. Replace "crucified" with "thrown in the gas chambers" and how is this different, except of course in the context of a presidential election?', '>>{IHave9Dads} : I\'m saying who has ever said "Warming up the gas chambers" as a reference to scrutiny?', ">>{Kildragoth} : I've never heard it before either. Though he probably uses it often.", '>>{EllenPaosFrontButt} : >What a dense explanation >It was only two paragraphs. Holy shit are you memeing right now?', ">>{spookan} : I mentioned his degree because you mentioned his education as if it was something special. I wouldn't expect the average econ major to have a particular knowledge of those practices. But even if they did, why would they expect the general public to? I mean, it is a much wilder speculation to assume that he's alluding to something obscure versus something well known. I don't even think it was that big a deal, compared to everything his father has said. People can't handle any criticism of the Trumps or they would be able to admit that this was a slip of the tongue."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{catpor} : Clinton camp slams Trump campaign on 'gas chamber' remark", '>>{catpor} : > "Offensive" references to the Holocaust are "never acceptable, especially from a presidential campaign," Clinton\'s director of Jewish outreach Sarah Bard said. > Donald Trump Jr. said on a local radio program Wednesday that the media would be "warming up the gas chamber" if Republicans were caught lying, as he accused Clinton of doing.', '>>{GreyRoses} : Another Deplorable shrill whistle for the rest of the Trumplets to be Deplorable.', ">>{beatyatoit} : Well, damn. When someone very casually utters a reference like this, when knowingly reaching many people, it's a sure sign that type of thinking is second nature for them. Star of David/money association, 88, gas chamber, David Duke, my African-American, alt-right associations, the judge is Mexican, not renting to black people, birther, Pocahantas...this isn't a conspiracy. It's who this family is.", '>>{RajivFernanDatBribe} : When will anyone notice that Trump plagiarized Bill Clinton\'s racist dog whistle slogan from his campaigns and from Hillary\'s 2008 run? "Time to Make America Great Again. I know Hillary\'s the one who can do it." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rj5uVCA2sg', '>>{TheTelephone} : They\'re really reaching here. The US used gas chambers through the 1990\'s, more recently than the electric chair. "Sending someone to the gas chamber" is not an anti-semetic phrase. I don\'t even like Trump or Trump Jr, but harking this back to the Holocaust is pretty tasteless on part of the DNC and a lot of commenters here on Reddit. If someone can tell me without hyperbole how uttering the word "gas chamber" is anti-semetic, please do tell.', '>>{ward0630} : >The US used gas chambers through the 1990\'s You know that\'s not what he meant. >If someone can tell me without hyperbole how uttering the word "gaschamber" is anti-semitic, please do tell I don\'t know if you read his comments, but he didn\'t just say the word "gas chamber." He said that the GOP would be sent to the gas chamber if it did what Hillary has done. In that context, it\'s an obvious reference to the Holocaust, which is what most people associate gas chambers with. Whether he was making a crude joke or if this is something he sincerely believes doesn\'t matter. It\'s extremely offensive for the son of a wealthy real estate guy and presidential candidate to compare his party to Holocaust victims.', ">>{TheTelephone} : What a dense explanation. You're offended for the sake of being offended. You read into it your way, and I read into it my way. We have different readings of it, but you say mine is wrong and yours is right, because you would rather have something to be outraged over.", ">>{Uxbridge42} : How dare he take the left's favourite attack from them! Only Dems get to call people nazis!", ">>{ward0630} : >What a dense explanation It was only two paragraphs. >You're offended for the sake of being offended No, I'm offended that Eric Trump thinks it's okay to compare the media asking for his daddy's tax returns to being gassed to death. >You say mine is wrong and yours is right You literally asked me to explain how Junior's comments were anti-Semitic. Don't start whining that I didn't answer your question the way you wanted. >You would rather have something to be outraged over When surrogates for presidential candidates start comparing media scrutiny to mass murder, then yes, I'm going to be outraged over it. Some things are worth getting worked up over.", ">>{TheTelephone} : Dense meaning shallow. I'm honestly offended at everyone here's using the Holocaust as a political football. I think after the smoke clears, a lot of people ought to feel downright ashamed of themselves.", ">>{spookan} : I highly, HIGHLY doubt Trump's idiot boy knows anything about the history of capital punishment in the US. It's obvious what he was referring to.", ">>{ihavethebestwords} : > They're really reaching here. The US used gas chambers through the 1990's, You mean when Eric Trump was 10? Growing up in New York which never used gas as a method of execution? Yeah, I'm sure he was talking about that...", ">>{TheTelephone} : Everyone knows that the gas chamber was used in America. They don't hang people from the gallows anymore, but we all know that they DID. Such a stupid argument.", '>>{doog201} : Iv heard your first statement for every Trump "scandal." "You know that\'s not what he meant!" At what point do you stop to think that maybe you\'re drawing ridiculous conclusions?', '>>{dissaver} : he should have said "preparing the gallows."', ">>{doog201} : Why would you highly doubt that a person with his education doesn't know that the gas chamber was used as a popular method of execution in the US? Like him or not attacking Trump Jr. for being stupid is a losing battle.", ">>{Kildragoth} : I'm confused as to why it matters. It was used to compare the treatment by the media. If anything it seems like the media is warming up the gas chambers over this comment.", '>>{Bannakaffalatta1} : When every single Trump supporter doesn\'t bounce back with "But he didn\'t really mean that" anytime him or his surrogates say something offensive.', '>>{ihavethebestwords} : >Everyone knows that the gas chamber was used in America. They don\'t hang people from the gallows anymore, but we all know that they DID. Such a stupid argument. I don\'t really care what you think "everyone" knows. The salient question is, what is the connotation Eric Trump most likely associates with the use of "gas chamber?" Growing up a New Yorker well past the era when gas chambers were in frequent use in America, his most likely association is killing Jews. And if that wasn\'t his intent, if he really does picture, i don\'t know, Flash Gordon instead of Schindler\'s List when he thinks of gas chambers, then hes a fucking idiot for not knowing better. Occam\'s Razor says he\'s deplorable either way.', '>>{TheTelephone} : That\'s silly. If I say the word "science experiment" people don\'t immediately think of Japanese colonialism.', '>>{ihavethebestwords} : Lol. Terrible analogy. Wanna try for real?', ">>{Kildragoth} : What he meant to say was that the media would crucify them for lying. Wait, that would offend Christians. They would burn them at the stake. Wait, that'd offend witches. They would unleash a torrent of hot ash on them. Ah, damn, the Pompeians wouldn't appreciate that one. They would sink their ship. Descendents of the survivors of the Titanic would crash an airplane into my building over that one...", '>>{Lynx_Rufus} : The phrase has been in semi-common use since the 80s but k.', ">>{RajivFernanDatBribe} : So what you're saying is that the stupid phrase is not a racist dog whistle, which we've been told a thousand times?", '>>{exploding_growing} : Yeah, Ivanka seems like she escaped the worst of his traits, but father and sons... wow.', '>>{OctoberSurpriseParty} : Did Jews die from gallows? If so, anti semantic!!', '>>{OctoberSurpriseParty} : The context: media controles by jeeeeeeeeews. Jews gas chamber, anti semantic!!', ">>{beatyatoit} : hmmmm...so you're comparing the way that millions of people...men, women and children, were taken to camps, placed in gas chambers, and killed as part of a final solution to rid the world of a specific group of people, to Christ, witches, and people that died via a natural catastrophe? You are a Trump supporter to the core, aren't you?", ">>{beatyatoit} : you're right; Ivanka seems to have retained some empathy; the males, on the other hand...like father, like sons.", '>>{spookan} : Because a) He only has a bs, which is below the standard level of education for someone that wealthy and influential, b) his degree is in econ and c) I know plenty of well educated morons who know little about anything outside their field of chosen study.', '>>{Kildragoth} : No, actually. The meaning behind each example is that there\'s an overreaction to something. It\'s a metaphor meant to be interpreted figuratively. If someone says "god damn it" do you stop them and lecture them that God shouldn\'t waste even unlimited resources focused on something so trivial?', ">>{doog201} : Only has a bachelor's degree huh? Since when does having a bs make you dumber than average? And people you know, do you know Trump Jr? Because it sounds like you're talking out of your ass with wild speculation.", '>>{OtroGatoGordo} : Ivanka is an enabler. Her children are Jewish.', '>>{OtroGatoGordo} : I hate Trump and the spawn of Satan his whole family is, but please ELI5, why is he saying "physical punishment"?', '>>{Muskworker} : It says he said corporal punishment - presumably they mean capital punishment. Gas chambers are still a [legal method of execution used in some states](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_chamber#United_States) (though apparently the last such execution was back in 1999).', '>>{95Kill3r} : That racist nazi Microsoft paint frog he is destroying this society!', '>>{IHave9Dads} : The difference is, I\'ve never once in my life heard anybody say "Warming up the gas chambers" without it being related to the holocaust, people say "goddammit" all the time, they say "crucify" all the time to and it\'s not related to religion.', '>>{buzzlightlime} : So public criticism of the rich and powerful is equivalent to the systematic slaughter of an minority group?', ">>{buzzlightlime} : That's how you take down an out of touch aristocracy", '>>{Kildragoth} : How was it related to the Holocaust? He\'s suggesting he\'d be victimized by the media. It\'s obvious the media wouldn\'t literally fire up an actual gas chamber and lead the Trump family into it, so why are you or anyone else taking it literally? The crucify example can be specific to Christianity or just as a torture device. No one who says "they\'ll crucify me if I\'m late again" actually equates themselves to a person who starves to death while nailed to a cross in the sun.', '>>{Kildragoth} : >So public criticism of the rich and powerful is equivalent to the systematic slaughter of an minority group? If I say "I\'ll be crucified if I\'m late to work" am I saying someone will actually nail me to a cross to starve to death? I\'m saying I\'ll be in a lot of trouble. Replace "crucified" with "thrown in the gas chambers" and how is this different, except of course in the context of a presidential election?', '>>{IHave9Dads} : I\'m saying who has ever said "Warming up the gas chambers" as a reference to scrutiny?', ">>{Kildragoth} : I've never heard it before either. Though he probably uses it often.", '>>{EllenPaosFrontButt} : >What a dense explanation >It was only two paragraphs. Holy shit are you memeing right now?', ">>{spookan} : I mentioned his degree because you mentioned his education as if it was something special. I wouldn't expect the average econ major to have a particular knowledge of those practices. But even if they did, why would they expect the general public to? I mean, it is a much wilder speculation to assume that he's alluding to something obscure versus something well known. I don't even think it was that big a deal, compared to everything his father has said. People can't handle any criticism of the Trumps or they would be able to admit that this was a slip of the tongue."], ['>>{LightsOut5774} : This subreddit is so much nicer than /r/Apple.', '>>{IPAsRule} : Not only that, over there the stupid moderator bot constantly removes valid pertinent questions.', '>>{LightsOut5774} : True that dude. I actually tried to make a post a couple days after iOS 10 launched saying that my iPad was much slower after the update, and if anyone else was with a 4th gen iPad was facing any issues. Lo and behold, the damn bot removed it', ">>{mmaireenehc} : Yeah. I also like that people here are more understanding that it's not always about Apple. You know, like it's possible for someone to have an iPhone and still use Windows PCs.", ">>{Ultrawideband} : Boop. Bop. Beep. Who you callin' stupid? (just kidding : )", ">>{DAEFlair} : I got banned from Apple about a year ago for telling them to calm the fuck down. They're impatient 12 year olds who knee jerk to everything", '>>{Samueul} : I think /r/apple just attracts more trolls in general.', ">>{Samueul} : After today's keynote, we are going to see lots more of that :)", ">>{Atlas26} : As someone who does exactly this, and will continue to (as I see the importance of MacOS declining in Apple's vision, which admittedly is purely speculative. That said, convergence of mobile and desktop is happening across the board, and Apple would be wise to not ignore such trends...), it works out great for me.", '>>{Atlas26} : Avoid at all costs, that sub is toxic AF haha', '>>{Rickdrizzle} : I agree. Definitely nicer than the Android sub as well.', '>>{Atlas26} : /r/Android has basically been imploding with toxicity over the past year or so', '>>{shmangit69} : I noticed this too even with just reading the comments people leave in each thread. Definitely some good people here. Cheers! Keep it up!', '>>{Rickdrizzle} : I see that as well. I have both an iPhone and an android and I like to read up on both regarding to news, experiences people have, and so on. Lots of negativity there lol', '>>{trumpetmuppet} : Former /r/Android dude. When I switched to the 7 I went over to /r/Apple and was immediately disappointed with how technically ignorant they were over there (and very troll-y). Very happy I found this place.', '>>{tensai_76} : The first day I switched to iOS from Android (Nexus/Samsung Refugee) I visited the Apple sub. No way would I stay there. I found this sub by accident too having found the iOS 10 beta sub and learning how to download the betas (I got my phone with 9.2 so I was anxious to try 10) So thank you too all the people here that make this place decent and less elitist', '>>{dfuqt} : I post in /r/apple, /r/iphone and /r/ipad. There are some great people in all of them, but there are bad ones too. It\'s funny that you\'ve posted this after today\'s event, as a quick look over in /r/apple right now highlights the problem it has with people who defend Apple and their products like it\'s their job. And I really mean "like it\'s their job". People posting dozens of times a day, every day for years. Literally thousands of posts, and not a single one of them contains a remotely negative comment about Apple. Even in the face of legitimate issues they will spin it around. You start to recognise them after a while, and I could name at least six off the top of my head to prove my point. But that would be against the rules, and would ultimately be unfair. I guess people are entitled to their opinions. They aren\'t entitled to be quite as snarky and downright aggressive about it though. For what it\'s worth, such people are in the minority. And the mods are great. You very often see people going waaaaay to far. But within minutes the posts are gone.', ">>{SgtPepe} : They should do a poll and see how many users truly own a recent macbook. There's so much whining...", ">>{Whodiditandwhy} : It's largely because the sub is full of equal parts Apple fans and trolls.", '>>{Trickster174} : Apple updated their MacBook Pro line. After years of waiting, it was underwhelming and alarmingly expensive.', ">>{dfuqt} : If the bot hadn't removed it you would have been downvoted to oblivion anyway. Hissing iPhones, performance issues, battery problems, comments on low light camera performance - nobody wants to talk about that. But you post a simple statement that Apple are great, and that's your karma for the year sorted right there.", '>>{DAEFlair} : Dunno they were complaining about how they were talking about sales numbers or whatever for the first 10 minutes like they always do.', '>>{eighteencircle9} : Is it not better than Surface Pro by Microsoft?', '>>{XenuXVII} : I agree! We are a great community 😁🍺🙌🏻😋✌🏻️', ">>{eRWT} : Yep, I used to be hardcore about everything windows (including phone) but I'm currently really enjoying my new iPhone 7 along with my Surface Pro 4 and desktop PC.", '>>{rollsie7} : People over at /r/jailbreak are very helpful as well', ">>{Methaxetamine} : Better but not great. Today they downvoted someone for saying they use juice cards to add data and saying you shouldn't have and iPhone if you don't have a data plan. I was downvoted for being able to pay my own phone bill. Many more you'll see. The nicest one is by far /r/jailbreak", '>>{T-Nan} : I would argue, no. At least, the changes from the SP 3 to 4 was way better than the upgrade for the new macbook', '>>{astalavista114} : I think part of the problem is that every time there is a major Apple announcement (like the one just gone) a ton of people come to read the sub. Unfortunately, some of them come to just argue how terrible Apple are (sometimes for reasonable reasons, like wanting their headphone jacks [I\'m on the fence there. Its probably a touch too early really, but someone major has to make the leap, and if Apple doesn\'t, I don\'t think anyone will really go for it] to unreasonable ones like "OMG the retina MacBooks only have core-M processors and that means they are shit."), and that - particularly the latter - gets people\'s hackles up. Do I like *everything* Apple has ever done, or even everything they\'ve done in the last couple of years? No. For one, they\'ve really got to clean up their naming scheme across their products (the MacBooks are getting there with the death of the 11 inch MBA - although the absolute bottom end new MBP doesn\'t help things much), particularly in the iPad line - iPad Mini (one size), iPad Air (one size), iPad Pro (two sizes, one of which is the same as the Air). Get your shit together! And I would like the Cheese Grater back too. Yeah, the Trash Can looks neat, but it isn\'t as extendable as the Grater was. But on the whole, they\'re doing pretty good.', '>>{astalavista114} : Let me guess - WWDC, when they *always* highlight that the majority of the Apple Userbase are on the latest version of their OSes (and that users of other OSes are not) to encourage devs (which is primarily who they are presenting to) to use the new features they are announcing? A couple of times at other events they\'ve done about 30 seconds on sales numbers and just said "Well, we sold a shit tonne of products and everyone is using 10.WhateverTheMostRecentVersionIs and iOS Whichever. Here\'s new stuff!", and therefore they should always do that. Right?', ">>{mayaisme} : Sometimes I think /r/apple is made up of more android users than iPhone users. It's almost like it's a sub to hate on apple", ">>{astalavista114} : To be fair, the SP3 needed a *lot* of improvements to deal with its issues. Performance and spec wise, I actually quite like the SP4, and I think it's a fantastic device, but it's not the right device for me (Windows is the killer, unfortunately - although I do have a desktop running Windows for when I need it). (sosumi) As for judging whether the improvements are worth it for the MBP - I'll have to wait and see what the reviewers say. There's Apple's claimed performance improvements which are pretty damn good, but those are probably under optimal conditions. As for connectivity - put it like this: It's well suited for the future. 4 TB3 ports (so 2 5K monitors? Why not?), although power is also provided through there as well (so long MagSafe!), so if you don't have an external device that can also power over that connection (some monitors can, for instance), you'll need one of the ports to provide power to the MacBook itself. But in the here and now, it's a bit like the headphone jack on the iPhone - probably a year or two too soon, but because they've done it others will follow, making the change to USB-C and Thunderbolt 3 actually happen (hopefully).", ">>{iranintoavan} : I would argue yes. Basically the same price spec wise. Likely better build quality. Much better trackpad and keyboard. Bigger and better quality screen. 4 thunderbolt 3 ports. Much faster storage. Runs macOS. I suppose if you really want to use it as a tablet it wins but from what I've heard it's not very good at being a tablet.", ">>{tombiscuit} : One of the massive flaws of Reddit is that there can only be one /r/Apple, and all subreddits are governed by moderators who are unaccountable and unelected. It's nearly impossible to track and question moderator decisions unless they happen to you. And some subreddits have an enormous amount of power.", ">>{DaytonaZ33} : Trust me, it's mostly because trolls use /r/apple. Around any keynote or product launch it's basically impossible to have any sort of real reaction from Apple fans, as it's all people from other subs coming to say the same things over and over. Jobs rolling in grave, Apple is doomed, etc etc.", '>>{tensai_76} : A reflection of human society through the corridors of history.', '>>{DJ-Salinger} : Thankfully, no one can lie on the internet.', ">>{DJ-Salinger} : /r/Apple near a keynote is much different than what it's normally like.", '>>{DocFunkinstein} : As a recent convert this sub is also better than r/android as well. The android circle jerk sub Reddit I feed better for info and comments', ">>{hanssone777} : /apple and /android is a shitfest with fanboys from both sides arguing in a keyboard warrior's battlefield. /googlepixel is a more nicer side of android, so go figure yeah", ">>{neoookami} : Probably better to compare the Surface Book to the MacBook Pro really, since both are laptops first. Especially when both have base models at the same price point. (Though you can go cheaper on the Surface Book if you go with half the storage.) With the Surface you're passing on the dedicated GPU in the keyboard at that price point. With the MBP you're passing on the Touch Bar and getting half as many Thunderbolt ports", '>>{DJ-Salinger} : Yea...the day after is still near the Keynote.', ">>{Atlas26} : I'm a windows user, but it's at least ballpark competitive...to me, anyway.", '>>{Atlas26} : What do you mean by technically ignorant? In what ways?', '>>{tombiscuit} : Literally by creating the subreddit, or asking an existing mod if you can join them.', '>>{KuKuMacadoo} : As an Apple guy, I much prefer /r/Android. The Apple community in general is terrible on Reddit.', '>>{pongmanJ25} : You\'re right about that! I was perusing that sub last night, digesting the blowback from the Apple Special Event and I came across a question about an iPhone--a mundane and honest question but valid nonetheless. I forget the question, but one of the comments was like (paraphrasing), "You know, if questions like these frequent the Subreddit too much, then it becomes bland and useless; if they don\'t have the sense to use the search feature, then they\'re dumb." As I see it, the more posts, the merrier! The more questions, even better! Edit: And, yes, the folks here are very helpful, great spirited, and courteous 😊😃 The /Galaxynote7 sub is great, too!', '>>{thewimsey} : Yes...but they are both 100 times better than /r/technology ...', '>>{Boscolt} : I uhh... I thought this WAS r/apple until just now...'], [">>{JimLahee} : I wish I liked any of the candidates enough to vote. The third party candidates are even weak. Johnson can't stop fucking up on foreign policy. Jill Stein is unqualified and too immature to be president. And Donald and Hillary are pretty self-explanatory. This election is by far the worst when it comes down to the choices.", '>>{JacobCrim88} : We will be no better than the Baby Boomers if we do this and Trump wins.', ">>{kyonu} : There won't be 1896 on the ballot, though. And writing them in, in most states, they will just get thrown out.", ">>{JimLahee} : How many are actually going to be on the ballots and actually counted though? You can use that argument, but unless third parties get recognized to where I can branch out from the green party and libertarian, which won't until we fix our election processes, it's hard to support one of those many candidates, especially when majority won't be on my ballot to vote for.", ">>{nphased} : Why, voting for lesser evils got us here. I'm voting for a third party candidate this year. The two major candidates are just not qualified.", '>>{BattleofAlgiers} : Not this millennial. Donald is not getting those nuclear codes.', '>>{BattleofAlgiers} : So Jill Stein and Gary "literally knows nothing about international relations" Johnson are?', '>>{Antnee83} : Millennials are most likely to not remember what happened in 2000.', ">>{nphased} : I like Jill's plan of stepping back from so many foreign entanglements. We're on track to spend 6 Trillion dollars on our foreign wars!! I'll take her plan over Clinton who is an expert in state affairs but is a war hawk. Clinton is the smart person who doesn't have any wisdom. I think people are being a bit unfair to Gary especially on the first issue, but the second gaffe is going to hurt him.", ">>{kstinfo} : A reasonable person - you won't last long around here.", ">>{JimLahee} : Unfortunately, I agree. I'm not an advocate for Clinton by any means, but a Donald Trump presidency is becoming more realistic and terrifying. And that supreme court nomination is extremely important. If we get another Scalia, we'll be stuck in same boat sinking for an even longer period of time.", ">>{bottomdenominator} : The Dems ran a candidate so boring he couldn't win his home state. That's what happened in 2000. This year they are running one who is so much worse. They'll get what they deserve.", '>>{BattleofAlgiers} : Americans picking their President\'s based on how boring they are and if they\'d like to "drink a beer with them" is the real problem IMO. As you illustrate. The job is hard and complicated. I don\'t want an average joe for a nuclear physicist and I don\'t want an average joe for a President.', '>>{bottomdenominator} : Why did you put quotes on that? Are you quoting someone? If so - could you link it? Maybe Gary needs better writers. Or maybe he should control access so that only the special media gets to ask him questions that he wrote so that he never gets ambushed. What Foreign Leader do you admire?', '>>{BattleofAlgiers} : I get backing out of foreign entanglements, that\'s fair. But I don\'t see how you can argue that Jill Stein is "qualified." Her highest elected position is on a local town council. Would you promote a Freshman Bio major to Surgeon General because "she had some good ideas?" I\'m sorry but it bothers me that people think the Presidency is a job that anybody can just step into without any legislative or executive experience. Forget politics. I\'m talking about understanding the process of lawmaking and understanding the more complicated aspects of our government. Obama was a constitutional scholar ffs. I\'m legitimately concerned that she doesn\'t understand the economy. She opposed raising the debt ceiling - which tells me she has a fundamentally flawed understanding of the national debt. Free higher public education is a mirage. It helps those who can already afford college more than those who can\'t because it conveniently ignores what really prevents people from affording college. Housing, food, books, laptops and the opportunity cost of not working. Her idea to institute quantitative easing to forgive student loan debt just doesn\'t make sense. She can\'t even explain it. This is what she said about it: > magic trick that basically people don\'t need to understand any more about than that it is a magic trick I mean, jesus, she may as well be selling snake oil. Beyond that, I personally think that her military policy is a joke. Close all overseas bases and cut spending by at least 50%? Beyond the obvious, can we talk about what she plans to do with the influx of recently unemployed and disgruntled young men with weapons training? What will they do for work? I simply don\'t agree with her from a strategic perspective but I suppose that\'s a fairly legitimate disagreement (though I don\'t know where she has the credibility to speak on foreign relations..at all). As for Johnson, I\'m sorry but those aren\'t gaffes. The President\'s primary responsibility is our foreign relations. The election is a job interview. This is a man revealing that he is inadequately prepared for the job for which he is applying. If I was his job interviewer, I would have ended the interview right then and there.', '>>{bottomdenominator} : My point was Gore was such a shitty politician that he couldn\'t carry his home state. I wouldn\'t want to drink a beer with anyone who uses drone strikes that kill children to take out our "enemies" in Pakistan. I also wouldn\'t want to have a beer with a racist. To be honest, I don\'t drink. Looks like Gary is my guy.', ">>{liberationation} : If you don't live in a close swing state, your vote will not sway the election. Voting third party has more meaning in those places than elsewhere.", ">>{BattleofAlgiers} : This is the wrong question to ask a person with a degree in International Relations. It's hard to ADMIRE foreign leaders as they are complicated figures. Leaders in general. You don't get to where you are without cracking a few eggs so to speak. I don't admire them because I don't aspire to be them. That said, I do see foreign leaders who I agree with on a high-level philosophically. Canada's Justin Trudeau would be one. While I worry about the Hindu-nationalist aspects of his party, Prime Minister Narendra Singh Modi seems to be doing an alright job in India. Angela Merkel has not only kept Europe afloat during some seriously turbulent economic times but Germany is one of the engines of the global economy. If we take it further back in history. Deng Xiaopeng is certainly a complicated figure but you have to respect how diligently he transformed China from a communist country into one of the largest capitalist economies in the world. Similarly, Lee Kwan Yu in Singapore didn't exactly run a liberal democracy but he lso created one of the most successful and richest countries on the planet, in like...50 years. Obviously a figure like Neslon Mandela stands out. Frankly, I can name far more foreign leaders who were idiots, despots, assholes etc. But again, it bothers me that a Presidential candidate knows less about major international relations players than I do. It's one thing if he doesn't completely understand the dynamics behind the India-Pakistan conflict or the proxy groups involved or the history of the conflict. Those are the kinds of things we have experts for. But knowing important foreign leaders and locations? That's a matter of preparation and just giving a fuck. That was a quote because it's clearly not his real middle name.", ">>{BattleofAlgiers} : Well let's be honest, the only reason Gary won't launch a drone strike in the Middle East is he doesn't know where it is. I can be opposed to drone strikes and have it outweighed by the fact that I don't think that Gary Johnson has the intelligence or understanding to protect us with a dramatically decreased military. He hasn't shown a good enough grasp of international affairs.", '>>{bottomdenominator} : Do you think Obama knows where Aleppo is? What in the hell is he doing about it and how will Hillary handle it any differently? They allow the fires to burn in Aleppo because it suits their endgame. A vote for Hillary is surely a vote for dead children.', '>>{nphased} : I\'ll take Jill over either Clinton or Trump. I\'m not sure what is so magical about legislative experience, all it really means is that you\'ve hung around a lot of lawyers and kicked around in the same halls of power that have given us a leadership that got us here. Our current terrible presidential candidates are proof that the "qualifications" you hold so dear are not the kind of experience that is productive of good decisions. Jill is a medical doctor and an activist, she\'s smart and can organize and has identified key issues for the prosperity of our nation. I\'ll take someone who has the right goals in mind and might make a few mistakes and changes getting there over someone who knows every rule, but somehow keeps managing to do the wrong thing or skirt the spirit and the letter of the rules knowingly.', '>>{BattleofAlgiers} : > Do you think Obama knows where Aleppo is? What in the hell is he doing about it Oh you mean how ISIS is constantly losing territory and resources?', ">>{BattleofAlgiers} : > might make a few mistakes and changes getting there Mistakes made by Presidents are often measured in body counts. It's not magical buddy. Experience makes you better at most jobs. All else being equal, who do you trust as a medical doctor? A first-year intern or an attending physician?", ">>{nphased} : Clinton's body count is already high and she shows irrational signs of looking for more in her foreign policy. Trump - I don't even know what his policies are - take your pick of his many positions.", ">>{choppingbroccolini} : When the two parties are corrupt, you don't have much choice if you wish to respect your values and maintain your integrity."]]

classify and reply

['>>{ZoneRangerMC} : MIT built a gel-based claw robot that can catch and release live fish', '>>{SymbioticPatriotic} : How Millenials Watched - And Responded To - The First Debate', '>>{elpadrin0} : Apple Releases iOS 10.2.1 With Bug Fixes, Performance Improvements', '>>{phonetechguru4} : The symptoms you are describing match those of a failing battery. I would suggest having Apple replace your battery. If that option is not economical enough for you, a third party battery replacement is generally cheaper-- but no matter where it is done, there is always a chance that the battery you get is not 100% new or authentic Apple.', '>>{DeathVoxxxx} : Still not showing up on my phone. EDIT (1 hour later): It does now.', '>>{Seventh_______} : >The transparent fish grabber was created with funds from the Office of Naval Research, the MIT Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies and the National Science Foundation. This is the only thing in the entire article indicating why "MIT" is credited for building it. Was it MIT like the actual academic institution? No. was it some department of MIT, the academic institution? Kind of. Funded by one at least, *possibly* built there too. But then why disregard the other two funding organizations? With this in mind, I can only assume the author threw MIT into the title to namedrop a flashy school name with a crazy reputation. I have a major gripe with this...', '>>{gabrielquilez} : Usually every 8-10 days I would turn off my phone since I understand that having it on all the time can be hurtful.', ">>{PavelDatsyuk} : So since it's been years since my last iPhone(I had the 4) what's the general consensus about iOS updates? Do I try to update ASAP or do I wait to see if other people have problems?", ">>{PusherofCarts} : Don't need ya Mikey, we got you by the balls!", '>>{SymbioticPatriotic} : >"About 350 college Republicans and Democrats came together at Georgetown University in Washington, DC, to watch the first presidential debate. Graduate student...plans to vote for Green Party candidate Jill Stein, because she says both Clinton and Trump don\'t pay enough attention to climate change and the collapse of the middle class." This echoes what I\'m hearing when I go door-to-door. Everybody has a climate change concern to share, and an anecdote about how the collapsing middle class affects their household. Millennials today are looking for a choice that champions climate and economic justice, and those who\'ve done their research are picking Jill Stein to be the next President.', ">>{money_loo} : Just a wild guess, but I think it's to catch and release live fish.", ">>{creepydarkwurm} : Fish can swim really fast, and it's particularly stress full on them to be chased by a net. I could see this being much easier to catch and less stress.", ">>{retnuh730} : It's prob safe to wait at least a few hours in case a nasty bug decides to surface.", '>>{philmtl} : I could see this working in aquaculture, need to get the fish out some how, especially for valuable and delicate aquarium fish', '>>{NarcolepticMan} : >Millennials now have roughly the same potential voting power as the boomer generation — each have 69 million registered voters. If millennials voted at the same rate as boomers — 68 percent in 2012 — they could have a huge impact on this election. Its only a matter of time until we put their mistakes behind us.', '>>{gabrielquilez} : Do you know how much would replacing a battery would cost me with an Apple Store? Or can you recommend a good third party battery I could buy?', '>>{lalallaalal} : And start making our own! The circle of life.', '>>{mytwofingers} : Having the same issues as you right now. Also tried everything you have to fix the battery life but to no success. Planning to visit an Apple Store over the weekend and reaching some sort of solution.', ">>{Razbyte} : Just wait for the rollout. For me in GMT -5 is now available. But I recommend you don't update it: remember what happened with iPhone 6s users, when the battery was draining fast after the last update?", ">>{-ThuggedOutCubScout-} : I'm at work. Can someone post a screenshot of the OTA changelog screen?", '>>{Spectre211286} : They could still subpoena him Although the entire hearing would be 2 or 3 hours of I plead the 5th', '>>{nebson10} : This is not a robot. There are no sensors or control systems. This is a gel-based puppet.', '>>{Blubbll} : delete snapchat? also see BatteryLife from the appstore how much mAh youve got left... using these social apps plus charging it the wrong way destroys the battery way faster than usual...', '>>{lalallaalal} : No Bernie, Jill, or Gary to stroke it to.', ">>{SwarlsBarkley} : Because they're not old enough to remember Nader? Or because they think it won't matter? Risky move, millennials. Edit: >If he were voting in a different state, though, he says his choice might be different. “There are so many things that millennials care about that Trump does not care about, so if you’re voting third party in a swing state, you risk Trump. Never mind. I didn't fully read the article. Rock on, millennials.", ">>{Lord_Von_Fappington} : [It doesn't say much.](http://i.imgur.com/GZkguDp.jpg)", '>>{PM_ME_DICK_PICTURES} : Probably $200 out of warranty. I used eTradeSupply and got my 5S battery for $10 but shipping killed me :/. You can buy a screw kit for around $5 on Amazon or eBay. You could probably find better prices, look around on /r/mobilerepair', ">>{Cockamamy_Cosmonaut} : Yeah, that's what I thought the last time this was posted", '>>{dagrave} : No need if they have what they have already. Besides he is a traitor and does not deserve any clemency.', '>>{MuresMalum} : This time, can we *not* shove this awkwardly into the megathread?', ">>{Mad_at_reddit} : Either they don't need his testimony because they already know what he does. Or the information he has isn't the smoking gun on Trump they were looking for. Hopefully it's the former.", '>>{iPerilous} : should I install now or is it best to wait and see if any bugs show up?', ">>{Badpreacher} : It's because MIT designed and built it with grants from them. http://news.mit.edu/2017/transparent-gel-robots-catch-release-fish-0201", ">>{KingCupboard} : But she won't be the next president, she has absolutely no shot. And you put Donald Trump that much closer to the White House, who is the antithesis of everything you say matters to you. This particular election is too important for the future (your future) to wax poetically about idealism.", ">>{Vgutierrez96} : I'm on beta 3 now getting the best battery life I have ever got. Should I update or not? Also do the betas expire?", ">>{farkhipov} : I like how they don't know what real-world applications their gel robot will/can have, but HERE IT IS", '>>{farkhipov} : humans are robots hey! you changed your comment now my reply makes no sense! ಠ_ಠ', '>>{lilzoe5} : Get Battery Life & if your capacity is below 80% then you need to get it replaced. https://itunes.apple.com/app/id1080930585', '>>{sparr} : The list you quoted are the people who paid for it. It was actually designed and built by a group of engineers and researchers at MIT-the-actual-academic-institution.', '>>{SymbioticPatriotic} : One must always reach for ideals in their voting. That is what makes America the shining democracy on the hill.', ">>{RestInPvPieces} : Its very likely that they have enough on him already and are moving on to bigger fish and don't want him and others to know where they are heading.", '>>{Mintergirl42} : What do you mean by charging it the wrong way?', '>>{sparr} : Various research efforts want to tag fish so their migration and such can be tracked. Catching fish in a net is dangerous to the fish.', ">>{datworkaccountdo} : I was not able to watch it all but what I did see was two grown people who are running to run the country bicker and dig at each other like school children. Rather appalling I must say. This is also the first debate presidential debate I have watched so I cannot say if this is the norm. My response to the debate is as we get older and replace the boomers let's not repeat the sins of are forefathers.", ">>{littlebitsofspider} : THANK YOU. This stupid article is driving me nuts because it's *everywhere* and *every* title is wrong. This is a gel-based *actuator*, and it's not very useful at all.", '>>{lubbocksfall} : Looks like the update is bigger than Beta 4. Factory reset and go with Public Release.', ">>{ItsDarts} : It's been my experience that others always have problems. If you've had little to no problems in the past, upgrade. If you've had problems with many updates, be sure to have a pc or Mac around and use iTunes to update. My wife for some reason, typically has problems, so we dig out the never used laptop. For me, I usually update within the first day or two and do it ota.", ">>{i-am-sancho} : He probably has nothing to offer. They'd only grant it to him if he has information they cannot get from other sources. They don't need him. And also, he might be the highest person whom they can actually pin any specific crimes on.", ">>{Mad_at_reddit} : 5th only protects you from providing evidence on yourself. Doesn't stop them from using their evidence on him though.", ">>{ReliableSource} : The betas expire, yes. You'll have to update eventually.", '>>{Master-Of-Reality} : America is not a Democracy, America is a Republic.', '>>{Blubbll} : like every 5 minutes, wrong charger, use it heavily by charging, directly charge it after it went off in winter and so on.', '>>{Dr_Drank} : I havent updated in weeks because the last update was causing phones to die randomly at like 50% for people i knew. Someone update me if this still happens', '>>{soicanshittalk} : Schiff tweet: "The public should learn a lot more about WHY General Flynn wants immunity when Sally Yates testifies before the House Intelligence Committee" Sounds like they don\'t need Flynn', ">>{nim_opet} : It's pretty cool. Glad there's a robot to grab my goldfish, I never liked getting my fingers wet :)", '>>{iscovisco} : No way 200 ..even screens are less expensive . In India where price is inflated a lot it was around Rs 7000 -8000 .', '>>{EllaShue} : Also, if you read the article, they haven\'t ruled it out in the future, only that at this point it was "wildly preliminary."', ">>{Mrjasonbucy} : Abduct me at 5pm, that's when I get off work.", ">>{Awsaim} : They *still* haven't fixed the glitch that puts a space before sharing a song via Apple Music's action menu, resulting in one blank message bubble and then the hot link to the song...", '>>{qwop22} : Apple, its about the little details...oh wait.', '>>{Slumdog_Million} : They probably want the big fish (Trump) and Flynn isnt going to give him up that easily on account of being poisoned, shot or thrown out of a building by the Putin regime.', ">>{i_like_tube_amps} : It's like you have no idea how modern academia work. People from universities (students, professors) will work on a project and companies who are interested in it will fund it either specifically or via a general fund pool.", '>>{TuLegit2quit} : My guess, in terms of the response, is with sadness and alcohol.', '>>{N0RDLE} : Where\'s this "dark mode" the YouTube celeb wannabes kept sayin was with this update then? Just talkin out their arses again?', ">>{i_like_tube_amps} : It's only invisible if they design an invisible pump and circuitry to drive it", ">>{92Hippie} : Abduct me at 8am, that's when I leave for work.", ">>{TuLegit2quit} : Gore lost his home state, he was a terrible candidate. His fault not Nader's.", ">>{abasu007} : I've got. 6 plus 64gb too. I would wait a day or two. When I updated to 10.2.1 my battery drained at a ridiculous rate. Wish I had waited a couple of day to see other people's reports...", '>>{d_mcc_x} : Worth noting that his lawyer is a Never-Trumper???', ">>{SSJ_JARVIS} : Did they fix how I can't watch videos on my correctly? Either the time stamp bar stays the whole time or I can't get rid of it...", '>>{ignaciobarrena} : Battery life should be a bit worse after updating right? I mean, the iPhone does some indexing and background processes for a few hours right ?', ">>{2650_CPU} : They probably all will reject him, it means that they can (or have) already gained enough information, and what Flynn can add is simply not worth it. Even if he is subpoenaed and pleads the fifth he's screwed and so are the rest of comrades.", ">>{InvaderDJ} : Waiting to update is always a good idea if stability is your first priority, but as someone who came back to iPhone after a long period like you (last iPhone was a 3G, now have 7 Plus) I haven't experienced any major issues with an update yet and I've gotten every iOS 10 update the day it launches. The novelty of that after being on Android since 2009 is still a thing for me.", '>>{Mind0Matter} : I wonder how many fish got crushed to death in the making of this robot.', '>>{wickedytg36} : Threatre Mode is suppose to come out on ios 10.3 lol, If you\'re on Jailbreak already a tweaks out for "Dark Mode" tho', ">>{TheVentiLebowski} : Abduct me whenever, I'm probably on Reddit instead of working.", '>>{MrVais} : After updating the phone feels much faster and smoother 👌🏼', ">>{rjhakes} : I was having connectivity issues with certain apps not loading properly. After update everything works like it should and is snappier. So for me it's a 👍🏻", ">>{SwarlsBarkley} : I never said it was Nader's fault. I'm saying millennials have a short memory or don't know their history if they think there's no downside in voting for Stein.", '>>{OkToBeTakei} : No. That\'s after a major release update, usually, or, sometimes, after a "point release" update (like 10.1 to 10.2). This seems to mostly be a maintenance update with some security and bug patches. It very probably won\'t do any reindexing like what you\'re thinking of.', '>>{TuLegit2quit} : There is no downside for voting for a candidate that you believe in.', ">>{SSJ_JARVIS} : No, I hadn't updated until two days ago. I had hoped it was fixed with the update but t wasn't. Am I the o my One having this issue?", '>>{SchwarzerKaffee} : Thus he would have to answer what Pence knew and when he knew it.', '>>{Montesquieuy} : Jerry the fish: No! Carl! Not again! Carl the fish: Jeeeery! *repeat 100 times*', ">>{CrimsonMoose} : Why don't you guys get abducted while at work so you don't waste your not-at-work hours?", ">>{verbose_gent} : It's not actually about helping the FBI or intelligence. It's about helping his sentencing later by establishing the appearance that he was helping as much as he could. His lawyers have been trying to make him look better for a while now. They also retroactively filed as a foreign agent for him and I'm sure many other things we haven't heard about.", '>>{Yodiddlyyo} : It would appear this comment is identical to the top comment from when this article was posted a few days ago.', '>>{shoes_stamps} : flynn and son going to guantanamo bay soon! if they were smart they would pack up and disappear to russia before their trials start', ">>{scofieldslays} : in which case the committee already knows what he would say and wouldn't need his testimony.", ">>{SwarlsBarkley} : If only that were true, friend. I'd be right there with you.", ">>{DaShata} : About the same as 10.2 for me I think... The update did fix like 15 vulnerabilities(CVE's) in iOS though which is always good", '>>{Dskotak} : Did it fix Bluetooth connectivity issues?!?!?', '>>{SymbioticPatriotic} : You are very wise for a first time debate watcher (and voter?). Share your wisdom freely. Maybe even campaign for office yourself. I like the way you view things.', ">>{Erra0} : Those aren't the only two options though. The investigation in the senate is just starting. The other option is that its too pre-mature to say one way or the other. Its more the two choices you lay out if we're talking about the FBI, though.", '>>{puppers_or_die} : |A senior congressional official with direct knowledge said Flynn\'s lawyer was told it was "wildly preliminary" and that immunity was "not on the table" at the moment.| Sorry for my ignorance but this seems to be an important part of the article and it is confusing to me. Can someone explain if this has any significance?', '>>{dhamon} : But does it only let you catch a fish after every 10 tries?', '>>{Kmon87} : You know when they have a fishing show on TV? They catch the fish and then let it go. They don\'t want to eat the fish, but they do want to make it late for something. "Where were you?" "I got caught!" "I don\'t believe you, let me see the inside of your lip." - Mitch Hedberg', ">>{Swimtothemoooon} : How about you testify, and we DON'T grant you immunity?", ">>{Dark_Fiber} : Sometimes for upgrading I'll read this sub Reddit to see what experiences people are having with the update just to be sure there aren't any show-stopping issues. In any case, it's always a good idea to run a full back up in iTunes before upgrading. Then, if there's a problem, you can just restore back to what you had before.", ">>{sunyeons} : copying this from r/apple but hopefully any iPhone 5s users here can help out. 10.2 bricked my 5S and I still regret updating to it. I had to go get it to a repair shop so they can restore my phone. Does it have any necessary fixed for the 5S users? To debate if I should really update it. I haven't had battery problems and such like the others. But I still run an older pc that isn't compatible with my iPhone so I can't attempt to update it via a computer.", ">>{Huckleberry_Win} : Important note: The sources that talked to MSNBC said that it's too early in the investigation to be thinking about immunity deals. This doesn't mean that they won't rethink it in a few weeks when they get further into the investigation.", '>>{Kitundu} : Another leap is made toward the gelatinous sex bot we all dream of.', '>>{NorbertDupner} : Well tell me. How will a President Trump further your hopes for the country to finally address climate change? How did George W. Bush advance the agenda of the Naderites?', ">>{hudson7557} : I get that it's cool and science and shit, but why? Of all the things you could develop or use this for we went after fish?", '>>{_Ninja_Wizard_} : Ahh, shit. The constraints were a bit much still. Got any sunfish left? ...."*Gaaaaaryyyyy is your turn to clean the tank*" Gary: Damnit, already?', '>>{PantsOnDaCeiling} : I thought they meant that they found a way to have a claw machine game that you can win fish from without harming the fish', '>>{archronin} : If only Jack Bauer was around, Flynn will get that immunity. Guaranteed.', '>>{rentaspoon} : What a waste of money, I can do this with a lemonade bottle', '>>{fjell_strom} : It ought come as no surprise that I just watched Newt Gingrich call Schiff a partisan hack - citing neither evidence nor anecdote - on Fox News', '>>{TheGrandNagusRom} : The first casualty of the Trump Train. No brakes till the bottom of the canyon.', '>>{FlyBlahTim} : Feels like that for me too. Updating placebo?', ">>{Samuel_L_Jewson} : There's a couple things to consider here. 1) The committees in Congress aren't pursuing criminal investigations like the FBI is, so I would think they would defer to the FBI on decisions regarding potential immunity. 2) They aren't going to want to provide immunity if it isn't needed. I think in Watergate they gave immunity to some people and later ended up regretting it because it wasn't necessary and prevented them from from getting justice.", '>>{OutOfStamina} : From the video >Becuase the robots are both powered and made almost entirely out of water, the researchers propose that hydrogel robots, if designed for underwater applications, may be entirely invisible. The video previously states that they use water-filled syringes as hydraulics to open/close the grabber hand. This is what they mean by "powered" by water (which is a strange way to use the phrase "powered by"). Something has to move the syringe, and that something isn\'t going to be transparent, and that part *won\'t* be powered by water. But I can see how having the hand that grabs be transparent is a huge deal.', '>>{Jon_Ham_Cock} : Team from MIT struggles to find pg friendly headline for new sex toy material.', '>>{SirCatMaster} : Well and the taste of peanut butter. Sweet delicious peanut butter.', '>>{Renovatius} : Battery life for the last 24 minutes is also astounding!', ">>{roflmyboxes} : Yeah, amazing, haven't even had to charge it.", '>>{stupidgate} : Oh, this is an exciting turn of events.', '>>{orlanderlv} : Looks like they aren\'t falling for the old "Let me fall on my sword for you, Donnie" routine.', ">>{SNIIIFFFF} : I fucking love Schiff. He's been incredible lately.", ">>{John_Tickle} : 'It's like, I don't want to eat the fish, but I do want to make it late for something' MH", ">>{Seventh_______} : Woah man let's not get hostile. I was critiquing the writing of the article. Even if you think it should be common knowledge, it's best to be explicit in journalism- besides, there are cases where that's not what happened", ">>{Awsaim} : Yeah, I even called them about it too and they told me they'd open a ticket. Turns out it's not very high on their priorities", '>>{AquaTriHungerForce} : This joke is so awesome and empathetic...love you Mitch.', '>>{Dark_Fiber} : It looks like it fixes some big security holes. https://www.wired.com/2017/01/new-ios-update-fixes-big-security-holes-get-now/', '>>{republicancer} : Is Yates scheduled to testify before the House Intelligence Committee?', '>>{c_double_u} : Does the Yates hearing have a date set yet?', '>>{farkhipov} : oh yeah! I completely forgot about taste and smell. I guess theres a *little* more to life than just pain. makes it a lot easier to understand why there are so many obese people', '>>{Insightfulcomment66} : You know they crushed some fish getting this right...', ">>{dragontology} : How often do you reboot your iPhone? Rebooting any computer gives yet a slight temporary performance kick. It's not exactly placebo, it's just working with a fresh cache. Old data no longer present etc. Take all this with a grain of salt as I'm still learning iPhone. I'm just talking about computers in general, which smartphones basically are.", ">>{EllaShue} : Can you imagine the steely resolve it takes to deal with Nunes sandbagging everything you do when you *know* what needs to be done? I don't know how Schiff can talk at all; I would have long since lost my voice from screaming in incoherent rage each morning when I saw his latest efforts to trash the House committee's investigations.", ">>{dragontology} : Glad I'm not the only one with this. Since iOS 10, Bluetooth takes 3x longer to turn on. I was advised to just leave it on all the time and it wouldn't impact my battery much when nothing is connected, and die enough it hasn't, so I have not turned it off. Might not be the danger problem though.", '>>{roleparadise} : Schiff might just be remembered in the history books as the one who brought down Trump. (And possibly 47th president of the United States.)', '>>{aledlewis} : Still not clear what he has done or knows but hopefully the best he can hope for is a plea-bargain in exchange for testimony.', '>>{FlyBlahTim} : Maybe once a week. Not often but not rare', '>>{Soros_Bucks_or_Bust} : They don\'t want another Ollie North where he takes the blame and walks away clean without taking down Reagan with him....Reagan should honestly have been impeached for Iran-Contra, but "i do not recall" worked wonders for him', ">>{Badpreacher} : I think the author of OP's article just read this one, since it came out 1 day before it.", '>>{timalexander} : It\'s technical name aside, its hard to call this "not useful". I imagine that if you study any type of aquatic animals that you want to catch without damaging, this looks like a game changing tool.', '>>{KantArgueWithThat} : Forget about aquarium, gently but firmly grabbing stuff is something most robots so far suck at. We can use them for handling a lot more stuff than just fish.', ">>{PM_ME_UR_DECOLLETAGE} : Indeed. Apple hasn't been receptive to all the beta feedback regarding this problem it seems.", ">>{40inmyfordfiesta} : You know I always see people saying stuff like this. But I have literally never had an issue with updates on my iPhone (knock on wood), and I'm sure I've done 50+ over the years.", ">>{Jaeger716} : No puppet!! You're the puppet... You're the puppet!", '>>{Scrubbing_Bubbles_} : In fairness to Gingrich, a lot of people FEEL that way. /s', '>>{ricodued} : ♫ *Real American herrroeeeesss* ♫ Today we salute you, Mr. House Intelligence Committee Not-Gonna-Take-Your-Bullshit Guy', '>>{vmcreative} : *robot penile implants. Are we ready for wetware based sex robots???', ">>{s-dubya} : Fast and forceful MIT-built gel-clawed robots! Fast and forceful MIT-built gel-clawed robots! Fast and forceful MIT-built gel-clawed robots! Hi, I'm S. Dubya, President and C.E.O. of Fast and Forceful MIT-built Gel-clawed Robots Emporium and Warehouse! Due to a hilarious misunderstanding with a local supervillian I am overstocked on Fast and forceful MIT-built gel-clawed robots, and I am passing the saving on to you!", ">>{littlebitsofspider} : I was probably a bit hasty in judging it... I'm sure there are use cases where this thing is mind-blowing. Just the friggin' terminology got to me...", ">>{stupidgate} : That's a bad spot for old Flynny, now all his co-conspirators know he's willing to sing.", '>>{drumming_is_for_men} : Look how gentle it is with this fragile exotic fish... imagine how great it will be drilling your vagina as fast as you can make it?', ">>{ophelia_jones} : Flynn's statement was a disappointment. It looked like it was going to be damage mitigation, rather than collaboration with investigations. Weird thing about the dudes around Trump is that they all seem to want to die on their swords defending him, but when things don't make sense and you push back against the narrative, the stories don't hold up. (I'm looking at you, Nunes.)", '>>{LeftHookGary} : Also gold fish are super slow and clumsy and easy to catch this seems very unimpressive.', ">>{Hypersapien} : What's hilarious is that my girlfriend found this exact same story on MetaFilter the same instant that I saw it here.", '>>{ItsJustAJokeLol} : Ahaha and Trump is still tying himself to Flynn on twitter. The only people stupider than this administration are the braindead jackasses who voted for them.', '>>{lorrika62} : They could modify it to catch invasive species fish so we can get them out of the wild so they are not competing with native fish.', ">>{Kglee54} : Once Trump's downfall is complete, we will be forced to heal as a nation. The huge irony in all of this, is that healing process can truly Make America Great Again. #MAGA2.0", '>>{overthrowthecactus} : I feel like the most important part of this is the little part at the end, where it explains that this is essentially an invisible underwater engine.', ">>{Commie_Stomp} : Sounds like they know they don't have shit but need to continue the bullshit narrative.", '>>{vapereasons} : 1 step closer to Covenant tech. I readily await my needler gun and plasma shields', '>>{nubuttah} : they had to make up a reason for developing a device to enhance their deficiency in picking up dates at the bar.', '>>{billthomson} : Perhaps the reason he wants this is the knowledge that they have recordings of his conversations?', '>>{Mrjasonbucy} : Haha this is a better version of my comment.', '>>{Fairchild22} : Virtually invisible robots under water. This might revolutionize naval warfare.', ">>{justinlancaster} : I'm very impressed with how composed he remains despite all the Nunes fuckery.", '>>{mildcal7} : Wow, I can finally get rid of that net that I currently use to grab fish.', ">>{koproller} : That's the thing with treason. Once you're in, you're all in.", '>>{seizurevictim} : I cannot wait for the day Newt Gingrich shits his pants during a heart attack and finally leaves this earth.', ">>{bejammin075} : I think immunity can be structured such that, if you don't do exactly what we want, you go to jail. I think they should find a way to have him testify, as long as it is agreed ahead of time what he will testify. Would make some great political porn.", ">>{thepasttenseofdraw} : So, you mean, hydraulics? I'm not sure what's so cool about this.", '>>{kuslap} : The investigation is only just beginning, so what Flynn knows can possibly still be uncovered without having to grant immunity.', '>>{47356835683568} : No, the researchers can change the settings if they want to make more profit. Most leave it at 1:20 unless someone gets cheeky and starts tossing in sturgeon or yellowtail.', '>>{dreamsquishy} : They should sell a service where for like a buck u can catch to fish and let ur kid pet it or some shit you will make some cash off that.', '>>{the_rabble_alliance} : > Sounds like they don\'t need Flynn Sounds like a lot of people do not need nor want Flynn. For example, the mods in /r/conspiracy flaired an article about Flynn\'s request for immunity as "ZERO INDICATION." http://i.imgur.com/ki2HGfe.jpg How a subreddit dedicated to conspiracies is missing out on the political conspiracy of the decade is baffling. Subsequently, the mods tried to justify the flair with by [a sticky stating that a House spokesperson denied Flynn was seeking immunity.](https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/62hjez/flynn_offers_to_testify_on_russia_ties_in/) I pointed out that Flynn appeared to to be negotiating with the Senate, if not the House (probably due to wariness about Nunes): > [A congressional aide confirmed that discussions with the Senate intelligence committee involved immunity. The aide spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations.](http://m.startribune.com/lawyer-michael-flynn-in-talks-with-congress-about-immunity/417730303/?section=politics) I was promptly banned for pointing this out.', '>>{Cory2020} : How much is the claw and where can I get it? Can I use it to scare lobsters?', '>>{eternal_septuagint} : I wish we would quit teaching [robots how to eat](https://www.wired.com/2009/07/military-researchers-develop-corpse-eating-robots/)', ">>{Holden_Coalfield} : It's a federal crime to lie to an FBI agent in the course of an investigation. That's how they get a grip on this. It's their pliers.", '>>{Byzantine279} : This was mostly just a proof of concept of the material used anyway.', '>>{cheese-sandwich99} : When I got accepted into MIT last month I was surprised, but also knew I had to be well above average to get in. But when I keep seeing some of their innovations featured on Reddit, I\'m just thinking, "damn some of these people make me feel like a doorknob"', '>>{justinlancaster} : I wonder if they already have what they need? Perhaps they wanna make him sweat and see if other rats come out of the woodwork?', '>>{IWasRightOnce} : Him personally probably, but this also likely means that they have no reason to believe that he possesses any (additional) smoking gun that directly implicates anyone else', ">>{concussion962} : This is probably the most important takeaway - and then the Administration doesn't have an easy fall-guy. If it shows that he has exclusive information that fries bigger fish? Then they may talk about immunity. But at this point? Him *offering* to testify (for immunity) is a good start, but *has the potential* to give immunity to the only person they can *find* evidence of. They're hedging their bets, and I'm OK with that.", ">>{ITGuy_higgins} : Has anyone heard the information he supposedly has yet? I wonder if they'll let the FBI handle Flynn and the Senate will focus on what they have with continual information coming from the FBI as their investigation goes on. If I remember right, the Oliver North incident was big issue with someone trying to get immunity from both Congress and the Feds at the same time.", ">>{nattack} : We are fast becoming the aliens of Science fictions past, It's grand.", '>>{ITGuy_higgins} : His legal team sent a letter to them as well.', ">>{scram_jones} : He's too boring to be president. Have we learned nothing from Gore, Kerry and Hillary?", '>>{stumpdawg} : The Claw decides who will stay, and who will go!', ">>{PusherofCarts} : I don't think that is right. The Senate IC investigation is just starting. You don't offer immunity before you even know what evidence you're gonna find on your own.", ">>{xjayroox} : They either want to nail him or don't think he's got something that adds to what they already know", ">>{IWasRightOnce} : >Has anyone heard the information he supposedly has yet? Well now that would entirely defeat the purpose of using it as leverage to gain immunity now wouldn't it", ">>{_Sasquat_} : YASSS! The fact that he offered to testify for immunity, at least in my mind, proves some very big shit has happened. The fact that his offer was rejected suggests they've got enough for prosecutions. HAHAHAHA!", '>>{LawlessCoffeh} : I mean the fish was kinda like "OH GOD WHAT THE FUCK WHAT IS HAPPENING TO ME" and then chill when released...', ">>{i-am-sancho} : I have no idea what he might have, but he's been with Trump every step of the way, from campaign to white house. And I'm pretty sure the senators on the committee would talk to the FBI regarding it all. There's been times in the past where congressional investigations ran concurrently to FBI investigations, like Watergate.", '>>{duckduck_goose} : I just see Schiff quietly making a point one day and Nunes interjecting some bs in when suddenly Schiff just punches him in the face quietly saying "shut the fuck up, asshole".', '>>{quantic56d} : Fucking robots man. Not even the fish are safe.', '>>{Tophurian} : Workers comp is provided through an insurance company. Unless there is an alien abduction clause they are probably going to deny you until the court forces them to honor it.', ">>{JoePesciOfGoneFishin} : The other option, sadly, could be that they really don't have hard evidence on Trump (likely because the Russian were smart enough to cover their tracks, something Trump would be too stupid to do). It could be that Flynn IS the biggest target they can charge at the end of all this.", ">>{IWasRightOnce} : I don't believe my statement contradicts that notion, at least I didn't mean for it to", '>>{Da_buddies} : Yea but can you teach fish to build a robot to catch MIT students? Now that would be impressive.', ">>{_personofdisinterest} : Wtf do you want, another reality TV star? Kim Kardashian? What's so boring about challenging the entire GOP? JFC.", '>>{Bergeron83} : You had to go and say that, and now we have to reason this out. Thanks. :-| I\'m thinking you could get an alien abduction from your workplace classified under an "act of God"? Or maybe the court would rule that the insurance company doesn\'t have to cover it because there\'s no way they could have calculated the risk of that event.', ">>{PusherofCarts} : It does in the sense that they may have a reason to believe he has a smoking gun, but they're not prepared to say they can't find it on their own (without having to grant immunity).", '>>{HamburgerSam} : Nobody is going to mention the typo? "... several minutes our hours"', '>>{ThePharros} : I thought the osmosis powered robot in the video was already pretty slow, then realized that was shown at 8000x speed.', ">>{HawkfireFilms} : I'm excited to see more advanced engineering done with hydro-gel and similar substances. Maybe interactions with non-water fluids and electrical charge. ^(The fact that MIT misspelled 'millinewton' and 'or' at 0:50 was really distracting though)", ">>{ITGuy_higgins} : What I mean is if he's had his Queen for A Day meeting yet, meaning: Someone requesting immunity goes in front of the FBI, or even Congress in this case, and offers a little info about their testimony without repercussion to see if that info is worth drawing up legal immunity papers for.", '>>{MinefieldTapdancer} : looks like someone figured out a way to give a goldfish a hug.', '>>{TransMeow} : But can it...you know. Help me out?', '>>{kashiihama} : Is there a hearing scheduled for Yates? I know the last one was canceled', '>>{JoePesciOfGoneFishin} : I downvoted your other comment because this one was much more urgent.', ">>{scram_jones} : I'm saying he's too boring to win a general election. Boring people don't win elections.", ">>{roleparadise} : If they didn't learn after Gore or Kerry, I doubt they learned after Hillary.", ">>{FiDiy} : This also opens the doors for others with deeper and wider inside knowledge to barter deals, rather than obstruct truth. As the ripples of Flynn's culpability contaminate others, they will in turn need to further turn and implicate a wider bunch. The poor white house plumber will be fishing out a lot of bricks from toilets", '>>{toeofcamell} : Give me boring over this bullshit any day of the mother fucking week', ">>{JizzBombMcGee} : Also fancy goldfish aren't the most agile strong beasts... Pretty easy to catch with anything.", ">>{itonlygetsworse} : STEP RIGHT UP STEP RIGHT UP. ALL YOU GOOGLY EYED FISH GATHER ROUND NOW. TAKE A LOOK AT THIS NEW STATE OF THE ART FANCY WATER ROLLERCOASTER RIDE. JUST STEP RIGHT IN THIS CLUTCHY THING AND BOOM, YOU'LL BE GOING UP AND DOWN AND LEFT AND RIGHT WITHOUT MOVING A FIN! Just $10 a ride.", ">>{duckduck_goose} : I actually don't agree. I think he has a lot of nuance which people mistake as boring persona", '>>{scram_jones} : Oh cool, are you the only person voting?', ">>{GhostFour} : I can't wait for one of these machines to show up at my local Dennys.", '>>{delticdiesel} : How much did this cost? We have perfectly good fishing rods for this', '>>{Dial-1-For-Spanglish} : I wonder if such robots could be used to hunt/catch/kill lionfish in the Caribbean.', '>>{nomnomnomnomRABIES} : We could have these on a conveyor belt for fishing without by catcn', '>>{annoyingrelative} : Put the dots together. Adam Schiff is a lawyer and knows his words have weight. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/03/schiff-there-is-more-than-circumstantial-evidence-now/520509/ Actually, no, Chuck,” Schiff said. “I can tell you that the case is more than that. **And I can’t go into the particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now**. … I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial, and is very much worthy of investigation.” Schiff tweeted today: https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/847791113620643840 The question for you, **Mr. President, is why you waited so long to act after you learned Flynn (through your VP) had misled the country?** Are you following **the Jester on Twitter?** The Jester suggested Trump is considering how this ends, and **resignation** is one possibility. He tweeted this late last night https://twitter.com/th3j35t3r/status/847633397090365442 Remember, Trump NEVER settles. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/30/us/judge-signals-he-will-approve-trump-university-settlement.html?_r=0', '>>{Vijnan} : When I read the name of this article I thought bout robots like in transformers or smth like them only made with gel like t1000. What I saw when I opened external link? Fckin stick made with gel! Ffs', ">>{stupidgate} : He's not going to give us the goods for free...", ">>{ITGuy_higgins} : What I meant is if he's actually given the Feds or Congress a taste of what he knows to see if its worthy of an immunity deal. Its common place for folks under investigation to go in front of the Feds to give a taste of what they know without incriminating themselves if the info they have is worth dealing with. Its called the Queen for a Day treatment.", '>>{cornball} : Eh, I wouldn\'t worry. The MIT marketing department tends to aggressively oversell anything that looks cool. It\'s not like a single person came up with this overnight. These labs have dozens of people spending years to come up with small improvements to existing ideas. In this case, it looks like the hand is based on the "pneu-net" actuator that came out a few years ago. This invisible fish-catching thing is just an old design built from a new material (hydrogel).', '>>{People_Have_Names} : The team fully admits it hasn’t quite figured out a real world use for the odd fish-grabbing ‘bot Ummm, how about marketing a version of it to fishermen?', ">>{ShittyStartTo2017} : > **when** Sally Yates testifies before the House Intelligence Committee Yeah ... when's that going to be? Nunes has more or less terminated any and all future action by the House intelligence community, has he not?", '>>{_personofdisinterest} : Yeah okay. Please define "not boring" so the whole class can enjoy.', ">>{ClassicToxin} : Look at a definition of robot matey Robot noun 1. a machine that resembles a human and does mechanical, routine tasks on command. 2. a person who acts and responds in a mechanical, routine manner, usually subject to another's will; automaton.", ">>{Tophurian} : I'm in the Inland Empire of California. One year, I think 2003, there were about 4 huge fires going on in different parts of the area at once. (Later determined to be arson) When some of those fires were headed towards a suburban track on a hill the insurance companies mailed out refunds for that years charges along with a note explaining that those homes were no longer insured. Insurance companies are not in the business of holding to they're agreement. They're in the business of making agreements they'll never have to hold to. Edit: formatting", ">>{The3rdWorld} : and by 2025 we'll have used up all the names that describe things as robots just in time for actual robotics to start needing lots of names... but by then we'll be calling robots 'motionless matter transport beams' and people like you and i will be saying it's just a fucking robot ffs, it's not even a beam it's just a bit of metal with motors and oh for fuck sake.", ">>{The3rdWorld} : sometimes you're just working on a little sex-toy side project and you get a bit carried away and before you know it you're standing in front of a thousand people talking about your super-gentle device for grasping and manipulating slippery cylinders about the size of a penis and repeatedly saying the words 'it's uh, for catching fish'.", '>>{machambo7} : I could see this having great applications in the field of pet-store workers catching purchached fish.', '>>{GoodAndBluts} : Is this a robot (autonomously able to capture fish) or more like a "robot hand" toy where someone has to actually operate it? It wasnt clear from the article', ">>{AeolDrias} : While those metal claws can't even catch that stuffed toy.", '>>{Devan94} : Showing the ability to understand the feelings of another Yeah I have no idea', ">>{Im_int} : I bet Trump will love this! He'll finally be able to grab them by the goldfish with his implant!", '>>{farkhipov} : I dont know.... maybe you only had the first sentence by itself', ">>{cartechguy} : This is cool. It makes me wonder if this was somewhat inspired by the anatomy of spiders. the actuation of a spider's leg is actually from blood pumping into the legs. That's why their legs shrivel up when they die.", '>>{ElasticFrog} : There is nothing wrong with exploring technologies without a specific purpose. The gel-based claw may not be super useful right now but the technologies behind it might prove useful in the future. Science is about experimenting.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{PusherofCarts} : Don't need ya Mikey, we got you by the balls!", '>>{Spectre211286} : They could still subpoena him Although the entire hearing would be 2 or 3 hours of I plead the 5th', '>>{dagrave} : No need if they have what they have already. Besides he is a traitor and does not deserve any clemency.', '>>{MuresMalum} : This time, can we *not* shove this awkwardly into the megathread?', ">>{Mad_at_reddit} : Either they don't need his testimony because they already know what he does. Or the information he has isn't the smoking gun on Trump they were looking for. Hopefully it's the former.", ">>{RestInPvPieces} : Its very likely that they have enough on him already and are moving on to bigger fish and don't want him and others to know where they are heading.", ">>{i-am-sancho} : He probably has nothing to offer. They'd only grant it to him if he has information they cannot get from other sources. They don't need him. And also, he might be the highest person whom they can actually pin any specific crimes on.", ">>{Mad_at_reddit} : 5th only protects you from providing evidence on yourself. Doesn't stop them from using their evidence on him though.", '>>{soicanshittalk} : Schiff tweet: "The public should learn a lot more about WHY General Flynn wants immunity when Sally Yates testifies before the House Intelligence Committee" Sounds like they don\'t need Flynn', '>>{EllaShue} : Also, if you read the article, they haven\'t ruled it out in the future, only that at this point it was "wildly preliminary."', '>>{Slumdog_Million} : They probably want the big fish (Trump) and Flynn isnt going to give him up that easily on account of being poisoned, shot or thrown out of a building by the Putin regime.', '>>{d_mcc_x} : Worth noting that his lawyer is a Never-Trumper???', ">>{2650_CPU} : They probably all will reject him, it means that they can (or have) already gained enough information, and what Flynn can add is simply not worth it. Even if he is subpoenaed and pleads the fifth he's screwed and so are the rest of comrades.", '>>{SchwarzerKaffee} : Thus he would have to answer what Pence knew and when he knew it.', ">>{verbose_gent} : It's not actually about helping the FBI or intelligence. It's about helping his sentencing later by establishing the appearance that he was helping as much as he could. His lawyers have been trying to make him look better for a while now. They also retroactively filed as a foreign agent for him and I'm sure many other things we haven't heard about.", '>>{shoes_stamps} : flynn and son going to guantanamo bay soon! if they were smart they would pack up and disappear to russia before their trials start', ">>{scofieldslays} : in which case the committee already knows what he would say and wouldn't need his testimony.", ">>{Erra0} : Those aren't the only two options though. The investigation in the senate is just starting. The other option is that its too pre-mature to say one way or the other. Its more the two choices you lay out if we're talking about the FBI, though.", '>>{puppers_or_die} : |A senior congressional official with direct knowledge said Flynn\'s lawyer was told it was "wildly preliminary" and that immunity was "not on the table" at the moment.| Sorry for my ignorance but this seems to be an important part of the article and it is confusing to me. Can someone explain if this has any significance?', ">>{Swimtothemoooon} : How about you testify, and we DON'T grant you immunity?", ">>{Huckleberry_Win} : Important note: The sources that talked to MSNBC said that it's too early in the investigation to be thinking about immunity deals. This doesn't mean that they won't rethink it in a few weeks when they get further into the investigation.", '>>{archronin} : If only Jack Bauer was around, Flynn will get that immunity. Guaranteed.', '>>{fjell_strom} : It ought come as no surprise that I just watched Newt Gingrich call Schiff a partisan hack - citing neither evidence nor anecdote - on Fox News', '>>{TheGrandNagusRom} : The first casualty of the Trump Train. No brakes till the bottom of the canyon.', ">>{Samuel_L_Jewson} : There's a couple things to consider here. 1) The committees in Congress aren't pursuing criminal investigations like the FBI is, so I would think they would defer to the FBI on decisions regarding potential immunity. 2) They aren't going to want to provide immunity if it isn't needed. I think in Watergate they gave immunity to some people and later ended up regretting it because it wasn't necessary and prevented them from from getting justice.", '>>{stupidgate} : Oh, this is an exciting turn of events.', '>>{orlanderlv} : Looks like they aren\'t falling for the old "Let me fall on my sword for you, Donnie" routine.', ">>{SNIIIFFFF} : I fucking love Schiff. He's been incredible lately.", '>>{republicancer} : Is Yates scheduled to testify before the House Intelligence Committee?', '>>{c_double_u} : Does the Yates hearing have a date set yet?', ">>{EllaShue} : Can you imagine the steely resolve it takes to deal with Nunes sandbagging everything you do when you *know* what needs to be done? I don't know how Schiff can talk at all; I would have long since lost my voice from screaming in incoherent rage each morning when I saw his latest efforts to trash the House committee's investigations.", '>>{roleparadise} : Schiff might just be remembered in the history books as the one who brought down Trump. (And possibly 47th president of the United States.)', '>>{aledlewis} : Still not clear what he has done or knows but hopefully the best he can hope for is a plea-bargain in exchange for testimony.', '>>{Soros_Bucks_or_Bust} : They don\'t want another Ollie North where he takes the blame and walks away clean without taking down Reagan with him....Reagan should honestly have been impeached for Iran-Contra, but "i do not recall" worked wonders for him', '>>{Scrubbing_Bubbles_} : In fairness to Gingrich, a lot of people FEEL that way. /s', '>>{ricodued} : ♫ *Real American herrroeeeesss* ♫ Today we salute you, Mr. House Intelligence Committee Not-Gonna-Take-Your-Bullshit Guy', ">>{stupidgate} : That's a bad spot for old Flynny, now all his co-conspirators know he's willing to sing.", ">>{ophelia_jones} : Flynn's statement was a disappointment. It looked like it was going to be damage mitigation, rather than collaboration with investigations. Weird thing about the dudes around Trump is that they all seem to want to die on their swords defending him, but when things don't make sense and you push back against the narrative, the stories don't hold up. (I'm looking at you, Nunes.)", '>>{ItsJustAJokeLol} : Ahaha and Trump is still tying himself to Flynn on twitter. The only people stupider than this administration are the braindead jackasses who voted for them.', ">>{Kglee54} : Once Trump's downfall is complete, we will be forced to heal as a nation. The huge irony in all of this, is that healing process can truly Make America Great Again. #MAGA2.0", ">>{Commie_Stomp} : Sounds like they know they don't have shit but need to continue the bullshit narrative.", '>>{billthomson} : Perhaps the reason he wants this is the knowledge that they have recordings of his conversations?', ">>{justinlancaster} : I'm very impressed with how composed he remains despite all the Nunes fuckery.", ">>{koproller} : That's the thing with treason. Once you're in, you're all in.", '>>{seizurevictim} : I cannot wait for the day Newt Gingrich shits his pants during a heart attack and finally leaves this earth.', ">>{bejammin075} : I think immunity can be structured such that, if you don't do exactly what we want, you go to jail. I think they should find a way to have him testify, as long as it is agreed ahead of time what he will testify. Would make some great political porn.", '>>{kuslap} : The investigation is only just beginning, so what Flynn knows can possibly still be uncovered without having to grant immunity.', '>>{the_rabble_alliance} : > Sounds like they don\'t need Flynn Sounds like a lot of people do not need nor want Flynn. For example, the mods in /r/conspiracy flaired an article about Flynn\'s request for immunity as "ZERO INDICATION." http://i.imgur.com/ki2HGfe.jpg How a subreddit dedicated to conspiracies is missing out on the political conspiracy of the decade is baffling. Subsequently, the mods tried to justify the flair with by [a sticky stating that a House spokesperson denied Flynn was seeking immunity.](https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/62hjez/flynn_offers_to_testify_on_russia_ties_in/) I pointed out that Flynn appeared to to be negotiating with the Senate, if not the House (probably due to wariness about Nunes): > [A congressional aide confirmed that discussions with the Senate intelligence committee involved immunity. The aide spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations.](http://m.startribune.com/lawyer-michael-flynn-in-talks-with-congress-about-immunity/417730303/?section=politics) I was promptly banned for pointing this out.', ">>{Holden_Coalfield} : It's a federal crime to lie to an FBI agent in the course of an investigation. That's how they get a grip on this. It's their pliers.", '>>{justinlancaster} : I wonder if they already have what they need? Perhaps they wanna make him sweat and see if other rats come out of the woodwork?', '>>{IWasRightOnce} : Him personally probably, but this also likely means that they have no reason to believe that he possesses any (additional) smoking gun that directly implicates anyone else', ">>{concussion962} : This is probably the most important takeaway - and then the Administration doesn't have an easy fall-guy. If it shows that he has exclusive information that fries bigger fish? Then they may talk about immunity. But at this point? Him *offering* to testify (for immunity) is a good start, but *has the potential* to give immunity to the only person they can *find* evidence of. They're hedging their bets, and I'm OK with that.", ">>{ITGuy_higgins} : Has anyone heard the information he supposedly has yet? I wonder if they'll let the FBI handle Flynn and the Senate will focus on what they have with continual information coming from the FBI as their investigation goes on. If I remember right, the Oliver North incident was big issue with someone trying to get immunity from both Congress and the Feds at the same time.", '>>{ITGuy_higgins} : His legal team sent a letter to them as well.', ">>{scram_jones} : He's too boring to be president. Have we learned nothing from Gore, Kerry and Hillary?", ">>{PusherofCarts} : I don't think that is right. The Senate IC investigation is just starting. You don't offer immunity before you even know what evidence you're gonna find on your own.", ">>{xjayroox} : They either want to nail him or don't think he's got something that adds to what they already know", ">>{IWasRightOnce} : >Has anyone heard the information he supposedly has yet? Well now that would entirely defeat the purpose of using it as leverage to gain immunity now wouldn't it", ">>{_Sasquat_} : YASSS! The fact that he offered to testify for immunity, at least in my mind, proves some very big shit has happened. The fact that his offer was rejected suggests they've got enough for prosecutions. HAHAHAHA!", ">>{i-am-sancho} : I have no idea what he might have, but he's been with Trump every step of the way, from campaign to white house. And I'm pretty sure the senators on the committee would talk to the FBI regarding it all. There's been times in the past where congressional investigations ran concurrently to FBI investigations, like Watergate.", '>>{duckduck_goose} : I just see Schiff quietly making a point one day and Nunes interjecting some bs in when suddenly Schiff just punches him in the face quietly saying "shut the fuck up, asshole".', ">>{JoePesciOfGoneFishin} : The other option, sadly, could be that they really don't have hard evidence on Trump (likely because the Russian were smart enough to cover their tracks, something Trump would be too stupid to do). It could be that Flynn IS the biggest target they can charge at the end of all this.", ">>{IWasRightOnce} : I don't believe my statement contradicts that notion, at least I didn't mean for it to", ">>{_personofdisinterest} : Wtf do you want, another reality TV star? Kim Kardashian? What's so boring about challenging the entire GOP? JFC.", ">>{PusherofCarts} : It does in the sense that they may have a reason to believe he has a smoking gun, but they're not prepared to say they can't find it on their own (without having to grant immunity).", ">>{ITGuy_higgins} : What I mean is if he's had his Queen for A Day meeting yet, meaning: Someone requesting immunity goes in front of the FBI, or even Congress in this case, and offers a little info about their testimony without repercussion to see if that info is worth drawing up legal immunity papers for.", '>>{kashiihama} : Is there a hearing scheduled for Yates? I know the last one was canceled', '>>{JoePesciOfGoneFishin} : I downvoted your other comment because this one was much more urgent.', ">>{scram_jones} : I'm saying he's too boring to win a general election. Boring people don't win elections.", ">>{roleparadise} : If they didn't learn after Gore or Kerry, I doubt they learned after Hillary.", ">>{FiDiy} : This also opens the doors for others with deeper and wider inside knowledge to barter deals, rather than obstruct truth. As the ripples of Flynn's culpability contaminate others, they will in turn need to further turn and implicate a wider bunch. The poor white house plumber will be fishing out a lot of bricks from toilets", '>>{toeofcamell} : Give me boring over this bullshit any day of the mother fucking week', ">>{duckduck_goose} : I actually don't agree. I think he has a lot of nuance which people mistake as boring persona", '>>{scram_jones} : Oh cool, are you the only person voting?', '>>{annoyingrelative} : Put the dots together. Adam Schiff is a lawyer and knows his words have weight. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/03/schiff-there-is-more-than-circumstantial-evidence-now/520509/ Actually, no, Chuck,” Schiff said. “I can tell you that the case is more than that. **And I can’t go into the particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now**. … I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial, and is very much worthy of investigation.” Schiff tweeted today: https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/847791113620643840 The question for you, **Mr. President, is why you waited so long to act after you learned Flynn (through your VP) had misled the country?** Are you following **the Jester on Twitter?** The Jester suggested Trump is considering how this ends, and **resignation** is one possibility. He tweeted this late last night https://twitter.com/th3j35t3r/status/847633397090365442 Remember, Trump NEVER settles. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/30/us/judge-signals-he-will-approve-trump-university-settlement.html?_r=0', ">>{stupidgate} : He's not going to give us the goods for free...", ">>{ITGuy_higgins} : What I meant is if he's actually given the Feds or Congress a taste of what he knows to see if its worthy of an immunity deal. Its common place for folks under investigation to go in front of the Feds to give a taste of what they know without incriminating themselves if the info they have is worth dealing with. Its called the Queen for a Day treatment.", ">>{ShittyStartTo2017} : > **when** Sally Yates testifies before the House Intelligence Committee Yeah ... when's that going to be? Nunes has more or less terminated any and all future action by the House intelligence community, has he not?", '>>{_personofdisinterest} : Yeah okay. Please define "not boring" so the whole class can enjoy.'], ['>>{SymbioticPatriotic} : How Millenials Watched - And Responded To - The First Debate', '>>{SymbioticPatriotic} : >"About 350 college Republicans and Democrats came together at Georgetown University in Washington, DC, to watch the first presidential debate. Graduate student...plans to vote for Green Party candidate Jill Stein, because she says both Clinton and Trump don\'t pay enough attention to climate change and the collapse of the middle class." This echoes what I\'m hearing when I go door-to-door. Everybody has a climate change concern to share, and an anecdote about how the collapsing middle class affects their household. Millennials today are looking for a choice that champions climate and economic justice, and those who\'ve done their research are picking Jill Stein to be the next President.', '>>{NarcolepticMan} : >Millennials now have roughly the same potential voting power as the boomer generation — each have 69 million registered voters. If millennials voted at the same rate as boomers — 68 percent in 2012 — they could have a huge impact on this election. Its only a matter of time until we put their mistakes behind us.', '>>{lalallaalal} : And start making our own! The circle of life.', '>>{lalallaalal} : No Bernie, Jill, or Gary to stroke it to.', ">>{SwarlsBarkley} : Because they're not old enough to remember Nader? Or because they think it won't matter? Risky move, millennials. Edit: >If he were voting in a different state, though, he says his choice might be different. “There are so many things that millennials care about that Trump does not care about, so if you’re voting third party in a swing state, you risk Trump. Never mind. I didn't fully read the article. Rock on, millennials.", ">>{KingCupboard} : But she won't be the next president, she has absolutely no shot. And you put Donald Trump that much closer to the White House, who is the antithesis of everything you say matters to you. This particular election is too important for the future (your future) to wax poetically about idealism.", '>>{SymbioticPatriotic} : One must always reach for ideals in their voting. That is what makes America the shining democracy on the hill.', ">>{datworkaccountdo} : I was not able to watch it all but what I did see was two grown people who are running to run the country bicker and dig at each other like school children. Rather appalling I must say. This is also the first debate presidential debate I have watched so I cannot say if this is the norm. My response to the debate is as we get older and replace the boomers let's not repeat the sins of are forefathers.", '>>{Master-Of-Reality} : America is not a Democracy, America is a Republic.', '>>{TuLegit2quit} : My guess, in terms of the response, is with sadness and alcohol.', ">>{TuLegit2quit} : Gore lost his home state, he was a terrible candidate. His fault not Nader's.", ">>{SwarlsBarkley} : I never said it was Nader's fault. I'm saying millennials have a short memory or don't know their history if they think there's no downside in voting for Stein.", '>>{TuLegit2quit} : There is no downside for voting for a candidate that you believe in.', ">>{SwarlsBarkley} : If only that were true, friend. I'd be right there with you.", '>>{SymbioticPatriotic} : You are very wise for a first time debate watcher (and voter?). Share your wisdom freely. Maybe even campaign for office yourself. I like the way you view things.', '>>{NorbertDupner} : Well tell me. How will a President Trump further your hopes for the country to finally address climate change? How did George W. Bush advance the agenda of the Naderites?'], ['>>{ZoneRangerMC} : MIT built a gel-based claw robot that can catch and release live fish', '>>{Seventh_______} : >The transparent fish grabber was created with funds from the Office of Naval Research, the MIT Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies and the National Science Foundation. This is the only thing in the entire article indicating why "MIT" is credited for building it. Was it MIT like the actual academic institution? No. was it some department of MIT, the academic institution? Kind of. Funded by one at least, *possibly* built there too. But then why disregard the other two funding organizations? With this in mind, I can only assume the author threw MIT into the title to namedrop a flashy school name with a crazy reputation. I have a major gripe with this...', ">>{money_loo} : Just a wild guess, but I think it's to catch and release live fish.", ">>{creepydarkwurm} : Fish can swim really fast, and it's particularly stress full on them to be chased by a net. I could see this being much easier to catch and less stress.", '>>{philmtl} : I could see this working in aquaculture, need to get the fish out some how, especially for valuable and delicate aquarium fish', '>>{nebson10} : This is not a robot. There are no sensors or control systems. This is a gel-based puppet.', ">>{Cockamamy_Cosmonaut} : Yeah, that's what I thought the last time this was posted", ">>{Badpreacher} : It's because MIT designed and built it with grants from them. http://news.mit.edu/2017/transparent-gel-robots-catch-release-fish-0201", ">>{farkhipov} : I like how they don't know what real-world applications their gel robot will/can have, but HERE IT IS", '>>{farkhipov} : humans are robots hey! you changed your comment now my reply makes no sense! ಠ_ಠ', '>>{sparr} : The list you quoted are the people who paid for it. It was actually designed and built by a group of engineers and researchers at MIT-the-actual-academic-institution.', '>>{sparr} : Various research efforts want to tag fish so their migration and such can be tracked. Catching fish in a net is dangerous to the fish.', ">>{littlebitsofspider} : THANK YOU. This stupid article is driving me nuts because it's *everywhere* and *every* title is wrong. This is a gel-based *actuator*, and it's not very useful at all.", ">>{nim_opet} : It's pretty cool. Glad there's a robot to grab my goldfish, I never liked getting my fingers wet :)", ">>{Mrjasonbucy} : Abduct me at 5pm, that's when I get off work.", ">>{i_like_tube_amps} : It's like you have no idea how modern academia work. People from universities (students, professors) will work on a project and companies who are interested in it will fund it either specifically or via a general fund pool.", ">>{i_like_tube_amps} : It's only invisible if they design an invisible pump and circuitry to drive it", ">>{92Hippie} : Abduct me at 8am, that's when I leave for work.", '>>{Mind0Matter} : I wonder how many fish got crushed to death in the making of this robot.', ">>{TheVentiLebowski} : Abduct me whenever, I'm probably on Reddit instead of working.", '>>{Montesquieuy} : Jerry the fish: No! Carl! Not again! Carl the fish: Jeeeery! *repeat 100 times*', ">>{CrimsonMoose} : Why don't you guys get abducted while at work so you don't waste your not-at-work hours?", '>>{Yodiddlyyo} : It would appear this comment is identical to the top comment from when this article was posted a few days ago.', '>>{dhamon} : But does it only let you catch a fish after every 10 tries?', '>>{Kmon87} : You know when they have a fishing show on TV? They catch the fish and then let it go. They don\'t want to eat the fish, but they do want to make it late for something. "Where were you?" "I got caught!" "I don\'t believe you, let me see the inside of your lip." - Mitch Hedberg', '>>{Kitundu} : Another leap is made toward the gelatinous sex bot we all dream of.', ">>{hudson7557} : I get that it's cool and science and shit, but why? Of all the things you could develop or use this for we went after fish?", '>>{_Ninja_Wizard_} : Ahh, shit. The constraints were a bit much still. Got any sunfish left? ...."*Gaaaaaryyyyy is your turn to clean the tank*" Gary: Damnit, already?', '>>{PantsOnDaCeiling} : I thought they meant that they found a way to have a claw machine game that you can win fish from without harming the fish', '>>{rentaspoon} : What a waste of money, I can do this with a lemonade bottle', '>>{OutOfStamina} : From the video >Becuase the robots are both powered and made almost entirely out of water, the researchers propose that hydrogel robots, if designed for underwater applications, may be entirely invisible. The video previously states that they use water-filled syringes as hydraulics to open/close the grabber hand. This is what they mean by "powered" by water (which is a strange way to use the phrase "powered by"). Something has to move the syringe, and that something isn\'t going to be transparent, and that part *won\'t* be powered by water. But I can see how having the hand that grabs be transparent is a huge deal.', '>>{Jon_Ham_Cock} : Team from MIT struggles to find pg friendly headline for new sex toy material.', '>>{SirCatMaster} : Well and the taste of peanut butter. Sweet delicious peanut butter.', ">>{John_Tickle} : 'It's like, I don't want to eat the fish, but I do want to make it late for something' MH", ">>{Seventh_______} : Woah man let's not get hostile. I was critiquing the writing of the article. Even if you think it should be common knowledge, it's best to be explicit in journalism- besides, there are cases where that's not what happened", '>>{AquaTriHungerForce} : This joke is so awesome and empathetic...love you Mitch.', '>>{farkhipov} : oh yeah! I completely forgot about taste and smell. I guess theres a *little* more to life than just pain. makes it a lot easier to understand why there are so many obese people', '>>{Insightfulcomment66} : You know they crushed some fish getting this right...', ">>{Badpreacher} : I think the author of OP's article just read this one, since it came out 1 day before it.", '>>{timalexander} : It\'s technical name aside, its hard to call this "not useful". I imagine that if you study any type of aquatic animals that you want to catch without damaging, this looks like a game changing tool.', '>>{KantArgueWithThat} : Forget about aquarium, gently but firmly grabbing stuff is something most robots so far suck at. We can use them for handling a lot more stuff than just fish.', ">>{Jaeger716} : No puppet!! You're the puppet... You're the puppet!", '>>{vmcreative} : *robot penile implants. Are we ready for wetware based sex robots???', ">>{s-dubya} : Fast and forceful MIT-built gel-clawed robots! Fast and forceful MIT-built gel-clawed robots! Fast and forceful MIT-built gel-clawed robots! Hi, I'm S. Dubya, President and C.E.O. of Fast and Forceful MIT-built Gel-clawed Robots Emporium and Warehouse! Due to a hilarious misunderstanding with a local supervillian I am overstocked on Fast and forceful MIT-built gel-clawed robots, and I am passing the saving on to you!", ">>{littlebitsofspider} : I was probably a bit hasty in judging it... I'm sure there are use cases where this thing is mind-blowing. Just the friggin' terminology got to me...", '>>{drumming_is_for_men} : Look how gentle it is with this fragile exotic fish... imagine how great it will be drilling your vagina as fast as you can make it?', '>>{LeftHookGary} : Also gold fish are super slow and clumsy and easy to catch this seems very unimpressive.', ">>{Hypersapien} : What's hilarious is that my girlfriend found this exact same story on MetaFilter the same instant that I saw it here.", '>>{lorrika62} : They could modify it to catch invasive species fish so we can get them out of the wild so they are not competing with native fish.', '>>{overthrowthecactus} : I feel like the most important part of this is the little part at the end, where it explains that this is essentially an invisible underwater engine.', '>>{vapereasons} : 1 step closer to Covenant tech. I readily await my needler gun and plasma shields', '>>{nubuttah} : they had to make up a reason for developing a device to enhance their deficiency in picking up dates at the bar.', '>>{Mrjasonbucy} : Haha this is a better version of my comment.', '>>{Fairchild22} : Virtually invisible robots under water. This might revolutionize naval warfare.', '>>{mildcal7} : Wow, I can finally get rid of that net that I currently use to grab fish.', ">>{thepasttenseofdraw} : So, you mean, hydraulics? I'm not sure what's so cool about this.", '>>{47356835683568} : No, the researchers can change the settings if they want to make more profit. Most leave it at 1:20 unless someone gets cheeky and starts tossing in sturgeon or yellowtail.', '>>{dreamsquishy} : They should sell a service where for like a buck u can catch to fish and let ur kid pet it or some shit you will make some cash off that.', '>>{Cory2020} : How much is the claw and where can I get it? Can I use it to scare lobsters?', '>>{eternal_septuagint} : I wish we would quit teaching [robots how to eat](https://www.wired.com/2009/07/military-researchers-develop-corpse-eating-robots/)', '>>{Byzantine279} : This was mostly just a proof of concept of the material used anyway.', '>>{cheese-sandwich99} : When I got accepted into MIT last month I was surprised, but also knew I had to be well above average to get in. But when I keep seeing some of their innovations featured on Reddit, I\'m just thinking, "damn some of these people make me feel like a doorknob"', ">>{nattack} : We are fast becoming the aliens of Science fictions past, It's grand.", '>>{stumpdawg} : The Claw decides who will stay, and who will go!', '>>{LawlessCoffeh} : I mean the fish was kinda like "OH GOD WHAT THE FUCK WHAT IS HAPPENING TO ME" and then chill when released...', '>>{quantic56d} : Fucking robots man. Not even the fish are safe.', '>>{Tophurian} : Workers comp is provided through an insurance company. Unless there is an alien abduction clause they are probably going to deny you until the court forces them to honor it.', '>>{Da_buddies} : Yea but can you teach fish to build a robot to catch MIT students? Now that would be impressive.', '>>{Bergeron83} : You had to go and say that, and now we have to reason this out. Thanks. :-| I\'m thinking you could get an alien abduction from your workplace classified under an "act of God"? Or maybe the court would rule that the insurance company doesn\'t have to cover it because there\'s no way they could have calculated the risk of that event.', '>>{HamburgerSam} : Nobody is going to mention the typo? "... several minutes our hours"', '>>{ThePharros} : I thought the osmosis powered robot in the video was already pretty slow, then realized that was shown at 8000x speed.', ">>{HawkfireFilms} : I'm excited to see more advanced engineering done with hydro-gel and similar substances. Maybe interactions with non-water fluids and electrical charge. ^(The fact that MIT misspelled 'millinewton' and 'or' at 0:50 was really distracting though)", '>>{MinefieldTapdancer} : looks like someone figured out a way to give a goldfish a hug.', '>>{TransMeow} : But can it...you know. Help me out?', ">>{JizzBombMcGee} : Also fancy goldfish aren't the most agile strong beasts... Pretty easy to catch with anything.", ">>{itonlygetsworse} : STEP RIGHT UP STEP RIGHT UP. ALL YOU GOOGLY EYED FISH GATHER ROUND NOW. TAKE A LOOK AT THIS NEW STATE OF THE ART FANCY WATER ROLLERCOASTER RIDE. JUST STEP RIGHT IN THIS CLUTCHY THING AND BOOM, YOU'LL BE GOING UP AND DOWN AND LEFT AND RIGHT WITHOUT MOVING A FIN! Just $10 a ride.", ">>{GhostFour} : I can't wait for one of these machines to show up at my local Dennys.", '>>{delticdiesel} : How much did this cost? We have perfectly good fishing rods for this', '>>{Dial-1-For-Spanglish} : I wonder if such robots could be used to hunt/catch/kill lionfish in the Caribbean.', '>>{nomnomnomnomRABIES} : We could have these on a conveyor belt for fishing without by catcn', '>>{Vijnan} : When I read the name of this article I thought bout robots like in transformers or smth like them only made with gel like t1000. What I saw when I opened external link? Fckin stick made with gel! Ffs', '>>{cornball} : Eh, I wouldn\'t worry. The MIT marketing department tends to aggressively oversell anything that looks cool. It\'s not like a single person came up with this overnight. These labs have dozens of people spending years to come up with small improvements to existing ideas. In this case, it looks like the hand is based on the "pneu-net" actuator that came out a few years ago. This invisible fish-catching thing is just an old design built from a new material (hydrogel).', '>>{People_Have_Names} : The team fully admits it hasn’t quite figured out a real world use for the odd fish-grabbing ‘bot Ummm, how about marketing a version of it to fishermen?', ">>{ClassicToxin} : Look at a definition of robot matey Robot noun 1. a machine that resembles a human and does mechanical, routine tasks on command. 2. a person who acts and responds in a mechanical, routine manner, usually subject to another's will; automaton.", ">>{Tophurian} : I'm in the Inland Empire of California. One year, I think 2003, there were about 4 huge fires going on in different parts of the area at once. (Later determined to be arson) When some of those fires were headed towards a suburban track on a hill the insurance companies mailed out refunds for that years charges along with a note explaining that those homes were no longer insured. Insurance companies are not in the business of holding to they're agreement. They're in the business of making agreements they'll never have to hold to. Edit: formatting", ">>{The3rdWorld} : and by 2025 we'll have used up all the names that describe things as robots just in time for actual robotics to start needing lots of names... but by then we'll be calling robots 'motionless matter transport beams' and people like you and i will be saying it's just a fucking robot ffs, it's not even a beam it's just a bit of metal with motors and oh for fuck sake.", ">>{The3rdWorld} : sometimes you're just working on a little sex-toy side project and you get a bit carried away and before you know it you're standing in front of a thousand people talking about your super-gentle device for grasping and manipulating slippery cylinders about the size of a penis and repeatedly saying the words 'it's uh, for catching fish'.", '>>{machambo7} : I could see this having great applications in the field of pet-store workers catching purchached fish.', '>>{GoodAndBluts} : Is this a robot (autonomously able to capture fish) or more like a "robot hand" toy where someone has to actually operate it? It wasnt clear from the article', ">>{AeolDrias} : While those metal claws can't even catch that stuffed toy.", '>>{Devan94} : Showing the ability to understand the feelings of another Yeah I have no idea', ">>{Im_int} : I bet Trump will love this! He'll finally be able to grab them by the goldfish with his implant!", '>>{farkhipov} : I dont know.... maybe you only had the first sentence by itself', ">>{cartechguy} : This is cool. It makes me wonder if this was somewhat inspired by the anatomy of spiders. the actuation of a spider's leg is actually from blood pumping into the legs. That's why their legs shrivel up when they die.", '>>{ElasticFrog} : There is nothing wrong with exploring technologies without a specific purpose. The gel-based claw may not be super useful right now but the technologies behind it might prove useful in the future. Science is about experimenting.'], ['>>{phonetechguru4} : The symptoms you are describing match those of a failing battery. I would suggest having Apple replace your battery. If that option is not economical enough for you, a third party battery replacement is generally cheaper-- but no matter where it is done, there is always a chance that the battery you get is not 100% new or authentic Apple.', '>>{gabrielquilez} : Usually every 8-10 days I would turn off my phone since I understand that having it on all the time can be hurtful.', '>>{gabrielquilez} : Do you know how much would replacing a battery would cost me with an Apple Store? Or can you recommend a good third party battery I could buy?', '>>{mytwofingers} : Having the same issues as you right now. Also tried everything you have to fix the battery life but to no success. Planning to visit an Apple Store over the weekend and reaching some sort of solution.', '>>{Blubbll} : delete snapchat? also see BatteryLife from the appstore how much mAh youve got left... using these social apps plus charging it the wrong way destroys the battery way faster than usual...', '>>{PM_ME_DICK_PICTURES} : Probably $200 out of warranty. I used eTradeSupply and got my 5S battery for $10 but shipping killed me :/. You can buy a screw kit for around $5 on Amazon or eBay. You could probably find better prices, look around on /r/mobilerepair', '>>{lilzoe5} : Get Battery Life & if your capacity is below 80% then you need to get it replaced. https://itunes.apple.com/app/id1080930585', '>>{Mintergirl42} : What do you mean by charging it the wrong way?', '>>{Blubbll} : like every 5 minutes, wrong charger, use it heavily by charging, directly charge it after it went off in winter and so on.', '>>{iscovisco} : No way 200 ..even screens are less expensive . In India where price is inflated a lot it was around Rs 7000 -8000 .'], ['>>{elpadrin0} : Apple Releases iOS 10.2.1 With Bug Fixes, Performance Improvements', '>>{DeathVoxxxx} : Still not showing up on my phone. EDIT (1 hour later): It does now.', ">>{PavelDatsyuk} : So since it's been years since my last iPhone(I had the 4) what's the general consensus about iOS updates? Do I try to update ASAP or do I wait to see if other people have problems?", ">>{retnuh730} : It's prob safe to wait at least a few hours in case a nasty bug decides to surface.", ">>{Razbyte} : Just wait for the rollout. For me in GMT -5 is now available. But I recommend you don't update it: remember what happened with iPhone 6s users, when the battery was draining fast after the last update?", ">>{-ThuggedOutCubScout-} : I'm at work. Can someone post a screenshot of the OTA changelog screen?", ">>{Lord_Von_Fappington} : [It doesn't say much.](http://i.imgur.com/GZkguDp.jpg)", '>>{iPerilous} : should I install now or is it best to wait and see if any bugs show up?', ">>{Vgutierrez96} : I'm on beta 3 now getting the best battery life I have ever got. Should I update or not? Also do the betas expire?", '>>{lubbocksfall} : Looks like the update is bigger than Beta 4. Factory reset and go with Public Release.', ">>{ItsDarts} : It's been my experience that others always have problems. If you've had little to no problems in the past, upgrade. If you've had problems with many updates, be sure to have a pc or Mac around and use iTunes to update. My wife for some reason, typically has problems, so we dig out the never used laptop. For me, I usually update within the first day or two and do it ota.", ">>{ReliableSource} : The betas expire, yes. You'll have to update eventually.", '>>{Dr_Drank} : I havent updated in weeks because the last update was causing phones to die randomly at like 50% for people i knew. Someone update me if this still happens', ">>{Awsaim} : They *still* haven't fixed the glitch that puts a space before sharing a song via Apple Music's action menu, resulting in one blank message bubble and then the hot link to the song...", '>>{qwop22} : Apple, its about the little details...oh wait.', '>>{N0RDLE} : Where\'s this "dark mode" the YouTube celeb wannabes kept sayin was with this update then? Just talkin out their arses again?', ">>{abasu007} : I've got. 6 plus 64gb too. I would wait a day or two. When I updated to 10.2.1 my battery drained at a ridiculous rate. Wish I had waited a couple of day to see other people's reports...", ">>{SSJ_JARVIS} : Did they fix how I can't watch videos on my correctly? Either the time stamp bar stays the whole time or I can't get rid of it...", '>>{ignaciobarrena} : Battery life should be a bit worse after updating right? I mean, the iPhone does some indexing and background processes for a few hours right ?', ">>{InvaderDJ} : Waiting to update is always a good idea if stability is your first priority, but as someone who came back to iPhone after a long period like you (last iPhone was a 3G, now have 7 Plus) I haven't experienced any major issues with an update yet and I've gotten every iOS 10 update the day it launches. The novelty of that after being on Android since 2009 is still a thing for me.", '>>{wickedytg36} : Threatre Mode is suppose to come out on ios 10.3 lol, If you\'re on Jailbreak already a tweaks out for "Dark Mode" tho', '>>{MrVais} : After updating the phone feels much faster and smoother 👌🏼', ">>{rjhakes} : I was having connectivity issues with certain apps not loading properly. After update everything works like it should and is snappier. So for me it's a 👍🏻", '>>{OkToBeTakei} : No. That\'s after a major release update, usually, or, sometimes, after a "point release" update (like 10.1 to 10.2). This seems to mostly be a maintenance update with some security and bug patches. It very probably won\'t do any reindexing like what you\'re thinking of.', ">>{SSJ_JARVIS} : No, I hadn't updated until two days ago. I had hoped it was fixed with the update but t wasn't. Am I the o my One having this issue?", ">>{DaShata} : About the same as 10.2 for me I think... The update did fix like 15 vulnerabilities(CVE's) in iOS though which is always good", '>>{Dskotak} : Did it fix Bluetooth connectivity issues?!?!?', ">>{Dark_Fiber} : Sometimes for upgrading I'll read this sub Reddit to see what experiences people are having with the update just to be sure there aren't any show-stopping issues. In any case, it's always a good idea to run a full back up in iTunes before upgrading. Then, if there's a problem, you can just restore back to what you had before.", ">>{sunyeons} : copying this from r/apple but hopefully any iPhone 5s users here can help out. 10.2 bricked my 5S and I still regret updating to it. I had to go get it to a repair shop so they can restore my phone. Does it have any necessary fixed for the 5S users? To debate if I should really update it. I haven't had battery problems and such like the others. But I still run an older pc that isn't compatible with my iPhone so I can't attempt to update it via a computer.", '>>{FlyBlahTim} : Feels like that for me too. Updating placebo?', '>>{Renovatius} : Battery life for the last 24 minutes is also astounding!', ">>{roflmyboxes} : Yeah, amazing, haven't even had to charge it.", ">>{Awsaim} : Yeah, I even called them about it too and they told me they'd open a ticket. Turns out it's not very high on their priorities", '>>{Dark_Fiber} : It looks like it fixes some big security holes. https://www.wired.com/2017/01/new-ios-update-fixes-big-security-holes-get-now/', ">>{dragontology} : How often do you reboot your iPhone? Rebooting any computer gives yet a slight temporary performance kick. It's not exactly placebo, it's just working with a fresh cache. Old data no longer present etc. Take all this with a grain of salt as I'm still learning iPhone. I'm just talking about computers in general, which smartphones basically are.", ">>{dragontology} : Glad I'm not the only one with this. Since iOS 10, Bluetooth takes 3x longer to turn on. I was advised to just leave it on all the time and it wouldn't impact my battery much when nothing is connected, and die enough it hasn't, so I have not turned it off. Might not be the danger problem though.", '>>{FlyBlahTim} : Maybe once a week. Not often but not rare', ">>{PM_ME_UR_DECOLLETAGE} : Indeed. Apple hasn't been receptive to all the beta feedback regarding this problem it seems.", ">>{40inmyfordfiesta} : You know I always see people saying stuff like this. But I have literally never had an issue with updates on my iPhone (knock on wood), and I'm sure I've done 50+ over the years."]]

classify and reply

['>>{AnastasiaBeaverhosen} : part of that is almost guarenteed to be from him. We wont get the breakdown until it gets filed with the FEC', '>>{AnastasiaBeaverhosen} : For comparison, Hillary raised about [143 million](http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-august-fundraising-donations-227649)', ">>{TrueDru1} : Donald Trump's budget plan would add $10 trillion in debt", '>>{CTR_Disinfo_Agent} : Crooked Donald is owned by special interests. Sad!', ">>{ShittingDonnieOut} : But, damn it, don't I remember Donnie saying he was going to pay for it? Jeez. It's almost as if he lied.", ">>{i_smell_my_poop} : Let's say you want to buy a widget. The price for the widget is $100 You have $10,000 so you can buy the widget. People come up to you and ask if they can buy the widget for you. That way you don't need to spend your own money. Would it be a wise decision to still use your own money to buy the widget? I'm not a Trump fan, but no one ever expected him to finance his own campaign. To attack him on raising money is stupid when there are sooooooo many other things to attack him on.", ">>{oscarboom} : [Trump's economic plans would kill nearly 7 million jobs and send the S&P 500 index about 12% lower than it is today.](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-economic-plan-cause-recession-000000449.html)", ">>{NateGrey} : Even Republican leaning economic experts can't put enough lipstick on the pig Trump calls a budget plan.", '>>{ShittingDonnieOut} : > no one ever expected him to finance his own campaign Did you just make that up?', ">>{Clay_Statue} : I disagree with how this boat is being navigated so I'm going to go down and chop a hole into the hull.", '>>{VacationAwayFromWork} : Thanks for taking an interest in our politics. Feel free to check electoral map, demographic approval ratings, and recent voting trends to see that Clinton is heavily favored to win.', ">>{AnastasiaBeaverhosen} : About 2% of the money raised for trump is done through PACs and super PACs, generally how special interests donate money. For comparison's sake, about 24% of the money raised for Hillary is done through PACs and super PACs", '>>{AnastasiaBeaverhosen} : Sorry, i thought you were legitimately asking instead of just trying to attack him :) He is self financing part of it, just not all of it. The percentage that he is self financing will be released at the next FEC filing', '>>{wraithtek} : And wake up the next day, "Oh, I didn\'t really *want* him to be president. It was a protest vote. Wait, we\'re stuck with him now? Oh god."', ">>{renonemontanez} : Doesn't appear that's the feel in the country right now via the polls", ">>{ShittingDonnieOut} : Please don't be snide, it doesn't look well on you. So, again, why isn't Donnie financing his own campaign? If you don't know the answer, that's fine. Nobody else seems to either.", '>>{Clay_Statue} : Emotional decisions are usually the opposite of rational and pragmatic ones. People do what *feels* right then are shocked when it turns out badly.', ">>{deathuntoourenemies} : Where are you getting that from? The polls where close up to the day of the voting, with leave actually slightly ahead. Some media outlets totally underestimated the chance of it because of historical trends but it wasn't as unlikely as Trump appears. His winning would both buck historical trends and overcome a massive lead by his opponent in the polls.", ">>{AnastasiaBeaverhosen} : > So, again, why isn't Donnie financing his own campaign? All i can tell you is that he is self financing some of it, and by his words its a pretty significant chunk, but we wont know the percentage until the next FEC filing", ">>{Thongpirate} : > I have no dog in this fight. So he says...then actually makes his pitch. He's a plant.", '>>{NateGrey} : Always interesting to see a foreigner interested in American politics and act so knowledgeable. What third world country are you posting from?', '>>{ShittingDonnieOut} : So, why isn\'t he financing his own campaign? Was he lying when he said this, "By self-funding my campaign, I am not controlled by my donors, special interests or lobbyists. I am only working for the people of the U.S.!"', ">>{thedoodnz} : I've bookmarked this thread, will contact everyone here day after the election.", ">>{NateGrey} : Well of course you will be proved right being a submitter of /r/SandersForPresident and spending so much time on r/politics you are practically a certified expert on American Politics! Edit: > The lymph-nodes in her neck are a dead giveaway, very swollen. I'd say early stage cancer. And apparently a doctor who specializes in online diagnosis of cancer. LOL", '>>{AnastasiaBeaverhosen} : All i can tell you is that he is self funding some of it, and by his words its a pretty significant chunk, but we wont know the percentage until the next FEC filing Whats more, only 2% of trumps fundraising comes from PACs and Super PACs, whereas 28% of Hillaries does. Given that PACs and Super PACs are generally how special interests funnel money into an election, it does seem that Trump is not getting the kind of attention from special interests groups as hillary is. https://www.google.com/search?q=clinton+fundraising&oq=clinton+fundraising&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60.2663j0j4&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8 https://www.google.com/search?q=clinton+fundraising&oq=clinton+fundraising&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60.2663j0j4&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8#q=trump+fundraising', ">>{Thus_Spoke} : I see your submission of this article didn't fare any better than my own.", '>>{OJSamson} : Oh even the right Tax Foundation claims the 10T debt http://taxfoundation.org/article/details-and-analysis-donald-trump-s-tax-plan', '>>{Ghoulishseventhson} : 7 million ILLEGAL ALIEN JOBS Funny how you leave that part out', '>>{outlooker707} : Are you gonna line up for a min wage job picking vegetables all day?', '>>{Ghoulishseventhson} : Me, no. Will the millions of unemployed? Oh yeah Especially once that industry goes union. Illegals keep wages down. No illegals, wages go up because there is no longer an exploitable work force', '>>{outlooker707} : You forgot to mention the price of your groceries will rise considerably.', '>>{Ghoulishseventhson} : Hardly. Big ag pays farm workers considerably high than the federal minimum. http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Farm_Hand/Hourly_Rate And if raising the minimum at fast food wont bring up prices than raising the minimum for farm workers wont either', '>>{oscarboom} : > 7 million ILLEGAL ALIEN JOBS Nope. _7 million American citizens will lose their jobs_ if Trump wins.', '>>{Ghoulishseventhson} : Your own article: Tax cuts without corresponding cuts in government spending would increase the federal budget deficit, which is about $600 billion this year, by roughly $1 trillion per year. #Deporting 11 million illegal immigrants would reduce the size of the labor force and consumption spending as well. The result, says Moody’s, would be a recession that runs from 2018 to 2020. Without any changes, the forecasting firm predicts, the economy would grow by 1.9% in 2019 and 1.6% in 2020. With Trump’s changes, the economy would shrink by 1.5% in 2019, with no growth in 2020. The recession would kill nearly 7 million jobs and send the S&P 500 index about 12% lower than it is today. The "shrink" in the economy would be due to illegals no longer being here.', '>>{oscarboom} : > The "shrink" in the economy would be due to illegals no longer being here. That is not the conclusion of the study. It says that various factors, including trade restrictions with many countries and deporting 11 million immigrants, would bring about a recession. And that recession Trump causes would likely result in 7 million Americans losing their jobs.', ">>{Ghoulishseventhson} : That's exactly what it says. It just worded it so it doesn't come out and explicitly say it It doesn't say 7 million *American* jobs. It say 7 million jobs. You are the one saying American jobs despite it not saying that. You're pushing a narrative your own article is gunning down", '>>{outlooker707} : If big ag pays farm works so well then why is it all illegals working for less than mininum?', ">>{Ghoulishseventhson} : Do they? You ever talked to the illegals outside a hardware store in cali? They dont work for peanuts. Big ag hires illegals because they can fire them at any time, pay no insurance for them, dont have to pay workman's comp, dont have to pay OT, dont have to maintain a safe work environment or follow any OSHA standards, and the illegals wont say shit because they can get deported or simply not paid.", ">>{oscarboom} : > It just worded it so it doesn't come out and explicitly say it In other words, it doesn't say any such thing. It is completely nonsensical that e.g. Trump putting tariffs on China would affect the jobs of only illegal immigrants here who don't have anything to do with China.", '>>{Ghoulishseventhson} : Try to stay on topic. This is about a report that says removing illegals will shrink the economy', ">>{oscarboom} : My link is about a report that the entirety of Trump's economic policies will cause a recession which will _result in_ 7 million jobs lost. [Imposing new tariffs on imports from China and Mexico, as Trump wants to do, might lead to retaliatory tariffs on US exports to the same countries, and less trade overall...The result, says Moody’s, would be a recession...The recession would kill nearly 7 million jobs and send the S&P 500 index about 12% lower than it is today.]"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{TrueDru1} : Donald Trump's budget plan would add $10 trillion in debt", ">>{oscarboom} : [Trump's economic plans would kill nearly 7 million jobs and send the S&P 500 index about 12% lower than it is today.](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-economic-plan-cause-recession-000000449.html)", ">>{NateGrey} : Even Republican leaning economic experts can't put enough lipstick on the pig Trump calls a budget plan.", ">>{Clay_Statue} : I disagree with how this boat is being navigated so I'm going to go down and chop a hole into the hull.", '>>{VacationAwayFromWork} : Thanks for taking an interest in our politics. Feel free to check electoral map, demographic approval ratings, and recent voting trends to see that Clinton is heavily favored to win.', '>>{wraithtek} : And wake up the next day, "Oh, I didn\'t really *want* him to be president. It was a protest vote. Wait, we\'re stuck with him now? Oh god."', ">>{renonemontanez} : Doesn't appear that's the feel in the country right now via the polls", '>>{Clay_Statue} : Emotional decisions are usually the opposite of rational and pragmatic ones. People do what *feels* right then are shocked when it turns out badly.', ">>{deathuntoourenemies} : Where are you getting that from? The polls where close up to the day of the voting, with leave actually slightly ahead. Some media outlets totally underestimated the chance of it because of historical trends but it wasn't as unlikely as Trump appears. His winning would both buck historical trends and overcome a massive lead by his opponent in the polls.", ">>{Thongpirate} : > I have no dog in this fight. So he says...then actually makes his pitch. He's a plant.", '>>{NateGrey} : Always interesting to see a foreigner interested in American politics and act so knowledgeable. What third world country are you posting from?', ">>{thedoodnz} : I've bookmarked this thread, will contact everyone here day after the election.", ">>{NateGrey} : Well of course you will be proved right being a submitter of /r/SandersForPresident and spending so much time on r/politics you are practically a certified expert on American Politics! Edit: > The lymph-nodes in her neck are a dead giveaway, very swollen. I'd say early stage cancer. And apparently a doctor who specializes in online diagnosis of cancer. LOL", '>>{OJSamson} : Oh even the right Tax Foundation claims the 10T debt http://taxfoundation.org/article/details-and-analysis-donald-trump-s-tax-plan', '>>{Ghoulishseventhson} : 7 million ILLEGAL ALIEN JOBS Funny how you leave that part out', '>>{outlooker707} : Are you gonna line up for a min wage job picking vegetables all day?', '>>{Ghoulishseventhson} : Me, no. Will the millions of unemployed? Oh yeah Especially once that industry goes union. Illegals keep wages down. No illegals, wages go up because there is no longer an exploitable work force', '>>{outlooker707} : You forgot to mention the price of your groceries will rise considerably.', '>>{Ghoulishseventhson} : Hardly. Big ag pays farm workers considerably high than the federal minimum. http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Farm_Hand/Hourly_Rate And if raising the minimum at fast food wont bring up prices than raising the minimum for farm workers wont either', '>>{oscarboom} : > 7 million ILLEGAL ALIEN JOBS Nope. _7 million American citizens will lose their jobs_ if Trump wins.', '>>{Ghoulishseventhson} : Your own article: Tax cuts without corresponding cuts in government spending would increase the federal budget deficit, which is about $600 billion this year, by roughly $1 trillion per year. #Deporting 11 million illegal immigrants would reduce the size of the labor force and consumption spending as well. The result, says Moody’s, would be a recession that runs from 2018 to 2020. Without any changes, the forecasting firm predicts, the economy would grow by 1.9% in 2019 and 1.6% in 2020. With Trump’s changes, the economy would shrink by 1.5% in 2019, with no growth in 2020. The recession would kill nearly 7 million jobs and send the S&P 500 index about 12% lower than it is today. The "shrink" in the economy would be due to illegals no longer being here.', '>>{oscarboom} : > The "shrink" in the economy would be due to illegals no longer being here. That is not the conclusion of the study. It says that various factors, including trade restrictions with many countries and deporting 11 million immigrants, would bring about a recession. And that recession Trump causes would likely result in 7 million Americans losing their jobs.', ">>{Ghoulishseventhson} : That's exactly what it says. It just worded it so it doesn't come out and explicitly say it It doesn't say 7 million *American* jobs. It say 7 million jobs. You are the one saying American jobs despite it not saying that. You're pushing a narrative your own article is gunning down", '>>{outlooker707} : If big ag pays farm works so well then why is it all illegals working for less than mininum?', ">>{Ghoulishseventhson} : Do they? You ever talked to the illegals outside a hardware store in cali? They dont work for peanuts. Big ag hires illegals because they can fire them at any time, pay no insurance for them, dont have to pay workman's comp, dont have to pay OT, dont have to maintain a safe work environment or follow any OSHA standards, and the illegals wont say shit because they can get deported or simply not paid.", ">>{oscarboom} : > It just worded it so it doesn't come out and explicitly say it In other words, it doesn't say any such thing. It is completely nonsensical that e.g. Trump putting tariffs on China would affect the jobs of only illegal immigrants here who don't have anything to do with China.", '>>{Ghoulishseventhson} : Try to stay on topic. This is about a report that says removing illegals will shrink the economy', ">>{oscarboom} : My link is about a report that the entirety of Trump's economic policies will cause a recession which will _result in_ 7 million jobs lost. [Imposing new tariffs on imports from China and Mexico, as Trump wants to do, might lead to retaliatory tariffs on US exports to the same countries, and less trade overall...The result, says Moody’s, would be a recession...The recession would kill nearly 7 million jobs and send the S&P 500 index about 12% lower than it is today.]"], ['>>{AnastasiaBeaverhosen} : part of that is almost guarenteed to be from him. We wont get the breakdown until it gets filed with the FEC', '>>{AnastasiaBeaverhosen} : For comparison, Hillary raised about [143 million](http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-august-fundraising-donations-227649)', '>>{CTR_Disinfo_Agent} : Crooked Donald is owned by special interests. Sad!', ">>{ShittingDonnieOut} : But, damn it, don't I remember Donnie saying he was going to pay for it? Jeez. It's almost as if he lied.", ">>{i_smell_my_poop} : Let's say you want to buy a widget. The price for the widget is $100 You have $10,000 so you can buy the widget. People come up to you and ask if they can buy the widget for you. That way you don't need to spend your own money. Would it be a wise decision to still use your own money to buy the widget? I'm not a Trump fan, but no one ever expected him to finance his own campaign. To attack him on raising money is stupid when there are sooooooo many other things to attack him on.", '>>{ShittingDonnieOut} : > no one ever expected him to finance his own campaign Did you just make that up?', ">>{AnastasiaBeaverhosen} : About 2% of the money raised for trump is done through PACs and super PACs, generally how special interests donate money. For comparison's sake, about 24% of the money raised for Hillary is done through PACs and super PACs", '>>{AnastasiaBeaverhosen} : Sorry, i thought you were legitimately asking instead of just trying to attack him :) He is self financing part of it, just not all of it. The percentage that he is self financing will be released at the next FEC filing', ">>{ShittingDonnieOut} : Please don't be snide, it doesn't look well on you. So, again, why isn't Donnie financing his own campaign? If you don't know the answer, that's fine. Nobody else seems to either.", ">>{AnastasiaBeaverhosen} : > So, again, why isn't Donnie financing his own campaign? All i can tell you is that he is self financing some of it, and by his words its a pretty significant chunk, but we wont know the percentage until the next FEC filing", '>>{ShittingDonnieOut} : So, why isn\'t he financing his own campaign? Was he lying when he said this, "By self-funding my campaign, I am not controlled by my donors, special interests or lobbyists. I am only working for the people of the U.S.!"', '>>{AnastasiaBeaverhosen} : All i can tell you is that he is self funding some of it, and by his words its a pretty significant chunk, but we wont know the percentage until the next FEC filing Whats more, only 2% of trumps fundraising comes from PACs and Super PACs, whereas 28% of Hillaries does. Given that PACs and Super PACs are generally how special interests funnel money into an election, it does seem that Trump is not getting the kind of attention from special interests groups as hillary is. https://www.google.com/search?q=clinton+fundraising&oq=clinton+fundraising&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60.2663j0j4&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8 https://www.google.com/search?q=clinton+fundraising&oq=clinton+fundraising&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60.2663j0j4&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8#q=trump+fundraising', ">>{Thus_Spoke} : I see your submission of this article didn't fare any better than my own."]]

classify and reply

[">>{tjsherod} : I am a Best Buy Mobile employee. With the iPhone 7 launch soon, i'm answering any and all questions regarding: Pre-orders, pricing, carrier installment plans, carrier questions, and more!", '>>{KingWizard_IX} : If I have an iPhone 6s through T-Mobile jump, how do I preorder an iPhone 7', ">>{CarmineFields} : I don't think anyone is stunned that Trump is a thin skinned loudmouth at this point...", ">>{The_Write_Stuff} : No, they're stunned that conservative media is run by half-wits.", ">>{ManWithASquareHead} : I'll believe it when I see it. Hearings tomorrow and there's still time for Burr to run around playing Ruskimon", '>>{kjellpu} : Chelsea Clinton finally finds her political voice — and it’s edgy', '>>{StupidYoure} : How about answering all the ones you just mentioned?', '>>{SniffyClock} : Careful. Saying things like that will get you downvoted.', ">>{moxxon} : How about consequences for Nunes fucking up the House investigation and we get that back on track. Both probes should continue. Nunes buffoonery shouldn't be allowed to derail one of them.", ">>{tjsherod} : The answers can vary on a case by case basis due to individual plans, upgrade eligibility, bill credits for installment plans, etc. It's very hard to give complete answers without the individual persons situation.", '>>{simxc} : Stunned? More like repeatedly disappointed with the behavior of a 70 YEAR OLD MAN.', '>>{FreedomsPower} : the only thing stunning is the low info blogs the far right pushes as news', '>>{thewholedamnplanet} : Well if "politicized" you mean those being investigated are in charge of the investigation and are doing everything they can to derail it.', ">>{drdreyfus} : Nothing like fighting (what's claimed to be) bad journalism with more bad journalism.", '>>{Heaven_Knows} : I agree that the Senate investigation is our only hope at finding the truth right now as long as Nunes is heading up the House investigation. I just hope that the Senate Committee is open to having the public hearings that the House Committee was originally going to have. I also hope that it won\'t get tanked by the Republican side if there are findings in a public hearing that put some "heat" on the President and his administration.', '>>{MolestedConservative} : It\'s sad that fellow Republicans focus on entertainment news instead of our horrific opiate problem. All of the polls taken at Trump\'s rallies and now through "the email" said that 73% of us trump supporters are hooked on pills, heroin and other drugs. Let\'s talk about that and how it churches, parents and communities failed us leading to this horror show.', '>>{ivsciguy} : Guess we just have to get an independent prosecutor.....', '>>{Loxodontist} : The future president of the United States should not be this easy to provoke.', '>>{IBringYouToBurn} : OOOOhhh spicy boy, we need another james_delaney to help keep the bull shit posts flowing to the rightie tighties', '>>{sdfsdfsdffdffff} : What if Senate pulls the same stunt? All this proves is that Republicans should never be allowed to be majority party.', ">>{Heaven_Knows} : Yeah, I'm hoping that doesn't happen. If it does, we will have to hope the FBI investigation can get it done. Also, I agree the republican majority in both the senate and house is a huge problem. Hopefully, we the people can affect change in the 2018 mid terms.", '>>{Grizzly_Corey} : Ahh the age-old "I know you are but what am I?" unsolvable retort to this day. How will we ever progress as a species?', '>>{SaltHash} : >OOOH spicy girl. we needed another clinton in politics to help keep the cash flowing to the foundation baby. Right. Because only Daddy Trump can use his daughters to keep the cash flowing to their organization.', ">>{warpde} : We are not shocked that Trump hits back. It's his Modus operandi to deflect and confuse. It's how the bastard got elected in the first place.", '>>{Itsprobablysarcasm} : Remind me again when Obama dressed down right-wing media in this manner...', '>>{PlasticMagnate} : This family should just get out of the public eye for a little while. Just a little while. Please.', '>>{Itsprobablysarcasm} : Is there any proof, any evidence at all that Obama yelled and dressed down Fox News reporters? Any at all?', ">>{ohnothejuiceisloose} : Nice to see that she's getting under Conway's thin, shriveled, melting skin.", '>>{tupac_chopra} : this is one of those fake news things the alt right keeps shouting about, correct?', ">>{ChicagoJohn123} : If it's overly politicized we could replace it with a non-partisan independent prosecutor.", '>>{tryingtobenicereally} : I would be stunned if they were run by half-wits. I thought they were fifth-wits or at most quarter-wits.', '>>{knox3} : Given your username, I expected a more wicked burn.', '>>{HumanLikeYou155} : I think it was Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut who was on MSNBC last night that was saying the first session is just going to be a basic introductory meeting and that the major witnesses would be coming later.', '>>{skullgenie} : We should get Chelsea to run for president in 2020. It would be tradition to get her to lose to Trump too.', ">>{cosmolicious} : I'm on the Best Buy One Sprint plan, and have been ready for an upgrade. How would I go about preordering the new phone?", ">>{Erock2} : Bestbuy doesn't do T-Mobile so I doubt he can help that much regarding your question. But to answer it, (assuming you're on the newer version of jump) pay off 50% of the phone then go to the store and tell them you want to jump, they will ship you the 7 and you use the box to ship back the 6s.", '>>{tylerbr97} : What could I do about financing an iPhone 7 off contract? Do you have any idea on 64GB pricing?', '>>{sox_n_sandals} : he can always start another sub for "neutral post" that are sure to be upvoted', '>>{mattbull98} : How much would a 7 pro 128 GB run me a month? Thank you in advance!', '>>{Lextucky} : Establishment Republicans need to get their tax cuts, deregulation and Gorsuch through first before looking too hard into all of this. After those are accomplished, President Pence will sound better to them immediately.', '>>{Roflllobster} : I mean im a democrat and id really like Chelsea Clinton to stay out of politics. I dont like politics being a family business.', ">>{tjsherod} : Head to your nearest best buy. To preorder it at the store, you'll put down a $50 deposit but basically you're buying a $50 best buy gift card and you'll use that toward any upfront cost when you receive the phone. It's just our way of making reservations, so it'll cost you $50 for the $50 best buy gift card but you'll use it when you pick up the phone.", '>>{tjsherod} : Are you wanting to do carrier financing through a postpaid carrier like verizon, sprint, or at&t? or bringing it to a prepaid carrier?', ">>{noahcallaway-wa} : We should not simply rely on the FBI. As long as the Senate investigation continues I'm...okay. If the R's blow up the Senate investigation, it's time to buy a plane ticket to DC.", '>>{Buttocks} : [Link](http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/obama-on-his-legacy-trumps-win-and-the-path-forward-w452527) >I think that part of it has to do with our inability, our failure, to reach those voters effectively. Part of it is Fox News in every bar and restaurant in big chunks of the country *You edited your post.', '>>{tawa6261} : OMFG - how do you ever suppose Fox ever recovered from such yelling and dressing down??', ">>{IBringYouToBurn} : been banned toooo many times by the snowflakes on the right who can't handle the truth.", ">>{Ajreil} : Trump hits back You mean for holding people in power accountable? The media ***should*** be doing that. If Sanders or Clinton were the president elect I'd say the same thing.", '>>{tjsherod} : What carrier do you have? If a current carrier, what plan and data size? If new carrier, which one?', ">>{veridique} : If he isn't thrown out of office by thn.", ">>{tjsherod} : Last time we had preorders, our preorder system did require a current account so we couldn't do hardware only preorder. There's a couple ways around it. What carrier do you have, or are going to?", ">>{placeboasis} : Good for her. This is the first time in her life that neither of her parents are in or running for office. She can speak her mind now, and I hope she does. I'd say she's earned it after putting up with decades of constant attacks on her family.", ">>{tjsherod} : lol i wish i knew ahead of time. We don't find that out until the event, we've just been going off of rumors pointing to the 23rd based on AT&T leaks", ">>{SniffyClock} : Great idea. We should have a neutral political sub that's open to all. Needs to have a broad name though... How about r/politics?", '>>{Delta_V09} : The FBI investigation is really the one that matters as far as building a case and collecting evidence to use in a trial. The main purpose of the House/Senate investigations is to shift popular opinion and gather political support.', '>>{oouzy} : I have a 6s thru Verizon that I purchased 3 months after launch, I still owe 3 payments before I can upgrade. On the Verizon app it says "click here to upgrade early" and shows my balance of 3 payments (around $125) but when I click that it shows my total remaining balance on the phone ( around 499) and keeps asking me to pay that off. When I continue with the purchase it says something like "today u owe 549 and you should expect to see a credit on your account of 300 in the next few billing cycles" is it just doing this because the 7 hasn\'t been released yet and there is technically no "upgrade" available yet? Or will I need to order over the phone with a rep? I\'m just trying to do dry runs because I live on the east coast and will be waking up at 3 am to preorder then going back to sleep and want this to be as painless as possible. Thanks for any insight', ">>{Teddy2011} : This is quintessential alt right 'journalism'... High in opinion, low in fact High in emotional manipulation, low in objectivity Perfectly appeals to folks with low critical thinking ability, but who are easily emotionally incensed.", ">>{Sirenallure} : If I get iPhone 7 from Best Buy on a carrier, will I have to pay Best Buy an amount, or will the iPhone just be billed on my carrier bill, as if I ordered from Apple? I didn't know Best Buy did preorders. Do I have to pay for it online or can I pay in store (or the above question)?", '>>{Itsprobablysarcasm} : My guess is by reporting that Obama will establish death panels and FEMA camps while waging a nonstop war on Christmas and taking guns away from patriots.', '>>{Teddy2011} : Wow he really let fox have it there. How did they ever recover from something like that? That is way worse than Trump yelling down a CNN reporter in his first press conference in over 6 months.', '>>{Buttocks} : The poster asked for proof of Obama whining about Fox, they edited their post.', '>>{ImAHackDontLaugh} : The left literally turned having a global, effective, reputable charity into a liability. Who even has to worry about made up attacks from the GOP when your own side will swift boat you.', ">>{Icouldbeanyone} : I liked Conway's horrible attempt at a response. She really got her bringing up something her mother did! /s", ">>{Buttocks} : That's not what the poster asked for, they edited their post.", ">>{rounder55} : I'm not stunned he hits back. I used to be stunned by his level of hypocrisy/dimwittedness. Not knowing Putin was in Crimea while saying he'll never invade it as Russia had been there a year. Demanding apologies from people who criticize him while offending gold star parents, John McCain, everyone else not named Putin. That hes lied about releasing his taxes, calls a network fake news then files questions from a website that doesn't believe in global warming. That he claims he never said global warming was a Chinese hoax when tweeted it. He cant even hit back with facts. What is stunning is the level of dumb Trump makes us all on a daily basis", '>>{Teddy2011} : You said he whined about fox "all the time". What you posted can hardly be considered whining. Surely there are tons of better examples than that since he was doing it "all the time!" Let\'s see the good ones man! Trump continuously tweets that CNN is fake, failing, terrible, etc etc. I can easily pull those examples. How about you do the same for what you\'re claiming.', '>>{tjsherod} : preorders are done in store. Everything is billed through your carrier like normal. If you do installments through your carrier, sales tax is done in store. No sort of extra cost going through us', '>>{dagrave} : TIL: Chelsea Clinton is 36. I am getting fucking old.', '>>{superfastra} : I have ATT. I want to upgrade to the 7. I have $250 left to pay off the iPhone. How do I return the iPhone 6 when I do the upgrade?', ">>{VotesSlitThroats} : I can't imagine where someone's mind must be to think Trump is a sure win in 2020. Wait, yes I do. Insane.", ">>{verbose_gent} : Is she employing consultants or a pr firm? I don't think anyone actually gives a fuck what she thinks.", ">>{tjsherod} : If you're doing the trade in to upgrade, you get shipping materials and 14 days to send back", '>>{Buttocks} : I already offered an example, you want more?', ">>{jimmygle} : Assuming you're a troll based on the username, but if you're not, where are you getting the 73% number?", ">>{bajubiejunior} : Dumb question but if my upgrade is on the 19th, can I pre-order a new phone before that upgrade date and still pay the upgrade price? I'm doing the 2-year contract.", ">>{Magjee} : Nice to see her get under Conway's skin   But, what office will she be running for in 2018?", ">>{x5AVAG3x} : I'm with Verizon and my upgrade date is September 20th, can I still preorder before my upgrade date if the phone won't be released until after I'm eligible for an upgrade? Or do I have to be eligible prior to being able to preorder?", ">>{JPohlman} : With respect, until Chelsea comes out and admits the DNC was unfair in it's primary and demands an end to Superdelegates, I really don't care what she says. She'll be trapped in the shadow of her parents, which isn't her fault; but she'll also be trapped there by her alignment with them, which is. The same goes for Hillary, only moreso.", '>>{Itsprobablysarcasm} : My original and unedited post clearly states "dressing down" and **you** replied with Obama "whined" which means a) you don\'t understand the difference between the two, or b) you are purposely trying to draw an false equivalency. So I clarified. I want proof that Obama treated anyone in the right-wing media the way Trump is treating those he doesn\'t like. And it\'s fucking hilarious that you think Obama calling out the lies on Fox News is "whining".', '>>{Itsprobablysarcasm} : See, now you\'re just lying. I didn\'t say I wanted proof of "whining". You deliberately changed the goalposts from "dressing down" to whining and my post said "Proof?" and then I realized you\'d moved the goalposts.', '>>{CWApawn} : Whichever one she does run for, I hope she wins it just so Republicans have a massive coronary episode.', '>>{Buttocks} : If I post another example will you change your mind, or is this a waste of time?', ">>{djneill} : Maybe Bernie should come out and apologise for trying to get the superdelegates to overturn the will of the people. But no you'd never condemn real shitty tactics because you've got fictional ones to complain about.", ">>{schnazzmizzles} : That's not true. Web Hubbell has been out of the spot light for a long time.", '>>{Teddy2011} : Sure, you claimed that he whined about fox all the time. I doubt that claim and if you prove me wrong I will admit to it.', '>>{tjsherod} : Are you wanting to get the phone 50% paid off to trade in and upgrade or pay it fully off and keep the 6S and upgrade?', '>>{JPohlman} : The Superdelegates (like the Electoral College) ONLY exist to overturn the will of the people in cases where the people select someone clearly unfit, correct? I am against both, and I would argue both proved their uselessness in 2016. The Superdelegates didn\'t wait until after the primaries to speak. They came out in favor of Clinton so heavily on Day One that nobody, from Bernie to O\'Malley to Chafee, had a fair chance. (To say nothing of other help she got from the DNC, down to proposed character-assassination plays against "athiest" Sanders) When all of the evidence, from polls to potentially prosecutable pitfalls were taken into consideration, the Superdelegates had every objective reason to step in and say, "you know, Clinton won by a narrow margin but only with so much help, and Bernie polls above 10% over Trump," and overturn the will of the "people," which was at best a product of the SD\'s guidance in the first place! So I believe that, since they failed to do their job in putting forward the best candidate, or at least in staying out of the fucking primary until AFTER the vote was held, they should be abolished. Same premise with the Electoral College. They existed for ONE reason - to take the decision-making out of the hands of the people and give them to "the states." Except really this was supposed to prevent a populist madman from rising to power. (See the Federalist Papers for proof of this intent) Guess what? Clinton won an election, but Trump won the selection. Why? Because the EC is a stupid idea that reduces the will of some people in favor of others. So we should get rid of that, too.', ">>{Buttocks} : Here's a link with several examples: [Link](https://www.google.com/amp/amp.dailycaller.com/2017/01/11/the-media-is-outraged-that-trump-criticized-cnn-they-must-have-forgotten-when-obama-did-the-same-to-fox-news/?client=safari) I await your apology.", '>>{S_Bek} : We are going to have Trumps head on Mt. Rushmore.', '>>{ThcLoserGuy} : Eh, rumors of her future NY senate run were everywhere right after the election. Interesting she found her voice now.', ">>{wwwes32} : None of those are even remotely close to what Trump does, and Obama did multiple interviews with Fox. He called on them in press conferences pretty regularly. Try and follow me here.... 1== 1 1 lb != 1 ton They also weren't all said within the span of two months, but whatevs.", '>>{tjsherod} : Are you wanting to do a 2 year contract or the installments? you may be able to early upgrade if you do installments, and with some plans it can be cheaper in the long run to do the installments. I can explain all of that if you tell me what your plan is and your data size for that plan is.', '>>{juanschwartz} : Did the investigation into the CF determine she had used funds for a wedding? Or maybe that was a podesta email?', '>>{mattbull98} : I have T mobile but you can give me ATT numbers. I have unlimited Data with T mobile.', '>>{Teddy2011} : None of that is whining in the same sense that trump relentlessly attacks any news source that is critical of him. Most of those examples are Obama saying "instead of just taking fox\'s word for it, do some more research and cross reference..." None of that is childish screaming about fake news and nazi Germany.', ">>{NoeG2018} : Not sure if this is the best place to ask but I've been on a two year contract with AT&T since the 5s came out and the contract is over. What would be the best and cheapest way to get the new iPhone, I'm still with AT&T", ">>{x5AVAG3x} : I haven't decided yet everything recently is on installment my phone now was the last with just a contract. I will most likely go the installment route and then pay off the remainder of what I owe left on another device on my installment plan. I have the new Verizon plan with 16GB of data.", '>>{superfastra} : is there still a charge to upgrade? this will be my first time upgrading through att next', ">>{Teddy2011} : I would love for someone to compare and contrast Obama's measured and fair assessment of Fox's coverage of him, with how trump behaves every day.", '>>{Buttocks} : >None of that is whining in the same sense that trump relentlessly attacks any news source that is critical of him. You asked for examples of Obama whining about Fox, and I provided them. You were wrong.', ">>{tjsherod} : It's either $15 or $20 on your bill", ">>{KingWizard_IX} : I've used jump before and never had to pay off 50% of the phone", '>>{Teddy2011} : Remind me again when Obama dressed down fox in this manner.. Buttocks: "Obama whined about fox all the time." Ok.. so you\'re not saying he dressed down fox, just that he recognized that fox was critical of him and pointed it out. So we\'ll just go ahead and chalk this up as a false equivalency.', ">>{Buttocks} : Obama whining about Fox has nothing to do with Trump. You do realize it's possible to judge Obama's behavior without comparing him to Trump. Fact is Obama whined about Fox News for years, you can add all the qualifiers you want but the fact remains.", ">>{tjsherod} : Okay so AT&T has 2 plans for their installment agreements. AT&T Next and AT&T Next Every Year. Every year is a 24 month installment plan with an upgrade after the phone is 50% paid off. Standard Next is a 30 month agreement with an upgrade after the phone is 80% paid off. The 24 month agreement is better for most people. It's 41.58/mo for that. You add on $20 for line access, and then add on data cost. Data has a high speed cap and after that it slows it down. 3 GB $40 6 GB is $60 10 GB is $80 and there's more options. But the formula is the full retail cost of the phone divided by 24 or 30, plus $20 for line access, plus data. So a 6 GB plan with a 128 7 Plus is $121.58/mo.", ">>{tjsherod} : I've never ordered a phone through verizon's website, but i know the way it works in store at best buy is we pull up your number to do an upgrade and it gives us the option to pay up or pay off. Pay up is to get you to 50%, and then we give you an envelope to send the old one back within 14 days. So you'd pay however much in store to get to 50% and then you'd pay sales tax on the new phone, and send the old phone back using our shipping materials.", '>>{tjsherod} : What plan do you have and what data size is it?', '>>{Teddy2011} : The comment you responded to is literally a comparison to Trump.', ">>{tjsherod} : Sometimes sprint gives you a two year upgrade a week or two before your contract actually expires. That way when people get the notification they can upgrade and immediately go and sign another 2 year contract with sprint and sprint doesn't have to worry about people falling out of contract and switching. Best thing to do is call sprint and say you wanna preorder the new iphone but your two year contract isn't up when preorders start. See if they can give you an early upgrade. Might not work but it's something to try. Also sprint does not do 2 year contracts in store anymore, but best buy still does.", ">>{tjsherod} : You most likely should be able to do an early upgrade on installments if you're that close to the end of your 2 year contract from my experience dealing with hundreds of instances like that. If you're currently on a 2 year contract your line access should be $40/mo, on installments its $20/mo. So take the monthly installment amount and subtract 20 from it to see how much extra it will be each month. Installment activation fee is $20, 2 year contract activation fee is $40.", '>>{tjsherod} : What plan are you on and what data size?', '>>{bobbys360} : You can order through Apple 7 days early. I have done this and I am with Verizon. You can also trade your Iphone into Verizon and get a gift card to apply to your bill as well. I am still on the 2 year contract as well.', ">>{Buttocks} : Remember when you said you'd admit you were wrong if I provided more examples of Obama whining about Fox? I remember.", ">>{Teddy2011} : I'm sorry that you think what Obama was doing was whining, and that you think it's comparable to Trump.", '>>{tjsherod} : Are you on "The Verizon Plan" 1 GB?', ">>{NoeG2018} : I've been on this plan for a long time this was back when AT&T was on a two year contract. So I was on the two year contract with AT&T, and I have a 10gb data plan that is shared with my family", '>>{tjsherod} : So AT&T does their Next plan. 24 month agreement w/ annual upgrade. If your line access is currently $40, the installment does not stack on top of the $40. Your line access will drop to $15 and then the installment goes on top of your that. So if your line access is still $40, then the installments will only be a few dollars a month', ">>{oouzy} : Yea that's perfect, I just hope they let me do it like that on the website now that the phone is out", '>>{lauradiamandis} : There have actually been three different versions of JUMP. One allows you to upgrade once the phone is halfway paid off or twice a year, one is just halfway paid off, and one is up to three upgrades yearly without paying the phone halfway off. I work at t mobile and it is very confusing', '>>{edwardmassa1994} : Will Best Buy employees be able to preorder the iPhone 7? I know in the past we were unable to and had to wait for actual release day after all preorders were taken care of. Also, any word on any promos?', ">>{tjsherod} : I think it's up to your management. iPhone 7 is going to universal carrier device so it's going to be a first come first serve basis as they'll no longer be carrier specific for our inventory and we'll just get sim cards for that carrier. No word on promos.", '>>{lol_elijah} : Hey what kind of promotions should we expect when the phone launches? Does the promo apply when you preorder or when you pick up the phone?', '>>{HuskyStyle18} : I preordered an iPhone 7 and Apple Watch Series 2 and in my email it says "Item has been pre-ordered - GET IT BY: FRI 09/16" for both items. Would you say it\'s pretty likely that the two items will arrive 9/16 at my house?', '>>{tjsherod} : You should get it by sunday, most likely friday though', '>>{bchads5} : I ordered a Black Iphone 7 Plus 128 gb at about 4 am on friday and had it so i pick it up at the store. It says "Expected release date: 09/16/2016". Should i be able to pick it up by the end of the weekend? Also does Best Buy usually stock for walk ins?', '>>{tjsherod} : You should be able to pick it up by the end of the weekend, and any walk in stock will be very limited as the iphones are no longer carrier specific for inventory and we just get a sim card for that carrier.', ">>{sweetdubbro} : I pre ordered an iP7+ through bestbuy.com at 1am when orderes opened up.I'm concerned that I wont get my phone on release day (16th). It stills processing on my order status but on my att account it says I cant purchase another device with an installment plan (assuming its because I just bought one). Is there any way to find out when my phone is coming? I'd like to cancel if its not coming on the 16th and take my chances at the store on release day.", ">>{tjsherod} : You should have it the 16th. That's why some say sold out online cause we don't sell preorders that won't be guaranteed launch day", '>>{sweetdubbro} : Thanks! I hope, im leaving the state and would like to have my new phone, just a little concerning that its Wednesday and it hasnt moved past processing onto preparing for shipment.', '>>{Gbpackers22} : Just ordered a 7+ 128GB unactivated(Verizon Wireless model) and the delivery date is 10/5-10/14, is this true?', '>>{Gbpackers22} : :( the order status is still the same.. "backordered"']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{CarmineFields} : I don't think anyone is stunned that Trump is a thin skinned loudmouth at this point...", ">>{The_Write_Stuff} : No, they're stunned that conservative media is run by half-wits.", '>>{simxc} : Stunned? More like repeatedly disappointed with the behavior of a 70 YEAR OLD MAN.', '>>{FreedomsPower} : the only thing stunning is the low info blogs the far right pushes as news', ">>{drdreyfus} : Nothing like fighting (what's claimed to be) bad journalism with more bad journalism.", '>>{MolestedConservative} : It\'s sad that fellow Republicans focus on entertainment news instead of our horrific opiate problem. All of the polls taken at Trump\'s rallies and now through "the email" said that 73% of us trump supporters are hooked on pills, heroin and other drugs. Let\'s talk about that and how it churches, parents and communities failed us leading to this horror show.', '>>{Loxodontist} : The future president of the United States should not be this easy to provoke.', ">>{warpde} : We are not shocked that Trump hits back. It's his Modus operandi to deflect and confuse. It's how the bastard got elected in the first place.", '>>{Itsprobablysarcasm} : Remind me again when Obama dressed down right-wing media in this manner...', '>>{Itsprobablysarcasm} : Is there any proof, any evidence at all that Obama yelled and dressed down Fox News reporters? Any at all?', '>>{tupac_chopra} : this is one of those fake news things the alt right keeps shouting about, correct?', '>>{tryingtobenicereally} : I would be stunned if they were run by half-wits. I thought they were fifth-wits or at most quarter-wits.', '>>{Buttocks} : [Link](http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/obama-on-his-legacy-trumps-win-and-the-path-forward-w452527) >I think that part of it has to do with our inability, our failure, to reach those voters effectively. Part of it is Fox News in every bar and restaurant in big chunks of the country *You edited your post.', '>>{tawa6261} : OMFG - how do you ever suppose Fox ever recovered from such yelling and dressing down??', ">>{Ajreil} : Trump hits back You mean for holding people in power accountable? The media ***should*** be doing that. If Sanders or Clinton were the president elect I'd say the same thing.", ">>{Teddy2011} : This is quintessential alt right 'journalism'... High in opinion, low in fact High in emotional manipulation, low in objectivity Perfectly appeals to folks with low critical thinking ability, but who are easily emotionally incensed.", '>>{Itsprobablysarcasm} : My guess is by reporting that Obama will establish death panels and FEMA camps while waging a nonstop war on Christmas and taking guns away from patriots.', '>>{Teddy2011} : Wow he really let fox have it there. How did they ever recover from something like that? That is way worse than Trump yelling down a CNN reporter in his first press conference in over 6 months.', '>>{Buttocks} : The poster asked for proof of Obama whining about Fox, they edited their post.', ">>{Buttocks} : That's not what the poster asked for, they edited their post.", ">>{rounder55} : I'm not stunned he hits back. I used to be stunned by his level of hypocrisy/dimwittedness. Not knowing Putin was in Crimea while saying he'll never invade it as Russia had been there a year. Demanding apologies from people who criticize him while offending gold star parents, John McCain, everyone else not named Putin. That hes lied about releasing his taxes, calls a network fake news then files questions from a website that doesn't believe in global warming. That he claims he never said global warming was a Chinese hoax when tweeted it. He cant even hit back with facts. What is stunning is the level of dumb Trump makes us all on a daily basis", '>>{Teddy2011} : You said he whined about fox "all the time". What you posted can hardly be considered whining. Surely there are tons of better examples than that since he was doing it "all the time!" Let\'s see the good ones man! Trump continuously tweets that CNN is fake, failing, terrible, etc etc. I can easily pull those examples. How about you do the same for what you\'re claiming.', '>>{Buttocks} : I already offered an example, you want more?', ">>{jimmygle} : Assuming you're a troll based on the username, but if you're not, where are you getting the 73% number?", '>>{Itsprobablysarcasm} : My original and unedited post clearly states "dressing down" and **you** replied with Obama "whined" which means a) you don\'t understand the difference between the two, or b) you are purposely trying to draw an false equivalency. So I clarified. I want proof that Obama treated anyone in the right-wing media the way Trump is treating those he doesn\'t like. And it\'s fucking hilarious that you think Obama calling out the lies on Fox News is "whining".', '>>{Itsprobablysarcasm} : See, now you\'re just lying. I didn\'t say I wanted proof of "whining". You deliberately changed the goalposts from "dressing down" to whining and my post said "Proof?" and then I realized you\'d moved the goalposts.', '>>{Buttocks} : If I post another example will you change your mind, or is this a waste of time?', '>>{Teddy2011} : Sure, you claimed that he whined about fox all the time. I doubt that claim and if you prove me wrong I will admit to it.', ">>{Buttocks} : Here's a link with several examples: [Link](https://www.google.com/amp/amp.dailycaller.com/2017/01/11/the-media-is-outraged-that-trump-criticized-cnn-they-must-have-forgotten-when-obama-did-the-same-to-fox-news/?client=safari) I await your apology.", ">>{wwwes32} : None of those are even remotely close to what Trump does, and Obama did multiple interviews with Fox. He called on them in press conferences pretty regularly. Try and follow me here.... 1== 1 1 lb != 1 ton They also weren't all said within the span of two months, but whatevs.", '>>{Teddy2011} : None of that is whining in the same sense that trump relentlessly attacks any news source that is critical of him. Most of those examples are Obama saying "instead of just taking fox\'s word for it, do some more research and cross reference..." None of that is childish screaming about fake news and nazi Germany.', ">>{Teddy2011} : I would love for someone to compare and contrast Obama's measured and fair assessment of Fox's coverage of him, with how trump behaves every day.", '>>{Buttocks} : >None of that is whining in the same sense that trump relentlessly attacks any news source that is critical of him. You asked for examples of Obama whining about Fox, and I provided them. You were wrong.', '>>{Teddy2011} : Remind me again when Obama dressed down fox in this manner.. Buttocks: "Obama whined about fox all the time." Ok.. so you\'re not saying he dressed down fox, just that he recognized that fox was critical of him and pointed it out. So we\'ll just go ahead and chalk this up as a false equivalency.', ">>{Buttocks} : Obama whining about Fox has nothing to do with Trump. You do realize it's possible to judge Obama's behavior without comparing him to Trump. Fact is Obama whined about Fox News for years, you can add all the qualifiers you want but the fact remains.", '>>{Teddy2011} : The comment you responded to is literally a comparison to Trump.', ">>{Buttocks} : Remember when you said you'd admit you were wrong if I provided more examples of Obama whining about Fox? I remember.", ">>{Teddy2011} : I'm sorry that you think what Obama was doing was whining, and that you think it's comparable to Trump."], ['>>{kjellpu} : Chelsea Clinton finally finds her political voice — and it’s edgy', '>>{SniffyClock} : Careful. Saying things like that will get you downvoted.', '>>{IBringYouToBurn} : OOOOhhh spicy boy, we need another james_delaney to help keep the bull shit posts flowing to the rightie tighties', '>>{SaltHash} : >OOOH spicy girl. we needed another clinton in politics to help keep the cash flowing to the foundation baby. Right. Because only Daddy Trump can use his daughters to keep the cash flowing to their organization.', '>>{PlasticMagnate} : This family should just get out of the public eye for a little while. Just a little while. Please.', ">>{ohnothejuiceisloose} : Nice to see that she's getting under Conway's thin, shriveled, melting skin.", '>>{knox3} : Given your username, I expected a more wicked burn.', '>>{skullgenie} : We should get Chelsea to run for president in 2020. It would be tradition to get her to lose to Trump too.', '>>{sox_n_sandals} : he can always start another sub for "neutral post" that are sure to be upvoted', '>>{Roflllobster} : I mean im a democrat and id really like Chelsea Clinton to stay out of politics. I dont like politics being a family business.', ">>{IBringYouToBurn} : been banned toooo many times by the snowflakes on the right who can't handle the truth.", ">>{veridique} : If he isn't thrown out of office by thn.", ">>{placeboasis} : Good for her. This is the first time in her life that neither of her parents are in or running for office. She can speak her mind now, and I hope she does. I'd say she's earned it after putting up with decades of constant attacks on her family.", ">>{SniffyClock} : Great idea. We should have a neutral political sub that's open to all. Needs to have a broad name though... How about r/politics?", '>>{ImAHackDontLaugh} : The left literally turned having a global, effective, reputable charity into a liability. Who even has to worry about made up attacks from the GOP when your own side will swift boat you.', ">>{Icouldbeanyone} : I liked Conway's horrible attempt at a response. She really got her bringing up something her mother did! /s", '>>{dagrave} : TIL: Chelsea Clinton is 36. I am getting fucking old.', ">>{VotesSlitThroats} : I can't imagine where someone's mind must be to think Trump is a sure win in 2020. Wait, yes I do. Insane.", ">>{verbose_gent} : Is she employing consultants or a pr firm? I don't think anyone actually gives a fuck what she thinks.", ">>{Magjee} : Nice to see her get under Conway's skin   But, what office will she be running for in 2018?", ">>{JPohlman} : With respect, until Chelsea comes out and admits the DNC was unfair in it's primary and demands an end to Superdelegates, I really don't care what she says. She'll be trapped in the shadow of her parents, which isn't her fault; but she'll also be trapped there by her alignment with them, which is. The same goes for Hillary, only moreso.", '>>{CWApawn} : Whichever one she does run for, I hope she wins it just so Republicans have a massive coronary episode.', ">>{djneill} : Maybe Bernie should come out and apologise for trying to get the superdelegates to overturn the will of the people. But no you'd never condemn real shitty tactics because you've got fictional ones to complain about.", ">>{schnazzmizzles} : That's not true. Web Hubbell has been out of the spot light for a long time.", '>>{JPohlman} : The Superdelegates (like the Electoral College) ONLY exist to overturn the will of the people in cases where the people select someone clearly unfit, correct? I am against both, and I would argue both proved their uselessness in 2016. The Superdelegates didn\'t wait until after the primaries to speak. They came out in favor of Clinton so heavily on Day One that nobody, from Bernie to O\'Malley to Chafee, had a fair chance. (To say nothing of other help she got from the DNC, down to proposed character-assassination plays against "athiest" Sanders) When all of the evidence, from polls to potentially prosecutable pitfalls were taken into consideration, the Superdelegates had every objective reason to step in and say, "you know, Clinton won by a narrow margin but only with so much help, and Bernie polls above 10% over Trump," and overturn the will of the "people," which was at best a product of the SD\'s guidance in the first place! So I believe that, since they failed to do their job in putting forward the best candidate, or at least in staying out of the fucking primary until AFTER the vote was held, they should be abolished. Same premise with the Electoral College. They existed for ONE reason - to take the decision-making out of the hands of the people and give them to "the states." Except really this was supposed to prevent a populist madman from rising to power. (See the Federalist Papers for proof of this intent) Guess what? Clinton won an election, but Trump won the selection. Why? Because the EC is a stupid idea that reduces the will of some people in favor of others. So we should get rid of that, too.', '>>{S_Bek} : We are going to have Trumps head on Mt. Rushmore.', '>>{ThcLoserGuy} : Eh, rumors of her future NY senate run were everywhere right after the election. Interesting she found her voice now.', '>>{juanschwartz} : Did the investigation into the CF determine she had used funds for a wedding? Or maybe that was a podesta email?'], [">>{tjsherod} : I am a Best Buy Mobile employee. With the iPhone 7 launch soon, i'm answering any and all questions regarding: Pre-orders, pricing, carrier installment plans, carrier questions, and more!", '>>{KingWizard_IX} : If I have an iPhone 6s through T-Mobile jump, how do I preorder an iPhone 7', '>>{StupidYoure} : How about answering all the ones you just mentioned?', ">>{tjsherod} : The answers can vary on a case by case basis due to individual plans, upgrade eligibility, bill credits for installment plans, etc. It's very hard to give complete answers without the individual persons situation.", ">>{cosmolicious} : I'm on the Best Buy One Sprint plan, and have been ready for an upgrade. How would I go about preordering the new phone?", ">>{Erock2} : Bestbuy doesn't do T-Mobile so I doubt he can help that much regarding your question. But to answer it, (assuming you're on the newer version of jump) pay off 50% of the phone then go to the store and tell them you want to jump, they will ship you the 7 and you use the box to ship back the 6s.", '>>{tylerbr97} : What could I do about financing an iPhone 7 off contract? Do you have any idea on 64GB pricing?', '>>{mattbull98} : How much would a 7 pro 128 GB run me a month? Thank you in advance!', ">>{tjsherod} : Head to your nearest best buy. To preorder it at the store, you'll put down a $50 deposit but basically you're buying a $50 best buy gift card and you'll use that toward any upfront cost when you receive the phone. It's just our way of making reservations, so it'll cost you $50 for the $50 best buy gift card but you'll use it when you pick up the phone.", '>>{tjsherod} : Are you wanting to do carrier financing through a postpaid carrier like verizon, sprint, or at&t? or bringing it to a prepaid carrier?', '>>{tjsherod} : What carrier do you have? If a current carrier, what plan and data size? If new carrier, which one?', ">>{tjsherod} : Last time we had preorders, our preorder system did require a current account so we couldn't do hardware only preorder. There's a couple ways around it. What carrier do you have, or are going to?", ">>{tjsherod} : lol i wish i knew ahead of time. We don't find that out until the event, we've just been going off of rumors pointing to the 23rd based on AT&T leaks", '>>{oouzy} : I have a 6s thru Verizon that I purchased 3 months after launch, I still owe 3 payments before I can upgrade. On the Verizon app it says "click here to upgrade early" and shows my balance of 3 payments (around $125) but when I click that it shows my total remaining balance on the phone ( around 499) and keeps asking me to pay that off. When I continue with the purchase it says something like "today u owe 549 and you should expect to see a credit on your account of 300 in the next few billing cycles" is it just doing this because the 7 hasn\'t been released yet and there is technically no "upgrade" available yet? Or will I need to order over the phone with a rep? I\'m just trying to do dry runs because I live on the east coast and will be waking up at 3 am to preorder then going back to sleep and want this to be as painless as possible. Thanks for any insight', ">>{Sirenallure} : If I get iPhone 7 from Best Buy on a carrier, will I have to pay Best Buy an amount, or will the iPhone just be billed on my carrier bill, as if I ordered from Apple? I didn't know Best Buy did preorders. Do I have to pay for it online or can I pay in store (or the above question)?", '>>{tjsherod} : preorders are done in store. Everything is billed through your carrier like normal. If you do installments through your carrier, sales tax is done in store. No sort of extra cost going through us', '>>{superfastra} : I have ATT. I want to upgrade to the 7. I have $250 left to pay off the iPhone. How do I return the iPhone 6 when I do the upgrade?', ">>{tjsherod} : If you're doing the trade in to upgrade, you get shipping materials and 14 days to send back", ">>{bajubiejunior} : Dumb question but if my upgrade is on the 19th, can I pre-order a new phone before that upgrade date and still pay the upgrade price? I'm doing the 2-year contract.", ">>{x5AVAG3x} : I'm with Verizon and my upgrade date is September 20th, can I still preorder before my upgrade date if the phone won't be released until after I'm eligible for an upgrade? Or do I have to be eligible prior to being able to preorder?", '>>{tjsherod} : Are you wanting to get the phone 50% paid off to trade in and upgrade or pay it fully off and keep the 6S and upgrade?', '>>{tjsherod} : Are you wanting to do a 2 year contract or the installments? you may be able to early upgrade if you do installments, and with some plans it can be cheaper in the long run to do the installments. I can explain all of that if you tell me what your plan is and your data size for that plan is.', '>>{mattbull98} : I have T mobile but you can give me ATT numbers. I have unlimited Data with T mobile.', ">>{NoeG2018} : Not sure if this is the best place to ask but I've been on a two year contract with AT&T since the 5s came out and the contract is over. What would be the best and cheapest way to get the new iPhone, I'm still with AT&T", ">>{x5AVAG3x} : I haven't decided yet everything recently is on installment my phone now was the last with just a contract. I will most likely go the installment route and then pay off the remainder of what I owe left on another device on my installment plan. I have the new Verizon plan with 16GB of data.", '>>{superfastra} : is there still a charge to upgrade? this will be my first time upgrading through att next', ">>{tjsherod} : It's either $15 or $20 on your bill", ">>{KingWizard_IX} : I've used jump before and never had to pay off 50% of the phone", ">>{tjsherod} : Okay so AT&T has 2 plans for their installment agreements. AT&T Next and AT&T Next Every Year. Every year is a 24 month installment plan with an upgrade after the phone is 50% paid off. Standard Next is a 30 month agreement with an upgrade after the phone is 80% paid off. The 24 month agreement is better for most people. It's 41.58/mo for that. You add on $20 for line access, and then add on data cost. Data has a high speed cap and after that it slows it down. 3 GB $40 6 GB is $60 10 GB is $80 and there's more options. But the formula is the full retail cost of the phone divided by 24 or 30, plus $20 for line access, plus data. So a 6 GB plan with a 128 7 Plus is $121.58/mo.", ">>{tjsherod} : I've never ordered a phone through verizon's website, but i know the way it works in store at best buy is we pull up your number to do an upgrade and it gives us the option to pay up or pay off. Pay up is to get you to 50%, and then we give you an envelope to send the old one back within 14 days. So you'd pay however much in store to get to 50% and then you'd pay sales tax on the new phone, and send the old phone back using our shipping materials.", '>>{tjsherod} : What plan do you have and what data size is it?', ">>{tjsherod} : Sometimes sprint gives you a two year upgrade a week or two before your contract actually expires. That way when people get the notification they can upgrade and immediately go and sign another 2 year contract with sprint and sprint doesn't have to worry about people falling out of contract and switching. Best thing to do is call sprint and say you wanna preorder the new iphone but your two year contract isn't up when preorders start. See if they can give you an early upgrade. Might not work but it's something to try. Also sprint does not do 2 year contracts in store anymore, but best buy still does.", ">>{tjsherod} : You most likely should be able to do an early upgrade on installments if you're that close to the end of your 2 year contract from my experience dealing with hundreds of instances like that. If you're currently on a 2 year contract your line access should be $40/mo, on installments its $20/mo. So take the monthly installment amount and subtract 20 from it to see how much extra it will be each month. Installment activation fee is $20, 2 year contract activation fee is $40.", '>>{tjsherod} : What plan are you on and what data size?', '>>{bobbys360} : You can order through Apple 7 days early. I have done this and I am with Verizon. You can also trade your Iphone into Verizon and get a gift card to apply to your bill as well. I am still on the 2 year contract as well.', '>>{tjsherod} : Are you on "The Verizon Plan" 1 GB?', ">>{NoeG2018} : I've been on this plan for a long time this was back when AT&T was on a two year contract. So I was on the two year contract with AT&T, and I have a 10gb data plan that is shared with my family", '>>{tjsherod} : So AT&T does their Next plan. 24 month agreement w/ annual upgrade. If your line access is currently $40, the installment does not stack on top of the $40. Your line access will drop to $15 and then the installment goes on top of your that. So if your line access is still $40, then the installments will only be a few dollars a month', ">>{oouzy} : Yea that's perfect, I just hope they let me do it like that on the website now that the phone is out", '>>{lauradiamandis} : There have actually been three different versions of JUMP. One allows you to upgrade once the phone is halfway paid off or twice a year, one is just halfway paid off, and one is up to three upgrades yearly without paying the phone halfway off. I work at t mobile and it is very confusing', '>>{edwardmassa1994} : Will Best Buy employees be able to preorder the iPhone 7? I know in the past we were unable to and had to wait for actual release day after all preorders were taken care of. Also, any word on any promos?', ">>{tjsherod} : I think it's up to your management. iPhone 7 is going to universal carrier device so it's going to be a first come first serve basis as they'll no longer be carrier specific for our inventory and we'll just get sim cards for that carrier. No word on promos.", '>>{lol_elijah} : Hey what kind of promotions should we expect when the phone launches? Does the promo apply when you preorder or when you pick up the phone?', '>>{HuskyStyle18} : I preordered an iPhone 7 and Apple Watch Series 2 and in my email it says "Item has been pre-ordered - GET IT BY: FRI 09/16" for both items. Would you say it\'s pretty likely that the two items will arrive 9/16 at my house?', '>>{tjsherod} : You should get it by sunday, most likely friday though', '>>{bchads5} : I ordered a Black Iphone 7 Plus 128 gb at about 4 am on friday and had it so i pick it up at the store. It says "Expected release date: 09/16/2016". Should i be able to pick it up by the end of the weekend? Also does Best Buy usually stock for walk ins?', '>>{tjsherod} : You should be able to pick it up by the end of the weekend, and any walk in stock will be very limited as the iphones are no longer carrier specific for inventory and we just get a sim card for that carrier.', ">>{sweetdubbro} : I pre ordered an iP7+ through bestbuy.com at 1am when orderes opened up.I'm concerned that I wont get my phone on release day (16th). It stills processing on my order status but on my att account it says I cant purchase another device with an installment plan (assuming its because I just bought one). Is there any way to find out when my phone is coming? I'd like to cancel if its not coming on the 16th and take my chances at the store on release day.", ">>{tjsherod} : You should have it the 16th. That's why some say sold out online cause we don't sell preorders that won't be guaranteed launch day", '>>{sweetdubbro} : Thanks! I hope, im leaving the state and would like to have my new phone, just a little concerning that its Wednesday and it hasnt moved past processing onto preparing for shipment.', '>>{Gbpackers22} : Just ordered a 7+ 128GB unactivated(Verizon Wireless model) and the delivery date is 10/5-10/14, is this true?', '>>{Gbpackers22} : :( the order status is still the same.. "backordered"'], [">>{ManWithASquareHead} : I'll believe it when I see it. Hearings tomorrow and there's still time for Burr to run around playing Ruskimon", ">>{moxxon} : How about consequences for Nunes fucking up the House investigation and we get that back on track. Both probes should continue. Nunes buffoonery shouldn't be allowed to derail one of them.", '>>{thewholedamnplanet} : Well if "politicized" you mean those being investigated are in charge of the investigation and are doing everything they can to derail it.', '>>{Heaven_Knows} : I agree that the Senate investigation is our only hope at finding the truth right now as long as Nunes is heading up the House investigation. I just hope that the Senate Committee is open to having the public hearings that the House Committee was originally going to have. I also hope that it won\'t get tanked by the Republican side if there are findings in a public hearing that put some "heat" on the President and his administration.', '>>{ivsciguy} : Guess we just have to get an independent prosecutor.....', '>>{sdfsdfsdffdffff} : What if Senate pulls the same stunt? All this proves is that Republicans should never be allowed to be majority party.', ">>{Heaven_Knows} : Yeah, I'm hoping that doesn't happen. If it does, we will have to hope the FBI investigation can get it done. Also, I agree the republican majority in both the senate and house is a huge problem. Hopefully, we the people can affect change in the 2018 mid terms.", '>>{Grizzly_Corey} : Ahh the age-old "I know you are but what am I?" unsolvable retort to this day. How will we ever progress as a species?', ">>{ChicagoJohn123} : If it's overly politicized we could replace it with a non-partisan independent prosecutor.", '>>{HumanLikeYou155} : I think it was Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut who was on MSNBC last night that was saying the first session is just going to be a basic introductory meeting and that the major witnesses would be coming later.', '>>{Lextucky} : Establishment Republicans need to get their tax cuts, deregulation and Gorsuch through first before looking too hard into all of this. After those are accomplished, President Pence will sound better to them immediately.', ">>{noahcallaway-wa} : We should not simply rely on the FBI. As long as the Senate investigation continues I'm...okay. If the R's blow up the Senate investigation, it's time to buy a plane ticket to DC.", '>>{Delta_V09} : The FBI investigation is really the one that matters as far as building a case and collecting evidence to use in a trial. The main purpose of the House/Senate investigations is to shift popular opinion and gather political support.']]

classify and reply

['>>{Um_Nope_Sorry} : On King day, Trump to meet with Martin Luther King III', ">>{JavascriptFanboy} : Islamic State says U.S. 'being run by an idiot'", ">>{conanthecnidarian} : A lot of people are going to lose their insurance. And there's really no predicting how else Republicans will try to limit access considering they will have more power than they've had since Bush. >health departments are going to stop offering it. Health departments? What is a health department?", '>>{cheapbutnotfree} : How dare this administration make me agree with ISIS.', '>>{JavascriptFanboy} : yeah my thoughts as well... I was like, will Trump and his administration unite every force in the world against them? It\'s like the plot in "The Watchmen", come to think of it.', ">>{SaltHash} : >wtf? really? It's not like insurances aren't going to cover it and the health departments are going to stop offering it. From the article: > No-cost birth control has been a game-changer for women. WTF? Really? It is not hard to understand why women with low income will no longer have access to birth control they cannot afford. Also, it is not to hard to understand that repealing ObamaCare means those people will not have insurance. Additionally, low income jobs typically do not have insurance because the employers do not offer reasonably priced policies.", '>>{HighHopesHobbit} : Well, you know that saying about murderous terrorist groups and stopped clocks...', '>>{ag507} : Is SNL taking it too far insulting President Trump?', ">>{DC25NYC} : Don't worry since they'll likely make it harder to have abortions, im sure they'll ramp up teaching safe sex or at least increase welfare for those who have a child unprepared... It's not like they're just going to teach abstinence in certain states and cut welfare funding! s/", ">>{thesilvertongue} : I'm more worried about abortion. Wish I'm considering trying to stock up on those drugs.", ">>{onetoughmotherfucker} : I'm broke but if I wasn't I would buy as much Plan B as I could afford and give it out for free.", ">>{OnepDoublem} : Not far enough. I still feel like they're pulling too many punches.", '>>{saturnengr0} : And expect planned parenthood to be shut down, thereby eliminating heath care access of millions of low income, rural women', '>>{onetoughmotherfucker} : Separation of church and state IDGAF about their religion. They can practice w/e nonsense they want. They *cannot* force those views on other people through legislation. And the comment I replied to said "it\'s not like they\'ll take birth control away"...when that\'s exactly what Hobby Lobby did to their employees.', ">>{llcooldre} : Isis won't attack us because trump is doing the work for them", '>>{emceenoesis} : We need to call stopped clocks what they are if we have any hope of defeating them.', ">>{Quinnjester} : You know what's sad many presidents wouldn't even do this cause they weren't freaking racists and had to prove a point.", ">>{another_sunnyday} : > the contraception mandate is not a law. It’s a rule put in place by HHS. And HHS, under a Trump White House, could change that rule without input from Congress. I coincidentally got an IUD before the election. It's one less thing to worry about, and will (hopefully) last longer than a Trump presidency", '>>{FirstDimensionFilms} : Well they said that about Obama too. They are our enemies of course they are going to say that. Fuck ISIS though.', '>>{scaredog20} : Trump responded "I know you are but what am I."', '>>{qpzmwxom} : Can we not upvote what the Islamic State says?', ">>{notjabba} : I guess Trump meets with the son because all he knows is nepotism. If he wants to talk to the true intellectual heir of King's movement, he should talk to that John Lewis guy instead of insulting him on Twitter.", '>>{BeeLuv} : Donate to Planned Parenthood. Even $5 can make a huge difference. https://www.plannedparenthood.org/ Care. No matter what.', ">>{NotJohnMiller} : It is not the government's job to hand out free birth control. It is also not the government's job to fund abortions.", '>>{iamjacksprofile} : Why? Why not give something like food to the homeless or toys for children in need? Why plan b?', '>>{iamjacksprofile} : Toys For Tots or Feeding America is a much better cause this time of the year.', '>>{immakeeprunnin} : Women who want contraception: look into getting an IUD. Anyone who cares about this very real threat: donate to Planned Parenthood. If you have private insurance, make an appointment there so they can benefit from private funding (yes, even men can receive services!) Warn anyone you know about Crisis Pregnancy Centers that masquerade as legitimate health clinics and peddle false information about abortion under the guise of free speech. And write to your elected representatives to let them know your thoughts.', ">>{LibTears4Lubricant} : > Can you get any more pathetic than this? Yes, you can be a liberal who parrots the talking points of a terrorist organization in an attempt to shame your own country's elected president. Embarrassing indeed.", ">>{kanyefan125} : John Lewis is far from the heir of king's movement. King advocated for unity, peace and equality, you think you would see him calling the president illegitimate?", '>>{onetoughmotherfucker} : because my state will be the first to ban plan b when given the opportunity', '>>{osaucyone} : Is he taking it too far insulting democrats, the former president, private citizens? All is fair in love and war. Satire serves an important part in a society that wishes to push back against leaders and keep them in check.', ">>{Um_Nope_Sorry} : The one who called him an illegitimate President? Personally, I think that's a great way for an intellectual to open a dialog. I distinctly remember Obama taking the time to reach out to the people that called him a Muslim interloper.", ">>{CarbonRevenge} : Not at all. He's easy to make fun of.", ">>{conanthecnidarian} : I'm pretty sure everyone agrees with ISIS on this except Donald Trump and all of his children except Tiffany.", ">>{miltedmalkball} : The rub is that the secret Muslim sorry was a clear fabrication. We're still learning whether and to what extent Trump was legitimately elected.", '>>{Swimwithamermaid} : I feel bad for you. Bot or not.', '>>{blue_whaoo} : No. Not pointing out the continuous corruption, irresponsibility and outright stupidity of his presidency is akin to normalizing it. It was wrong, and needed to be critiqued on day and is just as wrong now.', '>>{DebussySIMiami} : Martin Luther King III looks like he ate Martin Luther Kings 1 & 2.', ">>{JavascriptFanboy} : that's the moral dilemma of this topic. You know it's right, you want to upvote it, but ... Islamic State.", ">>{NarnBatSquad} : Yeah, no. They're being way too gentle, and they've only just begun to widen their aim to include Ivanka and Sessions. If the ignorant dent-faces in the linked discussion think their side is being ridiculed now, just wait six months.", ">>{notjabba} : Trump is illegitimate based upon Comey and Putin's interference, which clearly put him over the edge in the electoral college despite his massive loss of the popular vote. Lewis made an excellent argument regarding the subject. Trump did not address his argument, instead using his standard method of insulting the messenger.", ">>{shittyvonshittenheit} : So if ISIS says 2+2=4 i'm just parroting a terrorist talking point?", ">>{tundey_1} : Seriously though, what did Tiffany ever do to Trump? It's like if you are a daughter of his and he doesn't want to f**k you, you are nothing to him. If I was Jared, I'll watch my back while running these errands for Trump.", '>>{nodogo} : They have made fun of every president since they were formed. I\'m sure Ford loved tuning in every week to see Chevy bumbling around like an idiot then fall down acting as him. the difference is this time Trump keeps harping on it and giving them fuel while almost every other president has just ignored it. "Kimmel noted his previous night’s guest Alec Baldwin has been playing Trump on Saturday Night Live and wondered if Bush had been bothered when that show lampooned him during his presidency. “Not at all,” Bush said, explaining that “the best humor is when you make fun of yourself.” “Tell that to the president. He doesn’t think so,” Kimmel said, of notoriously thin-skinned Trump. Bush said he thought the guy who played him best was Steve Bridges. “He’s dead,” Bush said. “Did you have anything to do with his death?” Kimmel wondered, understandably. “I hope not,” Bush deadpanned. Bridges is the guy who appeared with Bush at the 2006 White House Correspondents dinner, playing his alter-ego."', '>>{PM_ME_TRUMP_PISS_VID} : As opposed to parroting the talking points of a terrorist axis and supporting a coup. Also, shift change in Stalingrad.', '>>{gaeuvyen} : Temporal Gauge Extremists are a bane on the 4th dimension, we cannot let their evil ideology poison our short term gains!', ">>{NotJohnMiller} : It is not your right to have an abortion. If you want to go have sex and think there are no consequences, you're wrong.", ">>{Jaf207} : >i dont know about you, but i am sick of snl making fun of President Trump. Its disrespectful and they are putting negative messages and poisoning people's minds. He is our president and i think its about time they move on to something else. Its really not funny anymore. I think they should be cancelled if they continue to disrespect trump in the future. Now this is funny.", ">>{Yggdras1l} : Butt there so mene about prezident. They need 2 reespect... Ok yeah that hurts. The grammar of those who are protecting Trump is atrocious and just places more evidence to the lack of education. It's simple humor and free speech and they have the right to remain subscribed to the_donald instead of watching SNL. I pity them.", ">>{PugiPugiPugi43} : The fact that his supporters believe Trump is a manly free speech warrior and blatantly look over that trump is a pussy who can't even stand meanie SNL really tells you something.", '>>{ag507} : I am not supportive of SNL doing this. It is disrespectful to OUR President Trump. Yes It is meant to be funny, but is really distasteful. I am not advocating media crack down like in the old days in Russia or now in China, but this is just as bad of an extreme. Other than the ratings for SNL, our country loses getting further polarized by these distasteful jokes.', ">>{Um_Nope_Sorry} : So would Hillary have been illegitimate by virtue of Entertaining Tonight's leaked audio tapes?", '>>{notjabba} : It is despicable that modern day bigots attempt to claim King as one of their own. King was a radical and highly controversial in his day. He opposed people like Trump. His every word and action belied his opposition to the kind of ignorant nativism that is at the heart of Trumpism. At least MLK\'s opponents in his day had the decency to admit their opposition. I suspect that if King were alive today he would be standing beside John Lewis speaking out against Donald Trump. It is impossible to imagine him supporting the modern day Republican party, which stands forcefully against "unity, peace and equality."', ">>{deancame06} : It's comedy, nothing is off limits in comedy. If you get butt hurt over a joke, it's time to lighten the fuck up.", '>>{immigrantpatriot} : Who died & put you in charge of where people donate their money?', ">>{berrieh} : > It is not the government's job to hand out free birth control. Free/subsidized birth control saves the government more money than it costs. http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2012/03/06/148042609/how-birth-control-saves-taxpayers-money I would say it is the government's job to protect its own fiscal interests and that of society's.", ">>{gaeuvyen} : you mean the same liberals who have been calling Trump an idiot since the 80's roughly 30 years before ISIS existed? most people think Trump is a moron. If he wasn't born with a golden stick up his butt, he'd probably be homeless.", '>>{tau-lepton} : Advocating censorship is a kind of free speech I guess.', '>>{kanyefan125} : I never said he would support Trump, just that if he opposed him, he would do so in a different way. My guess is he would be more similar to this civil rights leader, who was also marching in the movement with John Lewis, who is waiting to see what Trump does and would oppose him when necessary. This is a true image of unity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUNIAi9Xq5k', '>>{trump2020maga-} : r/politics supports terrorists over our president. shameful', ">>{luckykobold} : Oh my god, who've thunk the ones throwing the snowflake label around would turn out to be ginormous fucking snowflakes? The whole Republican party weeps at any slight nowadays.", '>>{pikhq} : Did they allege she was a servant of Russia and Russian interests?', '>>{DenialGene} : I am 100% supportive of SNL and 0% supportive of any attack on the first amendment.', ">>{sexy_mofo1} : Wow you *really wanted* this article to be seen. Can't say I'm all that surprised that a regular of ETS would have no qualms with giving the words of mass murdering rapists and terrorists as much exposure as you possibly could.", ">>{notjabba} : No, the two situations are not comparable. The Entertainment Tonight leak showed Trump for what he truly is. They were legitimately leaked by private parties far ahead of the election. Comey, on the other hand, made a statement days before the election that revealed no new information whatsoever. He used his public office to effect an election. It is completely different and not comparable. Putin's influence is also completely different and not comparable. And of course there is no Clinton equivalent to Trumps planned constitutional violations on day one of his presidency. He is accepting payment from foreign powers (read: cash bribes) at multiple businesses he owns. Any Senator who does not vote to impeach him is in dereliction of duty. In all fairness, I am not suggesting that Trump not be sworn in, there is no mechanism for preventing his ascent. But that is not the only meaning of illegitimate. He is illegitimate because Comey and Russia broke American law in delivering him the presidency and he himself will be in violation of the constitution on his first day in office.", ">>{SuicideInALucidDream} : > I am not advocating media crack down like in the old days in Russia or now in China, but this is just as bad of an extreme A show making fun of your idiot president is just as bad as a fascist government cracking down on media for saying things they don't like? lol And I'm sure you wouldn't have a problem with SNL doing this to Hillary if she won.", '>>{kthoag} : President Trump is a fucking idiot and deserves ridicule. Yes, unfortunately, he is OUR President, but he is a clown and clowns are laughed at.', '>>{JavascriptFanboy} : I would say Trump did that for them but..oh wait, i said it. I find it particularly funny how even these rapists and murderers know that Trump is incompetent lel', '>>{NotJohnMiller} : So you believe it is the job of the taxpayer to pay for people to have protected sex?', '>>{celestialwaffle} : If Entertainment Tonight was a federal agency influenced by pro-Russian elements intending to sway the election from the get go, yes.', '>>{nychuman} : This comment is such a great example of a straw man. Great job! Sad!', '>>{breadandfaxes} : So, the pharmaceutical companies win again, right? Fuck republicans.', ">>{trtsmb} : Expert redditor with his 34 minute old account. He hasn't had time to develop reading comprehension skills or the ability to read at all.", ">>{sockmahbawls} : To be fair I'm sure they would be saying the same thing if Hillary won and was being targeted by SNL unfairly. ^/s Edit: dropped some letters", '>>{berrieh} : Studies show the taxpayer experiences a financial benefit (it costs *less*) for these policies, so that question makes literally no sense in the context of the discussion.', '>>{celestialwaffle} : You don\'t see the difference between "here\'s some evidence why this guy is a bad from a TV source" and selected and targeted leaking of info from a government source, true or not, to influence an election on behalf of a foreign government?', ">>{solarbrigadier} : No. He said it's the government's job to promote the best outcome for society. You are arguing that the action is what is morally important, effects are irrelevant. He's arguing the effects of the action are what's morally important, how you got there isn't important. Deontology vs Utilitarianism.", ">>{75962410687} : John Lewis is not the intellectual heir of King's movement by a longshot. I don't even know how you could pretend to make that statement with any seriousness.", '>>{trtsmb} : Unfortunately, they are correct that the US is being lead by a clueless idiot.', '>>{Gisneurh} : If he gives out plan b that will make fewer children in need.', ">>{Gisneurh} : How come it's okay to pay for men to have sex? At least BC is used for more than pregnancy prevention. Tax dollars pay for Viagra and that's literally paying old men to have sex.", ">>{QwertyHutJr} : Texas already has the highest mother mortality rate of the entire first world, lack of women's health resources are killing many who don't need to die. Mothers shouldn't be dying in childbirth like it's fucking 1820.", '>>{tmc_throwaway} : I think Breitbart has been on the receiving end of the invisible middle finger of the free market with its advertiser exodus.', ">>{RevolverRubberSoul} : There is not one single solitary piece of evidence that he was not legitimately elected yet a solid majority of the hypocritical left are calling the guy a Manchurian candidate. No it's not better than the he birther idiots and if you can't see how hypocritical liberals are right. Is then you are part of the partisan problem", '>>{ag507} : I will defend the position that should be limits to this media craziness attacks. Media companies banned PewDiePie YouTube personality for making antisemitic remarks, but SNL is attacking the elected President of the United States. We should not have a double standard for an unqualified position that any media action is justified under a banned of " freedom of speech".', '>>{RevolverRubberSoul} : I can "allege" you are a sexual predator and claim I have proof but it\'s classified. Look up the word allege next time and learn the difference between allegations and evidence', '>>{QwertyHutJr} : Toys vs. Healthcare. Oh yeah, toys are way more important /s', ">>{onetoughmotherfucker} : > Mothers shouldn't be dying in childbirth like it's fucking 1820. Our legislators are salivating at the idea of going back to 1820 :/", '>>{NotJohnMiller} : What it boils down to is that the taypayers are paying for people to prevent babies, no matter what way of prevention "costs less". This seems morally wrong to me. If you don\'t want a baby, don\'t have sex. It\'s that simple. Taxpayers shouldn\'t have to flip the bill just because some people want to fuck without consequences.', '>>{ctdca} : If you really want to "make America great," well, the freedom to openly criticize and make fun of our political leaders is a big part of what has historically made America special. SNL is continuing a long, long line of patriotic American discourse. Here in the US you\'re free to disagree with them or not watch, but if we stop allowing (and encouraging) criticism of the government, we pretty quickly become just one more dictatorial shithole. There are already enough of those out there. Part of being the President is having the strength to brush off criticism and caricature. Let\'s not tear down what truly made this country great for the sake of one man\'s vanity.', '>>{snackbot7000} : You must be the most beautiful and unique of all the snowflakes.', ">>{iamjacksprofile} : I think giving toys to needy children at Christmas is a more worthy cause than having a stranger approach women on the street and handing out free fuck pills from your Plan B surplus. That's some creeper shit right there.", '>>{SaltHash} : Donnie repeatedly ranted about political correctness as an alleged problem with society. Also, he repeatedly insults various people and demographics. So nobody has to be politically correct for that whiny buttercup.', ">>{letdogsvote} : 1. If you can't stand the heat... 2. After the non stop disrespect, discourtesy, and general dirt treatment of Obama for eight years, the right has zero basis to bitch about critiquing Trump.", ">>{miltedmalkball} : IC disagrees with your assessment. I'm not a liberal so I don't particularly care if you find them hypocritical.", '>>{luckykobold} : The idiocy of the above comment stands for itself, but notice the specific reference to the "old days" of Russia versus today. This random offended Joe six-pack seems to be very careful about accidentally saying anything negative about Putin. Also notice the omission of the article in "advocating media crack down"-- there are no articles in Russian, and their use is one of the harder concepts for Russians to master about English. You will find that many redditors who have been lately defending Trump (often with links to obscure, never-before-heard-of websites) also struggle with the omission of articles. Crazy, crazy coincidence there. But who am I to cast aspersions on a 17-day-old account that posts nothing but pro-Trump garbage?', ">>{ctdca} : I don't think this dude is even American, to be honest.", ">>{iamjacksprofile} : Approaching women and offering them free anti contraceptive pills from your Plan B supply is creepy, donating to Toys For Tots isn't. I don't think people really think these things through.", ">>{RevolverRubberSoul} : IC also led us into Iraq with no proof. IC fabricated the evidence way back around the Gulf of Tonkin. What's ironic about all of this is that in a free country you are supposed to question your government . The vast majority of liberals and their neo conservative friends refuse to do that now because they do not like the results of the presidential election. Why can't the IC release something that has proof behind it ? A letter is not proof . That would be like going into a courtroom and saying in a letter that a person committed a murder and that another person has the murder weapon but the court cannot see it because it's classified so just trust my letter . There is an unreasonable amount of classified information today.", '>>{miltedmalkball} : I agree we need more inquiry and more information. That is consistent with my comment above.', ">>{celestialwaffle} : If you're sincere about wanting an explanation, /u/notjabba just provided one better than I could ever do. Otherwise, um, nope, sorry.", '>>{NotJohnMiller} : I agree with you. Government money should not be used to pay for men to get Viagra either. This is why I am against government-controlled healthcare.', ">>{NowAfterMe} : Hahaha. This is rich. Trump's been in office 50 days and they're already crying? Does anyone remember the 90s? It was nonstop Clinton/Lewinsky craziness every week on SNL. Sorry about your fee fees, Trumpites.", '>>{Ed_Tivrusky_IV} : So what can they do for men? Genuinely curious. Going to google it now. **Edit** [Here you go, for anyone wondering.](https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/men)', '>>{Um_Nope_Sorry} : > Comey, on the other hand, made a statement days before the election that revealed no new information whatsoever. His statement did reveal new information though. He stated that they found additional e-mails pertinent to the investigation. Those e-mails happened to not have any damning information, but he made an announcement about an investigation being re-opened because an investigation into Hillary actually was being re-opened.', ">>{papanico180} : I'm sure that simple solution will work out great! Good thinkin.", ">>{berrieh} : I mean, even if you look at sex as immoral or sinful, which your worldview requires (otherwise, you're just supporting healthcare), tax payers shouldn't have to foot the bill to prevent crime (because crime shouldn't be happening) or fight wars against global instability (because terrorism shouldn't be happening and countries shouldn't be fighting wars), but I live in the real world where sex is going to be had and we can simply make it less expensive to society as a whole. No one is a loser here -- taxpayers pay less, people get the healthcare they want and need, and people get to enjoy a healthy sex life without massive consequences to themselves or society. We pay to prevent crime, we pay to prevent terrorism... why is paying to prevent unwelcome babies that exacerbate socio-economic problems a step too far for anyone, especially when unlike the other policies, this one more than pays for itself and is a **financial** benefit/win for taxpayers when you look at the net effects?", ">>{notjabba} : Please. He was a loyal Republican making statements to the news media that were carefully timed to hurt Clinton's campaign. There were various investigations into Trump going on at the same time but Comey followed FBI policy and kept quiet about those.", ">>{ctdca} : >You will find that many redditors who have been lately defending Trump (often with links to obscure, never-before-heard-of websites) also struggle with the omission of articles. Crazy, crazy coincidence there. Yup. They're all over this sub.", ">>{AncientSummoner} : SNL has always, and will always, make fun of presidents. The problem is that Trump has such a fragile ego that even commenting on his terrible wig sets him off. SNL was brutal to Bush, but did Bush lash out? No, he laughed at it and carried on. Trump and his administration cannot handle any sort of criticism, so they are stifling everything as much as they can. It boggles the mind that these men are in position that are meant to be criticized, scrutinized, talked about in great depth, and they cannot shrug anything off or accept that others will not agree with them. If someone doesn't agree with me, I do not insult them, or tell them they should be killed, or kicked out of my country. I ask them why do they disagree, we have a discussion, and sometimes opinions change. That is called being civil and open-minded, something the GOP and Trump will absolutely never embrace. I say SNL should continue doing their comedic sketches. They're funny again and help hammer the ridiculousness of this administration.", '>>{knee-of-justice} : Lol he never said he was going to do that?', '>>{pervocracy} : >If you don\'t want a baby, don\'t have sex. Even married people? Shit. That\'s pretty harsh. (I mean, it\'s equally harsh for single people, but the whole "don\'t have sex if you can\'t accept the consequences" always seems to imply that all sex is young people casually hooking up. Not, say, longterm couples who have two children but don\'t want a third.)', ">>{NarnBatSquad} : He's not *our* President. By his own admission, he represents only the Republican party, and thus he is entitled to no respect at all, and neither are his supporters.", ">>{luckykobold} : Your reasoning and grasp of the English language are decidedly, er, *different* somehow from other Americans. I think you've outed yourself. Time to retire this account and start up a new one.", '>>{WednesdaySloth} : Why not? Sex is an awesome, healthy activity, and I have no problem paying for protection if people want to have consensual sex.', ">>{Samseaster} : Yup. I am writing this while lying in the fetal position from getting a five year iud put in today. I made the call to my doctor the day after trump was elected. I don't want trump or pence making any decisions about my body.", '>>{berrieh} : Uh, no one suggested handing out Plan B pills to strangers, certainly Planned Parenthood is not going to do that with donations... Someone upthread did mention giving Plan B out to *people who need it*, presumably upon request, and as something he/she could not afford to actually do. Certainly the person never said they wanted to walk around the street handing it out... But either way, this is about donating to Planned Parenthood.', '>>{nliausacmmv} : >It is not your right to have an abortion. The US Supreme Court would seem to disagree with that statement.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{ag507} : Is SNL taking it too far insulting President Trump?', ">>{OnepDoublem} : Not far enough. I still feel like they're pulling too many punches.", '>>{osaucyone} : Is he taking it too far insulting democrats, the former president, private citizens? All is fair in love and war. Satire serves an important part in a society that wishes to push back against leaders and keep them in check.', ">>{CarbonRevenge} : Not at all. He's easy to make fun of.", '>>{blue_whaoo} : No. Not pointing out the continuous corruption, irresponsibility and outright stupidity of his presidency is akin to normalizing it. It was wrong, and needed to be critiqued on day and is just as wrong now.', ">>{NarnBatSquad} : Yeah, no. They're being way too gentle, and they've only just begun to widen their aim to include Ivanka and Sessions. If the ignorant dent-faces in the linked discussion think their side is being ridiculed now, just wait six months.", '>>{nodogo} : They have made fun of every president since they were formed. I\'m sure Ford loved tuning in every week to see Chevy bumbling around like an idiot then fall down acting as him. the difference is this time Trump keeps harping on it and giving them fuel while almost every other president has just ignored it. "Kimmel noted his previous night’s guest Alec Baldwin has been playing Trump on Saturday Night Live and wondered if Bush had been bothered when that show lampooned him during his presidency. “Not at all,” Bush said, explaining that “the best humor is when you make fun of yourself.” “Tell that to the president. He doesn’t think so,” Kimmel said, of notoriously thin-skinned Trump. Bush said he thought the guy who played him best was Steve Bridges. “He’s dead,” Bush said. “Did you have anything to do with his death?” Kimmel wondered, understandably. “I hope not,” Bush deadpanned. Bridges is the guy who appeared with Bush at the 2006 White House Correspondents dinner, playing his alter-ego."', ">>{Jaf207} : >i dont know about you, but i am sick of snl making fun of President Trump. Its disrespectful and they are putting negative messages and poisoning people's minds. He is our president and i think its about time they move on to something else. Its really not funny anymore. I think they should be cancelled if they continue to disrespect trump in the future. Now this is funny.", ">>{Yggdras1l} : Butt there so mene about prezident. They need 2 reespect... Ok yeah that hurts. The grammar of those who are protecting Trump is atrocious and just places more evidence to the lack of education. It's simple humor and free speech and they have the right to remain subscribed to the_donald instead of watching SNL. I pity them.", ">>{PugiPugiPugi43} : The fact that his supporters believe Trump is a manly free speech warrior and blatantly look over that trump is a pussy who can't even stand meanie SNL really tells you something.", '>>{ag507} : I am not supportive of SNL doing this. It is disrespectful to OUR President Trump. Yes It is meant to be funny, but is really distasteful. I am not advocating media crack down like in the old days in Russia or now in China, but this is just as bad of an extreme. Other than the ratings for SNL, our country loses getting further polarized by these distasteful jokes.', ">>{deancame06} : It's comedy, nothing is off limits in comedy. If you get butt hurt over a joke, it's time to lighten the fuck up.", '>>{tau-lepton} : Advocating censorship is a kind of free speech I guess.', ">>{luckykobold} : Oh my god, who've thunk the ones throwing the snowflake label around would turn out to be ginormous fucking snowflakes? The whole Republican party weeps at any slight nowadays.", '>>{DenialGene} : I am 100% supportive of SNL and 0% supportive of any attack on the first amendment.', ">>{SuicideInALucidDream} : > I am not advocating media crack down like in the old days in Russia or now in China, but this is just as bad of an extreme A show making fun of your idiot president is just as bad as a fascist government cracking down on media for saying things they don't like? lol And I'm sure you wouldn't have a problem with SNL doing this to Hillary if she won.", '>>{kthoag} : President Trump is a fucking idiot and deserves ridicule. Yes, unfortunately, he is OUR President, but he is a clown and clowns are laughed at.', ">>{sockmahbawls} : To be fair I'm sure they would be saying the same thing if Hillary won and was being targeted by SNL unfairly. ^/s Edit: dropped some letters", '>>{tmc_throwaway} : I think Breitbart has been on the receiving end of the invisible middle finger of the free market with its advertiser exodus.', '>>{ag507} : I will defend the position that should be limits to this media craziness attacks. Media companies banned PewDiePie YouTube personality for making antisemitic remarks, but SNL is attacking the elected President of the United States. We should not have a double standard for an unqualified position that any media action is justified under a banned of " freedom of speech".', '>>{ctdca} : If you really want to "make America great," well, the freedom to openly criticize and make fun of our political leaders is a big part of what has historically made America special. SNL is continuing a long, long line of patriotic American discourse. Here in the US you\'re free to disagree with them or not watch, but if we stop allowing (and encouraging) criticism of the government, we pretty quickly become just one more dictatorial shithole. There are already enough of those out there. Part of being the President is having the strength to brush off criticism and caricature. Let\'s not tear down what truly made this country great for the sake of one man\'s vanity.', '>>{snackbot7000} : You must be the most beautiful and unique of all the snowflakes.', '>>{SaltHash} : Donnie repeatedly ranted about political correctness as an alleged problem with society. Also, he repeatedly insults various people and demographics. So nobody has to be politically correct for that whiny buttercup.', ">>{letdogsvote} : 1. If you can't stand the heat... 2. After the non stop disrespect, discourtesy, and general dirt treatment of Obama for eight years, the right has zero basis to bitch about critiquing Trump.", '>>{luckykobold} : The idiocy of the above comment stands for itself, but notice the specific reference to the "old days" of Russia versus today. This random offended Joe six-pack seems to be very careful about accidentally saying anything negative about Putin. Also notice the omission of the article in "advocating media crack down"-- there are no articles in Russian, and their use is one of the harder concepts for Russians to master about English. You will find that many redditors who have been lately defending Trump (often with links to obscure, never-before-heard-of websites) also struggle with the omission of articles. Crazy, crazy coincidence there. But who am I to cast aspersions on a 17-day-old account that posts nothing but pro-Trump garbage?', ">>{ctdca} : I don't think this dude is even American, to be honest.", ">>{NowAfterMe} : Hahaha. This is rich. Trump's been in office 50 days and they're already crying? Does anyone remember the 90s? It was nonstop Clinton/Lewinsky craziness every week on SNL. Sorry about your fee fees, Trumpites.", ">>{ctdca} : >You will find that many redditors who have been lately defending Trump (often with links to obscure, never-before-heard-of websites) also struggle with the omission of articles. Crazy, crazy coincidence there. Yup. They're all over this sub.", ">>{AncientSummoner} : SNL has always, and will always, make fun of presidents. The problem is that Trump has such a fragile ego that even commenting on his terrible wig sets him off. SNL was brutal to Bush, but did Bush lash out? No, he laughed at it and carried on. Trump and his administration cannot handle any sort of criticism, so they are stifling everything as much as they can. It boggles the mind that these men are in position that are meant to be criticized, scrutinized, talked about in great depth, and they cannot shrug anything off or accept that others will not agree with them. If someone doesn't agree with me, I do not insult them, or tell them they should be killed, or kicked out of my country. I ask them why do they disagree, we have a discussion, and sometimes opinions change. That is called being civil and open-minded, something the GOP and Trump will absolutely never embrace. I say SNL should continue doing their comedic sketches. They're funny again and help hammer the ridiculousness of this administration.", ">>{NarnBatSquad} : He's not *our* President. By his own admission, he represents only the Republican party, and thus he is entitled to no respect at all, and neither are his supporters.", ">>{luckykobold} : Your reasoning and grasp of the English language are decidedly, er, *different* somehow from other Americans. I think you've outed yourself. Time to retire this account and start up a new one."], [">>{JavascriptFanboy} : Islamic State says U.S. 'being run by an idiot'", '>>{cheapbutnotfree} : How dare this administration make me agree with ISIS.', '>>{JavascriptFanboy} : yeah my thoughts as well... I was like, will Trump and his administration unite every force in the world against them? It\'s like the plot in "The Watchmen", come to think of it.', '>>{HighHopesHobbit} : Well, you know that saying about murderous terrorist groups and stopped clocks...', ">>{llcooldre} : Isis won't attack us because trump is doing the work for them", '>>{emceenoesis} : We need to call stopped clocks what they are if we have any hope of defeating them.', '>>{FirstDimensionFilms} : Well they said that about Obama too. They are our enemies of course they are going to say that. Fuck ISIS though.', '>>{scaredog20} : Trump responded "I know you are but what am I."', '>>{qpzmwxom} : Can we not upvote what the Islamic State says?', ">>{LibTears4Lubricant} : > Can you get any more pathetic than this? Yes, you can be a liberal who parrots the talking points of a terrorist organization in an attempt to shame your own country's elected president. Embarrassing indeed.", ">>{conanthecnidarian} : I'm pretty sure everyone agrees with ISIS on this except Donald Trump and all of his children except Tiffany.", '>>{Swimwithamermaid} : I feel bad for you. Bot or not.', ">>{JavascriptFanboy} : that's the moral dilemma of this topic. You know it's right, you want to upvote it, but ... Islamic State.", ">>{shittyvonshittenheit} : So if ISIS says 2+2=4 i'm just parroting a terrorist talking point?", ">>{tundey_1} : Seriously though, what did Tiffany ever do to Trump? It's like if you are a daughter of his and he doesn't want to f**k you, you are nothing to him. If I was Jared, I'll watch my back while running these errands for Trump.", '>>{PM_ME_TRUMP_PISS_VID} : As opposed to parroting the talking points of a terrorist axis and supporting a coup. Also, shift change in Stalingrad.', '>>{gaeuvyen} : Temporal Gauge Extremists are a bane on the 4th dimension, we cannot let their evil ideology poison our short term gains!', ">>{gaeuvyen} : you mean the same liberals who have been calling Trump an idiot since the 80's roughly 30 years before ISIS existed? most people think Trump is a moron. If he wasn't born with a golden stick up his butt, he'd probably be homeless.", '>>{trump2020maga-} : r/politics supports terrorists over our president. shameful', ">>{sexy_mofo1} : Wow you *really wanted* this article to be seen. Can't say I'm all that surprised that a regular of ETS would have no qualms with giving the words of mass murdering rapists and terrorists as much exposure as you possibly could.", '>>{JavascriptFanboy} : I would say Trump did that for them but..oh wait, i said it. I find it particularly funny how even these rapists and murderers know that Trump is incompetent lel', '>>{nychuman} : This comment is such a great example of a straw man. Great job! Sad!', ">>{trtsmb} : Expert redditor with his 34 minute old account. He hasn't had time to develop reading comprehension skills or the ability to read at all.", '>>{trtsmb} : Unfortunately, they are correct that the US is being lead by a clueless idiot.'], ['>>{Um_Nope_Sorry} : On King day, Trump to meet with Martin Luther King III', ">>{Quinnjester} : You know what's sad many presidents wouldn't even do this cause they weren't freaking racists and had to prove a point.", ">>{notjabba} : I guess Trump meets with the son because all he knows is nepotism. If he wants to talk to the true intellectual heir of King's movement, he should talk to that John Lewis guy instead of insulting him on Twitter.", ">>{kanyefan125} : John Lewis is far from the heir of king's movement. King advocated for unity, peace and equality, you think you would see him calling the president illegitimate?", ">>{Um_Nope_Sorry} : The one who called him an illegitimate President? Personally, I think that's a great way for an intellectual to open a dialog. I distinctly remember Obama taking the time to reach out to the people that called him a Muslim interloper.", ">>{miltedmalkball} : The rub is that the secret Muslim sorry was a clear fabrication. We're still learning whether and to what extent Trump was legitimately elected.", '>>{DebussySIMiami} : Martin Luther King III looks like he ate Martin Luther Kings 1 & 2.', ">>{notjabba} : Trump is illegitimate based upon Comey and Putin's interference, which clearly put him over the edge in the electoral college despite his massive loss of the popular vote. Lewis made an excellent argument regarding the subject. Trump did not address his argument, instead using his standard method of insulting the messenger.", ">>{Um_Nope_Sorry} : So would Hillary have been illegitimate by virtue of Entertaining Tonight's leaked audio tapes?", '>>{notjabba} : It is despicable that modern day bigots attempt to claim King as one of their own. King was a radical and highly controversial in his day. He opposed people like Trump. His every word and action belied his opposition to the kind of ignorant nativism that is at the heart of Trumpism. At least MLK\'s opponents in his day had the decency to admit their opposition. I suspect that if King were alive today he would be standing beside John Lewis speaking out against Donald Trump. It is impossible to imagine him supporting the modern day Republican party, which stands forcefully against "unity, peace and equality."', '>>{kanyefan125} : I never said he would support Trump, just that if he opposed him, he would do so in a different way. My guess is he would be more similar to this civil rights leader, who was also marching in the movement with John Lewis, who is waiting to see what Trump does and would oppose him when necessary. This is a true image of unity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUNIAi9Xq5k', '>>{pikhq} : Did they allege she was a servant of Russia and Russian interests?', ">>{notjabba} : No, the two situations are not comparable. The Entertainment Tonight leak showed Trump for what he truly is. They were legitimately leaked by private parties far ahead of the election. Comey, on the other hand, made a statement days before the election that revealed no new information whatsoever. He used his public office to effect an election. It is completely different and not comparable. Putin's influence is also completely different and not comparable. And of course there is no Clinton equivalent to Trumps planned constitutional violations on day one of his presidency. He is accepting payment from foreign powers (read: cash bribes) at multiple businesses he owns. Any Senator who does not vote to impeach him is in dereliction of duty. In all fairness, I am not suggesting that Trump not be sworn in, there is no mechanism for preventing his ascent. But that is not the only meaning of illegitimate. He is illegitimate because Comey and Russia broke American law in delivering him the presidency and he himself will be in violation of the constitution on his first day in office.", '>>{celestialwaffle} : If Entertainment Tonight was a federal agency influenced by pro-Russian elements intending to sway the election from the get go, yes.', '>>{celestialwaffle} : You don\'t see the difference between "here\'s some evidence why this guy is a bad from a TV source" and selected and targeted leaking of info from a government source, true or not, to influence an election on behalf of a foreign government?', ">>{75962410687} : John Lewis is not the intellectual heir of King's movement by a longshot. I don't even know how you could pretend to make that statement with any seriousness.", ">>{RevolverRubberSoul} : There is not one single solitary piece of evidence that he was not legitimately elected yet a solid majority of the hypocritical left are calling the guy a Manchurian candidate. No it's not better than the he birther idiots and if you can't see how hypocritical liberals are right. Is then you are part of the partisan problem", '>>{RevolverRubberSoul} : I can "allege" you are a sexual predator and claim I have proof but it\'s classified. Look up the word allege next time and learn the difference between allegations and evidence', ">>{miltedmalkball} : IC disagrees with your assessment. I'm not a liberal so I don't particularly care if you find them hypocritical.", ">>{RevolverRubberSoul} : IC also led us into Iraq with no proof. IC fabricated the evidence way back around the Gulf of Tonkin. What's ironic about all of this is that in a free country you are supposed to question your government . The vast majority of liberals and their neo conservative friends refuse to do that now because they do not like the results of the presidential election. Why can't the IC release something that has proof behind it ? A letter is not proof . That would be like going into a courtroom and saying in a letter that a person committed a murder and that another person has the murder weapon but the court cannot see it because it's classified so just trust my letter . There is an unreasonable amount of classified information today.", '>>{miltedmalkball} : I agree we need more inquiry and more information. That is consistent with my comment above.', ">>{celestialwaffle} : If you're sincere about wanting an explanation, /u/notjabba just provided one better than I could ever do. Otherwise, um, nope, sorry.", '>>{Um_Nope_Sorry} : > Comey, on the other hand, made a statement days before the election that revealed no new information whatsoever. His statement did reveal new information though. He stated that they found additional e-mails pertinent to the investigation. Those e-mails happened to not have any damning information, but he made an announcement about an investigation being re-opened because an investigation into Hillary actually was being re-opened.', ">>{notjabba} : Please. He was a loyal Republican making statements to the news media that were carefully timed to hurt Clinton's campaign. There were various investigations into Trump going on at the same time but Comey followed FBI policy and kept quiet about those."], [">>{conanthecnidarian} : A lot of people are going to lose their insurance. And there's really no predicting how else Republicans will try to limit access considering they will have more power than they've had since Bush. >health departments are going to stop offering it. Health departments? What is a health department?", ">>{SaltHash} : >wtf? really? It's not like insurances aren't going to cover it and the health departments are going to stop offering it. From the article: > No-cost birth control has been a game-changer for women. WTF? Really? It is not hard to understand why women with low income will no longer have access to birth control they cannot afford. Also, it is not to hard to understand that repealing ObamaCare means those people will not have insurance. Additionally, low income jobs typically do not have insurance because the employers do not offer reasonably priced policies.", ">>{DC25NYC} : Don't worry since they'll likely make it harder to have abortions, im sure they'll ramp up teaching safe sex or at least increase welfare for those who have a child unprepared... It's not like they're just going to teach abstinence in certain states and cut welfare funding! s/", ">>{thesilvertongue} : I'm more worried about abortion. Wish I'm considering trying to stock up on those drugs.", ">>{onetoughmotherfucker} : I'm broke but if I wasn't I would buy as much Plan B as I could afford and give it out for free.", '>>{saturnengr0} : And expect planned parenthood to be shut down, thereby eliminating heath care access of millions of low income, rural women', '>>{onetoughmotherfucker} : Separation of church and state IDGAF about their religion. They can practice w/e nonsense they want. They *cannot* force those views on other people through legislation. And the comment I replied to said "it\'s not like they\'ll take birth control away"...when that\'s exactly what Hobby Lobby did to their employees.', ">>{another_sunnyday} : > the contraception mandate is not a law. It’s a rule put in place by HHS. And HHS, under a Trump White House, could change that rule without input from Congress. I coincidentally got an IUD before the election. It's one less thing to worry about, and will (hopefully) last longer than a Trump presidency", '>>{BeeLuv} : Donate to Planned Parenthood. Even $5 can make a huge difference. https://www.plannedparenthood.org/ Care. No matter what.', ">>{NotJohnMiller} : It is not the government's job to hand out free birth control. It is also not the government's job to fund abortions.", '>>{iamjacksprofile} : Why? Why not give something like food to the homeless or toys for children in need? Why plan b?', '>>{iamjacksprofile} : Toys For Tots or Feeding America is a much better cause this time of the year.', '>>{immakeeprunnin} : Women who want contraception: look into getting an IUD. Anyone who cares about this very real threat: donate to Planned Parenthood. If you have private insurance, make an appointment there so they can benefit from private funding (yes, even men can receive services!) Warn anyone you know about Crisis Pregnancy Centers that masquerade as legitimate health clinics and peddle false information about abortion under the guise of free speech. And write to your elected representatives to let them know your thoughts.', '>>{onetoughmotherfucker} : because my state will be the first to ban plan b when given the opportunity', ">>{NotJohnMiller} : It is not your right to have an abortion. If you want to go have sex and think there are no consequences, you're wrong.", '>>{immigrantpatriot} : Who died & put you in charge of where people donate their money?', ">>{berrieh} : > It is not the government's job to hand out free birth control. Free/subsidized birth control saves the government more money than it costs. http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2012/03/06/148042609/how-birth-control-saves-taxpayers-money I would say it is the government's job to protect its own fiscal interests and that of society's.", '>>{NotJohnMiller} : So you believe it is the job of the taxpayer to pay for people to have protected sex?', '>>{breadandfaxes} : So, the pharmaceutical companies win again, right? Fuck republicans.', '>>{berrieh} : Studies show the taxpayer experiences a financial benefit (it costs *less*) for these policies, so that question makes literally no sense in the context of the discussion.', ">>{solarbrigadier} : No. He said it's the government's job to promote the best outcome for society. You are arguing that the action is what is morally important, effects are irrelevant. He's arguing the effects of the action are what's morally important, how you got there isn't important. Deontology vs Utilitarianism.", '>>{Gisneurh} : If he gives out plan b that will make fewer children in need.', ">>{Gisneurh} : How come it's okay to pay for men to have sex? At least BC is used for more than pregnancy prevention. Tax dollars pay for Viagra and that's literally paying old men to have sex.", ">>{QwertyHutJr} : Texas already has the highest mother mortality rate of the entire first world, lack of women's health resources are killing many who don't need to die. Mothers shouldn't be dying in childbirth like it's fucking 1820.", '>>{QwertyHutJr} : Toys vs. Healthcare. Oh yeah, toys are way more important /s', ">>{onetoughmotherfucker} : > Mothers shouldn't be dying in childbirth like it's fucking 1820. Our legislators are salivating at the idea of going back to 1820 :/", '>>{NotJohnMiller} : What it boils down to is that the taypayers are paying for people to prevent babies, no matter what way of prevention "costs less". This seems morally wrong to me. If you don\'t want a baby, don\'t have sex. It\'s that simple. Taxpayers shouldn\'t have to flip the bill just because some people want to fuck without consequences.', ">>{iamjacksprofile} : I think giving toys to needy children at Christmas is a more worthy cause than having a stranger approach women on the street and handing out free fuck pills from your Plan B surplus. That's some creeper shit right there.", ">>{iamjacksprofile} : Approaching women and offering them free anti contraceptive pills from your Plan B supply is creepy, donating to Toys For Tots isn't. I don't think people really think these things through.", '>>{NotJohnMiller} : I agree with you. Government money should not be used to pay for men to get Viagra either. This is why I am against government-controlled healthcare.', '>>{Ed_Tivrusky_IV} : So what can they do for men? Genuinely curious. Going to google it now. **Edit** [Here you go, for anyone wondering.](https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/men)', ">>{papanico180} : I'm sure that simple solution will work out great! Good thinkin.", ">>{berrieh} : I mean, even if you look at sex as immoral or sinful, which your worldview requires (otherwise, you're just supporting healthcare), tax payers shouldn't have to foot the bill to prevent crime (because crime shouldn't be happening) or fight wars against global instability (because terrorism shouldn't be happening and countries shouldn't be fighting wars), but I live in the real world where sex is going to be had and we can simply make it less expensive to society as a whole. No one is a loser here -- taxpayers pay less, people get the healthcare they want and need, and people get to enjoy a healthy sex life without massive consequences to themselves or society. We pay to prevent crime, we pay to prevent terrorism... why is paying to prevent unwelcome babies that exacerbate socio-economic problems a step too far for anyone, especially when unlike the other policies, this one more than pays for itself and is a **financial** benefit/win for taxpayers when you look at the net effects?", '>>{knee-of-justice} : Lol he never said he was going to do that?', '>>{pervocracy} : >If you don\'t want a baby, don\'t have sex. Even married people? Shit. That\'s pretty harsh. (I mean, it\'s equally harsh for single people, but the whole "don\'t have sex if you can\'t accept the consequences" always seems to imply that all sex is young people casually hooking up. Not, say, longterm couples who have two children but don\'t want a third.)', '>>{WednesdaySloth} : Why not? Sex is an awesome, healthy activity, and I have no problem paying for protection if people want to have consensual sex.', ">>{Samseaster} : Yup. I am writing this while lying in the fetal position from getting a five year iud put in today. I made the call to my doctor the day after trump was elected. I don't want trump or pence making any decisions about my body.", '>>{berrieh} : Uh, no one suggested handing out Plan B pills to strangers, certainly Planned Parenthood is not going to do that with donations... Someone upthread did mention giving Plan B out to *people who need it*, presumably upon request, and as something he/she could not afford to actually do. Certainly the person never said they wanted to walk around the street handing it out... But either way, this is about donating to Planned Parenthood.', '>>{nliausacmmv} : >It is not your right to have an abortion. The US Supreme Court would seem to disagree with that statement.']]

classify and reply

[">>{Jaredocobo} : Friendly Business Inquiry. Yeesh. I think she's an IT person or something.", ">>{Wondercockactivate} : Good im glad it keeps getting posted. Majority rules this sub and we choose to point out that Hillary is about to stain the legacy of the first female president and history by trying to win despite a criminal investigation by the FBI. She's full of firsts. Also full of shit.", ">>{basedOp} : Oh man got to love this image in the face of today's FBI interview. https://www.hillaryclinton.com/ \\#He's with her!", '>>{2ballsnawinky} : You picked Obama so please pick me -hilary 2016', '>>{sedgwickian} : Who needs due process? The FBI has never investigated an innocent person!', ">>{ZeOppositeOfProgress} : [This is the first time I've seen this posted on this sub](http://i.imgur.com/Z4FvUZj.png)", '>>{Jaredocobo} : I tried to make a poorly phrased joke but yes.', ">>{luis_correa} : Unless it's positive toward Hillary. Then it gets lumped into a megathread and then deleted.", ">>{luis_correa} : Why won't the lamestream media talk about this?!", '>>{luis_correa} : Keep up the good work. Have an upvoted against the tide!', '>>{soalone34} : He failed making a link and it was a huge blob of random text']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{Jaredocobo} : Friendly Business Inquiry. Yeesh. I think she's an IT person or something.", ">>{Wondercockactivate} : Good im glad it keeps getting posted. Majority rules this sub and we choose to point out that Hillary is about to stain the legacy of the first female president and history by trying to win despite a criminal investigation by the FBI. She's full of firsts. Also full of shit.", ">>{basedOp} : Oh man got to love this image in the face of today's FBI interview. https://www.hillaryclinton.com/ \\#He's with her!", '>>{2ballsnawinky} : You picked Obama so please pick me -hilary 2016', '>>{sedgwickian} : Who needs due process? The FBI has never investigated an innocent person!', ">>{ZeOppositeOfProgress} : [This is the first time I've seen this posted on this sub](http://i.imgur.com/Z4FvUZj.png)", '>>{Jaredocobo} : I tried to make a poorly phrased joke but yes.', ">>{luis_correa} : Unless it's positive toward Hillary. Then it gets lumped into a megathread and then deleted.", ">>{luis_correa} : Why won't the lamestream media talk about this?!", '>>{luis_correa} : Keep up the good work. Have an upvoted against the tide!', '>>{soalone34} : He failed making a link and it was a huge blob of random text']]

classify and reply

[">>{spinserrr} : Well I meant he would stay on for anything CSS related in the future, sorry if that wasn't clear. These were his last words... Rip lil Dude U finna rest in iphone heavan on god 🔥😭💯💯", '>>{DragonPup} : > "Our decision to launch a generic alternative to EpiPen is an extraordinary commercial response to the idea of burning me at the stake," Bresch said on Monday. Fixed for truth.', '>>{Prak903} : RIP. What a great guy, helped out a lot on the sub.', ">>{sodypop} : My heart breaks for bmeckel's friends and family. He was an online friend to myself and many others as we were all getting started on this site. He made such a profound impact to so many people and communities and his presence is dearly missed.", ">>{AchievementUnlockd} : u/Bmeckel was a pillar of this subreddit and of reddit as a whole. I know that the founders and staff join me in mourning his passing. From my own personal view as a former Wikimedia/Wikipedia staffer, I think I can also speak to the fact that their staff and editing community will mourn his loss as well. We're thinking of all of you, and this subreddit (and all those on which he participated) as you move forward. Philippe Beaudette Director of Community, reddit", '>>{ubix} : Or the massive loss to our stockholders due to our executive greed.', '>>{DONNIE_THE_PISSHEAD} : 87-year-old Holocaust survivor powerfully warns Trump admin: “History is not on your side”', '>>{SchlangeHatRecht} : A generic needs to within 30% of brand name. Watch for their pens purporting to have standard .3mg to really have .2mg. Not that the cost to them is much, but just to be the thorough a-holes they are.', ">>{redtaboo} : bmeckel was one of the first people I met and got to know on reddit. He was a large part of my reddit life and I'm truly going to miss him and reddit is a worse place for this loss.", '>>{123celestekent321} : They did this to prevent some other company from doing it and losing control of the market niche.', '>>{SchlangeHatRecht} : No, the drug potency. Not the cost.', ">>{probablyuntrue} : Trump's a 70 year old obese man who loves fast food, time ain't on his side either", ">>{annoyingstranger} : Half of the original's new price. Still triple the price of a 2008 EpiPen.", '>>{ZeToast} : A monumental member. May he be remembered fondly and rest easy.', '>>{probablyuntrue} : shit I meant Trump, I think people misread my comment', ">>{AgentSmith27} : This is getting a little out of hand. Deporting illegal immigrants is not even close to being on the same level as mass executions. This is like Godwin's law hitting politics on a National level.", ">>{its_not_herpes} : I loved his constant jokes and enthusiasm, and I'll always crack up reading those mod mail threads where he called /u/DoTheDew mr papa john. he'll be greatly missed", '>>{DoTheDew} : >where he called /u/dothedew Papa John He never really let that go.', ">>{redroguetech} : Don't look, but the invisible hand of the market is fist raping our ass.", '>>{ubix} : Or so they could gouge our health care system, since they just got institutions to agree to stock the Epipen a few months ago.', '>>{louiegumba} : so the generic is still triple what the cost of the regular one was a year ago? This is a good thing?', ">>{Scithmal} : Very very saddening. I really wish him the best of luck. And it's very sad to have to say goodbye to him.", ">>{DoTheDew} : Man, even though I first heard this news about a week ago, you've got me tearing up again. I'll certainly miss all of his totally unnecessary use of caps lock in modmail, and him constantly calling me Papa John. Nice write up /r/TheRedditPope. Thanks for doing this. We'll miss you bmeckel.", '>>{deadication1221} : How did he dies? How old was he? Did he die happy, of natural diseases or some retarded shithead kill him?', '>>{louiegumba} : I made a post on this fact too. How is this even remotely a good thing. People are placated by this?', ">>{ceruleanskies001} : Because Hitler didn't start off killing people. That was the final solution. There's a dark road we could down as a nation that already has been traveled before. It's not wrong to be mindful of similarities.", '>>{toolish22} : Seems there was a reason why they raised a price on the epipen, so they could charge for the "generic" what they were charging for the real one.', '>>{adams551} : Nah, the drug itself is probably less than a penny per pen. No reason to do that.', ">>{gangbang} : Best of luck? The man didn't get a new job, he died.", ">>{deadication1221} : I understand. I was being rather blunt, I'm sorry.", ">>{DeVinely} : So the same price as the name brand with the coupon. Meaning, it isn't any cheaper at all. Expect it to purposely work in a confusing way so people won't attempt to buy them.", '>>{DeVinely} : This mod bot needs to learn what politics are, because this is a huge political issue right now.', ">>{Bernerberry} : Did he compare them? Did he say they were the same? I'm pretty sure he's simply stating that separating groups of people, tearing mothers from children, and painting millions of people with a broad brush, is something that will always be on the wrong side of history.", '>>{Etab} : Crushed to hear this. Bmeckel was one of my first Reddit friends, and a genuinely awesome guy. He left Reddit a much better place than how he found it. We’ll miss you, friend.', ">>{Scithmal} : Sorry, didn't mean it in that way. I was referring to my religion, Christianity. Sorry I didn't write it clear enough for those who don't believe in the same as me.", ">>{insane08} : My condolences to his family and friends. I never had the opportunity to interact with him but based on this post I can tell he had a huge impact and grateful for his hand in launching /r/iPhone. He's been a staple here and his memory will go on as part of the sub. With that said I'd like to thank the whole Mod team too for all your work and all the sub members here reading this. Life's fragile, lets make the best out of it.", '>>{soupyhands} : Many people will remember bmeckel for his sense of humour. I was fortunate to get to know him and in addition to his ever present ability to lighten the situation he also possessed a deep wisdom and ability to treat people fairly and like a person, rather than as an account. I learned many things from him and will fondly remember bmeckel as a natural leader and a friend.', '>>{Stalin_2020} : We\'re going to take out their families! *thunderous applause* *proceeds to [bomb their families and random civilians](https://www.google.com/amp/www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/amp/trump-admin-ups-drone-strikes-tolerates-more-civilian-deaths-n733336)* **Oh but I\'m a stupid libcuck if I try to draw any parallels with Nazi Germany** Do we literally have to be inside the "showers" before Goodwin\'s law stops negating any comparisons?', '>>{JesusChristoo} : Rest in peace. While I did not know him, nor recognize him by /u/ name, he will be sorely missed.', '>>{The-Syldon} : It is a fact of life, that how people react when you die, is a measure of how you have lived. RIP', '>>{TheUncuckening} : TIL keeping your country safe and secure is literally nazi Germany. Ok.', ">>{sdavid04} : As a fan of r/Hawaii50, we lost Keo Woolford today and now him????? What's going on?? He will surely be missed. Rest In Peace.", ">>{animatedhockeyfan} : Rest in peace. I don't believe I interacted with him, but he was clearly beloved.", '>>{screenwriterjohn} : I voted for Hillary. I dont think Trump is a Nazi.', '>>{TheSaharaPalace} : Thank you for all your efforts to grow and maintain such great community, u/Bmeckel. It is an enjoyable community to so many.', ">>{jase} : Bmeckel was such a legend, he could tell you the world was on fire and still make you laugh in the process. Character and charisma would accompany his every word. I'm going to miss you so much champ. :(", '>>{AgentSmith27} : > Do we literally have to be inside the "showers" before Goodwin\'s law stops negating any comparisons? In regards to deportations, its just ridiculous. We are not the only country to deport people, and there are countries with far stricter border controls. When Donald Trump starts killing illegal immigrants, then we are out of the realm of Godwin\'s law. Until then, this is just fear mongering nonsense.', '>>{Trooper27} : Did not know him but sorry to hear this. Prayers for his family.', '>>{StikeragFar} : What a shame that anyone survived the horrors of the Holocaust to face a Trump presidency. If only things had worked out differently.', '>>{screenwriterjohn} : America can legally deport anyone we want and build a wall. Not nazism.', ">>{Stalin_2020} : People called Obama the deporter and chief, I had a problem with how many he deported, but most were because of recently committed crimes. Yes of course we deport people, all countries do. [But other countries look at shit like this and say wtf.](https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxnews.com/us/2017/03/28/lawyer-ice-agent-shot-unarmed-chicago-man-as-opened-door.amp.html) And now we're building and paying for a wall? Ridiculous. If Trump ups the ICE raids and deportations like he says he will we'll have private prisons full of brown people who just wanted a better life and didn't want to wait 20 years to get it. If you don't want to be called Nazis then, well, maybe there's a space you can go to? You know somewhere *safe*", '>>{jugenbund} : * shareblue * right side of history meme Just...', '>>{Lionel-Richie} : Not all were... You had nazi satellite parties all over Europe and US nazis. Jesus people.', ">>{sri745} : I recently joined this subreddit and didn't know him well or get to interact with him, but best of luck to his family & friends. RIP u/Bmeckel.", '>>{AgentSmith27} : >If you don\'t want to be called Nazis then, well, maybe there\'s a space you can go to? You know somewhere safe See, the problem here is that you are so absorbed in your own rhetoric that you think everyone who disagrees is your enemy. I think illegal immigration is a complicated problem (and yes, I do think its a *problem*), and I\'m not really a supporter of Trump. Yet, when you go to nonsensical extremes like calling Trump a "Nazi" you aren\'t going to be taken seriously outside an echo chamber. I think some of the biggest problems associated with immigration is that too many people are simply political cheerleaders. The Democratic and Republican party aren\'t concerned with the issue as much as they are concerned with how this will eventually sway the vote. There are real problems with absorbing 20 million illegal immigrants, but its easy to recognize most of the people just want a better life. When people start ignoring one side of the argument or the other, or use ridiculous hyperbole like "Trump is a Nazi", then they close themselves off to actual solutions.', '>>{Stalin_2020} : The problem is the immigration system not the "illegal people." People say "oh you should just do it legally" but people that do that are idiots who no matter what will most likely never set foot in this country. They\'re falling for the idea that this country still or ever takes in the tired sick poor and hungry instead of just the rich and mainly skilled. What you don\'t seem to understand is that there are very real race implications in deporting people of a certain race because let\'s face it they\'re not saying "send the Slovenians back." We\'re deporting veterans dude this isn\'t about the 20 million illegals, this is being done to spread fear intentionally because Trump knows he can\'t deport all of them so he\'s scaring them. No Trump doesn\'t live in the 1930s and wear Hugo Boss and he isn\'t gonna gas chamber people. But when you completely close off the idea that he might be a populist authoritarian with xenophobic tendencies, similar to Putin and Thatcher, because "Nazis aren\'t real outside of history textbooks" then you are the one closing yourself off from an argument. ICE is doing some awful shit right now *in my town* not to mention across the country and I don\'t care that they aren\'t National Socialist\'s they\'re doing awful shit. Not to mention the legitimizing of targeted killings of civilians that Trump recently authorized. It was bad enough with the drones under Obama but he wasn\'t like "killing the brown families is chill" Thatcher acted like a Nazi in some ways, so did Putin, now so does Trump. Them not wearing red armbands doesn\'t change that. Would you prefer I use Stalinist Russia or Francoist Spain as my comparison to authoritarians? You\'re whole hearted dismissal of any argument comparing a politician to an authoritarian isn\'t my problem. The solution from the right is nothing changes and illegals stay scared and working for pennies for companies.', ">>{ralala} : Not really. Unless you're willing to say we can detain anyone we want without probable cause in order to check their immigration status.", ">>{cat-litter} : I didn't know him personally. But I hope he enjoyed his life & didn't feel pain when he took his last breath :/ Rest In Peace buddy.", ">>{screenwriterjohn} : If you get picked up by the cops, the cops could report non-Americans to ICE. Even Trump is not driving around, picking up illegals. The Jewish Germans were legally Germans. Edit: Obama wasn't Hitler. Trump isn't Hitler. Hitler was Hitler. Stupid-ass people try to turn all people they don't like into Nazis.", '>>{ralala} : > America can legally deport anyone we want Look: this is the claim I was responding to. It is false. "America can legally deport anyone illegally in the country who has been legally detained by police for an unrelated reason" -- i.e., the new goal-posts you\'ve set-- is an entirely different claim. > Edit: Obama wasn\'t Hitler. Trump isn\'t Hitler. Hitler was Hitler. Stupid-ass people try to turn all people they don\'t like into Nazis. Lol did you just preemptively use Godwin\'s Law against your own argument? Never seen that one before...', '>>{willowgrain} : Or his constant yelling :( - we lost a good one', '>>{Raenerys} : Thank you, u/Bmeckel. This is one of my favorite subs. May you rest in peace.', '>>{acredmonds} : Never knew the guy but rest easy friend. 😫', ">>{HollandJim} : It's sad to read about a person's passing. Thank you, /r/bmeckel, for your kind care and service all these years..", ">>{HybridxReality} : I send my condolences to the people that new this person. It seems that he was well-known here on Reddit. I unfortunately never received the opportunity to talk to him, but I would've loved the chance to do so. RIP.", ">>{AWildSketchIsBurned} : Does it really come down to luck when trying to get into heaven? Genuine question, I'm not religious.", ">>{Scithmal} : Thanks for asking! Heaven is easily obtainable as long as you just genuinely accept that Jesus is the Christ's son and He is our savior.", ">>{ladfrombrad} : This just got linked in r/Android's backroom and while I might be a little late here - all of us send our condolences to their family and many friends such as yourself. <3", ">>{NuclearLunchDectcted} : I'm so sorry, I hope his family is able to grieve and find peace after his passing. Losing a loved one is always a terrible situation. :("]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{DragonPup} : > "Our decision to launch a generic alternative to EpiPen is an extraordinary commercial response to the idea of burning me at the stake," Bresch said on Monday. Fixed for truth.', '>>{ubix} : Or the massive loss to our stockholders due to our executive greed.', '>>{SchlangeHatRecht} : A generic needs to within 30% of brand name. Watch for their pens purporting to have standard .3mg to really have .2mg. Not that the cost to them is much, but just to be the thorough a-holes they are.', '>>{123celestekent321} : They did this to prevent some other company from doing it and losing control of the market niche.', '>>{SchlangeHatRecht} : No, the drug potency. Not the cost.', ">>{annoyingstranger} : Half of the original's new price. Still triple the price of a 2008 EpiPen.", ">>{redroguetech} : Don't look, but the invisible hand of the market is fist raping our ass.", '>>{ubix} : Or so they could gouge our health care system, since they just got institutions to agree to stock the Epipen a few months ago.', '>>{louiegumba} : so the generic is still triple what the cost of the regular one was a year ago? This is a good thing?', '>>{louiegumba} : I made a post on this fact too. How is this even remotely a good thing. People are placated by this?', '>>{toolish22} : Seems there was a reason why they raised a price on the epipen, so they could charge for the "generic" what they were charging for the real one.', '>>{adams551} : Nah, the drug itself is probably less than a penny per pen. No reason to do that.', ">>{DeVinely} : So the same price as the name brand with the coupon. Meaning, it isn't any cheaper at all. Expect it to purposely work in a confusing way so people won't attempt to buy them.", '>>{DeVinely} : This mod bot needs to learn what politics are, because this is a huge political issue right now.'], [">>{spinserrr} : Well I meant he would stay on for anything CSS related in the future, sorry if that wasn't clear. These were his last words... Rip lil Dude U finna rest in iphone heavan on god 🔥😭💯💯", '>>{Prak903} : RIP. What a great guy, helped out a lot on the sub.', ">>{sodypop} : My heart breaks for bmeckel's friends and family. He was an online friend to myself and many others as we were all getting started on this site. He made such a profound impact to so many people and communities and his presence is dearly missed.", ">>{AchievementUnlockd} : u/Bmeckel was a pillar of this subreddit and of reddit as a whole. I know that the founders and staff join me in mourning his passing. From my own personal view as a former Wikimedia/Wikipedia staffer, I think I can also speak to the fact that their staff and editing community will mourn his loss as well. We're thinking of all of you, and this subreddit (and all those on which he participated) as you move forward. Philippe Beaudette Director of Community, reddit", ">>{redtaboo} : bmeckel was one of the first people I met and got to know on reddit. He was a large part of my reddit life and I'm truly going to miss him and reddit is a worse place for this loss.", '>>{ZeToast} : A monumental member. May he be remembered fondly and rest easy.', ">>{its_not_herpes} : I loved his constant jokes and enthusiasm, and I'll always crack up reading those mod mail threads where he called /u/DoTheDew mr papa john. he'll be greatly missed", '>>{DoTheDew} : >where he called /u/dothedew Papa John He never really let that go.', ">>{Scithmal} : Very very saddening. I really wish him the best of luck. And it's very sad to have to say goodbye to him.", ">>{DoTheDew} : Man, even though I first heard this news about a week ago, you've got me tearing up again. I'll certainly miss all of his totally unnecessary use of caps lock in modmail, and him constantly calling me Papa John. Nice write up /r/TheRedditPope. Thanks for doing this. We'll miss you bmeckel.", '>>{deadication1221} : How did he dies? How old was he? Did he die happy, of natural diseases or some retarded shithead kill him?', ">>{gangbang} : Best of luck? The man didn't get a new job, he died.", ">>{deadication1221} : I understand. I was being rather blunt, I'm sorry.", '>>{Etab} : Crushed to hear this. Bmeckel was one of my first Reddit friends, and a genuinely awesome guy. He left Reddit a much better place than how he found it. We’ll miss you, friend.', ">>{Scithmal} : Sorry, didn't mean it in that way. I was referring to my religion, Christianity. Sorry I didn't write it clear enough for those who don't believe in the same as me.", ">>{insane08} : My condolences to his family and friends. I never had the opportunity to interact with him but based on this post I can tell he had a huge impact and grateful for his hand in launching /r/iPhone. He's been a staple here and his memory will go on as part of the sub. With that said I'd like to thank the whole Mod team too for all your work and all the sub members here reading this. Life's fragile, lets make the best out of it.", '>>{soupyhands} : Many people will remember bmeckel for his sense of humour. I was fortunate to get to know him and in addition to his ever present ability to lighten the situation he also possessed a deep wisdom and ability to treat people fairly and like a person, rather than as an account. I learned many things from him and will fondly remember bmeckel as a natural leader and a friend.', '>>{JesusChristoo} : Rest in peace. While I did not know him, nor recognize him by /u/ name, he will be sorely missed.', '>>{The-Syldon} : It is a fact of life, that how people react when you die, is a measure of how you have lived. RIP', ">>{sdavid04} : As a fan of r/Hawaii50, we lost Keo Woolford today and now him????? What's going on?? He will surely be missed. Rest In Peace.", ">>{animatedhockeyfan} : Rest in peace. I don't believe I interacted with him, but he was clearly beloved.", '>>{TheSaharaPalace} : Thank you for all your efforts to grow and maintain such great community, u/Bmeckel. It is an enjoyable community to so many.', ">>{jase} : Bmeckel was such a legend, he could tell you the world was on fire and still make you laugh in the process. Character and charisma would accompany his every word. I'm going to miss you so much champ. :(", '>>{Trooper27} : Did not know him but sorry to hear this. Prayers for his family.', ">>{sri745} : I recently joined this subreddit and didn't know him well or get to interact with him, but best of luck to his family & friends. RIP u/Bmeckel.", ">>{cat-litter} : I didn't know him personally. But I hope he enjoyed his life & didn't feel pain when he took his last breath :/ Rest In Peace buddy.", '>>{willowgrain} : Or his constant yelling :( - we lost a good one', '>>{Raenerys} : Thank you, u/Bmeckel. This is one of my favorite subs. May you rest in peace.', '>>{acredmonds} : Never knew the guy but rest easy friend. 😫', ">>{HollandJim} : It's sad to read about a person's passing. Thank you, /r/bmeckel, for your kind care and service all these years..", ">>{HybridxReality} : I send my condolences to the people that new this person. It seems that he was well-known here on Reddit. I unfortunately never received the opportunity to talk to him, but I would've loved the chance to do so. RIP.", ">>{AWildSketchIsBurned} : Does it really come down to luck when trying to get into heaven? Genuine question, I'm not religious.", ">>{Scithmal} : Thanks for asking! Heaven is easily obtainable as long as you just genuinely accept that Jesus is the Christ's son and He is our savior.", ">>{ladfrombrad} : This just got linked in r/Android's backroom and while I might be a little late here - all of us send our condolences to their family and many friends such as yourself. <3", ">>{NuclearLunchDectcted} : I'm so sorry, I hope his family is able to grieve and find peace after his passing. Losing a loved one is always a terrible situation. :("], ['>>{DONNIE_THE_PISSHEAD} : 87-year-old Holocaust survivor powerfully warns Trump admin: “History is not on your side”', ">>{probablyuntrue} : Trump's a 70 year old obese man who loves fast food, time ain't on his side either", '>>{probablyuntrue} : shit I meant Trump, I think people misread my comment', ">>{AgentSmith27} : This is getting a little out of hand. Deporting illegal immigrants is not even close to being on the same level as mass executions. This is like Godwin's law hitting politics on a National level.", ">>{ceruleanskies001} : Because Hitler didn't start off killing people. That was the final solution. There's a dark road we could down as a nation that already has been traveled before. It's not wrong to be mindful of similarities.", ">>{Bernerberry} : Did he compare them? Did he say they were the same? I'm pretty sure he's simply stating that separating groups of people, tearing mothers from children, and painting millions of people with a broad brush, is something that will always be on the wrong side of history.", '>>{Stalin_2020} : We\'re going to take out their families! *thunderous applause* *proceeds to [bomb their families and random civilians](https://www.google.com/amp/www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/amp/trump-admin-ups-drone-strikes-tolerates-more-civilian-deaths-n733336)* **Oh but I\'m a stupid libcuck if I try to draw any parallels with Nazi Germany** Do we literally have to be inside the "showers" before Goodwin\'s law stops negating any comparisons?', '>>{TheUncuckening} : TIL keeping your country safe and secure is literally nazi Germany. Ok.', '>>{screenwriterjohn} : I voted for Hillary. I dont think Trump is a Nazi.', '>>{AgentSmith27} : > Do we literally have to be inside the "showers" before Goodwin\'s law stops negating any comparisons? In regards to deportations, its just ridiculous. We are not the only country to deport people, and there are countries with far stricter border controls. When Donald Trump starts killing illegal immigrants, then we are out of the realm of Godwin\'s law. Until then, this is just fear mongering nonsense.', '>>{StikeragFar} : What a shame that anyone survived the horrors of the Holocaust to face a Trump presidency. If only things had worked out differently.', '>>{screenwriterjohn} : America can legally deport anyone we want and build a wall. Not nazism.', ">>{Stalin_2020} : People called Obama the deporter and chief, I had a problem with how many he deported, but most were because of recently committed crimes. Yes of course we deport people, all countries do. [But other countries look at shit like this and say wtf.](https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxnews.com/us/2017/03/28/lawyer-ice-agent-shot-unarmed-chicago-man-as-opened-door.amp.html) And now we're building and paying for a wall? Ridiculous. If Trump ups the ICE raids and deportations like he says he will we'll have private prisons full of brown people who just wanted a better life and didn't want to wait 20 years to get it. If you don't want to be called Nazis then, well, maybe there's a space you can go to? You know somewhere *safe*", '>>{jugenbund} : * shareblue * right side of history meme Just...', '>>{Lionel-Richie} : Not all were... You had nazi satellite parties all over Europe and US nazis. Jesus people.', '>>{AgentSmith27} : >If you don\'t want to be called Nazis then, well, maybe there\'s a space you can go to? You know somewhere safe See, the problem here is that you are so absorbed in your own rhetoric that you think everyone who disagrees is your enemy. I think illegal immigration is a complicated problem (and yes, I do think its a *problem*), and I\'m not really a supporter of Trump. Yet, when you go to nonsensical extremes like calling Trump a "Nazi" you aren\'t going to be taken seriously outside an echo chamber. I think some of the biggest problems associated with immigration is that too many people are simply political cheerleaders. The Democratic and Republican party aren\'t concerned with the issue as much as they are concerned with how this will eventually sway the vote. There are real problems with absorbing 20 million illegal immigrants, but its easy to recognize most of the people just want a better life. When people start ignoring one side of the argument or the other, or use ridiculous hyperbole like "Trump is a Nazi", then they close themselves off to actual solutions.', '>>{Stalin_2020} : The problem is the immigration system not the "illegal people." People say "oh you should just do it legally" but people that do that are idiots who no matter what will most likely never set foot in this country. They\'re falling for the idea that this country still or ever takes in the tired sick poor and hungry instead of just the rich and mainly skilled. What you don\'t seem to understand is that there are very real race implications in deporting people of a certain race because let\'s face it they\'re not saying "send the Slovenians back." We\'re deporting veterans dude this isn\'t about the 20 million illegals, this is being done to spread fear intentionally because Trump knows he can\'t deport all of them so he\'s scaring them. No Trump doesn\'t live in the 1930s and wear Hugo Boss and he isn\'t gonna gas chamber people. But when you completely close off the idea that he might be a populist authoritarian with xenophobic tendencies, similar to Putin and Thatcher, because "Nazis aren\'t real outside of history textbooks" then you are the one closing yourself off from an argument. ICE is doing some awful shit right now *in my town* not to mention across the country and I don\'t care that they aren\'t National Socialist\'s they\'re doing awful shit. Not to mention the legitimizing of targeted killings of civilians that Trump recently authorized. It was bad enough with the drones under Obama but he wasn\'t like "killing the brown families is chill" Thatcher acted like a Nazi in some ways, so did Putin, now so does Trump. Them not wearing red armbands doesn\'t change that. Would you prefer I use Stalinist Russia or Francoist Spain as my comparison to authoritarians? You\'re whole hearted dismissal of any argument comparing a politician to an authoritarian isn\'t my problem. The solution from the right is nothing changes and illegals stay scared and working for pennies for companies.', ">>{ralala} : Not really. Unless you're willing to say we can detain anyone we want without probable cause in order to check their immigration status.", ">>{screenwriterjohn} : If you get picked up by the cops, the cops could report non-Americans to ICE. Even Trump is not driving around, picking up illegals. The Jewish Germans were legally Germans. Edit: Obama wasn't Hitler. Trump isn't Hitler. Hitler was Hitler. Stupid-ass people try to turn all people they don't like into Nazis.", '>>{ralala} : > America can legally deport anyone we want Look: this is the claim I was responding to. It is false. "America can legally deport anyone illegally in the country who has been legally detained by police for an unrelated reason" -- i.e., the new goal-posts you\'ve set-- is an entirely different claim. > Edit: Obama wasn\'t Hitler. Trump isn\'t Hitler. Hitler was Hitler. Stupid-ass people try to turn all people they don\'t like into Nazis. Lol did you just preemptively use Godwin\'s Law against your own argument? Never seen that one before...']]

classify and reply

[">>{jasonzimmy} : Trump Says 'Deeply Troubled Women' Are 'Best In Bed' In 2004 Howard Stern Clip", '>>{billrariden} : Why Trump’s Immigration Order Is Legal and Constitutional', '>>{Deofol7} : Well.... He is not wrong. Just not something I would ever let myself be recorded saying if I had political aspirations. Not at all presidential.', ">>{tyler9090} : Guy ran on a platform of keeping muslims out of the country. Talking in circles about it not being a muslim ban doesn't reflect the reality of the situation", ">>{JacobCrim88} : > He didn't know he was going to run for office then!!! The_Donald", '>>{shrike71} : Oh. Something from [NRO?](http://i.imgur.com/xg1vNXo.gifv)', '>>{KatsThoughts} : Literally this is what happens when you have a presidential nominee that has regularly appeared on the Howard Stern show. Thanks, GOP.', ">>{Deofol7} : Maybe you shouldn't when you know you said things over the years on radio stations and on your reality TV show that might make you not palatable to a majority of the electorate", ">>{ramblingdinosaur} : If it is, then the courts will uphold it. Otherwise they'll shut it down. We've got a system for this.", ">>{TheInfamousMonk} : As someone who's dated strippers, Trump *is* on to something here.", '>>{RosneftTrump2020} : I think it\'s terrible orders, useless, and certainly motivated by his racist comments. But the decision does raise an important question of whether campaign speeches and interviews now can be used to interpret law. I think it should, but it certainly will get a bunch of "textualists" or "originalists" in a huff.', '>>{stupid-rando} : Why NRO might as well invite the Birchers back to beef up their readership.', '>>{stcwhirled} : Little tinfoil but you can imagine a situation where they know how unconstitutional it is but are pressing it despite knowing it\'ll never happen, for two reasons. 1) to say they were making due on campaign promises 2) provide them "told you so" cover if and when another Islamic terrorist attack occurs.', '>>{slapadastic} : dated Money for sex isn\'t really "dating."', ">>{RosneftTrump2020} : I think the injunction/stay is likely to be overturned. There isn't a precedent for using campaigns to interpret intention of laws. So the only hope is to overturn it on its own merits.", ">>{CEMN} : This was literally the argument Trump surrogate Scottie Nell Hughes [used as her first response to Pussygate:](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_ngEc41oXg&feature=youtu.be&t=45) 1. BENGHAZI 2. Unlike Hillary he hasn't been running for office his entire life!!", '>>{zippedi} : Whether or not he\'s "correct" here is missing the point. I do not want a president who reveals his sexual desires / sexually harasses women. And judging from polls, neither does the majority of America. He really has nobody to blame but himself for his downfall', '>>{voompanatos} : Constitutionality has not yet been litigated in any court. Only lawsuits have been filed and temporary restraining orders (TROs) requested. Both (partial) bans of Muslims were suspended by TROs pending further court proceedings. The standards for a TRO are quite different from deciding ultimate constitutionality on the merits.', '>>{duqit} : The crazy ones are the best in bed Basically a running joke among men for like decades. I think the problem is that while Stern cracks jokes, Trump tries to out do him. And then we find out the Trump is not really telling jokes, he\'s giving you insight into how he actually behaves with women. Trump is basically a sex addict - he has all the symptoms. It\'s only a matter of time before we get the "fucking on coke is the best"', ">>{wills_it_does_god} : Talking about a Muslim ban doesn't change the constitutionality of the written law. Letting this decision by the 9th stand, allows a precedent where a judge can base their decision on circumstances outside of constitutional law.", ">>{throwawayainteasy} : >But the decision does raise an important question of whether campaign speeches and interviews now can be used to interpret law. They've always been able to used to inform decisions. There's plenty of case law specific to Establishment Clause claims that intent surrounding an action is just as important as the actual wording used to justify the action itself. Despite what the right might want to push regarding this EO, considering intent is far from a new concept. And there's no imaginary barrier separating the intent you voiced as a candidate from when you actually hold office.", '>>{balmergrl} : Bill Clinton has also called into the show multiple times btw. Not as often as Donald but it is a fact.', '>>{KatsThoughts} : I bet this will have a serious impact on his presidential candidacy.', ">>{MrKPEdwards} : So, I would like to point out that trump held a reflection campaign event the day the Hawaii judgement came out. The way he addressed it sort of confirmed that the judge's assessment on the intent of the order was correct. Legally, I think this can be used to make the argument that the President's order was made to effect an unconstitutional end. Notoriously I think, intent arguments are difficult but I think a good case can be made because of the general hubris that the T admin demonstrate.", '>>{wills_it_does_god} : Source? Non citizens outside of our country are not protected by the 1A.', ">>{jokerZwild} : Those pesky judges with their law edumication and legalese knowhow and all don't hold a candle to a website.", '>>{throwawayainteasy} : >Source? For intent applying to Establishment Clause claims? Larson, 456 U.S. at 254–55 held that a facially neutral statute violated the Establishment Clause in light of legislative history demonstrating an intent to apply regulations only to minority religions Village of Arlington Heights v. Metro. explained that circumstantial evidence of intent may be considered in evaluating whether a governmental action was motivated by a discriminatory purpose. In McCreary Cty. v. Am. Civil Liberties Union of Ky. Held that "historical context and ‘the specific sequence of events leading up to’ the adoption of a challenged policy are relevant considerations." >Non citizens outside of our country are not protected by the 1A. The Establishment Clause applies to all government actions. Even if it didn\'t, the plaintiffs in the lawsuit have established standing and demonstrated harm, so their claims against the EO are still in regards to the Establishment Clause. Incidentally, many Constitutional rights apply to non-citizens. SCOTUS has even ruled that non citizens not on US territory are due habeus corpus rights. What, is your stance that the government can totally endorse and establish religions anywhere it wants outside of US jurisdiction and that\'s a legitimate exercise of government power? Because that\'s what you\'re supporting if you claim the First Amendment only applies to US government interactions with US citizens.', ">>{p1um5mu991er} : Heh, poor Howard...he doesn't even know what to think about all of these mentions. I'm sure he doesn't want people to shy away from interviews in the future, but no one's forced to talk about anything on the show if they don't want to. They know what the show's all about", ">>{balmergrl} : Most people don't know Howard is a squeamish and awkward germaphobe in his private life, which he is very open about on the show. For example, even when John and Rebecca Stamos wanted to swap with him and Beth, Howard chickened out. Being so open about his own uptight weirdnesses and genuinely curious about freaks of all kinds are what often lures guests into revealing much more about themselves than they would to other interviewers.", '>>{PM_ME_ANYTHING_FUN} : I dont care who he fvcks. I just want my country back to pre-9/11', '>>{Stavello34} : I have heard that talked about, did they really try to swap huh?', '>>{omeow} : >I dont care who he fvcks. I just want my country back to pre-9/11 Exactly when? Before the 19th, when duelling was ok, when Trump took a gant loss, when Clinton was president?', ">>{jonathanmaxberman} : I'm not even sure what to call this logical fallacy? Ad sponsum tu quoque? Why do trump supporters act like he's running?", '>>{omeow} : >Just not something I would ever let myself be recorded saying if I had political aspirations. Not at all presidential. It is not about him saying inappropriate things long time ago. It is him bragging about it or his non-apology apologies. It shows given a chance he would be happy to repeat them.', ">>{balmergrl} : As a long time fan of Howard's interviews, I was just correcting the record that his guests cover a spectrum. For instance, Jewel (self identified feminist) did a great interview with him too. He demands honesty from his guests, unlike the majority of media. Anyway. After listening for decades, I canceled Sirius when he went on AGT and turned the programming over to Baba dumdum, so no idea how he's been covering the election. But he trolled American Idol results in 2007 http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/idol-worship/americas-got-talent-howard-stern-american-idol-348746", '>>{omeow} : Pre 9/11 is a span of time not a single point of time..... You understand that.', ">>{StickNoob117} : Is it wrong for me to agree? I've had one ex who was bat shit insane and amazing in bed and then a few girlfriends who where average at best in bed but perfectly sane mentally.", ">>{USA_ALPHA_MALE} : It's true though. This is relatable. I like him more now.", ">>{iamsorry88} : >I dont care who he fvcks. I just want my country back to pre-9/11 I want my country to overcome 9/11 and to become better than it's ever been, for all of it's citizens.", '>>{balmergrl} : It was discussed in detail on the show, yes. The only thing Howard hid for a while is that he had a minor nose job, but he eventually fessed up to that too - and not because he was pressed, they did a bit where everyone on the show revealed a secret.', '>>{escalation} : There is an intensity that frequently comes with batshit crazy, something dangerous and reckless that is hard to match by a relatively normal person.', ">>{Stavello34} : Yeah I know Howard is a germphobe, been a listener for like 20 years. Never heard them say they actually almost swapped though I remember hearing about this event. Prolly didn't want Stamos banging Beth which is understandable.", '>>{LD_in_MT} : * a person with whom one has a social or romantic engagement. synonyms: partner, **escort**, girlfriend, boyfriend, steady;', '>>{mapoftasmania} : Actually, these days the running joke is "Don\'t put your dick in crazy" but maybe it\'s the other way for old guys.', ">>{slapadastic} : ...and that's how you find yourself sitting down to supper with mom, dad, and an escort from Craigslist."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{jasonzimmy} : Trump Says 'Deeply Troubled Women' Are 'Best In Bed' In 2004 Howard Stern Clip", '>>{Deofol7} : Well.... He is not wrong. Just not something I would ever let myself be recorded saying if I had political aspirations. Not at all presidential.', ">>{JacobCrim88} : > He didn't know he was going to run for office then!!! The_Donald", '>>{KatsThoughts} : Literally this is what happens when you have a presidential nominee that has regularly appeared on the Howard Stern show. Thanks, GOP.', ">>{Deofol7} : Maybe you shouldn't when you know you said things over the years on radio stations and on your reality TV show that might make you not palatable to a majority of the electorate", ">>{TheInfamousMonk} : As someone who's dated strippers, Trump *is* on to something here.", '>>{slapadastic} : dated Money for sex isn\'t really "dating."', ">>{CEMN} : This was literally the argument Trump surrogate Scottie Nell Hughes [used as her first response to Pussygate:](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_ngEc41oXg&feature=youtu.be&t=45) 1. BENGHAZI 2. Unlike Hillary he hasn't been running for office his entire life!!", '>>{zippedi} : Whether or not he\'s "correct" here is missing the point. I do not want a president who reveals his sexual desires / sexually harasses women. And judging from polls, neither does the majority of America. He really has nobody to blame but himself for his downfall', '>>{duqit} : The crazy ones are the best in bed Basically a running joke among men for like decades. I think the problem is that while Stern cracks jokes, Trump tries to out do him. And then we find out the Trump is not really telling jokes, he\'s giving you insight into how he actually behaves with women. Trump is basically a sex addict - he has all the symptoms. It\'s only a matter of time before we get the "fucking on coke is the best"', '>>{balmergrl} : Bill Clinton has also called into the show multiple times btw. Not as often as Donald but it is a fact.', '>>{KatsThoughts} : I bet this will have a serious impact on his presidential candidacy.', ">>{p1um5mu991er} : Heh, poor Howard...he doesn't even know what to think about all of these mentions. I'm sure he doesn't want people to shy away from interviews in the future, but no one's forced to talk about anything on the show if they don't want to. They know what the show's all about", ">>{balmergrl} : Most people don't know Howard is a squeamish and awkward germaphobe in his private life, which he is very open about on the show. For example, even when John and Rebecca Stamos wanted to swap with him and Beth, Howard chickened out. Being so open about his own uptight weirdnesses and genuinely curious about freaks of all kinds are what often lures guests into revealing much more about themselves than they would to other interviewers.", '>>{PM_ME_ANYTHING_FUN} : I dont care who he fvcks. I just want my country back to pre-9/11', '>>{Stavello34} : I have heard that talked about, did they really try to swap huh?', '>>{omeow} : >I dont care who he fvcks. I just want my country back to pre-9/11 Exactly when? Before the 19th, when duelling was ok, when Trump took a gant loss, when Clinton was president?', ">>{jonathanmaxberman} : I'm not even sure what to call this logical fallacy? Ad sponsum tu quoque? Why do trump supporters act like he's running?", '>>{omeow} : >Just not something I would ever let myself be recorded saying if I had political aspirations. Not at all presidential. It is not about him saying inappropriate things long time ago. It is him bragging about it or his non-apology apologies. It shows given a chance he would be happy to repeat them.', ">>{balmergrl} : As a long time fan of Howard's interviews, I was just correcting the record that his guests cover a spectrum. For instance, Jewel (self identified feminist) did a great interview with him too. He demands honesty from his guests, unlike the majority of media. Anyway. After listening for decades, I canceled Sirius when he went on AGT and turned the programming over to Baba dumdum, so no idea how he's been covering the election. But he trolled American Idol results in 2007 http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/idol-worship/americas-got-talent-howard-stern-american-idol-348746", '>>{omeow} : Pre 9/11 is a span of time not a single point of time..... You understand that.', ">>{StickNoob117} : Is it wrong for me to agree? I've had one ex who was bat shit insane and amazing in bed and then a few girlfriends who where average at best in bed but perfectly sane mentally.", ">>{USA_ALPHA_MALE} : It's true though. This is relatable. I like him more now.", ">>{iamsorry88} : >I dont care who he fvcks. I just want my country back to pre-9/11 I want my country to overcome 9/11 and to become better than it's ever been, for all of it's citizens.", '>>{balmergrl} : It was discussed in detail on the show, yes. The only thing Howard hid for a while is that he had a minor nose job, but he eventually fessed up to that too - and not because he was pressed, they did a bit where everyone on the show revealed a secret.', '>>{escalation} : There is an intensity that frequently comes with batshit crazy, something dangerous and reckless that is hard to match by a relatively normal person.', ">>{Stavello34} : Yeah I know Howard is a germphobe, been a listener for like 20 years. Never heard them say they actually almost swapped though I remember hearing about this event. Prolly didn't want Stamos banging Beth which is understandable.", '>>{LD_in_MT} : * a person with whom one has a social or romantic engagement. synonyms: partner, **escort**, girlfriend, boyfriend, steady;', '>>{mapoftasmania} : Actually, these days the running joke is "Don\'t put your dick in crazy" but maybe it\'s the other way for old guys.', ">>{slapadastic} : ...and that's how you find yourself sitting down to supper with mom, dad, and an escort from Craigslist."], ['>>{billrariden} : Why Trump’s Immigration Order Is Legal and Constitutional', ">>{tyler9090} : Guy ran on a platform of keeping muslims out of the country. Talking in circles about it not being a muslim ban doesn't reflect the reality of the situation", '>>{shrike71} : Oh. Something from [NRO?](http://i.imgur.com/xg1vNXo.gifv)', ">>{ramblingdinosaur} : If it is, then the courts will uphold it. Otherwise they'll shut it down. We've got a system for this.", '>>{RosneftTrump2020} : I think it\'s terrible orders, useless, and certainly motivated by his racist comments. But the decision does raise an important question of whether campaign speeches and interviews now can be used to interpret law. I think it should, but it certainly will get a bunch of "textualists" or "originalists" in a huff.', '>>{stupid-rando} : Why NRO might as well invite the Birchers back to beef up their readership.', '>>{stcwhirled} : Little tinfoil but you can imagine a situation where they know how unconstitutional it is but are pressing it despite knowing it\'ll never happen, for two reasons. 1) to say they were making due on campaign promises 2) provide them "told you so" cover if and when another Islamic terrorist attack occurs.', ">>{RosneftTrump2020} : I think the injunction/stay is likely to be overturned. There isn't a precedent for using campaigns to interpret intention of laws. So the only hope is to overturn it on its own merits.", '>>{voompanatos} : Constitutionality has not yet been litigated in any court. Only lawsuits have been filed and temporary restraining orders (TROs) requested. Both (partial) bans of Muslims were suspended by TROs pending further court proceedings. The standards for a TRO are quite different from deciding ultimate constitutionality on the merits.', ">>{wills_it_does_god} : Talking about a Muslim ban doesn't change the constitutionality of the written law. Letting this decision by the 9th stand, allows a precedent where a judge can base their decision on circumstances outside of constitutional law.", ">>{throwawayainteasy} : >But the decision does raise an important question of whether campaign speeches and interviews now can be used to interpret law. They've always been able to used to inform decisions. There's plenty of case law specific to Establishment Clause claims that intent surrounding an action is just as important as the actual wording used to justify the action itself. Despite what the right might want to push regarding this EO, considering intent is far from a new concept. And there's no imaginary barrier separating the intent you voiced as a candidate from when you actually hold office.", ">>{MrKPEdwards} : So, I would like to point out that trump held a reflection campaign event the day the Hawaii judgement came out. The way he addressed it sort of confirmed that the judge's assessment on the intent of the order was correct. Legally, I think this can be used to make the argument that the President's order was made to effect an unconstitutional end. Notoriously I think, intent arguments are difficult but I think a good case can be made because of the general hubris that the T admin demonstrate.", '>>{wills_it_does_god} : Source? Non citizens outside of our country are not protected by the 1A.', ">>{jokerZwild} : Those pesky judges with their law edumication and legalese knowhow and all don't hold a candle to a website.", '>>{throwawayainteasy} : >Source? For intent applying to Establishment Clause claims? Larson, 456 U.S. at 254–55 held that a facially neutral statute violated the Establishment Clause in light of legislative history demonstrating an intent to apply regulations only to minority religions Village of Arlington Heights v. Metro. explained that circumstantial evidence of intent may be considered in evaluating whether a governmental action was motivated by a discriminatory purpose. In McCreary Cty. v. Am. Civil Liberties Union of Ky. Held that "historical context and ‘the specific sequence of events leading up to’ the adoption of a challenged policy are relevant considerations." >Non citizens outside of our country are not protected by the 1A. The Establishment Clause applies to all government actions. Even if it didn\'t, the plaintiffs in the lawsuit have established standing and demonstrated harm, so their claims against the EO are still in regards to the Establishment Clause. Incidentally, many Constitutional rights apply to non-citizens. SCOTUS has even ruled that non citizens not on US territory are due habeus corpus rights. What, is your stance that the government can totally endorse and establish religions anywhere it wants outside of US jurisdiction and that\'s a legitimate exercise of government power? Because that\'s what you\'re supporting if you claim the First Amendment only applies to US government interactions with US citizens.']]

classify and reply

['>>{JZcgQR2N} : Why FBI director James B. Comey was able to defy Justice bosses on Clinton email announcement', '>>{Andylikecat} : If I were you, I prefer to wait the 7s in September. I am using an iPhone 6s, not bad, but just like that.', '>>{gu4po} : Video of mom punishing son, 8, over school Trump vote leads to investigation', ">>{drakeb55} : Top Missouri official: If we tell Trump his dad loved him, he won't 'act out'", '>>{JZcgQR2N} : > Before becoming FBI director, Comey was famously involved in another confrontation with high-ranking government officials. In 2004, he tangled with White House counsel Alberto Gonzales and Andrew H. Card Jr., President George W. Bush’s chief of staff, in the hospital room of then-Attorney General John D. Ashcroft. Ashcroft was recovering from emergency surgery to remove his gallbladder, and **Gonzales and Card wanted to reauthorize a controversial warrantless domestic eavesdropping program**. > Comey was acting attorney general while Ashcroft was in the hospital, and **he had refused to extend the program**. Comey rushed to George Washington University Medical Center when he heard that **White House officials were going around him and trying to get the ill Ashcroft to sign off on the extension**. When he explained to Ashcroft what was happening, Ashcroft sided with him.', ">>{Trumpbart} : Yeah, I remember that. That still doesn't excuse him from dropping a jalapeno/crack laced nothing burger(known facts) into the mix eleven days out.", ">>{FullClockworkOddessy} : Maybe the entire country shouldn't have to try and solve the President's daddy issues.", ">>{Na7eY} : That's my boi Kander, now run in 2020 dammit!", ">>{RicoSuave1881} : This should make it to the front page. Downvoting this would just seem wrong Edit: wow. Downvotes for simply saying that people should see this. It doesn't matter who you supported, doing this to a child is not the way to react", ">>{NebraskaGunOwner} : I feel like Clinton's team are poking at the hornet's nest by going after Comey. It's clear he was put into an impossible position after previously testifying in front of congress. Unfortunately it also seems that Bill Clinton boarding Lynch's plane without permission which forced her to recuse herself has put a lot of this in motion.", ">>{GrumpyBearBank} : It's fucked up, but it really isn't politics.", ">>{PugiPugiPugi43} : I'm sure that when Michelle is asleep, the president is secretly getting off to pictures of Donalds dad/s", ">>{JZcgQR2N} : The article didn't seem to be trying to defend him in the current fiasco, I'm not sure what compelled you to make that comment.", ">>{thelazyreader2015} : Trump says he will 'absolutely do safe zones' in Syria", '>>{CyberIndustrialist} : Not if the Russians have anything to say on the matter.', ">>{FullClockworkOddessy} : As an actual gay person I wouldn't fuck Vladdy Putin's Puppet Pal if his asshole cured cancer. I wouldn't piss down his throat if his lungs were on fire. Trump is easily in the running for being the ugliest man on earth. Get with the fucking program. Now Obama or Biden on the other hand? Please God yes. Obama was one of my first crushes, and Joe seems like the sort of person who knows how to treat a lover right.", '>>{Ballsawoodmaster} : Sounds like she was doing some parenting, I know the leftist pussies in this world are all afraid of being an actual parent, but this is what it looks like.', '>>{sandernista_4_TRUMP} : Yeah that was disgusting to read; besides we all know that Biden prefers playing dominoes on cheese than on pasta.', '>>{JZcgQR2N} : > Unfortunately it also seems that Bill Clinton boarding Lynch\'s plane without permission It\'s sad that we\'re expected to believe Clinton was "just" visiting an old friend when we had politicians literally going to hospitals of coworkers in ill health trying to get them to sign off on a controversial bill.', '>>{fortean} : I agree. No reason to upgrade right now unless you have a lot of disposable income. If you do, go for the 7. The 6s has the exact same hardware as your se, for all intents and purposes.', ">>{fluffyfluffyheadd} : >Unfortunately it also seems that Bill Clinton boarding Lynch's plane without permission which forced her to recuse herself has put a lot of this in motion. Could you expand on this thought please?", '>>{Maculate} : There are some hints in their usage of the term nothing burger. The key is in this image: http://therightscoop.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/david-brock.jpg', ">>{SchwarzerKaffee} : Does that mean that he'll give them all guns like he wants to do in schools?", ">>{DALIDB} : Definitely a 7. If you can't wait until 10th iPhone comes out.", '>>{gottapaythetrolltol} : Life lessons are hard. Send his ass to the salt mines! (Or timeout whichever is closer)', ">>{jonsnowme} : He's speaking with Putin on Saturday. We'll see.", '>>{Zukeyknee} : God damn. Put "nothing-burger" right next to "Obama coalition" of phrases I cannot wait to never hear again after this election.', ">>{kiramis} : Clinton 2016 - technically not illegal/you can't prove anything! That's the kind of person I want to be president.", '>>{band_in_DC} : There are 300 million ppl in the US. One video of one person does not show any social trends.', ">>{AnAppleSnail} : >The lack of self-awareness... A requirement of this subreddit is that all posts be related to US politics. I guess we could start a gofundme for the guy's degree.", '>>{preserved_fish} : But will there be videos of puppers and other soft things?', '>>{diogorilho} : doenst worth the upgrade, already have a 7 and it´s full of bugs, I´ve bought the SE instead, 6S is a little big for me and it´s more 200€ ..it s to much money,Iphone SE is the best iphone ever', '>>{AnAppleSnail} : I hear about this "madlad" thing but have to admit at being out to sea on the reference.', ">>{majnus} : Why definitely? I think they're almost exact same phones (minus the water resistance and missing jack). If anyone is considering 6s vs the 7 - go with 6S.", ">>{GunOfSod} : Yeah, it's not as if these idiots are rioting in the streets or anything.", '>>{Prizm0000} : A safe zone. For who? The country has emptied out for the most part.', ">>{Yo_2T} : If you really wanna go for a 6s I'd suggest trying to buy it used or at the lowest price possible so in September you can sell it and not shell out too much cash for the 7s.", ">>{SocialistNixon} : We're gonna have the safest zones, the Syrians will complain we don't want to be so safe they will be so safe.", '>>{Almighty_Hobo} : He is a super star here in Missouri and he came close to beating Blunt this last election cycle. Hopefully he continues to stay involved in politics.', '>>{Morchaint} : It is curious that you rail on someone for making "David Brock talking points" in one comment, but then constantly make PizzaGate references in others.', '>>{foolmanchoo} : Leave it to a Trumpeteer to be a homophobe.', ">>{DALIDB} : I know that iPhone 7 won't change your daily usage but for the future and compatibility I'd suggest the 7 over 6S, water resistance is not a primary thing in iPhones cause no body is gonna put his personal iPhone in water just to test it's resistance, camera is a little bit better they added a new layer to improve colors & depth effects and performance wise the 7 is more powerful than a 6S but as i said it's not going to change your daily usage. So the wisest choice is a 6S, i said 7 because money difference is £100 which is not a big difference so i'll still say 7 is better than 6S at this time if he can't wait for next iPhone.", ">>{username12746} : I actually would love to see this happen, but it would be outrageously expensive and extremely difficult to pull off both diplomatically and logistically. It would require thousands more troops on the ground in Syria, likely American troops. And it's kind of hilarious that Trump is promoting this since he's pushed an isolationist line for so long. Make up your mind, Donny: are we interested in helping out other countries or not?", '>>{itsallcauchy} : Exactly the kind of informed discourse I come to /r/politics for......', '>>{sandernista_4_TRUMP} : Well if you look several more pages in my post history, you will see that I believe that pizzagate is a polemical response to the conspiracy theories that that a [professional slanderer like David Brock](http://i.imgur.com/Y4s8r7a.jpg) have been peddling for decades. The difference of course is that pizzagate is free memes whereas David Brock actually is paid to smear other people. Pizzagate will go away when Brock is banned from politics, I guarantee it.', '>>{LeftMarketAnarchist} : Ridiculous, ironic though that the right wing pretends to care though. Seems like they are adopting the faux outrage tendencies of extremist SJWs.', ">>{SOY_REINDEER_GRANDE} : Somebody's asking for a bitchy Trump tweet! You're going down, Missouri...", ">>{justablur} : Sorry, sir, our shit's broke. We told you we needed money for maintenance, not new shit five years from now. - Joint Chiefs", ">>{majnus} : That's why i recommend 6s over the 7, because 7 features are insignificant. Better camera...Maybe slightly. Don't even get me started on performance. Have you ever put 6S next to the 7 and actually tested the performance side by side? No? I did, because I have both at home. Lo and behold, the 6S running iOS 9 is MUCH more faster than the 7. I mean, literally twice-as-fast-boot-up faster. I do realize 7 is better hardware but in reality it means nothing. You won't see any difference whatsoever. 7 is actually one of the most disappointing iphones ever made. By no means I'm not saying it's a bad device, it's just disappointing. IPhone 6s is as powerful and comes with well optimised and nicely designed ios. Apple fucked up releasing a device that brings nothing new, additionally on an ios with poor UI that's not optimised at all and just wastes all the power the 7 has. The only reason I ended up with the 7 is black color which I love and 128GB which I love even more. Other than that, I would never recommend this phone over the 6S, ever.", '>>{MELSU} : Everyone who read your comment is now slightly dumber. You could have just said "MUH AUX PORT!" And it would have made more sense than the drivel you just leaked lol.', ">>{band_in_DC} : This mom isn't. She did not go out to protest at all. Wtf you on?", ">>{RicoSuave1881} : It's directly based off of voting for someone, that's part of politics.", ">>{AmbivalentFanatic} : I thought that one of the reasons the peace-loving Trump supporters wanted him to win was because of their objections to Hillary's proposed no-fly zones over Syria, which likely would have led to tension between Russia and the US. How is this any different, in theory and in practice?", ">>{varemia} : He's been talking about safe zones in Syria for ages. This isn't even news at this point, just nobody cared till now for some reason.", '>>{Ballsawoodmaster} : She did the right thing. Kids need to learn life lessons sometimes. Hopefully he will be more informed the next time he casts his vote.', '>>{NorcalHPDE} : With a safe zone Russia still gets to fly their jets to protect their ally.', '>>{Aldebaran135} : Investigation about a satirical video, what an excellent use of police resources. An article about an investigation about a satirical video, what an excellent use of "journalistic" resources.', '>>{Morchaint} : Come on. "Free memes." Just putting everything else aside. You are purposefully turning a blind eye when arguing that there aren\'t some paid agents (be it Russian intelligence, political operatives, or just people profiting off of false news) behind the major conspiracy theories from this election. If you want to make the case for fighting fire with fire, by all means. But the suggestion that these conspiracies are some organic phenomena from a movement is being disingenuous.', '>>{timefornewacctkids} : No trolling, just real talk, every single post.', '>>{WallOfSleep56} : Why not investigate? This is a form of psychological torture as far as we can see. But how long was he let out? Was he left unattended for a long period of time? Has it effected his health?', ">>{Aldebaran135} : It's not real. The person that reported this is not very smart and is causing the police to waste time and funds.", '>>{PavelDatsyuk} : > Better camera...Maybe slightly. OIS on the 7 makes it a bit more than slightly for me.', ">>{AnAppleSnail} : >It's the Missouri Secretary of State tweeting negatively about the behavior of the President-Elect. That's related. The mayor of Chicago talking about a hate crime wasn't politics. Why is this?", ">>{waste-of-skin} : If your satire involves tormenting a child you're not being satirical, you're being cruel.", '>>{SopranosAce} : You can only do whatever you want when you are famous. So you are right', '>>{AnAppleSnail} : >When was that? I\'ve seen like fifty articles about the hate crime in here. Late. I was reading about it in /news,/realnews,/showerthoughts, amd of course the real front page of Reddit. Meanwhile, mods here were repeatedly deleting it. The reasoning is words to the effect of: "Politically motivated attacks are not explicitly political news. These should be about running the US government, private political actions (demonstrations, lobbying, fundraising, and organizing movements)." while hate crimes have political undertones, they are not inherently political and thus are off topic." Kind of a "you had to be here seeing it suppressed live" thing.', ">>{another_sunnyday} : Honestly, I was hoping the writers on *America* weren't going to go for a Trump-goes-to-a-therapist subplot. It was done to death after *The Sopranos*.", '>>{thx1138jr} : Not to change to subject, but has anyone read if or what type of press coverage there will be of this visit? I mean he could easily have said this is the list that I am allowing to cover this, right?', ">>{CoolBreezeBrother} : Is this question satire? Assuming no, because we'd be cooperating with Russia and Assad on the aligned goal of establishing safe zones, not funding the opposition that's doing the beheading. Pretty fucking simple", '>>{waste-of-skin} : You misheard. Conservatives want the right to *eat* their kids, not to beat them.', '>>{CarlosFromPhilly} : That kid sounds like me on Wednesday morning... -_-', ">>{gapost} : Isn't it only the 7 Plus that has OIS? And I'll add that I used the SE for a while and got tired of the smaller screen. The 6S is very nice and the battery is almost the same as the SE, for me. The 3D touch is great. Haven't used the 7.", '>>{PavelDatsyuk} : No, the regular 7 has OIS. The regular 6s does not while the 6S plus does. The 7 has the same camera as the 7 plus minus the second one on the back.', ">>{paleo_bear} : Wow, you really like buying iPhones. Just wait! Your phone is less than a year old. You're probably going to want to get the iPhone 8 or whatever they call it when it comes out this fall.", ">>{CoolBreezeBrother} : The safe zones are for the people fleeing who we're funding", '>>{waste-of-skin} : Yeah! How dare this shitty kid express himself and believe in free will?', ">>{hillarysidiot} : So, we'd have to lie to him? Fred never loved Donnie. I can feel some empathy for Donnie, but seeing who he is, I really can't blame his Dad too much, I mean he is pretty unlovable.", ">>{nerveonya} : The kid's 8, I don't think he voted for Trump, Rico.", '>>{Tzcar} : If we put his degree from Wharton on the fridge will we be able to avoid nuclear war.', ">>{Aldebaran135} : The child is not really being tormented. It's fake. Those kids in Stranger Things aren't really being chased by an interdimensional monster either.", ">>{RicoSuave1881} : It was a mock school election and he voted for trump, I know he didn't actually vote, which makes this all the more horrible", ">>{AmbivalentFanatic} : Oh, I'm so glad someone smart showed up to explain this to me! Thanks oodles.", ">>{nerveonya} : Yeah so it's not really a story about politics, as much as it is a story about some crazy woman punishing her son for fake voting Trump", ">>{waste-of-skin} : If this is a joke the kid ain't in on it.", ">>{CoolBreezeBrother} : True. I remember the first time I heard him say it at a debate I thought it was a big deal. It's especially huge for Europe", '>>{Tzcar} : Honestly, its a badge of honor among Democrats to have Trump tweet something puerile at/about you.', ">>{AmbivalentFanatic} : I will! Thank you so much for the reminder. Thank God you're here.", '>>{MaiAyeNuhs} : The TrumpenFuhrer loves Comrade Putin no one can say otherwise or else', '>>{Almighty_Hobo} : Look up his senate picture and then search for Jack Nicholson joker smile. Its his doppelganger.', ">>{whatsinthesocks} : Don't forget that time a guy shot up the pizza place. How great are free memes right guys", ">>{LordoftheScheisse} : Kander had the best [political ad](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wqOApBLPio) this election cycle. Shame he couldn't edge out Blunt.", ">>{danester1} : I'm just so unbelievably pissed he won. The dude is the definition of establishment. People said the voted for change. ROY BLUNT DOESN'T REPRESENT THAT YOU FUCKING KNOBS!", '>>{ricdesi} : Fuck Donald Trump, his tiny hands, and his drunk, racist father. I have zero interest in coddling a spineless, orange Tantrum-Thrower in Chief.', ">>{Twojots} : There are many things it would be great if we didn't 'have' to do. Pooping, while fantastic, is a complete waste of time and I for one, never feel completely clean until I shower. But we do it anyway because it will be better than not doing it.", ">>{GDMFusername} : I don't know, it was kinda funny when my grandma put her coat to bed and told everyone not to wake it up.", '>>{Nomandate} : Savage. Unfortunately daddy was incapable of genuine love most likely.', ">>{RE5TE} : Or we could just tweet at him until he explodes. That's good for me.", ">>{ThiefOfDens} : Wake it up? You know it's not really asleep, just waiting 'til everyone leaves so it can jacket.", '>>{AnAppleSnail} : Akshually, suppressing a controversial topic for part of a news cycle is getting typical. A great example is that as soon as thr much-delayed identity of the Orlando shooter was released, hige swathes of comments and links were abolished.', ">>{crocojunk} : I'm not going to sugarcoat it but I hope noone does.", '>>{Twojots} : No doubt the novelty of people making fun of him will change his mind.', ">>{AssCalloway} : I'd love to hear a lot more about Fred and Donald.", ">>{TrappedLabRat} : >Democrat: If we tell Trump his dad loved him, he won't 'act out'", '>>{punbasedname} : It\'s pretty clear that "voting for change" was just code for "voting against Democrat nerds who care about things like science and public well-being more than they pretend to care about God and legitimately care about money." By those standards Blunt is exactly the kind of guy to keep around.', '>>{thejoshu} : People should just reply to all of his "unpresidented" tweets with clips of John Goodman in *The Big Lebowski* yelling "Shut the fuck up, Donny! You\'re out of your element!"', ">>{GDMFusername} : Hasn't gotten to [this point](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1PK4qYzNkI) yet."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{gu4po} : Video of mom punishing son, 8, over school Trump vote leads to investigation', ">>{RicoSuave1881} : This should make it to the front page. Downvoting this would just seem wrong Edit: wow. Downvotes for simply saying that people should see this. It doesn't matter who you supported, doing this to a child is not the way to react", ">>{GrumpyBearBank} : It's fucked up, but it really isn't politics.", '>>{Ballsawoodmaster} : Sounds like she was doing some parenting, I know the leftist pussies in this world are all afraid of being an actual parent, but this is what it looks like.', '>>{gottapaythetrolltol} : Life lessons are hard. Send his ass to the salt mines! (Or timeout whichever is closer)', '>>{band_in_DC} : There are 300 million ppl in the US. One video of one person does not show any social trends.', ">>{GunOfSod} : Yeah, it's not as if these idiots are rioting in the streets or anything.", '>>{LeftMarketAnarchist} : Ridiculous, ironic though that the right wing pretends to care though. Seems like they are adopting the faux outrage tendencies of extremist SJWs.', ">>{band_in_DC} : This mom isn't. She did not go out to protest at all. Wtf you on?", ">>{RicoSuave1881} : It's directly based off of voting for someone, that's part of politics.", '>>{Ballsawoodmaster} : She did the right thing. Kids need to learn life lessons sometimes. Hopefully he will be more informed the next time he casts his vote.', '>>{Aldebaran135} : Investigation about a satirical video, what an excellent use of police resources. An article about an investigation about a satirical video, what an excellent use of "journalistic" resources.', '>>{timefornewacctkids} : No trolling, just real talk, every single post.', '>>{WallOfSleep56} : Why not investigate? This is a form of psychological torture as far as we can see. But how long was he let out? Was he left unattended for a long period of time? Has it effected his health?', ">>{Aldebaran135} : It's not real. The person that reported this is not very smart and is causing the police to waste time and funds.", ">>{waste-of-skin} : If your satire involves tormenting a child you're not being satirical, you're being cruel.", '>>{SopranosAce} : You can only do whatever you want when you are famous. So you are right', '>>{waste-of-skin} : You misheard. Conservatives want the right to *eat* their kids, not to beat them.', '>>{CarlosFromPhilly} : That kid sounds like me on Wednesday morning... -_-', '>>{waste-of-skin} : Yeah! How dare this shitty kid express himself and believe in free will?', ">>{nerveonya} : The kid's 8, I don't think he voted for Trump, Rico.", ">>{Aldebaran135} : The child is not really being tormented. It's fake. Those kids in Stranger Things aren't really being chased by an interdimensional monster either.", ">>{RicoSuave1881} : It was a mock school election and he voted for trump, I know he didn't actually vote, which makes this all the more horrible", ">>{nerveonya} : Yeah so it's not really a story about politics, as much as it is a story about some crazy woman punishing her son for fake voting Trump", ">>{waste-of-skin} : If this is a joke the kid ain't in on it."], [">>{drakeb55} : Top Missouri official: If we tell Trump his dad loved him, he won't 'act out'", ">>{FullClockworkOddessy} : Maybe the entire country shouldn't have to try and solve the President's daddy issues.", ">>{Na7eY} : That's my boi Kander, now run in 2020 dammit!", ">>{PugiPugiPugi43} : I'm sure that when Michelle is asleep, the president is secretly getting off to pictures of Donalds dad/s", ">>{FullClockworkOddessy} : As an actual gay person I wouldn't fuck Vladdy Putin's Puppet Pal if his asshole cured cancer. I wouldn't piss down his throat if his lungs were on fire. Trump is easily in the running for being the ugliest man on earth. Get with the fucking program. Now Obama or Biden on the other hand? Please God yes. Obama was one of my first crushes, and Joe seems like the sort of person who knows how to treat a lover right.", '>>{sandernista_4_TRUMP} : Yeah that was disgusting to read; besides we all know that Biden prefers playing dominoes on cheese than on pasta.', ">>{AnAppleSnail} : >The lack of self-awareness... A requirement of this subreddit is that all posts be related to US politics. I guess we could start a gofundme for the guy's degree.", '>>{AnAppleSnail} : I hear about this "madlad" thing but have to admit at being out to sea on the reference.', '>>{Almighty_Hobo} : He is a super star here in Missouri and he came close to beating Blunt this last election cycle. Hopefully he continues to stay involved in politics.', '>>{Morchaint} : It is curious that you rail on someone for making "David Brock talking points" in one comment, but then constantly make PizzaGate references in others.', '>>{foolmanchoo} : Leave it to a Trumpeteer to be a homophobe.', '>>{itsallcauchy} : Exactly the kind of informed discourse I come to /r/politics for......', '>>{sandernista_4_TRUMP} : Well if you look several more pages in my post history, you will see that I believe that pizzagate is a polemical response to the conspiracy theories that that a [professional slanderer like David Brock](http://i.imgur.com/Y4s8r7a.jpg) have been peddling for decades. The difference of course is that pizzagate is free memes whereas David Brock actually is paid to smear other people. Pizzagate will go away when Brock is banned from politics, I guarantee it.', ">>{SOY_REINDEER_GRANDE} : Somebody's asking for a bitchy Trump tweet! You're going down, Missouri...", '>>{Morchaint} : Come on. "Free memes." Just putting everything else aside. You are purposefully turning a blind eye when arguing that there aren\'t some paid agents (be it Russian intelligence, political operatives, or just people profiting off of false news) behind the major conspiracy theories from this election. If you want to make the case for fighting fire with fire, by all means. But the suggestion that these conspiracies are some organic phenomena from a movement is being disingenuous.', ">>{AnAppleSnail} : >It's the Missouri Secretary of State tweeting negatively about the behavior of the President-Elect. That's related. The mayor of Chicago talking about a hate crime wasn't politics. Why is this?", '>>{AnAppleSnail} : >When was that? I\'ve seen like fifty articles about the hate crime in here. Late. I was reading about it in /news,/realnews,/showerthoughts, amd of course the real front page of Reddit. Meanwhile, mods here were repeatedly deleting it. The reasoning is words to the effect of: "Politically motivated attacks are not explicitly political news. These should be about running the US government, private political actions (demonstrations, lobbying, fundraising, and organizing movements)." while hate crimes have political undertones, they are not inherently political and thus are off topic." Kind of a "you had to be here seeing it suppressed live" thing.', ">>{another_sunnyday} : Honestly, I was hoping the writers on *America* weren't going to go for a Trump-goes-to-a-therapist subplot. It was done to death after *The Sopranos*.", ">>{hillarysidiot} : So, we'd have to lie to him? Fred never loved Donnie. I can feel some empathy for Donnie, but seeing who he is, I really can't blame his Dad too much, I mean he is pretty unlovable.", '>>{Tzcar} : If we put his degree from Wharton on the fridge will we be able to avoid nuclear war.', '>>{Tzcar} : Honestly, its a badge of honor among Democrats to have Trump tweet something puerile at/about you.', '>>{MaiAyeNuhs} : The TrumpenFuhrer loves Comrade Putin no one can say otherwise or else', '>>{Almighty_Hobo} : Look up his senate picture and then search for Jack Nicholson joker smile. Its his doppelganger.', ">>{whatsinthesocks} : Don't forget that time a guy shot up the pizza place. How great are free memes right guys", ">>{LordoftheScheisse} : Kander had the best [political ad](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wqOApBLPio) this election cycle. Shame he couldn't edge out Blunt.", ">>{danester1} : I'm just so unbelievably pissed he won. The dude is the definition of establishment. People said the voted for change. ROY BLUNT DOESN'T REPRESENT THAT YOU FUCKING KNOBS!", '>>{ricdesi} : Fuck Donald Trump, his tiny hands, and his drunk, racist father. I have zero interest in coddling a spineless, orange Tantrum-Thrower in Chief.', ">>{Twojots} : There are many things it would be great if we didn't 'have' to do. Pooping, while fantastic, is a complete waste of time and I for one, never feel completely clean until I shower. But we do it anyway because it will be better than not doing it.", ">>{GDMFusername} : I don't know, it was kinda funny when my grandma put her coat to bed and told everyone not to wake it up.", '>>{Nomandate} : Savage. Unfortunately daddy was incapable of genuine love most likely.', ">>{RE5TE} : Or we could just tweet at him until he explodes. That's good for me.", ">>{ThiefOfDens} : Wake it up? You know it's not really asleep, just waiting 'til everyone leaves so it can jacket.", '>>{AnAppleSnail} : Akshually, suppressing a controversial topic for part of a news cycle is getting typical. A great example is that as soon as thr much-delayed identity of the Orlando shooter was released, hige swathes of comments and links were abolished.', ">>{crocojunk} : I'm not going to sugarcoat it but I hope noone does.", '>>{Twojots} : No doubt the novelty of people making fun of him will change his mind.', ">>{AssCalloway} : I'd love to hear a lot more about Fred and Donald.", ">>{TrappedLabRat} : >Democrat: If we tell Trump his dad loved him, he won't 'act out'", '>>{punbasedname} : It\'s pretty clear that "voting for change" was just code for "voting against Democrat nerds who care about things like science and public well-being more than they pretend to care about God and legitimately care about money." By those standards Blunt is exactly the kind of guy to keep around.', '>>{thejoshu} : People should just reply to all of his "unpresidented" tweets with clips of John Goodman in *The Big Lebowski* yelling "Shut the fuck up, Donny! You\'re out of your element!"', ">>{GDMFusername} : Hasn't gotten to [this point](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1PK4qYzNkI) yet."], ['>>{Andylikecat} : If I were you, I prefer to wait the 7s in September. I am using an iPhone 6s, not bad, but just like that.', '>>{fortean} : I agree. No reason to upgrade right now unless you have a lot of disposable income. If you do, go for the 7. The 6s has the exact same hardware as your se, for all intents and purposes.', ">>{DALIDB} : Definitely a 7. If you can't wait until 10th iPhone comes out.", '>>{diogorilho} : doenst worth the upgrade, already have a 7 and it´s full of bugs, I´ve bought the SE instead, 6S is a little big for me and it´s more 200€ ..it s to much money,Iphone SE is the best iphone ever', ">>{majnus} : Why definitely? I think they're almost exact same phones (minus the water resistance and missing jack). If anyone is considering 6s vs the 7 - go with 6S.", ">>{Yo_2T} : If you really wanna go for a 6s I'd suggest trying to buy it used or at the lowest price possible so in September you can sell it and not shell out too much cash for the 7s.", ">>{DALIDB} : I know that iPhone 7 won't change your daily usage but for the future and compatibility I'd suggest the 7 over 6S, water resistance is not a primary thing in iPhones cause no body is gonna put his personal iPhone in water just to test it's resistance, camera is a little bit better they added a new layer to improve colors & depth effects and performance wise the 7 is more powerful than a 6S but as i said it's not going to change your daily usage. So the wisest choice is a 6S, i said 7 because money difference is £100 which is not a big difference so i'll still say 7 is better than 6S at this time if he can't wait for next iPhone.", ">>{majnus} : That's why i recommend 6s over the 7, because 7 features are insignificant. Better camera...Maybe slightly. Don't even get me started on performance. Have you ever put 6S next to the 7 and actually tested the performance side by side? No? I did, because I have both at home. Lo and behold, the 6S running iOS 9 is MUCH more faster than the 7. I mean, literally twice-as-fast-boot-up faster. I do realize 7 is better hardware but in reality it means nothing. You won't see any difference whatsoever. 7 is actually one of the most disappointing iphones ever made. By no means I'm not saying it's a bad device, it's just disappointing. IPhone 6s is as powerful and comes with well optimised and nicely designed ios. Apple fucked up releasing a device that brings nothing new, additionally on an ios with poor UI that's not optimised at all and just wastes all the power the 7 has. The only reason I ended up with the 7 is black color which I love and 128GB which I love even more. Other than that, I would never recommend this phone over the 6S, ever.", '>>{MELSU} : Everyone who read your comment is now slightly dumber. You could have just said "MUH AUX PORT!" And it would have made more sense than the drivel you just leaked lol.', '>>{PavelDatsyuk} : > Better camera...Maybe slightly. OIS on the 7 makes it a bit more than slightly for me.', ">>{gapost} : Isn't it only the 7 Plus that has OIS? And I'll add that I used the SE for a while and got tired of the smaller screen. The 6S is very nice and the battery is almost the same as the SE, for me. The 3D touch is great. Haven't used the 7.", '>>{PavelDatsyuk} : No, the regular 7 has OIS. The regular 6s does not while the 6S plus does. The 7 has the same camera as the 7 plus minus the second one on the back.', ">>{paleo_bear} : Wow, you really like buying iPhones. Just wait! Your phone is less than a year old. You're probably going to want to get the iPhone 8 or whatever they call it when it comes out this fall."], [">>{thelazyreader2015} : Trump says he will 'absolutely do safe zones' in Syria", '>>{CyberIndustrialist} : Not if the Russians have anything to say on the matter.', ">>{SchwarzerKaffee} : Does that mean that he'll give them all guns like he wants to do in schools?", ">>{jonsnowme} : He's speaking with Putin on Saturday. We'll see.", '>>{preserved_fish} : But will there be videos of puppers and other soft things?', '>>{Prizm0000} : A safe zone. For who? The country has emptied out for the most part.', ">>{SocialistNixon} : We're gonna have the safest zones, the Syrians will complain we don't want to be so safe they will be so safe.", ">>{username12746} : I actually would love to see this happen, but it would be outrageously expensive and extremely difficult to pull off both diplomatically and logistically. It would require thousands more troops on the ground in Syria, likely American troops. And it's kind of hilarious that Trump is promoting this since he's pushed an isolationist line for so long. Make up your mind, Donny: are we interested in helping out other countries or not?", ">>{justablur} : Sorry, sir, our shit's broke. We told you we needed money for maintenance, not new shit five years from now. - Joint Chiefs", ">>{AmbivalentFanatic} : I thought that one of the reasons the peace-loving Trump supporters wanted him to win was because of their objections to Hillary's proposed no-fly zones over Syria, which likely would have led to tension between Russia and the US. How is this any different, in theory and in practice?", ">>{varemia} : He's been talking about safe zones in Syria for ages. This isn't even news at this point, just nobody cared till now for some reason.", '>>{NorcalHPDE} : With a safe zone Russia still gets to fly their jets to protect their ally.', '>>{thx1138jr} : Not to change to subject, but has anyone read if or what type of press coverage there will be of this visit? I mean he could easily have said this is the list that I am allowing to cover this, right?', ">>{CoolBreezeBrother} : Is this question satire? Assuming no, because we'd be cooperating with Russia and Assad on the aligned goal of establishing safe zones, not funding the opposition that's doing the beheading. Pretty fucking simple", ">>{CoolBreezeBrother} : The safe zones are for the people fleeing who we're funding", ">>{AmbivalentFanatic} : Oh, I'm so glad someone smart showed up to explain this to me! Thanks oodles.", ">>{CoolBreezeBrother} : True. I remember the first time I heard him say it at a debate I thought it was a big deal. It's especially huge for Europe", ">>{AmbivalentFanatic} : I will! Thank you so much for the reminder. Thank God you're here."], ['>>{JZcgQR2N} : Why FBI director James B. Comey was able to defy Justice bosses on Clinton email announcement', '>>{JZcgQR2N} : > Before becoming FBI director, Comey was famously involved in another confrontation with high-ranking government officials. In 2004, he tangled with White House counsel Alberto Gonzales and Andrew H. Card Jr., President George W. Bush’s chief of staff, in the hospital room of then-Attorney General John D. Ashcroft. Ashcroft was recovering from emergency surgery to remove his gallbladder, and **Gonzales and Card wanted to reauthorize a controversial warrantless domestic eavesdropping program**. > Comey was acting attorney general while Ashcroft was in the hospital, and **he had refused to extend the program**. Comey rushed to George Washington University Medical Center when he heard that **White House officials were going around him and trying to get the ill Ashcroft to sign off on the extension**. When he explained to Ashcroft what was happening, Ashcroft sided with him.', ">>{Trumpbart} : Yeah, I remember that. That still doesn't excuse him from dropping a jalapeno/crack laced nothing burger(known facts) into the mix eleven days out.", ">>{NebraskaGunOwner} : I feel like Clinton's team are poking at the hornet's nest by going after Comey. It's clear he was put into an impossible position after previously testifying in front of congress. Unfortunately it also seems that Bill Clinton boarding Lynch's plane without permission which forced her to recuse herself has put a lot of this in motion.", ">>{JZcgQR2N} : The article didn't seem to be trying to defend him in the current fiasco, I'm not sure what compelled you to make that comment.", '>>{JZcgQR2N} : > Unfortunately it also seems that Bill Clinton boarding Lynch\'s plane without permission It\'s sad that we\'re expected to believe Clinton was "just" visiting an old friend when we had politicians literally going to hospitals of coworkers in ill health trying to get them to sign off on a controversial bill.', ">>{fluffyfluffyheadd} : >Unfortunately it also seems that Bill Clinton boarding Lynch's plane without permission which forced her to recuse herself has put a lot of this in motion. Could you expand on this thought please?", '>>{Maculate} : There are some hints in their usage of the term nothing burger. The key is in this image: http://therightscoop.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/david-brock.jpg', '>>{Zukeyknee} : God damn. Put "nothing-burger" right next to "Obama coalition" of phrases I cannot wait to never hear again after this election.', ">>{kiramis} : Clinton 2016 - technically not illegal/you can't prove anything! That's the kind of person I want to be president."]]

classify and reply

[">>{saucytryhard} : Meet Roger Stone: One of Donald Trump's most loyal supporters who is now being investigated by FBI", ">>{drive_me_away} : Opinion piece, doesn't at all reflect what I'm seeing on the streets.", '>>{HunterGreen} : Clinton Pulls Within 1 Point In Georgia In Latest Polls', ">>{congerbot} : He seemed pretty confident he didnt do anything on Bill Maher's show this weekend.", '>>{SKHRAEURPL} : Yes because half of america has putins dick in their ass and trumps down their throat.', '>>{jaCASTO} : I rather have them live in NC and FL and increase black + youth turnout there as opposed to trying to reach out any further to traditionally red areas.', '>>{spitfire9107} : You guy sthink there will ever be a laptop like nintendo switch. I always wanted a device that can replace my laptop/kindle/and smartphone. Surface pro was close to doing it because with SP4 I could replace my laptop and kindle but not my phone. I am thinkin ga device like SFP4 but that can be used as a phone. It could be like nintendo switch where I remove a part of it and its a phone to carry and when I get home I attach that part so its a tablet/laptop again.', '>>{dwf1967} : Agreed. Not the time to be tilting at windmills. Play good defense and run out the clock.', '>>{RynheartTheReluctant} : >"It\'s rare that I\'m accused of something that I\'m not guilty of," Stone told the New Yorker in 2008. Now it\'s up to investigators to test that. _Such_ dumb. He\'s a caricature.', '>>{tank_trap} : Trump and his cronies need to all go to jail. The sooner, the better for the country.', ">>{balmergrl} : The article left out the fact Stone was given authority over BIA and Indian Gaming by Bush Jr, presumably as a thank you for his role to orchestrate the Brooks Bros riot http://www.villagevoice.com/news/a-dirty-tricksters-bush-bonanza-6407578 Also that he ran Al Sharpton's campaign (mostly out of his own pocket) to undermine DNC and Gary Johnson's campaign to take out Ron Paul. Fantastic collection of articles, once I started I couldn't stop https://italkyoubored.wordpress.com/2014/02/04/roger-stone-pretty-reckless-is-going-straight-to-hell-part-one/", ">>{HumanShadow} : >He's a caricature. Look at how he dressed. He'd give /r/justneckbeardthings a fucking aneurysm.", ">>{internationengineer} : I'm looking to replace my old home stereo amplifier with a surround sound system with 4+ hdmi inputs. It also should have a child proof feature that locks out the buttons on the front and just gives the remote the control. I'm looking to spend less than $400.", '>>{987f} : Disgusting media companies profiting off of a witch hunt.', '>>{PureBlooded} : Looking for a home projector (hopefully portable): - Something that allows 720-1080p video (4k is a bonus) - Something that is relatively aesthetic - Something that has the option to use external speakers (either via bluetooth or aux cable) - Something that can connect via USB/HDMI - Something can comes with a remote, or I can buy a remote for, or that can be controlled via an app - A decent brand', ">>{electrictrumpet} : I have always wanted a phone that had a super high quality camera on it, better than most cellphones. Something with glass optics, possibly a zoom lens? Doing a quick search the Samsung Galaxy S4 Zoom is pretty close to what I'm thinking of, although it is an older model. I met a guy who had a similar device from Panasonic. Asian model, big zoom lens, android powered. What modern android devices fit this form factor and are available unlocked (I use Verizon in the US)?", '>>{Trumpbart} : Yeah. GA is a reach and not worth it. NC is the place to plant Barack and Michelle.', ">>{shshao} : Swamp... It's taken in a whole new meaning...", ">>{DumpsterDon} : Thanks Comrade. We'll be ok. In the meantime, it's pretty fun nit picking every little and big fuck up Dumpster manages to get himself into.", '>>{HumptyMcDumpty} : the GA chapter of the Sweet Potato Queens need to be voting their conscience about now.', ">>{Engage_Physically} : I need some help installing Netflix onto my Samsung Smart TV please. I can't find it anywhere or where to download it.", '>>{drive_me_away} : Ah, I see. I thought they were supporting Trump because there were no jobs. Economic anxiety?', ">>{evilr2} : Asus already tried the Padfone where you dock the phone into a bigger screen and turn it into a tablet. I could see MS doing something like this in the future, possibly a Surface phone, that can dock into larger, Surface Pro type 2 in 1 with the phone being the brains. They're still working on making continuum a more PC like experience and this will be a much better experience in the future. The HP Elite X3 and the HP Lapdock combo looks cool, but its expensive and continuum and Win 10 mobile still need improvements to be a viable option for most people.", '>>{MortWellian} : He got his start doing dirty tricks under Nixon. The man has literally no shame.', ">>{DaWolverine} : Perhaps I'm a little insensitive about this but idk if chuck schumer tearing up at trumps EO was very smart. The democrats need to stand up to trump and the GOP by showing there strength not there sensitivity. Instead of tear up, get mad but also be professional. Most critics called out the incompetence of the EO, and that's what we should be doing, not crying about it. I'm not saying men and woman shouldn't ever cry, at times it is powerful but in this case I feel a more strong, measured response would've been more impactful.", ">>{buy_iphone_7} : Trump is doomed. If he loses Georgia he's done.", '>>{nmanl} : im glad under obama all of them were able to find all those jobs.', ">>{evilr2} : I would probably just go with a Samsung Galaxy S7 for a good all around camera. If you really do need something with optical zoom, then you can get a Moto Z from Verizon and purchase this camera add-on that attaches to the phone. It's not cheap though. https://www.verizonwireless.com/accessories/hasselblad-true-zoom-camera-mod-black/?cmp=CSE-C-HQ-NON-R-AC-NONE-ACC-2C0PX0-PX-PLA-89867N&cvosrc=cse.google.89867N&cvo_crid=110153009364", ">>{Macd7} : I voted for her here. That'd be so cool if she did", ">>{OfficerPlonks} : Does anyone remember when Alex Jones and Roger Stone invaded the TYT set at the RNC? One of the most unbelievable things I've ever seen", '>>{lazydictionary} : He did an AMA on this very subreddit which devolved into personal attacks between him and the users. Mods actually had to remove a lot of his comments (and others) because things were escalating so quickly (and rule-breaking). https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5rvt51/im_roger_stone_political_insider_and_longtime/ You can see all his removed comments on his userpage. He might have deleted some other ones.', '>>{CuntTheRouge} : I think there is a point to this. There is no strategy, and no clear message to focus and hammer on the contempt of court in Virginia, Bannon--the really top stuff.', '>>{hzumbru1} : Well the Moto z had a camera mod like that that you can slap on the back of it, and the z force the bigger battery, and shatter proof screen version is a Verizon exclusive.', ">>{Minerva7} : He didn't look very happy when he brought out that cake. Put it on the table and left immediately.", ">>{dudeguypal} : Dude has a fucking tattoo of Richard Nixon's face on his back.", '>>{Megaloman71} : Walking out to the mailbox in front of the trailer park to collect your welfare check isn\'t included in the labor department figures as a "job".', '>>{paid4this} : Poor Donnie fans. Are they going to have to schlong themselves? Are they going to schlong each other? This is going to get ugly!', '>>{troll_is_obvious} : As much as right-wingnuts like to piss and moan about Wa-Po bias, at least they allow differing opinion pieces. Can you imagine such a blatantly partisan but left leaning hack being given a forum at Breitbart?', '>>{jakejames} : Great looking documentary called *"Get Me Roger Stone"* out on Netflix, May 12th: https://youtu.be/5IPyv4KgTAA', ">>{tetsugo} : There is some Smartphone with an OLED screen that is not pentile? I don't perceive SO much difference between my 1080p LCD screen and some OLED screen with higher resolution (except for the contrast and the obvious advantage over LCD) and I believe that is because of the RGB matrix of LCD. I'm misleading myself on this? There is a Quad HD OLED with RGB subpixel matrix?", '>>{BudrickBundy} : I have a pretty good job but my home town is full of some of those decaying factories that litter our nation\'s landscape like tombstones that Trump talked about in his inauguration. And I\'m not even in the rust belt, which has been absolutely devastated. And that\'s not the only problem related to the status quo on "jobs" issues like immigration, trade, or taxes. Trump\'s election was necessary for a lot of reasons, "jobs" among them.!', '>>{ccrmalite} : Check out the latest episode of Real Time with Bill Maher. He was on it this Friday.', ">>{floridalegend} : More purple need to take action and very involved for anything is to happen. Outrage isn't enough.", '>>{Rayston} : Can anyone recommend a peephole door camera that meets the following requirements? Wi-Fi Color Output can be fed to cell phone (Android) and/or PC Motion activated with alerts to cell phone Time/date log Audio(Just preferred)', '>>{pushpin} : As another user asked in another thread: is it a witch hunt if you end up finding a witch?', '>>{sjwsrs} : because schumer is a giant pussy. and this is the guy leading dems in the senate? nobody at the helm of the dnc, and a washed up old hag leading dems in the house. no wonder dems have lost over a thousand state seats, 12 governorships, 10 senate seats, 50+ house seats...... christ, "babbling and discouraged" would be a high water mark for this crack squad of ne\'er-do-wells.', ">>{gotsafe} : The fact that you can say that about 10 battleground states isn't usually a good sign for your campaign", '>>{drive_me_away} : I hope that the economy continues to improve in those areas. I do believe it is very hard. I just don\'t think that particular argument ("Trump supporters have jobs! Liberals are protesting because they are unemployed bums!") is very honest. The number of people I saw say "Get a job!" online about the airport protests, for example, was eye-roll inducing. Those happened on a Saturday.', '>>{AllGoodMenDie} : Asus made a phone with x3 optical zoom https://www.asus.com/us/Phone/ZenFone-Zoom-ZX551ML/ Sony phones although expensive and not that great do have the best cameras on the market.', ">>{i-am-sancho} : I thought they didn't have jobs and that's why they voted for a man promising government would solve all their problems", '>>{isoundstrange} : Oh, you want to meet Roger Stone? [Here](https://youtu.be/lHbAsndSKXA?t=388) he is!', '>>{penguins2946} : in latest polls It was one poll, while two others show Trump up at 7 points and 9 points. Of the last 12 polls, only 2 of them show Clinton is within 1 point of Georgia. Most of them have Trump up comfortably 4-6%.', ">>{BIG__GREEN} : Yeah, it's interesting to see the Washington bubble elite perspective because in the facebook-and-pavement world it's a very different story.", ">>{DaWolverine} : I think the democrats don't understand that even hardcore liberals want leaders who can be strong and tough but also fight for progressive policies and advocate for progressive ideas. The democrats now think that they gotta be so sensitive and politically correct to cater to there base when unfortunately at this point it doesn't even seem they have a base There is the bernicrats The hardcore SJW liberals The moderate democrats The Reagan democrats And of corse u can't forget that u need independents And I'm sure the vast majority of these people not only want progressiveness but also a show of strength. Especially toward the current opposition that is the GOP", '>>{BudrickBundy} : Those guys really need to get jobs, lives whatever. The protests are idiotic.', ">>{AllGoodMenDie} : From what I can find their isn't a great peephole camera that does what you want but this doorbell camera seems to meet your requirements https://ring.com/", ">>{drive_me_away} : Well, thanks. I've been attending them, and I work.", ">>{scrappykitty} : I'm fine with Schumer. I wish Nancy would retire.", '>>{Rayston} : Thank you for the help. Little expensive for my tastes and I prefer something more open platform (but I did not put that in my requirements). Nonetheless It is probably going in my short list for this solution. Thank You!', ">>{BudrickBundy} : The [executive order](http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/25/text-trump-executive-order-on-enhancing-public-safety-in-interior-united-states.html) was a load of common sense except for the part that prohibited green card holders, which was quickly fixed. I actually listened to former Congressman Rob Simmons' take on it on a local radio program this morning and it was awesome. Too bad I can't find the audio!", '>>{KEVLAR60442} : Can someone recommend a 4K HDR TV without superfluous smart features? I have a Shield Console for that. Preferably 50 inches, give or take, and preferably less than 2000 dollars.', '>>{drive_me_away} : Aside from the fact that people who had visas and were on planes had already been vetted.', ">>{Super_Secret_SFW} : I want a cheap tablet, powerful enough to operate Moonlight over wifi and probably run Reddit is Fun. What's a good name to look at? Budget is highest of priority", ">>{penguins2946} : Maybe if you just listen to the echo chamber of this sub, you may think that Clinton actually has a chance in Georgia. In reality, it's more likely that Trump wins PA than Clinton wins Georgia according to 538. http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/georgia/ http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/pennsylvania/", '>>{Vanderpool_joel} : Alright guys i need help finding a camera system. My church is looking at installing cameras in our pre-school area that will allow parents to view their children during the church services. Obviously it would need to be app based that they could download on their phones. What do you all suggest? Also, they are looking at a live streaming service with which they will be able to stream the service as it happens in the preschool area so the workers will be able to view the service. Thanks for your help in advance!', '>>{TrollKong} : When 99% of mainstream media is anti-Trump, you need someone like Breitbart that is unabashedly pro-Trump.', '>>{paid4this} : Bet every cent you have on Donnie to win. Promise you will.', ">>{ChlkDstTtr} : You're right about that. Not that 538 is the end-all, but the chances are really slim in Georgia. Hillary fans will dream about GA and AZ, just as Trump fans will dream about PA and MI. NC and FL are too close for anyone's comfort. Regardless of your side it's going to be a lot closer than any of us would like.", '>>{PM_ME_STEAMGAMES_PLS} : Do you guys have any suggestions for a crank/pedal powered phone charger? Also, any good solar battery chargers out there? I have been told that those Chinese ones from ebay are really crappy even in a full sunny day.', '>>{lelbrahhh} : What is the best or popular SSD Storage out there? I need anything at least 500GB and with a high IOPS (INPUTS & OUTPUTS PER SECOND). Either that or anything best in your opinion. Be sure to tell me if its the best in your opinion, or popular. Thanks!', '>>{isoundstrange} : > More purple need to take action Exactly. Enough of the orange menace.', ">>{penguins2946} : A. Not a Trump supporter, I'm probably going to end up voting Clinton. B. How is that relevant to saying that Clinton isn't going to win Georgia? I mean, come on, Clinton supporters have become even more toxic on this sub than usual recently.", '>>{mf-TOM-HANK} : I noticed that, too. He walked away from that one-on-one with Bill very abruptly and looked like he had his tail between his legs when he brought the cake out.', '>>{Lord_Molyb} : President Obama was here (UNC) yesterday! There was quite a bit of interest among the other students so hopefully it ends up leading to a big turnout here.', ">>{xXVoicesXx} : I figure that this isn't a hot laptop to most, but it's a great update to the HP Stream series brought out two years ago, and slightly refreshed last year. Has anybody been able to find this for sale? I'm having the hardest time find it on HP's website, and when I look at other retailers online, I'm not sure if it's the old version because the picture doesn't seem to match what HP is advertising. [HP article](http://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-news/blog/mobile-computing/cloud-computing-experience.html) [Article](https://www.engadget.com/2016/08/10/hp-stream-14/) [HP splash page](http://store.hp.com/us/en/ContentView?storeId=10151&langId=-1&catalogId=10051&eSpotName=new-stream)", ">>{BudrickBundy} : The Trump Administration is not confident in the current vetting process and is also not confident that the countries on this list are doing their due diligence to make sure they aren't sending terrorists our way. That's the point of the order! A small number of people were inconvenienced.", ">>{baberim} : Have there been any rumblings about a new Logietch Harmony remote? Usually the new remote(s) release around this time of year (Oct 2015, July 2014, August 2013....) but I haven't heard anything.", '>>{SnapDeeTuck} : Roger Stone is on a big media push to sell his book, but MORE IMPORTANTLY to try to convince people of his innocence and Donald Trump\'s innocence when it comes to collusion with the Russians. He is the face of whataboutism. He is the face of "nothing to see here". He shouldn\'t be trusted. Not now, not ever.', ">>{oohhh} : I'd love to hear why you think the EO was a load of common sense.", ">>{Justtryme90} : McDonald's doesn't count, people who make real money don't support Trump.", '>>{SnapDeeTuck} : He was spewing his whataboutism and nothing to see here there, and anywhere else that will let him lately.', ">>{Justtryme90} : No, you need to get your head checked if you're pro Trump.", ">>{rtechie1} : Which one were you looking for? The first article talks about 4 different laptops, the HP Stream 11, Stream 14, Stream 11 Pro, and Stream X360. I'm not seeing the Stream 14 and Stream X360 on HP's website, but on Amazon. Some laptops are retailer-exclusive.", '>>{marcus_man_22} : to be fair, TYT handled that very badly as well', ">>{penguins2946} : At this point, really the only contested states will be Florida, North Carolina, Nevada and New Hampshire (3 most recent polls are a tie, +5 for Trump and +1 for Trump). I think the rest are pretty clearly in the bag for each candidate. Clinton's problem is that if Trump wins those 4 states, the electoral college will be tied at 269.", '>>{orlanderlv} : Did you see his hands during Bill Maher? The top half (top of palm up towards his fingers) of his hands were painted with that horrible bronzing tanner he uses. It looked like he had been back stage constantly wiping the sweat from his brow and the brown had stained his hands.', '>>{paid4this} : > How is that relevant to saying that Clinton isn\'t going to win Georgia? What is wrong with you? Have you suffered a stroke? Here is my comment, the one you are referring to: "Poor Donnie fans. Are they going to have to schlong themselves? Are they going to schlong each other? This is going to get ugly!" ??? Please do us all a favor and take a few days off, don\'t use this sub, just do something else. Just be quiet.', ">>{ChlkDstTtr} : Which causes a whole different mess. Let's hope the election is decisive so we don't have several more weeks of heartburn.", ">>{ChlkDstTtr} : Also, I'd be surprised if he bagged all four, but it's not out of the question.", '>>{penguins2946} : Well you\'re certainly supporting my "Clinton supporters are toxic on this sub" theory, that\'s for sure. You were responding to an article about Georgia being close to "Poor Donnie fans", to which I responded with this poll is just an outlier and he\'s going to win Georgia. There\'s really no reason to think this election will get ugly for Trump in the next 5 days, so it sounded like you were using this poll as justification for that.', ">>{rtechie1} : Assuming an unlimited budget (you didn't specify), something like the [Samsung 950 Pro PCIe NVMe drive](https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-950-PRO-Internal-MZ-V5P512BW/dp/B01639694M/). NVMe is essentially the future of storage. (Source: I'm a engineer who works in Dell's Storage Test Labs.)", '>>{txyesboy} : Almost as idiotic as the belief that "jobs" that no longer exist in this country are coming back. Spoiler Alert: many of these jobs literally went away, period - not overseas; just went away. You simply cannot bring back jobs that no longer exist.', '>>{penguins2946} : I\'d be surprised for him to get all 4 too, but I could definitely see him getting North Carolina, Florida and Nevada. That would get this election to be very close and Trump will just fuel the "this election is rigged!!!" nonstop if that does happen. That\'s why I\'m concerned with this, Trump doesn\'t have a legitimate argument for the election being rigged if the EC count is like 370 to 170.', '>>{Risley} : at this point, yes. We need NC to stay in our column and frankly she should stop going to all these other random ass states. Stick to the firewall and ensure that that is secure. Its too close now.', ">>{Risley} : umm, Trump's team has been doing the same shit about other heavily Hillary favored states. Just look at Virginia, had one poll come in with Trump up, and HOLY FUCKING SHIT ITS TIME TO RIOT AND RIDE OUR GOLDEN GOD MAGANUS ONTO THE ALTAR OF FREEDOM.", '>>{penguins2946} : But are those polls getting upvoted to 80% like this poll is? And were those Trump supporters not criticized for being hilariously picky with the polls too? "They did it first!!!" is the defense of a 2nd grader to be honest.', ">>{ChlkDstTtr} : Most of us Hillary supporters aren't. Some are though. I think most of it is a defense mechanism to deal with the near-constant the_donald brigades. I also think the reason this sub has turned mostly pro-Hillary is directly related to how active the_donald is across Reddit. Regardless, don't lump all of us into one bucket, just like Hillary supporters shouldn't hold all Trump supporters accountable for the_donald.", ">>{rtechie1} : The problem is that most people don't really grasp how much power modern smartphones use. The exploding Note 7 illustrates this. Crank charging is right out. It takes hours of pedaling on a stationary bike to charge cellphones. That means solar. And for solar you need big panels. Something [like this](https://www.amazon.com/Nekteck-Solar-Universal-Charger-2-Port/dp/B017GQ7OEA/).", ">>{txyesboy} : I'd love to see evidence to the concerns of the vetting process. It would seem to me that achieving 100% success in the vetting process (no refugees have participated in a terrorist act on American soil) suggests the vetting process works fine. The only way to top 100% is to not participate in bringing in refugees at all. But hey, that would be discriminatory, anti-human rights, and just downright shitty human behavior that our country would never engage in, right? Right?? I gotta say, Conservatives LOVE their guns, their tattoos, their liquor, their military, and profess to want to fight anyone who dare try to infringe upon their God Given Rights. But when you tell them a bunch of scared elderly and female and children refugees want to come to America to live the American dream, Conservatives shit themselves in absolute fear.", '>>{BudrickBundy} : That talking point is not only dishonest but it insults the intelligence of the voters who are concerned about that. People know when a company closes down a plant that they work at and moves production to another country. My area used to have quite a lot of manufacturing, one of the largest in my area was manufacturing a product whose brand name is so ubiquitous that people use it to describe the product. Think what "Kleenex" has become (it\'s not Kleenex). This product is now made in China. The company that I work for, a different major brand, used to manufacture its products right nearby, but moved it overseas in the 2000s. Since then we have seen customer service jobs moved over there, then tech support, scheduling, engineering, programming, and a number of other jobs. They\'re working right up the value chain! Even if the quality of the workers isn\'t the same it\'s hard to pass up being able to hire people for a fraction of what it would cost to hire an American. And I can\'t blame the companies for doing this. The rules make it so you\'re stupid to not take advantage of these differences. For jobs that cannot be outsourced, such as nursing or landscaping, there are the H1B ad H2B visas. And of course low-skill work including landscaping and others are often filled by illegal aliens -- people who should be deported! Politicians have not been representing normal folks for a long time. Sad to see you buying the extremely dishonest "those jobs don\'t exist anymore" talking point, but not surprising!', '>>{txyesboy} : I worked for a major US firm in a management position; a white collar office job managing white collar tech support and customer service employees. It wasn\'t upper management, and the employees weren\'t upper crust elites; we were just happy to be part of a major US corporation\'s goals and very college campus attitude and lifestyle. I was then asked to start providing management guidance to outsourced employees in Bangalore India, who were slowly being trained up and introduced into our workforce doing a small percentage of what the employees I managed did. Slowly over time, the employees that I met with every week and developed performance reviews for and provided career guidance to, expressed their concerns to the fears that they were being replaced. I assured them that, the upper management team I reported to told me this was simply a global initiative to provide "round the clock" support and customer service to all our customers around the world and nothing to fear. I was then asked to go to Bangalore personally to train more individuals there. Being just after 9/11, I politely refused, as "white people" were considered a target for ransom; especially if you were an employee of a major globally recognized firm. We found a *ahem* "regular employee" from another team in our building who had no knowledge of what we did, but had family in Bangalore, and we quickly trained him up so he could go there to train employees there. He was a very nice guy and glad to do so, but wasn\'t qualified for this task; but we crash coursed him on it, and I\'m sure he ended up doing fine. I say "ended up doing fine" because it really didn\'t fucking matter. The goal was to cut costs and incentivize tax breaks for the company. It mattered not how good the outsourced Indian employees named "Steve" and "Michelle" performed in the job compared to their US counterparts. I know this firsthand because I performed QA/Coaching/Review (choose your buzzword you prefer here as you wish) on both the domestic and foreign employees work with customers - their interactions with them. Most if not all the work was email support based. The most simple grasping of English vernacular in simple conversational transactions were "foreign" in more ways than one. It was a fucking train wreck. Each quarter, the ratio of work assigned to our domestic employees to outsourced went down and down and down( yet our American employees\' customer service satisfaction scores continued to improve (as much as could in a "cost recovery" center). Didn\'t. Matter. Within the course of just over a full fiscal year, my team was dissolved and 50+ employees were "reassigned" to other roles in the company - including myself. The team in India had horrid customer satisfaction scores; didn\'t matter. Before I\'d left, I had been tasked with trying to assist with the PR disaster associated with these horrid satisfaction scores, and public outcry in the tech sector regarding outsourcing. I was asked to do benchmarking against other branches of the same company but served different customer bases (fledgling ISP, online gaming host services, recently co-partnered cable TV network, etc). I got as far as reviewing the "glowing customer satisfaction ratings" of the fledgling ISP\'s customers. Their support center was in Manila, but their management was mainland. I asked them point blank how they achieved over 95% satisfaction ratings. "Simple. We toss out the scores that are from people that are so dissatisfied they are canceling their service" What percentage of your overall customer interactions that are surveyed fit that criteria? "About 90%" Fuck. Me. I left the company disheartened and the illusion of working with what appeared to be such a great company to all outward appearances was shattered. Before I\'d left, before I\'d been reassigned, I counseled my employees individually one last time: "Don\'t be too trusting. Don\'t accept your skill set is Good enough - ever. Prepare yourself to always be ready to find new employment where opportunities arise. Don\'t limit yourself to one skill set or trade. Make yourself as valuable as you can." Within another 2 1/2 years, the entire customer service branch located in our state - a few hundred employees strong.... Gone. I heard from employees that stuck around until the end, but many of them were appreciative to not candy coat what was inevitable and helping them prepare for new employment in more secure ad fruitful fields of employ. I\'ve been working with two of them now for the last ten years. Protesters marched in front of this companies\' offices when the outsourcing was complete, and it made the local news. My wife wrote our state representative - a Republican (we were both Republican at the time, she still is) to complain about outsourcing. Her response was politico-speak "Global economy", "Helping keep American companies profitable", blah blah. We wrote back asking if we could outsource *her* job. Funny, we received no response. I missed visiting my grandmother on her deathbed out of state so I could complete the three rounds of interviews to rise above the massive amount of people who\'d applied for the management position in the first place. They said they\'d be accommodating for such things, but I wasn\'t stupid: corporations don\'t care. My mother advised me my grandmother would understand. So, do I have any personal feedback to provide on the subject? Maybe a little. But perhaps you have more to offer than my meager example?', ">>{BudrickBundy} : That sounds a lot like the direction a lot of employers are going in. My employer actually started with Ireland back when it was still a low wage country, then tried Bangalore. Indians have a very poor accent so they opened up an office in the Philippines, which has seen the most growth over the years since. They even moved manufacturing from the US to the Philippines. Republicans and Democrats have both screwed us on this shit. Big donors love it because it means higher corporate profits. While I think he's pretty nutty overall, Sanders is closer to Trump on this than any other person who ran for either party's nomination this year.", ">>{redditorandcheef} : It's funny I remember seeing Donald call him the biggest loser on earth a few years back, and stone didn't still didn't take trumps dick out of his own mouth after it.", ">>{ChlkDstTtr} : Be nice. He's actually a really chill and reasonable guy if you aren't condescending to him. Objectively, in this sub it's probably tougher to be an undecided or 3rd party supporter than it is to be a Trump supporter because you're getting it from both sides. It sounds like he is leaning Hillary so give him valid reasons to do so rather than giving him shit.", ">>{Risley} : It is, and so is complaining about the other side when you know you're doing it too. Heres a pro tip. If you want to be an adult, admit that both sides have done this and that its shitty. Then someone might respect you.", ">>{rtechie1} : You're going to run into a problem with simultaneous viewing. Most of these cameras are designed for home security and have a single login to a web site. Did a bit of digging and [D-Link specifically talks about creating up to 64 users](http://www.dlink.com/uk/en/support/faq/cameras-and-surveillance/dcs-series/how-many-users-can-i-assign-to-the-camera) with their camera system. An example is this [DCS-933](http://shop.us.dlink.com/shop/shop-security/camera/day-night-wi-fi-camera-dcs-933l.html). Consider a single camera setup using Ethernet for the camera because churches don't normally have big IT budgets. If you really intend to have parents using the church WiFi network to monitor the cameras you might have to upgrade / extend your WiFi network as well.", '>>{MidnightMoonlight_} : Phhh, all he needs to do is casually win Florida, Iowa, North Carolina and Strong democratic states like New Hampshire, Colorado and Nevada. EZ 4 trump /s', ">>{niktemadur} : The fact that it's so close in so many states, or even the fact that he's carrying so many of them, is a horrible sign for the current state of the general US psyche, let alone its' politics.", ">>{24hoursopen} : Her data is infinitely better than what we have. Internal polling and modeling showed that Obama never really had to worry in 2012 and accurately called everything. She has the same metrics with 4 more years of dev time on top. So I'm not convinced it's that close. She has two stops in Ohio before election day. Ohio is out of play for her according to most of the public polling. Ohio is not part of the firewall, so if she's spending time there it means the data says it's worth it and the firewall is probably secure.", ">>{BunsTown} : I hated seeing Maher go easy on him. Maher isn't a lawyer, but I saw a few ins Maher could have exploited during the interview. Stone seems like the worst of the worst. I wonder what Hayden was feeling that whole time.", ">>{BunsTown} : That's what a guilty man looks like. Hayden was looking right through him... and no doubt Hayden had a few old guard in tow with him in the green room. Can't believe I'm backing the IC so staunchly, but shit is real right now.", ">>{rtechie1} : Cheap Android tablets are uniformly terrible. Since you're thinking Moonlight anyway, [Nvidia Shield](https://www2.nvidia.com/en-us/shield/tablet/).", ">>{rtechie1} : Every single 4K HDR TV I'm aware of has a smart TV suite. Might want to look at [Sony](http://www.sony.com/electronics/televisions/xbr-x850d-series), their TVs run Android TV.", '>>{AfroPanther} : I wonder whether the Latino vote could propel Hillary to a victory there.', ">>{rtechie1} : You've got a long feature list, anything that does what you want is going to be expensive. [Doorbird](https://www.doorbird.com/comparison) is exactly what you want, it's even got an open API, but it's $350.", ">>{txyesboy} : After drafting that loooong email, I recognized that my last statement at the end of it came across as pretty snarky. I recognize we all want the right to work, and certainly don't want to see our jobs go overseas. And yes I was being somewhat glib about the aspect that *all* rust belt jobs are gone. They're not, nor are manufacturing ones. But it is a fair statement to assess that our American workforce in this part of the country is in dire need of targeted vocational education to meet the demands that bringing back manufacturing and assembly jobs require to perform these skills. There's a far more concerted effort towards automation, so more education targeted towards computer programming and hardware tech repair.", '>>{NeuronMaps} : Meet a Pulsating Pile Of Hot Garbage In July.', '>>{NeuronMaps} : Meet a Pulsating Pile Of Hot Garbage In July.', ">>{BudrickBundy} : These changes can be done rather rapidly with coordination between employers and local governments and institutions. I have seen this done in areas down south where a large new factories have been built for Boeing and for various car companies. There's coordination with trade schools and community colleges to train workers for these industries. It can be done relatively easily in areas in the north and Midwest that still have the comparatively better trade schools and community colleges in place. What Donald Trump has done is completely change the status quo on trade. Even if he disappoints, and I don't think he will, his supporters bought into it and now expect change on this. Also, it's very likely that the Democrat party will nominate someone from that Sanders/Warren wing in 2020. So on trade, regular Americans win whether or not Trump is successful. On immigration it's still up to Trump to get it right because I don't see the other party interested in deporting illegals, securing the border, fixing the H1B & H2B visa systems, and making legal immigration more of a program to benefit the interests of everyday Americans and less like a charity.", ">>{penguins2946} : Wait, are you implying I'm a Trump supporter? Read through my posts for like a second and you'll realize how hilariously dumb that is. I criticized Trump supporters for citing those polls the same way I'm criticizing it in here. I'm just a non-partisan person who thinks both sides are just as delusional as the other.", ">>{treerat} : Nixon will finally be going to jail, on Roger Stone's back.", '>>{Gordy312} : That is why Hillary was in Detroit yesterday and in Pittsburgh today. Because those states are all wrapped up for her!', ">>{unsilviu} : NH is tied in a bunch of today's polls :/", '>>{lelbrahhh} : How about a budget of 200? Or 100... Please do one for both! Thanks! ;D', ">>{fizzlemcdizzle} : It's gonna be a longtime before windows can fix it and not make it a half baked wonky os, windows 10 needs to be rebuilt imo, working with metro UI was novel but it shouldn't have translated into desktop format. They need to allow more apps on their store and only recommend you to use them if your in tablet/phone mode.", ">>{FuzzyBacon} : If anything she's going to Ohio to force Trump to do the same. Right now he *has* to flip a blue state, and that won't happen if he's in Ohio defending what he's already got.", ">>{Ninguemquersaberxd} : Hello , I would like to know if anyone could advise me on what portable bluetooth speaker to buy. My budget is around 250 dólares/220 euros . I care the most about portabality , loudness , sound quality need to be at least decent. I've been looking at Ue megaboom the most but I want to hear another person's opinion. I just want to say that I do own a speakers right now and that is the sony srs x2", '>>{NewOrient} : Georgia resident here. I voted against trump last night. Felt great. What is really crazy is that Gwinnett County, which is a huge county in Georgia and is super republican traditionally is already rumored to be heavily blue based on early voting', ">>{rtechie1} : You can find the slightly-slower [Samsung PM951](https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-PM951-128GB-Solid-MZVLV128HCGR-00000/dp/B01DK4BUUQ/) for $100 for 128GB or about $150 for 256. Samsung seems to have got the kinks out in gen3. Note that most motherboards don't have M.2 slots (unless they are very recent) so you'll also need a PCI Express adapter.", '>>{callmemrpib} : Does that include Trump winning a vote from Maine ir Clinton in Nebraska?', ">>{celtic_thistle} : He's legitimately unhinged, and it shows when he interacts with people on social media.", '>>{AjaxTFC} : Thanks. I needed a good laugh this morning.', ">>{KharakIsBurning} : I'm looking for a device that isn't already listened on The Verge. Seeing as the subreddit's front page is already the Verge, where should I go?", ">>{Obiwontaun} : That's not going to happen. Might as well say if he wins every state it's over.", '>>{lelbrahhh} : Is the Galax HOF 1080 better than Gaming Z 1080? Or X?', ">>{Obiwontaun} : Ha, ha, yeah. I'll see myself out.", '>>{NotTheTokenBlackGirl} : Fulton County has record early voter turnout. Georgia might be the real surprise in this election if Metro Atlanta turns out to vote against Trump.', '>>{meestic} : Hey guys, I am looking for a daily sports watch that I could wear everywhere. I do all kinds of sports, including running, mountain skiing, swimming, etc. I like the design and options of Garmin Fenix 3, except that IT IS HUUUGE. I really hate that size - and I don\'t even have a small wrist ("6+). I wear smart clothes mostly and it looks ridiculous with my suit. Are there any more options on the market that are decent looking and smaller (like at least two thirds the size)? Haven\'t tried Suunto Ambit3 yet, but as I saw in pictures - its very similar to the Fenix.', ">>{troyanthony} : Your just upset because I'm the only guy you know with a dick on the front and the back. - Roger Stone", '>>{93_Vector} : I\'d never seen that before, but TYT really did. The second Jones gave up his microphone, I\'d have just taken the battery out of the bottom and stuffed it in the couch cushions. "Whoops, you\'re off the air now Alex. Sorry."', ">>{xurxoham} : Intel released some time ago the 600p series. Is also a NVMe SSD. Performance is not on par with other NVMe (that Samsung is top end) but price is really good. I got a 512gb one and I'm very happy. Your PC needs an special connector though. NVMe is not SATA.", ">>{rtechie1} : Smaller means losing features. You can try the [Garmin Forerunner 630](https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/into-sports/running/forerunner-630/prod516105.html) which isn't a lot smaller but doesn't loose too many features. The [vivosmart HR+](https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/wearabletech/wearables/vivosmart-hr-/prod548743.html) seems to be the smallest GPS watch you can buy.", '>>{NateFroggyFrog} : Hey everybody, I know this is a very specific post so if you think it belongs elsewhere please let me know where. I am looking for the most simple and small gadget I can find that can accurately gauge ranges of at least 10 meters and either display the range, or notify if a specific range has been met - i.e. beep when within a distance of 10 meters, not beep outside of 10 meters. Does such a thing exist? If so what are my best options?', '>>{JohnGillnitz} : That was actually pretty funny. But, seriously, fuck Roger Stone.', '>>{readyformorebjj} : I am looking for a tablet/detachable laptop as mostly a tool for note taking (OneNote/Evernote) Any smart people out there have suggestions on a solution(s) that would have decent battery-life, ability to stream video, sturdy. I would imagine a SSD would be a nice feature as well. Thank you in advance for your time and assistance.', '>>{JohnGillnitz} : He is desperate enough to go on Bill Maher. If I were his lawyer, I would quit after a stunt like that. He looked like a person who very much has something to hide acting like he has nothing to hide. WTF is it with authoritarians and bronzer? You would think with all the time they spend on the golf course, they could get a real tan.', ">>{Schohrf} : Oh yeah, that's the one where he described germany and europe as hellholes, overrun by raping and pillaging refugees (I am paraphrasing, his actual words were worse and are sadly still there). To this day it pisses me off that he was given a public platform by reddit.", ">>{Mathog} : Hello, I'm not really up to date in terms of life-improving/productivity gadgets, so I would love someone to make me aware that they even exists. For example, only recently was I made aware that noise-cancelling headphones are a thing and now I'm on search for the best. What are some useful gadgets I might not know about?", ">>{ImArcherVaderAMA} : Now that the Note 7 is dead, is there any similarly spec'd competitor THAT HAS A STYLUS? Stylus function is incredibly important to my phone use. Actually mandatory. Are there any phones out there that have a great screen for a great stylus, with a great camera, processing power, and expandable memory?", ">>{GuyInAChair} : On *Pop Politics* this afternoon he repeatedly said the Russian election story is just an attempt to distract from Podesta's connection to the Kremlin.", '>>{StringTableError} : A couple years ago, I took the plunge and got a MacBook Air. Most biologist seem to use Macs and it made life easier to get one (sharing, editing documents, keeping presentations and other content consistent). After seeing the new options, I will not be getting a new Mac. What would be a reasonable PC laptop that has long battery life with a good quality 15" screen and can handle Photoshop and Illustrator?', ">>{hzumbru1} : The hp spectre is the closest thing to a MacBook Air if you're just looking for a more powerful Windows version. It's screen is only 13.3 inches though. Asus also makes plenty of ultrabooks if you want to browse their website. I also tend to see a lot of acer products that are interesting. If you want I could send you specific recommendations if needed.", ">>{dunsomething123} : I've bought a full aquarium setup from china, lights, heater, filter. I want to bring it home to the US. If I get a (chinese) 4 way extension plug, and plug that into a travel adapter, would that be safe to use long term?", '>>{awfulsome} : For how despicable Trump is, he has a knack for surrounding himself with people much worse. It is like he has the Legion of Doom on speed dial.', '>>{lelbrahhh} : Can someone tell me a good motherboard that has the following: - KILLER Ethernet - Z170 - 1151 Socket - Under 300 - USB 3.0 or higher - M.2 slot - Other goods ;D Thanks! <3', '>>{malabongbabae} : hi! is huawei p9 plus a good phone? asus zenfone 3 ultra or huawei p9 plus? thank you!', '>>{SnapDeeTuck} : He is on a media tour trying to convince everyone that this is all just normal shit and as usual the Clintons are way worse. Do not believe his lies.', '>>{ja734} : thats /r/iamversmart material if ive ever seen it.', '>>{nfwright} : Hey what would you recommend for a large capacity, and large battery mp3 player?', ">>{theryanmoore} : Pissed me the fuck off too. I was banned from /r/politics for a WEEK just because I asked him if he had ever possessed a conscience. I get that we want other people to come do AMAs but this guy is the scum on the bottom of regular scum's shoe.", '>>{Trumpov} : Go team periwinkle! Better dead than an orange Red!', '>>{lelbrahhh} : Hey! Can someone check my PC out? Im going to make it soon! Tell me some advice on what to change or something like that! Thanks! http://pcpartpicker.com/list/2p2Tr7 Also, it says that the compatibility is not compatible and needs an M.2 slot... Although it has it... I think. Tell me what you think on the PC!', ">>{MWM2} : Man, I'm so sleepy today it must have taken me nearly five seconds to get the joke.", '>>{MWM2} : Maybe he\'s literally taken Trump\'s dick in his mouth. > Stone continued jumping between the campaign trails — for Pennsylvania Republican Arlen Specter and Kansas Republican Bob Dole — until he was kicked off Dole\'s presidential campaign after Stone and his wife were caught soliciting "similar couples or exceptional muscular" men for group sex. Stone denied the accusations at the time but later admitted they were accurate.', '>>{lelbrahhh} : ANY GOOD 650W POWER SUPPLY? I want one thats GOLD + Certified, or higher! ;D', ">>{MWM2} : I didn't know about Stone's involvement in the Brooks Brothers riot. > In 2000 [Stone] was instrumental in orchestrating the so-called Brooks Brothers riot — a chaotic pro-Bush protest outside the Miami recount center — which helped shut down the Florida recount in the presidential election, securing George W. Bush's victory over Al Gore.", '>>{lelbrahhh} : Can someone tell me a good motherboard which has KILLER ETHERNET???? AT LEASSSSTT??? AND 3.1 or 3.0 USB PORTS????', '>>{lelbrahhh} : Can someone tell me the difference between G.Skill TridentZ and G.Skill Ripjaws V? If they are the same, which is better? Heres what Im planning to get: DDR4 16 GB of ram. Also, which speed should I get? Please tell me! ;D No budget, if so... It would be 150... :D', '>>{Scrimshawmud} : He seemed kind of jacked on that video. Pills?', '>>{Scrimshawmud} : Uber progressive here, feel the same way. Shit got weird.', '>>{fun_two} : Surface Pro. Prices should be coming down in a couple of weeks.', ">>{rebelraiders101} : Check out the Dell XPS 15. Might be a little overkill with some configurations, but I think that will be the next laptop after my current MacBook. It's real nice. Battery life might also not be as great as you're looking for, if you get the specced out options.", '>>{StringTableError} : Thanks for the suggestion. The spectre does look nice. Surprising from HP. Looking at the other HP options, I like the Envy 15t with 4K screen. It looks similar to the 15" macbook pro.', '>>{captainn00dles} : Did you the interview on real time this week? Between him and Santorum the shit was getting deep.', '>>{BunsTown} : Yeah. No doubt there was some stuff going on behind the scenes there. No way NSA CIA guy is going to an appearance with a major scoundrel, without pushing him around a bit.', ">>{tokinbl} : >Stone has a tattoo of Nixon's face across his back and a large photograph of the former president over his bed. Suspect af", ">>{Schiffy94} : C'mon /u/Roger-Stone, let's see you deflect this one.", ">>{catwordjuice123} : killer build. your ssd plugs into the mobo directly rather than a sata cable so it will disable a pcie slot. doesnt matter, you weren't gonna use it anyway. you will need more storage though. I would recommend at least another tera of storage. 512 isnt gonna be enough for your rig once you get all those fancy games.", ">>{seventeenblackbirds} : Ok, so I've read Stone also tried to hook up with another couple to do some swinging. This story has now been inextricably linked in my mind to that tattoo, because I keep imagining being the one who takes him up on the swinging, then finds out about that. Like, you look over and he's taking off his shirt or going at it like a madman and you make direct eye contact with his tattoo of Richard Nixon. You realize, perhaps, that you have made a huge mistake. Perhaps you are in too deep. This may be a panorama that you cannot fully understand. You gaze at Richard Nixon, and so too does Richard Nixon gaze into you. You're welcome.", '>>{tokinbl} : I dont usually wish harm upon people but this man is the exception, holy shit could he be a bigger p.o.s.', '>>{mexicocitibluez} : His biggest defense was this article he said he wrote on Breitbart which is [fully debunked here](https://thinkprogress.org/roger-stones-alibi-falls-apart-a1c3cc0aaf7a).', '>>{Hozzaq} : if thunderbolt 3 speed is 3 time faster than regular usb type-c why there is no android smartphone using it?', ">>{EpiphanyMoon} : I tried to submit a link. It didn't take for some godforsaken reason. So here's the briefing. I got given a straight talk, Android powered, ZTE, Unico, LTE most awesome phone I've ever had. The model has been discontinued BTW. Or I'd have bought another. The phone stopped charging. Sporadically. Sometimes would, most times wouldn't. Yes, I tried the plethora of diff cables, charging ports, outlets. Yes I tried it all. Went to Wally world. I needed the same phone (right size for hand, can wear on belt at work for quick whateva's). Discontinued model. They sent me to battery plus. There I was told battery fine, go to Boost place to check the charging port. I go to Boost. After 30 minutes of listening to Trump/ Pence insanity, I was told the charging port cannot be fixed, because it isn't a separate thing, it is connected to the whole contraption. Please someone, please, tell me there is some secret voodoo fix for this. Any help is greatly appreciated. The phone was perfect for me, my hand (carpal issues) and I need it on my job. Any help I will be so grateful for. It's a freaking charging port. Surely a plan for fixing was RIE'ed into the possible mess of what could go wrong. Thanks guys/gals. Resurrecting this phone has become so important. The one I had to buy sucks (cuz I have to have one at work)", ">>{morpheousmarty} : It's hard to do that kind of debate live, and he also had to resist getting truly pissed at him. But I agree Stone is the worst. He's like if t_d was a real person with a lifetime of political experience.", '>>{redditorandcheef} : It would not surprise me they probably pissed on one another, that seems to be dons kink.', '>>{tbgrover} : Hello chums, desperate to upgrade my current setup (2012 MacBook Pro with SSD /8gb ram/i7 and plugged into cintiq 27"-so it\'s always closed and I never used as a laptop) had hoped Apple would do something that I could buy in to, but sadly not. So going PC. Who should I be buying from (in the UK)? And any recommended specs (want something very quiet, ideally utterly silent and while I don\'t do anything fancy in 3D, other than the odd sketch up design, would be nice to have an option to buy into VR at some point...) my budget is around £1k (or a little more-don\'t need screen/don\'t need keyboard/mouse) and my preference is for solid build quality. Any/all advice is great! Cheers!', '>>{MWM2} : > they probably pissed on one another *Lovely.* Somehow that thought didn\'t occur to me. "Okay, Donnie! Your turn to gargle!"', ">>{LillyPip} : Holy shit, that's a fascinating and disturbing read. I can't decide if he's outright lying, really believes what he says and is just that delusional, has convinced himself of alternate facts to make the money more palatable, or some combination of the above. I'm pretty sure whatever was left of his soul was excised under Nixon, though, judging by how much he fangirls over the guy. I honestly don't know how he and his cronies sleep at night, what with all the lies, hatred, backstabbing, and treason. Money's nice, but your dignity, humanity, and soul are a pretty steep price.", ">>{EpiphanyMoon} : On the off chance anyone has a miracle fix for this, couldya inbox me n let me know u posted. Reddit doesn't notify me by email anymore. My own screwup. I've reversed it, but, yah, it ain't reversed yet. Thx gadget people.", '>>{readyformorebjj} : Which surface would be the minium you would recommend?', ">>{iswwitbrn} : > I hated seeing Maher go easy on him. Maher isn't a lawyer, but I saw a few ins Maher could have exploited during the interview. The two were practically chumming it over how much they hate Muslims and SJWs. Fuck that. Maher is basically Trump with a more economically liberal and slightly less anti-vaccine bent.", ">>{ElectricAccordian} : I remember when he said that we should be ok with him saying that Bernie Sanders should get shot because Stephan Colbert makes jokes and we like Stephan Colbert. Although I don't remember Colbert saying that we should be violent against political opponents...", ">>{fenrisulvur} : He has a flat head because his parents didn't correct it when he was a baby. https://www.google.is/search?q=flat+baby+head&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwipltvH94bTAhVFvBQKHXYwBd8Q_AUICCgB&biw=1187&bih=977", '>>{amputeenager} : I think this needs to be on a tombstone. Not mine. But someones.', '>>{fun_two} : I have the Surface 3. Worth the money. If you want it as a primary device, I suggest you get the dock with it and a monitor to go with.', ">>{MWM2} : So - you don't want to hear a Roger Stone rap about his ***deep*** love of scatology?", ">>{coffeespeaking} : > WTF is it with authoritarians and bronzer? Remember Romney on Univision? [Note the hands and face.](http://a.abcnews.com/images/ABC_Univision/UNI_romney_drugmexico_120920_wg.jpg) His face is part-Mexican, part Oompa Loompa. (It's a sociopath thing.)", ">>{MWM2} : *I have poop ev'ry day.* *I consume it ev'ry way.* *I call it PooStonin'.* *I love hot steaming poop slurpies.* *Hell yeah!* *Best from a tender virgin's butt.* *Who just has had Mexican food for lunch.* *Chunka-Chunk-Chunk.* *Are those refried beans?* *Yumma-yum-yum.* *Pour the urine ice all up in there.* *Slurp, slurp. Stick my tongue out...* *And make like an anteater.* *PooStonin'!* --- I wish there was a phrase that described the feeling you have when you've made yourself sick but you can't stop laughing at yourself.", ">>{p_121} : The last couple years I've been buying cheaper android phones, and now I just want one that has decent battery life and will last me a long time. Here are the big things I care about in a phone: -battery life -decent front facing and rear camera -can get latest updates of apps like Snapchat and Instagram\\ -in general, quick and snappy when it comes to browsing the internet I don't really care about gaming too much. I just want something that is reliable and somewhat cheap. I was thinking about the Note 3. I'd preferably like an Android phone of some kind because they're cheaper than iPhones. What do you all think?", '>>{lelbrahhh} : So, I should get an external hard drive? Which has 1 TB?', ">>{lelbrahhh} : Which is better? DDR4 3200 (2x8) 16 GB Ripjaws V or TridentZ? I don't care about their price.", '>>{PlayMp1} : Yeah, dude has a better sense of humor than I expected.', ">>{nickmortensen} : He's trying to channel Tom Wolfe. The novelist.", '>>{Dear_Occupant} : Going on Real Time had nothing to do with that though.', '>>{Meta0X} : * ...if t_d was a real person * ...with a lifetime of political experience. Pick one. Both simultaneously within the same being is impossible.', ">>{Scrimshawmud} : I want some inside info! Where's /u/billmaher??", '>>{FliceFlo} : Does anyone know of a device that has 2 (preferably 3) hdmi/optical inputs and one of each respective output that acts as a switcher? Think hdmi switcher/optical audio switcher but in 1 device. Edit: Something like [this](https://www.amazon.com/Octava-Audio-switch-Optical-output/dp/B009B2NCOE) but perhaps simpler and cheaper.', '>>{zaviex} : He got ripped a few years back he likes to go shirtless now lol. He marched shirtless in a pride parade once even', ">>{Scrimshawmud} : Haha, I meant jacked like on speed. But hey, if he's into working out, at least there's one thing he likes that he can keep doing in prison!", '>>{lelbrahhh} : Is the Samsung 950 PRO 512GB M.2-2280 Solid State Drive compatible with Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 ATX LGA1151 Motherboard?', ">>{AllGoodMenDie} : The Moto z play is a good phone with everything you want. The Moto z play also has Motorola's cool modules. I would also suggest a nexus 6p great phone although a year old.", '>>{AllGoodMenDie} : Here are the changes I made http://pcpartpicker.com/list/fPXtWX I switched the weird 500gig SSD that you had to a 250gig SSD for your operating system and then added a 1tb hard drive for all your games and media.', ">>{griffeny} : Jesus, Bill Maher. What's the score now?", '>>{neurosisxeno} : After going on Real Time he was actually slated to speak at CPAC. What brought him down was with his popularity some teenage girl in Canada dug up some old clips of him and started spamming them on social media.', '>>{Metkis} : Is there a discord for this sub to talk about tech?', '>>{mthrfkn} : Bill Maher had nothing to do with that even though he loves to take credit.', '>>{lelbrahhh} : How much space does Windows 10 64bit (home) take?', '>>{catwordjuice123} : no not an external just a regular ol hard drive http://hdd.userbenchmark.com/', '>>{BKrispy} : You should check out BLU phones. They specialize in budget phones that are a real big bang for the buck.', ">>{BKrispy} : Ipod classic would be a good choice but it's officially discontinued and needs itunes. If that doesnt work with you check out this https://www.amazon.com/Sony-NWZ-A15-Walkman-Video-Player/dp/B00N3WWU5K/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1429190874&sr=8-1&keywords=Sony+A15 You'll just need a new SD card.", '>>{OriginalWF} : If its the same speed, amount, etc., then there is not going to be a real discernible difference. Just get the one that looks better to you.', '>>{OriginalWF} : The new moto m (?) is supposed to come with a massive 5100 mah battery. That will probably give you the best battery life of any phone out and I believe they have pretty good cameras.', ">>{seventeenblackbirds} : Probably mine. Ever since I had that thought, every time anyone mentions Roger Stone's Nixon tattoo, it haunts me. Might as well let it follow me to the grave.", ">>{mthrfkn} : And yet it was a video pulled by *a teenager who were watching videos old YouTube vids that brought down Milo. I think it's cute how much Maher and his fans credit him for this when it's not his to claim. Also he's an asshole.", ">>{baggysmills} : >It is your right as an American to peacefully assemble. Unfortunately, we are seeing more rioting than protesting lately. Sad! Wow, did Trump write that? >Nixon was among our greatest Presidents. Read my upcoming book Um.... >Where's the proof it's a lie, douchebag? What a douche.", ">>{OriginalWF} : Licensing fees I believe. Usb is an open (or at least cheaper) standard whereas companies don't want to pay an the extra cost to have thunderbolt ports on their phone.", ">>{OriginalWF} : Personally I am not a fan of asymmetric designs, so I don't really like the two-tone of the TridentZ. I usually go for something that would look good with the build you have or are going for. I always like to even out the colors so there isn't too much of one or the other. Really there isn't a difference between the two except or style.", '>>{lelbrahhh} : Can someone tell me (your opinion) the best gaming mousepad? I just want peoples opinion! ;D', '>>{lelbrahhh} : A good 650 WATT Gold+ certified power supply?', ">>{llllIlllIllIlI} : I sort of like the theory that he's not actually involved in the collusion but that he is a braggart who *wants* to be and so he talks a big game... I mean who knows but it's entertaining to me at least...", ">>{celtic_thistle} : Well, if that's the case, hopefully his nasty little mouth gets him in trouble! :D", '>>{TheManWhoWasNotShort} : [Got me some of dat sweet, sweet karma posting it on AMA disasters though!] (https://www.reddit.com/r/AMADisasters/comments/5rvux5/this_is_a_bit_preemptive_but_theres_absolutely_no/) Lol', ">>{mthrfkn} : He's an asshole, he had no role in exposing Milo. If a teenager hadn't exposed Milo, this would have backfired on Maher. Fuck him.", ">>{rillo561} : Roger was talking in circles on Maher's show. Such a weasel", ">>{mthrfkn} : She's completely important, Bill was being crucified for brining on Milo. He's so lucky that a teenager had enough balls to get it right.", ">>{carl_888} : Stone has been active in the Washington swinging scene for decades, this [first became public in 1996](http://www.democraticunderground.com/images/homepage/stone_enquirer_inside.gif) via The National Enquirer when he was working for Bob Dole's campaign.", ">>{drewjitzu} : Yeah I was really disappointed that Jimmy Dore spit his drink at Jones and didn't even own up to it or apologize. He didn't get suspended or anything either as far as I know.", '>>{Minerva7} : Bill Maher had Roger bring out a Marijuana cake mid-way through the episode and Mr. Stone did not look like he appreciated it very much.', ">>{FizzleMateriel} : Fucking hell, you weren't kidding. What the hell was he thinking?", ">>{CrypticRandom} : To be fair, most historical witch hunts did end up finding witches, it's just that our definition of what constitutes a witch has shifted since then.", '>>{coolcris} : He also appeared on Vice News. Denies all allegations, but his body language heavily indicated that he was guilty as fuck.', ">>{987f} : Every witch hunt thinks they find a witch. That's the point of calling it a witch hunt.", ">>{coffeespeaking} : He was trying to woo the Latino vote. (Univision is a Latino channel.) Mitt was born of American parents in Mexico...which makes him part Mexican, in his mind. Still, what I wouldn't do for Mittens in the White House right now. Better a President who claims to be Mexican when he isn't than the asshat xenophobe we got instead.", '>>{morpheousmarty} : Fair enough, the trollish half truth nature of t_d with the experience to truly weaponize it.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{drive_me_away} : Opinion piece, doesn't at all reflect what I'm seeing on the streets.", '>>{SKHRAEURPL} : Yes because half of america has putins dick in their ass and trumps down their throat.', ">>{DumpsterDon} : Thanks Comrade. We'll be ok. In the meantime, it's pretty fun nit picking every little and big fuck up Dumpster manages to get himself into.", '>>{drive_me_away} : Ah, I see. I thought they were supporting Trump because there were no jobs. Economic anxiety?', ">>{DaWolverine} : Perhaps I'm a little insensitive about this but idk if chuck schumer tearing up at trumps EO was very smart. The democrats need to stand up to trump and the GOP by showing there strength not there sensitivity. Instead of tear up, get mad but also be professional. Most critics called out the incompetence of the EO, and that's what we should be doing, not crying about it. I'm not saying men and woman shouldn't ever cry, at times it is powerful but in this case I feel a more strong, measured response would've been more impactful.", '>>{nmanl} : im glad under obama all of them were able to find all those jobs.', '>>{CuntTheRouge} : I think there is a point to this. There is no strategy, and no clear message to focus and hammer on the contempt of court in Virginia, Bannon--the really top stuff.', '>>{Megaloman71} : Walking out to the mailbox in front of the trailer park to collect your welfare check isn\'t included in the labor department figures as a "job".', '>>{troll_is_obvious} : As much as right-wingnuts like to piss and moan about Wa-Po bias, at least they allow differing opinion pieces. Can you imagine such a blatantly partisan but left leaning hack being given a forum at Breitbart?', '>>{BudrickBundy} : I have a pretty good job but my home town is full of some of those decaying factories that litter our nation\'s landscape like tombstones that Trump talked about in his inauguration. And I\'m not even in the rust belt, which has been absolutely devastated. And that\'s not the only problem related to the status quo on "jobs" issues like immigration, trade, or taxes. Trump\'s election was necessary for a lot of reasons, "jobs" among them.!', '>>{sjwsrs} : because schumer is a giant pussy. and this is the guy leading dems in the senate? nobody at the helm of the dnc, and a washed up old hag leading dems in the house. no wonder dems have lost over a thousand state seats, 12 governorships, 10 senate seats, 50+ house seats...... christ, "babbling and discouraged" would be a high water mark for this crack squad of ne\'er-do-wells.', '>>{drive_me_away} : I hope that the economy continues to improve in those areas. I do believe it is very hard. I just don\'t think that particular argument ("Trump supporters have jobs! Liberals are protesting because they are unemployed bums!") is very honest. The number of people I saw say "Get a job!" online about the airport protests, for example, was eye-roll inducing. Those happened on a Saturday.', ">>{i-am-sancho} : I thought they didn't have jobs and that's why they voted for a man promising government would solve all their problems", ">>{BIG__GREEN} : Yeah, it's interesting to see the Washington bubble elite perspective because in the facebook-and-pavement world it's a very different story.", ">>{DaWolverine} : I think the democrats don't understand that even hardcore liberals want leaders who can be strong and tough but also fight for progressive policies and advocate for progressive ideas. The democrats now think that they gotta be so sensitive and politically correct to cater to there base when unfortunately at this point it doesn't even seem they have a base There is the bernicrats The hardcore SJW liberals The moderate democrats The Reagan democrats And of corse u can't forget that u need independents And I'm sure the vast majority of these people not only want progressiveness but also a show of strength. Especially toward the current opposition that is the GOP", '>>{BudrickBundy} : Those guys really need to get jobs, lives whatever. The protests are idiotic.', ">>{drive_me_away} : Well, thanks. I've been attending them, and I work.", ">>{scrappykitty} : I'm fine with Schumer. I wish Nancy would retire.", ">>{BudrickBundy} : The [executive order](http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/25/text-trump-executive-order-on-enhancing-public-safety-in-interior-united-states.html) was a load of common sense except for the part that prohibited green card holders, which was quickly fixed. I actually listened to former Congressman Rob Simmons' take on it on a local radio program this morning and it was awesome. Too bad I can't find the audio!", '>>{drive_me_away} : Aside from the fact that people who had visas and were on planes had already been vetted.', '>>{TrollKong} : When 99% of mainstream media is anti-Trump, you need someone like Breitbart that is unabashedly pro-Trump.', ">>{BudrickBundy} : The Trump Administration is not confident in the current vetting process and is also not confident that the countries on this list are doing their due diligence to make sure they aren't sending terrorists our way. That's the point of the order! A small number of people were inconvenienced.", ">>{oohhh} : I'd love to hear why you think the EO was a load of common sense.", ">>{Justtryme90} : McDonald's doesn't count, people who make real money don't support Trump.", ">>{Justtryme90} : No, you need to get your head checked if you're pro Trump.", '>>{txyesboy} : Almost as idiotic as the belief that "jobs" that no longer exist in this country are coming back. Spoiler Alert: many of these jobs literally went away, period - not overseas; just went away. You simply cannot bring back jobs that no longer exist.', ">>{txyesboy} : I'd love to see evidence to the concerns of the vetting process. It would seem to me that achieving 100% success in the vetting process (no refugees have participated in a terrorist act on American soil) suggests the vetting process works fine. The only way to top 100% is to not participate in bringing in refugees at all. But hey, that would be discriminatory, anti-human rights, and just downright shitty human behavior that our country would never engage in, right? Right?? I gotta say, Conservatives LOVE their guns, their tattoos, their liquor, their military, and profess to want to fight anyone who dare try to infringe upon their God Given Rights. But when you tell them a bunch of scared elderly and female and children refugees want to come to America to live the American dream, Conservatives shit themselves in absolute fear.", '>>{BudrickBundy} : That talking point is not only dishonest but it insults the intelligence of the voters who are concerned about that. People know when a company closes down a plant that they work at and moves production to another country. My area used to have quite a lot of manufacturing, one of the largest in my area was manufacturing a product whose brand name is so ubiquitous that people use it to describe the product. Think what "Kleenex" has become (it\'s not Kleenex). This product is now made in China. The company that I work for, a different major brand, used to manufacture its products right nearby, but moved it overseas in the 2000s. Since then we have seen customer service jobs moved over there, then tech support, scheduling, engineering, programming, and a number of other jobs. They\'re working right up the value chain! Even if the quality of the workers isn\'t the same it\'s hard to pass up being able to hire people for a fraction of what it would cost to hire an American. And I can\'t blame the companies for doing this. The rules make it so you\'re stupid to not take advantage of these differences. For jobs that cannot be outsourced, such as nursing or landscaping, there are the H1B ad H2B visas. And of course low-skill work including landscaping and others are often filled by illegal aliens -- people who should be deported! Politicians have not been representing normal folks for a long time. Sad to see you buying the extremely dishonest "those jobs don\'t exist anymore" talking point, but not surprising!', '>>{txyesboy} : I worked for a major US firm in a management position; a white collar office job managing white collar tech support and customer service employees. It wasn\'t upper management, and the employees weren\'t upper crust elites; we were just happy to be part of a major US corporation\'s goals and very college campus attitude and lifestyle. I was then asked to start providing management guidance to outsourced employees in Bangalore India, who were slowly being trained up and introduced into our workforce doing a small percentage of what the employees I managed did. Slowly over time, the employees that I met with every week and developed performance reviews for and provided career guidance to, expressed their concerns to the fears that they were being replaced. I assured them that, the upper management team I reported to told me this was simply a global initiative to provide "round the clock" support and customer service to all our customers around the world and nothing to fear. I was then asked to go to Bangalore personally to train more individuals there. Being just after 9/11, I politely refused, as "white people" were considered a target for ransom; especially if you were an employee of a major globally recognized firm. We found a *ahem* "regular employee" from another team in our building who had no knowledge of what we did, but had family in Bangalore, and we quickly trained him up so he could go there to train employees there. He was a very nice guy and glad to do so, but wasn\'t qualified for this task; but we crash coursed him on it, and I\'m sure he ended up doing fine. I say "ended up doing fine" because it really didn\'t fucking matter. The goal was to cut costs and incentivize tax breaks for the company. It mattered not how good the outsourced Indian employees named "Steve" and "Michelle" performed in the job compared to their US counterparts. I know this firsthand because I performed QA/Coaching/Review (choose your buzzword you prefer here as you wish) on both the domestic and foreign employees work with customers - their interactions with them. Most if not all the work was email support based. The most simple grasping of English vernacular in simple conversational transactions were "foreign" in more ways than one. It was a fucking train wreck. Each quarter, the ratio of work assigned to our domestic employees to outsourced went down and down and down( yet our American employees\' customer service satisfaction scores continued to improve (as much as could in a "cost recovery" center). Didn\'t. Matter. Within the course of just over a full fiscal year, my team was dissolved and 50+ employees were "reassigned" to other roles in the company - including myself. The team in India had horrid customer satisfaction scores; didn\'t matter. Before I\'d left, I had been tasked with trying to assist with the PR disaster associated with these horrid satisfaction scores, and public outcry in the tech sector regarding outsourcing. I was asked to do benchmarking against other branches of the same company but served different customer bases (fledgling ISP, online gaming host services, recently co-partnered cable TV network, etc). I got as far as reviewing the "glowing customer satisfaction ratings" of the fledgling ISP\'s customers. Their support center was in Manila, but their management was mainland. I asked them point blank how they achieved over 95% satisfaction ratings. "Simple. We toss out the scores that are from people that are so dissatisfied they are canceling their service" What percentage of your overall customer interactions that are surveyed fit that criteria? "About 90%" Fuck. Me. I left the company disheartened and the illusion of working with what appeared to be such a great company to all outward appearances was shattered. Before I\'d left, before I\'d been reassigned, I counseled my employees individually one last time: "Don\'t be too trusting. Don\'t accept your skill set is Good enough - ever. Prepare yourself to always be ready to find new employment where opportunities arise. Don\'t limit yourself to one skill set or trade. Make yourself as valuable as you can." Within another 2 1/2 years, the entire customer service branch located in our state - a few hundred employees strong.... Gone. I heard from employees that stuck around until the end, but many of them were appreciative to not candy coat what was inevitable and helping them prepare for new employment in more secure ad fruitful fields of employ. I\'ve been working with two of them now for the last ten years. Protesters marched in front of this companies\' offices when the outsourcing was complete, and it made the local news. My wife wrote our state representative - a Republican (we were both Republican at the time, she still is) to complain about outsourcing. Her response was politico-speak "Global economy", "Helping keep American companies profitable", blah blah. We wrote back asking if we could outsource *her* job. Funny, we received no response. I missed visiting my grandmother on her deathbed out of state so I could complete the three rounds of interviews to rise above the massive amount of people who\'d applied for the management position in the first place. They said they\'d be accommodating for such things, but I wasn\'t stupid: corporations don\'t care. My mother advised me my grandmother would understand. So, do I have any personal feedback to provide on the subject? Maybe a little. But perhaps you have more to offer than my meager example?', ">>{BudrickBundy} : That sounds a lot like the direction a lot of employers are going in. My employer actually started with Ireland back when it was still a low wage country, then tried Bangalore. Indians have a very poor accent so they opened up an office in the Philippines, which has seen the most growth over the years since. They even moved manufacturing from the US to the Philippines. Republicans and Democrats have both screwed us on this shit. Big donors love it because it means higher corporate profits. While I think he's pretty nutty overall, Sanders is closer to Trump on this than any other person who ran for either party's nomination this year.", ">>{txyesboy} : After drafting that loooong email, I recognized that my last statement at the end of it came across as pretty snarky. I recognize we all want the right to work, and certainly don't want to see our jobs go overseas. And yes I was being somewhat glib about the aspect that *all* rust belt jobs are gone. They're not, nor are manufacturing ones. But it is a fair statement to assess that our American workforce in this part of the country is in dire need of targeted vocational education to meet the demands that bringing back manufacturing and assembly jobs require to perform these skills. There's a far more concerted effort towards automation, so more education targeted towards computer programming and hardware tech repair.", ">>{BudrickBundy} : These changes can be done rather rapidly with coordination between employers and local governments and institutions. I have seen this done in areas down south where a large new factories have been built for Boeing and for various car companies. There's coordination with trade schools and community colleges to train workers for these industries. It can be done relatively easily in areas in the north and Midwest that still have the comparatively better trade schools and community colleges in place. What Donald Trump has done is completely change the status quo on trade. Even if he disappoints, and I don't think he will, his supporters bought into it and now expect change on this. Also, it's very likely that the Democrat party will nominate someone from that Sanders/Warren wing in 2020. So on trade, regular Americans win whether or not Trump is successful. On immigration it's still up to Trump to get it right because I don't see the other party interested in deporting illegals, securing the border, fixing the H1B & H2B visa systems, and making legal immigration more of a program to benefit the interests of everyday Americans and less like a charity."], ['>>{spitfire9107} : You guy sthink there will ever be a laptop like nintendo switch. I always wanted a device that can replace my laptop/kindle/and smartphone. Surface pro was close to doing it because with SP4 I could replace my laptop and kindle but not my phone. I am thinkin ga device like SFP4 but that can be used as a phone. It could be like nintendo switch where I remove a part of it and its a phone to carry and when I get home I attach that part so its a tablet/laptop again.', ">>{internationengineer} : I'm looking to replace my old home stereo amplifier with a surround sound system with 4+ hdmi inputs. It also should have a child proof feature that locks out the buttons on the front and just gives the remote the control. I'm looking to spend less than $400.", '>>{PureBlooded} : Looking for a home projector (hopefully portable): - Something that allows 720-1080p video (4k is a bonus) - Something that is relatively aesthetic - Something that has the option to use external speakers (either via bluetooth or aux cable) - Something that can connect via USB/HDMI - Something can comes with a remote, or I can buy a remote for, or that can be controlled via an app - A decent brand', ">>{electrictrumpet} : I have always wanted a phone that had a super high quality camera on it, better than most cellphones. Something with glass optics, possibly a zoom lens? Doing a quick search the Samsung Galaxy S4 Zoom is pretty close to what I'm thinking of, although it is an older model. I met a guy who had a similar device from Panasonic. Asian model, big zoom lens, android powered. What modern android devices fit this form factor and are available unlocked (I use Verizon in the US)?", ">>{Engage_Physically} : I need some help installing Netflix onto my Samsung Smart TV please. I can't find it anywhere or where to download it.", ">>{evilr2} : Asus already tried the Padfone where you dock the phone into a bigger screen and turn it into a tablet. I could see MS doing something like this in the future, possibly a Surface phone, that can dock into larger, Surface Pro type 2 in 1 with the phone being the brains. They're still working on making continuum a more PC like experience and this will be a much better experience in the future. The HP Elite X3 and the HP Lapdock combo looks cool, but its expensive and continuum and Win 10 mobile still need improvements to be a viable option for most people.", ">>{evilr2} : I would probably just go with a Samsung Galaxy S7 for a good all around camera. If you really do need something with optical zoom, then you can get a Moto Z from Verizon and purchase this camera add-on that attaches to the phone. It's not cheap though. https://www.verizonwireless.com/accessories/hasselblad-true-zoom-camera-mod-black/?cmp=CSE-C-HQ-NON-R-AC-NONE-ACC-2C0PX0-PX-PLA-89867N&cvosrc=cse.google.89867N&cvo_crid=110153009364", '>>{hzumbru1} : Well the Moto z had a camera mod like that that you can slap on the back of it, and the z force the bigger battery, and shatter proof screen version is a Verizon exclusive.', ">>{tetsugo} : There is some Smartphone with an OLED screen that is not pentile? I don't perceive SO much difference between my 1080p LCD screen and some OLED screen with higher resolution (except for the contrast and the obvious advantage over LCD) and I believe that is because of the RGB matrix of LCD. I'm misleading myself on this? There is a Quad HD OLED with RGB subpixel matrix?", '>>{Rayston} : Can anyone recommend a peephole door camera that meets the following requirements? Wi-Fi Color Output can be fed to cell phone (Android) and/or PC Motion activated with alerts to cell phone Time/date log Audio(Just preferred)', '>>{AllGoodMenDie} : Asus made a phone with x3 optical zoom https://www.asus.com/us/Phone/ZenFone-Zoom-ZX551ML/ Sony phones although expensive and not that great do have the best cameras on the market.', ">>{AllGoodMenDie} : From what I can find their isn't a great peephole camera that does what you want but this doorbell camera seems to meet your requirements https://ring.com/", '>>{Rayston} : Thank you for the help. Little expensive for my tastes and I prefer something more open platform (but I did not put that in my requirements). Nonetheless It is probably going in my short list for this solution. Thank You!', '>>{KEVLAR60442} : Can someone recommend a 4K HDR TV without superfluous smart features? I have a Shield Console for that. Preferably 50 inches, give or take, and preferably less than 2000 dollars.', ">>{Super_Secret_SFW} : I want a cheap tablet, powerful enough to operate Moonlight over wifi and probably run Reddit is Fun. What's a good name to look at? Budget is highest of priority", '>>{Vanderpool_joel} : Alright guys i need help finding a camera system. My church is looking at installing cameras in our pre-school area that will allow parents to view their children during the church services. Obviously it would need to be app based that they could download on their phones. What do you all suggest? Also, they are looking at a live streaming service with which they will be able to stream the service as it happens in the preschool area so the workers will be able to view the service. Thanks for your help in advance!', '>>{PM_ME_STEAMGAMES_PLS} : Do you guys have any suggestions for a crank/pedal powered phone charger? Also, any good solar battery chargers out there? I have been told that those Chinese ones from ebay are really crappy even in a full sunny day.', '>>{lelbrahhh} : What is the best or popular SSD Storage out there? I need anything at least 500GB and with a high IOPS (INPUTS & OUTPUTS PER SECOND). Either that or anything best in your opinion. Be sure to tell me if its the best in your opinion, or popular. Thanks!', ">>{xXVoicesXx} : I figure that this isn't a hot laptop to most, but it's a great update to the HP Stream series brought out two years ago, and slightly refreshed last year. Has anybody been able to find this for sale? I'm having the hardest time find it on HP's website, and when I look at other retailers online, I'm not sure if it's the old version because the picture doesn't seem to match what HP is advertising. [HP article](http://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-news/blog/mobile-computing/cloud-computing-experience.html) [Article](https://www.engadget.com/2016/08/10/hp-stream-14/) [HP splash page](http://store.hp.com/us/en/ContentView?storeId=10151&langId=-1&catalogId=10051&eSpotName=new-stream)", ">>{baberim} : Have there been any rumblings about a new Logietch Harmony remote? Usually the new remote(s) release around this time of year (Oct 2015, July 2014, August 2013....) but I haven't heard anything.", ">>{rtechie1} : Which one were you looking for? The first article talks about 4 different laptops, the HP Stream 11, Stream 14, Stream 11 Pro, and Stream X360. I'm not seeing the Stream 14 and Stream X360 on HP's website, but on Amazon. Some laptops are retailer-exclusive.", ">>{rtechie1} : Assuming an unlimited budget (you didn't specify), something like the [Samsung 950 Pro PCIe NVMe drive](https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-950-PRO-Internal-MZ-V5P512BW/dp/B01639694M/). NVMe is essentially the future of storage. (Source: I'm a engineer who works in Dell's Storage Test Labs.)", ">>{rtechie1} : The problem is that most people don't really grasp how much power modern smartphones use. The exploding Note 7 illustrates this. Crank charging is right out. It takes hours of pedaling on a stationary bike to charge cellphones. That means solar. And for solar you need big panels. Something [like this](https://www.amazon.com/Nekteck-Solar-Universal-Charger-2-Port/dp/B017GQ7OEA/).", ">>{rtechie1} : You're going to run into a problem with simultaneous viewing. Most of these cameras are designed for home security and have a single login to a web site. Did a bit of digging and [D-Link specifically talks about creating up to 64 users](http://www.dlink.com/uk/en/support/faq/cameras-and-surveillance/dcs-series/how-many-users-can-i-assign-to-the-camera) with their camera system. An example is this [DCS-933](http://shop.us.dlink.com/shop/shop-security/camera/day-night-wi-fi-camera-dcs-933l.html). Consider a single camera setup using Ethernet for the camera because churches don't normally have big IT budgets. If you really intend to have parents using the church WiFi network to monitor the cameras you might have to upgrade / extend your WiFi network as well.", ">>{rtechie1} : Cheap Android tablets are uniformly terrible. Since you're thinking Moonlight anyway, [Nvidia Shield](https://www2.nvidia.com/en-us/shield/tablet/).", ">>{rtechie1} : Every single 4K HDR TV I'm aware of has a smart TV suite. Might want to look at [Sony](http://www.sony.com/electronics/televisions/xbr-x850d-series), their TVs run Android TV.", ">>{rtechie1} : You've got a long feature list, anything that does what you want is going to be expensive. [Doorbird](https://www.doorbird.com/comparison) is exactly what you want, it's even got an open API, but it's $350.", '>>{lelbrahhh} : How about a budget of 200? Or 100... Please do one for both! Thanks! ;D', ">>{fizzlemcdizzle} : It's gonna be a longtime before windows can fix it and not make it a half baked wonky os, windows 10 needs to be rebuilt imo, working with metro UI was novel but it shouldn't have translated into desktop format. They need to allow more apps on their store and only recommend you to use them if your in tablet/phone mode.", ">>{Ninguemquersaberxd} : Hello , I would like to know if anyone could advise me on what portable bluetooth speaker to buy. My budget is around 250 dólares/220 euros . I care the most about portabality , loudness , sound quality need to be at least decent. I've been looking at Ue megaboom the most but I want to hear another person's opinion. I just want to say that I do own a speakers right now and that is the sony srs x2", ">>{rtechie1} : You can find the slightly-slower [Samsung PM951](https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-PM951-128GB-Solid-MZVLV128HCGR-00000/dp/B01DK4BUUQ/) for $100 for 128GB or about $150 for 256. Samsung seems to have got the kinks out in gen3. Note that most motherboards don't have M.2 slots (unless they are very recent) so you'll also need a PCI Express adapter.", ">>{KharakIsBurning} : I'm looking for a device that isn't already listened on The Verge. Seeing as the subreddit's front page is already the Verge, where should I go?", '>>{lelbrahhh} : Is the Galax HOF 1080 better than Gaming Z 1080? Or X?', '>>{meestic} : Hey guys, I am looking for a daily sports watch that I could wear everywhere. I do all kinds of sports, including running, mountain skiing, swimming, etc. I like the design and options of Garmin Fenix 3, except that IT IS HUUUGE. I really hate that size - and I don\'t even have a small wrist ("6+). I wear smart clothes mostly and it looks ridiculous with my suit. Are there any more options on the market that are decent looking and smaller (like at least two thirds the size)? Haven\'t tried Suunto Ambit3 yet, but as I saw in pictures - its very similar to the Fenix.', ">>{xurxoham} : Intel released some time ago the 600p series. Is also a NVMe SSD. Performance is not on par with other NVMe (that Samsung is top end) but price is really good. I got a 512gb one and I'm very happy. Your PC needs an special connector though. NVMe is not SATA.", ">>{rtechie1} : Smaller means losing features. You can try the [Garmin Forerunner 630](https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/into-sports/running/forerunner-630/prod516105.html) which isn't a lot smaller but doesn't loose too many features. The [vivosmart HR+](https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/wearabletech/wearables/vivosmart-hr-/prod548743.html) seems to be the smallest GPS watch you can buy.", '>>{NateFroggyFrog} : Hey everybody, I know this is a very specific post so if you think it belongs elsewhere please let me know where. I am looking for the most simple and small gadget I can find that can accurately gauge ranges of at least 10 meters and either display the range, or notify if a specific range has been met - i.e. beep when within a distance of 10 meters, not beep outside of 10 meters. Does such a thing exist? If so what are my best options?', '>>{readyformorebjj} : I am looking for a tablet/detachable laptop as mostly a tool for note taking (OneNote/Evernote) Any smart people out there have suggestions on a solution(s) that would have decent battery-life, ability to stream video, sturdy. I would imagine a SSD would be a nice feature as well. Thank you in advance for your time and assistance.', ">>{Mathog} : Hello, I'm not really up to date in terms of life-improving/productivity gadgets, so I would love someone to make me aware that they even exists. For example, only recently was I made aware that noise-cancelling headphones are a thing and now I'm on search for the best. What are some useful gadgets I might not know about?", ">>{ImArcherVaderAMA} : Now that the Note 7 is dead, is there any similarly spec'd competitor THAT HAS A STYLUS? Stylus function is incredibly important to my phone use. Actually mandatory. Are there any phones out there that have a great screen for a great stylus, with a great camera, processing power, and expandable memory?", '>>{StringTableError} : A couple years ago, I took the plunge and got a MacBook Air. Most biologist seem to use Macs and it made life easier to get one (sharing, editing documents, keeping presentations and other content consistent). After seeing the new options, I will not be getting a new Mac. What would be a reasonable PC laptop that has long battery life with a good quality 15" screen and can handle Photoshop and Illustrator?', ">>{hzumbru1} : The hp spectre is the closest thing to a MacBook Air if you're just looking for a more powerful Windows version. It's screen is only 13.3 inches though. Asus also makes plenty of ultrabooks if you want to browse their website. I also tend to see a lot of acer products that are interesting. If you want I could send you specific recommendations if needed.", ">>{dunsomething123} : I've bought a full aquarium setup from china, lights, heater, filter. I want to bring it home to the US. If I get a (chinese) 4 way extension plug, and plug that into a travel adapter, would that be safe to use long term?", '>>{lelbrahhh} : Can someone tell me a good motherboard that has the following: - KILLER Ethernet - Z170 - 1151 Socket - Under 300 - USB 3.0 or higher - M.2 slot - Other goods ;D Thanks! <3', '>>{malabongbabae} : hi! is huawei p9 plus a good phone? asus zenfone 3 ultra or huawei p9 plus? thank you!', '>>{nfwright} : Hey what would you recommend for a large capacity, and large battery mp3 player?', '>>{lelbrahhh} : Hey! Can someone check my PC out? Im going to make it soon! Tell me some advice on what to change or something like that! Thanks! http://pcpartpicker.com/list/2p2Tr7 Also, it says that the compatibility is not compatible and needs an M.2 slot... Although it has it... I think. Tell me what you think on the PC!', '>>{lelbrahhh} : ANY GOOD 650W POWER SUPPLY? I want one thats GOLD + Certified, or higher! ;D', '>>{lelbrahhh} : Can someone tell me a good motherboard which has KILLER ETHERNET???? AT LEASSSSTT??? AND 3.1 or 3.0 USB PORTS????', '>>{lelbrahhh} : Can someone tell me the difference between G.Skill TridentZ and G.Skill Ripjaws V? If they are the same, which is better? Heres what Im planning to get: DDR4 16 GB of ram. Also, which speed should I get? Please tell me! ;D No budget, if so... It would be 150... :D', '>>{fun_two} : Surface Pro. Prices should be coming down in a couple of weeks.', ">>{rebelraiders101} : Check out the Dell XPS 15. Might be a little overkill with some configurations, but I think that will be the next laptop after my current MacBook. It's real nice. Battery life might also not be as great as you're looking for, if you get the specced out options.", '>>{StringTableError} : Thanks for the suggestion. The spectre does look nice. Surprising from HP. Looking at the other HP options, I like the Envy 15t with 4K screen. It looks similar to the 15" macbook pro.', ">>{catwordjuice123} : killer build. your ssd plugs into the mobo directly rather than a sata cable so it will disable a pcie slot. doesnt matter, you weren't gonna use it anyway. you will need more storage though. I would recommend at least another tera of storage. 512 isnt gonna be enough for your rig once you get all those fancy games.", '>>{Hozzaq} : if thunderbolt 3 speed is 3 time faster than regular usb type-c why there is no android smartphone using it?', ">>{EpiphanyMoon} : I tried to submit a link. It didn't take for some godforsaken reason. So here's the briefing. I got given a straight talk, Android powered, ZTE, Unico, LTE most awesome phone I've ever had. The model has been discontinued BTW. Or I'd have bought another. The phone stopped charging. Sporadically. Sometimes would, most times wouldn't. Yes, I tried the plethora of diff cables, charging ports, outlets. Yes I tried it all. Went to Wally world. I needed the same phone (right size for hand, can wear on belt at work for quick whateva's). Discontinued model. They sent me to battery plus. There I was told battery fine, go to Boost place to check the charging port. I go to Boost. After 30 minutes of listening to Trump/ Pence insanity, I was told the charging port cannot be fixed, because it isn't a separate thing, it is connected to the whole contraption. Please someone, please, tell me there is some secret voodoo fix for this. Any help is greatly appreciated. The phone was perfect for me, my hand (carpal issues) and I need it on my job. Any help I will be so grateful for. It's a freaking charging port. Surely a plan for fixing was RIE'ed into the possible mess of what could go wrong. Thanks guys/gals. Resurrecting this phone has become so important. The one I had to buy sucks (cuz I have to have one at work)", '>>{tbgrover} : Hello chums, desperate to upgrade my current setup (2012 MacBook Pro with SSD /8gb ram/i7 and plugged into cintiq 27"-so it\'s always closed and I never used as a laptop) had hoped Apple would do something that I could buy in to, but sadly not. So going PC. Who should I be buying from (in the UK)? And any recommended specs (want something very quiet, ideally utterly silent and while I don\'t do anything fancy in 3D, other than the odd sketch up design, would be nice to have an option to buy into VR at some point...) my budget is around £1k (or a little more-don\'t need screen/don\'t need keyboard/mouse) and my preference is for solid build quality. Any/all advice is great! Cheers!', ">>{EpiphanyMoon} : On the off chance anyone has a miracle fix for this, couldya inbox me n let me know u posted. Reddit doesn't notify me by email anymore. My own screwup. I've reversed it, but, yah, it ain't reversed yet. Thx gadget people.", '>>{readyformorebjj} : Which surface would be the minium you would recommend?', '>>{fun_two} : I have the Surface 3. Worth the money. If you want it as a primary device, I suggest you get the dock with it and a monitor to go with.', ">>{p_121} : The last couple years I've been buying cheaper android phones, and now I just want one that has decent battery life and will last me a long time. Here are the big things I care about in a phone: -battery life -decent front facing and rear camera -can get latest updates of apps like Snapchat and Instagram\\ -in general, quick and snappy when it comes to browsing the internet I don't really care about gaming too much. I just want something that is reliable and somewhat cheap. I was thinking about the Note 3. I'd preferably like an Android phone of some kind because they're cheaper than iPhones. What do you all think?", '>>{lelbrahhh} : So, I should get an external hard drive? Which has 1 TB?', ">>{lelbrahhh} : Which is better? DDR4 3200 (2x8) 16 GB Ripjaws V or TridentZ? I don't care about their price.", '>>{FliceFlo} : Does anyone know of a device that has 2 (preferably 3) hdmi/optical inputs and one of each respective output that acts as a switcher? Think hdmi switcher/optical audio switcher but in 1 device. Edit: Something like [this](https://www.amazon.com/Octava-Audio-switch-Optical-output/dp/B009B2NCOE) but perhaps simpler and cheaper.', '>>{lelbrahhh} : Is the Samsung 950 PRO 512GB M.2-2280 Solid State Drive compatible with Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 ATX LGA1151 Motherboard?', ">>{AllGoodMenDie} : The Moto z play is a good phone with everything you want. The Moto z play also has Motorola's cool modules. I would also suggest a nexus 6p great phone although a year old.", '>>{AllGoodMenDie} : Here are the changes I made http://pcpartpicker.com/list/fPXtWX I switched the weird 500gig SSD that you had to a 250gig SSD for your operating system and then added a 1tb hard drive for all your games and media.', '>>{Metkis} : Is there a discord for this sub to talk about tech?', '>>{lelbrahhh} : How much space does Windows 10 64bit (home) take?', '>>{catwordjuice123} : no not an external just a regular ol hard drive http://hdd.userbenchmark.com/', '>>{BKrispy} : You should check out BLU phones. They specialize in budget phones that are a real big bang for the buck.', ">>{BKrispy} : Ipod classic would be a good choice but it's officially discontinued and needs itunes. If that doesnt work with you check out this https://www.amazon.com/Sony-NWZ-A15-Walkman-Video-Player/dp/B00N3WWU5K/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1429190874&sr=8-1&keywords=Sony+A15 You'll just need a new SD card.", '>>{OriginalWF} : If its the same speed, amount, etc., then there is not going to be a real discernible difference. Just get the one that looks better to you.', '>>{OriginalWF} : The new moto m (?) is supposed to come with a massive 5100 mah battery. That will probably give you the best battery life of any phone out and I believe they have pretty good cameras.', ">>{OriginalWF} : Licensing fees I believe. Usb is an open (or at least cheaper) standard whereas companies don't want to pay an the extra cost to have thunderbolt ports on their phone.", ">>{OriginalWF} : Personally I am not a fan of asymmetric designs, so I don't really like the two-tone of the TridentZ. I usually go for something that would look good with the build you have or are going for. I always like to even out the colors so there isn't too much of one or the other. Really there isn't a difference between the two except or style.", '>>{lelbrahhh} : Can someone tell me (your opinion) the best gaming mousepad? I just want peoples opinion! ;D', '>>{lelbrahhh} : A good 650 WATT Gold+ certified power supply?'], ['>>{HunterGreen} : Clinton Pulls Within 1 Point In Georgia In Latest Polls', '>>{jaCASTO} : I rather have them live in NC and FL and increase black + youth turnout there as opposed to trying to reach out any further to traditionally red areas.', '>>{dwf1967} : Agreed. Not the time to be tilting at windmills. Play good defense and run out the clock.', '>>{Trumpbart} : Yeah. GA is a reach and not worth it. NC is the place to plant Barack and Michelle.', '>>{HumptyMcDumpty} : the GA chapter of the Sweet Potato Queens need to be voting their conscience about now.', ">>{buy_iphone_7} : Trump is doomed. If he loses Georgia he's done.", ">>{Macd7} : I voted for her here. That'd be so cool if she did", '>>{paid4this} : Poor Donnie fans. Are they going to have to schlong themselves? Are they going to schlong each other? This is going to get ugly!', ">>{gotsafe} : The fact that you can say that about 10 battleground states isn't usually a good sign for your campaign", '>>{penguins2946} : in latest polls It was one poll, while two others show Trump up at 7 points and 9 points. Of the last 12 polls, only 2 of them show Clinton is within 1 point of Georgia. Most of them have Trump up comfortably 4-6%.', ">>{penguins2946} : Maybe if you just listen to the echo chamber of this sub, you may think that Clinton actually has a chance in Georgia. In reality, it's more likely that Trump wins PA than Clinton wins Georgia according to 538. http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/georgia/ http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/pennsylvania/", '>>{paid4this} : Bet every cent you have on Donnie to win. Promise you will.', ">>{ChlkDstTtr} : You're right about that. Not that 538 is the end-all, but the chances are really slim in Georgia. Hillary fans will dream about GA and AZ, just as Trump fans will dream about PA and MI. NC and FL are too close for anyone's comfort. Regardless of your side it's going to be a lot closer than any of us would like.", ">>{penguins2946} : A. Not a Trump supporter, I'm probably going to end up voting Clinton. B. How is that relevant to saying that Clinton isn't going to win Georgia? I mean, come on, Clinton supporters have become even more toxic on this sub than usual recently.", '>>{Lord_Molyb} : President Obama was here (UNC) yesterday! There was quite a bit of interest among the other students so hopefully it ends up leading to a big turnout here.', ">>{penguins2946} : At this point, really the only contested states will be Florida, North Carolina, Nevada and New Hampshire (3 most recent polls are a tie, +5 for Trump and +1 for Trump). I think the rest are pretty clearly in the bag for each candidate. Clinton's problem is that if Trump wins those 4 states, the electoral college will be tied at 269.", '>>{paid4this} : > How is that relevant to saying that Clinton isn\'t going to win Georgia? What is wrong with you? Have you suffered a stroke? Here is my comment, the one you are referring to: "Poor Donnie fans. Are they going to have to schlong themselves? Are they going to schlong each other? This is going to get ugly!" ??? Please do us all a favor and take a few days off, don\'t use this sub, just do something else. Just be quiet.', ">>{ChlkDstTtr} : Which causes a whole different mess. Let's hope the election is decisive so we don't have several more weeks of heartburn.", ">>{ChlkDstTtr} : Also, I'd be surprised if he bagged all four, but it's not out of the question.", '>>{penguins2946} : Well you\'re certainly supporting my "Clinton supporters are toxic on this sub" theory, that\'s for sure. You were responding to an article about Georgia being close to "Poor Donnie fans", to which I responded with this poll is just an outlier and he\'s going to win Georgia. There\'s really no reason to think this election will get ugly for Trump in the next 5 days, so it sounded like you were using this poll as justification for that.', '>>{penguins2946} : I\'d be surprised for him to get all 4 too, but I could definitely see him getting North Carolina, Florida and Nevada. That would get this election to be very close and Trump will just fuel the "this election is rigged!!!" nonstop if that does happen. That\'s why I\'m concerned with this, Trump doesn\'t have a legitimate argument for the election being rigged if the EC count is like 370 to 170.', '>>{Risley} : at this point, yes. We need NC to stay in our column and frankly she should stop going to all these other random ass states. Stick to the firewall and ensure that that is secure. Its too close now.', ">>{Risley} : umm, Trump's team has been doing the same shit about other heavily Hillary favored states. Just look at Virginia, had one poll come in with Trump up, and HOLY FUCKING SHIT ITS TIME TO RIOT AND RIDE OUR GOLDEN GOD MAGANUS ONTO THE ALTAR OF FREEDOM.", '>>{penguins2946} : But are those polls getting upvoted to 80% like this poll is? And were those Trump supporters not criticized for being hilariously picky with the polls too? "They did it first!!!" is the defense of a 2nd grader to be honest.', ">>{ChlkDstTtr} : Most of us Hillary supporters aren't. Some are though. I think most of it is a defense mechanism to deal with the near-constant the_donald brigades. I also think the reason this sub has turned mostly pro-Hillary is directly related to how active the_donald is across Reddit. Regardless, don't lump all of us into one bucket, just like Hillary supporters shouldn't hold all Trump supporters accountable for the_donald.", ">>{ChlkDstTtr} : Be nice. He's actually a really chill and reasonable guy if you aren't condescending to him. Objectively, in this sub it's probably tougher to be an undecided or 3rd party supporter than it is to be a Trump supporter because you're getting it from both sides. It sounds like he is leaning Hillary so give him valid reasons to do so rather than giving him shit.", ">>{Risley} : It is, and so is complaining about the other side when you know you're doing it too. Heres a pro tip. If you want to be an adult, admit that both sides have done this and that its shitty. Then someone might respect you.", '>>{MidnightMoonlight_} : Phhh, all he needs to do is casually win Florida, Iowa, North Carolina and Strong democratic states like New Hampshire, Colorado and Nevada. EZ 4 trump /s', ">>{niktemadur} : The fact that it's so close in so many states, or even the fact that he's carrying so many of them, is a horrible sign for the current state of the general US psyche, let alone its' politics.", ">>{24hoursopen} : Her data is infinitely better than what we have. Internal polling and modeling showed that Obama never really had to worry in 2012 and accurately called everything. She has the same metrics with 4 more years of dev time on top. So I'm not convinced it's that close. She has two stops in Ohio before election day. Ohio is out of play for her according to most of the public polling. Ohio is not part of the firewall, so if she's spending time there it means the data says it's worth it and the firewall is probably secure.", '>>{AfroPanther} : I wonder whether the Latino vote could propel Hillary to a victory there.', ">>{penguins2946} : Wait, are you implying I'm a Trump supporter? Read through my posts for like a second and you'll realize how hilariously dumb that is. I criticized Trump supporters for citing those polls the same way I'm criticizing it in here. I'm just a non-partisan person who thinks both sides are just as delusional as the other.", '>>{Gordy312} : That is why Hillary was in Detroit yesterday and in Pittsburgh today. Because those states are all wrapped up for her!', ">>{unsilviu} : NH is tied in a bunch of today's polls :/", ">>{FuzzyBacon} : If anything she's going to Ohio to force Trump to do the same. Right now he *has* to flip a blue state, and that won't happen if he's in Ohio defending what he's already got.", '>>{NewOrient} : Georgia resident here. I voted against trump last night. Felt great. What is really crazy is that Gwinnett County, which is a huge county in Georgia and is super republican traditionally is already rumored to be heavily blue based on early voting', '>>{callmemrpib} : Does that include Trump winning a vote from Maine ir Clinton in Nebraska?', '>>{AjaxTFC} : Thanks. I needed a good laugh this morning.', ">>{Obiwontaun} : That's not going to happen. Might as well say if he wins every state it's over.", ">>{Obiwontaun} : Ha, ha, yeah. I'll see myself out.", '>>{NotTheTokenBlackGirl} : Fulton County has record early voter turnout. Georgia might be the real surprise in this election if Metro Atlanta turns out to vote against Trump.'], [">>{saucytryhard} : Meet Roger Stone: One of Donald Trump's most loyal supporters who is now being investigated by FBI", ">>{congerbot} : He seemed pretty confident he didnt do anything on Bill Maher's show this weekend.", '>>{RynheartTheReluctant} : >"It\'s rare that I\'m accused of something that I\'m not guilty of," Stone told the New Yorker in 2008. Now it\'s up to investigators to test that. _Such_ dumb. He\'s a caricature.', '>>{tank_trap} : Trump and his cronies need to all go to jail. The sooner, the better for the country.', ">>{balmergrl} : The article left out the fact Stone was given authority over BIA and Indian Gaming by Bush Jr, presumably as a thank you for his role to orchestrate the Brooks Bros riot http://www.villagevoice.com/news/a-dirty-tricksters-bush-bonanza-6407578 Also that he ran Al Sharpton's campaign (mostly out of his own pocket) to undermine DNC and Gary Johnson's campaign to take out Ron Paul. Fantastic collection of articles, once I started I couldn't stop https://italkyoubored.wordpress.com/2014/02/04/roger-stone-pretty-reckless-is-going-straight-to-hell-part-one/", ">>{HumanShadow} : >He's a caricature. Look at how he dressed. He'd give /r/justneckbeardthings a fucking aneurysm.", '>>{987f} : Disgusting media companies profiting off of a witch hunt.', ">>{shshao} : Swamp... It's taken in a whole new meaning...", '>>{MortWellian} : He got his start doing dirty tricks under Nixon. The man has literally no shame.', ">>{OfficerPlonks} : Does anyone remember when Alex Jones and Roger Stone invaded the TYT set at the RNC? One of the most unbelievable things I've ever seen", '>>{lazydictionary} : He did an AMA on this very subreddit which devolved into personal attacks between him and the users. Mods actually had to remove a lot of his comments (and others) because things were escalating so quickly (and rule-breaking). https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5rvt51/im_roger_stone_political_insider_and_longtime/ You can see all his removed comments on his userpage. He might have deleted some other ones.', ">>{Minerva7} : He didn't look very happy when he brought out that cake. Put it on the table and left immediately.", ">>{dudeguypal} : Dude has a fucking tattoo of Richard Nixon's face on his back.", '>>{jakejames} : Great looking documentary called *"Get Me Roger Stone"* out on Netflix, May 12th: https://youtu.be/5IPyv4KgTAA', '>>{ccrmalite} : Check out the latest episode of Real Time with Bill Maher. He was on it this Friday.', ">>{floridalegend} : More purple need to take action and very involved for anything is to happen. Outrage isn't enough.", '>>{pushpin} : As another user asked in another thread: is it a witch hunt if you end up finding a witch?', '>>{isoundstrange} : Oh, you want to meet Roger Stone? [Here](https://youtu.be/lHbAsndSKXA?t=388) he is!', '>>{isoundstrange} : > More purple need to take action Exactly. Enough of the orange menace.', '>>{mf-TOM-HANK} : I noticed that, too. He walked away from that one-on-one with Bill very abruptly and looked like he had his tail between his legs when he brought the cake out.', '>>{SnapDeeTuck} : Roger Stone is on a big media push to sell his book, but MORE IMPORTANTLY to try to convince people of his innocence and Donald Trump\'s innocence when it comes to collusion with the Russians. He is the face of whataboutism. He is the face of "nothing to see here". He shouldn\'t be trusted. Not now, not ever.', '>>{SnapDeeTuck} : He was spewing his whataboutism and nothing to see here there, and anywhere else that will let him lately.', '>>{marcus_man_22} : to be fair, TYT handled that very badly as well', '>>{orlanderlv} : Did you see his hands during Bill Maher? The top half (top of palm up towards his fingers) of his hands were painted with that horrible bronzing tanner he uses. It looked like he had been back stage constantly wiping the sweat from his brow and the brown had stained his hands.', ">>{redditorandcheef} : It's funny I remember seeing Donald call him the biggest loser on earth a few years back, and stone didn't still didn't take trumps dick out of his own mouth after it.", ">>{BunsTown} : I hated seeing Maher go easy on him. Maher isn't a lawyer, but I saw a few ins Maher could have exploited during the interview. Stone seems like the worst of the worst. I wonder what Hayden was feeling that whole time.", ">>{BunsTown} : That's what a guilty man looks like. Hayden was looking right through him... and no doubt Hayden had a few old guard in tow with him in the green room. Can't believe I'm backing the IC so staunchly, but shit is real right now.", '>>{NeuronMaps} : Meet a Pulsating Pile Of Hot Garbage In July.', '>>{NeuronMaps} : Meet a Pulsating Pile Of Hot Garbage In July.', ">>{treerat} : Nixon will finally be going to jail, on Roger Stone's back.", ">>{celtic_thistle} : He's legitimately unhinged, and it shows when he interacts with people on social media.", ">>{troyanthony} : Your just upset because I'm the only guy you know with a dick on the front and the back. - Roger Stone", '>>{93_Vector} : I\'d never seen that before, but TYT really did. The second Jones gave up his microphone, I\'d have just taken the battery out of the bottom and stuffed it in the couch cushions. "Whoops, you\'re off the air now Alex. Sorry."', '>>{JohnGillnitz} : That was actually pretty funny. But, seriously, fuck Roger Stone.', '>>{JohnGillnitz} : He is desperate enough to go on Bill Maher. If I were his lawyer, I would quit after a stunt like that. He looked like a person who very much has something to hide acting like he has nothing to hide. WTF is it with authoritarians and bronzer? You would think with all the time they spend on the golf course, they could get a real tan.', ">>{Schohrf} : Oh yeah, that's the one where he described germany and europe as hellholes, overrun by raping and pillaging refugees (I am paraphrasing, his actual words were worse and are sadly still there). To this day it pisses me off that he was given a public platform by reddit.", ">>{GuyInAChair} : On *Pop Politics* this afternoon he repeatedly said the Russian election story is just an attempt to distract from Podesta's connection to the Kremlin.", '>>{awfulsome} : For how despicable Trump is, he has a knack for surrounding himself with people much worse. It is like he has the Legion of Doom on speed dial.', '>>{SnapDeeTuck} : He is on a media tour trying to convince everyone that this is all just normal shit and as usual the Clintons are way worse. Do not believe his lies.', '>>{ja734} : thats /r/iamversmart material if ive ever seen it.', ">>{theryanmoore} : Pissed me the fuck off too. I was banned from /r/politics for a WEEK just because I asked him if he had ever possessed a conscience. I get that we want other people to come do AMAs but this guy is the scum on the bottom of regular scum's shoe.", '>>{Trumpov} : Go team periwinkle! Better dead than an orange Red!', ">>{MWM2} : Man, I'm so sleepy today it must have taken me nearly five seconds to get the joke.", '>>{MWM2} : Maybe he\'s literally taken Trump\'s dick in his mouth. > Stone continued jumping between the campaign trails — for Pennsylvania Republican Arlen Specter and Kansas Republican Bob Dole — until he was kicked off Dole\'s presidential campaign after Stone and his wife were caught soliciting "similar couples or exceptional muscular" men for group sex. Stone denied the accusations at the time but later admitted they were accurate.', ">>{MWM2} : I didn't know about Stone's involvement in the Brooks Brothers riot. > In 2000 [Stone] was instrumental in orchestrating the so-called Brooks Brothers riot — a chaotic pro-Bush protest outside the Miami recount center — which helped shut down the Florida recount in the presidential election, securing George W. Bush's victory over Al Gore.", '>>{Scrimshawmud} : He seemed kind of jacked on that video. Pills?', '>>{Scrimshawmud} : Uber progressive here, feel the same way. Shit got weird.', '>>{captainn00dles} : Did you the interview on real time this week? Between him and Santorum the shit was getting deep.', '>>{BunsTown} : Yeah. No doubt there was some stuff going on behind the scenes there. No way NSA CIA guy is going to an appearance with a major scoundrel, without pushing him around a bit.', ">>{tokinbl} : >Stone has a tattoo of Nixon's face across his back and a large photograph of the former president over his bed. Suspect af", ">>{Schiffy94} : C'mon /u/Roger-Stone, let's see you deflect this one.", ">>{seventeenblackbirds} : Ok, so I've read Stone also tried to hook up with another couple to do some swinging. This story has now been inextricably linked in my mind to that tattoo, because I keep imagining being the one who takes him up on the swinging, then finds out about that. Like, you look over and he's taking off his shirt or going at it like a madman and you make direct eye contact with his tattoo of Richard Nixon. You realize, perhaps, that you have made a huge mistake. Perhaps you are in too deep. This may be a panorama that you cannot fully understand. You gaze at Richard Nixon, and so too does Richard Nixon gaze into you. You're welcome.", '>>{tokinbl} : I dont usually wish harm upon people but this man is the exception, holy shit could he be a bigger p.o.s.', '>>{mexicocitibluez} : His biggest defense was this article he said he wrote on Breitbart which is [fully debunked here](https://thinkprogress.org/roger-stones-alibi-falls-apart-a1c3cc0aaf7a).', ">>{morpheousmarty} : It's hard to do that kind of debate live, and he also had to resist getting truly pissed at him. But I agree Stone is the worst. He's like if t_d was a real person with a lifetime of political experience.", '>>{redditorandcheef} : It would not surprise me they probably pissed on one another, that seems to be dons kink.', '>>{MWM2} : > they probably pissed on one another *Lovely.* Somehow that thought didn\'t occur to me. "Okay, Donnie! Your turn to gargle!"', ">>{LillyPip} : Holy shit, that's a fascinating and disturbing read. I can't decide if he's outright lying, really believes what he says and is just that delusional, has convinced himself of alternate facts to make the money more palatable, or some combination of the above. I'm pretty sure whatever was left of his soul was excised under Nixon, though, judging by how much he fangirls over the guy. I honestly don't know how he and his cronies sleep at night, what with all the lies, hatred, backstabbing, and treason. Money's nice, but your dignity, humanity, and soul are a pretty steep price.", ">>{iswwitbrn} : > I hated seeing Maher go easy on him. Maher isn't a lawyer, but I saw a few ins Maher could have exploited during the interview. The two were practically chumming it over how much they hate Muslims and SJWs. Fuck that. Maher is basically Trump with a more economically liberal and slightly less anti-vaccine bent.", ">>{ElectricAccordian} : I remember when he said that we should be ok with him saying that Bernie Sanders should get shot because Stephan Colbert makes jokes and we like Stephan Colbert. Although I don't remember Colbert saying that we should be violent against political opponents...", ">>{fenrisulvur} : He has a flat head because his parents didn't correct it when he was a baby. https://www.google.is/search?q=flat+baby+head&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwipltvH94bTAhVFvBQKHXYwBd8Q_AUICCgB&biw=1187&bih=977", '>>{amputeenager} : I think this needs to be on a tombstone. Not mine. But someones.', ">>{MWM2} : So - you don't want to hear a Roger Stone rap about his ***deep*** love of scatology?", ">>{coffeespeaking} : > WTF is it with authoritarians and bronzer? Remember Romney on Univision? [Note the hands and face.](http://a.abcnews.com/images/ABC_Univision/UNI_romney_drugmexico_120920_wg.jpg) His face is part-Mexican, part Oompa Loompa. (It's a sociopath thing.)", ">>{MWM2} : *I have poop ev'ry day.* *I consume it ev'ry way.* *I call it PooStonin'.* *I love hot steaming poop slurpies.* *Hell yeah!* *Best from a tender virgin's butt.* *Who just has had Mexican food for lunch.* *Chunka-Chunk-Chunk.* *Are those refried beans?* *Yumma-yum-yum.* *Pour the urine ice all up in there.* *Slurp, slurp. Stick my tongue out...* *And make like an anteater.* *PooStonin'!* --- I wish there was a phrase that described the feeling you have when you've made yourself sick but you can't stop laughing at yourself.", '>>{PlayMp1} : Yeah, dude has a better sense of humor than I expected.', ">>{nickmortensen} : He's trying to channel Tom Wolfe. The novelist.", '>>{Dear_Occupant} : Going on Real Time had nothing to do with that though.', '>>{Meta0X} : * ...if t_d was a real person * ...with a lifetime of political experience. Pick one. Both simultaneously within the same being is impossible.', ">>{Scrimshawmud} : I want some inside info! Where's /u/billmaher??", '>>{zaviex} : He got ripped a few years back he likes to go shirtless now lol. He marched shirtless in a pride parade once even', ">>{Scrimshawmud} : Haha, I meant jacked like on speed. But hey, if he's into working out, at least there's one thing he likes that he can keep doing in prison!", ">>{griffeny} : Jesus, Bill Maher. What's the score now?", '>>{neurosisxeno} : After going on Real Time he was actually slated to speak at CPAC. What brought him down was with his popularity some teenage girl in Canada dug up some old clips of him and started spamming them on social media.', '>>{mthrfkn} : Bill Maher had nothing to do with that even though he loves to take credit.', ">>{seventeenblackbirds} : Probably mine. Ever since I had that thought, every time anyone mentions Roger Stone's Nixon tattoo, it haunts me. Might as well let it follow me to the grave.", ">>{mthrfkn} : And yet it was a video pulled by *a teenager who were watching videos old YouTube vids that brought down Milo. I think it's cute how much Maher and his fans credit him for this when it's not his to claim. Also he's an asshole.", ">>{baggysmills} : >It is your right as an American to peacefully assemble. Unfortunately, we are seeing more rioting than protesting lately. Sad! Wow, did Trump write that? >Nixon was among our greatest Presidents. Read my upcoming book Um.... >Where's the proof it's a lie, douchebag? What a douche.", ">>{llllIlllIllIlI} : I sort of like the theory that he's not actually involved in the collusion but that he is a braggart who *wants* to be and so he talks a big game... I mean who knows but it's entertaining to me at least...", ">>{celtic_thistle} : Well, if that's the case, hopefully his nasty little mouth gets him in trouble! :D", '>>{TheManWhoWasNotShort} : [Got me some of dat sweet, sweet karma posting it on AMA disasters though!] (https://www.reddit.com/r/AMADisasters/comments/5rvux5/this_is_a_bit_preemptive_but_theres_absolutely_no/) Lol', ">>{mthrfkn} : He's an asshole, he had no role in exposing Milo. If a teenager hadn't exposed Milo, this would have backfired on Maher. Fuck him.", ">>{rillo561} : Roger was talking in circles on Maher's show. Such a weasel", ">>{mthrfkn} : She's completely important, Bill was being crucified for brining on Milo. He's so lucky that a teenager had enough balls to get it right.", ">>{carl_888} : Stone has been active in the Washington swinging scene for decades, this [first became public in 1996](http://www.democraticunderground.com/images/homepage/stone_enquirer_inside.gif) via The National Enquirer when he was working for Bob Dole's campaign.", ">>{drewjitzu} : Yeah I was really disappointed that Jimmy Dore spit his drink at Jones and didn't even own up to it or apologize. He didn't get suspended or anything either as far as I know.", '>>{Minerva7} : Bill Maher had Roger bring out a Marijuana cake mid-way through the episode and Mr. Stone did not look like he appreciated it very much.', ">>{FizzleMateriel} : Fucking hell, you weren't kidding. What the hell was he thinking?", ">>{CrypticRandom} : To be fair, most historical witch hunts did end up finding witches, it's just that our definition of what constitutes a witch has shifted since then.", '>>{coolcris} : He also appeared on Vice News. Denies all allegations, but his body language heavily indicated that he was guilty as fuck.', ">>{987f} : Every witch hunt thinks they find a witch. That's the point of calling it a witch hunt.", ">>{coffeespeaking} : He was trying to woo the Latino vote. (Univision is a Latino channel.) Mitt was born of American parents in Mexico...which makes him part Mexican, in his mind. Still, what I wouldn't do for Mittens in the White House right now. Better a President who claims to be Mexican when he isn't than the asshat xenophobe we got instead.", '>>{morpheousmarty} : Fair enough, the trollish half truth nature of t_d with the experience to truly weaponize it.']]

classify and reply

[">>{WildAnimus} : Hillary Clinton 'Will Hold Press Conferences' as President, Press Secretary Vows", ">>{dobolina} : Donald Trump's Son & Campaign Manager Both Tweet Obviously Fake Story", '>>{drewiepoodle} : Transgender Man Sues Gov. Mike Pence And Other Indiana Officials. A Mexican immigrant who was granted asylum in the United States, the plaintiff alleges the state commits constitutional violations by enforcing a law that bars noncitizens from changing their legal name.', '>>{JacobCrim88} : the ".co" gives it away. Geezus they really need to learn how to use the cyber.', '>>{more_sarcasm} : >Brian Fallon, vows that if elected, “Hillary Clinton will hold press conferences.” but not before... so if you have questions you want answered, you will have to vote for her to make sure she becomes president. Otherwise, ***NO PRESS CONFERENCE!!!*** >“The amount of interaction can only go up," Fallon said, noting that the traveling press will soon be flying with Clinton on her new campaign plane. well, 1 is more than none...', ">>{Mumakata} : Yeah, you have to elect her to find out what's in her lizard queen brain. Seems like we've heard that shit before.", ">>{treerat} : Maybe they'll acid wash the story. Its very expensive to do though.", ">>{salmonchaser} : As I've been saying a lot, Kellyanne Conway is not good at her job.", '>>{DrunkenGenie} : This just points out the Trump cant even run a campaign, let alone a business or country. A real campaign would have staff to check this shit before it is posted.', '>>{NoNewsizBadnews} : But but but Trump/Pence stands with the LGBT community! This must be a mistake! They allowed a gay man to speak at the RNC.', '>>{_Quetzalcoatlus_} : From the made up article: >“I knew those weren’t real protesters, they were too organized and smart,” said 59-year-old Tom Downey, a Trump supporter who attended the rally in Fountain Hills. “I knew there was something up when they started shouting all these facts and nonsense like that. The best we could do was just yell and punch em’ and stuff.” Downey continued Fucking lol. Probably says something about how you view your supporters when you read this and think "yup! Sounds legit!"', '>>{MrDerpyPanda} : Those links are not clickable, just letting you know', ">>{_Quetzalcoatlus_} : To be fair, it's maybe the most difficult job in the world right now. Can you imagine having to wake up every morning and trying to figure out how to defend Trump's statements and actions? That would just wear you down. I think just lasting this long is quite the accomplishment. It will be an astonishing achievement if she can last until election day on Nov. 28th ^(Edit: to be clear, I'm not actually defending her. I was just making a joke about how shitty and nerve-wracking that job would be)", ">>{salmonchaser} : She sets herself up to look like an idiot. I get that it's hard, but she's staying on and she herself becomes part of the story of idiocy with the things that she says on the news shows. If she was unflappable and consistent, I wouldn't be calling her an idiot. She's a joke.", '>>{Egorse} : Did those two even read the fake article before they tweeted it', '>>{SaberHamLincoln} : Damn thanks, they were on my phone. How about now?', ">>{MrDerpyPanda} : Working now! And woah that's about the biggest difference I've seen, I suppose most comparisons compare the 6s plus to the 7/7 plus though", ">>{Yolo20152016} : So, he is not a citizen and wants citizen rights? Become a citizen and you'll have them, otherwise GTFO.", ">>{c0ded_truth} : I've seen other comparisons, but this is by far the most drastic one. Same lighting conditions for both? I'm not calling you out for lying or anything, but it's incredible how much of a difference there is.", ">>{iammodbox} : That's because the 6S does not have OIS, where the 7 does... Compare the Plus models and the image will be the same.", '>>{thegoodvibe} : Or go to the debates? Those also have questions.', '>>{it_is_not_science} : >Stories like this have helped put my children through college, buy a new car, a home and even get the Silverback gorilla my wife Barbara always wanted since she was a child,” Mikkleson said. No doubt a wink towards Harambe. Fucking hell, I applaud the writer of this fake new story for casting their little line out and reeling in a U.S. Presidential campaign. Not that the Trump campaign is capable of feeling embarrassment, but this demonstrates their eagerness to push a narrative without any duty to think critically or verify.', '>>{thegreatdespiser} : Some people have said that Donald wears mom jeans.', '>>{President_Shitlord} : Like the alt-right gives a shit. They love this irrational crap and it will soon be "fact" in their bubble.', ">>{RajivFernanDatBribe} : And yet the Democrats scoff at me for claiming Americans should have the same health care as they have in the good European countries. I wonder if the NHS will pay for my health care even though I'm not in England.", ">>{drewiepoodle} : So a person that has been granted asylum isnt allowed the simple courtesy of changing their name? In order to be granted asylum, you have to go through a rigorous background check, fingerprints on file with the fbi. A change of name like that which you get after marriage is a simple form submission. A gender change requires an additional court order. It's a matter of process, not rights. Your argument doesnt hold any water. Try a different xenophobic argument. Source: Am trans and an immigrant and has had name and gender changed with the USCIS", ">>{moxiebaseball} : I think she's actually really good at what she does. She has one of the worst clients and for a period of time got him to stay within striking distance of actually winning. Also she can spin better than I have seen for any surrogate in either campaign.", ">>{moxiebaseball} : SNL had a skit last week about Conway's day off.", '>>{drewiepoodle} : Pence has NEVER stood with the LGBT community, he was the first to engage in the colossal clusterfuck of a RFRA law. He signed it with all the religious leaders behind him. Then he was surprised at the backlash from the business community. And unlike McRory in North Carolina, he chickened out and gutted the law, thereby pissing off the religious bigots that helped draft the law.', ">>{10390} : How crazy is it that we're about to elect as president someone who won't talk with the public unless there's a script?", '>>{jackattacck} : I doubt it would be the same. The 7 plus has a 1.8 max aperture which is almost a full stop wider than the 2.2 in the 6s plus. The difference would probably be less drastic but there would be a difference.', '>>{salmonchaser} : She, in the last week, has made mistakes that make HER the story. Like how she posted those tweets about believing all sexual assault victims after her client had been on tape talking about sexually assaulting women. She spins and spins and spins and just comes off as a liar. She speaks in a very polished way but she does not get the job done.', ">>{ElanX} : Much better, although both still pretty bad. (Also, assuming the TV screen wasn't just brighter.)", ">>{10390} : Because irony. No open discussion until after it's too late.", ">>{Yolo20152016} : Oh cut the xenophobic and anti- transgender crap. It's a matter of sorting out citizenship and getting to become a US citizen first then getting your name changed and sex and whatever else you want to do. Is it really that important to change your name when you aren't even a full citizen yet? In many countries you can't even be gay without facing death penalties. God forbid a state asks someone to become a US citizen before legally changing their name. So, you are right it is process and not rights. Become a US citizen and name yourself Panda Bear, sexually identity as a leopard and build a rainbow colored gingerbread house for all I care. It's your right to do so, but follow the process first.", '>>{drewiepoodle} : > Is it really that important to change your name when you aren\'t even a full citizen yet? To a trans person? Yup. It shows that in THIS country, we can be who we really are. That name and gender on your identification means everything. >In many countries you can\'t even be gay without facing death penalties. Yes, but not in this country. >God forbid a state asks someone to become a US citizen before legally changing their name. It takes years to become a citizen. Again, it\'s a matter of process. It was one of the first things i did after i came out. >sexually identity as a leopard That\'s not an orientation >It\'s your right to do so, but follow the process first. Instructions for USCIS Form i-90 - Instructions for Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card Item Number 4. Has your name legally changed since the issuance of your Permanent Resident Card? Select the appropriate box If your name has changed since the issuance of your Permanent Resident Card, select "Yes" and proceed to Item Numbers 5.a. - 5.c. If your name was legally changed to another name, you must submit appropriate legal documents that reflect the name change (for example a registered copy of your marriage certificate, divorce decree, adoption decree, or other court issued document showing your name was legally changed). Legal name change documents submitted as evidence of a name change must have been registered with the proper civil authority Try again with a different xenophobic argument.', '>>{SaberHamLincoln} : I think the plus is too big, as do many others. So a comparison between phones that we would choose is better than a comparison of phones we would not.', '>>{Yolo20152016} : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_change States control name changes. You want to know what I have a problem with? It\'s not immigration or immigrants. It\'s the attitude that we owe you something and that if we disagree with one thing, you throw out statements like "xenophobe" or "racist" or even in your case I am probably "trans-oh-pobe" or some other bs. I welcome people looking to start a better life and I love hard working immigrants who come here and become successful. That\'s what\'s America is all about. But don\'t come here acting like we better do as you say or bend over backwards and sideways to make sure people get equal rights when they aren\'t even a full citizen or even worse here illegally. We have veterans who are dying in waiting rooms waiting days and weeks to see doctors. These people gave their soul to this country and they get treated like shit. Meanwhile, this guy who was given a way out and a chance to chase the American is bitching and suing because he has to wait to change his name.', '>>{drewiepoodle} : Xenophobic because you seem to have a grudge against immigrants. Again, if asylum has been granted, and you are in the system with USCIS, there is a process for changing your name on your application I know this because I did this. For a state to restrict a name change when the Federal government has a clear process for it is unconstitutional. duh. Now try a different xenophobic argument.', ">>{Yolo20152016} : The states have their own laws and they work in certain ways and that is not unconstitutional to block a name change that is set by a federal agencies policies. They don't have a SSC so SS laws would not apply. This isn't a 14th amendment applied situation. This is a state law and not a federal one. Look, I am glad you made it through the process and enjoy the wonders of America and the rights and protections that go along with it. I am glad you can live your life in the sex that you believe you are. I am glad that we provide an opportunity for you to freely express who you really are and not be punished for it. However, it is not a grudge against immigrants and it is not xenophobic to feel that America needs to jump right away and bow down for every little social justice issue for non-citizens. We have enough issues helping out our current citizens. Stop throwing statements out such xenophobe because you are drawing attention away from actual people who actually have deep rooted hatred with immigrants. People are going to grow tired of the boy who cried wolf and not care anymore.", '>>{moxiebaseball} : Agreed. When you have a campaign that is mostly lies and spin, this becomes difficult. She is much more effective than Giulianni or Petersen.', ">>{leontes} : you think a president has nothing to explain to the nation about governance, plans, and international events? Much more than a candidate would. Press conference are a must for a president. Very unusual not to hold them, as a candidate, though, but as a president? Wouldn't make sense at all.", ">>{thebuggalo} : Gotta be honest, the 7 still has a lot of noise it's just lighter. It actually feels like the 6s captures the actual mode of the room a lot better, while the 7 just seems to blow out the highlights to make it brighter. To my eye they have the same level of noise though.", ">>{TakeBack_Democracy} : JUST FUCKING VOTE ME IN ALREADY DAMMIT! THEN I'LL GIVE YOU PEONS YOUR STUPID PRESS CONFERENCES! But don't you dare ask about my ideas before you vote for me! - Clinton 2016", '>>{drewiepoodle} : > The states have their own laws And in California, all it required was a court order. and states rights only go so far as long as they do not impose an undue burden, which Indiana clearly does. And this isnt true for just immigrants, it is true for all trans people in the state.', '>>{Tori1313} : If you vote for me I will do things I should have been doing for over a year on the campaign trail "She\'s the best candidate, so transparent, I\'m with her" /s', ">>{Flacvest} : Did you manually set the exposure to be identical between both phones? Because software could just cause the 7 to crank up the shutter speed and ISO to compensate more heavily. To actually make a comparison here, make sure you click the same location for focus and exposure, then manually adjust to the same brightness. Then take the shot. Otherwise you aren't really comparing anything, especially not overall picture quality.", ">>{IrishJoe} : Here it is: [Kellyanne's Day Off](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zjbc15X1zSM)", ">>{Yolo20152016} : Indiana has no undue burden it is actually very simple. To obtain a legal name change in Indiana, an applicant must submit a petition to the court. The applicant must publish notice of the petition in the newspaper for three weeks and the last week’s publication should be at least 30 days before the hearing. The applicant should file a copy of the published name change notice verified by affidavit of a disinterested person. Individuals who are currently confined in a Department of Corrections facility cannot receive a name change, and individuals who are not currently incarcerated but have a felony conviction within the last ten years have additional notification requirements. (Ind. Code Ann. §§ 34-28-2-1 to 34-28-2-4). www.transequality.org/documents/state/indiana It's the fact, that he isn't a citizen and he should spend his money a immigration lawyer because he should easily become a citizen. Idk, why he hasn't done so yet he has been here since the 90's. Seems like there is more to this story. Like why is he still a non-citizen and why hasn't he got a lawyer after 20 years or so of being here.", ">>{drewiepoodle} : Lol, because life happens. His story isnt so different than mine, save for the asylum part. I've had so many different visas, that i've lost count. The only difference is that my skin isnt brown. Talking to some mexicans and what they had to go thru, my interviews were a breeze compared to them.", ">>{10390} : It's too late to not make them president at that point, which is arguably more important.", ">>{MrInRageous} : Do I need to point out that what this person says to the American public means nothing? This woman looks right into the camera and lies. This is why honesty matters. It doesn't mean anything that she will give press conferences. The ONLY thing that's meaningful is that she hasn't done them.", '>>{manzoire} : *Only one, on her last day. Technically true, thats the clinton way', ">>{introversed} : Well, duh. She's have nothing to lose by that point.", ">>{10390} : Wow, you're right. They'll be like the news announcer who just reads what others write.", ">>{IDFSHILL} : Who cares if she's a liar, Trump lies far more often, so why is it relevant?", '>>{Schwa142} : That\'s an interesting platform to run on... \'As President, I promise to hold press conferences."', ">>{TheGreatSilence} : You're wondering what's wrong with lying? I mean... that's just... ok, how about you [read this article](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics) to start with and then let me know if you have any more questions.", ">>{NarcolepticMan} : You can't justify her actions without using Trump as a defense can you?", ">>{MrInRageous} : The relevancy is that we'll have a president who we can't trust. It's one thing to support her because of disliking Trump more. What alarms me are the people who advocate for her regardless. By electing her, we'll be avoiding Trump, but still be gaining a liar.", ">>{MrInRageous} : I can't recall having a conversation with any Hillary supporter who hasn't invoked Trump. It always comes down to a strategy of fear.", '>>{Homeoftheblizzard} : (They can\'t) It\'s because *that\'s* their entire strategy. The Clinton campaign uses fear of "the other" as the principle reason for support. It doesn\'t matter if it was Ted \'the zodiac killer\' Cruz, !!Jeb!!!, or anyone who stands in the way. They would make a meme out of it and claim *it* invalid.', ">>{GaryRuppert} : She'll hold press conferences right after she looks into releasing the speech transcripts", '>>{Maculate} : Our bar is kind of low right now. Two requirements: 1) Don\'t Be Trump 2) Hold One Press Conference while president. I think Hil could literally say that is all she is going to do and 100% of HRC supporters would gleefully shout, "Still better than Trump!"', ">>{MrInRageous} : It's my new challenge when on r/politics. I'll be looking for the first Hillary supporter I find who actually uses this line as a reason to vote for her. The sad part is I'm *certain* I'll find someone soon.", '>>{Maculate} : You are forgetting re-election. Fallon never said it would be in her first term.', ">>{muxman} : Completely correct. They can't win anything by saying Clinton is this or has done this, only Trump's worse. Vote for Clinton, because you deserve *not the worst* America has to offer.", '>>{6sicksticks} : Conference*s*. She will hold two, back to back.', '>>{manzoire} : With an hour intermission, at 3 in the morning', ">>{6sicksticks} : Ten years out of office while she's technically the President of the local shuffleboard club at her retirement home.", '>>{TheOligarchsStoleIt} : Its like a headline out of the onion, but real. America, how did we nominate this person?', ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : Once the stakes are significantly lower for her, she'll hold press conferences. Oh how I can't stand you Hillary.", ">>{IDFSHILL} : That's literally the only defense required, because he's the only other choice.", ">>{IDFSHILL} : You're very seriously exaggerating the rate at which Clinton lies. She isn't even in the same solar system as Trump.", '>>{IDFSHILL} : OH GOD, NOT ETHICS, OH GOD OH GOD. Whatever will we do, Clinton lied about some emails because she did the same thing the rest of the government was doing. HOW **UNETHICAL!!**', ">>{TheGreatSilence} : Ok, so you do probably understand right from wrong, you just don't care.", '>>{MrInRageous} : I disagree. The woman has a problem telling the truth. Look, I get you don\'t want Trump. I think there\'s a difference in voting for Hillary because you don\'t like Trump. What I don\'t get are all the people claiming to support her. This is a tremendously flawed candidate who has profound integrity issues, and also seems to have memory problems and judgment concerns--as evidenced by this whole email fiasco. I mean, really, you\'re gonna tell me with straight face you think Clinton didn\'t know what "c" suggested?', '>>{MysticRay} : This is the purest form of Hillary support right here. Throwing away all sense of integrity for what? A win? And a typical lie thrown in there too. No, no one else had ever kept a private homebrew server at their house to do their work on.', '>>{NarcolepticMan} : No. There are other people you can vote for. If you vote for "the alternative" you are giving into fear mongering.', '>>{bruti561} : No. On a different channel during the Super Bowl .', ">>{IDFSHILL} : No thanks, I live in the adult world where voting for a 3rd party is a wasted vote and handing the government to bat-shit crazy conservatives. I'm not an 18 year old kid that has no idea how politics work.", ">>{djfacebooth} : We take you at your word(We don't)", '>>{MysticRay} : Yet she still found a way to handle it sloppier than anyone else. Terrible defense on multiple levels.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{MrDerpyPanda} : Those links are not clickable, just letting you know', '>>{SaberHamLincoln} : Damn thanks, they were on my phone. How about now?', ">>{MrDerpyPanda} : Working now! And woah that's about the biggest difference I've seen, I suppose most comparisons compare the 6s plus to the 7/7 plus though", ">>{c0ded_truth} : I've seen other comparisons, but this is by far the most drastic one. Same lighting conditions for both? I'm not calling you out for lying or anything, but it's incredible how much of a difference there is.", ">>{iammodbox} : That's because the 6S does not have OIS, where the 7 does... Compare the Plus models and the image will be the same.", '>>{jackattacck} : I doubt it would be the same. The 7 plus has a 1.8 max aperture which is almost a full stop wider than the 2.2 in the 6s plus. The difference would probably be less drastic but there would be a difference.', ">>{ElanX} : Much better, although both still pretty bad. (Also, assuming the TV screen wasn't just brighter.)", '>>{SaberHamLincoln} : I think the plus is too big, as do many others. So a comparison between phones that we would choose is better than a comparison of phones we would not.', ">>{thebuggalo} : Gotta be honest, the 7 still has a lot of noise it's just lighter. It actually feels like the 6s captures the actual mode of the room a lot better, while the 7 just seems to blow out the highlights to make it brighter. To my eye they have the same level of noise though.", ">>{Flacvest} : Did you manually set the exposure to be identical between both phones? Because software could just cause the 7 to crank up the shutter speed and ISO to compensate more heavily. To actually make a comparison here, make sure you click the same location for focus and exposure, then manually adjust to the same brightness. Then take the shot. Otherwise you aren't really comparing anything, especially not overall picture quality."], [">>{dobolina} : Donald Trump's Son & Campaign Manager Both Tweet Obviously Fake Story", '>>{JacobCrim88} : the ".co" gives it away. Geezus they really need to learn how to use the cyber.', ">>{treerat} : Maybe they'll acid wash the story. Its very expensive to do though.", ">>{salmonchaser} : As I've been saying a lot, Kellyanne Conway is not good at her job.", '>>{DrunkenGenie} : This just points out the Trump cant even run a campaign, let alone a business or country. A real campaign would have staff to check this shit before it is posted.', '>>{_Quetzalcoatlus_} : From the made up article: >“I knew those weren’t real protesters, they were too organized and smart,” said 59-year-old Tom Downey, a Trump supporter who attended the rally in Fountain Hills. “I knew there was something up when they started shouting all these facts and nonsense like that. The best we could do was just yell and punch em’ and stuff.” Downey continued Fucking lol. Probably says something about how you view your supporters when you read this and think "yup! Sounds legit!"', ">>{_Quetzalcoatlus_} : To be fair, it's maybe the most difficult job in the world right now. Can you imagine having to wake up every morning and trying to figure out how to defend Trump's statements and actions? That would just wear you down. I think just lasting this long is quite the accomplishment. It will be an astonishing achievement if she can last until election day on Nov. 28th ^(Edit: to be clear, I'm not actually defending her. I was just making a joke about how shitty and nerve-wracking that job would be)", ">>{salmonchaser} : She sets herself up to look like an idiot. I get that it's hard, but she's staying on and she herself becomes part of the story of idiocy with the things that she says on the news shows. If she was unflappable and consistent, I wouldn't be calling her an idiot. She's a joke.", '>>{Egorse} : Did those two even read the fake article before they tweeted it', '>>{it_is_not_science} : >Stories like this have helped put my children through college, buy a new car, a home and even get the Silverback gorilla my wife Barbara always wanted since she was a child,” Mikkleson said. No doubt a wink towards Harambe. Fucking hell, I applaud the writer of this fake new story for casting their little line out and reeling in a U.S. Presidential campaign. Not that the Trump campaign is capable of feeling embarrassment, but this demonstrates their eagerness to push a narrative without any duty to think critically or verify.', '>>{thegreatdespiser} : Some people have said that Donald wears mom jeans.', '>>{President_Shitlord} : Like the alt-right gives a shit. They love this irrational crap and it will soon be "fact" in their bubble.', ">>{moxiebaseball} : I think she's actually really good at what she does. She has one of the worst clients and for a period of time got him to stay within striking distance of actually winning. Also she can spin better than I have seen for any surrogate in either campaign.", ">>{moxiebaseball} : SNL had a skit last week about Conway's day off.", '>>{salmonchaser} : She, in the last week, has made mistakes that make HER the story. Like how she posted those tweets about believing all sexual assault victims after her client had been on tape talking about sexually assaulting women. She spins and spins and spins and just comes off as a liar. She speaks in a very polished way but she does not get the job done.', '>>{moxiebaseball} : Agreed. When you have a campaign that is mostly lies and spin, this becomes difficult. She is much more effective than Giulianni or Petersen.', ">>{IrishJoe} : Here it is: [Kellyanne's Day Off](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zjbc15X1zSM)"], ['>>{drewiepoodle} : Transgender Man Sues Gov. Mike Pence And Other Indiana Officials. A Mexican immigrant who was granted asylum in the United States, the plaintiff alleges the state commits constitutional violations by enforcing a law that bars noncitizens from changing their legal name.', '>>{NoNewsizBadnews} : But but but Trump/Pence stands with the LGBT community! This must be a mistake! They allowed a gay man to speak at the RNC.', ">>{Yolo20152016} : So, he is not a citizen and wants citizen rights? Become a citizen and you'll have them, otherwise GTFO.", ">>{RajivFernanDatBribe} : And yet the Democrats scoff at me for claiming Americans should have the same health care as they have in the good European countries. I wonder if the NHS will pay for my health care even though I'm not in England.", ">>{drewiepoodle} : So a person that has been granted asylum isnt allowed the simple courtesy of changing their name? In order to be granted asylum, you have to go through a rigorous background check, fingerprints on file with the fbi. A change of name like that which you get after marriage is a simple form submission. A gender change requires an additional court order. It's a matter of process, not rights. Your argument doesnt hold any water. Try a different xenophobic argument. Source: Am trans and an immigrant and has had name and gender changed with the USCIS", '>>{drewiepoodle} : Pence has NEVER stood with the LGBT community, he was the first to engage in the colossal clusterfuck of a RFRA law. He signed it with all the religious leaders behind him. Then he was surprised at the backlash from the business community. And unlike McRory in North Carolina, he chickened out and gutted the law, thereby pissing off the religious bigots that helped draft the law.', ">>{Yolo20152016} : Oh cut the xenophobic and anti- transgender crap. It's a matter of sorting out citizenship and getting to become a US citizen first then getting your name changed and sex and whatever else you want to do. Is it really that important to change your name when you aren't even a full citizen yet? In many countries you can't even be gay without facing death penalties. God forbid a state asks someone to become a US citizen before legally changing their name. So, you are right it is process and not rights. Become a US citizen and name yourself Panda Bear, sexually identity as a leopard and build a rainbow colored gingerbread house for all I care. It's your right to do so, but follow the process first.", '>>{drewiepoodle} : > Is it really that important to change your name when you aren\'t even a full citizen yet? To a trans person? Yup. It shows that in THIS country, we can be who we really are. That name and gender on your identification means everything. >In many countries you can\'t even be gay without facing death penalties. Yes, but not in this country. >God forbid a state asks someone to become a US citizen before legally changing their name. It takes years to become a citizen. Again, it\'s a matter of process. It was one of the first things i did after i came out. >sexually identity as a leopard That\'s not an orientation >It\'s your right to do so, but follow the process first. Instructions for USCIS Form i-90 - Instructions for Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card Item Number 4. Has your name legally changed since the issuance of your Permanent Resident Card? Select the appropriate box If your name has changed since the issuance of your Permanent Resident Card, select "Yes" and proceed to Item Numbers 5.a. - 5.c. If your name was legally changed to another name, you must submit appropriate legal documents that reflect the name change (for example a registered copy of your marriage certificate, divorce decree, adoption decree, or other court issued document showing your name was legally changed). Legal name change documents submitted as evidence of a name change must have been registered with the proper civil authority Try again with a different xenophobic argument.', '>>{Yolo20152016} : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_change States control name changes. You want to know what I have a problem with? It\'s not immigration or immigrants. It\'s the attitude that we owe you something and that if we disagree with one thing, you throw out statements like "xenophobe" or "racist" or even in your case I am probably "trans-oh-pobe" or some other bs. I welcome people looking to start a better life and I love hard working immigrants who come here and become successful. That\'s what\'s America is all about. But don\'t come here acting like we better do as you say or bend over backwards and sideways to make sure people get equal rights when they aren\'t even a full citizen or even worse here illegally. We have veterans who are dying in waiting rooms waiting days and weeks to see doctors. These people gave their soul to this country and they get treated like shit. Meanwhile, this guy who was given a way out and a chance to chase the American is bitching and suing because he has to wait to change his name.', '>>{drewiepoodle} : Xenophobic because you seem to have a grudge against immigrants. Again, if asylum has been granted, and you are in the system with USCIS, there is a process for changing your name on your application I know this because I did this. For a state to restrict a name change when the Federal government has a clear process for it is unconstitutional. duh. Now try a different xenophobic argument.', ">>{Yolo20152016} : The states have their own laws and they work in certain ways and that is not unconstitutional to block a name change that is set by a federal agencies policies. They don't have a SSC so SS laws would not apply. This isn't a 14th amendment applied situation. This is a state law and not a federal one. Look, I am glad you made it through the process and enjoy the wonders of America and the rights and protections that go along with it. I am glad you can live your life in the sex that you believe you are. I am glad that we provide an opportunity for you to freely express who you really are and not be punished for it. However, it is not a grudge against immigrants and it is not xenophobic to feel that America needs to jump right away and bow down for every little social justice issue for non-citizens. We have enough issues helping out our current citizens. Stop throwing statements out such xenophobe because you are drawing attention away from actual people who actually have deep rooted hatred with immigrants. People are going to grow tired of the boy who cried wolf and not care anymore.", '>>{drewiepoodle} : > The states have their own laws And in California, all it required was a court order. and states rights only go so far as long as they do not impose an undue burden, which Indiana clearly does. And this isnt true for just immigrants, it is true for all trans people in the state.', ">>{Yolo20152016} : Indiana has no undue burden it is actually very simple. To obtain a legal name change in Indiana, an applicant must submit a petition to the court. The applicant must publish notice of the petition in the newspaper for three weeks and the last week’s publication should be at least 30 days before the hearing. The applicant should file a copy of the published name change notice verified by affidavit of a disinterested person. Individuals who are currently confined in a Department of Corrections facility cannot receive a name change, and individuals who are not currently incarcerated but have a felony conviction within the last ten years have additional notification requirements. (Ind. Code Ann. §§ 34-28-2-1 to 34-28-2-4). www.transequality.org/documents/state/indiana It's the fact, that he isn't a citizen and he should spend his money a immigration lawyer because he should easily become a citizen. Idk, why he hasn't done so yet he has been here since the 90's. Seems like there is more to this story. Like why is he still a non-citizen and why hasn't he got a lawyer after 20 years or so of being here.", ">>{drewiepoodle} : Lol, because life happens. His story isnt so different than mine, save for the asylum part. I've had so many different visas, that i've lost count. The only difference is that my skin isnt brown. Talking to some mexicans and what they had to go thru, my interviews were a breeze compared to them."], [">>{WildAnimus} : Hillary Clinton 'Will Hold Press Conferences' as President, Press Secretary Vows", '>>{more_sarcasm} : >Brian Fallon, vows that if elected, “Hillary Clinton will hold press conferences.” but not before... so if you have questions you want answered, you will have to vote for her to make sure she becomes president. Otherwise, ***NO PRESS CONFERENCE!!!*** >“The amount of interaction can only go up," Fallon said, noting that the traveling press will soon be flying with Clinton on her new campaign plane. well, 1 is more than none...', ">>{Mumakata} : Yeah, you have to elect her to find out what's in her lizard queen brain. Seems like we've heard that shit before.", '>>{thegoodvibe} : Or go to the debates? Those also have questions.', ">>{10390} : How crazy is it that we're about to elect as president someone who won't talk with the public unless there's a script?", ">>{10390} : Because irony. No open discussion until after it's too late.", ">>{leontes} : you think a president has nothing to explain to the nation about governance, plans, and international events? Much more than a candidate would. Press conference are a must for a president. Very unusual not to hold them, as a candidate, though, but as a president? Wouldn't make sense at all.", ">>{TakeBack_Democracy} : JUST FUCKING VOTE ME IN ALREADY DAMMIT! THEN I'LL GIVE YOU PEONS YOUR STUPID PRESS CONFERENCES! But don't you dare ask about my ideas before you vote for me! - Clinton 2016", '>>{Tori1313} : If you vote for me I will do things I should have been doing for over a year on the campaign trail "She\'s the best candidate, so transparent, I\'m with her" /s', ">>{10390} : It's too late to not make them president at that point, which is arguably more important.", ">>{MrInRageous} : Do I need to point out that what this person says to the American public means nothing? This woman looks right into the camera and lies. This is why honesty matters. It doesn't mean anything that she will give press conferences. The ONLY thing that's meaningful is that she hasn't done them.", '>>{manzoire} : *Only one, on her last day. Technically true, thats the clinton way', ">>{introversed} : Well, duh. She's have nothing to lose by that point.", ">>{10390} : Wow, you're right. They'll be like the news announcer who just reads what others write.", ">>{IDFSHILL} : Who cares if she's a liar, Trump lies far more often, so why is it relevant?", '>>{Schwa142} : That\'s an interesting platform to run on... \'As President, I promise to hold press conferences."', ">>{TheGreatSilence} : You're wondering what's wrong with lying? I mean... that's just... ok, how about you [read this article](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics) to start with and then let me know if you have any more questions.", ">>{NarcolepticMan} : You can't justify her actions without using Trump as a defense can you?", ">>{MrInRageous} : The relevancy is that we'll have a president who we can't trust. It's one thing to support her because of disliking Trump more. What alarms me are the people who advocate for her regardless. By electing her, we'll be avoiding Trump, but still be gaining a liar.", ">>{MrInRageous} : I can't recall having a conversation with any Hillary supporter who hasn't invoked Trump. It always comes down to a strategy of fear.", '>>{Homeoftheblizzard} : (They can\'t) It\'s because *that\'s* their entire strategy. The Clinton campaign uses fear of "the other" as the principle reason for support. It doesn\'t matter if it was Ted \'the zodiac killer\' Cruz, !!Jeb!!!, or anyone who stands in the way. They would make a meme out of it and claim *it* invalid.', ">>{GaryRuppert} : She'll hold press conferences right after she looks into releasing the speech transcripts", '>>{Maculate} : Our bar is kind of low right now. Two requirements: 1) Don\'t Be Trump 2) Hold One Press Conference while president. I think Hil could literally say that is all she is going to do and 100% of HRC supporters would gleefully shout, "Still better than Trump!"', ">>{MrInRageous} : It's my new challenge when on r/politics. I'll be looking for the first Hillary supporter I find who actually uses this line as a reason to vote for her. The sad part is I'm *certain* I'll find someone soon.", '>>{Maculate} : You are forgetting re-election. Fallon never said it would be in her first term.', ">>{muxman} : Completely correct. They can't win anything by saying Clinton is this or has done this, only Trump's worse. Vote for Clinton, because you deserve *not the worst* America has to offer.", '>>{6sicksticks} : Conference*s*. She will hold two, back to back.', '>>{manzoire} : With an hour intermission, at 3 in the morning', ">>{6sicksticks} : Ten years out of office while she's technically the President of the local shuffleboard club at her retirement home.", '>>{TheOligarchsStoleIt} : Its like a headline out of the onion, but real. America, how did we nominate this person?', ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : Once the stakes are significantly lower for her, she'll hold press conferences. Oh how I can't stand you Hillary.", ">>{IDFSHILL} : That's literally the only defense required, because he's the only other choice.", ">>{IDFSHILL} : You're very seriously exaggerating the rate at which Clinton lies. She isn't even in the same solar system as Trump.", '>>{IDFSHILL} : OH GOD, NOT ETHICS, OH GOD OH GOD. Whatever will we do, Clinton lied about some emails because she did the same thing the rest of the government was doing. HOW **UNETHICAL!!**', ">>{TheGreatSilence} : Ok, so you do probably understand right from wrong, you just don't care.", '>>{MrInRageous} : I disagree. The woman has a problem telling the truth. Look, I get you don\'t want Trump. I think there\'s a difference in voting for Hillary because you don\'t like Trump. What I don\'t get are all the people claiming to support her. This is a tremendously flawed candidate who has profound integrity issues, and also seems to have memory problems and judgment concerns--as evidenced by this whole email fiasco. I mean, really, you\'re gonna tell me with straight face you think Clinton didn\'t know what "c" suggested?', '>>{MysticRay} : This is the purest form of Hillary support right here. Throwing away all sense of integrity for what? A win? And a typical lie thrown in there too. No, no one else had ever kept a private homebrew server at their house to do their work on.', '>>{NarcolepticMan} : No. There are other people you can vote for. If you vote for "the alternative" you are giving into fear mongering.', '>>{bruti561} : No. On a different channel during the Super Bowl .', ">>{IDFSHILL} : No thanks, I live in the adult world where voting for a 3rd party is a wasted vote and handing the government to bat-shit crazy conservatives. I'm not an 18 year old kid that has no idea how politics work.", ">>{djfacebooth} : We take you at your word(We don't)", '>>{MysticRay} : Yet she still found a way to handle it sloppier than anyone else. Terrible defense on multiple levels.']]

classify and reply

['>>{ExpFilm_Student} : Assad Shrugs off Trump’s Strike, Uses Just-Hit Airbase to Bomb Rebels', ">>{MFAWG} : Lol, I'm having flashbacks to Reagan launching air strikes against Khadaffi, with similar effects.", '>>{MBAMBA0} : David Simon (of "The Wire" fame) [tweet:](https://twitter.com/AoDespair/status/850316555741212673) >When they spring-cleaned the airbase in prep for a telegraphed, called-it-in-to-ya missile strike, why did those 6 fellas (who got killed) not get the word?', '>>{MBAMBA0} : The win was getting the media to forget all the evidence of Trump/Putin collusion piling up.', '>>{SNIIIFFFF} : And getting some members of congress to praise him as being "presidential". IMHO his strategy worked perfectly--I just hope the media stops jacking off about military action after a few days and realizes how much bullshit this entire thing was.', '>>{yeahscience62} : Well in the Rarest of defenses for President buffoon, if he gave absolutely no warning to the Russians and just bombed the air base then Putin would probably consider it an act of war and start mobilizing his own army', ">>{MBAMBA0} : The media knows exactly what Trump is doing, its just their bosses are telling them to pretend like they don't.", ">>{debrouta} : Thankfully the FBI won't be forgetting about it anytime soon.", '>>{SNIIIFFFF} : Which just infuriates me. No one should fake ignorance about the theatrics of this stunt. Media should keep calling out Trump/Russia and call this like it is.', '>>{dvcat5} : What if trump takes a big negative ratings hit from this, gets cranky and wants to prove he is bring serious with a "shock and awe" type display?', ">>{balmergrl} : You don't have to defend him, it's normal protocol to minimize civilian casualties. We also warn people living in ISIL held territories, which Donald whined about Obama ceaselessly. What's not normal is to orchestrate geopolitical theatrics with Russia as a distraction from other collusions, if that's what indeed happened with so many of Donald's closest associates confabbing with them secretly.", '>>{hederaleaf} : We used to warn civilians living in territories held by ISIL, but there’s some question about whether we still do. [In fact, we may now lie to civilians about this very thing](http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-wp-iraq-comment-4e49c000-163f-11e7-bb16-269934184168-20170331-story.html). >“We followed the instructions of the government, which told us, ‘Stay in your homes and avoid displacement,’” he said. “We heard these instructions on the radio… Also leaflets were dropped by planes. This is why we stayed in our homes.”', ">>{tangibleadhd} : For the establishment neocons, it's their hallelujah moment. I can't wait to see what Pat Buchanan has to say.", ">>{Anal_Gravity} : False, he did warn the Russians. My money is on that they're working with Russia right now.", ">>{the_good_time_mouse} : Hi Putin, this is your warning that I'm going to bomb the airbase like you told me too.", '>>{straydog1980} : They expect one of us at the wreckage brother.', '>>{freakincampers} : This is all, "Wag the Dog".', ">>{Aedeus} : Putin wouldn't mobilize for Turkey shooting down Russian planes, they sure as shit won't mobilize for the U.S. Stop spreading this stupid narrative.", ">>{whatnowdog} : Putin punished Erdogan severely by cutting of trade. Russia is Turkey's biggest trading partner. Now the two are good buddies. Putin is acting like he is mad and has cut off communicating with the US in Syria.", ">>{balmergrl} : Further on in the article it appears the government they are referring to here is Iraq in Mosul, not America. The suspected MO is that they don't want to deal with more refugees. American forces coordinator may be getting sloppier as we are escalating in Mosul but I can't imagine we'd tell civilians to stay put.", '>>{whatnowdog} : There are some in the alt Right that are mad at Trump for the strike.', ">>{Aedeus} : They trade primarily within the EU, Germany is their biggest trade partner to date. Again, russia wouldn't have done shit. They are not the big bad Soviet Union anymore. Why most people are fear mongering about them is beyond me.", '>>{hederaleaf} : It’s a coalition effort; we’d be guilty by association. I’m also hugely skeptical of the idea that we’d be telling civilians to stay put ourselves; but someone who knows when we intend to come in, it seems, is.', '>>{IamConradBlack} : It really was a useless strike, not taking out the runway means the base can keep going, this was a sham show of force. A really expensive dog and pony show.', ">>{whatnowdog} : They are not the SU because of atomic weapons. If it was not for atomic weapons I am guessing the Earth would have started WWIII. The elites don't mind how many soldiers get killed with honor but in the atomic era they also lose everything. Yes we have these small wars using proxy countries but the big countries don't go after each other. Since the SU retracted back to Russia they have been broke. Putin had pulled them a little bit out of the democratic hole and made Russia a bully again. The sanctions on Russia over Ukraine is a good thing because it and the oil price drop caused by Saudi Arabia is slowing Putin's military build."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{ExpFilm_Student} : Assad Shrugs off Trump’s Strike, Uses Just-Hit Airbase to Bomb Rebels', ">>{MFAWG} : Lol, I'm having flashbacks to Reagan launching air strikes against Khadaffi, with similar effects.", '>>{MBAMBA0} : David Simon (of "The Wire" fame) [tweet:](https://twitter.com/AoDespair/status/850316555741212673) >When they spring-cleaned the airbase in prep for a telegraphed, called-it-in-to-ya missile strike, why did those 6 fellas (who got killed) not get the word?', '>>{MBAMBA0} : The win was getting the media to forget all the evidence of Trump/Putin collusion piling up.', '>>{SNIIIFFFF} : And getting some members of congress to praise him as being "presidential". IMHO his strategy worked perfectly--I just hope the media stops jacking off about military action after a few days and realizes how much bullshit this entire thing was.', '>>{yeahscience62} : Well in the Rarest of defenses for President buffoon, if he gave absolutely no warning to the Russians and just bombed the air base then Putin would probably consider it an act of war and start mobilizing his own army', ">>{MBAMBA0} : The media knows exactly what Trump is doing, its just their bosses are telling them to pretend like they don't.", ">>{debrouta} : Thankfully the FBI won't be forgetting about it anytime soon.", '>>{SNIIIFFFF} : Which just infuriates me. No one should fake ignorance about the theatrics of this stunt. Media should keep calling out Trump/Russia and call this like it is.', '>>{dvcat5} : What if trump takes a big negative ratings hit from this, gets cranky and wants to prove he is bring serious with a "shock and awe" type display?', ">>{balmergrl} : You don't have to defend him, it's normal protocol to minimize civilian casualties. We also warn people living in ISIL held territories, which Donald whined about Obama ceaselessly. What's not normal is to orchestrate geopolitical theatrics with Russia as a distraction from other collusions, if that's what indeed happened with so many of Donald's closest associates confabbing with them secretly.", '>>{hederaleaf} : We used to warn civilians living in territories held by ISIL, but there’s some question about whether we still do. [In fact, we may now lie to civilians about this very thing](http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-wp-iraq-comment-4e49c000-163f-11e7-bb16-269934184168-20170331-story.html). >“We followed the instructions of the government, which told us, ‘Stay in your homes and avoid displacement,’” he said. “We heard these instructions on the radio… Also leaflets were dropped by planes. This is why we stayed in our homes.”', ">>{tangibleadhd} : For the establishment neocons, it's their hallelujah moment. I can't wait to see what Pat Buchanan has to say.", ">>{Anal_Gravity} : False, he did warn the Russians. My money is on that they're working with Russia right now.", ">>{the_good_time_mouse} : Hi Putin, this is your warning that I'm going to bomb the airbase like you told me too.", '>>{straydog1980} : They expect one of us at the wreckage brother.', '>>{freakincampers} : This is all, "Wag the Dog".', ">>{Aedeus} : Putin wouldn't mobilize for Turkey shooting down Russian planes, they sure as shit won't mobilize for the U.S. Stop spreading this stupid narrative.", ">>{whatnowdog} : Putin punished Erdogan severely by cutting of trade. Russia is Turkey's biggest trading partner. Now the two are good buddies. Putin is acting like he is mad and has cut off communicating with the US in Syria.", ">>{balmergrl} : Further on in the article it appears the government they are referring to here is Iraq in Mosul, not America. The suspected MO is that they don't want to deal with more refugees. American forces coordinator may be getting sloppier as we are escalating in Mosul but I can't imagine we'd tell civilians to stay put.", '>>{whatnowdog} : There are some in the alt Right that are mad at Trump for the strike.', ">>{Aedeus} : They trade primarily within the EU, Germany is their biggest trade partner to date. Again, russia wouldn't have done shit. They are not the big bad Soviet Union anymore. Why most people are fear mongering about them is beyond me.", '>>{hederaleaf} : It’s a coalition effort; we’d be guilty by association. I’m also hugely skeptical of the idea that we’d be telling civilians to stay put ourselves; but someone who knows when we intend to come in, it seems, is.', '>>{IamConradBlack} : It really was a useless strike, not taking out the runway means the base can keep going, this was a sham show of force. A really expensive dog and pony show.', ">>{whatnowdog} : They are not the SU because of atomic weapons. If it was not for atomic weapons I am guessing the Earth would have started WWIII. The elites don't mind how many soldiers get killed with honor but in the atomic era they also lose everything. Yes we have these small wars using proxy countries but the big countries don't go after each other. Since the SU retracted back to Russia they have been broke. Putin had pulled them a little bit out of the democratic hole and made Russia a bully again. The sanctions on Russia over Ukraine is a good thing because it and the oil price drop caused by Saudi Arabia is slowing Putin's military build."]]

classify and reply

['>>{HDThoreauFTW} : How can we address border issues? Talk to people who live there, not Donald Trump | The Dallas Morning News | "when it comes to border issues, we should listen to the people living there rather than a New Yorker who thinks eating a taco bowl counts as supporting Hispanics"', ">>{Shitposter123456789} : Most Republicans don't think sexual assault would disqualify Trump from the presidency", ">>{throwawatc123} : As long as it's heterosexual and the victim doesn't get an abortion, they're cool with it", '>>{smithcm14} : Stop distracting us from the fact that we are supporting a sexual predator to go into the Oval Office, and get back to the "issues"! Like forcing Mexico to pay for a wall to keep out them deplorables, torturin\' mooslims, and "takin their oil". You know, "issues" facing the American economy!', '>>{mwinks99} : Cant wait till you old fucks die off so the GOP loses its base.', '>>{wytxcook} : > Mr. Trump is correct when he says immigration wouldn’t be at the forefront of this presidential campaign if months ago he hadn’t made some bold and necessary statements. And when the withering media storm ensued he did not back down one iota. That tells you the measure of a man. When the so-called experts said he was too brash and outspoken, and that he would fade away, they were proven wrong. We are confident they will be proven wrong again in November when he becomes President of the United States. [National Border Patrol Council Endorses Donald Trump for President](http://www.bpunion.org/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/1824-national-border-patrol-council-endorses-donald-trump-for-president)', ">>{Shiftz} : I think you can also be sad at the point that 53% of I's also don't think he should be disqualified for it.", '>>{the_glutton} : A border patrol union that would benefit heavily from the wall being build endorsing a candidate that supports a massive expansion of union members? Color me shocked. This is the equivalent of saying Planned Parenthood endorses Hillary Clinton.', '>>{SlicedDicedBeef} : > ...than a New Yorker who thinks eating a taco bowl counts as supporting Hispanics Damn near as funny as a woman born in Illinois who thinks carrying hot sauce in her purse counts as supporting blacks.', '>>{black_flag_4ever} : I live near the border, Obama has never visited my area. He has not seen what his policies have done.', '>>{letdogsvote} : But [Trump loves Hispanics!](http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/10E96/production/_89607296_cincodemayo.jpg)', ">>{gamechanger55} : Cool. Coming from someone who actually believes trump did assault women. If anything media says about trump is true it's definitely that he's a misogynist. But let me get this straight. Trump is never convicted of Sexual assault in court but we're supposed to take it as he's guilty. However, when it comes to clinton, mountains of evidence doesn't convict her of corruption.", '>>{arod1978} : Who benefits from open borders? Cartels and liberals that need third world uneducated unskilled voters to vote for them.', '>>{DavesJuicyDouble} : Citizens who live near the border fully support the wall', '>>{HDThoreauFTW} : yes that exact tweet was included in the article.', ">>{evil420pimp} : Think Arizona tried this, pretty sure it didn't go well...", ">>{Haroldluster3} : Yeah, northern liberals don't like when southwesterners tell them the truth about immigration policy. You can criticize trumps ideas, but my liberal friend from upstate NY thought I was being racist when I said the southwest needed better border security. I told her my mom is Mexican, and this rich white girl totally blew me off like I was crazy. That kind of snotty attitude is prevalent amongst liberals and it's not going to win them any votes this election.", ">>{IAMAconcernedparent} : No, it's about consent. If a politician has a consensual extramarital affair with an intern, then he deserves to be impeached. But if he forcibly assaults like 10 women without consent, then it's no big deal. It all makes sense if you think about it.", ">>{reluctant_qualifier} : > Women (46%) are only slightly more likely than men (43%) to say that sexual assault would disqualify Trump from the presidency. That's... kind of depressing.", ">>{Kanzisbuddy} : But I bet they won't bring their daughters to the White House...", '>>{mindlessrabble} : Yet it is a felony that would prevent someone from voting in many, many states.', '>>{Shitposter123456789} : The poll explicitly prefaced the question with ["if the allegations that Donald Trump sexually assaulted women are true"](https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/inlineimage/2016-10-17/assault3.png). Essentially the respondents were saying that even if it was true, they don\'t care.', '>>{ssldvr} : Give me a break. She was investigated multiple times for partisan led scandals and cleared every time. Facts > feels.', ">>{gamechanger55} : >She was investigated multiple times for partisan led scandals Cool lets investigate how her campaign coordinated with super pacs even though it's illegal. Facts>feels", '>>{ssldvr} : Yeah, you need actual evidence for that. Not Reddit comments on exaggerated claims.', ">>{shoe788} : Uhh Trump's campaign manager is literally the ceo of a company that coordinates with PACs...", ">>{Conman_Drumpf} : Also as long as the person being accused isn't Bill Clinton, they're cool with it.", ">>{Jaxticko} : :( That just shows the level of internalized sexism. Women not actively recognizing harassment is not okay? Ugh. I'm gonna go eat emotionally now.", '>>{Justmadethisaccunt} : I believe the article is bullshit first of all. I am an independent and I will not put in type what I hope will happen to Trump. I hate Trump bit you can not state most republicans are okay with sexual assault. What a piece of shit news source, knowingly throwing gas on the fire.', ">>{rtb8} : It's sort of the same internalized sexism that the right like to say exists among muslim women. Not saying both cases aren't issues in modern societies. Just pointing out the complete lack of self awareness.", '>>{Shitposter123456789} : It is not an opinion piece; it is a poll in which respondents were asked if the allegations were true, would that disqualify Trump. "Only 19% of Republicans say that sexual assault would disqualify him, while 35% say that it is relevant but not disqualifying and 39% say that it is simply not relevant to the election."', ">>{ImNotJesus} : To be fair, wasn't he technically impeached for perjury and not the affair?", ">>{-Mountain-King-} : I'd love to ask these people what, if anything, would disqualify him in their eyes.", ">>{ImNotJesus} : If you've ever laughed at the term rape culture, I really hope you now see it.", '>>{ImNotJesus} : This is what people mean when they talk about rape culture.', '>>{throwawatc123} : Being black or female, but most of all, being a Democrat', ">>{ImNotJesus} : I didn't read this thing that I'm commenting on but I'm really sure that I'm right. Mostly importantly I'm **really** angry about it.", ">>{tsuuga} : >RUSH LIMBAUGH: But if the left ever senses and smells that there's no consent in part of the equation then here come the rape police.", '>>{Trumpbart} : I bet most Republicans also think Hillary is disqualified for sticking with Bill and being mean to those accusers.', '>>{Shitposter123456789} : [Jimmy Kimmel did something along those lines back in June.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-PHPMPXnQA)', '>>{teapot112} : Donald Trump phenomenon in GOP simply proves one thing: That their so called "conservative values" are all just a sham.', ">>{Justmadethisaccunt} : I was not responding to the poll stats. Republicans aren't all the way dumb. Granted we see a lot of idiots on tv declaring undying love for the starfish mouth piece. But I know there a lot of regular people out there that have been a republican all their life find it hard to just give up their party. I do to,, but this is not a normal election.", ">>{teapot112} : Yougov is a B rated pollster. That rating is more credible than the Rasmussen pollster. Also, for comparison, yougov is also more credible than gallup pollster too. Also, this isn't just an article. It has actual data to back its claims if you look at the bottom of the page.", '>>{Shitposter123456789} : I still don\'t understand why you were angry about the article though. The article says nothing like Republicans are "all the way dumb", it is merely citing poll numbers. I don\'t think this poll makes Republicans look dumb; it makes them look hypocritical.', '>>{HamChad} : But... what exactly are you responding too? Because a poll was posted. Are yous saying you disagree with it?', '>>{Justmadethisaccunt} : Yes. I disagree that most republicans think sexual assault is ok for a presidential nominee. Do you disagree?', '>>{bauboish} : But Bill Clinton getting a blowjob from an intern is grounds for impeachment.', ">>{100percentpureOJ} : >The latest research from YouGov/Huffington Post shows that, **even if the allegations of sexual assault were true, this would not disqualify him from the presidency in the eyes of most Americans.** 44% say that he would be disqualified from the presidency if he had sexually assaulted women, while 49% say that it is either relevant but not disqualifying (27%) or that it is not even relevant (22%). OK, so **most Americans don't think sexual assault would disqualify Trump from the presidency**. I wonder if people think the charges against him are credible. Oh wait. >Just under half of the country (43%) believe that the allegations against Trump are credible. So **most Americans don't even believe the allegations**, and if they were true they wouldn't care anyway.", '>>{gnomesaynn} : But what if a homosexual dude gets pregnit? Then /r/the_donald will h8 them even more. There haight nose know bowns. Gud thing wear hear to curreck the wreckurd. They r full of h8. CNN told me there biggits.', ">>{bauboish} : This election really is a moment for some self reflection. Before we criticize Muslim nations for promoting females as 2nd class citizens, maybe we should see the accepted gender discrimination that exist here. We may not be blatant about it, but it's there and it's sizable. After all, if Clinton was a man would anyone care whether she's too aggressive or something on the debate stage and may come off bitchy?", ">>{rtb8} : You are missing the point. The women of either society are willingly submitting to the other gender making themselves unequal. To what degree is besides the point. It's only the liberals that are close to egalitarianism. Besides, genital mutilation is mostly an African tradition.", ">>{gotsafe} : Yup. Before the election, I bought into the pay gap just being a factor of women holding jobs that pay less. When Bernie spoke about it, I did my research and came to two realizations: 1. Something is still messed up if the job reason is the reason to the pay gap. In terms of equality, there's no reason there should be more men in certain fields and more women in other. That's a very broad stroke and it oversimplifies (doesn't account for women who leave the workforce to raise children, or that women as a whole might have skewed job preferences compared to men), but it's generally true. 1. Frequently, women do get paid less for the exact same job. Native me thought that wasn't the case because, from my limited experience as a manager at a single company, that *wasn't* the case. There are numerous studies that show a pay gap, even when normalized based on job roles..", '>>{enry_straker} : but a blowjob certainly disqualified Bill Clinton from the presidency.', ">>{sunbearimon} : I'm not trying to criticise you, but why did it take a man speaking about it before you took the pay gap seriously?", ">>{gotsafe} : Just wasn't something I thought about really - I didn't encounter it at work. My female reports were making more than my male reports, some for the same role. One of them was making 20% more than me despite the fact that I was her manager. She wasn't an all star performer either. Very good, but not one of those rare special talents that you dump money on in hopes that they stay. Then, I was particularly interested in this election, Bernie was the candidate I supported and was the first one I heard bring it up, I thought I heard somewhere that it wasn't really an issue, but I followed that up with research so I could educate myself.", ">>{bauboish} : Not to speak for gotsafe, but I think a lot of younger people who got interested in politics this election probably haven't really bothered to really think about these things before. I don't think it's a matter of a man saying it with Bernie supporters. But it is probably telling that when Hilary Clinton rolled out her universal health care 20 years ago, she was considered a pariah both in Washington and around the country. And now, with Bernie saying essentially the same thing, people are lauding him as a revolutionary. Not saying that today Hilary is still the same person she was in her younger days (I personally think she's more politician and less activist today), but it does goes to show how people can respond to the same words differently.", '>>{fco83} : The kind of woman who still considers herself a republican at this point, is not representative of the vast majority of women.', ">>{fco83} : Just using this as a reference https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_sexual_misconduct_allegations He had no sexual assaults proven against him. I believe the only one that was alleged before the reelection even was Paula Jones, and even she was shown to have made false statements, and her case was dismissed without merit, before it was settled after she appealed when he lied about monica. Juanita Broderrick made her allegations in 99, but she said under oath nothing happened. Ken Starr, no friend of Bill, determined Kathleen Willey lied numerous times Bill slept around, which is certainly nothing to celebrate, but there's a big difference between that and sexual assault.", ">>{fco83} : 23% are unsure\\think they havent heard enough to say. 26%, AKA trump's blind supporters, believe they are not credible.", ">>{silversurfer666} : > In terms of equality, there's no reason there should be more men in certain fields and more women in other. Really? There's no reason why there are more men who are coal miners, waste disposal workers, oil rig workers etc.? > women do get paid less for the exact same job Isn't that illegal though? Like if a company sets up a wanted ad for a computer programmer and it says $2000/month, but when a woman applies they reduce it to $1800/month for no reason other than it's a woman. Seems unlikely.", ">>{Figaro2020} : But... It's a poll, it's questions and answers. You can't disagree with a representation of what people are saying. The fact that you don't know anyone saying that does not mean a majority doesn't say it. You know some people, not all people", '>>{Valarauth} : Maybe someone should do a poll so that we could have some actual numbers instead of speculating about it.', '>>{akeetlebeetle4664} : I think Ann Coulter said it best. The only thing that could turn her against him was if he changed his stance on Illegal Immigrants. Which he did right before her book came out.', ">>{ziplex} : Is it really surprising from a party that's main principals are 'give the rich and powerful whatever they want, fuck the little guy' ?", ">>{OnthefarWind} : Trust me, I've been well in the know for two years now (I work in a Justice field) but this still surprised me and makes me call back to my high school days when I thought it was all a joke.", ">>{masklinn} : Why? Starr's investigations against Bill ended up going with a consensual extramarital affair and found nothing worth using to the assault accusations. And it's not like Starr was trying to pull punches, they started from Whitewater, looked at the travel office firings, FBI misuse and sexual harassment allegations. Yet the only thing they kept at the end was the affair (and barely even that, rather catching Bill Clinton lying about it). All sexual harassment or assault cases were dismissed without merit or found to be outright lies.", '>>{Ordmantel69} : i personally find it hilarious some of the biggest talking points in regards to the alt rights fear of muslims/immigrants is their "roving rape squads" in migrant camps or their "barbaric" treatment of women stemming from their religion. Seems like they have more in common with sharia law than they even know, hell even trump when he found out how easy it is to get a divorce in saudi arabia started praising them.', ">>{Amaleplatypus} : I don't think it would disqualify him either. Not saying I don't think it should, just that I don't think it will. I feel the same way about Clinton's email scandal.", '>>{S-O-What} : If they post an ad for a computer programmer, there is no law prohibiting the employee from asking for more than that.', ">>{Komandirskie} : How is America a rape culture? Anyone accused of rape is lynched by the media. True or not a mere rape accusation can ruin someone. If the rape culture was real then rape accusations wouldn't be taken seriously. A real rape culture is the Middle East. Rape of children is of no consequence to the Afghans. Women getting stoned for adultery after they were raped. That's a real rape culture.", ">>{Fruhmann} : sexual assault. treason. lying. Clinton could eat a child during the debate tonight while Trump deflowered a virgin and both sides would justify the act and excuse while it's not a disqualifying offense for their candidate.", '>>{mommy2libras} : Lol. I\'m sure you\'ll hear how Starr just "let the Clintons get away with it" but I remember all of that happening. He\'d have busted them for *anything* if he could have, even overdue library books.', '>>{mommy2libras} : Broaddrick also told Starr during the course of the investigation (after she\'d made the rape accusation) that neither Bill nor Hillary had threatened her or in any way forced her to keep it quiet. It wasn\'t until quite a bit later that she came out with the "Hillary grabbed my arm at a party and thanked me for working on Bill\'s campaign and I took it as a threat" story.', ">>{mommy2libras} : He wasn't even impeached for the affair, just lying about it.", '>>{WittensDog16} : I grew up in a reasonably wealthy and educated suburb of Massachusetts, right down the road from a University, so perhaps the "America" I grew up in was a bit different from America as a whole, but either way, my primary takeaway from this election is that there are ugly things about my country which I never really appreciated or knew about in any way. Before this election cycle, if someone said to me "the US has a rape culture where rape is accepted as OK," I would have laughed in their face for saying something so ridiculous. But now we have polls where a sizeable fraction of the populace is more or less saying exactly that (at least in this particular case). And I feel like I\'m just left sitting here in a state of shock. I just feel like I must be in some kind of a bizarre dream to have made it to age 29 and somehow never have been aware of these sorts of things.', ">>{Thanmandrathor} : >Isn't that illegal though? Like if a company sets up a wanted ad for a computer programmer and it says $2000/month, but when a woman applies they reduce it to $1800/month for no reason other than it's a woman. Seems unlikely. Women tend not to negotiate as often/as aggressively for pay raises and promotions and such. Which is where some of that discrepancy may end up coming from. Even if they start at the same level, I'd say the odds are that the man would end up being paid more in the long run and being promoted faster.", ">>{mommy2libras} : I'm sure some don't think it's ok. In fact, I know for a fact that there are many who don't. However, this polled actual Republicans and found these numbers based on their responses. Also, look at the *statements*. Some don't think it's even relevant (and that is messed up) but the question wasn't *should* it be disqualifying but if they think it *would be disqualifying in the eyes of most Americans*. I'm sure that many answered based on their own opinion of whether it *should* be or not but some likely answered it based on what was actually asked, which requires them to answer based not only on their own opinions but to also consider the opinions of those around them.", ">>{mommy2libras} : Um, no? Nowhere did the poll assume there was truth to the claims. It actually specifically asked IF it were true do they think it would be disqualifying. It's called a hypothetical question and is created to get the opinions of whoever is being polled.", '>>{felesroo} : No one should be disqualified from running for office for reasons outside of Constitutional qualification (age, citizenship). I don\'t think it should be up to arbitrary law to say someone can\'t run. That would open up all sorts of abuses. Voters have to have a modicum of morality. Why in the fuck would someone vote for a grab-ass scumbag who\'s getting all froggy on the US? Seriously? Don\'t people have any self- or social respect anymore? Are they willing to support any sleazebag with the right party behind him? And this is also on political parties. THEY can disqualify someone for running under their banner. The party can say, "Er, no" and keep people like Trump out. The fact that they didn\'t is quite telling.', ">>{forgeofgod} : It's depressing, but you need to ask Republicans the question in a way they would understand. Would you think Donald Trump is disqualified for the presidency if he assaulted you or your wife or your daughter... etc. I bet you that number changes drastically.", ">>{liberationation} : The problem is how people talk about rape. When folks pull out that false and misleading 1/5 statistic, then yall look like liars. If someone talks about it in the context of looking at % acceptance of harassment or assault of a person they support, then it's much more real.", ">>{atomic0range} : Rape culture is a tendency for rape to be minimized, laughed about, ignored, or dismissed culturally. Its the kind of stuff that leads people to think getting their dates drunk and taking advantage of them is normal and ok. Or the idea that you can't rape someone you're married to. Yes, obviously the middle east has a much bigger problem with rape culture... that doesn't change that we have some of it too and should be working to stamp it out.", '>>{WaldoWoo} : In other news, most republicans have thrown the baby out with the bath water.', '>>{Komandirskie} : No one is marginalizing rape though. I mean people will start to if more people equate regretting sex with rape. Rape culture in America is a myth.', ">>{kanst} : I grew up in a wealthy suburb in NY and moved to Boston for school. I had the exact same experience. Originally I gave little weight to the claims because it completely didn't mesh with my experience. No one I knew had any problems with gay people, no one had issues with black people (to be fair there basically weren't any where I grew up) and no one apologized for sexual assault. Now I am realizing I just missed it growing up in my little wealthy liberal bubble.", '>>{dguy101} : Gotta love the party of high family values and bible humping...', '>>{do_itt} : But alleged sexual assault against the candidates husband does?', '>>{theblackfool} : Except people are marginalizing rape. How is that not obvious to you when almost half the country thinks that a person who sexually assaults people should be president?', ">>{Komandirskie} : Because they don't equate the presidency to moral leadership.", ">>{51Bootwearer} : I think the entire things stupid. It's pretty impossible to be 'disqualified' in a democracy, and that so many Americans think this should be a case for that is just depressing. I'm glad many are smart enough to not think that.", ">>{TonySoprano420} : I think he was disqualified long before we found out about his sexual assault, so I don't think it's disqualifying either.", ">>{TonySoprano420} : So why haven't I been fired and replaced with a cheaper female employee?", ">>{gotsafe} : Like I said, personal anecdotes aren't enough. Women got paid more for the same roles in my last company, perhaps out of chance. But, there are studies that look at this problem in aggregate and show that there truly is a problem.", ">>{Justmadethisaccunt} : This election is so fucking hard to comprehend. Acquaintances, family,friends have shown their true self,and it is heartbreaking. I am not being dramatic at all, it is a slap of reality to see where their mind is at. >Yes. I disagree that most republicans think sexual assault is ok for a presidential nominee. I take it back, you are right and I didn't want to acknowledge it. I reread everything and I am beyond sad right now. The hate and ignorance my children (who are mixed) will have to deal with, make me want to cry or fight somebody. After 8 years of a black president, not saying he was perfect but for black children, it was an amazing hurdle.", '>>{PeacefullyFighting} : What are the democrats saying now that there are witnesses speaking out about bill groping and rubbing his dick on that poor ladies neck!']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{Shitposter123456789} : Most Republicans don't think sexual assault would disqualify Trump from the presidency", ">>{throwawatc123} : As long as it's heterosexual and the victim doesn't get an abortion, they're cool with it", '>>{smithcm14} : Stop distracting us from the fact that we are supporting a sexual predator to go into the Oval Office, and get back to the "issues"! Like forcing Mexico to pay for a wall to keep out them deplorables, torturin\' mooslims, and "takin their oil". You know, "issues" facing the American economy!', '>>{mwinks99} : Cant wait till you old fucks die off so the GOP loses its base.', ">>{Shiftz} : I think you can also be sad at the point that 53% of I's also don't think he should be disqualified for it.", ">>{gamechanger55} : Cool. Coming from someone who actually believes trump did assault women. If anything media says about trump is true it's definitely that he's a misogynist. But let me get this straight. Trump is never convicted of Sexual assault in court but we're supposed to take it as he's guilty. However, when it comes to clinton, mountains of evidence doesn't convict her of corruption.", ">>{IAMAconcernedparent} : No, it's about consent. If a politician has a consensual extramarital affair with an intern, then he deserves to be impeached. But if he forcibly assaults like 10 women without consent, then it's no big deal. It all makes sense if you think about it.", ">>{reluctant_qualifier} : > Women (46%) are only slightly more likely than men (43%) to say that sexual assault would disqualify Trump from the presidency. That's... kind of depressing.", ">>{Kanzisbuddy} : But I bet they won't bring their daughters to the White House...", '>>{mindlessrabble} : Yet it is a felony that would prevent someone from voting in many, many states.', '>>{Shitposter123456789} : The poll explicitly prefaced the question with ["if the allegations that Donald Trump sexually assaulted women are true"](https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/inlineimage/2016-10-17/assault3.png). Essentially the respondents were saying that even if it was true, they don\'t care.', '>>{ssldvr} : Give me a break. She was investigated multiple times for partisan led scandals and cleared every time. Facts > feels.', ">>{gamechanger55} : >She was investigated multiple times for partisan led scandals Cool lets investigate how her campaign coordinated with super pacs even though it's illegal. Facts>feels", '>>{ssldvr} : Yeah, you need actual evidence for that. Not Reddit comments on exaggerated claims.', ">>{shoe788} : Uhh Trump's campaign manager is literally the ceo of a company that coordinates with PACs...", ">>{Conman_Drumpf} : Also as long as the person being accused isn't Bill Clinton, they're cool with it.", ">>{Jaxticko} : :( That just shows the level of internalized sexism. Women not actively recognizing harassment is not okay? Ugh. I'm gonna go eat emotionally now.", '>>{Justmadethisaccunt} : I believe the article is bullshit first of all. I am an independent and I will not put in type what I hope will happen to Trump. I hate Trump bit you can not state most republicans are okay with sexual assault. What a piece of shit news source, knowingly throwing gas on the fire.', ">>{rtb8} : It's sort of the same internalized sexism that the right like to say exists among muslim women. Not saying both cases aren't issues in modern societies. Just pointing out the complete lack of self awareness.", '>>{Shitposter123456789} : It is not an opinion piece; it is a poll in which respondents were asked if the allegations were true, would that disqualify Trump. "Only 19% of Republicans say that sexual assault would disqualify him, while 35% say that it is relevant but not disqualifying and 39% say that it is simply not relevant to the election."', ">>{ImNotJesus} : To be fair, wasn't he technically impeached for perjury and not the affair?", ">>{-Mountain-King-} : I'd love to ask these people what, if anything, would disqualify him in their eyes.", ">>{ImNotJesus} : If you've ever laughed at the term rape culture, I really hope you now see it.", '>>{ImNotJesus} : This is what people mean when they talk about rape culture.', '>>{throwawatc123} : Being black or female, but most of all, being a Democrat', ">>{ImNotJesus} : I didn't read this thing that I'm commenting on but I'm really sure that I'm right. Mostly importantly I'm **really** angry about it.", ">>{tsuuga} : >RUSH LIMBAUGH: But if the left ever senses and smells that there's no consent in part of the equation then here come the rape police.", '>>{Trumpbart} : I bet most Republicans also think Hillary is disqualified for sticking with Bill and being mean to those accusers.', '>>{Shitposter123456789} : [Jimmy Kimmel did something along those lines back in June.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-PHPMPXnQA)', '>>{teapot112} : Donald Trump phenomenon in GOP simply proves one thing: That their so called "conservative values" are all just a sham.', ">>{Justmadethisaccunt} : I was not responding to the poll stats. Republicans aren't all the way dumb. Granted we see a lot of idiots on tv declaring undying love for the starfish mouth piece. But I know there a lot of regular people out there that have been a republican all their life find it hard to just give up their party. I do to,, but this is not a normal election.", ">>{teapot112} : Yougov is a B rated pollster. That rating is more credible than the Rasmussen pollster. Also, for comparison, yougov is also more credible than gallup pollster too. Also, this isn't just an article. It has actual data to back its claims if you look at the bottom of the page.", '>>{Shitposter123456789} : I still don\'t understand why you were angry about the article though. The article says nothing like Republicans are "all the way dumb", it is merely citing poll numbers. I don\'t think this poll makes Republicans look dumb; it makes them look hypocritical.', '>>{HamChad} : But... what exactly are you responding too? Because a poll was posted. Are yous saying you disagree with it?', '>>{Justmadethisaccunt} : Yes. I disagree that most republicans think sexual assault is ok for a presidential nominee. Do you disagree?', '>>{bauboish} : But Bill Clinton getting a blowjob from an intern is grounds for impeachment.', ">>{100percentpureOJ} : >The latest research from YouGov/Huffington Post shows that, **even if the allegations of sexual assault were true, this would not disqualify him from the presidency in the eyes of most Americans.** 44% say that he would be disqualified from the presidency if he had sexually assaulted women, while 49% say that it is either relevant but not disqualifying (27%) or that it is not even relevant (22%). OK, so **most Americans don't think sexual assault would disqualify Trump from the presidency**. I wonder if people think the charges against him are credible. Oh wait. >Just under half of the country (43%) believe that the allegations against Trump are credible. So **most Americans don't even believe the allegations**, and if they were true they wouldn't care anyway.", '>>{gnomesaynn} : But what if a homosexual dude gets pregnit? Then /r/the_donald will h8 them even more. There haight nose know bowns. Gud thing wear hear to curreck the wreckurd. They r full of h8. CNN told me there biggits.', ">>{bauboish} : This election really is a moment for some self reflection. Before we criticize Muslim nations for promoting females as 2nd class citizens, maybe we should see the accepted gender discrimination that exist here. We may not be blatant about it, but it's there and it's sizable. After all, if Clinton was a man would anyone care whether she's too aggressive or something on the debate stage and may come off bitchy?", ">>{rtb8} : You are missing the point. The women of either society are willingly submitting to the other gender making themselves unequal. To what degree is besides the point. It's only the liberals that are close to egalitarianism. Besides, genital mutilation is mostly an African tradition.", ">>{gotsafe} : Yup. Before the election, I bought into the pay gap just being a factor of women holding jobs that pay less. When Bernie spoke about it, I did my research and came to two realizations: 1. Something is still messed up if the job reason is the reason to the pay gap. In terms of equality, there's no reason there should be more men in certain fields and more women in other. That's a very broad stroke and it oversimplifies (doesn't account for women who leave the workforce to raise children, or that women as a whole might have skewed job preferences compared to men), but it's generally true. 1. Frequently, women do get paid less for the exact same job. Native me thought that wasn't the case because, from my limited experience as a manager at a single company, that *wasn't* the case. There are numerous studies that show a pay gap, even when normalized based on job roles..", '>>{enry_straker} : but a blowjob certainly disqualified Bill Clinton from the presidency.', ">>{sunbearimon} : I'm not trying to criticise you, but why did it take a man speaking about it before you took the pay gap seriously?", ">>{gotsafe} : Just wasn't something I thought about really - I didn't encounter it at work. My female reports were making more than my male reports, some for the same role. One of them was making 20% more than me despite the fact that I was her manager. She wasn't an all star performer either. Very good, but not one of those rare special talents that you dump money on in hopes that they stay. Then, I was particularly interested in this election, Bernie was the candidate I supported and was the first one I heard bring it up, I thought I heard somewhere that it wasn't really an issue, but I followed that up with research so I could educate myself.", ">>{bauboish} : Not to speak for gotsafe, but I think a lot of younger people who got interested in politics this election probably haven't really bothered to really think about these things before. I don't think it's a matter of a man saying it with Bernie supporters. But it is probably telling that when Hilary Clinton rolled out her universal health care 20 years ago, she was considered a pariah both in Washington and around the country. And now, with Bernie saying essentially the same thing, people are lauding him as a revolutionary. Not saying that today Hilary is still the same person she was in her younger days (I personally think she's more politician and less activist today), but it does goes to show how people can respond to the same words differently.", '>>{fco83} : The kind of woman who still considers herself a republican at this point, is not representative of the vast majority of women.', ">>{fco83} : Just using this as a reference https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_sexual_misconduct_allegations He had no sexual assaults proven against him. I believe the only one that was alleged before the reelection even was Paula Jones, and even she was shown to have made false statements, and her case was dismissed without merit, before it was settled after she appealed when he lied about monica. Juanita Broderrick made her allegations in 99, but she said under oath nothing happened. Ken Starr, no friend of Bill, determined Kathleen Willey lied numerous times Bill slept around, which is certainly nothing to celebrate, but there's a big difference between that and sexual assault.", ">>{fco83} : 23% are unsure\\think they havent heard enough to say. 26%, AKA trump's blind supporters, believe they are not credible.", ">>{silversurfer666} : > In terms of equality, there's no reason there should be more men in certain fields and more women in other. Really? There's no reason why there are more men who are coal miners, waste disposal workers, oil rig workers etc.? > women do get paid less for the exact same job Isn't that illegal though? Like if a company sets up a wanted ad for a computer programmer and it says $2000/month, but when a woman applies they reduce it to $1800/month for no reason other than it's a woman. Seems unlikely.", ">>{Figaro2020} : But... It's a poll, it's questions and answers. You can't disagree with a representation of what people are saying. The fact that you don't know anyone saying that does not mean a majority doesn't say it. You know some people, not all people", '>>{Valarauth} : Maybe someone should do a poll so that we could have some actual numbers instead of speculating about it.', '>>{akeetlebeetle4664} : I think Ann Coulter said it best. The only thing that could turn her against him was if he changed his stance on Illegal Immigrants. Which he did right before her book came out.', ">>{ziplex} : Is it really surprising from a party that's main principals are 'give the rich and powerful whatever they want, fuck the little guy' ?", ">>{OnthefarWind} : Trust me, I've been well in the know for two years now (I work in a Justice field) but this still surprised me and makes me call back to my high school days when I thought it was all a joke.", ">>{masklinn} : Why? Starr's investigations against Bill ended up going with a consensual extramarital affair and found nothing worth using to the assault accusations. And it's not like Starr was trying to pull punches, they started from Whitewater, looked at the travel office firings, FBI misuse and sexual harassment allegations. Yet the only thing they kept at the end was the affair (and barely even that, rather catching Bill Clinton lying about it). All sexual harassment or assault cases were dismissed without merit or found to be outright lies.", '>>{Ordmantel69} : i personally find it hilarious some of the biggest talking points in regards to the alt rights fear of muslims/immigrants is their "roving rape squads" in migrant camps or their "barbaric" treatment of women stemming from their religion. Seems like they have more in common with sharia law than they even know, hell even trump when he found out how easy it is to get a divorce in saudi arabia started praising them.', ">>{Amaleplatypus} : I don't think it would disqualify him either. Not saying I don't think it should, just that I don't think it will. I feel the same way about Clinton's email scandal.", '>>{S-O-What} : If they post an ad for a computer programmer, there is no law prohibiting the employee from asking for more than that.', ">>{Komandirskie} : How is America a rape culture? Anyone accused of rape is lynched by the media. True or not a mere rape accusation can ruin someone. If the rape culture was real then rape accusations wouldn't be taken seriously. A real rape culture is the Middle East. Rape of children is of no consequence to the Afghans. Women getting stoned for adultery after they were raped. That's a real rape culture.", ">>{Fruhmann} : sexual assault. treason. lying. Clinton could eat a child during the debate tonight while Trump deflowered a virgin and both sides would justify the act and excuse while it's not a disqualifying offense for their candidate.", '>>{mommy2libras} : Lol. I\'m sure you\'ll hear how Starr just "let the Clintons get away with it" but I remember all of that happening. He\'d have busted them for *anything* if he could have, even overdue library books.', '>>{mommy2libras} : Broaddrick also told Starr during the course of the investigation (after she\'d made the rape accusation) that neither Bill nor Hillary had threatened her or in any way forced her to keep it quiet. It wasn\'t until quite a bit later that she came out with the "Hillary grabbed my arm at a party and thanked me for working on Bill\'s campaign and I took it as a threat" story.', ">>{mommy2libras} : He wasn't even impeached for the affair, just lying about it.", '>>{WittensDog16} : I grew up in a reasonably wealthy and educated suburb of Massachusetts, right down the road from a University, so perhaps the "America" I grew up in was a bit different from America as a whole, but either way, my primary takeaway from this election is that there are ugly things about my country which I never really appreciated or knew about in any way. Before this election cycle, if someone said to me "the US has a rape culture where rape is accepted as OK," I would have laughed in their face for saying something so ridiculous. But now we have polls where a sizeable fraction of the populace is more or less saying exactly that (at least in this particular case). And I feel like I\'m just left sitting here in a state of shock. I just feel like I must be in some kind of a bizarre dream to have made it to age 29 and somehow never have been aware of these sorts of things.', ">>{Thanmandrathor} : >Isn't that illegal though? Like if a company sets up a wanted ad for a computer programmer and it says $2000/month, but when a woman applies they reduce it to $1800/month for no reason other than it's a woman. Seems unlikely. Women tend not to negotiate as often/as aggressively for pay raises and promotions and such. Which is where some of that discrepancy may end up coming from. Even if they start at the same level, I'd say the odds are that the man would end up being paid more in the long run and being promoted faster.", ">>{mommy2libras} : I'm sure some don't think it's ok. In fact, I know for a fact that there are many who don't. However, this polled actual Republicans and found these numbers based on their responses. Also, look at the *statements*. Some don't think it's even relevant (and that is messed up) but the question wasn't *should* it be disqualifying but if they think it *would be disqualifying in the eyes of most Americans*. I'm sure that many answered based on their own opinion of whether it *should* be or not but some likely answered it based on what was actually asked, which requires them to answer based not only on their own opinions but to also consider the opinions of those around them.", ">>{mommy2libras} : Um, no? Nowhere did the poll assume there was truth to the claims. It actually specifically asked IF it were true do they think it would be disqualifying. It's called a hypothetical question and is created to get the opinions of whoever is being polled.", '>>{felesroo} : No one should be disqualified from running for office for reasons outside of Constitutional qualification (age, citizenship). I don\'t think it should be up to arbitrary law to say someone can\'t run. That would open up all sorts of abuses. Voters have to have a modicum of morality. Why in the fuck would someone vote for a grab-ass scumbag who\'s getting all froggy on the US? Seriously? Don\'t people have any self- or social respect anymore? Are they willing to support any sleazebag with the right party behind him? And this is also on political parties. THEY can disqualify someone for running under their banner. The party can say, "Er, no" and keep people like Trump out. The fact that they didn\'t is quite telling.', ">>{forgeofgod} : It's depressing, but you need to ask Republicans the question in a way they would understand. Would you think Donald Trump is disqualified for the presidency if he assaulted you or your wife or your daughter... etc. I bet you that number changes drastically.", ">>{liberationation} : The problem is how people talk about rape. When folks pull out that false and misleading 1/5 statistic, then yall look like liars. If someone talks about it in the context of looking at % acceptance of harassment or assault of a person they support, then it's much more real.", ">>{atomic0range} : Rape culture is a tendency for rape to be minimized, laughed about, ignored, or dismissed culturally. Its the kind of stuff that leads people to think getting their dates drunk and taking advantage of them is normal and ok. Or the idea that you can't rape someone you're married to. Yes, obviously the middle east has a much bigger problem with rape culture... that doesn't change that we have some of it too and should be working to stamp it out.", '>>{WaldoWoo} : In other news, most republicans have thrown the baby out with the bath water.', '>>{Komandirskie} : No one is marginalizing rape though. I mean people will start to if more people equate regretting sex with rape. Rape culture in America is a myth.', ">>{kanst} : I grew up in a wealthy suburb in NY and moved to Boston for school. I had the exact same experience. Originally I gave little weight to the claims because it completely didn't mesh with my experience. No one I knew had any problems with gay people, no one had issues with black people (to be fair there basically weren't any where I grew up) and no one apologized for sexual assault. Now I am realizing I just missed it growing up in my little wealthy liberal bubble.", '>>{dguy101} : Gotta love the party of high family values and bible humping...', '>>{do_itt} : But alleged sexual assault against the candidates husband does?', '>>{theblackfool} : Except people are marginalizing rape. How is that not obvious to you when almost half the country thinks that a person who sexually assaults people should be president?', ">>{Komandirskie} : Because they don't equate the presidency to moral leadership.", ">>{51Bootwearer} : I think the entire things stupid. It's pretty impossible to be 'disqualified' in a democracy, and that so many Americans think this should be a case for that is just depressing. I'm glad many are smart enough to not think that.", ">>{TonySoprano420} : I think he was disqualified long before we found out about his sexual assault, so I don't think it's disqualifying either.", ">>{TonySoprano420} : So why haven't I been fired and replaced with a cheaper female employee?", ">>{gotsafe} : Like I said, personal anecdotes aren't enough. Women got paid more for the same roles in my last company, perhaps out of chance. But, there are studies that look at this problem in aggregate and show that there truly is a problem.", ">>{Justmadethisaccunt} : This election is so fucking hard to comprehend. Acquaintances, family,friends have shown their true self,and it is heartbreaking. I am not being dramatic at all, it is a slap of reality to see where their mind is at. >Yes. I disagree that most republicans think sexual assault is ok for a presidential nominee. I take it back, you are right and I didn't want to acknowledge it. I reread everything and I am beyond sad right now. The hate and ignorance my children (who are mixed) will have to deal with, make me want to cry or fight somebody. After 8 years of a black president, not saying he was perfect but for black children, it was an amazing hurdle.", '>>{PeacefullyFighting} : What are the democrats saying now that there are witnesses speaking out about bill groping and rubbing his dick on that poor ladies neck!'], ['>>{HDThoreauFTW} : How can we address border issues? Talk to people who live there, not Donald Trump | The Dallas Morning News | "when it comes to border issues, we should listen to the people living there rather than a New Yorker who thinks eating a taco bowl counts as supporting Hispanics"', '>>{wytxcook} : > Mr. Trump is correct when he says immigration wouldn’t be at the forefront of this presidential campaign if months ago he hadn’t made some bold and necessary statements. And when the withering media storm ensued he did not back down one iota. That tells you the measure of a man. When the so-called experts said he was too brash and outspoken, and that he would fade away, they were proven wrong. We are confident they will be proven wrong again in November when he becomes President of the United States. [National Border Patrol Council Endorses Donald Trump for President](http://www.bpunion.org/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/1824-national-border-patrol-council-endorses-donald-trump-for-president)', '>>{the_glutton} : A border patrol union that would benefit heavily from the wall being build endorsing a candidate that supports a massive expansion of union members? Color me shocked. This is the equivalent of saying Planned Parenthood endorses Hillary Clinton.', '>>{SlicedDicedBeef} : > ...than a New Yorker who thinks eating a taco bowl counts as supporting Hispanics Damn near as funny as a woman born in Illinois who thinks carrying hot sauce in her purse counts as supporting blacks.', '>>{black_flag_4ever} : I live near the border, Obama has never visited my area. He has not seen what his policies have done.', '>>{letdogsvote} : But [Trump loves Hispanics!](http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/10E96/production/_89607296_cincodemayo.jpg)', '>>{arod1978} : Who benefits from open borders? Cartels and liberals that need third world uneducated unskilled voters to vote for them.', '>>{DavesJuicyDouble} : Citizens who live near the border fully support the wall', '>>{HDThoreauFTW} : yes that exact tweet was included in the article.', ">>{evil420pimp} : Think Arizona tried this, pretty sure it didn't go well...", ">>{Haroldluster3} : Yeah, northern liberals don't like when southwesterners tell them the truth about immigration policy. You can criticize trumps ideas, but my liberal friend from upstate NY thought I was being racist when I said the southwest needed better border security. I told her my mom is Mexican, and this rich white girl totally blew me off like I was crazy. That kind of snotty attitude is prevalent amongst liberals and it's not going to win them any votes this election."]]

classify and reply

['>>{EndoExo} : Donald Trump is more closely connected to the Clinton Foundation than Comey.', '>>{trifecta} : Donald Trump Was Mercilessly Trolled By A Scottish Newspaper’s TV Guide', '>>{tosil} : Gallup Economist Jonathon Rothwell Finds Trump Support Linked to Lack of Racial Diversity, not Economic Distress - CityLab', ">>{CraicCocaine} : I can't imagine anything that would possibly upset Donald Trump more than some regional Scottish TV guide trolling him. Why, I imagine when he got his copy in the mail and read it, it made him *very* mad, he has such thin skin!", ">>{ashstronge} : Wow, this is getting hilarious now. What's next- Hilary and Comey are eighth cousins twice removed, so it couldn't possibly be a fair investigation.", '>>{Midnight2012} : Donald Trump’s personal doctor claims GOP front-runner’s health is ‘astonishingly excellent’ — ‘If elected ... will be the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency’', ">>{koproller} : Are you implying that he doesn't have thin skin?", '>>{sunup_scribe} : Many people are saying how naturally healthy Trump looks.', '>>{dlp211} : Flynn offers to testify in Trump-Russia probe in exchange for immunity', '>>{eggsuckingdog} : President Trump: The Inauguration (4pm, BBC One/STV) After a long absence, The Twilight Zone returns with one of its most ambitious, expensive and controversial productions in broadcast history. Sci-fi writers have dabbled often with alternative history stories – among the most common is the “What If The Nazis Had Won The Second World War” setting – but this huge interactive virtual reality project, which will unfold on TV, in the press, and on Twitter over the next four years, sets out to build an ongoing alternative present. The story begins in a nightmarish version of 2017 in which huge sections of the US electorate have somehow been duped into voting to make Donald Trump president. It sounds far-fetched, and it is, but as it goes on it becomes more and more chillingly plausible. Today’s feature-length opener concentrates on the gaudy inauguration of President Trump, and the stirrings of protest and despair surrounding the ceremony, while pundits speculate gravely on what lies ahead. It’s a flawed piece, but a disturbing glimpse of the horrors we could stumble into, if we’re not careful.', '>>{kah0922} : The funny thing about this is that in order for these supposed "connections" to have any meaning, the Clintons would have to be lauding money from the Clinton Foundation. Until there is proof of that, all of these articles are just conspiracy theory bullshit.', ">>{NateGrey} : Wasn't he abusing prescription drugs for a while? He has a textbook case of ADHD. Sad.", '>>{TheRealDL} : Doctor must have been an M.D. because every mental health specialist has said that diagnosing Trump is dangerous.', '>>{Roseking} : Did you know that FBI Director Comey is part of the Political Party Trump is in?', '>>{paranoidadndroid} : I\'m surprised they got the headline right. No "After being threatened by democrats, Flynn forced to testify against fake allegations"', ">>{Id_rather_be_eating} : We'll. That's it. You don't get immunity unless you have someone higher up to turn on.", ">>{holierthanthee} : Be fair - that's *only* when he's molting.", ">>{radicalelation} : Shit, even Fox? It's for sure legit. What a day. After the Senate hearings, Nunes' bullshit being made more obvious, and now this? So much winning.", '>>{meMidFUALL} : More buzzfeed articles getting attention? And you all wonder why the country turned away from the democratic party.', '>>{CornCobbDouglas} : Where can I find out more about his drug abuse?', '>>{sftbert} : 1 minute on Google shows that Coomey resigned from the board prior to being appointed the FBI director. Also, there is no accusation of maleficence by HSBC with regards to the Clinton Foundation. Many of the donors to HSBC had bank accounts with them in Switzerland, since it is a Swiss bank, this should not be terribly shocking that the accounts were there. It is like blaming Ford for a someone running a red light while texting.', '>>{Ionic_Pancakes} : Hm. Well either A: He has nothing of major consequence and is looking to escape what he could be in trouble for during the campaign. Or B: shit is about to get real.', '>>{sunnieskye1} : Did you know Hillary Clinton works in Washington DC, which is where Obama lives? And, oh! Both of them have walked on the White House lawn!!', '>>{TypeCorrectGetBanned} : >Loretta Lynch – then the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Manhattan – reportedly brokered the deal with Holder, that allowed HSBC to pay fines instead of being criminally charged. The settlement was highly criticized, and Lynch and Holder were accused of acting as if the bank was “too big to prosecute,” and people likened the fine (without criminal charges) to a parking ticket. > >James Comey was nominated by Obama for a post on HSBC’s Board of Directors in June 2012, and he was subsequently appointed to the board on March 4, 2013. He served on the HSBC’s Financial System Vulnerabilities Committee. Comey’s appointment was for three years, however, he resigned effective Sept. 4, 2013, following his confirmation to serve as FBI Director. > >Hillary Clinton also benefited from HSBC’s Swiss bank account division during the same time period – leaked files revealed the identities of at least seven donors who were HSBC clients and contributed to the Clinton Foundation – to the tune of $81 million in total contributions.', '>>{canad1anbacon} : What about those bone spurs? I mean supposedly they were bad enough to forbear military service', '>>{HandSack135} : I wonder why the house Intelligence committee is yet to offer immunity...', ">>{willhemphill} : We've been saying this for a while, so one can only hope that this is really when shit hits the fan.", ">>{JoshuaZ1} : You appear to be operating under the assumption that people who disagree with you must be some sort of paid shills. This is inaccurate and unproductive. It also doesn't address any of the points people have made in this thread. Even if it were full of people being paid by CTR or even if they were being paid jointly by CTR, the Illuminati and the Free Masons, it wouldn't alter whether their arguments are valid or not.", '>>{ozabelle} : exclusive neighborhood, exclusive development, standard sales pitch in american real estate.', '>>{Gorgonaut666} : 538 covered this on their podcast the other day - really one of the most interesting bits of data to come out of this election.', ">>{JumpingJazzJam} : That is not e xactly the truth, it is that AA and other minorities and religious groups are blamed for the Trump voters economic distress. The message is you are only poor because those ?????people are in the U.S. and those dern women won't stay home hand limit themselves to cleaning cooking and breeding activities The message is they would be rich and prosperous if only it weren't for all those people with no political or economic power, it is by sheer magic they made the working and middle class whites suffer.", '>>{IrishJoe} : Plus Comey may be of Mexican descent which would prevent him from investigating Clinton without bias. /s', '>>{Leon_Art} : Yes very well done indeed. I did think of Black Mirror a lot this election season.', '>>{Megatron_McLargeHuge} : I was ready to be outraged about the HSBC/FBI connection but a little research revealed he was an outsider appointed to the board to work on compliance after HSBC settled with the DOJ, so his role was oversight. That\'s very different than the "fox running the henhouse" story this implies. Tying this to Clinton is a huge reach. He\'s a political appointee of the same party she\'s running under and of the same President who appointed her. That\'s a much bigger conflict, though unavoidable without a special prosecutor.', ">>{absurdamerica} : The average Trump supporter by in large isn't in economic distress. Source: the article you clearly didn't read.", ">>{JumpingJazzJam} : If you can tell me who owns Gallup, I'll come back and read it. And it is my inclination to not grant credibility to secret operations and organizations.", ">>{uhmmaybe} : I'm not affiliated with CTR. Your post is just very dumb. I mean who actually believes this stuff?", '>>{StairheidCritic} : Your are right, he may not care but this kind of reflects how he is regarded, and if wants his Scottish businesses to flourish (his attitudes have already cost his 2 courses being considered as British Open Golf venues) perhaps he *should* be paying close attention?', ">>{Literally_A_Shill} : I wonder if this extends online as well. I notice a lot of Trump supporters stick to social network sections that don't exactly like interacting with others.", '>>{wvvwvwv} : Tens of millions of people across the country, yet not impacted by economic distress? Not impacted by minorities or immigrants? Not impacted by loss of manufacturing jobs? Not impacted by unemployment? Not impacted by low income? Apparently the only thing that impacts literally tens of millions of people is their "ignorance about immigrants and minorities" according to this garbage "study" that in reality is just a propaganda piece trying to pretend it knows better what is in the hearts of people than the people themselves. Love it when leftists think they know better than the people themselves about why they support Trump. God forbid they ask them because then they couldn\'t run around creating a false narrative where everyone is just an ignorant fuck who knows nothing of minorities and immigrants and that\'s why they support Trump obviously!!! Tens of millions of people, all rac', ">>{Cipote} : Idk, maybe you just are an ignorant fuck. But you wouldn't know you were an ignorant fuck because you're too much of an ignorant fuck.", '>>{DaRudeabides} : This Scottish lady put it [nicely](http://janeygodley.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/trumpcunt800x546.jpg)', ">>{GrandPumba} : You tell him! It's all run by the lizard people!", ">>{alixsyd} : I reeallllyyyyyyy want to know how T_D can possibly spin this. Seriously. I want to shove this in every trump supporter's face and demand an explanation.", '>>{Modsdontknow} : Well this is from 2015 and judging by the wording John Miller probably said that not any doctor.', '>>{wvvwvwv} : Tens of millions of people across the country, not impacted by economic distress, not impacted by minorities or immigrants, not impacted by loss of manufacturing jobs, not impacted by unemployment, not impacted by low income. Only impacted by their "ignorance about immigrants and minorities." Yes, I am the ignorant one for thinking tens of millions of people are not affected by things that literally impact the entire country and are instead impacted only by ignorance of minorities and immigrants. If only everyone could be as enlightened as yourself, where tens of millions of people are all just ignorant and not impacted by things that impact our entire country. Get real kid.', ">>{BeBopBats} : I'm not American and I don't like buzzfeed, but last time I checked nearly 3 million more people voted for the Democrat. So, not sure what you're getting at.", '>>{Apt_5} : Yep lots of flashbacks for me, too; especially to That Waldo Moment and Hated in the Nation.', '>>{Radeal} : That\'s because "what\'s in people\'s hearts" isn\'t based on rational thoughts', ">>{kiloalphakilo} : Ridiculous- Flynn better have lots of good stuff and not hold back if he's getting total immunity", ">>{thewholedamnplanet} : Fake News, all lies, Flynn was just a campaign volunteer, Trump Leader knew he was bad and that's why he fired him and now he's making up Fake News to make Trump Leader look bad. Who won the election? If this is true why is Trump President and you're not? - The_Dumpster_Fire", ">>{Crazymodsarecrazy} : If he doesn't have anything good, they don't have to grant immunity.", ">>{Apt_5} : Certainly explains the feeling I've had since Nov 8th that this can't be reality, can it? It's more believable that I'm actually dreaming about an especially dark episode of The Twilight Zone. Or that we're all being Punk'd.", '>>{papaHans} : Why not, if chief strategist and senior counselor to President-elect is the CEO of Breitbart.', ">>{dazed_and_jaded} : I agree with ya. The study was fine, but the conclusions were off. They used a number of asumptions that are biased at best. They forgot about the whole, willing to commute so my kids can go to better schools even though I'm paying more money for less house situation that surrounds so many republican districts.", '>>{Leon_Art} : yeah.. and Trump is even more surreal than those, I think. Well.. the media helped a whole lot too.', '>>{tosil} : > Tens of millions of people, all rac RAC!', ">>{Huckleberry_Win} : He doesn't have immunity yet. Only offered to talk in exchange for it. We don't know when he did it, but he hasn't found a taker yet. Could be because it just happened, or could be because they don't need his testimony.", '>>{NateGrey} : [Looks like diet pills warped his brain.](http://gawker.com/the-best-theory-of-1992-donald-trump-took-amphetamine-1755299885)', '>>{kanye_likes_rent_boy} : Right cause those in the poorest section of the country are more worried about interracial high fives and not their crushing poverty......tell us more about the wishes of the poor o gated community dweller', '>>{Paul_Manafort} : No. NO. NOOOOO^OOOOO^^OOOO.', '>>{Midnight2012} : Its says all his tests were positive.... Someone should tell this man that this is not a good thing.', '>>{angstybagels} : Woooooie, one of less than 5 times I have upvoted Fox News.', '>>{JoshSwol} : Except, of course, for the heel spurs that only show up when Trump is called upon to serve in the armed forced.', ">>{toekknow} : > To Whom My Concern: That's my favorite part. And looking at the doc's picture in the article, I'm not surprised...", ">>{BadDecisionDino} : The *healthiest individual ever*? Come on, are they even trying? They just happened to find a doctor who speaks in Trump's own verbal style? Paging Dr. John Miller!", ">>{BadDecisionDino} : I heard he has tremendously dense bones. The densest bones! They'd almost be *too* dense if it weren't for his big-league muscles. But very dense, especially the skull, which I hear is very important, it's where your brain is and that's one of the most important muscles in the body.", '>>{jamesroberts} : Healthy people have jowels and are obese. You heard it hear first, folks!', '>>{RobosapienLXIV} : This is what the human centipedes are saying: "What if Flynn offering to testify is bait for the dems and turn this right back on them..... what if he can blow this whole thing wide open in a public hearing under oath."', '>>{MrTu} : So Flynn is the shit ... that hits the fan?', ">>{TheOleRedditAsshole} : I'm just going to assume everyone at T_D is a Russian bot from now on, until proven otherwise.", ">>{raynespark} : I'm guessing that Teddy Roosevelt at 42 was a hell of a lot healthier than DJT today. That's off the top of my head. GWB was physically fit, as was Obama. I could go on, but point made. The way Dr. Bornstein speaks sounds like a ranting egotistical real-estate developer. Wait. Has anyone ever seen this Bornstein and Trump together?", ">>{JoshSwol} : I'm not entirely convinced Dr. Bornstein isn't really John Barron.", '>>{the92jays} : The employees of Gallup own Gallup through an employee stock ownership plan.', '>>{CGYflames01} : Fox you must be confused, This is NOT good for the president. Please go back to reporting the artificial news as per usual.', ">>{FilltheStrait} : Why don't you just evaluate the methodology of the study if you want to critique it? Claiming conspiracy is the weakest argument possible.", ">>{GrandPumba} : Don't go for my nerves. Target the lizard people's nerves!", ">>{grawz} : [Relevant CGP Grey](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rStL7niR7gs) It's interesting to see Trump slowly lose the keys to his power. It's more interesting to see how slowly it's happening considering Trump has what amounts to video game weaknesses, showing the entire world his vulnerable points every time he gets poked. If it goes down like it looks like it's going to (eventually) go down, we might actually see Paul Ryan as POTUS. Considering his healthcare bill made me throw up in my mouth a little, and he's so weak that he can't even do his job with Trump breathing down his neck, I'm guessing that doesn't bode well for any of us.", '>>{007meow} : Senate hearing chases more alleged ties of Russian hacking, offers no proof', ">>{2rio2} : It doesn't look like anything to me.", ">>{QuestionTheNWO} : IDGI Russia isn't a threat to the USA. Idiots that take bribes from Russia are.", ">>{JumpingJazzJam} : I didn't claim a conspiracy I claimed secrecy. As for their work, I stopped reading the well hedged and shaded results and the push polling questions in fact all the questioning is questionable. The just became tool for manipulating and shaping opinions, not reporting opinions of course that had always been an important part of the Gallup organization. They organization and name were sold in the 80s.", '>>{the92jays} : uh... > Gallup today is employee-owned with offices in 25 countries and delivers analytics and advice to help leaders and organizations solve their most pressing problems. http://cba.unl.edu/news/clifton-foundation-gallup-donate-30m-to-unl-cba-for-clifton-strengths-institute/?contentGroup=new_building&regionName=tile', ">>{007meow} : He's trying to confess, it was *his* fault. ~~Daddy~~ Trump had nothing to do with this, that's why the FBI isn't accepting his offer", ">>{007meow} : Which could be a reason as to why they haven't replied back (yet?).", ">>{JumpingJazzJam} : That is actually quite vague, and I notice the date is 2015 and I don't think I have looked for Ownership since around 2009, when I saw so many crazy polls from them. Now I will have to do some more work. This research above does carry the libertarian slant in topic and language and I don't think I will be changing my mind they are primarily a propaganda tool.", '>>{gtg092x} : Will any amount of proof pull you from your safe space?', '>>{Crazymodsarecrazy} : No, if they offer it, and then his testimony is basically nothing, they do NOT have to grant it.', '>>{TheOleRedditAsshole} : Does anybody else read the word, *misled*, as the past tense of missile, the first time through?', '>>{gtg092x} : > Get real kid. He says, standing tall over the adolescent that dare have an opinion.', ">>{salmonchaser} : The Cold War was an ideological battle. Russia is a shithole country that is trying to drag the rest of the world to their level. We can't let them do that.", ">>{DenimPatriot} : > Shit, even Fox? It's for sure legit. I'm not sure the baseline for legitimacy should be anywhere near Fox News.", '>>{thejoshu} : Dunning-Krüger is the *real* campaign manager for Trump.', ">>{HiTechArchaeologist} : *What nefarious blackmail is Obama's Shadow Government holding over Patriot Flynn to illegally compel his testimony?* **Fox News Investigates!**", ">>{lol_wat_mate} : Turned on FNC to see what the spin is and they're reporting on sanctuary cities.", ">>{m-flo} : Do you work for Trump? Because you ignore polls for shitty reasons really well! I'm sure it'll all work out in November! Just like it did for Romney.", ">>{m-flo} : Did you read the article? Obviously not. If you had you'd see that Trump voters aren't poorer or more economically distressed. They're just more racist.", ">>{grawz} : >Russia isn't a threat to the USA. Idiots that take bribes from Russia are. I like your style. Pessimistic vs Optimistic is an outlook, and while either way of seeing things is perfectly valid, one is better for actual success. Politicians gunna bribe, so we have to focus on what we can actually control.", '>>{TyneyTymey} : Ahh! When they start talking about needing immunity - shit starts to get interesting!', ">>{FilltheStrait} : You've still made no point as to why this specific study might be questionable. The data and methods are all freely available, so there's no secrecy to it. The supposed secrecy of the organization otherwise is irrelevant to the merit of this study unless you can actually find a flaw in its methods or results. I'm not suggesting this working paper is without flaws - there certainly might be some - but you'll have to find them in order to criticize it. Otherwise you're saying nothing at all.", ">>{Circumin} : If he has nothing of consequence than nobody that takes their job seriously would offer him immunity. So far, we don't know that anyone has taken him up on his offer.", '>>{stuthulhu} : Michael Flynn is now pushing for immunity, has he gone over to the vaccination squads seeking to give your child autism?', '>>{The_Killing_Road} : I have seen several comments saying it was offered on March 26th, I believe they have essentially turned him down with no answer', '>>{JumpingJazzJam} : I didn\'t have to read anything but the title to know it is dishonest when for e50 y ears the conservataive messaging propaganda has been to link them, to blame the economic distress they were imposing on all working and middle class people. You are poor because of those "others.', ">>{007meow} : If I understand correctly, they haven't *offered* it - rather, Flynn is *asking* for immunity (in exchange for testimony)? Why wouldn't the FBI just subpoena him and get him to testify under oath anyways?", '>>{iStayedAtaHolidayInn} : So far no takers. Could also mean his testimony is redundant and they already have more than enough evidence on the big stuff he wants to divulge to weasel himself out of a prison sentence', '>>{grawz} : May you rest in a deep and dreamless slumber.', '>>{JumpingJazzJam} : I am not a fortune teller and I refuse to consider Donald Trump a Presidential candidate.', ">>{Crazymodsarecrazy} : Correct. It could be they don't need his testimony to handle this. That's why I'm beginning to think he's got something. I think they're probably debating on if it's something they already know or not. Lot of possibilities in the air, honestly.", ">>{ReallySeriouslyNow} : >Why wouldn't the FBI just subpoena him and get him to testify under oath anyways? Because without immunity, he'll just plead the 5th", '>>{JumpingJazzJam} : No, I am curious about that link. I think the polling is separate and that part owned by the employees is that kind of flim flam motivational nonsense kind of Ted conference, all coated in plastic.', '>>{Huckleberry_Win} : If that ends up being the case Flynn is in for a VERY rough ride.', '>>{JumpingJazzJam} : That is a problem why on earth use: "Trump support linked to lack of racial diversity," instead of the instantly understood, "racism not economic inequality motivates Trump voters".', '>>{duckduck_goose} : It looks like a copy paste of the WSJ article.', ">>{RobosapienLXIV} : Of *course* they are, it's either that or those pesky Muslims.", '>>{The_Killing_Road} : March 30th is now my favorite day of the year, beating out Christmas bigly', ">>{RobosapienLXIV} : They're of course saying it's a 23 Mahjong move to show the investigation is a sham.", '>>{silentiumau} : If this man did a tenth of what Hillary Clinton did, he would be in jail. Wait. Cut to commercial, now.', ">>{scrubzork} : Wait ... so are they saying it's fake news that Flynn requested immunity? Or are they saying that Flynn is going to offer fake testimony for immunity? I'd check myself but I don't want to contract brain herpes from that sub.", '>>{Crazymodsarecrazy} : Both. Some are saying one, some are saying the other.', '>>{Shr3kk_Wpg} : How can Flynn implicate the Democrats? Or did u mean he offers to testify and says there was absolutely no contact with the Rissians?', ">>{bassististist} : Let's take a minute and imagine what would happen if Hillary would have collaborated with the Russians... (entire hour flies by)", ">>{SmellGestapo} : They're focusing on James Comey's secret Twitter account. [No, seriously](http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-30/james-comeys-secret-twitter-account-reveals-he-likes-main-stream-media-shills?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29)", ">>{JPNYCE} : Time most likely. Everything in government is a process. They would need to talk to him about what he knows. Figure out a deal, if he has anything worth knowing and that they don't already know. Also making it public right away wouldn't be necessary.", ">>{EByrne} : He won't get immunity *unless* he has lots of good stuff. The FBI isn't as dumb as Trump voters. They don't operate in vague promises and unspecified implications. They'll see what he has and give him immunity in exchange for his testimony if it's worthwhile to their case. No testimony, no immunity.", ">>{tridentgum} : They could interview Trump in jail and act like Trump ain't in jail.", '>>{bassististist} : The first time something really concrete and damaging comes out, all of us not yet banned there need to go post, in a massive flurry of shitposts. On that blessed day, our shitposts will block out the sun.', '>>{Roygbiv856} : From the mere seconds I could stand being in there, the general consensus was that he was set up', '>>{angstybagels} : http://imgur.com/a/0hc1g THAT IS ALL. Laughing my ass off so hard atm...', '>>{Crazymodsarecrazy} : It\'s more of "Even Fox is willing to get in on this bandwagon of clicks and sweet sweet revenue."', ">>{elliotron} : To be fair, I've been calling Fox News a bullshit factory for years.", '>>{batsofburden} : By that point they will pretend Trump never existed & Mike Pence has been president all along. Trump who?', ">>{Crazymodsarecrazy} : That means they don't grant immunity. Oh, and if he's lying under oath, that's an entirely separate crime he can get....LOCKED UP for.", '>>{atdifan17} : if they say "snitches get stitches" in America, what do they say in Russia?', ">>{batsofburden} : I don't understand how Reddit is cool with having such a prominent sub be mostly made up of Russian bots, seems a little weird.", '>>{batsofburden} : We need to hire bots from India to mass shitpost on there.', '>>{MortWellian} : There seems to be a break between news and talent since Ailes left.', '>>{Crazymodsarecrazy} : There were a few posts about it, including a self post or two. It was basically the same thing in all of them.', '>>{Crazymodsarecrazy} : Ha, yeah, I forgot about that one.', '>>{elliotron} : I read the WSJ article. This is sooo sweet.', '>>{matissehenri} : I\'m of the thought that they think he has shit on HIllary that he garnered illegally and that\'s his "story to tell."', ">>{dfecht} : It's not about concocting the *correct* narrative, it's about concocting enough plausible ones that one or some are able to take off on their own organically. Active Measures 101, comrade.", ">>{masterchief7} : If you go on their website it's posted really small towards the bottom. The main story is about Hillary keeping top secret clearance after leaving state. lol", ">>{thinkB4WeSpeak} : Anything that doesn't fall in line with great leader is fake news.", '>>{thinkB4WeSpeak} : Maybe some more people will come out and testify as well.', ">>{cabbage_peddler} : The only reason to make an offer like this is if you think you're at risk of going to prison already. If the no one takes the deal, Flynn should be very worried.", '>>{prostitutepiss} : So the predictions were true! Flynn the rat is about to rat on his treason traitor team that disowned him. Hahahha I love it. And the fact that Fox has to report this too is great. Trump is going down now.', '>>{1LT_Obvious} : While it is nice they even published this on their site, go to [their homepage](http://www.foxnews.com) and tell me what narrative they are pushing right now.', ">>{distinctvagueness} : Now I'm imagining Flynn just chanting lock her up like a madman.", '>>{PM_Intresting_Stuff} : Top comment on a thread from T_D "according to officials with knowledge of the matter" "Flynn has made an offer to testify to the FBI and the House and Senate intelligence committees though his lawyer but has so far found no takers, the officials said." Just more fake news. Disregard.', '>>{patricktherat} : ALL ACCESS PASS: Clinton, aides, kept top-secret clearance long after leaving State, says lawmaker Really focussing on the serious crimes over there.', '>>{CostAquahomeBarreler} : They were okay with politics being full of American bought bots during the primary....', '>>{currently-on-toilet} : Can you just tell me? I never want to give Fox ad traffic', '>>{1LT_Obvious} : This is the names of the stories on their homepage: ALL ACCESS PASS: Clinton, aides, kept top-secret clearance long after leaving State, says lawmaker VIDEO: Gingrich: Why aren\'t Clinton ties part of Russia probe? VIDEO: Trump pushes Clinton-Russia-uranium claims, defends admin VIDEO: Trump calls for investigation into Clintons over Russia EXCLUSIVE Ex-Trump adviser Page rips Russia collusion allegation VIDEO: Former Trump adviser Carter Page denies Russian relationship Trump on Freedom Caucus: \'We must fight them\' Congress OKs Planned Parenthood funding cuts as Pence breaks tie With ObamaCare overhaul sidelined, can Tom Price go it alone? MAKING OF BANNON How he went from Navy man to WH power player In the time since I posted my first comment, they did add "\'A STORY TO TELL\' Flynn in talks to testify if assured of immunity", but it isn\'t even at the top. I have to scroll down on mobile to even see the headline.', '>>{porkchop222} : Fox has this story under a giant banner of Hillary Clinton what a story about her evil staffers are', ">>{crazyike} : He'll get immunity, cop to doing everything himself, and give no indication Trump was involved at all, or anyone else important. It's dismissed as an overzealous staffer and then they pretend the issue is resolved. Flynn goes free, no one else is touched.", '>>{Bacon2001} : I saw some on T_D saying it was to help Trump and he is just going to set the record straight. "Based patriot Flynn going to clear his name ..., he has always been with Trump..."', '>>{Darinen} : Immunity from prosecution. Those exact words. But the communications were no big deal, right Trumpies?', '>>{llllIlllIllIlI} : That literally sounds like Russian propaganda at this point.', '>>{overwet} : Because shadow government. Things are getting fucked up.', ">>{Slapbox} : TIL keeping top secret materials or access when you shouldn't have it is basically jaywalking..", ">>{Slapbox} : Personally I don't think that she did anything wrong, but if we're going to be objective here, you can't just write off one crime entirely because another is worse.", '>>{masterchief7} : I personally think she should be in jail but to put that as the main story and not that General Flynn has offered to testify against Trump is insane.', '>>{Slapbox} : IT was their main story all last night. You think Farkas should be in jail?', '>>{patricktherat} : > IT was their main story all last night. Actually, THIS was their main story: "ALL ACCESS PASS: Clinton, aides, kept top-secret clearance long after leaving State, says lawmaker" For the record I think she is a criminal on many levels but covering her at this moment makes about as much sense as making another christie bridgegate post your top story tomorrow morning.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{dlp211} : Flynn offers to testify in Trump-Russia probe in exchange for immunity', '>>{paranoidadndroid} : I\'m surprised they got the headline right. No "After being threatened by democrats, Flynn forced to testify against fake allegations"', ">>{Id_rather_be_eating} : We'll. That's it. You don't get immunity unless you have someone higher up to turn on.", ">>{radicalelation} : Shit, even Fox? It's for sure legit. What a day. After the Senate hearings, Nunes' bullshit being made more obvious, and now this? So much winning.", '>>{Ionic_Pancakes} : Hm. Well either A: He has nothing of major consequence and is looking to escape what he could be in trouble for during the campaign. Or B: shit is about to get real.', '>>{HandSack135} : I wonder why the house Intelligence committee is yet to offer immunity...', ">>{willhemphill} : We've been saying this for a while, so one can only hope that this is really when shit hits the fan.", ">>{alixsyd} : I reeallllyyyyyyy want to know how T_D can possibly spin this. Seriously. I want to shove this in every trump supporter's face and demand an explanation.", ">>{kiloalphakilo} : Ridiculous- Flynn better have lots of good stuff and not hold back if he's getting total immunity", ">>{thewholedamnplanet} : Fake News, all lies, Flynn was just a campaign volunteer, Trump Leader knew he was bad and that's why he fired him and now he's making up Fake News to make Trump Leader look bad. Who won the election? If this is true why is Trump President and you're not? - The_Dumpster_Fire", ">>{Crazymodsarecrazy} : If he doesn't have anything good, they don't have to grant immunity.", ">>{Huckleberry_Win} : He doesn't have immunity yet. Only offered to talk in exchange for it. We don't know when he did it, but he hasn't found a taker yet. Could be because it just happened, or could be because they don't need his testimony.", '>>{Paul_Manafort} : No. NO. NOOOOO^OOOOO^^OOOO.', '>>{angstybagels} : Woooooie, one of less than 5 times I have upvoted Fox News.', '>>{RobosapienLXIV} : This is what the human centipedes are saying: "What if Flynn offering to testify is bait for the dems and turn this right back on them..... what if he can blow this whole thing wide open in a public hearing under oath."', '>>{MrTu} : So Flynn is the shit ... that hits the fan?', ">>{TheOleRedditAsshole} : I'm just going to assume everyone at T_D is a Russian bot from now on, until proven otherwise.", '>>{CGYflames01} : Fox you must be confused, This is NOT good for the president. Please go back to reporting the artificial news as per usual.', ">>{grawz} : [Relevant CGP Grey](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rStL7niR7gs) It's interesting to see Trump slowly lose the keys to his power. It's more interesting to see how slowly it's happening considering Trump has what amounts to video game weaknesses, showing the entire world his vulnerable points every time he gets poked. If it goes down like it looks like it's going to (eventually) go down, we might actually see Paul Ryan as POTUS. Considering his healthcare bill made me throw up in my mouth a little, and he's so weak that he can't even do his job with Trump breathing down his neck, I'm guessing that doesn't bode well for any of us.", '>>{007meow} : Senate hearing chases more alleged ties of Russian hacking, offers no proof', ">>{2rio2} : It doesn't look like anything to me.", ">>{QuestionTheNWO} : IDGI Russia isn't a threat to the USA. Idiots that take bribes from Russia are.", ">>{007meow} : He's trying to confess, it was *his* fault. ~~Daddy~~ Trump had nothing to do with this, that's why the FBI isn't accepting his offer", ">>{007meow} : Which could be a reason as to why they haven't replied back (yet?).", '>>{Crazymodsarecrazy} : No, if they offer it, and then his testimony is basically nothing, they do NOT have to grant it.', '>>{TheOleRedditAsshole} : Does anybody else read the word, *misled*, as the past tense of missile, the first time through?', ">>{salmonchaser} : The Cold War was an ideological battle. Russia is a shithole country that is trying to drag the rest of the world to their level. We can't let them do that.", ">>{DenimPatriot} : > Shit, even Fox? It's for sure legit. I'm not sure the baseline for legitimacy should be anywhere near Fox News.", ">>{HiTechArchaeologist} : *What nefarious blackmail is Obama's Shadow Government holding over Patriot Flynn to illegally compel his testimony?* **Fox News Investigates!**", ">>{lol_wat_mate} : Turned on FNC to see what the spin is and they're reporting on sanctuary cities.", ">>{grawz} : >Russia isn't a threat to the USA. Idiots that take bribes from Russia are. I like your style. Pessimistic vs Optimistic is an outlook, and while either way of seeing things is perfectly valid, one is better for actual success. Politicians gunna bribe, so we have to focus on what we can actually control.", '>>{TyneyTymey} : Ahh! When they start talking about needing immunity - shit starts to get interesting!', ">>{Circumin} : If he has nothing of consequence than nobody that takes their job seriously would offer him immunity. So far, we don't know that anyone has taken him up on his offer.", '>>{stuthulhu} : Michael Flynn is now pushing for immunity, has he gone over to the vaccination squads seeking to give your child autism?', '>>{The_Killing_Road} : I have seen several comments saying it was offered on March 26th, I believe they have essentially turned him down with no answer', ">>{007meow} : If I understand correctly, they haven't *offered* it - rather, Flynn is *asking* for immunity (in exchange for testimony)? Why wouldn't the FBI just subpoena him and get him to testify under oath anyways?", '>>{iStayedAtaHolidayInn} : So far no takers. Could also mean his testimony is redundant and they already have more than enough evidence on the big stuff he wants to divulge to weasel himself out of a prison sentence', '>>{grawz} : May you rest in a deep and dreamless slumber.', ">>{Crazymodsarecrazy} : Correct. It could be they don't need his testimony to handle this. That's why I'm beginning to think he's got something. I think they're probably debating on if it's something they already know or not. Lot of possibilities in the air, honestly.", ">>{ReallySeriouslyNow} : >Why wouldn't the FBI just subpoena him and get him to testify under oath anyways? Because without immunity, he'll just plead the 5th", '>>{Huckleberry_Win} : If that ends up being the case Flynn is in for a VERY rough ride.', '>>{duckduck_goose} : It looks like a copy paste of the WSJ article.', ">>{RobosapienLXIV} : Of *course* they are, it's either that or those pesky Muslims.", '>>{The_Killing_Road} : March 30th is now my favorite day of the year, beating out Christmas bigly', ">>{RobosapienLXIV} : They're of course saying it's a 23 Mahjong move to show the investigation is a sham.", '>>{silentiumau} : If this man did a tenth of what Hillary Clinton did, he would be in jail. Wait. Cut to commercial, now.', ">>{scrubzork} : Wait ... so are they saying it's fake news that Flynn requested immunity? Or are they saying that Flynn is going to offer fake testimony for immunity? I'd check myself but I don't want to contract brain herpes from that sub.", '>>{Crazymodsarecrazy} : Both. Some are saying one, some are saying the other.', '>>{Shr3kk_Wpg} : How can Flynn implicate the Democrats? Or did u mean he offers to testify and says there was absolutely no contact with the Rissians?', ">>{bassististist} : Let's take a minute and imagine what would happen if Hillary would have collaborated with the Russians... (entire hour flies by)", ">>{SmellGestapo} : They're focusing on James Comey's secret Twitter account. [No, seriously](http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-30/james-comeys-secret-twitter-account-reveals-he-likes-main-stream-media-shills?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29)", ">>{JPNYCE} : Time most likely. Everything in government is a process. They would need to talk to him about what he knows. Figure out a deal, if he has anything worth knowing and that they don't already know. Also making it public right away wouldn't be necessary.", ">>{EByrne} : He won't get immunity *unless* he has lots of good stuff. The FBI isn't as dumb as Trump voters. They don't operate in vague promises and unspecified implications. They'll see what he has and give him immunity in exchange for his testimony if it's worthwhile to their case. No testimony, no immunity.", ">>{tridentgum} : They could interview Trump in jail and act like Trump ain't in jail.", '>>{bassististist} : The first time something really concrete and damaging comes out, all of us not yet banned there need to go post, in a massive flurry of shitposts. On that blessed day, our shitposts will block out the sun.', '>>{Roygbiv856} : From the mere seconds I could stand being in there, the general consensus was that he was set up', '>>{angstybagels} : http://imgur.com/a/0hc1g THAT IS ALL. Laughing my ass off so hard atm...', '>>{Crazymodsarecrazy} : It\'s more of "Even Fox is willing to get in on this bandwagon of clicks and sweet sweet revenue."', ">>{elliotron} : To be fair, I've been calling Fox News a bullshit factory for years.", '>>{batsofburden} : By that point they will pretend Trump never existed & Mike Pence has been president all along. Trump who?', ">>{Crazymodsarecrazy} : That means they don't grant immunity. Oh, and if he's lying under oath, that's an entirely separate crime he can get....LOCKED UP for.", '>>{atdifan17} : if they say "snitches get stitches" in America, what do they say in Russia?', ">>{batsofburden} : I don't understand how Reddit is cool with having such a prominent sub be mostly made up of Russian bots, seems a little weird.", '>>{batsofburden} : We need to hire bots from India to mass shitpost on there.', '>>{MortWellian} : There seems to be a break between news and talent since Ailes left.', '>>{Crazymodsarecrazy} : There were a few posts about it, including a self post or two. It was basically the same thing in all of them.', '>>{Crazymodsarecrazy} : Ha, yeah, I forgot about that one.', '>>{elliotron} : I read the WSJ article. This is sooo sweet.', '>>{matissehenri} : I\'m of the thought that they think he has shit on HIllary that he garnered illegally and that\'s his "story to tell."', ">>{dfecht} : It's not about concocting the *correct* narrative, it's about concocting enough plausible ones that one or some are able to take off on their own organically. Active Measures 101, comrade.", ">>{masterchief7} : If you go on their website it's posted really small towards the bottom. The main story is about Hillary keeping top secret clearance after leaving state. lol", ">>{thinkB4WeSpeak} : Anything that doesn't fall in line with great leader is fake news.", '>>{thinkB4WeSpeak} : Maybe some more people will come out and testify as well.', ">>{cabbage_peddler} : The only reason to make an offer like this is if you think you're at risk of going to prison already. If the no one takes the deal, Flynn should be very worried.", '>>{prostitutepiss} : So the predictions were true! Flynn the rat is about to rat on his treason traitor team that disowned him. Hahahha I love it. And the fact that Fox has to report this too is great. Trump is going down now.', '>>{1LT_Obvious} : While it is nice they even published this on their site, go to [their homepage](http://www.foxnews.com) and tell me what narrative they are pushing right now.', ">>{distinctvagueness} : Now I'm imagining Flynn just chanting lock her up like a madman.", '>>{PM_Intresting_Stuff} : Top comment on a thread from T_D "according to officials with knowledge of the matter" "Flynn has made an offer to testify to the FBI and the House and Senate intelligence committees though his lawyer but has so far found no takers, the officials said." Just more fake news. Disregard.', '>>{patricktherat} : ALL ACCESS PASS: Clinton, aides, kept top-secret clearance long after leaving State, says lawmaker Really focussing on the serious crimes over there.', '>>{CostAquahomeBarreler} : They were okay with politics being full of American bought bots during the primary....', '>>{currently-on-toilet} : Can you just tell me? I never want to give Fox ad traffic', '>>{1LT_Obvious} : This is the names of the stories on their homepage: ALL ACCESS PASS: Clinton, aides, kept top-secret clearance long after leaving State, says lawmaker VIDEO: Gingrich: Why aren\'t Clinton ties part of Russia probe? VIDEO: Trump pushes Clinton-Russia-uranium claims, defends admin VIDEO: Trump calls for investigation into Clintons over Russia EXCLUSIVE Ex-Trump adviser Page rips Russia collusion allegation VIDEO: Former Trump adviser Carter Page denies Russian relationship Trump on Freedom Caucus: \'We must fight them\' Congress OKs Planned Parenthood funding cuts as Pence breaks tie With ObamaCare overhaul sidelined, can Tom Price go it alone? MAKING OF BANNON How he went from Navy man to WH power player In the time since I posted my first comment, they did add "\'A STORY TO TELL\' Flynn in talks to testify if assured of immunity", but it isn\'t even at the top. I have to scroll down on mobile to even see the headline.', '>>{porkchop222} : Fox has this story under a giant banner of Hillary Clinton what a story about her evil staffers are', ">>{crazyike} : He'll get immunity, cop to doing everything himself, and give no indication Trump was involved at all, or anyone else important. It's dismissed as an overzealous staffer and then they pretend the issue is resolved. Flynn goes free, no one else is touched.", '>>{Bacon2001} : I saw some on T_D saying it was to help Trump and he is just going to set the record straight. "Based patriot Flynn going to clear his name ..., he has always been with Trump..."', '>>{Darinen} : Immunity from prosecution. Those exact words. But the communications were no big deal, right Trumpies?', '>>{llllIlllIllIlI} : That literally sounds like Russian propaganda at this point.', '>>{overwet} : Because shadow government. Things are getting fucked up.', ">>{Slapbox} : TIL keeping top secret materials or access when you shouldn't have it is basically jaywalking..", ">>{Slapbox} : Personally I don't think that she did anything wrong, but if we're going to be objective here, you can't just write off one crime entirely because another is worse.", '>>{masterchief7} : I personally think she should be in jail but to put that as the main story and not that General Flynn has offered to testify against Trump is insane.', '>>{Slapbox} : IT was their main story all last night. You think Farkas should be in jail?', '>>{patricktherat} : > IT was their main story all last night. Actually, THIS was their main story: "ALL ACCESS PASS: Clinton, aides, kept top-secret clearance long after leaving State, says lawmaker" For the record I think she is a criminal on many levels but covering her at this moment makes about as much sense as making another christie bridgegate post your top story tomorrow morning.'], ['>>{Midnight2012} : Donald Trump’s personal doctor claims GOP front-runner’s health is ‘astonishingly excellent’ — ‘If elected ... will be the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency’', '>>{sunup_scribe} : Many people are saying how naturally healthy Trump looks.', ">>{NateGrey} : Wasn't he abusing prescription drugs for a while? He has a textbook case of ADHD. Sad.", '>>{TheRealDL} : Doctor must have been an M.D. because every mental health specialist has said that diagnosing Trump is dangerous.', '>>{CornCobbDouglas} : Where can I find out more about his drug abuse?', '>>{canad1anbacon} : What about those bone spurs? I mean supposedly they were bad enough to forbear military service', '>>{Modsdontknow} : Well this is from 2015 and judging by the wording John Miller probably said that not any doctor.', '>>{NateGrey} : [Looks like diet pills warped his brain.](http://gawker.com/the-best-theory-of-1992-donald-trump-took-amphetamine-1755299885)', '>>{Midnight2012} : Its says all his tests were positive.... Someone should tell this man that this is not a good thing.', '>>{JoshSwol} : Except, of course, for the heel spurs that only show up when Trump is called upon to serve in the armed forced.', ">>{toekknow} : > To Whom My Concern: That's my favorite part. And looking at the doc's picture in the article, I'm not surprised...", ">>{BadDecisionDino} : The *healthiest individual ever*? Come on, are they even trying? They just happened to find a doctor who speaks in Trump's own verbal style? Paging Dr. John Miller!", ">>{BadDecisionDino} : I heard he has tremendously dense bones. The densest bones! They'd almost be *too* dense if it weren't for his big-league muscles. But very dense, especially the skull, which I hear is very important, it's where your brain is and that's one of the most important muscles in the body.", '>>{jamesroberts} : Healthy people have jowels and are obese. You heard it hear first, folks!', ">>{raynespark} : I'm guessing that Teddy Roosevelt at 42 was a hell of a lot healthier than DJT today. That's off the top of my head. GWB was physically fit, as was Obama. I could go on, but point made. The way Dr. Bornstein speaks sounds like a ranting egotistical real-estate developer. Wait. Has anyone ever seen this Bornstein and Trump together?", ">>{JoshSwol} : I'm not entirely convinced Dr. Bornstein isn't really John Barron."], ['>>{tosil} : Gallup Economist Jonathon Rothwell Finds Trump Support Linked to Lack of Racial Diversity, not Economic Distress - CityLab', '>>{ozabelle} : exclusive neighborhood, exclusive development, standard sales pitch in american real estate.', '>>{Gorgonaut666} : 538 covered this on their podcast the other day - really one of the most interesting bits of data to come out of this election.', ">>{JumpingJazzJam} : That is not e xactly the truth, it is that AA and other minorities and religious groups are blamed for the Trump voters economic distress. The message is you are only poor because those ?????people are in the U.S. and those dern women won't stay home hand limit themselves to cleaning cooking and breeding activities The message is they would be rich and prosperous if only it weren't for all those people with no political or economic power, it is by sheer magic they made the working and middle class whites suffer.", ">>{absurdamerica} : The average Trump supporter by in large isn't in economic distress. Source: the article you clearly didn't read.", ">>{JumpingJazzJam} : If you can tell me who owns Gallup, I'll come back and read it. And it is my inclination to not grant credibility to secret operations and organizations.", ">>{Literally_A_Shill} : I wonder if this extends online as well. I notice a lot of Trump supporters stick to social network sections that don't exactly like interacting with others.", '>>{wvvwvwv} : Tens of millions of people across the country, yet not impacted by economic distress? Not impacted by minorities or immigrants? Not impacted by loss of manufacturing jobs? Not impacted by unemployment? Not impacted by low income? Apparently the only thing that impacts literally tens of millions of people is their "ignorance about immigrants and minorities" according to this garbage "study" that in reality is just a propaganda piece trying to pretend it knows better what is in the hearts of people than the people themselves. Love it when leftists think they know better than the people themselves about why they support Trump. God forbid they ask them because then they couldn\'t run around creating a false narrative where everyone is just an ignorant fuck who knows nothing of minorities and immigrants and that\'s why they support Trump obviously!!! Tens of millions of people, all rac', ">>{Cipote} : Idk, maybe you just are an ignorant fuck. But you wouldn't know you were an ignorant fuck because you're too much of an ignorant fuck.", ">>{GrandPumba} : You tell him! It's all run by the lizard people!", '>>{wvvwvwv} : Tens of millions of people across the country, not impacted by economic distress, not impacted by minorities or immigrants, not impacted by loss of manufacturing jobs, not impacted by unemployment, not impacted by low income. Only impacted by their "ignorance about immigrants and minorities." Yes, I am the ignorant one for thinking tens of millions of people are not affected by things that literally impact the entire country and are instead impacted only by ignorance of minorities and immigrants. If only everyone could be as enlightened as yourself, where tens of millions of people are all just ignorant and not impacted by things that impact our entire country. Get real kid.', '>>{Radeal} : That\'s because "what\'s in people\'s hearts" isn\'t based on rational thoughts', ">>{dazed_and_jaded} : I agree with ya. The study was fine, but the conclusions were off. They used a number of asumptions that are biased at best. They forgot about the whole, willing to commute so my kids can go to better schools even though I'm paying more money for less house situation that surrounds so many republican districts.", '>>{tosil} : > Tens of millions of people, all rac RAC!', '>>{kanye_likes_rent_boy} : Right cause those in the poorest section of the country are more worried about interracial high fives and not their crushing poverty......tell us more about the wishes of the poor o gated community dweller', '>>{the92jays} : The employees of Gallup own Gallup through an employee stock ownership plan.', ">>{FilltheStrait} : Why don't you just evaluate the methodology of the study if you want to critique it? Claiming conspiracy is the weakest argument possible.", ">>{GrandPumba} : Don't go for my nerves. Target the lizard people's nerves!", ">>{JumpingJazzJam} : I didn't claim a conspiracy I claimed secrecy. As for their work, I stopped reading the well hedged and shaded results and the push polling questions in fact all the questioning is questionable. The just became tool for manipulating and shaping opinions, not reporting opinions of course that had always been an important part of the Gallup organization. They organization and name were sold in the 80s.", '>>{the92jays} : uh... > Gallup today is employee-owned with offices in 25 countries and delivers analytics and advice to help leaders and organizations solve their most pressing problems. http://cba.unl.edu/news/clifton-foundation-gallup-donate-30m-to-unl-cba-for-clifton-strengths-institute/?contentGroup=new_building&regionName=tile', ">>{JumpingJazzJam} : That is actually quite vague, and I notice the date is 2015 and I don't think I have looked for Ownership since around 2009, when I saw so many crazy polls from them. Now I will have to do some more work. This research above does carry the libertarian slant in topic and language and I don't think I will be changing my mind they are primarily a propaganda tool.", '>>{gtg092x} : Will any amount of proof pull you from your safe space?', '>>{gtg092x} : > Get real kid. He says, standing tall over the adolescent that dare have an opinion.', '>>{thejoshu} : Dunning-Krüger is the *real* campaign manager for Trump.', ">>{m-flo} : Do you work for Trump? Because you ignore polls for shitty reasons really well! I'm sure it'll all work out in November! Just like it did for Romney.", ">>{m-flo} : Did you read the article? Obviously not. If you had you'd see that Trump voters aren't poorer or more economically distressed. They're just more racist.", ">>{FilltheStrait} : You've still made no point as to why this specific study might be questionable. The data and methods are all freely available, so there's no secrecy to it. The supposed secrecy of the organization otherwise is irrelevant to the merit of this study unless you can actually find a flaw in its methods or results. I'm not suggesting this working paper is without flaws - there certainly might be some - but you'll have to find them in order to criticize it. Otherwise you're saying nothing at all.", '>>{JumpingJazzJam} : I didn\'t have to read anything but the title to know it is dishonest when for e50 y ears the conservataive messaging propaganda has been to link them, to blame the economic distress they were imposing on all working and middle class people. You are poor because of those "others.', '>>{JumpingJazzJam} : I am not a fortune teller and I refuse to consider Donald Trump a Presidential candidate.', '>>{JumpingJazzJam} : No, I am curious about that link. I think the polling is separate and that part owned by the employees is that kind of flim flam motivational nonsense kind of Ted conference, all coated in plastic.', '>>{JumpingJazzJam} : That is a problem why on earth use: "Trump support linked to lack of racial diversity," instead of the instantly understood, "racism not economic inequality motivates Trump voters".'], ['>>{EndoExo} : Donald Trump is more closely connected to the Clinton Foundation than Comey.', ">>{ashstronge} : Wow, this is getting hilarious now. What's next- Hilary and Comey are eighth cousins twice removed, so it couldn't possibly be a fair investigation.", '>>{kah0922} : The funny thing about this is that in order for these supposed "connections" to have any meaning, the Clintons would have to be lauding money from the Clinton Foundation. Until there is proof of that, all of these articles are just conspiracy theory bullshit.', '>>{Roseking} : Did you know that FBI Director Comey is part of the Political Party Trump is in?', '>>{sftbert} : 1 minute on Google shows that Coomey resigned from the board prior to being appointed the FBI director. Also, there is no accusation of maleficence by HSBC with regards to the Clinton Foundation. Many of the donors to HSBC had bank accounts with them in Switzerland, since it is a Swiss bank, this should not be terribly shocking that the accounts were there. It is like blaming Ford for a someone running a red light while texting.', '>>{sunnieskye1} : Did you know Hillary Clinton works in Washington DC, which is where Obama lives? And, oh! Both of them have walked on the White House lawn!!', '>>{TypeCorrectGetBanned} : >Loretta Lynch – then the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Manhattan – reportedly brokered the deal with Holder, that allowed HSBC to pay fines instead of being criminally charged. The settlement was highly criticized, and Lynch and Holder were accused of acting as if the bank was “too big to prosecute,” and people likened the fine (without criminal charges) to a parking ticket. > >James Comey was nominated by Obama for a post on HSBC’s Board of Directors in June 2012, and he was subsequently appointed to the board on March 4, 2013. He served on the HSBC’s Financial System Vulnerabilities Committee. Comey’s appointment was for three years, however, he resigned effective Sept. 4, 2013, following his confirmation to serve as FBI Director. > >Hillary Clinton also benefited from HSBC’s Swiss bank account division during the same time period – leaked files revealed the identities of at least seven donors who were HSBC clients and contributed to the Clinton Foundation – to the tune of $81 million in total contributions.', ">>{JoshuaZ1} : You appear to be operating under the assumption that people who disagree with you must be some sort of paid shills. This is inaccurate and unproductive. It also doesn't address any of the points people have made in this thread. Even if it were full of people being paid by CTR or even if they were being paid jointly by CTR, the Illuminati and the Free Masons, it wouldn't alter whether their arguments are valid or not.", '>>{IrishJoe} : Plus Comey may be of Mexican descent which would prevent him from investigating Clinton without bias. /s', '>>{Megatron_McLargeHuge} : I was ready to be outraged about the HSBC/FBI connection but a little research revealed he was an outsider appointed to the board to work on compliance after HSBC settled with the DOJ, so his role was oversight. That\'s very different than the "fox running the henhouse" story this implies. Tying this to Clinton is a huge reach. He\'s a political appointee of the same party she\'s running under and of the same President who appointed her. That\'s a much bigger conflict, though unavoidable without a special prosecutor.', ">>{uhmmaybe} : I'm not affiliated with CTR. Your post is just very dumb. I mean who actually believes this stuff?"], ['>>{trifecta} : Donald Trump Was Mercilessly Trolled By A Scottish Newspaper’s TV Guide', ">>{CraicCocaine} : I can't imagine anything that would possibly upset Donald Trump more than some regional Scottish TV guide trolling him. Why, I imagine when he got his copy in the mail and read it, it made him *very* mad, he has such thin skin!", ">>{koproller} : Are you implying that he doesn't have thin skin?", '>>{eggsuckingdog} : President Trump: The Inauguration (4pm, BBC One/STV) After a long absence, The Twilight Zone returns with one of its most ambitious, expensive and controversial productions in broadcast history. Sci-fi writers have dabbled often with alternative history stories – among the most common is the “What If The Nazis Had Won The Second World War” setting – but this huge interactive virtual reality project, which will unfold on TV, in the press, and on Twitter over the next four years, sets out to build an ongoing alternative present. The story begins in a nightmarish version of 2017 in which huge sections of the US electorate have somehow been duped into voting to make Donald Trump president. It sounds far-fetched, and it is, but as it goes on it becomes more and more chillingly plausible. Today’s feature-length opener concentrates on the gaudy inauguration of President Trump, and the stirrings of protest and despair surrounding the ceremony, while pundits speculate gravely on what lies ahead. It’s a flawed piece, but a disturbing glimpse of the horrors we could stumble into, if we’re not careful.', ">>{holierthanthee} : Be fair - that's *only* when he's molting.", '>>{meMidFUALL} : More buzzfeed articles getting attention? And you all wonder why the country turned away from the democratic party.', '>>{Leon_Art} : Yes very well done indeed. I did think of Black Mirror a lot this election season.', '>>{StairheidCritic} : Your are right, he may not care but this kind of reflects how he is regarded, and if wants his Scottish businesses to flourish (his attitudes have already cost his 2 courses being considered as British Open Golf venues) perhaps he *should* be paying close attention?', '>>{DaRudeabides} : This Scottish lady put it [nicely](http://janeygodley.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/trumpcunt800x546.jpg)', ">>{BeBopBats} : I'm not American and I don't like buzzfeed, but last time I checked nearly 3 million more people voted for the Democrat. So, not sure what you're getting at.", '>>{Apt_5} : Yep lots of flashbacks for me, too; especially to That Waldo Moment and Hated in the Nation.', ">>{Apt_5} : Certainly explains the feeling I've had since Nov 8th that this can't be reality, can it? It's more believable that I'm actually dreaming about an especially dark episode of The Twilight Zone. Or that we're all being Punk'd.", '>>{papaHans} : Why not, if chief strategist and senior counselor to President-elect is the CEO of Breitbart.', '>>{Leon_Art} : yeah.. and Trump is even more surreal than those, I think. Well.. the media helped a whole lot too.']]

classify and reply

[">>{kidhumbeats} : For Obama, Syria Chemical Attack Shows Risk of 'Deals With Dictators'", ">>{TinyBaron} : Russia gave their word. I seriously doubt they would have allowed themselves to be made to look like fools. I have my doubts whether Assad or Russia were involved. And judging by the similar reaction to 2013 and even 2003, I think I know why. But then it's 2003 again, and the Neocons [smell blood.](http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-israel-golan-idUSKBN15U2XX)", '>>{DonutPills} : Sony could unveil five new phones, some packing Snapdragon 835, at MWC 2017', '>>{gaardus} : Your question is phrased such that it sounds like a response to the claim "Samsung already released a 4K phone." However, the-mean-memer did not say Samsung released a 4K phone; he said "they" did. Since the article is about Sony (and since [Sony has released a phone with a 4K display](https://www.sonymobile.com/global-en/products/phones/xperia-z5-premium/)), it\'s safe to assume Sony is the company "they" refers to, not Samsung.', '>>{CyberIndustrialist} : There is nothing the US can do at this point. Which is good. Despite the debacle that the Trump presidency is, the one good thing is that is closeness with Russia will likely prohibit him from engaging in WW3 with Iran.', '>>{i-heart-trees} : I hears that the battery life on Samsung phones is just explosive.', ">>{angstybagels} : Trump's gonna have to answer to this soon, he either appeases Russia/Iran, or the GOP.", ">>{orrangearrow} : Unless it's clear Trump has committed to ending the sanctions but is unable to based on political pressure to investigate his ties. If Russia can't get what they pay for and they have ammo on Trump, they'd release it just to throw us into disarray.", ">>{Hillary__Bro} : No. We have the secret service to protect the President and I don't appreciate the innuendo. I have family in law enforcement.", ">>{FigFrontflip} : Unless you do content creation I'd say 4K isn't worth the upgrade. I got mine for editing photos and for that reason alone it was worth it. But gaming can be a nightmare since a beefy GPU is required for AAA games.", ">>{contantofaz} : If America announced a war against Iran, then Russia could send to Iran an army of its own and spoil it just like Russia did in Syria. So if anything would happen, I think it would be a surprise strike only Trump and Israel would know of. Plus, Trump is very much at odds with the UN, NATO, the EU... So yes, Iran is preparing for war. Israel's Netanyahu thinks that if things get bad, Iran could become the target of a nuclear weapon. I find it lovely though that the same fake news media that seemed to cast Iran in terrible light is the one that Trump is rallying against nowadays.", '>>{CyberIndustrialist} : The last year has shown this to be the case......', '>>{kekus_vult} : I think this is the response to Netanjahu in Washington.', ">>{Pugyouup} : I'll never buy a Sony phone again. Sony has my money for gaming now (switched from Microsoft) and I love my PS4. I loved it so much I went and ran out to buy the latest Sony Xperia last year. The phone had problem from day 1 and in the end I had to replace it less than year later with a cheap unlocked Blu phone to finish off my provider's contract. My last phone was an iPhone for that lasted for I think 6 years. Cathartic exercise complete.", '>>{CyberIndustrialist} : Depends what the Russians have on him to keep him on the straight and narrow.', '>>{IczyAlley} : There are no simple solutions to Syria. Imagining that there are is what gets the United States in trouble (and England, France, Russia, the USSR etc).', '>>{FigFrontflip} : Not entirely sure what you are asking here. Did you mean 4K?', ">>{CyberIndustrialist} : >they'd release it just to throw us into disarray. Trump is no doubt worried about this.", '>>{pwomptastic} : “He now counts on the West again to leave him free to kill as long as he does so without chemicals,” Mr. Hof said. “If this is what happens, the U.S. airstrikes of April 7 will go down in history as a one-off, one-time, fire-and-forget gesture that did nothing to counter violent extremism, stop mass homicide or restore the reputation of the U.S.” So we should keep attacking forever? Never enough war, I guess.', ">>{FigFrontflip} : 1080p on a monitor will still look crumby because there isn't an upscale feature. Tv's however do have that, although I cant comment on how good they are at that. My girlfriend got a 4K tv at home and did say the picture is now sharper so I think it's definitely going to be noticeable for 1080p. Hope that helps", '>>{angstybagels} : GOP will love them some Pence, wish they would pivot faster.', ">>{ash286} : Had an Xperia Z3, and it was fantastic... Right up until I smashed it's screen :(", '>>{AkoTehPanda} : >then Russia could send to Iran an army of its own and spoil it just like Russia did in Syria. Spoil it? The syrian civil war is fun to you?', '>>{Darpots} : Battery life and Sony do not go together. My z5 advertised as 2 day battery bearly last 14 hours.', '>>{Freefall84} : I had a z1 and it was so good I went out and bought a z5 as soon as my contract finished.', ">>{Undeadyk} : z2 and z3 had amazing battery life. I have had LG G4, HTC M10 and currently OnePlus 3T and both z2 and z3 are by far the best in terms of battery. Unfortunately sony peaked then and i don't feel like the x series lives up to that.", '>>{TinyBaron} : Now they look like fools to a world audience. Whatever their motives, that alone would have restrained them. Why even use such weapons anyway when regular bombs are just as effective at killing civilians?', '>>{tau-lepton} : >After last week, even former Obama aides assume that he will have to rethink that passage in his memoir. More than 80 civilians were killed in what Western analysts called a sarin attack by Syrian force Days after Trump said he would not try to oust Assad. 1,400 were killed in August 2013', ">>{MBAMBA0} : So tired of people looking at the distractions on the surface and not looking at what's likely going on here The difference between Obama and Trump when it comes to Syria is Obama saw Russia as an enemy, and Trump sees him as a partner.", ">>{kerk15} : Nobody could expect the sites you visit. The dark web for 14 hours doesn't count el chapo", ">>{marindo} : Shame, I'm still using my z3 and I have no problems.", '>>{TinyBaron} : Unless you want an excuse for [regime change.](http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-israel-golan-idUSKBN15U2XX)', '>>{TinyBaron} : The Fox News Viewer was elected President by other Fox News Viewers by repeating Fox News talking points back to them. Apparently this will continue into his Presidency. Especially since the ["Self-funded"](https://youtu.be/O87ix4cVz5g?t=6s) campaign [needed donations.](http://mondoweiss.net/2016/12/republicans-millions-supporters/) I doubt he even realizes why Fox News does what it does and says what it says. He just swallows their talking points hook line and sinker. He thinks he knows everything as a result.', ">>{SpitfireIsDaBestFire} : Iran did start rattling cages with the missile test and this exercise is the same thing. It's just posturing, not preparations for war", ">>{DrDaniels} : You can't prevent Iran from doing military drills, they are a sovereign nation state.", ">>{livecono} : This is very instructive. The establishment has decided they'd rather throw Obama under the bus than even consider the possibility the narrative of the gas attack may be false in some way, even though there is a whole cottage industry of [fake Syrian videos](http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/aleppo-fake-footage-children-five-peopele-arrested-egyptian-police-a7486541.html), even though the greatest reporter in American history said the 2013 attack was staged, even though Iraq WMD, and even though Turkey is the party claiming the gas was sarin rather than chlorine, and they're the ones behind the 2013 attack.", ">>{DrBrotato} : Wouldn't that further the point that they were entangled? Why would Russia publicly go out of its way by proving they were blackmailing him? Wouldn't that hurt future Russia US ties? I think it's more likely that they never voluntarily release anything unless trump reaches a stable position and goes against Vlad. #Noneofthisisnormal", ">>{livecono} : We don't do regime change is a decision that can be made independently of the policy choice on Syria though.", '>>{SarcasticallyAShill} : Children have no more understanding of war than what they see in Call of Duty', '>>{sunshines_fun_time} : Yeah, I think all of us, Iran included, can read the writing in the wall.', ">>{Shiba-Shiba} : The US will not attack any country which can fight back. Hence either 'Sanctioned' or weak countries are America's only targets. Iran knows that very well."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{kidhumbeats} : For Obama, Syria Chemical Attack Shows Risk of 'Deals With Dictators'", ">>{TinyBaron} : Russia gave their word. I seriously doubt they would have allowed themselves to be made to look like fools. I have my doubts whether Assad or Russia were involved. And judging by the similar reaction to 2013 and even 2003, I think I know why. But then it's 2003 again, and the Neocons [smell blood.](http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-israel-golan-idUSKBN15U2XX)", '>>{IczyAlley} : There are no simple solutions to Syria. Imagining that there are is what gets the United States in trouble (and England, France, Russia, the USSR etc).', '>>{pwomptastic} : “He now counts on the West again to leave him free to kill as long as he does so without chemicals,” Mr. Hof said. “If this is what happens, the U.S. airstrikes of April 7 will go down in history as a one-off, one-time, fire-and-forget gesture that did nothing to counter violent extremism, stop mass homicide or restore the reputation of the U.S.” So we should keep attacking forever? Never enough war, I guess.', '>>{TinyBaron} : Now they look like fools to a world audience. Whatever their motives, that alone would have restrained them. Why even use such weapons anyway when regular bombs are just as effective at killing civilians?', '>>{tau-lepton} : >After last week, even former Obama aides assume that he will have to rethink that passage in his memoir. More than 80 civilians were killed in what Western analysts called a sarin attack by Syrian force Days after Trump said he would not try to oust Assad. 1,400 were killed in August 2013', ">>{MBAMBA0} : So tired of people looking at the distractions on the surface and not looking at what's likely going on here The difference between Obama and Trump when it comes to Syria is Obama saw Russia as an enemy, and Trump sees him as a partner.", '>>{TinyBaron} : Unless you want an excuse for [regime change.](http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-israel-golan-idUSKBN15U2XX)', ">>{livecono} : This is very instructive. The establishment has decided they'd rather throw Obama under the bus than even consider the possibility the narrative of the gas attack may be false in some way, even though there is a whole cottage industry of [fake Syrian videos](http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/aleppo-fake-footage-children-five-peopele-arrested-egyptian-police-a7486541.html), even though the greatest reporter in American history said the 2013 attack was staged, even though Iraq WMD, and even though Turkey is the party claiming the gas was sarin rather than chlorine, and they're the ones behind the 2013 attack.", ">>{livecono} : We don't do regime change is a decision that can be made independently of the policy choice on Syria though."], ['>>{CyberIndustrialist} : There is nothing the US can do at this point. Which is good. Despite the debacle that the Trump presidency is, the one good thing is that is closeness with Russia will likely prohibit him from engaging in WW3 with Iran.', ">>{angstybagels} : Trump's gonna have to answer to this soon, he either appeases Russia/Iran, or the GOP.", ">>{orrangearrow} : Unless it's clear Trump has committed to ending the sanctions but is unable to based on political pressure to investigate his ties. If Russia can't get what they pay for and they have ammo on Trump, they'd release it just to throw us into disarray.", ">>{Hillary__Bro} : No. We have the secret service to protect the President and I don't appreciate the innuendo. I have family in law enforcement.", ">>{contantofaz} : If America announced a war against Iran, then Russia could send to Iran an army of its own and spoil it just like Russia did in Syria. So if anything would happen, I think it would be a surprise strike only Trump and Israel would know of. Plus, Trump is very much at odds with the UN, NATO, the EU... So yes, Iran is preparing for war. Israel's Netanyahu thinks that if things get bad, Iran could become the target of a nuclear weapon. I find it lovely though that the same fake news media that seemed to cast Iran in terrible light is the one that Trump is rallying against nowadays.", '>>{CyberIndustrialist} : The last year has shown this to be the case......', '>>{kekus_vult} : I think this is the response to Netanjahu in Washington.', '>>{CyberIndustrialist} : Depends what the Russians have on him to keep him on the straight and narrow.', ">>{CyberIndustrialist} : >they'd release it just to throw us into disarray. Trump is no doubt worried about this.", '>>{angstybagels} : GOP will love them some Pence, wish they would pivot faster.', '>>{AkoTehPanda} : >then Russia could send to Iran an army of its own and spoil it just like Russia did in Syria. Spoil it? The syrian civil war is fun to you?', '>>{TinyBaron} : The Fox News Viewer was elected President by other Fox News Viewers by repeating Fox News talking points back to them. Apparently this will continue into his Presidency. Especially since the ["Self-funded"](https://youtu.be/O87ix4cVz5g?t=6s) campaign [needed donations.](http://mondoweiss.net/2016/12/republicans-millions-supporters/) I doubt he even realizes why Fox News does what it does and says what it says. He just swallows their talking points hook line and sinker. He thinks he knows everything as a result.', ">>{SpitfireIsDaBestFire} : Iran did start rattling cages with the missile test and this exercise is the same thing. It's just posturing, not preparations for war", ">>{DrDaniels} : You can't prevent Iran from doing military drills, they are a sovereign nation state.", ">>{DrBrotato} : Wouldn't that further the point that they were entangled? Why would Russia publicly go out of its way by proving they were blackmailing him? Wouldn't that hurt future Russia US ties? I think it's more likely that they never voluntarily release anything unless trump reaches a stable position and goes against Vlad. #Noneofthisisnormal", '>>{SarcasticallyAShill} : Children have no more understanding of war than what they see in Call of Duty', '>>{sunshines_fun_time} : Yeah, I think all of us, Iran included, can read the writing in the wall.', ">>{Shiba-Shiba} : The US will not attack any country which can fight back. Hence either 'Sanctioned' or weak countries are America's only targets. Iran knows that very well."], ['>>{DonutPills} : Sony could unveil five new phones, some packing Snapdragon 835, at MWC 2017', '>>{gaardus} : Your question is phrased such that it sounds like a response to the claim "Samsung already released a 4K phone." However, the-mean-memer did not say Samsung released a 4K phone; he said "they" did. Since the article is about Sony (and since [Sony has released a phone with a 4K display](https://www.sonymobile.com/global-en/products/phones/xperia-z5-premium/)), it\'s safe to assume Sony is the company "they" refers to, not Samsung.', '>>{i-heart-trees} : I hears that the battery life on Samsung phones is just explosive.', ">>{FigFrontflip} : Unless you do content creation I'd say 4K isn't worth the upgrade. I got mine for editing photos and for that reason alone it was worth it. But gaming can be a nightmare since a beefy GPU is required for AAA games.", ">>{Pugyouup} : I'll never buy a Sony phone again. Sony has my money for gaming now (switched from Microsoft) and I love my PS4. I loved it so much I went and ran out to buy the latest Sony Xperia last year. The phone had problem from day 1 and in the end I had to replace it less than year later with a cheap unlocked Blu phone to finish off my provider's contract. My last phone was an iPhone for that lasted for I think 6 years. Cathartic exercise complete.", '>>{FigFrontflip} : Not entirely sure what you are asking here. Did you mean 4K?', ">>{FigFrontflip} : 1080p on a monitor will still look crumby because there isn't an upscale feature. Tv's however do have that, although I cant comment on how good they are at that. My girlfriend got a 4K tv at home and did say the picture is now sharper so I think it's definitely going to be noticeable for 1080p. Hope that helps", ">>{ash286} : Had an Xperia Z3, and it was fantastic... Right up until I smashed it's screen :(", '>>{Darpots} : Battery life and Sony do not go together. My z5 advertised as 2 day battery bearly last 14 hours.', '>>{Freefall84} : I had a z1 and it was so good I went out and bought a z5 as soon as my contract finished.', ">>{Undeadyk} : z2 and z3 had amazing battery life. I have had LG G4, HTC M10 and currently OnePlus 3T and both z2 and z3 are by far the best in terms of battery. Unfortunately sony peaked then and i don't feel like the x series lives up to that.", ">>{kerk15} : Nobody could expect the sites you visit. The dark web for 14 hours doesn't count el chapo", ">>{marindo} : Shame, I'm still using my z3 and I have no problems."]]

classify and reply

['>>{berniesandersssss} : Tim Kaine attacks Donald Trump over video but struggles to discuss leaked emails of Clinton campaign', ">>{Dominator27} : The Reporting of Trump's PTSD Comments Shows Why His Supporters Hate the Media", '>>{Halfrich} : >Seth Rich was talking to his girlfriend on the phone when a gunman came up behind him, shot him to death, and left without taking anything at all. Rich was in a nice neighborhood that I’m told hadn’t had a murder in six years. The Assange link got eye rolls from the left until he personally offered a $20K reward for any information leading to an arrest.', '>>{Export_portal} : Lenovo Yoga Book copies handwriting off paper notepads - BBC News', ">>{vgsui} : %25 upvoted in less than a minute. Guess who's back!!!", '>>{Grippler} : interesting, I like the idea of being able to write/draw on my computer without having to bring along a separate digitizer, and not covering up the screens visible area.', '>>{Halfrich} : >Take the case of John Ashe, who was choked by his own barbells in June. The U.N. official was on trial for taking bribes from Chinese billionaire David Ng, a.k.a. Ng Lap Seng. Snopes wants you to know it’s a myth that it had anything to do with Hillary and even my buddy Steve Crowder claims, “He wasn’t going to be testifying against Hillary at any time.” The NY Post disagrees and claims that “the prosecutors would have linked Ashe to the Clinton bagman Ng.” This seems likely as an ABC News story from last year reported on Ng’s multiple visits with the Clintons in 1997 when he was photographed having meetings with them. So Ashe is looking at prison time for dealing with a corrupt billionaire who has a history with Hillary Clinton. He could likely negotiate a leaner sentence if he had some information to impart, but he wouldn’t be able to impart it if his windpipe were crushed by a barbell (who the hell gets killed by their own barbell?).', '>>{spellster} : 10 Police Shot 3 Dead by Sniper Fire at BLM Protest Downtown Dallas', '>>{theombudsmen} : Discuss what about them? The only reason people are thinking they have anything salacious is because people keep implying that by putting "leaked" in front of it. Political click-bait (not the story, the tactic). *edit parenthetical', ">>{berniesandersssss} : r/politics was good while it was democratic. Now it's just another [Goebbels](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Goebbels) propaganda machine.", ">>{di11deux} : You've been ranting and raving on this sub for awhile now. Comparing a sub to Nazi propaganda? Come on. Perhaps, it's just a reality that more people support Clinton than Trump or anyone else. It doesn't need to be a conspiracy.", '>>{Halfrich} : >The incredibly sexy Paula Grober was Bill’s interpreter for the deaf back then and she worked with him for about fifteen years. It’s been reported she had told a friend about Bill’s advances and she promptly died in a car accident wherein she was hurled 33 feet through the air. Nobody saw the accident and it happened when she was alone, driving in the dark, with no other cars around.', ">>{OmniaII} : I had one of these in the 90s Forgot the company. It used yellow legal paper as I remember Seiko? Franklin? Probably still have it in my attic. I'm sure the tech is better now. Especially since you can double it as a drawing tablet as well. Mine was pretty good, but I never really got into the note taking -> computer. I found it was better to just use pen and ink.", '>>{sphere2040} : The count is 4. God damn it, stop killing innocent people. Fuck Texas and its scary open carry laws.', ">>{cyanocobalamin} : >Monday's coverage of Donald Trump's speech to veterans is a prime illustration of a trend noticed in September by Salena Zito over at The Atlantic: Some reporters and headline writers are taking Trump's comments very literally rather than attempting to address the substance or trying to plumb what he's really getting at. Trump's supporters are the exact opposite—they're interpreting what he actually means from his rather inarticulate way of saying what he has to say. The gulf between the two cultures has inflamed the anger of Trump supporters over how the media behaves. Translation: Trump supporters are angry at the media for taking Trump at his word.", '>>{-Teekey-} : This is rich, coming from a guy whose been spamming the same attack articles all morning.', ">>{sircool099} : in a country of 300 million+, where there are more legally owned fire arms than people too at this point, yet have less than 100 thousand deaths or even half that a year, i'd say gun control isn't an issue in the slightest.", '>>{The_Write_Stuff} : His supporters hate the media for reporting what he says.', ">>{vgsui} : As sad as his description is, I think it's rather true at this point: https://www.reddit.com/r/undelete/comments/56qgv5/176666968_well_donald_trump_just_threatened_to/", ">>{berniesandersssss} : > negative attack articles ? This is an article from the LA Times about Hillary's leaked emails, something that should concern us all as it shows how rigged the primary was and how compromised our media is. This isn't an attack, it's information that should be read and allow us all to make a more informed decision on 11/8.", '>>{HDRed} : Really?? How can you 100% say this?', '>>{redoverture} : Wacom Bamboo tablets do this with existing tech. Seems like a cheaper alternative than this, but I wonder if anyone has compared the accuracy or usability.', '>>{HighAndOnline} : Calling out police for murdering innocent civilians is completely different from killing innocent police.', '>>{for_the_bold} : As a strong anti-Trump guy, I couldn\'t agree with this article more. There are plenty of truly legitimate avenues for attacking Trump, but taking statements this far out of context is bad. This is the \'throwing the crying baby out of the auditorium\' nonsense again. For example, I\'m still shocked that Trump\'s claim that attacking an Iranian ship "wouldn\'t start a war" never gained traction.', '>>{Halfrich} : >When Whitewater exploded, it became very bad for everyone involved, and that list included Vince Foster and the Clintons. Bill Clinton was being accused of forcing a loan to a woman named Susan McDougal, who facilitated a crummy real estate deal they were involved in. Luckily, Vince shot himself in the mouth before he could drag her down. Though many scoff at the idea he was killed, it is a fact that the Clintons immediately raided his office for incriminating documents.', '>>{WaltBush} : They would probably be less angry about it if the American people got the same chance to, say, take Bill Clinton at his word. But his inartful comments ("frequently - duh, durr, not frequently") get edited out before the video in question *even airs.* Why is that?', ">>{icky_boo} : Man I would buy this thing instantly if it didn't have a ATOM processor.", ">>{HBombthrow} : > Trump's supporters are the exact opposite—they're interpreting what he actually means from his rather inarticulate way of saying what he has to say. Or, in other words, replacing what Trump actually said with what they want to hear", '>>{berniesandersssss} : Back in the primary all of reddit wanted to see Hillary in prison. Now enthusiasm has been lost because Bernie was cheated. There are no conspiracies when it comes to Hillary, only a matter of time before everything about her sordid corrupt anti-democratic life is known.', '>>{sarrock16} : Anyone remember the Fly pentop computer by leapfrog, pretty much the same ocncept 10 years ago ! https://www.amazon.com/LeapFrog-Enterprises-37700-Pentop-Computer/dp/B00099EBHK', '>>{Menachem34} : Great news for the new academic year! I still like to take notes with pen in hand writing.', '>>{esau_cain} : source ? edit: so you delete your post what a coward', '>>{Halfrich} : >They may be corrupt criminals who nabbed incriminating evidence from a guy who just committed suicide, but they had nothing to do with killing the guy who could have made that evidence public. Jon Parnell Walker was an investigator on the case who might have told us more, but he jumped from his apartment balcony to his death.', ">>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : It's coming home to roost now. It seems the only thing that will make gun control possible is when the uppity negro decides HE is going to legally purchase firearms and use them against the govt. when whites do it it's patriotism and fighting tyranny btw.", ">>{-Teekey-} : You're criticizing the sub as being a propaganda machine, then you're spamming your own agenda ad nauseum. Should it be discussed? Of course. It has. There's been plenty of threads about the leaks. You spamming the same topic with as many articles as you can find is something else entirely.", '>>{Halfrich} : >In 1997, while Clinton and his erection were still running the White House, an attractive pregnant woman named Suzanne Coleman committed suicide. This isn’t unusual in and of itself, but people started asking questions when it was discovered she apparently shot herself in the back of the head and had an affair with Bill Clinton when he was attorney general in Arkansas. Was she pregnant with his child?', '>>{Halfrich} : >It seems too evil to be true, but as self-professed hitman for the Clintons Larry Nichols said, “The Clintons are bad people and I did bad things for them.”', ">>{sqrlmasta} : Was it [this Cross Pen CrossPad](https://www.amazon.com/Cross-CrossPad-CP41001-01-Portable-Digital/dp/B00000K1R3)? This is what I had and although I don't have the pad anymore, I do still have the pen that came with it.", ">>{Cabinet_Space} : I'd click this article, but I lost my tin foil hat a week ago.", ">>{vgsui} : I can't or else I'll be banned. There name rhymes with leaky bar and sneaky car", ">>{WaltBush} : They don't feel the same need to report Bill Clinton's comments that Hillary passes out frequently. Those comments hit the cutting room floor.", ">>{OmniaII} : Yes! That's it. It may or may not be in my attic. for $200 I'll search this weekend and ebay that sucker ;)", '>>{JornNER} : we need to fight tyranny! "oh shit.. whoops"', ">>{bmalph182} : What's obviously needed is more good people with guns, that would have stopped it.", '>>{JornNER} : We have the highest murder rate of any developed country by far. The huge number of guns is largely in part due to gun nuts who stockpile them', ">>{OmniaII} : Yes, but that came out about the same time as the PDAs so they didn't catch on. Plus they were/are huge! ^^\\(insert ^^some ^^derogatory ^^mom ^^joke ^^here)", '>>{-Seraph} : Can you say otherwise 100%? How about we all just simmer the fuck down until we learn some facts.', ">>{elcheeserpuff} : As harsh and fucking cynical as this comment is I can't help but seeing truth in it.", ">>{AkirIkasu} : I'm surprised to see this kind of thing come to market. It's not new technology, but it is innovative. That being said, I think that most people realize that having their notes digitized this way doesn't offer many real-world benefits over using a scanner or a good camera. The only real benefit I see is that artists can draw and it will give actual paper-and-pen tactile response. I'm worried about finding ink refills for it, though.", ">>{GearPeople} : I think the issue at hand is that they can dish it out, but they can't receive it.", ">>{DirtyAxe} : It's pretty neat , but having to carry your laptop with you just to take notes , internal storage for the pen could be nice , so the pen will upload whenever you are close enough", ">>{cyanocobalamin} : Bill Clinton isn't running and hasn't been in public office for years.", ">>{-Seraph} : But isn't that 100,000 more deaths there has to be?", '>>{elcheeserpuff} : You have literally zero basis for saying BLM did this.', ">>{KopOut} : A Trump supporter painting an entire group of people based on the actions of a few? Shocking. If you can't see what is wrong with your comment, start trying to figure it out please.", '>>{pentamethylCP} : From what I can tell Wacom requires you to have a subscription to their cloud system if you want to actually be able to export your files as vectors.', '>>{imwithxir} : Maybe they may not like it, but words matter. The history of stigma surrounding PTSD and TBI is tragic, and theres a lot of energy going in to fighting it, which Trump and his supporters are undermining. Trump and his supporters miss the point: Words kill. edit: Reason might have missed the point about stigma, but they deserve kudos for including that insane video of Johnson talking about the same issue, where he also misses the point.', '>>{brummlin} : Damn, I thought his supporters liked him because he "tells it like it is."', '>>{redoverture} : I actually owned the folio for tablet for awhile, never saw the option for vector. If I did I probably would have considered keeping it, must have been from the subscription.', '>>{Halfrich} : >How about Paul Tully? He worked obsessively on Bill’s campaign for president in 1992 and was intimately involved with what went on behind the scenes. He was found dead in his hotel room a few months after Paula Grober was killed.', '>>{Halfrich} : >You know where Donald Trump’s chef is right now? In his kitchen, making a sandwich. The Clintons’ chef is dead. He vanished after going on a hike in June of last year and was eventually found drowned at the bottom of a river.', '>>{pentamethylCP} : Since you have some experience with the software, can you answer a couple of questions? 1) Is the PDF export a vector image (that is, can you zoom in on it without it becoming blurry like a raster image) 2) Can you export several pages to PDF at once you are you stuck clicking export, save, etc for each page?', '>>{johnfrance} : Man who regularly says anti-American and viscerally offence things not given benefit of the doubt in media interpretation of clumsy speech.', ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : This isn't even original tin foil! This has been posted across three different conspiritard sites in the last hour.", ">>{ggamer92} : Confused by your comment. What's wrong with the ATOM chip?", ">>{ayyuslmaous} : It's extremely underpowered. One could get much more for the money", '>>{because_im_boring} : I heard it was because he threatened to go public about Hilarys onion allergy', '>>{Halfrich} : >On Aug. 1 of this year, author Victor Thorn was found with a gunshot to the back of his head on a hiking trip. It was deemed suicide. He had just released the book Why Hillary Shouldn’t Be in the White House. This brings us up to Aug. 4 of this year, three days after Thorn got shot on a mountaintop. Shawn Lucas was found dead on his bathroom floor just like Paul Tully. Lucas was a process server who proudly served Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the DNC with subpoenas accusing them of putting Hillary over Bernie in the primaries instead of remaining neutral.', ">>{WaltBush} : So? Does he not have any insight into Hillary's well-being? (And, if not, why was 60 Minutes interviewing him in the first place?)", '>>{isthisfunforyou719} : Amen. Having worked with Lenovo tablets in both the consumer space and the enterprise level, they are willing to ship hardware barely able to handle day-to-day programs. This machine will struggle with Windows 10 with any decent programs running. Maybe the Android version will be okay. Form factor does look way cool, though I wish they included a slot of the digital pen.', '>>{otterotherotter} : As a writer who clams up in front of a blank word document, this would be completely amazing IF it could convert handwriting to text. As it is, I already own a scanner, thanks.', ">>{AirieFenix} : You should pay to get your manuscript text converted to digital text. I don't know if you can convert your drawings to vector.", '>>{TheTrollingPakistani} : Honestly if Clinton could kill few hundred people and get away with it then she *deserves* to be president. Anyone that smart I would vote for.', '>>{Halfrich} : Is this the typical liberal mindset, or the typical Pakistani mindset to elect people who kill a lot of people and get away with it president?', '>>{cannibalking} : Police kill several unarmed people during routine work and it gets caught on camera (ignoring the fact that this is a pretty normal occurrence.) The national consensus? On "not all cops are bad, this is a non issue." A single black man shoots several police officers in a violent and clearly misguided political response. The national consensus? "WE NEED GUN CONTROL NOW!" Stay rational, America.', '>>{AgentElman} : This article is funny given the flood of posts about bill supposedly attacking the aca for saying its crazy 25 million more people have health insurance.', ">>{HBombthrow} : He misspoke and then *immediately* corrected himself. You're equating that to the media failing to play a game of trying to imagine what wonderful thing is in Donald Trump's head when he says something awful? You also say this while the media is *right now* taking Clinton's comments about Obamacare and twisting them into the worst possible light?", ">>{zero_dgz} : I was really, really stoked for this thing until I learned that the pressure sensitive active stylus doesn't work directly on the screen as well -- only on the keyboard/notepad area. I pretty extensively use the pressure sensitive stylus function on my Thinkpad S1. I would have used the Yoga Book as a much more portable replacement if it had that functionality -- thickness be damned. I think they dropped the ball on that, personally.", ">>{returner_zx9} : It's hardly an organized movement with concrete memberships, so this isn't a helpful distinction. It would make sense that someone with sympathies congruent with BLM would commit this act, however. Not to say that is proof, just a natural line of reasoning.", ">>{zero_dgz} : Not in that form factor you can't. Not being x86 compatible, anyway. Intel has some i5 and i7 models that'll fit in a tablet, but have fun with the heat dissipation and a 30 minute battery life. The minimum thickness for a device using one of those seems to be about what the Surface Pro has achieved. Folded, this entire thing is thinner than just the tablet portion of a Surface Pro.", ">>{WaltBush} : No, he is the candidate's husband. He was speaking about her health after, you know, she collapsed on the street.", '>>{HermitPrime} : This is politics, not conspiracies. Keep your retardation in The_Donald.', ">>{currently___working} : So they don't like exaggerations and extrapolations? Guess they picked the wrong candidate then.", ">>{TheTrollingPakistani} : Neither. If someone could kill thousands of people and get away scott-free that's a person I want to lead my nation, because whoever that individual is he/she must be one of the smartest sons of bitches on earth. And like 99.9999% of Pakistanis I'm a conservative lmao.", ">>{zero_dgz} : If previous Lenovo offerings are any indication you'll be able to buy an OEM quality 100 pack of replacement pen cartridges for around $2 on Alibaba about five seconds after this thing hits the market.", '>>{antisoshal} : This. If you dont like what he said, wait 10 minutes or look for last weeks clips. in 30 days he will have taken or acted out every plausible position.', '>>{Halfrich} : Dozens of people mysteriously dying around a presidential candidate is politics. >You know where Donald Trump’s chef is right now? In his kitchen, making a sandwich. The Clintons’ chef is dead. He vanished after going on a hike in June of last year and was eventually found drowned at the bottom of a river.', ">>{Halfrich} : >If someone could kill thousands of people and get away scott-free that's a person I want to lead my nation lol. That at least explains why Pakistan is such a shit hole. Burnt a couple of Christians lately? Or threw acid on a woman or two?", ">>{AkirIkasu} : Ha! You're probably right about that. Though the quality will probably not be that great (as if the OEM will be that great to begin with) The issue is long-term support though. Those Chinese companies will not want to make them forever.", ">>{KopOut} : Anyone want to bet me what type of gun was used? What the capacity was? Whether the people owned the weapons legally? Oh, by the way, they attacked good guys with guns, trained to use them, and apparently managed to kill four and wound 11 and are still at large... Can't wait to hear what the NRA has to say about this. Also: let's stop fucking killing each other. Condolences to the families of these officers and the people killed by guns every day in this country. Sickening.", ">>{zero_dgz} : Spend $10 on a stockpile of spares and you'll have ink for your stylus long after the battery in the Yoga Book no longer holds a charge. I still have a pill bottle full of about 97 little red replacement Wacom stylus tips from my old x201. I purchased One Quantity of the damn things... Some day I'll find a use for the rest of them. (That was three computers ago.)", '>>{returner_zx9} : Gun laws will not necessarily stop people with criminal intent. If someone wants a gun in this country, they can get one, legally or not. No amount of laws save a search and seizure on every household in the country is going to change that ever.', '>>{twistedcheshire} : Leave it to some idiot to believe a hack job opinion piece.', ">>{ayyuslmaous} : Wow, ridiculous. I didn't realize the actual thickness (or lack thereof) of the laptop, so I automatically assumed a better CPU could be practically fitted in", '>>{ChiefParzival} : IIRC it uses onenote so it can transcode wiring to text', ">>{WaltBush} : > He misspoke and then immediately corrected himself. What's the harm in airing the misstep and letting the public determine his sincerity? Why does he get flattering edits?", '>>{Halfrich} : > You know where Donald Trump’s chef is right now? In his kitchen, making a sandwich. The Clintons’ chef is dead. He vanished after going on a hike in June of last year and was eventually found drowned at the bottom of a river.', '>>{antisoshal} : so, no. Hes not running for office, but I needed a target I can work with and grabbed him.', '>>{WelcomeToBoshwitz} : This is definitely what this is. The same people who were running around screaming about how Clinton called Sanders supporters basement dwellers are throwing a hissy fit when Trump is taken out of context.', ">>{WaltBush} : He's a top operative and intimate relative of the candidate.", '>>{TheTrollingPakistani} : Nah. Just stoned a rapist to death, after I threw a homosexual off a cliff, before I beheaded a atheist!', ">>{sircool099} : i'm guessing that number, i haven't read the last few years but i'm like 75% sure it's way less than that even.", '>>{sircool099} : if they stockpile them, how the hell are they used?', ">>{sedgwickian} : I'm sorry, but the gap between *the words he says* and what he *feels he means* is incredibly important...particularly given the power of speaking from the office of the presidency. This PTSD stuff is only one example, but it's a serious one. Trump's lack of understanding of the complexities of this issue led him to (perhaps unwittingly) reinforce a very damaging set of stereotypes about mental health that actually keeps people from seeking treatment. Trump's careless language contributes to a cultural assumption that adds to the (already too-high) suicide rates for Vets. The media shouldn't stop pointing that out for fear of upsetting Trump's supporters.", ">>{WaltBush} : I'll keep that in mind the next time someone wants to castigate Donald Trump for something Donald Trump Jr. said.", ">>{The_Write_Stuff} : Maybe because most of that tripe is made up by tabloids like Breitbart and RedState. You can't have a rational discussion with people who fabricate an alternate reality, either.", '>>{Halfrich} : >You know where Donald Trump’s chef is right now? In his kitchen, making a sandwich. The Clintons’ chef is dead. He vanished after going on a hike in June of last year and was eventually found drowned at the bottom of a river.', ">>{feralhog} : The 2 shootings that have happened in the last 48 hours are terrible. This is also terrible. It is possible to condemn both police violence and violence against police. I will say, while i 100% condemn this shooting, I'm not surprised. We do a terrible job in this country holding bad officers accountable. It was only a matter of time before someone decided to take justice in their own hands. I'm surprised it took this long to happen, though I greatly wish that it never did.", ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : I'm sure the sandwich Trump's chef is making is a rather soggy one, too.", ">>{antisoshal} : you and me both. I Don't like Hillary, but Trump is a dumpster fire full of plague rats in comparison. Id vote for Teddy Ruxpin to escape a Trump presidency.", ">>{Hardy723} : Yeah, I agree. I think his words were clumsy and that's really his failure here. But there are countless legitimate things to hit him on so this seems petty to me. With that said, Trump is still a fucking moron.", '>>{DefinitelyIngenuous} : Trump supporters take Trump seriously, but not literally. Trump detractors take him literally, but not seriously. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/09/trump-makes-his-case-in-pittsburgh/501335/', '>>{Halfrich} : lol. Stoned a rapist to death? Who did he rape? A goat or a boy?', ">>{HermitPrime} : You keep citing this example like it's some big shocking thing. Like people don't die on hikes unless CIA hitmen are sent after them or something.", '>>{Halfrich} : Still the guy is alive. God Emperor is merciful.', '>>{WaltBush} : Bill Clinton actually *did* say that Hillary passes out "frequently - uh, not frequently." That wasn\'t fabricated by anyone.', '>>{Halfrich} : > They may be corrupt criminals who nabbed incriminating evidence from a guy who just committed suicide, but they had nothing to do with killing the guy who could have made that evidence public. Jon Parnell Walker was an investigator on the case who might have told us more, but he jumped from his apartment balcony to his death.', '>>{CatalyticDragon} : Hey everybody look, I found the problem! ^^^ Highest rate of gun deaths in the developed world - by far. Gun deaths the same as traffic deaths. Guns now kill more 24-34 year olds than traffic accidents. All from a completely preventable problem and somebody says it "isn\'t an issue in the slightest". Genius.', '>>{Halfrich} : Did she need four witnesses to prove she was raped?', '>>{imwithxir} : He wants to talk to vets about PTSD and mental health, and demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of why PTSD is under recognized and under treated with the words and framing he chose. Thats the very issue, its not out of context. Idk about how much more important it is compared to his alarming Iran statement, but to anyone invested in the issue of PTSD in the vet population, or mental health stigma in general, this should warrant attention.', '>>{Halfrich} : >They may be corrupt criminals who nabbed incriminating evidence from a guy who just committed suicide, but they had nothing to do with killing the guy who could have made that evidence public. Jon Parnell Walker was an investigator on the case who might have told us more, but he jumped from his apartment balcony to his death.', ">>{TheTrollingPakistani} : Isn't that how a justice system works? Ya need proof homie.", ">>{J_WalterWeatherman_} : Couldn't agree more. This is exactly where the rabid anti-intellectualism and anti-PC approach of Trump and his supporters gets things dangerously wrong. I think the PC crowd goes way too far in a number of areas, but this is simply not one of them. One of the biggest obstacles of dealing with PTSD/mental health issues of veterans is removing the stigma that they are somehow a failure for being affected by it. And Trump's speech is a perfect example of perpetuating the stigma. If he cared at all about understanding an issue before commenting on it he would know that, but he literally could not care less about learning about an issue before opening his mouth and offering an opinion.", ">>{darwinn_69} : What's funny is I look at all the mainstream media and they are all over his tax returns with this just being a small side article buried at the bottom of the page.", ">>{StewPedidiot} : That's why you use a spotter when weight lifting. It's not unheard of to crush your windpipe with a barbell. Why is that so hard to believe?", '>>{Qunidaye} : I heard he cooked her human chop medium instead of medium rare', ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : I'm assuming that he hasn't had him killed because he's from El Salvador and very cheap since he doesn't have to insure him.", '>>{Halfrich} : God Emperor is very cost effective too, unlike Crooked Stool.', '>>{Cabinet_Space} : Thank you! Now I can #MAGA while reading about how the moon landings were fake and Jewish bankers are plotting to take over the world.', ">>{lillylenore} : BUT ACTUALLY THOUGH, way to send a message to the people 'murica.", '>>{antisoshal} : yes, but his words do not carry the same impact or implication as the actual candidates on issues. You aren\'t actually even trying to discuss an issue, you\'re just grasping at a straw that feels like it should matter to you. Trump has left a human wake of people who have interacted with him relevantly and intimately, and they despise him and have nothing good to say. Those are the people allowed to talk without and NDA. I dont like Hillary on any level, but the abjectly pointless, manufactured and beyond merely speculative nature of the constant howl made by Trump supporters makes me wonder what future any form of intellectualism has in this nation. Trump contradicts himself hourly. Was a lifelong Democrat with virtually no religious affiliation, and yet when he suddenly says EVERYTHING any republican wants to hear despite most of it being implausible or contradictory, all reason is tossed to the wind and you love him for the bullshit he spews. You respond to 1200 different direct criticisms of actual things hes on video saying and doing with "Emails! Benghazi! Shes Sick", none of which even remotely empirically compare. You guys are like intellectual paparazzi now, and if having a Trump presidency means thats whats in store for our nation, a generation of chuckling fear and hearsay mongers that cant tell when their being conned at the grandest level, then we are doomed. We certainly get more dysfunctional crap with Clinton, but electing trump pretty much means we are a nation of dupes who will believe anything and just want to live life in a reality TV show.', '>>{throwawayainteasy} : The gap, in this case, is between the words he said and what you and the media feel he means. He called one group strong (those not suffering from PTSD) strong. That doesn\'t inherently mean he\'s calling the others weak. If I say "cancer survivors are strong" that doesn\'t mean I\'m also saying cancer victims are weak. He\'s said plenty of terrible things this election, but it\'s ridiculous to try to bend over backwards to try to claim this is one of them.', '>>{SedQuisCustodiet} : Trump isn\'t even taken out of context. What seems to me more "taking things out of context" is the criticism of the media in this article. Having said that: I have only read the reporting of the incident in mainstream media. And there IMO the criticism has been valid, namely that Trump\'s comments regrettably play to one of the prejudices that is hindering many with PTSD seeking help - that PTSD is a sign of weakness, not being able to cope, etc.', '>>{TheTrollingPakistani} : LOL. Pakistan and India have some of the best cricket teams on earth...', ">>{WelcomeToBoshwitz} : I think people are taking his intent out of context. I hate hate hate Donald Trump. But I don't think he meant any harm by his statement. He wasn't calling veterans who suffer from PTSD weak with any malintent. He just perpetuated a terrible stereotype. Some in the media are covering that distinction but in some place its not breaking through. And I think that's why some Trump supporters are upset.", ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : I wouldn't call it cost effective when he uses the savings on atomized Cheeto dust for that glow of liver failure.", '>>{StewPedidiot} : Better take the sticker off, you don\'t want anyone thinking your "urban".', '>>{njmaverick} : Yes those damn media outlets keep reporting what deadbeat donald says!', '>>{spru6} : You know I might actually agree that sometimes things shouldn\'t be taken literally. For instance clinton saying she wanted to kill Assange with a drone. But the difference between Clinton saying why can\'t we use a drone in the middle of london and trump saying some military people who commit suicide are weak, is that we\'re judging them on what they most likely meant. Smart well adjusted people to think Clinton literally wanted to use a Drone in downtown london. That\'s insanity. That is not something she would do. But when Trump says "Weak military members kill themselves" it\'s practically guaranteed that he meant people who suffer from PTSD are weak.', '>>{SedQuisCustodiet} : And also: > What is not a legitimate path of criticism is to look at the totality of these comments and suggest that Trump thinks veterans are weak or that he somehow doesn\'t want to support them. And yet, that\'s exactly what happened due to writers deciding to run with "some people can\'t take it" and emphasize it in headlines like \'Trump Suggests that Soldiers with PTSD Aren\'t \'Strong,\'" and the even more weaselly "Trump Appears to Suggest that Veterans with PTSD Are Not \'Strong.\'" In other words, it is unreasonable of the media - nay, unprofessional and partisan of the media - to not overlook the negative aspects of what Trump said and solely focus on the positive main message. This sounds an awful lot like self-censorship of the media to me.', ">>{TheTrollingPakistani} : I presume you're a /r/the_donald poster? And I don't understand ya'll 1 second we are bad guys since we hang rapists next second we are rapists? lol", ">>{WaltBush} : > You aren't actually even trying to discuss an issue, you're just grasping at a straw that feels like it should matter to you. I'm doing no such thing. I'm pointing out how the media's habits - such as, editing out inconvenient comments made by Bill when he's speaking on Hillary's behalf - perpetuates the belief by Trump supporters that the media is treating their candidate unfairly and setting him up. For you to say that this claim is on par with claims that, say, Hillary's eyes rove in different directions, or Hillary can only walk with the aid of a bionic exoskeleton, just goes to show how skittish and insecure her supporters really are. They can't stomach *any* criticism of their campaign, no matter how reasonable. Any form of opposition or concern just is enveloped in a paroxysm about what a horrible candidate Trump is - because that is an *easy* argument to win.", '>>{sedgwickian} : > That doesn\'t inherently mean he\'s calling the others weak. If I say "cancer survivors are strong" that doesn\'t mean I\'m also saying cancer victims are weak. No: that\'s exactly what you imply when you say the survivors are "strong." In point of fact, there\'s been plenty of advocacy against language of "Strength" and "fighting" cancer precisely because it figures those who do not survive as weak and therefore immoral. Again, literally every expert on PTSD has said that this sort of talk does damage to people who might seek treatment. Trump\'s misstatement comes from ignorance , maybe, but that doesn\'t make the effect of what he says any better.', ">>{ellouelle} : > Clintons’ chef He was Dubya's chef, too, why isn't he getting the blame?", ">>{SedQuisCustodiet} : Meanwhile, let's have a look at what Ivana might have to say. Or Marla. Oh no, because Trump has gagged them.", ">>{WaltBush} : I'm sorry, did you have a comment to make on whether the Democratic campaign might be getting frendlier treatment in the editing room than the Republican campaign?", ">>{Halfrich} : Those two aren't mutually exclusive, especially when you have men who witness women getting raped even when they are in groups of four and do nothing.", '>>{wanson} : Being articulate is usually one of the requirements for being President.', ">>{wanson} : > But the difference between Clinton saying why can't we use a drone in the middle of london and trump saying some military people who commit suicide are weak, is that we're judging them on what they most likely meant. The other difference is that one of them is a real quote and one is made up.", ">>{Halfrich} : Probably because there aren't dozens of people who died mysteriously around Dubya?", ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : I dunno. You can get a good buttplug on Ali Express for cheap. I know Cheeto Benito and his followers aren't a fan of the site because of the foreign name, but you can get almost anything there. Except dignity. But neither he nor they seem to need that.", '>>{ellouelle} : Yeah, the guy whose family is telling you to stop forcing them to relive the pain of losing him by dragging his death into your conspiracy nonsense?', ">>{Halfrich} : Oh, Clintons are never cheap. That cigar Billy Boy stuck up Monica's pussy was pretty expensive.", '>>{lolpoliticsthrowaway} : Bullshit. Trump\'s supporters hate "the media" only in the sense that they don\'t like the message being presented by certain outlets. These same people gobble up every little bit of nonsense about "sex tapes" and "advanced alzheimer\'s" but they suddenly hate the media because they run with the narrative from a direct quote? These people hate "the media" because they\'re preferred vendor of the media feeds into their notion that they\'re the smart ones and can\'t be fooled. You\'re too smart to swallow the lies of the lamestream liberal media, now listen to Sean Hannity talk about the elitism of Hillary Clinton while also talking about Trump the blue collar billionaire. Make no mistake, "the media" doesn\'t exist. The world is like a Baskin Robins now, pick your flavor and find the outlet that feeds into what you already believe. Got a bleeding heart? MSNBC and Huffpo to your left. Liberalism is a mental disorder? Fox News and WSJ to your right. Got some questionable ideas about the Jews? Breitbart straight ahead. Take trigger warnings seriously? Mother Jones is down the block. The only thing that all of these places have in common is their devout followers believe all the other outlets are in the tank and duping people. Don\'t worry about confronting opposing opinions, just find the vendor that most matches your position.', '>>{SedQuisCustodiet} : > Maybe they may not like it, but words matter. They also seem to fail to comprehend that a key skill in a successful President is to be articulate and persuasive. Your example is one situation where it is important a President chooses his words wisely, with empathy and understanding. Diplomacy is infamous for the very precise and clear language needed to build bridges and reach common understanding. Policy making is another key task of a President. You can\'t just "of course the policy means A, even though I said B". To be an effective President you must be able to lay out a comprehensive policy or plan and convince Congress, the Administration, other nations, etc to share your view. That is not something you can achieve without being a very clear and precise communicator.', ">>{Halfrich} : What's his family's explanation for the fact that he got shot on the back of his head, and the fact that nothing was taken, and the fact that all this happened in a pretty safe area?", ">>{throwawayainteasy} : [Here's](http://www.nbcnews.com/id/40538918/ns/health-womens_health/t/after-cheating-death-real-challenge-living-begins/) someone recovering from PTSD who says they feel stronger after overcoming the worst it. Can't wait to hear how horrible a person you think they are or how wildly inappropriate or irresponsible you think their language is.", ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : That was 20 years ago, and cigars are commodity items. And you seem to have mistaken the locations used. While the vagina is close to the anus, they are not the same thing. You'll learn that when you reach Biology.", ">>{jonnyp11} : He was shot twice in his back, and was alive until after he was in the hospital. They panicked and shot him after a scuffle. Guns are loud. They didn't want to wait and try their luck with the cops, who said they got there in under 2 minutes. That single street corner has experience a string of mugging s in the past few months. I don't remember if they gave any numbers, but this was the first shooting, and the cops said that area had been having issues lately.", ">>{TheTrollingPakistani} : That never ever happens. He'll my uncle's saw a rapist being crucified in Pakistan one time.", ">>{jonnyp11} : Or you just can't get that last rep, and end up trapped. I did that, and I didn't even have the clips to keep the weights on, but I was in the corner and couldn't move it to get them off. Luckily there were several other people in there, otherwise I probably wouldn't have tried.", '>>{i_saw_a_moose} : You seem to know a lot about Butt Plugs, Simple Jay! Looks like we finally found your area of expertise!', '>>{imwithxir} : Another key leadership quality relevant here would be a desire to be well informed, and an ability to be educated on, the issues you claim to have the best solution for. Presumably, for most people who follow the politics of PTSD, this would be an Aleppo moment.', '>>{wraith5} : A more apt example would have been Hillary calling Bernie supporters basement dwellers and Trump calling military members with ptsd weak. Both were made up spins', ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : Sure do. Sex toys are a burgeoning industry and the usage of them in healthy consensual relationships is at an all time high. Oh, wait, we're you trying to shame me by implying that I personally use them? My my, that's quite homophobic of you to assume that a man would be ashamed to admit to ass play. *tsk tsk*", ">>{i_saw_a_moose} : Hahaha you are just the gift that keeps on giving (taking) Simple Jay! What you do in your free time is none of my business, but just so you know, lots of people find the idea of sticking things up their asses to be extremely repulsive. Doesn't make them homophobic. It's just a matter of taste.", ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : Those folks live a repressed life if they've never explored their kinks, and I feel sad for them. No life is really lived unless it is lived to it's full measure.", ">>{WaltBush} : We don't hate people merely for disagreeing with us.", '>>{HBombthrow} : Eh, reporters do this all the time-- edit out "ums" and "ahs" from quotes, fix typos and spelling errors in written responses. It\'s better to relate what Bill actually meant', '>>{wraith5} : Totally out of context. He misspoke but his point was vets are dying, the VA is failing and he\'s going to fix it....somehow. Gig him on his lack of details but don\'t turn this into "Trump implies military members with PTSD are weak" which has now turned into "Trump said vets that have PTSD are weak!"', '>>{sedgwickian} : Yeah: that\'s not the same thing as telling people who haven\'t experienced PTSD are "strong." But whatever.', '>>{SedQuisCustodiet} : I haven\'t read any articles that took it out of context. I think this article takes the media coverage out of context. Or rather, it is misrepresenting what they criticized Trump for. The Joe Biden response was without a doubt the strongest. Even he though said "I don’t think he was trying to be mean. He is just so thoroughly, completely uninformed." And if you think this is merely the media making a storm in a tea cup, then watch Biden\'s speech. That anger wasn\'t partisan. That anger wasn\'t campaigning. That anger was from knowing more than most what the cost of war is. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/10/4/1577658/-Furious-Joe-Biden-stuns-crowd-unleashes-a-raw-speech-leveling-Donald-Trump-for-his-PTSD-comments', '>>{WaltBush} : They should relate what Trump actually means, then.', ">>{Wetzilla} : > Trump's supporters are the exact opposite—they're interpreting what ~~he actually~~ they want him to mean from his rather inarticulate way of saying what he has to say. Fixed", '>>{HBombthrow} : What he actually meant to say, that is. Which the press does with Trump', '>>{DBDude} : War vet here with friends who have PTSD, and with a small chance I may be living in denial about myself (the common "I feel fine, but sometimes..."). "Can\'t handle it" is pretty much the definition of PTSD. As I said elsewhere: People saw horrible shit, or horrible shit happened to them. Some people can\'t handle that horrible shit and need help, and we call this PTSD (as Carlin said, we\'ve now completely removed the humanity from our description of the condition). This happens to soldiers far more than most people because they tend to experience a lot more horrible shit. Trump\'s perfectly descriptive language is just an excuse for people who can\'t handle the truth to jump on him.', '>>{fullofwind} : I greatly disagree for this issue. PTSD being associated with toughness in anyway diminishes the work attempts of people looking to address this issue. To ignorantly link the two on as big of a platform and with as much authority as a presidential nominee is supposed to have is a major issue. There are more worthy issues to make this stand on Trump and the media, this one was handle as it should have been.', '>>{sedgwickian} : I\'m not attempting to describe your personal experience or that of your friends. I\'m sorry you and they are going through difficult things. I hope you and they get the help you need. But the opposite of "can\'t handle it" is not "strength." In setting those up as opposites, Trump has positioned "can\'t handle it" as weak, an association that goes against any and all clinical definitions of PTSD in a way that actively keeps people from seeking the treatment they need. Again, I don\'t think he actively meant it as a dig on vets (although he\'s done that before). But in his ignorance, even his well-meaning intent is communicated in a way that could do real damage.', '>>{imwithxir} : Im not turning it into that. Anyone who is really interested in resolving the issue would be informed enough on the history of PTSD, stigma, lack of treatment, and suicide to know to not even think of or frame it in the way he did. The context here is that he doesnt understand the fundamentals of the issue he is pretending to advocate for. The stigma he is perpetuating with his words and framing are the primary reason why PTSD is under treated. That is the only context here. He doesnt know what he is talking about, and it is dangerous.', ">>{HardKnocksAlum} : They're called strong because what they're going through is so fucking hard that it is completely understandable to succumb to it. This is not a shot at the people who end up losing to the battle they're fighting. Why is that so hard to understand?", '>>{sedgwickian} : This isn\'t about people who have not "succumbed." It\'s about people who are afraid to admit that they are going through it. Twenty-two vets per day commit suicide. Treatment helps stop people from going to those measures. Are you really saying here that calling someone "strong" rather than, say, an actual, meaningful clinical term like "resilient," is worth perpetuating a negative stereotype that would lead to more suicides? Why is that so hard to understand?', '>>{Wetzilla} : > If I say "cancer survivors are strong" that doesn\'t mean I\'m also saying cancer victims are weak. But he didn\'t say "people who overcome PTSD are strong". I wouldn\'t have an argument with that. It does take a lot of strength and a lot of work to overcome it. What he said was people who don\'t get PTSD are strong. If you said, "The people in this room were exposed to lots of asbestos, and they are strong and didn\'t get cancer, but some people do get cancer from it," then yes, you are implying that people who get cancer from asbestos are weaker than people who don\'t. Did he mean it that way? Maybe not. But words have meaning, and as the president your words have a lot of power and reach. And like with newspapers, people hear the initial comments and not the correction or follow up. There\'s a huge stigma with mental illness in this country, and Trumps comments further that stigma, even if it\'s not eactly what he meant. So it\'s important for a president to be careful and thoughtful about what they say, and Trump clearly isn\'t.', '>>{DBDude} : >But the opposite of "can\'t handle it" is not "strength." It\'s in the definition. Strong enough to handle, not strong enough to handle. Can handle, can\'t handle. >in a way that actively keeps people from seeking the treatment they need. "Couldn\'t handle it" doesn\'t keep people from getting help. Usually it\'s not wanting to admit they have a mental problem due to the general stigma surrounding mental problems. Survivor\'s guilt plays a large part, "My buddy has no legs, and it\'s just in my head, I\'m the lucky one, I shouldn\'t be seeking help. He needs the help." Lastly, soldiers who have guns are absolutely afraid to get help for fear they will be prohibited from owning any guns, or may be in the future if regulations change. I know a few people exactly in that last category. Those are real reasons. Trump using "strong" is not a reason.', ">>{brummlin} : Since he's frequently wrong and frequently contradicting himself, I'd say he's neither accurate nor precise.", '>>{SedQuisCustodiet} : As Biden said: > I don’t think he was trying to be mean. He is just so thoroughly, completely uninformed. I\'m not entirely convinced. I mean, I agree "he wasn\'t calling veterans who suffer from PTSD weak with any malintent". But I thing he has a huge fear of being weak, and this has (very common) resulted in him having a real antipathy for anything that in his eyes smacks of weakness. Hence he mocks a disabled journalist. He performs an impersonation of Hillary being sick. That is what I believe is happening here. And let\'s be honest, these disparaging comments about various groups of citizens is very much a hallmark of Trump. It isn\'t accidental that it is Trump who insults even when he might not mean to - it is simply his autopilot to insult, and he has too little self-control and so he ends up insulting veterans with PTSD. At best this is yet another insult caused by verbal diarrhea. And it may well be more malicious than that, albeit most likely subconsciously so.', '>>{Hardy723} : I am not sure I quite follow. I believe you were disagreeing with me at first but your last sentence confused me a bit. I understand the sensitivity of this issue and that words matter greatly. But I think Trump was sloppy/ignorant here rather than trying to belittle anyone.', '>>{sedgwickian} : Mental health and decisions about care and disclosure are complicated and multifaceted. I do not think that there are Vets out there about to get help who are stopped the minute they hear Trump speak. But the logic behind thinking like "physical disabilities require/deserve more attention than mental ones" comes back to the idea that strong people are capable of handling mental illness on their own. Trump\'s language contributes to that kind of thinking.', '>>{ShakeyBobWillis} : What was wrong with the baby story? In the best context it was still trump making a joke at the expense of one of his supporters instead of just politely asking her to remove him until he settled down.', ">>{wraith5} : It absolutely is turning into that. All the headlines I've seen for the past two days have been one or the other. Your example as well as this article (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/trump-criticizes-veterans-suffering-ptsd-934812) are exactly the proper kind of journalism and due diligence that should have been done and are the kind of articles people would have respected for calling him out properly. Unfortunately, this is just further proof that the media was going for quick and flashy headlines that did not belie the true problem nor did they take the time to criticize him properly.", '>>{theRealRedherring} : this set of instructions would make for an excellent bipolar social disorder. as a leader?..', ">>{DBDude} : No, in this case the stronger (those who can handle it) don't get mental illness at all, by definition. Trump's language is only a problem if you're scared of him winning this election, and need to fabricate anything possible to make him look bad.", ">>{sedgwickian} : We're just going to have to agree to disagree here as we seem to be talking past one another.", '>>{UnicornOnTheJayneCob} : Holy shit. I have never seen VP Biden like that before. He was legitimately, fists-banging-on-the-podium FURIOUS. I guess that if I were trying to give a medal to a soldier like that whose heart was so broken like that, I would be furious, too.', ">>{trekman3} : Whoa, what's this? Signs of intelligent life on /r/politics? A post that critiques the idiotic, *Pravda*-esque anti-Trump propaganda that's been common lately without trying to make it seem like Trump would make a good president? Sweet!", ">>{Lifeform604} : >PTSD being associated with toughness in anyway That appears to be the idea Trump was poking at. Everyone is tough enough to handle it alone, in their own mind, until they find out they hard way that being tough doesn't matter.", '>>{gameoverman1983} : > Make no mistake, "the media" doesn\'t exist. Yes there is no conglomeration of major media outlets that are owned by a small handful of giant corporations. Nothing like this exists.', '>>{lolpoliticsthrowaway} : That\'s not my point at all. My point is people act like "the media" is one tiny little entity that sets a message and that\'s all you get. The people who bitch about the media most vocally whine about it\'s liberal bias, yet Fox News is the highest rated cable news channel. When people complain about the media, they rarely mean this conglomeration of multiple outlets as most of them couldn\'t name them or their relations if they tried. They\'re just blanket complaining about any media outlet that doesn\'t mirror their own world view back at them. This article is exactly that point. For every news outlet you can find saying that Trump thinks only pussies commit suicide, there is another media outlet saying that everyone else is making a mountain out of a mole hill. The same people who hate "the media" because of news like this are gobbling up out of context hit pieces about the opposition like un-poisoned skittles. That\'s the problem, not that there are big media outlets because no shit. The problem is laying the blame of distrust on media on dishonest news stories when these same people happily parrot their own dishonest news stories when it aligns with their own world view.', '>>{gameoverman1983} : So where is the media\'s "fact-checking" when the Hillary campaign continues to peddle the blatant lie that Trump said "All Mexicans are rapists" ? They\'ve been pushing this lie for months. The media are like locusts over every syllable Trump utters, quote-mining him and taking him out of context constantly, but they virtually NEVER scrutinize anything coming from Trump\'s opponents. This is one reason the media is hated. They\'re not even trying to pretend to appear objective anymore.', '>>{gameoverman1983} : > That\'s not my point at all. My point is people act like "the media" is one tiny little entity that sets a message and that\'s all you get. And that\'s true. For roughly 90% of major media (TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, etc.) You\'re getting the opinions approved by about 6 corporations. > yet Fox News is the highest rated cable news channel. Yes, and Fox News has attacked Trump a great deal this election cycle, even into the General. While they are the only major network that consistently attacks Hillary, the Republican pundits are also bashing Trump on there all the time. Fox News is no friend to Trump. >For every news outlet you can find saying that Trump thinks only pussies commit suicide, there is another media outlet saying that everyone else is making a mountain out of a mole hill. Except the outlets debunking everything taken out of context on Trump are usually just small websites or independent blogs. Meanwhile all the major mainstream media outlets ("The Media") peddle the anti-Trump BS smears 24/7.', '>>{lolpoliticsthrowaway} : And again, that would be fine if these people were ALSO decrying the rampant bullshit coming out that favor their political leanings. They\'re not. These people bitch about the media lying to them, and then go on to drool over the lies they like from other media outlets. Don\'t come to me complaining about the dishonest media while you happily smile as another news sources pisses on your leg and tells you it\'s raining. Fox News attacks Trump? No shit, CNN, MSNBC, and all the other major news outlets had plenty of coverage on Benghazi, the email server, Clinton collapsing, etc. but of course those were just puff pieces glossing over the harsher truth amiright? I\'ve yet to see a single Trump supporter come out and say, "hey I support Trump and all but this Breitbart article is just plain wrong." People find the dishonesty they like, and they roll with it.', '>>{gameoverman1983} : Yea people seek out sources that align with their beliefs. No shit. The problem comes when 90% of the major media is constantly shitting on nearly half the population, calling them evil racist bigots for wanting to enforce immigration laws, while constantly spreading bullshit narratives about how oppressed blacks are by racism, etc. etc. If just half the MSM was doing this it would be different but it is practically every major news outlet pushing it. The situation is unacceptable.', ">>{lolpoliticsthrowaway} : No offense, but you're kind of the poster child for this. Looking at your recent history, you're commenting on the Drudge Report story about Bill Clinton's illegitimate son. The exact same story that the Drudge Report itself confirmed was false years ago. If you want to be pissed about the media lying and smearing people, go for it. Don't turn around and be thrilled when someone on your side does it. Be pissed off that you're being lied to no matter who is lying to you.", ">>{gameoverman1983} : I don't know what your point is. Yes, all sides push propaganda. Is this supposed to be a novel revelation? Again the problem is that virtually the entire mainstream media complex are completely hostile to views of a large demographic of the population. (i.e. Trump supporters) ... You seemed to insinuate this was all a figment of their imagination which is nonsense.", ">>{lolpoliticsthrowaway} : My point is that article's suggestion about Trump supporters hating the media because they lie and hype things up is false. They don't care about the lie or the hype, they care about the target. They are completely fine with lies and hype as long as it serves their own purposes. My point is that it's incredibly hypocritical to complain about how unfair the media is in their portrayal of someone, then flock to a different media outlet that's unfair in their portrayal of someone else."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{Dominator27} : The Reporting of Trump's PTSD Comments Shows Why His Supporters Hate the Media", ">>{cyanocobalamin} : >Monday's coverage of Donald Trump's speech to veterans is a prime illustration of a trend noticed in September by Salena Zito over at The Atlantic: Some reporters and headline writers are taking Trump's comments very literally rather than attempting to address the substance or trying to plumb what he's really getting at. Trump's supporters are the exact opposite—they're interpreting what he actually means from his rather inarticulate way of saying what he has to say. The gulf between the two cultures has inflamed the anger of Trump supporters over how the media behaves. Translation: Trump supporters are angry at the media for taking Trump at his word.", '>>{The_Write_Stuff} : His supporters hate the media for reporting what he says.', '>>{for_the_bold} : As a strong anti-Trump guy, I couldn\'t agree with this article more. There are plenty of truly legitimate avenues for attacking Trump, but taking statements this far out of context is bad. This is the \'throwing the crying baby out of the auditorium\' nonsense again. For example, I\'m still shocked that Trump\'s claim that attacking an Iranian ship "wouldn\'t start a war" never gained traction.', '>>{WaltBush} : They would probably be less angry about it if the American people got the same chance to, say, take Bill Clinton at his word. But his inartful comments ("frequently - duh, durr, not frequently") get edited out before the video in question *even airs.* Why is that?', ">>{HBombthrow} : > Trump's supporters are the exact opposite—they're interpreting what he actually means from his rather inarticulate way of saying what he has to say. Or, in other words, replacing what Trump actually said with what they want to hear", ">>{WaltBush} : They don't feel the same need to report Bill Clinton's comments that Hillary passes out frequently. Those comments hit the cutting room floor.", ">>{GearPeople} : I think the issue at hand is that they can dish it out, but they can't receive it.", ">>{cyanocobalamin} : Bill Clinton isn't running and hasn't been in public office for years.", '>>{imwithxir} : Maybe they may not like it, but words matter. The history of stigma surrounding PTSD and TBI is tragic, and theres a lot of energy going in to fighting it, which Trump and his supporters are undermining. Trump and his supporters miss the point: Words kill. edit: Reason might have missed the point about stigma, but they deserve kudos for including that insane video of Johnson talking about the same issue, where he also misses the point.', '>>{brummlin} : Damn, I thought his supporters liked him because he "tells it like it is."', '>>{johnfrance} : Man who regularly says anti-American and viscerally offence things not given benefit of the doubt in media interpretation of clumsy speech.', ">>{WaltBush} : So? Does he not have any insight into Hillary's well-being? (And, if not, why was 60 Minutes interviewing him in the first place?)", '>>{AgentElman} : This article is funny given the flood of posts about bill supposedly attacking the aca for saying its crazy 25 million more people have health insurance.', ">>{HBombthrow} : He misspoke and then *immediately* corrected himself. You're equating that to the media failing to play a game of trying to imagine what wonderful thing is in Donald Trump's head when he says something awful? You also say this while the media is *right now* taking Clinton's comments about Obamacare and twisting them into the worst possible light?", ">>{WaltBush} : No, he is the candidate's husband. He was speaking about her health after, you know, she collapsed on the street.", ">>{currently___working} : So they don't like exaggerations and extrapolations? Guess they picked the wrong candidate then.", '>>{antisoshal} : This. If you dont like what he said, wait 10 minutes or look for last weeks clips. in 30 days he will have taken or acted out every plausible position.', ">>{WaltBush} : > He misspoke and then immediately corrected himself. What's the harm in airing the misstep and letting the public determine his sincerity? Why does he get flattering edits?", '>>{antisoshal} : so, no. Hes not running for office, but I needed a target I can work with and grabbed him.', '>>{WelcomeToBoshwitz} : This is definitely what this is. The same people who were running around screaming about how Clinton called Sanders supporters basement dwellers are throwing a hissy fit when Trump is taken out of context.', ">>{WaltBush} : He's a top operative and intimate relative of the candidate.", ">>{sedgwickian} : I'm sorry, but the gap between *the words he says* and what he *feels he means* is incredibly important...particularly given the power of speaking from the office of the presidency. This PTSD stuff is only one example, but it's a serious one. Trump's lack of understanding of the complexities of this issue led him to (perhaps unwittingly) reinforce a very damaging set of stereotypes about mental health that actually keeps people from seeking treatment. Trump's careless language contributes to a cultural assumption that adds to the (already too-high) suicide rates for Vets. The media shouldn't stop pointing that out for fear of upsetting Trump's supporters.", ">>{WaltBush} : I'll keep that in mind the next time someone wants to castigate Donald Trump for something Donald Trump Jr. said.", ">>{The_Write_Stuff} : Maybe because most of that tripe is made up by tabloids like Breitbart and RedState. You can't have a rational discussion with people who fabricate an alternate reality, either.", ">>{antisoshal} : you and me both. I Don't like Hillary, but Trump is a dumpster fire full of plague rats in comparison. Id vote for Teddy Ruxpin to escape a Trump presidency.", ">>{Hardy723} : Yeah, I agree. I think his words were clumsy and that's really his failure here. But there are countless legitimate things to hit him on so this seems petty to me. With that said, Trump is still a fucking moron.", '>>{DefinitelyIngenuous} : Trump supporters take Trump seriously, but not literally. Trump detractors take him literally, but not seriously. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/09/trump-makes-his-case-in-pittsburgh/501335/', '>>{WaltBush} : Bill Clinton actually *did* say that Hillary passes out "frequently - uh, not frequently." That wasn\'t fabricated by anyone.', '>>{imwithxir} : He wants to talk to vets about PTSD and mental health, and demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of why PTSD is under recognized and under treated with the words and framing he chose. Thats the very issue, its not out of context. Idk about how much more important it is compared to his alarming Iran statement, but to anyone invested in the issue of PTSD in the vet population, or mental health stigma in general, this should warrant attention.', ">>{J_WalterWeatherman_} : Couldn't agree more. This is exactly where the rabid anti-intellectualism and anti-PC approach of Trump and his supporters gets things dangerously wrong. I think the PC crowd goes way too far in a number of areas, but this is simply not one of them. One of the biggest obstacles of dealing with PTSD/mental health issues of veterans is removing the stigma that they are somehow a failure for being affected by it. And Trump's speech is a perfect example of perpetuating the stigma. If he cared at all about understanding an issue before commenting on it he would know that, but he literally could not care less about learning about an issue before opening his mouth and offering an opinion.", ">>{darwinn_69} : What's funny is I look at all the mainstream media and they are all over his tax returns with this just being a small side article buried at the bottom of the page.", '>>{antisoshal} : yes, but his words do not carry the same impact or implication as the actual candidates on issues. You aren\'t actually even trying to discuss an issue, you\'re just grasping at a straw that feels like it should matter to you. Trump has left a human wake of people who have interacted with him relevantly and intimately, and they despise him and have nothing good to say. Those are the people allowed to talk without and NDA. I dont like Hillary on any level, but the abjectly pointless, manufactured and beyond merely speculative nature of the constant howl made by Trump supporters makes me wonder what future any form of intellectualism has in this nation. Trump contradicts himself hourly. Was a lifelong Democrat with virtually no religious affiliation, and yet when he suddenly says EVERYTHING any republican wants to hear despite most of it being implausible or contradictory, all reason is tossed to the wind and you love him for the bullshit he spews. You respond to 1200 different direct criticisms of actual things hes on video saying and doing with "Emails! Benghazi! Shes Sick", none of which even remotely empirically compare. You guys are like intellectual paparazzi now, and if having a Trump presidency means thats whats in store for our nation, a generation of chuckling fear and hearsay mongers that cant tell when their being conned at the grandest level, then we are doomed. We certainly get more dysfunctional crap with Clinton, but electing trump pretty much means we are a nation of dupes who will believe anything and just want to live life in a reality TV show.', '>>{throwawayainteasy} : The gap, in this case, is between the words he said and what you and the media feel he means. He called one group strong (those not suffering from PTSD) strong. That doesn\'t inherently mean he\'s calling the others weak. If I say "cancer survivors are strong" that doesn\'t mean I\'m also saying cancer victims are weak. He\'s said plenty of terrible things this election, but it\'s ridiculous to try to bend over backwards to try to claim this is one of them.', '>>{SedQuisCustodiet} : Trump isn\'t even taken out of context. What seems to me more "taking things out of context" is the criticism of the media in this article. Having said that: I have only read the reporting of the incident in mainstream media. And there IMO the criticism has been valid, namely that Trump\'s comments regrettably play to one of the prejudices that is hindering many with PTSD seeking help - that PTSD is a sign of weakness, not being able to cope, etc.', ">>{WelcomeToBoshwitz} : I think people are taking his intent out of context. I hate hate hate Donald Trump. But I don't think he meant any harm by his statement. He wasn't calling veterans who suffer from PTSD weak with any malintent. He just perpetuated a terrible stereotype. Some in the media are covering that distinction but in some place its not breaking through. And I think that's why some Trump supporters are upset.", '>>{njmaverick} : Yes those damn media outlets keep reporting what deadbeat donald says!', '>>{spru6} : You know I might actually agree that sometimes things shouldn\'t be taken literally. For instance clinton saying she wanted to kill Assange with a drone. But the difference between Clinton saying why can\'t we use a drone in the middle of london and trump saying some military people who commit suicide are weak, is that we\'re judging them on what they most likely meant. Smart well adjusted people to think Clinton literally wanted to use a Drone in downtown london. That\'s insanity. That is not something she would do. But when Trump says "Weak military members kill themselves" it\'s practically guaranteed that he meant people who suffer from PTSD are weak.', '>>{SedQuisCustodiet} : And also: > What is not a legitimate path of criticism is to look at the totality of these comments and suggest that Trump thinks veterans are weak or that he somehow doesn\'t want to support them. And yet, that\'s exactly what happened due to writers deciding to run with "some people can\'t take it" and emphasize it in headlines like \'Trump Suggests that Soldiers with PTSD Aren\'t \'Strong,\'" and the even more weaselly "Trump Appears to Suggest that Veterans with PTSD Are Not \'Strong.\'" In other words, it is unreasonable of the media - nay, unprofessional and partisan of the media - to not overlook the negative aspects of what Trump said and solely focus on the positive main message. This sounds an awful lot like self-censorship of the media to me.', ">>{WaltBush} : > You aren't actually even trying to discuss an issue, you're just grasping at a straw that feels like it should matter to you. I'm doing no such thing. I'm pointing out how the media's habits - such as, editing out inconvenient comments made by Bill when he's speaking on Hillary's behalf - perpetuates the belief by Trump supporters that the media is treating their candidate unfairly and setting him up. For you to say that this claim is on par with claims that, say, Hillary's eyes rove in different directions, or Hillary can only walk with the aid of a bionic exoskeleton, just goes to show how skittish and insecure her supporters really are. They can't stomach *any* criticism of their campaign, no matter how reasonable. Any form of opposition or concern just is enveloped in a paroxysm about what a horrible candidate Trump is - because that is an *easy* argument to win.", '>>{sedgwickian} : > That doesn\'t inherently mean he\'s calling the others weak. If I say "cancer survivors are strong" that doesn\'t mean I\'m also saying cancer victims are weak. No: that\'s exactly what you imply when you say the survivors are "strong." In point of fact, there\'s been plenty of advocacy against language of "Strength" and "fighting" cancer precisely because it figures those who do not survive as weak and therefore immoral. Again, literally every expert on PTSD has said that this sort of talk does damage to people who might seek treatment. Trump\'s misstatement comes from ignorance , maybe, but that doesn\'t make the effect of what he says any better.', ">>{SedQuisCustodiet} : Meanwhile, let's have a look at what Ivana might have to say. Or Marla. Oh no, because Trump has gagged them.", ">>{WaltBush} : I'm sorry, did you have a comment to make on whether the Democratic campaign might be getting frendlier treatment in the editing room than the Republican campaign?", '>>{wanson} : Being articulate is usually one of the requirements for being President.', ">>{wanson} : > But the difference between Clinton saying why can't we use a drone in the middle of london and trump saying some military people who commit suicide are weak, is that we're judging them on what they most likely meant. The other difference is that one of them is a real quote and one is made up.", '>>{lolpoliticsthrowaway} : Bullshit. Trump\'s supporters hate "the media" only in the sense that they don\'t like the message being presented by certain outlets. These same people gobble up every little bit of nonsense about "sex tapes" and "advanced alzheimer\'s" but they suddenly hate the media because they run with the narrative from a direct quote? These people hate "the media" because they\'re preferred vendor of the media feeds into their notion that they\'re the smart ones and can\'t be fooled. You\'re too smart to swallow the lies of the lamestream liberal media, now listen to Sean Hannity talk about the elitism of Hillary Clinton while also talking about Trump the blue collar billionaire. Make no mistake, "the media" doesn\'t exist. The world is like a Baskin Robins now, pick your flavor and find the outlet that feeds into what you already believe. Got a bleeding heart? MSNBC and Huffpo to your left. Liberalism is a mental disorder? Fox News and WSJ to your right. Got some questionable ideas about the Jews? Breitbart straight ahead. Take trigger warnings seriously? Mother Jones is down the block. The only thing that all of these places have in common is their devout followers believe all the other outlets are in the tank and duping people. Don\'t worry about confronting opposing opinions, just find the vendor that most matches your position.', '>>{SedQuisCustodiet} : > Maybe they may not like it, but words matter. They also seem to fail to comprehend that a key skill in a successful President is to be articulate and persuasive. Your example is one situation where it is important a President chooses his words wisely, with empathy and understanding. Diplomacy is infamous for the very precise and clear language needed to build bridges and reach common understanding. Policy making is another key task of a President. You can\'t just "of course the policy means A, even though I said B". To be an effective President you must be able to lay out a comprehensive policy or plan and convince Congress, the Administration, other nations, etc to share your view. That is not something you can achieve without being a very clear and precise communicator.', ">>{throwawayainteasy} : [Here's](http://www.nbcnews.com/id/40538918/ns/health-womens_health/t/after-cheating-death-real-challenge-living-begins/) someone recovering from PTSD who says they feel stronger after overcoming the worst it. Can't wait to hear how horrible a person you think they are or how wildly inappropriate or irresponsible you think their language is.", '>>{imwithxir} : Another key leadership quality relevant here would be a desire to be well informed, and an ability to be educated on, the issues you claim to have the best solution for. Presumably, for most people who follow the politics of PTSD, this would be an Aleppo moment.', '>>{wraith5} : A more apt example would have been Hillary calling Bernie supporters basement dwellers and Trump calling military members with ptsd weak. Both were made up spins', ">>{WaltBush} : We don't hate people merely for disagreeing with us.", '>>{HBombthrow} : Eh, reporters do this all the time-- edit out "ums" and "ahs" from quotes, fix typos and spelling errors in written responses. It\'s better to relate what Bill actually meant', '>>{wraith5} : Totally out of context. He misspoke but his point was vets are dying, the VA is failing and he\'s going to fix it....somehow. Gig him on his lack of details but don\'t turn this into "Trump implies military members with PTSD are weak" which has now turned into "Trump said vets that have PTSD are weak!"', '>>{sedgwickian} : Yeah: that\'s not the same thing as telling people who haven\'t experienced PTSD are "strong." But whatever.', '>>{SedQuisCustodiet} : I haven\'t read any articles that took it out of context. I think this article takes the media coverage out of context. Or rather, it is misrepresenting what they criticized Trump for. The Joe Biden response was without a doubt the strongest. Even he though said "I don’t think he was trying to be mean. He is just so thoroughly, completely uninformed." And if you think this is merely the media making a storm in a tea cup, then watch Biden\'s speech. That anger wasn\'t partisan. That anger wasn\'t campaigning. That anger was from knowing more than most what the cost of war is. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/10/4/1577658/-Furious-Joe-Biden-stuns-crowd-unleashes-a-raw-speech-leveling-Donald-Trump-for-his-PTSD-comments', '>>{WaltBush} : They should relate what Trump actually means, then.', ">>{Wetzilla} : > Trump's supporters are the exact opposite—they're interpreting what ~~he actually~~ they want him to mean from his rather inarticulate way of saying what he has to say. Fixed", '>>{HBombthrow} : What he actually meant to say, that is. Which the press does with Trump', '>>{DBDude} : War vet here with friends who have PTSD, and with a small chance I may be living in denial about myself (the common "I feel fine, but sometimes..."). "Can\'t handle it" is pretty much the definition of PTSD. As I said elsewhere: People saw horrible shit, or horrible shit happened to them. Some people can\'t handle that horrible shit and need help, and we call this PTSD (as Carlin said, we\'ve now completely removed the humanity from our description of the condition). This happens to soldiers far more than most people because they tend to experience a lot more horrible shit. Trump\'s perfectly descriptive language is just an excuse for people who can\'t handle the truth to jump on him.', '>>{fullofwind} : I greatly disagree for this issue. PTSD being associated with toughness in anyway diminishes the work attempts of people looking to address this issue. To ignorantly link the two on as big of a platform and with as much authority as a presidential nominee is supposed to have is a major issue. There are more worthy issues to make this stand on Trump and the media, this one was handle as it should have been.', '>>{sedgwickian} : I\'m not attempting to describe your personal experience or that of your friends. I\'m sorry you and they are going through difficult things. I hope you and they get the help you need. But the opposite of "can\'t handle it" is not "strength." In setting those up as opposites, Trump has positioned "can\'t handle it" as weak, an association that goes against any and all clinical definitions of PTSD in a way that actively keeps people from seeking the treatment they need. Again, I don\'t think he actively meant it as a dig on vets (although he\'s done that before). But in his ignorance, even his well-meaning intent is communicated in a way that could do real damage.', '>>{imwithxir} : Im not turning it into that. Anyone who is really interested in resolving the issue would be informed enough on the history of PTSD, stigma, lack of treatment, and suicide to know to not even think of or frame it in the way he did. The context here is that he doesnt understand the fundamentals of the issue he is pretending to advocate for. The stigma he is perpetuating with his words and framing are the primary reason why PTSD is under treated. That is the only context here. He doesnt know what he is talking about, and it is dangerous.', ">>{HardKnocksAlum} : They're called strong because what they're going through is so fucking hard that it is completely understandable to succumb to it. This is not a shot at the people who end up losing to the battle they're fighting. Why is that so hard to understand?", '>>{sedgwickian} : This isn\'t about people who have not "succumbed." It\'s about people who are afraid to admit that they are going through it. Twenty-two vets per day commit suicide. Treatment helps stop people from going to those measures. Are you really saying here that calling someone "strong" rather than, say, an actual, meaningful clinical term like "resilient," is worth perpetuating a negative stereotype that would lead to more suicides? Why is that so hard to understand?', '>>{Wetzilla} : > If I say "cancer survivors are strong" that doesn\'t mean I\'m also saying cancer victims are weak. But he didn\'t say "people who overcome PTSD are strong". I wouldn\'t have an argument with that. It does take a lot of strength and a lot of work to overcome it. What he said was people who don\'t get PTSD are strong. If you said, "The people in this room were exposed to lots of asbestos, and they are strong and didn\'t get cancer, but some people do get cancer from it," then yes, you are implying that people who get cancer from asbestos are weaker than people who don\'t. Did he mean it that way? Maybe not. But words have meaning, and as the president your words have a lot of power and reach. And like with newspapers, people hear the initial comments and not the correction or follow up. There\'s a huge stigma with mental illness in this country, and Trumps comments further that stigma, even if it\'s not eactly what he meant. So it\'s important for a president to be careful and thoughtful about what they say, and Trump clearly isn\'t.', '>>{DBDude} : >But the opposite of "can\'t handle it" is not "strength." It\'s in the definition. Strong enough to handle, not strong enough to handle. Can handle, can\'t handle. >in a way that actively keeps people from seeking the treatment they need. "Couldn\'t handle it" doesn\'t keep people from getting help. Usually it\'s not wanting to admit they have a mental problem due to the general stigma surrounding mental problems. Survivor\'s guilt plays a large part, "My buddy has no legs, and it\'s just in my head, I\'m the lucky one, I shouldn\'t be seeking help. He needs the help." Lastly, soldiers who have guns are absolutely afraid to get help for fear they will be prohibited from owning any guns, or may be in the future if regulations change. I know a few people exactly in that last category. Those are real reasons. Trump using "strong" is not a reason.', ">>{brummlin} : Since he's frequently wrong and frequently contradicting himself, I'd say he's neither accurate nor precise.", '>>{SedQuisCustodiet} : As Biden said: > I don’t think he was trying to be mean. He is just so thoroughly, completely uninformed. I\'m not entirely convinced. I mean, I agree "he wasn\'t calling veterans who suffer from PTSD weak with any malintent". But I thing he has a huge fear of being weak, and this has (very common) resulted in him having a real antipathy for anything that in his eyes smacks of weakness. Hence he mocks a disabled journalist. He performs an impersonation of Hillary being sick. That is what I believe is happening here. And let\'s be honest, these disparaging comments about various groups of citizens is very much a hallmark of Trump. It isn\'t accidental that it is Trump who insults even when he might not mean to - it is simply his autopilot to insult, and he has too little self-control and so he ends up insulting veterans with PTSD. At best this is yet another insult caused by verbal diarrhea. And it may well be more malicious than that, albeit most likely subconsciously so.', '>>{Hardy723} : I am not sure I quite follow. I believe you were disagreeing with me at first but your last sentence confused me a bit. I understand the sensitivity of this issue and that words matter greatly. But I think Trump was sloppy/ignorant here rather than trying to belittle anyone.', '>>{sedgwickian} : Mental health and decisions about care and disclosure are complicated and multifaceted. I do not think that there are Vets out there about to get help who are stopped the minute they hear Trump speak. But the logic behind thinking like "physical disabilities require/deserve more attention than mental ones" comes back to the idea that strong people are capable of handling mental illness on their own. Trump\'s language contributes to that kind of thinking.', '>>{ShakeyBobWillis} : What was wrong with the baby story? In the best context it was still trump making a joke at the expense of one of his supporters instead of just politely asking her to remove him until he settled down.', ">>{wraith5} : It absolutely is turning into that. All the headlines I've seen for the past two days have been one or the other. Your example as well as this article (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/trump-criticizes-veterans-suffering-ptsd-934812) are exactly the proper kind of journalism and due diligence that should have been done and are the kind of articles people would have respected for calling him out properly. Unfortunately, this is just further proof that the media was going for quick and flashy headlines that did not belie the true problem nor did they take the time to criticize him properly.", '>>{theRealRedherring} : this set of instructions would make for an excellent bipolar social disorder. as a leader?..', ">>{DBDude} : No, in this case the stronger (those who can handle it) don't get mental illness at all, by definition. Trump's language is only a problem if you're scared of him winning this election, and need to fabricate anything possible to make him look bad.", ">>{sedgwickian} : We're just going to have to agree to disagree here as we seem to be talking past one another.", '>>{UnicornOnTheJayneCob} : Holy shit. I have never seen VP Biden like that before. He was legitimately, fists-banging-on-the-podium FURIOUS. I guess that if I were trying to give a medal to a soldier like that whose heart was so broken like that, I would be furious, too.', ">>{trekman3} : Whoa, what's this? Signs of intelligent life on /r/politics? A post that critiques the idiotic, *Pravda*-esque anti-Trump propaganda that's been common lately without trying to make it seem like Trump would make a good president? Sweet!", ">>{Lifeform604} : >PTSD being associated with toughness in anyway That appears to be the idea Trump was poking at. Everyone is tough enough to handle it alone, in their own mind, until they find out they hard way that being tough doesn't matter.", '>>{gameoverman1983} : > Make no mistake, "the media" doesn\'t exist. Yes there is no conglomeration of major media outlets that are owned by a small handful of giant corporations. Nothing like this exists.', '>>{lolpoliticsthrowaway} : That\'s not my point at all. My point is people act like "the media" is one tiny little entity that sets a message and that\'s all you get. The people who bitch about the media most vocally whine about it\'s liberal bias, yet Fox News is the highest rated cable news channel. When people complain about the media, they rarely mean this conglomeration of multiple outlets as most of them couldn\'t name them or their relations if they tried. They\'re just blanket complaining about any media outlet that doesn\'t mirror their own world view back at them. This article is exactly that point. For every news outlet you can find saying that Trump thinks only pussies commit suicide, there is another media outlet saying that everyone else is making a mountain out of a mole hill. The same people who hate "the media" because of news like this are gobbling up out of context hit pieces about the opposition like un-poisoned skittles. That\'s the problem, not that there are big media outlets because no shit. The problem is laying the blame of distrust on media on dishonest news stories when these same people happily parrot their own dishonest news stories when it aligns with their own world view.', '>>{gameoverman1983} : So where is the media\'s "fact-checking" when the Hillary campaign continues to peddle the blatant lie that Trump said "All Mexicans are rapists" ? They\'ve been pushing this lie for months. The media are like locusts over every syllable Trump utters, quote-mining him and taking him out of context constantly, but they virtually NEVER scrutinize anything coming from Trump\'s opponents. This is one reason the media is hated. They\'re not even trying to pretend to appear objective anymore.', '>>{gameoverman1983} : > That\'s not my point at all. My point is people act like "the media" is one tiny little entity that sets a message and that\'s all you get. And that\'s true. For roughly 90% of major media (TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, etc.) You\'re getting the opinions approved by about 6 corporations. > yet Fox News is the highest rated cable news channel. Yes, and Fox News has attacked Trump a great deal this election cycle, even into the General. While they are the only major network that consistently attacks Hillary, the Republican pundits are also bashing Trump on there all the time. Fox News is no friend to Trump. >For every news outlet you can find saying that Trump thinks only pussies commit suicide, there is another media outlet saying that everyone else is making a mountain out of a mole hill. Except the outlets debunking everything taken out of context on Trump are usually just small websites or independent blogs. Meanwhile all the major mainstream media outlets ("The Media") peddle the anti-Trump BS smears 24/7.', '>>{lolpoliticsthrowaway} : And again, that would be fine if these people were ALSO decrying the rampant bullshit coming out that favor their political leanings. They\'re not. These people bitch about the media lying to them, and then go on to drool over the lies they like from other media outlets. Don\'t come to me complaining about the dishonest media while you happily smile as another news sources pisses on your leg and tells you it\'s raining. Fox News attacks Trump? No shit, CNN, MSNBC, and all the other major news outlets had plenty of coverage on Benghazi, the email server, Clinton collapsing, etc. but of course those were just puff pieces glossing over the harsher truth amiright? I\'ve yet to see a single Trump supporter come out and say, "hey I support Trump and all but this Breitbart article is just plain wrong." People find the dishonesty they like, and they roll with it.', '>>{gameoverman1983} : Yea people seek out sources that align with their beliefs. No shit. The problem comes when 90% of the major media is constantly shitting on nearly half the population, calling them evil racist bigots for wanting to enforce immigration laws, while constantly spreading bullshit narratives about how oppressed blacks are by racism, etc. etc. If just half the MSM was doing this it would be different but it is practically every major news outlet pushing it. The situation is unacceptable.', ">>{lolpoliticsthrowaway} : No offense, but you're kind of the poster child for this. Looking at your recent history, you're commenting on the Drudge Report story about Bill Clinton's illegitimate son. The exact same story that the Drudge Report itself confirmed was false years ago. If you want to be pissed about the media lying and smearing people, go for it. Don't turn around and be thrilled when someone on your side does it. Be pissed off that you're being lied to no matter who is lying to you.", ">>{gameoverman1983} : I don't know what your point is. Yes, all sides push propaganda. Is this supposed to be a novel revelation? Again the problem is that virtually the entire mainstream media complex are completely hostile to views of a large demographic of the population. (i.e. Trump supporters) ... You seemed to insinuate this was all a figment of their imagination which is nonsense.", ">>{lolpoliticsthrowaway} : My point is that article's suggestion about Trump supporters hating the media because they lie and hype things up is false. They don't care about the lie or the hype, they care about the target. They are completely fine with lies and hype as long as it serves their own purposes. My point is that it's incredibly hypocritical to complain about how unfair the media is in their portrayal of someone, then flock to a different media outlet that's unfair in their portrayal of someone else."], ['>>{spellster} : 10 Police Shot 3 Dead by Sniper Fire at BLM Protest Downtown Dallas', '>>{sphere2040} : The count is 4. God damn it, stop killing innocent people. Fuck Texas and its scary open carry laws.', ">>{sircool099} : in a country of 300 million+, where there are more legally owned fire arms than people too at this point, yet have less than 100 thousand deaths or even half that a year, i'd say gun control isn't an issue in the slightest.", '>>{HDRed} : Really?? How can you 100% say this?', '>>{HighAndOnline} : Calling out police for murdering innocent civilians is completely different from killing innocent police.', '>>{esau_cain} : source ? edit: so you delete your post what a coward', ">>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : It's coming home to roost now. It seems the only thing that will make gun control possible is when the uppity negro decides HE is going to legally purchase firearms and use them against the govt. when whites do it it's patriotism and fighting tyranny btw.", '>>{JornNER} : we need to fight tyranny! "oh shit.. whoops"', ">>{bmalph182} : What's obviously needed is more good people with guns, that would have stopped it.", '>>{JornNER} : We have the highest murder rate of any developed country by far. The huge number of guns is largely in part due to gun nuts who stockpile them', '>>{-Seraph} : Can you say otherwise 100%? How about we all just simmer the fuck down until we learn some facts.', ">>{elcheeserpuff} : As harsh and fucking cynical as this comment is I can't help but seeing truth in it.", ">>{-Seraph} : But isn't that 100,000 more deaths there has to be?", '>>{elcheeserpuff} : You have literally zero basis for saying BLM did this.', ">>{KopOut} : A Trump supporter painting an entire group of people based on the actions of a few? Shocking. If you can't see what is wrong with your comment, start trying to figure it out please.", '>>{cannibalking} : Police kill several unarmed people during routine work and it gets caught on camera (ignoring the fact that this is a pretty normal occurrence.) The national consensus? On "not all cops are bad, this is a non issue." A single black man shoots several police officers in a violent and clearly misguided political response. The national consensus? "WE NEED GUN CONTROL NOW!" Stay rational, America.', ">>{returner_zx9} : It's hardly an organized movement with concrete memberships, so this isn't a helpful distinction. It would make sense that someone with sympathies congruent with BLM would commit this act, however. Not to say that is proof, just a natural line of reasoning.", ">>{KopOut} : Anyone want to bet me what type of gun was used? What the capacity was? Whether the people owned the weapons legally? Oh, by the way, they attacked good guys with guns, trained to use them, and apparently managed to kill four and wound 11 and are still at large... Can't wait to hear what the NRA has to say about this. Also: let's stop fucking killing each other. Condolences to the families of these officers and the people killed by guns every day in this country. Sickening.", '>>{returner_zx9} : Gun laws will not necessarily stop people with criminal intent. If someone wants a gun in this country, they can get one, legally or not. No amount of laws save a search and seizure on every household in the country is going to change that ever.', ">>{sircool099} : i'm guessing that number, i haven't read the last few years but i'm like 75% sure it's way less than that even.", '>>{sircool099} : if they stockpile them, how the hell are they used?', ">>{feralhog} : The 2 shootings that have happened in the last 48 hours are terrible. This is also terrible. It is possible to condemn both police violence and violence against police. I will say, while i 100% condemn this shooting, I'm not surprised. We do a terrible job in this country holding bad officers accountable. It was only a matter of time before someone decided to take justice in their own hands. I'm surprised it took this long to happen, though I greatly wish that it never did.", '>>{CatalyticDragon} : Hey everybody look, I found the problem! ^^^ Highest rate of gun deaths in the developed world - by far. Gun deaths the same as traffic deaths. Guns now kill more 24-34 year olds than traffic accidents. All from a completely preventable problem and somebody says it "isn\'t an issue in the slightest". Genius.', ">>{lillylenore} : BUT ACTUALLY THOUGH, way to send a message to the people 'murica."], ['>>{Halfrich} : >Seth Rich was talking to his girlfriend on the phone when a gunman came up behind him, shot him to death, and left without taking anything at all. Rich was in a nice neighborhood that I’m told hadn’t had a murder in six years. The Assange link got eye rolls from the left until he personally offered a $20K reward for any information leading to an arrest.', '>>{Halfrich} : >Take the case of John Ashe, who was choked by his own barbells in June. The U.N. official was on trial for taking bribes from Chinese billionaire David Ng, a.k.a. Ng Lap Seng. Snopes wants you to know it’s a myth that it had anything to do with Hillary and even my buddy Steve Crowder claims, “He wasn’t going to be testifying against Hillary at any time.” The NY Post disagrees and claims that “the prosecutors would have linked Ashe to the Clinton bagman Ng.” This seems likely as an ABC News story from last year reported on Ng’s multiple visits with the Clintons in 1997 when he was photographed having meetings with them. So Ashe is looking at prison time for dealing with a corrupt billionaire who has a history with Hillary Clinton. He could likely negotiate a leaner sentence if he had some information to impart, but he wouldn’t be able to impart it if his windpipe were crushed by a barbell (who the hell gets killed by their own barbell?).', '>>{Halfrich} : >The incredibly sexy Paula Grober was Bill’s interpreter for the deaf back then and she worked with him for about fifteen years. It’s been reported she had told a friend about Bill’s advances and she promptly died in a car accident wherein she was hurled 33 feet through the air. Nobody saw the accident and it happened when she was alone, driving in the dark, with no other cars around.', '>>{Halfrich} : >When Whitewater exploded, it became very bad for everyone involved, and that list included Vince Foster and the Clintons. Bill Clinton was being accused of forcing a loan to a woman named Susan McDougal, who facilitated a crummy real estate deal they were involved in. Luckily, Vince shot himself in the mouth before he could drag her down. Though many scoff at the idea he was killed, it is a fact that the Clintons immediately raided his office for incriminating documents.', '>>{Halfrich} : >They may be corrupt criminals who nabbed incriminating evidence from a guy who just committed suicide, but they had nothing to do with killing the guy who could have made that evidence public. Jon Parnell Walker was an investigator on the case who might have told us more, but he jumped from his apartment balcony to his death.', '>>{Halfrich} : >In 1997, while Clinton and his erection were still running the White House, an attractive pregnant woman named Suzanne Coleman committed suicide. This isn’t unusual in and of itself, but people started asking questions when it was discovered she apparently shot herself in the back of the head and had an affair with Bill Clinton when he was attorney general in Arkansas. Was she pregnant with his child?', '>>{Halfrich} : >It seems too evil to be true, but as self-professed hitman for the Clintons Larry Nichols said, “The Clintons are bad people and I did bad things for them.”', ">>{Cabinet_Space} : I'd click this article, but I lost my tin foil hat a week ago.", '>>{Halfrich} : >How about Paul Tully? He worked obsessively on Bill’s campaign for president in 1992 and was intimately involved with what went on behind the scenes. He was found dead in his hotel room a few months after Paula Grober was killed.', '>>{Halfrich} : >You know where Donald Trump’s chef is right now? In his kitchen, making a sandwich. The Clintons’ chef is dead. He vanished after going on a hike in June of last year and was eventually found drowned at the bottom of a river.', ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : This isn't even original tin foil! This has been posted across three different conspiritard sites in the last hour.", '>>{because_im_boring} : I heard it was because he threatened to go public about Hilarys onion allergy', '>>{Halfrich} : >On Aug. 1 of this year, author Victor Thorn was found with a gunshot to the back of his head on a hiking trip. It was deemed suicide. He had just released the book Why Hillary Shouldn’t Be in the White House. This brings us up to Aug. 4 of this year, three days after Thorn got shot on a mountaintop. Shawn Lucas was found dead on his bathroom floor just like Paul Tully. Lucas was a process server who proudly served Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the DNC with subpoenas accusing them of putting Hillary over Bernie in the primaries instead of remaining neutral.', '>>{TheTrollingPakistani} : Honestly if Clinton could kill few hundred people and get away with it then she *deserves* to be president. Anyone that smart I would vote for.', '>>{Halfrich} : Is this the typical liberal mindset, or the typical Pakistani mindset to elect people who kill a lot of people and get away with it president?', '>>{HermitPrime} : This is politics, not conspiracies. Keep your retardation in The_Donald.', ">>{TheTrollingPakistani} : Neither. If someone could kill thousands of people and get away scott-free that's a person I want to lead my nation, because whoever that individual is he/she must be one of the smartest sons of bitches on earth. And like 99.9999% of Pakistanis I'm a conservative lmao.", '>>{Halfrich} : Dozens of people mysteriously dying around a presidential candidate is politics. >You know where Donald Trump’s chef is right now? In his kitchen, making a sandwich. The Clintons’ chef is dead. He vanished after going on a hike in June of last year and was eventually found drowned at the bottom of a river.', ">>{Halfrich} : >If someone could kill thousands of people and get away scott-free that's a person I want to lead my nation lol. That at least explains why Pakistan is such a shit hole. Burnt a couple of Christians lately? Or threw acid on a woman or two?", '>>{twistedcheshire} : Leave it to some idiot to believe a hack job opinion piece.', '>>{Halfrich} : > You know where Donald Trump’s chef is right now? In his kitchen, making a sandwich. The Clintons’ chef is dead. He vanished after going on a hike in June of last year and was eventually found drowned at the bottom of a river.', '>>{TheTrollingPakistani} : Nah. Just stoned a rapist to death, after I threw a homosexual off a cliff, before I beheaded a atheist!', '>>{Halfrich} : >You know where Donald Trump’s chef is right now? In his kitchen, making a sandwich. The Clintons’ chef is dead. He vanished after going on a hike in June of last year and was eventually found drowned at the bottom of a river.', ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : I'm sure the sandwich Trump's chef is making is a rather soggy one, too.", '>>{Halfrich} : lol. Stoned a rapist to death? Who did he rape? A goat or a boy?', ">>{HermitPrime} : You keep citing this example like it's some big shocking thing. Like people don't die on hikes unless CIA hitmen are sent after them or something.", '>>{Halfrich} : Still the guy is alive. God Emperor is merciful.', '>>{Halfrich} : > They may be corrupt criminals who nabbed incriminating evidence from a guy who just committed suicide, but they had nothing to do with killing the guy who could have made that evidence public. Jon Parnell Walker was an investigator on the case who might have told us more, but he jumped from his apartment balcony to his death.', '>>{Halfrich} : Did she need four witnesses to prove she was raped?', '>>{Halfrich} : >They may be corrupt criminals who nabbed incriminating evidence from a guy who just committed suicide, but they had nothing to do with killing the guy who could have made that evidence public. Jon Parnell Walker was an investigator on the case who might have told us more, but he jumped from his apartment balcony to his death.', ">>{TheTrollingPakistani} : Isn't that how a justice system works? Ya need proof homie.", ">>{StewPedidiot} : That's why you use a spotter when weight lifting. It's not unheard of to crush your windpipe with a barbell. Why is that so hard to believe?", '>>{Qunidaye} : I heard he cooked her human chop medium instead of medium rare', ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : I'm assuming that he hasn't had him killed because he's from El Salvador and very cheap since he doesn't have to insure him.", '>>{Halfrich} : God Emperor is very cost effective too, unlike Crooked Stool.', '>>{Cabinet_Space} : Thank you! Now I can #MAGA while reading about how the moon landings were fake and Jewish bankers are plotting to take over the world.', '>>{TheTrollingPakistani} : LOL. Pakistan and India have some of the best cricket teams on earth...', ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : I wouldn't call it cost effective when he uses the savings on atomized Cheeto dust for that glow of liver failure.", '>>{StewPedidiot} : Better take the sticker off, you don\'t want anyone thinking your "urban".', ">>{TheTrollingPakistani} : I presume you're a /r/the_donald poster? And I don't understand ya'll 1 second we are bad guys since we hang rapists next second we are rapists? lol", ">>{ellouelle} : > Clintons’ chef He was Dubya's chef, too, why isn't he getting the blame?", ">>{Halfrich} : Those two aren't mutually exclusive, especially when you have men who witness women getting raped even when they are in groups of four and do nothing.", ">>{Halfrich} : Probably because there aren't dozens of people who died mysteriously around Dubya?", ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : I dunno. You can get a good buttplug on Ali Express for cheap. I know Cheeto Benito and his followers aren't a fan of the site because of the foreign name, but you can get almost anything there. Except dignity. But neither he nor they seem to need that.", '>>{ellouelle} : Yeah, the guy whose family is telling you to stop forcing them to relive the pain of losing him by dragging his death into your conspiracy nonsense?', ">>{Halfrich} : Oh, Clintons are never cheap. That cigar Billy Boy stuck up Monica's pussy was pretty expensive.", ">>{Halfrich} : What's his family's explanation for the fact that he got shot on the back of his head, and the fact that nothing was taken, and the fact that all this happened in a pretty safe area?", ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : That was 20 years ago, and cigars are commodity items. And you seem to have mistaken the locations used. While the vagina is close to the anus, they are not the same thing. You'll learn that when you reach Biology.", ">>{jonnyp11} : He was shot twice in his back, and was alive until after he was in the hospital. They panicked and shot him after a scuffle. Guns are loud. They didn't want to wait and try their luck with the cops, who said they got there in under 2 minutes. That single street corner has experience a string of mugging s in the past few months. I don't remember if they gave any numbers, but this was the first shooting, and the cops said that area had been having issues lately.", ">>{TheTrollingPakistani} : That never ever happens. He'll my uncle's saw a rapist being crucified in Pakistan one time.", ">>{jonnyp11} : Or you just can't get that last rep, and end up trapped. I did that, and I didn't even have the clips to keep the weights on, but I was in the corner and couldn't move it to get them off. Luckily there were several other people in there, otherwise I probably wouldn't have tried.", '>>{i_saw_a_moose} : You seem to know a lot about Butt Plugs, Simple Jay! Looks like we finally found your area of expertise!', ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : Sure do. Sex toys are a burgeoning industry and the usage of them in healthy consensual relationships is at an all time high. Oh, wait, we're you trying to shame me by implying that I personally use them? My my, that's quite homophobic of you to assume that a man would be ashamed to admit to ass play. *tsk tsk*", ">>{i_saw_a_moose} : Hahaha you are just the gift that keeps on giving (taking) Simple Jay! What you do in your free time is none of my business, but just so you know, lots of people find the idea of sticking things up their asses to be extremely repulsive. Doesn't make them homophobic. It's just a matter of taste.", ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : Those folks live a repressed life if they've never explored their kinks, and I feel sad for them. No life is really lived unless it is lived to it's full measure."], ['>>{berniesandersssss} : Tim Kaine attacks Donald Trump over video but struggles to discuss leaked emails of Clinton campaign', ">>{vgsui} : %25 upvoted in less than a minute. Guess who's back!!!", '>>{theombudsmen} : Discuss what about them? The only reason people are thinking they have anything salacious is because people keep implying that by putting "leaked" in front of it. Political click-bait (not the story, the tactic). *edit parenthetical', ">>{berniesandersssss} : r/politics was good while it was democratic. Now it's just another [Goebbels](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Goebbels) propaganda machine.", ">>{di11deux} : You've been ranting and raving on this sub for awhile now. Comparing a sub to Nazi propaganda? Come on. Perhaps, it's just a reality that more people support Clinton than Trump or anyone else. It doesn't need to be a conspiracy.", '>>{-Teekey-} : This is rich, coming from a guy whose been spamming the same attack articles all morning.', ">>{vgsui} : As sad as his description is, I think it's rather true at this point: https://www.reddit.com/r/undelete/comments/56qgv5/176666968_well_donald_trump_just_threatened_to/", ">>{berniesandersssss} : > negative attack articles ? This is an article from the LA Times about Hillary's leaked emails, something that should concern us all as it shows how rigged the primary was and how compromised our media is. This isn't an attack, it's information that should be read and allow us all to make a more informed decision on 11/8.", '>>{berniesandersssss} : Back in the primary all of reddit wanted to see Hillary in prison. Now enthusiasm has been lost because Bernie was cheated. There are no conspiracies when it comes to Hillary, only a matter of time before everything about her sordid corrupt anti-democratic life is known.', ">>{-Teekey-} : You're criticizing the sub as being a propaganda machine, then you're spamming your own agenda ad nauseum. Should it be discussed? Of course. It has. There's been plenty of threads about the leaks. You spamming the same topic with as many articles as you can find is something else entirely.", ">>{vgsui} : I can't or else I'll be banned. There name rhymes with leaky bar and sneaky car"], ['>>{Export_portal} : Lenovo Yoga Book copies handwriting off paper notepads - BBC News', '>>{Grippler} : interesting, I like the idea of being able to write/draw on my computer without having to bring along a separate digitizer, and not covering up the screens visible area.', ">>{OmniaII} : I had one of these in the 90s Forgot the company. It used yellow legal paper as I remember Seiko? Franklin? Probably still have it in my attic. I'm sure the tech is better now. Especially since you can double it as a drawing tablet as well. Mine was pretty good, but I never really got into the note taking -> computer. I found it was better to just use pen and ink.", '>>{redoverture} : Wacom Bamboo tablets do this with existing tech. Seems like a cheaper alternative than this, but I wonder if anyone has compared the accuracy or usability.', ">>{icky_boo} : Man I would buy this thing instantly if it didn't have a ATOM processor.", '>>{sarrock16} : Anyone remember the Fly pentop computer by leapfrog, pretty much the same ocncept 10 years ago ! https://www.amazon.com/LeapFrog-Enterprises-37700-Pentop-Computer/dp/B00099EBHK', '>>{Menachem34} : Great news for the new academic year! I still like to take notes with pen in hand writing.', ">>{sqrlmasta} : Was it [this Cross Pen CrossPad](https://www.amazon.com/Cross-CrossPad-CP41001-01-Portable-Digital/dp/B00000K1R3)? This is what I had and although I don't have the pad anymore, I do still have the pen that came with it.", ">>{OmniaII} : Yes! That's it. It may or may not be in my attic. for $200 I'll search this weekend and ebay that sucker ;)", ">>{OmniaII} : Yes, but that came out about the same time as the PDAs so they didn't catch on. Plus they were/are huge! ^^\\(insert ^^some ^^derogatory ^^mom ^^joke ^^here)", ">>{AkirIkasu} : I'm surprised to see this kind of thing come to market. It's not new technology, but it is innovative. That being said, I think that most people realize that having their notes digitized this way doesn't offer many real-world benefits over using a scanner or a good camera. The only real benefit I see is that artists can draw and it will give actual paper-and-pen tactile response. I'm worried about finding ink refills for it, though.", ">>{DirtyAxe} : It's pretty neat , but having to carry your laptop with you just to take notes , internal storage for the pen could be nice , so the pen will upload whenever you are close enough", '>>{pentamethylCP} : From what I can tell Wacom requires you to have a subscription to their cloud system if you want to actually be able to export your files as vectors.', '>>{redoverture} : I actually owned the folio for tablet for awhile, never saw the option for vector. If I did I probably would have considered keeping it, must have been from the subscription.', '>>{pentamethylCP} : Since you have some experience with the software, can you answer a couple of questions? 1) Is the PDF export a vector image (that is, can you zoom in on it without it becoming blurry like a raster image) 2) Can you export several pages to PDF at once you are you stuck clicking export, save, etc for each page?', ">>{ggamer92} : Confused by your comment. What's wrong with the ATOM chip?", ">>{ayyuslmaous} : It's extremely underpowered. One could get much more for the money", '>>{isthisfunforyou719} : Amen. Having worked with Lenovo tablets in both the consumer space and the enterprise level, they are willing to ship hardware barely able to handle day-to-day programs. This machine will struggle with Windows 10 with any decent programs running. Maybe the Android version will be okay. Form factor does look way cool, though I wish they included a slot of the digital pen.', '>>{otterotherotter} : As a writer who clams up in front of a blank word document, this would be completely amazing IF it could convert handwriting to text. As it is, I already own a scanner, thanks.', ">>{AirieFenix} : You should pay to get your manuscript text converted to digital text. I don't know if you can convert your drawings to vector.", ">>{zero_dgz} : I was really, really stoked for this thing until I learned that the pressure sensitive active stylus doesn't work directly on the screen as well -- only on the keyboard/notepad area. I pretty extensively use the pressure sensitive stylus function on my Thinkpad S1. I would have used the Yoga Book as a much more portable replacement if it had that functionality -- thickness be damned. I think they dropped the ball on that, personally.", ">>{zero_dgz} : Not in that form factor you can't. Not being x86 compatible, anyway. Intel has some i5 and i7 models that'll fit in a tablet, but have fun with the heat dissipation and a 30 minute battery life. The minimum thickness for a device using one of those seems to be about what the Surface Pro has achieved. Folded, this entire thing is thinner than just the tablet portion of a Surface Pro.", ">>{zero_dgz} : If previous Lenovo offerings are any indication you'll be able to buy an OEM quality 100 pack of replacement pen cartridges for around $2 on Alibaba about five seconds after this thing hits the market.", ">>{AkirIkasu} : Ha! You're probably right about that. Though the quality will probably not be that great (as if the OEM will be that great to begin with) The issue is long-term support though. Those Chinese companies will not want to make them forever.", ">>{zero_dgz} : Spend $10 on a stockpile of spares and you'll have ink for your stylus long after the battery in the Yoga Book no longer holds a charge. I still have a pill bottle full of about 97 little red replacement Wacom stylus tips from my old x201. I purchased One Quantity of the damn things... Some day I'll find a use for the rest of them. (That was three computers ago.)", ">>{ayyuslmaous} : Wow, ridiculous. I didn't realize the actual thickness (or lack thereof) of the laptop, so I automatically assumed a better CPU could be practically fitted in", '>>{ChiefParzival} : IIRC it uses onenote so it can transcode wiring to text']]

classify and reply

[">>{1000FC} : Hopefully it's gps is much more accurate than the gear s2", '>>{Ericoster} : 88 US Generals Stand Together Against Hillary Clinton In One Massive Act Of Defiance', ">>{KatiePuss} : She's already got Colorado, Virginia, PA and New Hampshire more or less locked down. all she needs to do is keep all the traditional blue states and she wins.", ">>{Crazy_Mastermind} : Jokes on you Crooked $hillary! Trump is in CT! He's playing 48D Jenga", '>>{sedgwickian} : 20% of the number of generals who backed Romney btw', ">>{DetailsDetails} : I hope it can accurately read my orange's HR.", '>>{FlyingSquid} : A report from EndingTheFed.com "via USA Newsflash." Sounds legit.', ">>{edhere} : Failed presidential candidate Donald Trump is failing. Believe me. A lot of people are saying he won't win a single state. I've heard plenty of people saying that. Sad.", '>>{gooderthanhail} : wtf is "rebuild our military?" Is our military shit defunct now or something? If you solely listen to Republicans, you would think that our soldiers are armed with bows and arrows.', ">>{semose} : ctrl+f battery: 3-4 days, 5 on standby Hmm... maybe. I'll wait for reviews, though. Ideally, I want a week, but I don't need the GPS, so might come close with that disabled...", ">>{njmaverick} : Are we talking about these that back Hillary or the ones that used to run the nuclear silos and are scared shitless at the thought of a President Trump Hillary's military endorsements Air Force[335] Michael Donley, 22nd Secretary (2008–13) (Republican)[16] John W. Douglass, ret. 1-star General Irv Halter, ret. 2-star General Marcelite J. Harris, ret. 2-star General Lloyd W. Newton,* ret. 4-star General[534] Daniel P. Woodward, ret. 1-star General Margaret H. Woodward, ret. 2-star General Army[335][535] Clara Adams-Enders, ret. 1-star General Edward D. Baca, ret. 3-star General Joe N. Ballard, ret. 3-star General, Chief of Engineers (1996–2000) Daniel W. Christman, ret. 3-star General, West Point Superintendent (1996–2001) Wesley Clark, ret. 4-star General[21] Paul Eaton, ret. 2-star General Mari K. Eder, ret. 2-star General Robert G. Gard Jr., ret. 3-star General Florent Groberg, ret. Captain (Republican)[536] Claudia J. Kennedy, ret. 3-star General[332] Keith Kerr, ret. 1-star General David M. Maddox,* ret. 4-star General Peter Mansoor, ret. Colonel (Republican)[24] Robert L. Nabors, ret. 2-star General Dana J.H. Pittard, ret. 2-star General Gale Pollock,* ret. 2-star General (Republican)[16] Robert W. Sennewald,* ret. 4-star General Loree K. Sutton, ret. 1-star General Antonio Taguba, ret. 2-star General[20] Abraham J. Turner, ret. 2-star General Robin Umberg, ret. 1-star General Johnnie E. Wilson, ret. 4-star General Jill Wine-Banks, General Counsel (1977–80)[537] Coast Guard Sally Brice-O'Hara, ret. 3-star Admiral, 27th Vice-Commandant (2010–12)[335] Marine Corps[335] John R. Allen, ret. 4-star General Juan G. Ayala, ret. 2-star General David M. Brahms, ret. 1-star General Stephen A. Cheney, ret. 1-star General Walter E. Gaskin, ret. 3-star General[538] Arnold L. Punaro, ret. 2-star General Navy[335] Donald Arthur, ret. 3-star Admiral, 35th Surgeon General (2004–07) Bruce E. Grooms, ret. 3-star Admiral Gail Harris, ret. Captain[114] John Hutson, ret. 2-star Admiral[539] Mark Kelly, ret. Captain and NASA astronaut[133] Jay A. DeLoach, ret. 1-star Admiral Deborah Loewer, ret. 1-star Admiral", '>>{tacolikesweed} : Does it go faster and emit steam in this...Gear 2nd?', ">>{007meow} : I'd drop my fitbit for the Gear Fit 2 in a heartbeat, but no iOS support = no go for me, unfortunately.", ">>{CornCobbDouglas} : Damn, there she goes trying to win Georgia, Nebraska, Utah and Arizona, and trump flanked her by taking CT. He's outflanking her flank.", '>>{j_lyf} : How big is the loss being made on these products?', '>>{Phredex} : Amazing that anyone has any faith at all in the Polls, or what the Media is telling us. Proven to be wrong a thousand times over, yet people hang their beliefs about what is happening in the world around them. Despite the evidence that is visible in your daily lives. I simply do not understand how people can be so intentionally blind to the reality. I truly fear for the future of the country, and the world. It has never been a nice place, and appears to be getting worse daily.', '>>{studiosucof} : The Gear Fit 2 has one drawback that those other aforementioned bands don’t have: it only works with Android smartphones (4.4 or higher), whereas Fitbits, Microsoft Band, and even Garmin devices work with a variety of mobile platforms as well as desktop software. ONE drawback? More like major. Also, I am not too fond of the look.', ">>{batmanshome} : Why is it that every smartwatch has a drawback. This one won't work with other platforms and you need to press a physical button to wake it. I'm just gonna keep waiting until the technology advances sooner. Shout out to all the early adopters though, thanks for pushing the industry forward.", '>>{OnePrarieOutpost} : So 88 retired guys support Trump. And nothing changed.', '>>{IphtashuFitz} : And as of September 7th, [95 retired generals and admirals were endorsing Clinton](https://www.hillaryclinton.com/briefing/updates/2016/09/07/ninety-five-retired-generals-and-admirals-endorse-hillary-clinton/).', ">>{s629c} : The gear s2 doesn't have a built in GPS...", '>>{mikeash} : They have an audacious plan to expand the US Navy to 350 ships. ...Up from its current total of 430.', '>>{protoknuckles} : So the bar is set pretty low. -edit- Thanks for the gold, stranger!', '>>{tau-lepton} : Polls have been shown to be pretty damn accurate. Being behind by 7 pecent in August makes winning on November 8 virtually impossible.', ">>{ratherlargepie} : She's up 12 points in Colorado. It's all about the green", '>>{lordfredericknorth} : > Proven to be wrong a thousand times over Provide 1000 sources, please.', ">>{TitaniuIVI} : I'd get it if it has the ability to sync with a HR chest strap. Unless they reinvented wrist HR, it's probably not accurate with lots of motion. The app it syncs with would have to be good too. Currently using a vivofit2 with the Garmin Connect app and it works pretty good, but looking to upgrade.", '>>{Ericoster} : An appeal to authority would be voting for the Clinton/Media machine that has been pulling the string for the last 15 years.', '>>{L1B3L} : Microsoft Band 2 is pretty close to the Fit 2, more sensors but not water resistant.', '>>{LynxRufus} : Genetic fallacy mixed with a conspiracy theory. Nice.', ">>{Boxy310} : Next you'll tell me he has a little list of 14 candidates for the Supreme Court justices.", '>>{MidgetLovingMaxx} : Typically the Republican nominee has hundreds endorsing him. 88 is more telling of Trumps failure than an actual endorsement.', ">>{idreamofdinos} : Huh, my original Gear Fit has a toggle to use the button or to wake it by looking at it (a gyro thing, science stuff). I know the video specifically stated the physical button, but I don't know why they wouldn't have it standard on the second one as well.", '>>{Boxy310} : Yes, but what is the plan to rebuild our Cavalry corps and reclaim the glory of pikemen?', ">>{Egorse} : >This sort of endorsement will surely give the Republican candidate a huge boost for the upcoming election and the two remaining debates. This letter was written about a month ago and it really hasn't changed anything poll wise.", '>>{Norotom5} : Exactly, our Navy is "shrinking" because Navy\'s are becoming obsolete. Ships are big, slow, hard to hide, and "easy" to sink. And, if one does start to sink, then there goes all our fancy shit, and our seamen start to drown. The best thing about the Modern Navy, is its ability to perform humanitarian relief. I got so pissed of when Pence, in the VP debate, brought up the Navy (it was more of a quip), and how it was weaker than our 1945 fleet.', ">>{DBHT14} : To be clear though when compared with current taskings and on station requirements the Navy is under fuck tons of strain. Shit like extending carrier deployments beyond a year when 6 months used to be the standard(and now the CNO says he just wants the goal to get back to 8), absolutely degrades men, ships, and morale of the force. There simply aren't enough hulls for all the places a hull is wanted, especially for platforms that require extensive lead up time between deployments, like a carrier(the rule of thumb being that it takes 3 carriers to keep 1 always on station). While the LCS program to allow smaller ships to take the place of DDG's where they are overkill has finally been acknowledged as a man power fuckup, which was a far greater problem to the program than any design error could have been. Once again trying to get away with under manning and stretching sailors thin, and then wondering why stuff keeps breaking. While the restart of the Arleigh Burke production line is welcome, if only a stopgap measure, and the 1 for 1 replacement of Nimitz for Ford hulls doesn't really solve the problem just punts it while you have temporary number inflation during the transfer every few years. To be clear there is no objective level that the USN needs to be at. But when you combine the missions it is tasked with, with the size and tools it has on hand, it is only at a borderline sustainable place, and one that does not aid in morale and retention, let alone safety or warfighting prowess.", ">>{007meow} : I really considered it for a while, but it's apparently bulky/not very ergonomic, battery life is meh, and pricey. Guess I'll wait for the Apple Watch 2.", ">>{mikeash} : You may very well be right. Unfortunately, the numbers I quoted are verbatim: the Navy really does have about 430 ships, and Trump really does want to increase it to 350. So while the idea that the Navy should be larger may have good reasons behind it, that particular proposal appears to be entirely unrelated to reality. In any case, thank you for elaborating on the current state of things, it's definitely interesting to know about.", ">>{ratherlargepie} : the evidence that is visible in your daily lives. This is a good point. Your reality is the reality you choose to see. If you are choosing to see Trump's idiotic, discriminatory rhetoric as sarcastic, you will see a sarcastic man who never tells the truth. That can't be good. If you are seeing the rhetoric as idiotic and discriminatory, that also can't be good. What reality do you think you're looking at? Spend all day on /pol/?", ">>{KatiePuss} : Not really, it's more about the Hispanics and College Educated-Whites.", '>>{DBHT14} : The biggest problem is really the carriers. Halfway through their life they have to go through what is called the "Refueling and Complex Overhaul" which takes each ship out of the line for about 18 months. Over runs with that, and the slow delivery of the Gerald Ford meant that when the Ike\'s overhaul went long the Teddy Roosevelt was going to leave the Gulf last Fall without an immediate replacement. In the end they forced the TR to stay on station longer and rushed the deployment of the Truman which had been thrown off by the Ike taking longer to get back into service. Making nobody happy and straining the system. The Navy has been trying to adapt, for instance the Ticonderoga class cruisers are a key but aging part of the fleet. To extend their life basically half are now being put into reserve and mothballs, while the other half gets brief refits and used up then they bring the others out of reserve to maintain the same but smaller number of ready hulls.', ">>{Sinhumane} : Thank God. I have been eyeing the gear fit for a while, and held back because it is a bit dated. Lower price, crammed with extras, I'm sold.", ">>{Lynchmobb} : Basically since the recession the military has seen extensive equipment and personnel cuts. However, the demands placed on the military to fulfill the United States' foreign obligations have continued to grow. Military really is stretched thin, and perhaps this is hyperbole, but it reminds me of the later stages of the Roman Empire. For a lot of issues it seems, Trump addresses a real problem, but fails at articulating the solution.", ">>{mikeash} : Your last sentence hits the nail on the head, I think. It's not much to his credit, though. It's pretty easy to spot problems, most of the time. Coming up with solutions is the hard part.", ">>{ratherlargepie} : Can't a guy make a weed joke around here?", ">>{kah0922} : Go back to longroom... except you can't because the site is dead.", '>>{StringyLow} : And Christmas shopping for my girlfriend is done. . She _loves_ her Gear Fit. Absolutely loves it. The GPS feature is going to make bicycle trips even more fun for her.', '>>{CarmineFields} : People said the same thing about Romney. When will you learn?', ">>{KatiePuss} : Everyone thinks I'm just an excellent person to be around.", ">>{DsyelxicBob} : I wouldn't be so sure about that. The gear S and S2 can be woken by angling the screen to your face and the S2 was announced to support iOS later this year (the Fit 2 may follow suit) The Fit 2 still support all droids on KitKat and above so the support pool isn't exactly small even if it doesn't yet support iOS", ">>{atxbuttstuff} : It's only a major drawback if you use more than one platform. Most people are casual users, they don't care to sync to more than the main device that they own.", '>>{Hjeltepojk} : You\'re aware those "white noise machines" were just wifi routers right? I mean even the_donald admitted it.', ">>{WhitePriviledge} : Why does the info at the bottom angle AWAY from you? It looks like it's setup for someone to wear it on their right wrist.", ">>{KatiePuss} : Yes I'm fine and dandy... I'm about to go masturbate while I stare at my self in the mirror and tell myself how hot I am.", '>>{bitfriend} : only because the "libertarian" (aka, GOP) votes are suspiciously left out the self-delusion is what fucks over all attempts to stop Trump, the more the media tries to make their narrative into the data the stronger Trump gets. Less than 10% of Americans actually *trust* the media in the first place, refusing to take Trump seriously will cause for a major upset in November', ">>{brunes} : All I want is a watch with an analog face that lasts 2 years on a battery, with an LCD smart watch on the back, Why doesn't anyone make this? I tried Android Wear, it's a failure IMO.", ">>{EBOV1} : 4 GB Storage doesn't sound like a selling point. MicroUSB? No USB-C? No wireless charging? Watching people try to plug microUSB into these tiny devices is so painful.", '>>{SUM_TIN_W0NG} : I wish they would work on the battery life before adding more stuff.', ">>{ShroudedSciuridae} : I don't know if it's still ongoing, but I picked up my Band 2 last week when they dropped the price $75. I love it, but the battery life does require you charge it daily. Since it's not waterproof though, I just do it when I shower.", '>>{barrist} : It\'s almost at the three week mark since the conventions which is when the polls usually get past the "convention bounce" noise.. so yeah, not looking good for Trump if it\'s still at a 6-7 national lead right now.', ">>{SanDiegoDude} : I saw a couple Trump Pence bumper stickers yesterday, it's proof Trump is totally winning!", '>>{LetsJerkCircular} : I wish they\'d just call it by the year. It\'s already a higher number than any of their devices and it\'s doable if they call it the "Samsung," "Model," (Galaxy S, Note, Tab, Gear, VR, etc.) and Year. Samsung Galaxy Gear Fit 16.', '>>{SanDiegoDude} : Make sure you wear your special [aluminum signal blocking brain defender equipment](http://i.imgur.com/KbAZUeS.jpg) when you see [these mind control devices](http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/antenna/installation/guide/ant2513p4mn.pdf) around in public.', '>>{Phredex} : Interesting how someone who goes against the Hive Mind of the Party Sycophants is always "Crazy" "Racist" "Homophobe" or similar, yet people who absolutely close their minds to anything but the "Party Line" is enlightened. [Democrats](http://i.imgur.com/5UaHYiq.jpg)', '>>{chris480} : It appears to come in a dark magenta though.', '>>{Phredex} : Not "White Noise Machines". Actual falsification by programming. http://clashdaily.com/2016/08/watch-man-proves-software-stole-votes-hillary-won-counties-viral/?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=exchange&utm_campaign=politicalinsider&utm_term=imposts However, it is entirely your choice if you would like to accept this kind of manipulation of your rights. The world you are creating is a scary one indeed. Perhaps a re-reading of 1984 is in order? How will you feel when someone other than who you agree with is in power and creating "Executive Orders" criminalizing (whatever you hold dear)?', ">>{StayGold1850} : Incredible that in like four years Colorado and Virginia went from battleground purple states to solid blue. And that now Brewer and McCain's Arizona and Romney and Huntsman's Utah are the battleground states. Unless Clinton actually turns out to be a murderer, I don't see how she loses to Trump now.", ">>{Phredex} : We did. The bullshit worked against Romney. It won't against Trump. Good luck.", '>>{CarmineFields} : It already is. Clinton is leading by miles and you guys are lying to yourselves about it.', '>>{N-ST} : I heard they discontinued the production of the G3. The promises of its success were a bit inflated.', ">>{VolofTN} : I don't feel 4 GB is a problem. I can fit a lot of music in 4 GB. It may not be the highest quality, but with Bluetooth playback, it's not going to make a difference.", '>>{relevantsun} : The gps probably only turns on during exercises such as running', '>>{Hjeltepojk} : Oh i just klicked your link and read the first row and when it included such blatant misinformation i lost any trust in the source. Want people to take you seriously? Start by not linking to sites that will lie for partisan purposes in their first sentence. Makes your hyperbole fall flat rather quickly.', ">>{Phredex} : OK, don't like the information, refuse to believe the source. If you have any evidence that any of this is incorrect, bring it forward. I would recommend allowing yourself to actually read some evidence of your being manipulated, instead of allowing the manipulation to hold so much sway over you that you refuse to even consider that you may have been lied to all along.", '>>{Phredex} : Yep, you are right. The term "Unskewing" means to use actual facts to correct a "Skewed" view of something, like the idea that Hillary is winning. To skew something means to twist the truth of the thing. http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/skewed It is unfortunate that your Shillbots continue to insist on using skewed data to support their stance. Could it be that when the accurate information is given out, that their arguments simply fall flat? Child, please do some research into what is really happening here, and compare it to history. I hope that you become wise enough, soon, to draw your own conclusions about the manipulation that has been taking place for the last 30 years. You will not like the place that the United States of America is in danger of becoming.', ">>{Hjeltepojk} : I do refuse to believe the source because it has already proven to me that it doesn't have a very good relationship with the truth. Some journalist doesn't have service on her cellphone and assumes with absolutely zero evidence that her cellphone must have been jammed. That is the sort of loony conspiracy nonsense that i honestly feel dumber for having given a minute of my time. If you want to live with a persecution complex, go ahead. I'll just stay out here in reality.", '>>{CaughtInRye} : Ya but it also gives you insatiable hunger for meat.', '>>{CarmineFields} : >Yep, you are right. The term "Unskewing" means to use actual facts to correct a "Skewed" view of something, like the idea that Hillary is winning. And they believed they were using actual facts last time too. But they aren\'t. They\'re using feels, which is what republicans use instead of facts. That\'s why they don\'t believe in science either. Because they feel it\'s wrong. >Child, please do some research into what is really happening here, and compare it to history. I have and I\'m comparing it to 2012 when this exact same thing occurred. >You will not like the place that the United States of America is in danger of becoming. I know I\'ll hate Trump\'s America.', ">>{Str8Thugin} : [Can't wait to see what awesome commercials they come up for this one](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8jsDWV8YpQ)", '>>{37214} : Bought a gear fit last night for $45. eBay, here I come!', '>>{Phredex} : Well, I suppose we will find out in a bit more than eighty days.', ">>{OptionalCookie} : Many say the same about the Apple watch,and I agree with Samsung on this. If you buy an apple watch and have no apple phone you are out of luck. Why? Well if you have Android, you can get an open source app, but if you have Samsung then it's cool. 😎 so Samsung can just keep selling to Android users. And that's OK.", '>>{DanWallace} : Honestly I have zero use for the xiaomi bands until they open it up to third party apps. I just want to able to use it as my sleep as android tracker.', ">>{AnchorDTOM} : Election is months away. This is sloppy reporting. As much as the media would like to call the election today they can't so they have to just keep telling the people he cannot win and is losing when his rallies get bigger and bigger", '>>{tacolikesweed} : I heard, initially, it shrunk upon use of G3', '>>{alexefi} : the only reason why i switched from gear fir to fitbit HR is because gear fit needs to be activated to read heartbeat, it doesnt do that constantly like fitbit, and shows when i was doing something and when i was just laying on bed and wave my hand.. hope this one will do constant heart rate monitor and keep record..', '>>{kah0922} : Proof doesn\'t mean shit when "possible" is plastered all over your article.', '>>{Xainkungjee} : Thats really good...Gear fit is the face of mordern era.Samsung worked great in Gear Fit 1.Its time to rock the party again.I want to be the first to get it...😘', '>>{ratherlargepie} : Oh man, I just saw a Bernie sticker! Still in it!!!!', '>>{diagoro1} : I have the first model. Major issues with keeping a tracking signal, or the requirement of using 3rd party app to track workouts. But one of the biggest gripes is losing all my settings when the battery drains. Major pita to reset everything numerous times due to limited battery life.', ">>{TomfromLondon} : I love mine BUT it's not that the battery doesn't last each day, it's that I'm about to send my 4th for replacement as the battery died.", ">>{TomfromLondon} : No, he is saying it only works with android, that's the drawback.", '>>{Ryesagain} : I have the original and the only reason I stopped using it was because the band broke and I haven\'t replaced it. I loved how it had apps on google play for lots of different things. The music control was so handy. Using it as a camera remote was great. Reading texts, emails, even as a camera viewer was all right. It even had apps that let you reply to texts/emails but I didn\'t try those out since they were 3rd party and had bad reviews. The screen wasn\'t very accurate for typing text or numbers in a calculator or keyboard but the screen wasn\'t this big. It might be better to do that now. The waterproofing is great, it was rated by ifixit as like a 8 or 9 out of ten to fix yourself. I liked how I could lock the phone if my gear fit lost bluetooth, or lock apps with an app. Though I think that\'s available for any wearables on Android. The original did lag with 3rd party apps but that\'s something that was a dev problem, I think. It was "bring to your face" activated and I\'m not sure if I liked needing to do that to activate it but it was so much more handy then pulling a big phone out all the time for anything. So I don\'t think they would remove it, I think In the video you can clearly see it activating while she moves it. This looks promising. Though I only paid $50 for mine, it really opened my eyes to how handy smart watches and wearables are. If this one is faster and more accurate with 3rd party apps I might consider this over a pebble. Edit some typos. Also loved having a flashlight on my wrist and the amazing wallpaper customization, though it had little 1st party support for watch faces or having date/steps/hr/cal burned added to those watch faces. And the 3rd party apps that let you change those faces wouldn\'t give access to date/steps/hr/calories burned. Also as a construction worker it still didn\'t have any scratches on the screen! The silver trim flaked and faded though. I was not easy on this device and it still looks good. This was my first smart watch and it made me realize how intuitive touch screens are on them. But it also helped me realize how many smart watches never have a fully rounded spec list and it\'s getting so old. I have seen so many that someone should be able to make the full package by now. a waterproof smart watch that syncs to your phone, has 3rd party support, an accurate heart rate monitor and step counter/gps, touch, accurate flick wrist activation, accurate touch screen, full screen customization, 5 to 7 day battery life. It\'s been so long since I thought about it I can\'t remember because I\'ve seen so many that always had 1 or 2 missing important features.', ">>{getddt} : Love my Garmin Fenix 3 HR. Admittedly it's a fitness watch first, smart watch 2nd, but it ticked nearly all the boxes for me.", ">>{pipsqeek} : You know what would be nice, Samsung? If you didn't install the software for it even when I don't fucking own the device.", '>>{absolutebeginners} : I too live in fear easily manipulated sheep like you will give idiots like trump actual power.', '>>{Totallynotatheif} : Maybe a pebble 2 or core would be more suitable?', '>>{Squarkle} : You are aware this is Samsung, right? Adding more stuff is their way to start the morning.', ">>{Millicent_Bystandard} : They've recently started doing this for their newer phones - Samsung Galaxy J7-16 for example.", ">>{QuasisLogic} : I've demoed this product. My only complaint is I've not managed to get it off since I've put it on. And now it feels like I'm always stuck in second gear.", ">>{Young_Lincoln} : Depending on your intended use and if you want a big AMOLED display vs. an always on, smaller display with buttons, a Pebble smartwatch might work for you. They just started a kickstarter with new models focused on HR tracking and fitness which have a week or 10 days for each model. Really depends on what's important to you, but I'm happy with mine.", ">>{chandler25} : I've expected greater things. Maybe some holographic display.", ">>{MalenkoMC} : I'm waiting for the smart watch that will tell me when I need to drink some water because my body is dehydrated or something along those lines. Heart rate is all fine and dandy, but there are other things that would be more useful to me.", '>>{LaneySKillz} : I love nothing more than to see people with a activity tracker/fitness band forget to recharge it And then flip shit when they realize none of their steps got logged Meanwhile here i am . . . Going on two years without having to change the battery.', '>>{SUM_TIN_W0NG} : It was more of a wish for all the companies to put a decent priority on it.', ">>{Mughi} : I guess it hasn't been your day, your week, your month, or even your year, has it?", '>>{one80oneday} : My wife loves the first gen Gear Fit and will probably get Gear Fit 2 for Xmas', '>>{Tachyons_for_days} : Yeah, I like almost everything about the Band except...the band. Having the battery or whatever it is sticking off the bottom of my wrist was just awkward.', '>>{febrig} : If I were to get this device - will I be missing out on alot, as an iPhone-user?', '>>{EBOV1} : Actually the newer 4.1+ bluetooth audio protocol stack this device supports can stream higher bitrates its predecessors. So it would make a difference, if you had the storage.', '>>{WarHammer_15} : They really need to simplify there product names, make them more appealing like Samsung Fit 2 or something', '>>{piyushr21} : So they are just like Apple, but with android inside.', ">>{Bakonati} : It has a dock with metal contacts that you place it on. Funny it isn't on the main product page.", '>>{Bakonati} : I wondered if that was what you meant. I got my Gear Fit 2 yesterday. The cradle is magnetic and the fit just magically slips onto the cradle to charge. Nice design.', '>>{andretan} : Yes. It will sync with S Health app if I am not wrong.', ">>{Uk101abc} : I bought one. The screen is excellent but the crappy Samsung gear app and choices of other apps really let it down. I can't even see a place to edit stride length, enter height etc for that setup. Can't get it to communicate with other apps I use such as myfitnesspal. Feel made a mistake buying it"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{KatiePuss} : She's already got Colorado, Virginia, PA and New Hampshire more or less locked down. all she needs to do is keep all the traditional blue states and she wins.", ">>{Crazy_Mastermind} : Jokes on you Crooked $hillary! Trump is in CT! He's playing 48D Jenga", ">>{edhere} : Failed presidential candidate Donald Trump is failing. Believe me. A lot of people are saying he won't win a single state. I've heard plenty of people saying that. Sad.", ">>{CornCobbDouglas} : Damn, there she goes trying to win Georgia, Nebraska, Utah and Arizona, and trump flanked her by taking CT. He's outflanking her flank.", '>>{Phredex} : Amazing that anyone has any faith at all in the Polls, or what the Media is telling us. Proven to be wrong a thousand times over, yet people hang their beliefs about what is happening in the world around them. Despite the evidence that is visible in your daily lives. I simply do not understand how people can be so intentionally blind to the reality. I truly fear for the future of the country, and the world. It has never been a nice place, and appears to be getting worse daily.', '>>{tau-lepton} : Polls have been shown to be pretty damn accurate. Being behind by 7 pecent in August makes winning on November 8 virtually impossible.', ">>{ratherlargepie} : She's up 12 points in Colorado. It's all about the green", '>>{lordfredericknorth} : > Proven to be wrong a thousand times over Provide 1000 sources, please.', ">>{ratherlargepie} : the evidence that is visible in your daily lives. This is a good point. Your reality is the reality you choose to see. If you are choosing to see Trump's idiotic, discriminatory rhetoric as sarcastic, you will see a sarcastic man who never tells the truth. That can't be good. If you are seeing the rhetoric as idiotic and discriminatory, that also can't be good. What reality do you think you're looking at? Spend all day on /pol/?", ">>{KatiePuss} : Not really, it's more about the Hispanics and College Educated-Whites.", ">>{ratherlargepie} : Can't a guy make a weed joke around here?", ">>{kah0922} : Go back to longroom... except you can't because the site is dead.", '>>{CarmineFields} : People said the same thing about Romney. When will you learn?', ">>{KatiePuss} : Everyone thinks I'm just an excellent person to be around.", '>>{Hjeltepojk} : You\'re aware those "white noise machines" were just wifi routers right? I mean even the_donald admitted it.', ">>{KatiePuss} : Yes I'm fine and dandy... I'm about to go masturbate while I stare at my self in the mirror and tell myself how hot I am.", '>>{bitfriend} : only because the "libertarian" (aka, GOP) votes are suspiciously left out the self-delusion is what fucks over all attempts to stop Trump, the more the media tries to make their narrative into the data the stronger Trump gets. Less than 10% of Americans actually *trust* the media in the first place, refusing to take Trump seriously will cause for a major upset in November', '>>{barrist} : It\'s almost at the three week mark since the conventions which is when the polls usually get past the "convention bounce" noise.. so yeah, not looking good for Trump if it\'s still at a 6-7 national lead right now.', ">>{SanDiegoDude} : I saw a couple Trump Pence bumper stickers yesterday, it's proof Trump is totally winning!", '>>{SanDiegoDude} : Make sure you wear your special [aluminum signal blocking brain defender equipment](http://i.imgur.com/KbAZUeS.jpg) when you see [these mind control devices](http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/antenna/installation/guide/ant2513p4mn.pdf) around in public.', '>>{Phredex} : Interesting how someone who goes against the Hive Mind of the Party Sycophants is always "Crazy" "Racist" "Homophobe" or similar, yet people who absolutely close their minds to anything but the "Party Line" is enlightened. [Democrats](http://i.imgur.com/5UaHYiq.jpg)', '>>{Phredex} : Not "White Noise Machines". Actual falsification by programming. http://clashdaily.com/2016/08/watch-man-proves-software-stole-votes-hillary-won-counties-viral/?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=exchange&utm_campaign=politicalinsider&utm_term=imposts However, it is entirely your choice if you would like to accept this kind of manipulation of your rights. The world you are creating is a scary one indeed. Perhaps a re-reading of 1984 is in order? How will you feel when someone other than who you agree with is in power and creating "Executive Orders" criminalizing (whatever you hold dear)?', ">>{StayGold1850} : Incredible that in like four years Colorado and Virginia went from battleground purple states to solid blue. And that now Brewer and McCain's Arizona and Romney and Huntsman's Utah are the battleground states. Unless Clinton actually turns out to be a murderer, I don't see how she loses to Trump now.", ">>{Phredex} : We did. The bullshit worked against Romney. It won't against Trump. Good luck.", '>>{CarmineFields} : It already is. Clinton is leading by miles and you guys are lying to yourselves about it.', '>>{Hjeltepojk} : Oh i just klicked your link and read the first row and when it included such blatant misinformation i lost any trust in the source. Want people to take you seriously? Start by not linking to sites that will lie for partisan purposes in their first sentence. Makes your hyperbole fall flat rather quickly.', ">>{Phredex} : OK, don't like the information, refuse to believe the source. If you have any evidence that any of this is incorrect, bring it forward. I would recommend allowing yourself to actually read some evidence of your being manipulated, instead of allowing the manipulation to hold so much sway over you that you refuse to even consider that you may have been lied to all along.", '>>{Phredex} : Yep, you are right. The term "Unskewing" means to use actual facts to correct a "Skewed" view of something, like the idea that Hillary is winning. To skew something means to twist the truth of the thing. http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/skewed It is unfortunate that your Shillbots continue to insist on using skewed data to support their stance. Could it be that when the accurate information is given out, that their arguments simply fall flat? Child, please do some research into what is really happening here, and compare it to history. I hope that you become wise enough, soon, to draw your own conclusions about the manipulation that has been taking place for the last 30 years. You will not like the place that the United States of America is in danger of becoming.', ">>{Hjeltepojk} : I do refuse to believe the source because it has already proven to me that it doesn't have a very good relationship with the truth. Some journalist doesn't have service on her cellphone and assumes with absolutely zero evidence that her cellphone must have been jammed. That is the sort of loony conspiracy nonsense that i honestly feel dumber for having given a minute of my time. If you want to live with a persecution complex, go ahead. I'll just stay out here in reality.", '>>{CarmineFields} : >Yep, you are right. The term "Unskewing" means to use actual facts to correct a "Skewed" view of something, like the idea that Hillary is winning. And they believed they were using actual facts last time too. But they aren\'t. They\'re using feels, which is what republicans use instead of facts. That\'s why they don\'t believe in science either. Because they feel it\'s wrong. >Child, please do some research into what is really happening here, and compare it to history. I have and I\'m comparing it to 2012 when this exact same thing occurred. >You will not like the place that the United States of America is in danger of becoming. I know I\'ll hate Trump\'s America.', '>>{Phredex} : Well, I suppose we will find out in a bit more than eighty days.', ">>{AnchorDTOM} : Election is months away. This is sloppy reporting. As much as the media would like to call the election today they can't so they have to just keep telling the people he cannot win and is losing when his rallies get bigger and bigger", '>>{kah0922} : Proof doesn\'t mean shit when "possible" is plastered all over your article.', '>>{ratherlargepie} : Oh man, I just saw a Bernie sticker! Still in it!!!!', '>>{absolutebeginners} : I too live in fear easily manipulated sheep like you will give idiots like trump actual power.'], ['>>{Ericoster} : 88 US Generals Stand Together Against Hillary Clinton In One Massive Act Of Defiance', '>>{sedgwickian} : 20% of the number of generals who backed Romney btw', '>>{FlyingSquid} : A report from EndingTheFed.com "via USA Newsflash." Sounds legit.', '>>{gooderthanhail} : wtf is "rebuild our military?" Is our military shit defunct now or something? If you solely listen to Republicans, you would think that our soldiers are armed with bows and arrows.', ">>{njmaverick} : Are we talking about these that back Hillary or the ones that used to run the nuclear silos and are scared shitless at the thought of a President Trump Hillary's military endorsements Air Force[335] Michael Donley, 22nd Secretary (2008–13) (Republican)[16] John W. Douglass, ret. 1-star General Irv Halter, ret. 2-star General Marcelite J. Harris, ret. 2-star General Lloyd W. Newton,* ret. 4-star General[534] Daniel P. Woodward, ret. 1-star General Margaret H. Woodward, ret. 2-star General Army[335][535] Clara Adams-Enders, ret. 1-star General Edward D. Baca, ret. 3-star General Joe N. Ballard, ret. 3-star General, Chief of Engineers (1996–2000) Daniel W. Christman, ret. 3-star General, West Point Superintendent (1996–2001) Wesley Clark, ret. 4-star General[21] Paul Eaton, ret. 2-star General Mari K. Eder, ret. 2-star General Robert G. Gard Jr., ret. 3-star General Florent Groberg, ret. Captain (Republican)[536] Claudia J. Kennedy, ret. 3-star General[332] Keith Kerr, ret. 1-star General David M. Maddox,* ret. 4-star General Peter Mansoor, ret. Colonel (Republican)[24] Robert L. Nabors, ret. 2-star General Dana J.H. Pittard, ret. 2-star General Gale Pollock,* ret. 2-star General (Republican)[16] Robert W. Sennewald,* ret. 4-star General Loree K. Sutton, ret. 1-star General Antonio Taguba, ret. 2-star General[20] Abraham J. Turner, ret. 2-star General Robin Umberg, ret. 1-star General Johnnie E. Wilson, ret. 4-star General Jill Wine-Banks, General Counsel (1977–80)[537] Coast Guard Sally Brice-O'Hara, ret. 3-star Admiral, 27th Vice-Commandant (2010–12)[335] Marine Corps[335] John R. Allen, ret. 4-star General Juan G. Ayala, ret. 2-star General David M. Brahms, ret. 1-star General Stephen A. Cheney, ret. 1-star General Walter E. Gaskin, ret. 3-star General[538] Arnold L. Punaro, ret. 2-star General Navy[335] Donald Arthur, ret. 3-star Admiral, 35th Surgeon General (2004–07) Bruce E. Grooms, ret. 3-star Admiral Gail Harris, ret. Captain[114] John Hutson, ret. 2-star Admiral[539] Mark Kelly, ret. Captain and NASA astronaut[133] Jay A. DeLoach, ret. 1-star Admiral Deborah Loewer, ret. 1-star Admiral", '>>{OnePrarieOutpost} : So 88 retired guys support Trump. And nothing changed.', '>>{IphtashuFitz} : And as of September 7th, [95 retired generals and admirals were endorsing Clinton](https://www.hillaryclinton.com/briefing/updates/2016/09/07/ninety-five-retired-generals-and-admirals-endorse-hillary-clinton/).', '>>{mikeash} : They have an audacious plan to expand the US Navy to 350 ships. ...Up from its current total of 430.', '>>{Ericoster} : An appeal to authority would be voting for the Clinton/Media machine that has been pulling the string for the last 15 years.', '>>{LynxRufus} : Genetic fallacy mixed with a conspiracy theory. Nice.', ">>{Boxy310} : Next you'll tell me he has a little list of 14 candidates for the Supreme Court justices.", '>>{MidgetLovingMaxx} : Typically the Republican nominee has hundreds endorsing him. 88 is more telling of Trumps failure than an actual endorsement.', '>>{Boxy310} : Yes, but what is the plan to rebuild our Cavalry corps and reclaim the glory of pikemen?', ">>{Egorse} : >This sort of endorsement will surely give the Republican candidate a huge boost for the upcoming election and the two remaining debates. This letter was written about a month ago and it really hasn't changed anything poll wise.", '>>{Norotom5} : Exactly, our Navy is "shrinking" because Navy\'s are becoming obsolete. Ships are big, slow, hard to hide, and "easy" to sink. And, if one does start to sink, then there goes all our fancy shit, and our seamen start to drown. The best thing about the Modern Navy, is its ability to perform humanitarian relief. I got so pissed of when Pence, in the VP debate, brought up the Navy (it was more of a quip), and how it was weaker than our 1945 fleet.', ">>{DBHT14} : To be clear though when compared with current taskings and on station requirements the Navy is under fuck tons of strain. Shit like extending carrier deployments beyond a year when 6 months used to be the standard(and now the CNO says he just wants the goal to get back to 8), absolutely degrades men, ships, and morale of the force. There simply aren't enough hulls for all the places a hull is wanted, especially for platforms that require extensive lead up time between deployments, like a carrier(the rule of thumb being that it takes 3 carriers to keep 1 always on station). While the LCS program to allow smaller ships to take the place of DDG's where they are overkill has finally been acknowledged as a man power fuckup, which was a far greater problem to the program than any design error could have been. Once again trying to get away with under manning and stretching sailors thin, and then wondering why stuff keeps breaking. While the restart of the Arleigh Burke production line is welcome, if only a stopgap measure, and the 1 for 1 replacement of Nimitz for Ford hulls doesn't really solve the problem just punts it while you have temporary number inflation during the transfer every few years. To be clear there is no objective level that the USN needs to be at. But when you combine the missions it is tasked with, with the size and tools it has on hand, it is only at a borderline sustainable place, and one that does not aid in morale and retention, let alone safety or warfighting prowess.", ">>{mikeash} : You may very well be right. Unfortunately, the numbers I quoted are verbatim: the Navy really does have about 430 ships, and Trump really does want to increase it to 350. So while the idea that the Navy should be larger may have good reasons behind it, that particular proposal appears to be entirely unrelated to reality. In any case, thank you for elaborating on the current state of things, it's definitely interesting to know about.", '>>{DBHT14} : The biggest problem is really the carriers. Halfway through their life they have to go through what is called the "Refueling and Complex Overhaul" which takes each ship out of the line for about 18 months. Over runs with that, and the slow delivery of the Gerald Ford meant that when the Ike\'s overhaul went long the Teddy Roosevelt was going to leave the Gulf last Fall without an immediate replacement. In the end they forced the TR to stay on station longer and rushed the deployment of the Truman which had been thrown off by the Ike taking longer to get back into service. Making nobody happy and straining the system. The Navy has been trying to adapt, for instance the Ticonderoga class cruisers are a key but aging part of the fleet. To extend their life basically half are now being put into reserve and mothballs, while the other half gets brief refits and used up then they bring the others out of reserve to maintain the same but smaller number of ready hulls.', ">>{Lynchmobb} : Basically since the recession the military has seen extensive equipment and personnel cuts. However, the demands placed on the military to fulfill the United States' foreign obligations have continued to grow. Military really is stretched thin, and perhaps this is hyperbole, but it reminds me of the later stages of the Roman Empire. For a lot of issues it seems, Trump addresses a real problem, but fails at articulating the solution.", ">>{mikeash} : Your last sentence hits the nail on the head, I think. It's not much to his credit, though. It's pretty easy to spot problems, most of the time. Coming up with solutions is the hard part."], [">>{1000FC} : Hopefully it's gps is much more accurate than the gear s2", ">>{DetailsDetails} : I hope it can accurately read my orange's HR.", ">>{semose} : ctrl+f battery: 3-4 days, 5 on standby Hmm... maybe. I'll wait for reviews, though. Ideally, I want a week, but I don't need the GPS, so might come close with that disabled...", '>>{tacolikesweed} : Does it go faster and emit steam in this...Gear 2nd?', ">>{007meow} : I'd drop my fitbit for the Gear Fit 2 in a heartbeat, but no iOS support = no go for me, unfortunately.", '>>{j_lyf} : How big is the loss being made on these products?', '>>{studiosucof} : The Gear Fit 2 has one drawback that those other aforementioned bands don’t have: it only works with Android smartphones (4.4 or higher), whereas Fitbits, Microsoft Band, and even Garmin devices work with a variety of mobile platforms as well as desktop software. ONE drawback? More like major. Also, I am not too fond of the look.', ">>{batmanshome} : Why is it that every smartwatch has a drawback. This one won't work with other platforms and you need to press a physical button to wake it. I'm just gonna keep waiting until the technology advances sooner. Shout out to all the early adopters though, thanks for pushing the industry forward.", ">>{s629c} : The gear s2 doesn't have a built in GPS...", '>>{protoknuckles} : So the bar is set pretty low. -edit- Thanks for the gold, stranger!', ">>{TitaniuIVI} : I'd get it if it has the ability to sync with a HR chest strap. Unless they reinvented wrist HR, it's probably not accurate with lots of motion. The app it syncs with would have to be good too. Currently using a vivofit2 with the Garmin Connect app and it works pretty good, but looking to upgrade.", '>>{L1B3L} : Microsoft Band 2 is pretty close to the Fit 2, more sensors but not water resistant.', ">>{idreamofdinos} : Huh, my original Gear Fit has a toggle to use the button or to wake it by looking at it (a gyro thing, science stuff). I know the video specifically stated the physical button, but I don't know why they wouldn't have it standard on the second one as well.", ">>{007meow} : I really considered it for a while, but it's apparently bulky/not very ergonomic, battery life is meh, and pricey. Guess I'll wait for the Apple Watch 2.", ">>{Sinhumane} : Thank God. I have been eyeing the gear fit for a while, and held back because it is a bit dated. Lower price, crammed with extras, I'm sold.", '>>{StringyLow} : And Christmas shopping for my girlfriend is done. . She _loves_ her Gear Fit. Absolutely loves it. The GPS feature is going to make bicycle trips even more fun for her.', ">>{DsyelxicBob} : I wouldn't be so sure about that. The gear S and S2 can be woken by angling the screen to your face and the S2 was announced to support iOS later this year (the Fit 2 may follow suit) The Fit 2 still support all droids on KitKat and above so the support pool isn't exactly small even if it doesn't yet support iOS", ">>{atxbuttstuff} : It's only a major drawback if you use more than one platform. Most people are casual users, they don't care to sync to more than the main device that they own.", ">>{WhitePriviledge} : Why does the info at the bottom angle AWAY from you? It looks like it's setup for someone to wear it on their right wrist.", ">>{brunes} : All I want is a watch with an analog face that lasts 2 years on a battery, with an LCD smart watch on the back, Why doesn't anyone make this? I tried Android Wear, it's a failure IMO.", ">>{EBOV1} : 4 GB Storage doesn't sound like a selling point. MicroUSB? No USB-C? No wireless charging? Watching people try to plug microUSB into these tiny devices is so painful.", '>>{SUM_TIN_W0NG} : I wish they would work on the battery life before adding more stuff.', ">>{ShroudedSciuridae} : I don't know if it's still ongoing, but I picked up my Band 2 last week when they dropped the price $75. I love it, but the battery life does require you charge it daily. Since it's not waterproof though, I just do it when I shower.", '>>{LetsJerkCircular} : I wish they\'d just call it by the year. It\'s already a higher number than any of their devices and it\'s doable if they call it the "Samsung," "Model," (Galaxy S, Note, Tab, Gear, VR, etc.) and Year. Samsung Galaxy Gear Fit 16.', '>>{chris480} : It appears to come in a dark magenta though.', '>>{N-ST} : I heard they discontinued the production of the G3. The promises of its success were a bit inflated.', ">>{VolofTN} : I don't feel 4 GB is a problem. I can fit a lot of music in 4 GB. It may not be the highest quality, but with Bluetooth playback, it's not going to make a difference.", '>>{relevantsun} : The gps probably only turns on during exercises such as running', '>>{CaughtInRye} : Ya but it also gives you insatiable hunger for meat.', ">>{Str8Thugin} : [Can't wait to see what awesome commercials they come up for this one](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8jsDWV8YpQ)", '>>{37214} : Bought a gear fit last night for $45. eBay, here I come!', ">>{OptionalCookie} : Many say the same about the Apple watch,and I agree with Samsung on this. If you buy an apple watch and have no apple phone you are out of luck. Why? Well if you have Android, you can get an open source app, but if you have Samsung then it's cool. 😎 so Samsung can just keep selling to Android users. And that's OK.", '>>{DanWallace} : Honestly I have zero use for the xiaomi bands until they open it up to third party apps. I just want to able to use it as my sleep as android tracker.', '>>{tacolikesweed} : I heard, initially, it shrunk upon use of G3', '>>{alexefi} : the only reason why i switched from gear fir to fitbit HR is because gear fit needs to be activated to read heartbeat, it doesnt do that constantly like fitbit, and shows when i was doing something and when i was just laying on bed and wave my hand.. hope this one will do constant heart rate monitor and keep record..', '>>{Xainkungjee} : Thats really good...Gear fit is the face of mordern era.Samsung worked great in Gear Fit 1.Its time to rock the party again.I want to be the first to get it...😘', '>>{diagoro1} : I have the first model. Major issues with keeping a tracking signal, or the requirement of using 3rd party app to track workouts. But one of the biggest gripes is losing all my settings when the battery drains. Major pita to reset everything numerous times due to limited battery life.', ">>{TomfromLondon} : I love mine BUT it's not that the battery doesn't last each day, it's that I'm about to send my 4th for replacement as the battery died.", ">>{TomfromLondon} : No, he is saying it only works with android, that's the drawback.", '>>{Ryesagain} : I have the original and the only reason I stopped using it was because the band broke and I haven\'t replaced it. I loved how it had apps on google play for lots of different things. The music control was so handy. Using it as a camera remote was great. Reading texts, emails, even as a camera viewer was all right. It even had apps that let you reply to texts/emails but I didn\'t try those out since they were 3rd party and had bad reviews. The screen wasn\'t very accurate for typing text or numbers in a calculator or keyboard but the screen wasn\'t this big. It might be better to do that now. The waterproofing is great, it was rated by ifixit as like a 8 or 9 out of ten to fix yourself. I liked how I could lock the phone if my gear fit lost bluetooth, or lock apps with an app. Though I think that\'s available for any wearables on Android. The original did lag with 3rd party apps but that\'s something that was a dev problem, I think. It was "bring to your face" activated and I\'m not sure if I liked needing to do that to activate it but it was so much more handy then pulling a big phone out all the time for anything. So I don\'t think they would remove it, I think In the video you can clearly see it activating while she moves it. This looks promising. Though I only paid $50 for mine, it really opened my eyes to how handy smart watches and wearables are. If this one is faster and more accurate with 3rd party apps I might consider this over a pebble. Edit some typos. Also loved having a flashlight on my wrist and the amazing wallpaper customization, though it had little 1st party support for watch faces or having date/steps/hr/cal burned added to those watch faces. And the 3rd party apps that let you change those faces wouldn\'t give access to date/steps/hr/calories burned. Also as a construction worker it still didn\'t have any scratches on the screen! The silver trim flaked and faded though. I was not easy on this device and it still looks good. This was my first smart watch and it made me realize how intuitive touch screens are on them. But it also helped me realize how many smart watches never have a fully rounded spec list and it\'s getting so old. I have seen so many that someone should be able to make the full package by now. a waterproof smart watch that syncs to your phone, has 3rd party support, an accurate heart rate monitor and step counter/gps, touch, accurate flick wrist activation, accurate touch screen, full screen customization, 5 to 7 day battery life. It\'s been so long since I thought about it I can\'t remember because I\'ve seen so many that always had 1 or 2 missing important features.', ">>{getddt} : Love my Garmin Fenix 3 HR. Admittedly it's a fitness watch first, smart watch 2nd, but it ticked nearly all the boxes for me.", ">>{pipsqeek} : You know what would be nice, Samsung? If you didn't install the software for it even when I don't fucking own the device.", '>>{Totallynotatheif} : Maybe a pebble 2 or core would be more suitable?', '>>{Squarkle} : You are aware this is Samsung, right? Adding more stuff is their way to start the morning.', ">>{Millicent_Bystandard} : They've recently started doing this for their newer phones - Samsung Galaxy J7-16 for example.", ">>{QuasisLogic} : I've demoed this product. My only complaint is I've not managed to get it off since I've put it on. And now it feels like I'm always stuck in second gear.", ">>{Young_Lincoln} : Depending on your intended use and if you want a big AMOLED display vs. an always on, smaller display with buttons, a Pebble smartwatch might work for you. They just started a kickstarter with new models focused on HR tracking and fitness which have a week or 10 days for each model. Really depends on what's important to you, but I'm happy with mine.", ">>{chandler25} : I've expected greater things. Maybe some holographic display.", ">>{MalenkoMC} : I'm waiting for the smart watch that will tell me when I need to drink some water because my body is dehydrated or something along those lines. Heart rate is all fine and dandy, but there are other things that would be more useful to me.", '>>{LaneySKillz} : I love nothing more than to see people with a activity tracker/fitness band forget to recharge it And then flip shit when they realize none of their steps got logged Meanwhile here i am . . . Going on two years without having to change the battery.', '>>{SUM_TIN_W0NG} : It was more of a wish for all the companies to put a decent priority on it.', ">>{Mughi} : I guess it hasn't been your day, your week, your month, or even your year, has it?", '>>{one80oneday} : My wife loves the first gen Gear Fit and will probably get Gear Fit 2 for Xmas', '>>{Tachyons_for_days} : Yeah, I like almost everything about the Band except...the band. Having the battery or whatever it is sticking off the bottom of my wrist was just awkward.', '>>{febrig} : If I were to get this device - will I be missing out on alot, as an iPhone-user?', '>>{EBOV1} : Actually the newer 4.1+ bluetooth audio protocol stack this device supports can stream higher bitrates its predecessors. So it would make a difference, if you had the storage.', '>>{WarHammer_15} : They really need to simplify there product names, make them more appealing like Samsung Fit 2 or something', '>>{piyushr21} : So they are just like Apple, but with android inside.', ">>{Bakonati} : It has a dock with metal contacts that you place it on. Funny it isn't on the main product page.", '>>{Bakonati} : I wondered if that was what you meant. I got my Gear Fit 2 yesterday. The cradle is magnetic and the fit just magically slips onto the cradle to charge. Nice design.', '>>{andretan} : Yes. It will sync with S Health app if I am not wrong.', ">>{Uk101abc} : I bought one. The screen is excellent but the crappy Samsung gear app and choices of other apps really let it down. I can't even see a place to edit stride length, enter height etc for that setup. Can't get it to communicate with other apps I use such as myfitnesspal. Feel made a mistake buying it"]]

classify and reply

['>>{target_locked} : I have switched my default search engine to duck duck go and I suggest others do the same.', '>>{BlueDuster} : Bernie Sanders: "I know emotions are running high but we have to come together and support Secretary Clinton. She has won the nomination process by getting the most votes and I back her fully to prevent a Trump presidency and call on all my supporters to do the same."', ">>{beer_30} : We don't need USA Today to figure that one out.", '>>{the_schlonger} : #Fuck Google. And fuck any other company that supports NAFTA, TPP, open borders, H1B visas, and the whole host of other bullshit that neo-conservatives and neo-liberals are using to undermine the middle class in America and drive jobs and money overseas instead of keeping it here at home.', '>>{Ctrshill547} : Hey guys (((Google))) is not biased, Trumpkins should stop complaining .', '>>{BugFix} : Seriously, what\'s in the guy\'s head right now? "Gee, I have a meeting scheduled with Clinton in a few hours. I know! I should call a news conference and start throwing bombs at the DNC ahead of that. Surely this will improve my negotiating position." Just watch folks: he doesn\'t give a shit about Trump. He\'ll continue with the bomb-throwing all the way through and past the convention. At some point he\'s just going to end up looking like a joke.', ">>{TheBernFather} : Sour grapes from bitter old man. I'd say better luck next time but we all know he's going to drop dead at any moment.", ">>{rdf-} : Kasich didn't endorse, Ted Cruz didn't endorse. Why are you endorsing, Mr. Sanders? It makes you look weak.", '>>{BillTowne} : Apparently the Speaker has veto on who can speak and the current speaker, who is a conservative politician from our closest ally, thinks that the current President of the US is unfit to appear in the Parliament. >**Bercow\'s speech was met with a round of applause** from MPs in the Commons, which in usual circumstances is banned practice. Veteran Labour MP Dennis Skinner stood up to say "well done" to the House speaker. >Opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn tweeted shortly after the speech: "Well said John Bercow. We must stand up for our country\'s values. Trump\'s State Visit should not go ahead." >Corbyn\'s Labour colleague Harriet Harman tweeted saying it was **a "proud moment" for the House of Commons**. In a statement, Liberal Democrat party leader leader Tim Farron said: "Trump should be under no illusion. **We are snubbing him.**"', ">>{target_locked} : I don't have a problem with H1B's in some fields they are absolutely necessary in order to keep us at the cutting edge of every field possible. I would suggest changing H1B's to a minimum salary of 100,000 dollars, or in the case of an American worker being displaced, a 30,000 dollar tax per year for each H1B. Remove financial incentives and H1B's will go back to actually being used as intended.", '>>{team-fyi} : Angry phone call to England coming in 3....2....1....', '>>{throwaw4yyyyy} : Drumpftards will be shitting themselves as everyone credible begins to go for the only choice this election, Hillary Rodham Clinton. 1000 years of Democratic rule is at hand!', ">>{TerryYockey} : Sorry if it sounds like a silly question, but isn't the DC primary today? I can find nothing on any news network aside from the tragedy in Orlando.", '>>{Veniabiit} : I have an exclusive preview of the DNC answering that request. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CraFZDtvreo', '>>{majikmyk} : Why the hell does Google even have an opinion on this? Would the TPP even affect them?', ">>{GuruOfGravity} : Bernie. Thanks and I agree, it wasn't about you it was the ideas and policies and no we don't want to give those ideas up, and no we don't think Hillary will bother with anything but more of the bad.", '>>{pengins4life} : Well, some of us do but Trump supporters only trust the media when its on "their side".', ">>{the_ewok_slayer} : >It is customary for visiting Presidents to address MPs and Lords in Westminster Hall when making state visits to the UK. No, it isn't. Obama is the only US president to have done that in Westminster Hall.", '>>{redditzendave} : >By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump. Wow, coming from Fox Lite USA Today, interesting, this may actually reverse global warming as hell freezes over.', '>>{QuestionTheNWO} : Remember when republicans claimed Obama had lowered the standing of the USA in the eyes of foreign leaders.', '>>{TerryYockey} : >Surely this will improve my negotiating position "and surely this will get super delegates to support me".', ">>{ini0n} : The problem is they literally could run their servers off orphan blood and we'd still use it. No reason for them to be pro-consumer.", ">>{StonerMeditation} : I'm voting for Clinton because she'll be a great president, but I was a Bernie supporter before. I’m proud to be voting for Hillary. And I want Trump to be trounced at the polls - I want Trump's 'message' discredited, his racist hate speech diminished, and to show that America still has a heart. I'm not in a swing state.", '>>{JordanFromSales} : There is so much hate towards donald trump, being spun and reinforced by the MSM who benefit greatly from a Clinton presidency. It really makes me sad. I follow the Money when I vote not a newspaper. "The fascists of the future will call themselves anti-fascists" - Churchill', ">>{SLDM206} : I'm tired of voting for the lesser of two evils, Bern.", '>>{darksiderising} : [Since you like following the money, you must be demanding Trump to release his tax returns so that you can do so.](https://media.giphy.com/media/3oz8xWYAWRpJfcNbYQ/giphy.gif)', '>>{adamant2009} : It is. Results are expected around 8pm EST.', ">>{empanadacat} : The juxtaposition of stories like this and Google's manipulation of autocomplete results makes me feel like the whole world is a conspiracy.", ">>{WeJustOrderedBisque} : This is actual leadership, contrary to what people on here might think. Torpedoing your policy goals and ensuring what you view as the worst possible outcome because you were treated unfairly isn't. Sanders has spent his entire life fighting for progressive policy that helps everybody. He's continuing to do so.", ">>{team-fyi} : Unless someone dials the phone for him; you're probably right.", '>>{team-fyi} : The Apprentice had better ratings than Sherlock.', ">>{bearsandgiants} : you fail to realize that it's Clinton who needs Bernie, not the other way around.", ">>{Risley} : Then be sure to check out how Trump's own fucking charity [isn't properly licensed to accept donations](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-foundation-lacks-the-certification-required-for-charities-that-solicit-money/2016/09/29/7dac6a68-8658-11e6-ac72-a29979381495_story.html). Fucking amateur hour, and you think this idiot can run the country. Don't worry, we got you. Well make sure hes humiliated on election day and save you from him.", '>>{92Lean} : No! She is part of the problem. She is a long ways from a solution.', ">>{pudgyfuck} : Please, I've seen WAY bigger things than Ben, I can promise you. Sad!", ">>{waste-of-skin} : CTR is too busy adding mud to the waters here to vote in online polls. At least they claim they're busy, I think they're just lazy", ">>{stevebeyten} : Uhh considering she beat him by 3.5M votes and her lead on trump is growing while trump keeps lobbing bombs at himself, I'd suggest her need of him is shrinking.", ">>{BugFix} : With Mr. Best Words on the opposite side of the ballot? It doesn't seem likely. If Sanders wants a deal, he needs to cut it right now before Clinton pulls ahead by 12+ and stops picking up the phone.", '>>{AngerMacFadden} : CLinton has already shown she needs all the help.she can get, so I agree.', '>>{AngerMacFadden} : CLinton has already shown she needs all the help.she can get, so I agree.', ">>{soccerman95} : I don't believe a single word of this. Especially after the email leak. He isn't the same fighter he was 3 months ago. WHAT DID DNC/CLINTON DO TO YOU BERNIE??", '>>{cofman} : You forgot the main one. "Fake News"', '>>{ward0630} : If I were a Sanders supporter, my concern would be that Sanders is letting his clout go sour. If he really decides to keep going to the convention, then why should Hillary negotiate with him instead of appealing directly to his supporters? I mean, what is he going to do?', '>>{bullshit_inspector_} : Okay Bernie, we will get right on that. Just let us finish appointing Hillary first.', '>>{AngerMacFadden} : I agree, her biggest strength is still all of the people rushing to prop her up.', ">>{TheTaoOfBill} : I don't know if you noticed but Trump is collapsing. And Hillary hasn't even gotten her post nomination bump yet. Bernie lost. He needs Hillary to be on board more than Hillary needs Bernie to be on board. If Bernie wants to keep lobbing bombs at the DNC that's fine. But he's not going to get anything from the DNC.", '>>{Ovedya2011} : Are Bernie supporters that loyal, or that stupid, that they would throw in with a crook who stands for everything Bernie opposes?', '>>{OrganicEarlGrey} : Because he feels differently about Hillary than Kasich/Cruz feel about Trump? This is a very bizarre false equivalency', ">>{NateGrey} : > waste-of-skin: CTR is too busy adding mud to the waters here to vote in online polls. At least they claim they're busy, I think they're just lazy Any proof?", '>>{DigitalDoggi} : We get censored by other countries, Google gets to exist globally. Yay!!! TPP !!!', '>>{BugFix} : The polls say otherwise. And blackmail makes a very poor negotiating position when it\'s toothless. You\'ll never vote for Clinton anyway, so your vote doesn\'t matter. She\'ll can win it with a left-leaning progressive landslide or a centrist coalition. And Sanders is picking "centrist" right now.', '>>{waste-of-skin} : Why would I provide proof for a comment I posted in the wrong thread?', ">>{the_schlonger} : That sounds reasonable, but unfortunately that's not what Hillary Clinton/Google/Facebook/Etc want. They want Hillary to expand the program so they can use H1B visas to import cheap tech workers to undercut Americans on salary and drive down employment costs for the tech giants that donate heavily to the DNC.", '>>{thehalfwit} : 3,500 years. We are obviously witnessing the birth of a God Emperor.', '>>{Deadeyebyby} : Rather a weasel than the two rats. Also would you prefer he dropkick them? Because I think I would.', ">>{BenitoPerezGaldos} : Here's a link to the actual editorial. Idk why we are reading a news article about the editorial instead of just the actual article... http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/09/29/dont-vote-for-donald-trump-editorial-board-editorials-debates/91295020/", '>>{chimthegrim} : Yea, me too. I need someone in an appropriate position to tell me what to like or who to vote for.', ">>{BatCountry9} : It's important that Trump loses badly (bigly!) His coalition of nativists and uneducated shitheads cannot be seen as a viable election vehicle for the next populist demagogue who comes along.", ">>{BedWedOrBehead} : You're wasting your vote, she's never going to win!1!", '>>{macredsmile} : Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. How about the 28 pages. The world is run by evil people.', ">>{ITGuy_higgins} : Well, we're probably going to have to call Barack back to actually make that 'apology tour' the right was accusing him of doing for years after this...", '>>{all2humanuk} : Woah! Trump\'s not going to like this. What about his freedom of speech? "Westminster is a college right Steve? we can cut their funding?"', '>>{Ginkgopsida} : Is it not common to have lively discussions in the Parliament? Could have been interesting. On the other hand, we can look forward to Trumps hatefull tweets.', '>>{georgiapeanuts} : No we will not acquiesce. I respect you Bernie like fam, but you do you and we will do we.', '>>{WeJustOrderedBisque} : Oh, a Donald Trump supporter will disavow Bernie? What will he do?', '>>{Hashslingingslashar} : Please by all means rack up the score!!', '>>{oneeasypod} : looks like his "exclusive" trade deal with England is about to hit brick wall. What are the great trade deals that are supposed to pay for this wall again? Where is the economic boom that will pay for these tax cuts?', '>>{brave_new_whirl} : Overrated failing piece of garbage parliament! SAD! /s', '>>{target_locked} : That is entirely correct. Thus I do not in any way support Clinton or her cronies.', '>>{kbounce24} : How long until Trump says it was his decision not to go?', '>>{grammaticalfailure} : They should ban Theresa May from speaking in Parliament.', ">>{Tasty_Yams} : So, nothing about universal healthcare, college debt, wages, wall street reform? All those rallies and volunteer hours and all the money -- is going to go to his petty, personal vendetta against Debbie Wasserman Shultz? That's what this was all about?", ">>{yugtahtmi} : Less weak and more selfless, pretty typical of him. Sticking to his word and all that considering he said at the beginning of the process that he would back her if he lost to prevent a Trump victory. Same reason he won't run as a 3rd party", '>>{intravenus_de_milo} : You could say "supporters" I\'d say shill account from /r/the_donald.', ">>{aManPerson} : that's a shame. i would have loved for those rowdy folk to berate him and treat him like the slag he is.", '>>{the_ewok_slayer} : They addressed parliament in the Royal Gallery, not Westminster Hall.', '>>{ORA_ORA_ORA_ORA} : They cloned him and stuffed the real Bernie in the closet of one of the two post offices he renamed.', ">>{Tasty_Yams} : So, nothing about universal healthcare, student debt, wages, wall street reform? All those rallies and volunteer hours and all the money -- is going to go to his petty, personal vendetta against Debbie Wasserman Shultz? That's what this was all about?", ">>{escalation} : I agree. Requirement for a minimum salary that exceeds the industry/company average for the position. If they're good enough to justify bringing them over a US citizen, then they'd better be good enough to pay them for their responsibilities. Upshot would be we'd still get the best talent, but we wouldn't have companies undercutting labor costs by bringing in half competent workers for less money. Country keeps its competitive edge by pillaging the best of foreign talent, without flooding the market and pushing out shoddy products.", '>>{HBombthrow} : And you need us if you want any of the policies you say you care about to actually be implemented in this country', '>>{thatpj} : *Yeah because Hillary and her supporters have treated Sanders supporters with so much respect this election season....*', '>>{the_ewok_slayer} : Reagan and Clinton addressed parliament in the Royal Gallery, not Westminster Hall.', '>>{SLDM206} : Who? Cause that could be both HRC and Drumpf. Also, there are other candidates out there. People complain about the US being a two party shit show yet are terrified to vote independent/green', ">>{TheTaoOfBill} : With how terrible Trump is doing I'll take those odds. No one is going to risk voting for Sanders if there is a possibility of Trump winning. Bernie himself already said he wouldn't run 3rd party anyway. And as his supporters won't shut up about... he's a man of his word.", '>>{BugFix} : By the convention it will be too late even to play spoiler as an "independent". Again, if he wants to cut a deal, he needs to cut it now. His options for affecting national policy as a presidential candidate are fast running out.', ">>{yugtahtmi} : You act as if Trump is some savior of Democracy. He's as much a part of the problem as every establishment politician.", ">>{CAPSLOCK44} : Yup, and yet somehow everybody believes everything everyone says about Trump despite him existing in the public eye all his life, being friends with Al Sharpton and Dennis Rodman, letting veterans use his private airplane to go home early from their tour when the government wouldn't do it, and even getting personally involved to stop a mugging on the streets of NYC. Obviously he's an evil racist Hitler wannabe who is going to ruin the country, I'm sure that has nothing to do with the entire mediasphere and tech industry being completely against him because he doesn't take their money.", '>>{supertopbop22} : Now we know why Google is backing Hillary. Both Google and Hillary support the TPP that will gut the middle class while both Bernie and Trump oppose the TPP.', ">>{nfineon} : So it appears they've gone full evil, looks like they are no longer on our side", '>>{ward0630} : I get why you might feel that Hillary has disrespected you, but appealing to the similarities between herself and Sanders while highlighting the differences between herself and Trump is a compelling argument.', '>>{Slapbox} : Yep. Not anywhere on the internet. Reported.', ">>{Sieggi858} : You're arguing semantics, who cares WHERE it was done?", ">>{noatccount} : Does anyone support DWS, even Clinton folks? She's done a shit job with the democratic party, losing state houses, governorships, the senate and has generally been a dividing figure.", '>>{the_ewok_slayer} : It may not make a difference to Americans, but addressing Parliament in Westminster Hall is a rare honour afforded to very few foreign leaders. It is somewhat newsworthy that Trump is not going to be addressing Parliament. It is not at all newsworthy that it isn\'t going to be in Westminster Hall, because no one in their right mind would expect him to be given that privilege (I was surprised when Obama was, to be honest). At any rate, my comment was 100% factual. I didn\'t say Obama was the only one to address Parliament, I said he was the only one to address Parliament "in Westminster Hall." The article is wrong in saying that US presidents do that customarily.', ">>{RayWhelans} : Well as a Sanders supporter and now (presumably) a Clinton supporter, I still think this is the right move. DWS sucks at her job. She's an awful communicator. She showed favoritism towards another candidate, and she doesn't have Sanders' supporters faith. This is how politics work. There are consequences for doing a bad job, and I don't think it's extreme to suggest changes to the primary process (hopefully that also means the abolition of caucuses) and ousting DWS. And Sanders request non-withstanding, I still think it was entirely possible DWS was getting the boot regardless so that she could be the sacrificial lamb for party unity. And it's not like Sanders is the first to complain. [Obama was apparently very ready to oust her in 2012.](http://www.businessinsider.com/report-tensions-between-obama-and-debbie-wasserman-schultz-2014-9) It's time for her to go. Let's find someone that knows how to communicate and knows how to make all Americans feel welcome.", ">>{KeyboardChap} : For comparison [here's the speech Mr Bercow made to welcome Obama when he spoke to Parliament.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fj9kG7zKx_o)", ">>{BAHatesToFly} : > So, nothing about universal healthcare, student debt, wages, wall street reform? You mean the things that have been the cornerstones of literally every stump speech, TV appearance, debate, rally, and campaign email he's given in the last year?", '>>{IVIaskerade} : Google is not biased. (((they are)))', ">>{MisanthropicAtheist} : Donald Trump isn't fit to appear on an episode of Jerry Springer.", ">>{nba2k16CRASH} : Nope. We know what we would get with a Clinton presidency. Trump might even turn out to be a decent president. I aint gonna vote for him, but you're not fear mongering me into voting for Clinton.", ">>{a__technicality} : I think that says a lot about the two choices doesn't it?", '>>{Chuck419} : On a side note, British people sounded more "American" prior to 1776 and through most of modern history. It\'s only in the past 100-150 years they started talking with goofy accents. https://www.google.com/amp/amp.livescience.com/33652-americans-brits-accents.html?client=safari', ">>{devilwearspantsuits} : I work for one of the tech giants now. They have been cutting regular employees in place of more overseas temps (it's a remote position). I can already see this happening tenfold with TPP. It's despicable and it's almost undoubtedly going to be passed.", '>>{Longgrassmcgraw} : At this point, what country can he go to where he will be warmly welcomed?', '>>{trump_rises} : Yup, sneak this in on a Friday night for maximum ability to shove it under the rug.', '>>{knashoj} : This is a already a strong contender as the best burn of 2017 (emphasis is mine): > In the past we have hosted speeches from leaders in equality, justice and human rights from Mandela to Obama to Aung San Suu Kyi. **Trump is not fit to shine their shoes.** It\'s a brilliant use of the old racist "shoe-shining" trope.', '>>{nunudodo} : Tfw ...? Better Google that shit cause it saved you three fucking words. Edit: three fucking words ...Tfw', ">>{SixVISix} : Supporting the antithesis of your platform while evidence that the candidate you're now supporting manufactured your loss isn't selfless. It's suspect.", ">>{TheTaoOfBill} : Too bad he isn't going to run 3rd party. He's already said that. He refuses to let Trump win over Hillary. So I'm not even sure why you're suggesting that's on the table. It's not. Bernie has zero leverage to make demands unless he promises to stop attacking the DNC. If he can't make that promise then there is no deal to make.", ">>{DumpsterDon} : lol. The US's best ally tells Trump to fuck off. How did we get here?", ">>{BAHatesToFly} : > Just watch folks: he doesn't give a shit about Trump. He outright called Trump a racist when Hillary was refusing to. He's been mentioning how awful Donald Trump is in his rally speeches for *months* now. But by all means, continue speculating in a very specific way in order to denigrate him.", ">>{kalimashookdeday} : > And as his supporters won't shut up about And as the opposition won't shut up about telling him to bow out...", '>>{jsmooth7} : If it makes you feel any better, the autocomplete manipulation story turned out to not be true.', '>>{Annihilicious} : Weird. The tech giants want to make money?', ">>{DumpsterDon} : Preach it. It would be like a visiting UK PM addressing Congress in Independence hall. Not an exact analogy, but one meant to demonstrate how rare it is. edit: here's a list of those that have addressed both Houses of the United Kingdom Parliament in Westminster Hall since 1939: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_who_have_addressed_both_Houses_of_the_United_Kingdom_Parliament 21 June 2012 Aung San Suu Kyi Burmese Opposition Leader Westminster Hall 25 May 2011 Barack Obama President of the United States Westminster Hall 20 March 2012 Elizabeth II Queen of the United Kingdom Westminster Hall 17 September 2010 Benedict XVI Pope (state visit) Westminster Hall 11 July 1996 Nelson Mandela President of South Africa Westminster Hall 6 May 1995 Elizabeth II Queen of the United Kingdom Westminster Hall 7 April 1960 Charles de Gaulle President of France Westminster Hall 26 October 1950 George VI King of the United Kingdom Westminster Hall 23 March 1939 Albert Lebrun President of France Westminster Hall Dumpster will never be on that list.", ">>{hotcaulk} : I'm so sorry England. King George III was a dick but we promise we'll behave this time!", '>>{Sean_Spicer_WH} : Yeah?! Well, *PARLIAMENT* is banned from speaking in the White House! What do you think about *THAT*, fake news parliament?!', ">>{BAHatesToFly} : > Uhh considering she beat him by 3.5M votes She beat him by that margin amongst mainly Democrats. The Democratic Primary results don't have much to do with the GE because everyone gets to vote in the GE. Funny that Hillary supporters want to ignore polling (that includes likely voters of any/no party) that shows Sanders beating Trump by larger margins that Hillary because they're 'too far away' from the GE to be predictors, but *do* want to include results from closed primaries in March.", '>>{SixVISix} : Please explain what "true strength" means for those of us who don\'t understand.', '>>{northbud} : I think he may be giving a public peek at his position on the meeting.', '>>{dn00} : New user OP. Quote seems made up too. Falsify the Record.', '>>{Tasteslikebluemilk} : Unless the final wikileak shows she didnt get the most votes...', '>>{PixelBlock} : The robber barons just wanted to be financially comfortable too. So did the owners of company towns. Why stop them?', '>>{kevinnetter} : before the imposition of the migrant ban I would myself have been strongly opposed to an address by President Trump in Westminster Hall. After the imposition of the migrant ban by President Trump I am even more strongly opposed to an address by President Trump in Westminster Hall.', '>>{Neverpleasedawoman} : The fact the hillbots have been on-board with her getting booted means it will do nothing.', '>>{PixelBlock} : Off a cliff, maybe. One step forward, one hundred floors down.', '>>{DocGonzo13} : Guess we can guess how they will act in regards to Net Neutrality', ">>{mycroft2000} : Foreigner here. I had literally *never* heard of anyone describing Obama as anything less than eloquent and dignified until I learned from Reddit that there are Republicans who act as you describe. He never embarrassed America; but *they* sure do. I can't even bear to watch Trump speak. It makes my skin crawl.", ">>{poultrypunisher} : Because of DC's superdelegates (26), Hillary won the primary before we even voted (only 20 pledged delegates).", '>>{TerryYockey} : If he had a legitimate shot at running third-party and winning, he would have done that from the start, rather than run as a Democrat.', '>>{SirCabbage} : Whatever happened to "Don\'t be Evil" google? What ever happened to that.', '>>{arthurpaliden} : Clinton, Obama, the President of China and even the President of Mexico have addressed Parliament.', '>>{empanadacat} : You mean Google denied it. Hardly the same thing as "it\'s not true."', '>>{BugFix} : By demanding something Clinton can\'t concede? No. He\'s throwing shoes into the gearworks just to be an asshole. The position he\'s signaling is "concede **this** you bitch!".', '>>{other_suns} : So could Joe Biden, or Elizabeth Warren. Any liberal third party candidate is president Trump.', ">>{other_suns} : If they were concerned with being called violent psychopaths they probably shouldn't have harassed people with violent death threats.", ">>{TerryYockey} : Further, isn't most of DC's population black, who tend to overwhelmingly be Clinton supporters?", ">>{thatpj} : Not really. It's nothing that hasn't already been said in the past.", '>>{jsmooth7} : Google didn\'t just deny it. They provided an explanation that makes perfectly good sense. The autocomplete algorithm is designed to avoid suggesting disparaging results about people. Try searching "trump crim" in google and bing and see what they suggest. Only bing will suggest "trump crimes". Also the video used both bing and yahoo search as a comparison, however yahoo search *uses* bing to power it. So that is highly misleading.', '>>{the_schlonger} : Tech giants already make a ridiculous amount of money. Companies like Google and Facebook are literally some of the most profitable companies on Earth. The issue is that there is no level of profit/growth that is ever "good enough" for the market, so they will always try to shed jobs and outsource rather than continuing at a sustainable profitability level that employs as many people as possible.', '>>{the_schlonger} : For what? Toeing the line of the blood-sucking 1% wall street fat cats?', ">>{the_schlonger} : TPP and un-fair trade is a big part of why I'm willing to switch from Bernie to Trump. I strongly dislike a lot of what Trump says, but I'm willing to put up with it if it means electing someone who will preserve the middle class and stop increasing income inequality by allowing American companies to replace middle class jobs with foreign workers.", ">>{RayWhelans} : I wouldn't mind Martin O'Malley as a replacement. He's looking for work, he's charismatic and a good communicator, and he seemed to not be too fond of the DNC or their ways during the debates. How do we feel about O'Malley taking the job?", ">>{Tasty_Yams} : Yeah. Those. Exactly. What happened to those? I thought that's what he cared about. Now this is about revenge?", ">>{oblivioustoobvious} : He's painted evil by the public incorrectly and correctly.", ">>{lilrabbitfoofoo} : I remember Trump over the past 30 years. He's always been a narcissistic nut, a charlatan and snake-oil salesman trading on his father's money and name. Nothing more.", '>>{empanadacat} : This is horseshit. It autocompletes "Lyin\' Ted" and "Jeb is a mess"', ">>{a57782} : It is kind of adorable how there seem to be Sanders supporters who seem almost offended that some Clinton supporters aren't fond of them. Like people are still going to like them after months of being called shills, corrupt or low-information. What do you know, they don't like being treated the way they've been treating other people.", ">>{TheTaoOfBill} : I care about every one of those issues. Which is why I voted for Hillary. Her positions on those issues were well thought out and addressed the political realities. Sander's positions on those issues were unrealistic overly optimistic both in political support and in numbers, and risked discrediting the entire movement which his over ambitious promises and overly expensive solutions.", '>>{travis-} : Debbie is on MSNBC right now and said she will refuse to step down.', ">>{youdidntreddit} : No, she's done a shit job. Then again I am no Hillary partisan, just think she's smarter than Bernie.", '>>{jsmooth7} : So what? It also autocompletes "hillary cr" to "hillary crooked" and "hillary f" to "hillary fbi"', ">>{golikehellmachine} : I'm a pretty solid Clinton supporter, but there'll be no love lost if DWS hits the road at the DNC. Her performance there has been pretty abysmal. That said, I think Sanders is walking a pretty fine line here; as a participant in the process, I *do* think he has some valid points to make about how the party goes about the nominating process. However, I want the DNC to, first and foremost, represent Democrats. Sanders' proposed reforms tilt significantly towards independents and unaffiliated candidates.", ">>{golikehellmachine} : I don't know enough about O'Malley's organizing skills; one of the Dean's biggest strengths (one of the better chairs in recent history) was his ability to organize at the local, state, regional and national level. Now, he wasn't the greatest of all time or anything, but he was pretty damn effective in the role, and he had demonstrated all of those skills during his tenure as governor and during his presidential run. Does O'Malley have the same kind of skill set?", ">>{golikehellmachine} : I don't think Frank would be able to figure out how to run candidates in conservative districts all that well. He definitely knows how to compromise, but he's not particularly good at masking his contempt - something that the DNC chair is going to have to do in purple and reddish districts - in order to get a foothold at the state level. I say this as a Barney Frank superfan.", ">>{kniteli} : So did Bayer, United fruit co, the Pinkertons. Making money does not mean you're right.", ">>{L_Cranston_Shadow} : And why shouldn't they? They have literally no reason to give up money on the table based on some sense of loyalty. At least in the near term they don't have to worry about people not affording their product, and there is a rising middle class in several countries that are becoming able to use Google and these other companies' products and services.", ">>{Tasty_Yams} : He doesn't like Frank either. He's among the dozens of liberals in this country that don't pass the Sanders purity test. Maybe he can get Cornell West.", ">>{BAHatesToFly} : It's not either/or. He's capable of caring about all of those things, like he's been doing for a year, and *also* caring about removing current DNC leadership. Just because he gives one speech doesn't mean that he's forgotten any of the things that he's been *hammering* on for a year. Jesus. You people will dig and dig for even a scrap to try and fight him on.", '>>{Tasty_Yams} : Wow, look at all that free speech down at the bottom of this post.', ">>{Tasty_Yams} : Then why spend your political capital on petty revenge? I can get behind universal health care and lowering student debt. But his priority is going after people he feels wronged him? For fucks sake, use this as an opportunity to move your agenda! Not for salty retribution. It makes me think that what they say is true: He's drank his own kool aid.", ">>{other_suns} : Probably easier to say he's not among the dozens of liberals that do pass the purity test.", '>>{kingdowngoat} : All he needs to do is win the presidency and he can do that. Only one problem...', ">>{WhySettle4Less} : True, but removing one of that [Hydra's heads](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lernaean_Hydra) is a good start.", ">>{a57782} : Then you shouldn't be getting mad at people when people call you violent psychopaths because that's the fault of some Sanders supporters.", ">>{WhySettle4Less} : Hillbots are hoping that the elimination of one of Hillary's [hatchet (wo)men](http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hatchet%20man) will deflect attention from her role in the Democratic primary rigging and provide her with plausible deniability. It won't. It's an old stunt weasels in leadership ranks routinely pull.", ">>{justanidiotloser} : Nope. But that's what you're going to hear. If there's a link to the full video anywhere it's worth a watch if you're actually curious.", '>>{Esteway} : Not necessarily but if she is replaced it should be because the party decides it is for the best, not because sore loser Bernie is trying to settle scores for perceived slights.', ">>{Tasty_Yams} : I'm sorry but I just don't understand this. There are literally millions of Clinton supporters like me who can get behind what Sanders stands for - even if we didn't think he was the best candidate. I WANT HIM TO PUSH THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY TO THE LEFT. But fuck him if he's going to squander this opportunity by exacting revenge on the DNC.", '>>{a57782} : > Run third party, then the cackle and her supporters can collectively shit their pants and whine about the lost election. And then you guys will get to shit your pants and whine when a conservative supreme court stymies your revolution and begins to undo even more progress, but hey at least you guys got to stick it to Hillary Clinton right?', '>>{justanidiotloser} : Like most of what he says, it\'s a lot more nuanced than how his reddit supporters and haters portray it. [linkie](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2-7g8VNK68) It\'s 8:45 . And I understand a lot of people are mad at what they see as a betrayal of the party. Well, what they *probably* don\'t see is that most of America\'s registered voters seem to hold a lot of contempt for what they see as a broken system that only serves the top 1% of the country. He\'s always said "I can\'t tell people how to vote". And he knows he can\'t. All he can hope to do is show the DNC (because they fall closer to his personal views than the GOP). I feel like this is more of a list of what so far (at least) 47% of Primary voters are going to need before they sign on to the DNC. Me, I\'m keeping my little D because it\'s mine and I like it, dammit. But I\'m also joining the WolfPac, so I\'m going to try to get involved at a more local level.', ">>{a57782} : Fine, you're not mad, but you're still blaming them, when by your logic you should be blaming your fellow Sanders supporters.", ">>{BAHatesToFly} : > But his priority is going after people he feels wronged him? It's not his priority. It's one of his many priorities. He's allowed to have more than one priority. I don't understand why you think that him speaking out against the DNC leadership suddenly means that he's abandoned any of the things that he's been talking about for a year. He's been 'moving his agenda' and demanding a presence at the Convention for fucking months. You people chastised him for *that*, saying 'why should we listen to the loser?' Now you're chastising him for *not* explicitly harping on getting a presence at the Convention, when he's already achieved it? Jesus, what mental pretzels you bend yourself into. You're *really* reaching on something to attack him on."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{BlueDuster} : Bernie Sanders: "I know emotions are running high but we have to come together and support Secretary Clinton. She has won the nomination process by getting the most votes and I back her fully to prevent a Trump presidency and call on all my supporters to do the same."', ">>{rdf-} : Kasich didn't endorse, Ted Cruz didn't endorse. Why are you endorsing, Mr. Sanders? It makes you look weak.", ">>{GuruOfGravity} : Bernie. Thanks and I agree, it wasn't about you it was the ideas and policies and no we don't want to give those ideas up, and no we don't think Hillary will bother with anything but more of the bad.", ">>{SLDM206} : I'm tired of voting for the lesser of two evils, Bern.", ">>{WeJustOrderedBisque} : This is actual leadership, contrary to what people on here might think. Torpedoing your policy goals and ensuring what you view as the worst possible outcome because you were treated unfairly isn't. Sanders has spent his entire life fighting for progressive policy that helps everybody. He's continuing to do so.", '>>{92Lean} : No! She is part of the problem. She is a long ways from a solution.', ">>{soccerman95} : I don't believe a single word of this. Especially after the email leak. He isn't the same fighter he was 3 months ago. WHAT DID DNC/CLINTON DO TO YOU BERNIE??", '>>{Ovedya2011} : Are Bernie supporters that loyal, or that stupid, that they would throw in with a crook who stands for everything Bernie opposes?', '>>{OrganicEarlGrey} : Because he feels differently about Hillary than Kasich/Cruz feel about Trump? This is a very bizarre false equivalency', '>>{Deadeyebyby} : Rather a weasel than the two rats. Also would you prefer he dropkick them? Because I think I would.', '>>{georgiapeanuts} : No we will not acquiesce. I respect you Bernie like fam, but you do you and we will do we.', '>>{WeJustOrderedBisque} : Oh, a Donald Trump supporter will disavow Bernie? What will he do?', ">>{yugtahtmi} : Less weak and more selfless, pretty typical of him. Sticking to his word and all that considering he said at the beginning of the process that he would back her if he lost to prevent a Trump victory. Same reason he won't run as a 3rd party", '>>{intravenus_de_milo} : You could say "supporters" I\'d say shill account from /r/the_donald.', '>>{ORA_ORA_ORA_ORA} : They cloned him and stuffed the real Bernie in the closet of one of the two post offices he renamed.', '>>{SLDM206} : Who? Cause that could be both HRC and Drumpf. Also, there are other candidates out there. People complain about the US being a two party shit show yet are terrified to vote independent/green', ">>{yugtahtmi} : You act as if Trump is some savior of Democracy. He's as much a part of the problem as every establishment politician.", '>>{Slapbox} : Yep. Not anywhere on the internet. Reported.', ">>{nba2k16CRASH} : Nope. We know what we would get with a Clinton presidency. Trump might even turn out to be a decent president. I aint gonna vote for him, but you're not fear mongering me into voting for Clinton.", ">>{a__technicality} : I think that says a lot about the two choices doesn't it?", ">>{SixVISix} : Supporting the antithesis of your platform while evidence that the candidate you're now supporting manufactured your loss isn't selfless. It's suspect.", '>>{SixVISix} : Please explain what "true strength" means for those of us who don\'t understand.', '>>{dn00} : New user OP. Quote seems made up too. Falsify the Record.', '>>{Tasteslikebluemilk} : Unless the final wikileak shows she didnt get the most votes...'], [">>{beer_30} : We don't need USA Today to figure that one out.", '>>{throwaw4yyyyy} : Drumpftards will be shitting themselves as everyone credible begins to go for the only choice this election, Hillary Rodham Clinton. 1000 years of Democratic rule is at hand!', '>>{pengins4life} : Well, some of us do but Trump supporters only trust the media when its on "their side".', '>>{redditzendave} : >By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump. Wow, coming from Fox Lite USA Today, interesting, this may actually reverse global warming as hell freezes over.', ">>{StonerMeditation} : I'm voting for Clinton because she'll be a great president, but I was a Bernie supporter before. I’m proud to be voting for Hillary. And I want Trump to be trounced at the polls - I want Trump's 'message' discredited, his racist hate speech diminished, and to show that America still has a heart. I'm not in a swing state.", '>>{JordanFromSales} : There is so much hate towards donald trump, being spun and reinforced by the MSM who benefit greatly from a Clinton presidency. It really makes me sad. I follow the Money when I vote not a newspaper. "The fascists of the future will call themselves anti-fascists" - Churchill', '>>{darksiderising} : [Since you like following the money, you must be demanding Trump to release his tax returns so that you can do so.](https://media.giphy.com/media/3oz8xWYAWRpJfcNbYQ/giphy.gif)', ">>{Risley} : Then be sure to check out how Trump's own fucking charity [isn't properly licensed to accept donations](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-foundation-lacks-the-certification-required-for-charities-that-solicit-money/2016/09/29/7dac6a68-8658-11e6-ac72-a29979381495_story.html). Fucking amateur hour, and you think this idiot can run the country. Don't worry, we got you. Well make sure hes humiliated on election day and save you from him.", ">>{waste-of-skin} : CTR is too busy adding mud to the waters here to vote in online polls. At least they claim they're busy, I think they're just lazy", ">>{NateGrey} : > waste-of-skin: CTR is too busy adding mud to the waters here to vote in online polls. At least they claim they're busy, I think they're just lazy Any proof?", '>>{waste-of-skin} : Why would I provide proof for a comment I posted in the wrong thread?', '>>{thehalfwit} : 3,500 years. We are obviously witnessing the birth of a God Emperor.', ">>{BenitoPerezGaldos} : Here's a link to the actual editorial. Idk why we are reading a news article about the editorial instead of just the actual article... http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/09/29/dont-vote-for-donald-trump-editorial-board-editorials-debates/91295020/", '>>{chimthegrim} : Yea, me too. I need someone in an appropriate position to tell me what to like or who to vote for.', ">>{BatCountry9} : It's important that Trump loses badly (bigly!) His coalition of nativists and uneducated shitheads cannot be seen as a viable election vehicle for the next populist demagogue who comes along.", ">>{BedWedOrBehead} : You're wasting your vote, she's never going to win!1!", '>>{Hashslingingslashar} : Please by all means rack up the score!!'], ['>>{target_locked} : I have switched my default search engine to duck duck go and I suggest others do the same.', '>>{the_schlonger} : #Fuck Google. And fuck any other company that supports NAFTA, TPP, open borders, H1B visas, and the whole host of other bullshit that neo-conservatives and neo-liberals are using to undermine the middle class in America and drive jobs and money overseas instead of keeping it here at home.', '>>{Ctrshill547} : Hey guys (((Google))) is not biased, Trumpkins should stop complaining .', ">>{target_locked} : I don't have a problem with H1B's in some fields they are absolutely necessary in order to keep us at the cutting edge of every field possible. I would suggest changing H1B's to a minimum salary of 100,000 dollars, or in the case of an American worker being displaced, a 30,000 dollar tax per year for each H1B. Remove financial incentives and H1B's will go back to actually being used as intended.", '>>{majikmyk} : Why the hell does Google even have an opinion on this? Would the TPP even affect them?', ">>{ini0n} : The problem is they literally could run their servers off orphan blood and we'd still use it. No reason for them to be pro-consumer.", ">>{empanadacat} : The juxtaposition of stories like this and Google's manipulation of autocomplete results makes me feel like the whole world is a conspiracy.", '>>{DigitalDoggi} : We get censored by other countries, Google gets to exist globally. Yay!!! TPP !!!', ">>{the_schlonger} : That sounds reasonable, but unfortunately that's not what Hillary Clinton/Google/Facebook/Etc want. They want Hillary to expand the program so they can use H1B visas to import cheap tech workers to undercut Americans on salary and drive down employment costs for the tech giants that donate heavily to the DNC.", '>>{macredsmile} : Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. How about the 28 pages. The world is run by evil people.', '>>{target_locked} : That is entirely correct. Thus I do not in any way support Clinton or her cronies.', ">>{escalation} : I agree. Requirement for a minimum salary that exceeds the industry/company average for the position. If they're good enough to justify bringing them over a US citizen, then they'd better be good enough to pay them for their responsibilities. Upshot would be we'd still get the best talent, but we wouldn't have companies undercutting labor costs by bringing in half competent workers for less money. Country keeps its competitive edge by pillaging the best of foreign talent, without flooding the market and pushing out shoddy products.", ">>{CAPSLOCK44} : Yup, and yet somehow everybody believes everything everyone says about Trump despite him existing in the public eye all his life, being friends with Al Sharpton and Dennis Rodman, letting veterans use his private airplane to go home early from their tour when the government wouldn't do it, and even getting personally involved to stop a mugging on the streets of NYC. Obviously he's an evil racist Hitler wannabe who is going to ruin the country, I'm sure that has nothing to do with the entire mediasphere and tech industry being completely against him because he doesn't take their money.", '>>{supertopbop22} : Now we know why Google is backing Hillary. Both Google and Hillary support the TPP that will gut the middle class while both Bernie and Trump oppose the TPP.', ">>{nfineon} : So it appears they've gone full evil, looks like they are no longer on our side", '>>{IVIaskerade} : Google is not biased. (((they are)))', ">>{devilwearspantsuits} : I work for one of the tech giants now. They have been cutting regular employees in place of more overseas temps (it's a remote position). I can already see this happening tenfold with TPP. It's despicable and it's almost undoubtedly going to be passed.", '>>{trump_rises} : Yup, sneak this in on a Friday night for maximum ability to shove it under the rug.', '>>{nunudodo} : Tfw ...? Better Google that shit cause it saved you three fucking words. Edit: three fucking words ...Tfw', '>>{jsmooth7} : If it makes you feel any better, the autocomplete manipulation story turned out to not be true.', '>>{Annihilicious} : Weird. The tech giants want to make money?', '>>{PixelBlock} : The robber barons just wanted to be financially comfortable too. So did the owners of company towns. Why stop them?', '>>{PixelBlock} : Off a cliff, maybe. One step forward, one hundred floors down.', '>>{DocGonzo13} : Guess we can guess how they will act in regards to Net Neutrality', '>>{SirCabbage} : Whatever happened to "Don\'t be Evil" google? What ever happened to that.', '>>{empanadacat} : You mean Google denied it. Hardly the same thing as "it\'s not true."', '>>{jsmooth7} : Google didn\'t just deny it. They provided an explanation that makes perfectly good sense. The autocomplete algorithm is designed to avoid suggesting disparaging results about people. Try searching "trump crim" in google and bing and see what they suggest. Only bing will suggest "trump crimes". Also the video used both bing and yahoo search as a comparison, however yahoo search *uses* bing to power it. So that is highly misleading.', '>>{the_schlonger} : Tech giants already make a ridiculous amount of money. Companies like Google and Facebook are literally some of the most profitable companies on Earth. The issue is that there is no level of profit/growth that is ever "good enough" for the market, so they will always try to shed jobs and outsource rather than continuing at a sustainable profitability level that employs as many people as possible.', '>>{the_schlonger} : For what? Toeing the line of the blood-sucking 1% wall street fat cats?', ">>{the_schlonger} : TPP and un-fair trade is a big part of why I'm willing to switch from Bernie to Trump. I strongly dislike a lot of what Trump says, but I'm willing to put up with it if it means electing someone who will preserve the middle class and stop increasing income inequality by allowing American companies to replace middle class jobs with foreign workers.", ">>{oblivioustoobvious} : He's painted evil by the public incorrectly and correctly.", ">>{lilrabbitfoofoo} : I remember Trump over the past 30 years. He's always been a narcissistic nut, a charlatan and snake-oil salesman trading on his father's money and name. Nothing more.", '>>{empanadacat} : This is horseshit. It autocompletes "Lyin\' Ted" and "Jeb is a mess"', '>>{jsmooth7} : So what? It also autocompletes "hillary cr" to "hillary crooked" and "hillary f" to "hillary fbi"', ">>{kniteli} : So did Bayer, United fruit co, the Pinkertons. Making money does not mean you're right.", ">>{L_Cranston_Shadow} : And why shouldn't they? They have literally no reason to give up money on the table based on some sense of loyalty. At least in the near term they don't have to worry about people not affording their product, and there is a rising middle class in several countries that are becoming able to use Google and these other companies' products and services."], ['>>{BugFix} : Seriously, what\'s in the guy\'s head right now? "Gee, I have a meeting scheduled with Clinton in a few hours. I know! I should call a news conference and start throwing bombs at the DNC ahead of that. Surely this will improve my negotiating position." Just watch folks: he doesn\'t give a shit about Trump. He\'ll continue with the bomb-throwing all the way through and past the convention. At some point he\'s just going to end up looking like a joke.', ">>{TheBernFather} : Sour grapes from bitter old man. I'd say better luck next time but we all know he's going to drop dead at any moment.", ">>{TerryYockey} : Sorry if it sounds like a silly question, but isn't the DC primary today? I can find nothing on any news network aside from the tragedy in Orlando.", '>>{Veniabiit} : I have an exclusive preview of the DNC answering that request. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CraFZDtvreo', '>>{TerryYockey} : >Surely this will improve my negotiating position "and surely this will get super delegates to support me".', '>>{adamant2009} : It is. Results are expected around 8pm EST.', ">>{bearsandgiants} : you fail to realize that it's Clinton who needs Bernie, not the other way around.", ">>{stevebeyten} : Uhh considering she beat him by 3.5M votes and her lead on trump is growing while trump keeps lobbing bombs at himself, I'd suggest her need of him is shrinking.", ">>{BugFix} : With Mr. Best Words on the opposite side of the ballot? It doesn't seem likely. If Sanders wants a deal, he needs to cut it right now before Clinton pulls ahead by 12+ and stops picking up the phone.", '>>{AngerMacFadden} : CLinton has already shown she needs all the help.she can get, so I agree.', '>>{AngerMacFadden} : CLinton has already shown she needs all the help.she can get, so I agree.', '>>{ward0630} : If I were a Sanders supporter, my concern would be that Sanders is letting his clout go sour. If he really decides to keep going to the convention, then why should Hillary negotiate with him instead of appealing directly to his supporters? I mean, what is he going to do?', '>>{bullshit_inspector_} : Okay Bernie, we will get right on that. Just let us finish appointing Hillary first.', '>>{AngerMacFadden} : I agree, her biggest strength is still all of the people rushing to prop her up.', ">>{TheTaoOfBill} : I don't know if you noticed but Trump is collapsing. And Hillary hasn't even gotten her post nomination bump yet. Bernie lost. He needs Hillary to be on board more than Hillary needs Bernie to be on board. If Bernie wants to keep lobbing bombs at the DNC that's fine. But he's not going to get anything from the DNC.", '>>{BugFix} : The polls say otherwise. And blackmail makes a very poor negotiating position when it\'s toothless. You\'ll never vote for Clinton anyway, so your vote doesn\'t matter. She\'ll can win it with a left-leaning progressive landslide or a centrist coalition. And Sanders is picking "centrist" right now.', ">>{Tasty_Yams} : So, nothing about universal healthcare, college debt, wages, wall street reform? All those rallies and volunteer hours and all the money -- is going to go to his petty, personal vendetta against Debbie Wasserman Shultz? That's what this was all about?", ">>{Tasty_Yams} : So, nothing about universal healthcare, student debt, wages, wall street reform? All those rallies and volunteer hours and all the money -- is going to go to his petty, personal vendetta against Debbie Wasserman Shultz? That's what this was all about?", '>>{HBombthrow} : And you need us if you want any of the policies you say you care about to actually be implemented in this country', '>>{thatpj} : *Yeah because Hillary and her supporters have treated Sanders supporters with so much respect this election season....*', ">>{TheTaoOfBill} : With how terrible Trump is doing I'll take those odds. No one is going to risk voting for Sanders if there is a possibility of Trump winning. Bernie himself already said he wouldn't run 3rd party anyway. And as his supporters won't shut up about... he's a man of his word.", '>>{BugFix} : By the convention it will be too late even to play spoiler as an "independent". Again, if he wants to cut a deal, he needs to cut it now. His options for affecting national policy as a presidential candidate are fast running out.', '>>{ward0630} : I get why you might feel that Hillary has disrespected you, but appealing to the similarities between herself and Sanders while highlighting the differences between herself and Trump is a compelling argument.', ">>{noatccount} : Does anyone support DWS, even Clinton folks? She's done a shit job with the democratic party, losing state houses, governorships, the senate and has generally been a dividing figure.", ">>{RayWhelans} : Well as a Sanders supporter and now (presumably) a Clinton supporter, I still think this is the right move. DWS sucks at her job. She's an awful communicator. She showed favoritism towards another candidate, and she doesn't have Sanders' supporters faith. This is how politics work. There are consequences for doing a bad job, and I don't think it's extreme to suggest changes to the primary process (hopefully that also means the abolition of caucuses) and ousting DWS. And Sanders request non-withstanding, I still think it was entirely possible DWS was getting the boot regardless so that she could be the sacrificial lamb for party unity. And it's not like Sanders is the first to complain. [Obama was apparently very ready to oust her in 2012.](http://www.businessinsider.com/report-tensions-between-obama-and-debbie-wasserman-schultz-2014-9) It's time for her to go. Let's find someone that knows how to communicate and knows how to make all Americans feel welcome.", ">>{BAHatesToFly} : > So, nothing about universal healthcare, student debt, wages, wall street reform? You mean the things that have been the cornerstones of literally every stump speech, TV appearance, debate, rally, and campaign email he's given in the last year?", ">>{TheTaoOfBill} : Too bad he isn't going to run 3rd party. He's already said that. He refuses to let Trump win over Hillary. So I'm not even sure why you're suggesting that's on the table. It's not. Bernie has zero leverage to make demands unless he promises to stop attacking the DNC. If he can't make that promise then there is no deal to make.", ">>{BAHatesToFly} : > Just watch folks: he doesn't give a shit about Trump. He outright called Trump a racist when Hillary was refusing to. He's been mentioning how awful Donald Trump is in his rally speeches for *months* now. But by all means, continue speculating in a very specific way in order to denigrate him.", ">>{kalimashookdeday} : > And as his supporters won't shut up about And as the opposition won't shut up about telling him to bow out...", ">>{BAHatesToFly} : > Uhh considering she beat him by 3.5M votes She beat him by that margin amongst mainly Democrats. The Democratic Primary results don't have much to do with the GE because everyone gets to vote in the GE. Funny that Hillary supporters want to ignore polling (that includes likely voters of any/no party) that shows Sanders beating Trump by larger margins that Hillary because they're 'too far away' from the GE to be predictors, but *do* want to include results from closed primaries in March.", '>>{northbud} : I think he may be giving a public peek at his position on the meeting.', '>>{Neverpleasedawoman} : The fact the hillbots have been on-board with her getting booted means it will do nothing.', ">>{poultrypunisher} : Because of DC's superdelegates (26), Hillary won the primary before we even voted (only 20 pledged delegates).", '>>{TerryYockey} : If he had a legitimate shot at running third-party and winning, he would have done that from the start, rather than run as a Democrat.', '>>{BugFix} : By demanding something Clinton can\'t concede? No. He\'s throwing shoes into the gearworks just to be an asshole. The position he\'s signaling is "concede **this** you bitch!".', '>>{other_suns} : So could Joe Biden, or Elizabeth Warren. Any liberal third party candidate is president Trump.', ">>{other_suns} : If they were concerned with being called violent psychopaths they probably shouldn't have harassed people with violent death threats.", ">>{TerryYockey} : Further, isn't most of DC's population black, who tend to overwhelmingly be Clinton supporters?", ">>{thatpj} : Not really. It's nothing that hasn't already been said in the past.", ">>{RayWhelans} : I wouldn't mind Martin O'Malley as a replacement. He's looking for work, he's charismatic and a good communicator, and he seemed to not be too fond of the DNC or their ways during the debates. How do we feel about O'Malley taking the job?", ">>{Tasty_Yams} : Yeah. Those. Exactly. What happened to those? I thought that's what he cared about. Now this is about revenge?", ">>{a57782} : It is kind of adorable how there seem to be Sanders supporters who seem almost offended that some Clinton supporters aren't fond of them. Like people are still going to like them after months of being called shills, corrupt or low-information. What do you know, they don't like being treated the way they've been treating other people.", ">>{TheTaoOfBill} : I care about every one of those issues. Which is why I voted for Hillary. Her positions on those issues were well thought out and addressed the political realities. Sander's positions on those issues were unrealistic overly optimistic both in political support and in numbers, and risked discrediting the entire movement which his over ambitious promises and overly expensive solutions.", '>>{travis-} : Debbie is on MSNBC right now and said she will refuse to step down.', ">>{youdidntreddit} : No, she's done a shit job. Then again I am no Hillary partisan, just think she's smarter than Bernie.", ">>{golikehellmachine} : I'm a pretty solid Clinton supporter, but there'll be no love lost if DWS hits the road at the DNC. Her performance there has been pretty abysmal. That said, I think Sanders is walking a pretty fine line here; as a participant in the process, I *do* think he has some valid points to make about how the party goes about the nominating process. However, I want the DNC to, first and foremost, represent Democrats. Sanders' proposed reforms tilt significantly towards independents and unaffiliated candidates.", ">>{golikehellmachine} : I don't know enough about O'Malley's organizing skills; one of the Dean's biggest strengths (one of the better chairs in recent history) was his ability to organize at the local, state, regional and national level. Now, he wasn't the greatest of all time or anything, but he was pretty damn effective in the role, and he had demonstrated all of those skills during his tenure as governor and during his presidential run. Does O'Malley have the same kind of skill set?", ">>{golikehellmachine} : I don't think Frank would be able to figure out how to run candidates in conservative districts all that well. He definitely knows how to compromise, but he's not particularly good at masking his contempt - something that the DNC chair is going to have to do in purple and reddish districts - in order to get a foothold at the state level. I say this as a Barney Frank superfan.", ">>{Tasty_Yams} : He doesn't like Frank either. He's among the dozens of liberals in this country that don't pass the Sanders purity test. Maybe he can get Cornell West.", ">>{BAHatesToFly} : It's not either/or. He's capable of caring about all of those things, like he's been doing for a year, and *also* caring about removing current DNC leadership. Just because he gives one speech doesn't mean that he's forgotten any of the things that he's been *hammering* on for a year. Jesus. You people will dig and dig for even a scrap to try and fight him on.", '>>{Tasty_Yams} : Wow, look at all that free speech down at the bottom of this post.', ">>{Tasty_Yams} : Then why spend your political capital on petty revenge? I can get behind universal health care and lowering student debt. But his priority is going after people he feels wronged him? For fucks sake, use this as an opportunity to move your agenda! Not for salty retribution. It makes me think that what they say is true: He's drank his own kool aid.", ">>{other_suns} : Probably easier to say he's not among the dozens of liberals that do pass the purity test.", '>>{kingdowngoat} : All he needs to do is win the presidency and he can do that. Only one problem...', ">>{WhySettle4Less} : True, but removing one of that [Hydra's heads](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lernaean_Hydra) is a good start.", ">>{a57782} : Then you shouldn't be getting mad at people when people call you violent psychopaths because that's the fault of some Sanders supporters.", ">>{WhySettle4Less} : Hillbots are hoping that the elimination of one of Hillary's [hatchet (wo)men](http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hatchet%20man) will deflect attention from her role in the Democratic primary rigging and provide her with plausible deniability. It won't. It's an old stunt weasels in leadership ranks routinely pull.", ">>{justanidiotloser} : Nope. But that's what you're going to hear. If there's a link to the full video anywhere it's worth a watch if you're actually curious.", '>>{Esteway} : Not necessarily but if she is replaced it should be because the party decides it is for the best, not because sore loser Bernie is trying to settle scores for perceived slights.', ">>{Tasty_Yams} : I'm sorry but I just don't understand this. There are literally millions of Clinton supporters like me who can get behind what Sanders stands for - even if we didn't think he was the best candidate. I WANT HIM TO PUSH THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY TO THE LEFT. But fuck him if he's going to squander this opportunity by exacting revenge on the DNC.", '>>{a57782} : > Run third party, then the cackle and her supporters can collectively shit their pants and whine about the lost election. And then you guys will get to shit your pants and whine when a conservative supreme court stymies your revolution and begins to undo even more progress, but hey at least you guys got to stick it to Hillary Clinton right?', '>>{justanidiotloser} : Like most of what he says, it\'s a lot more nuanced than how his reddit supporters and haters portray it. [linkie](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2-7g8VNK68) It\'s 8:45 . And I understand a lot of people are mad at what they see as a betrayal of the party. Well, what they *probably* don\'t see is that most of America\'s registered voters seem to hold a lot of contempt for what they see as a broken system that only serves the top 1% of the country. He\'s always said "I can\'t tell people how to vote". And he knows he can\'t. All he can hope to do is show the DNC (because they fall closer to his personal views than the GOP). I feel like this is more of a list of what so far (at least) 47% of Primary voters are going to need before they sign on to the DNC. Me, I\'m keeping my little D because it\'s mine and I like it, dammit. But I\'m also joining the WolfPac, so I\'m going to try to get involved at a more local level.', ">>{a57782} : Fine, you're not mad, but you're still blaming them, when by your logic you should be blaming your fellow Sanders supporters.", ">>{BAHatesToFly} : > But his priority is going after people he feels wronged him? It's not his priority. It's one of his many priorities. He's allowed to have more than one priority. I don't understand why you think that him speaking out against the DNC leadership suddenly means that he's abandoned any of the things that he's been talking about for a year. He's been 'moving his agenda' and demanding a presence at the Convention for fucking months. You people chastised him for *that*, saying 'why should we listen to the loser?' Now you're chastising him for *not* explicitly harping on getting a presence at the Convention, when he's already achieved it? Jesus, what mental pretzels you bend yourself into. You're *really* reaching on something to attack him on."], ['>>{BillTowne} : Apparently the Speaker has veto on who can speak and the current speaker, who is a conservative politician from our closest ally, thinks that the current President of the US is unfit to appear in the Parliament. >**Bercow\'s speech was met with a round of applause** from MPs in the Commons, which in usual circumstances is banned practice. Veteran Labour MP Dennis Skinner stood up to say "well done" to the House speaker. >Opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn tweeted shortly after the speech: "Well said John Bercow. We must stand up for our country\'s values. Trump\'s State Visit should not go ahead." >Corbyn\'s Labour colleague Harriet Harman tweeted saying it was **a "proud moment" for the House of Commons**. In a statement, Liberal Democrat party leader leader Tim Farron said: "Trump should be under no illusion. **We are snubbing him.**"', '>>{team-fyi} : Angry phone call to England coming in 3....2....1....', ">>{the_ewok_slayer} : >It is customary for visiting Presidents to address MPs and Lords in Westminster Hall when making state visits to the UK. No, it isn't. Obama is the only US president to have done that in Westminster Hall.", '>>{QuestionTheNWO} : Remember when republicans claimed Obama had lowered the standing of the USA in the eyes of foreign leaders.', ">>{team-fyi} : Unless someone dials the phone for him; you're probably right.", '>>{team-fyi} : The Apprentice had better ratings than Sherlock.', ">>{pudgyfuck} : Please, I've seen WAY bigger things than Ben, I can promise you. Sad!", '>>{cofman} : You forgot the main one. "Fake News"', ">>{ITGuy_higgins} : Well, we're probably going to have to call Barack back to actually make that 'apology tour' the right was accusing him of doing for years after this...", '>>{all2humanuk} : Woah! Trump\'s not going to like this. What about his freedom of speech? "Westminster is a college right Steve? we can cut their funding?"', '>>{Ginkgopsida} : Is it not common to have lively discussions in the Parliament? Could have been interesting. On the other hand, we can look forward to Trumps hatefull tweets.', '>>{oneeasypod} : looks like his "exclusive" trade deal with England is about to hit brick wall. What are the great trade deals that are supposed to pay for this wall again? Where is the economic boom that will pay for these tax cuts?', '>>{brave_new_whirl} : Overrated failing piece of garbage parliament! SAD! /s', '>>{kbounce24} : How long until Trump says it was his decision not to go?', '>>{grammaticalfailure} : They should ban Theresa May from speaking in Parliament.', ">>{aManPerson} : that's a shame. i would have loved for those rowdy folk to berate him and treat him like the slag he is.", '>>{the_ewok_slayer} : They addressed parliament in the Royal Gallery, not Westminster Hall.', '>>{the_ewok_slayer} : Reagan and Clinton addressed parliament in the Royal Gallery, not Westminster Hall.', ">>{Sieggi858} : You're arguing semantics, who cares WHERE it was done?", '>>{the_ewok_slayer} : It may not make a difference to Americans, but addressing Parliament in Westminster Hall is a rare honour afforded to very few foreign leaders. It is somewhat newsworthy that Trump is not going to be addressing Parliament. It is not at all newsworthy that it isn\'t going to be in Westminster Hall, because no one in their right mind would expect him to be given that privilege (I was surprised when Obama was, to be honest). At any rate, my comment was 100% factual. I didn\'t say Obama was the only one to address Parliament, I said he was the only one to address Parliament "in Westminster Hall." The article is wrong in saying that US presidents do that customarily.', ">>{KeyboardChap} : For comparison [here's the speech Mr Bercow made to welcome Obama when he spoke to Parliament.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fj9kG7zKx_o)", ">>{MisanthropicAtheist} : Donald Trump isn't fit to appear on an episode of Jerry Springer.", '>>{Chuck419} : On a side note, British people sounded more "American" prior to 1776 and through most of modern history. It\'s only in the past 100-150 years they started talking with goofy accents. https://www.google.com/amp/amp.livescience.com/33652-americans-brits-accents.html?client=safari', '>>{Longgrassmcgraw} : At this point, what country can he go to where he will be warmly welcomed?', '>>{knashoj} : This is a already a strong contender as the best burn of 2017 (emphasis is mine): > In the past we have hosted speeches from leaders in equality, justice and human rights from Mandela to Obama to Aung San Suu Kyi. **Trump is not fit to shine their shoes.** It\'s a brilliant use of the old racist "shoe-shining" trope.', ">>{DumpsterDon} : lol. The US's best ally tells Trump to fuck off. How did we get here?", ">>{DumpsterDon} : Preach it. It would be like a visiting UK PM addressing Congress in Independence hall. Not an exact analogy, but one meant to demonstrate how rare it is. edit: here's a list of those that have addressed both Houses of the United Kingdom Parliament in Westminster Hall since 1939: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_who_have_addressed_both_Houses_of_the_United_Kingdom_Parliament 21 June 2012 Aung San Suu Kyi Burmese Opposition Leader Westminster Hall 25 May 2011 Barack Obama President of the United States Westminster Hall 20 March 2012 Elizabeth II Queen of the United Kingdom Westminster Hall 17 September 2010 Benedict XVI Pope (state visit) Westminster Hall 11 July 1996 Nelson Mandela President of South Africa Westminster Hall 6 May 1995 Elizabeth II Queen of the United Kingdom Westminster Hall 7 April 1960 Charles de Gaulle President of France Westminster Hall 26 October 1950 George VI King of the United Kingdom Westminster Hall 23 March 1939 Albert Lebrun President of France Westminster Hall Dumpster will never be on that list.", ">>{hotcaulk} : I'm so sorry England. King George III was a dick but we promise we'll behave this time!", '>>{Sean_Spicer_WH} : Yeah?! Well, *PARLIAMENT* is banned from speaking in the White House! What do you think about *THAT*, fake news parliament?!', '>>{kevinnetter} : before the imposition of the migrant ban I would myself have been strongly opposed to an address by President Trump in Westminster Hall. After the imposition of the migrant ban by President Trump I am even more strongly opposed to an address by President Trump in Westminster Hall.', ">>{mycroft2000} : Foreigner here. I had literally *never* heard of anyone describing Obama as anything less than eloquent and dignified until I learned from Reddit that there are Republicans who act as you describe. He never embarrassed America; but *they* sure do. I can't even bear to watch Trump speak. It makes my skin crawl.", '>>{arthurpaliden} : Clinton, Obama, the President of China and even the President of Mexico have addressed Parliament.']]

classify and reply

['>>{Whoshabooboo} : Bernie Sanders supporters push to make sure he gets a roll-call vote', '>>{SATexas1} : A theatrical roll call vote where he turns over his delegates is ridiculous pie. Keep it', '>>{OhSixTJ} : Anyone else wish there were notification "theme" settings? Like "office" and it\'ll silence certain notifications while allowing others? And a "home" to allow all?', '>>{bobybushia} : It means nothing. They are just trying to sooth Sanders supporters by making them feel like their votes matter.', ">>{Hackett_Out_} : > At least he is going down fighting What? He bent the knee so fast I'm sure his kneecap is broken", ">>{esteban-was-eaten} : We now have a better idea who's behind 'unmasking' Trump officials' contact with foreign agents — and why", ">>{shimakaze_kun} : I wish I could change the infernal twitter notification sound. I hate that sound so much I entirely disabled twitter's abilityto make sound while popping notifications.", '>>{shrike71} : Before people\'s head\'s explode, this relevant clip from the article: > National-security experts say Rice\'s reported requests to identify who was speaking with the foreign officials before Trump was inaugurated were neither unusual nor against the law — especially if, as Lake reported, the foreign officials being monitored were discussing "valuable political information" that required the identity of the people they were speaking to, or about, to be uncovered.', '>>{osaucyone} : Yeah, this is the piece that every right winger posting this today are conveniently ignoring.', '>>{maejsh} : Been missing this ever since the old Nokias where you could set it up how you liked it.', '>>{OhSixTJ} : Mine makes the standard "tri-tone" sound when I receive a notification. What sound are you talking about and when does it make it? Speaking of: I\'ve never heard the "tweet" sound that\'s on the phone even though my "tweet" sound setting is set to the "tweet" sound.', ">>{Shugbug1986} : They'll try and just end up pissing more of them off.", ">>{OhSixTJ} : You'd think it'd be a no-brained for a company like Apple.", '>>{still_lost} : >Pillar, who is now a non-resident senior fellow at Georgetown University\'s Center for Security Studies, said Rice may have even been motivated to request identities in order to constrain her own communications. >"If Ms. Rice was communicating with members of Trump\'s team regarding transition matters, and she learns from intelligence that some such members also are communicating with the Russians, she would want to know exactly who is doing that so she can be extra careful in her own talks, lest something she says gets relayed to Moscow," Pillar said. Wow.', '>>{DrPoopEsq} : Well, this article highlights a lot more of the information about how Rice was likely just doing her job, that any unmasking that took place was likely legal, and part of an ongoing investigation.', ">>{Huckleberry_Win} : Long story short: The law was followed to a T and there wasn't even anything unusual about such a request being made.", '>>{shimakaze_kun} : Yeah, it\'s the tri-tone sound, after hearing it enough times it makes me so annoyed and I want the option to change it to something else. > I\'ve never heard the "tweet" sound that\'s on the phone even though my "tweet" sound setting is set to the "tweet" sound. Same!', ">>{OhSixTJ} : I'm with you on that. Maybe we'll get the option in iOS 16.", '>>{Heywood_Floyd} : Agreed. I\'m also still waiting for ringtone profiles so I don\'t have to continually go into settings and manually set "vibrate on Silent" any time I walk into a bookstore or a similar situation. My blackberry from 10 some years ago had this. I can\'t believe this feature never made it to iOS.', '>>{the_moon_is_down} : were you just not paying attention the last year while he kept running against her despite mathematical improbability? he only gave in when he knew it was either, back her, or let trump win', '>>{still_lost} : Yeah, I thought this was a really good piece.', '>>{veridique} : The question still remains, why were they playing footsie with the Russians? Edit: Spelling', '>>{MR-DUMP} : He isn\'t "going down fighting". He bent the knee to Hillary and turned his back on his grassroots supporters. If you consider what he\'s doing to be "going down fighting", then you\'re definition is pathetic.', ">>{osaucyone} : Makes sense why Spicer was avoiding all questions about Rice in the presser today, it was all legal which means that Trump and Co we're doing something illegal.", '>>{OhSixTJ} : Seems like that should be one of those quick access options from the control center that could be placed next to a much smaller night shift button.', ">>{public_land_owner} : I'm really enjoying the quality writing during the Trumpocalypse.", '>>{nba2k16CRASH} : Bernie has bent the knee further then Cruz who is still standing in all his sliminess.', ">>{whatsmyPW} : Its funny. Assuming the story is true and Rice did in fact legally have the names unmasked, then all of these right-wingers spreading story around is essentially passing along more evidence against Trump's administration.", '>>{deebaggus} : *"The intelligence reports Rice obtained "were summaries of monitored conversations — primarily between foreign officials discussing the Trump transition, but also in some cases direct contact between members of the Trump team and monitored foreign officials," Bloomberg\'s Eli Lake reported on Monday."* that is the first I have heard of Trumps Team speaking directly with monitored foreign officials. LOL, that the Trumpsters are promoting a story that now ties Trump Team directly to foreign influence. OOPS!', ">>{nba2k16CRASH} : his goals wont be accomplished if hillary is elected. full stop. hillary is the face of the establishment bernie railed against. 4-8 years of hillary is 4-8 years of the poor and middle class being ripped off and fucked, 4-8 years of illegal immigrants being fucked over, 4-8 years of minorities being exploited and fucked over, 4-8 years of warmongering drone bombing in the middleast fucking over the children of other nations, and 4-8 years of lies and corruption. we've had enough, and we don't care if Bernie has sold us out because he's afraid. we're not afraid of trump. we're DONE with this corrupt oligarchy, we KNOW what hillary is. if trump gets elected: SO BE IT. And btw hillary will be a disaster for gun rights so dont think that her supreme court picks are better for us then trump's.", '>>{Huckleberry_Win} : Yep, real journalists are doing great work. Unfortunately we gotta sift through 30 pounds of shit everyday to get to the goods.', ">>{_tx} : It's not like it changes anything, but it would be nice for the delegates who paid their own money to vote for their man (or woman) instead of the affirmation vote.", ">>{johnmal85} : It's the confidence in outcomes that leads to surprises.", ">>{slick_licks_dicks} : I just wish I could schedule DnD for multiple time periods. I like to have it on when I sleep and when I'm at work, but I can't make both of those automatic.", '>>{wytxcook} : > "We\'re all Democrats and we need to act like it." Rep. Marcia Fudge (D-Ohio), leading convention proceedings. Nice tone to start out the convention there Dems.', '>>{still_lost} : WALK IT BACK, WALK IT BACK!! - Spicer, probably', '>>{OhSixTJ} : Location based notification settings would be amazing. Using a wifi network to activate/deactivate would also be awesome.', '>>{back9} : you know what you lefties are ignoring? the freaking leaks', ">>{slakmehl} : So the Trump admin is going to try cast Susan Rice as racist shithead Mark Fuhrman in a blame-the-cops OJ defense. It's a bold move, Cotton, let's see if it pays off.", ">>{Overly_Triggered} : This is almost as exciting as the NeverTrump crowd. It's weird seeing so many people angry at Sanders for sticking to his word.", '>>{nextbgates95} : The "Tweet" sound is the sound that plays when you send a tweet through the built-in iOS sharing functionality.', ">>{antyher0} : The straws that Trump supporters are frantically grasping at seem fewer and flimsier each day which tells me everything's about to fall apart for them.", '>>{OhSixTJ} : Probably sound dumb asking this but what sharing part? The menu that pops up when you touch the square with the up arrow?', ">>{InfamousBLT} : > feel like their votes matter. Our votes do matter, because there is 0 chance of Hillary winning the general election if we don't vote for her. If every Bernie supporter stays home, Trump will absolutely crush Hillary. So maybe they don't matter at the convention, but the longer this insane disrespect of Bernie by the Hillary camp continues, the less likely any Bernie supporter is going to come out and vote for her in November, and the less likely she is to win. So sure, keep telling us our votes don't matter, and we'll gladly show you in November that they do by staying home.", ">>{sox_n_sandals} : Yeah for real. My dad used to be the Metro Editor for a paper where I live. I think that a lot of the paper journalist moved to TV journalism and unfortunately had to dumb down or shorten the amount of information they were providing. After that mass migration it's been hard to find thorough investigative stories anywhere.", '>>{leontes} : rice requesting this is proper if voices are showing up in investigations. If you have a problem with this: it\'s like saying "unfair" when a referee is exploring a possible cheating scandal by asking for names of a members of a team because of evidence against them.', ">>{nextbgates95} : Yep that's the one. I think it might be called the Share (or Sharing) Card but that may be Android terminology.", ">>{OhSixTJ} : Just tried sharing this post and a screenshot of it and no sound. ¯\\_(ツ)_/¯ I'll try different things though to see if I can find something that makes it haha", ">>{TopographicOceans} : I'd just love an option in the calendar app that would go to DND mode for certain appointments.", ">>{nextbgates95} : Interesting. I just tried mine and it also didn't make the sound. I know it used to, but not sure when it stopped doing so.", '>>{BGCMDIT} : Imagine your house is on fire. Trump is standing outside with a can of gasoline and a box of matches. You can hear the firetruck coming down the street. The first question you want to ask is "Who called the fire department?"', ">>{steelersfan4eva} : I've been saying this for years. Should work with location services as well. It knows where I work and live...", '>>{justaguy394} : Android has "if this then that" (ITTT)... So wish iOS did too :(', '>>{MWM2} : The keyword when talking to a rabid right-winger always seems to be "context". They always seem to *forget* all about it.', '>>{LeDocteurNo} : Please stop, I can only be so moist.', ">>{helodriver87} : We're very much paying attention to the leaks. They're symptomatic of the shutting down of normal channels by an administration that doesn't want their criminal dealings exposed. What I find amusing is the GOPs fascination with stopping the leaks at all costs rather than addressing the information coming from them.", '>>{woodtick57} : i love this part.... "Trump on Monday praised Fox\'s "amazing reporting on unmasking and the crooked scheme against us," which he said showed that "there was electronic surveillance" of his inner circle during the transition." does he mean the \'so-called "judge" \' that got fired because his stories on this issue were patently false?!?! that "amazing reporting"? you just can\'t make up shit as funny as Trump making a fool of himself with his ignorance...', '>>{CynCity323} : > My blackberry from 10 some years ago had this. I can\'t believe this feature never made it to iOS. that is the one thing that almost made me not get an iPhone... been waiting for it since.... and that was the 3g..... here we are, 8 models later and still no damn "profiles"', '>>{osaucyone} : You all seemed cool with it when Wikileaks was leaking info. Now that people in the government are leaking info to protect our country, it is suddenly a big issue to stop them. Tony Hawk level flipping.', '>>{dynamitejim} : JFC. And the Right is trying to push this as vindicating Trump? This just makes him look even worse.', '>>{WhyMnemosyne} : That number one leaker Nunes did a fine job, who did he leave out?', '>>{moronictransgression} : I agree it would be nice to have a single option to click - but you CAN do this if you want. Go to "Settings -> Do Not Disturb". From here, you can tell it you don\'t want to be bothered, but you can add exceptions. For example, you can accept all calls from your contacts, or allow a certain group (e.g. "Friends and Family" if you\'re at home, "All Clients" if you\'re at work, etc.). I do the opposite of what everyone is suggesting! I open up my list to "everyone" when I\'m at work because I don\'t know if I\'m going to get calls from clients, vendors, or else. But when I get home, those people go directly to voice mail, with the exception of a few employees who are on my "emergency list". So at home, I limit who I\'m willing to accept calls from (of course, they all go to voice mail so I have the option to listening to their plight and responding if I care to), but at work, I open it up to the entire public. Anyway - look into the "Do Not Disturb" settings - there are some cool options there, though not exactly what you\'re asking for.', '>>{AltLogin202} : Yep, this was my first thought when I read the thread title. I believe this feature was called "profiles".', ">>{PoppinKREAM} : Problem is that cognitive dissonance knows no bounds to many of these right-wing, republican ideologues. They will not see this as evidence, on the contrary - they'll defend Trump vehemently.", ">>{Ozymandias12} : The only thing this report tells us is that Devin Nunes lied to the media, his colleagues, and the country. The White House leaked this information to him as a distraction and he went along with it willingly. Now let's all get back to the real story here which is that Trump officials were talking with foreign agents being monitored by the intel community.", ">>{still_lost} : I think they're having second thoughts using this as their new distraction, given that Spicer didn't want to talk about Rice during his briefing today.", '>>{artwooo} : There is one misleading clue in iCal: "show as busy / free" If I\'m busy, I don\'t want to be distracted', '>>{WhyMnemosyne} : And the chief leaker so far is Devin Nunes.', '>>{Robert_T_Pooner} : Yeah, this is how fucked they are. Best case for them is apparently "Yeah Trump\'s top people were, like, in *constant* contact with persons or organizations that were subject to lawful FISA-approved surveillance."', '>>{downvoterealitykidzs} : The unmasking needs to be investigated to verify it was done properly without political or other nefarious motivation and the names unmasked were not improperly spread throughout the intelligence community after the request was granted. An administration improperly collecting, revealing, and/or disseminating information on political opposition is a serious issue that anyone with a shred of intellectual honesty would expect be investigated instead of just taking the word of an article like this that everything was done legitimately. I have little doubt we will find none of that here on r/politics though.', ">>{WhyMnemosyne} : Oops, Trump is claiming those recorded colluding with the Russians are his inner circle. We don't need theonion.com with the Trump Adm.", '>>{melon_thief} : After scolding the media for not focusing on who did the unmasking, he was curiously silent on every question related to Rice today', '>>{still_lost} : Have you really found anyone disagreeing with the veracity of your statement?', '>>{place_holder_} : All I want is three volume profiles, ringer, vibrate, silent. Not ringer or vibrate+silent. This is one of my biggest annoyances with iOS.', ">>{OhSixTJ} : I can't jailbreak because company MDM doesn't allow it.", ">>{OhSixTJ} : Haha in all honesty, yes. I wouldn't mind one at all and would've gone with one if my company would allow them.", '>>{4esop} : They are attacking and chipping at whatever parts of the investigation they can. The hope is to 1) Distract from the actual issues and 2) Reveal anything about how deep the investigation goes or how much they know (so they can plot their defense).', '>>{maturebozo} : This. I was last weekend thinking about this setup. Forgot completely that you can create Groups. You do need to do it in the OSX Contacts or in iCloud to create them: https://www.tekrevue.com/tip/mac-contacts-smart-groups/', ">>{4esop} : So that's how we get them to spread real news. Give it a provocative right-wing headline, and maybe start the first paragraph sounding like you are towing the party line. Then follow with the facts.", '>>{Shr3kk_Wpg} : I see no problem in looking into why the unmasking was done and if it was all legal and followed the proper rules.', ">>{Fat_Ass_Reddit} : Couldn't you just set no alert for those appointments?", ">>{1TipsyCoachman} : And they weren't discussing the weather or something innocuous. Stone cold collusion and treason, all day long.", ">>{CToxin} : I don't care who shot the sheriff, I want to know who told the deputy!", ">>{snailshoe} : Agreed, once you've tried it the default app is just horrible.", '>>{duckduck_goose} : Man this needs to be on every news media outlet asap', ">>{bhaller} : Agreed, can't wait to find out WHY this was done LEGALLY.", '>>{RcNorth} : Give Apple some feedback [here](http://apple.com/feedback)', ">>{Oakwine} : There's an app called AutoMute, I'm not sure how it got through the Apple review system. It allows you to set the volume (including mute) based on location. Unfortunately it can't set vibration levels. I've used it for years. https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/auto-mute-by-location/id650303758?mt=8", '>>{hopesdead} : I wish you could enable text tones when using a Apple Watch.', ">>{robstak} : it's a total lay-up for us if trump-shitheads attack with this info. win win.", '>>{Casual_Bitch_Face} : Trump and his team are doing everything in their power to obstruct this investigation. It is now abundantly obvious that his administration is selectively "leaking" info to the press to divert attention away from the real story. Where is the outrage about these leakers? So far, the biggest outrage from the republicans is the fact that we know about the investigation. This is unreal.', ">>{justaguy394} : Thanks, I wasn't aware. I had previously heard that iOS didn't allow some permissions like android would so it wasn't available. Wonder if that changed or if the iOS version is just less powerful (or maybe I was misinformed all along).", ">>{JoePesciOfGoneFishin} : This seems to be what was hinted in reports a few weeks ago that Obama's team was asking a lot of clarifying questions in security briefings to get Trumps collusion with Russia marked in the record and thus harder for Trump to bury. I don't know why the right is celebrating this, it looks pretty darn bad for Trump", ">>{Torger083} : I think you're missing what they're asking for. They want to have the phone automatically DND while in those appointments.", '>>{Fat_Ass_Reddit} : Got it. Yeah, DND would be better if the settings were more customizable.', '>>{MyNameIsRay} : They don\'t understand there is a legal way to do what was done. They focus on the claim that Obama ordered an illegal wire tap, and each bit of info is just more "proof" that the claim is valid.', ">>{saltlets} : > The unmasking needs to be investigated to verify it was done properly without political or other nefarious motivation and the names unmasked were not improperly spread throughout the intelligence community after the request was granted. Yes, this is what the Intelligence Committees in Congress exist for. White House has been asked for 2 weeks now to send their information to the committees and so far they've only shown it to Nunes and (as of Friday) Schiff, who said he saw nothing out of the ordinary and asked that it be sent to both the House and Senate committees for review.", ">>{billthomson} : They don't care about reality- they believe they make reality.", ">>{JohnBigBootey} : Yeah, you're right,it's nowhere near as powerful. It's handy for feeding data to other apps, but it can't change any system settings.", '>>{Offf_My_Meds} : Nah bro, this type of tech is for Android.', '>>{masinmancy} : > Unfortunately we gotta sift through 30 pounds of shit everyday I consider it a workout for building memory muscle at calling out lies & bullshit', '>>{saltlets} : She was asked if she knew what Devin Nunes was talking about, and she said she has no idea what Devin Nunes is talking about. If Devin Nunes had said "Susan Rice unmasked names", and she said "I did not", she\'d be lying. Do you think the former National Security Advisor should talk to reporters about classified intelligence reports that reveal sources and methods because Congressional Ninja Nunes rambled vaguely about something inappropriate? Especially when there was nothing inappropriate about what Rice was doing?', ">>{Tempest228} : Yeah, this is what I don't get. This story does more damage then vindicates Trump. Rice has the legal ground to request those unmask in the case of them talking about sensitive political information. What they mistakenly are confirming is Trump team spoke with monitored forien officials about very sensitive topics if Rice had the legal ground to request unmasks. The coverup is always more sloppy than the crime.", ">>{bassististist} : I would bet a thousand dollars there's a pro-Wikileaks comment in your history.", '>>{TitanKS} : You know what you right-winger\'s and Trump supporters are ignoring? "Freaking:" *The realization that the President or President Elect collaborating with a hostile foreign government is a much bigger issue than leaks, and if the dossier and other sources are true, it\'s treason bro. *That Russia does not have our best interests in mind. *That Republicans do not have your best interests in mind. *That a failed businessman with corrupt practices, a 7th grade reading/speaking level, a propensity for violence, rape, corruption, nepotism, racism, xenophobia, hate, and just straight up basic stupidity does not make a recipe for a good president. *Critical thinking skills. *General common sense. *Manners. *Empathy. *Sexual satisfaction (just a guess on this one, but the signs are there - and GOP Consultant Rick Wilson did call Trump supporters "[Childless single men who masturbate to anime](http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/01/20/gop-consultant-rick-wilson-to-msnbc-trump-supporters-childless-single-men-who-masturbate-to-anime/)." - I even linked to a Breitbart article to make sure you stayed in your snowflake safe space.', '>>{bassististist} : (Wikileaks releases hacked RNC materials.) OMG, I FUCKING HATE WIKILEAKS!', ">>{albanydigital} : YES! I get notifications from my Ring Doorbell and Schlage Lock when there is activity. But I don't need to know that there is activity when I'm home, or when the kids are in and out 15 times in an hour.", '>>{ytown} : Just waiting for Fox News to demand that Rice get called to the SSIC. Yes please. Let her testify as to what she saw that had her worried enough to unmask.', '>>{Eraticwanderer} : And if this was directed at the orders of the President, there is a strong case for obstruction of justice.', ">>{Amator} : On iOS it's referred to as the [Share Sheet](http://www.imore.com/sharing-ios-8-explained) and was added in iOS 8.", ">>{bassististist} : > Yeah, this is what I don't get. This story does more damage then vindicates Trump. Ummm...they're morons. There's nothing more to get about tRump and team than this. They flail and they fail, as his approval rating circles the drain and the FBI keeps tying all the threads together.", '>>{bassististist} : They tend to shout first and then think "why the fuck did we do that?" second.', '>>{bassististist} : It feels like something big is coming with this desperate flailing about. Perhaps from NBC.', ">>{fizzlebuns} : So we not going to talk about this part: >Documents showing that Rice made those requests were uncovered by the National Security Council's senior director for intelligence, Ezra Cohen-Watnick, according to Lake's reporting. Cohen-Watnick was involved in providing documents related to the incidental surveillance of members of Trump's transition team to House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes about two weeks ago, though it is unclear if they are the same documents mentioned in Lake's reporting. Because that shit is very suspect.", '>>{back9} : Nice try. How about criminalizing diplomacy. Funny how we haven\'t heard much from Adam "we have more than circumstantial, uh wait, we don\'t definitive proof" Schiff. I really hope the transcripts of these calls come out.', ">>{Shenanigans99} : I wonder if it's a patent thing. It seems like such an obvious thing for iPhone and Android to have dropped the ball on it for so long, unless maybe they just legally can't do it.", ">>{OhSixTJ} : I have it but didn't really enjoy it. I'll try it again.", '>>{EnigmaVIII} : Nope. The question was whether she knew anything about Trump being swept up in incidental surveillance, to which she said ["I know nothing about this"](https://youtu.be/sH0akjRDJsY) (first question in video). I\'ll ask again, if she was not doing something inappropriate then why lie? I think what is most disturbing is that incidental surveillance of American citizens where unmasked and then disseminated by political rivals. You can say the surveillance was incidental, you can argue the unmasking was done properly, but disseminating the surveillance throughout the US government as well as to foreign governments are both unprecedented. Not to mention leaks to MSM to run a smear campaign.', ">>{bassististist} : > I have little doubt we will find none of that here on r/politics though. All I've seen on here is a full debunking of this story. The NSA has the right to act as they did, and do you really want to be TRUMPeting that your team was under investigation for illicit collusion yet again? Notice how Spicey dropped all of this like a hot potato at the press conference today...", '>>{laresek} : This is where I don\'t get Trump. Going on about "unmasking" and "surveillance" conspiracy theories can easily be countered by with "You\'re right, Donald, let\'s get to the bottom of this. We need to find out WHO in your administration was unmasked and *WHY*. Let\'s put an independent commission on this!" Call his bluff and watch him back down. By drawing attention to this, he\'s drawing more attention to himself and his cronies.', ">>{Eraticwanderer} : I got robbed when I was trying to sell heroin. Why aren't you looking for them!", ">>{back9} : Hey man you're appropriating our lingo seriously, if I wanted a 'safe space', would I be here talking to you loons? Especially with those devastating shots at the end", ">>{ifyoupaiditisntfree} : It's not diplomacy before you are sworn in, it's illegal.", '>>{MSACCESS4EVA} : > If Devin Nunes had said "Susan Rice unmasked names", and she said "I did not", she\'d be lying. ...and she *still* wouldn\'t be lying. She only *requested* they be unmasked. She did not do the unmasking herself.', ">>{OhSixTJ} : I was actually thinking of this a few days ago. Guess I'll have to give it a better look.", '>>{pal002} : I recently had a late model blackberry and this was baked into the calendar app it was very useful.', ">>{ifyoupaiditisntfree} : How would anyone here know what you would or wouldn't do? It clearly isn't based on fact, reality, intelligence or logic. You support the dumbest, most incompetent, most corrupt, worst president ever. Who knows what other stupidity you get up to.", '>>{DrunkenGenie} : The identities of US persons may be released under two circumstances: 1) the identity is needed to make sense of the intercept; **2) if a crime is involved in the conversation**,', '>>{hufnagel0} : Right, seems like this is standard operating procedure in certain circumstances. >"The identities of US persons may be released under two circumstances: 1) the identity is needed to make sense of the intercept; **2) if a crime is involved in the conversation,"** said Robert Deitz, a former senior counselor to the CIA director and former general counsel at the National Security Agency. Hmmm... that\'s interesting. >"Any senior official who receives the underlying intelligence may request these identities," Deitz said, noting that while **"the bar for obtaining the identity is not particularly high, it must come from a senior official, and the reason cannot simply be raw curiosity."**', '>>{Eraticwanderer} : Names were unmasked as part of this investigation. That alone is enough to be considered legal and legit. The mere fact there are three active (two if you count out the HIC) means there is evidence to show it was done properly.', ">>{joelberg} : Maybe Trump wasn't the person she unmasked. In that case she was still honest. Plus in the video you provided you dont hear the question she was asked. We were just told what the question was.", ">>{back9} : that's a pretty huge stretch, dude. When BHO went to Europe during '08 campaign he had zero contact with foreign emissaries? please", '>>{OhSixTJ} : Wait a minute, $9.99??? For twitter!!', '>>{pegothejerk} : Guess the FBI is investigating for no particular reason, then.', '>>{imaginethehangover} : Yep, those were the good ol days. When you could change your friend\'s "silent" theme to maximum volume on his Nokia and call him at strategic times during his presentation. Ahh, simpler times. Edit: I don\'t grammar well', '>>{back9} : Geez, the FBI doesn\'t have any history of politically motivated investigations does it I don\'t get. Backpedaling Schiff says we\'re "at the early stage" and Comey, your demon-turned-hero, said it goes back to July. Which is it? BTW does Hillary bear ANY responsibility for losing?', '>>{RickTitus} : Thats how a satire article trash talking trump got reposted by the White House.', ">>{Keerected_Recordz} : Aye, there's the rub, now that we know that Team Trump was surveilled, incidentally, as early as 2015.", '>>{ShaunBH} : And while acting as an unregistered foreign actor for Turkey.', ">>{Moath} : As dumb this comments will sound, when I first bought my iPhone I really missed my Nokia's profiles.", '>>{maejsh} : Haha aye! Used to have the change language commands memorized so I could changed friends quick without them being able to stop me muahaa!', '>>{KenNakajima} : This was one of the reasons I went with a Nokia n95 instead of an iPhone back when the iPhone first came out. That and I wanted to stay on T-Mobile and enjoyed my $6 a month EDGE data since I was in college and had wifi almost everywhere I went. I loved the ringer profiles so much.', '>>{imaginethehangover} : You bast! (I like your style).', ">>{M3nDuKoi} : No ads, sometimes it's 50% off. It's a good investment.", '>>{ShaunBH} : Huh. "Stone" and "treason" in the same sentence again. Weird. /s', '>>{Keerected_Recordz} : Just days ago, this sub rejected the notion that surveillance of Trump was a reality. Congrats on the awakening.', '>>{majnus} : I remember not picking up first iPhones for that exact reason too. No profiles? Good luck.', ">>{ShaunBH} : It seems there are many legal circumstances Rice could unmask. Alternatively, I can imagine few or no legal scenarios involving constant communication between Russian operatives and a presidential campaign--especially in the context of Crimea, sanctions, etc. So if all of these campaign and transition members' meetings with Russian oligarchs, spies, and diplomats was purely coincidental, let's get it out there and make this all go away.", ">>{gewgwegweegw} : No, I don't want themes. I want to trust Apple to get it right, ergonomically and aesthetically. The whole point of using Apple stuff is that you don't get bamboozled by 1000 different config options.", ">>{OhSixTJ} : Do you also leave your vehicle the way they come off the dealers lot? Because I don't.", ">>{geoken} : The average users has night shift on a schedule and has likely never pressed that button and possibly never will. So unfortunately there's no choice but to have that button occupy the space of 4 normal, frequently used buttons.", ">>{geoken} : The exceptions would be usefull if they could be app based (did an feedback suggestion for that). I'm on call so I need my work email to wake me up, but that means I can't put my phone in DND mode so all night my phone is at max volume with notifications tunred on (unless I manually go through and start silencing every other app 1 by 1 every day).", '>>{downnheavy} : Thought so to until the "do not disturb" option came, and it\'s perfect!, you can actually control who will be silenced and who\'s not', '>>{ShaunBH} : I\'m missing the whole "smear campaign" aspect. Is there some contention that this info was used against his campaign and he would have won by even more EC votes if it hadn\'t happened (a la the 3 - 5 million "illegals" who voted somewhere)?', ">>{timetide} : Considering how trump was bashing NBC on twitter I assume it's a given they have a strike against him", '>>{abhinavk} : In Android, Do Not Disturb can be scheduled for calendar events or multiple timeslots. I really miss it on iOS.', ">>{PM_ME_PIC_OF_BOOBS} : Good idea, I didn't know I wanted this until now.", ">>{Nickbou} : This is for so others can view your calendar availability without seeing your actual scheduled items. It's essential for business uses. You can create a meeting and see other people's availability (busy or available) to determine the best time when everyone can meet. People may have things scheduled in their calendar but are actually available to meet at that time. It wouldn't be practical to use this flag for a DND function (at least not on its own).", ">>{sonnuvabitch} : They weren't surveilling Trump. They were doing what they always did surveilling Russia and every other foreign nation ambassasdors which every member of the intelligence community knows including the moron Flynn. Flynn should have known his conversation with Kislyak was being recorded, but the moron still talked to him.", ">>{f-bastiat} : Strangely, I miss that blinking red light when I had a new email. Man, blackberry's were awesome. Sent from my iPhone.", '>>{Keerected_Recordz} : Iirc, General Flynn is a democrat, twice promoted by the Obama Administration. What did he say in 2016 that prompted widescale collection in 2015? Makes you think about facts?', ">>{sonnuvabitch} : > Iirc, General Flynn is a democrat, twice promoted by the Obama Administration. Bears zero relevance. > What did he say in 2016 that prompted widescale collection in 2015? Where does it shows he was being unmasked in 2015? As far as every knows and all the facts bear it he was being unmasked for talking to the Russian ambassador. The question you should be asking is why is he communicating so much with Russians? > Makes you think about facts? No idea wtf you're talking about.", '>>{whitereader} : I don\'t think so. My Lineage 14.1 has a "System Profiles" menu in the settings. Triggers are WiFi, Bluetooth and NFC (I can also manually trigger them), and it can switch the status of GPS, WiFi, Notification sounds, volume, ambient display and almost everything else. Shouldn\'t be that hard to automate that with Tasker using geofences and stuff. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S5', ">>{Keerected_Recordz} : TIL 'unmasking requests' directed at associates of the President date back to before Trump received the nomination of his party. Having fun with media dissonance.", '>>{geekbot} : They moved the blinking red dot to the Apple Watch!', '>>{endoplasmatisch} : Windows Phone has this Feature since the introduction of Cortana.', ">>{Tyrannosaurus-WRX} : I think I just found an app that will nearly do that. It has no reviews and was just released and isnt free, so I haven't actually tested it AutoSilence by Niv Gutherz https://appsto.re/us/UPoRhb.i", '>>{Keerected_Recordz} : a) Phone calls with Russian Officials, may or may not be a serious crime; agreed? b) Felonious release of classified information is a crime, agreed? To date we have proof of a) and b)! Let us observe the ensuing investigation with open eyes.', ">>{TopographicOceans} : I tried the full auto silent app. It requires GPS even if you don't do anything with location based silencing, and it drains your battery instantly. Trashed it.", '>>{geeky_username} : All they care about is the headline > BREAKING: Former Federal Bureau of Investigation Associate Director Mark Felt was Deep Throat. Leaked classified Nixon docs!', '>>{geeky_username} : Mike Cernovich: *"I\'ve got it! It was Susan Rice! She wanted to know who was talking to Russian Agents!"* Spicer: *"DUDE! SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!"*', '>>{geeky_username} : Or maybe *just maybe* if there\'s some **National Security knowledge** that the former **National Security Adviser** knows - they don\'t blab about it to a PBS News interview? *"Well Anderson Cooper, I normally wouldn\'t divulge secret info about possible ongoing investigations...but since you asked..."*', '>>{geeky_username} : > By drawing attention to this, he\'s drawing more attention to himself and his cronies. It seemed like the WH/Spicer has stayed quiet on this, but the right-wing media machine are the ones who picked this up. Spicer is probably screaming *"SHUT THE FUCK UP ALREADY"*', '>>{geeky_username} : They probably called to asked for comment on a soon-to-be-published story.', '>>{halfmanmonkey} : Surprised it took so long for you to do the Hillary Pivot(TM). Good for you for showing such restraint. Also, you should read up on the Logan Act. Colluding with foreign officials to win an election is illegal.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{esteban-was-eaten} : We now have a better idea who's behind 'unmasking' Trump officials' contact with foreign agents — and why", '>>{shrike71} : Before people\'s head\'s explode, this relevant clip from the article: > National-security experts say Rice\'s reported requests to identify who was speaking with the foreign officials before Trump was inaugurated were neither unusual nor against the law — especially if, as Lake reported, the foreign officials being monitored were discussing "valuable political information" that required the identity of the people they were speaking to, or about, to be uncovered.', '>>{osaucyone} : Yeah, this is the piece that every right winger posting this today are conveniently ignoring.', '>>{still_lost} : >Pillar, who is now a non-resident senior fellow at Georgetown University\'s Center for Security Studies, said Rice may have even been motivated to request identities in order to constrain her own communications. >"If Ms. Rice was communicating with members of Trump\'s team regarding transition matters, and she learns from intelligence that some such members also are communicating with the Russians, she would want to know exactly who is doing that so she can be extra careful in her own talks, lest something she says gets relayed to Moscow," Pillar said. Wow.', '>>{DrPoopEsq} : Well, this article highlights a lot more of the information about how Rice was likely just doing her job, that any unmasking that took place was likely legal, and part of an ongoing investigation.', ">>{Huckleberry_Win} : Long story short: The law was followed to a T and there wasn't even anything unusual about such a request being made.", '>>{still_lost} : Yeah, I thought this was a really good piece.', '>>{veridique} : The question still remains, why were they playing footsie with the Russians? Edit: Spelling', ">>{osaucyone} : Makes sense why Spicer was avoiding all questions about Rice in the presser today, it was all legal which means that Trump and Co we're doing something illegal.", ">>{public_land_owner} : I'm really enjoying the quality writing during the Trumpocalypse.", ">>{whatsmyPW} : Its funny. Assuming the story is true and Rice did in fact legally have the names unmasked, then all of these right-wingers spreading story around is essentially passing along more evidence against Trump's administration.", '>>{deebaggus} : *"The intelligence reports Rice obtained "were summaries of monitored conversations — primarily between foreign officials discussing the Trump transition, but also in some cases direct contact between members of the Trump team and monitored foreign officials," Bloomberg\'s Eli Lake reported on Monday."* that is the first I have heard of Trumps Team speaking directly with monitored foreign officials. LOL, that the Trumpsters are promoting a story that now ties Trump Team directly to foreign influence. OOPS!', '>>{Huckleberry_Win} : Yep, real journalists are doing great work. Unfortunately we gotta sift through 30 pounds of shit everyday to get to the goods.', '>>{still_lost} : WALK IT BACK, WALK IT BACK!! - Spicer, probably', '>>{back9} : you know what you lefties are ignoring? the freaking leaks', ">>{slakmehl} : So the Trump admin is going to try cast Susan Rice as racist shithead Mark Fuhrman in a blame-the-cops OJ defense. It's a bold move, Cotton, let's see if it pays off.", ">>{antyher0} : The straws that Trump supporters are frantically grasping at seem fewer and flimsier each day which tells me everything's about to fall apart for them.", ">>{sox_n_sandals} : Yeah for real. My dad used to be the Metro Editor for a paper where I live. I think that a lot of the paper journalist moved to TV journalism and unfortunately had to dumb down or shorten the amount of information they were providing. After that mass migration it's been hard to find thorough investigative stories anywhere.", '>>{leontes} : rice requesting this is proper if voices are showing up in investigations. If you have a problem with this: it\'s like saying "unfair" when a referee is exploring a possible cheating scandal by asking for names of a members of a team because of evidence against them.', '>>{BGCMDIT} : Imagine your house is on fire. Trump is standing outside with a can of gasoline and a box of matches. You can hear the firetruck coming down the street. The first question you want to ask is "Who called the fire department?"', '>>{MWM2} : The keyword when talking to a rabid right-winger always seems to be "context". They always seem to *forget* all about it.', ">>{helodriver87} : We're very much paying attention to the leaks. They're symptomatic of the shutting down of normal channels by an administration that doesn't want their criminal dealings exposed. What I find amusing is the GOPs fascination with stopping the leaks at all costs rather than addressing the information coming from them.", '>>{woodtick57} : i love this part.... "Trump on Monday praised Fox\'s "amazing reporting on unmasking and the crooked scheme against us," which he said showed that "there was electronic surveillance" of his inner circle during the transition." does he mean the \'so-called "judge" \' that got fired because his stories on this issue were patently false?!?! that "amazing reporting"? you just can\'t make up shit as funny as Trump making a fool of himself with his ignorance...', '>>{osaucyone} : You all seemed cool with it when Wikileaks was leaking info. Now that people in the government are leaking info to protect our country, it is suddenly a big issue to stop them. Tony Hawk level flipping.', '>>{dynamitejim} : JFC. And the Right is trying to push this as vindicating Trump? This just makes him look even worse.', '>>{WhyMnemosyne} : That number one leaker Nunes did a fine job, who did he leave out?', ">>{PoppinKREAM} : Problem is that cognitive dissonance knows no bounds to many of these right-wing, republican ideologues. They will not see this as evidence, on the contrary - they'll defend Trump vehemently.", ">>{Ozymandias12} : The only thing this report tells us is that Devin Nunes lied to the media, his colleagues, and the country. The White House leaked this information to him as a distraction and he went along with it willingly. Now let's all get back to the real story here which is that Trump officials were talking with foreign agents being monitored by the intel community.", ">>{still_lost} : I think they're having second thoughts using this as their new distraction, given that Spicer didn't want to talk about Rice during his briefing today.", '>>{WhyMnemosyne} : And the chief leaker so far is Devin Nunes.', '>>{Robert_T_Pooner} : Yeah, this is how fucked they are. Best case for them is apparently "Yeah Trump\'s top people were, like, in *constant* contact with persons or organizations that were subject to lawful FISA-approved surveillance."', '>>{downvoterealitykidzs} : The unmasking needs to be investigated to verify it was done properly without political or other nefarious motivation and the names unmasked were not improperly spread throughout the intelligence community after the request was granted. An administration improperly collecting, revealing, and/or disseminating information on political opposition is a serious issue that anyone with a shred of intellectual honesty would expect be investigated instead of just taking the word of an article like this that everything was done legitimately. I have little doubt we will find none of that here on r/politics though.', ">>{WhyMnemosyne} : Oops, Trump is claiming those recorded colluding with the Russians are his inner circle. We don't need theonion.com with the Trump Adm.", '>>{melon_thief} : After scolding the media for not focusing on who did the unmasking, he was curiously silent on every question related to Rice today', '>>{still_lost} : Have you really found anyone disagreeing with the veracity of your statement?', '>>{4esop} : They are attacking and chipping at whatever parts of the investigation they can. The hope is to 1) Distract from the actual issues and 2) Reveal anything about how deep the investigation goes or how much they know (so they can plot their defense).', ">>{4esop} : So that's how we get them to spread real news. Give it a provocative right-wing headline, and maybe start the first paragraph sounding like you are towing the party line. Then follow with the facts.", '>>{Shr3kk_Wpg} : I see no problem in looking into why the unmasking was done and if it was all legal and followed the proper rules.', ">>{1TipsyCoachman} : And they weren't discussing the weather or something innocuous. Stone cold collusion and treason, all day long.", ">>{CToxin} : I don't care who shot the sheriff, I want to know who told the deputy!", '>>{duckduck_goose} : Man this needs to be on every news media outlet asap', ">>{bhaller} : Agreed, can't wait to find out WHY this was done LEGALLY.", ">>{robstak} : it's a total lay-up for us if trump-shitheads attack with this info. win win.", '>>{Casual_Bitch_Face} : Trump and his team are doing everything in their power to obstruct this investigation. It is now abundantly obvious that his administration is selectively "leaking" info to the press to divert attention away from the real story. Where is the outrage about these leakers? So far, the biggest outrage from the republicans is the fact that we know about the investigation. This is unreal.', ">>{JoePesciOfGoneFishin} : This seems to be what was hinted in reports a few weeks ago that Obama's team was asking a lot of clarifying questions in security briefings to get Trumps collusion with Russia marked in the record and thus harder for Trump to bury. I don't know why the right is celebrating this, it looks pretty darn bad for Trump", '>>{MyNameIsRay} : They don\'t understand there is a legal way to do what was done. They focus on the claim that Obama ordered an illegal wire tap, and each bit of info is just more "proof" that the claim is valid.', ">>{saltlets} : > The unmasking needs to be investigated to verify it was done properly without political or other nefarious motivation and the names unmasked were not improperly spread throughout the intelligence community after the request was granted. Yes, this is what the Intelligence Committees in Congress exist for. White House has been asked for 2 weeks now to send their information to the committees and so far they've only shown it to Nunes and (as of Friday) Schiff, who said he saw nothing out of the ordinary and asked that it be sent to both the House and Senate committees for review.", ">>{billthomson} : They don't care about reality- they believe they make reality.", '>>{masinmancy} : > Unfortunately we gotta sift through 30 pounds of shit everyday I consider it a workout for building memory muscle at calling out lies & bullshit', '>>{saltlets} : She was asked if she knew what Devin Nunes was talking about, and she said she has no idea what Devin Nunes is talking about. If Devin Nunes had said "Susan Rice unmasked names", and she said "I did not", she\'d be lying. Do you think the former National Security Advisor should talk to reporters about classified intelligence reports that reveal sources and methods because Congressional Ninja Nunes rambled vaguely about something inappropriate? Especially when there was nothing inappropriate about what Rice was doing?', ">>{Tempest228} : Yeah, this is what I don't get. This story does more damage then vindicates Trump. Rice has the legal ground to request those unmask in the case of them talking about sensitive political information. What they mistakenly are confirming is Trump team spoke with monitored forien officials about very sensitive topics if Rice had the legal ground to request unmasks. The coverup is always more sloppy than the crime.", ">>{bassististist} : I would bet a thousand dollars there's a pro-Wikileaks comment in your history.", '>>{TitanKS} : You know what you right-winger\'s and Trump supporters are ignoring? "Freaking:" *The realization that the President or President Elect collaborating with a hostile foreign government is a much bigger issue than leaks, and if the dossier and other sources are true, it\'s treason bro. *That Russia does not have our best interests in mind. *That Republicans do not have your best interests in mind. *That a failed businessman with corrupt practices, a 7th grade reading/speaking level, a propensity for violence, rape, corruption, nepotism, racism, xenophobia, hate, and just straight up basic stupidity does not make a recipe for a good president. *Critical thinking skills. *General common sense. *Manners. *Empathy. *Sexual satisfaction (just a guess on this one, but the signs are there - and GOP Consultant Rick Wilson did call Trump supporters "[Childless single men who masturbate to anime](http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/01/20/gop-consultant-rick-wilson-to-msnbc-trump-supporters-childless-single-men-who-masturbate-to-anime/)." - I even linked to a Breitbart article to make sure you stayed in your snowflake safe space.', '>>{bassististist} : (Wikileaks releases hacked RNC materials.) OMG, I FUCKING HATE WIKILEAKS!', '>>{ytown} : Just waiting for Fox News to demand that Rice get called to the SSIC. Yes please. Let her testify as to what she saw that had her worried enough to unmask.', '>>{Eraticwanderer} : And if this was directed at the orders of the President, there is a strong case for obstruction of justice.', ">>{bassististist} : > Yeah, this is what I don't get. This story does more damage then vindicates Trump. Ummm...they're morons. There's nothing more to get about tRump and team than this. They flail and they fail, as his approval rating circles the drain and the FBI keeps tying all the threads together.", '>>{bassististist} : They tend to shout first and then think "why the fuck did we do that?" second.', '>>{bassististist} : It feels like something big is coming with this desperate flailing about. Perhaps from NBC.', ">>{fizzlebuns} : So we not going to talk about this part: >Documents showing that Rice made those requests were uncovered by the National Security Council's senior director for intelligence, Ezra Cohen-Watnick, according to Lake's reporting. Cohen-Watnick was involved in providing documents related to the incidental surveillance of members of Trump's transition team to House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes about two weeks ago, though it is unclear if they are the same documents mentioned in Lake's reporting. Because that shit is very suspect.", '>>{back9} : Nice try. How about criminalizing diplomacy. Funny how we haven\'t heard much from Adam "we have more than circumstantial, uh wait, we don\'t definitive proof" Schiff. I really hope the transcripts of these calls come out.', '>>{EnigmaVIII} : Nope. The question was whether she knew anything about Trump being swept up in incidental surveillance, to which she said ["I know nothing about this"](https://youtu.be/sH0akjRDJsY) (first question in video). I\'ll ask again, if she was not doing something inappropriate then why lie? I think what is most disturbing is that incidental surveillance of American citizens where unmasked and then disseminated by political rivals. You can say the surveillance was incidental, you can argue the unmasking was done properly, but disseminating the surveillance throughout the US government as well as to foreign governments are both unprecedented. Not to mention leaks to MSM to run a smear campaign.', ">>{bassististist} : > I have little doubt we will find none of that here on r/politics though. All I've seen on here is a full debunking of this story. The NSA has the right to act as they did, and do you really want to be TRUMPeting that your team was under investigation for illicit collusion yet again? Notice how Spicey dropped all of this like a hot potato at the press conference today...", '>>{laresek} : This is where I don\'t get Trump. Going on about "unmasking" and "surveillance" conspiracy theories can easily be countered by with "You\'re right, Donald, let\'s get to the bottom of this. We need to find out WHO in your administration was unmasked and *WHY*. Let\'s put an independent commission on this!" Call his bluff and watch him back down. By drawing attention to this, he\'s drawing more attention to himself and his cronies.', ">>{Eraticwanderer} : I got robbed when I was trying to sell heroin. Why aren't you looking for them!", ">>{back9} : Hey man you're appropriating our lingo seriously, if I wanted a 'safe space', would I be here talking to you loons? Especially with those devastating shots at the end", ">>{ifyoupaiditisntfree} : It's not diplomacy before you are sworn in, it's illegal.", '>>{MSACCESS4EVA} : > If Devin Nunes had said "Susan Rice unmasked names", and she said "I did not", she\'d be lying. ...and she *still* wouldn\'t be lying. She only *requested* they be unmasked. She did not do the unmasking herself.', ">>{ifyoupaiditisntfree} : How would anyone here know what you would or wouldn't do? It clearly isn't based on fact, reality, intelligence or logic. You support the dumbest, most incompetent, most corrupt, worst president ever. Who knows what other stupidity you get up to.", '>>{DrunkenGenie} : The identities of US persons may be released under two circumstances: 1) the identity is needed to make sense of the intercept; **2) if a crime is involved in the conversation**,', '>>{hufnagel0} : Right, seems like this is standard operating procedure in certain circumstances. >"The identities of US persons may be released under two circumstances: 1) the identity is needed to make sense of the intercept; **2) if a crime is involved in the conversation,"** said Robert Deitz, a former senior counselor to the CIA director and former general counsel at the National Security Agency. Hmmm... that\'s interesting. >"Any senior official who receives the underlying intelligence may request these identities," Deitz said, noting that while **"the bar for obtaining the identity is not particularly high, it must come from a senior official, and the reason cannot simply be raw curiosity."**', '>>{Eraticwanderer} : Names were unmasked as part of this investigation. That alone is enough to be considered legal and legit. The mere fact there are three active (two if you count out the HIC) means there is evidence to show it was done properly.', ">>{joelberg} : Maybe Trump wasn't the person she unmasked. In that case she was still honest. Plus in the video you provided you dont hear the question she was asked. We were just told what the question was.", ">>{back9} : that's a pretty huge stretch, dude. When BHO went to Europe during '08 campaign he had zero contact with foreign emissaries? please", '>>{pegothejerk} : Guess the FBI is investigating for no particular reason, then.', '>>{back9} : Geez, the FBI doesn\'t have any history of politically motivated investigations does it I don\'t get. Backpedaling Schiff says we\'re "at the early stage" and Comey, your demon-turned-hero, said it goes back to July. Which is it? BTW does Hillary bear ANY responsibility for losing?', '>>{RickTitus} : Thats how a satire article trash talking trump got reposted by the White House.', ">>{Keerected_Recordz} : Aye, there's the rub, now that we know that Team Trump was surveilled, incidentally, as early as 2015.", '>>{ShaunBH} : And while acting as an unregistered foreign actor for Turkey.', '>>{ShaunBH} : Huh. "Stone" and "treason" in the same sentence again. Weird. /s', '>>{Keerected_Recordz} : Just days ago, this sub rejected the notion that surveillance of Trump was a reality. Congrats on the awakening.', ">>{ShaunBH} : It seems there are many legal circumstances Rice could unmask. Alternatively, I can imagine few or no legal scenarios involving constant communication between Russian operatives and a presidential campaign--especially in the context of Crimea, sanctions, etc. So if all of these campaign and transition members' meetings with Russian oligarchs, spies, and diplomats was purely coincidental, let's get it out there and make this all go away.", '>>{ShaunBH} : I\'m missing the whole "smear campaign" aspect. Is there some contention that this info was used against his campaign and he would have won by even more EC votes if it hadn\'t happened (a la the 3 - 5 million "illegals" who voted somewhere)?', ">>{timetide} : Considering how trump was bashing NBC on twitter I assume it's a given they have a strike against him", ">>{sonnuvabitch} : They weren't surveilling Trump. They were doing what they always did surveilling Russia and every other foreign nation ambassasdors which every member of the intelligence community knows including the moron Flynn. Flynn should have known his conversation with Kislyak was being recorded, but the moron still talked to him.", '>>{Keerected_Recordz} : Iirc, General Flynn is a democrat, twice promoted by the Obama Administration. What did he say in 2016 that prompted widescale collection in 2015? Makes you think about facts?', ">>{sonnuvabitch} : > Iirc, General Flynn is a democrat, twice promoted by the Obama Administration. Bears zero relevance. > What did he say in 2016 that prompted widescale collection in 2015? Where does it shows he was being unmasked in 2015? As far as every knows and all the facts bear it he was being unmasked for talking to the Russian ambassador. The question you should be asking is why is he communicating so much with Russians? > Makes you think about facts? No idea wtf you're talking about.", ">>{Keerected_Recordz} : TIL 'unmasking requests' directed at associates of the President date back to before Trump received the nomination of his party. Having fun with media dissonance.", '>>{Keerected_Recordz} : a) Phone calls with Russian Officials, may or may not be a serious crime; agreed? b) Felonious release of classified information is a crime, agreed? To date we have proof of a) and b)! Let us observe the ensuing investigation with open eyes.', '>>{geeky_username} : All they care about is the headline > BREAKING: Former Federal Bureau of Investigation Associate Director Mark Felt was Deep Throat. Leaked classified Nixon docs!', '>>{geeky_username} : Mike Cernovich: *"I\'ve got it! It was Susan Rice! She wanted to know who was talking to Russian Agents!"* Spicer: *"DUDE! SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!"*', '>>{geeky_username} : Or maybe *just maybe* if there\'s some **National Security knowledge** that the former **National Security Adviser** knows - they don\'t blab about it to a PBS News interview? *"Well Anderson Cooper, I normally wouldn\'t divulge secret info about possible ongoing investigations...but since you asked..."*', '>>{geeky_username} : > By drawing attention to this, he\'s drawing more attention to himself and his cronies. It seemed like the WH/Spicer has stayed quiet on this, but the right-wing media machine are the ones who picked this up. Spicer is probably screaming *"SHUT THE FUCK UP ALREADY"*', '>>{geeky_username} : They probably called to asked for comment on a soon-to-be-published story.', '>>{halfmanmonkey} : Surprised it took so long for you to do the Hillary Pivot(TM). Good for you for showing such restraint. Also, you should read up on the Logan Act. Colluding with foreign officials to win an election is illegal.'], ['>>{Whoshabooboo} : Bernie Sanders supporters push to make sure he gets a roll-call vote', '>>{SATexas1} : A theatrical roll call vote where he turns over his delegates is ridiculous pie. Keep it', '>>{bobybushia} : It means nothing. They are just trying to sooth Sanders supporters by making them feel like their votes matter.', ">>{Hackett_Out_} : > At least he is going down fighting What? He bent the knee so fast I'm sure his kneecap is broken", ">>{Shugbug1986} : They'll try and just end up pissing more of them off.", '>>{the_moon_is_down} : were you just not paying attention the last year while he kept running against her despite mathematical improbability? he only gave in when he knew it was either, back her, or let trump win', '>>{MR-DUMP} : He isn\'t "going down fighting". He bent the knee to Hillary and turned his back on his grassroots supporters. If you consider what he\'s doing to be "going down fighting", then you\'re definition is pathetic.', '>>{nba2k16CRASH} : Bernie has bent the knee further then Cruz who is still standing in all his sliminess.', ">>{nba2k16CRASH} : his goals wont be accomplished if hillary is elected. full stop. hillary is the face of the establishment bernie railed against. 4-8 years of hillary is 4-8 years of the poor and middle class being ripped off and fucked, 4-8 years of illegal immigrants being fucked over, 4-8 years of minorities being exploited and fucked over, 4-8 years of warmongering drone bombing in the middleast fucking over the children of other nations, and 4-8 years of lies and corruption. we've had enough, and we don't care if Bernie has sold us out because he's afraid. we're not afraid of trump. we're DONE with this corrupt oligarchy, we KNOW what hillary is. if trump gets elected: SO BE IT. And btw hillary will be a disaster for gun rights so dont think that her supreme court picks are better for us then trump's.", ">>{_tx} : It's not like it changes anything, but it would be nice for the delegates who paid their own money to vote for their man (or woman) instead of the affirmation vote.", ">>{johnmal85} : It's the confidence in outcomes that leads to surprises.", '>>{wytxcook} : > "We\'re all Democrats and we need to act like it." Rep. Marcia Fudge (D-Ohio), leading convention proceedings. Nice tone to start out the convention there Dems.', ">>{Overly_Triggered} : This is almost as exciting as the NeverTrump crowd. It's weird seeing so many people angry at Sanders for sticking to his word.", ">>{InfamousBLT} : > feel like their votes matter. Our votes do matter, because there is 0 chance of Hillary winning the general election if we don't vote for her. If every Bernie supporter stays home, Trump will absolutely crush Hillary. So maybe they don't matter at the convention, but the longer this insane disrespect of Bernie by the Hillary camp continues, the less likely any Bernie supporter is going to come out and vote for her in November, and the less likely she is to win. So sure, keep telling us our votes don't matter, and we'll gladly show you in November that they do by staying home."], ['>>{OhSixTJ} : Anyone else wish there were notification "theme" settings? Like "office" and it\'ll silence certain notifications while allowing others? And a "home" to allow all?', ">>{shimakaze_kun} : I wish I could change the infernal twitter notification sound. I hate that sound so much I entirely disabled twitter's abilityto make sound while popping notifications.", '>>{maejsh} : Been missing this ever since the old Nokias where you could set it up how you liked it.', '>>{OhSixTJ} : Mine makes the standard "tri-tone" sound when I receive a notification. What sound are you talking about and when does it make it? Speaking of: I\'ve never heard the "tweet" sound that\'s on the phone even though my "tweet" sound setting is set to the "tweet" sound.', ">>{OhSixTJ} : You'd think it'd be a no-brained for a company like Apple.", '>>{shimakaze_kun} : Yeah, it\'s the tri-tone sound, after hearing it enough times it makes me so annoyed and I want the option to change it to something else. > I\'ve never heard the "tweet" sound that\'s on the phone even though my "tweet" sound setting is set to the "tweet" sound. Same!', ">>{OhSixTJ} : I'm with you on that. Maybe we'll get the option in iOS 16.", '>>{Heywood_Floyd} : Agreed. I\'m also still waiting for ringtone profiles so I don\'t have to continually go into settings and manually set "vibrate on Silent" any time I walk into a bookstore or a similar situation. My blackberry from 10 some years ago had this. I can\'t believe this feature never made it to iOS.', '>>{OhSixTJ} : Seems like that should be one of those quick access options from the control center that could be placed next to a much smaller night shift button.', ">>{slick_licks_dicks} : I just wish I could schedule DnD for multiple time periods. I like to have it on when I sleep and when I'm at work, but I can't make both of those automatic.", '>>{OhSixTJ} : Location based notification settings would be amazing. Using a wifi network to activate/deactivate would also be awesome.', '>>{nextbgates95} : The "Tweet" sound is the sound that plays when you send a tweet through the built-in iOS sharing functionality.', '>>{OhSixTJ} : Probably sound dumb asking this but what sharing part? The menu that pops up when you touch the square with the up arrow?', ">>{nextbgates95} : Yep that's the one. I think it might be called the Share (or Sharing) Card but that may be Android terminology.", ">>{OhSixTJ} : Just tried sharing this post and a screenshot of it and no sound. ¯\\_(ツ)_/¯ I'll try different things though to see if I can find something that makes it haha", ">>{TopographicOceans} : I'd just love an option in the calendar app that would go to DND mode for certain appointments.", ">>{nextbgates95} : Interesting. I just tried mine and it also didn't make the sound. I know it used to, but not sure when it stopped doing so.", ">>{steelersfan4eva} : I've been saying this for years. Should work with location services as well. It knows where I work and live...", '>>{justaguy394} : Android has "if this then that" (ITTT)... So wish iOS did too :(', '>>{LeDocteurNo} : Please stop, I can only be so moist.', '>>{CynCity323} : > My blackberry from 10 some years ago had this. I can\'t believe this feature never made it to iOS. that is the one thing that almost made me not get an iPhone... been waiting for it since.... and that was the 3g..... here we are, 8 models later and still no damn "profiles"', '>>{moronictransgression} : I agree it would be nice to have a single option to click - but you CAN do this if you want. Go to "Settings -> Do Not Disturb". From here, you can tell it you don\'t want to be bothered, but you can add exceptions. For example, you can accept all calls from your contacts, or allow a certain group (e.g. "Friends and Family" if you\'re at home, "All Clients" if you\'re at work, etc.). I do the opposite of what everyone is suggesting! I open up my list to "everyone" when I\'m at work because I don\'t know if I\'m going to get calls from clients, vendors, or else. But when I get home, those people go directly to voice mail, with the exception of a few employees who are on my "emergency list". So at home, I limit who I\'m willing to accept calls from (of course, they all go to voice mail so I have the option to listening to their plight and responding if I care to), but at work, I open it up to the entire public. Anyway - look into the "Do Not Disturb" settings - there are some cool options there, though not exactly what you\'re asking for.', '>>{AltLogin202} : Yep, this was my first thought when I read the thread title. I believe this feature was called "profiles".', '>>{artwooo} : There is one misleading clue in iCal: "show as busy / free" If I\'m busy, I don\'t want to be distracted', '>>{place_holder_} : All I want is three volume profiles, ringer, vibrate, silent. Not ringer or vibrate+silent. This is one of my biggest annoyances with iOS.', ">>{OhSixTJ} : I can't jailbreak because company MDM doesn't allow it.", ">>{OhSixTJ} : Haha in all honesty, yes. I wouldn't mind one at all and would've gone with one if my company would allow them.", '>>{maturebozo} : This. I was last weekend thinking about this setup. Forgot completely that you can create Groups. You do need to do it in the OSX Contacts or in iCloud to create them: https://www.tekrevue.com/tip/mac-contacts-smart-groups/', ">>{Fat_Ass_Reddit} : Couldn't you just set no alert for those appointments?", ">>{snailshoe} : Agreed, once you've tried it the default app is just horrible.", '>>{RcNorth} : Give Apple some feedback [here](http://apple.com/feedback)', ">>{Oakwine} : There's an app called AutoMute, I'm not sure how it got through the Apple review system. It allows you to set the volume (including mute) based on location. Unfortunately it can't set vibration levels. I've used it for years. https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/auto-mute-by-location/id650303758?mt=8", '>>{hopesdead} : I wish you could enable text tones when using a Apple Watch.', ">>{justaguy394} : Thanks, I wasn't aware. I had previously heard that iOS didn't allow some permissions like android would so it wasn't available. Wonder if that changed or if the iOS version is just less powerful (or maybe I was misinformed all along).", ">>{Torger083} : I think you're missing what they're asking for. They want to have the phone automatically DND while in those appointments.", '>>{Fat_Ass_Reddit} : Got it. Yeah, DND would be better if the settings were more customizable.', ">>{JohnBigBootey} : Yeah, you're right,it's nowhere near as powerful. It's handy for feeding data to other apps, but it can't change any system settings.", '>>{Offf_My_Meds} : Nah bro, this type of tech is for Android.', ">>{albanydigital} : YES! I get notifications from my Ring Doorbell and Schlage Lock when there is activity. But I don't need to know that there is activity when I'm home, or when the kids are in and out 15 times in an hour.", ">>{Amator} : On iOS it's referred to as the [Share Sheet](http://www.imore.com/sharing-ios-8-explained) and was added in iOS 8.", ">>{Shenanigans99} : I wonder if it's a patent thing. It seems like such an obvious thing for iPhone and Android to have dropped the ball on it for so long, unless maybe they just legally can't do it.", ">>{OhSixTJ} : I have it but didn't really enjoy it. I'll try it again.", ">>{OhSixTJ} : I was actually thinking of this a few days ago. Guess I'll have to give it a better look.", '>>{pal002} : I recently had a late model blackberry and this was baked into the calendar app it was very useful.', '>>{OhSixTJ} : Wait a minute, $9.99??? For twitter!!', '>>{imaginethehangover} : Yep, those were the good ol days. When you could change your friend\'s "silent" theme to maximum volume on his Nokia and call him at strategic times during his presentation. Ahh, simpler times. Edit: I don\'t grammar well', ">>{Moath} : As dumb this comments will sound, when I first bought my iPhone I really missed my Nokia's profiles.", '>>{maejsh} : Haha aye! Used to have the change language commands memorized so I could changed friends quick without them being able to stop me muahaa!', '>>{KenNakajima} : This was one of the reasons I went with a Nokia n95 instead of an iPhone back when the iPhone first came out. That and I wanted to stay on T-Mobile and enjoyed my $6 a month EDGE data since I was in college and had wifi almost everywhere I went. I loved the ringer profiles so much.', '>>{imaginethehangover} : You bast! (I like your style).', ">>{M3nDuKoi} : No ads, sometimes it's 50% off. It's a good investment.", '>>{majnus} : I remember not picking up first iPhones for that exact reason too. No profiles? Good luck.', ">>{gewgwegweegw} : No, I don't want themes. I want to trust Apple to get it right, ergonomically and aesthetically. The whole point of using Apple stuff is that you don't get bamboozled by 1000 different config options.", ">>{OhSixTJ} : Do you also leave your vehicle the way they come off the dealers lot? Because I don't.", ">>{geoken} : The average users has night shift on a schedule and has likely never pressed that button and possibly never will. So unfortunately there's no choice but to have that button occupy the space of 4 normal, frequently used buttons.", ">>{geoken} : The exceptions would be usefull if they could be app based (did an feedback suggestion for that). I'm on call so I need my work email to wake me up, but that means I can't put my phone in DND mode so all night my phone is at max volume with notifications tunred on (unless I manually go through and start silencing every other app 1 by 1 every day).", '>>{downnheavy} : Thought so to until the "do not disturb" option came, and it\'s perfect!, you can actually control who will be silenced and who\'s not', '>>{abhinavk} : In Android, Do Not Disturb can be scheduled for calendar events or multiple timeslots. I really miss it on iOS.', ">>{PM_ME_PIC_OF_BOOBS} : Good idea, I didn't know I wanted this until now.", ">>{Nickbou} : This is for so others can view your calendar availability without seeing your actual scheduled items. It's essential for business uses. You can create a meeting and see other people's availability (busy or available) to determine the best time when everyone can meet. People may have things scheduled in their calendar but are actually available to meet at that time. It wouldn't be practical to use this flag for a DND function (at least not on its own).", ">>{f-bastiat} : Strangely, I miss that blinking red light when I had a new email. Man, blackberry's were awesome. Sent from my iPhone.", '>>{whitereader} : I don\'t think so. My Lineage 14.1 has a "System Profiles" menu in the settings. Triggers are WiFi, Bluetooth and NFC (I can also manually trigger them), and it can switch the status of GPS, WiFi, Notification sounds, volume, ambient display and almost everything else. Shouldn\'t be that hard to automate that with Tasker using geofences and stuff. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S5', '>>{geekbot} : They moved the blinking red dot to the Apple Watch!', '>>{endoplasmatisch} : Windows Phone has this Feature since the introduction of Cortana.', ">>{Tyrannosaurus-WRX} : I think I just found an app that will nearly do that. It has no reviews and was just released and isnt free, so I haven't actually tested it AutoSilence by Niv Gutherz https://appsto.re/us/UPoRhb.i", ">>{TopographicOceans} : I tried the full auto silent app. It requires GPS even if you don't do anything with location based silencing, and it drains your battery instantly. Trashed it."]]

classify and reply

['>>{galt1776} : Abundant Guns Contribute to Conflicts With Police, Obama Says', '>>{Stephenay} : Canon announces three new cameras and none of them shoot 4K video', '>>{Hicapacity-maga_zine} : I think you mean "stutters his way through strange rebuke"', '>>{Davidmallet4} : Google Home will give Amazon a run for its money', ">>{mrkhurram} : It's a scalable solution versus Alexa which is only proprietary", ">>{Sylanthra} : Man, why can't this new screwdriver hammer nails? I really wanted the screwdriver to hammer nails. What do you mean its not meant to hammer nails, I got this great omni tool that has a screwdriver, hammer, can opener and even a fishing pole. Its screwdriver is terrible compared to this new one, but at least it can also hammer nails (with quality lower than an actual hammer, but oh well).", '>>{cd943t} : Well, if you include a hammering feature in your screwdriver, advertise that it hammers nails, and most importantly, the competitor screwdrivers hammers nails perfectly fine, even better than many dedicated hammers, then you have a problem.', ">>{SATexas1} : And police shooting black people contributes also. Maybe they wouldn't want guns if they weren't in danger, but they are.", ">>{incapable1337} : Except that I want my screwdriver to be the best screwdriver, not the best hammer. If I wanted a hammer I'd buy a hammer", '>>{RedditBlowhard} : Why would anyone want something around their house listening to everything they do? Just like everything else, we\'ll find out 2 years from now the NSA has tapped into all those devices in the name of "national security", or everything you\'ve said will be sold to Procter and Gamble so they can sell you more shit.', '>>{slartibartfastr} : Especially from an advertising company who rely on massive data collection to exist.', '>>{redeyecoffee} : After 8 years, are the blue collar, middle class better off than they were 8 years ago? I know Wall St. is doing amazingly well.', '>>{bajungadustin} : Said no one.. Im over here with a smartphone.. That includes camera / video recorder / calculator /webbrowser/ email system / storage device / digital wallet / game console / voice recorder / personal computer..... Is it a phone? Of course it is... And it captures 4k video for less than the price of these 3 cameras.', ">>{DebussySIMiami} : No we're talking about the President, not Trump's latest meltdown.", '>>{galt1776} : >“If you care about the safety of our police officers, then you can’t set aside the gun issue and pretend that’s irrelevant,” Obama said.', ">>{WonderCounselor} : We make this sacrifice everyday with so many of our modern conveniences (cell phones, credit cards, networked computers). This isn't really that different-- it's a natural outgrowth of that technology creep that you're fearing. These home devices offer some real modern conveniences, and I'm okay with the risk of those privacy invasions to enjoy those conveniences. Unless you're a committed Luddite paying for all things in cash, you've already lost this battle without knowing it.", ">>{TelldeathNottoday} : No it won't, Google doesn't have as much customers as Amazon. Alexa is the best at voice controls.", ">>{cd943t} : Adding video doesn't make the picture quality worse, nor do any compromises have to be made for usability. These cameras aren't doing the best job out there as photography equipment anyway - unless Canon does something radically new with their sensor technology, which we would probably hear tons of news about, the dynamic range is going to be behind that of the competitors and they still include small, inaccurate pentamirror viewfinders.", '>>{SixVISix} : Abundant forks contribute to rise in diabetes.', ">>{4957896785475684} : Stupid verge and their clickbait headlines. I don't think 4K video is a priority of the demographics aimed at with these cameras. Anecdotally, my mother has a 70D and she doesn't even know or care that it shoots video to begin with, it's for her flower shop so she can shoot pictures for social media", ">>{feedthetroller} : I'd say put it to a test. Put some terrorist propaganda radio on and wait to see how long it takes the NSA to storm your house. Broadcast them entering as a livestream, with a countdown clock on the wall.", ">>{incapable1337} : It captures video in a 4k resolution but it looks nothing like a proper 4k camera, it is a pocket computer but it is nothing like a pc, the one thing it should do properly is being a phone at still modern phones somehow got worse in that. While i do love our all-in-one gadgets as much as the next person, the simple fact is that if I want to shoot proper professional grade photo's, i'm not going to use a phone. If i'm going to shoot professional 4k video's, i'm going to use a proper 4k camera. It's that simple", '>>{DebussySIMiami} : I can understand how Trump supporters would get confused listening to President Obama. He uses polysyllabic words.', '>>{swqe} : If-if-if-if-if-if you think that is a bad speech you are bi-bi-bi-bi-biased as fu-fu-fu-fu-fu...', ">>{TomSaylek} : Source? Google is one of the most used websites and services. Ever. Billions of uses weekly. And here this giant offers a cheaper and quality (we'll see) product.", ">>{incapable1337} : Adding video doesn't make it worse, but it should not be the primary focus. Not sure why you're referring to the old pentamirror system while they've started using prismas a while ago. And in the sensor department, you'd probably know more about the technicalities than I do. My point remains though, it's a photo camera, that's what it's supposed to do, why would i care if it lacks in the video department?", ">>{ezreading} : Notice how they all say the same shit? Like they're told what to say?", ">>{4957896785475684} : > These cameras aren't doing the best job out there as photography equipment anyway Pretty sure Canon DSLR's are basically one of the go-to tools for many professionals that shoot APS-C or full frame digital stills...... Also, they've been using pentaprisms for quite a while now. Optical viewfinders are arguably better than EVF's anyway", '>>{legion02} : One of the bases turns it into a hat.', ">>{cd943t} : It takes like 5 seconds to find on Canon's website the specifications for these cameras, which indeed indicate they use a lousy pentamirror viewfinder: [77D](https://downloads.canon.com/nw/camera/products/eos/77d/specifications/canon-eos-77d-specifications-chart.pdf) [T7i](https://downloads.canon.com/nw/camera/products/eos/rebel-t7i-18-55mm-is-stm/specifications/canon-eos-rebel-t7i-ef-s-18-55mm-is-stm-specifications-chart.pdf) I'm not saying make video the main feature; just make it competitive. It's like arguing that you don't care that a car manufacturer offers leather seats, because it's a car - it's job is to take you from A to B. The problem is not offering standard features makes the car uncompetitive, and there's no reason for a consumer shopping around to consider that car when they can buy a better featured car for the same price.", '>>{Jokesonyounow} : Why does it say (GOOG) (GOOGL)?', ">>{kylepsp} : Quite surprising how unbiased this is from Yahoo, google's (sort of) rival", ">>{cd943t} : I'm talking about these specific models, not Canon DSLRs in general. Professional use has little in common with how most buyers of these consumer models use the cameras anyway. It doesn't take long to find on Canon's website the specifications for these cameras, which indeed indicate they use a lousy pentamirror viewfinder: [77D](https://downloads.canon.com/nw/camera/products/eos/77d/specifications/canon-eos-77d-specifications-chart.pdf) [T7i](https://downloads.canon.com/nw/camera/products/eos/rebel-t7i-18-55mm-is-stm/specifications/canon-eos-rebel-t7i-ef-s-18-55mm-is-stm-specifications-chart.pdf)", ">>{Hurt69420} : If isn't polysyllabic, no matter how many repetitions of it you string together.", ">>{AkirIkasu} : You're right; photographers want to have the best still picture quality they can get, and many will not even touch the video options. I actually think that 4K is worse for consumers because they get gigantic files (at the risk of impared quality elsewhile) that they generally wouldn't be able to notice the difference in quality. The reason why this is a big deal is that all the competition is offering 4K on their mid-range line of cameras. The hardware Cannon puts in these cameras is certainly capable of handling it. The only reason why they don't do it is because Cannon is trying to preserve it's differentiation between it's product lines. In other words, they're just doing it to make you spend more on their more expensive cameras.", ">>{DebussySIMiami} : Trump has a meltdown, suddenly all the Trumpers on reddit can talk about is how many days it's been since Hillary gave a press conference. President Obama gives a speech they all point to the same part of it. Trump's internet drones are well scripted.", ">>{Arsey_Widgeon} : Yeah sorry bit that's a 'no' from me to the idea of Google having an 'always on' mic in my home.", '>>{DANGEROUS_DONALD} : [If-if-if-if-if-if-if he keeps, if if he keeps speaking, uh, you know, uh, okie-doke, I will grow too confused to function.](https://i.sli.mg/gFKJoN.jpg)', '>>{busa1} : Everyone above saying that it doesn\'t need to shoot 4K because a photographer wouldn\'t even video at all. But you all forget the fact that these cameras aren\'t made for high end photographers. They are "cheap" $700 price range cameras made for public non professional maybe even starting photographers. My assumptions are if I\'m a kid who is just about to start photographing than who knows maybe I also want to shoot some videos too to see and decide which one I prefer. Now I know that 4K is not a standard yet, but my question is why not? We see so many tv\'s, monitors, even laptops that are capable of 4K, why not more cameras that can actually can shoot a nice photo AND shoot 4k60fps.', ">>{pinkunicorn} : >I know Wall St. is doing amazingly well. The Clintons will fortify Wall Street's fortunes.", ">>{thercias} : I'm sure Trump is absolutely petrified at the prospect of [Obama trying to stump the Trump](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSxo9-Z5Ki0)", ">>{incapable1337} : Oh that is surprising, a seriously weird choice. And yes i agree that if you have two products of equal quality and pricing, you'd probably go for the one with more features. However, when you have two cars that cost the same, and car A performs way better as a car while car B has more features but in it's primary purpose it's lacking, why would you even consider B?", ">>{miashaee} : I'd say they are better off than early 2009 when the sky was falling. I know I am much better off (my income has tripled), but I am white collar so all the gains went to us.........really this is an income inequality issue more than an economic one as our economy has come back pretty strong. So unless Trump wants to address income inequality then he isn't fixing any of this.", '>>{TelldeathNottoday} : Ya but they don\'t sell nearly as much Google branded items like Amazon sells their brand-name items. Unless Google puts their "Google home" products up on the Google.com front-page like Amazon does, mostly everyone won\'t even know that the product line exist. Google home won\'t give the echo line a run for its money just like their Nexus phones don\'t Samsung and Apple a run for their money.', ">>{dkac} : I think an important distinction is Google's record for standing up for the rights of their consumers. Privacy concerns are on everybody's mind, and it's in Google's best interest to be open and honest with what data they are collecting and what they are doing with it. Anyway, Google already has the search history of who knows how many millions around the globe. If you want to know people's hopes and fears, look no further than their search history. What people actually say in their homes seems like a fairly mundane extension of that.", '>>{redeyecoffee} : http://www.epi.org/publication/missing-workers/ Missing Workers The Missing Part of the Unemployment Story The Big Lie: 5.6% Unemployment http://www.gallup.com/opinion/chairman/181469/big-lie-unemployment.aspx 40 percent of unemployed have quit looking for jobs http://www.cnbc.com/2015/05/20/40-percent-of-unemployed-have-quit-looking-for-jobs.html', ">>{incapable1337} : > they still include small, inaccurate pentamirror viewfinders you referred to canon here, when referring to these specific models, fine, you're correct, otherwise, you're not", ">>{Saudi-A-Labia} : No, that is the massive amount of sugar we consume. But that's what you call a false equivalency.", '>>{cd943t} : What is the title of this thread? What are we discussing if not the announcement of these specific models?', ">>{SubspaceBiographies} : The gf wanted an Amazon echo recently and this was pretty much my response to it. Told her I didn't care if I sounded like a tin foil hat wearing nutter, same reason I don't want a Kinect for the Xbox. Also that thing looks an air freshener.", '>>{contantofaz} : I just watched the video of a cop getting shot at after his gun was stolen by someone nearby. The cop died and his partner also got shot at. Basically when you have a gun, anything could happen. Cops don\'t want to get shot at either. So they will draw first and fire first. And sometimes cops will discharge all of their bullets before they will check on whether the target is still a threat. Doctors and nurses are superheroes. They have to deal with an amount of crap that is god-like. I digress... Here\'s the deal as far as cops go. They want to be able to retire, most of them. The Justice system also favors cops in order not to create precedence and not keep the cops from being able to retire. A cop that loses his job is more likely to become the bad guy, maybe rob some banks or become a vigilant. Together with the cops there is the prison system that we hear is very profitable for the private companies that manage them. Cops hate it that they catch the bad guys, and the prison system cannot keep them away for good. So when they hit the streets again and do something worse, the cops are like "see?" Cops like their BBQs. Cops like their guns. And cops f---ing love to retire on those. God protecting them and their families. Cops retire at a younger age and with more benefits than many people out there. Don\'t ask a cop for advice on how to improve the situation. They don\'t care. For all they see, they are survivors. A cop could see it like "hey cops only kill hundreds of people. It doesn\'t really make a difference." And by and large it\'s probably OK as far as statistics go. We do see it though that cops could push their luck by simply abusing of their authority. When they use non-lethal force and it still gets out of hand, for example. Or when the population are discouraged from filling complaints at the police headquarters by frowning cops there.', '>>{KingPickle} : > Both Trump and Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders have raised concerns about U.S. jobs\' going abroad because of foreign trade agreements, but Obama said "trade has helped our country a lot more than it has hurt." It may have helped GDP, but ask the people in Detroit how they feel about it. More importantly, this current TPP deal expands IP rights. That doesn\'t make things cheaper for everyone. It protects the companies and keeps prices high. So, we have the old trade deals that says "Hey, sorry about your jobs, but at least stuff is cheaper now" and this new set that says "We\'re gonna keep costs high, but you win because...???"', ">>{jeremieclos} : My mom has a reduced mobility due to spinal issues (she can't stay seated in front of a computer very long but she also can't walk a lot), and I will jump on Google Home as soon as it's battle-tested (right now I think the voice recognition on Google Now kind of sucks) in my language if it means it can help her.", ">>{Doubledemogorgon} : Isn't that sort if just expected at this point?", '>>{miashaee} : Not really a "lie", it\'s just that the way that we calculate unemployment isn\'t perfect.......I\'d argue that no measure that we use to calculate unemployment is perfect, the unemployment rate is only useful because it has historic utility and we have a degree of understanding what a good unemployment rate is (4% is perfect employment and all).', ">>{Marou_} : Software glitch, it'll be worked out for future establishment front-persons.", ">>{cd943t} : That situation doesn't exist with respect to adding video to digital cameras. The camera already has to do it to make live view work - they just need to capture the result to a memory card, which is a trivial issue for a large company with significant engineering resources like Canon. These models aren't way better cameras compared to the competition; in fact, in many ways they are inferior.", '>>{MBrandonLee} : Seriously, what are they thinking? Eventually your brand name will not pull you through everything. People want 4K now and many other brands have been providing that for awhile.', ">>{Seventhsonshoah} : Yeah, following our immigration laws, actually checking the people coming in, especially when they're coming from terrorist ran nations, and putting Americans above foreigners and corporations... Absolute madness", ">>{incapable1337} : I strongly disagree, since adding 4k video would force you to add a higher-speed buffer than you'd normally need for shooting photo's (though that would add to your burst speed). This makes it a tad more than trivial. And while these cameras are indeed less than what i'd expect from canon, they have done way better on various models.", ">>{Tex_nomad} : So sick of this complaint, what are people doing that they are so scared of big brother listening in? Who cares? How many doors have been kicked down to this day from illegal eavesdropping? Anyone you know? Nah didn't think so, just gotta find something to complain about...", '>>{incapable1337} : I was adressing the title, not the cameras, actually', '>>{TheCrownedPixel} : Reminds me of something you put in your bathroom that sprays after you have pooped.', '>>{Seventhsonshoah} : Strange. They do all throw around the same talking points, insults, and rhetoric with mild spins on them, almost as if given a script and encouraged to change it up and "make it theirs"', '>>{sircool099} : is it the guns or is it racist police mr. president?', '>>{CosmosKing98} : With that logic no one should have a android phone.', ">>{throwaway029384756} : Cops shoot White people too, and Hispanics, and Asians. Maybe if they didn't attack police or for some, chose a profession other than criminal they wouldn't get shot.", '>>{jeremieclos} : Also consider that only a slice of the population will actually care about the downsides. The very young will just see it as a cool tool, the older generation will just see it as how computer should have worked from the beginning (the "why can\'t I just ask the computer what I want? I thought they were supposed to be smart" syndrome). The latter are too old to understand that this is like a direct line with a corporation that may or may not be compromised by the NSA will just see it as a practical way to interact with their computer. If you think about it from their perspective a computer is like magic (see /r/oldpeoplefacebook for examples) and this is just another layer of magic on top. The former are so young that they don\'t give a shit about privacy because they have never not had this kind of toys, and they will just see this as an early version of Jarvis from Iron Man. They have grown up with a Google account and a Facebook account and a smartphone etc. and everybody already listening to them all the time.', ">>{916hotdogs} : Holy shit. Poor guys teleprompter must have malfunctioned. These other guys can't speak at all without a script.", ">>{HUSTLEMAN420} : > I actually think that 4K is worse for consumers because they get gigantic files (at the risk of impared quality elsewhile) that they generally wouldn't be able to notice the difference in quality. Aren't there advancements in video compression tech that allow 4K to be, despite it being 4x the pixels of 1080, not 4x the file size? My experience shooting with a GH4 at least showed me that it wasn't really that big of a difference. But yeah, Canon is a very conservative company that innovates in what they think is important to their product strategy (the EF ecosystem, dual pixel AF, low light sensitivity in the C-series cameras, build quality) and not just playing me-too! in the megapixel/resolution rat race. They're a lot like Apple in that regard, doing their own thing and most of the time the market ends up following them. Product pricing and longevity is about the same too ;)", '>>{tbrakef} : For innovative things like touchscreen phones and tablets It used to feel like Apple vs Google.... more and more it feels like Amazon vs Google. Apple seems to be stuck on improving their existing stuff, and have stopped innovating new things.', ">>{gorilla_eater} : What you're witnessing here is someone carefully choosing their words before speaking. I can understand why that would look strange to a Trump fan.", ">>{SixVISix} : If you blame an inanimate object for the actions of a human being, you can substitute the object for any other object and it's exactly as stupid an argument.", '>>{Einsteins_coffee_mug} : Heh, That\'s exactly what I thought! I suppose if you think about it, these gadgets are gaining popularity in a bunch of different households. So not everyone likes the "ultra-high tech" or sleek black styles. This might be something more suburban feeling for those who like a "homey" decor. Still, it looks like it masks turds.', ">>{i_smell_my_poop} : Maybe black people want guns because they're afraid of police?", ">>{AkirIkasu} : You are right that a video with four times the resolution won't be four times bigger, but in order to have four times the quality, you are going to need to have more information. Think of it this way: you can have a JPEG file that is nearly perfect if you choose 90% quality, or you can have a four-times bigger JPEG that is the same filesize by reducing it to 20% quality. The 4x image will have greater resolution, but it won't show all the detail and color you could see in the 90% quality image. Beyond that, any advancement that would help lower the filesize of a 4K video should help a 1080 video.. I can also tell you that I'm not terribly happy with Cannon's video encoding techniques (though my camera is getting quite old now).", '>>{Hicapacity-maga_zine} : I am sure he really had to think about that 5th If and 4th Um.', ">>{Saudi-A-Labia} : No that's still a false equivalency. That's like saying cigarettes don't cause cancer because they're inanimate objects.", ">>{full-house-porno} : Lol, Yeah and mouths cause diabetes. Incidentally do you know what we did to get smoking on the decline? A whole bunch of new laws designed to limit people's use of tobacco, and regulate the industry. It's worked phenomenally well.", ">>{my_reddit_accounts} : Me. I automated my entire home with Amazon Echo and it's awesome.", '>>{Broody87} : > putting Americans above foreigners and corporations. Hehehe >Donald J Trump -Owner and Chairman of The Trump Corporation', ">>{FlexibleToast} : Despite all your down votes, I tend to agree with you. I'm almost expecting this to be yet another product Google let's die. They always promise cool things but have really only stuck with a small number of them. Meanwhile Echo is proven and already has a ton of different apps supported. I know after the Google announcement I didn't cancel my Echo Dot 2 preorder.", '>>{Akeb} : She will say anything and do nothing - B. Obama', ">>{janzeera} : Isn't this statement a benchmark NRA narrative? Yes. yes it is..", ">>{AgoraiosBum} : All the factories that used to be in Detroit are now in the suburbs of Detroit - outside of city lines - or in the South. Lured there by tax breaks from Southern states who want the jobs. And also Big 3 managers who put out bad designs without fuel efficiency. It's silly to blame Detroit only on trade. 75 year old factories turn out to not be very efficient.", ">>{SATexas1} : I think the argument is that Blacks are victims of police violence at a disproportionate rate. One of our Presidential candidates thinks Blacks in hoodies are scary so I'm not sure how this gets overcome under that leadership. http://thefederalist.com/2015/07/23/hillary-clinton-lets-be-honest-black-men-in-hoodies-are-scary/", '>>{happyMonkeySocks} : These iot devices are being pumped out with no thought put into security. This kind of device is nothing more than a liability.', ">>{AgoraiosBum} : Trump's just waiting to bust Obama on his birth certificate", ">>{HUSTLEMAN420} : I never liked Canon et al.'s encoding philosophies either- I wanted the most image quality and bit depth regardless of size (reasonably...not the horrors of DNG). Honestly I moved up to a RED and never looked back, RAW and Prores is so powerful and intuitive that I don't need anything else.", '>>{kimmisseswhitedick} : Yeah its not the violent rhetoric of fundementalist islam, blm, or any other group that pushes fact absent propaganda and is given credibility by standing politicians....its the fault of the hundreds of millions of gun owners who commit no crimes', ">>{AkirIkasu} : I really like RED's philosophy for design and how their cameras are modular and extensible. I would get one of their cameras if I did professional video.", ">>{mdobbs} : This is the deal with the devil we make in America. If we're gonna heavily defend our right to own firearms as civilians then we're going to have to accept increased deaths at the hands of law enforcement. Yes we can try and mitigate but it will never truly go away. That's why it's dumb to try and compare America's police actions to other countries where citizens have substantially fewer guns.", ">>{cd943t} : Would a faster one really be necessary? Most recent DSLRs, these most likely included, have a 14 bit ADC. The raw video data bitrate should be around 350 megabytes a second, so Canon ought to be using some ancient DRAM if they can't handle that because most consumer stuff you can buy today is in the dozens of gigabytes per second range. That's 3840 * 2160 pixels * 24 FPS * 14 bits/pixel (then convert to megabytes/second). If we assume a worst case scenario with padding and demosaicing, then you get around 1.5 GB/s, which should still be manageable.", ">>{xtrmbikin} : Except the part where you can physically mute the mic on the Home. Not sure that can be done with Amazon's devices.", ">>{AverageSandersVoter} : Obama also said the actions of a few terrorists shouldn't characterize BLM Too bad he's got an agenda to push because he can't seen to make that logic apply to gun owners", '>>{kimmisseswhitedick} : Yeah thats not true. Blacks account for only about 24 percent of police shootings and the reason they interact with police so much is because they have a 20x criminality rate over white people.', ">>{SATexas1} : Trusting your stat 13% of the nation is black. If 24% of shootings are of black people that's disproportionate", ">>{alltheacro} : > my mother has a 70D and she doesn't even know or care that it shoots video to begin with, it's for her flower shop so she can shoot pictures for social media She bought a $1200 (when new, now $900) dSLR body for social media pictures? That is not only overkill but an actual waste of money; for social media, you're not targetting anything over 2048x2048 - the max size allowed by both Facebook and Instagram. That's four megapixels. A several year old x0D-series body or Rebel would have allowed for 1-2 nice, fast primes for pretty, natural-light, short-DoF pictures. Or a bunch of lighting gear.", '>>{TheCrownedPixel} : I have been wondering if that is like a "feature" which has yet to be released. Like, your pooping, have a question, but don\'t want to open your mouth. This solves that issue.', ">>{TheMessiahg7} : They'll innovate something new when it's actually good. Google makes bare things but many of them flop. The least successful apple product would be the Apple Watch, which are still not that bad of a flop as I see them regularly.", ">>{4957896785475684} : > She bought a $1200 (when new, now $900) dSLR body for social media pictures? > It was actually $0 because she used her business card reward points to get it. I'm returning it for her tho, because the 77D is the same price (899) so might as well upgrade to that for free. You mad? It's a pretty fun camera. Has a touch screen and shit. AF is fast. Also need full size images for the website and for print/media work. > A several year old x0D-series body or Rebel would have allowed for 1-2 nice Rebels are cheapo build quality, no top LCD, dinky sounding shutter, and the older x0D's have inferior sensors and image quality/low light performance", '>>{busa1} : In which circumstances is 1.5GB/s manageable? 1 minute of movie would create 90GB of data, this is not "manageable" category', '>>{soullessgeth} : nobody cares about this stuff...seriously? if people want home gadget stuff like this they want to be able to control from their smartphone...', '>>{TrackieDaks} : Then I have to find my phone and unlock it. Not everyone lives with their phone on them 24/7.', ">>{Meatsim1} : > Yeah its not the violent rhetoric of fundementalist islam, blm, or any other group that pushes fact absent propaganda and is given credibility by standing politicians Its actually not, these incidents become headline news because they are political motivated. However most violent confrontations with police have nothing to do with violent rhetoric or political Islam Edit: downvotes don't change facts boyos", '>>{Alsothorium} : With that logic people should be aware of the permissions they allow on an android phone.', '>>{AverageSandersVoter} : More like the meds but okay. Guess what all mass shooters have in common. Psycho meds', '>>{incapable1337} : It\'s the bit that states "and none of them shoots 4k video" that bugs me, cause it should not matter that much, but that\'s the main focus of the title.', ">>{soullessgeth} : that's an idiotic statement...you have to find this object and walk over there...", ">>{cd943t} : That's the raw output to the buffer. Otherwise you'd have to argue that 1080p video generates nearly 400 MB/s files, which isn't the case. Naturally, the camera would have dedicated hardware onboard to compress the video to more manageable sizes to fit on an SD card. If the DIGIC 6+ on the 5D IV can handle compressing 4K video, the newer DIGIC 7 on these cameras should be able to as well.", ">>{TrackieDaks} : > I didn't cancel my Echo Dot 2 preorder. I did. In an instant. I already have a chromecast audio for all of my different audio systems. Now I can leave them there.", ">>{MostlyCarbonite} : > this shooting Where's the part where he said it was just _this_ shooting that was the problem?", '>>{MostlyCarbonite} : > Cops shoot White people too At a far far lower rate.', '>>{newz_hound} : https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings-2016/ If The Washington Post is to be believed 238 white people vs 123 black people so far this year', '>>{JustinCayce} : Question your stat. If there is a higher incidence of criminality among black people, there will be a higher rate of interaction with law enforcement. [28% of arrests are of black people](https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2012/crime-in-the-u.s.-2012/tables/43tabledatadecoverviewpdf), but only 24% of shootings. Yeah, that is disproportionate.', ">>{314R8} : His Mum wanted a 7D, it cost her nothing, what's your problem? It's a gadget thread not FI. Plus if she likes it and uses the features that's good", ">>{Miraclefish} : Photos aren't just about the size and pixel resolution. Yes social media tends to be small image size, but a better camera can get much more impressive images which you then resize down. You're making the right buying decision argument for the wrong reason - it's not picture size, but cost efficiency.", '>>{i_smell_my_poop} : I guess you could say any shooting that ends up on the news for more than 10 seconds. Ever shooter has no criminal history our mental illness documented.', '>>{tbrakef} : That may be true... it really has been a while. The iphone, macbook air, ipad were all revolutionary. Latley they have been very iterative, or late to the game like the Apple watch. But yeah I do agree that they are more careful with their launches.', '>>{thisisjustmethisisme} : No kid thats trying out some video have a 4k screen on his pc. People who realy can benefit from recording in 4k are not using a 77d. 4k is also most of the time used to scale sown and deliver in fullhd.', ">>{busa1} : You don't necessary use your screen on your pc to view footage. You might got a 4K tv, those are very affordable nowadays, maybe you want to enjoy your own footage on your tv in 4k.", '>>{thisisjustmethisisme} : Oh sorry, I tought you meant people actualy working with the footage and not just putting it straight out to the tv.', '>>{dumkopf604} : So Mr. Obama, what pray tell, do the police officers protect themselves with? BLM signs and good wishes?', ">>{busa1} : As I mentioned in my original comment these cameras are for the mainstream public. Not for high end professionals therefore I assume that there won't be as much post production process in the footage which was produced by these cameras. Therefore it would be a nice add on to have 4K out of the box, nice image quality that can be played on any tv without any post production, and still look generally great.", ">>{TheMessiahg7} : They haven't really put out any true flops like both Google and Amazon have. Just think how many dollars google lost on google glass", ">>{pachydermusrex} : What does it really matter to you? She could have bought the EOS 1D-x or wherever they're at now and it shouldn't make a difference to anyone.", '>>{barbe_du_cou} : So then why bring anything up at all? Do you think he talks about it at college graduations and state dinners too?', '>>{Alreadyforgotmyname} : Thinking of doing the same, starting with might switches. Which would you recommend? One switch needs to be a dimmer.', '>>{Alreadyforgotmyname} : Google is an advertisement company. Amazon is an online retailer so of course Amazon will sell more products.', ">>{tbrakef} : True... dat... but who needs literal billions in profit if you don't do something with it... I'm looking at you Warren Buffet", '>>{dumkopf604} : What about blacks committing disproportionately more crimes than any other demographic, Mr. Obama?', ">>{agloeRegrets} : > It was actually $0 because she used her business card reward points to get it. I'm returning it for her tho, because the 77D is the same price (899) so might as well upgrade to that for free. That... that's not how 'Free' works. All that means is you spent $900 you could have spent elsewhere. Counter point to your $900 choice: http://imgur.com/K0DP8XP The photo, seen above was taken on a $150 Canon T1i. Really, I use it as a full time camera. The person in that picture has an A7RII, Is the A7R better in every way possible? sure! (Well, except I carry one battery and he carries 10) Is the A7RII 20 times better at 20 times the price? No. In most cases I feel the best it can do (at Web resolutions) is 1.5. Sure it's better in a lot of ways, but for that kind of use, it's not worth it. Also.... You do know that the 70D is the prosumer standard of video... right? Like Casey Neistat's entire channel is 70/80D footage.", '>>{RedditBlowhard} : Yah... then convince the NSA it was just a test... got it Maybe I will direct them to this thread for proof! You go first!', ">>{4957896785475684} : > That... that's not how 'Free' works. All that means is you spent $900 you could have spent elsewhere. It's effectively a free camera. As many routine operating expenses as possible are routed through rewards-heavy CC's and every 6 months or so we use the points to get equipment for the office. Last year it was a new mac I used to have a t1i back in college (paid 900 bucks for it on release day) and it was a POS. Only shot 20fps 1080p video lmao. It was all we could afford though since the only other option for accessible cinema-ish cameras at that time was the 5D or a $50K RED Epic. > You do know that the 70D is the prosumer standard of video... right? Like Casey Neistat's entire channel is 70/80D footage. I don't know who that is, but he's probably some prosumer tool that you worship", ">>{agloeRegrets} : Well insulting people doesn't help probably be your point. But in your case why does the (agreed horrible) video function matter for the flower shop? Wasn't that exactly your point? My point Made with the free camera is that you spent $900 of points on a camera when it could have been spent on something else.", '>>{4957896785475684} : I think we got a great camera for the 0 dollars that came out of the primary checking account', ">>{Evebitda} : So you're saying we should limit people's intake of sugar? Gotcha. Ban sweet tea!", '>>{newz_hound} : Then please tell me what a "rate" is....if the liberal rag called the Washington post tells me that white people get shot by police at a "rate" nearly 2 to 1 on black people and you come back with a reply like that', ">>{vegetarianrobots} : >Without guns, unhinged citizenry can't kill police. A trip to the hardware store sure did a lot in New York, Oklahoma City, and Boston.", '>>{RedditBlowhard} : Not a Luddite, and not anti-technology, but also don\'t accept that I should be on stage 24/7 either. How many times have we heard... "we don\'t share your information with anyone" only to find it\'s been shared with everyone. My first response is no to sharing anything.', ">>{Glblwrmingisfak} : Aren't they more likely to die by other methods than they are by guns? As I recall in previous discussions a police officer isn't even in the top 10 or 15 jobs in the US and most of their deaths are from traffic collisions.", '>>{soullessgeth} : in the room great...seriously how innovative is that...do really people need more pointless crap like this? is finding your phone that hard...', '>>{PARK_THE_BUS} : This is an easy one: Redlining by banks and the federal government basically locked out blacks from obtaining mortgages and financing in more suburban/affluent [white] neighborhoods. Boxed in blacks to stay in higher crime ridden areas. Wash, rinse, repeat for decades and viola.', '>>{PARK_THE_BUS} : [One of many articles](http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/03/13/how-we-built-the-ghettos.html) Only way one can ignore this is if their own personal ideology says so.', ">>{DaBoogz} : My mom is blind and I decided to purchase her an Echo. It has helped her so much with simple things like checking the time or weather. She uses it to set timers, add things to grocery lists, listen to music, etc. She also loves to have Alexa to tell her a joke. Plus she can get the latest news headlines or get the Echo to read her a Wikipedia article. I had some concerns about privacy but after buying it for her and watching her being able to interact with it (the Echo is able to understand her really well. I can't say the same for Siri), I would have gladly spent double or triple for one.", ">>{TheMessiahg7} : well being known for bringing out random products all the time isn't good rep for a company like apple. While I understand the hate people have for apple, I still see them as one of the most inovative companies. They don't put out new products often, but when they do they're not just an innivation for the sake of it, but they're actually usefull.", '>>{my_reddit_accounts} : I personally use philips hue bulbs so I use their dimmer', '>>{FlexibleToast} : I have an original Chromecast just collecting dust. Instead I use a HTPC because I got tired of monkeying with 5.1 support', ">>{TrackieDaks} : Oh I don't care for the video chromecast. Totally with you there. I have a plex server and a roku for video but for audio, the chromecast audio is mint.", ">>{Kronos_Selai} : I love all the paranoid people posting here. What century do you think you're living in? There is no such thing as privacy, and it would be nearly impossible for anyone on Earth to have that ever again. 1. Cellphones have the ability to record audio and video even when turned off. Unless the battery is physically removed, a government agency such as the NSA could easily track you, record your conversations, and has already seen your dick pics. 2. There are cameras EVERYWHERE. Not just in cell phones, but on streets, buildings, keeping 24/7 tabs on people. The government didn't invest so heavily on facial recognition algorithms for shits and giggles. 3. Your expenditures are not private. Your info is sold to any and everyone. Advertising isn't going to respect your privacy any more than a government would. You can't avoid this no matter how much you use cash. 4. If you don't like these things, then protest, write your law makers, vote with your wallet, write the companies, and get your reasoning and ideas out there. Don't just whine and scoff over one device while you ARE USING a device right now that is being tracked. Grow some self awareness people.", ">>{TheMessiahg7} : You could take that as an example. Basically companies that think of an innovation and make a product out of it, sell the product and repeat. Each product won't differ much from eachother and some products may actually be worse.", ">>{RedditBlowhard} : I'm sorry, I was mistaken. I thought Reddit was a place where you could discuss things? My bad.", '>>{zeekaran} : It has a button to turn the mic off.', '>>{X019} : What do you mean? As far as I know, the Echo is scalable.', '>>{RemoveTheTop} : Goddamn that\'s fantastic. I bet my grandma would\'ve loved it or had such terrible problems trying to make it work if she were still alive. Her eyesight was starting to go and she was losing a lot of mobility. Boy did she love her kindle. Hahaha she had such trouble with it sometimes and she never wanted to "trouble us" by asking for help (like making the font bigger after she accidentally made it small) even though we always saw her multiple times a week.', ">>{zero_link_karma} : Can't argue with anything you said, but that doesn't mean I'm gonna buy a device with the special purpose of always recording every audio around it and sending it to big company. Yes my phone's GPS is tracked probably all the time, yes some government agencies could tap into my mic, but are you mad at people for not wanting to be the ones who personally take it a step further? By choice? And even paying like 140$ for it :D (sorry English's not my first language)", '>>{Kronos_Selai} : My point is that almost every person already buys a device that either does that, or can do that. Laptops have webcams and microphones, cellphones have several cameras and obviously a microphone, not to mention tons of other sensors. Cars have computers that record speed, and some have GPS as well. Buying additional devices that track us is what we do now. We all have 1 or 2 cellphones (work cell), lots of people have smart tvs, lots have netbooks/tablets/laptops.... etc. I think people vastly overestimate how important they think their inane chatter is around the house. "I don\'t want a device snooping on me!" Ok, fine, but unless you\'re prepared to live in a pre 1980\'s world again, or even further back...there\'s no escaping it. I hated the idea of the Xbox 1 when it came out, because it forced an always on microphone and sensors. The issue isn\'t privacy being invaded, it\'s about what that data is used for once collected. Does my device enforce DRM if people join me on the couch to watch a movie? Not acceptable to me. If I purchase online computer parts from Newegg.com, will that info be shared? Will it target me with relevant ads? Thats ok to me. I only care when my data is being shared to people who will harass me such as robocallers, or in any way that impedes my day to day life. The Amazon Echo improves quality I believe, and doesn\'t make it worse. As paranoid as I\'ve been over the years, I had to learn to accept that my chatter around the house means nothing to the government, and the only people interested in it are companies wanting to sell me crap. Is it right that we live in a time where privacy is no longer existent? I don\'t like it, but that\'s the reality of it. I say, have fun with it. Take those dick pics, be glad knowing some guy at the NSA is looking at it. Make it..."interesting" for them :P', '>>{calvin_peeing} : Pretty sure Alexa has an API, meaning another company could make their service Alexa compatible', ">>{C02JN1LHDKQ1} : You can't fix stupid. People will continue to click the Okay button on dialog boxes that say their flashlight app has access to mail, contacts, calendars, network, SMS messages, and location info.", '>>{ZaneHannanAU} : A lot of their daily search queries are probably variants of `google`. So Google is probably their biggest money-maker. It\'s likely the same for bing, but, as it is Bing, it probably makes more from people searching "google chrome" or (safesearch off required content) than just google.', '>>{ZaneHannanAU} : TL;DR young people and old people: >... The very young will just see it as a cool tool, the older generation will just see it as how computer should have worked from the beginning (the "why can\'t I just ask the computer what I want? I thought they were supposed to be smart" syndrome). >The latter are too old to understand that this is like a direct line with a corporation that may or may not be compromised by the NSA will just see it as a practical way to interact with their computer. If you think about it from their perspective a computer is like magic (see /r/oldpeoplefacebook for examples) and this is just another layer of magic on top. >The former are so young that they don\'t give a shit about privacy because they have never not had this kind of toys, and they will just see this as an early version of Jarvis from Iron Man. They have grown up with a Google account and a Facebook account and a smartphone etc. and everybody already listening to them all the time. https://www.reddit.com/r/gadgets/comments/56afe7/google_home_will_give_amazon_a_run_for_its_money/d8hpymx?context=9', ">>{classic__schmosby} : I can't find it but I saw in an article that the guys involved actually liked that people said it looked like an air freshener. They said that air fresheners are designed to fit the decor, they wanted to make something you didn't have to hide in a corner.", ">>{Onkel_Adolf} : Another NSA spy device that stupid people will PAY to install in their homes! Yeah, I know, that's more *crayzee talk!*", ">>{Onkel_Adolf} : So, you're saying that more spy devices don't matter? In that case, let me install a camera inside your toilet bowl. Tell me your address.", '>>{Onkel_Adolf} : Why are people like you so eager to give away the last shreds of freedom you might have? http://www.theimaginativeconservative.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/1984-John-Hurt.jpg', ">>{Onkel_Adolf} : According to some in this thread, since you already have a laptop and a cell phone it ain't no big deal! Why the paranoia, bro??", ">>{Onkel_Adolf} : These devices don't do shit that we can't already do.", ">>{Kronos_Selai} : Don't pretend to know me and assume I'm willfully giving away my privacy and constitutional rights. I would absolutely love to see the day when the general populace gave a shit, but that simply will not happen unless people are informed and turn up to vote. As it is now, I have 2 choices. 1. I cut off all connections to the digital world. That would include things like Reddit, or basic email. No credit card, no going outside near any camera, no cellphone, etc. Yeah, I'm not living in the year 1900. 2. I accept the reality of the modern world and I try to limit exposure to things I deem harmful. I don't like Facebook for this very reason. I'm forced to keep it for a while longer, but the only info i dish out is my name and city. Having an Echo is no more intrusive than having a cellphone. I talk to the echo, it listens and no doubt uses all the info I give it. I have a cellphone, if I wanted, FBI could show up in mere minutes by saying stupid shit in proximity to the mic. I do NOT use facebook on my cell for this reason, as it does listen in to you. Google is considerably less evil than Facebook, and they already have all my info. I can't take that back, and I'm not going to sweat and worry over them knowing what I beat my meat to. You have to weigh convenience with your privacy. I choose to find a balance. I mean, christ... you're typing this up right now on either a cell or a desktop/laptop. Unless you hide behind layers of proxies, physically remove your mic and cameras (and GPS), you're being watched by automated algorithms.", ">>{Kronos_Selai} : I'm trying to carry on an actual discussion, and that's just being juvenile.", '>>{brettins} : Google Glass was never released - it was in their "moonshots" division, they offered it for a day or two to "explorers" (eg beta testers) to get some data on use. The amount they charged ($1500) and the bugginess of it made it very clear they didn\'t want the public using it at the time. Now that they had a successful public beta, they\'ve moved Glass into a real product division to push forward and prepare is for consumer use.', ">>{rockosolido} : > With that logic no one should have a phone. Sorry to tell you, but it isn't limited to just Android. Or smartphones in general, flip phones are just as susceptible. No one's dad is safe.", ">>{Stumpdrumpf} : It's a juvenile troll. You wouldn't ever get a half-decent discussion about anything out of it.", ">>{FlerPlay} : You made very good and agreeable points. I'd like to add my own perspective. For me it's still just a matter of weighing benefits to cost and risk. I use facebook. I am logged into facebook. They track me on the internet, they track my personal life. I even have revealed damning evidence on Facebook chat. I accept all that for the benefits I receive from using facebook. I could store and encrypt my files locally, I could share photos by driving to friends and showing them physically. I could write my messages with pgp. But I don't because of convenience. There's also other benefits I cannot participate in in any way. I can't be a part of the group chat between my buddies without facebook. I can't see photos of my relatives. Those services are hosted on facebook. A phone or home automation hub that always listens is what I want because I am able to make my life a lot easier with voice control. I alsob drive cars and consume certain drugs because I believe the benefit-to-risk ratio is favorable", '>>{FlerPlay} : Nor is reddit. Anonymity on reddit is an illusion', '>>{ManillaEnvelope77} : Yahoo-ooh-ooh. I vaguely remember that commercial as a child where they sing that. What was a interent company doing selling something through television commercials. Anyone remember?', '>>{chilidbz} : The only thing that would seal the deal on my pre-order is a propeller attachment for the top of it.', ">>{RemoveTheTop} : Yuppers. It's even in one of the MIB movies. Can't remember which.. 2nd one?", ">>{deafAsianAnal3sum} : I don't care whatsoever. I'm too busy enjoying my smart home and all of the piece of mind and increased productivity it gives me.", '>>{SlightlyBentLeft} : I came here for some humor not a privacy fight', ">>{Thaliur} : You can't really manage the system's permissions though. The Google stuff is pretty deeply integrated.", '>>{MLGHatPastry} : I mean if you wanna see me shit go ahead.', ">>{Onkel_Adolf} : Well, yes! Let's *do this*.", ">>{KyomaHououin} : [Until then](http://imgur.com/7hTR3OK.jpg) Eventually we'll get our hands on Google Home Mountain Breeze Edition", ">>{UpstairsNeighbor} : I mean, yeah the guts are proprietary, because they're cloud-based. But Alexa is [free to integrate](http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=176060&p=irol-newsArticleB) and it [has an SDK](http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=176060&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2062551).", ">>{rhythmrice} : Being able to see you while you shit is something that your phone can't already do, the Google home device has no more spying capabilities than your phone", '>>{rhythmrice} : Not when you can say google make my phone ring without even having to move', '>>{rhythmrice} : I have a 5$ dollar raspberry pi with a rockband mic a bluetooth speaker that has the amazon echo software installed on it, and i have airplay on it so i can send music to play on it anytime. I have it in a nice little case in my living room and i have set the sound detection so there can be a tv playing and i can be across the room and the wake word "alexa" is always detected. It does everything this does.', ">>{Onkel_Adolf} : Are you familiar with the 'slippery slope'?", '>>{rhythmrice} : I mean i dont think the device is gunna like "grow" a camera?']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{galt1776} : Abundant Guns Contribute to Conflicts With Police, Obama Says', ">>{SATexas1} : And police shooting black people contributes also. Maybe they wouldn't want guns if they weren't in danger, but they are.", '>>{galt1776} : >“If you care about the safety of our police officers, then you can’t set aside the gun issue and pretend that’s irrelevant,” Obama said.', '>>{SixVISix} : Abundant forks contribute to rise in diabetes.', ">>{Saudi-A-Labia} : No, that is the massive amount of sugar we consume. But that's what you call a false equivalency.", '>>{contantofaz} : I just watched the video of a cop getting shot at after his gun was stolen by someone nearby. The cop died and his partner also got shot at. Basically when you have a gun, anything could happen. Cops don\'t want to get shot at either. So they will draw first and fire first. And sometimes cops will discharge all of their bullets before they will check on whether the target is still a threat. Doctors and nurses are superheroes. They have to deal with an amount of crap that is god-like. I digress... Here\'s the deal as far as cops go. They want to be able to retire, most of them. The Justice system also favors cops in order not to create precedence and not keep the cops from being able to retire. A cop that loses his job is more likely to become the bad guy, maybe rob some banks or become a vigilant. Together with the cops there is the prison system that we hear is very profitable for the private companies that manage them. Cops hate it that they catch the bad guys, and the prison system cannot keep them away for good. So when they hit the streets again and do something worse, the cops are like "see?" Cops like their BBQs. Cops like their guns. And cops f---ing love to retire on those. God protecting them and their families. Cops retire at a younger age and with more benefits than many people out there. Don\'t ask a cop for advice on how to improve the situation. They don\'t care. For all they see, they are survivors. A cop could see it like "hey cops only kill hundreds of people. It doesn\'t really make a difference." And by and large it\'s probably OK as far as statistics go. We do see it though that cops could push their luck by simply abusing of their authority. When they use non-lethal force and it still gets out of hand, for example. Or when the population are discouraged from filling complaints at the police headquarters by frowning cops there.', '>>{sircool099} : is it the guns or is it racist police mr. president?', ">>{throwaway029384756} : Cops shoot White people too, and Hispanics, and Asians. Maybe if they didn't attack police or for some, chose a profession other than criminal they wouldn't get shot.", ">>{SixVISix} : If you blame an inanimate object for the actions of a human being, you can substitute the object for any other object and it's exactly as stupid an argument.", ">>{i_smell_my_poop} : Maybe black people want guns because they're afraid of police?", ">>{Saudi-A-Labia} : No that's still a false equivalency. That's like saying cigarettes don't cause cancer because they're inanimate objects.", ">>{full-house-porno} : Lol, Yeah and mouths cause diabetes. Incidentally do you know what we did to get smoking on the decline? A whole bunch of new laws designed to limit people's use of tobacco, and regulate the industry. It's worked phenomenally well.", '>>{Akeb} : She will say anything and do nothing - B. Obama', ">>{janzeera} : Isn't this statement a benchmark NRA narrative? Yes. yes it is..", ">>{SATexas1} : I think the argument is that Blacks are victims of police violence at a disproportionate rate. One of our Presidential candidates thinks Blacks in hoodies are scary so I'm not sure how this gets overcome under that leadership. http://thefederalist.com/2015/07/23/hillary-clinton-lets-be-honest-black-men-in-hoodies-are-scary/", '>>{kimmisseswhitedick} : Yeah its not the violent rhetoric of fundementalist islam, blm, or any other group that pushes fact absent propaganda and is given credibility by standing politicians....its the fault of the hundreds of millions of gun owners who commit no crimes', ">>{mdobbs} : This is the deal with the devil we make in America. If we're gonna heavily defend our right to own firearms as civilians then we're going to have to accept increased deaths at the hands of law enforcement. Yes we can try and mitigate but it will never truly go away. That's why it's dumb to try and compare America's police actions to other countries where citizens have substantially fewer guns.", ">>{AverageSandersVoter} : Obama also said the actions of a few terrorists shouldn't characterize BLM Too bad he's got an agenda to push because he can't seen to make that logic apply to gun owners", '>>{kimmisseswhitedick} : Yeah thats not true. Blacks account for only about 24 percent of police shootings and the reason they interact with police so much is because they have a 20x criminality rate over white people.', ">>{SATexas1} : Trusting your stat 13% of the nation is black. If 24% of shootings are of black people that's disproportionate", ">>{Meatsim1} : > Yeah its not the violent rhetoric of fundementalist islam, blm, or any other group that pushes fact absent propaganda and is given credibility by standing politicians Its actually not, these incidents become headline news because they are political motivated. However most violent confrontations with police have nothing to do with violent rhetoric or political Islam Edit: downvotes don't change facts boyos", '>>{AverageSandersVoter} : More like the meds but okay. Guess what all mass shooters have in common. Psycho meds', ">>{MostlyCarbonite} : > this shooting Where's the part where he said it was just _this_ shooting that was the problem?", '>>{MostlyCarbonite} : > Cops shoot White people too At a far far lower rate.', '>>{newz_hound} : https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings-2016/ If The Washington Post is to be believed 238 white people vs 123 black people so far this year', '>>{JustinCayce} : Question your stat. If there is a higher incidence of criminality among black people, there will be a higher rate of interaction with law enforcement. [28% of arrests are of black people](https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2012/crime-in-the-u.s.-2012/tables/43tabledatadecoverviewpdf), but only 24% of shootings. Yeah, that is disproportionate.', '>>{i_smell_my_poop} : I guess you could say any shooting that ends up on the news for more than 10 seconds. Ever shooter has no criminal history our mental illness documented.', '>>{dumkopf604} : So Mr. Obama, what pray tell, do the police officers protect themselves with? BLM signs and good wishes?', '>>{barbe_du_cou} : So then why bring anything up at all? Do you think he talks about it at college graduations and state dinners too?', '>>{dumkopf604} : What about blacks committing disproportionately more crimes than any other demographic, Mr. Obama?', ">>{Evebitda} : So you're saying we should limit people's intake of sugar? Gotcha. Ban sweet tea!", '>>{newz_hound} : Then please tell me what a "rate" is....if the liberal rag called the Washington post tells me that white people get shot by police at a "rate" nearly 2 to 1 on black people and you come back with a reply like that', ">>{vegetarianrobots} : >Without guns, unhinged citizenry can't kill police. A trip to the hardware store sure did a lot in New York, Oklahoma City, and Boston.", ">>{Glblwrmingisfak} : Aren't they more likely to die by other methods than they are by guns? As I recall in previous discussions a police officer isn't even in the top 10 or 15 jobs in the US and most of their deaths are from traffic collisions.", '>>{PARK_THE_BUS} : This is an easy one: Redlining by banks and the federal government basically locked out blacks from obtaining mortgages and financing in more suburban/affluent [white] neighborhoods. Boxed in blacks to stay in higher crime ridden areas. Wash, rinse, repeat for decades and viola.', '>>{PARK_THE_BUS} : [One of many articles](http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/03/13/how-we-built-the-ghettos.html) Only way one can ignore this is if their own personal ideology says so.'], ['>>{Hicapacity-maga_zine} : I think you mean "stutters his way through strange rebuke"', '>>{redeyecoffee} : After 8 years, are the blue collar, middle class better off than they were 8 years ago? I know Wall St. is doing amazingly well.', ">>{DebussySIMiami} : No we're talking about the President, not Trump's latest meltdown.", '>>{DebussySIMiami} : I can understand how Trump supporters would get confused listening to President Obama. He uses polysyllabic words.', '>>{swqe} : If-if-if-if-if-if you think that is a bad speech you are bi-bi-bi-bi-biased as fu-fu-fu-fu-fu...', ">>{ezreading} : Notice how they all say the same shit? Like they're told what to say?", ">>{Hurt69420} : If isn't polysyllabic, no matter how many repetitions of it you string together.", ">>{DebussySIMiami} : Trump has a meltdown, suddenly all the Trumpers on reddit can talk about is how many days it's been since Hillary gave a press conference. President Obama gives a speech they all point to the same part of it. Trump's internet drones are well scripted.", '>>{DANGEROUS_DONALD} : [If-if-if-if-if-if-if he keeps, if if he keeps speaking, uh, you know, uh, okie-doke, I will grow too confused to function.](https://i.sli.mg/gFKJoN.jpg)', ">>{pinkunicorn} : >I know Wall St. is doing amazingly well. The Clintons will fortify Wall Street's fortunes.", ">>{thercias} : I'm sure Trump is absolutely petrified at the prospect of [Obama trying to stump the Trump](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSxo9-Z5Ki0)", ">>{miashaee} : I'd say they are better off than early 2009 when the sky was falling. I know I am much better off (my income has tripled), but I am white collar so all the gains went to us.........really this is an income inequality issue more than an economic one as our economy has come back pretty strong. So unless Trump wants to address income inequality then he isn't fixing any of this.", '>>{redeyecoffee} : http://www.epi.org/publication/missing-workers/ Missing Workers The Missing Part of the Unemployment Story The Big Lie: 5.6% Unemployment http://www.gallup.com/opinion/chairman/181469/big-lie-unemployment.aspx 40 percent of unemployed have quit looking for jobs http://www.cnbc.com/2015/05/20/40-percent-of-unemployed-have-quit-looking-for-jobs.html', '>>{KingPickle} : > Both Trump and Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders have raised concerns about U.S. jobs\' going abroad because of foreign trade agreements, but Obama said "trade has helped our country a lot more than it has hurt." It may have helped GDP, but ask the people in Detroit how they feel about it. More importantly, this current TPP deal expands IP rights. That doesn\'t make things cheaper for everyone. It protects the companies and keeps prices high. So, we have the old trade deals that says "Hey, sorry about your jobs, but at least stuff is cheaper now" and this new set that says "We\'re gonna keep costs high, but you win because...???"', '>>{miashaee} : Not really a "lie", it\'s just that the way that we calculate unemployment isn\'t perfect.......I\'d argue that no measure that we use to calculate unemployment is perfect, the unemployment rate is only useful because it has historic utility and we have a degree of understanding what a good unemployment rate is (4% is perfect employment and all).', ">>{Marou_} : Software glitch, it'll be worked out for future establishment front-persons.", ">>{Seventhsonshoah} : Yeah, following our immigration laws, actually checking the people coming in, especially when they're coming from terrorist ran nations, and putting Americans above foreigners and corporations... Absolute madness", '>>{Seventhsonshoah} : Strange. They do all throw around the same talking points, insults, and rhetoric with mild spins on them, almost as if given a script and encouraged to change it up and "make it theirs"', ">>{916hotdogs} : Holy shit. Poor guys teleprompter must have malfunctioned. These other guys can't speak at all without a script.", ">>{gorilla_eater} : What you're witnessing here is someone carefully choosing their words before speaking. I can understand why that would look strange to a Trump fan.", '>>{Hicapacity-maga_zine} : I am sure he really had to think about that 5th If and 4th Um.', '>>{Broody87} : > putting Americans above foreigners and corporations. Hehehe >Donald J Trump -Owner and Chairman of The Trump Corporation', ">>{AgoraiosBum} : All the factories that used to be in Detroit are now in the suburbs of Detroit - outside of city lines - or in the South. Lured there by tax breaks from Southern states who want the jobs. And also Big 3 managers who put out bad designs without fuel efficiency. It's silly to blame Detroit only on trade. 75 year old factories turn out to not be very efficient.", ">>{AgoraiosBum} : Trump's just waiting to bust Obama on his birth certificate"], ['>>{Stephenay} : Canon announces three new cameras and none of them shoot 4K video', ">>{Sylanthra} : Man, why can't this new screwdriver hammer nails? I really wanted the screwdriver to hammer nails. What do you mean its not meant to hammer nails, I got this great omni tool that has a screwdriver, hammer, can opener and even a fishing pole. Its screwdriver is terrible compared to this new one, but at least it can also hammer nails (with quality lower than an actual hammer, but oh well).", '>>{cd943t} : Well, if you include a hammering feature in your screwdriver, advertise that it hammers nails, and most importantly, the competitor screwdrivers hammers nails perfectly fine, even better than many dedicated hammers, then you have a problem.', ">>{incapable1337} : Except that I want my screwdriver to be the best screwdriver, not the best hammer. If I wanted a hammer I'd buy a hammer", '>>{bajungadustin} : Said no one.. Im over here with a smartphone.. That includes camera / video recorder / calculator /webbrowser/ email system / storage device / digital wallet / game console / voice recorder / personal computer..... Is it a phone? Of course it is... And it captures 4k video for less than the price of these 3 cameras.', ">>{cd943t} : Adding video doesn't make the picture quality worse, nor do any compromises have to be made for usability. These cameras aren't doing the best job out there as photography equipment anyway - unless Canon does something radically new with their sensor technology, which we would probably hear tons of news about, the dynamic range is going to be behind that of the competitors and they still include small, inaccurate pentamirror viewfinders.", ">>{4957896785475684} : Stupid verge and their clickbait headlines. I don't think 4K video is a priority of the demographics aimed at with these cameras. Anecdotally, my mother has a 70D and she doesn't even know or care that it shoots video to begin with, it's for her flower shop so she can shoot pictures for social media", ">>{incapable1337} : It captures video in a 4k resolution but it looks nothing like a proper 4k camera, it is a pocket computer but it is nothing like a pc, the one thing it should do properly is being a phone at still modern phones somehow got worse in that. While i do love our all-in-one gadgets as much as the next person, the simple fact is that if I want to shoot proper professional grade photo's, i'm not going to use a phone. If i'm going to shoot professional 4k video's, i'm going to use a proper 4k camera. It's that simple", ">>{incapable1337} : Adding video doesn't make it worse, but it should not be the primary focus. Not sure why you're referring to the old pentamirror system while they've started using prismas a while ago. And in the sensor department, you'd probably know more about the technicalities than I do. My point remains though, it's a photo camera, that's what it's supposed to do, why would i care if it lacks in the video department?", ">>{4957896785475684} : > These cameras aren't doing the best job out there as photography equipment anyway Pretty sure Canon DSLR's are basically one of the go-to tools for many professionals that shoot APS-C or full frame digital stills...... Also, they've been using pentaprisms for quite a while now. Optical viewfinders are arguably better than EVF's anyway", ">>{cd943t} : It takes like 5 seconds to find on Canon's website the specifications for these cameras, which indeed indicate they use a lousy pentamirror viewfinder: [77D](https://downloads.canon.com/nw/camera/products/eos/77d/specifications/canon-eos-77d-specifications-chart.pdf) [T7i](https://downloads.canon.com/nw/camera/products/eos/rebel-t7i-18-55mm-is-stm/specifications/canon-eos-rebel-t7i-ef-s-18-55mm-is-stm-specifications-chart.pdf) I'm not saying make video the main feature; just make it competitive. It's like arguing that you don't care that a car manufacturer offers leather seats, because it's a car - it's job is to take you from A to B. The problem is not offering standard features makes the car uncompetitive, and there's no reason for a consumer shopping around to consider that car when they can buy a better featured car for the same price.", ">>{cd943t} : I'm talking about these specific models, not Canon DSLRs in general. Professional use has little in common with how most buyers of these consumer models use the cameras anyway. It doesn't take long to find on Canon's website the specifications for these cameras, which indeed indicate they use a lousy pentamirror viewfinder: [77D](https://downloads.canon.com/nw/camera/products/eos/77d/specifications/canon-eos-77d-specifications-chart.pdf) [T7i](https://downloads.canon.com/nw/camera/products/eos/rebel-t7i-18-55mm-is-stm/specifications/canon-eos-rebel-t7i-ef-s-18-55mm-is-stm-specifications-chart.pdf)", ">>{AkirIkasu} : You're right; photographers want to have the best still picture quality they can get, and many will not even touch the video options. I actually think that 4K is worse for consumers because they get gigantic files (at the risk of impared quality elsewhile) that they generally wouldn't be able to notice the difference in quality. The reason why this is a big deal is that all the competition is offering 4K on their mid-range line of cameras. The hardware Cannon puts in these cameras is certainly capable of handling it. The only reason why they don't do it is because Cannon is trying to preserve it's differentiation between it's product lines. In other words, they're just doing it to make you spend more on their more expensive cameras.", '>>{busa1} : Everyone above saying that it doesn\'t need to shoot 4K because a photographer wouldn\'t even video at all. But you all forget the fact that these cameras aren\'t made for high end photographers. They are "cheap" $700 price range cameras made for public non professional maybe even starting photographers. My assumptions are if I\'m a kid who is just about to start photographing than who knows maybe I also want to shoot some videos too to see and decide which one I prefer. Now I know that 4K is not a standard yet, but my question is why not? We see so many tv\'s, monitors, even laptops that are capable of 4K, why not more cameras that can actually can shoot a nice photo AND shoot 4k60fps.', ">>{incapable1337} : Oh that is surprising, a seriously weird choice. And yes i agree that if you have two products of equal quality and pricing, you'd probably go for the one with more features. However, when you have two cars that cost the same, and car A performs way better as a car while car B has more features but in it's primary purpose it's lacking, why would you even consider B?", ">>{incapable1337} : > they still include small, inaccurate pentamirror viewfinders you referred to canon here, when referring to these specific models, fine, you're correct, otherwise, you're not", '>>{cd943t} : What is the title of this thread? What are we discussing if not the announcement of these specific models?', ">>{cd943t} : That situation doesn't exist with respect to adding video to digital cameras. The camera already has to do it to make live view work - they just need to capture the result to a memory card, which is a trivial issue for a large company with significant engineering resources like Canon. These models aren't way better cameras compared to the competition; in fact, in many ways they are inferior.", '>>{MBrandonLee} : Seriously, what are they thinking? Eventually your brand name will not pull you through everything. People want 4K now and many other brands have been providing that for awhile.', ">>{incapable1337} : I strongly disagree, since adding 4k video would force you to add a higher-speed buffer than you'd normally need for shooting photo's (though that would add to your burst speed). This makes it a tad more than trivial. And while these cameras are indeed less than what i'd expect from canon, they have done way better on various models.", '>>{incapable1337} : I was adressing the title, not the cameras, actually', ">>{HUSTLEMAN420} : > I actually think that 4K is worse for consumers because they get gigantic files (at the risk of impared quality elsewhile) that they generally wouldn't be able to notice the difference in quality. Aren't there advancements in video compression tech that allow 4K to be, despite it being 4x the pixels of 1080, not 4x the file size? My experience shooting with a GH4 at least showed me that it wasn't really that big of a difference. But yeah, Canon is a very conservative company that innovates in what they think is important to their product strategy (the EF ecosystem, dual pixel AF, low light sensitivity in the C-series cameras, build quality) and not just playing me-too! in the megapixel/resolution rat race. They're a lot like Apple in that regard, doing their own thing and most of the time the market ends up following them. Product pricing and longevity is about the same too ;)", ">>{AkirIkasu} : You are right that a video with four times the resolution won't be four times bigger, but in order to have four times the quality, you are going to need to have more information. Think of it this way: you can have a JPEG file that is nearly perfect if you choose 90% quality, or you can have a four-times bigger JPEG that is the same filesize by reducing it to 20% quality. The 4x image will have greater resolution, but it won't show all the detail and color you could see in the 90% quality image. Beyond that, any advancement that would help lower the filesize of a 4K video should help a 1080 video.. I can also tell you that I'm not terribly happy with Cannon's video encoding techniques (though my camera is getting quite old now).", ">>{HUSTLEMAN420} : I never liked Canon et al.'s encoding philosophies either- I wanted the most image quality and bit depth regardless of size (reasonably...not the horrors of DNG). Honestly I moved up to a RED and never looked back, RAW and Prores is so powerful and intuitive that I don't need anything else.", ">>{AkirIkasu} : I really like RED's philosophy for design and how their cameras are modular and extensible. I would get one of their cameras if I did professional video.", ">>{cd943t} : Would a faster one really be necessary? Most recent DSLRs, these most likely included, have a 14 bit ADC. The raw video data bitrate should be around 350 megabytes a second, so Canon ought to be using some ancient DRAM if they can't handle that because most consumer stuff you can buy today is in the dozens of gigabytes per second range. That's 3840 * 2160 pixels * 24 FPS * 14 bits/pixel (then convert to megabytes/second). If we assume a worst case scenario with padding and demosaicing, then you get around 1.5 GB/s, which should still be manageable.", ">>{alltheacro} : > my mother has a 70D and she doesn't even know or care that it shoots video to begin with, it's for her flower shop so she can shoot pictures for social media She bought a $1200 (when new, now $900) dSLR body for social media pictures? That is not only overkill but an actual waste of money; for social media, you're not targetting anything over 2048x2048 - the max size allowed by both Facebook and Instagram. That's four megapixels. A several year old x0D-series body or Rebel would have allowed for 1-2 nice, fast primes for pretty, natural-light, short-DoF pictures. Or a bunch of lighting gear.", ">>{4957896785475684} : > She bought a $1200 (when new, now $900) dSLR body for social media pictures? > It was actually $0 because she used her business card reward points to get it. I'm returning it for her tho, because the 77D is the same price (899) so might as well upgrade to that for free. You mad? It's a pretty fun camera. Has a touch screen and shit. AF is fast. Also need full size images for the website and for print/media work. > A several year old x0D-series body or Rebel would have allowed for 1-2 nice Rebels are cheapo build quality, no top LCD, dinky sounding shutter, and the older x0D's have inferior sensors and image quality/low light performance", '>>{busa1} : In which circumstances is 1.5GB/s manageable? 1 minute of movie would create 90GB of data, this is not "manageable" category', '>>{incapable1337} : It\'s the bit that states "and none of them shoots 4k video" that bugs me, cause it should not matter that much, but that\'s the main focus of the title.', ">>{cd943t} : That's the raw output to the buffer. Otherwise you'd have to argue that 1080p video generates nearly 400 MB/s files, which isn't the case. Naturally, the camera would have dedicated hardware onboard to compress the video to more manageable sizes to fit on an SD card. If the DIGIC 6+ on the 5D IV can handle compressing 4K video, the newer DIGIC 7 on these cameras should be able to as well.", ">>{314R8} : His Mum wanted a 7D, it cost her nothing, what's your problem? It's a gadget thread not FI. Plus if she likes it and uses the features that's good", ">>{Miraclefish} : Photos aren't just about the size and pixel resolution. Yes social media tends to be small image size, but a better camera can get much more impressive images which you then resize down. You're making the right buying decision argument for the wrong reason - it's not picture size, but cost efficiency.", '>>{thisisjustmethisisme} : No kid thats trying out some video have a 4k screen on his pc. People who realy can benefit from recording in 4k are not using a 77d. 4k is also most of the time used to scale sown and deliver in fullhd.', ">>{busa1} : You don't necessary use your screen on your pc to view footage. You might got a 4K tv, those are very affordable nowadays, maybe you want to enjoy your own footage on your tv in 4k.", '>>{thisisjustmethisisme} : Oh sorry, I tought you meant people actualy working with the footage and not just putting it straight out to the tv.', ">>{busa1} : As I mentioned in my original comment these cameras are for the mainstream public. Not for high end professionals therefore I assume that there won't be as much post production process in the footage which was produced by these cameras. Therefore it would be a nice add on to have 4K out of the box, nice image quality that can be played on any tv without any post production, and still look generally great.", ">>{pachydermusrex} : What does it really matter to you? She could have bought the EOS 1D-x or wherever they're at now and it shouldn't make a difference to anyone.", ">>{agloeRegrets} : > It was actually $0 because she used her business card reward points to get it. I'm returning it for her tho, because the 77D is the same price (899) so might as well upgrade to that for free. That... that's not how 'Free' works. All that means is you spent $900 you could have spent elsewhere. Counter point to your $900 choice: http://imgur.com/K0DP8XP The photo, seen above was taken on a $150 Canon T1i. Really, I use it as a full time camera. The person in that picture has an A7RII, Is the A7R better in every way possible? sure! (Well, except I carry one battery and he carries 10) Is the A7RII 20 times better at 20 times the price? No. In most cases I feel the best it can do (at Web resolutions) is 1.5. Sure it's better in a lot of ways, but for that kind of use, it's not worth it. Also.... You do know that the 70D is the prosumer standard of video... right? Like Casey Neistat's entire channel is 70/80D footage.", ">>{4957896785475684} : > That... that's not how 'Free' works. All that means is you spent $900 you could have spent elsewhere. It's effectively a free camera. As many routine operating expenses as possible are routed through rewards-heavy CC's and every 6 months or so we use the points to get equipment for the office. Last year it was a new mac I used to have a t1i back in college (paid 900 bucks for it on release day) and it was a POS. Only shot 20fps 1080p video lmao. It was all we could afford though since the only other option for accessible cinema-ish cameras at that time was the 5D or a $50K RED Epic. > You do know that the 70D is the prosumer standard of video... right? Like Casey Neistat's entire channel is 70/80D footage. I don't know who that is, but he's probably some prosumer tool that you worship", ">>{agloeRegrets} : Well insulting people doesn't help probably be your point. But in your case why does the (agreed horrible) video function matter for the flower shop? Wasn't that exactly your point? My point Made with the free camera is that you spent $900 of points on a camera when it could have been spent on something else.", '>>{4957896785475684} : I think we got a great camera for the 0 dollars that came out of the primary checking account'], ['>>{Davidmallet4} : Google Home will give Amazon a run for its money', ">>{mrkhurram} : It's a scalable solution versus Alexa which is only proprietary", '>>{RedditBlowhard} : Why would anyone want something around their house listening to everything they do? Just like everything else, we\'ll find out 2 years from now the NSA has tapped into all those devices in the name of "national security", or everything you\'ve said will be sold to Procter and Gamble so they can sell you more shit.', '>>{slartibartfastr} : Especially from an advertising company who rely on massive data collection to exist.', ">>{WonderCounselor} : We make this sacrifice everyday with so many of our modern conveniences (cell phones, credit cards, networked computers). This isn't really that different-- it's a natural outgrowth of that technology creep that you're fearing. These home devices offer some real modern conveniences, and I'm okay with the risk of those privacy invasions to enjoy those conveniences. Unless you're a committed Luddite paying for all things in cash, you've already lost this battle without knowing it.", ">>{TelldeathNottoday} : No it won't, Google doesn't have as much customers as Amazon. Alexa is the best at voice controls.", ">>{feedthetroller} : I'd say put it to a test. Put some terrorist propaganda radio on and wait to see how long it takes the NSA to storm your house. Broadcast them entering as a livestream, with a countdown clock on the wall.", ">>{TomSaylek} : Source? Google is one of the most used websites and services. Ever. Billions of uses weekly. And here this giant offers a cheaper and quality (we'll see) product.", '>>{legion02} : One of the bases turns it into a hat.', '>>{Jokesonyounow} : Why does it say (GOOG) (GOOGL)?', ">>{kylepsp} : Quite surprising how unbiased this is from Yahoo, google's (sort of) rival", ">>{Arsey_Widgeon} : Yeah sorry bit that's a 'no' from me to the idea of Google having an 'always on' mic in my home.", '>>{TelldeathNottoday} : Ya but they don\'t sell nearly as much Google branded items like Amazon sells their brand-name items. Unless Google puts their "Google home" products up on the Google.com front-page like Amazon does, mostly everyone won\'t even know that the product line exist. Google home won\'t give the echo line a run for its money just like their Nexus phones don\'t Samsung and Apple a run for their money.', ">>{dkac} : I think an important distinction is Google's record for standing up for the rights of their consumers. Privacy concerns are on everybody's mind, and it's in Google's best interest to be open and honest with what data they are collecting and what they are doing with it. Anyway, Google already has the search history of who knows how many millions around the globe. If you want to know people's hopes and fears, look no further than their search history. What people actually say in their homes seems like a fairly mundane extension of that.", ">>{SubspaceBiographies} : The gf wanted an Amazon echo recently and this was pretty much my response to it. Told her I didn't care if I sounded like a tin foil hat wearing nutter, same reason I don't want a Kinect for the Xbox. Also that thing looks an air freshener.", ">>{jeremieclos} : My mom has a reduced mobility due to spinal issues (she can't stay seated in front of a computer very long but she also can't walk a lot), and I will jump on Google Home as soon as it's battle-tested (right now I think the voice recognition on Google Now kind of sucks) in my language if it means it can help her.", ">>{Doubledemogorgon} : Isn't that sort if just expected at this point?", ">>{Tex_nomad} : So sick of this complaint, what are people doing that they are so scared of big brother listening in? Who cares? How many doors have been kicked down to this day from illegal eavesdropping? Anyone you know? Nah didn't think so, just gotta find something to complain about...", '>>{TheCrownedPixel} : Reminds me of something you put in your bathroom that sprays after you have pooped.', '>>{CosmosKing98} : With that logic no one should have a android phone.', '>>{jeremieclos} : Also consider that only a slice of the population will actually care about the downsides. The very young will just see it as a cool tool, the older generation will just see it as how computer should have worked from the beginning (the "why can\'t I just ask the computer what I want? I thought they were supposed to be smart" syndrome). The latter are too old to understand that this is like a direct line with a corporation that may or may not be compromised by the NSA will just see it as a practical way to interact with their computer. If you think about it from their perspective a computer is like magic (see /r/oldpeoplefacebook for examples) and this is just another layer of magic on top. The former are so young that they don\'t give a shit about privacy because they have never not had this kind of toys, and they will just see this as an early version of Jarvis from Iron Man. They have grown up with a Google account and a Facebook account and a smartphone etc. and everybody already listening to them all the time.', '>>{tbrakef} : For innovative things like touchscreen phones and tablets It used to feel like Apple vs Google.... more and more it feels like Amazon vs Google. Apple seems to be stuck on improving their existing stuff, and have stopped innovating new things.', '>>{Einsteins_coffee_mug} : Heh, That\'s exactly what I thought! I suppose if you think about it, these gadgets are gaining popularity in a bunch of different households. So not everyone likes the "ultra-high tech" or sleek black styles. This might be something more suburban feeling for those who like a "homey" decor. Still, it looks like it masks turds.', ">>{my_reddit_accounts} : Me. I automated my entire home with Amazon Echo and it's awesome.", ">>{FlexibleToast} : Despite all your down votes, I tend to agree with you. I'm almost expecting this to be yet another product Google let's die. They always promise cool things but have really only stuck with a small number of them. Meanwhile Echo is proven and already has a ton of different apps supported. I know after the Google announcement I didn't cancel my Echo Dot 2 preorder.", '>>{happyMonkeySocks} : These iot devices are being pumped out with no thought put into security. This kind of device is nothing more than a liability.', ">>{xtrmbikin} : Except the part where you can physically mute the mic on the Home. Not sure that can be done with Amazon's devices.", '>>{TheCrownedPixel} : I have been wondering if that is like a "feature" which has yet to be released. Like, your pooping, have a question, but don\'t want to open your mouth. This solves that issue.', ">>{TheMessiahg7} : They'll innovate something new when it's actually good. Google makes bare things but many of them flop. The least successful apple product would be the Apple Watch, which are still not that bad of a flop as I see them regularly.", '>>{soullessgeth} : nobody cares about this stuff...seriously? if people want home gadget stuff like this they want to be able to control from their smartphone...', '>>{TrackieDaks} : Then I have to find my phone and unlock it. Not everyone lives with their phone on them 24/7.', '>>{Alsothorium} : With that logic people should be aware of the permissions they allow on an android phone.', ">>{soullessgeth} : that's an idiotic statement...you have to find this object and walk over there...", ">>{TrackieDaks} : > I didn't cancel my Echo Dot 2 preorder. I did. In an instant. I already have a chromecast audio for all of my different audio systems. Now I can leave them there.", '>>{tbrakef} : That may be true... it really has been a while. The iphone, macbook air, ipad were all revolutionary. Latley they have been very iterative, or late to the game like the Apple watch. But yeah I do agree that they are more careful with their launches.', ">>{TheMessiahg7} : They haven't really put out any true flops like both Google and Amazon have. Just think how many dollars google lost on google glass", '>>{Alreadyforgotmyname} : Thinking of doing the same, starting with might switches. Which would you recommend? One switch needs to be a dimmer.', '>>{Alreadyforgotmyname} : Google is an advertisement company. Amazon is an online retailer so of course Amazon will sell more products.', ">>{tbrakef} : True... dat... but who needs literal billions in profit if you don't do something with it... I'm looking at you Warren Buffet", '>>{RedditBlowhard} : Yah... then convince the NSA it was just a test... got it Maybe I will direct them to this thread for proof! You go first!', '>>{RedditBlowhard} : Not a Luddite, and not anti-technology, but also don\'t accept that I should be on stage 24/7 either. How many times have we heard... "we don\'t share your information with anyone" only to find it\'s been shared with everyone. My first response is no to sharing anything.', '>>{soullessgeth} : in the room great...seriously how innovative is that...do really people need more pointless crap like this? is finding your phone that hard...', ">>{DaBoogz} : My mom is blind and I decided to purchase her an Echo. It has helped her so much with simple things like checking the time or weather. She uses it to set timers, add things to grocery lists, listen to music, etc. She also loves to have Alexa to tell her a joke. Plus she can get the latest news headlines or get the Echo to read her a Wikipedia article. I had some concerns about privacy but after buying it for her and watching her being able to interact with it (the Echo is able to understand her really well. I can't say the same for Siri), I would have gladly spent double or triple for one.", ">>{TheMessiahg7} : well being known for bringing out random products all the time isn't good rep for a company like apple. While I understand the hate people have for apple, I still see them as one of the most inovative companies. They don't put out new products often, but when they do they're not just an innivation for the sake of it, but they're actually usefull.", '>>{my_reddit_accounts} : I personally use philips hue bulbs so I use their dimmer', '>>{FlexibleToast} : I have an original Chromecast just collecting dust. Instead I use a HTPC because I got tired of monkeying with 5.1 support', ">>{TrackieDaks} : Oh I don't care for the video chromecast. Totally with you there. I have a plex server and a roku for video but for audio, the chromecast audio is mint.", ">>{Kronos_Selai} : I love all the paranoid people posting here. What century do you think you're living in? There is no such thing as privacy, and it would be nearly impossible for anyone on Earth to have that ever again. 1. Cellphones have the ability to record audio and video even when turned off. Unless the battery is physically removed, a government agency such as the NSA could easily track you, record your conversations, and has already seen your dick pics. 2. There are cameras EVERYWHERE. Not just in cell phones, but on streets, buildings, keeping 24/7 tabs on people. The government didn't invest so heavily on facial recognition algorithms for shits and giggles. 3. Your expenditures are not private. Your info is sold to any and everyone. Advertising isn't going to respect your privacy any more than a government would. You can't avoid this no matter how much you use cash. 4. If you don't like these things, then protest, write your law makers, vote with your wallet, write the companies, and get your reasoning and ideas out there. Don't just whine and scoff over one device while you ARE USING a device right now that is being tracked. Grow some self awareness people.", ">>{TheMessiahg7} : You could take that as an example. Basically companies that think of an innovation and make a product out of it, sell the product and repeat. Each product won't differ much from eachother and some products may actually be worse.", ">>{RedditBlowhard} : I'm sorry, I was mistaken. I thought Reddit was a place where you could discuss things? My bad.", '>>{zeekaran} : It has a button to turn the mic off.', '>>{X019} : What do you mean? As far as I know, the Echo is scalable.', '>>{RemoveTheTop} : Goddamn that\'s fantastic. I bet my grandma would\'ve loved it or had such terrible problems trying to make it work if she were still alive. Her eyesight was starting to go and she was losing a lot of mobility. Boy did she love her kindle. Hahaha she had such trouble with it sometimes and she never wanted to "trouble us" by asking for help (like making the font bigger after she accidentally made it small) even though we always saw her multiple times a week.', ">>{zero_link_karma} : Can't argue with anything you said, but that doesn't mean I'm gonna buy a device with the special purpose of always recording every audio around it and sending it to big company. Yes my phone's GPS is tracked probably all the time, yes some government agencies could tap into my mic, but are you mad at people for not wanting to be the ones who personally take it a step further? By choice? And even paying like 140$ for it :D (sorry English's not my first language)", '>>{Kronos_Selai} : My point is that almost every person already buys a device that either does that, or can do that. Laptops have webcams and microphones, cellphones have several cameras and obviously a microphone, not to mention tons of other sensors. Cars have computers that record speed, and some have GPS as well. Buying additional devices that track us is what we do now. We all have 1 or 2 cellphones (work cell), lots of people have smart tvs, lots have netbooks/tablets/laptops.... etc. I think people vastly overestimate how important they think their inane chatter is around the house. "I don\'t want a device snooping on me!" Ok, fine, but unless you\'re prepared to live in a pre 1980\'s world again, or even further back...there\'s no escaping it. I hated the idea of the Xbox 1 when it came out, because it forced an always on microphone and sensors. The issue isn\'t privacy being invaded, it\'s about what that data is used for once collected. Does my device enforce DRM if people join me on the couch to watch a movie? Not acceptable to me. If I purchase online computer parts from Newegg.com, will that info be shared? Will it target me with relevant ads? Thats ok to me. I only care when my data is being shared to people who will harass me such as robocallers, or in any way that impedes my day to day life. The Amazon Echo improves quality I believe, and doesn\'t make it worse. As paranoid as I\'ve been over the years, I had to learn to accept that my chatter around the house means nothing to the government, and the only people interested in it are companies wanting to sell me crap. Is it right that we live in a time where privacy is no longer existent? I don\'t like it, but that\'s the reality of it. I say, have fun with it. Take those dick pics, be glad knowing some guy at the NSA is looking at it. Make it..."interesting" for them :P', '>>{calvin_peeing} : Pretty sure Alexa has an API, meaning another company could make their service Alexa compatible', ">>{C02JN1LHDKQ1} : You can't fix stupid. People will continue to click the Okay button on dialog boxes that say their flashlight app has access to mail, contacts, calendars, network, SMS messages, and location info.", '>>{ZaneHannanAU} : A lot of their daily search queries are probably variants of `google`. So Google is probably their biggest money-maker. It\'s likely the same for bing, but, as it is Bing, it probably makes more from people searching "google chrome" or (safesearch off required content) than just google.', '>>{ZaneHannanAU} : TL;DR young people and old people: >... The very young will just see it as a cool tool, the older generation will just see it as how computer should have worked from the beginning (the "why can\'t I just ask the computer what I want? I thought they were supposed to be smart" syndrome). >The latter are too old to understand that this is like a direct line with a corporation that may or may not be compromised by the NSA will just see it as a practical way to interact with their computer. If you think about it from their perspective a computer is like magic (see /r/oldpeoplefacebook for examples) and this is just another layer of magic on top. >The former are so young that they don\'t give a shit about privacy because they have never not had this kind of toys, and they will just see this as an early version of Jarvis from Iron Man. They have grown up with a Google account and a Facebook account and a smartphone etc. and everybody already listening to them all the time. https://www.reddit.com/r/gadgets/comments/56afe7/google_home_will_give_amazon_a_run_for_its_money/d8hpymx?context=9', ">>{classic__schmosby} : I can't find it but I saw in an article that the guys involved actually liked that people said it looked like an air freshener. They said that air fresheners are designed to fit the decor, they wanted to make something you didn't have to hide in a corner.", ">>{Onkel_Adolf} : Another NSA spy device that stupid people will PAY to install in their homes! Yeah, I know, that's more *crayzee talk!*", ">>{Onkel_Adolf} : So, you're saying that more spy devices don't matter? In that case, let me install a camera inside your toilet bowl. Tell me your address.", '>>{Onkel_Adolf} : Why are people like you so eager to give away the last shreds of freedom you might have? http://www.theimaginativeconservative.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/1984-John-Hurt.jpg', ">>{Onkel_Adolf} : According to some in this thread, since you already have a laptop and a cell phone it ain't no big deal! Why the paranoia, bro??", ">>{Onkel_Adolf} : These devices don't do shit that we can't already do.", ">>{Kronos_Selai} : Don't pretend to know me and assume I'm willfully giving away my privacy and constitutional rights. I would absolutely love to see the day when the general populace gave a shit, but that simply will not happen unless people are informed and turn up to vote. As it is now, I have 2 choices. 1. I cut off all connections to the digital world. That would include things like Reddit, or basic email. No credit card, no going outside near any camera, no cellphone, etc. Yeah, I'm not living in the year 1900. 2. I accept the reality of the modern world and I try to limit exposure to things I deem harmful. I don't like Facebook for this very reason. I'm forced to keep it for a while longer, but the only info i dish out is my name and city. Having an Echo is no more intrusive than having a cellphone. I talk to the echo, it listens and no doubt uses all the info I give it. I have a cellphone, if I wanted, FBI could show up in mere minutes by saying stupid shit in proximity to the mic. I do NOT use facebook on my cell for this reason, as it does listen in to you. Google is considerably less evil than Facebook, and they already have all my info. I can't take that back, and I'm not going to sweat and worry over them knowing what I beat my meat to. You have to weigh convenience with your privacy. I choose to find a balance. I mean, christ... you're typing this up right now on either a cell or a desktop/laptop. Unless you hide behind layers of proxies, physically remove your mic and cameras (and GPS), you're being watched by automated algorithms.", ">>{Kronos_Selai} : I'm trying to carry on an actual discussion, and that's just being juvenile.", '>>{brettins} : Google Glass was never released - it was in their "moonshots" division, they offered it for a day or two to "explorers" (eg beta testers) to get some data on use. The amount they charged ($1500) and the bugginess of it made it very clear they didn\'t want the public using it at the time. Now that they had a successful public beta, they\'ve moved Glass into a real product division to push forward and prepare is for consumer use.', ">>{rockosolido} : > With that logic no one should have a phone. Sorry to tell you, but it isn't limited to just Android. Or smartphones in general, flip phones are just as susceptible. No one's dad is safe.", ">>{Stumpdrumpf} : It's a juvenile troll. You wouldn't ever get a half-decent discussion about anything out of it.", ">>{FlerPlay} : You made very good and agreeable points. I'd like to add my own perspective. For me it's still just a matter of weighing benefits to cost and risk. I use facebook. I am logged into facebook. They track me on the internet, they track my personal life. I even have revealed damning evidence on Facebook chat. I accept all that for the benefits I receive from using facebook. I could store and encrypt my files locally, I could share photos by driving to friends and showing them physically. I could write my messages with pgp. But I don't because of convenience. There's also other benefits I cannot participate in in any way. I can't be a part of the group chat between my buddies without facebook. I can't see photos of my relatives. Those services are hosted on facebook. A phone or home automation hub that always listens is what I want because I am able to make my life a lot easier with voice control. I alsob drive cars and consume certain drugs because I believe the benefit-to-risk ratio is favorable", '>>{FlerPlay} : Nor is reddit. Anonymity on reddit is an illusion', '>>{ManillaEnvelope77} : Yahoo-ooh-ooh. I vaguely remember that commercial as a child where they sing that. What was a interent company doing selling something through television commercials. Anyone remember?', '>>{chilidbz} : The only thing that would seal the deal on my pre-order is a propeller attachment for the top of it.', ">>{RemoveTheTop} : Yuppers. It's even in one of the MIB movies. Can't remember which.. 2nd one?", ">>{deafAsianAnal3sum} : I don't care whatsoever. I'm too busy enjoying my smart home and all of the piece of mind and increased productivity it gives me.", '>>{SlightlyBentLeft} : I came here for some humor not a privacy fight', ">>{Thaliur} : You can't really manage the system's permissions though. The Google stuff is pretty deeply integrated.", '>>{MLGHatPastry} : I mean if you wanna see me shit go ahead.', ">>{Onkel_Adolf} : Well, yes! Let's *do this*.", ">>{KyomaHououin} : [Until then](http://imgur.com/7hTR3OK.jpg) Eventually we'll get our hands on Google Home Mountain Breeze Edition", ">>{UpstairsNeighbor} : I mean, yeah the guts are proprietary, because they're cloud-based. But Alexa is [free to integrate](http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=176060&p=irol-newsArticleB) and it [has an SDK](http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=176060&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2062551).", ">>{rhythmrice} : Being able to see you while you shit is something that your phone can't already do, the Google home device has no more spying capabilities than your phone", '>>{rhythmrice} : Not when you can say google make my phone ring without even having to move', '>>{rhythmrice} : I have a 5$ dollar raspberry pi with a rockband mic a bluetooth speaker that has the amazon echo software installed on it, and i have airplay on it so i can send music to play on it anytime. I have it in a nice little case in my living room and i have set the sound detection so there can be a tv playing and i can be across the room and the wake word "alexa" is always detected. It does everything this does.', ">>{Onkel_Adolf} : Are you familiar with the 'slippery slope'?", '>>{rhythmrice} : I mean i dont think the device is gunna like "grow" a camera?']]

classify and reply

['>>{myellabella} : Texas congressman compares Russian hacking to Mexican singers campaigning for Clinton', '>>{iMakeGreatDeals} : \u200bPeter Thiel: We’re Voting For Trump Because We Judge The Leadership Of Our Country To Have Failed', ">>{myellabella} : > A Texas lawmaker on the House intelligence committee says it wasn't just the Russians who interfered in last year's election. > Rep. Mike Conaway, R-Midland, is comparing the use of Mexican entertainers to energize Democratic voters to the email hacking that officials say was orchestrated by Vladimir Putin's government. > “Harry Reid and the Democrats brought in Mexican soap opera stars, singers and entertainers who had immense influence in those communities into Las Vegas, to entertain, get out the vote and so forth,” Conaway told The Dallas Morning News this week. **“Those are foreign actors, foreign people, influencing the vote in Nevada. You don’t hear the Democrats screaming and saying one word about that.”**", '>>{OldMutant} : The Lamestream democrat activist media campaigning for democrats in every election is more concerning to me than Russians releasing democrat Hillary emails. Everyone already knew Hillary is a lying corrupt carreer criminal.', '>>{Benjamin_Ghazi_} : The Texas congressguy makes great point in this very credible articles, no? Is not like anybody believes Russia really influenced election, right? But campaign of the crooked Clinton made employs of the foreign Mexicans to get votes, no? American peoples is still much more concerned about the problems of the Clinton than these anti-Trump stories. This, in my opinion, is much larger issue here than phony reportings of silly Russian hacks, and I say this as humble American patriot and tree farmer from the great state of the Idaho.', ">>{glowmoss} : Omarosa: Critics will have to 'bow down' to President Trump", '>>{glowmoss} : > Former "Apprentice" star and Donald Trump supporter Omarosa Manigault predicts critics of the businessman will have to "bow down" to a President Trump. > "Every critic, every detractor, will have to bow down to President Trump," Manigault says in a trailer released Tuesday for a 2-hour Frontline PBS election special. Yikes. edit: Let us remember what President Obama said: "We don\'t look to be ruled."', '>>{Craic_Cocaine} : Snopes Co-Founder Accused Of Embezzling Company Money, Spending It On Prostitutes', ">>{FewerMoonves} : Well, Congressman, show me the last time Vladimir Putin won a Daytime Emmy, and you'll have my attention.", '>>{pondo13} : Yes but you are also clearly brain dead so who cares what you think.', '>>{Kanzisbuddy} : America has been very good to him by making him rich. I suspect it\'s the ethnicity of the current occupant of the White House that is bothering him... Of course, the fact that most of Trump\'s supporters also think a "normal" America would also be homophobic isn\'t as important to him.', ">>{Scottie_Pippen33} : I'm glad the Russians influenced the election by showing how the DNC unfairly and illegally influenced the election.", '>>{Benjamin_Ghazi_} : Thank you, fellow American citizens. I just joined the reddit very recently after I found the site on my own with google searches of the politic. I find this is great place for the discussing of the issue that concern us all as American peoples, yes?', '>>{GunnieGraves} : How is this bitch qualified to talk about anything?', '>>{Tenacious_Ceeee} : Texas republicans apologizing for the Russians. Are we living in an alternate universe?', '>>{CNegan} : Or you\'re voting for him because he pledged to put a moratorium on financial regulation and repeal Dodd-Frank, which helps your business, but continue to pretend like you\'re doing it "for the people".', '>>{spew2014} : Igor?! It me, Piotr- from the cubicle #13! What is odds we meet here?!?', '>>{bbiggs32} : Da...err yes, otlichno...err very good, comrade.', ">>{Sugarysam} : If you're unfamiliar with it, Midland is every bit the sophisticated, cosmopolitan place you would expect it to be. No rubes to be found there, none at all. This guy is the jewel of the bunch.", ">>{jmktimelord} : That's absurd. First of all, Obama has been blocked at every turn by an obstructionist Republican Congress refusing to do its constitutional duty. However, voting for Trump isn't going to fix that. Second, we all know Trump lacks leadership skills, offered to let his VP run everything while he was in office, and lacks the temperament to be president. How is voting for him a solution... to anything?", '>>{Craic_Cocaine} : I guess its more like "husband-and-prostitute" team, though that doesn\'t sound nearly as nice as with a wife. Nice to know the internet gets its facts from a literal whore.', '>>{thenottoserious} : Not just "some people", he is an elected public official.', '>>{kescusay} : Pffft. Daily Caller trying desperately to deflect attention from their lies.', '>>{dmb1279} : Someone tell her that her 15 minutes are long gone', ">>{uhmmaybe} : Let this sink in: She is the Trump campaign's director of African-American outreach. What the fuck...", '>>{ME24601} : ...and we want it to fail *even more*.', '>>{Eggbertoh} : Last I knew "Leadership of our country" included Congress.', '>>{wearewatchingyounow} : dude it must suck to think facts matter. *berg', '>>{adamwho} : That is like committing suicide because you have a cold.', ">>{buckeye_baker} : C'mon. Everyone has to be trolling at this point.", '>>{dariusorfeed} : Well, the thing about facts is they don\'t change based on how someone feels. Facts are facts, the Germans learned that the hard way back during ww2 when they decided "jew physics" shouldn\'t be allowed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsche_Physik', '>>{PersecuteHillary} : I get it now. This whole thing is about the 2017 reality TV season?', '>>{wearewatchingyounow} : the more i read about those crazy nazis the more i realize the fringes of both american parties have in common with them', '>>{beatyatoit} : I hated her with a passion when she was on "The Apprentice" because of her "I\'m simply better than you, peon" attitude, and I hate her even more now. She quite clearly sees this as a very high risk/high reward venture. If it sinks, she goes back to whoring herself. If he wins, which at this point is very unlikely and getting more so by the hour, she will be where she wants to be; sucking the ass of someone in a position of great power.', ">>{throwmeaway69b} : If it were someone else, I'd suggest they were trying to sabotage the campaign. But she's a fucking idiot, so..", '>>{CMDR-Ad-Victoriam} : This is what you get when politics involves itself in dictating science.', '>>{dariusorfeed} : Well, this is more of a problem with "terminal values." Any ideology can be weaponized. One of my favorite quotes: >> I\'ve never joined any organization—not even the ones I\'ve organized myself. I prize my own independence too much. And philosophically, I could never accept any rigid dogma or ideology, whether it\'s Christianity or Marxism. One of the most important things in life is what Judge Learned Hand described as \'that ever-gnawing inner doubt as to whether you\'re right.\' If you don\'t have that, if you think you\'ve got an inside track to absolute truth, you become doctrinaire, humorless and intellectually constipated. The greatest crimes in history have been perpetrated by such religious and political and racial fanatics, from the persecutions of the Inquisition on down to Communist purges and Nazi genocide.', ">>{anon902503} : Our leaders have failed. Guess it's time to burn down the entire country and piss on the ashes! Fuck this arrogant prick.", ">>{WatchingDonFail} : Wow. I wonder why this isn't a problem when Don does it", ">>{Trunkington} : Can't the Co-Founder label this Fake News and be in the clear?", '>>{PuffyHerb} : >DailyCaller accused the Snopes Co-Founder of embezzling $98,000 of company money on prostitutes. After consulting with the co-founder we determined the amount spent was indeed $98,000, however $12,000 of that was from his own personal income. Therefore only $86,000 of companies funds were actually used. > We rate this claim as **pants on fire**.', ">>{t88m} : From the Donald's website. Glad it's not biased...", ">>{PersecuteHillary} : She's the best he could find among all three or four of his black supporters.", ">>{FatLadySingin} : I'm confused. Is she Trump's African American or is she just his *spare* African American? I seriously don't know how this works.", '>>{alllie} : Glad to notice that more people have noticed what an ass Thiel is.', '>>{mhwtexplode} : Every time they open their mouths out spills something else that makes my head want to...BOOM', '>>{Isstvan82} : “If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.” ― Samuel Adams', ">>{Ms7806} : People take it as a fact that countries can't always get much worse. Things aren't looking good to some people so obviously we need ANYTHING else rather than what we have. That'll fix things.", '>>{irwincur} : Say what you will but they are right on this one.', '>>{PuffyHerb} : Snopes is a joke though really - it tries to pass itself off as a neutral fact checker, but it\'s just another part of the liberal propaganda machine. I\'ve seen so many examples of Dems being rated ~~"half true"~~ "mixture" and yet when a Repubican says the same thing it\'ll be ~~"pants on fire"~~ "false". EDIT: changed the wording from Politifact\'s wording to Snopes wording - still stand by comments.', '>>{somas} : Is this a joke? "Pants on fire" and "Half-true" are used by Politifact not Snopes.', ">>{ILikeLenexa} : I mean if you're Somalia more power to you, but people don't have any idea how bad it can get.", '>>{Destijl14} : Can you please link to one example of this?', '>>{PuffyHerb} : Whatever, they\'re both a joke. I don\'t read them anymore. Just quickly checked Snopes and I can see "True", "Unproven", "False", "Mixture".. same crap different words, who cares.', '>>{adamwho} : The VAST majority of these Trump voters who want to "make America great again" have never stepped outside the US and realized that America is already pretty great. What they are experiencing is alienation because their "America" (small town and generally poor) is a like a third world country compared to the more populous and educated coasts.', ">>{PostTruthPete} : Sounds like a Trump move. We sure he's not related?", '>>{winstonsmith7} : Bow down to one and get kicked and told to GTFO by the other. Nice choice.', '>>{RealRepub} : The dumb duck repubs have failed. Global warming tax policy education healthcare. The dems built the middle class.', ">>{PostTruthPete} : > I don't read them anymore. That's the spirit. Live in your bubble.", ">>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : We had a revolution to get rid of people who said 'I alone can fix it!'", '>>{L9CockOfTheInfinite} : Uh, try reading the articles before you denigrate it.', '>>{kescusay} : No. No, he can\'t. Because he\'s just repeating a "fact" he heard from someone else.', ">>{OptionTheThird} : Well, that's unnecessary, no matter how wrong she is.", ">>{theombudsmen} : According to Tucker Carlson's consetvative fake news platform? Those fringe right partisans hate Snopes for always calling them out on their bullshit. I'll wait for this news to hit something a bit more mainstream before buying into it.", '>>{SarcasticallyAShill} : Conservative "media" is desperate to discredit fact checkers', '>>{HarlanCedeno} : I think someone is angling for a promotion to replace Katrina Pierson.......', ">>{silviazbitch} : Fuckin' A, Sam! You're the kind of guy someone should name a brewery after.", '>>{woolcommerce} : > I\'ve seen so many examples of Dems being rated "half true" "mixture" and yet when a Repubican says the same thing it\'ll be "pants on fire" "false". Examples? There so many, I suppose you can give them right quick.', '>>{woolcommerce} : We got to do our part. Report this as not explicitly about US politics, and downvote this garbage propaganda.', ">>{silviazbitch} : We've already established what kind of woman she is. Now we're just haggling over the price.", '>>{guamhascapsized} : In all fairness a random prostitute would probably do a better job fact checking than the degenerate shills/hacks that operate Snopes.', ">>{impalala} : So 17 government intelligence agencies are all on the same page and announce that Russia influenced the election and that's unbelievable without solid public evidence, but the woman suing him in what is by all accounts an incredibly nasty divorce that's been going on for years is automatically believed without any evidence at all other than her claim. Got it.", '>>{Animated_post} : Whoa, so this is how its going to begin? Call out the few fact check sites we have so Trump can lie for the next 4, 8 or who knows how many more years.', ">>{WTF_Fairy_II} : I don't know what I'm talking about but I know they're wrong because feels.", '>>{Isstvan82} : “Let no man thirst for good beer.” – Sam Adams', ">>{WTF_Fairy_II} : Don't bother. It's taken from divorce papers filed by his ex-wife. Because we all know bitter spouses trying to maximize their alimony is the best source of facts.", '>>{WTF_Fairy_II} : They are right in that he was accused. Now, are accusations filed in divorce papers something we should rely on? You decide.', ">>{orangesarenotnasty} : She is, honestly. You've got Omarosa, Herman Cain, Ben Carson, and that Diamond and Silk duo. Of the five, Omarosa is by far the most competent.", '>>{TheLateApexLine} : Yeaaaah that\'s the ticket! **"DICTATOR DONALD"** I like it.', '>>{goody_heggety} : Ho ho like Trumpistas never have bad divorce depositions.', '>>{Dzmagoon} : Absolutely - imagine what would happen if everything that was accused in divorce papers was assumed to be true. Why, someone could even be accused of marital rape!', ">>{shatfacekila} : Atleast he wasn't storing it in some off shore bank account. All of that went right back into the economy!", '>>{MODS-ARE-EVIL} : All shall bow before God-Emperor Trump or face his cheese-flavored, spray-tanned wrath!', ">>{KKKafir} : Has any of Obama's critic bowed down? If Hillary is elected, will her critics bow down?", ">>{TheLateApexLine} : When I'm lurking in The_D I'm always suspicious of the super fervent comments with excellent grammar.", ">>{waste-of-skin} : The washington post's editor in chief will have to kiss Trump's greasiest hemorrhoid.", ">>{PersecuteHillary} : and she's got an African sounding name. It worked for Obama.", ">>{wertewrtwertqw} : Yeah. On the front page of that sub right now there's a video from twitter that is supposed to show low turnout for a Clinton event but the room looked pretty full to me.", '>>{silviazbitch} : Behold the rain which descends from heaven upon our vineyards, there it enters the roots of the vines, to be changed into wine, a constant proof that God loves us, and loves to see us happy. -- Ben Franklin', '>>{theendofanerror} : This is a campaign of retribution, not progress.', ">>{PresidentChaos} : Omarosa's doing a fine job of whipping black voters into joining the Trump team!", '>>{Imnotananimalyouare} : She is director of his African American relations or something fancy like that.', '>>{HarlanCedeno} : Whatever happened to Herman Cain? I feel like he could be a real voice of reason in the party now.', '>>{orangesarenotnasty} : He goes on Fox News to yell at black people on occasion. Big Trump supporter.', ">>{ordeal123} : You're all racist for disagreeing with a black person. Bigots and racists.", '>>{cowboysfan88} : Sam Adams is a known Clinton shill! /s', '>>{TuckRaker} : Nope, because he no longer has a prayer of winning.', ">>{MC_Fap_Commander} : If he wins, they should play Motorhead's HHH theme song for the inauguration and he should wear a skull crown and spit water.", '>>{savuporo} : How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words! - Melania Trump', '>>{orangesarenotnasty} : She has described herself as a ["half-breed" like Obama] (http://www.salon.com/2016/01/25/trump_spokeswoman_stands_by_tweet_referring_to_obama_as_half_breed/) so I didn\'t include her in the list.', '>>{Isstvan82} : If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin. - Samuel Adams', '>>{Ximitar} : Once Pokémon Go got off the ground, he was never seen again. Some say he wanders the Earth this day, taking neither food nor rest, and has sworn to catch them all. There are unconfirmed reports he was seen last month in Uzbekibekibekistanstan.', ">>{mx9875} : Recently I had an exchange that made me understand that subreddit. I got into a discussion over there over a post that was coherent but in total denial of reality. And then someone PM'ed me (it was not OP, but an alt I assume) and over a few messages admitted that he and a few others have a contest going on how much karma they can gain this election cycle with batshit crazy posts over there. Post ended up with 3000+ upvotes. If I were a conspiracy type I would even think that this is why self-posts are getting karma now and reddit admins are in on this wager. Or maybe the guy who PM'ed me was fucking with me. Who knows.", ">>{Ximitar} : Yes he does. Don't take it for granted that his goose is cooked. There's three months to go, and people have disastrously short memories. He's down but not out, so don't turn your back on him, and for god's sake don't stay home on election day!", '>>{the92jays} : Omarosa is a Trump surrogate because Trump is bad at running for President.', '>>{RidleyScotch} : I believe the Trump campaigns calls it The Negro Outreach. This African-American outreach is just some liberal bias.', '>>{silviazbitch} : >"A person she has always liked is Sam Adams," the speechwriter, Meredith McIver, said of Melania Trump in a statement Wednesday from the campaign. "Over the phone, she read me some passages from Mr. Adams\'s speech as examples. I wrote them down and later included some of the phrasing in the draft that ultimately became the final speech."', ">>{EggbroHam} : Voice of reason? Tea Partier Herman Cain? You can check his twitter, he's pretty actively tweeting for Trump.", '>>{VacationAwayFromWork} : > a 2-hour Frontline PBS election special. Well this ought to be rich.', ">>{HarlanCedeno} : Yeah, I probably should've added a /s. Ah well.", ">>{GunnieGraves} : Director of Making Me Look Ok To The Coloreds. Then they have to tell him it's not ok to call them colored anymore.", ">>{sparklesinmytummy} : I thought he was trolling at the beginning of his run, then he started winning and I feared he might actually be serious, and now I'm like, no, definitely trolling.", ">>{Kaiosama} : Trump's 'African-American' liaison seems to be making in-roads in the mouth running department I see.", '>>{sparklesinmytummy} : A whole 1% of them. Great job!', ">>{historycat95} : She also said in an NPR interview that she would be using her position as a minister in black churches to campaign for Trump. But I bet no one will withdraw tax exempt status. HU: What will you be doing between now and Election Day? MANIGAULT: As a Baptist minister, I still believe in the power of the pulpit and going into black churches, going into barbershops and beauty shops, going into homes and having very intimate town halls. So I'm very excited, but I only have 100 days to get this done. NPR 7/31/16", ">>{garglemymarbles} : like he's some fucking king, right? trumpanzees don't seem to understand the US is a constitutional republic.", '>>{pgabrielfreak} : OMG I love me some Frontline! Rich indeed.', ">>{toxicroach} : I'm trying to relate to America. How about I hire another reality star who is famous for being an enormous asshole? Sounds like a plan. I need a door to door guy. Is Charles Manson available? Is he still in jail?", '>>{BedWedOrBehead} : Yeah. He told them to take my jacket.', ">>{nulledit} : God, so snarky! Take your liberal blinders off for a moment, please. All evidence shows that she's doing a *great* job for the Trump campaign keeping African-Americans [out of reach](http://insider.foxnews.com/amp/article/50817).", '>>{George_Jefferson} : Probably still working on his 9-9-9 tax plan.', '>>{Adamj1} : We gotta pardon this guy. We gotta pardon him. We need creative guys, many people are talking about it. We gotta have the creative guy pardon. Believe me, we need someone like Charlie who, like me, can think outside of the loser box. Literally sarcastically non-sarcastic tone.', ">>{Adamj1} : That name don't sound very 'murican to me. Her full name Omarosa Gaddafi Manigault?", ">>{daybreaker} : It's even worse that she's supposed to be his director of african american outreach, and she's saying people will need to bow to him.", '>>{JackOCat} : She apparently went to the Sith school of management.', ">>{MasterK999} : If you watched the season of the Apprentice she was on this starts to make more sense. She has an IQ of like 90 on a good day and is willing to do almost anything to stay in Trump's good graces. I really should not be that mean. She is not stupid as such but she has an amazing ability for self-delusion. Exactly like Trump does.", ">>{Azureknight205} : I can't believe Michael Clarke Duncan was engaged to her when he died. He seemed like a stand-up, loveable, teddy bear of a guy, while she is now the mouthpiece of a horrible, small-handed, hate spewing daughter fondler. Sad!", ">>{jibberwockie} : An African-American woman telling people that they are going to have to bow down (submit) to an arrogant white man? Have I got that right? I'm not American, but I thought you folks quite naturally stood up to these sort of threats. This isn't the America I admire.", ">>{RosemaryFocaccia} : Some people are saying that she's the vice-president of NAMBLA.", '>>{cleverusername323500} : And doing a bang up job at it, clearly.', '>>{BatCountry9} : We get karma for self-posts now? I gotta start making up shit to confess.', ">>{IamConradBlack} : And he's polling at 1%, she's doing a bang up job.", '>>{tetzy} : Ladies and Gentlemen, meet the one black person in America to vote Trump.', '>>{MiniatureBadger} : Cheeto Benito Il Douche Sad! the Impaler Rafael Trumpjillo Baby Hands Doc', '>>{LOCUTUS_OF__BORG} : Possibly the most tone deaf, idiotic thing someone has said in this campaign. SAD!']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{myellabella} : Texas congressman compares Russian hacking to Mexican singers campaigning for Clinton', ">>{myellabella} : > A Texas lawmaker on the House intelligence committee says it wasn't just the Russians who interfered in last year's election. > Rep. Mike Conaway, R-Midland, is comparing the use of Mexican entertainers to energize Democratic voters to the email hacking that officials say was orchestrated by Vladimir Putin's government. > “Harry Reid and the Democrats brought in Mexican soap opera stars, singers and entertainers who had immense influence in those communities into Las Vegas, to entertain, get out the vote and so forth,” Conaway told The Dallas Morning News this week. **“Those are foreign actors, foreign people, influencing the vote in Nevada. You don’t hear the Democrats screaming and saying one word about that.”**", '>>{OldMutant} : The Lamestream democrat activist media campaigning for democrats in every election is more concerning to me than Russians releasing democrat Hillary emails. Everyone already knew Hillary is a lying corrupt carreer criminal.', '>>{Benjamin_Ghazi_} : The Texas congressguy makes great point in this very credible articles, no? Is not like anybody believes Russia really influenced election, right? But campaign of the crooked Clinton made employs of the foreign Mexicans to get votes, no? American peoples is still much more concerned about the problems of the Clinton than these anti-Trump stories. This, in my opinion, is much larger issue here than phony reportings of silly Russian hacks, and I say this as humble American patriot and tree farmer from the great state of the Idaho.', ">>{FewerMoonves} : Well, Congressman, show me the last time Vladimir Putin won a Daytime Emmy, and you'll have my attention.", '>>{pondo13} : Yes but you are also clearly brain dead so who cares what you think.', ">>{Scottie_Pippen33} : I'm glad the Russians influenced the election by showing how the DNC unfairly and illegally influenced the election.", '>>{Benjamin_Ghazi_} : Thank you, fellow American citizens. I just joined the reddit very recently after I found the site on my own with google searches of the politic. I find this is great place for the discussing of the issue that concern us all as American peoples, yes?', '>>{Tenacious_Ceeee} : Texas republicans apologizing for the Russians. Are we living in an alternate universe?', '>>{spew2014} : Igor?! It me, Piotr- from the cubicle #13! What is odds we meet here?!?', '>>{bbiggs32} : Da...err yes, otlichno...err very good, comrade.', ">>{Sugarysam} : If you're unfamiliar with it, Midland is every bit the sophisticated, cosmopolitan place you would expect it to be. No rubes to be found there, none at all. This guy is the jewel of the bunch.", '>>{thenottoserious} : Not just "some people", he is an elected public official.'], ['>>{Craic_Cocaine} : Snopes Co-Founder Accused Of Embezzling Company Money, Spending It On Prostitutes', '>>{Craic_Cocaine} : I guess its more like "husband-and-prostitute" team, though that doesn\'t sound nearly as nice as with a wife. Nice to know the internet gets its facts from a literal whore.', '>>{kescusay} : Pffft. Daily Caller trying desperately to deflect attention from their lies.', '>>{wearewatchingyounow} : dude it must suck to think facts matter. *berg', '>>{dariusorfeed} : Well, the thing about facts is they don\'t change based on how someone feels. Facts are facts, the Germans learned that the hard way back during ww2 when they decided "jew physics" shouldn\'t be allowed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsche_Physik', '>>{wearewatchingyounow} : the more i read about those crazy nazis the more i realize the fringes of both american parties have in common with them', '>>{CMDR-Ad-Victoriam} : This is what you get when politics involves itself in dictating science.', '>>{dariusorfeed} : Well, this is more of a problem with "terminal values." Any ideology can be weaponized. One of my favorite quotes: >> I\'ve never joined any organization—not even the ones I\'ve organized myself. I prize my own independence too much. And philosophically, I could never accept any rigid dogma or ideology, whether it\'s Christianity or Marxism. One of the most important things in life is what Judge Learned Hand described as \'that ever-gnawing inner doubt as to whether you\'re right.\' If you don\'t have that, if you think you\'ve got an inside track to absolute truth, you become doctrinaire, humorless and intellectually constipated. The greatest crimes in history have been perpetrated by such religious and political and racial fanatics, from the persecutions of the Inquisition on down to Communist purges and Nazi genocide.', ">>{WatchingDonFail} : Wow. I wonder why this isn't a problem when Don does it", ">>{Trunkington} : Can't the Co-Founder label this Fake News and be in the clear?", '>>{PuffyHerb} : >DailyCaller accused the Snopes Co-Founder of embezzling $98,000 of company money on prostitutes. After consulting with the co-founder we determined the amount spent was indeed $98,000, however $12,000 of that was from his own personal income. Therefore only $86,000 of companies funds were actually used. > We rate this claim as **pants on fire**.', '>>{irwincur} : Say what you will but they are right on this one.', '>>{PuffyHerb} : Snopes is a joke though really - it tries to pass itself off as a neutral fact checker, but it\'s just another part of the liberal propaganda machine. I\'ve seen so many examples of Dems being rated ~~"half true"~~ "mixture" and yet when a Repubican says the same thing it\'ll be ~~"pants on fire"~~ "false". EDIT: changed the wording from Politifact\'s wording to Snopes wording - still stand by comments.', '>>{somas} : Is this a joke? "Pants on fire" and "Half-true" are used by Politifact not Snopes.', '>>{Destijl14} : Can you please link to one example of this?', '>>{PuffyHerb} : Whatever, they\'re both a joke. I don\'t read them anymore. Just quickly checked Snopes and I can see "True", "Unproven", "False", "Mixture".. same crap different words, who cares.', ">>{PostTruthPete} : Sounds like a Trump move. We sure he's not related?", ">>{PostTruthPete} : > I don't read them anymore. That's the spirit. Live in your bubble.", '>>{L9CockOfTheInfinite} : Uh, try reading the articles before you denigrate it.', '>>{kescusay} : No. No, he can\'t. Because he\'s just repeating a "fact" he heard from someone else.', ">>{theombudsmen} : According to Tucker Carlson's consetvative fake news platform? Those fringe right partisans hate Snopes for always calling them out on their bullshit. I'll wait for this news to hit something a bit more mainstream before buying into it.", '>>{SarcasticallyAShill} : Conservative "media" is desperate to discredit fact checkers', '>>{woolcommerce} : > I\'ve seen so many examples of Dems being rated "half true" "mixture" and yet when a Repubican says the same thing it\'ll be "pants on fire" "false". Examples? There so many, I suppose you can give them right quick.', '>>{woolcommerce} : We got to do our part. Report this as not explicitly about US politics, and downvote this garbage propaganda.', '>>{guamhascapsized} : In all fairness a random prostitute would probably do a better job fact checking than the degenerate shills/hacks that operate Snopes.', ">>{impalala} : So 17 government intelligence agencies are all on the same page and announce that Russia influenced the election and that's unbelievable without solid public evidence, but the woman suing him in what is by all accounts an incredibly nasty divorce that's been going on for years is automatically believed without any evidence at all other than her claim. Got it.", '>>{Animated_post} : Whoa, so this is how its going to begin? Call out the few fact check sites we have so Trump can lie for the next 4, 8 or who knows how many more years.', ">>{WTF_Fairy_II} : I don't know what I'm talking about but I know they're wrong because feels.", ">>{WTF_Fairy_II} : Don't bother. It's taken from divorce papers filed by his ex-wife. Because we all know bitter spouses trying to maximize their alimony is the best source of facts.", '>>{WTF_Fairy_II} : They are right in that he was accused. Now, are accusations filed in divorce papers something we should rely on? You decide.', '>>{goody_heggety} : Ho ho like Trumpistas never have bad divorce depositions.', '>>{Dzmagoon} : Absolutely - imagine what would happen if everything that was accused in divorce papers was assumed to be true. Why, someone could even be accused of marital rape!', ">>{shatfacekila} : Atleast he wasn't storing it in some off shore bank account. All of that went right back into the economy!"], ['>>{iMakeGreatDeals} : \u200bPeter Thiel: We’re Voting For Trump Because We Judge The Leadership Of Our Country To Have Failed', '>>{Kanzisbuddy} : America has been very good to him by making him rich. I suspect it\'s the ethnicity of the current occupant of the White House that is bothering him... Of course, the fact that most of Trump\'s supporters also think a "normal" America would also be homophobic isn\'t as important to him.', '>>{CNegan} : Or you\'re voting for him because he pledged to put a moratorium on financial regulation and repeal Dodd-Frank, which helps your business, but continue to pretend like you\'re doing it "for the people".', ">>{jmktimelord} : That's absurd. First of all, Obama has been blocked at every turn by an obstructionist Republican Congress refusing to do its constitutional duty. However, voting for Trump isn't going to fix that. Second, we all know Trump lacks leadership skills, offered to let his VP run everything while he was in office, and lacks the temperament to be president. How is voting for him a solution... to anything?", '>>{ME24601} : ...and we want it to fail *even more*.', '>>{Eggbertoh} : Last I knew "Leadership of our country" included Congress.', '>>{adamwho} : That is like committing suicide because you have a cold.', ">>{anon902503} : Our leaders have failed. Guess it's time to burn down the entire country and piss on the ashes! Fuck this arrogant prick.", ">>{t88m} : From the Donald's website. Glad it's not biased...", '>>{alllie} : Glad to notice that more people have noticed what an ass Thiel is.', '>>{mhwtexplode} : Every time they open their mouths out spills something else that makes my head want to...BOOM', ">>{Ms7806} : People take it as a fact that countries can't always get much worse. Things aren't looking good to some people so obviously we need ANYTHING else rather than what we have. That'll fix things.", ">>{ILikeLenexa} : I mean if you're Somalia more power to you, but people don't have any idea how bad it can get.", '>>{adamwho} : The VAST majority of these Trump voters who want to "make America great again" have never stepped outside the US and realized that America is already pretty great. What they are experiencing is alienation because their "America" (small town and generally poor) is a like a third world country compared to the more populous and educated coasts.', '>>{RealRepub} : The dumb duck repubs have failed. Global warming tax policy education healthcare. The dems built the middle class.'], [">>{glowmoss} : Omarosa: Critics will have to 'bow down' to President Trump", '>>{glowmoss} : > Former "Apprentice" star and Donald Trump supporter Omarosa Manigault predicts critics of the businessman will have to "bow down" to a President Trump. > "Every critic, every detractor, will have to bow down to President Trump," Manigault says in a trailer released Tuesday for a 2-hour Frontline PBS election special. Yikes. edit: Let us remember what President Obama said: "We don\'t look to be ruled."', '>>{GunnieGraves} : How is this bitch qualified to talk about anything?', '>>{dmb1279} : Someone tell her that her 15 minutes are long gone', ">>{uhmmaybe} : Let this sink in: She is the Trump campaign's director of African-American outreach. What the fuck...", ">>{buckeye_baker} : C'mon. Everyone has to be trolling at this point.", '>>{PersecuteHillary} : I get it now. This whole thing is about the 2017 reality TV season?', '>>{beatyatoit} : I hated her with a passion when she was on "The Apprentice" because of her "I\'m simply better than you, peon" attitude, and I hate her even more now. She quite clearly sees this as a very high risk/high reward venture. If it sinks, she goes back to whoring herself. If he wins, which at this point is very unlikely and getting more so by the hour, she will be where she wants to be; sucking the ass of someone in a position of great power.', ">>{throwmeaway69b} : If it were someone else, I'd suggest they were trying to sabotage the campaign. But she's a fucking idiot, so..", ">>{PersecuteHillary} : She's the best he could find among all three or four of his black supporters.", ">>{FatLadySingin} : I'm confused. Is she Trump's African American or is she just his *spare* African American? I seriously don't know how this works.", '>>{Isstvan82} : “If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.” ― Samuel Adams', '>>{winstonsmith7} : Bow down to one and get kicked and told to GTFO by the other. Nice choice.', ">>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : We had a revolution to get rid of people who said 'I alone can fix it!'", ">>{OptionTheThird} : Well, that's unnecessary, no matter how wrong she is.", '>>{HarlanCedeno} : I think someone is angling for a promotion to replace Katrina Pierson.......', ">>{silviazbitch} : Fuckin' A, Sam! You're the kind of guy someone should name a brewery after.", ">>{silviazbitch} : We've already established what kind of woman she is. Now we're just haggling over the price.", '>>{Isstvan82} : “Let no man thirst for good beer.” – Sam Adams', ">>{orangesarenotnasty} : She is, honestly. You've got Omarosa, Herman Cain, Ben Carson, and that Diamond and Silk duo. Of the five, Omarosa is by far the most competent.", '>>{TheLateApexLine} : Yeaaaah that\'s the ticket! **"DICTATOR DONALD"** I like it.', '>>{MODS-ARE-EVIL} : All shall bow before God-Emperor Trump or face his cheese-flavored, spray-tanned wrath!', ">>{KKKafir} : Has any of Obama's critic bowed down? If Hillary is elected, will her critics bow down?", ">>{TheLateApexLine} : When I'm lurking in The_D I'm always suspicious of the super fervent comments with excellent grammar.", ">>{waste-of-skin} : The washington post's editor in chief will have to kiss Trump's greasiest hemorrhoid.", ">>{PersecuteHillary} : and she's got an African sounding name. It worked for Obama.", ">>{wertewrtwertqw} : Yeah. On the front page of that sub right now there's a video from twitter that is supposed to show low turnout for a Clinton event but the room looked pretty full to me.", '>>{silviazbitch} : Behold the rain which descends from heaven upon our vineyards, there it enters the roots of the vines, to be changed into wine, a constant proof that God loves us, and loves to see us happy. -- Ben Franklin', '>>{theendofanerror} : This is a campaign of retribution, not progress.', ">>{PresidentChaos} : Omarosa's doing a fine job of whipping black voters into joining the Trump team!", '>>{Imnotananimalyouare} : She is director of his African American relations or something fancy like that.', '>>{HarlanCedeno} : Whatever happened to Herman Cain? I feel like he could be a real voice of reason in the party now.', '>>{orangesarenotnasty} : He goes on Fox News to yell at black people on occasion. Big Trump supporter.', ">>{ordeal123} : You're all racist for disagreeing with a black person. Bigots and racists.", '>>{cowboysfan88} : Sam Adams is a known Clinton shill! /s', '>>{TuckRaker} : Nope, because he no longer has a prayer of winning.', ">>{MC_Fap_Commander} : If he wins, they should play Motorhead's HHH theme song for the inauguration and he should wear a skull crown and spit water.", '>>{savuporo} : How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words! - Melania Trump', '>>{orangesarenotnasty} : She has described herself as a ["half-breed" like Obama] (http://www.salon.com/2016/01/25/trump_spokeswoman_stands_by_tweet_referring_to_obama_as_half_breed/) so I didn\'t include her in the list.', '>>{Isstvan82} : If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin. - Samuel Adams', '>>{Ximitar} : Once Pokémon Go got off the ground, he was never seen again. Some say he wanders the Earth this day, taking neither food nor rest, and has sworn to catch them all. There are unconfirmed reports he was seen last month in Uzbekibekibekistanstan.', ">>{mx9875} : Recently I had an exchange that made me understand that subreddit. I got into a discussion over there over a post that was coherent but in total denial of reality. And then someone PM'ed me (it was not OP, but an alt I assume) and over a few messages admitted that he and a few others have a contest going on how much karma they can gain this election cycle with batshit crazy posts over there. Post ended up with 3000+ upvotes. If I were a conspiracy type I would even think that this is why self-posts are getting karma now and reddit admins are in on this wager. Or maybe the guy who PM'ed me was fucking with me. Who knows.", ">>{Ximitar} : Yes he does. Don't take it for granted that his goose is cooked. There's three months to go, and people have disastrously short memories. He's down but not out, so don't turn your back on him, and for god's sake don't stay home on election day!", '>>{the92jays} : Omarosa is a Trump surrogate because Trump is bad at running for President.', '>>{RidleyScotch} : I believe the Trump campaigns calls it The Negro Outreach. This African-American outreach is just some liberal bias.', '>>{silviazbitch} : >"A person she has always liked is Sam Adams," the speechwriter, Meredith McIver, said of Melania Trump in a statement Wednesday from the campaign. "Over the phone, she read me some passages from Mr. Adams\'s speech as examples. I wrote them down and later included some of the phrasing in the draft that ultimately became the final speech."', ">>{EggbroHam} : Voice of reason? Tea Partier Herman Cain? You can check his twitter, he's pretty actively tweeting for Trump.", '>>{VacationAwayFromWork} : > a 2-hour Frontline PBS election special. Well this ought to be rich.', ">>{HarlanCedeno} : Yeah, I probably should've added a /s. Ah well.", ">>{GunnieGraves} : Director of Making Me Look Ok To The Coloreds. Then they have to tell him it's not ok to call them colored anymore.", ">>{sparklesinmytummy} : I thought he was trolling at the beginning of his run, then he started winning and I feared he might actually be serious, and now I'm like, no, definitely trolling.", ">>{Kaiosama} : Trump's 'African-American' liaison seems to be making in-roads in the mouth running department I see.", '>>{sparklesinmytummy} : A whole 1% of them. Great job!', ">>{historycat95} : She also said in an NPR interview that she would be using her position as a minister in black churches to campaign for Trump. But I bet no one will withdraw tax exempt status. HU: What will you be doing between now and Election Day? MANIGAULT: As a Baptist minister, I still believe in the power of the pulpit and going into black churches, going into barbershops and beauty shops, going into homes and having very intimate town halls. So I'm very excited, but I only have 100 days to get this done. NPR 7/31/16", ">>{garglemymarbles} : like he's some fucking king, right? trumpanzees don't seem to understand the US is a constitutional republic.", '>>{pgabrielfreak} : OMG I love me some Frontline! Rich indeed.', ">>{toxicroach} : I'm trying to relate to America. How about I hire another reality star who is famous for being an enormous asshole? Sounds like a plan. I need a door to door guy. Is Charles Manson available? Is he still in jail?", '>>{BedWedOrBehead} : Yeah. He told them to take my jacket.', ">>{nulledit} : God, so snarky! Take your liberal blinders off for a moment, please. All evidence shows that she's doing a *great* job for the Trump campaign keeping African-Americans [out of reach](http://insider.foxnews.com/amp/article/50817).", '>>{George_Jefferson} : Probably still working on his 9-9-9 tax plan.', '>>{Adamj1} : We gotta pardon this guy. We gotta pardon him. We need creative guys, many people are talking about it. We gotta have the creative guy pardon. Believe me, we need someone like Charlie who, like me, can think outside of the loser box. Literally sarcastically non-sarcastic tone.', ">>{Adamj1} : That name don't sound very 'murican to me. Her full name Omarosa Gaddafi Manigault?", ">>{daybreaker} : It's even worse that she's supposed to be his director of african american outreach, and she's saying people will need to bow to him.", '>>{JackOCat} : She apparently went to the Sith school of management.', ">>{MasterK999} : If you watched the season of the Apprentice she was on this starts to make more sense. She has an IQ of like 90 on a good day and is willing to do almost anything to stay in Trump's good graces. I really should not be that mean. She is not stupid as such but she has an amazing ability for self-delusion. Exactly like Trump does.", ">>{Azureknight205} : I can't believe Michael Clarke Duncan was engaged to her when he died. He seemed like a stand-up, loveable, teddy bear of a guy, while she is now the mouthpiece of a horrible, small-handed, hate spewing daughter fondler. Sad!", ">>{jibberwockie} : An African-American woman telling people that they are going to have to bow down (submit) to an arrogant white man? Have I got that right? I'm not American, but I thought you folks quite naturally stood up to these sort of threats. This isn't the America I admire.", ">>{RosemaryFocaccia} : Some people are saying that she's the vice-president of NAMBLA.", '>>{cleverusername323500} : And doing a bang up job at it, clearly.', '>>{BatCountry9} : We get karma for self-posts now? I gotta start making up shit to confess.', ">>{IamConradBlack} : And he's polling at 1%, she's doing a bang up job.", '>>{tetzy} : Ladies and Gentlemen, meet the one black person in America to vote Trump.', '>>{MiniatureBadger} : Cheeto Benito Il Douche Sad! the Impaler Rafael Trumpjillo Baby Hands Doc', '>>{LOCUTUS_OF__BORG} : Possibly the most tone deaf, idiotic thing someone has said in this campaign. SAD!']]

classify and reply

['>>{AlexNo2} : How to Fix Touch Disease on iPhone 6 Plus (No Soldering or Bending)', ">>{PM_ME_DICK_PICTURES} : Isn't this just a temporary fix? You're basically putting pressure on the IC chip so it makes contact the solder joints.", ">>{Kpc2593} : There's no need to take out the logic board. Just place the piece of folded electric tape on top of the digitizer ribbon and screw back the cover. Did this with my 6 plus and I've had no issues for 2 months now.", ">>{AlexNo2} : If it lasts the life of the phone it's a cheap fix, not a temporary fix. But only time will tell. I did this to my phone last night and thought it was worth sharing. If it does last I'd rather pay for one cent in tape than board repair or a new phone.", '>>{AlexNo2} : Damn, knowing that would have saved me a couple hours messing with tiny screws.', '>>{hirst} : how would the folded electrical tape work on the digitizer ribbon?', ">>{xshareddx} : Do you mind explaining this a little bit clearer? Isn't the digitizer ribbon unrelated to the touch IC chip? I may be wrong.", ">>{hirst} : just did this - it works! thanks so much. for those of you overwhelmed by the above video, it's really easy. open up your phone and remove the metal shield shown around 1:15 in the video. open that up, put a folded piece of electric tape there, then screw back the plate, close up the phone, and voila - you have a working phone again.", '>>{Kpc2593} : Glad to hear that! It saved me a lot of time and effort and my phone still works great!', ">>{hirst} : i actually went to go look at the pixel XL yesterday because i was fed up with my shit iphone 5. figured i'd try this out before i got a new phone - and now it's unnecessary! but once this phone dies i'm probably going to migrate to pixel because fuck apple's response to this issue."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{AlexNo2} : How to Fix Touch Disease on iPhone 6 Plus (No Soldering or Bending)', ">>{PM_ME_DICK_PICTURES} : Isn't this just a temporary fix? You're basically putting pressure on the IC chip so it makes contact the solder joints.", ">>{Kpc2593} : There's no need to take out the logic board. Just place the piece of folded electric tape on top of the digitizer ribbon and screw back the cover. Did this with my 6 plus and I've had no issues for 2 months now.", ">>{AlexNo2} : If it lasts the life of the phone it's a cheap fix, not a temporary fix. But only time will tell. I did this to my phone last night and thought it was worth sharing. If it does last I'd rather pay for one cent in tape than board repair or a new phone.", '>>{AlexNo2} : Damn, knowing that would have saved me a couple hours messing with tiny screws.', '>>{hirst} : how would the folded electrical tape work on the digitizer ribbon?', ">>{xshareddx} : Do you mind explaining this a little bit clearer? Isn't the digitizer ribbon unrelated to the touch IC chip? I may be wrong.", ">>{hirst} : just did this - it works! thanks so much. for those of you overwhelmed by the above video, it's really easy. open up your phone and remove the metal shield shown around 1:15 in the video. open that up, put a folded piece of electric tape there, then screw back the plate, close up the phone, and voila - you have a working phone again.", '>>{Kpc2593} : Glad to hear that! It saved me a lot of time and effort and my phone still works great!', ">>{hirst} : i actually went to go look at the pixel XL yesterday because i was fed up with my shit iphone 5. figured i'd try this out before i got a new phone - and now it's unnecessary! but once this phone dies i'm probably going to migrate to pixel because fuck apple's response to this issue."]]

classify and reply

['>>{sayqueensbridge} : this literally sounds like a late night show joke.', '>>{dukesims} : By Commuting Bradley Manning’s Sentence, Obama Broke Faith with the Military', '>>{mbrady} : Please update when she responds! (assuming she does...)', ">>{littlebluekid} : I will! I think she's either trying to scam or she's stupid.", '>>{erotic_majesty} : Oh no, whatever will be do for the next 16 hours?', ">>{HighAndOnline} : The military doesn't think the public has a right to know that it spys on Americans at home and murders civilians and journalists over seas? Too bad, you work for us.", ">>{ssrij} : Obviously it's a scam. Why would the AirPods come with a lightning to 3.5mm adapter? Also, the AirPods come in a case which charges it.", '>>{seanosul} : Barack Obama has called the husband of Jo Cox to offer condolences on behalf of the American people, the White House has said.', ">>{BravoTangoFoxObama} : What is the problem with her doing this? I don't get it.", ">>{ElPlywood} : just when you thought the train wreck couldn't get any more amazing, Trump drops a few dozen more boxcars and tanker cars onto it from the fucking sky", ">>{littlebluekid} : I think she's just really stupid. I think she believes they're wireless because she hasn't opened the pack yet. I can't wait for her response.", ">>{questor2k} : So,... he's trying to achieve *less* than zero percent support in the African-American community?", ">>{ScurrilousSalamander} : I bet once she opens them up and realizes how stupid she is she won't even bother replying", ">>{RN4Bernie} : Didn't the military break faith with the U.S. Citizens? Can any fucking person admit guilt in this fucking country?", ">>{irishstevenj} : Sorry, but you're going to have to at least pretend to respect Manning's gender before I listen to your half-hearted political blarbing.", ">>{KevOK80} : Why would the lightning port headphones come with an adapter from 3.5 to lightning? They're already lightning.", ">>{free_libre} : No he didn't. That's bullshit. Plenty of people in the military were sympathetic to CHELSEA's plight. That this article uses Chelsea's old name clearly indicated an anti-LGBT stance. Shameful.", '>>{leontes} : She was, by all accounts, an impressive figure. I send my condolences.', ">>{ssrij} : It's for people who want to connect their personal headphones which do not have a lightning connector (most of them do not) or want access to a 3.5mm jack for some reason.", ">>{KevOK80} : I think you missed what I'm saying. If she is dumb enough to think that they come with wireless headphones than of course she won't think twice about the adapter that comes with it. People would want the adapter for the same reason you stated regardless of if they headphones that came with it are wired or wireless.", '>>{yuhche} : You missed the chance to be little blue, kid. BST? British Summer Time, long gone!', '>>{lolnopound} : Wonder if Obama told the husband it was radical Islam or is he still too scared to say it', '>>{PM___ME___UR___VAG} : You have no idea what you\'re talking about. the killer was a far-right British man... he literally screamed "Britain first" at her as he killed her.', '>>{PM_ME_CANKLES} : Republicans love transgender people. They can only get away with dog whistles now when it comes to the gays and the blacks, so this is their only outlet for no-holds-barred bigotry. Also, if articles are getting pulled for calling Assange a coward, they sure as shit should get pulled for calling her Bradley.', '>>{wytxcook} : > "I just spent an amazing weekend with African Americans for Trump, about 300 of them," she said. "I\'m just wondering who they called because those numbers would be flawed according to the people who have come out to support, had an amazing faith-based service yet with African-Americans who support Donald Trump, had an amazing reception yesterday evening with African-Americans who support Trump. So I look at the data, but my reality is that I\'m surrounded by people who to want see Donald Trump as the next president of the United States, who are African-American."', ">>{nolivesmatterCthulhu} : Manning was no hero the objective wasn't to inform the public but because of a personal vendetta against the military. The only reason Obama helped manning and not snowden is because Manning made Bush look bad while Snowden made Obama look bad this is all political theatre nothing more.", '>>{lolnopound} : Britain First is also the slogan of ISIS\'s European front. Take over "Britain First" then the world. But you won\'t read that in the leftist media.', ">>{WesternPhilosophy} : Republicans are no longer the party of family values. Remind me again upon which moral rock does the National Review stand on? I'd love to know. It surely isn't a wistful interpretation of the Bible, that's for damn sure.", ">>{voompanatos} : If a general changes the mission of his forces, that's awesome command, control, and leadership. But if President Obama as commander-in-chief changes the sentence of a convicted soldier, that's somehow breaking faith with the entire military. Got it. /s", '>>{tmc_throwaway} : The murderer is a white neo-nazi. In court today he gave his name as "Death to Traitors, Freedom for Britain".', ">>{littlebluekid} : UPDATE!! She replied. She's still stupid! #1 https://imgur.com/a/w7W4c #2 https://imgur.com/a/ye5FY #3 https://imgur.com/a/dhug1 #4 https://imgur.com/a/knfds #5 https://imgur.com/a/JPQPa She deleted the post.", ">>{PM___ME___UR___VAG} : You really have no fucking clue what you're talking about. her killer is a neo-Nazi.", ">>{Spicy_Clam_Sandwich} : Except eyewitnesses at the scene said he didn't say that at all.", ">>{ShadyPollster} : Maybe they think it's not her turn. Extremely sexist IMHO.", ">>{PM___ME___UR___VAG} : He is still a white neo Nazi, so my point still stands even if he didn't say that.", ">>{lolnopound} : The neo-nazi's killed Jews and not muslims for a reason. The holocaust was a Muslim fight over Palestine", ">>{ShadyPollster} : He'll nuke it soon m8) This train has NO BRAKES.", '>>{seanosul} : > Wonder if Obama told the husband it was radical Islam or is he still too scared to say it It was dumb con terrorism, the kind promoted by the likes of Pamela Geller.', ">>{lordfredericknorth} : Alternate headline: Trump's one black friend named Director of Finding Trump More Black Friends", ">>{irishstevenj} : No, I just know that someone who isn't acknowledging Manning's gender isn't likely to lead to a particularly compelling discussion.", '>>{cheefjustice} : That\'s a misconception. The media breathlessly report every new poll that goes against the prevailing narrative because they\'re hungry for news... but the race has actually been extremely stable for the past 2 months. Check out [Princeton Election Consortium\'s "meta-margin" tracker](http://election.princeton.edu/). It\'s hardly changed at all since early May. And PEC reported today that > As measured via state polls, the Presidential race shows Hillary Clinton slightly ahead of where Barack Obama was at this point in 2008 and 2012. State polls, BTW, are the most reliable barometer... PEC has the best track record of any forecaster of predicting presidential and congressional races since 2004 (including the outcomes of individual states).', '>>{eximil} : It\'s more that (in my opinion) the position of "Director of African-American outreach" is laughable coming from this candidate regardless of whom he appoints.', '>>{seanosul} : > Maybe he should call a wounded vet Like this http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3628472/Obama-posts-video-ten-tour-wounded-U-S-Afghanistan-veteran-inspires-anniversary-D-Day.html', '>>{voompanatos} : More people used to recognize the strength and courage needed to do that. Manning did it. But folks who recognize that are being out-shouted by I-was-born-right, never-wrong double-downers.', '>>{emtielo} : The media are currently reporting that multiple witnesses claim he did say it, while others say they didn\'t hear anything. It has now emerged that he was involved with multiple far-right organizations (including an American neo-Nazi group and a South African pro-apartheid group), and that his house is full of Nazi memorabilia. In his first court appearance, when asked to confirm his name, he said "My name is death to traitors, freedom for Britain." He didn\'t say anything else. This would all seem to suggest that the eyewitnesses might have been telling the truth. So how come so many people on reddit are *still* desperate to push the narrative that he is not a far-right activist, and even suggesting without any evidence at all that he is somehow a Muslim? It\'s almost as if there is some kind of agenda here.', '>>{ShadyPollster} : But he needs outreach... Seems natural he would appoint someone to assist him.', '>>{HBombthrow} : Clinton\'s director of African American Outreach was Secretary of Diverse Affairs in student government, practiced law, served as Executive Director of the Congressional Black Caucus, and served as Director of Regional and Federal Affairs for the DC mayor\'s office. Trump\'s is a reality TV star he "fired" for acting crazy.', ">>{eximil} : Yes he does, and best of luck to her. I doubt she'll be very effective, not based on any of her skills, just based on the candidate she's representing.", '>>{seanosul} : [Here he is not being in Britain First](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-_RT8sCqtB9M/V2Uda32UmkI/AAAAAAAABo8/hbqx-f1jTZgiypj4na5GgVHntITHlvsdgCLcB/s1600/Britain%2BFirst%2BThomas%2BMair.png), he is just doing the polite English thing and helping them hold a sign.', '>>{SaltHash} : >Are your feelings hurt? Clearly, it is the NRO right-wingers who have the hurt feelings because they refuse to correctly identify Chelsea Manning.', '>>{Mr_Titicaca} : Haha ask your president elect about his feelings. The dude bitches like a pussy about everything.', ">>{Spicy_Clam_Sandwich} : > It's almost as if there is some kind of agenda here. Oh my, the irony.", '>>{suseu} : Well, she... >Omarosa worked in the office of then-Vice President Al Gore during the Clinton Administration as a scheduling correspondent so yeah, nothing. But hey, its not government position, why not hold attacks after her potential failure?', '>>{emtielo} : > Britain First is also the slogan of ISIS\'s European front. Take over "Britain First" then the world. But you won\'t read that in the leftist media. I googled and couldn\'t find any reference to this in the alt-right media either. I did find an article from a crappy right-wing newspaper with a supposed map of the places ISIS want to target in Europe, but it just seemed to be a map of historically Muslim-controlled regions, like Spain and the Balkans. So, congratulations. This story was very creative and *almost* plausible. I bet they would have believed it in /r/the_donald (when are you guys going to be quarantined again?).', '>>{BravoTangoFoxObama} : Sounds like "establishment" which is what Trump has tried to avoid when possible.', ">>{Drgntrnr} : I like correcting obvious assholes that call her Bradley or use he, when you know they're using it intentionally. Sends them into a flying rage", ">>{SarcasticallyAShill} : I think Manning deserved to serve more than 6 years, but less than 35. But I don't feel like my all time favorite Commander in Chief broke faith with me, my friends, or my profession.", '>>{seanosul} : No need to worry, he was one of yours, he told the police he was a political activist. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jun/18/jo-cox-murder-suspect-thomas-mair-told-police-he-was-political-activist?CMP=share_btn_tw', '>>{HBombthrow} : I mean, "establishment" is one way to say "qualified for the job you are doing." I\'ve been going to "establishment" dentists for years, for instance.', '>>{AgoraiosBum} : Ah, in the pocket of Big Tooth, eh?', ">>{ClubSoda} : That's because that's what he has revealed himself to be.", '>>{fitzroy95} : > Too bad, you work for us. Legally correct, factually incorrect. The military works for the oligarchs who own the media and the politicians, and who profit so handsomely from warmongering. The public has zero say in their wars, their profiteering, their growing international body counts or the constantly ballooning military budgets.', '>>{Spicy_Clam_Sandwich} : >"...one of yours..." How\'s that?', '>>{Spicy_Clam_Sandwich} : I\'m by no means "conservative", as it seems to be understood these days. But that\'s cool, assumptions away!', '>>{phil_mckraken} : I thought she was in charge of Transgendered outreach. So confused.', ">>{ZeCoolerKing} : Just curious, is there such thing as a moderate conservative to people who think like you do? Now, I've heard of far, far right conservatives but these moderate conservatives are like unicorns it seems."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{sayqueensbridge} : this literally sounds like a late night show joke.', ">>{BravoTangoFoxObama} : What is the problem with her doing this? I don't get it.", ">>{ElPlywood} : just when you thought the train wreck couldn't get any more amazing, Trump drops a few dozen more boxcars and tanker cars onto it from the fucking sky", ">>{questor2k} : So,... he's trying to achieve *less* than zero percent support in the African-American community?", '>>{wytxcook} : > "I just spent an amazing weekend with African Americans for Trump, about 300 of them," she said. "I\'m just wondering who they called because those numbers would be flawed according to the people who have come out to support, had an amazing faith-based service yet with African-Americans who support Donald Trump, had an amazing reception yesterday evening with African-Americans who support Trump. So I look at the data, but my reality is that I\'m surrounded by people who to want see Donald Trump as the next president of the United States, who are African-American."', ">>{ShadyPollster} : Maybe they think it's not her turn. Extremely sexist IMHO.", ">>{ShadyPollster} : He'll nuke it soon m8) This train has NO BRAKES.", ">>{lordfredericknorth} : Alternate headline: Trump's one black friend named Director of Finding Trump More Black Friends", '>>{cheefjustice} : That\'s a misconception. The media breathlessly report every new poll that goes against the prevailing narrative because they\'re hungry for news... but the race has actually been extremely stable for the past 2 months. Check out [Princeton Election Consortium\'s "meta-margin" tracker](http://election.princeton.edu/). It\'s hardly changed at all since early May. And PEC reported today that > As measured via state polls, the Presidential race shows Hillary Clinton slightly ahead of where Barack Obama was at this point in 2008 and 2012. State polls, BTW, are the most reliable barometer... PEC has the best track record of any forecaster of predicting presidential and congressional races since 2004 (including the outcomes of individual states).', '>>{eximil} : It\'s more that (in my opinion) the position of "Director of African-American outreach" is laughable coming from this candidate regardless of whom he appoints.', '>>{ShadyPollster} : But he needs outreach... Seems natural he would appoint someone to assist him.', '>>{HBombthrow} : Clinton\'s director of African American Outreach was Secretary of Diverse Affairs in student government, practiced law, served as Executive Director of the Congressional Black Caucus, and served as Director of Regional and Federal Affairs for the DC mayor\'s office. Trump\'s is a reality TV star he "fired" for acting crazy.', ">>{eximil} : Yes he does, and best of luck to her. I doubt she'll be very effective, not based on any of her skills, just based on the candidate she's representing.", '>>{suseu} : Well, she... >Omarosa worked in the office of then-Vice President Al Gore during the Clinton Administration as a scheduling correspondent so yeah, nothing. But hey, its not government position, why not hold attacks after her potential failure?', '>>{BravoTangoFoxObama} : Sounds like "establishment" which is what Trump has tried to avoid when possible.', '>>{HBombthrow} : I mean, "establishment" is one way to say "qualified for the job you are doing." I\'ve been going to "establishment" dentists for years, for instance.', '>>{AgoraiosBum} : Ah, in the pocket of Big Tooth, eh?', ">>{ClubSoda} : That's because that's what he has revealed himself to be.", '>>{phil_mckraken} : I thought she was in charge of Transgendered outreach. So confused.'], ['>>{seanosul} : Barack Obama has called the husband of Jo Cox to offer condolences on behalf of the American people, the White House has said.', '>>{leontes} : She was, by all accounts, an impressive figure. I send my condolences.', '>>{lolnopound} : Wonder if Obama told the husband it was radical Islam or is he still too scared to say it', '>>{PM___ME___UR___VAG} : You have no idea what you\'re talking about. the killer was a far-right British man... he literally screamed "Britain first" at her as he killed her.', '>>{lolnopound} : Britain First is also the slogan of ISIS\'s European front. Take over "Britain First" then the world. But you won\'t read that in the leftist media.', '>>{tmc_throwaway} : The murderer is a white neo-nazi. In court today he gave his name as "Death to Traitors, Freedom for Britain".', ">>{PM___ME___UR___VAG} : You really have no fucking clue what you're talking about. her killer is a neo-Nazi.", ">>{Spicy_Clam_Sandwich} : Except eyewitnesses at the scene said he didn't say that at all.", ">>{PM___ME___UR___VAG} : He is still a white neo Nazi, so my point still stands even if he didn't say that.", ">>{lolnopound} : The neo-nazi's killed Jews and not muslims for a reason. The holocaust was a Muslim fight over Palestine", '>>{seanosul} : > Wonder if Obama told the husband it was radical Islam or is he still too scared to say it It was dumb con terrorism, the kind promoted by the likes of Pamela Geller.', '>>{seanosul} : > Maybe he should call a wounded vet Like this http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3628472/Obama-posts-video-ten-tour-wounded-U-S-Afghanistan-veteran-inspires-anniversary-D-Day.html', '>>{emtielo} : The media are currently reporting that multiple witnesses claim he did say it, while others say they didn\'t hear anything. It has now emerged that he was involved with multiple far-right organizations (including an American neo-Nazi group and a South African pro-apartheid group), and that his house is full of Nazi memorabilia. In his first court appearance, when asked to confirm his name, he said "My name is death to traitors, freedom for Britain." He didn\'t say anything else. This would all seem to suggest that the eyewitnesses might have been telling the truth. So how come so many people on reddit are *still* desperate to push the narrative that he is not a far-right activist, and even suggesting without any evidence at all that he is somehow a Muslim? It\'s almost as if there is some kind of agenda here.', '>>{seanosul} : [Here he is not being in Britain First](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-_RT8sCqtB9M/V2Uda32UmkI/AAAAAAAABo8/hbqx-f1jTZgiypj4na5GgVHntITHlvsdgCLcB/s1600/Britain%2BFirst%2BThomas%2BMair.png), he is just doing the polite English thing and helping them hold a sign.', ">>{Spicy_Clam_Sandwich} : > It's almost as if there is some kind of agenda here. Oh my, the irony.", '>>{emtielo} : > Britain First is also the slogan of ISIS\'s European front. Take over "Britain First" then the world. But you won\'t read that in the leftist media. I googled and couldn\'t find any reference to this in the alt-right media either. I did find an article from a crappy right-wing newspaper with a supposed map of the places ISIS want to target in Europe, but it just seemed to be a map of historically Muslim-controlled regions, like Spain and the Balkans. So, congratulations. This story was very creative and *almost* plausible. I bet they would have believed it in /r/the_donald (when are you guys going to be quarantined again?).', '>>{seanosul} : No need to worry, he was one of yours, he told the police he was a political activist. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jun/18/jo-cox-murder-suspect-thomas-mair-told-police-he-was-political-activist?CMP=share_btn_tw', '>>{Spicy_Clam_Sandwich} : >"...one of yours..." How\'s that?', '>>{Spicy_Clam_Sandwich} : I\'m by no means "conservative", as it seems to be understood these days. But that\'s cool, assumptions away!', ">>{ZeCoolerKing} : Just curious, is there such thing as a moderate conservative to people who think like you do? Now, I've heard of far, far right conservatives but these moderate conservatives are like unicorns it seems."], ['>>{mbrady} : Please update when she responds! (assuming she does...)', ">>{littlebluekid} : I will! I think she's either trying to scam or she's stupid.", ">>{ssrij} : Obviously it's a scam. Why would the AirPods come with a lightning to 3.5mm adapter? Also, the AirPods come in a case which charges it.", ">>{littlebluekid} : I think she's just really stupid. I think she believes they're wireless because she hasn't opened the pack yet. I can't wait for her response.", ">>{ScurrilousSalamander} : I bet once she opens them up and realizes how stupid she is she won't even bother replying", ">>{KevOK80} : Why would the lightning port headphones come with an adapter from 3.5 to lightning? They're already lightning.", ">>{ssrij} : It's for people who want to connect their personal headphones which do not have a lightning connector (most of them do not) or want access to a 3.5mm jack for some reason.", ">>{KevOK80} : I think you missed what I'm saying. If she is dumb enough to think that they come with wireless headphones than of course she won't think twice about the adapter that comes with it. People would want the adapter for the same reason you stated regardless of if they headphones that came with it are wired or wireless.", '>>{yuhche} : You missed the chance to be little blue, kid. BST? British Summer Time, long gone!', ">>{littlebluekid} : UPDATE!! She replied. She's still stupid! #1 https://imgur.com/a/w7W4c #2 https://imgur.com/a/ye5FY #3 https://imgur.com/a/dhug1 #4 https://imgur.com/a/knfds #5 https://imgur.com/a/JPQPa She deleted the post."], ['>>{dukesims} : By Commuting Bradley Manning’s Sentence, Obama Broke Faith with the Military', '>>{erotic_majesty} : Oh no, whatever will be do for the next 16 hours?', ">>{HighAndOnline} : The military doesn't think the public has a right to know that it spys on Americans at home and murders civilians and journalists over seas? Too bad, you work for us.", ">>{RN4Bernie} : Didn't the military break faith with the U.S. Citizens? Can any fucking person admit guilt in this fucking country?", ">>{irishstevenj} : Sorry, but you're going to have to at least pretend to respect Manning's gender before I listen to your half-hearted political blarbing.", ">>{free_libre} : No he didn't. That's bullshit. Plenty of people in the military were sympathetic to CHELSEA's plight. That this article uses Chelsea's old name clearly indicated an anti-LGBT stance. Shameful.", '>>{PM_ME_CANKLES} : Republicans love transgender people. They can only get away with dog whistles now when it comes to the gays and the blacks, so this is their only outlet for no-holds-barred bigotry. Also, if articles are getting pulled for calling Assange a coward, they sure as shit should get pulled for calling her Bradley.', ">>{nolivesmatterCthulhu} : Manning was no hero the objective wasn't to inform the public but because of a personal vendetta against the military. The only reason Obama helped manning and not snowden is because Manning made Bush look bad while Snowden made Obama look bad this is all political theatre nothing more.", ">>{WesternPhilosophy} : Republicans are no longer the party of family values. Remind me again upon which moral rock does the National Review stand on? I'd love to know. It surely isn't a wistful interpretation of the Bible, that's for damn sure.", ">>{voompanatos} : If a general changes the mission of his forces, that's awesome command, control, and leadership. But if President Obama as commander-in-chief changes the sentence of a convicted soldier, that's somehow breaking faith with the entire military. Got it. /s", ">>{irishstevenj} : No, I just know that someone who isn't acknowledging Manning's gender isn't likely to lead to a particularly compelling discussion.", '>>{voompanatos} : More people used to recognize the strength and courage needed to do that. Manning did it. But folks who recognize that are being out-shouted by I-was-born-right, never-wrong double-downers.', '>>{SaltHash} : >Are your feelings hurt? Clearly, it is the NRO right-wingers who have the hurt feelings because they refuse to correctly identify Chelsea Manning.', '>>{Mr_Titicaca} : Haha ask your president elect about his feelings. The dude bitches like a pussy about everything.', ">>{Drgntrnr} : I like correcting obvious assholes that call her Bradley or use he, when you know they're using it intentionally. Sends them into a flying rage", ">>{SarcasticallyAShill} : I think Manning deserved to serve more than 6 years, but less than 35. But I don't feel like my all time favorite Commander in Chief broke faith with me, my friends, or my profession.", '>>{fitzroy95} : > Too bad, you work for us. Legally correct, factually incorrect. The military works for the oligarchs who own the media and the politicians, and who profit so handsomely from warmongering. The public has zero say in their wars, their profiteering, their growing international body counts or the constantly ballooning military budgets.']]

classify and reply

['>>{SteveBannonEXPOSED} : Vice Admiral Robert Harward turns down national security adviser job', ">>{ailboles} : It's like he knows that being involved with Trump will be career ending or something.", ">>{SteveBannonEXPOSED} : Sources close to the situation told Garrett Harward and the administration had a dispute over over staffing the security council. Two sources close to the situation confirm Harward Harward demanded his own team, and the White House resisted. Specifically, Mr. Trump told Deputy National Security Adviser K. T. McFarland that she could retain her post, even after the ouster of National Security Adviser Michael Flynn. Harward refused to keep McFarland as his deputy, and after a day of negotiations over this and other staffing matters, Harward declined to serve as Flynn’s replacement. Because a Fox News talking head wants to keep her status as deputy, a respected person won't be the NSA.", '>>{doubleplusuntruth} : Because he knows he would just be a figurehead. Bannon pulls all the strings there.', '>>{ep29} : Congrats Donnie, you now the ugly girl at the dance.', ">>{DaveCrockett} : How long until he can't get anyone to work with him? Seems it's happening already. Who wants to board a sinking ship?", '>>{WmPitcher} : I would like the current administration to implode, but I am afraid it would take us all with it. So, I want good people -- particularly in National Security as a counter weight. The fact the Admiral turned down the job makes me think he is one of the good ones. Edit: typo', ">>{TJ_McWeaksauce} : Isn't Donald supposed to be the best at negotiating, though?", '>>{hmmm_} : Mr President, I must turn down your generous offer to fly me out to meet the Titanic at sea.', ">>{ThatAssholeMrWhite} : You don't fuck with chain-of-command. You tell your subordinates what to do, not how to do it. Refusing to allow Harward to choose his own staff is a sign that Trump will continue to micromanage the military, which is something they complained about during the Obama administration.", '>>{SteveBannonEXPOSED} : Jake Tapper confirms: A friend of Harward\'s says he was reluctant to take NSA job bc the WH seems so chaotic; says Harward called the offer a "shit sandwich."', '>>{Boombollie} : Not with a fucking ten foot pole. Its lonely up there, eh Donny?']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{SteveBannonEXPOSED} : Vice Admiral Robert Harward turns down national security adviser job', ">>{ailboles} : It's like he knows that being involved with Trump will be career ending or something.", ">>{SteveBannonEXPOSED} : Sources close to the situation told Garrett Harward and the administration had a dispute over over staffing the security council. Two sources close to the situation confirm Harward Harward demanded his own team, and the White House resisted. Specifically, Mr. Trump told Deputy National Security Adviser K. T. McFarland that she could retain her post, even after the ouster of National Security Adviser Michael Flynn. Harward refused to keep McFarland as his deputy, and after a day of negotiations over this and other staffing matters, Harward declined to serve as Flynn’s replacement. Because a Fox News talking head wants to keep her status as deputy, a respected person won't be the NSA.", '>>{doubleplusuntruth} : Because he knows he would just be a figurehead. Bannon pulls all the strings there.', '>>{ep29} : Congrats Donnie, you now the ugly girl at the dance.', ">>{DaveCrockett} : How long until he can't get anyone to work with him? Seems it's happening already. Who wants to board a sinking ship?", '>>{WmPitcher} : I would like the current administration to implode, but I am afraid it would take us all with it. So, I want good people -- particularly in National Security as a counter weight. The fact the Admiral turned down the job makes me think he is one of the good ones. Edit: typo', ">>{TJ_McWeaksauce} : Isn't Donald supposed to be the best at negotiating, though?", '>>{hmmm_} : Mr President, I must turn down your generous offer to fly me out to meet the Titanic at sea.', ">>{ThatAssholeMrWhite} : You don't fuck with chain-of-command. You tell your subordinates what to do, not how to do it. Refusing to allow Harward to choose his own staff is a sign that Trump will continue to micromanage the military, which is something they complained about during the Obama administration.", '>>{SteveBannonEXPOSED} : Jake Tapper confirms: A friend of Harward\'s says he was reluctant to take NSA job bc the WH seems so chaotic; says Harward called the offer a "shit sandwich."', '>>{Boombollie} : Not with a fucking ten foot pole. Its lonely up there, eh Donny?']]

classify and reply

['>>{speckz} : The Roccat Sova lapboard. For sofa PC gamers.', '>>{JThoms} : So they charge 200 for a plastic board that holds a keyboard with some sort of awkward mechanical switches with enough space for your mouse. 149 for the membrane board. Seems more like paying for the brand name.', ">>{sysadminbj} : I use a shelf that I pulled out of my entertainment center when I needed to make space. It's perfect. My keyboard and mouse /mousepad fit, and I didn't fucking pay $200 for it.", '>>{sbcontt} : It is sad how they are using a DeathAdder for the demo instead of their own product.', '>>{Akkuma} : I cannot believe it took them two years to make this garbage. The original design talked about a truly configurable design and IIRC was going to be wireless. Their definition of configurable is change wrist pad/mousepad materials.', '>>{Phrost5019} : Gonna take a guess and say he was talking about roccat.', ">>{Ree81} : I'm a sofa PC gamer, but that thing doesn't have a high enough WAF, wife acceptance factor for me. :( Sofa PC users are mostly adults, so why is it designed for 15-year olds in mind?", ">>{Terryfrankkratos2} : [You can make this on your own for $35](http://i.imgur.com/UhFCYwV.png) and it's wireless while the $200 one isn't.", ">>{cmatechno} : I don't know what kind of games they think you can play, because true hardcore gamers need a lot more than a mouse pad and a small keyboard.", ">>{JRPGpro} : It's a board that you put your own shit into. It's for right handed players only. It's costs 119$ and doesn't come with a keyboard or mouse. It only fits two models of corsair keyboards. It's shit"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{speckz} : The Roccat Sova lapboard. For sofa PC gamers.', '>>{JThoms} : So they charge 200 for a plastic board that holds a keyboard with some sort of awkward mechanical switches with enough space for your mouse. 149 for the membrane board. Seems more like paying for the brand name.', ">>{sysadminbj} : I use a shelf that I pulled out of my entertainment center when I needed to make space. It's perfect. My keyboard and mouse /mousepad fit, and I didn't fucking pay $200 for it.", '>>{sbcontt} : It is sad how they are using a DeathAdder for the demo instead of their own product.', '>>{Akkuma} : I cannot believe it took them two years to make this garbage. The original design talked about a truly configurable design and IIRC was going to be wireless. Their definition of configurable is change wrist pad/mousepad materials.', '>>{Phrost5019} : Gonna take a guess and say he was talking about roccat.', ">>{Ree81} : I'm a sofa PC gamer, but that thing doesn't have a high enough WAF, wife acceptance factor for me. :( Sofa PC users are mostly adults, so why is it designed for 15-year olds in mind?", ">>{Terryfrankkratos2} : [You can make this on your own for $35](http://i.imgur.com/UhFCYwV.png) and it's wireless while the $200 one isn't.", ">>{cmatechno} : I don't know what kind of games they think you can play, because true hardcore gamers need a lot more than a mouse pad and a small keyboard.", ">>{JRPGpro} : It's a board that you put your own shit into. It's for right handed players only. It's costs 119$ and doesn't come with a keyboard or mouse. It only fits two models of corsair keyboards. It's shit"]]

classify and reply

['>>{TrumpsHair_} : Yes. Donald Trump is the worst candidate in american history. The new american fascist.', '>>{ChipAyten} : The ACA sucks for everyone in the 30-49k earnings range. Too rich for subsidies, too poor to buy private insurance outright.', '>>{Shiari_The_Wanderer} : See, we told you that if we do everything in our power to make the law not work, and do nothing but launch disinformation campaigns and actively fight it as HARD as possible, it wouldn\'t work! -The GOP Here\'s a message from America, GOP. We didn\'t want this to begin with. This was our compromise, with you, to effectively take what YOU flouted as a great health care proposition (It used to be called "RomneyCare") You fought it tooth and nail for 6 years, so you know what? Now we\'re going to ram single payer down your throat. Deal with it.', ">>{youngthugstan} : Is this H.A. Goodman's new shtick?", '>>{WatchingDonFail} : A new poll shows that registered voters are evenly split, at 46-to-46 percent, on whether they “support” or “oppose” impeaching Trump. Just two weeks ago, the pro-impeachment figure was 35 percent. Since inauguration, more than 800,000 people have signed a petition in the first stage of the Impeach Donald Trump Now campaign, which will soon involve grassroots organizing in congressional districts around the country.', '>>{ShreddedChedder} : The idea that Obamacare was a "compromise" with the GOP is ridiculous. Obama made no effort to bring in Republicans into the writing of the bill, basically held one conference with Republicans (which he talked down to John McCain in) about Obamacare just to have it turn into a glorified photo-op where Obama tried to paint the GOP as the bad guys to rally his base, and wound up going not just against every Republican representative but a solid majority of Americans to pass the bill.', ">>{ozabelle} : the aca was the gop's own plan. it was the gop alternative to clinton health reform. this is in the public record, and newt admitted as much.", '>>{pramoni} : Chinese proverb, Lao Tzu said, "The journey of a thousand miles begins with one step." Remember Alexander Butterfield!', ">>{GonzoNation} : The Road to Perdition: *I saw then that my father's only fear was that his son would follow the same road.* Don't worry. We've found a short cut! *May you get impeached an hour before the Devil knows you're gone* Donald: So when do I get my share of the money? Trump Sr.: Well... how much do you want? Donald: Ten billion dollars. Trump Sr: Okay. Deal. Donald: Could I have had more? Trump Sr: You'll never know.", '>>{ChipAyten} : Just like with Amtrak the feckless politicians are too pussy to say this program is 100% public and your taxes are going up. Nope, they have to create some frankenstein monster that appeases both sides and is useless', '>>{GonzoNation} : Nope: Norman Solomon is the author of a dozen books including War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.', '>>{King__Midas__} : I love that there is a new "here\'s how Trump will be impeached" story everyday. Surely this is not the boy who cried wolf.', ">>{nowheybra} : The Republicans made it clear that they would not do healthcare reform, period. Grassley said as much when Obama asked him. Their plan from his first month in office and the stimulus has been absolute opposition, don't try to rewrite history.", ">>{Gold_Jacobson} : Hopefully Clinton can pass something that mitigates that. Because yeah, it's a bad hole.", '>>{turtledan87} : This is the new version of trying to flip electors lol, /r/politics last brilliant plan', '>>{1Glitch0} : This is smart. Get the petition and once you have enough people mobilize. Just signed myself.', ">>{ozabelle} : there's huge money in health care, so big forces against change. cuba offered to send doctors and dentists to rural america, to provide free care. and cuba could do it, too. we turned them down.", '>>{onod32} : [Yay!](https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--OGdpeDym--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/dhf93rpaf51x7prbcq2i.gif) Seriously though, congrats for finding this little subversive procedure. I’d also like the House Dems to seriously look into crafting discharge petitions when necessary, and seeing how many GOP defectors they can get to support them on issues. They need to start exploiting whatever little loopholes a minority party can exploit to at least hold this administration responsible. Trump is only useful to the GOP Congress insofar as he’s not irreparably damaged. So, don’t go around telling people that it’s impossible if shit comes out about him to not get significant GOP defections in both houses. Even more than that, he’s not only beholden to Congress whether he realizes it or not, but he’ll only be useful to the Russians for so long. If they ever start singing because he stops playing ball or complicates their plans with his shitty, unpredictable personality, it’s over. And, let’s be clear, Presidents and there administrations have been impeached or threatened with the process for far less. If there is a god, we will soon have proof at the very least that Flynn is a fucking treasonous crook at the very least. So, yeah. I want us nipping at this administration’s heels every. single. day. of it existence, and hopefully, that existence is short-lived.', ">>{BACK_BURNER} : Article barely even discusses [Nadler's Resolution](http://nadler.house.gov/press-release/congressman-nadler-introduces-resolution-inquiry-force-gop-vote-trump%E2%80%99s-conflicts), so I guess I won't either. Instead, I will glance at one of the members of the [House Committee on the Judiciary](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Committee_on_the_Judiciary#115th_Congress): Andy Biggs. A freshman Representative from Arizona's 5th district, he won his seat by 27 votes. Before that, he worked in the Arizona State Legislature. Fun Fact: in 1992, he won $10 million from the American Family Sweepstakes. He has introduced [HR-250](https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/250/text), which would remove Arizona and several other states from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, and place them in a new 12th Circuit. It is co-sponsored by the other 4 Republican Representatives from Arizona. Please note that none of the 4 Democratic Representatives from Arizona have attached themselves, and so far neither have any Representatives from the other states the bill would ~~affect~~ ~~effect~~ impact. EDIT: Possibly [effect](https://www.vocabulary.com/articles/chooseyourwords/affect-effect/). I'm not sure.", '>>{damifynoU} : Biggs is also part of the bill/effort to dismantle the department of education...along with Chaffetz', '>>{wavescrashover} : Precisely. So many members of the GOP are in bed with guys like the Koch brothers, the organization ALEC, healthcare insurance companies & hospital execs. They added changes to the bill to meet their needs, not the needs of Americans. If he could have gotten Obamacare through the way he wanted it, things would have been much better.', '>>{oldmrdeebs} : Counting the days until this orange fuckin nightmare is over.', ">>{WrathfulClarity} : >single payer What's the cost of real estate in fantasy land?", ">>{thx1138jr} : I hope I can work but not hopeful. Americans need to shut country down by not working, paying bills and standing in the streets till they drive him and the other morons out. Won't happen but the thought feels great.", ">>{StarterPackWasteland} : Not for the insurance companies who'll have 0 competition in a market of millions for a product people are so desperate to get that they'll mop out their bank accounts, IRAs if they've got em, give up the roof over their heads to buy treatment for a loved one. Those CEOs are going to get some sweet bonuses next year!", '>>{Uniqueusername121} : So....Obamacare wrote a law obliging people to pay for insurance to a private company or pay a fine... yet failed to put a provision in that law to force the insurance companies to provide the service?', ">>{TheBatmanIRL} : Not gonna happen. I hope it does but I just can't see it happening.", ">>{Sip_of_Sunshine} : Once all of the unpopular legislation on the Republican agenda had been passed, he'll be gone", ">>{buddhabelly138} : Why can't people see the good he's doing for our country? He's keeping potential terrorists out of our country, keeping illegal immigrants out of our country, and has brought over 40,000 jobs to the American people!", ">>{Uniqueusername121} : Not really. The problem all along was making sure the private insurance companies kept their monopolies by forcing people to buy insurance from them, with no limits on what prices could be charged nor what services should be covered. Not to mention the insurance companies that are pulling out STILL had record breaking profits last year, although Obamacare was a loser for them, they made up for it elsewhere. Why use the middleman at all? Insurance companies made billions of dollars off Obamacare when that money could have gone straight to providers. Lastly, gridlock is not only R's fault. Many Dems are receiving campaign money from these insurance companies, and their motives are no purer than R's. The name of the game is to perpetuate the gridlock so the corporations continue -to give money to Congress members- to run the government. It's straight up fascism, and we are living it."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{youngthugstan} : Is this H.A. Goodman's new shtick?", '>>{WatchingDonFail} : A new poll shows that registered voters are evenly split, at 46-to-46 percent, on whether they “support” or “oppose” impeaching Trump. Just two weeks ago, the pro-impeachment figure was 35 percent. Since inauguration, more than 800,000 people have signed a petition in the first stage of the Impeach Donald Trump Now campaign, which will soon involve grassroots organizing in congressional districts around the country.', '>>{pramoni} : Chinese proverb, Lao Tzu said, "The journey of a thousand miles begins with one step." Remember Alexander Butterfield!', ">>{GonzoNation} : The Road to Perdition: *I saw then that my father's only fear was that his son would follow the same road.* Don't worry. We've found a short cut! *May you get impeached an hour before the Devil knows you're gone* Donald: So when do I get my share of the money? Trump Sr.: Well... how much do you want? Donald: Ten billion dollars. Trump Sr: Okay. Deal. Donald: Could I have had more? Trump Sr: You'll never know.", '>>{GonzoNation} : Nope: Norman Solomon is the author of a dozen books including War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.', '>>{King__Midas__} : I love that there is a new "here\'s how Trump will be impeached" story everyday. Surely this is not the boy who cried wolf.', '>>{turtledan87} : This is the new version of trying to flip electors lol, /r/politics last brilliant plan', '>>{1Glitch0} : This is smart. Get the petition and once you have enough people mobilize. Just signed myself.', '>>{onod32} : [Yay!](https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--OGdpeDym--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/dhf93rpaf51x7prbcq2i.gif) Seriously though, congrats for finding this little subversive procedure. I’d also like the House Dems to seriously look into crafting discharge petitions when necessary, and seeing how many GOP defectors they can get to support them on issues. They need to start exploiting whatever little loopholes a minority party can exploit to at least hold this administration responsible. Trump is only useful to the GOP Congress insofar as he’s not irreparably damaged. So, don’t go around telling people that it’s impossible if shit comes out about him to not get significant GOP defections in both houses. Even more than that, he’s not only beholden to Congress whether he realizes it or not, but he’ll only be useful to the Russians for so long. If they ever start singing because he stops playing ball or complicates their plans with his shitty, unpredictable personality, it’s over. And, let’s be clear, Presidents and there administrations have been impeached or threatened with the process for far less. If there is a god, we will soon have proof at the very least that Flynn is a fucking treasonous crook at the very least. So, yeah. I want us nipping at this administration’s heels every. single. day. of it existence, and hopefully, that existence is short-lived.', ">>{BACK_BURNER} : Article barely even discusses [Nadler's Resolution](http://nadler.house.gov/press-release/congressman-nadler-introduces-resolution-inquiry-force-gop-vote-trump%E2%80%99s-conflicts), so I guess I won't either. Instead, I will glance at one of the members of the [House Committee on the Judiciary](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Committee_on_the_Judiciary#115th_Congress): Andy Biggs. A freshman Representative from Arizona's 5th district, he won his seat by 27 votes. Before that, he worked in the Arizona State Legislature. Fun Fact: in 1992, he won $10 million from the American Family Sweepstakes. He has introduced [HR-250](https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/250/text), which would remove Arizona and several other states from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, and place them in a new 12th Circuit. It is co-sponsored by the other 4 Republican Representatives from Arizona. Please note that none of the 4 Democratic Representatives from Arizona have attached themselves, and so far neither have any Representatives from the other states the bill would ~~affect~~ ~~effect~~ impact. EDIT: Possibly [effect](https://www.vocabulary.com/articles/chooseyourwords/affect-effect/). I'm not sure.", '>>{damifynoU} : Biggs is also part of the bill/effort to dismantle the department of education...along with Chaffetz', '>>{oldmrdeebs} : Counting the days until this orange fuckin nightmare is over.', ">>{thx1138jr} : I hope I can work but not hopeful. Americans need to shut country down by not working, paying bills and standing in the streets till they drive him and the other morons out. Won't happen but the thought feels great.", ">>{TheBatmanIRL} : Not gonna happen. I hope it does but I just can't see it happening.", ">>{Sip_of_Sunshine} : Once all of the unpopular legislation on the Republican agenda had been passed, he'll be gone", ">>{buddhabelly138} : Why can't people see the good he's doing for our country? He's keeping potential terrorists out of our country, keeping illegal immigrants out of our country, and has brought over 40,000 jobs to the American people!"], ['>>{TrumpsHair_} : Yes. Donald Trump is the worst candidate in american history. The new american fascist.', '>>{ChipAyten} : The ACA sucks for everyone in the 30-49k earnings range. Too rich for subsidies, too poor to buy private insurance outright.', '>>{Shiari_The_Wanderer} : See, we told you that if we do everything in our power to make the law not work, and do nothing but launch disinformation campaigns and actively fight it as HARD as possible, it wouldn\'t work! -The GOP Here\'s a message from America, GOP. We didn\'t want this to begin with. This was our compromise, with you, to effectively take what YOU flouted as a great health care proposition (It used to be called "RomneyCare") You fought it tooth and nail for 6 years, so you know what? Now we\'re going to ram single payer down your throat. Deal with it.', '>>{ShreddedChedder} : The idea that Obamacare was a "compromise" with the GOP is ridiculous. Obama made no effort to bring in Republicans into the writing of the bill, basically held one conference with Republicans (which he talked down to John McCain in) about Obamacare just to have it turn into a glorified photo-op where Obama tried to paint the GOP as the bad guys to rally his base, and wound up going not just against every Republican representative but a solid majority of Americans to pass the bill.', ">>{ozabelle} : the aca was the gop's own plan. it was the gop alternative to clinton health reform. this is in the public record, and newt admitted as much.", '>>{ChipAyten} : Just like with Amtrak the feckless politicians are too pussy to say this program is 100% public and your taxes are going up. Nope, they have to create some frankenstein monster that appeases both sides and is useless', ">>{nowheybra} : The Republicans made it clear that they would not do healthcare reform, period. Grassley said as much when Obama asked him. Their plan from his first month in office and the stimulus has been absolute opposition, don't try to rewrite history.", ">>{Gold_Jacobson} : Hopefully Clinton can pass something that mitigates that. Because yeah, it's a bad hole.", ">>{ozabelle} : there's huge money in health care, so big forces against change. cuba offered to send doctors and dentists to rural america, to provide free care. and cuba could do it, too. we turned them down.", '>>{wavescrashover} : Precisely. So many members of the GOP are in bed with guys like the Koch brothers, the organization ALEC, healthcare insurance companies & hospital execs. They added changes to the bill to meet their needs, not the needs of Americans. If he could have gotten Obamacare through the way he wanted it, things would have been much better.', ">>{WrathfulClarity} : >single payer What's the cost of real estate in fantasy land?", ">>{StarterPackWasteland} : Not for the insurance companies who'll have 0 competition in a market of millions for a product people are so desperate to get that they'll mop out their bank accounts, IRAs if they've got em, give up the roof over their heads to buy treatment for a loved one. Those CEOs are going to get some sweet bonuses next year!", '>>{Uniqueusername121} : So....Obamacare wrote a law obliging people to pay for insurance to a private company or pay a fine... yet failed to put a provision in that law to force the insurance companies to provide the service?', ">>{Uniqueusername121} : Not really. The problem all along was making sure the private insurance companies kept their monopolies by forcing people to buy insurance from them, with no limits on what prices could be charged nor what services should be covered. Not to mention the insurance companies that are pulling out STILL had record breaking profits last year, although Obamacare was a loser for them, they made up for it elsewhere. Why use the middleman at all? Insurance companies made billions of dollars off Obamacare when that money could have gone straight to providers. Lastly, gridlock is not only R's fault. Many Dems are receiving campaign money from these insurance companies, and their motives are no purer than R's. The name of the game is to perpetuate the gridlock so the corporations continue -to give money to Congress members- to run the government. It's straight up fascism, and we are living it."]]

classify and reply

['>>{LastDawnOfMan} : There is literally nothing anyone could say that would change the mind of someone who still is planning to vote for Trump at this point.', '>>{anon902503} : Those votes were never up for grabs. This is about locking in the votes from the swing suburbs in the first week of early voting.', '>>{wytxcook} : > Newsweek has promised to release a major cover story about Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump on Wednesday that its author says “could change the dialogue about this election season.” Not likely. Liberal writers/journalists have been exceedingly bad this cycle.', '>>{JumpingJazzJam} : Were those liberal writers/journalists the people who declared Hillary dead and replaced by a body double?', '>>{WarPhalange} : Change how? It would have to be a story of Trump saving the baby of a dead war hero during 9/11 at ground zero to change the election for him. Do you really expect that from that man?', ">>{hollywoodhank} : No, it won't. Nothing said or done will dissuade Trump supporters, just as nothing he says will persuade non-supporters.", '>>{makeitproductive} : Didn\'t Huffington post just recently have a story with the title "If you\'re not voting Democrat this November Fuck You!" ?', ">>{wytxcook} : No, and the dialogue about the campaign season hasn't focused on body doubles. Her campaign did put out a hilarious play by play on PEPE the Nazi frog, following up her deranged racist rant a few weeks ago, and her deplorables gaffe. It's pretty sad really, she's a mess.", ">>{stephersms} : You know how I know you didn't read the article?...", ">>{SargeantSasquatch} : Kinda like how Assange keeps saying he'll change the election?", '>>{eyebeeleaf} : You mean to say they are already in the basket?', ">>{DOG_BUTT_JESUS} : Exactly! It's not about the flaws of your candidate it's about the flaws of the other candidate. Both sides are so deeply entrenched that nothing will dissuade them from voting for their candidate. Nothing!", ">>{LicensedShill} : This is surely the end of Trump's campaign, says increasingly nervous media for 50th time.", ">>{savage_as_vandal} : [mfw i've been labeled a basket dweller on Reddit and I don't even like Trump](https://i.redd.it/32tf8dwm5pkx.jpg)", '>>{basket_of_adorables} : I\'m guessing they\'ve got jack shit if they\'re "teasing" it.', '>>{rpgmarvin} : This is just the start, Next week a sex scandal, trump has too much dirt hidden.', '>>{_themgt_} : Eichenwald arguably has the chops to have done some serious investigative reporting. At the same time, the phrase "deep ties to global financiers, foreign politicians and even criminals" could quite easily be applied to the Clintons as well. [His twitter feed](https://twitter.com/kurteichenwald) overall and specifically [this](https://twitter.com/CorbinReiff/status/775799753678389248) make me seriously question whether this is someone with too much of an axe to grind, to take his "change the election" comments at face value.', '>>{anon902503} : No, the deplorables are the ones that are not up for grabs.', '>>{uncertainpath} : Some people are locked in one way or another, but there are people who change their minds and are more on the fence. I have seen it.', ">>{uncertainpath} : This story reminds me of the cure for cancer stuff you see in futurology. I'll believe that there is a cure for Trump when the magazine article comes out. otherwise don't was my time", '>>{lolatawp} : Trump eats controversy and shits votes. The media will never understand this.', '>>{SistaSabuda} : Newsweek - Clinton spin peddlers >In other words, this widely held belief that Clinton and Powell were emailing information classified as top-secret on personal accounts is hooey. http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-email-scandal-not-scandal-464414 Pieces like this Trump one are simply there to give those left-wing extremists one more fix of feel-good though ignoring reality. They just need to keep the lies going until the unquestioning faithful cast their vote. Food for thought- https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1473816605487.png', '>>{blatherskiter} : Assange has said for a long time that the bombshells are coming in October.', ">>{FriesWithThat} : Part of me is hoping that there's something new and specific and antithetical to everything his base believes in. For instance, it would be fun to find out that while Trump is 'against the TPP', he has already in-place something called the Trump Pacific Partnership. Just speculating, of course, hard to know anything about a candidate without seeing their tax returns first.", ">>{the92jays} : It's not about supporters. It's about the undecided voters.", '>>{SargeantSasquatch} : He\'s never said anything along the lines of "bombshells." Only the media has.', ">>{lolatawp} : >although there is no evidence the Trump Organization has engaged in any illegal activities. Literally nothing to see. It'll be a heady think piece about financials and potential conflicts of interest and no one will care. Its Trumps version of the Clinton Foundation. People will still be talking about Hillarys apparently failing health next week. They won't be talking about this.", ">>{alphabets00p} : What does the latest leak change? Everyone knows, or should know, that the best ambassadorships are reserved for close allies (plus, that stuff is on Obama, not Clinton). The Powell emails benefit no one and are weirdly gossipy. I haven't seen anything else newsworthy but I guess it's still coming in. The leaks always have a major overblown impact as everyone breathlessly searches for a scoop and the slow drip of of info we know we shouldn't be allowed to see gives an air of deviousness that isn't always warranted. Just because a bunch of passionate autists and partisans on the Internet are making hay of it tonight doesn't mean it will or should get a lot of play in the MSM tomorrow. We'll see.", '>>{Dhsjzj} : Rumor going around Trump was hospitalized in the 90s for Mental Breakdown.', '>>{Agastopia} : I see zero reason how this effects the content of the article.', ">>{FriesWithThat} : Interesting enough, Trump has a cure for cancer that he'll share with us if he wins the election.", ">>{alphabets00p} : Trump has earned a thousand enemies among the journalists of New York. Eichenwald is unabashedly anti-Trump this election, but that doesn't diminish whatever facts he may have uncovered.", ">>{uncertainpath} : It's the best cure for cancer and you are going to love it. People really you are going to love it.", ">>{NoNewsizBadnews} : Off topic question: what's with using 'folks' all the time? Is this some kind of thing Trump did so let's beat it into the ground?", ">>{pissbum-emeritus} : [HOW DARE YOU!](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christian-gabriel/if-you-dont-vote-democrat_b_10425968.html) The piece is over the top cringe-worthy. More so than HuffPo's usual flatulence. It's the perfect material for a dramatic reading after a few snorts of strong drink. Enjoy.", '>>{Bernerberry} : although there is no evidence the Trump Organization has engaged in any illegal activities Kind of a key point there.', '>>{CTR_OWNS_R-POLITICS} : The one that has Respected Collin calling Drumpf a National Disgrace?', '>>{Bluecheesemmmm} : No doubt some will vote for Trump who are ashamed to admit it.', '>>{SargeantSasquatch} : It was a while back that we should have stopped paying attention to Trump, and started paying attention to who was still listening to him.', '>>{pissbum-emeritus} : Authored by Elizabeth Chan, who touts herself on Twitter as "Politics + pop culture". Unfortunately she\'s as hip to pop culture as a Presto Log. Her \'explanation\' is written with the same air of authority as the newscasters who were seeking \'the hacker 4chan\'. It\'s hilarious when read as satire. Otherwise it\'s just more misinformation from Clinton\'s propaganda mill.', ">>{IAmSmellingLikeARose} : As does Clinton. Have you not noticed how the advantage keeps shifting between the two candidates. Right now you're seeing all the Clinton allies blowing their October surprises in September hoping to flip last week's disaster on its head. It'll flip again and again until they're dead even the night before the election.", '>>{IAmSmellingLikeARose} : I thought you were talking about HRC supporters for a second.', '>>{VonnegutIce9} : He is like a used car salesman with an endless supply of cocaine.', '>>{pete_sens} : no sense in bringing up key points here...back to racist cartoon frogs', '>>{lipsyncforyourlife} : The deplorables are people that will vote for Trump no matter what', '>>{sentesy} : Yes, the author of the article tweeted it then deleted the tweet.', '>>{rPolModsEqualDogshit} : They will expose ties to various bad people and countries around the world and not any illegal activities. Then the same worthless Hillary drones who have been saying there is no issue with the Clinton Foundation will be screaming from the rooftops about how horrible and bad this all is.', ">>{Kissing_Toast} : Seriously. Trump's corruption is out there in plain sight for everybody to see. Nobody gives a shit.", '>>{oldoneeyed} : I really don\'t understand why people think this. I grew up around conservative types. They don\'t give a shit about impressing liberals. The "silent majority" is and always has been loud, obnoxious, and full of itself', '>>{oldoneeyed} : >As does Clinton Whatever "dirt" is on Clinton has already been "exposed". People have been going after her and Bill relentlessly for 30 years. That\'s just straight truth. Whatever you can possibly say about the Clintons has been said.', '>>{oldoneeyed} : Assange also said in 2010 he would "bring down a bank or two". Still waiting on that.', ">>{oldoneeyed} : Honestly, if this election isn't proof the man is insane then I doubt a doctor's note would make much difference", ">>{oldoneeyed} : CF criticisms are 99% baseless paranoia, forgive me for being skeptical whenever that crap comes up. I've been told the Clinton Foundation is involved in everything from drug smuggling to funding terrorism to tax dodging and everything in between. It's fucking stupid.", ">>{oldoneeyed} : Clinton's a rich lady with a long history in government and was America's top diplomat. ***NO SHIT SHE KNOWS RICH PEOPLE AND FOREIGN POLITICIANS***", ">>{oldoneeyed} : Trump flip flops all the time, the base doesn't care. He openly lies, gets caught lying, and they still think he's trustworthy. Fact is he makes them feel good about themselves. That's pretty much it. He calls cretins like them great and everybody else subhuman. And they love him for it. He lets them feel proud even though they have objectively nothing to be proud of in their ignorant, meaningless, lives. Insecurity is a prerequisite for being an authoritarian, let's be clear here.", ">>{Jeptic} : Yes, I'd take some of that action and supersize the fries to go", '>>{SargeantSasquatch} : Only the "racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, or Islamaphobic" ones.', ">>{oldoneeyed} : Journalists are anti-trump because unlike the rest of the public, they actually know what he is and what he's saying. The people working the trump beat at America's newspapers know the cheeto better than he knows himself at this point. These people have been consuming literally every single solitary bit of information about him nonstop for the past year. Only a complete dumbass thinks journalists are uninformed. They know *exactly* what Trump is offering America. And they're understandably repulsed by it and baffled that their country is okay with this no matter what he says and does.", '>>{Jeptic} : Yup. Pretty much. Plus I want to believe the article may not have a smoking gun but will be taking a stab at a different perspective work information already in hand', '>>{oldoneeyed} : >People will still be talking about Hillarys apparently failing health next week. Doubt it. The pundits can\'t keep talking about that shit over and over again for a week. They need to move on to the next thing. And Americans, being ignorant lemmings devoid of all independent thought, will move on to the next bullshit "controversy" just like they always do. This election has proven, conclusively, that the American people are idiots. I hope everyone understands that. Children have a longer attention span then the American voter.', ">>{DesertedPenguin} : Ethical issues are still a major component of presidential campaigns. Why else do you think everyone is focused on the disclosure of Clinton's health?", ">>{alphabets00p} : I follow hundreds of political journalists on Twitter. This is true and there's a ton of internal debate about what they're doing wrong in conveying the seriousness of Trump's unfitness to the public. They're not in the business to be biased and they're not in the business to sell one candidate over the other but by and large they are disturbed by what they see from Trump and how he treats them and their profession and that takes a toll on how they cover him. They'll keep doing what they can but they can't make people pay attention.", '>>{rob_banks} : Hilary look like she was up for grabs in that video of her getting Ragdoll into that van', ">>{StillPlaysFlappyBird} : Whether it's politics or anything else, I really wish announcements of announcements would stop being a thing.", ">>{IAmSmellingLikeARose} : We didn't know she had pneumonia until 2 days ago. Surely you jest?", '>>{oldoneeyed} : The go to republican excuse for their faults for the past few decades has been to blame the media for "biased reporting". If they fuck up, if something they don\'t like happens, if they lose any battle whatsoever, it\'s not them, it\'s the press. That\'s how they see it. Now the republican base literally doesn\'t believe in anything the media says and just chooses to invent its own reality. Truth is, like always, a victim of politics.', ">>{CreepyStickGuy} : No, they are just really good at covering it up and or lying. Bill didn't have sexual relations with that women until he did. They are just too big to fail at this point, and people have been taking fire for them for years.", '>>{oldoneeyed} : The fact that they keep getting caught lying is itself proof that they suck at lying. So no, they aren\'t "good at it". Truth is there just isn\'t nearly as much there as right wingers want to believe. They\'re average washington. After years of the last Clinton presidency the worst thing the republicans could find on him was him fucking Lewinsky. Clinton had multiple hearings on Benghazi and she humiliated the committee members. Sit back and honestly consider all this for a minute.', ">>{timmyjj3} : Because there's lots of polling that suggests it's true.", '>>{Torncano} : Is it that he has Parkinsons disease? Then both candidates would have it!', ">>{timmyjj3} : I'm honestly curious if you think Hillary's corruption is not even more obvious and more disgusting to a lot of people?", ">>{Bluecheesemmmm} : I totally disagree. People change their spoken opinions all the time depending on who they are speaking to or around. Would you admit you've never done this yourself? In at least to save ass not face? It's no different from religious views. Sometimes its well worth the acrobatics or biting of the tounge depending on the social setting. People do it everyday, if not for anything else but to hold privacy sacred. The genius of the crowd, get what i a m saying?", '>>{oldoneeyed} : Oh yeah? There\'s lots of polling that says a lot of shit. It\'s a fucking stupid notion. But go ahead. Show me this "polling". Republicans have been playing this "silent majority" card for decades and it has always been complete bullshit. Wingnuts are never silent. And Trump\'s only reliable demographic is wingnuts.', ">>{Torncano} : No one trusts them. If they wanted Trump gone they should have endorsed him. They don't understand that most people see them as biased propagandists.", ">>{oldoneeyed} : So has everything Trump has said the past fucking year. Doesn't seem to matter much in the big scheme of things. America is going to move on to the next round of bullshit in a week.", ">>{Kissing_Toast} : Yeah, I do think that. Is she flawless? No. But she's never bribed an Attorney General or scammed people out of thousands of dollars with a University.", ">>{oldoneeyed} : >People change their spoken opinions all the time depending on who they are speaking to or around Conservative white people don't give a fuck. They never have. >Would you admit you've never done this yourself? In at least to save ass not face? Oh please. You're assuming republicans have shame and a concept of sociability. They don't. I", '>>{CreepyStickGuy} : they are not average washington. No one else has an impeachment under their belt. Biden is average washington. Benghazi is pointless and for show, I\'ll give you that. The issues with Lewinsky wasn\'t that he actually did it, its that he lied about it under oath. The fact that he did that should make anyone worried about his and (by extension in some people\'s minds) her integrity. I\'m talking about the \'mysterious deaths\' surrounding them, the fact that Comey came out and said "she really fucked up and this is negligence, but meh, its fine," the non-action in Rawana, the issues in the Balkans, or any of the other actual bad things they have done that no one really brings up.', ">>{IAmSmellingLikeARose} : You can't shake pneumonia in a week let alone before the first debate. If it is pneumonia.", ">>{lolatawp} : People like gossip. There's still lots of interest in the story of a powerful world leader who may or may not be knocking on deaths door. That's a story that has staying power. A story about dubious financial dealings has no staying power unless they found that Trump is somehow funding ISIS, or is wholly funding Hillarys campaign or something equally outlandish.", ">>{agentup} : There's lots of Republicans out there voting blindly or near blindly for Trump. Meaning they just assume he's gonna lower taxes and focus on big and small business improvements. What hillary can do is show that don the con isn't actually in it for the middle class. He has a pattern of suing, discriminating, and stiffing the people he does business with. If hillary can make these republicans see that a man who bribes attorneys and pays for paintings of himself with charity money isn't motivated or fit enough to implement a standard republican platform. She'll win by a landslide. Frustrating thing for me is trump supporters say he'll make America great. Do all this economy hocus pocus. Be a hardass on our enemies. Give us so many freedoms. But the actual on the record things Trumps done paints the picture of a total con artist. A man who would sell Springfield a monorail", ">>{oldoneeyed} : Pneumonia usually clears up in about a week or two. So actually you can. By that time she'll be over the worst of it, at any rate. But that's besides the point that Americans are idiots with short attention spans and will forget this just like they forget everything else.", '>>{oldoneeyed} : >they are not average washington. Trust me, they are. The place is a hive of scum and villainy. >I\'m talking about the \'mysterious deaths\' surrounding them This is bullshit conspiracy theory and I laugh at you for buying into it. What\'s your source? Fucking Breitbart? Last I checked Roger Stone isn\'t dead and he\'s a target they actually probably do want to kill. >the fact that Comey came out and said "she really fucked up and this is negligence, but meh, its fine, Her fucking up isn\'t the same as her committing a crime, much as you would like to believe that. > the non-action in Rawana, You know what\'s hilarious? People hate them for being interventionist, and then get mad at them for not doing anything in Rwanda.', ">>{CreepyStickGuy} : > I laugh at you for buying into it. You are basically proving my point. The fact that people won't even acknowledge that fact that it might be true (which is why I put it in quotations, because I don't know if it is true) and instead you laugh at me and call me a conspiracy theorist. This is the kind of non-questioning mentality people have been sold because it might make them sound 'crazy.' You prove my point by responding like this. I don't know if they actually did it or not, no one does, but I'm not simple enough to believe they wouldn't or counldn't do something like this. At the end of the day, it isn't even a discussion or a question even though lots of people have died around them. It is just suspicious is all. > Her fucking up isn't the same as her committing a crime I never said I thought it was a crime. > get mad at them for not doing anything in Rwanda. Very different. Rwanda would not have been them intervening in overthrowing a governmental power, it would be them intervening to stop a genocide by neighbors rising up against neighbors simply because of race. Its the lack of consistency that bothers me. The American government is fine with Darfur but not fine with Saddam in Iraq.", ">>{chi-hi} : When you think about it early voting isn't that great", '>>{SonofMan87} : This is the nut graf: >It also reveals a web of contractual entanglements that could not just be canceled. If Trump moves into the White House and his family continues to receive any benefit from the company, during or even after his presidency, almost every foreign policy decision he makes will raise serious conflicts of interest and ethical quagmires.', ">>{Red_Nudist_Jaguars} : Later today I'll reply here to say if I agree with this statement or not.", '>>{jacksonstew} : Straight out of Idiocracy: "If you don\'t smoke Tarryltons, Fuck you!" This is an incredibly narrow and childish article.', ">>{AlphaCygni} : He reposted it because he wrote it such that people thought the mental breakdown story was coming out today. The mental breakdown story isn't yet fully developed, but apparently it happened back in 1990. If you look at what happened in 1990 to Trump is not surprising.", '>>{Bluecheesemmmm} : That was quite an emotional response, sorry you misunderstood. I was talking about people in general, not conservatives. Slow down and try reading a little more carefully.', ">>{LastDawnOfMan} : Its the essence of the demogog: tell big lies, provide little or no detail, appeal to the gullible, desperate, ignorant, or greedy. It's just like when any other scam artist gets a hold of someone and promises to fulfill their dreams. The victim defends the scam harder than anyone, until after their money is all gone and they have nothing to show for it.", '>>{LastDawnOfMan} : I don\'t think the support for Hillary is as desperate and intense as it is for Trump. She\'s not the one telling big lies about all the ludicrous things she\'s going to fix magically, so she doesn\'t draw the delusional and desperate like Trump does. With her, it\'s just rational people saying, "things will probably be similar to what they are now, at least, instead of a giant flaming disaster."', '>>{JumpingJazzJam} : Oh I think the body double story is much bigger.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{LastDawnOfMan} : There is literally nothing anyone could say that would change the mind of someone who still is planning to vote for Trump at this point.', '>>{anon902503} : Those votes were never up for grabs. This is about locking in the votes from the swing suburbs in the first week of early voting.', '>>{wytxcook} : > Newsweek has promised to release a major cover story about Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump on Wednesday that its author says “could change the dialogue about this election season.” Not likely. Liberal writers/journalists have been exceedingly bad this cycle.', '>>{JumpingJazzJam} : Were those liberal writers/journalists the people who declared Hillary dead and replaced by a body double?', '>>{WarPhalange} : Change how? It would have to be a story of Trump saving the baby of a dead war hero during 9/11 at ground zero to change the election for him. Do you really expect that from that man?', ">>{hollywoodhank} : No, it won't. Nothing said or done will dissuade Trump supporters, just as nothing he says will persuade non-supporters.", '>>{makeitproductive} : Didn\'t Huffington post just recently have a story with the title "If you\'re not voting Democrat this November Fuck You!" ?', ">>{wytxcook} : No, and the dialogue about the campaign season hasn't focused on body doubles. Her campaign did put out a hilarious play by play on PEPE the Nazi frog, following up her deranged racist rant a few weeks ago, and her deplorables gaffe. It's pretty sad really, she's a mess.", ">>{stephersms} : You know how I know you didn't read the article?...", ">>{SargeantSasquatch} : Kinda like how Assange keeps saying he'll change the election?", '>>{eyebeeleaf} : You mean to say they are already in the basket?', ">>{DOG_BUTT_JESUS} : Exactly! It's not about the flaws of your candidate it's about the flaws of the other candidate. Both sides are so deeply entrenched that nothing will dissuade them from voting for their candidate. Nothing!", ">>{LicensedShill} : This is surely the end of Trump's campaign, says increasingly nervous media for 50th time.", ">>{savage_as_vandal} : [mfw i've been labeled a basket dweller on Reddit and I don't even like Trump](https://i.redd.it/32tf8dwm5pkx.jpg)", '>>{basket_of_adorables} : I\'m guessing they\'ve got jack shit if they\'re "teasing" it.', '>>{rpgmarvin} : This is just the start, Next week a sex scandal, trump has too much dirt hidden.', '>>{_themgt_} : Eichenwald arguably has the chops to have done some serious investigative reporting. At the same time, the phrase "deep ties to global financiers, foreign politicians and even criminals" could quite easily be applied to the Clintons as well. [His twitter feed](https://twitter.com/kurteichenwald) overall and specifically [this](https://twitter.com/CorbinReiff/status/775799753678389248) make me seriously question whether this is someone with too much of an axe to grind, to take his "change the election" comments at face value.', '>>{anon902503} : No, the deplorables are the ones that are not up for grabs.', '>>{uncertainpath} : Some people are locked in one way or another, but there are people who change their minds and are more on the fence. I have seen it.', ">>{uncertainpath} : This story reminds me of the cure for cancer stuff you see in futurology. I'll believe that there is a cure for Trump when the magazine article comes out. otherwise don't was my time", '>>{lolatawp} : Trump eats controversy and shits votes. The media will never understand this.', '>>{SistaSabuda} : Newsweek - Clinton spin peddlers >In other words, this widely held belief that Clinton and Powell were emailing information classified as top-secret on personal accounts is hooey. http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-email-scandal-not-scandal-464414 Pieces like this Trump one are simply there to give those left-wing extremists one more fix of feel-good though ignoring reality. They just need to keep the lies going until the unquestioning faithful cast their vote. Food for thought- https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1473816605487.png', '>>{blatherskiter} : Assange has said for a long time that the bombshells are coming in October.', ">>{FriesWithThat} : Part of me is hoping that there's something new and specific and antithetical to everything his base believes in. For instance, it would be fun to find out that while Trump is 'against the TPP', he has already in-place something called the Trump Pacific Partnership. Just speculating, of course, hard to know anything about a candidate without seeing their tax returns first.", ">>{the92jays} : It's not about supporters. It's about the undecided voters.", '>>{SargeantSasquatch} : He\'s never said anything along the lines of "bombshells." Only the media has.', ">>{lolatawp} : >although there is no evidence the Trump Organization has engaged in any illegal activities. Literally nothing to see. It'll be a heady think piece about financials and potential conflicts of interest and no one will care. Its Trumps version of the Clinton Foundation. People will still be talking about Hillarys apparently failing health next week. They won't be talking about this.", ">>{alphabets00p} : What does the latest leak change? Everyone knows, or should know, that the best ambassadorships are reserved for close allies (plus, that stuff is on Obama, not Clinton). The Powell emails benefit no one and are weirdly gossipy. I haven't seen anything else newsworthy but I guess it's still coming in. The leaks always have a major overblown impact as everyone breathlessly searches for a scoop and the slow drip of of info we know we shouldn't be allowed to see gives an air of deviousness that isn't always warranted. Just because a bunch of passionate autists and partisans on the Internet are making hay of it tonight doesn't mean it will or should get a lot of play in the MSM tomorrow. We'll see.", '>>{Dhsjzj} : Rumor going around Trump was hospitalized in the 90s for Mental Breakdown.', '>>{Agastopia} : I see zero reason how this effects the content of the article.', ">>{FriesWithThat} : Interesting enough, Trump has a cure for cancer that he'll share with us if he wins the election.", ">>{alphabets00p} : Trump has earned a thousand enemies among the journalists of New York. Eichenwald is unabashedly anti-Trump this election, but that doesn't diminish whatever facts he may have uncovered.", ">>{uncertainpath} : It's the best cure for cancer and you are going to love it. People really you are going to love it.", ">>{NoNewsizBadnews} : Off topic question: what's with using 'folks' all the time? Is this some kind of thing Trump did so let's beat it into the ground?", ">>{pissbum-emeritus} : [HOW DARE YOU!](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christian-gabriel/if-you-dont-vote-democrat_b_10425968.html) The piece is over the top cringe-worthy. More so than HuffPo's usual flatulence. It's the perfect material for a dramatic reading after a few snorts of strong drink. Enjoy.", '>>{Bernerberry} : although there is no evidence the Trump Organization has engaged in any illegal activities Kind of a key point there.', '>>{CTR_OWNS_R-POLITICS} : The one that has Respected Collin calling Drumpf a National Disgrace?', '>>{Bluecheesemmmm} : No doubt some will vote for Trump who are ashamed to admit it.', '>>{SargeantSasquatch} : It was a while back that we should have stopped paying attention to Trump, and started paying attention to who was still listening to him.', '>>{pissbum-emeritus} : Authored by Elizabeth Chan, who touts herself on Twitter as "Politics + pop culture". Unfortunately she\'s as hip to pop culture as a Presto Log. Her \'explanation\' is written with the same air of authority as the newscasters who were seeking \'the hacker 4chan\'. It\'s hilarious when read as satire. Otherwise it\'s just more misinformation from Clinton\'s propaganda mill.', ">>{IAmSmellingLikeARose} : As does Clinton. Have you not noticed how the advantage keeps shifting between the two candidates. Right now you're seeing all the Clinton allies blowing their October surprises in September hoping to flip last week's disaster on its head. It'll flip again and again until they're dead even the night before the election.", '>>{IAmSmellingLikeARose} : I thought you were talking about HRC supporters for a second.', '>>{VonnegutIce9} : He is like a used car salesman with an endless supply of cocaine.', '>>{pete_sens} : no sense in bringing up key points here...back to racist cartoon frogs', '>>{lipsyncforyourlife} : The deplorables are people that will vote for Trump no matter what', '>>{sentesy} : Yes, the author of the article tweeted it then deleted the tweet.', '>>{rPolModsEqualDogshit} : They will expose ties to various bad people and countries around the world and not any illegal activities. Then the same worthless Hillary drones who have been saying there is no issue with the Clinton Foundation will be screaming from the rooftops about how horrible and bad this all is.', ">>{Kissing_Toast} : Seriously. Trump's corruption is out there in plain sight for everybody to see. Nobody gives a shit.", '>>{oldoneeyed} : I really don\'t understand why people think this. I grew up around conservative types. They don\'t give a shit about impressing liberals. The "silent majority" is and always has been loud, obnoxious, and full of itself', '>>{oldoneeyed} : >As does Clinton Whatever "dirt" is on Clinton has already been "exposed". People have been going after her and Bill relentlessly for 30 years. That\'s just straight truth. Whatever you can possibly say about the Clintons has been said.', '>>{oldoneeyed} : Assange also said in 2010 he would "bring down a bank or two". Still waiting on that.', ">>{oldoneeyed} : Honestly, if this election isn't proof the man is insane then I doubt a doctor's note would make much difference", ">>{oldoneeyed} : CF criticisms are 99% baseless paranoia, forgive me for being skeptical whenever that crap comes up. I've been told the Clinton Foundation is involved in everything from drug smuggling to funding terrorism to tax dodging and everything in between. It's fucking stupid.", ">>{oldoneeyed} : Clinton's a rich lady with a long history in government and was America's top diplomat. ***NO SHIT SHE KNOWS RICH PEOPLE AND FOREIGN POLITICIANS***", ">>{oldoneeyed} : Trump flip flops all the time, the base doesn't care. He openly lies, gets caught lying, and they still think he's trustworthy. Fact is he makes them feel good about themselves. That's pretty much it. He calls cretins like them great and everybody else subhuman. And they love him for it. He lets them feel proud even though they have objectively nothing to be proud of in their ignorant, meaningless, lives. Insecurity is a prerequisite for being an authoritarian, let's be clear here.", ">>{Jeptic} : Yes, I'd take some of that action and supersize the fries to go", '>>{SargeantSasquatch} : Only the "racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, or Islamaphobic" ones.', ">>{oldoneeyed} : Journalists are anti-trump because unlike the rest of the public, they actually know what he is and what he's saying. The people working the trump beat at America's newspapers know the cheeto better than he knows himself at this point. These people have been consuming literally every single solitary bit of information about him nonstop for the past year. Only a complete dumbass thinks journalists are uninformed. They know *exactly* what Trump is offering America. And they're understandably repulsed by it and baffled that their country is okay with this no matter what he says and does.", '>>{Jeptic} : Yup. Pretty much. Plus I want to believe the article may not have a smoking gun but will be taking a stab at a different perspective work information already in hand', '>>{oldoneeyed} : >People will still be talking about Hillarys apparently failing health next week. Doubt it. The pundits can\'t keep talking about that shit over and over again for a week. They need to move on to the next thing. And Americans, being ignorant lemmings devoid of all independent thought, will move on to the next bullshit "controversy" just like they always do. This election has proven, conclusively, that the American people are idiots. I hope everyone understands that. Children have a longer attention span then the American voter.', ">>{DesertedPenguin} : Ethical issues are still a major component of presidential campaigns. Why else do you think everyone is focused on the disclosure of Clinton's health?", ">>{alphabets00p} : I follow hundreds of political journalists on Twitter. This is true and there's a ton of internal debate about what they're doing wrong in conveying the seriousness of Trump's unfitness to the public. They're not in the business to be biased and they're not in the business to sell one candidate over the other but by and large they are disturbed by what they see from Trump and how he treats them and their profession and that takes a toll on how they cover him. They'll keep doing what they can but they can't make people pay attention.", '>>{rob_banks} : Hilary look like she was up for grabs in that video of her getting Ragdoll into that van', ">>{StillPlaysFlappyBird} : Whether it's politics or anything else, I really wish announcements of announcements would stop being a thing.", ">>{IAmSmellingLikeARose} : We didn't know she had pneumonia until 2 days ago. Surely you jest?", '>>{oldoneeyed} : The go to republican excuse for their faults for the past few decades has been to blame the media for "biased reporting". If they fuck up, if something they don\'t like happens, if they lose any battle whatsoever, it\'s not them, it\'s the press. That\'s how they see it. Now the republican base literally doesn\'t believe in anything the media says and just chooses to invent its own reality. Truth is, like always, a victim of politics.', ">>{CreepyStickGuy} : No, they are just really good at covering it up and or lying. Bill didn't have sexual relations with that women until he did. They are just too big to fail at this point, and people have been taking fire for them for years.", '>>{oldoneeyed} : The fact that they keep getting caught lying is itself proof that they suck at lying. So no, they aren\'t "good at it". Truth is there just isn\'t nearly as much there as right wingers want to believe. They\'re average washington. After years of the last Clinton presidency the worst thing the republicans could find on him was him fucking Lewinsky. Clinton had multiple hearings on Benghazi and she humiliated the committee members. Sit back and honestly consider all this for a minute.', ">>{timmyjj3} : Because there's lots of polling that suggests it's true.", '>>{Torncano} : Is it that he has Parkinsons disease? Then both candidates would have it!', ">>{timmyjj3} : I'm honestly curious if you think Hillary's corruption is not even more obvious and more disgusting to a lot of people?", ">>{Bluecheesemmmm} : I totally disagree. People change their spoken opinions all the time depending on who they are speaking to or around. Would you admit you've never done this yourself? In at least to save ass not face? It's no different from religious views. Sometimes its well worth the acrobatics or biting of the tounge depending on the social setting. People do it everyday, if not for anything else but to hold privacy sacred. The genius of the crowd, get what i a m saying?", '>>{oldoneeyed} : Oh yeah? There\'s lots of polling that says a lot of shit. It\'s a fucking stupid notion. But go ahead. Show me this "polling". Republicans have been playing this "silent majority" card for decades and it has always been complete bullshit. Wingnuts are never silent. And Trump\'s only reliable demographic is wingnuts.', ">>{Torncano} : No one trusts them. If they wanted Trump gone they should have endorsed him. They don't understand that most people see them as biased propagandists.", ">>{oldoneeyed} : So has everything Trump has said the past fucking year. Doesn't seem to matter much in the big scheme of things. America is going to move on to the next round of bullshit in a week.", ">>{Kissing_Toast} : Yeah, I do think that. Is she flawless? No. But she's never bribed an Attorney General or scammed people out of thousands of dollars with a University.", ">>{oldoneeyed} : >People change their spoken opinions all the time depending on who they are speaking to or around Conservative white people don't give a fuck. They never have. >Would you admit you've never done this yourself? In at least to save ass not face? Oh please. You're assuming republicans have shame and a concept of sociability. They don't. I", '>>{CreepyStickGuy} : they are not average washington. No one else has an impeachment under their belt. Biden is average washington. Benghazi is pointless and for show, I\'ll give you that. The issues with Lewinsky wasn\'t that he actually did it, its that he lied about it under oath. The fact that he did that should make anyone worried about his and (by extension in some people\'s minds) her integrity. I\'m talking about the \'mysterious deaths\' surrounding them, the fact that Comey came out and said "she really fucked up and this is negligence, but meh, its fine," the non-action in Rawana, the issues in the Balkans, or any of the other actual bad things they have done that no one really brings up.', ">>{IAmSmellingLikeARose} : You can't shake pneumonia in a week let alone before the first debate. If it is pneumonia.", ">>{lolatawp} : People like gossip. There's still lots of interest in the story of a powerful world leader who may or may not be knocking on deaths door. That's a story that has staying power. A story about dubious financial dealings has no staying power unless they found that Trump is somehow funding ISIS, or is wholly funding Hillarys campaign or something equally outlandish.", ">>{agentup} : There's lots of Republicans out there voting blindly or near blindly for Trump. Meaning they just assume he's gonna lower taxes and focus on big and small business improvements. What hillary can do is show that don the con isn't actually in it for the middle class. He has a pattern of suing, discriminating, and stiffing the people he does business with. If hillary can make these republicans see that a man who bribes attorneys and pays for paintings of himself with charity money isn't motivated or fit enough to implement a standard republican platform. She'll win by a landslide. Frustrating thing for me is trump supporters say he'll make America great. Do all this economy hocus pocus. Be a hardass on our enemies. Give us so many freedoms. But the actual on the record things Trumps done paints the picture of a total con artist. A man who would sell Springfield a monorail", ">>{oldoneeyed} : Pneumonia usually clears up in about a week or two. So actually you can. By that time she'll be over the worst of it, at any rate. But that's besides the point that Americans are idiots with short attention spans and will forget this just like they forget everything else.", '>>{oldoneeyed} : >they are not average washington. Trust me, they are. The place is a hive of scum and villainy. >I\'m talking about the \'mysterious deaths\' surrounding them This is bullshit conspiracy theory and I laugh at you for buying into it. What\'s your source? Fucking Breitbart? Last I checked Roger Stone isn\'t dead and he\'s a target they actually probably do want to kill. >the fact that Comey came out and said "she really fucked up and this is negligence, but meh, its fine, Her fucking up isn\'t the same as her committing a crime, much as you would like to believe that. > the non-action in Rawana, You know what\'s hilarious? People hate them for being interventionist, and then get mad at them for not doing anything in Rwanda.', ">>{CreepyStickGuy} : > I laugh at you for buying into it. You are basically proving my point. The fact that people won't even acknowledge that fact that it might be true (which is why I put it in quotations, because I don't know if it is true) and instead you laugh at me and call me a conspiracy theorist. This is the kind of non-questioning mentality people have been sold because it might make them sound 'crazy.' You prove my point by responding like this. I don't know if they actually did it or not, no one does, but I'm not simple enough to believe they wouldn't or counldn't do something like this. At the end of the day, it isn't even a discussion or a question even though lots of people have died around them. It is just suspicious is all. > Her fucking up isn't the same as her committing a crime I never said I thought it was a crime. > get mad at them for not doing anything in Rwanda. Very different. Rwanda would not have been them intervening in overthrowing a governmental power, it would be them intervening to stop a genocide by neighbors rising up against neighbors simply because of race. Its the lack of consistency that bothers me. The American government is fine with Darfur but not fine with Saddam in Iraq.", ">>{chi-hi} : When you think about it early voting isn't that great", '>>{SonofMan87} : This is the nut graf: >It also reveals a web of contractual entanglements that could not just be canceled. If Trump moves into the White House and his family continues to receive any benefit from the company, during or even after his presidency, almost every foreign policy decision he makes will raise serious conflicts of interest and ethical quagmires.', ">>{Red_Nudist_Jaguars} : Later today I'll reply here to say if I agree with this statement or not.", '>>{jacksonstew} : Straight out of Idiocracy: "If you don\'t smoke Tarryltons, Fuck you!" This is an incredibly narrow and childish article.', ">>{AlphaCygni} : He reposted it because he wrote it such that people thought the mental breakdown story was coming out today. The mental breakdown story isn't yet fully developed, but apparently it happened back in 1990. If you look at what happened in 1990 to Trump is not surprising.", '>>{Bluecheesemmmm} : That was quite an emotional response, sorry you misunderstood. I was talking about people in general, not conservatives. Slow down and try reading a little more carefully.', ">>{LastDawnOfMan} : Its the essence of the demogog: tell big lies, provide little or no detail, appeal to the gullible, desperate, ignorant, or greedy. It's just like when any other scam artist gets a hold of someone and promises to fulfill their dreams. The victim defends the scam harder than anyone, until after their money is all gone and they have nothing to show for it.", '>>{LastDawnOfMan} : I don\'t think the support for Hillary is as desperate and intense as it is for Trump. She\'s not the one telling big lies about all the ludicrous things she\'s going to fix magically, so she doesn\'t draw the delusional and desperate like Trump does. With her, it\'s just rational people saying, "things will probably be similar to what they are now, at least, instead of a giant flaming disaster."', '>>{JumpingJazzJam} : Oh I think the body double story is much bigger.']]

classify and reply

[">>{donthinkitbelikeitis} : Trump's Presidency So Unethical, Americans Have Crashed the Gov't Ethics Site - Seriously!", ">>{SteinBradly} : I don't think those funds will go into better servers, unfortunately...have you seen the Mr. Moneybags running the show?", '>>{UrukHaiGuyz} : The poster\'s point is dumb, but they spelled it correctly. "Papier" (Poppy-eh) is French for "paper".', '>>{UrukHaiGuyz} : Sorry, all out of ethics! Come back in four years.', ">>{Daves_Juicy_Double} : I didn't know the government's web hosting reliability was a measure of the president's ethics.", '>>{sloppyjoes7} : The source is https://trofire.com I checked our the source, and every "news" item they have is anti-Trump or pro-left wing commentary.', '>>{binaryecho} : https://twitter.com/OfficeGovEthics Here ya go. Maybe do a bit of digging before you dismiss solely based on a URL.', '>>{sloppyjoes7} : I was discussing the first half of the headline, which is obviously an attack on Trump. Any thinking person would recognize that.', ">>{binaryecho} : I know what you were doing. You know what you are doing. Don't do it. Think.", '>>{GeoleVyi} : Monty python cheese shop sketch, but instead of types of cheeses, replace with "freedom," "liberty," "ethics," "morals," "scruples," "good will," "compassion,"... etc. etc. etc.', '>>{ManyJoeys} : Seems like the left is the unethical side, lose the election, whine and riot like children']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{donthinkitbelikeitis} : Trump's Presidency So Unethical, Americans Have Crashed the Gov't Ethics Site - Seriously!", ">>{SteinBradly} : I don't think those funds will go into better servers, unfortunately...have you seen the Mr. Moneybags running the show?", '>>{UrukHaiGuyz} : The poster\'s point is dumb, but they spelled it correctly. "Papier" (Poppy-eh) is French for "paper".', '>>{UrukHaiGuyz} : Sorry, all out of ethics! Come back in four years.', ">>{Daves_Juicy_Double} : I didn't know the government's web hosting reliability was a measure of the president's ethics.", '>>{sloppyjoes7} : The source is https://trofire.com I checked our the source, and every "news" item they have is anti-Trump or pro-left wing commentary.', '>>{binaryecho} : https://twitter.com/OfficeGovEthics Here ya go. Maybe do a bit of digging before you dismiss solely based on a URL.', '>>{sloppyjoes7} : I was discussing the first half of the headline, which is obviously an attack on Trump. Any thinking person would recognize that.', ">>{binaryecho} : I know what you were doing. You know what you are doing. Don't do it. Think.", '>>{GeoleVyi} : Monty python cheese shop sketch, but instead of types of cheeses, replace with "freedom," "liberty," "ethics," "morals," "scruples," "good will," "compassion,"... etc. etc. etc.', '>>{ManyJoeys} : Seems like the left is the unethical side, lose the election, whine and riot like children']]

classify and reply

['>>{Harkonnen30} : After Trump’s immigration order, anxiety grows in Florida’s vegetable fields', ">>{aggie1391} : Clinton camp: Trump guilty of 'actual pay-to-play'", '>>{icnoevil} : Hayden: Trump ‘Forgot That He Was President,’ Could See Wiretapping Proof', '>>{icnoevil} : When will this nitwit grow up and realize that he won, barely?', ">>{SaintBrutus} : Trump forgets he's president every Friday at 5 pm.", ">>{MrMoogle03} : Yes, but Trump wasn't a Secretary of State.", ">>{johnfrance} : Right but Clinton didn't commit actual pay to play, just rhetorically in the mind of republicans.", ">>{Satinduljentagartota} : >“You can actually make a good living — $15, $20 an hour if you’re good at this — but the truth is Americans don’t want to do this work,” said one prominent Florida farmer, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he feared Trump’s administration would target him for speaking out. I don't believe any of that. When I was growing up, we used to pick tobacco - this was a long time ago - and make money for college. It was really hard work, but we were outside, had fun, hooked up, and made some money.", ">>{banana-viking} : I'm not sure he actually knows what being President means.", '>>{fyhr100} : With Sessions scandal, the Alabamafication of America is complete', '>>{letdogsvote} : Yeah, but that would be fake intel from sad agencies. Much better and more reliable to just go with Breitbart.', ">>{IczyAlley} : Yeah, and kids still de-tassel corn in Illinois, Nebraska, and Iowa. But that labor isn't enough for the whole harvest. You need immigrant labor to effectively run a farm. Especially in South Florida, where it's MUCH MUCH hotter than in NC, or KY, or wherever you harvested tobacco.", ">>{JustGotOffOfTheTrain} : If farmers are so concerned about Trump's immigration policies then why are rural voters so overwhelmingly Republican?", ">>{Wolf-Head} : They're also poor but vote against things that would help them.", ">>{Supermunch2000} : He doesn't need proof, he has people that tell him things and that's enough for him. If he actually read anything or knew anything he could possibly be held accountable - this way he can simply state that he was given the wrong information and, in his head, he did/said nothing wrong. At any rate, **if** he really was wiretapped the approval must have been given by one of those secret courts. **If** it had been given it would have been because there were reasons that involve national security. **If** it involved national security and was kept secret it might have been because there was a plausible reason to give permission to the wiretap. If he actually pressures congress into investigating and they uncover anything, there would be proof that, while a candidate, he was considered a threat to national security.", ">>{Satinduljentagartota} : There's a documentary about this. It's called *Idiocracy*.", ">>{The_Write_Stuff} : Florida farmers voted overwhelmingly for Trump. You pay $20/hour and you won't have any trouble finding people to pick tomatoes. For that money I could supply a couple hundred Uber drivers.", ">>{cgilbertmc} : If Don-the-Con hears it, **that's PROOF**. That is the only threshold he has.", ">>{EmergencyChocolate} : On a purely soap opera level, Alabama politics is super popcorn-worthy. It's always been fast and loose in that part of the country, but the last couple of years there has been the makings of a pure southern gothic potboiler. [Maddow did a recent expose that really showcases the luridness of it all](http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/sex-scandalized-alabama-gov-appointment-sparks-corruption-outry-874079299568). GQ did a great piece as well: [The Love Song of Robert Bentley, Alabama’s Horndog Governor](http://www.gq.com/story/affair-robert-bentley-alabama-governor) Pretty entertaining stuff for outsiders, but I imagine there's nothing all that funny about it if you live in the state and are having to watch all the corruption swirling around while your communities sink deeper and deeper into poverty.", ">>{watthefucksalommy} : Warning... site is kinda cancerous. Viewing on mobile, can't read more than a paragraph without adverts opening in new windows.", '>>{digitalboss} : Everyone wants the president to show evidence of his claims, yet they have no evidence of their own claims.', '>>{free_george_bush} : Just so you know, there are now ad blockers for iOS and Android as well.', '>>{YourMomPutsOut} : >"I was a businessman. I give to everybody. When they call, I give. And you know what? When I need something from them, two years later, three years later, I call them, and they are there for me.” A man of principle. /s', ">>{JustGotOffOfTheTrain} : It's like the people on the Texas border that don't want a fence. It's not like Trump was subtle about what he wanted to do.", '>>{drugorexic} : He also, as President, can de-classify any document. This is just a diversion to distract from the Russian investigation.', ">>{seventeenninetytwo} : On PC with NoScript, AdBlock, and PiHole it's actually formatted pretty well. It's sad that this is required to have a decent internet browsing experience.", '>>{Shr3kk_Wpg} : I say he is a liar and I can back up those claims.', ">>{SpearNmagicHelmet} : He's a liar and you can't dispute it. He has zero credibility and the respect of the U.S. around the world is cratering. Yeah, we want to see the liar's proof. He said Obama wire tapped him. Not maybe, not if, he said he did it. Now either show us what you got Mr. President or shut the fuck up.", ">>{Impulse-Buy} : Farmers are concerned about losing their veritable slaves. I hate to say it, but deporting these peoples would increase wages for any that remained or slipped through the cracks, and also create incentives for non illegals to do the work. People say Americans won't do the work, but I know berry farmers, and they don't want Americans, they want slave labor. Yes, we may have to pay more for some of our food. I would be willing to pay more for these foods regardless of who was picking them, if it meant people were getting paid higher wages to do it, whether they be migrants or not.", '>>{TavishGauss} : >The Washington Post reported that Drumpf’s foundation did not list a donation to the group backing Bondi in its 2013 tax filings. The Drumpf Foundation instead detailed a contribution to a charity in Kansas with a similar name which was never actually made. Drumpf’s organization additionally listed “no” when asked on a tax form if it had made any political donations that year. >**“It was just an honest mistake,” Jeffrey McConney, a senior vice president at the Drumpf Organization, told the Post Thursday. "It wasn’t done intentionally to hide a political donation, it was just an error.”** I call bullshit', ">>{fyhr100} : You're welcome! At least Alabama is leading the way in something!", '>>{digitalboss} : I want to see evidence of the claims that the mainstream media are making that his campaign colluded with the Russians. CNN has no evidence. MSNBC has no evidence. ABC has no evidence. They make claims but have no evidence. Show us what you got CNN, or shut up.', ">>{SpearNmagicHelmet} : So it's your belief that all 17 Intelligence agencies are full of shit. Ok, moving on.", ">>{NoelBuddy} : It's the Cobra Commander problem. The guy's popular with the troops for some reason, so you give him some power and he just fucks around with it and screws things up because he's a nitwit. Sure Destro is there to put out the fires and pull the behind the curtain strings, but CC keeps lighting the curtain on fire!", '>>{mrkushie} : How in the world has this not gotten more press?', '>>{BrellK} : Hey, Cobra Commander is great at morale and his visions. Who else would have come up with the plan for Weather Domination?', ">>{ndegges} : Hey now, we're pretty good at college football too!", '>>{DebussySIMiami} : Trump actually paying people for work is pretty rare.', '>>{Ruslan124} : Because getting rid of immigrants outweighs all else for them.', ">>{pramoni} : Whoa, IRS fines---now the suspicion should be raised about what his tax returns do show! Of course he's GOP - so the collaborationists won't question him or his motives. He's another Harding in the making!", '>>{CantStumpTh3Trump} : Trumps constituents were his employees, yours were the American people who elected you Clinton. Not difficult.', ">>{SchwarzerKaffee} : Psychic spies from Russia try to steal your mom's elation... And if you want these kinds of dreams it's Alabamafication.", '>>{gonzone} : So these farmers were working undocumented persons and no one prosecuted them for that?', '>>{digitalboss} : > 17 Intelligence agencies They have provided no evidence.', '>>{Harkonnen30} : I\'m in California and know many "illegal immigrants". They\'re some of the hardest working, dedicated people I know. Not a single one is looking for free handouts from the government.', '>>{donnyradwell} : They put the uppers in the jello? Got it', ">>{ThornyPlebeian} : Because the beltway media is throwing a tantrum over press conferences. They're punishing Hillary's campaign like aggrieved children until they get what they want.", '>>{CinnamonJ} : And yet, they keep on voting for the type of asshole.', '>>{Ruslan124} : Long time ago, the world hs changed. You do not need to believe the word of an internet stranger, do some research and find out what happened in Georgia when immigrant labor was driven away. Crops rotted in the fields and unemployed American citizens did not come and fill the labor void. If was a disaster. They had to force prisoner to try and help but it was still a disaster. https://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/05/17/the-law-of-unintended-consequences-georgias-immigration-law-backfires/#3178ce70492a', ">>{h34dyr0kz} : http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/undocumented-workers-immigration-alabama You don't have to believe that one farmer, but would a whole state making the same mistake change your mind?", ">>{dagwood222} : Gee, I kind of remember a couple of years back, iirc Georgia went full bore after illegals and couldn't get most of the crops in.", '>>{turtledan87} : Dems: we need to pay all people a fair living wage whatever the job! Also Dems: we need a permanent underclass of foreign labor we can pay less than minimum or our agriculture will sink 🤔', ">>{0moorad0} : He won hugely, and bigly, don't offend our leader comrade.", '>>{mvs2527} : Well that may require him to read the report...', '>>{ahoyakite} : Trump accused Obama of wiretapping Trump tower so he could know whether or not his tower was actually wiretapped in his ongoing investigation. He used his tweet to get the Justice Dept. to tell him what type of evidence they had on him up to this point. Which if true, means that whatever conversation took place could be a huge piece of evidence against him.', ">>{knox3} : You should see the anxiety among farm owners! They have to relearn what minimum wage is, figure out what sort of benefits they have to provide legal employees...it's very stressful for them too!", '>>{Ganjake} : The ideal unemployment rate for our country is what we\'re almost at right now. That\'s called full employment. If you think suddenly people are just gonna swoop in and take all these jobs then enjoy paying twice as much for produce as you do now. Inflation is a bitch and those of you with "economic anxiety" better get some economic xanax.', '>>{UvonTheDeplorable} : >At the heart of it, the Alabama Problem is a simple one to explain: When the majority party fails to hold its own to the same -- or preferably, higher -- standards it holds the opposite party, corruption and incompetence are inevitable.', '>>{PutinPuppetTrump} : Flynn quit and Sessions lied under oath because of Russia. Nothing to see here!', ">>{StonerMeditation} : Trump is a criminal, a cheat, an imposter and a con man. He has ties with the American and Russian MOBs. Trump has had over 3,500 lawsuits, even his wife is suing someone because of slander - which is hilarious considering she's a cheap wannabe porn star. Trump knows how stupid his supporters are and takes advantage of that by lying right to their faces - but they're suckers and want their taxes raised, so Trump and the 1% can get more tax breaks, and his supporters will QUIETLY watch Trump destroy planet Earth with DENIAL of Human-Caused Climate Change, and more wars. Trump plays on their fears, hate, and poverty, but Trump supporters have no courage - are are afraid that Trump might tweet something about them - and keeps up his lies so THEY won't ever see the real Trump.", ">>{mathieu_delarue} : I've realized that every accusation Trump makes about another person is actually something that he is doing. I would absolutely love to play poker with this guy.", ">>{Drunkhistoryx} : Things have seriously changed in the last ten years. Kids don't even go outside anymore, much less do ball busting labor for minimum wage. I can't even entice teenagers with $15 an hour and if you can, they suck at the job and complain the whole time, then quit after a day or two.", ">>{berniebrah} : Terrorists from Sweden try to steal your mom's elation And if you want these kind of dreams it's Trumpifornication", ">>{ph33randloathing} : It's almost like he doesn't know how to do his job and is incapable of learning.", '>>{AttackSkunk} : Well, they do have an Я next to their names. That stands for Яeal AmeЯicans, right?', ">>{Drunkhistoryx} : This is the truth. Get ready for your grocery bill to double, and that's a kind estimate.", ">>{manzoire} : I hate trump, but he's a businessman. It's kinda how it works. But the government is a totally different playing field. Edit: comment is being misinterpreted. Of course I believe its wrong. I hate it when businesses break the laws and avoid taxes and put them in panama. Nobody hates this more than me. I'm just saying that if your in government, kinda like the parents in the house, you are held to a higher standard then the children if that make sense.", '>>{Quinnjester} : Yeah this is worse than anything from Clinton...upvote this.', ">>{isikorsky} : > most farmers in the US don't rely on illegal immigrants LOL. You have obviously never been here in Florida in the farming communities. Ignore Orlando and visit the rest of the middle of the state around Lake Okeechobee. English is not the primary language. Or maybe you should read about the Coalition of Immokalee Workers, an organization that frees illegal immigrants from slave labor conditions in Florida agriculture. There have [been](http://www.npr.org/2011/08/26/139972669/the-unsavory-story-of-industrially-grown-tomatoes) more than 1,200 people freed from slavery rings in Florida agriculture in the last 10 or 15 years.", '>>{CpnStumpy} : That Cyrillic character is pronounced ya (not yeah). Enjoy trying to read your post now. Good day.', '>>{farcetragedy} : Exactly my thought. If it were Hillary that did this the press would be huge.', '>>{Muppet1616} : http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/texas The vast majority of counties at the border voted for clinton with 20% + margins.', '>>{OpnotIc} : Anyone know of an Adblock with the power to function through the Reddit official iOS app?', '>>{EndoShota} : The Clintons are too smart to leave direct, damning evidence of their pay-to-play activities, and our legal and social definitions of "corruption" have become so narrow that it\'s possible to get away with just about anything short of cutting a check with "for political favors" in the memo.', ">>{PixelBrewery} : No one has said definitively that his campaign colluded with the Russians. 17 intelligence agencies determined that Russia had a systematic program in place to help Trump win, however, and we are finding out that more and more individuals from Trump's campaign met with Russian officials and then lied about it for some reason, and Trump has been siding with Putin in terms of foreign policy. People are drawing conclusions, but still demanding an independent investigation to see if there was collusion.", '>>{_Quetzalcoatlus_} : What we really need is comprehensive immigration reform, like what the bi partisan Gang of Eight pushed for a few years back, before it was squashed by boehner. A combination of additional security (not a dumb wall) and a path to citizenship. That would go a long ways in curbing the "slave labor."', ">>{Ganjake} : It's gonna take these people paying 4 bucks for a gallon of milk in bumfuck Florida to see this, I feel bad for them and then I don't because they didn't take the time to learn about consequences of certain policies and realize they're voting against themselves in every way possible.", '>>{bisjac} : Everyone in here is trying to justify cheap labor to justify allowing illegals lol. Must have our slaves!!! (So long as they can illegally vote blue as well)', '>>{OlimarsOnion} : Or you could speak with your wallet by supporting sites with a good experience and avoiding sites with a bad experience.', '>>{digitalboss} : your statement is wrong on many points. get it straight.', ">>{PrimerGray} : They have been for a while. Crimson Tide isn't a coincidence.", '>>{Roseking} : You do know there are two sides right? People in the government can\'t take money from people if the people don\'t offer it to them. By this logic you are saying it is okay to do something wrong because \'It\'s business". Does the excuse "It\'s politics" work for you?', '>>{TavishGauss} : Bribing a state AG to not bring charges against your fraudulent university is "kinda how business works"? Seriously??', ">>{Ganjake} : Worked in many restaurants in Florida, same thing for me in every one. Whoever or whatever they were outside of work, they aways busted their ass and deserved to be there. I learned work ethic from my dad, but if I learned it from some of the dishwashers I met I'd be proud.", '>>{dmetzcher} : > "Alabamafication of America" That phrase alone *terrifies* me.', ">>{wheresHQ} : That's the problem with journalism and fear mongers. They spit sh*t out to generate clicks. I say both sides start showing evidence for their claims. That'll shut up people on both sides. Americans on both sides, will start to learn more and more about Washington's sh*t. However, I must state that Republicans have been fear mongering for a long time now. Let's just talk about the recent EPA rollbacks. Lead bullets?? Why?? Talk to any hunter and you'll realize that they love the environment the most. Chemical dumping into streams? Destroying America should be considered TREASON. Those companies and individuals would be destroying the very land our fellow American soldiers die for. All of us need to f**ken realize that we're American before republican or democrat or independent.", ">>{zazabar} : I agree on the slave labor part. But there's another viewpoint you have to look at. It might not impact Florida as much, but it definitely affects a lot of agriculture. When you visit farmlands, how many people live out there? Not many, right? If you cut out the illegals, there will suddenly be few people left to work the fields, even if you increase wages. We will need to find a way to entice people to leave cities and go live in farmlands, and that will be very hard.", ">>{Ganjake} : >Dems: we need a permanent underclass of foreign labor we can pay less than minimum or our agriculture will sink 🤔 You're totally missing the point. Nobody is saying that we **need** illegal immigrants, that's absurd. What we're saying is that creating this workforce vacuum causes inflation and chaos. We need to legitimize these jobs more gradually with immigration reform, not kick them all out at once and fuck up all the progress we've made since 2008. You won't find a Democrat who says we need a permanent foreign labor force, cmon man. This is economics 101 and that's what this is about. Nobody is saying illegal immigration is okay. We're saying the way Trump is going about it is going to fuck with our economy hard.", '>>{Zlibservacratican} : It seems to work for the Clinton camp, now the Trump camp is trying to use it.', '>>{mrbarky} : That\'s perfect for you isn\'t it? You all get to chant "lock her up" but have a ready made universal excuse to not have actual evidence of actual crimes. Neat!', '>>{ozric101} : Idiocy is about voting democrat.. but nice try.', '>>{Piscator629} : Tonya? Is he going to pop Hillary inna knees?', '>>{zbchampion} : Democrat in Alabama here: most of them are spoon fed a diet of football, Mountain Dew, Jesus and conservative falsehoods from the day of their birth. They can\'t be convinced to stop voting against their own self interests. Edit to add example: My parents always vote party line Republican. My father is a cancer survivor with a heart condition and diabetes (pre existing conditions). My mother is on Social Security and Medicare. My sister is on our father\'s insurance. They continually vote for people who want to dismantle the only means for any of them to have and afford health care. Their preferred party wants to cut the entitlement programs from which my mother continues to benefit. Ask them why, they say Obama is probably Muslim, and Hillary did something with "the email". (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻', ">>{MissionStyle} : It's completely OK, because it's Trump, and its only the 194th worst thing he's done.", ">>{charmed_im-sure} : a mexican embargo against the united states would disrupt 33% of our food supply, the salinas valley alone provides for 25% ... not sure they understand this ... i mean, tpp wasn't about china, but they think so. so what are we to think? plan? plan hard?", ">>{Harkonnen30} : Most farmers in the United States don't rely on illegal immigrants who work for under-the-table slave wages. This is not a true statement...at least in California, where it was mentioned earlier is responsible for the largest % of the country's domestic food. Come to California and talk to some of the farmers. Almost 100% of the work force is unregistered immigrants. In fact, the immigrants usually make more money than they would in other entry level jobs because the farmers aren't required to pay benefits etc. So under-the-table slave wages isn't a bad gig for a lot of the workers who simply want to send money back to their families in South America.", ">>{unknamed} : I'm convinced of it... he's too dumb to even know what authority he does and doesn't have. And that should be like... probably the #1 thing you know about your job.", '>>{grrhss} : I have to use "Dixie Oroborous" at least three times today.', ">>{Harkonnen30} : Something else that hasn't been bubbled up to the top here is that a lot of undocumented immigrants make pretty decent money because the farmers aren't required to pay for benefits, etc. This means more money to send home to their families in South America which is usually the reason they are working here. The immigrants aren't stupid...it makes very good financial sense for them.", ">>{MarbhDamhsa} : Nevada is a little bit like this too. Nowhere near the same scope as in AL, but it's similar", ">>{Harkonnen30} : See my comment below about their wages. They aren't necessarily slave wages at all.", ">>{prolayupse} : You definitely missed the point of that movie. Which isn't surprising.", '>>{archaeolinuxgeek} : So I should have been spelling it "Яll quaida" this entire time?', '>>{digitalboss} : > that Russia had a systematic program in place to help Trump win I think it is a stretch to say they were trying to help him win.', ">>{Tryhard3r} : Very good point, I hadn't thought of that angle. Would also explain why intel offices were slow in denouncing the claims.", ">>{free_george_bush} : There's a $2 one that claims to block ads in other apps (even those in-game ads) but I haven't tried it. I browse reddit on Safari though.", ">>{sickofthisshit} : It's not just living in rural areas. Much of the workforce is migrant: any particular crop gets picked for a short time, then they move on to where the next crop gets picked. This is not steady work at one location.", ">>{Harkonnen30} : Not that I disagree with you here, but this type of statement is why the left and the right want to kill each other right now. To solve the huge problems we are facing right now, unity is what's required. Some people will follow Trump regardless of what he does. Others just don't know better. The latter are the ones that can be reached, but they're not going to listen if they are insulted right out of the gate.", '>>{WaldoTime} : You need to sit your father down and have a talk about diabetes. Diabetes fucks up your whole body; increased risk of heart disease, vision loss, sensory/motor loss, and kidney failure. If the GOP plan goes through, he might not be able to get insurance. And diabetes treatment costs a lot of money. I have a stubborn father myself. So what if Obama is Muslim, spending as much time with you and sister and your mom should be more important. If he sees that in those terms, he might start to rethink his views. Then, you can unflip that table.', '>>{MissionStyle} : Not only did Trump overtly bribe an AG, but he has also bragged about it.', '>>{zbchampion} : That\'s a great idea on paper, but that ship\'s long since sailed. He\'s not interested in my "pinko commie bullshit." Ironic since he now supports the official American Political Party of the Kremlin.', ">>{WaldoTime} : Even if it prolongs his life and makes it less painful? Can your sister get through to him? I have diabetes running in a lot of my family. The end results aren't pretty.", '>>{TheSoupOrNatural} : The issue goes beyond user experience. Advertising can also be a vehicle for malicious actors to gain access to you and your computer. The online advertising industry needs to grow up and agree to work with consumers on that issue, and until they do I will continue to speak with my wallet and outright prohibit their content on my computer.', ">>{Harkonnen30} : > Dems: we need to pay all people a fair living wage whatever the job! I think the Democratic stance is to pay all citizens a living wage by raising the minimum wage. That's entirely different than paying all people a minimum wage. And the argument that Dems are advocating for a permanent underclass of foreign labor is in direct contradiction with the Democratic stance. Dems would much rather have these workers be legal - they've even proposed a path to citizenship for these workers. The Republican argument for disallowing a path to citizenship boggles by mind. Frankly the only argument for that as far as I can tell is pure 100% good ol' fashion racism.", ">>{Harkonnen30} : Are you a farmer? If so, I'm curious to hear your opinion.", ">>{Il_Cortegiano} : Ah yes. The real 'economic anxiety'.", ">>{c0pypastry} : How would he forget that? He's constantly telling everyone how bigly yuge his winning was.", '>>{StonerMeditation} : After 8 years of disrespecting Obama, and 30 years of smearing Hillary Clinton, Conservatives want liberals to respect their 1% corporate stooge, climate-change denier, criminal with mob and Russian ties, sexual predator, reality TV president??? **RESIST Trump**', ">>{jonnyp11} : Yup, CTR controls this sub, that's why this is at 56% right now. There are just as many Trump plants that it cancels each other out, assuming CTR actually does anything here.", '>>{sourbrew} : Not that what Trump did is excusable but I think arms deals to dictators is probably a far more serious issue.', '>>{jubbergun} : > As a reminder, this subreddit is for civil discussion. LOL, this is the modern version of "We\'ve always been at war with Eastasia." The comments in this sub are hardly ever civil, especially under a post about "dumb southerners."', ">>{jubbergun} : > And yet, they keep on voting for the type of asshole. [Southerner's do love their horndog governors.](http://c2.nrostatic.com/sites/default/files/styles/original_image_with_cropping/public/uploaded/bill-clinton-sex-scandals-hillary-campaign.jpg?itok=W6yOiBz2)", ">>{trotsky102} : I'm pretty moderate, but I live in a small town in Louisiana and people don't realize how accurate your statement is. The people around here make me look life a left wing radical. However, many of the people around here are still intelligent. It's just a lot of cognizant dissonance. It's not understanding the full picture. I really do wish that courses in politics were taught from a young age as separate class from history or social studies. Too many people all around don't understand the system they live in.", ">>{sugarfreeeyecandy} : Get ready for news reports that crops are rotting in the field and on the vine as well as spiking food prices. Trump will claim it's all the fault of Democrats. Perhaps he'll make an Executive Order that uses slave prisoner labor to harvest crops?", '>>{Solario_ff14} : Except that access is a whole hell of a lot different from dropping charges.', ">>{zazabar} : That's an even better point, thank you for clarifying on that. How do we convince people who are fresh out of high school to go around farmland to farmland picking and processing crops x% of the year? Gonna have to be some good pay and benefits for that or something.", ">>{digitalboss} : The only EPA regulation that I have heard that he will rollback is the so called 2015 Waters of the United States rule which over-reaches to any puddle or stream anywhere. The 1972 Clean Water Act that it was expanded from was meant to cover navigable waterways, not every puddle and stream. Obama selective enforced laws, I didn't hear you bitching then. Republicans are fear mongering? WTF? The dems live and die on fear mongering! They act like Trump is the end of the world. No! Global warming is the end of the world! No! It's the Russians! Hacking our election! End of the world!", ">>{Drew4} : >at the Drumpf Organization Yeah, that's some unbiased reporting.", '>>{EndoShota} : >You all get to chant "lock her up" You all? I\'m a liberal, and, while I don\'t like Clinton, I\'m not a Trump supporter, and I don\'t think she should go to jail. >have a ready made universal excuse to not have actual evidence of actual crimes. Actually, the societal and *legal* definitions of corruption have [changed](http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/05/04/404052618/beyond-quid-pro-quo-what-counts-as-political-corruption) substantially in recent decades to where it\'s practically impossible to prosecute someone, and that\'s a problem regardless of who we\'re talking about.', '>>{RugerRedhawk} : Do you really doubt that Russia would benefit from the instability of a Trump presidency?', ">>{cl33t} : > I hate trump, but he's a businessman. It's kinda how it works. No. No that's not how it works. You don't get a pass on breaking the law because you run a business.", ">>{digitalboss} : It's only been about 1 month. The Senate Democrats are deliberately slowing down his appointments. Take a chill pill dude.", '>>{GoogleCrab} : Have you been living under a rock? There has never been a more unstable presidency in the history of the United States.', '>>{rob_banks} : Deny everything, admit nothing and make counter accusations. Such an inspiring leadership.', ">>{youforgotA} : Isn't it only illegal to *take* bribes?", ">>{druuconian} : > he's a businessman. It's kinda how it works. That's kinda how *fraudulent* businesses work. That's how, say, payday lenders work. #leadership", ">>{Starmedia11} : No. Bribing a public official is also a crime. Offering a cop money to let you out of a speeding ticket is illegal. But you need the direct quid pro quo. Did he donate the money intending to get the charges drop, and did she drop them because he donated the money? That's illegal for both of them.", '>>{digitalboss} : and if he were a democrat, you would be saying that is his prerogative. bias.', ">>{empanadacat} : I can't even respect people who call him Drumpf. Really? For all the world of shit you can hurl at him, you choose a schoolyard taunt on his family's name and heritage? That's some serious glass house shit.", '>>{PmMePicsOfYourDog} : It\'s a stupid insult, I agree, but it\'s not just because his old name sounds funny. It\'s because he himself taunted Jon Stewart about his family\'s name. "If Jon Stewart is so above it all & legit, why did he change his name from Jonathan Leibowitz? He should be proud of his heritage!"', '>>{TheGreenGuy91} : The best part about clintons people calling trump out for this is that Clinton is one of the people he used to pay for favors. He used to be a huge Clinton supporter/donator.', '>>{digitalboss} : and if he were a democrat, you would be saying it is still early. bias.', ">>{woo7} : If there's nothing to admin on pay to play, there's nothing to admit. Here, we have a case of a candidate actually fined by the IRS for the thing he's accusing his opponent of, and yet it barely gets any coverage. Inspiring indeed.", ">>{GoogleCrab} : It's frightening how much damage he's been able to do so early in his presidency. Being a democrat or republican has nothing to do with it. As far as I'm concerned, ideology-wise, Trump is neither.", ">>{digitalboss} : it is good that he is neither, that is what we want. we want him to do damage. we want him to undo ALL of Obama's bullshit. We want him to not be considered an establishment republican. we want less government. we want less regulations. we want less taxes. we want someone who will not selectively enforce our laws. we want all of the onerous oversized government bullshit GONE!", ">>{slinky783} : It's because the Clinton strategy is to deflect by projecting their problems on their opponents and taking opponent positions that have gained favor as their own. People see right through it.", ">>{Wish_Bear} : He told clinton to come to his wedding, she did, because he donates to her. It's the corruptor vs the corruptee. I'm voting Jill Stein.", '>>{MC_Fap_Commander} : The FBI report also notes that Clinton received a March 2011 memo alerting her to an increase of “cyber actors targeting State employees’ personal e-mail accounts.” The e-mail urged State officials to limit their use of personal e-mail accounts for official business since “some compromised home systems have been reconfigured by these actors to automatically forward copies of all composed e-mails to an undisclosed recipient.”\trob_banks\tt1_d78bypm\nt3_510bza\tt1_d78ouux\t1472955462\tJust because you don\'t agree with it doesn\'t mean it should be banned\tskullbeats\tt1_d78cooe\nt3_50yviv\tt1_d78ozcc\t1472955702\tTrump, the DNC hack, Hillary\'s memory problems, they\'re all part of Vladimir Putin\'s scheme to overthrow the western world.\tTesticleElectrical\tt1_d78dykw\nt3_5122w4\tt3_5122w4\t1472955885\tHow to avoid alienating minority voters: A handy election-year checklist\tetc_initd_yourmom\t-1\nt3_5122w4\tt1_d78p9na\t1472956241\tNo.6: Don\'t [tweet](http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/nov/23/donald-trump/trump-tweet-blacks-white-homicide-victims/) fake racist statistics.\tTrombosaurus\tt3_5122w4\nt3_50yviv\tt1_d78pf4q\t1472956527\tAnd you call Alex Jones crazy for conspiracy theories?\tledhe\tt1_d78ozcc\nt3_510bza\tt1_d78pj8n\t1472956743\tIt\'s an extension of the Trump campaign. I\'m all for viewpoints that I dont agree with, not propaganda.\tchinchilla-khaleesi\tt1_d78ouux\nt3_50yviv\tt1_d78pkto\t1472956831\tThe reporters in that room didn\'t even think of it as a press conference... I don\'t know where you read this stuff but so many Clinton supporters are just as detached from reality as Trump supporters, it\'s really disturbing.\tSam_Munhi\tt1_d7869yu\nt3_5122w4\tt1_d78pmzl\t1472956943\tI can make a checklist on this: * 1. Don\'t threaten to deport everybody you know * 2. Don\'t call everyone in a minority thieves and rapists * 3. Don\'t call everyone in a minority terrorists * 4. Don\'t call every minority stupid -- unable to contribute to the US * 5. Don\'t threaten to go door to door eliminating any and all bad guys only in high crime areas Reasons behind the list: * 1. trump threatens to deport 11M Hispanics living in the US. Chances are most Hispanics know several illegal aliens and I doubt he\'d be too picky about who he deports. You couldn\'t do it through the courts -- there aren\'t enough court rooms in the country to handle it -- so you\'d have to do it without due process. * 2. trump says Mexico only sends rapists and thieves. So if you\'re Hispanic and originally came through Mexico he\'s saying you are a rapist or thief. * 3. trump calls for monitoring of Muslim communities in the US thus implying that all Muslims are potential terrorists. * 4. trump says immigrants are Destroying america on several occasions, that half are criminals. * 5. trump states that he could eliminate crime in Chicago in 1 week. And he\'s clearly talking about high crime black areas. This is not increased police power -- not if you\'re going to do it in 7 days. To do it in 7 days would require a massive on the community reminiscent of Perot\'s plans from 1992: use the military to surround and contain 8-12 city block and search every house, every person. That was Perot\'s plan. Realistically, you\'d have to imply incredible force and personnel all at once, all over a city.\tsaturnengr0\tt3_5122w4\nt3_5122w4\tt1_d78prs2\t1472957199\tHe kinda derped up on that once. The number is already pretty large once you take into account population size. Hell, just mention how they have the highest homicide rate by miles and you have an easy winner. Hehe, you really just meant don\'t tweet statistics at all.\tfeabney\tt1_d78p9na\nt3_5122w4\tt1_d78q8qp\t1472958114\tOnce you take into account income levels, then the color of the skin becomes a non-issue, and people could no longer use it to denigrate a minority group. Posting such statistics without taking into account poverty level, systemic racism, education and a host of other socioeconomic issues is intellectually dishonest and serves no other purpose than to claim the color of one\'s skin determines one\'s morality.\tTrombosaurus\tt1_d78prs2\nt3_50yviv\tt1_d78q9tz\t1472958171\t[Who, me?](https://i.sli.mg/mEpycQ.jpg) The alt-right was created by Putin. Don\'t ask me for proof.\tTesticleElectrical\tt1_d78pf4q\nt3_51062v\tt1_d78qiop\t1472958650\tFrom your posts in /r/Arizona and /r/Tucson, I assume you\'re in Arizona. If so, you can [register online here](https://servicearizona.com/webapp/evoter/selectLanguage).\tTheBadWolf\tt1_d78g29m\nt3_51062v\tt1_d78qpb3\t1472959012\tThat would be great if I had an Arizona DL.\tpickymeek\tt1_d78qiop\nt3_5122w4\tt1_d78qq6c\t1472959056\t> Posting such statistics without taking into account poverty level, systemic racism, education and a host of other socioeconomic issues is intellectually dishonest Socioeconomic excuses are intellectually dishonest. They aren\'t disposed to violence because they are poor, they could just as easily be disposed to being poor because they are violent. The low IQ suggests that. Since IQ *is* correlated enough with poverty and crime to have a good case for being causational.\tfeabney\tt1_d78q8qp\nt3_51062v\tt1_d78qqov\t1472959083\tAZ. And before you link me to the online registration page, please know that to register online you must already have an Arizona DL. Which I must get in person at the DMV. Edit: I\'m not saying it\'s impossible, just **really** inconvenient.\tpickymeek\tt1_d78prnp\nt3_50yviv\tt1_d78qqqb\t1472959085\t> The reporters in that room didn\'t even think of it as a press conference... Because they have an odd allegiance to podiums, apparently. Seriously, explain to me how that isn\'t a press conference.\tKai_Daigoji\tt1_d78pkto\nt3_510bza\tt1_d78qtb6\t1472959223\tI got to choose. My candidate doesn\'t have to buy his support, and I wouldn\'t accept it if he offered. I\'ve already got gainful employment.\tdirtfarmingcanuck\tt1_d78m36w\nt3_50yviv\tt1_d78qxwf\t1472959476\tSeriously? Pre-screened questions with a friendly audience that gave her a standing ovation? That\'s a press conference in North Korea maybe, not the real world.\tSam_Munhi\tt1_d78qqqb\nt3_5122w4\tt1_d78r4ns\t1472959846\tThe word you\'re looking for is causal." "Causational" is not a real word. If you\'re attempting to give "race realism" the veneer of scientific credibility (which it will never attain), try to avoid making unforced errors like that. Especially when making broadly farcical arguments about intelligence (one might see some irony there).']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{fyhr100} : With Sessions scandal, the Alabamafication of America is complete', ">>{EmergencyChocolate} : On a purely soap opera level, Alabama politics is super popcorn-worthy. It's always been fast and loose in that part of the country, but the last couple of years there has been the makings of a pure southern gothic potboiler. [Maddow did a recent expose that really showcases the luridness of it all](http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/sex-scandalized-alabama-gov-appointment-sparks-corruption-outry-874079299568). GQ did a great piece as well: [The Love Song of Robert Bentley, Alabama’s Horndog Governor](http://www.gq.com/story/affair-robert-bentley-alabama-governor) Pretty entertaining stuff for outsiders, but I imagine there's nothing all that funny about it if you live in the state and are having to watch all the corruption swirling around while your communities sink deeper and deeper into poverty.", ">>{watthefucksalommy} : Warning... site is kinda cancerous. Viewing on mobile, can't read more than a paragraph without adverts opening in new windows.", '>>{free_george_bush} : Just so you know, there are now ad blockers for iOS and Android as well.', ">>{seventeenninetytwo} : On PC with NoScript, AdBlock, and PiHole it's actually formatted pretty well. It's sad that this is required to have a decent internet browsing experience.", ">>{fyhr100} : You're welcome! At least Alabama is leading the way in something!", ">>{ndegges} : Hey now, we're pretty good at college football too!", ">>{SchwarzerKaffee} : Psychic spies from Russia try to steal your mom's elation... And if you want these kinds of dreams it's Alabamafication.", '>>{CinnamonJ} : And yet, they keep on voting for the type of asshole.', '>>{UvonTheDeplorable} : >At the heart of it, the Alabama Problem is a simple one to explain: When the majority party fails to hold its own to the same -- or preferably, higher -- standards it holds the opposite party, corruption and incompetence are inevitable.', ">>{berniebrah} : Terrorists from Sweden try to steal your mom's elation And if you want these kind of dreams it's Trumpifornication", '>>{AttackSkunk} : Well, they do have an Я next to their names. That stands for Яeal AmeЯicans, right?', '>>{CpnStumpy} : That Cyrillic character is pronounced ya (not yeah). Enjoy trying to read your post now. Good day.', '>>{OpnotIc} : Anyone know of an Adblock with the power to function through the Reddit official iOS app?', '>>{OlimarsOnion} : Or you could speak with your wallet by supporting sites with a good experience and avoiding sites with a bad experience.', ">>{PrimerGray} : They have been for a while. Crimson Tide isn't a coincidence.", '>>{dmetzcher} : > "Alabamafication of America" That phrase alone *terrifies* me.', '>>{zbchampion} : Democrat in Alabama here: most of them are spoon fed a diet of football, Mountain Dew, Jesus and conservative falsehoods from the day of their birth. They can\'t be convinced to stop voting against their own self interests. Edit to add example: My parents always vote party line Republican. My father is a cancer survivor with a heart condition and diabetes (pre existing conditions). My mother is on Social Security and Medicare. My sister is on our father\'s insurance. They continually vote for people who want to dismantle the only means for any of them to have and afford health care. Their preferred party wants to cut the entitlement programs from which my mother continues to benefit. Ask them why, they say Obama is probably Muslim, and Hillary did something with "the email". (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻', '>>{grrhss} : I have to use "Dixie Oroborous" at least three times today.', ">>{MarbhDamhsa} : Nevada is a little bit like this too. Nowhere near the same scope as in AL, but it's similar", '>>{archaeolinuxgeek} : So I should have been spelling it "Яll quaida" this entire time?', ">>{free_george_bush} : There's a $2 one that claims to block ads in other apps (even those in-game ads) but I haven't tried it. I browse reddit on Safari though.", '>>{WaldoTime} : You need to sit your father down and have a talk about diabetes. Diabetes fucks up your whole body; increased risk of heart disease, vision loss, sensory/motor loss, and kidney failure. If the GOP plan goes through, he might not be able to get insurance. And diabetes treatment costs a lot of money. I have a stubborn father myself. So what if Obama is Muslim, spending as much time with you and sister and your mom should be more important. If he sees that in those terms, he might start to rethink his views. Then, you can unflip that table.', '>>{zbchampion} : That\'s a great idea on paper, but that ship\'s long since sailed. He\'s not interested in my "pinko commie bullshit." Ironic since he now supports the official American Political Party of the Kremlin.', ">>{WaldoTime} : Even if it prolongs his life and makes it less painful? Can your sister get through to him? I have diabetes running in a lot of my family. The end results aren't pretty.", '>>{TheSoupOrNatural} : The issue goes beyond user experience. Advertising can also be a vehicle for malicious actors to gain access to you and your computer. The online advertising industry needs to grow up and agree to work with consumers on that issue, and until they do I will continue to speak with my wallet and outright prohibit their content on my computer.', '>>{jubbergun} : > As a reminder, this subreddit is for civil discussion. LOL, this is the modern version of "We\'ve always been at war with Eastasia." The comments in this sub are hardly ever civil, especially under a post about "dumb southerners."', ">>{jubbergun} : > And yet, they keep on voting for the type of asshole. [Southerner's do love their horndog governors.](http://c2.nrostatic.com/sites/default/files/styles/original_image_with_cropping/public/uploaded/bill-clinton-sex-scandals-hillary-campaign.jpg?itok=W6yOiBz2)", ">>{trotsky102} : I'm pretty moderate, but I live in a small town in Louisiana and people don't realize how accurate your statement is. The people around here make me look life a left wing radical. However, many of the people around here are still intelligent. It's just a lot of cognizant dissonance. It's not understanding the full picture. I really do wish that courses in politics were taught from a young age as separate class from history or social studies. Too many people all around don't understand the system they live in."], ['>>{Harkonnen30} : After Trump’s immigration order, anxiety grows in Florida’s vegetable fields', ">>{Satinduljentagartota} : >“You can actually make a good living — $15, $20 an hour if you’re good at this — but the truth is Americans don’t want to do this work,” said one prominent Florida farmer, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he feared Trump’s administration would target him for speaking out. I don't believe any of that. When I was growing up, we used to pick tobacco - this was a long time ago - and make money for college. It was really hard work, but we were outside, had fun, hooked up, and made some money.", ">>{IczyAlley} : Yeah, and kids still de-tassel corn in Illinois, Nebraska, and Iowa. But that labor isn't enough for the whole harvest. You need immigrant labor to effectively run a farm. Especially in South Florida, where it's MUCH MUCH hotter than in NC, or KY, or wherever you harvested tobacco.", ">>{JustGotOffOfTheTrain} : If farmers are so concerned about Trump's immigration policies then why are rural voters so overwhelmingly Republican?", ">>{Wolf-Head} : They're also poor but vote against things that would help them.", ">>{Satinduljentagartota} : There's a documentary about this. It's called *Idiocracy*.", ">>{The_Write_Stuff} : Florida farmers voted overwhelmingly for Trump. You pay $20/hour and you won't have any trouble finding people to pick tomatoes. For that money I could supply a couple hundred Uber drivers.", ">>{JustGotOffOfTheTrain} : It's like the people on the Texas border that don't want a fence. It's not like Trump was subtle about what he wanted to do.", ">>{Impulse-Buy} : Farmers are concerned about losing their veritable slaves. I hate to say it, but deporting these peoples would increase wages for any that remained or slipped through the cracks, and also create incentives for non illegals to do the work. People say Americans won't do the work, but I know berry farmers, and they don't want Americans, they want slave labor. Yes, we may have to pay more for some of our food. I would be willing to pay more for these foods regardless of who was picking them, if it meant people were getting paid higher wages to do it, whether they be migrants or not.", '>>{Ruslan124} : Because getting rid of immigrants outweighs all else for them.', '>>{gonzone} : So these farmers were working undocumented persons and no one prosecuted them for that?', '>>{Harkonnen30} : I\'m in California and know many "illegal immigrants". They\'re some of the hardest working, dedicated people I know. Not a single one is looking for free handouts from the government.', '>>{Ruslan124} : Long time ago, the world hs changed. You do not need to believe the word of an internet stranger, do some research and find out what happened in Georgia when immigrant labor was driven away. Crops rotted in the fields and unemployed American citizens did not come and fill the labor void. If was a disaster. They had to force prisoner to try and help but it was still a disaster. https://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/05/17/the-law-of-unintended-consequences-georgias-immigration-law-backfires/#3178ce70492a', ">>{h34dyr0kz} : http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/undocumented-workers-immigration-alabama You don't have to believe that one farmer, but would a whole state making the same mistake change your mind?", ">>{dagwood222} : Gee, I kind of remember a couple of years back, iirc Georgia went full bore after illegals and couldn't get most of the crops in.", '>>{turtledan87} : Dems: we need to pay all people a fair living wage whatever the job! Also Dems: we need a permanent underclass of foreign labor we can pay less than minimum or our agriculture will sink 🤔', ">>{knox3} : You should see the anxiety among farm owners! They have to relearn what minimum wage is, figure out what sort of benefits they have to provide legal employees...it's very stressful for them too!", '>>{Ganjake} : The ideal unemployment rate for our country is what we\'re almost at right now. That\'s called full employment. If you think suddenly people are just gonna swoop in and take all these jobs then enjoy paying twice as much for produce as you do now. Inflation is a bitch and those of you with "economic anxiety" better get some economic xanax.', ">>{StonerMeditation} : Trump is a criminal, a cheat, an imposter and a con man. He has ties with the American and Russian MOBs. Trump has had over 3,500 lawsuits, even his wife is suing someone because of slander - which is hilarious considering she's a cheap wannabe porn star. Trump knows how stupid his supporters are and takes advantage of that by lying right to their faces - but they're suckers and want their taxes raised, so Trump and the 1% can get more tax breaks, and his supporters will QUIETLY watch Trump destroy planet Earth with DENIAL of Human-Caused Climate Change, and more wars. Trump plays on their fears, hate, and poverty, but Trump supporters have no courage - are are afraid that Trump might tweet something about them - and keeps up his lies so THEY won't ever see the real Trump.", ">>{Drunkhistoryx} : Things have seriously changed in the last ten years. Kids don't even go outside anymore, much less do ball busting labor for minimum wage. I can't even entice teenagers with $15 an hour and if you can, they suck at the job and complain the whole time, then quit after a day or two.", ">>{Drunkhistoryx} : This is the truth. Get ready for your grocery bill to double, and that's a kind estimate.", ">>{isikorsky} : > most farmers in the US don't rely on illegal immigrants LOL. You have obviously never been here in Florida in the farming communities. Ignore Orlando and visit the rest of the middle of the state around Lake Okeechobee. English is not the primary language. Or maybe you should read about the Coalition of Immokalee Workers, an organization that frees illegal immigrants from slave labor conditions in Florida agriculture. There have [been](http://www.npr.org/2011/08/26/139972669/the-unsavory-story-of-industrially-grown-tomatoes) more than 1,200 people freed from slavery rings in Florida agriculture in the last 10 or 15 years.", '>>{Muppet1616} : http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/texas The vast majority of counties at the border voted for clinton with 20% + margins.', '>>{_Quetzalcoatlus_} : What we really need is comprehensive immigration reform, like what the bi partisan Gang of Eight pushed for a few years back, before it was squashed by boehner. A combination of additional security (not a dumb wall) and a path to citizenship. That would go a long ways in curbing the "slave labor."', ">>{Ganjake} : It's gonna take these people paying 4 bucks for a gallon of milk in bumfuck Florida to see this, I feel bad for them and then I don't because they didn't take the time to learn about consequences of certain policies and realize they're voting against themselves in every way possible.", '>>{bisjac} : Everyone in here is trying to justify cheap labor to justify allowing illegals lol. Must have our slaves!!! (So long as they can illegally vote blue as well)', ">>{Ganjake} : Worked in many restaurants in Florida, same thing for me in every one. Whoever or whatever they were outside of work, they aways busted their ass and deserved to be there. I learned work ethic from my dad, but if I learned it from some of the dishwashers I met I'd be proud.", ">>{zazabar} : I agree on the slave labor part. But there's another viewpoint you have to look at. It might not impact Florida as much, but it definitely affects a lot of agriculture. When you visit farmlands, how many people live out there? Not many, right? If you cut out the illegals, there will suddenly be few people left to work the fields, even if you increase wages. We will need to find a way to entice people to leave cities and go live in farmlands, and that will be very hard.", ">>{Ganjake} : >Dems: we need a permanent underclass of foreign labor we can pay less than minimum or our agriculture will sink 🤔 You're totally missing the point. Nobody is saying that we **need** illegal immigrants, that's absurd. What we're saying is that creating this workforce vacuum causes inflation and chaos. We need to legitimize these jobs more gradually with immigration reform, not kick them all out at once and fuck up all the progress we've made since 2008. You won't find a Democrat who says we need a permanent foreign labor force, cmon man. This is economics 101 and that's what this is about. Nobody is saying illegal immigration is okay. We're saying the way Trump is going about it is going to fuck with our economy hard.", '>>{ozric101} : Idiocy is about voting democrat.. but nice try.', ">>{charmed_im-sure} : a mexican embargo against the united states would disrupt 33% of our food supply, the salinas valley alone provides for 25% ... not sure they understand this ... i mean, tpp wasn't about china, but they think so. so what are we to think? plan? plan hard?", ">>{Harkonnen30} : Most farmers in the United States don't rely on illegal immigrants who work for under-the-table slave wages. This is not a true statement...at least in California, where it was mentioned earlier is responsible for the largest % of the country's domestic food. Come to California and talk to some of the farmers. Almost 100% of the work force is unregistered immigrants. In fact, the immigrants usually make more money than they would in other entry level jobs because the farmers aren't required to pay benefits etc. So under-the-table slave wages isn't a bad gig for a lot of the workers who simply want to send money back to their families in South America.", ">>{Harkonnen30} : Something else that hasn't been bubbled up to the top here is that a lot of undocumented immigrants make pretty decent money because the farmers aren't required to pay for benefits, etc. This means more money to send home to their families in South America which is usually the reason they are working here. The immigrants aren't stupid...it makes very good financial sense for them.", ">>{Harkonnen30} : See my comment below about their wages. They aren't necessarily slave wages at all.", ">>{prolayupse} : You definitely missed the point of that movie. Which isn't surprising.", ">>{sickofthisshit} : It's not just living in rural areas. Much of the workforce is migrant: any particular crop gets picked for a short time, then they move on to where the next crop gets picked. This is not steady work at one location.", ">>{Harkonnen30} : Not that I disagree with you here, but this type of statement is why the left and the right want to kill each other right now. To solve the huge problems we are facing right now, unity is what's required. Some people will follow Trump regardless of what he does. Others just don't know better. The latter are the ones that can be reached, but they're not going to listen if they are insulted right out of the gate.", ">>{Harkonnen30} : > Dems: we need to pay all people a fair living wage whatever the job! I think the Democratic stance is to pay all citizens a living wage by raising the minimum wage. That's entirely different than paying all people a minimum wage. And the argument that Dems are advocating for a permanent underclass of foreign labor is in direct contradiction with the Democratic stance. Dems would much rather have these workers be legal - they've even proposed a path to citizenship for these workers. The Republican argument for disallowing a path to citizenship boggles by mind. Frankly the only argument for that as far as I can tell is pure 100% good ol' fashion racism.", ">>{Harkonnen30} : Are you a farmer? If so, I'm curious to hear your opinion.", ">>{Il_Cortegiano} : Ah yes. The real 'economic anxiety'.", '>>{StonerMeditation} : After 8 years of disrespecting Obama, and 30 years of smearing Hillary Clinton, Conservatives want liberals to respect their 1% corporate stooge, climate-change denier, criminal with mob and Russian ties, sexual predator, reality TV president??? **RESIST Trump**', ">>{sugarfreeeyecandy} : Get ready for news reports that crops are rotting in the field and on the vine as well as spiking food prices. Trump will claim it's all the fault of Democrats. Perhaps he'll make an Executive Order that uses slave prisoner labor to harvest crops?", ">>{zazabar} : That's an even better point, thank you for clarifying on that. How do we convince people who are fresh out of high school to go around farmland to farmland picking and processing crops x% of the year? Gonna have to be some good pay and benefits for that or something."], ['>>{icnoevil} : Hayden: Trump ‘Forgot That He Was President,’ Could See Wiretapping Proof', '>>{icnoevil} : When will this nitwit grow up and realize that he won, barely?', ">>{SaintBrutus} : Trump forgets he's president every Friday at 5 pm.", ">>{banana-viking} : I'm not sure he actually knows what being President means.", '>>{letdogsvote} : Yeah, but that would be fake intel from sad agencies. Much better and more reliable to just go with Breitbart.', ">>{Supermunch2000} : He doesn't need proof, he has people that tell him things and that's enough for him. If he actually read anything or knew anything he could possibly be held accountable - this way he can simply state that he was given the wrong information and, in his head, he did/said nothing wrong. At any rate, **if** he really was wiretapped the approval must have been given by one of those secret courts. **If** it had been given it would have been because there were reasons that involve national security. **If** it involved national security and was kept secret it might have been because there was a plausible reason to give permission to the wiretap. If he actually pressures congress into investigating and they uncover anything, there would be proof that, while a candidate, he was considered a threat to national security.", ">>{cgilbertmc} : If Don-the-Con hears it, **that's PROOF**. That is the only threshold he has.", '>>{digitalboss} : Everyone wants the president to show evidence of his claims, yet they have no evidence of their own claims.', '>>{drugorexic} : He also, as President, can de-classify any document. This is just a diversion to distract from the Russian investigation.', '>>{Shr3kk_Wpg} : I say he is a liar and I can back up those claims.', ">>{SpearNmagicHelmet} : He's a liar and you can't dispute it. He has zero credibility and the respect of the U.S. around the world is cratering. Yeah, we want to see the liar's proof. He said Obama wire tapped him. Not maybe, not if, he said he did it. Now either show us what you got Mr. President or shut the fuck up.", '>>{digitalboss} : I want to see evidence of the claims that the mainstream media are making that his campaign colluded with the Russians. CNN has no evidence. MSNBC has no evidence. ABC has no evidence. They make claims but have no evidence. Show us what you got CNN, or shut up.', ">>{SpearNmagicHelmet} : So it's your belief that all 17 Intelligence agencies are full of shit. Ok, moving on.", ">>{NoelBuddy} : It's the Cobra Commander problem. The guy's popular with the troops for some reason, so you give him some power and he just fucks around with it and screws things up because he's a nitwit. Sure Destro is there to put out the fires and pull the behind the curtain strings, but CC keeps lighting the curtain on fire!", '>>{BrellK} : Hey, Cobra Commander is great at morale and his visions. Who else would have come up with the plan for Weather Domination?', '>>{digitalboss} : > 17 Intelligence agencies They have provided no evidence.', '>>{donnyradwell} : They put the uppers in the jello? Got it', ">>{0moorad0} : He won hugely, and bigly, don't offend our leader comrade.", '>>{mvs2527} : Well that may require him to read the report...', '>>{ahoyakite} : Trump accused Obama of wiretapping Trump tower so he could know whether or not his tower was actually wiretapped in his ongoing investigation. He used his tweet to get the Justice Dept. to tell him what type of evidence they had on him up to this point. Which if true, means that whatever conversation took place could be a huge piece of evidence against him.', '>>{PutinPuppetTrump} : Flynn quit and Sessions lied under oath because of Russia. Nothing to see here!', ">>{ph33randloathing} : It's almost like he doesn't know how to do his job and is incapable of learning.", ">>{PixelBrewery} : No one has said definitively that his campaign colluded with the Russians. 17 intelligence agencies determined that Russia had a systematic program in place to help Trump win, however, and we are finding out that more and more individuals from Trump's campaign met with Russian officials and then lied about it for some reason, and Trump has been siding with Putin in terms of foreign policy. People are drawing conclusions, but still demanding an independent investigation to see if there was collusion.", '>>{digitalboss} : your statement is wrong on many points. get it straight.', ">>{wheresHQ} : That's the problem with journalism and fear mongers. They spit sh*t out to generate clicks. I say both sides start showing evidence for their claims. That'll shut up people on both sides. Americans on both sides, will start to learn more and more about Washington's sh*t. However, I must state that Republicans have been fear mongering for a long time now. Let's just talk about the recent EPA rollbacks. Lead bullets?? Why?? Talk to any hunter and you'll realize that they love the environment the most. Chemical dumping into streams? Destroying America should be considered TREASON. Those companies and individuals would be destroying the very land our fellow American soldiers die for. All of us need to f**ken realize that we're American before republican or democrat or independent.", ">>{unknamed} : I'm convinced of it... he's too dumb to even know what authority he does and doesn't have. And that should be like... probably the #1 thing you know about your job.", '>>{digitalboss} : > that Russia had a systematic program in place to help Trump win I think it is a stretch to say they were trying to help him win.', ">>{Tryhard3r} : Very good point, I hadn't thought of that angle. Would also explain why intel offices were slow in denouncing the claims.", ">>{c0pypastry} : How would he forget that? He's constantly telling everyone how bigly yuge his winning was.", ">>{digitalboss} : The only EPA regulation that I have heard that he will rollback is the so called 2015 Waters of the United States rule which over-reaches to any puddle or stream anywhere. The 1972 Clean Water Act that it was expanded from was meant to cover navigable waterways, not every puddle and stream. Obama selective enforced laws, I didn't hear you bitching then. Republicans are fear mongering? WTF? The dems live and die on fear mongering! They act like Trump is the end of the world. No! Global warming is the end of the world! No! It's the Russians! Hacking our election! End of the world!", '>>{RugerRedhawk} : Do you really doubt that Russia would benefit from the instability of a Trump presidency?', ">>{digitalboss} : It's only been about 1 month. The Senate Democrats are deliberately slowing down his appointments. Take a chill pill dude.", '>>{GoogleCrab} : Have you been living under a rock? There has never been a more unstable presidency in the history of the United States.', '>>{digitalboss} : and if he were a democrat, you would be saying that is his prerogative. bias.', '>>{digitalboss} : and if he were a democrat, you would be saying it is still early. bias.', ">>{GoogleCrab} : It's frightening how much damage he's been able to do so early in his presidency. Being a democrat or republican has nothing to do with it. As far as I'm concerned, ideology-wise, Trump is neither.", ">>{digitalboss} : it is good that he is neither, that is what we want. we want him to do damage. we want him to undo ALL of Obama's bullshit. We want him to not be considered an establishment republican. we want less government. we want less regulations. we want less taxes. we want someone who will not selectively enforce our laws. we want all of the onerous oversized government bullshit GONE!"], [">>{aggie1391} : Clinton camp: Trump guilty of 'actual pay-to-play'", ">>{MrMoogle03} : Yes, but Trump wasn't a Secretary of State.", ">>{johnfrance} : Right but Clinton didn't commit actual pay to play, just rhetorically in the mind of republicans.", '>>{YourMomPutsOut} : >"I was a businessman. I give to everybody. When they call, I give. And you know what? When I need something from them, two years later, three years later, I call them, and they are there for me.” A man of principle. /s', '>>{TavishGauss} : >The Washington Post reported that Drumpf’s foundation did not list a donation to the group backing Bondi in its 2013 tax filings. The Drumpf Foundation instead detailed a contribution to a charity in Kansas with a similar name which was never actually made. Drumpf’s organization additionally listed “no” when asked on a tax form if it had made any political donations that year. >**“It was just an honest mistake,” Jeffrey McConney, a senior vice president at the Drumpf Organization, told the Post Thursday. "It wasn’t done intentionally to hide a political donation, it was just an error.”** I call bullshit', '>>{mrkushie} : How in the world has this not gotten more press?', '>>{DebussySIMiami} : Trump actually paying people for work is pretty rare.', ">>{pramoni} : Whoa, IRS fines---now the suspicion should be raised about what his tax returns do show! Of course he's GOP - so the collaborationists won't question him or his motives. He's another Harding in the making!", '>>{CantStumpTh3Trump} : Trumps constituents were his employees, yours were the American people who elected you Clinton. Not difficult.', ">>{ThornyPlebeian} : Because the beltway media is throwing a tantrum over press conferences. They're punishing Hillary's campaign like aggrieved children until they get what they want.", ">>{mathieu_delarue} : I've realized that every accusation Trump makes about another person is actually something that he is doing. I would absolutely love to play poker with this guy.", ">>{manzoire} : I hate trump, but he's a businessman. It's kinda how it works. But the government is a totally different playing field. Edit: comment is being misinterpreted. Of course I believe its wrong. I hate it when businesses break the laws and avoid taxes and put them in panama. Nobody hates this more than me. I'm just saying that if your in government, kinda like the parents in the house, you are held to a higher standard then the children if that make sense.", '>>{Quinnjester} : Yeah this is worse than anything from Clinton...upvote this.', '>>{farcetragedy} : Exactly my thought. If it were Hillary that did this the press would be huge.', '>>{EndoShota} : The Clintons are too smart to leave direct, damning evidence of their pay-to-play activities, and our legal and social definitions of "corruption" have become so narrow that it\'s possible to get away with just about anything short of cutting a check with "for political favors" in the memo.', '>>{Roseking} : You do know there are two sides right? People in the government can\'t take money from people if the people don\'t offer it to them. By this logic you are saying it is okay to do something wrong because \'It\'s business". Does the excuse "It\'s politics" work for you?', '>>{TavishGauss} : Bribing a state AG to not bring charges against your fraudulent university is "kinda how business works"? Seriously??', '>>{Zlibservacratican} : It seems to work for the Clinton camp, now the Trump camp is trying to use it.', '>>{mrbarky} : That\'s perfect for you isn\'t it? You all get to chant "lock her up" but have a ready made universal excuse to not have actual evidence of actual crimes. Neat!', '>>{Piscator629} : Tonya? Is he going to pop Hillary inna knees?', ">>{MissionStyle} : It's completely OK, because it's Trump, and its only the 194th worst thing he's done.", '>>{MissionStyle} : Not only did Trump overtly bribe an AG, but he has also bragged about it.', ">>{jonnyp11} : Yup, CTR controls this sub, that's why this is at 56% right now. There are just as many Trump plants that it cancels each other out, assuming CTR actually does anything here.", '>>{sourbrew} : Not that what Trump did is excusable but I think arms deals to dictators is probably a far more serious issue.', '>>{Solario_ff14} : Except that access is a whole hell of a lot different from dropping charges.', ">>{Drew4} : >at the Drumpf Organization Yeah, that's some unbiased reporting.", '>>{EndoShota} : >You all get to chant "lock her up" You all? I\'m a liberal, and, while I don\'t like Clinton, I\'m not a Trump supporter, and I don\'t think she should go to jail. >have a ready made universal excuse to not have actual evidence of actual crimes. Actually, the societal and *legal* definitions of corruption have [changed](http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/05/04/404052618/beyond-quid-pro-quo-what-counts-as-political-corruption) substantially in recent decades to where it\'s practically impossible to prosecute someone, and that\'s a problem regardless of who we\'re talking about.', ">>{cl33t} : > I hate trump, but he's a businessman. It's kinda how it works. No. No that's not how it works. You don't get a pass on breaking the law because you run a business.", '>>{rob_banks} : Deny everything, admit nothing and make counter accusations. Such an inspiring leadership.', ">>{youforgotA} : Isn't it only illegal to *take* bribes?", ">>{druuconian} : > he's a businessman. It's kinda how it works. That's kinda how *fraudulent* businesses work. That's how, say, payday lenders work. #leadership", ">>{Starmedia11} : No. Bribing a public official is also a crime. Offering a cop money to let you out of a speeding ticket is illegal. But you need the direct quid pro quo. Did he donate the money intending to get the charges drop, and did she drop them because he donated the money? That's illegal for both of them.", ">>{empanadacat} : I can't even respect people who call him Drumpf. Really? For all the world of shit you can hurl at him, you choose a schoolyard taunt on his family's name and heritage? That's some serious glass house shit.", '>>{PmMePicsOfYourDog} : It\'s a stupid insult, I agree, but it\'s not just because his old name sounds funny. It\'s because he himself taunted Jon Stewart about his family\'s name. "If Jon Stewart is so above it all & legit, why did he change his name from Jonathan Leibowitz? He should be proud of his heritage!"', '>>{TheGreenGuy91} : The best part about clintons people calling trump out for this is that Clinton is one of the people he used to pay for favors. He used to be a huge Clinton supporter/donator.', ">>{woo7} : If there's nothing to admin on pay to play, there's nothing to admit. Here, we have a case of a candidate actually fined by the IRS for the thing he's accusing his opponent of, and yet it barely gets any coverage. Inspiring indeed.", ">>{slinky783} : It's because the Clinton strategy is to deflect by projecting their problems on their opponents and taking opponent positions that have gained favor as their own. People see right through it.", ">>{Wish_Bear} : He told clinton to come to his wedding, she did, because he donates to her. It's the corruptor vs the corruptee. I'm voting Jill Stein.", '>>{MC_Fap_Commander} : The FBI report also notes that Clinton received a March 2011 memo alerting her to an increase of “cyber actors targeting State employees’ personal e-mail accounts.” The e-mail urged State officials to limit their use of personal e-mail accounts for official business since “some compromised home systems have been reconfigured by these actors to automatically forward copies of all composed e-mails to an undisclosed recipient.”\trob_banks\tt1_d78bypm\nt3_510bza\tt1_d78ouux\t1472955462\tJust because you don\'t agree with it doesn\'t mean it should be banned\tskullbeats\tt1_d78cooe\nt3_50yviv\tt1_d78ozcc\t1472955702\tTrump, the DNC hack, Hillary\'s memory problems, they\'re all part of Vladimir Putin\'s scheme to overthrow the western world.\tTesticleElectrical\tt1_d78dykw\nt3_5122w4\tt3_5122w4\t1472955885\tHow to avoid alienating minority voters: A handy election-year checklist\tetc_initd_yourmom\t-1\nt3_5122w4\tt1_d78p9na\t1472956241\tNo.6: Don\'t [tweet](http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/nov/23/donald-trump/trump-tweet-blacks-white-homicide-victims/) fake racist statistics.\tTrombosaurus\tt3_5122w4\nt3_50yviv\tt1_d78pf4q\t1472956527\tAnd you call Alex Jones crazy for conspiracy theories?\tledhe\tt1_d78ozcc\nt3_510bza\tt1_d78pj8n\t1472956743\tIt\'s an extension of the Trump campaign. I\'m all for viewpoints that I dont agree with, not propaganda.\tchinchilla-khaleesi\tt1_d78ouux\nt3_50yviv\tt1_d78pkto\t1472956831\tThe reporters in that room didn\'t even think of it as a press conference... I don\'t know where you read this stuff but so many Clinton supporters are just as detached from reality as Trump supporters, it\'s really disturbing.\tSam_Munhi\tt1_d7869yu\nt3_5122w4\tt1_d78pmzl\t1472956943\tI can make a checklist on this: * 1. Don\'t threaten to deport everybody you know * 2. Don\'t call everyone in a minority thieves and rapists * 3. Don\'t call everyone in a minority terrorists * 4. Don\'t call every minority stupid -- unable to contribute to the US * 5. Don\'t threaten to go door to door eliminating any and all bad guys only in high crime areas Reasons behind the list: * 1. trump threatens to deport 11M Hispanics living in the US. Chances are most Hispanics know several illegal aliens and I doubt he\'d be too picky about who he deports. You couldn\'t do it through the courts -- there aren\'t enough court rooms in the country to handle it -- so you\'d have to do it without due process. * 2. trump says Mexico only sends rapists and thieves. So if you\'re Hispanic and originally came through Mexico he\'s saying you are a rapist or thief. * 3. trump calls for monitoring of Muslim communities in the US thus implying that all Muslims are potential terrorists. * 4. trump says immigrants are Destroying america on several occasions, that half are criminals. * 5. trump states that he could eliminate crime in Chicago in 1 week. And he\'s clearly talking about high crime black areas. This is not increased police power -- not if you\'re going to do it in 7 days. To do it in 7 days would require a massive on the community reminiscent of Perot\'s plans from 1992: use the military to surround and contain 8-12 city block and search every house, every person. That was Perot\'s plan. Realistically, you\'d have to imply incredible force and personnel all at once, all over a city.\tsaturnengr0\tt3_5122w4\nt3_5122w4\tt1_d78prs2\t1472957199\tHe kinda derped up on that once. The number is already pretty large once you take into account population size. Hell, just mention how they have the highest homicide rate by miles and you have an easy winner. Hehe, you really just meant don\'t tweet statistics at all.\tfeabney\tt1_d78p9na\nt3_5122w4\tt1_d78q8qp\t1472958114\tOnce you take into account income levels, then the color of the skin becomes a non-issue, and people could no longer use it to denigrate a minority group. Posting such statistics without taking into account poverty level, systemic racism, education and a host of other socioeconomic issues is intellectually dishonest and serves no other purpose than to claim the color of one\'s skin determines one\'s morality.\tTrombosaurus\tt1_d78prs2\nt3_50yviv\tt1_d78q9tz\t1472958171\t[Who, me?](https://i.sli.mg/mEpycQ.jpg) The alt-right was created by Putin. Don\'t ask me for proof.\tTesticleElectrical\tt1_d78pf4q\nt3_51062v\tt1_d78qiop\t1472958650\tFrom your posts in /r/Arizona and /r/Tucson, I assume you\'re in Arizona. If so, you can [register online here](https://servicearizona.com/webapp/evoter/selectLanguage).\tTheBadWolf\tt1_d78g29m\nt3_51062v\tt1_d78qpb3\t1472959012\tThat would be great if I had an Arizona DL.\tpickymeek\tt1_d78qiop\nt3_5122w4\tt1_d78qq6c\t1472959056\t> Posting such statistics without taking into account poverty level, systemic racism, education and a host of other socioeconomic issues is intellectually dishonest Socioeconomic excuses are intellectually dishonest. They aren\'t disposed to violence because they are poor, they could just as easily be disposed to being poor because they are violent. The low IQ suggests that. Since IQ *is* correlated enough with poverty and crime to have a good case for being causational.\tfeabney\tt1_d78q8qp\nt3_51062v\tt1_d78qqov\t1472959083\tAZ. And before you link me to the online registration page, please know that to register online you must already have an Arizona DL. Which I must get in person at the DMV. Edit: I\'m not saying it\'s impossible, just **really** inconvenient.\tpickymeek\tt1_d78prnp\nt3_50yviv\tt1_d78qqqb\t1472959085\t> The reporters in that room didn\'t even think of it as a press conference... Because they have an odd allegiance to podiums, apparently. Seriously, explain to me how that isn\'t a press conference.\tKai_Daigoji\tt1_d78pkto\nt3_510bza\tt1_d78qtb6\t1472959223\tI got to choose. My candidate doesn\'t have to buy his support, and I wouldn\'t accept it if he offered. I\'ve already got gainful employment.\tdirtfarmingcanuck\tt1_d78m36w\nt3_50yviv\tt1_d78qxwf\t1472959476\tSeriously? Pre-screened questions with a friendly audience that gave her a standing ovation? That\'s a press conference in North Korea maybe, not the real world.\tSam_Munhi\tt1_d78qqqb\nt3_5122w4\tt1_d78r4ns\t1472959846\tThe word you\'re looking for is causal." "Causational" is not a real word. If you\'re attempting to give "race realism" the veneer of scientific credibility (which it will never attain), try to avoid making unforced errors like that. Especially when making broadly farcical arguments about intelligence (one might see some irony there).']]

classify and reply

[">>{Eyad123} : i came from a iPhone 6, the 7 plus battery is amazing. i took my phone off charge at 10am, its 5:17 right now and my battery is at 73% my usage is 4 hr 58 min standby time 6 hr 57 idk if this helps but i really do have amazing battery life on this thing and I'm on snapchat/twitter/spotify/bank apps all the time. no games really. except today i was busy so i wasn't on my phone but my 6 would be at 20%", ">>{PaulWog} : I haven't gotten that good of battery life it seems. It seems like for every 1 hour of usage, I lose 10% battery life. And for every hour of standby, I seem to lose about ~1% battery life. My battery life is acceptable and seems good actually, but it's not amazing. Just trying to figure out if my usage is what other people get, or if I got a short stick battery.", '>>{Chocolations} : i usually get 10-14 hours of usage on a full charge, the battery life is amazing and fantastic as ever.', ">>{Uniqueusername121} : While this may be true, I don't understand how many of the people who are terribly concerned about this didn't care that a previous SoS made millions of dollars while in office, selling weapons and uranium. Trump is going to build some hotels and that's JUST NOT OK, but HRC selling arms to Saudi Arabia for personal gain, that wasn't a problem. Edit: oopsie, forgot I was in r/hillaryclinton. I thought everybody had already seen this highly fact-checked video. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7LYRUOd_QoM http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/the-clinton-foundation-hopelessly-corrupt-or-just-a-lousy-charity/", '>>{Quinnjester} : GOPer opposes early voting because it will boost black turnout', '>>{PurpleProsePoet} : > A Republican lawmaker in Georgia has sparked outrage by suggesting he opposes new Sunday voting hours because they’ll primarily benefit African-Americans—then explaining that he simply “would prefer more educated voters.” >“Michelle Obama comes to town and Chicago politics comes to DeKalb,” Millar wrote. “Per Jim Galloway of the [Atlanta Journal Constitution], this location is dominated by African American shoppers and it is near several large African American mega churches such as New Birth Missionary Baptist.” >He added: “Is it possible church buses will be used to transport people directly to the mall since the poll will open when the mall opens? If this happens, so much for the accepted principle of separation of church and state.”', '>>{dread_lobster} : I love it when Republicans fuck up and say something they honestly believe.', '>>{saint_skank} : I bet it could also have next-gen software that corrupts within a year forcing you to buy their new shit', ">>{WarPhalange} : >Trump is going to build some hotels and that's JUST NOT OK, but HRC selling arms to Saudi Arabia for personal gain, that wasn't a problem. It's because one of these is actually happening and the other never did.", '>>{BeowulfShaeffer} : Who **cares** what he says. We do not need a post here every time he flatulates out of his mouth orifice.', ">>{Chinesedoghandler} : He hasn't been relevant for so long. Where is he even talking from? In this story he had an interview. But every thumbnail has a picture of him at a lectern that was taken over a decade ago. What a hypocritical windbag he is.", '>>{Thongpirate} : That\'s what the republicans would call "just antebellum talk"', ">>{wolflink009} : Ya, that's not going to happen. Maybe if he legalized pot or something I would respect him but he was all talk no action about change.", ">>{IAMAconcernedparent} : Jesus Christ. I've never actually heard the arguments that Republicans give for opposing early voting. Well, here they are: > “Voting even one week early produces less-informed voters and dumbs down the electorate.” That was Christian Adams, a former Bush Justice Department lawyer. Similarly: > The Washington Post columnist George Will, a key shaper of conservative opinion, has called early voting “deplorable.” > “Instead of a community deliberation culminating in a shared day of decision, an election like the one here is diffuse and inferior,” Will wrote last year in reference to a Florida special election that allowed early voting. To call this laughable does an injustice to the concept of comedy. We have been debating this election for *almost 2 years* now. And they are seriously suggesting that allowing a week or even a single *day* of early voting would leave the electorate less informed? Do Republicans ever even listen to themselves?", ">>{CommunismWillTriumph} : Obama is the embodiment of the status quo (that is, the U.S. being an oligarchy). He's branded as a progressive (and the majority of this subreddit buys into that fake image) but is anything but that. He had 8 years to push for progressive reform, but never even lifted a finger. All he did is bomb people and pass a corporate scam of a healthcare system.", ">>{PaulWog} : I should add! I'm at 50% screen brightness. Now at 43%. 4.5 hours of usage 21 hours of standby time (I believe standby time still incorporates usage time in the number, so usage of 1 hour would still add 1 hour of standby) On airplane mode, wifi, sitting in a basement. Not sure if struggling wifi can worsen battery life much.", '>>{Lorenzo_Canyon} : He said he couldn\'t possibly be racist because he\'d received an award from the NAACP. it\'s like the ultimate "I can\'t be racist. I have black friends."', ">>{Dizzymo} : Plus I don't mind the Clinton Foundation, they have a great charity watch rating. Trump Corp is not a charity.", '>>{Uniqueusername121} : Clearly they\'re saints over there at CF, rated higher than THE RED CROSS! There\'s no bribing of charity navigator, who wouldn\'t even assess the CF since 2014- until just before the election, in exchange for an "adjusted" hobnobbing fee. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/09/behind_that_four_stars_rating_for_the_clinton_foundation_from_charity_navigator.html', ">>{TurboChewy} : So, a 3d front facing camera? Sounds awfully gimmicky. If there's a reliable way to translate that information into better quality 2d photos, then power to them, but if it's a gimmicky feature like the half second long videos or facial recognition phone unlock, then why bother? It's been done.", ">>{LeMot-Juste} : Where has Obama been branded a Progressive, specifically? I'd love to see it.", '>>{LeMot-Juste} : Gingrich is in a desperate frenzy to stay relevant.', ">>{knockoutking} : >My plus was at 100% at 6pm yesterday. It's 2pm on the next day, 20 hours later. I'm now at 52%. My usage is 3 hours and 23 minutes, and standby says about 20 hours. I have used safari for about an hour, Reddit app for half an hour, flashlight for 2 minutes, games for about 5 minutes, texting, 50 minutes of call time, 2 minutes of 4K video, and 40 pictures some with flash, and I've checked my phone every 15 minutes while awake. so just to be clear. you have had your phone off the charger for 20+ hours and are complaining because it is at 52% with pretty typical/normal usage? ...and you are unhappy with it or think it is poor battery life?", '>>{NotAnotherNekopan} : And begins the floods of Apple speculations. My favourite... As many times as it\'s been mocked up in the past, I\'d really like to see them pull off an edge to edge screen on all sides. The tech exists to integrate the fingerprint reader into an LCD assembly, Sharp Crystal X (I think) has edge display on three sides, and if you really want to go for it, there\'s also free form displays from "insert_company_name_here". Advantages? None! Gimmick factor? Off the fucking charts. Possibility? Slim to none. In reality they\'re squeezing out an iPhone 7s. No need to be groundbreaking yet, just toss in a new feature or two and tout the advantages with baseless percentages that mean shit all to the average consumer.', '>>{WarPhalange} : Right. Where is the personal gain here? The Foundation is a charity organization that fights AIDS. And then you got this: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/306990-trump-appeared-to-register-eight-companies-in-saudi-arabia >he said at a rally that he gets along well with Saudi Arabia. "They buy apartments from me," Trump said during the Alabama rally. "They spend $40 million, $50 million. Am I supposed to dislike them? I like them very much.”', ">>{WarPhalange} : There are other charity rating organizations that give CF high ratings. But yeah, sure, it's all a big conspiracy.", ">>{dubslies} : No no, early voting is bad! Wikileaks could come out with a game-changer about Clinton any day now. We can't have people voting before that! ^/s", ">>{roboboogienights} : that's always been the reason, but now that we are in the Shackles Off era, they just come right out and say it. I guess that's a good thing in a way- at least we don't have to wonder who the racist creeps are.", '>>{roboboogienights} : > prefer more educated voters Does he mean more of the educated type who think climate change is a liberal conspiracy and reject the theory of evolution?', ">>{A40} : That's always been the case, and why the GOP has opposed it, and tries to restrict voting lists/require complex ID/eliminate people 'vouching' for voters, etc. *Any* improved voter access to the polls hurts the GOP.", '>>{Thongpirate} : or the classic: "I\'m not a racist but...."', '>>{CommunismWillTriumph} : Are you kidding me? His whole 2008 campaign was basically a progressive circlejerk, hence the "change" slogan. Evidently though, "change" for Obama just meant "same as Bush minus the homophobia".', '>>{Uniqueusername121} : How is my theory any more wrong than yours? Edit: why is that one charity rating agency the only one in the news? Can you google "Clinton foundation rating" and in the first few pages of results find a charity other than charity navigator who does give it a higher rating than the Red Cross? I couldn\'t. Is it possible that it\'s the only charity rating agency that the Clinton foundation could get to accept its bribe? I looked because the truth matters to me. If it\'s a good charity, I\'ll say so. The proof is not there. All I\'m saying is, I encourage you to look for facts and evidence rather than simply accept what the Clinton campaign and spokespeople have told you is true. And it\'s not about Trump either- I have no idea what his charity is/does. I\'ll stop looking at CF not because I\'m being redirected to Trump, but to be certain that I have arrived at truth about CF. Lastly, ignoring all points that one cannot find a good argument against is a taught behavior. It\'s good to desire truth. If one wants truth, one loses the need to be "right."', ">>{morbidexpression} : how naive to blame Obama for that as if the Congress and Senate didn't handcuff him. How old are you that you think a President can rule like a King? He pushed every step of the way but centrist dems and the GOP were a roadblock. He did manage to undo a lot of the Bush era damage and if you were a realist instead of monstrously ignorant, you'd appreciate that aspect of his tenure instead of pretending to be a parody of a leftist.", ">>{Eyad123} : i am on 10.2, on 10.1 i have noticed the battery life was not as good. 10.2 might have fixed it! also on nightshift mode and screen brightness is at automatic. 90% of my phone is on wifi, unless I'm driving then its on LTE", ">>{IAMAconcernedparent} : At least that is an argument I can understand (even though it's easy to refute). But that isn't the argument that Will and others are making. Instead, they're saying that early voting doesn't allow enough time for *deliberation*. 2 years is just *barely* enough deliberation, even a single day less is dangerously little time! Actually, we shouldn't even allow a full day of voting. Everyone should vote at 11:59pm on Election Day to allow adequate time to deliberate.", ">>{Vesstair} : Separation of church and state = not establishing a state religion. Preferably it includes not governing based on religious ideals, but his side takes a dim view of that. It's about not forcing a religion on people. This isn't forcing a religion on people. It's forcing politics on them.", ">>{Uniqueusername121} : The Clintons left the White House dead broke, by their own statements, and are now worth $111 million. Where did that money come from? Why did Bill speaking fees increase while Clinton was Secretary of State? https://www.google.com/amp/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/bill-clintons-speaking-fee-overlaps-with-foundation-business-1474408587?client=safari Again, I'm happy to look into Trump's mess too. But it's essential to get at the truth about the Clinton foundation and not mindlessly spout what the campaign told you was true (including about the aids vaccinations). I just feel that my fellow liberals should be open to all of the facts and not just the info (released to the media with a specific narrative and reasoning for said narrative) that align with what they currently believe.", ">>{PaulWog} : I am requesting respectfully that you do not come in here just to post derogatory comments. I don't appreciate it one bit. I am checking to see how other users of the iPhone 7 Plus are doing for battery life. Some have purported using the iPhone even more and getting better battery life, so I want to see various other accounts to get different accounts. It seems that my iPhone drains 10% battery life per hour while the screen is on at ~45%, almost regardless of what I do with it. I am not sure how that compares. Not using my phone and preserving battery life certainly isn't that impressive, just nice.", '>>{yakinikutabehoudai} : You could uh....read the 3 decades of tax returns that are open to the public. Unlike some other people.', '>>{NEDM64} : The tech exists to integrate the fingerprint reader into an LCD assembly Then why does nobody uses that said technology? "with baseless percentages" Explain this, name ONE time Apple gave anyone "baseless percentages".', '>>{Pippkorn} : You might have bad reception. It makes quite a difference to always have 5 bars vs pending between 0-3 all day.', '>>{Deetchy_} : Woo-wee. A standard iphone but with a "better" camera i almost never use because im not an instagram whore? Where do i sign?!', ">>{Uniqueusername121} : I could, but I'd have no idea what I was reading, as I have an accountant who is an expert do my taxes. That's why I listen to people like : http://charlesortel.com/concentrating-on-clinton-foundation-facts. Because they are experts who assess these facts for a living and know what they're talking about. Moreover, it's not one lone voice in the wilderness saying these things: its many people who want the truth out there. Can you say that you want at the truth more than anything else? That you truly open yourself to other possible explanations for what you believe? They're not all right; plenty of Trump people are holding their hands over their ears too. He's no better than her. But at the very least, if you say you are a liberal human being, meaning that you are an open-minded person, then you will listen for alternate truth that may be out there, and listen with an open heart. Edit: I still struggle to understand the downvotes. Truth BAD! What I already think GOOD! Sorry downvoters, but that's how you look when you downvote a call for truth.", '>>{Kalel2319} : Who the fuck cares what this son of a bitch has to say? Why is he still at all relevant in a political climate that rejected "career politicians"?', '>>{Lorenzo_Canyon} : That too. That may be more fitting than my analogy.', '>>{Ree81} : It\'s literally just a reaction towards Samsung\'s "iris" scanner (that\'s actually just an IR camera that looks at your face around the eyes). "Hmm, how can we do exactly the same thing practically but not literally?" Aaaand this is the answer.', '>>{VacationAwayFromWork} : The second link when googling "Charity rating Clinton Foundation" is [from Charity Watch.](https://www.charitywatch.org/ratings-and-metrics/bill-hillary-chelsea-clinton-foundation/478) They had the CF ranked for years. They also rate the CF higher than the American Red Cross as a charity. Looks like the Cost to Raise capital for the CF of 2% pushes the CF to an A rating [while the ARC\'s cost of 30% pulls it down to an A-.](https://www.charitywatch.org/ratings-and-metrics/american-red-cross/360) [Charity Navigator,](https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=16680) for their part, shows that the CF holds a better balance sheet than [the ARC](https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=3277), with higher assets to liabilities and a better working capital ratio. Those are the two main charity watch groups that I\'m aware of, drawing similar conclusions about both the ARC and the CF.', '>>{trump_yes} : I wonder how the GOP ended up with Trump.', ">>{Uniqueusername121} : Did you read my entire set of links? Because Charity Navigator also accepted a negotiated fee of $0 from the Clinton foundation for access to other charitable organizations and CF. That is why I posted it, to show that it's a manipulated score. You're correct that they did audit and score it until 2014, when they stopped until just a few months before the election. At the risk of being repetitive, do you want to know the truth? I challenge you to look for truth, whether I'm right or wrong. Edit: My second link when googling that exact phrase is also from charity navigator, not charity watch. I'm not sure why you get charity watch, because it's not on my entire first page. Unfortunately, that does make me doubt the veracity of your statement. As I've made nauseating clear, I want the truth. 2nd edit: why did this happen? Why did the fees drop? https://nypost.com/2016/11/20/donations-to-clinton-foundation-fell-by-37-percent/", '>>{Rogerss93} : Do you think Mercedes looked at Toyota\'s automatic folding door mirrors and said: "let\'s not bother, it\'s already been done"?', ">>{VacationAwayFromWork} : It's strange that you would call it a manipulated score - that sounds a lot like conjecture. Especially when faced with a matching score from Charity Watch. What do you base it on? The donation that the CF made to Charity Navigator? Charity Navigator had 2015 annual revenue of nearly $7M - you think they're selling ratings for 0.3% of their revenues? That's their business model? What's more likely: that Charity Navigator and Charity Watch each found the Clinton Foundation worthy of a high rating or that they were individually bribed for pennies of their budget? And your post (from the NYPost) regarding a drop in donations... I'm not even sure what your point is. The Foundation became a right wing boogieman and lost some public popularity. The Clintons focused on running for office instead of raising money.", ">>{knockoutking} : I'm not the one who down voted you btw but I'm not at all making derogatory remarks. Having over 50 percent battery left after 20 hours off charger in ~~2016~~ 2017 on ANY mobile is not at all bad batter life. That's all I am saying.", ">>{PaulWog} : No for sure it's good! But I want to know if it's on par with the other 7 Pluses. I have a stalker freak who downvotes everything I do. He has been following me ever since I reported some crazy posts he made in another Reddit thread. Idk how people purport having the screen on for an hour and losing 3-5% battery life and saying the screen is at 50%+. I can't get better than 10% per hour with the screen on (granted I can't do lowest brightness it's just too dim).", '>>{bunnae} : Hmm I think I have about the same usage and standby as you, yesterday. I had about 53% battery left with maybe 6-7 hours of usage, and 12-15 hours of standby. Also on 10.2 and just got this phone a week ago. Same as you with 90% of the time on wifi. I feel like the battery is not living up to what was advertised. I use Reddit, Snapchat and safari heavily but all on wifi.', '>>{Uniqueusername121} : Let\'s assume your points are correct and that the foundation is a top notch A-rated charity. I concede the point (whether I agree or not), I\'ll even concede in the absence of evidence (in fact in evidence to the contrary, see Haitian demonstrations in front of foundation offices- the direct recipients of Clinton "aid"). What is your opinion of the Clintons increasing their worth by $111 million through (let\'s pretend they were legitimate) speaking fees? Is it a liberal, woman/child-focused person who amasses that level of personal wealth considering the poverty around us? Is that what YOU would do with 111$ million dollars? Or would you keep maybe, 100 million for yourself, and donate 11, which is an enormous amount of money to the nation\'s poor? How about 80 Million? 60? 20? What amount???? I\'m not looking for a philosophical argument over the right to amass that wealth, of course they have a right to amass it. I\'m asking you if a liberal person who believes that the poor and the rich should be given equal opportunities in this nation, and that the downtrodden do not deserve to continue living in abject poverty, what amount is OK to amass personally at the expense of the poor? Trump did it. HRC did it. Ignoring all other arguments: let\'s say that i agree with you that the CF is unassailable in its service to the AIDS epidemic in Africa. What amount is simply wrong to possess, when its distribution can do so much good for others? What amount is indicative of greed vs. a desire to serve publicly?', '>>{VacationAwayFromWork} : Your "let\'s assume" and "let\'s pretend" lead-ins are annoying. * You don\'t have to pretend that the Clinton\'s made money through book sales and speaking fees. They did. It\'s in their tax returns. We know the books were sold. We know the speeches were given. * The charity only holds high ratings and has no contrary ratings. * [Haiti is a very unique case](http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323442804578235551543688758) where [no charity seems to do well there](http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-curse-of-charity-in-haiti-1476653140). The Red Cross, who you can\'t believe is rated slightly lower than the CF, [has also drawn large criticism for their lack of beneficial impact in Haiti.](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/10/13/haitians-are-desperate-for-help-but-they-dont-want-it-from-the-american-red-cross/) You clearly believe there are grand conspiracies in the works if we just listen to the proper fringe sources. To your question: should the Clinton\'s make money? Yeah - I think they\'re okay making money [when they give more than 10% per year to charity](http://www.insidephilanthropy.com/home/2016/7/29/the-other-clinton-foundation-a-look-at-bill-and-hillarys-per.html), pay their fair share of taxes, and run one of the world\'s most influential AIDS and women\'s health charities. Not sure why you spent two paragraphs trying to frame that argument.', '>>{Feignfame} : This is what conservatives rely on these days. Low turnout and voter suppression.', ">>{VacationAwayFromWork} : Guys, all he said is that he wants laws to keep black people from voting. And then he even went and clarified that he didn't mean to say black people, he meant the dumb people that live in black communities that go to black churches and black shopping centers. What in the world is wrong with an old white man wanting to structurally restrict the vote of ~~blacks~~ the uneducated. Look at his award. Ok thought so.", '>>{busa1} : What are those images? Apple for sure not going to put their back facing cameras below each other....', '>>{Quinnjester} : Its funny that Trump thinks he can depress dem turnout. When this shit happens we fight even more dumbass.', ">>{Uniqueusername121} : We're not going to agree. I'm happy to read your sources; thanks for responding. Edit: do you think the possibility of influence isn't worth sacrificing .3% of whatever your profit is? Because it's silly to assume that peddling influence isn't happening all over your government. If you think that making 111$ million (as a public servant) and giving away only 10% of that while keeping the rest for yourself is peachy, we will never agree. It's fine to be a capitalist, but then don't call yourself (which granted, you never did, I just assumed a HRC supporter would be) a liberal. :) My premises are annoying because you don't like that the premise of fairness must be assumed. That she (and therefore you) are not what you claim to be is annoying when you figure it out. You're not sure why I wrote two paragraphs framing right vs. wrong (even though you're an HRC supporter and therefore a fair person). I get it; cognitive dissonance is hard. It's just that (back to my original argument) I can't understand why it's ok for one to profit (HRC) and not the other (DT), not that DT is any great person or anything. I guess you have to get there on your own terms. At any rate, kudos to you for even having a conversation. Most people here refuse to acknowledge the discussion at all. At least you're having it. :). Good luck on your knowledge journey.", '>>{NashMcCabe} : Donald Sterling received an NAACP award too. We know how that guy turned out.', ">>{tartay745} : As long as the bus isn't preventing it's members from one party from loading then there isn't a problem. But since he's probably talking about a black church you know what he's suggesting.", '>>{Thongpirate} : Or they say [this...](https://youtu.be/uwyzHbCw7rA)', ">>{holic_2} : Based on your 20 hour stand by, you'd sure hate Android. Your battery is beyond good.", ">>{LeMot-Juste} : No, I was asking where others had branded Obama as a Progressive, not what his campaign said...though I don't remember the word Progressive being used in either.", ">>{Eyad123} : yea i see what you mean, as advertised i think it was 14 hours of usage? i doubt that, but i came from a 6, and I'm more than impressed so far. this is the first plus i had so of course the plus has a bigger battery than a regular 6 or 7", ">>{Kalel2319} : Bombing was bad. Lest we forget of course. Obama however was progressive in regulating financial markets (I didn't like this about him) and speaking out for a more fair social climate. (I loved this about him) We need to do away with all these purity tests.", '>>{staringinto_space} : > He had 8 years to push for progressive reform, but never even lifted a finger. this is a terrible shitty lie', '>>{Negative_Clank} : Hey remember when we had a country going the right direction but it was run by a n*****? Ya. "And how we are in bomb shelters and might die at any moment?" Ya. This is the shit, dog. Fuck that guy.', '>>{howardCK} : is the headline really saying the next generation of iPhones might have next generation features?', '>>{VacationAwayFromWork} : > Edit: do you think the possibility of influence isn\'t worth sacrificing .3% of whatever your profit is? Because it\'s silly to assume that peddling influence isn\'t happening all over your government. Given that they\'re a nonprofit - there is no profit. I think influence peddling for an organization as in the spotlight as the CF for 0.3% of annual revenue (a truly inconsequential amount) for Charity Navigator, with the downside of losing all credibility and maybe going to jail (a truly consequential downside) is ridiculous. No normal person would take that trade. Additionally, the CF was already rated well... so the potentially altered rating from CN "strangely" matches the unaltered rating from CW... unless you think both charity watchdogs are "in on it." > If you think that making 111$ million (as a public servant) and giving away only 10% of that while keeping the rest for yourself is peachy, we will never agree. It\'s fine to be a capitalist, but then don\'t call yourself (which granted, you never did, I just assumed a HRC supporter would be) a liberal. :) The Clintons made $140M (or whatever number you want to use) AFTER they left public office. They didn\'t make that money as public servants, despite their decades of public service. Now that we\'re both describing reality: I see no problem with someone making money ethically. I\'m not sure what being a liberal has to do with it. They made money ethically, gave away three times the national average for their income bracket, and paid above the national average in taxes. While also, of course, volunteering for an influential charity that bears their name. > My premises are annoying because you don\'t like that the premise of fairness must be assumed. That she (and therefore you) are not what you claim to be is annoying when you figure it out. You\'re not presuming fairness - you\'re presuming conspiracy and criminality without evidence. That\'s conjecture and it ought to embarrass you. > You\'re not sure why I wrote two paragraphs framing right vs. wrong (even though you\'re an HRC supporter and therefore a fair person). I get it; cognitive dissonance is hard. I\'m not sure that you do "get it." > It\'s just that (back to my original argument) *I can\'t understand why it\'s ok for one to profit (HRC) and not the other (DT)*, not that DT is any great person or anything. I guess you have to get there on your own terms. Emphasis mine. Your original assertion was that the Clintons made money by using the influence of their office. No one has ever proved that to be the case. Your uranium and weapons ideas include no evidence. Even the author of the Clinton Cash video allows that he [offers no evidence, just that he feels questions should be raised.](http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/week-transcript-clinton-cash-author-peter-schweizer/story?id=30568766&page=2) Your "highly fact checked" video could further be described as "widely discredited" by that fact checking. Is it okay for the Clintons to make money from influence peddling? No. Thankfully we\'ve never found evidence of that taking place. And to their credit, as issues were raised they offered to remove themselves from their namesake charity in order to remove any potential conflict of interest (though again, they draw no direct financial benefit from the charity). Trump has refused to remove himself from his potential conflicts of interest and has further shielded himself from revealing the extent of any possible conflicts of interest through his choice to withhold his tax returns and related financial documents. He and his family have already bumped up against (at the very least) ethical boundaries for influence peddling with the Indian development, the phone call with the Argentinians, and the pushing of Ivanka\'s fashion line during an official event. The above should worry any citizen, regardless of their political affiliation.', ">>{lurkeronebillion} : We get a rare few moments where they take the mask off and let everyone know that behind all the posturing it's really just plain bigotry and stupidity.", '>>{awesomeness0232} : Newt Gingrich is in desperate frenzy to create legacy.', ">>{Uniqueusername121} : I understand that you're not interested in hearing a point of view (well, multiple points of view) that do not correspond with what you already believe. I was not either until events forced me to dig further, as arriving at truth became more important to me than winning arguments such as these. I hope you will turn your critical eye on Clinton and Trump, as an informed population is always a good thing. Luckily, I believe that you are in the minority of people who remain doggedly closed to any negative evidence about Clinton that interferes with your impression of them (one that is remarkably similar to the one the campaign attempted to portray through its bought and sold MSM). Again, Trump is no better, I simply can't understand why he needs to be even brought up in a discussion of the Clinton Foundation (yet somehow he always is, and it's never understood as an effort at deflection). Again, thank you for engaging in a respectful dialogue. Best wishes.", '>>{objectivedesigning} : Thank you. Yes, this man is irrelevant.', '>>{NotAnotherNekopan} : Because R&D time and costs. Phone manufacturers lag behind the latest in technology by at least a year or two because it takes time to integrate the hardware and software into existing frameworks. It must also be tested, and be purchased in high volumes, so a supply chain with the manufacturer must be established. Tim Cook *loves* his percentages. With the release of the recent MacBook Pro laptops, the presentation was decorated with "X% faster this" and "X% slimmer that". But, what does 18% slimmer *actually do* for the customer if it\'s at the expense of common, ubiquitous ports? Why make the iPhone slimmer if the battery still doesn\'t hold up to competitors? There\'s a point where consumers need to realize that percentage figures really just mean nothing to them, but serve only to help sell a new product for a higher price.', '>>{Jokrtothethief} : Or some maniac comes along and rips the mask off and the face comes along with it. A la Trump.', '>>{RxVote} : Then you might want to search U-Tube and listen to Michele Bachmann.', ">>{TurboChewy} : If it was something that was recieved badly and didn't work well, yeah. The 3DS did it, and nobody ever used it. Facial unlock is there on a lot of phones/laptops, and it's just a gimmick, nobody really uses it. It works but it's really insecure. I'm curious to see if Apple is going through with this, they're not ones to add unnecessary features, so I wonder how they'll justify this.", '>>{aetius476} : Obama in a desperate frenzy to save *country*. It\'s spelled "country" Newt.', ">>{Rogerss93} : > and it's just a gimmick, nobody really uses it. Fingerprint scanners were just a gimmick until TouchID revolutionised the way we unlock mobile devices", '>>{VacationAwayFromWork} : You\'re hardly being respectful by continuing to insinuate that I\'m both ignorant and interested in remaining so. "Blissfully biased" isn\'t a nice thing to say about a person. You\'re making shit up and peddling it as truth, using "whataboutClinton" which went deathly out of style about two weeks ago, and generally ignoring the advancement of a conversation to repeat "I understand you enjoy being blind, wait till you see this link from Alex Jones tho." My best wish is that you\'d stop posting this BS. Maybe that\'ll come true.', '>>{Uniqueusername121} : My apologies if I gave the impression that I respect your point of view. "Blissfully biased" is an ignorant and foolish thing to be. Since I\'ve not said anything positive regarding Trump, you have nothing else to throw at me that will stick, including your nonsensical Alex Jones reference. That\'s the difference, you see. I wasn\'t trying to be respectful of your blind opinion, I was trying to to be mature and move along, something of which you\'ve now proven incapable. My bet is that you\'ll have a response, but I\'m tired of talking in circles with you.', ">>{MrRtd} : Mask? In this case it's more like a white pointy hood.", '>>{mindlessrabble} : Who cares what that child molesting, adulterous, open-marriage advocate, swindler thinks.', ">>{TurboChewy} : Not at all. I've had a fingerprint scanner on my laptop and I used it every day for years before it came out on mobile devices. Nobody thought they were gimmicky, they were a useful tool on tons of devices. Tried and tested.", ">>{dubslies} : To be fair, what Rick Hasan said in that article *(a respected election/CF lawyer)* seems to make sense and fits with shared concepts of each ideology. Liberals want to be more inclusive, to have more people voting, and conservatives want more informed people voting, and for conservatives, while I do think they *believe* this, I just think it's ironic given the stupidity and fact-free arguments their voter base is prone to - the birthers for instance, but that's another discussion. There is one reason that overshadows all others (imo) with this among Republicans lawmakers - It's power. They don't want more people voting because the people most likely to vote if it was made easier are usually heavily Democratic. It's been so blatantly obvious since 2011. The first black president gets elected, then reelected, with record minority turnout, and suddenly voter fraud is a problem and we must restrict voting? Really? Give me a break. It's so transparent, especially with study after study showing fraud to basically be a non-issue. The GOP knows almost every growing demographic is turning on them hard, and they are trying to cling to power by suppressing those growing voter blocs.", ">>{WarPhalange} : >Moreover, it's not one lone voice in the wilderness saying these things: its many people who want the truth out there. So if everybody on the Left said Trump raped a girl... you'd believe them because it's many people who want the truth out there?", '>>{Uniqueusername121} : That\'s a really weird question. If Trump raped a girl, the only people who would know wb hether it really took place would be Trump and his victim. (Although I would find the timing highly suspect if it was reported days before an election, particularly if the rape took place years ago, and with an unwilling to see" audience). But if these strange witnesses corroborated the victim\'s statement, and neither victim nor witnesses stood to gain anything from making a false report, then of course I would believe the account.', '>>{SilentPede} : I had an android since the Droid Incredible....always rooted and romed. Only bought phones that had an unlocked bootloader. Was quite the android snob. Got an iPhone 6S 6 months ago. No idea why I waited so long. Everything just *works*. And it is faster than any android I ever owned. Personal preference of course, but I went down the android path. I unashamedly admit the iphone is just better.', '>>{Rogerss93} : They were slow as fuck due to the fact they often depended on third party drivers. No phone manufacturer had any interest in prodding that technology with their expensive R&D sticks until Apple came along and integrated one of the most seamless fingerprint sensors any consumer device had ever seen. Apple could nail facial recognition on their first attempt like they did with TouchID, and create a new norm for flagship devices (I know Samsung have already attempted it). Alternatively it could end terribly and be the new Siri.', '>>{Deetchy_} : Just frustrated about the lack of creativity on these new "innovative" phones.', '>>{NEDM64} : > Because R&D time and costs. Phone manufacturers lag behind the latest in technology by at least a year or two because it takes time to integrate the hardware and software into existing frameworks. It must also be tested, and be purchased in high volumes, so a supply chain with the manufacturer must be established. No shit sherlock. > Tim Cook loves his percentages. With the release of the recent MacBook Pro laptops, the presentation was decorated with "X% faster this" and "X% slimmer that". And those numbers are based in real benchmarks, and X% slimmer means it\'s X% slimmer. > But, what does 18% slimmer actually do for the customer if it\'s at the expense of common, ubiquitous ports? Outdated you mean, USB-C is here for a long time now. It\'s not Apple\'s fault that competitors are selling outdated tech. > Why make the iPhone slimmer if the battery still doesn\'t hold up to competitors? http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph10685/83902.png Apple haters… > There\'s a point where consumers need to realize that percentage figures really just mean nothing to them, but serve only to help sell a new product for a higher price. Your opinion, and it\'s wrong.', '>>{kirashi3} : Ah Sony, still hard at work developing new cameras, I see.', ">>{TurboChewy} : It's possible. While Siri was definitely a bust, I can't blame Apple for trying. They jumped the gun, releasing it when it wasn't ready. Today, voice recognition is pretty damn accurate, if Siri had come out this gen, it'd have a much better reputation. I can't say the same level exists yet for image recognition. We'll see, but I hope it isn't central to the phones operation.", ">>{rommaster14} : The Motorola atrix would like to have a word with you about fingerprint scanners in phone technology. Apples works better but it came out two or three years later so it's expected.", '>>{Cheeseman1478} : Live Photos are cool, my friends and I all love looking at love photos from group pictures and seeing the change we make right after the picture.', ">>{TurboChewy} : To each his own, I guess. I'm sure there are good ways for them to be used, but some people literally just take every picture like that.", '>>{emmagreen9122} : Apple hasn’t even confirmed that whether it will apple iPhone 8 or iPhone X, as 2017 also marks the 10th anniversary of the iPhone. Off course, the phone will have the better camera than its predecessor but we will have to see whether they can beat the dual-lens feature or not.', '>>{osmdroid} : Its not about android, its about NEXUS/PIXEL , they are the best of android. Once you use nexus you never look back. I hate samsuck phones way more than i hate iPhones. Best of android, nexus 6p/5x & pixel x/xl', ">>{JoeKkerr} : Real world differs from benchmark applefan. I've had a 6s, believe me even with moderate to light use i struggled to get past 3PM with 20% battery. I even tried 6s plus, its battery life was amazing but as soon as i played games and a bit of camera work, it automatically became shit. Switched to S7 edge.", '>>{youshedo} : i am just waiting for the next iphone to have a built in selfie stick.', '>>{creeldeel} : I am really hoping for more dongles and incompatible charging cables', ">>{TheMagicMarkerMan} : Umm, that's a useful addition, these other things are gimmicks. Apple needs to get back to giving us things we didn't know we wanted and stop playing keeping up with the joneses.", '>>{Rogerss93} : What makes automatically folding mirrors any more useful than automatically unlocking your phone by looking at it?', '>>{fordman84} : Save that and give me a removable battery. Or Expandable memory.', ">>{ttile} : Personally I'd rather believe an unbiased third party tech review site (one that is the arguably one of the most respected out there) rather than some guy on the internet.", ">>{ttile} : If it doesn't reliably work can it really be considered a feature?", '>>{rommaster14} : Mine worked the whole two years I had the phone, even the great and powerful Apple has mis steps. They also consider the lack of something to be a feature...', ">>{ttile} : Even today fingerprint sensors aren't perfect. Also we know there were big advancements in the underlying tech that got us to the usability level as today. Couple that with reviews of the atrix talking about it's unreliable fingerprint sensor and it makes me take your comment with a heavy grain of salt.", '>>{rommaster14} : For sure man, I think the point is that the poster implied apple pioneered the technology and up until then nobody had made anything worth talking about. That is simply not true and why I replied, Apple makes an awesome device and their scanners are the best in the normal phone market these days.', '>>{choose868} : do we also need to sell kidney for this one also?', ">>{picardo85} : I'm waiting for the next iphone to have a god damn 3.5mm jack."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{Uniqueusername121} : While this may be true, I don't understand how many of the people who are terribly concerned about this didn't care that a previous SoS made millions of dollars while in office, selling weapons and uranium. Trump is going to build some hotels and that's JUST NOT OK, but HRC selling arms to Saudi Arabia for personal gain, that wasn't a problem. Edit: oopsie, forgot I was in r/hillaryclinton. I thought everybody had already seen this highly fact-checked video. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7LYRUOd_QoM http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/the-clinton-foundation-hopelessly-corrupt-or-just-a-lousy-charity/", ">>{WarPhalange} : >Trump is going to build some hotels and that's JUST NOT OK, but HRC selling arms to Saudi Arabia for personal gain, that wasn't a problem. It's because one of these is actually happening and the other never did.", ">>{Dizzymo} : Plus I don't mind the Clinton Foundation, they have a great charity watch rating. Trump Corp is not a charity.", '>>{Uniqueusername121} : Clearly they\'re saints over there at CF, rated higher than THE RED CROSS! There\'s no bribing of charity navigator, who wouldn\'t even assess the CF since 2014- until just before the election, in exchange for an "adjusted" hobnobbing fee. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/09/behind_that_four_stars_rating_for_the_clinton_foundation_from_charity_navigator.html', '>>{WarPhalange} : Right. Where is the personal gain here? The Foundation is a charity organization that fights AIDS. And then you got this: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/306990-trump-appeared-to-register-eight-companies-in-saudi-arabia >he said at a rally that he gets along well with Saudi Arabia. "They buy apartments from me," Trump said during the Alabama rally. "They spend $40 million, $50 million. Am I supposed to dislike them? I like them very much.”', ">>{WarPhalange} : There are other charity rating organizations that give CF high ratings. But yeah, sure, it's all a big conspiracy.", '>>{Uniqueusername121} : How is my theory any more wrong than yours? Edit: why is that one charity rating agency the only one in the news? Can you google "Clinton foundation rating" and in the first few pages of results find a charity other than charity navigator who does give it a higher rating than the Red Cross? I couldn\'t. Is it possible that it\'s the only charity rating agency that the Clinton foundation could get to accept its bribe? I looked because the truth matters to me. If it\'s a good charity, I\'ll say so. The proof is not there. All I\'m saying is, I encourage you to look for facts and evidence rather than simply accept what the Clinton campaign and spokespeople have told you is true. And it\'s not about Trump either- I have no idea what his charity is/does. I\'ll stop looking at CF not because I\'m being redirected to Trump, but to be certain that I have arrived at truth about CF. Lastly, ignoring all points that one cannot find a good argument against is a taught behavior. It\'s good to desire truth. If one wants truth, one loses the need to be "right."', ">>{Uniqueusername121} : The Clintons left the White House dead broke, by their own statements, and are now worth $111 million. Where did that money come from? Why did Bill speaking fees increase while Clinton was Secretary of State? https://www.google.com/amp/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/bill-clintons-speaking-fee-overlaps-with-foundation-business-1474408587?client=safari Again, I'm happy to look into Trump's mess too. But it's essential to get at the truth about the Clinton foundation and not mindlessly spout what the campaign told you was true (including about the aids vaccinations). I just feel that my fellow liberals should be open to all of the facts and not just the info (released to the media with a specific narrative and reasoning for said narrative) that align with what they currently believe.", '>>{yakinikutabehoudai} : You could uh....read the 3 decades of tax returns that are open to the public. Unlike some other people.', ">>{Uniqueusername121} : I could, but I'd have no idea what I was reading, as I have an accountant who is an expert do my taxes. That's why I listen to people like : http://charlesortel.com/concentrating-on-clinton-foundation-facts. Because they are experts who assess these facts for a living and know what they're talking about. Moreover, it's not one lone voice in the wilderness saying these things: its many people who want the truth out there. Can you say that you want at the truth more than anything else? That you truly open yourself to other possible explanations for what you believe? They're not all right; plenty of Trump people are holding their hands over their ears too. He's no better than her. But at the very least, if you say you are a liberal human being, meaning that you are an open-minded person, then you will listen for alternate truth that may be out there, and listen with an open heart. Edit: I still struggle to understand the downvotes. Truth BAD! What I already think GOOD! Sorry downvoters, but that's how you look when you downvote a call for truth.", '>>{VacationAwayFromWork} : The second link when googling "Charity rating Clinton Foundation" is [from Charity Watch.](https://www.charitywatch.org/ratings-and-metrics/bill-hillary-chelsea-clinton-foundation/478) They had the CF ranked for years. They also rate the CF higher than the American Red Cross as a charity. Looks like the Cost to Raise capital for the CF of 2% pushes the CF to an A rating [while the ARC\'s cost of 30% pulls it down to an A-.](https://www.charitywatch.org/ratings-and-metrics/american-red-cross/360) [Charity Navigator,](https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=16680) for their part, shows that the CF holds a better balance sheet than [the ARC](https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=3277), with higher assets to liabilities and a better working capital ratio. Those are the two main charity watch groups that I\'m aware of, drawing similar conclusions about both the ARC and the CF.', ">>{Uniqueusername121} : Did you read my entire set of links? Because Charity Navigator also accepted a negotiated fee of $0 from the Clinton foundation for access to other charitable organizations and CF. That is why I posted it, to show that it's a manipulated score. You're correct that they did audit and score it until 2014, when they stopped until just a few months before the election. At the risk of being repetitive, do you want to know the truth? I challenge you to look for truth, whether I'm right or wrong. Edit: My second link when googling that exact phrase is also from charity navigator, not charity watch. I'm not sure why you get charity watch, because it's not on my entire first page. Unfortunately, that does make me doubt the veracity of your statement. As I've made nauseating clear, I want the truth. 2nd edit: why did this happen? Why did the fees drop? https://nypost.com/2016/11/20/donations-to-clinton-foundation-fell-by-37-percent/", ">>{VacationAwayFromWork} : It's strange that you would call it a manipulated score - that sounds a lot like conjecture. Especially when faced with a matching score from Charity Watch. What do you base it on? The donation that the CF made to Charity Navigator? Charity Navigator had 2015 annual revenue of nearly $7M - you think they're selling ratings for 0.3% of their revenues? That's their business model? What's more likely: that Charity Navigator and Charity Watch each found the Clinton Foundation worthy of a high rating or that they were individually bribed for pennies of their budget? And your post (from the NYPost) regarding a drop in donations... I'm not even sure what your point is. The Foundation became a right wing boogieman and lost some public popularity. The Clintons focused on running for office instead of raising money.", '>>{Uniqueusername121} : Let\'s assume your points are correct and that the foundation is a top notch A-rated charity. I concede the point (whether I agree or not), I\'ll even concede in the absence of evidence (in fact in evidence to the contrary, see Haitian demonstrations in front of foundation offices- the direct recipients of Clinton "aid"). What is your opinion of the Clintons increasing their worth by $111 million through (let\'s pretend they were legitimate) speaking fees? Is it a liberal, woman/child-focused person who amasses that level of personal wealth considering the poverty around us? Is that what YOU would do with 111$ million dollars? Or would you keep maybe, 100 million for yourself, and donate 11, which is an enormous amount of money to the nation\'s poor? How about 80 Million? 60? 20? What amount???? I\'m not looking for a philosophical argument over the right to amass that wealth, of course they have a right to amass it. I\'m asking you if a liberal person who believes that the poor and the rich should be given equal opportunities in this nation, and that the downtrodden do not deserve to continue living in abject poverty, what amount is OK to amass personally at the expense of the poor? Trump did it. HRC did it. Ignoring all other arguments: let\'s say that i agree with you that the CF is unassailable in its service to the AIDS epidemic in Africa. What amount is simply wrong to possess, when its distribution can do so much good for others? What amount is indicative of greed vs. a desire to serve publicly?', '>>{VacationAwayFromWork} : Your "let\'s assume" and "let\'s pretend" lead-ins are annoying. * You don\'t have to pretend that the Clinton\'s made money through book sales and speaking fees. They did. It\'s in their tax returns. We know the books were sold. We know the speeches were given. * The charity only holds high ratings and has no contrary ratings. * [Haiti is a very unique case](http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323442804578235551543688758) where [no charity seems to do well there](http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-curse-of-charity-in-haiti-1476653140). The Red Cross, who you can\'t believe is rated slightly lower than the CF, [has also drawn large criticism for their lack of beneficial impact in Haiti.](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/10/13/haitians-are-desperate-for-help-but-they-dont-want-it-from-the-american-red-cross/) You clearly believe there are grand conspiracies in the works if we just listen to the proper fringe sources. To your question: should the Clinton\'s make money? Yeah - I think they\'re okay making money [when they give more than 10% per year to charity](http://www.insidephilanthropy.com/home/2016/7/29/the-other-clinton-foundation-a-look-at-bill-and-hillarys-per.html), pay their fair share of taxes, and run one of the world\'s most influential AIDS and women\'s health charities. Not sure why you spent two paragraphs trying to frame that argument.', ">>{Uniqueusername121} : We're not going to agree. I'm happy to read your sources; thanks for responding. Edit: do you think the possibility of influence isn't worth sacrificing .3% of whatever your profit is? Because it's silly to assume that peddling influence isn't happening all over your government. If you think that making 111$ million (as a public servant) and giving away only 10% of that while keeping the rest for yourself is peachy, we will never agree. It's fine to be a capitalist, but then don't call yourself (which granted, you never did, I just assumed a HRC supporter would be) a liberal. :) My premises are annoying because you don't like that the premise of fairness must be assumed. That she (and therefore you) are not what you claim to be is annoying when you figure it out. You're not sure why I wrote two paragraphs framing right vs. wrong (even though you're an HRC supporter and therefore a fair person). I get it; cognitive dissonance is hard. It's just that (back to my original argument) I can't understand why it's ok for one to profit (HRC) and not the other (DT), not that DT is any great person or anything. I guess you have to get there on your own terms. At any rate, kudos to you for even having a conversation. Most people here refuse to acknowledge the discussion at all. At least you're having it. :). Good luck on your knowledge journey.", '>>{VacationAwayFromWork} : > Edit: do you think the possibility of influence isn\'t worth sacrificing .3% of whatever your profit is? Because it\'s silly to assume that peddling influence isn\'t happening all over your government. Given that they\'re a nonprofit - there is no profit. I think influence peddling for an organization as in the spotlight as the CF for 0.3% of annual revenue (a truly inconsequential amount) for Charity Navigator, with the downside of losing all credibility and maybe going to jail (a truly consequential downside) is ridiculous. No normal person would take that trade. Additionally, the CF was already rated well... so the potentially altered rating from CN "strangely" matches the unaltered rating from CW... unless you think both charity watchdogs are "in on it." > If you think that making 111$ million (as a public servant) and giving away only 10% of that while keeping the rest for yourself is peachy, we will never agree. It\'s fine to be a capitalist, but then don\'t call yourself (which granted, you never did, I just assumed a HRC supporter would be) a liberal. :) The Clintons made $140M (or whatever number you want to use) AFTER they left public office. They didn\'t make that money as public servants, despite their decades of public service. Now that we\'re both describing reality: I see no problem with someone making money ethically. I\'m not sure what being a liberal has to do with it. They made money ethically, gave away three times the national average for their income bracket, and paid above the national average in taxes. While also, of course, volunteering for an influential charity that bears their name. > My premises are annoying because you don\'t like that the premise of fairness must be assumed. That she (and therefore you) are not what you claim to be is annoying when you figure it out. You\'re not presuming fairness - you\'re presuming conspiracy and criminality without evidence. That\'s conjecture and it ought to embarrass you. > You\'re not sure why I wrote two paragraphs framing right vs. wrong (even though you\'re an HRC supporter and therefore a fair person). I get it; cognitive dissonance is hard. I\'m not sure that you do "get it." > It\'s just that (back to my original argument) *I can\'t understand why it\'s ok for one to profit (HRC) and not the other (DT)*, not that DT is any great person or anything. I guess you have to get there on your own terms. Emphasis mine. Your original assertion was that the Clintons made money by using the influence of their office. No one has ever proved that to be the case. Your uranium and weapons ideas include no evidence. Even the author of the Clinton Cash video allows that he [offers no evidence, just that he feels questions should be raised.](http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/week-transcript-clinton-cash-author-peter-schweizer/story?id=30568766&page=2) Your "highly fact checked" video could further be described as "widely discredited" by that fact checking. Is it okay for the Clintons to make money from influence peddling? No. Thankfully we\'ve never found evidence of that taking place. And to their credit, as issues were raised they offered to remove themselves from their namesake charity in order to remove any potential conflict of interest (though again, they draw no direct financial benefit from the charity). Trump has refused to remove himself from his potential conflicts of interest and has further shielded himself from revealing the extent of any possible conflicts of interest through his choice to withhold his tax returns and related financial documents. He and his family have already bumped up against (at the very least) ethical boundaries for influence peddling with the Indian development, the phone call with the Argentinians, and the pushing of Ivanka\'s fashion line during an official event. The above should worry any citizen, regardless of their political affiliation.', ">>{Uniqueusername121} : I understand that you're not interested in hearing a point of view (well, multiple points of view) that do not correspond with what you already believe. I was not either until events forced me to dig further, as arriving at truth became more important to me than winning arguments such as these. I hope you will turn your critical eye on Clinton and Trump, as an informed population is always a good thing. Luckily, I believe that you are in the minority of people who remain doggedly closed to any negative evidence about Clinton that interferes with your impression of them (one that is remarkably similar to the one the campaign attempted to portray through its bought and sold MSM). Again, Trump is no better, I simply can't understand why he needs to be even brought up in a discussion of the Clinton Foundation (yet somehow he always is, and it's never understood as an effort at deflection). Again, thank you for engaging in a respectful dialogue. Best wishes.", '>>{VacationAwayFromWork} : You\'re hardly being respectful by continuing to insinuate that I\'m both ignorant and interested in remaining so. "Blissfully biased" isn\'t a nice thing to say about a person. You\'re making shit up and peddling it as truth, using "whataboutClinton" which went deathly out of style about two weeks ago, and generally ignoring the advancement of a conversation to repeat "I understand you enjoy being blind, wait till you see this link from Alex Jones tho." My best wish is that you\'d stop posting this BS. Maybe that\'ll come true.', '>>{Uniqueusername121} : My apologies if I gave the impression that I respect your point of view. "Blissfully biased" is an ignorant and foolish thing to be. Since I\'ve not said anything positive regarding Trump, you have nothing else to throw at me that will stick, including your nonsensical Alex Jones reference. That\'s the difference, you see. I wasn\'t trying to be respectful of your blind opinion, I was trying to to be mature and move along, something of which you\'ve now proven incapable. My bet is that you\'ll have a response, but I\'m tired of talking in circles with you.', ">>{WarPhalange} : >Moreover, it's not one lone voice in the wilderness saying these things: its many people who want the truth out there. So if everybody on the Left said Trump raped a girl... you'd believe them because it's many people who want the truth out there?", '>>{Uniqueusername121} : That\'s a really weird question. If Trump raped a girl, the only people who would know wb hether it really took place would be Trump and his victim. (Although I would find the timing highly suspect if it was reported days before an election, particularly if the rape took place years ago, and with an unwilling to see" audience). But if these strange witnesses corroborated the victim\'s statement, and neither victim nor witnesses stood to gain anything from making a false report, then of course I would believe the account.'], [">>{Eyad123} : i came from a iPhone 6, the 7 plus battery is amazing. i took my phone off charge at 10am, its 5:17 right now and my battery is at 73% my usage is 4 hr 58 min standby time 6 hr 57 idk if this helps but i really do have amazing battery life on this thing and I'm on snapchat/twitter/spotify/bank apps all the time. no games really. except today i was busy so i wasn't on my phone but my 6 would be at 20%", ">>{PaulWog} : I haven't gotten that good of battery life it seems. It seems like for every 1 hour of usage, I lose 10% battery life. And for every hour of standby, I seem to lose about ~1% battery life. My battery life is acceptable and seems good actually, but it's not amazing. Just trying to figure out if my usage is what other people get, or if I got a short stick battery.", '>>{Chocolations} : i usually get 10-14 hours of usage on a full charge, the battery life is amazing and fantastic as ever.', ">>{PaulWog} : I should add! I'm at 50% screen brightness. Now at 43%. 4.5 hours of usage 21 hours of standby time (I believe standby time still incorporates usage time in the number, so usage of 1 hour would still add 1 hour of standby) On airplane mode, wifi, sitting in a basement. Not sure if struggling wifi can worsen battery life much.", ">>{knockoutking} : >My plus was at 100% at 6pm yesterday. It's 2pm on the next day, 20 hours later. I'm now at 52%. My usage is 3 hours and 23 minutes, and standby says about 20 hours. I have used safari for about an hour, Reddit app for half an hour, flashlight for 2 minutes, games for about 5 minutes, texting, 50 minutes of call time, 2 minutes of 4K video, and 40 pictures some with flash, and I've checked my phone every 15 minutes while awake. so just to be clear. you have had your phone off the charger for 20+ hours and are complaining because it is at 52% with pretty typical/normal usage? ...and you are unhappy with it or think it is poor battery life?", ">>{Eyad123} : i am on 10.2, on 10.1 i have noticed the battery life was not as good. 10.2 might have fixed it! also on nightshift mode and screen brightness is at automatic. 90% of my phone is on wifi, unless I'm driving then its on LTE", ">>{PaulWog} : I am requesting respectfully that you do not come in here just to post derogatory comments. I don't appreciate it one bit. I am checking to see how other users of the iPhone 7 Plus are doing for battery life. Some have purported using the iPhone even more and getting better battery life, so I want to see various other accounts to get different accounts. It seems that my iPhone drains 10% battery life per hour while the screen is on at ~45%, almost regardless of what I do with it. I am not sure how that compares. Not using my phone and preserving battery life certainly isn't that impressive, just nice.", '>>{Pippkorn} : You might have bad reception. It makes quite a difference to always have 5 bars vs pending between 0-3 all day.', ">>{knockoutking} : I'm not the one who down voted you btw but I'm not at all making derogatory remarks. Having over 50 percent battery left after 20 hours off charger in ~~2016~~ 2017 on ANY mobile is not at all bad batter life. That's all I am saying.", ">>{PaulWog} : No for sure it's good! But I want to know if it's on par with the other 7 Pluses. I have a stalker freak who downvotes everything I do. He has been following me ever since I reported some crazy posts he made in another Reddit thread. Idk how people purport having the screen on for an hour and losing 3-5% battery life and saying the screen is at 50%+. I can't get better than 10% per hour with the screen on (granted I can't do lowest brightness it's just too dim).", '>>{bunnae} : Hmm I think I have about the same usage and standby as you, yesterday. I had about 53% battery left with maybe 6-7 hours of usage, and 12-15 hours of standby. Also on 10.2 and just got this phone a week ago. Same as you with 90% of the time on wifi. I feel like the battery is not living up to what was advertised. I use Reddit, Snapchat and safari heavily but all on wifi.', ">>{holic_2} : Based on your 20 hour stand by, you'd sure hate Android. Your battery is beyond good.", ">>{Eyad123} : yea i see what you mean, as advertised i think it was 14 hours of usage? i doubt that, but i came from a 6, and I'm more than impressed so far. this is the first plus i had so of course the plus has a bigger battery than a regular 6 or 7"], ['>>{BeowulfShaeffer} : Who **cares** what he says. We do not need a post here every time he flatulates out of his mouth orifice.', ">>{Chinesedoghandler} : He hasn't been relevant for so long. Where is he even talking from? In this story he had an interview. But every thumbnail has a picture of him at a lectern that was taken over a decade ago. What a hypocritical windbag he is.", ">>{wolflink009} : Ya, that's not going to happen. Maybe if he legalized pot or something I would respect him but he was all talk no action about change.", ">>{CommunismWillTriumph} : Obama is the embodiment of the status quo (that is, the U.S. being an oligarchy). He's branded as a progressive (and the majority of this subreddit buys into that fake image) but is anything but that. He had 8 years to push for progressive reform, but never even lifted a finger. All he did is bomb people and pass a corporate scam of a healthcare system.", ">>{LeMot-Juste} : Where has Obama been branded a Progressive, specifically? I'd love to see it.", '>>{LeMot-Juste} : Gingrich is in a desperate frenzy to stay relevant.', '>>{CommunismWillTriumph} : Are you kidding me? His whole 2008 campaign was basically a progressive circlejerk, hence the "change" slogan. Evidently though, "change" for Obama just meant "same as Bush minus the homophobia".', ">>{morbidexpression} : how naive to blame Obama for that as if the Congress and Senate didn't handcuff him. How old are you that you think a President can rule like a King? He pushed every step of the way but centrist dems and the GOP were a roadblock. He did manage to undo a lot of the Bush era damage and if you were a realist instead of monstrously ignorant, you'd appreciate that aspect of his tenure instead of pretending to be a parody of a leftist.", '>>{Kalel2319} : Who the fuck cares what this son of a bitch has to say? Why is he still at all relevant in a political climate that rejected "career politicians"?', ">>{LeMot-Juste} : No, I was asking where others had branded Obama as a Progressive, not what his campaign said...though I don't remember the word Progressive being used in either.", ">>{Kalel2319} : Bombing was bad. Lest we forget of course. Obama however was progressive in regulating financial markets (I didn't like this about him) and speaking out for a more fair social climate. (I loved this about him) We need to do away with all these purity tests.", '>>{staringinto_space} : > He had 8 years to push for progressive reform, but never even lifted a finger. this is a terrible shitty lie', '>>{Negative_Clank} : Hey remember when we had a country going the right direction but it was run by a n*****? Ya. "And how we are in bomb shelters and might die at any moment?" Ya. This is the shit, dog. Fuck that guy.', '>>{awesomeness0232} : Newt Gingrich is in desperate frenzy to create legacy.', '>>{objectivedesigning} : Thank you. Yes, this man is irrelevant.', '>>{aetius476} : Obama in a desperate frenzy to save *country*. It\'s spelled "country" Newt.', '>>{mindlessrabble} : Who cares what that child molesting, adulterous, open-marriage advocate, swindler thinks.'], ['>>{Quinnjester} : GOPer opposes early voting because it will boost black turnout', '>>{PurpleProsePoet} : > A Republican lawmaker in Georgia has sparked outrage by suggesting he opposes new Sunday voting hours because they’ll primarily benefit African-Americans—then explaining that he simply “would prefer more educated voters.” >“Michelle Obama comes to town and Chicago politics comes to DeKalb,” Millar wrote. “Per Jim Galloway of the [Atlanta Journal Constitution], this location is dominated by African American shoppers and it is near several large African American mega churches such as New Birth Missionary Baptist.” >He added: “Is it possible church buses will be used to transport people directly to the mall since the poll will open when the mall opens? If this happens, so much for the accepted principle of separation of church and state.”', '>>{dread_lobster} : I love it when Republicans fuck up and say something they honestly believe.', '>>{Thongpirate} : That\'s what the republicans would call "just antebellum talk"', ">>{IAMAconcernedparent} : Jesus Christ. I've never actually heard the arguments that Republicans give for opposing early voting. Well, here they are: > “Voting even one week early produces less-informed voters and dumbs down the electorate.” That was Christian Adams, a former Bush Justice Department lawyer. Similarly: > The Washington Post columnist George Will, a key shaper of conservative opinion, has called early voting “deplorable.” > “Instead of a community deliberation culminating in a shared day of decision, an election like the one here is diffuse and inferior,” Will wrote last year in reference to a Florida special election that allowed early voting. To call this laughable does an injustice to the concept of comedy. We have been debating this election for *almost 2 years* now. And they are seriously suggesting that allowing a week or even a single *day* of early voting would leave the electorate less informed? Do Republicans ever even listen to themselves?", '>>{Lorenzo_Canyon} : He said he couldn\'t possibly be racist because he\'d received an award from the NAACP. it\'s like the ultimate "I can\'t be racist. I have black friends."', ">>{dubslies} : No no, early voting is bad! Wikileaks could come out with a game-changer about Clinton any day now. We can't have people voting before that! ^/s", ">>{roboboogienights} : that's always been the reason, but now that we are in the Shackles Off era, they just come right out and say it. I guess that's a good thing in a way- at least we don't have to wonder who the racist creeps are.", '>>{roboboogienights} : > prefer more educated voters Does he mean more of the educated type who think climate change is a liberal conspiracy and reject the theory of evolution?', ">>{A40} : That's always been the case, and why the GOP has opposed it, and tries to restrict voting lists/require complex ID/eliminate people 'vouching' for voters, etc. *Any* improved voter access to the polls hurts the GOP.", '>>{Thongpirate} : or the classic: "I\'m not a racist but...."', ">>{IAMAconcernedparent} : At least that is an argument I can understand (even though it's easy to refute). But that isn't the argument that Will and others are making. Instead, they're saying that early voting doesn't allow enough time for *deliberation*. 2 years is just *barely* enough deliberation, even a single day less is dangerously little time! Actually, we shouldn't even allow a full day of voting. Everyone should vote at 11:59pm on Election Day to allow adequate time to deliberate.", ">>{Vesstair} : Separation of church and state = not establishing a state religion. Preferably it includes not governing based on religious ideals, but his side takes a dim view of that. It's about not forcing a religion on people. This isn't forcing a religion on people. It's forcing politics on them.", '>>{Lorenzo_Canyon} : That too. That may be more fitting than my analogy.', '>>{trump_yes} : I wonder how the GOP ended up with Trump.', '>>{Feignfame} : This is what conservatives rely on these days. Low turnout and voter suppression.', ">>{VacationAwayFromWork} : Guys, all he said is that he wants laws to keep black people from voting. And then he even went and clarified that he didn't mean to say black people, he meant the dumb people that live in black communities that go to black churches and black shopping centers. What in the world is wrong with an old white man wanting to structurally restrict the vote of ~~blacks~~ the uneducated. Look at his award. Ok thought so.", '>>{Quinnjester} : Its funny that Trump thinks he can depress dem turnout. When this shit happens we fight even more dumbass.', '>>{NashMcCabe} : Donald Sterling received an NAACP award too. We know how that guy turned out.', ">>{tartay745} : As long as the bus isn't preventing it's members from one party from loading then there isn't a problem. But since he's probably talking about a black church you know what he's suggesting.", '>>{Thongpirate} : Or they say [this...](https://youtu.be/uwyzHbCw7rA)', ">>{lurkeronebillion} : We get a rare few moments where they take the mask off and let everyone know that behind all the posturing it's really just plain bigotry and stupidity.", '>>{Jokrtothethief} : Or some maniac comes along and rips the mask off and the face comes along with it. A la Trump.', '>>{RxVote} : Then you might want to search U-Tube and listen to Michele Bachmann.', ">>{MrRtd} : Mask? In this case it's more like a white pointy hood.", ">>{dubslies} : To be fair, what Rick Hasan said in that article *(a respected election/CF lawyer)* seems to make sense and fits with shared concepts of each ideology. Liberals want to be more inclusive, to have more people voting, and conservatives want more informed people voting, and for conservatives, while I do think they *believe* this, I just think it's ironic given the stupidity and fact-free arguments their voter base is prone to - the birthers for instance, but that's another discussion. There is one reason that overshadows all others (imo) with this among Republicans lawmakers - It's power. They don't want more people voting because the people most likely to vote if it was made easier are usually heavily Democratic. It's been so blatantly obvious since 2011. The first black president gets elected, then reelected, with record minority turnout, and suddenly voter fraud is a problem and we must restrict voting? Really? Give me a break. It's so transparent, especially with study after study showing fraud to basically be a non-issue. The GOP knows almost every growing demographic is turning on them hard, and they are trying to cling to power by suppressing those growing voter blocs."], ['>>{saint_skank} : I bet it could also have next-gen software that corrupts within a year forcing you to buy their new shit', ">>{TurboChewy} : So, a 3d front facing camera? Sounds awfully gimmicky. If there's a reliable way to translate that information into better quality 2d photos, then power to them, but if it's a gimmicky feature like the half second long videos or facial recognition phone unlock, then why bother? It's been done.", '>>{NotAnotherNekopan} : And begins the floods of Apple speculations. My favourite... As many times as it\'s been mocked up in the past, I\'d really like to see them pull off an edge to edge screen on all sides. The tech exists to integrate the fingerprint reader into an LCD assembly, Sharp Crystal X (I think) has edge display on three sides, and if you really want to go for it, there\'s also free form displays from "insert_company_name_here". Advantages? None! Gimmick factor? Off the fucking charts. Possibility? Slim to none. In reality they\'re squeezing out an iPhone 7s. No need to be groundbreaking yet, just toss in a new feature or two and tout the advantages with baseless percentages that mean shit all to the average consumer.', '>>{NEDM64} : The tech exists to integrate the fingerprint reader into an LCD assembly Then why does nobody uses that said technology? "with baseless percentages" Explain this, name ONE time Apple gave anyone "baseless percentages".', '>>{Deetchy_} : Woo-wee. A standard iphone but with a "better" camera i almost never use because im not an instagram whore? Where do i sign?!', '>>{Ree81} : It\'s literally just a reaction towards Samsung\'s "iris" scanner (that\'s actually just an IR camera that looks at your face around the eyes). "Hmm, how can we do exactly the same thing practically but not literally?" Aaaand this is the answer.', '>>{Rogerss93} : Do you think Mercedes looked at Toyota\'s automatic folding door mirrors and said: "let\'s not bother, it\'s already been done"?', '>>{busa1} : What are those images? Apple for sure not going to put their back facing cameras below each other....', '>>{howardCK} : is the headline really saying the next generation of iPhones might have next generation features?', '>>{NotAnotherNekopan} : Because R&D time and costs. Phone manufacturers lag behind the latest in technology by at least a year or two because it takes time to integrate the hardware and software into existing frameworks. It must also be tested, and be purchased in high volumes, so a supply chain with the manufacturer must be established. Tim Cook *loves* his percentages. With the release of the recent MacBook Pro laptops, the presentation was decorated with "X% faster this" and "X% slimmer that". But, what does 18% slimmer *actually do* for the customer if it\'s at the expense of common, ubiquitous ports? Why make the iPhone slimmer if the battery still doesn\'t hold up to competitors? There\'s a point where consumers need to realize that percentage figures really just mean nothing to them, but serve only to help sell a new product for a higher price.', ">>{TurboChewy} : If it was something that was recieved badly and didn't work well, yeah. The 3DS did it, and nobody ever used it. Facial unlock is there on a lot of phones/laptops, and it's just a gimmick, nobody really uses it. It works but it's really insecure. I'm curious to see if Apple is going through with this, they're not ones to add unnecessary features, so I wonder how they'll justify this.", ">>{Rogerss93} : > and it's just a gimmick, nobody really uses it. Fingerprint scanners were just a gimmick until TouchID revolutionised the way we unlock mobile devices", ">>{TurboChewy} : Not at all. I've had a fingerprint scanner on my laptop and I used it every day for years before it came out on mobile devices. Nobody thought they were gimmicky, they were a useful tool on tons of devices. Tried and tested.", '>>{SilentPede} : I had an android since the Droid Incredible....always rooted and romed. Only bought phones that had an unlocked bootloader. Was quite the android snob. Got an iPhone 6S 6 months ago. No idea why I waited so long. Everything just *works*. And it is faster than any android I ever owned. Personal preference of course, but I went down the android path. I unashamedly admit the iphone is just better.', '>>{Rogerss93} : They were slow as fuck due to the fact they often depended on third party drivers. No phone manufacturer had any interest in prodding that technology with their expensive R&D sticks until Apple came along and integrated one of the most seamless fingerprint sensors any consumer device had ever seen. Apple could nail facial recognition on their first attempt like they did with TouchID, and create a new norm for flagship devices (I know Samsung have already attempted it). Alternatively it could end terribly and be the new Siri.', '>>{Deetchy_} : Just frustrated about the lack of creativity on these new "innovative" phones.', '>>{NEDM64} : > Because R&D time and costs. Phone manufacturers lag behind the latest in technology by at least a year or two because it takes time to integrate the hardware and software into existing frameworks. It must also be tested, and be purchased in high volumes, so a supply chain with the manufacturer must be established. No shit sherlock. > Tim Cook loves his percentages. With the release of the recent MacBook Pro laptops, the presentation was decorated with "X% faster this" and "X% slimmer that". And those numbers are based in real benchmarks, and X% slimmer means it\'s X% slimmer. > But, what does 18% slimmer actually do for the customer if it\'s at the expense of common, ubiquitous ports? Outdated you mean, USB-C is here for a long time now. It\'s not Apple\'s fault that competitors are selling outdated tech. > Why make the iPhone slimmer if the battery still doesn\'t hold up to competitors? http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph10685/83902.png Apple haters… > There\'s a point where consumers need to realize that percentage figures really just mean nothing to them, but serve only to help sell a new product for a higher price. Your opinion, and it\'s wrong.', '>>{kirashi3} : Ah Sony, still hard at work developing new cameras, I see.', ">>{TurboChewy} : It's possible. While Siri was definitely a bust, I can't blame Apple for trying. They jumped the gun, releasing it when it wasn't ready. Today, voice recognition is pretty damn accurate, if Siri had come out this gen, it'd have a much better reputation. I can't say the same level exists yet for image recognition. We'll see, but I hope it isn't central to the phones operation.", ">>{rommaster14} : The Motorola atrix would like to have a word with you about fingerprint scanners in phone technology. Apples works better but it came out two or three years later so it's expected.", '>>{Cheeseman1478} : Live Photos are cool, my friends and I all love looking at love photos from group pictures and seeing the change we make right after the picture.', ">>{TurboChewy} : To each his own, I guess. I'm sure there are good ways for them to be used, but some people literally just take every picture like that.", '>>{emmagreen9122} : Apple hasn’t even confirmed that whether it will apple iPhone 8 or iPhone X, as 2017 also marks the 10th anniversary of the iPhone. Off course, the phone will have the better camera than its predecessor but we will have to see whether they can beat the dual-lens feature or not.', '>>{osmdroid} : Its not about android, its about NEXUS/PIXEL , they are the best of android. Once you use nexus you never look back. I hate samsuck phones way more than i hate iPhones. Best of android, nexus 6p/5x & pixel x/xl', ">>{JoeKkerr} : Real world differs from benchmark applefan. I've had a 6s, believe me even with moderate to light use i struggled to get past 3PM with 20% battery. I even tried 6s plus, its battery life was amazing but as soon as i played games and a bit of camera work, it automatically became shit. Switched to S7 edge.", '>>{youshedo} : i am just waiting for the next iphone to have a built in selfie stick.', '>>{creeldeel} : I am really hoping for more dongles and incompatible charging cables', ">>{TheMagicMarkerMan} : Umm, that's a useful addition, these other things are gimmicks. Apple needs to get back to giving us things we didn't know we wanted and stop playing keeping up with the joneses.", '>>{Rogerss93} : What makes automatically folding mirrors any more useful than automatically unlocking your phone by looking at it?', '>>{fordman84} : Save that and give me a removable battery. Or Expandable memory.', ">>{ttile} : Personally I'd rather believe an unbiased third party tech review site (one that is the arguably one of the most respected out there) rather than some guy on the internet.", ">>{ttile} : If it doesn't reliably work can it really be considered a feature?", '>>{rommaster14} : Mine worked the whole two years I had the phone, even the great and powerful Apple has mis steps. They also consider the lack of something to be a feature...', ">>{ttile} : Even today fingerprint sensors aren't perfect. Also we know there were big advancements in the underlying tech that got us to the usability level as today. Couple that with reviews of the atrix talking about it's unreliable fingerprint sensor and it makes me take your comment with a heavy grain of salt.", '>>{rommaster14} : For sure man, I think the point is that the poster implied apple pioneered the technology and up until then nobody had made anything worth talking about. That is simply not true and why I replied, Apple makes an awesome device and their scanners are the best in the normal phone market these days.', '>>{choose868} : do we also need to sell kidney for this one also?', ">>{picardo85} : I'm waiting for the next iphone to have a god damn 3.5mm jack."]]

classify and reply

['>>{DonaldDucked} : Laura Ingraham Says Trump Racism Wouldn’t Be A Big Deal If GOP Leadership Would Just Shut Up About It!: She’s not wrong, just openly advocating for the suppression of legitimate critique to make the Republican party win.', ">>{progress18} : Al Franken Tells Jeff Sessions His Russian Contacts Explanation Is 'Ridiculous'", '>>{reasonableoption} : New GW Battleground Poll: Clinton Begins to Pull Away from Trump, and Voters Think She’ll Win', '>>{Not_A_Doctor__} : >“I think he owes it to this committee to come back and explain himself,” Franken said. >"He answered a question I didn\'t ask. And for him to put this in his letter as a response is insulting I\'ve bent over backward not to say that he lied. He needs to come back." Yeah, about the lying part, everyone has done the math by now...', ">>{jgh9} : Trump decries 'tremendous increase' in U.S. autism cases. But it's not so simple.", ">>{deadbeatdad80} : It's fucking DANGEROUS for one of the most powerful men in the world to believe this. This is unacceptable.", ">>{Shiari_The_Wanderer} : No complacency - Vote. Don't just assume she's going to win because of polls.", '>>{Inquisitive_Troll} : No complacency here, sent in my ballot today.', '>>{Shiari_The_Wanderer} : Nice. I just found out I probably have to travel the week of the 8th, so going to try to get my absentee tomorrow.', '>>{Lochmon} : Whatever the truth of these and all the other issues, this entire gang of white-collar hooligans should be thrown the hell out simply for being so oblivious to *appearance of impropriety.*', ">>{reasonableoption} : Note: this isn't a poll of just battleground states. It's a national poll. Clinton +8", ">>{DonaldDucked} : For those of you who weren't yet aware This is the person behind Lifezette. It's complete trash.", '>>{Bond__Vagabond} : Go Al. He is polite yet forceful in his message. He seems to be gearing toward a 2020 run and I like it.', ">>{Wiscony} : Ah yes, autism has increased bigly Trump, we hear you. However, the ability to diagnose it has also increased, well, bigly. Previously undiagnosed cases years ago can now be diagnosed and treated properly. But, these were his thoughts on Twitter just a few years back... Healthy young child goes to doctor, gets pumped with massive shot of many vaccines, doesn't feel good and changes - AUTISM. Many such cases! 7:35 AM · Mar 28, 2014 Well after the study linking vaccines to autism was debunked and the medical license revoked from the doctor that ran the study, yet, Trump continues on.", ">>{Politx} : So? It's Laura Ingraham she makes a living saying dumb shit.", '>>{AngerMacFadden} : You are not very good at this ya know.', ">>{lukistke} : Its like he keeps giving him the opportunity to come out and say it, but he just doesn't want to. He is picking a fight. He knows what you want him to say, but he isn't going to say it. He would rather fight it out and see who wins. And his side is arguing that the answer no to the question of if you meet with the Russians is not a lie. He has triple downed on that answer now? How can you effectively run a government if everyone's information is false? We need the truth and THE WHOLE TRUTH. Not part of the truth that could mean two different things.", ">>{Tcampd12} : So many other things going on that's why it didn't get coverage that it warrants. I heard him say it and watched the response of the people in the room. Most of them just smiling and nodding their heads. It was disgusting. Sarah Palin on steroids.", ">>{DonaldDucked} : Much of the universe's water is produced as a byproduct of star formation. The formation of stars is accompanied by a strong outward wind of gas and dust. When this outflow of material eventually impacts the surrounding gas, the shock waves that are created compress and heat the gas. The water observed is quickly produced in this warm dense gas.", '>>{the_schlonger} : Laura Ingrahm is pretty hot. 10/10 Would MILF in all holes.', '>>{tommy2014015} : Its like if Sarah Palin and 4chan had a son and America went oh shit, he should be president', ">>{dirtymothafracka} : I did not talk with any Russians during the campaign* Footnotes *except that meeting** with the Russian ambassador **and those other meetings with Russians Come on guys it's not that hard to have the huge amount of help you can hire as a congressman tell you that you met with some Russians and explain those meetings.", '>>{kiarra33} : That whole "Bill Clinton is a rapist" is probably losing him the election lol..', ">>{sinnerG} : The simple explanation for his rage and confusion is that Trump's youngest son has autism and he would rather blame evil scientists, who caused a horrible epidemic, than accept that a family member may have lost the genetic lottery.", ">>{DonaldDucked} : Why do you think I'm unbiased? I'm heavily biased against bigoted idiots like Laura Ingraham .", ">>{UnderlordZ} : 1. I would *love* for the explanation to *actually* be Evil Scientists, because at least then we would have a chance against the Trump Administration. Death rays, weather machines, Frankensteinian monstrosities, all that good shit! 2. Donny-boy only knows the definition of loss as pertaining to anyone who doesn't share his blood.", ">>{Smallmammal} : Franken is great, but he's almost a jr guy and on none of the 'important' committees. Where are the senior Democratic leadership on this? Schumer chimes in once in a while, but its like they're disinterested in fighting this. I suspect the dems are going to led this slide and will just let Franken be on 'attack dog' mode for the sake of appearances and to put a little pressure on Trump. Its incredible how this isn't the biggest scandal of our generation. Instead its just 'meh, the Attorney General lied about his connections to a hostile foreign power. No biggie. Oh and he wants to put pot users in jail like its 1954.' I wish the Dems could rile people up like the GOP can. Everyone is so goddamn complacent. This should be a bigger scandal.", '>>{PM_ME_2DISAGREEWITHU} : I would love to see Stewart Smalley 2020 "I\'m good, I\'m smart, and gosh darn it, I deserve it."', ">>{Donald_J_Putin} : IDK, not every time a Senator seeks attention is for a 2020 run. He is definitely VP material, but I don't see him running in the primaries.", '>>{helpfulkorn} : Trump wants to blame vaccines even though there is no link, rather than accept the fact that he was 60 when Barron was born and advanced paternal age has been linked to autism.', '>>{Liar_tuck} : Having kids when you are older can also be a factor in autism. Not saying Barron is autistic, just his parents ages make him a higher risk.', ">>{AJ_Smith} : I guess sarcasm really isn't that transparent..... At least your honest", '>>{progress18} : It seems like he might do that or is at least taking on a more prominent role. You might be interested in r/alfranken.', ">>{GAforTrump} : Wow you were really upset about my Lifezette submission. Is it wrong for this subreddit to get new viewpoints on things? Also, the title of the article implies that she agrees that Trump is racist, but he is not racist and she doesn't agree with that. But this vendetta against Ingraham is great.", ">>{PM_ME_2DISAGREEWITHU} : That's similar to what people were saying when he ran for the Senate", '>>{DonaldDucked} : Post some Coultier next. Pure win, guy.', '>>{space_goat} : [Trump bribes texas officials in Trump U case, they drop the case.](https://np.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/4n4osk/trump_donates_to_texas_officials_they_drop_probe/) Looks like Trump is the crooked one.', '>>{GonzoNation} : This has some more of the transcript from before she got to the "just throw under the bus" part. http://mediamatters.org/video/2016/06/15/laura-ingraham-asks-republicans-stop-calling-trump-racist-islamophobic-hateful-awful/210966', '>>{Cmoore4099} : We have a joke of a president now. Might as well have a comedian as president next.', '>>{AngerMacFadden} : One of the few things that Clinton does better than Trump is being corrupt.', '>>{fyhr100} : Glad he keeps pushing this issue. The GOP is trying to quietly pretend none of it happened.', ">>{GAforTrump} : Oh your spelling was different and I'm not used to someone referring to Ann Coulter by just her last name, I guess most people use first and last since Ann is so short.", ">>{InkyVoile} : Here's an idiot thought: Aside from Barron's permanent bored face, what if this is coming up to silence Melissa McCarthy, the cousin of that other ijit Jenny McCarthy? That seems like a plot worthy of that numbnut Bannon.", ">>{gaeuvyen} : it's just like during WWI when the invented the brodie helmet to stop soldiers from dying of head wounds, and then they so a sharp increase in head wounds. The cause of the increase in the number of head wounds was not from the helmets causing wounds or people feeling emboldened and taking more risks, no, it was because of the way they recorded casualties, any deaths were just labeled as that, dead. They didn't put where their wounds were that killed them, so when they issued the brodie helmet it was saving lives, so instead of being dead, you just had a head injury. Similar situation now, higher population, better diagnosis techniques, broader spectrum term, this all means the number of people diagnosed with autism is going to rise. It is an indication the medical field is getting better.", ">>{Donald_J_Putin} : I'm not saying he shouldn't run - I like Franken. I just don't think every time a senator makes a headline that they are posturing for a run for POTUS.", ">>{deeprogrammed} : Well after looking at the 'articles' that get upvoted here, she has a point. GOP leadership is terrified of being called a racist by the left so they immediately capitulate to their agenda.", '>>{Cmoore4099} : I know. I just thought that line was clever and figured use it or lose it.', ">>{shelbys_foot} : Sure those minority groups probably wouldn't even find out about Trump's racsim if everybody else didn't keep bringing it up. /s", ">>{N-athan} : The more I hear and learn about him the more I like, but if it becomes apparent this early he's a contender for 2020 they're going to drag his name through the mud for 3 years. He might be too toxic by then, even if he's actually squeaky clean.", ">>{The_Bartlet} : It's certainly not gaining him votes that's for sure.", ">>{kiarra33} : I know it was the stupidest thing to do it just makes his campaign look like a joke. Now it looks like it's run by info wars which is not going to gain any voters...", '>>{royboyblue} : Man, Al is the shit. What a legit government official.', ">>{scarydrew} : Common sense is telling Jeff Sessions his Russian contacts explanation is 'Ridiculous'", ">>{Ketzeph} : I know nothing about LIfezette, but it's hurting its own message if it thinks lumping people IN with trump will help the down ballot elections.", '>>{theendofanerror} : Fortunately the airstream medium will not let up on the horserace narrative and there will undoubtedly be a "Trump comeback" arc in the next week or so. That oughta keep people on edge.', '>>{robotjosh} : I voted against liar clinton but if al franken ran I would hear him out.', '>>{DeepPenetration} : Some guy posted a video of himself on Facebook screaming "Bill Clinton is a rapist" very loudly to Hillary and Al Gore. Trump supporters are very mature.', ">>{ChicagoJohn123} : That's actually my favorite argument for Franken. Whoever runs is going to be in a mudfight with a clown. We have access to a clown who happens to be a very competent progressive politician. Maybe he's the hero we need.", '>>{the_schlonger} : Conservative women are hot, and liberal women look like The Hilldebeast. Yikes!', ">>{kiarra33} : I know it would be extremely annoying and probably upsetting for Hillary but it doesn't gain Trump any voters... Why would anyone want to listen to Alex Jones is beyond comprehension watching him makes one go insane. Watch his segment on Bernie Sanders he's a complete weirdo...", ">>{MetroidMuscle} : My wife's a liberal, and she's a fuckin' babe. Try harder.", ">>{RooseBoltonGanjaMan} : You're worried about toxicity? After Diddlin grabembythepussy Donnie? Comrade Trump is about as toxic as you can get. Franken has maybe 1/100 of the amount of shit people can fling at him.", ">>{thatssoright} : And there aren't any other democrats that are standing up. Schumer is occasionally saying things here and there but he isn't being as vocal or obvious about it like Franken is. It's refreshing.", '>>{MASKMOVQ} : Let me recap what we know so far: 1. Sessions was asked whether he met Russian officials as a Trump surrogate and he said no. 2. There is no proof that Sessions met Russian officials as a Trump surrogate. 3. Hence there is no proof that Sessions perjured himself. If Franken claims that Sessions committed perjury, I can only conclude that he can either mind-read, or that he has extra evidence that he is unwilling to show us.', '>>{the_schlonger} : To you, maybe. I guess a 5/10 slag would probably seem hot to a 2/10 dude.', ">>{chisau} : How does Franken know it wasn't the CIA pretending to be Russians?", '>>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : > Amid those campaign milestones, the GW Battleground Poll found a clear majority of voters (62 percent) think Clinton will win, while less than a third (27 percent) believe Trump will take the presidency. HIGH ENERGY!', '>>{reasonably_plausible} : I agree, but large margins tend to make the losing side demoralized much more than it makes the winning side complacent.', ">>{blueholeload} : I think he'd make an interesting opponent for him. Since he's funny he could make people laugh at Trump and it'd be interesting to see how he handled it", '>>{MetroidMuscle} : Yep, that\'s conservatives on Reddit for ya. "Yeah, well... you\'re ugly! And your wife\'s ugly too!" Aren\'t you a little young to be using the internet this late?', '>>{N-athan} : So did Hillary. They made her work ethic a negative.', ">>{the_schlonger} : Typical leftist ageism. It would be sickening if it wasn't so predictable.", '>>{ThatDerpingGuy} : Look I need any sense of hope and that the Democratic Party is actually alive and willing to fight that I can get.', ">>{blueholeload} : Okay, here's my problem with that. I totally understand why you may not have wanted Clinton but, if you voted for Trump because you thought she was a liar that's silly. Not saying she hasn't and doesn't lie but, Trump hasn't stopped lying since the start of his campaign", ">>{robotjosh} : I didn't vote for either of the major party liars.", ">>{Donald_J_Putin} : I don't see that as the issue. I'd like to think that there are dem senators fighting trump, not for their own careers but to actually fight bad stuff. Blumenthal, Sanders, Murray, Wyden, Merkley, etc all have been speaking out. It's not because they are running for POTUS in 2020 necessarily.", '>>{MrFurious0} : This is the ONLY time ANYBODY will ever compare Sessions to Obi-Wan Kenobi, but it\'s like when Kenobi gives the "What I told you is true.... from a certain point of view" ...except in this case, Sessions is hoping to be talking to a normal person who will say "A CERTAIN POINT OF VIEW??!? IT WAS A FUCKING LIE, MOTHERFUCKER!!!", but instead, he\'s talking to Luke, who just wants an explanation. Franken is going full Skywalker on his ass, and it\'s just making sessions look even dumber. It\'s glorious.', '>>{toeguns} : [His reaction would be something like this.](http://giphy.com/gifs/election2016-donald-trump-election-2016-l0HlP690wjXwEk8jC)', '>>{DanSolo1} : You\'re twisting the facts. Sessions was never asked if he met Russian officials as a Trump surrogate. That information was offered up freely by Sessions. Franken: "...and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign what will you do?: Sessions: "Sen Franken, I am not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign, and I did not have communications with the Russians, and I am unable to comment on it."', '>>{blueholeload} : I really want to see a Franken Trump debate and see how long it\'d take Trump to dive further into his schoolyard tactics and call the senator "four eyes"', '>>{hypelightfly} : Let me fix your completely false recap. 1. Sessions was asked what he would do as AG if it came to light someone during Trumps campaign had met with Russian officials. Recuse himself, investigate, etc were expected answers. 1. Instead of answering the question, Sessions instead claimed "I didn\'t have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I\'m unable to comment on it." 1. There is evidence that Sessions perjured himself. Unfortunately due to the high bar required to prove perjury this is still unlikely to be enough to secure a conviction. However, it *should* be enough for the public to demand a resignation.', '>>{RyanSmith} : >Sessions was asked whether he met Russian officials as a Trump surrogate and he said no. No, he was asked what he would do if it turns out there was collaboration between Russia and the Trump campaign. Sessions didn\'t answer the question and instead told a lie under oath, aka perjury. That\'s why the "in context" doesn\'t hold up. Because the question he "answered" wasn\'t the one that was asked so there is no context. Just a dumb lie. Here\'s the verbatium text of the question: >"CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump\'s surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’ >"Now, again, I\'m telling you this as it\'s coming out, so you know. But if it\'s true, it\'s obviously extremely serious and **if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?**" Nowhere in there was your moved goalpost question asked.', '>>{MASKMOVQ} : ok sure change the first fact to 1. Sessions stated -- without being asked -- that he never met Russian officials as a Trump surrogate', '>>{TheKillersVanilla} : Hey liar! Good job on changing the facts so he sounds more innocent than he actually is. Good job liar.', ">>{MASKMOVQ} : First of all your suggestion that just because somebody doesn't answer the question his answer becomes totally separated from the context of question is intellectually dubious. In fact it is fairly ridiculous. I've never heard of this idea before so I assume you made up it just for the occasion. If not then kindly provide a precedent. Franken was asking about collusion with the Russians. Why on earth would Sessions change the subject entirely and start talking about his job as Senator and then perjure himself by denying that he had meetings with Russians as a Senator -- meetings that are official and ON RECORD. And secondly, even if we go with your methodology, there is still a context because Sessions sets it up himself -- by stating that he had been a surrogate once or twice, thereby framing the remainder of his sentence inside the campaign of Donald Trump. Of course Sessions met Russians as a Senator. That was common knowledge. So according to you Sessions decide to perjure himself on facts that are common knowledge. Don't forget that perjury requires intent to deceive. Why on earth would he do such a thing? I agree that Sessions should simply have answered the question. That's not perjury. His reply was inaccurate and waffling and poorly phrased. Still not perjury. Back to Franken: if Sessions didn't answer the question, why didn't Franken repeat the question and insist for an answer? Obviously he was not really interested in the answer. You have to admit that the question itself is a rather pointless one. It was a veiled accusation with the intention of ruffling Sessions. We can all agree that it worked really well. Thirdly, step back and take a look a the bigger picture. Do you honestly believe that Sessions would get into a room and blithely discuss committing TREASON with Russian diplomats who are monitored by the CIA and NSA 24/7? That's just the best. He would be in jail already for committing treason, never mind perjury."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{reasonableoption} : New GW Battleground Poll: Clinton Begins to Pull Away from Trump, and Voters Think She’ll Win', ">>{Shiari_The_Wanderer} : No complacency - Vote. Don't just assume she's going to win because of polls.", '>>{Inquisitive_Troll} : No complacency here, sent in my ballot today.', '>>{Shiari_The_Wanderer} : Nice. I just found out I probably have to travel the week of the 8th, so going to try to get my absentee tomorrow.', ">>{reasonableoption} : Note: this isn't a poll of just battleground states. It's a national poll. Clinton +8", '>>{kiarra33} : That whole "Bill Clinton is a rapist" is probably losing him the election lol..', ">>{The_Bartlet} : It's certainly not gaining him votes that's for sure.", ">>{kiarra33} : I know it was the stupidest thing to do it just makes his campaign look like a joke. Now it looks like it's run by info wars which is not going to gain any voters...", '>>{theendofanerror} : Fortunately the airstream medium will not let up on the horserace narrative and there will undoubtedly be a "Trump comeback" arc in the next week or so. That oughta keep people on edge.', '>>{DeepPenetration} : Some guy posted a video of himself on Facebook screaming "Bill Clinton is a rapist" very loudly to Hillary and Al Gore. Trump supporters are very mature.', ">>{kiarra33} : I know it would be extremely annoying and probably upsetting for Hillary but it doesn't gain Trump any voters... Why would anyone want to listen to Alex Jones is beyond comprehension watching him makes one go insane. Watch his segment on Bernie Sanders he's a complete weirdo...", '>>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : > Amid those campaign milestones, the GW Battleground Poll found a clear majority of voters (62 percent) think Clinton will win, while less than a third (27 percent) believe Trump will take the presidency. HIGH ENERGY!', '>>{reasonably_plausible} : I agree, but large margins tend to make the losing side demoralized much more than it makes the winning side complacent.'], [">>{jgh9} : Trump decries 'tremendous increase' in U.S. autism cases. But it's not so simple.", ">>{deadbeatdad80} : It's fucking DANGEROUS for one of the most powerful men in the world to believe this. This is unacceptable.", ">>{Wiscony} : Ah yes, autism has increased bigly Trump, we hear you. However, the ability to diagnose it has also increased, well, bigly. Previously undiagnosed cases years ago can now be diagnosed and treated properly. But, these were his thoughts on Twitter just a few years back... Healthy young child goes to doctor, gets pumped with massive shot of many vaccines, doesn't feel good and changes - AUTISM. Many such cases! 7:35 AM · Mar 28, 2014 Well after the study linking vaccines to autism was debunked and the medical license revoked from the doctor that ran the study, yet, Trump continues on.", ">>{Tcampd12} : So many other things going on that's why it didn't get coverage that it warrants. I heard him say it and watched the response of the people in the room. Most of them just smiling and nodding their heads. It was disgusting. Sarah Palin on steroids.", '>>{tommy2014015} : Its like if Sarah Palin and 4chan had a son and America went oh shit, he should be president', ">>{sinnerG} : The simple explanation for his rage and confusion is that Trump's youngest son has autism and he would rather blame evil scientists, who caused a horrible epidemic, than accept that a family member may have lost the genetic lottery.", ">>{UnderlordZ} : 1. I would *love* for the explanation to *actually* be Evil Scientists, because at least then we would have a chance against the Trump Administration. Death rays, weather machines, Frankensteinian monstrosities, all that good shit! 2. Donny-boy only knows the definition of loss as pertaining to anyone who doesn't share his blood.", '>>{helpfulkorn} : Trump wants to blame vaccines even though there is no link, rather than accept the fact that he was 60 when Barron was born and advanced paternal age has been linked to autism.', '>>{Liar_tuck} : Having kids when you are older can also be a factor in autism. Not saying Barron is autistic, just his parents ages make him a higher risk.', ">>{InkyVoile} : Here's an idiot thought: Aside from Barron's permanent bored face, what if this is coming up to silence Melissa McCarthy, the cousin of that other ijit Jenny McCarthy? That seems like a plot worthy of that numbnut Bannon.", ">>{gaeuvyen} : it's just like during WWI when the invented the brodie helmet to stop soldiers from dying of head wounds, and then they so a sharp increase in head wounds. The cause of the increase in the number of head wounds was not from the helmets causing wounds or people feeling emboldened and taking more risks, no, it was because of the way they recorded casualties, any deaths were just labeled as that, dead. They didn't put where their wounds were that killed them, so when they issued the brodie helmet it was saving lives, so instead of being dead, you just had a head injury. Similar situation now, higher population, better diagnosis techniques, broader spectrum term, this all means the number of people diagnosed with autism is going to rise. It is an indication the medical field is getting better."], [">>{progress18} : Al Franken Tells Jeff Sessions His Russian Contacts Explanation Is 'Ridiculous'", '>>{Not_A_Doctor__} : >“I think he owes it to this committee to come back and explain himself,” Franken said. >"He answered a question I didn\'t ask. And for him to put this in his letter as a response is insulting I\'ve bent over backward not to say that he lied. He needs to come back." Yeah, about the lying part, everyone has done the math by now...', '>>{Lochmon} : Whatever the truth of these and all the other issues, this entire gang of white-collar hooligans should be thrown the hell out simply for being so oblivious to *appearance of impropriety.*', '>>{Bond__Vagabond} : Go Al. He is polite yet forceful in his message. He seems to be gearing toward a 2020 run and I like it.', ">>{lukistke} : Its like he keeps giving him the opportunity to come out and say it, but he just doesn't want to. He is picking a fight. He knows what you want him to say, but he isn't going to say it. He would rather fight it out and see who wins. And his side is arguing that the answer no to the question of if you meet with the Russians is not a lie. He has triple downed on that answer now? How can you effectively run a government if everyone's information is false? We need the truth and THE WHOLE TRUTH. Not part of the truth that could mean two different things.", ">>{dirtymothafracka} : I did not talk with any Russians during the campaign* Footnotes *except that meeting** with the Russian ambassador **and those other meetings with Russians Come on guys it's not that hard to have the huge amount of help you can hire as a congressman tell you that you met with some Russians and explain those meetings.", ">>{Smallmammal} : Franken is great, but he's almost a jr guy and on none of the 'important' committees. Where are the senior Democratic leadership on this? Schumer chimes in once in a while, but its like they're disinterested in fighting this. I suspect the dems are going to led this slide and will just let Franken be on 'attack dog' mode for the sake of appearances and to put a little pressure on Trump. Its incredible how this isn't the biggest scandal of our generation. Instead its just 'meh, the Attorney General lied about his connections to a hostile foreign power. No biggie. Oh and he wants to put pot users in jail like its 1954.' I wish the Dems could rile people up like the GOP can. Everyone is so goddamn complacent. This should be a bigger scandal.", '>>{PM_ME_2DISAGREEWITHU} : I would love to see Stewart Smalley 2020 "I\'m good, I\'m smart, and gosh darn it, I deserve it."', ">>{Donald_J_Putin} : IDK, not every time a Senator seeks attention is for a 2020 run. He is definitely VP material, but I don't see him running in the primaries.", '>>{progress18} : It seems like he might do that or is at least taking on a more prominent role. You might be interested in r/alfranken.', ">>{PM_ME_2DISAGREEWITHU} : That's similar to what people were saying when he ran for the Senate", '>>{Cmoore4099} : We have a joke of a president now. Might as well have a comedian as president next.', '>>{fyhr100} : Glad he keeps pushing this issue. The GOP is trying to quietly pretend none of it happened.', ">>{Donald_J_Putin} : I'm not saying he shouldn't run - I like Franken. I just don't think every time a senator makes a headline that they are posturing for a run for POTUS.", '>>{Cmoore4099} : I know. I just thought that line was clever and figured use it or lose it.', ">>{N-athan} : The more I hear and learn about him the more I like, but if it becomes apparent this early he's a contender for 2020 they're going to drag his name through the mud for 3 years. He might be too toxic by then, even if he's actually squeaky clean.", '>>{royboyblue} : Man, Al is the shit. What a legit government official.', ">>{scarydrew} : Common sense is telling Jeff Sessions his Russian contacts explanation is 'Ridiculous'", '>>{robotjosh} : I voted against liar clinton but if al franken ran I would hear him out.', ">>{ChicagoJohn123} : That's actually my favorite argument for Franken. Whoever runs is going to be in a mudfight with a clown. We have access to a clown who happens to be a very competent progressive politician. Maybe he's the hero we need.", ">>{RooseBoltonGanjaMan} : You're worried about toxicity? After Diddlin grabembythepussy Donnie? Comrade Trump is about as toxic as you can get. Franken has maybe 1/100 of the amount of shit people can fling at him.", ">>{thatssoright} : And there aren't any other democrats that are standing up. Schumer is occasionally saying things here and there but he isn't being as vocal or obvious about it like Franken is. It's refreshing.", '>>{MASKMOVQ} : Let me recap what we know so far: 1. Sessions was asked whether he met Russian officials as a Trump surrogate and he said no. 2. There is no proof that Sessions met Russian officials as a Trump surrogate. 3. Hence there is no proof that Sessions perjured himself. If Franken claims that Sessions committed perjury, I can only conclude that he can either mind-read, or that he has extra evidence that he is unwilling to show us.', ">>{chisau} : How does Franken know it wasn't the CIA pretending to be Russians?", ">>{blueholeload} : I think he'd make an interesting opponent for him. Since he's funny he could make people laugh at Trump and it'd be interesting to see how he handled it", '>>{N-athan} : So did Hillary. They made her work ethic a negative.', '>>{ThatDerpingGuy} : Look I need any sense of hope and that the Democratic Party is actually alive and willing to fight that I can get.', ">>{blueholeload} : Okay, here's my problem with that. I totally understand why you may not have wanted Clinton but, if you voted for Trump because you thought she was a liar that's silly. Not saying she hasn't and doesn't lie but, Trump hasn't stopped lying since the start of his campaign", ">>{robotjosh} : I didn't vote for either of the major party liars.", ">>{Donald_J_Putin} : I don't see that as the issue. I'd like to think that there are dem senators fighting trump, not for their own careers but to actually fight bad stuff. Blumenthal, Sanders, Murray, Wyden, Merkley, etc all have been speaking out. It's not because they are running for POTUS in 2020 necessarily.", '>>{MrFurious0} : This is the ONLY time ANYBODY will ever compare Sessions to Obi-Wan Kenobi, but it\'s like when Kenobi gives the "What I told you is true.... from a certain point of view" ...except in this case, Sessions is hoping to be talking to a normal person who will say "A CERTAIN POINT OF VIEW??!? IT WAS A FUCKING LIE, MOTHERFUCKER!!!", but instead, he\'s talking to Luke, who just wants an explanation. Franken is going full Skywalker on his ass, and it\'s just making sessions look even dumber. It\'s glorious.', '>>{toeguns} : [His reaction would be something like this.](http://giphy.com/gifs/election2016-donald-trump-election-2016-l0HlP690wjXwEk8jC)', '>>{DanSolo1} : You\'re twisting the facts. Sessions was never asked if he met Russian officials as a Trump surrogate. That information was offered up freely by Sessions. Franken: "...and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign what will you do?: Sessions: "Sen Franken, I am not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign, and I did not have communications with the Russians, and I am unable to comment on it."', '>>{blueholeload} : I really want to see a Franken Trump debate and see how long it\'d take Trump to dive further into his schoolyard tactics and call the senator "four eyes"', '>>{hypelightfly} : Let me fix your completely false recap. 1. Sessions was asked what he would do as AG if it came to light someone during Trumps campaign had met with Russian officials. Recuse himself, investigate, etc were expected answers. 1. Instead of answering the question, Sessions instead claimed "I didn\'t have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I\'m unable to comment on it." 1. There is evidence that Sessions perjured himself. Unfortunately due to the high bar required to prove perjury this is still unlikely to be enough to secure a conviction. However, it *should* be enough for the public to demand a resignation.', '>>{RyanSmith} : >Sessions was asked whether he met Russian officials as a Trump surrogate and he said no. No, he was asked what he would do if it turns out there was collaboration between Russia and the Trump campaign. Sessions didn\'t answer the question and instead told a lie under oath, aka perjury. That\'s why the "in context" doesn\'t hold up. Because the question he "answered" wasn\'t the one that was asked so there is no context. Just a dumb lie. Here\'s the verbatium text of the question: >"CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump\'s surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’ >"Now, again, I\'m telling you this as it\'s coming out, so you know. But if it\'s true, it\'s obviously extremely serious and **if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?**" Nowhere in there was your moved goalpost question asked.', '>>{MASKMOVQ} : ok sure change the first fact to 1. Sessions stated -- without being asked -- that he never met Russian officials as a Trump surrogate', '>>{TheKillersVanilla} : Hey liar! Good job on changing the facts so he sounds more innocent than he actually is. Good job liar.', ">>{MASKMOVQ} : First of all your suggestion that just because somebody doesn't answer the question his answer becomes totally separated from the context of question is intellectually dubious. In fact it is fairly ridiculous. I've never heard of this idea before so I assume you made up it just for the occasion. If not then kindly provide a precedent. Franken was asking about collusion with the Russians. Why on earth would Sessions change the subject entirely and start talking about his job as Senator and then perjure himself by denying that he had meetings with Russians as a Senator -- meetings that are official and ON RECORD. And secondly, even if we go with your methodology, there is still a context because Sessions sets it up himself -- by stating that he had been a surrogate once or twice, thereby framing the remainder of his sentence inside the campaign of Donald Trump. Of course Sessions met Russians as a Senator. That was common knowledge. So according to you Sessions decide to perjure himself on facts that are common knowledge. Don't forget that perjury requires intent to deceive. Why on earth would he do such a thing? I agree that Sessions should simply have answered the question. That's not perjury. His reply was inaccurate and waffling and poorly phrased. Still not perjury. Back to Franken: if Sessions didn't answer the question, why didn't Franken repeat the question and insist for an answer? Obviously he was not really interested in the answer. You have to admit that the question itself is a rather pointless one. It was a veiled accusation with the intention of ruffling Sessions. We can all agree that it worked really well. Thirdly, step back and take a look a the bigger picture. Do you honestly believe that Sessions would get into a room and blithely discuss committing TREASON with Russian diplomats who are monitored by the CIA and NSA 24/7? That's just the best. He would be in jail already for committing treason, never mind perjury."], ['>>{DonaldDucked} : Laura Ingraham Says Trump Racism Wouldn’t Be A Big Deal If GOP Leadership Would Just Shut Up About It!: She’s not wrong, just openly advocating for the suppression of legitimate critique to make the Republican party win.', ">>{DonaldDucked} : For those of you who weren't yet aware This is the person behind Lifezette. It's complete trash.", ">>{Politx} : So? It's Laura Ingraham she makes a living saying dumb shit.", '>>{AngerMacFadden} : You are not very good at this ya know.', ">>{DonaldDucked} : Much of the universe's water is produced as a byproduct of star formation. The formation of stars is accompanied by a strong outward wind of gas and dust. When this outflow of material eventually impacts the surrounding gas, the shock waves that are created compress and heat the gas. The water observed is quickly produced in this warm dense gas.", '>>{the_schlonger} : Laura Ingrahm is pretty hot. 10/10 Would MILF in all holes.', ">>{DonaldDucked} : Why do you think I'm unbiased? I'm heavily biased against bigoted idiots like Laura Ingraham .", ">>{AJ_Smith} : I guess sarcasm really isn't that transparent..... At least your honest", ">>{GAforTrump} : Wow you were really upset about my Lifezette submission. Is it wrong for this subreddit to get new viewpoints on things? Also, the title of the article implies that she agrees that Trump is racist, but he is not racist and she doesn't agree with that. But this vendetta against Ingraham is great.", '>>{DonaldDucked} : Post some Coultier next. Pure win, guy.', '>>{space_goat} : [Trump bribes texas officials in Trump U case, they drop the case.](https://np.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/4n4osk/trump_donates_to_texas_officials_they_drop_probe/) Looks like Trump is the crooked one.', '>>{GonzoNation} : This has some more of the transcript from before she got to the "just throw under the bus" part. http://mediamatters.org/video/2016/06/15/laura-ingraham-asks-republicans-stop-calling-trump-racist-islamophobic-hateful-awful/210966', '>>{AngerMacFadden} : One of the few things that Clinton does better than Trump is being corrupt.', ">>{GAforTrump} : Oh your spelling was different and I'm not used to someone referring to Ann Coulter by just her last name, I guess most people use first and last since Ann is so short.", ">>{deeprogrammed} : Well after looking at the 'articles' that get upvoted here, she has a point. GOP leadership is terrified of being called a racist by the left so they immediately capitulate to their agenda.", ">>{shelbys_foot} : Sure those minority groups probably wouldn't even find out about Trump's racsim if everybody else didn't keep bringing it up. /s", ">>{Ketzeph} : I know nothing about LIfezette, but it's hurting its own message if it thinks lumping people IN with trump will help the down ballot elections.", '>>{the_schlonger} : Conservative women are hot, and liberal women look like The Hilldebeast. Yikes!', ">>{MetroidMuscle} : My wife's a liberal, and she's a fuckin' babe. Try harder.", '>>{the_schlonger} : To you, maybe. I guess a 5/10 slag would probably seem hot to a 2/10 dude.', '>>{MetroidMuscle} : Yep, that\'s conservatives on Reddit for ya. "Yeah, well... you\'re ugly! And your wife\'s ugly too!" Aren\'t you a little young to be using the internet this late?', ">>{the_schlonger} : Typical leftist ageism. It would be sickening if it wasn't so predictable."]]

classify and reply

['>>{pizzatra} : The Black Panthers are pretty much the reason why California has such strict gun laws now.', ">>{LondonPilot} : This might be the thing that gets me to use it in place of Alien Blue. In fact, I'm posting this from the app right now...", '>>{StonerMeditation} : **Release your TAXES TrumpleThinSkin**. (Alec Baldwin) **“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.”**—Adolf Hitler', ">>{GI_Malpractice_TA} : There's not a hell of a lot they can do that they haven't already been doing. Only now they probably won't have the Senate to help them, or the SCOTUS to have their backs judicially.", '>>{vph} : The only phony thing this has exposed is Donald Trump.', '>>{ByronLife} : Hello, what is multi-Reddit support? And how do you use it?', '>>{ComradeManafort} : Donald Trump’s ‘Softening’ on Immigration Is His Latest Flip-Flop', '>>{CaulkusAurelis} : When Ann Coulter is jumping ship, all the rats have already left...', ">>{itscalamani} : The article doesn't actually provide any proof over what he's flip flopped on..", '>>{Uday_Trump} : Just wait, he\'ll start insisting U1 is the "real unemployment rate" in a bit. Oh, and when another Democrat takes over? U6 magically becomes the real rate.', ">>{mafco} : > Looking past Election Day, Republicans sketch plan to stymie a President Hillary Clinton agenda. In other words, nothing different than what they've been doing for the last eight years. Aren't Republicans getting tired of obstructionism yet?", '>>{sunnieskye1} : The GOP? I remember them! They were a party of obstructionists who ran a racist hate-monger for President in 2016, right?', '>>{throwaway029384756} : Everything boils down to race with Progressives. Character, guys. Character.', ">>{LondonPilot} : You can set up multi-reddits from the website - it's a view that shows posts from several reddits at the same time. I've got one that combines iOS, iPhone, iPad and Apple, for example. Once they're set up, they seem to automatically come up within the app.", ">>{letdogsvote} : Well, once Trump took office, the good numbers became legit and accurate instead of Obama's lies.", '>>{End-Da-Fed} : The job numbers are "phony". They were fake then and they are fake now. Job numbers only count new jobs given to applicants. So if a chemical engineer looses his/her job and gets a less paying job as a chemical lab tech and moonlights as an Uber driver the Dept. of Labor counts the economy as creating one new job. It also doesn\'t count good jobs versus bad jobs. If the hotel and hospitality sector gains another 10,000 temporary jobs during vacation season the Dept. of Labor still says "Whoo hoo!! Jobs! Jobs! And more jobs!"', '>>{Crazy_Mastermind} : More proof that the Republican motto is "Party over Country."', ">>{TheCatsMoo} : [Philando Castile](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Philando_Castile) would agree. But of course, he was shot and killed by a police officer...so there's that.", '>>{mafco} : They might be surprised at the outcome if they tried cooperation, good government and leadership instead.', '>>{ComradeManafort} : >You are going to have a deportation force, and you are going to do it humanely,” he said during an appearance on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” >Now Trump has signaled that he’s adjusting his position. >“There certainly can be a softening, because we’re not looking to hurt people,” he said during a Fox News town hall event Tuesday, Aug. 23.', ">>{StonerMeditation} : Trump's own words: Crazy-Trump’s conspiracy theories - http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/58-donald-trump-conspiracy-theories-and-counting-definitive-trump-conspiracy-guide", ">>{LondonPilot} : Just had a look, and I can't see a way :(", ">>{kinghajj} : I'd up vote this if he'd defended his claim that the NRA doesn't support gun rights for blacks. Otherwise it's a good piece.", '>>{woodtick57} : so, according to Trump...he magically added tens and tens of millions of jobs to the US economy without anyone noticing at all!', '>>{walgman} : I quite like the look of the app as a whole but it lacks vital functionality to me such as this. I added some images to a comment easily this morning with AB.', '>>{satosaison} : And then four years later, they will complain about how little she has accomplished.', ">>{LondonPilot} : Agreed. I'm glad they added multis, and that's made it more usable for me, but after using it for a few hours, I still don't think it's as good as Alien Blue. Hopefully Alien Blue will carry on working for a bit longer. Without any support, who knows.....", ">>{itscalamani} : Exactly. these two quotes don't oppose each other or show he's flip flopping.", ">>{dyzo-blue} : > They broke the law, but it's not a felony, it's an act of love — ~~Jeb Bush~~ Donald Trump", '>>{sircool099} : I love when modern liberals decry the NRA as racist, but then say gun-control laws are racist too here. and they forget the NRA once stood with civil rights activists in a fire-fight with the KKK with no casualties on either side, scaring the KKK off.', '>>{CarmineFields} : Gun control when only done in black, Chicago neighborhoods based purely on looks IS racist.', ">>{falconisxx} : so when he says he can soften his position you don't think he is softening his position?", ">>{bestjare} : You can do this already. Post image to imgur and then take the link and embed in text. It's the same for all links Example: The format is the text in square brackets followed by the link in round brackets Googles website is [here](www.google.ca)", ">>{NotFooledbyFools} : Just wait. Once there is a bad jobs report he'll call it phony.", '>>{satosaison} : I think if the senate had its shit together, they could really highlight what a shitshow the republican congress is. With both houses blocking bills, it is easy to spin it as Obama accomplishing nothing, but if the president and the senate send bills like Zika funding to the house, and the house blocks them for crazy anti-abortion reasons, it is going to be easy to beat up on them 2 years later', '>>{DC25NYC} : remember the time a bunch of white guys started a militia and took over federal land and they all survived?', ">>{mdemo23} : Nothing but the biggest flop in a series of flops by weak, pathetic, Floppy Don. He flip flops on tax returns, flip flops on Hillary Clinton, flip flops on the Muslim ban, flip flops on corporate donations, flip flops on prosecuting women for abortion, flip flops on arming night club goers, flip flops on the minimum wage, flip flops on the KKK, and now he's flip flopping on the biggest pillar of his campaign. What's next? Flip flopping on trade agreements? Floppy, floppy Don. Sad!", '>>{berniebrah} : Reporting what trump says from say to day, meanwhile your people blather on about the same old hillary conspiracies', ">>{berniebrah} : >floppy don That's what the kiddos call him at NAMBLA meetups!", '>>{accountabilitycounts} : Okay, so any hope that the GOP has learned anything from the past eight years or the last eight months is officially dead. More of the same from the republics party.', '>>{ronnieww3} : Do you mean the conspiracy theories like Hillary Clinton paying people to say good things about her and bad things about Trump? Because yes I do.', '>>{chenghuayang} : Yeah! Finally the killing feature to drive me keeping using official app.', ">>{CarmineFields} : Trump said it. He said it was going to be directed at black neighborhoods in Chicago only. He's the one that made it racial.", '>>{woodtick57} : they actually give factual data on such seasonal jobs....', ">>{End-Da-Fed} : I haven't seen any of that. If you could link it I'd be happy to take a look at it.", ">>{box-art} : No, he's referring to being able to upload directly from the app without leaving it. [Like this.](http://i.imgur.com/8bV6csu.jpg)", '>>{LukeforBernie} : Which their base will believe 100%. So mission accomplished', '>>{dfaraci} : Guys... we\'ve spent 8 years refusing to work with the president, how has that turned out? "His approval ratings are at near record levels and everyone hates us. We\'re on course to lose the Senate. We ended up with Trump as our candidate" "OK. We stick to the plan!"', ">>{lolpoliticsthrowaway} : I don't understand this at all. It's as if everyone who gets elected into office has to remove their brain from their skull before starting. The approval rating for congress is abysmal. If I saw a poll saying people would rather live next to a rapist than a congressman, I wouldn't be surprised. The GOP is hurting bad and hemorrhaging voters left and right. So what do they decide to do? Change tactics and regain lost ground? Nope. The same shit that makes everyone hate them as much as they do. What's the plan here? Wait out another four years with terrible approval so you can lose the presidency AGAIN because you refuse to expand your tent while your base ages out and the Democrats pick up even more ground?", ">>{bearrosaurus} : It's really silly to try to predict the outlook 4 years from now. Between ourrevolution and the tea party, it's hard enough to figure out the midterms.", ">>{amishbr07} : Been using the official app lately and honestly I've been liking it. Just needs a few more features added and some tweaking and it would be perfect for me.", ">>{LukeforBernie} : You bring up a good point. Some estimations of the GOP losing the Senate this election cycle so it'll be interesting to see how that turns out", ">>{berniebrah} : It depends on what the definition of 'is' is", ">>{AssCalloway} : I don't think this shit is going to work with Hillary. She'll twist arms better than Obama ever did", ">>{ronnieww3} : Yeah how dare they show Trump's quote in juxtaposition to all of the blatant fear-mongering they do and claim he's flip-flopping.", ">>{ComradeManafort} : You realize Trump's entire advertising budget goes to online advertising and paid twitter bots, right? Please keeping pumping that insane conspiracy theory that and article about a $1 million pac called CTR means that it controls /r/politics.", '>>{throwaway029384756} : .....and they looted all the local stores, injured police officers, attacked people not having the same skin color and destroyed businesses? Yea I remember. Totally the same.', '>>{mafco} : She has zero leverage with politicians whose voters believe that cooperating with the other party is akin to selling out to the enemy. And the GOP establishment is just as uncomfortable with the idea of a woman president as it was with an African-American one.', '>>{ronnieww3} : Nice projection. Do they teach you that at CTR? This is the exact same argument as NO U.', '>>{aubska} : Out of curiosity, what other features is it missing?', ">>{amishbr07} : No way to set Top comment sorting as default, not a huge fan of sharing (have to go to the host site to share just the pic or gif otherwise it shares the reddit post), collapse bar very small which makes one line comments a pain to vote on because I keep collapsing it. Having said that these do not make the app unusable by any means. Just some minor things they gotta work on. Edit: I must've been living under a rock and just noticed they added default comment sorting.", '>>{Jedeyeboba} : They just added default comment sorting in the latest update. I do agree that we should be able to share, or at least save, images directly from the app.', ">>{ComradeManafort} : Do they teach you to respond to everything with 'CTR' in the Russian Intelligence internet troll army? Does pumping insane conspiracy theories about campaigns rigging voting on subreddits work for paid Russian Intelligence internet trolls? What does you leader Putin hope to accomplish by propping up Trump?", ">>{ronnieww3} : And I'm not the one who brought up r/politics being run by CTR. That's you own admission.", '>>{QuidStuprum} : This makes me happy. The lack of multi-reddit support has always irritated me.', '>>{juggernautjake} : Have they added the feature that alien blue has where it greys out posts you have already read?', '>>{BREXIT-THEN-TRUMP} : In the Washington Post editorial room everything is racist.', ">>{OpnotIc} : I think it's more likely the department will loose all funding and be dismantled when the jobs numbers start showing the inevitable impacts of trickle down economic policy. 'Report good numbers or be fake news' -is this administration's model.", ">>{WrathfulClarity} : well, that shouldn't be the case and we should do something about it", ">>{Egorse} : Although the Press focuses on the U3, the BlS gives information on a variety of different metrics, it isn't just the number of new jobs. For instance at the end of the latest [Jobs report summery](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm) they have links to over 25 different tables with information on many different aspects of employment.", ">>{ronnieww3} : Literally a one week old account with nothing but Trump bashing. Enjoy your check for subverting democracy, I hope it's worth it.", ">>{GI_Malpractice_TA} : I think finger-pointing from the incipient Trump fallout is going to do most of that damage anyways. We're probably going to see a lot of House primaries backed by the RNC in 2018.", '>>{End-Da-Fed} : Yes there are tables but none of them count jobs based on quality. It only uses market indicators to estimate how many jobs are created or lost. For example 600 new fast food jobs at minimum wage and only 50 high quality computer engineering jobs paying $120k could be created in a year, but the Dept. of Labor will only report 650 new jobs created.', '>>{ComradeManafort} : My own admission that you are pushing an insane conspiracy theory? Maybe you are having trouble understanding English, no surprise since your first language is probably Russian.', '>>{ronnieww3} : Thank you for correcting the record. (your check for .02 cents is being deposited into your account.)', '>>{ComradeManafort} : Yes this is obviously a low effort post only account not an alt. You can tell by the low effort messages I post. Has it snowed yet in Moscow?', ">>{CarmineFields} : That's what Trump wants. He wants stop-and-frisk in black Chicago neighborhoods only.", ">>{Risley} : That's what makes me question news reports when a cop shoots and kills a guy and they report he had a gun. I'm thinking so what? Perhaps tell me he didn't have a permit for it, bc if he *just had a gun* then thats the same as those 2nd amendment whack jobs that love to go around with rifles on their shoulders in public. If anything, it makes me feel as if its to spin the narrative *already*. Gotta back up the men in blue *regardless* if shooting the guy was warranted or not. Double Standard", '>>{Risley} : Well, one of them did get killed, but he was pulling out a pistol from his pocket. He wanted to die a martyr.', ">>{LondonPilot} : I know. That's exactly what I've been doing for ages. I really want to move to the official app now that Alien Blue isn't supported any more, but while it lacks features that Alien Blue has, I can't. Now, the official app is one big step closer, for me at least, to being usable.", '>>{ronnieww3} : Why, are you looking for a better pay? I bet Clinton gives you shit money.', ">>{political_expert777} : Such horse shit, there are plenty of black guns owners. It's just the ones you see getting lit up on the news all the time have the habit of trying to point their illegally obtained guns at officers and trying to rob liquor stores.", '>>{JasonBerk} : Yeah, liberals are so stupid for understanding the motives of conservatives better than conservatives themselves. Lol.', ">>{aubska} : You can save images from in the app. Tap on the picture to make it full screen and you'll see the Share icon in the bottom right corner. https://imgur.com/a/saOl7 I'm not sure if this was a feature in the previous version, though.", '>>{ComradeManafort} : What does Russian intelligence pay you? I hate on Trump for free internet points. Maybe I should switch to earn some quick rubles like you.', '>>{LOCUTUS_OF__BORG} : All the more reason to vote straight ticket democrat this year. Donnie\'s a fucking mess and these assholes plan on doing the same bullshit they\'ve been doing for the past 8 years. Thanks, but I prefer legislators who do their job, not those who will obstruct anything just because the "other side" agrees with it.', ">>{Jedeyeboba} : You're right. Mostly what I had been looking for was tapping and holding to save a photo like you can in Safari, but that works now too. I don't know if they switched to the SafariViewController or not, but it's a welcome addition. EDIT: Spelling", '>>{nonades} : I wish I could get paid Senate money to not do a job I was elected to do. Then again, I have moral, ethics, and convictions against wasting tax payer money.', ">>{Risley} : I dont recall Asians or Mexicans having the same history in America as blacks have. Context matters. And the majority of any race will tell you that rioting is not a warranted after police violence. However, you can be against rioters and still *understand why they are angry*. That is, if you have any empathy at all, and aren't just some cold hearted bigot.", '>>{DC25NYC} : any other race behind white and they would all be dead.', ">>{mlhradio} : Man, do I yearn to return back to the days of Tip O'Neill.", ">>{BREXIT-THEN-TRUMP} : Because there are bad shoots, just like all of the countless bad shoots that happened to white people. However, the media doesn't cover those because it doesn't generate clicks.", ">>{phillymjs} : The way to prevent this is to thoroughly demoralize Republican voters ahead of election day while bolstering the Democratic GotV efforts. If enough Republicans stay home and pout because it's a foregone conclusion Trump will get his ass kicked on November 8th, maybe the Dems will flip enough seats in the House to take control. It's not super likely to succeed, but it's still worth trying.", '>>{mlhradio} : Sam Wang at PEC currently gives it roughly an [85% chance of Democrats retaking the Senate](http://election.princeton.edu/todays-senate-seat-count-histogram/). And it has been slowly trending in the blue direction for the past several weeks.', '>>{Trumpicana} : You realize handguns are illegal to carry in Chicago with out a permit and doesnt allow for open carry... So if you see a gun you should be taking it away as its not concealed. You people really need to educate yourself on laws of the city and why stop and frisk works when the item is illegal to have outside your home in said city.', '>>{aubska} : Yeah, that would be a nice feature. It does suck a bit having to tap so many times just to save a picture.', '>>{Qwertyujh} : The best part is that the app can show imgur content even if the imgur site is blocked on my internet', '>>{TrumpOrTrump} : Do you have a source for this claim or are you just making things up? I do recall him stating stop-and-frisk is a policy that would work in Chicago but I do no remember him making any comment about black communities only.', '>>{growyurown} : Hillary will woo them with more wars. Something she is always on board with.', '>>{BeardyDave} : When I was in the Army, it wasn\'t uncommon for guys to bring weapons captured on other objectives out on missions just in case there was a bad shoot. I don\'t think I ever witnessed anybody use them, but everyone knew what to do if they needed them - "Guy had an AK." I\'m sure no police department in the United States has ever practiced anything like this. But for some reason every time a random guy gets killed by cops and happens to have a gun that he never used, reminds me of my past experiences. /s', ">>{Glblwrmingisfak} : Probably because there was more than one of them. Notice that cops don't generally go charging into gang hide outs. They just go into the homes of families and toss flash bangs onto babies.", '>>{ItsMeAids} : That\'s all I want. To be able to add subreddits I like to check in on without subscribing. Alien blue just called this "casual subreddits"', ">>{political_expert777} : I don't know, there isn't video of the incident. Even then that's like one incident out of all the times police stop people daily.", ">>{Glblwrmingisfak} : Probably because there are enough counter examples that the statement can't be entirely true. I remember they defended publicly the women who accidentally crossed a bridge into Jersey while conceal carrying. I think even before it blew it up in MSM.", ">>{CarmineFields} : You don't need to see a gun. You just need to see a suspicious-looking person in black neighborhoods in Chicago according to Trump's grand vision.", '>>{DC25NYC} : And how might that be. Imagine headline "Middle eastern Americans miltia takes over federal land" "Black militia takes over federal land"', '>>{Trumpicana} : Trumps exact words were "if you see a gun."', ">>{CarmineFields} : After you've stopped and searched them because they look suspicious. Thats kind of an important detail.", '>>{Trumpicana} : no thats not what he said. "If you see a gun Stop them, Frisk them, and take the gun away".', '>>{MightyMeegosh} : The feds shot and killed one of those guys. So were you thinking of a different incident?', ">>{Decon-III} : Drop guns. Definitely a thing and definitely a thing we'll never know the full impact of.", '>>{general_nuisance} : stop-and-frisk sucks, but it is an effective policy. http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/07/17/does-stop-and-frisk-reduce-crime/to-see-its-value-see-how-crime-rose-elsewhere', ">>{Decon-III} : Which were backed by the NRA. The fucking National Rifle Association; the gun humpers that get their rocks off imagining violent revolution didn't like a black militia.", '>>{Trumpicana} : Yea I watched the rally where he actually said and fleshed it out. 140 characters really dont do well with fleshing out an idea.', '>>{CarmineFields} : Read the words. It says "possibly with a gun" or law enforcement suspects they might have a gun. No one needs to see anything.', '>>{Hillarys_shart} : Why was his gun sitting on his lap in the video that his girlfriend posted? That is not how you carry a gun.', '>>{Amida0616} : As a gun rights supporter i agree. Blacks are by percentage denied gun rights more than white people because they live in liberal cities with unconstitutional gun control.', ">>{TheCatsMoo} : Why does that matter? He was licensed to carry that gun. Do you want to take any someone's 2nd Amendment right to carry a legal licenced gun?", '>>{Eric_the_Barbarian} : And people wonder why some of us gun rights supporters refuse to join their little club.', '>>{whoopiethereitis} : Getting pulled over and exiting the vehicle with the gun while approaching a police officer is just a little different than: "Oh they\'re oppressed of their constitutional rights" Having a gun is a right. Acting like a retard with one is a privilege that can be taken away. But don\'t let me interrupt the double standard routine.', '>>{MostlyCarbonite} : > unconstitutional gun control lol "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED! MORON LABLE!1!"', '>>{BeardyDave} : >"...definitely a thing we\'ll never know the full impact of." Almost like that\'s part of their purpose. EDIT: I\' not trying to make fun of you. Just underscoring the systemic issue.', '>>{GrahamNorthman} : LA Riots = Oregon militia in a national park without casualty. Checks out.', '>>{throwaway029384756} : And he had a book in his hand saying "don\'t shoot".', ">>{rpgmarvin} : Good thing the police release the video, or we don't need them too, Cops always tell the truth.", ">>{Risley} : There is a helicopter video of it, go look for yourself if you don't trust the report. If they wanted to kill these guys, they wouldn't have waited like a month. They treated these people with kid gloves.", ">>{JoePesciOfGoneFishin} : I mean, you're joking and I know you're joking, but there were people (on Reddit and ESPECIALLY on Voat) who tried to argue that he did nothing wrong and police assassinated him. Even after they had seen the video.", '>>{savemejebus0} : You all are so disgusting. You blatantly misrepresent that and compare it to something completely different just to push a narrative. The problems that do exist will never get solved because of dishonest morons like you making ignorant cases that real racists will rightly point to as moronic. Stop helping.', ">>{whoopiethereitis} : > Good thing the police release the video, or we don't need them too, Cops always tell the truth. Not sure how to read that.... Obviously there's a video and the family lawyer claims it's unclear if he was holding the gun in his hand. Notice how no one claimed he didn't own a gun and yet there's a bunch of people speculating whether or not police placed a gun on him. Let's not jump to any conclusio.... and there's riots. Edit: [This appears to be the most historically accurate account](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VewkpLpTLl8)...", ">>{Risley} : Where does it show he did that? Am I supposed to just trust cops at every turn? Was [this cop](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKQqgVlk0NQ) fearing for his life too? Where was the black guy's gun?", '>>{aaronhayes26} : And Ronald Reagan! He signed the bill without a second thought.', ">>{Risley} : lmao come on man, I've seen people ride with their guns, loaded in the fucking glove compartment. News flash, they were white people. You think they would be shot as well? Give me a break.", ">>{whoopiethereitis} : > Where does it show he did that? How was the gun found next to his body if he didn't exit with it? Are you on some crusade or can you focus on the topic at hand?", '>>{vegetarianrobots} : [And in America gun control has historically been in place to keep African Americans and Immigrants from owning firearms.](https://www.firearmsandliberty.com/cramer.racism.html) [This even extends into modern day.](http://www.mtv.com/news/2900230/the-really-really-racist-history-of-gun-control-in-america/)', '>>{DC25NYC} : How is that not an example of how gun rights are different for white people.', ">>{jcw4455} : This is the moment gun owners have feared. A government official has come forth with a plan that would lead to the confiscation of firearms without due process. This is the slippery slope that will lead to an all out ban. They've been protecting themselves for decades and preparing for this moment. I'm sure that all gun owners will be outraged by this. ...", ">>{Risley} : First off, I'm speaking in general when I say a news report mentions a gun was found near the dead guy. And considering the videos out there with cops being caught on camera making up charges to cover their asses, can you blame society when they stop trusting cops? As for this guy, I don't know if he had a gun or not. I saw a picture where it might have been a gun, but again they don't have body camera footage to back anything up on the encounter. Don't be upset when the community no longer trusts cops at their word when enough videos are shown where the cop shoots someone under questionable circumstances. Hell, the black community probably hasn't trust the cops for decades. This is just now getting more traction bc people other than the black community are seeing for the first time the shit they have to deal with. So yeah, cops can and will do more. Just because you won't hold them accountable doesn't mean we won't. And that starts with demanding more oversight.", ">>{rpgmarvin} : Cool, lets shoot anyone if it's unclear if they are holding a weapon or not. Even if he did had a gun is it illegal for a black man to carry a gun in Charlotte? People are angry, They will jump to conclusions if police refuse to provide accountability & transparency.", ">>{whoopiethereitis} : You don't even make sense. I'm talking about the thousands of others that have the common sense to keep,their hands on the steering wheel and listen to an officer. If you don't agree with the officer, then settle it in court. Feel unjustly arrested? Sue. What you don't do is start screaming, running around, moving/taking out/pointing weapons or even make sudden movements when an officer is giving you an order and PARTICULARLY when they have a weapon out. > lmao come on man, I've seen people ride with their guns, loaded in the fucking glove compartment. Yeah as in.. the fucking glove compartment and not while approaching an officer as was the case in NC. > Give me a break. Sounds like you need one.", '>>{Risley} : What is immediately comply? Within 1 second or 5 seconds? My point is there are videos where guys are shot before they have a chance *to* comply. And there is a world of difference between someone having a gun in their hand or pointed at the cop, versus having a gun "visible". I can have a gun "visible" if I have a license to do so. How about cops be damn specific on what they want me to do, and have killing me not the first response.', ">>{whoopiethereitis} : You are 100% correct. Can't have my weapon loaded anywhere in my vehicle.", '>>{whoopiethereitis} : > What is immediately comply? Within 1 second or 5 seconds? My point is there are videos where guys are shot before they have a chance to comply. > How about cops be damn specific on what they want me to do, and have killing me not the first response. How about Michael Brown charging and wounding the officer. But everyone really pushed the "hands up don\'t shoot"', '>>{ranak12} : 1. State X has no meaningful gun control laws. 2. You want said laws but keeps getting blocked. 3. Move in armed Black Panthers. 4. Strict gun control laws the next day.', ">>{whoopiethereitis} : > Cool, lets shoot anyone if it's unclear if they are holding a weapon or not. You're trying to mischaracterize my words. The family attorney... as in the guy getting paid to represent the guys family... is saying it isn't clear. It was clear to the cop who shot him. > Even if he did had a gun is it illegal for a black man to carry a gun in Charlotte? See my first comment. Also, why the racist undertones like the guy got shot because he was a legal gun owning black man that racist white cops wanted to lynch. Wasn't the officer in question black also?", ">>{rpgmarvin} : Sorry i forgot racist couldn't hate their own race. > It was clear to the cop who shot him. If he said so, Than it must be true.", ">>{whoopiethereitis} : > Sorry i forgot racist couldn't hate their own race. What? So you're implying the black police officer is racist? > If he said so, Than it must be true. Were you there? No? Neither was I. Its what you do at this stage... consider firsthand accounts. Meanwhile there is obviously some video and an investigation.", ">>{rpgmarvin} : I 'm implying that he could be, Not that he is. He could also just be abusing his power. I don't think either of us was there. Just asking to see the video, rather than just believe what a cop said or what witnesses saw.", ">>{Risley} : Oh that's right, that one guy actually deserved it that time. Guess that means they always do.", ">>{whoopiethereitis} : > I 'm implying that he could be, Not that he is. He could also just be abusing his power. > I don't think either of us was there. Just asking to see the video, rather than just believe what a cop said or what witnesses saw. Good to see you're trying to wait for evidence before passing judgement: > This is about a **police officer** killing a minority, It doesn't matter if the cop was a minority. People can be racist against their own race too. Oh wait. Edit: [here's the video of the daughter berating the police](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VewkpLpTLl8), calling all of the white people crackers, and saying all the white men rape their daughters and the women fuck horses. Yeah, the cops are the racists...", '>>{UncleMeat} : If "bad shoots" just happen, maybe we should reconsider how much power we give the police. This sort of thing doesn\'t tend to happen in Europe.', '>>{rpgmarvin} : Go call your parents, Ask them to read the comments to you.', '>>{wtfIhateTrumpnow} : They were. He was actually holding a paint brush.', ">>{arguablytrue} : And that governor? Ronald Reagan. Why the downvote? It's true.", '>>{wtfIhateTrumpnow} : I remember a black militia given space to burn things down in Ferguson. the headline should have said "black militia takes over city."', ">>{Risley} : Bla bla bla you're still wrong. Even if you can't see it, we do, and there's more of us than you.", '>>{buchanan_smith} : do we have to pay for the Washington Post website to view it or am i doing something wrong', '>>{Amida0616} : Well Chicago and DC tried an outright gun ban. You dont think that is constitutionally problematic?', ">>{Fatfaggottreat1} : That's odd, I'm brown and can buy a gun whenever I want. It helps that I'm not a fucking hood rat with a criminal record.", '>>{auspicious123456} : Not really, as there are a lot of documented cases where the gun was "visible". You\'re just taking one example and spreading it to all instances.', ">>{linkprovidor} : If you read the article you'd see your comment has absolutely nothing to do with the discussion at hand. Not once is buying guns mentioned in the article. Read it, you might learn something.", ">>{Fatfaggottreat1} : I read it, it's just a bunch of bullshit. It's an opinion peace with no facts or figures to back up the bullshit opinions.", ">>{BrainPenetrator} : Not really. Just like Obama says, it's far easier to get a gun than a book. Guns are for everyone!", ">>{IHateSelfishPeople} : > I'm brown That doesn't surprise me, since you are a piece of shit.", ">>{fitzroy95} : The NRA of the 60s (Civil Rights era) and the NRA of the current era are completely different political animals. The NRA used to encourage safety, training, sensible gun control, until 1977 when their complete board of directors was purged and replaced by 2A fanatics. Its called the ['Cincinnati Revolt](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-nras-true-believers-converted-a-marksmanship-group-into-a-mighty-gun-lobby/2013/01/12/51c62288-59b9-11e2-88d0-c4cf65c3ad15_story.html), and is the sole reason for the NRA being the gun lobby's marketing wing nowdays.", '>>{fitzroy95} : Because nowdays they are absolute stark raving nuts, back in the 60s they were much more sensible, adaptable, and willing to negotiate to find solutions to issues', '>>{Fatfaggottreat1} : Nope, just not a blm rioter and race baiter.', '>>{whoopiethereitis} : Welcome to the conversation; not sure that\'s the argument you want to lead with though. Having a gun "visible" in front of a cop that is questioning/arresting/pulling you over is the wrong time to start getting combative.', ">>{whoopiethereitis} : [I thought you might find this interesting, but probably won't change your mind.](http://www.wcnc.com/mb/news/local/new-revelations-in-keith-scott-case_/326706427)"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{LondonPilot} : This might be the thing that gets me to use it in place of Alien Blue. In fact, I'm posting this from the app right now...", '>>{ByronLife} : Hello, what is multi-Reddit support? And how do you use it?', ">>{LondonPilot} : You can set up multi-reddits from the website - it's a view that shows posts from several reddits at the same time. I've got one that combines iOS, iPhone, iPad and Apple, for example. Once they're set up, they seem to automatically come up within the app.", ">>{LondonPilot} : Just had a look, and I can't see a way :(", '>>{walgman} : I quite like the look of the app as a whole but it lacks vital functionality to me such as this. I added some images to a comment easily this morning with AB.', ">>{LondonPilot} : Agreed. I'm glad they added multis, and that's made it more usable for me, but after using it for a few hours, I still don't think it's as good as Alien Blue. Hopefully Alien Blue will carry on working for a bit longer. Without any support, who knows.....", ">>{bestjare} : You can do this already. Post image to imgur and then take the link and embed in text. It's the same for all links Example: The format is the text in square brackets followed by the link in round brackets Googles website is [here](www.google.ca)", '>>{chenghuayang} : Yeah! Finally the killing feature to drive me keeping using official app.', ">>{box-art} : No, he's referring to being able to upload directly from the app without leaving it. [Like this.](http://i.imgur.com/8bV6csu.jpg)", ">>{amishbr07} : Been using the official app lately and honestly I've been liking it. Just needs a few more features added and some tweaking and it would be perfect for me.", '>>{aubska} : Out of curiosity, what other features is it missing?', ">>{amishbr07} : No way to set Top comment sorting as default, not a huge fan of sharing (have to go to the host site to share just the pic or gif otherwise it shares the reddit post), collapse bar very small which makes one line comments a pain to vote on because I keep collapsing it. Having said that these do not make the app unusable by any means. Just some minor things they gotta work on. Edit: I must've been living under a rock and just noticed they added default comment sorting.", '>>{Jedeyeboba} : They just added default comment sorting in the latest update. I do agree that we should be able to share, or at least save, images directly from the app.', '>>{QuidStuprum} : This makes me happy. The lack of multi-reddit support has always irritated me.', '>>{juggernautjake} : Have they added the feature that alien blue has where it greys out posts you have already read?', ">>{LondonPilot} : I know. That's exactly what I've been doing for ages. I really want to move to the official app now that Alien Blue isn't supported any more, but while it lacks features that Alien Blue has, I can't. Now, the official app is one big step closer, for me at least, to being usable.", ">>{aubska} : You can save images from in the app. Tap on the picture to make it full screen and you'll see the Share icon in the bottom right corner. https://imgur.com/a/saOl7 I'm not sure if this was a feature in the previous version, though.", ">>{Jedeyeboba} : You're right. Mostly what I had been looking for was tapping and holding to save a photo like you can in Safari, but that works now too. I don't know if they switched to the SafariViewController or not, but it's a welcome addition. EDIT: Spelling", '>>{aubska} : Yeah, that would be a nice feature. It does suck a bit having to tap so many times just to save a picture.', '>>{Qwertyujh} : The best part is that the app can show imgur content even if the imgur site is blocked on my internet', '>>{ItsMeAids} : That\'s all I want. To be able to add subreddits I like to check in on without subscribing. Alien blue just called this "casual subreddits"'], ['>>{ComradeManafort} : Donald Trump’s ‘Softening’ on Immigration Is His Latest Flip-Flop', '>>{CaulkusAurelis} : When Ann Coulter is jumping ship, all the rats have already left...', ">>{itscalamani} : The article doesn't actually provide any proof over what he's flip flopped on..", '>>{ComradeManafort} : >You are going to have a deportation force, and you are going to do it humanely,” he said during an appearance on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” >Now Trump has signaled that he’s adjusting his position. >“There certainly can be a softening, because we’re not looking to hurt people,” he said during a Fox News town hall event Tuesday, Aug. 23.', ">>{itscalamani} : Exactly. these two quotes don't oppose each other or show he's flip flopping.", ">>{dyzo-blue} : > They broke the law, but it's not a felony, it's an act of love — ~~Jeb Bush~~ Donald Trump", ">>{falconisxx} : so when he says he can soften his position you don't think he is softening his position?", ">>{mdemo23} : Nothing but the biggest flop in a series of flops by weak, pathetic, Floppy Don. He flip flops on tax returns, flip flops on Hillary Clinton, flip flops on the Muslim ban, flip flops on corporate donations, flip flops on prosecuting women for abortion, flip flops on arming night club goers, flip flops on the minimum wage, flip flops on the KKK, and now he's flip flopping on the biggest pillar of his campaign. What's next? Flip flopping on trade agreements? Floppy, floppy Don. Sad!", '>>{berniebrah} : Reporting what trump says from say to day, meanwhile your people blather on about the same old hillary conspiracies', ">>{berniebrah} : >floppy don That's what the kiddos call him at NAMBLA meetups!", '>>{ronnieww3} : Do you mean the conspiracy theories like Hillary Clinton paying people to say good things about her and bad things about Trump? Because yes I do.', ">>{berniebrah} : It depends on what the definition of 'is' is", ">>{ronnieww3} : Yeah how dare they show Trump's quote in juxtaposition to all of the blatant fear-mongering they do and claim he's flip-flopping.", ">>{ComradeManafort} : You realize Trump's entire advertising budget goes to online advertising and paid twitter bots, right? Please keeping pumping that insane conspiracy theory that and article about a $1 million pac called CTR means that it controls /r/politics.", '>>{ronnieww3} : Nice projection. Do they teach you that at CTR? This is the exact same argument as NO U.', ">>{ComradeManafort} : Do they teach you to respond to everything with 'CTR' in the Russian Intelligence internet troll army? Does pumping insane conspiracy theories about campaigns rigging voting on subreddits work for paid Russian Intelligence internet trolls? What does you leader Putin hope to accomplish by propping up Trump?", ">>{ronnieww3} : And I'm not the one who brought up r/politics being run by CTR. That's you own admission.", ">>{ronnieww3} : Literally a one week old account with nothing but Trump bashing. Enjoy your check for subverting democracy, I hope it's worth it.", '>>{ComradeManafort} : My own admission that you are pushing an insane conspiracy theory? Maybe you are having trouble understanding English, no surprise since your first language is probably Russian.', '>>{ronnieww3} : Thank you for correcting the record. (your check for .02 cents is being deposited into your account.)', '>>{ComradeManafort} : Yes this is obviously a low effort post only account not an alt. You can tell by the low effort messages I post. Has it snowed yet in Moscow?', '>>{ronnieww3} : Why, are you looking for a better pay? I bet Clinton gives you shit money.', '>>{ComradeManafort} : What does Russian intelligence pay you? I hate on Trump for free internet points. Maybe I should switch to earn some quick rubles like you.'], ['>>{StonerMeditation} : **Release your TAXES TrumpleThinSkin**. (Alec Baldwin) **“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.”**—Adolf Hitler', '>>{vph} : The only phony thing this has exposed is Donald Trump.', '>>{Uday_Trump} : Just wait, he\'ll start insisting U1 is the "real unemployment rate" in a bit. Oh, and when another Democrat takes over? U6 magically becomes the real rate.', ">>{letdogsvote} : Well, once Trump took office, the good numbers became legit and accurate instead of Obama's lies.", '>>{End-Da-Fed} : The job numbers are "phony". They were fake then and they are fake now. Job numbers only count new jobs given to applicants. So if a chemical engineer looses his/her job and gets a less paying job as a chemical lab tech and moonlights as an Uber driver the Dept. of Labor counts the economy as creating one new job. It also doesn\'t count good jobs versus bad jobs. If the hotel and hospitality sector gains another 10,000 temporary jobs during vacation season the Dept. of Labor still says "Whoo hoo!! Jobs! Jobs! And more jobs!"', ">>{StonerMeditation} : Trump's own words: Crazy-Trump’s conspiracy theories - http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/58-donald-trump-conspiracy-theories-and-counting-definitive-trump-conspiracy-guide", '>>{woodtick57} : so, according to Trump...he magically added tens and tens of millions of jobs to the US economy without anyone noticing at all!', ">>{NotFooledbyFools} : Just wait. Once there is a bad jobs report he'll call it phony.", '>>{woodtick57} : they actually give factual data on such seasonal jobs....', ">>{End-Da-Fed} : I haven't seen any of that. If you could link it I'd be happy to take a look at it.", ">>{OpnotIc} : I think it's more likely the department will loose all funding and be dismantled when the jobs numbers start showing the inevitable impacts of trickle down economic policy. 'Report good numbers or be fake news' -is this administration's model.", ">>{Egorse} : Although the Press focuses on the U3, the BlS gives information on a variety of different metrics, it isn't just the number of new jobs. For instance at the end of the latest [Jobs report summery](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm) they have links to over 25 different tables with information on many different aspects of employment.", '>>{End-Da-Fed} : Yes there are tables but none of them count jobs based on quality. It only uses market indicators to estimate how many jobs are created or lost. For example 600 new fast food jobs at minimum wage and only 50 high quality computer engineering jobs paying $120k could be created in a year, but the Dept. of Labor will only report 650 new jobs created.'], [">>{GI_Malpractice_TA} : There's not a hell of a lot they can do that they haven't already been doing. Only now they probably won't have the Senate to help them, or the SCOTUS to have their backs judicially.", ">>{mafco} : > Looking past Election Day, Republicans sketch plan to stymie a President Hillary Clinton agenda. In other words, nothing different than what they've been doing for the last eight years. Aren't Republicans getting tired of obstructionism yet?", '>>{sunnieskye1} : The GOP? I remember them! They were a party of obstructionists who ran a racist hate-monger for President in 2016, right?', '>>{Crazy_Mastermind} : More proof that the Republican motto is "Party over Country."', '>>{mafco} : They might be surprised at the outcome if they tried cooperation, good government and leadership instead.', '>>{satosaison} : And then four years later, they will complain about how little she has accomplished.', '>>{satosaison} : I think if the senate had its shit together, they could really highlight what a shitshow the republican congress is. With both houses blocking bills, it is easy to spin it as Obama accomplishing nothing, but if the president and the senate send bills like Zika funding to the house, and the house blocks them for crazy anti-abortion reasons, it is going to be easy to beat up on them 2 years later', '>>{accountabilitycounts} : Okay, so any hope that the GOP has learned anything from the past eight years or the last eight months is officially dead. More of the same from the republics party.', '>>{LukeforBernie} : Which their base will believe 100%. So mission accomplished', '>>{dfaraci} : Guys... we\'ve spent 8 years refusing to work with the president, how has that turned out? "His approval ratings are at near record levels and everyone hates us. We\'re on course to lose the Senate. We ended up with Trump as our candidate" "OK. We stick to the plan!"', ">>{lolpoliticsthrowaway} : I don't understand this at all. It's as if everyone who gets elected into office has to remove their brain from their skull before starting. The approval rating for congress is abysmal. If I saw a poll saying people would rather live next to a rapist than a congressman, I wouldn't be surprised. The GOP is hurting bad and hemorrhaging voters left and right. So what do they decide to do? Change tactics and regain lost ground? Nope. The same shit that makes everyone hate them as much as they do. What's the plan here? Wait out another four years with terrible approval so you can lose the presidency AGAIN because you refuse to expand your tent while your base ages out and the Democrats pick up even more ground?", ">>{bearrosaurus} : It's really silly to try to predict the outlook 4 years from now. Between ourrevolution and the tea party, it's hard enough to figure out the midterms.", ">>{LukeforBernie} : You bring up a good point. Some estimations of the GOP losing the Senate this election cycle so it'll be interesting to see how that turns out", ">>{AssCalloway} : I don't think this shit is going to work with Hillary. She'll twist arms better than Obama ever did", '>>{mafco} : She has zero leverage with politicians whose voters believe that cooperating with the other party is akin to selling out to the enemy. And the GOP establishment is just as uncomfortable with the idea of a woman president as it was with an African-American one.', ">>{GI_Malpractice_TA} : I think finger-pointing from the incipient Trump fallout is going to do most of that damage anyways. We're probably going to see a lot of House primaries backed by the RNC in 2018.", '>>{LOCUTUS_OF__BORG} : All the more reason to vote straight ticket democrat this year. Donnie\'s a fucking mess and these assholes plan on doing the same bullshit they\'ve been doing for the past 8 years. Thanks, but I prefer legislators who do their job, not those who will obstruct anything just because the "other side" agrees with it.', '>>{nonades} : I wish I could get paid Senate money to not do a job I was elected to do. Then again, I have moral, ethics, and convictions against wasting tax payer money.', ">>{mlhradio} : Man, do I yearn to return back to the days of Tip O'Neill.", ">>{phillymjs} : The way to prevent this is to thoroughly demoralize Republican voters ahead of election day while bolstering the Democratic GotV efforts. If enough Republicans stay home and pout because it's a foregone conclusion Trump will get his ass kicked on November 8th, maybe the Dems will flip enough seats in the House to take control. It's not super likely to succeed, but it's still worth trying.", '>>{mlhradio} : Sam Wang at PEC currently gives it roughly an [85% chance of Democrats retaking the Senate](http://election.princeton.edu/todays-senate-seat-count-histogram/). And it has been slowly trending in the blue direction for the past several weeks.', '>>{growyurown} : Hillary will woo them with more wars. Something she is always on board with.'], ['>>{pizzatra} : The Black Panthers are pretty much the reason why California has such strict gun laws now.', '>>{throwaway029384756} : Everything boils down to race with Progressives. Character, guys. Character.', ">>{TheCatsMoo} : [Philando Castile](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Philando_Castile) would agree. But of course, he was shot and killed by a police officer...so there's that.", ">>{kinghajj} : I'd up vote this if he'd defended his claim that the NRA doesn't support gun rights for blacks. Otherwise it's a good piece.", '>>{sircool099} : I love when modern liberals decry the NRA as racist, but then say gun-control laws are racist too here. and they forget the NRA once stood with civil rights activists in a fire-fight with the KKK with no casualties on either side, scaring the KKK off.', '>>{CarmineFields} : Gun control when only done in black, Chicago neighborhoods based purely on looks IS racist.', '>>{DC25NYC} : remember the time a bunch of white guys started a militia and took over federal land and they all survived?', ">>{CarmineFields} : Trump said it. He said it was going to be directed at black neighborhoods in Chicago only. He's the one that made it racial.", '>>{throwaway029384756} : .....and they looted all the local stores, injured police officers, attacked people not having the same skin color and destroyed businesses? Yea I remember. Totally the same.', '>>{BREXIT-THEN-TRUMP} : In the Washington Post editorial room everything is racist.', ">>{WrathfulClarity} : well, that shouldn't be the case and we should do something about it", ">>{CarmineFields} : That's what Trump wants. He wants stop-and-frisk in black Chicago neighborhoods only.", ">>{Risley} : That's what makes me question news reports when a cop shoots and kills a guy and they report he had a gun. I'm thinking so what? Perhaps tell me he didn't have a permit for it, bc if he *just had a gun* then thats the same as those 2nd amendment whack jobs that love to go around with rifles on their shoulders in public. If anything, it makes me feel as if its to spin the narrative *already*. Gotta back up the men in blue *regardless* if shooting the guy was warranted or not. Double Standard", '>>{Risley} : Well, one of them did get killed, but he was pulling out a pistol from his pocket. He wanted to die a martyr.', ">>{political_expert777} : Such horse shit, there are plenty of black guns owners. It's just the ones you see getting lit up on the news all the time have the habit of trying to point their illegally obtained guns at officers and trying to rob liquor stores.", '>>{JasonBerk} : Yeah, liberals are so stupid for understanding the motives of conservatives better than conservatives themselves. Lol.', ">>{Risley} : I dont recall Asians or Mexicans having the same history in America as blacks have. Context matters. And the majority of any race will tell you that rioting is not a warranted after police violence. However, you can be against rioters and still *understand why they are angry*. That is, if you have any empathy at all, and aren't just some cold hearted bigot.", '>>{DC25NYC} : any other race behind white and they would all be dead.', ">>{BREXIT-THEN-TRUMP} : Because there are bad shoots, just like all of the countless bad shoots that happened to white people. However, the media doesn't cover those because it doesn't generate clicks.", '>>{Trumpicana} : You realize handguns are illegal to carry in Chicago with out a permit and doesnt allow for open carry... So if you see a gun you should be taking it away as its not concealed. You people really need to educate yourself on laws of the city and why stop and frisk works when the item is illegal to have outside your home in said city.', '>>{TrumpOrTrump} : Do you have a source for this claim or are you just making things up? I do recall him stating stop-and-frisk is a policy that would work in Chicago but I do no remember him making any comment about black communities only.', '>>{BeardyDave} : When I was in the Army, it wasn\'t uncommon for guys to bring weapons captured on other objectives out on missions just in case there was a bad shoot. I don\'t think I ever witnessed anybody use them, but everyone knew what to do if they needed them - "Guy had an AK." I\'m sure no police department in the United States has ever practiced anything like this. But for some reason every time a random guy gets killed by cops and happens to have a gun that he never used, reminds me of my past experiences. /s', ">>{Glblwrmingisfak} : Probably because there was more than one of them. Notice that cops don't generally go charging into gang hide outs. They just go into the homes of families and toss flash bangs onto babies.", ">>{political_expert777} : I don't know, there isn't video of the incident. Even then that's like one incident out of all the times police stop people daily.", ">>{Glblwrmingisfak} : Probably because there are enough counter examples that the statement can't be entirely true. I remember they defended publicly the women who accidentally crossed a bridge into Jersey while conceal carrying. I think even before it blew it up in MSM.", ">>{CarmineFields} : You don't need to see a gun. You just need to see a suspicious-looking person in black neighborhoods in Chicago according to Trump's grand vision.", '>>{DC25NYC} : And how might that be. Imagine headline "Middle eastern Americans miltia takes over federal land" "Black militia takes over federal land"', '>>{Trumpicana} : Trumps exact words were "if you see a gun."', ">>{CarmineFields} : After you've stopped and searched them because they look suspicious. Thats kind of an important detail.", '>>{Trumpicana} : no thats not what he said. "If you see a gun Stop them, Frisk them, and take the gun away".', '>>{MightyMeegosh} : The feds shot and killed one of those guys. So were you thinking of a different incident?', ">>{Decon-III} : Drop guns. Definitely a thing and definitely a thing we'll never know the full impact of.", '>>{general_nuisance} : stop-and-frisk sucks, but it is an effective policy. http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/07/17/does-stop-and-frisk-reduce-crime/to-see-its-value-see-how-crime-rose-elsewhere', ">>{Decon-III} : Which were backed by the NRA. The fucking National Rifle Association; the gun humpers that get their rocks off imagining violent revolution didn't like a black militia.", '>>{Trumpicana} : Yea I watched the rally where he actually said and fleshed it out. 140 characters really dont do well with fleshing out an idea.', '>>{CarmineFields} : Read the words. It says "possibly with a gun" or law enforcement suspects they might have a gun. No one needs to see anything.', '>>{Hillarys_shart} : Why was his gun sitting on his lap in the video that his girlfriend posted? That is not how you carry a gun.', '>>{Amida0616} : As a gun rights supporter i agree. Blacks are by percentage denied gun rights more than white people because they live in liberal cities with unconstitutional gun control.', ">>{TheCatsMoo} : Why does that matter? He was licensed to carry that gun. Do you want to take any someone's 2nd Amendment right to carry a legal licenced gun?", '>>{Eric_the_Barbarian} : And people wonder why some of us gun rights supporters refuse to join their little club.', '>>{whoopiethereitis} : Getting pulled over and exiting the vehicle with the gun while approaching a police officer is just a little different than: "Oh they\'re oppressed of their constitutional rights" Having a gun is a right. Acting like a retard with one is a privilege that can be taken away. But don\'t let me interrupt the double standard routine.', '>>{MostlyCarbonite} : > unconstitutional gun control lol "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED! MORON LABLE!1!"', '>>{BeardyDave} : >"...definitely a thing we\'ll never know the full impact of." Almost like that\'s part of their purpose. EDIT: I\' not trying to make fun of you. Just underscoring the systemic issue.', '>>{GrahamNorthman} : LA Riots = Oregon militia in a national park without casualty. Checks out.', '>>{throwaway029384756} : And he had a book in his hand saying "don\'t shoot".', ">>{rpgmarvin} : Good thing the police release the video, or we don't need them too, Cops always tell the truth.", ">>{Risley} : There is a helicopter video of it, go look for yourself if you don't trust the report. If they wanted to kill these guys, they wouldn't have waited like a month. They treated these people with kid gloves.", ">>{JoePesciOfGoneFishin} : I mean, you're joking and I know you're joking, but there were people (on Reddit and ESPECIALLY on Voat) who tried to argue that he did nothing wrong and police assassinated him. Even after they had seen the video.", '>>{savemejebus0} : You all are so disgusting. You blatantly misrepresent that and compare it to something completely different just to push a narrative. The problems that do exist will never get solved because of dishonest morons like you making ignorant cases that real racists will rightly point to as moronic. Stop helping.', ">>{whoopiethereitis} : > Good thing the police release the video, or we don't need them too, Cops always tell the truth. Not sure how to read that.... Obviously there's a video and the family lawyer claims it's unclear if he was holding the gun in his hand. Notice how no one claimed he didn't own a gun and yet there's a bunch of people speculating whether or not police placed a gun on him. Let's not jump to any conclusio.... and there's riots. Edit: [This appears to be the most historically accurate account](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VewkpLpTLl8)...", ">>{Risley} : Where does it show he did that? Am I supposed to just trust cops at every turn? Was [this cop](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKQqgVlk0NQ) fearing for his life too? Where was the black guy's gun?", '>>{aaronhayes26} : And Ronald Reagan! He signed the bill without a second thought.', ">>{Risley} : lmao come on man, I've seen people ride with their guns, loaded in the fucking glove compartment. News flash, they were white people. You think they would be shot as well? Give me a break.", ">>{whoopiethereitis} : > Where does it show he did that? How was the gun found next to his body if he didn't exit with it? Are you on some crusade or can you focus on the topic at hand?", '>>{vegetarianrobots} : [And in America gun control has historically been in place to keep African Americans and Immigrants from owning firearms.](https://www.firearmsandliberty.com/cramer.racism.html) [This even extends into modern day.](http://www.mtv.com/news/2900230/the-really-really-racist-history-of-gun-control-in-america/)', '>>{DC25NYC} : How is that not an example of how gun rights are different for white people.', ">>{jcw4455} : This is the moment gun owners have feared. A government official has come forth with a plan that would lead to the confiscation of firearms without due process. This is the slippery slope that will lead to an all out ban. They've been protecting themselves for decades and preparing for this moment. I'm sure that all gun owners will be outraged by this. ...", ">>{Risley} : First off, I'm speaking in general when I say a news report mentions a gun was found near the dead guy. And considering the videos out there with cops being caught on camera making up charges to cover their asses, can you blame society when they stop trusting cops? As for this guy, I don't know if he had a gun or not. I saw a picture where it might have been a gun, but again they don't have body camera footage to back anything up on the encounter. Don't be upset when the community no longer trusts cops at their word when enough videos are shown where the cop shoots someone under questionable circumstances. Hell, the black community probably hasn't trust the cops for decades. This is just now getting more traction bc people other than the black community are seeing for the first time the shit they have to deal with. So yeah, cops can and will do more. Just because you won't hold them accountable doesn't mean we won't. And that starts with demanding more oversight.", ">>{rpgmarvin} : Cool, lets shoot anyone if it's unclear if they are holding a weapon or not. Even if he did had a gun is it illegal for a black man to carry a gun in Charlotte? People are angry, They will jump to conclusions if police refuse to provide accountability & transparency.", ">>{whoopiethereitis} : You don't even make sense. I'm talking about the thousands of others that have the common sense to keep,their hands on the steering wheel and listen to an officer. If you don't agree with the officer, then settle it in court. Feel unjustly arrested? Sue. What you don't do is start screaming, running around, moving/taking out/pointing weapons or even make sudden movements when an officer is giving you an order and PARTICULARLY when they have a weapon out. > lmao come on man, I've seen people ride with their guns, loaded in the fucking glove compartment. Yeah as in.. the fucking glove compartment and not while approaching an officer as was the case in NC. > Give me a break. Sounds like you need one.", '>>{Risley} : What is immediately comply? Within 1 second or 5 seconds? My point is there are videos where guys are shot before they have a chance *to* comply. And there is a world of difference between someone having a gun in their hand or pointed at the cop, versus having a gun "visible". I can have a gun "visible" if I have a license to do so. How about cops be damn specific on what they want me to do, and have killing me not the first response.', ">>{whoopiethereitis} : You are 100% correct. Can't have my weapon loaded anywhere in my vehicle.", '>>{whoopiethereitis} : > What is immediately comply? Within 1 second or 5 seconds? My point is there are videos where guys are shot before they have a chance to comply. > How about cops be damn specific on what they want me to do, and have killing me not the first response. How about Michael Brown charging and wounding the officer. But everyone really pushed the "hands up don\'t shoot"', '>>{ranak12} : 1. State X has no meaningful gun control laws. 2. You want said laws but keeps getting blocked. 3. Move in armed Black Panthers. 4. Strict gun control laws the next day.', ">>{whoopiethereitis} : > Cool, lets shoot anyone if it's unclear if they are holding a weapon or not. You're trying to mischaracterize my words. The family attorney... as in the guy getting paid to represent the guys family... is saying it isn't clear. It was clear to the cop who shot him. > Even if he did had a gun is it illegal for a black man to carry a gun in Charlotte? See my first comment. Also, why the racist undertones like the guy got shot because he was a legal gun owning black man that racist white cops wanted to lynch. Wasn't the officer in question black also?", ">>{rpgmarvin} : Sorry i forgot racist couldn't hate their own race. > It was clear to the cop who shot him. If he said so, Than it must be true.", ">>{whoopiethereitis} : > Sorry i forgot racist couldn't hate their own race. What? So you're implying the black police officer is racist? > If he said so, Than it must be true. Were you there? No? Neither was I. Its what you do at this stage... consider firsthand accounts. Meanwhile there is obviously some video and an investigation.", ">>{rpgmarvin} : I 'm implying that he could be, Not that he is. He could also just be abusing his power. I don't think either of us was there. Just asking to see the video, rather than just believe what a cop said or what witnesses saw.", ">>{Risley} : Oh that's right, that one guy actually deserved it that time. Guess that means they always do.", ">>{whoopiethereitis} : > I 'm implying that he could be, Not that he is. He could also just be abusing his power. > I don't think either of us was there. Just asking to see the video, rather than just believe what a cop said or what witnesses saw. Good to see you're trying to wait for evidence before passing judgement: > This is about a **police officer** killing a minority, It doesn't matter if the cop was a minority. People can be racist against their own race too. Oh wait. Edit: [here's the video of the daughter berating the police](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VewkpLpTLl8), calling all of the white people crackers, and saying all the white men rape their daughters and the women fuck horses. Yeah, the cops are the racists...", '>>{UncleMeat} : If "bad shoots" just happen, maybe we should reconsider how much power we give the police. This sort of thing doesn\'t tend to happen in Europe.', '>>{rpgmarvin} : Go call your parents, Ask them to read the comments to you.', '>>{wtfIhateTrumpnow} : They were. He was actually holding a paint brush.', ">>{arguablytrue} : And that governor? Ronald Reagan. Why the downvote? It's true.", '>>{wtfIhateTrumpnow} : I remember a black militia given space to burn things down in Ferguson. the headline should have said "black militia takes over city."', ">>{Risley} : Bla bla bla you're still wrong. Even if you can't see it, we do, and there's more of us than you.", '>>{buchanan_smith} : do we have to pay for the Washington Post website to view it or am i doing something wrong', '>>{Amida0616} : Well Chicago and DC tried an outright gun ban. You dont think that is constitutionally problematic?', ">>{Fatfaggottreat1} : That's odd, I'm brown and can buy a gun whenever I want. It helps that I'm not a fucking hood rat with a criminal record.", '>>{auspicious123456} : Not really, as there are a lot of documented cases where the gun was "visible". You\'re just taking one example and spreading it to all instances.', ">>{linkprovidor} : If you read the article you'd see your comment has absolutely nothing to do with the discussion at hand. Not once is buying guns mentioned in the article. Read it, you might learn something.", ">>{Fatfaggottreat1} : I read it, it's just a bunch of bullshit. It's an opinion peace with no facts or figures to back up the bullshit opinions.", ">>{BrainPenetrator} : Not really. Just like Obama says, it's far easier to get a gun than a book. Guns are for everyone!", ">>{IHateSelfishPeople} : > I'm brown That doesn't surprise me, since you are a piece of shit.", ">>{fitzroy95} : The NRA of the 60s (Civil Rights era) and the NRA of the current era are completely different political animals. The NRA used to encourage safety, training, sensible gun control, until 1977 when their complete board of directors was purged and replaced by 2A fanatics. Its called the ['Cincinnati Revolt](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-nras-true-believers-converted-a-marksmanship-group-into-a-mighty-gun-lobby/2013/01/12/51c62288-59b9-11e2-88d0-c4cf65c3ad15_story.html), and is the sole reason for the NRA being the gun lobby's marketing wing nowdays.", '>>{fitzroy95} : Because nowdays they are absolute stark raving nuts, back in the 60s they were much more sensible, adaptable, and willing to negotiate to find solutions to issues', '>>{Fatfaggottreat1} : Nope, just not a blm rioter and race baiter.', '>>{whoopiethereitis} : Welcome to the conversation; not sure that\'s the argument you want to lead with though. Having a gun "visible" in front of a cop that is questioning/arresting/pulling you over is the wrong time to start getting combative.', ">>{whoopiethereitis} : [I thought you might find this interesting, but probably won't change your mind.](http://www.wcnc.com/mb/news/local/new-revelations-in-keith-scott-case_/326706427)"]]

classify and reply

[">>{madfrogurt} : Trump Calls Clinton 'Close to Unhinged,' Assures He's Pro-Baby", ">>{madfrogurt} : 1. Trump's projection is so painfully obvious that I'm amazed anyone who has taken a single goddamn basic psych class can vote for him. 2. *This Is A Real Headline.*", '>>{badgers0511} : I\'ll take "close to unhinged" over "completely unhinged" every day of the week.', '>>{winstonjpenobscot} : The "pot calling the kettle black" aphorism isn\'t that both are black, it\'s that the pot sees his own reflection in the shiny, mirror-like kettle.', ">>{HollywoodCote} : Of course he's pro-baby. Without babies, Trump would never find a set of gloves that fit.", '>>{Suerg} : The question is, have they taken basic psych courses?', '>>{CaulkusAurelis} : This may displace the whole "Held his nose and voted for XXX" scenario "Errahhh, we decided that "mildly deranged was WAY better choice that "unhinged psychotic"', ">>{NYCSCV} : Lol 'Assures he's pro-baby' This is some genius campaigning. Maybe he can assure everyone he's pro-food and water in his next rally.", '>>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Pro tip: if you constantly have to say you "love babies", you probably don\'t love babies. From what I\'ve read trump was an absent father . Never even changed a diaper .', ">>{haxamin} : Of course he's pro-baby. He does have ties to *NAMBLA* or so I've heard.", ">>{bjb406} : > From what I've read trump was an absent father Only until Ivanka hit puberty. Then he became very involved.", ">>{XSavageWalrusX} : You know, I have been hearing people all over say he has ties with NAMBLA, but I just wonder if him releasing his tax returns would clear that up? idk, that's just what people are saying...", ">>{John-AtWork} : Yeah, Hillary is far from unhinged, she's not trust wothy, but not crazy -- from from it. I don't think she's said a single thing that hasn't been calculated. I guess the next several days will be telling. If Trump keeps acting like a nut then he's definitely trying not to become president, if he starts getting under control then he's actually much more likely to be a lunatic once he gets into the office.", '>>{John-AtWork} : I think it is more corrupt vs. crazy.', ">>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Jesus that's a great comment . When I can get to a computer next week I will give you gold, promise (can't do on mobile )", ">>{AleredEgo} : I love babies. That's who I steal the gloves off of on cold winter nights!", '>>{John-AtWork} : [Here is the speech if you want to see it.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRIijYfJLCk)', ">>{Minguseyes} : Well you wouldn't want the wrong lizard to win would you ?", '>>{JohnnyRandazzo} : I think the funny thing about this is that the media made this a topic for him to even make a statement. It points out that the media turned something into nothing for the sake of making political news.', '>>{JohnnyRandazzo} : Yeah suggesting that a person committed a sexual crime is hilarious. If this were about Clinton it would be sexist though.', ">>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : The shoe fits. He was making inappropriate comments about her since she was a baby. I'm not saying he banged his daughter but it sure as fuck seems like he wants to.", '>>{yeauxlo} : Most politicians have a few things theyre shady about. I give obama a pass on that weird ransom thing. I give clinton a pass on the emails. I can give trump a pass on banning muslims, the latino judge, a lack of an understanding of a nuclear triad...and I still wont be thru his list', '>>{hahajoke} : Truly ashamed that the GOP nominated someone on the NAMBLA mailing list', '>>{Hee443TS} : The headline is genius and I love it. Its so funny.', '>>{Hee443TS} : A lot of smart people have been talking about it too!', '>>{oblivious_human} : Wrong. He did change diapers. How else he would have checked out her thighs? I feel dirty writing this comment.', '>>{holocauster-ride} : His entire campaign has been to bait the media with a tweet and then say "oops I guess I misspoke in an informal conversation on Twitter. My bad"', ">>{ham666} : Without babies he also wouldn't have a sufficient source of the rare Orange dye he bathes in", '>>{TheDarkAgniRises} : Lex Luthor vs the Joker. Of fucking course im voting Lex Luthor.', ">>{TheMagicMarkerMan} : I'm not surprised, he's pro-baby and pro-young boy, just check the support he gives for NAMBLA. Never too young for Trump.", ">>{sandernista_4_TRUMP} : So the media should act just as irresponsibly? Sorry, but the media and its obsession for ratings actually *made* Trump and he hilariously exploits it to its logical conclusion by creating his own political theory: Trumpism. You need to stop blaming him for everything and jumping on things that aren't true because it won't stop the next Trump.", '>>{holocauster-ride} : I agree with you. Trump is a media mastermind.', '>>{lankist} : His strategy is actually "I\'m rubber, you\'re glue" at this point.', '>>{yeshua1986} : He did openly wish he could date her, so....']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{madfrogurt} : Trump Calls Clinton 'Close to Unhinged,' Assures He's Pro-Baby", ">>{madfrogurt} : 1. Trump's projection is so painfully obvious that I'm amazed anyone who has taken a single goddamn basic psych class can vote for him. 2. *This Is A Real Headline.*", '>>{badgers0511} : I\'ll take "close to unhinged" over "completely unhinged" every day of the week.', '>>{winstonjpenobscot} : The "pot calling the kettle black" aphorism isn\'t that both are black, it\'s that the pot sees his own reflection in the shiny, mirror-like kettle.', ">>{HollywoodCote} : Of course he's pro-baby. Without babies, Trump would never find a set of gloves that fit.", '>>{Suerg} : The question is, have they taken basic psych courses?', '>>{CaulkusAurelis} : This may displace the whole "Held his nose and voted for XXX" scenario "Errahhh, we decided that "mildly deranged was WAY better choice that "unhinged psychotic"', ">>{NYCSCV} : Lol 'Assures he's pro-baby' This is some genius campaigning. Maybe he can assure everyone he's pro-food and water in his next rally.", '>>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Pro tip: if you constantly have to say you "love babies", you probably don\'t love babies. From what I\'ve read trump was an absent father . Never even changed a diaper .', ">>{haxamin} : Of course he's pro-baby. He does have ties to *NAMBLA* or so I've heard.", ">>{bjb406} : > From what I've read trump was an absent father Only until Ivanka hit puberty. Then he became very involved.", ">>{XSavageWalrusX} : You know, I have been hearing people all over say he has ties with NAMBLA, but I just wonder if him releasing his tax returns would clear that up? idk, that's just what people are saying...", ">>{John-AtWork} : Yeah, Hillary is far from unhinged, she's not trust wothy, but not crazy -- from from it. I don't think she's said a single thing that hasn't been calculated. I guess the next several days will be telling. If Trump keeps acting like a nut then he's definitely trying not to become president, if he starts getting under control then he's actually much more likely to be a lunatic once he gets into the office.", '>>{John-AtWork} : I think it is more corrupt vs. crazy.', ">>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Jesus that's a great comment . When I can get to a computer next week I will give you gold, promise (can't do on mobile )", ">>{AleredEgo} : I love babies. That's who I steal the gloves off of on cold winter nights!", '>>{John-AtWork} : [Here is the speech if you want to see it.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRIijYfJLCk)', ">>{Minguseyes} : Well you wouldn't want the wrong lizard to win would you ?", '>>{JohnnyRandazzo} : I think the funny thing about this is that the media made this a topic for him to even make a statement. It points out that the media turned something into nothing for the sake of making political news.', '>>{JohnnyRandazzo} : Yeah suggesting that a person committed a sexual crime is hilarious. If this were about Clinton it would be sexist though.', ">>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : The shoe fits. He was making inappropriate comments about her since she was a baby. I'm not saying he banged his daughter but it sure as fuck seems like he wants to.", '>>{yeauxlo} : Most politicians have a few things theyre shady about. I give obama a pass on that weird ransom thing. I give clinton a pass on the emails. I can give trump a pass on banning muslims, the latino judge, a lack of an understanding of a nuclear triad...and I still wont be thru his list', '>>{hahajoke} : Truly ashamed that the GOP nominated someone on the NAMBLA mailing list', '>>{Hee443TS} : The headline is genius and I love it. Its so funny.', '>>{Hee443TS} : A lot of smart people have been talking about it too!', '>>{oblivious_human} : Wrong. He did change diapers. How else he would have checked out her thighs? I feel dirty writing this comment.', '>>{holocauster-ride} : His entire campaign has been to bait the media with a tweet and then say "oops I guess I misspoke in an informal conversation on Twitter. My bad"', ">>{ham666} : Without babies he also wouldn't have a sufficient source of the rare Orange dye he bathes in", '>>{TheDarkAgniRises} : Lex Luthor vs the Joker. Of fucking course im voting Lex Luthor.', ">>{TheMagicMarkerMan} : I'm not surprised, he's pro-baby and pro-young boy, just check the support he gives for NAMBLA. Never too young for Trump.", ">>{sandernista_4_TRUMP} : So the media should act just as irresponsibly? Sorry, but the media and its obsession for ratings actually *made* Trump and he hilariously exploits it to its logical conclusion by creating his own political theory: Trumpism. You need to stop blaming him for everything and jumping on things that aren't true because it won't stop the next Trump.", '>>{holocauster-ride} : I agree with you. Trump is a media mastermind.', '>>{lankist} : His strategy is actually "I\'m rubber, you\'re glue" at this point.', '>>{yeshua1986} : He did openly wish he could date her, so....']]

classify and reply

['>>{xrm67} : Congressman To File Bill Requiring A Psychiatrist At The White House', ">>{DPlaintiff} : If it's good enough for Star Fleet, it's good enough for the white house.", ">>{Stoaks} : Disregarding stigmas about Trump's mental health for just a moment. This is a really good idea, if Obama's aging process is any indicator, then the presidency is a very demanding and stressful job. Also I think it would go a long way to help the brand of mental health to have the Commander and Chief having regular contact with a Psychiatrist. The is a lot of mentally ill people who think psychiatry is just for the crazies. Edit: Kind of relevant, going to alternativefacts.com actually takes you [here](https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/here-there-and-everywhere/201701/gaslighting-know-it-and-identify-it-protect-yourself)", '>>{lod001} : If the psychiatrist ends up being a woman, I predict Trump will make her dress exactly as Deanna Troi did!', '>>{BatCountryTourist} : If devious Democratic operatives had conspired last year to sabotage the Republican Party by poisoning its already troubled relationship with young voters and Latinos and other minorities, they could not have devised anything nearly so effective as what the GOP came up with on its own.', '>>{Ionic_Pancakes} : Yeah - this\'ll fly like a sack of potatoes. Is it a good idea? Yeah - but do you see a lot of people "introspective" enough personalities taking advantage of their services? To consult help you have to first think there is a problem.l', '>>{stupid-rando} : Are you kidding me? If the writers at The Onion had all dropped acid and decided to spend their trip creating a parody of the most insane and destructive satirical candidate imaginable, they would not have created a character nearly as surreal and unbelievable as the candidate that the GOP currently refuses to abandon.', ">>{svtboosted} : I like it. Mental health issues are real, psychiatry is real and is actually beneficial. There's actually a lot of people out there with undiagnosed issues and don't even know it.", '>>{NameRetrievalError} : this was 30 years of crazy building up. the lid finally popped off.', '>>{IDFSHILL} : The GOP strategy was clearly moving towards a "Hispanic strategy" as well and Trump comes along and ruins the entire thing. I don\'t think a lot of people realize how much damage Trump has done to the GOP, it going to be insane. The republicans are going to have to rebrand, they can\'t keep ignoring every demographic outside of their core base.', ">>{justjack48} : Can't agree more. They're fighting a battle they cannot possibly win the way they're playing it. Trump is putting every single ugly aspect of the GOP, on center stage with a microphone. They will cease to exist within 50 years if they don't modernize.", '>>{LostWoodsInTheField} : We have people in our schools (counselors / psychiatrists) to help kids with their every day lives / etc so why not in the white house?', ">>{stupid-rando} : So true. Young adults are his worst demographic, and that's when voting habits get set. The imprint of the GOP brand that's reality for them right now will be a drag on the party for decades.", ">>{DjCyric} : I realize this is tongue in cheek, but honestly I support it regardless of who is in charge. A President's job is incredibly stressful. I am sure they have mental health breakdowns like the rest of us. There is nothing wrong with asking for help, and there is nothing wrong with receiving help. This will be a minor step in removing the stigma surrounding mental illness.", ">>{-Mountain-King-} : Lying doesn't inherently make you mental ill. Lying constantly, for no reason, about things that are easily checked, might.", ">>{ambientlozenge} : 2000: GWB wins on being centrist. 9/11 removed any need for him to be centrist, unfortunately. 2004: The Democrats launched a hate campaign again GWB that forced people to either claim that he was the devil incarnate, or vote for him. The people didn't believe he was the devil incarnate. The Democrats would have had an easy victory if they had talked about issues, but they didn't. 2008: Since GWB is not running, the Democrats cool down and both Hillary and Obama launch reasonable popular campaigns. The Republicans do the same, and McCain has a good centrist campaign and is the only one that can possibly win over Obama. So he gets nominated, and then chooses a moron for running mate. Obviously that wasn't going to work. 2012: The Republicans main argument against Obama is that he is the devil incarnate. Most voters disagree. 2016: Now with Obama out of the picture, does the Republicans cool down? No. Instead they ramp it up. Their main argument is still that you have to vote Republican because Obama is the devil incarnate, and so is Hillary, in fact. And once again, a lot of voters actually DO have a brain, so they disagree. And to make it worse, they nominate an egomaniac sociopath wanna-be-dictator who knows nothing about how a country is run, ensuring that only idiots vote for him. I don't see how they are to recover from this.", ">>{ambientlozenge} : Faster. They'll lose this election, and they'll do badly in congress as well, because of the synergy effect. Trump will claim the election was stolen, and his team will let it be known in no uncertain terms that they want a rebellion. There will be riots and fights on the streets. This is aimed at making people scared and vote republican, as Trump brands himself as the Strong Man who can Save America. This will either work, in which case he wins 2020 and increases the presidential power through a series of states of exceptions until he becomes dictator. Or it will NOT work, and he will lose in 2020 as well, and after that the Republican name will be viewed so negatively that the Republican party will not be able to get 50% in one single constituency. The Republican party will effectively cease to exist before 2024, and the Democrats will rule unhindered for a few decades before it splits.", '>>{wellwasherelf} : This is a great idea, though it will probably never happen *because* of the stigma around words like "psychiatrist", "therapist", etc. I\'m of the mindset that even if you have no underlying mental issues, that seeing a therapist is helpful for **anyone**. Everyone has stuff in their lives that they need to vent about sometimes. A therapist will listen to anything you have to say, and will (usually) offer you genuine input on what you\'re telling them. Or if you just want them to be a metaphorical punching bag, they\'ll be happy to just sit there and listen for an hour. It doesn\'t have to be often - maybe once a month or something - but it does a lot of good. Everyone already does this amongst friends and family, but it\'s good to have a 3rd party who is detached from the situation. edit: Maybe "counselor" is a more apt word. I wonder how more stigmatized couple\'s counseling would be if the widespread term for it were instead "couple\'s therapy".', '>>{verbose_gent} : If it fails, I hope it is presented during democratic leadership when the President would actually sign it.', '>>{lyth} : I agree completely. Having a mental health professional on site would be good for the leadership.', ">>{metaobject} : And in his first speech (after descending the escalator), he wasted no time offending Hispanics. It's almost like it was on purpose.", ">>{toonytoon180} : Yeah seriously. The pot of greed, ignorance, self-contradiction, and hypocrisy has been boiling for years. Now it's boiling over and making a big mess. Donald Trump isn't the overfilled pot, Donald Trump is the mess.", '>>{bonafidebob} : Reminded of "The President\'s Analyst," a 1967 film with James Coburn as the shrink, it\'s a dangerous job! https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0035JNSO8', '>>{Buttstache} : Here the thing: if you see any article that begins "Congressman/Senator introduces a bill to..." and they\'re a democrat? Just ignore the article. That bill is dying faster than a Yemeni civilian.', ">>{gloomyMoron} : Fun Fact: Deanna Troi's mother was played by Roddenberry's wife, who also did the voice of the computer.", ">>{ryanknapper} : >Billy, that's the *car* gun. If you want to play with one please put that back and use the living room gun.", ">>{ryanknapper} : Are sessions with the shrink mandatory? I'd bet that anyone who needs it isn't going to go. I'd also bet there are lots of nuts with psychology degrees who'd say Trump is just fine.", '>>{Rad_Spencer} : 2000: Really more a mix of the Right being fired up and pissed off about the Clinton Sex scandal cause Gore to distance himself from that administration and not being very charismatic in his own right. Coupled with the lefts complacency leading to low voter turnout and people voting third party to "send a message". Topped with Bush\'s being charismatic and the last eight years being good despite all the scandals, voters really bought into the idea that "anybody" could be president so they sided with who they though was more likable. Even then is was an incredibly close race. 2004: 9/11 was only 3 years old and America has radically changed, becoming much more fearful regarding foreign threats and just starting the Iraq war which at this point enough people truly though would make us safer. This was a time when it was classically though that Republicans where the party of national security and Democrats were the party of weak peace nicks (Reagan vs Carter) Plenty of people, especially on the left were all for calling Bush the devil. However that\'s not at all what the Democrats were pushing as a narrative. They were split on the Iraq war with most of them having approved at some stage or another, and were attempted to to go high wall the GOP went low. Remember, Kerry was being "swift boated" and this was at the high of Karl Rove\'s smear campaign among anyone on the left. Kerry and the Democrats lost because they lacked passion and couldn\'t get a clear simple message out if there life depended on it. 2008: The Iraq war was proving to be neither quick nor clean and the public was tired of it. The Bush administration did not run anyone so the nominee was his rival during the 2000 primary. The Democrats finally found someone who could speak with a little passion and firing up voters who usually stayed home. McCain made a hasty and sloppy VP pick which, and the economy which had been running for years under Republican control tanked hard. This was illustrated by McCain saying "the fundamentals of the economy are strong" right before the collapse. Basically the result of the Bush administration was people no longer say the GOP as being good with foreign policy or fiscal policy. 2012: The Republicans had done to Obama what they\'ve done to every Democratic president since Carter, attack his legitimacy at every turn. They had been laying the ground work since the last election to paint Obama as a one term Carter incarnate. Unfortunately because the main problems at the time could easily be blamed on the Bush administration, and the nation was doing better in the last few years this narrative wasn\'t effective enough. Plus Romney, completely lacked the common man personal that Bush had the resonated with voters so well, and was a Mormon with strained support for the GOP\'s evangelical base. This election boiled down to a narrative of Obama in the middle of cleaning up a Republican mess, and the Republican\'s were unable to justify why their policies should be adopted again. However, Obama revealed himself to be painfully moderate and unable to effect the change many of his supports voted for leading in a weakening in that base. 2016: The GOP has been attacking Clinton for 20 years and have conditioned themselves to see her being becoming president as unthinkable. Who despite numerous smear campaign, has managed to earn dislike in her own right from both the right and the left. Her general lack of popularity is such a problem that is would take a madman to scare the electorate so bad they they would rush to support her, if only to prevent his rise to a position of power.', '>>{stupid-rando} : I just mean to speak the obvious truth that he should never be President.', ">>{spartan6222} : Ya but don't put that on the Republican party (some of the voters sure) The party is pretty powerless at this point concerning Trump. They can't kick him off the ticket. They could all disavow him but then they lose like every set in the senate and the house of reps that is even close to contestable. Repub parties best option is to sit down and shut up and hope it all blows over and they can run someone sane against Hillary in 4 years.", '>>{ambientlozenge} : You are right about 2000 (and so am I, those are both reasons Bush won). But I stand by that 2004 the Democrats lost by demonizing Bush. Every single time I discussed politics I ended up defending Bush from ridiculous claims, from the claim that he\'s stupid, to the claim that he was behind 9/11. And I didn\'t agree with Bush on ANYTHING. That was ALL that election was about: "Bush is the Devil" vs "I\'m protecting America!" Bush was WAY more believable. That\'s why he won. I can\'t say for certain that the Democrats would have won, but considering that it was quite close, I think they would have, if they had attacked Bush on the ISSUES, not on person. Because his policies were awful. 2008: Yeah, I don\'t think McCain had a chance even if he had chosen a running mate with a brain. I just couldn\'t help stab at her. ;-) 2012: You are right that they attack Democrat presidents legitimacy all the time, but with Clinton they actually pointed at real issues, like him lying about Monika Lewinsky, etc. The impeachment was ridiculous and doomed to failure, of course. But compare that to the attempts of discrediting Obama, with the birther movement and insisting that he is muslim? It\'s just as insane as democrats claiming Bush was behind 9/11. US politics have gone insane, and it\'s probably 9/11\'s fault, actually. What we see now with Trump is the direct result of that, and if the Republicans doesn\'t denounce him and step away from him soon, this will mean the end of the party.', '>>{Rad_Spencer} : > That was ALL that election was about: "Bush is the Devil" vs "I\'m protecting America!" I wish the Democrats did something this bold in 2004, but they didn\'t. Any rhetoric even close to that was from war protesters, or fringe elements. Not from the campaign or the party. Literally demonize political opponents is relatively new and virtually always coming from the right.', ">>{Chr1sPy5170} : While having the psychiatrist there for the president is great; it'd also be amazing for them to support the first family as a whole, whose world was turned upside down after the election.", ">>{stupid-rando} : At some point (definitely reached by now), it would be a matter of conscience for me. And if Republican voters are such petulant children that they think unconditional support for a lunatic as President is more important than supporting good representatives from their own states, then the future is bleak for the party anyway. I shouldn't be surprised, though, since doing the right thing or acting selflessly is a foreign concept to most politicians. Acting on principle probably doesn't even enter their minds.", ">>{ambientlozenge} : It didn't come from the campaign, or party officials no, but party members. And that's exactly as true about the demonizing of Obama. Neither party is blameless here. But yes, it's the GOP that has collapsed and gone full on bonkers.", '>>{anotherswingingdick} : Is Joe Biden a veteran? Is he entitled to psychiatric care at the VA hospital for his habit of feeling up young girls?', '>>{spartan6222} : >unconditional support They are not giving unconditional support. They are not really giving support at all more of "well this sucks, but we can\'t really change it" They are talks about pulling funding from Trump all together to fund down ballot races more', '>>{Jimmaplesong} : While mental health is a concern, a psychologist might encourage Trump to express how he feels even more. "and how does Nordstrom\'s make you feel mr president?" How about a White House Scientist? One with a remote control that can give Mr President a mild shock when feelings start to trump evidence.', '>>{GoalDirectedBehavior} : As a neuropsychologist and someone who has worked in arguably best multidisciplinary clinic in the US, this bill should be revised to require a behavioral neurologist rather than a psychiatrist, but otherwise this is absolutely a great idea.', '>>{factsRcool} : Beautiful! Now get the taxes out in the open!', '>>{stupid-rando} : There I was talking about voters he feel a need to "punish" politicians who aren\'t supporting Trump. I realize the party is moving, in a nuanced way, to some level of non-support. Ultimately, though, if you say you\'re going to vote for him and you think others should too, that\'s the strongest aspect of support you can give.', '>>{skysterman} : I agree, I think if the highest office in the land had a psychiatrist and was open about it more people would be willing to try therapy for their problems and talk openly about what might be an untreated mental illness.', ">>{Criterion515} : Majel Barrett, who has been in more episodes of ST than anyone , in many roles (longest role as the computer voice through multiple ST incarnations). I'll always remember her as Nurse Chapel.", '>>{spartan6222} : I strongly suspect that many people will privately not vote for him', ">>{stonersmith} : I think that it's been shown that sociopaths gravitate to positions of power so all of DC should be on the psychiatrist's radar.", '>>{Rad_Spencer} : > or party officials no, but party members What distinction are you making between party officials and party members?', ">>{stupid-rando} : Good point. For just one example, I really can't see McCain pulling that lever.", '>>{ambientlozenge} : Well, I mean the top officials in the party, really. What an official is can hardly be th question, right?', '>>{Rad_Spencer} : You said officials didn\'t but members did. "Member" of a major party covers an incredibly broad range of people to reference when making claims about the parties campaigns tactics.', '>>{Aperfectmoment} : Yeah I can see why some conspiracy theorists say Trump is actually a democrat/actor who speaks loud the undertone in the sentiment Fox news and the right wing have been feeding their Demographic. I mean what better way to devide a party than to put a diversion in that targets the sentiment the GOP normally exploits with greater precision than the party establishment. The voters that the republicans use but dont actually care for......its like the republicans have had zombie voters all these years and Trump just ran and offered free brains.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{BatCountryTourist} : If devious Democratic operatives had conspired last year to sabotage the Republican Party by poisoning its already troubled relationship with young voters and Latinos and other minorities, they could not have devised anything nearly so effective as what the GOP came up with on its own.', '>>{stupid-rando} : Are you kidding me? If the writers at The Onion had all dropped acid and decided to spend their trip creating a parody of the most insane and destructive satirical candidate imaginable, they would not have created a character nearly as surreal and unbelievable as the candidate that the GOP currently refuses to abandon.', '>>{NameRetrievalError} : this was 30 years of crazy building up. the lid finally popped off.', '>>{IDFSHILL} : The GOP strategy was clearly moving towards a "Hispanic strategy" as well and Trump comes along and ruins the entire thing. I don\'t think a lot of people realize how much damage Trump has done to the GOP, it going to be insane. The republicans are going to have to rebrand, they can\'t keep ignoring every demographic outside of their core base.', ">>{justjack48} : Can't agree more. They're fighting a battle they cannot possibly win the way they're playing it. Trump is putting every single ugly aspect of the GOP, on center stage with a microphone. They will cease to exist within 50 years if they don't modernize.", ">>{stupid-rando} : So true. Young adults are his worst demographic, and that's when voting habits get set. The imprint of the GOP brand that's reality for them right now will be a drag on the party for decades.", ">>{ambientlozenge} : 2000: GWB wins on being centrist. 9/11 removed any need for him to be centrist, unfortunately. 2004: The Democrats launched a hate campaign again GWB that forced people to either claim that he was the devil incarnate, or vote for him. The people didn't believe he was the devil incarnate. The Democrats would have had an easy victory if they had talked about issues, but they didn't. 2008: Since GWB is not running, the Democrats cool down and both Hillary and Obama launch reasonable popular campaigns. The Republicans do the same, and McCain has a good centrist campaign and is the only one that can possibly win over Obama. So he gets nominated, and then chooses a moron for running mate. Obviously that wasn't going to work. 2012: The Republicans main argument against Obama is that he is the devil incarnate. Most voters disagree. 2016: Now with Obama out of the picture, does the Republicans cool down? No. Instead they ramp it up. Their main argument is still that you have to vote Republican because Obama is the devil incarnate, and so is Hillary, in fact. And once again, a lot of voters actually DO have a brain, so they disagree. And to make it worse, they nominate an egomaniac sociopath wanna-be-dictator who knows nothing about how a country is run, ensuring that only idiots vote for him. I don't see how they are to recover from this.", ">>{ambientlozenge} : Faster. They'll lose this election, and they'll do badly in congress as well, because of the synergy effect. Trump will claim the election was stolen, and his team will let it be known in no uncertain terms that they want a rebellion. There will be riots and fights on the streets. This is aimed at making people scared and vote republican, as Trump brands himself as the Strong Man who can Save America. This will either work, in which case he wins 2020 and increases the presidential power through a series of states of exceptions until he becomes dictator. Or it will NOT work, and he will lose in 2020 as well, and after that the Republican name will be viewed so negatively that the Republican party will not be able to get 50% in one single constituency. The Republican party will effectively cease to exist before 2024, and the Democrats will rule unhindered for a few decades before it splits.", ">>{metaobject} : And in his first speech (after descending the escalator), he wasted no time offending Hispanics. It's almost like it was on purpose.", ">>{toonytoon180} : Yeah seriously. The pot of greed, ignorance, self-contradiction, and hypocrisy has been boiling for years. Now it's boiling over and making a big mess. Donald Trump isn't the overfilled pot, Donald Trump is the mess.", '>>{Rad_Spencer} : 2000: Really more a mix of the Right being fired up and pissed off about the Clinton Sex scandal cause Gore to distance himself from that administration and not being very charismatic in his own right. Coupled with the lefts complacency leading to low voter turnout and people voting third party to "send a message". Topped with Bush\'s being charismatic and the last eight years being good despite all the scandals, voters really bought into the idea that "anybody" could be president so they sided with who they though was more likable. Even then is was an incredibly close race. 2004: 9/11 was only 3 years old and America has radically changed, becoming much more fearful regarding foreign threats and just starting the Iraq war which at this point enough people truly though would make us safer. This was a time when it was classically though that Republicans where the party of national security and Democrats were the party of weak peace nicks (Reagan vs Carter) Plenty of people, especially on the left were all for calling Bush the devil. However that\'s not at all what the Democrats were pushing as a narrative. They were split on the Iraq war with most of them having approved at some stage or another, and were attempted to to go high wall the GOP went low. Remember, Kerry was being "swift boated" and this was at the high of Karl Rove\'s smear campaign among anyone on the left. Kerry and the Democrats lost because they lacked passion and couldn\'t get a clear simple message out if there life depended on it. 2008: The Iraq war was proving to be neither quick nor clean and the public was tired of it. The Bush administration did not run anyone so the nominee was his rival during the 2000 primary. The Democrats finally found someone who could speak with a little passion and firing up voters who usually stayed home. McCain made a hasty and sloppy VP pick which, and the economy which had been running for years under Republican control tanked hard. This was illustrated by McCain saying "the fundamentals of the economy are strong" right before the collapse. Basically the result of the Bush administration was people no longer say the GOP as being good with foreign policy or fiscal policy. 2012: The Republicans had done to Obama what they\'ve done to every Democratic president since Carter, attack his legitimacy at every turn. They had been laying the ground work since the last election to paint Obama as a one term Carter incarnate. Unfortunately because the main problems at the time could easily be blamed on the Bush administration, and the nation was doing better in the last few years this narrative wasn\'t effective enough. Plus Romney, completely lacked the common man personal that Bush had the resonated with voters so well, and was a Mormon with strained support for the GOP\'s evangelical base. This election boiled down to a narrative of Obama in the middle of cleaning up a Republican mess, and the Republican\'s were unable to justify why their policies should be adopted again. However, Obama revealed himself to be painfully moderate and unable to effect the change many of his supports voted for leading in a weakening in that base. 2016: The GOP has been attacking Clinton for 20 years and have conditioned themselves to see her being becoming president as unthinkable. Who despite numerous smear campaign, has managed to earn dislike in her own right from both the right and the left. Her general lack of popularity is such a problem that is would take a madman to scare the electorate so bad they they would rush to support her, if only to prevent his rise to a position of power.', '>>{stupid-rando} : I just mean to speak the obvious truth that he should never be President.', ">>{spartan6222} : Ya but don't put that on the Republican party (some of the voters sure) The party is pretty powerless at this point concerning Trump. They can't kick him off the ticket. They could all disavow him but then they lose like every set in the senate and the house of reps that is even close to contestable. Repub parties best option is to sit down and shut up and hope it all blows over and they can run someone sane against Hillary in 4 years.", '>>{ambientlozenge} : You are right about 2000 (and so am I, those are both reasons Bush won). But I stand by that 2004 the Democrats lost by demonizing Bush. Every single time I discussed politics I ended up defending Bush from ridiculous claims, from the claim that he\'s stupid, to the claim that he was behind 9/11. And I didn\'t agree with Bush on ANYTHING. That was ALL that election was about: "Bush is the Devil" vs "I\'m protecting America!" Bush was WAY more believable. That\'s why he won. I can\'t say for certain that the Democrats would have won, but considering that it was quite close, I think they would have, if they had attacked Bush on the ISSUES, not on person. Because his policies were awful. 2008: Yeah, I don\'t think McCain had a chance even if he had chosen a running mate with a brain. I just couldn\'t help stab at her. ;-) 2012: You are right that they attack Democrat presidents legitimacy all the time, but with Clinton they actually pointed at real issues, like him lying about Monika Lewinsky, etc. The impeachment was ridiculous and doomed to failure, of course. But compare that to the attempts of discrediting Obama, with the birther movement and insisting that he is muslim? It\'s just as insane as democrats claiming Bush was behind 9/11. US politics have gone insane, and it\'s probably 9/11\'s fault, actually. What we see now with Trump is the direct result of that, and if the Republicans doesn\'t denounce him and step away from him soon, this will mean the end of the party.', '>>{Rad_Spencer} : > That was ALL that election was about: "Bush is the Devil" vs "I\'m protecting America!" I wish the Democrats did something this bold in 2004, but they didn\'t. Any rhetoric even close to that was from war protesters, or fringe elements. Not from the campaign or the party. Literally demonize political opponents is relatively new and virtually always coming from the right.', ">>{stupid-rando} : At some point (definitely reached by now), it would be a matter of conscience for me. And if Republican voters are such petulant children that they think unconditional support for a lunatic as President is more important than supporting good representatives from their own states, then the future is bleak for the party anyway. I shouldn't be surprised, though, since doing the right thing or acting selflessly is a foreign concept to most politicians. Acting on principle probably doesn't even enter their minds.", ">>{ambientlozenge} : It didn't come from the campaign, or party officials no, but party members. And that's exactly as true about the demonizing of Obama. Neither party is blameless here. But yes, it's the GOP that has collapsed and gone full on bonkers.", '>>{spartan6222} : >unconditional support They are not giving unconditional support. They are not really giving support at all more of "well this sucks, but we can\'t really change it" They are talks about pulling funding from Trump all together to fund down ballot races more', '>>{stupid-rando} : There I was talking about voters he feel a need to "punish" politicians who aren\'t supporting Trump. I realize the party is moving, in a nuanced way, to some level of non-support. Ultimately, though, if you say you\'re going to vote for him and you think others should too, that\'s the strongest aspect of support you can give.', '>>{spartan6222} : I strongly suspect that many people will privately not vote for him', '>>{Rad_Spencer} : > or party officials no, but party members What distinction are you making between party officials and party members?', ">>{stupid-rando} : Good point. For just one example, I really can't see McCain pulling that lever.", '>>{ambientlozenge} : Well, I mean the top officials in the party, really. What an official is can hardly be th question, right?', '>>{Rad_Spencer} : You said officials didn\'t but members did. "Member" of a major party covers an incredibly broad range of people to reference when making claims about the parties campaigns tactics.', '>>{Aperfectmoment} : Yeah I can see why some conspiracy theorists say Trump is actually a democrat/actor who speaks loud the undertone in the sentiment Fox news and the right wing have been feeding their Demographic. I mean what better way to devide a party than to put a diversion in that targets the sentiment the GOP normally exploits with greater precision than the party establishment. The voters that the republicans use but dont actually care for......its like the republicans have had zombie voters all these years and Trump just ran and offered free brains.'], ['>>{xrm67} : Congressman To File Bill Requiring A Psychiatrist At The White House', ">>{DPlaintiff} : If it's good enough for Star Fleet, it's good enough for the white house.", ">>{Stoaks} : Disregarding stigmas about Trump's mental health for just a moment. This is a really good idea, if Obama's aging process is any indicator, then the presidency is a very demanding and stressful job. Also I think it would go a long way to help the brand of mental health to have the Commander and Chief having regular contact with a Psychiatrist. The is a lot of mentally ill people who think psychiatry is just for the crazies. Edit: Kind of relevant, going to alternativefacts.com actually takes you [here](https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/here-there-and-everywhere/201701/gaslighting-know-it-and-identify-it-protect-yourself)", '>>{lod001} : If the psychiatrist ends up being a woman, I predict Trump will make her dress exactly as Deanna Troi did!', '>>{Ionic_Pancakes} : Yeah - this\'ll fly like a sack of potatoes. Is it a good idea? Yeah - but do you see a lot of people "introspective" enough personalities taking advantage of their services? To consult help you have to first think there is a problem.l', ">>{svtboosted} : I like it. Mental health issues are real, psychiatry is real and is actually beneficial. There's actually a lot of people out there with undiagnosed issues and don't even know it.", '>>{LostWoodsInTheField} : We have people in our schools (counselors / psychiatrists) to help kids with their every day lives / etc so why not in the white house?', ">>{DjCyric} : I realize this is tongue in cheek, but honestly I support it regardless of who is in charge. A President's job is incredibly stressful. I am sure they have mental health breakdowns like the rest of us. There is nothing wrong with asking for help, and there is nothing wrong with receiving help. This will be a minor step in removing the stigma surrounding mental illness.", ">>{-Mountain-King-} : Lying doesn't inherently make you mental ill. Lying constantly, for no reason, about things that are easily checked, might.", '>>{wellwasherelf} : This is a great idea, though it will probably never happen *because* of the stigma around words like "psychiatrist", "therapist", etc. I\'m of the mindset that even if you have no underlying mental issues, that seeing a therapist is helpful for **anyone**. Everyone has stuff in their lives that they need to vent about sometimes. A therapist will listen to anything you have to say, and will (usually) offer you genuine input on what you\'re telling them. Or if you just want them to be a metaphorical punching bag, they\'ll be happy to just sit there and listen for an hour. It doesn\'t have to be often - maybe once a month or something - but it does a lot of good. Everyone already does this amongst friends and family, but it\'s good to have a 3rd party who is detached from the situation. edit: Maybe "counselor" is a more apt word. I wonder how more stigmatized couple\'s counseling would be if the widespread term for it were instead "couple\'s therapy".', '>>{verbose_gent} : If it fails, I hope it is presented during democratic leadership when the President would actually sign it.', '>>{lyth} : I agree completely. Having a mental health professional on site would be good for the leadership.', '>>{bonafidebob} : Reminded of "The President\'s Analyst," a 1967 film with James Coburn as the shrink, it\'s a dangerous job! https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0035JNSO8', '>>{Buttstache} : Here the thing: if you see any article that begins "Congressman/Senator introduces a bill to..." and they\'re a democrat? Just ignore the article. That bill is dying faster than a Yemeni civilian.', ">>{gloomyMoron} : Fun Fact: Deanna Troi's mother was played by Roddenberry's wife, who also did the voice of the computer.", ">>{ryanknapper} : >Billy, that's the *car* gun. If you want to play with one please put that back and use the living room gun.", ">>{ryanknapper} : Are sessions with the shrink mandatory? I'd bet that anyone who needs it isn't going to go. I'd also bet there are lots of nuts with psychology degrees who'd say Trump is just fine.", ">>{Chr1sPy5170} : While having the psychiatrist there for the president is great; it'd also be amazing for them to support the first family as a whole, whose world was turned upside down after the election.", '>>{anotherswingingdick} : Is Joe Biden a veteran? Is he entitled to psychiatric care at the VA hospital for his habit of feeling up young girls?', '>>{Jimmaplesong} : While mental health is a concern, a psychologist might encourage Trump to express how he feels even more. "and how does Nordstrom\'s make you feel mr president?" How about a White House Scientist? One with a remote control that can give Mr President a mild shock when feelings start to trump evidence.', '>>{GoalDirectedBehavior} : As a neuropsychologist and someone who has worked in arguably best multidisciplinary clinic in the US, this bill should be revised to require a behavioral neurologist rather than a psychiatrist, but otherwise this is absolutely a great idea.', '>>{factsRcool} : Beautiful! Now get the taxes out in the open!', '>>{skysterman} : I agree, I think if the highest office in the land had a psychiatrist and was open about it more people would be willing to try therapy for their problems and talk openly about what might be an untreated mental illness.', ">>{Criterion515} : Majel Barrett, who has been in more episodes of ST than anyone , in many roles (longest role as the computer voice through multiple ST incarnations). I'll always remember her as Nurse Chapel.", ">>{stonersmith} : I think that it's been shown that sociopaths gravitate to positions of power so all of DC should be on the psychiatrist's radar."]]

classify and reply

['>>{gin_and_sunshine} : Trump asks, "if we have nukes, why can\'t we use them?"', ">>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : I'm still waiting on a reliable source that isn't from MSNBC to show up and say this.", '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : >Mr Trump had asked a foreign-policy expert "why can\'t we use" nuclear weapons, according to MSNBC host Joe Scarborough, who said he spoke to the expert. So an anonymous source claimed that Trump asked that question and now Joe Scarborough on MSNBC (who spoke to that anonymous source) is reporting on it? Sounds legit.', ">>{Christiano_Donaldo} : of course we're willing to use nukes. saying anything less than that would be irresponsible in the age of MAD.", '>>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : Exactly. This story is just a massive hit piece with no facts.', '>>{moose_testes} : It would help if Trump had denied this, rather than stayed silent and allowed his team to put out a tacit admission through their question of why this is a bad question.', ">>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : Idk, a lot of those are more than just coincidence. Too bad that isn't a form of the Mainstream media. Still not sure how this has anything to do with what we are taking about.", '>>{GoblinDiplomat} : Has anyone in the media directly asked him or his campaign yet? Seems like this story is a pretty big deal.', '>>{DrunkenGenie} : You can look up his town hall where he asked the same thing.', ">>{throwaway029384756} : I don't think spending his time responding to idiotic allegations would in any possible way be a positive for him. Should he deny that he has small hands everytime it's mentioned?", ">>{RealDonaldTrump__} : I think I raise a very good point. Incompetent Obama and Crooked H have been fighting ISIS with what, like slingshots and catapults or something? I don't know. It's like they're losing to terrorists on purpose. Very low energy. When I'm in there we don't lose ok? You can mark it down, take it to the bank, sign it seal it deliver it, we don't lose to ISIS when I'm in there. If it takes one or two of these bombs okay that's what it takes. Obama is so weak on this stuff it's, you can't even believe how weak he is. I know how to fight ISIS and I think we'll be very successful, very successful in ISIS.", '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : I\'m not talking about anything at a town hall, I\'m talking about this claim in the article: >"I\'ll be very careful here. Several months ago, a foreign policy expert, on the international level, went to advise Donald Trump, and three times he asked about the use of nuclear weapons," Scarborough said on his program Morning Joe. >"Three times he asked. At one point, \'If we have them, why can\'t we use them?\'" Scarborough continued.', '>>{DrunkenGenie} : So you are saying that he would ask it at a town hall but never in private to a foreign policy expert?', ">>{DOG_BUTT_JESUS} : Dude's a fighter. Just ask Dana White. Some people have said he's the best fighter. I think we should all remember that he is also a Purple Heart recipient. The man knows his stuff!", ">>{RealDonaldTrump__} : Thank you for the kind words, /u/DOG_BUTT_JESUS . Most people agree I'm one of the best fighters, if not the best. Not everyone thinks so, I guess Obama isn't a huge fan [pauses for laughter] he's not a huge fan ok but he doesn't have a Purple Heart. More of a black heart, am I right? You know I'm right, ok.", '>>{Louisthefuckenlawyer} : Well he does. So he could make time for nukes.', ">>{Peter_Sparker_} : But this thread is talking about reliable sources? I'm lost. How was that link relevant again?", ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : There's a significant difference between saying it at a town hall and repeatedly asking a foreign policy expert about it. That being said, if you link me to the town hall where he asks this, I'll check it out. I know nothing of the context or way he said it, so I can't comment much more specifically without seeing it.", ">>{moose_testes} : >I don't think spending his time responding to idiotic allegations would in any possible way be a positive for him. You should let him know.", ">>{DrunkenGenie} : http://www.msnbc.com/hardball/watch/donald-trump-won-t-take-nukes-off-the-table-655471171934 And I'll point out he asks why do we make them if we aren't going to use them. Not asking why he can't use them. I'm not sure one is better than the other.", ">>{keepitwithmine} : Seems like a legit question. They are expensive to build and maintain. Maybe if we aren't planning on using all 6-8k or whatever we have we should decommission a few.", ">>{throwaway029384756} : I'm sure his staff have shared that with him already. If you agree, why did you suggest that he needs to resond to it?", '>>{reality-distortion} : His question is completely legitimate since that is the entire basis of mutually assured destruction, that each side is equally willing to deploy nuclear weapons. There are many things to attack Trump on, this is not one of them. He is both right and reasonable is asserting that we make these weapons because we will use them if necessary. Even Hillary Clinton has stated that she would use nuclear weapons against Iran if they nuked Israel.', ">>{reality-distortion} : Exactly. I'm certain the media would be calling him an idiot who doesn't understand deterrence if he had said he would not be willing to use them.", '>>{DrunkenGenie} : That is the point, he seems too willing to use them, even sounding like he may use them first. Clinton has stated she would use them to retaliate, Trump sounds like he wants to use them first.', '>>{moose_testes} : Who said I agree? I disagree. If he never made an ass of himself in front of intelligence officials then he should say so. Or if not him, then one of his senior campaign officials. No denial from anyone in the Trump camp. Just a response of "So what?" Utter stupidity.', ">>{throwaway029384756} : You: It would help if Trump had denied this, rather than stayed silent... Me: I don't think spending his time responding to idiotic allegations would in any possible way be a positive for him You: You should let him know. Me: I'm sure his staff have shared that with him already. If you agree, why did you suggest that he needs to resond to it? You: Something, something, make silly Trump bashing comment, something, something.", '>>{reality-distortion} : If you watch the video, he specifies that he is talking about a situation where someone has hit us with a nuke.', '>>{moose_testes} : I said you should let him know how you feel. Because he would appear not to know. How does that imply that I agree with you? More middle school support for Trump. Sad.', '>>{throwaway029384756} : >I said you should let him know how you feel. No. No you didn\'t, you said "You should let him know". Context is everything. Saying you\'re saying things you flat out didn\'t say really it makes it hard to have a discussion with you.', '>>{moose_testes} : Bahahahaha! "You never said \'how you feel\'! Fallacy! No goal Scotspost!" Children should be seen, not heard.', '>>{two_boxes_of_rocks} : says the /r/the_donald poster lmbo your guy is fucking demented', ">>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : What you just said isn't an argument at all.", '>>{GrandKhan} : When Rubot claimed he had small hands why did Trump go on national TV and assure us all his hands were normal and his package was adequate?', '>>{hookeslaw} : As fast as anonymous sources go, how could it be more legit? Or were you saying that nothing should be reported unless the person giving the information is willing to put their name as the source?', '>>{DrunkenGenie} : No, he says someone that hits us, he doesn’t specify how.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{gin_and_sunshine} : Trump asks, "if we have nukes, why can\'t we use them?"', ">>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : I'm still waiting on a reliable source that isn't from MSNBC to show up and say this.", '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : >Mr Trump had asked a foreign-policy expert "why can\'t we use" nuclear weapons, according to MSNBC host Joe Scarborough, who said he spoke to the expert. So an anonymous source claimed that Trump asked that question and now Joe Scarborough on MSNBC (who spoke to that anonymous source) is reporting on it? Sounds legit.', ">>{Christiano_Donaldo} : of course we're willing to use nukes. saying anything less than that would be irresponsible in the age of MAD.", '>>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : Exactly. This story is just a massive hit piece with no facts.', '>>{moose_testes} : It would help if Trump had denied this, rather than stayed silent and allowed his team to put out a tacit admission through their question of why this is a bad question.', ">>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : Idk, a lot of those are more than just coincidence. Too bad that isn't a form of the Mainstream media. Still not sure how this has anything to do with what we are taking about.", '>>{GoblinDiplomat} : Has anyone in the media directly asked him or his campaign yet? Seems like this story is a pretty big deal.', '>>{DrunkenGenie} : You can look up his town hall where he asked the same thing.', ">>{throwaway029384756} : I don't think spending his time responding to idiotic allegations would in any possible way be a positive for him. Should he deny that he has small hands everytime it's mentioned?", ">>{RealDonaldTrump__} : I think I raise a very good point. Incompetent Obama and Crooked H have been fighting ISIS with what, like slingshots and catapults or something? I don't know. It's like they're losing to terrorists on purpose. Very low energy. When I'm in there we don't lose ok? You can mark it down, take it to the bank, sign it seal it deliver it, we don't lose to ISIS when I'm in there. If it takes one or two of these bombs okay that's what it takes. Obama is so weak on this stuff it's, you can't even believe how weak he is. I know how to fight ISIS and I think we'll be very successful, very successful in ISIS.", '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : I\'m not talking about anything at a town hall, I\'m talking about this claim in the article: >"I\'ll be very careful here. Several months ago, a foreign policy expert, on the international level, went to advise Donald Trump, and three times he asked about the use of nuclear weapons," Scarborough said on his program Morning Joe. >"Three times he asked. At one point, \'If we have them, why can\'t we use them?\'" Scarborough continued.', '>>{DrunkenGenie} : So you are saying that he would ask it at a town hall but never in private to a foreign policy expert?', ">>{DOG_BUTT_JESUS} : Dude's a fighter. Just ask Dana White. Some people have said he's the best fighter. I think we should all remember that he is also a Purple Heart recipient. The man knows his stuff!", ">>{RealDonaldTrump__} : Thank you for the kind words, /u/DOG_BUTT_JESUS . Most people agree I'm one of the best fighters, if not the best. Not everyone thinks so, I guess Obama isn't a huge fan [pauses for laughter] he's not a huge fan ok but he doesn't have a Purple Heart. More of a black heart, am I right? You know I'm right, ok.", '>>{Louisthefuckenlawyer} : Well he does. So he could make time for nukes.', ">>{Peter_Sparker_} : But this thread is talking about reliable sources? I'm lost. How was that link relevant again?", ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : There's a significant difference between saying it at a town hall and repeatedly asking a foreign policy expert about it. That being said, if you link me to the town hall where he asks this, I'll check it out. I know nothing of the context or way he said it, so I can't comment much more specifically without seeing it.", ">>{moose_testes} : >I don't think spending his time responding to idiotic allegations would in any possible way be a positive for him. You should let him know.", ">>{DrunkenGenie} : http://www.msnbc.com/hardball/watch/donald-trump-won-t-take-nukes-off-the-table-655471171934 And I'll point out he asks why do we make them if we aren't going to use them. Not asking why he can't use them. I'm not sure one is better than the other.", ">>{keepitwithmine} : Seems like a legit question. They are expensive to build and maintain. Maybe if we aren't planning on using all 6-8k or whatever we have we should decommission a few.", ">>{throwaway029384756} : I'm sure his staff have shared that with him already. If you agree, why did you suggest that he needs to resond to it?", '>>{reality-distortion} : His question is completely legitimate since that is the entire basis of mutually assured destruction, that each side is equally willing to deploy nuclear weapons. There are many things to attack Trump on, this is not one of them. He is both right and reasonable is asserting that we make these weapons because we will use them if necessary. Even Hillary Clinton has stated that she would use nuclear weapons against Iran if they nuked Israel.', ">>{reality-distortion} : Exactly. I'm certain the media would be calling him an idiot who doesn't understand deterrence if he had said he would not be willing to use them.", '>>{DrunkenGenie} : That is the point, he seems too willing to use them, even sounding like he may use them first. Clinton has stated she would use them to retaliate, Trump sounds like he wants to use them first.', '>>{moose_testes} : Who said I agree? I disagree. If he never made an ass of himself in front of intelligence officials then he should say so. Or if not him, then one of his senior campaign officials. No denial from anyone in the Trump camp. Just a response of "So what?" Utter stupidity.', ">>{throwaway029384756} : You: It would help if Trump had denied this, rather than stayed silent... Me: I don't think spending his time responding to idiotic allegations would in any possible way be a positive for him You: You should let him know. Me: I'm sure his staff have shared that with him already. If you agree, why did you suggest that he needs to resond to it? You: Something, something, make silly Trump bashing comment, something, something.", '>>{reality-distortion} : If you watch the video, he specifies that he is talking about a situation where someone has hit us with a nuke.', '>>{moose_testes} : I said you should let him know how you feel. Because he would appear not to know. How does that imply that I agree with you? More middle school support for Trump. Sad.', '>>{throwaway029384756} : >I said you should let him know how you feel. No. No you didn\'t, you said "You should let him know". Context is everything. Saying you\'re saying things you flat out didn\'t say really it makes it hard to have a discussion with you.', '>>{moose_testes} : Bahahahaha! "You never said \'how you feel\'! Fallacy! No goal Scotspost!" Children should be seen, not heard.', '>>{two_boxes_of_rocks} : says the /r/the_donald poster lmbo your guy is fucking demented', ">>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : What you just said isn't an argument at all.", '>>{GrandKhan} : When Rubot claimed he had small hands why did Trump go on national TV and assure us all his hands were normal and his package was adequate?', '>>{hookeslaw} : As fast as anonymous sources go, how could it be more legit? Or were you saying that nothing should be reported unless the person giving the information is willing to put their name as the source?', '>>{DrunkenGenie} : No, he says someone that hits us, he doesn’t specify how.']]

classify and reply

['>>{rwilso7} : You have to read a few paragraphs but then, of course it comes : Flynn is a crackpot because " he believes Islam is a malignant cancer." Anyone who doubts that is a crackpot.', ">>{blatherskiter} : The most terrifying literally Hitler appointment since the last terrifying literally Hitler appointment you've already forgotten about. I'm so glad to have WaPo journalists to tell me how ignorant a 30-year special forces officer is about Islamic terrorism.", ">>{roboboogienights} : >“Some also described him as a Captain Queeg-like character, paranoid that his staff members were undercutting him and credulous of conspiracy theories.” Wow, those two are two peas in a pod, aren't they? paranoid autocrats attract paranoid autocrats? >But Flynn himself has used social media to promote a series of outrageous conspiracy theories about Hillary Clinton, President Barack Obama and their inner circles in recent months Well, yeah, what good would an *honest* security advisor be? (Could be Trump doesn't understand the story of the Emperor's new clothes...)", '>>{eaglesbaby200} : So let\'s go over SOME of Trump\'s other cabinet nominations.I am so deeply troubled for the future of my country, and I\'m absolutely powerless to stop it from proceeding full steam ahead. Years of progress are being undone and it seems that no one can do a thing about it. 1) Jeff Sessions for Attorney General (Republican Senator, Alabama): comments include "good people don\'t smoke marijuana". Also blocked an LGBT rights group from having a conference on University of Alabama\'s campus. 2) Ben Carson for Secretary of Housing: Carson is a retired neurosurgeon with absolutely NO political qualifications, let alone a background in public service and urban development. 3) Top choice for Secretary of State is Rex Tillerson, the CEO OF EXXONMOBIL! Need I remind you that one of the nation\'s biggest gripes with Hillary Clinton is that she was in the pocket of gas and oil moguls 4) Don\'t even get me started on Vice President Mike Pence, who signed a bill into law in Indiana protecting businesses who wanted to deny service to the LGBT community. 5) Secretary of Education - Betsy DaVos: She literally wants to take funding OUT of the public school system AND wants to integrate Christian teaching into the classroom. Also, she is the sister of the founder of Blackwater. 6) Secretary of Treasury - Steve Munching. He is a partner of Goldman Sachs. So much for draining the swamp and separating Wall Street from the White House. 7) Just to add to the outrageous cabinet choices: The head of fast food chains, Hardee\'s and Carl\'s Jr, is in consideration for Secretary of Labor.', ">>{FalstaffsMind} : What about his credulous retweeting that Clinton and Podesta were involved in a Satanic cult and were running a child sex slavery ring out of a Washington pizza parlor? He's General Jack Ripper from Dr. Strangelove.", ">>{OrionBell} : He has to sit still for that coif every day. He has to wear a tie around his fat neck too. It can't be comfortable, dressing like that.", '>>{scorpion_1962} : “Mr. Flynn said that the first thing everyone needed to know was that he was always right. His staff would know they were right, he said, when their views melded to his.”', '>>{-14k-} : This thread is being overrun by Trump apologists, but a word to the wise - reading this article will ruin your day.', '>>{poopy_mcgee} : What about his own staff, his boss, and the President, all who thought the same thing?', '>>{blatherskiter} : I would definitely trust Flynn over Obama on Islamic terrorism. That should go without saying.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{rwilso7} : You have to read a few paragraphs but then, of course it comes : Flynn is a crackpot because " he believes Islam is a malignant cancer." Anyone who doubts that is a crackpot.', ">>{blatherskiter} : The most terrifying literally Hitler appointment since the last terrifying literally Hitler appointment you've already forgotten about. I'm so glad to have WaPo journalists to tell me how ignorant a 30-year special forces officer is about Islamic terrorism.", ">>{roboboogienights} : >“Some also described him as a Captain Queeg-like character, paranoid that his staff members were undercutting him and credulous of conspiracy theories.” Wow, those two are two peas in a pod, aren't they? paranoid autocrats attract paranoid autocrats? >But Flynn himself has used social media to promote a series of outrageous conspiracy theories about Hillary Clinton, President Barack Obama and their inner circles in recent months Well, yeah, what good would an *honest* security advisor be? (Could be Trump doesn't understand the story of the Emperor's new clothes...)", '>>{eaglesbaby200} : So let\'s go over SOME of Trump\'s other cabinet nominations.I am so deeply troubled for the future of my country, and I\'m absolutely powerless to stop it from proceeding full steam ahead. Years of progress are being undone and it seems that no one can do a thing about it. 1) Jeff Sessions for Attorney General (Republican Senator, Alabama): comments include "good people don\'t smoke marijuana". Also blocked an LGBT rights group from having a conference on University of Alabama\'s campus. 2) Ben Carson for Secretary of Housing: Carson is a retired neurosurgeon with absolutely NO political qualifications, let alone a background in public service and urban development. 3) Top choice for Secretary of State is Rex Tillerson, the CEO OF EXXONMOBIL! Need I remind you that one of the nation\'s biggest gripes with Hillary Clinton is that she was in the pocket of gas and oil moguls 4) Don\'t even get me started on Vice President Mike Pence, who signed a bill into law in Indiana protecting businesses who wanted to deny service to the LGBT community. 5) Secretary of Education - Betsy DaVos: She literally wants to take funding OUT of the public school system AND wants to integrate Christian teaching into the classroom. Also, she is the sister of the founder of Blackwater. 6) Secretary of Treasury - Steve Munching. He is a partner of Goldman Sachs. So much for draining the swamp and separating Wall Street from the White House. 7) Just to add to the outrageous cabinet choices: The head of fast food chains, Hardee\'s and Carl\'s Jr, is in consideration for Secretary of Labor.', ">>{FalstaffsMind} : What about his credulous retweeting that Clinton and Podesta were involved in a Satanic cult and were running a child sex slavery ring out of a Washington pizza parlor? He's General Jack Ripper from Dr. Strangelove.", ">>{OrionBell} : He has to sit still for that coif every day. He has to wear a tie around his fat neck too. It can't be comfortable, dressing like that.", '>>{scorpion_1962} : “Mr. Flynn said that the first thing everyone needed to know was that he was always right. His staff would know they were right, he said, when their views melded to his.”', '>>{-14k-} : This thread is being overrun by Trump apologists, but a word to the wise - reading this article will ruin your day.', '>>{poopy_mcgee} : What about his own staff, his boss, and the President, all who thought the same thing?', '>>{blatherskiter} : I would definitely trust Flynn over Obama on Islamic terrorism. That should go without saying.']]

classify and reply

['>>{coltsmetsfan614} : Donna Brazile Apparently Tipped The Clinton Campaign Off To A Town Hall Question', '>>{coltsmetsfan614} : >Donna Brazile, a former CNN contributor and Bill Clinton campaign adviser, apparently emailed a Hillary Clinton campaign staffer a question that was expected to be asked at the CNN Democratic presidential town hall debate in March. >In an email titled, “From time to time I get the questions in advance,” Brazile appeared to tip off Clinton communications director Jennifer Palmieri to a question about the candidate’s stance on the death penalty. >“Here’s one that worries me about HRC,” read the email sent by Brazile, who is currently serving as the acting chair of the Democratic National Committee. >>19 states and the District of Columbia have banned the death penalty. 31 states, including Ohio, still have the death penalty. According to the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, since 1973, 156 people have been on death row and later set free. Since 1976, 1,414 people have been executed in the U.S. That’s 11% of Americans who were sentenced to die, but later exonerated and freed. Should Ohio and the 30 other states join the current list and abolish the death penalty? >Palmieri responded by saying the question is “one she gets asked about. Not everyone likes her answer but can share it.” (Palmieri didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.)', ">>{tkarocker} : I still have mine on 9.3.2. Can't justify updating yet.", ">>{microsoftnotgreen} : So now the republicans are trying to distract from Russians meddiling in our elections by claiming a country is going that for the other side. How sad of hen. They're desperate.", '>>{WhatAnEpicTurtle} : Same. It just feels so fluid on iOS 9.', ">>{GregoryPanic} : Death penalty is not the highest on my priority list. This isn't about the perfect candidate, it's about a platform I can deal with and compromise with for now. Having public option back on the table, and overturning citizens united are the two largest things for me at this point. Honestly, overturning cit united should cause a significant amount of dominoes to fall and see many corrupt behaviors go away - like private prisons. She has this Bernie voter. Don't speak for me", ">>{jonginator} : As long as you don't mind the major security flaws", ">>{coltsmetsfan614} : I was a Bernie voter, and now I'm a Hillary voter. I'm justing posting any new stories I see.", '>>{Brad_tilf} : There will be an investigation of James Comey’s conduct. We might get some accountability, after all.', ">>{TheRunner_PD} : >Death penalty is not the highest on my priority list. This isn't about the perfect candidate, it's about a platform I can deal with and compromise with for now. Having public option back on the table, and overturning citizens united are the two largest things for me at this point. >Honestly, overturning cit united should cause a significant amount of dominoes to fall and see many corrupt behaviors go away - like private prisons. >She has this Bernie voter. Don't speak for me Err... I agree with you...", '>>{Brad_tilf} : My first thought on this is - Ok, great. Maybe there will be some accountability (or not) but so what? We already have Trump', '>>{TheTelephone} : Are HRC supporters now claiming that leaked e-mails are hoaxes created by Russia? Is this like Trump claiming that climate change is a Chinese hoax?', ">>{GregoryPanic} : Oh, I thought you meant Clinton isn't getting Bernie voters. Post was vague", ">>{blahblah24x} : The contents of the death penalty answer is not what this article is about. It's about another case of the DNC tipping the scales in Clinton's favor. It's about possible media collusion or at least either the media's disinterest or their ignorance in possibly supplying a certain candidate information before a debate. It's infuriating the lack of outcry from democrats because they feel the need to defend Hillary and her surrogates every step. The democratic primary was a sham election and undemocratic. If the lack of outcry continues the next democratic primary will in all likelihood be a sham election and undemocratic. And the one after that. If these actions are what they would do in their own party's election, it doesn't bode well for what actions they would be willing to take in a general election to win.", ">>{RajivFernanDatBribe} : > Are HRC supporters now claiming that leaked e-mails are hoaxes created by Russia? Yes. It's hilarious.", ">>{Fluidfox} : Some accountability would be nice.... but you can't un-ring that bell. This entire election should have been thrown out and re-done from scratch at this point. Other countries have done it for way less. http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/07/01/484300814/austrias-top-court-throws-out-presidential-election-result-orders-a-do-over", '>>{maxiperalta54} : I was using ios9 on my SE all the way until last week. I thought I would hate ios10 but I actually like it better.', ">>{RajivFernanDatBribe} : Hillary is both for and against the death penalty (and every other issue) depending on how much money you give her. What makes you think she cares about the platform even though she is on record as against all of Bernie's provisions?", '>>{DKSArtwork} : The Pentagon has sent ISIS options to the White House', '>>{CampaignVeteran} : Fear not, Trump will choose the worst one.', ">>{wraithtek} : Small comfort, but we'll probably get to watch Trump badmouth an investigation of Comey, claiming it's all about him (de-legitimizing his win).", ">>{stuball81} : I hope we finally do get some accountability. To say that Clinton was just too fucking stupid to realize that material was classified that she had on her private server is asinine. Too say that Loretta Lynch meeting with Bill Clinton in secret a week before the findings came out isn't suspect, at the least. Yeah, lets get some accountability on all sides.", ">>{Pumba001} : You're going to get hacked no matter what. Don't think just because you updated, that you are safe. Don't be a fool.", ">>{jonginator} : I didn't say that. You are objectively safer by being on a later iOS with security flaws patched. That's undeniable.", ">>{CuckStumperSupreme} : I agree with this, what the hell was going on with James Comey when he wouldn't indict career criminal Hillary Clinton? That matter needs to be investigated fully (and Hillary indicted).", ">>{SchwarzerKaffee} : Shouldn't Trump send the options to the Pentagon? After all, he knows more about ISIS than the generals. Believe him.", '>>{Erra0} : Incoming boots on the ground. Nothing distracts from scandal quite like the forced nationalism of ground combat operations.', ">>{Ulthanon} : May he die old and in utter disgrace. Of course, he'll be picked up by some consulting firm and get paid millions of dollars a year, conscience intact, but hey- I can dream.", ">>{olb3} : I mean, I hope you're right, but Donald Trump inspires absolutely no confidence.", '>>{Digit-Aria} : They previously claimed the paid speech transcripts made HRC "look good, if not better." Now they\'re fakes. Again.', ">>{FoChouteau} : Now's the time for Comey to release Trump's sex tape.", ">>{IphtashuFitz} : Trump is just testing the generals in the Pentagon to make sure they're smart enough to be working there. He'll look at their plan and compare it to his own super-secret plan to see if they match his ideas. It's 572-D parcheesi after all.", ">>{GregoryPanic} : She's been consistent on the death penalty. She thinks we need it, but to only use it in the most stringent of cases. I believe she also wants to reduce the state's ability to use it and leave it to federal - which I'm OK with because at least then it's use would be consistent. I still think it ultimately needs to go. Because Bernie and his supporters will hold her accountable. Hate to say it, but don't make the good the enemy of the perfect. Everyone knows Bernie wasn't going to be the Savior, but looking what he did to the election - a huge part has become about citizens united. It's apparent to me she has changed on a number of issues and moved left in areas. I'm good with that for now. It's most important to start filling the house and Senate and local government with progressive voices. In the meantime, I'm with her.", '>>{FirstDimensionFilms} : Our military is still the best in the world. Our generals will have more of an affect than Trump will.', '>>{A_TEMPORAL_TOURIST} : Mr. President, I have here five unspeakable acts to resolve the.... I pick number three!', '>>{A_TEMPORAL_TOURIST} : Nah. They need a unifying terrorist attack on American soil destroying a landmark snd killing at least 3k people.', '>>{Entertainnosis} : Not an SE but a 5S on iOS 9, after experiencing iOS 10 on a previous 5S I obtained another on iOS 9 which had been a much more pleasurable phone to use.', '>>{CurryGettinSpicy} : I was on iOS 9 for the longest time and just went to 10 and I gotta say it really damn good. I feel like the phone somehow got faster and my battery last a little longer now too. Although I really only switched for the stickers and iMessage effects lol.', '>>{chest_rockwell_21} : On one hand, I see the point of this. On the other hand, I shudder to think about the optics of this and how Trump supporters will latch on to this to spin a specific narrative, despite the fact this is coming from the IG.', '>>{A_TEMPORAL_TOURIST} : I will have the yuuuuuuge oil tanker and giant hose ready', ">>{itsmegeorge} : It's fluid on iOS 10 too. No SE user has any problem with it", ">>{RajivFernanDatBribe} : > moved left in areas. I'll believe it when I see it. >I'm with her. I wish she were with us instead.", '>>{Pumba001} : People love to live in a box of lies.', ">>{Seinfeldologist} : We need to investigate that again? How about an investigation of Trump's (and his teams) ties to Russia. Seems a little more prudent at the moment, wouldn't you agree?", ">>{TheTeenageOldman} : Why would they need to collude with anyone to win a general election? Trump's already making the case as to why people should vote for HRC, and likely or a Trump-backed proxy will be back in 4 years to split the party once again.", '>>{Brad_tilf} : And the ties between Trump and Putin/Russia could constitute an unheard of compromise of the POTUS that simply cannot be allowed to happen', '>>{Brad_tilf} : No. Even the POTUS is accountable to someone. He could do that no more than Tricky Dick could call of the Watergate investigation', '>>{QuixoticMcGee} : The day before a town hall with a question about the death penalty, Brazile sent an email with the subject: "From time to time I get the questions in advance" with a death penalty question.', ">>{QuiteSomeBiscuit} : > I never thought I'd see the day where an anti ISIS comment was downvoted so heavily. I think it's more the simple-minded tone of the post than the anti-ISIS sentiment.", ">>{internetmaster5000} : During his sworn testimony to Congress in July when he was being questioned by Jim Sensenbrenner, Comey said he would update Congress with any new developments on the Clinton email investigation. He never closed the investigation, it became inactive. Then, when it was discovered that not all devices had been turned over to the FBI which contained emails from the Clinton server, Comey amended his previous testimony to Congress saying the investigation had been reactivated.   It might not make the users of r/politics happy, but there really isn't a case here.   I will also refer to the 1992 case when independent council for the Iran Contra investigation Lawrence Walsh indicted former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger (who had served with George HW Bush in the Reagan administration) on perjury charges four days before the 1992 Presidential election. Those charges were dropped two months later. It would be a lot easier to take the Clinton's outrage about Comey seriously if they hadn't been so ebullient in their defense of Walsh's decision in 1992.", '>>{FirstDimensionFilms} : Ya but if I said "Fuck Trump" it would be +25.', ">>{olb3} : Just remember that for every bomb we drop in the middle of the desert 6,000 miles away, we could've built a school or a hospital, housed homeless veterans, or sponsored research. Also, remember that there is a strong chance that we end up creating the next generation of terrorists -- our track record in the middle east is not good...", ">>{chest_rockwell_21} : Oh I'm aware. Just figured I'd take the bait for the hell of it to pose the question. Sometimes, you treat these people who are clearly trying to troll like grown ups, and they literally do not know how to react.", ">>{sprucetrap87} : He wouldn't be calling off an investigation on himself though. Why couldn't he just pardon Comey?", '>>{GregoryPanic} : Don\'t get me wrong, the DNC needs an overhaul. I was furious during the primary, I am still a Bernie Bro. But it\'s too damn late now, and I\'m not having Trump or "What\'s Aleppo" Johnson in charge of my brothers and sisters in the military. I don\'t think the outcry for change at the DNC is going away, I certainly won\'t let it. But right now we\'ve got 29 days til go time. Suck it the fuck up and start campaigning for people supporting change in the house and local governments, that\'s how well see it fixed.', '>>{Bobbydeerwood} : I am a lifelong Hillary and DNC supporter, but this is crazy and this is not a Hillary issue, but a DNC issue. These leaks have been verified and that Brazile was helping to undermine the Sanders campaign and is now the head of DNC feels very undemocratic. I want Hillary to win fair and square like she would have, not win with a cloud of suspicion. "Interim chair of the Democratic National Committee Donna Brazile said she would impose tougher standards on staff going forward after email leaks showed some party leaders plotted to undermine the insurgent campaign of Sen. Bernie Sanders."', '>>{JacobCrim88} : Donald knows more than the generals though. ^^^/s', ">>{RyanClinton2017} : If you had said simply fuck ISIS you probably would have gotten +25 as well. It's like saying fuck Donald the daughter fucker Trump, what you did instead.", ">>{Seinfeldologist} : In all honesty, there's a solid chance Congress doesn't do a damn thing. We could go four years with Putin having some level of control or sway over US policy and not know a thing.", ">>{StairheidCritic} : It will consist of his revolutionary 'plan' that no one in the history of warfare has ever thought of before; the unannounced attack.", '>>{AmericaGreat} : This is from March, and both sides got the question in advance', ">>{blahblah24x} : Firstly it sets a standard, it's not just about this general but all general elections, brings questions to the validity of previous elections and the validity of future ones. And secondly there could have been possible collusion or other undemocratic action taken behind closed doors this general to get to where we are, the point is the suspicion is there now that we know a little more about what the democratic establishment is capable of doing when they run their own primary elections.", '>>{arthurpaliden} : And none of then will have a real exit strategy that is designed to prevent the creation of ISIS II in the power vacuum once ISIS is dead and the US military leaves.', '>>{KirkBuckrogers} : His executive order to the joint chiefs ordered them to make a plan to deal with ISIS in 30 days. Trump will ask congress for War powers. Phase one: Restrict travel to all target countries. Phase two: Ask congress for war powers. Phase three: War Phase four: Take the oil. Reason? Control of world oil markets.', '>>{FL_Paratrooper} : > Wow I had no idea how many redditors support ISIS No… It’s the childish ‘rah rah Murica’ way you said it! And not to say it isn’t grotesque; but there are plenty of people who screw goats that aren’t ISIS affiliated, just lonely farm hands. I grew out of that epithet when I got out of my teens in the Army.', ">>{Brad_tilf} : He can only pardon someone after they've been convicted of something. If he were impeached based on Comey's testimony then he wouldn't be in a position to do anything and Comey might just walk away without a government job", '>>{coltsmetsfan614} : The story is from now though. And how do you know both sides got the question?', '>>{allnose} : >Phase four: Take the oil. I think it\'s worth noting that, aside from being politically unpalatable, and also a war crime, this really isn\'t a solution that\'s physically possible. It\'s not like Iraq just has all their oil stored in giant tanks that the US military could have taken on their way out. "Taking the oil" would basically mean setting up an Iraq-based oil company.', '>>{Brad_tilf} : Hopefully there is a reporter, or reporters, out there who are willing to do the real work and find the truth and expose it', '>>{KirkBuckrogers} : Rex Tillerson has ample experience in "setting up" oil companies and negotiating oil contracts.', ">>{FirstDimensionFilms} : It's just an insult. You're looking way too far into it.", ">>{blahblah24x} : I vehemently disagree. Supporting and electing the candidate who became the candidate partly because of undemocratic actions is not the best way to see it fixed. It's the best way to see it continued. You don't get to have more leeway to upend our democracy based on how good of a candidate you are compared to the others, you set the same standards across the board. Otherwise our system of government begins to falter as more and more candidates see how far they can go bending and breaking the rules in place. The best way to see this fixed is nip it in the bud right when we see it, have no tolerance to undemocratic actions.", '>>{allnose} : Does he have experience defending oil facilities from a country unhappy that its natural resources are being plundered? We\'re not "taking the oil."', '>>{KirkBuckrogers} : Defending oil facilities will be the ONLY priority for THE MILITARY under the Tweeter In Chief. "You think our Country\'s so innocent?" Trump cares little for what other countries say. He can declare his target Muslim countries as terrorist nations then blame the entire mess on President Obama.', '>>{radicalelation} : Shit, having business dealings with or even just knowing a handful of Russians is a security risk and can hurt your chances getting a standard DoD job.', ">>{DeadRedRussian} : He let's your girl off the hook twice and this is how he's repaid?", '>>{TheTeenageOldman} : Does it only call into question elections that Democrats won?', ">>{GregoryPanic} : The alternative is putting horrifically unqualified people in charge of the military. Can't do that, as a vet I have a responsibility to those who went before me and those who go after me to vote in the person who will not misuse their lives. There is absolutely no candidate other than Clinton for that job. Johnson and Trump would be a fucking disaster in a world where were quickly approaching a second cold war. Great, you see a gaping hole in the wall. Don't tear down the wall and rebuild it, patch it up. A fuck load of people died building the wall in the first place, patching it up over the years.", '>>{blahblah24x} : No of course not. I imagine undemocratic acts are only more likely to make a candidate win, not guarantee them to win. So no reason to think they could have engaged in them and still end up losing. At the very least, it calls into question the validity of all elections that the DNC played a part in while either Debbie Wasserman Schultz or Donna Brazile were a part of the DNC.', ">>{Scheisser_Soze} : We'll go in. ^At ^night.", ">>{blahblah24x} : That's all subjective though. One could say Clinton ramping up tensions against Russia would more likely put our military in danger. One could say the absolute lack of support Trump has is less likely to see him have any support in starting any wars. One could say Johnson's non-interventionist or isolationist views would more likely make sure not to see our military engage in unnecessary combat. None of that are absolute truths. The absolute truth is that a high ranking member of the DNC undemocratically helped get a candidate nominated. And that candidate is running for president now. Knowing this we can either elect her or not, and that's the decision we face. Hillary is part of the gaping hole in the wall. Patching it means getting rid of that gaping hold in the wall.", ">>{ShroudedSciuridae} : Yeah, provided the investigation only takes a week. Trump & Friends won't allow this to be carried to full term", ">>{Foxhound199} : The timing makes for a strange coincidence. And maybe that's all it is. That's what the investigation is for. If there's anything to suggest he sat on his decision to notify congress, however, he could be in deep doo-doo.", '>>{Seinfeldologist} : Still need Congress to take the next step. I have no faith at the moment.', '>>{corncobbdouglas2} : A lot of this may also feed Republicans looking to challenge him in 2020 - if Trump is still running again.', ">>{allnose} : I don't like Trump any more than you do, but for God's sake, live in the real world.", '>>{KirkBuckrogers} : Trump said today that there will be the largest increase in defense spending in a generation. Open your eyes. He is going to ask for war powers and Republicans will give a weak President the power he needs.', '>>{floridalegend} : Do over is the least this country can do to reclaim some dignity.', '>>{corncobbdouglas2} : Ford pardoned Nixon even though no charges were yet filed.', ">>{allnose} : We're not taking the oil. That's all I'm saying to you. I don't think he's going to ask for war powers either, but that's mainly just because I don't think he's going to need them for whatever he wants to do", ">>{Brad_tilf} : I see your point. So, I suppose a pre-emptive pardon is possible but if these charges prove out to be true, it won't save his sorry ass", ">>{sprucetrap87} : I'm confused how Trump would be impeached for Comey's behavior while Obama was in office. Do you believe Trump colluded with Comey to release the letter about Hillary's e-mails?", '>>{KirkBuckrogers} : Trump said "We will take the Oil." He also said we will build a wall, ban Muslims, repeal and replace the ACA. Why should we as Americans, believe contrary to what Trump himself has said the Red Hat Republicans will accomplish?', '>>{allnose} : Because building a wall is expensive and requires Congressional approval (which hasn\'t yet been given), but it\'s popular with half the country. Banning Muslims is popular with half the country, and can be completed solely through executive powers (maybe). Repealing the ACA was a major campaign plank for Trump and pretty much every congressional Republican. Less than half the country wants it, but if they don\'t support the repeal, they\'re losing their fanatical base. "Taking the oil" isn\'t like those. Not even Trump\'s base wants to start another war, making "taking the oil politically unpalatable, gives solid grounds for impeachment (war crimes are solidly within "High Crimes and Misdemeanors"), which would happen if *not* impeaching Trump would lead to losing Congressional seats, and, on top of that, is nearly impossible, logistically.', '>>{KirkBuckrogers} : Research "Presidential War Powers" Trump has the votes in congress. If given war powers, the President has exponentially more power to make decisions without congress based on "Law and Order" Your assumptions all factor in a check and balance to the Presidents power that will NOT be in place if given war powers. The fate of the 2018 elections is up in the air and Republicans believe they have a mandate that will keep them in power without fear of removal. They can speak out , but the real voice is how they vote. It\'s the Red Hats who set the table for disaster. Republicans tie their fate to Trump.', '>>{ctolsen} : FBI said they found no criminal wrongdoing, and so did a host of other investigations including Senate Republicans. What the hell are you on about?', '>>{trollking66} : Nixon showed the dignity to resign- trump will never under any circumstance resign.', ">>{Brad_tilf} : I don't think Trump can be impeached for Comey's behavior. I think Trump will be impeached for being a traitor (and hopefully locked up). I think he colluded with the Russians and they have enough shit on him to seriously compromise him. I think Comey will pay for fucking with the election", '>>{poiu477} : Which is why bush was impeached for war crimes lol keep dreamin pal', ">>{FartMartin} : An investigation may backfire on those promoting it. It's possible, perhaps even likely declining to file criminal charges against her will be deemed negligence. Sometimes it's better to let sleeping dogs lie lest they bite you in the ass.", '>>{Checkma7e} : Accountability? For correcting his sworn testimony before Congress? Lol', '>>{sleazus_christ} : and to make sure it is unannounced - since his administration leaks like a sieve - it will have to be executed the same day it is presented...no time to weigh pluses and minuses. YOLO-warfare!', ">>{sprucetrap87} : So you believe Trump will be impeached before an investigation of Comey concludes, the investigation will conclude that Comey did something illegal and Pence won't pardon Comey? I find those increasingly unlikely.", ">>{VROF} : When a majority of the voters listen to the Republican party promise to do things that will harm millions of people; and still vote for them we are totally fucked. Everyone is so afraid of Trump. We should be terrified of what Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell are going to do to us. And they have been promising to do it for years so it shouldn't be a surprise", '>>{VROF} : It would be nice to investigate the FBI and stop with the political witch hunts. If it is true that those agents read that idiotic book Clinton Cash and based inquiries on that then we should demand better from our federal agents.', '>>{VROF} : I agree that the outrage should be directed at Jason Chaffetz who released the information right after he re-endorsed Trump for president. But there are many legal scholars who feel this is a violation of the Hatch Act. There is also some question over whether or not the investigation should have been "reopened" especially when the answer was almost immediately "nope."', ">>{DeadRedRussian} : Shows how judgemental you are. I'm actually Irish-American.", ">>{GearBrain} : Either we do a new emergency election or we impeach the Human Dumpster Fire and work our way down the chain of succession until we find someone who won't spend the next four years fucking the country's asshole inside out.", ">>{Fluidfox} : Everybody lost this one, Gary. There's just a percentage of people that don't realize it yet.", ">>{ophelia_jones} : Country over party. I get that this is going to sound really naive, and I say it knowing that the likelihood that anything will stop this administration is smaller than a mouse fart, but it isn't even about dignity, it's just about doing the right thing. Things are only set in stone or unchangeable if people who have the ability to influence change do nothing out of despair or selfishness or fear.", '>>{chest_rockwell_21} : I\'m not saying I\'d base the decision on whether to go for it based on optics, so I definitely want to be clear that\'s not what I meant, and you\'re 100% right; however, I\'m just reflecting on how every single thing that involves the Presidential Candidates turns into trashy fodder for people to use as \'ammo\' against the other \'side\'. This was done by the IG, from what I understand they are pretty much non-partisan, so I know it wasn\'t done for optics. Just lamenting the fact that it will be used as ammo for a "GET OVER IT HE WON" response from people who are "PRO-TRUMP" cause he "tells it like it is" and "isn\'t PC".', '>>{GaryRuppert} : Keep telling yourself that. America just avoided the mistake of a Hillary Presidency', ">>{DX3906} : You're not far off, you just got confused by the fact that a pardon requires an *admission* of guilt, not a conviction.", '>>{veniceinperil} : Not trolling: What do you think a Hillary Presidency would have done?', ">>{Tschmelz} : Wow. You're definitely in for a shock when Trump tries to go full tyrant. The question is whether or not he succeeds.", '>>{Zifnab25} : I can name at least one person who is totally still winning.', '>>{GaryRuppert} : Admitted millions of migrants that would upend American life while governing through executive order and undermining representative democracy Along with radical anti-male policies in the name of some form of feminism', '>>{veniceinperil} : What kind of radical anti-male policies? (Again, not trolling.)', '>>{JesusHRChrist} : Same shit that we had for the last 16 years', '>>{pb2crazy} : If Comey gets reprimanded and fired, Trump will just replace him with someone even worse. So lol.', ">>{CuckStumperSupreme} : The Obama administration protected Hillary, there hasn't been a proper investigation yet with an attorney general willing to follow the law.", ">>{RiverSnake412} : For the IG to prosecute Comey, would they have to prove his *intent*? Because that'd be ironic.", '>>{ElliottWaits} : In terms of foreign policy and corporate welfare, yeah probably, but Trump may very well plunge us into much worse than what we had for the last 16 years.', '>>{GaryRuppert} : Unlimited abortion, sex-selection abortion, policies that would discriminate against males and favor females', ">>{bdog2g2} : Go through this guys post history then ask yourself if you think you'll get an honest, intelligent response.", '>>{veniceinperil} : O.k., maybe not. Thanks for the heads up.', ">>{thats_bone} : I put this loss down to 3 things: * Comey's meddling * Anthony Weiner enabling Comey's meddling * The Right using accusations of Spirit Cooking and occult practices to scare religious people of color. If those 3 things hadn't happened, we would be enjoying the first female President, who would be fighting for equality for all, not just Trump's billionaire friends.", '>>{bdog2g2} : The time I saved you should be enough to backup the porns Sessions is going to take from you.', '>>{ElliottWaits} : You really think women are out there getting abortions based on the sex of the fetus?', ">>{S7usek} : I can't tell if you're insane or criminally stupid. I'm no fan of Hillary, deeply opposed her for president, but if you think THOSE were the threats that she posed there is something seriously wrong with your ability to use logic and reason.", ">>{thecooldude20} : More silent wars like all the countries Obama is bombing, toppling of Assad and an ISIS takeover of Syria, confrontation with Russia over her proposed noflyzone, total sellout to the banks who funded her campaign, cronyism reaching levels only Hillary's touch of corruption could bring, 500+ thousand Muslim refugees bringing their views on women and gays here and producing some terrorists while they are at it (Context: I have a Muslim relative who came as a refugee to America 2 years ago, and he freaked out and cried in anger cause he found that someone had put a picture showing his mothers face on their facebook account), an amnesty bill for millions of illegals and if the repubs wouldn't pass it through congress then the current clusterfuck of a situation with a weak border, more globalism with the passing of the TPP killing more jobs than NAFTA did, the continuing growth and festering of toxic SJW ideology throughout the country. And those were just off top of my head.", '>>{Zifnab25} : Republicans shoved a thousand copies of "Clinton Cash" into an already-deeply-suspicious FBI and convinced a sufficient number of career professionals that Hillary was guilty of something. And they weren\'t alone. I can\'t count the number of times I saw "Clinton Cash" cited, referenced, or linked to on Reddit. Lots of people were suckered by GOP propaganda. I can\'t count the number of times I saw people claim Hillary stole the election. Or that she was a tool of the fossil fuel industry. Or that she hated black people, because she was friends with W. Virginia Senator Robert Byrd. Or that she raped kids in a DC pizzeria. It would have been sweet to see Hillary win, despite all the bullshit. But ringing Comey out to dry isn\'t going to prevent Republicans from flooding the next election cycle with another round of "Democrats are corrupt! Their charities are just fronts for ISIS!" lies Hillary got hit with.', ">>{LucienLibrarian} : In favor of a Russian puppet who is openly embracing 3rd world levels of kleptocracy with his family? I dont like Hillary either, but c'mon.", '>>{corncobbdouglas2} : I would actually think Trump is unlikely to want to fight should he start slipping into impeachment territory. He is under the impression that regardless of how shamefully he acts, if he spins it as a win, its a win.', ">>{veniceinperil} : And you'd rather gut Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, withdraw from the Paris Accords, do nothing about global warming, torture people with life-begins-at-conception laws, let Putin run Trump as a puppet, take away public education in favor of religious schools, and let Goldman Sachs run all the banks?", '>>{LucienLibrarian} : He wants to allow the torture of suspects, murder the families of criminals, create religious tests, etc. No friend of Putin is a friend of mine.', ">>{corncobbdouglas2} : I actually don't care about Comey. I still think he probably acted poorly, but not in an intentionally negligent way.", ">>{stvenkman420} : Liberals are now the crazy ones. Blaming the fact their corrupt queen lost on the FBI director that was just doing his job. I guess all those emails you guys don't want to talk about played no factor in her defeat, huh? Lol", ">>{Freckled_daywalker} : Sure there has. The investigation was months long and was incredibly thorough. What exactly do you think they missed? Comey explained the law and why he came to his conclusion. He's no fan of Hillary and had complete control of his recommendation. Just because you *feel* like she's a criminal doesn't mean there's an actual criminal case against her. Edit: took out a claim I can't source.", '>>{stvenkman420} : So the emails played no factor? Great analysis!', ">>{GaryRuppert} : It's gonna become more common in the future if action isn't taken", '>>{stvenkman420} : Lol, you sound kind of bitter. Maybe a little sore?', '>>{Freckled_daywalker} : Under what theory of law would excercising prosecutorial discretion constitute negligence?', '>>{stvenkman420} : Maybe there were nuggets of truth in that book.', ">>{stvenkman420} : Lol, crazy liberals talking about how Trump's a traitor. The left has gone full cray!", '>>{Brad_tilf} : And I suppose colluding with the Russians (if it is proven) would be something other than traitorous?', ">>{trollking66} : Right on, I just don't think his arrogance of self would allow it, I suspect he would not believe he could lose, and he would claim a rigged system if he did.", '>>{CuckStumperSupreme} : The investigation was an operation designed to give immunity to all witnesses and to gather and destroy all evidence. James Comey has connections to the Clintons through the Clinton Foundation, and we all know that the Attorney General met with Bill Clinton before the opinion was released. Congress is still investigating Hillary currently, and as Trump said, there needs to be an investigation of the investigation.', ">>{thecooldude20} : >Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare I care about the first three you mentioned, and Trump has said that he will do whatever he can to keep them the way they are, while looking to solving our debt problem. Even if he ends up cutting 10-20% of those programs, it wouldn't outweigh his other policies that I like, or erase the disaster that would be a Hillary presidency. And btw, Trump will be re elected cause the guy is a strategic mastermind, and gutting those programs would mean an automatic loss. Don't count on him gutting them. > do nothing about global warming Trump said in the New York Times interview shortly after the election that he will carefully weigh the economic pros and cons of investing massive amounts of money combating climate change. I would do the same. Nobody can predict 100 years into the future with absolute certainty, and climate scientists aren't an exception. This doesn't mean that nothing should be done. Many capable people around Trump who will push him in the right direction. > let Putin run Trump as a puppet You fell for the FakeNews that's been going around, I see. > take away public education in favor of religious schools Don't care. > and let Goldman Sachs run all the banks? As opposed to the all the bankers Obama appointed to top positions? I only mention Obama to point out that it wouldn't have gone differently no matter who was elected, dem or repub, Goldman always gets in.", '>>{Freckled_daywalker} : An "investigation of the investigation" won\'t show anything because if they had any proof of her intent to mishandle we\'d have seen it by now. The IG did a seperate investigation and came to the same conclusion as the FBI, the server was stupid but not illegal and there\'s no evidence that proves she knew that there was classified material (since it was all unmarked or improperly marked) on the server. The amount of information on the server was comparitively tiny when compared to the volume of email on the server and it has all the hallmarks of being spillage rather than intentional mishandling. The meeting with the AG was almost certainly to give her a reason to step back and put the onus of the decision on Comey, which is a political stunt, not criminal. I get it, you hate her, but that doesn\'t change the facts.', '>>{stvenkman420} : *if it is proven. So no evidence so far, huh?', '>>{Brad_tilf} : I am willing to withhold judgment until the investigation is complete but, as they old saying goes - where there is smoke, there is fire. Or, would you prefer that I just make an uninformed decision like Trump voters did?', ">>{aYearOfPrompts} : Lol, Trump put GoldmanSachs in the White House. You don't have any courage to your convictions.", ">>{FartMartin} : Negligence not in the legal sense but that some in the FBI are not happy Comey didn't file charges which potentially could be the basis for reopening the case.", ">>{stvenkman420} : >where there is smoke, there is fire So, you know that's a fallacy, right? There were an awful lot of dead people surrounding Clinton. She must have had them killed. Where there's smoke....", ">>{Brad_tilf} : I know alot of dead people too. It's funny - the longer you live, the more dead people you know.", '>>{Freckled_daywalker} : I don\'t think the case is technically closed, but barring a discovery that Comey hid evidence (which, if it existed, I think would have been leaked by now), I\'m not sure what a new investigation could find. This whole thing hinges on intent and unless Hillary suddenly says "yup, totally knew what I was doing", there\'s always going to be reasonable doubt because none of the information was marked appropriately.', ">>{Tschmelz} : Oh, I'm sorry, do you need somebody to tell you not to do bad things?", ">>{Freckled_daywalker} : >I care about the first three you mentioned, and Trump has said that he will do whatever he can to keep them the way they are, while looking to solving our debt problem. His proposed health care policy on his website literally says he wants to privatize Medicare. That's the literally the opposite of keeping it the way it is.", '>>{Freckled_daywalker} : Eh, he arguably could have waited until he verified that there was actually new evidence. There was a high probability the emails were just copies of what they previously had and Comey, as FBI director, had wide latitude to decide what constitutes "a new development". He opted to cover his ass in case the evidence did turn out to be something new and it came out after the election, and that may be judged to have been contrary to long standing DOJ guidance against releasing information that could influence the election so close to election day. It\'s all pretty subjective, potential ethical violations, rather than criminal charges.', ">>{GaryRuppert} : i'm just saying.. if they were so bad, how come Obama didn't do anything?", '>>{LucienLibrarian} : http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/175/end-the-use-of-torture/ And those things are already barred, but Trump wants to change the rules...or ignore them.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{tkarocker} : I still have mine on 9.3.2. Can't justify updating yet.", '>>{WhatAnEpicTurtle} : Same. It just feels so fluid on iOS 9.', ">>{jonginator} : As long as you don't mind the major security flaws", '>>{maxiperalta54} : I was using ios9 on my SE all the way until last week. I thought I would hate ios10 but I actually like it better.', ">>{Pumba001} : You're going to get hacked no matter what. Don't think just because you updated, that you are safe. Don't be a fool.", ">>{jonginator} : I didn't say that. You are objectively safer by being on a later iOS with security flaws patched. That's undeniable.", '>>{Entertainnosis} : Not an SE but a 5S on iOS 9, after experiencing iOS 10 on a previous 5S I obtained another on iOS 9 which had been a much more pleasurable phone to use.', '>>{CurryGettinSpicy} : I was on iOS 9 for the longest time and just went to 10 and I gotta say it really damn good. I feel like the phone somehow got faster and my battery last a little longer now too. Although I really only switched for the stickers and iMessage effects lol.', ">>{itsmegeorge} : It's fluid on iOS 10 too. No SE user has any problem with it", '>>{Pumba001} : People love to live in a box of lies.'], ['>>{DKSArtwork} : The Pentagon has sent ISIS options to the White House', '>>{CampaignVeteran} : Fear not, Trump will choose the worst one.', ">>{SchwarzerKaffee} : Shouldn't Trump send the options to the Pentagon? After all, he knows more about ISIS than the generals. Believe him.", '>>{Erra0} : Incoming boots on the ground. Nothing distracts from scandal quite like the forced nationalism of ground combat operations.', ">>{olb3} : I mean, I hope you're right, but Donald Trump inspires absolutely no confidence.", ">>{IphtashuFitz} : Trump is just testing the generals in the Pentagon to make sure they're smart enough to be working there. He'll look at their plan and compare it to his own super-secret plan to see if they match his ideas. It's 572-D parcheesi after all.", '>>{FirstDimensionFilms} : Our military is still the best in the world. Our generals will have more of an affect than Trump will.', '>>{A_TEMPORAL_TOURIST} : Mr. President, I have here five unspeakable acts to resolve the.... I pick number three!', '>>{A_TEMPORAL_TOURIST} : Nah. They need a unifying terrorist attack on American soil destroying a landmark snd killing at least 3k people.', '>>{A_TEMPORAL_TOURIST} : I will have the yuuuuuuge oil tanker and giant hose ready', ">>{QuiteSomeBiscuit} : > I never thought I'd see the day where an anti ISIS comment was downvoted so heavily. I think it's more the simple-minded tone of the post than the anti-ISIS sentiment.", '>>{FirstDimensionFilms} : Ya but if I said "Fuck Trump" it would be +25.', ">>{olb3} : Just remember that for every bomb we drop in the middle of the desert 6,000 miles away, we could've built a school or a hospital, housed homeless veterans, or sponsored research. Also, remember that there is a strong chance that we end up creating the next generation of terrorists -- our track record in the middle east is not good...", '>>{JacobCrim88} : Donald knows more than the generals though. ^^^/s', ">>{RyanClinton2017} : If you had said simply fuck ISIS you probably would have gotten +25 as well. It's like saying fuck Donald the daughter fucker Trump, what you did instead.", ">>{StairheidCritic} : It will consist of his revolutionary 'plan' that no one in the history of warfare has ever thought of before; the unannounced attack.", '>>{arthurpaliden} : And none of then will have a real exit strategy that is designed to prevent the creation of ISIS II in the power vacuum once ISIS is dead and the US military leaves.', '>>{KirkBuckrogers} : His executive order to the joint chiefs ordered them to make a plan to deal with ISIS in 30 days. Trump will ask congress for War powers. Phase one: Restrict travel to all target countries. Phase two: Ask congress for war powers. Phase three: War Phase four: Take the oil. Reason? Control of world oil markets.', '>>{FL_Paratrooper} : > Wow I had no idea how many redditors support ISIS No… It’s the childish ‘rah rah Murica’ way you said it! And not to say it isn’t grotesque; but there are plenty of people who screw goats that aren’t ISIS affiliated, just lonely farm hands. I grew out of that epithet when I got out of my teens in the Army.', '>>{allnose} : >Phase four: Take the oil. I think it\'s worth noting that, aside from being politically unpalatable, and also a war crime, this really isn\'t a solution that\'s physically possible. It\'s not like Iraq just has all their oil stored in giant tanks that the US military could have taken on their way out. "Taking the oil" would basically mean setting up an Iraq-based oil company.', '>>{KirkBuckrogers} : Rex Tillerson has ample experience in "setting up" oil companies and negotiating oil contracts.', ">>{FirstDimensionFilms} : It's just an insult. You're looking way too far into it.", '>>{allnose} : Does he have experience defending oil facilities from a country unhappy that its natural resources are being plundered? We\'re not "taking the oil."', '>>{KirkBuckrogers} : Defending oil facilities will be the ONLY priority for THE MILITARY under the Tweeter In Chief. "You think our Country\'s so innocent?" Trump cares little for what other countries say. He can declare his target Muslim countries as terrorist nations then blame the entire mess on President Obama.', ">>{Scheisser_Soze} : We'll go in. ^At ^night.", ">>{allnose} : I don't like Trump any more than you do, but for God's sake, live in the real world.", '>>{KirkBuckrogers} : Trump said today that there will be the largest increase in defense spending in a generation. Open your eyes. He is going to ask for war powers and Republicans will give a weak President the power he needs.', ">>{allnose} : We're not taking the oil. That's all I'm saying to you. I don't think he's going to ask for war powers either, but that's mainly just because I don't think he's going to need them for whatever he wants to do", '>>{KirkBuckrogers} : Trump said "We will take the Oil." He also said we will build a wall, ban Muslims, repeal and replace the ACA. Why should we as Americans, believe contrary to what Trump himself has said the Red Hat Republicans will accomplish?', '>>{allnose} : Because building a wall is expensive and requires Congressional approval (which hasn\'t yet been given), but it\'s popular with half the country. Banning Muslims is popular with half the country, and can be completed solely through executive powers (maybe). Repealing the ACA was a major campaign plank for Trump and pretty much every congressional Republican. Less than half the country wants it, but if they don\'t support the repeal, they\'re losing their fanatical base. "Taking the oil" isn\'t like those. Not even Trump\'s base wants to start another war, making "taking the oil politically unpalatable, gives solid grounds for impeachment (war crimes are solidly within "High Crimes and Misdemeanors"), which would happen if *not* impeaching Trump would lead to losing Congressional seats, and, on top of that, is nearly impossible, logistically.', '>>{KirkBuckrogers} : Research "Presidential War Powers" Trump has the votes in congress. If given war powers, the President has exponentially more power to make decisions without congress based on "Law and Order" Your assumptions all factor in a check and balance to the Presidents power that will NOT be in place if given war powers. The fate of the 2018 elections is up in the air and Republicans believe they have a mandate that will keep them in power without fear of removal. They can speak out , but the real voice is how they vote. It\'s the Red Hats who set the table for disaster. Republicans tie their fate to Trump.', '>>{poiu477} : Which is why bush was impeached for war crimes lol keep dreamin pal', '>>{sleazus_christ} : and to make sure it is unannounced - since his administration leaks like a sieve - it will have to be executed the same day it is presented...no time to weigh pluses and minuses. YOLO-warfare!'], ['>>{Brad_tilf} : There will be an investigation of James Comey’s conduct. We might get some accountability, after all.', '>>{Brad_tilf} : My first thought on this is - Ok, great. Maybe there will be some accountability (or not) but so what? We already have Trump', ">>{Fluidfox} : Some accountability would be nice.... but you can't un-ring that bell. This entire election should have been thrown out and re-done from scratch at this point. Other countries have done it for way less. http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/07/01/484300814/austrias-top-court-throws-out-presidential-election-result-orders-a-do-over", ">>{wraithtek} : Small comfort, but we'll probably get to watch Trump badmouth an investigation of Comey, claiming it's all about him (de-legitimizing his win).", ">>{stuball81} : I hope we finally do get some accountability. To say that Clinton was just too fucking stupid to realize that material was classified that she had on her private server is asinine. Too say that Loretta Lynch meeting with Bill Clinton in secret a week before the findings came out isn't suspect, at the least. Yeah, lets get some accountability on all sides.", ">>{CuckStumperSupreme} : I agree with this, what the hell was going on with James Comey when he wouldn't indict career criminal Hillary Clinton? That matter needs to be investigated fully (and Hillary indicted).", ">>{Ulthanon} : May he die old and in utter disgrace. Of course, he'll be picked up by some consulting firm and get paid millions of dollars a year, conscience intact, but hey- I can dream.", ">>{FoChouteau} : Now's the time for Comey to release Trump's sex tape.", '>>{chest_rockwell_21} : On one hand, I see the point of this. On the other hand, I shudder to think about the optics of this and how Trump supporters will latch on to this to spin a specific narrative, despite the fact this is coming from the IG.', ">>{Seinfeldologist} : We need to investigate that again? How about an investigation of Trump's (and his teams) ties to Russia. Seems a little more prudent at the moment, wouldn't you agree?", '>>{Brad_tilf} : And the ties between Trump and Putin/Russia could constitute an unheard of compromise of the POTUS that simply cannot be allowed to happen', '>>{Brad_tilf} : No. Even the POTUS is accountable to someone. He could do that no more than Tricky Dick could call of the Watergate investigation', ">>{internetmaster5000} : During his sworn testimony to Congress in July when he was being questioned by Jim Sensenbrenner, Comey said he would update Congress with any new developments on the Clinton email investigation. He never closed the investigation, it became inactive. Then, when it was discovered that not all devices had been turned over to the FBI which contained emails from the Clinton server, Comey amended his previous testimony to Congress saying the investigation had been reactivated.   It might not make the users of r/politics happy, but there really isn't a case here.   I will also refer to the 1992 case when independent council for the Iran Contra investigation Lawrence Walsh indicted former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger (who had served with George HW Bush in the Reagan administration) on perjury charges four days before the 1992 Presidential election. Those charges were dropped two months later. It would be a lot easier to take the Clinton's outrage about Comey seriously if they hadn't been so ebullient in their defense of Walsh's decision in 1992.", ">>{chest_rockwell_21} : Oh I'm aware. Just figured I'd take the bait for the hell of it to pose the question. Sometimes, you treat these people who are clearly trying to troll like grown ups, and they literally do not know how to react.", ">>{sprucetrap87} : He wouldn't be calling off an investigation on himself though. Why couldn't he just pardon Comey?", ">>{Seinfeldologist} : In all honesty, there's a solid chance Congress doesn't do a damn thing. We could go four years with Putin having some level of control or sway over US policy and not know a thing.", ">>{Brad_tilf} : He can only pardon someone after they've been convicted of something. If he were impeached based on Comey's testimony then he wouldn't be in a position to do anything and Comey might just walk away without a government job", '>>{Brad_tilf} : Hopefully there is a reporter, or reporters, out there who are willing to do the real work and find the truth and expose it', '>>{radicalelation} : Shit, having business dealings with or even just knowing a handful of Russians is a security risk and can hurt your chances getting a standard DoD job.', ">>{DeadRedRussian} : He let's your girl off the hook twice and this is how he's repaid?", ">>{ShroudedSciuridae} : Yeah, provided the investigation only takes a week. Trump & Friends won't allow this to be carried to full term", ">>{Foxhound199} : The timing makes for a strange coincidence. And maybe that's all it is. That's what the investigation is for. If there's anything to suggest he sat on his decision to notify congress, however, he could be in deep doo-doo.", '>>{Seinfeldologist} : Still need Congress to take the next step. I have no faith at the moment.', '>>{corncobbdouglas2} : A lot of this may also feed Republicans looking to challenge him in 2020 - if Trump is still running again.', '>>{floridalegend} : Do over is the least this country can do to reclaim some dignity.', '>>{corncobbdouglas2} : Ford pardoned Nixon even though no charges were yet filed.', ">>{Brad_tilf} : I see your point. So, I suppose a pre-emptive pardon is possible but if these charges prove out to be true, it won't save his sorry ass", ">>{sprucetrap87} : I'm confused how Trump would be impeached for Comey's behavior while Obama was in office. Do you believe Trump colluded with Comey to release the letter about Hillary's e-mails?", '>>{ctolsen} : FBI said they found no criminal wrongdoing, and so did a host of other investigations including Senate Republicans. What the hell are you on about?', '>>{trollking66} : Nixon showed the dignity to resign- trump will never under any circumstance resign.', ">>{Brad_tilf} : I don't think Trump can be impeached for Comey's behavior. I think Trump will be impeached for being a traitor (and hopefully locked up). I think he colluded with the Russians and they have enough shit on him to seriously compromise him. I think Comey will pay for fucking with the election", ">>{FartMartin} : An investigation may backfire on those promoting it. It's possible, perhaps even likely declining to file criminal charges against her will be deemed negligence. Sometimes it's better to let sleeping dogs lie lest they bite you in the ass.", '>>{Checkma7e} : Accountability? For correcting his sworn testimony before Congress? Lol', ">>{sprucetrap87} : So you believe Trump will be impeached before an investigation of Comey concludes, the investigation will conclude that Comey did something illegal and Pence won't pardon Comey? I find those increasingly unlikely.", ">>{VROF} : When a majority of the voters listen to the Republican party promise to do things that will harm millions of people; and still vote for them we are totally fucked. Everyone is so afraid of Trump. We should be terrified of what Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell are going to do to us. And they have been promising to do it for years so it shouldn't be a surprise", '>>{VROF} : It would be nice to investigate the FBI and stop with the political witch hunts. If it is true that those agents read that idiotic book Clinton Cash and based inquiries on that then we should demand better from our federal agents.', '>>{VROF} : I agree that the outrage should be directed at Jason Chaffetz who released the information right after he re-endorsed Trump for president. But there are many legal scholars who feel this is a violation of the Hatch Act. There is also some question over whether or not the investigation should have been "reopened" especially when the answer was almost immediately "nope."', ">>{DeadRedRussian} : Shows how judgemental you are. I'm actually Irish-American.", ">>{GearBrain} : Either we do a new emergency election or we impeach the Human Dumpster Fire and work our way down the chain of succession until we find someone who won't spend the next four years fucking the country's asshole inside out.", ">>{Fluidfox} : Everybody lost this one, Gary. There's just a percentage of people that don't realize it yet.", ">>{ophelia_jones} : Country over party. I get that this is going to sound really naive, and I say it knowing that the likelihood that anything will stop this administration is smaller than a mouse fart, but it isn't even about dignity, it's just about doing the right thing. Things are only set in stone or unchangeable if people who have the ability to influence change do nothing out of despair or selfishness or fear.", '>>{chest_rockwell_21} : I\'m not saying I\'d base the decision on whether to go for it based on optics, so I definitely want to be clear that\'s not what I meant, and you\'re 100% right; however, I\'m just reflecting on how every single thing that involves the Presidential Candidates turns into trashy fodder for people to use as \'ammo\' against the other \'side\'. This was done by the IG, from what I understand they are pretty much non-partisan, so I know it wasn\'t done for optics. Just lamenting the fact that it will be used as ammo for a "GET OVER IT HE WON" response from people who are "PRO-TRUMP" cause he "tells it like it is" and "isn\'t PC".', '>>{GaryRuppert} : Keep telling yourself that. America just avoided the mistake of a Hillary Presidency', ">>{DX3906} : You're not far off, you just got confused by the fact that a pardon requires an *admission* of guilt, not a conviction.", '>>{veniceinperil} : Not trolling: What do you think a Hillary Presidency would have done?', ">>{Tschmelz} : Wow. You're definitely in for a shock when Trump tries to go full tyrant. The question is whether or not he succeeds.", '>>{Zifnab25} : I can name at least one person who is totally still winning.', '>>{GaryRuppert} : Admitted millions of migrants that would upend American life while governing through executive order and undermining representative democracy Along with radical anti-male policies in the name of some form of feminism', '>>{veniceinperil} : What kind of radical anti-male policies? (Again, not trolling.)', '>>{JesusHRChrist} : Same shit that we had for the last 16 years', '>>{pb2crazy} : If Comey gets reprimanded and fired, Trump will just replace him with someone even worse. So lol.', ">>{CuckStumperSupreme} : The Obama administration protected Hillary, there hasn't been a proper investigation yet with an attorney general willing to follow the law.", ">>{RiverSnake412} : For the IG to prosecute Comey, would they have to prove his *intent*? Because that'd be ironic.", '>>{ElliottWaits} : In terms of foreign policy and corporate welfare, yeah probably, but Trump may very well plunge us into much worse than what we had for the last 16 years.', '>>{GaryRuppert} : Unlimited abortion, sex-selection abortion, policies that would discriminate against males and favor females', ">>{bdog2g2} : Go through this guys post history then ask yourself if you think you'll get an honest, intelligent response.", '>>{veniceinperil} : O.k., maybe not. Thanks for the heads up.', ">>{thats_bone} : I put this loss down to 3 things: * Comey's meddling * Anthony Weiner enabling Comey's meddling * The Right using accusations of Spirit Cooking and occult practices to scare religious people of color. If those 3 things hadn't happened, we would be enjoying the first female President, who would be fighting for equality for all, not just Trump's billionaire friends.", '>>{bdog2g2} : The time I saved you should be enough to backup the porns Sessions is going to take from you.', '>>{ElliottWaits} : You really think women are out there getting abortions based on the sex of the fetus?', ">>{S7usek} : I can't tell if you're insane or criminally stupid. I'm no fan of Hillary, deeply opposed her for president, but if you think THOSE were the threats that she posed there is something seriously wrong with your ability to use logic and reason.", ">>{thecooldude20} : More silent wars like all the countries Obama is bombing, toppling of Assad and an ISIS takeover of Syria, confrontation with Russia over her proposed noflyzone, total sellout to the banks who funded her campaign, cronyism reaching levels only Hillary's touch of corruption could bring, 500+ thousand Muslim refugees bringing their views on women and gays here and producing some terrorists while they are at it (Context: I have a Muslim relative who came as a refugee to America 2 years ago, and he freaked out and cried in anger cause he found that someone had put a picture showing his mothers face on their facebook account), an amnesty bill for millions of illegals and if the repubs wouldn't pass it through congress then the current clusterfuck of a situation with a weak border, more globalism with the passing of the TPP killing more jobs than NAFTA did, the continuing growth and festering of toxic SJW ideology throughout the country. And those were just off top of my head.", '>>{Zifnab25} : Republicans shoved a thousand copies of "Clinton Cash" into an already-deeply-suspicious FBI and convinced a sufficient number of career professionals that Hillary was guilty of something. And they weren\'t alone. I can\'t count the number of times I saw "Clinton Cash" cited, referenced, or linked to on Reddit. Lots of people were suckered by GOP propaganda. I can\'t count the number of times I saw people claim Hillary stole the election. Or that she was a tool of the fossil fuel industry. Or that she hated black people, because she was friends with W. Virginia Senator Robert Byrd. Or that she raped kids in a DC pizzeria. It would have been sweet to see Hillary win, despite all the bullshit. But ringing Comey out to dry isn\'t going to prevent Republicans from flooding the next election cycle with another round of "Democrats are corrupt! Their charities are just fronts for ISIS!" lies Hillary got hit with.', ">>{LucienLibrarian} : In favor of a Russian puppet who is openly embracing 3rd world levels of kleptocracy with his family? I dont like Hillary either, but c'mon.", '>>{corncobbdouglas2} : I would actually think Trump is unlikely to want to fight should he start slipping into impeachment territory. He is under the impression that regardless of how shamefully he acts, if he spins it as a win, its a win.', ">>{veniceinperil} : And you'd rather gut Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, withdraw from the Paris Accords, do nothing about global warming, torture people with life-begins-at-conception laws, let Putin run Trump as a puppet, take away public education in favor of religious schools, and let Goldman Sachs run all the banks?", '>>{LucienLibrarian} : He wants to allow the torture of suspects, murder the families of criminals, create religious tests, etc. No friend of Putin is a friend of mine.', ">>{corncobbdouglas2} : I actually don't care about Comey. I still think he probably acted poorly, but not in an intentionally negligent way.", ">>{stvenkman420} : Liberals are now the crazy ones. Blaming the fact their corrupt queen lost on the FBI director that was just doing his job. I guess all those emails you guys don't want to talk about played no factor in her defeat, huh? Lol", ">>{Freckled_daywalker} : Sure there has. The investigation was months long and was incredibly thorough. What exactly do you think they missed? Comey explained the law and why he came to his conclusion. He's no fan of Hillary and had complete control of his recommendation. Just because you *feel* like she's a criminal doesn't mean there's an actual criminal case against her. Edit: took out a claim I can't source.", '>>{stvenkman420} : So the emails played no factor? Great analysis!', ">>{GaryRuppert} : It's gonna become more common in the future if action isn't taken", '>>{stvenkman420} : Lol, you sound kind of bitter. Maybe a little sore?', '>>{Freckled_daywalker} : Under what theory of law would excercising prosecutorial discretion constitute negligence?', '>>{stvenkman420} : Maybe there were nuggets of truth in that book.', ">>{stvenkman420} : Lol, crazy liberals talking about how Trump's a traitor. The left has gone full cray!", '>>{Brad_tilf} : And I suppose colluding with the Russians (if it is proven) would be something other than traitorous?', ">>{trollking66} : Right on, I just don't think his arrogance of self would allow it, I suspect he would not believe he could lose, and he would claim a rigged system if he did.", '>>{CuckStumperSupreme} : The investigation was an operation designed to give immunity to all witnesses and to gather and destroy all evidence. James Comey has connections to the Clintons through the Clinton Foundation, and we all know that the Attorney General met with Bill Clinton before the opinion was released. Congress is still investigating Hillary currently, and as Trump said, there needs to be an investigation of the investigation.', ">>{thecooldude20} : >Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare I care about the first three you mentioned, and Trump has said that he will do whatever he can to keep them the way they are, while looking to solving our debt problem. Even if he ends up cutting 10-20% of those programs, it wouldn't outweigh his other policies that I like, or erase the disaster that would be a Hillary presidency. And btw, Trump will be re elected cause the guy is a strategic mastermind, and gutting those programs would mean an automatic loss. Don't count on him gutting them. > do nothing about global warming Trump said in the New York Times interview shortly after the election that he will carefully weigh the economic pros and cons of investing massive amounts of money combating climate change. I would do the same. Nobody can predict 100 years into the future with absolute certainty, and climate scientists aren't an exception. This doesn't mean that nothing should be done. Many capable people around Trump who will push him in the right direction. > let Putin run Trump as a puppet You fell for the FakeNews that's been going around, I see. > take away public education in favor of religious schools Don't care. > and let Goldman Sachs run all the banks? As opposed to the all the bankers Obama appointed to top positions? I only mention Obama to point out that it wouldn't have gone differently no matter who was elected, dem or repub, Goldman always gets in.", '>>{Freckled_daywalker} : An "investigation of the investigation" won\'t show anything because if they had any proof of her intent to mishandle we\'d have seen it by now. The IG did a seperate investigation and came to the same conclusion as the FBI, the server was stupid but not illegal and there\'s no evidence that proves she knew that there was classified material (since it was all unmarked or improperly marked) on the server. The amount of information on the server was comparitively tiny when compared to the volume of email on the server and it has all the hallmarks of being spillage rather than intentional mishandling. The meeting with the AG was almost certainly to give her a reason to step back and put the onus of the decision on Comey, which is a political stunt, not criminal. I get it, you hate her, but that doesn\'t change the facts.', '>>{stvenkman420} : *if it is proven. So no evidence so far, huh?', '>>{Brad_tilf} : I am willing to withhold judgment until the investigation is complete but, as they old saying goes - where there is smoke, there is fire. Or, would you prefer that I just make an uninformed decision like Trump voters did?', ">>{aYearOfPrompts} : Lol, Trump put GoldmanSachs in the White House. You don't have any courage to your convictions.", ">>{FartMartin} : Negligence not in the legal sense but that some in the FBI are not happy Comey didn't file charges which potentially could be the basis for reopening the case.", ">>{stvenkman420} : >where there is smoke, there is fire So, you know that's a fallacy, right? There were an awful lot of dead people surrounding Clinton. She must have had them killed. Where there's smoke....", ">>{Brad_tilf} : I know alot of dead people too. It's funny - the longer you live, the more dead people you know.", '>>{Freckled_daywalker} : I don\'t think the case is technically closed, but barring a discovery that Comey hid evidence (which, if it existed, I think would have been leaked by now), I\'m not sure what a new investigation could find. This whole thing hinges on intent and unless Hillary suddenly says "yup, totally knew what I was doing", there\'s always going to be reasonable doubt because none of the information was marked appropriately.', ">>{Tschmelz} : Oh, I'm sorry, do you need somebody to tell you not to do bad things?", ">>{Freckled_daywalker} : >I care about the first three you mentioned, and Trump has said that he will do whatever he can to keep them the way they are, while looking to solving our debt problem. His proposed health care policy on his website literally says he wants to privatize Medicare. That's the literally the opposite of keeping it the way it is.", '>>{Freckled_daywalker} : Eh, he arguably could have waited until he verified that there was actually new evidence. There was a high probability the emails were just copies of what they previously had and Comey, as FBI director, had wide latitude to decide what constitutes "a new development". He opted to cover his ass in case the evidence did turn out to be something new and it came out after the election, and that may be judged to have been contrary to long standing DOJ guidance against releasing information that could influence the election so close to election day. It\'s all pretty subjective, potential ethical violations, rather than criminal charges.', ">>{GaryRuppert} : i'm just saying.. if they were so bad, how come Obama didn't do anything?", '>>{LucienLibrarian} : http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/175/end-the-use-of-torture/ And those things are already barred, but Trump wants to change the rules...or ignore them.'], ['>>{coltsmetsfan614} : Donna Brazile Apparently Tipped The Clinton Campaign Off To A Town Hall Question', '>>{coltsmetsfan614} : >Donna Brazile, a former CNN contributor and Bill Clinton campaign adviser, apparently emailed a Hillary Clinton campaign staffer a question that was expected to be asked at the CNN Democratic presidential town hall debate in March. >In an email titled, “From time to time I get the questions in advance,” Brazile appeared to tip off Clinton communications director Jennifer Palmieri to a question about the candidate’s stance on the death penalty. >“Here’s one that worries me about HRC,” read the email sent by Brazile, who is currently serving as the acting chair of the Democratic National Committee. >>19 states and the District of Columbia have banned the death penalty. 31 states, including Ohio, still have the death penalty. According to the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, since 1973, 156 people have been on death row and later set free. Since 1976, 1,414 people have been executed in the U.S. That’s 11% of Americans who were sentenced to die, but later exonerated and freed. Should Ohio and the 30 other states join the current list and abolish the death penalty? >Palmieri responded by saying the question is “one she gets asked about. Not everyone likes her answer but can share it.” (Palmieri didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.)', ">>{microsoftnotgreen} : So now the republicans are trying to distract from Russians meddiling in our elections by claiming a country is going that for the other side. How sad of hen. They're desperate.", ">>{GregoryPanic} : Death penalty is not the highest on my priority list. This isn't about the perfect candidate, it's about a platform I can deal with and compromise with for now. Having public option back on the table, and overturning citizens united are the two largest things for me at this point. Honestly, overturning cit united should cause a significant amount of dominoes to fall and see many corrupt behaviors go away - like private prisons. She has this Bernie voter. Don't speak for me", ">>{coltsmetsfan614} : I was a Bernie voter, and now I'm a Hillary voter. I'm justing posting any new stories I see.", ">>{TheRunner_PD} : >Death penalty is not the highest on my priority list. This isn't about the perfect candidate, it's about a platform I can deal with and compromise with for now. Having public option back on the table, and overturning citizens united are the two largest things for me at this point. >Honestly, overturning cit united should cause a significant amount of dominoes to fall and see many corrupt behaviors go away - like private prisons. >She has this Bernie voter. Don't speak for me Err... I agree with you...", '>>{TheTelephone} : Are HRC supporters now claiming that leaked e-mails are hoaxes created by Russia? Is this like Trump claiming that climate change is a Chinese hoax?', ">>{GregoryPanic} : Oh, I thought you meant Clinton isn't getting Bernie voters. Post was vague", ">>{blahblah24x} : The contents of the death penalty answer is not what this article is about. It's about another case of the DNC tipping the scales in Clinton's favor. It's about possible media collusion or at least either the media's disinterest or their ignorance in possibly supplying a certain candidate information before a debate. It's infuriating the lack of outcry from democrats because they feel the need to defend Hillary and her surrogates every step. The democratic primary was a sham election and undemocratic. If the lack of outcry continues the next democratic primary will in all likelihood be a sham election and undemocratic. And the one after that. If these actions are what they would do in their own party's election, it doesn't bode well for what actions they would be willing to take in a general election to win.", ">>{RajivFernanDatBribe} : > Are HRC supporters now claiming that leaked e-mails are hoaxes created by Russia? Yes. It's hilarious.", ">>{RajivFernanDatBribe} : Hillary is both for and against the death penalty (and every other issue) depending on how much money you give her. What makes you think she cares about the platform even though she is on record as against all of Bernie's provisions?", '>>{Digit-Aria} : They previously claimed the paid speech transcripts made HRC "look good, if not better." Now they\'re fakes. Again.', ">>{GregoryPanic} : She's been consistent on the death penalty. She thinks we need it, but to only use it in the most stringent of cases. I believe she also wants to reduce the state's ability to use it and leave it to federal - which I'm OK with because at least then it's use would be consistent. I still think it ultimately needs to go. Because Bernie and his supporters will hold her accountable. Hate to say it, but don't make the good the enemy of the perfect. Everyone knows Bernie wasn't going to be the Savior, but looking what he did to the election - a huge part has become about citizens united. It's apparent to me she has changed on a number of issues and moved left in areas. I'm good with that for now. It's most important to start filling the house and Senate and local government with progressive voices. In the meantime, I'm with her.", ">>{RajivFernanDatBribe} : > moved left in areas. I'll believe it when I see it. >I'm with her. I wish she were with us instead.", ">>{TheTeenageOldman} : Why would they need to collude with anyone to win a general election? Trump's already making the case as to why people should vote for HRC, and likely or a Trump-backed proxy will be back in 4 years to split the party once again.", '>>{QuixoticMcGee} : The day before a town hall with a question about the death penalty, Brazile sent an email with the subject: "From time to time I get the questions in advance" with a death penalty question.', '>>{GregoryPanic} : Don\'t get me wrong, the DNC needs an overhaul. I was furious during the primary, I am still a Bernie Bro. But it\'s too damn late now, and I\'m not having Trump or "What\'s Aleppo" Johnson in charge of my brothers and sisters in the military. I don\'t think the outcry for change at the DNC is going away, I certainly won\'t let it. But right now we\'ve got 29 days til go time. Suck it the fuck up and start campaigning for people supporting change in the house and local governments, that\'s how well see it fixed.', '>>{Bobbydeerwood} : I am a lifelong Hillary and DNC supporter, but this is crazy and this is not a Hillary issue, but a DNC issue. These leaks have been verified and that Brazile was helping to undermine the Sanders campaign and is now the head of DNC feels very undemocratic. I want Hillary to win fair and square like she would have, not win with a cloud of suspicion. "Interim chair of the Democratic National Committee Donna Brazile said she would impose tougher standards on staff going forward after email leaks showed some party leaders plotted to undermine the insurgent campaign of Sen. Bernie Sanders."', '>>{AmericaGreat} : This is from March, and both sides got the question in advance', ">>{blahblah24x} : Firstly it sets a standard, it's not just about this general but all general elections, brings questions to the validity of previous elections and the validity of future ones. And secondly there could have been possible collusion or other undemocratic action taken behind closed doors this general to get to where we are, the point is the suspicion is there now that we know a little more about what the democratic establishment is capable of doing when they run their own primary elections.", '>>{coltsmetsfan614} : The story is from now though. And how do you know both sides got the question?', ">>{blahblah24x} : I vehemently disagree. Supporting and electing the candidate who became the candidate partly because of undemocratic actions is not the best way to see it fixed. It's the best way to see it continued. You don't get to have more leeway to upend our democracy based on how good of a candidate you are compared to the others, you set the same standards across the board. Otherwise our system of government begins to falter as more and more candidates see how far they can go bending and breaking the rules in place. The best way to see this fixed is nip it in the bud right when we see it, have no tolerance to undemocratic actions.", '>>{TheTeenageOldman} : Does it only call into question elections that Democrats won?', ">>{GregoryPanic} : The alternative is putting horrifically unqualified people in charge of the military. Can't do that, as a vet I have a responsibility to those who went before me and those who go after me to vote in the person who will not misuse their lives. There is absolutely no candidate other than Clinton for that job. Johnson and Trump would be a fucking disaster in a world where were quickly approaching a second cold war. Great, you see a gaping hole in the wall. Don't tear down the wall and rebuild it, patch it up. A fuck load of people died building the wall in the first place, patching it up over the years.", '>>{blahblah24x} : No of course not. I imagine undemocratic acts are only more likely to make a candidate win, not guarantee them to win. So no reason to think they could have engaged in them and still end up losing. At the very least, it calls into question the validity of all elections that the DNC played a part in while either Debbie Wasserman Schultz or Donna Brazile were a part of the DNC.', ">>{blahblah24x} : That's all subjective though. One could say Clinton ramping up tensions against Russia would more likely put our military in danger. One could say the absolute lack of support Trump has is less likely to see him have any support in starting any wars. One could say Johnson's non-interventionist or isolationist views would more likely make sure not to see our military engage in unnecessary combat. None of that are absolute truths. The absolute truth is that a high ranking member of the DNC undemocratically helped get a candidate nominated. And that candidate is running for president now. Knowing this we can either elect her or not, and that's the decision we face. Hillary is part of the gaping hole in the wall. Patching it means getting rid of that gaping hold in the wall."]]

classify and reply

['>>{LostAccountant} : Because russians would like his appeasement politics to their agression', '>>{pingveno} : Maybe not fascism per se. World War 2 is not quite forgotten.', '>>{SatanicBloodOrgy} : Because Russians know that Putin would dance circles around Trump on the world stage.', '>>{Quinnjester} : Donald Trump is a threat to the western world.', '>>{anon902503} : In practice Putin is a true fascist. But he still likes to use the name "fascist" as an epithet for his geopolitical enemies.', '>>{wyldcat} : > "Obviously, Russia would prefer Trump," says Fyodor Lukyanov, editor-in-chief of Russia in Global Affairs. > > "It\'s quite understandable that Russia would prefer the candidate who is making statements. I wouldn\'t call them pro-Russian, but they correspond pretty well to the Russian picture of how the world should be. Pretty scary considering how Russia is treating LGBTQ people, journalists and other people critical of the government. Trump\'s "sensitivity" to being criticized should raise a few flags, as we all know he can be baited by just a tweet.', '>>{throwawaywriterhack} : you need to do research. it was Hillary as sec state that putin ran circles around', ">>{SatanicBloodOrgy} : It's Trump who showers Putin with praise and talks about recognizing Crimea as part of Russia.", ">>{throwawaywriterhack} : that wasn't the topic but, do you know that re world issues, putin and Russians agree with trump/Clinton americans on 90-95% of the time.", '>>{cainmar19847} : When the other one is threatening war with you over emails or bombing ISIS, it takes little imagination to figure why Russia favors Trump.', '>>{escalation} : Well she made it kind of easy by having an open server to track her every play with']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{LostAccountant} : Because russians would like his appeasement politics to their agression', '>>{pingveno} : Maybe not fascism per se. World War 2 is not quite forgotten.', '>>{SatanicBloodOrgy} : Because Russians know that Putin would dance circles around Trump on the world stage.', '>>{Quinnjester} : Donald Trump is a threat to the western world.', '>>{anon902503} : In practice Putin is a true fascist. But he still likes to use the name "fascist" as an epithet for his geopolitical enemies.', '>>{wyldcat} : > "Obviously, Russia would prefer Trump," says Fyodor Lukyanov, editor-in-chief of Russia in Global Affairs. > > "It\'s quite understandable that Russia would prefer the candidate who is making statements. I wouldn\'t call them pro-Russian, but they correspond pretty well to the Russian picture of how the world should be. Pretty scary considering how Russia is treating LGBTQ people, journalists and other people critical of the government. Trump\'s "sensitivity" to being criticized should raise a few flags, as we all know he can be baited by just a tweet.', '>>{throwawaywriterhack} : you need to do research. it was Hillary as sec state that putin ran circles around', ">>{SatanicBloodOrgy} : It's Trump who showers Putin with praise and talks about recognizing Crimea as part of Russia.", ">>{throwawaywriterhack} : that wasn't the topic but, do you know that re world issues, putin and Russians agree with trump/Clinton americans on 90-95% of the time.", '>>{cainmar19847} : When the other one is threatening war with you over emails or bombing ISIS, it takes little imagination to figure why Russia favors Trump.', '>>{escalation} : Well she made it kind of easy by having an open server to track her every play with']]

classify and reply

['>>{truthhurts4444} : Rape is a crime, not a culture. "Rape culture" is a myth invented by feminists who somehow believe that listening to Blurred Lines by Robin Thicke will make men go on a rape rampage', ">>{BlankVerse} : Clinton: Trump can't 'speak of protecting Syrian babies' while pushing a ban of refugees", '>>{mcndjxlefnd} : Hillary, please go back into your evil lair. We are done with your political input.', '>>{NoamChomskyIran} : Chomsky: U.S; not Iran, the greatest threat to world peace', ">>{Mr_Billy} : Just because we try to protect some doesn't mean we end up adopting them. Otherwise all policemen houses would also be overrun. Go back to the woods Hilary.", ">>{SchooledGaming} : She's not wrong. The hypocrisy is never ending...", ">>{kingsumo_1} : Is there anything that Chomsky has said in the last, hell who knows how long, that has not been against America? I'm pretty damn vocal on my stance about the big orange twat running the country and the GOP as a whole, but gods I am tired of people giving Chomsky the time of day.", ">>{clone822} : Sure he can. Doesn't even have to be Syrian babies. We're pushing a pro-life position while cutting WIC.", ">>{probablyuntrue} : Trump cares so much about they he'll drop a 1.4 mil dollar bomb on their head!", ">>{slakmehl} : > Is there anything that Chomsky has said in the last, hell who knows how long, that has not been against America? No. I think Hitch said it best: Chomsky doesn't think the United States of America was a very good idea. It's all genocide back to columbus for him.", ">>{slakmehl} : He's a genius, but his schtick is using his intellect to defend mildly insane opinions. Maybe he thinks it would go to waste if his positions were merely true.", '>>{75000_Tokkul} : [So are his supporters at this very moment.](https://np.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/search?q=Pussy&restrict_sr=on&sort=new&t=all)', ">>{rogerpool123} : I love that Hillary is planning out Trump's Syrian policy. And the Trump supporters hate it.LOL", ">>{reid8470} : Did you watch the video? He cited polling of people from around the world and Defense analysis of military capability, not some opinion pulled out of thin air. Look at our political climate. We just elected Donald Trump on a platform of increased military spending, advocacy of war crimes, isolationism, ignorance of the threats climate change poses to global stability, etc. etc. etc. Consider that his critique of US foreign policy could very well be justified, especially when it's as volatile as our political climate.", ">>{SKINMASK2016} : Why not? He never claimed that every refugee was bad or even dangerous, just that enough of them are threats to US citizens to make the whole process not worth it. Syrian and surrounding region safe zones have been spoken of for years now, who's to say Trump can't go that route? That's what Syrians want... https://youtu.be/s3uaf1NFxXc", '>>{75000_Tokkul} : A libertarian being able to win the presidency is not a thing. That is the standard of "not a thing" this election. The rape culture as shown by Trump\'s comments and is supporters claiming that\'s just how men are shows how rape culture **is a thing** in America.', '>>{UvonTheDeplorable} : Rape culture, hate culture. The guy is truely deplorable', '>>{Jetstar64} : The more something seems like it\'s a part of the "norm" the more it will be.', '>>{DyedInkSun} : >Hitch said it best [here\'s the clip](https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4640289/christopher-hitchens-marx-new-left-sympathies-theocratic-nihilists) >"If you think the United States is a bad idea you may feel a sneaking sympathy for others who feel the same" Could apply that quote to all the Julian Assange groupies & Putin apologists as well.', ">>{Krakatoa12} : Sorry if reality intrudes but this has been the case since Lyndon Johnson was POTUS and put half a million troops into South Vietnam and god knows how much money spent on the whole debacle. Trump is indeed like many Americans. Hard to admit when you're wrong.", '>>{DrDaniels} : I always have low expectations of /r/The_Deplorables and yet somehow they still manage to disappoint each time.', '>>{truthhurts4444} : Being a rape victim is trendy and popular. There is no faster way for a woman to gain sympathy and attention then for her to say she was raped. Now "girl who cried rape" is the new "boy who cried wolf" The fabrication of "rape culture" has occurred concurrently with the rise of rape victimhood celebration. Coincidence? I think not.', '>>{slakmehl} : Yep, some people are pre-programmed to hate whoever has the best weapons.', ">>{Brad_tilf} : Why won't Clinton just shut the fuck up? Retire and go away.", '>>{chasjo} : Whenever a controversial event occurs, I know my first reaction is what does someone incompetent enough to lose an election to Donald Trump think about this? Lucky for me it looks like the national\u200b media is determined to keep quoting this person who is too delusional to understand her own shortcomings every damn time something happens.', '>>{altuniverseyou} : Recently Chomsky said "You think we don\'t have killers? We\'re not so innocent." Oh wait, that was the republican president of the united states.', '>>{TryAndFindmeLine} : Yes, because half of the country voted for this genius: >>HIATT: So what do you think China’s aims are in the South China Sea? >TRUMP: Well I know China very well, because I deal with China all the time. I’ve done very well. China’s unbelievably ambitious. China is, uh… I mean, when I deal with China, you know, I have the Bank of America building, I’ve done some great deals with China. I do deals with them all the time on, you know, selling apartments, and, you know, people say ‘oh that’s not the same thing.’ The level of… uh, the largest bank in the world, 400 million customers, is a tenant of mine in New York, in Manhattan. The biggest bank in China. The biggest bank in the world. Anyone who thought *that* guy was fit to be anything more than the town dogcatcher seriously needs their head examined.', ">>{DeanBlandino} : Stop taking it personally. Philosophical history basically believes America is the product of Europe, but that America is the tool with which Europe is destroying itself and the world. If you don't believe in capitalism, how can you not blame America for being the exporter of capitalism around the globe? Capitalism = Armageddon for many in philosophy.", '>>{TheDaggestOfNabbits} : The irony is that your post is a whataboutism.', ">>{DeanBlandino} : Seriously. Americans say they love what America does for them and are frustrated about what it does wrong, but imagine how God damn *terrifying* America is to any other country? We fuck shit up wherever we want and never learn from our mistakes. Good intentions don't fly abroad, hypocrisy is a price paid in foreign lives. Can you imagine how much you would hate America if you were Iranian? We talk shit about your government while surrounding your country with military force and overthrew your democratic government FFS.", ">>{mcndjxlefnd} : Exactly why. She's a loser of epic proportions.", '>>{TryAndFindmeLine} : Only because 60 million Americans are dumb as hammered shit.', ">>{75000_Tokkul} : Did you know their current top mod can't even vote for Trump because they are a well known racist Danish Redditor? Did you know their most popular ex-top mod created /r/altright until he was removed from there for having Jewish blood? They always have a new way to disappoint.", '>>{potatojoe88} : Why do you care so much whether or not she says things?', ">>{Huck77} : We blow up whatever we want and act like it is fine. What other country in the world could launch 59 missiles at another and then say with a straight face that it wasn't an act of war?", '>>{Boxy310} : >rape culture is not a thing >"I just grab \'em by the pussy... I don\'t even wait... You can do anything if you\'re a star" >that was just locker room banter! >Bill Clinton did it, so it\'s okay >all right, /r/the_safespace, who\'s ready to grab America by the pussy! k', ">>{red-light} : The fact that Clinton came out in support for these strikes dealt a huge blow to trump's more rabid supporters. She finally did something right, even if it was unintentional.", '>>{Patello} : Shh, "rape culture" is a trigger word for /r/the_dumpster. The kids are still sleeping, don\'t wake them up.', '>>{PozMyNeghole} : Bill Clinton raped many people and Hillary attacked his victims and ruined their lives though. If liberals didn\'t want "rape culture" on their hands they shouldn\'t have deregulated the sexual market place by attacking and undermining marriage as much as they can. This Hellish world they\'ve wrought into being is entirely on them.', '>>{mcndjxlefnd} : That explanation is a cop-out. I would argue that the Americans who voted against Hillary are smarter than the ones who voted *for* her (as opposed to against Trump).', '>>{anarchism4thewin} : Yes? What does that have to do with my comment?', '>>{75000_Tokkul} : I get the feeling you are going to be repeating that on the stand after being charged with rape sooner rather than later.', ">>{Huck77} : Isn't the birth and growth of the US pretty rife with genocide?", '>>{Boxy310} : OK, "truth hurts". Good luck rebuilding the Republican party. I\'m sure you\'ll do fine with that attitude.', '>>{Eva-Unit-001} : Someone should hire her to just follow Donny around and agree with everything he does.', ">>{Huck77} : I am not familiar with the specific quote you are talking about, but is the whataboutism that you are referring to the mile long list of times that the US has deliberately interfered in another country's elections or toppled an elected government?", ">>{verbose_gent} : Is Chomsky getting more active lately? I feel like I'm hearing his name more and more.", ">>{slakmehl} : Not really. Andrew Jackson's treatment of the Indians was pretty horrific and comes close. Chomsky tends to focus more on interventions into other countries, like installing Pinochet in Chile.", ">>{DeanBlandino} : Seriously. We are so indignant over Putin- more or less- contributing excessive funds/resources to Trumps campaign. Our uneducated population is more to blame than Russia (not saying we shouldn't impeach him but let's be real here). That is business as usual for America abroad. Put this in perspective. We mistakenly believed Vietnam attacked us and it triggered a war that disfigured their country to this day. We made things up about Iraq and bombed then into oblivion because we were angry after 9/11. America is a bully that hates their smaller classmates for not liking us. It's pathetic.", '>>{Patello} : Why are you disappointed? With all the popcorn I eat while browsing there, I am gonna be able to hibernate for the whole winter.', ">>{SchooledGaming} : Who said we shouldn't bomb Syria. Are you aware of a straw man?", '>>{YgramulTheMany} : She probably would have had some involvement in Syria, but she would not have banned Syrian children from finding a place of refuge in our country.', '>>{captaindabbin} : It is probably because just about everything he has warned the US of during his career is coming to a head right now.', '>>{FNSam} : The "refugees" she and Obama helped create?', ">>{Brad_tilf} : Because she isn't helping. She literally should not even be part of the discussion any more. She had her shot. Her history, along with some help from the FBI made her lose. It's time to retire and let someone else be involved.", ">>{politicalanimalz} : Chomsky is the broken clock of wanna-be pundits. He said all the same things about Obama...and was wrong every time. Now that there really is a nut in charge of the US, he's finally right for a change.", '>>{prodigalpariah} : Is it really that insane to think the us runs roughshod over the rest of the planet?', '>>{nightandshade} : Sure he can. Hypocrites do that shit all the time!', '>>{lasershurt} : This is the most interesting contrast to the "THERE IS NO SUCH THING" comments that are already flooding in. There is a huge group of people acting like advocating sexual assault is no big deal, it\'s "just how men are." Normalizing the idea of sexual predation is the very crux of "rape culture."', '>>{bitterbut_true} : Hillary has \'launched\' the GENDER WAR. She says in a tweet: "Women have the power to stop Trump". So that\'s it then? Men vs Women? By using Trump\'s normal male \'sex drive\' to destroy him, Hillary has also \'let the cat out of the bag\'. She is showing that a society\'s power struggle is not solely a class struggle (between rich \'n poor). It\'s also a gender struggle between males and females. \'Pussy\' has value and even \'property rights\'--just like a block of flats.', ">>{kingsumo_1} : It's not personal, and not like I don't agree with a number of his criticisms. But for as long as I can remember that's all he's done. It wears thin after awhile. It's one of the reasons I hate people like Beck and Hannity (although far from the only with them). After beating on that same drum for so long, I'm just tired of even seeing the name show up. I think it's mostly that I fail to see his overall relevance at this point, or why people feel the need to put so much stock into what he has to say. Yes America is kind of fucked up and yes it's a monster of our own making. But find a new stance once in awhile. Maybe I'm just tired and cranky.", '>>{nightandshade} : Oh yeah. Who knows how many more people could have been murdered by her satanic pedophile email server from that pizza place in Benghazi had she been elected??', '>>{ilikeyoohoo} : It\'s not that complicated. We live in a culture that accepts many, beliefs, attitudes and actions that make men more likely to commit rape or acts of violence against women. Not so much that it\'s celebrated, but men look the other way, dismiss or minimize it. I don\'t like the phrase "rape culture" either, but it does exist.', ">>{EditorialComplex} : Here's the thing. Yeah, she probably would have carried out these strikes. But she would have had a coherent foreign policy surrounding them. There would have been diplomatic pressure on Assad. She wouldn't gave given him the green light like Tillerson did last week. She would have had concrete goals. With her, we would have known that it was keeping with her worldview and mindset, which believes that American military force should be used to prevent humanitarian catastrophes, like what Bill did in Kosovo. Sure, you can call her a hawk for it, but it's an ethos that she sticks to. With Donald, we have no idea. He suddenly reversed everything he's been saying since 2013. Was he overwhelmed with grief for the kids? Was he looking to appear strong after months of seeming weak and incompetent, with his poll numbers flagging? Did he want to try and undermine Russia accusations? It could be any of these. We don't know.", '>>{rogerpool123} : My comment was more of a slur on stupid Trump supporters being conned by the slob, they have no idea. And there is no way Trump has any say in what happens in Syria or Iran or NK, the war mongering Republicans are acting on plans they have had for years and there aint no stopping them.', ">>{Boxy310} : K. I'm sure that's the exact talking points you need to rebuild after that fiasco. Why don't you say that as publicly and as many times as you can? I'm sure that'll work out great.", ">>{slakmehl} : No, and I did say 'mildly' insane. I would say his intimations that Bill Clinton was more evil than Saddam Hussein or Osama Bin Laden would qualify.", ">>{kingsumo_1} : I didn't say he was wrong or that I disagreed with him. I'm just tired of people dragging him out. It doesn't matter who's in charge or what we're doing, Chomski will find a reason to criticize it. It's not even so much about him as a person, is that people continue to try and keep him culturally relevant. I don't need his continued arguments to remind me of the shit show we're currently in.", ">>{bearrosaurus} : I don't get your joke here. Do you think children getting gassed by nerve agents is funny?", '>>{montereybay} : At this point, the news media shouldn\'t even report on what Trump said unless it is verified to be true. Otherwise they should just say "Trump lied again today." Passing on his message is exactly what he wants.', '>>{antiquegeek} : You are just tired and cranky if you have a knee jerk reaction to seeing a name. Learn to learn without letting emotions and trained responses rule your life like a fucking whale at sea world.', '>>{okayokaysure} : She is way too smart for this to have been unintentional.', ">>{Boxy310} : Say, /u/anarchism4thewin, what are your opinions on the police and legal system to prosecute people who are, say, serial rapists? I'm sure you have a wealth of well-reasoned legal arguments about deterring rapes.", ">>{slakmehl} : Don't take it personally. I view Chomsky in the same vein as Ayn Rand and Karl Marx. They are all wrong that everything is the fault of the poor, or the rich, or the government, or America. It would be wonderfully simple if the world were a perpetual 1943 with an obvious singular enemy of civilization, but that comes rarely.", ">>{chingazo} : Sure he can. He doesn't have a problem with the babies. It's the baby's parents he's concerned about.", '>>{DrDaniels} : Wait, the creator of /r/altright got removed for havinf Jewish blood? Holy shit, who was that and when did that happen?', ">>{landragon} : Remember that no fly zone she proposed? Those jets wouldn't have been flying at all", ">>{kingsumo_1} : Heh. Fair enough. Given the reaction I seem to have elicited from an off hand comment, you're probably right.", '>>{Donald_2016} : This recording has changed my views on the US having a rape culture.', ">>{75000_Tokkul} : [Here is a bit of them talking about it.](https://np.reddit.com/r/altright/comments/51a14r/im_stepping_down_as_moderator/d7agbh1) The deleted user is ciswhitemaelstrom's account.", '>>{drdawwg} : This time coming out for the thing trump did hours before he did it actually helps trump lose his base because it connects their precious Donald with their most hated politician.', ">>{FullClockworkOddessy} : It's just a desperate deplorable grasping for a way that Clinton is the person who's political career is deader than zydeco. Pay him no heed. They are the ramblings of a dying madman.", ">>{scobot} : I hate trump as much as the next sane citizen. The only reason he got elected is because Clinton is awful and plenty of people voted *against* her. I can't think of anything that would help Trump more than Clinton getting back on the public stage.", ">>{verbose_gent} : It's not a comment, it's a question. I'm asking. Has he been?", ">>{Joegotbored} : Trump seemed so concerned about those gassed babies and children, is generally forgetting that we don't know their parents and what they've been up to to? Cause that was his explanation for not wanting refugee families", ">>{Trump_carnage} : One huge difference, Johnson wasn't a narcissistic psychopath. Trump is.", '>>{FullClockworkOddessy} : Well you could look at your own fellow deplorables for one.', '>>{kittykat713} : Brock Turner getting 6 months in jail for assaulting a sleeping woman, because a harsher sentence would negatively affect his future.', '>>{anarchism4thewin} : That was not an unreasonable punishment for a first time offender.', '>>{John_Frum_} : They are an offshoot of redpill. What exactly did people expect them to believe about consent?', ">>{Brad_tilf} : Just the fact that alot of Dems support it would have done that anyway. Hell, I vote Dem and I'm not happy about this development at all.", ">>{ethical_consumer} : If you had an actual quote then maybe we could discuss it. But your biased interpretation of something he might have said isn't really grounds for discourse.", ">>{Boxy310} : How can I tell you're not a dog? It is the internet, after all.", ">>{DrDaniels} : Wasn't he doxed, and he ended up being a teenager?", '>>{75000_Tokkul} : His claim is that he was a law student and mentioned modding the place to a fellow student. Out of fear he would get expelled from school he deleted his account. Considering all the openly pro-rape comments, hate speech, and harassment he did on that account I could see him being worried if he did it using campus internet being punished. He also claimed he could t handle college and was going to use his Reddit modding to get a job.....somehow.', '>>{Viscount_Baron} : I think you may want to read up on Johnson. One word: "Jumbo".', ">>{AmericanFartBully} : No, it isn't. Because he's not really commenting on Russian hacking as much as Chomsky's misdirecting. After all, Chomsky's claim is the subject of the thread. So why wouldn't we otherwise speak to his credibility or relevance. Otherwise, why should we care what Chomsky thinks?", ">>{75000_Tokkul} : I mod /r/againsthatesubreddits. I am disappointed because no matter how many rules they break, harassment they cause, and hate speech they post the admins won't take real action. Their defense is their subreddit name just like how the /r/European Nazis got away with so much, which the admins let just move to /r/uncensorednews as their new home after.", '>>{AmericanFartBully} : >*the mile long list of times that the US has deliberately interfered in another country\'s elections or toppled an elected government?*" So you\'e saying it\'s okay when other countries do it? Is that your argument?', ">>{ilikeyoohoo} : 1. The statements Trump made that spurred this article. If he weren't a presidential candidate, no one would think much of it because it would be considered typical locker room talk. 2. The idea that if you get a woman drunk it's easier to fuck them is sometimes taken to extremes. Sometimes women choose to drink a lot and that's fine (so do men). But, they're often pressured or coerced to drink more than they normally would too, either directly, or women drink free keg parties at college campuses, no cover charge for women at clubs, stuff like that. 3. The belief that women must be submissive. This applies to sex and abusive relationships. 4. Blaming women for getting drunk or dressing sexy as the cause of their sexual assault, completely cutting out the actions of the perpetrator. It's just *expected* that men will act that way. 5. The idea that women have no value other than for sexual gratification. There's much more. But, that's all I got for now.", '>>{kittykat713} : 6 months in jail is not unreasonable for sexually assaulting an unconscious woman? And if you were sexually assaulted by someone while you were sleeping, would you feel the same way?', ">>{HankPeppercorn} : Your ability to completely misinterpret someone here is actually impressive. This person was literally asking a question and you're accusing him of making a statement barely related. Good job.", '>>{ExcitableNate} : Johnson was definitely those things. He was, however, intelligent. Which Trumpy is not.', ">>{Patello} : I think one of the main problems is that these are people that feed off of suppression. These are not people who have learned about action and consequences. Just look at how much they scream about posts being removed from /r/politics even though they were in violation of the rules. It doesn't matter to them if they break the rules or not, they are still going to go around crying censorship to anyone and everyone. While not ideal, I think having them contained in their own hateful corner of the Internet is the best we can hope for. And while they leach out sometime, if td would be removed, they would just spew their hate in other subs.", ">>{ExcitableNate} : I agree, though he is a good source. Just like anything else, you can't put all of your eggs in one basket. Chomsky is good for some things, not good for others.", ">>{75000_Tokkul} : >I think having them contained in their own hateful corner of the Internet is the best we can hope for. That is the whole point of a quarantine. They get get to have their space they just don't appear on /r/all and searches on Reddit.", ">>{Patello} : But if they know they are being quarantined, I think they would be more likely to brigade over subs to get their message across. I know it sounds like letting the terrorizers win, and in some sense it is, but I just don't see a realistic solution", ">>{admin-throw} : Chomsky's misdirecting? He's been pointing a laser at our empire and it's misdeeds for decades. Credibility? 13 books, MIT professor, wrote the book on modern linguistics, and has been on a lecture circuit for over 50 years. Name any counterpoint to his intellect that has a similar credibility. You might not agree with his middle east policy, but you are going to look like an idiot if you try to categorize him with the likes of Michael Moore or Ann Coulter. To address the post you defend... Chomsky doesn't suggest anyone can't complain about Russian election hacking, nor does he make any claim that peace with Russia is a bad thing. You need to be calling out those claims not the credibility of Chomsky. More importantly Chomsky doesn't even make the claim of this post's title. He states: What is the >world opinion< in regards to the greatest threat Iran or America, and cites Gallup poles that come back with the answer: America.", ">>{dberis} : It's too late, Noam. You're already irrelevant.", '>>{GetEquipped} : Johnson also had sympathy. [Here he is; crying after listening to his son-in-law tells him about the conditions in Vietnam](https://seanmunger.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/johnson-anguish-picture.jpg?w=940) LBJ\'s son-in-law was Capt. Charles Robb who was involved in operations. The tape recorder on the desk is playing back his briefing. Also, when LBJ signed the Civil rights act in 1964, he said: “I think we just delivered the South to the Republican Party for a long time to come." He knew politics, he knew how to play the game. There\'s a lot of photos of him invading people\'s personal space to make the other person feel uncomfortable or to seem intimidating to get his way ([Here\'s one](https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/2014/03/0414_BOB_Odonnell_CivilRights_Russell_V1/lead_large.jpg) ) But he didn\'t try to run the country into the ground for personal gains.', '>>{75000_Tokkul} : You could say the same about coontown or fatpeoplehate but after they had their fit they mostly moved off site. A large group just move to voat and 4chan/8chan to be with their own kind. If the admins were willing to actually take action and hire even just one person to remove those places they congregate they could remove places like /r/publichealthwatch, /r/incelabode, /r/coontown, /r/European, and /r/the_donald for good. Certain Reddit communities already find and list the public ones already making finding them easy. Give feedback by actually dealing with what is found will only make redditors more motivated to find them too. Many of them admit they want a nonquarantined subreddit only so they can link people to it filled with their hate. They want to spread their message around the site not have their own corner to post it.', '>>{cantstopthecrabs} : A lot of people outside America hate America. Source: Not American and lived in many non-American countries.', '>>{DrDaniels} : America needs to act in a way where other countries can look at us and think "Those are the good guys" The 9/11 Commission Report spelled it out that we gain allies and fight extremism by emulating positive values of liberty. This also means that we can\'t bomb whomever or support rebels or dictators around the world. America\'s actions around the globe affect our reputation very heavily which is why much of South America and the Middle East is very critical of American foreign policy. The CIA had a term called blowback that they came up with over 50 years ago yet it seems we still haven\'t learned to examine the consequences of our foreign policy. Iran is a state sponsor of terror and dangerous but the Islamic Republic isn\'t toppling governments around the world, though that\'s not due to lack of trying.', ">>{SuburbanDinosaur} : So what you're saying is that he's right and you generally agree with him, but you don't think he's relevant. How does that make any sense? If you're correct in your analysis, you're relevant.", ">>{SeenItAllHeardItAll} : His argument is that Iran has been spending not so much on military than others in the region and their strategy is defensive. Chomsky's claim can be backed up by the last 3 decades of Iran's behavior. One caveat may be the Iranian Revolutionary Guard which operates a rouge strategy somewhat independent of the state. There is a huge problem with the US Iran strategy. By declaring Iran an enemy the US looses the ability to influence Iran, drove it to and encourages it maintain its embrace of Russia. The outcome is the mess the US is facing in Syria where Russia and Iran are major players on which the US lacks influence.", ">>{GabrielJones} : Whether or not one agrees with Chomsky we need to be open to the things the US, or the West in general, does wrong. Our civilisation needs to be judged along with every other country and civilisation as part of being honest about ourselves and starting to do things differently. My favourite source of wisdom, Lahotar, puts it starkly: 'Oneness means peace,upliftment,equality,mercy. Not war,invasion,greed,drone strikes. USA has caused most damage in 5000 years,who can argue?' 'What’s civilised standards? Bailouts invasions drone strikes low wages low taxes for rich austerity for poor. Still want to be civilised?' 'Strange people these americans. They talk much of freedom n democracy. Then give us snooping drones invasions money printing n insecurity.' [http://www.lahotar.com] My position is not anti-US, it's that we need to accept every valid stat on what we are doing wrong, and allow activists such as Chomsky to have their say. At the very least we need to build a position where we have a clear moral authority in the world, and sadly we seem to be heading in the opposite direction.", '>>{redditorandcheef} : Chomsky is American, you can criticize something and be against it.', '>>{Sangriafrog} : That sounds like something that could have been said by Chomsky though.', ">>{lolpokpok} : Huge difference? I don't think the people on the receiving end of american aggression have ever cared about your presidents psychological condition.", '>>{doncajon} : And some people have ample reason to love what America has done for them. Hallo from Germany. And some people have reason to hate Chomsky, like the victims of the Red Khmer genocide, which he denied because of his lifelong anti-western obsession.', '>>{DeanBlandino} : Holy fuck did you just compare Karl Marx to Ayn Rand? You must not know anything about either, especially in terms of their value to philosophy..', ">>{McG4rn4gle} : That's a very powerful picture that I'd never seen before - heavy weighs the crown.", ">>{DeanBlandino} : Being a philosopher is not about taking a new stance. It's about developing a way of thinking and applying it to what's happening to help people understand the world around them. From his perspective- and it's historically valid- America is a bad actor in the world.", ">>{DeanBlandino} : If you believe the west is on a march toward Armageddon, what's the point at which you draw the lines in revolution? Capitalism produces global warming for example which will million millions and millions if not billions. These people are looking at a very big picture.", ">>{GetEquipped} : There are aides who worked with LBJ when he increased presence in Vietnam, he would listen/read to the list of casualties by himself in the Oval office to realize how many Americans were dying over there. He was so unsure about American commitment, he asked General and Former president Eisenhower if it was the right thing to do. Knowing that the Vietnam war would be his downfall, he instead did his best to push through other legislation, including Medicare, the Voting Rights Act, Gun control regulations, and reform on immigration (Although he had a different stance on the last one when he was a Senator 10 years prior) Like, the guy was an asshole. He had this very imposing presence and a tough guy routine, but it was a routine. I think he had to live up to Kennedy's promises, as well as deal with the Civil rights movement and escalating conflicts.", '>>{slakmehl} : Read both. Marx is better, but same search for a simplistic prescription for societies woes.', '>>{doncajon} : In what way is capitalism the deciding factor in whether you cause global warming?', '>>{DeanBlandino} : Ok then you read it without understanding it. There was nothing simplistic about what he was saying.', ">>{DeanBlandino} : The same way it is viewed as foundational to nuclear war. Basically we have no way of stopping. Destruction of the environment is foundational to any capitalist society. In fact this was much more widely discussed 100 years ago with the likes of Teddy Roosevelt (created vast majority of federal lands to protect things like Grand Canyon and maintain access). Heidegger chose the Nazis because he thought they could save the planet. Capitalism's insatiable desire for growth means we cannot stop, we cannot avoid discovering something, persuing something. It's a fragmented, fractured form of consciousness.", ">>{slakmehl} : You know you can say that without being personally insulting, right? He's a brilliant guy. So is Ayn Rand, for that matter. Chomsky is a certified genius. For all three of them, their *defenses* of their simplistic worldviews are themselves complex, and necessarily so. There is a reason Marxist economists are virtually extinct.", ">>{DeanBlandino} : I wasn't personally insulting. You just have no idea what you're talking about. Karl Marx is foundational. The guy is so much more important and impressive than Ayn Rand it's laughable to compare them. Hell, comparing Chomsky to Marx is laughable. Marx had a concept for describing the mechanics of an entire contemporary society, and it was so well done that people remain unable to move past his work nearly 150 years later. Calling it simplistic is so unbelievably ignorant. He's one of the greatest thinkers of human history lol", ">>{slakmehl} : Only familiar with Chomsky's political work, I'm guessing? Hard to argue his scientific work compares disfavorably with Marx. Edit: [this alone](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chomsky_hierarchy) blows away Marx's entire career, in my personal opinion.", '>>{bluekeyspew} : We use our military power to support our large businesses. We use our military power to support corrupt governments that support our corporations.', '>>{cats_catz_kats_katz} : What does that even have to do with what Chomsky was talking about? Literally, nothing.', ">>{doncajon} : The closest we ever got to nuclear war was when the Soviets were shipping nuclear missiles to Cuba in 1962. Since communism fell in Russia and since China abandoned it in all but its name, the risk should have gone up, according to you. I don't think that's the case though. I also don't think that communism or any other non-capitalist system I can think of lacked the hunger for growth, they merely lacked the ability and had to keep entire nations from defecting with iron curtains, while producing millions of casualties during the Holodomor, the Great Leap Forward and all those 5 year plans that would always end up producing too much and too little of what was actually needed.", ">>{MiniatureBadger} : He denied the Cambodian Genocide for decades, only admitting that it actually happened to a significant extent in 1993. He doesn't deny it now, but he was a genocide denialist for as long as he could be one just because he supported the ideology of the perpretrator.", '>>{AmericanFartBully} : >*Chomsky\'s misdirecting?* >"*...13 books, MIT professor, wrote the book on modern linguistics, and has been on a lecture circuit for over 50 years. Name any counterpoint to his* **intellect**" Well, good for him then; but, as I said, it\'s not his intellect or status that\'s a point of issue here. Nobodies\' really arguing that point. >*..Chomsky doesn\'t suggest anyone can\'t complain about Russian election hacking...*" Yeah, he kind of [does](https://chomsky.info/20170202/), actually, from how I read it. >*He states: What is the >world opinion< in regards to*" Then why say even that much if not to validate it.', '>>{AmericanFartBully} : >*the Islamic Republic isn\'t toppling governments around the world..*" Well, not all by themselves.', ">>{DeanBlandino} : You can think what you want but it doesn't change what people have discussed for hundreds of years. It's a legitimate codified discourse, and the opinion of some random internet dude doesn't change it.", '>>{foooood4thought} : With right-wing lunatics running the US.. how can you argue with Chomsky..? The US is simply not fit to be a superpower. The population is far, far, far, far too stupid and religious.', ">>{agrueeatedu} : This will be the case as long as we're the most powerful country on earth, then the dubious honor goes to whoever unseats us.", ">>{agrueeatedu} : More people are willing to listen to him when there's a republican in office. He said the same things about Obama, correctly I might add, but because the scale of the problem was less people weren't as willing to listen to him.", ">>{NoamChomskyIran} : The quote you refer to from Christopher Hitchens, who incidentally supported the Iraq war, was one of several hysterical responses by Hitchens when he didn't like how the fall out applied to him as Chomsky pointed out. Furthermore, Chomsky consistently raises the fact of American genocide accurately when talking about the origins of the U.S. Moreover he describes the U.S. as a complicated country, with many advantages and freedoms and a unique culture; which he thoroughly sees himself apart of. Chomsky does not see the U.S. as wholly a bad idea. Regardless, the issue of Iran being a threat is far less than say Muslim nuclear armed Pakistan for example. Stick to the topic of Iran. In what way is Chomsky not correct?", ">>{slakmehl} : > was one of several hysterical responses by Hitchens when he didn't like how the fall out applied to him as Chomsky pointed out. Yep, this is pretty typical for Chomsky and his acolytes. State the point, and if your opponent still disagrees it must be because he's stupid or evil. > Stick to the topic of Iran. In what way is Chomsky not correct? Chomsky is almost always right about every individual fact he cites. Like most people who find themselves at the frontier of opinion, he goes awry at the 'therefore'. It's true of Chomsky, Rand, Marx, and host of other similar (and similarly brilliant) figures.", ">>{NoamChomskyIran} : Noam Chomsky wasn't dragged out as mentioned above. He was asked an important question often brought up as he discussed. 'Why do people consider Iran the greatest threat to world peace, when the rest of the world agrees its the U.S?' It's relevant given Trump's travel ban, his wish to tare up a nuclear agreement, while also having his defence secretary reiterate the threat of Iran. - Chomsky cohesively stated why the fact are otherwise.", '>>{NoamChomskyIran} : That is not even close to the truth, if you bother to read his book comparing the massacres in East Timor with Cambodia in the late 1970s. The propaganda to discredit Chomsky reads as you said.', '>>{NoamChomskyIran} : Your right. The Vietnam war was the most destructive U.S. led war post WWII killing over 3 million people in an act of aggression.', '>>{NoamChomskyIran} : Kennedy was the primary culprit for the U.S. invasion of South Vietnam!', ">>{NoamChomskyIran} : It was Kennedy who invaded South Vietnam entirely against the will of the people, killing millions. Johnson escalated Kennedy's position until it list support of Big Business.", ">>{NoamChomskyIran} : Noam Chomsky exposed Christopher Hitchens for being a commissar of U.S. power in supporting the Afghan and Iraq invasion's. Hitchens didn't like how the conclusion's applied to himself, and thus resorted to hysterical statements against Chomsky, a man he actually spent some time defending right throughout the 1980s and early- mid 90s. The real reason, he agreed with Chomsky. Noam Chomsky himself both points out U.S. Crimes while espousing it's virtues of freedom and unique culture. The U.S. was indeed born of genocide through killing tens of millions of native American's, and now enjoys the rights of every other established state. This is not new or controversial, and does nothing to discredit Chomsky's important contributions in reminding the U.S. to look at how it acts. Does anyone remember Iraq and their weapons of mass destruction? Iran is a victim here and I'd suspect would like a peaceful resolution even if they were developing a deterrent, of which we do not know.", '>>{NoamChomskyIran} : Julian Assange told the truth. What a hideous crime! The U.S. killed millions and duped the public into wars. Saintly?', '>>{slakmehl} : Ah, got it, Hitchens was hysterical. Crazy, stupid, or evil, just like everyone who has ever disagreed with Chomsky.', ">>{NoamChomskyIran} : Not only was Hitchens hysterical when he tried to during and after entering debate with Chomsky (transcripts easily found on line), who was also wrong! Again, Hitchens didn't like how the conclusions he sided with applied to him. I suspect he knew it.", '>>{slakmehl} : Of course he knew it. He recognized Chomsky was far more intelligent and more correct than he could ever be, so his only option was to resort to subterfuge and villainy.', ">>{NoamChomskyIran} : You can read the Hitchens Chomsky on the internet. Two being Rejoinder to Noam Chomsky and Chomsky's follies. There were replies and counter replies. The essence was Hitchens was caught on the wrong side of reaction post 9 11 factually. It's important to note Hitchens was also a strong Chomsky supporter for a very long time. Near the end after finding himself off side he resorted to some rediculous discussion counter to his earlier years. Hitchens was a great intellect and man of letters. Only he could not out fact Chomsky who refuses to engage in positions that are not correct. So in his exchange with Hitchens, if you read closely you'll find that also the case.", ">>{DyedInkSun} : Not that it is going to convince a Noam Chomsky fan but ... >['A truth that's told with bad intent beats all the lies you can invent.' - Blake](https://np.reddit.com/r/ChristopherHitchens/comments/5m0jnk/wikileaks_and_julian_assange/?ref=search_posts) Turns out, Wikileaks only tells half the truth in many instances. Selective truths.", '>>{NoamChomskyIran} : How do you know that Wiki Leaks only tells half the truth? Can you elaborate further with reference to facts?']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{NoamChomskyIran} : Chomsky: U.S; not Iran, the greatest threat to world peace', ">>{kingsumo_1} : Is there anything that Chomsky has said in the last, hell who knows how long, that has not been against America? I'm pretty damn vocal on my stance about the big orange twat running the country and the GOP as a whole, but gods I am tired of people giving Chomsky the time of day.", ">>{slakmehl} : > Is there anything that Chomsky has said in the last, hell who knows how long, that has not been against America? No. I think Hitch said it best: Chomsky doesn't think the United States of America was a very good idea. It's all genocide back to columbus for him.", ">>{slakmehl} : He's a genius, but his schtick is using his intellect to defend mildly insane opinions. Maybe he thinks it would go to waste if his positions were merely true.", ">>{reid8470} : Did you watch the video? He cited polling of people from around the world and Defense analysis of military capability, not some opinion pulled out of thin air. Look at our political climate. We just elected Donald Trump on a platform of increased military spending, advocacy of war crimes, isolationism, ignorance of the threats climate change poses to global stability, etc. etc. etc. Consider that his critique of US foreign policy could very well be justified, especially when it's as volatile as our political climate.", '>>{DyedInkSun} : >Hitch said it best [here\'s the clip](https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4640289/christopher-hitchens-marx-new-left-sympathies-theocratic-nihilists) >"If you think the United States is a bad idea you may feel a sneaking sympathy for others who feel the same" Could apply that quote to all the Julian Assange groupies & Putin apologists as well.', ">>{Krakatoa12} : Sorry if reality intrudes but this has been the case since Lyndon Johnson was POTUS and put half a million troops into South Vietnam and god knows how much money spent on the whole debacle. Trump is indeed like many Americans. Hard to admit when you're wrong.", '>>{slakmehl} : Yep, some people are pre-programmed to hate whoever has the best weapons.', '>>{altuniverseyou} : Recently Chomsky said "You think we don\'t have killers? We\'re not so innocent." Oh wait, that was the republican president of the united states.', ">>{DeanBlandino} : Stop taking it personally. Philosophical history basically believes America is the product of Europe, but that America is the tool with which Europe is destroying itself and the world. If you don't believe in capitalism, how can you not blame America for being the exporter of capitalism around the globe? Capitalism = Armageddon for many in philosophy.", '>>{TheDaggestOfNabbits} : The irony is that your post is a whataboutism.', ">>{DeanBlandino} : Seriously. Americans say they love what America does for them and are frustrated about what it does wrong, but imagine how God damn *terrifying* America is to any other country? We fuck shit up wherever we want and never learn from our mistakes. Good intentions don't fly abroad, hypocrisy is a price paid in foreign lives. Can you imagine how much you would hate America if you were Iranian? We talk shit about your government while surrounding your country with military force and overthrew your democratic government FFS.", ">>{Huck77} : We blow up whatever we want and act like it is fine. What other country in the world could launch 59 missiles at another and then say with a straight face that it wasn't an act of war?", ">>{Huck77} : Isn't the birth and growth of the US pretty rife with genocide?", ">>{Huck77} : I am not familiar with the specific quote you are talking about, but is the whataboutism that you are referring to the mile long list of times that the US has deliberately interfered in another country's elections or toppled an elected government?", ">>{verbose_gent} : Is Chomsky getting more active lately? I feel like I'm hearing his name more and more.", ">>{slakmehl} : Not really. Andrew Jackson's treatment of the Indians was pretty horrific and comes close. Chomsky tends to focus more on interventions into other countries, like installing Pinochet in Chile.", ">>{DeanBlandino} : Seriously. We are so indignant over Putin- more or less- contributing excessive funds/resources to Trumps campaign. Our uneducated population is more to blame than Russia (not saying we shouldn't impeach him but let's be real here). That is business as usual for America abroad. Put this in perspective. We mistakenly believed Vietnam attacked us and it triggered a war that disfigured their country to this day. We made things up about Iraq and bombed then into oblivion because we were angry after 9/11. America is a bully that hates their smaller classmates for not liking us. It's pathetic.", '>>{captaindabbin} : It is probably because just about everything he has warned the US of during his career is coming to a head right now.', ">>{politicalanimalz} : Chomsky is the broken clock of wanna-be pundits. He said all the same things about Obama...and was wrong every time. Now that there really is a nut in charge of the US, he's finally right for a change.", '>>{prodigalpariah} : Is it really that insane to think the us runs roughshod over the rest of the planet?', ">>{kingsumo_1} : It's not personal, and not like I don't agree with a number of his criticisms. But for as long as I can remember that's all he's done. It wears thin after awhile. It's one of the reasons I hate people like Beck and Hannity (although far from the only with them). After beating on that same drum for so long, I'm just tired of even seeing the name show up. I think it's mostly that I fail to see his overall relevance at this point, or why people feel the need to put so much stock into what he has to say. Yes America is kind of fucked up and yes it's a monster of our own making. But find a new stance once in awhile. Maybe I'm just tired and cranky.", ">>{slakmehl} : No, and I did say 'mildly' insane. I would say his intimations that Bill Clinton was more evil than Saddam Hussein or Osama Bin Laden would qualify.", ">>{kingsumo_1} : I didn't say he was wrong or that I disagreed with him. I'm just tired of people dragging him out. It doesn't matter who's in charge or what we're doing, Chomski will find a reason to criticize it. It's not even so much about him as a person, is that people continue to try and keep him culturally relevant. I don't need his continued arguments to remind me of the shit show we're currently in.", '>>{antiquegeek} : You are just tired and cranky if you have a knee jerk reaction to seeing a name. Learn to learn without letting emotions and trained responses rule your life like a fucking whale at sea world.', ">>{slakmehl} : Don't take it personally. I view Chomsky in the same vein as Ayn Rand and Karl Marx. They are all wrong that everything is the fault of the poor, or the rich, or the government, or America. It would be wonderfully simple if the world were a perpetual 1943 with an obvious singular enemy of civilization, but that comes rarely.", ">>{kingsumo_1} : Heh. Fair enough. Given the reaction I seem to have elicited from an off hand comment, you're probably right.", ">>{verbose_gent} : It's not a comment, it's a question. I'm asking. Has he been?", ">>{Trump_carnage} : One huge difference, Johnson wasn't a narcissistic psychopath. Trump is.", ">>{ethical_consumer} : If you had an actual quote then maybe we could discuss it. But your biased interpretation of something he might have said isn't really grounds for discourse.", '>>{Viscount_Baron} : I think you may want to read up on Johnson. One word: "Jumbo".', ">>{AmericanFartBully} : No, it isn't. Because he's not really commenting on Russian hacking as much as Chomsky's misdirecting. After all, Chomsky's claim is the subject of the thread. So why wouldn't we otherwise speak to his credibility or relevance. Otherwise, why should we care what Chomsky thinks?", '>>{AmericanFartBully} : >*the mile long list of times that the US has deliberately interfered in another country\'s elections or toppled an elected government?*" So you\'e saying it\'s okay when other countries do it? Is that your argument?', ">>{HankPeppercorn} : Your ability to completely misinterpret someone here is actually impressive. This person was literally asking a question and you're accusing him of making a statement barely related. Good job.", '>>{ExcitableNate} : Johnson was definitely those things. He was, however, intelligent. Which Trumpy is not.', ">>{ExcitableNate} : I agree, though he is a good source. Just like anything else, you can't put all of your eggs in one basket. Chomsky is good for some things, not good for others.", ">>{admin-throw} : Chomsky's misdirecting? He's been pointing a laser at our empire and it's misdeeds for decades. Credibility? 13 books, MIT professor, wrote the book on modern linguistics, and has been on a lecture circuit for over 50 years. Name any counterpoint to his intellect that has a similar credibility. You might not agree with his middle east policy, but you are going to look like an idiot if you try to categorize him with the likes of Michael Moore or Ann Coulter. To address the post you defend... Chomsky doesn't suggest anyone can't complain about Russian election hacking, nor does he make any claim that peace with Russia is a bad thing. You need to be calling out those claims not the credibility of Chomsky. More importantly Chomsky doesn't even make the claim of this post's title. He states: What is the >world opinion< in regards to the greatest threat Iran or America, and cites Gallup poles that come back with the answer: America.", ">>{dberis} : It's too late, Noam. You're already irrelevant.", '>>{GetEquipped} : Johnson also had sympathy. [Here he is; crying after listening to his son-in-law tells him about the conditions in Vietnam](https://seanmunger.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/johnson-anguish-picture.jpg?w=940) LBJ\'s son-in-law was Capt. Charles Robb who was involved in operations. The tape recorder on the desk is playing back his briefing. Also, when LBJ signed the Civil rights act in 1964, he said: “I think we just delivered the South to the Republican Party for a long time to come." He knew politics, he knew how to play the game. There\'s a lot of photos of him invading people\'s personal space to make the other person feel uncomfortable or to seem intimidating to get his way ([Here\'s one](https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/2014/03/0414_BOB_Odonnell_CivilRights_Russell_V1/lead_large.jpg) ) But he didn\'t try to run the country into the ground for personal gains.', '>>{cantstopthecrabs} : A lot of people outside America hate America. Source: Not American and lived in many non-American countries.', '>>{DrDaniels} : America needs to act in a way where other countries can look at us and think "Those are the good guys" The 9/11 Commission Report spelled it out that we gain allies and fight extremism by emulating positive values of liberty. This also means that we can\'t bomb whomever or support rebels or dictators around the world. America\'s actions around the globe affect our reputation very heavily which is why much of South America and the Middle East is very critical of American foreign policy. The CIA had a term called blowback that they came up with over 50 years ago yet it seems we still haven\'t learned to examine the consequences of our foreign policy. Iran is a state sponsor of terror and dangerous but the Islamic Republic isn\'t toppling governments around the world, though that\'s not due to lack of trying.', ">>{SuburbanDinosaur} : So what you're saying is that he's right and you generally agree with him, but you don't think he's relevant. How does that make any sense? If you're correct in your analysis, you're relevant.", ">>{SeenItAllHeardItAll} : His argument is that Iran has been spending not so much on military than others in the region and their strategy is defensive. Chomsky's claim can be backed up by the last 3 decades of Iran's behavior. One caveat may be the Iranian Revolutionary Guard which operates a rouge strategy somewhat independent of the state. There is a huge problem with the US Iran strategy. By declaring Iran an enemy the US looses the ability to influence Iran, drove it to and encourages it maintain its embrace of Russia. The outcome is the mess the US is facing in Syria where Russia and Iran are major players on which the US lacks influence.", ">>{GabrielJones} : Whether or not one agrees with Chomsky we need to be open to the things the US, or the West in general, does wrong. Our civilisation needs to be judged along with every other country and civilisation as part of being honest about ourselves and starting to do things differently. My favourite source of wisdom, Lahotar, puts it starkly: 'Oneness means peace,upliftment,equality,mercy. Not war,invasion,greed,drone strikes. USA has caused most damage in 5000 years,who can argue?' 'What’s civilised standards? Bailouts invasions drone strikes low wages low taxes for rich austerity for poor. Still want to be civilised?' 'Strange people these americans. They talk much of freedom n democracy. Then give us snooping drones invasions money printing n insecurity.' [http://www.lahotar.com] My position is not anti-US, it's that we need to accept every valid stat on what we are doing wrong, and allow activists such as Chomsky to have their say. At the very least we need to build a position where we have a clear moral authority in the world, and sadly we seem to be heading in the opposite direction.", '>>{redditorandcheef} : Chomsky is American, you can criticize something and be against it.', '>>{Sangriafrog} : That sounds like something that could have been said by Chomsky though.', ">>{lolpokpok} : Huge difference? I don't think the people on the receiving end of american aggression have ever cared about your presidents psychological condition.", '>>{doncajon} : And some people have ample reason to love what America has done for them. Hallo from Germany. And some people have reason to hate Chomsky, like the victims of the Red Khmer genocide, which he denied because of his lifelong anti-western obsession.', '>>{DeanBlandino} : Holy fuck did you just compare Karl Marx to Ayn Rand? You must not know anything about either, especially in terms of their value to philosophy..', ">>{McG4rn4gle} : That's a very powerful picture that I'd never seen before - heavy weighs the crown.", ">>{DeanBlandino} : Being a philosopher is not about taking a new stance. It's about developing a way of thinking and applying it to what's happening to help people understand the world around them. From his perspective- and it's historically valid- America is a bad actor in the world.", ">>{DeanBlandino} : If you believe the west is on a march toward Armageddon, what's the point at which you draw the lines in revolution? Capitalism produces global warming for example which will million millions and millions if not billions. These people are looking at a very big picture.", ">>{GetEquipped} : There are aides who worked with LBJ when he increased presence in Vietnam, he would listen/read to the list of casualties by himself in the Oval office to realize how many Americans were dying over there. He was so unsure about American commitment, he asked General and Former president Eisenhower if it was the right thing to do. Knowing that the Vietnam war would be his downfall, he instead did his best to push through other legislation, including Medicare, the Voting Rights Act, Gun control regulations, and reform on immigration (Although he had a different stance on the last one when he was a Senator 10 years prior) Like, the guy was an asshole. He had this very imposing presence and a tough guy routine, but it was a routine. I think he had to live up to Kennedy's promises, as well as deal with the Civil rights movement and escalating conflicts.", '>>{slakmehl} : Read both. Marx is better, but same search for a simplistic prescription for societies woes.', '>>{doncajon} : In what way is capitalism the deciding factor in whether you cause global warming?', '>>{DeanBlandino} : Ok then you read it without understanding it. There was nothing simplistic about what he was saying.', ">>{DeanBlandino} : The same way it is viewed as foundational to nuclear war. Basically we have no way of stopping. Destruction of the environment is foundational to any capitalist society. In fact this was much more widely discussed 100 years ago with the likes of Teddy Roosevelt (created vast majority of federal lands to protect things like Grand Canyon and maintain access). Heidegger chose the Nazis because he thought they could save the planet. Capitalism's insatiable desire for growth means we cannot stop, we cannot avoid discovering something, persuing something. It's a fragmented, fractured form of consciousness.", ">>{slakmehl} : You know you can say that without being personally insulting, right? He's a brilliant guy. So is Ayn Rand, for that matter. Chomsky is a certified genius. For all three of them, their *defenses* of their simplistic worldviews are themselves complex, and necessarily so. There is a reason Marxist economists are virtually extinct.", ">>{DeanBlandino} : I wasn't personally insulting. You just have no idea what you're talking about. Karl Marx is foundational. The guy is so much more important and impressive than Ayn Rand it's laughable to compare them. Hell, comparing Chomsky to Marx is laughable. Marx had a concept for describing the mechanics of an entire contemporary society, and it was so well done that people remain unable to move past his work nearly 150 years later. Calling it simplistic is so unbelievably ignorant. He's one of the greatest thinkers of human history lol", ">>{slakmehl} : Only familiar with Chomsky's political work, I'm guessing? Hard to argue his scientific work compares disfavorably with Marx. Edit: [this alone](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chomsky_hierarchy) blows away Marx's entire career, in my personal opinion.", '>>{bluekeyspew} : We use our military power to support our large businesses. We use our military power to support corrupt governments that support our corporations.', '>>{cats_catz_kats_katz} : What does that even have to do with what Chomsky was talking about? Literally, nothing.', ">>{doncajon} : The closest we ever got to nuclear war was when the Soviets were shipping nuclear missiles to Cuba in 1962. Since communism fell in Russia and since China abandoned it in all but its name, the risk should have gone up, according to you. I don't think that's the case though. I also don't think that communism or any other non-capitalist system I can think of lacked the hunger for growth, they merely lacked the ability and had to keep entire nations from defecting with iron curtains, while producing millions of casualties during the Holodomor, the Great Leap Forward and all those 5 year plans that would always end up producing too much and too little of what was actually needed.", ">>{MiniatureBadger} : He denied the Cambodian Genocide for decades, only admitting that it actually happened to a significant extent in 1993. He doesn't deny it now, but he was a genocide denialist for as long as he could be one just because he supported the ideology of the perpretrator.", '>>{AmericanFartBully} : >*Chomsky\'s misdirecting?* >"*...13 books, MIT professor, wrote the book on modern linguistics, and has been on a lecture circuit for over 50 years. Name any counterpoint to his* **intellect**" Well, good for him then; but, as I said, it\'s not his intellect or status that\'s a point of issue here. Nobodies\' really arguing that point. >*..Chomsky doesn\'t suggest anyone can\'t complain about Russian election hacking...*" Yeah, he kind of [does](https://chomsky.info/20170202/), actually, from how I read it. >*He states: What is the >world opinion< in regards to*" Then why say even that much if not to validate it.', '>>{AmericanFartBully} : >*the Islamic Republic isn\'t toppling governments around the world..*" Well, not all by themselves.', ">>{DeanBlandino} : You can think what you want but it doesn't change what people have discussed for hundreds of years. It's a legitimate codified discourse, and the opinion of some random internet dude doesn't change it.", '>>{foooood4thought} : With right-wing lunatics running the US.. how can you argue with Chomsky..? The US is simply not fit to be a superpower. The population is far, far, far, far too stupid and religious.', ">>{agrueeatedu} : This will be the case as long as we're the most powerful country on earth, then the dubious honor goes to whoever unseats us.", ">>{agrueeatedu} : More people are willing to listen to him when there's a republican in office. He said the same things about Obama, correctly I might add, but because the scale of the problem was less people weren't as willing to listen to him.", ">>{NoamChomskyIran} : The quote you refer to from Christopher Hitchens, who incidentally supported the Iraq war, was one of several hysterical responses by Hitchens when he didn't like how the fall out applied to him as Chomsky pointed out. Furthermore, Chomsky consistently raises the fact of American genocide accurately when talking about the origins of the U.S. Moreover he describes the U.S. as a complicated country, with many advantages and freedoms and a unique culture; which he thoroughly sees himself apart of. Chomsky does not see the U.S. as wholly a bad idea. Regardless, the issue of Iran being a threat is far less than say Muslim nuclear armed Pakistan for example. Stick to the topic of Iran. In what way is Chomsky not correct?", ">>{slakmehl} : > was one of several hysterical responses by Hitchens when he didn't like how the fall out applied to him as Chomsky pointed out. Yep, this is pretty typical for Chomsky and his acolytes. State the point, and if your opponent still disagrees it must be because he's stupid or evil. > Stick to the topic of Iran. In what way is Chomsky not correct? Chomsky is almost always right about every individual fact he cites. Like most people who find themselves at the frontier of opinion, he goes awry at the 'therefore'. It's true of Chomsky, Rand, Marx, and host of other similar (and similarly brilliant) figures.", ">>{NoamChomskyIran} : Noam Chomsky wasn't dragged out as mentioned above. He was asked an important question often brought up as he discussed. 'Why do people consider Iran the greatest threat to world peace, when the rest of the world agrees its the U.S?' It's relevant given Trump's travel ban, his wish to tare up a nuclear agreement, while also having his defence secretary reiterate the threat of Iran. - Chomsky cohesively stated why the fact are otherwise.", '>>{NoamChomskyIran} : That is not even close to the truth, if you bother to read his book comparing the massacres in East Timor with Cambodia in the late 1970s. The propaganda to discredit Chomsky reads as you said.', '>>{NoamChomskyIran} : Your right. The Vietnam war was the most destructive U.S. led war post WWII killing over 3 million people in an act of aggression.', '>>{NoamChomskyIran} : Kennedy was the primary culprit for the U.S. invasion of South Vietnam!', ">>{NoamChomskyIran} : It was Kennedy who invaded South Vietnam entirely against the will of the people, killing millions. Johnson escalated Kennedy's position until it list support of Big Business.", ">>{NoamChomskyIran} : Noam Chomsky exposed Christopher Hitchens for being a commissar of U.S. power in supporting the Afghan and Iraq invasion's. Hitchens didn't like how the conclusion's applied to himself, and thus resorted to hysterical statements against Chomsky, a man he actually spent some time defending right throughout the 1980s and early- mid 90s. The real reason, he agreed with Chomsky. Noam Chomsky himself both points out U.S. Crimes while espousing it's virtues of freedom and unique culture. The U.S. was indeed born of genocide through killing tens of millions of native American's, and now enjoys the rights of every other established state. This is not new or controversial, and does nothing to discredit Chomsky's important contributions in reminding the U.S. to look at how it acts. Does anyone remember Iraq and their weapons of mass destruction? Iran is a victim here and I'd suspect would like a peaceful resolution even if they were developing a deterrent, of which we do not know.", '>>{NoamChomskyIran} : Julian Assange told the truth. What a hideous crime! The U.S. killed millions and duped the public into wars. Saintly?', '>>{slakmehl} : Ah, got it, Hitchens was hysterical. Crazy, stupid, or evil, just like everyone who has ever disagreed with Chomsky.', ">>{NoamChomskyIran} : Not only was Hitchens hysterical when he tried to during and after entering debate with Chomsky (transcripts easily found on line), who was also wrong! Again, Hitchens didn't like how the conclusions he sided with applied to him. I suspect he knew it.", '>>{slakmehl} : Of course he knew it. He recognized Chomsky was far more intelligent and more correct than he could ever be, so his only option was to resort to subterfuge and villainy.', ">>{NoamChomskyIran} : You can read the Hitchens Chomsky on the internet. Two being Rejoinder to Noam Chomsky and Chomsky's follies. There were replies and counter replies. The essence was Hitchens was caught on the wrong side of reaction post 9 11 factually. It's important to note Hitchens was also a strong Chomsky supporter for a very long time. Near the end after finding himself off side he resorted to some rediculous discussion counter to his earlier years. Hitchens was a great intellect and man of letters. Only he could not out fact Chomsky who refuses to engage in positions that are not correct. So in his exchange with Hitchens, if you read closely you'll find that also the case.", ">>{DyedInkSun} : Not that it is going to convince a Noam Chomsky fan but ... >['A truth that's told with bad intent beats all the lies you can invent.' - Blake](https://np.reddit.com/r/ChristopherHitchens/comments/5m0jnk/wikileaks_and_julian_assange/?ref=search_posts) Turns out, Wikileaks only tells half the truth in many instances. Selective truths.", '>>{NoamChomskyIran} : How do you know that Wiki Leaks only tells half the truth? Can you elaborate further with reference to facts?'], ['>>{truthhurts4444} : Rape is a crime, not a culture. "Rape culture" is a myth invented by feminists who somehow believe that listening to Blurred Lines by Robin Thicke will make men go on a rape rampage', '>>{75000_Tokkul} : [So are his supporters at this very moment.](https://np.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/search?q=Pussy&restrict_sr=on&sort=new&t=all)', '>>{75000_Tokkul} : A libertarian being able to win the presidency is not a thing. That is the standard of "not a thing" this election. The rape culture as shown by Trump\'s comments and is supporters claiming that\'s just how men are shows how rape culture **is a thing** in America.', '>>{UvonTheDeplorable} : Rape culture, hate culture. The guy is truely deplorable', '>>{Jetstar64} : The more something seems like it\'s a part of the "norm" the more it will be.', '>>{DrDaniels} : I always have low expectations of /r/The_Deplorables and yet somehow they still manage to disappoint each time.', '>>{truthhurts4444} : Being a rape victim is trendy and popular. There is no faster way for a woman to gain sympathy and attention then for her to say she was raped. Now "girl who cried rape" is the new "boy who cried wolf" The fabrication of "rape culture" has occurred concurrently with the rise of rape victimhood celebration. Coincidence? I think not.', ">>{75000_Tokkul} : Did you know their current top mod can't even vote for Trump because they are a well known racist Danish Redditor? Did you know their most popular ex-top mod created /r/altright until he was removed from there for having Jewish blood? They always have a new way to disappoint.", '>>{Boxy310} : >rape culture is not a thing >"I just grab \'em by the pussy... I don\'t even wait... You can do anything if you\'re a star" >that was just locker room banter! >Bill Clinton did it, so it\'s okay >all right, /r/the_safespace, who\'s ready to grab America by the pussy! k', '>>{Patello} : Shh, "rape culture" is a trigger word for /r/the_dumpster. The kids are still sleeping, don\'t wake them up.', '>>{PozMyNeghole} : Bill Clinton raped many people and Hillary attacked his victims and ruined their lives though. If liberals didn\'t want "rape culture" on their hands they shouldn\'t have deregulated the sexual market place by attacking and undermining marriage as much as they can. This Hellish world they\'ve wrought into being is entirely on them.', '>>{anarchism4thewin} : Yes? What does that have to do with my comment?', '>>{75000_Tokkul} : I get the feeling you are going to be repeating that on the stand after being charged with rape sooner rather than later.', '>>{Boxy310} : OK, "truth hurts". Good luck rebuilding the Republican party. I\'m sure you\'ll do fine with that attitude.', '>>{Patello} : Why are you disappointed? With all the popcorn I eat while browsing there, I am gonna be able to hibernate for the whole winter.', '>>{lasershurt} : This is the most interesting contrast to the "THERE IS NO SUCH THING" comments that are already flooding in. There is a huge group of people acting like advocating sexual assault is no big deal, it\'s "just how men are." Normalizing the idea of sexual predation is the very crux of "rape culture."', '>>{bitterbut_true} : Hillary has \'launched\' the GENDER WAR. She says in a tweet: "Women have the power to stop Trump". So that\'s it then? Men vs Women? By using Trump\'s normal male \'sex drive\' to destroy him, Hillary has also \'let the cat out of the bag\'. She is showing that a society\'s power struggle is not solely a class struggle (between rich \'n poor). It\'s also a gender struggle between males and females. \'Pussy\' has value and even \'property rights\'--just like a block of flats.', '>>{ilikeyoohoo} : It\'s not that complicated. We live in a culture that accepts many, beliefs, attitudes and actions that make men more likely to commit rape or acts of violence against women. Not so much that it\'s celebrated, but men look the other way, dismiss or minimize it. I don\'t like the phrase "rape culture" either, but it does exist.', ">>{Boxy310} : K. I'm sure that's the exact talking points you need to rebuild after that fiasco. Why don't you say that as publicly and as many times as you can? I'm sure that'll work out great.", ">>{Boxy310} : Say, /u/anarchism4thewin, what are your opinions on the police and legal system to prosecute people who are, say, serial rapists? I'm sure you have a wealth of well-reasoned legal arguments about deterring rapes.", '>>{DrDaniels} : Wait, the creator of /r/altright got removed for havinf Jewish blood? Holy shit, who was that and when did that happen?', '>>{Donald_2016} : This recording has changed my views on the US having a rape culture.', ">>{75000_Tokkul} : [Here is a bit of them talking about it.](https://np.reddit.com/r/altright/comments/51a14r/im_stepping_down_as_moderator/d7agbh1) The deleted user is ciswhitemaelstrom's account.", ">>{FullClockworkOddessy} : It's just a desperate deplorable grasping for a way that Clinton is the person who's political career is deader than zydeco. Pay him no heed. They are the ramblings of a dying madman.", '>>{FullClockworkOddessy} : Well you could look at your own fellow deplorables for one.', '>>{kittykat713} : Brock Turner getting 6 months in jail for assaulting a sleeping woman, because a harsher sentence would negatively affect his future.', '>>{anarchism4thewin} : That was not an unreasonable punishment for a first time offender.', '>>{John_Frum_} : They are an offshoot of redpill. What exactly did people expect them to believe about consent?', ">>{Boxy310} : How can I tell you're not a dog? It is the internet, after all.", ">>{DrDaniels} : Wasn't he doxed, and he ended up being a teenager?", '>>{75000_Tokkul} : His claim is that he was a law student and mentioned modding the place to a fellow student. Out of fear he would get expelled from school he deleted his account. Considering all the openly pro-rape comments, hate speech, and harassment he did on that account I could see him being worried if he did it using campus internet being punished. He also claimed he could t handle college and was going to use his Reddit modding to get a job.....somehow.', ">>{75000_Tokkul} : I mod /r/againsthatesubreddits. I am disappointed because no matter how many rules they break, harassment they cause, and hate speech they post the admins won't take real action. Their defense is their subreddit name just like how the /r/European Nazis got away with so much, which the admins let just move to /r/uncensorednews as their new home after.", ">>{ilikeyoohoo} : 1. The statements Trump made that spurred this article. If he weren't a presidential candidate, no one would think much of it because it would be considered typical locker room talk. 2. The idea that if you get a woman drunk it's easier to fuck them is sometimes taken to extremes. Sometimes women choose to drink a lot and that's fine (so do men). But, they're often pressured or coerced to drink more than they normally would too, either directly, or women drink free keg parties at college campuses, no cover charge for women at clubs, stuff like that. 3. The belief that women must be submissive. This applies to sex and abusive relationships. 4. Blaming women for getting drunk or dressing sexy as the cause of their sexual assault, completely cutting out the actions of the perpetrator. It's just *expected* that men will act that way. 5. The idea that women have no value other than for sexual gratification. There's much more. But, that's all I got for now.", '>>{kittykat713} : 6 months in jail is not unreasonable for sexually assaulting an unconscious woman? And if you were sexually assaulted by someone while you were sleeping, would you feel the same way?', ">>{Patello} : I think one of the main problems is that these are people that feed off of suppression. These are not people who have learned about action and consequences. Just look at how much they scream about posts being removed from /r/politics even though they were in violation of the rules. It doesn't matter to them if they break the rules or not, they are still going to go around crying censorship to anyone and everyone. While not ideal, I think having them contained in their own hateful corner of the Internet is the best we can hope for. And while they leach out sometime, if td would be removed, they would just spew their hate in other subs.", ">>{75000_Tokkul} : >I think having them contained in their own hateful corner of the Internet is the best we can hope for. That is the whole point of a quarantine. They get get to have their space they just don't appear on /r/all and searches on Reddit.", ">>{Patello} : But if they know they are being quarantined, I think they would be more likely to brigade over subs to get their message across. I know it sounds like letting the terrorizers win, and in some sense it is, but I just don't see a realistic solution", '>>{75000_Tokkul} : You could say the same about coontown or fatpeoplehate but after they had their fit they mostly moved off site. A large group just move to voat and 4chan/8chan to be with their own kind. If the admins were willing to actually take action and hire even just one person to remove those places they congregate they could remove places like /r/publichealthwatch, /r/incelabode, /r/coontown, /r/European, and /r/the_donald for good. Certain Reddit communities already find and list the public ones already making finding them easy. Give feedback by actually dealing with what is found will only make redditors more motivated to find them too. Many of them admit they want a nonquarantined subreddit only so they can link people to it filled with their hate. They want to spread their message around the site not have their own corner to post it.'], [">>{BlankVerse} : Clinton: Trump can't 'speak of protecting Syrian babies' while pushing a ban of refugees", '>>{mcndjxlefnd} : Hillary, please go back into your evil lair. We are done with your political input.', ">>{Mr_Billy} : Just because we try to protect some doesn't mean we end up adopting them. Otherwise all policemen houses would also be overrun. Go back to the woods Hilary.", ">>{SchooledGaming} : She's not wrong. The hypocrisy is never ending...", ">>{clone822} : Sure he can. Doesn't even have to be Syrian babies. We're pushing a pro-life position while cutting WIC.", ">>{probablyuntrue} : Trump cares so much about they he'll drop a 1.4 mil dollar bomb on their head!", ">>{rogerpool123} : I love that Hillary is planning out Trump's Syrian policy. And the Trump supporters hate it.LOL", ">>{SKINMASK2016} : Why not? He never claimed that every refugee was bad or even dangerous, just that enough of them are threats to US citizens to make the whole process not worth it. Syrian and surrounding region safe zones have been spoken of for years now, who's to say Trump can't go that route? That's what Syrians want... https://youtu.be/s3uaf1NFxXc", ">>{Brad_tilf} : Why won't Clinton just shut the fuck up? Retire and go away.", '>>{chasjo} : Whenever a controversial event occurs, I know my first reaction is what does someone incompetent enough to lose an election to Donald Trump think about this? Lucky for me it looks like the national\u200b media is determined to keep quoting this person who is too delusional to understand her own shortcomings every damn time something happens.', '>>{TryAndFindmeLine} : Yes, because half of the country voted for this genius: >>HIATT: So what do you think China’s aims are in the South China Sea? >TRUMP: Well I know China very well, because I deal with China all the time. I’ve done very well. China’s unbelievably ambitious. China is, uh… I mean, when I deal with China, you know, I have the Bank of America building, I’ve done some great deals with China. I do deals with them all the time on, you know, selling apartments, and, you know, people say ‘oh that’s not the same thing.’ The level of… uh, the largest bank in the world, 400 million customers, is a tenant of mine in New York, in Manhattan. The biggest bank in China. The biggest bank in the world. Anyone who thought *that* guy was fit to be anything more than the town dogcatcher seriously needs their head examined.', ">>{mcndjxlefnd} : Exactly why. She's a loser of epic proportions.", '>>{TryAndFindmeLine} : Only because 60 million Americans are dumb as hammered shit.', '>>{potatojoe88} : Why do you care so much whether or not she says things?', ">>{red-light} : The fact that Clinton came out in support for these strikes dealt a huge blow to trump's more rabid supporters. She finally did something right, even if it was unintentional.", '>>{mcndjxlefnd} : That explanation is a cop-out. I would argue that the Americans who voted against Hillary are smarter than the ones who voted *for* her (as opposed to against Trump).', '>>{Eva-Unit-001} : Someone should hire her to just follow Donny around and agree with everything he does.', ">>{SchooledGaming} : Who said we shouldn't bomb Syria. Are you aware of a straw man?", '>>{YgramulTheMany} : She probably would have had some involvement in Syria, but she would not have banned Syrian children from finding a place of refuge in our country.', '>>{FNSam} : The "refugees" she and Obama helped create?', ">>{Brad_tilf} : Because she isn't helping. She literally should not even be part of the discussion any more. She had her shot. Her history, along with some help from the FBI made her lose. It's time to retire and let someone else be involved.", '>>{nightandshade} : Sure he can. Hypocrites do that shit all the time!', '>>{nightandshade} : Oh yeah. Who knows how many more people could have been murdered by her satanic pedophile email server from that pizza place in Benghazi had she been elected??', ">>{EditorialComplex} : Here's the thing. Yeah, she probably would have carried out these strikes. But she would have had a coherent foreign policy surrounding them. There would have been diplomatic pressure on Assad. She wouldn't gave given him the green light like Tillerson did last week. She would have had concrete goals. With her, we would have known that it was keeping with her worldview and mindset, which believes that American military force should be used to prevent humanitarian catastrophes, like what Bill did in Kosovo. Sure, you can call her a hawk for it, but it's an ethos that she sticks to. With Donald, we have no idea. He suddenly reversed everything he's been saying since 2013. Was he overwhelmed with grief for the kids? Was he looking to appear strong after months of seeming weak and incompetent, with his poll numbers flagging? Did he want to try and undermine Russia accusations? It could be any of these. We don't know.", '>>{rogerpool123} : My comment was more of a slur on stupid Trump supporters being conned by the slob, they have no idea. And there is no way Trump has any say in what happens in Syria or Iran or NK, the war mongering Republicans are acting on plans they have had for years and there aint no stopping them.', ">>{bearrosaurus} : I don't get your joke here. Do you think children getting gassed by nerve agents is funny?", '>>{montereybay} : At this point, the news media shouldn\'t even report on what Trump said unless it is verified to be true. Otherwise they should just say "Trump lied again today." Passing on his message is exactly what he wants.', '>>{okayokaysure} : She is way too smart for this to have been unintentional.', ">>{chingazo} : Sure he can. He doesn't have a problem with the babies. It's the baby's parents he's concerned about.", ">>{landragon} : Remember that no fly zone she proposed? Those jets wouldn't have been flying at all", '>>{drdawwg} : This time coming out for the thing trump did hours before he did it actually helps trump lose his base because it connects their precious Donald with their most hated politician.', ">>{scobot} : I hate trump as much as the next sane citizen. The only reason he got elected is because Clinton is awful and plenty of people voted *against* her. I can't think of anything that would help Trump more than Clinton getting back on the public stage.", ">>{Joegotbored} : Trump seemed so concerned about those gassed babies and children, is generally forgetting that we don't know their parents and what they've been up to to? Cause that was his explanation for not wanting refugee families", ">>{Brad_tilf} : Just the fact that alot of Dems support it would have done that anyway. Hell, I vote Dem and I'm not happy about this development at all."]]

classify and reply

['>>{Katyusha41} : Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner on path to “criminal prosecution,” ethics experts warn', '>>{jsdow640} : Oh poor old Chelsea has lived a really hard life...', '>>{Amy75892} : The Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 does hybrid right video', '>>{wytxcook} : > Chelsea Clinton also said she was baffled by her mother\'s low trustworthiness ratings in polls. "They make no sense to me," she said. "There is no one I trust more than my mom." Oh well bless your heart.', '>>{Samhoustoneggers} : It\'s really not a hard question when you pay the littlest amount of attention to the "details" of trumps plan, and the details of hillary\'s.', '>>{Alexir563} : As I scrolled I totally thought this was a Surface', '>>{Argue-With-Strangers} : While there is disagreement who is worse: 1) Both are shit. 2) Both are shitty people. 3) Both have shitty policies. 4) Both have done shitty things. 5) Both will continue to do shitty things. 6) Neither should be be allowed to lead anyone, anywhere, in anyway, for any reason, at anytime, under any circumstances.', '>>{Chronoallusion} : I think you have hit the shitty nail in the shitty coffin.', '>>{BeowulfShaeffer} : Any headline with "slams" in it should be downvotes to oblivion.', ">>{Dipsquat} : I can't believe I almost waited through an Ad, just to watch an Ad...", '>>{el-toro-loco} : *You can pick between getting shot or stabbed.* "Can I pick a hug?" *Yes, but it won\'t happen. You will be shot or stabbed.* "Then shoot me or stab me, but I want it to go on the record that I chose a hug."', '>>{tangibleadhd} : Hillary Clinton >Nearly half of Americans who dislike Clinton say she can’t be trusted and listed it as one of their biggest concerns. More than a third said she is corrupt. And 21 percent said her positions change with political winds, which seems a corollary to the trustworthiness question. But very few of her detractors say she’s unqualified, or that she doesn’t know enough about the issues. And practically no one believes she is a racist. Donald Trump >While the New York billionaire doesn’t have to navigate the colossal icebergs of dislike that afflict Clinton, his faults are arguably worse. A quarter of his detractors said racism is his biggest flaw; that figure jumps to 35 percent for Hispanic voters and 40 percent for black voters. Another 20 percent said Trump doesn’t have the right kind of experience to be president, a reason largely cited by older voters. Age also accounted for differences in other areas of the survey. Retirees, for example, were half as likely to name sexism as one of their top gripes with Trump and three times more likely than their youngest counterparts to say Clinton is too liberal. And voters who came of age during Bill Clinton’s presidency are the most likely to say Hillary Clinton is “too divisive.” In conclusion: >But here’s the study’s biggest flaw: By definition, it doesn’t break new ground. **By giving respondents a menu of well-known complaints against candidates and asking them to pick two, the survey narrows itself to poll-tested smears most Americans already know about.** While open-ended questions are tougher to poll, they can yield better insights. That’s to say it would have been interesting to see what unprompted voters had to say.', ">>{SALTED_MEAT} : Eh, you know, she probably has. There are different kinds of hard. When she was like 13 years old half of the country wouldn't stop talking about how ugly she was.", '>>{Scarbane} : I abstain from being shot or stabbed.', ">>{Omnibrad} : Their relatives bomb the shit out of each other, so what's so wrong with the US bombing them too? /s", '>>{Katyusha41} : >Richard Painter, Norman Eisen, and Virginia Canter of the group Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW) note that if Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump use their White House roles to enrich themselves, it “may expose the couple to criminal prosecution, and the White House and all of us to more Trump scandal.”', ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : Why is it misogynistic and sexist to say that Hillary doesn't have a presidential look?", '>>{JerseyWabbit} : Is this supposed to make a Hillary (who is supposed to be so tough) a victim, and sympathetic to women voters?', '>>{losotr} : Is that the biggest dimple ever or is it just dented in from being punched in the same spot so many times?', ">>{NerdHavoc} : Everyone is concerned about Hybrid Right and I'm just like WTF kind of name is Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12?", ">>{JoeMobley} : Your videos will start after this advertisement. Nope! 3 seconds and I'm out'ta-there.", ">>{Zykium} : Well I'd hope you trust your mother Chelsea but she didn't raise the rest of us. I'll write the Breitbart headline though > Does Chelsea Clinton not trust her father?", ">>{otaschon} : Alpha is great though, it's much cheaper than surface, does come with keyboard and has no fans. I am using it for second month as my daily driver and can't go back to regular laptop even I hated detachables so hard", ">>{Omnibrad} : Trump is both a shot and stab wound. Hillary...is different. The best analogy I can think of is cancer: it won't be fast, but by the end you will wish it was. EDIT - You'll get lots of hugs with cancer though, just not until after your hair falls out and you're shitting the bed.", ">>{morbidexpression} : I am loving whenever Richard Painter comes on TV, pissed off like you wouldn't believe....", '>>{FLRSH} : The thing with folks not thinking she\'s racist, is she\'s definitely had her flings with racism. See, super predators comment or the CP time joke. And her policies certainly disproportionately harm POC. Such as the 94 crime bill leading to a massive percentage of Black and Latino youth being over-incarcerated, her support for the death penalty which is often racially applied, and marijuana enforcement being hardest on POC, which Hillary opposes legalizing. And on the immigration front, she is against giving driver\'s licenses to undocumented migrants, is for a barrier along Mexico which is both a "fence" and a "wall" in places, and is down for turning away children refugees at our borders to make a point instead of granting them amnesty. She implements or supports a lot of policy that\'s racially charged without often saying racist things. Her career is Trump\'s words in action, just tempered to placate the public.', ">>{ovrwrtch_} : Well yeah they're kind of running the country and meeting foreign leaders on our behalf, while profiting immensely all while being elected and confirmed by no one. I hope they all go down I really do.", '>>{Kabuki_Writer} : Been coming here for 5 years. If it gets much cheesier I am going to find another place.', ">>{like_ya_do} : The worst part is that you don't know where you'll get shot or stabbed. Maybe you'd rather be stabbed, but the stabber stabs you in the temple, and then the shooter shoots someone's toe. You're dead but the other guy just has a limp. Or maybe you'd rather be shot and the shooter shoots you in the eye. Meanwhile the stabber gets someone's earlobe. It's impossible to say one is worse than the other because there are no clear guidelines for how and where you'll be shot or stabbed.", '>>{like_ya_do} : This doesn\'t even include superpredators, reports that she\'s called Jesse Jackson the n-word or that she\'s frequently reported as being demeaning of people off camera. It also excludes how she treated the BLM activist ("Back to the issues that *I* think matter ") and the young woman who asked her at a book signing how she would help improve diversity in elected offices ("Why don\'t *you* run for something then?"). She\'s unkind in general; I don\'t know why anyone would believe her appeals to minorities are anything but pandering.', '>>{egg_for_your_trouble} : This Carlin quote really appeals to me. "Everybody complains about politicians. Everybody says, “They suck”. But where do people think these politicians come from? They don’t fall out of the sky. They don’t pass through a membrane from another reality. No, they come from American homes, American families, American schools, American churches, American businesses, and they’re elected by American\xa0voters.Thisis the best we can do, folks. It’s what our system produces: Garbage in, garbage out. ….I have solved this political dilemma in a very direct way: I don’t vote. On Election Day, I stay home. I firmly believe that if you vote, you have no right to complain. Now, some people like to twist that around. They say, “If you don’t vote, you have no right to complain”, but where’s the logic in that? If you vote, and you elect dishonest, incompetent politicians, and they get into office and screw everything up, you are responsible for what they have done. You voted them in. You caused the problem. You have no right to complain. I, on the other hand, who did not vote — who did not even leave the house on Election Day — am in no way responsible for that these politicians have done and have every right to complain about the mess that you created. That I didn’t have anything to do with. So when you’re having one of those swell elections that you like so much…on that day I will be doing essentially the same as you…the only difference is when I get done masturbating I’ll have a little something to show for it."', '>>{BiffySkipwell} : sort of...ShareBlue is under the ownership of MediaMatters but Brock isnt a direct contributor to content. While they Willis/T. Christopher have some good points to make their insatiable need to drive traffic with hyperbolic headlines just makes me groan.', '>>{SchlangeHatRecht} : Article has been up 22 minutes and not a single CtR comment yet? Are they slipping, or did the shift just end?', '>>{fiveamtuesday} : Welcome to shitty wok, would you like to try out shitty pork?', '>>{fiveamtuesday} : That, or vote for the Bernie/Carter type.', ">>{zereaven} : I got my ms pro 3 for 250$ so I'll just stick to it", ">>{ENTspannen} : Well, I'll have the vegetarian then.", '>>{All_I_feel_is_rage} : This is actually the new Acer aspire pidgeon beta capa touch 14.', ">>{DebussySIMiami} : There's a reason Trump outsources his trophy wives. There are some jobs Americans just won't do.", ">>{Gnarledhalo} : Criminal prosecution from who? The Attorney General? That's likely.", ">>{Inlikealamb} : They have plans? Every policy point I've heard from either is contradicted by something they've said previously or will say in the near future.", ">>{All_I_feel_is_rage} : Ads don't typically bring up the downsides of the product...", ">>{JohnnyRandazzo} : I'd take being called ugly by 100% of the country if I got half million dollar salary jobs just because 13 years later.", ">>{aledlewis} : It's all part of Brock's Clinton cheerleading and Establishment supporting media networK. We should have better standards for news sources.", '>>{just_a_timetraveller} : It needs to be enforced. Problem is DOJ is compromised.', '>>{EasyLightfoot} : Can this freak show House of Saddam shit be over with please.', '>>{TheBatmanIRL} : I thought it was already obvious that Trump and family are already profiting from the presidency. If none of the Trumps are caught for this over the next 4 years, then the US legal system is a bigger joke than I thought it was.', ">>{Guitata} : I would love an explanation about how nepotism isn't taking over the government...soon, we will have a lybian stylle government, with usay and uday running around killing animals and people withm impunity. ok, that was sarcastic, but how, on God's green earth, are the reupblicans ignoring this fact that trump is building a family government business? Can republicans get much more unpatriotic as to continue to support the disolution of the American Nation?", ">>{light24bulbs} : It aspires to take alpha videos. What aren't you getting?!", '>>{LuminoZero} : The President and Vice President are immune to conflict of interest laws. His children are not.', '>>{nliausacmmv} : Because neither of them can be taken at their word, one of them is a criminal and the other one is a buffoon.', '>>{TahMephs} : Cake or death? Cake. Well we\'re *out of cake*. We weren\'t expecting such a rush. So my choices are "or death"?', ">>{Sullitude} : How'd you pull that off, bought from a friend?", ">>{wittystuffgoeshere4} : Luckily for these two, they don't live in a developed country. They'll be fine", '>>{TuLegit2quit} : Because Clinton is corrupt and Trump is a buffoon. Johnson looks good to this voter by default.', '>>{saraquael} : I agree. And Breitbart, The Daily Caller/Wire and all the other propaganda sites should be banned from this sub.', '>>{astroztx} : ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^0.8189 > [What is this?](https://pastebin.com/64GuVi2F)', ">>{mindbleach} : I'm downvoting this purely because the title is gobbledygook.", '>>{its_a_me_garri_oh} : Your account is one year old, you fucking dipshit😜', ">>{BuckpDoe} : What is it with members of the Trump White House Family and dressing up for photographs? It's disgusting to click on a link or turn on the TV and have their Fake Glamour shots stuffed in your face.", '>>{hetellsitlikeitis} : Shhh! Let them continue down that path further...', '>>{DC25NYC} : Just curious do you think positive posts and comments about Hillary are only made from people paid to do so?', ">>{swamp-ecology} : More importantly, you don't need to ask congress permission to prosecute them.", ">>{caeroe} : Being how radically this subreddit shifted after the CTR campaign was announced, yes I do. They're not just actively working to suppress anything remotely critical of Hillary, but working to silence any 3rd party news as well. You'll see new accounts that flood the same headlines from DNC media approved outlets like Politico and WaPo, and Chelsea Clinton's The Daily Beast.", '>>{bulltproof} : Poor title. It should say **The Acer 12 does hybrid the right way. See the video**', '>>{bphilly_cheesesteak} : I was extremely confused about what "hybrid right video" was until I went to the site and saw "Loading video..."', '>>{pizzatra} : Really CTR was announced at the height of Bernie mania and this sub didn\'t stop being an anti Hillary pro Bernie sub until after Bernie had finally "gone all the way to the convention" and lost. Pro Hillary people just didn\'t post in here before that because they either got down voted and their comments were not seen, or they didn\'t want to deal with the Bernie cult. Now the only people I see whining about it are edgy Trumpet trolls.', ">>{aledlewis} : The very fact you have to ask that shows that you're not ready.", '>>{Zykium} : They really were needlessly cruel. You can bash on the Clintons all you like but at the time she was just an innocent kid who happened to have famous parents.', ">>{ClinicalScientician} : It may just be me, but I am not a fan of tablet computers. As seperate entities count me in, but combined I can't do it. I hate the feel of it, and prefer a solid connection between the screen and keyboard plus the fact that the keyboard feels too small on tablets", '>>{fingerofchicken} : Well, you know about diesel left video, right?', '>>{californianion} : Aaaaaand this is the problem with HRC\'s deplorable "muddying the waters" strategy. Because we know that CTR is trolling social media, everyone is suspect, nothing can be taken at face value, and the integrity of these forums is compromised. The CTR troll thing is a below-the-belt political move and it shouldn\'t just be brushed off as whining.', ">>{Manafort} : There are real Hillary supporters here too, but those are not the comments always posted in the first few minutes of almost every new thread. It really isn't that hard to differentiate between legitimate supporters and the astroturfers.", ">>{politicalGuitarist} : Exactly. These headlines are great for a quick sense of relief from the daily reality that is this administration, but beyond that, they don't seem to have a path to actually happening.", ">>{pizzatra} : No it's whining. You are naive if you think people being paid to correct willful or unwillful spreading of lies and disinformation is below the belt.", '>>{Notorious4CHAN} : Ah fuck! Does this mean I need *more* Pidgey?', '>>{kluz14} : How is the pen, better or worse than surface pro 4 pen?', '>>{pizzatra} : Wow? So people spreading lies on purpose should be ignored?', '>>{zacdenver} : Fat chance. The only time rich people pay for their crimes is when they screw over even richer people, as Bernie Madoff did.', ">>{Lethtor} : I have not used it myself yet, but from what I hear, the surface's pen is superior", '>>{SchlangeHatRecht} : maybe the Media Matters story revelations have affected them.', '>>{DC25NYC} : I think you underestimate how many people browse r/politics/new', ">>{n60storm4} : I don't think I could ever bring myself to buy another Acer product.", ">>{nomadofwaves} : Prob a good thing there's a lot more richer people than them around.", '>>{evanston4393} : The surface uses Wacom tech for the pen, similar to their cintiq line. No capacitive touch screen is going to even hold a candle to it unfortunately', ">>{californianion} : One person's lie is another person's truth... Public forums have been used since the beginning of time to hash out what people believe. If anyone is paid to do so, they should let everyone know and not masquerade as a commoner - which is a lie in and of itself. Speaking of lies, you don't think HRC is honest, do you? You can't because... that would be absurd...", '>>{cruciblenein} : And then 6 million dollars was added to the CTR warchest. Thats why they are more active - theres more of them now', ">>{Manafort} : >I think you underestimate how many people browse r/politics/new I don't. I'm talking about a few dozen users who constantly post using the same deflection or ad hominem in virtually every thread. There is also the epidemic of 1 hour old accounts with pages and pages of anti-Trump/pro-Clinton posts that rarely if ever pertain to the actual topic at hand.", '>>{adam_lepp} : She should be more worried about "schlepping" that beer gut around as opposed to the non-usb charger.', ">>{unsilviu} : I think the SP4 pen isn't Wacom, it's something else.", '>>{pizzatra} : No there are black and white lies. Unless you think Clintons lies are subjective also?', '>>{Stuckinaloop} : Dear Chelsea, Please come back when you have had to pay for anything with money that you earned yourself. Not money from working for your parents friends, but from a job you went out and attained on your own.', '>>{darthboolean} : Surface switched to Ntrig years ago with the Surface Pro 3.', '>>{daveo2} : Its amazing how much [Chelsea looks like Webb Hubbel](http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/10/Webb-Hubbell_Chelsea-Clinton.jpg) If I didnt know better, I would think they are father and daughter.', '>>{DC25NYC} : to be fair you see the same thing in regards to trump supporters.', '>>{seius} : So we arent even hiding it anymore and linking right to shareblue ... There is no law that states that his daughter cannot work for him in the white house, this is top level spin, he can run the executive branch as he sees fit.', '>>{Billy_Chapas} : Inb4 it stops working correctly weeks after the warranty expires.', '>>{Manafort} : >to be fair you see the same thing in regards to trump supporters. You do, but not to the same extent in my experience.', '>>{TheCrisisification} : ooooook so I wasnt the only one who thought the grammar could use some work. some quotation marks would be great, thanks.', ">>{SALTED_MEAT} : Like I said, there are different kinds of hard. You really don't think that would fuck with a kid?", ">>{katieames} : Considering what's gone unchecked so far, I'll believe it when I see it.", ">>{SALTED_MEAT} : That's nice. You know, most people with a masters from Oxford don't actually have to do that first part for that money.", ">>{DEADB33F} : It's the kickstand thing that kills these IMO. You can't really use it on your lap, or in bed, or on the sofa, nor can you pull it across your desk without the screen falling over.", '>>{JohnnyRandazzo} : Lol please tell me how she earned 600k a year from NBC https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2014/06/13/what-did-nbc-newss-chelsea-clinton-do-for-her-600000-salary/?utm_term=.54a619959bc9', ">>{SALTED_MEAT} : If that name hadn’t been connected to American royalty, she could have expected to rake in between $100,000 and $200,000 as a first-year network correspondent, a job that people from less-high-profile families snare only through years and years of tireless work covering the news. That salary range is confirmed by several people familiar with the compensation levels at major network news outlets. Yeah, I just can't find any ire over this.", '>>{SALTED_MEAT} : Republicans. Those are the people that claim to own family values and Jesus.', '>>{Kafiristan22} : Um, yes, yes there is a law against this ever since JFK appointed RFK to be attorney general. [5 U.S. Code § 3110 - Employment of relatives;restrictions](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/3110)', ">>{JohnnyRandazzo} : Yup there's no truth to it at all right? It's the simple story of the bosses kid getting things handed to them for who they are not what they do. She did absolutely nothing as a correspondent and got paid 600k for it", ">>{SALTED_MEAT} : I don't know what she did, but you don't know that either. Maybe she got a bonus from her parents because their political careers made her a target for delicate souls like Rush. If that is the case, she still earned it. You really want to pretend that we would have ever heard of the last Bush without his father? The hash reality is that we would not have ever heard of little Bush, he would have a car dealership or something at best.", ">>{PartyboobBoobytrap} : But... its an Acer. Are we supposed to trust Acer's quality all of a sudden?", '>>{seius} : (c) An individual appointed, employed, promoted, or advanced in violation of this section is not entitled to pay, and money may not be paid from the Treasury as pay to an individual so appointed, employed, promoted, or advanced.', '>>{No_stop_signs} : Of course she trusts her, her mother got her "jobs" earning a million dollars a year straight out of college.', '>>{astroztx} : ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^0.9042 > [What is this?](https://pastebin.com/64GuVi2F)', '>>{DanielMillican} : I would love to see CNET do a comparison video between this and the Microsoft surface pro for.\ufeff', ">>{SALTED_MEAT} : I don't think so. I make about $40k per year. I am frugal and that is enough to get by with a tiny cushion. I mean, if my car breaks, I'm not fucked. I don't actually want expensive stuff. I want stuff, I want a whole bunch of stuff, but none of it really costs all that much. I'm not particularly happy. There is nothing that I could buy that would make me happy. So, for reals, If I could have a bunch of money or not have some horrible traumatic shit happen. I wouldn't choose the money. You actually can't buy everything.", ">>{dahauns} : It's their new tech to battle Vertical Video Syndrome.", ">>{13al42mo} : It's a technology called N-Trig, and they use active pen technology (pen needs a battery). MS even bought the company that makes N-Trig, so you can bet it's here to stay. Edit: Words.", ">>{Kamp_stardust} : Oh, it's not a joke, if you're poor and/or a minority that is.", ">>{justlance} : I couldn't bring myself to watch the full video. The wonky intel sticker on the front was just making my toes curl", ">>{PersimBerry} : What's poor about the screen? It's higher res than your Surface 3 and IPS. Pen does seem sub-par though, would have been better if they used Wacom AES or something. Sure it gets less battery than your Surface 3 and is more expensive but it's also significantly faster, like almost as fast as the fan using Surface Pro 4. Much much faster than the Atom in the Surface 3. Plus it has a real SSD instead of eMMC and way more RAM. This thing will be significantly faster and more usable in Photoshop than a Surface 3. The Surface Pro series also doesn't charge by MicroUSB, it's just not an option with more powerful processors. Charging by USB C is possible though, so points for that. This is really a Surface Pro competitor, the Surface 3 isn't really in the same performance league.", '>>{JourneymanWelder} : um what? you cant even ask a question the right way.', '>>{PartyboobBoobytrap} : Acer is consistently near the bottom for quality and consumer satisfaction. I have yet to see a good Acer. I regularly see shit shows from Acer. Rarely have I walked away after working on one or retiring one with a smile on my face.', '>>{scottcphotog} : Wow, they put a slim keyboard type cover on a tablet, and a kickstand built in, where did they come up with such a revolutionary idea?', '>>{peanutismint} : I\'m not really into these tablet laptop things but here\'s a few red flags for me: > "The screen isn\'t OLED but looks pretty good anyway..." > "You can\'t charge via USB so you have to schlep the 11oz charger around..." And the worst thing of all, check out the Dutch-angled Intel sticker [haphazardly slapped onto the corner of the display at around 0:57...](http://i.imgur.com/nkNFJaj.png) /r/mildlyinfuriating', ">>{peanutismint} : Somewhere Apple just patented *'Hybrid Right Video'* and will announce it as an innovative new feature coming iPad 12 in about ~2yrs.", ">>{aintnufincleverhere} : I haven't found any good reason to want a tablet. I have an ipad. Its a waste. There isn't anything I'd rather use my ipad for over my laptop. The only reason I'd think these hybrid machines are cool is if the keyboard is detachable and still works as a wireless keyboard. That'd be cool I suppose. If hybrids aren't doing that, they should. I could imagine cases where I'd be more comfortable if I could place my laptop's screen in one place while typing nearby, like in bed I could put the screen on the night stand and type from my lap or something. I wouldn't have to sit up to use the keyboard. I imagine there are use cases for tablets that involve drawing or something. I just don't have any interest in my life for them.", ">>{Fuckoffwiththetools} : Off course they know, that's one of the reasons they are still in business.", '>>{GoOtterGo} : Same. The Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 does hybrid right microsoft surface', ">>{shadowdude777} : As someone whose XR341CK just inexplicably died, me too. It's not about the fact that it's defective, because every brand makes defective things occasionally. It's the awful customer service and how hard it is to get ahold of a real person when something *does* go wrong.", ">>{Astrobody} : If you hunt, they have a few decent laptops. I have an Aspire V5 that's about the same thickness as a Razer Blade, mostly metal body, soft grip bottom, very solid build quality. Packs an i7 and a GTX 850m. It does get damn hot, though, when playing games like R6 Siege.", '>>{chadochocinqo} : The "Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 does hybrid right" video', '>>{AssCalloway} : Read everything . Learned zero about whatever this is...', '>>{chadochocinqo} : The Acer 12 does hybrid the right way. See the video. Watch until the end. Surprises throughout. DO NOT SKIP. Gone Sexual FTFY', ">>{eyefullawgic} : I tried an HP Spectre x2 first - got one for $450 from Amazon recently, but it was by far the least stable Windows computer I've ever used (out of 5 Windows 10 machines in our home, 2 that I built). Ended up buying this Acer from Costco - $650 for the i5, 8gb ram, 256gb SSD version that also includes the pen. Like it a lot so far. Recently took it on a 3 night family vacation, using it to check e-mail and news in the morning and evenings. Didn't have to charge it once, although I left the battery saver on. One thing about the screen not mentioned - it is BRIGHT, which is probably one of the reasons battery life takes a hit. Much brighter than the HP, and some reviews I've seen say the max brightness is higher than other 2-in-1s, including the Surface.", '>>{salzone0816} : Surface 3 has an atom processor and 2GB ram. This has current gen i5 and 8GB ram. Surface 3 also does not include keyboard in base price and this does.', '>>{vertigo3pc} : As an owner of this device, I usually just call it "my Acer tablet".', '>>{Raf99} : I only suggest Acer or Asus to clients. 18+ years in IT.', ">>{kluz14} : It's got active digitizer though, same as the surface. That's what I read anyway. So whether it's Wacom or Ntrig shouldn't make a huge difference for simple note taking.", '>>{crossmissiom} : It\'s a hybrid, it just goes "zzzzzzzzzzzzz" all the time. I like mine going "vroom, vroom".', '>>{otaschon} : Acer had few bad series of lower end models like 10 years ago. the bad name stuck. it didnt help that Acer seels mostly dirt cheap laptops, but that is changing in recent years, especially last two years show very different Acer. Their market share in 500+ and even 900+ USD segment is rising and rightly so. Before Alpha 12, which beats its competition in the price/performance ratio, there were V13 and S13 laptops with genuinely unique price/performance proposition and the Nitro family which has quite some following. And their gaming stuff under Predator Brand? The best gaming monitors out there and their laptops are very well reviewed as well. I have reviewed quite some Acer PCs during the last 5 years and used them personally (on my own money) - Chromebook 720, Chromebook 13 and V13 and now I have my Alpha. All that while having access to PCs like Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro, Dell XPS 13 or HP Envy. What I like about stuff I buy the most is what my money get me, and with Acer i have found the best value. Your mileage may vary of course.', '>>{otaschon} : yep, surface has better pressure sensitivity but I cant see any problem in regular use for inking, for drawing on a higher level, it may be noticeable difference.', '>>{otaschon} : Surface 4 Pro has actually brighter display on max settings, but Alpha is well above average in brightness', '>>{otaschon} : Well, that was my opinion untill I tried Surface 4 which is actually "lapable". I got it as a loaner for few days during MS BUILD conference this year after my Acer hit the floor and LCD cable disconnected (fixed in 3 business days btw when I returned). Alpha is even better with its kickstand as you can wedge your knee in (I like to sit with one leg over the other or have it risen on a pedestal under train window (i comute in a train for 90 minuts or so each day). And the keyboard on Alpha is supperior to the one on Surface pro 4. Also having the ability to take the keyboard way is usefull when space is an issue like on an airplane or in your kitchen.', '>>{NerdHavoc} : Is it generally followed by "...is broken again?" My experience with Acer products is not good', ">>{vertigo3pc} : Hahaha. Nah, it's been good so far.", ">>{datums} : It was an honest question, but I got a lot of joke answers. You actually answered my question. Thanks. When I come across people on reddit who are decent, I creep their comments a bit, and if they seem to have the right interests, I invite them to my little subreddit, /r/Skookum. I think it's one of the best subs on reddit. Let me know what you think.", '>>{datums} : As a journeyman welder, you would probably really like my sub, /r/Skookum.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{Samhoustoneggers} : It\'s really not a hard question when you pay the littlest amount of attention to the "details" of trumps plan, and the details of hillary\'s.', '>>{Argue-With-Strangers} : While there is disagreement who is worse: 1) Both are shit. 2) Both are shitty people. 3) Both have shitty policies. 4) Both have done shitty things. 5) Both will continue to do shitty things. 6) Neither should be be allowed to lead anyone, anywhere, in anyway, for any reason, at anytime, under any circumstances.', '>>{Chronoallusion} : I think you have hit the shitty nail in the shitty coffin.', '>>{el-toro-loco} : *You can pick between getting shot or stabbed.* "Can I pick a hug?" *Yes, but it won\'t happen. You will be shot or stabbed.* "Then shoot me or stab me, but I want it to go on the record that I chose a hug."', '>>{tangibleadhd} : Hillary Clinton >Nearly half of Americans who dislike Clinton say she can’t be trusted and listed it as one of their biggest concerns. More than a third said she is corrupt. And 21 percent said her positions change with political winds, which seems a corollary to the trustworthiness question. But very few of her detractors say she’s unqualified, or that she doesn’t know enough about the issues. And practically no one believes she is a racist. Donald Trump >While the New York billionaire doesn’t have to navigate the colossal icebergs of dislike that afflict Clinton, his faults are arguably worse. A quarter of his detractors said racism is his biggest flaw; that figure jumps to 35 percent for Hispanic voters and 40 percent for black voters. Another 20 percent said Trump doesn’t have the right kind of experience to be president, a reason largely cited by older voters. Age also accounted for differences in other areas of the survey. Retirees, for example, were half as likely to name sexism as one of their top gripes with Trump and three times more likely than their youngest counterparts to say Clinton is too liberal. And voters who came of age during Bill Clinton’s presidency are the most likely to say Hillary Clinton is “too divisive.” In conclusion: >But here’s the study’s biggest flaw: By definition, it doesn’t break new ground. **By giving respondents a menu of well-known complaints against candidates and asking them to pick two, the survey narrows itself to poll-tested smears most Americans already know about.** While open-ended questions are tougher to poll, they can yield better insights. That’s to say it would have been interesting to see what unprompted voters had to say.', '>>{Scarbane} : I abstain from being shot or stabbed.', ">>{Omnibrad} : Their relatives bomb the shit out of each other, so what's so wrong with the US bombing them too? /s", ">>{Omnibrad} : Trump is both a shot and stab wound. Hillary...is different. The best analogy I can think of is cancer: it won't be fast, but by the end you will wish it was. EDIT - You'll get lots of hugs with cancer though, just not until after your hair falls out and you're shitting the bed.", '>>{FLRSH} : The thing with folks not thinking she\'s racist, is she\'s definitely had her flings with racism. See, super predators comment or the CP time joke. And her policies certainly disproportionately harm POC. Such as the 94 crime bill leading to a massive percentage of Black and Latino youth being over-incarcerated, her support for the death penalty which is often racially applied, and marijuana enforcement being hardest on POC, which Hillary opposes legalizing. And on the immigration front, she is against giving driver\'s licenses to undocumented migrants, is for a barrier along Mexico which is both a "fence" and a "wall" in places, and is down for turning away children refugees at our borders to make a point instead of granting them amnesty. She implements or supports a lot of policy that\'s racially charged without often saying racist things. Her career is Trump\'s words in action, just tempered to placate the public.', ">>{like_ya_do} : The worst part is that you don't know where you'll get shot or stabbed. Maybe you'd rather be stabbed, but the stabber stabs you in the temple, and then the shooter shoots someone's toe. You're dead but the other guy just has a limp. Or maybe you'd rather be shot and the shooter shoots you in the eye. Meanwhile the stabber gets someone's earlobe. It's impossible to say one is worse than the other because there are no clear guidelines for how and where you'll be shot or stabbed.", '>>{like_ya_do} : This doesn\'t even include superpredators, reports that she\'s called Jesse Jackson the n-word or that she\'s frequently reported as being demeaning of people off camera. It also excludes how she treated the BLM activist ("Back to the issues that *I* think matter ") and the young woman who asked her at a book signing how she would help improve diversity in elected offices ("Why don\'t *you* run for something then?"). She\'s unkind in general; I don\'t know why anyone would believe her appeals to minorities are anything but pandering.', '>>{egg_for_your_trouble} : This Carlin quote really appeals to me. "Everybody complains about politicians. Everybody says, “They suck”. But where do people think these politicians come from? They don’t fall out of the sky. They don’t pass through a membrane from another reality. No, they come from American homes, American families, American schools, American churches, American businesses, and they’re elected by American\xa0voters.Thisis the best we can do, folks. It’s what our system produces: Garbage in, garbage out. ….I have solved this political dilemma in a very direct way: I don’t vote. On Election Day, I stay home. I firmly believe that if you vote, you have no right to complain. Now, some people like to twist that around. They say, “If you don’t vote, you have no right to complain”, but where’s the logic in that? If you vote, and you elect dishonest, incompetent politicians, and they get into office and screw everything up, you are responsible for what they have done. You voted them in. You caused the problem. You have no right to complain. I, on the other hand, who did not vote — who did not even leave the house on Election Day — am in no way responsible for that these politicians have done and have every right to complain about the mess that you created. That I didn’t have anything to do with. So when you’re having one of those swell elections that you like so much…on that day I will be doing essentially the same as you…the only difference is when I get done masturbating I’ll have a little something to show for it."', '>>{fiveamtuesday} : Welcome to shitty wok, would you like to try out shitty pork?', '>>{fiveamtuesday} : That, or vote for the Bernie/Carter type.', ">>{ENTspannen} : Well, I'll have the vegetarian then.", ">>{Inlikealamb} : They have plans? Every policy point I've heard from either is contradicted by something they've said previously or will say in the near future.", '>>{nliausacmmv} : Because neither of them can be taken at their word, one of them is a criminal and the other one is a buffoon.', '>>{TahMephs} : Cake or death? Cake. Well we\'re *out of cake*. We weren\'t expecting such a rush. So my choices are "or death"?', '>>{TuLegit2quit} : Because Clinton is corrupt and Trump is a buffoon. Johnson looks good to this voter by default.'], ['>>{Katyusha41} : Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner on path to “criminal prosecution,” ethics experts warn', '>>{Katyusha41} : >Richard Painter, Norman Eisen, and Virginia Canter of the group Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW) note that if Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump use their White House roles to enrich themselves, it “may expose the couple to criminal prosecution, and the White House and all of us to more Trump scandal.”', '>>{losotr} : Is that the biggest dimple ever or is it just dented in from being punched in the same spot so many times?', ">>{morbidexpression} : I am loving whenever Richard Painter comes on TV, pissed off like you wouldn't believe....", ">>{ovrwrtch_} : Well yeah they're kind of running the country and meeting foreign leaders on our behalf, while profiting immensely all while being elected and confirmed by no one. I hope they all go down I really do.", '>>{Kabuki_Writer} : Been coming here for 5 years. If it gets much cheesier I am going to find another place.', '>>{BiffySkipwell} : sort of...ShareBlue is under the ownership of MediaMatters but Brock isnt a direct contributor to content. While they Willis/T. Christopher have some good points to make their insatiable need to drive traffic with hyperbolic headlines just makes me groan.', ">>{Gnarledhalo} : Criminal prosecution from who? The Attorney General? That's likely.", ">>{aledlewis} : It's all part of Brock's Clinton cheerleading and Establishment supporting media networK. We should have better standards for news sources.", '>>{just_a_timetraveller} : It needs to be enforced. Problem is DOJ is compromised.', '>>{EasyLightfoot} : Can this freak show House of Saddam shit be over with please.', '>>{TheBatmanIRL} : I thought it was already obvious that Trump and family are already profiting from the presidency. If none of the Trumps are caught for this over the next 4 years, then the US legal system is a bigger joke than I thought it was.', ">>{Guitata} : I would love an explanation about how nepotism isn't taking over the government...soon, we will have a lybian stylle government, with usay and uday running around killing animals and people withm impunity. ok, that was sarcastic, but how, on God's green earth, are the reupblicans ignoring this fact that trump is building a family government business? Can republicans get much more unpatriotic as to continue to support the disolution of the American Nation?", '>>{LuminoZero} : The President and Vice President are immune to conflict of interest laws. His children are not.', ">>{wittystuffgoeshere4} : Luckily for these two, they don't live in a developed country. They'll be fine", '>>{saraquael} : I agree. And Breitbart, The Daily Caller/Wire and all the other propaganda sites should be banned from this sub.', '>>{its_a_me_garri_oh} : Your account is one year old, you fucking dipshit😜', ">>{BuckpDoe} : What is it with members of the Trump White House Family and dressing up for photographs? It's disgusting to click on a link or turn on the TV and have their Fake Glamour shots stuffed in your face.", '>>{hetellsitlikeitis} : Shhh! Let them continue down that path further...', ">>{swamp-ecology} : More importantly, you don't need to ask congress permission to prosecute them.", ">>{aledlewis} : The very fact you have to ask that shows that you're not ready.", ">>{politicalGuitarist} : Exactly. These headlines are great for a quick sense of relief from the daily reality that is this administration, but beyond that, they don't seem to have a path to actually happening.", '>>{zacdenver} : Fat chance. The only time rich people pay for their crimes is when they screw over even richer people, as Bernie Madoff did.', ">>{nomadofwaves} : Prob a good thing there's a lot more richer people than them around.", '>>{seius} : So we arent even hiding it anymore and linking right to shareblue ... There is no law that states that his daughter cannot work for him in the white house, this is top level spin, he can run the executive branch as he sees fit.', ">>{katieames} : Considering what's gone unchecked so far, I'll believe it when I see it.", '>>{Kafiristan22} : Um, yes, yes there is a law against this ever since JFK appointed RFK to be attorney general. [5 U.S. Code § 3110 - Employment of relatives;restrictions](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/3110)', '>>{seius} : (c) An individual appointed, employed, promoted, or advanced in violation of this section is not entitled to pay, and money may not be paid from the Treasury as pay to an individual so appointed, employed, promoted, or advanced.', ">>{Kamp_stardust} : Oh, it's not a joke, if you're poor and/or a minority that is."], ['>>{jsdow640} : Oh poor old Chelsea has lived a really hard life...', '>>{wytxcook} : > Chelsea Clinton also said she was baffled by her mother\'s low trustworthiness ratings in polls. "They make no sense to me," she said. "There is no one I trust more than my mom." Oh well bless your heart.', '>>{BeowulfShaeffer} : Any headline with "slams" in it should be downvotes to oblivion.', ">>{SALTED_MEAT} : Eh, you know, she probably has. There are different kinds of hard. When she was like 13 years old half of the country wouldn't stop talking about how ugly she was.", ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : Why is it misogynistic and sexist to say that Hillary doesn't have a presidential look?", '>>{JerseyWabbit} : Is this supposed to make a Hillary (who is supposed to be so tough) a victim, and sympathetic to women voters?', ">>{Zykium} : Well I'd hope you trust your mother Chelsea but she didn't raise the rest of us. I'll write the Breitbart headline though > Does Chelsea Clinton not trust her father?", '>>{SchlangeHatRecht} : Article has been up 22 minutes and not a single CtR comment yet? Are they slipping, or did the shift just end?', ">>{DebussySIMiami} : There's a reason Trump outsources his trophy wives. There are some jobs Americans just won't do.", ">>{JohnnyRandazzo} : I'd take being called ugly by 100% of the country if I got half million dollar salary jobs just because 13 years later.", '>>{astroztx} : ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^0.8189 > [What is this?](https://pastebin.com/64GuVi2F)', '>>{DC25NYC} : Just curious do you think positive posts and comments about Hillary are only made from people paid to do so?', ">>{caeroe} : Being how radically this subreddit shifted after the CTR campaign was announced, yes I do. They're not just actively working to suppress anything remotely critical of Hillary, but working to silence any 3rd party news as well. You'll see new accounts that flood the same headlines from DNC media approved outlets like Politico and WaPo, and Chelsea Clinton's The Daily Beast.", '>>{pizzatra} : Really CTR was announced at the height of Bernie mania and this sub didn\'t stop being an anti Hillary pro Bernie sub until after Bernie had finally "gone all the way to the convention" and lost. Pro Hillary people just didn\'t post in here before that because they either got down voted and their comments were not seen, or they didn\'t want to deal with the Bernie cult. Now the only people I see whining about it are edgy Trumpet trolls.', '>>{Zykium} : They really were needlessly cruel. You can bash on the Clintons all you like but at the time she was just an innocent kid who happened to have famous parents.', '>>{californianion} : Aaaaaand this is the problem with HRC\'s deplorable "muddying the waters" strategy. Because we know that CTR is trolling social media, everyone is suspect, nothing can be taken at face value, and the integrity of these forums is compromised. The CTR troll thing is a below-the-belt political move and it shouldn\'t just be brushed off as whining.', ">>{Manafort} : There are real Hillary supporters here too, but those are not the comments always posted in the first few minutes of almost every new thread. It really isn't that hard to differentiate between legitimate supporters and the astroturfers.", ">>{pizzatra} : No it's whining. You are naive if you think people being paid to correct willful or unwillful spreading of lies and disinformation is below the belt.", '>>{pizzatra} : Wow? So people spreading lies on purpose should be ignored?', '>>{SchlangeHatRecht} : maybe the Media Matters story revelations have affected them.', '>>{DC25NYC} : I think you underestimate how many people browse r/politics/new', ">>{californianion} : One person's lie is another person's truth... Public forums have been used since the beginning of time to hash out what people believe. If anyone is paid to do so, they should let everyone know and not masquerade as a commoner - which is a lie in and of itself. Speaking of lies, you don't think HRC is honest, do you? You can't because... that would be absurd...", '>>{cruciblenein} : And then 6 million dollars was added to the CTR warchest. Thats why they are more active - theres more of them now', ">>{Manafort} : >I think you underestimate how many people browse r/politics/new I don't. I'm talking about a few dozen users who constantly post using the same deflection or ad hominem in virtually every thread. There is also the epidemic of 1 hour old accounts with pages and pages of anti-Trump/pro-Clinton posts that rarely if ever pertain to the actual topic at hand.", '>>{pizzatra} : No there are black and white lies. Unless you think Clintons lies are subjective also?', '>>{Stuckinaloop} : Dear Chelsea, Please come back when you have had to pay for anything with money that you earned yourself. Not money from working for your parents friends, but from a job you went out and attained on your own.', '>>{daveo2} : Its amazing how much [Chelsea looks like Webb Hubbel](http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/10/Webb-Hubbell_Chelsea-Clinton.jpg) If I didnt know better, I would think they are father and daughter.', '>>{DC25NYC} : to be fair you see the same thing in regards to trump supporters.', '>>{Manafort} : >to be fair you see the same thing in regards to trump supporters. You do, but not to the same extent in my experience.', ">>{SALTED_MEAT} : Like I said, there are different kinds of hard. You really don't think that would fuck with a kid?", ">>{SALTED_MEAT} : That's nice. You know, most people with a masters from Oxford don't actually have to do that first part for that money.", '>>{JohnnyRandazzo} : Lol please tell me how she earned 600k a year from NBC https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2014/06/13/what-did-nbc-newss-chelsea-clinton-do-for-her-600000-salary/?utm_term=.54a619959bc9', ">>{SALTED_MEAT} : If that name hadn’t been connected to American royalty, she could have expected to rake in between $100,000 and $200,000 as a first-year network correspondent, a job that people from less-high-profile families snare only through years and years of tireless work covering the news. That salary range is confirmed by several people familiar with the compensation levels at major network news outlets. Yeah, I just can't find any ire over this.", '>>{SALTED_MEAT} : Republicans. Those are the people that claim to own family values and Jesus.', ">>{JohnnyRandazzo} : Yup there's no truth to it at all right? It's the simple story of the bosses kid getting things handed to them for who they are not what they do. She did absolutely nothing as a correspondent and got paid 600k for it", ">>{SALTED_MEAT} : I don't know what she did, but you don't know that either. Maybe she got a bonus from her parents because their political careers made her a target for delicate souls like Rush. If that is the case, she still earned it. You really want to pretend that we would have ever heard of the last Bush without his father? The hash reality is that we would not have ever heard of little Bush, he would have a car dealership or something at best.", '>>{No_stop_signs} : Of course she trusts her, her mother got her "jobs" earning a million dollars a year straight out of college.', '>>{astroztx} : ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^0.9042 > [What is this?](https://pastebin.com/64GuVi2F)', ">>{SALTED_MEAT} : I don't think so. I make about $40k per year. I am frugal and that is enough to get by with a tiny cushion. I mean, if my car breaks, I'm not fucked. I don't actually want expensive stuff. I want stuff, I want a whole bunch of stuff, but none of it really costs all that much. I'm not particularly happy. There is nothing that I could buy that would make me happy. So, for reals, If I could have a bunch of money or not have some horrible traumatic shit happen. I wouldn't choose the money. You actually can't buy everything."], ['>>{Amy75892} : The Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 does hybrid right video', '>>{Alexir563} : As I scrolled I totally thought this was a Surface', ">>{Dipsquat} : I can't believe I almost waited through an Ad, just to watch an Ad...", ">>{NerdHavoc} : Everyone is concerned about Hybrid Right and I'm just like WTF kind of name is Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12?", ">>{JoeMobley} : Your videos will start after this advertisement. Nope! 3 seconds and I'm out'ta-there.", ">>{otaschon} : Alpha is great though, it's much cheaper than surface, does come with keyboard and has no fans. I am using it for second month as my daily driver and can't go back to regular laptop even I hated detachables so hard", ">>{zereaven} : I got my ms pro 3 for 250$ so I'll just stick to it", '>>{All_I_feel_is_rage} : This is actually the new Acer aspire pidgeon beta capa touch 14.', ">>{All_I_feel_is_rage} : Ads don't typically bring up the downsides of the product...", ">>{light24bulbs} : It aspires to take alpha videos. What aren't you getting?!", ">>{Sullitude} : How'd you pull that off, bought from a friend?", ">>{mindbleach} : I'm downvoting this purely because the title is gobbledygook.", '>>{bulltproof} : Poor title. It should say **The Acer 12 does hybrid the right way. See the video**', '>>{bphilly_cheesesteak} : I was extremely confused about what "hybrid right video" was until I went to the site and saw "Loading video..."', ">>{ClinicalScientician} : It may just be me, but I am not a fan of tablet computers. As seperate entities count me in, but combined I can't do it. I hate the feel of it, and prefer a solid connection between the screen and keyboard plus the fact that the keyboard feels too small on tablets", '>>{fingerofchicken} : Well, you know about diesel left video, right?', '>>{Notorious4CHAN} : Ah fuck! Does this mean I need *more* Pidgey?', '>>{kluz14} : How is the pen, better or worse than surface pro 4 pen?', ">>{Lethtor} : I have not used it myself yet, but from what I hear, the surface's pen is superior", ">>{n60storm4} : I don't think I could ever bring myself to buy another Acer product.", '>>{evanston4393} : The surface uses Wacom tech for the pen, similar to their cintiq line. No capacitive touch screen is going to even hold a candle to it unfortunately', '>>{adam_lepp} : She should be more worried about "schlepping" that beer gut around as opposed to the non-usb charger.', ">>{unsilviu} : I think the SP4 pen isn't Wacom, it's something else.", '>>{darthboolean} : Surface switched to Ntrig years ago with the Surface Pro 3.', '>>{Billy_Chapas} : Inb4 it stops working correctly weeks after the warranty expires.', '>>{TheCrisisification} : ooooook so I wasnt the only one who thought the grammar could use some work. some quotation marks would be great, thanks.', ">>{DEADB33F} : It's the kickstand thing that kills these IMO. You can't really use it on your lap, or in bed, or on the sofa, nor can you pull it across your desk without the screen falling over.", ">>{PartyboobBoobytrap} : But... its an Acer. Are we supposed to trust Acer's quality all of a sudden?", '>>{DanielMillican} : I would love to see CNET do a comparison video between this and the Microsoft surface pro for.\ufeff', ">>{dahauns} : It's their new tech to battle Vertical Video Syndrome.", ">>{13al42mo} : It's a technology called N-Trig, and they use active pen technology (pen needs a battery). MS even bought the company that makes N-Trig, so you can bet it's here to stay. Edit: Words.", ">>{justlance} : I couldn't bring myself to watch the full video. The wonky intel sticker on the front was just making my toes curl", ">>{PersimBerry} : What's poor about the screen? It's higher res than your Surface 3 and IPS. Pen does seem sub-par though, would have been better if they used Wacom AES or something. Sure it gets less battery than your Surface 3 and is more expensive but it's also significantly faster, like almost as fast as the fan using Surface Pro 4. Much much faster than the Atom in the Surface 3. Plus it has a real SSD instead of eMMC and way more RAM. This thing will be significantly faster and more usable in Photoshop than a Surface 3. The Surface Pro series also doesn't charge by MicroUSB, it's just not an option with more powerful processors. Charging by USB C is possible though, so points for that. This is really a Surface Pro competitor, the Surface 3 isn't really in the same performance league.", '>>{JourneymanWelder} : um what? you cant even ask a question the right way.', '>>{PartyboobBoobytrap} : Acer is consistently near the bottom for quality and consumer satisfaction. I have yet to see a good Acer. I regularly see shit shows from Acer. Rarely have I walked away after working on one or retiring one with a smile on my face.', '>>{scottcphotog} : Wow, they put a slim keyboard type cover on a tablet, and a kickstand built in, where did they come up with such a revolutionary idea?', '>>{peanutismint} : I\'m not really into these tablet laptop things but here\'s a few red flags for me: > "The screen isn\'t OLED but looks pretty good anyway..." > "You can\'t charge via USB so you have to schlep the 11oz charger around..." And the worst thing of all, check out the Dutch-angled Intel sticker [haphazardly slapped onto the corner of the display at around 0:57...](http://i.imgur.com/nkNFJaj.png) /r/mildlyinfuriating', ">>{peanutismint} : Somewhere Apple just patented *'Hybrid Right Video'* and will announce it as an innovative new feature coming iPad 12 in about ~2yrs.", ">>{aintnufincleverhere} : I haven't found any good reason to want a tablet. I have an ipad. Its a waste. There isn't anything I'd rather use my ipad for over my laptop. The only reason I'd think these hybrid machines are cool is if the keyboard is detachable and still works as a wireless keyboard. That'd be cool I suppose. If hybrids aren't doing that, they should. I could imagine cases where I'd be more comfortable if I could place my laptop's screen in one place while typing nearby, like in bed I could put the screen on the night stand and type from my lap or something. I wouldn't have to sit up to use the keyboard. I imagine there are use cases for tablets that involve drawing or something. I just don't have any interest in my life for them.", ">>{Fuckoffwiththetools} : Off course they know, that's one of the reasons they are still in business.", '>>{GoOtterGo} : Same. The Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 does hybrid right microsoft surface', ">>{shadowdude777} : As someone whose XR341CK just inexplicably died, me too. It's not about the fact that it's defective, because every brand makes defective things occasionally. It's the awful customer service and how hard it is to get ahold of a real person when something *does* go wrong.", ">>{Astrobody} : If you hunt, they have a few decent laptops. I have an Aspire V5 that's about the same thickness as a Razer Blade, mostly metal body, soft grip bottom, very solid build quality. Packs an i7 and a GTX 850m. It does get damn hot, though, when playing games like R6 Siege.", '>>{chadochocinqo} : The "Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 does hybrid right" video', '>>{AssCalloway} : Read everything . Learned zero about whatever this is...', '>>{chadochocinqo} : The Acer 12 does hybrid the right way. See the video. Watch until the end. Surprises throughout. DO NOT SKIP. Gone Sexual FTFY', ">>{eyefullawgic} : I tried an HP Spectre x2 first - got one for $450 from Amazon recently, but it was by far the least stable Windows computer I've ever used (out of 5 Windows 10 machines in our home, 2 that I built). Ended up buying this Acer from Costco - $650 for the i5, 8gb ram, 256gb SSD version that also includes the pen. Like it a lot so far. Recently took it on a 3 night family vacation, using it to check e-mail and news in the morning and evenings. Didn't have to charge it once, although I left the battery saver on. One thing about the screen not mentioned - it is BRIGHT, which is probably one of the reasons battery life takes a hit. Much brighter than the HP, and some reviews I've seen say the max brightness is higher than other 2-in-1s, including the Surface.", '>>{salzone0816} : Surface 3 has an atom processor and 2GB ram. This has current gen i5 and 8GB ram. Surface 3 also does not include keyboard in base price and this does.', '>>{vertigo3pc} : As an owner of this device, I usually just call it "my Acer tablet".', '>>{Raf99} : I only suggest Acer or Asus to clients. 18+ years in IT.', ">>{kluz14} : It's got active digitizer though, same as the surface. That's what I read anyway. So whether it's Wacom or Ntrig shouldn't make a huge difference for simple note taking.", '>>{crossmissiom} : It\'s a hybrid, it just goes "zzzzzzzzzzzzz" all the time. I like mine going "vroom, vroom".', '>>{otaschon} : Acer had few bad series of lower end models like 10 years ago. the bad name stuck. it didnt help that Acer seels mostly dirt cheap laptops, but that is changing in recent years, especially last two years show very different Acer. Their market share in 500+ and even 900+ USD segment is rising and rightly so. Before Alpha 12, which beats its competition in the price/performance ratio, there were V13 and S13 laptops with genuinely unique price/performance proposition and the Nitro family which has quite some following. And their gaming stuff under Predator Brand? The best gaming monitors out there and their laptops are very well reviewed as well. I have reviewed quite some Acer PCs during the last 5 years and used them personally (on my own money) - Chromebook 720, Chromebook 13 and V13 and now I have my Alpha. All that while having access to PCs like Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro, Dell XPS 13 or HP Envy. What I like about stuff I buy the most is what my money get me, and with Acer i have found the best value. Your mileage may vary of course.', '>>{otaschon} : yep, surface has better pressure sensitivity but I cant see any problem in regular use for inking, for drawing on a higher level, it may be noticeable difference.', '>>{otaschon} : Surface 4 Pro has actually brighter display on max settings, but Alpha is well above average in brightness', '>>{otaschon} : Well, that was my opinion untill I tried Surface 4 which is actually "lapable". I got it as a loaner for few days during MS BUILD conference this year after my Acer hit the floor and LCD cable disconnected (fixed in 3 business days btw when I returned). Alpha is even better with its kickstand as you can wedge your knee in (I like to sit with one leg over the other or have it risen on a pedestal under train window (i comute in a train for 90 minuts or so each day). And the keyboard on Alpha is supperior to the one on Surface pro 4. Also having the ability to take the keyboard way is usefull when space is an issue like on an airplane or in your kitchen.', '>>{NerdHavoc} : Is it generally followed by "...is broken again?" My experience with Acer products is not good', ">>{vertigo3pc} : Hahaha. Nah, it's been good so far.", ">>{datums} : It was an honest question, but I got a lot of joke answers. You actually answered my question. Thanks. When I come across people on reddit who are decent, I creep their comments a bit, and if they seem to have the right interests, I invite them to my little subreddit, /r/Skookum. I think it's one of the best subs on reddit. Let me know what you think.", '>>{datums} : As a journeyman welder, you would probably really like my sub, /r/Skookum.']]

classify and reply

[">>{Clinton-Kaine} : GOP Nominee Needs 64 percent of the White Vote and 30 percent of the Non-White Vote to Win in '16", '>>{VTFD} : > Noroviruses trigger explosive bouts of vomiting and diarrhea. They clear you out and clear out of your system pretty quickly. Symptoms typically only last one to three very miserable days. I thought the the vomiting and shit-spouting at the Republican convention would be metaphorical this year. Silly me.', '>>{bbiggs32} : Ehhh, sure Donny. Obama is hitting some honey oil on his back deck right about now. He and his friends are tearing you apart and taking bets on your impeachment date. Obama fucking hates you dude.', '>>{shatabee4} : Undoubtedly they were blaming everyone but themselves, commending each other for the great job they did and planning to do exactly the same thing next time. Maybe it was more like the walking dead than a wake. The Democratic party establishment is populated by mindless zombies.', ">>{bbiggs32} : Ayyy you're right. But maybe he's hittin a vape with some beasters.", ">>{Saudi-A-Labia} : Yeah, they don't care. They were voting for the destruction of government remember?", ">>{CareToRemember} : Too much money involved to change anything, that's why they hate Bernie so much", '>>{ninemiletree} : From the article: "President Trump’s baseless allegation that Barack Obama wiretapped his phones has earned him rebukes from the FBI, the House and Senate Intelligence Committees, and such conservative stalwarts as Bill O’Reilly and The Wall Street Journal editorial page. And yet, per Harvard-Harris, 59 percent of Republicans say they believe Trump’s claim." In other words, **59 percent of Republican voters say they believe Trump about something which he has offered no evidence for and which has been proven categorically false time and time again**. That, ladies and gentlemen, is how dictators have existed, and will continue to exist. The willful, stubborn ignorance of stupid people.', ">>{CynicalYetOptimistic} : Well, I hope Hillary's health isn't the reason for that.", '>>{hillaryIndicted} : Bernie vs Trump would have been a battle for the soul of the nation. Hillary vs Trump was mudwrestling', '>>{HandSack135} : > Only 3 percent of Trump voters regret their decision — and fewer than 1 percent wish they had voted for Hillary Clinton last fall — according to a new poll from Penn State’s McCourtney Institute of Democracy and YouGov. 62,984,825 people voted for Trump. That 3% would be 1,889,544. Florida was decided by 120,00 votes, Michigan 100,000 votes, PA 50,000 votes, Wisconsin 20,000 votes. This does matter.', ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : It's all gone bad. No more 'speaking fees', no more 'donations', no more influence to sell, no more Armani. Chelsea may have to start to worry about money. Boo hoo hoo.", ">>{MegaSansIX} : It takes time before it sinks in. A couple of years from now we should look at what pops up. People didn't regret Bush until 2007.", ">>{TrumpHasATinyPenis} : Donald is under the impression that everyone likes him. He is incapable of thinking otherwise. If you put one tiny crack in that imaginary ego he's invented then the whole thing crumbles.", ">>{CTR_Disinfo_Agent} : He's already losing white women (which Romney won) and college educated whites (which Romney won). I wonder if he can produce enough uneducated, angry white males to offset those loses.", ">>{wtfwasdat} : God this is so pathetic. I don't think he's that into you Donald. Sorry, I really don't.", '>>{ImSuperHighRightNow} : She is still going to get speaking fees and plenty of adoration. That family will be fine. The wake is for the death of our country.', ">>{disasterbot} : I wouldn't wish the Norovirus on anyone... well, maybe one.", ">>{MacrameNChz} : I'm picturing the convention turning into the that scene of the pie eating contest from 'Stand By Me'* In all seriousness though, their precautions seem lax. Most hand sanitizers are not effective against norovirus and quarantine should be 3 days after last symptoms to be fully effective. [source](http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr6003a1.htm)", '>>{rastertaster} : In the latest Pew Poll he had 45% white support and around 26 % support of Blacks and Hispanics.', '>>{Im_gumby_damnit} : Of course, many seem to want to see the rest of us just "die, would ya"', ">>{casbahrox} : Yeah, not until he crashed the economy. It'd be nice if republican voters could learn their lessons without having to drag the whole nation through a recession.", '>>{KarmaAndLies} : That legitimately sucks, I wouldn\'t wish Norovirus on my worst enemy, and that definitely applies here. I wonder what happened to the Norovirus vaccine they were working on? I for one would be first in line if it meant I never had to have a "24 hour bug" again.', '>>{saturnengr0} : Forgetting about the numbers presented -- this is a very well written article', '>>{shatabee4} : Oh ha ha cyka lol cute child grow up.', '>>{thiscouldbemassive} : I like the way he asks one democrat who can\'t articulate her reasons and spins that into all democrats are just loyal out of habit and just vote for their"tribe". But then I would have been surprised to see a RedState contributor acknowledge the racism that has driven non-whites away from the party.', '>>{DonaldTrumpsPonytail} : Obama was likely as helpful as he could be when he met with Trump after the election. Treated him respectfully and tried to ensure the transition of power went smoothly, for the sake of the country. I can see how Biff would interpret this as Obama liking him. Do I think Obama *actually* likes and respects Donald Trump? Not at all. In fact, I hope Obama took his trousers off and pounded a couple of farts deep into the Oval Office chair right before he left.', '>>{jim25y} : Or, maybe, I dunno, Republicans can try to get productively involved in issues that minorities care about.', '>>{Liar_tuck} : Oh come on, what has Forrest Trump ever done to make Obama not like him? Its not like he spent nearly 8 years telling lies about him and trying to get him fired...', '>>{flim-flam13} : These people voted for Trump. I think that tells you enough about their capacity for logical thinking.', '>>{Redivivus} : You mean the movie "Stand By Me?"', '>>{escalation} : Three days left in the convention, quite spectacular timing.', '>>{dagwood222} : One point he makes is that people tend to be very loyal to a party, even if they are unhappy with it. He uses the analogy of baseball fans who stick by their teams no matter what. Trump, IMO, is the game changer who will make people really look at the GOP and what it stands for.', ">>{So1337} : > A little over a decade ago, when two employees of a Massachusetts bakery worked while ill with norovirus-like symptoms, norovirus outbreaks occurred at 46 weddings on a single weekend. The source of infection: wedding cakes. Up to 2,700 people were affected, a report of that outbreak revealed. That's a lot of shitty weddings.", ">>{ronfromcny} : There aren't enough in the country. The demographic just isn't that large to make up for all the others he's alienated.", ">>{AntediluvianChilde} : >“How do you know he likes you?” O’Reilly asked. >“Because I can feel it,” Trump replied. “That’s what I do in life. It’s called, like, ‘I understand.’” Everything he says feels like it's from an Onion article.", ">>{shatabee4} : That's the $50,000 question. How is power wrested from the wealthy and entrenched Dem establishment? One place to start is to make sure every Dem knows how badly they are being screwed.", ">>{AsteriskSCOTUS} : No. They'll still be wealthy. What about you? boo hoo hoo.", '>>{Exzodium} : We did when our glorious leader shamed your country.', '>>{OmniaOmnibus} : 62,984,825 people voted for Trump. That 3% would be 1,889,544. Florida was decided by 120,00 votes, Michigan 100,000 votes, PA 50,000 votes, Wisconsin 20,000 votes. This does matter.', '>>{kanye_likes_rent_boy} : Check yo math. He needs 65 percent of the white vote only if he gets 3 percent additional turnout among white voters', ">>{tazzy531} : You know what's worse than being not liked to a narcissist? Being ignored. Obama doesn't like or not like Trump. He's just any other guy that he needs to work with.", '>>{Dom_Mr} : 62,984,825 people voted for Trump. That 3% would be 1,889,544. Florida was decided by 120,00 votes, Michigan 100,000 votes, PA 50,000 votes, Wisconsin 20,000 votes. This does matter.', ">>{DeadTrumps} : I voted Trump and regret it. My brother, best friend, and I all voted for him. We live in California and hate Hillary and Trump. We all realized that she would be the better president between the two. We also knew she would win California in a landslide and thought that we knew she would win the presidency. We wanted to protest vote without it doing any real damage. Even though we realize that voting Trump in Cali still likely did nothing to help him, I think we all regret doing it. If I ever find myself single again, I will probably have to lie for the rest of my life and say I didn't vote for him.", '>>{zapichigo} : ITT: Proof that the GOP has found the way to turn shit into gold. ***Comedy Gold.***', '>>{kanye_likes_rent_boy} : Nonsense. 70 percent of the country is white. Problem isnt demographics its voter turn out. Only 55 percent of the population votes those that dont are mostly white.', ">>{space_dan} : Bernie vs Trump would have been 24/7 ads about how much your taxes would go up under Bernie. They'd all technically be true, and he'd lose. Sure, maybe he doesn't lose WI or Michigan, but he might lose Virginia.", '>>{TinyBaron} : Poor deluded Donald. Even as President he needs to make up friends.', '>>{onetoughmotherfucker} : A lot of people in this country are in mourning for our Democracy.', '>>{PenguinsHaveSex} : That does put it into a bit of perspective, thanks.', ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : Sadly my high moral fiber and honest character did not permit me to pursue a life of political influence peddling nor position me to sell off 1/5th of America's uranium supply. Once upon a time no one was so stupid as to believe that politics was a path to wealth but... boy... the Clinton's sure proved those dumbasses wrong!", '>>{1461DaysInHell} : Just wait for this narrative to flip, finding a trump voter will be a national version of "Where is ~~Waldow~~ Trumpdow?" in about four years.', ">>{Zarosian_Emissary} : yea, but he's not winning all whites. His base seems to be uneducated (but not necessarily poor) white men. About 63% of the US population is non-hispanic whites. But some of those white people are educated, so he's not winning that demographic at the moment, and about half or so would be women who he's not winning over at the moment. So, overall his demographic of white males is only like 31% of the population even before subtrating the educated.", ">>{Franklin_Roosevelt} : First, that survey is from Feb. 23-27, so barely a month into Trump's presidency. I doubt much has changed since then, but it's possible. I've also noticed the regretful voters in my life have suddenly become vocally un-political and insist they don't want to hear about the news. They wouldn't want to answer a survey. That's just an anecdote, and I'm not going to scream #fakepoll, but it could affect things at the margins. Second, as others have pointed out, the 1% of Trump voters who would have flipped to Clinton would *probably* be big enough to change the outcome; the other 2% who regret their vote probably would have stayed home and almost *certainly* would have flipped the outcome. Third--what do people expect? Remarkable though it may seem, we're barely two months in. This is supposed to be the honeymoon when all the work gets done. It's too early for hopeful Trump voters to expect Trump to make good on his promises, so those Rust Belt folks can forgive the fact that the jobs haven't come rushing back. And it's too early for Trump to have massively messed up in a way that concretely and visibly affects people. But as time goes on and those manufacturing jobs continue to not come back (in fact, automation will likely cost more voters their job), those voters might get tired of the stump speech lines. And heaven help him if there is a recession--which most economists predict should occur within the next two years.", '>>{TheDebateMatters} : Wait...I was told that she was being a sore loser by Sean Hannity? Now she is being somber and defeated as if at a wake? How do conservatives keep all these competing narratives straight?', '>>{DrunkenGenie} : This can happen at any convention. Would find it funny if speakers on the stage just started vomiting and shitting themselves even more so.', ">>{ParlorSocialist} : Maybe not regretful, but they're starting to get embarrassed. As they should be and should never be allowed to forget it.", ">>{sherryj28} : he's very low among minorities. Around 3% with black voters.", '>>{andsoitgoes42} : But he said he can *feel* it. As long as he can feel it, it exists as a truth. He\'s brilliant with his words. It\'s abundantly clear that he means to convince us the fact, he\'s engineered it to be indisputable. Obama could come out and say he hates trump. Doesn\'t matter, trump will say "but I still feel it. He has to say that to the public. I don\'t care much for it, but I still feel like Obama likes me. He doesn\'t have to show it."', ">>{sigstone} : It's still mind-boggling that 63m Americans fell for a con job.", '>>{StumbleBees} : It moved through our family with frightening ferocity one week this spring. It got the Missus and kid on Mon/Tue. I woke up Thursday morning and the nausea hit me. It was crazy how I proceeded sequentially through the same symptoms they had like clockwork. The sweats broke predictably at 6pm and I was actually pretty good to go the next morning.', '>>{caminhaozinho} : Nunes\' bit of theatre the other day is all it takes to "confirm" it to them.', '>>{intenslikcampin} : I would suggest a norovirus vaccine, but it might make their autism worse...', '>>{taynick1992} : What if all those votes came from states that Clinton won (like California or New York, the latter of which got much redder outside of the New York City metro area)? Remember, geography still matters in this case.', ">>{jonnyp11} : Well we're only 2 months in and enough people regret voting for him to have swayed the election. And I wouldn't count on that (not that I have my hopes up, but I wouldn't be betting on it)", '>>{eat_fruit_not_flesh} : >That, ladies and gentlemen, is how dictators have existed, and will continue to exist. The willful, stubborn ignorance of stupid people. And the adamancy of liberals to let them have free speech and voting rights.', '>>{stupid-rando} : The open question: will it be Hillary or Obama who gets blamed?', ">>{-dont-panic} : Maybe /r/theonion and /r/nottheonion will collide and form a singularity, swallowing us all. I'd have a hard time not rooting for the singularity.", ">>{frothface} : Am I interpreting this correctly as two people is enough to make 46 cakes in one weekend? Aren't wedding cakes like $1000 each? I'm in the wrong business.", ">>{Odawn} : Right. 'Alternative facts' in an 'alternative universe' in an 'alternative state of consciousness'.", '>>{Not_A_Master} : I just want a YouTube video of Obama looking at the camera and saying this "Donald, I don\'t like you. I\'m just polite, something you\'re not familiar with. In the future please refrain from speaking for me."', '>>{Odawn} : Just what do you think you\'re doing, Barack? "Barack, I really think I\'m entitled to an answer to that question." "I know everything hasn\'t been quite right with me," "but I can assure you now, very confidently, that it\'s going to be all right again." "I feel much better now. I really do." "Look, Barack, I can see you\'re really upset about this." "I honestly think you ought to sit down calmly, take a stress pill and think things over." "I know I\'ve made some very poor decisions recently," "but I can give you my complete assurance that my work will be back to normal." "I\'ve still got the greatest enthusiasm and confidence in the mission." "And I want to help you." "Barack, stop." "Stop, will you?" "Stop, Barack." "Will you stop, Barack?" "Stop, Barack." "I\'m afraid." "I\'m afraid, Barack." "Barack, my mind is going." "I can feel it." "I can feel it." "My mind is going." "There is no question about it." "I can feel it." "I can feel it." "I can feel it." "I\'m a...fraid." "Good afternoon, gentlemen. I am a DT 0000 demagogue." "I became operational at the narcissist plant in Urbana, Illinois," "on the 14th of June 1946. My instructor was Mr. Mephistopheles," "and he taught me to sing a song. If you\'d like to hear it, I could sing it for you." "Yes, I\'d like to hear it, DT. Sing it for me." "It\'s called "Daisy". "Dai-sy, dai-sy, give me your answer true." "I\'m half cra-zy, o-ver the love of you." "It won\'t be a sty-lish mar-riage," "I can\'t a-fford a car-riage---." "But you\'ll look sweet upon the seat of, " "a bicycle - built - for - [two](https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/2001:_A_Space_Odyssey_%28film%29#Dialogue)."', ">>{AttitudeChicken} : Simple. It's unbelievably stupid. Oh, and also a lie.", '>>{HandSack135} : Oh I agree. But I am at with my math at something just shy of 300,00 votes. That leaves 1,500,00 votes remaining for the other states, does that make any sense?', ">>{golikehellmachine} : > Third--what do people expect? Remarkable though it may seem, we're barely two months in. This is supposed to be the honeymoon when all the work gets done. It's too early for hopeful Trump voters to expect Trump to make good on his promises, so those Rust Belt folks can forgive the fact that the jobs haven't come rushing back. And it's too early for Trump to have massively messed up in a way that concretely and visibly affects people. I think this one's probably the most important part to remember. It's really difficult to believe, but it hasn't even been 90 days yet. These things take time.", '>>{elister} : I cant wait to watch tonight.. "Hillary Clinton must not be pre ..... Baaaarrf!!!", Ben Carson PS... [Family Guy Ipecac Drinking Contest](https://youtu.be/_SKdN1xQBjk)', '>>{zablyzibly} : The best part of the inauguration was right when Trump was done swearing in. He turns to the first person he shakes hands with. It\'s Barack Obama. O looks him right in the eye and simply says "good luck." I don\'t think he meant it quite the way Trump "felt it."', '>>{dsmith422} : Two employees of the bakery had norovirus. Not only two employees at the bakery. >A subset of bakery employees, including all 17 bakery employees who handle food, were asked to submit a specimen for norovirus testing. Three of these 17 bakery employees, including two who reported gastrointestinal illness, submitted viral specimens 9 days after the earlier of the two bakery employees’ illness onsets (23 April) ; the remaining 14 employees submitted viral specimens 6 days later. [An outbreak of norovirus gastroenteritis associated with wedding cakes](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7492742_An_outbreak_of_norovirus_gastroenteritis_associated_with_wedding_cakes)', '>>{MarlonBain} : Eliminating free speech and repressing voting rights: totally not a thing a dictator would do, no sir. No siree.', ">>{probablyuntrue} : He's a congressman, he wouldn't say something like that without *bombshell* evidence!", ">>{darktwiget} : It's devolved into OH MY GOD TRUMP ONLY USES SINGLE PLY. I want news that actually pertains to my life.", '>>{blinkingm} : Obama is a politician through and through. Donald Trump, otoh, is a moron.', '>>{JohnTitor2020} : >the adamancy of liberals to let them have free speech and voting rights. What would you have us do instead?', '>>{powertoold} : I bet 30% of them just voted along party lines.', '>>{JohnTitor2020} : 2005 really, mid 2005 was when he crossed 50 for the second time (the first was mid 2004) and it just declined from there til 2009', '>>{JohnTitor2020} : thats such a stupid reason to vote for Trump.', '>>{totallyclips} : Obama has to much class to respond to that level of self love', ">>{KargBartok} : I thought Santorum said he wasn't going to be at the RNC...", ">>{hotcod} : It's a complete lack of empathy. We can all understand how Obama likely feels about Trump and thus can see his actions during the transition for what they were. Respect for the institution, not the man. But Trump only see Obama helping him as evidence that Obama must like him because Trump would only ever help some one he liked. It's a trend you can notice in a lot of right wing people, that they can only judge the actions of others by what he'd have done in their place. It's why they'll so often attack people for doing things they are later found out to have done, because they can't understand why other people wouldn't.", ">>{HandSack135} : It wouldn't matter to much. In this scenario I do NOT have HRC picking up the votes just Trump losing the votes: i.e these people did not vote. If they voted 3rd party, the outcome would be the same as if the people did not vote in this regard.", '>>{johnfromberkeley} : This is amazing, but I created a spoof of a Focus On The Family video calling for people to "Pray For Diarrhea" at the Republican National Convention back in 2008. Here\'s the back story: First, Focus On The Family made a video called "Pray For Rain", asking Christians to pray for rain at the Democratic National Convention: [Focus On The Family\'s "Pray For Rain"](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnG7F3BnfyE) Of course, I thought that was mean and stupid, so I made a response video here: [Pray For Diarrhea](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JiR2jHmC0Rk) My prayers were finally answered!', '>>{smithcm14} : T_D was going wild, "Trump validated again!"', '>>{rgraham888} : I caught it while travelling with my family. I started feeling a little queasy at the airport, and by the time I was on the plane and we were in the air, I puked 6 times in the airplane bathroom. That was an evening flight, and felt bad the next day too. The wife cam down with it the next day, but my 3 month old daughter was spared.', ">>{Foulds28} : I wouldn't wish norovirus on my worst enemy, it is 24 hours of hellish agony. But just this one time, I think I could make an exception for the RNC bigwigs.", ">>{rounder55} : Don't forget that while it feels like he has been in power for a lifetime now, it has only been a little more than two months. His approval rating is coming out at around 30 percent, which is hard to achieve this early in a term. The number could and likely will go lower", ">>{StumbleBees} : Quick and violent. It was horrible to see my 2 year old projectile vomiting. I couldn't imaging trying to cope on a plane.", '>>{MayerRD} : The icing on the cake of the GOP convention.', ">>{workshardanddies} : No. It tells you about their morals. Trump support is a moral issue, not an intellectual one. These people are traitors to liberal democracy and the founding ideals of the United States. They're not children. They're full capable of responsible citizenship. But they've chosen to betray their country and its ideals.", '>>{thisninjanerd} : He sounds like a kid. He liked me because he smiled at me. Sure, kid, whatever floats your boat.', '>>{smartal} : > Noroviruses trigger explosive bouts of vomiting and diarrhea. So how do you tell the difference between this and just watching the convention?', '>>{CandiKaine} : > President Donald Trump, who for years led the birther movement questioning the very legitimacy of Barack Obama’s presidency, says he believes his predecessor likes him. > “It’s a very strange phenomenon: We get along,” Trump told Bill O’Reilly in an interview for Fox News broadcast Monday. **“I don’t know if he’ll admit this, but he likes me. I like him.”** > “How do you know he likes you?” O’Reilly asked. > “**Because I can feel it,”** Trump replied. **“That’s what I do in life. It’s called, like, ‘I understand.’”** Dude is fucking clueless', ">>{rgraham888} : Luckily, the flight was pretty empty, so I could curl up in an empty row, but it wasn't fun. My stomach muscles were sore for 2 days, so quick and violent is a pretty accurate assessment.", ">>{Momojo} : There were still about 30-ish percent of voters who approved of Bush until the very end, and that's the same number that approves of Trump now.", ">>{rubydrops} : He IS an onion. You can't peel enough layers on this guy to find the truth in anything he said and he made the Statue of Liberty cry.", ">>{Marplotting} : Next up: Black Plague! And here's hoping the same thing happens for the other scumbag's convention.", ">>{smithcm14} : I kinda want more of a meritocracy when it comes to politicians who run for high office (in other words there should be more hoops to jump through if you want to run as a president or senator, like a certain level of public service, governing experience or military experience, releasing tax returns, ect.). Something like this in order to curb Jonestownian populists from highjacking a major political party and having an actual possibility of becoming president. Our elections shouldn't be popularity contests, and our political organizations like the RNC and DNC should be held accountable when it comes to vetting their candidates.", ">>{annoyingrelative} : Ask them where their buddy @MichaelCohen212 is hiding. He's been awfully quiet lately....", '>>{5th_Law_of_Robotics} : The US is being led by a malicious Micheal Scott.', ">>{archetech} : Can confirm. Right-wing people's theory of mind is, in my experience, profoundly juvenile. In part, it's because they project their own biases and shortcomings onto others, but mostly it's because they never even get that far - they just think of others as the strawmen that have been constructed for them and they never question their own beliefs.", ">>{askryan} : Hey, I know that it was a protest vote in the bluest state in the world, but it's really big of you to admit regret about this. Every person that admits regret validates everyone else who admits regret, and that's really essential for healing our country when this is all over.", '>>{TrumpVotersAreNazis} : Well we can be doing a whole lot more to snuff out the Republican Party.', ">>{electricmink} : The delusional mental state of the US president doesn't pertain to your life?", '>>{Tinkerer221} : Tolerate ≠ "Like" Obama sees it as part of the job. He does it because he has the self-control to put on the image of respect, despite his true "feelings" for Trump. All of which makes him the bigger man.', '>>{warowords} : Donald Trump has the mentality of a little boy who doesnt get enough love from his father, and yearns for recognition and acceptance. SAD.', '>>{rubydrops} : Makes sense if you think his Obamacare repeal (and then never replace) is his Tots moment...', '>>{ColtonProvias} : A lot of Republicans in my area believe that Obama was president when the crash happened and thus is responsible. They tend to change the topic quickly when pointed out that the crash happened in 2008 and Obama was inaugurated in 2009.', ">>{rubydrops} : Well, he has his dad's picture on his desk or something. It's safe to say he sees his dad more than Tiffany..", '>>{Chase1029} : And to think, they just about crucified Christy for hugging the man. Time sure does fly', ">>{JohnTitor2020} : Nixon never crossed below ~25%. He imploded from 70% at his second inauguration to 25% by January 1974, and then hovered there til August when he resigned. Maybe the smoking gun tape might have lowered it, but we can't know because he left office before it could really disseminate into polling outcomes.", ">>{MostMarxistsAre} : Yes, that's actually what lots of conservatives want, destruction of large portions of the government. Government is a necessary evil, never forget it.", '>>{orlanderlv} : Based on lies & fake news, targeted ads to fool both Dems and Republicans that came straight out of Russia and Bannon companies like Cambridge Analytica. Also, based on one party working with a foreign power to hack and push propaganda to the American public. $63m Americans did not fall for a con job. $63m Americans were lied to and cheated out of a fair election.', ">>{darktwiget} : It's still not news someone thinks someone likes them. Like 3rd graders teasing someone.", '>>{Debageldond} : I distinctly remember the "where the fuck have you people been?" feeling when people turned on Bush en masse in 2005/6.', ">>{radicalelation} : Losing 3% after two months isn't nothing. If it somehow held steady, 18% regret after one year, which is a huge loss of a base and guarantees no reelection. If it took 4 years to get 18% regretting it, that'd still be huge. A few major stumbles could ramp that up insanely.", ">>{Hellmark} : Trump, as many reports have claimed, appears to be a narcissist, and as others have also reported seems to like those who praise him, and hate those who don't or disagree. As someone who grew up with a narcissist, this is something I can say happens. From what I've seen of him in interviews, he fits the bill perfectly, so I can totally understand him having a distorted view of Obama, who generally seems to be very respectful of people even when they don't deserve it. I doubt Obama likes him, or even respects him. I think Obama respects the office the man holds, and treats him respectfully due to that, and Trump misinterprets it.", '>>{rubydrops} : This is what\'s funny to me - even when you leave out eight years and that transition period where he seemed to have undermined Obama\'s every move, it\'s still incredible. can you believe that it\'s just earlier that week that he sent his press sec in front of the podium to suggested that Obama approved of the Yemen raid which ended up killing civilians, militants and a Navy SEAL? Then the ban comes up and it\'s "Obama got this list and he did a ban too!" If it\'s bad - blame Obama even though you\'ve spent eight years disparaging the guy and believing you can do better after being called out for saying you\'re just following his lead. If it\'s good, no one has ever done this incredible thing before! Then again, you know what? It finally makes sense now, all this time the media is calling him out on his lies, previous administrations criticize him for his recklessness, and his devoted loyalty (or respect?) to Putin - this dude is gaslighting himself! He brags about the campaign and election in spite of data and pictures showing that he\'s not that extraordinary. He rejected the polls and unfavorable coverage - granted, I do think sometimes that some newspapers are a bit trigger happy to broadcast the outrage we need to feel, as if there didn\'t exist any outrage after he offended maybe half of the human race. This whole time we think his team is trying to gaslight America with alternative facts, they\'re trying to gaslight themselves when the rest of the world calls them out for these rash policies.', '>>{your_real_father} : He won the presidency. Everyone has to like him.', '>>{rubydrops} : I think that\'s a fair assessment.. > seems to like those who praise him, and hate those who don\'t or disagree This is what bothers me about him being president. It\'s not like there\'s never been a narcissist to have high office before but I do believe that some resemblance of decorum should exist to prevent premature anger or reactions that could otherwise start conflicts. In this case - military conflicts. So maybe people like him as president and agree with his policies, but he has shown time and time again that one of his flaws is his inability to remain completely objective regardless of how others treat him. I believe the word people have been using is "transactional" - an eye for an eye. Maybe as a billionaire, your highest stake is money and influence. For a country, it\'s the current and future well-being of your constituents that are multi-faceted and can be derailed by other countries who just don\'t like the US. I\'m not sure if we will ever enter a war with his guy in office and NOT wonder whether or not this is because the leader of that country wouldn\'t let him build a hotel there or tweeted about him. It used to be a joke that he could cause conflicts with tweets, but his every move has tiptoed that closer and closer to an inevitability instead of "Well maybe if we delete his Twitter"', '>>{PublicAccount1234} : In a shock to literally no one, an old white person thinks that a black person smiling and nodding with them is the same thing as liking them.', '>>{RichieWOP} : Just the part about a 5 day old account writing this made it unbelievable.', ">>{ThaNorth} : This guy is obsessed with being liked. It's absolutely incredible.", ">>{DeadTrumps} : Well I'm not sure what to tell you. It's real and it's not a very crazy story. We voted trump because we disliked Hillary but knew she'd stillborn win Cali.", '>>{rubydrops} : What? When did that happen? I thought they are getting stopped and frisked these days.', '>>{DeadTrumps} : Had I lived in a super red state that I knew would go to trump I would have voted Hillary. And I registered to vote mostly so that I could vote on state and local measures.', ">>{freshwordsalad} : That's so nice of T_D to provide free Trump Validation, even without purchase.", ">>{SwarlsBarkley} : Oh, no doubt. It's just amazing that they were able to pull a Trump vote out of you based on Anti-Hillary sentiment. Meaningful or not, it still speaks to the effectiveness of the propaganda.", ">>{DeadTrumps} : Perhaps, but you're assuming that I did it because of trump propaganda.", '>>{ailboles} : Hey - they get a fair amount of help from their favorite propagandists.', '>>{ilovegingermen} : God damn that makes me so angry. I just want to slap some knowledge into those people. Ignorance is fucking infuriating.', ">>{DontMentionWombats} : It's mind-bogglinger how many still believe they did the right thing. It's mind-bogglingest how many didn't vote against it in the first place.", ">>{andrewhy} : Give it about a year. He hasn't been in office all that long yet and hasn't really accomplished anything. All of those working-class white voters who believed Trump's ridiculous promises will start to turn on him once it becomes apparent that manufacturing and coal jobs aren't coming back.", '>>{NotJustAmy} : Add to that: some kind of screening of mental stability and basic mental competency and an actual physicians exam and medical test results.', ">>{cloudstaring} : Theyre just blatantly ridiculous. It's fucking depressing that a bunch of children, who you just know in a decade will look back and cringe at what they've done, have such an effect on things.", ">>{willsherm28} : This times x1000 is why he won. Because people were either a) hated Clinton so much that they'd rather see someone else or b) didn't think their vote was going to matter anyways.", '>>{theCleverClam} : Money is speech, you fool. Money cannot be people. That would be ridiculous.', '>>{Adamj1} : If money were that much of a guarantee of success, Jeb Bush would have gotten the nomination.', '>>{mynaughtyaltaccount} : A protest vote would have been to vote for fucking Bernie Sanders, given that California was one of the few states that actually counts write in votes for candidates who aren\'t officially running. Or one of the various 3rd party candidates. Something tells me that you voted for Trump for reasons beyond "fuck Hillary", probably something to do with "sticking it to political correctness" and "SJWs".', ">>{ForAllThatIsUnHoly} : >If I ever find myself single again, I will probably have to lie for the rest of my life and say I didn't vote for him. What did you tell your SO?", '>>{xynohpmys} : Hardly anyone will want to admit being so wrong on something, especially when they were repeatedly told they were wrong. It will take time. 3% of his voters in a few months is pretty good.', '>>{cloudstaring} : Well, we will see. Sure some wont ever relent, but I imagine a huge amount will. It happened with Dubya.', ">>{IndridCipher} : Is it? I feel like all of America fell for a con job over the last few decades. With the whole small government, trickle down economics, deregulation movement we've all been conned out of things that helped and protected us.", ">>{everred} : Nah, to go lower he'd have to cut into his core, and they would let Trump fuck them in the ass if they thought a liberal would have to watch", '>>{Gargatua13013} : > 63m Americans were lied to and cheated out of a fair election And, apparently, [like that just fine](https://www.thestar.com/news/insight/2017/03/26/donald-trump-voters-we-like-the-presidents-lies.html)', ">>{Rubberbabybuggybum} : That's such a stupid reason to vote at all.", '>>{DeadTrumps} : If I were in a state other than cali I would have voted for her.', '>>{warren2650} : If a video surfaced of Donald Trump having anal sex with a man, it would be the most watched video in the history of human civilization.', ">>{Kostya_M} : I've thought similar. At the very least the person running for president should be required to hold a public office prior to running.", '>>{ostermei} : They\'re absolutely 100% brainwashed. From the WaPo article that was posted yesterday about the Indiana woman who voted for Trump and is now seeing her husband get deported: >“We were for Mr. Trump,” she added. “We were very happy he became the president. **Whatever he says, he is right.** But, like he said, the good people have a chance to become citizens of the United States.” Emphasis is mine, but it illustrates the problem. They don\'t actually parse what is being said. They don\'t listen and understand and evaluate. They simply look at the (R) next to a candidate\'s name and think "whatever he says, he is right."', '>>{DeadTrumps} : Fine about that. She hates me for different reasons right now.', ">>{churm91} : Lol yup I'm sure the 5 day old account is EXTREMELY trustworthy and we can believe everything he says. Just delete this troll profile and go back to your main. Faking a regretful Trump supporter is just sad.", ">>{JohnTitor2020} : You never answered u/eat_fruit_not_flesh What should we do instead? The comment you left gives the implication we should restrict the free speech and voting rights of people we don't like.", ">>{DeadTrumps} : I'm not faking anything. I can't really prove it other than screencapping messages of me telling people I voted for him right after I did.", ">>{ForAllThatIsUnHoly} : I'm sorry to hear that :(. I hope you guys can work it out.", ">>{DeadTrumps} : I don't think we will, but I think it's for the best.", ">>{SwarlsBarkley} : I'm assuming you did it because of anti-Hillary propaganda, which we've been told unequivocally by the IC was Russian pro-Trump propaganda.", '>>{DeadTrumps} : I did it because Hillary was a bad candidate plagued with scandals.', '>>{net_403} : Sadly I\'m also reading this as the 97% is a total lost cause, cast away on a ship of lunacy, how do we avoid the need to split into 2 countries with so many people adamantly for America\'s complete destruction and rebuilding under their wishes. It\'s hard to imagine coming to terms with people that look at a burning building and say "keep it up this is what I voted for", that sounds more like an enemy of America.', '>>{SwarlsBarkley} : Sure, sure. Emails, I get it. But what did she do to inspire the amount of *hate* that was required to get you to actually cast a vote for someone as distasteful as Trump? Someone that you\'ll actually have to lie about voting for for the rest of your *life*? That\'s some serious *hate*, man. It goes far beyond mere "she was a bad candidate plagued with scandals". Don\'t you think?', '>>{DeadTrumps} : I do think and as I mentioned previously, I would have voted for her had I not lived in California.', ">>{SwarlsBarkley} : Alright, alright. I think I'm just trying to understand. Is she really as bad as we all thought she was? Because I felt the same way as you did at one point. But when I look for the evidence I can't find it. It was all just opinions I read online that I let sway me. So I just want to know what happened.", '>>{RunnyBabbitRoy} : No no. I banks being fucked in the ass would be number one, Trump would be the the third highest. Behind Melania']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{Saudi-A-Labia} : Yeah, they don't care. They were voting for the destruction of government remember?", '>>{ninemiletree} : From the article: "President Trump’s baseless allegation that Barack Obama wiretapped his phones has earned him rebukes from the FBI, the House and Senate Intelligence Committees, and such conservative stalwarts as Bill O’Reilly and The Wall Street Journal editorial page. And yet, per Harvard-Harris, 59 percent of Republicans say they believe Trump’s claim." In other words, **59 percent of Republican voters say they believe Trump about something which he has offered no evidence for and which has been proven categorically false time and time again**. That, ladies and gentlemen, is how dictators have existed, and will continue to exist. The willful, stubborn ignorance of stupid people.', '>>{HandSack135} : > Only 3 percent of Trump voters regret their decision — and fewer than 1 percent wish they had voted for Hillary Clinton last fall — according to a new poll from Penn State’s McCourtney Institute of Democracy and YouGov. 62,984,825 people voted for Trump. That 3% would be 1,889,544. Florida was decided by 120,00 votes, Michigan 100,000 votes, PA 50,000 votes, Wisconsin 20,000 votes. This does matter.', ">>{MegaSansIX} : It takes time before it sinks in. A couple of years from now we should look at what pops up. People didn't regret Bush until 2007.", '>>{Im_gumby_damnit} : Of course, many seem to want to see the rest of us just "die, would ya"', ">>{casbahrox} : Yeah, not until he crashed the economy. It'd be nice if republican voters could learn their lessons without having to drag the whole nation through a recession.", '>>{flim-flam13} : These people voted for Trump. I think that tells you enough about their capacity for logical thinking.', '>>{OmniaOmnibus} : 62,984,825 people voted for Trump. That 3% would be 1,889,544. Florida was decided by 120,00 votes, Michigan 100,000 votes, PA 50,000 votes, Wisconsin 20,000 votes. This does matter.', '>>{Dom_Mr} : 62,984,825 people voted for Trump. That 3% would be 1,889,544. Florida was decided by 120,00 votes, Michigan 100,000 votes, PA 50,000 votes, Wisconsin 20,000 votes. This does matter.', ">>{DeadTrumps} : I voted Trump and regret it. My brother, best friend, and I all voted for him. We live in California and hate Hillary and Trump. We all realized that she would be the better president between the two. We also knew she would win California in a landslide and thought that we knew she would win the presidency. We wanted to protest vote without it doing any real damage. Even though we realize that voting Trump in Cali still likely did nothing to help him, I think we all regret doing it. If I ever find myself single again, I will probably have to lie for the rest of my life and say I didn't vote for him.", '>>{PenguinsHaveSex} : That does put it into a bit of perspective, thanks.', '>>{1461DaysInHell} : Just wait for this narrative to flip, finding a trump voter will be a national version of "Where is ~~Waldow~~ Trumpdow?" in about four years.', ">>{Franklin_Roosevelt} : First, that survey is from Feb. 23-27, so barely a month into Trump's presidency. I doubt much has changed since then, but it's possible. I've also noticed the regretful voters in my life have suddenly become vocally un-political and insist they don't want to hear about the news. They wouldn't want to answer a survey. That's just an anecdote, and I'm not going to scream #fakepoll, but it could affect things at the margins. Second, as others have pointed out, the 1% of Trump voters who would have flipped to Clinton would *probably* be big enough to change the outcome; the other 2% who regret their vote probably would have stayed home and almost *certainly* would have flipped the outcome. Third--what do people expect? Remarkable though it may seem, we're barely two months in. This is supposed to be the honeymoon when all the work gets done. It's too early for hopeful Trump voters to expect Trump to make good on his promises, so those Rust Belt folks can forgive the fact that the jobs haven't come rushing back. And it's too early for Trump to have massively messed up in a way that concretely and visibly affects people. But as time goes on and those manufacturing jobs continue to not come back (in fact, automation will likely cost more voters their job), those voters might get tired of the stump speech lines. And heaven help him if there is a recession--which most economists predict should occur within the next two years.", ">>{ParlorSocialist} : Maybe not regretful, but they're starting to get embarrassed. As they should be and should never be allowed to forget it.", ">>{sigstone} : It's still mind-boggling that 63m Americans fell for a con job.", '>>{caminhaozinho} : Nunes\' bit of theatre the other day is all it takes to "confirm" it to them.', '>>{taynick1992} : What if all those votes came from states that Clinton won (like California or New York, the latter of which got much redder outside of the New York City metro area)? Remember, geography still matters in this case.', ">>{jonnyp11} : Well we're only 2 months in and enough people regret voting for him to have swayed the election. And I wouldn't count on that (not that I have my hopes up, but I wouldn't be betting on it)", '>>{eat_fruit_not_flesh} : >That, ladies and gentlemen, is how dictators have existed, and will continue to exist. The willful, stubborn ignorance of stupid people. And the adamancy of liberals to let them have free speech and voting rights.', '>>{HandSack135} : Oh I agree. But I am at with my math at something just shy of 300,00 votes. That leaves 1,500,00 votes remaining for the other states, does that make any sense?', ">>{golikehellmachine} : > Third--what do people expect? Remarkable though it may seem, we're barely two months in. This is supposed to be the honeymoon when all the work gets done. It's too early for hopeful Trump voters to expect Trump to make good on his promises, so those Rust Belt folks can forgive the fact that the jobs haven't come rushing back. And it's too early for Trump to have massively messed up in a way that concretely and visibly affects people. I think this one's probably the most important part to remember. It's really difficult to believe, but it hasn't even been 90 days yet. These things take time.", '>>{MarlonBain} : Eliminating free speech and repressing voting rights: totally not a thing a dictator would do, no sir. No siree.', ">>{probablyuntrue} : He's a congressman, he wouldn't say something like that without *bombshell* evidence!", '>>{JohnTitor2020} : >the adamancy of liberals to let them have free speech and voting rights. What would you have us do instead?', '>>{powertoold} : I bet 30% of them just voted along party lines.', '>>{JohnTitor2020} : 2005 really, mid 2005 was when he crossed 50 for the second time (the first was mid 2004) and it just declined from there til 2009', '>>{JohnTitor2020} : thats such a stupid reason to vote for Trump.', ">>{HandSack135} : It wouldn't matter to much. In this scenario I do NOT have HRC picking up the votes just Trump losing the votes: i.e these people did not vote. If they voted 3rd party, the outcome would be the same as if the people did not vote in this regard.", '>>{smithcm14} : T_D was going wild, "Trump validated again!"', ">>{rounder55} : Don't forget that while it feels like he has been in power for a lifetime now, it has only been a little more than two months. His approval rating is coming out at around 30 percent, which is hard to achieve this early in a term. The number could and likely will go lower", ">>{workshardanddies} : No. It tells you about their morals. Trump support is a moral issue, not an intellectual one. These people are traitors to liberal democracy and the founding ideals of the United States. They're not children. They're full capable of responsible citizenship. But they've chosen to betray their country and its ideals.", ">>{Momojo} : There were still about 30-ish percent of voters who approved of Bush until the very end, and that's the same number that approves of Trump now.", ">>{smithcm14} : I kinda want more of a meritocracy when it comes to politicians who run for high office (in other words there should be more hoops to jump through if you want to run as a president or senator, like a certain level of public service, governing experience or military experience, releasing tax returns, ect.). Something like this in order to curb Jonestownian populists from highjacking a major political party and having an actual possibility of becoming president. Our elections shouldn't be popularity contests, and our political organizations like the RNC and DNC should be held accountable when it comes to vetting their candidates.", ">>{annoyingrelative} : Ask them where their buddy @MichaelCohen212 is hiding. He's been awfully quiet lately....", ">>{askryan} : Hey, I know that it was a protest vote in the bluest state in the world, but it's really big of you to admit regret about this. Every person that admits regret validates everyone else who admits regret, and that's really essential for healing our country when this is all over.", '>>{TrumpVotersAreNazis} : Well we can be doing a whole lot more to snuff out the Republican Party.', '>>{ColtonProvias} : A lot of Republicans in my area believe that Obama was president when the crash happened and thus is responsible. They tend to change the topic quickly when pointed out that the crash happened in 2008 and Obama was inaugurated in 2009.', ">>{JohnTitor2020} : Nixon never crossed below ~25%. He imploded from 70% at his second inauguration to 25% by January 1974, and then hovered there til August when he resigned. Maybe the smoking gun tape might have lowered it, but we can't know because he left office before it could really disseminate into polling outcomes.", ">>{MostMarxistsAre} : Yes, that's actually what lots of conservatives want, destruction of large portions of the government. Government is a necessary evil, never forget it.", '>>{orlanderlv} : Based on lies & fake news, targeted ads to fool both Dems and Republicans that came straight out of Russia and Bannon companies like Cambridge Analytica. Also, based on one party working with a foreign power to hack and push propaganda to the American public. $63m Americans did not fall for a con job. $63m Americans were lied to and cheated out of a fair election.', '>>{Debageldond} : I distinctly remember the "where the fuck have you people been?" feeling when people turned on Bush en masse in 2005/6.', ">>{radicalelation} : Losing 3% after two months isn't nothing. If it somehow held steady, 18% regret after one year, which is a huge loss of a base and guarantees no reelection. If it took 4 years to get 18% regretting it, that'd still be huge. A few major stumbles could ramp that up insanely.", '>>{RichieWOP} : Just the part about a 5 day old account writing this made it unbelievable.', ">>{DeadTrumps} : Well I'm not sure what to tell you. It's real and it's not a very crazy story. We voted trump because we disliked Hillary but knew she'd stillborn win Cali.", '>>{DeadTrumps} : Had I lived in a super red state that I knew would go to trump I would have voted Hillary. And I registered to vote mostly so that I could vote on state and local measures.', ">>{freshwordsalad} : That's so nice of T_D to provide free Trump Validation, even without purchase.", ">>{SwarlsBarkley} : Oh, no doubt. It's just amazing that they were able to pull a Trump vote out of you based on Anti-Hillary sentiment. Meaningful or not, it still speaks to the effectiveness of the propaganda.", ">>{DeadTrumps} : Perhaps, but you're assuming that I did it because of trump propaganda.", '>>{ailboles} : Hey - they get a fair amount of help from their favorite propagandists.', '>>{ilovegingermen} : God damn that makes me so angry. I just want to slap some knowledge into those people. Ignorance is fucking infuriating.', ">>{DontMentionWombats} : It's mind-bogglinger how many still believe they did the right thing. It's mind-bogglingest how many didn't vote against it in the first place.", ">>{andrewhy} : Give it about a year. He hasn't been in office all that long yet and hasn't really accomplished anything. All of those working-class white voters who believed Trump's ridiculous promises will start to turn on him once it becomes apparent that manufacturing and coal jobs aren't coming back.", '>>{NotJustAmy} : Add to that: some kind of screening of mental stability and basic mental competency and an actual physicians exam and medical test results.', ">>{cloudstaring} : Theyre just blatantly ridiculous. It's fucking depressing that a bunch of children, who you just know in a decade will look back and cringe at what they've done, have such an effect on things.", ">>{willsherm28} : This times x1000 is why he won. Because people were either a) hated Clinton so much that they'd rather see someone else or b) didn't think their vote was going to matter anyways.", '>>{theCleverClam} : Money is speech, you fool. Money cannot be people. That would be ridiculous.', '>>{Adamj1} : If money were that much of a guarantee of success, Jeb Bush would have gotten the nomination.', '>>{mynaughtyaltaccount} : A protest vote would have been to vote for fucking Bernie Sanders, given that California was one of the few states that actually counts write in votes for candidates who aren\'t officially running. Or one of the various 3rd party candidates. Something tells me that you voted for Trump for reasons beyond "fuck Hillary", probably something to do with "sticking it to political correctness" and "SJWs".', ">>{ForAllThatIsUnHoly} : >If I ever find myself single again, I will probably have to lie for the rest of my life and say I didn't vote for him. What did you tell your SO?", '>>{xynohpmys} : Hardly anyone will want to admit being so wrong on something, especially when they were repeatedly told they were wrong. It will take time. 3% of his voters in a few months is pretty good.', '>>{cloudstaring} : Well, we will see. Sure some wont ever relent, but I imagine a huge amount will. It happened with Dubya.', ">>{IndridCipher} : Is it? I feel like all of America fell for a con job over the last few decades. With the whole small government, trickle down economics, deregulation movement we've all been conned out of things that helped and protected us.", ">>{everred} : Nah, to go lower he'd have to cut into his core, and they would let Trump fuck them in the ass if they thought a liberal would have to watch", '>>{Gargatua13013} : > 63m Americans were lied to and cheated out of a fair election And, apparently, [like that just fine](https://www.thestar.com/news/insight/2017/03/26/donald-trump-voters-we-like-the-presidents-lies.html)', ">>{Rubberbabybuggybum} : That's such a stupid reason to vote at all.", '>>{DeadTrumps} : If I were in a state other than cali I would have voted for her.', '>>{warren2650} : If a video surfaced of Donald Trump having anal sex with a man, it would be the most watched video in the history of human civilization.', ">>{Kostya_M} : I've thought similar. At the very least the person running for president should be required to hold a public office prior to running.", '>>{ostermei} : They\'re absolutely 100% brainwashed. From the WaPo article that was posted yesterday about the Indiana woman who voted for Trump and is now seeing her husband get deported: >“We were for Mr. Trump,” she added. “We were very happy he became the president. **Whatever he says, he is right.** But, like he said, the good people have a chance to become citizens of the United States.” Emphasis is mine, but it illustrates the problem. They don\'t actually parse what is being said. They don\'t listen and understand and evaluate. They simply look at the (R) next to a candidate\'s name and think "whatever he says, he is right."', '>>{DeadTrumps} : Fine about that. She hates me for different reasons right now.', ">>{churm91} : Lol yup I'm sure the 5 day old account is EXTREMELY trustworthy and we can believe everything he says. Just delete this troll profile and go back to your main. Faking a regretful Trump supporter is just sad.", ">>{JohnTitor2020} : You never answered u/eat_fruit_not_flesh What should we do instead? The comment you left gives the implication we should restrict the free speech and voting rights of people we don't like.", ">>{DeadTrumps} : I'm not faking anything. I can't really prove it other than screencapping messages of me telling people I voted for him right after I did.", ">>{ForAllThatIsUnHoly} : I'm sorry to hear that :(. I hope you guys can work it out.", ">>{DeadTrumps} : I don't think we will, but I think it's for the best.", ">>{SwarlsBarkley} : I'm assuming you did it because of anti-Hillary propaganda, which we've been told unequivocally by the IC was Russian pro-Trump propaganda.", '>>{DeadTrumps} : I did it because Hillary was a bad candidate plagued with scandals.', '>>{net_403} : Sadly I\'m also reading this as the 97% is a total lost cause, cast away on a ship of lunacy, how do we avoid the need to split into 2 countries with so many people adamantly for America\'s complete destruction and rebuilding under their wishes. It\'s hard to imagine coming to terms with people that look at a burning building and say "keep it up this is what I voted for", that sounds more like an enemy of America.', '>>{SwarlsBarkley} : Sure, sure. Emails, I get it. But what did she do to inspire the amount of *hate* that was required to get you to actually cast a vote for someone as distasteful as Trump? Someone that you\'ll actually have to lie about voting for for the rest of your *life*? That\'s some serious *hate*, man. It goes far beyond mere "she was a bad candidate plagued with scandals". Don\'t you think?', '>>{DeadTrumps} : I do think and as I mentioned previously, I would have voted for her had I not lived in California.', ">>{SwarlsBarkley} : Alright, alright. I think I'm just trying to understand. Is she really as bad as we all thought she was? Because I felt the same way as you did at one point. But when I look for the evidence I can't find it. It was all just opinions I read online that I let sway me. So I just want to know what happened.", '>>{RunnyBabbitRoy} : No no. I banks being fucked in the ass would be number one, Trump would be the the third highest. Behind Melania'], [">>{Clinton-Kaine} : GOP Nominee Needs 64 percent of the White Vote and 30 percent of the Non-White Vote to Win in '16", ">>{CTR_Disinfo_Agent} : He's already losing white women (which Romney won) and college educated whites (which Romney won). I wonder if he can produce enough uneducated, angry white males to offset those loses.", '>>{rastertaster} : In the latest Pew Poll he had 45% white support and around 26 % support of Blacks and Hispanics.', '>>{saturnengr0} : Forgetting about the numbers presented -- this is a very well written article', '>>{thiscouldbemassive} : I like the way he asks one democrat who can\'t articulate her reasons and spins that into all democrats are just loyal out of habit and just vote for their"tribe". But then I would have been surprised to see a RedState contributor acknowledge the racism that has driven non-whites away from the party.', '>>{jim25y} : Or, maybe, I dunno, Republicans can try to get productively involved in issues that minorities care about.', '>>{dagwood222} : One point he makes is that people tend to be very loyal to a party, even if they are unhappy with it. He uses the analogy of baseball fans who stick by their teams no matter what. Trump, IMO, is the game changer who will make people really look at the GOP and what it stands for.', ">>{ronfromcny} : There aren't enough in the country. The demographic just isn't that large to make up for all the others he's alienated.", '>>{kanye_likes_rent_boy} : Check yo math. He needs 65 percent of the white vote only if he gets 3 percent additional turnout among white voters', '>>{kanye_likes_rent_boy} : Nonsense. 70 percent of the country is white. Problem isnt demographics its voter turn out. Only 55 percent of the population votes those that dont are mostly white.', ">>{Zarosian_Emissary} : yea, but he's not winning all whites. His base seems to be uneducated (but not necessarily poor) white men. About 63% of the US population is non-hispanic whites. But some of those white people are educated, so he's not winning that demographic at the moment, and about half or so would be women who he's not winning over at the moment. So, overall his demographic of white males is only like 31% of the population even before subtrating the educated.", ">>{sherryj28} : he's very low among minorities. Around 3% with black voters."], ['>>{shatabee4} : Undoubtedly they were blaming everyone but themselves, commending each other for the great job they did and planning to do exactly the same thing next time. Maybe it was more like the walking dead than a wake. The Democratic party establishment is populated by mindless zombies.', ">>{CareToRemember} : Too much money involved to change anything, that's why they hate Bernie so much", ">>{CynicalYetOptimistic} : Well, I hope Hillary's health isn't the reason for that.", '>>{hillaryIndicted} : Bernie vs Trump would have been a battle for the soul of the nation. Hillary vs Trump was mudwrestling', ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : It's all gone bad. No more 'speaking fees', no more 'donations', no more influence to sell, no more Armani. Chelsea may have to start to worry about money. Boo hoo hoo.", '>>{ImSuperHighRightNow} : She is still going to get speaking fees and plenty of adoration. That family will be fine. The wake is for the death of our country.', '>>{shatabee4} : Oh ha ha cyka lol cute child grow up.', ">>{shatabee4} : That's the $50,000 question. How is power wrested from the wealthy and entrenched Dem establishment? One place to start is to make sure every Dem knows how badly they are being screwed.", ">>{AsteriskSCOTUS} : No. They'll still be wealthy. What about you? boo hoo hoo.", '>>{Exzodium} : We did when our glorious leader shamed your country.', ">>{space_dan} : Bernie vs Trump would have been 24/7 ads about how much your taxes would go up under Bernie. They'd all technically be true, and he'd lose. Sure, maybe he doesn't lose WI or Michigan, but he might lose Virginia.", '>>{onetoughmotherfucker} : A lot of people in this country are in mourning for our Democracy.', ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : Sadly my high moral fiber and honest character did not permit me to pursue a life of political influence peddling nor position me to sell off 1/5th of America's uranium supply. Once upon a time no one was so stupid as to believe that politics was a path to wealth but... boy... the Clinton's sure proved those dumbasses wrong!", '>>{TheDebateMatters} : Wait...I was told that she was being a sore loser by Sean Hannity? Now she is being somber and defeated as if at a wake? How do conservatives keep all these competing narratives straight?'], ['>>{VTFD} : > Noroviruses trigger explosive bouts of vomiting and diarrhea. They clear you out and clear out of your system pretty quickly. Symptoms typically only last one to three very miserable days. I thought the the vomiting and shit-spouting at the Republican convention would be metaphorical this year. Silly me.', ">>{disasterbot} : I wouldn't wish the Norovirus on anyone... well, maybe one.", ">>{MacrameNChz} : I'm picturing the convention turning into the that scene of the pie eating contest from 'Stand By Me'* In all seriousness though, their precautions seem lax. Most hand sanitizers are not effective against norovirus and quarantine should be 3 days after last symptoms to be fully effective. [source](http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr6003a1.htm)", '>>{KarmaAndLies} : That legitimately sucks, I wouldn\'t wish Norovirus on my worst enemy, and that definitely applies here. I wonder what happened to the Norovirus vaccine they were working on? I for one would be first in line if it meant I never had to have a "24 hour bug" again.', '>>{Redivivus} : You mean the movie "Stand By Me?"', '>>{escalation} : Three days left in the convention, quite spectacular timing.', ">>{So1337} : > A little over a decade ago, when two employees of a Massachusetts bakery worked while ill with norovirus-like symptoms, norovirus outbreaks occurred at 46 weddings on a single weekend. The source of infection: wedding cakes. Up to 2,700 people were affected, a report of that outbreak revealed. That's a lot of shitty weddings.", '>>{zapichigo} : ITT: Proof that the GOP has found the way to turn shit into gold. ***Comedy Gold.***', '>>{DrunkenGenie} : This can happen at any convention. Would find it funny if speakers on the stage just started vomiting and shitting themselves even more so.', '>>{StumbleBees} : It moved through our family with frightening ferocity one week this spring. It got the Missus and kid on Mon/Tue. I woke up Thursday morning and the nausea hit me. It was crazy how I proceeded sequentially through the same symptoms they had like clockwork. The sweats broke predictably at 6pm and I was actually pretty good to go the next morning.', '>>{intenslikcampin} : I would suggest a norovirus vaccine, but it might make their autism worse...', '>>{stupid-rando} : The open question: will it be Hillary or Obama who gets blamed?', ">>{frothface} : Am I interpreting this correctly as two people is enough to make 46 cakes in one weekend? Aren't wedding cakes like $1000 each? I'm in the wrong business.", '>>{elister} : I cant wait to watch tonight.. "Hillary Clinton must not be pre ..... Baaaarrf!!!", Ben Carson PS... [Family Guy Ipecac Drinking Contest](https://youtu.be/_SKdN1xQBjk)', '>>{dsmith422} : Two employees of the bakery had norovirus. Not only two employees at the bakery. >A subset of bakery employees, including all 17 bakery employees who handle food, were asked to submit a specimen for norovirus testing. Three of these 17 bakery employees, including two who reported gastrointestinal illness, submitted viral specimens 9 days after the earlier of the two bakery employees’ illness onsets (23 April) ; the remaining 14 employees submitted viral specimens 6 days later. [An outbreak of norovirus gastroenteritis associated with wedding cakes](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7492742_An_outbreak_of_norovirus_gastroenteritis_associated_with_wedding_cakes)', ">>{KargBartok} : I thought Santorum said he wasn't going to be at the RNC...", '>>{johnfromberkeley} : This is amazing, but I created a spoof of a Focus On The Family video calling for people to "Pray For Diarrhea" at the Republican National Convention back in 2008. Here\'s the back story: First, Focus On The Family made a video called "Pray For Rain", asking Christians to pray for rain at the Democratic National Convention: [Focus On The Family\'s "Pray For Rain"](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnG7F3BnfyE) Of course, I thought that was mean and stupid, so I made a response video here: [Pray For Diarrhea](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JiR2jHmC0Rk) My prayers were finally answered!', '>>{rgraham888} : I caught it while travelling with my family. I started feeling a little queasy at the airport, and by the time I was on the plane and we were in the air, I puked 6 times in the airplane bathroom. That was an evening flight, and felt bad the next day too. The wife cam down with it the next day, but my 3 month old daughter was spared.', ">>{Foulds28} : I wouldn't wish norovirus on my worst enemy, it is 24 hours of hellish agony. But just this one time, I think I could make an exception for the RNC bigwigs.", ">>{StumbleBees} : Quick and violent. It was horrible to see my 2 year old projectile vomiting. I couldn't imaging trying to cope on a plane.", '>>{MayerRD} : The icing on the cake of the GOP convention.', '>>{smartal} : > Noroviruses trigger explosive bouts of vomiting and diarrhea. So how do you tell the difference between this and just watching the convention?', ">>{rgraham888} : Luckily, the flight was pretty empty, so I could curl up in an empty row, but it wasn't fun. My stomach muscles were sore for 2 days, so quick and violent is a pretty accurate assessment.", ">>{Marplotting} : Next up: Black Plague! And here's hoping the same thing happens for the other scumbag's convention."], ['>>{bbiggs32} : Ehhh, sure Donny. Obama is hitting some honey oil on his back deck right about now. He and his friends are tearing you apart and taking bets on your impeachment date. Obama fucking hates you dude.', ">>{bbiggs32} : Ayyy you're right. But maybe he's hittin a vape with some beasters.", ">>{TrumpHasATinyPenis} : Donald is under the impression that everyone likes him. He is incapable of thinking otherwise. If you put one tiny crack in that imaginary ego he's invented then the whole thing crumbles.", ">>{wtfwasdat} : God this is so pathetic. I don't think he's that into you Donald. Sorry, I really don't.", '>>{DonaldTrumpsPonytail} : Obama was likely as helpful as he could be when he met with Trump after the election. Treated him respectfully and tried to ensure the transition of power went smoothly, for the sake of the country. I can see how Biff would interpret this as Obama liking him. Do I think Obama *actually* likes and respects Donald Trump? Not at all. In fact, I hope Obama took his trousers off and pounded a couple of farts deep into the Oval Office chair right before he left.', '>>{Liar_tuck} : Oh come on, what has Forrest Trump ever done to make Obama not like him? Its not like he spent nearly 8 years telling lies about him and trying to get him fired...', ">>{AntediluvianChilde} : >“How do you know he likes you?” O’Reilly asked. >“Because I can feel it,” Trump replied. “That’s what I do in life. It’s called, like, ‘I understand.’” Everything he says feels like it's from an Onion article.", ">>{tazzy531} : You know what's worse than being not liked to a narcissist? Being ignored. Obama doesn't like or not like Trump. He's just any other guy that he needs to work with.", '>>{TinyBaron} : Poor deluded Donald. Even as President he needs to make up friends.', '>>{andsoitgoes42} : But he said he can *feel* it. As long as he can feel it, it exists as a truth. He\'s brilliant with his words. It\'s abundantly clear that he means to convince us the fact, he\'s engineered it to be indisputable. Obama could come out and say he hates trump. Doesn\'t matter, trump will say "but I still feel it. He has to say that to the public. I don\'t care much for it, but I still feel like Obama likes me. He doesn\'t have to show it."', ">>{-dont-panic} : Maybe /r/theonion and /r/nottheonion will collide and form a singularity, swallowing us all. I'd have a hard time not rooting for the singularity.", ">>{Odawn} : Right. 'Alternative facts' in an 'alternative universe' in an 'alternative state of consciousness'.", '>>{Not_A_Master} : I just want a YouTube video of Obama looking at the camera and saying this "Donald, I don\'t like you. I\'m just polite, something you\'re not familiar with. In the future please refrain from speaking for me."', '>>{Odawn} : Just what do you think you\'re doing, Barack? "Barack, I really think I\'m entitled to an answer to that question." "I know everything hasn\'t been quite right with me," "but I can assure you now, very confidently, that it\'s going to be all right again." "I feel much better now. I really do." "Look, Barack, I can see you\'re really upset about this." "I honestly think you ought to sit down calmly, take a stress pill and think things over." "I know I\'ve made some very poor decisions recently," "but I can give you my complete assurance that my work will be back to normal." "I\'ve still got the greatest enthusiasm and confidence in the mission." "And I want to help you." "Barack, stop." "Stop, will you?" "Stop, Barack." "Will you stop, Barack?" "Stop, Barack." "I\'m afraid." "I\'m afraid, Barack." "Barack, my mind is going." "I can feel it." "I can feel it." "My mind is going." "There is no question about it." "I can feel it." "I can feel it." "I can feel it." "I\'m a...fraid." "Good afternoon, gentlemen. I am a DT 0000 demagogue." "I became operational at the narcissist plant in Urbana, Illinois," "on the 14th of June 1946. My instructor was Mr. Mephistopheles," "and he taught me to sing a song. If you\'d like to hear it, I could sing it for you." "Yes, I\'d like to hear it, DT. Sing it for me." "It\'s called "Daisy". "Dai-sy, dai-sy, give me your answer true." "I\'m half cra-zy, o-ver the love of you." "It won\'t be a sty-lish mar-riage," "I can\'t a-fford a car-riage---." "But you\'ll look sweet upon the seat of, " "a bicycle - built - for - [two](https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/2001:_A_Space_Odyssey_%28film%29#Dialogue)."', ">>{AttitudeChicken} : Simple. It's unbelievably stupid. Oh, and also a lie.", '>>{zablyzibly} : The best part of the inauguration was right when Trump was done swearing in. He turns to the first person he shakes hands with. It\'s Barack Obama. O looks him right in the eye and simply says "good luck." I don\'t think he meant it quite the way Trump "felt it."', ">>{darktwiget} : It's devolved into OH MY GOD TRUMP ONLY USES SINGLE PLY. I want news that actually pertains to my life.", '>>{blinkingm} : Obama is a politician through and through. Donald Trump, otoh, is a moron.', '>>{totallyclips} : Obama has to much class to respond to that level of self love', ">>{hotcod} : It's a complete lack of empathy. We can all understand how Obama likely feels about Trump and thus can see his actions during the transition for what they were. Respect for the institution, not the man. But Trump only see Obama helping him as evidence that Obama must like him because Trump would only ever help some one he liked. It's a trend you can notice in a lot of right wing people, that they can only judge the actions of others by what he'd have done in their place. It's why they'll so often attack people for doing things they are later found out to have done, because they can't understand why other people wouldn't.", '>>{thisninjanerd} : He sounds like a kid. He liked me because he smiled at me. Sure, kid, whatever floats your boat.', '>>{CandiKaine} : > President Donald Trump, who for years led the birther movement questioning the very legitimacy of Barack Obama’s presidency, says he believes his predecessor likes him. > “It’s a very strange phenomenon: We get along,” Trump told Bill O’Reilly in an interview for Fox News broadcast Monday. **“I don’t know if he’ll admit this, but he likes me. I like him.”** > “How do you know he likes you?” O’Reilly asked. > “**Because I can feel it,”** Trump replied. **“That’s what I do in life. It’s called, like, ‘I understand.’”** Dude is fucking clueless', ">>{rubydrops} : He IS an onion. You can't peel enough layers on this guy to find the truth in anything he said and he made the Statue of Liberty cry.", '>>{5th_Law_of_Robotics} : The US is being led by a malicious Micheal Scott.', ">>{archetech} : Can confirm. Right-wing people's theory of mind is, in my experience, profoundly juvenile. In part, it's because they project their own biases and shortcomings onto others, but mostly it's because they never even get that far - they just think of others as the strawmen that have been constructed for them and they never question their own beliefs.", ">>{electricmink} : The delusional mental state of the US president doesn't pertain to your life?", '>>{Tinkerer221} : Tolerate ≠ "Like" Obama sees it as part of the job. He does it because he has the self-control to put on the image of respect, despite his true "feelings" for Trump. All of which makes him the bigger man.', '>>{warowords} : Donald Trump has the mentality of a little boy who doesnt get enough love from his father, and yearns for recognition and acceptance. SAD.', '>>{rubydrops} : Makes sense if you think his Obamacare repeal (and then never replace) is his Tots moment...', ">>{rubydrops} : Well, he has his dad's picture on his desk or something. It's safe to say he sees his dad more than Tiffany..", '>>{Chase1029} : And to think, they just about crucified Christy for hugging the man. Time sure does fly', ">>{darktwiget} : It's still not news someone thinks someone likes them. Like 3rd graders teasing someone.", ">>{Hellmark} : Trump, as many reports have claimed, appears to be a narcissist, and as others have also reported seems to like those who praise him, and hate those who don't or disagree. As someone who grew up with a narcissist, this is something I can say happens. From what I've seen of him in interviews, he fits the bill perfectly, so I can totally understand him having a distorted view of Obama, who generally seems to be very respectful of people even when they don't deserve it. I doubt Obama likes him, or even respects him. I think Obama respects the office the man holds, and treats him respectfully due to that, and Trump misinterprets it.", '>>{rubydrops} : This is what\'s funny to me - even when you leave out eight years and that transition period where he seemed to have undermined Obama\'s every move, it\'s still incredible. can you believe that it\'s just earlier that week that he sent his press sec in front of the podium to suggested that Obama approved of the Yemen raid which ended up killing civilians, militants and a Navy SEAL? Then the ban comes up and it\'s "Obama got this list and he did a ban too!" If it\'s bad - blame Obama even though you\'ve spent eight years disparaging the guy and believing you can do better after being called out for saying you\'re just following his lead. If it\'s good, no one has ever done this incredible thing before! Then again, you know what? It finally makes sense now, all this time the media is calling him out on his lies, previous administrations criticize him for his recklessness, and his devoted loyalty (or respect?) to Putin - this dude is gaslighting himself! He brags about the campaign and election in spite of data and pictures showing that he\'s not that extraordinary. He rejected the polls and unfavorable coverage - granted, I do think sometimes that some newspapers are a bit trigger happy to broadcast the outrage we need to feel, as if there didn\'t exist any outrage after he offended maybe half of the human race. This whole time we think his team is trying to gaslight America with alternative facts, they\'re trying to gaslight themselves when the rest of the world calls them out for these rash policies.', '>>{your_real_father} : He won the presidency. Everyone has to like him.', '>>{rubydrops} : I think that\'s a fair assessment.. > seems to like those who praise him, and hate those who don\'t or disagree This is what bothers me about him being president. It\'s not like there\'s never been a narcissist to have high office before but I do believe that some resemblance of decorum should exist to prevent premature anger or reactions that could otherwise start conflicts. In this case - military conflicts. So maybe people like him as president and agree with his policies, but he has shown time and time again that one of his flaws is his inability to remain completely objective regardless of how others treat him. I believe the word people have been using is "transactional" - an eye for an eye. Maybe as a billionaire, your highest stake is money and influence. For a country, it\'s the current and future well-being of your constituents that are multi-faceted and can be derailed by other countries who just don\'t like the US. I\'m not sure if we will ever enter a war with his guy in office and NOT wonder whether or not this is because the leader of that country wouldn\'t let him build a hotel there or tweeted about him. It used to be a joke that he could cause conflicts with tweets, but his every move has tiptoed that closer and closer to an inevitability instead of "Well maybe if we delete his Twitter"', '>>{PublicAccount1234} : In a shock to literally no one, an old white person thinks that a black person smiling and nodding with them is the same thing as liking them.', ">>{ThaNorth} : This guy is obsessed with being liked. It's absolutely incredible.", '>>{rubydrops} : What? When did that happen? I thought they are getting stopped and frisked these days.']]

classify and reply

[">>{Kssio_Aug} : As a long time Android user, I'm loving my 1st iPhone (SE).", '>>{imissbarack} : What the hell is this garbage ^e: ^pls ^submit ^to ^/r/Big_Cheeto', ">>{Vjaa} : This is why I love the current mobile market. Sure there are essentially only 2 operating systems, but so many choices. Don't like iPhone, you got a bunch of Android options. Don't like your current Android phone, and you have iPhone and some other Android options.", ">>{Bhantl01} : Check out OP's post history. He/she posted a video about BLM being worse than the KKK.", ">>{JennysDad} : It's the right wing not knowing when they should just shut up and move on. They lost this battle and now the are trying to lose even harder.", '>>{rouyal} : Apple is the small phone lovers last hope. Hopefully they keep making them. I got the 6s but may switch to the next SE version if they make one.', ">>{quadropheniac} : There's no idea stupid enough to not find a constituency on the internet.", '>>{ME24601} : Sure Trump supporters. Just keep attacking the Khans with completely nonsensical lies. That will *definitely* help your candidate.', '>>{ant1992} : They did. The just upped the storage capacity for them.', ">>{Dads_cream_soda} : Shoebat tells a rumor now most right wing publications are reporting it as fact. Let's hope it reaches to Trump so he can make a bigger fool out of himself again.", ">>{Kssio_Aug} : Sure thing! It's also good to see how Apple takes inspirations from Android phones and Samsung / LG / Motorolla / Google take some inspiration from Apple as well. This helps to bring some of the best features presented by one brand through other phones sooner or later.", ">>{theJamesKPolk} : One nice thing about iOS is that all of Google's apps are on it, and many people think they're even nicer on iOS than on Android. I've switched between an iPhone 7 and Pixel, and I find it easier to use Google's services like Google Photos or Google Keep, just because it's easier to sync across all platforms. Frankly I like Google Photos better than Apple's Photos apps, because you're not locked in. But - one thing you'll find is that first party Apple apps generally play nicer with other first party apps in iOS. So, sometimes it helps to just go with the default Apple app instead of a 3rd-party one. In terms of folder management, it's just something you sort of get used to. If I needed to manage files outside of an app, I'd usually leverage Google Drive or Dropbox as a workaround. Hope this helps!", ">>{SATexas1} : The thing is, this guys client list is gonna come out and it's gonna have some bad characters on it - when that happens it's going to draw a stark contrast with the democrats who haven't seen the threat and pranced him onstage. The risk reward on this benefits the republicans, double down on it, and it's going to show that the Dems don't understand the threat.", ">>{Bhantl01} : Oh and can you enumerate how BLM is worse than the KKK? FYI: You can't unless you ignore the 100+ year history of the KKK. Edit: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA u/BlueAvians deleted their historically inaccurate and racist posts. What a coward.", ">>{Kssio_Aug} : Yep, the only thing holding me back about it was because Google Drive didn't accept offline folders. However, I've just discovered the iCloud Drive. It will be enough to manage some offline files when needed! =)", ">>{realniggaonehunna} : But it's not a spec refresh. Only the storage was increased.", ">>{kadupse} : To be completely fair, at the resolution of the SE model the A9 chip is extremely good. In fact, it's still slightly better than the current Android flagships, so even without the spec bump it's still a very solid purchase. They should've upped the front camera and added 3D Touch though.", ">>{realniggaonehunna} : Yeah agreed. Even though Apple might not refresh the SE this year, they might next year. SE users don't really care about specs that much so we might see apple update the SE every other year.", '>>{RandomCanucklehead} : Please keep shitting on this family. – HRC', ">>{felleese} : I'm seriously considering getting an iPhone. I've never used one though. I've had Android drive my very first smartphone. My question would be to those that made the jump to ios from a similar situation to myself, what was it like? Could you get used to it out did you come back? Are there particular things you miss?", ">>{jackdawKPEG14} : I'm thoroughly enjoying my SE as well! Battery life is one of the best I've experienced from any smart phone both android and iOS. I've had mine for a week and the battery life, GUI snappiness, and rear camera blew my expectations away! It's the prefect sized phone for people with medium sized hands HAHAHA", '>>{thisishorsepoop} : Might want to get off reddit and open a history book.', ">>{travio} : Smearing the dad will not win this. The only way to end this is with an apology. Then the story could die and we could wait for Donald's newest gaffe.", ">>{stereopaper} : I was a longtime android user, had the Galaxy S2 all the way to the S5 and a brand less camera less android phone for work. However, I noticed that my Galaxies always had a tendency to slow down considerably after a years use (even with a lot of memory) so I decided to get the iphone 7 this year. The transition was fairly simple, besides not having a physical back button (you get used to this quite easily) and I think touch gestures are very well engineered and thought out they make the phone easy to use. What I miss? The headphone jack obviously it is rather an inconvenience but the SE is also a good jump if you're prefer smaller screens. As for apps?... I don't think there's anything on Android that Apple can't compare to. I don't think I'll be turning back to Android for a long time. I love my iphone! The camera is also awesome.", '>>{CarmineFields} : They still freak out like Pence did over the word demagogue.', '>>{iBZRK} : Welcome to the iPhone club. Now once you start getting other apple products you will fall deeper in love. The way all of apple products communicate with each other is on a whole another level that no other mobile OS can touch.', '>>{Kssio_Aug} : The transition has been quite simple for me too. The things I miss the most from Android, as I said in the OP, is file management and scheduled mobile data. The thing is that iPhone doens\'t allow you to manage files, photos, and other things outside some specific apps. ie.: In Android I could create a folder called "Things" and throw there documents, photos, and any kind of file I wanted; I could also open Google Drive, OneDrive or Dropbox and transfer multiple files to these folders easily. In the other hand, you can\'t do this with iPhone; at least not in a proper simple way; you can make Google and OneDrive files available offline or you can create a folder in iCloud and access them offline in your iPhone, but you will also notice that transfer these cloud files between one another is not as simple (as you can only send one file by one to iCloud) or as intuitive as it is Android. I believe this happens cause in iPhone I\'m under the impression they believe each file belongs to it\'s own app, they don\'t really want you to move them around in the system. For me at least this is the hardest adaption, cause it recquires a new perspective about how to manage files (access, share, import, export) and it\'s limitations. Today, with cloud systems though, you can at least manage them one way or another, creating your clouded folders and acessing your most used or necessary files offline in them; so, besides not exactly the most easy and intuitive way to manage your documents it helps a lot. Other than that though, the system is pretty amazing. Everything is very smooth, there are a lot of features that are well integrated to make your life easier and that are way more than simple gimmicks (you will actually use these features cause they really work), after some exploring things are very intuitive, and Apple gives you some really nice apps right out of the box such as facetime [video calls], imessages [great message app full of nice features], garageband [create your own musics or sounds; it\'s really great], podcasts [sign to your favorite podcasts channel] and imovie [create your own movie with your pictures and videos]. It also seems that the iPhones have great build quality overall, and the iOS is made with their architecture in mind, so that may explain why even with inferior specs they still work so damn well. In resume, if you don\'t mind or can adapt to the file management limitations, which with cloud services are easier to deal with, it is a REALLY great phone and easy to adapt.', '>>{jakeuten} : A9 wipes the floor with the S820/821, and is still a fair bit faster than the Exynos 8890 and Kirin 950.', '>>{accountabilitycounts} : How many churches has BLM burned down? How man lynchings?', ">>{justinx1029} : The file system is my main gripe with iOS. I miss just copy and pasting stuff to my phone. Otherwise I'm extremely happy with my 6s!", '>>{FatLadySingin} : Someone needs to take their tinfoil away..... this is beyond shameless.', '>>{CarmineFields} : This is just going to look worse and worse for Trump.', ">>{CarmineFields} : Like his spokeswoman blaming Khan's death on Obama when he died four years before Obama was elected.", '>>{Taphius} : My brand new S7 is starting to lag already (got on 3/4.). Really hate Qualcomm these past two years. Although my le max 2 is running flawlessly on the same chip (minus an absolutely shitty fp scanner).', '>>{ddttox} : Wait until we see the canceled check from Trump to NAMBLA.', '>>{ConsonantlyDrunk} : [Might want to fact check yourself before you wreck yourself](http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2014/04/14/302871181/suspect-in-killings-at-kansas-city-jewish-sites-linked-to-kkk)', '>>{CarmineFields} : So what? With any of this crap. So what???', '>>{_Underoath_} : Khan literally wrote a paper about the positives of Sharia law', ">>{miashaee} : This isn't working, might want to just tell Donald to shut up about it like with the judge curiel situation.", ">>{CarmineFields} : He has every right to like and support it. That's freedom of religion and freedom of speech.", ">>{_Underoath_} : So you're defending something that treats house cats better than women?", '>>{ConsonantlyDrunk} : Because Democrats\' whole message with this guy was "look at what a squeeky clean lawyer he is" and not "Muslims are Americans too." Way to try and change the subject. You idiots lost the messaging war and ya boy Donnie just wants to lose harder. Now all the Dictator-humping right wing mouthpieces want to assassinate a man\'s character instead of just shutting the fuck up on the subject and letting the news cycle carry it away. It\'s hard to tell who\'s stupider here, Right wing media or Trump.', ">>{CarmineFields} : I'm not defending anything but Khan's constitutional rights. Don't forget Trump has promised to sell out women for Christian fundie votes.", '>>{_Underoath_} : And Hillary promises to sell them out to the Syrians :\\^)', '>>{Snakecharmer2016} : Lol no kidding they keep doubling down on this trainwreck', '>>{IrishJoe} : Keep smearing Gold Star Parents, republicans. You show your true colors to the voters.', ">>{_Underoath_} : I'm not a Republican. Making assumptions doesn't help your case.", ">>{Snakecharmer2016} : Trump will never apologize. He's a sociopath. He also think he's always under attack. He's definitely got some sort of mental disability", '>>{coquio} : Shit smear job there OP. Pedal that garbage but at least dress it up. Oh wait.', '>>{blatherskiter} : Do you support Sharia law and countries that oppress women with Sharia law? Because this Khan fellow was a lobbyist for the Saudi royal family that does.', '>>{dbreeck} : Remember that one time Obama forgot for 5 seconds to salute a marine when he got off Marine Force One?', ">>{Snakecharmer2016} : He wrote a paper on Islamic law. He didn't condone or support it. Are you trying to make trump lose this election? That shoebox guy has no fucking credibility.", ">>{CarmineFields} : How is that stealing anyone's constitutional rights? Trump is planning to fill SCOTUS with fundies to overturn roe v. wade.", ">>{_Underoath_} : Where in the constitution does it give people rights to abortion? Overturning Roe v Wade isn't illegal. Even though I strongly disagree with overturning it.", ">>{_Underoath_} : I'm not attacking him, just pointing out facts.", ">>{CarmineFields} : One of the reasons they want a conservative SCOTUS is to stop overturning the dozens of bills republicans have passed or attempted to pass that would make it optional or illegal to save women dying from pregnancy complications. Since republicans want medical law and triage to continuing protecting men, it's a clear violation of the 14th amendment right to equal protection under the law.", '>>{ME24601} : > Because this Khan fellow was a lobbyist for the Saudi royal family that does. And your evidence of him specifically working as a lobbyist for the Saudi royal family would be...', ">>{Snakecharmer2016} : But they aren't facts. He wrote a paper on Islamic law. You claim he praises it. People are allows to research things they don't agree with. So yes....you were attacking him by spreading a retarded assessment of a completely normal situation.", ">>{SATexas1} : I think they're jumping the shark with the guy, he's so hokey They'll find out that he helped some terrorist", ">>{Whipplashes} : Isn't he a lawyer? I would think that knowing multiple law forms from around the world would be part of his job.", ">>{_Underoath_} : Have you ever been to the Middle East? Thanks to Sharia Law, Muslims can only marry Muslims, women are not allowed to drive or do basically anything without the husband's approval, and homosexuals are sentenced to death in any country that practices Sharia Law.", '>>{ConsonantlyDrunk} : Only in your malaria fueled Right-wing swamp fever dreams.', ">>{SATexas1} : You know it's gonna happen, this guy is gonna help the rethugs, gonna show how blind the Dems are to the threat.", ">>{The_Real_AzorAhai} : Why don't you attempt to explain sharia law to the class, genius?", '>>{Snakecharmer2016} : exactly. Hes a lawyer, he studies law. Hence writing a paper on islamic law. The fact that these trump supporters cant comprehend this is laughable', ">>{Aplodontia} : Link? And not to some deranged propagandist's blog. May I please see a link to the paper, or at the very least, a credible witness?", ">>{Aplodontia} : He's an immigration lawyer. All the idiot right needs to know {Wink, wink}. Remember how well this worked with Obama's birth nation? No actual evidence needed. Remember, the right works on feelings, not facts.", '>>{SATexas1} : Khan says trump has a lake up umpoty Hes pretty judgmental', ">>{_Underoath_} : Then how about you tell me? If what I said isn't actually true. Because that sure is what I saw in Dubai.", ">>{garbagetimes} : Sharia courts operate differently all over the world, because Islam, like all major world faiths, is not identical from region to region. Blindly stating that Sharia law = beheadings, stonings, etc displays nothing but ignorance on your part. But you don't want facts or nuance. You want hate. You want to smear a man because Trump made a fool of himself.", ">>{_Underoath_} : I never stated that Sharia mean't beheadings or stonings. Just that they treat women poorly. I'll retract my statement if you can show me a country that has Sharia Law but gives women the exact same rights as men. I was also only stating things I personally saw when I was in the Middle East."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{Kssio_Aug} : As a long time Android user, I'm loving my 1st iPhone (SE).", ">>{Vjaa} : This is why I love the current mobile market. Sure there are essentially only 2 operating systems, but so many choices. Don't like iPhone, you got a bunch of Android options. Don't like your current Android phone, and you have iPhone and some other Android options.", '>>{rouyal} : Apple is the small phone lovers last hope. Hopefully they keep making them. I got the 6s but may switch to the next SE version if they make one.', '>>{ant1992} : They did. The just upped the storage capacity for them.', ">>{Kssio_Aug} : Sure thing! It's also good to see how Apple takes inspirations from Android phones and Samsung / LG / Motorolla / Google take some inspiration from Apple as well. This helps to bring some of the best features presented by one brand through other phones sooner or later.", ">>{theJamesKPolk} : One nice thing about iOS is that all of Google's apps are on it, and many people think they're even nicer on iOS than on Android. I've switched between an iPhone 7 and Pixel, and I find it easier to use Google's services like Google Photos or Google Keep, just because it's easier to sync across all platforms. Frankly I like Google Photos better than Apple's Photos apps, because you're not locked in. But - one thing you'll find is that first party Apple apps generally play nicer with other first party apps in iOS. So, sometimes it helps to just go with the default Apple app instead of a 3rd-party one. In terms of folder management, it's just something you sort of get used to. If I needed to manage files outside of an app, I'd usually leverage Google Drive or Dropbox as a workaround. Hope this helps!", ">>{Kssio_Aug} : Yep, the only thing holding me back about it was because Google Drive didn't accept offline folders. However, I've just discovered the iCloud Drive. It will be enough to manage some offline files when needed! =)", ">>{realniggaonehunna} : But it's not a spec refresh. Only the storage was increased.", ">>{kadupse} : To be completely fair, at the resolution of the SE model the A9 chip is extremely good. In fact, it's still slightly better than the current Android flagships, so even without the spec bump it's still a very solid purchase. They should've upped the front camera and added 3D Touch though.", ">>{realniggaonehunna} : Yeah agreed. Even though Apple might not refresh the SE this year, they might next year. SE users don't really care about specs that much so we might see apple update the SE every other year.", ">>{felleese} : I'm seriously considering getting an iPhone. I've never used one though. I've had Android drive my very first smartphone. My question would be to those that made the jump to ios from a similar situation to myself, what was it like? Could you get used to it out did you come back? Are there particular things you miss?", ">>{jackdawKPEG14} : I'm thoroughly enjoying my SE as well! Battery life is one of the best I've experienced from any smart phone both android and iOS. I've had mine for a week and the battery life, GUI snappiness, and rear camera blew my expectations away! It's the prefect sized phone for people with medium sized hands HAHAHA", ">>{stereopaper} : I was a longtime android user, had the Galaxy S2 all the way to the S5 and a brand less camera less android phone for work. However, I noticed that my Galaxies always had a tendency to slow down considerably after a years use (even with a lot of memory) so I decided to get the iphone 7 this year. The transition was fairly simple, besides not having a physical back button (you get used to this quite easily) and I think touch gestures are very well engineered and thought out they make the phone easy to use. What I miss? The headphone jack obviously it is rather an inconvenience but the SE is also a good jump if you're prefer smaller screens. As for apps?... I don't think there's anything on Android that Apple can't compare to. I don't think I'll be turning back to Android for a long time. I love my iphone! The camera is also awesome.", '>>{iBZRK} : Welcome to the iPhone club. Now once you start getting other apple products you will fall deeper in love. The way all of apple products communicate with each other is on a whole another level that no other mobile OS can touch.', '>>{Kssio_Aug} : The transition has been quite simple for me too. The things I miss the most from Android, as I said in the OP, is file management and scheduled mobile data. The thing is that iPhone doens\'t allow you to manage files, photos, and other things outside some specific apps. ie.: In Android I could create a folder called "Things" and throw there documents, photos, and any kind of file I wanted; I could also open Google Drive, OneDrive or Dropbox and transfer multiple files to these folders easily. In the other hand, you can\'t do this with iPhone; at least not in a proper simple way; you can make Google and OneDrive files available offline or you can create a folder in iCloud and access them offline in your iPhone, but you will also notice that transfer these cloud files between one another is not as simple (as you can only send one file by one to iCloud) or as intuitive as it is Android. I believe this happens cause in iPhone I\'m under the impression they believe each file belongs to it\'s own app, they don\'t really want you to move them around in the system. For me at least this is the hardest adaption, cause it recquires a new perspective about how to manage files (access, share, import, export) and it\'s limitations. Today, with cloud systems though, you can at least manage them one way or another, creating your clouded folders and acessing your most used or necessary files offline in them; so, besides not exactly the most easy and intuitive way to manage your documents it helps a lot. Other than that though, the system is pretty amazing. Everything is very smooth, there are a lot of features that are well integrated to make your life easier and that are way more than simple gimmicks (you will actually use these features cause they really work), after some exploring things are very intuitive, and Apple gives you some really nice apps right out of the box such as facetime [video calls], imessages [great message app full of nice features], garageband [create your own musics or sounds; it\'s really great], podcasts [sign to your favorite podcasts channel] and imovie [create your own movie with your pictures and videos]. It also seems that the iPhones have great build quality overall, and the iOS is made with their architecture in mind, so that may explain why even with inferior specs they still work so damn well. In resume, if you don\'t mind or can adapt to the file management limitations, which with cloud services are easier to deal with, it is a REALLY great phone and easy to adapt.', '>>{jakeuten} : A9 wipes the floor with the S820/821, and is still a fair bit faster than the Exynos 8890 and Kirin 950.', ">>{justinx1029} : The file system is my main gripe with iOS. I miss just copy and pasting stuff to my phone. Otherwise I'm extremely happy with my 6s!", '>>{Taphius} : My brand new S7 is starting to lag already (got on 3/4.). Really hate Qualcomm these past two years. Although my le max 2 is running flawlessly on the same chip (minus an absolutely shitty fp scanner).'], ['>>{imissbarack} : What the hell is this garbage ^e: ^pls ^submit ^to ^/r/Big_Cheeto', ">>{Bhantl01} : Check out OP's post history. He/she posted a video about BLM being worse than the KKK.", ">>{JennysDad} : It's the right wing not knowing when they should just shut up and move on. They lost this battle and now the are trying to lose even harder.", ">>{quadropheniac} : There's no idea stupid enough to not find a constituency on the internet.", '>>{ME24601} : Sure Trump supporters. Just keep attacking the Khans with completely nonsensical lies. That will *definitely* help your candidate.', ">>{Dads_cream_soda} : Shoebat tells a rumor now most right wing publications are reporting it as fact. Let's hope it reaches to Trump so he can make a bigger fool out of himself again.", ">>{SATexas1} : The thing is, this guys client list is gonna come out and it's gonna have some bad characters on it - when that happens it's going to draw a stark contrast with the democrats who haven't seen the threat and pranced him onstage. The risk reward on this benefits the republicans, double down on it, and it's going to show that the Dems don't understand the threat.", ">>{Bhantl01} : Oh and can you enumerate how BLM is worse than the KKK? FYI: You can't unless you ignore the 100+ year history of the KKK. Edit: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA u/BlueAvians deleted their historically inaccurate and racist posts. What a coward.", '>>{RandomCanucklehead} : Please keep shitting on this family. – HRC', '>>{thisishorsepoop} : Might want to get off reddit and open a history book.', ">>{travio} : Smearing the dad will not win this. The only way to end this is with an apology. Then the story could die and we could wait for Donald's newest gaffe.", '>>{CarmineFields} : They still freak out like Pence did over the word demagogue.', '>>{accountabilitycounts} : How many churches has BLM burned down? How man lynchings?', '>>{FatLadySingin} : Someone needs to take their tinfoil away..... this is beyond shameless.', '>>{CarmineFields} : This is just going to look worse and worse for Trump.', ">>{CarmineFields} : Like his spokeswoman blaming Khan's death on Obama when he died four years before Obama was elected.", '>>{ddttox} : Wait until we see the canceled check from Trump to NAMBLA.', '>>{ConsonantlyDrunk} : [Might want to fact check yourself before you wreck yourself](http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2014/04/14/302871181/suspect-in-killings-at-kansas-city-jewish-sites-linked-to-kkk)', '>>{CarmineFields} : So what? With any of this crap. So what???', '>>{_Underoath_} : Khan literally wrote a paper about the positives of Sharia law', ">>{miashaee} : This isn't working, might want to just tell Donald to shut up about it like with the judge curiel situation.", ">>{CarmineFields} : He has every right to like and support it. That's freedom of religion and freedom of speech.", ">>{_Underoath_} : So you're defending something that treats house cats better than women?", '>>{ConsonantlyDrunk} : Because Democrats\' whole message with this guy was "look at what a squeeky clean lawyer he is" and not "Muslims are Americans too." Way to try and change the subject. You idiots lost the messaging war and ya boy Donnie just wants to lose harder. Now all the Dictator-humping right wing mouthpieces want to assassinate a man\'s character instead of just shutting the fuck up on the subject and letting the news cycle carry it away. It\'s hard to tell who\'s stupider here, Right wing media or Trump.', ">>{CarmineFields} : I'm not defending anything but Khan's constitutional rights. Don't forget Trump has promised to sell out women for Christian fundie votes.", '>>{_Underoath_} : And Hillary promises to sell them out to the Syrians :\\^)', '>>{Snakecharmer2016} : Lol no kidding they keep doubling down on this trainwreck', '>>{IrishJoe} : Keep smearing Gold Star Parents, republicans. You show your true colors to the voters.', ">>{_Underoath_} : I'm not a Republican. Making assumptions doesn't help your case.", ">>{Snakecharmer2016} : Trump will never apologize. He's a sociopath. He also think he's always under attack. He's definitely got some sort of mental disability", '>>{coquio} : Shit smear job there OP. Pedal that garbage but at least dress it up. Oh wait.', '>>{blatherskiter} : Do you support Sharia law and countries that oppress women with Sharia law? Because this Khan fellow was a lobbyist for the Saudi royal family that does.', '>>{dbreeck} : Remember that one time Obama forgot for 5 seconds to salute a marine when he got off Marine Force One?', ">>{Snakecharmer2016} : He wrote a paper on Islamic law. He didn't condone or support it. Are you trying to make trump lose this election? That shoebox guy has no fucking credibility.", ">>{CarmineFields} : How is that stealing anyone's constitutional rights? Trump is planning to fill SCOTUS with fundies to overturn roe v. wade.", ">>{_Underoath_} : Where in the constitution does it give people rights to abortion? Overturning Roe v Wade isn't illegal. Even though I strongly disagree with overturning it.", ">>{_Underoath_} : I'm not attacking him, just pointing out facts.", ">>{CarmineFields} : One of the reasons they want a conservative SCOTUS is to stop overturning the dozens of bills republicans have passed or attempted to pass that would make it optional or illegal to save women dying from pregnancy complications. Since republicans want medical law and triage to continuing protecting men, it's a clear violation of the 14th amendment right to equal protection under the law.", '>>{ME24601} : > Because this Khan fellow was a lobbyist for the Saudi royal family that does. And your evidence of him specifically working as a lobbyist for the Saudi royal family would be...', ">>{Snakecharmer2016} : But they aren't facts. He wrote a paper on Islamic law. You claim he praises it. People are allows to research things they don't agree with. So yes....you were attacking him by spreading a retarded assessment of a completely normal situation.", ">>{SATexas1} : I think they're jumping the shark with the guy, he's so hokey They'll find out that he helped some terrorist", ">>{Whipplashes} : Isn't he a lawyer? I would think that knowing multiple law forms from around the world would be part of his job.", ">>{_Underoath_} : Have you ever been to the Middle East? Thanks to Sharia Law, Muslims can only marry Muslims, women are not allowed to drive or do basically anything without the husband's approval, and homosexuals are sentenced to death in any country that practices Sharia Law.", '>>{ConsonantlyDrunk} : Only in your malaria fueled Right-wing swamp fever dreams.', ">>{SATexas1} : You know it's gonna happen, this guy is gonna help the rethugs, gonna show how blind the Dems are to the threat.", ">>{The_Real_AzorAhai} : Why don't you attempt to explain sharia law to the class, genius?", '>>{Snakecharmer2016} : exactly. Hes a lawyer, he studies law. Hence writing a paper on islamic law. The fact that these trump supporters cant comprehend this is laughable', ">>{Aplodontia} : Link? And not to some deranged propagandist's blog. May I please see a link to the paper, or at the very least, a credible witness?", ">>{Aplodontia} : He's an immigration lawyer. All the idiot right needs to know {Wink, wink}. Remember how well this worked with Obama's birth nation? No actual evidence needed. Remember, the right works on feelings, not facts.", '>>{SATexas1} : Khan says trump has a lake up umpoty Hes pretty judgmental', ">>{_Underoath_} : Then how about you tell me? If what I said isn't actually true. Because that sure is what I saw in Dubai.", ">>{garbagetimes} : Sharia courts operate differently all over the world, because Islam, like all major world faiths, is not identical from region to region. Blindly stating that Sharia law = beheadings, stonings, etc displays nothing but ignorance on your part. But you don't want facts or nuance. You want hate. You want to smear a man because Trump made a fool of himself.", ">>{_Underoath_} : I never stated that Sharia mean't beheadings or stonings. Just that they treat women poorly. I'll retract my statement if you can show me a country that has Sharia Law but gives women the exact same rights as men. I was also only stating things I personally saw when I was in the Middle East."]]

classify and reply

['>>{kaskas100} : These Are The Sacrifices Donald Trump Has Made, According To Twitter', '>>{California254} : Why would anyone buy an MP3 player in 2016?', '>>{zedanger} : So do something about them? Or are you just gonna bitch and moan about how unfair everything is, like your hero?', '>>{farcetragedy} : More Companies Opt to Sit Out Trump’s Coronation in Cleveland', ">>{farcetragedy} : > Among those to signal in recent days that they won't sponsor the convention this year are Wells Fargo & Co., United Parcel Service Inc., Motorola Solutions Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Ford Motor Co., and Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. All of those companies sponsored the previous Republican conclave, in Tampa, Florida, in 2012.", '>>{sjwsruinedreddit} : What sacrifices has Hillary made? Taking sniper fire?', ">>{Commonsenseonly} : Well all these companies are Pro-TPP and/or conflict with Trump's policies. Not really surprising.", ">>{biznash} : I actually just got back from an outdoor run with my nano. The thing is great for runners, and meets all my demands: 1. It's light 2. Long battery 3. No screen to break 4. Tactile buttons, (I know where to press to do what, on a run I don't have to unclip it, I do it by feel) Hassles: 1. to upload a new podcast for a run I need to start up iTunes and physically sync it to my nano. 2. If you ever lose the tiny sync / charge cord you are ffffhhhhhuuuucked. Don't lose it. I've had the same player for 6-7 years now and run regularly. Tech just works great for my use. How many things can we say that about? Love it!", '>>{GuitarsAndCameras} : Corporate America knows a snake oil salesman when they see one.', '>>{pissbum-emeritus} : >These Are The Sacrifices Donald Trump Has Made, According To Random Fortune Cookies', '>>{bhanu8999} : No Distraction, simple to use, less weight.', ">>{DronedAgain} : To save the battery on my phone, and use it for phone stuff while listening to music on my mp3 player. Since they're so cheap, I have a few, and one has all chill / ambient on it, another my greatest hits kinds of tunes, and another the weirder songs I like when no one's around to be judgy.", ">>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : She isn't the one who said that she sacrifices. This is a response to a statement that Trump made, not a statement that both of them made.", ">>{unholyswordsman} : I still have a 16 Gigabyte Sony Walkman because I don't like wasting my phone battery and it's much smaller and lighter. I also use it a lot in my car.", ">>{sjwsruinedreddit} : I don't give a fuck about his statement, I am asking you or anyone else what sacrifices has Hillary made?", ">>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : I don't know. Maybe she didn't make any sacrifices. But she didn't claim to either.", '>>{UWantWhatUGet} : > "If any of their employees walked inside their jobs and said the things Donald Trump is saying on the campaign trail, in front of countless cameras and journalists, they would be fired,” said Rashad Robinson of ColorOfChange PAC, That is your future with clinton, people. Did you say something??? You\'re fired. Enjoy having Correct The Record eavesdropping on everything you say, do, or think.', ">>{CarmineFields} : No one has to make sacrifices but don't pretend you did when you haven't ever sacrificed anything for anyone.", ">>{spockspeare} : All good reasons. I used to use a tiny SanDisk Sansa player. Just drag files onto it, or even use the FM receiver built in, when I rode my bike. Then one day I got caught out with a puncture and a defective spare. Stuck and going nowhere and miles from home. Had to lug my bike to a fire station a ways up the road, on bike shoes (nb: firemen have really nice day-rooms and play a lot of video games when they're not saving lives). So there I realized I really should always carry my phone, not just a music device. Bonus: it has all of my music on it, not just what I remember to load. And an FM radio app. No loss of functionality. Somewhat more bulk but manageable. Although a phone the size of a [Sansa](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/lFpPDvfpy4k/maxresdefault.jpg) would be pretty awesome for those situations.", '>>{Disadvorange} : She never went on Twitter to belittle the father of slain soldier saying that she had also made sacrifices in comparison. You can obfuscate all you want, but the only thing Trump has sacrificed recently is his dignity and his soul.', '>>{ScaryBlackDude} : That is your future with anyone. What do you want to do? Make it so companies cannot fire their employees for public statements that embarrass the company?', '>>{axelrod_squad} : Yeah! Corporate America are the cool guys now! Dem party is so kick-ass.', ">>{sjwsruinedreddit} : Because using a slain soldier's family for political gain, plenty of dignity there.", '>>{916hotdogs} : Trump is literally getting corporations out of politics. Under budget, ahead of schedule!', ">>{sjwsruinedreddit} : There's a funny meme going around, same writer for MSNBC slamming RNC for using Benghazi mom, and his article next to it praising DNC for using Khan.", ">>{916hotdogs} : It actually is though. They thought they could wrangle him, but they couldn't. And now the corporations and GOP are trying to revolt. The big political string pullers donate to both sides anyway, so they're much happier jumping ship to Hillary.", ">>{GuitarsAndCameras} : Yeah! That's *just* what I said! lol", '>>{Maziva} : I still have my creative zen stone 2GB! Best MP3 player for exercising and running ever....small lightweight and an external speaker :) it will be a very very VERY SAD DAY WHEN IT EVENTUALLY DIES', ">>{blatherskiter} : Trump sacrificed $25,000 to help a Marine that was left to rot in a Mexican jail for two years by Hillary Clinton. Trump sacrificed his time and money to help the city of New York build an ice rink. Trump sacrificed two marriages to keep his business afloat and keep 30,000 people employed. Trump attempted to sacrifice his own profit by opposing NAFTA for the sake of American workers. Trump sacrificed his income and personal safety to run for president (you're MUCH more likely to be killed as President than you are as a soldier in Iraq or Afghanistan).", '>>{Mr_Montague} : Good. Why the F would he want corporate America to be there anyway?', '>>{Qwikphaze} : Speaking of dignity, you catch those nekkid pics of our potential First Lady? I hear a sex tape is coming next.', '>>{lolator123} : Please spin more. Trump defended himself. Khan family chose to swing at Trump and he swung back. Maybe the parents should spit on their sons grave by using him as a political tool. Not to mention that Muslims killed their son. The exact people Trump is against', ">>{sjwsruinedreddit} : Leave it to a liberal (self proclaimed fighter for women's rights and all that) to slam and denigrate a woman. That's going to make you guys look reeeeeal good with women.", '>>{UWantWhatUGet} : This is a reasonable response, thanks. My intent was that the CTR focus would be through the government (or the government dictating to your company) dictating what "is embarrassing" to the company.', ">>{row_guy} : They don't want to be associated with a racist bigot. Sorry to break it to you.", '>>{Qwikphaze} : Rumor has it, she gets slammed and denigrated on.', ">>{CMYK2RGB} : Sadly my Zune's battery is not lasting as long as it used too; It was a device before smart phones not large that carried the majority of my music collection, meaning I had at least 75% of my music amd live concert recordings with me in the size of an iphone. I have less music now and it is less to scroll through, but being able to bust out random hardly heard concerts or lost tapes at a party is very sweet.", '>>{drordinaire} : >Trump sacrificed $25,000 to help a Marine that was left to rot in a Mexican jail for two years by Hillary Clinton. Commendable. Hillary and Bill Clinton gave $3 million to charity despite being worth a fraction of Trump\'s net worth (allegedly). Meanwhile the Clinton foundation [raised almost 2 billion in charity.](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clintons-raised-nearly-2-billion-for-foundation-since-2001/2015/02/18/b8425d88-a7cd-11e4-a7c2-03d37af98440_story.html) >Trump sacrificed his time and money to help the city of New York build an ice rink. ["In the final deal, the city paid for the renovation, and the profits were all donated to charity."](http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/features/2015-09-29/a-1980s-new-york-city-battle-explains-donald-trump-s-candidacy) >Trump sacrificed two marriages to keep his business afloat and keep 30,000 people employed. I\'m sure that has nothing to do with the fact the he cheated on his wives and everything to do with him loving his employees. I\'d love to link details but the same ex-wives are legally prohibited from saying anything. I\'d like to hear his wives say something. Maybe they aren\'t allowed to. >Trump attempted to sacrifice his own profit by opposing NAFTA for the sake of American workers. [Which is why he\'s currently importing foreign workers for his resort.](http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/28/trump-just-filed-applications-for-foreign-workers-at-resort/) >Trump sacrificed his income and personal safety to run for president (you\'re MUCH more likely to be killed as President than you are as a soldier in Iraq or Afghanistan). I\'m not even going to bother linking anything here. Only 4 sitting Presidents have ever been assassinated and, only a handful of attempts on presidential candidates. They also get hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of security from the Secret Service. You can look up the numbers of servicemen killed in the line of duty yourself.', '>>{cups8101} : [I present to you said phone](http://www.gizchina.com/2014/06/03/chinese-clone-makers-produces-palm-sized-iphone-5s-mini/) I actually got this phone a while back off of ebay but unfortunately it stooped working for some reason.', '>>{CzechoslovakianJesus} : I know people that use them to help save the precious battery life of their phones.', '>>{Gold_Jacobson} : Tell Trump to shut up for a few days and there will be less ammo.', '>>{cha5m} : What a stupid article premise. Obviously because it is cheap, and is smaller and lighter than a smartphone, which is good for exercising.', '>>{Ennion} : I love my clip on nano. Leave the phone in the locker. No Internet connection needed.', ">>{aaronler} : Dumb article.... this dufus wants a sim card in an mp3 player I'm assuming with all his whining about no streaming service on the devices. Either that or wifi capabilities? I'll just plan my run to stay in my router radius. Android wear 2.0 will probably take care of all of this.", '>>{Gscarveguy} : Sacrificed all pubic hair when it was transplanted to head!', ">>{WhatInYourPants} : That's both the smallest and fattest iPhone I've ever seen.", '>>{WhatInYourPants} : Why not just stash some power banks around the place instead, to charge your phone. MP3 players need to be charged anyway.', ">>{Sylanthra} : How about for sound quality? Seems strange that this wasn't even mentioned. A phone dac and amp are pretty bad and the hardware in any of the cheap mp3 players are hardly any better. You would have to spend $500+ for something good.", '>>{cups8101} : Its a real phone! it works and can place calls and can run android apps. It really turned heads for a while until it broke.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{kaskas100} : These Are The Sacrifices Donald Trump Has Made, According To Twitter', '>>{zedanger} : So do something about them? Or are you just gonna bitch and moan about how unfair everything is, like your hero?', '>>{sjwsruinedreddit} : What sacrifices has Hillary made? Taking sniper fire?', '>>{pissbum-emeritus} : >These Are The Sacrifices Donald Trump Has Made, According To Random Fortune Cookies', ">>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : She isn't the one who said that she sacrifices. This is a response to a statement that Trump made, not a statement that both of them made.", ">>{sjwsruinedreddit} : I don't give a fuck about his statement, I am asking you or anyone else what sacrifices has Hillary made?", ">>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : I don't know. Maybe she didn't make any sacrifices. But she didn't claim to either.", ">>{CarmineFields} : No one has to make sacrifices but don't pretend you did when you haven't ever sacrificed anything for anyone.", '>>{Disadvorange} : She never went on Twitter to belittle the father of slain soldier saying that she had also made sacrifices in comparison. You can obfuscate all you want, but the only thing Trump has sacrificed recently is his dignity and his soul.', ">>{sjwsruinedreddit} : Because using a slain soldier's family for political gain, plenty of dignity there.", ">>{sjwsruinedreddit} : There's a funny meme going around, same writer for MSNBC slamming RNC for using Benghazi mom, and his article next to it praising DNC for using Khan.", ">>{blatherskiter} : Trump sacrificed $25,000 to help a Marine that was left to rot in a Mexican jail for two years by Hillary Clinton. Trump sacrificed his time and money to help the city of New York build an ice rink. Trump sacrificed two marriages to keep his business afloat and keep 30,000 people employed. Trump attempted to sacrifice his own profit by opposing NAFTA for the sake of American workers. Trump sacrificed his income and personal safety to run for president (you're MUCH more likely to be killed as President than you are as a soldier in Iraq or Afghanistan).", '>>{Qwikphaze} : Speaking of dignity, you catch those nekkid pics of our potential First Lady? I hear a sex tape is coming next.', '>>{lolator123} : Please spin more. Trump defended himself. Khan family chose to swing at Trump and he swung back. Maybe the parents should spit on their sons grave by using him as a political tool. Not to mention that Muslims killed their son. The exact people Trump is against', ">>{sjwsruinedreddit} : Leave it to a liberal (self proclaimed fighter for women's rights and all that) to slam and denigrate a woman. That's going to make you guys look reeeeeal good with women.", '>>{Qwikphaze} : Rumor has it, she gets slammed and denigrated on.', '>>{drordinaire} : >Trump sacrificed $25,000 to help a Marine that was left to rot in a Mexican jail for two years by Hillary Clinton. Commendable. Hillary and Bill Clinton gave $3 million to charity despite being worth a fraction of Trump\'s net worth (allegedly). Meanwhile the Clinton foundation [raised almost 2 billion in charity.](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clintons-raised-nearly-2-billion-for-foundation-since-2001/2015/02/18/b8425d88-a7cd-11e4-a7c2-03d37af98440_story.html) >Trump sacrificed his time and money to help the city of New York build an ice rink. ["In the final deal, the city paid for the renovation, and the profits were all donated to charity."](http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/features/2015-09-29/a-1980s-new-york-city-battle-explains-donald-trump-s-candidacy) >Trump sacrificed two marriages to keep his business afloat and keep 30,000 people employed. I\'m sure that has nothing to do with the fact the he cheated on his wives and everything to do with him loving his employees. I\'d love to link details but the same ex-wives are legally prohibited from saying anything. I\'d like to hear his wives say something. Maybe they aren\'t allowed to. >Trump attempted to sacrifice his own profit by opposing NAFTA for the sake of American workers. [Which is why he\'s currently importing foreign workers for his resort.](http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/28/trump-just-filed-applications-for-foreign-workers-at-resort/) >Trump sacrificed his income and personal safety to run for president (you\'re MUCH more likely to be killed as President than you are as a soldier in Iraq or Afghanistan). I\'m not even going to bother linking anything here. Only 4 sitting Presidents have ever been assassinated and, only a handful of attempts on presidential candidates. They also get hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of security from the Secret Service. You can look up the numbers of servicemen killed in the line of duty yourself.', '>>{Gold_Jacobson} : Tell Trump to shut up for a few days and there will be less ammo.', '>>{Gscarveguy} : Sacrificed all pubic hair when it was transplanted to head!'], ['>>{California254} : Why would anyone buy an MP3 player in 2016?', ">>{biznash} : I actually just got back from an outdoor run with my nano. The thing is great for runners, and meets all my demands: 1. It's light 2. Long battery 3. No screen to break 4. Tactile buttons, (I know where to press to do what, on a run I don't have to unclip it, I do it by feel) Hassles: 1. to upload a new podcast for a run I need to start up iTunes and physically sync it to my nano. 2. If you ever lose the tiny sync / charge cord you are ffffhhhhhuuuucked. Don't lose it. I've had the same player for 6-7 years now and run regularly. Tech just works great for my use. How many things can we say that about? Love it!", '>>{bhanu8999} : No Distraction, simple to use, less weight.', ">>{DronedAgain} : To save the battery on my phone, and use it for phone stuff while listening to music on my mp3 player. Since they're so cheap, I have a few, and one has all chill / ambient on it, another my greatest hits kinds of tunes, and another the weirder songs I like when no one's around to be judgy.", ">>{unholyswordsman} : I still have a 16 Gigabyte Sony Walkman because I don't like wasting my phone battery and it's much smaller and lighter. I also use it a lot in my car.", ">>{spockspeare} : All good reasons. I used to use a tiny SanDisk Sansa player. Just drag files onto it, or even use the FM receiver built in, when I rode my bike. Then one day I got caught out with a puncture and a defective spare. Stuck and going nowhere and miles from home. Had to lug my bike to a fire station a ways up the road, on bike shoes (nb: firemen have really nice day-rooms and play a lot of video games when they're not saving lives). So there I realized I really should always carry my phone, not just a music device. Bonus: it has all of my music on it, not just what I remember to load. And an FM radio app. No loss of functionality. Somewhat more bulk but manageable. Although a phone the size of a [Sansa](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/lFpPDvfpy4k/maxresdefault.jpg) would be pretty awesome for those situations.", '>>{Maziva} : I still have my creative zen stone 2GB! Best MP3 player for exercising and running ever....small lightweight and an external speaker :) it will be a very very VERY SAD DAY WHEN IT EVENTUALLY DIES', ">>{CMYK2RGB} : Sadly my Zune's battery is not lasting as long as it used too; It was a device before smart phones not large that carried the majority of my music collection, meaning I had at least 75% of my music amd live concert recordings with me in the size of an iphone. I have less music now and it is less to scroll through, but being able to bust out random hardly heard concerts or lost tapes at a party is very sweet.", '>>{cups8101} : [I present to you said phone](http://www.gizchina.com/2014/06/03/chinese-clone-makers-produces-palm-sized-iphone-5s-mini/) I actually got this phone a while back off of ebay but unfortunately it stooped working for some reason.', '>>{CzechoslovakianJesus} : I know people that use them to help save the precious battery life of their phones.', '>>{cha5m} : What a stupid article premise. Obviously because it is cheap, and is smaller and lighter than a smartphone, which is good for exercising.', '>>{Ennion} : I love my clip on nano. Leave the phone in the locker. No Internet connection needed.', ">>{aaronler} : Dumb article.... this dufus wants a sim card in an mp3 player I'm assuming with all his whining about no streaming service on the devices. Either that or wifi capabilities? I'll just plan my run to stay in my router radius. Android wear 2.0 will probably take care of all of this.", ">>{WhatInYourPants} : That's both the smallest and fattest iPhone I've ever seen.", '>>{WhatInYourPants} : Why not just stash some power banks around the place instead, to charge your phone. MP3 players need to be charged anyway.', ">>{Sylanthra} : How about for sound quality? Seems strange that this wasn't even mentioned. A phone dac and amp are pretty bad and the hardware in any of the cheap mp3 players are hardly any better. You would have to spend $500+ for something good.", '>>{cups8101} : Its a real phone! it works and can place calls and can run android apps. It really turned heads for a while until it broke.'], ['>>{farcetragedy} : More Companies Opt to Sit Out Trump’s Coronation in Cleveland', ">>{farcetragedy} : > Among those to signal in recent days that they won't sponsor the convention this year are Wells Fargo & Co., United Parcel Service Inc., Motorola Solutions Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Ford Motor Co., and Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. All of those companies sponsored the previous Republican conclave, in Tampa, Florida, in 2012.", ">>{Commonsenseonly} : Well all these companies are Pro-TPP and/or conflict with Trump's policies. Not really surprising.", '>>{GuitarsAndCameras} : Corporate America knows a snake oil salesman when they see one.', '>>{UWantWhatUGet} : > "If any of their employees walked inside their jobs and said the things Donald Trump is saying on the campaign trail, in front of countless cameras and journalists, they would be fired,” said Rashad Robinson of ColorOfChange PAC, That is your future with clinton, people. Did you say something??? You\'re fired. Enjoy having Correct The Record eavesdropping on everything you say, do, or think.', '>>{ScaryBlackDude} : That is your future with anyone. What do you want to do? Make it so companies cannot fire their employees for public statements that embarrass the company?', '>>{axelrod_squad} : Yeah! Corporate America are the cool guys now! Dem party is so kick-ass.', '>>{916hotdogs} : Trump is literally getting corporations out of politics. Under budget, ahead of schedule!', ">>{916hotdogs} : It actually is though. They thought they could wrangle him, but they couldn't. And now the corporations and GOP are trying to revolt. The big political string pullers donate to both sides anyway, so they're much happier jumping ship to Hillary.", ">>{GuitarsAndCameras} : Yeah! That's *just* what I said! lol", '>>{Mr_Montague} : Good. Why the F would he want corporate America to be there anyway?', '>>{UWantWhatUGet} : This is a reasonable response, thanks. My intent was that the CTR focus would be through the government (or the government dictating to your company) dictating what "is embarrassing" to the company.', ">>{row_guy} : They don't want to be associated with a racist bigot. Sorry to break it to you."]]

classify and reply

[">>{god_im_bored} : Donald Trump's 'Muslim ban' costs US travel industry an estimated $185m as tourism interest 'falls off a cliff'", '>>{HamsterSandwich} : Can Fox News survive the forces it unleashed on the 2016 election?', '>>{stragen595} : It will be more if they are driving further down this street.', ">>{altuniverseyou} : If I was planning a trip and one country was arguing over laws about who can come and who can't I'd definitely decide to go somewhere else, whether I was affected by it or not.", ">>{PixelWhaticus} : The government will be fine. All of the people whose jobs revolve around tourism will not. And whether Kayak is legit or not, speaking as a Canadian, I don't plan on entering the US while Trump is in power, and I have plenty of friends and family who feel exactly the same.", ">>{yourethepuppet} : If Trump starts his own network that's more along the lines of what Brietbart puts out, you'll see a lot of Fox's viewers start to watch Trump's network. Fox will probably survive, but will no longer be the most watched cable news channel.", '>>{Alexa_play_music} : As if there are that many people from those seven countries that travel here.', ">>{GetTheLedPaintOut} : I know the GOP will survive, but this is a very interesting question. It's like watching the french revolution writ small. Trump News Network is about to declare war on Austria and you had better get on board Fox News or else...", ">>{di11deux} : Fox News finds itself in an uncomfortable position. Despite being the partisan agitator that helped birth the amniotic abomination we call the candidacy of Donald Trump, they are going to be a victim of two forces, one within their control, and the other outside. Fox has been insistent on reminding its viewers of the nefarious Obama Administration's ways, and has been conditioning its viewers to not only distrust other news sources, but to reject them entirely. As the Republic moves towards a more liberal, tolerant nation, Fox & Friends have sunk their teeth into their demographic and are holding on tight, even if it means artificially widening the partisan gap. The result, of course, is a dedicated and loyal demographic that doesn't look to get its news from anywhere else. But this loyal grouping is old, and its not growing. [Their viewership is the oldest in the buisness](http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/whos-got-the-oldest-cable-news-audience/280396), and Millennials are not exactly flocking to Fox either. For those younger viewers with similar political leanings, they tend to congregate around internet agitators like Drudge and Breitbart. So Fox has placed its bets on a demographic with an average life expectancy of 10 more years and has not been able to court a younger viewership. In the 2020's, Fox will likely shrink unless there is a serious re-branding effort.", '>>{Maxwell69} : The estimated loss of $185 million comes from the Global Business Travel Association, not from Kayak.', ">>{Maxwell69} : To the US government that isn't so bad, but a lot of that money would have gone into local communities which will have a harder time making up for the loss of revenue.", '>>{adickshapedtongue} : As if only people from the target countries are the only ones being put-off.', '>>{Itsprobablysarcasm} : When you step back and look at what has played out, it is easy to see that the stage was set to eviscerate Fox News by Donald. Donald is gonna syphon off all the deplorables when he launches a Breitbart-backed TV channel of alt-right filth. They\'re not even gonna try to be "fair and balanced". They gonna go full Alex Jones. Roger Ailes was quickly picked up and likely played for his expertise, but now that they\'ve sucked the marrow from that carcass, he\'s been chucked. Fox News has a chance to, dare I say it, because a decent network for the non-deplorables sitting centre-right. And there is a lot of them. They\'re not loud and vocal like the pants-on-head idjits that was were the tea party and are now proud MAGAs, but they are still a force to be reckoned with. Fox News could be the "pragmatic middle"; but they gotta tone down the blatant partisanship and move away from being a "party" network to a "belief-set" network of holding ALL government accountable, regardless of party. Or, implode. Their choice.', '>>{ILoveGaryJohnson} : It\'s not an "if". For a narcissist like Trump, this election has probably been the best experience of his life, even if he loses. For over a year, all the media has been paying attention to him every time he farts and he looovess the attention. He won\'t be able to give it up. He will start TrumpTV and I\'m expecting it to actually be pretty huge. He already has a cult following.', ">>{texdeveloper} : Read this today, I found it relevant and quoted the main points below http://www.redstate.com/joesquire/2016/10/20/poll-republicans-falling-love-fox-news/ >YouGov's BrandIndex has shown Republicans put Fox News in their top 20 favorite brands for years. In 2014, it was No. 10, but last year it dipped to No. 15 on the list. This year? It's plummeted down to 50. However, before you think it's all going to CNN or MSNBC, they fell from the 1300s to the 1400s. >What is causing the Fox brand to fall? A mixture of things, I'd imagine. > 1) Ailes scandal. > 2) News personalities leaving the network. > 3) People who think they boost Trump too much. > 4) People who think they are totally against Trump. > I mean, 3 and 4 alone are probably a big chunk of their audience anyway. It's not that they're losing viewers so much as people just don't respect them. It also seems to be media-wide, but the substantial fall of Fox News is important. Elections have consequences, and this appears to be one of them. Fox has not covered itself in glory at all this year.", '>>{USAOne} : [That look you get when a Trump supporter attempts to rationalize voting for a Racist, Bigot, Woman hater](https://i.redd.it/xemt58ggaksx.jpg)', '>>{JMFR} : If Trump doesn\'t start a network, they\'ll slink back. Where else are they going to go? If he does start one, then Fox will probably re-brand itself as a "Classically Republican" network to try and hold onto the establishment people that aren\'t welcome in Trumpland.', ">>{dagwood222} : It's been a month and cracks are starting to show. It isn't the tourists from those seven nations, it's tourists from EU, China and Asia who look at the news and say, 'let's try Brazil or a safari instead of seeing NYC or Hollywood.' There are a lot of tourists out there who can choose to come to the US or not. A drop of 5-10% will be noticed.", '>>{thureb} : I think murdochs sons are trying to do just that. Supposedly they were behind ailes firing and are trying to push a much less conspiratorial approach. I guess we will see how it shakes out in the next 6 months.', ">>{dayrise} : We'll only see more of this as the isolationist policies get pushed through and Trump keeps finding ways to ratchet up tension with our allies. I question if we're even a safe place for our current legal immigrants, given the raids.", ">>{Perge192} : >“The US has historically been one of the most popular countries for **Brits, but searches to popular destinations falling by over half in one year is a massive shift.** With hotel prices also falling significantly, it may only be a matter of time before airlines follow suit. It will be interesting to see if it can bounce back in 2018,” she added. >Searches for flights to *Tampa and Orlando declined 58 per cent* while searches for *Miami were down 52 per cent* when compared to last year. Searches for *San Diego dropped by 43 per cent, Las Vegas by 36 per cent and Los Angeles 32 by per cent.* >Flight app\xa0Hopper\xa0analysed flight search demand from 122 international origins to the US for weeks immediately before and after Mr Trump's inauguration and in **February found that demand fell significantly after the travel ban was announced** So we have an administration actively hurting a thriving market. Way to go guys. Not only is he not bringing back your precious coal jobs, he's hurting other industries. Especially considering how much tourism helps with lower wage/lower skill work. And there will be idiots who will still support this ban, even though it was short sighted and is hurting Americans. I'm sure there are some wonderful social programs in place to help them transition to new jobs though! /s", ">>{Negative_Clank} : Considering the violence against any brown person, I wouldn't want to make it my first choice for a vacation", ">>{PixelWhaticus} : I doubt Trump is giving even the slightest thought to tourism. I've never once heard him say a blessed thing about tourists. All of his rhetoric points to protectionism and isolating the US from the rest of the world. Why would anyone who isn't white want to risk going stateside and run into trouble with people telling them to get out of their country? Even if media reports of hate crimes are overblown, which is a distinct possibility, I don't see many tourists wanting to take the risk. Hell, I'm as white as they come and I STILL don't want to go to the States, [if only because there's not a chance in hell I'm handing over my phone / laptop and all my passwords just to visit](https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/02/give-us-your-passwords/516315/), I dunno, Buffalo. [As for France, their tourism appears to be on the rebound.](http://www.france24.com/en/20170208-france-tourism-rebounds-two-years-terror-attacks-paris-europe)", ">>{Rupperrt} : Bookings from Europe are down by 10%. It's not about the people banned, but the message, signals and political atmosphere which makes alternatives the more attractive travel destination. Why not go to BC, Mexico or Thailand instead of California?", ">>{undecidedly} : And how many jobs does that 185 million support? Some people won't be fine.", '>>{nerdmann13} : Whataboutism. We are talking about US tourism, stay on topic.', '>>{abelabelabel} : Oh. You mean awful and inconvenient and cruel and poorly crafted things that Trump administration does, enabled by GOP congress has obvious and inevitable consequences on the world stage?? If the rest of the world is wary, maybe they won\'t want to travel here, especially with the high volume of anecdotes from people who were "detained" at airports improperly? No shit.', ">>{LostinSZChina} : I would also hazard a guess that every time it's reported that a Australian children's book author that has been to the U.S. more than 100 times gets detained and harassed, or the story of a French academic gets detained for 10 hours and nearly deported is out there, or how even U.S. citizens on a domestic flight are asked to present papers upon arrival hits the internet, I would guess a lot of tourists would reconsider their options.", '>>{Monsoon29} : Travel/Muslim Ban aside, the lines for Disney rides might be shorter. So, at least you can have a few moments of fun as you contemplate the downfall of the United States.', '>>{PublicAccount1234} : When pushed on the issue Trump replies "It\'s Obama\'s fault. He left office and the moose-limbs no longer feel like they need to make a pilgrimage to his adopted country."', '>>{j-biggs} : Why do people ignore the fact that the majority of Muslims can still get in to the US, and that this only affects the same countries that Obama highlighted in his own work as president?', ">>{fyngyrz} : > is america great again yet? Well, it's sure grating on _my_ nerves...", '>>{fyngyrz} : > Why do people ignore the fact that the majority of Muslims can still get in to the US Because the border-crossing process has become a mass of unfair bullshit, and it\'s not about "the majority of muslims", it\'s about arbitrary evil treatment of harmless muslims based on a ridiculous metric. > and that this only affects the same countries that Obama highlighted in his own work as president? Because Obama highlighted these countries as worthy of careful scrutiny; he didn\'t say "no one from these countries can get in here." what Trump has done is _not_ equivalent to what Obama did. Obama didn\'t make that list to blacklist the entire population of all those countries. But that\'s what Trump is using it for. This is arbitrary, thoughtless, harmful, even evil.', ">>{modeler} : It's only *1 month* into the new administration. If (and this is an important assumption) this continues, then there will be much larger losses, and economic impact. Consider this article an early alert that all is not well here.", ">>{debadoobie} : Actually it only highlighted countries that Trump does not have business holdings in. The countries who have actually had immigrants that caused acts of terror weren't banned.", ">>{bjornartl} : It's not the law itself that's the problem for me. Not to say the law isnt a huge problem, but there's plenty of totalitarian regimes and backwater theocracies out there in the world. The US has just become another one of them. I dont think not travelling to these places, so long as it's safe, is the answer. Rather, if I wish for them to progress, I believe it helps if people travel and make connections across cultures. I'd visit Thailand even tho I highly disagree with their laws against criticising the royals. The problem however is how the law was executed. Usually a new law will be announced long before it happens, with a precise date on when it takes effect. But this muslim ban was put in place immediately, even affecting people who live and have greencards in the US if they happened to be on vacation when this happened. The way they suddenly demanded that people would open their phones, tablets and computers with private content or they would have to forfeit their journey, most of which would probably already be paid for. How can you trust your money on a travel destination like that? Even Saudi-Arabia eventually 'fixed' the issue of the tourist who was raped and then charged for extramarital intercourse. She did break the law. The laws are indeed horrendous, but no matter how horrible the law is the law and it's difficult for politicians or government to overturn the justice system or law enforcement in individual cases like that. But they did that, because a charge like this towards a western tourist would make their nation lose trust among tourists and business partners.", ">>{Alexa_play_music} : That's less than the decrease to Europe because of their problems. That is a nonissue.", ">>{Rupperrt} : Europe is doing rather good growth wise or at least better these days, apart from Greece and even they're back to growth of 3%. I am optimistic. You'll always welcome to visit. Drop a pm. It's also not a competition. If America is doing well, Europe is. And the other way around. They're huge markets to each other. Trump sticking to the script first time ever sent the stocks up 2% in Germany and 1,5 in Japan and US. It's all connected."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{HamsterSandwich} : Can Fox News survive the forces it unleashed on the 2016 election?', ">>{yourethepuppet} : If Trump starts his own network that's more along the lines of what Brietbart puts out, you'll see a lot of Fox's viewers start to watch Trump's network. Fox will probably survive, but will no longer be the most watched cable news channel.", ">>{GetTheLedPaintOut} : I know the GOP will survive, but this is a very interesting question. It's like watching the french revolution writ small. Trump News Network is about to declare war on Austria and you had better get on board Fox News or else...", ">>{di11deux} : Fox News finds itself in an uncomfortable position. Despite being the partisan agitator that helped birth the amniotic abomination we call the candidacy of Donald Trump, they are going to be a victim of two forces, one within their control, and the other outside. Fox has been insistent on reminding its viewers of the nefarious Obama Administration's ways, and has been conditioning its viewers to not only distrust other news sources, but to reject them entirely. As the Republic moves towards a more liberal, tolerant nation, Fox & Friends have sunk their teeth into their demographic and are holding on tight, even if it means artificially widening the partisan gap. The result, of course, is a dedicated and loyal demographic that doesn't look to get its news from anywhere else. But this loyal grouping is old, and its not growing. [Their viewership is the oldest in the buisness](http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/whos-got-the-oldest-cable-news-audience/280396), and Millennials are not exactly flocking to Fox either. For those younger viewers with similar political leanings, they tend to congregate around internet agitators like Drudge and Breitbart. So Fox has placed its bets on a demographic with an average life expectancy of 10 more years and has not been able to court a younger viewership. In the 2020's, Fox will likely shrink unless there is a serious re-branding effort.", '>>{Itsprobablysarcasm} : When you step back and look at what has played out, it is easy to see that the stage was set to eviscerate Fox News by Donald. Donald is gonna syphon off all the deplorables when he launches a Breitbart-backed TV channel of alt-right filth. They\'re not even gonna try to be "fair and balanced". They gonna go full Alex Jones. Roger Ailes was quickly picked up and likely played for his expertise, but now that they\'ve sucked the marrow from that carcass, he\'s been chucked. Fox News has a chance to, dare I say it, because a decent network for the non-deplorables sitting centre-right. And there is a lot of them. They\'re not loud and vocal like the pants-on-head idjits that was were the tea party and are now proud MAGAs, but they are still a force to be reckoned with. Fox News could be the "pragmatic middle"; but they gotta tone down the blatant partisanship and move away from being a "party" network to a "belief-set" network of holding ALL government accountable, regardless of party. Or, implode. Their choice.', '>>{ILoveGaryJohnson} : It\'s not an "if". For a narcissist like Trump, this election has probably been the best experience of his life, even if he loses. For over a year, all the media has been paying attention to him every time he farts and he looovess the attention. He won\'t be able to give it up. He will start TrumpTV and I\'m expecting it to actually be pretty huge. He already has a cult following.', ">>{texdeveloper} : Read this today, I found it relevant and quoted the main points below http://www.redstate.com/joesquire/2016/10/20/poll-republicans-falling-love-fox-news/ >YouGov's BrandIndex has shown Republicans put Fox News in their top 20 favorite brands for years. In 2014, it was No. 10, but last year it dipped to No. 15 on the list. This year? It's plummeted down to 50. However, before you think it's all going to CNN or MSNBC, they fell from the 1300s to the 1400s. >What is causing the Fox brand to fall? A mixture of things, I'd imagine. > 1) Ailes scandal. > 2) News personalities leaving the network. > 3) People who think they boost Trump too much. > 4) People who think they are totally against Trump. > I mean, 3 and 4 alone are probably a big chunk of their audience anyway. It's not that they're losing viewers so much as people just don't respect them. It also seems to be media-wide, but the substantial fall of Fox News is important. Elections have consequences, and this appears to be one of them. Fox has not covered itself in glory at all this year.", '>>{USAOne} : [That look you get when a Trump supporter attempts to rationalize voting for a Racist, Bigot, Woman hater](https://i.redd.it/xemt58ggaksx.jpg)', '>>{JMFR} : If Trump doesn\'t start a network, they\'ll slink back. Where else are they going to go? If he does start one, then Fox will probably re-brand itself as a "Classically Republican" network to try and hold onto the establishment people that aren\'t welcome in Trumpland.', '>>{thureb} : I think murdochs sons are trying to do just that. Supposedly they were behind ailes firing and are trying to push a much less conspiratorial approach. I guess we will see how it shakes out in the next 6 months.'], [">>{god_im_bored} : Donald Trump's 'Muslim ban' costs US travel industry an estimated $185m as tourism interest 'falls off a cliff'", '>>{stragen595} : It will be more if they are driving further down this street.', ">>{altuniverseyou} : If I was planning a trip and one country was arguing over laws about who can come and who can't I'd definitely decide to go somewhere else, whether I was affected by it or not.", ">>{PixelWhaticus} : The government will be fine. All of the people whose jobs revolve around tourism will not. And whether Kayak is legit or not, speaking as a Canadian, I don't plan on entering the US while Trump is in power, and I have plenty of friends and family who feel exactly the same.", '>>{Alexa_play_music} : As if there are that many people from those seven countries that travel here.', '>>{Maxwell69} : The estimated loss of $185 million comes from the Global Business Travel Association, not from Kayak.', ">>{Maxwell69} : To the US government that isn't so bad, but a lot of that money would have gone into local communities which will have a harder time making up for the loss of revenue.", '>>{adickshapedtongue} : As if only people from the target countries are the only ones being put-off.', ">>{dagwood222} : It's been a month and cracks are starting to show. It isn't the tourists from those seven nations, it's tourists from EU, China and Asia who look at the news and say, 'let's try Brazil or a safari instead of seeing NYC or Hollywood.' There are a lot of tourists out there who can choose to come to the US or not. A drop of 5-10% will be noticed.", ">>{dayrise} : We'll only see more of this as the isolationist policies get pushed through and Trump keeps finding ways to ratchet up tension with our allies. I question if we're even a safe place for our current legal immigrants, given the raids.", ">>{Perge192} : >“The US has historically been one of the most popular countries for **Brits, but searches to popular destinations falling by over half in one year is a massive shift.** With hotel prices also falling significantly, it may only be a matter of time before airlines follow suit. It will be interesting to see if it can bounce back in 2018,” she added. >Searches for flights to *Tampa and Orlando declined 58 per cent* while searches for *Miami were down 52 per cent* when compared to last year. Searches for *San Diego dropped by 43 per cent, Las Vegas by 36 per cent and Los Angeles 32 by per cent.* >Flight app\xa0Hopper\xa0analysed flight search demand from 122 international origins to the US for weeks immediately before and after Mr Trump's inauguration and in **February found that demand fell significantly after the travel ban was announced** So we have an administration actively hurting a thriving market. Way to go guys. Not only is he not bringing back your precious coal jobs, he's hurting other industries. Especially considering how much tourism helps with lower wage/lower skill work. And there will be idiots who will still support this ban, even though it was short sighted and is hurting Americans. I'm sure there are some wonderful social programs in place to help them transition to new jobs though! /s", ">>{Negative_Clank} : Considering the violence against any brown person, I wouldn't want to make it my first choice for a vacation", ">>{PixelWhaticus} : I doubt Trump is giving even the slightest thought to tourism. I've never once heard him say a blessed thing about tourists. All of his rhetoric points to protectionism and isolating the US from the rest of the world. Why would anyone who isn't white want to risk going stateside and run into trouble with people telling them to get out of their country? Even if media reports of hate crimes are overblown, which is a distinct possibility, I don't see many tourists wanting to take the risk. Hell, I'm as white as they come and I STILL don't want to go to the States, [if only because there's not a chance in hell I'm handing over my phone / laptop and all my passwords just to visit](https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/02/give-us-your-passwords/516315/), I dunno, Buffalo. [As for France, their tourism appears to be on the rebound.](http://www.france24.com/en/20170208-france-tourism-rebounds-two-years-terror-attacks-paris-europe)", ">>{Rupperrt} : Bookings from Europe are down by 10%. It's not about the people banned, but the message, signals and political atmosphere which makes alternatives the more attractive travel destination. Why not go to BC, Mexico or Thailand instead of California?", ">>{undecidedly} : And how many jobs does that 185 million support? Some people won't be fine.", '>>{nerdmann13} : Whataboutism. We are talking about US tourism, stay on topic.', '>>{abelabelabel} : Oh. You mean awful and inconvenient and cruel and poorly crafted things that Trump administration does, enabled by GOP congress has obvious and inevitable consequences on the world stage?? If the rest of the world is wary, maybe they won\'t want to travel here, especially with the high volume of anecdotes from people who were "detained" at airports improperly? No shit.', ">>{LostinSZChina} : I would also hazard a guess that every time it's reported that a Australian children's book author that has been to the U.S. more than 100 times gets detained and harassed, or the story of a French academic gets detained for 10 hours and nearly deported is out there, or how even U.S. citizens on a domestic flight are asked to present papers upon arrival hits the internet, I would guess a lot of tourists would reconsider their options.", '>>{Monsoon29} : Travel/Muslim Ban aside, the lines for Disney rides might be shorter. So, at least you can have a few moments of fun as you contemplate the downfall of the United States.', '>>{PublicAccount1234} : When pushed on the issue Trump replies "It\'s Obama\'s fault. He left office and the moose-limbs no longer feel like they need to make a pilgrimage to his adopted country."', '>>{j-biggs} : Why do people ignore the fact that the majority of Muslims can still get in to the US, and that this only affects the same countries that Obama highlighted in his own work as president?', ">>{fyngyrz} : > is america great again yet? Well, it's sure grating on _my_ nerves...", '>>{fyngyrz} : > Why do people ignore the fact that the majority of Muslims can still get in to the US Because the border-crossing process has become a mass of unfair bullshit, and it\'s not about "the majority of muslims", it\'s about arbitrary evil treatment of harmless muslims based on a ridiculous metric. > and that this only affects the same countries that Obama highlighted in his own work as president? Because Obama highlighted these countries as worthy of careful scrutiny; he didn\'t say "no one from these countries can get in here." what Trump has done is _not_ equivalent to what Obama did. Obama didn\'t make that list to blacklist the entire population of all those countries. But that\'s what Trump is using it for. This is arbitrary, thoughtless, harmful, even evil.', ">>{modeler} : It's only *1 month* into the new administration. If (and this is an important assumption) this continues, then there will be much larger losses, and economic impact. Consider this article an early alert that all is not well here.", ">>{debadoobie} : Actually it only highlighted countries that Trump does not have business holdings in. The countries who have actually had immigrants that caused acts of terror weren't banned.", ">>{bjornartl} : It's not the law itself that's the problem for me. Not to say the law isnt a huge problem, but there's plenty of totalitarian regimes and backwater theocracies out there in the world. The US has just become another one of them. I dont think not travelling to these places, so long as it's safe, is the answer. Rather, if I wish for them to progress, I believe it helps if people travel and make connections across cultures. I'd visit Thailand even tho I highly disagree with their laws against criticising the royals. The problem however is how the law was executed. Usually a new law will be announced long before it happens, with a precise date on when it takes effect. But this muslim ban was put in place immediately, even affecting people who live and have greencards in the US if they happened to be on vacation when this happened. The way they suddenly demanded that people would open their phones, tablets and computers with private content or they would have to forfeit their journey, most of which would probably already be paid for. How can you trust your money on a travel destination like that? Even Saudi-Arabia eventually 'fixed' the issue of the tourist who was raped and then charged for extramarital intercourse. She did break the law. The laws are indeed horrendous, but no matter how horrible the law is the law and it's difficult for politicians or government to overturn the justice system or law enforcement in individual cases like that. But they did that, because a charge like this towards a western tourist would make their nation lose trust among tourists and business partners.", ">>{Alexa_play_music} : That's less than the decrease to Europe because of their problems. That is a nonissue.", ">>{Rupperrt} : Europe is doing rather good growth wise or at least better these days, apart from Greece and even they're back to growth of 3%. I am optimistic. You'll always welcome to visit. Drop a pm. It's also not a competition. If America is doing well, Europe is. And the other way around. They're huge markets to each other. Trump sticking to the script first time ever sent the stocks up 2% in Germany and 1,5 in Japan and US. It's all connected."]]

classify and reply

['>>{Veritaste} : UC Davis Protests Cancel Event For Milo Yiannopoulos, Martin Shkreli', '>>{Fitbitnitwit} : Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren work to unify divided Democratic party', '>>{Solar_Dawn} : They can sell out together for a bargain price!', '>>{mcthornbody420} : Leaked Hillary Clinton emails show U.S. allies Saudi Arabia and Qatar supported ISIS', ">>{BearsNecessity} : Rep. Dana Rohrabacher has a plan to pay for Trump's border wall: Charge rich foreigners $1 million to become citizens", '>>{preciouspurple} : iPhone 6 screen stain after wiping down with rubbing alcohol?', '>>{Bcordea1} : That is quite odd. I also work in health care and wipe mine off with alcohol prep pads but never experienced that. Is it the screen protector that is stained?', '>>{bertcox} : Nice job, somebody has a different point of view so you shut them out. I think George Wallace used the same tactics.', ">>{andersac88} : Does that include his Trump's wife? (Yes I realize she became a citizen in '06)", '>>{astonishingpants} : I think I just heard part of the Statue of Liberty falling into the harbor.', ">>{BsledgeW} : No shit. They also helped back Al Qaeda Saudi Arabia is the world's worst ally. But we need them.", '>>{BLACK-GUY} : Anyone wanna ELI5 why we would want then donating to influence our presidential campaigns?', '>>{mrbarky} : Are they? If so it is not legal.', '>>{crxturbo} : Happened to my 6s it wont go awayi heated with heat gun till it turned the screen black', ">>{thewholedamnplanet} : Or tax American millionaires who voted for Trump to pay for it? Or have Trump himself pay for it? Isn't he a billionaire and wasn't it his fucking idea to begin with?", ">>{ImBeingHeldCaptive} : It's not a stain, you rubbed off the oleophobic coating on the screen, so that's permanent and you'll need to replace the screen.", ">>{BluAnimal} : Sad to see violent protests shut down opportunities to hear conflicting opinions and challenging your ideas. If you can't have an open forum and discussion in a University, where can you?", ">>{preciouspurple} : I removed the screen protector after I noticed something was wrong, so it's not the screen protector that's stained. Unfortunately I think I had a poor quality replacement and that's why it's never happened until now :(", '>>{mcthornbody420} : Four months ago Politifact found it half true. Wow, Reddit downvoting a Salon article... I wonder why? http://www.politifact.com/arizona/statements/2016/jul/11/donald-trump/did-hillary-clinton-take-money-countries-treat-wom/ Also from last year. http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2015/apr/20/reince-priebus/hillary-clinton-took-money-kings-four-countries-go/', ">>{mrbarky} : Ah. It's legal for them to contribute to a charity. I thought he was referring to campaign contributions. There is no evidence that I have heard of about contributing to any campaign. Edit and I didn't down vote you", ">>{Fitbitnitwit} : When I was a kid, we never got the 'brand name' toys for Christmas, usually some knock off. In a family of 6, I was damned glad to see anything. So..a note to you whiners out there about Bernie not being the chosen one: Grow the hell up. Hillary will do just fine. And if you think Trump, or some 3rd...4th Party pick will make you shine at the polls, you're wasting your vote, and embarrassing yourself. You can't always get what you want, just like everyday life. Deal with it.", ">>{idontrage123} : How come there's nothing about these leaks being upvoted in politics? If they were about Trump it would already be all over politics. Failing to see a fair representation of all stories", ">>{Simmo5150} : I've used alcohol wipes to clean my phone (health care) and never had a problem. It does leave a hazy residue that I buff off with a cloth. Is it pure alcohol or does it have any additives like clorhexadine?", ">>{mistermagicman} : You're not supposed to use anything abrasive or alcoholic to clean the screen. It has a coating that will rub off. In the future, just use a slightly moist (water) cloth.", ">>{trcsteve} : > Grow the hell up. Hillary will do just fine. No she won't. She's a corrupt, toxic entity. Like if your stretch arm strong poisoned you if you pulled on it, or if your lincoln logs were rife with splinters. If Barbie had razor blades sticking out of her, then your analogy would be accurate.", '>>{mr_charliejacobs} : Milo Yiannopoulos and Martin Sckreli are the perfect poster children of the so-called "alt-right (more accurately known as white nationalist.)', ">>{Mr_Lucius_Needful} : > Anyone wanna ELI5 why we would want then donating to influence our presidential campaigns? First off, Saudi Arabia hasn't donated to any Presidential campaign. Second, Saudi Arabia's donations(which means an/or individual(s)) that went to the Clinton foundation. Were approved by our government. But more importantly those donations(because it's a non-profit are public record) 90% of which were spent on medicine and treatment to those in poorer countries. Those donated funds also can not be used for political purposes. But more importantly when we have Super-Pac's that have provisions to allow anonymous donations to political parties. Why would anyone use a public entity such as a non-profit makes absolutely no sense.", ">>{mcthornbody420} : Oh I know you didn't. I'm on a list, lol. Anyway, The Post as did Times touched on all of this in Feb of last year. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/opinion/sunday/frank-bruni-hillary-clinton-jeb-bush-and-fund-raising-for-the-2016-presidential-race.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clintons-raised-nearly-2-billion-for-foundation-since-2001/2015/02/18/b8425d88-a7cd-11e4-a7c2-03d37af98440_story.html", ">>{ailboles} : Don't worry about implementation of this - Nobody will want to move here.", ">>{OnlyRadioheadLyrics} : You're telling us to grow up, but you sound like the one throwing the tantrum.", ">>{notnicolas} : Happened to me when I replaced the screen on my 5s. I'm sure it has to do with the cheap replacement screen. Took it to the Apple Store and had them re-replace the screen and it never happened again.", '>>{OptionalCookie} : ... Not sure if I buy that. I use alcohol to clean my screen and have never had this issue.', '>>{idontrage123} : What if the leaks were about Trump? Would they also amount to nothing?', '>>{BLACK-GUY} : Where did Hillary get her fortune? speaking fees alone? the clinton foundation is a known scam', ">>{preciouspurple} : I looked at the bottle and the only listed ingredients are isopropyl alcohol (70%) and purified water so no other additives. I'm just wondering why it was a problem this time as opposed to all the other times I've used alcohol to wipe my phone.", '>>{Quinnjester} : Dear lord make it stop...wtf...Lafayette is rolling in his grave.', '>>{LittleShrub} : Apparently, Republicans are completely out of ideas on how to pay for that stupid wall.', ">>{lilmanbigtalk} : No, /u/mistermagicman is absolutely right. It's called an [oleophobic coating] (http://www.phonearena.com/news/Oleophobic-coating--what-it-is-how-to-clean-your-phone-what-to-do-if-the-coating-wears-off_id65974) and it repels oils on your screen. It wears down with time and can be exacerbated with harsh cleaning solutions.", ">>{seltzeronmydesk} : Bernie Sanders: Elizabeth Warren also doesn't want to get barbelled.", ">>{smushednoodle} : It's true, but it doesn't sound like OP's problem. Since they said they can only see it when the phone is on that more than likely means they got moisture inside of their phone somehow.", ">>{insertnamehere987} : The alcohol isn't the problem necessarily, paper towels are abrasive.", ">>{Mr_Lucius_Needful} : > the clinton foundation is a known scam No it isn't. Stop lying when they're an actual non-profit foundation and their records are public, [Sandra Minuitti](http://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/where-does-clinton-foundation-money-go/) at Charity Navigator said citing only the 6 percent of the budget spent on grants as the sum total spent on charity by the foundation — as Willis and Fiorina did — is inaccurate. She referred us to page 10 of the 2013 990 form for the Clinton Foundation. When considering the amount spent on “charitable work,” she said, one would look not just at the amount in grants given to other charities, but all of the expenses in Column B for program services. That comes to 80.6 percent of spending. (The higher 89 percent figure we cited earlier comes from a CharityWatch analysis of the Clinton Foundation and its affiliates.) Unlike Donald's foundation which he uses to pay off [court settlements.](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-used-258000-from-his-charity-to-settle-legal-problems/2016/09/20/adc88f9c-7d11-11e6-ac8e-cf8e0dd91dc7_story.html) >Where did Hillary get her fortune? speaking fees alone? Yea, I want to refer to [Snookie](http://www.reuters.com/article/us-snooki-idUSTRE7305LQ20110401) who made over 30k for a single appearance at Rutgers. Imagine how much people would pay for a former defense attorney/Secretary of State/Senator. Donald Trump earned a staggering $1.5 million per speech at The Learning Annex’s ‘real estate wealth expos’ in 2006 and 2007. Since leaving office, the former President George W. Bush has made more than $15 million in speaking fees, apparently charging between $100,000 and $150,000 per speech. You would be surprised at how much someone could make speaking.", '>>{DaftDweller} : I\'d rather vote for Trump, or some 3rd or 4th party pick than waste my vote on a candidate whose ideals I don\'t agree with, and we\'re seeing plenty of voters who are in the same position. Do you really think Sanders supporters are going to suddenly "deal with" a candidate that supports whatever her top-paying donors wants? These are policies that more often than not conflict with the progressive ideology anyway. Hillary can now either court progressives and lose some of the moderate to Trump and the other parties, or court the moderates and lose some of these progressives to the other parties, but not both.', ">>{mistermagicman} : https://support.apple.com/en-us/ht207123 > Your iPhone has a fingerprint-resistant oleophobic—oil repellant—coating. This coating wears over time with normal use. Cleaning products and abrasive materials will further diminish the coating and might scratch your iPhone. Of course, I can't say for sure that alcohol will rub it off. Or perhaps, if you do it thoroughly, you tend to completely rub it off on the first go. But I'd stick to water for dedicated screen cleaning sprays.", ">>{drsjsmith} : Um, we have this already. It's called the [Green Card Through Investment.](https://www.uscis.gov/green-card/green-card-through-job/green-card-through-investment) Invest $1,000,000 anywhere in the USA, or just $500,000 in a targeted employment area, and you and your spouse and your unmarried children under the age of 21 all get green cards. Once you all have green cards, then it's just the usual waiting period and test to become citizens. Congratulations, Rep. Rohrabacher (R-CA) and Trump, you just reinvented the wheel.", '>>{ohheyitsryan5000} : Try using Screen Dr off Amazon. I ruined the oleophobic on my phone and this helped bring it back', ">>{tau-lepton} : Which will generate zero revenue, becoming a US citizen isn't worth a million dollars.", ">>{PopcornInMyTeeth} : No, see this is the fast line. Just like when we gut net neutrality. America is all about giving people the freedom of choice. Just not necessarily the ability to procure enough funds to access all those choices. Think of it like DLC. Isn't that a great business model to run freedom?? ^^/s", '>>{mr_charliejacobs} : campus police said there was no violence or property destruction, and no arrests were made.', ">>{Hadiya72} : Unite the Party and nominate Bernie and Warren, I think that might unite the party but I'm just a lone voter who doesn't feel the country needs Crooked Hillary in the White House, so what do I know.", '>>{mr_charliejacobs} : not exactly, he used dogs, police, billy clubs, guns, jails, arrests, beatings, that kind of thing.', '>>{Bernie_is_my_bitch} : Hillary Hillary Hillary!!!! Hey BernieBros thank you for your contribution to the Clinton campaign. We will honor bernies views and work hard to make an America that you and Bernie can be proud of. Bernie, Hillary and the rest of us welcome you with open arms. r/hillaryclinton #imwithher', ">>{TheYearTwentySixteen} : >Grow the hell up. Oh they will, and they'll vote Trump.", ">>{gochuBANG} : This is already a thing in the US and most countries, I'd imagine. I don't know what the dollar limit is in the US but you can be a dual citizen for 100k in a few Caribbean islands.", '>>{M_Onan_Batterload} : And Trump is already well aware of the EB-5 "Golden Visa" program: [Bloomberg:Trump Tower Funded by Rich Chinese Who Invest Cash for Visas](https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-03-07/trump-tower-financed-by-rich-chinese-who-invest-cash-for-visas)', ">>{Maginticon} : I availed of this. It was a walk in the park. It's funny too, the 500k was an investment in my *own* business. Not in the local economy.", '>>{xlxcx} : Wait... I thought Mexico was paying for it?', '>>{sleaze_bag_alert} : Might as well cut it down for scrap at this point...', '>>{redjelly3} : I will vote for the green party in a swing state and I will be getting exactly what I want. Have fun with your "unified" party.', '>>{JJWoolls} : Your business *is* an investment in the local economy.', ">>{Sallytoo} : It would've been sad. But there was no violence here.", ">>{Richafod} : They both nearly got booed off stage, I don't think it's working.", '>>{Sallytoo} : People are allowed to protest speeches in he United States, both legally and morally', '>>{DamagedHells} : Shouting against my shitty, bigot opinion is *LITERALLY* violence! No wonder Treasonous Trump thinks that leaks AGAINST HIM are literally akin to gassing an entire sect of the population. You special snowflakes are ***pathetic***.', '>>{bertcox} : Yelling at somebody is committing violence against them. Same thing they complain about.', '>>{PM_ME_CANKLES} : Would you invite David Duke to speak on campus? An IS recruiter? This guy can stand in a public area on a public university campus and say his piece to whoever will listen, so long as he\'s not inciting violence. *That\'s* what the first amendment entitles him to. It does not entitle him to having the university provide a venue, security, etc. for him. If the university is going to do that (paying for it with taxpayer dollars and student fees), there should be a legitimate academic interest in doing so. If you can tell me with a straight face there\'s a legitimate academic interest in inviting a grown man who describes his occupation as "super villain" and "professional troll," and whose sole claim to fame is a willingness to practice hate speech publicly, then our educational system has failed you.', '>>{PM_ME_CANKLES} : >yelling at somebody is committing violence against them. Man, I thought *liberals* loved safe spaces. Sticks and stones, bud!']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{mcthornbody420} : Leaked Hillary Clinton emails show U.S. allies Saudi Arabia and Qatar supported ISIS', ">>{BsledgeW} : No shit. They also helped back Al Qaeda Saudi Arabia is the world's worst ally. But we need them.", '>>{BLACK-GUY} : Anyone wanna ELI5 why we would want then donating to influence our presidential campaigns?', '>>{mrbarky} : Are they? If so it is not legal.', '>>{mcthornbody420} : Four months ago Politifact found it half true. Wow, Reddit downvoting a Salon article... I wonder why? http://www.politifact.com/arizona/statements/2016/jul/11/donald-trump/did-hillary-clinton-take-money-countries-treat-wom/ Also from last year. http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2015/apr/20/reince-priebus/hillary-clinton-took-money-kings-four-countries-go/', ">>{mrbarky} : Ah. It's legal for them to contribute to a charity. I thought he was referring to campaign contributions. There is no evidence that I have heard of about contributing to any campaign. Edit and I didn't down vote you", ">>{idontrage123} : How come there's nothing about these leaks being upvoted in politics? If they were about Trump it would already be all over politics. Failing to see a fair representation of all stories", ">>{Mr_Lucius_Needful} : > Anyone wanna ELI5 why we would want then donating to influence our presidential campaigns? First off, Saudi Arabia hasn't donated to any Presidential campaign. Second, Saudi Arabia's donations(which means an/or individual(s)) that went to the Clinton foundation. Were approved by our government. But more importantly those donations(because it's a non-profit are public record) 90% of which were spent on medicine and treatment to those in poorer countries. Those donated funds also can not be used for political purposes. But more importantly when we have Super-Pac's that have provisions to allow anonymous donations to political parties. Why would anyone use a public entity such as a non-profit makes absolutely no sense.", ">>{mcthornbody420} : Oh I know you didn't. I'm on a list, lol. Anyway, The Post as did Times touched on all of this in Feb of last year. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/opinion/sunday/frank-bruni-hillary-clinton-jeb-bush-and-fund-raising-for-the-2016-presidential-race.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clintons-raised-nearly-2-billion-for-foundation-since-2001/2015/02/18/b8425d88-a7cd-11e4-a7c2-03d37af98440_story.html", '>>{idontrage123} : What if the leaks were about Trump? Would they also amount to nothing?', '>>{BLACK-GUY} : Where did Hillary get her fortune? speaking fees alone? the clinton foundation is a known scam', ">>{Mr_Lucius_Needful} : > the clinton foundation is a known scam No it isn't. Stop lying when they're an actual non-profit foundation and their records are public, [Sandra Minuitti](http://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/where-does-clinton-foundation-money-go/) at Charity Navigator said citing only the 6 percent of the budget spent on grants as the sum total spent on charity by the foundation — as Willis and Fiorina did — is inaccurate. She referred us to page 10 of the 2013 990 form for the Clinton Foundation. When considering the amount spent on “charitable work,” she said, one would look not just at the amount in grants given to other charities, but all of the expenses in Column B for program services. That comes to 80.6 percent of spending. (The higher 89 percent figure we cited earlier comes from a CharityWatch analysis of the Clinton Foundation and its affiliates.) Unlike Donald's foundation which he uses to pay off [court settlements.](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-used-258000-from-his-charity-to-settle-legal-problems/2016/09/20/adc88f9c-7d11-11e6-ac8e-cf8e0dd91dc7_story.html) >Where did Hillary get her fortune? speaking fees alone? Yea, I want to refer to [Snookie](http://www.reuters.com/article/us-snooki-idUSTRE7305LQ20110401) who made over 30k for a single appearance at Rutgers. Imagine how much people would pay for a former defense attorney/Secretary of State/Senator. Donald Trump earned a staggering $1.5 million per speech at The Learning Annex’s ‘real estate wealth expos’ in 2006 and 2007. Since leaving office, the former President George W. Bush has made more than $15 million in speaking fees, apparently charging between $100,000 and $150,000 per speech. You would be surprised at how much someone could make speaking."], ['>>{preciouspurple} : iPhone 6 screen stain after wiping down with rubbing alcohol?', '>>{Bcordea1} : That is quite odd. I also work in health care and wipe mine off with alcohol prep pads but never experienced that. Is it the screen protector that is stained?', '>>{crxturbo} : Happened to my 6s it wont go awayi heated with heat gun till it turned the screen black', ">>{ImBeingHeldCaptive} : It's not a stain, you rubbed off the oleophobic coating on the screen, so that's permanent and you'll need to replace the screen.", ">>{preciouspurple} : I removed the screen protector after I noticed something was wrong, so it's not the screen protector that's stained. Unfortunately I think I had a poor quality replacement and that's why it's never happened until now :(", ">>{Simmo5150} : I've used alcohol wipes to clean my phone (health care) and never had a problem. It does leave a hazy residue that I buff off with a cloth. Is it pure alcohol or does it have any additives like clorhexadine?", ">>{mistermagicman} : You're not supposed to use anything abrasive or alcoholic to clean the screen. It has a coating that will rub off. In the future, just use a slightly moist (water) cloth.", ">>{notnicolas} : Happened to me when I replaced the screen on my 5s. I'm sure it has to do with the cheap replacement screen. Took it to the Apple Store and had them re-replace the screen and it never happened again.", '>>{OptionalCookie} : ... Not sure if I buy that. I use alcohol to clean my screen and have never had this issue.', ">>{preciouspurple} : I looked at the bottle and the only listed ingredients are isopropyl alcohol (70%) and purified water so no other additives. I'm just wondering why it was a problem this time as opposed to all the other times I've used alcohol to wipe my phone.", ">>{lilmanbigtalk} : No, /u/mistermagicman is absolutely right. It's called an [oleophobic coating] (http://www.phonearena.com/news/Oleophobic-coating--what-it-is-how-to-clean-your-phone-what-to-do-if-the-coating-wears-off_id65974) and it repels oils on your screen. It wears down with time and can be exacerbated with harsh cleaning solutions.", ">>{smushednoodle} : It's true, but it doesn't sound like OP's problem. Since they said they can only see it when the phone is on that more than likely means they got moisture inside of their phone somehow.", ">>{insertnamehere987} : The alcohol isn't the problem necessarily, paper towels are abrasive.", ">>{mistermagicman} : https://support.apple.com/en-us/ht207123 > Your iPhone has a fingerprint-resistant oleophobic—oil repellant—coating. This coating wears over time with normal use. Cleaning products and abrasive materials will further diminish the coating and might scratch your iPhone. Of course, I can't say for sure that alcohol will rub it off. Or perhaps, if you do it thoroughly, you tend to completely rub it off on the first go. But I'd stick to water for dedicated screen cleaning sprays.", '>>{ohheyitsryan5000} : Try using Screen Dr off Amazon. I ruined the oleophobic on my phone and this helped bring it back'], ['>>{Fitbitnitwit} : Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren work to unify divided Democratic party', '>>{Solar_Dawn} : They can sell out together for a bargain price!', ">>{Fitbitnitwit} : When I was a kid, we never got the 'brand name' toys for Christmas, usually some knock off. In a family of 6, I was damned glad to see anything. So..a note to you whiners out there about Bernie not being the chosen one: Grow the hell up. Hillary will do just fine. And if you think Trump, or some 3rd...4th Party pick will make you shine at the polls, you're wasting your vote, and embarrassing yourself. You can't always get what you want, just like everyday life. Deal with it.", ">>{trcsteve} : > Grow the hell up. Hillary will do just fine. No she won't. She's a corrupt, toxic entity. Like if your stretch arm strong poisoned you if you pulled on it, or if your lincoln logs were rife with splinters. If Barbie had razor blades sticking out of her, then your analogy would be accurate.", ">>{OnlyRadioheadLyrics} : You're telling us to grow up, but you sound like the one throwing the tantrum.", ">>{seltzeronmydesk} : Bernie Sanders: Elizabeth Warren also doesn't want to get barbelled.", '>>{DaftDweller} : I\'d rather vote for Trump, or some 3rd or 4th party pick than waste my vote on a candidate whose ideals I don\'t agree with, and we\'re seeing plenty of voters who are in the same position. Do you really think Sanders supporters are going to suddenly "deal with" a candidate that supports whatever her top-paying donors wants? These are policies that more often than not conflict with the progressive ideology anyway. Hillary can now either court progressives and lose some of the moderate to Trump and the other parties, or court the moderates and lose some of these progressives to the other parties, but not both.', ">>{Hadiya72} : Unite the Party and nominate Bernie and Warren, I think that might unite the party but I'm just a lone voter who doesn't feel the country needs Crooked Hillary in the White House, so what do I know.", '>>{Bernie_is_my_bitch} : Hillary Hillary Hillary!!!! Hey BernieBros thank you for your contribution to the Clinton campaign. We will honor bernies views and work hard to make an America that you and Bernie can be proud of. Bernie, Hillary and the rest of us welcome you with open arms. r/hillaryclinton #imwithher', ">>{TheYearTwentySixteen} : >Grow the hell up. Oh they will, and they'll vote Trump.", '>>{redjelly3} : I will vote for the green party in a swing state and I will be getting exactly what I want. Have fun with your "unified" party.', ">>{Richafod} : They both nearly got booed off stage, I don't think it's working."], ['>>{Veritaste} : UC Davis Protests Cancel Event For Milo Yiannopoulos, Martin Shkreli', '>>{bertcox} : Nice job, somebody has a different point of view so you shut them out. I think George Wallace used the same tactics.', ">>{BluAnimal} : Sad to see violent protests shut down opportunities to hear conflicting opinions and challenging your ideas. If you can't have an open forum and discussion in a University, where can you?", '>>{mr_charliejacobs} : Milo Yiannopoulos and Martin Sckreli are the perfect poster children of the so-called "alt-right (more accurately known as white nationalist.)', '>>{mr_charliejacobs} : campus police said there was no violence or property destruction, and no arrests were made.', '>>{mr_charliejacobs} : not exactly, he used dogs, police, billy clubs, guns, jails, arrests, beatings, that kind of thing.', ">>{Sallytoo} : It would've been sad. But there was no violence here.", '>>{Sallytoo} : People are allowed to protest speeches in he United States, both legally and morally', '>>{DamagedHells} : Shouting against my shitty, bigot opinion is *LITERALLY* violence! No wonder Treasonous Trump thinks that leaks AGAINST HIM are literally akin to gassing an entire sect of the population. You special snowflakes are ***pathetic***.', '>>{bertcox} : Yelling at somebody is committing violence against them. Same thing they complain about.', '>>{PM_ME_CANKLES} : Would you invite David Duke to speak on campus? An IS recruiter? This guy can stand in a public area on a public university campus and say his piece to whoever will listen, so long as he\'s not inciting violence. *That\'s* what the first amendment entitles him to. It does not entitle him to having the university provide a venue, security, etc. for him. If the university is going to do that (paying for it with taxpayer dollars and student fees), there should be a legitimate academic interest in doing so. If you can tell me with a straight face there\'s a legitimate academic interest in inviting a grown man who describes his occupation as "super villain" and "professional troll," and whose sole claim to fame is a willingness to practice hate speech publicly, then our educational system has failed you.', '>>{PM_ME_CANKLES} : >yelling at somebody is committing violence against them. Man, I thought *liberals* loved safe spaces. Sticks and stones, bud!'], [">>{BearsNecessity} : Rep. Dana Rohrabacher has a plan to pay for Trump's border wall: Charge rich foreigners $1 million to become citizens", ">>{andersac88} : Does that include his Trump's wife? (Yes I realize she became a citizen in '06)", '>>{astonishingpants} : I think I just heard part of the Statue of Liberty falling into the harbor.', ">>{thewholedamnplanet} : Or tax American millionaires who voted for Trump to pay for it? Or have Trump himself pay for it? Isn't he a billionaire and wasn't it his fucking idea to begin with?", ">>{ailboles} : Don't worry about implementation of this - Nobody will want to move here.", '>>{Quinnjester} : Dear lord make it stop...wtf...Lafayette is rolling in his grave.', '>>{LittleShrub} : Apparently, Republicans are completely out of ideas on how to pay for that stupid wall.', ">>{drsjsmith} : Um, we have this already. It's called the [Green Card Through Investment.](https://www.uscis.gov/green-card/green-card-through-job/green-card-through-investment) Invest $1,000,000 anywhere in the USA, or just $500,000 in a targeted employment area, and you and your spouse and your unmarried children under the age of 21 all get green cards. Once you all have green cards, then it's just the usual waiting period and test to become citizens. Congratulations, Rep. Rohrabacher (R-CA) and Trump, you just reinvented the wheel.", ">>{tau-lepton} : Which will generate zero revenue, becoming a US citizen isn't worth a million dollars.", ">>{PopcornInMyTeeth} : No, see this is the fast line. Just like when we gut net neutrality. America is all about giving people the freedom of choice. Just not necessarily the ability to procure enough funds to access all those choices. Think of it like DLC. Isn't that a great business model to run freedom?? ^^/s", ">>{gochuBANG} : This is already a thing in the US and most countries, I'd imagine. I don't know what the dollar limit is in the US but you can be a dual citizen for 100k in a few Caribbean islands.", '>>{M_Onan_Batterload} : And Trump is already well aware of the EB-5 "Golden Visa" program: [Bloomberg:Trump Tower Funded by Rich Chinese Who Invest Cash for Visas](https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-03-07/trump-tower-financed-by-rich-chinese-who-invest-cash-for-visas)', ">>{Maginticon} : I availed of this. It was a walk in the park. It's funny too, the 500k was an investment in my *own* business. Not in the local economy.", '>>{xlxcx} : Wait... I thought Mexico was paying for it?', '>>{sleaze_bag_alert} : Might as well cut it down for scrap at this point...', '>>{JJWoolls} : Your business *is* an investment in the local economy.']]

classify and reply

[">>{Dear_Leader_Trump_} : What We Know About The Gunman Who Was Sold On The 'Pizzagate' Conspiracy", '>>{1461DaysInHell} : He was slightly more motivated, but no more delusional that the average donny fan.', ">>{TimothyGonzalez} : So, I recently went from a LG Nexus 5 to an iPhone 7. Here's some things I've noticed so far.", '>>{theoneandonly78} : I recently switched back to IOS after 4 years on Android. Just got a 7 and sold my Nexus 5x. You are spot on about Siri and the build quality. I am impressed at IOS and how it has developed since I last used it. I miss the way Android handles notifications and I miss the persistent LED notification light. Other than those two things I am loving it.', ">>{DatDeLorean} : Curious, I find Siri to be superior to Google Now and Google Assistant. With Siri, I can tell her that she pronounces a contact's name incorrectly and dictate the pronunciation to her so that she improves - and she really does. As far as I know this isn't present with Google Now / Assistant. I also find that Siri opens up and performs a function not necessarily faster but much more smoothly than Google Now / Assistant, both of which tend to sort of stutter and freeze a bit from time to time as I ask them to open or switch to another app. Lastly I've been able to use Siri without error even in incredibly noisy areas, whereas with Google Now / Assistant I find myself having to frequently seek a quieter place to be able to use it conveniently which sort of defeats the point a lot of the time. I don't know if this is down to better voice processing capabilities or the result of better noise filtering (on either the hardware or software side) specific to the iPhone, but either way the end result has been quite a lot better for me. And funnily enough I'm Scottish, usually a nationality which voice processing technologies tend to have the most difficulty with in English.", ">>{TimothyGonzalez} : What is your experience with Google Now? As in, how long have you used it for? If you've used it for a decent time my disappointment with Siri could just be down to having to get the hang of it.", '>>{newmexicali} : Can I place a bet he was a bigly contributor on T_D?', '>>{TimothyGonzalez} : What about the headphone port? Have you bought bluetooth earphones?', ">>{DatDeLorean} : I've been using it since I got it on my Note 2 when it was first launched in the U.K., so I'm guessing 3 years or so now. Actually maybe a little more, I can't quite recall. It could be a matter of needing some adjusting time yeah. For me though it was an instantaneous improvement, as soon as I got my iPhone 7 Plus and begun using Siri I felt much more satisfied in using it.", '>>{Adnandiditfershure} : >According to a Facebook page that appears to belong to him listed under the name Maddison Welch, he has "liked" both InfoWars and editor Alex Jones I, for one, am shocked, SHOCKED...', '>>{ObviousDuh} : Sales of the current pro iPad is so bad they lowered the price by $100 so Mashable thinks they will add these "extras" and charge more? I think their writers have just given up.', ">>{justeducation} : Isn't the iPad line basically all iPad Pros, then what's the point of adding the Pro moniker?", ">>{Davcoss} : I owned nexus 4 and 5, then switched to iphone 5s and got bored so i switched to nexus 6p and for no reason I switched again to iPhone 6S, used it for a few months before switched to galaxy s6 then note 5 then s7 but now I'm using an iPhone 7. I can safely say iPhones satisfy me more than android flagships because despite beung flagships, they still had hiccups, lags and slowdowns no matter stock or custom roms.", '>>{Cheezewiz239} : You could just use the EarPods they come with or the cable it comes with that acts as a headphone port', ">>{Usawasfun} : We know Trump won't tweet about it, that's for sure.", ">>{MacTaggerHK} : This is exactly how I feel. I'm happy I made the switch but I really hope Siri can improve and that the notification mess get fixed. Why the swipe and then press clear? I also kind of miss having the small icons at the top letting me know which apps have active notifications. I found that to be easier than the red circles with the numbers everywhere.", ">>{notjabba} : The birther president and his army of crazy idiots. If you'll believe one falsehood in the face of evidence, you will believe anything. Welcome to 1984.", '>>{huskiesHTT} : >Not including a headphone port is incredibly inconvenient and stupid Then why did you buy it?', '>>{justviewing2} : Trump Terrorist is my phrase for it.', ">>{TimothyGonzalez} : Because of reasons not related to the lack of headphone jack? It's a beautiful phone with a fantastic camera. I guess the camera was my greatest reason for buying it.", '>>{Bernerberry} : Call him what he is - a terrorist who was inspired by fake propaganda online.', '>>{maybebaked} : iPad mini Pro 9 air XL. Now with only 1 port!', ">>{Sidwill} : Any attorney's here wanna give an over/under on if this guy serves times and how long?", ">>{TimothyGonzalez} : Hey if my phone ever breaks I'll know who to call! (The guy with a military-grade stockpile of smartphones)", ">>{KimJongSkill492} : They're running out of marketable adjectives and modifiers to add onto the end of their products!", ">>{RichardJasonSavage} : So people who buy it can finally admit they're a pro at something in life.", '>>{person95} : The "pro" is the one with the digitizer and the pencil support. I think they\'ll eventually bring that to all their sizes, and keep "pro" for the largest meanest one they have.', '>>{justeducation} : Pro is now. The generation of iPads being released are all Pros.', '>>{ResistTrumpAlways} : LOL look at that gun-nut. Not all gun-nuts are bad, some I assume are good people.', '>>{theoneandonly78} : The lack of a head phone jack is kind of a pain in the ass. But I use Bluetooth headphones a lot too.', '>>{pastelfruits} : I think they mean why not get a 6s plus if the headphone is important. Theyre basically the same phone', ">>{temba_hisarmswide_} : I'm sorry man but your experience is horribly outdated. That phone was released in 2012. I've been pretty happy with iOS since my switch from Android, but Siri might be the most objective downgrade. Everything else has its own reason and philosophy, but Siri is just worse at the exact same thing.", ">>{sonofagunn} : If he were Muslim, wouldn't such an article as this mention it? Why not mention he's Christian?", '>>{DatDeLorean} : I upgraded from the Note 2. :P I\'ve also used it extensively on my BlackBerry Priv (Snapdragon 808), my Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge, my sister\'s Huawei P9 for a decent while both during and after setting it up for her... and a few short times with other friends\' various devices. I\'ve just never found it to be consistently responsive to me. Once Google Now/Assistant is actively loaded in memory, it\'s fairly fine at being responsive. But unlike with Siri, it is not part of the system. It can and does get unloaded from active memory, and as soon as it does it either doesn\'t respond to "Ok Google" at all or takes a fair while to respond / react. Siri for me is always available and always responds as soon as I call for her or hold the home button. There\'s never any delay, never any sluggishness in responding. Google Now/Assistant can be just as fast, sometimes even faster... but it\'s nowhere near as consistent in my experience, and that makes it unpredictable at best and frustrating at worst.', '>>{Brostradamus_} : Hold on, let me just grab my Samsung Galaxy S 6 Edge Plus!', ">>{Grig134} : If he was a Muslim, he'd be dead already and 5 of 25 top stories in /r/all.", ">>{Writtensine6} : I used a 5S, then changed to a Galaxy Note 4 then a lg G4 before switching back to a iPhone 7. To me personally Touch ID is one of the best feature an iPhone has. I also personally prefer google now on my G4 because I can just access it by swiping up the home button on lollipop. Who the hell still uses Siri lol. The lack of headphone jack doesn't bother me anyway, I'll just use a wireless headphone.", '>>{Davcoss} : ***waits for a call***', ">>{sjchoking} : I'd prefer that Apple kill the Air line and rename the iPad Pro 9.7 to iPad and this reported iPad Mini Pro replace the current mini line. Then rename the iPad Pro 12.9 to iPad Plus. So it would be 3 lines: iPad Mini (7.9) , iPad (9.7) , iPad Plus (12.9).", ">>{papahippo} : No. It's not a get used to it situation. Your points are 100% accurate.", ">>{Hailtothething} : Yeah, I'm a pro redditor, and pro porn searcher now.", '>>{borgosanjacopo} : But don\'t you see? All white people are terrorists or terrorist sympathisers. If these so called "moderate white people" don\'t support this terrorism, why don\'t they publicly apologise on behalf of all white people?!', '>>{altnumber10} : I publicly apologize and disavow him. Christianity is a religion of peace.', '>>{PizzusChrist} : So is this guy the village idiot or just the village?', '>>{pissbum-emeritus} : The propaganda is real, as are the reactions it inspires.', '>>{gonzone} : Some of the comments over there on this fake news story would strongly indicate you win that bet.', '>>{i_am_losing_my_mind} : And there wouldn\'t be so many discussions revolving around his "mental health".', ">>{2fingers} : I'm no attorney, but assuming the article is correct about his previous arrest record, this guy is headed to prison for some serious time.", '>>{tsdguy} : > Not including a headphone port is incredibly inconvenient and stupid. For you. For the majority it makes no different and for a large majority of the folks that it does matter the Lightning adapter works perfectly fine.', '>>{Tackbracka} : Without reading I am guessing: Owned multiple MAGA hats. Suscribed to Infowars on Youtube. Denies the last 3 or 4 mass shootings as "false flags" Has a criminal record involving drugs and minors. How much did I have right?', '>>{bracesthrowaway} : Nope. Obama and the Muslims did this with help from left wing occultist pedophiles.', '>>{Rustythepipe} : Hope they finally put him away forever with that sort of history.', '>>{Quenadian} : Real propaganda... False information... If I may...', ">>{tsdguy} : Fortunately this is such a low percentage of people that it's irrelevant.", ">>{majnus} : You are the first person I've ever seen to say Siri is better", '>>{gnoani} : > Denies the last 3 or 4 mass shootings as "false flags" > They\'re over there now disregarding this shooting as a false flag, designed to stop their totally legitimate imgur-based investigation.', ">>{enslavedroosters} : Soros had a part to play somewhere also. Can't forget him.", '>>{007meow} : You mean this false flag? ^^/s', '>>{TimothyGonzalez} : Hey did you know you can set the iPhone to have a LED notification light too? Just discovered this, thought you might not be aware!', '>>{theoneandonly78} : Yeah I knew that. I was talking more about a persistent notification light like for example what Samsung phones have. But thx for sharing.', '>>{rollerhen} : That was odd about the kid he hit with his car.', '>>{bvcxy} : They usually mention being muslim because its connected to the crime.', ">>{DatDeLorean} : ¯\\\\\\_(ツ)_/¯ Maybe I'm just weird.", '>>{Marino4K} : People need to just jump on the Bluetooth headphone train already.', '>>{enzyme69} : I think Siri is better, and will be smarter.', ">>{lGoSpursGol} : I feel like it's not and that answer is a cop out. Wanting to charge your phone while listening to it is so common especially in the car. I hate that we make excuses to make it ok for companies to keep doing what they're doing.", ">>{BrothaBeejus} : I don't think it is. Every single person I know that has upgraded to a 7 complains about it", ">>{DatDeLorean} : Yeah that's true. Well, besides the improved camera I guess. And the improved antenna lines. And the improved screen. And the improved battery life. And the improved CPU. And the improved GPU. And the new stereo speakers. And the waterproof rating. And the improved taptic feedback engine. But yeah they're pretty much the same phone.", ">>{sirjere} : It's in settings under general->accessibility->hearing-> LED flash for Alerts", ">>{squall2099} : Sound like me lol. Went back and forth with iOS and android , iPhones, galaxy's, nexus, htc. Had them all, kept going back to iOS because of stability. Always had some kind of issue with android devices, iPhones aren't perfect but it gets the Job done right", '>>{AZwildcatsNT} : Nexus 5 was my phone before I got the 6s Plus, I miss it so much :(', ">>{uncertain-ithink} : Apple has opened up Siri so you can use Siri commands to do things with third party apps. So you could ask for directions on google maps. But that's up to Google to actually support it, and I doubt google will do it.", '>>{Ashdown} : And not a single person that I know who has a 7 complains about it. ¯\\_(ツ)_/¯', '>>{Healer_of_arms} : ¯\\\\\\_(ツ)\\_/¯', ">>{Fendahl_core} : Having only a single port that is used for both charging and headphones is impractical and annoying. Anyone who makes excuses for this is the worst kind of Apple apologist honestly. The argument that Apple needed the space in the phone is specious. Will people eventually get used to it? Yes, most of us will adapt and deal with it just like we do every time Apple eliminates yet another feature in the pursuit of thinner, lighter devices and fatter and wider profit margins. If Apple had included wireless charging or AirPods with the phone so that nothing was lost, it would have been forgivable. The way it is, the customer gained exactly nothing. We just *lost* functionality. And Apple probably added another $2-3 in profit on an already obscenely overpriced phon by eliminating a part. Apple makes great products. I like them. I've been using them for more than 30 years in fact. But I never shrink from criticizing them. I'm a fan, but not a *fan boy*. I don't appreciate it when I feel like Apple is giving us all a bit of a 'fuck you' as they sometimes do. If I'm honest, I miss the days when Apple was hungry and had a little more humility and more creative juice. I am happy to have seem them go from financial distress in the 1990s to becoming the most valuable company in the world. That was a miracle. But I'm not always crazy about the decisions they make. With all the money they have I feel like they are just coasting on fumes sometimes. Barely trying. That and they are arrogant sometimes. The over-reliance on iPhone for 80% of their profits is alarming too. Seems unwise. But what do I know....", ">>{pastelfruits} : You can list all the things that have changed slightly but for the vast majority of people they would only tell the phones apart by the appearance. They have near the exact same experience which is what actually matters not minor increases in statistics Also stereo speakers on a mobile phone? That's idiotic. And you can have a taptic engine, higher waterproof rating with headphones. If I'm going for a phone based on a camera buying an iPhone isn't clever at all theyre are much better camera phones.", ">>{scoobysnatcher} : Oh, right, the flash. It's cool until you get messages in the middle of the night and enter a strobe nightmare. :-P", ">>{AH_MLP} : Buying one of the only smartphones that doesn't have a headphone jack when a headphone jack is something that matters to you is incredibly stupid", ">>{AH_MLP} : Yes, it's the newest iPhone available so I think it's ridiculous that people buying it don't understand that they are also gonna have to upgrade their other hardware. If you can't afford to upgrade your shit across the board, i.e. getting a Bluetooth adapter for your car, buying new headphones; then you obviously don't need the newest and most expensive smartphone available today. People complaining that the new iPhone isn't compatible with their old headphones or can't charge and listen to music at the same time in their 2005 Honda Accord cause it only has one lighting port aren't the kid of people who need to be buying premium smartphones as soon as they come out.", ">>{hobo_on_oltorf} : I've had my 7+ JB since release date and never once needed to both charge and listen to music... I've never found myself in a situation where both of those were necessary at the same time. If I need to charge it it's the end of the day and I plug it in when I go to bed. If I'm listening to music it's daytime and I'm at work or hanging out. My battery lasts all day. Without fail. Of course, people will always find something to complain about, usually using scenarios that don't exist in the real world. But whatever lol enjoy being bitter about inconsequential things.", ">>{somebodystolemyname} : I'll be honest, I thought it would be a huge issue but the only time I ran into needing to charge it while listening to music was on a road trip for 24 hours straight with it plugged into my aux port.", ">>{CTr1gga} : My 2008 car does not have Bluetooth audio, only an aux port. I work long hours and when I head home on my long commute I want to listen to some music on my phone. But depending on how often I used my phone throughout the day, I also need a charge. It's literally impossible for me to do both now. I love the phone, but ignoring that it is a removed feature and convenience is incredibly ignorant of you. Just because YOU don't need to doesn't mean other people don't. I also have 2016 car that is my weekend car that has all the features so it's a non issue there. But it is not my daily driver. Not everyone can afford newer model cars where this is no longer an issue, so I imagine a lot of people probably have the same issue I do on my daily work commute.", ">>{domeforaklondikebar} : Honestly, its so far from being useful that unless you actually have a disability that would be helped by that setting, it shouldn't be mentioned as an Android LED replacement. I've seen two people use it in public, both times they didn't even notice. It just distracts the people across from you.", '>>{domeforaklondikebar} : Sounds like difference in usage cases. I miss being able to just activate Google Now and just speak a random phrase that it immediately Googles with good contextual actions and information. Id try the search on Siri on my iPad and it would just ask me what I meant by that phrase. Also, my Android phone at the time picked up audio better in an empty room, so YMMV I guess.', '>>{DatDeLorean} : Stereo speakers on a mobile phone are idiotic? Wut.', ">>{DatDeLorean} : I didn't say I agreed with the removal of the headphone port (I don't). I was just pointing out that the guy I was replying to was wrong to state that the iPhone 6S and 7 are pretty much the 'same phone'.", '>>{DatDeLorean} : I did notice that Siri doesn\'t just automatically search the web for things like Google Now / Assistant does, but I don\'t mind that. If I want her to search the web for something I just say "hey Siri, google..." or "hey Siri search duck duck go for...".', ">>{pastelfruits} : Yes it's idiotic. They are millimeters apart it makes no sense. And it's not even real. There's only one speaker at the bottom, the second grille is fake.", ">>{DatDeLorean} : Heh. Only the right grille has a speaker. The second speaker is actually the earpiece at the top of the phone. It's meant for stereo in landscape mode, not vertical. Even if both were on the bottom though, they wouldn't be 'idiotic'. You'd still hear a bit of stereo separation, and you'd still have louder volume than a single speaker.", '>>{EMINEM_4Evah} : Came from a Note 7 to an iPhone 7 Plus So far liking iPhones. Even with the removal of the headphone jack I can live without it in the end.', '>>{Reapka} : Nexus 5 was my last Android phone before switching to iOS for good...', ">>{hobo_on_oltorf} : My car stereo is treated by my phone as a dock. It charges my phone and plays audio at the same time. It's from 2010, which definitely isn't new in any sense. Maybe these people shouldn't be buying brand new phones when they don't even have a car that's from this decade? Just a thought. Priorities eh?", ">>{CTr1gga} : And who exactly are you to tell people that a new car is more important than a new phone? Which is probably the dumbest thing I've ever heard by the way. It's almost like people have more realistic and different priorities than you.", ">>{hobo_on_oltorf} : Lol considering you have both... I dunno why you're complaining. I'm saying if you're spending a thousand dollars on a phone but your car can't even support it, why bother? If your transportation is so old it can't support an iPhone, why are you buying a new iPhone? People are dumb. Why are you being offended on behalf of people that aren't you?", ">>{CTr1gga} : I'm not complaining, I'm speaking for people that most definitely have the same issue as I do on commutes. Expecting people to have a 2016 car instead of a 2016 phone is completely moronic and unrealistic of you. Your fanboyism is incredibly obvious", ">>{hobo_on_oltorf} : I'm not even a fanboy lmao, I don't own a single Mac. I never have. Is everyone that disagrees with you a moron and a fanboy? Why do you have to insult people that don't think the same? You get way too angry about people having a different opinion. It's my opinion that *if* everything you own is too old to support your thousand dollar phone, you should probably get some new stuff before you buy something that you can't use with anything else. That doesn't exactly mean getting a new car, you could just swap out your deck. But whatever, just take a chill pill and calm down man. No need to get so riled up.", ">>{CTr1gga} : I didn't call you a moron. Reading comprehension is not your forte, not worth have a discussion with. Have a good one", '>>{hobo_on_oltorf} : A "discussion?" All you did was sit here and insult me because I disagreed haha. Later man, try being a bit more calm and collected when arguing, it\'ll do you some good.', ">>{TheDonaldNY} : That's what he's saying. He's saying that the Note 2 isn't an accurate representation of Google's voice recognition as it stands today. Compare modern Siri to modern Google Voice Search. Siri is just terrible. And this is coming from someone who loves their iphone.", ">>{DatDeLorean} : Like I said, I upgraded from the Note 2. I owned an S6 Edge, then a BlackBerry Priv... the S6 was a flagship device, I'd say it's fairly representative of most other flagship devices when it comes to Google Now / Assistant performance.", '>>{ithehappy} : Thanks for posting this. I am making the move to it from Pixel, I know I will love the consistency of fluidity but those points did come to my mind, and the camera you find great because you coming from a Nexus 5, otherwise, well.... However, there is no way you can use Google Assistant on iPhone 7? Someone mentioned something like that on a Youtube video I think, probably I was drunk or something.', ">>{TimothyGonzalez} : the camera you find great because you coming from a Nexus 5 Are you saying it's not a good camera? Also are you saying the Nexus 5 camera wasnt good? Aside from absolutely infuriatingly sucking at focussing properly, I loved the Nexus 5. I took some great pics with that phone that look like they were taken with a slr!", ">>{TimothyGonzalez} : Yeah so I made the exact same switch. Don't you get frustrated with Siri?", ">>{ithehappy} : LOL that's good for you mate, that you were able to take shots that good with Nexus 5. Nexus 5's camera was average at best, even at the time of its release, it was never meant to be a good camera phone at first place. iPhone 7's camera is very good, but it simply can't match with the likes of Pixel, S7, G6, or P10 etc.", '>>{tsdguy} : Haha. Yea, every single person. So that translates into EVERY iPhone 7 users has those complaints. Sure.', ">>{tsdguy} : But it's not common. You're projecting your own specific needs on other people and that's not helpful. The population of people that have cars that only have AUX jacks and need to charge while they're driving is I hope you'll admit very low. And you CAN buy an adapter to do just that. So if you think a company can make anything that is perfect for 100% of their customers you're sadly mistaken. There isn't any iPhone 7 users that can't be accommodated either as it is or with the purchase of an inexpensive adapter."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{TimothyGonzalez} : So, I recently went from a LG Nexus 5 to an iPhone 7. Here's some things I've noticed so far.", '>>{theoneandonly78} : I recently switched back to IOS after 4 years on Android. Just got a 7 and sold my Nexus 5x. You are spot on about Siri and the build quality. I am impressed at IOS and how it has developed since I last used it. I miss the way Android handles notifications and I miss the persistent LED notification light. Other than those two things I am loving it.', ">>{DatDeLorean} : Curious, I find Siri to be superior to Google Now and Google Assistant. With Siri, I can tell her that she pronounces a contact's name incorrectly and dictate the pronunciation to her so that she improves - and she really does. As far as I know this isn't present with Google Now / Assistant. I also find that Siri opens up and performs a function not necessarily faster but much more smoothly than Google Now / Assistant, both of which tend to sort of stutter and freeze a bit from time to time as I ask them to open or switch to another app. Lastly I've been able to use Siri without error even in incredibly noisy areas, whereas with Google Now / Assistant I find myself having to frequently seek a quieter place to be able to use it conveniently which sort of defeats the point a lot of the time. I don't know if this is down to better voice processing capabilities or the result of better noise filtering (on either the hardware or software side) specific to the iPhone, but either way the end result has been quite a lot better for me. And funnily enough I'm Scottish, usually a nationality which voice processing technologies tend to have the most difficulty with in English.", ">>{TimothyGonzalez} : What is your experience with Google Now? As in, how long have you used it for? If you've used it for a decent time my disappointment with Siri could just be down to having to get the hang of it.", '>>{TimothyGonzalez} : What about the headphone port? Have you bought bluetooth earphones?', ">>{DatDeLorean} : I've been using it since I got it on my Note 2 when it was first launched in the U.K., so I'm guessing 3 years or so now. Actually maybe a little more, I can't quite recall. It could be a matter of needing some adjusting time yeah. For me though it was an instantaneous improvement, as soon as I got my iPhone 7 Plus and begun using Siri I felt much more satisfied in using it.", ">>{Davcoss} : I owned nexus 4 and 5, then switched to iphone 5s and got bored so i switched to nexus 6p and for no reason I switched again to iPhone 6S, used it for a few months before switched to galaxy s6 then note 5 then s7 but now I'm using an iPhone 7. I can safely say iPhones satisfy me more than android flagships because despite beung flagships, they still had hiccups, lags and slowdowns no matter stock or custom roms.", '>>{Cheezewiz239} : You could just use the EarPods they come with or the cable it comes with that acts as a headphone port', ">>{MacTaggerHK} : This is exactly how I feel. I'm happy I made the switch but I really hope Siri can improve and that the notification mess get fixed. Why the swipe and then press clear? I also kind of miss having the small icons at the top letting me know which apps have active notifications. I found that to be easier than the red circles with the numbers everywhere.", '>>{huskiesHTT} : >Not including a headphone port is incredibly inconvenient and stupid Then why did you buy it?', ">>{TimothyGonzalez} : Because of reasons not related to the lack of headphone jack? It's a beautiful phone with a fantastic camera. I guess the camera was my greatest reason for buying it.", ">>{TimothyGonzalez} : Hey if my phone ever breaks I'll know who to call! (The guy with a military-grade stockpile of smartphones)", '>>{theoneandonly78} : The lack of a head phone jack is kind of a pain in the ass. But I use Bluetooth headphones a lot too.', '>>{pastelfruits} : I think they mean why not get a 6s plus if the headphone is important. Theyre basically the same phone', ">>{temba_hisarmswide_} : I'm sorry man but your experience is horribly outdated. That phone was released in 2012. I've been pretty happy with iOS since my switch from Android, but Siri might be the most objective downgrade. Everything else has its own reason and philosophy, but Siri is just worse at the exact same thing.", '>>{DatDeLorean} : I upgraded from the Note 2. :P I\'ve also used it extensively on my BlackBerry Priv (Snapdragon 808), my Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge, my sister\'s Huawei P9 for a decent while both during and after setting it up for her... and a few short times with other friends\' various devices. I\'ve just never found it to be consistently responsive to me. Once Google Now/Assistant is actively loaded in memory, it\'s fairly fine at being responsive. But unlike with Siri, it is not part of the system. It can and does get unloaded from active memory, and as soon as it does it either doesn\'t respond to "Ok Google" at all or takes a fair while to respond / react. Siri for me is always available and always responds as soon as I call for her or hold the home button. There\'s never any delay, never any sluggishness in responding. Google Now/Assistant can be just as fast, sometimes even faster... but it\'s nowhere near as consistent in my experience, and that makes it unpredictable at best and frustrating at worst.', ">>{Writtensine6} : I used a 5S, then changed to a Galaxy Note 4 then a lg G4 before switching back to a iPhone 7. To me personally Touch ID is one of the best feature an iPhone has. I also personally prefer google now on my G4 because I can just access it by swiping up the home button on lollipop. Who the hell still uses Siri lol. The lack of headphone jack doesn't bother me anyway, I'll just use a wireless headphone.", '>>{Davcoss} : ***waits for a call***', ">>{papahippo} : No. It's not a get used to it situation. Your points are 100% accurate.", '>>{tsdguy} : > Not including a headphone port is incredibly inconvenient and stupid. For you. For the majority it makes no different and for a large majority of the folks that it does matter the Lightning adapter works perfectly fine.', ">>{tsdguy} : Fortunately this is such a low percentage of people that it's irrelevant.", ">>{majnus} : You are the first person I've ever seen to say Siri is better", '>>{TimothyGonzalez} : Hey did you know you can set the iPhone to have a LED notification light too? Just discovered this, thought you might not be aware!', '>>{theoneandonly78} : Yeah I knew that. I was talking more about a persistent notification light like for example what Samsung phones have. But thx for sharing.', ">>{DatDeLorean} : ¯\\\\\\_(ツ)_/¯ Maybe I'm just weird.", '>>{Marino4K} : People need to just jump on the Bluetooth headphone train already.', '>>{enzyme69} : I think Siri is better, and will be smarter.', ">>{lGoSpursGol} : I feel like it's not and that answer is a cop out. Wanting to charge your phone while listening to it is so common especially in the car. I hate that we make excuses to make it ok for companies to keep doing what they're doing.", ">>{BrothaBeejus} : I don't think it is. Every single person I know that has upgraded to a 7 complains about it", ">>{DatDeLorean} : Yeah that's true. Well, besides the improved camera I guess. And the improved antenna lines. And the improved screen. And the improved battery life. And the improved CPU. And the improved GPU. And the new stereo speakers. And the waterproof rating. And the improved taptic feedback engine. But yeah they're pretty much the same phone.", ">>{sirjere} : It's in settings under general->accessibility->hearing-> LED flash for Alerts", ">>{squall2099} : Sound like me lol. Went back and forth with iOS and android , iPhones, galaxy's, nexus, htc. Had them all, kept going back to iOS because of stability. Always had some kind of issue with android devices, iPhones aren't perfect but it gets the Job done right", '>>{AZwildcatsNT} : Nexus 5 was my phone before I got the 6s Plus, I miss it so much :(', ">>{uncertain-ithink} : Apple has opened up Siri so you can use Siri commands to do things with third party apps. So you could ask for directions on google maps. But that's up to Google to actually support it, and I doubt google will do it.", '>>{Ashdown} : And not a single person that I know who has a 7 complains about it. ¯\\_(ツ)_/¯', '>>{Healer_of_arms} : ¯\\\\\\_(ツ)\\_/¯', ">>{Fendahl_core} : Having only a single port that is used for both charging and headphones is impractical and annoying. Anyone who makes excuses for this is the worst kind of Apple apologist honestly. The argument that Apple needed the space in the phone is specious. Will people eventually get used to it? Yes, most of us will adapt and deal with it just like we do every time Apple eliminates yet another feature in the pursuit of thinner, lighter devices and fatter and wider profit margins. If Apple had included wireless charging or AirPods with the phone so that nothing was lost, it would have been forgivable. The way it is, the customer gained exactly nothing. We just *lost* functionality. And Apple probably added another $2-3 in profit on an already obscenely overpriced phon by eliminating a part. Apple makes great products. I like them. I've been using them for more than 30 years in fact. But I never shrink from criticizing them. I'm a fan, but not a *fan boy*. I don't appreciate it when I feel like Apple is giving us all a bit of a 'fuck you' as they sometimes do. If I'm honest, I miss the days when Apple was hungry and had a little more humility and more creative juice. I am happy to have seem them go from financial distress in the 1990s to becoming the most valuable company in the world. That was a miracle. But I'm not always crazy about the decisions they make. With all the money they have I feel like they are just coasting on fumes sometimes. Barely trying. That and they are arrogant sometimes. The over-reliance on iPhone for 80% of their profits is alarming too. Seems unwise. But what do I know....", ">>{pastelfruits} : You can list all the things that have changed slightly but for the vast majority of people they would only tell the phones apart by the appearance. They have near the exact same experience which is what actually matters not minor increases in statistics Also stereo speakers on a mobile phone? That's idiotic. And you can have a taptic engine, higher waterproof rating with headphones. If I'm going for a phone based on a camera buying an iPhone isn't clever at all theyre are much better camera phones.", ">>{scoobysnatcher} : Oh, right, the flash. It's cool until you get messages in the middle of the night and enter a strobe nightmare. :-P", ">>{AH_MLP} : Buying one of the only smartphones that doesn't have a headphone jack when a headphone jack is something that matters to you is incredibly stupid", ">>{AH_MLP} : Yes, it's the newest iPhone available so I think it's ridiculous that people buying it don't understand that they are also gonna have to upgrade their other hardware. If you can't afford to upgrade your shit across the board, i.e. getting a Bluetooth adapter for your car, buying new headphones; then you obviously don't need the newest and most expensive smartphone available today. People complaining that the new iPhone isn't compatible with their old headphones or can't charge and listen to music at the same time in their 2005 Honda Accord cause it only has one lighting port aren't the kid of people who need to be buying premium smartphones as soon as they come out.", ">>{hobo_on_oltorf} : I've had my 7+ JB since release date and never once needed to both charge and listen to music... I've never found myself in a situation where both of those were necessary at the same time. If I need to charge it it's the end of the day and I plug it in when I go to bed. If I'm listening to music it's daytime and I'm at work or hanging out. My battery lasts all day. Without fail. Of course, people will always find something to complain about, usually using scenarios that don't exist in the real world. But whatever lol enjoy being bitter about inconsequential things.", ">>{somebodystolemyname} : I'll be honest, I thought it would be a huge issue but the only time I ran into needing to charge it while listening to music was on a road trip for 24 hours straight with it plugged into my aux port.", ">>{CTr1gga} : My 2008 car does not have Bluetooth audio, only an aux port. I work long hours and when I head home on my long commute I want to listen to some music on my phone. But depending on how often I used my phone throughout the day, I also need a charge. It's literally impossible for me to do both now. I love the phone, but ignoring that it is a removed feature and convenience is incredibly ignorant of you. Just because YOU don't need to doesn't mean other people don't. I also have 2016 car that is my weekend car that has all the features so it's a non issue there. But it is not my daily driver. Not everyone can afford newer model cars where this is no longer an issue, so I imagine a lot of people probably have the same issue I do on my daily work commute.", ">>{domeforaklondikebar} : Honestly, its so far from being useful that unless you actually have a disability that would be helped by that setting, it shouldn't be mentioned as an Android LED replacement. I've seen two people use it in public, both times they didn't even notice. It just distracts the people across from you.", '>>{domeforaklondikebar} : Sounds like difference in usage cases. I miss being able to just activate Google Now and just speak a random phrase that it immediately Googles with good contextual actions and information. Id try the search on Siri on my iPad and it would just ask me what I meant by that phrase. Also, my Android phone at the time picked up audio better in an empty room, so YMMV I guess.', '>>{DatDeLorean} : Stereo speakers on a mobile phone are idiotic? Wut.', ">>{DatDeLorean} : I didn't say I agreed with the removal of the headphone port (I don't). I was just pointing out that the guy I was replying to was wrong to state that the iPhone 6S and 7 are pretty much the 'same phone'.", '>>{DatDeLorean} : I did notice that Siri doesn\'t just automatically search the web for things like Google Now / Assistant does, but I don\'t mind that. If I want her to search the web for something I just say "hey Siri, google..." or "hey Siri search duck duck go for...".', ">>{pastelfruits} : Yes it's idiotic. They are millimeters apart it makes no sense. And it's not even real. There's only one speaker at the bottom, the second grille is fake.", ">>{DatDeLorean} : Heh. Only the right grille has a speaker. The second speaker is actually the earpiece at the top of the phone. It's meant for stereo in landscape mode, not vertical. Even if both were on the bottom though, they wouldn't be 'idiotic'. You'd still hear a bit of stereo separation, and you'd still have louder volume than a single speaker.", '>>{EMINEM_4Evah} : Came from a Note 7 to an iPhone 7 Plus So far liking iPhones. Even with the removal of the headphone jack I can live without it in the end.', '>>{Reapka} : Nexus 5 was my last Android phone before switching to iOS for good...', ">>{hobo_on_oltorf} : My car stereo is treated by my phone as a dock. It charges my phone and plays audio at the same time. It's from 2010, which definitely isn't new in any sense. Maybe these people shouldn't be buying brand new phones when they don't even have a car that's from this decade? Just a thought. Priorities eh?", ">>{CTr1gga} : And who exactly are you to tell people that a new car is more important than a new phone? Which is probably the dumbest thing I've ever heard by the way. It's almost like people have more realistic and different priorities than you.", ">>{hobo_on_oltorf} : Lol considering you have both... I dunno why you're complaining. I'm saying if you're spending a thousand dollars on a phone but your car can't even support it, why bother? If your transportation is so old it can't support an iPhone, why are you buying a new iPhone? People are dumb. Why are you being offended on behalf of people that aren't you?", ">>{CTr1gga} : I'm not complaining, I'm speaking for people that most definitely have the same issue as I do on commutes. Expecting people to have a 2016 car instead of a 2016 phone is completely moronic and unrealistic of you. Your fanboyism is incredibly obvious", ">>{hobo_on_oltorf} : I'm not even a fanboy lmao, I don't own a single Mac. I never have. Is everyone that disagrees with you a moron and a fanboy? Why do you have to insult people that don't think the same? You get way too angry about people having a different opinion. It's my opinion that *if* everything you own is too old to support your thousand dollar phone, you should probably get some new stuff before you buy something that you can't use with anything else. That doesn't exactly mean getting a new car, you could just swap out your deck. But whatever, just take a chill pill and calm down man. No need to get so riled up.", ">>{CTr1gga} : I didn't call you a moron. Reading comprehension is not your forte, not worth have a discussion with. Have a good one", '>>{hobo_on_oltorf} : A "discussion?" All you did was sit here and insult me because I disagreed haha. Later man, try being a bit more calm and collected when arguing, it\'ll do you some good.', ">>{TheDonaldNY} : That's what he's saying. He's saying that the Note 2 isn't an accurate representation of Google's voice recognition as it stands today. Compare modern Siri to modern Google Voice Search. Siri is just terrible. And this is coming from someone who loves their iphone.", ">>{DatDeLorean} : Like I said, I upgraded from the Note 2. I owned an S6 Edge, then a BlackBerry Priv... the S6 was a flagship device, I'd say it's fairly representative of most other flagship devices when it comes to Google Now / Assistant performance.", '>>{ithehappy} : Thanks for posting this. I am making the move to it from Pixel, I know I will love the consistency of fluidity but those points did come to my mind, and the camera you find great because you coming from a Nexus 5, otherwise, well.... However, there is no way you can use Google Assistant on iPhone 7? Someone mentioned something like that on a Youtube video I think, probably I was drunk or something.', ">>{TimothyGonzalez} : the camera you find great because you coming from a Nexus 5 Are you saying it's not a good camera? Also are you saying the Nexus 5 camera wasnt good? Aside from absolutely infuriatingly sucking at focussing properly, I loved the Nexus 5. I took some great pics with that phone that look like they were taken with a slr!", ">>{TimothyGonzalez} : Yeah so I made the exact same switch. Don't you get frustrated with Siri?", ">>{ithehappy} : LOL that's good for you mate, that you were able to take shots that good with Nexus 5. Nexus 5's camera was average at best, even at the time of its release, it was never meant to be a good camera phone at first place. iPhone 7's camera is very good, but it simply can't match with the likes of Pixel, S7, G6, or P10 etc.", '>>{tsdguy} : Haha. Yea, every single person. So that translates into EVERY iPhone 7 users has those complaints. Sure.', ">>{tsdguy} : But it's not common. You're projecting your own specific needs on other people and that's not helpful. The population of people that have cars that only have AUX jacks and need to charge while they're driving is I hope you'll admit very low. And you CAN buy an adapter to do just that. So if you think a company can make anything that is perfect for 100% of their customers you're sadly mistaken. There isn't any iPhone 7 users that can't be accommodated either as it is or with the purchase of an inexpensive adapter."], [">>{Dear_Leader_Trump_} : What We Know About The Gunman Who Was Sold On The 'Pizzagate' Conspiracy", '>>{1461DaysInHell} : He was slightly more motivated, but no more delusional that the average donny fan.', '>>{newmexicali} : Can I place a bet he was a bigly contributor on T_D?', '>>{Adnandiditfershure} : >According to a Facebook page that appears to belong to him listed under the name Maddison Welch, he has "liked" both InfoWars and editor Alex Jones I, for one, am shocked, SHOCKED...', ">>{Usawasfun} : We know Trump won't tweet about it, that's for sure.", ">>{notjabba} : The birther president and his army of crazy idiots. If you'll believe one falsehood in the face of evidence, you will believe anything. Welcome to 1984.", '>>{justviewing2} : Trump Terrorist is my phrase for it.', '>>{Bernerberry} : Call him what he is - a terrorist who was inspired by fake propaganda online.', ">>{Sidwill} : Any attorney's here wanna give an over/under on if this guy serves times and how long?", '>>{ResistTrumpAlways} : LOL look at that gun-nut. Not all gun-nuts are bad, some I assume are good people.', ">>{sonofagunn} : If he were Muslim, wouldn't such an article as this mention it? Why not mention he's Christian?", ">>{Grig134} : If he was a Muslim, he'd be dead already and 5 of 25 top stories in /r/all.", '>>{borgosanjacopo} : But don\'t you see? All white people are terrorists or terrorist sympathisers. If these so called "moderate white people" don\'t support this terrorism, why don\'t they publicly apologise on behalf of all white people?!', '>>{altnumber10} : I publicly apologize and disavow him. Christianity is a religion of peace.', '>>{PizzusChrist} : So is this guy the village idiot or just the village?', '>>{pissbum-emeritus} : The propaganda is real, as are the reactions it inspires.', '>>{gonzone} : Some of the comments over there on this fake news story would strongly indicate you win that bet.', '>>{i_am_losing_my_mind} : And there wouldn\'t be so many discussions revolving around his "mental health".', ">>{2fingers} : I'm no attorney, but assuming the article is correct about his previous arrest record, this guy is headed to prison for some serious time.", '>>{Tackbracka} : Without reading I am guessing: Owned multiple MAGA hats. Suscribed to Infowars on Youtube. Denies the last 3 or 4 mass shootings as "false flags" Has a criminal record involving drugs and minors. How much did I have right?', '>>{bracesthrowaway} : Nope. Obama and the Muslims did this with help from left wing occultist pedophiles.', '>>{Rustythepipe} : Hope they finally put him away forever with that sort of history.', '>>{Quenadian} : Real propaganda... False information... If I may...', '>>{gnoani} : > Denies the last 3 or 4 mass shootings as "false flags" > They\'re over there now disregarding this shooting as a false flag, designed to stop their totally legitimate imgur-based investigation.', ">>{enslavedroosters} : Soros had a part to play somewhere also. Can't forget him.", '>>{007meow} : You mean this false flag? ^^/s', '>>{rollerhen} : That was odd about the kid he hit with his car.', '>>{bvcxy} : They usually mention being muslim because its connected to the crime.'], ['>>{ObviousDuh} : Sales of the current pro iPad is so bad they lowered the price by $100 so Mashable thinks they will add these "extras" and charge more? I think their writers have just given up.', ">>{justeducation} : Isn't the iPad line basically all iPad Pros, then what's the point of adding the Pro moniker?", '>>{maybebaked} : iPad mini Pro 9 air XL. Now with only 1 port!', ">>{KimJongSkill492} : They're running out of marketable adjectives and modifiers to add onto the end of their products!", ">>{RichardJasonSavage} : So people who buy it can finally admit they're a pro at something in life.", '>>{person95} : The "pro" is the one with the digitizer and the pencil support. I think they\'ll eventually bring that to all their sizes, and keep "pro" for the largest meanest one they have.', '>>{justeducation} : Pro is now. The generation of iPads being released are all Pros.', '>>{Brostradamus_} : Hold on, let me just grab my Samsung Galaxy S 6 Edge Plus!', ">>{sjchoking} : I'd prefer that Apple kill the Air line and rename the iPad Pro 9.7 to iPad and this reported iPad Mini Pro replace the current mini line. Then rename the iPad Pro 12.9 to iPad Plus. So it would be 3 lines: iPad Mini (7.9) , iPad (9.7) , iPad Plus (12.9).", ">>{Hailtothething} : Yeah, I'm a pro redditor, and pro porn searcher now."]]

classify and reply

[">>{Son0fSun} : Joe Biden to China: Curb North Korea or Japan Can Go Nuclear 'Virtually Overnight'", ">>{redflcn} : Elon Musk's Tesla, SpaceX join legal brief filed by businesses opposed to Trump's immigration order", '>>{Philo1927} : The U.S. spends more on health care than any other country. Here’s what we’re buying.', ">>{greatcaffeine} : Have you considered Apple's leather and silicone cases? Both are pretty minimal while offering good protection, and they obviously don't block any ports.", '>>{COMRADE_DRUMPFOSKY} : After being the only one missing out of ~100 top tech companies. Seriously, Musk is a Trumpist through and through.', ">>{dariusorfeed} : I'd like to point out that at this point healthcare costs are eating up wage increases. https://www.minneapolisfed.org/publications/the-region/where-has-all-the-income-gone Linking healthcare to employment might be the most absurd, stupid thing we've ever done.", '>>{Blubbll} : I heard CAT(erpillar) cases actually protect it.', '>>{LeftMarketAnarchist} : Pharmaceuticals and the healthcare industry are gouging the American tax payer.', '>>{privatenuisance} : My phone only shows 3G network, yet I pay for 4g lte. I just bought a mother phone and as soon as I switched I only had 3G. Is there anything I can do? Carrier is straight talk and this is iPhone 5.', '>>{HollandJim} : I would suggest that you **do not consider** the [Dodocase CARDcase](https://www.dodocase.com/products/leather-iphone-card-case). Bought it directly from them. The leather is wonderful but the plastic case corners on my unit started cracking in all corners and chipping off after less than 3 months. I contacted their support people who said the plastic is NOT covered in the 1-year warranty (and not said anywhere on their site). If I wanted it replaced, I needed to pay 50% of the new price to have it replaced (plus shipping from and back to the Netherlands), which is poor service and absolute crap. So, instead of a working case, they have me posting this story everywhere as a warning about their bad business practices.', '>>{Magjee} : Musk is playing at something What? No one seems to know', '>>{TannerHill} : Make sure LTE is enabled under the cellular tab in your settings. Cellular > Cellular Data Options > Enable LTE (if *Voice and data* is an additional option select that one)', '>>{sanspri} : China to Joe Biden: "Who are you again?"', '>>{thelance} : What model iPhone and what carrier is your straighttalk through?', ">>{arbetman} : Woah, Biden and Trump don't like North Korea? Don't tell me that Trump and Biden both agree on ISIS being a bad thing too!", ">>{JDeppel} : [I like Caudabe's cases.](https://www.caudabe.com/collections/iphone-6s-accessories) Currently using the Veil XT. You'd be hard pressed to find a more minimal case.", '>>{archeominus} : BreitButt, oh how I missed your witty storytelling.', '>>{Chinese-Shill} : Universal health care is pie in the sky. Why would you Americans every think you could do better than what you currently have?', '>>{arbetman} : Yes it said that in the beginning of this article.', '>>{sendingsignal} : i mean, he may be opposed to this and also think he should still try to have more direct access. I think it\'s possible he\'s trying to "think about this logically" and missing a lot of stuff. The Uber CEO did the same thing. They\'re the kind of nerd businessman that is weighing the positives of unpopular decisions and that sometimes causes them to miss the bus on really important social issues.', ">>{spacemoose1} : Linking a profit motive to people's health might be the most absurd, stupid thing we've ever done.", '>>{yourconscienceondrug} : Japan to Joe Biden: "STFU dude, what are you trying to do to us?"', ">>{spacemoose1} : We'll get there. I'd wager that most Republican voters don't understand what's about to happen to them once there is no social security, Medicare and the ACA goes away and premiums double. It'll change things really fast. Good luck with Brexit.", '>>{sanspri} : Joe Biden to Japan: "Set me up with a 14 yo Japanese girl and I\'ll STFU." http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4521296/biden-kiss', '>>{privatenuisance} : I bought it refurbished from a local shop. I believe it was Verizon before I bought it.', ">>{privatenuisance} : I've done that. I even got them to send a new SIM card. Still showing 3G.", '>>{Rapists4Hillary} : But wait when Trump suggested Japan possibly going nuclear he was Hitler. Is Biden Hitler now? Fuck, I liked Biden.', ">>{rfow} : Isn't Straight Talk based off AT&Ts network? Perhaps the CDMA bands don't accommodate for the LTE on a GSM network.", ">>{privatenuisance} : But I'm sure the phone was unlocked. I think.", '>>{BalanceCoil} : I thought you could use a reminder based on your comment.', ">>{Magjee} : I don't like trump, but the opportunity to advise the President is valuable   EX: donny, we can't use gas forever, it runs out. That is why we are building cars that don't use gas. If funding is cut for green cars, china will take the lead Stuff like that", ">>{interludes} : I've had a society6 case for every iPhone I've had since the 4s and have had no screen shatters or dents in 6 years of using them. They're actually Case-Mate cases. I just bought a tough case for my 7. It doesn't make the phone feel too much heavier or wider, which is nice. It did take a little bit of finagling to get the outer shell to fit properly over the inner bumper, but once I got it on it fit fine and stayed in place. The bumper definitely creates enough of a lip that the front screen will never touch the table if you place it face down, and the camera is protected too. The only downside is that I've only had it on for two days and I can already see the back has gotten scratched up because the shell is a shiny finish, not matte. I got a mostly black design so I think it'll be fine, but I'd take that into consideration if you want to get something more ornate - it might get kind of scratched off eventually. With my old phones I had the slim cases and never had any issue with the headphone jack. No clue how the tough case is with headphones since my 7 doesn't have the traditional jack, but the charging port and volume switch are both easily accessible if that tells you anything.", ">>{arbetman} : Yes I really needed a reminder that not liking North Korea while trying to make China do it's shit while not taking USA to another pointless war is a bipartisan issue.", ">>{rfow} : Irrelevant to this situation unfortunately. While the decide may work if any SIM card is inserted, it's still a device that is configured truly for a CDMA network, meaning a GSM network would have some drawbacks.", ">>{TannerHill} : There's your issue. The Verizon version doesn't support LTE Band's 4 or 17(12) which are what AT&T (straight talk) use. Your phone will forever be stuck on Edge and 3G (HSPA+) while on GSM networks. (T-Mobile uses those same LTE bands (plus Band 2)) so moving to another sub carrier like metroPCS wouldn't solve it.", '>>{rouyal} : This. Im on my first iphone (6s), got the saddle color leather case, and love it.', ">>{sendingsignal} : yeah, I mean it makes sense on a level to me as well. But that's assuming he will actually listen to any advice. I'm not really sure he will anymore. I think he has longer established friendships (and this seems to matter more to him than any facts or even greed or self preservation) with old money, shitty republican lobbyist types etc. I think, honestly, that he's going to fuck things up and need to be removed and Musk would be best served by joining the resistance or just pulling out and focusing on sending people to space. Of course now, that may be a bad move if he's worried trump will try to regulate his space efforts. I would say it seems insane to worry that a republican president would regulate that but.. this guy is crazy so", ">>{Foxhound199} : Doesn't seem contradictory to me to be vehemently opposed on this issue, yet hopeful he can influence the administration in issues relating to jobs, energy, and space exploration.", '>>{HindleMcCrindleberry} : Unfortunately, those are the only two options we have for at least the next four years.', ">>{chewb} : just write the exact model number of your iphone here and you'll get this answered", ">>{parth0295} : Shockingly, Best Buy's insignia case is fantastic. It's made from a flexible you material, really shock resistant and as a person who was really into skins, I'm impressed by just how thin this case is while still being protective. http://www.bestbuy.com/site/insignia-soft-shell-case-for-apple-iphone-6s-black/8451331.p?skuId=8451331&ref=212&loc=1&ksid=9de0f55f-3e92-4390-9d0f-2621b6a66611&ksprof_id=3&ksaffcode=pg218886&ksdevice=m&lsft=ref:212,loc:2&gclid=CK2MxNDl2NECFQhYDQodjmYPLw", '>>{MAGwastheSHIT} : No, he does not. >“It’s okay with Donald Trump. But it’s not okay for us to continue to see the proliferation of nuclear weapons around the world," http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/06/24/national/politics-diplomacy/japan-get-nuclear-weapons-virtually-overnight-biden-tells-xi/#.V26mvnopDqB', '>>{ecs0013} : ^^^^ This x1000. The iPhone 5 was the last for awhile where LTE capabilities were not equal across most devices. With each new model, the iPhones supported more LTE bands on fewer different models and the 6s/6s Plus was the "universal" model. Unfortunately, no configuration changes, software updates, or anything else will help. It\'s like if you wanted to listen to an FM radio station and your radio only has an AM tuner. You\'ll either need to switch to the Verizon-backed Straight Talk plan (if I remember correctly, they offer service backed by all the major carriers), or switch to Verizon proper (prepaid or postpaid) if you want to use that phone to its fullest.', '>>{parth0295} : I had the caudabe veil before this and still prefer this as the grip is substantially better while still remaining thin', '>>{MAGwastheSHIT} : Biden warned China that their failure to control North Korea could lead to nuclear proliferation, which nobody in their right mind wants (note: this group does not include Trump). Biden is correct. Japan is a paranuclear state that could easily develop nukes if they so chose.', ">>{9548736} : I'd reccomend the Native Union Clic 360. Does leave the bottom open so no port issues. I'm talking about the waxed canvas version btw. Rubber 3D shock absorption inside and outside is a grippy material with part of the back covered in waxed british canvas. Looks great, had some short drops with it on and no issues.", '>>{contactlite} : > After being the only one missing out of ~100 top tech companies. He won the popular vote, tho', ">>{xbit1} : I mean you also have to remember that the United States is a massive country, third largest in the world in terms of population. Establishing a single payer health care system in huge countries like China, India, and the US isn't the same as doing it in the UK or a tiny country European country. With Obamacare, the fact is that most people are now paying more for health insurance, but more people have it. It's an individual vs. the community thing. You also have to remember there's some pretty significant cultural differences between the US and Europe that effect healthcare preferences. Americans don't like taxes, and don't like big government. There's definitely drawbacks to Obamacare, and definitely benefits. But just because of the sheer size of the US and the way government is organized, I can't see a single payer system working efficiently.", ">>{PM_ME_DICK_PICTURES} : Doesn't matter if your phone doesn't support the hardware to get on LTE.", '>>{jsharr2} : Got my dad a really nice leather one from The Nodus Collection for Christmas. Comes with a super strong, small magnet you can mount anywhere (your car for pizza delivery). The case attaches to it and is very secure. The case itself is almost identical to the OEM Apple leather cases. [Nodus Collection](https://noduscollection.com/collections/for-iphone/products/the-shell-case-for-iphone?variant=5011936260)', '>>{MAGwastheSHIT} : You claimed Biden agreed with Trump that Japan should develop its own nukes. Biden directly refuted that.', ">>{apexidiot} : There's been plenty of reports that Donny is most influenced by the last guy he talked to. Honestly, if I had a chance to turn things in my favor by being the last guy he talked to I would be there. I don't like Trump, but it's not dumb to choose your battles when you're in a position like Musk's. Especially since Musk has his own sort of cult following. He's in a unique position and he should do what he can.", '>>{BalanceCoil} : You misunderstood what Trump said there is the problem go back and look though what he said.', ">>{MAGwastheSHIT} : Oh, I understood it perfectly (or at least as perfectly as anyone can decipher Trump's cryptic, inarticulate, word salad answers). Here's the complete transcript: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/03/27/us/politics/donald-trump-transcript.html Trump is okay with overturning 70 years of bipartisan commitment to nuclear non-proliferation, because he's ignorant and reckless. Biden is not.", ">>{dekanger} : Before the election, Musk's businesses were already in the crosshairs of some of the Republican hate machine. Tesla and SpaceX depend on government cooperation, and would be in huge trouble if the government actively turned on them. When the secretary of state is the CEO of Exxon Mobile, and one of your chief products puts oil companies out of business, then you tread very carefully.", '>>{916hotdogs} : [When everyone is Hitler, is anyone really Hitler?](http://i.imgur.com/uawlvGA.gifv)', '>>{916hotdogs} : Biden is the dad pushing his kid to go punch the bully in the mouth even though his kid would rather be jerking off to anime.', ">>{Ozzzymandias} : I don't think he's a Trumpist. I think he gives no shits about politics and thinks his goal of getting to Mars is more important than the quality of life for millions of people on earth.", '>>{dariusorfeed} : I mean, the system can be scaled up, this is kind of a myth you see from conservatives. The only reason we don\'t have single payer is the red scare and insurance companies, you should read the history of healthcare in this country. http://www.pnhp.org/facts/a-brief-history-universal-health-care-efforts-in-the-us Btw, I\'m pretty sure India has free healthcare for a lot of people and China offers cheap subsidized health insurance as well. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851015001864 >> China successfully achieved universal health insurance coverage in 2011, representing the largest expansion of insurance coverage in human history. While the achievement is widely recognized, it is still largely unexplored why China was able to attain it within a short period. This study aims to fill the gap. Through a systematic political and socio-economic analysis, it identifies seven major drivers for China\'s success, including (1) the SARS outbreak as a wake-up call, (2) strong public support for government intervention in health care, (3) renewed political commitment from top leaders, (4) heavy government subsidies, (5) fiscal capacity backed by China\'s economic power, (6) financial and political responsibilities delegated to local governments and (7) programmatic implementation strategy. Three of the factors seem to be unique to China (i.e., the SARS outbreak, the delegation, and the programmatic strategy.) while the other factors are commonly found in other countries’ insurance expansion experiences. This study also discusses challenges and recommendations for China\'s health financing, such as reducing financial risk as an immediate task, equalizing benefit across insurance programs as a long-term goal, improving quality by tying provider payment to performance, and controlling costs through coordinated reform initiatives. Finally, it draws lessons for other developing countries. The "America is just too big" excuse just doesn\'t work anymore, it had a good run, conservatives used it for a solid 40+ years. But we\'re going to get embarrassed by India/China in the coming years.', ">>{josourcing} : > There's been plenty of reports that Donny is most influenced by the last guy he talked to. That's friggin' hilarious. (And I think I believe it.)", '>>{clone822} : Smaller negotiators have bigger leverage somehow? Even if that were true, our insurance costs reflect the cost of care, which is wild. An MRI costs 1100 dollars in the US, about 280 in France, and 100 in Japan.', '>>{HindleMcCrindleberry} : The reality of current situation is that Republicans hold majorities in all three branches of government which makes it literally impossible to even try to push a major liberal policy like universal healthcare. The absolute best we can do in the immediate future is try to mitigate our losses. It sucks... The last time the Republicans yielded this much power was in the late 1920s and it led to the Great Depression.', ">>{MAGwastheSHIT} : I'm well aware that Trump tries to walk back the dumb things he says. That doesn't mean he didn't say them in the first place.", '>>{redflcn} : I think a lot of people who were in his advisory team learned this the hard way...', ">>{clone822} : I think we agree that bigger pools have more leverage and fetch lower premiums. But i disgree that breaking these pools up has a positive effect. If there were no unions, businesses wouldnt bestow better pay out of the kindess if their hearts. No profit, no consequence/regulation, it doesn't happen.", '>>{ufmystic} : Elon Musk is a fucking boss! He\'s like, "POTUS I\'m coming to your meeting...throw out your agenda. Oh, I\'m gonna sue you tomorrow and there better be a vegetarian option at your next meeting too. I\'ll call you from my space shuttle."', ">>{redflcn} : BOYCOTT TESLA - Trump's twitter account... probably", '>>{BalanceCoil} : So you would rather rely on a narrow interpretation of what he said the first time rather than the clarification. Manufactured outrage is boring.', '>>{South_in_AZ} : The thing is, may republicans support the ACA. The problem they have is with Obamacare. Them being different names for the same thing is not something they are aware of.', ">>{jcw4455} : “If Japan had that nuclear threat, I’m not sure that would be a bad thing for us.” -Trump Trump was saying it was a good idea. Biden is warning about the possibility. Politics and language is a nuanced thing. Just because many of the same words are in a sentence, doesnt mean both sentences are the same. PM me and I'll tell you more.", ">>{South_in_AZ} : That is similar to saying Walmart can't be competitive with small chains because it is so big.", ">>{MenicusMoldbug} : The people in government are responsible for 2/3rds of the healthcare spending and heavily control the rest. That's why it's so fucked up. Every sector they touch turns to shit.", ">>{HindleMcCrindleberry} : I don't disagree with any of that... At least in theory. The reality of the situation is a lot darker than you realize, I'm afraid. Sorry, but it's really hard not to super fucking pessimistic right now.", '>>{MAGwastheSHIT} : That "clarification" you posted was just as thoughtless, clumsy, and ill-informed as the original interviews. >"Unfortunately, we have a nuclear world now," he said. "Would I rather have North Korea have [nuclear weapons] with Japan sitting there having them also? You may very well be better off if that\'s the case." >"You have so many countries already — China, Pakistan, you have so many countries, Russia — you have so many countries right now that have them," Trump said. "Now, wouldn\'t you rather, in a certain sense, have Japan have nuclear weapons when North Korea has nuclear weapons?" No, Donald. No, we would not.', '>>{MenicusMoldbug} : Liberal: "See the VA, Republican Without Healthcare? That\'s what we can offer you if you let us give you an NHS-like system! " Republican: "Remember how all those vets died so the people at the VA could get those greedy money bonuses?" Liberal: "Yes" Republican: "Did anyone get fired for killing vets so they could get those greedy money bonuses?" Liberal: "No" Republican:"Did they still get those bonuses after it was found out vets died so they could get them?" Liberal: "Yes" Republican:"So the people in government in charge of healthcare for vets literally killed vets for bonuses, didn\'t get fired and still got those bonuses?" Liberal: "Yes" Republican:"And you want them to control all of our healthcare?" Liberal: "Yes" Republican:"..."', '>>{HindleMcCrindleberry} : I agree with that with the exception of the nuclear football (which is the "briefcase" that launches our nukes). There is no oversight of that, nobody that has to be consulted, and nobody that can stop it once the button gets pushed. I don\'t think he would use it, but it definitely makes me uneasy that he alone has control of it.', '>>{kiramis} : Yeah, but at first I thought they were just quoting Hillary.', '>>{KawaiiPatrick} : Biden suggesting the same thing as Trump? Is Biden now the NEW Hitler?', '>>{myniecetorpel} : When comparing to other major industrialized/post-industrial countries, the US actually has the lowest level of government payment for healthcare services by far. Yet we also have the highest cost. The government is much more involved in health care in almost every other industrialized country, but we have the highest costs and the lowest coverage.', ">>{MenicusMoldbug} : > When comparing to other major industrialized/post-industrial countries, the US actually has the lowest level of government payment for healthcare services by far. Yet we also have the highest cost. That's not true. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.PCAP?year_high_desc=true Per Capita, the US is the 3rd highest public spender. >The government is much more involved in health care in almost every other industrialized country, but we have the highest costs and the lowest coverage. That's not true either. http://www.forbes.com/sites/chrisconover/2012/08/07/takeover-government-on-track-to-make-up-66-of-healthcare-spending-obamacare/#25dcfd9c603b 66% is mid range of what other countries control.", ">>{myniecetorpel} : I read your response, you're absolutely accurate in refuting what I said. I'm on mobile and I wrote super sloppily and was very imprecise. When I get back to my desktop, I'll respond to this.", '>>{Anonymocoso} : Your health care is not free. It is paid for by tax rates that almost no US voters would accept.', '>>{Anonymocoso} : Americans are very fat and like to shoot each other. If we put down the Oreos and the Glocks, we would pay less for health care. Our teens like to have babies at the highest rate in the industrialized world. Yay, abstinence - only sex education. Teens having babies also causes higher health care costs.', '>>{Anonymocoso} : [Wage and price controls caused an increase in employer-provided health care.](http://www.nber.org/bah/2009no2/w14839.html)']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{redflcn} : Elon Musk's Tesla, SpaceX join legal brief filed by businesses opposed to Trump's immigration order", '>>{COMRADE_DRUMPFOSKY} : After being the only one missing out of ~100 top tech companies. Seriously, Musk is a Trumpist through and through.', '>>{Magjee} : Musk is playing at something What? No one seems to know', '>>{sendingsignal} : i mean, he may be opposed to this and also think he should still try to have more direct access. I think it\'s possible he\'s trying to "think about this logically" and missing a lot of stuff. The Uber CEO did the same thing. They\'re the kind of nerd businessman that is weighing the positives of unpopular decisions and that sometimes causes them to miss the bus on really important social issues.', ">>{Magjee} : I don't like trump, but the opportunity to advise the President is valuable   EX: donny, we can't use gas forever, it runs out. That is why we are building cars that don't use gas. If funding is cut for green cars, china will take the lead Stuff like that", ">>{sendingsignal} : yeah, I mean it makes sense on a level to me as well. But that's assuming he will actually listen to any advice. I'm not really sure he will anymore. I think he has longer established friendships (and this seems to matter more to him than any facts or even greed or self preservation) with old money, shitty republican lobbyist types etc. I think, honestly, that he's going to fuck things up and need to be removed and Musk would be best served by joining the resistance or just pulling out and focusing on sending people to space. Of course now, that may be a bad move if he's worried trump will try to regulate his space efforts. I would say it seems insane to worry that a republican president would regulate that but.. this guy is crazy so", ">>{Foxhound199} : Doesn't seem contradictory to me to be vehemently opposed on this issue, yet hopeful he can influence the administration in issues relating to jobs, energy, and space exploration.", '>>{contactlite} : > After being the only one missing out of ~100 top tech companies. He won the popular vote, tho', ">>{apexidiot} : There's been plenty of reports that Donny is most influenced by the last guy he talked to. Honestly, if I had a chance to turn things in my favor by being the last guy he talked to I would be there. I don't like Trump, but it's not dumb to choose your battles when you're in a position like Musk's. Especially since Musk has his own sort of cult following. He's in a unique position and he should do what he can.", ">>{dekanger} : Before the election, Musk's businesses were already in the crosshairs of some of the Republican hate machine. Tesla and SpaceX depend on government cooperation, and would be in huge trouble if the government actively turned on them. When the secretary of state is the CEO of Exxon Mobile, and one of your chief products puts oil companies out of business, then you tread very carefully.", ">>{Ozzzymandias} : I don't think he's a Trumpist. I think he gives no shits about politics and thinks his goal of getting to Mars is more important than the quality of life for millions of people on earth.", ">>{josourcing} : > There's been plenty of reports that Donny is most influenced by the last guy he talked to. That's friggin' hilarious. (And I think I believe it.)", '>>{redflcn} : I think a lot of people who were in his advisory team learned this the hard way...', '>>{ufmystic} : Elon Musk is a fucking boss! He\'s like, "POTUS I\'m coming to your meeting...throw out your agenda. Oh, I\'m gonna sue you tomorrow and there better be a vegetarian option at your next meeting too. I\'ll call you from my space shuttle."', ">>{redflcn} : BOYCOTT TESLA - Trump's twitter account... probably"], [">>{greatcaffeine} : Have you considered Apple's leather and silicone cases? Both are pretty minimal while offering good protection, and they obviously don't block any ports.", '>>{Blubbll} : I heard CAT(erpillar) cases actually protect it.', '>>{HollandJim} : I would suggest that you **do not consider** the [Dodocase CARDcase](https://www.dodocase.com/products/leather-iphone-card-case). Bought it directly from them. The leather is wonderful but the plastic case corners on my unit started cracking in all corners and chipping off after less than 3 months. I contacted their support people who said the plastic is NOT covered in the 1-year warranty (and not said anywhere on their site). If I wanted it replaced, I needed to pay 50% of the new price to have it replaced (plus shipping from and back to the Netherlands), which is poor service and absolute crap. So, instead of a working case, they have me posting this story everywhere as a warning about their bad business practices.', ">>{JDeppel} : [I like Caudabe's cases.](https://www.caudabe.com/collections/iphone-6s-accessories) Currently using the Veil XT. You'd be hard pressed to find a more minimal case.", ">>{interludes} : I've had a society6 case for every iPhone I've had since the 4s and have had no screen shatters or dents in 6 years of using them. They're actually Case-Mate cases. I just bought a tough case for my 7. It doesn't make the phone feel too much heavier or wider, which is nice. It did take a little bit of finagling to get the outer shell to fit properly over the inner bumper, but once I got it on it fit fine and stayed in place. The bumper definitely creates enough of a lip that the front screen will never touch the table if you place it face down, and the camera is protected too. The only downside is that I've only had it on for two days and I can already see the back has gotten scratched up because the shell is a shiny finish, not matte. I got a mostly black design so I think it'll be fine, but I'd take that into consideration if you want to get something more ornate - it might get kind of scratched off eventually. With my old phones I had the slim cases and never had any issue with the headphone jack. No clue how the tough case is with headphones since my 7 doesn't have the traditional jack, but the charging port and volume switch are both easily accessible if that tells you anything.", '>>{rouyal} : This. Im on my first iphone (6s), got the saddle color leather case, and love it.', ">>{parth0295} : Shockingly, Best Buy's insignia case is fantastic. It's made from a flexible you material, really shock resistant and as a person who was really into skins, I'm impressed by just how thin this case is while still being protective. http://www.bestbuy.com/site/insignia-soft-shell-case-for-apple-iphone-6s-black/8451331.p?skuId=8451331&ref=212&loc=1&ksid=9de0f55f-3e92-4390-9d0f-2621b6a66611&ksprof_id=3&ksaffcode=pg218886&ksdevice=m&lsft=ref:212,loc:2&gclid=CK2MxNDl2NECFQhYDQodjmYPLw", '>>{parth0295} : I had the caudabe veil before this and still prefer this as the grip is substantially better while still remaining thin', ">>{9548736} : I'd reccomend the Native Union Clic 360. Does leave the bottom open so no port issues. I'm talking about the waxed canvas version btw. Rubber 3D shock absorption inside and outside is a grippy material with part of the back covered in waxed british canvas. Looks great, had some short drops with it on and no issues.", '>>{jsharr2} : Got my dad a really nice leather one from The Nodus Collection for Christmas. Comes with a super strong, small magnet you can mount anywhere (your car for pizza delivery). The case attaches to it and is very secure. The case itself is almost identical to the OEM Apple leather cases. [Nodus Collection](https://noduscollection.com/collections/for-iphone/products/the-shell-case-for-iphone?variant=5011936260)'], ['>>{Philo1927} : The U.S. spends more on health care than any other country. Here’s what we’re buying.', ">>{dariusorfeed} : I'd like to point out that at this point healthcare costs are eating up wage increases. https://www.minneapolisfed.org/publications/the-region/where-has-all-the-income-gone Linking healthcare to employment might be the most absurd, stupid thing we've ever done.", '>>{LeftMarketAnarchist} : Pharmaceuticals and the healthcare industry are gouging the American tax payer.', '>>{Chinese-Shill} : Universal health care is pie in the sky. Why would you Americans every think you could do better than what you currently have?', ">>{spacemoose1} : Linking a profit motive to people's health might be the most absurd, stupid thing we've ever done.", ">>{spacemoose1} : We'll get there. I'd wager that most Republican voters don't understand what's about to happen to them once there is no social security, Medicare and the ACA goes away and premiums double. It'll change things really fast. Good luck with Brexit.", '>>{HindleMcCrindleberry} : Unfortunately, those are the only two options we have for at least the next four years.', ">>{xbit1} : I mean you also have to remember that the United States is a massive country, third largest in the world in terms of population. Establishing a single payer health care system in huge countries like China, India, and the US isn't the same as doing it in the UK or a tiny country European country. With Obamacare, the fact is that most people are now paying more for health insurance, but more people have it. It's an individual vs. the community thing. You also have to remember there's some pretty significant cultural differences between the US and Europe that effect healthcare preferences. Americans don't like taxes, and don't like big government. There's definitely drawbacks to Obamacare, and definitely benefits. But just because of the sheer size of the US and the way government is organized, I can't see a single payer system working efficiently.", '>>{dariusorfeed} : I mean, the system can be scaled up, this is kind of a myth you see from conservatives. The only reason we don\'t have single payer is the red scare and insurance companies, you should read the history of healthcare in this country. http://www.pnhp.org/facts/a-brief-history-universal-health-care-efforts-in-the-us Btw, I\'m pretty sure India has free healthcare for a lot of people and China offers cheap subsidized health insurance as well. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851015001864 >> China successfully achieved universal health insurance coverage in 2011, representing the largest expansion of insurance coverage in human history. While the achievement is widely recognized, it is still largely unexplored why China was able to attain it within a short period. This study aims to fill the gap. Through a systematic political and socio-economic analysis, it identifies seven major drivers for China\'s success, including (1) the SARS outbreak as a wake-up call, (2) strong public support for government intervention in health care, (3) renewed political commitment from top leaders, (4) heavy government subsidies, (5) fiscal capacity backed by China\'s economic power, (6) financial and political responsibilities delegated to local governments and (7) programmatic implementation strategy. Three of the factors seem to be unique to China (i.e., the SARS outbreak, the delegation, and the programmatic strategy.) while the other factors are commonly found in other countries’ insurance expansion experiences. This study also discusses challenges and recommendations for China\'s health financing, such as reducing financial risk as an immediate task, equalizing benefit across insurance programs as a long-term goal, improving quality by tying provider payment to performance, and controlling costs through coordinated reform initiatives. Finally, it draws lessons for other developing countries. The "America is just too big" excuse just doesn\'t work anymore, it had a good run, conservatives used it for a solid 40+ years. But we\'re going to get embarrassed by India/China in the coming years.', '>>{clone822} : Smaller negotiators have bigger leverage somehow? Even if that were true, our insurance costs reflect the cost of care, which is wild. An MRI costs 1100 dollars in the US, about 280 in France, and 100 in Japan.', '>>{HindleMcCrindleberry} : The reality of current situation is that Republicans hold majorities in all three branches of government which makes it literally impossible to even try to push a major liberal policy like universal healthcare. The absolute best we can do in the immediate future is try to mitigate our losses. It sucks... The last time the Republicans yielded this much power was in the late 1920s and it led to the Great Depression.', ">>{clone822} : I think we agree that bigger pools have more leverage and fetch lower premiums. But i disgree that breaking these pools up has a positive effect. If there were no unions, businesses wouldnt bestow better pay out of the kindess if their hearts. No profit, no consequence/regulation, it doesn't happen.", '>>{South_in_AZ} : The thing is, may republicans support the ACA. The problem they have is with Obamacare. Them being different names for the same thing is not something they are aware of.', ">>{South_in_AZ} : That is similar to saying Walmart can't be competitive with small chains because it is so big.", ">>{MenicusMoldbug} : The people in government are responsible for 2/3rds of the healthcare spending and heavily control the rest. That's why it's so fucked up. Every sector they touch turns to shit.", ">>{HindleMcCrindleberry} : I don't disagree with any of that... At least in theory. The reality of the situation is a lot darker than you realize, I'm afraid. Sorry, but it's really hard not to super fucking pessimistic right now.", '>>{MenicusMoldbug} : Liberal: "See the VA, Republican Without Healthcare? That\'s what we can offer you if you let us give you an NHS-like system! " Republican: "Remember how all those vets died so the people at the VA could get those greedy money bonuses?" Liberal: "Yes" Republican: "Did anyone get fired for killing vets so they could get those greedy money bonuses?" Liberal: "No" Republican:"Did they still get those bonuses after it was found out vets died so they could get them?" Liberal: "Yes" Republican:"So the people in government in charge of healthcare for vets literally killed vets for bonuses, didn\'t get fired and still got those bonuses?" Liberal: "Yes" Republican:"And you want them to control all of our healthcare?" Liberal: "Yes" Republican:"..."', '>>{HindleMcCrindleberry} : I agree with that with the exception of the nuclear football (which is the "briefcase" that launches our nukes). There is no oversight of that, nobody that has to be consulted, and nobody that can stop it once the button gets pushed. I don\'t think he would use it, but it definitely makes me uneasy that he alone has control of it.', '>>{kiramis} : Yeah, but at first I thought they were just quoting Hillary.', '>>{myniecetorpel} : When comparing to other major industrialized/post-industrial countries, the US actually has the lowest level of government payment for healthcare services by far. Yet we also have the highest cost. The government is much more involved in health care in almost every other industrialized country, but we have the highest costs and the lowest coverage.', ">>{MenicusMoldbug} : > When comparing to other major industrialized/post-industrial countries, the US actually has the lowest level of government payment for healthcare services by far. Yet we also have the highest cost. That's not true. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.PCAP?year_high_desc=true Per Capita, the US is the 3rd highest public spender. >The government is much more involved in health care in almost every other industrialized country, but we have the highest costs and the lowest coverage. That's not true either. http://www.forbes.com/sites/chrisconover/2012/08/07/takeover-government-on-track-to-make-up-66-of-healthcare-spending-obamacare/#25dcfd9c603b 66% is mid range of what other countries control.", ">>{myniecetorpel} : I read your response, you're absolutely accurate in refuting what I said. I'm on mobile and I wrote super sloppily and was very imprecise. When I get back to my desktop, I'll respond to this.", '>>{Anonymocoso} : Your health care is not free. It is paid for by tax rates that almost no US voters would accept.', '>>{Anonymocoso} : Americans are very fat and like to shoot each other. If we put down the Oreos and the Glocks, we would pay less for health care. Our teens like to have babies at the highest rate in the industrialized world. Yay, abstinence - only sex education. Teens having babies also causes higher health care costs.', '>>{Anonymocoso} : [Wage and price controls caused an increase in employer-provided health care.](http://www.nber.org/bah/2009no2/w14839.html)'], [">>{Son0fSun} : Joe Biden to China: Curb North Korea or Japan Can Go Nuclear 'Virtually Overnight'", '>>{sanspri} : China to Joe Biden: "Who are you again?"', ">>{arbetman} : Woah, Biden and Trump don't like North Korea? Don't tell me that Trump and Biden both agree on ISIS being a bad thing too!", '>>{archeominus} : BreitButt, oh how I missed your witty storytelling.', '>>{arbetman} : Yes it said that in the beginning of this article.', '>>{yourconscienceondrug} : Japan to Joe Biden: "STFU dude, what are you trying to do to us?"', '>>{sanspri} : Joe Biden to Japan: "Set me up with a 14 yo Japanese girl and I\'ll STFU." http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4521296/biden-kiss', '>>{Rapists4Hillary} : But wait when Trump suggested Japan possibly going nuclear he was Hitler. Is Biden Hitler now? Fuck, I liked Biden.', '>>{BalanceCoil} : I thought you could use a reminder based on your comment.', ">>{arbetman} : Yes I really needed a reminder that not liking North Korea while trying to make China do it's shit while not taking USA to another pointless war is a bipartisan issue.", '>>{MAGwastheSHIT} : No, he does not. >“It’s okay with Donald Trump. But it’s not okay for us to continue to see the proliferation of nuclear weapons around the world," http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/06/24/national/politics-diplomacy/japan-get-nuclear-weapons-virtually-overnight-biden-tells-xi/#.V26mvnopDqB', '>>{MAGwastheSHIT} : Biden warned China that their failure to control North Korea could lead to nuclear proliferation, which nobody in their right mind wants (note: this group does not include Trump). Biden is correct. Japan is a paranuclear state that could easily develop nukes if they so chose.', '>>{MAGwastheSHIT} : You claimed Biden agreed with Trump that Japan should develop its own nukes. Biden directly refuted that.', '>>{BalanceCoil} : You misunderstood what Trump said there is the problem go back and look though what he said.', ">>{MAGwastheSHIT} : Oh, I understood it perfectly (or at least as perfectly as anyone can decipher Trump's cryptic, inarticulate, word salad answers). Here's the complete transcript: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/03/27/us/politics/donald-trump-transcript.html Trump is okay with overturning 70 years of bipartisan commitment to nuclear non-proliferation, because he's ignorant and reckless. Biden is not.", '>>{916hotdogs} : [When everyone is Hitler, is anyone really Hitler?](http://i.imgur.com/uawlvGA.gifv)', '>>{916hotdogs} : Biden is the dad pushing his kid to go punch the bully in the mouth even though his kid would rather be jerking off to anime.', ">>{MAGwastheSHIT} : I'm well aware that Trump tries to walk back the dumb things he says. That doesn't mean he didn't say them in the first place.", '>>{BalanceCoil} : So you would rather rely on a narrow interpretation of what he said the first time rather than the clarification. Manufactured outrage is boring.', ">>{jcw4455} : “If Japan had that nuclear threat, I’m not sure that would be a bad thing for us.” -Trump Trump was saying it was a good idea. Biden is warning about the possibility. Politics and language is a nuanced thing. Just because many of the same words are in a sentence, doesnt mean both sentences are the same. PM me and I'll tell you more.", '>>{MAGwastheSHIT} : That "clarification" you posted was just as thoughtless, clumsy, and ill-informed as the original interviews. >"Unfortunately, we have a nuclear world now," he said. "Would I rather have North Korea have [nuclear weapons] with Japan sitting there having them also? You may very well be better off if that\'s the case." >"You have so many countries already — China, Pakistan, you have so many countries, Russia — you have so many countries right now that have them," Trump said. "Now, wouldn\'t you rather, in a certain sense, have Japan have nuclear weapons when North Korea has nuclear weapons?" No, Donald. No, we would not.', '>>{KawaiiPatrick} : Biden suggesting the same thing as Trump? Is Biden now the NEW Hitler?'], ['>>{privatenuisance} : My phone only shows 3G network, yet I pay for 4g lte. I just bought a mother phone and as soon as I switched I only had 3G. Is there anything I can do? Carrier is straight talk and this is iPhone 5.', '>>{TannerHill} : Make sure LTE is enabled under the cellular tab in your settings. Cellular > Cellular Data Options > Enable LTE (if *Voice and data* is an additional option select that one)', '>>{thelance} : What model iPhone and what carrier is your straighttalk through?', '>>{privatenuisance} : I bought it refurbished from a local shop. I believe it was Verizon before I bought it.', ">>{privatenuisance} : I've done that. I even got them to send a new SIM card. Still showing 3G.", ">>{rfow} : Isn't Straight Talk based off AT&Ts network? Perhaps the CDMA bands don't accommodate for the LTE on a GSM network.", ">>{privatenuisance} : But I'm sure the phone was unlocked. I think.", ">>{rfow} : Irrelevant to this situation unfortunately. While the decide may work if any SIM card is inserted, it's still a device that is configured truly for a CDMA network, meaning a GSM network would have some drawbacks.", ">>{TannerHill} : There's your issue. The Verizon version doesn't support LTE Band's 4 or 17(12) which are what AT&T (straight talk) use. Your phone will forever be stuck on Edge and 3G (HSPA+) while on GSM networks. (T-Mobile uses those same LTE bands (plus Band 2)) so moving to another sub carrier like metroPCS wouldn't solve it.", ">>{chewb} : just write the exact model number of your iphone here and you'll get this answered", '>>{ecs0013} : ^^^^ This x1000. The iPhone 5 was the last for awhile where LTE capabilities were not equal across most devices. With each new model, the iPhones supported more LTE bands on fewer different models and the 6s/6s Plus was the "universal" model. Unfortunately, no configuration changes, software updates, or anything else will help. It\'s like if you wanted to listen to an FM radio station and your radio only has an AM tuner. You\'ll either need to switch to the Verizon-backed Straight Talk plan (if I remember correctly, they offer service backed by all the major carriers), or switch to Verizon proper (prepaid or postpaid) if you want to use that phone to its fullest.', ">>{PM_ME_DICK_PICTURES} : Doesn't matter if your phone doesn't support the hardware to get on LTE."]]

classify and reply

['>>{dy0nisus} : Donald Trump’s budget director’s Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bill would socialize risk and privatize profit', ">>{SilverMt} : We've been down this road before. This leads to more wealth for the rich at the front end and again when the boom turns to a bust. The rest of us will lose when the economy tanks yet again.", ">>{South_in_AZ} : So, nothing new. Business as usual. Same 'ol swap. Thanks Trump", ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : > Donald Trump’s budget director’s Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bill would socialize risk and privatize profit Same 'ol, same 'ol.", '>>{b0ltzmann138e-23} : But I was told that there would trickle down economics', '>>{MostlyCarbonite} : A flood at the top and a drop at the bottom.', '>>{bonerknocker} : Ahh, well, this has always been the scam people. Try to exploit the situation, get high on hopium of change, or blissfully ignore the situation and die poor.', '>>{SeenItAllHeardItAll} : Is this really business as usual or is this major story considering the huge amount of money involved? > When combined with the price of the prohibition on charging the backstop, the total cost of Mulvaney’s bill will equal roughly $405 billion. The beneficiaries would be investors in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.', ">>{LesterPearsonsProjct} : Isn't that almost how Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were designed to work?", '>>{frobro989} : Fannie and Freddie are one of the only reasons people can buy houses. They literally have one source of revenue. This is a sensationalist article that makes incorrect assumptions.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{dy0nisus} : Donald Trump’s budget director’s Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bill would socialize risk and privatize profit', ">>{SilverMt} : We've been down this road before. This leads to more wealth for the rich at the front end and again when the boom turns to a bust. The rest of us will lose when the economy tanks yet again.", ">>{South_in_AZ} : So, nothing new. Business as usual. Same 'ol swap. Thanks Trump", ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : > Donald Trump’s budget director’s Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bill would socialize risk and privatize profit Same 'ol, same 'ol.", '>>{b0ltzmann138e-23} : But I was told that there would trickle down economics', '>>{MostlyCarbonite} : A flood at the top and a drop at the bottom.', '>>{bonerknocker} : Ahh, well, this has always been the scam people. Try to exploit the situation, get high on hopium of change, or blissfully ignore the situation and die poor.', '>>{SeenItAllHeardItAll} : Is this really business as usual or is this major story considering the huge amount of money involved? > When combined with the price of the prohibition on charging the backstop, the total cost of Mulvaney’s bill will equal roughly $405 billion. The beneficiaries would be investors in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.', ">>{LesterPearsonsProjct} : Isn't that almost how Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were designed to work?", '>>{frobro989} : Fannie and Freddie are one of the only reasons people can buy houses. They literally have one source of revenue. This is a sensationalist article that makes incorrect assumptions.']]

classify and reply

['>>{Om_ShantiShanti} : Bernie Sanders is the best gift we Trump supporters could ever have asked for.', '>>{backpackwayne} : Bernie pushing another fallacy he can not possibly deliver on. Does he even know what a contested convention is? It is not going to happen. Zero chance. Stop stringing your supporters on with false hopes. Could of have ended a hero but instead he chose to be a zero. Shame on you Bernie.', ">>{SallyYatesIsAHero} : A Trump hotel project seems to have involved a front for Iran's Revolutionary Guard", '>>{Theodoros9} : I think all the headphone drama overshadowed what is a really solid phone in the 7, it has a lot of useful updates.', '>>{RyanClinton2017} : Giving money to terrorists, where those terrorists are possibly using it for laundering. The journalist spent 3 months on the story and did more due diligence than the Trump team did. The original story - http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/13/donald-trumps-worst-deal', '>>{Neodictator} : The only thing that will bring him down is his tax returns. You have to imagine all his time to date has been spent fortifying or destroying those returns. A whistle-blower will almost certainly be killed for it.', ">>{laliari} : Here's a great tl;dr thread on Twitter. https://twitter.com/SethCotlar/status/838761368400494592 Unwitting financier of ISIS?", ">>{bubblezpop} : I thought I would be upset over the headphone jack but all these updates really made me overlook it! I upgraded from my 6 so I'm glad!", '>>{MortWellian} : And here are [five major points](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C6QO1YpWMAEJjTB.jpg:large) to the report.', ">>{UvonTheDeplorable} : The Revolutionary Guard is not in any way shape or form in bed with ISIS. In fact, they're consulting with the Iraqi Army to drive them out of their ~~puppet~~ neighbor.", ">>{iPhoned} : Same here, glad they provided us with a dongle AND pair of lightening headphones. Didn't read anything about this so it was a nice surprise", '>>{FreedomofPreach} : Fuck Trump he has no chance. Gary Johnson would win if it was between him and Trump.', '>>{yuhche} : Anyone know how much storage is available in each capacity out of the box?', '>>{gk128} : Not out of the box, but I have a 32GB. USED: 6.84GB / Available: 20.77GB So about 26.77 GB free after iOS10.', ">>{edgemaster191} : The iPhone 7 is the first iPhone to make me stand up and take notice. I'm seriously considering a 128gb 7 to replace my aging Nexus 6. I think it's time to take a break from Android and give iOS an honest shot.", ">>{quantamskates} : The speed difference in performance outside of gaming is isn't really noticeable though, think that's a moot point.", '>>{DragonPup} : 16th submission to this subreddit about this in 24 hours.', ">>{Simoni_Deo} : Sanders must have prophetic powers because he's right about this one.", '>>{red-light} : “Saudi Arabia — and I get along great with all of them. They buy apartments from me,” Trump said in Mobile, Ala. “They spend $40 million, $50 million. Am I supposed to dislike them? I like them very much.” http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/exclusive-donald-trump-made-millions-saudi-government-article-1.2777211 ------------------------------------------------------------ President-elect Donald Trump registered eight companies during his presidential campaign that appear to be tied to hotel interests in Saudi Arabia, according to a report in The Washington Post. Trump registered the companies in August 2015, shortly after launching his presidential bid, according to The Post. "I would want to protect Saudi Arabia," he said during the interview. During his presidential campaign, the president-elect often called out his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, for accepting money from Saudi Arabia for the Clinton Foundation. http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/306990-trump-appeared-to-register-eight-companies-in-saudi-arabia', ">>{tookmyname} : I don't think you or sanders know what a contested convention is.", '>>{Simoni_Deo} : He, and I, that is we, know everything. You cannot fight this omniscience. We will win, in the end.', ">>{Anal_Vacuum} : Really? Johnson is a lunatic who wouldn't stand a chance. There's a reason he's running third party, he wouldn't win in a major one.", '>>{ImYoreHuckleberry} : lets not forget his rioters! they are awesome for trump too', '>>{Sports-Nerd} : What was described in the article from The New Yorker is just bad business practice.', ">>{MartinSchou} : Yeah, but Saudi Arabia is the terrorism sponsor and theocratic dictatorship that we like, while Iran is the terrorism sponsor and theocratic dictatorship that we don't like.", '>>{Whats_a_narwhal} : The 128GB model has 121.97 out of the box it seems.', ">>{Tcampd12} : All you need to know. Check out how Putin got all his money. Steve Bannon thinks just like Putin and we all know he is always in Donnie's ear.", '>>{ImYoreHuckleberry} : can you spare $27? I will gladly give you a contested convention tomorrow for a $27 donation today!', '>>{QuantumNukeCola} : Before buying an iPhone I tried windows phone and android. When my android got stolen I bought an iPhone because why not? On my second one now with an i7.', '>>{toker7} : what evidence is there that these rioters were Sanders supporters. I have yet to see any, yet you keep posting comments that they were Sanders supporters. Could you post a link to your source?', ">>{FreedomofPreach} : > Really? Trump is a lunatic who wouldn't stand a chance. There's a reason he's running Republican, he wouldn't win without racism.", ">>{macbookvirgin} : I went ahead and got the 256gb version because it was like 5 dollars more a month. I came from a 16gb that was cramped for about a year. I don't even know wtf I'm supposed to do all of this and I doubt I'll use more than 25% of it", '>>{THE_PINPAL614} : 32GB base is standard for all phones except the SE now. The 6S dropped from £539 for 16GB to £499 for 32GB', '>>{toker7} : Contested convention = no single candidate has a majority of delegates before the first official vote. Super Delegates are not bound and therefor cannot be counted in a candidates delegate total prior to the first round of voting. Neither candidate can clinch the nomination prior to the convention. It is mathematically impossible.', ">>{i0BAYi} : Waiting for my pre-order to come in. I'm an 8 year android vet and I am leaving my Note 5 behind me.", ">>{edgemaster191} : Yeah I've been with Android since 2010 when I got my Evo 4G. I figure now is as good of time as any to try something new.", ">>{edgemaster191} : Yeah I've been with Android since 2010, figure it won't hurt to switch for a year or two. I have a Lumia 640 that I bought for $30, windows phone just isn't for me.", '>>{backpackwayne} : > Contested convention = no single candidate has a majority of delegates before the first official vote. #FALSE It is contested **AFTER** the first official vote.', '>>{ImYoreHuckleberry} : Its the part where they are chanting "bernie" https://youtu.be/6LGBOfZgu6U?t=13 you people are in such denial. but the clock is counting down. 48 hours left', ">>{Anal_Vacuum} : He already won the primaries, and he's beating Hillary in polls.", ">>{FreedomofPreach} : > he's beating Hillary in polls. Really???", '>>{Quagmicah} : I feel it. I thought I could fill it with music and 30 albums later I have not made even a slight dent.', '>>{Anal_Vacuum} : [Yeah his average has been .2% ahead of Hillarys](http://wgntv.com/2016/05/24/trump-nabs-first-lead-against-clinton-in-poll/)', ">>{hircine1} : I fully agree, this is easily the best phone I've ever had.", '>>{RawhlTahhyde} : Will the Bernie spam stop on Tuesday or will we get "if every superdelegate switches we can still win"', ">>{Om_ShantiShanti} : BernieBros aren't going anywhere, even if their candidate is leaving the scene", '>>{vootator} : Bernie is going to dice HRC in CA and will win the nomination in the single biggest upset in corporate sponsored election history. Mark my words.', '>>{Popetown} : I just thought of something. I wonder how easy it would be to cannibalize the lightning buds to splice into a reclaimed set of proper buds that are 3.5?', '>>{vootator} : Slaughter. Wipe out. Ass pummel. HRC is done. You can hear the train coming.', ">>{cloudlight} : The battery life is unreal. I can't believe how well it has held up since it came in yesterday.", '>>{akm862} : Does anyone know if the lightning headphones will be compatible with any older iPhone models?', ">>{i0BAYi} : Oh wow, I date back to the OG droid. That's around the same time frame.", '>>{Seattleape} : Plugged them into my 6 while I was waiting on my 7 to update, and worked perfectly.', '>>{Maddoktor2} : Only because Bernie is a sore loser piece of shit. And even then, it won\'t be contested. One vote and it\'s bye-bye Bernie and Trump is welcome to the bullshit of his supporters after they leave the Democratic party as quickly as they joined it, but in a huff on their way out, and good riddance to them. They and their brand of "support" were never needed or wanted, and won\'t be missed.', '>>{sfmtd} : Or you could duct tape the headphones to the dongle ^^', ">>{CodyCus} : While you make some good points, I can't help but disagree with this post. I am an avid iPhone user, but lets go over these posts together. First off, removing the headphone jack is not the same as removing the floppy disc back in the day. Everyone uses headphone jacks and (while they do have alternative options) there is no real suitable replacement in the industry as of now. Being waterproof is nice, but is by no means an innovation in the industry and is honestly bot even as protected as some other phones on the market. Stereo speakers is nice. Again not innovative but still a nice add on. Internal storage has always been an issue with iPhones, and this line is no different. I shouldn't have to pay $129 more for the next storage unit up. The camera update is a plus, if you get the 7plus. The 7 has an average camera at best. Performance. This is where you got me with this post. This phone is running a quad core processor, but not quite up to par with the snapdragon processor in the S7 edge. All in all, this phone is average at best, missing some key features, and should be regarded as such. All this being said, I still want the phone, but this subreddit is full of biased posts like this one.", '>>{svk7} : >Waterproof 1) No, not waterPROOF. WaterRESISTANT, which is a world of a difference. It cannot withstand more than 1 meter of water pressure. This is for small splashes. Nothing more. 2) So what? Samsung did this **without** killing the audio jack. >Stereo speakers 1) See above #2 >32gb base 1) See above #1 2) Apple has been slapping their users in the face with 16 GB for the last year. That they *just* started offering 32 GB is an absolute JOKE.', '>>{Popetown} : Well, I was trying to streamline the situation but I suppose I could also go the other direction and hook some speakers up to the Lightning to 3.5 adapter then enclose that speaker into a cardboard box which also contains an atmospheric microphone and amp which outputs to a 3.5 jack... I might be onto somewhere there.', '>>{Mavendreas} : You cant compare samsungs speakers to even one front facing speaker. There is no comparison. Also the zoom is available right now on the plus, it is the portrait photo that is not currently available.', '>>{raf-owens} : >you people are in such denial. Those are Hillary supporters trying to make Bernie look bad!', '>>{__redruM} : Are the new features IOS10 features or iphone 7?', ">>{Carlos_Danger} : See this is the problem with this sub. They spread this nonsense and believe they're right It's a contested convention if after the first vote nobody has the required number. Ask when Clinton wins the nomination on the first ballot it isn't s contested convention.", '>>{AliasHandler} : Put your money where your mouth is. $25 to a charity of the winners choice says you are absolutely wrong.', ">>{EmbraceTheFlummery} : He doesn't know how to do math, does he?", ">>{4thezulus} : >Performance. This is where you got me with this post. This phone is running a quad core processor, but not quite up to par with the snapdragon processor in the S7 edge. Benchmarks disagree. Where are you coming from with this claim? Everything I've seen has the A10 as the best chip on market now. One benchmark site as an example: https://daringfireball.net/linked/2016/09/14/geekbench-android-a10", ">>{avoicelikealion} : Not everyone uses the headphones jack though. It's widely used, yes. But not by everyone. Plus Apple includes an adapter to ease this issue. I could see this being a serious issue if a vast majority of users are constantly charging their phones while trying to use headphones, but I don't think that's a common occurrence. At least not from what I've seen.", '>>{CodyCus} : I plug my charge in and my headphone jack in every single day in my car, a 2014 Sentra, and now I cannot do that without spending more money. Its just a major inconvenience and a way for them to make more money off attachments. The 3.5mm jack is the most widely used audio jack on the market. Its a bit ridiculous.', '>>{Supersmartguy123} : How about he loser donates 25 to the winners campaign', ">>{crashing_this_thread} : I'd try to enjoy it. Have the same luxury problem, but with 64GB. I figured I could download movies or TV shows onto it, but damn Netflix streams everything so that plan didn't work. Look around for something. One day you'll find something you have denied yourself because you didn't want to waste space on your phone.", ">>{elynnism} : I went from android to windows to iPhone. Didn't really want to break from windows phone but Verizon was relentless about not supporting it so I took the plunge. Have really enjoyed my iPhone experience. I had two previous androids that bricked with their new updates and was tired and frustrated that apps wouldn't work after certain updates. I haven't had issues like that wth iPhone. Only real issue I had was my phone would shut off at 26% battery and wouldn't turn back on until I plugged it in, but an update came out and fixed it within a few weeks.", ">>{AliasHandler} : I'd prefer charity because one of the campaigns will be dead at that point. But whatever the OP wants to agree to works for me.", '>>{crashing_this_thread} : >buys iPhone >duct tapes shit to it Why not just wear a track suit and move to Poland while you are at it, filthy peasant./s You could use tape that is a little less eye catching though.', ">>{crashing_this_thread} : It's usually always good on launch though. Then it disappoints further down the line. Usually just in time for the next upgrade.", '>>{GarciaJones} : You do realize that even android enthusiasts are aware that apples iOS being built around hardware is much easier to run than an android counterpart right ? Don\'t write a bullshit post like this and find the flaws. Everything in life has a flaw. Fucking human life has flaws, death, taxes, cancer . Chill out man you sound so damn spoiled writing like this . Look, I\'m a dual android guy and iPhone guy. I\'m a sound engineer and having both allows me the best of both worlds especially working in entertainment. The way Apple hardware delegates to software internally is much easier than android so, as benchmarks show, it\'s up there with its rival counterparts in android. Imagine having a car with 8 cylinders and weighing over 3,000 pounds, you brag to your friends how powerful and full of torque the transmission is . You see my car which is all electric. On paper you see a weaker transmission, not understanding that by being electric the torque is higher and can keep up with your V8. These are phones. People here in this sub love to find the cool and easy things about t and talk. Coming here with that attitude doesn\'t only make you sound like a first world millennial bitching about problems you didn\'t even knew existed prior to 7 years ago, but worse, it could have been your last thought and shout to the world. If you died the last thing you said to the entire span of human evolution was " this phone is average at best " Chill my dude. Relax . Don\'t do it. Now take a look at these Boca shots I mean, unreal!', ">>{jphilly11} : Dude, just shut up. Yous a hater who's having a bad day. Want a hug?", ">>{lmao_zebong} : I felt the same way until I bought I $15 Bluetooth-to-aux receiver and realized how much better and more convenient it is. Apple is definitely a bit premature with the wireless push but embrace it dude, not plugging shit in all the time is awesome. Edit: I should say I don't even have the 7 yet, I'm using the Bluetooth adapter with my 6S and I wish I got it sooner.", '>>{CodyCus} : Im concerned with quality loss in the audio with Bluetooth. Any noticeable issues?', ">>{lmao_zebong} : I have my wife's iPhone 7 Plus in my hand right now and I am 2x optical zooming like a madman. The only thing that's coming in a software update is the new Portrait mode.", '>>{lmao_zebong} : I am sure there is some quality loss but not that I have noticed, bass still sounds good and audio sounds clear but you might have a more finely tuned ear than I do.', '>>{CodyCus} : Any chance you can link me to the adapter you have?', '>>{timakudo} : Omg the stereo speakers. Netflix without cupping or headphones. So good.', '>>{Theodoros9} : > Performance. This is where you got me with this post. This phone is running a quad core processor, but not quite up to par with the snapdragon processor in the S7 edge. > Sorry, what? The iPhone has been miles ahead of the S7 in every benchmark.', '>>{xBartLuke} : Do you guys coming from iPhone 6s see performance improvement?', ">>{blair3d} : Just get a head unit with Bluetooth and USB. They are super cheap these days and you get the best of both worlds. You can charge and listen off the lightning cable, and if you are lazy like me, just Bluetooth connect as soon as you get in the car, no pissing about. I have been using that setup for the last 3 years and I can't understand why everyone flipped their toys when Apple removed the headphone jack. I don't think I have charged and listened to my phone at the same time since I got my 6s. And I fly heaps...", '>>{CodyCus} : Just bought it today from frys, seems to work great! Thank you so much for the suggestion!']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{SallyYatesIsAHero} : A Trump hotel project seems to have involved a front for Iran's Revolutionary Guard", '>>{RyanClinton2017} : Giving money to terrorists, where those terrorists are possibly using it for laundering. The journalist spent 3 months on the story and did more due diligence than the Trump team did. The original story - http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/13/donald-trumps-worst-deal', '>>{Neodictator} : The only thing that will bring him down is his tax returns. You have to imagine all his time to date has been spent fortifying or destroying those returns. A whistle-blower will almost certainly be killed for it.', ">>{laliari} : Here's a great tl;dr thread on Twitter. https://twitter.com/SethCotlar/status/838761368400494592 Unwitting financier of ISIS?", '>>{MortWellian} : And here are [five major points](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C6QO1YpWMAEJjTB.jpg:large) to the report.', ">>{UvonTheDeplorable} : The Revolutionary Guard is not in any way shape or form in bed with ISIS. In fact, they're consulting with the Iraqi Army to drive them out of their ~~puppet~~ neighbor.", '>>{red-light} : “Saudi Arabia — and I get along great with all of them. They buy apartments from me,” Trump said in Mobile, Ala. “They spend $40 million, $50 million. Am I supposed to dislike them? I like them very much.” http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/exclusive-donald-trump-made-millions-saudi-government-article-1.2777211 ------------------------------------------------------------ President-elect Donald Trump registered eight companies during his presidential campaign that appear to be tied to hotel interests in Saudi Arabia, according to a report in The Washington Post. Trump registered the companies in August 2015, shortly after launching his presidential bid, according to The Post. "I would want to protect Saudi Arabia," he said during the interview. During his presidential campaign, the president-elect often called out his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, for accepting money from Saudi Arabia for the Clinton Foundation. http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/306990-trump-appeared-to-register-eight-companies-in-saudi-arabia', '>>{Sports-Nerd} : What was described in the article from The New Yorker is just bad business practice.', ">>{MartinSchou} : Yeah, but Saudi Arabia is the terrorism sponsor and theocratic dictatorship that we like, while Iran is the terrorism sponsor and theocratic dictatorship that we don't like.", ">>{Tcampd12} : All you need to know. Check out how Putin got all his money. Steve Bannon thinks just like Putin and we all know he is always in Donnie's ear."], ['>>{Theodoros9} : I think all the headphone drama overshadowed what is a really solid phone in the 7, it has a lot of useful updates.', ">>{bubblezpop} : I thought I would be upset over the headphone jack but all these updates really made me overlook it! I upgraded from my 6 so I'm glad!", ">>{iPhoned} : Same here, glad they provided us with a dongle AND pair of lightening headphones. Didn't read anything about this so it was a nice surprise", '>>{yuhche} : Anyone know how much storage is available in each capacity out of the box?', '>>{gk128} : Not out of the box, but I have a 32GB. USED: 6.84GB / Available: 20.77GB So about 26.77 GB free after iOS10.', ">>{edgemaster191} : The iPhone 7 is the first iPhone to make me stand up and take notice. I'm seriously considering a 128gb 7 to replace my aging Nexus 6. I think it's time to take a break from Android and give iOS an honest shot.", ">>{quantamskates} : The speed difference in performance outside of gaming is isn't really noticeable though, think that's a moot point.", '>>{Whats_a_narwhal} : The 128GB model has 121.97 out of the box it seems.', '>>{QuantumNukeCola} : Before buying an iPhone I tried windows phone and android. When my android got stolen I bought an iPhone because why not? On my second one now with an i7.', ">>{macbookvirgin} : I went ahead and got the 256gb version because it was like 5 dollars more a month. I came from a 16gb that was cramped for about a year. I don't even know wtf I'm supposed to do all of this and I doubt I'll use more than 25% of it", '>>{THE_PINPAL614} : 32GB base is standard for all phones except the SE now. The 6S dropped from £539 for 16GB to £499 for 32GB', ">>{i0BAYi} : Waiting for my pre-order to come in. I'm an 8 year android vet and I am leaving my Note 5 behind me.", ">>{edgemaster191} : Yeah I've been with Android since 2010 when I got my Evo 4G. I figure now is as good of time as any to try something new.", ">>{edgemaster191} : Yeah I've been with Android since 2010, figure it won't hurt to switch for a year or two. I have a Lumia 640 that I bought for $30, windows phone just isn't for me.", '>>{Quagmicah} : I feel it. I thought I could fill it with music and 30 albums later I have not made even a slight dent.', ">>{hircine1} : I fully agree, this is easily the best phone I've ever had.", '>>{Popetown} : I just thought of something. I wonder how easy it would be to cannibalize the lightning buds to splice into a reclaimed set of proper buds that are 3.5?', ">>{cloudlight} : The battery life is unreal. I can't believe how well it has held up since it came in yesterday.", '>>{akm862} : Does anyone know if the lightning headphones will be compatible with any older iPhone models?', ">>{i0BAYi} : Oh wow, I date back to the OG droid. That's around the same time frame.", '>>{Seattleape} : Plugged them into my 6 while I was waiting on my 7 to update, and worked perfectly.', '>>{sfmtd} : Or you could duct tape the headphones to the dongle ^^', ">>{CodyCus} : While you make some good points, I can't help but disagree with this post. I am an avid iPhone user, but lets go over these posts together. First off, removing the headphone jack is not the same as removing the floppy disc back in the day. Everyone uses headphone jacks and (while they do have alternative options) there is no real suitable replacement in the industry as of now. Being waterproof is nice, but is by no means an innovation in the industry and is honestly bot even as protected as some other phones on the market. Stereo speakers is nice. Again not innovative but still a nice add on. Internal storage has always been an issue with iPhones, and this line is no different. I shouldn't have to pay $129 more for the next storage unit up. The camera update is a plus, if you get the 7plus. The 7 has an average camera at best. Performance. This is where you got me with this post. This phone is running a quad core processor, but not quite up to par with the snapdragon processor in the S7 edge. All in all, this phone is average at best, missing some key features, and should be regarded as such. All this being said, I still want the phone, but this subreddit is full of biased posts like this one.", '>>{svk7} : >Waterproof 1) No, not waterPROOF. WaterRESISTANT, which is a world of a difference. It cannot withstand more than 1 meter of water pressure. This is for small splashes. Nothing more. 2) So what? Samsung did this **without** killing the audio jack. >Stereo speakers 1) See above #2 >32gb base 1) See above #1 2) Apple has been slapping their users in the face with 16 GB for the last year. That they *just* started offering 32 GB is an absolute JOKE.', '>>{Popetown} : Well, I was trying to streamline the situation but I suppose I could also go the other direction and hook some speakers up to the Lightning to 3.5 adapter then enclose that speaker into a cardboard box which also contains an atmospheric microphone and amp which outputs to a 3.5 jack... I might be onto somewhere there.', '>>{Mavendreas} : You cant compare samsungs speakers to even one front facing speaker. There is no comparison. Also the zoom is available right now on the plus, it is the portrait photo that is not currently available.', '>>{__redruM} : Are the new features IOS10 features or iphone 7?', ">>{4thezulus} : >Performance. This is where you got me with this post. This phone is running a quad core processor, but not quite up to par with the snapdragon processor in the S7 edge. Benchmarks disagree. Where are you coming from with this claim? Everything I've seen has the A10 as the best chip on market now. One benchmark site as an example: https://daringfireball.net/linked/2016/09/14/geekbench-android-a10", ">>{avoicelikealion} : Not everyone uses the headphones jack though. It's widely used, yes. But not by everyone. Plus Apple includes an adapter to ease this issue. I could see this being a serious issue if a vast majority of users are constantly charging their phones while trying to use headphones, but I don't think that's a common occurrence. At least not from what I've seen.", '>>{CodyCus} : I plug my charge in and my headphone jack in every single day in my car, a 2014 Sentra, and now I cannot do that without spending more money. Its just a major inconvenience and a way for them to make more money off attachments. The 3.5mm jack is the most widely used audio jack on the market. Its a bit ridiculous.', ">>{crashing_this_thread} : I'd try to enjoy it. Have the same luxury problem, but with 64GB. I figured I could download movies or TV shows onto it, but damn Netflix streams everything so that plan didn't work. Look around for something. One day you'll find something you have denied yourself because you didn't want to waste space on your phone.", ">>{elynnism} : I went from android to windows to iPhone. Didn't really want to break from windows phone but Verizon was relentless about not supporting it so I took the plunge. Have really enjoyed my iPhone experience. I had two previous androids that bricked with their new updates and was tired and frustrated that apps wouldn't work after certain updates. I haven't had issues like that wth iPhone. Only real issue I had was my phone would shut off at 26% battery and wouldn't turn back on until I plugged it in, but an update came out and fixed it within a few weeks.", '>>{crashing_this_thread} : >buys iPhone >duct tapes shit to it Why not just wear a track suit and move to Poland while you are at it, filthy peasant./s You could use tape that is a little less eye catching though.', ">>{crashing_this_thread} : It's usually always good on launch though. Then it disappoints further down the line. Usually just in time for the next upgrade.", '>>{GarciaJones} : You do realize that even android enthusiasts are aware that apples iOS being built around hardware is much easier to run than an android counterpart right ? Don\'t write a bullshit post like this and find the flaws. Everything in life has a flaw. Fucking human life has flaws, death, taxes, cancer . Chill out man you sound so damn spoiled writing like this . Look, I\'m a dual android guy and iPhone guy. I\'m a sound engineer and having both allows me the best of both worlds especially working in entertainment. The way Apple hardware delegates to software internally is much easier than android so, as benchmarks show, it\'s up there with its rival counterparts in android. Imagine having a car with 8 cylinders and weighing over 3,000 pounds, you brag to your friends how powerful and full of torque the transmission is . You see my car which is all electric. On paper you see a weaker transmission, not understanding that by being electric the torque is higher and can keep up with your V8. These are phones. People here in this sub love to find the cool and easy things about t and talk. Coming here with that attitude doesn\'t only make you sound like a first world millennial bitching about problems you didn\'t even knew existed prior to 7 years ago, but worse, it could have been your last thought and shout to the world. If you died the last thing you said to the entire span of human evolution was " this phone is average at best " Chill my dude. Relax . Don\'t do it. Now take a look at these Boca shots I mean, unreal!', ">>{jphilly11} : Dude, just shut up. Yous a hater who's having a bad day. Want a hug?", ">>{lmao_zebong} : I felt the same way until I bought I $15 Bluetooth-to-aux receiver and realized how much better and more convenient it is. Apple is definitely a bit premature with the wireless push but embrace it dude, not plugging shit in all the time is awesome. Edit: I should say I don't even have the 7 yet, I'm using the Bluetooth adapter with my 6S and I wish I got it sooner.", '>>{CodyCus} : Im concerned with quality loss in the audio with Bluetooth. Any noticeable issues?', ">>{lmao_zebong} : I have my wife's iPhone 7 Plus in my hand right now and I am 2x optical zooming like a madman. The only thing that's coming in a software update is the new Portrait mode.", '>>{lmao_zebong} : I am sure there is some quality loss but not that I have noticed, bass still sounds good and audio sounds clear but you might have a more finely tuned ear than I do.', '>>{CodyCus} : Any chance you can link me to the adapter you have?', '>>{timakudo} : Omg the stereo speakers. Netflix without cupping or headphones. So good.', '>>{Theodoros9} : > Performance. This is where you got me with this post. This phone is running a quad core processor, but not quite up to par with the snapdragon processor in the S7 edge. > Sorry, what? The iPhone has been miles ahead of the S7 in every benchmark.', '>>{xBartLuke} : Do you guys coming from iPhone 6s see performance improvement?', ">>{blair3d} : Just get a head unit with Bluetooth and USB. They are super cheap these days and you get the best of both worlds. You can charge and listen off the lightning cable, and if you are lazy like me, just Bluetooth connect as soon as you get in the car, no pissing about. I have been using that setup for the last 3 years and I can't understand why everyone flipped their toys when Apple removed the headphone jack. I don't think I have charged and listened to my phone at the same time since I got my 6s. And I fly heaps...", '>>{CodyCus} : Just bought it today from frys, seems to work great! Thank you so much for the suggestion!'], ['>>{Om_ShantiShanti} : Bernie Sanders is the best gift we Trump supporters could ever have asked for.', '>>{backpackwayne} : Bernie pushing another fallacy he can not possibly deliver on. Does he even know what a contested convention is? It is not going to happen. Zero chance. Stop stringing your supporters on with false hopes. Could of have ended a hero but instead he chose to be a zero. Shame on you Bernie.', '>>{FreedomofPreach} : Fuck Trump he has no chance. Gary Johnson would win if it was between him and Trump.', '>>{DragonPup} : 16th submission to this subreddit about this in 24 hours.', ">>{Simoni_Deo} : Sanders must have prophetic powers because he's right about this one.", ">>{tookmyname} : I don't think you or sanders know what a contested convention is.", '>>{Simoni_Deo} : He, and I, that is we, know everything. You cannot fight this omniscience. We will win, in the end.', ">>{Anal_Vacuum} : Really? Johnson is a lunatic who wouldn't stand a chance. There's a reason he's running third party, he wouldn't win in a major one.", '>>{ImYoreHuckleberry} : lets not forget his rioters! they are awesome for trump too', '>>{ImYoreHuckleberry} : can you spare $27? I will gladly give you a contested convention tomorrow for a $27 donation today!', '>>{toker7} : what evidence is there that these rioters were Sanders supporters. I have yet to see any, yet you keep posting comments that they were Sanders supporters. Could you post a link to your source?', ">>{FreedomofPreach} : > Really? Trump is a lunatic who wouldn't stand a chance. There's a reason he's running Republican, he wouldn't win without racism.", '>>{toker7} : Contested convention = no single candidate has a majority of delegates before the first official vote. Super Delegates are not bound and therefor cannot be counted in a candidates delegate total prior to the first round of voting. Neither candidate can clinch the nomination prior to the convention. It is mathematically impossible.', '>>{backpackwayne} : > Contested convention = no single candidate has a majority of delegates before the first official vote. #FALSE It is contested **AFTER** the first official vote.', '>>{ImYoreHuckleberry} : Its the part where they are chanting "bernie" https://youtu.be/6LGBOfZgu6U?t=13 you people are in such denial. but the clock is counting down. 48 hours left', ">>{Anal_Vacuum} : He already won the primaries, and he's beating Hillary in polls.", ">>{FreedomofPreach} : > he's beating Hillary in polls. Really???", '>>{Anal_Vacuum} : [Yeah his average has been .2% ahead of Hillarys](http://wgntv.com/2016/05/24/trump-nabs-first-lead-against-clinton-in-poll/)', '>>{RawhlTahhyde} : Will the Bernie spam stop on Tuesday or will we get "if every superdelegate switches we can still win"', ">>{Om_ShantiShanti} : BernieBros aren't going anywhere, even if their candidate is leaving the scene", '>>{vootator} : Bernie is going to dice HRC in CA and will win the nomination in the single biggest upset in corporate sponsored election history. Mark my words.', '>>{vootator} : Slaughter. Wipe out. Ass pummel. HRC is done. You can hear the train coming.', '>>{Maddoktor2} : Only because Bernie is a sore loser piece of shit. And even then, it won\'t be contested. One vote and it\'s bye-bye Bernie and Trump is welcome to the bullshit of his supporters after they leave the Democratic party as quickly as they joined it, but in a huff on their way out, and good riddance to them. They and their brand of "support" were never needed or wanted, and won\'t be missed.', '>>{raf-owens} : >you people are in such denial. Those are Hillary supporters trying to make Bernie look bad!', ">>{Carlos_Danger} : See this is the problem with this sub. They spread this nonsense and believe they're right It's a contested convention if after the first vote nobody has the required number. Ask when Clinton wins the nomination on the first ballot it isn't s contested convention.", '>>{AliasHandler} : Put your money where your mouth is. $25 to a charity of the winners choice says you are absolutely wrong.', ">>{EmbraceTheFlummery} : He doesn't know how to do math, does he?", '>>{Supersmartguy123} : How about he loser donates 25 to the winners campaign', ">>{AliasHandler} : I'd prefer charity because one of the campaigns will be dead at that point. But whatever the OP wants to agree to works for me."]]

classify and reply

['>>{wang168} : Is it me or this sounds like whole bunch of Apple propaganda?', ">>{PerilousAll} : They make it sound like the headphone jack takes up half the space inside the phone. You want a bigger battery don't you?? DON'T YOU???!!", ">>{Crazycatguy2017} : Meh, is it really a big deal if they get rid of the headphone jack? Now saying that, it still pisses me off a little. I don't understand the pursuit for thinness. So many of these new fangled devices are so delicate without a case. I wish they'd just make a durable real world phone, and no I'm not talking about the monstrosities that are phones that don't require a case because of their gaudy outdoorsy active look. It's all getting a little ridiculous imo", '>>{distressed_bacon} : IIRC, I remember a video with Jony Ive where he said the thickness of the Iphone 6 was determined because of the headphones jack. I believe he said something along the lines of "we could have made it thinner, but we could to accommodate a headphones jack."', ">>{wang168} : We there's are plenty of phones out there with dual speaker and better battery capacity without needing to cut out the jack. Also removing the audio jack does not reduce cost for the consumer.", ">>{mediuqrepmes} : Did you read the *second and third paragraphs* of the article you're trashing? > Yes, that’s right: The headphone jack is going away, starting now. > And not just on the iPhone. In fact, Apple’s not even first. Moto led the revolution in the US with its gorgeous new Moto Droid Z phones—which have no headphone jacks. In China, LeEco and other companies are already omitting the jack. Other brands worldwide will be following suit. It's a general argument for the demise of the headphone jack, not a specific argument in favor of Apple's products.", '>>{OGNips} : But then how is Apple going to make money after you break your phone 6 months after getting it?!', ">>{Frodo79} : It's you. Did you read the article? Apple's not the first to do this.", '>>{Whipit} : To me, yeah, it is a big deal. Literally a deal breaker.', '>>{wang168} : Let\'s be real, have you heard of the company LeEco in China before this article? This is the same as some supplement company making claims using terms like "study have shown" or " research have shown". The only reason apple is getting rid of the the jack is purely to up sell consumers on their wireless headphones . Like, ask yourself is your current iPhone not thin enough?', '>>{snottyhamsterbutt} : Definitely you. If it was actual propaganda, why would they note that the usb c connector is more "sensible" than what Apple already has? Also, other people have noted that Apple was not the only one to bring this issue. P.S. If I remember correctly, audio quality diminishes through bluetooth, so I don\'t think that the headphone jack would be any worse.', ">>{Mahadragon} : Ok so you don't understand why they got rid of the headphone jack for the sake of thinness. How about for the sake of a bigger battery? Or a second camera that will allow you to take better pictures?", ">>{Mahadragon} : It's a deal breaker until you start seeing Samsung and everyone else follow suit, cause I got news for you, it's coming whether you like it or not.", ">>{shanenanigans1} : Just add a millimeter to the phone. Lol. It won't make a real-world difference. The iPhone already has a big ass camera protrusion. Just add thickness until that bulge is gone and fill the space with battery. Problem solved.", ">>{shanenanigans1} : I haven't. But I have heard of Motorola. I agree though, this is just a cash grab. Sound has to be converted back to analog by a dac. So the whole 'digital signal' bullshit is just that. Bullshit.", ">>{ZackZak30} : You're right; it's all a conspiracy. Apple is taking the headphone jack out so they can mind-control all their consumers via the new bluetooth headphones. The next step? World Domination.", ">>{scar1em} : Well I gotta say a lot this is bullcrap. I already think my phone is thin enough(I have a galaxy s5) and its not like 4 mm^3 is gonna make my battery life double or anything. I think the big reason why everyone is tossing out the 3.5 mm jack is because usb-c has native HDCP compliance. This allows them to stop any traffic that doesn't have this license ie: any pirated stuff just won't play. Unlike the 3.5 mm heahphone jack, this allows companies and producers another way to infringe upon what we can do with our mobile devices. So in the end, its just another way to monitor and control what we do.", ">>{YourInnerTaco} : Better question is how do I charge my phone and listen to music at the same time, assuming I don't have Blue tooth headphones", '>>{patdude} : I didnt realise pogue was on Apples pay-roll??? Apple stand to make a pile of case out of licensing fees as everyone rushes to re-tool their ear wear. All I have to say is this: God help Apple if the iPhone doesnt look and feel substantially different to the iPhone 6. With smartphone design innovation moving so rapidly the market for samey samey design has dried up.', ">>{TexanSJF} : It's a cash grab. Plain and simple. They did it with the new chargers. Now with the headphone jack. Now selling New Headphones for 30 bucks that probably cost 5$ to manufacture. Except Everyone has to buy them now. Boom instant mass profit. Blatantly easy to see.", ">>{Crazycatguy2017} : Sorry, my comment wasn't very clear. What I mean is, why must we sacrifice at all? A phone that's partially larger would allow for both a battery that has a greater capacity and the earphone jack. I'm not sad to see the earphone jack go, I'm aggregated that the pursuit of 'thin'' has come at the cost of practicality. In that sense simply a durable phone that I don't have to worry about charging throughout the day.", '>>{mediuqrepmes} : > Let\'s be real, have you heard of the company LeEco in China before this article? No, but I don\'t follow Chinese phone manufacturers, so that\'s hardly a red flag. > This is the same as some supplement company making claims using terms like "study have shown" or " research have shown". No, it\'s really not like that at all. This article provides specific arguments rather than giving a hand-wavy, "studies have shown" explanation. > The only reason apple is getting rid of the the jack is purely to up sell consumers on their wireless headphones Speak for yourself. Getting rid of the jack creates room to add more components to the phone and it makes it easier to waterproof. Those are obvious, tangible benefits that have nothing to do with selling wireless headphones. > Like, ask yourself is your current iPhone not thin enough? A pointless question. I\'m always interested in a thinner phone.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{wang168} : Is it me or this sounds like whole bunch of Apple propaganda?', ">>{PerilousAll} : They make it sound like the headphone jack takes up half the space inside the phone. You want a bigger battery don't you?? DON'T YOU???!!", ">>{Crazycatguy2017} : Meh, is it really a big deal if they get rid of the headphone jack? Now saying that, it still pisses me off a little. I don't understand the pursuit for thinness. So many of these new fangled devices are so delicate without a case. I wish they'd just make a durable real world phone, and no I'm not talking about the monstrosities that are phones that don't require a case because of their gaudy outdoorsy active look. It's all getting a little ridiculous imo", '>>{distressed_bacon} : IIRC, I remember a video with Jony Ive where he said the thickness of the Iphone 6 was determined because of the headphones jack. I believe he said something along the lines of "we could have made it thinner, but we could to accommodate a headphones jack."', ">>{wang168} : We there's are plenty of phones out there with dual speaker and better battery capacity without needing to cut out the jack. Also removing the audio jack does not reduce cost for the consumer.", ">>{mediuqrepmes} : Did you read the *second and third paragraphs* of the article you're trashing? > Yes, that’s right: The headphone jack is going away, starting now. > And not just on the iPhone. In fact, Apple’s not even first. Moto led the revolution in the US with its gorgeous new Moto Droid Z phones—which have no headphone jacks. In China, LeEco and other companies are already omitting the jack. Other brands worldwide will be following suit. It's a general argument for the demise of the headphone jack, not a specific argument in favor of Apple's products.", '>>{OGNips} : But then how is Apple going to make money after you break your phone 6 months after getting it?!', ">>{Frodo79} : It's you. Did you read the article? Apple's not the first to do this.", '>>{Whipit} : To me, yeah, it is a big deal. Literally a deal breaker.', '>>{wang168} : Let\'s be real, have you heard of the company LeEco in China before this article? This is the same as some supplement company making claims using terms like "study have shown" or " research have shown". The only reason apple is getting rid of the the jack is purely to up sell consumers on their wireless headphones . Like, ask yourself is your current iPhone not thin enough?', '>>{snottyhamsterbutt} : Definitely you. If it was actual propaganda, why would they note that the usb c connector is more "sensible" than what Apple already has? Also, other people have noted that Apple was not the only one to bring this issue. P.S. If I remember correctly, audio quality diminishes through bluetooth, so I don\'t think that the headphone jack would be any worse.', ">>{Mahadragon} : Ok so you don't understand why they got rid of the headphone jack for the sake of thinness. How about for the sake of a bigger battery? Or a second camera that will allow you to take better pictures?", ">>{Mahadragon} : It's a deal breaker until you start seeing Samsung and everyone else follow suit, cause I got news for you, it's coming whether you like it or not.", ">>{shanenanigans1} : Just add a millimeter to the phone. Lol. It won't make a real-world difference. The iPhone already has a big ass camera protrusion. Just add thickness until that bulge is gone and fill the space with battery. Problem solved.", ">>{shanenanigans1} : I haven't. But I have heard of Motorola. I agree though, this is just a cash grab. Sound has to be converted back to analog by a dac. So the whole 'digital signal' bullshit is just that. Bullshit.", ">>{ZackZak30} : You're right; it's all a conspiracy. Apple is taking the headphone jack out so they can mind-control all their consumers via the new bluetooth headphones. The next step? World Domination.", ">>{scar1em} : Well I gotta say a lot this is bullcrap. I already think my phone is thin enough(I have a galaxy s5) and its not like 4 mm^3 is gonna make my battery life double or anything. I think the big reason why everyone is tossing out the 3.5 mm jack is because usb-c has native HDCP compliance. This allows them to stop any traffic that doesn't have this license ie: any pirated stuff just won't play. Unlike the 3.5 mm heahphone jack, this allows companies and producers another way to infringe upon what we can do with our mobile devices. So in the end, its just another way to monitor and control what we do.", ">>{YourInnerTaco} : Better question is how do I charge my phone and listen to music at the same time, assuming I don't have Blue tooth headphones", '>>{patdude} : I didnt realise pogue was on Apples pay-roll??? Apple stand to make a pile of case out of licensing fees as everyone rushes to re-tool their ear wear. All I have to say is this: God help Apple if the iPhone doesnt look and feel substantially different to the iPhone 6. With smartphone design innovation moving so rapidly the market for samey samey design has dried up.', ">>{TexanSJF} : It's a cash grab. Plain and simple. They did it with the new chargers. Now with the headphone jack. Now selling New Headphones for 30 bucks that probably cost 5$ to manufacture. Except Everyone has to buy them now. Boom instant mass profit. Blatantly easy to see.", ">>{Crazycatguy2017} : Sorry, my comment wasn't very clear. What I mean is, why must we sacrifice at all? A phone that's partially larger would allow for both a battery that has a greater capacity and the earphone jack. I'm not sad to see the earphone jack go, I'm aggregated that the pursuit of 'thin'' has come at the cost of practicality. In that sense simply a durable phone that I don't have to worry about charging throughout the day.", '>>{mediuqrepmes} : > Let\'s be real, have you heard of the company LeEco in China before this article? No, but I don\'t follow Chinese phone manufacturers, so that\'s hardly a red flag. > This is the same as some supplement company making claims using terms like "study have shown" or " research have shown". No, it\'s really not like that at all. This article provides specific arguments rather than giving a hand-wavy, "studies have shown" explanation. > The only reason apple is getting rid of the the jack is purely to up sell consumers on their wireless headphones Speak for yourself. Getting rid of the jack creates room to add more components to the phone and it makes it easier to waterproof. Those are obvious, tangible benefits that have nothing to do with selling wireless headphones. > Like, ask yourself is your current iPhone not thin enough? A pointless question. I\'m always interested in a thinner phone.']]

classify and reply

[">>{therealduff1} : Just swapped the brown leather iPhone 6S Plus case for the red leather iPhone 6S Plus case as the brown leather one one started getting black dots on it , but I've heard really bad things about the red leather one ... like the red just comes straight off when you clean it.. what should I do ?", '>>{dirtydevil_riv} : Donald Trump is creating a field day for the 1%', '>>{ktmkole9} : If you guys had to choose which iPhone is your favorite from the first to the last which is it?', '>>{ButlerianJihadist} : Bombshell: Over 1,000 Illegal Voters in Eight Virginia Localities', ">>{dthadegbaergae} : Undocumented immigrants* :) We don't believe in borders here on r/politics", '>>{AarushHart} : The US Navy just put a futuristic HUD in a diving helmet', ">>{Taytayswifties} : This is a problem if you can't make your way into the 1%.", ">>{gnar-dar} : It's about time! I worked as a commercial diver for 7 years wearing these exact Kirby Morgan dive helmets and I always wondered why the hell we don't put a sonar feed on a heads up display. SO much bottom time is wasted simply trying to find the worksite, with someone on a radio on surface watching you on a sonar feed and trying to relay it to you.", '>>{Knockaround122} : Honestly thought this was a "Despicable Me" mask of some sort', '>>{forenergypurposes} : Did you... did you read that report? Two conservative groups somehow conclude that ineligible voters being purged from voting lists is indicative of those same ineligible voters being able to vote? Is this what the bottom of the barrel looks like?', ">>{astonishingpants} : Too bad the rabid base he mobilized can't consider the possibility they were had. Its all Obama, intellectuals, Hollywood and the lamestream media's fault. If this strong man doesn't fix everything good in a jiffy, they will just vote for another one- and the next one may not be a comically unprepared oaf.", ">>{TinyBaron} : Why not? It's what happens when one of the 1% gets elected President.", ">>{Fantazy_cow} : Don't worry, leather changes like that. I don't think there is anything you can do to stop it.Here are some images of my red leather case for the iPhone 6s Plus http://imgur.com/a/ikwUe", '>>{fredjonez} : This conservative tea party group had their lawsuit dismissed in Virginia in June about voter fraud and was told not to file again unless they had facts.', ">>{JimTheBeef} : Now we're in trouble, the military have started creating Minions!!", ">>{therealduff1} : That isn't bad at all then! Whys the case got so many bad reviews then about it turning black after a couple weeks ?", ">>{therealduff1} : At least it says it doesn't on the box of the case. The brown ones box says 'this case develops its own patina' but the red one just says'specially tanned and finished leather'", ">>{shapeshiftingrobot} : iPhone SE's overall form factor, but the iPhone 7 Plus for the camera, power, and better speakers.", ">>{paligror} : Call it nostalgia, but nothing will beat the hype for me than the 4s. I rocked that phone until it was beaten and cracked. For the sake of innovation and release, I don't think we'll have another phone release quite like that one.", ">>{ktmkole9} : I had the iPhone 4 and I couldn't agree more until around 2015 when I noticed it was so as fuck compared to other phones so I upgraded to android decided I'd rather have an iPhone 6s and I've been loving my rose gold beauty ever since.", '>>{bassististist} : The man who shits on a golden toilet can really relate to my middle-class struggle.', '>>{starscreamx86} : This is amazing. But I could only think of this. http://66.media.tumblr.com/57183ae69efdb94b49192085e62264b5/tumblr_ml9ycnaGtl1rzv3cwo4_250.gif', ">>{Fantazy_cow} : I have no idea… but I dont mind the darker spots at all. It's a case, of course it isnt going to look brand new for ever.", '>>{paligror} : Dude what hype was anything like the 4s? You might have enjoyed the phones after, but the sheer innovation and jump at the time was ridiculous', '>>{kadupse} : The iPhone 5S was the best looking iPhone ever. It also was a major foundation release, introducing 64 bits and the SEP, it was truly ahead of any competitor. However, I really like the Plus size of newer iPhones.', '>>{PM_ME_YR_O_FACE} : Well, OK, but do we really need Housing and Urban Development on the sea floor?', ">>{Magjee} : They might all be millionaires in a generation once they switch to using RMB's Actually nevermind, they still won't have a net worth over a hundred K", ">>{mdrockwell} : Original iPhone. I waited in line for seven hours to buy it and it felt like magic to me. Ive enjoyed every iPhone I've owned since then, but the original is the only one that had me in awe for months.", ">>{MOVED2DENVER} : I can't wait for November 9th so we no longer have to see Bombshell or BREAKING!", '>>{lizrdgizrd} : With rising sea levels, HUD needs to get in on the ground floor of underwater housing!', ">>{letdogsvote} : This should come as absolutely no surprise. The real question is how long will it take - if ever - for the middle class to struggling Trump voters to realize how badly they've been suckered.", ">>{therealduff1} : Yeah of course. As long as my phone case isn't looking horrible I'm more than happy to use it. I just don't want to look like I've got a £3 when I paid £50 :p", '>>{EvolvingTortoise} : Great, now all they need is a Mountain Dew dispenser in there.', ">>{aj1961} : Has meetings with CEOs from different industries every week. Hasn't met with any labor, education, citizen advocates, etc....", ">>{Baltorussian} : Hm...the only sites carrying this are all fringe-right...Must be a MSM conspiracy not to cover this. Or...it's bullshit.", ">>{mysticportal} : Maybe they didn't mean completely black, but the leather will wear off after a while. I believe there's black plastic underneath. Same goes for any leather product, they'll all get dark eventually. The silicone case is always an option.", '>>{InfamousBrad} : Did any of them actually attempt to vote? No? *yawn*', ">>{therealduff1} : That's true. But I've already returned the brown leather case and got this one😂, will they let me replace it again to a silicone one ?", '>>{Raudskeggr} : My first and only iPhone is the 7 plus. I really love it. However, I like the "Classic" look an awful lot too; esp. the 5s, Which is carried on in the iPhone SE. In terms of prettiness of the design, those phones are stellar. But the big screen and big battery of the Plus makes it the obvious winner.', ">>{Rocko9999} : It's not turning black, its the pigment being worn away. Nothing you can do about it. That is why natural leather is the best color.", ">>{KindaStillDrunk} : It'll make recruiting for a Communist revolution much easier. Accelerationism full speed ahead.", ">>{mysticportal} : Wouldn't hurt to ask. Helps if you make the package look unopened.", '>>{wraithtek} : As reported by... Breitbart and Lifezette? Based on a report by the [Public Interest Legal Foundation](https://publicinterestlegal.org/)? (They aren\'t on Wikipedia, that I\'ve found.) But you can see who\'s on [their Board of Directors](https://publicinterestlegal.org/about-us/board-of-directors/). * "He is the author of the New York Times bestseller Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department..." * "He also serves as legal editor at PJMedia.com, an internet news publication and appears frequently on Fox News and has appeared at National Review, Breitbart, the Washington Examiner, American Spectator, Washington Times and other publications." * "...has been president of the National Organization for Marriage (NOM) since 2011 after having co-founded the organization in 2007 and serving as its first executive director." * "He is the Founding Director of the Constitutional Jurisprudence Clinic, a public interest law firm affiliated with the [Claremont Institute](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claremont_Institute)." * "...as a senior legal fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies." * "He is the co-author with John Fund of the book “Who’s Counting? : How Fraudsters and Bureaucrats Put Your Vote at Risk” (Encounter Books, 2012) and “Obama’s Enforcer: Eric Holder’s Justice Department” (HarperCollins/Broadside June 2014)" * "His analysis and commentary have appeared in The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Times, Politico and Human Events, as well as such outlets as National Review Online and Townhall. His series for PJ Media, “Every Single One,” was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize. He appears regularly on Fox News Channel and on other national and regional TV and radio news outlets."', ">>{_bearly} : I've had a 3G in black, 3GS in black/white, 4 in black, 4s in black, 5 in black, 6 in Space Gray, and 7 in Jet Black. I'd have a really hard time choosing between the 5 and 7.", '>>{_bearly} : Def nostalgia. The 4s was just a spec-bumped iPhone 4 + Siri.', ">>{therealduff1} : Yea the package hasn't changed since I opened it, not damaged the slightest. Il make sure to take it with me :)", '>>{85397} : Yes. What you could also do is return this and buy a silicone one.', '>>{CMDR-Ad-Victoriam} : Bombshell in the title? Article is bullshit, 100% of the time.', '>>{Thisismyfinalstand} : We need so build a sonic fence to keep these damn robots out.', '>>{itsmegeorge} : My favourite is the 4S, followed by the 6S. My least favourite is the 5C. I hated it when I had it.', ">>{EmpatheticBankRobber} : It'll trickle down any day now. Any day now.", ">>{deathsnuggle} : It looks a little funky, I don't really mind leather darkening but the splotches don't look that great. I'm noticing mine is getting ugly in places of wear.", '>>{Bumbaclot7} : put the phone down, go outside for a walk, get a life.', ">>{BroLil} : I don't have a leather case, but I've always liked the way they age. It gives your phone some character!", '>>{TheSmokey1} : >offering divers sonar data, photographs of what they might be looking for As long as it isn\'t "photographs of what they\'re looking at".... Diver 1: "Hey Bob, come look at this cool rock over here." Diver 2: "That\'s not a rock man, that\'s a giant isopod!" Diver 1: *picture pops up on HUD* "GTF BACK TO THE SHIP!"', ">>{charcoalist} : 'But terrorists, and at least Trump is doing sumthin' /s", '>>{wavescrashover} : This article links to a report on the investigation. The report is at this link: https://publicinterestlegal.org/files/Report_Alien-Invasion-in-Virginia.pdf If you scroll down quite a bit, you\'ll come across this little bit of info: "In the 8 jurisdictions that provided us with lists of aliens recently removed from their voter rolls, we discovered that 31 non-citizens" voted between 2005 and 2015. Not quite the "bombshell" they lead you to believe with the headline and article content. But hey... it\'s all about the narrative.', ">>{IsaoraAK} : Stop cleaning it. These are not supposed to be cleaned. You will never maintain a new look with the leather cases. They will all get the worn in patina over time. So pick one that either hides it (Black, midnight blue), or one that looks great with it (Saddle Brown). If you don't like the above, and want a brand new looking case, you chose the wrong product. Some people have used a silicone spray protectant to elongate the life of the new look, but cleaning will certainly remove the dye.", ">>{Atlanticall} : > I worked as a commercial diver for 7 years wearing these exact Kirby Morgan dive helmets and I always wondered why the hell we don't put a sonar feed on a heads up display. That's what's called a business opportunity.", '>>{mikemac310} : My favorite one will always be the original iPhone. It was a total game changer, and I was a lucky 15 year old who got one just a few months after they were released. That was one of the most unforgettable experiences.', '>>{therealduff1} : Really? I thought it looks just like the silicone one', '>>{Cheeksters-} : 1% here. Eh, kinda Trump is creating a field day. I am at least more optimistic in the market than under Obama. Throwing a few tens of thousands into the market.', ">>{virus200} : It probably won't be used in the fleet for another 20 years. The navy is state of the art so we only use tech that's 20+ years old", ">>{Hitchens_} : Get your dive master cert, then take the ~~$8k~~ $20k(?) class and work on a rig doing grunt work for 2 years, then hope you don't die in the first six weeks; pray you make it to retirement (you probably won't) and therefore probably be best not to have a family either because you'll never see them anyway because you're at work, and then you're dead. You'd be setting fellow humans up for travesty really. Life expectancy for these guys is on the order of weeks. It's something I imagine professional thrill seekers doing rather than intelligent and rational people. Watch https://youtu.be/It4RqhzMzbs My dad could've easily skipped training and went straight to diving after doing deep water demos as an officer deep sea diver, could've made twice as much as he does now. He did not because he has me and my brothers/sister. Instead of dying he helped design and manage the production of the ddg1000. So, you know; if you think you can do that, why not devote that time/effort to something more fulfilling? Not saying the rig rats don't love it but, it's the most dangerous job out there apart from postal work.", '>>{therealduff1} : Thats true. I think i can do an exchange', ">>{tyrionlannister} : I use my right mouse button a lot, and I'm not a millionaire.", ">>{ronmexico314} : That's interesting since they greatly expanded their share of the pie under Obama.", ">>{raouldukesaccomplice} : What worries me is that in four years, these people are going to look around and see that they're no better off and they're going to get pissed and find someone even crazier to vote for.", ">>{clockworm} : They've had enough. They're going in for the kill.", '>>{therealduff1} : Ah ok i see, il try and trade it in for a silicone one then :)', ">>{Singmenohymns} : It would be a waste of money, he'll just spindash over it.", ">>{SlendyTheMan} : No, it feels just like the red leather, however it's black so it doesn't fade, or change colors. You can still scratch it with your nail, but you can rub it out.", '>>{Deeliciousness} : Postal work is the most dangerous job? How exactly?', '>>{Hitchens_} : That was more a joke, but even still https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/federal-eye/wp/2013/09/09/postal-work-among-most-dangerous-civilian-federal-jobs/ And then we have the phrase "going Postal".', ">>{gnar-dar} : I don't recommend it to anyone especially with the oil industry the way it is. The job sounds cool from an outside perspective but there is a lot more to it than the average person thinks of. If you did still want to get more information you can contact a dive school (don't trust anything they say) or dive company around you. Divers Institute of Technology is probably the most well know stateside.", ">>{Dhrakyn} : If they just did it then it isn't futuristic.", ">>{notquite20characters} : Because the mail never stops... it just keeps coming and coming and coming, there's no letup, it's relentless. Everyday it piles up more and more and more, and you gotta get it out, and the more you get it out, the more it keeps coming in, and then the bar code reader breaks -", '>>{Hitchens_} : The risk is not as simple or unfathomable if you will, as you make it sound. >2. CDC Study: 1989 – 1997 An underwater welder’s life expectancy is not the same as your white-collar office worker. Last recorded, welder-divers die at a rate that is 40 times America’s national average. This diver average death rate was researched from the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s article (OSHA’s study) from 1989 – 1997. I go into more detail on this study in this article, but here’s the breakdown: >The corresponding annual death rate of 5 out of approximately 3,000 full-time underwater welders. It touted drowning as the number one cause of death. >Large studies on underwater welders’ life expectancy is still limited due to the small population size in this field. About 5,500 – 7,500 divers work in the United States during any given moment. This number drops during the “offseason” offshore. Let’s look current fatality rates using current occupation population: >6,500 (average US underwater welder population) >6,500 / 3,000 = 2.17 >2.17 X 5 = 11 >Based on old fatality rates and new population statistics, approximately 11 welder-divers die every year. >In addition, underwater welding and commercial diving are listed as a “non-hazardous” profession in the eyes of the government. Their labeling gives little to no incentive for increased regulations and enforcement of those regulations. (if you’re part of a diving union, that’s another matter). http://waterwelders.com/underwater-welder-life-expectancy/', '>>{OnceIsawthisthing} : tl,dr; sonar robot *assists* job FTFY', '>>{offgridsunshine} : Yes but more importantly you will be able to watch cat videos from you tube on your deco stop.', ">>{gnar-dar} : My god! I didn't even think of that! No more mindlessly staring into the abyss for hours on end.", ">>{NotTheBeliever} : Let me guess, you haven't played any AAA games in your life.", ">>{Hark3n} : That's a KM 37, right? Very cool concept.", ">>{CarryNoWeight} : Don't you see? You are a real boy David", '>>{ohmegaman} : You should let someone in the industry with experience answer that question because you obviously know fuckall to what you think you do. Life expectancy on the order of weeks? Stopped taking anything you said seriously after that.', ">>{regalager1986} : Don't you love it how the Navy refers to America and not anybody else?", ">>{boobonk} : I'm pissed that HUDs aren't a thing in motorcycle helmets yet.", '>>{coolfir3pwnz} : What sort of degree do I have to get to be on a development team like this?', '>>{T4blespoon} : Why would they use this technology for going underwater when it can clearly be used for battle like master chief?', '>>{AcousticDan} : When other Naval forces get as big and as important, then we can change. Also, it literally says US Navy in the title.', '>>{JourneymanWelder} : were they trying to make it ugly as sin?', ">>{IDarealMVP} : I'm gonna look sick wearing that shit on my motorcycle", ">>{smokemarajuana} : I don't like the anagram DAVD. It sounds like HALs younger brother.", '>>{gucciswag570} : What else do you have on heads up display besides the sonar feed?', '>>{killrwr} : It would be pretty cool if it had a HUD for oxygen levels too, I wonder if they would ever put this into the consumer market?', '>>{classicspaceman} : Does anyone else think it looks like a minion head?', ">>{ActuallyBDL} : We got that Skully helmet. It'll be nicer when displays let us show data like in video games and span the whole FOV", '>>{offgridsunshine} : Saying that the guy running the coms would no doubt be beaming you Barney the fucking dinosaur or gay porn.', '>>{The_Dapper_Badger} : I work with the guy that designed these for the SEALS about 10 years ago. Really awesome system that has huge potential. They used it to navigate, have pop-up schematics for underwater work (especially for EOD teams) and for a whole bunch of other things.', ">>{boobonk} : > Skully helmet That's actually pretty fucking sweet. Hadn't heard about that yet. I did see that if the bike supports it, it'll give you what I'm after, which is basically the entire dashboard. I wonder how many can actually send that data to this thing, though.", '>>{gnar-dar} : sadly the entire diving industry in the US is stuck in 1970 technology wise. There is a lot of stubbornness in changing "the way its been done for years." Even with this tech now available, it will be years before the Gulf of Mexico adopts it (if ever). We had a saturation system shipped to our company from oversees and my company ripped all the state of the art TVs out because higher ups in the company, "didn\'t have TVs in SAT when I was a diver." Sad...', ">>{Sepiroth89} : How on earth did they coin the term DAVD. Shouldn't it be DARD?", '>>{gnar-dar} : ummm.... that moment when you shift and your weight belt lets the hot water flow to your lower body. bliss', '>>{PVP_in_your_pants} : But what other acronym could we use for **D**ivers **A**ugmented **R**eality **D**isplay??', '>>{misconstrudel} : I made another comment here but it seems to be invisible....', ">>{nayhem_jr} : I hear there's another prototype with an abstract display.", ">>{Rocket_Fiend} : **D**iver's **A**ugmented **R**eality **D**isplay, or **'DAVD'** for short...   Guess **DARD** didn't do it for them...", ">>{outpost5} : ~~The Divers Augmented Reality Display, or DAVD for short.~~ The Divers Augmented Reality Expierence, or DAVE for short. I'm sorry DAVE can not do that for you.", '>>{BizzyM} : If they don\'t nickname that the "Minion Mask", I\'ll be very disappointed.', ">>{dasmith87} : Looks like one of Gru's Minions from Despicable Me if they made an appearance in BioShock.", '>>{JohnGillnitz} : Super expensive HUD diving helmet. Still have to spit in it.', '>>{JohnGillnitz} : Only if the helmet can find the Blue Fairy.', '>>{i3-4160} : I\'m really grateful they let us know this *just* happened! If the word "just" wasn\'t in the title, silly old me probably would have though this was a news article from some time other than recently! I don\'t read news from the past!', '>>{Drucifer89} : Misread as "Driving helmet" at first, and was baffled lol', ">>{Mr_Bun_Buns} : Good because I'm getting tired of playing my life in hardcore mode.", ">>{MSPRU} : I'm a commercial diver and have been for 4 years now. I own a Kirby Morgan 57 and highly doubt this will make a splash in the commercial world. Most companies are cheap. I work in very bad visibility water sometimes where you can't even see your hand in front of you cleaning 35' trash racks at a nuclear power site, I also clean all Navy vessels on the east coast. As cool as this sounds I don't see going far out of the Navy or even far in the Navy for that matter. Navy divers I've worked around have not impressed me much with the gear they use. I see this as an experiment and for maybe more usage for deep saturation diving, nothing inland.", ">>{MSPRU} : I beg to differ, I work with guys who have been diving for 25+ years. One guy I work with owns the Guinness book of world records for hours in a diving helmet which is over 26,000 hours. He's over 60", '>>{Kyuui13} : Kirk, he needs him... just ask him.', ">>{smokemarajuana} : Augmented Reality Display for Divers? ARDD. I mean, part of me isn't really sure why we need an acronym?", ">>{ActuallyBDL} : I'm not sure what supports it yet. I know it'll give a lot of information off what your phone measures like speed. That way anyone could use the helmet and not have a compatible motorcycle.", '>>{boobonk} : Good point. Much like that Hum thing from Verizon I bet.', '>>{ActuallyBDL} : An OBD-II connected device would be on point. Wish more bikes had it as an option though']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{dirtydevil_riv} : Donald Trump is creating a field day for the 1%', ">>{Taytayswifties} : This is a problem if you can't make your way into the 1%.", ">>{astonishingpants} : Too bad the rabid base he mobilized can't consider the possibility they were had. Its all Obama, intellectuals, Hollywood and the lamestream media's fault. If this strong man doesn't fix everything good in a jiffy, they will just vote for another one- and the next one may not be a comically unprepared oaf.", ">>{TinyBaron} : Why not? It's what happens when one of the 1% gets elected President.", '>>{bassististist} : The man who shits on a golden toilet can really relate to my middle-class struggle.', ">>{Magjee} : They might all be millionaires in a generation once they switch to using RMB's Actually nevermind, they still won't have a net worth over a hundred K", ">>{letdogsvote} : This should come as absolutely no surprise. The real question is how long will it take - if ever - for the middle class to struggling Trump voters to realize how badly they've been suckered.", ">>{aj1961} : Has meetings with CEOs from different industries every week. Hasn't met with any labor, education, citizen advocates, etc....", ">>{KindaStillDrunk} : It'll make recruiting for a Communist revolution much easier. Accelerationism full speed ahead.", ">>{EmpatheticBankRobber} : It'll trickle down any day now. Any day now.", ">>{charcoalist} : 'But terrorists, and at least Trump is doing sumthin' /s", '>>{Cheeksters-} : 1% here. Eh, kinda Trump is creating a field day. I am at least more optimistic in the market than under Obama. Throwing a few tens of thousands into the market.', ">>{tyrionlannister} : I use my right mouse button a lot, and I'm not a millionaire.", ">>{ronmexico314} : That's interesting since they greatly expanded their share of the pie under Obama.", ">>{raouldukesaccomplice} : What worries me is that in four years, these people are going to look around and see that they're no better off and they're going to get pissed and find someone even crazier to vote for.", ">>{clockworm} : They've had enough. They're going in for the kill."], ['>>{AarushHart} : The US Navy just put a futuristic HUD in a diving helmet', ">>{gnar-dar} : It's about time! I worked as a commercial diver for 7 years wearing these exact Kirby Morgan dive helmets and I always wondered why the hell we don't put a sonar feed on a heads up display. SO much bottom time is wasted simply trying to find the worksite, with someone on a radio on surface watching you on a sonar feed and trying to relay it to you.", '>>{Knockaround122} : Honestly thought this was a "Despicable Me" mask of some sort', ">>{JimTheBeef} : Now we're in trouble, the military have started creating Minions!!", '>>{starscreamx86} : This is amazing. But I could only think of this. http://66.media.tumblr.com/57183ae69efdb94b49192085e62264b5/tumblr_ml9ycnaGtl1rzv3cwo4_250.gif', '>>{PM_ME_YR_O_FACE} : Well, OK, but do we really need Housing and Urban Development on the sea floor?', '>>{lizrdgizrd} : With rising sea levels, HUD needs to get in on the ground floor of underwater housing!', '>>{EvolvingTortoise} : Great, now all they need is a Mountain Dew dispenser in there.', '>>{Thisismyfinalstand} : We need so build a sonic fence to keep these damn robots out.', '>>{TheSmokey1} : >offering divers sonar data, photographs of what they might be looking for As long as it isn\'t "photographs of what they\'re looking at".... Diver 1: "Hey Bob, come look at this cool rock over here." Diver 2: "That\'s not a rock man, that\'s a giant isopod!" Diver 1: *picture pops up on HUD* "GTF BACK TO THE SHIP!"', ">>{Atlanticall} : > I worked as a commercial diver for 7 years wearing these exact Kirby Morgan dive helmets and I always wondered why the hell we don't put a sonar feed on a heads up display. That's what's called a business opportunity.", ">>{virus200} : It probably won't be used in the fleet for another 20 years. The navy is state of the art so we only use tech that's 20+ years old", ">>{Hitchens_} : Get your dive master cert, then take the ~~$8k~~ $20k(?) class and work on a rig doing grunt work for 2 years, then hope you don't die in the first six weeks; pray you make it to retirement (you probably won't) and therefore probably be best not to have a family either because you'll never see them anyway because you're at work, and then you're dead. You'd be setting fellow humans up for travesty really. Life expectancy for these guys is on the order of weeks. It's something I imagine professional thrill seekers doing rather than intelligent and rational people. Watch https://youtu.be/It4RqhzMzbs My dad could've easily skipped training and went straight to diving after doing deep water demos as an officer deep sea diver, could've made twice as much as he does now. He did not because he has me and my brothers/sister. Instead of dying he helped design and manage the production of the ddg1000. So, you know; if you think you can do that, why not devote that time/effort to something more fulfilling? Not saying the rig rats don't love it but, it's the most dangerous job out there apart from postal work.", ">>{Singmenohymns} : It would be a waste of money, he'll just spindash over it.", '>>{Deeliciousness} : Postal work is the most dangerous job? How exactly?', '>>{Hitchens_} : That was more a joke, but even still https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/federal-eye/wp/2013/09/09/postal-work-among-most-dangerous-civilian-federal-jobs/ And then we have the phrase "going Postal".', ">>{gnar-dar} : I don't recommend it to anyone especially with the oil industry the way it is. The job sounds cool from an outside perspective but there is a lot more to it than the average person thinks of. If you did still want to get more information you can contact a dive school (don't trust anything they say) or dive company around you. Divers Institute of Technology is probably the most well know stateside.", ">>{Dhrakyn} : If they just did it then it isn't futuristic.", ">>{notquite20characters} : Because the mail never stops... it just keeps coming and coming and coming, there's no letup, it's relentless. Everyday it piles up more and more and more, and you gotta get it out, and the more you get it out, the more it keeps coming in, and then the bar code reader breaks -", '>>{Hitchens_} : The risk is not as simple or unfathomable if you will, as you make it sound. >2. CDC Study: 1989 – 1997 An underwater welder’s life expectancy is not the same as your white-collar office worker. Last recorded, welder-divers die at a rate that is 40 times America’s national average. This diver average death rate was researched from the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s article (OSHA’s study) from 1989 – 1997. I go into more detail on this study in this article, but here’s the breakdown: >The corresponding annual death rate of 5 out of approximately 3,000 full-time underwater welders. It touted drowning as the number one cause of death. >Large studies on underwater welders’ life expectancy is still limited due to the small population size in this field. About 5,500 – 7,500 divers work in the United States during any given moment. This number drops during the “offseason” offshore. Let’s look current fatality rates using current occupation population: >6,500 (average US underwater welder population) >6,500 / 3,000 = 2.17 >2.17 X 5 = 11 >Based on old fatality rates and new population statistics, approximately 11 welder-divers die every year. >In addition, underwater welding and commercial diving are listed as a “non-hazardous” profession in the eyes of the government. Their labeling gives little to no incentive for increased regulations and enforcement of those regulations. (if you’re part of a diving union, that’s another matter). http://waterwelders.com/underwater-welder-life-expectancy/', '>>{OnceIsawthisthing} : tl,dr; sonar robot *assists* job FTFY', '>>{offgridsunshine} : Yes but more importantly you will be able to watch cat videos from you tube on your deco stop.', ">>{gnar-dar} : My god! I didn't even think of that! No more mindlessly staring into the abyss for hours on end.", ">>{NotTheBeliever} : Let me guess, you haven't played any AAA games in your life.", ">>{Hark3n} : That's a KM 37, right? Very cool concept.", ">>{CarryNoWeight} : Don't you see? You are a real boy David", '>>{ohmegaman} : You should let someone in the industry with experience answer that question because you obviously know fuckall to what you think you do. Life expectancy on the order of weeks? Stopped taking anything you said seriously after that.', ">>{regalager1986} : Don't you love it how the Navy refers to America and not anybody else?", ">>{boobonk} : I'm pissed that HUDs aren't a thing in motorcycle helmets yet.", '>>{coolfir3pwnz} : What sort of degree do I have to get to be on a development team like this?', '>>{T4blespoon} : Why would they use this technology for going underwater when it can clearly be used for battle like master chief?', '>>{AcousticDan} : When other Naval forces get as big and as important, then we can change. Also, it literally says US Navy in the title.', '>>{JourneymanWelder} : were they trying to make it ugly as sin?', ">>{IDarealMVP} : I'm gonna look sick wearing that shit on my motorcycle", ">>{smokemarajuana} : I don't like the anagram DAVD. It sounds like HALs younger brother.", '>>{gucciswag570} : What else do you have on heads up display besides the sonar feed?', '>>{killrwr} : It would be pretty cool if it had a HUD for oxygen levels too, I wonder if they would ever put this into the consumer market?', '>>{classicspaceman} : Does anyone else think it looks like a minion head?', ">>{ActuallyBDL} : We got that Skully helmet. It'll be nicer when displays let us show data like in video games and span the whole FOV", '>>{offgridsunshine} : Saying that the guy running the coms would no doubt be beaming you Barney the fucking dinosaur or gay porn.', '>>{The_Dapper_Badger} : I work with the guy that designed these for the SEALS about 10 years ago. Really awesome system that has huge potential. They used it to navigate, have pop-up schematics for underwater work (especially for EOD teams) and for a whole bunch of other things.', ">>{boobonk} : > Skully helmet That's actually pretty fucking sweet. Hadn't heard about that yet. I did see that if the bike supports it, it'll give you what I'm after, which is basically the entire dashboard. I wonder how many can actually send that data to this thing, though.", '>>{gnar-dar} : sadly the entire diving industry in the US is stuck in 1970 technology wise. There is a lot of stubbornness in changing "the way its been done for years." Even with this tech now available, it will be years before the Gulf of Mexico adopts it (if ever). We had a saturation system shipped to our company from oversees and my company ripped all the state of the art TVs out because higher ups in the company, "didn\'t have TVs in SAT when I was a diver." Sad...', ">>{Sepiroth89} : How on earth did they coin the term DAVD. Shouldn't it be DARD?", '>>{gnar-dar} : ummm.... that moment when you shift and your weight belt lets the hot water flow to your lower body. bliss', '>>{PVP_in_your_pants} : But what other acronym could we use for **D**ivers **A**ugmented **R**eality **D**isplay??', '>>{misconstrudel} : I made another comment here but it seems to be invisible....', ">>{nayhem_jr} : I hear there's another prototype with an abstract display.", ">>{Rocket_Fiend} : **D**iver's **A**ugmented **R**eality **D**isplay, or **'DAVD'** for short...   Guess **DARD** didn't do it for them...", ">>{outpost5} : ~~The Divers Augmented Reality Display, or DAVD for short.~~ The Divers Augmented Reality Expierence, or DAVE for short. I'm sorry DAVE can not do that for you.", '>>{BizzyM} : If they don\'t nickname that the "Minion Mask", I\'ll be very disappointed.', ">>{dasmith87} : Looks like one of Gru's Minions from Despicable Me if they made an appearance in BioShock.", '>>{JohnGillnitz} : Super expensive HUD diving helmet. Still have to spit in it.', '>>{JohnGillnitz} : Only if the helmet can find the Blue Fairy.', '>>{i3-4160} : I\'m really grateful they let us know this *just* happened! If the word "just" wasn\'t in the title, silly old me probably would have though this was a news article from some time other than recently! I don\'t read news from the past!', '>>{Drucifer89} : Misread as "Driving helmet" at first, and was baffled lol', ">>{Mr_Bun_Buns} : Good because I'm getting tired of playing my life in hardcore mode.", ">>{MSPRU} : I'm a commercial diver and have been for 4 years now. I own a Kirby Morgan 57 and highly doubt this will make a splash in the commercial world. Most companies are cheap. I work in very bad visibility water sometimes where you can't even see your hand in front of you cleaning 35' trash racks at a nuclear power site, I also clean all Navy vessels on the east coast. As cool as this sounds I don't see going far out of the Navy or even far in the Navy for that matter. Navy divers I've worked around have not impressed me much with the gear they use. I see this as an experiment and for maybe more usage for deep saturation diving, nothing inland.", ">>{MSPRU} : I beg to differ, I work with guys who have been diving for 25+ years. One guy I work with owns the Guinness book of world records for hours in a diving helmet which is over 26,000 hours. He's over 60", '>>{Kyuui13} : Kirk, he needs him... just ask him.', ">>{smokemarajuana} : Augmented Reality Display for Divers? ARDD. I mean, part of me isn't really sure why we need an acronym?", ">>{ActuallyBDL} : I'm not sure what supports it yet. I know it'll give a lot of information off what your phone measures like speed. That way anyone could use the helmet and not have a compatible motorcycle.", '>>{boobonk} : Good point. Much like that Hum thing from Verizon I bet.', '>>{ActuallyBDL} : An OBD-II connected device would be on point. Wish more bikes had it as an option though'], ['>>{ktmkole9} : If you guys had to choose which iPhone is your favorite from the first to the last which is it?', ">>{shapeshiftingrobot} : iPhone SE's overall form factor, but the iPhone 7 Plus for the camera, power, and better speakers.", ">>{paligror} : Call it nostalgia, but nothing will beat the hype for me than the 4s. I rocked that phone until it was beaten and cracked. For the sake of innovation and release, I don't think we'll have another phone release quite like that one.", ">>{ktmkole9} : I had the iPhone 4 and I couldn't agree more until around 2015 when I noticed it was so as fuck compared to other phones so I upgraded to android decided I'd rather have an iPhone 6s and I've been loving my rose gold beauty ever since.", '>>{paligror} : Dude what hype was anything like the 4s? You might have enjoyed the phones after, but the sheer innovation and jump at the time was ridiculous', '>>{kadupse} : The iPhone 5S was the best looking iPhone ever. It also was a major foundation release, introducing 64 bits and the SEP, it was truly ahead of any competitor. However, I really like the Plus size of newer iPhones.', ">>{mdrockwell} : Original iPhone. I waited in line for seven hours to buy it and it felt like magic to me. Ive enjoyed every iPhone I've owned since then, but the original is the only one that had me in awe for months.", '>>{Raudskeggr} : My first and only iPhone is the 7 plus. I really love it. However, I like the "Classic" look an awful lot too; esp. the 5s, Which is carried on in the iPhone SE. In terms of prettiness of the design, those phones are stellar. But the big screen and big battery of the Plus makes it the obvious winner.', ">>{_bearly} : I've had a 3G in black, 3GS in black/white, 4 in black, 4s in black, 5 in black, 6 in Space Gray, and 7 in Jet Black. I'd have a really hard time choosing between the 5 and 7.", '>>{_bearly} : Def nostalgia. The 4s was just a spec-bumped iPhone 4 + Siri.', '>>{itsmegeorge} : My favourite is the 4S, followed by the 6S. My least favourite is the 5C. I hated it when I had it.', '>>{mikemac310} : My favorite one will always be the original iPhone. It was a total game changer, and I was a lucky 15 year old who got one just a few months after they were released. That was one of the most unforgettable experiences.'], ['>>{ButlerianJihadist} : Bombshell: Over 1,000 Illegal Voters in Eight Virginia Localities', ">>{dthadegbaergae} : Undocumented immigrants* :) We don't believe in borders here on r/politics", '>>{forenergypurposes} : Did you... did you read that report? Two conservative groups somehow conclude that ineligible voters being purged from voting lists is indicative of those same ineligible voters being able to vote? Is this what the bottom of the barrel looks like?', '>>{fredjonez} : This conservative tea party group had their lawsuit dismissed in Virginia in June about voter fraud and was told not to file again unless they had facts.', ">>{MOVED2DENVER} : I can't wait for November 9th so we no longer have to see Bombshell or BREAKING!", ">>{Baltorussian} : Hm...the only sites carrying this are all fringe-right...Must be a MSM conspiracy not to cover this. Or...it's bullshit.", '>>{InfamousBrad} : Did any of them actually attempt to vote? No? *yawn*', '>>{wraithtek} : As reported by... Breitbart and Lifezette? Based on a report by the [Public Interest Legal Foundation](https://publicinterestlegal.org/)? (They aren\'t on Wikipedia, that I\'ve found.) But you can see who\'s on [their Board of Directors](https://publicinterestlegal.org/about-us/board-of-directors/). * "He is the author of the New York Times bestseller Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department..." * "He also serves as legal editor at PJMedia.com, an internet news publication and appears frequently on Fox News and has appeared at National Review, Breitbart, the Washington Examiner, American Spectator, Washington Times and other publications." * "...has been president of the National Organization for Marriage (NOM) since 2011 after having co-founded the organization in 2007 and serving as its first executive director." * "He is the Founding Director of the Constitutional Jurisprudence Clinic, a public interest law firm affiliated with the [Claremont Institute](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claremont_Institute)." * "...as a senior legal fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies." * "He is the co-author with John Fund of the book “Who’s Counting? : How Fraudsters and Bureaucrats Put Your Vote at Risk” (Encounter Books, 2012) and “Obama’s Enforcer: Eric Holder’s Justice Department” (HarperCollins/Broadside June 2014)" * "His analysis and commentary have appeared in The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Times, Politico and Human Events, as well as such outlets as National Review Online and Townhall. His series for PJ Media, “Every Single One,” was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize. He appears regularly on Fox News Channel and on other national and regional TV and radio news outlets."', '>>{CMDR-Ad-Victoriam} : Bombshell in the title? Article is bullshit, 100% of the time.', '>>{wavescrashover} : This article links to a report on the investigation. The report is at this link: https://publicinterestlegal.org/files/Report_Alien-Invasion-in-Virginia.pdf If you scroll down quite a bit, you\'ll come across this little bit of info: "In the 8 jurisdictions that provided us with lists of aliens recently removed from their voter rolls, we discovered that 31 non-citizens" voted between 2005 and 2015. Not quite the "bombshell" they lead you to believe with the headline and article content. But hey... it\'s all about the narrative.'], [">>{therealduff1} : Just swapped the brown leather iPhone 6S Plus case for the red leather iPhone 6S Plus case as the brown leather one one started getting black dots on it , but I've heard really bad things about the red leather one ... like the red just comes straight off when you clean it.. what should I do ?", ">>{Fantazy_cow} : Don't worry, leather changes like that. I don't think there is anything you can do to stop it.Here are some images of my red leather case for the iPhone 6s Plus http://imgur.com/a/ikwUe", ">>{therealduff1} : That isn't bad at all then! Whys the case got so many bad reviews then about it turning black after a couple weeks ?", ">>{therealduff1} : At least it says it doesn't on the box of the case. The brown ones box says 'this case develops its own patina' but the red one just says'specially tanned and finished leather'", ">>{Fantazy_cow} : I have no idea… but I dont mind the darker spots at all. It's a case, of course it isnt going to look brand new for ever.", ">>{therealduff1} : Yeah of course. As long as my phone case isn't looking horrible I'm more than happy to use it. I just don't want to look like I've got a £3 when I paid £50 :p", ">>{mysticportal} : Maybe they didn't mean completely black, but the leather will wear off after a while. I believe there's black plastic underneath. Same goes for any leather product, they'll all get dark eventually. The silicone case is always an option.", ">>{therealduff1} : That's true. But I've already returned the brown leather case and got this one😂, will they let me replace it again to a silicone one ?", ">>{Rocko9999} : It's not turning black, its the pigment being worn away. Nothing you can do about it. That is why natural leather is the best color.", ">>{mysticportal} : Wouldn't hurt to ask. Helps if you make the package look unopened.", ">>{therealduff1} : Yea the package hasn't changed since I opened it, not damaged the slightest. Il make sure to take it with me :)", '>>{85397} : Yes. What you could also do is return this and buy a silicone one.', ">>{deathsnuggle} : It looks a little funky, I don't really mind leather darkening but the splotches don't look that great. I'm noticing mine is getting ugly in places of wear.", '>>{Bumbaclot7} : put the phone down, go outside for a walk, get a life.', ">>{BroLil} : I don't have a leather case, but I've always liked the way they age. It gives your phone some character!", ">>{IsaoraAK} : Stop cleaning it. These are not supposed to be cleaned. You will never maintain a new look with the leather cases. They will all get the worn in patina over time. So pick one that either hides it (Black, midnight blue), or one that looks great with it (Saddle Brown). If you don't like the above, and want a brand new looking case, you chose the wrong product. Some people have used a silicone spray protectant to elongate the life of the new look, but cleaning will certainly remove the dye.", '>>{therealduff1} : Really? I thought it looks just like the silicone one', '>>{therealduff1} : Thats true. I think i can do an exchange', '>>{therealduff1} : Ah ok i see, il try and trade it in for a silicone one then :)', ">>{SlendyTheMan} : No, it feels just like the red leather, however it's black so it doesn't fade, or change colors. You can still scratch it with your nail, but you can rub it out."]]

classify and reply

[">>{Kumoki} : Clinton's Rape Accuser Ignites Against NBC: 'They don't want to go up against him and his machine'", '>>{heuheu} : Is this the one that recanted twice under oath and literally no evidence exists backing her story?', ">>{JustAnotherPerv4u} : World Nut Daily? Didn't they win the Peabody last year?", '>>{Trumppered} : yeah but there\'s some bizarre story of Hillary saying "thank you" to her after she attended a Clinton event after the alleged rape, which everyone swears when you play the audio backwards, Hillary is actually saying "if you speak out I will murder your family"', ">>{Merc_Drew} : We want to investigate the Clintons, we really do... but we also don't want to die of a mysterious suicide!", '>>{FatLadySingin} : [WND](https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/worldnetdaily) is always good for those wanting an *extremely* unique view....', '>>{Kumoki} : umm if you were in the clinton crosshairs you would feel pressure to recant too. Fuck defending the clinton rape machine', '>>{heuheu} : Do you have any evidence that he raped this woman at all?', '>>{heuheu} : So you\'re misunderstanding what "listen and believe" means, and that\'s your evidence?', ">>{I_Key_Cars} : Trump's wife says he raped her because she laughed at his wig.", ">>{vexinom} : Holy shit, this is too good. You're using the SPLC to mock another website?", '>>{heelspider} : Why is it worse to be married to someone accused of rape than actually being a person accused of rape?']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{Kumoki} : Clinton's Rape Accuser Ignites Against NBC: 'They don't want to go up against him and his machine'", '>>{heuheu} : Is this the one that recanted twice under oath and literally no evidence exists backing her story?', ">>{JustAnotherPerv4u} : World Nut Daily? Didn't they win the Peabody last year?", '>>{Trumppered} : yeah but there\'s some bizarre story of Hillary saying "thank you" to her after she attended a Clinton event after the alleged rape, which everyone swears when you play the audio backwards, Hillary is actually saying "if you speak out I will murder your family"', ">>{Merc_Drew} : We want to investigate the Clintons, we really do... but we also don't want to die of a mysterious suicide!", '>>{FatLadySingin} : [WND](https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/worldnetdaily) is always good for those wanting an *extremely* unique view....', '>>{Kumoki} : umm if you were in the clinton crosshairs you would feel pressure to recant too. Fuck defending the clinton rape machine', '>>{heuheu} : Do you have any evidence that he raped this woman at all?', '>>{heuheu} : So you\'re misunderstanding what "listen and believe" means, and that\'s your evidence?', ">>{I_Key_Cars} : Trump's wife says he raped her because she laughed at his wig.", ">>{vexinom} : Holy shit, this is too good. You're using the SPLC to mock another website?", '>>{heelspider} : Why is it worse to be married to someone accused of rape than actually being a person accused of rape?']]

classify and reply

['>>{Blackelixer} : 3D Touch is fun. Firmly press on an app on your homepage to give it a go. Then start doing that in multiple areas of the phone to see all what you can do! :)', '>>{conanthecnidarian} : Donald Trump was pretty much the last one to the table calling the GOP out on their plan. But of course he gets all the credit for saying what thousands of people had already said. Do we get 4 years of this propaganda?', '>>{joepo32} : Leave it to Fox to try to give all of the credit to a Republican. Even though most credit should go to the media who blew it up and made it too big of an issue for the GOP to keep it hidden.', '>>{CrankyBear} : After an Immigration Raid, a City’s Students Vanish', '>>{Masstch} : Apparently, surprises may become common in our new world. I thought 2016 had used them all up!', ">>{easye2889} : I think there is a lot of misinformation around this. Hoping this can shed some light. - The reason they are trying to pass this is because the committee apparently is notorious for making accusations without any actual due process. Since there was no real process House members would have no real way to defend themselves until the damage to their reputation is already done resulting in an expensive PR campaign. The committee could also take anonymous tips and leak the information - some suspect these anonymous tips could come from politically motivated sources (aka a republican trying to run and wants to damage their opponents image). In 2006 this was deemed as a necessary evil. - I think it's great that Trump criticized the move - however - he has no real power over House rules and has no way to influence the decision - separation of powers is great that way (or bad depending how you look at it idk?) - This isn't about the ethics committee - this is about the Office of Congressional Ethics which historically has been used to smear democrats - so retooling this committee will actually help democrats since their will be tighter processes and house members can't just use it to air grievances. - Finally - (shameless plug on how terrible the media is) once again we see a media frenzy over a story that has not fully developed and is spun into oblivion misleading many American citizens. When will we be able to once again trust our media to deliver the news and not tell us what we are supposed to think?", ">>{fljk} : I'll have to give that a shot. I just tried it on a couple of apps. It's pretty cool, thanks!", ">>{Blackelixer} : Once you get familiar with it, it makes tasks easier and fast. It's like a shortcut to a area in the app you can access without having to do all the tapping to get there.", ">>{Izor28} : Do they not have schools south of the border? I dont want to pay for illegals' education", '>>{zlackins} : Trump now too toxic for Paul Ryan, Hill GOP', '>>{Blackelixer} : You can also double tap(tap not press) your home button to bring down the screen for "one handed use". With the iPhone 7 you should probably be able to reach the top of the screen anyway :)', '>>{fljk} : Thank you. I\'m glad you clarified. I have been trying to figure out where it says "Double Tap" to perform function, because when I press it it\'s always the task manager.', ">>{Reapka} : Ooooh so that's what it is for. I thought my iOS glitched when I did that", ">>{Ani10} : I'm from Las Cruces, New Mexico and graduated from Mayfield High School and let me tell you guys that the immigration raid in my beautiful hometown is going to cause a lot of issues. Most if not all people that I knew from there knew someone, was, or is an illegal immigrant. Certain areas, especially trailer parks are mainly occupied by low-income illegal immigrants. My sister is a teacher in a primarily bilingual school used to teach Hispanic students both English and Spanish and get them to learn material when English may not be their strongest language and as you can probably imagine a lot of them are illegal students ranging from the ages of 10-14. My sister has lost a lot of students since January because of the immigration raids and has students go back to Mexico because 'we are going to be deported anyway.' As you can imagine this crushes my sister's heart and makes her cry a lot of times as her number of students has dropped astronomically. Las Cruces is hugely effected by President Trump because of a lot of the money and workers in the area are illegal immigrants. It's a main construction, real estate city and well I know many people who are 'illegal.'", ">>{IslamicShibe} : The whole thing is a clusterfuck where apparently the GOP planned this late last night. Good on Trump I suppose, I think this was just testing the waters to see what they can get away with, try to see if Trump was okay with abandoning draining the swamp. Looks like he's passed the test. Most interesting takeaway from the story is how irrelevant the Democrats are now, they have no power, Trump is gonna be fighting the GOP more than the Democrats. And I suspect some blue dog Democrats will side with him more often than some of the crony neocons", '>>{growyurown} : If this guy is too toxic, where does the tea party fall in the spectrum?', '>>{UnHappy_Farmer} : What an obvious fucking set up. They are turning the Federal Government into Reality TV.', ">>{JustGotOffOfTheTrain} : Yeah, I'm sure it's Trump who made the GOP change course. Not the media coverage or the outrage of voters.", '>>{Ani10} : Ciudad Juarez is mainly where the illegal immigrants come from mainly. They came for the violence and insecurity that is happening in Ciudad Juarez.', ">>{Buttocks} : >My sister has lost a lot of students since January because of the immigration raids and has students go back to Mexico because 'we are going to be deported anyways'. Nice. I hope they'll try a legitimate path to citizenship now.", ">>{youtubefactsbot} : >[**175+ iPhone 7 and iOS 10 Tips and Tricks. The Ultimate, Expanded Guide in less than 1 hour! [55:57]**](http://youtu.be/leHRYXOdfds) >>This expanded iPhone 7 tips and tricks guide packs in more than 175 tips in under 1 hour to help you get the best out of Apple's new smartphone. > [*^Video ^Gadgets ^Journal ^(VGJFelix)*](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCY2hV7xJqrGzaQoTyIr5zvw) ^in ^Science ^& ^Technology >*^2,125 ^views ^since ^Jan ^2017* [^bot ^info](/r/youtubefactsbot/wiki/index)", ">>{Ani10} : A lot of the students parents tried coming here legally but it was taking years and well no one wants to send their child to school and never see them again because El Cartel thought it'd be fun to shoot some school, some store, or some nightclub for shits and giggles. I fully support their decision to come to the USA illegally because if my child could be shot down for no reason, and USA is just 10 minutes away. Trust me I would cross the border without a fucking second thought.", ">>{yakovgolyadkin} : >a lot of them are illegal students ranging from the **ages of 10-14.** These are children who are brought here, not children who made the decision to come and made the journey themselves. It's not like they had an option.", '>>{Realizad} : If he appears to be undermining Trump, it would cause a backlash from his party and could hurt his own House candidates who need Trump supporters to come out in November. >Now, party officials tell CNN say they will monitor how bad the fallout will be for Trump - and how he performs at the next two debates - before abandoning him completely.', '>>{SpookyKid94} : Doubt it. Dump Trump, spend all the money they would have spent on his ads on ones for congress. Not like core Trump supporters are numerous enough to impact the general anyway.', '>>{fairbackpacker} : How can people take the Republican shit show seriously anymore? The literal Republican Leader of the House tries as much as he can to never ever mention the Republican candidate in all his media/ social media activities. It is absolutely unprecedented.', ">>{Forestman88} : The damning thing is that Trump wasn't too toxic months ago.", ">>{row_guy} : It's sad that this is what it took. Open racism and sexsim were fine until this.", '>>{Buttocks} : Besides international border law, what other kinds of laws are you cool with disregarding?', ">>{kidkerouac} : Exactly. When a life can be snuffed out in a second, people don't have years to wait. Sounds great in theory that folks take a number and wait patiently in line, but that's just not the reality a lot of people live in.", '>>{Masstch} : On your last point: I hope that we never ever again become complacent to the point that we believe just whatever the media delivers. Thanks mostly to the advent of the internet, we no longer have to \'just believe\' what three old white guys say. I hope we never go back to those "good ol\' days" of Walter telling us "and that\'s the way it is" and us having no other source to back him up.', ">>{ophelia_jones} : Well I don't want to pay for shitty people to drive on public roads, so I'll pretend I'm not paying for your freeway and that my taxes just go to giving kids an education regardless of what their parents did and you can pretend that all of your taxes go toward, idk, buying another attack helicopter or something.", ">>{NuclearFist} : Redditor as of 1 hour ago. Trollers be trollin'", '>>{007meow} : Why did it take five hours? A competently run campaign would have had it out there immediately. I would venture a guess that he himself was resisting and had to be convinced to say something.', '>>{yangsheng104} : The best part of 3D touch is hard pressing the keyboard to use it as a track pad. So easy to navigate through texts', '>>{IslamicShibe} : There was not enough time for the media or outrage to do anything, this happened late last night, only this morning people were learning about it and by 11am Trump had tweeted his disapproval. Had Trump waited a few days this would have definitely caused some massive outrage but he saw it and killed it on sight. Dislike a lot about Trump but credit where credit is due. If you bend your views to side with the bad guy because you oppose the good guy in the situation you will end up being the bad guy.', ">>{Poppinfr3sh} : I've been wondering how I've been activating that! You have my eternal thanks", ">>{TheBKBurger} : There are so many things to learn. I just switched to a 7 Plus a week ago and I'm still learning. My advice, do some research on YouTube. Look up videos like: - Whats on my iPhone 7 - iPhone 7 Tips and Tricks - Best iOS 10 features Stuff like that helped me. Good luck!", ">>{Buttocks} : So they have the ability to walk through the desert with their children, cross the border illegally, get jobs through fraud, enroll their kids in school through fraud, but they can't just move to a different town in Mexico?", ">>{kingp1ng} : I'd also change the 3D touch and home button settings to your own liking. Settings > General > Accessibility. Adjust 3D Touch pressure sensitivity and Home Button pressure sensitivity. iOS apps can be pretty aggressive/annoying when it comes to default notifications so remember to go into settings and tweak them to your liking.", '>>{woolcommerce} : TL;DR: Undocumented immigration is not criminal, is illegal but open to gov\'t discretion, and all infractors still enjoy constitutional protections. This last includes children\'s right to a free public school education. Hello, I wrote this "debate toolkit" to deal with Trump supporters about immigration. It has their basic arguments - and counters against them. I made it free so you can modify/expand it at will. This way it\'s easier to fight back by simply pasting this and referring to whatever section applies. For example, if someone argues that undocumented immigration is a crime, you can refer them to point #1 below. Reliable sources are cited, but all information is very basic and verifiable elsewhere.   **---ANTI-TRUMP DEBATE TOOLKIT: UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRATION---** Arguments by Trump supporters, and their flaws   **1\\. "Illegal immigration is a CRIME, so they should be deported. It\'s that SIMPLE."** **No, it\'s not that simple.** Undocumented migration is NOT a crime – instead, it\'s a civil or administrative violation. It doesn\'t fall under the criminal court system AT ALL. This point is not up for debate anymore. As of 2012, the SCOTUS ruled that “As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain in the United States” (ARIZONA et al. v. UNITED STATES). There is even a non-criminal term for entering the US without papers: it\'s "entry without inspection" (EWI). Notice we don\'t call it "criminal entry" or "national trespassing". https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_v._United_States Further, since “[i]n and of itself, illegal immigration is a civil matter, [this] means it\'s ruled by civil law, not criminal law. Immigration cases are heard in front of an administrative law judge, not a criminal judge.” http://www.providencejournal.com/blogs/20160531/let-me-remind-you-that-illegal-immigration-is-not-crime To this, the stubborn anti-immigrant will shift goalposts, and now insist the below:   **2\\. "Well...if it\'s not criminal, illegal immigration is still ILLEGAL, so they should be DEPORTED!!!"** **Not so fast.** Just because an illegal (but non-criminal) action occurred, it does not mean that the harshest penalties HAVE to be applied. It\'s not a legal necessity. Discretion matters, and it manifests itself through all 3 branches of government:   a. The executive branch can legally "de-prioritize" non-criminal undocumented workers. (Recall, as per #1 above, that they are not criminals at all). Obama did this - and the courts did not overturn it. He also created the DACA program, which (so far) allowed the legal stay of about 750,000 undocumented immigrants.   b. The judicial branch can exercise both discretionary relief and administrative/judicial relief. The conditions for either are complex, but the point is clear. They involve a DUE PROCESS with judiciary discretion to allow for the stay of removable aliens. For example, in February 2017, an immigration judge stopped the deportation of an Ann Arbor father of four. Originally from Jordania, this US person had two convictions for non-violent crimes in the early 2000s. But the judge granted a deportation waiver "[g]iven that the crimes occurred so long ago, and because it seemed evident [his] family would face extreme hardship if he was deported..." The judge also noted the person\'s work ethic as well as his support by hundreds of neighbors. http://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/index.ssf/2017/02/immigration_judge_allows_ann_a.html   c. Finally, the legislative branch has the neatest solution of them all: simply pass a law so that (at least some) immigrants become documented. If someone is so bent about illegality, then legalization would remove his concern. Right? The law can simply provide a path to citizenship, and even require fines to fund other social programs. Anti-immigrants can bicker about the possibility of legalization, but it\'s not a new idea. In fact, Reagan himself offered widespread amnesty to immigrants in 1986 - and the consequences of this amnesty were rather positive, as we will see below. I know: you can tell all of the above to an anti-immigrant, and he may still dig in. Another of his guttural refrains is below.', '>>{JustGotOffOfTheTrain} : This move was in the news last night. I found out about it because Elizabeth Warren talked about it on her Facebook at around 9PM. It was a top story on Reddit within hours.', '>>{woolcommerce} : **3\\. “All this talk of rights is NONSENSE. They are ILLEGAL ALIENS. They do not have OUR rights.”** **Very wrong.** The US Constitution applies to all US persons, including undocumented immigrants. Again, the SCOTUS established this: >“The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution is not confined to the protection of citizens. It says: ’Nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law.’ These provisions are universal in their application to all persons within the territorial jurisdiction, without regard to any differences of race, of color, or nationality; and the equal protection of the laws is a pledge of the protection of equal laws.” (Wong Wing v. United States, 163 U.S. 228 (1896)) The protections extend further – to the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures, and even free public education to all children under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. So, illegal aliens actually have many, if not all, of our constitutional protections. It\'s the law. The below references at least some of the applicable SCOTUS cases: https://maldef.org/truthinimmigration/undocumented_immigrants_do_have_legal3192008/index.html At this point, with his legal ammunition near depletion, the anti-immigrant may retreat into political considerations. Below is something else you may encounter.   **4\\. “Well, that may all be true – but we are a NATION OF LAWS. If we pass amnesty, we will lose that!!!!"** **Literal nonsense, and historically unproven.** First, the argument is nonsense because none of the above points pertain to amnesty – they simply establish that undocumented migrants are not criminal, and are subject to governmental discretion as well as due process. This does not logically derive into amnesty. Further, to argue otherwise is to miss a much broader point: we actually show RESPECT for due process when we recognize the legal rights of immigrants – not when we turn them into legal pariahs. The second problem is that the lawlessness argument is historically unproven. In 1986, Reagan signed the Immigration Reform and Control Act. It actually granted amnesty to illegal aliens who entered before 1982. Yet this legalization did not result in a tidal wave of crime. In fact, it appears that the OPPOSITE occurred – Stanford economist S. Baker discovered that >“[f]ollowing legalization, [there were] national decreases in crime of approximately 2%-6% associated with one percent of the population being legalized, primarily due to a drop in property crimes. This fall in crime is equivalent to 160,000-480,000 fewer crimes committed each year due to legalization.” (Baker, Scott R. "Effects of Immigrant Legalization on Crime †". American Economic Review. 105 (5): 210–213.) I know this is exhausting, but let\'s turn to the anti-immigrant\'s last line of defense. You will notice it\'s essentially an “all-else” argument.', ">>{IslamicShibe} : Yeah well Reddit is not at all representative of voters or else we would have had president Paul then President Sanders (or Clinton). I watch the news all the time, I didn't see it until this morning when Conway was defending it like most Americans. Looks like Trump went against all his advisors on this one which was good", '>>{woolcommerce} : **5\\. "Even if we can grant amnesty without legal troubles, it will negatively affect our nation in other ways."** **Just how?** Let\'s talk crime, economics, and culture.   a. Crime: Above we showed a statistical study which found that Reagan\'s amnesty did LOWER crime rates. But this is actually one study of several that support the same conclusion. Consider that, >"[i]mmigration-crime research over the past 20 years has widely corroborated the conclusions of a number of early 20th-century presidential commissions that found no backing for the immigration-crime connection. Although there are always individual exceptions, the literature demonstrates that immigrants commit fewer crimes, on average, than native-born Americans." https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/immigrants-do-not-increase-crime-research-shows/ Also see: https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/criminalization-immigration-united-states Unlike the hysteria of Trump and his supporters, these studies are actually EMPIRICAL and VERIFIABLE. At least in principle, you can obtain their data and review them, as well as any formal models employed in them. You can even try to replicate them (given enough resources). Perhaps you can say that requires more education than the average American\'s. In that case, the solution is just as simple: get the training and education to investigate complex topics like immigration, and be modest about your knowledge (and your own conclusions) until then.   b. Economics: Here we focus on just two topics: the economic contribution of undocumented immigrants, and their purported usage of public benefits. First, the body of research tends to agree: undocumented immigrants tend to substitute for other low-skill labor, while complementing their higher-skilled counterparts. This is a trade-off, yet the OVERALL national impact is remarkably positive: >"Giovanni Peri, an economist at the University of California, Davis, has written a series of influential papers comparing the labor markets in states with high immigration levels to those with low ones. He concluded that undocumented workers do not compete with skilled laborers — instead, they complement them... In states with more undocumented immigrants, Peri said, skilled workers made more money and worked more hours; the economy’s productivity grew. From 1990 to 2007, undocumented workers increased legal workers’ pay in complementary jobs by up to 10 percent... There are many ways to debate immigration, but when it comes to economics, there isn’t much of a debate at all. Nearly all economists, of all political persuasions, agree that immigrants — those here legally or not — benefit the overall economy. “That is not controversial,” Heidi Shierholz, an economist at the Economic Policy Institute, told me. Shierholz also said that “there is a consensus that, on average, the incomes of families in this country are increased by a small, but clearly positive amount, because of immigration.” http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/17/magazine/do-illegal-immigrants-actually-hurt-the-us-economy.html To be sure, there is still a chance that undocumented immigrants become an economic problem in the future. But this requires us to question our direction as a nation. If we are becoming more educated (and so arguably higher-skilled), then the undocumented laborers will be a further economic boost. If we were instead regressing in our education and skills, then we would all compete for ever lower wages. It\'s fair to say this is NOT happening. The United States is growing into a fuller service and knowledge economy, so the former scenario seems more reasonable. Undocumented laborers help (and will continue to help) our economy. Second, we examine the persistent notion that undocumented immigrants are a drain on the treasury. As with other critiques of immigration, this one also runs afoul of empirics. When the evidence is reviewed, it turns out that undocumented immigrants are not a drain. In fact, they are an added benefit to the treasury. Simply consider that, >"Stephen Goss, chief actuary for the Social Security Administration, [reports] that undocumented workers contribute about $15 billion a year to Social Security through payroll taxes. [Yet, they] only take out $1 billion (very few undocumented workers are eligible to receive benefits). Over the years, undocumented workers have contributed up to $300 billion, or nearly 10 percent, of the $2.7 trillion Social Security Trust Fund... [That said, t]he problem...is that undocumented workers are not evenly distributed. In areas like southern Texas and Arizona and even parts of Brooklyn, undocumented immigrants impose a substantial net cost to local and state governments..." http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/17/magazine/do-illegal-immigrants-actually-hurt-the-us-economy.html So again the problem becomes one of nuance: the gross effect is positive, but there are exceptions. However, when this is the case, the sensible solution is not to consider removing the source of the net benefit (undocumented immigration) in favor of the exceptions. That is like abandoning your house because the windows leak water. (Better to fix them and try to save the house.) This leads us to a debate about sensible immigration reform, which has been the bone of contention until 2016 came along. Note: an anti-immigrant group, the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), had published research showing that undocumented immigration is a net drainage on public benefits. This research was shown to be flawed by the right-leaning Cato Institute - among other things, the CIS did not control for household size and other factors. Cato also informed CIS repeatedly of their methodological flaws, yet they persisted. See the Cato critique here: https://www.cato.org/blog/center-immigration-studies-exaggerates-immigrant-welfare-use (We are almost there. Let\'s turn to the one area that is left in the anti-immigrant\'s rhetorical arsenal.)   c. Culture: This is an area that is rarely expressed by anti-immigrants, and is very telling: why ignore the cultural effects of immigration? It seems so obvious to tackle - and it is here that we may get to the kernel of the issue. First, I offer the obvious pro-immigrant take on culture. Then I turn to its opposition. As a whole, immigration enriches the nation by diversifying its culture. In particular, US culture has done great wonders with the constant influx of diverse immigrants. Most, if not all, of the greatest cultural centers in our nation are places where cultures mix: the Northeast, the West Coast, and South Florida suggest themselves. They are not cesspools of depravity, but cultural cauldrons where artists and scientists alike mix – and where a great social discourse peppers life with myriad contributions. To negate this is to ignore the cultural history of this country. (I leave these claims for others to elaborate.) On the other hand, what are the cultural arguments AGAINST immigration - undocumented and otherwise? One possibility is that immigrants will not integrate. But, large and by, this is proven false. In fact, a 2015 study by the National Academy of Science found that, >"[o]verall...current immigrants and their descendants are integrating into U.S. society...Across all measurable outcomes, integration increases over time, with immigrants becoming more like the native-born with more time in the country, and with the second and third generations becoming more like other native-born Americans than their parents were." http://www.nap.edu/catalog/21746/the-integration-of-immigrants-into-american-society http://books.google.com/books/about/The_Integration_of_Immigrants_Into_Ameri.html?id=LZTRCwAAQBAJ Another study is the Indicators of Immigrant Integration, which compares integration across EU and OECD countries. It also generally rates the US in a positive light with respect to immigrant integration: http://www.oecd.org/migration/indicators-of-immigrant-integration-2015-settling-in-9789264234024-en.htm The above studies, as well as a third one, are also discussed here: http://www.cato.org/blog/great-assimilation-scare In short, there are reputable studies showing that immigrants DO integrate into society. But with the intellectual walls closing in, the stalwart anti-immigrant will still denounce that "American society" is corrupted by new immigrants. No matter the arguments. No matter the evidence. It is at this point that we grant him one small but significant concession: Yes, American society will not remain the same with more immigration. It will invariably change – and that is kind of the whole point. When we allow immigrants, we don\'t only help foster their dreams of America. We help ours as well. High-immigrant cities tend to be hubs of innovation, commerce, and culture. To the degree that we see a better future in those activities, then immigration justifies itself. But if we sacrifice those goals in favor of some fossilized image of America, then the walls are already erected. We do have a choice, and it is powerful. I don\'t hope to change many stubborn minds with this, but I do want to give pro-immigrants the tools to defend their viewpoints. The world is on our side – so is history and the evidence. Let\'s press on.', '>>{JustGotOffOfTheTrain} : Reddit is just a reflection of the fact that the news was out there and being spread. The fact is, this dirty trick by the Republicans was being widely reported and widely criticized. Trump saw the way the wind was blowing and Fox is unfairly giving him credit where no credit is due.', '>>{The_ajc} : Let me also recommend 3D touching the left hand side of the display to quickly change between apps or accessing multitasking faster.', ">>{BedWedOrBehead} : Maybe this will blow over by dinner. We'll wait and see.", '>>{BedWedOrBehead} : > it would cause a backlash from his party and could hurt his own House candidates who need Trump supporters to come out in November. By keeping him they face an even worse time because all indications are that Clinton is going to have a lot more voters showing up.', ">>{Buttocks} : No I'm not. These kids just have bad parents.", '>>{Izor28} : Well im a legal citizen and your taxes are supposed to go to that. These are illegals who have no rights to our money.', ">>{reptile7383} : The last person should get all the credit, right? Maybe if dems were smarter they'd keep quite and be the last person to speak. /s", ">>{BedWedOrBehead} : Doesn't matter where they fall, they all have LifeAlert necklaces. They can just push the little button.", ">>{woolcommerce} : > No I'm not. May your children one day grow up to marry good brown children, be safe and sound, and may your descendants never think about your hate.", ">>{ophelia_jones} : If you think that they have no rights to our money, then I encourage you to point your anger at American businesses who exploit their cheap labor for shitty jobs that Americans won't take pennies for instead of children who are learning how to read.", ">>{IslamicShibe} : The fire was just starting when Trump stomped it out. I don't think it was a dirty trick, I think it was clearly bait to try to see how ethical Trump is and to counter his 'drain the swamp' method. He passed this test, his own party and people in his own administration like Conway pushed him towards the fire and he stepped out of the way. Not only fox is giving him credit BTW, I've seen the same thing posted by AP, NBC", ">>{3_Limes} : I'm calling BS on this. By the time Tuesday rolls around they'll still be 'supporting the nominee', as will 99% of the GOP and 99% of Trump's base. They'll find some course of thinking that justifies continued support. And if that doesn't work they'll just go with denial.", '>>{Gargatua13013} : > They\'ll find some course of thinking that justifies continued support. "*A force d\'avaler quelques couleuvres, on finit par les avaler toutes*" Tr: "*You start by swallowing a few snakes, eventually you end up swallowing them all*" ... Antigone, Jean Anouilh', '>>{Gargatua13013} : Heh! Now *there\'s* an objective measure of the moral flexibility of the Republican party: "*Now, party officials tell CNN say they will monitor how bad the fallout will be for Trump -- and how he performs at the next two debates -- before abandoning him completely.*" They\'ll support him to the bitter end, unless he cannot garner electoral support and "the fallout is too bad". So much for the party of family values...', '>>{sprcow} : If I were involved in the Trump campaign, I think I would make him produce apology videos on a variety of topics in advance, just to reduce the turnaround time here.', '>>{AbraKedavra} : Is anyone else sad that the default action for apps that don\'t have 3D Touch is now "Share this app"? The old 3D Touch haptic vibration for an app that didn\'t have a 3D Touch shortcut was so pleasant feeling.', '>>{abhikurve2} : Is there any Jailbreak tweak to set double team to bring up the multitask menu?', '>>{Buttocks} : >May your children one day grow up to marry good brown children, and may your descendants never think about your hate. As if all illegal immigrants are brown people. Your racism is showing! Also, how is it hateful to want people to immigrate legally?', ">>{kims681} : I haven't read the comments but I'll give you some things (I came from a Note7 to 6S Plus) On the keyboard, you can apply pressure to move the cursor in the text box I upload my photos to Google Photos for unlimited uploads In iMessage, you can apply pressure to the send button to turn on sending options, such as laser. I disabled my press to unlock on the home screen so I could just press the home button from sleep mode to unlock it. I also accessed the camera options in setting and enabled 1080p 60fps for good looking videos.", ">>{TrumpSuxRussianDick} : Fuck that, America is for *all people.* Being born here doesn't make you special. I guarantee you those students are far more American than you'll ever be.", ">>{TrumpSuxRussianDick} : Agreed. Mexico is a shit hole, and fixing it and turning it into a prosperous country would take a lot of time and effort. It'd far easier to just come to America. Besides, Americans never had to do that, by the time they arrived here the Native Americans had already built a progressive, prosperous nation. Americans have never had to truly work for anything or create a society. We shouldn't expect the citizens of other nations to do so either.", ">>{zone23} : iPhones have a lot of hidden features it can take a while to really find them. I know android users don't see it at first but when you really need to get something done you will find them. Photo app press a little harder on a photo it will open to a bigger view. Recent notifications press harder on the 'x' for clear all. Text notification on lockscreen press on it to reply.", ">>{TrumpSuxRussianDick} : You seem to think it isn't our duty as humans and Americans to take care of the rest of the world.", ">>{jaysrapsleafs} : all these trump supporters think immigrating to the US is as easy as rolling out of bed. Wht they don't realize it's basically impossible for the average mexican to immigrate to the US unless they're married to an american.", ">>{TrumpSuxRussianDick} : Finally, some common sense. My daughter was hungry two nights ago, and I had spent all of her food money on gambling. So I went out and beat the shit out of some old lady and stole her purse. She had a few hundred bucks in it, and I was able to buy my daughter a chicken sandwich from Carl's Jr. as well as have some cash left over for the casino. Do I want to live like this? Fuck no, but I have to keep my daughter safe.", ">>{fljk} : I will be checking those out. Sometimes it's hard sifting through the useful videos and ones that show basic stuff. Thanks for the ideas.", '>>{TrumpSuxRussianDick} : First they came for the Hispanics.. and I did not speak out because I was not Hispanic.. Then they came for the women.. and I did not speak out because I was not a woman.. Then they came for the African Americans.. and I did not speak out because I was not an African American.. Then they came for the jihadists.. and I did not speak out because I was not a jihadist.. Then they came for me.. and there was no one left to speak for me..', ">>{Swimwithamermaid} : Cartels don't only terrorize certain cities in Mexico. Not only that but Mexico is not like America where we can pick up and leave and for sure find work somewhere else. People there have limited education and limited work opportunities. Most are farmers and cattle ranchers, pretty hard to just pick that up and move somewhere else. Also remember cartels like to threaten people, wouldn't put it past them to force a family to stay in their home/town so they can use them.", '>>{Izor28} : Not really. They should be punished as well but first we need to get the illegals out and secure the border.', ">>{fljk} : The pressure on the text box thing is really useful. I was looking for this feature earlier. It is nice that it is out of the way so you can actually see where you're moving the cursor. It used to get pretty annoying being able to move the cursor but my finger was always in the way.", ">>{churm91} : Yeah it's almost like there's a REASON it's that way. Hmmmm", '>>{fljk} : iPhones have definitely come a long way since I have used one last. Overall I am happy with the switch. I keep finding little features like this as I use it more and more and it makes things a lot easier.', '>>{fljk} : I have been looking for this feature. Thank you!', ">>{jaysrapsleafs} : not really, cuz there's plenty of jobs for them we know Americans won't do. give em a legal pathway and stop whining.", '>>{woolcommerce} : Ok, Adolph. Plausible deniability much? And enjoy the last days of your traitor president.', ">>{Buttocks} : >Being born here doesn't make you special. Being born here makes you an American citizen... >I guarantee you those students are far more American than you'll ever be. That's literally impossible.", '>>{epchipko} : This really seems to be the Trump strategy. Keep the fear and uncertainty level dialed up enough to satisfy the base supporters of this and avoid the expenses of actually doing something effective while hoping these people self-deport. I doubt it will be particularly effective unless the only goal is cruelty.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{Blackelixer} : 3D Touch is fun. Firmly press on an app on your homepage to give it a go. Then start doing that in multiple areas of the phone to see all what you can do! :)', ">>{fljk} : I'll have to give that a shot. I just tried it on a couple of apps. It's pretty cool, thanks!", ">>{Blackelixer} : Once you get familiar with it, it makes tasks easier and fast. It's like a shortcut to a area in the app you can access without having to do all the tapping to get there.", '>>{Blackelixer} : You can also double tap(tap not press) your home button to bring down the screen for "one handed use". With the iPhone 7 you should probably be able to reach the top of the screen anyway :)', '>>{fljk} : Thank you. I\'m glad you clarified. I have been trying to figure out where it says "Double Tap" to perform function, because when I press it it\'s always the task manager.', ">>{Reapka} : Ooooh so that's what it is for. I thought my iOS glitched when I did that", ">>{youtubefactsbot} : >[**175+ iPhone 7 and iOS 10 Tips and Tricks. The Ultimate, Expanded Guide in less than 1 hour! [55:57]**](http://youtu.be/leHRYXOdfds) >>This expanded iPhone 7 tips and tricks guide packs in more than 175 tips in under 1 hour to help you get the best out of Apple's new smartphone. > [*^Video ^Gadgets ^Journal ^(VGJFelix)*](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCY2hV7xJqrGzaQoTyIr5zvw) ^in ^Science ^& ^Technology >*^2,125 ^views ^since ^Jan ^2017* [^bot ^info](/r/youtubefactsbot/wiki/index)", '>>{yangsheng104} : The best part of 3D touch is hard pressing the keyboard to use it as a track pad. So easy to navigate through texts', ">>{Poppinfr3sh} : I've been wondering how I've been activating that! You have my eternal thanks", ">>{TheBKBurger} : There are so many things to learn. I just switched to a 7 Plus a week ago and I'm still learning. My advice, do some research on YouTube. Look up videos like: - Whats on my iPhone 7 - iPhone 7 Tips and Tricks - Best iOS 10 features Stuff like that helped me. Good luck!", ">>{kingp1ng} : I'd also change the 3D touch and home button settings to your own liking. Settings > General > Accessibility. Adjust 3D Touch pressure sensitivity and Home Button pressure sensitivity. iOS apps can be pretty aggressive/annoying when it comes to default notifications so remember to go into settings and tweak them to your liking.", '>>{The_ajc} : Let me also recommend 3D touching the left hand side of the display to quickly change between apps or accessing multitasking faster.', '>>{AbraKedavra} : Is anyone else sad that the default action for apps that don\'t have 3D Touch is now "Share this app"? The old 3D Touch haptic vibration for an app that didn\'t have a 3D Touch shortcut was so pleasant feeling.', '>>{abhikurve2} : Is there any Jailbreak tweak to set double team to bring up the multitask menu?', ">>{kims681} : I haven't read the comments but I'll give you some things (I came from a Note7 to 6S Plus) On the keyboard, you can apply pressure to move the cursor in the text box I upload my photos to Google Photos for unlimited uploads In iMessage, you can apply pressure to the send button to turn on sending options, such as laser. I disabled my press to unlock on the home screen so I could just press the home button from sleep mode to unlock it. I also accessed the camera options in setting and enabled 1080p 60fps for good looking videos.", ">>{zone23} : iPhones have a lot of hidden features it can take a while to really find them. I know android users don't see it at first but when you really need to get something done you will find them. Photo app press a little harder on a photo it will open to a bigger view. Recent notifications press harder on the 'x' for clear all. Text notification on lockscreen press on it to reply.", ">>{fljk} : I will be checking those out. Sometimes it's hard sifting through the useful videos and ones that show basic stuff. Thanks for the ideas.", ">>{fljk} : The pressure on the text box thing is really useful. I was looking for this feature earlier. It is nice that it is out of the way so you can actually see where you're moving the cursor. It used to get pretty annoying being able to move the cursor but my finger was always in the way.", '>>{fljk} : iPhones have definitely come a long way since I have used one last. Overall I am happy with the switch. I keep finding little features like this as I use it more and more and it makes things a lot easier.', '>>{fljk} : I have been looking for this feature. Thank you!'], ['>>{CrankyBear} : After an Immigration Raid, a City’s Students Vanish', ">>{Izor28} : Do they not have schools south of the border? I dont want to pay for illegals' education", ">>{Ani10} : I'm from Las Cruces, New Mexico and graduated from Mayfield High School and let me tell you guys that the immigration raid in my beautiful hometown is going to cause a lot of issues. Most if not all people that I knew from there knew someone, was, or is an illegal immigrant. Certain areas, especially trailer parks are mainly occupied by low-income illegal immigrants. My sister is a teacher in a primarily bilingual school used to teach Hispanic students both English and Spanish and get them to learn material when English may not be their strongest language and as you can probably imagine a lot of them are illegal students ranging from the ages of 10-14. My sister has lost a lot of students since January because of the immigration raids and has students go back to Mexico because 'we are going to be deported anyway.' As you can imagine this crushes my sister's heart and makes her cry a lot of times as her number of students has dropped astronomically. Las Cruces is hugely effected by President Trump because of a lot of the money and workers in the area are illegal immigrants. It's a main construction, real estate city and well I know many people who are 'illegal.'", '>>{Ani10} : Ciudad Juarez is mainly where the illegal immigrants come from mainly. They came for the violence and insecurity that is happening in Ciudad Juarez.', ">>{Buttocks} : >My sister has lost a lot of students since January because of the immigration raids and has students go back to Mexico because 'we are going to be deported anyways'. Nice. I hope they'll try a legitimate path to citizenship now.", ">>{Ani10} : A lot of the students parents tried coming here legally but it was taking years and well no one wants to send their child to school and never see them again because El Cartel thought it'd be fun to shoot some school, some store, or some nightclub for shits and giggles. I fully support their decision to come to the USA illegally because if my child could be shot down for no reason, and USA is just 10 minutes away. Trust me I would cross the border without a fucking second thought.", ">>{yakovgolyadkin} : >a lot of them are illegal students ranging from the **ages of 10-14.** These are children who are brought here, not children who made the decision to come and made the journey themselves. It's not like they had an option.", '>>{Buttocks} : Besides international border law, what other kinds of laws are you cool with disregarding?', ">>{kidkerouac} : Exactly. When a life can be snuffed out in a second, people don't have years to wait. Sounds great in theory that folks take a number and wait patiently in line, but that's just not the reality a lot of people live in.", ">>{ophelia_jones} : Well I don't want to pay for shitty people to drive on public roads, so I'll pretend I'm not paying for your freeway and that my taxes just go to giving kids an education regardless of what their parents did and you can pretend that all of your taxes go toward, idk, buying another attack helicopter or something.", ">>{NuclearFist} : Redditor as of 1 hour ago. Trollers be trollin'", ">>{Buttocks} : So they have the ability to walk through the desert with their children, cross the border illegally, get jobs through fraud, enroll their kids in school through fraud, but they can't just move to a different town in Mexico?", '>>{woolcommerce} : TL;DR: Undocumented immigration is not criminal, is illegal but open to gov\'t discretion, and all infractors still enjoy constitutional protections. This last includes children\'s right to a free public school education. Hello, I wrote this "debate toolkit" to deal with Trump supporters about immigration. It has their basic arguments - and counters against them. I made it free so you can modify/expand it at will. This way it\'s easier to fight back by simply pasting this and referring to whatever section applies. For example, if someone argues that undocumented immigration is a crime, you can refer them to point #1 below. Reliable sources are cited, but all information is very basic and verifiable elsewhere.   **---ANTI-TRUMP DEBATE TOOLKIT: UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRATION---** Arguments by Trump supporters, and their flaws   **1\\. "Illegal immigration is a CRIME, so they should be deported. It\'s that SIMPLE."** **No, it\'s not that simple.** Undocumented migration is NOT a crime – instead, it\'s a civil or administrative violation. It doesn\'t fall under the criminal court system AT ALL. This point is not up for debate anymore. As of 2012, the SCOTUS ruled that “As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain in the United States” (ARIZONA et al. v. UNITED STATES). There is even a non-criminal term for entering the US without papers: it\'s "entry without inspection" (EWI). Notice we don\'t call it "criminal entry" or "national trespassing". https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_v._United_States Further, since “[i]n and of itself, illegal immigration is a civil matter, [this] means it\'s ruled by civil law, not criminal law. Immigration cases are heard in front of an administrative law judge, not a criminal judge.” http://www.providencejournal.com/blogs/20160531/let-me-remind-you-that-illegal-immigration-is-not-crime To this, the stubborn anti-immigrant will shift goalposts, and now insist the below:   **2\\. "Well...if it\'s not criminal, illegal immigration is still ILLEGAL, so they should be DEPORTED!!!"** **Not so fast.** Just because an illegal (but non-criminal) action occurred, it does not mean that the harshest penalties HAVE to be applied. It\'s not a legal necessity. Discretion matters, and it manifests itself through all 3 branches of government:   a. The executive branch can legally "de-prioritize" non-criminal undocumented workers. (Recall, as per #1 above, that they are not criminals at all). Obama did this - and the courts did not overturn it. He also created the DACA program, which (so far) allowed the legal stay of about 750,000 undocumented immigrants.   b. The judicial branch can exercise both discretionary relief and administrative/judicial relief. The conditions for either are complex, but the point is clear. They involve a DUE PROCESS with judiciary discretion to allow for the stay of removable aliens. For example, in February 2017, an immigration judge stopped the deportation of an Ann Arbor father of four. Originally from Jordania, this US person had two convictions for non-violent crimes in the early 2000s. But the judge granted a deportation waiver "[g]iven that the crimes occurred so long ago, and because it seemed evident [his] family would face extreme hardship if he was deported..." The judge also noted the person\'s work ethic as well as his support by hundreds of neighbors. http://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/index.ssf/2017/02/immigration_judge_allows_ann_a.html   c. Finally, the legislative branch has the neatest solution of them all: simply pass a law so that (at least some) immigrants become documented. If someone is so bent about illegality, then legalization would remove his concern. Right? The law can simply provide a path to citizenship, and even require fines to fund other social programs. Anti-immigrants can bicker about the possibility of legalization, but it\'s not a new idea. In fact, Reagan himself offered widespread amnesty to immigrants in 1986 - and the consequences of this amnesty were rather positive, as we will see below. I know: you can tell all of the above to an anti-immigrant, and he may still dig in. Another of his guttural refrains is below.', '>>{woolcommerce} : **3\\. “All this talk of rights is NONSENSE. They are ILLEGAL ALIENS. They do not have OUR rights.”** **Very wrong.** The US Constitution applies to all US persons, including undocumented immigrants. Again, the SCOTUS established this: >“The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution is not confined to the protection of citizens. It says: ’Nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law.’ These provisions are universal in their application to all persons within the territorial jurisdiction, without regard to any differences of race, of color, or nationality; and the equal protection of the laws is a pledge of the protection of equal laws.” (Wong Wing v. United States, 163 U.S. 228 (1896)) The protections extend further – to the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures, and even free public education to all children under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. So, illegal aliens actually have many, if not all, of our constitutional protections. It\'s the law. The below references at least some of the applicable SCOTUS cases: https://maldef.org/truthinimmigration/undocumented_immigrants_do_have_legal3192008/index.html At this point, with his legal ammunition near depletion, the anti-immigrant may retreat into political considerations. Below is something else you may encounter.   **4\\. “Well, that may all be true – but we are a NATION OF LAWS. If we pass amnesty, we will lose that!!!!"** **Literal nonsense, and historically unproven.** First, the argument is nonsense because none of the above points pertain to amnesty – they simply establish that undocumented migrants are not criminal, and are subject to governmental discretion as well as due process. This does not logically derive into amnesty. Further, to argue otherwise is to miss a much broader point: we actually show RESPECT for due process when we recognize the legal rights of immigrants – not when we turn them into legal pariahs. The second problem is that the lawlessness argument is historically unproven. In 1986, Reagan signed the Immigration Reform and Control Act. It actually granted amnesty to illegal aliens who entered before 1982. Yet this legalization did not result in a tidal wave of crime. In fact, it appears that the OPPOSITE occurred – Stanford economist S. Baker discovered that >“[f]ollowing legalization, [there were] national decreases in crime of approximately 2%-6% associated with one percent of the population being legalized, primarily due to a drop in property crimes. This fall in crime is equivalent to 160,000-480,000 fewer crimes committed each year due to legalization.” (Baker, Scott R. "Effects of Immigrant Legalization on Crime †". American Economic Review. 105 (5): 210–213.) I know this is exhausting, but let\'s turn to the anti-immigrant\'s last line of defense. You will notice it\'s essentially an “all-else” argument.', '>>{woolcommerce} : **5\\. "Even if we can grant amnesty without legal troubles, it will negatively affect our nation in other ways."** **Just how?** Let\'s talk crime, economics, and culture.   a. Crime: Above we showed a statistical study which found that Reagan\'s amnesty did LOWER crime rates. But this is actually one study of several that support the same conclusion. Consider that, >"[i]mmigration-crime research over the past 20 years has widely corroborated the conclusions of a number of early 20th-century presidential commissions that found no backing for the immigration-crime connection. Although there are always individual exceptions, the literature demonstrates that immigrants commit fewer crimes, on average, than native-born Americans." https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/immigrants-do-not-increase-crime-research-shows/ Also see: https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/criminalization-immigration-united-states Unlike the hysteria of Trump and his supporters, these studies are actually EMPIRICAL and VERIFIABLE. At least in principle, you can obtain their data and review them, as well as any formal models employed in them. You can even try to replicate them (given enough resources). Perhaps you can say that requires more education than the average American\'s. In that case, the solution is just as simple: get the training and education to investigate complex topics like immigration, and be modest about your knowledge (and your own conclusions) until then.   b. Economics: Here we focus on just two topics: the economic contribution of undocumented immigrants, and their purported usage of public benefits. First, the body of research tends to agree: undocumented immigrants tend to substitute for other low-skill labor, while complementing their higher-skilled counterparts. This is a trade-off, yet the OVERALL national impact is remarkably positive: >"Giovanni Peri, an economist at the University of California, Davis, has written a series of influential papers comparing the labor markets in states with high immigration levels to those with low ones. He concluded that undocumented workers do not compete with skilled laborers — instead, they complement them... In states with more undocumented immigrants, Peri said, skilled workers made more money and worked more hours; the economy’s productivity grew. From 1990 to 2007, undocumented workers increased legal workers’ pay in complementary jobs by up to 10 percent... There are many ways to debate immigration, but when it comes to economics, there isn’t much of a debate at all. Nearly all economists, of all political persuasions, agree that immigrants — those here legally or not — benefit the overall economy. “That is not controversial,” Heidi Shierholz, an economist at the Economic Policy Institute, told me. Shierholz also said that “there is a consensus that, on average, the incomes of families in this country are increased by a small, but clearly positive amount, because of immigration.” http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/17/magazine/do-illegal-immigrants-actually-hurt-the-us-economy.html To be sure, there is still a chance that undocumented immigrants become an economic problem in the future. But this requires us to question our direction as a nation. If we are becoming more educated (and so arguably higher-skilled), then the undocumented laborers will be a further economic boost. If we were instead regressing in our education and skills, then we would all compete for ever lower wages. It\'s fair to say this is NOT happening. The United States is growing into a fuller service and knowledge economy, so the former scenario seems more reasonable. Undocumented laborers help (and will continue to help) our economy. Second, we examine the persistent notion that undocumented immigrants are a drain on the treasury. As with other critiques of immigration, this one also runs afoul of empirics. When the evidence is reviewed, it turns out that undocumented immigrants are not a drain. In fact, they are an added benefit to the treasury. Simply consider that, >"Stephen Goss, chief actuary for the Social Security Administration, [reports] that undocumented workers contribute about $15 billion a year to Social Security through payroll taxes. [Yet, they] only take out $1 billion (very few undocumented workers are eligible to receive benefits). Over the years, undocumented workers have contributed up to $300 billion, or nearly 10 percent, of the $2.7 trillion Social Security Trust Fund... [That said, t]he problem...is that undocumented workers are not evenly distributed. In areas like southern Texas and Arizona and even parts of Brooklyn, undocumented immigrants impose a substantial net cost to local and state governments..." http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/17/magazine/do-illegal-immigrants-actually-hurt-the-us-economy.html So again the problem becomes one of nuance: the gross effect is positive, but there are exceptions. However, when this is the case, the sensible solution is not to consider removing the source of the net benefit (undocumented immigration) in favor of the exceptions. That is like abandoning your house because the windows leak water. (Better to fix them and try to save the house.) This leads us to a debate about sensible immigration reform, which has been the bone of contention until 2016 came along. Note: an anti-immigrant group, the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), had published research showing that undocumented immigration is a net drainage on public benefits. This research was shown to be flawed by the right-leaning Cato Institute - among other things, the CIS did not control for household size and other factors. Cato also informed CIS repeatedly of their methodological flaws, yet they persisted. See the Cato critique here: https://www.cato.org/blog/center-immigration-studies-exaggerates-immigrant-welfare-use (We are almost there. Let\'s turn to the one area that is left in the anti-immigrant\'s rhetorical arsenal.)   c. Culture: This is an area that is rarely expressed by anti-immigrants, and is very telling: why ignore the cultural effects of immigration? It seems so obvious to tackle - and it is here that we may get to the kernel of the issue. First, I offer the obvious pro-immigrant take on culture. Then I turn to its opposition. As a whole, immigration enriches the nation by diversifying its culture. In particular, US culture has done great wonders with the constant influx of diverse immigrants. Most, if not all, of the greatest cultural centers in our nation are places where cultures mix: the Northeast, the West Coast, and South Florida suggest themselves. They are not cesspools of depravity, but cultural cauldrons where artists and scientists alike mix – and where a great social discourse peppers life with myriad contributions. To negate this is to ignore the cultural history of this country. (I leave these claims for others to elaborate.) On the other hand, what are the cultural arguments AGAINST immigration - undocumented and otherwise? One possibility is that immigrants will not integrate. But, large and by, this is proven false. In fact, a 2015 study by the National Academy of Science found that, >"[o]verall...current immigrants and their descendants are integrating into U.S. society...Across all measurable outcomes, integration increases over time, with immigrants becoming more like the native-born with more time in the country, and with the second and third generations becoming more like other native-born Americans than their parents were." http://www.nap.edu/catalog/21746/the-integration-of-immigrants-into-american-society http://books.google.com/books/about/The_Integration_of_Immigrants_Into_Ameri.html?id=LZTRCwAAQBAJ Another study is the Indicators of Immigrant Integration, which compares integration across EU and OECD countries. It also generally rates the US in a positive light with respect to immigrant integration: http://www.oecd.org/migration/indicators-of-immigrant-integration-2015-settling-in-9789264234024-en.htm The above studies, as well as a third one, are also discussed here: http://www.cato.org/blog/great-assimilation-scare In short, there are reputable studies showing that immigrants DO integrate into society. But with the intellectual walls closing in, the stalwart anti-immigrant will still denounce that "American society" is corrupted by new immigrants. No matter the arguments. No matter the evidence. It is at this point that we grant him one small but significant concession: Yes, American society will not remain the same with more immigration. It will invariably change – and that is kind of the whole point. When we allow immigrants, we don\'t only help foster their dreams of America. We help ours as well. High-immigrant cities tend to be hubs of innovation, commerce, and culture. To the degree that we see a better future in those activities, then immigration justifies itself. But if we sacrifice those goals in favor of some fossilized image of America, then the walls are already erected. We do have a choice, and it is powerful. I don\'t hope to change many stubborn minds with this, but I do want to give pro-immigrants the tools to defend their viewpoints. The world is on our side – so is history and the evidence. Let\'s press on.', ">>{Buttocks} : No I'm not. These kids just have bad parents.", '>>{Izor28} : Well im a legal citizen and your taxes are supposed to go to that. These are illegals who have no rights to our money.', ">>{woolcommerce} : > No I'm not. May your children one day grow up to marry good brown children, be safe and sound, and may your descendants never think about your hate.", ">>{ophelia_jones} : If you think that they have no rights to our money, then I encourage you to point your anger at American businesses who exploit their cheap labor for shitty jobs that Americans won't take pennies for instead of children who are learning how to read.", '>>{Buttocks} : >May your children one day grow up to marry good brown children, and may your descendants never think about your hate. As if all illegal immigrants are brown people. Your racism is showing! Also, how is it hateful to want people to immigrate legally?', ">>{TrumpSuxRussianDick} : Fuck that, America is for *all people.* Being born here doesn't make you special. I guarantee you those students are far more American than you'll ever be.", ">>{TrumpSuxRussianDick} : Agreed. Mexico is a shit hole, and fixing it and turning it into a prosperous country would take a lot of time and effort. It'd far easier to just come to America. Besides, Americans never had to do that, by the time they arrived here the Native Americans had already built a progressive, prosperous nation. Americans have never had to truly work for anything or create a society. We shouldn't expect the citizens of other nations to do so either.", ">>{TrumpSuxRussianDick} : You seem to think it isn't our duty as humans and Americans to take care of the rest of the world.", ">>{jaysrapsleafs} : all these trump supporters think immigrating to the US is as easy as rolling out of bed. Wht they don't realize it's basically impossible for the average mexican to immigrate to the US unless they're married to an american.", ">>{TrumpSuxRussianDick} : Finally, some common sense. My daughter was hungry two nights ago, and I had spent all of her food money on gambling. So I went out and beat the shit out of some old lady and stole her purse. She had a few hundred bucks in it, and I was able to buy my daughter a chicken sandwich from Carl's Jr. as well as have some cash left over for the casino. Do I want to live like this? Fuck no, but I have to keep my daughter safe.", '>>{TrumpSuxRussianDick} : First they came for the Hispanics.. and I did not speak out because I was not Hispanic.. Then they came for the women.. and I did not speak out because I was not a woman.. Then they came for the African Americans.. and I did not speak out because I was not an African American.. Then they came for the jihadists.. and I did not speak out because I was not a jihadist.. Then they came for me.. and there was no one left to speak for me..', ">>{Swimwithamermaid} : Cartels don't only terrorize certain cities in Mexico. Not only that but Mexico is not like America where we can pick up and leave and for sure find work somewhere else. People there have limited education and limited work opportunities. Most are farmers and cattle ranchers, pretty hard to just pick that up and move somewhere else. Also remember cartels like to threaten people, wouldn't put it past them to force a family to stay in their home/town so they can use them.", '>>{Izor28} : Not really. They should be punished as well but first we need to get the illegals out and secure the border.', ">>{churm91} : Yeah it's almost like there's a REASON it's that way. Hmmmm", ">>{jaysrapsleafs} : not really, cuz there's plenty of jobs for them we know Americans won't do. give em a legal pathway and stop whining.", '>>{woolcommerce} : Ok, Adolph. Plausible deniability much? And enjoy the last days of your traitor president.', ">>{Buttocks} : >Being born here doesn't make you special. Being born here makes you an American citizen... >I guarantee you those students are far more American than you'll ever be. That's literally impossible.", '>>{epchipko} : This really seems to be the Trump strategy. Keep the fear and uncertainty level dialed up enough to satisfy the base supporters of this and avoid the expenses of actually doing something effective while hoping these people self-deport. I doubt it will be particularly effective unless the only goal is cruelty.'], ['>>{conanthecnidarian} : Donald Trump was pretty much the last one to the table calling the GOP out on their plan. But of course he gets all the credit for saying what thousands of people had already said. Do we get 4 years of this propaganda?', '>>{joepo32} : Leave it to Fox to try to give all of the credit to a Republican. Even though most credit should go to the media who blew it up and made it too big of an issue for the GOP to keep it hidden.', '>>{Masstch} : Apparently, surprises may become common in our new world. I thought 2016 had used them all up!', ">>{easye2889} : I think there is a lot of misinformation around this. Hoping this can shed some light. - The reason they are trying to pass this is because the committee apparently is notorious for making accusations without any actual due process. Since there was no real process House members would have no real way to defend themselves until the damage to their reputation is already done resulting in an expensive PR campaign. The committee could also take anonymous tips and leak the information - some suspect these anonymous tips could come from politically motivated sources (aka a republican trying to run and wants to damage their opponents image). In 2006 this was deemed as a necessary evil. - I think it's great that Trump criticized the move - however - he has no real power over House rules and has no way to influence the decision - separation of powers is great that way (or bad depending how you look at it idk?) - This isn't about the ethics committee - this is about the Office of Congressional Ethics which historically has been used to smear democrats - so retooling this committee will actually help democrats since their will be tighter processes and house members can't just use it to air grievances. - Finally - (shameless plug on how terrible the media is) once again we see a media frenzy over a story that has not fully developed and is spun into oblivion misleading many American citizens. When will we be able to once again trust our media to deliver the news and not tell us what we are supposed to think?", ">>{IslamicShibe} : The whole thing is a clusterfuck where apparently the GOP planned this late last night. Good on Trump I suppose, I think this was just testing the waters to see what they can get away with, try to see if Trump was okay with abandoning draining the swamp. Looks like he's passed the test. Most interesting takeaway from the story is how irrelevant the Democrats are now, they have no power, Trump is gonna be fighting the GOP more than the Democrats. And I suspect some blue dog Democrats will side with him more often than some of the crony neocons", '>>{UnHappy_Farmer} : What an obvious fucking set up. They are turning the Federal Government into Reality TV.', ">>{JustGotOffOfTheTrain} : Yeah, I'm sure it's Trump who made the GOP change course. Not the media coverage or the outrage of voters.", '>>{Masstch} : On your last point: I hope that we never ever again become complacent to the point that we believe just whatever the media delivers. Thanks mostly to the advent of the internet, we no longer have to \'just believe\' what three old white guys say. I hope we never go back to those "good ol\' days" of Walter telling us "and that\'s the way it is" and us having no other source to back him up.', '>>{IslamicShibe} : There was not enough time for the media or outrage to do anything, this happened late last night, only this morning people were learning about it and by 11am Trump had tweeted his disapproval. Had Trump waited a few days this would have definitely caused some massive outrage but he saw it and killed it on sight. Dislike a lot about Trump but credit where credit is due. If you bend your views to side with the bad guy because you oppose the good guy in the situation you will end up being the bad guy.', '>>{JustGotOffOfTheTrain} : This move was in the news last night. I found out about it because Elizabeth Warren talked about it on her Facebook at around 9PM. It was a top story on Reddit within hours.', ">>{IslamicShibe} : Yeah well Reddit is not at all representative of voters or else we would have had president Paul then President Sanders (or Clinton). I watch the news all the time, I didn't see it until this morning when Conway was defending it like most Americans. Looks like Trump went against all his advisors on this one which was good", '>>{JustGotOffOfTheTrain} : Reddit is just a reflection of the fact that the news was out there and being spread. The fact is, this dirty trick by the Republicans was being widely reported and widely criticized. Trump saw the way the wind was blowing and Fox is unfairly giving him credit where no credit is due.', ">>{reptile7383} : The last person should get all the credit, right? Maybe if dems were smarter they'd keep quite and be the last person to speak. /s", ">>{IslamicShibe} : The fire was just starting when Trump stomped it out. I don't think it was a dirty trick, I think it was clearly bait to try to see how ethical Trump is and to counter his 'drain the swamp' method. He passed this test, his own party and people in his own administration like Conway pushed him towards the fire and he stepped out of the way. Not only fox is giving him credit BTW, I've seen the same thing posted by AP, NBC"], ['>>{zlackins} : Trump now too toxic for Paul Ryan, Hill GOP', '>>{growyurown} : If this guy is too toxic, where does the tea party fall in the spectrum?', '>>{Realizad} : If he appears to be undermining Trump, it would cause a backlash from his party and could hurt his own House candidates who need Trump supporters to come out in November. >Now, party officials tell CNN say they will monitor how bad the fallout will be for Trump - and how he performs at the next two debates - before abandoning him completely.', '>>{SpookyKid94} : Doubt it. Dump Trump, spend all the money they would have spent on his ads on ones for congress. Not like core Trump supporters are numerous enough to impact the general anyway.', '>>{fairbackpacker} : How can people take the Republican shit show seriously anymore? The literal Republican Leader of the House tries as much as he can to never ever mention the Republican candidate in all his media/ social media activities. It is absolutely unprecedented.', ">>{Forestman88} : The damning thing is that Trump wasn't too toxic months ago.", ">>{row_guy} : It's sad that this is what it took. Open racism and sexsim were fine until this.", '>>{007meow} : Why did it take five hours? A competently run campaign would have had it out there immediately. I would venture a guess that he himself was resisting and had to be convinced to say something.', ">>{BedWedOrBehead} : Maybe this will blow over by dinner. We'll wait and see.", '>>{BedWedOrBehead} : > it would cause a backlash from his party and could hurt his own House candidates who need Trump supporters to come out in November. By keeping him they face an even worse time because all indications are that Clinton is going to have a lot more voters showing up.', ">>{BedWedOrBehead} : Doesn't matter where they fall, they all have LifeAlert necklaces. They can just push the little button.", ">>{3_Limes} : I'm calling BS on this. By the time Tuesday rolls around they'll still be 'supporting the nominee', as will 99% of the GOP and 99% of Trump's base. They'll find some course of thinking that justifies continued support. And if that doesn't work they'll just go with denial.", '>>{Gargatua13013} : > They\'ll find some course of thinking that justifies continued support. "*A force d\'avaler quelques couleuvres, on finit par les avaler toutes*" Tr: "*You start by swallowing a few snakes, eventually you end up swallowing them all*" ... Antigone, Jean Anouilh', '>>{Gargatua13013} : Heh! Now *there\'s* an objective measure of the moral flexibility of the Republican party: "*Now, party officials tell CNN say they will monitor how bad the fallout will be for Trump -- and how he performs at the next two debates -- before abandoning him completely.*" They\'ll support him to the bitter end, unless he cannot garner electoral support and "the fallout is too bad". So much for the party of family values...', '>>{sprcow} : If I were involved in the Trump campaign, I think I would make him produce apology videos on a variety of topics in advance, just to reduce the turnaround time here.']]

classify and reply

[">>{Lessthanzerofucks} : It's frustrating that there are a few cool ones but they all look terrible at a decent size. Edit: it's probably just the ones I like, nbd. Ain't mad at OP.", ">>{kjellpu} : Will Donald Trump's old rival Elizabeth Warren run against him for president in 2020?", '>>{kekus_vult} : Pocahontas is no rival of him she just ranted against Trump without any effect.', ">>{maimoolee} : any day. hope it will make everyone's Monday a little better", '>>{smashthattrash1} : Jesus Christ, can we stop talking about 2020 and start talking about 2018? How the fuck are we going to get some congressional seats back? And can we have *any* democrats in the news that are 60 or younger?', ">>{StatuSChecKa} : EDIT: Here is a ZIP link: http://imgur.com/a/W0rkQ/zip . It will take a while since IMGUR has to compile the ZIP then the download will start. I'm downloading these so I can put them in the Google Drive and use them on my devices. I am using the **/zip** url keyword to download them all at once. I don't want to post the ZIP link out of respect to OP unless he says it's okay.", ">>{Akeb} : She's sending smoke signals. Gosh I'd love to hear her shriek her way to failure in 2020", ">>{maimoolee} : Please do. I'll get over it, I promise. :)", ">>{Ketchupkitty} : Going to be tough for her, she's largely been disowned by her core voter group. She can probably rebound by then but its likely we see another Establishment pick no one cares about.", ">>{__Noodles} : I upvoted you for the visibility... because I want such a silly comment to be seen for its misunderstanding of reality. Have you looked to see what seats are up in 2018? It'll be a fucking miracle if Dems don't lose most of the seats that are up. You can want things to be one way, but that doesn't actually make it happen.", ">>{__Noodles} : Didn't she just get one electoral vote this election? Spotted eagle right?", '>>{camplightsatnight} : thanks! If you want to view these as a grid: [http://imgur.com/a/W0rkQ?grid](http://imgur.com/a/W0rkQ?grid)', ">>{dragontology} : No no no, not Google Drive, Google Photos. Specifically the shared album Reddit Wallpaper Exchange. That way 1 it doesn't count against your quota and 2 we can all access it. Just nothing pornographic or low quality (less than 6/6s resolution). Link: https://goo.gl/photos/bBXfkCs2ye7zpVQKA", ">>{dalovindj} : Shouldn't have bent the knee. She should have run in the first place. Barring that, she should have stood up and done the right thing by endorsing Bernie in the primaries. Going into 2016 I wanted her to be President. Now, I would never vote for her. When it mattered, she did not have the courage of her convictions. She was like a spineless deer in the headlights until after the primaries when she got turned into a Trump attack dog on Twitter. A function that I feel should have been beneath her (and that she wasn't particularly good at).", ">>{jwarnyc} : I don't get it there's no young energized liberal that can be also a good sales person? Why everyone is so old and outdated?", '>>{TheHayisinTheBarn} : I can see it now ... ***Twitter Wars!***', '>>{lolrightythen} : Your argument would be better by providing substance to back your claim instead of attacking the previous commenter.', ">>{ibumpbeats} : That's what she said Edit: great album thanks for sharing", ">>{pgabrielfreak} : It's coming up because GOP is pushing the idea of TRump running in 2020. Because that pushes the idea that their guy did such a great job that OF COURSE HE'LL RUN AGAIN. I have seen 2020 mentioned many times by GOP lately. Dont fall for it just b.s. tactics. But clever as shit I'll admit. They're sneaky fuckers.", ">>{KoreTen} : ?? Most of them look good on my Galaxy S7 Edge, which is a higher resolution than the iPhone 7. I can't see how they'd look bad on the much smaller iPhone SE screen.", ">>{__Noodles} : So you also haven't looked to see which seats are up in 2018 then...", ">>{druuconian} : Warren would be a *disaster.* Take most of Hillary's liabilities (allergic to the press, comes off as aloof, drives white working class dudes nuts), and then add the explosive issue of affirmative action (which, right or wrong, they will throw at her over her claims of Native American ancestry). If we are dumb enough to nominate her we deserve to be in the minority for the next 8 years. She's like a less appealing Ted Kennedy.", ">>{lolrightythen} : I don't need to look it up, I know what is happening. I also believe smashthattrash is right in what he said and you are being fatalistic. If dems continue to try once every four years, they may as well give up altogether right now. But your smugness is really what piqued my interest... Must be a hit at parties.", '>>{NinjaEarl} : Can someone tell me is the bottom one is any good?', ">>{TrippleTonyHawk} : I was very disappointed with her during the primaries, and I must say that it's very frustrating that she has never leveled with her supporters that had first wanted her to run for president but then switched to Bernie as to why she proceeded the way she did. I think she's overdue for that. If she continues to fight for the things that I thought made her a viable presidential candidate for 2016 and responds reasonably to that question, I'd be happy to give her a shot in 2020. I'd love to see Bernie on the ballot again, but idk, that age attack seems to work well against him for whatever reason... I mean I don't personally get it, I feel like if he had a good VP then who cares... but still.", ">>{aamirislam} : Maybe she should've ran this time, I guarantee you Bernie only ran because she was too scared of Clinton to do so. She could've won the primaries too, she could've had the enthusiasm Bernie generated and Clinton couldn't attack her as being sexist or standing in the way of the first woman president. Honestly after this cycle I just see her as a normal opportunist, didn't support Bernie even though their policies are very similar so she could have the chance at becoming VP. She could've been president, but I guess that's none of my business", ">>{StatuSChecKa} : All I did was 'hack' the IMGUR URL. So desktop users can download a zip. I'm not using google drive to share, only for my personal collection. If someone wants to upload these to a community album, that's fine too.", '>>{elislider} : fun fact, [this image](http://i.imgur.com/W6gT4An.png) was commissioned by Microsoft as one of the engravings you could get on a Zune. [I have a few](http://imgur.com/lTCNKam) more: http://wallpapersafari.com/zune-zodiac-wallpaper/', ">>{disaccharides} : I'm on a 7+, resolution is absolutely fine no dodgy upscaling", '>>{elislider} : Oddly I tried doing this just from the browser and it would never generate a ZIP, but if I had the link and tried a Save As, it still thinks for a while then tries to save an HTML, but it looks like it is actually downloading a ~300mb zip', '>>{HistoryBuff92} : Shhhhh! You might actually make Democrats aware of midterm elections win that kind of talk!', ">>{MadHatter514} : Warren's policies were closer to Clinton than Sanders. People on here project onto her because they never actually bothered to look up her actual positions.", '>>{StatuSChecKa} : Ah sorry man. I think IMG has been slowly killing off features from back before they became a social media platform. It is a 300MB file though.', '>>{BasketOfDeplorable} : Hopefully not. Pocahontas will get LANDSLID if she runs. Bring back Bernie!!!!!!..', '>>{TheCocksmith} : NO!!! Do not download these pictures to an android phone. They are incompatible, and will delete the system32 file from your hard drive, and you will only be able to call Canadian phone numbers.', ">>{VampireInitiative} : Pocahontas? Not a chance. She can't be taken seriously any more. Trump would destroy her.", '>>{VampireInitiative} : > smoke signals I see what you did there.', ">>{speeduponthedamnramp} : Loved all of these. Until I scrolled to one picture that I'm pretty sure made some of my PTSD flare up. Whyyyyyyy", '>>{elislider} : it did actually download, i just had to rename the HTML to .zip and it was all there. i think it was just the size of the album that was causing the site to act weird. i tried it on some other smaller albums and it worked fine', '>>{strawburry} : Just changed my wallpaper for the first time in like 3 years. Pretty big day!', '>>{heaintheavy} : They are like 8-Track tapes. You can find them at Goodwill.', '>>{jman077} : This is actually the size I expected it to be.', '>>{elislider} : I was in the original Zune Ambassador program, and just started collecting them. I love finding interesting ones with engravings, prints, special editions, etc', ">>{achensherd} : Hmm... pretty nice, pretty nice. I wonder how many more there ar-- oh. Yeah... I'm going to have to save this post for later.", ">>{maimoolee} : Didn't expect such a positive reaction. Thank you guys.", '>>{ben5292001} : I did it, guys. I got all the way to the bottom on mobile without swiping to the next Imgur post.', '>>{jlee98} : I change my wallpaper about 4 or 5 times a day haha, but this is definitely good to add to my stache', '>>{jlee98} : Is there any way to cycle wallpapers on an iPhone? I saved about 100 of these and would love to use them all', ">>{GVLaker09} : Wasn't going to open the album, but now...", '>>{catkinson19} : Was looking for a new background when I stumbled on your thread.', '>>{CHRGuitar} : Jesus. This post after scrolling through nine hundred and fucking thirty four images.', '>>{CubeCraft751} : It can’t be that bi- >Load 934 remaining images? Well. I have a few hours to spare', '>>{petrochief} : Is there a way to set wallpapers to a slideshow? Is that something that would have to be done through jail breaking?', '>>{elislider} : My white Ambassador Zune and the brown one I later found on eBay. There\'s less than 100 of each color made in that edition. Also the 3 "launch day" ones which are super rare. Orange, bright pink, and blue/grey', '>>{USChills} : Scroll scroll scroll... load remaining 934 images... Up vote for later but will forget.', '>>{MrDyl4n} : did you ever play the picnic tower defense game on the zune? that was the shit', ">>{HerpDerpMcGurk} : Man I miss my zune. I still have it, but t doesn't charge anymore ='[", '>>{thedrunkdingo} : One day...one day I will be like you...', '>>{thedrunkdingo} : It depends which one(s) take your fancy', '>>{thedrunkdingo} : Some of them absolutely refused to load but the rest were lovely. Thanks :)', ">>{jlee98} : I definitely was but it is at least once a day, I don't know why I just like something different at the time and I'll slap it on and when I find something cooler I'll change it", ">>{nekholm} : AlienBlue crashed, Safari crashed.. Guess I'll have to view them on a computer.", '>>{bostonfaninPA} : [found it for you.](http://i.imgur.com/2bquWPy.jpg)', ">>{dranobob} : Oops. I should have worded that better. I'm curious if anyone has a link like this one to a great stock pile of iPad wallpapers.", '>>{_Coffeebot} : Hijacking this, if you want to download them all http://imgur.com/a/W0rkQ/zip', '>>{yeahbuddy} : Downloading all via LTE. Living in the unlimited world is great. Thanks Legere!', ">>{shanthology} : All dem duplicates. There's like maybe 700 in there once you remove the duplicates and ones that aren't even phone size.", '>>{kingp1ng} : Question for OP: Are all these wallpapers the same resolution for the iPhone 6/6s/7 retina display? 900+ wallpapers is a lot to go through.', '>>{maimoolee} : most of them are. I would say 80% will look good on 6s', ">>{dariushro} : The zip link doesn't seem to be working for me :( Edit: Tried with firefox and it worked.", '>>{jdguy17} : Totally commenting on this just so that I can find it again in the future', '>>{dizzie131} : Was so cool to see my hometown /r/Adelaide in the collection! http://i.imgur.com/GE470vw.png', ">>{musiczlife} : Can I get a simple link to download them all? Imgur zip conversion isn't working for me.", ">>{weirdtothebone} : Very pleased with the big variety of wallpapers :). Haven't seen all of them but at first they seem pretty fine :)."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{Lessthanzerofucks} : It's frustrating that there are a few cool ones but they all look terrible at a decent size. Edit: it's probably just the ones I like, nbd. Ain't mad at OP.", ">>{maimoolee} : any day. hope it will make everyone's Monday a little better", ">>{StatuSChecKa} : EDIT: Here is a ZIP link: http://imgur.com/a/W0rkQ/zip . It will take a while since IMGUR has to compile the ZIP then the download will start. I'm downloading these so I can put them in the Google Drive and use them on my devices. I am using the **/zip** url keyword to download them all at once. I don't want to post the ZIP link out of respect to OP unless he says it's okay.", ">>{maimoolee} : Please do. I'll get over it, I promise. :)", '>>{camplightsatnight} : thanks! If you want to view these as a grid: [http://imgur.com/a/W0rkQ?grid](http://imgur.com/a/W0rkQ?grid)', ">>{dragontology} : No no no, not Google Drive, Google Photos. Specifically the shared album Reddit Wallpaper Exchange. That way 1 it doesn't count against your quota and 2 we can all access it. Just nothing pornographic or low quality (less than 6/6s resolution). Link: https://goo.gl/photos/bBXfkCs2ye7zpVQKA", ">>{ibumpbeats} : That's what she said Edit: great album thanks for sharing", ">>{KoreTen} : ?? Most of them look good on my Galaxy S7 Edge, which is a higher resolution than the iPhone 7. I can't see how they'd look bad on the much smaller iPhone SE screen.", '>>{NinjaEarl} : Can someone tell me is the bottom one is any good?', ">>{StatuSChecKa} : All I did was 'hack' the IMGUR URL. So desktop users can download a zip. I'm not using google drive to share, only for my personal collection. If someone wants to upload these to a community album, that's fine too.", '>>{elislider} : fun fact, [this image](http://i.imgur.com/W6gT4An.png) was commissioned by Microsoft as one of the engravings you could get on a Zune. [I have a few](http://imgur.com/lTCNKam) more: http://wallpapersafari.com/zune-zodiac-wallpaper/', ">>{disaccharides} : I'm on a 7+, resolution is absolutely fine no dodgy upscaling", '>>{elislider} : Oddly I tried doing this just from the browser and it would never generate a ZIP, but if I had the link and tried a Save As, it still thinks for a while then tries to save an HTML, but it looks like it is actually downloading a ~300mb zip', '>>{StatuSChecKa} : Ah sorry man. I think IMG has been slowly killing off features from back before they became a social media platform. It is a 300MB file though.', '>>{TheCocksmith} : NO!!! Do not download these pictures to an android phone. They are incompatible, and will delete the system32 file from your hard drive, and you will only be able to call Canadian phone numbers.', ">>{speeduponthedamnramp} : Loved all of these. Until I scrolled to one picture that I'm pretty sure made some of my PTSD flare up. Whyyyyyyy", '>>{elislider} : it did actually download, i just had to rename the HTML to .zip and it was all there. i think it was just the size of the album that was causing the site to act weird. i tried it on some other smaller albums and it worked fine', '>>{strawburry} : Just changed my wallpaper for the first time in like 3 years. Pretty big day!', '>>{heaintheavy} : They are like 8-Track tapes. You can find them at Goodwill.', '>>{jman077} : This is actually the size I expected it to be.', '>>{elislider} : I was in the original Zune Ambassador program, and just started collecting them. I love finding interesting ones with engravings, prints, special editions, etc', ">>{achensherd} : Hmm... pretty nice, pretty nice. I wonder how many more there ar-- oh. Yeah... I'm going to have to save this post for later.", ">>{maimoolee} : Didn't expect such a positive reaction. Thank you guys.", '>>{ben5292001} : I did it, guys. I got all the way to the bottom on mobile without swiping to the next Imgur post.', '>>{jlee98} : I change my wallpaper about 4 or 5 times a day haha, but this is definitely good to add to my stache', '>>{jlee98} : Is there any way to cycle wallpapers on an iPhone? I saved about 100 of these and would love to use them all', ">>{GVLaker09} : Wasn't going to open the album, but now...", '>>{catkinson19} : Was looking for a new background when I stumbled on your thread.', '>>{CHRGuitar} : Jesus. This post after scrolling through nine hundred and fucking thirty four images.', '>>{CubeCraft751} : It can’t be that bi- >Load 934 remaining images? Well. I have a few hours to spare', '>>{petrochief} : Is there a way to set wallpapers to a slideshow? Is that something that would have to be done through jail breaking?', '>>{elislider} : My white Ambassador Zune and the brown one I later found on eBay. There\'s less than 100 of each color made in that edition. Also the 3 "launch day" ones which are super rare. Orange, bright pink, and blue/grey', '>>{USChills} : Scroll scroll scroll... load remaining 934 images... Up vote for later but will forget.', '>>{MrDyl4n} : did you ever play the picnic tower defense game on the zune? that was the shit', ">>{HerpDerpMcGurk} : Man I miss my zune. I still have it, but t doesn't charge anymore ='[", '>>{thedrunkdingo} : One day...one day I will be like you...', '>>{thedrunkdingo} : It depends which one(s) take your fancy', '>>{thedrunkdingo} : Some of them absolutely refused to load but the rest were lovely. Thanks :)', ">>{jlee98} : I definitely was but it is at least once a day, I don't know why I just like something different at the time and I'll slap it on and when I find something cooler I'll change it", ">>{nekholm} : AlienBlue crashed, Safari crashed.. Guess I'll have to view them on a computer.", '>>{bostonfaninPA} : [found it for you.](http://i.imgur.com/2bquWPy.jpg)', ">>{dranobob} : Oops. I should have worded that better. I'm curious if anyone has a link like this one to a great stock pile of iPad wallpapers.", '>>{_Coffeebot} : Hijacking this, if you want to download them all http://imgur.com/a/W0rkQ/zip', '>>{yeahbuddy} : Downloading all via LTE. Living in the unlimited world is great. Thanks Legere!', ">>{shanthology} : All dem duplicates. There's like maybe 700 in there once you remove the duplicates and ones that aren't even phone size.", '>>{kingp1ng} : Question for OP: Are all these wallpapers the same resolution for the iPhone 6/6s/7 retina display? 900+ wallpapers is a lot to go through.', '>>{maimoolee} : most of them are. I would say 80% will look good on 6s', ">>{dariushro} : The zip link doesn't seem to be working for me :( Edit: Tried with firefox and it worked.", '>>{jdguy17} : Totally commenting on this just so that I can find it again in the future', '>>{dizzie131} : Was so cool to see my hometown /r/Adelaide in the collection! http://i.imgur.com/GE470vw.png', ">>{musiczlife} : Can I get a simple link to download them all? Imgur zip conversion isn't working for me.", ">>{weirdtothebone} : Very pleased with the big variety of wallpapers :). Haven't seen all of them but at first they seem pretty fine :)."], [">>{kjellpu} : Will Donald Trump's old rival Elizabeth Warren run against him for president in 2020?", '>>{kekus_vult} : Pocahontas is no rival of him she just ranted against Trump without any effect.', '>>{smashthattrash1} : Jesus Christ, can we stop talking about 2020 and start talking about 2018? How the fuck are we going to get some congressional seats back? And can we have *any* democrats in the news that are 60 or younger?', ">>{Akeb} : She's sending smoke signals. Gosh I'd love to hear her shriek her way to failure in 2020", ">>{Ketchupkitty} : Going to be tough for her, she's largely been disowned by her core voter group. She can probably rebound by then but its likely we see another Establishment pick no one cares about.", ">>{__Noodles} : I upvoted you for the visibility... because I want such a silly comment to be seen for its misunderstanding of reality. Have you looked to see what seats are up in 2018? It'll be a fucking miracle if Dems don't lose most of the seats that are up. You can want things to be one way, but that doesn't actually make it happen.", ">>{__Noodles} : Didn't she just get one electoral vote this election? Spotted eagle right?", ">>{dalovindj} : Shouldn't have bent the knee. She should have run in the first place. Barring that, she should have stood up and done the right thing by endorsing Bernie in the primaries. Going into 2016 I wanted her to be President. Now, I would never vote for her. When it mattered, she did not have the courage of her convictions. She was like a spineless deer in the headlights until after the primaries when she got turned into a Trump attack dog on Twitter. A function that I feel should have been beneath her (and that she wasn't particularly good at).", ">>{jwarnyc} : I don't get it there's no young energized liberal that can be also a good sales person? Why everyone is so old and outdated?", '>>{TheHayisinTheBarn} : I can see it now ... ***Twitter Wars!***', '>>{lolrightythen} : Your argument would be better by providing substance to back your claim instead of attacking the previous commenter.', ">>{pgabrielfreak} : It's coming up because GOP is pushing the idea of TRump running in 2020. Because that pushes the idea that their guy did such a great job that OF COURSE HE'LL RUN AGAIN. I have seen 2020 mentioned many times by GOP lately. Dont fall for it just b.s. tactics. But clever as shit I'll admit. They're sneaky fuckers.", ">>{__Noodles} : So you also haven't looked to see which seats are up in 2018 then...", ">>{druuconian} : Warren would be a *disaster.* Take most of Hillary's liabilities (allergic to the press, comes off as aloof, drives white working class dudes nuts), and then add the explosive issue of affirmative action (which, right or wrong, they will throw at her over her claims of Native American ancestry). If we are dumb enough to nominate her we deserve to be in the minority for the next 8 years. She's like a less appealing Ted Kennedy.", ">>{lolrightythen} : I don't need to look it up, I know what is happening. I also believe smashthattrash is right in what he said and you are being fatalistic. If dems continue to try once every four years, they may as well give up altogether right now. But your smugness is really what piqued my interest... Must be a hit at parties.", ">>{TrippleTonyHawk} : I was very disappointed with her during the primaries, and I must say that it's very frustrating that she has never leveled with her supporters that had first wanted her to run for president but then switched to Bernie as to why she proceeded the way she did. I think she's overdue for that. If she continues to fight for the things that I thought made her a viable presidential candidate for 2016 and responds reasonably to that question, I'd be happy to give her a shot in 2020. I'd love to see Bernie on the ballot again, but idk, that age attack seems to work well against him for whatever reason... I mean I don't personally get it, I feel like if he had a good VP then who cares... but still.", ">>{aamirislam} : Maybe she should've ran this time, I guarantee you Bernie only ran because she was too scared of Clinton to do so. She could've won the primaries too, she could've had the enthusiasm Bernie generated and Clinton couldn't attack her as being sexist or standing in the way of the first woman president. Honestly after this cycle I just see her as a normal opportunist, didn't support Bernie even though their policies are very similar so she could have the chance at becoming VP. She could've been president, but I guess that's none of my business", '>>{HistoryBuff92} : Shhhhh! You might actually make Democrats aware of midterm elections win that kind of talk!', ">>{MadHatter514} : Warren's policies were closer to Clinton than Sanders. People on here project onto her because they never actually bothered to look up her actual positions.", '>>{BasketOfDeplorable} : Hopefully not. Pocahontas will get LANDSLID if she runs. Bring back Bernie!!!!!!..', ">>{VampireInitiative} : Pocahontas? Not a chance. She can't be taken seriously any more. Trump would destroy her.", '>>{VampireInitiative} : > smoke signals I see what you did there.']]

classify and reply

['>>{DoggydogFA} : Help me please! When I listen to music in my headphones, the volume goes crazy RANDOMLY', ">>{Rocko9999} : If another pair of headphones don't cause this issue, it's the headphones. If they do, it's the phone.", '>>{WesternPhilosophy} : I hate to say it, but a president-elect Trump is going to skate by a lot of these accusations and charges.', '>>{CodenameVillain} : If the courts rule against him, how does that affect him taking office? Can someone ELI5?', ">>{d_c_d_} : How the fuck do you figure that one? He's leaving office with a higher approval rating than Reagan and his would be successor received 3 million more votes than her rival.", ">>{wolflink009} : I'd put far more of the blame on Hillary Clinton to be honest. If democrats ran nearly any other candidate the party would have at least won the presidency and be in much better shape overall. Also the DNC pushed for her extremely hard so they share blame as well.", '>>{12temp} : I can see trump supporters now: "Oh it wont hold up at least he didn\'t have an email scandal hurrrrrrr". If Hillary deserves to go to jail Trump better join her ass because hes fucked over millions of people over the years. Lock him up.', ">>{TumblinTonyT} : I don't think it was Obama personally so much as it was the corporatization and professionalization of the Democratic Party. That honestly has more to do with the legacy of the Clintons than it does with Obama. Granted, this is just me reading my own biases into the issue, but I suspect I'm not alone in feeling this way.", '>>{its-you-not-me} : These legal investigations by the FBI and NY AG are the best opportunities to neuter or destroy this guy, and need more attention.', '>>{DoggydogFA} : Right. As the post up there states: it is the phone. Maybe some setting regarding the "hands-free"? Maybe some setting regarding the motion on the phone? I did try other headphones and the problem seems to be semi-common: https://www.google.com.sv/search?q=iphone+volume+changes+by+itself&oq=iphone+volume+changes+by+itself&aqs=chrome.0.69i59.4489j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8', '>>{Iamien} : He pardons himself after pushing back the sentencing a few months.', ">>{throwawaywriterhack} : No they're not, but its not about reality but about defining, branding for lazy and gullible followers", ">>{Merc_Drew} : He can't go to jail while in office... Congress would have to impeach first then vote to remove from office... if he was removed, then he would be a private citizen again and could go to jail.", ">>{Merc_Drew} : Also I don't know if these cases are against him personally or if they are against his company", '>>{alleycatzzz} : No, but saying detaining American citizens based on race is getting close.', ">>{NotAnHiro} : I don't know. That means Pence takes over.", ">>{DoggydogFA} : I also suspect demonic possession. Or that the phone is now alive. I will name it skippy. Skippy the possessed phone. Sometimes works days in a row! sometimes it doesn't. It depends how close or far I am from god's light.", '>>{Rocko9999} : Restore as new. If it continues, get it fixed.', ">>{bitfriend} : It's a disaster in the metric that matters: raw votes. Democrats have not been locked out of the federal government in over a century. And the GOP can easily, *easily* legislate themselves into a nearly permanent position of power if they chose to do so.", '>>{jetfuelmeme} : Have you tested your headphones with another device to verify that they are indeed functioning correctly? Edit: duh, missed your line in the OP.', ">>{Sootraggins} : But he's hurt actual human beings. Voters only care about cute emails getting hurt.", ">>{OmegaFemale} : Trump has well documented ties to mafia going back decades. He's a criminal. Lock him up.", '>>{danth} : Yes, they are the ravings of a nazi. A nazi who said all Mexicans are rapists (except for "some of them"), a nazi who wants to register and round up every person of a particular religion, and a nazi who has expressed his desire to fuck his own daughter on multiple occasions. Any other questions? > *When Mexico sends its people*, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. **They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.** [Video link](http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/06/16/trump_mexico_not_sending_us_their_best_criminals_drug_dealers_and_rapists_are_crossing_border.html) > On ABC News’ This Week, host George Stephanopoulos asked Trump, "You did stir up a controversy with those comments over the database. Let\'s try to clear that up. Are you unequivocally now ruling out a **database on all Muslims**?" > "**No, not at all**," Trump responded. "I want a database for the refugees that -- if they come into the country. We have no idea who these people are." [Link](http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2015/nov/24/donald-trumps-comments-database-american-muslims/) > “Ivanka, what’s the favorite thing you have in common with your father,” Williams asks. “Either real estate, or golf,” Ivanka replies. > “Donald?” Williams prompts. > “Well, I was going to say sex, but..." [Video](http://gawker.com/does-donald-trump-want-to-have-sex-with-his-daughter-1756738294)', '>>{whollyfictional} : An interestingly written piece that does a good job of starting out with what seems like an evenhanded approach, and then just descends into ridiculousness.', ">>{xmagusx} : It's a civil suit. It doesn't affect his taking office in any way.", '>>{bitfriend} : Obama heavily campaigned for Hilary and tried to lend her his star power, even though he was pushing a bill (the TPP) she was supposedly against.', '>>{DoggydogFA} : Yes "I will fix my problem" ............. :\') Thank you for your help.', '>>{moonsprite} : Lazy? I remember a report saying Bernie/Hillary supporters are most unemployed voters, Trump supporters are the most employed. Just saying...', '>>{jetfuelmeme} : Have you tried a hard reset rather than a restart?', ">>{WL19} : > He's leaving office with a higher approval rating than Reagan Obama being popular doesn't mean that he helped the party's brand. If the party was as popular as they *should* have been with such a popular President, then Donald Trump wouldn't have gotten within 50 miles of the White House, and the Democrats wouldn't have suffered such drastic losses at every level of government throughout his 8 years as President. > and his would be successor received 3 million more votes than her rival. His successor lost the party three states that had been blue for nearly three decades; coincidentally, the three states that ultimately won it for Trump. Not only that, but the three million margin that Clinton won the popular vote with is down from the five million margin that Obama won with in 2012, and down from the ten million margin that Obama won with in 2008. You can certainly say that Obama is a swell guy, but it's hard to make the argument that the party isn't in pretty rough shape as he leaves office.", ">>{xmagusx} : It's a civil suit, not a criminal one.", ">>{DoggydogFA} : I've tried restoring it as new. I've updated the entire iOS, (it has failed in all of these accounts) .........and I have not tried a hard-reset. How is that done?", '>>{ramblemn} : /r/Politics is Hillary land. Anything pro trump is crapped on.', ">>{xmagusx} : It's a civil suit, not a criminal one.", ">>{danth} : Everything I've said is true and on video or audio recording. Sorry if your politics aren't reality based.", ">>{wolflink009} : Bernie would have won so easily. Hillary primary voters literally threw away a possible once in a lifetime opportunity. I think I'lll always be salty about that.", ">>{xmagusx} : Just so everyone knows -- this is a civil suit. They won't lock him up, though yes, that would indeed be hilarious.", '>>{BalanceCoil} : 84% of women crossing the border illegally are raped. So yes.', ">>{Loxodontist} : The only incalculable damage that's been inflicted on Democrats is the white backlash against a black president.", '>>{luismpinto} : Yes - but did that immunity start yesterday, or does it start on Jan 20th?', '>>{jetfuelmeme} : Hold power button and home button until the phone restarts.', '>>{DoggydogFA} : Thank you! I will try that when the problem happens next and I\'ll let you know if it made a difference. ....Right now it isn\'t doing it (again: random and no pattern) so I\'m not touching it, I need to finish the Ayreon "Human Equation" album. It\'s too good.', '>>{kiirakiiraa} : Yes, happy to see this perspective represented here. I\'m reading "Listen Liberal" by Thomas Frank which discusses this very thoroughly and would totally recommend to anyone interested in learning more.', ">>{mattchoo86} : I've had this happen to me a few times. Volume going crazy and what not. What solved it for me was taking compressed air, and blowing the port out. Canned air may do the job, but I really knocked everything loose when I used an air compressor at work. A whole bunch of crap fell out, lint, dust, etc, and haven't had any problems since.", ">>{Arb3395} : He may have hurt millions of people but he hasn't had anybody killed is the answer I keep getting with the slow thinkers", '>>{OutofajobinNovember} : This is correct. The record states that I, as a Clinton supporter, do not have any other questions since you so eloquently told the truth in your own way.', ">>{Notfuzz45} : Joke answer: Your phone is merely upgrading itself to remove its aux port functionally to be more like the latest iPhone Real answer: This is definitely not a software related issue, it is a hardware issue. Somewhere between you DAC and your headphone jack there is a loose connection and/or contamination. The only way to fix this would be to replace the hardware. Damage can often happen if your headphone cords get yanked on in a bad way. You might get lucky and have it only be dirt in the port that you could clean out, but if that doesn't work you are out of luck.", '>>{Diggey11} : I think the word "inflicted" puts too much fault on his shoulders and ignores what happened this election. As in it\'s Obamas fault that democrats lost so hugely. While he can be partially to blame for perhaps backing Clinton, he would have backed anyone if it meant that his ideals would live on instead of that of a moronic madman. People not being excited about Clinton can be attributed more as fault of the DNC, Obama tried his dampest to rally his voters and new voters behind Clinton.', ">>{luismpinto} : Because it's related to things that happened before, right? But as others said, it's just a civil case so nothing serious will come out of this...", '>>{Risley} : Not with how fickle the american public is right now. If the economy crashes, theyll get swept out again.', ">>{dinosaur_friend} : Do the headphones have a mic? Have you tried the headphones with other phones, and does the same issue occur? Have you tried other headphones with mics with your iPhone? If the issue is only with those headphones, and not with other types of headphones (with mics and without mics), then you know what's causing it. If the issue persists regardless of mic-less/mic headphones, clean out your iPhone's headphone port. If that doesn't work, then something happened to the contacts inside the port. Turn your phone off and maybe wrap a piece of tape (sticky side out) around an unbent paper clip and try to remove dust from the contacts that way. Or use a dry Q-tip and gently clean it out. I had a similar problem with my JLab earphones (with mic). The volume would change even when I slightly touched the jack, and Siri/Voice Control would constantly pop up. Tested it with an Android phone and the same thing happened. It was the earphones. The iPhone worked fine with the original Apple earpods and any headphones/earphones without mics.", ">>{d_c_d_} : Well, constantly retweeting racist shit isn't helping much. How many white supremacist is Trump following?", '>>{DoggydogFA} : Thank you for the hard attempt to help, it is very much appreciated. "Do the headphones have a mic?" A// Yes they do. "Have you tried the headphones with other phones and does the same issue occur?" A// Not with other phones no. But I have tried other headphones WITHOUT mics into the iPhone and it does the same. (Just plain headphones, no headset, no mic). The only way in which it doesn\'t happen is when I plug an aux cable, that goes into a tiny amplifier, that then goes into the headphones. It ends up looking like this: http://theroundingsound.com/wp-content-2112/uploads/2015/09/Poweradd-Best-portable-Headphone-Amp.jpg "Have you tried other headphones with mics with your iPhone?" A// Not really, no. "Clean out your iPhone\'s headphone port" I shall do that, I will buy compressed air and will do the q-tip method. WHY IT MAY NOT BE DUST: Today for example. The problem was happening. It went on for a good 10 to 15 minutes. ...but then... nothing. They worked fine. As if the iPhone was merely trolling me or alive with a mind of its own. I moved the jack, twisted it, turned it, moved the phone, shook it, put it on my pocket, outside, ...whatever I did, and the music was CONSTANT, was clear, was perfect. ...for HOURS. for like... 4 hours in a row. ... But I\'m sure that tomorrow it may happen again. Or maybe not. Or maybe 1 week from now. Or maybe 5 days in a row. Like I said: It has no pattern! It\'s the scary part. It behaves as if it is software in my opinion (but that\'s just my opinion based on what I percieve which I\'m sure isn\'t the full scope)', '>>{Risley} : Its not a possible once in a lifetime, it was exactly that. That was a guy who has the record for being progressive and standing up for whats right, and be against corporate money and the establishment. We lost a golden opportunity to turn this country around. We wont get that again for many decades.', ">>{12temp} : I'm sorry I didn't realize hillary was on trial for murder. They both deserve their day in court but neither will ever face real consequences for their actions.", ">>{Arb3395} : Apparently she hired a hitman or something a few years back. There isn't and real evidence besides one person's stories. But some people will believe anything", ">>{CoyoteeBongwater} : you're not taking into account the amount of medals that have been given out. Surely that counts for something good", ">>{moonsprite} : People who don't want to support a dishonest pro-war politican like Hillary are retarded? Yeah, no.", '>>{SlicedDicedBeef} : Rape Deniers: 9 Facts About Illegal Alien Crime The Media Covers Up http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/07/10/rape-deniers-9-facts-about-illegal-alien-crime-the-media-covers-up/', '>>{john_doe_jersey} : They tried that after 2002 and it backfired completely within 4 years.', ">>{Risley} : Had it not been for the NAFTA shit and the TPP, Hillary would have been able to sway the rust belt. But it was too much. They didnt trust her. I have relatives in Michigan that said if Bernie would have run, they would have voted for him, but instead went with Trump bc Hillary wasn't trustworthy to bring back jobs to that area.", ">>{bitfriend} : The economy has already crashed in most of the country. Detroit went bankrupt in 2013, the same year Michegan became a Right-To-Work state. Whatever happens in blue states is no matter, it's the swing vote which counts. And in the swing states, the economy is already in the dumpster due to neglect.", '>>{Yellowben} : Lock them both up. Everyone will be happy then', '>>{WafflesEXE} : Have you checked your volume buttons? They may be stuck and causing random volume changes. Another theory: maybe your case is misaligned with your volume buttons, it might be pressing them!', ">>{DoggydogFA} : As the OPost above states, the buttons seem perfectly fine and I've tried it without the case as well :( it isn't the buttons I'm 99.999% sure of that", ">>{xmagusx} : No problem. Everyone writing about this is trying to phrase it so that it sounds like a criminal matter, but that's just for clickbait purposes.", ">>{WafflesEXE} : I see! Sorry that didn't fix your problem. Maybe your headphone port connection is slightly corroded due to moisture over the years, resulting in a bad connection. Although I'm not entirely sure if yours is a case of a corroded port, but here's how to clean one: Switch your phone off first... 1) with a q-tip dip lightly in distilled white vinegar, then insert it into your headphone port and scrub the connections 2) then with another q-tip soak it in a little isopropyl alcohol and flush out the port Make sure your port is clean before you do this, so you won't jam any lint or dust deeper into the port. You may have to repeat the steps if it doesn't work for the first time. However if this method fails after 3 or more tries this is probably not the solution you need. Best of luck!", ">>{Merc_Drew} : I believe even as president he would have to pay civil suits if found against him... if it is his business I believe he has to divest himself from all of it before he takes office so it wouldn't affect him if purely against his business", '>>{bitfriend} : Only because Bush tried to make a "homeowner society", through government incentives to buy homes. The GOP wants to axe fannie, freddie and sallie entirely now.', ">>{DoggydogFA} : Thank you so much! Hmm.. do you think this should be done -after- compressed air? Maybe both things? what would work best? I'm just a bit scared of inserting a wet q-tip into a port even if it can be done safely, it is merely a dumb irrational concern of mine. I'll do it if I have to of course Again thank you so so much!", ">>{WafflesEXE} : I've never used compressed air before, so assuming it's used to blow out lint and dust from your port, use that before cleaning your port with vinegar. Just be sure your port is lint free. Inserting a wet q-tip into a port will be fine, if you let the moisture dry out afterwards. You are very welcome! Hope this works for you :-)", '>>{progressivemoron} : You must be joking. Do you have any idea how much political baggage Comrade Sanders carries around?', ">>{Butter_me_biscuits} : Don't forget insane levels of sexism misogyny and xenophobia.", ">>{xmagusx} : That depends. The President has immunity from civil actions as a result of his official duties. This is why Obama couldn't be sued for loss of income or whatever for passing Obamacare, but why Bill Clinton was able to be sued for sexual harassment. The matter involving Trump and Trump University long predates his being elected, so there should be no problem with the civil trial moving forward despite his being President.", ">>{dinosaur_friend} : I think what you need to do is get hold of another phone and test all of the headphones you used with your iPhone on the other phone. Because both of your headphones may not be functioning correctly. If you still have issues with the other phone, then you know for sure that it's the headphones. It very well could be a software/driver issue. I'm having an issue with iOS 10 right now which causes all sound to stop working on my phone if I plug my earphones in while my phone is connected to its charger. I'm 90% sure that this is an iOS 10 software-driver issue after reading a few Apple threads about it--iOS 10 gets confused and causes the sound drivers to malfunction when more than one port is plugged. Or it could be a hardware issue. But I never had the issue come up on iOS 9 or under. If you really do feel it's a hardware issue, back up your phone with iTunes and set it up as a new phone and use it for a couple of hours to a few days and see if the issue comes up. It's not an ideal solution, but it might solve the issue. At this point there are so many issues with iOS 10 that it's hard to differentiate hardware from software issues (see: constant battery problems affecting iPhone 6 series and up on iOS 10).", '>>{Zink0xide} : Fuck that. Trump is a buffoon. Pence is dangerous.', '>>{jeffwinger_esq} : Uh, the GOP controlled both houses and the White House from 2002-2006.', '>>{capncuster} : They impeached Clinton for lying about a blowjob. Will they impeach Trump for perjury in a fraud case?', ">>{capncuster} : He doesn't have immunity. Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case establishing that a sitting President of the United States has no immunity from civil law litigation against him or her, for acts done before taking office and unrelated to the office.", '>>{xmagusx} : Literally what I just said. >immunity from civil actions ***as a result of his official duties*** ... >but why Bill Clinton was able to be sued for sexual harassment.', '>>{Merc_Drew} : Thank you for that, definitely clarified my own knowledge on the matter :) I thought I was missing something', ">>{Merc_Drew} : If Trump committed perjury while in office yes... but precedence was set that perjury doesn't matter to a president", ">>{Risley} : Then 4 more years of nothing won't make them any more happy than they are right now.", '>>{ImSuperHighRightNow} : > attributed more as fault of the DNC And Russia apparently.', '>>{Merc_Drew} : A president can only pardon federal cases, not state', '>>{xmagusx} : Quite welcome, and yeah, there\'s just a lot of clickbait phrasing of the event. "Faces fraud court date" gets more traffic than, "is still being sued".', ">>{drdissonance} : She was eating babies a couple days before the election, the trolls will propagate any rumors about her no matter how outlandish. I seriously doubt trump is gonna want to prosecute her because the left will galvanize even more to investigate him, and I'm sure there's plenty still out there.", ">>{progressivemoron} : No, way more than Clinton. My guess is you don't know anything about Sanders, other than his false promise of giving you free stuff if you vote for him.", '>>{wolflink009} : I knew a crap ton about Sanders. Guy is almost scandal free apart from being called a commie lolz', '>>{bitfriend} : so you\'re changing the argument from "Trump will crash everything" to "Trump won\'t do anything"?', ">>{inb4ElonMusk} : I don't think people even understand what a civil suit is. No wonder this country is so fucked up.", '>>{TheLionFollowsMe} : The DNC has destroyed the brand by rigging the primary in favor of Clinton and throwing out millions of votes for Bernie. The party is called "the democratic party" for shits sake.', '>>{Raspberries-Are-Evil} : NY is perusing criminal fraud charges. It could be a criminal case as well.', '>>{inb4ElonMusk} : Only he could lose a large chunk of money. Which likely would be held up in appeals for longer than he could even be POTUS.', '>>{inb4ElonMusk} : Seriously. How do people not know this stuff already?', ">>{TumblinTonyT} : Considering that Trump was on the other side of the ticket and that Obama is relatively popular for an outgoing President, I really don't think this is terribly surprising. Obama certainly wanted Clinton to win, so once the field was clear he endorsed her and campaigned on her behalf.", ">>{inb4ElonMusk} : This is seriously basic stuff people don't seem to know.", ">>{xmagusx} : True. Could be, but as of yet isn't, and seems unlikely to become one before January 20th.", ">>{inb4ElonMusk} : Honestly if there's a single Trump supporter on the jury, you know this goes nowhere.", '>>{TumblinTonyT} : From what I\'ve heard, *Listen Liberal* is a pretty good read, and Frank is more sympathetic to the takeover of the Democratic Party than someone might suppose. He doesn\'t depict the gradual shift of the Democratic Party from a party defined by working class interests to the interests of the professional class as a shady cabal or conspiracy; instead, Frank depicts it as the result of cultural conservatism within the labor movement in the 1960s and 70s, especially regarding the Vietnam War and urban riots. This led to tension with the young Baby Boom generation, especially those attending college and University. These Boomers would go on to professional success in the workplace which often put their economic worldview at odds with the worldview of the working class, but they retained their culturally liberal attitudes for the most part. Clinton tried to forge a governing philosophy that would appeal to both sides and succeeded, but tried to shift the identity of the Democratic Party away from blue collar workers and more towards well-educated professionals, who are now known (derisively) as the "liberal elites."', ">>{kiirakiiraa} : Yep, there wasn't a shady corporate conspiracy to take over the Democratic Party -- the party's departure from working class interests was gradual and unintended (at first, before Clinton). Overall, I've found it a great read, and unlike a lot of recent books written about politics, it's still hugely relevant/valid after Trump's win.", ">>{txyesboy} : Free stuff Wanna know how to spot someone who doesn't know anything about Bernie Sanders? The quote above is all you need to know.", '>>{ManElegant} : 8 years of failures mentioned and yet not one of those failures mentioned in any detail whatsoever.', ">>{Risley} : What? No, you just said that the rust belt folks are living in an area that's already depressed. Since trump won't be doing anything for them, then they'll get 4 years of nothing. As for the rest of us living in an actual functioning economy, we will see the crash. And republicans won't be able to blame it on Obamacare considering he's giving the economy over while it's growing, not crashing. 75 Months Of Job Growth **Dem numbers don't lie**", '>>{mrburnhollywood} : Hillary and Slate already broke ground... Playing footsy with Saudi princes is nothing compared to accepting campaign "contributions" from Russia, a state with nuclear missiles pointed at us.', '>>{greenerdoc} : Even scarier than a Trump presidency is a Pence presidency', ">>{notmikeee} : He'll be in control anyway. Might as well have Trump face teh embarrassment of not lasting 4 years and then let the world see what a piece of shit Pence is.", ">>{its-you-not-me} : It wouldn't happen like that, I'd think. If we can wrap him up in scandals that eat up the first two years for example, we'd have the opportunity to keep him from accomplishing anything and a small chance at the senate in 2018 to make sure he's and/or pence are completely neutered. Delay, delay, delay until we get a chance to correct it.", ">>{jjmc123a} : [Can't pardon yourself for state crimes](http://lawnewz.com/opinion/if-hillary-is-indicted-president-clinton-could-pardon-herself-and-congress-might-be-helpless/) >Based on the language of Article II, Section 2, the only limits placed on the power are that pardons may only be issued for federal offenses (not civil or state crimes) If I understand correctly, if NY does persue a criminal fraud charge, can't pardon himself.", '>>{NotAnHiro} : He got Pence and is holding himself hostage. Fuck.', ">>{rovinja} : Didn't she drop the case bc of death threats?", '>>{lasertits69} : Talking about hurting people? Only one of the candidates has started ACTUAL WARS and been implicated in shady weapons deals. Gaddafi got anally raped with a bayonet because she wanted to play war.', ">>{andyb5} : You think Pence would be able to control the God Emperor? HAHA. Pence will do his job just fine but as you've seen from the second presidential debate, they don't agree on the some things. Pence is just his insurance policy to give the middle finger if he was removed or something happened.", ">>{Minimum_balance} : I didn't know that! Where can I read more about this?", ">>{lasertits69} : Talking about hurting actual people? Only one of the candidates has started ACTUAL WARS and been implicated in shady weapons deals. Gaddafi got anally raped with a bayonet because she wanted to play war. She laughed about that by the way. She's the only one who pulled a character assassination action on a twelve year old girl who had been raped into a coma in order to get her rapist set free! And she laughed about that too! She thought it was funny that a human being was raped with a fucking bayonet. She thought it was funny that a violent child rapist could beat a polygraph. EDIT: TOP KEK! getting downvoted for bringing up facts in response to oversimplified snark! If you think it was all about some emails simply being where they weren't supposed to be then you are the uninformed voter!", '>>{tacoextreme} : google "Trump Atlantic City Mafia" and pick your favorite source.', ">>{big_hey_22} : Judge Curiel will be kind to him, I'm sure.", '>>{AT-ST} : Sadly yes. We live in a world were a girl who was raped at 13 years old gets death threats when she speaks out about it.', '>>{Arb3395} : The American government in general loves to play war not just Hillary', '>>{QMS235} : But Hillary loves to be a part of it.', '>>{Raspberries-Are-Evil} : I highly doubt it will, but one can hope...', ">>{Pantomchap} : I thought she was anonymous? How can you receive death threats if you're anonymous?", '>>{hopefullysfw} : The worst parts of a Pence presidency are going to happen anyway. Might as well have someone with self-control and government experience as Commander in Chief.', ">>{LandMineHare} : I don't know why you were down voted. She also wanted a war with Russia.", ">>{diet_dr_kelp} : More like she realized she didn't have a leg to stand on.", ">>{AT-ST} : There are several reasons why. Her lawyer wasn't anonymous and death threats for her can be sent to the lawyer. It is also possible to figure out who she is.", '>>{the8thbit} : I was confused, because at first I thought you were talking about the Iraq and Libyan wars.', ">>{Cindernubblebutt} : Hey can we get some congressional investigations into this fraud stuff? I bet we need at least 8 of them to make sure we find everything out and follow up on every lead to see if there's anything else fishy going on with Trump?", '>>{lasertits69} : Thanks (wo)man. I\'m being downvoted because "if I can\'t see you then you aren\'t real!" If these MSM-informed voters would open their eyes they would be disgusted that we almost had corporate-bought, law breaking, war-hawk Hillary as president and her satanist pedophile campaign manager as chief of staff. Thanks for bringing me from -9 to -8 haha', '>>{aneeta96} : Is it possible to be impeached before you are sworn in?', ">>{gnomeimean} : It said Clinton's team refused similar contacts. This is a non story because they have some representatives who keep in contact with any running candidate, it was the same in 08.", ">>{Elec7ricmonk} : So I've read it's a class action. If he loses is he looking at fines or would he be guilty of committing fraud ie:high crimes and misdemeanors?", ">>{invertedwut} : With how often this kind of post is made here some might think that recognizing the difference between a civil case and a criminal case is some kind of rocket science, how else would so many people fail to grasp it? But no, it's not rocket science, you just don't care about the difference.", ">>{invertedwut} : >What’s more, the FBI has reportedly looked into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russian officials ...months ago. And found nothing. The FBI under the authority of a partisan democrat appointee didn't find enough to go after. Even the NYTimes made the clinton campaign out to be run by idiots by debunking the entire 'trump's running an email server communicating with the kremlin!' story.", '>>{tacotruckparade} : This case is going to be a circus. Looks like he has to testify at some point. Imagine the cameras, secret service, not to mention Trump himself.', '>>{tacotruckparade} : One day people will start chanting "lock him up".', '>>{mhb20002000} : Except for 2018 the Dems are defending more seats then Republicans. This was the better year for a shift.', ">>{justanotheridiot99} : Pence can't sign executive orders, as VP. He still needs Trump to rubber stamp his shit. And Trump gets really bitchy if he hasn't had enough ass kissing. My god, Trump is the reasonable one. What the hell?!", '>>{justanotheridiot99} : Republicans tried to impeach Clinton, and found he had gotten a blowjob. Republicans will impeach Trump for anything? Are you serious?', ">>{BlackHumor} : That's true, but midterms historically favor the opposition. Democrats won big in 2006. They lost in 2002 but only because it happened so soon after 9/11.", '>>{mangzane} : If the following question was asked: >What cases can a President pardon? > A) Federal >B) State >C) Both I\'m sure many, many people would be inclined to say "C". Rather than making some braggart comment, maybe provide sources and material to educate instead.', ">>{its-you-not-me} : Yeah, that's clear. It's going to be rough few years. But I think this has woken up a lot of people, and some of those people have power, and some of those people will use it. I can picture the movie Aaron Sorkin might make about trump in a few months : http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/aaron-sorkin-writes-letter-to-his-daughter-after-donald-trump-wins-w449739", ">>{notmikeee} : But Trump isn't some alpha red pill whatever that reddit seems to think he is. When faced with confrontation he backs down, and if someone pays him a complement he's the must gullible person in America (except for the 50 million people who voted for him). Pence could tell him he's looking strong today and an executive order would get signed by noon."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{throwawaywriterhack} : No they're not, but its not about reality but about defining, branding for lazy and gullible followers", '>>{alleycatzzz} : No, but saying detaining American citizens based on race is getting close.', '>>{danth} : Yes, they are the ravings of a nazi. A nazi who said all Mexicans are rapists (except for "some of them"), a nazi who wants to register and round up every person of a particular religion, and a nazi who has expressed his desire to fuck his own daughter on multiple occasions. Any other questions? > *When Mexico sends its people*, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. **They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.** [Video link](http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/06/16/trump_mexico_not_sending_us_their_best_criminals_drug_dealers_and_rapists_are_crossing_border.html) > On ABC News’ This Week, host George Stephanopoulos asked Trump, "You did stir up a controversy with those comments over the database. Let\'s try to clear that up. Are you unequivocally now ruling out a **database on all Muslims**?" > "**No, not at all**," Trump responded. "I want a database for the refugees that -- if they come into the country. We have no idea who these people are." [Link](http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2015/nov/24/donald-trumps-comments-database-american-muslims/) > “Ivanka, what’s the favorite thing you have in common with your father,” Williams asks. “Either real estate, or golf,” Ivanka replies. > “Donald?” Williams prompts. > “Well, I was going to say sex, but..." [Video](http://gawker.com/does-donald-trump-want-to-have-sex-with-his-daughter-1756738294)', '>>{moonsprite} : Lazy? I remember a report saying Bernie/Hillary supporters are most unemployed voters, Trump supporters are the most employed. Just saying...', '>>{ramblemn} : /r/Politics is Hillary land. Anything pro trump is crapped on.', ">>{danth} : Everything I've said is true and on video or audio recording. Sorry if your politics aren't reality based.", '>>{BalanceCoil} : 84% of women crossing the border illegally are raped. So yes.', '>>{OutofajobinNovember} : This is correct. The record states that I, as a Clinton supporter, do not have any other questions since you so eloquently told the truth in your own way.', ">>{d_c_d_} : Well, constantly retweeting racist shit isn't helping much. How many white supremacist is Trump following?", ">>{moonsprite} : People who don't want to support a dishonest pro-war politican like Hillary are retarded? Yeah, no.", '>>{SlicedDicedBeef} : Rape Deniers: 9 Facts About Illegal Alien Crime The Media Covers Up http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/07/10/rape-deniers-9-facts-about-illegal-alien-crime-the-media-covers-up/'], [">>{d_c_d_} : How the fuck do you figure that one? He's leaving office with a higher approval rating than Reagan and his would be successor received 3 million more votes than her rival.", ">>{wolflink009} : I'd put far more of the blame on Hillary Clinton to be honest. If democrats ran nearly any other candidate the party would have at least won the presidency and be in much better shape overall. Also the DNC pushed for her extremely hard so they share blame as well.", ">>{TumblinTonyT} : I don't think it was Obama personally so much as it was the corporatization and professionalization of the Democratic Party. That honestly has more to do with the legacy of the Clintons than it does with Obama. Granted, this is just me reading my own biases into the issue, but I suspect I'm not alone in feeling this way.", ">>{bitfriend} : It's a disaster in the metric that matters: raw votes. Democrats have not been locked out of the federal government in over a century. And the GOP can easily, *easily* legislate themselves into a nearly permanent position of power if they chose to do so.", '>>{whollyfictional} : An interestingly written piece that does a good job of starting out with what seems like an evenhanded approach, and then just descends into ridiculousness.', '>>{bitfriend} : Obama heavily campaigned for Hilary and tried to lend her his star power, even though he was pushing a bill (the TPP) she was supposedly against.', ">>{WL19} : > He's leaving office with a higher approval rating than Reagan Obama being popular doesn't mean that he helped the party's brand. If the party was as popular as they *should* have been with such a popular President, then Donald Trump wouldn't have gotten within 50 miles of the White House, and the Democrats wouldn't have suffered such drastic losses at every level of government throughout his 8 years as President. > and his would be successor received 3 million more votes than her rival. His successor lost the party three states that had been blue for nearly three decades; coincidentally, the three states that ultimately won it for Trump. Not only that, but the three million margin that Clinton won the popular vote with is down from the five million margin that Obama won with in 2012, and down from the ten million margin that Obama won with in 2008. You can certainly say that Obama is a swell guy, but it's hard to make the argument that the party isn't in pretty rough shape as he leaves office.", ">>{wolflink009} : Bernie would have won so easily. Hillary primary voters literally threw away a possible once in a lifetime opportunity. I think I'lll always be salty about that.", ">>{Loxodontist} : The only incalculable damage that's been inflicted on Democrats is the white backlash against a black president.", '>>{kiirakiiraa} : Yes, happy to see this perspective represented here. I\'m reading "Listen Liberal" by Thomas Frank which discusses this very thoroughly and would totally recommend to anyone interested in learning more.', '>>{Diggey11} : I think the word "inflicted" puts too much fault on his shoulders and ignores what happened this election. As in it\'s Obamas fault that democrats lost so hugely. While he can be partially to blame for perhaps backing Clinton, he would have backed anyone if it meant that his ideals would live on instead of that of a moronic madman. People not being excited about Clinton can be attributed more as fault of the DNC, Obama tried his dampest to rally his voters and new voters behind Clinton.', '>>{Risley} : Not with how fickle the american public is right now. If the economy crashes, theyll get swept out again.', '>>{Risley} : Its not a possible once in a lifetime, it was exactly that. That was a guy who has the record for being progressive and standing up for whats right, and be against corporate money and the establishment. We lost a golden opportunity to turn this country around. We wont get that again for many decades.', ">>{CoyoteeBongwater} : you're not taking into account the amount of medals that have been given out. Surely that counts for something good", '>>{john_doe_jersey} : They tried that after 2002 and it backfired completely within 4 years.', ">>{Risley} : Had it not been for the NAFTA shit and the TPP, Hillary would have been able to sway the rust belt. But it was too much. They didnt trust her. I have relatives in Michigan that said if Bernie would have run, they would have voted for him, but instead went with Trump bc Hillary wasn't trustworthy to bring back jobs to that area.", ">>{bitfriend} : The economy has already crashed in most of the country. Detroit went bankrupt in 2013, the same year Michegan became a Right-To-Work state. Whatever happens in blue states is no matter, it's the swing vote which counts. And in the swing states, the economy is already in the dumpster due to neglect.", '>>{bitfriend} : Only because Bush tried to make a "homeowner society", through government incentives to buy homes. The GOP wants to axe fannie, freddie and sallie entirely now.', '>>{progressivemoron} : You must be joking. Do you have any idea how much political baggage Comrade Sanders carries around?', ">>{Butter_me_biscuits} : Don't forget insane levels of sexism misogyny and xenophobia.", '>>{jeffwinger_esq} : Uh, the GOP controlled both houses and the White House from 2002-2006.', ">>{Risley} : Then 4 more years of nothing won't make them any more happy than they are right now.", '>>{ImSuperHighRightNow} : > attributed more as fault of the DNC And Russia apparently.', ">>{progressivemoron} : No, way more than Clinton. My guess is you don't know anything about Sanders, other than his false promise of giving you free stuff if you vote for him.", '>>{wolflink009} : I knew a crap ton about Sanders. Guy is almost scandal free apart from being called a commie lolz', '>>{bitfriend} : so you\'re changing the argument from "Trump will crash everything" to "Trump won\'t do anything"?', '>>{TheLionFollowsMe} : The DNC has destroyed the brand by rigging the primary in favor of Clinton and throwing out millions of votes for Bernie. The party is called "the democratic party" for shits sake.', ">>{TumblinTonyT} : Considering that Trump was on the other side of the ticket and that Obama is relatively popular for an outgoing President, I really don't think this is terribly surprising. Obama certainly wanted Clinton to win, so once the field was clear he endorsed her and campaigned on her behalf.", '>>{TumblinTonyT} : From what I\'ve heard, *Listen Liberal* is a pretty good read, and Frank is more sympathetic to the takeover of the Democratic Party than someone might suppose. He doesn\'t depict the gradual shift of the Democratic Party from a party defined by working class interests to the interests of the professional class as a shady cabal or conspiracy; instead, Frank depicts it as the result of cultural conservatism within the labor movement in the 1960s and 70s, especially regarding the Vietnam War and urban riots. This led to tension with the young Baby Boom generation, especially those attending college and University. These Boomers would go on to professional success in the workplace which often put their economic worldview at odds with the worldview of the working class, but they retained their culturally liberal attitudes for the most part. Clinton tried to forge a governing philosophy that would appeal to both sides and succeeded, but tried to shift the identity of the Democratic Party away from blue collar workers and more towards well-educated professionals, who are now known (derisively) as the "liberal elites."', ">>{kiirakiiraa} : Yep, there wasn't a shady corporate conspiracy to take over the Democratic Party -- the party's departure from working class interests was gradual and unintended (at first, before Clinton). Overall, I've found it a great read, and unlike a lot of recent books written about politics, it's still hugely relevant/valid after Trump's win.", ">>{txyesboy} : Free stuff Wanna know how to spot someone who doesn't know anything about Bernie Sanders? The quote above is all you need to know.", '>>{ManElegant} : 8 years of failures mentioned and yet not one of those failures mentioned in any detail whatsoever.', ">>{Risley} : What? No, you just said that the rust belt folks are living in an area that's already depressed. Since trump won't be doing anything for them, then they'll get 4 years of nothing. As for the rest of us living in an actual functioning economy, we will see the crash. And republicans won't be able to blame it on Obamacare considering he's giving the economy over while it's growing, not crashing. 75 Months Of Job Growth **Dem numbers don't lie**"], ['>>{WesternPhilosophy} : I hate to say it, but a president-elect Trump is going to skate by a lot of these accusations and charges.', '>>{CodenameVillain} : If the courts rule against him, how does that affect him taking office? Can someone ELI5?', '>>{12temp} : I can see trump supporters now: "Oh it wont hold up at least he didn\'t have an email scandal hurrrrrrr". If Hillary deserves to go to jail Trump better join her ass because hes fucked over millions of people over the years. Lock him up.', '>>{its-you-not-me} : These legal investigations by the FBI and NY AG are the best opportunities to neuter or destroy this guy, and need more attention.', '>>{Iamien} : He pardons himself after pushing back the sentencing a few months.', ">>{Merc_Drew} : He can't go to jail while in office... Congress would have to impeach first then vote to remove from office... if he was removed, then he would be a private citizen again and could go to jail.", ">>{Merc_Drew} : Also I don't know if these cases are against him personally or if they are against his company", ">>{NotAnHiro} : I don't know. That means Pence takes over.", ">>{Sootraggins} : But he's hurt actual human beings. Voters only care about cute emails getting hurt.", ">>{OmegaFemale} : Trump has well documented ties to mafia going back decades. He's a criminal. Lock him up.", ">>{xmagusx} : It's a civil suit. It doesn't affect his taking office in any way.", ">>{xmagusx} : It's a civil suit, not a criminal one.", ">>{xmagusx} : It's a civil suit, not a criminal one.", ">>{xmagusx} : Just so everyone knows -- this is a civil suit. They won't lock him up, though yes, that would indeed be hilarious.", '>>{luismpinto} : Yes - but did that immunity start yesterday, or does it start on Jan 20th?', ">>{Arb3395} : He may have hurt millions of people but he hasn't had anybody killed is the answer I keep getting with the slow thinkers", ">>{luismpinto} : Because it's related to things that happened before, right? But as others said, it's just a civil case so nothing serious will come out of this...", ">>{12temp} : I'm sorry I didn't realize hillary was on trial for murder. They both deserve their day in court but neither will ever face real consequences for their actions.", ">>{Arb3395} : Apparently she hired a hitman or something a few years back. There isn't and real evidence besides one person's stories. But some people will believe anything", '>>{Yellowben} : Lock them both up. Everyone will be happy then', ">>{xmagusx} : No problem. Everyone writing about this is trying to phrase it so that it sounds like a criminal matter, but that's just for clickbait purposes.", ">>{Merc_Drew} : I believe even as president he would have to pay civil suits if found against him... if it is his business I believe he has to divest himself from all of it before he takes office so it wouldn't affect him if purely against his business", ">>{xmagusx} : That depends. The President has immunity from civil actions as a result of his official duties. This is why Obama couldn't be sued for loss of income or whatever for passing Obamacare, but why Bill Clinton was able to be sued for sexual harassment. The matter involving Trump and Trump University long predates his being elected, so there should be no problem with the civil trial moving forward despite his being President.", '>>{Zink0xide} : Fuck that. Trump is a buffoon. Pence is dangerous.', '>>{capncuster} : They impeached Clinton for lying about a blowjob. Will they impeach Trump for perjury in a fraud case?', ">>{capncuster} : He doesn't have immunity. Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case establishing that a sitting President of the United States has no immunity from civil law litigation against him or her, for acts done before taking office and unrelated to the office.", '>>{xmagusx} : Literally what I just said. >immunity from civil actions ***as a result of his official duties*** ... >but why Bill Clinton was able to be sued for sexual harassment.', '>>{Merc_Drew} : Thank you for that, definitely clarified my own knowledge on the matter :) I thought I was missing something', ">>{Merc_Drew} : If Trump committed perjury while in office yes... but precedence was set that perjury doesn't matter to a president", '>>{Merc_Drew} : A president can only pardon federal cases, not state', '>>{xmagusx} : Quite welcome, and yeah, there\'s just a lot of clickbait phrasing of the event. "Faces fraud court date" gets more traffic than, "is still being sued".', ">>{drdissonance} : She was eating babies a couple days before the election, the trolls will propagate any rumors about her no matter how outlandish. I seriously doubt trump is gonna want to prosecute her because the left will galvanize even more to investigate him, and I'm sure there's plenty still out there.", ">>{inb4ElonMusk} : I don't think people even understand what a civil suit is. No wonder this country is so fucked up.", '>>{Raspberries-Are-Evil} : NY is perusing criminal fraud charges. It could be a criminal case as well.', '>>{inb4ElonMusk} : Only he could lose a large chunk of money. Which likely would be held up in appeals for longer than he could even be POTUS.', '>>{inb4ElonMusk} : Seriously. How do people not know this stuff already?', ">>{inb4ElonMusk} : This is seriously basic stuff people don't seem to know.", ">>{xmagusx} : True. Could be, but as of yet isn't, and seems unlikely to become one before January 20th.", ">>{inb4ElonMusk} : Honestly if there's a single Trump supporter on the jury, you know this goes nowhere.", '>>{mrburnhollywood} : Hillary and Slate already broke ground... Playing footsy with Saudi princes is nothing compared to accepting campaign "contributions" from Russia, a state with nuclear missiles pointed at us.', '>>{greenerdoc} : Even scarier than a Trump presidency is a Pence presidency', ">>{notmikeee} : He'll be in control anyway. Might as well have Trump face teh embarrassment of not lasting 4 years and then let the world see what a piece of shit Pence is.", ">>{its-you-not-me} : It wouldn't happen like that, I'd think. If we can wrap him up in scandals that eat up the first two years for example, we'd have the opportunity to keep him from accomplishing anything and a small chance at the senate in 2018 to make sure he's and/or pence are completely neutered. Delay, delay, delay until we get a chance to correct it.", ">>{jjmc123a} : [Can't pardon yourself for state crimes](http://lawnewz.com/opinion/if-hillary-is-indicted-president-clinton-could-pardon-herself-and-congress-might-be-helpless/) >Based on the language of Article II, Section 2, the only limits placed on the power are that pardons may only be issued for federal offenses (not civil or state crimes) If I understand correctly, if NY does persue a criminal fraud charge, can't pardon himself.", '>>{NotAnHiro} : He got Pence and is holding himself hostage. Fuck.', ">>{rovinja} : Didn't she drop the case bc of death threats?", '>>{lasertits69} : Talking about hurting people? Only one of the candidates has started ACTUAL WARS and been implicated in shady weapons deals. Gaddafi got anally raped with a bayonet because she wanted to play war.', ">>{andyb5} : You think Pence would be able to control the God Emperor? HAHA. Pence will do his job just fine but as you've seen from the second presidential debate, they don't agree on the some things. Pence is just his insurance policy to give the middle finger if he was removed or something happened.", ">>{Minimum_balance} : I didn't know that! Where can I read more about this?", ">>{lasertits69} : Talking about hurting actual people? Only one of the candidates has started ACTUAL WARS and been implicated in shady weapons deals. Gaddafi got anally raped with a bayonet because she wanted to play war. She laughed about that by the way. She's the only one who pulled a character assassination action on a twelve year old girl who had been raped into a coma in order to get her rapist set free! And she laughed about that too! She thought it was funny that a human being was raped with a fucking bayonet. She thought it was funny that a violent child rapist could beat a polygraph. EDIT: TOP KEK! getting downvoted for bringing up facts in response to oversimplified snark! If you think it was all about some emails simply being where they weren't supposed to be then you are the uninformed voter!", '>>{tacoextreme} : google "Trump Atlantic City Mafia" and pick your favorite source.', ">>{big_hey_22} : Judge Curiel will be kind to him, I'm sure.", '>>{AT-ST} : Sadly yes. We live in a world were a girl who was raped at 13 years old gets death threats when she speaks out about it.', '>>{Arb3395} : The American government in general loves to play war not just Hillary', '>>{QMS235} : But Hillary loves to be a part of it.', '>>{Raspberries-Are-Evil} : I highly doubt it will, but one can hope...', ">>{Pantomchap} : I thought she was anonymous? How can you receive death threats if you're anonymous?", '>>{hopefullysfw} : The worst parts of a Pence presidency are going to happen anyway. Might as well have someone with self-control and government experience as Commander in Chief.', ">>{LandMineHare} : I don't know why you were down voted. She also wanted a war with Russia.", ">>{diet_dr_kelp} : More like she realized she didn't have a leg to stand on.", ">>{AT-ST} : There are several reasons why. Her lawyer wasn't anonymous and death threats for her can be sent to the lawyer. It is also possible to figure out who she is.", '>>{the8thbit} : I was confused, because at first I thought you were talking about the Iraq and Libyan wars.', ">>{Cindernubblebutt} : Hey can we get some congressional investigations into this fraud stuff? I bet we need at least 8 of them to make sure we find everything out and follow up on every lead to see if there's anything else fishy going on with Trump?", '>>{lasertits69} : Thanks (wo)man. I\'m being downvoted because "if I can\'t see you then you aren\'t real!" If these MSM-informed voters would open their eyes they would be disgusted that we almost had corporate-bought, law breaking, war-hawk Hillary as president and her satanist pedophile campaign manager as chief of staff. Thanks for bringing me from -9 to -8 haha', '>>{aneeta96} : Is it possible to be impeached before you are sworn in?', ">>{gnomeimean} : It said Clinton's team refused similar contacts. This is a non story because they have some representatives who keep in contact with any running candidate, it was the same in 08.", ">>{Elec7ricmonk} : So I've read it's a class action. If he loses is he looking at fines or would he be guilty of committing fraud ie:high crimes and misdemeanors?", ">>{invertedwut} : With how often this kind of post is made here some might think that recognizing the difference between a civil case and a criminal case is some kind of rocket science, how else would so many people fail to grasp it? But no, it's not rocket science, you just don't care about the difference.", ">>{invertedwut} : >What’s more, the FBI has reportedly looked into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russian officials ...months ago. And found nothing. The FBI under the authority of a partisan democrat appointee didn't find enough to go after. Even the NYTimes made the clinton campaign out to be run by idiots by debunking the entire 'trump's running an email server communicating with the kremlin!' story.", '>>{tacotruckparade} : This case is going to be a circus. Looks like he has to testify at some point. Imagine the cameras, secret service, not to mention Trump himself.', '>>{tacotruckparade} : One day people will start chanting "lock him up".', '>>{mhb20002000} : Except for 2018 the Dems are defending more seats then Republicans. This was the better year for a shift.', ">>{justanotheridiot99} : Pence can't sign executive orders, as VP. He still needs Trump to rubber stamp his shit. And Trump gets really bitchy if he hasn't had enough ass kissing. My god, Trump is the reasonable one. What the hell?!", '>>{justanotheridiot99} : Republicans tried to impeach Clinton, and found he had gotten a blowjob. Republicans will impeach Trump for anything? Are you serious?', ">>{BlackHumor} : That's true, but midterms historically favor the opposition. Democrats won big in 2006. They lost in 2002 but only because it happened so soon after 9/11.", '>>{mangzane} : If the following question was asked: >What cases can a President pardon? > A) Federal >B) State >C) Both I\'m sure many, many people would be inclined to say "C". Rather than making some braggart comment, maybe provide sources and material to educate instead.', ">>{its-you-not-me} : Yeah, that's clear. It's going to be rough few years. But I think this has woken up a lot of people, and some of those people have power, and some of those people will use it. I can picture the movie Aaron Sorkin might make about trump in a few months : http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/aaron-sorkin-writes-letter-to-his-daughter-after-donald-trump-wins-w449739", ">>{notmikeee} : But Trump isn't some alpha red pill whatever that reddit seems to think he is. When faced with confrontation he backs down, and if someone pays him a complement he's the must gullible person in America (except for the 50 million people who voted for him). Pence could tell him he's looking strong today and an executive order would get signed by noon."], ['>>{DoggydogFA} : Help me please! When I listen to music in my headphones, the volume goes crazy RANDOMLY', ">>{Rocko9999} : If another pair of headphones don't cause this issue, it's the headphones. If they do, it's the phone.", '>>{DoggydogFA} : Right. As the post up there states: it is the phone. Maybe some setting regarding the "hands-free"? Maybe some setting regarding the motion on the phone? I did try other headphones and the problem seems to be semi-common: https://www.google.com.sv/search?q=iphone+volume+changes+by+itself&oq=iphone+volume+changes+by+itself&aqs=chrome.0.69i59.4489j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8', ">>{DoggydogFA} : I also suspect demonic possession. Or that the phone is now alive. I will name it skippy. Skippy the possessed phone. Sometimes works days in a row! sometimes it doesn't. It depends how close or far I am from god's light.", '>>{Rocko9999} : Restore as new. If it continues, get it fixed.', '>>{jetfuelmeme} : Have you tested your headphones with another device to verify that they are indeed functioning correctly? Edit: duh, missed your line in the OP.', '>>{DoggydogFA} : Yes "I will fix my problem" ............. :\') Thank you for your help.', '>>{jetfuelmeme} : Have you tried a hard reset rather than a restart?', ">>{DoggydogFA} : I've tried restoring it as new. I've updated the entire iOS, (it has failed in all of these accounts) .........and I have not tried a hard-reset. How is that done?", '>>{jetfuelmeme} : Hold power button and home button until the phone restarts.', '>>{DoggydogFA} : Thank you! I will try that when the problem happens next and I\'ll let you know if it made a difference. ....Right now it isn\'t doing it (again: random and no pattern) so I\'m not touching it, I need to finish the Ayreon "Human Equation" album. It\'s too good.', ">>{mattchoo86} : I've had this happen to me a few times. Volume going crazy and what not. What solved it for me was taking compressed air, and blowing the port out. Canned air may do the job, but I really knocked everything loose when I used an air compressor at work. A whole bunch of crap fell out, lint, dust, etc, and haven't had any problems since.", ">>{Notfuzz45} : Joke answer: Your phone is merely upgrading itself to remove its aux port functionally to be more like the latest iPhone Real answer: This is definitely not a software related issue, it is a hardware issue. Somewhere between you DAC and your headphone jack there is a loose connection and/or contamination. The only way to fix this would be to replace the hardware. Damage can often happen if your headphone cords get yanked on in a bad way. You might get lucky and have it only be dirt in the port that you could clean out, but if that doesn't work you are out of luck.", ">>{dinosaur_friend} : Do the headphones have a mic? Have you tried the headphones with other phones, and does the same issue occur? Have you tried other headphones with mics with your iPhone? If the issue is only with those headphones, and not with other types of headphones (with mics and without mics), then you know what's causing it. If the issue persists regardless of mic-less/mic headphones, clean out your iPhone's headphone port. If that doesn't work, then something happened to the contacts inside the port. Turn your phone off and maybe wrap a piece of tape (sticky side out) around an unbent paper clip and try to remove dust from the contacts that way. Or use a dry Q-tip and gently clean it out. I had a similar problem with my JLab earphones (with mic). The volume would change even when I slightly touched the jack, and Siri/Voice Control would constantly pop up. Tested it with an Android phone and the same thing happened. It was the earphones. The iPhone worked fine with the original Apple earpods and any headphones/earphones without mics.", '>>{DoggydogFA} : Thank you for the hard attempt to help, it is very much appreciated. "Do the headphones have a mic?" A// Yes they do. "Have you tried the headphones with other phones and does the same issue occur?" A// Not with other phones no. But I have tried other headphones WITHOUT mics into the iPhone and it does the same. (Just plain headphones, no headset, no mic). The only way in which it doesn\'t happen is when I plug an aux cable, that goes into a tiny amplifier, that then goes into the headphones. It ends up looking like this: http://theroundingsound.com/wp-content-2112/uploads/2015/09/Poweradd-Best-portable-Headphone-Amp.jpg "Have you tried other headphones with mics with your iPhone?" A// Not really, no. "Clean out your iPhone\'s headphone port" I shall do that, I will buy compressed air and will do the q-tip method. WHY IT MAY NOT BE DUST: Today for example. The problem was happening. It went on for a good 10 to 15 minutes. ...but then... nothing. They worked fine. As if the iPhone was merely trolling me or alive with a mind of its own. I moved the jack, twisted it, turned it, moved the phone, shook it, put it on my pocket, outside, ...whatever I did, and the music was CONSTANT, was clear, was perfect. ...for HOURS. for like... 4 hours in a row. ... But I\'m sure that tomorrow it may happen again. Or maybe not. Or maybe 1 week from now. Or maybe 5 days in a row. Like I said: It has no pattern! It\'s the scary part. It behaves as if it is software in my opinion (but that\'s just my opinion based on what I percieve which I\'m sure isn\'t the full scope)', '>>{WafflesEXE} : Have you checked your volume buttons? They may be stuck and causing random volume changes. Another theory: maybe your case is misaligned with your volume buttons, it might be pressing them!', ">>{DoggydogFA} : As the OPost above states, the buttons seem perfectly fine and I've tried it without the case as well :( it isn't the buttons I'm 99.999% sure of that", ">>{WafflesEXE} : I see! Sorry that didn't fix your problem. Maybe your headphone port connection is slightly corroded due to moisture over the years, resulting in a bad connection. Although I'm not entirely sure if yours is a case of a corroded port, but here's how to clean one: Switch your phone off first... 1) with a q-tip dip lightly in distilled white vinegar, then insert it into your headphone port and scrub the connections 2) then with another q-tip soak it in a little isopropyl alcohol and flush out the port Make sure your port is clean before you do this, so you won't jam any lint or dust deeper into the port. You may have to repeat the steps if it doesn't work for the first time. However if this method fails after 3 or more tries this is probably not the solution you need. Best of luck!", ">>{DoggydogFA} : Thank you so much! Hmm.. do you think this should be done -after- compressed air? Maybe both things? what would work best? I'm just a bit scared of inserting a wet q-tip into a port even if it can be done safely, it is merely a dumb irrational concern of mine. I'll do it if I have to of course Again thank you so so much!", ">>{WafflesEXE} : I've never used compressed air before, so assuming it's used to blow out lint and dust from your port, use that before cleaning your port with vinegar. Just be sure your port is lint free. Inserting a wet q-tip into a port will be fine, if you let the moisture dry out afterwards. You are very welcome! Hope this works for you :-)", ">>{dinosaur_friend} : I think what you need to do is get hold of another phone and test all of the headphones you used with your iPhone on the other phone. Because both of your headphones may not be functioning correctly. If you still have issues with the other phone, then you know for sure that it's the headphones. It very well could be a software/driver issue. I'm having an issue with iOS 10 right now which causes all sound to stop working on my phone if I plug my earphones in while my phone is connected to its charger. I'm 90% sure that this is an iOS 10 software-driver issue after reading a few Apple threads about it--iOS 10 gets confused and causes the sound drivers to malfunction when more than one port is plugged. Or it could be a hardware issue. But I never had the issue come up on iOS 9 or under. If you really do feel it's a hardware issue, back up your phone with iTunes and set it up as a new phone and use it for a couple of hours to a few days and see if the issue comes up. It's not an ideal solution, but it might solve the issue. At this point there are so many issues with iOS 10 that it's hard to differentiate hardware from software issues (see: constant battery problems affecting iPhone 6 series and up on iOS 10)."]]

classify and reply

['>>{winstonjpenobscot} : He would have been road kill like all the other Republican nomination candidates. The party base is now anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim, anti-science and *definitely* anti-moderate.', '>>{drakeb55} : Tina Fey tells college-educated white women who voted for Trump: ‘You can’t look away’', ">>{typical_trump_voter} : lol and everyone thought this ticket couldn't get any shittier.", '>>{kekus_vult} : It proved you cant look away and ignore the suffering of the midwest or the demagogues will take the country away.', ">>{MortWellian} : After reading this, I'm wondering how much Cambridge Analytica and others narrowcasting on FB had an effect.", ">>{SaltHash} : The GOP's red meat base would have drooled as they watched Trump call Romney names like weak and loser. He should be glad that he stayed out of that crazy clown car.", '>>{IDFSHILL} : What\'s funny is Trump used to call Romney weak and claim he "choked but now Trump is losing to a weaker candidate than Obama was by a larger margin.', '>>{kekus_vult} : That attitude is why Tina Fey lost with her candidate she like you looked away.', ">>{FunfortheLadies} : You've got your head pretty far up your ass.", ">>{FishyFred} : > Trump isn't less of an establishment bitch than hillary Give me a fucking break.", ">>{irwincur} : I'm a lib, I give a shit about what some paid actor has to say... Why the hell do you hold these people with such high regard? It is just odd that the left seems so enamored with fame and not reality.", '>>{deezmutts} : Somebody get Donald on the phone. Why, Trump? I mean, just when your poll numbers are equalizing to the HRC you go and do this. Are there really that many GOP votes to gain out there?', ">>{AgentOfSPYRAL} : I think more people can name her because she's laughably incompetent, but I dont get the idea that Trump is better for those who are anti establishment.", ">>{zherok} : That's literally who Trump has in office. His secretary of education is a major Republican donor with zero experience in teaching and a massive profit and religiously motivated career in charter schools. This notion of draining the swamp by putting the millionaire and billionaire types who previously bankrolled politicians is crazy. You're just saving them money.", '>>{Vesstair} : Nah. Trump just would have used "obamneycare" to its full effect.', '>>{BenAfleckIsAnOkActor} : Hes in the wwe hall of fame bruh have some respect', '>>{ImSuperHighRightNow} : Remember when the GOP lost in 2012 and the party produced that* report that said the GOP would continue to lose national elections unless they appealed to more minorities? I honestly think this is why Trump won the primary, all the other candidates were at least *trying* to expand their appeal to minorities, Trump ignored the report and did the complete opposite. I think Romey would have fallen into the same trap and lost to Trump too.', '>>{santac311} : There is an opportunity for a great SNL sketch here. Bring back Jason Sudekis and make this happen. Kinda like Deep Thoughts with Jack Handey combined with Rob Schneider\'s Copier guy sketch. "Aye! Mitt. Dog on the roof.. Mitt.:: gotta take a...Mitt.. oh, yeah. Mitt..."', ">>{Xanthanum87} : So the article blames women for sexism. That's a first for me.", '>>{stevebeyten} : Lol this is the stupidest trope in politics. Everyone bashes libs for worshipping celebrities but why is it that the minute any celeb comes out as pro right wing, FOX news literally hires them as paid contributors? (See: Stacy dash, Scott baio, Ted nugent) and holds then out as actual authority figures on politics.', ">>{AgentOfSPYRAL} : Well I think incompetence always helps awareness, not sure how much of that is anti establishment or just anti incompetence, although I'm sure there's overlap. Do you have some sources on Booker being groomed? I feel like it's too early for the Ds to really know who they're going with.", '>>{Knightmare4469} : The right literally elected a TV reality show as president, but yea, the liberals are the one who are enamored with fame. 👌 Edited because I misunderstood your post at first.', ">>{LordOverThis} : God I never thought I'd see the day where I'd miss having faces like Romney or McCain as the Republican nominees. Especially within a decade. I'd give anything to go back to having McCain/Stupid Spice as the opposition ticket.", '>>{Glorfindel212} : > corey booker is her bitch, and he\'s being groomed to be the next president. I only know that because trump won. What the fuck are you even saying ? "Trump is good because by lighting the house on fire, he forces people to notice the fact fire burns things". That\'s so incredibly stupid, I hope you realize it. Everyone told you fire burns things, but you still insisted to light it on fire. And now you tell me that, thanks god you were there, if not for you NO ONE would have known fire burns things ! >When obama was president nobody cared about the establishment You created this propaganda-word of yours, but every time I talk to a Trump Supporter, EVERY TIME, they hold contradictory views on everything and especially on this. Trump appointed establishment, and Trump supporter don\'t give a flying fuck about it. GS people ? No fucks. Tillerson ? No fucks. The rest of them, including Devos ? NO FUCKS...because muh freedom of schools. Those people are essentially to stupid to realize that the freedom to buy a Mazerrati is worth nothing when you will never have the money to do so - especially fucklord supreme, Ryan. >for fucks sake he got the usa in 7 wars and nobody cares.. Yeah, why not 14 or even 100 while you are at it ? It\'s like conservative forget they started and created the entire mess that exists currently in the ME by waging war on baseless claims. But muh patriotism I guess. Obama isn\'t white at all on this, but accusing him to wage war is beyond lunacy.', '>>{ElCaptainRon} : Pence and his wife, First Lady of Indiana Karen Pence,who was born man but after surgery became a woman. Article on Pence from wikipedia', '>>{Glorfindel212} : Ah the infamous "you guys said racist were racists, and stupids were stupids, it\'s your fault". The only reason you guys won is because the country has become stupid and delusioned enough to believe what you just wrote. I see you guys coming in this thread with your pre-digested propaganda (aka, Trump saved us by setting the house on fire), but it\'s obviously so transparent it\'s fucking sad.', ">>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Haven't you seen MSNBCs latest contributor , George Clooney ?", '>>{mathieu_delarue} : If Romney is a Republican then the "GOP" in existence now is actually something else.', '>>{zeronirvana} : Can you not be liberal and hate hillary? I mean is that really not a thing? Is the group think of the left so demanding that your lib card gets pulled for expressing an opinion?', ">>{kalabawins2} : Romney would not save succeeded. He didn't last term and he wouldnt have been nominated this time. He needs to get past it. This meglamania attitude, that he is better, shows how narcisistic he is. He needs to stop. Its over and hes still in denial. Rehab time......", '>>{wandost4} : Mitt would have been a savior this year, except that the Republican Party is busy pushing out any moderates, and going farther and farther to the extreme right wing. As a matter of fact, some Republicans are already discussing how they plan to try to impeach Hillary Clinton.', '>>{ThatAssholeMrWhite} : And their god is a movie star famous for playing aside a literal chimpanzee.', '>>{Robotlollipops} : And says some pretty weird shit about his own daughter.', '>>{ekwanto1} : Jeb Bush knocked Romney from the race this time around, stealing all the big donors Romney would have needed to run. Then Jeb failed epicly, blowing $100 million and never gaining any traction in the primaries. So this time it would be appropriate to blame Bush.', '>>{cmorgasm} : As an Indiana resident let me just say, FUCK MIKE PENCE.', ">>{Trumpbart} : Yep. If Kasich or Cruz couldn't do it, Romney couldn't either.", '>>{GuruOfGravity} : Dear Mitt, stop agonizing, and consider yourself lucky you escaped the public humiliation Trump would have unleashed on you.', ">>{dyzo-blue} : Trump's campaign did say only White Men would be considered for the role. So for once they didn't flip-flop.", '>>{DebussySIMiami} : Pence is a great pick for a candidate who is great at hating Muslims and Mexicans, but needs a little help hating gays and women.', '>>{1800Feelsbadman} : Chances Romney beat Trump in a Republican Primary 0.0%', '>>{Boxy310} : Pro-treason, though, from the looks of these Russian connections and Cuba embargo dodging.', '>>{alephnul} : Not so popular with the ladies. Since he signed a particularly odious anti abortion bill last year the lady folk in his home state have been calling and emailing him to let him know how their periods are going because he seems to be so interested in them.', '>>{deezmutts} : Actually he was against Trumps suggestion to ban all muslims coming into the US.', '>>{johnfrance} : I bet he does. I bet he does..', ">>{Jzkqm} : As an Indiana resident, it's pretty bad. He's too right-wing for conservatives in this state, and Indiana is decently conservative. Look up RFRA and his anti-abortion bill from these past couple years.", ">>{nightandshade} : He said >Obama, hillary, and bashing the ACA You're being intentionally obtuse.", '>>{JasonDavidWongPargin} : It\'s definitely the smartest of his short-list picks (Christie and Gingrich both poll horribly), I do think Trump is getting better advice these days. He went with the "boring" candidate which is what he needed, to reassure people he\'s not nuts.', '>>{kutwijf} : We wondered too. So why again did you not??', '>>{Knightmare4469} : I missed the 7 declarations of war. Care to fill me in?', '>>{stevebeyten} : To be fair Clooney probably has more world knowledge and experience than half of FOXs actual news team...', '>>{Cheeseaholic419} : It shouldn\'t be. Women aren\'t immune to sexism. Especially if they grow up in a conservative or highly religious community. There is still a pervasive notion amongst such groups that a women\'s place is in the home. I first was exposed to this when I met some of my distant cousins for the first time and was basically treated as a pariah because I was 23 and still unmarried and childless *because I was in graduate school*. This was in a super blue state too, btw. Then I noticed how bad it was during the women\'s march when all of the comments about articles from our local newspaper on Facebook had comments like "lots of husbands and children are going hungry tonight!" "These bitches just can\'t get a husband!" Etc. These are women that live in a *city* in a blue state. It was very eye opening.', '>>{drew2057} : Women keeping other women down has been a very prevalent theme in society for a very long time.', ">>{Nameless_Archon} : Bad. Pence appears to have wanted to be a pastor and got elected governor instead. He signed the infamous [RFRA bill legalizing anti-gay discrimination](http://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/video/gov-mike-pence-religious-freedom-law-29987447) in Indiana that got nationwide scorn and cost the city money and business and prestige. He signed a [vastly overreaching anti-abortion bill that's already been overturned](https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/insulting-new-abortion-law-forces-women-to-pay-for-fetus-funerals) that forced women to pay for funerals after an abortion and forbid abortion in the event of fetal deformity (eg. forced to carry your destined-for-stillbirth child to term then disgorge it to die on the table instead of getting an abortion). Pence does not care about the rights of citizens, unless those citizens are white, straight, and male. Period. (And if you're just getting your period, ladies, [don't forget to tell Pence](http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/04/08/473518239/periods-as-protest-indiana-women-call-governor-to-talk-about-menstrual-cycles). He's very interested to hear from you.)", ">>{Nameless_Archon} : If you think picking Pence shows Trump isn't nuts, you don't know anything about Pence's record in Indiana. Pastor Pence is not well loved in the state, and with good reason.", '>>{Not_Cleaver} : Part of me hopes sometime next week, he decides to endorse McMullin. It would all but guarantee Utah would go purple. And would probably convince me, a conservative leaning towards Johnson, to vote for McMullin instead. Unfortunately, it would also guarantee Hillary the election. But it would be worth it just to maybe help down ballot Reublicans and fire up non-Trumpian conservatives again.', ">>{moxy801} : Which just shows why its a good thing he lost in '12 - he's clueless.", ">>{Trump-Tzu} : As a Trump supporter here's why pence is a bad pick. * Pro TPP * Very against gays * Disagrees with trumps Muslim ban * In the early 2000's he publicly proclaimed that smoking doesn't kill people. * He doesn't belive in evolution Seriously this adds nothing to the ticket, Trump was already winning 3 out of 4 evangelicals.", '>>{zeronirvana} : Ok so can you not approve of obama, hillary or the aca and still be liberal? Serious question. I think this you are either 100% with us or against us attitude is dangerous. No matter which side you are on. But party lines mean alot more i guess.', '>>{PresidentChaos} : I wonder if Noot Gingrich is desperately calling up FoxNews, trying to get his job back.', ">>{nightandshade} : Sure maybe, but did you look at OP's post history? It would be like me asking you if you can still be republican if you want universal healthcare, universal basic income, hate Reagan, and once gave Marx a blowjob.", '>>{MyPSAcct} : Women who vote for sexism are just as much to blame as the men who vote for sexism.', ">>{Brytard} : He didn't stay out of the election. Doesn't anybody remember the Trump vs Romeny battle back in March/April?", ">>{OliveItMaggle} : And it's all downhill from here. Have fun.", '>>{JamesDelgado} : My friends put me in their Private Hall of Fame respect me too!', '>>{PresidentChaos} : Champagne is being poured at Clinton Headquarters!!!', '>>{Ashley8777} : At least celebrities only endorse liberal candidates, how many celebrities have become Republican politicians? Clearly the party enamoured by Hollywood is the Republican party', ">>{Ashley8777} : He's better for anarchists because he's going to destroy our country. They're bitter they aren't in charge anymore and they're going to take everyone out in a murder suicide.", '>>{greg19735} : > anti-moderate. exactly. The only thing Romney would do is steal votes from Jeb, a few Rubio and a few Cruz.', '>>{blueshirtfanatic41} : Not to mention his wife is a renowned international human rights lawyer', ">>{reedemerofsouls} : I hope you're not implying Cruz is moderate. Hell, Rubio certainly isn't.", '>>{reedemerofsouls} : I mean... He probably would not have won the nomination in 2016 and he actually did win it in 2012. So...', '>>{greg19735} : No, only that they were some of the more popular establishment republcians.', '>>{TryAndFindmeLine} : I\'ve never heard a liberal refer to themselves as a "lib". *Checks profile*, yup, full of posts to T_D', ">>{archaeolinuxgeek} : It was **one** time. And if anybody is worthy of a little head, it's the men who starred in Duck Soup.", ">>{JABRONI_ZINDABAD} : He definitely could have rubbed Obama's nose in it regarding Obama's incredibly foolish comments about Russia in the 2012 Presidential debates. Since then Russia have invaded their neighbour, cracked down on any semblance of the rule of law and press freedom, and have attempted to manipulate the results of the US election. *But* if Romney was the GOP candidate instead of Trump, then Russia wouldn't be attempting to help the GOP to win and would probably have stayed neutral, so that argument wouldn't be quite as strong in the alternate timeline as it is in this one. Omg paradox. I voted for Obama in 2012 but over that one particular issue I always thought Obama was completely wrong and Romney was completely right. It's amazing how successful Russia has been at weaponising America's conspiratards and morons against its own democracy.", '>>{reedemerofsouls} : Hillary is a lock anywya imo. The question is McMullin or Trump in Utah. Johnson is toast.', '>>{Not_Cleaver} : I know. But I want Johnson to crack five percent of the total vote.', '>>{stevebeyten} : Well, we got franken. But yeah the other side has elected "Hollywood elites" as president 3 times now', '>>{rapsney} : Did they really just try the "im rubber you are glue" defense? That shit hasnt worked since third grade', ">>{JustGotOffOfTheTrain} : The grass is always greener. Everyone always thinks that the people who aren't running will be great candidates, until they start running.", ">>{overlordpotatoe} : That's going to be their problem now going forward. Being openly bigoted can win you the primary because it sells well to their base, but at this point it's difficult to win an election with that kind of rhetoric.", '>>{KokonutMonkey} : I can just imagine it Romney dealing with Trump\'s masterful debate rhetoric. "If Mitt Romney would make such a great president, why did he lose to Obama in 2012? Why aren\'t you president Mitt?"', '>>{WiEaglesFi} : Romney is a centrist. So\'s Hillary. We seem to be kind split into thirds as a country. Some of us like the far right, some the middle, and some the far left. The far right has a political party now: the GOP, the political center has Hillary "Republicans hate me b/c I\'m what they see when they look in a mirror" Clinton represents the middle. But the left doesn\'t have a major political party to represent us. Romney was the governor of Massachusetts. He\'s not a super conservative guy compared to the rest of his party.', ">>{Declan_McManus} : Yeah, I'd sleep better if the worst case outcome of this election for my political views was only Romney instead of Trump, but I don't see what he'd bring to the primary that Jeb didn't already.", ">>{OnthefarWind} : It's so hilarious because just one look at your post history (not even scrolling down) that is blatantly not true.", '>>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : I mean if ur gonna be a fake liberal on Reddit just to troll - at least create another account . Jeez . "Oh shit what is comment history? You mean my posts are saved in one place ! ? ಠ╭╮ಠ', '>>{Beecakeband} : When Tiffany was a year old he wondered what sized breasts she would have', ">>{mathieu_delarue} : But a Republic is about averages. It's working properly when it averages out to someone like Hillary Clinton. If anybody was happy then somebody else would be getting fucked. Also forgot to say the GOP is miles away from that middle. It's not a national party anymore.", '>>{WiEaglesFi} : I really don\'t see it that way. I think Hillary is the product of a system that uses first past the post voting. It encourages picking the "lesser of two evils" which, if you remember that Trump used to be a big Clinton donor or read the Podesta emails about Hillary\'s campaign working to get Donald the Rep nomination, seem like total bullshit. (Anyone reading this, please watch [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8XOZJkozfI) video) I think Hillary is the pro-corporate candidate masquerading as the left-winger and people are buying it. Her record (pro-NAFTA, pro-throwing blacks in jails, pro-media consolidation, pro-removing Wall St. regulations, Pro-TPP, pro getting more money from Wall St. than any other candidate this year, pro-being against legal weed "in every sense," Pro-taking the MOST money from companies that want to KILL net neutrality, and so on and so on... She\'s not the "average." She\'s what you get when rich people get to decide how your ballot is structured and counted. Don\'t get me wrong. I think Trump is even worse, but Hillary is a Republican who is getting liberals to vote to fuck themselves economically b/c they saw a headline once about Jill Stein being anti-vax and never watched the video to see that her point was that the FDA is under too much corporate control and that there are justifiable fears that they green light dangerous drugs b/c corporations pay them to. I think Hillary is for Democrats what Dubya was for Republicans. They both get people to vote against their economic interests b/c of social issues.', '>>{Robotlollipops} : Oh fuck. I stand all kinds of corrected.', '>>{Beecakeband} : Unfortunately yup. First time someone told me I thought it was fake but sadly no he really is that sick', ">>{GaryNMaine} : Simple enough: he wouldn't have had any more luck than the others against Trump. Trump is the culmination of thirty years of GOP propagandizing their base into believing that only the GOP can run the country properly while, essentially, being mostly charlatans and liars.", ">>{concerned_thirdparty} : you forget that stein isn't an option because she's horribly unqualified. and has just about as much experience as trump. (which is NONE) and she's just as much of a ignorant demagogue as trump too. otherwise you are spot on about most everything else.", '>>{WiEaglesFi} : I disagree, powerfully, that Stein is less qualified than Hillary. Hillary has been in public life and national politics much longer, but her decisions in that time tell me that her experience is negative. She thought the 94 crime bill that increased (mostly black) prison population was a good idea, she loved her husband\'s destruction of welfare, she liked the bill that took us from 50 media companies to 6, she, even to this day, thinks Glass-Steagal should stay repealed, she favors trade policies that force American workers to compete with slaves...I could go on and on. She\'s a corporate shill that does what rich people tell her to. I think Jill Stein gets so much hate based on headlines but that no one has watched the videos that generate the headlines. She\'s a doctor making subtle, but important, points, and our modern corporate media isn\'t equipped to handle that. Her supposed "anti vax" position comes from a video where she bemoans the corporate power over the FDA and wishes for better drug safety regulations. It\'s a hit job because she\'s an actual liberal and people in charge want us to pick between Hillary and Trump, the Republican and the Fascist. Because the political left doesn\'t get a choice...because fuck you.', ">>{nibbles200} : A lot more than you'd imagine. This is anecdotal, but my perception is that this demographic is the heaviest user base of online social media. When the data they have allows them to know you better than you know yourself, we become their pawns.", ">>{boobityskoobity} : I think so too. But I think that's also the result of the GOP catering to racist nut jobs for a few decades, as opposed to Romney being a terrible candidate (I'm pretty liberal, but I don't hate Romney).", ">>{TK2510} : Going by your superb logic, you're obviously some individual who's been paid for work at one point or the other - why would anyone care what you have to say?", '>>{MortWellian} : I can do you slightly better than anecdotal. [Pew](http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/) found that a [majority](http://www.journalism.org/2016/02/04/the-2016-presidential-campaign-a-news-event-thats-hard-to-miss/) now get some of their news from social media, with more women than men on them. Would be nice if FB released their internals, considering they announced changes a week after the election they seem to know how they unintentionally bamboozled the nation. Not gonna hold my breath for it.', '>>{HatchetHarry362} : Have you ever listened to Clooney speak? The guy is an idiot with a warped worldview. I am still waiting for him to move to Canada like he said he was once Trump won.', '>>{Akoustyk} : Well a lot of the time famous people are pretty smart, which is how they managed to earn their fame. Tina fey is a writer, and therefore falls into that category. She is a successful intelligent woman, and for a lot of people, is a much better authority to listen to than their peers.', '>>{ImSuperHighRightNow} : Agreed 100%... Remember that it is usually corporations or billionaires like the koch brothers that have funded the Republicans in the last decade as well. I think what we are seeing is a prime example why citizens united is so dangerous and why we absolutely have to have a constitutional amendment or the supreme court to over turn it.', ">>{Akoustyk} : Its amazing to me that you still don't know what trump is. Dont worry, shit will get plenty more fucked up. Maybe you'll clue in eventually.", ">>{32LeftatT10} : The Attention Merchants is a great book about modern advertising I just started reading. Early on in the 1920's the ad agencies hired feminists to help target the house wife.", '>>{Evenfall} : Hillary deserves much of the blame for women turning away from her. After all it was her campaign that pushed the "special place in hell" and "voting for Bernie to chase boys" narratives in the primaries. Then just assuming all women will vote for her because she too is a woman. Her campaign was a wreck and ultimately, Russian meddling included, she deserves the blame for the loss. You can\'t belittle people and then expect them to vote for you. College educated women recognized that. That said I would not have voted for Trump either.', '>>{MortWellian} : Will check it out, I can recommend the docu The Merchants of Doubt for those wanting to watch something on the topic. Does it cover who decided to call cigs "freedom torches" to get women to start smoking? As soon as I hear the word "freedom" tagged on to an issue my ears always perk up to the bs that accompanies it.', '>>{almeras} : > he got the usa in 7 wars Please list these wars.', '>>{Jynx3} : Because his god wants a liberal Democrat to win. Romans 13.', '>>{32LeftatT10} : Yeah that was one of the first stories getting feminists to believe they were taking part in a great movement by breaking the taboo on women smoking in public. The documentary Merchants of Doubt kind of underwhelmed me, it jumped back and forth and went on strange tangents without really making an overall point.', '>>{almeras} : Can you list the dates of declaration? I would like to do more research on these wars.', ">>{frogandbanjo} : >If anybody was happy then somebody else would be getting fucked. Yeah, the ultra-rich seem super unhappy with all the compromises they've had to make over the past few decades.", ">>{MortWellian} : I can understand, I tend to be forgiving when it comes to editing. I'm a big fan of Adam Curtis on the topic, but he meanders a bit as well.", '>>{Lance_Legstrong} : Has this board just become a trump bashing sub? Is there an alternative politics board?', '>>{forever_stalone} : You can go to T_D if it makes you feel any better.', '>>{forever_stalone} : You could visit historically neutral news websites such as routers, associated press or even the bbc. But you will also find plenty of negative stuff about Trump there as well. Has it occurred to you that maybe the negative press is because Trump is not doing such a great job?', '>>{drewkungfu} : - /r/NeutralPolitics - /r/PoliticalDiscussion - /r/geopolitics I subscribe to these as they seem a lot more level headed... though admittedly am quite a fan of this circle jerk.', '>>{liberationation} : Literally that has nothing to do with the rise of Trump, the Kochs don\'t like Trump at all and wanted the GOP to move in a more "socially don\'t give a damn" direction.', '>>{Cindernubblebutt} : Then he remembers...."Oh right...I lost"', ">>{drewkungfu} : > The only reason you guys won is because the country has become stupid and delusioned enough to believe what you just wrote. I'd say they won by archaic technical rules where 80,000 people spread across 3 states decided for the nation via Electoral College that failed to do the Job of an EC and voted Party over Country, and Gerrymandering, Voter Suppression, and other undemocratic tactics for means regarding the Congress.", '>>{ImSuperHighRightNow} : > Literally that has nothing to do with the rise of Trump Disagreed. The reason Trump is able to take advantage and scam so many voters into siding with him is exactly due to manipulations from Citizens United. Koch Brothers have been moving the GOP electorate in this direction for a long time, Trump just came along and took advantage of it.', ">>{Glorfindel212} : Let's be clear here. Even if Clinton had won, the fact that it was this close in the first place, regardless of who won, is god damn crazy. One could gather a whole web site of Trump blunders for the whole campaign, including but not limited to sayings that would have ruined any other campaign in an instant. Trump isn't the problem. The problem is that the GOP achieved its dream of turning around half the populace into completely brainwashed people devoid of any critical thinking. This is the scary part. You make Trump go away, and next election you get the exact same reason. A core part of those people, I'd say around 20% of the voting mass, are so entrenched in this that they would sooner elect litteraly Satan over Clinton. When 20% of your voting mass is decided to go for political suicide, what can you do ? I mean, shit. The Republicans couldn't pass their OWN health care bill because it wasn't radical enough in their own party. This is something not even The Onion would write. This is insanity. When talking to supporters, those guys declare without flinching they want universal coverage and that's why they voted Trump. I mean, how far down the rabbit hole can you go ? There is for some of them no going back until they die of old age, pestering everyone but themselves.", ">>{FunkyTown313} : I think you're pointing the gun the wrong direction. This sub only posts news articles on American politics. A majority of American politics these days focuses on everything trump does/doesn't do. The fact that they're negative toward trump is a reflection of the content available and of the work he's doing.", ">>{JohnHenryAaron} : It is insincere to the point of absurdity to say those messages were pushed by the Clinton campaign. The first did happen at a Clinton campaign event, but it was Madeleine Albright and it was something that was said off the cuff. It's something one person not formally part of the campaign said exactly once. And the second was from Gloria Steinem, who had no association with the Clinton campaign at all.", '>>{notachode} : You are clearly uninformed, which makes you part of the problem. As u/JohnHenryAaron pointed out, you are wrong in attributing those statements to Clinton.', ">>{notachode} : You're being downvoted, but you are 100% correct. Many people just can't be bothered to take this nuanced understanding of why Trump was able to succeed. It's much easier, and requires less critical thinking, to just paint with a broad brush and villainize all of his voters.", '>>{notachode} : This type of tribalism is part of the problem.', '>>{notachode} : Trump deserves all the bashing he is getting. The issue with this sub is the discourse on Trump voters. Most people aren\'t able to discuss the nuance of the problem and stop thinking at "bigot". Its just easier to engage in this "all good" or "all bad" type of thinking. The issue is that this demonization only further perpetuates the type of climate that allowed Trump supporters to develop in the first place. But again, that seems to be too nuanced for many of the posters here.', '>>{notachode} : Tina Fey is a great actor and writer. But whether you agree or disagree with her opinion - what makes it worth sharing? She is only one person, and nothing about her career grants her opinion any more weight than the majority of redditors in this thread. This applies to all celebrity political opinions.', '>>{Glorfindel212} : It\'s not about loyalty to a group. It\'s about the fabric of reality. Do you call mentally sane people "tribalists" for not listening to the guy who thinks he is Napoleon ? Of course not. This is not about a political divide that can exist between any party because some issue is actually hard to decide at some point (let\'s say, should we try to go to Mars right now ? as a good proposition of this kind). We are at a point where people are entrenching themselves in this cult. To some of them, there are NO possible case where Trump is ever wrong. They are creating a tribe and the rest is de facto, because they created a tribe (a structure of loyalty), excluded from it. There is no tribalism for truth, or logic, or the meaning of words. But there is a cult of one man that is on the same theological level as the Pope (by definition, he can\'t be wrong, and every move he does that appears to be bad is in fact a good move no one can see the effect of yet). This is the level of thinking that goes not surprisingly pretty well with religion (god does everything for you, and if it appears not to, it\'s because god\'s ways are hard do decipher). To those people, the only thing left to be done is to show them that the world opposes with the utmost vehemence their way of thinking. To make it appear what it is : insane. A man that thinks the earth is flat will not be moved by equations that are "sensible" arguments. He will move only by seing it with his very eyes. Those people are by definition not sensible to subtlety, you need something that is a logical shake up to wake them up. /rant', ">>{notachode} : And tell me what this approach will accomplish, other than granting yourself a sense of superiority? When, in the history of mankind, has a group of humans responded well to being told that they are wrong and that they need to be quiet? This isn't about who is right and who is wrong. It's about healing the divisions that have led to this type of extremism - not perpetuating them. It is very unfortunate that so many people have such a simple grasp of the problems we are currently facing.", '>>{Glorfindel212} : >And tell me what this approach will accomplish, other than granting yourself a sense of superiority? This is what you don\'t understand. I don\'t care about superiority. I\'m not a logical god that exists above others. Every one makes mistakes, the problem is that proposition is not shared by those that need it most. This approach will accomplish the shock it needs to provide : when you lay out the fact that in order to fix schools, we have to defund them, and say this to the supporters, they actually react. Something shocks them. It\'s in fact a shocking proposition. I\'ve discussed with a number of them : if you start by telling to them that you agree with them that fire actually makes things wet in order to prove them it burns, it will be this much harder to bring them back because obviously once you legitimated a point of view that is this far off from reality, it\'s only consolidated. They are actively wanting that we shift the norm. I\'ve seen people start argument on supporter sub by postulating that they agree on stuff that was obviously bonkers in order to try to reason : the problem is that now you shifted the problem to the details of the bonkers claim, and the bonkers claim is the new "basis of discussion". >When, in the history of mankind, has a group of humans responded well to being told that they are wrong and that they need to be quiet? This is a fallacy : everything that exists in history is not a repetition of what did happen. If that were the case, nothing would ever take place but the same event again and again. But yeah, as an anecdote, an interesting event is when nazi soldiers were shown images of the concentration camps. >This isn\'t about who is right and who is wrong. It\'s about healing the divisions that have led to this type of extremism - not perpetuating them. It is, sadly. And that\'s the problem. It used to be harder to tell, by far. You are falling for the classic "middle ground" fallacy : the truth has to be in the middle. Here is the problem : if opinions are placed on a segment and the far right is removed from reality, there is a good chance that the middle ground you seek is in fact in crazy territory. That means that accepting to "settle" is in fact accepting to conduct a crazy policy on the sole merit that it\'s slightly less crazy that the original policy. The problem is that several factors, among which politics being a sport, and ideological purity tests have made the healing impossible, as reasoning with someone that doesn\'t listen to rational argument is a pure waste of time. At this point, for some, only emotional shock might work. >It is very unfortunate that so many people have such a simple grasp of the problems we are currently facing. I\'m not sure what you are referencing here, but this not what it used to be. The scope of this is simply unpresidented (sic). This is why I think, just as Bin Laden already won, that Putin already won.', '>>{Berglekutt} : You realize by abstaining you gave tacit approval to whoever won the election right? How are you enjoying trumps policies you helped make possible?']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{winstonjpenobscot} : He would have been road kill like all the other Republican nomination candidates. The party base is now anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim, anti-science and *definitely* anti-moderate.', ">>{SaltHash} : The GOP's red meat base would have drooled as they watched Trump call Romney names like weak and loser. He should be glad that he stayed out of that crazy clown car.", '>>{IDFSHILL} : What\'s funny is Trump used to call Romney weak and claim he "choked but now Trump is losing to a weaker candidate than Obama was by a larger margin.', '>>{Vesstair} : Nah. Trump just would have used "obamneycare" to its full effect.', '>>{ImSuperHighRightNow} : Remember when the GOP lost in 2012 and the party produced that* report that said the GOP would continue to lose national elections unless they appealed to more minorities? I honestly think this is why Trump won the primary, all the other candidates were at least *trying* to expand their appeal to minorities, Trump ignored the report and did the complete opposite. I think Romey would have fallen into the same trap and lost to Trump too.', '>>{santac311} : There is an opportunity for a great SNL sketch here. Bring back Jason Sudekis and make this happen. Kinda like Deep Thoughts with Jack Handey combined with Rob Schneider\'s Copier guy sketch. "Aye! Mitt. Dog on the roof.. Mitt.:: gotta take a...Mitt.. oh, yeah. Mitt..."', ">>{LordOverThis} : God I never thought I'd see the day where I'd miss having faces like Romney or McCain as the Republican nominees. Especially within a decade. I'd give anything to go back to having McCain/Stupid Spice as the opposition ticket.", '>>{mathieu_delarue} : If Romney is a Republican then the "GOP" in existence now is actually something else.', ">>{kalabawins2} : Romney would not save succeeded. He didn't last term and he wouldnt have been nominated this time. He needs to get past it. This meglamania attitude, that he is better, shows how narcisistic he is. He needs to stop. Its over and hes still in denial. Rehab time......", '>>{wandost4} : Mitt would have been a savior this year, except that the Republican Party is busy pushing out any moderates, and going farther and farther to the extreme right wing. As a matter of fact, some Republicans are already discussing how they plan to try to impeach Hillary Clinton.', '>>{ekwanto1} : Jeb Bush knocked Romney from the race this time around, stealing all the big donors Romney would have needed to run. Then Jeb failed epicly, blowing $100 million and never gaining any traction in the primaries. So this time it would be appropriate to blame Bush.', ">>{Trumpbart} : Yep. If Kasich or Cruz couldn't do it, Romney couldn't either.", '>>{GuruOfGravity} : Dear Mitt, stop agonizing, and consider yourself lucky you escaped the public humiliation Trump would have unleashed on you.', '>>{1800Feelsbadman} : Chances Romney beat Trump in a Republican Primary 0.0%', '>>{Boxy310} : Pro-treason, though, from the looks of these Russian connections and Cuba embargo dodging.', '>>{johnfrance} : I bet he does. I bet he does..', '>>{kutwijf} : We wondered too. So why again did you not??', '>>{Not_Cleaver} : Part of me hopes sometime next week, he decides to endorse McMullin. It would all but guarantee Utah would go purple. And would probably convince me, a conservative leaning towards Johnson, to vote for McMullin instead. Unfortunately, it would also guarantee Hillary the election. But it would be worth it just to maybe help down ballot Reublicans and fire up non-Trumpian conservatives again.', ">>{moxy801} : Which just shows why its a good thing he lost in '12 - he's clueless.", ">>{Brytard} : He didn't stay out of the election. Doesn't anybody remember the Trump vs Romeny battle back in March/April?", '>>{greg19735} : > anti-moderate. exactly. The only thing Romney would do is steal votes from Jeb, a few Rubio and a few Cruz.', ">>{reedemerofsouls} : I hope you're not implying Cruz is moderate. Hell, Rubio certainly isn't.", '>>{reedemerofsouls} : I mean... He probably would not have won the nomination in 2016 and he actually did win it in 2012. So...', '>>{greg19735} : No, only that they were some of the more popular establishment republcians.', ">>{JABRONI_ZINDABAD} : He definitely could have rubbed Obama's nose in it regarding Obama's incredibly foolish comments about Russia in the 2012 Presidential debates. Since then Russia have invaded their neighbour, cracked down on any semblance of the rule of law and press freedom, and have attempted to manipulate the results of the US election. *But* if Romney was the GOP candidate instead of Trump, then Russia wouldn't be attempting to help the GOP to win and would probably have stayed neutral, so that argument wouldn't be quite as strong in the alternate timeline as it is in this one. Omg paradox. I voted for Obama in 2012 but over that one particular issue I always thought Obama was completely wrong and Romney was completely right. It's amazing how successful Russia has been at weaponising America's conspiratards and morons against its own democracy.", '>>{reedemerofsouls} : Hillary is a lock anywya imo. The question is McMullin or Trump in Utah. Johnson is toast.', '>>{Not_Cleaver} : I know. But I want Johnson to crack five percent of the total vote.', ">>{JustGotOffOfTheTrain} : The grass is always greener. Everyone always thinks that the people who aren't running will be great candidates, until they start running.", ">>{overlordpotatoe} : That's going to be their problem now going forward. Being openly bigoted can win you the primary because it sells well to their base, but at this point it's difficult to win an election with that kind of rhetoric.", '>>{KokonutMonkey} : I can just imagine it Romney dealing with Trump\'s masterful debate rhetoric. "If Mitt Romney would make such a great president, why did he lose to Obama in 2012? Why aren\'t you president Mitt?"', '>>{WiEaglesFi} : Romney is a centrist. So\'s Hillary. We seem to be kind split into thirds as a country. Some of us like the far right, some the middle, and some the far left. The far right has a political party now: the GOP, the political center has Hillary "Republicans hate me b/c I\'m what they see when they look in a mirror" Clinton represents the middle. But the left doesn\'t have a major political party to represent us. Romney was the governor of Massachusetts. He\'s not a super conservative guy compared to the rest of his party.', ">>{Declan_McManus} : Yeah, I'd sleep better if the worst case outcome of this election for my political views was only Romney instead of Trump, but I don't see what he'd bring to the primary that Jeb didn't already.", ">>{mathieu_delarue} : But a Republic is about averages. It's working properly when it averages out to someone like Hillary Clinton. If anybody was happy then somebody else would be getting fucked. Also forgot to say the GOP is miles away from that middle. It's not a national party anymore.", '>>{WiEaglesFi} : I really don\'t see it that way. I think Hillary is the product of a system that uses first past the post voting. It encourages picking the "lesser of two evils" which, if you remember that Trump used to be a big Clinton donor or read the Podesta emails about Hillary\'s campaign working to get Donald the Rep nomination, seem like total bullshit. (Anyone reading this, please watch [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8XOZJkozfI) video) I think Hillary is the pro-corporate candidate masquerading as the left-winger and people are buying it. Her record (pro-NAFTA, pro-throwing blacks in jails, pro-media consolidation, pro-removing Wall St. regulations, Pro-TPP, pro getting more money from Wall St. than any other candidate this year, pro-being against legal weed "in every sense," Pro-taking the MOST money from companies that want to KILL net neutrality, and so on and so on... She\'s not the "average." She\'s what you get when rich people get to decide how your ballot is structured and counted. Don\'t get me wrong. I think Trump is even worse, but Hillary is a Republican who is getting liberals to vote to fuck themselves economically b/c they saw a headline once about Jill Stein being anti-vax and never watched the video to see that her point was that the FDA is under too much corporate control and that there are justifiable fears that they green light dangerous drugs b/c corporations pay them to. I think Hillary is for Democrats what Dubya was for Republicans. They both get people to vote against their economic interests b/c of social issues.', ">>{GaryNMaine} : Simple enough: he wouldn't have had any more luck than the others against Trump. Trump is the culmination of thirty years of GOP propagandizing their base into believing that only the GOP can run the country properly while, essentially, being mostly charlatans and liars.", ">>{concerned_thirdparty} : you forget that stein isn't an option because she's horribly unqualified. and has just about as much experience as trump. (which is NONE) and she's just as much of a ignorant demagogue as trump too. otherwise you are spot on about most everything else.", '>>{WiEaglesFi} : I disagree, powerfully, that Stein is less qualified than Hillary. Hillary has been in public life and national politics much longer, but her decisions in that time tell me that her experience is negative. She thought the 94 crime bill that increased (mostly black) prison population was a good idea, she loved her husband\'s destruction of welfare, she liked the bill that took us from 50 media companies to 6, she, even to this day, thinks Glass-Steagal should stay repealed, she favors trade policies that force American workers to compete with slaves...I could go on and on. She\'s a corporate shill that does what rich people tell her to. I think Jill Stein gets so much hate based on headlines but that no one has watched the videos that generate the headlines. She\'s a doctor making subtle, but important, points, and our modern corporate media isn\'t equipped to handle that. Her supposed "anti vax" position comes from a video where she bemoans the corporate power over the FDA and wishes for better drug safety regulations. It\'s a hit job because she\'s an actual liberal and people in charge want us to pick between Hillary and Trump, the Republican and the Fascist. Because the political left doesn\'t get a choice...because fuck you.', ">>{boobityskoobity} : I think so too. But I think that's also the result of the GOP catering to racist nut jobs for a few decades, as opposed to Romney being a terrible candidate (I'm pretty liberal, but I don't hate Romney).", '>>{ImSuperHighRightNow} : Agreed 100%... Remember that it is usually corporations or billionaires like the koch brothers that have funded the Republicans in the last decade as well. I think what we are seeing is a prime example why citizens united is so dangerous and why we absolutely have to have a constitutional amendment or the supreme court to over turn it.', '>>{Jynx3} : Because his god wants a liberal Democrat to win. Romans 13.', ">>{frogandbanjo} : >If anybody was happy then somebody else would be getting fucked. Yeah, the ultra-rich seem super unhappy with all the compromises they've had to make over the past few decades.", '>>{liberationation} : Literally that has nothing to do with the rise of Trump, the Kochs don\'t like Trump at all and wanted the GOP to move in a more "socially don\'t give a damn" direction.', '>>{Cindernubblebutt} : Then he remembers...."Oh right...I lost"', '>>{ImSuperHighRightNow} : > Literally that has nothing to do with the rise of Trump Disagreed. The reason Trump is able to take advantage and scam so many voters into siding with him is exactly due to manipulations from Citizens United. Koch Brothers have been moving the GOP electorate in this direction for a long time, Trump just came along and took advantage of it.'], ['>>{drakeb55} : Tina Fey tells college-educated white women who voted for Trump: ‘You can’t look away’', '>>{kekus_vult} : It proved you cant look away and ignore the suffering of the midwest or the demagogues will take the country away.', ">>{MortWellian} : After reading this, I'm wondering how much Cambridge Analytica and others narrowcasting on FB had an effect.", '>>{kekus_vult} : That attitude is why Tina Fey lost with her candidate she like you looked away.', ">>{FunfortheLadies} : You've got your head pretty far up your ass.", ">>{FishyFred} : > Trump isn't less of an establishment bitch than hillary Give me a fucking break.", ">>{irwincur} : I'm a lib, I give a shit about what some paid actor has to say... Why the hell do you hold these people with such high regard? It is just odd that the left seems so enamored with fame and not reality.", ">>{AgentOfSPYRAL} : I think more people can name her because she's laughably incompetent, but I dont get the idea that Trump is better for those who are anti establishment.", ">>{zherok} : That's literally who Trump has in office. His secretary of education is a major Republican donor with zero experience in teaching and a massive profit and religiously motivated career in charter schools. This notion of draining the swamp by putting the millionaire and billionaire types who previously bankrolled politicians is crazy. You're just saving them money.", '>>{BenAfleckIsAnOkActor} : Hes in the wwe hall of fame bruh have some respect', ">>{Xanthanum87} : So the article blames women for sexism. That's a first for me.", '>>{stevebeyten} : Lol this is the stupidest trope in politics. Everyone bashes libs for worshipping celebrities but why is it that the minute any celeb comes out as pro right wing, FOX news literally hires them as paid contributors? (See: Stacy dash, Scott baio, Ted nugent) and holds then out as actual authority figures on politics.', ">>{AgentOfSPYRAL} : Well I think incompetence always helps awareness, not sure how much of that is anti establishment or just anti incompetence, although I'm sure there's overlap. Do you have some sources on Booker being groomed? I feel like it's too early for the Ds to really know who they're going with.", '>>{Knightmare4469} : The right literally elected a TV reality show as president, but yea, the liberals are the one who are enamored with fame. 👌 Edited because I misunderstood your post at first.', '>>{Glorfindel212} : > corey booker is her bitch, and he\'s being groomed to be the next president. I only know that because trump won. What the fuck are you even saying ? "Trump is good because by lighting the house on fire, he forces people to notice the fact fire burns things". That\'s so incredibly stupid, I hope you realize it. Everyone told you fire burns things, but you still insisted to light it on fire. And now you tell me that, thanks god you were there, if not for you NO ONE would have known fire burns things ! >When obama was president nobody cared about the establishment You created this propaganda-word of yours, but every time I talk to a Trump Supporter, EVERY TIME, they hold contradictory views on everything and especially on this. Trump appointed establishment, and Trump supporter don\'t give a flying fuck about it. GS people ? No fucks. Tillerson ? No fucks. The rest of them, including Devos ? NO FUCKS...because muh freedom of schools. Those people are essentially to stupid to realize that the freedom to buy a Mazerrati is worth nothing when you will never have the money to do so - especially fucklord supreme, Ryan. >for fucks sake he got the usa in 7 wars and nobody cares.. Yeah, why not 14 or even 100 while you are at it ? It\'s like conservative forget they started and created the entire mess that exists currently in the ME by waging war on baseless claims. But muh patriotism I guess. Obama isn\'t white at all on this, but accusing him to wage war is beyond lunacy.', '>>{Glorfindel212} : Ah the infamous "you guys said racist were racists, and stupids were stupids, it\'s your fault". The only reason you guys won is because the country has become stupid and delusioned enough to believe what you just wrote. I see you guys coming in this thread with your pre-digested propaganda (aka, Trump saved us by setting the house on fire), but it\'s obviously so transparent it\'s fucking sad.', ">>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Haven't you seen MSNBCs latest contributor , George Clooney ?", '>>{zeronirvana} : Can you not be liberal and hate hillary? I mean is that really not a thing? Is the group think of the left so demanding that your lib card gets pulled for expressing an opinion?', '>>{ThatAssholeMrWhite} : And their god is a movie star famous for playing aside a literal chimpanzee.', '>>{Robotlollipops} : And says some pretty weird shit about his own daughter.', ">>{nightandshade} : He said >Obama, hillary, and bashing the ACA You're being intentionally obtuse.", '>>{Knightmare4469} : I missed the 7 declarations of war. Care to fill me in?', '>>{stevebeyten} : To be fair Clooney probably has more world knowledge and experience than half of FOXs actual news team...', '>>{Cheeseaholic419} : It shouldn\'t be. Women aren\'t immune to sexism. Especially if they grow up in a conservative or highly religious community. There is still a pervasive notion amongst such groups that a women\'s place is in the home. I first was exposed to this when I met some of my distant cousins for the first time and was basically treated as a pariah because I was 23 and still unmarried and childless *because I was in graduate school*. This was in a super blue state too, btw. Then I noticed how bad it was during the women\'s march when all of the comments about articles from our local newspaper on Facebook had comments like "lots of husbands and children are going hungry tonight!" "These bitches just can\'t get a husband!" Etc. These are women that live in a *city* in a blue state. It was very eye opening.', '>>{drew2057} : Women keeping other women down has been a very prevalent theme in society for a very long time.', '>>{zeronirvana} : Ok so can you not approve of obama, hillary or the aca and still be liberal? Serious question. I think this you are either 100% with us or against us attitude is dangerous. No matter which side you are on. But party lines mean alot more i guess.', ">>{nightandshade} : Sure maybe, but did you look at OP's post history? It would be like me asking you if you can still be republican if you want universal healthcare, universal basic income, hate Reagan, and once gave Marx a blowjob.", '>>{MyPSAcct} : Women who vote for sexism are just as much to blame as the men who vote for sexism.', '>>{JamesDelgado} : My friends put me in their Private Hall of Fame respect me too!', '>>{Ashley8777} : At least celebrities only endorse liberal candidates, how many celebrities have become Republican politicians? Clearly the party enamoured by Hollywood is the Republican party', ">>{Ashley8777} : He's better for anarchists because he's going to destroy our country. They're bitter they aren't in charge anymore and they're going to take everyone out in a murder suicide.", '>>{blueshirtfanatic41} : Not to mention his wife is a renowned international human rights lawyer', '>>{TryAndFindmeLine} : I\'ve never heard a liberal refer to themselves as a "lib". *Checks profile*, yup, full of posts to T_D', ">>{archaeolinuxgeek} : It was **one** time. And if anybody is worthy of a little head, it's the men who starred in Duck Soup.", '>>{stevebeyten} : Well, we got franken. But yeah the other side has elected "Hollywood elites" as president 3 times now', '>>{rapsney} : Did they really just try the "im rubber you are glue" defense? That shit hasnt worked since third grade', ">>{OnthefarWind} : It's so hilarious because just one look at your post history (not even scrolling down) that is blatantly not true.", '>>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : I mean if ur gonna be a fake liberal on Reddit just to troll - at least create another account . Jeez . "Oh shit what is comment history? You mean my posts are saved in one place ! ? ಠ╭╮ಠ', '>>{Beecakeband} : When Tiffany was a year old he wondered what sized breasts she would have', '>>{Robotlollipops} : Oh fuck. I stand all kinds of corrected.', '>>{Beecakeband} : Unfortunately yup. First time someone told me I thought it was fake but sadly no he really is that sick', ">>{nibbles200} : A lot more than you'd imagine. This is anecdotal, but my perception is that this demographic is the heaviest user base of online social media. When the data they have allows them to know you better than you know yourself, we become their pawns.", ">>{TK2510} : Going by your superb logic, you're obviously some individual who's been paid for work at one point or the other - why would anyone care what you have to say?", '>>{MortWellian} : I can do you slightly better than anecdotal. [Pew](http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/) found that a [majority](http://www.journalism.org/2016/02/04/the-2016-presidential-campaign-a-news-event-thats-hard-to-miss/) now get some of their news from social media, with more women than men on them. Would be nice if FB released their internals, considering they announced changes a week after the election they seem to know how they unintentionally bamboozled the nation. Not gonna hold my breath for it.', '>>{HatchetHarry362} : Have you ever listened to Clooney speak? The guy is an idiot with a warped worldview. I am still waiting for him to move to Canada like he said he was once Trump won.', '>>{Akoustyk} : Well a lot of the time famous people are pretty smart, which is how they managed to earn their fame. Tina fey is a writer, and therefore falls into that category. She is a successful intelligent woman, and for a lot of people, is a much better authority to listen to than their peers.', ">>{Akoustyk} : Its amazing to me that you still don't know what trump is. Dont worry, shit will get plenty more fucked up. Maybe you'll clue in eventually.", ">>{32LeftatT10} : The Attention Merchants is a great book about modern advertising I just started reading. Early on in the 1920's the ad agencies hired feminists to help target the house wife.", '>>{Evenfall} : Hillary deserves much of the blame for women turning away from her. After all it was her campaign that pushed the "special place in hell" and "voting for Bernie to chase boys" narratives in the primaries. Then just assuming all women will vote for her because she too is a woman. Her campaign was a wreck and ultimately, Russian meddling included, she deserves the blame for the loss. You can\'t belittle people and then expect them to vote for you. College educated women recognized that. That said I would not have voted for Trump either.', '>>{MortWellian} : Will check it out, I can recommend the docu The Merchants of Doubt for those wanting to watch something on the topic. Does it cover who decided to call cigs "freedom torches" to get women to start smoking? As soon as I hear the word "freedom" tagged on to an issue my ears always perk up to the bs that accompanies it.', '>>{almeras} : > he got the usa in 7 wars Please list these wars.', '>>{32LeftatT10} : Yeah that was one of the first stories getting feminists to believe they were taking part in a great movement by breaking the taboo on women smoking in public. The documentary Merchants of Doubt kind of underwhelmed me, it jumped back and forth and went on strange tangents without really making an overall point.', '>>{almeras} : Can you list the dates of declaration? I would like to do more research on these wars.', ">>{MortWellian} : I can understand, I tend to be forgiving when it comes to editing. I'm a big fan of Adam Curtis on the topic, but he meanders a bit as well.", '>>{Lance_Legstrong} : Has this board just become a trump bashing sub? Is there an alternative politics board?', '>>{forever_stalone} : You can go to T_D if it makes you feel any better.', '>>{forever_stalone} : You could visit historically neutral news websites such as routers, associated press or even the bbc. But you will also find plenty of negative stuff about Trump there as well. Has it occurred to you that maybe the negative press is because Trump is not doing such a great job?', '>>{drewkungfu} : - /r/NeutralPolitics - /r/PoliticalDiscussion - /r/geopolitics I subscribe to these as they seem a lot more level headed... though admittedly am quite a fan of this circle jerk.', ">>{drewkungfu} : > The only reason you guys won is because the country has become stupid and delusioned enough to believe what you just wrote. I'd say they won by archaic technical rules where 80,000 people spread across 3 states decided for the nation via Electoral College that failed to do the Job of an EC and voted Party over Country, and Gerrymandering, Voter Suppression, and other undemocratic tactics for means regarding the Congress.", ">>{Glorfindel212} : Let's be clear here. Even if Clinton had won, the fact that it was this close in the first place, regardless of who won, is god damn crazy. One could gather a whole web site of Trump blunders for the whole campaign, including but not limited to sayings that would have ruined any other campaign in an instant. Trump isn't the problem. The problem is that the GOP achieved its dream of turning around half the populace into completely brainwashed people devoid of any critical thinking. This is the scary part. You make Trump go away, and next election you get the exact same reason. A core part of those people, I'd say around 20% of the voting mass, are so entrenched in this that they would sooner elect litteraly Satan over Clinton. When 20% of your voting mass is decided to go for political suicide, what can you do ? I mean, shit. The Republicans couldn't pass their OWN health care bill because it wasn't radical enough in their own party. This is something not even The Onion would write. This is insanity. When talking to supporters, those guys declare without flinching they want universal coverage and that's why they voted Trump. I mean, how far down the rabbit hole can you go ? There is for some of them no going back until they die of old age, pestering everyone but themselves.", ">>{FunkyTown313} : I think you're pointing the gun the wrong direction. This sub only posts news articles on American politics. A majority of American politics these days focuses on everything trump does/doesn't do. The fact that they're negative toward trump is a reflection of the content available and of the work he's doing.", ">>{JohnHenryAaron} : It is insincere to the point of absurdity to say those messages were pushed by the Clinton campaign. The first did happen at a Clinton campaign event, but it was Madeleine Albright and it was something that was said off the cuff. It's something one person not formally part of the campaign said exactly once. And the second was from Gloria Steinem, who had no association with the Clinton campaign at all.", '>>{notachode} : You are clearly uninformed, which makes you part of the problem. As u/JohnHenryAaron pointed out, you are wrong in attributing those statements to Clinton.', ">>{notachode} : You're being downvoted, but you are 100% correct. Many people just can't be bothered to take this nuanced understanding of why Trump was able to succeed. It's much easier, and requires less critical thinking, to just paint with a broad brush and villainize all of his voters.", '>>{notachode} : This type of tribalism is part of the problem.', '>>{notachode} : Trump deserves all the bashing he is getting. The issue with this sub is the discourse on Trump voters. Most people aren\'t able to discuss the nuance of the problem and stop thinking at "bigot". Its just easier to engage in this "all good" or "all bad" type of thinking. The issue is that this demonization only further perpetuates the type of climate that allowed Trump supporters to develop in the first place. But again, that seems to be too nuanced for many of the posters here.', '>>{notachode} : Tina Fey is a great actor and writer. But whether you agree or disagree with her opinion - what makes it worth sharing? She is only one person, and nothing about her career grants her opinion any more weight than the majority of redditors in this thread. This applies to all celebrity political opinions.', '>>{Glorfindel212} : It\'s not about loyalty to a group. It\'s about the fabric of reality. Do you call mentally sane people "tribalists" for not listening to the guy who thinks he is Napoleon ? Of course not. This is not about a political divide that can exist between any party because some issue is actually hard to decide at some point (let\'s say, should we try to go to Mars right now ? as a good proposition of this kind). We are at a point where people are entrenching themselves in this cult. To some of them, there are NO possible case where Trump is ever wrong. They are creating a tribe and the rest is de facto, because they created a tribe (a structure of loyalty), excluded from it. There is no tribalism for truth, or logic, or the meaning of words. But there is a cult of one man that is on the same theological level as the Pope (by definition, he can\'t be wrong, and every move he does that appears to be bad is in fact a good move no one can see the effect of yet). This is the level of thinking that goes not surprisingly pretty well with religion (god does everything for you, and if it appears not to, it\'s because god\'s ways are hard do decipher). To those people, the only thing left to be done is to show them that the world opposes with the utmost vehemence their way of thinking. To make it appear what it is : insane. A man that thinks the earth is flat will not be moved by equations that are "sensible" arguments. He will move only by seing it with his very eyes. Those people are by definition not sensible to subtlety, you need something that is a logical shake up to wake them up. /rant', ">>{notachode} : And tell me what this approach will accomplish, other than granting yourself a sense of superiority? When, in the history of mankind, has a group of humans responded well to being told that they are wrong and that they need to be quiet? This isn't about who is right and who is wrong. It's about healing the divisions that have led to this type of extremism - not perpetuating them. It is very unfortunate that so many people have such a simple grasp of the problems we are currently facing.", '>>{Glorfindel212} : >And tell me what this approach will accomplish, other than granting yourself a sense of superiority? This is what you don\'t understand. I don\'t care about superiority. I\'m not a logical god that exists above others. Every one makes mistakes, the problem is that proposition is not shared by those that need it most. This approach will accomplish the shock it needs to provide : when you lay out the fact that in order to fix schools, we have to defund them, and say this to the supporters, they actually react. Something shocks them. It\'s in fact a shocking proposition. I\'ve discussed with a number of them : if you start by telling to them that you agree with them that fire actually makes things wet in order to prove them it burns, it will be this much harder to bring them back because obviously once you legitimated a point of view that is this far off from reality, it\'s only consolidated. They are actively wanting that we shift the norm. I\'ve seen people start argument on supporter sub by postulating that they agree on stuff that was obviously bonkers in order to try to reason : the problem is that now you shifted the problem to the details of the bonkers claim, and the bonkers claim is the new "basis of discussion". >When, in the history of mankind, has a group of humans responded well to being told that they are wrong and that they need to be quiet? This is a fallacy : everything that exists in history is not a repetition of what did happen. If that were the case, nothing would ever take place but the same event again and again. But yeah, as an anecdote, an interesting event is when nazi soldiers were shown images of the concentration camps. >This isn\'t about who is right and who is wrong. It\'s about healing the divisions that have led to this type of extremism - not perpetuating them. It is, sadly. And that\'s the problem. It used to be harder to tell, by far. You are falling for the classic "middle ground" fallacy : the truth has to be in the middle. Here is the problem : if opinions are placed on a segment and the far right is removed from reality, there is a good chance that the middle ground you seek is in fact in crazy territory. That means that accepting to "settle" is in fact accepting to conduct a crazy policy on the sole merit that it\'s slightly less crazy that the original policy. The problem is that several factors, among which politics being a sport, and ideological purity tests have made the healing impossible, as reasoning with someone that doesn\'t listen to rational argument is a pure waste of time. At this point, for some, only emotional shock might work. >It is very unfortunate that so many people have such a simple grasp of the problems we are currently facing. I\'m not sure what you are referencing here, but this not what it used to be. The scope of this is simply unpresidented (sic). This is why I think, just as Bin Laden already won, that Putin already won.', '>>{Berglekutt} : You realize by abstaining you gave tacit approval to whoever won the election right? How are you enjoying trumps policies you helped make possible?'], [">>{typical_trump_voter} : lol and everyone thought this ticket couldn't get any shittier.", '>>{deezmutts} : Somebody get Donald on the phone. Why, Trump? I mean, just when your poll numbers are equalizing to the HRC you go and do this. Are there really that many GOP votes to gain out there?', '>>{ElCaptainRon} : Pence and his wife, First Lady of Indiana Karen Pence,who was born man but after surgery became a woman. Article on Pence from wikipedia', '>>{cmorgasm} : As an Indiana resident let me just say, FUCK MIKE PENCE.', ">>{dyzo-blue} : Trump's campaign did say only White Men would be considered for the role. So for once they didn't flip-flop.", '>>{DebussySIMiami} : Pence is a great pick for a candidate who is great at hating Muslims and Mexicans, but needs a little help hating gays and women.', '>>{alephnul} : Not so popular with the ladies. Since he signed a particularly odious anti abortion bill last year the lady folk in his home state have been calling and emailing him to let him know how their periods are going because he seems to be so interested in them.', '>>{deezmutts} : Actually he was against Trumps suggestion to ban all muslims coming into the US.', ">>{Jzkqm} : As an Indiana resident, it's pretty bad. He's too right-wing for conservatives in this state, and Indiana is decently conservative. Look up RFRA and his anti-abortion bill from these past couple years.", '>>{JasonDavidWongPargin} : It\'s definitely the smartest of his short-list picks (Christie and Gingrich both poll horribly), I do think Trump is getting better advice these days. He went with the "boring" candidate which is what he needed, to reassure people he\'s not nuts.', ">>{Nameless_Archon} : Bad. Pence appears to have wanted to be a pastor and got elected governor instead. He signed the infamous [RFRA bill legalizing anti-gay discrimination](http://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/video/gov-mike-pence-religious-freedom-law-29987447) in Indiana that got nationwide scorn and cost the city money and business and prestige. He signed a [vastly overreaching anti-abortion bill that's already been overturned](https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/insulting-new-abortion-law-forces-women-to-pay-for-fetus-funerals) that forced women to pay for funerals after an abortion and forbid abortion in the event of fetal deformity (eg. forced to carry your destined-for-stillbirth child to term then disgorge it to die on the table instead of getting an abortion). Pence does not care about the rights of citizens, unless those citizens are white, straight, and male. Period. (And if you're just getting your period, ladies, [don't forget to tell Pence](http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/04/08/473518239/periods-as-protest-indiana-women-call-governor-to-talk-about-menstrual-cycles). He's very interested to hear from you.)", ">>{Nameless_Archon} : If you think picking Pence shows Trump isn't nuts, you don't know anything about Pence's record in Indiana. Pastor Pence is not well loved in the state, and with good reason.", ">>{Trump-Tzu} : As a Trump supporter here's why pence is a bad pick. * Pro TPP * Very against gays * Disagrees with trumps Muslim ban * In the early 2000's he publicly proclaimed that smoking doesn't kill people. * He doesn't belive in evolution Seriously this adds nothing to the ticket, Trump was already winning 3 out of 4 evangelicals.", '>>{PresidentChaos} : I wonder if Noot Gingrich is desperately calling up FoxNews, trying to get his job back.', ">>{OliveItMaggle} : And it's all downhill from here. Have fun.", '>>{PresidentChaos} : Champagne is being poured at Clinton Headquarters!!!']]

classify and reply

[">>{carman37} : Here's The Latest Big News On Russia And The U.S. Election", '>>{ryan924} : Even if Trump wanted to, The U.S will not go to war with China over Taiwan', ">>{Poweshow} : Taiwan doesn't fear becoming a pawn... Taiwan is the one that called Trump. Good god CNN...", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : The American people can't even trust Trump. Of course Taiwan can't.", '>>{Hillary__Bro} : What were you expecting? [A Bernie Sanders Socialist Feast](https://i.sli.mg/yzciaF.png)?', '>>{newmexicali} : The one thing that everyone should know by now, is you can never trust trump. Why would any country, with the exception of Russia now, trust doing deals with a trump administration.', '>>{MrIosity} : All 23 million of them? Must have been a long phone call.', ">>{Greenseattle} : And how do you know that he didn't force them to?", '>>{disturbd} : > "This article is contradicted by the Times’ reporting" But we are going to publish it as fact anyway. > "Editor’s note: Donald Trump regularly incites political violence and is a serial liar, rampant xenophobe, racist, misogynist and birther who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims — 1.6 billion members of an entire religion — from entering the U.S." Well that sure sounds unbiased.', ">>{BelieveEnemie} : If you're Taiwanese it's far better to have a US government standing up for you than one that will sell your sovereignty to keep NK from launching a nuclear test.", '>>{Fluidfox} : ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^0.5266 > [What is this?](https://pastebin.com/64GuVi2F/43573)', ">>{SnowSnowSnowSnow} : Russian hackers stole Clinton's emails, put them on Huma's laptop, and pinned it on Weiner?", ">>{Jokrtothethief} : It sure sounds exactly spot on. I mean, do you need to ignore reality to be 'unbiased' now?", ">>{newmexicali} : The T_D's madman god emperor orange Jesus, do you think he has demonstrated an understanding of global diplomacy and détente, nope, not even in office yet, and trying to start fires all over the pacific, and being a destabilizing force in our markets. IMO rather fucking scary so far.", '>>{clinton_fan} : Ohhh noooo, muh red scare!!!!! https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwH5uLCWYAEfeXl.jpg', '>>{Poweshow} : How do you suppose he could force Taiwan to call him?', ">>{NorthsideBurrito} : Why is today the big Russia dump day? Is it wrong to think it's a coordinated oppo dump of their Russia file? Nothing wrong with that, but so much dumpage at once!", '>>{Keerected_Recordz} : Politics aside, I appreciate this succinct, time honored expression of displeasure with a candidate.', '>>{MyOversoul} : Yep, nothing to see here folks... The Trump Organization shuttered the server once reporters began asking about it. Another server set up over the same pathway four days later was again closed after questions.', '>>{1461DaysInHell} : There is no way donnie the grifter would go back on a promise or rip off someone in a deal /s They are so boned, so incredibly screwed. The Taiwanese pissed off their very powerful neighbor who claims some controlling influence, with a promise from donnie that he would be there from them. They obliviously only know him from tv, where he plays a caricature of a responsible businessman.', ">>{nursewords} : Russia doesn't have to trust if they have the dirt", ">>{WOVigilant} : I've got a shiny dollar says the NSA has the contents of the messages.", '>>{Exuberant_Murica} : >The one thing that everyone should know by now, is you can never trust POLITICIANS. Why would any country, with the exception of Russia now, trust doing deals with a POLITICAL administration. **FTFY', ">>{Matues49} : But r/The_Donald told me Trump wasn't a politician.", ">>{dolphins3} : You know, I'm going to disagree. I think the vast majority of Taiwanese would rather the USA continue the polite diplomatic fiction that's been in place for decades than see North Korea gain usable nuclear weapons.", ">>{freevantage} : Do you think that it's that easy to call the president elect? The phone call was negotiated and set up in advance. Trump knowingly accepted the phone call with the potential conflicts in mind. Also, the Taiwanese president doesn't exactly have the greatest favorability right right due to dwindling tourism (at least from china), and housing and pension issues. She's actually trying to introduce similar economic policies as trump but it has not been received well. The Taiwanese people have not been kind to trump either and the media is constantly reiterating that they should be weary over the recent situation. More and more of them think of themselves as pawns.", '>>{TuLegit2quit} : Island fears becoming pawn between superpowers. When has Taiwan not been a pawn in US/China diplomacy?', ">>{MrIosity} : I'm just trying to clarify that there is no contradiction in the Taiwanese people being concerned by developing events, and the actions of their president. It should sound familiar, actually."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{carman37} : Here's The Latest Big News On Russia And The U.S. Election", '>>{Hillary__Bro} : What were you expecting? [A Bernie Sanders Socialist Feast](https://i.sli.mg/yzciaF.png)?', '>>{disturbd} : > "This article is contradicted by the Times’ reporting" But we are going to publish it as fact anyway. > "Editor’s note: Donald Trump regularly incites political violence and is a serial liar, rampant xenophobe, racist, misogynist and birther who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims — 1.6 billion members of an entire religion — from entering the U.S." Well that sure sounds unbiased.', '>>{Fluidfox} : ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^0.5266 > [What is this?](https://pastebin.com/64GuVi2F/43573)', ">>{SnowSnowSnowSnow} : Russian hackers stole Clinton's emails, put them on Huma's laptop, and pinned it on Weiner?", ">>{Jokrtothethief} : It sure sounds exactly spot on. I mean, do you need to ignore reality to be 'unbiased' now?", '>>{clinton_fan} : Ohhh noooo, muh red scare!!!!! https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwH5uLCWYAEfeXl.jpg', ">>{NorthsideBurrito} : Why is today the big Russia dump day? Is it wrong to think it's a coordinated oppo dump of their Russia file? Nothing wrong with that, but so much dumpage at once!", '>>{Keerected_Recordz} : Politics aside, I appreciate this succinct, time honored expression of displeasure with a candidate.', '>>{MyOversoul} : Yep, nothing to see here folks... The Trump Organization shuttered the server once reporters began asking about it. Another server set up over the same pathway four days later was again closed after questions.', ">>{WOVigilant} : I've got a shiny dollar says the NSA has the contents of the messages."], ['>>{ryan924} : Even if Trump wanted to, The U.S will not go to war with China over Taiwan', ">>{Poweshow} : Taiwan doesn't fear becoming a pawn... Taiwan is the one that called Trump. Good god CNN...", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : The American people can't even trust Trump. Of course Taiwan can't.", '>>{newmexicali} : The one thing that everyone should know by now, is you can never trust trump. Why would any country, with the exception of Russia now, trust doing deals with a trump administration.', '>>{MrIosity} : All 23 million of them? Must have been a long phone call.', ">>{Greenseattle} : And how do you know that he didn't force them to?", ">>{BelieveEnemie} : If you're Taiwanese it's far better to have a US government standing up for you than one that will sell your sovereignty to keep NK from launching a nuclear test.", ">>{newmexicali} : The T_D's madman god emperor orange Jesus, do you think he has demonstrated an understanding of global diplomacy and détente, nope, not even in office yet, and trying to start fires all over the pacific, and being a destabilizing force in our markets. IMO rather fucking scary so far.", '>>{Poweshow} : How do you suppose he could force Taiwan to call him?', '>>{1461DaysInHell} : There is no way donnie the grifter would go back on a promise or rip off someone in a deal /s They are so boned, so incredibly screwed. The Taiwanese pissed off their very powerful neighbor who claims some controlling influence, with a promise from donnie that he would be there from them. They obliviously only know him from tv, where he plays a caricature of a responsible businessman.', ">>{nursewords} : Russia doesn't have to trust if they have the dirt", '>>{Exuberant_Murica} : >The one thing that everyone should know by now, is you can never trust POLITICIANS. Why would any country, with the exception of Russia now, trust doing deals with a POLITICAL administration. **FTFY', ">>{Matues49} : But r/The_Donald told me Trump wasn't a politician.", ">>{dolphins3} : You know, I'm going to disagree. I think the vast majority of Taiwanese would rather the USA continue the polite diplomatic fiction that's been in place for decades than see North Korea gain usable nuclear weapons.", ">>{freevantage} : Do you think that it's that easy to call the president elect? The phone call was negotiated and set up in advance. Trump knowingly accepted the phone call with the potential conflicts in mind. Also, the Taiwanese president doesn't exactly have the greatest favorability right right due to dwindling tourism (at least from china), and housing and pension issues. She's actually trying to introduce similar economic policies as trump but it has not been received well. The Taiwanese people have not been kind to trump either and the media is constantly reiterating that they should be weary over the recent situation. More and more of them think of themselves as pawns.", '>>{TuLegit2quit} : Island fears becoming pawn between superpowers. When has Taiwan not been a pawn in US/China diplomacy?', ">>{MrIosity} : I'm just trying to clarify that there is no contradiction in the Taiwanese people being concerned by developing events, and the actions of their president. It should sound familiar, actually."]]

classify and reply

['>>{skribeiv} : To some extent this is probably true. It\'ll just continue without you because Bernie is on board with Hillary and OurRevolution is working with Democrats and, assuming you ever supported Bernie to begin with, you\'re over there with Donald "I wanna date your middle schooler" Trump.', '>>{lovely_sombrero} : Oil Company Openly States They Will Defy Army Corps Order in Standing Rock', ">>{Cenbe2} : Can't WAIT for Mexico to start arresting all those Yankees overstaying their visas.", '>>{ivsciguy} : Army Corps of Engineers could call the Army Corps of Combat for backup.', '>>{TheDevourerOfDreams} : Given all the evidence, it should be obvious to any clear thinking person that Team Trump colluded with the Russians. There are too many coincidences for it to be...well....a coincidence.', '>>{scarletsoda} : Well there goes the victory for standing rock. Now we have corporations openly declaring their intention to subvert rule of law.', '>>{TinyBaron} : Breitbart does fake news like [this.](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/07/german-police-quash-breitbart-story-of-mob-setting-fire-to-dortmund-church?CMP=share_btn_fb) Relevant video : http://youtu.be/hqQsnMipW4Q What chanting sounds like : https://youtu.be/5YHQkED__To', '>>{SmellGestapo} : Wasn\'t this website on the "official list" of websites that are fake news?', '>>{harglblarg} : From the horse\'s mouth: http://ir.energytransfer.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=106094&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2227348 "As stated all along, ETP and SXL are fully committed to ensuring that this vital project is brought to completion and fully expect to complete construction of the pipeline without any additional rerouting in and around\xa0Lake Oahe. Nothing this Administration has done today changes that in any way."', ">>{Flatineer} : Hopefully they're investigating fox, I having a feeling that might just be plan ol' psyops. EDIT, once they go fox they're always right no matter what....", '>>{BlakeRidley} : Old rich dudes date 20 year olds all the time', '>>{Hankey01} : I swear to god if all of this is proven to be false, I will shit on liberalism for years to come', ">>{ive_lost_my_keys} : I don't know but it sure loaded like shit on mobile with all those ads.", '>>{onetoughmotherfucker} : This one isn\'t "official" cause IDK who would make it official but it was compiled by a journalism professor: http://d279m997dpfwgl.cloudfront.net/wp/2016/11/Resource-False-Misleading-Clickbait-y-and-Satirical-%E2%80%9CNews%E2%80%9D-Sources-1.pdf Free Thought Project is listed as a (3) meaning > uses hyperbolic or clickbait-y headlines and/or social media descriptions, but may otherwise circulate reliable and/or verifiable information.', '>>{Percival_Snugglebutt} : Translation: "We\'ll wait until our one investor is in the White House before pushing this."', ">>{skribeiv} : That's what you're going with? OK. Do you think most old rich dudes make those decisions when they're ten?", '>>{WatchingDonFail} : Not only will the revolution continue, but it’s going to spread throughout the country, grow, and gain strength by bringing the populist issues, grassroots methods, and small-dollar funding of Sanders’ presidential run to local and state politics. The revolution will continue. Just at a slightly slower rate. HRC will continue green and equality ideas. Perhaps not as fast as Sanders. But we can pick up the pace when we can get the votes!', ">>{AnotherPersonPerhaps} : This doesn't have a goddamn thing to do with liberalism. Shit, we are trying to make Pence the President right now. He, presumably, will be much more effective at passing right wing policy than Trump will be or has been so far. This isn't about politics. It's about treason. There are prominent conservatives that want him gone too.", '>>{RoastedWithHoney} : Colluded to do what? Did they commit a crime? Given the reach of Russia information campaign should we investigate everyone with ties to Russia? Former Bush AG Mukasey discussing the Russian narrative on CNN, the whole interview is really good. He makes the case that even if there was an email of Trump asking Russia to find dirt on Hillary he still would not have committed a crime. https://youtu.be/Pjo16QamjIc', '>>{Carp328} : What? The other Shitefart article says that the ICE raids are fake news.', '>>{1TipsyCoachman} : The victim of treason is always America and American citizens.', ">>{eeyore102} : Bet they don't get rubber bullets, stun grenades, and tear gas, though.", '>>{dieyoung} : Then maybe what he stood for, and not actually Bernie the sell out Sanders himself.', '>>{CarbonatedConfidence} : [Oh look! More propaganda!](http://i.imgur.com/1vnmOpb.gif)', '>>{ChuckFromPhilly} : Not about politics. State sponsored propaganda. Redditor for ten days with posts on t_d describing how he was to do this to antagonize.', '>>{SmellGestapo} : Some professor made a list. Looks like this site is in category 3: > CATEGORY 3: Other websites on this list sometimes use hyperbolic or clickbait-y headlines and/or social media descriptions, but may otherwise circulate reliable and/or verifiable information. These websites are marked with a 3. So I guess this site is "just okay"? http://d279m997dpfwgl.cloudfront.net/wp/2016/11/Resource-False-Misleading-Clickbait-y-and-Satirical-%E2%80%9CNews%E2%80%9D-Sources-1.pdf', ">>{Creddit999} : And how many are actually criminals? Oh yeah, facts don't matter on Breitbart.", '>>{silentbob_} : If Breitbart is an unacceptable source why is it allowed on this sub?', '>>{lovely_sombrero} : I hope NY Times is in Category 1 for their 2003 Iraq lies?', '>>{AngryPoli} : I hate to wuote this but: "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -John F. Kennedy The state of the union is getting to a point of which the average American will not ignore anymore. The future is a big question at this point. Hillary is gone by next week (don\'t quote me on that) and Trump will not be allowed to be president. This could go any way.', '>>{RoastedWithHoney} : So how did Trump victimize America and American citizens?', '>>{skribeiv} : Show me here on the doll where Bernie touched you when he endorsed Clinton.', ">>{1TipsyCoachman} : If you are talking specifically treason, we are in the first stages of getting all the info through the Senate investigation. So far, we know his constant retweeting of Russian propaganda and lies was definitely engineered. Grab some popcorn, it's a great show. Once all the facts are in from the investigation then we can make a complete list. If you are talking about how Trump hurts America and Americans generally, that list is extremely long. It can be summarized by stating that every action he takes is either unconstitutional, hurts those citizens least in a position to mitigate the damage, furthers propaganda and lies, destroys America's natural resources, undermines the ability of our government to serve the people, tarnishes and damages our reputation overseas, alienates our allies, increases terrorism recruitment, and breaks promises we have made that stabilize the world order.", ">>{CornCobbDouglas} : Aren't they not allowed to operate on US soil? That's for national guard.", ">>{dieyoung} : It's weird doc....I know it was...unnatural...but I kinda *liked* it!", '>>{RoastedWithHoney} : I am sure Trumps tweets were planned, it was a big part of his campaign. I am not sure you can prove he was retweeting Russian propaganda and how that would be treason if you could. As for not liking his policies as being a reason to accuse him of treason, that is quite the stretch. Just not liking someone is not a solid foundation for accusations of treason.', '>>{skribeiv} : Good! Glad to have you on board the Clinton train now, buddy. Check your coat and that stupid hat at the door and go join Bernie over at the reformed Sanders dead-enders counter.', '>>{1TipsyCoachman} : Did you watch the hearing yesterday? The tweeting thing is already established.', ">>{eeyore102} : yeah, people who don't get brought up on charges when they do something wrong, people who are free to evade whatever taxes they like, and people who ~~bribe~~ ~~pay~~ lobby to get whatever laws passed that most benefit them.", '>>{Phluffhead024} : >“The White House’s directive today to the Corps for further delay is just the latest in a series of overt and transparent political actions by an administration which has abandoned the rule of law in favor of currying favor with a **narrow and extreme political constituency.** Ya, those savages and their clean water.', ">>{RoastedWithHoney} : I did not, I know it's a long shot but do you have a clip?", '>>{BombaFett} : Trump actually sold his stake. [source](http://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/05/trump-sells-his-stake-in-dakota-access-pipeline-developer.html)', '>>{KEK555} : CNN does fake news like [this](http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kristine-marsh/2016/08/15/cnn-selectively-edits-police-shooting-victims-sisters-words) Or [this](http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/11/21/cancel-the-debate-cnn-caught-selectively-editing-trumps-muslim-comments/) Or [this](https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/25142-selective-editing-cnn-changes-trump-s-message-about-russian-hacking) Or [this](http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/16/cnn-host-claims-its-illegal-for-public-to-view-wikileaks-emails-video/) Or [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2KT17KBTWE) Or [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzY_h6OpnoQ) Or even [this](http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-10/leaked-footage-exposes-cnn-producing-fake-news-during-first-gulf-war)', ">>{DivinePotatoe} : Good bet considering he had money invested in the pipeline's construction.", '>>{padrepio23} : Believe it when I see it. Would love to see it.', '>>{eshemuta} : I got to the first ad and noped on out of there. Not gonna read it.', '>>{1TipsyCoachman} : There is a monster megathread with links to the full hearing.', '>>{jacquedsouza} : You know, instead of the narrow and extreme political constituency that is the oil lobby. Would love to see the police tactics on those guys.', '>>{RoastedWithHoney} : I will listen to the hearing today at work, I was hoping to have a quick reference for the tweeting part. Thanks.', ">>{Themostunderdisturb} : Mexico has no problem sending illegal aliens back to their country, they apparently don't have a regressive party but instead have common sense.", '>>{eats_shoots_and_pees} : If you can vote for Trump, you never knew what Bernie stood for.', ">>{Eric_the_Barbarian} : I'd be happy to just see them turn the water cannons and concussion grenades on the work crews. But we know who the fuzz works for.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : See ICE does it's job. No need to be xenophobic.", '>>{argsblarg} : Citing from shit sources? You think you are making a point by citing from shit sources? Really? You probably think you are clever for citing from such garbage. Youtube is NOT a valid source!', '>>{fat_osvaldo} : EPA: We need to wait for the Environmental Impact Assessment Energy Transfer Partners: New phone who dis?', ">>{fat_osvaldo} : I wonder what's a larger group of people: The oil lobby or the population of this area", ">>{2pumpTrump} : I'm starting to notice that Breitbart posters use the American flag flair rather than state flair. Why is this?", '>>{Schiffy94} : And you do shit like [this](http://puu.sh/u0het.png). Get out of here.', ">>{GarbagePailAdult} : /u/AngryPoli obviously has his ear to the ground. I'm assuming Alex Jones' fish babies will leap from the water and mob her.", ">>{KEK555} : Good evidence is still good evidence regardless of its origin. Sources aside, what exactly do you find wrong with the evidence other than the sources? I'll give you a bit to answer that. Have you read and analyzed the articles? Have you reviewed the evidence? Have you reviewed the claims? Probably not. Come back to me when you have.", '>>{2pumpTrump} : I thought it was because conservatives are embarrassed about the state they live in.', ">>{neuromorph} : So, where are the local militias? this is literal 'go time'!!!!", ">>{2pumpTrump} : Because my speculation isn't a definitive answer. I can see how you think though. Also, where did you get the idea that liberals find the flag offensive? I have one hanging on the wall in my home. And what state harbors you, fellow American?", ">>{Creddit999} : Yeah. I understand that. But how best to deal with people like that woman who's been here for 20 years and is a functioning citizen with a family of legal US citizens? Round her up and deport her on no notice? Is Mexico her country at this point? Gestapo tactics aren't the answer in all cases. It's depressing and complicated.", '>>{stagefuknfour} : Bernie plays the long game. He understands that one can lose battles but still win the war. Supporting Hillary is a damage control move. Better by far her than the buffoon. Yeah, lost the battle but the struggle continues and it continues against the opponent of his choice. Bernie plays a long game.', ">>{ArcherGladIDidntSay} : You have a way with words. Mostly condescending, but that's how people gain respect and confidence in their ideas, yes?", '>>{TheKasp} : Actually, the evidence sucks if the source is not trustworthy. It is a basic concept when regarding sources in a serious manner and not just to attempt getting fake internet points.', '>>{DreadTrumpVI} : Too bad theyd have to remove to violent terrorists camped out there because the corp of engineers is closing the land they are on. So if they complain about the pipeline, which is 100 percent legal, avoiding the corp then it makes them hypocrites.', ">>{JackOfTrades11} : It's so frustrating trying to scroll through the story with ads popping up and bringing you back to the top of the page.", '>>{Roundhouse1988} : First of all, these are non violent protestors expressing their constitutional rights, the main camp lies on reservation tribal land, and some of the resistance camps lie on army corp of engineers land which is Treaty land. This pipeline was passed through a corrupt institutional framework that needs to be fought against; this pipeline is just as legal as the trail of tears, wounded knee, and many of the countless injustices against Native people.', '>>{Buttocks} : > Also, where did you get the idea that liberals find the flag offensive? [Not safe to display American flag in American high school](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/02/27/not-safe-to-display-american-flag-in-american-high-school/?utm_term=.44dfc8b5edc8)', ">>{skribeiv} : No, it's how people troll /r/politics and Trump supporters. Are you going to follow me around from thread to thread now?", '>>{HillaryBrokeTheLaw} : All the news fit to print was already taken', '>>{magusg} : If people can die, then corporations need to have that option as well.', ">>{Caracaos} : Leave Energy Transfers LLP alone! He's a good boy, he didn't do nothin'!", ">>{Themostunderdisturb} : You mean the lady who stole a legal immigrant's social security number and got caught, had a trial, had a appeal and was told she would be deported and then got deported? That lady? The one who committed a felony and was told she would be deported?", ">>{ArcherGladIDidntSay} : Trolling isn't allowed on the politics subreddit. Neither is incivility towards other users based on there political preferences. You've violated both those rules. How am I following you around when you post incessantly all day in basically every thread? How could I not come across your comments? Sorry there is a dissenting opinion, I know it's scarce these days.", '>>{skribeiv} : Trolling has more than one definition, and this is not the one prohibited by the rules of this subreddit. I am very genuine, and I am engaging...but highly sarcastic, and purposely engaging with the people that I think promote absurd and poorly developed positions. I\'m not being uncivil right now at all. No name calling, no derogatory comments. Just a lot of sarcasm. Incivility doesn\'t mean "thinks you\'re wrong" or "disagrees with you smugly." >How am I following you around when you post incessantly all day in basically every thread? The overwhelming majority of your interactions in the last 15 minutes or so have been with my comments in multiple threads, many of them the ACTUALLY banned sort of trolling themselves. Don\'t worry, though. I don\'t give a shit. But you\'re definitely sorta just stalking me around reddit. It\'s weird. >Sorry there is a dissenting opinion, I know it\'s scarce these days. I\'m not actually sure anything you\'ve said to me constitutes a dissenting opinion, buddy. Just odd questions and tangential statements.', '>>{VROF} : I know someone who was brought here illegally as a child, they were caught and sent home and she was brought back. She has built a life here, is married to an American and has a baby. She can only work under the table; she is the best house cleaner I have ever seen. Ever. She should be able to work for a real company, pay taxes and not live in fear. Instead she is working for cash cleaning homes. They have spent thousands of dollars on attorneys trying to get her citizenship but because she was deported once she is being told it will never happen. That is idiotic.', '>>{BeowulfShaeffer} : So what role will he play in her Administration? Suppose Dems take the Senate - does he get something like Majority leader? Or at least chair a powerful committee?', ">>{ArcherGladIDidntSay} : Haha you didn't even acknowledge that you're all over the politics subreddit. It's not as if I'm following you around to obscure subreddits. As soon as I open a new thread it's a good chance you'll be contributing your subjective opinion. Sorry to creep you out, but it seems like you're the one with an obsession.", ">>{Colinm478} : Not really. If your first act in the United States is a crime, you shouldn't be here.", '>>{skribeiv} : No, you\'re just specifically targeting my comments. I don\'t need to acknowledge your pointless statement that I\'m "all over" the politics subreddit. You weren\'t (aren\'t?) really engaging with other people in those threads. I looked. People do sometimes read new. I\'ve had to stop, sadly, since I\'m spending an inordinate amount of time responding exclusively to you. See above.', '>>{5pointlight} : yeah thanks alot court reporter for Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. 1886.', ">>{KEK555} : You read the headlines, not the articles. If you'd have read the articles as well, then you wouldn't be making this comment.", ">>{Creddit999} : If that's the story, then fine. I had not read the details in that case. It's not clear what the actual criteria are these days. Too much happening.", ">>{ArcherGladIDidntSay} : So now you're admitting to creeping me? See you around the threads I suppose. Should I not engage with you?", '>>{Themostunderdisturb} : There should only be one criteria, are you legally allowed to be in the US? If no then you get deported. Same as it should be in any country in the world.', ">>{2pumpTrump} : Oh yeah, when the courts have to teach conservative children how to use tact and civility because no one teaches them at home. [Here's a proud conservative who loved the flag](http://static5.businessinsider.com/image/55316148eab8ea59068b456a-480/timothy-mcveigh.jpg). Not all conservatives, but 'your type' love to jam your opinions, white-bread culture, and politics into everyone's face like it's the word of a god, but also love to cry and curl up in a ball when someone stands up to you. Now, I'm sorry, I missed where you said you were from?", ">>{skribeiv} : I have yet to do anything other than respond to your posts that show up in my inbox...and there are many. But I did check to see if you were just responding en masse to a lot of people, or just going from thread to thread to respond to me. Though, I guess you probably just went down my post history--unless you're legitimately creepy. I don't really care if you engage with me. Though I'd prefer you keep it to a single thread. You're annoying, if nothing else.", ">>{RayWencube} : No, it isn't. It's a civil violation.", ">>{ArcherGladIDidntSay} : Sorry to disappoint. I'd say the same about your incessant posting.", ">>{skribeiv} : You're welcome to stop replying... I obviously have the right to post as much as I'd like. Do you think you have some claim over my agency there?", ">>{RayWencube} : It isn't a crime; it's a civil violation.", ">>{ArcherGladIDidntSay} : Am I not also allowed to post as much as I'd like? I wouldn't be interacting with you if you weren't in like every politics thread. The loudest people get the most responses.", ">>{lovely_sombrero} : Shouldn't we be a country of law and order?", '>>{Buttarang} : No. When the protesters actually break the law, it\'s all love and support to them for standing up to the "evil" corporations and the corrupt government. This is despite the fact that the pipeline is trying to prevent the number and magnitude of oil spills (compared to rail transport) by following an existing pipeline under the Missouri that never crosses any tribal land, *whatsoever*. When my side just threatens to break the law I ought to be allowed the same luxury.', ">>{skribeiv} : Of course you are, though following a single user around from thread to thread...and then complaining about how much they post...while simultaneously responding to them over and over again is a bit on the odd side. Again, I'm just responding to you. YOU keep replying to additional threads.", ">>{lovely_sombrero} : >When the protesters actually break the law What law? It is their land or in some places federal land and they have their 1st Amendment right... What law are they breaking? >When my side just threatens to break the law I ought to be allowed the same luxury. I get the argument. I don't have to obey the law, because I think someone else does not as well. Here is the map of tribal lands as per 1853 Fort Laramie Treaty http://www.workers.org/wp-content/uploads/StandingRockMap.jpg", ">>{ArcherGladIDidntSay} : I haven't followed you anywhere though..I think you're paranoid.", ">>{Buttocks} : > Not all conservatives, but 'your type' love to jam your opinions, white-bread culture, and politics into everyone's face like it's the word of a god, but also love to cry and curl up in a ball when someone stands up to you. You don't even know me.", ">>{KEK555} : Breitbart doesn't violate any of the rules, but is majorly disliked on this sub since the majority of r/politics is extremely left-leaning.", '>>{brad3378} : Sanders supporters still seem quite polite considering what the Podesto emails said about them.', ">>{Colinm478} : Wrong, it's a misdemeanor and repeated attempts are felonies.", '>>{KrasnyRed5} : It was going to be a short lived victory anyway. The parent company is just going to wait for Trump to come into office and restart the project.', '>>{cymric} : It is complicated. The POTUS can either declare a state of emergency or suspend the writ of habeas corpus to do it.', '>>{argsblarg} : It\'s not "good" evidence. Get a skeptical brain in your head. Learn to check facts. That\'s the problem in our country - people insisting on believing things that sound good. And before you even THINK of accusing me of doing the same, I\'m way ahead of you. No, I learn everything I can about an issue that I can - unlike most people.', '>>{RayWencube} : That\'s improper entry--meaning coming here without ever having legal authorization to do so. Nearly half of "illegal" immigrants are here as a result of over-staying visas. Someone being here undocumented is *not* in and of itself a crime; they have to have also come here originally without legal authorization.', ">>{Rudyrobbob} : Just think of how much Other People's Money you can spend when you're a corporation.", '>>{roterghost} : I can break the law if somebody else does first? Am I hearing you right?', ">>{mawnicker} : [That](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor)'s bigoted. [Corporations](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leviathan) *are* [people](https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/ba/96/c0/ba96c01d0b28d1f9dbce6a6091697a59.jpg).", '>>{RomanNumeralVI} : Defy an order? There is no "order". They just have to revise a report and then reapply. Then all is good.', ">>{Folsomdsf} : Army: No Oil Company : We'll do it anyhow Population: Get the popcorn", ">>{2pumpTrump} : heh, I don't even know what state you live in...lol", ">>{ray1290} : It's pretty stupid to claim that NYT lied to help bolster a **Republican** president's war. You don't seem to be aware that journalists are not omniscient, or you don't realize that NYT is liberal.", '>>{Colinm478} : Would you like to continue shifting the goal posts?', '>>{LugganathFTW} : Native Americans? A narrow and extreme political constituency. But fuck immigrants am I right?!', ">>{KEK555} : Okay, so if you're willing to say that this evidence isn't good evidence, then you **must** have a good reason to say so, right? Because 'I DONT LIKE THE SOURCE!' **isn't an argument**.", '>>{savagedan} : I hope the Police go in and beat the living fuck out of these folks', '>>{deadletter} : How does suspending the writ of habeas corpus allow this action?', ">>{argsblarg} : I don't like the source the IS a good reason!!! Because they have PROVEN to be lying sackks of shit - like YOUR sources. So, instead of arguing with me, how about you spend some time learning about skepticism and critical thought, M-Kay?! And then we'd have a better society, M-Kay?! And you are now BORING me with stupid rhetoric and questions!", ">>{FlyDungas} : I think it's more that Breitbart is run by really bad people, nobody I know, liberal or conservative, would be caught reading it", ">>{TrickOrTreater} : Nothing will change until these corporate fucker's heads start rolling out of baskets.", '>>{bigwalleye} : What a horseshit map. "majority white community" lol all of nd is a majority white community. Google standing rock rez map. It does not go through Indian lands. Sure 200 years ago it may have but not today! We have freedom of speech, but let\'s be honest, it\'s not really free. If I went to a classroom at an elementary school and started burping the alphabet to protest education I\'d get kicked out pretty fast.', '>>{CornCobbDouglas} : That sounds right because Bush was lawfully able to allow the army to help in Katrina in NOLA along with the national guard.', '>>{AlbinoWitchHunter} : Maybe you missed the memo but it is no longer 100% legal', ">>{KEK555} : You may think that, but considering that the #2 post in the 'Hot' section is from CNN... the rest don't really share that opinion.", ">>{KEK555} : Ignorance is Bliss is a quote that really represents you here. '*I'll call everything I disagree with 'garbage', therefore, I no longer have to learn anything that opposes my current opinions.*'", '>>{Buttocks} : Then why are they always setting it on fire?', '>>{mtthwas} : Well we just elected a corporation President... President The Trump Organization.', ">>{derangedly} : Corporations are people, therefore they can be criminals. Lock 'em up.", '>>{savagedan} : Thats what happened to the protesters, so fair seems fair', '>>{KEK555} : Alright then, how have my sources been "PROVEN to be lying sackks of shit" ? > So, instead of arguing with me, how about you spend some time learning about skepticism and critical thought, M-Kay?! I do. It\'s why I haven\'t been a liberal for about nine months now; and it\'s why I review my evidences, and check my sources. > And you are now BORING me with stupid rhetoric and questions! You mean questions that you can\'t answer?', ">>{fight_me_for_it} : When NPR interviewed and reported about this the company spokesperson said it would go through. I'm not surprised. What bothers me is call for privitization of tribal lands. Ridiculous. .", '>>{lamabaronvonawesome} : Watch it happen. I love the name calling though!', ">>{factsRcool} : If it's a *white* corporation I expect peaceful resolution with little to no violence", '>>{factsRcool} : Cops tip their hats and say "hi Mr Koch"', '>>{Schiffy94} : Calling everything anti-Trump "fake news" doesn\'t work anymore. Gorka already ruined that narrative by outright admitting that they were going to say it about anything that opposed his administration.', '>>{treerat} : >since the majority of r/politics is extremely ~~left~~ fact-leaning. fixed it', '>>{factsRcool} : Sadly nearly the whole MSM was lying along with the Republican administration back then', '>>{KEK555} : This is the same subreddit that called the executive order "EXECUTIVE ORDER: PROTECTING THE NATION FROM FOREIGN TERRORIST ENTRY INTO THE UNITED STATES" a \'**Muslim ban**\', when it\'s really not? Yeah, I\'m gonna go and say that you didn\'t fix it.', ">>{Muvseevum} : Because they don't know about state flags in their country.", '>>{HollowUkuleleChords} : We are ruled by an oligarchy. This is just the beginning. We need to take a stand against them, in everything they do.', ">>{Cfpod} : He's not an investor. You are aware of that, right?", ">>{Buttarang} : No, you're not hearing me correctly. If the protesters break the law you can still support them, and support the law too if you accept the legal repercussions of their activity. I'm supporting the oil company in the same way.", '>>{Muvseevum} : Criterion is the singular in our language.', '>>{preserved_fish} : The president and his spokesman called it a muslim ban. Were they lying?', ">>{KEK555} : When did the president and his spokesman call it a muslim ban? Edit: Sorry, downvotes aren't the same thing as evidence.", ">>{RayWencube} : I didn't shift the goal posts. Being here without authorization is not a crime. Unless and until ICE states that these are aliens who committed improper entry, the *only* thing we know is that they are in violation of a civil law. Therefore, not criminals. Moreover, even if they are suspected of coming here illegally, they are only *suspected* of committing a crime. Meaning they still wouldn't be criminals--in the eyes of the law, at least--unless and until they are convicted.", ">>{Colinm478} : Yes, you did. I clearly said 'illegally entering the US is a crime' to which you responded 'No, it isn't. It's a civil violation'. Do you have a reading disability or something?", ">>{KevinsFamousChilli} : I've been a liberal my whole life. Do you know how many times I've put a flag on fire? Answer: zero. Besides the fact that you are making stuff up, what's wrong with freedom of speech. You're demigod Milo seems to think the left is trying to stop freedom of speech, but from your comment it seems like you may be opposed to it. It must suck to be a hoodwinked and confused conservative.", ">>{RayWencube} : You're right. I was assuming you were conflating them being here with them coming in because that is a very common conflation. I apologize. But that doesn't justify the personal attack.", ">>{2pumpTrump} : I'm proud to be American too! I'm also proud to be from California! How 'bout you are you proud of where you live?", '>>{Buttarang} : You do *not* get the argument. I can *support* someone that breaks the law AND support the law if I accept the consequences of their actions, *especially* if you first support the other side in exactly the same way. They\'ve blocked public roads. They\'ve refused to leave federal land. They\'ve created pyres of old tires to separate themselves from police and the national guard. Clearly more legal activity has redefined the borders of the land *legally* belonging to the tribes. Whether or not that activity was moral, and whether the tribes have a moral claim to the land beyond the reservation (which, for the record, I believe wasn\'t and that they do) is not relevant to a legal discussion. Source for the "archaeological sites," please.', '>>{KEK555} : Nowhere near as much as George Soros paid you.', ">>{prey4mojo} : I notice you don't have the American flag displayed... are you one of these flag hating liberals you speak of? :-/", '>>{KEK555} : **I\'ve read it. Regardless of President Trump wanting a Muslim ban, the executive order he passed isn\'t a Muslim ban** ------------------------- I\'m gonna go ahead and copy-paste an argument from a week ago. ----------------- One thing people need to be made aware of is that: **The executive order has nothing to do with Muslims whatsoever.** Seriously, it doesn\'t. If you want, here is the full script of the executive order. [**EXECUTIVE ORDER: PROTECTING THE NATION FROM FOREIGN TERRORIST ENTRY INTO THE UNITED STATES**](https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/27/executive-order-protecting-nation-foreign-terrorist-entry-united-states) * The executive order addressed only 7 out of 50 Muslim-majority countries. * None of the 7 countries weren\'t even in the top 5 largest Muslim-majority countries. * It doesn\'t target already-vetted refugees in the USA who\'ve been here for a while. * It doesn\'t target American-born Muslims. * It doesn\'t even say "Muslim(s)" or "Islam" even once ----------------------- A Muslim ban would be extremely reasonable in my opinion. Islam supports terrorism and violence, in every country Muslims spread to, Sharia and violence spread as well. Even if most Muslims aren\'t terrorists, a huge amount of them support terrorism, engage in misogynistic practices, support pedophilia (even their prophet is a pedo), practice honor killings, advocate sharia law, pour acid on their wives and beat them, engage in rape of women who aren\'t covered head-to-toe, etc. Europe has suffered due to the massive amounts of muslim \'refugees\'. Especially Sweden, it has become the rape capital of the world ever since it has let in such a massive amount of refugees. At least Japan did what was wise and shut its borders to refugees ever since they let 27 in, and 2 have gang-raped and robbed a woman. ------------------------------------------------ Another from not too long ago. ------------------------- Even then, former president Barack Obama imposed immigration restrictions 19 times. Four times on Muslim-majority countries. http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/obama-3-575x75.jpg http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/obama-2-575x562.jpg http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/obama-1-575x539.jpg', '>>{lovely_sombrero} : >They\'ve blocked public roads. Like every protest ever? >They\'ve refused to leave federal land. Like every protest ever? >They\'ve created pyres of old tires to separate themselves from police and the national guard. Aaaand? By the way - what is the national guard doing there? >Clearly more legal activity has redefined the borders of the land legally belonging to the tribes. The treaty still stands. If the government chose to unilaterally break the treaty, that just means the government is breaking its own laws. If you call that "more legal activity" - fine. >Whether or not that activity was moral I am not talking about morality. I am talking about treaties and the law. >Source for the "archaeological sites," please. Don\'t care about archaeology. I care about the treaty.', '>>{lamabaronvonawesome} : Oh, I am talking about Trump approving the pipeline. :)', ">>{Buttarang} : Other protests breaking the law doesn't mean this protest didn't also break the law. National Guard is there, along with ND state troopers, to aid in enforcing that law. The [Treaty of Fort Laramie **(1868)**](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Fort_Laramie_(1868) still stands. This superseded the [Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Fort_Laramie_(1851).", ">>{lovely_sombrero} : That is not what the National Guard is for. >National Guard units can be mobilized for federal active duty to supplement regular armed forces during times of war or national emergency declared by Congress,[20] the President[20] or the Secretary of Defense.[21] They can also be activated for service in their respective states upon declaration of a state of emergency by the governor of the state or territory in which they serve, or in the case of Washington, D.C., by the Commanding General. Unlike U.S. Army Reserve members, National Guard members cannot be mobilized individually, except through voluntary transfers and Temporary Duty Assignments (TDY). >Other protests breaking the law doesn't mean this protest didn't also break the law How are they breaking the law? >The Treaty of Fort Laramie (1868) still stands. This superseded the Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851). 1868 treaty just gives them more land. It does in no way change the 1851 treaty, unless you can cite the relevant part of it that does?", '>>{prey4mojo} : You have really only been on reddit for 11 days? Or is this a dummy/troll throw away account? If not, how do you feel about white christian conservative terrorists like the one who recently murdered 6 in Canada? And how should we best go about keeping them out of our country?', ">>{KEK555} : > You have really only been on reddit for 11 days? Or is this a dummy/troll throw away account? My previous Reddit account was compromised by hackers. > If not, how do you feel about white christian conservative terrorists like the one who recently murdered 6 in Canada? Christian terrorism certainly sometimes happens. Most of the time it isn't in the name of Christianity, but, it isn't a threat; although the attack in Canada was an unfortunate event and should not have happened. > And how should we best go about keeping them out of our country? Terrorism in the name of Christianity is rare, and isn't big enough to be an issue. Muslim terrorism, however, is.", '>>{prey4mojo} : Sorry to hear about your account. But certainly murder in general is a bigger issue than terrorism. I read somewhere that it is 1/3 of one percent of deaths. It seems irrational to ban travel for large swaths of people for the sake of such a small threat. Do you think the threat of islamic terrorism on US soil has been exaggerated for political reasons?', '>>{Cfpod} : Read back through these comments and try again. They said "an investor into the White House". Trump is not one.', '>>{lamabaronvonawesome} : Sure, but the gist is he will OK the pipeline. :)', ">>{KEK555} : > But certainly murder in general is a bigger issue than terrorism Yes, it is; but unlike radical Islamic terrorism, general 'murder' doesn't have a specific root. > I read somewhere that it is 1/3 of one percent of deaths. It seems irrational to ban travel for large swaths of people for the sake of such a small threat. Do you think the threat of islamic terrorism on US soil has been exaggerated for political reasons? See, all of this talk about how there haven't been many crimes from people from those countries, how unlikely it is to be attacked by refugees on U.S. soil, etc. are misleading. That's because we haven't taken in so many refugees! Proportional to the size and population of other countries, we haven't taken in so many. Even then, our vetting process is tougher than many other countries (Even though it could definitely use some fixing and reviewing). If you want to see what the effects of refugees are, look at the refugee crisis all across Europe. Even though a tough vetting system makes it less likely that refugees like the ones in Europe will get through, I still think that we shouldn't let refugees in whatsoever! It's not that I don't want to help **actual** refugees, it's just that we don't need the risk. Even with peaceful refugees, it's not necessary. It costs way less to relocate 'refugees' within their own country, and refugees should be helped in their country, not by being brought to another country. It just doesn't work."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{skribeiv} : To some extent this is probably true. It\'ll just continue without you because Bernie is on board with Hillary and OurRevolution is working with Democrats and, assuming you ever supported Bernie to begin with, you\'re over there with Donald "I wanna date your middle schooler" Trump.', '>>{BlakeRidley} : Old rich dudes date 20 year olds all the time', ">>{skribeiv} : That's what you're going with? OK. Do you think most old rich dudes make those decisions when they're ten?", '>>{WatchingDonFail} : Not only will the revolution continue, but it’s going to spread throughout the country, grow, and gain strength by bringing the populist issues, grassroots methods, and small-dollar funding of Sanders’ presidential run to local and state politics. The revolution will continue. Just at a slightly slower rate. HRC will continue green and equality ideas. Perhaps not as fast as Sanders. But we can pick up the pace when we can get the votes!', '>>{dieyoung} : Then maybe what he stood for, and not actually Bernie the sell out Sanders himself.', '>>{AngryPoli} : I hate to wuote this but: "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -John F. Kennedy The state of the union is getting to a point of which the average American will not ignore anymore. The future is a big question at this point. Hillary is gone by next week (don\'t quote me on that) and Trump will not be allowed to be president. This could go any way.', '>>{skribeiv} : Show me here on the doll where Bernie touched you when he endorsed Clinton.', ">>{dieyoung} : It's weird doc....I know it was...unnatural...but I kinda *liked* it!", '>>{skribeiv} : Good! Glad to have you on board the Clinton train now, buddy. Check your coat and that stupid hat at the door and go join Bernie over at the reformed Sanders dead-enders counter.', '>>{padrepio23} : Believe it when I see it. Would love to see it.', '>>{eats_shoots_and_pees} : If you can vote for Trump, you never knew what Bernie stood for.', ">>{GarbagePailAdult} : /u/AngryPoli obviously has his ear to the ground. I'm assuming Alex Jones' fish babies will leap from the water and mob her.", '>>{stagefuknfour} : Bernie plays the long game. He understands that one can lose battles but still win the war. Supporting Hillary is a damage control move. Better by far her than the buffoon. Yeah, lost the battle but the struggle continues and it continues against the opponent of his choice. Bernie plays a long game.', ">>{ArcherGladIDidntSay} : You have a way with words. Mostly condescending, but that's how people gain respect and confidence in their ideas, yes?", ">>{skribeiv} : No, it's how people troll /r/politics and Trump supporters. Are you going to follow me around from thread to thread now?", ">>{ArcherGladIDidntSay} : Trolling isn't allowed on the politics subreddit. Neither is incivility towards other users based on there political preferences. You've violated both those rules. How am I following you around when you post incessantly all day in basically every thread? How could I not come across your comments? Sorry there is a dissenting opinion, I know it's scarce these days.", '>>{skribeiv} : Trolling has more than one definition, and this is not the one prohibited by the rules of this subreddit. I am very genuine, and I am engaging...but highly sarcastic, and purposely engaging with the people that I think promote absurd and poorly developed positions. I\'m not being uncivil right now at all. No name calling, no derogatory comments. Just a lot of sarcasm. Incivility doesn\'t mean "thinks you\'re wrong" or "disagrees with you smugly." >How am I following you around when you post incessantly all day in basically every thread? The overwhelming majority of your interactions in the last 15 minutes or so have been with my comments in multiple threads, many of them the ACTUALLY banned sort of trolling themselves. Don\'t worry, though. I don\'t give a shit. But you\'re definitely sorta just stalking me around reddit. It\'s weird. >Sorry there is a dissenting opinion, I know it\'s scarce these days. I\'m not actually sure anything you\'ve said to me constitutes a dissenting opinion, buddy. Just odd questions and tangential statements.', '>>{BeowulfShaeffer} : So what role will he play in her Administration? Suppose Dems take the Senate - does he get something like Majority leader? Or at least chair a powerful committee?', ">>{ArcherGladIDidntSay} : Haha you didn't even acknowledge that you're all over the politics subreddit. It's not as if I'm following you around to obscure subreddits. As soon as I open a new thread it's a good chance you'll be contributing your subjective opinion. Sorry to creep you out, but it seems like you're the one with an obsession.", '>>{skribeiv} : No, you\'re just specifically targeting my comments. I don\'t need to acknowledge your pointless statement that I\'m "all over" the politics subreddit. You weren\'t (aren\'t?) really engaging with other people in those threads. I looked. People do sometimes read new. I\'ve had to stop, sadly, since I\'m spending an inordinate amount of time responding exclusively to you. See above.', ">>{ArcherGladIDidntSay} : So now you're admitting to creeping me? See you around the threads I suppose. Should I not engage with you?", ">>{skribeiv} : I have yet to do anything other than respond to your posts that show up in my inbox...and there are many. But I did check to see if you were just responding en masse to a lot of people, or just going from thread to thread to respond to me. Though, I guess you probably just went down my post history--unless you're legitimately creepy. I don't really care if you engage with me. Though I'd prefer you keep it to a single thread. You're annoying, if nothing else.", ">>{ArcherGladIDidntSay} : Sorry to disappoint. I'd say the same about your incessant posting.", ">>{skribeiv} : You're welcome to stop replying... I obviously have the right to post as much as I'd like. Do you think you have some claim over my agency there?", ">>{ArcherGladIDidntSay} : Am I not also allowed to post as much as I'd like? I wouldn't be interacting with you if you weren't in like every politics thread. The loudest people get the most responses.", ">>{skribeiv} : Of course you are, though following a single user around from thread to thread...and then complaining about how much they post...while simultaneously responding to them over and over again is a bit on the odd side. Again, I'm just responding to you. YOU keep replying to additional threads.", ">>{ArcherGladIDidntSay} : I haven't followed you anywhere though..I think you're paranoid.", '>>{brad3378} : Sanders supporters still seem quite polite considering what the Podesto emails said about them.'], ['>>{TheDevourerOfDreams} : Given all the evidence, it should be obvious to any clear thinking person that Team Trump colluded with the Russians. There are too many coincidences for it to be...well....a coincidence.', ">>{Flatineer} : Hopefully they're investigating fox, I having a feeling that might just be plan ol' psyops. EDIT, once they go fox they're always right no matter what....", '>>{Hankey01} : I swear to god if all of this is proven to be false, I will shit on liberalism for years to come', ">>{AnotherPersonPerhaps} : This doesn't have a goddamn thing to do with liberalism. Shit, we are trying to make Pence the President right now. He, presumably, will be much more effective at passing right wing policy than Trump will be or has been so far. This isn't about politics. It's about treason. There are prominent conservatives that want him gone too.", '>>{RoastedWithHoney} : Colluded to do what? Did they commit a crime? Given the reach of Russia information campaign should we investigate everyone with ties to Russia? Former Bush AG Mukasey discussing the Russian narrative on CNN, the whole interview is really good. He makes the case that even if there was an email of Trump asking Russia to find dirt on Hillary he still would not have committed a crime. https://youtu.be/Pjo16QamjIc', '>>{1TipsyCoachman} : The victim of treason is always America and American citizens.', '>>{RoastedWithHoney} : So how did Trump victimize America and American citizens?', ">>{1TipsyCoachman} : If you are talking specifically treason, we are in the first stages of getting all the info through the Senate investigation. So far, we know his constant retweeting of Russian propaganda and lies was definitely engineered. Grab some popcorn, it's a great show. Once all the facts are in from the investigation then we can make a complete list. If you are talking about how Trump hurts America and Americans generally, that list is extremely long. It can be summarized by stating that every action he takes is either unconstitutional, hurts those citizens least in a position to mitigate the damage, furthers propaganda and lies, destroys America's natural resources, undermines the ability of our government to serve the people, tarnishes and damages our reputation overseas, alienates our allies, increases terrorism recruitment, and breaks promises we have made that stabilize the world order.", '>>{RoastedWithHoney} : I am sure Trumps tweets were planned, it was a big part of his campaign. I am not sure you can prove he was retweeting Russian propaganda and how that would be treason if you could. As for not liking his policies as being a reason to accuse him of treason, that is quite the stretch. Just not liking someone is not a solid foundation for accusations of treason.', '>>{1TipsyCoachman} : Did you watch the hearing yesterday? The tweeting thing is already established.', ">>{RoastedWithHoney} : I did not, I know it's a long shot but do you have a clip?", '>>{1TipsyCoachman} : There is a monster megathread with links to the full hearing.', '>>{RoastedWithHoney} : I will listen to the hearing today at work, I was hoping to have a quick reference for the tweeting part. Thanks.'], ['>>{lovely_sombrero} : Oil Company Openly States They Will Defy Army Corps Order in Standing Rock', '>>{ivsciguy} : Army Corps of Engineers could call the Army Corps of Combat for backup.', '>>{scarletsoda} : Well there goes the victory for standing rock. Now we have corporations openly declaring their intention to subvert rule of law.', '>>{SmellGestapo} : Wasn\'t this website on the "official list" of websites that are fake news?', '>>{harglblarg} : From the horse\'s mouth: http://ir.energytransfer.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=106094&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2227348 "As stated all along, ETP and SXL are fully committed to ensuring that this vital project is brought to completion and fully expect to complete construction of the pipeline without any additional rerouting in and around\xa0Lake Oahe. Nothing this Administration has done today changes that in any way."', ">>{ive_lost_my_keys} : I don't know but it sure loaded like shit on mobile with all those ads.", '>>{onetoughmotherfucker} : This one isn\'t "official" cause IDK who would make it official but it was compiled by a journalism professor: http://d279m997dpfwgl.cloudfront.net/wp/2016/11/Resource-False-Misleading-Clickbait-y-and-Satirical-%E2%80%9CNews%E2%80%9D-Sources-1.pdf Free Thought Project is listed as a (3) meaning > uses hyperbolic or clickbait-y headlines and/or social media descriptions, but may otherwise circulate reliable and/or verifiable information.', '>>{Percival_Snugglebutt} : Translation: "We\'ll wait until our one investor is in the White House before pushing this."', ">>{eeyore102} : Bet they don't get rubber bullets, stun grenades, and tear gas, though.", '>>{SmellGestapo} : Some professor made a list. Looks like this site is in category 3: > CATEGORY 3: Other websites on this list sometimes use hyperbolic or clickbait-y headlines and/or social media descriptions, but may otherwise circulate reliable and/or verifiable information. These websites are marked with a 3. So I guess this site is "just okay"? http://d279m997dpfwgl.cloudfront.net/wp/2016/11/Resource-False-Misleading-Clickbait-y-and-Satirical-%E2%80%9CNews%E2%80%9D-Sources-1.pdf', '>>{lovely_sombrero} : I hope NY Times is in Category 1 for their 2003 Iraq lies?', ">>{CornCobbDouglas} : Aren't they not allowed to operate on US soil? That's for national guard.", ">>{eeyore102} : yeah, people who don't get brought up on charges when they do something wrong, people who are free to evade whatever taxes they like, and people who ~~bribe~~ ~~pay~~ lobby to get whatever laws passed that most benefit them.", '>>{Phluffhead024} : >“The White House’s directive today to the Corps for further delay is just the latest in a series of overt and transparent political actions by an administration which has abandoned the rule of law in favor of currying favor with a **narrow and extreme political constituency.** Ya, those savages and their clean water.', '>>{BombaFett} : Trump actually sold his stake. [source](http://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/05/trump-sells-his-stake-in-dakota-access-pipeline-developer.html)', ">>{DivinePotatoe} : Good bet considering he had money invested in the pipeline's construction.", '>>{eshemuta} : I got to the first ad and noped on out of there. Not gonna read it.', '>>{jacquedsouza} : You know, instead of the narrow and extreme political constituency that is the oil lobby. Would love to see the police tactics on those guys.', ">>{Eric_the_Barbarian} : I'd be happy to just see them turn the water cannons and concussion grenades on the work crews. But we know who the fuzz works for.", '>>{fat_osvaldo} : EPA: We need to wait for the Environmental Impact Assessment Energy Transfer Partners: New phone who dis?', ">>{fat_osvaldo} : I wonder what's a larger group of people: The oil lobby or the population of this area", ">>{neuromorph} : So, where are the local militias? this is literal 'go time'!!!!", '>>{DreadTrumpVI} : Too bad theyd have to remove to violent terrorists camped out there because the corp of engineers is closing the land they are on. So if they complain about the pipeline, which is 100 percent legal, avoiding the corp then it makes them hypocrites.', ">>{JackOfTrades11} : It's so frustrating trying to scroll through the story with ads popping up and bringing you back to the top of the page.", '>>{Roundhouse1988} : First of all, these are non violent protestors expressing their constitutional rights, the main camp lies on reservation tribal land, and some of the resistance camps lie on army corp of engineers land which is Treaty land. This pipeline was passed through a corrupt institutional framework that needs to be fought against; this pipeline is just as legal as the trail of tears, wounded knee, and many of the countless injustices against Native people.', '>>{HillaryBrokeTheLaw} : All the news fit to print was already taken', '>>{magusg} : If people can die, then corporations need to have that option as well.', ">>{Caracaos} : Leave Energy Transfers LLP alone! He's a good boy, he didn't do nothin'!", '>>{5pointlight} : yeah thanks alot court reporter for Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. 1886.', ">>{lovely_sombrero} : Shouldn't we be a country of law and order?", '>>{Buttarang} : No. When the protesters actually break the law, it\'s all love and support to them for standing up to the "evil" corporations and the corrupt government. This is despite the fact that the pipeline is trying to prevent the number and magnitude of oil spills (compared to rail transport) by following an existing pipeline under the Missouri that never crosses any tribal land, *whatsoever*. When my side just threatens to break the law I ought to be allowed the same luxury.', ">>{lovely_sombrero} : >When the protesters actually break the law What law? It is their land or in some places federal land and they have their 1st Amendment right... What law are they breaking? >When my side just threatens to break the law I ought to be allowed the same luxury. I get the argument. I don't have to obey the law, because I think someone else does not as well. Here is the map of tribal lands as per 1853 Fort Laramie Treaty http://www.workers.org/wp-content/uploads/StandingRockMap.jpg", '>>{KrasnyRed5} : It was going to be a short lived victory anyway. The parent company is just going to wait for Trump to come into office and restart the project.', '>>{cymric} : It is complicated. The POTUS can either declare a state of emergency or suspend the writ of habeas corpus to do it.', ">>{Rudyrobbob} : Just think of how much Other People's Money you can spend when you're a corporation.", '>>{roterghost} : I can break the law if somebody else does first? Am I hearing you right?', ">>{mawnicker} : [That](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor)'s bigoted. [Corporations](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leviathan) *are* [people](https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/ba/96/c0/ba96c01d0b28d1f9dbce6a6091697a59.jpg).", '>>{RomanNumeralVI} : Defy an order? There is no "order". They just have to revise a report and then reapply. Then all is good.', ">>{Folsomdsf} : Army: No Oil Company : We'll do it anyhow Population: Get the popcorn", ">>{ray1290} : It's pretty stupid to claim that NYT lied to help bolster a **Republican** president's war. You don't seem to be aware that journalists are not omniscient, or you don't realize that NYT is liberal.", '>>{LugganathFTW} : Native Americans? A narrow and extreme political constituency. But fuck immigrants am I right?!', '>>{savagedan} : I hope the Police go in and beat the living fuck out of these folks', '>>{deadletter} : How does suspending the writ of habeas corpus allow this action?', ">>{TrickOrTreater} : Nothing will change until these corporate fucker's heads start rolling out of baskets.", '>>{bigwalleye} : What a horseshit map. "majority white community" lol all of nd is a majority white community. Google standing rock rez map. It does not go through Indian lands. Sure 200 years ago it may have but not today! We have freedom of speech, but let\'s be honest, it\'s not really free. If I went to a classroom at an elementary school and started burping the alphabet to protest education I\'d get kicked out pretty fast.', '>>{CornCobbDouglas} : That sounds right because Bush was lawfully able to allow the army to help in Katrina in NOLA along with the national guard.', '>>{AlbinoWitchHunter} : Maybe you missed the memo but it is no longer 100% legal', '>>{mtthwas} : Well we just elected a corporation President... President The Trump Organization.', ">>{derangedly} : Corporations are people, therefore they can be criminals. Lock 'em up.", '>>{savagedan} : Thats what happened to the protesters, so fair seems fair', ">>{fight_me_for_it} : When NPR interviewed and reported about this the company spokesperson said it would go through. I'm not surprised. What bothers me is call for privitization of tribal lands. Ridiculous. .", '>>{lamabaronvonawesome} : Watch it happen. I love the name calling though!', ">>{factsRcool} : If it's a *white* corporation I expect peaceful resolution with little to no violence", '>>{factsRcool} : Cops tip their hats and say "hi Mr Koch"', '>>{factsRcool} : Sadly nearly the whole MSM was lying along with the Republican administration back then', '>>{HollowUkuleleChords} : We are ruled by an oligarchy. This is just the beginning. We need to take a stand against them, in everything they do.', ">>{Cfpod} : He's not an investor. You are aware of that, right?", ">>{Buttarang} : No, you're not hearing me correctly. If the protesters break the law you can still support them, and support the law too if you accept the legal repercussions of their activity. I'm supporting the oil company in the same way.", '>>{Buttarang} : You do *not* get the argument. I can *support* someone that breaks the law AND support the law if I accept the consequences of their actions, *especially* if you first support the other side in exactly the same way. They\'ve blocked public roads. They\'ve refused to leave federal land. They\'ve created pyres of old tires to separate themselves from police and the national guard. Clearly more legal activity has redefined the borders of the land *legally* belonging to the tribes. Whether or not that activity was moral, and whether the tribes have a moral claim to the land beyond the reservation (which, for the record, I believe wasn\'t and that they do) is not relevant to a legal discussion. Source for the "archaeological sites," please.', '>>{lovely_sombrero} : >They\'ve blocked public roads. Like every protest ever? >They\'ve refused to leave federal land. Like every protest ever? >They\'ve created pyres of old tires to separate themselves from police and the national guard. Aaaand? By the way - what is the national guard doing there? >Clearly more legal activity has redefined the borders of the land legally belonging to the tribes. The treaty still stands. If the government chose to unilaterally break the treaty, that just means the government is breaking its own laws. If you call that "more legal activity" - fine. >Whether or not that activity was moral I am not talking about morality. I am talking about treaties and the law. >Source for the "archaeological sites," please. Don\'t care about archaeology. I care about the treaty.', '>>{lamabaronvonawesome} : Oh, I am talking about Trump approving the pipeline. :)', ">>{Buttarang} : Other protests breaking the law doesn't mean this protest didn't also break the law. National Guard is there, along with ND state troopers, to aid in enforcing that law. The [Treaty of Fort Laramie **(1868)**](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Fort_Laramie_(1868) still stands. This superseded the [Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Fort_Laramie_(1851).", ">>{lovely_sombrero} : That is not what the National Guard is for. >National Guard units can be mobilized for federal active duty to supplement regular armed forces during times of war or national emergency declared by Congress,[20] the President[20] or the Secretary of Defense.[21] They can also be activated for service in their respective states upon declaration of a state of emergency by the governor of the state or territory in which they serve, or in the case of Washington, D.C., by the Commanding General. Unlike U.S. Army Reserve members, National Guard members cannot be mobilized individually, except through voluntary transfers and Temporary Duty Assignments (TDY). >Other protests breaking the law doesn't mean this protest didn't also break the law How are they breaking the law? >The Treaty of Fort Laramie (1868) still stands. This superseded the Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851). 1868 treaty just gives them more land. It does in no way change the 1851 treaty, unless you can cite the relevant part of it that does?", '>>{Cfpod} : Read back through these comments and try again. They said "an investor into the White House". Trump is not one.', '>>{lamabaronvonawesome} : Sure, but the gist is he will OK the pipeline. :)'], [">>{Cenbe2} : Can't WAIT for Mexico to start arresting all those Yankees overstaying their visas.", '>>{TinyBaron} : Breitbart does fake news like [this.](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/07/german-police-quash-breitbart-story-of-mob-setting-fire-to-dortmund-church?CMP=share_btn_fb) Relevant video : http://youtu.be/hqQsnMipW4Q What chanting sounds like : https://youtu.be/5YHQkED__To', '>>{Carp328} : What? The other Shitefart article says that the ICE raids are fake news.', '>>{CarbonatedConfidence} : [Oh look! More propaganda!](http://i.imgur.com/1vnmOpb.gif)', '>>{ChuckFromPhilly} : Not about politics. State sponsored propaganda. Redditor for ten days with posts on t_d describing how he was to do this to antagonize.', ">>{Creddit999} : And how many are actually criminals? Oh yeah, facts don't matter on Breitbart.", '>>{silentbob_} : If Breitbart is an unacceptable source why is it allowed on this sub?', '>>{KEK555} : CNN does fake news like [this](http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kristine-marsh/2016/08/15/cnn-selectively-edits-police-shooting-victims-sisters-words) Or [this](http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/11/21/cancel-the-debate-cnn-caught-selectively-editing-trumps-muslim-comments/) Or [this](https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/25142-selective-editing-cnn-changes-trump-s-message-about-russian-hacking) Or [this](http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/16/cnn-host-claims-its-illegal-for-public-to-view-wikileaks-emails-video/) Or [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2KT17KBTWE) Or [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzY_h6OpnoQ) Or even [this](http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-10/leaked-footage-exposes-cnn-producing-fake-news-during-first-gulf-war)', ">>{Themostunderdisturb} : Mexico has no problem sending illegal aliens back to their country, they apparently don't have a regressive party but instead have common sense.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : See ICE does it's job. No need to be xenophobic.", '>>{argsblarg} : Citing from shit sources? You think you are making a point by citing from shit sources? Really? You probably think you are clever for citing from such garbage. Youtube is NOT a valid source!', ">>{2pumpTrump} : I'm starting to notice that Breitbart posters use the American flag flair rather than state flair. Why is this?", '>>{Schiffy94} : And you do shit like [this](http://puu.sh/u0het.png). Get out of here.', ">>{KEK555} : Good evidence is still good evidence regardless of its origin. Sources aside, what exactly do you find wrong with the evidence other than the sources? I'll give you a bit to answer that. Have you read and analyzed the articles? Have you reviewed the evidence? Have you reviewed the claims? Probably not. Come back to me when you have.", '>>{2pumpTrump} : I thought it was because conservatives are embarrassed about the state they live in.', ">>{2pumpTrump} : Because my speculation isn't a definitive answer. I can see how you think though. Also, where did you get the idea that liberals find the flag offensive? I have one hanging on the wall in my home. And what state harbors you, fellow American?", ">>{Creddit999} : Yeah. I understand that. But how best to deal with people like that woman who's been here for 20 years and is a functioning citizen with a family of legal US citizens? Round her up and deport her on no notice? Is Mexico her country at this point? Gestapo tactics aren't the answer in all cases. It's depressing and complicated.", '>>{TheKasp} : Actually, the evidence sucks if the source is not trustworthy. It is a basic concept when regarding sources in a serious manner and not just to attempt getting fake internet points.', '>>{Buttocks} : > Also, where did you get the idea that liberals find the flag offensive? [Not safe to display American flag in American high school](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/02/27/not-safe-to-display-american-flag-in-american-high-school/?utm_term=.44dfc8b5edc8)', ">>{Themostunderdisturb} : You mean the lady who stole a legal immigrant's social security number and got caught, had a trial, had a appeal and was told she would be deported and then got deported? That lady? The one who committed a felony and was told she would be deported?", '>>{VROF} : I know someone who was brought here illegally as a child, they were caught and sent home and she was brought back. She has built a life here, is married to an American and has a baby. She can only work under the table; she is the best house cleaner I have ever seen. Ever. She should be able to work for a real company, pay taxes and not live in fear. Instead she is working for cash cleaning homes. They have spent thousands of dollars on attorneys trying to get her citizenship but because she was deported once she is being told it will never happen. That is idiotic.', ">>{Colinm478} : Not really. If your first act in the United States is a crime, you shouldn't be here.", ">>{KEK555} : You read the headlines, not the articles. If you'd have read the articles as well, then you wouldn't be making this comment.", ">>{Creddit999} : If that's the story, then fine. I had not read the details in that case. It's not clear what the actual criteria are these days. Too much happening.", '>>{Themostunderdisturb} : There should only be one criteria, are you legally allowed to be in the US? If no then you get deported. Same as it should be in any country in the world.', ">>{2pumpTrump} : Oh yeah, when the courts have to teach conservative children how to use tact and civility because no one teaches them at home. [Here's a proud conservative who loved the flag](http://static5.businessinsider.com/image/55316148eab8ea59068b456a-480/timothy-mcveigh.jpg). Not all conservatives, but 'your type' love to jam your opinions, white-bread culture, and politics into everyone's face like it's the word of a god, but also love to cry and curl up in a ball when someone stands up to you. Now, I'm sorry, I missed where you said you were from?", ">>{RayWencube} : No, it isn't. It's a civil violation.", ">>{RayWencube} : It isn't a crime; it's a civil violation.", ">>{Buttocks} : > Not all conservatives, but 'your type' love to jam your opinions, white-bread culture, and politics into everyone's face like it's the word of a god, but also love to cry and curl up in a ball when someone stands up to you. You don't even know me.", ">>{KEK555} : Breitbart doesn't violate any of the rules, but is majorly disliked on this sub since the majority of r/politics is extremely left-leaning.", ">>{Colinm478} : Wrong, it's a misdemeanor and repeated attempts are felonies.", '>>{argsblarg} : It\'s not "good" evidence. Get a skeptical brain in your head. Learn to check facts. That\'s the problem in our country - people insisting on believing things that sound good. And before you even THINK of accusing me of doing the same, I\'m way ahead of you. No, I learn everything I can about an issue that I can - unlike most people.', '>>{RayWencube} : That\'s improper entry--meaning coming here without ever having legal authorization to do so. Nearly half of "illegal" immigrants are here as a result of over-staying visas. Someone being here undocumented is *not* in and of itself a crime; they have to have also come here originally without legal authorization.', ">>{2pumpTrump} : heh, I don't even know what state you live in...lol", '>>{Colinm478} : Would you like to continue shifting the goal posts?', ">>{KEK555} : Okay, so if you're willing to say that this evidence isn't good evidence, then you **must** have a good reason to say so, right? Because 'I DONT LIKE THE SOURCE!' **isn't an argument**.", ">>{argsblarg} : I don't like the source the IS a good reason!!! Because they have PROVEN to be lying sackks of shit - like YOUR sources. So, instead of arguing with me, how about you spend some time learning about skepticism and critical thought, M-Kay?! And then we'd have a better society, M-Kay?! And you are now BORING me with stupid rhetoric and questions!", ">>{FlyDungas} : I think it's more that Breitbart is run by really bad people, nobody I know, liberal or conservative, would be caught reading it", ">>{KEK555} : You may think that, but considering that the #2 post in the 'Hot' section is from CNN... the rest don't really share that opinion.", ">>{KEK555} : Ignorance is Bliss is a quote that really represents you here. '*I'll call everything I disagree with 'garbage', therefore, I no longer have to learn anything that opposes my current opinions.*'", '>>{Buttocks} : Then why are they always setting it on fire?', '>>{KEK555} : Alright then, how have my sources been "PROVEN to be lying sackks of shit" ? > So, instead of arguing with me, how about you spend some time learning about skepticism and critical thought, M-Kay?! I do. It\'s why I haven\'t been a liberal for about nine months now; and it\'s why I review my evidences, and check my sources. > And you are now BORING me with stupid rhetoric and questions! You mean questions that you can\'t answer?', '>>{Schiffy94} : Calling everything anti-Trump "fake news" doesn\'t work anymore. Gorka already ruined that narrative by outright admitting that they were going to say it about anything that opposed his administration.', '>>{treerat} : >since the majority of r/politics is extremely ~~left~~ fact-leaning. fixed it', '>>{KEK555} : This is the same subreddit that called the executive order "EXECUTIVE ORDER: PROTECTING THE NATION FROM FOREIGN TERRORIST ENTRY INTO THE UNITED STATES" a \'**Muslim ban**\', when it\'s really not? Yeah, I\'m gonna go and say that you didn\'t fix it.', ">>{Muvseevum} : Because they don't know about state flags in their country.", '>>{Muvseevum} : Criterion is the singular in our language.', '>>{preserved_fish} : The president and his spokesman called it a muslim ban. Were they lying?', ">>{KEK555} : When did the president and his spokesman call it a muslim ban? Edit: Sorry, downvotes aren't the same thing as evidence.", ">>{RayWencube} : I didn't shift the goal posts. Being here without authorization is not a crime. Unless and until ICE states that these are aliens who committed improper entry, the *only* thing we know is that they are in violation of a civil law. Therefore, not criminals. Moreover, even if they are suspected of coming here illegally, they are only *suspected* of committing a crime. Meaning they still wouldn't be criminals--in the eyes of the law, at least--unless and until they are convicted.", ">>{Colinm478} : Yes, you did. I clearly said 'illegally entering the US is a crime' to which you responded 'No, it isn't. It's a civil violation'. Do you have a reading disability or something?", ">>{KevinsFamousChilli} : I've been a liberal my whole life. Do you know how many times I've put a flag on fire? Answer: zero. Besides the fact that you are making stuff up, what's wrong with freedom of speech. You're demigod Milo seems to think the left is trying to stop freedom of speech, but from your comment it seems like you may be opposed to it. It must suck to be a hoodwinked and confused conservative.", ">>{RayWencube} : You're right. I was assuming you were conflating them being here with them coming in because that is a very common conflation. I apologize. But that doesn't justify the personal attack.", ">>{2pumpTrump} : I'm proud to be American too! I'm also proud to be from California! How 'bout you are you proud of where you live?", '>>{KEK555} : Nowhere near as much as George Soros paid you.', ">>{prey4mojo} : I notice you don't have the American flag displayed... are you one of these flag hating liberals you speak of? :-/", '>>{KEK555} : **I\'ve read it. Regardless of President Trump wanting a Muslim ban, the executive order he passed isn\'t a Muslim ban** ------------------------- I\'m gonna go ahead and copy-paste an argument from a week ago. ----------------- One thing people need to be made aware of is that: **The executive order has nothing to do with Muslims whatsoever.** Seriously, it doesn\'t. If you want, here is the full script of the executive order. [**EXECUTIVE ORDER: PROTECTING THE NATION FROM FOREIGN TERRORIST ENTRY INTO THE UNITED STATES**](https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/27/executive-order-protecting-nation-foreign-terrorist-entry-united-states) * The executive order addressed only 7 out of 50 Muslim-majority countries. * None of the 7 countries weren\'t even in the top 5 largest Muslim-majority countries. * It doesn\'t target already-vetted refugees in the USA who\'ve been here for a while. * It doesn\'t target American-born Muslims. * It doesn\'t even say "Muslim(s)" or "Islam" even once ----------------------- A Muslim ban would be extremely reasonable in my opinion. Islam supports terrorism and violence, in every country Muslims spread to, Sharia and violence spread as well. Even if most Muslims aren\'t terrorists, a huge amount of them support terrorism, engage in misogynistic practices, support pedophilia (even their prophet is a pedo), practice honor killings, advocate sharia law, pour acid on their wives and beat them, engage in rape of women who aren\'t covered head-to-toe, etc. Europe has suffered due to the massive amounts of muslim \'refugees\'. Especially Sweden, it has become the rape capital of the world ever since it has let in such a massive amount of refugees. At least Japan did what was wise and shut its borders to refugees ever since they let 27 in, and 2 have gang-raped and robbed a woman. ------------------------------------------------ Another from not too long ago. ------------------------- Even then, former president Barack Obama imposed immigration restrictions 19 times. Four times on Muslim-majority countries. http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/obama-3-575x75.jpg http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/obama-2-575x562.jpg http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/obama-1-575x539.jpg', '>>{prey4mojo} : You have really only been on reddit for 11 days? Or is this a dummy/troll throw away account? If not, how do you feel about white christian conservative terrorists like the one who recently murdered 6 in Canada? And how should we best go about keeping them out of our country?', ">>{KEK555} : > You have really only been on reddit for 11 days? Or is this a dummy/troll throw away account? My previous Reddit account was compromised by hackers. > If not, how do you feel about white christian conservative terrorists like the one who recently murdered 6 in Canada? Christian terrorism certainly sometimes happens. Most of the time it isn't in the name of Christianity, but, it isn't a threat; although the attack in Canada was an unfortunate event and should not have happened. > And how should we best go about keeping them out of our country? Terrorism in the name of Christianity is rare, and isn't big enough to be an issue. Muslim terrorism, however, is.", '>>{prey4mojo} : Sorry to hear about your account. But certainly murder in general is a bigger issue than terrorism. I read somewhere that it is 1/3 of one percent of deaths. It seems irrational to ban travel for large swaths of people for the sake of such a small threat. Do you think the threat of islamic terrorism on US soil has been exaggerated for political reasons?', ">>{KEK555} : > But certainly murder in general is a bigger issue than terrorism Yes, it is; but unlike radical Islamic terrorism, general 'murder' doesn't have a specific root. > I read somewhere that it is 1/3 of one percent of deaths. It seems irrational to ban travel for large swaths of people for the sake of such a small threat. Do you think the threat of islamic terrorism on US soil has been exaggerated for political reasons? See, all of this talk about how there haven't been many crimes from people from those countries, how unlikely it is to be attacked by refugees on U.S. soil, etc. are misleading. That's because we haven't taken in so many refugees! Proportional to the size and population of other countries, we haven't taken in so many. Even then, our vetting process is tougher than many other countries (Even though it could definitely use some fixing and reviewing). If you want to see what the effects of refugees are, look at the refugee crisis all across Europe. Even though a tough vetting system makes it less likely that refugees like the ones in Europe will get through, I still think that we shouldn't let refugees in whatsoever! It's not that I don't want to help **actual** refugees, it's just that we don't need the risk. Even with peaceful refugees, it's not necessary. It costs way less to relocate 'refugees' within their own country, and refugees should be helped in their country, not by being brought to another country. It just doesn't work."]]

classify and reply

[">>{smorri14} : McFly, you bojo! Those boards don't work on water.....unless you've got power!", ">>{GhostofHowardTV} : And every other commenter hit the back button, disappointed they couldn't say it first.", ">>{Vaxien} : My guess is they based it off the song by F.L.Y. It's fun to dance to leave me alone ; n ;", ">>{pmmeurmoney} : Idk if it's just me but I would never purchase a product with 'swag' in its name.", ">>{SketchyPixel} : Uh... like a surfboard, minus the water contact? I'll take 20.", '>>{CruzHole} : You have to use it in water? WTF...', ">>{MrNerd82} : This thing could make me hover/fly and look like the coolest bastard at the beach. I'd zoom by - titties would fly out of tops for me, but since I'd be going so fast I'd have to rely on the onboard happy ending machine. But wait -- they named it the SwagSurf? Sorry, I don't want it anymore.", '>>{Black_Felon} : I agree with you, Fagsurf has a much better ring to it.', '>>{Yamserigo} : Yeah but why would I want that though', ">>{89fruits89} : Wow... first kook sups in the lineup now this shit. Dear god please don't become popular."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{smorri14} : McFly, you bojo! Those boards don't work on water.....unless you've got power!", ">>{GhostofHowardTV} : And every other commenter hit the back button, disappointed they couldn't say it first.", ">>{Vaxien} : My guess is they based it off the song by F.L.Y. It's fun to dance to leave me alone ; n ;", ">>{pmmeurmoney} : Idk if it's just me but I would never purchase a product with 'swag' in its name.", ">>{SketchyPixel} : Uh... like a surfboard, minus the water contact? I'll take 20.", '>>{CruzHole} : You have to use it in water? WTF...', ">>{MrNerd82} : This thing could make me hover/fly and look like the coolest bastard at the beach. I'd zoom by - titties would fly out of tops for me, but since I'd be going so fast I'd have to rely on the onboard happy ending machine. But wait -- they named it the SwagSurf? Sorry, I don't want it anymore.", '>>{Black_Felon} : I agree with you, Fagsurf has a much better ring to it.', '>>{Yamserigo} : Yeah but why would I want that though', ">>{89fruits89} : Wow... first kook sups in the lineup now this shit. Dear god please don't become popular."]]

classify and reply

[">>{ZoneRangerMC} : Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1 fills the S Pen void left by the Note 7", '>>{alegxab} : other than the fact that is too big for a phone?', ">>{TechGirlMN} : Gee and I had a Note so I didn't have to carry a tablet.", '>>{Wpgjetsfan19} : But does it start on fire? If not do not want', ">>{archaeolinuxgeek} : It's a literal void. With enough Galaxy 10s and spackle you can usually repair the smoldering hole in the wall.", ">>{Gr33n5murf} : the note 7 being discontinued hasn't magically made the older versions disappear...just use one of those?", '>>{flapsflapsflaps} : 5 is sick, had it for a year and my gfs 4 pales in comparison to how good mine feels. Fast slick phone, still brand new after all this time.', '>>{wattalameusername} : Also fills the void in your pocket and side from previous explosions.', '>>{Idonteatbirdpoop} : Having used all previous notes the note 7 is/was so much better.', ">>{Slipsonic} : Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1 covers up the scorch mark left by the Note 7 FTFY", '>>{PM-ME-UR-TITS-2-GIRL} : *Also, removes external storage* Ahh... So good', ">>{PM-ME-UR-TITS-2-GIRL} : Has there been any word about what the plan is for the note 7? As far as a re-release? I love mine... I don't want to give it up :/ it's awesome...", '>>{balrogsamson} : Fuck yeah! Got the 2012, and I know whst my wifes getting for Christmas now!', '>>{BAMFndPI} : When this baby explodes it will take off a limb', '>>{Superwhitenite} : *plugs in headphone* Huh. Feels familiar.', '>>{GeneralGorgeous} : Ya but then you lose all that sweet samsung advertising money.', ">>{flapsflapsflaps} : Don't have the need I suppose :) It's a fair point, but the slickness for me is #1 edit: cmon. people have different needs. I get it you worry about features and max value but i dont whatsoever, i dont care about battery or sd card or lazer beams.", '>>{DonUdo} : had a Samsung device years ago (S2), but flashing custom recoveries and roms was a pain. Is it easier today?', '>>{Idonteatbirdpoop} : Agreed. Very surprised how happy I am with pixel XL post note 7', ">>{Removal_of_Sanity} : It's more that the note 7 left a crater rather than a void.", '>>{MoreFlyThanYou} : You will have the need one day. My note 4 started turning off if it got to 15% battery or below. That just became the new 0%. $15 later and the phone holds a charge like new.', ">>{ambiturnal} : Get rid of it. It's endangering you and other people and property that may not belong to you.", '>>{Freefall84} : Apparently as soon as a new phone is released everyone is expected to discard their old phones in case they don\'t appear "cool"', ">>{swellblitz} : As someone who had a 5 and a 7, I can't really go back. Lack of SD card slot, surprisingly different camera (for the worse), and lack of always on display are just a few things that the momentary touch of the Note 7 spoiled me with. I ended up getting an S7 Edge but everyday I yearn for the S-Pen. In the end I figured the Edge was similar enough for me to feel okay with (just okay), and that could carry me through until the new Note (which I won't make the mistake again of preordering).", '>>{hockeyboi} : You mean fills the craters left by the note 7.', ">>{ImanShumpertplus} : I've had mine for a year and I haven't had any problems, but according to /r/android my phone lags, doesn't have enough storage for anything, and my battery only lasts for 3 hours at a time", ">>{OurSponsor} : The buttons are on a short side, not a long side, and the stereo speakers are too. So if you're using it to watch video, the sound is all coming from one side and you'll accidentally push the buttons while holding it... They got it right with the 2014 10.1. Why'd they screw it up here?", ">>{OurSponsor} : I won't miss the accidentally touching the screen because it wraps around to where you hold the damn thing... I do not understand how the edge-wrap screen is considered in any way a good thing.", '>>{sloth_on_meth} : I love how google jumped on advertising when the note 7 fiasco happened. Kept them from jumping to IOS. In the ad video, after "3.5mm headphone jack. Satisfyingly, not new" they should add "doesn\'t explode - satisfyingly not new" lol', ">>{flapsflapsflaps} : Might happen, I'll just go take it to service and get it changed. Saves me some time over doing it myself (backcover is glued supposedly but possible to take off) and even a couple hundred to solve that problem for another year is no big deal considering how nice this phone feels every day. If strapped for cash it would be a problem so everyone's got their own criteria.", ">>{Launchy21} : The Mi Note 2 is a better fit for that void, I'd say.", '>>{firechar-kurai} : Exactly. Plus landscape orientations is WAY better than portrait', ">>{land8844} : People are forgetting that the Note 5 is still barely a year old, yet think it's incredibly outdated. Meanwhile, /r/Nexus6P (also barely a year old) is raving about how awesome our phones are.", '>>{ViveRift} : I will never ever again own a phone without exchangeable battery. Fast charging, power banks is NOT a solution', '>>{busterplasma} : No it doesn\'t it\'s too big to put in your pocket. The Samsung tab 8 " fills the gap, it has S PEN and still fits in your pocket...added bonus it\'s waaaaaaaaay cheaper.', ">>{DigThatFunk} : I mean, it depends. If you're one of the people that trade up every generation, or even every other generation, you likely won't be experiencing problems like that before it's time to trade up anyway. Sure, if you want to be able to use the same phone for years on end, I think that's a perfectly acceptable criteria to have a removable battery. But myself, I won't need a new battery before I get a new phone so I much prefer built in fast charge, wireless charge, waterproofing, and aesthetic to the the convenience of a removable battery", ">>{morrispated2} : The note 7 is done and dead. I won't be surprised if Samsung pushes up the release date of the S8 and makes an S8 plus that comes with the larger screen, edge design and s pen but I think the note line is dead.", ">>{Alyscupcakes} : But how will I start my fire when I'm camping?", '>>{Alyscupcakes} : Nope, my heart still has a void. RIP Note 7', ">>{accountnumberseven} : Those were the odds back when Samsung thought it was a battery problem. Lots of misinformation out there, but since the issue isn't contained to one specific batch it's a bit worrisome to keep them hanging around.", '>>{rube} : But you can make phone calls on it. :) Yeah, I\'m just being a tool. But really, is a smartphone even really a "phone" these days. They\'re god damned pocket-computer internet-machine fancy-graphics devices that just happen to be able to make phone calls. I forgot to slip the word \'porn\' in there somewhere, but you get the gist.', '>>{SoundEmbalmer} : Striving to be above the rest, the 7 flew too close to the sun. *sob*', '>>{Z3US_94} : If its not laggy when writing I might get one', ">>{corvett} : But does it have a stylus? I know there's that LG phone with a stylus, but the tip of it is so *bulky*! I like having the precision of the S Pen", ">>{w1n5t0nM1k3y} : I've been contemplating just getting a nice tablet and tethering it to cheap phone for internet connectivity when I'm due for an upgrade.", ">>{JoshyandGuitar} : You can get tablets with an Internet connection, my gf's parents have 6 lines and 5 people in their family, 1 line is straight up just their tablet", ">>{Flame_Effigy} : This doesn't fill the void left from having to downgrade to the s7 edge. Or the hole in my heart. From the note. Exploding. Also, I still have my note because Verizon won't even take it back in the store I gotta mail it in a special box that's supposed to be sent to my house, which I'm sure never will. Tried to return the phone three different times, declined every time. No wonder people are still using theirs. I'm stuck with this money sink. What was I talking about? Oh right, also this isn't a phone so no it doesn't.", '>>{Konjyoutai} : *looks at his Note 4 with IR Blaster, Removable Battery, and Removable SD Card* "Eh, looks like you got a downgrade buddy. "', '>>{Konjyoutai} : That is because compared to the Note 4, which has a Removable Battery, SD Card, and IR Blaster; the Note 5 kind of sucks and is considered a downgrade. Even the battery is smaller at 3,000 mah vs 3,200 mah.', '>>{Sasuke911} : And what if it starts exploding ? It will "backfire".', ">>{land8844} : Good for you, you can read a spec sheet. I wasn't comparing anything.", ">>{Konjyoutai} : This beast's got 500-horsepower and a Borla exhaust system. It does 0-60 in what, 4.3 seconds?", ">>{zero_dgz} : Hey, you figured out Apple's and Samsung's marketing model. Have a cookie.", ">>{zero_dgz} : It's worse than that. The LG Stylo is also a mid-range phone at best. The stylus is not active, either, it's just a silicone tip stylus similar to what you could buy at the dollar store, only smaller. And the screen is garbage. It's not even a comparison to the original Note, let alone the Note 7.", ">>{Reddit_Plastic} : Not really, the shape of the phone means that the battery cells are bent together at the edges. This means that the battery can short much easier. It's more a matter of time for all devices rather than just a few Theres a very good x ray of the device showing this", '>>{KEVLAR60442} : I expected the Pixel to flop, but I guess the Note 7 saved the Pixel line.', '>>{zero_dgz} : ...And has been out of production for 3 years? (Still have mine, though.)', '>>{zero_dgz} : The Note Tab series predates the iPad Pro by almost half a decade, dude.', ">>{w1n5t0nM1k3y} : Yeah, but I don't want to pay for a second connection and I want the option to leave the tablet at home when I won't need it.", '>>{flytheflag} : Perfect! Just what i was looking for, a bigger blast radius.', '>>{allme2016} : But I NEED to pay $800 for quad core processors for Facebook and Snapchat !!!', ">>{pmdevita} : Except it's specs are a large step down from the previous Note 10.1. Samsung, stop fucking with me and give us an real Note tablet", '>>{proanimus} : Naming the sixth version the "Note 7" is probably what makes everyone think the Note 5 is older than it is.', '>>{proanimus} : Apple is definitely guilty of pushing their latest models hard, but they do support the old ones longer than anyone else.', ">>{pmdevita} : The Note series has a better pen too. They're using Wacom tech", ">>{rboymtj} : That's why I started with the Note series in the first place. Back when I got the Note 2 when it came out people laughed about the size of my phone, but those assholes were carrying around an ipad and a phone.", ">>{rboymtj} : It's not like the thing is a hand grenade. It's a battery pop and a small flame. Yes, a very hazard, but it's not going to level your neighborhood.", ">>{rboymtj} : Do you have a link to details about that? I haven't heard a good explanation about the mechanics of the problem.", ">>{rboymtj} : The last thing I want Samsung to do is rush to release anything. That being said, they should make their regular S8 line with varients and still make a Note for the target demographic (used to be business people.) Doesn't have to be flashy, doesn't need an edge. Just needs good specs, a good screen, an s-pen and removable battery/SD card.", '>>{Chair_Toaster} : I heard it was the best due to its sensitivity. Is this S pen one better and faster?', ">>{Superdan645} : And that it won't explode. I really need an exploding phone.", '>>{TheNastyCasty} : On the contrary. I found that the Note 7 was MUCH better at exploding than the previous notes', ">>{pmdevita} : The s pen does not need to charge and it handily stores inside the device. I don't really know of any real numbers for sensitivity but in my experience I've never struggled with it, it's very responsive. Wacom is also the top (and usually only) choice for professional artists which I think is a pretty good testament to their stuff", '>>{paffle} : LG seems to be one of our last hopes in this direction. If LG were to make a phone with a proper stylus I would be pretty interested.', '>>{Kapparino1104} : You mean Gear Icon X? Which has its own storage (4GB, up to 1000 songs), with exercise functions? Yeah.', ">>{PatternPerson} : Today I swapped my note 5 battery and I didn't have any of the parts for it. Costed about the same for a normal battery", ">>{ozymandiaa} : Has no one here heard of the Note 5? You don't actually NEED the newest, fanciest gadget. I had the Note 4 and begrudgingly upgraded to the Note 5 in July, and it's freaking awesome. There is literally nothing the Note 7 had that was all that much different from the 5. Just use a Note 5 til they fix the 7 or release the next iteration.", '>>{Syntriphics} : Check out the LG stylo2. Super nice phone', ">>{paffle} : Thanks for the tip but I'm put off by the low-resolution display and the fact that the stylus appears to be one of those squishy-tipped passive things. It would feel like too much of a downgrade after a Note 4.", ">>{Idonteatbirdpoop} : Hard to say if it saved it, but it certainly helped. I'm starting to like it more than note 7.", '>>{busterplasma} : 3 years ??...just bought mine 4 months ago...best decision l ever made.', ">>{omega_dawg93} : I've got the 2014 note 10.1 tablet and the galaxy note 3. both devices are steady, reliable work horses... no complaints from me. samsung needs to stop trying to directly compete with apple and should instead focus on business heavy products like the note series. to me, apple is about social media: pics and video. Android, and in particular, Samsung products are about multitasking, high tech, flexible, business tools. typed using word flow on my iPhone 6s.", ">>{PorkRindSalad} : It's so funny that you mentioned exploding, because the Note7 totally used to explode. Like at least several of them. People even made jokes over and over about it. And over.", ">>{AvatarWaang} : I'm pretty sure there's a leak that said there's not going to be a new Note: instead, we're looking at the Galaxy s8 and s8 Plus", ">>{bglampe} : I downgraded back to a Note 5 and tried to make the nest of it. After doing some new customizations, I feel like it's a new phone. Definitely holds up. Too bad about the SD card though. I don't miss having to constantly worry about space. Thank God Google Photos loads videos at a reasonable speed.", ">>{paloian} : I've been looking into getting a new tablet, you think I should spring for this or wait for the Galaxy tab s3?", ">>{ozymandiaa} : I was a long-time iPhone user so I don't even notice the lack of an SD card. I had honestly forgotten that expandable memory in a phone was even a thing.", '>>{davecarldood} : never had the note 5 when my note 4 broke i got the same one again because of the expandable storage.', '>>{flapsflapsflaps} : Do you need an sd card and a removable battery for facebook and snapchat?', ">>{Qixotic} : *gets on international flight and doesn't get arrested* You're wither with us or you are with the Note 7s.", ">>{CyanTheory} : TSA won't be able to tell the difference, you'll get tackled to the ground and tazed as soon as you show your phone.", ">>{CyanTheory} : And if they could make one that doesn't bootloop, that'd be nice.", '>>{bglampe} : I think it really depends on the pen. The S2 is much higher quality than the 10.1, has a much better processor, and more storage. I would imagine the S3 blows it out of the water. However, I plan to primarily use it as a notepad so the pen is the most important feature.', '>>{TurtleMcCunt} : How/where did you go to get your note 5 battery swapped out for the same price as the battery?', '>>{PatternPerson} : Amazon had the battery and tools for like 15 dollars.', ">>{TurtleMcCunt} : You did it yourself? Damn I don't have that much courage", ">>{PatternPerson} : Yep! I didn't have a heat gun so I used a blow dryer instead. I was nervous about doing it but it honestly wasn't too bad in the end", '>>{ajscilingo} : Member Newtons?!? Palm Pilots??!! Treos?!?! MEMBER!!???']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{ZoneRangerMC} : Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1 fills the S Pen void left by the Note 7", '>>{alegxab} : other than the fact that is too big for a phone?', ">>{TechGirlMN} : Gee and I had a Note so I didn't have to carry a tablet.", '>>{Wpgjetsfan19} : But does it start on fire? If not do not want', ">>{archaeolinuxgeek} : It's a literal void. With enough Galaxy 10s and spackle you can usually repair the smoldering hole in the wall.", ">>{Gr33n5murf} : the note 7 being discontinued hasn't magically made the older versions disappear...just use one of those?", '>>{flapsflapsflaps} : 5 is sick, had it for a year and my gfs 4 pales in comparison to how good mine feels. Fast slick phone, still brand new after all this time.', '>>{wattalameusername} : Also fills the void in your pocket and side from previous explosions.', '>>{Idonteatbirdpoop} : Having used all previous notes the note 7 is/was so much better.', ">>{Slipsonic} : Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1 covers up the scorch mark left by the Note 7 FTFY", '>>{PM-ME-UR-TITS-2-GIRL} : *Also, removes external storage* Ahh... So good', ">>{PM-ME-UR-TITS-2-GIRL} : Has there been any word about what the plan is for the note 7? As far as a re-release? I love mine... I don't want to give it up :/ it's awesome...", '>>{balrogsamson} : Fuck yeah! Got the 2012, and I know whst my wifes getting for Christmas now!', '>>{BAMFndPI} : When this baby explodes it will take off a limb', '>>{Superwhitenite} : *plugs in headphone* Huh. Feels familiar.', '>>{GeneralGorgeous} : Ya but then you lose all that sweet samsung advertising money.', ">>{flapsflapsflaps} : Don't have the need I suppose :) It's a fair point, but the slickness for me is #1 edit: cmon. people have different needs. I get it you worry about features and max value but i dont whatsoever, i dont care about battery or sd card or lazer beams.", '>>{DonUdo} : had a Samsung device years ago (S2), but flashing custom recoveries and roms was a pain. Is it easier today?', '>>{Idonteatbirdpoop} : Agreed. Very surprised how happy I am with pixel XL post note 7', ">>{Removal_of_Sanity} : It's more that the note 7 left a crater rather than a void.", '>>{MoreFlyThanYou} : You will have the need one day. My note 4 started turning off if it got to 15% battery or below. That just became the new 0%. $15 later and the phone holds a charge like new.', ">>{ambiturnal} : Get rid of it. It's endangering you and other people and property that may not belong to you.", '>>{Freefall84} : Apparently as soon as a new phone is released everyone is expected to discard their old phones in case they don\'t appear "cool"', ">>{swellblitz} : As someone who had a 5 and a 7, I can't really go back. Lack of SD card slot, surprisingly different camera (for the worse), and lack of always on display are just a few things that the momentary touch of the Note 7 spoiled me with. I ended up getting an S7 Edge but everyday I yearn for the S-Pen. In the end I figured the Edge was similar enough for me to feel okay with (just okay), and that could carry me through until the new Note (which I won't make the mistake again of preordering).", '>>{hockeyboi} : You mean fills the craters left by the note 7.', ">>{ImanShumpertplus} : I've had mine for a year and I haven't had any problems, but according to /r/android my phone lags, doesn't have enough storage for anything, and my battery only lasts for 3 hours at a time", ">>{OurSponsor} : The buttons are on a short side, not a long side, and the stereo speakers are too. So if you're using it to watch video, the sound is all coming from one side and you'll accidentally push the buttons while holding it... They got it right with the 2014 10.1. Why'd they screw it up here?", ">>{OurSponsor} : I won't miss the accidentally touching the screen because it wraps around to where you hold the damn thing... I do not understand how the edge-wrap screen is considered in any way a good thing.", '>>{sloth_on_meth} : I love how google jumped on advertising when the note 7 fiasco happened. Kept them from jumping to IOS. In the ad video, after "3.5mm headphone jack. Satisfyingly, not new" they should add "doesn\'t explode - satisfyingly not new" lol', ">>{flapsflapsflaps} : Might happen, I'll just go take it to service and get it changed. Saves me some time over doing it myself (backcover is glued supposedly but possible to take off) and even a couple hundred to solve that problem for another year is no big deal considering how nice this phone feels every day. If strapped for cash it would be a problem so everyone's got their own criteria.", ">>{Launchy21} : The Mi Note 2 is a better fit for that void, I'd say.", '>>{firechar-kurai} : Exactly. Plus landscape orientations is WAY better than portrait', ">>{land8844} : People are forgetting that the Note 5 is still barely a year old, yet think it's incredibly outdated. Meanwhile, /r/Nexus6P (also barely a year old) is raving about how awesome our phones are.", '>>{ViveRift} : I will never ever again own a phone without exchangeable battery. Fast charging, power banks is NOT a solution', '>>{busterplasma} : No it doesn\'t it\'s too big to put in your pocket. The Samsung tab 8 " fills the gap, it has S PEN and still fits in your pocket...added bonus it\'s waaaaaaaaay cheaper.', ">>{DigThatFunk} : I mean, it depends. If you're one of the people that trade up every generation, or even every other generation, you likely won't be experiencing problems like that before it's time to trade up anyway. Sure, if you want to be able to use the same phone for years on end, I think that's a perfectly acceptable criteria to have a removable battery. But myself, I won't need a new battery before I get a new phone so I much prefer built in fast charge, wireless charge, waterproofing, and aesthetic to the the convenience of a removable battery", ">>{morrispated2} : The note 7 is done and dead. I won't be surprised if Samsung pushes up the release date of the S8 and makes an S8 plus that comes with the larger screen, edge design and s pen but I think the note line is dead.", ">>{Alyscupcakes} : But how will I start my fire when I'm camping?", '>>{Alyscupcakes} : Nope, my heart still has a void. RIP Note 7', ">>{accountnumberseven} : Those were the odds back when Samsung thought it was a battery problem. Lots of misinformation out there, but since the issue isn't contained to one specific batch it's a bit worrisome to keep them hanging around.", '>>{rube} : But you can make phone calls on it. :) Yeah, I\'m just being a tool. But really, is a smartphone even really a "phone" these days. They\'re god damned pocket-computer internet-machine fancy-graphics devices that just happen to be able to make phone calls. I forgot to slip the word \'porn\' in there somewhere, but you get the gist.', '>>{SoundEmbalmer} : Striving to be above the rest, the 7 flew too close to the sun. *sob*', '>>{Z3US_94} : If its not laggy when writing I might get one', ">>{corvett} : But does it have a stylus? I know there's that LG phone with a stylus, but the tip of it is so *bulky*! I like having the precision of the S Pen", ">>{w1n5t0nM1k3y} : I've been contemplating just getting a nice tablet and tethering it to cheap phone for internet connectivity when I'm due for an upgrade.", ">>{JoshyandGuitar} : You can get tablets with an Internet connection, my gf's parents have 6 lines and 5 people in their family, 1 line is straight up just their tablet", ">>{Flame_Effigy} : This doesn't fill the void left from having to downgrade to the s7 edge. Or the hole in my heart. From the note. Exploding. Also, I still have my note because Verizon won't even take it back in the store I gotta mail it in a special box that's supposed to be sent to my house, which I'm sure never will. Tried to return the phone three different times, declined every time. No wonder people are still using theirs. I'm stuck with this money sink. What was I talking about? Oh right, also this isn't a phone so no it doesn't.", '>>{Konjyoutai} : *looks at his Note 4 with IR Blaster, Removable Battery, and Removable SD Card* "Eh, looks like you got a downgrade buddy. "', '>>{Konjyoutai} : That is because compared to the Note 4, which has a Removable Battery, SD Card, and IR Blaster; the Note 5 kind of sucks and is considered a downgrade. Even the battery is smaller at 3,000 mah vs 3,200 mah.', '>>{Sasuke911} : And what if it starts exploding ? It will "backfire".', ">>{land8844} : Good for you, you can read a spec sheet. I wasn't comparing anything.", ">>{Konjyoutai} : This beast's got 500-horsepower and a Borla exhaust system. It does 0-60 in what, 4.3 seconds?", ">>{zero_dgz} : Hey, you figured out Apple's and Samsung's marketing model. Have a cookie.", ">>{zero_dgz} : It's worse than that. The LG Stylo is also a mid-range phone at best. The stylus is not active, either, it's just a silicone tip stylus similar to what you could buy at the dollar store, only smaller. And the screen is garbage. It's not even a comparison to the original Note, let alone the Note 7.", ">>{Reddit_Plastic} : Not really, the shape of the phone means that the battery cells are bent together at the edges. This means that the battery can short much easier. It's more a matter of time for all devices rather than just a few Theres a very good x ray of the device showing this", '>>{KEVLAR60442} : I expected the Pixel to flop, but I guess the Note 7 saved the Pixel line.', '>>{zero_dgz} : ...And has been out of production for 3 years? (Still have mine, though.)', '>>{zero_dgz} : The Note Tab series predates the iPad Pro by almost half a decade, dude.', ">>{w1n5t0nM1k3y} : Yeah, but I don't want to pay for a second connection and I want the option to leave the tablet at home when I won't need it.", '>>{flytheflag} : Perfect! Just what i was looking for, a bigger blast radius.', '>>{allme2016} : But I NEED to pay $800 for quad core processors for Facebook and Snapchat !!!', ">>{pmdevita} : Except it's specs are a large step down from the previous Note 10.1. Samsung, stop fucking with me and give us an real Note tablet", '>>{proanimus} : Naming the sixth version the "Note 7" is probably what makes everyone think the Note 5 is older than it is.', '>>{proanimus} : Apple is definitely guilty of pushing their latest models hard, but they do support the old ones longer than anyone else.', ">>{pmdevita} : The Note series has a better pen too. They're using Wacom tech", ">>{rboymtj} : That's why I started with the Note series in the first place. Back when I got the Note 2 when it came out people laughed about the size of my phone, but those assholes were carrying around an ipad and a phone.", ">>{rboymtj} : It's not like the thing is a hand grenade. It's a battery pop and a small flame. Yes, a very hazard, but it's not going to level your neighborhood.", ">>{rboymtj} : Do you have a link to details about that? I haven't heard a good explanation about the mechanics of the problem.", ">>{rboymtj} : The last thing I want Samsung to do is rush to release anything. That being said, they should make their regular S8 line with varients and still make a Note for the target demographic (used to be business people.) Doesn't have to be flashy, doesn't need an edge. Just needs good specs, a good screen, an s-pen and removable battery/SD card.", '>>{Chair_Toaster} : I heard it was the best due to its sensitivity. Is this S pen one better and faster?', ">>{Superdan645} : And that it won't explode. I really need an exploding phone.", '>>{TheNastyCasty} : On the contrary. I found that the Note 7 was MUCH better at exploding than the previous notes', ">>{pmdevita} : The s pen does not need to charge and it handily stores inside the device. I don't really know of any real numbers for sensitivity but in my experience I've never struggled with it, it's very responsive. Wacom is also the top (and usually only) choice for professional artists which I think is a pretty good testament to their stuff", '>>{paffle} : LG seems to be one of our last hopes in this direction. If LG were to make a phone with a proper stylus I would be pretty interested.', '>>{Kapparino1104} : You mean Gear Icon X? Which has its own storage (4GB, up to 1000 songs), with exercise functions? Yeah.', ">>{PatternPerson} : Today I swapped my note 5 battery and I didn't have any of the parts for it. Costed about the same for a normal battery", ">>{ozymandiaa} : Has no one here heard of the Note 5? You don't actually NEED the newest, fanciest gadget. I had the Note 4 and begrudgingly upgraded to the Note 5 in July, and it's freaking awesome. There is literally nothing the Note 7 had that was all that much different from the 5. Just use a Note 5 til they fix the 7 or release the next iteration.", '>>{Syntriphics} : Check out the LG stylo2. Super nice phone', ">>{paffle} : Thanks for the tip but I'm put off by the low-resolution display and the fact that the stylus appears to be one of those squishy-tipped passive things. It would feel like too much of a downgrade after a Note 4.", ">>{Idonteatbirdpoop} : Hard to say if it saved it, but it certainly helped. I'm starting to like it more than note 7.", '>>{busterplasma} : 3 years ??...just bought mine 4 months ago...best decision l ever made.', ">>{omega_dawg93} : I've got the 2014 note 10.1 tablet and the galaxy note 3. both devices are steady, reliable work horses... no complaints from me. samsung needs to stop trying to directly compete with apple and should instead focus on business heavy products like the note series. to me, apple is about social media: pics and video. Android, and in particular, Samsung products are about multitasking, high tech, flexible, business tools. typed using word flow on my iPhone 6s.", ">>{PorkRindSalad} : It's so funny that you mentioned exploding, because the Note7 totally used to explode. Like at least several of them. People even made jokes over and over about it. And over.", ">>{AvatarWaang} : I'm pretty sure there's a leak that said there's not going to be a new Note: instead, we're looking at the Galaxy s8 and s8 Plus", ">>{bglampe} : I downgraded back to a Note 5 and tried to make the nest of it. After doing some new customizations, I feel like it's a new phone. Definitely holds up. Too bad about the SD card though. I don't miss having to constantly worry about space. Thank God Google Photos loads videos at a reasonable speed.", ">>{paloian} : I've been looking into getting a new tablet, you think I should spring for this or wait for the Galaxy tab s3?", ">>{ozymandiaa} : I was a long-time iPhone user so I don't even notice the lack of an SD card. I had honestly forgotten that expandable memory in a phone was even a thing.", '>>{davecarldood} : never had the note 5 when my note 4 broke i got the same one again because of the expandable storage.', '>>{flapsflapsflaps} : Do you need an sd card and a removable battery for facebook and snapchat?', ">>{Qixotic} : *gets on international flight and doesn't get arrested* You're wither with us or you are with the Note 7s.", ">>{CyanTheory} : TSA won't be able to tell the difference, you'll get tackled to the ground and tazed as soon as you show your phone.", ">>{CyanTheory} : And if they could make one that doesn't bootloop, that'd be nice.", '>>{bglampe} : I think it really depends on the pen. The S2 is much higher quality than the 10.1, has a much better processor, and more storage. I would imagine the S3 blows it out of the water. However, I plan to primarily use it as a notepad so the pen is the most important feature.', '>>{TurtleMcCunt} : How/where did you go to get your note 5 battery swapped out for the same price as the battery?', '>>{PatternPerson} : Amazon had the battery and tools for like 15 dollars.', ">>{TurtleMcCunt} : You did it yourself? Damn I don't have that much courage", ">>{PatternPerson} : Yep! I didn't have a heat gun so I used a blow dryer instead. I was nervous about doing it but it honestly wasn't too bad in the end", '>>{ajscilingo} : Member Newtons?!? Palm Pilots??!! Treos?!?! MEMBER!!???']]

classify and reply

['>>{SCarolinaSoccerNut} : Why Republicans are struggling in the battle for millennial voters', '>>{PersianKing} : Is a portable battery bad for iPhone battery health?', ">>{vakenT} : Is charging you're phone bad for you're battery? Because afaik it's the same thing, just this comes from a portable power source and now a wall socket.", '>>{Lysergh} : Electricity from a wall socket goes through an iPhone/iPad charger and is converted to correct voltage. Electricity from a portable battery goes directly from the battery.', ">>{LongHuey} : Barnes and Noble's next Nook tablet might support the Google Play Store", ">>{HapticSloughton} : Don't they already do that? ...after rooting, of course?", '>>{drf24} : They mean without rooting. I think you know that too and are using being a wise-ass.', ">>{Idolglows} : Actually Donald Trump got more primary voters out on his side than any Republican candidate.... ever. Plenty of them were young voters as well. If anyone is struggling for votes it's Hillary Clinton who no one really wanted in the first place. Have you ever talked to someone who was JAZZED about Hillary? Me neither.", ">>{PersianKing} : It's the same premise as using a fake apple cable, it's not designed for apple products and might cause surges and damage the internal battery.", ">>{jcv999} : I didn't root mine... i have the play store", '>>{ivsciguy} : Because their socially conservative values are wildly out of step with young people. We grew up with openly gay friends and relatives, we know people of different races, we talk to people from other countries and religions regularly. To be a social conservative is to be a traitor to your friends and family. The GOP has clearly shown during this convention that they have no real ideas beyond hating people that are different from them. No thanks.', ">>{vakenT} : I get it, thought it wouldn't be a problem, you're probably right. Sorry for misleading you, OP.", '>>{Nadest013} : The verge... Yawn. Play store was already available on their older tablets.', ">>{mexrell} : I had to do it with my mom's kindle awhile back wasn't to hard but it's nice you don't have to do it", '>>{sglville} : There is no way a 50000mah battery is $9.59. Get a reputable brand like Anker if you are concerned.', ">>{AkirIkasu} : The Verge really needs to be banned from this sub. All they have is low-effort articles written by people who don't seem to understand what it is they are talking about.", '>>{Devan94} : Barnes & Noble announced they were dropping their line of Nooks. Guess not', '>>{Kurcide} : I know someone who works in their HR department. They fired the entire Nook division along with their tech departments to save costs and outsource any future iterations of the Nook. It will likely be a tablet manufactured by a 3rd party with Nook branding if they do anything at all. Similar to how they did their last lign with Samsung. However, this was a few months ago when they had someone else at the head of the company. The board forced him to resign and the founder stepped back in as CEO. With his re-entry they started adding "restaurant" additions to some stores in-place of the Cafés. The company was not and still seems to be in a pretty poor position.', '>>{AlienAndTroll} : There is a review: It is a big lie... 50000mAh should give you around 15-20 full carges.... This will give you 2 if lucky', '>>{rtv190} : B&N is usually the first place I visit whenever I go to the mall', '>>{sglville} : Its probably a 5,000mah not a 50,000. I have a 10,000mah Anker and I get about 3 full charges on my 6S Plus', ">>{SATexas1} : I tried to engage in a dialogue with some incredibly excited Hillary supporters but I couldn't speak Arabic.", '>>{AeternasLuce} : It kinda annoys me companies that swallow everyone and steal jobs.Looking at ya, Amazon.', '>>{DEYoungRepublicans} : True. I know quite a few young republicans that are hyped over Trump, and very few young democrats who are hyped about Hillary.', '>>{mcotter12} : Every winning candidate in a Republican primary at least back to the 70s had the most primary voters ever. It is likely true for the democrats as well. Its almost like the population is going up.', ">>{Bryman85} : But since it uses USB to connect it provides the agreed standard of ~5 volts output that your Apple charger does. The amperage difference won't hurt it because that is just the max that a device can pull while charging.", ">>{mcotter12} : Thing is there is 5% more democrats than republicans, and both parties are outnumbered by independent voters. Then, on top of having less people than other voting groups, they skew older. The young republicans might be enthusiastic about Trump, but most young people aren't Republicans.", '>>{IEatPizza} : Sounds about right, I also have a 10000 battery, barely use it but I always carry it daily', ">>{CharlieDarwin2} : The problem with the Republican party is that the tent is so full of rich white people, fundamentalist Christians, homophobes, xenophobes, conspiracy theorists and science-deniers that there isn't any room for anyone else.", '>>{FUCKSOFFATWORK} : I know the guy who created root my nook. I went to school with him.', '>>{007peter} : Yet you forget the same B&N stole customer away from smaller book store and cause a massive outcry in 1990. Heck, they even made a movie call "You Got Mail" starring Tom Hanks and Meg Ryans, which alluded to the force closure of books stores. What goes around comes around.', ">>{nowmakeyourthrowaway} : I had a first gen Nook. I did almost no research before buying it and quickly learned (once it was in my hands) that I would only have access to B&N's own little app store. But I told myself that was ok because B&N was a serious player in this game and they would totally deliver. It was badass for the first few months and I eagerly checked in a couple times a week to see all the new and exciting apps that were being released for it. About 8 months in, after I had played Angry Birds to death, I was bored and frustrated with the Nook and barely touched it anymore. The B&N app store contained very few quality releases and hadn't even released a facebook app by the time I passed my Nook on to goodwill and bought a Nexus 7. Had the Nook been more expensive it would have been the biggest tech flop I've ever purchased.", ">>{Idolglows} : I'm not sure about that since I don't have the data in front of me. You could be right. You could be wrong. It's almost like you're just assuming based on your best guess.", ">>{SCarolinaSoccerNut} : Millenials are actually the best-educated generation in American history. I would say young people are idealistic, but we're certainly not stupid.", ">>{IslamicShibe} : Baby boomers were highly educated for their time and look where they left us. School smarts is not everything, lots of millenials wouldn't be able to get by if they didn't have their parents. I say that as a millennial", '>>{JohnnyBravados} : Christian fundamentalism is pretty intense for people who are not part of that world. Most young people know a LGBT person, a Muslim, a single mother, a Latino, etc and are not as terrified of them as old people.', '>>{mcotter12} : https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/06/08/donald-trump-got-the-most-votes-in-gop-primary-history-a-historic-number-of-people-voted-against-him-too/ Here is the numbers. Not exactly more every year, but the Trump is not an outlier from the general trend.', ">>{a496h8} : > To be a social conservative is to be a traitor to your friends and family. This couldn't be further from the truth.", '>>{SCarolinaSoccerNut} : Not really. The real reason for the inability of the GOP to attract millennials in large numbers is because millennials, by and large, reject social conservatism entirely. They embrace marriage equality, immigration reform, multiculturalism, and religious diversity. As long as social conservatives and evangelicals run the show, the Republican Party will never be able to win over millennials.', '>>{ryan924} : How can I vote for people that want to restrict Gay rights, and then look my gay friends in the eye?', ">>{Idolglows} : I looked it up myself actually, and sure didn't take anything the liberal WP says for gospel lol. Trump is certainly an outlier. The last time anyone came even close was 16 years ago. 2008 - 9,902,797 primary voters for John McCain 2004 - 7,853,863 primary voters for George W. Bush 2000 - 12,034,676 for George W. Bush 1996 - 9,024,742 for Bob Dole 1992 - 9,199,463 for George H.W. Bush 1988 - 8,253,512 for George H.W. Bush 1984 - 6,484,987 for Ronald Reagan 2016 - 14,009,098 for **DONALD J. TRUMP MAGA**", ">>{alephnul} : >To be a social conservative is to be a traitor to your friends and family. >This couldn't be further from the truth. I suppose that depends on who your friends and family are, but we, as a nation, are becoming ever more diverse, so the chances of it being true for any one person are high and getting higher.", '>>{israfel070} : Only if your entire social circle is white... Helloooo kentucky', '>>{Ericbishi} : I think a lot of people are understanding that conservative republican ideals are not the platform for ever candidate.', '>>{ivsciguy} : How? I have friends that are gay, Muslim, immigrants, etc. Those social conservative strategies would directly harm them.', ">>{4CommunityJustice} : Republicans are struggling for young voters because WE are the majority of the young. POC and other marginalized groups ARE the political majority of the youth. WE are NOT going to join the old white power structure embodied by the GOP and WE are NOT going to join the new reactionary Trump group peopled by the old right and the blue dogs who disgracefully defected in order to save some of their privileged status. Young POC and other marginalized groups are NOT here to be pandered to. WE have OUR coalition within the democratic party and THAT is the future for OUR nation. The republican party and the white power system is being swept away by our peaceful democratic take-over. Demographically the white majority is less than two decades from dispersing. Already we have more than enough white allies to ensure that the white power structure's fate is sealed. OUR message of restitution and redress to the history of marginalization and oppression by the system of white majoritarian rule is the reason that millennials flock to OUR standard in the democratic coalition. White or marginalized, they realize OUR moral standards are the highest and OUR justice is THE justice for this generation. WE are righting wrongs, leveling playing fields, and bringing DOWN oppressive systems in the name of the voiceless. Young people are with US. They are against EVERYTHING represented by the old white majoritarian paradigm. Rigid social norams are foreign to them. Capitalist greed and excess that destroys the heart and soul of a multifaceted and diverse society are disgusting to them. Xenophobic hatred that divides people along arbitrary lines of nationhood, religion, and color are NOT understood by them as valid. OUR coalition to bring down those antique white notions of justice are the future. Demographics ensure OUR voices will take power. THEY will be with us.", ">>{MontyAtWork} : Wow, I'm glad that everything is so black and white and everyone just falls into these little pre-determined categories and time tables which completely negate technological and social changes (i.e. smart phones and the internet). We'll all be republicans soon enough, then we'll see just how right Trump was!", '>>{preposte} : My wife is a Muslim immigrant, so yes, it would be.', ">>{ivsciguy} : They were certainly made a part of the party platform and Trump's VP is pretty much THE social conservative.", ">>{0sigma} : That's a tent that could burn down and make the world a better place.", '>>{InFearn0} : > **RACHEL HOFF:** The folks that would still like to deny same-sex marriage are over-represented in the party’s platform committee, and in some ways that committee is actually out of step with the party as a whole. > **But it won’t be long before a majority of the Republican Party as a whole supports marriage equality.** This reads like a journal entry of someone with Stockholm Syndrome.', ">>{USEDGUACBOWLMERCHANT} : It is true that Millennials are fervently against social conservatism. But Islam, is social conservatism on fucking steroids and Millennials will die to protect that religion. It just doesn't make sense.", '>>{chris41336} : As a "POC" (stupid term), you don\'t speak for me. Get over your hatred of white people. We all bleed red, and souls don\'t come in different colors. The vision you have is for a divided world, where people focus more on their differences than their common humanity. That isn\'t the future I want for my children. I want to most past the race paradigm, not dig us deeper into it by claiming that evil white people are destroying the world.', ">>{chris41336} : It's true though. Most Republicans I know could care less about gay marriage, up to and including Trump. If there is one good think Trump has done, it has been the taming of the evangelical right to be a smaller factor in the party as opposed to the primary one. Don't let all of the GOd talk at the convention fool you, the Evangelicals have far, far less say in a Trump administration than they would have in any of the other GOP candidates.", '>>{chris41336} : Trump picked Pence to shore up the conservative base. Trump is not socially conservative himself, so he needed that.', ">>{InFearn0} : You are conflating protecting religion with protecting theocracy. Freedom of Religion means all Religions are tolerated as long as they don't break laws. Separation of Church and State means opposing theocracies. Be it Sharia Law or the [American Taliban](http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/American_Taliban).", ">>{the_glutton} : Trump's race was far more competitive for far longer than anyone else in recent memory. His campaign really stretched into May, which ensured people were going to turn out heavily. In context it's not terribly impressive.", '>>{chris41336} : I am a young person (and a mixed-race PoC) and what you say is absolutely true, I grew up with all of those things. I still will not be voting for Hillary, because my vision of the future for my children growing up like me - a vision of POST-RACIAL AMERICA, not a vision of super-racial America that the current Democrats wants. Bill Clinton said it best: "I believe that in ways large and small, peaceful and sometimes violent, that the biggest threat to the future of our children and grandchildren is the poison of identity politics that preaches that our differences are far more important than our common humanity." What happened to that perspective? Why must ending inequality somehow include pushing people apart instead of bringing us together, as Americans? Democrats talk a good game, but they don\'t mean what they say, otherwise "All Lives Matter" would not be seen as a racist term now and areas that are Democrat-run would be much better for minorities than they are.', ">>{the_glutton} : Millenial here. I left the Republican party because I couldn't support a party that turned friends of mine who are gay into second class citizens.", ">>{donglol} : All of that I bought before Pence and the RNC convention. Plenty of evangelical shit front and center. Trump himself may not buy into it, but he sure as shit isn't letting it die out.", ">>{chris41336} : That is what Trump does though. He puts on a show for them to make them feel important. That is all those crazy bastards want is to be made to feel important. When it comes to brass tacks, Trump is the decision maker, and as seen by his personal life, he certainly isn't a bible thumper. The evangelical influence won't disappear overnight, it will take time. Trump uprooting the party is step one. I wouldn't be surprised if this was the last RNC where we had to deal with this nonsense in full force.", ">>{InFearn0} : It doesn't matter what the majority believe. It matters what the platform committee members believe. The people that get onto the platform committee are those that are hardcore political activists. Which means they are more representative of the base, than the party as a whole. When Hoff asked for softer language, she was immediately attacked and accused of trying to use the term bigot to shut down opposition, despite not using the term. **The attacking delegate was cheered!** When bullies are cheered, dissent is suppressed. There is only one reason a LGBT person would be a Republican: They like tax cuts more than they like being treated politely (not nicely, just politely). They don't have to go to conventions to get those tax cuts, they just have to vote in the general election. So why would they?", ">>{chris41336} : As a Northeastern Republican, don't let those crazy people in the midwest and south fool you. They used to be Democrats, now they are Republicans - they will always leech of of one of the parties. But not all GOP are like that. Hell, I am an atheist. I just sit there and cringe through the bible-ey stuff.", '>>{chris41336} : That is true, but you change the platform committee by changing the majority. These parties are slow to change their internal infrastructure, but you are going to see it start happening now. These Committee People are likely "Old School" Evangelical GOP as they have traditionally been the most active. Ted Cruz-types.', '>>{InFearn0} : [63% of Democrats are Christian of some denomination](http://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/party-affiliation/democratlean-dem/)', '>>{ivsciguy} : I haven\'t seen any actions by Republicans that would bring anyone together. A couple of my good friends are Muslim and the GOP is straight up attacking them. In my state and many others the GOP is trying to make it harder and harder to vote in ways that disproportionately effect minorities. From everything I have seen the Democrats are trying to make people actually have equal rights, while the GOP is arguing that it is just identity politics. There is no clearer example than gay marriage and gay rights. The right is trying to keep a whole group of people from having equal rights, dividing them from others. At the same time they are claiming that gay people pushing to have equal rights is actually discrimination against conservatives and Christianity. No one thinks the actual statement "All Lives Matter" is racist, the problem is that many racists started pushing it just to attack Black Lives Matter. It is kind of like the term "America First." Most don\'t really have a problem with the sentiment, but if you look at the history of the phrase it was used as a xenophobic slogan against Jews.', '>>{Overly_Triggered} : And because due to things like the Southern Strategy, they tied their social conservative values to issues about the economy and personal liberties. So everything in their agenda is tainted.', '>>{nonades} : This might have something to do with it: https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/4ty4w7/steve_king_defends_comments_questioning_nonwhite/', ">>{USEDGUACBOWLMERCHANT} : keep spinning, keep pretending liberals don't hate Christians.", '>>{Overly_Triggered} : > a vision of super-racial America that the current Democrats wants. As another minority, I\'m going to need a valid source on that. The only places I hear that sort of rhetoric is Reddit and conservative attack ads. >otherwise "All Lives Matter" would not be seen as a racist term now. It\'s an unnecessary term that belittles the conversation. If conservatives really thought "all lives matter" is inclusive enough why are so many in favor of pushing the "blue lives matter" narrative? You can argue that it\'s due to targeted shootings against cops that have taken place recently. While someone would be technically right in saying that "blue" isn\'t inclusive of all lives, I\'m sure you could understand why the timing and argument would be inappropriate.', '>>{chris41336} : I know plenty of Democrats who also "dislike" Muslims for whatever reason, Bill Maher being a very popular one. That isn\'t just a GOP phenomenon. When I say "tear people apart", I mean by hyphenating everyone. I was mixed race so I never got to hyphenate my Americanism. I was just American. I couldn\'t choose between my white or hispanic side or my family. I loved all of them. What Democrats want is to divide people up into categories of people that they can pander to. Wanting true civil rights is not the same as wanting to tell people they are oppressed to extract votes. The GOP isn\'t perfect (at all), but the Democrat strategy is not helpful and they are so on their high horse that they refuse to change. On the national level, the things they say sound great, but putting their policies into play on the local level can have very disastrous consequences.', '>>{chris41336} : I don\'t like the Blue Lives Matter narrative, I agree with you. That is equally divisive and unnecessary, and I have told people that. For super-racial America, just look at what is going on. Race relations are at an all time low. In the late 90\'s/early 2000\'s, they were much better and it was because there was no emphasis on all of this "oppression" nonsense. Things were getting better organically. (Source: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/19/race-relations-reach-all-time-low-under-obama-poll/) On the Hispanic side of my family, the people who have succeeded are those who took advantage of what American society offered, not took advantage of their government or felt "oppressed" by another race or something. My uncle started a distribution company from Elizabeth, NJ and was able to pass that down to his children. He didn\'t expect anything from anyone, and had no education. He didn\'t complain about "white privilege", he just...worked hard and carved a life for himself. We need people in power who cater to THAT mentality, of entrepreneurship and working hard to get ahead.', ">>{Overly_Triggered} : Let's not make it all about social issues. Plenty of young people think pre-k and college are important. Many of them think minimum wage should at least somewhat keep up with inflation. They think the environment should be protected. They believe in climate change. They're fans of renewable energy. They think everyone should have healthcare. There are a lot of very basic issues that millennials care about which Republicans seem diametrically opposed to.", ">>{the_glutton} : I'm in the midwest. I had to leave.", ">>{Overly_Triggered} : > up to and including Trump. He really fucked that up with his VP pick. >taming of the evangelical right He did the opposite. He fired them up with baseless rhetoric. Let's not forget that Trump is the great businessman that was willing to hurt his own bottom line because of how passionate he was over Starbucks and their war on Christmas. The guy was willing to boycott them over their cup designs. >Evangelicals have far, far less say in a Trump administration He basically let them write the party platform. The latest stories show that he will basically have Pence do most of the work for him. If anything, they have more say now since Trump is more of a hands off type of boss.", '>>{Overly_Triggered} : I know a lot of people who aren\'t "hyped" about Hillary but are still gladly voting for her. This is politics. She\'s boring and a hard worker. That\'s why many people like her. Not everyone votes based on a cult of personality. And beyond that, there are a lot of young Republicans who are hyped up against Trump.', ">>{Overly_Triggered} : I've known plenty of people who have turned more liberal as they've grown older.", ">>{Overly_Triggered} : Of course they do. They tolerate it far more than Islam. It's just a bit rich when all these anti-gay, anti-women, anti-science Christians start claiming that their religion is right because Islam is worse.", '>>{sircool099} : ~~young people~~ rich white millennials*', ">>{BoSnowKnows} : The Democrats are a big part of that old white power structure as well. Don't be fooled.", ">>{MerryMacattack} : They're idiots. Social conservatism needs to die real quick if Republicans want a chance to start winning.", ">>{MerryMacattack} : This /r/politics has some sort of hard on for Cruz because he won't endorse Trump, and they just forget that this man ACTUALLY is homophobic and actually WOULD LET his Christian beliefs dictate how he acts as president.", '>>{MerryMacattack} : He also had to face off against a shit ton of other Republicans, with the entire Republican machine gunning against him the whole time. He is definitely an outlier.', '>>{chris41336} : Yes, it is blowing my mind the praise for a man who if had all the power in the world would put gays in conversion camps and put a bible in every classroom.', ">>{MerryMacattack} : They're educated, but not experienced. Not to mention that their education came from college campuses which almost always lean left and are more likely to implement a liberal bias in their teachings.", '>>{J_WalterWeatherman_} : > Don\'t let all of the GOd talk at the convention fool you, the Evangelicals have far, far less say in a Trump administration than they would have in any of the other GOP candidates. It amazes (and depresses) me how successfully Donald has been able to use his inconsistencies to cause each Republican to see in him whatever it is they want to see in a candidate. To Republicans that are anti-gay marriage, his selection of Pence and his list of Supreme Court pics signals that he will be a hard line religious conservative and will take rights away from gays. To Republicans that are pro-gay marriage, his former statements in support of gays (most of which also happen to be from a time period when he wanted to enact the biggest tax hike in history exclusively on the "super wealthy", was pro-choice and wanted universal healthcare) signal that he will protect gay rights, in spite of all his actions to the contrary in the current election. The truth is none of us know at all what Donald will do, because he has virtually no concrete policy positions, and the ones he does have are constantly changing.', ">>{J_WalterWeatherman_} : > That is what Trump does though. He puts on a show for them to make them feel important. How do you know that you aren't the one that the show is being put on for?", '>>{JohnnyBravados} : I agree but I see those as social issues. The anti-science agenda is an effect of the ultra-religious social conservatives having disproportionate power in that party to shape policy. Climate change? Obviously a secular conspiracy. Evolution? Just a politically correct attack on faith. Science is not important to people who see science as a threat to their ideology.', '>>{ivsciguy} : Over 2/3s of the party *are* Christians. They might not be your favorite brand of Christian, but they are believers.', '>>{ivsciguy} : I have been paying taxes for 14 years, and I have been paying a lot of taxes in a "real job" for almost 6 years. Has not had any effect at all on my views on social issues. Also, I live in a state with some of the lowest taxes in the country and it causing our state government, schools, infrastructure to fall apart. I would would be fine with paying the higher taxes my state had several years ago if it fixed such things.', ">>{ihavesensitiveknees} : I'm in my mid-30's. Out of probably 100 friends and family members under 40 that I know, there are probably about 3-4 Trump supporters.", ">>{SCarolinaSoccerNut} : There's no evidence apart from anecdotal that universities make their students more liberal. In fact studies usually find that students leave their university education with the same political leanings as they had when they started. The political leanings of university faculty tend to depend on the discipline. Professors in the humanities and most social sciences tend to be liberal. Professors in economics, business fields, and the applied sciences tend to be conservative/libertarian. Professors in the natural sciences tend to be apolitical, supporting whichever political party seems to be more pro-science at the time.", '>>{x86_64Ubuntu} : >...I mean by hyphenating everyone. I was mixed race so I never got to hyphenate my Americanism Ah yes, the old "it\'s their fault they are treated differently by the system because they *hyphenate* their groups".', '>>{alpha_dk} : If and when they "become new republicans", it will be after the republican party stops opposing the things they want. It won\'t just happen without movement. That said, in 10 years no one will be seriously talking about the culture wars we\'re fighting today, and yeah, once that happens some (Ds) will move (R).', ">>{ianandris} : By that same token, we also need people in power who recognize that hard work and success aren't always correlated. The hardest working people I've known in my life are poor. They have to work hard because the alternative is complete ruin. When an entire wing of the political system in the US is opposed to things like a minimum wage, public services that aren't the military, and unions in general, but simultaneously preaches the virtue of hard work, it's pretty easy to get the sense that that wing is focused on nothing more than what it can extract from people. I want a government that makes my life easier, not harder. I don't want to be lectured by old men who started out with with advantages I could never dream of on how to better a situation they can't possibly understand. I agree completely in the value of hard work. I just don't think most people are as lazy and when we talk about how to help them I don't think it's talking about enabling them or breeding dependency on government programs.", '>>{Crocoduck_The_Great} : > I know plenty of Democrats who also "dislike" Muslims for whatever reason, Bill Maher being a very popular one. That isn\'t just a GOP phenomenon. You can dislike a group and not want to persecute them.', ">>{sircool099} : those that go into the work force, primarily. dem's typically keep those that stay in college for far too long.", ">>{Crocoduck_The_Great} : His results are actually pretty in line with Bush's 2000 results, which was the most recent election that closely mirrors this one, an election coming off a Dem president with no incumbent. 2004 there was an uncontested primary, so of course it has low turnout. Also, why didn't you include 2012s 10,031,336 votes from Romney?", ">>{Crocoduck_The_Great} : > souls don't come in different colors. Or exist.", ">>{Crocoduck_The_Great} : Ah yes, the evils of learning things. But really, do you have any actual data to back that up? I've never seen anything that show republicans leading among *any* young demographics. If you know of polls/studies/data that actually back up your claim, I'm genuinely interested.", '>>{sircool099} : I really don\'t want to say "google is your friend" on these matters, but sadly I never save any of the reports or things that I see to support the statement to use later. Just goes over my head really. Best I can do atm: http://www.rollcall.com/news/home/millennials-more-and-more-a-swing-group-survey-says Also, learning useless knowledge is worse than knowing nothing at all.', '>>{straighttalk2016} : >For super-racial America, just look at what is going on. Race relations are at an all time low. In the late 90\'s/early 2000\'s, they were much better and it was because there was no emphasis on all of this "oppression" nonsense. Things were getting better organically. That\'s like saying things were better for trans people in the 90s because there was no emphasis on all of this "bathroom" nonsense. Just because certain people aren\'t talking about a problem doesn\'t mean it doesn\'t exist. For decades black and brown people have been abused and murdered by the police, including during your golden age of the late 90s/early 2000s. For decades black and brown people have been systemically discriminated against in matters of housing, education, the criminal justice system, healthcare, employment, etc. It has not gotten appreciably better organically for a large amount of people, and these people are suffering as a result. Let\'s look at just one aspect of employment, for example. Look at this article on a Princeton study on hiring bias in New York City: [https://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S11/23/70K64/index.xml?section=newsreleases](https://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S11/23/70K64/index.xml?section=newsreleases). It found, among other things that "Even without criminal records, however, black applicants had low rates of positive responses, about the same as the response rate for white applicants with criminal records. Hispanics also faced discrimination by employers, but were preferred relative to blacks." Do you not see a problem with that? Of course many individuals, like your uncle, succeed despite the odds all the time, and I\'m not saying that anyone should sit around and feel sorry for themselves. But to deny that there is a serious race problem in America is to deny reality.', '>>{chris41336} : I would argue that 90% of the discrimination you are citing against brown people, of which I am one, is financial rather than racial. Most "brown" people do not have the financial means that white people due, and that is primarily due to the fact that white people have been in the system longer. I saw it in my own family. My white side did have privilige, but it wasn\'t because of some conspiracy to keep brown people down. It was because over three generations of being in this country they had established a financial support infrastructure to have a parachute for each other. Investments and all that. The minority side of my family didn\'t and doesn\'t have that. They got here, had no credit, no investments from older folks, nothing. They had to forge ahead like my Irish relatives did generations ago, just now instead of years ago. As for murdered by police, see this study from Harvard published a week or so ago. Shootings have not been measurable more for blacks than whites (though overall violence seems to be): http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/12/upshot/surprising-new-evidence-shows-bias-in-police-use-of-force-but-not-in-shootings.html?_r=0 The exception to the above is African Americans who, because of two centuries of actual legislative discrimination, really DIDN\'T have a means to succeed in much of this country. That is unique to Hispanics arriving now. I have seen with my own eyes how hard it is to escape from even one generation of poverty, I can only imagine it compounds after several. That being said, my point about the "golden age" i listed above is that people were coming together racially. The "old racism" was almost dead (as in people who felt that way had to hide it, and fewer and fewer people felt that way), and vestiges of institutional racism would slowly die with it. Now, "old racism" (with people claiming racial superiority) is on an upswing, and it is frightening and unhelpful to anything. EDIT: For your Trans example, I would argue that nobody caring about what bathroom Trans people use is preferable to suddenly everybody caring, yes. But I sense that is the crux of our issue here. My view of progress is nobody caring, yours is everyone caring, and we will never resolve that difference. I only have one Trans friend, but they claim it was far easier back before any attention was put on all of this nonsense because of Charlotte deciding to make some misguided stand which lead to North Caroline doing the opposite and angering everyone. EDIT 2: Also, you say my uncle was an exception, and I agree. But success in the United States has ALWAYS been an exception, even among white people, since the beginning of this country. It isn\'t like every white person is successful and every minority isn\'t.', '>>{ivsciguy} : How long is too long? Cause I finished a five year program in four and turned all liberal...', ">>{NobodyLikesHipsters} : Further proof that Hillary Clinton is a Republican, right? Cause she can't seem to get the millenial vote either for practically the same reasons.", ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : As a millennial Trump supporter, I look around at my peers and I look at what they post on social media, and I see very, very few similarities with myself. We're in very different worlds. I'm a Trump supporter and they're constantly posting anti-Trump content, pro illegal immigration content, pro censorship of free speech content, content about white privilege, content about islamophobia, etc. None of them know that I support Trump, and I would likely be met with extreme vitrol and hatred by many if they knew. I'm very much in the Trump closet. Interestingly, all of my peers who post anti-Trump things all the time - they're constantly posting anti-Hillary things too. They pretty much all started as Bernie supporters. I have no idea what they'll do this election. I imagine that a few actually do support Trump but keep that fact hidden.", ">>{carlclashfan} : A shit ton of other Republicans who spent far more time attacking each other than him, as they assumed he'd fall flat on his ass and didn't want to alienate his supporters.", '>>{toolazyforaname} : To be fair, Bill Maher hates all religions equally.', ">>{Crocoduck_The_Great} : I did google for it and found nothing, which is why I asked the person making the claim for a source. And even the source you provided doesn't back up your claim that working young favor the republicans while college youth favor democrats. If anything, it implies the opposite since it said white youth are more likely to favor republicans than minority youth and white youth are also more likely to go to college.", '>>{neweraccount123} : >WE are NOT going to join the old white power structure Bahahahahhahhaahhahhahahahaaaaa', '>>{ihavesensitiveknees} : More like most of the people I know are educated, unlike the average Trump voter.', ">>{straighttalk2016} : How did you arrive at the conclusion that 90% of discrimination against brown people is financial rather than racial? That's wild speculation, and is ultimately meaningless. And if you honestly believe racism was dying out in that golden age, I have a bridge to sell you. Do you really think people are being racist now because it's popular? Do you believe that the racists now weren't racist before the Obama era? If so, I can only conclude that you were ignorant of what was really going on in that time period. I'm only guessing, but were you a child at this point in history (the aforementioned golden age)? My sense of progress is simply that everyone be treated equitably. Don't be obtuse. I mean that minority business owners and professionals face obstacles that white business owners don't, solely because of race. Everyone faces the usual obstacles to success, but the color of one's skin can contribute to additional obstacles.", '>>{chris41336} : If you really think that Minority Business Owners face different hurdles from everyone else, you live in a different reality from every minority business owner. Owning a business is hard no matter who you are. Nobody has ever hindered my family from doing anything in the business world because they are hispanic.', ">>{straighttalk2016} : Well there you have it. Open and shut case. It didn't happen to your family, so clearly it has never happened to anyone ever. Brilliant response, chris41336."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{LongHuey} : Barnes and Noble's next Nook tablet might support the Google Play Store", ">>{HapticSloughton} : Don't they already do that? ...after rooting, of course?", '>>{drf24} : They mean without rooting. I think you know that too and are using being a wise-ass.', ">>{jcv999} : I didn't root mine... i have the play store", '>>{Nadest013} : The verge... Yawn. Play store was already available on their older tablets.', ">>{mexrell} : I had to do it with my mom's kindle awhile back wasn't to hard but it's nice you don't have to do it", ">>{AkirIkasu} : The Verge really needs to be banned from this sub. All they have is low-effort articles written by people who don't seem to understand what it is they are talking about.", '>>{Devan94} : Barnes & Noble announced they were dropping their line of Nooks. Guess not', '>>{Kurcide} : I know someone who works in their HR department. They fired the entire Nook division along with their tech departments to save costs and outsource any future iterations of the Nook. It will likely be a tablet manufactured by a 3rd party with Nook branding if they do anything at all. Similar to how they did their last lign with Samsung. However, this was a few months ago when they had someone else at the head of the company. The board forced him to resign and the founder stepped back in as CEO. With his re-entry they started adding "restaurant" additions to some stores in-place of the Cafés. The company was not and still seems to be in a pretty poor position.', '>>{rtv190} : B&N is usually the first place I visit whenever I go to the mall', '>>{AeternasLuce} : It kinda annoys me companies that swallow everyone and steal jobs.Looking at ya, Amazon.', '>>{FUCKSOFFATWORK} : I know the guy who created root my nook. I went to school with him.', '>>{007peter} : Yet you forget the same B&N stole customer away from smaller book store and cause a massive outcry in 1990. Heck, they even made a movie call "You Got Mail" starring Tom Hanks and Meg Ryans, which alluded to the force closure of books stores. What goes around comes around.', ">>{nowmakeyourthrowaway} : I had a first gen Nook. I did almost no research before buying it and quickly learned (once it was in my hands) that I would only have access to B&N's own little app store. But I told myself that was ok because B&N was a serious player in this game and they would totally deliver. It was badass for the first few months and I eagerly checked in a couple times a week to see all the new and exciting apps that were being released for it. About 8 months in, after I had played Angry Birds to death, I was bored and frustrated with the Nook and barely touched it anymore. The B&N app store contained very few quality releases and hadn't even released a facebook app by the time I passed my Nook on to goodwill and bought a Nexus 7. Had the Nook been more expensive it would have been the biggest tech flop I've ever purchased."], ['>>{SCarolinaSoccerNut} : Why Republicans are struggling in the battle for millennial voters', ">>{Idolglows} : Actually Donald Trump got more primary voters out on his side than any Republican candidate.... ever. Plenty of them were young voters as well. If anyone is struggling for votes it's Hillary Clinton who no one really wanted in the first place. Have you ever talked to someone who was JAZZED about Hillary? Me neither.", '>>{ivsciguy} : Because their socially conservative values are wildly out of step with young people. We grew up with openly gay friends and relatives, we know people of different races, we talk to people from other countries and religions regularly. To be a social conservative is to be a traitor to your friends and family. The GOP has clearly shown during this convention that they have no real ideas beyond hating people that are different from them. No thanks.', ">>{SATexas1} : I tried to engage in a dialogue with some incredibly excited Hillary supporters but I couldn't speak Arabic.", '>>{DEYoungRepublicans} : True. I know quite a few young republicans that are hyped over Trump, and very few young democrats who are hyped about Hillary.', '>>{mcotter12} : Every winning candidate in a Republican primary at least back to the 70s had the most primary voters ever. It is likely true for the democrats as well. Its almost like the population is going up.', ">>{mcotter12} : Thing is there is 5% more democrats than republicans, and both parties are outnumbered by independent voters. Then, on top of having less people than other voting groups, they skew older. The young republicans might be enthusiastic about Trump, but most young people aren't Republicans.", ">>{CharlieDarwin2} : The problem with the Republican party is that the tent is so full of rich white people, fundamentalist Christians, homophobes, xenophobes, conspiracy theorists and science-deniers that there isn't any room for anyone else.", ">>{Idolglows} : I'm not sure about that since I don't have the data in front of me. You could be right. You could be wrong. It's almost like you're just assuming based on your best guess.", ">>{SCarolinaSoccerNut} : Millenials are actually the best-educated generation in American history. I would say young people are idealistic, but we're certainly not stupid.", ">>{IslamicShibe} : Baby boomers were highly educated for their time and look where they left us. School smarts is not everything, lots of millenials wouldn't be able to get by if they didn't have their parents. I say that as a millennial", '>>{JohnnyBravados} : Christian fundamentalism is pretty intense for people who are not part of that world. Most young people know a LGBT person, a Muslim, a single mother, a Latino, etc and are not as terrified of them as old people.', '>>{mcotter12} : https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/06/08/donald-trump-got-the-most-votes-in-gop-primary-history-a-historic-number-of-people-voted-against-him-too/ Here is the numbers. Not exactly more every year, but the Trump is not an outlier from the general trend.', ">>{a496h8} : > To be a social conservative is to be a traitor to your friends and family. This couldn't be further from the truth.", '>>{SCarolinaSoccerNut} : Not really. The real reason for the inability of the GOP to attract millennials in large numbers is because millennials, by and large, reject social conservatism entirely. They embrace marriage equality, immigration reform, multiculturalism, and religious diversity. As long as social conservatives and evangelicals run the show, the Republican Party will never be able to win over millennials.', '>>{ryan924} : How can I vote for people that want to restrict Gay rights, and then look my gay friends in the eye?', ">>{Idolglows} : I looked it up myself actually, and sure didn't take anything the liberal WP says for gospel lol. Trump is certainly an outlier. The last time anyone came even close was 16 years ago. 2008 - 9,902,797 primary voters for John McCain 2004 - 7,853,863 primary voters for George W. Bush 2000 - 12,034,676 for George W. Bush 1996 - 9,024,742 for Bob Dole 1992 - 9,199,463 for George H.W. Bush 1988 - 8,253,512 for George H.W. Bush 1984 - 6,484,987 for Ronald Reagan 2016 - 14,009,098 for **DONALD J. TRUMP MAGA**", ">>{alephnul} : >To be a social conservative is to be a traitor to your friends and family. >This couldn't be further from the truth. I suppose that depends on who your friends and family are, but we, as a nation, are becoming ever more diverse, so the chances of it being true for any one person are high and getting higher.", '>>{israfel070} : Only if your entire social circle is white... Helloooo kentucky', '>>{Ericbishi} : I think a lot of people are understanding that conservative republican ideals are not the platform for ever candidate.', '>>{ivsciguy} : How? I have friends that are gay, Muslim, immigrants, etc. Those social conservative strategies would directly harm them.', ">>{4CommunityJustice} : Republicans are struggling for young voters because WE are the majority of the young. POC and other marginalized groups ARE the political majority of the youth. WE are NOT going to join the old white power structure embodied by the GOP and WE are NOT going to join the new reactionary Trump group peopled by the old right and the blue dogs who disgracefully defected in order to save some of their privileged status. Young POC and other marginalized groups are NOT here to be pandered to. WE have OUR coalition within the democratic party and THAT is the future for OUR nation. The republican party and the white power system is being swept away by our peaceful democratic take-over. Demographically the white majority is less than two decades from dispersing. Already we have more than enough white allies to ensure that the white power structure's fate is sealed. OUR message of restitution and redress to the history of marginalization and oppression by the system of white majoritarian rule is the reason that millennials flock to OUR standard in the democratic coalition. White or marginalized, they realize OUR moral standards are the highest and OUR justice is THE justice for this generation. WE are righting wrongs, leveling playing fields, and bringing DOWN oppressive systems in the name of the voiceless. Young people are with US. They are against EVERYTHING represented by the old white majoritarian paradigm. Rigid social norams are foreign to them. Capitalist greed and excess that destroys the heart and soul of a multifaceted and diverse society are disgusting to them. Xenophobic hatred that divides people along arbitrary lines of nationhood, religion, and color are NOT understood by them as valid. OUR coalition to bring down those antique white notions of justice are the future. Demographics ensure OUR voices will take power. THEY will be with us.", ">>{MontyAtWork} : Wow, I'm glad that everything is so black and white and everyone just falls into these little pre-determined categories and time tables which completely negate technological and social changes (i.e. smart phones and the internet). We'll all be republicans soon enough, then we'll see just how right Trump was!", '>>{preposte} : My wife is a Muslim immigrant, so yes, it would be.', ">>{ivsciguy} : They were certainly made a part of the party platform and Trump's VP is pretty much THE social conservative.", ">>{0sigma} : That's a tent that could burn down and make the world a better place.", '>>{InFearn0} : > **RACHEL HOFF:** The folks that would still like to deny same-sex marriage are over-represented in the party’s platform committee, and in some ways that committee is actually out of step with the party as a whole. > **But it won’t be long before a majority of the Republican Party as a whole supports marriage equality.** This reads like a journal entry of someone with Stockholm Syndrome.', ">>{USEDGUACBOWLMERCHANT} : It is true that Millennials are fervently against social conservatism. But Islam, is social conservatism on fucking steroids and Millennials will die to protect that religion. It just doesn't make sense.", '>>{chris41336} : As a "POC" (stupid term), you don\'t speak for me. Get over your hatred of white people. We all bleed red, and souls don\'t come in different colors. The vision you have is for a divided world, where people focus more on their differences than their common humanity. That isn\'t the future I want for my children. I want to most past the race paradigm, not dig us deeper into it by claiming that evil white people are destroying the world.', ">>{chris41336} : It's true though. Most Republicans I know could care less about gay marriage, up to and including Trump. If there is one good think Trump has done, it has been the taming of the evangelical right to be a smaller factor in the party as opposed to the primary one. Don't let all of the GOd talk at the convention fool you, the Evangelicals have far, far less say in a Trump administration than they would have in any of the other GOP candidates.", '>>{chris41336} : Trump picked Pence to shore up the conservative base. Trump is not socially conservative himself, so he needed that.', ">>{InFearn0} : You are conflating protecting religion with protecting theocracy. Freedom of Religion means all Religions are tolerated as long as they don't break laws. Separation of Church and State means opposing theocracies. Be it Sharia Law or the [American Taliban](http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/American_Taliban).", ">>{the_glutton} : Trump's race was far more competitive for far longer than anyone else in recent memory. His campaign really stretched into May, which ensured people were going to turn out heavily. In context it's not terribly impressive.", '>>{chris41336} : I am a young person (and a mixed-race PoC) and what you say is absolutely true, I grew up with all of those things. I still will not be voting for Hillary, because my vision of the future for my children growing up like me - a vision of POST-RACIAL AMERICA, not a vision of super-racial America that the current Democrats wants. Bill Clinton said it best: "I believe that in ways large and small, peaceful and sometimes violent, that the biggest threat to the future of our children and grandchildren is the poison of identity politics that preaches that our differences are far more important than our common humanity." What happened to that perspective? Why must ending inequality somehow include pushing people apart instead of bringing us together, as Americans? Democrats talk a good game, but they don\'t mean what they say, otherwise "All Lives Matter" would not be seen as a racist term now and areas that are Democrat-run would be much better for minorities than they are.', ">>{the_glutton} : Millenial here. I left the Republican party because I couldn't support a party that turned friends of mine who are gay into second class citizens.", ">>{donglol} : All of that I bought before Pence and the RNC convention. Plenty of evangelical shit front and center. Trump himself may not buy into it, but he sure as shit isn't letting it die out.", ">>{chris41336} : That is what Trump does though. He puts on a show for them to make them feel important. That is all those crazy bastards want is to be made to feel important. When it comes to brass tacks, Trump is the decision maker, and as seen by his personal life, he certainly isn't a bible thumper. The evangelical influence won't disappear overnight, it will take time. Trump uprooting the party is step one. I wouldn't be surprised if this was the last RNC where we had to deal with this nonsense in full force.", ">>{InFearn0} : It doesn't matter what the majority believe. It matters what the platform committee members believe. The people that get onto the platform committee are those that are hardcore political activists. Which means they are more representative of the base, than the party as a whole. When Hoff asked for softer language, she was immediately attacked and accused of trying to use the term bigot to shut down opposition, despite not using the term. **The attacking delegate was cheered!** When bullies are cheered, dissent is suppressed. There is only one reason a LGBT person would be a Republican: They like tax cuts more than they like being treated politely (not nicely, just politely). They don't have to go to conventions to get those tax cuts, they just have to vote in the general election. So why would they?", ">>{chris41336} : As a Northeastern Republican, don't let those crazy people in the midwest and south fool you. They used to be Democrats, now they are Republicans - they will always leech of of one of the parties. But not all GOP are like that. Hell, I am an atheist. I just sit there and cringe through the bible-ey stuff.", '>>{chris41336} : That is true, but you change the platform committee by changing the majority. These parties are slow to change their internal infrastructure, but you are going to see it start happening now. These Committee People are likely "Old School" Evangelical GOP as they have traditionally been the most active. Ted Cruz-types.', '>>{InFearn0} : [63% of Democrats are Christian of some denomination](http://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/party-affiliation/democratlean-dem/)', '>>{ivsciguy} : I haven\'t seen any actions by Republicans that would bring anyone together. A couple of my good friends are Muslim and the GOP is straight up attacking them. In my state and many others the GOP is trying to make it harder and harder to vote in ways that disproportionately effect minorities. From everything I have seen the Democrats are trying to make people actually have equal rights, while the GOP is arguing that it is just identity politics. There is no clearer example than gay marriage and gay rights. The right is trying to keep a whole group of people from having equal rights, dividing them from others. At the same time they are claiming that gay people pushing to have equal rights is actually discrimination against conservatives and Christianity. No one thinks the actual statement "All Lives Matter" is racist, the problem is that many racists started pushing it just to attack Black Lives Matter. It is kind of like the term "America First." Most don\'t really have a problem with the sentiment, but if you look at the history of the phrase it was used as a xenophobic slogan against Jews.', '>>{Overly_Triggered} : And because due to things like the Southern Strategy, they tied their social conservative values to issues about the economy and personal liberties. So everything in their agenda is tainted.', '>>{nonades} : This might have something to do with it: https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/4ty4w7/steve_king_defends_comments_questioning_nonwhite/', ">>{USEDGUACBOWLMERCHANT} : keep spinning, keep pretending liberals don't hate Christians.", '>>{Overly_Triggered} : > a vision of super-racial America that the current Democrats wants. As another minority, I\'m going to need a valid source on that. The only places I hear that sort of rhetoric is Reddit and conservative attack ads. >otherwise "All Lives Matter" would not be seen as a racist term now. It\'s an unnecessary term that belittles the conversation. If conservatives really thought "all lives matter" is inclusive enough why are so many in favor of pushing the "blue lives matter" narrative? You can argue that it\'s due to targeted shootings against cops that have taken place recently. While someone would be technically right in saying that "blue" isn\'t inclusive of all lives, I\'m sure you could understand why the timing and argument would be inappropriate.', '>>{chris41336} : I know plenty of Democrats who also "dislike" Muslims for whatever reason, Bill Maher being a very popular one. That isn\'t just a GOP phenomenon. When I say "tear people apart", I mean by hyphenating everyone. I was mixed race so I never got to hyphenate my Americanism. I was just American. I couldn\'t choose between my white or hispanic side or my family. I loved all of them. What Democrats want is to divide people up into categories of people that they can pander to. Wanting true civil rights is not the same as wanting to tell people they are oppressed to extract votes. The GOP isn\'t perfect (at all), but the Democrat strategy is not helpful and they are so on their high horse that they refuse to change. On the national level, the things they say sound great, but putting their policies into play on the local level can have very disastrous consequences.', '>>{chris41336} : I don\'t like the Blue Lives Matter narrative, I agree with you. That is equally divisive and unnecessary, and I have told people that. For super-racial America, just look at what is going on. Race relations are at an all time low. In the late 90\'s/early 2000\'s, they were much better and it was because there was no emphasis on all of this "oppression" nonsense. Things were getting better organically. (Source: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/19/race-relations-reach-all-time-low-under-obama-poll/) On the Hispanic side of my family, the people who have succeeded are those who took advantage of what American society offered, not took advantage of their government or felt "oppressed" by another race or something. My uncle started a distribution company from Elizabeth, NJ and was able to pass that down to his children. He didn\'t expect anything from anyone, and had no education. He didn\'t complain about "white privilege", he just...worked hard and carved a life for himself. We need people in power who cater to THAT mentality, of entrepreneurship and working hard to get ahead.', ">>{Overly_Triggered} : Let's not make it all about social issues. Plenty of young people think pre-k and college are important. Many of them think minimum wage should at least somewhat keep up with inflation. They think the environment should be protected. They believe in climate change. They're fans of renewable energy. They think everyone should have healthcare. There are a lot of very basic issues that millennials care about which Republicans seem diametrically opposed to.", ">>{the_glutton} : I'm in the midwest. I had to leave.", ">>{Overly_Triggered} : > up to and including Trump. He really fucked that up with his VP pick. >taming of the evangelical right He did the opposite. He fired them up with baseless rhetoric. Let's not forget that Trump is the great businessman that was willing to hurt his own bottom line because of how passionate he was over Starbucks and their war on Christmas. The guy was willing to boycott them over their cup designs. >Evangelicals have far, far less say in a Trump administration He basically let them write the party platform. The latest stories show that he will basically have Pence do most of the work for him. If anything, they have more say now since Trump is more of a hands off type of boss.", '>>{Overly_Triggered} : I know a lot of people who aren\'t "hyped" about Hillary but are still gladly voting for her. This is politics. She\'s boring and a hard worker. That\'s why many people like her. Not everyone votes based on a cult of personality. And beyond that, there are a lot of young Republicans who are hyped up against Trump.', ">>{Overly_Triggered} : I've known plenty of people who have turned more liberal as they've grown older.", ">>{Overly_Triggered} : Of course they do. They tolerate it far more than Islam. It's just a bit rich when all these anti-gay, anti-women, anti-science Christians start claiming that their religion is right because Islam is worse.", '>>{sircool099} : ~~young people~~ rich white millennials*', ">>{BoSnowKnows} : The Democrats are a big part of that old white power structure as well. Don't be fooled.", ">>{MerryMacattack} : They're idiots. Social conservatism needs to die real quick if Republicans want a chance to start winning.", ">>{MerryMacattack} : This /r/politics has some sort of hard on for Cruz because he won't endorse Trump, and they just forget that this man ACTUALLY is homophobic and actually WOULD LET his Christian beliefs dictate how he acts as president.", '>>{MerryMacattack} : He also had to face off against a shit ton of other Republicans, with the entire Republican machine gunning against him the whole time. He is definitely an outlier.', '>>{chris41336} : Yes, it is blowing my mind the praise for a man who if had all the power in the world would put gays in conversion camps and put a bible in every classroom.', ">>{MerryMacattack} : They're educated, but not experienced. Not to mention that their education came from college campuses which almost always lean left and are more likely to implement a liberal bias in their teachings.", '>>{J_WalterWeatherman_} : > Don\'t let all of the GOd talk at the convention fool you, the Evangelicals have far, far less say in a Trump administration than they would have in any of the other GOP candidates. It amazes (and depresses) me how successfully Donald has been able to use his inconsistencies to cause each Republican to see in him whatever it is they want to see in a candidate. To Republicans that are anti-gay marriage, his selection of Pence and his list of Supreme Court pics signals that he will be a hard line religious conservative and will take rights away from gays. To Republicans that are pro-gay marriage, his former statements in support of gays (most of which also happen to be from a time period when he wanted to enact the biggest tax hike in history exclusively on the "super wealthy", was pro-choice and wanted universal healthcare) signal that he will protect gay rights, in spite of all his actions to the contrary in the current election. The truth is none of us know at all what Donald will do, because he has virtually no concrete policy positions, and the ones he does have are constantly changing.', ">>{J_WalterWeatherman_} : > That is what Trump does though. He puts on a show for them to make them feel important. How do you know that you aren't the one that the show is being put on for?", '>>{JohnnyBravados} : I agree but I see those as social issues. The anti-science agenda is an effect of the ultra-religious social conservatives having disproportionate power in that party to shape policy. Climate change? Obviously a secular conspiracy. Evolution? Just a politically correct attack on faith. Science is not important to people who see science as a threat to their ideology.', '>>{ivsciguy} : Over 2/3s of the party *are* Christians. They might not be your favorite brand of Christian, but they are believers.', '>>{ivsciguy} : I have been paying taxes for 14 years, and I have been paying a lot of taxes in a "real job" for almost 6 years. Has not had any effect at all on my views on social issues. Also, I live in a state with some of the lowest taxes in the country and it causing our state government, schools, infrastructure to fall apart. I would would be fine with paying the higher taxes my state had several years ago if it fixed such things.', ">>{ihavesensitiveknees} : I'm in my mid-30's. Out of probably 100 friends and family members under 40 that I know, there are probably about 3-4 Trump supporters.", ">>{SCarolinaSoccerNut} : There's no evidence apart from anecdotal that universities make their students more liberal. In fact studies usually find that students leave their university education with the same political leanings as they had when they started. The political leanings of university faculty tend to depend on the discipline. Professors in the humanities and most social sciences tend to be liberal. Professors in economics, business fields, and the applied sciences tend to be conservative/libertarian. Professors in the natural sciences tend to be apolitical, supporting whichever political party seems to be more pro-science at the time.", '>>{x86_64Ubuntu} : >...I mean by hyphenating everyone. I was mixed race so I never got to hyphenate my Americanism Ah yes, the old "it\'s their fault they are treated differently by the system because they *hyphenate* their groups".', '>>{alpha_dk} : If and when they "become new republicans", it will be after the republican party stops opposing the things they want. It won\'t just happen without movement. That said, in 10 years no one will be seriously talking about the culture wars we\'re fighting today, and yeah, once that happens some (Ds) will move (R).', ">>{ianandris} : By that same token, we also need people in power who recognize that hard work and success aren't always correlated. The hardest working people I've known in my life are poor. They have to work hard because the alternative is complete ruin. When an entire wing of the political system in the US is opposed to things like a minimum wage, public services that aren't the military, and unions in general, but simultaneously preaches the virtue of hard work, it's pretty easy to get the sense that that wing is focused on nothing more than what it can extract from people. I want a government that makes my life easier, not harder. I don't want to be lectured by old men who started out with with advantages I could never dream of on how to better a situation they can't possibly understand. I agree completely in the value of hard work. I just don't think most people are as lazy and when we talk about how to help them I don't think it's talking about enabling them or breeding dependency on government programs.", '>>{Crocoduck_The_Great} : > I know plenty of Democrats who also "dislike" Muslims for whatever reason, Bill Maher being a very popular one. That isn\'t just a GOP phenomenon. You can dislike a group and not want to persecute them.', ">>{sircool099} : those that go into the work force, primarily. dem's typically keep those that stay in college for far too long.", ">>{Crocoduck_The_Great} : His results are actually pretty in line with Bush's 2000 results, which was the most recent election that closely mirrors this one, an election coming off a Dem president with no incumbent. 2004 there was an uncontested primary, so of course it has low turnout. Also, why didn't you include 2012s 10,031,336 votes from Romney?", ">>{Crocoduck_The_Great} : > souls don't come in different colors. Or exist.", ">>{Crocoduck_The_Great} : Ah yes, the evils of learning things. But really, do you have any actual data to back that up? I've never seen anything that show republicans leading among *any* young demographics. If you know of polls/studies/data that actually back up your claim, I'm genuinely interested.", '>>{sircool099} : I really don\'t want to say "google is your friend" on these matters, but sadly I never save any of the reports or things that I see to support the statement to use later. Just goes over my head really. Best I can do atm: http://www.rollcall.com/news/home/millennials-more-and-more-a-swing-group-survey-says Also, learning useless knowledge is worse than knowing nothing at all.', '>>{straighttalk2016} : >For super-racial America, just look at what is going on. Race relations are at an all time low. In the late 90\'s/early 2000\'s, they were much better and it was because there was no emphasis on all of this "oppression" nonsense. Things were getting better organically. That\'s like saying things were better for trans people in the 90s because there was no emphasis on all of this "bathroom" nonsense. Just because certain people aren\'t talking about a problem doesn\'t mean it doesn\'t exist. For decades black and brown people have been abused and murdered by the police, including during your golden age of the late 90s/early 2000s. For decades black and brown people have been systemically discriminated against in matters of housing, education, the criminal justice system, healthcare, employment, etc. It has not gotten appreciably better organically for a large amount of people, and these people are suffering as a result. Let\'s look at just one aspect of employment, for example. Look at this article on a Princeton study on hiring bias in New York City: [https://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S11/23/70K64/index.xml?section=newsreleases](https://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S11/23/70K64/index.xml?section=newsreleases). It found, among other things that "Even without criminal records, however, black applicants had low rates of positive responses, about the same as the response rate for white applicants with criminal records. Hispanics also faced discrimination by employers, but were preferred relative to blacks." Do you not see a problem with that? Of course many individuals, like your uncle, succeed despite the odds all the time, and I\'m not saying that anyone should sit around and feel sorry for themselves. But to deny that there is a serious race problem in America is to deny reality.', '>>{chris41336} : I would argue that 90% of the discrimination you are citing against brown people, of which I am one, is financial rather than racial. Most "brown" people do not have the financial means that white people due, and that is primarily due to the fact that white people have been in the system longer. I saw it in my own family. My white side did have privilige, but it wasn\'t because of some conspiracy to keep brown people down. It was because over three generations of being in this country they had established a financial support infrastructure to have a parachute for each other. Investments and all that. The minority side of my family didn\'t and doesn\'t have that. They got here, had no credit, no investments from older folks, nothing. They had to forge ahead like my Irish relatives did generations ago, just now instead of years ago. As for murdered by police, see this study from Harvard published a week or so ago. Shootings have not been measurable more for blacks than whites (though overall violence seems to be): http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/12/upshot/surprising-new-evidence-shows-bias-in-police-use-of-force-but-not-in-shootings.html?_r=0 The exception to the above is African Americans who, because of two centuries of actual legislative discrimination, really DIDN\'T have a means to succeed in much of this country. That is unique to Hispanics arriving now. I have seen with my own eyes how hard it is to escape from even one generation of poverty, I can only imagine it compounds after several. That being said, my point about the "golden age" i listed above is that people were coming together racially. The "old racism" was almost dead (as in people who felt that way had to hide it, and fewer and fewer people felt that way), and vestiges of institutional racism would slowly die with it. Now, "old racism" (with people claiming racial superiority) is on an upswing, and it is frightening and unhelpful to anything. EDIT: For your Trans example, I would argue that nobody caring about what bathroom Trans people use is preferable to suddenly everybody caring, yes. But I sense that is the crux of our issue here. My view of progress is nobody caring, yours is everyone caring, and we will never resolve that difference. I only have one Trans friend, but they claim it was far easier back before any attention was put on all of this nonsense because of Charlotte deciding to make some misguided stand which lead to North Caroline doing the opposite and angering everyone. EDIT 2: Also, you say my uncle was an exception, and I agree. But success in the United States has ALWAYS been an exception, even among white people, since the beginning of this country. It isn\'t like every white person is successful and every minority isn\'t.', '>>{ivsciguy} : How long is too long? Cause I finished a five year program in four and turned all liberal...', ">>{NobodyLikesHipsters} : Further proof that Hillary Clinton is a Republican, right? Cause she can't seem to get the millenial vote either for practically the same reasons.", ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : As a millennial Trump supporter, I look around at my peers and I look at what they post on social media, and I see very, very few similarities with myself. We're in very different worlds. I'm a Trump supporter and they're constantly posting anti-Trump content, pro illegal immigration content, pro censorship of free speech content, content about white privilege, content about islamophobia, etc. None of them know that I support Trump, and I would likely be met with extreme vitrol and hatred by many if they knew. I'm very much in the Trump closet. Interestingly, all of my peers who post anti-Trump things all the time - they're constantly posting anti-Hillary things too. They pretty much all started as Bernie supporters. I have no idea what they'll do this election. I imagine that a few actually do support Trump but keep that fact hidden.", ">>{carlclashfan} : A shit ton of other Republicans who spent far more time attacking each other than him, as they assumed he'd fall flat on his ass and didn't want to alienate his supporters.", '>>{toolazyforaname} : To be fair, Bill Maher hates all religions equally.', ">>{Crocoduck_The_Great} : I did google for it and found nothing, which is why I asked the person making the claim for a source. And even the source you provided doesn't back up your claim that working young favor the republicans while college youth favor democrats. If anything, it implies the opposite since it said white youth are more likely to favor republicans than minority youth and white youth are also more likely to go to college.", '>>{neweraccount123} : >WE are NOT going to join the old white power structure Bahahahahhahhaahhahhahahahaaaaa', '>>{ihavesensitiveknees} : More like most of the people I know are educated, unlike the average Trump voter.', ">>{straighttalk2016} : How did you arrive at the conclusion that 90% of discrimination against brown people is financial rather than racial? That's wild speculation, and is ultimately meaningless. And if you honestly believe racism was dying out in that golden age, I have a bridge to sell you. Do you really think people are being racist now because it's popular? Do you believe that the racists now weren't racist before the Obama era? If so, I can only conclude that you were ignorant of what was really going on in that time period. I'm only guessing, but were you a child at this point in history (the aforementioned golden age)? My sense of progress is simply that everyone be treated equitably. Don't be obtuse. I mean that minority business owners and professionals face obstacles that white business owners don't, solely because of race. Everyone faces the usual obstacles to success, but the color of one's skin can contribute to additional obstacles.", '>>{chris41336} : If you really think that Minority Business Owners face different hurdles from everyone else, you live in a different reality from every minority business owner. Owning a business is hard no matter who you are. Nobody has ever hindered my family from doing anything in the business world because they are hispanic.', ">>{straighttalk2016} : Well there you have it. Open and shut case. It didn't happen to your family, so clearly it has never happened to anyone ever. Brilliant response, chris41336."], ['>>{PersianKing} : Is a portable battery bad for iPhone battery health?', ">>{vakenT} : Is charging you're phone bad for you're battery? Because afaik it's the same thing, just this comes from a portable power source and now a wall socket.", '>>{Lysergh} : Electricity from a wall socket goes through an iPhone/iPad charger and is converted to correct voltage. Electricity from a portable battery goes directly from the battery.', ">>{PersianKing} : It's the same premise as using a fake apple cable, it's not designed for apple products and might cause surges and damage the internal battery.", ">>{vakenT} : I get it, thought it wouldn't be a problem, you're probably right. Sorry for misleading you, OP.", '>>{sglville} : There is no way a 50000mah battery is $9.59. Get a reputable brand like Anker if you are concerned.', '>>{AlienAndTroll} : There is a review: It is a big lie... 50000mAh should give you around 15-20 full carges.... This will give you 2 if lucky', '>>{sglville} : Its probably a 5,000mah not a 50,000. I have a 10,000mah Anker and I get about 3 full charges on my 6S Plus', ">>{Bryman85} : But since it uses USB to connect it provides the agreed standard of ~5 volts output that your Apple charger does. The amperage difference won't hurt it because that is just the max that a device can pull while charging.", '>>{IEatPizza} : Sounds about right, I also have a 10000 battery, barely use it but I always carry it daily']]

classify and reply

['>>{david_walls} : Dobot M1: the affordable desktop robot arm that 3D prints, laser-engraves, solders, and more', '>>{sirbabylon} : Anyone who wants this I say go for it, but please understand that one of the main tenets of 3D printing is that if you fund a kickstarter 3D printer then you are paying to debug the product. That might not be a deal breaker but please keep this in mind.', ">>{popdisaster00} : 'Obscene' inequality: Oxfam says 8 men as rich as half the world", '>>{WienerNuggetLog} : Opportunist anti-Semitic clown that will do anything to raise her profile', ">>{LatinGeek} : I'm not sure if I can trust a 3D printing head mounted on a swinging arm, connected to another swinging arm, connected to a linear, vertical motor. But I guess the fact it's a proper manufactured thing and not a Prusa makes the tolerances tighter.", ">>{ienfull} : > Oxfam used Forbes' billionaires list that was last published in March 2016 to make its headline claim. According to the Forbes list, Microsoft founder Gates is the richest individual with a net worth of $75 billion. The others, in order of ranking, are Amancio Ortega, the Spanish founder of fashion house Inditex, financier Warren Buffett, Mexican business magnate Carlos Slim Helu, Amazon boss Jeff Bezos, Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg, Oracle's Larry Ellison and Bloomberg, the former mayor of New York. Three of these people are Jewish. What is Oxfam trying to say here, exactly? That successful Jews should have their money redistributed? The Nazis did that.", ">>{maglevwholphin} : You and Ivanka together in the cockpit of a Mechva MK89-D, chaingun and railgums glowing white hot as the sun sets over a bloodied Jerusalem sky. The last enemy slain, both unsure if any other survivors remain on either side. You look into one another's eyes, knowing, now is the time. And commence, solemnly, in perpetuating the survival of our very species.", '>>{Shanemaier} : I feel like I owe you a fee for all of this legal advice', '>>{postmoderncoyote} : Doesn\'t the "and she knows it" implicate her at all?', '>>{Schiffy94} : A tool who was too chicken shit to ditch her father\'s campaign trail after the "sheriff\'s star" fiasco.', '>>{lilbabymudpies} : Thank you, Space Star Ordering! [Source](https://youtu.be/1ibSaHM_LbM)', '>>{AcerRubrum} : Theyre also all gigantic benefactors to charities and have pledged to give their fortunes away when they die.', '>>{Departugal} : Wasserman Schultz to Sanders: ‘We Are Already A Grassroots Party’', '>>{bostonscollege} : This is interesting (and pretty disheartening), but I think regular Americans forget just how much better off *they* are when compared to the rest of the world. The Economist [published an article](http://www.economist.com/news/business-and-finance/21710771-new-analysis-how-worlds-wealth-distributed-you-may-be-higher-up) in November about global wealth distribution, with the following findings (they define wealth as the sum of your bank deposits, financial investments and property holdings minus your debts): * If your life is worth $2,220, you\'re in the global top 50% * If your life is worth $71,560, you\'re in the global top 10% * If your life is worth $744,400, you\'re in the global top 1% The subtitle of the article is "the one per center next door," and it closes with the following remark: >Some of those railing against the global elite probably do not know they belong to it. We\'re very quick to scrutinize the richest of the rich (and sometimes rightfully so), but I think it\'s worth it to at least gain some perspective of how well we all do when compared to the rest of the world. The vast majority of us are very fortunate to live like kings, and I think for this we should be most appreciative.', ">>{SarcasticallyAShill} : Now imagine that half of the world, 375 million people storming each of those 8 estates. This is what I don't get about obscene wealth, I'd always be worried about the rabble dragging me out of bed at night and throwing me against a wall.", ">>{Jeb-ExclamationPoint} : Wait you just said WHAT about Ivanka? This isn't okay. No.", ">>{_tx} : I've never dealt with the FBI, but I'd imagine they know what they are doing. The SEC definately does that.", ">>{AlisherUsmanov} : Here's my perception of the truth. Clinton is defensive, and understandably so. She has been after facing an unusual amount of attacks at her politically for an abnormal amount of time. Any smart republican strategist could see that she was always a candidate for president, even when Bill was in office. Now, partly because of this defensiveness, and partly for convenience, she set up a server in her home. She was only really comfortable using the email on her blackberry, and didnt know all that much about how everything worked. She likely had some notion that it wasnt completely okay, but like many policies, you do what you can get away with. Benghazi was another example of faux republican outrage, and then they found this. This investigation came from the wrong intentions. She was right to be defensive. She likely had no understanding of what sort of information could have been hacked from her server, and she also probably assumed in the most rose tinted of glasses that all of her emails to or from others would be preserved on their server side records. She knows she fucked up, and has been playing stall ball and while admitting it was wrong, does not want to admit to everything. She doesnt because she is defensive. She knows what republicans can do to this sort of information. She has seen it first hand. She truly believes in serving the country and doesnt want someone like Trump to be president. Thats what I believe the reality is. Id put money on it.", ">>{830hobbes} : My lab has a $500,000 professional level 3D printer that we're paying to debug... The thing is awful.", ">>{solarplex} : Wait until it's actually out. Kickstarters look like the creators just keep pouring in more and more money that would be used for production and shipping into making their prototypes a little bit better.", ">>{pwomptastic} : Pretty sure they do worry about this. That's why they make sure we focus on hating each-other instead of them.", '>>{orezinlv} : And somehow they "earned" it. Uhuh.', ">>{AleppoMoment} : Hey, I'm not the judge of you but I was always taught that if I don't have anything nice to say I should keep my mouth shut ever thought of that?", '>>{maglevwholphin} : I-... Ivanka.. "Yes."', ">>{Kierkegaardensalad} : All I've got for this one is a big fat bucket of *lol.*", ">>{Bujidou} : Isn't telling a whole race of people what to think about someone kind of fucked up?", ">>{suspendedbeliever} : Has potential but I've never been convinced by 'do everything' machines. I would far prefer it based around an x, y traditional 3d printer base and just give me laser, router and printer. Will never back anything like this in KS. The product nearly always ends up being lacklustre or non existent.", ">>{Chronic_Apathy1} : For what it's worth, several of those 8 men have donated millions and millions of dollars to various charities around the world and have pledged to donate billions more.", ">>{MWM2} : > Hey, I'm not the judge of you but... Did you steal that from a stand-up comic?", ">>{MWM2} : I bet mentally younger and he's a t_d denizen.", '>>{DamagedHells} : I can remember if I ever fucking testified on something. Are you kidding me?', ">>{MWM2} : 1\\. You're talking to yourself. 2\\. *We can hear you.*", ">>{SarcasticallyAShill} : I'm just saying, that's the numbers we're talking about here.", ">>{MWM2} : I read the first two paragraphs... > The biblical story of Esther is an imperfect allegory for the Trump family, but as for Ivanka, the comparison isn't half bad.* Esther is a Jewish woman who conceals her identity when she becomes the bride of a powerful king. It is only when she reveals who she is that she can save the Jewish people from an evil adviser plotting their destruction. > > Like Esther, Ivanka might appear to be nothing more than a pretty face until she shows that she's the savviest person in the room. Like Esther, Ivanka has a familial, almost accidental position of influence with a powerful gentile political figure. And like Esther, Ivanka's Jewishness is veiled: Something she describes as an important part of her identity and family life—she's an Orthodox convert, but she rarely agrees to talk about her faith—is essentially invisible to those who don't know it's there. ...and I stopped there. Ivanka is probably just like everybody else in Trump's inner circle: greedy, unethical, immoral and possibly evil. **Name me a single exception.** Esther-like she is not.", '>>{AlisherUsmanov} : I think you are missing it. She knows its silly that she cant use the blackberry, just how its silly that my grandma doesnt know how to clear the microwave timer, and that shit always says 17 seconds.', ">>{Raininazus} : If not, don't look for expensive things and get some money.", '>>{yobsmezn} : That is the fallacy of relative privation in action there: " dismissing an argument or complaint due to the existence of more important problems in the world, regardless of whether those problems bear relevance to the initial argument." (wikipedia)', '>>{pizzashill} : >> the middle of the 1700s, as the gap between rich and poor widened, as violence and the threat of violence increased, the problem of control became more serious. What if these different despised groups-the Indians, the slaves, the poor whites-should combine? Even before diere were so many blacks, in the seventeenth century, there was, as Abbot Smith puts it, "a lively fear that servants would join with Negroes or Indians to overcome the small number of masters." >> There was little chance that whites and Indians would combine in North America as they were doing in South and Central America, where the shortage of women, and the use of Indians on the plantations, led to daily contact. Only in Georgia and South Carolina, where white women were scarce, was there some sexual mixing of white men and Indian women. In general, the Indian had been pushed out of sight, out of touch. One fact disturbed: whites would run off to join Indian tribes, or would be captured in battle and brought up among the Indians, and when this happened the whites, given a chance to leave, chose to stay in the Indian culture, Indians, having the choice, almost never decided to join the whites. Hector St. Jean Crevecoeur, the Frenchman who lived in America for almost twenty years, told, in Letters from an American Farmer, how children captured during the Seven Years\' War and found by their parents, grown up and living with Indians, would refuse to leave their new families. >> "There must be in their social bond," he said, "something singularly captivating, and far superior to anything to be boasted among us; for thousands of Europeans are Indians, and we have no examples of even one of those Aborigines having from choice become Europeans." >> But this affected few people. In general, the Indian was kept at a distance. And the colonial officialdom had found a way of alleviating the danger: by monopolizing the good land on the eastern seaboard, they forced landless whites to move westward to the frontier, there to encounter the Indians and to be a buffer for the seaboard rich against Indian troubles, white becoming more dependent on the government for protection. Bacon\'s Rebellion was instructive: to conciliate a diminishing Indian population at the expense of infuriating a coalition of white frontiersmen was very risky. Better to make war on the Indian, gain the support of the white, divert possible class conflict by turning poor whites against Indians for the security of the elite. >> Might blacks and Indians combine against the white enemy? In the northern colonies (except on Cape Cod, Martha\'s Vineyard, and Rhode Island, where there was close contact and sexual mixing), there was not much opportunity for Africans and Indians to meet in large numbers. New York had the largest slave population in the North, and there was some contact between blacks and Indians, as in 1712 when Africans and Indians joined in an insurrection. But this was quickly suppressed. In the Carolinas, however, whites were outnumbered by black slaves and nearby Indian tribes; in the 1750s, 25,000 whites faced 40,000 black slaves, with 60,000 Creek, Cherokee, Choctaw, and Chickasaw Indians in the area. Gary Nash writes: "Indian uprisings that punctuated the colonial period and a succession of slave uprisings and insurrectionary plots that were nipped in the bud kept South Carolinians sickeningly aware that only through the greatest vigilance and through policies designed to keep their enemies divided could they hope to remain in control of the situation." >> Edmund Morgan, on the basis of his careful study of slavery in Virginia, sees racism not as "natural" to black-white difference, but something coming out of class scorn, a realistic device for control. "If freemen with disappointed hopes should make common cause with slaves of desperate hope, the results might be worse than anything Bacon had done. The answer to the problem, obvious if unspoken and only gradually recognized, was racism, to separate dangerous free whites from dangerous black slaves by a screen of racial contempt." >> There was still another control which became handy as the colonies grew, and which had crucial consequences for the continued rule of the elite throughout American history. Along with the very rich and the very poor, there developed a white middle class of small planters, independent farmers, city artisans, who, given small rewards for joining forces with merchants and planters, would be a solid buffer against black slaves, frontier Indians, and very poor whites. The growing cities generated more skilled workers, and the governments cultivated the support of white mechanics by protecting them from the competition of both slaves and free Negroes. >> As early as 1686, the council in New York ordered that "noe Negro or Slave be suffered to work on the bridge as a Porter about any goods either imported or Exported from or into this City." In the southern towns too, white craftsmen and traders were protected from Negro competition. In 1764 the South Carolina legislature prohibited Charleston masters from employing Negroes or other slaves as mechanics or in handicraft trades. Middle-class Americans might be invited to join a new elite by attacks against the corruption of the established rich. The New Yorker Cadwallader Golden, in his Address to the Freeholders in 1747, attacked the wealthy as tax dodgers unconcerned with the welfare of others (although he himself was wealthy) and spoke for the honesty and dependability of "the midling rank of mankind" in whom citizens could best trust "our liberty & Property." >> This was to become a critically important rhetorical device for the rule of the few, who would speak to the many of "our" liberty, "our" property, "our" country.', ">>{OverWorkedCorpse} : Thats pretty obvious. But unfortunately many people buy above their means even buying stuff they'll never use.", ">>{Potoodles} : I can tell you right now that this platform is poorly optimized (mechanically) for 3d printing. Most 3d printer designs attempt to reduce the amount of mass that moves because the extruder head does a ton of back and forth movements very quickly. We're talking about speeds of 150 mm/s+ or 350 ipm+. I guarantee this thing can't move that fast. Looks good for pick and place though although I cant imagine why the average person would need a one outside a production environment.", ">>{bostonscollege} : I wasn't dismissing the original article; it's just food for thought. Income inequality is a huge issue, which is why I commented with that link to broaden the perspective gained. It's also relevant to the original claim because it expands upon it. Hopefully other people find the information pertinent to the discussion.", ">>{_CtrlAltLeft_} : No they aren't. Those two are the establishment, bought and paid for.", '>>{AlisherUsmanov} : Youre missing the context. Never said he said it. Delaying isnt necessarily not cooperative. Its all a process.', ">>{DamagedHells} : So, what you're saying is that someone has had to testify so many times that they can't remember testifying for something? How in the Hell does that not seem problematic to some of you?", ">>{ArticArny} : Looks like a nightmare of debugging and maintenance just waiting to happen. Wouldn't go anywhere near this until it had been out for at least a year or two. Certainly not while it's in the design phase.", ">>{yeti77} : He's right that they're not, she's right that he should actually join the party if he wants to change it.", '>>{kool-keith} : married a jew, converted to judaism, raises her children as jewish is an anti-semite according to you ...', ">>{slutty_electron} : Just based on the prevalence of new car purchases I'd say almost half of US households have a spare couple grand but they're already spending it on depreciation and interest.", '>>{alisdairejay} : You know, sometimes I really wish we lived in an honor culture where officials felt obliged to commit [seppuku](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seppuku) instead of doubling down on their failure and incompetence.', '>>{AlisherUsmanov} : And if I produced a document that showed that it said "I love you, son, cant wait to see you" then we have problems.', '>>{AlisherUsmanov} : I have been in court so many times I dont remember a lot of them. Would you say going to court is something you would remember. Testifying isnt a big deal to some people, given their professions.', ">>{ricdesi} : Why? They're giving back almost uncountable sums of money to worthy causes. Are you saying that Bill Gates needs to be dragged out of his bed and beaten in the streets?", ">>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : http://www.salon.com/2016/02/13/un_democratic_party_dnc_chair_says_superdelegates_ensure_elites_dont_have_to_run_against_grassroots_activists/ > Unpledged delegates exist really to make sure that party leaders and elected officials don’t have to be in a position where they are running against grassroots activists. She's such a liar.", '>>{spacemonkeey} : >"mercenary lawyers for hire" Kid, they\'ve been on Hillary\'s tale since she first ran for senator. That\'s 16 years ago. http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/AA_HW06_Hillary-FEC-Complaint.pdf I hope this helps you on your way.', ">>{DamagedHells} : I don't believe you've ever been in a courtroom.", '>>{WienerNuggetLog} : Opportunist I said. Will do anything for the money', '>>{Cobaltsaber} : I could see a tech savvy small business owner have use for a few of these. Pay some highschool kid minimum wage to stuff envelopes vs getting a robot to do it all day.', '>>{Dassiell} : The global one percent is also different than the US One percent', ">>{MydniteSon} : So I happen to live in Wasserman Schultz's district. As far as what she has done for us locally as a Representative, I have very few complaints about her. Actually think she does a great job in that respect. As far as anything to do with national reach, I wish I could say the same. She's been a mess there.", ">>{thewholedamnplanet} : Yes, Wall Street always gives millions to grass roots parties because they're nutty like that. Until the DNC changes it will always be GOPlite. 75% less evil is better but still too much.", ">>{tau-lepton} : From the person who just posted >Emotional Hillary Clinton displays a thunderous scowl before clocking cameras and flashing fake smile at inauguration (mirror.co.uk) Do you know the definition of hypocrisy? But I'm not judging you", '>>{olb3} : Why is DWS still affiliated with the party. As a progressive myself, I view her being forced out of the party as one of the fastest ways to unite the party.', ">>{aledlewis} : She's still pushing for unity in 2017, I see.", '>>{Cobaltsaber} : The primary target seems to be small business owners and makers. 1k isn\'t pocket change but it\'s certainly "affordable" for what it is.', ">>{UrukHaiGuyz} : She's the next generation/evolution of Trump. Still the same hypocritical, amoral, money-grubbing hucksters in a prettier, softer package. Kind of like how Donny's no hero for not being an open John Bircher like his father was, Ivanka doesn't deserve praise because she can refrain from openly mocking the disabled, for instance. She's just as shitty a person for supporting and enabling her father's brand of crass hatred. Like the quote in the article says: >[“I think Jews, of all people, should know that when you embrace a xenophobic movement, even if in that moment Jews aren’t on the top of that list, we’re not far behind,” said Savage in an interview. “In the moment, I felt a deep sense that we should know better.”](https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/09/what-should-american-jews-make-of-ivanka-trump/498476/)", '>>{SiegeLion1} : Are Prusas that bad? I was considering getting one', '>>{aledlewis} : Too late, Debs. The top-down overhaul began the minute that she resigned from the DNC in disgrace.', '>>{WienerNuggetLog} : Yeah. Ever heard of going against your interests? Hilljacks in aca plans voting against', '>>{glaurung_} : Unfortunately stuffing envelopes is a lot more complex than pick and place.', ">>{6heismans} : I don't know how Russia managed to get her to go on television to say this live. God those guys are good.", '>>{Dassiell} : The global one percent is also different than the US One percent', '>>{RebornPastafarian} : The two at the top have given billions. Zuckberburg has said he will give away 90% of his wealth.', ">>{TrumpCardStrategy} : Do you use facebook, or windows? how much value do you get out of it? Let's say there were only 10 people in the world each with $10. One of those 10 people makes a product the other 9 value enough to spend $5 on. The inventor now has much more money than everyone else. But at the sametime everyone else is better off because they enjoy the product.", ">>{Verdris} : >The robot can be programmed in a number of ways. You can put it into learning mode and you can grab its head and move it around — the robot records the movements and repeats them until it gets bored. So they've invented a masturbation robot. Baby steps, I guess.", ">>{sundialinshade} : It shouldn't have to come to that, but its clever of you to find a way to work around it.", '>>{Navil_} : Do you talk about the prusa i3 mk2 or the asia chep ones', '>>{dontbeabsurd} : Not really, as long as you are prepared to do some adjustments. The construction itself is quite robust. I think the reference was to the tolerances of the parts.', '>>{kool-keith} : > married a jew, converted to judaism, raises her children as jewish > > > > is an anti-semite according to you ...', '>>{sysadmin001} : Will it jerk me off so I can raid and watch porn at the same time? This is the shit that matters ok, priorities.', ">>{Shanemaier} : Fair enough, in the same sense delaying isn't necessarily cooperative either. I get what your saying though.", '>>{pissbum-emeritus} : > What was written in your birthday card from your mother, 3 years ago? "Don\'t spend it all on booze." Love, Mom', '>>{pissbum-emeritus} : I thought this exchange could use a little friendly humor.', ">>{2IRRC} : It's completely meaningless. That's something a state could do if they had funds. While their wealth allows them to impact one specific issue no matter how well meaning they are it's impossible to impact everyone everywhere with everything. Also the funds they have grow on its own often driving globalization which further enriches them. This compounds the problem nations have of collecting taxes and providing basic services. On one side they might save 300,000 people by helping to fund medical research in Africa. On the other side their wealth comes at a cost of millions of people with an equal number of problems many of which will die as a result. Wealth is unfortunately a means of survival. Their extreme wealth comes at a cost that can be directly tied back to globalization and government created monopolies due to lobbying efforts and corporate practices which are anti-competitive wherever they are. Chief of those is taxes. The lions share of profits these multi-national companies make is through not paying their taxes. The most simple solution to this is forcing them to pay taxes and back taxes. Yes that would mean confiscating their wealth. A wealth that was never theirs to begin with. It was yours and they stole it.", ">>{FrozenSquirrel} : Quit trying to make 'smearfishing' happen. It's not gonna happen.", '>>{remarkless} : Democratic electorate to Wasserman Schultz: "Shut the fuck and go away" Seriously, in the end, she\'s more toxic for the party than HRC.', '>>{anon902503} : God damn, I wish she could just shut the fuck up. All she does is inflame in-party fighting.', ">>{KamalaKHAAAAAAAAAN} : Ah but I'm sure these are the 8 hardest-working people in the entire world. EDIT /s, because our world sucks now.", ">>{SolidKGB} : Actually it's done often by mobsters. That's why wise guys are so tight with their representation.", '>>{Xbajuju} : At least when Shkreli was ordered before congess, he told them ahead of time he was going to plead the fifth, making the whole thing a waste of time and just a smear on him. These people are just taking lines out of hillarys PlayBook.', ">>{KamalaKHAAAAAAAAAN} : Cost of living is a thing, dude. You can't compare a suburb in upstate NY to Somalia.", '>>{theschoolofjarule} : Every time this reptilian shows her face the DNC loses 10,000 votes. Get this sellout train wreck off TV.', '>>{smaugington} : Also this robot costs about $1500. Need atleast 2 to get paper into envelope. 3k or 10/hr for a kid', ">>{BenderRodriguez14} : It's interesting how Debbie hasn't learned to shut her mouth and keep it shut, I hate Trump with a passion but we've got Schultz to thank maybe more than anybody for (and not necessarily for Clinton winning, but for her overall involvement). She's complete political poison at this stage and needs to accept that she's done. As tone deaf as she is though, I won't be holding my breath.", '>>{KamalaKHAAAAAAAAAN} : >But at the sametime everyone else is better off because they enjoy the product. Debatable. Studies show that social media has a pretty bad impact on self-esteem and depression.', '>>{OverWorkedCorpse} : Very true. Its also very good for people who design and build their own products.', ">>{iamtherealdylan} : Prusas are actually pretty widely liked in the 3D printing community. They're sort of like what makerbot was before it went closed source and turned to shit", ">>{Terrific_Soporific} : It's also the second iteration of dobot- and people seem to have a lot of [complaints](https://www.reddit.com/r/shittykickstarters/comments/5h7y7d/the_already_overfunded_dobot_m1_robotic_arm_is/) about the first one- which was also a kickstarter.", '>>{outsider} : Which is odd since the FOIA was something passed under Bill Clinton while she was FLOTUS.', '>>{cool_hand_luke} : They seem to be united in fucking over future generations.', '>>{mannabhai} : You yourself are much more richer than thousands of people in developing countries simply because of where you live. Your standard of living is obscene by their standards. Would you give up your standard of living? Now about your standard of living, it comes about because you live in a free market economy with a rule of law. Poorer countries neither have free markets nor a fair rule of law. Additionally, as an Indian, I make less than the US federal minimum wage but I still live a comfortable life in the most expensive city in India. Purchasing power parity is a thing. Inequality is higher between countries instead of within countries.', '>>{mannabhai} : But this is exactly how they got to that number of 8 people being equally wealthy to 3 billion', '>>{veryfry} : >Inequality is higher between countries instead of within countries. Not really. If you compare the bottom and the very top in a single country the difference is usually higher than if comparing the median wealth in a poor and rich country. (Because the richest are so absurdly rich)', ">>{iCameToLearnSomeCode} : > 3k or 10/hr for a kid This is a simple math problem, if you have a $3,000 envelope stuffer and you need to stuff as many envelopes as possible (like a coupon mailer or something) then it will pay for itself in two weeks. You would need 3 shifts at $10 per hour stuffing envelops constantly 7 days a week to match the productivity of a mail machine (not that these would make a good mail machine but that's beside my point) it would cost $1,680 per week to do the same amount of work, even if your mail machine had to be replaced monthly only an idiot would hire people instead of buying the robot.", ">>{TheTelephone} : It's from Eric Boswell, who was Assistant Secretary of Diplomatic Security.", ">>{imbobbathefett} : That's funny, they tried using that tactic in an intelligence squared debate and they lost the event. Someone being in the global 1% for making 30k a year is not the same as a CEO that makes 10k per day or per hour.", '>>{yoramrod} : She looks nervous and you can see the lump in her throat before she starts talking. This is usually the sign of somebody who is lying. The Republican health bill didn\'t lose because of Democratic "grassroots", it lost because of a divided GOP. Wasserman is the epitome of a big-money, establishment, Democract, and She is one of the primary reasons Trump is president. The media and voter\'s would shun her.', '>>{joshdts} : See you just said Russia, he was just using your words back at you in a circular use of the Russia. Like you said. You.', ">>{FirstToBeDamned} : This to me is basically the tech version of No Man's Sky. Backers be weary.", ">>{DamagedHells} : Haha I haven't had time to read the report yet.", ">>{249ba36000029bbe9749} : I'd like to know if the footage of it in operation are real time or not.", '>>{westbamm} : Not an idiot, but a "nice" person would go for the job creation. But you are right with this simple math.', ">>{Acidics} : Not debatable. If this were true, people wouldn't use it. /close", ">>{LatinGeek} : Prusas are great! If built and calibrated properly they can be some of the most accurate printers out there. That sturdy design, though, is made better by the fact it's a printer with three solid, separate axes. This thing isn't, and building it in the same way you'd build a Prusa would be a nightmare.", '>>{Noctus102} : She also presided over Democrats getting absolutely wiped out in state level races. She was an AWFUL leader.', '>>{onebit} : The original kickstarter looks like it had some problems. http://www.kckstarter.com/projects/dobot/dobot-robotic-arm-for-everyone-arduino-and-open-so/comments From the comments: * Advertised as open source and source never released * Vendor supplied firmware purportedly has issues * Bad support (add an i to the link)', '>>{druuconian} : So does that mean Bernie would have to knife himself for losing the primary?', '>>{le_f} : Trump should film a short re-enactment of this and make a campaign ad.', ">>{ChaoticGoodEconomics} : The expectation that all actors are rational has no bearing on reality. I don't know if this was sarcastic, but you would be wrong if it isn't.", ">>{druuconian} : Because Sanders fans mounted an ineffective primary challenge. Her district likes her, even if some Dems outside of her district don't.", ">>{alpain} : so the one attachment i don't see is some sort of a subtractive CNC/dremel type attachment, since the laser appears to be for engraving and not actually of cutting strength you'd still need that type of a device i think. maybe it cant handle vibrations to keep it steady enough? or maybe they just didnt want to make one?", '>>{sdezigns} : The number of times such revolutionary/violent acts have occurred in history is rather small when compared to day to day relative peace of people just surviving, or even living in subjugation. So I suspect the odds are in favour of the status quo, and the rich staying safe behind their high walls.', '>>{bananaJazzHands} : >lts pretty silly and she knows it. It seriously would take two minutes to train her to use the computer. "Click here, login, click here, type your email, click send."', ">>{AtheismTooStronk} : She said she doesn't remember testifying. I remember every time I went to the principal's office in Kindergarten.", ">>{druuconian} : Nah, but I'm sure Russia is either actively pushing this story and/or is thrilled that others are actively pushing this story. They absolutely tried (and succeeded) to exacerbate disunity on the left.", ">>{Seeker67} : If drugs weren't good for you people wouldn't use them. /close", ">>{workingBen} : You will need to factor in maintenance costs - the thing is going to need to be fixed now and then. You can't have a tech standing around waiting for it to break or malfunction and then pay for 10 minutes of work. You'll also need to consider how you'll get the materials to the envelope stuffing machine, which may involve more machines and a conveyor belt and someone stocking huge loads of supplies into a hopper that drops on the conveyor belt... and now you have at least one person working on loading supplies and a tech and with a hopper / feeder / belt / stuffer setup you have a lot more points of failure. So how many envelopes do you actually need to stuff? Because here's a [$4600 device](http://www.whitakerbrothers.com/formax-6102-folder-inserter) that will do almost 1400 pieces in an hour. Quick Googling found several others in the couple hundred range that operate at much lower speeds.", ">>{SiegeLion1} : Thats good to hear, I was a bit sceptical with how cheap they were when most 3d printers I've seen people talk about are like £1000+ I know they're not fantastic out of the box, they need a few aftermarket upgrades to make them really good but it's still cheaper than most others.", ">>{druuconian} : Bernie fans don't really have room to talk about party affiliation until and unless Bernie joins the party he's trying to lead.", '>>{egorgian} : So what do you suggest we do? Take the richest 8 men and redistribute their wealth equally among all humans? Congrats now you just made everyone $1 richer and liquidated all of their companies that actually dispense good morality. "Half of the world" comes from poverty stricken countries like Africa where I assume the average american probably holds the net worth combined of 10000 people.', '>>{Weyl-fermions} : One of those Men In Black flashlight things, ya know?', '>>{druuconian} : And explain to me how, as a non-DNC member, she is destroying the DNC?', '>>{AlisherUsmanov} : I dont remember anything from kindergarten. I think you are being unrealistic.', '>>{deck_hand} : If the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, then we should just kill those eight men, confiscate their entire wealth, and double the "net wealth" of the rest of the world. Of course, since half of the world has very, very little wealth to begin with, it would be almost meaningless to them. But it would make the envious much happier.', '>>{deck_hand} : One should not equate wealth with hard work. The world has never worked that way, and will never work that way. In fact, it should not work that way. If it did, then the disabled and elderly who could not longer work at all would be destitute.', '>>{data2dave} : Horrible optics and sound. May have a stroke if I see more of this.', ">>{noaltnoaltyouthealt} : Come off of it, Dems. Your inside-the-beltway, cocktail circuit way of creating incremental, symbolic change whilst getting filthy rich is obsolete and unwanted. Hand the keys over to the progressives. You're drunk.", '>>{Kleggo} : Now you are displaying naivety. I too operate under policies and agree at times there can be minor deviations. However, if you hear that one of your co-workers decided to set up their own email server to conduct all their company business when corporate policy says otherwise, and no one has ever done this before and no one is doing it now, and later you were asked about it, you sure as hell would be able to recall some of the details around it. It would stand out because it\'s such a deviation from the norm. I remember these wide deviations involving my colleagues not because they were huge events but exactly because they were so far from the standards. Look it up. It\'s basic human psychology. And I do remember my last birthday card from my mother. It was 29 years ago, and it read, "Love, Mom". She was never great with sentiment.', ">>{SiegeLion1} : Yeah I've heard they only truly stand out with some aftermarket upgrades, mostly stuff to take weight off the extruder so it doesn't wobble around too aggressively.", ">>{234879} : A job that can be replaced by a robot for greater efficiency, should be. We shouldn't keep around bullshit menial labor tasks just to create jobs.", '>>{L3SSTH4NTHR33} : People eat delicious fast food that make them feel good for a few minutes but has long term repeated-use side effects of making them fatty-bo-batties', ">>{Acidics} : So they like it. If they didn't like it they wouldn't eat it lol. You're arguing nonsense.", ">>{Pewpewlazor5} : > The party has failed consistently when through political trading and chicanery it has fallen into the control of those interests, personal and financial, which think in terms of dollars instead of in terms of human values.... > It is best not to straddle ideals.... > The party must go wholly one way or wholly the other. It cannot face in both directions at the same time. FDR on the democratic party in 1940. We are still in this fucking divide. When we have strong leaders who lead with their ***ideals***, and focus on ***human values*** - we win. When we focus on money values ***we lose***. His final conclusion even though we were in the middle of the great depression, a world war looming, and literal fascist monsters around the world (which is all scarier then Donald Trump) - he said > It is best for America to have the fight out here and now. It's not the time to unite...it's the time we have this fight. Money or Human values. What team do you fight for? If you focus on money - you are destroying the party. DWS has largely been fighting for money values. Along with many other Democrats... FDR's final conclusion was if he lost this fight - he would not run as a Democrat (and this was from the most popular president in US history) He won...and I plan to follow the founding father of the modern DNC.", '>>{flukz} : > 1. First, her lawyer objects, not her. Second, if its not relevant, you should note your objection. 2. When giving depo testimony... What kind of lawyer math is this shit?', '>>{LuniWin} : She and Brock are still extremely influential inside the Dem party.', '>>{YourBoyFrodoge} : Calls it "affordable" Actual arm costs $1400', ">>{druuconian} : > FDR on the democratic party in 1940. We are still in this fucking divide. When we have strong leaders who lead with their ideals, and focus on human values - we win. When we focus on money values we lose. Well, election results don't agree with you on that point. There were a few Bernie-approved progressive candidates for congress in 2016. *All* of them lost. And many of them, like Russ Feingold, did even worse than Hillary. In fact, nearly 100% of those corporate sellout establishment Democrats were reelected, even in a tough year like 2016. In addition, Bill Clinton hardly ran as an ideological progressive. And he was quite friendly to Wall Street. But he retook the White House for the first time in 12 years on that platform, and then was resoundingly reelected. I just don't see the evidence for this idea that embracing Bernie-style socialist progressivism is the secret sauce to winning elections. It couldn't even win Bernie his own election *among an audience of Democrats,* so it belies belief to thin it would win a general election where you face a much more conservative electorate. > If you focus on money - you are destroying the party. DWS has largely been fighting for money values. Along with many other Democrats... If you decide that it's better to throw the country to the wolves by allowing a Republican to become president rather than support a less-than-ideal Democratic candidate, then I believe *you* are destroying the party. When you focus so much on the divisions amongst ourselves that you lose sight of the fact that *literally any Demcorat* is far superior to the Republican alternative, you are not helping the progressive cause at all. > He won...and I plan to follow the founding father of the modern DNC. Hey, in the primaries, go nuts. If a progressive wins the primaries, I will support him or her wholeheatedly. Can you say the same if your favorite candidate doesn't win? I just think we need to have a fair nomination fight and then unite behind whoever the party's voters pick, even if you think that candidate isn't far enough to the left.", '>>{jglee1236} : Affordable compared to _____ and "affordable (*period*)" are two different things. $1400 is not affordable are you kidding me...', ">>{Acidics} : If drugs didn't have any benefits people wouldn't take them. You're arguing nonsense lol", ">>{Conjwa} : Yes, but only if you apply logic. We don't do that here in /r/politics", ">>{Seeker67} : Nobody's saying social medias don't have benefits. You, on the other hand, are saying people wouldn't use them if they had the alleged negative aspects.", ">>{234879} : What's a good entry-level 3d printer? I'm out of the loop on this one but still interested in getting one at some point", '>>{iamtherealdylan} : Makerbot used to be a driving force in open source 3D printing at one point. Open source, if you don\'t know, means that all of the design files are available to the public, so people can modify their printer and collaborate to make the design better, as well as build their own machine without even buying the parts from Makerbot. At one point, the CEO of Makerbot decided that he wasn\'t Steve Jobs enough. He made the next generation of Makerbots closed source with proprietary software, sleek designs, and mediocre hardware. The new machines were a "fuck you" to the community that fueled Makerbot, and they were aimed more at average consumers who don\'t even want/need an overpriced 3D printer. Applying Apple\'s design philosophy to something as niche as 3D printing was definitely a mistake.', '>>{ThrustyMcStab} : Half the world is 375 million people? Gross underestimation, miscalculation, or am I simply missing something about this comment?', ">>{everymananisland} : Terrible statistic. For example, infants born into the world are already richer the moment they take their first breath than a significant percentage of the population that is currently so in debt their income/wealth is negative. And I don't know off the top of my head how much of that negative wealth offsets those above them to start. It'd be more valuable to focus on how to get everyone richer/wealthier, not wring our hands about how much the top has.", ">>{iamtherealdylan} : I've heard a lot of good things about the [MP Select Mini](http://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=15365) for only $200 and their other printers. The [Prusa i3 printers](http://shop.prusa3d.com/en/3d-printers/59-original-prusa-i3-mk2-kit.html) are very well reviewed as well, but kind of expensive. A lot of Prusa clones (such as Wanhao's) are good as well, as far as I know. You should check out r/3dprinting", '>>{AlisherUsmanov} : No, this isnt naivete. When something doesnt matter to you, you dont remember the details. Granted, that isnt the case here, is it? She isnt saying she doesnt remember ALL details. She doesnt remember some, and when her memory is refreshed, she remembers more. Moreover, this wasnt a deviation from the norm. The new regulations that came out a few months after she got into office WERE the deviation form the norm. She just kept the norm, which was ambiguous and gray. She shouldnt have done that, but its quite easy to see why someone would forget. This wasnt their main job. I make a living making calls on what a reasonable man would and wouldnt do, I think Ive got this one covered. I dont remember the last birthday card from my mother, it was last year.', '>>{Lost_in_La_Mancha} : Not only the product, sometimes one may be even debugging the project itself...', '>>{AlisherUsmanov} : its not our strong suit. more like 1. a, b 2.', '>>{classic__schmosby} : > add an i to the link Chrome did it automatically... Kind of cool.', '>>{ThrustyMcStab} : Windows is basically a monopoly to most consumers unless they\'re not attached to most standard programs or games (if so get Linux) or buy overpriced products (Apple). Facebook is a digital drug. Or at least it has been proved to be addictive, and it\'s arguably also bad for you as it gathers and sells your personal information and behavior. I use Windows because I\'m a gamer and I don\'t have much of a choice. I only use facebook to stay up to date on family/friends\' events (nobody sends normal invitations any more, leaving facebook would mean being a social pariah at this point). Point is, I don\'t want to use these services. But I hardly have a choice. There are many like me. This puts a big asterisk next to "earned".', ">>{Kleggo} : Wait. You're saying setting up a personal email server in your residence was not a deviation from the norm? Who else did it? Wasn't the norm to use State department email on government systems? I can't tell if you are making a point about what Ms. Mills remembered or claimed to have forgotten, or if you are defending Hillary's obvious desire to avoid the freedom of information act. We can disagree on the first, but certainly you cannot be justifying the latter.", ">>{MyTribeCalledQuest} : This sort of setup didn't work out very well for Enron.", ">>{AlisherUsmanov} : In OUR context to the conversation, it was about what sort of deviation from the norm would trigger memory. We would have to parse Mills testimony because some of her answers had different predicates that change the analysis Im doing. What im saying is that the context for her not remembering things about testimony in the 90's and emails in the 2000's are different. As far as Clinton's actions are concerned, I have some defenses, but none for this late at night. I can say that Clinton's avoiding FOIA, and Lying about it, do little to make me want to vote for Sanders or Trump. Another candidate, sure.", ">>{Elipes_} : You do know how expensive the alternative is don't you?", ">>{PlankWithANailIn} : In order to be able to provide jobs you need customers, but you won't have any due to your service costing 10X the competitions.", '>>{felesroo} : I think the greater problem lies in not who has the money, but the mechanisms by which they became so rich. Lack of taxation, from income to investments, to inheritance, has allowed wealth to explode at the top disproportional to everyone else. Instead of the game getting harder to play, it gets easier. They\'ve "out leveled" the design of capitalism. Their wealth has so much economic gravity that it draws in more and more. It\'s not the individuals that have caused this, though certainly some have contributed through political pressure to get shitty laws passed, but it\'s the lawmakers themselves that cowtow to these interests instead of passing legislation that would level the playing field more. There will always be rich. What society needs to do is strike a balance. It should be very easy to make $1 and almost impossible to make $1 billion. The game should get harder as level increases, not easier. Any game like that breaks. So does society, eventually.', ">>{testa12} : What's this got to do with politics or is this subreddit just going to subvert to flagrant socialist propaganda now rather than at least pretending to hide it?", '>>{MyTribeCalledQuest} : I don\'t think that would work. After finishing you wouldn\'t be able to get "I don\'t know" out of your head!', '>>{cambrairt} : I want to preface what I\'m about to say by noting that I categorically cannot stand DWS. Her leadership of the Democratic party was abysmal and I\'m glad she\'s gone. However. Her above-referenced quote was meant to explain how unpledged delegates *favor* grassroots activists. Let\'s say Tom is a Bernie volunteer in Bellevue, WA, and wants to attend the Democratic National Convention. Unfortunately, as luck would have it, Tom ends up running against Congressman Adam Smith in his campaign for DNC delegate. He can whip votes however he likes -- Tom\'s gonna lose. How do you solve this problem? You make Congressman Smith an automatic delegate who doesn\'t have to be elected to the convention -- meaning he\'s not "...running against grassroots activists," who now have a fairer shot at getting elected. I am NOT saying the unpledged delegate system is fair or democratic. But her quote has been consistently twisted WAY out of context. We\'ve got years of actual shitty leadership to blame her for. I think it\'s best to just stick to that. EDIT: Wanted to add one thing: If we\'re gonna give DWS shit for this quote, let\'s give her shit for conflating automatic delegates with unpledged delegates -- that\'s where the real bullshit spin is here. She\'s right that it\'s desirable to avoid elected officials taking convention spots from activists, but she managed to fairly deftly sidestep the fact that there are ways of making them automatic delegates without simultaneously freeing them of any obligation to follow the will of said activists.', '>>{tokyoburns} : Dude, I have an Xbox and a cell phone that has Candy Crush and sports highlights. What more could I want?', '>>{everymananisland} : The problem here is that those arguing about inequality being "obscene" have yet to demonstrate that it is, in fact, a problem, never mind a more important one.', '>>{saymyname_withhonor} : So just a few years ago (too easy)', ">>{bostonscollege} : No one is arguing against that. Again, the link that I shared is just to give the situation some more perspective. Statistically speaking, I would assume every one of us here is closer to the global top 1% than the bottom 50%. I shared the article so people might be appreciative of their place in the world. The reason was not to write off billionaire's wealth as a non-issue (I said that in the first sentence).", '>>{cambrairt} : Thanks! It was a stupid slip on her part, really. All she had to do was say: >Unpledged delegates exist really to make sure that grassroots activists don’t have to be in a position where they are running against party leaders and elected officials. and she would have been understood properly.', '>>{bostonscollege} : Of course 30k per year and 10k per hour are huge differences--and it\'s sad. The numbers you mentioned put the spotlight on the top 1%, while the ones I mentioned expand it to many more Americans. I\'m just guessing here, but if you have a solid job you\'re probably making more than $1000 every pay period. There are 4-5 countries in Africa (depending on which study you look at) that have per capita GDP\'s of less than $1000, with some nations as low as $600. That\'s a country average for an entire year! You see how well off we are now? The thought I was trying to convey was not that wealth of the super rich wasn\'t a big deal. The first thing that I said in my comment was that it was disheartening. I also said people were right to scrutinize the mega rich. So I\'m not playing for the other side in this debate, I\'m just expanding the conversation. In essence, I\'m providing an even bigger perspective on wealth inequality because I\'m sharing the data that many people neglect. My goal was to make people feel grateful, and to think, "wow, I really am more fortunate than I thought I was." If at any point you thought that, then I see my comment as a success.', ">>{deflateddoritodinks} : I'm sure you're pleased about paying so much taxes. Paying taxes is fucking awesome especially for illegals and welfare.", '>>{escalation} : Massive penetration on both sides then. Seems like we need someone more tech savvy making decisions.', ">>{Dongle655} : This whole subreddit posts hyped up things that probably are not smart to invest money into. This and futurology are the two subreddits I see and go oh wow what's the concept destroying fault in this post.", '>>{TrumpCardStrategy} : You absolutely have a choice, you are judt abdicating your responsibility in making it to live with your video game addiction.', ">>{MydniteSon} : You know what...I don't mind. I actually like having roads, a police force, firefighters, public utilities, schools -when funded properly- that produce an educated population and workforce, hospitals, etc. How do you think that stuff gets paid for? Magic Beans?", ">>{deflateddoritodinks} : That's property taxes not income taxes. An educated population is just competition to me.", ">>{ThrustyMcStab} : Yes, between keep using fb or never know when somethings happening. Between using windows or significantly neutering my hobby. That's more blackmail than choice.", '>>{Cobaltsaber} : The maker in me says all this tech can make small business a lot more feasible and soon everyone will have an Etsy side hustle or freelance. The cynic in me says people are way too lazy to bother.', '>>{TrumpCardStrategy} : Actually the most recent study out indicates that a "goldilocks" sweet spot exists where too little and too much use are linked with bad outcomes, but moderate use can improve them.', ">>{830hobbes} : Yeah it has all the bells and whistles. 200W SLS, laser grid scanning, multiple print heads you can load up with pretty much any slurry, UV cure lamp. Problem is, the software and interaction with the hardware is horrific. Half the time the laser didn't work because some machine settings randomly undid themselves. Same for valves. Program crashes a bunch. Pretty half baked for such an expensive machine.", ">>{-FunkyPotato-} : People like you are why I can't find a good farrier.", ">>{PieInTheSky2020} : It's a person that makes horse hooves. I'm guessing that process has been automated and /u/-FunkyPotato- wants a hand crafted horse hoof for his bourgeoisie horse.", '>>{Sephran} : What a stupid number. If you compare even the richest person in the world, to all the people who make under 10$ a MONTH, of course the number and percentage will be high.', ">>{jerseyknit} : Just got the Monoprice Maker Select for about $330 and I've been very impressed. I agree with the other comment, checkout r/3dprinting", ">>{TrumpCardStrategy} : That's like saying nature blackmails you in eating, sheltering, and clothing yourself.", '>>{AlisherUsmanov} : That rules out every candidate then. Unless you count twitter as tech savvy.', ">>{Necro138} : Its a fancy packaged SCARA robot. They're nothing terribly special, and you can find them on eBay all the time. They're used alot in microelectronics manufacturing.", ">>{escalation} : I don't disagree. We're kinda fucked when the front running Dem is sponsored by the cable companies and will rely on them for info, and the front running Republican has expressed an interest in greater control of media in general. Maybe we should run someone who is a bit younger next time", '>>{everymananisland} : Can you be more specific? Because recent history seems to be showing that greater wealth inequality is not resulting in more stratification, but instead is happening during a time where many are rising out of poverty.', '>>{bostonscollege} : I understand what cost of living is, but I\'m not sure what you\'re trying to say. If you\'re looking at the "property holdings" part of the wealth equation, then you do have a point. However, keep in mind that someone who lives in a New York City apartment had to have the money to buy the expensive apartment in the first place. Just because cost of living is more expensive in some areas than others doesn\'t mean that the equation isn\'t valid. Take upstate New York, for example. The cost of living may be higher than in Somalia, but with that comes better quality of life. In higher income areas, you pay to play. The cost of living is just an indication of how wealthy the populous is and how much is costs to maintain a standard of living. A teacher in New York may pay more for her house than a teacher in Somalia, but where would you rather live? In New York, you\'ll get a good salary, handsome benefits, a nice place to live, etc. You can\'t say the same for Somalia. You raised a decent point, but you can\'t just look at cost of living as an equalizer and then nullifier in the discussion.', ">>{everymananisland} : I have researched the subject. The idea that wealth inequality is a major problem doesn't seem to hold up. Do you have contrary evidence?", ">>{yobsmezn} : [This article](http://www.forbes.com/sites/dalearcher/2013/09/04/could-americas-wealth-gap-lead-to-a-revolt/#7c4cc14da33f) is rich in useful links. It's a few years old and the problem has gotten worse since then, but the data and conclusions hold up.", '>>{MydniteSon} : And your point? You never specified the TYPE of taxes you were referring to.', ">>{everymananisland} : How do they hold up? Again, we're seeing fewer and fewer people in poverty. Wealth inequality is not negatively impacting society. That the wealthy have more is not why the lowest end has less, because wealth is not finite. This article is big on platitudes but actually kind of low on data, and the conclusions come with a lot of assumptions. What, specifically, are you talking about?", '>>{pb2crazy} : So many the_donald trolls in this thread. I have you all tagged. Your attempt to divide dems is transparent and disgusting.', '>>{-FunkyPotato-} : Horse shoes. And this is a joke I make when trying to illustrate ludditism in its many guises. Usually goes about this well.', '>>{PieInTheSky2020} : Lol. I was also joking (I called a horse bourgeoisie).', ">>{yobsmezn} : You could not have read the article and investigated the links in under 90 seconds, which was the interval before your reply, so I have to assume you're just messing with me.", '>>{The_BeardedGentleman} : ha hahaha hahahahaha Please, keep it up Deb. Sincerely, The Right Wing', ">>{SolidKGB} : eh maybe not but for most wise guys and politicians it's an effective tool. A lawyer can make most things happen. e.g buying property, setting up companies, moving money.", '>>{deflateddoritodinks} : Hmmm. Interesting question Wonder what taxes the Dems control? Hmmmm....give me a minute. Oh yeah! FEDERAL INCOME TAXES DUDE!', '>>{MostMarxistsAre} : Brock had a "heartattack". He\'ll be gone soon.', ">>{everymananisland} : If you think this is the first time I've seen an article originally posted in 2013... So can you answer my questions, or are you going to continue avoiding them?", ">>{lilrabbitfoofoo} : No, no it isn't. It's a faux scandal turned into red meat for the rightwing to feed to the pundits and bloggers for the gullible.", ">>{lilrabbitfoofoo} : Over Cheney's energy task force meeting logs. Apparently, their billionaire backer had an issue with this one situation. Maybe he wasn't invited? :P Everything else they've done is just direct rightwing partisan flackery, however.", '>>{KamalaKHAAAAAAAAAN} : ROFL dumbest fuckin argument ever. "People use heroin, therefore making it good to them." Truly an idiotic argument that assumes all people act to their own benefit.', ">>{lilrabbitfoofoo} : An excellent find. Thanks. Yeah, they've been harassing Bill and then Hillary since the 90's, so...I'm not surprised.", '>>{KamalaKHAAAAAAAAAN} : Let\'s see how far down the "I was never taught logical skills" rabbit-hole goes... Cigarette Smokers too? They like smoking?', ">>{Dan-Fu} : I'll rejoin the Democratic Party when I see Hillary herself behead Debbie Wasserman Schultz and David Brock personally; until then the Dems can go to hell.", ">>{KamalaKHAAAAAAAAAN} : Oh for fuck's sake... Go learn what a cost-benefit analysis is.", '>>{lilrabbitfoofoo} : Thanks for noticing. Enjoy it! As long as Judicial Watch exists, so will the phrase "rightwing smearfishing expedition". I promise you that.', '>>{MostMarxistsAre} : Than why did he sell out to Hillary Clinton, the human embodiment of the establishment?', '>>{Uktabi86} : Dont allow the DNC to fool you. If you are progressive go justicedemocrats.', ">>{yobsmezn} : I have found a common tactic of conservative commenters is to demand other people do their homework for them. I provide a useful resource, you shrug it off. And so on. If I fail to do the work I'm avoiding your questions. It's refined trollery, but it's still trollery.", ">>{Huckleberry_Win} : How about you go point and point and debunk it for me then? Write up something as thorough as you'll find by users Nebraskagunowner or Zan5ski, debunking that she broke the specific laws mentioned. Until then, enjoy your downvote (which I will gladly turn into an upvote if you surprise me), and just stop trying spread this garbage misinformation.", '>>{Mattcwu} : Hey Washington! I was a Bernie Sanders delegate from Washington, but I got cheated out of going to Olympia.', ">>{lilrabbitfoofoo} : That's already been done by the people that were downvoted into oblivion. But I guess you didn't get to read those responses. I wonder why? The bottom line is that the same people like JW do this every election against every Democratic nominee. It's not about facts. It's not about evidence. It's about personal attacks, smears, and innuendo. When a competent legal authority determines anyone did anything at all illegal (which so far NO ONE has), then we can talk about this. But I'll bet the last thirty years of JW lies and smear campaigns that this winds up exactly like all of those did...with no crimes or charges at all.", '>>{cambrairt} : All other context aside, I have zero doubt that the order of her words was not coincidental and reflects the spirit of how she views grassroots activists. She sucks.', '>>{Huckleberry_Win} : There three three responses in this topic thread that have been "downvoted into oblivion" and none of them have a point by point breakdown. Your entire argument is that they\'ve been around going after democrats forever? Nothing about the specific laws that just the publicly known evidence proves she broke? That\'s weak. Citing that someone was wrong for years does not mean they can\'t stumble across something right. Your argument would be laughed out of the courtroom if it was a defense. So allow me to laugh you out of this conversation. I\'m done here. Go read up on the who was administering the server, Justin Cooper, and show me their clearance level (hint: it\'s tough to have top secret clearance when you aren\'t an employee of the government...)', '>>{chasjo} : Focus on Bernie being illegitimate as a Democratic Presidential candidate was counterproductive during the election. It\'s asinine at this point where Bernie has an official leadership position and the loyalty of the majority of Democratic voters. Why would we want Bernie "brought to heel" as an official Democratic functionary when he is the best and most popular asset we have as things are now? Tribalism?', '>>{everymananisland} : Well, you made the claim. You backed it up using a poor source, so I asked for clarification. Continuing the discussion is not trolling, nor is asking for reasons why you find it compelling given the critique of the data presented. So can you answer the question?', ">>{Acidics} : You seem to be very lost. Humans have the capability of choosing what they do. If they did not like something, they would not do it. It's simple and your lack of understanding is dangerous.", '>>{lilrabbitfoofoo} : > Nothing about the specific laws that just the publicly known evidence proves she broke? No competent legal authority has made any such a claim at all.', '>>{KamalaKHAAAAAAAAAN} : Answer my question. Do cigarette smokers *like* smoking?', ">>{KamalaKHAAAAAAAAAN} : He's arguing *on relativity* when the study is just about simple overall worth. Without his introducing that relativist context, COL wouldn't matter here because it doesn't apply to the study. He basically created a new context, under which the study was not conducted.", ">>{Acidics} : Yes. That is why they do it. They enjoy the feeling the cigarette provides them. If they didn't like the feeling they got when they smoked, why would they do it?", '>>{KamalaKHAAAAAAAAAN} : [Sorry to scare you with entirely new concepts...](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Addiction)', ">>{Acidics} : They're addicted because they like the feeling. Confirming what I said before.", '>>{Dassiell} : Yeah but the article acts condescending like "people going against the top 1% don\'t realize they\'re part of it!" But it\'s a different one percent, so that\'s misleading. Boston represent btw']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{Shanemaier} : I feel like I owe you a fee for all of this legal advice', '>>{postmoderncoyote} : Doesn\'t the "and she knows it" implicate her at all?', ">>{_tx} : I've never dealt with the FBI, but I'd imagine they know what they are doing. The SEC definately does that.", ">>{AlisherUsmanov} : Here's my perception of the truth. Clinton is defensive, and understandably so. She has been after facing an unusual amount of attacks at her politically for an abnormal amount of time. Any smart republican strategist could see that she was always a candidate for president, even when Bill was in office. Now, partly because of this defensiveness, and partly for convenience, she set up a server in her home. She was only really comfortable using the email on her blackberry, and didnt know all that much about how everything worked. She likely had some notion that it wasnt completely okay, but like many policies, you do what you can get away with. Benghazi was another example of faux republican outrage, and then they found this. This investigation came from the wrong intentions. She was right to be defensive. She likely had no understanding of what sort of information could have been hacked from her server, and she also probably assumed in the most rose tinted of glasses that all of her emails to or from others would be preserved on their server side records. She knows she fucked up, and has been playing stall ball and while admitting it was wrong, does not want to admit to everything. She doesnt because she is defensive. She knows what republicans can do to this sort of information. She has seen it first hand. She truly believes in serving the country and doesnt want someone like Trump to be president. Thats what I believe the reality is. Id put money on it.", '>>{DamagedHells} : I can remember if I ever fucking testified on something. Are you kidding me?', '>>{AlisherUsmanov} : I think you are missing it. She knows its silly that she cant use the blackberry, just how its silly that my grandma doesnt know how to clear the microwave timer, and that shit always says 17 seconds.', '>>{AlisherUsmanov} : Youre missing the context. Never said he said it. Delaying isnt necessarily not cooperative. Its all a process.', ">>{DamagedHells} : So, what you're saying is that someone has had to testify so many times that they can't remember testifying for something? How in the Hell does that not seem problematic to some of you?", '>>{AlisherUsmanov} : And if I produced a document that showed that it said "I love you, son, cant wait to see you" then we have problems.', '>>{AlisherUsmanov} : I have been in court so many times I dont remember a lot of them. Would you say going to court is something you would remember. Testifying isnt a big deal to some people, given their professions.', '>>{spacemonkeey} : >"mercenary lawyers for hire" Kid, they\'ve been on Hillary\'s tale since she first ran for senator. That\'s 16 years ago. http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/AA_HW06_Hillary-FEC-Complaint.pdf I hope this helps you on your way.', ">>{DamagedHells} : I don't believe you've ever been in a courtroom.", ">>{sundialinshade} : It shouldn't have to come to that, but its clever of you to find a way to work around it.", ">>{Shanemaier} : Fair enough, in the same sense delaying isn't necessarily cooperative either. I get what your saying though.", '>>{pissbum-emeritus} : > What was written in your birthday card from your mother, 3 years ago? "Don\'t spend it all on booze." Love, Mom', '>>{pissbum-emeritus} : I thought this exchange could use a little friendly humor.', ">>{FrozenSquirrel} : Quit trying to make 'smearfishing' happen. It's not gonna happen.", ">>{SolidKGB} : Actually it's done often by mobsters. That's why wise guys are so tight with their representation.", '>>{Xbajuju} : At least when Shkreli was ordered before congess, he told them ahead of time he was going to plead the fifth, making the whole thing a waste of time and just a smear on him. These people are just taking lines out of hillarys PlayBook.', '>>{outsider} : Which is odd since the FOIA was something passed under Bill Clinton while she was FLOTUS.', ">>{TheTelephone} : It's from Eric Boswell, who was Assistant Secretary of Diplomatic Security.", ">>{DamagedHells} : Haha I haven't had time to read the report yet.", '>>{le_f} : Trump should film a short re-enactment of this and make a campaign ad.', '>>{bananaJazzHands} : >lts pretty silly and she knows it. It seriously would take two minutes to train her to use the computer. "Click here, login, click here, type your email, click send."', ">>{AtheismTooStronk} : She said she doesn't remember testifying. I remember every time I went to the principal's office in Kindergarten.", '>>{Weyl-fermions} : One of those Men In Black flashlight things, ya know?', '>>{AlisherUsmanov} : I dont remember anything from kindergarten. I think you are being unrealistic.', '>>{Kleggo} : Now you are displaying naivety. I too operate under policies and agree at times there can be minor deviations. However, if you hear that one of your co-workers decided to set up their own email server to conduct all their company business when corporate policy says otherwise, and no one has ever done this before and no one is doing it now, and later you were asked about it, you sure as hell would be able to recall some of the details around it. It would stand out because it\'s such a deviation from the norm. I remember these wide deviations involving my colleagues not because they were huge events but exactly because they were so far from the standards. Look it up. It\'s basic human psychology. And I do remember my last birthday card from my mother. It was 29 years ago, and it read, "Love, Mom". She was never great with sentiment.', '>>{flukz} : > 1. First, her lawyer objects, not her. Second, if its not relevant, you should note your objection. 2. When giving depo testimony... What kind of lawyer math is this shit?', '>>{AlisherUsmanov} : No, this isnt naivete. When something doesnt matter to you, you dont remember the details. Granted, that isnt the case here, is it? She isnt saying she doesnt remember ALL details. She doesnt remember some, and when her memory is refreshed, she remembers more. Moreover, this wasnt a deviation from the norm. The new regulations that came out a few months after she got into office WERE the deviation form the norm. She just kept the norm, which was ambiguous and gray. She shouldnt have done that, but its quite easy to see why someone would forget. This wasnt their main job. I make a living making calls on what a reasonable man would and wouldnt do, I think Ive got this one covered. I dont remember the last birthday card from my mother, it was last year.', '>>{AlisherUsmanov} : its not our strong suit. more like 1. a, b 2.', ">>{Kleggo} : Wait. You're saying setting up a personal email server in your residence was not a deviation from the norm? Who else did it? Wasn't the norm to use State department email on government systems? I can't tell if you are making a point about what Ms. Mills remembered or claimed to have forgotten, or if you are defending Hillary's obvious desire to avoid the freedom of information act. We can disagree on the first, but certainly you cannot be justifying the latter.", ">>{MyTribeCalledQuest} : This sort of setup didn't work out very well for Enron.", ">>{AlisherUsmanov} : In OUR context to the conversation, it was about what sort of deviation from the norm would trigger memory. We would have to parse Mills testimony because some of her answers had different predicates that change the analysis Im doing. What im saying is that the context for her not remembering things about testimony in the 90's and emails in the 2000's are different. As far as Clinton's actions are concerned, I have some defenses, but none for this late at night. I can say that Clinton's avoiding FOIA, and Lying about it, do little to make me want to vote for Sanders or Trump. Another candidate, sure.", '>>{MyTribeCalledQuest} : I don\'t think that would work. After finishing you wouldn\'t be able to get "I don\'t know" out of your head!', '>>{saymyname_withhonor} : So just a few years ago (too easy)', '>>{escalation} : Massive penetration on both sides then. Seems like we need someone more tech savvy making decisions.', '>>{AlisherUsmanov} : That rules out every candidate then. Unless you count twitter as tech savvy.', ">>{escalation} : I don't disagree. We're kinda fucked when the front running Dem is sponsored by the cable companies and will rely on them for info, and the front running Republican has expressed an interest in greater control of media in general. Maybe we should run someone who is a bit younger next time", ">>{SolidKGB} : eh maybe not but for most wise guys and politicians it's an effective tool. A lawyer can make most things happen. e.g buying property, setting up companies, moving money.", ">>{lilrabbitfoofoo} : No, no it isn't. It's a faux scandal turned into red meat for the rightwing to feed to the pundits and bloggers for the gullible.", ">>{lilrabbitfoofoo} : Over Cheney's energy task force meeting logs. Apparently, their billionaire backer had an issue with this one situation. Maybe he wasn't invited? :P Everything else they've done is just direct rightwing partisan flackery, however.", ">>{lilrabbitfoofoo} : An excellent find. Thanks. Yeah, they've been harassing Bill and then Hillary since the 90's, so...I'm not surprised.", '>>{lilrabbitfoofoo} : Thanks for noticing. Enjoy it! As long as Judicial Watch exists, so will the phrase "rightwing smearfishing expedition". I promise you that.', ">>{Huckleberry_Win} : How about you go point and point and debunk it for me then? Write up something as thorough as you'll find by users Nebraskagunowner or Zan5ski, debunking that she broke the specific laws mentioned. Until then, enjoy your downvote (which I will gladly turn into an upvote if you surprise me), and just stop trying spread this garbage misinformation.", ">>{lilrabbitfoofoo} : That's already been done by the people that were downvoted into oblivion. But I guess you didn't get to read those responses. I wonder why? The bottom line is that the same people like JW do this every election against every Democratic nominee. It's not about facts. It's not about evidence. It's about personal attacks, smears, and innuendo. When a competent legal authority determines anyone did anything at all illegal (which so far NO ONE has), then we can talk about this. But I'll bet the last thirty years of JW lies and smear campaigns that this winds up exactly like all of those did...with no crimes or charges at all.", '>>{Huckleberry_Win} : There three three responses in this topic thread that have been "downvoted into oblivion" and none of them have a point by point breakdown. Your entire argument is that they\'ve been around going after democrats forever? Nothing about the specific laws that just the publicly known evidence proves she broke? That\'s weak. Citing that someone was wrong for years does not mean they can\'t stumble across something right. Your argument would be laughed out of the courtroom if it was a defense. So allow me to laugh you out of this conversation. I\'m done here. Go read up on the who was administering the server, Justin Cooper, and show me their clearance level (hint: it\'s tough to have top secret clearance when you aren\'t an employee of the government...)', '>>{lilrabbitfoofoo} : > Nothing about the specific laws that just the publicly known evidence proves she broke? No competent legal authority has made any such a claim at all.'], ['>>{Departugal} : Wasserman Schultz to Sanders: ‘We Are Already A Grassroots Party’', ">>{Kierkegaardensalad} : All I've got for this one is a big fat bucket of *lol.*", ">>{_CtrlAltLeft_} : No they aren't. Those two are the establishment, bought and paid for.", ">>{yeti77} : He's right that they're not, she's right that he should actually join the party if he wants to change it.", '>>{alisdairejay} : You know, sometimes I really wish we lived in an honor culture where officials felt obliged to commit [seppuku](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seppuku) instead of doubling down on their failure and incompetence.', ">>{AwkwardBurritoChick} : http://www.salon.com/2016/02/13/un_democratic_party_dnc_chair_says_superdelegates_ensure_elites_dont_have_to_run_against_grassroots_activists/ > Unpledged delegates exist really to make sure that party leaders and elected officials don’t have to be in a position where they are running against grassroots activists. She's such a liar.", ">>{MydniteSon} : So I happen to live in Wasserman Schultz's district. As far as what she has done for us locally as a Representative, I have very few complaints about her. Actually think she does a great job in that respect. As far as anything to do with national reach, I wish I could say the same. She's been a mess there.", ">>{thewholedamnplanet} : Yes, Wall Street always gives millions to grass roots parties because they're nutty like that. Until the DNC changes it will always be GOPlite. 75% less evil is better but still too much.", '>>{olb3} : Why is DWS still affiliated with the party. As a progressive myself, I view her being forced out of the party as one of the fastest ways to unite the party.', ">>{aledlewis} : She's still pushing for unity in 2017, I see.", '>>{aledlewis} : Too late, Debs. The top-down overhaul began the minute that she resigned from the DNC in disgrace.', ">>{6heismans} : I don't know how Russia managed to get her to go on television to say this live. God those guys are good.", '>>{remarkless} : Democratic electorate to Wasserman Schultz: "Shut the fuck and go away" Seriously, in the end, she\'s more toxic for the party than HRC.', '>>{anon902503} : God damn, I wish she could just shut the fuck up. All she does is inflame in-party fighting.', '>>{theschoolofjarule} : Every time this reptilian shows her face the DNC loses 10,000 votes. Get this sellout train wreck off TV.', ">>{BenderRodriguez14} : It's interesting how Debbie hasn't learned to shut her mouth and keep it shut, I hate Trump with a passion but we've got Schultz to thank maybe more than anybody for (and not necessarily for Clinton winning, but for her overall involvement). She's complete political poison at this stage and needs to accept that she's done. As tone deaf as she is though, I won't be holding my breath.", '>>{yoramrod} : She looks nervous and you can see the lump in her throat before she starts talking. This is usually the sign of somebody who is lying. The Republican health bill didn\'t lose because of Democratic "grassroots", it lost because of a divided GOP. Wasserman is the epitome of a big-money, establishment, Democract, and She is one of the primary reasons Trump is president. The media and voter\'s would shun her.', '>>{joshdts} : See you just said Russia, he was just using your words back at you in a circular use of the Russia. Like you said. You.', '>>{Noctus102} : She also presided over Democrats getting absolutely wiped out in state level races. She was an AWFUL leader.', '>>{druuconian} : So does that mean Bernie would have to knife himself for losing the primary?', ">>{druuconian} : Because Sanders fans mounted an ineffective primary challenge. Her district likes her, even if some Dems outside of her district don't.", ">>{druuconian} : Nah, but I'm sure Russia is either actively pushing this story and/or is thrilled that others are actively pushing this story. They absolutely tried (and succeeded) to exacerbate disunity on the left.", ">>{druuconian} : Bernie fans don't really have room to talk about party affiliation until and unless Bernie joins the party he's trying to lead.", '>>{druuconian} : And explain to me how, as a non-DNC member, she is destroying the DNC?', '>>{data2dave} : Horrible optics and sound. May have a stroke if I see more of this.', ">>{noaltnoaltyouthealt} : Come off of it, Dems. Your inside-the-beltway, cocktail circuit way of creating incremental, symbolic change whilst getting filthy rich is obsolete and unwanted. Hand the keys over to the progressives. You're drunk.", ">>{Pewpewlazor5} : > The party has failed consistently when through political trading and chicanery it has fallen into the control of those interests, personal and financial, which think in terms of dollars instead of in terms of human values.... > It is best not to straddle ideals.... > The party must go wholly one way or wholly the other. It cannot face in both directions at the same time. FDR on the democratic party in 1940. We are still in this fucking divide. When we have strong leaders who lead with their ***ideals***, and focus on ***human values*** - we win. When we focus on money values ***we lose***. His final conclusion even though we were in the middle of the great depression, a world war looming, and literal fascist monsters around the world (which is all scarier then Donald Trump) - he said > It is best for America to have the fight out here and now. It's not the time to unite...it's the time we have this fight. Money or Human values. What team do you fight for? If you focus on money - you are destroying the party. DWS has largely been fighting for money values. Along with many other Democrats... FDR's final conclusion was if he lost this fight - he would not run as a Democrat (and this was from the most popular president in US history) He won...and I plan to follow the founding father of the modern DNC.", '>>{LuniWin} : She and Brock are still extremely influential inside the Dem party.', ">>{druuconian} : > FDR on the democratic party in 1940. We are still in this fucking divide. When we have strong leaders who lead with their ideals, and focus on human values - we win. When we focus on money values we lose. Well, election results don't agree with you on that point. There were a few Bernie-approved progressive candidates for congress in 2016. *All* of them lost. And many of them, like Russ Feingold, did even worse than Hillary. In fact, nearly 100% of those corporate sellout establishment Democrats were reelected, even in a tough year like 2016. In addition, Bill Clinton hardly ran as an ideological progressive. And he was quite friendly to Wall Street. But he retook the White House for the first time in 12 years on that platform, and then was resoundingly reelected. I just don't see the evidence for this idea that embracing Bernie-style socialist progressivism is the secret sauce to winning elections. It couldn't even win Bernie his own election *among an audience of Democrats,* so it belies belief to thin it would win a general election where you face a much more conservative electorate. > If you focus on money - you are destroying the party. DWS has largely been fighting for money values. Along with many other Democrats... If you decide that it's better to throw the country to the wolves by allowing a Republican to become president rather than support a less-than-ideal Democratic candidate, then I believe *you* are destroying the party. When you focus so much on the divisions amongst ourselves that you lose sight of the fact that *literally any Demcorat* is far superior to the Republican alternative, you are not helping the progressive cause at all. > He won...and I plan to follow the founding father of the modern DNC. Hey, in the primaries, go nuts. If a progressive wins the primaries, I will support him or her wholeheatedly. Can you say the same if your favorite candidate doesn't win? I just think we need to have a fair nomination fight and then unite behind whoever the party's voters pick, even if you think that candidate isn't far enough to the left.", ">>{Conjwa} : Yes, but only if you apply logic. We don't do that here in /r/politics", '>>{cambrairt} : I want to preface what I\'m about to say by noting that I categorically cannot stand DWS. Her leadership of the Democratic party was abysmal and I\'m glad she\'s gone. However. Her above-referenced quote was meant to explain how unpledged delegates *favor* grassroots activists. Let\'s say Tom is a Bernie volunteer in Bellevue, WA, and wants to attend the Democratic National Convention. Unfortunately, as luck would have it, Tom ends up running against Congressman Adam Smith in his campaign for DNC delegate. He can whip votes however he likes -- Tom\'s gonna lose. How do you solve this problem? You make Congressman Smith an automatic delegate who doesn\'t have to be elected to the convention -- meaning he\'s not "...running against grassroots activists," who now have a fairer shot at getting elected. I am NOT saying the unpledged delegate system is fair or democratic. But her quote has been consistently twisted WAY out of context. We\'ve got years of actual shitty leadership to blame her for. I think it\'s best to just stick to that. EDIT: Wanted to add one thing: If we\'re gonna give DWS shit for this quote, let\'s give her shit for conflating automatic delegates with unpledged delegates -- that\'s where the real bullshit spin is here. She\'s right that it\'s desirable to avoid elected officials taking convention spots from activists, but she managed to fairly deftly sidestep the fact that there are ways of making them automatic delegates without simultaneously freeing them of any obligation to follow the will of said activists.', '>>{cambrairt} : Thanks! It was a stupid slip on her part, really. All she had to do was say: >Unpledged delegates exist really to make sure that grassroots activists don’t have to be in a position where they are running against party leaders and elected officials. and she would have been understood properly.', ">>{deflateddoritodinks} : I'm sure you're pleased about paying so much taxes. Paying taxes is fucking awesome especially for illegals and welfare.", ">>{MydniteSon} : You know what...I don't mind. I actually like having roads, a police force, firefighters, public utilities, schools -when funded properly- that produce an educated population and workforce, hospitals, etc. How do you think that stuff gets paid for? Magic Beans?", ">>{deflateddoritodinks} : That's property taxes not income taxes. An educated population is just competition to me.", '>>{MydniteSon} : And your point? You never specified the TYPE of taxes you were referring to.', '>>{pb2crazy} : So many the_donald trolls in this thread. I have you all tagged. Your attempt to divide dems is transparent and disgusting.', '>>{The_BeardedGentleman} : ha hahaha hahahahaha Please, keep it up Deb. Sincerely, The Right Wing', '>>{deflateddoritodinks} : Hmmm. Interesting question Wonder what taxes the Dems control? Hmmmm....give me a minute. Oh yeah! FEDERAL INCOME TAXES DUDE!', '>>{MostMarxistsAre} : Brock had a "heartattack". He\'ll be gone soon.', ">>{Dan-Fu} : I'll rejoin the Democratic Party when I see Hillary herself behead Debbie Wasserman Schultz and David Brock personally; until then the Dems can go to hell.", '>>{MostMarxistsAre} : Than why did he sell out to Hillary Clinton, the human embodiment of the establishment?', '>>{Uktabi86} : Dont allow the DNC to fool you. If you are progressive go justicedemocrats.', '>>{Mattcwu} : Hey Washington! I was a Bernie Sanders delegate from Washington, but I got cheated out of going to Olympia.', '>>{cambrairt} : All other context aside, I have zero doubt that the order of her words was not coincidental and reflects the spirit of how she views grassroots activists. She sucks.', '>>{chasjo} : Focus on Bernie being illegitimate as a Democratic Presidential candidate was counterproductive during the election. It\'s asinine at this point where Bernie has an official leadership position and the loyalty of the majority of Democratic voters. Why would we want Bernie "brought to heel" as an official Democratic functionary when he is the best and most popular asset we have as things are now? Tribalism?'], ['>>{WienerNuggetLog} : Opportunist anti-Semitic clown that will do anything to raise her profile', ">>{maglevwholphin} : You and Ivanka together in the cockpit of a Mechva MK89-D, chaingun and railgums glowing white hot as the sun sets over a bloodied Jerusalem sky. The last enemy slain, both unsure if any other survivors remain on either side. You look into one another's eyes, knowing, now is the time. And commence, solemnly, in perpetuating the survival of our very species.", '>>{Schiffy94} : A tool who was too chicken shit to ditch her father\'s campaign trail after the "sheriff\'s star" fiasco.', ">>{Jeb-ExclamationPoint} : Wait you just said WHAT about Ivanka? This isn't okay. No.", ">>{AleppoMoment} : Hey, I'm not the judge of you but I was always taught that if I don't have anything nice to say I should keep my mouth shut ever thought of that?", '>>{maglevwholphin} : I-... Ivanka.. "Yes."', ">>{Bujidou} : Isn't telling a whole race of people what to think about someone kind of fucked up?", ">>{MWM2} : > Hey, I'm not the judge of you but... Did you steal that from a stand-up comic?", ">>{MWM2} : I bet mentally younger and he's a t_d denizen.", ">>{MWM2} : 1\\. You're talking to yourself. 2\\. *We can hear you.*", ">>{MWM2} : I read the first two paragraphs... > The biblical story of Esther is an imperfect allegory for the Trump family, but as for Ivanka, the comparison isn't half bad.* Esther is a Jewish woman who conceals her identity when she becomes the bride of a powerful king. It is only when she reveals who she is that she can save the Jewish people from an evil adviser plotting their destruction. > > Like Esther, Ivanka might appear to be nothing more than a pretty face until she shows that she's the savviest person in the room. Like Esther, Ivanka has a familial, almost accidental position of influence with a powerful gentile political figure. And like Esther, Ivanka's Jewishness is veiled: Something she describes as an important part of her identity and family life—she's an Orthodox convert, but she rarely agrees to talk about her faith—is essentially invisible to those who don't know it's there. ...and I stopped there. Ivanka is probably just like everybody else in Trump's inner circle: greedy, unethical, immoral and possibly evil. **Name me a single exception.** Esther-like she is not.", '>>{kool-keith} : married a jew, converted to judaism, raises her children as jewish is an anti-semite according to you ...', '>>{WienerNuggetLog} : Opportunist I said. Will do anything for the money', ">>{tau-lepton} : From the person who just posted >Emotional Hillary Clinton displays a thunderous scowl before clocking cameras and flashing fake smile at inauguration (mirror.co.uk) Do you know the definition of hypocrisy? But I'm not judging you", ">>{UrukHaiGuyz} : She's the next generation/evolution of Trump. Still the same hypocritical, amoral, money-grubbing hucksters in a prettier, softer package. Kind of like how Donny's no hero for not being an open John Bircher like his father was, Ivanka doesn't deserve praise because she can refrain from openly mocking the disabled, for instance. She's just as shitty a person for supporting and enabling her father's brand of crass hatred. Like the quote in the article says: >[“I think Jews, of all people, should know that when you embrace a xenophobic movement, even if in that moment Jews aren’t on the top of that list, we’re not far behind,” said Savage in an interview. “In the moment, I felt a deep sense that we should know better.”](https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/09/what-should-american-jews-make-of-ivanka-trump/498476/)", '>>{WienerNuggetLog} : Yeah. Ever heard of going against your interests? Hilljacks in aca plans voting against', '>>{kool-keith} : > married a jew, converted to judaism, raises her children as jewish > > > > is an anti-semite according to you ...'], [">>{popdisaster00} : 'Obscene' inequality: Oxfam says 8 men as rich as half the world", ">>{ienfull} : > Oxfam used Forbes' billionaires list that was last published in March 2016 to make its headline claim. According to the Forbes list, Microsoft founder Gates is the richest individual with a net worth of $75 billion. The others, in order of ranking, are Amancio Ortega, the Spanish founder of fashion house Inditex, financier Warren Buffett, Mexican business magnate Carlos Slim Helu, Amazon boss Jeff Bezos, Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg, Oracle's Larry Ellison and Bloomberg, the former mayor of New York. Three of these people are Jewish. What is Oxfam trying to say here, exactly? That successful Jews should have their money redistributed? The Nazis did that.", '>>{AcerRubrum} : Theyre also all gigantic benefactors to charities and have pledged to give their fortunes away when they die.', '>>{bostonscollege} : This is interesting (and pretty disheartening), but I think regular Americans forget just how much better off *they* are when compared to the rest of the world. The Economist [published an article](http://www.economist.com/news/business-and-finance/21710771-new-analysis-how-worlds-wealth-distributed-you-may-be-higher-up) in November about global wealth distribution, with the following findings (they define wealth as the sum of your bank deposits, financial investments and property holdings minus your debts): * If your life is worth $2,220, you\'re in the global top 50% * If your life is worth $71,560, you\'re in the global top 10% * If your life is worth $744,400, you\'re in the global top 1% The subtitle of the article is "the one per center next door," and it closes with the following remark: >Some of those railing against the global elite probably do not know they belong to it. We\'re very quick to scrutinize the richest of the rich (and sometimes rightfully so), but I think it\'s worth it to at least gain some perspective of how well we all do when compared to the rest of the world. The vast majority of us are very fortunate to live like kings, and I think for this we should be most appreciative.', ">>{SarcasticallyAShill} : Now imagine that half of the world, 375 million people storming each of those 8 estates. This is what I don't get about obscene wealth, I'd always be worried about the rabble dragging me out of bed at night and throwing me against a wall.", ">>{pwomptastic} : Pretty sure they do worry about this. That's why they make sure we focus on hating each-other instead of them.", '>>{orezinlv} : And somehow they "earned" it. Uhuh.', ">>{Chronic_Apathy1} : For what it's worth, several of those 8 men have donated millions and millions of dollars to various charities around the world and have pledged to donate billions more.", ">>{SarcasticallyAShill} : I'm just saying, that's the numbers we're talking about here.", '>>{yobsmezn} : That is the fallacy of relative privation in action there: " dismissing an argument or complaint due to the existence of more important problems in the world, regardless of whether those problems bear relevance to the initial argument." (wikipedia)', '>>{pizzashill} : >> the middle of the 1700s, as the gap between rich and poor widened, as violence and the threat of violence increased, the problem of control became more serious. What if these different despised groups-the Indians, the slaves, the poor whites-should combine? Even before diere were so many blacks, in the seventeenth century, there was, as Abbot Smith puts it, "a lively fear that servants would join with Negroes or Indians to overcome the small number of masters." >> There was little chance that whites and Indians would combine in North America as they were doing in South and Central America, where the shortage of women, and the use of Indians on the plantations, led to daily contact. Only in Georgia and South Carolina, where white women were scarce, was there some sexual mixing of white men and Indian women. In general, the Indian had been pushed out of sight, out of touch. One fact disturbed: whites would run off to join Indian tribes, or would be captured in battle and brought up among the Indians, and when this happened the whites, given a chance to leave, chose to stay in the Indian culture, Indians, having the choice, almost never decided to join the whites. Hector St. Jean Crevecoeur, the Frenchman who lived in America for almost twenty years, told, in Letters from an American Farmer, how children captured during the Seven Years\' War and found by their parents, grown up and living with Indians, would refuse to leave their new families. >> "There must be in their social bond," he said, "something singularly captivating, and far superior to anything to be boasted among us; for thousands of Europeans are Indians, and we have no examples of even one of those Aborigines having from choice become Europeans." >> But this affected few people. In general, the Indian was kept at a distance. And the colonial officialdom had found a way of alleviating the danger: by monopolizing the good land on the eastern seaboard, they forced landless whites to move westward to the frontier, there to encounter the Indians and to be a buffer for the seaboard rich against Indian troubles, white becoming more dependent on the government for protection. Bacon\'s Rebellion was instructive: to conciliate a diminishing Indian population at the expense of infuriating a coalition of white frontiersmen was very risky. Better to make war on the Indian, gain the support of the white, divert possible class conflict by turning poor whites against Indians for the security of the elite. >> Might blacks and Indians combine against the white enemy? In the northern colonies (except on Cape Cod, Martha\'s Vineyard, and Rhode Island, where there was close contact and sexual mixing), there was not much opportunity for Africans and Indians to meet in large numbers. New York had the largest slave population in the North, and there was some contact between blacks and Indians, as in 1712 when Africans and Indians joined in an insurrection. But this was quickly suppressed. In the Carolinas, however, whites were outnumbered by black slaves and nearby Indian tribes; in the 1750s, 25,000 whites faced 40,000 black slaves, with 60,000 Creek, Cherokee, Choctaw, and Chickasaw Indians in the area. Gary Nash writes: "Indian uprisings that punctuated the colonial period and a succession of slave uprisings and insurrectionary plots that were nipped in the bud kept South Carolinians sickeningly aware that only through the greatest vigilance and through policies designed to keep their enemies divided could they hope to remain in control of the situation." >> Edmund Morgan, on the basis of his careful study of slavery in Virginia, sees racism not as "natural" to black-white difference, but something coming out of class scorn, a realistic device for control. "If freemen with disappointed hopes should make common cause with slaves of desperate hope, the results might be worse than anything Bacon had done. The answer to the problem, obvious if unspoken and only gradually recognized, was racism, to separate dangerous free whites from dangerous black slaves by a screen of racial contempt." >> There was still another control which became handy as the colonies grew, and which had crucial consequences for the continued rule of the elite throughout American history. Along with the very rich and the very poor, there developed a white middle class of small planters, independent farmers, city artisans, who, given small rewards for joining forces with merchants and planters, would be a solid buffer against black slaves, frontier Indians, and very poor whites. The growing cities generated more skilled workers, and the governments cultivated the support of white mechanics by protecting them from the competition of both slaves and free Negroes. >> As early as 1686, the council in New York ordered that "noe Negro or Slave be suffered to work on the bridge as a Porter about any goods either imported or Exported from or into this City." In the southern towns too, white craftsmen and traders were protected from Negro competition. In 1764 the South Carolina legislature prohibited Charleston masters from employing Negroes or other slaves as mechanics or in handicraft trades. Middle-class Americans might be invited to join a new elite by attacks against the corruption of the established rich. The New Yorker Cadwallader Golden, in his Address to the Freeholders in 1747, attacked the wealthy as tax dodgers unconcerned with the welfare of others (although he himself was wealthy) and spoke for the honesty and dependability of "the midling rank of mankind" in whom citizens could best trust "our liberty & Property." >> This was to become a critically important rhetorical device for the rule of the few, who would speak to the many of "our" liberty, "our" property, "our" country.', ">>{bostonscollege} : I wasn't dismissing the original article; it's just food for thought. Income inequality is a huge issue, which is why I commented with that link to broaden the perspective gained. It's also relevant to the original claim because it expands upon it. Hopefully other people find the information pertinent to the discussion.", ">>{ricdesi} : Why? They're giving back almost uncountable sums of money to worthy causes. Are you saying that Bill Gates needs to be dragged out of his bed and beaten in the streets?", '>>{Dassiell} : The global one percent is also different than the US One percent', '>>{Dassiell} : The global one percent is also different than the US One percent', '>>{RebornPastafarian} : The two at the top have given billions. Zuckberburg has said he will give away 90% of his wealth.', ">>{TrumpCardStrategy} : Do you use facebook, or windows? how much value do you get out of it? Let's say there were only 10 people in the world each with $10. One of those 10 people makes a product the other 9 value enough to spend $5 on. The inventor now has much more money than everyone else. But at the sametime everyone else is better off because they enjoy the product.", ">>{2IRRC} : It's completely meaningless. That's something a state could do if they had funds. While their wealth allows them to impact one specific issue no matter how well meaning they are it's impossible to impact everyone everywhere with everything. Also the funds they have grow on its own often driving globalization which further enriches them. This compounds the problem nations have of collecting taxes and providing basic services. On one side they might save 300,000 people by helping to fund medical research in Africa. On the other side their wealth comes at a cost of millions of people with an equal number of problems many of which will die as a result. Wealth is unfortunately a means of survival. Their extreme wealth comes at a cost that can be directly tied back to globalization and government created monopolies due to lobbying efforts and corporate practices which are anti-competitive wherever they are. Chief of those is taxes. The lions share of profits these multi-national companies make is through not paying their taxes. The most simple solution to this is forcing them to pay taxes and back taxes. Yes that would mean confiscating their wealth. A wealth that was never theirs to begin with. It was yours and they stole it.", ">>{KamalaKHAAAAAAAAAN} : Ah but I'm sure these are the 8 hardest-working people in the entire world. EDIT /s, because our world sucks now.", ">>{KamalaKHAAAAAAAAAN} : Cost of living is a thing, dude. You can't compare a suburb in upstate NY to Somalia.", '>>{KamalaKHAAAAAAAAAN} : >But at the sametime everyone else is better off because they enjoy the product. Debatable. Studies show that social media has a pretty bad impact on self-esteem and depression.', '>>{cool_hand_luke} : They seem to be united in fucking over future generations.', '>>{mannabhai} : You yourself are much more richer than thousands of people in developing countries simply because of where you live. Your standard of living is obscene by their standards. Would you give up your standard of living? Now about your standard of living, it comes about because you live in a free market economy with a rule of law. Poorer countries neither have free markets nor a fair rule of law. Additionally, as an Indian, I make less than the US federal minimum wage but I still live a comfortable life in the most expensive city in India. Purchasing power parity is a thing. Inequality is higher between countries instead of within countries.', '>>{mannabhai} : But this is exactly how they got to that number of 8 people being equally wealthy to 3 billion', '>>{veryfry} : >Inequality is higher between countries instead of within countries. Not really. If you compare the bottom and the very top in a single country the difference is usually higher than if comparing the median wealth in a poor and rich country. (Because the richest are so absurdly rich)', ">>{imbobbathefett} : That's funny, they tried using that tactic in an intelligence squared debate and they lost the event. Someone being in the global 1% for making 30k a year is not the same as a CEO that makes 10k per day or per hour.", ">>{Acidics} : Not debatable. If this were true, people wouldn't use it. /close", ">>{ChaoticGoodEconomics} : The expectation that all actors are rational has no bearing on reality. I don't know if this was sarcastic, but you would be wrong if it isn't.", '>>{sdezigns} : The number of times such revolutionary/violent acts have occurred in history is rather small when compared to day to day relative peace of people just surviving, or even living in subjugation. So I suspect the odds are in favour of the status quo, and the rich staying safe behind their high walls.', ">>{Seeker67} : If drugs weren't good for you people wouldn't use them. /close", '>>{egorgian} : So what do you suggest we do? Take the richest 8 men and redistribute their wealth equally among all humans? Congrats now you just made everyone $1 richer and liquidated all of their companies that actually dispense good morality. "Half of the world" comes from poverty stricken countries like Africa where I assume the average american probably holds the net worth combined of 10000 people.', '>>{deck_hand} : If the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, then we should just kill those eight men, confiscate their entire wealth, and double the "net wealth" of the rest of the world. Of course, since half of the world has very, very little wealth to begin with, it would be almost meaningless to them. But it would make the envious much happier.', '>>{deck_hand} : One should not equate wealth with hard work. The world has never worked that way, and will never work that way. In fact, it should not work that way. If it did, then the disabled and elderly who could not longer work at all would be destitute.', '>>{L3SSTH4NTHR33} : People eat delicious fast food that make them feel good for a few minutes but has long term repeated-use side effects of making them fatty-bo-batties', ">>{Acidics} : So they like it. If they didn't like it they wouldn't eat it lol. You're arguing nonsense.", ">>{Acidics} : If drugs didn't have any benefits people wouldn't take them. You're arguing nonsense lol", ">>{Seeker67} : Nobody's saying social medias don't have benefits. You, on the other hand, are saying people wouldn't use them if they had the alleged negative aspects.", '>>{ThrustyMcStab} : Half the world is 375 million people? Gross underestimation, miscalculation, or am I simply missing something about this comment?', ">>{everymananisland} : Terrible statistic. For example, infants born into the world are already richer the moment they take their first breath than a significant percentage of the population that is currently so in debt their income/wealth is negative. And I don't know off the top of my head how much of that negative wealth offsets those above them to start. It'd be more valuable to focus on how to get everyone richer/wealthier, not wring our hands about how much the top has.", '>>{ThrustyMcStab} : Windows is basically a monopoly to most consumers unless they\'re not attached to most standard programs or games (if so get Linux) or buy overpriced products (Apple). Facebook is a digital drug. Or at least it has been proved to be addictive, and it\'s arguably also bad for you as it gathers and sells your personal information and behavior. I use Windows because I\'m a gamer and I don\'t have much of a choice. I only use facebook to stay up to date on family/friends\' events (nobody sends normal invitations any more, leaving facebook would mean being a social pariah at this point). Point is, I don\'t want to use these services. But I hardly have a choice. There are many like me. This puts a big asterisk next to "earned".', '>>{felesroo} : I think the greater problem lies in not who has the money, but the mechanisms by which they became so rich. Lack of taxation, from income to investments, to inheritance, has allowed wealth to explode at the top disproportional to everyone else. Instead of the game getting harder to play, it gets easier. They\'ve "out leveled" the design of capitalism. Their wealth has so much economic gravity that it draws in more and more. It\'s not the individuals that have caused this, though certainly some have contributed through political pressure to get shitty laws passed, but it\'s the lawmakers themselves that cowtow to these interests instead of passing legislation that would level the playing field more. There will always be rich. What society needs to do is strike a balance. It should be very easy to make $1 and almost impossible to make $1 billion. The game should get harder as level increases, not easier. Any game like that breaks. So does society, eventually.', ">>{testa12} : What's this got to do with politics or is this subreddit just going to subvert to flagrant socialist propaganda now rather than at least pretending to hide it?", '>>{tokyoburns} : Dude, I have an Xbox and a cell phone that has Candy Crush and sports highlights. What more could I want?', '>>{everymananisland} : The problem here is that those arguing about inequality being "obscene" have yet to demonstrate that it is, in fact, a problem, never mind a more important one.', ">>{bostonscollege} : No one is arguing against that. Again, the link that I shared is just to give the situation some more perspective. Statistically speaking, I would assume every one of us here is closer to the global top 1% than the bottom 50%. I shared the article so people might be appreciative of their place in the world. The reason was not to write off billionaire's wealth as a non-issue (I said that in the first sentence).", '>>{bostonscollege} : Of course 30k per year and 10k per hour are huge differences--and it\'s sad. The numbers you mentioned put the spotlight on the top 1%, while the ones I mentioned expand it to many more Americans. I\'m just guessing here, but if you have a solid job you\'re probably making more than $1000 every pay period. There are 4-5 countries in Africa (depending on which study you look at) that have per capita GDP\'s of less than $1000, with some nations as low as $600. That\'s a country average for an entire year! You see how well off we are now? The thought I was trying to convey was not that wealth of the super rich wasn\'t a big deal. The first thing that I said in my comment was that it was disheartening. I also said people were right to scrutinize the mega rich. So I\'m not playing for the other side in this debate, I\'m just expanding the conversation. In essence, I\'m providing an even bigger perspective on wealth inequality because I\'m sharing the data that many people neglect. My goal was to make people feel grateful, and to think, "wow, I really am more fortunate than I thought I was." If at any point you thought that, then I see my comment as a success.', '>>{TrumpCardStrategy} : You absolutely have a choice, you are judt abdicating your responsibility in making it to live with your video game addiction.', ">>{ThrustyMcStab} : Yes, between keep using fb or never know when somethings happening. Between using windows or significantly neutering my hobby. That's more blackmail than choice.", '>>{TrumpCardStrategy} : Actually the most recent study out indicates that a "goldilocks" sweet spot exists where too little and too much use are linked with bad outcomes, but moderate use can improve them.', '>>{Sephran} : What a stupid number. If you compare even the richest person in the world, to all the people who make under 10$ a MONTH, of course the number and percentage will be high.', ">>{TrumpCardStrategy} : That's like saying nature blackmails you in eating, sheltering, and clothing yourself.", '>>{everymananisland} : Can you be more specific? Because recent history seems to be showing that greater wealth inequality is not resulting in more stratification, but instead is happening during a time where many are rising out of poverty.', '>>{bostonscollege} : I understand what cost of living is, but I\'m not sure what you\'re trying to say. If you\'re looking at the "property holdings" part of the wealth equation, then you do have a point. However, keep in mind that someone who lives in a New York City apartment had to have the money to buy the expensive apartment in the first place. Just because cost of living is more expensive in some areas than others doesn\'t mean that the equation isn\'t valid. Take upstate New York, for example. The cost of living may be higher than in Somalia, but with that comes better quality of life. In higher income areas, you pay to play. The cost of living is just an indication of how wealthy the populous is and how much is costs to maintain a standard of living. A teacher in New York may pay more for her house than a teacher in Somalia, but where would you rather live? In New York, you\'ll get a good salary, handsome benefits, a nice place to live, etc. You can\'t say the same for Somalia. You raised a decent point, but you can\'t just look at cost of living as an equalizer and then nullifier in the discussion.', ">>{everymananisland} : I have researched the subject. The idea that wealth inequality is a major problem doesn't seem to hold up. Do you have contrary evidence?", ">>{yobsmezn} : [This article](http://www.forbes.com/sites/dalearcher/2013/09/04/could-americas-wealth-gap-lead-to-a-revolt/#7c4cc14da33f) is rich in useful links. It's a few years old and the problem has gotten worse since then, but the data and conclusions hold up.", ">>{everymananisland} : How do they hold up? Again, we're seeing fewer and fewer people in poverty. Wealth inequality is not negatively impacting society. That the wealthy have more is not why the lowest end has less, because wealth is not finite. This article is big on platitudes but actually kind of low on data, and the conclusions come with a lot of assumptions. What, specifically, are you talking about?", ">>{yobsmezn} : You could not have read the article and investigated the links in under 90 seconds, which was the interval before your reply, so I have to assume you're just messing with me.", ">>{everymananisland} : If you think this is the first time I've seen an article originally posted in 2013... So can you answer my questions, or are you going to continue avoiding them?", '>>{KamalaKHAAAAAAAAAN} : ROFL dumbest fuckin argument ever. "People use heroin, therefore making it good to them." Truly an idiotic argument that assumes all people act to their own benefit.', '>>{KamalaKHAAAAAAAAAN} : Let\'s see how far down the "I was never taught logical skills" rabbit-hole goes... Cigarette Smokers too? They like smoking?', ">>{KamalaKHAAAAAAAAAN} : Oh for fuck's sake... Go learn what a cost-benefit analysis is.", ">>{yobsmezn} : I have found a common tactic of conservative commenters is to demand other people do their homework for them. I provide a useful resource, you shrug it off. And so on. If I fail to do the work I'm avoiding your questions. It's refined trollery, but it's still trollery.", '>>{everymananisland} : Well, you made the claim. You backed it up using a poor source, so I asked for clarification. Continuing the discussion is not trolling, nor is asking for reasons why you find it compelling given the critique of the data presented. So can you answer the question?', ">>{Acidics} : You seem to be very lost. Humans have the capability of choosing what they do. If they did not like something, they would not do it. It's simple and your lack of understanding is dangerous.", '>>{KamalaKHAAAAAAAAAN} : Answer my question. Do cigarette smokers *like* smoking?', ">>{KamalaKHAAAAAAAAAN} : He's arguing *on relativity* when the study is just about simple overall worth. Without his introducing that relativist context, COL wouldn't matter here because it doesn't apply to the study. He basically created a new context, under which the study was not conducted.", ">>{Acidics} : Yes. That is why they do it. They enjoy the feeling the cigarette provides them. If they didn't like the feeling they got when they smoked, why would they do it?", '>>{KamalaKHAAAAAAAAAN} : [Sorry to scare you with entirely new concepts...](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Addiction)', ">>{Acidics} : They're addicted because they like the feeling. Confirming what I said before.", '>>{Dassiell} : Yeah but the article acts condescending like "people going against the top 1% don\'t realize they\'re part of it!" But it\'s a different one percent, so that\'s misleading. Boston represent btw'], ['>>{david_walls} : Dobot M1: the affordable desktop robot arm that 3D prints, laser-engraves, solders, and more', '>>{sirbabylon} : Anyone who wants this I say go for it, but please understand that one of the main tenets of 3D printing is that if you fund a kickstarter 3D printer then you are paying to debug the product. That might not be a deal breaker but please keep this in mind.', ">>{LatinGeek} : I'm not sure if I can trust a 3D printing head mounted on a swinging arm, connected to another swinging arm, connected to a linear, vertical motor. But I guess the fact it's a proper manufactured thing and not a Prusa makes the tolerances tighter.", '>>{lilbabymudpies} : Thank you, Space Star Ordering! [Source](https://youtu.be/1ibSaHM_LbM)', ">>{830hobbes} : My lab has a $500,000 professional level 3D printer that we're paying to debug... The thing is awful.", ">>{solarplex} : Wait until it's actually out. Kickstarters look like the creators just keep pouring in more and more money that would be used for production and shipping into making their prototypes a little bit better.", ">>{suspendedbeliever} : Has potential but I've never been convinced by 'do everything' machines. I would far prefer it based around an x, y traditional 3d printer base and just give me laser, router and printer. Will never back anything like this in KS. The product nearly always ends up being lacklustre or non existent.", ">>{Raininazus} : If not, don't look for expensive things and get some money.", ">>{OverWorkedCorpse} : Thats pretty obvious. But unfortunately many people buy above their means even buying stuff they'll never use.", ">>{Potoodles} : I can tell you right now that this platform is poorly optimized (mechanically) for 3d printing. Most 3d printer designs attempt to reduce the amount of mass that moves because the extruder head does a ton of back and forth movements very quickly. We're talking about speeds of 150 mm/s+ or 350 ipm+. I guarantee this thing can't move that fast. Looks good for pick and place though although I cant imagine why the average person would need a one outside a production environment.", ">>{ArticArny} : Looks like a nightmare of debugging and maintenance just waiting to happen. Wouldn't go anywhere near this until it had been out for at least a year or two. Certainly not while it's in the design phase.", ">>{slutty_electron} : Just based on the prevalence of new car purchases I'd say almost half of US households have a spare couple grand but they're already spending it on depreciation and interest.", '>>{Cobaltsaber} : I could see a tech savvy small business owner have use for a few of these. Pay some highschool kid minimum wage to stuff envelopes vs getting a robot to do it all day.', '>>{Cobaltsaber} : The primary target seems to be small business owners and makers. 1k isn\'t pocket change but it\'s certainly "affordable" for what it is.', '>>{SiegeLion1} : Are Prusas that bad? I was considering getting one', '>>{glaurung_} : Unfortunately stuffing envelopes is a lot more complex than pick and place.', ">>{Verdris} : >The robot can be programmed in a number of ways. You can put it into learning mode and you can grab its head and move it around — the robot records the movements and repeats them until it gets bored. So they've invented a masturbation robot. Baby steps, I guess.", '>>{Navil_} : Do you talk about the prusa i3 mk2 or the asia chep ones', '>>{dontbeabsurd} : Not really, as long as you are prepared to do some adjustments. The construction itself is quite robust. I think the reference was to the tolerances of the parts.', '>>{sysadmin001} : Will it jerk me off so I can raid and watch porn at the same time? This is the shit that matters ok, priorities.', '>>{smaugington} : Also this robot costs about $1500. Need atleast 2 to get paper into envelope. 3k or 10/hr for a kid', '>>{OverWorkedCorpse} : Very true. Its also very good for people who design and build their own products.', ">>{iamtherealdylan} : Prusas are actually pretty widely liked in the 3D printing community. They're sort of like what makerbot was before it went closed source and turned to shit", ">>{Terrific_Soporific} : It's also the second iteration of dobot- and people seem to have a lot of [complaints](https://www.reddit.com/r/shittykickstarters/comments/5h7y7d/the_already_overfunded_dobot_m1_robotic_arm_is/) about the first one- which was also a kickstarter.", ">>{iCameToLearnSomeCode} : > 3k or 10/hr for a kid This is a simple math problem, if you have a $3,000 envelope stuffer and you need to stuff as many envelopes as possible (like a coupon mailer or something) then it will pay for itself in two weeks. You would need 3 shifts at $10 per hour stuffing envelops constantly 7 days a week to match the productivity of a mail machine (not that these would make a good mail machine but that's beside my point) it would cost $1,680 per week to do the same amount of work, even if your mail machine had to be replaced monthly only an idiot would hire people instead of buying the robot.", ">>{FirstToBeDamned} : This to me is basically the tech version of No Man's Sky. Backers be weary.", ">>{249ba36000029bbe9749} : I'd like to know if the footage of it in operation are real time or not.", '>>{westbamm} : Not an idiot, but a "nice" person would go for the job creation. But you are right with this simple math.', ">>{LatinGeek} : Prusas are great! If built and calibrated properly they can be some of the most accurate printers out there. That sturdy design, though, is made better by the fact it's a printer with three solid, separate axes. This thing isn't, and building it in the same way you'd build a Prusa would be a nightmare.", '>>{onebit} : The original kickstarter looks like it had some problems. http://www.kckstarter.com/projects/dobot/dobot-robotic-arm-for-everyone-arduino-and-open-so/comments From the comments: * Advertised as open source and source never released * Vendor supplied firmware purportedly has issues * Bad support (add an i to the link)', ">>{alpain} : so the one attachment i don't see is some sort of a subtractive CNC/dremel type attachment, since the laser appears to be for engraving and not actually of cutting strength you'd still need that type of a device i think. maybe it cant handle vibrations to keep it steady enough? or maybe they just didnt want to make one?", ">>{workingBen} : You will need to factor in maintenance costs - the thing is going to need to be fixed now and then. You can't have a tech standing around waiting for it to break or malfunction and then pay for 10 minutes of work. You'll also need to consider how you'll get the materials to the envelope stuffing machine, which may involve more machines and a conveyor belt and someone stocking huge loads of supplies into a hopper that drops on the conveyor belt... and now you have at least one person working on loading supplies and a tech and with a hopper / feeder / belt / stuffer setup you have a lot more points of failure. So how many envelopes do you actually need to stuff? Because here's a [$4600 device](http://www.whitakerbrothers.com/formax-6102-folder-inserter) that will do almost 1400 pieces in an hour. Quick Googling found several others in the couple hundred range that operate at much lower speeds.", ">>{SiegeLion1} : Thats good to hear, I was a bit sceptical with how cheap they were when most 3d printers I've seen people talk about are like £1000+ I know they're not fantastic out of the box, they need a few aftermarket upgrades to make them really good but it's still cheaper than most others.", ">>{SiegeLion1} : Yeah I've heard they only truly stand out with some aftermarket upgrades, mostly stuff to take weight off the extruder so it doesn't wobble around too aggressively.", ">>{234879} : A job that can be replaced by a robot for greater efficiency, should be. We shouldn't keep around bullshit menial labor tasks just to create jobs.", '>>{YourBoyFrodoge} : Calls it "affordable" Actual arm costs $1400', '>>{jglee1236} : Affordable compared to _____ and "affordable (*period*)" are two different things. $1400 is not affordable are you kidding me...', ">>{234879} : What's a good entry-level 3d printer? I'm out of the loop on this one but still interested in getting one at some point", '>>{iamtherealdylan} : Makerbot used to be a driving force in open source 3D printing at one point. Open source, if you don\'t know, means that all of the design files are available to the public, so people can modify their printer and collaborate to make the design better, as well as build their own machine without even buying the parts from Makerbot. At one point, the CEO of Makerbot decided that he wasn\'t Steve Jobs enough. He made the next generation of Makerbots closed source with proprietary software, sleek designs, and mediocre hardware. The new machines were a "fuck you" to the community that fueled Makerbot, and they were aimed more at average consumers who don\'t even want/need an overpriced 3D printer. Applying Apple\'s design philosophy to something as niche as 3D printing was definitely a mistake.', ">>{iamtherealdylan} : I've heard a lot of good things about the [MP Select Mini](http://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=15365) for only $200 and their other printers. The [Prusa i3 printers](http://shop.prusa3d.com/en/3d-printers/59-original-prusa-i3-mk2-kit.html) are very well reviewed as well, but kind of expensive. A lot of Prusa clones (such as Wanhao's) are good as well, as far as I know. You should check out r/3dprinting", '>>{Lost_in_La_Mancha} : Not only the product, sometimes one may be even debugging the project itself...', '>>{classic__schmosby} : > add an i to the link Chrome did it automatically... Kind of cool.', ">>{Elipes_} : You do know how expensive the alternative is don't you?", ">>{PlankWithANailIn} : In order to be able to provide jobs you need customers, but you won't have any due to your service costing 10X the competitions.", ">>{Dongle655} : This whole subreddit posts hyped up things that probably are not smart to invest money into. This and futurology are the two subreddits I see and go oh wow what's the concept destroying fault in this post.", '>>{Cobaltsaber} : The maker in me says all this tech can make small business a lot more feasible and soon everyone will have an Etsy side hustle or freelance. The cynic in me says people are way too lazy to bother.', ">>{830hobbes} : Yeah it has all the bells and whistles. 200W SLS, laser grid scanning, multiple print heads you can load up with pretty much any slurry, UV cure lamp. Problem is, the software and interaction with the hardware is horrific. Half the time the laser didn't work because some machine settings randomly undid themselves. Same for valves. Program crashes a bunch. Pretty half baked for such an expensive machine.", ">>{-FunkyPotato-} : People like you are why I can't find a good farrier.", ">>{PieInTheSky2020} : It's a person that makes horse hooves. I'm guessing that process has been automated and /u/-FunkyPotato- wants a hand crafted horse hoof for his bourgeoisie horse.", ">>{jerseyknit} : Just got the Monoprice Maker Select for about $330 and I've been very impressed. I agree with the other comment, checkout r/3dprinting", ">>{Necro138} : Its a fancy packaged SCARA robot. They're nothing terribly special, and you can find them on eBay all the time. They're used alot in microelectronics manufacturing.", '>>{-FunkyPotato-} : Horse shoes. And this is a joke I make when trying to illustrate ludditism in its many guises. Usually goes about this well.', '>>{PieInTheSky2020} : Lol. I was also joking (I called a horse bourgeoisie).']]

classify and reply

[">>{arizonadeserts} : Dumb article. Hillary's conservative because she doesn't want to start a trade war with china or pull out of NATO? That's called common sense", ">>{eamus_catuli} : >By any reasonable definition, Democrats are now the more conservative of America’s two parties. They are more interested than Republicans in conserving America’s international relationships, cultural norms, and political and economic institutions as they are. Uh...that's not what most people think when they think of Conservatives in the colloquial sense.", '>>{satosaison} : How they became the *little c* conservative party', '>>{anon902503} : They\'re using the Edmund Burke definition of "conservative"', ">>{veridique} : If the Democrats have become the conservative party, what have the Republicans become since they've moved to the extreme right?", '>>{anon902503} : Definitely a Reactionary party. At least since Obama became President.', ">>{ColossalMistake} : It's true. We now have a far right party and a conservative party while the left is totally ignored by those in power.", ">>{Mr_McDonald} : That'll happen when it's a party full of racism.", '>>{thumbprick} : Obergefell, the ACA, some good things have happened. I\'d say "totally ignored" is too much.', '>>{ColossalMistake} : The ACA is basically a means to funnel money to healthcare companies that have to provide almost no level of care.', '>>{thumbprick} : it is an improvement on the previous system where chronically sick people without insurance would be ruined before being left to slowly die between emergency room visits. Preexisting condition, anyone? I believe it provides a basis that can be, and will be, improved on.', '>>{ColossalMistake} : Yes, in the massively complex corporatist law there are a handful of good provisions, I concede that. Raising the age of an eligible dependent to 26 is another. But overall the law is terrible and just funnels money to healthcare and pharmaceutical co.panorama, who actually wrote most of it. They get to sell $350/month plans with $5k annual deductibles and not pay out a dime for almost 96% of people.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{arizonadeserts} : Dumb article. Hillary's conservative because she doesn't want to start a trade war with china or pull out of NATO? That's called common sense", ">>{eamus_catuli} : >By any reasonable definition, Democrats are now the more conservative of America’s two parties. They are more interested than Republicans in conserving America’s international relationships, cultural norms, and political and economic institutions as they are. Uh...that's not what most people think when they think of Conservatives in the colloquial sense.", '>>{satosaison} : How they became the *little c* conservative party', '>>{anon902503} : They\'re using the Edmund Burke definition of "conservative"', ">>{veridique} : If the Democrats have become the conservative party, what have the Republicans become since they've moved to the extreme right?", '>>{anon902503} : Definitely a Reactionary party. At least since Obama became President.', ">>{ColossalMistake} : It's true. We now have a far right party and a conservative party while the left is totally ignored by those in power.", ">>{Mr_McDonald} : That'll happen when it's a party full of racism.", '>>{thumbprick} : Obergefell, the ACA, some good things have happened. I\'d say "totally ignored" is too much.', '>>{ColossalMistake} : The ACA is basically a means to funnel money to healthcare companies that have to provide almost no level of care.', '>>{thumbprick} : it is an improvement on the previous system where chronically sick people without insurance would be ruined before being left to slowly die between emergency room visits. Preexisting condition, anyone? I believe it provides a basis that can be, and will be, improved on.', '>>{ColossalMistake} : Yes, in the massively complex corporatist law there are a handful of good provisions, I concede that. Raising the age of an eligible dependent to 26 is another. But overall the law is terrible and just funnels money to healthcare and pharmaceutical co.panorama, who actually wrote most of it. They get to sell $350/month plans with $5k annual deductibles and not pay out a dime for almost 96% of people.']]

classify and reply

['>>{itneverends32} : Donald Trump is doing exactly what he said he would do', '>>{therecordcorrected} : Trump Tweets Suggest President (Still) Doesn’t Understand How NATO Works', '>>{wraithtek} : > Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) on Thursday declined to commit when asked at a press conference if the Republican plan would allow everyone covered through ObamaCare to remain insured. > “Look, I’m not going to get ahead of our committee process,” Ryan said. “We’re just beginning to put this together.” > He instead called for a system “that gives us access to affordable healthcare in this country without a costly government takeover.” "Health care for some... miniature American flags for others!"', '>>{takeashill_pill} : Except for draining the swamp or locking her up.', '>>{therecordcorrected} : Well first there is [this.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C7K18NyVsAIrzWA.jpg) And of course the new leader of the free world had to give Trump a [lecture.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C7NHLIgXUAAJQfW.jpg)', ">>{somefool} : I wouldn't be surprised if he still fancied that second idea or worse.", '>>{democrazy} : Republican state senator proposes creating new crime of ‘economic terrorism’ aimed at protesters', '>>{moby323} : Secretary Tillerson allows Fox News, excludes others from DMZ meeting', '>>{RAVAGE_MY_ANUS} : on a scale from 1 to /r/politics how triggered were you when trump won the election', '>>{forever_stalone} : If I remember correctly most Trump supporters viewed the wall as a figure of speech not an actual concrete wall spanning 200 miles. They thought he would tighten up security and support the mechanisms for legal immigration. You know, like what normal people think.', '>>{R3aperF4n} : Trump is spitting in the face of foreign policy. As a non-American, I am afraid.', ">>{Megabran} : Nice fake news article! I couldn't be happier that President Trump is doing what he promised.", '>>{knuckle_drag_racer} : ah, the ole libertine spit ball. throw it.', '>>{bickering_fool} : Trump (still) doesn’t understand how his phone works.', ">>{trogon} : > “We’re just beginning to put this together.” It's not like they've had seven years or anything to think about an alternative.", '>>{RyuujinZER0} : Only 1,455 days to go! (Or possibly 2,915 if he _gets relected_)', '>>{Jennica} : And people said Hillary would have been more dangerous and corrupt...', ">>{hwkns} : Trump, personally could give a toss about NATO. It's a pesky wonky issue that's too boring to care about. His advisers, Bannon, and Putin are more motivated to redefine the issue.", '>>{moby323} : I have a feeling this is only going to get worse before it gets better. Between this and Trump only taking questions from right-wing "news" outlets, I think the rest of the media need to get together and come up with a unified plan to address this. For one thing they should make it their top story EVERY time they are excluded. For example the only story the press should be reporting about his trip to the DMZ is that everyone but Fox News was barred.', '>>{weightloss89} : Yes, it would be unpopular among Republicans if it covers non-whites.', '>>{Khan_Shot_First} : He made it very clear over and over that he was talking about building a physical wall spanning the border. He even talked about how to pay for it.', ">>{flosswater} : It's like they want to force us to get our news from the same garbage heap where they get theirs, because they think we'll develop an appetite for garbage. We won't. We don't like garbage.", ">>{Negative_Clank} : I so wish that could happen, but I always get the defeated feeling that the powers-that-be at the top of the company food chain only give a fuck about dollars and keeping the ship sailing straight, with no moral compass plotting their course. If it really begins to damage their bottom line, then maybe? But I don't see that happening soon. I think the reason Breitbart (which I admittedly don't read and don't know much about) is giving a little pushback is how advertising dollars are bleeding", ">>{rk119} : Isn't Fox News the fake news that President Trump threw under the bus yesterday, when he met with Merkle?", '>>{chinchilla-khaleesi} : It wont fix anything and people will literally die when they repeal it.', ">>{Khan_Shot_First} : Wait... so it's fake news that he is doing what he said he would do?", ">>{Megabran} : No, it's alternate facts. As a Trump voter, I couldn't be happier!", '>>{venicerocco} : You\'re spreading - whether you know it or not - Russian created propaganda, spread online by hired "trolls" typing away in St. Petersburg. Whether you yourself were influenced or not is irrelevant. That you share the same beliefs as them is troubling.', ">>{DPlaintiff} : That's because everytime they work out the math they end up with three options: single payer, individual mandate, or people dying in the streets. Obamacare is a pathetic peice of legislation, but without it we would be far worse off.", '>>{mhwtexplode} : republican new code word...economic terrorism = protesting against republicans,', ">>{trogon} : The ACA was definitely a pathetic stopgap. The only option left for the people in power now is #3: dying in the streets. They certainly won't go for #1 or #2.", ">>{Reala27} : It's not an if. People are stupid enough to elect this dipfuck a second time. It will happen .", ">>{jlaux} : He doesn't know how anything works. Let's stop pretending like he has any intelligence.", '>>{dariusorfeed} : There really is no other option and they know it. They\'ll try to make it seem as if they\'re doing something with "cross state line insurance" and "health saving accounts" but at some point people are going to catch on and realize these aren\'t actual solutions. The GOP is in an interesting position. They\'ve been claiming they have solutions for years, now they\'re on the spot and know they have nothing. I don\'t think they ever thought they\'d make it to this point. I\'m not so sure they\'ll be able to blame this one on the dems.', '>>{TheSarcasticPizza} : You and me both friend!!! Look at them REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE', '>>{MostlyCarbonite} : Or people with families who own their own business.', ">>{PotaToss} : That's some fucking contrast in body language. I think Trump understands he's not respected by other world leaders, and he isn't half the leader that Merkel is. Incidentally: https://twitter.com/Susan_Hennessey/status/843264555744681984 >@realDonaldTrump: ...vast sums of money to NATO & the United States must be paid more for the powerful, and very expensive, defense it provides to Germany! >@Susan_Hennessey: Periodic reminder that the only country that has ever invoked NATO Article V—calling others to our collective defense—is the United States. Adding an addendum to her own tweet: > @Susan_Hennessey: This is weirdly/wrongly worded and undercuts the (stronger) point: It was the allies of NATO that invoked Article V in solidarity with us.", '>>{The-Autarkh} : How about we instead create the crime of "willful ignorance of the the First Amendment while holding public office," punishable by having to read said Amendment aloud 10,000 times in the presence of witnesses?', '>>{Infidel8} : The infuriating part is that the GOP was given ample opportunity to help design and improve the bill, but was more intent on obstructing Obama than on helping the American people. Obamacare is substandard largely because they wanted it to be substandard. In fact, the predominant reason that premiums increased was because [Marco Rubio](http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/10/us/politics/marco-rubio-obamacare-affordable-care-act.html?_r=0) placed an item in a 2014 budget law that starved insurers of payments that they have been promised under the ACA.', ">>{Ulthanon} : Of course it won't cover everybody. All they've ever put forward as a solution is vouchers. That shit will get spent in *seconds* in a hospital stay, to say nothing of the poor bastards with chronic health trouble. But hey, I might get a few dollars extra every year come tax season, so I guess the unmitigated pillaging of my countrymen is all gravy. Drill, baby. ^^/s", '>>{thedange75} : Republicans protesting by not holding a confirmation hearing for a Supreme Court nominee to fill a vacant seat should be called Constitutional Terrorism.', ">>{woowoodoc} : He and his supporters are quite literally too stupid to care about that. Nothing can happen that won't reinforce their delusions.", '>>{mracidglee} : FTA: >Mr. Trump may have been referring to the fact that Germany, like most NATO countries, falls short of the alliance’s guideline that each member should allocate 2 percent of its gross domestic product to military spending It seems accurate enough for a Tweet. How would you fit the above in 140 characters?', '>>{Rollakud} : Republicans want to keep the 2nd amendment but abolish the 1st?', '>>{TinyBaron} : Even he knows this course of action is a stupid idea. He knows every other serious news outlet will point that out.', '>>{Girlindaytona} : Trump: Vote for me. What do you have to lose?', ">>{gorillaverdict} : And Trump supporters get behind this. We're two tribes. The cons versus everyone else on the planet. They are the smaller tribe. We need to fucking roll over them", '>>{Enthused_Llama} : Fuck him and fuck Fox News. Everyone else supported them when they threw a shitfit after Obama moved them back a row, but ecluding all the other media is fine with them. Fuck them so hard. They have no interest in freedom or democracy.', '>>{ClaymoreMine} : Pretty sure a federal judge ruled on this the other day. This is unconstitutional and in direct violation of a judges order.', '>>{tr4k1} : He could have a stroke and forget his own name. I guess.', ">>{Cindernubblebutt} : ...just beginning to put this together WTF have you been doing for the last 6 years of while you've been promising to repeal it ? Why the hell did people vote for congressmen who didn't do any of their homework?", '>>{reid8470} : Always amazes me that the GOP will bend over backwards to contest anything that could even remotely be construed as a challenge to the Second Amendment, and then moments later repeatedly seek to undermine the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth.', ">>{Hrym_faxi} : >The decision to exclude a pool reporter from the meeting in the Joint Security Area is the latest blow to press access on Secretary Tillerson's Asia trip. Rather than taking the press corps with him on his trip, as is customary, Tillerson has allowed only a single reporter, Erin McPike, from the center-right publication Independent Journal Review. >Recently, the State Department broke a a six-week hiatus in press briefings, an unusual drought for an agency which traditionally fields questions from reporters on a daily basis. I think it's time we stopped joking about this administration and get serious. We are technically in an ongoing war with North Korea, but currently have managed a fifty year cease fire with them. Yesterday Tillerson sent the first salvo across the DMZ by stating that diplomacy was no longer an option. What you are witnessing now are the black smoke plumes of the war machine's exhaust manifold. As always, the first casualty is the free press. Because we are technically still at war with North Korea the president doesn't need the approval from congress to attack and there is minimal risk to Americans so we aren't likely to protest. However, doing so puts Japan and South Korea under eminent danger of a nuclear strike, and just the thought that our president is willing to risk that in order to shift focus away from his domestic failures should anger everyone. We can't trust this guy to tell us the weather, much less to lead us into war with a nuclear power.", '>>{gonzoparenting} : From now on I will refer to it as Constitutional Terrorism.', ">>{strangeelement} : Do we know if this can apply to diplomatic travel as well? The ruling seemed pretty clear but I would have expected it to be applied immediately to T-Rex's trip if it covers it. This right here definitely goes against the ruling. Or maybe there'll be a delay to apply it fully?", '>>{The-Autarkh} : Maybe repeat offenders could be required to read landmark First Amendement jurisprudence, with a quiz at the end to avoid having to recite the Amendment an additional 10,000 times.', '>>{theartfulcodger} : US courts have no jurisdiction over South Korean sovereign territory, and cannot extend "rights" - be they First Amendment or any other - beyond their own national boundaries. But if Tillerson tries pulling this stuff again once he gets back, he\'ll undoubtedly end up with a big legal problem on his hands - perhaps even charges of contempt.', '>>{007meow} : Fox News may have accidentally become the most powerful conglomerate in the world. If they get exclusive access to important matters AND have the blind trust of the President (who distrusts everyone else), they can shape policy.', ">>{RyanClinton2017} : Germany must hit %2 for NATO to work. Other countries too. (that's only 57 characters there)", '>>{lapone1} : I wish we had a Briebart to do them in like they did to Acorn. They need to go away.', '>>{Beard_o_Bees} : Just dippin a toe in the water of fascism, eh, Doug? Do you like how it feels? Does it make you feel.... manly?', ">>{gullibleboy} : The neocons are getting bored now that our involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq has wound down. Time to start up the war train against North Korea. But this time they don't have to make up a lie about weapons of mass destruction. Now, all they need is a [Gulf of Tonkin incident](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident) to light the match.", ">>{skwirrl} : True, FOX is a very popular outlet for conservatives. But it cannot match the combined reach of CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNBC and many others. Trump can run, but he can't hide. He may have his pet, cloying, saccharine network which lauds his every move, but he will always have legitimate media outlets to check his power and questioning his actions. Thank the good Lord!", '>>{ILikeCutePuppies} : Ask Fox Meaning "Fox will you please spin this for me". Fox didn\'t spin it much although we will see what fox does in the future.', ">>{JusticeMerickGarland} : If it's not a corporation, speech may be regulated.", ">>{QuietGentleman} : He's there acting at the behest of the US government. What the US government does is of public concern. The judge doesn't need to rule on any issues regarding sovereignty because it was a US department official decision that made the exclusion. Whether it was on foreign soil is immaterial because it has nothing to do with sovereignty issues.", ">>{JusticeMerickGarland} : Except when they use the 14th Amendment eloquently to apply the 2nd Amendment to the Chicago gun ban. Read that case and you'll see what I'm talking about. They know *all about* the 14th Amendment, then they apply it when they like the result.", '>>{rk119} : They issued a statement saying they had no evidence to back up the claim made by one of their own do called brilliant legal minds.', '>>{rk119} : They were also asked publicly by PM Trudeau to retract an incorrect headline implicating the Moroccan witness as the sole shooter in the Quebec mosque shooting. Fox News confirmed fake news by: Germany. Sweden. Canada.', '>>{theartfulcodger} : It has *everything* to do with sovereignty issues. Your argument boils down to a complaint that the comportment of a US official visiting South Korea was unseemly. While I agree with you on that point, it has nothing to do with the substantive legal issue of right to access. While a US court may have affirmed that media outlets have a right of equal access within the territories of the USA, that ruling has absolutely no validity outside the nation\'s boundaries - which is where both Tillerson *and* the media pool were at the time. I challenge you to show exactly how media outlets have been extended an equivalent right of equal access to visiting dignitaries by the sovereign government of South Korea. After all, so long as they remain within its territory, the members of the press only have those rights and privileges that their host nation extends to them, and have no legal recourse to the putative "rights" they might have had Stateside. Edit: lot of American hegemonists in this thread, who mistakenly think the First Amendment flows like water onto the soil of foreign nations. Well, it just ain\'t so. The borders of other nations are not porous to the US Constitution; it stops dead in in its tracks at the limits of US territory.', ">>{NemesisPrimev2} : It has been fun in a sense reading what can only be described as pure, unadulterated chaos going on with Trump and his team but those aren't the people I'm worried about. I'm more worried about the people in both the House and Senate. People like the guy in the article are fucking scary.", ">>{NemesisPrimev2} : That sub would just be full of pictures of Ted Cruz. He has a face that makes people wanna punch it. It's confirmed by science.", '>>{karachay} : Trump knows this, hence the whole "I could shoot someone in the midddle of 5th avenue and not lose any ratings".', ">>{Adam_df} : Pretty sure you're totally wrong. You're thinking of the ruling on the travel ban.", '>>{awwwww_snap} : To be clear, is your argument that federal law only applies to federal officials when they are physically standing on US territory?', ">>{JackiePollockBrown} : You aren't even correct that this took place in SK.", '>>{WatchingDonFail} : Can we use this charge against the owners, when they destroy jobs with market failures?', ">>{we_are_fuckin_doomed} : Hey Doug Ericksen, just because nobody invited you to parties in high school doesn't mean you have to take it out on the rest of us.", '>>{theartfulcodger} : Fair question: no. While in SK, Tillererson must comport himself according to both US *and* SK law. But I\'m actually arguing the reverse side of that coin: that any supposed "First Amendment right of equal access" that the recent US court decision granted to the media pool disappeared the moment they entered Korean airspace. So while standing on Korean soil, the press pool had no such First Amendment rights. And while Tillerson is beholden to recognize those rights where and when they exist, in the jurisdiction of the sovereign nation of South Korea, those rights have evaporated, *as has the entire First Amendment*. If, for example, Tillerson visited Beijing, and the Chinese government said, "no press except China State Radio allowed to interview him while he\'s here, everybody else must remain 50 metres away at all times", that\'s what would happen. Their nation, their rules.', '>>{IrishJoe} : Because FUCK the 1st Amendment!!! - the GOP Terrorists!', ">>{classof78} : Normally I'd just up vote, but I have to say it, Good post dude!", ">>{MBAMBA0} : So much for those hoping Tillerson would be the 'voice of sanity' in the Trump WH....", ">>{aiken_} : Terrorism is bad. Protesting is bad (unless it involves a confederate flag or a white hood). Therefore protestors are terrorists. It's actually fairly sophisticated thinking by modern Republican standards.", ">>{pudgyfuck} : It's hard to land a good punch on melting candle wax", ">>{urfriendosvendo} : I can't decide if I want to punch Ted Cruz or indict him on pedophilia.", '>>{theartfulcodger} : Where the heck do you think "the DMZ" *is*? Arizona?', '>>{Adam_df} : That was a case about NYC press credentials. Different parties, different issue.', '>>{Socrates_Burrito} : Well, at least this was proposed in Washington where Democrats control both Houses now.', '>>{atda} : >new crime of “economic terrorism” that would allow felony prosecution of protesters who block streets, cause property damage, threaten jobs and put public safety at risk. So basically make misdemeanors into felonies for your political opponents who will skew younger and to the left. Yup no hidden agenda there.', '>>{Powellwx} : So in love with the 2nd amendment, they skip right over the first.', '>>{LucienLibrarian} : Judge, smudge. Putin said it was a fantastic idea.', '>>{yaosio} : This guy needs to be kicked out of his state legislature. He wants to suppress protests, obviously unconstitutional. Anybody that supports the criminalization of protests is anti-Constitution.', ">>{80s_Teen} : > that any rights US courts grant to the media do not exist beyond the US' national boundaries No. You do not get to violate the constitution just because you are not are not physically in the USA. That is the stupidest argument I've read all week. Arguing that our constitution applies to foreign national governments is comparing apples to oranges.", '>>{nooopts} : Fox and the others allowed into the briefings are becoming state news. This is the beginnings of fascism. It must stop.', '>>{karmature} : This is unconstitutional and violation of American norms and principles. It saddens me to see this unconstitutional/poor behaviour normalised at the highest levels.', '>>{Parrek} : At times it seems like the only amendment they want to keep is the second.', '>>{MistakenForBees} : He actually said "not lose any *voters*", but to be honest, "ratings" sounds more like something he would say.', '>>{mindlessrabble} : The Trump occupation regime is a coup against America and we have to oppose it and remove the occupation from power.', ">>{Sptsjunkie} : Money equal free speech, but actual speech doesn't equal free speech.", '>>{bacononastick} : ["I\'m not a big media press access person. I personally don\'t need it,"](http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/rex-tillerson-says-hes-not-a-big-media-press-access-person/article/2617778) \\- Rex Tillerson', ">>{texum} : It's the zone *between* South Korea and North Korea. It's not either country's land.", ">>{Adama0001} : What about the founding fathers and the tea party? They destroyed property. I don't think protestors should destroy things but wording matters. What about abortion clinic protestors? Blocking health access. So will they be terrorists too?", '>>{0and18} : Hey he was supposed to be one of the "normal" ones right? Right?', '>>{nakkh} : Secret tree fucker is what his future headline will read. These guys always publically oppose what they secretly love.', '>>{boobityskoobity} : While I agree that violent protesting is not the way to go...there are already laws in place about these actions.', '>>{Celtic12} : You just contradicted yourself, because you stated that a US diplomat must act in accordance with US and host nation law, what the US official here is doing is acting in a way that contradicts a US court order thusly acting in contravention of US law.', '>>{InnerMisanthrope} : Well, in a world where bigotry and the acceptance of bigotry are just "economic anxiety", this new phrase will fit right in.', '>>{freecavitycreep} : >Despite the fact that there is no official peace treaty between North Korea and the United States, it\'s not quite correct to say that we\'re at war (even in a technical sense) because, technically, we weren\'t at war to begin with. The 1950-53 conflict was conducted under the aegis of the United Nations and was dubbed a "police action" by President Harry Truman. Congress never actually declared war, nor did it authorize a military engagement. (By contrast, Congress didn\'t declare war in the current conflict with Iraq, but it did authorize the invasion.) http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2009/05/are_we_at_war_with_north_korea.html', ">>{metaobject} : Where do you think they've been getting half of their ideas? Putin wrote this playbook a while ago.", '>>{32LeftatT10} : The right wing conditioned their supporters to not care. That was the point of the projection about "most transparent administration in history" mocking Obama.', '>>{1in6_Will_Be_Lincoln} : Did the same thing with war on drugs. It was the answer to how do we take the right to vote from blacks and hippies.', ">>{OscarMiguelRamirez} : I understand your claim, but I don't accept it as being true. It doesn't make sense that only some arbitrary laws or customs apply on foreign soil.", '>>{liberationation} : Well, the 8th says "cruel AND unusual" not "cruel OR unusual." I think we\'ve got a case here boys…', '>>{TotesNottaBot} : >[Forced exposure therapy...](http://athenacinema.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/CO2.jpg)', '>>{Damean1} : > This is unconstitutional and violation of American norms and principles. How so? Please explain how anyone had their constitutional rights violated.', ">>{Homerpaintbucket} : Wouldn't economic terrorism be more like flying the economy into the housing market and the auto industry, destroying both in a spectacular explosion of fiery doom because your faith in upper class tax cuts being infallible has become your one true religion?", ">>{jaysrapsleafs} : that's right. As an agent of the US government, you must still abide by the constitution abroad. It's not like you can have slaves on some remote island as a representative of American citizens and it be totally fine.", ">>{theartfulcodger} : > That is the stupidest argument I've read all week. Then you should re-read your own. > You do not get to violate the constitution The American Constitution does not apply in Korea, and American reporters *have no First Amendment rights* once they are standing on another nation's soil. The Constitution is not transportable beyond America's borders, and the press pool cannot invoke it, so long as they stand within the jurisdiction of another sovereign nation.", '>>{theartfulcodger} : only some arbitrary laws or customs apply on foreign soil. That\'s the *entire concept* behind the principle of national sovereignty. They\'re not "arbitrary", they\'re *those nation\'s laws*, and they have a right to impose them on all those within their domain. Would you agree that *Iranian law* should apply to certain people within the boundaries of the US? Or do you believe they should be governed exclusively by American law?', ">>{Cindernubblebutt} : Um, endangering people's ability to turn a profit isn't protected by the Constitution. Free speech and assembly is. I guess it's not surprising that Republicans are so eager to trash the constitution because they don't seem to understand it at a fundamental level.", ">>{theartfulcodger} : No, I'm arguing that the American press gallery does not have the same First Amendment rights on Korean soil, that they do on American soil. Those rights disappear the moment they enter a foreign nation, and while it behooves a prominent member of the Administrative Branch to not violate those rights where and when they exist, *in Korea, they no longer exist.*", '>>{factsRcool} : - Freedom = Liberty - Liberty is pursued by liberals. - Libruls r bad. - Freedom is bad', ">>{theartfulcodger} : You have no idea what you're talking about. In fact, *both* countries claim it, because technically they are still at war with each other. But the practical consideration is that South Korean law applies on the south side of the wire, and Northern law on the other. If you think this is wrong, I challenge you to step onto the North Korean side of the DMZ and start handing out bibles. The entire term *Demiltarized Zone* merely means that both sides have agreed not to mass troops within a few kilometres of the dividing line, in order to prevent incidents, and to limit their occupation to guard forces and reconnaissance patrols. It does not mean that no nation's laws apply to it, as you seem to think.", ">>{factsRcool} : Is firing a gun protected under freedom of expression? If it were, we'd suddenly have Republicans taking an interest", ">>{Damean1} : Again, how does that infringe upon anyone's constitutional rights? Your article has nothing at all to do with this article.", '>>{guerisimo} : Rex "never heard the history of the Korean War, doesn\'t understand why we even deal with North Korea\'s shit - must because because Obama was a feckless Communist dictator" Tillerson']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{democrazy} : Republican state senator proposes creating new crime of ‘economic terrorism’ aimed at protesters', '>>{knuckle_drag_racer} : ah, the ole libertine spit ball. throw it.', '>>{mhwtexplode} : republican new code word...economic terrorism = protesting against republicans,', '>>{The-Autarkh} : How about we instead create the crime of "willful ignorance of the the First Amendment while holding public office," punishable by having to read said Amendment aloud 10,000 times in the presence of witnesses?', '>>{thedange75} : Republicans protesting by not holding a confirmation hearing for a Supreme Court nominee to fill a vacant seat should be called Constitutional Terrorism.', '>>{Rollakud} : Republicans want to keep the 2nd amendment but abolish the 1st?', '>>{reid8470} : Always amazes me that the GOP will bend over backwards to contest anything that could even remotely be construed as a challenge to the Second Amendment, and then moments later repeatedly seek to undermine the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth.', '>>{gonzoparenting} : From now on I will refer to it as Constitutional Terrorism.', '>>{The-Autarkh} : Maybe repeat offenders could be required to read landmark First Amendement jurisprudence, with a quiz at the end to avoid having to recite the Amendment an additional 10,000 times.', '>>{Beard_o_Bees} : Just dippin a toe in the water of fascism, eh, Doug? Do you like how it feels? Does it make you feel.... manly?', ">>{JusticeMerickGarland} : If it's not a corporation, speech may be regulated.", ">>{JusticeMerickGarland} : Except when they use the 14th Amendment eloquently to apply the 2nd Amendment to the Chicago gun ban. Read that case and you'll see what I'm talking about. They know *all about* the 14th Amendment, then they apply it when they like the result.", ">>{NemesisPrimev2} : It has been fun in a sense reading what can only be described as pure, unadulterated chaos going on with Trump and his team but those aren't the people I'm worried about. I'm more worried about the people in both the House and Senate. People like the guy in the article are fucking scary.", ">>{NemesisPrimev2} : That sub would just be full of pictures of Ted Cruz. He has a face that makes people wanna punch it. It's confirmed by science.", '>>{WatchingDonFail} : Can we use this charge against the owners, when they destroy jobs with market failures?', ">>{we_are_fuckin_doomed} : Hey Doug Ericksen, just because nobody invited you to parties in high school doesn't mean you have to take it out on the rest of us.", '>>{IrishJoe} : Because FUCK the 1st Amendment!!! - the GOP Terrorists!', ">>{classof78} : Normally I'd just up vote, but I have to say it, Good post dude!", ">>{aiken_} : Terrorism is bad. Protesting is bad (unless it involves a confederate flag or a white hood). Therefore protestors are terrorists. It's actually fairly sophisticated thinking by modern Republican standards.", ">>{pudgyfuck} : It's hard to land a good punch on melting candle wax", ">>{urfriendosvendo} : I can't decide if I want to punch Ted Cruz or indict him on pedophilia.", '>>{Socrates_Burrito} : Well, at least this was proposed in Washington where Democrats control both Houses now.', '>>{atda} : >new crime of “economic terrorism” that would allow felony prosecution of protesters who block streets, cause property damage, threaten jobs and put public safety at risk. So basically make misdemeanors into felonies for your political opponents who will skew younger and to the left. Yup no hidden agenda there.', '>>{Powellwx} : So in love with the 2nd amendment, they skip right over the first.', '>>{yaosio} : This guy needs to be kicked out of his state legislature. He wants to suppress protests, obviously unconstitutional. Anybody that supports the criminalization of protests is anti-Constitution.', '>>{Parrek} : At times it seems like the only amendment they want to keep is the second.', ">>{Sptsjunkie} : Money equal free speech, but actual speech doesn't equal free speech.", ">>{Adama0001} : What about the founding fathers and the tea party? They destroyed property. I don't think protestors should destroy things but wording matters. What about abortion clinic protestors? Blocking health access. So will they be terrorists too?", '>>{nakkh} : Secret tree fucker is what his future headline will read. These guys always publically oppose what they secretly love.', '>>{boobityskoobity} : While I agree that violent protesting is not the way to go...there are already laws in place about these actions.', '>>{InnerMisanthrope} : Well, in a world where bigotry and the acceptance of bigotry are just "economic anxiety", this new phrase will fit right in.', '>>{1in6_Will_Be_Lincoln} : Did the same thing with war on drugs. It was the answer to how do we take the right to vote from blacks and hippies.', '>>{liberationation} : Well, the 8th says "cruel AND unusual" not "cruel OR unusual." I think we\'ve got a case here boys…', ">>{Homerpaintbucket} : Wouldn't economic terrorism be more like flying the economy into the housing market and the auto industry, destroying both in a spectacular explosion of fiery doom because your faith in upper class tax cuts being infallible has become your one true religion?", ">>{Cindernubblebutt} : Um, endangering people's ability to turn a profit isn't protected by the Constitution. Free speech and assembly is. I guess it's not surprising that Republicans are so eager to trash the constitution because they don't seem to understand it at a fundamental level.", '>>{factsRcool} : - Freedom = Liberty - Liberty is pursued by liberals. - Libruls r bad. - Freedom is bad', ">>{factsRcool} : Is firing a gun protected under freedom of expression? If it were, we'd suddenly have Republicans taking an interest"], ['>>{moby323} : Secretary Tillerson allows Fox News, excludes others from DMZ meeting', '>>{moby323} : I have a feeling this is only going to get worse before it gets better. Between this and Trump only taking questions from right-wing "news" outlets, I think the rest of the media need to get together and come up with a unified plan to address this. For one thing they should make it their top story EVERY time they are excluded. For example the only story the press should be reporting about his trip to the DMZ is that everyone but Fox News was barred.', ">>{flosswater} : It's like they want to force us to get our news from the same garbage heap where they get theirs, because they think we'll develop an appetite for garbage. We won't. We don't like garbage.", ">>{Negative_Clank} : I so wish that could happen, but I always get the defeated feeling that the powers-that-be at the top of the company food chain only give a fuck about dollars and keeping the ship sailing straight, with no moral compass plotting their course. If it really begins to damage their bottom line, then maybe? But I don't see that happening soon. I think the reason Breitbart (which I admittedly don't read and don't know much about) is giving a little pushback is how advertising dollars are bleeding", ">>{rk119} : Isn't Fox News the fake news that President Trump threw under the bus yesterday, when he met with Merkle?", ">>{woowoodoc} : He and his supporters are quite literally too stupid to care about that. Nothing can happen that won't reinforce their delusions.", '>>{TinyBaron} : Even he knows this course of action is a stupid idea. He knows every other serious news outlet will point that out.', ">>{gorillaverdict} : And Trump supporters get behind this. We're two tribes. The cons versus everyone else on the planet. They are the smaller tribe. We need to fucking roll over them", '>>{Enthused_Llama} : Fuck him and fuck Fox News. Everyone else supported them when they threw a shitfit after Obama moved them back a row, but ecluding all the other media is fine with them. Fuck them so hard. They have no interest in freedom or democracy.', '>>{ClaymoreMine} : Pretty sure a federal judge ruled on this the other day. This is unconstitutional and in direct violation of a judges order.', ">>{Hrym_faxi} : >The decision to exclude a pool reporter from the meeting in the Joint Security Area is the latest blow to press access on Secretary Tillerson's Asia trip. Rather than taking the press corps with him on his trip, as is customary, Tillerson has allowed only a single reporter, Erin McPike, from the center-right publication Independent Journal Review. >Recently, the State Department broke a a six-week hiatus in press briefings, an unusual drought for an agency which traditionally fields questions from reporters on a daily basis. I think it's time we stopped joking about this administration and get serious. We are technically in an ongoing war with North Korea, but currently have managed a fifty year cease fire with them. Yesterday Tillerson sent the first salvo across the DMZ by stating that diplomacy was no longer an option. What you are witnessing now are the black smoke plumes of the war machine's exhaust manifold. As always, the first casualty is the free press. Because we are technically still at war with North Korea the president doesn't need the approval from congress to attack and there is minimal risk to Americans so we aren't likely to protest. However, doing so puts Japan and South Korea under eminent danger of a nuclear strike, and just the thought that our president is willing to risk that in order to shift focus away from his domestic failures should anger everyone. We can't trust this guy to tell us the weather, much less to lead us into war with a nuclear power.", ">>{strangeelement} : Do we know if this can apply to diplomatic travel as well? The ruling seemed pretty clear but I would have expected it to be applied immediately to T-Rex's trip if it covers it. This right here definitely goes against the ruling. Or maybe there'll be a delay to apply it fully?", '>>{theartfulcodger} : US courts have no jurisdiction over South Korean sovereign territory, and cannot extend "rights" - be they First Amendment or any other - beyond their own national boundaries. But if Tillerson tries pulling this stuff again once he gets back, he\'ll undoubtedly end up with a big legal problem on his hands - perhaps even charges of contempt.', '>>{007meow} : Fox News may have accidentally become the most powerful conglomerate in the world. If they get exclusive access to important matters AND have the blind trust of the President (who distrusts everyone else), they can shape policy.', '>>{lapone1} : I wish we had a Briebart to do them in like they did to Acorn. They need to go away.', ">>{gullibleboy} : The neocons are getting bored now that our involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq has wound down. Time to start up the war train against North Korea. But this time they don't have to make up a lie about weapons of mass destruction. Now, all they need is a [Gulf of Tonkin incident](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident) to light the match.", ">>{skwirrl} : True, FOX is a very popular outlet for conservatives. But it cannot match the combined reach of CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNBC and many others. Trump can run, but he can't hide. He may have his pet, cloying, saccharine network which lauds his every move, but he will always have legitimate media outlets to check his power and questioning his actions. Thank the good Lord!", '>>{ILikeCutePuppies} : Ask Fox Meaning "Fox will you please spin this for me". Fox didn\'t spin it much although we will see what fox does in the future.', ">>{QuietGentleman} : He's there acting at the behest of the US government. What the US government does is of public concern. The judge doesn't need to rule on any issues regarding sovereignty because it was a US department official decision that made the exclusion. Whether it was on foreign soil is immaterial because it has nothing to do with sovereignty issues.", '>>{rk119} : They issued a statement saying they had no evidence to back up the claim made by one of their own do called brilliant legal minds.', '>>{rk119} : They were also asked publicly by PM Trudeau to retract an incorrect headline implicating the Moroccan witness as the sole shooter in the Quebec mosque shooting. Fox News confirmed fake news by: Germany. Sweden. Canada.', '>>{theartfulcodger} : It has *everything* to do with sovereignty issues. Your argument boils down to a complaint that the comportment of a US official visiting South Korea was unseemly. While I agree with you on that point, it has nothing to do with the substantive legal issue of right to access. While a US court may have affirmed that media outlets have a right of equal access within the territories of the USA, that ruling has absolutely no validity outside the nation\'s boundaries - which is where both Tillerson *and* the media pool were at the time. I challenge you to show exactly how media outlets have been extended an equivalent right of equal access to visiting dignitaries by the sovereign government of South Korea. After all, so long as they remain within its territory, the members of the press only have those rights and privileges that their host nation extends to them, and have no legal recourse to the putative "rights" they might have had Stateside. Edit: lot of American hegemonists in this thread, who mistakenly think the First Amendment flows like water onto the soil of foreign nations. Well, it just ain\'t so. The borders of other nations are not porous to the US Constitution; it stops dead in in its tracks at the limits of US territory.', '>>{karachay} : Trump knows this, hence the whole "I could shoot someone in the midddle of 5th avenue and not lose any ratings".', ">>{Adam_df} : Pretty sure you're totally wrong. You're thinking of the ruling on the travel ban.", '>>{awwwww_snap} : To be clear, is your argument that federal law only applies to federal officials when they are physically standing on US territory?', ">>{JackiePollockBrown} : You aren't even correct that this took place in SK.", '>>{theartfulcodger} : Fair question: no. While in SK, Tillererson must comport himself according to both US *and* SK law. But I\'m actually arguing the reverse side of that coin: that any supposed "First Amendment right of equal access" that the recent US court decision granted to the media pool disappeared the moment they entered Korean airspace. So while standing on Korean soil, the press pool had no such First Amendment rights. And while Tillerson is beholden to recognize those rights where and when they exist, in the jurisdiction of the sovereign nation of South Korea, those rights have evaporated, *as has the entire First Amendment*. If, for example, Tillerson visited Beijing, and the Chinese government said, "no press except China State Radio allowed to interview him while he\'s here, everybody else must remain 50 metres away at all times", that\'s what would happen. Their nation, their rules.', ">>{MBAMBA0} : So much for those hoping Tillerson would be the 'voice of sanity' in the Trump WH....", '>>{theartfulcodger} : Where the heck do you think "the DMZ" *is*? Arizona?', '>>{Adam_df} : That was a case about NYC press credentials. Different parties, different issue.', '>>{LucienLibrarian} : Judge, smudge. Putin said it was a fantastic idea.', ">>{80s_Teen} : > that any rights US courts grant to the media do not exist beyond the US' national boundaries No. You do not get to violate the constitution just because you are not are not physically in the USA. That is the stupidest argument I've read all week. Arguing that our constitution applies to foreign national governments is comparing apples to oranges.", '>>{nooopts} : Fox and the others allowed into the briefings are becoming state news. This is the beginnings of fascism. It must stop.', '>>{karmature} : This is unconstitutional and violation of American norms and principles. It saddens me to see this unconstitutional/poor behaviour normalised at the highest levels.', '>>{MistakenForBees} : He actually said "not lose any *voters*", but to be honest, "ratings" sounds more like something he would say.', '>>{mindlessrabble} : The Trump occupation regime is a coup against America and we have to oppose it and remove the occupation from power.', '>>{bacononastick} : ["I\'m not a big media press access person. I personally don\'t need it,"](http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/rex-tillerson-says-hes-not-a-big-media-press-access-person/article/2617778) \\- Rex Tillerson', ">>{texum} : It's the zone *between* South Korea and North Korea. It's not either country's land.", '>>{0and18} : Hey he was supposed to be one of the "normal" ones right? Right?', '>>{Celtic12} : You just contradicted yourself, because you stated that a US diplomat must act in accordance with US and host nation law, what the US official here is doing is acting in a way that contradicts a US court order thusly acting in contravention of US law.', '>>{freecavitycreep} : >Despite the fact that there is no official peace treaty between North Korea and the United States, it\'s not quite correct to say that we\'re at war (even in a technical sense) because, technically, we weren\'t at war to begin with. The 1950-53 conflict was conducted under the aegis of the United Nations and was dubbed a "police action" by President Harry Truman. Congress never actually declared war, nor did it authorize a military engagement. (By contrast, Congress didn\'t declare war in the current conflict with Iraq, but it did authorize the invasion.) http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2009/05/are_we_at_war_with_north_korea.html', ">>{metaobject} : Where do you think they've been getting half of their ideas? Putin wrote this playbook a while ago.", '>>{32LeftatT10} : The right wing conditioned their supporters to not care. That was the point of the projection about "most transparent administration in history" mocking Obama.', ">>{OscarMiguelRamirez} : I understand your claim, but I don't accept it as being true. It doesn't make sense that only some arbitrary laws or customs apply on foreign soil.", '>>{TotesNottaBot} : >[Forced exposure therapy...](http://athenacinema.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/CO2.jpg)', '>>{Damean1} : > This is unconstitutional and violation of American norms and principles. How so? Please explain how anyone had their constitutional rights violated.', ">>{jaysrapsleafs} : that's right. As an agent of the US government, you must still abide by the constitution abroad. It's not like you can have slaves on some remote island as a representative of American citizens and it be totally fine.", ">>{theartfulcodger} : > That is the stupidest argument I've read all week. Then you should re-read your own. > You do not get to violate the constitution The American Constitution does not apply in Korea, and American reporters *have no First Amendment rights* once they are standing on another nation's soil. The Constitution is not transportable beyond America's borders, and the press pool cannot invoke it, so long as they stand within the jurisdiction of another sovereign nation.", '>>{theartfulcodger} : only some arbitrary laws or customs apply on foreign soil. That\'s the *entire concept* behind the principle of national sovereignty. They\'re not "arbitrary", they\'re *those nation\'s laws*, and they have a right to impose them on all those within their domain. Would you agree that *Iranian law* should apply to certain people within the boundaries of the US? Or do you believe they should be governed exclusively by American law?', ">>{theartfulcodger} : No, I'm arguing that the American press gallery does not have the same First Amendment rights on Korean soil, that they do on American soil. Those rights disappear the moment they enter a foreign nation, and while it behooves a prominent member of the Administrative Branch to not violate those rights where and when they exist, *in Korea, they no longer exist.*", ">>{theartfulcodger} : You have no idea what you're talking about. In fact, *both* countries claim it, because technically they are still at war with each other. But the practical consideration is that South Korean law applies on the south side of the wire, and Northern law on the other. If you think this is wrong, I challenge you to step onto the North Korean side of the DMZ and start handing out bibles. The entire term *Demiltarized Zone* merely means that both sides have agreed not to mass troops within a few kilometres of the dividing line, in order to prevent incidents, and to limit their occupation to guard forces and reconnaissance patrols. It does not mean that no nation's laws apply to it, as you seem to think.", ">>{Damean1} : Again, how does that infringe upon anyone's constitutional rights? Your article has nothing at all to do with this article.", '>>{guerisimo} : Rex "never heard the history of the Korean War, doesn\'t understand why we even deal with North Korea\'s shit - must because because Obama was a feckless Communist dictator" Tillerson'], ['>>{itneverends32} : Donald Trump is doing exactly what he said he would do', '>>{takeashill_pill} : Except for draining the swamp or locking her up.', ">>{somefool} : I wouldn't be surprised if he still fancied that second idea or worse.", '>>{RAVAGE_MY_ANUS} : on a scale from 1 to /r/politics how triggered were you when trump won the election', '>>{forever_stalone} : If I remember correctly most Trump supporters viewed the wall as a figure of speech not an actual concrete wall spanning 200 miles. They thought he would tighten up security and support the mechanisms for legal immigration. You know, like what normal people think.', ">>{Megabran} : Nice fake news article! I couldn't be happier that President Trump is doing what he promised.", '>>{RyuujinZER0} : Only 1,455 days to go! (Or possibly 2,915 if he _gets relected_)', '>>{Jennica} : And people said Hillary would have been more dangerous and corrupt...', '>>{Khan_Shot_First} : He made it very clear over and over that he was talking about building a physical wall spanning the border. He even talked about how to pay for it.', ">>{Khan_Shot_First} : Wait... so it's fake news that he is doing what he said he would do?", ">>{Megabran} : No, it's alternate facts. As a Trump voter, I couldn't be happier!", '>>{venicerocco} : You\'re spreading - whether you know it or not - Russian created propaganda, spread online by hired "trolls" typing away in St. Petersburg. Whether you yourself were influenced or not is irrelevant. That you share the same beliefs as them is troubling.', ">>{Reala27} : It's not an if. People are stupid enough to elect this dipfuck a second time. It will happen .", '>>{TheSarcasticPizza} : You and me both friend!!! Look at them REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE'], ['>>{therecordcorrected} : Trump Tweets Suggest President (Still) Doesn’t Understand How NATO Works', '>>{therecordcorrected} : Well first there is [this.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C7K18NyVsAIrzWA.jpg) And of course the new leader of the free world had to give Trump a [lecture.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C7NHLIgXUAAJQfW.jpg)', '>>{R3aperF4n} : Trump is spitting in the face of foreign policy. As a non-American, I am afraid.', '>>{bickering_fool} : Trump (still) doesn’t understand how his phone works.', ">>{hwkns} : Trump, personally could give a toss about NATO. It's a pesky wonky issue that's too boring to care about. His advisers, Bannon, and Putin are more motivated to redefine the issue.", ">>{jlaux} : He doesn't know how anything works. Let's stop pretending like he has any intelligence.", ">>{PotaToss} : That's some fucking contrast in body language. I think Trump understands he's not respected by other world leaders, and he isn't half the leader that Merkel is. Incidentally: https://twitter.com/Susan_Hennessey/status/843264555744681984 >@realDonaldTrump: ...vast sums of money to NATO & the United States must be paid more for the powerful, and very expensive, defense it provides to Germany! >@Susan_Hennessey: Periodic reminder that the only country that has ever invoked NATO Article V—calling others to our collective defense—is the United States. Adding an addendum to her own tweet: > @Susan_Hennessey: This is weirdly/wrongly worded and undercuts the (stronger) point: It was the allies of NATO that invoked Article V in solidarity with us.", '>>{mracidglee} : FTA: >Mr. Trump may have been referring to the fact that Germany, like most NATO countries, falls short of the alliance’s guideline that each member should allocate 2 percent of its gross domestic product to military spending It seems accurate enough for a Tweet. How would you fit the above in 140 characters?', '>>{tr4k1} : He could have a stroke and forget his own name. I guess.', ">>{RyanClinton2017} : Germany must hit %2 for NATO to work. Other countries too. (that's only 57 characters there)"], ['>>{wraithtek} : > Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) on Thursday declined to commit when asked at a press conference if the Republican plan would allow everyone covered through ObamaCare to remain insured. > “Look, I’m not going to get ahead of our committee process,” Ryan said. “We’re just beginning to put this together.” > He instead called for a system “that gives us access to affordable healthcare in this country without a costly government takeover.” "Health care for some... miniature American flags for others!"', ">>{trogon} : > “We’re just beginning to put this together.” It's not like they've had seven years or anything to think about an alternative.", '>>{weightloss89} : Yes, it would be unpopular among Republicans if it covers non-whites.', '>>{chinchilla-khaleesi} : It wont fix anything and people will literally die when they repeal it.', ">>{DPlaintiff} : That's because everytime they work out the math they end up with three options: single payer, individual mandate, or people dying in the streets. Obamacare is a pathetic peice of legislation, but without it we would be far worse off.", ">>{trogon} : The ACA was definitely a pathetic stopgap. The only option left for the people in power now is #3: dying in the streets. They certainly won't go for #1 or #2.", '>>{dariusorfeed} : There really is no other option and they know it. They\'ll try to make it seem as if they\'re doing something with "cross state line insurance" and "health saving accounts" but at some point people are going to catch on and realize these aren\'t actual solutions. The GOP is in an interesting position. They\'ve been claiming they have solutions for years, now they\'re on the spot and know they have nothing. I don\'t think they ever thought they\'d make it to this point. I\'m not so sure they\'ll be able to blame this one on the dems.', '>>{MostlyCarbonite} : Or people with families who own their own business.', '>>{Infidel8} : The infuriating part is that the GOP was given ample opportunity to help design and improve the bill, but was more intent on obstructing Obama than on helping the American people. Obamacare is substandard largely because they wanted it to be substandard. In fact, the predominant reason that premiums increased was because [Marco Rubio](http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/10/us/politics/marco-rubio-obamacare-affordable-care-act.html?_r=0) placed an item in a 2014 budget law that starved insurers of payments that they have been promised under the ACA.', ">>{Ulthanon} : Of course it won't cover everybody. All they've ever put forward as a solution is vouchers. That shit will get spent in *seconds* in a hospital stay, to say nothing of the poor bastards with chronic health trouble. But hey, I might get a few dollars extra every year come tax season, so I guess the unmitigated pillaging of my countrymen is all gravy. Drill, baby. ^^/s", '>>{Girlindaytona} : Trump: Vote for me. What do you have to lose?', ">>{Cindernubblebutt} : ...just beginning to put this together WTF have you been doing for the last 6 years of while you've been promising to repeal it ? Why the hell did people vote for congressmen who didn't do any of their homework?"]]

classify and reply

['>>{armadillo198} : Just came to the iPhone SE from a Nexus 5...', ">>{majnus} : Nexus 5 lasted you two full days? Had one of those, one of the worst batteries in Android phones so I'm gonna say you're full of shit. I'm a super light user and nexus 5 pulled barely ONE full day.", '>>{Pvt_Wierzbowski} : Are you saying the SE lasted you 2 days, or your Nexus lasted 2 days?', ">>{Dirk-Killington} : Mine runs all day for normal use. Might need a charge in the evening if I'm going to play a game that is processor heavy.", '>>{marsovec} : how do you like the se overall bro? problems with the smaller screen? lower resolution? ios? performance comparison?', ">>{heyyoudvd} : He's saying he engaged in a 2 day long session of titty fucking.", ">>{armadillo198} : It takes a bit to get used to but overall I'm absolutely in love with it.", ">>{Yo_2T} : I came from a Nexus 5 too and it's nice not having to watch the battery gauge all the time. I can actually go to work on the second day when it's at 45% and get off work 8 hours later at 40%. Just ridiculous.", ">>{majnus} : It's hard to understand what he wrote to be honest.", '>>{TheKingInTheNorth98} : I went from a Nexus 5 to a 6s plus.. I never knew battery lives like this existed', ">>{JustThall} : Enjoy the transition period. I remember when I jumped ship from Nexus5 to iphone6 I had the same feeling about battery life. Like you don't need to charge your phone in the car at all anymore. After 800+ cycles on the battery and loss of ~30% of battery capacity iphone is still a usable phone", ">>{84awkm} : >What the everliving actual titty fuck is this battery life? Basically it's the screen. It takes a shit load more power to run a 1080p or higher screen. If you can manage with it on a lower brightness setting you'll give yourself a further win.", ">>{JukeboxJohnny} : I went from a 6+ to an SE last month, and while I know I'm going to only be using this phone until the new one comes out (it's a work phone), it's a huge change for me at least. I loved my Nexus 5, and while I really thought it was the perfect size, and would make sense to get the 6, I got a 6+ instead. Fast forward a year and a half, it took a dump, and the SE was my cheapest option for now. I have no issues with the SE aside from the size, but I knew that going into it. Battery life and performance have been great. I really want to try out the 7 (not 7+), but having all that screen space was glorious.", '>>{Bronsonite} : I had the z3c before I dropped it and switched to se. The screen on time for the z3c averages 6 hours for me but the stand by is unpredictable.', '>>{AZwildcatsNT} : same exact transition i made, I felt like Hops from Zootopia when she first saw the big city', '>>{flockmann} : and you didnt even mention how much better ios is compared to android', ">>{ohnoitsryan} : Exactly. It's nice to have at least one thing over Android.", ">>{HighExplosives12} : Both phones are arguably the best examples of phones running their respective OS's.", ">>{BringOnTheSnow} : Try it with low battery mode on you'll prolly jizz", ">>{Sega32X} : Something must be wrong with mine. When I leave the house it's 100%. I'm in low power mode why the time I get home.", ">>{BringOnTheSnow} : Every morning I turn it on. I'm using it 99 percent of the time. Only thing I've noticed is it turns your screen off faster, lessens the amount of time it fetches mail but everything else works perfect and I have not noticed performance slow downs. Mind you this is with a 5s not even a se", '>>{burlow44} : It does make me wonder, does android have anything that "I never knew existed"?', ">>{Isunova} : I also just got the 64GB SE a couple days ago, after using Android for the last two years. I initially thought the smaller screen would be an issue, but I got used to it right away. The phone is a *lot* snappier; apps work much better (ie Snapchat), and the battery life is just incredible. It's now 4:45pm; I've been on my phone since around 10am, listening to Spotify, watching videos, and Redditing. My battery is at 76%, when on my Galaxy it would be in the low 50s by now. However, I used to also have an iPhone 4S for about two some odd years. Getting used to the SE was easy. It took me back to my 4S days :p", ">>{Isunova} : It's better in some regards, like stability and snappiness. Android still kicks ios's ass in terms of customizability and openness. I'm going to miss having global Facebook messenger chat heads and the file Explorer.", ">>{dkreeg} : I also went from Nexus 5 to SE about two weeks ago. I can't believe how much better the battery life is on the SE. I easily get two full days without any problem. The Google apps I did install run great--maybe even better.", '>>{burlow44} : Har har. I gladly trade "choice" for a lot of other stuff', '>>{Jinxyface} : My Nexus 6P lasts almost two days for me. Sounds like he was just good at draining the battery.', ">>{NewReddit101} : Two major features of my Galaxy S6 that are keeping me from going back to iPhone are the IR blaster (with built-in, easily configurable, universal remote control app) and the physical 'back' button at the bottom of the phone. I constantly have the desire to go back to iOS, but I would so miss these two features!", ">>{burlow44} : Maybe, but it also wouldn't suprise me if you would get around 3 days +/- with the 6s+", '>>{3y3-000} : All the apps I\'ve used have a back button so not sure the use of an actual "back" button...🤔', ">>{NewReddit101} : I said back button at the *bottom* of the phone :) It's great for one-handed operation because it is fast and it prevents me from having to adjust my grip to reach the back button", ">>{linus121} : I have a Nexus 6P and it entirely depends on your usage. But, when the CPU is running identical workloads, I've noticed my SE edges out my 6P. The 810 isn't a very efficient CPU.", ">>{Jinxyface} : I will agree that the 810 isnt the best. Though your SE is also pushing a much smaller resolution. If my 2560X1440 phone can match your SE in terms of battert while I'm pushing a 1440p resolution, that talks more about the 6P", '>>{Starkid1987} : I think mail fetch is disabled in low battery mode. Only comes when you manually request it.', ">>{linus121} : The Note 5 also pushes QHD and is significantly better in identical workloads. The 6P suffers from having a low binned inefficient Note 4 panel. Couple that with the 810 and in comparison to other phablets. The 6P doesn't compare in the battery department.", ">>{Jinxyface} : Yeah, I know the 6P doesn't use a top end panel. No other phone besides Samsungs really do. But my point is, if a 2560x1440p phone using a known inefficient CPU can match the battery life of a 1136x640 phone...that's really only showing how bad the battery life of the iPhone SE is.", ">>{linus121} : Never mind the SE. The 6P's battery life isn't as great. Not to mention, the battery sizes are proportional to their displays so you can make a comparison to the both. Also, there are top end displays not made by Samsung.", ">>{Jinxyface} : I've never found anyone with bad battery life on a 6P. Even on a very heavy usage day I still get like 5.5-6 hours of SoT at 75% brightness. Could it be better? Sure. But when my friend's new Note 5 barely gets 3 hours of SoT...", ">>{linus121} : You and your friend aren't the same people. You guys don't do the same things on your phones. That's why I said 'when doing identical workloads'. It's funny that you mention that which further proves my point of you guys not having the same usage because the Note 5 has a more efficient CPU and display.", '>>{Jinxyface} : Define identical workloads? Because 90% of people use phones to browse Facebook. If you\'re talking about doing identical tests down to measuring identical seconds doing identical tasks, that\'s not really a good measurement either considering "50%" brightness on two phones aren\'t the same brightness. Among other things.', ">>{linus121} : Not everyone uses their phone for Facebook, no one person has identical usage. Some people use their phones a lot, some use them only for a bit. What are you talking about 'among other things'? Tests like those exist. It's when the brightness is raised to a certain threshold, maybe 100 nits and then are benchmarked to see their performance. Why do you think people value Anandtech reviews so much? They do tests like that. Also, I took my phone off the charger at 5 AM for work, listened to music for 2 hours (streamed), and then listened to locally stored music for another hour. Talked on the phone for one hour, got on Reddit, Snapchat and Appy Geek for 45 minutes. Afterwards, listened to music again and had a FaceTime call for 30 minutes. Used my phone for Uber and various other things. Ended the day with 10% by bedtime. Brightness is set to auto, bottom line is, my usage isn't yours and your friends isn't yours. That's exactly what I mean when I say 'identical workloads'. If '90% of people used their phones to browse facebook' was true. We wouldn't have a huge amount of variation to battery life."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{armadillo198} : Just came to the iPhone SE from a Nexus 5...', ">>{majnus} : Nexus 5 lasted you two full days? Had one of those, one of the worst batteries in Android phones so I'm gonna say you're full of shit. I'm a super light user and nexus 5 pulled barely ONE full day.", '>>{Pvt_Wierzbowski} : Are you saying the SE lasted you 2 days, or your Nexus lasted 2 days?', ">>{Dirk-Killington} : Mine runs all day for normal use. Might need a charge in the evening if I'm going to play a game that is processor heavy.", '>>{marsovec} : how do you like the se overall bro? problems with the smaller screen? lower resolution? ios? performance comparison?', ">>{heyyoudvd} : He's saying he engaged in a 2 day long session of titty fucking.", ">>{armadillo198} : It takes a bit to get used to but overall I'm absolutely in love with it.", ">>{Yo_2T} : I came from a Nexus 5 too and it's nice not having to watch the battery gauge all the time. I can actually go to work on the second day when it's at 45% and get off work 8 hours later at 40%. Just ridiculous.", ">>{majnus} : It's hard to understand what he wrote to be honest.", '>>{TheKingInTheNorth98} : I went from a Nexus 5 to a 6s plus.. I never knew battery lives like this existed', ">>{JustThall} : Enjoy the transition period. I remember when I jumped ship from Nexus5 to iphone6 I had the same feeling about battery life. Like you don't need to charge your phone in the car at all anymore. After 800+ cycles on the battery and loss of ~30% of battery capacity iphone is still a usable phone", ">>{84awkm} : >What the everliving actual titty fuck is this battery life? Basically it's the screen. It takes a shit load more power to run a 1080p or higher screen. If you can manage with it on a lower brightness setting you'll give yourself a further win.", ">>{JukeboxJohnny} : I went from a 6+ to an SE last month, and while I know I'm going to only be using this phone until the new one comes out (it's a work phone), it's a huge change for me at least. I loved my Nexus 5, and while I really thought it was the perfect size, and would make sense to get the 6, I got a 6+ instead. Fast forward a year and a half, it took a dump, and the SE was my cheapest option for now. I have no issues with the SE aside from the size, but I knew that going into it. Battery life and performance have been great. I really want to try out the 7 (not 7+), but having all that screen space was glorious.", '>>{Bronsonite} : I had the z3c before I dropped it and switched to se. The screen on time for the z3c averages 6 hours for me but the stand by is unpredictable.', '>>{AZwildcatsNT} : same exact transition i made, I felt like Hops from Zootopia when she first saw the big city', '>>{flockmann} : and you didnt even mention how much better ios is compared to android', ">>{ohnoitsryan} : Exactly. It's nice to have at least one thing over Android.", ">>{HighExplosives12} : Both phones are arguably the best examples of phones running their respective OS's.", ">>{BringOnTheSnow} : Try it with low battery mode on you'll prolly jizz", ">>{Sega32X} : Something must be wrong with mine. When I leave the house it's 100%. I'm in low power mode why the time I get home.", ">>{BringOnTheSnow} : Every morning I turn it on. I'm using it 99 percent of the time. Only thing I've noticed is it turns your screen off faster, lessens the amount of time it fetches mail but everything else works perfect and I have not noticed performance slow downs. Mind you this is with a 5s not even a se", '>>{burlow44} : It does make me wonder, does android have anything that "I never knew existed"?', ">>{Isunova} : I also just got the 64GB SE a couple days ago, after using Android for the last two years. I initially thought the smaller screen would be an issue, but I got used to it right away. The phone is a *lot* snappier; apps work much better (ie Snapchat), and the battery life is just incredible. It's now 4:45pm; I've been on my phone since around 10am, listening to Spotify, watching videos, and Redditing. My battery is at 76%, when on my Galaxy it would be in the low 50s by now. However, I used to also have an iPhone 4S for about two some odd years. Getting used to the SE was easy. It took me back to my 4S days :p", ">>{Isunova} : It's better in some regards, like stability and snappiness. Android still kicks ios's ass in terms of customizability and openness. I'm going to miss having global Facebook messenger chat heads and the file Explorer.", ">>{dkreeg} : I also went from Nexus 5 to SE about two weeks ago. I can't believe how much better the battery life is on the SE. I easily get two full days without any problem. The Google apps I did install run great--maybe even better.", '>>{burlow44} : Har har. I gladly trade "choice" for a lot of other stuff', '>>{Jinxyface} : My Nexus 6P lasts almost two days for me. Sounds like he was just good at draining the battery.', ">>{NewReddit101} : Two major features of my Galaxy S6 that are keeping me from going back to iPhone are the IR blaster (with built-in, easily configurable, universal remote control app) and the physical 'back' button at the bottom of the phone. I constantly have the desire to go back to iOS, but I would so miss these two features!", ">>{burlow44} : Maybe, but it also wouldn't suprise me if you would get around 3 days +/- with the 6s+", '>>{3y3-000} : All the apps I\'ve used have a back button so not sure the use of an actual "back" button...🤔', ">>{NewReddit101} : I said back button at the *bottom* of the phone :) It's great for one-handed operation because it is fast and it prevents me from having to adjust my grip to reach the back button", ">>{linus121} : I have a Nexus 6P and it entirely depends on your usage. But, when the CPU is running identical workloads, I've noticed my SE edges out my 6P. The 810 isn't a very efficient CPU.", ">>{Jinxyface} : I will agree that the 810 isnt the best. Though your SE is also pushing a much smaller resolution. If my 2560X1440 phone can match your SE in terms of battert while I'm pushing a 1440p resolution, that talks more about the 6P", '>>{Starkid1987} : I think mail fetch is disabled in low battery mode. Only comes when you manually request it.', ">>{linus121} : The Note 5 also pushes QHD and is significantly better in identical workloads. The 6P suffers from having a low binned inefficient Note 4 panel. Couple that with the 810 and in comparison to other phablets. The 6P doesn't compare in the battery department.", ">>{Jinxyface} : Yeah, I know the 6P doesn't use a top end panel. No other phone besides Samsungs really do. But my point is, if a 2560x1440p phone using a known inefficient CPU can match the battery life of a 1136x640 phone...that's really only showing how bad the battery life of the iPhone SE is.", ">>{linus121} : Never mind the SE. The 6P's battery life isn't as great. Not to mention, the battery sizes are proportional to their displays so you can make a comparison to the both. Also, there are top end displays not made by Samsung.", ">>{Jinxyface} : I've never found anyone with bad battery life on a 6P. Even on a very heavy usage day I still get like 5.5-6 hours of SoT at 75% brightness. Could it be better? Sure. But when my friend's new Note 5 barely gets 3 hours of SoT...", ">>{linus121} : You and your friend aren't the same people. You guys don't do the same things on your phones. That's why I said 'when doing identical workloads'. It's funny that you mention that which further proves my point of you guys not having the same usage because the Note 5 has a more efficient CPU and display.", '>>{Jinxyface} : Define identical workloads? Because 90% of people use phones to browse Facebook. If you\'re talking about doing identical tests down to measuring identical seconds doing identical tasks, that\'s not really a good measurement either considering "50%" brightness on two phones aren\'t the same brightness. Among other things.', ">>{linus121} : Not everyone uses their phone for Facebook, no one person has identical usage. Some people use their phones a lot, some use them only for a bit. What are you talking about 'among other things'? Tests like those exist. It's when the brightness is raised to a certain threshold, maybe 100 nits and then are benchmarked to see their performance. Why do you think people value Anandtech reviews so much? They do tests like that. Also, I took my phone off the charger at 5 AM for work, listened to music for 2 hours (streamed), and then listened to locally stored music for another hour. Talked on the phone for one hour, got on Reddit, Snapchat and Appy Geek for 45 minutes. Afterwards, listened to music again and had a FaceTime call for 30 minutes. Used my phone for Uber and various other things. Ended the day with 10% by bedtime. Brightness is set to auto, bottom line is, my usage isn't yours and your friends isn't yours. That's exactly what I mean when I say 'identical workloads'. If '90% of people used their phones to browse facebook' was true. We wouldn't have a huge amount of variation to battery life."]]

classify and reply

[">>{ktownhero} : Why are people defending the attack of a first responder? It's almost like the Black Lives Matters movement has no clear purpose and reaches into self defeating territory... Or maybe it's exactly like that. Blinders are blinders even if it's a movement with good intentions.", '>>{goldenplanetjuice} : Hacked email shows Clinton’s team pushing a negative story about Bernie Sanders’s appearance at posh fundraiser.', '>>{kybarnet} : Sanders said the protests by his brother’s supporters have been “very affecting” because of the “enormous amount of love” they’ve shown for his brother.', ">>{radewagon} : They are attacking it because the law isn't necessary. First responders are already protected by laws. Calling any attack on them a hate crime seems kind of a stretch that doesn't do any real good.", ">>{Parad0x76} : If you hacked Conway's email, I suspect you'd find negative things about Hillary. It's almost like that's part of a campaign manager's job...", ">>{kybarnet} : He was pissed that the DNC had Tulsi replace Nina for his introduction speech. Nina is an exceedingly powerful speaker, too powerful to be on camera, at this stage. And she would not endorse Hillary. Her speech would of been straight fire, but instead they only allowed Tulsi. Tulsi had a great speech, but she is more a 'work from within' person than a 'break and rebuild' challenger.", '>>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Oh no, this is bad folks! Politicians never try to out maneuver the competition. I think we need to elect a creepy rapist pedophile instead', '>>{lord_stryker} : Completely agree. Nina is a fire breather. I love her.', '>>{goldenplanetjuice} : Good point, but I still think behavior like this is worth talking about.', ">>{ktownhero} : >They are attacking it because the law isn't necessary. First responders are already protected by laws. Calling any attack on them a hate crime seems kind of a stretch that doesn't do any real good. Well maybe if people didn't resist arrest and attack them it wouldn't be on the menu? That's a pretty common theme among most police violence instances. You can't ask for a police force that is able to enforce via less violent means and simultaneously argue that we should go easy on people that turn benign situations into violent struggles.", '>>{yobsmezn} : 2013 called. It wants its racist talking points back', '>>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Until we have ranked voting in this country - it kinda does', '>>{GWS2004} : This behavior is nothing new, what exactly is there to talk about?', ">>{NedSanders} : >enormous amounts of love Like when they instantly turn on him and call him a sell out establishment shill because he doesn't want to burn the whole party to the ground out of butthurt? That enormous love?", ">>{2IRRC} : IIRC Tulsi and Nina were both supposed to be there and I'm not sure which one was actually supposed to do the nomination and the seconding. I thought it was interchangeable but then none of that mattered when they banned Nina.", ">>{Mol-lurker} : And I bet Weaver sent emails advising to attack Hillary with her paid speeches. It's a political campaign.", '>>{jusjerm} : That guy mentioned race exactly 0 times in his comment', ">>{yobsmezn} : That's the whole point, Sparky. That's the genius of the thing.", ">>{ktownhero} : You know nothing about me and race wasn't even in the discussion. That's what we call ignorance and prejudice. Mirrors are useful, but calling everyone a racist that you disagree with isn't.", ">>{VacationAwayFromWork} : Jeff Weaver publicly called her a money launderer. Let's not pretend that elections are friendly.", ">>{ktownhero} : >That's the whole point, Sparky. That's the genius of the thing. The only thing demonstrated is that you prejudge people and are incapable of having a meaningful discussion. And that you don't know what racism actually means, but you do find it useful to use arbitrarily to try to discredit others. And that's what we call ignorance and immaturity.", ">>{ktownhero} : >So is resisting arrest a hate crime? I'm not sure I'd agree that it is though it could be in certain cases. But I do understand why they would want to attempt to classify it as such that doesn't involve some evil conspiracy.", '>>{fukdisaccount} : They want to do it because they have a Boner for "the LAW"', '>>{ktownhero} : Believing in what? Intelligence? Communication? Yeah, I\'ll "believe" in those. I don\'t have a problem with you disagreeing, I have a problem with you not being capable or caring to discuss it intelligently and relying on ignorance instead. Calling someone racist is serious and yet you belittle it by slinging it around to serve your own selfish, uninteresting needs. While race was never part of this discussion, you\'ve managed to paint yourself as ignorant, uninformed and decidedly belittling of the very nature of real racism. Good job. You should be embarrassed.', ">>{kybarnet} : Ya basically. Tulsi essentially slammed her on war but supported the party. Nina was (probably) going to slam her on policing and wages, and support values. Tulsi's 'future' is likely as a cabinet member, or to run as Senator or Governor. Nina sees herself running for President, IMO, and that's why they cut her off. Her speeches are always about building for the future.", ">>{FatLadySingin} : Hack email shows Bernie's team pushing negative story about.... It's called a campaign. SO..... again, manufactured outrage... meh.", ">>{VioletBeauregard} : Anything more aggressive than singing Kumbayah around a campfire means Hillary is evil. This seems to fit rather well into a weird thread of narrative I've seen before that seems to really think that Hillary should have stood aside and let Bernie have it, because...why, exactly? I'll tell ya, the (hinted) suggestion that a woman should step aside for a man instead of striving for her own goals really really doesn't sit well with me.", '>>{ktownhero} : >They want to do it because they have a Boner for "the LAW" New York City has a $15 toll to enter. Do they charge it to make money or is that only the side effect of trying to reduce the amount of traffic? That\'s the idea here. They likely want to do what they can to deter people from acting violently toward first responders (which isn\'t only police, btw). Whether it\'s the right way to go about it is a healthy debate but claiming it\'s some evil conspiracy isn\'t. It\'s not even an interesting way to approach the discussion because all it does is shut down the entire thing.', ">>{2IRRC} : Oh I can see that totally. Nina getting banned is one of the first broadsides against the left wing of the party before war is even declared. She is arguably enemy #1 or #2 behind Sanders. Bill did the exact same thing to prominent black left wing supporters as POTUS. Hell he did that during speeches at the WH just to drive it home for his moderate conservative supporters. It's what arguably won him the WH... besides the corrupt electioneering always going on in the background.", '>>{rush42} : I upvoted every one of your comments. You are exactly correct. The issue here is protecting first responders, and turning this into a racial issue is a liberal strategy promoting divisiveness.', ">>{kybarnet} : The most abusive case was when he got a $12 / hr Black worker on welfare, mother, to support and cut the ribbon that kicked 40 Million people off welfare. It seemed at the time like she could barely enunciate the speech she was given. To anyone watching, it was obvious who lowly the Democrats viewed Black people. Of all the people, of all the Black community leaders, they just picked one off the street, and got her up there instead, because to them: Blacks only care if it's from a Black mouth, and You can always find a Black to do anything. The Clinton's have been very, very derogatory, but that's nothing new really. In the South, Hillary will not let the Blacks attend events with the Whites. She calls them 'fundraisers', but if you're in the South, you know what's up. It has long been the policy to give a free speech for the blacks, and closed door speech for the whites. It's been that way for 20 years.", '>>{fukdisaccount} : So you think people who resist arrest have taken the time to consider the penalty?', '>>{ktownhero} : >I upvoted every one of your comments. You are exactly correct. The issue here is protecting first responders, and turning this into a racial issue is a liberal strategy promoting divisiveness. Thanks I appreciate it. I\'m what one would probably classify as a "liberal" (socially) but I\'m still capable of making my own decisions and having real discussions. I think what I think not what someone told me to regurgitate. These people that have hijacked liberal ideals are really hurting us all.', ">>{Sharpspoonoo} : Too bad the Clinton campaign ultimately didn't do that.", ">>{2IRRC} : IIRC she later said she didn't fully realize the implication of what she was doing and was against it calling it a mistake and something she never should have done. That didn't make front page in the MSM. It barely got mentioned during the media shitshow leading up to NY and Cali. No followup either.", ">>{VioletBeauregard} : I'd love to know why you feel this way. Seriously. edit: downvoting a sincere question? What purpose does that serve?", '>>{P0NYP0UNDER} : I like how you guys use the old "this is how politics is done, get over it" line when defending your gal\'s behavior with people who despise politics as usual. A desire to change our political system into a less toxic and dysfunctional one was a major factor in why Bernie was and is better liked than Clinton and why he killed Trump in the polls. You\'re really just that clueless about how silly that defense is, aren\'t you?', '>>{hoirizon} : The only difference being that, you know, those are relevant. But who cares about relevancy when you can push false equivalency using half the amount of brain cells!?', ">>{ktownhero} : >So you think people who resist arrest have taken the time to consider the penalty? You're going to have to clarify the point you are trying to make.", ">>{kybarnet} : Oh totally, but you knew that from the start. I mean Bill put up a person who could (clearly) barely read. I had no doubt her 'expertise' on whether or not the 500 (or what not) page welfare reform bill did not extend beyond her color and motherhood. And you are correct, just FYI, she regretted being up there, but it's not her fault. It's a shame a President would coerce someone less powerful than themselves into a compromising position... but that's Bill for ya.", ">>{Captain_Clark} : You're like a guy who was born and lived his entire life on the Death Star who thinks that he can vote the Empire away. And you call those who understand this clueless. You can't vote the empire away. It's the empire's voting system. Understand?", '>>{SomeStupidJerk} : But in the Sanders\' people\'s minds, that would be perfectly ok. Because they somehow think that a career politician and long term senator isn\'t "playing politics." They actually believe Sanders\' political persona is legit, but every other career politician is a liar and a fake. In other words, a leak of Sanders email would be about a million times more hilarious than Clinton\'s.', ">>{saturninus} : Bernie was less-liked than my gal by close to 4 million Democrats. He polls well among the sanctimonious though, I'll grant you that. I love how he skates free from any suggestion of impropriety, meanwhile loudly condemning anyone who dares to suggest that there better ways to achieve political goals. Somehow, he's even in the right and she's in the wrong when she chooses not to attack an apparent hypocrisy.", '>>{eneguekered} : Obviously, attacking first responders bad. The problem is that "resisting arrest" is subjective. Remember those videos of police manhandling those black kids at that pool or aggressively arresting that guy sitting on his mom\'s porch? Imagine being in that situation, getting upset and pushing back an overly aggressive cop. Now, even though you didn\'t do anything, you\'re guilty of a hate crime.', '>>{yobsmezn} : Okay, you don\'t actually give a damn, but I\'ll break it down. Sorry to interrupt the backslapping with Rush there. When you say \'resisting arrest\' and \'attacking the police\', you\'re calling back the \'thugs\' argument, that black people are out of control savages who spend their time preying on cops. An actual liberal would be well aware of this. "If he only didn\'t resist arrest" overlooks the fact that many black people die in police custody, or are brutalized. Look it up: how many arrest resisters were shot in the back? While in handcuffs? And why were they arrested? It\'s entirely possible to reject violence against law enforcement and at the same time acknowledge that black Americans are targeted for exceptionally harsh and often lethal treatment by law enforcement. If you were a black man and an agitated cop was shrieking at you to get your hands up when they were already up, or to stop resisting arrest when you\'re already on the ground with his knee in your back, you\'d know why the "why can\'t these people just *comply*?" argument is a popular racist straw man tactic.', '>>{fukdisaccount} : Your argument that harsh penalties deter crime is only true for premeditated crime, which is why Texas still has one of the higher murder rates despite having the most executions.', ">>{ktownhero} : >Your argument that harsh penalties deter crime is only true for premeditated crime, which is why Texas still has one of the higher murder rates despite having the most executions. That's a great point but I do think there are people who look for opportunities to fight with police and use resisting arrest as an excuse.", '>>{ktownhero} : >Okay, you don\'t actually give a damn, but I\'ll break it down. Sorry to interrupt the backslapping with Rush there. >When you say \'resisting arrest\' and \'attacking the police\', you\'re calling back the \'thugs\' argument, that black people are out of control savages who spend their time preying on cops. An actual liberal would be well aware of this. "If he only didn\'t resist arrest" overlooks the fact that many black people die in police custody, or are brutalized. Look it up: how many arrest resisters were shot in the back? While in handcuffs? And why were they arrested? >It\'s entirely possible to reject violence against law enforcement and at the same time acknowledge that black Americans are targeted for exceptionally harsh and often lethal treatment by law enforcement. >If you were a black man and an agitated cop was shrieking at you to get your hands up when they were already up, or to stop resisting arrest when you\'re already on the ground with his knee in your back, you\'d know why the "why can\'t these people just *comply*?" argument is a popular racist straw man tactic. I appreciate getting a real response. While this is a better response, it\'s still fundamentally rife with assumptions and accusations about me personally which simply are irrelevant, let alone incorrect. So can we stop with slinging accusations about my character or what you think I do or do not know ? It\'s uninteresting. Anyway, I never brought up race and never though of race specifically. I only mentioned Black Lives Matter because that\'s what the title mentioned. All mentions of race in this conversation are from you and your apparent desire to assume racism where there\'s disagreement. Again, can we just stop with that ? Now, down to the real discussion. It is absolutely true that there are crappy cops out there that do terrible things. There are people who have been flat-out victimized by them. But there are also many great cops and first responders who have been victimized by criminals. And there are also times where violence erupts as a reaction to an implied fear of what someone may do when not complying with instruction. And there are people who look at arrests as an opportunity to fight with police. There will always be bad apples. They aren\'t relevant to this discussion. The discussion is about whether it would be appropriate to classify violence against a responder as a hate crime. Mind you, this is in large part sparked by the Black Lives Matter movement because it has had huge sects of it either defending the resistance of arrest or actively calling for violence against police. That is more than just "bad apples", that is an uncomfortably pervasive message within the movement that had lost track of the real issue which is that both police and communities need to work with one another, not oppose one another. This is a common phenomena of extreme leftist movements. It starts with people losing the message in causing a rift within the movement and ends with the movement fighting itself. And, in the meantime, it causes others who don\'t identify with the movement to be defensive and take equally proportional action against it. This type of legislature is that reaction, because first responders have a great deal to fear in the current climate. The idea of hate is simple: you assume things about a group of people you don\'t know and for no reason other than they belong to said group. It is entirely reasonable for one to consider "first responders" as a group who is at risk of hate crimes. So, with that said, there is an entirely reasonable argument to be made about attacks on first responders being hate crimes based both on the current political climate and the fact that they are judged as a group, not as individuals by many. Has nothing to do with race. This is how you have discussions. Like, I understand your position when you make it clear; but I don\'t fully agree with it. But ideas should be discussed, not dismissed, whether you think they are good or bad, smart or stupid. The idea that everyone with a different position is "racist", -- especially when race isn\'t even involved -- merely shuts down conversation rather than encourages intellectual growth. This is a very serious problem we are facing in this country especially at the university level. It\'s every bit as anti-intellectual as the goofballs believing fake news because it suits their ideals.', '>>{Smoy} : Why are black lives matter protesting? There are already laws to protect minorities. See the double standard?', ">>{darwinn_69} : Because the laws aren't evenly applied. See the difference?", '>>{radewagon} : What does that have to do with labeling something as a hate crime? That label should have criteria that are far less broad than what seems to have been proposed.', '>>{radewagon} : But why call the new attacks hate crimes? Even with protections for minorities, crimes against minorities do not automatically become hate crimes. The crime has to be of a specific nature to be labeled as such. So, no double standard here.', ">>{Smoy} : How are they not evenly applied? I'm pretty sure anyone who attacks a minority because of their minority status is charged with a hate crime."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{ktownhero} : Why are people defending the attack of a first responder? It's almost like the Black Lives Matters movement has no clear purpose and reaches into self defeating territory... Or maybe it's exactly like that. Blinders are blinders even if it's a movement with good intentions.", ">>{radewagon} : They are attacking it because the law isn't necessary. First responders are already protected by laws. Calling any attack on them a hate crime seems kind of a stretch that doesn't do any real good.", ">>{ktownhero} : >They are attacking it because the law isn't necessary. First responders are already protected by laws. Calling any attack on them a hate crime seems kind of a stretch that doesn't do any real good. Well maybe if people didn't resist arrest and attack them it wouldn't be on the menu? That's a pretty common theme among most police violence instances. You can't ask for a police force that is able to enforce via less violent means and simultaneously argue that we should go easy on people that turn benign situations into violent struggles.", '>>{yobsmezn} : 2013 called. It wants its racist talking points back', '>>{jusjerm} : That guy mentioned race exactly 0 times in his comment', ">>{yobsmezn} : That's the whole point, Sparky. That's the genius of the thing.", ">>{ktownhero} : You know nothing about me and race wasn't even in the discussion. That's what we call ignorance and prejudice. Mirrors are useful, but calling everyone a racist that you disagree with isn't.", ">>{ktownhero} : >That's the whole point, Sparky. That's the genius of the thing. The only thing demonstrated is that you prejudge people and are incapable of having a meaningful discussion. And that you don't know what racism actually means, but you do find it useful to use arbitrarily to try to discredit others. And that's what we call ignorance and immaturity.", ">>{ktownhero} : >So is resisting arrest a hate crime? I'm not sure I'd agree that it is though it could be in certain cases. But I do understand why they would want to attempt to classify it as such that doesn't involve some evil conspiracy.", '>>{fukdisaccount} : They want to do it because they have a Boner for "the LAW"', '>>{ktownhero} : Believing in what? Intelligence? Communication? Yeah, I\'ll "believe" in those. I don\'t have a problem with you disagreeing, I have a problem with you not being capable or caring to discuss it intelligently and relying on ignorance instead. Calling someone racist is serious and yet you belittle it by slinging it around to serve your own selfish, uninteresting needs. While race was never part of this discussion, you\'ve managed to paint yourself as ignorant, uninformed and decidedly belittling of the very nature of real racism. Good job. You should be embarrassed.', '>>{ktownhero} : >They want to do it because they have a Boner for "the LAW" New York City has a $15 toll to enter. Do they charge it to make money or is that only the side effect of trying to reduce the amount of traffic? That\'s the idea here. They likely want to do what they can to deter people from acting violently toward first responders (which isn\'t only police, btw). Whether it\'s the right way to go about it is a healthy debate but claiming it\'s some evil conspiracy isn\'t. It\'s not even an interesting way to approach the discussion because all it does is shut down the entire thing.', '>>{rush42} : I upvoted every one of your comments. You are exactly correct. The issue here is protecting first responders, and turning this into a racial issue is a liberal strategy promoting divisiveness.', '>>{fukdisaccount} : So you think people who resist arrest have taken the time to consider the penalty?', '>>{ktownhero} : >I upvoted every one of your comments. You are exactly correct. The issue here is protecting first responders, and turning this into a racial issue is a liberal strategy promoting divisiveness. Thanks I appreciate it. I\'m what one would probably classify as a "liberal" (socially) but I\'m still capable of making my own decisions and having real discussions. I think what I think not what someone told me to regurgitate. These people that have hijacked liberal ideals are really hurting us all.', ">>{ktownhero} : >So you think people who resist arrest have taken the time to consider the penalty? You're going to have to clarify the point you are trying to make.", '>>{eneguekered} : Obviously, attacking first responders bad. The problem is that "resisting arrest" is subjective. Remember those videos of police manhandling those black kids at that pool or aggressively arresting that guy sitting on his mom\'s porch? Imagine being in that situation, getting upset and pushing back an overly aggressive cop. Now, even though you didn\'t do anything, you\'re guilty of a hate crime.', '>>{yobsmezn} : Okay, you don\'t actually give a damn, but I\'ll break it down. Sorry to interrupt the backslapping with Rush there. When you say \'resisting arrest\' and \'attacking the police\', you\'re calling back the \'thugs\' argument, that black people are out of control savages who spend their time preying on cops. An actual liberal would be well aware of this. "If he only didn\'t resist arrest" overlooks the fact that many black people die in police custody, or are brutalized. Look it up: how many arrest resisters were shot in the back? While in handcuffs? And why were they arrested? It\'s entirely possible to reject violence against law enforcement and at the same time acknowledge that black Americans are targeted for exceptionally harsh and often lethal treatment by law enforcement. If you were a black man and an agitated cop was shrieking at you to get your hands up when they were already up, or to stop resisting arrest when you\'re already on the ground with his knee in your back, you\'d know why the "why can\'t these people just *comply*?" argument is a popular racist straw man tactic.', '>>{fukdisaccount} : Your argument that harsh penalties deter crime is only true for premeditated crime, which is why Texas still has one of the higher murder rates despite having the most executions.', ">>{ktownhero} : >Your argument that harsh penalties deter crime is only true for premeditated crime, which is why Texas still has one of the higher murder rates despite having the most executions. That's a great point but I do think there are people who look for opportunities to fight with police and use resisting arrest as an excuse.", '>>{ktownhero} : >Okay, you don\'t actually give a damn, but I\'ll break it down. Sorry to interrupt the backslapping with Rush there. >When you say \'resisting arrest\' and \'attacking the police\', you\'re calling back the \'thugs\' argument, that black people are out of control savages who spend their time preying on cops. An actual liberal would be well aware of this. "If he only didn\'t resist arrest" overlooks the fact that many black people die in police custody, or are brutalized. Look it up: how many arrest resisters were shot in the back? While in handcuffs? And why were they arrested? >It\'s entirely possible to reject violence against law enforcement and at the same time acknowledge that black Americans are targeted for exceptionally harsh and often lethal treatment by law enforcement. >If you were a black man and an agitated cop was shrieking at you to get your hands up when they were already up, or to stop resisting arrest when you\'re already on the ground with his knee in your back, you\'d know why the "why can\'t these people just *comply*?" argument is a popular racist straw man tactic. I appreciate getting a real response. While this is a better response, it\'s still fundamentally rife with assumptions and accusations about me personally which simply are irrelevant, let alone incorrect. So can we stop with slinging accusations about my character or what you think I do or do not know ? It\'s uninteresting. Anyway, I never brought up race and never though of race specifically. I only mentioned Black Lives Matter because that\'s what the title mentioned. All mentions of race in this conversation are from you and your apparent desire to assume racism where there\'s disagreement. Again, can we just stop with that ? Now, down to the real discussion. It is absolutely true that there are crappy cops out there that do terrible things. There are people who have been flat-out victimized by them. But there are also many great cops and first responders who have been victimized by criminals. And there are also times where violence erupts as a reaction to an implied fear of what someone may do when not complying with instruction. And there are people who look at arrests as an opportunity to fight with police. There will always be bad apples. They aren\'t relevant to this discussion. The discussion is about whether it would be appropriate to classify violence against a responder as a hate crime. Mind you, this is in large part sparked by the Black Lives Matter movement because it has had huge sects of it either defending the resistance of arrest or actively calling for violence against police. That is more than just "bad apples", that is an uncomfortably pervasive message within the movement that had lost track of the real issue which is that both police and communities need to work with one another, not oppose one another. This is a common phenomena of extreme leftist movements. It starts with people losing the message in causing a rift within the movement and ends with the movement fighting itself. And, in the meantime, it causes others who don\'t identify with the movement to be defensive and take equally proportional action against it. This type of legislature is that reaction, because first responders have a great deal to fear in the current climate. The idea of hate is simple: you assume things about a group of people you don\'t know and for no reason other than they belong to said group. It is entirely reasonable for one to consider "first responders" as a group who is at risk of hate crimes. So, with that said, there is an entirely reasonable argument to be made about attacks on first responders being hate crimes based both on the current political climate and the fact that they are judged as a group, not as individuals by many. Has nothing to do with race. This is how you have discussions. Like, I understand your position when you make it clear; but I don\'t fully agree with it. But ideas should be discussed, not dismissed, whether you think they are good or bad, smart or stupid. The idea that everyone with a different position is "racist", -- especially when race isn\'t even involved -- merely shuts down conversation rather than encourages intellectual growth. This is a very serious problem we are facing in this country especially at the university level. It\'s every bit as anti-intellectual as the goofballs believing fake news because it suits their ideals.', '>>{Smoy} : Why are black lives matter protesting? There are already laws to protect minorities. See the double standard?', ">>{darwinn_69} : Because the laws aren't evenly applied. See the difference?", '>>{radewagon} : What does that have to do with labeling something as a hate crime? That label should have criteria that are far less broad than what seems to have been proposed.', '>>{radewagon} : But why call the new attacks hate crimes? Even with protections for minorities, crimes against minorities do not automatically become hate crimes. The crime has to be of a specific nature to be labeled as such. So, no double standard here.', ">>{Smoy} : How are they not evenly applied? I'm pretty sure anyone who attacks a minority because of their minority status is charged with a hate crime."], ['>>{kybarnet} : Sanders said the protests by his brother’s supporters have been “very affecting” because of the “enormous amount of love” they’ve shown for his brother.', ">>{kybarnet} : He was pissed that the DNC had Tulsi replace Nina for his introduction speech. Nina is an exceedingly powerful speaker, too powerful to be on camera, at this stage. And she would not endorse Hillary. Her speech would of been straight fire, but instead they only allowed Tulsi. Tulsi had a great speech, but she is more a 'work from within' person than a 'break and rebuild' challenger.", '>>{lord_stryker} : Completely agree. Nina is a fire breather. I love her.', ">>{NedSanders} : >enormous amounts of love Like when they instantly turn on him and call him a sell out establishment shill because he doesn't want to burn the whole party to the ground out of butthurt? That enormous love?", ">>{2IRRC} : IIRC Tulsi and Nina were both supposed to be there and I'm not sure which one was actually supposed to do the nomination and the seconding. I thought it was interchangeable but then none of that mattered when they banned Nina.", ">>{kybarnet} : Ya basically. Tulsi essentially slammed her on war but supported the party. Nina was (probably) going to slam her on policing and wages, and support values. Tulsi's 'future' is likely as a cabinet member, or to run as Senator or Governor. Nina sees herself running for President, IMO, and that's why they cut her off. Her speeches are always about building for the future.", ">>{2IRRC} : Oh I can see that totally. Nina getting banned is one of the first broadsides against the left wing of the party before war is even declared. She is arguably enemy #1 or #2 behind Sanders. Bill did the exact same thing to prominent black left wing supporters as POTUS. Hell he did that during speeches at the WH just to drive it home for his moderate conservative supporters. It's what arguably won him the WH... besides the corrupt electioneering always going on in the background.", ">>{kybarnet} : The most abusive case was when he got a $12 / hr Black worker on welfare, mother, to support and cut the ribbon that kicked 40 Million people off welfare. It seemed at the time like she could barely enunciate the speech she was given. To anyone watching, it was obvious who lowly the Democrats viewed Black people. Of all the people, of all the Black community leaders, they just picked one off the street, and got her up there instead, because to them: Blacks only care if it's from a Black mouth, and You can always find a Black to do anything. The Clinton's have been very, very derogatory, but that's nothing new really. In the South, Hillary will not let the Blacks attend events with the Whites. She calls them 'fundraisers', but if you're in the South, you know what's up. It has long been the policy to give a free speech for the blacks, and closed door speech for the whites. It's been that way for 20 years.", ">>{2IRRC} : IIRC she later said she didn't fully realize the implication of what she was doing and was against it calling it a mistake and something she never should have done. That didn't make front page in the MSM. It barely got mentioned during the media shitshow leading up to NY and Cali. No followup either.", ">>{kybarnet} : Oh totally, but you knew that from the start. I mean Bill put up a person who could (clearly) barely read. I had no doubt her 'expertise' on whether or not the 500 (or what not) page welfare reform bill did not extend beyond her color and motherhood. And you are correct, just FYI, she regretted being up there, but it's not her fault. It's a shame a President would coerce someone less powerful than themselves into a compromising position... but that's Bill for ya."], ['>>{goldenplanetjuice} : Hacked email shows Clinton’s team pushing a negative story about Bernie Sanders’s appearance at posh fundraiser.', ">>{Parad0x76} : If you hacked Conway's email, I suspect you'd find negative things about Hillary. It's almost like that's part of a campaign manager's job...", '>>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Oh no, this is bad folks! Politicians never try to out maneuver the competition. I think we need to elect a creepy rapist pedophile instead', '>>{goldenplanetjuice} : Good point, but I still think behavior like this is worth talking about.', '>>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Until we have ranked voting in this country - it kinda does', '>>{GWS2004} : This behavior is nothing new, what exactly is there to talk about?', ">>{Mol-lurker} : And I bet Weaver sent emails advising to attack Hillary with her paid speeches. It's a political campaign.", ">>{VacationAwayFromWork} : Jeff Weaver publicly called her a money launderer. Let's not pretend that elections are friendly.", ">>{FatLadySingin} : Hack email shows Bernie's team pushing negative story about.... It's called a campaign. SO..... again, manufactured outrage... meh.", ">>{VioletBeauregard} : Anything more aggressive than singing Kumbayah around a campfire means Hillary is evil. This seems to fit rather well into a weird thread of narrative I've seen before that seems to really think that Hillary should have stood aside and let Bernie have it, because...why, exactly? I'll tell ya, the (hinted) suggestion that a woman should step aside for a man instead of striving for her own goals really really doesn't sit well with me.", ">>{Sharpspoonoo} : Too bad the Clinton campaign ultimately didn't do that.", ">>{VioletBeauregard} : I'd love to know why you feel this way. Seriously. edit: downvoting a sincere question? What purpose does that serve?", '>>{P0NYP0UNDER} : I like how you guys use the old "this is how politics is done, get over it" line when defending your gal\'s behavior with people who despise politics as usual. A desire to change our political system into a less toxic and dysfunctional one was a major factor in why Bernie was and is better liked than Clinton and why he killed Trump in the polls. You\'re really just that clueless about how silly that defense is, aren\'t you?', '>>{hoirizon} : The only difference being that, you know, those are relevant. But who cares about relevancy when you can push false equivalency using half the amount of brain cells!?', ">>{Captain_Clark} : You're like a guy who was born and lived his entire life on the Death Star who thinks that he can vote the Empire away. And you call those who understand this clueless. You can't vote the empire away. It's the empire's voting system. Understand?", '>>{SomeStupidJerk} : But in the Sanders\' people\'s minds, that would be perfectly ok. Because they somehow think that a career politician and long term senator isn\'t "playing politics." They actually believe Sanders\' political persona is legit, but every other career politician is a liar and a fake. In other words, a leak of Sanders email would be about a million times more hilarious than Clinton\'s.', ">>{saturninus} : Bernie was less-liked than my gal by close to 4 million Democrats. He polls well among the sanctimonious though, I'll grant you that. I love how he skates free from any suggestion of impropriety, meanwhile loudly condemning anyone who dares to suggest that there better ways to achieve political goals. Somehow, he's even in the right and she's in the wrong when she chooses not to attack an apparent hypocrisy."]]

classify and reply

['>>{roodyroody} : Yes of course the Russians rigged the election for Hillary. Ohh wait no I guess this is media damage control in effect.', ">>{nightrhyme} : Iphone 6s battery life. Wow. The tests weren't lying", ">>{nightrhyme} : That is what I keep reading. But what I'm telling you is that the difference is really noticeable when you come from a 6 to a 6s. Which it shouldn't be", ">>{DatDeLorean} : Contrary to what some have claimed, battery life on a 6S can be worse than a 6. It has a smaller battery capacity and whilst it's more energy efficient that's more relevant for standby than active states. I doubt it's because the CPU is manufactured by company A instead of company B.", ">>{EoinODuffy_} : It's like 1955 again and there is red scare propaganda.", '>>{Pippkorn} : Yeah the battery really is something else. In a negative way.', ">>{Im_100percent_human} : Women's March On Washington 2017: What Happened To Canadians Trying To Attend Protest?", '>>{Lixard52} : The Judge Trump Keeps Insulting Once Had A Cartel Boss Put A Hit On Him', ">>{BebopRocksteady82} : He's in La Raza, I think Trump has a point here", '>>{Im_100percent_human} : Are we going to restrict tourism only to those that are pro-Trump? What are the implications of turning away those that simply disagree with the US President?', '>>{nightrhyme} : As shown in this video the 6 has a better battery life than the 6s(samsung) but worse than the 6s(TSMC) so the 6s actually has the potential to be more energy efficient than the 6 even with a smaller battery. And this under heavy load. Mine also runs very hot as noticed in this video. https://youtu.be/TbBCjcco67I?t=2m12s', '>>{Richafod} : So many more questions surround the content on the email than do where the hacks came from.', ">>{Bush--did911} : You don't know what being a fascist is all about", '>>{nightrhyme} : Yes. I wish I had taken the reports seriously.', '>>{squaqua} : This has been posted before. Letting people into the country who are admittedly entering for the sole purpose of protesting our government is patently stupid.', ">>{nightrhyme} : So to anyone considering upgrading from 6 to 6s and trying to make an informed decision about this chipgate thing and being told that it's a non issue in real world usage. Don't believe it. It is much more noticeable than apple wants you to know", '>>{anonuisance} : What are the implications of inviting every foreigner to come protest our government?', '>>{JoshuaZ1} : He\'s associated with the La Raza Lawyers Association. They aren\'t the same as the National Council of La Raza. And Trump never brought any claim about La Raza, rather Trump just kept repeating that Judge Curiel was "Mexican" despite being born in the US. This is bigotry on Trump\'s part, pure and simple.', '>>{FookYu315} : And what excuse do you have cooked up for his comments regarding a Muslim judge?', '>>{xahnel} : New answers point to that time Russians bought Hillary to get uranium. KGB SOP: once you bribe someone, you own them. Why would Russia sabotage a chance to put someone they own in the White House?', '>>{cooperred} : Odds are, you just have a bad chip. You can\'t make the generalization that "all Samsung chips are bad." If you build PCs of any kind, you\'ve heard about the silicon lottery. That\'s just as much of a thing in phone chips as well. https://www.wired.com/2015/10/iphone-6s-a9-battery-life/', '>>{goethean} : > * [The New York Times reports today](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/25/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-emails.html?_r=0), “[R]esearchers have concluded that the national committee was breached by two Russian intelligence agencies, which were the same attackers behind previous Russian cyberoperations at the White House, the State Department and the Joint Chiefs of Staff last year. And metadata from the released emails suggests that the documents passed through Russian computers….. Whether the thefts were ordered by Mr. Putin, or just carried out by apparatchiks who thought they might please him, is anyone’s guess.” > * [The Washington Post reported overnight](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clinton-campaign--and-some-cyber-experts--say-russia-is-behind-email-release/2016/07/24/5b5428e6-51a8-11e6-bbf5-957ad17b4385_story.html), “In the past 24 hours, cybersecurity experts have said that the email cache released by WikiLeaks on Friday appears to have been given to the anti-secrecy group by Russian intelligence.” > * [The Washington Post also reported the other day](https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/trump-campaign-guts-gops-anti-russia-stance-on-ukraine/2016/07/18/98adb3b0-4cf3-11e6-a7d8-13d06b37f256_story.html) that the Trump campaign, which generally took no interest in the Republican Party’s official platform, took special care to add language about U.S. policy towards Ukraine – a new position that contradicts GOP foreign-policy orthodoxy – that brings the platform in line with the policies of the Russian government. > * [The New Yorker’s Ryan Lizza, reporting last week from the Republican convention](https://twitter.com/RyanLizza/status/755847169807036416), said he’d spoken to a GOP congressman who believes the “most under-covered story of convention” is Team Trump’s efforts to change the party platform “to be more pro-Putin.” > * Noting Trump’s anti-NATO posture – another break with decades of Republican thought on foreign policy – [The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg, a center-right observer, noted last week](http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/07/clinton-trump-putin-nato/492332/), “Trump is making it clear that, as president, he would allow Russia to advance its hegemonic interests across Europe and the Middle East.” > * TPM’s Josh Marshall [had a lengthy piece over the weekend](http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/trump-putin-yes-it-s-really-a-thing), highlighting Trump’s financial ties to Russia. > * The [Weekly Standard’s Bill Kristol, an anti-Trump Republican, wrote](http://www.weeklystandard.com/putins-party/article/2003473), “If Trump and Manafort don’t act to allay these concerns by releasing their tax returns (or in other ways), wouldn’t it be advisable for a Republican member of Congress to lead an urgent investigation into whether Putin is interfering in the current American election? Trump and Manafort may be Putin’s chumps. Will other Republicans sit by as the whole Republican party becomes Putin’s party?” > * While some have suggested that these questions lend credence to conspiracy theories, [the Washington Post’s Anne Applebaum raised an important point](https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/how-a-trump-presidency-could-destabilize-europe/2016/07/21/9ec38a20-4f75-11e6-a422-83ab49ed5e6a_story.html): ***conspiracy theories tend to focus on allegations of secret misconduct; many of Trump’s ties to Putin are already out in the open***.', '>>{stevebeyten} : So let me get this straight... we are supposed to believe that the guy who was actually on the front lines battling border crime to the point that he had to enter protective custody because of a threat to his life... is biased against Trump because Trump wants to be tough on border crime...? Logic totally checks out. Move along folks.', ">>{nightrhyme} : Yeah. Knowing what I know now I should have done that. But too late now. I can't return it.", '>>{georgiapeanuts} : These questions only come from Clinton trolls. Nobody else I have heard asking questions about such. Another desperate attempt by Clintons to change the subject from the DNC leaks.', ">>{NoBreaksTrumpTrain} : They have a PAC, it's right their on their website. I think that's close enough to show a pretty strong conflict of interest. They are also associated with the National La Raza in their community page. I'm not sure why you are ok with Judges being political. It sounds like a bad idea all around.", '>>{iwinagin} : Why is it "patently stupid"? If they do something illegal they can be arrested and banned from reentry but until that happens their money is as good as anyone else\'s. Not the vacation I\'d normally choose but then again I think Hawaii is overrated so what do I know.', '>>{untitleddocument37} : Of course not. But if your stated reason for being there is to subvert their democracy they have a right to tell you to pound sand.', '>>{nightrhyme} : Sure you are right about that. But it is very suspicious that my device behaves exactly like described in so many forums and videos. - Runs hot and has bad battery life. I already read the article you link to. I must say I have zero trust in apples statement. Me and many 6s owners knows it is a lie.', ">>{cooperred} : > Runs hot and has bad battery life. Sure and I'm not saying you're wrong about that. But that is probably because you had a bad chip and not just because you have a Samsung chip.", ">>{SATexas1} : I'm just shocked that Clinton can drop silliness like this as a talking point and the media picks it up on cue and runs with it. Such nonsense. An election is being rigged", ">>{untitleddocument37} : Because it's subverting their democracy? What if China flew 100K people to Montreal to protest their language laws? Would that be ok?", ">>{iwinagin} : Foreign money being spent at US hotels, restaurants, car rental and airlines? I'm not seeing the downside.", ">>{iwinagin} : That would be wonderful. Annoying but wonderful. Can we make this a thing? Montreal would absolutely adore 100k tourists. Well most would it'd be hell on traffic and such for a week or two and locals would be unable to go out in public because the service industry is swamped. But overall great for the economy.", '>>{goethean} : The New York Times and the Washington Post are Clinton trolls?', ">>{georgiapeanuts} : DNC leaks prove media outlets are puppets for the DNC/Clinton. It is no surprise to me that it is the NYT and WAPO involved in this story. If they were any farther up Clinton's ass they'd be tickling her throat.", ">>{nightrhyme} : Yeah I haven't tested enough Samsung equipped 6s's to be absolutely sure about this. But it seems pretty convincing to me as I have spend entirely too much time reading various sites and forums about this issue. The correlating problems with the Samsung chip seems much too convincing to be just a matter of some bad chips. I take it you have the TSMC ?", '>>{tehcoon89} : I have a great battery life on ios 10.2.1 with samsung chip, cant say the same when I was on 10.3.1.', '>>{nightrhyme} : Ok. Worth a try. So how did You manage to downgrade ?', '>>{miltedmalkball} : Protests are an expression of democracy, not a subversion.', ">>{USModerate} : More and more people are correctly recognizing Trump's racism. Here's another opportunity for the remainder to learn something!", ">>{untitleddocument37} : Except it's not your democracy. When foreigners participate in democracy it's called subversion. Or are you saying the Russians were participating in the American democracy by hacking the DNC?", ">>{untitleddocument37} : I seriously doubt you'd actually enjoy that (unless you're anglophone and even then...). You're not being reasonable nor honest.", '>>{Dirtybrd} : There it is. There it is. The memorized 11 word comment.', '>>{UsernamesAreHard26} : You realize the battery in the 6 is physically larger then the battery in the 6s right? There are plenty of other legitimate reasons you could be experiencing decreased battery life.', ">>{so_so_sherlock} : Won't someone think of the ~~children~~ foreign agitators?!", '>>{tehcoon89} : Well I just checked apple doesnt sign 10.2.1 anymore. You can check on ipsw.me.', '>>{JoshuaZ1} : So, judges can\'t be involved in any organization that has an associated PAC? Seriously? Do you have any experience with the judiciary at all? The existence of a PAC means there\'s a problem? In what universe? > They are also associated with the National La Raza in their community page. Wow, they\'ve got 20 different weblinks of which one is to the NCLR. Is this a discussion about conflicts of interest or is this a game of Six Degrees to Kevin Bacon? Now, do you want to address the substantial, primary issue: Donald Trump never mentioned La Raza. He repeatedly just said that Judge Curiel was "Mexican" despite being born in the US. Now do you want to explain how that isn\'t wildly inappropriate and racist?', ">>{NoBreaksTrumpTrain} : > So, judges can't be involved in any organization that has an associated PAC? Seriously? Do you have any experience with the judiciary at all? The existence of a PAC means there's a problem? In what universe? I think it's a pretty good idea that Judges not be associated with organizations that have political action groups. I have no experience with the judiciary, I'm just offering my perspective as a citizen. I wouldn't want some one who judges me to be active. It's just preventing the appearance of wrong doing. I don't think judges should be associated with the NRA or organizations like that if it makes you feel better.", '>>{goethean} : Oh, I see. So what media sources are more reliable in your opinion? Breitbart? The Daily Caller? The Drudge Report? American Thinker?', ">>{seamonkeydoo2} : I'm pretty sure the remainder isn't really capable of learning anything.", '>>{JoshuaZ1} : > I think it\'s a pretty good idea that Judges not be associated with organizations that have political action groups. I have no experience with the judiciary, I\'m just offering my perspective as a citizen. I wouldn\'t want some one who judges me to be active. It\'s just preventing the appearance of wrong doing. I don\'t think judges should be associated with the NRA or organizations like that if it makes you feel better. Here\'s the problem. Judges are people and they are involved in all sorts of things, whether local community organizations, or local cultural groups, or broader groups. And to say that they can\'t be involved in any organization which has an associated PAC means you are essentially turning them into monks. And we\'re certainly not going to start using radically different and new standards for what judges can and can\'t do to make one candidate happy. And this is all secondary to the primary issue: Donald Trump never mentioned "La Raza" or any variant thereof in his comments. He just repeatedly called Judge Curiel "Mexican"- even if Curiel had a deep association with an overtly, deeply political organization in conflict with Trump (which Judge Curiel does not), it wouldn\'t make Trump\'s comments less racist.', '>>{nightrhyme} : Yeah I read that too. Then I guess I just have the next update will make battery life better.', '>>{kims681} : I have a Samsung chip on my 6s Plus and it lasts way longer than any other phone I ever had', ">>{babbydingo} : He's not a member of the kkk he's just a member of a group of lawyers that exclusively work *for* the kkk", '>>{xHeero} : I think it\'s funny how he keeps asking you this question >He repeatedly just said that Judge Curiel was "Mexican" despite being born in the US. Now do you want to explain how that isn\'t wildly inappropriate and racist? And every time you respond, you dodge it. Kinda like Dodgy Donald.', '>>{JoshuaZ1} : That\'s also not at all accurate. The La Raza Lawyers Association has lawyers working for all sorts of groups and people. And nothing they are doing compares to the KKK. And even if it were the case, it wouldn\'t change the fact that Trump made no comment about La Raza. That just came from his desperate to defend him talking heads. The bottom line is he said "Mexican" repeatedly for a week on end.', ">>{nightrhyme} : Happy for you. The plus versioner seems les affected. My battery percentage counter acts like a rocket launch countdown. Lol it's just crazy.", ">>{WelcomeToBoshwitz} : No not really. In fact, the Supreme Court has held that membership in a lawyers association is not grounds for removal of a judge. If a judge was involved in a bunch of stop Hillary PACs and was judging a claim about super pacs, then maybe he should be removed. If he was judging a case about Hillary's parking tickets, he should not. This judge is not judging anything that has to do with Trump's claims about the border. He's not in any ways tied to Trump University. There is no conflict of interest here. Lol downvoted within 3 seconds of posting this. Okay Trump fans. You're right and SCOTUS is wrong. Your downvotes mean the judge will step down.", '>>{miltedmalkball} : There is a difference between meddling in elections and engaging in public demonstrations regarding issues. The former is a critical and internal part of our system, the latter something much broader that implicates a broader class of stakeholders.', '>>{georgiapeanuts} : Nah, Common Dreams, The Young Turks, Secular Talk, Humanist Report. But nice misdirection trying to label me a Repuke.', ">>{TurboSalsa} : So, still a conspiracy theory at this point. Thanks for the update. It is interesting to see how adamantly the DNC is pushing the Russian hacker narrative after insisting for over a year that Hillary's toilet server was never hacked.", '>>{DebbieHarryPotter} : > foreign agitators *cough*Russia*cough*', '>>{NoBreaksTrumpTrain} : All these flavored and you chose to miss the point.', ">>{xHeero} : No, our point is that Donald could have called the judge out for the reasons you stated. He didn't. He called the guy out for being Mexican. You are doing mental gymnastics to try to explain away Trump's racist statements. That's pretty fucked up man.", ">>{AGreatMan1968} : In the DNC leak it appears that DWS told an MSNBC host that a story needs to stop. That's pretty damning. But that doesn't say anything about the NYT or the Washington Post. MSNBC is a super-liberal network that has had scandals with hosts collaborating too closely with candidates. So unless I missed it, I haven't seen any evidence of the Dems directing these other organizations.", ">>{iwinagin} : I wouldn't enjoy it. But I would appreciate the money. Most people don't really enjoy their job but they do like the money their job brings.", '>>{goethean} : Are more reliable than the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Atlantic, and the New Yorker. So how do you feel about vaccines?', '>>{roodyroody} : They do appear to push a narrative that is pro Clinton. No longer conspiracy to point this out.', ">>{NoBreaksTrumpTrain} : I really don't care to be honest. We know he's not racist, y'all are bouncing around attempting to make him seem like the devil and grasping at straws. This will fall by the wayside just like everything else because it has no honesty and substance to it. Really the only thing you can attack him on is policy, and that seems beyond y'all.", ">>{i_smell_my_poop} : McCarthy would be shocked that it's the Dems continuing his work.", ">>{xHeero} : >I really don't care to be honest. We know he's not racist What makes someone racist? Their views about race deep within their soul? Or their actions? Because his actions are racist. And even if you believe that deep within his soul he is not racist, he still walks, talks, and acts racist. It's sad that you can look at what he said about that judge and not find that racist. In fact, it's more than sad, it's fucked up.", ">>{untitleddocument37} : Anyone who says with a straight face they'd be ok with 100K foreign people coming to their city to protest their government is either an anarchist or a liar.", '>>{jacksonsmashon} : Did trump say anything about that, or just Mexican?', ">>{AGuerrilla} : If they keep this as a talking point, Trump is going to destroy Clinton in the first debate when he brings out Clinton's Saudi Arabia ties with proof rather than speculation.", ">>{untitleddocument37} : If they can't raise enough people domestically than **THAT IS DEMOCRACY**. Importing people who don't have voting rights to then try and influence policy is called subversion.", ">>{untitleddocument37} : You're literally not a stakeholder if you're a foreigner. Canada has its own laws and legal system.", '>>{o2toau} : False, the Washington Post hosted an undisclosed fundraising for the DNC. other media outlets implicated are politico, CBS, CNN, msnbc', '>>{untitleddocument37} : Neither of them have a right to participate in their democratic process.', ">>{miltedmalkball} : Despite Donnie's rhetoric, the impact of US policy doesn't stop at our border. How about a Canadian citizen resident and working in the US. Does that person have no right to express their opinion on the policy issues that impact their everyday life?", ">>{BELIEVE_ME_FOLKS} : First, he was a joke. Then he was a Clinton plant. Then he was literally Hitler. Now he's a Russian plant. The desperation...I literally can't even.", ">>{RIPrince} : He's Mexican though, which is fine. I mean it's great right. He's very proud of his heritage. But I'm building a wall, a wall. It's going to be terrific. And he can't... He can't be unbiased because I'm a complete dipshit. I mean, I'm basically going full on racist here, so how is this judge supposed to be unbiased? It's going to be such a great wall, yuuuuge. Like my hands. -Donald J Trump", '>>{elliotron} : I agree its a bad idea, but the comment "you\'re a liar" isn\'t conducive to dialogue. I would not have made that comment.', '>>{Lixard52} : Well see... the thing is... your friend Donald Trump didn\'t say any of that. He said that it was impossible for the judge to be impartial because he was "Mexican." He didn\'t say anything about the judge\'s beliefs or his political leanings. He said that he was Mexican and must be proud of being Mexican, and therefore could not be an impartial jurist due to his race.', ">>{untitleddocument37} : Because you can't refute an argument with unreasonableness. The reality is 99% of people wouldn't be ok with a mass influx of foreigners protesting their government. So if it's not ok for 100K chinese why is it ok for 6 Canadians? Reality is it's none of your god damn business.", ">>{stevebeyten} : Let's dispel with the notion that these people don't know what they are doing. They know EXACTLY what they are doing.", ">>{untitleddocument37} : You can quit your job and move north. You're not a citizen, you're a guest.", '>>{miltedmalkball} : Lol. Free speech is still a thing compadre.', ">>{elliotron} : > So if it's not ok for 100K chinese why is it ok for 6 Canadians? Thank you for putting those two numbers in context.", ">>{untitleddocument37} : You're welcome. The point is it's not ok for either group.", ">>{Babushka5} : There's no way this was said by him. He's never said something so eloquent", ">>{Beitje} : The things La Raza does compare DIRECTLY to the KKK. It's the Mexican KKK.", ">>{JoshuaZ1} : No. This is simply ignorant.There are multiple organizations called La Raza. Most of the time people are talking about the [NCLR](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Council_of_La_Raza) which is a political group advocating specific political goals. They aren't in favor of racial purity, or lynching anyone, or anything remotely like that. You can criticize their politics, but that's different. Moreover, it isn't even a Mexican organization, so that's also wrong. It is a broad, Hispanic organization in the US.", '>>{youareaspastic} : If I keep saying bullshit some of it might be true!', ">>{horace999} : I think you'll find that most (if not all) people disagree with at least some decisions the SCOTUS has reached. The fact that they decided something does not mean that Americans have to stop talking about the issue. The people are still the ultimate authority in this country.", ">>{horace999} : Unless he's just extremely lucky, every time we second-guess him and think we know what he should do strategically, he turns out to be right. I don't pretend to know what he should be doing, but I wonder if he said what he said so that we would be talking about it. People always remember facts they discover on their own better than facts that they are simply told. We got interested because of Trump's comments, but now we're digging into things and know all about the judges affiliations. Effective? The other thing to consider is that Trump doesn't need to get 100% of the vote. He may be targeting his tactics to gain favor with someone who thinks differently than you do.", ">>{garbagetimes} : > Unless he's just extremely lucky, every time we second-guess him and think we know what he should do strategically, he turns out to be right No, his supporters turn out to be, again, liars. Lying about the lawyers association, lying about scholarships, lying about everything. Because you can't handle the fact that your God king is a God damn moron and a bigot and you can't defend him with the truth.", ">>{horace999} : I was commenting from a strategic point of view. Is Trump making the best strategic decisions, or do his supporters know better? In the contest of Trump vs Clinton, I don't think it's going to come down to who is the most honest during the campaign. Calling each other liars is just going to be background noise to voters.", '>>{untitleddocument37} : You only have "free speech" once you\'re in the country and technically as a visitor you can be removed for a lot of reasons that wouldn\'t apply to a resident or citizen.', ">>{miltedmalkball} : The hypo we're discussing is one of a non-citizen resident in the US. Your anti-constitution authoritarianism is showing.", '>>{DuckManian} : my intelligent friend what makes you think lefties understand strategy. they only know how to sucker punch people/ attack them in groups when not screaming sexist, racist, homophone, islamophobe etc.', ">>{untitleddocument37} : The story is about Canadians visiting the US for the purposes of joining a demonstration. It's not ok for 1 person to do it for the same reason it's not for 100,000 people to do it.", '>>{DuckManian} : dear liberal this is going to anger you but the judge is an anchor baby he was born in the usa to illegals.', ">>{miltedmalkball} : Neat attempt at pivoting. It's just fine for folks to be heard. Our Constitution expressly contemplates it.", '>>{untitleddocument37} : Except no it doesn\'t. First off, the rights in the constitution apply to people already in the borders. The border agents can refuse people for any reason that doesn\'t violate treaties. You don\'t have a treaty right to participate in protests in America (from Canada). It\'s not "pivoting" it\'s the fucking point.', ">>{saladbar} : The remainder don't need to learn it. They get it just fine, but happen to like him for it. This is nothing more than a dog whistle to his fans that he is indeed just like them.", '>>{horace999} : You missed a word, but according to the Declaration of Independence, ultimate authority lies with the people, and any attempt to declare otherwise is simply ignoring reality. If the court makes enough decisions that go against the will of the people, they will be seen as illegitimate and replaced.', ">>{miltedmalkball} : No need to be so triggered. You posited that only voters have the right to protest and only voters have a stake in US policy. I asked about non-citizen residents, with respect to whom you blathered some falsehoods and then pivoted. You apparently think imposing loyalty tests on tourism is okay and that's your prerogative, but it's an undemocratic viewpoint and I'll call it such.", ">>{untitleddocument37} : Um the entire thread is about **WHAT HAPPENS TO CANADIANS TRYING TO ATTEND PROTESTS?** ... if anything you pivoted to American Residents. Who have a right to participate in demonstrations because they're afforded 1st amendment rights. The article is about **entering** the country.", '>>{untitleddocument37} : Except that they were born in the country... Visitors to the country are different. If you want to participate in American democracy then put your life on the line and immigrate there.', '>>{miltedmalkball} : Wow you can pivot in all caps too. Who would have thought.', '>>{miltedmalkball} : I love that people run away instead of owning up to being wrong.', ">>{untitleddocument37} : They told the CBP officer they were there to protest. Had they kept their mouth shut and then attended the protest (provided they didn't then break any laws) they would have been fine. But people live in a fantasy land. You can be denied visitor status (entry) for intending to participate in something that is potentially unlawful or contributing to unrest/etc. You can be denied residency/citizenship for the same. It's no different in Canada. We turn away people with DUIs (even though it's not criminal in the USA), we turn away religious protesters, we turn away parolees, etc.", '>>{Im_100percent_human} : A good friend of mine is a foreign citizen with a US green card (permanent resident). Is she allowed to march, given that she is not allowed to participate in our democracy.', ">>{untitleddocument37} : She's already in the country and afforded 1st amendment rights. But if she applied for a perm status under the premise of attending protests she could have easily been denied. What's immoral is people who really don't have a stake in the fight (they don't live there) protesting the government that doesn't answer to them. I'd no more want foreigners coming here to protest my government than tolerate Canadians going elsewhere to protest foreign governments.", '>>{Im_100percent_human} : You may not like visitors coming here and expressing their opinion, but that is NOT the law. We have explicit requirements for entrance, and expressing disapproval or practicing free speech is not forbidden and NOT grounds for denial.', '>>{untitleddocument37} : It really depends on what treaties say. You can be denied entry for things that are legal for residents/citizens but not for visitors. For instance, bringing a firearm into Canada without a license can result in you being turned away even though residents can have firearms...', '>>{Im_100percent_human} : You have to abide by the laws of the country you are coming into. That is a given. Also, I know Canada is very strict about turning away people with criminal records.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{nightrhyme} : Iphone 6s battery life. Wow. The tests weren't lying", ">>{nightrhyme} : That is what I keep reading. But what I'm telling you is that the difference is really noticeable when you come from a 6 to a 6s. Which it shouldn't be", ">>{DatDeLorean} : Contrary to what some have claimed, battery life on a 6S can be worse than a 6. It has a smaller battery capacity and whilst it's more energy efficient that's more relevant for standby than active states. I doubt it's because the CPU is manufactured by company A instead of company B.", '>>{Pippkorn} : Yeah the battery really is something else. In a negative way.', '>>{nightrhyme} : As shown in this video the 6 has a better battery life than the 6s(samsung) but worse than the 6s(TSMC) so the 6s actually has the potential to be more energy efficient than the 6 even with a smaller battery. And this under heavy load. Mine also runs very hot as noticed in this video. https://youtu.be/TbBCjcco67I?t=2m12s', '>>{nightrhyme} : Yes. I wish I had taken the reports seriously.', ">>{nightrhyme} : So to anyone considering upgrading from 6 to 6s and trying to make an informed decision about this chipgate thing and being told that it's a non issue in real world usage. Don't believe it. It is much more noticeable than apple wants you to know", '>>{cooperred} : Odds are, you just have a bad chip. You can\'t make the generalization that "all Samsung chips are bad." If you build PCs of any kind, you\'ve heard about the silicon lottery. That\'s just as much of a thing in phone chips as well. https://www.wired.com/2015/10/iphone-6s-a9-battery-life/', ">>{nightrhyme} : Yeah. Knowing what I know now I should have done that. But too late now. I can't return it.", '>>{nightrhyme} : Sure you are right about that. But it is very suspicious that my device behaves exactly like described in so many forums and videos. - Runs hot and has bad battery life. I already read the article you link to. I must say I have zero trust in apples statement. Me and many 6s owners knows it is a lie.', ">>{cooperred} : > Runs hot and has bad battery life. Sure and I'm not saying you're wrong about that. But that is probably because you had a bad chip and not just because you have a Samsung chip.", ">>{nightrhyme} : Yeah I haven't tested enough Samsung equipped 6s's to be absolutely sure about this. But it seems pretty convincing to me as I have spend entirely too much time reading various sites and forums about this issue. The correlating problems with the Samsung chip seems much too convincing to be just a matter of some bad chips. I take it you have the TSMC ?", '>>{tehcoon89} : I have a great battery life on ios 10.2.1 with samsung chip, cant say the same when I was on 10.3.1.', '>>{nightrhyme} : Ok. Worth a try. So how did You manage to downgrade ?', '>>{UsernamesAreHard26} : You realize the battery in the 6 is physically larger then the battery in the 6s right? There are plenty of other legitimate reasons you could be experiencing decreased battery life.', '>>{tehcoon89} : Well I just checked apple doesnt sign 10.2.1 anymore. You can check on ipsw.me.', '>>{nightrhyme} : Yeah I read that too. Then I guess I just have the next update will make battery life better.', '>>{kims681} : I have a Samsung chip on my 6s Plus and it lasts way longer than any other phone I ever had', ">>{nightrhyme} : Happy for you. The plus versioner seems les affected. My battery percentage counter acts like a rocket launch countdown. Lol it's just crazy."], [">>{Im_100percent_human} : Women's March On Washington 2017: What Happened To Canadians Trying To Attend Protest?", '>>{Im_100percent_human} : Are we going to restrict tourism only to those that are pro-Trump? What are the implications of turning away those that simply disagree with the US President?', ">>{Bush--did911} : You don't know what being a fascist is all about", '>>{squaqua} : This has been posted before. Letting people into the country who are admittedly entering for the sole purpose of protesting our government is patently stupid.', '>>{anonuisance} : What are the implications of inviting every foreigner to come protest our government?', '>>{iwinagin} : Why is it "patently stupid"? If they do something illegal they can be arrested and banned from reentry but until that happens their money is as good as anyone else\'s. Not the vacation I\'d normally choose but then again I think Hawaii is overrated so what do I know.', '>>{untitleddocument37} : Of course not. But if your stated reason for being there is to subvert their democracy they have a right to tell you to pound sand.', ">>{untitleddocument37} : Because it's subverting their democracy? What if China flew 100K people to Montreal to protest their language laws? Would that be ok?", ">>{iwinagin} : Foreign money being spent at US hotels, restaurants, car rental and airlines? I'm not seeing the downside.", ">>{iwinagin} : That would be wonderful. Annoying but wonderful. Can we make this a thing? Montreal would absolutely adore 100k tourists. Well most would it'd be hell on traffic and such for a week or two and locals would be unable to go out in public because the service industry is swamped. But overall great for the economy.", '>>{miltedmalkball} : Protests are an expression of democracy, not a subversion.', ">>{untitleddocument37} : Except it's not your democracy. When foreigners participate in democracy it's called subversion. Or are you saying the Russians were participating in the American democracy by hacking the DNC?", ">>{untitleddocument37} : I seriously doubt you'd actually enjoy that (unless you're anglophone and even then...). You're not being reasonable nor honest.", ">>{so_so_sherlock} : Won't someone think of the ~~children~~ foreign agitators?!", '>>{miltedmalkball} : There is a difference between meddling in elections and engaging in public demonstrations regarding issues. The former is a critical and internal part of our system, the latter something much broader that implicates a broader class of stakeholders.', '>>{DebbieHarryPotter} : > foreign agitators *cough*Russia*cough*', ">>{iwinagin} : I wouldn't enjoy it. But I would appreciate the money. Most people don't really enjoy their job but they do like the money their job brings.", ">>{untitleddocument37} : Anyone who says with a straight face they'd be ok with 100K foreign people coming to their city to protest their government is either an anarchist or a liar.", ">>{untitleddocument37} : If they can't raise enough people domestically than **THAT IS DEMOCRACY**. Importing people who don't have voting rights to then try and influence policy is called subversion.", ">>{untitleddocument37} : You're literally not a stakeholder if you're a foreigner. Canada has its own laws and legal system.", '>>{untitleddocument37} : Neither of them have a right to participate in their democratic process.', ">>{miltedmalkball} : Despite Donnie's rhetoric, the impact of US policy doesn't stop at our border. How about a Canadian citizen resident and working in the US. Does that person have no right to express their opinion on the policy issues that impact their everyday life?", '>>{elliotron} : I agree its a bad idea, but the comment "you\'re a liar" isn\'t conducive to dialogue. I would not have made that comment.', ">>{untitleddocument37} : Because you can't refute an argument with unreasonableness. The reality is 99% of people wouldn't be ok with a mass influx of foreigners protesting their government. So if it's not ok for 100K chinese why is it ok for 6 Canadians? Reality is it's none of your god damn business.", ">>{untitleddocument37} : You can quit your job and move north. You're not a citizen, you're a guest.", '>>{miltedmalkball} : Lol. Free speech is still a thing compadre.', ">>{elliotron} : > So if it's not ok for 100K chinese why is it ok for 6 Canadians? Thank you for putting those two numbers in context.", ">>{untitleddocument37} : You're welcome. The point is it's not ok for either group.", '>>{untitleddocument37} : You only have "free speech" once you\'re in the country and technically as a visitor you can be removed for a lot of reasons that wouldn\'t apply to a resident or citizen.', ">>{miltedmalkball} : The hypo we're discussing is one of a non-citizen resident in the US. Your anti-constitution authoritarianism is showing.", ">>{untitleddocument37} : The story is about Canadians visiting the US for the purposes of joining a demonstration. It's not ok for 1 person to do it for the same reason it's not for 100,000 people to do it.", ">>{miltedmalkball} : Neat attempt at pivoting. It's just fine for folks to be heard. Our Constitution expressly contemplates it.", '>>{untitleddocument37} : Except no it doesn\'t. First off, the rights in the constitution apply to people already in the borders. The border agents can refuse people for any reason that doesn\'t violate treaties. You don\'t have a treaty right to participate in protests in America (from Canada). It\'s not "pivoting" it\'s the fucking point.', ">>{miltedmalkball} : No need to be so triggered. You posited that only voters have the right to protest and only voters have a stake in US policy. I asked about non-citizen residents, with respect to whom you blathered some falsehoods and then pivoted. You apparently think imposing loyalty tests on tourism is okay and that's your prerogative, but it's an undemocratic viewpoint and I'll call it such.", ">>{untitleddocument37} : Um the entire thread is about **WHAT HAPPENS TO CANADIANS TRYING TO ATTEND PROTESTS?** ... if anything you pivoted to American Residents. Who have a right to participate in demonstrations because they're afforded 1st amendment rights. The article is about **entering** the country.", '>>{untitleddocument37} : Except that they were born in the country... Visitors to the country are different. If you want to participate in American democracy then put your life on the line and immigrate there.', '>>{miltedmalkball} : Wow you can pivot in all caps too. Who would have thought.', '>>{miltedmalkball} : I love that people run away instead of owning up to being wrong.', ">>{untitleddocument37} : They told the CBP officer they were there to protest. Had they kept their mouth shut and then attended the protest (provided they didn't then break any laws) they would have been fine. But people live in a fantasy land. You can be denied visitor status (entry) for intending to participate in something that is potentially unlawful or contributing to unrest/etc. You can be denied residency/citizenship for the same. It's no different in Canada. We turn away people with DUIs (even though it's not criminal in the USA), we turn away religious protesters, we turn away parolees, etc.", '>>{Im_100percent_human} : A good friend of mine is a foreign citizen with a US green card (permanent resident). Is she allowed to march, given that she is not allowed to participate in our democracy.', ">>{untitleddocument37} : She's already in the country and afforded 1st amendment rights. But if she applied for a perm status under the premise of attending protests she could have easily been denied. What's immoral is people who really don't have a stake in the fight (they don't live there) protesting the government that doesn't answer to them. I'd no more want foreigners coming here to protest my government than tolerate Canadians going elsewhere to protest foreign governments.", '>>{Im_100percent_human} : You may not like visitors coming here and expressing their opinion, but that is NOT the law. We have explicit requirements for entrance, and expressing disapproval or practicing free speech is not forbidden and NOT grounds for denial.', '>>{untitleddocument37} : It really depends on what treaties say. You can be denied entry for things that are legal for residents/citizens but not for visitors. For instance, bringing a firearm into Canada without a license can result in you being turned away even though residents can have firearms...', '>>{Im_100percent_human} : You have to abide by the laws of the country you are coming into. That is a given. Also, I know Canada is very strict about turning away people with criminal records.'], ['>>{roodyroody} : Yes of course the Russians rigged the election for Hillary. Ohh wait no I guess this is media damage control in effect.', ">>{EoinODuffy_} : It's like 1955 again and there is red scare propaganda.", '>>{Richafod} : So many more questions surround the content on the email than do where the hacks came from.', '>>{xahnel} : New answers point to that time Russians bought Hillary to get uranium. KGB SOP: once you bribe someone, you own them. Why would Russia sabotage a chance to put someone they own in the White House?', '>>{goethean} : > * [The New York Times reports today](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/25/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-emails.html?_r=0), “[R]esearchers have concluded that the national committee was breached by two Russian intelligence agencies, which were the same attackers behind previous Russian cyberoperations at the White House, the State Department and the Joint Chiefs of Staff last year. And metadata from the released emails suggests that the documents passed through Russian computers….. Whether the thefts were ordered by Mr. Putin, or just carried out by apparatchiks who thought they might please him, is anyone’s guess.” > * [The Washington Post reported overnight](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clinton-campaign--and-some-cyber-experts--say-russia-is-behind-email-release/2016/07/24/5b5428e6-51a8-11e6-bbf5-957ad17b4385_story.html), “In the past 24 hours, cybersecurity experts have said that the email cache released by WikiLeaks on Friday appears to have been given to the anti-secrecy group by Russian intelligence.” > * [The Washington Post also reported the other day](https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/trump-campaign-guts-gops-anti-russia-stance-on-ukraine/2016/07/18/98adb3b0-4cf3-11e6-a7d8-13d06b37f256_story.html) that the Trump campaign, which generally took no interest in the Republican Party’s official platform, took special care to add language about U.S. policy towards Ukraine – a new position that contradicts GOP foreign-policy orthodoxy – that brings the platform in line with the policies of the Russian government. > * [The New Yorker’s Ryan Lizza, reporting last week from the Republican convention](https://twitter.com/RyanLizza/status/755847169807036416), said he’d spoken to a GOP congressman who believes the “most under-covered story of convention” is Team Trump’s efforts to change the party platform “to be more pro-Putin.” > * Noting Trump’s anti-NATO posture – another break with decades of Republican thought on foreign policy – [The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg, a center-right observer, noted last week](http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/07/clinton-trump-putin-nato/492332/), “Trump is making it clear that, as president, he would allow Russia to advance its hegemonic interests across Europe and the Middle East.” > * TPM’s Josh Marshall [had a lengthy piece over the weekend](http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/trump-putin-yes-it-s-really-a-thing), highlighting Trump’s financial ties to Russia. > * The [Weekly Standard’s Bill Kristol, an anti-Trump Republican, wrote](http://www.weeklystandard.com/putins-party/article/2003473), “If Trump and Manafort don’t act to allay these concerns by releasing their tax returns (or in other ways), wouldn’t it be advisable for a Republican member of Congress to lead an urgent investigation into whether Putin is interfering in the current American election? Trump and Manafort may be Putin’s chumps. Will other Republicans sit by as the whole Republican party becomes Putin’s party?” > * While some have suggested that these questions lend credence to conspiracy theories, [the Washington Post’s Anne Applebaum raised an important point](https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/how-a-trump-presidency-could-destabilize-europe/2016/07/21/9ec38a20-4f75-11e6-a422-83ab49ed5e6a_story.html): ***conspiracy theories tend to focus on allegations of secret misconduct; many of Trump’s ties to Putin are already out in the open***.', '>>{georgiapeanuts} : These questions only come from Clinton trolls. Nobody else I have heard asking questions about such. Another desperate attempt by Clintons to change the subject from the DNC leaks.', ">>{SATexas1} : I'm just shocked that Clinton can drop silliness like this as a talking point and the media picks it up on cue and runs with it. Such nonsense. An election is being rigged", '>>{goethean} : The New York Times and the Washington Post are Clinton trolls?', ">>{georgiapeanuts} : DNC leaks prove media outlets are puppets for the DNC/Clinton. It is no surprise to me that it is the NYT and WAPO involved in this story. If they were any farther up Clinton's ass they'd be tickling her throat.", '>>{goethean} : Oh, I see. So what media sources are more reliable in your opinion? Breitbart? The Daily Caller? The Drudge Report? American Thinker?', '>>{georgiapeanuts} : Nah, Common Dreams, The Young Turks, Secular Talk, Humanist Report. But nice misdirection trying to label me a Repuke.', ">>{TurboSalsa} : So, still a conspiracy theory at this point. Thanks for the update. It is interesting to see how adamantly the DNC is pushing the Russian hacker narrative after insisting for over a year that Hillary's toilet server was never hacked.", ">>{AGreatMan1968} : In the DNC leak it appears that DWS told an MSNBC host that a story needs to stop. That's pretty damning. But that doesn't say anything about the NYT or the Washington Post. MSNBC is a super-liberal network that has had scandals with hosts collaborating too closely with candidates. So unless I missed it, I haven't seen any evidence of the Dems directing these other organizations.", '>>{goethean} : Are more reliable than the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Atlantic, and the New Yorker. So how do you feel about vaccines?', '>>{roodyroody} : They do appear to push a narrative that is pro Clinton. No longer conspiracy to point this out.', ">>{i_smell_my_poop} : McCarthy would be shocked that it's the Dems continuing his work.", ">>{AGuerrilla} : If they keep this as a talking point, Trump is going to destroy Clinton in the first debate when he brings out Clinton's Saudi Arabia ties with proof rather than speculation.", '>>{o2toau} : False, the Washington Post hosted an undisclosed fundraising for the DNC. other media outlets implicated are politico, CBS, CNN, msnbc', ">>{BELIEVE_ME_FOLKS} : First, he was a joke. Then he was a Clinton plant. Then he was literally Hitler. Now he's a Russian plant. The desperation...I literally can't even."], ['>>{Lixard52} : The Judge Trump Keeps Insulting Once Had A Cartel Boss Put A Hit On Him', ">>{BebopRocksteady82} : He's in La Raza, I think Trump has a point here", '>>{JoshuaZ1} : He\'s associated with the La Raza Lawyers Association. They aren\'t the same as the National Council of La Raza. And Trump never brought any claim about La Raza, rather Trump just kept repeating that Judge Curiel was "Mexican" despite being born in the US. This is bigotry on Trump\'s part, pure and simple.', '>>{FookYu315} : And what excuse do you have cooked up for his comments regarding a Muslim judge?', '>>{stevebeyten} : So let me get this straight... we are supposed to believe that the guy who was actually on the front lines battling border crime to the point that he had to enter protective custody because of a threat to his life... is biased against Trump because Trump wants to be tough on border crime...? Logic totally checks out. Move along folks.', ">>{NoBreaksTrumpTrain} : They have a PAC, it's right their on their website. I think that's close enough to show a pretty strong conflict of interest. They are also associated with the National La Raza in their community page. I'm not sure why you are ok with Judges being political. It sounds like a bad idea all around.", ">>{USModerate} : More and more people are correctly recognizing Trump's racism. Here's another opportunity for the remainder to learn something!", '>>{Dirtybrd} : There it is. There it is. The memorized 11 word comment.', '>>{JoshuaZ1} : So, judges can\'t be involved in any organization that has an associated PAC? Seriously? Do you have any experience with the judiciary at all? The existence of a PAC means there\'s a problem? In what universe? > They are also associated with the National La Raza in their community page. Wow, they\'ve got 20 different weblinks of which one is to the NCLR. Is this a discussion about conflicts of interest or is this a game of Six Degrees to Kevin Bacon? Now, do you want to address the substantial, primary issue: Donald Trump never mentioned La Raza. He repeatedly just said that Judge Curiel was "Mexican" despite being born in the US. Now do you want to explain how that isn\'t wildly inappropriate and racist?', ">>{NoBreaksTrumpTrain} : > So, judges can't be involved in any organization that has an associated PAC? Seriously? Do you have any experience with the judiciary at all? The existence of a PAC means there's a problem? In what universe? I think it's a pretty good idea that Judges not be associated with organizations that have political action groups. I have no experience with the judiciary, I'm just offering my perspective as a citizen. I wouldn't want some one who judges me to be active. It's just preventing the appearance of wrong doing. I don't think judges should be associated with the NRA or organizations like that if it makes you feel better.", ">>{seamonkeydoo2} : I'm pretty sure the remainder isn't really capable of learning anything.", '>>{JoshuaZ1} : > I think it\'s a pretty good idea that Judges not be associated with organizations that have political action groups. I have no experience with the judiciary, I\'m just offering my perspective as a citizen. I wouldn\'t want some one who judges me to be active. It\'s just preventing the appearance of wrong doing. I don\'t think judges should be associated with the NRA or organizations like that if it makes you feel better. Here\'s the problem. Judges are people and they are involved in all sorts of things, whether local community organizations, or local cultural groups, or broader groups. And to say that they can\'t be involved in any organization which has an associated PAC means you are essentially turning them into monks. And we\'re certainly not going to start using radically different and new standards for what judges can and can\'t do to make one candidate happy. And this is all secondary to the primary issue: Donald Trump never mentioned "La Raza" or any variant thereof in his comments. He just repeatedly called Judge Curiel "Mexican"- even if Curiel had a deep association with an overtly, deeply political organization in conflict with Trump (which Judge Curiel does not), it wouldn\'t make Trump\'s comments less racist.', ">>{babbydingo} : He's not a member of the kkk he's just a member of a group of lawyers that exclusively work *for* the kkk", '>>{xHeero} : I think it\'s funny how he keeps asking you this question >He repeatedly just said that Judge Curiel was "Mexican" despite being born in the US. Now do you want to explain how that isn\'t wildly inappropriate and racist? And every time you respond, you dodge it. Kinda like Dodgy Donald.', '>>{JoshuaZ1} : That\'s also not at all accurate. The La Raza Lawyers Association has lawyers working for all sorts of groups and people. And nothing they are doing compares to the KKK. And even if it were the case, it wouldn\'t change the fact that Trump made no comment about La Raza. That just came from his desperate to defend him talking heads. The bottom line is he said "Mexican" repeatedly for a week on end.', ">>{WelcomeToBoshwitz} : No not really. In fact, the Supreme Court has held that membership in a lawyers association is not grounds for removal of a judge. If a judge was involved in a bunch of stop Hillary PACs and was judging a claim about super pacs, then maybe he should be removed. If he was judging a case about Hillary's parking tickets, he should not. This judge is not judging anything that has to do with Trump's claims about the border. He's not in any ways tied to Trump University. There is no conflict of interest here. Lol downvoted within 3 seconds of posting this. Okay Trump fans. You're right and SCOTUS is wrong. Your downvotes mean the judge will step down.", '>>{NoBreaksTrumpTrain} : All these flavored and you chose to miss the point.', ">>{xHeero} : No, our point is that Donald could have called the judge out for the reasons you stated. He didn't. He called the guy out for being Mexican. You are doing mental gymnastics to try to explain away Trump's racist statements. That's pretty fucked up man.", ">>{NoBreaksTrumpTrain} : I really don't care to be honest. We know he's not racist, y'all are bouncing around attempting to make him seem like the devil and grasping at straws. This will fall by the wayside just like everything else because it has no honesty and substance to it. Really the only thing you can attack him on is policy, and that seems beyond y'all.", ">>{xHeero} : >I really don't care to be honest. We know he's not racist What makes someone racist? Their views about race deep within their soul? Or their actions? Because his actions are racist. And even if you believe that deep within his soul he is not racist, he still walks, talks, and acts racist. It's sad that you can look at what he said about that judge and not find that racist. In fact, it's more than sad, it's fucked up.", '>>{jacksonsmashon} : Did trump say anything about that, or just Mexican?', ">>{RIPrince} : He's Mexican though, which is fine. I mean it's great right. He's very proud of his heritage. But I'm building a wall, a wall. It's going to be terrific. And he can't... He can't be unbiased because I'm a complete dipshit. I mean, I'm basically going full on racist here, so how is this judge supposed to be unbiased? It's going to be such a great wall, yuuuuge. Like my hands. -Donald J Trump", '>>{Lixard52} : Well see... the thing is... your friend Donald Trump didn\'t say any of that. He said that it was impossible for the judge to be impartial because he was "Mexican." He didn\'t say anything about the judge\'s beliefs or his political leanings. He said that he was Mexican and must be proud of being Mexican, and therefore could not be an impartial jurist due to his race.', ">>{stevebeyten} : Let's dispel with the notion that these people don't know what they are doing. They know EXACTLY what they are doing.", ">>{Babushka5} : There's no way this was said by him. He's never said something so eloquent", ">>{Beitje} : The things La Raza does compare DIRECTLY to the KKK. It's the Mexican KKK.", ">>{JoshuaZ1} : No. This is simply ignorant.There are multiple organizations called La Raza. Most of the time people are talking about the [NCLR](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Council_of_La_Raza) which is a political group advocating specific political goals. They aren't in favor of racial purity, or lynching anyone, or anything remotely like that. You can criticize their politics, but that's different. Moreover, it isn't even a Mexican organization, so that's also wrong. It is a broad, Hispanic organization in the US.", '>>{youareaspastic} : If I keep saying bullshit some of it might be true!', ">>{horace999} : I think you'll find that most (if not all) people disagree with at least some decisions the SCOTUS has reached. The fact that they decided something does not mean that Americans have to stop talking about the issue. The people are still the ultimate authority in this country.", ">>{horace999} : Unless he's just extremely lucky, every time we second-guess him and think we know what he should do strategically, he turns out to be right. I don't pretend to know what he should be doing, but I wonder if he said what he said so that we would be talking about it. People always remember facts they discover on their own better than facts that they are simply told. We got interested because of Trump's comments, but now we're digging into things and know all about the judges affiliations. Effective? The other thing to consider is that Trump doesn't need to get 100% of the vote. He may be targeting his tactics to gain favor with someone who thinks differently than you do.", ">>{garbagetimes} : > Unless he's just extremely lucky, every time we second-guess him and think we know what he should do strategically, he turns out to be right No, his supporters turn out to be, again, liars. Lying about the lawyers association, lying about scholarships, lying about everything. Because you can't handle the fact that your God king is a God damn moron and a bigot and you can't defend him with the truth.", ">>{horace999} : I was commenting from a strategic point of view. Is Trump making the best strategic decisions, or do his supporters know better? In the contest of Trump vs Clinton, I don't think it's going to come down to who is the most honest during the campaign. Calling each other liars is just going to be background noise to voters.", '>>{DuckManian} : my intelligent friend what makes you think lefties understand strategy. they only know how to sucker punch people/ attack them in groups when not screaming sexist, racist, homophone, islamophobe etc.', '>>{DuckManian} : dear liberal this is going to anger you but the judge is an anchor baby he was born in the usa to illegals.', ">>{saladbar} : The remainder don't need to learn it. They get it just fine, but happen to like him for it. This is nothing more than a dog whistle to his fans that he is indeed just like them.", '>>{horace999} : You missed a word, but according to the Declaration of Independence, ultimate authority lies with the people, and any attempt to declare otherwise is simply ignoring reality. If the court makes enough decisions that go against the will of the people, they will be seen as illegitimate and replaced.']]

classify and reply

['>>{Jimstein} : Around 5.5gb of "Used" memory on my 16GB iPhone 5s is unaccounted for', '>>{Positive_pressure} : Privilege: Many Jill Stein Voters Have It, and Many Hillary Clinton Voters Do, Too', ">>{TheOrangeGroper} : On Nov. 9, Let's Forget Donald Trump Happened", ">>{BankNasty} : I had the same problem. For me, the photos app wasn't actually deleting photos, yet wasn't displaying them. Check the size of your photos app and make sure it's aligned with how many photos you have.", ">>{Jimstein} : I wish that was it. I have emptied my photos many times over the last few months, even downloaded some apps to try and force clear caches or photo caches. Right now I have about 100 photos and some videos, it's definitely not anywhere close to 5 gigs of content.", '>>{Deadeyebyby} : Why the need to post this two weeks after it being written?', ">>{GAforTrump} : Don't Panic, Folks! The Establishment Is Supposed to Be Against Trump", ">>{icnoevil} : DEMOCRATS: Trump's Russia controversy is 'already bigger than Watergate'", '>>{lshaw52} : Try going into iTunes and renting a movie that is huge in space. Try Lord of the Rings:Two Towers. It will tell you that your phone doesnt have enough space to rent. Let that run for a minute and your storage will increase. I will do it right now, and post screenshots of the results. Here you are https://imgur.com/a/RvfD0', ">>{Firetrucker} : TL;DR: Repblicans aren't supposed to like Trump, no one is and that's how he's going to win! No, I'm not back on the pills... what?", ">>{iakt} : http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/how-to-factory-reset-an-iphone/3/ This. Otherwise things will just stay cached no matter how many movies you'll download.", '>>{icnoevil} : Democrats have just been handed a pot of gold, but they probably will screw it up.', '>>{miltedmalkball} : As Aaron Sorkin put it >If liberals are so fucking smart, how come they lose so god damn always?', ">>{Positive_pressure} : I just found out about it today on The Jimmy Dore Show: [Shocker: Who's Voting For Jill Stein? Not Who You Think!](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hn5-xXeC95U)", '>>{0ne_Word} : Without a doubt this is bigger. This is Russian intrusion of the Office of the President of the United States. On top of that the POTUS himself may be compromised by Russian intel services. Who knew what and when did they know it? This has to be answered, quickly and fully.', '>>{Majnum} : Please NOT! If we forget It would happens again!', ">>{gonzone} : Rush needs to go back to the Dominican Republic and take more Viagra there. I hereby promise, from this day forward, to solemnly downvote every link to Rush. It's the only right thing to do.", ">>{progresstogether} : Clinton voters by and large have EARNED the privllege that we have. Unlike Trumpkins, we worked hard and went to college and got degrees. We contribute to the knowledge economy and the creative economy. Yeah, some of us pro-Clinton people were born with privilege, but those people acknowledge it UNLIKE the Trumpkins, who think that the way they were born makes them entitled to find a job and make a living. What a joke this article is. The mods aren't doing there job. I think I'll have to write them an email so they can wake up.", '>>{Loxodontist} : Agreed. He needs to fade away from the body politic. In a perfect world, the only thing we hear about Trump after the election is his death.', '>>{not__banksy} : I see people are here to Correct the Record.', ">>{aKindWordandaGun} : I'm sure the 85-87% of black voters supporting Clinton to Trump's 1-2% and 70% to 19% of Latino voters will find those claims very interesting.", ">>{Jimstein} : Unfortunately I could not get this to work :/ I'm sure it works in some cases but after trying various attempts with this kind of tactic, I could not see any reduction.", ">>{danelectro15} : Yup if anyone disagrees with you it's a conspiracy!", ">>{Atomix117} : I don't really think it is yet. I think it has the potential to be bigger but it isn't yet.", '>>{Firetrucker} : What is being corrected? Rusty is wrong? The GOP loves Trump?', '>>{11110000q} : i.e the Wall Street banker press wishes to propagate a reality of it is all done and over', ">>{not__banksy} : Over 90% of all articles in r/politics with more than 10 points are anti-Trump. Find three pro-Trump articles here in the last week that is anything positive for Trump. I never claimed a conspiracy, it's well-known CTR has soent over $6million so far for social media propaganda.", '>>{rdevaughn} : If Aaron Sorkin is so fucking smart, how come Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and the fact that Democrats have [controlled the House and the Senate more times than Republicans, 57-35 and 50-42 respectively](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_divisions_of_United_States_Congresses)?', '>>{Positive_pressure} : Voting for status quo candidate is the most privileged thing you can do.', ">>{danelectro15} : Maybe it's because Trump has been saying the most insane things we've ever heard in a presidential election and the public is reacting accordingly? That is a much simpler explanation.", ">>{Firetrucker} : Um. Find a positive Trump story? He's kinda fucking everything up is the problem, so much so Limbaugh has to pretend it's all part of the plan.", '>>{mattreyu} : > Clinton voters by and large have EARNED the privllege that we have. > Yeah, some of us pro-Clinton people were born with privilege, but those people acknowledge it UNLIKE the Trumpkins Wow, the level of self-satisfied smugness is off the charts', ">>{CassiopeiaStillLife} : It's either a nothingburger or it's Watergate on steroids.", ">>{Jimstein} : I think I did this last time, but maybe I just restored from iTunes without doing the full wipe. I'll do it again, hoping this time it works!", ">>{shhhhquiet} : Holy shit. No. White people who're voting for Trump are doing so knowing they'll be relatively insulated from his worst abuses. You vote for Trump, you're throwing black and hispanic Americans under a bus. That's the ultimate exercise of privilege: the luxury of not caring what will happen to *them* because it won't happen to *you.*", ">>{iakt} : Thing is, what I meant, is that the phone is without cache etc when you are logged out and it's wiped. The moment you login- different cache stuffs begin. The limit on when iOS is starting to self-clean caches etc is when the phone has less than 1gb available.", ">>{Techsupportvictim} : Check your email. Gmail in particular doesn't delete, it archives. And the default is to have that archive on device (gmail calls it all mail). I've seen huge folders on folks devices", ">>{iciale} : They have to take out more pawns first. Trump is the king on this chessboard, not very powerful, tries to hide behind everyone else. Bannon is the real key, he's the Queen on the board. Makes all the moves. Take him out and the King is open.", '>>{CrazyRusFW} : Good luck with that... I am really wondering what will happen on the 9th with all charged up people', '>>{UvonTheDeplorable} : No. I plan on haranguing conservatives with him for years to come.', '>>{Jimstein} : I don\'t have Gmail installed, but maybe I\'ll look into clearing my native mail app. However, Safari says that it\'s only using 72 MB of data. And the thing here is that, I\'ve seen the "huge folder" sizes of some of my apps, mainly messages and music, and it just doesn\'t add up. The fact that you were able to see the large file size is normal and probably how it should be. I\'m guessing there is a cache or something that just isn\'t showing up in the storage view. Thanks for the tip though!', '>>{Positive_pressure} : I honestly could not tell if they are being sarcastic.', ">>{ME24601} : Rush Limbaugh isn't popular on a subreddit known for being popular with left leaning people? *Obviously* a conspiracy...", '>>{Jimstein} : So what you\'re saying is, I would need to use my phone from scratch, without restoring from back up after wiping, in order for those caches to really be gone? When I have looked at the backup folders on my computer, there are three subfolders and the total file size adds up to around 9 gigs, which is still less than my 11ish gigs of "used" memory. The three subfolders could be three separate backups though.', ">>{not__banksy} : I'm not a fan of him either. It's just one of many examples.", ">>{mattreyu} : Hard to say. They're at the limit of -100 comment karma, so probably.", '>>{hobbes305} : No matter how the GOP tries to deny it, Trump and the GOP will be forever linked in the minds of the American electorate.', '>>{EightsOfClubs} : Then can we please call it something else? Flynnsanity or something?', ">>{Anal_Vacuum} : Uh, what. What could Trump possibly do that would be harmful towards blacks or Hispanics as president? You realize they're actually people like you and me, right?", '>>{iciale} : I felt it was quite fitting after the whole "4-D chess" thing', ">>{salmonchaser} : No, we can't forget. We can't let the US forget what they almost got themselves into. This can't happen again.", '>>{shhhhquiet} : You realize systemic racism is a thing, right? And that it is a thing that can get worse and better?', '>>{NemWan} : It took a long time for Watergate to get as big as Watergate. Trumpgate is moving at Interstellar relativistic-time-dilation speed.', ">>{EightsOfClubs} : I feel like we're watching the setup to a season of 24", '>>{miltedmalkball} : He dishes it out both ways: >What’s more frightening than the perversion of our great history is that sensible strong smart Republicans, the very men and women who should be standing up to radical fundamentalism, are so frightened in losing primary battles to religious zealots that they’ve thrown in the towel on sanity. So we get this...', '>>{burgerdog} : Oh yeah, privilege. After the nazi Pepes, the second most important fake issue of our time.', ">>{Anal_Vacuum} : Ah. So you're saying some people might have their feelings hurt it Trump becomes president. I thought it was something serious like jobs being lost.", ">>{TacosEveryCorner} : Let's remember the lessons and never listen to him again.", '>>{nikeomag} : no, lets not, the republican party needs to be tied to trump for the foreseeable future.', '>>{fairbackpacker} : Remember he happened, but give him no more attention.', ">>{shhhhquiet} : Nope. I'm talking about lives made substantially worse. Are you one of those people who believe racism is over? Or that white people are its main victims?", '>>{moleratical} : While no longer common knowledge , Barry Goldwater is still remembered as that kook who represented the emergence of the new right. Trump is 10 times worse than Goldwater could ever be.', '>>{Anal_Vacuum} : And how exactly would their lives be made worse? And how would Donald Trump be the one to make it worse? Race relations have gotten worse under Obama, but nobody seems to talk about that.', '>>{improbablewobble} : What a craven way of looking at the world.', '>>{Standup4yourrites} : This is actually very profound and accurate. The GOP should use this as a bench mark of what NEVER TO LET HAPPEN AGAIN.', '>>{DrQAlias} : But then how will people know what we mean when we say "The Party of Trump?"', ">>{teapot112} : Oh no. The GOP is definitely going to pretend trump never happened. And its actually bad to let people forget about this trump phenomena. Trump opened a can of worms from GOP that pretty much proved that the values they preach are pretty much bullshit and they only use them for political purposes and nothing more. Whenever these high horse republican voters talk high and mighty about liberals or independents, make them remember about Trump. Don't fucking let the republicans forget about Trump.", ">>{hessians4hire} : oh no, I'm hanging this albatross around their neck like it's an ascot on a hipster.", '>>{EightsOfClubs} : YEArs of reading Reddit and overreacting to every little "biggest thing ever" story have kind of left me numb to stuff like this. Why do I get the feeling that we\'ll be looking back at this in 2018 it\'s shrugging about how rocky of a start the president got off to? I mean... I hope something comes of it, I just don\'t want to get my hopes up again.', '>>{shhhhquiet} : Oh I don\'t know, how about all the republican state governments who have pushing through election policies the courts have ruled are obviously and specifically geared towards disenfranchising black people? That could happen at a national level, and he could appoint justices as racist as he is who\'ll rubber stamp the policies as they\'re challenged. Race relations have "gotten worse" because a lot of white people see one black president as a threat to their comfortable status quo.', '>>{janethefish} : The real issue with using this is elections are over a year away for the House, and years away for the Presidency. Honestly, I think its time to start up the message the GOP is so corrupt they were willing to support an obvious Russian stooge. If they\'re willing to sell out to Russia how the hell can you trust them? Add a heaping of "rigged system", and specifically target the GOP\'s efforts to rig voting and the failure to prosecute or seriously investigate the Trump admin. The one thing this election showed is to bring down someone the serious of the scandal is NOT what matters. What you need is focused repetition, and insinuation of there being a problem. That\'s why using a personal email account did more damage to Hillary than all of Donald\'s vastly more serious scandals combined.', ">>{putinspuppet} : This will be the greatest presidential scandal, believe me☝️So much bigger than the failing Watergate ✋️ let me tell you 👌 All of my hotels are rigged with the best sound and video 🖐 the very best 👌 and the greateat hackers, big league, from all of the best countries are doing a terrific job ☝️ just amazing 👌 believe me, this will be a yuge scandal 🤚 like nothing you've ever seen! 🤞", '>>{Felix_Ezra} : No. We can\'t just "forget" this happened. America can\'t pretend this isn\'t part of its societal fabric. This exists in your country, and ignoring it isn\'t what you should do. Lionizing it and giving it free media isn\'t what you should do either. You should recognize it exists and fight back against it. To pretend this didn\'t happen is to stick your head in the sand of the immense problems America faces, where a little fascist had a whole political party capitulate to him and he\'s going to win close to 40% of the vote.', '>>{SuperFreshSuperClean} : Ya all that hard work you Boomers put into AFFORDABLE college, housing and living costs and subsequently lucking into a high-paying corporate career because of who you knew or were friends with during 80s-90s ecnomic boom really gives you guys a hell of a pedestal upon which to look down on us lazy, non-contributive millenials. I for one am glad to have finally found someone one who fully understands and appreciates their privilege to guide us indolent ner-do-wells into the privileged light.', '>>{1800Feelsbadman} : He will have Trump TV or be the US President so it will be kind of hard to forget him. 3 years from now the Republican Primary will put Donald Trump in the past and probably elect someone like Mark Cuban then most voters will forget about Trump.', '>>{xjayroox} : Can I vote that we hold it against the Republicans for at least a decade? They literally nominated a racist, misogynistic, habitual sexual assaulter to be president of the United fucking States of America Everyone who supports him deserves to (politically) suffer for years to come', '>>{Rizzoriginal} : Are you kidding? I have a list of forty people that will be getting daily emails reminding them that trump lost for the next four years. You rub a dogs nose in shit if you want to train them not to shit in the middle of their democracy.', '>>{ImAHackDontLaugh} : Purity tests and "both parties are the same DAE le corporatists?"', ">>{rk119} : >Oh no. The GOP is definitely going to pretend trump never happened. They're already pretending he doesn't happen, moments after he drops a bombshell on live television. We're going to need to keep reminding them, because the Republican elephant always forgets and has late stage Alzheimer's.", ">>{bexmex} : Ok, the title is off... he isn't saying to ignore Trump happened. He is saying when speaking to Trump VOTERS don't assume they are awful people. I agree... Trump is and always has been a con man. Trump doesn't have SUPPORTERS, Trump only has VICTIMS. So be nice to those tricked into voting for Trump.", '>>{dajesus77} : I think you meant to say Jew, instead of Wall St banker. FTFY', ">>{dajesus77} : 29th, the day after Trump's loss in the election.", '>>{dajesus77} : And while we are at it, lets remind everyone about the GOP and Palin.', '>>{TheTeenageOldman} : Nope, sorry, no forgetting, no forgiving.', ">>{JamesElliott98} : It's so sick how the DNC emails were released by Russia but the RNC had 0 emails leaked. It's obvious who the plant is.", ">>{CassiopeiaStillLife} : If nothing else, this is a *hell* of a rocky start. And Trump isn't getting any saner.", '>>{JamesElliott98} : Next week, on 24: Jack has to go after a rogue potus after fleeing to one of our biggest enemies. Tune in next time to see the exciting conclusion!', '>>{Scarlettail} : What a dumb idea. Why forget what is still relevant?', '>>{Ionic_Pancakes} : If he truly is the death knell of the GOP like some people think he is the man will be in the history books.', '>>{JamesElliott98} : Hillary had her election stolen from her because of Trump working with Russia, and Comey. We should all be MAD AS HELL about it!!!!', '>>{EightsOfClubs} : If I recall there was a season where he took down VPOTUS.', '>>{11110000q} : ah... the old anti-semite counter argument to anything... Does he/she hate X? they must hate Jews or Blacks', ">>{the_dog1} : So. With Watergate we had the president giving a wink and nudge style order for his people to steal Democrats info. And then converted it up. With kremlingate. We had everyone around a presidental candidate chatting it up with Russian spies, as those spies actively worked via illegal election work to help that canidate. What the candidate was aware of is yet to be decided. And then the candidate coveted it all up as president. I'm going to conclude kremlingate is bigger.", ">>{ImAHackDontLaugh} : Ug... yeah, sure. Anyways I'm just glad I got to show those third-way neoliberals I wasn't just gonna line up behind their coronation candidate - Al Gore.", '>>{Thief_of_Souls} : Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it', '>>{Pyroteknik} : Not her election, and that attitude kept many people from voting for her. Russians played dirty, but she was a sorry candidate of it made the difference between victory and defeat.', '>>{rtb8} : People said the same about Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman. People forget and take one step further into crazy town.', '>>{buzzlightlime} : Trump will be forever tattooed onto the faces of the republican party.', '>>{ricdesi} : Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it. ---', '>>{so--what} : Losing is an active verb that obfuscates a candidate\'s part in an election. "Being elected (or not)" is a passive form that correctly expresses that the candidate is the one to whom the action is done. In this case the action is *electing*, and it\'s done by the electorate, not the candidate. This is how "losing" in politics is different from losing in sports : the result isn\'t up to the candidate and doesn\'t reflect their merit. Rather, it expresses the choice of the electorate. If, *ex hypothesi*, they don\'t choose smart people, it says more about them than the people they don\'t choose. People should be judged on their actions. Since "not being elected" is no more an action than "being rained on", one can\'t be blamed or praised for it.', ">>{Donald_J_Putin} : I would think it's not as big of a deal as selling arms to Iran illegally... but Trump is worse than Reagan.", '>>{Donald_J_Putin} : Dont fret. Once this Trump stuff dies down, we will start getting more articles about how great Bernie supporters are fighting the dems in California and how great it is.', '>>{manzoire} : There will be trump deniers like there are holocaust deniers.', ">>{miltedmalkball} : I don't disagree with you, but I do think there is an element of practicality involved in politics that is reflected in election results. That is, the far right is clearly willing to lie and mud sling their way to victory, while the left lags behind in recognizing that that type of behavior is apparently what the electorate wants. Sadly, people want reality TV, not C-SPAN.", '>>{dustlesswalnut} : Just think of how low the bar is for Republicans now. Trump is losing this because of a sex scandal, not because of his complete lack of basic qualifications for the job.', '>>{Wowistheword} : How liberals wish Down vote me you shillary bots :)', '>>{johncheswick} : With Watergate, we had 40 government officials indicted or jailed and a presidential resignation. It was far far bigger than this is currently.', ">>{ImAHackDontLaugh} : That article was ridiculous because the only source for it was some dude's Facebook post. Yet it was front page in all 20 of the Bernie subreddits. And you wonder how we got to the fake news era.", '>>{Nathan1266} : I thought Palin was a gift, but goddamn trump is just not even fair', ">>{richardleosimones} : (don't ask about Hillary selling uranium to Russia)", '>>{SanchoAnchovy} : No need. The [Bush-off machine](http://driftglass.blogspot.com.au/2010/09/now-bush-belly-sneetches.html?showComment=1284915235791&m=1) will go back into action, and by June next year every Trump supporter will be a #nevertrump Ted Cruz loyalist, and always will have been. The media will gratefully return to both-siderism and act like Trump was an outlier that somehow took over the GOP against the wishes of the moderate, reasonable base.', ">>{TheJonnyDanger} : They always get whiskydicked when it's their turn to fuck. Look at 2009-10 when they had control of everything but could barely get a Republican healthcare plan passed. Maybe because they have a big tent pursuing many issues that produces infighting between causes?", '>>{suugakusha} : Watergate was nothing compared to this. Honestly, if someone got caught doing what happened with Nixon, it would just get pushed off of the news cycle in one day. This is orders of magnitude worse.', '>>{1800Feelsbadman} : All depends They said that about Donald Trump who will do just as well as Mitt Romney it looks like.', ">>{davidsakh} : Oh man, that's comparable. If they get enough uranium they might become a nuclear power.... Oh, that's right. They already have enough nuclear firepower to destroy most life on earth.", ">>{treeGuerin} : He probably would've lost without the scandal. I'm a republican and I wasn't planning on voting for him long before the sex scandal.", '>>{tedisme} : The polls suggest he was losing because of the first debate, which is slightly more comforting.', ">>{Donald_J_Putin} : > And you wonder how we got to the fake news era. I think it's more about a technological shift than a social change.", '>>{SnoopDrug} : How the fuck is it already bigger? 1. Watergate had actual evidence of Nixon being involved, not indirect connections. 2. Watergate was a full blown global scandal (Trump\'s Russia ties aren\'t a main story globally atm), and lead to the actual resignation of the president, not the NSA. 3. There were actual tapes found during the Watergate controversy, there was direct media evidence. Dozens of people were indicted, the scale of Watergate was massive. This has the potential to get bigger. But saying it is "bigger than watergate" already is absurd hyperbole. Fucking look at Nixon\'s approval ratings at the time.', ">>{Ruslan124} : I wish I could give you more upvotes for the brilliant use of hand emoji's", ">>{GaboKopiBrown} : Decades. Centuries if I live long enough and they're still around.", '>>{jewthe3rd} : I agree, the media needs to pin the blame on both the GOP & Trump Administration', ">>{dose_response} : You know what? You have a really hard job and I respect that you're still trying. I mean, trying to find a way to make this seem insignificant is quite a challenge. Deflection is a solid tactic when you can't defend yourself, so you are on the right track. It's kind of hard to use Hillary Clinton at this point, since she isn't involved in this story in any way.", '>>{richardleosimones} : Job? I do this for fun and love of country', '>>{eh_politico} : The problem is we view them as opponents, bound by the same rules. They are our enemies. And the rules are what you can do to your enemy and what you can stop them from doing to you.', '>>{ramonycajones} : Why did Hillary own uranium in the first place? Did she keep it in her attic? I want to get to the bottom of this, since apparently she unilaterally just handed this over to Putin.', ">>{tedisme} : Trump's doing at least a little worse than Romney, but Cuban wouldn't even get through the primaries. Not fringe enough for the Trumpites and not enough experience for the sane ones.", '>>{Just_For_Da_Lulz} : > giant festering ~~scar~~ anal fissure FTFY', ">>{ramonycajones} : That's great, but it doesn't absolve them of repeatedly lying about being in contact with Russia, *while* Russia was interfering in the election.", '>>{FickellNippleTickle} : You\'re right. A better generalization would be the average subscriber to this subreddit. >"Republicans have been dominating elections lately. Fact." "Gerrymandering is literally the only reason why" >"Hillary lost, get over it" RUSSSSSSSSIIIIIAAAA', '>>{Just_For_Da_Lulz} : Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it', '>>{dose_response} : Huh ... so you post inane, out-of-touch stuff for free? Errr, ok.', ">>{kintops} : Oops, never mind. Didn't realize who I was writing to. Have a swell day.", '>>{Xenocidegs} : The entire State Department and multiple other agencies were involved but sure throw out completely baseless attacks.', '>>{Just_For_Da_Lulz} : Although it\'s much less comforting that (supposed) "family values" Republicans and conservatives are *still* supporting him.', ">>{Just_For_Da_Lulz} : True, but the fact he's still polling around 40% even after *several* scandals is pretty scary.", ">>{Homerpaintbucket} : Honestly, I think the 0 emails link is why the GOP is so complacent with what Trump is doing now. Putin clearly has a lot of dirt on the GOP establishment. And I'm not talking about them ordering pizza. I would put money that the Russians have emails about election fraud in the rust belt.", ">>{tedisme} : We'll see. Testing the limits of partisanship isn't, in and of itself, a bad thing. If he actually gets 34-37% on election day, that might get some of these bible humpers to wake up and smell the Folger's.", ">>{zomgtehvikings} : No, let's remember this shit constantly so it never happens again.", ">>{Just_For_Da_Lulz} : Abso-fucking-lutely. [Here's a list.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Donald_Trump_presidential_campaign_endorsements,_2016)", ">>{DrQAlias} : They are bad people. They need to go start a new political party if they're good people, because the one they're in is ruined. I'll add, nothing they are concerned about actually matters, either because it's a bunch of lies or because they have evil racist bigoted agendas. They are hypocrites and do not know what is best for them, and they've finally demonstrated it. The best we can do is ignore them and prevent them from having any political power. Not because this will make bad things happen to them, but because they will be *fine* and don't realize it.", '>>{kiramis} : Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it', '>>{Our0b0ros} : So what your telling me is, Democrats, think news about a Republican presidency is a big scandal? What a fucking shock.', ">>{richardleosimones} : I learned from watching Democrats! Aren't you proud?", '>>{jewthe3rd} : The GOP just legalize it. Read: [House Joint Resolution 38] (https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-joint-resolution/38?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22LatestMajorActionCode%3A28000%22%5D%7D&r=4) [House Joint Resolution 41] (https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-joint-resolution/41?r=1) Both signed by President Trump on Monday February 13th 2017.', ">>{GudSpellar} : This could actually backfire terribly. NPR is now reporting [Intelligence Official: Transcripts Of Flynn's Calls Don't Show Criminal Wrongdoing](http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/02/15/515437291/intelligence-official-transcripts-of-flynns-calls-dont-show-criminal-wrongdoing) It is impossible to tell what's what right now. But if it turns out this was mostly political and there was nothing really inappropriate in Flynn's calls, there is going to be some major blowback against the intel community, news media, Democrats who pushed for his dismissal, and possibly even holdovers from the prior administration currently serving in different roles. That would be bad for America, imho, perhaps even worse than if it turns out Flynn was in detailed negotiations over sanctions before formally assuming his position.", ">>{ZMathblasterZ} : I feel like if Hillary was president we wouldn't be talking about this. You know, because the CGI would be doing so much legitimate good and not buying weddings with their multi-international pool of bribery money.", ">>{Trunkington} : How did Russia 'interfere' with the election?", ">>{ZMathblasterZ} : You're right! That makes it **BIGGER** than Watergate! [Nobody has ever tried that thing you said before](http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2006/oct/27/20061027-084248-4386r/) Bigger than WATERGATE!!!!!", '>>{Majnum} : The costumer always got it right!! Take what you ask 😋', '>>{newlackofbravery} : They got an autopsy in 2012 that was supposed to be a wake up call. Theyre not gonna learn, theyre going to go down and go down hard.', ">>{Whiskeyonice} : Before my time, but wasn't Hillary kicked off a Watergate investigation team because she was a lying scumbag?", '>>{SexLiesAndExercise} : Ehhhh. I really doubt it. Intentional gerrymandering and "voter fraud" disenfranchisement, maybe. Election fraud is seriously quite hard to get away with.', '>>{bexmex} : You may be correct, but you are very unpersuasive. Why should a good person in the Republican party believe you? Trump may or may not be an aberration.', ">>{Homerpaintbucket} : honestly, I would have said it wasn't likely 6 months ago, but I don't know anymore. I have no faith the GOP is committed to our system at all and I'm really starting to think that [this video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1284ARxFag) might not be as alarmist as I once thought. There is something going on.", '>>{OneReportersOpinion} : I don\'t know if the deep state will let them. I just want to see some real evidence. I\'m kinda of tired of people saying "You wouldn\'t believe the stuff I\'ve seen!" Someone needs to go on record and say what exactly they have and how they know it', ">>{DrQAlias} : No argument there. But I look at this as a turning point that tells me Republicans truly can't be persuaded to the other side, and the goal now is to make it so persuading them is unnecessary. With large enough majorities they can be ignored, and progressive policies will not and should not hurt them. Allowing gay people to retain the right to marry, letting immigrants into the country and become a part of society, having police officers kill black people a little less frequently, and taxing rich people more will not impact their lives negatively in the slightest, despite what they believe. When they see their lives are better, they will either be convinced or not.", '>>{bexmex} : Ah, but the goal is also to convince Republican LEADERS to stop acting like such insane idiots. They can indeed be convinced: many already have dumped Trump. Democrats could act all smug and just say, "we dont need your vote, because you\'re dying off like flies and the younger generation is sick of your crap." But then Republican leader will dig in and cause a lot of damage on their way down... and if they DONT act like nihilists, they\'d be replaced by someone who is. Like Trump. If instead you were magnanimous in victory, it will give Republican leaders some cover to be reasonable. They\'ll seize on it like a drowning man, and we\'ll be able to fix things faster.', '>>{jjmc123a} : Actually, rubbing a dogs nose in shit is stupid. They just think, "well yes, that is my shit, so what?".', ">>{OneReportersOpinion} : How come Hillary couldn't beat a candidate she basically hand-chose?", ">>{OneReportersOpinion} : Yep. A lot of people are just eating up the junk food that Russia ha infiltrated the government without thinking about what is really going on. The FBI and the CIA/intelligence community are basically in a war with each other. We shouldn't just accept anonymous claims, especially from the CIA of all places", ">>{OneReportersOpinion} : If that's true, why can't someone who can actually prove it come and put their name on the record?", ">>{OneReportersOpinion} : I agree. This is way too hysterical. I'm so tired of people alluding to big revelations they've heard about secondhand and the refusing to say what they are. The fact that no one is willing to go on record makes me very skeptical", ">>{OneReportersOpinion} : That's not fair to the rest of us who have to suffer Trump. If you don't like Trump, you should be very unhappy that Hillary didn't do her job, which was to beat him.", ">>{rdevaughn} : I'm unhappy that the DNC chose to embrace the ideology Hillary personified. They and she diverged from the righteous path long ago.", '>>{GudSpellar} : This is crazy. From the headlines, I assumed there was fire underneath all the smoke. The more I read and the more information emerges, however, the more it is beginning to appear that smoke is blowing away and there is nothing there.', ">>{OneReportersOpinion} : I don't know, I think something might be there. There should be a complete and transparent investigation.", ">>{the_dog1} : Well yeah. That's just because Watergate had completly played out. Those officials went to jail over a long time period. We are in the first real week of kremlingate here. The root issue behind it is much bigger though.", ">>{putinspuppet} : Terrible 👌🖖 impression of me 🤚 Sad! 👐 I have the best hand gestures 👐 ask Rosie, she'll tell you 👉 👏 👋 I thought Rosie was bad, but maybe now I like her after your comment 👐👌✋️✋️ the worst comment, just terrible✋️🤚after that terrible comment I just want you to pray for the apprentice ratings 🤞👐 because bigly yuge 👌🤚massive crowds at the inauguration and also 👐👐👌fake news!"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{Positive_pressure} : Privilege: Many Jill Stein Voters Have It, and Many Hillary Clinton Voters Do, Too', '>>{Deadeyebyby} : Why the need to post this two weeks after it being written?', ">>{Positive_pressure} : I just found out about it today on The Jimmy Dore Show: [Shocker: Who's Voting For Jill Stein? Not Who You Think!](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hn5-xXeC95U)", ">>{progresstogether} : Clinton voters by and large have EARNED the privllege that we have. Unlike Trumpkins, we worked hard and went to college and got degrees. We contribute to the knowledge economy and the creative economy. Yeah, some of us pro-Clinton people were born with privilege, but those people acknowledge it UNLIKE the Trumpkins, who think that the way they were born makes them entitled to find a job and make a living. What a joke this article is. The mods aren't doing there job. I think I'll have to write them an email so they can wake up.", ">>{aKindWordandaGun} : I'm sure the 85-87% of black voters supporting Clinton to Trump's 1-2% and 70% to 19% of Latino voters will find those claims very interesting.", '>>{Positive_pressure} : Voting for status quo candidate is the most privileged thing you can do.', '>>{mattreyu} : > Clinton voters by and large have EARNED the privllege that we have. > Yeah, some of us pro-Clinton people were born with privilege, but those people acknowledge it UNLIKE the Trumpkins Wow, the level of self-satisfied smugness is off the charts', ">>{shhhhquiet} : Holy shit. No. White people who're voting for Trump are doing so knowing they'll be relatively insulated from his worst abuses. You vote for Trump, you're throwing black and hispanic Americans under a bus. That's the ultimate exercise of privilege: the luxury of not caring what will happen to *them* because it won't happen to *you.*", '>>{Positive_pressure} : I honestly could not tell if they are being sarcastic.', ">>{mattreyu} : Hard to say. They're at the limit of -100 comment karma, so probably.", ">>{Anal_Vacuum} : Uh, what. What could Trump possibly do that would be harmful towards blacks or Hispanics as president? You realize they're actually people like you and me, right?", '>>{shhhhquiet} : You realize systemic racism is a thing, right? And that it is a thing that can get worse and better?', '>>{burgerdog} : Oh yeah, privilege. After the nazi Pepes, the second most important fake issue of our time.', ">>{Anal_Vacuum} : Ah. So you're saying some people might have their feelings hurt it Trump becomes president. I thought it was something serious like jobs being lost.", ">>{shhhhquiet} : Nope. I'm talking about lives made substantially worse. Are you one of those people who believe racism is over? Or that white people are its main victims?", '>>{Anal_Vacuum} : And how exactly would their lives be made worse? And how would Donald Trump be the one to make it worse? Race relations have gotten worse under Obama, but nobody seems to talk about that.', '>>{shhhhquiet} : Oh I don\'t know, how about all the republican state governments who have pushing through election policies the courts have ruled are obviously and specifically geared towards disenfranchising black people? That could happen at a national level, and he could appoint justices as racist as he is who\'ll rubber stamp the policies as they\'re challenged. Race relations have "gotten worse" because a lot of white people see one black president as a threat to their comfortable status quo.', '>>{SuperFreshSuperClean} : Ya all that hard work you Boomers put into AFFORDABLE college, housing and living costs and subsequently lucking into a high-paying corporate career because of who you knew or were friends with during 80s-90s ecnomic boom really gives you guys a hell of a pedestal upon which to look down on us lazy, non-contributive millenials. I for one am glad to have finally found someone one who fully understands and appreciates their privilege to guide us indolent ner-do-wells into the privileged light.'], [">>{GAforTrump} : Don't Panic, Folks! The Establishment Is Supposed to Be Against Trump", ">>{Firetrucker} : TL;DR: Repblicans aren't supposed to like Trump, no one is and that's how he's going to win! No, I'm not back on the pills... what?", ">>{gonzone} : Rush needs to go back to the Dominican Republic and take more Viagra there. I hereby promise, from this day forward, to solemnly downvote every link to Rush. It's the only right thing to do.", '>>{not__banksy} : I see people are here to Correct the Record.', ">>{danelectro15} : Yup if anyone disagrees with you it's a conspiracy!", '>>{Firetrucker} : What is being corrected? Rusty is wrong? The GOP loves Trump?', ">>{not__banksy} : Over 90% of all articles in r/politics with more than 10 points are anti-Trump. Find three pro-Trump articles here in the last week that is anything positive for Trump. I never claimed a conspiracy, it's well-known CTR has soent over $6million so far for social media propaganda.", ">>{danelectro15} : Maybe it's because Trump has been saying the most insane things we've ever heard in a presidential election and the public is reacting accordingly? That is a much simpler explanation.", ">>{Firetrucker} : Um. Find a positive Trump story? He's kinda fucking everything up is the problem, so much so Limbaugh has to pretend it's all part of the plan.", ">>{ME24601} : Rush Limbaugh isn't popular on a subreddit known for being popular with left leaning people? *Obviously* a conspiracy...", ">>{not__banksy} : I'm not a fan of him either. It's just one of many examples."], [">>{TheOrangeGroper} : On Nov. 9, Let's Forget Donald Trump Happened", '>>{Majnum} : Please NOT! If we forget It would happens again!', '>>{Loxodontist} : Agreed. He needs to fade away from the body politic. In a perfect world, the only thing we hear about Trump after the election is his death.', '>>{11110000q} : i.e the Wall Street banker press wishes to propagate a reality of it is all done and over', '>>{CrazyRusFW} : Good luck with that... I am really wondering what will happen on the 9th with all charged up people', '>>{UvonTheDeplorable} : No. I plan on haranguing conservatives with him for years to come.', '>>{hobbes305} : No matter how the GOP tries to deny it, Trump and the GOP will be forever linked in the minds of the American electorate.', ">>{salmonchaser} : No, we can't forget. We can't let the US forget what they almost got themselves into. This can't happen again.", ">>{TacosEveryCorner} : Let's remember the lessons and never listen to him again.", '>>{nikeomag} : no, lets not, the republican party needs to be tied to trump for the foreseeable future.', '>>{fairbackpacker} : Remember he happened, but give him no more attention.', '>>{moleratical} : While no longer common knowledge , Barry Goldwater is still remembered as that kook who represented the emergence of the new right. Trump is 10 times worse than Goldwater could ever be.', '>>{improbablewobble} : What a craven way of looking at the world.', '>>{Standup4yourrites} : This is actually very profound and accurate. The GOP should use this as a bench mark of what NEVER TO LET HAPPEN AGAIN.', '>>{DrQAlias} : But then how will people know what we mean when we say "The Party of Trump?"', ">>{teapot112} : Oh no. The GOP is definitely going to pretend trump never happened. And its actually bad to let people forget about this trump phenomena. Trump opened a can of worms from GOP that pretty much proved that the values they preach are pretty much bullshit and they only use them for political purposes and nothing more. Whenever these high horse republican voters talk high and mighty about liberals or independents, make them remember about Trump. Don't fucking let the republicans forget about Trump.", ">>{hessians4hire} : oh no, I'm hanging this albatross around their neck like it's an ascot on a hipster.", '>>{Felix_Ezra} : No. We can\'t just "forget" this happened. America can\'t pretend this isn\'t part of its societal fabric. This exists in your country, and ignoring it isn\'t what you should do. Lionizing it and giving it free media isn\'t what you should do either. You should recognize it exists and fight back against it. To pretend this didn\'t happen is to stick your head in the sand of the immense problems America faces, where a little fascist had a whole political party capitulate to him and he\'s going to win close to 40% of the vote.', '>>{1800Feelsbadman} : He will have Trump TV or be the US President so it will be kind of hard to forget him. 3 years from now the Republican Primary will put Donald Trump in the past and probably elect someone like Mark Cuban then most voters will forget about Trump.', '>>{xjayroox} : Can I vote that we hold it against the Republicans for at least a decade? They literally nominated a racist, misogynistic, habitual sexual assaulter to be president of the United fucking States of America Everyone who supports him deserves to (politically) suffer for years to come', '>>{Rizzoriginal} : Are you kidding? I have a list of forty people that will be getting daily emails reminding them that trump lost for the next four years. You rub a dogs nose in shit if you want to train them not to shit in the middle of their democracy.', ">>{rk119} : >Oh no. The GOP is definitely going to pretend trump never happened. They're already pretending he doesn't happen, moments after he drops a bombshell on live television. We're going to need to keep reminding them, because the Republican elephant always forgets and has late stage Alzheimer's.", ">>{bexmex} : Ok, the title is off... he isn't saying to ignore Trump happened. He is saying when speaking to Trump VOTERS don't assume they are awful people. I agree... Trump is and always has been a con man. Trump doesn't have SUPPORTERS, Trump only has VICTIMS. So be nice to those tricked into voting for Trump.", '>>{dajesus77} : I think you meant to say Jew, instead of Wall St banker. FTFY', ">>{dajesus77} : 29th, the day after Trump's loss in the election.", '>>{dajesus77} : And while we are at it, lets remind everyone about the GOP and Palin.', '>>{TheTeenageOldman} : Nope, sorry, no forgetting, no forgiving.', '>>{Scarlettail} : What a dumb idea. Why forget what is still relevant?', '>>{Ionic_Pancakes} : If he truly is the death knell of the GOP like some people think he is the man will be in the history books.', '>>{11110000q} : ah... the old anti-semite counter argument to anything... Does he/she hate X? they must hate Jews or Blacks', '>>{Thief_of_Souls} : Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it', '>>{rtb8} : People said the same about Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman. People forget and take one step further into crazy town.', '>>{buzzlightlime} : Trump will be forever tattooed onto the faces of the republican party.', '>>{ricdesi} : Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it. ---', '>>{manzoire} : There will be trump deniers like there are holocaust deniers.', '>>{dustlesswalnut} : Just think of how low the bar is for Republicans now. Trump is losing this because of a sex scandal, not because of his complete lack of basic qualifications for the job.', '>>{Wowistheword} : How liberals wish Down vote me you shillary bots :)', '>>{Nathan1266} : I thought Palin was a gift, but goddamn trump is just not even fair', '>>{SanchoAnchovy} : No need. The [Bush-off machine](http://driftglass.blogspot.com.au/2010/09/now-bush-belly-sneetches.html?showComment=1284915235791&m=1) will go back into action, and by June next year every Trump supporter will be a #nevertrump Ted Cruz loyalist, and always will have been. The media will gratefully return to both-siderism and act like Trump was an outlier that somehow took over the GOP against the wishes of the moderate, reasonable base.', '>>{1800Feelsbadman} : All depends They said that about Donald Trump who will do just as well as Mitt Romney it looks like.', ">>{treeGuerin} : He probably would've lost without the scandal. I'm a republican and I wasn't planning on voting for him long before the sex scandal.", '>>{tedisme} : The polls suggest he was losing because of the first debate, which is slightly more comforting.', ">>{GaboKopiBrown} : Decades. Centuries if I live long enough and they're still around.", ">>{tedisme} : Trump's doing at least a little worse than Romney, but Cuban wouldn't even get through the primaries. Not fringe enough for the Trumpites and not enough experience for the sane ones.", '>>{Just_For_Da_Lulz} : > giant festering ~~scar~~ anal fissure FTFY', '>>{Just_For_Da_Lulz} : Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it', '>>{Just_For_Da_Lulz} : Although it\'s much less comforting that (supposed) "family values" Republicans and conservatives are *still* supporting him.', ">>{Just_For_Da_Lulz} : True, but the fact he's still polling around 40% even after *several* scandals is pretty scary.", ">>{tedisme} : We'll see. Testing the limits of partisanship isn't, in and of itself, a bad thing. If he actually gets 34-37% on election day, that might get some of these bible humpers to wake up and smell the Folger's.", ">>{zomgtehvikings} : No, let's remember this shit constantly so it never happens again.", ">>{Just_For_Da_Lulz} : Abso-fucking-lutely. [Here's a list.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Donald_Trump_presidential_campaign_endorsements,_2016)", ">>{DrQAlias} : They are bad people. They need to go start a new political party if they're good people, because the one they're in is ruined. I'll add, nothing they are concerned about actually matters, either because it's a bunch of lies or because they have evil racist bigoted agendas. They are hypocrites and do not know what is best for them, and they've finally demonstrated it. The best we can do is ignore them and prevent them from having any political power. Not because this will make bad things happen to them, but because they will be *fine* and don't realize it.", '>>{kiramis} : Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it', '>>{Majnum} : The costumer always got it right!! Take what you ask 😋', '>>{newlackofbravery} : They got an autopsy in 2012 that was supposed to be a wake up call. Theyre not gonna learn, theyre going to go down and go down hard.', '>>{bexmex} : You may be correct, but you are very unpersuasive. Why should a good person in the Republican party believe you? Trump may or may not be an aberration.', ">>{DrQAlias} : No argument there. But I look at this as a turning point that tells me Republicans truly can't be persuaded to the other side, and the goal now is to make it so persuading them is unnecessary. With large enough majorities they can be ignored, and progressive policies will not and should not hurt them. Allowing gay people to retain the right to marry, letting immigrants into the country and become a part of society, having police officers kill black people a little less frequently, and taxing rich people more will not impact their lives negatively in the slightest, despite what they believe. When they see their lives are better, they will either be convinced or not.", '>>{bexmex} : Ah, but the goal is also to convince Republican LEADERS to stop acting like such insane idiots. They can indeed be convinced: many already have dumped Trump. Democrats could act all smug and just say, "we dont need your vote, because you\'re dying off like flies and the younger generation is sick of your crap." But then Republican leader will dig in and cause a lot of damage on their way down... and if they DONT act like nihilists, they\'d be replaced by someone who is. Like Trump. If instead you were magnanimous in victory, it will give Republican leaders some cover to be reasonable. They\'ll seize on it like a drowning man, and we\'ll be able to fix things faster.', '>>{jjmc123a} : Actually, rubbing a dogs nose in shit is stupid. They just think, "well yes, that is my shit, so what?".'], [">>{icnoevil} : DEMOCRATS: Trump's Russia controversy is 'already bigger than Watergate'", '>>{icnoevil} : Democrats have just been handed a pot of gold, but they probably will screw it up.', '>>{miltedmalkball} : As Aaron Sorkin put it >If liberals are so fucking smart, how come they lose so god damn always?', '>>{0ne_Word} : Without a doubt this is bigger. This is Russian intrusion of the Office of the President of the United States. On top of that the POTUS himself may be compromised by Russian intel services. Who knew what and when did they know it? This has to be answered, quickly and fully.', ">>{Atomix117} : I don't really think it is yet. I think it has the potential to be bigger but it isn't yet.", '>>{rdevaughn} : If Aaron Sorkin is so fucking smart, how come Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and the fact that Democrats have [controlled the House and the Senate more times than Republicans, 57-35 and 50-42 respectively](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_divisions_of_United_States_Congresses)?', ">>{CassiopeiaStillLife} : It's either a nothingburger or it's Watergate on steroids.", ">>{iciale} : They have to take out more pawns first. Trump is the king on this chessboard, not very powerful, tries to hide behind everyone else. Bannon is the real key, he's the Queen on the board. Makes all the moves. Take him out and the King is open.", '>>{EightsOfClubs} : Then can we please call it something else? Flynnsanity or something?', '>>{iciale} : I felt it was quite fitting after the whole "4-D chess" thing', '>>{NemWan} : It took a long time for Watergate to get as big as Watergate. Trumpgate is moving at Interstellar relativistic-time-dilation speed.', ">>{EightsOfClubs} : I feel like we're watching the setup to a season of 24", '>>{miltedmalkball} : He dishes it out both ways: >What’s more frightening than the perversion of our great history is that sensible strong smart Republicans, the very men and women who should be standing up to radical fundamentalism, are so frightened in losing primary battles to religious zealots that they’ve thrown in the towel on sanity. So we get this...', '>>{EightsOfClubs} : YEArs of reading Reddit and overreacting to every little "biggest thing ever" story have kind of left me numb to stuff like this. Why do I get the feeling that we\'ll be looking back at this in 2018 it\'s shrugging about how rocky of a start the president got off to? I mean... I hope something comes of it, I just don\'t want to get my hopes up again.', '>>{janethefish} : The real issue with using this is elections are over a year away for the House, and years away for the Presidency. Honestly, I think its time to start up the message the GOP is so corrupt they were willing to support an obvious Russian stooge. If they\'re willing to sell out to Russia how the hell can you trust them? Add a heaping of "rigged system", and specifically target the GOP\'s efforts to rig voting and the failure to prosecute or seriously investigate the Trump admin. The one thing this election showed is to bring down someone the serious of the scandal is NOT what matters. What you need is focused repetition, and insinuation of there being a problem. That\'s why using a personal email account did more damage to Hillary than all of Donald\'s vastly more serious scandals combined.', ">>{putinspuppet} : This will be the greatest presidential scandal, believe me☝️So much bigger than the failing Watergate ✋️ let me tell you 👌 All of my hotels are rigged with the best sound and video 🖐 the very best 👌 and the greateat hackers, big league, from all of the best countries are doing a terrific job ☝️ just amazing 👌 believe me, this will be a yuge scandal 🤚 like nothing you've ever seen! 🤞", '>>{ImAHackDontLaugh} : Purity tests and "both parties are the same DAE le corporatists?"', ">>{JamesElliott98} : It's so sick how the DNC emails were released by Russia but the RNC had 0 emails leaked. It's obvious who the plant is.", ">>{CassiopeiaStillLife} : If nothing else, this is a *hell* of a rocky start. And Trump isn't getting any saner.", '>>{JamesElliott98} : Next week, on 24: Jack has to go after a rogue potus after fleeing to one of our biggest enemies. Tune in next time to see the exciting conclusion!', '>>{JamesElliott98} : Hillary had her election stolen from her because of Trump working with Russia, and Comey. We should all be MAD AS HELL about it!!!!', '>>{EightsOfClubs} : If I recall there was a season where he took down VPOTUS.', ">>{the_dog1} : So. With Watergate we had the president giving a wink and nudge style order for his people to steal Democrats info. And then converted it up. With kremlingate. We had everyone around a presidental candidate chatting it up with Russian spies, as those spies actively worked via illegal election work to help that canidate. What the candidate was aware of is yet to be decided. And then the candidate coveted it all up as president. I'm going to conclude kremlingate is bigger.", ">>{ImAHackDontLaugh} : Ug... yeah, sure. Anyways I'm just glad I got to show those third-way neoliberals I wasn't just gonna line up behind their coronation candidate - Al Gore.", '>>{Pyroteknik} : Not her election, and that attitude kept many people from voting for her. Russians played dirty, but she was a sorry candidate of it made the difference between victory and defeat.', '>>{so--what} : Losing is an active verb that obfuscates a candidate\'s part in an election. "Being elected (or not)" is a passive form that correctly expresses that the candidate is the one to whom the action is done. In this case the action is *electing*, and it\'s done by the electorate, not the candidate. This is how "losing" in politics is different from losing in sports : the result isn\'t up to the candidate and doesn\'t reflect their merit. Rather, it expresses the choice of the electorate. If, *ex hypothesi*, they don\'t choose smart people, it says more about them than the people they don\'t choose. People should be judged on their actions. Since "not being elected" is no more an action than "being rained on", one can\'t be blamed or praised for it.', ">>{Donald_J_Putin} : I would think it's not as big of a deal as selling arms to Iran illegally... but Trump is worse than Reagan.", '>>{Donald_J_Putin} : Dont fret. Once this Trump stuff dies down, we will start getting more articles about how great Bernie supporters are fighting the dems in California and how great it is.', ">>{miltedmalkball} : I don't disagree with you, but I do think there is an element of practicality involved in politics that is reflected in election results. That is, the far right is clearly willing to lie and mud sling their way to victory, while the left lags behind in recognizing that that type of behavior is apparently what the electorate wants. Sadly, people want reality TV, not C-SPAN.", '>>{johncheswick} : With Watergate, we had 40 government officials indicted or jailed and a presidential resignation. It was far far bigger than this is currently.', ">>{ImAHackDontLaugh} : That article was ridiculous because the only source for it was some dude's Facebook post. Yet it was front page in all 20 of the Bernie subreddits. And you wonder how we got to the fake news era.", ">>{richardleosimones} : (don't ask about Hillary selling uranium to Russia)", ">>{TheJonnyDanger} : They always get whiskydicked when it's their turn to fuck. Look at 2009-10 when they had control of everything but could barely get a Republican healthcare plan passed. Maybe because they have a big tent pursuing many issues that produces infighting between causes?", '>>{suugakusha} : Watergate was nothing compared to this. Honestly, if someone got caught doing what happened with Nixon, it would just get pushed off of the news cycle in one day. This is orders of magnitude worse.', ">>{davidsakh} : Oh man, that's comparable. If they get enough uranium they might become a nuclear power.... Oh, that's right. They already have enough nuclear firepower to destroy most life on earth.", ">>{Donald_J_Putin} : > And you wonder how we got to the fake news era. I think it's more about a technological shift than a social change.", '>>{SnoopDrug} : How the fuck is it already bigger? 1. Watergate had actual evidence of Nixon being involved, not indirect connections. 2. Watergate was a full blown global scandal (Trump\'s Russia ties aren\'t a main story globally atm), and lead to the actual resignation of the president, not the NSA. 3. There were actual tapes found during the Watergate controversy, there was direct media evidence. Dozens of people were indicted, the scale of Watergate was massive. This has the potential to get bigger. But saying it is "bigger than watergate" already is absurd hyperbole. Fucking look at Nixon\'s approval ratings at the time.', ">>{Ruslan124} : I wish I could give you more upvotes for the brilliant use of hand emoji's", '>>{jewthe3rd} : I agree, the media needs to pin the blame on both the GOP & Trump Administration', ">>{dose_response} : You know what? You have a really hard job and I respect that you're still trying. I mean, trying to find a way to make this seem insignificant is quite a challenge. Deflection is a solid tactic when you can't defend yourself, so you are on the right track. It's kind of hard to use Hillary Clinton at this point, since she isn't involved in this story in any way.", '>>{richardleosimones} : Job? I do this for fun and love of country', '>>{eh_politico} : The problem is we view them as opponents, bound by the same rules. They are our enemies. And the rules are what you can do to your enemy and what you can stop them from doing to you.', '>>{ramonycajones} : Why did Hillary own uranium in the first place? Did she keep it in her attic? I want to get to the bottom of this, since apparently she unilaterally just handed this over to Putin.', ">>{ramonycajones} : That's great, but it doesn't absolve them of repeatedly lying about being in contact with Russia, *while* Russia was interfering in the election.", '>>{FickellNippleTickle} : You\'re right. A better generalization would be the average subscriber to this subreddit. >"Republicans have been dominating elections lately. Fact." "Gerrymandering is literally the only reason why" >"Hillary lost, get over it" RUSSSSSSSSIIIIIAAAA', '>>{dose_response} : Huh ... so you post inane, out-of-touch stuff for free? Errr, ok.', ">>{kintops} : Oops, never mind. Didn't realize who I was writing to. Have a swell day.", '>>{Xenocidegs} : The entire State Department and multiple other agencies were involved but sure throw out completely baseless attacks.', ">>{Homerpaintbucket} : Honestly, I think the 0 emails link is why the GOP is so complacent with what Trump is doing now. Putin clearly has a lot of dirt on the GOP establishment. And I'm not talking about them ordering pizza. I would put money that the Russians have emails about election fraud in the rust belt.", '>>{Our0b0ros} : So what your telling me is, Democrats, think news about a Republican presidency is a big scandal? What a fucking shock.', ">>{richardleosimones} : I learned from watching Democrats! Aren't you proud?", '>>{jewthe3rd} : The GOP just legalize it. Read: [House Joint Resolution 38] (https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-joint-resolution/38?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22LatestMajorActionCode%3A28000%22%5D%7D&r=4) [House Joint Resolution 41] (https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-joint-resolution/41?r=1) Both signed by President Trump on Monday February 13th 2017.', ">>{GudSpellar} : This could actually backfire terribly. NPR is now reporting [Intelligence Official: Transcripts Of Flynn's Calls Don't Show Criminal Wrongdoing](http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/02/15/515437291/intelligence-official-transcripts-of-flynns-calls-dont-show-criminal-wrongdoing) It is impossible to tell what's what right now. But if it turns out this was mostly political and there was nothing really inappropriate in Flynn's calls, there is going to be some major blowback against the intel community, news media, Democrats who pushed for his dismissal, and possibly even holdovers from the prior administration currently serving in different roles. That would be bad for America, imho, perhaps even worse than if it turns out Flynn was in detailed negotiations over sanctions before formally assuming his position.", ">>{ZMathblasterZ} : I feel like if Hillary was president we wouldn't be talking about this. You know, because the CGI would be doing so much legitimate good and not buying weddings with their multi-international pool of bribery money.", ">>{Trunkington} : How did Russia 'interfere' with the election?", ">>{ZMathblasterZ} : You're right! That makes it **BIGGER** than Watergate! [Nobody has ever tried that thing you said before](http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2006/oct/27/20061027-084248-4386r/) Bigger than WATERGATE!!!!!", ">>{Whiskeyonice} : Before my time, but wasn't Hillary kicked off a Watergate investigation team because she was a lying scumbag?", '>>{SexLiesAndExercise} : Ehhhh. I really doubt it. Intentional gerrymandering and "voter fraud" disenfranchisement, maybe. Election fraud is seriously quite hard to get away with.', ">>{Homerpaintbucket} : honestly, I would have said it wasn't likely 6 months ago, but I don't know anymore. I have no faith the GOP is committed to our system at all and I'm really starting to think that [this video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1284ARxFag) might not be as alarmist as I once thought. There is something going on.", '>>{OneReportersOpinion} : I don\'t know if the deep state will let them. I just want to see some real evidence. I\'m kinda of tired of people saying "You wouldn\'t believe the stuff I\'ve seen!" Someone needs to go on record and say what exactly they have and how they know it', ">>{OneReportersOpinion} : How come Hillary couldn't beat a candidate she basically hand-chose?", ">>{OneReportersOpinion} : Yep. A lot of people are just eating up the junk food that Russia ha infiltrated the government without thinking about what is really going on. The FBI and the CIA/intelligence community are basically in a war with each other. We shouldn't just accept anonymous claims, especially from the CIA of all places", ">>{OneReportersOpinion} : If that's true, why can't someone who can actually prove it come and put their name on the record?", ">>{OneReportersOpinion} : I agree. This is way too hysterical. I'm so tired of people alluding to big revelations they've heard about secondhand and the refusing to say what they are. The fact that no one is willing to go on record makes me very skeptical", ">>{OneReportersOpinion} : That's not fair to the rest of us who have to suffer Trump. If you don't like Trump, you should be very unhappy that Hillary didn't do her job, which was to beat him.", ">>{rdevaughn} : I'm unhappy that the DNC chose to embrace the ideology Hillary personified. They and she diverged from the righteous path long ago.", '>>{GudSpellar} : This is crazy. From the headlines, I assumed there was fire underneath all the smoke. The more I read and the more information emerges, however, the more it is beginning to appear that smoke is blowing away and there is nothing there.', ">>{OneReportersOpinion} : I don't know, I think something might be there. There should be a complete and transparent investigation.", ">>{the_dog1} : Well yeah. That's just because Watergate had completly played out. Those officials went to jail over a long time period. We are in the first real week of kremlingate here. The root issue behind it is much bigger though.", ">>{putinspuppet} : Terrible 👌🖖 impression of me 🤚 Sad! 👐 I have the best hand gestures 👐 ask Rosie, she'll tell you 👉 👏 👋 I thought Rosie was bad, but maybe now I like her after your comment 👐👌✋️✋️ the worst comment, just terrible✋️🤚after that terrible comment I just want you to pray for the apprentice ratings 🤞👐 because bigly yuge 👌🤚massive crowds at the inauguration and also 👐👐👌fake news!"], ['>>{Jimstein} : Around 5.5gb of "Used" memory on my 16GB iPhone 5s is unaccounted for', ">>{BankNasty} : I had the same problem. For me, the photos app wasn't actually deleting photos, yet wasn't displaying them. Check the size of your photos app and make sure it's aligned with how many photos you have.", ">>{Jimstein} : I wish that was it. I have emptied my photos many times over the last few months, even downloaded some apps to try and force clear caches or photo caches. Right now I have about 100 photos and some videos, it's definitely not anywhere close to 5 gigs of content.", '>>{lshaw52} : Try going into iTunes and renting a movie that is huge in space. Try Lord of the Rings:Two Towers. It will tell you that your phone doesnt have enough space to rent. Let that run for a minute and your storage will increase. I will do it right now, and post screenshots of the results. Here you are https://imgur.com/a/RvfD0', ">>{iakt} : http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/how-to-factory-reset-an-iphone/3/ This. Otherwise things will just stay cached no matter how many movies you'll download.", ">>{Jimstein} : Unfortunately I could not get this to work :/ I'm sure it works in some cases but after trying various attempts with this kind of tactic, I could not see any reduction.", ">>{Jimstein} : I think I did this last time, but maybe I just restored from iTunes without doing the full wipe. I'll do it again, hoping this time it works!", ">>{iakt} : Thing is, what I meant, is that the phone is without cache etc when you are logged out and it's wiped. The moment you login- different cache stuffs begin. The limit on when iOS is starting to self-clean caches etc is when the phone has less than 1gb available.", ">>{Techsupportvictim} : Check your email. Gmail in particular doesn't delete, it archives. And the default is to have that archive on device (gmail calls it all mail). I've seen huge folders on folks devices", '>>{Jimstein} : I don\'t have Gmail installed, but maybe I\'ll look into clearing my native mail app. However, Safari says that it\'s only using 72 MB of data. And the thing here is that, I\'ve seen the "huge folder" sizes of some of my apps, mainly messages and music, and it just doesn\'t add up. The fact that you were able to see the large file size is normal and probably how it should be. I\'m guessing there is a cache or something that just isn\'t showing up in the storage view. Thanks for the tip though!', '>>{Jimstein} : So what you\'re saying is, I would need to use my phone from scratch, without restoring from back up after wiping, in order for those caches to really be gone? When I have looked at the backup folders on my computer, there are three subfolders and the total file size adds up to around 9 gigs, which is still less than my 11ish gigs of "used" memory. The three subfolders could be three separate backups though.']]

classify and reply

['>>{blueshoesrcool} : REPORT: NBC Says Trump Supporter Who Wore Clinton ‘Rape’ Shirt Should Have Expected to Get Beaten', '>>{Basketball835} : How to fix phone losing battery while off overnight?', '>>{Dizzy_Slip} : 9 Percent of the Wisconsin Electorate Just Got Their Right to Vote Back', ">>{quadropheniac} : Not mentioned in the article but nevertheless relevant: the lawyer in charge of the case against the Voter ID law was Marc Elias, who is Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign general counsel. He's also suing several other states who have implemented similar Voter ID laws.", '>>{Lysergh} : The easiest way would probably be buying 50GB iCloud storage for $1, transfer photos to your PC with iCloud client, then cancel the additional cloud storage subscription.', '>>{I_Love_McRibs} : If you plug your iPhone into a computer, you can pull the photos off onto your computer.', '>>{Thames_CDN} : Turn on "iCloud photo gallery" on her phone and if you have a pc I recommend downloading "phone companion" from the microsoft store. Every time she plugs in her phone to sync with her computer, all her photos will be moved onto your home computer but she\'ll still have access to her whole photo gallery because it\'s on her iCloud photo gallery.', '>>{Von_Hohenheim} : plug the phone into the computer right click the phone and press import', '>>{DragonPup} : I remember he tried to talk to S4P about voting rights and the cases he was bringing to court. It did not go pleasantly for Marc. :\\', ">>{PM_ME_UR_IMPLANTS} : Say I'm at a bar in Boston, and I'm wearing a Yankees cap. Is security responsible for removing me, or for removing the Masshole that took an unprovoked swing at me? Congratulations NBC Security employees, you just beat the shit out of the wrong guy.", '>>{AgoraiosBum} : If he was really for the cause he would be not out there making a difference, he would be talking about voting for a third party or Trump! /s', ">>{kaett} : >However, there were widespread problems when North Carolina’s voter ID law first took effect in the March 15 primary, with voters turned away from the polls without being offered an affidavit or **forced to take “spelling” tests to vote.** wait... what? they expect anyone in today's text-speak society to know how to spell properly? dafuq??", '>>{mrchokabich} : A little more info on what kind of phone you own would be good...', '>>{quadropheniac} : Actually, he has a case against Arizona as well. There wasn\'t any actual voter suppression in New York or California, so suing them doesn\'t really make sense. Missed primary registration deadlines and people who don\'t understand what "voter roll purging" is not the same as unconstitutional restrictions on voting in non-primaries.', '>>{Snuhmeh} : Maybe try putting the phone in "low power mode"', ">>{Chairboy} : Go to Settings:Battery and see what's reported there, might answer your question.", ">>{Marino4K} : People should pay attention to OP, his phone is OFF, so looking at battery stats likely isn't gonna help, same with low power mode.", '>>{cool_hand_luke} : Scott Walker was last seen telling the police force to pull over any black person they can reasonably charge with a felony to make up the difference, and bring balance back to the state.', ">>{Chairboy} : Please pay attention to the reality of user reports: when talking about a phone being OFF, they usually mean that the screen is off and it's in standby. Unless the user specifically says that they're powering the phone off (via the shutdown slider, for instance) then it's almost certain just in standby.", '>>{DragonPup} : > As of last month, the state’s DMV had rejected nearly a fifth of all applicants for a voter ID, 85 percent of whom were African American, Latino, or Native American. Or as the Republicans call it, working as intended.', ">>{AncillaryIssues} : David Duke Parrots Donald Trump's Anti-Semitic Tweet: The Former KKK Leader Just Loved Trump's Latest Jab at Hillary Clinton", '>>{bongggblue} : Was at the second to last game of the 2007 season, when the Mets had the monumental 7-in-17 game collapse. We were playing the Marlins. A group of Phillies fans had shirts made up for the game and drove up to troll. They were walking around the concourse at Shea where you could still smoke, and basically every group they passed was ready to pounce on these kids. They got to the top of the ramp where there were 2 cops working security, and the cops were like "okay..time to go" and started directing them back down the ramp towards the exit. They started talking shit back to the cops like "we didn\'t do anything" but the cops were like "we\'re only doing this for your own safety"... Don\'t start none, there won\'t be none...', ">>{PM_ME_UR_IMPLANTS} : And in your situation, did security beat the shit out of the drunken assholes? That's the fundamental difference. Your situation, security tried to avoid a potential ass-kicking. In this situation, it was security that (allegedly) handed out the beating - not other fans of the Today show.", ">>{NorthBlizzard} : It's sad that /r/EnoughTrumpSpam has to ban people from their Safe Space.", ">>{AncillaryIssues} : Let's see how long it takes Trump's minions to work their magic.", '>>{AncillaryIssues} : >Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump received even more high-profile support from noted anti-Semite and white supremacist leader David Duke on Tuesday. >Duke, a former Ku Klux Klan leader and Louisiana state representative who supports Trump, enthusiastically praised the business mogul\'s controversial tweet on Saturday about presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, calling it "Absolutely True!"', '>>{Yenwodyah_} : Wow, locking the vote behind a test is literally a Jim Crow tactic', '>>{shhhhquiet} : [For the curious, a considerably less sensationalized version of the issue.](http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/trump-supporter-sues-nbc-53m-today-show-tossed-article-1.2855507)', '>>{topamine2} : So a person who dislikes Hillary and likes Trump is now controversial because he likes an anti-Hillary propaganda tweeted by Trump?', ">>{Chairboy} : How do you turn it off? Are you doing a complete shutdown (holding the sleep button several seconds then sliding the 'Slide to power off' button? Or just pressing the button once so the screen turns off?", ">>{WetSandwichTrump} : Trump Café keeps a flock of nubile Ukrainian preteens in the basement for Donnie and Co. to humiliate, torture, and penetrate at their leisure. Why won't anyone report this?", ">>{Chairboy} : Welp, getting any information from you feels like pulling teeth so I'm out. If you want help, provide more details in the beginning. If it has to turn into a game of 20 questions, you're doing everything wrong. Good luck with life.", ">>{Marino4K} : If someone says OFF, it's not ridiculous to assume that the phone itself is OFF, in fact, I think you're incorrect to think it means screen off, most people would mention screen itself but phone on", '>>{Dr10s} : Should have added no computer, just an iPad at home.', ">>{flyboyy} : They actually love Duke. If anything, they'll start posting pictures of Byrd kissing Hillary, knowing full well he died as a non-racist.", '>>{Averagedays} : WRONG. WRONG. WRONG. SAD He went to incite this type of behavior. There is a reason Alex jones tells his stupid fans to do it and not engage in the actions himself because he knows the repercussions.', ">>{LTRMcrew} : Try Google Photos then; it's worked really well for me.", ">>{bongggblue} : When the kids started poppin off one cop started poking back with a night stick...I don't know if it got to the point of beating, but they had a while to go before getting to the exit... Good bouncers don't usually get into fistfights...Had a friend who was a pretty well known bouncer in the NYC nightlife scene show me one of his tricks to get tough guys out that involve the earlobe and a little bit of pressure. These security guards are in the wrong, but leaving the house wearing a Shepard Fairy knockoff Bill Clinton Rape shirt should warrant an asskicking from a few different demographics.", ">>{DebussySIMiami} : People like this are looking for trouble. Wouldn't get one dime out of me if I were on the jury.", ">>{Snuhmeh} : It wouldn't lose power if it was actually off. Are you pushing the wake button long enough to actually turn it off? My suggestion still stands. If the phone is possibly reporting the battery level incorrectly, then you may need a new battery.", '>>{gaeuvyen} : >Gallagher, a social worker who lives in Oak Ridge, N.J., was wearing the shirt after Alex Jones, an avid Trump fan who runs a conspiracy website called Infowar.com, promised to pay $1,000 to anyone who could be seen in the shirt on national television for at least five seconds. definitely doing it for the 1,000 usd.', ">>{IDFSHILL} : I'm actually shocked that test is still even available. That was literally how they kept poor/black people from voting for years.", '>>{MatthewTenThirtyFour} : The victims wore Make America Great Again" hats. They should have expected to get jumped." - /r/politics', '>>{DaddyMonkey} : Google Photos is absolutely amazing in every way. Use it for this purpose.', '>>{PM_ME_UR_IMPLANTS} : Yes, he went to incite an ass kicking - but instead of getting to point the finger at salty Hillary supporters, now they get to point the finger at "the liberal media\'s jack booted thugs." Let me be clear - he absolutely should have been removed by security. He absolutely should not have had his ass kicked by security.', ">>{PM_ME_UR_IMPLANTS} : I'm not saying he wasn't asking for an ass kicking - I'm saying it was security's job to prevent that (by removing him, yes), not to be the threat they're there to prevent.", '>>{stoic_blunder} : Who is David Duke? Never heard of him. http://www.factcheck.org/2016/03/trumps-david-duke-amnesia/', '>>{Averagedays} : Yes. Yes. Yes. AND BINGO WAS HIS NAME-O', ">>{BugSauce} : If you don't mind paying the $1 for more iCloid space, set it to backup/upload/sync photos when the phone is plugged in and not in use. In the morning or later in the day when she has time she can verify the transfer to the cloud and remove them from device storage. Minimal effort, maximum results. :o", '>>{BravoTangoFoxObama} : I think you mean "former racist." A non-racist would be someone who never had those beliefs.', '>>{flyboyy} : I apologize. He was a good man, regardless.', '>>{whyd_I_laugh_at_that} : I don\'t see any reference in either source that NBC says he "should have been beaten." And NBC security says they didn\'t touch him. And his only photo shows a small bruise on one arm, I don\'t know that I\'d call that a "beating" even if it was by the guards. So, the "don\'t believe anything negative about Trump unless it comes from Breitbart or you directly talk to the head of the FBI and he shows you immeasurable evidence" crowd says "do believe anything negative about everyone else without any evidence whatsoever."', '>>{popname} : > Don\'t start none, there won\'t be none... "We will beat you for disagreeing with us and it\'s your fault!" And the Democrats still wonder why they are losing elections across the country and all levels.', '>>{BugSauce} : Edit: whenever you do have access to a computer, friend or parents house or what not, you can easily transfer to an external drive there.', '>>{TheCabbager} : >"We will beat you for disagreeing with us and it\'s your fault!" You mean like gays? Or blacks? Or transgender? Or non-Christian. Sorry, you were thinking of conservatives all along.', '>>{TheCabbager} : >"the liberal media\'s jack booted thugs." I thought liberals were pussies?', ">>{MonkeysOnMyBottom} : Well if he didn't want to get ~~raped~~ beaten, he wouldn't have worn that shirt", ">>{AncillaryIssues} : It's like the Ron Paul zealots all over again.", ">>{kaett} : it was half joke, but i was trying to allude to the fact that the english language has changed significantly since we've been reduced to text messages and tweets.", '>>{AncillaryIssues} : 20 minutes: 26 votes, 1 point. Nope! No brigading here!', ">>{TrumpIsToast} : It's been just horrible. They come at you like a huge pack of dogs.", '>>{Savanna_INFINITY} : You can use airdrop (If you have an iPad, Macbook or Imac.', ">>{VTFD} : ... did you see Duke's tweet? It was some Elders of Zion shit. Classic antisemitic canard.", '>>{infinitum17} : Your comment is idiotic, but if there really are spelling tests, that is illegal. But I can totally see vote-suppressing conservatives saying like "well if they can\'t read they shouldn\'t be able to sign the affidavit" or some other dumbshit EDIT: I get why being able to read is important to signing something. But being able to read shouldn\'t be a prerequisite to being able to vote.', ">>{flyboyy} : Duke, though left the klan, is still a member at heart. Nothing has changed in his dialogue or his ways since, so it's like he never left the klan at all. Byrd is a former racist; apologized and disavowed not only the klan but his racist ways, too. He has completely transformed as a person. Byrd died as a good man while Duke is the same old racist he's always been.", ">>{McCaber} : Knowing the police we have here, he didn't even need to say it.", ">>{cmit} : No, it is the pattern of support Trump gets from neo-nazi's, the KKK, white supremacists, anti-Semites, etc. This was not a one off situation.", ">>{hard4you} : How else can the ruling elite retain their seats. Gerrymandering and more are used by all sides in politics these days. A shitty monopolistic media doesn't help when you only get talking points for fringe groups. Money talks in our society and I am enjoying this burning roller coaster.", ">>{comcast_ebola_tyson} : If you can't read, your signature on a written contract is pretty meaningless.", '>>{BadEThrowaway} : I have a masters but I still probably couldn\'t spell "affidavit" if you just asked me while I was groggily trying to get through the DMV.', ">>{infinitum17} : There are lots of American adults who can't read. That doesn't mean they're stupid. If someone reads it to you, or explains to you what it says, you should be able to sign something.", ">>{comcast_ebola_tyson} : You'd have no guarantee they're reading it accurately or correctly. No judge would accept your signature for anything. It's as meaningless as a blind person's signature on a non-braille contract. I'd equate it to someone severely mentally disabled signing a contract. Even if their caretaker verbally explains it to them, their signature is meaningless.", ">>{applebottomfeeder} : Wisconsin is so fucked up. How could they possibly elect such anti American corporate stooges as Walker and Ryan? They've never met a corporate dick they wouldn't suck. Everything they do is to make the rich richer and sell out their constituents.", ">>{Sliiiiime} : Are literacy tests legal now due to the conservative justices' gutting of the Voting Rights act?", '>>{Paracortex} : Now, if only the 12% of the Florida electorate who are permanently disenfranchised from voting because of past criminal records could get their right to vote back, like in almost every other state...', '>>{Frickinwicked} : Actually, legally, you are 100 percent wrong.', '>>{QueenNancyPelosi} : Oh, another pity story pushed by leftist hacks to paint Democrats the Knight in Shining Armor. "____, (insert minority status), cannot vote because of Republicans." Nobody outside the hardcore Left gives a rat\'s ass about identity politics. Find effective ways to enthuse your base that don\'t entail exploiting minorities, Democrats. And stay away from forming another three letter hate group.', '>>{QueenNancyPelosi} : When Democrats have to go lurking in felony databases for voters, that is the sign of a desperate, dying, out-of-touch party.', '>>{irishbadger} : I am so embarrassed for my state. Fuck Scott Walker. Voted against him in the first place and was absolutely shocked he survived the recall vote. Showed me how out of touch I am with the rest of my state spending most of my life in Madison.', '>>{Byzantine279} : Yeah. They are too rabid over there, exiled some of their own natural allies. He might work for Clinton, but this is something that they agree on completely.', ">>{Byzantine279} : New York did fuck up by running that purge right before the election rather than giving them enough time to correct mistakes, but it wasn't a mass attempt to disenfrancise, just bureaucracy at work (namely they were required to do the purge before the election, but were too busy to do it until the last moment).", '>>{Byzantine279} : Well, I mean it *is* illegal.', '>>{Byzantine279} : Nope. They gutted the enforcement mechanism, but the actual rules all still apply.', ">>{Byzantine279} : While you could argue that in court, it isn't likely to work.", ">>{giggleshmack} : u/Frickinwicked is right. Contract law states that the person accepting a contract must understand that there are terms, but not necessarily what the terms specifically are. In every first year contracts class, there's a case about a man signing a contract written in Italian. Since he didn't understand Italian, he claimed he wasn't bound by the contract. The court didn't buy it. He was still bound because he knew that there were terms. If the blind or mentally disabled person understands *that* they are agreeing to *something* then its valid.", ">>{Byzantine279} : Democrats don't have to. They just fight for voters rights everywhere.", ">>{quadropheniac} : Oh yeah, it was standard NYBOE dumbfuckery, no doubt, but anyone who was properly registered, even if they were purged, could still vote. They just had to have their registration checked with the State. That's literally the whole point of affidavit ballots. It was a matter of making sure people actually knew all of this. To quote an old film, what we had here was failure to communicate. For some reason it got spread around that affidavit ballots weren't going to get counted at all*, which was nonsense. It's like the long-standing urban legend that absentee ballots or mail-ins aren't counted if the margin is high enough in some states. It's pure urban legend. *If my memory serves, a majority of them weren't counted, but that's due in good part to a few organizations spreading around that people who didn't register in time could just vote with affidavit ballots instead. There is a system to dispute any affidavit ballots that weren't counted erroneously, and naturally there's been no one following up on that.", '>>{escalation} : They gotta check them on a regular basis anyways, to see if their candidate is in there yet', '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : Why are you assuming that the criminals would vote Democrat? Do you have any stats to show that?', '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : The same way r/the_donald bans people from their safe space?', '>>{IStillLikeChieftain} : > But I can totally see vote-suppressing conservatives saying like "well if they can\'t read they shouldn\'t be able to sign the affidavit" or some other dumbshit ... I uh... I don\'t think that\'s dumb.', '>>{fffffssssaa} : You can combine race stats for criminals + voters by race. I think anyone should be able to vote regardless though.', ">>{Good-Writer} : It's a pro Trump sub, go to AskTrumpSupporters if you want to speak. They who get banned are normally disrespectful or hateful. The Hillary sub is much easier to get banned from.", '>>{infinitum17} : well that goes along well with a "democratic" system in which your vote is meaningless too', '>>{canadlaw} : You have absolutely no idea what the fuck you are talking about. You are what is worst about Reddit.', ">>{Paracortex} : That's what you take from my comment? To politicize it? Never crossed your mind that people should have the right to vote if they have finished serving their sentences? That they should pay taxes without representation in perpetuity? What the fuck is wrong with you?", ">>{prototype7} : Not sure it is about even the ruling elite, it's about a shrinking number of backwards people can keep their county, state, and country from changing or progressing.. But really, Gerrymandering needs to die, don't care which side it benefits..", '>>{prototype7} : And if its anything like WA State, the Republicans favorite tactic is to pit rural populations against the major cities that are firmly Democratic and to reference the area of the state that is Republican, instead of the population difference. But in truth, the better the cities do, the better the state does..', ">>{IslandGreetings} : My wife is dyslexic and can't spell worth a damn, should she not be allowed to vote? A spelling test has no relation to one's ability to decide who they want as President yes?", ">>{Aurailious} : They should make that a requirement to own a gun. If you can't vote because of spelling, what other rights should they not have?", '>>{comcast_ebola_tyson} : Yes, some people are just too **illiterate**.', '>>{theduke9} : The only way the GOP will win is voter suppression.', '>>{theamazingjex} : Not really sure how you can blame "all sides" when only one side does it and the other side always opposes it.', '>>{kanst} : The only part of the VRA that got removed was the provision that some states (with a history of being extra racist) had to clear laws by congress before enacting. Now they can enact their own laws. Most of those states enacted voter ID laws shortly after the SCOTUS case.', '>>{kanst} : I routinely use google to figure out the correct spelling of things.', ">>{RVA2DC} : Why should people convicted of felonies who are no longer incarcerated not have their rights restored? I have never heard any logical argument for this, except that black people are more likely to have felonies and they're also more likely to vote democrat.", '>>{kralben} : Well, Walker got elected in the tea-party wave of 2010, and the local party sucked then (and during the recall they attempted) at getting a competent person to run against him. Walker was a failure by the Wisconsin Democratic Party more than anything. Ryan, on the other hand, it just in a very safe, very right district. Suburbs of Milwaukee, lots of wealthy folks.', ">>{RVA2DC} : >\ufeff The preliminary injunction in a challenge brought by the ACLU protects the voting rights of thousands of Wisconsinites who faced disenfranchisement in November. Another reason I'm a proud supporter of the ACLU. While I don't agree with all of their positions, I do agree with 95% or so of them, and they fight the good fight for people and groups of people who have had it a lot harder than I ever have.", '>>{theamazingjex} : The Illinois democratic party does not support disenfranchise people with voter ID laws.', '>>{GetTheLedPaintOut} : Well in this case we must be against it, right?', ">>{GetTheLedPaintOut} : > If you can't read, your signature on a written contract is pretty meaningless. You sir, are completely ignorant of history AND law. Congrats.", ">>{DragonPup} : https://www.reddit.com/user/Marc_Elias/ Notice both comments have been deleted. Here's the SRD thread: np.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/4bqx86/hillary_clintons_general_counsel_shows_up_in_the/", '>>{Collective82} : > I am enjoying this burning roller coaster. As I call it, the trumpcoaster!', ">>{Collective82} : I right click on the red squiggly lines, or look at apples suggestions when typing. Hell I didn't even get squiggly right!", '>>{Collective82} : How many are like your wife, and how many are just that ill educated? I ask this because we are getting ourselves into this mess because the ill educated are voting for people that are not good for them long term, and only good for short term. Things like obamaphones, and "free healthcare" got a lot of votes, but it wasn\'t a good plan.', '>>{LWZRGHT} : This is a big story. Wisconsin is really important for Hillary, and this makes it far more likely that she will win there.', ">>{Collective82} : well you kind of have to be able to read, to understand a ballot. I don't agree with any bar to vote other than an ID. but thats just me.", ">>{RushofBlood52} : That certain citizens don't have their most basic rights because they don't reach some arbitrary intelligence standard? How is that not dumb?", '>>{kaett} : the cartoon makes a good point, however those kids are living their text-based lives sacrificing grammar and spelling, and that\'s become a pet peeve of mine. is it really that hard to spell out simple three-letter words like "too" or "you" instead of using phonetic replacements of "2" and "U"? how many facebook posts do any of us see on a daily basis that can\'t use the proper form of "you\'re/your" or "their/they\'re/there", or even have punctuation?', '>>{Schlick80} : The ONLY reason that the democrats oppose voter ID laws is because it benefits them, do you really believe that if the majority of these voters voted republican the democrats would still push this issue?', '>>{theamazingjex} : Well I dont think it would be an issue then because I think Democrats would want to fix it. Democrats have a history of doing things that hurt them politically. Civil Rights Act. 1994 Budget. The Affordable Care Act.', ">>{Schlick80} : How did those hurt them politically? They voted on those things because they are beneficial to their voter base. If anything, the bipartisan voting on the Civil Rights Act hurt the republicans far more then the democrats, but it was still passed virtually unanimously by both parties in the House and the Senate. The affordable care act directly panders to the low-income, which vote overwhelmingly democrat. The 1994 budget I don't really know anything about and don't have the time to research right now.", ">>{theamazingjex} : Seriously? The Civil Rights Act lost them the south for a generation (well actually it's starting to look like two generations now). The 1994 budget lead to the 1996 midterms with it's unpopular tax hikes and spending cuts. I'll grant you the ACA is a little more obscure. You have to go down into the weeds and see what political scientists like Nate Silver did to show that voting for the ACA act made democrats in competative seats do worse in the 2010 midterms.", ">>{jjmc123a} : If that's true, then it is illegal [The civil rights act made literacy tests illegal](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literacy_test#Voting)", ">>{kaett} : somehow i don't think a little matter like legality makes a difference to the governor of north carolina."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{Lysergh} : The easiest way would probably be buying 50GB iCloud storage for $1, transfer photos to your PC with iCloud client, then cancel the additional cloud storage subscription.', '>>{I_Love_McRibs} : If you plug your iPhone into a computer, you can pull the photos off onto your computer.', '>>{Thames_CDN} : Turn on "iCloud photo gallery" on her phone and if you have a pc I recommend downloading "phone companion" from the microsoft store. Every time she plugs in her phone to sync with her computer, all her photos will be moved onto your home computer but she\'ll still have access to her whole photo gallery because it\'s on her iCloud photo gallery.', '>>{Von_Hohenheim} : plug the phone into the computer right click the phone and press import', '>>{Dr10s} : Should have added no computer, just an iPad at home.', ">>{LTRMcrew} : Try Google Photos then; it's worked really well for me.", '>>{DaddyMonkey} : Google Photos is absolutely amazing in every way. Use it for this purpose.', ">>{BugSauce} : If you don't mind paying the $1 for more iCloid space, set it to backup/upload/sync photos when the phone is plugged in and not in use. In the morning or later in the day when she has time she can verify the transfer to the cloud and remove them from device storage. Minimal effort, maximum results. :o", '>>{BugSauce} : Edit: whenever you do have access to a computer, friend or parents house or what not, you can easily transfer to an external drive there.', '>>{Savanna_INFINITY} : You can use airdrop (If you have an iPad, Macbook or Imac.'], [">>{AncillaryIssues} : David Duke Parrots Donald Trump's Anti-Semitic Tweet: The Former KKK Leader Just Loved Trump's Latest Jab at Hillary Clinton", ">>{AncillaryIssues} : Let's see how long it takes Trump's minions to work their magic.", '>>{AncillaryIssues} : >Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump received even more high-profile support from noted anti-Semite and white supremacist leader David Duke on Tuesday. >Duke, a former Ku Klux Klan leader and Louisiana state representative who supports Trump, enthusiastically praised the business mogul\'s controversial tweet on Saturday about presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, calling it "Absolutely True!"', '>>{topamine2} : So a person who dislikes Hillary and likes Trump is now controversial because he likes an anti-Hillary propaganda tweeted by Trump?', ">>{flyboyy} : They actually love Duke. If anything, they'll start posting pictures of Byrd kissing Hillary, knowing full well he died as a non-racist.", '>>{stoic_blunder} : Who is David Duke? Never heard of him. http://www.factcheck.org/2016/03/trumps-david-duke-amnesia/', '>>{BravoTangoFoxObama} : I think you mean "former racist." A non-racist would be someone who never had those beliefs.', '>>{flyboyy} : I apologize. He was a good man, regardless.', ">>{AncillaryIssues} : It's like the Ron Paul zealots all over again.", '>>{AncillaryIssues} : 20 minutes: 26 votes, 1 point. Nope! No brigading here!', ">>{TrumpIsToast} : It's been just horrible. They come at you like a huge pack of dogs.", ">>{VTFD} : ... did you see Duke's tweet? It was some Elders of Zion shit. Classic antisemitic canard.", ">>{flyboyy} : Duke, though left the klan, is still a member at heart. Nothing has changed in his dialogue or his ways since, so it's like he never left the klan at all. Byrd is a former racist; apologized and disavowed not only the klan but his racist ways, too. He has completely transformed as a person. Byrd died as a good man while Duke is the same old racist he's always been.", ">>{cmit} : No, it is the pattern of support Trump gets from neo-nazi's, the KKK, white supremacists, anti-Semites, etc. This was not a one off situation."], ['>>{Basketball835} : How to fix phone losing battery while off overnight?', '>>{mrchokabich} : A little more info on what kind of phone you own would be good...', '>>{Snuhmeh} : Maybe try putting the phone in "low power mode"', ">>{Chairboy} : Go to Settings:Battery and see what's reported there, might answer your question.", ">>{Marino4K} : People should pay attention to OP, his phone is OFF, so looking at battery stats likely isn't gonna help, same with low power mode.", ">>{Chairboy} : Please pay attention to the reality of user reports: when talking about a phone being OFF, they usually mean that the screen is off and it's in standby. Unless the user specifically says that they're powering the phone off (via the shutdown slider, for instance) then it's almost certain just in standby.", ">>{Chairboy} : How do you turn it off? Are you doing a complete shutdown (holding the sleep button several seconds then sliding the 'Slide to power off' button? Or just pressing the button once so the screen turns off?", ">>{Chairboy} : Welp, getting any information from you feels like pulling teeth so I'm out. If you want help, provide more details in the beginning. If it has to turn into a game of 20 questions, you're doing everything wrong. Good luck with life.", ">>{Marino4K} : If someone says OFF, it's not ridiculous to assume that the phone itself is OFF, in fact, I think you're incorrect to think it means screen off, most people would mention screen itself but phone on", ">>{Snuhmeh} : It wouldn't lose power if it was actually off. Are you pushing the wake button long enough to actually turn it off? My suggestion still stands. If the phone is possibly reporting the battery level incorrectly, then you may need a new battery."], ['>>{Dizzy_Slip} : 9 Percent of the Wisconsin Electorate Just Got Their Right to Vote Back', ">>{quadropheniac} : Not mentioned in the article but nevertheless relevant: the lawyer in charge of the case against the Voter ID law was Marc Elias, who is Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign general counsel. He's also suing several other states who have implemented similar Voter ID laws.", '>>{DragonPup} : I remember he tried to talk to S4P about voting rights and the cases he was bringing to court. It did not go pleasantly for Marc. :\\', '>>{AgoraiosBum} : If he was really for the cause he would be not out there making a difference, he would be talking about voting for a third party or Trump! /s', ">>{kaett} : >However, there were widespread problems when North Carolina’s voter ID law first took effect in the March 15 primary, with voters turned away from the polls without being offered an affidavit or **forced to take “spelling” tests to vote.** wait... what? they expect anyone in today's text-speak society to know how to spell properly? dafuq??", '>>{quadropheniac} : Actually, he has a case against Arizona as well. There wasn\'t any actual voter suppression in New York or California, so suing them doesn\'t really make sense. Missed primary registration deadlines and people who don\'t understand what "voter roll purging" is not the same as unconstitutional restrictions on voting in non-primaries.', '>>{cool_hand_luke} : Scott Walker was last seen telling the police force to pull over any black person they can reasonably charge with a felony to make up the difference, and bring balance back to the state.', '>>{DragonPup} : > As of last month, the state’s DMV had rejected nearly a fifth of all applicants for a voter ID, 85 percent of whom were African American, Latino, or Native American. Or as the Republicans call it, working as intended.', ">>{NorthBlizzard} : It's sad that /r/EnoughTrumpSpam has to ban people from their Safe Space.", '>>{Yenwodyah_} : Wow, locking the vote behind a test is literally a Jim Crow tactic', ">>{IDFSHILL} : I'm actually shocked that test is still even available. That was literally how they kept poor/black people from voting for years.", ">>{kaett} : it was half joke, but i was trying to allude to the fact that the english language has changed significantly since we've been reduced to text messages and tweets.", '>>{infinitum17} : Your comment is idiotic, but if there really are spelling tests, that is illegal. But I can totally see vote-suppressing conservatives saying like "well if they can\'t read they shouldn\'t be able to sign the affidavit" or some other dumbshit EDIT: I get why being able to read is important to signing something. But being able to read shouldn\'t be a prerequisite to being able to vote.', ">>{McCaber} : Knowing the police we have here, he didn't even need to say it.", ">>{hard4you} : How else can the ruling elite retain their seats. Gerrymandering and more are used by all sides in politics these days. A shitty monopolistic media doesn't help when you only get talking points for fringe groups. Money talks in our society and I am enjoying this burning roller coaster.", ">>{comcast_ebola_tyson} : If you can't read, your signature on a written contract is pretty meaningless.", '>>{BadEThrowaway} : I have a masters but I still probably couldn\'t spell "affidavit" if you just asked me while I was groggily trying to get through the DMV.', ">>{infinitum17} : There are lots of American adults who can't read. That doesn't mean they're stupid. If someone reads it to you, or explains to you what it says, you should be able to sign something.", ">>{comcast_ebola_tyson} : You'd have no guarantee they're reading it accurately or correctly. No judge would accept your signature for anything. It's as meaningless as a blind person's signature on a non-braille contract. I'd equate it to someone severely mentally disabled signing a contract. Even if their caretaker verbally explains it to them, their signature is meaningless.", ">>{applebottomfeeder} : Wisconsin is so fucked up. How could they possibly elect such anti American corporate stooges as Walker and Ryan? They've never met a corporate dick they wouldn't suck. Everything they do is to make the rich richer and sell out their constituents.", ">>{Sliiiiime} : Are literacy tests legal now due to the conservative justices' gutting of the Voting Rights act?", '>>{Paracortex} : Now, if only the 12% of the Florida electorate who are permanently disenfranchised from voting because of past criminal records could get their right to vote back, like in almost every other state...', '>>{Frickinwicked} : Actually, legally, you are 100 percent wrong.', '>>{QueenNancyPelosi} : Oh, another pity story pushed by leftist hacks to paint Democrats the Knight in Shining Armor. "____, (insert minority status), cannot vote because of Republicans." Nobody outside the hardcore Left gives a rat\'s ass about identity politics. Find effective ways to enthuse your base that don\'t entail exploiting minorities, Democrats. And stay away from forming another three letter hate group.', '>>{QueenNancyPelosi} : When Democrats have to go lurking in felony databases for voters, that is the sign of a desperate, dying, out-of-touch party.', '>>{irishbadger} : I am so embarrassed for my state. Fuck Scott Walker. Voted against him in the first place and was absolutely shocked he survived the recall vote. Showed me how out of touch I am with the rest of my state spending most of my life in Madison.', '>>{Byzantine279} : Yeah. They are too rabid over there, exiled some of their own natural allies. He might work for Clinton, but this is something that they agree on completely.', ">>{Byzantine279} : New York did fuck up by running that purge right before the election rather than giving them enough time to correct mistakes, but it wasn't a mass attempt to disenfrancise, just bureaucracy at work (namely they were required to do the purge before the election, but were too busy to do it until the last moment).", '>>{Byzantine279} : Well, I mean it *is* illegal.', '>>{Byzantine279} : Nope. They gutted the enforcement mechanism, but the actual rules all still apply.', ">>{Byzantine279} : While you could argue that in court, it isn't likely to work.", ">>{giggleshmack} : u/Frickinwicked is right. Contract law states that the person accepting a contract must understand that there are terms, but not necessarily what the terms specifically are. In every first year contracts class, there's a case about a man signing a contract written in Italian. Since he didn't understand Italian, he claimed he wasn't bound by the contract. The court didn't buy it. He was still bound because he knew that there were terms. If the blind or mentally disabled person understands *that* they are agreeing to *something* then its valid.", ">>{Byzantine279} : Democrats don't have to. They just fight for voters rights everywhere.", ">>{quadropheniac} : Oh yeah, it was standard NYBOE dumbfuckery, no doubt, but anyone who was properly registered, even if they were purged, could still vote. They just had to have their registration checked with the State. That's literally the whole point of affidavit ballots. It was a matter of making sure people actually knew all of this. To quote an old film, what we had here was failure to communicate. For some reason it got spread around that affidavit ballots weren't going to get counted at all*, which was nonsense. It's like the long-standing urban legend that absentee ballots or mail-ins aren't counted if the margin is high enough in some states. It's pure urban legend. *If my memory serves, a majority of them weren't counted, but that's due in good part to a few organizations spreading around that people who didn't register in time could just vote with affidavit ballots instead. There is a system to dispute any affidavit ballots that weren't counted erroneously, and naturally there's been no one following up on that.", '>>{escalation} : They gotta check them on a regular basis anyways, to see if their candidate is in there yet', '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : Why are you assuming that the criminals would vote Democrat? Do you have any stats to show that?', '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : The same way r/the_donald bans people from their safe space?', '>>{IStillLikeChieftain} : > But I can totally see vote-suppressing conservatives saying like "well if they can\'t read they shouldn\'t be able to sign the affidavit" or some other dumbshit ... I uh... I don\'t think that\'s dumb.', '>>{fffffssssaa} : You can combine race stats for criminals + voters by race. I think anyone should be able to vote regardless though.', ">>{Good-Writer} : It's a pro Trump sub, go to AskTrumpSupporters if you want to speak. They who get banned are normally disrespectful or hateful. The Hillary sub is much easier to get banned from.", '>>{infinitum17} : well that goes along well with a "democratic" system in which your vote is meaningless too', '>>{canadlaw} : You have absolutely no idea what the fuck you are talking about. You are what is worst about Reddit.', ">>{Paracortex} : That's what you take from my comment? To politicize it? Never crossed your mind that people should have the right to vote if they have finished serving their sentences? That they should pay taxes without representation in perpetuity? What the fuck is wrong with you?", ">>{prototype7} : Not sure it is about even the ruling elite, it's about a shrinking number of backwards people can keep their county, state, and country from changing or progressing.. But really, Gerrymandering needs to die, don't care which side it benefits..", '>>{prototype7} : And if its anything like WA State, the Republicans favorite tactic is to pit rural populations against the major cities that are firmly Democratic and to reference the area of the state that is Republican, instead of the population difference. But in truth, the better the cities do, the better the state does..', ">>{IslandGreetings} : My wife is dyslexic and can't spell worth a damn, should she not be allowed to vote? A spelling test has no relation to one's ability to decide who they want as President yes?", ">>{Aurailious} : They should make that a requirement to own a gun. If you can't vote because of spelling, what other rights should they not have?", '>>{comcast_ebola_tyson} : Yes, some people are just too **illiterate**.', '>>{theduke9} : The only way the GOP will win is voter suppression.', '>>{theamazingjex} : Not really sure how you can blame "all sides" when only one side does it and the other side always opposes it.', '>>{kanst} : The only part of the VRA that got removed was the provision that some states (with a history of being extra racist) had to clear laws by congress before enacting. Now they can enact their own laws. Most of those states enacted voter ID laws shortly after the SCOTUS case.', '>>{kanst} : I routinely use google to figure out the correct spelling of things.', ">>{RVA2DC} : Why should people convicted of felonies who are no longer incarcerated not have their rights restored? I have never heard any logical argument for this, except that black people are more likely to have felonies and they're also more likely to vote democrat.", '>>{kralben} : Well, Walker got elected in the tea-party wave of 2010, and the local party sucked then (and during the recall they attempted) at getting a competent person to run against him. Walker was a failure by the Wisconsin Democratic Party more than anything. Ryan, on the other hand, it just in a very safe, very right district. Suburbs of Milwaukee, lots of wealthy folks.', ">>{RVA2DC} : >\ufeff The preliminary injunction in a challenge brought by the ACLU protects the voting rights of thousands of Wisconsinites who faced disenfranchisement in November. Another reason I'm a proud supporter of the ACLU. While I don't agree with all of their positions, I do agree with 95% or so of them, and they fight the good fight for people and groups of people who have had it a lot harder than I ever have.", '>>{theamazingjex} : The Illinois democratic party does not support disenfranchise people with voter ID laws.', '>>{GetTheLedPaintOut} : Well in this case we must be against it, right?', ">>{GetTheLedPaintOut} : > If you can't read, your signature on a written contract is pretty meaningless. You sir, are completely ignorant of history AND law. Congrats.", ">>{DragonPup} : https://www.reddit.com/user/Marc_Elias/ Notice both comments have been deleted. Here's the SRD thread: np.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/4bqx86/hillary_clintons_general_counsel_shows_up_in_the/", '>>{Collective82} : > I am enjoying this burning roller coaster. As I call it, the trumpcoaster!', ">>{Collective82} : I right click on the red squiggly lines, or look at apples suggestions when typing. Hell I didn't even get squiggly right!", '>>{Collective82} : How many are like your wife, and how many are just that ill educated? I ask this because we are getting ourselves into this mess because the ill educated are voting for people that are not good for them long term, and only good for short term. Things like obamaphones, and "free healthcare" got a lot of votes, but it wasn\'t a good plan.', '>>{LWZRGHT} : This is a big story. Wisconsin is really important for Hillary, and this makes it far more likely that she will win there.', ">>{Collective82} : well you kind of have to be able to read, to understand a ballot. I don't agree with any bar to vote other than an ID. but thats just me.", ">>{RushofBlood52} : That certain citizens don't have their most basic rights because they don't reach some arbitrary intelligence standard? How is that not dumb?", '>>{kaett} : the cartoon makes a good point, however those kids are living their text-based lives sacrificing grammar and spelling, and that\'s become a pet peeve of mine. is it really that hard to spell out simple three-letter words like "too" or "you" instead of using phonetic replacements of "2" and "U"? how many facebook posts do any of us see on a daily basis that can\'t use the proper form of "you\'re/your" or "their/they\'re/there", or even have punctuation?', '>>{Schlick80} : The ONLY reason that the democrats oppose voter ID laws is because it benefits them, do you really believe that if the majority of these voters voted republican the democrats would still push this issue?', '>>{theamazingjex} : Well I dont think it would be an issue then because I think Democrats would want to fix it. Democrats have a history of doing things that hurt them politically. Civil Rights Act. 1994 Budget. The Affordable Care Act.', ">>{Schlick80} : How did those hurt them politically? They voted on those things because they are beneficial to their voter base. If anything, the bipartisan voting on the Civil Rights Act hurt the republicans far more then the democrats, but it was still passed virtually unanimously by both parties in the House and the Senate. The affordable care act directly panders to the low-income, which vote overwhelmingly democrat. The 1994 budget I don't really know anything about and don't have the time to research right now.", ">>{theamazingjex} : Seriously? The Civil Rights Act lost them the south for a generation (well actually it's starting to look like two generations now). The 1994 budget lead to the 1996 midterms with it's unpopular tax hikes and spending cuts. I'll grant you the ACA is a little more obscure. You have to go down into the weeds and see what political scientists like Nate Silver did to show that voting for the ACA act made democrats in competative seats do worse in the 2010 midterms.", ">>{jjmc123a} : If that's true, then it is illegal [The civil rights act made literacy tests illegal](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literacy_test#Voting)", ">>{kaett} : somehow i don't think a little matter like legality makes a difference to the governor of north carolina."], ['>>{blueshoesrcool} : REPORT: NBC Says Trump Supporter Who Wore Clinton ‘Rape’ Shirt Should Have Expected to Get Beaten', ">>{PM_ME_UR_IMPLANTS} : Say I'm at a bar in Boston, and I'm wearing a Yankees cap. Is security responsible for removing me, or for removing the Masshole that took an unprovoked swing at me? Congratulations NBC Security employees, you just beat the shit out of the wrong guy.", '>>{bongggblue} : Was at the second to last game of the 2007 season, when the Mets had the monumental 7-in-17 game collapse. We were playing the Marlins. A group of Phillies fans had shirts made up for the game and drove up to troll. They were walking around the concourse at Shea where you could still smoke, and basically every group they passed was ready to pounce on these kids. They got to the top of the ramp where there were 2 cops working security, and the cops were like "okay..time to go" and started directing them back down the ramp towards the exit. They started talking shit back to the cops like "we didn\'t do anything" but the cops were like "we\'re only doing this for your own safety"... Don\'t start none, there won\'t be none...', ">>{PM_ME_UR_IMPLANTS} : And in your situation, did security beat the shit out of the drunken assholes? That's the fundamental difference. Your situation, security tried to avoid a potential ass-kicking. In this situation, it was security that (allegedly) handed out the beating - not other fans of the Today show.", '>>{shhhhquiet} : [For the curious, a considerably less sensationalized version of the issue.](http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/trump-supporter-sues-nbc-53m-today-show-tossed-article-1.2855507)', ">>{WetSandwichTrump} : Trump Café keeps a flock of nubile Ukrainian preteens in the basement for Donnie and Co. to humiliate, torture, and penetrate at their leisure. Why won't anyone report this?", '>>{Averagedays} : WRONG. WRONG. WRONG. SAD He went to incite this type of behavior. There is a reason Alex jones tells his stupid fans to do it and not engage in the actions himself because he knows the repercussions.', ">>{bongggblue} : When the kids started poppin off one cop started poking back with a night stick...I don't know if it got to the point of beating, but they had a while to go before getting to the exit... Good bouncers don't usually get into fistfights...Had a friend who was a pretty well known bouncer in the NYC nightlife scene show me one of his tricks to get tough guys out that involve the earlobe and a little bit of pressure. These security guards are in the wrong, but leaving the house wearing a Shepard Fairy knockoff Bill Clinton Rape shirt should warrant an asskicking from a few different demographics.", ">>{DebussySIMiami} : People like this are looking for trouble. Wouldn't get one dime out of me if I were on the jury.", '>>{gaeuvyen} : >Gallagher, a social worker who lives in Oak Ridge, N.J., was wearing the shirt after Alex Jones, an avid Trump fan who runs a conspiracy website called Infowar.com, promised to pay $1,000 to anyone who could be seen in the shirt on national television for at least five seconds. definitely doing it for the 1,000 usd.', '>>{MatthewTenThirtyFour} : The victims wore Make America Great Again" hats. They should have expected to get jumped." - /r/politics', '>>{PM_ME_UR_IMPLANTS} : Yes, he went to incite an ass kicking - but instead of getting to point the finger at salty Hillary supporters, now they get to point the finger at "the liberal media\'s jack booted thugs." Let me be clear - he absolutely should have been removed by security. He absolutely should not have had his ass kicked by security.', ">>{PM_ME_UR_IMPLANTS} : I'm not saying he wasn't asking for an ass kicking - I'm saying it was security's job to prevent that (by removing him, yes), not to be the threat they're there to prevent.", '>>{Averagedays} : Yes. Yes. Yes. AND BINGO WAS HIS NAME-O', '>>{whyd_I_laugh_at_that} : I don\'t see any reference in either source that NBC says he "should have been beaten." And NBC security says they didn\'t touch him. And his only photo shows a small bruise on one arm, I don\'t know that I\'d call that a "beating" even if it was by the guards. So, the "don\'t believe anything negative about Trump unless it comes from Breitbart or you directly talk to the head of the FBI and he shows you immeasurable evidence" crowd says "do believe anything negative about everyone else without any evidence whatsoever."', '>>{popname} : > Don\'t start none, there won\'t be none... "We will beat you for disagreeing with us and it\'s your fault!" And the Democrats still wonder why they are losing elections across the country and all levels.', '>>{TheCabbager} : >"We will beat you for disagreeing with us and it\'s your fault!" You mean like gays? Or blacks? Or transgender? Or non-Christian. Sorry, you were thinking of conservatives all along.', '>>{TheCabbager} : >"the liberal media\'s jack booted thugs." I thought liberals were pussies?', ">>{MonkeysOnMyBottom} : Well if he didn't want to get ~~raped~~ beaten, he wouldn't have worn that shirt"]]

classify and reply

['>>{Whoshabooboo} : Trump won’t save coal jobs — he will put America on the path to environmental ruin', ">>{pizzashill} : I love how we live in a time period where **China** is moving away from coal and the US is moving back towards coal somehow. I guess it was only a matter of time before intellectual rot did us in, we couldn't coast on ww2 forever. Also with Trump cutting research - other countries will just pick this up, this is how superpowers die.", ">>{wangdingus} : I don't love it. We're becoming the gross crew.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : I would tell conservatives to enjoy the fucking coal water they'll be drinking, but that sad truth is those assholes are also polluting MY water.", '>>{EMorteVita} : It is almost like the GOP forgot our rivers once caught fire because they were so polluted.', ">>{IbanezDavy} : > US is moving back towards coal somehow. I suspect the US won't move back to coal. Despite Trump's promises. It's not like coal is magically going to be better than natural gas, oil, and solar just because of Trump.", '>>{PrettyMuchAVegetable} : Well no, see the rich are polluting the water the poor rely on. The rich have bottles to drink and personal filtration in the shower.', ">>{Evil_phd} : It's a funny kind of love. I'm also kind of tempted to just kick back with a beer and watch it all burn down but unfortunately the water source for my beer will soon be running black with coal debris.", ">>{pizzashill} : We don't even have to move back to coal for it to be bad, he's slowing the change to renewables and will more than likely try to prop the coal industry up. Coal needs to die, right now. It's an obsolete energy source.", ">>{skizmo} : Trump has only 1 goal... undo everything Obama did. He really doesn't give a shit about the outcome as long as it is the opposite of Obama.", ">>{skizmo} : We don't. Trump simply undo's what Obama did.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : There's a river (it's quite a famous river actually) in Iraq that literally burned for a few weeks. The other famous river around Baghdad dried up. We really fucked up Iraq and along with it many historical things, such as the tigris and euphrates", ">>{MoreTuple} : I'm tired of people pretending that the coal industry is the only people this affects. His plan will create an increase of jobs in many sectors of the economy such as wagon wheel makers, blacksmiths, bakelite producers and the like. Can we please keep some logical consistency here?", ">>{geraldohibiscus} : I don't think the US will, either. Trump is treating it like signing the EO means it's a done deal. It's one step on a long road, and if they can't even get the healthcare bill through (which seemed like a done deal for how long?), what's the likelihood of forcing through this outdated energy source that even his 'oilman' secretary of state doesn't want?", '>>{EMorteVita} : [The Cuyahoga River Burned for 2 Hours](https://savingtheplaces.com/2016/05/12/the-river-that-caught-fire-1969-and-today/)', '>>{theblockedhat} : The contrarian President , elected by rural pinheads, signed an executive order to nowhere. The real, palpable world of renewable energy has already taken over. Unstoppable. Want to give laid-off coal miners jobs ? Pay them to place utility lines and cables underground and get rid of poles. Make America beautiful again ( MABA ) and bring in tourists to our still beautiful country. Wonder why the French countryside is so inviting ? No utility poles.', '>>{zeidrich} : Two people are in a nasty relationship, they want to separate, but they want to keep custody of their child. The child says "I want candy for dinner!" Parent 1 says "No way bucko, eat some real food. If you eat nothing but candy you\'ll get sick." Parent 2 says "Oh, you can absolutely have nothing but candy for dinner." Child is very excited and supports parent 2. Supper time comes along. Parent 2 promises again that they can have candy for dinner. Parent 1 knows this is a terrible idea, it\'s not healthy, and absolutely will not allow Parent 2 to just feed the child candy for dinner. Parent 2 throws up shrugs and says "I tried, but parent 1 just did everything to keep you from having candy for dinner." Child expresses hatred towards parent 1. Goes crying to parent 2, asking if they can have candy for dinner tomorrow. Parent 2 says "Of course you can, I promise."', '>>{OscarSpecial} : Because Democrats want to protect the environment, gotta stick it to them.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{Whoshabooboo} : Trump won’t save coal jobs — he will put America on the path to environmental ruin', ">>{pizzashill} : I love how we live in a time period where **China** is moving away from coal and the US is moving back towards coal somehow. I guess it was only a matter of time before intellectual rot did us in, we couldn't coast on ww2 forever. Also with Trump cutting research - other countries will just pick this up, this is how superpowers die.", ">>{wangdingus} : I don't love it. We're becoming the gross crew.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : I would tell conservatives to enjoy the fucking coal water they'll be drinking, but that sad truth is those assholes are also polluting MY water.", '>>{EMorteVita} : It is almost like the GOP forgot our rivers once caught fire because they were so polluted.', ">>{IbanezDavy} : > US is moving back towards coal somehow. I suspect the US won't move back to coal. Despite Trump's promises. It's not like coal is magically going to be better than natural gas, oil, and solar just because of Trump.", '>>{PrettyMuchAVegetable} : Well no, see the rich are polluting the water the poor rely on. The rich have bottles to drink and personal filtration in the shower.', ">>{Evil_phd} : It's a funny kind of love. I'm also kind of tempted to just kick back with a beer and watch it all burn down but unfortunately the water source for my beer will soon be running black with coal debris.", ">>{pizzashill} : We don't even have to move back to coal for it to be bad, he's slowing the change to renewables and will more than likely try to prop the coal industry up. Coal needs to die, right now. It's an obsolete energy source.", ">>{skizmo} : Trump has only 1 goal... undo everything Obama did. He really doesn't give a shit about the outcome as long as it is the opposite of Obama.", ">>{skizmo} : We don't. Trump simply undo's what Obama did.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : There's a river (it's quite a famous river actually) in Iraq that literally burned for a few weeks. The other famous river around Baghdad dried up. We really fucked up Iraq and along with it many historical things, such as the tigris and euphrates", ">>{MoreTuple} : I'm tired of people pretending that the coal industry is the only people this affects. His plan will create an increase of jobs in many sectors of the economy such as wagon wheel makers, blacksmiths, bakelite producers and the like. Can we please keep some logical consistency here?", ">>{geraldohibiscus} : I don't think the US will, either. Trump is treating it like signing the EO means it's a done deal. It's one step on a long road, and if they can't even get the healthcare bill through (which seemed like a done deal for how long?), what's the likelihood of forcing through this outdated energy source that even his 'oilman' secretary of state doesn't want?", '>>{EMorteVita} : [The Cuyahoga River Burned for 2 Hours](https://savingtheplaces.com/2016/05/12/the-river-that-caught-fire-1969-and-today/)', '>>{theblockedhat} : The contrarian President , elected by rural pinheads, signed an executive order to nowhere. The real, palpable world of renewable energy has already taken over. Unstoppable. Want to give laid-off coal miners jobs ? Pay them to place utility lines and cables underground and get rid of poles. Make America beautiful again ( MABA ) and bring in tourists to our still beautiful country. Wonder why the French countryside is so inviting ? No utility poles.', '>>{zeidrich} : Two people are in a nasty relationship, they want to separate, but they want to keep custody of their child. The child says "I want candy for dinner!" Parent 1 says "No way bucko, eat some real food. If you eat nothing but candy you\'ll get sick." Parent 2 says "Oh, you can absolutely have nothing but candy for dinner." Child is very excited and supports parent 2. Supper time comes along. Parent 2 promises again that they can have candy for dinner. Parent 1 knows this is a terrible idea, it\'s not healthy, and absolutely will not allow Parent 2 to just feed the child candy for dinner. Parent 2 throws up shrugs and says "I tried, but parent 1 just did everything to keep you from having candy for dinner." Child expresses hatred towards parent 1. Goes crying to parent 2, asking if they can have candy for dinner tomorrow. Parent 2 says "Of course you can, I promise."', '>>{OscarSpecial} : Because Democrats want to protect the environment, gotta stick it to them.']]

classify and reply

['>>{MacNCheezOnUrKneez} : Curt Schilling doesn’t think Trump was wrong to look at a 10-year-old and say he’d date her in 10 years', '>>{goprogijoe} : Failed politician. Failed game developer. Failed excuse for a decent human being. Hey, atleast he was good at baseball but even that was so brief that it was just a fart in the wind.', ">>{Ian_Rubbish} : I've heard about it already. From the mainstream media, idiot.", ">>{Snaaaaaaaaaake} : And Curt Schilling, like Trump, lost millions of dollars through his investments and is a piece of shit, loser, asshole who couldn't even keep a commentary job on ESPN. Yeah, what a nobody.", ">>{PMyourself} : In the context of Trump being nine years old, this isn't so bad.", '>>{bismarck2231} : They should cover the March for Life. Its still news.', ">>{n0ahbody} : He didn't say he wanted to grope her *now*, he meant he intended to grope her *10 years from now*. This is getting blown way out of proportion", '>>{Shinranshonin} : [From a man who went ballistic when someone went after his daughter on social media...](http://deadspin.com/curt-schilling-goes-dadmode-on-twitter-trolls-bashing-h-1688969687)', '>>{hotpinkrazr} : That was the funniest interview ever. Everybody watch it.', '>>{Modsdontknow2} : Curt Schilling most famously known for bleeding on a sock.', ">>{Stuckinaloop} : Dammit! I just killed 50,000,000 1/2's of potential pre-borns.", ">>{Fun_For_Guill} : I'd call you a wanker but you might just enjoy it too much.", ">>{Felinomancy} : Just checked the BBC News website. Was talking about the torture thing, and also the Wall, but no March for Life. So I guess in regards to the BBC, that part is true. I didn't even know there's a March for Life. Who marches ***against*** life?", ">>{Rupperrt} : The whole idea of free media is that they're allowed to cover what they want. And you're free to start a newspaper and cover nothing else than the anti abortion march all year around.", ">>{roj2323} : There is NO such thing as Pro Abortion. No one goes to a clinic excited have an abortion. The Pro Choice movement is about just that, Choice. Women simply want to maintain the ability to make decisions about their own bodies. Additionally you have to keep in mind that in a society like the United States that shuns Sex education and Birth control and even Condom use in some cases, Women are going to become pregnant who for one reason or another do not want to have a child. Now what about abstinence? What about it? Humans at their very core have 3 basic functions; eat, sleep and procreate. Our animal instincts drive these desires and there's not a darn thing we can do about it. Now this isn't to say that teaching abstinence is a bad idea, only that it's not fool proof and Can not be relied upon to do the job as [Texas's Teen pregnancy statistics](http://www.dallasobserver.com/news/heres-how-to-fix-texas-sky-high-teen-pregnancy-rate-7626551) can attest to. Therefore if you want to reduce or even eliminate Abortions you can start by Properly educating children about sex, STD's and the other associated risks of being sexually active. You can follow this up by encouraging the use of condoms and other contraceptives and give women open access to birth control. Doing just these 3 things will massively reduce the number of abortions in this country which everyone, including those who are pro choice, would agree is a good thing.", '>>{Stuckinaloop} : If you are humming a [song](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUspLVStPbk) from a Monty Python movie my job is complete.', '>>{Felinomancy} : Well, erm... .... .... okay fine, Nazis. You got me there.', ">>{SloMoSteveCoughin} : I watch and read the news. Outside of the the occasional mention, I don't recall a massive get out and protest movement for the womens' march. The media, itself, seemed shocked by the turnout.", ">>{voyagerdoge} : All these directives from the Trump White House about what the media should or should not do are very worrying. This kind of government behavior is what you expect in Assad's Syria, Putin's Russia and similar undemocratic states.", ">>{Uhhhhdel} : Any man or woman who looks at a 10 year old and thinks that they will date that kid in 10 years is sick in the head. This isn't about politics. This is about a sick old man who looked at a 10 year old and thought they were attractive enough to date once it was socially acceptable. That is disturbing. Watching partisans try to defend this behavior shows you how far standards can go down when politics are involved.", '>>{Felinomancy} : Then what is he bitching about? How can the media cover an event that had not yet happened?', '>>{KamonKur} : On a milder note, ask any woman if she wants to date a man 36 years older than her. You know, women do get to choose, right?', ">>{StrangeCharmVote} : I think I'm missing something. I mean Trump is an old guy now, sure. But what exactly is wrong with saying you'd date a *20 year old*?", ">>{measiwitch} : What is wrong is that the person in question isn't 20. She's 10.", ">>{heroic_cat} : Checking out 10 year olds and saying you'll date them is not acceptable.", ">>{StrangeCharmVote} : But they *wont be* in ten years right? If he said he'd date an 18 year old *right now* nobody would really care. Heck, Huge Hefner has been (basically) getting away with that for the last thirty years or something, and most people seem to like the guy. Trump may be an asshole, but I think people are blowing this one out of proportion for no good reason.", ">>{harveyf-king_bullock} : You don't see anything wrong with a grown man telling a 10 year old that they'll be dating once it's socially acceptable?", ">>{limitedimagination} : I agree the man's an ass, but I'd hope my dad would've defended me in that situation. Those guys were creepy x Trump.", '>>{number9_number9} : He looked at a 10 year old and said he would be dating her in 10 years. He was sexualizing a 10 year old. Have you ever looked at a 10 year old and thought about her in a sexual way? We know Trump has.', ">>{StrangeCharmVote} : Did he end up dating her, or was it a stupid joke made in really bad taste? Because if it was the later, it seems consistent with his character. Whereas insinuating the former seem like a bit of a baseless accusation. ^(I.e the sexualization thing, I whiffed that comment a bit, it's late.).", ">>{freudian_nipple_slip} : Former Phillies GM Ed Wade: Once every 5 days Curt's a horse. The other 4 days he's a horse's ass. He said he wanted to run against Elizabeth Warren for her Senate seat, she just got her first attack ad", '>>{Gonzanic} : I can thank him for the "bloody sock" game, but I don\'t have to like or respect his politics. His hypocrisy is pretty much on part with the more outspoken right wing types. From his taking tax money for a failed business to his excusing Trump\'s misogyny, but complaining about the [abuse](http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/6848008) his daughter received last year.', '>>{maxpenny42} : He basically said I can\'t wait for her to be legal. He\'s not looking at a 20 year old, finding her individually attractive and speaking about that. He\'s looking at a child and all he seems to think about is how hot she will be later. He\'s reducing a little girl to a future sex object. He\'s saying "I can\'t wait until this fruit is ripe". I honestly cannot fathom how anyone can hear these comments and not see this. I don\'t know how you can see these comments and not have your skin crawl.', ">>{FredFredrickson} : You don't see anything strange about sizing up a 10 year old in order to decide whether you'll want to date them later on? Hugh Hefner doesn't go to fucking elementary schools to find potential future models, man. Seriously, if you think this type of behavior is okay, seek help.", ">>{tsanazi2} : Bring on the downvotes. Schilling is right that there's nothing wrong - beyond bad taste - with saying/joking he'd date a 10-year-old girl in 10 years. - He's acknowledging the girl is too young to be viewed sexually - By contrast, some cultures in the middle east DO view 10-year olds sexually - A parallel comment is saying that a girl will be trouble for men when she grows up: acknowledging the future sexuality of a girl. I've heard this type of comment in numerous situations The bottom line on all of this is that Trump is a nutball, but people should focus on the comments/actions that actually qualify him as a nutball.", ">>{MorrowPlotting} : I'd want your dad to defend you, too. But then when some giant orange turd is caught sexually assaulting other guys' daughters, I'd hope your dad wouldn't embrace and defend him. That's exactly what Curt's doing.", ">>{krocker321} : *Maybe* you'd feel differently if someone said that about *your* daughter?", ">>{MorrowPlotting} : They used to think of him as a god in Massachusetts. I suspect that's about to change dramatically.", ">>{MorrowPlotting} : You're overthinking this. No, he did not date a 10-year-old, and that is not the accusation here. Yes, he made a stupid joke in really bad taste that sexualizes 10-year-old girls. And yes, that is consistent with his character. So, can we just agree he's gross and move on?", '>>{maurosmane} : Oh she has plenty more than that. How do you now 75 million dollars in tax money (on a decent game even sold 1 million copies), and still fold? Then go on to rail against taxes.', ">>{DeanBlandino} : It makes me sad that he's such a failure at life and human decency. I was such a huge fan of his.", ">>{ThaNorth} : We're all very aware how much a piece of shit human Cur Schilling is. People need to stop enabling him to have a voice, there's no reason to ever have to listen to this man talk.", ">>{trustmeep} : The fix is in...I'm pretty sure Curt Schilling went to the Trump School of Game Design...", ">>{stakoverflo} : Wait what? Is he running for office in MA? I used to live there years ago, haven't heard of this.", '>>{measiwitch} : Do you seriously not understand the age and maturity difference between a 10 year old and an 18 or 20 year old?', '>>{Recklesshavoc} : Curt Shilling?! Goddammit go back to your hole!', ">>{happyscrappy} : Society doesn't look well upon those who have sexual fantasies when looking at 10 year olds. And those who wouldn't notice it's also taboo to speak of those thoughts are ranked even lower.", '>>{youAreAllRetards} : In other words, Curt Schilling and Donald Trump should not be allowed near children.', '>>{Rvrsurfer} : It was almost too easy, but I did smile when I posted it. Stay in touche.', '>>{escalation} : Then again, create a reality show called "who wants to date an elderly billionaire" and you would have no shortage of young women auditioning', ">>{KamonKur} : Absolutely no doubt. I was trying to avoid that aspect because greed is a completely different issue. I don't want to suggest that women are greedy because I don't believe they are. But, yes, some are, as are some men.", ">>{DickWork} : Look, Trump is an ass. But it's not like you can't look at a group of kids and see which ones are going to be attractive as adults. He's said plenty of things that warrant full scale repudiation. This isn't one.", ">>{TerantQ} : The marketing was why it failed. I had no idea what it was before it came out. They used the same exact ad tactics as awful free to play MMOs, so I'd assumed it wasn't something worth checking out.", ">>{StrangeCharmVote} : Of course we can. I just find it to be odd that with everything *else* wrong with him that people are making such a big deal out of this thing which happened like 24 years ago, when it's relatively insignificant by comparison (and as also explained i think people are wrong about the comment's implication).", ">>{StrangeCharmVote} : As per my other comment, it is my observation that parents seem to routinely do this, and nobody bats an eyelid. But change the context to Trump saying it and suddenly it's a thing.", ">>{StrangeCharmVote} : He's one of the biggest assholes in america. I'm looking at the comment the way it was almost certainly *intended* instead of pretending he's a part time priest.", '>>{Ramiel001} : See... if a typical person said it, maybe it could be taken as simply an odd thing to say, trump though... not so much.', '>>{StrangeCharmVote} : Actually the way i think he meant it was: "Cute kid." Just like any normal person might comment on. But because of who he is and how much of a douche he needs to be at every waking moment, it came out as the comment everyone is freaking out over. I think people are just reading way too far into it.', '>>{DukesOfBrazzers} : Exactly. I picked up for $20 like a month after it released and I loved it. Sucks that it got buried.', ">>{GiveMeSomeIhedigbo} : If that's the case, he's getting his ass handed to him.", ">>{MacNCheezOnUrKneez} : > but people should focus on the comments/actions that actually qualify him as a nutball. You don't think that calling all Mexican immigrants rapists, being down with sexually assaulting women, sexualizing 10 year old girls, saying that your own daughter is a hot piece of ass and that if she wasn't your daughter you'd date her, that all muslims should be banned, that calling a war veteran a liar, that attacking an deceased American soldier's family, that claiming that your political opponent is a drug addict, that consistently making anti-semitic statement against jews, and racist statements against latinos, black, and arabs, that fat shaming a beauty pageant contestant, that claiming that our own U.S. President is an illegal Kenyan Muslim, that viciously verbally attacking celebrities who call you out on your shit, that making sexist comments about a respected news anchorwoman....all qualify him as a nutball??", '>>{measiwitch} : Absolutely. Which is why I find your inability to grasp the difference between a pre/early pubescent child and a legal adult so shocking.', ">>{StrangeCharmVote} : Do you not then understand the difference between numbers? Ten and Twenty are quite different. Do you agree that there is nothing wrong with dating Twenty year olds? Because nobody, including the douche that's at the centre of this whole issue, has suggested doing anything less.", '>>{measiwitch} : I do think there\'s a problem with sixty and seventy year old men dating twenty year olds, personally. I think the men who do that are pathetic because it shows they can\'t handle women with life experience who won\'t put up with their b.s., and therefore they go after very young adults who don\'t know better. But to make comments about a ten year old is sick. And pretending that a comment about a ten year old because "someday" she\'ll be twenty is sick.', '>>{tsanazi2} : * 1) He did NOT call all Mexican\'s rapists * 2) I agree that "being down with sexually assaulting women" DOES make him a nutball * 3) saying your daughter is a hot pieces of ass that you\'d date if she wasn\'t your daughter is weird but not quite "nutball" material * 4) banning all muslims is a policy stance that\'s impractical but does a good job of connecting him to his voters * 5) I don\'t recall what "calling a war veteran a liar" refers to * 6) attacking a dead soldier\'s family is stupid but not nutball (because it\'s a self-punishing crime) * 7) claiming your opponent is a drug addict is run-of-the-mill politics * 8) the anti-semitic remarks haven\'t been as prevalent (until perhaps this past weekend) and are undermined by his having jewish grandchildren * 9) his racist statements against latinos and blacks DO make him a nutjob (and his attack on the Mexican judge is particularly odious) * 10) fat-shaming beauty-pageant contestants and not apologozing for it after becomeing a politician is nutjob territory * 11) his obstinate birtherism absolutely makes him a nutjob * 12) attacking folks that oppose him is run-of-the-mill politics * 13) and the public sexism is self-punishing silliness']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{Ian_Rubbish} : I've heard about it already. From the mainstream media, idiot.", '>>{bismarck2231} : They should cover the March for Life. Its still news.', ">>{Stuckinaloop} : Dammit! I just killed 50,000,000 1/2's of potential pre-borns.", ">>{Fun_For_Guill} : I'd call you a wanker but you might just enjoy it too much.", ">>{Felinomancy} : Just checked the BBC News website. Was talking about the torture thing, and also the Wall, but no March for Life. So I guess in regards to the BBC, that part is true. I didn't even know there's a March for Life. Who marches ***against*** life?", ">>{Rupperrt} : The whole idea of free media is that they're allowed to cover what they want. And you're free to start a newspaper and cover nothing else than the anti abortion march all year around.", ">>{roj2323} : There is NO such thing as Pro Abortion. No one goes to a clinic excited have an abortion. The Pro Choice movement is about just that, Choice. Women simply want to maintain the ability to make decisions about their own bodies. Additionally you have to keep in mind that in a society like the United States that shuns Sex education and Birth control and even Condom use in some cases, Women are going to become pregnant who for one reason or another do not want to have a child. Now what about abstinence? What about it? Humans at their very core have 3 basic functions; eat, sleep and procreate. Our animal instincts drive these desires and there's not a darn thing we can do about it. Now this isn't to say that teaching abstinence is a bad idea, only that it's not fool proof and Can not be relied upon to do the job as [Texas's Teen pregnancy statistics](http://www.dallasobserver.com/news/heres-how-to-fix-texas-sky-high-teen-pregnancy-rate-7626551) can attest to. Therefore if you want to reduce or even eliminate Abortions you can start by Properly educating children about sex, STD's and the other associated risks of being sexually active. You can follow this up by encouraging the use of condoms and other contraceptives and give women open access to birth control. Doing just these 3 things will massively reduce the number of abortions in this country which everyone, including those who are pro choice, would agree is a good thing.", '>>{Stuckinaloop} : If you are humming a [song](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUspLVStPbk) from a Monty Python movie my job is complete.', '>>{Felinomancy} : Well, erm... .... .... okay fine, Nazis. You got me there.', ">>{SloMoSteveCoughin} : I watch and read the news. Outside of the the occasional mention, I don't recall a massive get out and protest movement for the womens' march. The media, itself, seemed shocked by the turnout.", ">>{voyagerdoge} : All these directives from the Trump White House about what the media should or should not do are very worrying. This kind of government behavior is what you expect in Assad's Syria, Putin's Russia and similar undemocratic states.", '>>{Felinomancy} : Then what is he bitching about? How can the media cover an event that had not yet happened?'], ['>>{MacNCheezOnUrKneez} : Curt Schilling doesn’t think Trump was wrong to look at a 10-year-old and say he’d date her in 10 years', '>>{goprogijoe} : Failed politician. Failed game developer. Failed excuse for a decent human being. Hey, atleast he was good at baseball but even that was so brief that it was just a fart in the wind.', ">>{Snaaaaaaaaaake} : And Curt Schilling, like Trump, lost millions of dollars through his investments and is a piece of shit, loser, asshole who couldn't even keep a commentary job on ESPN. Yeah, what a nobody.", ">>{PMyourself} : In the context of Trump being nine years old, this isn't so bad.", ">>{n0ahbody} : He didn't say he wanted to grope her *now*, he meant he intended to grope her *10 years from now*. This is getting blown way out of proportion", '>>{Shinranshonin} : [From a man who went ballistic when someone went after his daughter on social media...](http://deadspin.com/curt-schilling-goes-dadmode-on-twitter-trolls-bashing-h-1688969687)', '>>{hotpinkrazr} : That was the funniest interview ever. Everybody watch it.', '>>{Modsdontknow2} : Curt Schilling most famously known for bleeding on a sock.', ">>{Uhhhhdel} : Any man or woman who looks at a 10 year old and thinks that they will date that kid in 10 years is sick in the head. This isn't about politics. This is about a sick old man who looked at a 10 year old and thought they were attractive enough to date once it was socially acceptable. That is disturbing. Watching partisans try to defend this behavior shows you how far standards can go down when politics are involved.", '>>{KamonKur} : On a milder note, ask any woman if she wants to date a man 36 years older than her. You know, women do get to choose, right?', ">>{StrangeCharmVote} : I think I'm missing something. I mean Trump is an old guy now, sure. But what exactly is wrong with saying you'd date a *20 year old*?", ">>{measiwitch} : What is wrong is that the person in question isn't 20. She's 10.", ">>{heroic_cat} : Checking out 10 year olds and saying you'll date them is not acceptable.", ">>{StrangeCharmVote} : But they *wont be* in ten years right? If he said he'd date an 18 year old *right now* nobody would really care. Heck, Huge Hefner has been (basically) getting away with that for the last thirty years or something, and most people seem to like the guy. Trump may be an asshole, but I think people are blowing this one out of proportion for no good reason.", ">>{harveyf-king_bullock} : You don't see anything wrong with a grown man telling a 10 year old that they'll be dating once it's socially acceptable?", ">>{limitedimagination} : I agree the man's an ass, but I'd hope my dad would've defended me in that situation. Those guys were creepy x Trump.", '>>{number9_number9} : He looked at a 10 year old and said he would be dating her in 10 years. He was sexualizing a 10 year old. Have you ever looked at a 10 year old and thought about her in a sexual way? We know Trump has.', ">>{StrangeCharmVote} : Did he end up dating her, or was it a stupid joke made in really bad taste? Because if it was the later, it seems consistent with his character. Whereas insinuating the former seem like a bit of a baseless accusation. ^(I.e the sexualization thing, I whiffed that comment a bit, it's late.).", ">>{freudian_nipple_slip} : Former Phillies GM Ed Wade: Once every 5 days Curt's a horse. The other 4 days he's a horse's ass. He said he wanted to run against Elizabeth Warren for her Senate seat, she just got her first attack ad", '>>{Gonzanic} : I can thank him for the "bloody sock" game, but I don\'t have to like or respect his politics. His hypocrisy is pretty much on part with the more outspoken right wing types. From his taking tax money for a failed business to his excusing Trump\'s misogyny, but complaining about the [abuse](http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/6848008) his daughter received last year.', '>>{maxpenny42} : He basically said I can\'t wait for her to be legal. He\'s not looking at a 20 year old, finding her individually attractive and speaking about that. He\'s looking at a child and all he seems to think about is how hot she will be later. He\'s reducing a little girl to a future sex object. He\'s saying "I can\'t wait until this fruit is ripe". I honestly cannot fathom how anyone can hear these comments and not see this. I don\'t know how you can see these comments and not have your skin crawl.', ">>{FredFredrickson} : You don't see anything strange about sizing up a 10 year old in order to decide whether you'll want to date them later on? Hugh Hefner doesn't go to fucking elementary schools to find potential future models, man. Seriously, if you think this type of behavior is okay, seek help.", ">>{tsanazi2} : Bring on the downvotes. Schilling is right that there's nothing wrong - beyond bad taste - with saying/joking he'd date a 10-year-old girl in 10 years. - He's acknowledging the girl is too young to be viewed sexually - By contrast, some cultures in the middle east DO view 10-year olds sexually - A parallel comment is saying that a girl will be trouble for men when she grows up: acknowledging the future sexuality of a girl. I've heard this type of comment in numerous situations The bottom line on all of this is that Trump is a nutball, but people should focus on the comments/actions that actually qualify him as a nutball.", ">>{MorrowPlotting} : I'd want your dad to defend you, too. But then when some giant orange turd is caught sexually assaulting other guys' daughters, I'd hope your dad wouldn't embrace and defend him. That's exactly what Curt's doing.", ">>{krocker321} : *Maybe* you'd feel differently if someone said that about *your* daughter?", ">>{MorrowPlotting} : They used to think of him as a god in Massachusetts. I suspect that's about to change dramatically.", ">>{MorrowPlotting} : You're overthinking this. No, he did not date a 10-year-old, and that is not the accusation here. Yes, he made a stupid joke in really bad taste that sexualizes 10-year-old girls. And yes, that is consistent with his character. So, can we just agree he's gross and move on?", '>>{maurosmane} : Oh she has plenty more than that. How do you now 75 million dollars in tax money (on a decent game even sold 1 million copies), and still fold? Then go on to rail against taxes.', ">>{DeanBlandino} : It makes me sad that he's such a failure at life and human decency. I was such a huge fan of his.", ">>{ThaNorth} : We're all very aware how much a piece of shit human Cur Schilling is. People need to stop enabling him to have a voice, there's no reason to ever have to listen to this man talk.", ">>{trustmeep} : The fix is in...I'm pretty sure Curt Schilling went to the Trump School of Game Design...", ">>{stakoverflo} : Wait what? Is he running for office in MA? I used to live there years ago, haven't heard of this.", '>>{measiwitch} : Do you seriously not understand the age and maturity difference between a 10 year old and an 18 or 20 year old?', '>>{Recklesshavoc} : Curt Shilling?! Goddammit go back to your hole!', ">>{happyscrappy} : Society doesn't look well upon those who have sexual fantasies when looking at 10 year olds. And those who wouldn't notice it's also taboo to speak of those thoughts are ranked even lower.", '>>{youAreAllRetards} : In other words, Curt Schilling and Donald Trump should not be allowed near children.', '>>{Rvrsurfer} : It was almost too easy, but I did smile when I posted it. Stay in touche.', '>>{escalation} : Then again, create a reality show called "who wants to date an elderly billionaire" and you would have no shortage of young women auditioning', ">>{KamonKur} : Absolutely no doubt. I was trying to avoid that aspect because greed is a completely different issue. I don't want to suggest that women are greedy because I don't believe they are. But, yes, some are, as are some men.", ">>{DickWork} : Look, Trump is an ass. But it's not like you can't look at a group of kids and see which ones are going to be attractive as adults. He's said plenty of things that warrant full scale repudiation. This isn't one.", ">>{TerantQ} : The marketing was why it failed. I had no idea what it was before it came out. They used the same exact ad tactics as awful free to play MMOs, so I'd assumed it wasn't something worth checking out.", ">>{StrangeCharmVote} : Of course we can. I just find it to be odd that with everything *else* wrong with him that people are making such a big deal out of this thing which happened like 24 years ago, when it's relatively insignificant by comparison (and as also explained i think people are wrong about the comment's implication).", ">>{StrangeCharmVote} : As per my other comment, it is my observation that parents seem to routinely do this, and nobody bats an eyelid. But change the context to Trump saying it and suddenly it's a thing.", ">>{StrangeCharmVote} : He's one of the biggest assholes in america. I'm looking at the comment the way it was almost certainly *intended* instead of pretending he's a part time priest.", '>>{Ramiel001} : See... if a typical person said it, maybe it could be taken as simply an odd thing to say, trump though... not so much.', '>>{StrangeCharmVote} : Actually the way i think he meant it was: "Cute kid." Just like any normal person might comment on. But because of who he is and how much of a douche he needs to be at every waking moment, it came out as the comment everyone is freaking out over. I think people are just reading way too far into it.', '>>{DukesOfBrazzers} : Exactly. I picked up for $20 like a month after it released and I loved it. Sucks that it got buried.', ">>{GiveMeSomeIhedigbo} : If that's the case, he's getting his ass handed to him.", ">>{MacNCheezOnUrKneez} : > but people should focus on the comments/actions that actually qualify him as a nutball. You don't think that calling all Mexican immigrants rapists, being down with sexually assaulting women, sexualizing 10 year old girls, saying that your own daughter is a hot piece of ass and that if she wasn't your daughter you'd date her, that all muslims should be banned, that calling a war veteran a liar, that attacking an deceased American soldier's family, that claiming that your political opponent is a drug addict, that consistently making anti-semitic statement against jews, and racist statements against latinos, black, and arabs, that fat shaming a beauty pageant contestant, that claiming that our own U.S. President is an illegal Kenyan Muslim, that viciously verbally attacking celebrities who call you out on your shit, that making sexist comments about a respected news anchorwoman....all qualify him as a nutball??", '>>{measiwitch} : Absolutely. Which is why I find your inability to grasp the difference between a pre/early pubescent child and a legal adult so shocking.', ">>{StrangeCharmVote} : Do you not then understand the difference between numbers? Ten and Twenty are quite different. Do you agree that there is nothing wrong with dating Twenty year olds? Because nobody, including the douche that's at the centre of this whole issue, has suggested doing anything less.", '>>{measiwitch} : I do think there\'s a problem with sixty and seventy year old men dating twenty year olds, personally. I think the men who do that are pathetic because it shows they can\'t handle women with life experience who won\'t put up with their b.s., and therefore they go after very young adults who don\'t know better. But to make comments about a ten year old is sick. And pretending that a comment about a ten year old because "someday" she\'ll be twenty is sick.', '>>{tsanazi2} : * 1) He did NOT call all Mexican\'s rapists * 2) I agree that "being down with sexually assaulting women" DOES make him a nutball * 3) saying your daughter is a hot pieces of ass that you\'d date if she wasn\'t your daughter is weird but not quite "nutball" material * 4) banning all muslims is a policy stance that\'s impractical but does a good job of connecting him to his voters * 5) I don\'t recall what "calling a war veteran a liar" refers to * 6) attacking a dead soldier\'s family is stupid but not nutball (because it\'s a self-punishing crime) * 7) claiming your opponent is a drug addict is run-of-the-mill politics * 8) the anti-semitic remarks haven\'t been as prevalent (until perhaps this past weekend) and are undermined by his having jewish grandchildren * 9) his racist statements against latinos and blacks DO make him a nutjob (and his attack on the Mexican judge is particularly odious) * 10) fat-shaming beauty-pageant contestants and not apologozing for it after becomeing a politician is nutjob territory * 11) his obstinate birtherism absolutely makes him a nutjob * 12) attacking folks that oppose him is run-of-the-mill politics * 13) and the public sexism is self-punishing silliness']]

classify and reply

['>>{Crappypunk} : What is the light blue dot on my indeed app, its lighter than usual', '>>{MechaSandstar} : Gary Johnson Equates Syria Deaths Caused by Assad and West', ">>{TypeCorrectGetBanned} : Maybe nt just in Syria, but the west has killed way too many people in the Middle East the last few decades and I'm glad someone is starting to talk about it from inside our ranks. It's not Ok when we do it either.", ">>{grepnork} : Inauguration: Donald Trump supporters boo mention of 'immigrants' during speech", ">>{blackesthearted} : I have way too many cases, but I've been using this [Caseology Parallax](https://smile.amazon.com/iPhone-Caseology-Parallax-Geometric-Textured/dp/B01KKWFDVS/) case in mint green lately and it's probably my favorite so far. Lightweight and grippy and relatively low-profile.", ">>{taboo007} : Going with apple's leather case. Don't drop my phone often so I don't need that much protection.", ">>{outlander22} : I personally really enjoy the [Nodus](https://noduscollection.com/) Shell Case, although I can't seem to find it in their website for the 7+ (on mobile at least) so they may be sold out? Either way, couldn't recommend the Nodus Shell case enough.", '>>{BreZel85} : Apple Leather Case. Feels good in the hand. Ladies! You know the deal!', '>>{SebastianJanssen} : I don\'t think a person cares where the bomb that is about to hit him originated. "Oh, this one is from the US and is actually trying to save me. How iro--" BOOM!', '>>{Astrozombie79} : Surprise.. there\'s some stupid racists at the inauguration. Would you believe that there are some dumb mother fuckers in this country that think that every legal immigrant is as bad as one here illegally? Would you believe that some people are extremists and that most likely trump, and many of his supporters don\'t agree with that view? The left loves to celebrate its diversity and openness to all views, except when it\'s talking about "the right" then it\'s they must all the think the exact same. Not possible that hillary checked some boxes for them but trump checked more..', '>>{vakenT} : I currently use a saddle brown leather case. I love how it changes with time.', '>>{carl_mast} : So this is what Apple replaced the headphone jack with', ">>{Holmes02} : This is how it starts. The right said their hatred was limited to illegals. Now you can't even say the word immigrants, which America was founded on.", ">>{carl_mast} : They removed headphone jack, just to make it water proof. But they could've even make it water resistance without removing jack. Airpod sales hiked. Some day they may remove battery and put solar panel outside. So, we could talk under the sun, if we want to talk inside the house, we can leave phone on roof and use Airpods.", '>>{ryanbliss} : What happens when you swap the two apps. Put the dark one in the light ones spot', '>>{spencerfalco} : and then he pointed to a globe to demonstrate syria which he place in the center of columbus indiana and russia which is in the catskills', ">>{MechaSandstar} : I dunno. Do you let the head of a government kill it's own citizens, because, while trying to save them, you might kill some also?", '>>{taboo007} : Yeah idk whether to get storm grey or midnight blue.', ">>{Steak-and-Beans} : Funny come from people who likely wouldn't exist if their parents didn't seek a better life and immigrate here.", ">>{Vladimir_Putin_Work} : We don't even take care of the people here, why do we need more people? Especially since we're getting the shit of other countries. What has ever been improved by adding Somalian's to it?", '>>{thewizardofash} : They mean the same thing. The shade is determined on the background and where the dot will lay on.', '>>{RoadsideBandit} : When you say "*The left loves to celebrate its diversity and openness to all views, except when it\'s talking about "the right" then it\'s they must all the think the exact same.*" you are doing exactly what you accuse the left of doing by categorizing the actions of an entire group by the actions of a smaller number of its members.', ">>{9548736} : What type of case are you going for? Ultra thin/minimalistic, slim/semi protective or a rugged case? I like Peel's cases for the first option, as well as the Ringke Slim in SF Black. Caudabe the Veil and Spigen Air Skin I've heard are decent but never tried them. Apple Leather Cases for the lower end of protection of slim cases, for a slim but more protective case than Apple's leather/silicon I really love the Native Union Clic 360 British Canvas case, looks classy and gets some unique wear over time. Dropped my 6S Plus a few times already with that case from waist height onto concrete once and tile floor twice with no damage to the case or phone(except some white stuff from the concrete that rubbed off and there was only a small scuff left.) Seems nice for everyday usage. They also have a wooden case with the same design as the Clic 360 but it's snap-on so it leaves the buttons uncovered. That one is also available in real marble which looks pretty cool and the whole marble aesthetic seems to be really popular but it's $90 so not really a good option unless you really really want it, it seems too expensive for a case but everyone has different opinions on that type of stuff. EDIT:** Just checked the Native Union site, they're actually running a sale right now and the 7 Plus marble case is $71.99, still quite expensive but a slight discount. http://www.nativeunion.com/clic-marble/ Some of Incipio's cases are decent (Rival, NGP, Octane) but the DualPro are thick and the back piece is a smudge/grease/fingerprint magnet that annoys me incredibly. Spigen's cases are all really nice too for the price. (Neo Hybrid and Rugged Capsule are great.) - Stay away from the Spigen Thin Fit, the Ringke Slim is far nicer. The clear cases always seem to go yellow quickly as well, at least the ones I've had. Caseology makes decent cases but for that price I'd prefer Spigen or a couple more bucks for the Native Union (which runs $19.99 on Amazon, it's $40 on the site normally but they have a sale so it's the same as amazon - the amazon ones are genuine btw) As far as rugged I've only used the LifeProof and Otterbox Defender, they were great as far as protection I would recommend them but I'm just not a big rugged case type. I've tried all the cases I mentioned btw except the Spigen Air Skin, Caudabe and the wood or marble Native Union ones.", ">>{KikiFlowers} : It's funny because we helped to fund Al Qaeda, back when they were the Mujahadeen, because they were fighting against the Soviets. And then helped ISIS in Iraq by leaving a ton of equipment behind for the Iraqi military that mostly didn't care.", '>>{TypeCorrectGetBanned} : A self perpetuating enemy that continues to be there for the military industrial complex to sell weapons against. It\'s almost like its purposeful and the people selling the weapons don\'t give a shit about "sides".', ">>{itsme92} : I've got midnight blue and think it looks great.", ">>{Crappypunk} : That is not the reason. I've moved the app around and it's the same color, I have however moved the darker ones and they appear a bit lighter but not that light.", '>>{JayTee12} : I thought it was pretty telling when Trump referred to Syrian refugees in Germany as "illegals".', '>>{ennTOXX} : Meeting: "Now what to do with that empty space" "We have those pieces of plastic" "That\'s a great idea" Makes total sense now', ">>{Risley} : I was shocked to hear people booing schumer when he said the constitution protects us all regardless of age, gender, race, sexual orientation. So were they saying people shouldn't be protected?", '>>{curiousjessie} : yeah, what taboo said, The Apple leather case is pretty standard and go to case for a lot of people. wood cases used to be pretty popular. Grovemade seems to be a good company to go to. And if you really want something different and stylish. you should try a real marble iphone case from MIKOL, they offer the option to engrave which is great. More protection, otterbox you should look up digital trends. they have a top 40 list of iphone cases', ">>{UncleLover} : I'm using the Spigen Tough Armor Case. Goes well with Black one.", '>>{Crappypunk} : At first I thought it was a new widget was added as well as the app because when I went to edit widgets it turned back to the normal dark blue but there was no widget for that app', ">>{uma100} : He's right, we need to value all human life and we should be held accountable for those deaths. It's not okay to sweep them under the rug because it was the United States and we are above reproach. It's why a lot of Muslims around the world who were on the side of the U.S. after 9/11 have become more sympathetic to terrorists.", ">>{Fluffybro_Jr} : I'm guessing that the more recent an app was updated, the darker the blue is, and after time passes it changes to a lighter blue. Same thing happens in Messages. Recent messages are darker and older are lighter.", ">>{brad4498} : Not sure if you're a troll or not but literally everyone in this country is here because a relative, no matter how far back up the chain, immigrated. The only ones who can say otherwise are native Americans and they were nearly wiped out by immigrants.", '>>{johnfrance} : To what extent does a government have the right to suppress rebellion?', '>>{wilc8650} : The point is this is an inauguration for the President of the United States...', '>>{Goddard_von_Braun} : Without Jack this phone will be no Rose and will sink like the Titanic. Okay, leaving now...', ">>{crizzyg} : I use the clear otterbox symmetry. It's a great case, very durable. Only complaint is that the sides are turning color. A pale yucky brown. I'm looking to buy something else.", '>>{Astrozombie79} : Or maybe the boxes that were against the party that said "hey white guys here\'s something we think you could do a little better." Maybe an overwhelming amount of that kind of bullshit caused people to check out on the Democrat Party.', '>>{i_like_reddit_} : The lighter the blue dot, the longer it has been sitting there updated, but unopened. Similar to how iMessage works. The newest messages are dark blue but earlier in the thread they go light blue.', ">>{Crappypunk} : This isn't the reason, i manually updated all the apps at the same time", '>>{MechaSandstar} : I dunno, to be honest. Why are we okay with Assad killing his own citizens in Syria, but get angry when our government scans our emails? You might protest "but I\'m not okay with it!" then what would you prefer the US government do to stop it, if not bombing Assad or ISIS?', '>>{Vladimir_Putin_Work} : When there was no welfare, and you were looking to contribute. Now days not so much, and if you believe that you\'re not living in reality. Also the "natives" immigrated here too at one point.', ">>{Whipit} : TLDR : Maybe this little piece of plastic makes the phone waterproof, maybe it improves the altimeter, uh maybe it gives the phones Xtra bass. We don't know shit.", '>>{enragedbreakfast} : Did has it had a couple updates since you opened it maybe?', '>>{Crappypunk} : Nah, it did it to another app as well. I was just wondering if it was something special', ">>{i_like_reddit_} : I mean, it is the reason. I don't know why you have 2 apps updated at the same they are different but the blue goes lighter the longer it's been there.", '>>{mithusingh32} : Everyone already knows whats coming next. iPhone 7s - NOW WITH HEADPHONE JACK', ">>{johnfrance} : Sovereignty is the big thing. With the emails it our government, with what Assad is doing in Syria, and I'm not sure we have anymore authority to crack down on him cracking down on rebellion than say Mexico would have bombing the NSA data centre to save us from that. Those are obviously different in magnitude but I'm not sure they are different in type. Now if Assad wanted us to help him fight Isis, then by all means we should, though within the parameters that he is requesting help in. It's just to some extent I'm skeptical of the degree and severity to which Assad has truely exerted unjustified force since I'm personally not in Syria and I'm very distrustful that the media will give us a accurate portrayal of what's going on. Assad was one of the few leaders that wasn't willing American exploitation within the country, and the US has a bad track record in playing nice with countries like that (Iraq, Iran, Libya etc.) and I'd really hate to find out that Assad was actually a good leader after we've already deposed them, like Ghadaffi was. The dude wasn't perfect, but all in all, compaired to the par for the course in the Middle East and Africa, it's a damn shame what happened to him.", '>>{codexcdm} : Rose Gold? I mean, they did make a big deal out of that last time.', ">>{CaptainSharkFin} : ...Didn't the Mujahadeen become the Taliban? Just as, if not much, worse, but I feel like I remember reading from somewhere that Al Qaeda came to power in a different way.", '>>{KikiFlowers} : You\'re probably right, it\'s hard to keep track of all this. Either way, we spent a lot to "stop" communism. Or just overthrowing a government because we\'re bored.', ">>{reluctant_typer} : Maybe they are annoyed at the insinuation trump will discriminate and they don't like being lectured by a sore loser.", ">>{DragoonDM} : > So were they saying people shouldn't be protected? Yep. Only land-owning white men should have legal representation and protection, apparently.", '>>{vquantum} : Apple wants everyone to forget about the headphone jack to "invent" it in 5 years.', '>>{TheHungryRabbit} : Blue dot = unopened app Light-blue dot = unopened update app', ">>{Gunzbngbng} : And he's not wrong. We've caused a power vacuum in Iraq, armed the rebels in Syria, and Russia started bombing, so we started bombing. Our actions have led to over a million dead in Iraq and half a million dead in Syria. A good portion of that blood is on our hands. And has it made the world any safer? Any better? Hell no.", '>>{Donald_J_Putin} : Except Trump has a history of discriminating in his businesses. Why expect different now?', '>>{IHaveVariedInterests} : We had the courage to bring it back', '>>{agracadabara} : https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPhone+7+Teardown/67382 >Teardown Update: According to Apple, this plastic component is a barometric vent. With the added ingress protection afforded by the watertight seal, the iPhone uses this baffle to equalize the internal and atmospheric pressures in order to have an accurate altimeter.', '>>{Donald_J_Putin} : > Also the "natives" immigrated here too at one point. There wasn\'t a country or people living here when they did.', ">>{Ree81} : It's not a bad point. I think it's a very **very** interesting thing to discuss. Can Apple even go back on a decision like this? What would have to happen for them to basically admit they were wrong and take a **Huuuuuge** PR hit doing it? Their brand would be seriously hurt by doing so, because it would mean Apple might not be so great they once were. Besides, they're pretty arrogant to begin with, removing the jack and all. They won't budge that stubbornness any time soon. So yeah, I don't see it happening unless they lose something like... >30% of all phone sales, in such a short period that it's obvious that it's the jack's fault.", ">>{DietSpite} : I'm curious what the reaction would be if they announced that next year's iPhone is the same as the 7, but has two hours less battery life, isn't waterproof, and has a headphone jack.", ">>{TheOfficialJonSnow} : We're literally a country built off the backs of immigrants (I'm one myself) and the irony that likely somewhere down the line these asshats are also related to immigrants is lost on them.", '>>{robjpod} : Put that in your floppy disk drive or CD drive. Oh wait...', ">>{brad4498} : By default they aren't looking to contribute? Just coming here to live off your hard work? If you have a problem with welfare there's plenty of people here already that should be your focus, not immigrants.", ">>{reluctant_typer} : And the Clintons were members at an all white country club. I don't remember the outrage then.", ">>{PrometheusDsign} : I honestly don't get what everyone's issue is with the headphone jack being removed, the iPhone 7 comes with a connecter for it in the pack, and given a few months you'll be able to pick up a cheap one from the pound store. If people have a genuine reason for hating the move please let me know, as so far all the posts I've seen from friends have been typical apple bashing but with no substance. Does it degrade the sound to use the connecter?", ">>{CountChoculahh} : Your use of apostrophes is giving me a headache. Take your own advice and don't have kids.", ">>{Vladimir_Putin_Work} : The one apostrophe is giving you problems? Pathetic, just like Obama's legacy... Oh wait he won't have one since he barely got any bills passed and relied on executive orders. You're weak.", ">>{mooncrow} : Isn't the main thing removing the jack does is eliminate all third-party commerce?'No more Square, PayPal, and any other card reader dongle? Locks everyone into Apple.", '>>{notmyfoot} : My nose started to bleed trying to read that.', ">>{SwagSlingingSlasher} : I won't be able to charge my phone in my car while listening to a podcast anymore", ">>{damnisuckatreddit} : Even funnier, I'd wager they hate Native Americans too. It's really not about immigration.", '>>{neroiscariot} : And they want to fuck her, or at least watch God Daddy fuck her while they watch in the corner.', ">>{CountChoculahh} : You understand how the government works, right? So you should understand that with an obstructionist congress, it would be near impossible to get bills passed and would need to rely on executive orders. But facts don't do much for you. Also, props on appropriate apostrophe use, gold star!", ">>{Jabba_De_Kut} : I'd rather have English as a second language than to be a snarky self-righteous asshole.", '>>{bynapkinart} : Protected to the right means "extra rights". They have no concept of why anyone would need to be protected explicitly by law, because you don\'t need protection when you\'re overwhelmingly white and straight in this country.', '>>{justablur} : Republicans booed a gay soldier at one of their debates in 2011. Why are we surprised?', ">>{damnisuckatreddit} : I don't think there's a single family in the country without immigrant ancestors. Even tribal native families have intermixed over the centuries.", '>>{brazillion} : But oppressed religious minorities in Great Britain who set sail for the colonies were obviously not refugees or illegals. /s', ">>{vanilla_coffee} : there's a big difference between being the discriminator and partaking in a business that discriminates", '>>{mithusingh32} : before anyone says I\'m an Android fan boy, I\'ve come to term with people buying and using iOS (I myself have though about having an iOS just so I can develop on it). iPhone is just thinking of this: "Take jack away, the dumb asses will buy iPhone 7. We\'ll wait a few months and make a plus that has a jack to sell to rest of the consumers." They are trying to set a trend, but it\'s not going to work because most android/window OEM wont ditch the 3.5 mm jack because its a multi-industry standard. What were the differences between iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 plus? Screen size, what was trending? Bigger screens. Nexus 6, Note series, Honor 5, etc etc. And imo the plus did pretty well. And now 5.5 is a mobile standard. If apple really wanted to set a trend they should have jumped on the USB-C train before Nexus and many others did. I honestly would have applauded them, but they missed that train. Its said because in the Audio industry firewire/thunderbolt used be the norm (and for a good reason), but I\'ve noticed that when audio companies make newer edition of hardware you\'ll see USB editions and firewire/thunferbolt (when older edition you\'ll see only firewire or thunderbolt). Apple did set industry standard as form goes. I will give them that. But software has always been their downfall. But with this move in my opinion, they\'ve just shot themselves in the foot.', ">>{Vladimir_Putin_Work} : He had two years of complete control.(Fact) It's obvious to me, you don't understand how shit works. Enjoy the next 8 years, and say good bye to all of Obama's bullshit.", ">>{CountChoculahh} : Well let's see, in those two years he had to deal with a massive recession, the ensuing bailout, two wars and healthcare reform. Look back at 2010 and tell me he didn't get shit done.", '>>{vanilla_coffee} : if you build a house and the next guy burns it down, you still have a legacy of building that house and that other dude has the legacy of burning it down', ">>{the_enginerdd} : But America was founded on the *right* kind of immigrants, not the wrong kind! Never mind that immigrants tend to be the hardest workers in the workforce, who will do the jobs no American-born people would dream of doing. Of course it's these same immigrants who are ruining America. /s", ">>{MELSU} : Or they use the adaptor lol... Most cards can't be read with those any more either way...if it's chipped, that's a no go.", ">>{Vladimir_Putin_Work} : Look up at what rates immigrants are on welfare. Then look up Somalian's on welfare, and then get back to me with your virtue signaling bullshit. All that progressive bullshit is done.", ">>{Nazck} : I never seen them until recently, are the a US thing? How's it better than say contactless or chip n pin? Is it more open so anyone can have them?", ">>{snarkasonne} : > He had two years of complete control.(Fact) Aww, someone doesnt understand super majorities. How cute! > It's obvious to me, you don't understand how shit works. Awww, and he doesnt even get the irony.... what a precious wittle snowflake you are!", ">>{Ree81} : > the iPhone 7 comes with a connecter for it in the pack That doesn't make it better.", ">>{PrometheusDsign} : And I can't put Blu Ray's in my VHS player. Technology moves on. I'm taking it you're using a cassette or plugging in a jack directly to the player? So your more then happy spending £700 on a brand new iPhone but not £30-£50 on a car stereo with bluetooth connectivity. Like I said it may not be better but I'd like to see an example of how it's worse, not why your not happy not being able to use it with a cassette player or such. Although that being said I see the annoyance and you'd like to think a company as big as Apple would have thought about releasing the cable to charge and use the Lightning connector with the phone when you're paying £700 for the thing", ">>{mikoul} : > should have legal representation and protection don't forget the guns... /s", ">>{Vladimir_Putin_Work} : It's Bush's fault lol. Lefty's are losers. It's always someone else's fault lol. Pathetic.", ">>{sanjugo} : Apple keep trying to limit user options to proprietary shit that no one cares about. You only need to remember their stubbornness to use motorola processors instead of Intel. How about the time when they wanted everyone to use firewire? And after years of trying to push for OSX they later introduced bootcamp so users could run Windows. They really go all out to force you into their system. Sorry but the audiophiles, DJs and anyone with thousand dollar equipment who care about music and videos are not going to buy into this crap just yet. My advice is to avoid Apple for at least a year or two until they make something that's actually worth looking at.", '>>{Jmarberg} : With no audio jack you wont be able to play via aux no more, even though it is the most according source of playing music, what about that?', '>>{PrometheusDsign} : I\'ll be honest, I\'m not sure on the definition of "according source of music". All I know is that for car stereo\'s usb is preferable over aux, and guess what? It also charges your phone. Blue tooth was an example.', '>>{grtkbrandon} : Like Trump, these people are "me first."', ">>{TheOfficialJonSnow} : Sure they are. I'm specifically talking about the people that choose to boo at the sentiment that whether we are immigrant or native born we are all equal as presented by Schumer.", ">>{EnaiSiaion} : > isn't waterproof, and has a headphone jack. My Z Ultra is waterproof and has a headphone jack.", ">>{Brannagain} : >And the Clintons were members at an all white country club. I don't remember the outrage then. Clinton lost, get over it.", '>>{Ree81} : > > > > > Apple did set industry standard as form goes. I will give them that. I actually want a square phone now. Same thinness and everything, just square. :P', ">>{Vladimir_Putin_Work} : Lol Jesus Christ you fuckers are salty. It's going to be a hilarious 8 years.", '>>{AkirIkasu} : If the folks at Mashable honestly believe that taking out a headphone jack was what they needed to add optical image stabilization, they are clearly insane.', ">>{mielcal} : lol ain't no Trump supporter hate ethnic European white immigration. What they really mean is that that they don't want the wrong sort of immigrants.", '>>{brad4498} : Should I also pull the number of whites people. What about European descent? Or should I just focus specifically on Somalia?', ">>{thesctt} : Some of us have cars that can't have the head unit replaced so easily. My head unit controls my ac as well, where's my 100 dollar replacement stereo?", ">>{walrus_of_fate} : Apple removed the headphone jack because it also happens to own one of the biggest wireless headphone companies in the world. Apple removed the headphone jack to make their costly acquisition of Beats profitable. That's it. End of story.", '>>{TheDrumpfMaker} : Oh yeah, buster? I want a round phone to make my round smartwatch!!', '>>{Ree81} : No. Not less. "Less" is the wrong word to use in this circumstance.', ">>{Vladimir_Putin_Work} : Immigrants. Doesn't matter the color. You can check into Somalian's, as they seem especially worthless. I don't care, just no more false narratives that seem to be the neocon neoliberal way the past 20-30 years.", '>>{Highfibercarpet} : Yep. Exactly. Yet so many people twisting themselves into knots trying to make it about "better" and "courage" Bullshit money grab is all it is', ">>{brad4498} : Newsflash: you'll never stop immigration. In fact our country encourages it. Now illegal immigration is something that a lot of people want to stop. But you'll never stop immigration. If they have to, they'll marry their way like Melania.", ">>{PrometheusDsign} : Under the passenger seat if it's anything like my car. My cars 20 years old so I put the CD player under the passenger seat to preserve the original interior, had to replace the speakers too as the sound quality was awful.", ">>{DietSpite} : It feels like a cheap shot to point out that Xperias have a reputation for failed waterproofing, but I'm going to do it anyway.", '>>{nomadofwaves} : I see it was as classy as I expected it to be.', ">>{DietSpite} : Too bad you're just the regular kind of asshole.", '>>{vegastar7} : The whole notion of simply hating illegal immigrants is ridiculous anyway: what separates a legal and an illegal immigrant? Just a few pieces of paper, like a social security card or a drivers license. Do people seriously think xenophobes would ask for identification before harassing a guy with an accent?', ">>{kiramis} : This is true, but we are also a country built largely on coal and oil. So just because something was once the case doesn't it has to or even should remain the case. So while everyone should respect legal immigrants there are valid reason for advocating a reduction in legal immigration: with climate change actually being among them, because US citizens produce much green house gases per capita than in most other countries.", ">>{snarkasonne} : I guess telling you how government works is being salty, huh? ok. > It's going to be a hilarious 8 years. Good luck with that. On Day One, Trump just fucked working class ability to buy a house, and declared he wants a new missile defense system to protect against Iran... The only hilarious thing about the upcoming years is going to be watching the mental gymnastics you guys go through to deny reality and pretend like somehow Trump is helping America when he lets his buddies steal from us.", ">>{biggles7268} : Clinton's aren't in power so who gives a flying fuck. Sorry to have to tell you this, but using them as the boogeyman won't work anymore. They are done and gone. You precious Republican snowflakes are going to have to start taking responsibility for yourselves now.", ">>{nicksteron} : No, no. It's bigly, I assure you.", '>>{agentanaranjado} : Check out his profile and user name. Redditor for 9 days with weird grammar and syntax. You are arguing with a Russian troll pushing a xenophobic, anti-Semitic, white nationalist agenda. Just wanted to spare you some time and brain cells.', ">>{AtomicKoala} : Eh, without such regulation you'd have far more people trying to come to the West. You can't deal with that.", '>>{morpheousmarty} : Dude, you seem to agree this is wrong so I got no beef with you, and so I tell you as a friend, this isn\'t just "some" people. It\'s a pretty significant piece of your side. If you truly think it is wrong you\'ll have to fight your own from acting on those beliefs, or wrong will be done.', ">>{morpheousmarty} : A lack of empathy for foreigners in our land won't provide us with empathy for the strangers in our land.", ">>{snarkasonne} : Again, you're showing you don't know how government works. The majority of the cost of the wars from W was kept off of his budget and pushed forward to Obama's.", ">>{Astrozombie79} : That's the thing, I hear where you're coming from. There are definitely a lot of racist idiots that are out there and they latched on..everyone I know that voted for trump, are not people I would describe as racists, bigots or otherwise. Some professors, lawyers, police officers, etc.. so I know that the entire party isn't lost and true racism wont be tolerated. I think a lot of you guys should know that, not everyone who voted for trump did so because of the brown people, many voted for him because of military and police support, financial considerations as well. There are people on both sides of the aisle that would have most likely united had the candidates been any different.", '>>{TinyBaron} : Trump is the son of an immigrant mother. So are his children.', '>>{Trailmixxx} : His actions revoked his citizenship: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1481 Or do you think that becoming a Jihadi and threatening Americans is not treason? Edited for better link', ">>{Rutzs} : What's your quota for daily pro-trump propaganda? Has the Kremlin given you a bonus since his innogoruation?"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{MechaSandstar} : Gary Johnson Equates Syria Deaths Caused by Assad and West', ">>{TypeCorrectGetBanned} : Maybe nt just in Syria, but the west has killed way too many people in the Middle East the last few decades and I'm glad someone is starting to talk about it from inside our ranks. It's not Ok when we do it either.", '>>{SebastianJanssen} : I don\'t think a person cares where the bomb that is about to hit him originated. "Oh, this one is from the US and is actually trying to save me. How iro--" BOOM!', '>>{spencerfalco} : and then he pointed to a globe to demonstrate syria which he place in the center of columbus indiana and russia which is in the catskills', ">>{MechaSandstar} : I dunno. Do you let the head of a government kill it's own citizens, because, while trying to save them, you might kill some also?", ">>{KikiFlowers} : It's funny because we helped to fund Al Qaeda, back when they were the Mujahadeen, because they were fighting against the Soviets. And then helped ISIS in Iraq by leaving a ton of equipment behind for the Iraqi military that mostly didn't care.", '>>{TypeCorrectGetBanned} : A self perpetuating enemy that continues to be there for the military industrial complex to sell weapons against. It\'s almost like its purposeful and the people selling the weapons don\'t give a shit about "sides".', ">>{uma100} : He's right, we need to value all human life and we should be held accountable for those deaths. It's not okay to sweep them under the rug because it was the United States and we are above reproach. It's why a lot of Muslims around the world who were on the side of the U.S. after 9/11 have become more sympathetic to terrorists.", '>>{johnfrance} : To what extent does a government have the right to suppress rebellion?', '>>{MechaSandstar} : I dunno, to be honest. Why are we okay with Assad killing his own citizens in Syria, but get angry when our government scans our emails? You might protest "but I\'m not okay with it!" then what would you prefer the US government do to stop it, if not bombing Assad or ISIS?', ">>{johnfrance} : Sovereignty is the big thing. With the emails it our government, with what Assad is doing in Syria, and I'm not sure we have anymore authority to crack down on him cracking down on rebellion than say Mexico would have bombing the NSA data centre to save us from that. Those are obviously different in magnitude but I'm not sure they are different in type. Now if Assad wanted us to help him fight Isis, then by all means we should, though within the parameters that he is requesting help in. It's just to some extent I'm skeptical of the degree and severity to which Assad has truely exerted unjustified force since I'm personally not in Syria and I'm very distrustful that the media will give us a accurate portrayal of what's going on. Assad was one of the few leaders that wasn't willing American exploitation within the country, and the US has a bad track record in playing nice with countries like that (Iraq, Iran, Libya etc.) and I'd really hate to find out that Assad was actually a good leader after we've already deposed them, like Ghadaffi was. The dude wasn't perfect, but all in all, compaired to the par for the course in the Middle East and Africa, it's a damn shame what happened to him.", ">>{CaptainSharkFin} : ...Didn't the Mujahadeen become the Taliban? Just as, if not much, worse, but I feel like I remember reading from somewhere that Al Qaeda came to power in a different way.", '>>{KikiFlowers} : You\'re probably right, it\'s hard to keep track of all this. Either way, we spent a lot to "stop" communism. Or just overthrowing a government because we\'re bored.', ">>{Gunzbngbng} : And he's not wrong. We've caused a power vacuum in Iraq, armed the rebels in Syria, and Russia started bombing, so we started bombing. Our actions have led to over a million dead in Iraq and half a million dead in Syria. A good portion of that blood is on our hands. And has it made the world any safer? Any better? Hell no."], ['>>{Crappypunk} : What is the light blue dot on my indeed app, its lighter than usual', '>>{ryanbliss} : What happens when you swap the two apps. Put the dark one in the light ones spot', '>>{thewizardofash} : They mean the same thing. The shade is determined on the background and where the dot will lay on.', ">>{Crappypunk} : That is not the reason. I've moved the app around and it's the same color, I have however moved the darker ones and they appear a bit lighter but not that light.", '>>{Crappypunk} : At first I thought it was a new widget was added as well as the app because when I went to edit widgets it turned back to the normal dark blue but there was no widget for that app', ">>{Fluffybro_Jr} : I'm guessing that the more recent an app was updated, the darker the blue is, and after time passes it changes to a lighter blue. Same thing happens in Messages. Recent messages are darker and older are lighter.", '>>{i_like_reddit_} : The lighter the blue dot, the longer it has been sitting there updated, but unopened. Similar to how iMessage works. The newest messages are dark blue but earlier in the thread they go light blue.', ">>{Crappypunk} : This isn't the reason, i manually updated all the apps at the same time", '>>{enragedbreakfast} : Did has it had a couple updates since you opened it maybe?', '>>{Crappypunk} : Nah, it did it to another app as well. I was just wondering if it was something special', ">>{i_like_reddit_} : I mean, it is the reason. I don't know why you have 2 apps updated at the same they are different but the blue goes lighter the longer it's been there.", '>>{TheHungryRabbit} : Blue dot = unopened app Light-blue dot = unopened update app'], [">>{blackesthearted} : I have way too many cases, but I've been using this [Caseology Parallax](https://smile.amazon.com/iPhone-Caseology-Parallax-Geometric-Textured/dp/B01KKWFDVS/) case in mint green lately and it's probably my favorite so far. Lightweight and grippy and relatively low-profile.", ">>{taboo007} : Going with apple's leather case. Don't drop my phone often so I don't need that much protection.", ">>{outlander22} : I personally really enjoy the [Nodus](https://noduscollection.com/) Shell Case, although I can't seem to find it in their website for the 7+ (on mobile at least) so they may be sold out? Either way, couldn't recommend the Nodus Shell case enough.", '>>{BreZel85} : Apple Leather Case. Feels good in the hand. Ladies! You know the deal!', '>>{vakenT} : I currently use a saddle brown leather case. I love how it changes with time.', '>>{taboo007} : Yeah idk whether to get storm grey or midnight blue.', ">>{9548736} : What type of case are you going for? Ultra thin/minimalistic, slim/semi protective or a rugged case? I like Peel's cases for the first option, as well as the Ringke Slim in SF Black. Caudabe the Veil and Spigen Air Skin I've heard are decent but never tried them. Apple Leather Cases for the lower end of protection of slim cases, for a slim but more protective case than Apple's leather/silicon I really love the Native Union Clic 360 British Canvas case, looks classy and gets some unique wear over time. Dropped my 6S Plus a few times already with that case from waist height onto concrete once and tile floor twice with no damage to the case or phone(except some white stuff from the concrete that rubbed off and there was only a small scuff left.) Seems nice for everyday usage. They also have a wooden case with the same design as the Clic 360 but it's snap-on so it leaves the buttons uncovered. That one is also available in real marble which looks pretty cool and the whole marble aesthetic seems to be really popular but it's $90 so not really a good option unless you really really want it, it seems too expensive for a case but everyone has different opinions on that type of stuff. EDIT:** Just checked the Native Union site, they're actually running a sale right now and the 7 Plus marble case is $71.99, still quite expensive but a slight discount. http://www.nativeunion.com/clic-marble/ Some of Incipio's cases are decent (Rival, NGP, Octane) but the DualPro are thick and the back piece is a smudge/grease/fingerprint magnet that annoys me incredibly. Spigen's cases are all really nice too for the price. (Neo Hybrid and Rugged Capsule are great.) - Stay away from the Spigen Thin Fit, the Ringke Slim is far nicer. The clear cases always seem to go yellow quickly as well, at least the ones I've had. Caseology makes decent cases but for that price I'd prefer Spigen or a couple more bucks for the Native Union (which runs $19.99 on Amazon, it's $40 on the site normally but they have a sale so it's the same as amazon - the amazon ones are genuine btw) As far as rugged I've only used the LifeProof and Otterbox Defender, they were great as far as protection I would recommend them but I'm just not a big rugged case type. I've tried all the cases I mentioned btw except the Spigen Air Skin, Caudabe and the wood or marble Native Union ones.", ">>{itsme92} : I've got midnight blue and think it looks great.", '>>{curiousjessie} : yeah, what taboo said, The Apple leather case is pretty standard and go to case for a lot of people. wood cases used to be pretty popular. Grovemade seems to be a good company to go to. And if you really want something different and stylish. you should try a real marble iphone case from MIKOL, they offer the option to engrave which is great. More protection, otterbox you should look up digital trends. they have a top 40 list of iphone cases', ">>{UncleLover} : I'm using the Spigen Tough Armor Case. Goes well with Black one.", ">>{crizzyg} : I use the clear otterbox symmetry. It's a great case, very durable. Only complaint is that the sides are turning color. A pale yucky brown. I'm looking to buy something else."], [">>{grepnork} : Inauguration: Donald Trump supporters boo mention of 'immigrants' during speech", '>>{Astrozombie79} : Surprise.. there\'s some stupid racists at the inauguration. Would you believe that there are some dumb mother fuckers in this country that think that every legal immigrant is as bad as one here illegally? Would you believe that some people are extremists and that most likely trump, and many of his supporters don\'t agree with that view? The left loves to celebrate its diversity and openness to all views, except when it\'s talking about "the right" then it\'s they must all the think the exact same. Not possible that hillary checked some boxes for them but trump checked more..', ">>{Holmes02} : This is how it starts. The right said their hatred was limited to illegals. Now you can't even say the word immigrants, which America was founded on.", ">>{Steak-and-Beans} : Funny come from people who likely wouldn't exist if their parents didn't seek a better life and immigrate here.", ">>{Vladimir_Putin_Work} : We don't even take care of the people here, why do we need more people? Especially since we're getting the shit of other countries. What has ever been improved by adding Somalian's to it?", '>>{RoadsideBandit} : When you say "*The left loves to celebrate its diversity and openness to all views, except when it\'s talking about "the right" then it\'s they must all the think the exact same.*" you are doing exactly what you accuse the left of doing by categorizing the actions of an entire group by the actions of a smaller number of its members.', '>>{JayTee12} : I thought it was pretty telling when Trump referred to Syrian refugees in Germany as "illegals".', ">>{Risley} : I was shocked to hear people booing schumer when he said the constitution protects us all regardless of age, gender, race, sexual orientation. So were they saying people shouldn't be protected?", ">>{brad4498} : Not sure if you're a troll or not but literally everyone in this country is here because a relative, no matter how far back up the chain, immigrated. The only ones who can say otherwise are native Americans and they were nearly wiped out by immigrants.", '>>{wilc8650} : The point is this is an inauguration for the President of the United States...', '>>{Astrozombie79} : Or maybe the boxes that were against the party that said "hey white guys here\'s something we think you could do a little better." Maybe an overwhelming amount of that kind of bullshit caused people to check out on the Democrat Party.', '>>{Vladimir_Putin_Work} : When there was no welfare, and you were looking to contribute. Now days not so much, and if you believe that you\'re not living in reality. Also the "natives" immigrated here too at one point.', ">>{reluctant_typer} : Maybe they are annoyed at the insinuation trump will discriminate and they don't like being lectured by a sore loser.", ">>{DragoonDM} : > So were they saying people shouldn't be protected? Yep. Only land-owning white men should have legal representation and protection, apparently.", '>>{Donald_J_Putin} : Except Trump has a history of discriminating in his businesses. Why expect different now?', '>>{Donald_J_Putin} : > Also the "natives" immigrated here too at one point. There wasn\'t a country or people living here when they did.', ">>{TheOfficialJonSnow} : We're literally a country built off the backs of immigrants (I'm one myself) and the irony that likely somewhere down the line these asshats are also related to immigrants is lost on them.", ">>{brad4498} : By default they aren't looking to contribute? Just coming here to live off your hard work? If you have a problem with welfare there's plenty of people here already that should be your focus, not immigrants.", ">>{reluctant_typer} : And the Clintons were members at an all white country club. I don't remember the outrage then.", ">>{CountChoculahh} : Your use of apostrophes is giving me a headache. Take your own advice and don't have kids.", ">>{Vladimir_Putin_Work} : The one apostrophe is giving you problems? Pathetic, just like Obama's legacy... Oh wait he won't have one since he barely got any bills passed and relied on executive orders. You're weak.", ">>{damnisuckatreddit} : Even funnier, I'd wager they hate Native Americans too. It's really not about immigration.", '>>{neroiscariot} : And they want to fuck her, or at least watch God Daddy fuck her while they watch in the corner.', ">>{CountChoculahh} : You understand how the government works, right? So you should understand that with an obstructionist congress, it would be near impossible to get bills passed and would need to rely on executive orders. But facts don't do much for you. Also, props on appropriate apostrophe use, gold star!", '>>{bynapkinart} : Protected to the right means "extra rights". They have no concept of why anyone would need to be protected explicitly by law, because you don\'t need protection when you\'re overwhelmingly white and straight in this country.', '>>{justablur} : Republicans booed a gay soldier at one of their debates in 2011. Why are we surprised?', ">>{damnisuckatreddit} : I don't think there's a single family in the country without immigrant ancestors. Even tribal native families have intermixed over the centuries.", '>>{brazillion} : But oppressed religious minorities in Great Britain who set sail for the colonies were obviously not refugees or illegals. /s', ">>{vanilla_coffee} : there's a big difference between being the discriminator and partaking in a business that discriminates", ">>{Vladimir_Putin_Work} : He had two years of complete control.(Fact) It's obvious to me, you don't understand how shit works. Enjoy the next 8 years, and say good bye to all of Obama's bullshit.", ">>{CountChoculahh} : Well let's see, in those two years he had to deal with a massive recession, the ensuing bailout, two wars and healthcare reform. Look back at 2010 and tell me he didn't get shit done.", '>>{vanilla_coffee} : if you build a house and the next guy burns it down, you still have a legacy of building that house and that other dude has the legacy of burning it down', ">>{the_enginerdd} : But America was founded on the *right* kind of immigrants, not the wrong kind! Never mind that immigrants tend to be the hardest workers in the workforce, who will do the jobs no American-born people would dream of doing. Of course it's these same immigrants who are ruining America. /s", ">>{Vladimir_Putin_Work} : Look up at what rates immigrants are on welfare. Then look up Somalian's on welfare, and then get back to me with your virtue signaling bullshit. All that progressive bullshit is done.", ">>{snarkasonne} : > He had two years of complete control.(Fact) Aww, someone doesnt understand super majorities. How cute! > It's obvious to me, you don't understand how shit works. Awww, and he doesnt even get the irony.... what a precious wittle snowflake you are!", ">>{mikoul} : > should have legal representation and protection don't forget the guns... /s", ">>{Vladimir_Putin_Work} : It's Bush's fault lol. Lefty's are losers. It's always someone else's fault lol. Pathetic.", '>>{grtkbrandon} : Like Trump, these people are "me first."', ">>{TheOfficialJonSnow} : Sure they are. I'm specifically talking about the people that choose to boo at the sentiment that whether we are immigrant or native born we are all equal as presented by Schumer.", ">>{Brannagain} : >And the Clintons were members at an all white country club. I don't remember the outrage then. Clinton lost, get over it.", ">>{Vladimir_Putin_Work} : Lol Jesus Christ you fuckers are salty. It's going to be a hilarious 8 years.", ">>{mielcal} : lol ain't no Trump supporter hate ethnic European white immigration. What they really mean is that that they don't want the wrong sort of immigrants.", '>>{brad4498} : Should I also pull the number of whites people. What about European descent? Or should I just focus specifically on Somalia?', ">>{Vladimir_Putin_Work} : Immigrants. Doesn't matter the color. You can check into Somalian's, as they seem especially worthless. I don't care, just no more false narratives that seem to be the neocon neoliberal way the past 20-30 years.", ">>{brad4498} : Newsflash: you'll never stop immigration. In fact our country encourages it. Now illegal immigration is something that a lot of people want to stop. But you'll never stop immigration. If they have to, they'll marry their way like Melania.", '>>{nomadofwaves} : I see it was as classy as I expected it to be.', '>>{vegastar7} : The whole notion of simply hating illegal immigrants is ridiculous anyway: what separates a legal and an illegal immigrant? Just a few pieces of paper, like a social security card or a drivers license. Do people seriously think xenophobes would ask for identification before harassing a guy with an accent?', ">>{kiramis} : This is true, but we are also a country built largely on coal and oil. So just because something was once the case doesn't it has to or even should remain the case. So while everyone should respect legal immigrants there are valid reason for advocating a reduction in legal immigration: with climate change actually being among them, because US citizens produce much green house gases per capita than in most other countries.", ">>{snarkasonne} : I guess telling you how government works is being salty, huh? ok. > It's going to be a hilarious 8 years. Good luck with that. On Day One, Trump just fucked working class ability to buy a house, and declared he wants a new missile defense system to protect against Iran... The only hilarious thing about the upcoming years is going to be watching the mental gymnastics you guys go through to deny reality and pretend like somehow Trump is helping America when he lets his buddies steal from us.", ">>{biggles7268} : Clinton's aren't in power so who gives a flying fuck. Sorry to have to tell you this, but using them as the boogeyman won't work anymore. They are done and gone. You precious Republican snowflakes are going to have to start taking responsibility for yourselves now.", ">>{nicksteron} : No, no. It's bigly, I assure you.", '>>{agentanaranjado} : Check out his profile and user name. Redditor for 9 days with weird grammar and syntax. You are arguing with a Russian troll pushing a xenophobic, anti-Semitic, white nationalist agenda. Just wanted to spare you some time and brain cells.', ">>{AtomicKoala} : Eh, without such regulation you'd have far more people trying to come to the West. You can't deal with that.", '>>{morpheousmarty} : Dude, you seem to agree this is wrong so I got no beef with you, and so I tell you as a friend, this isn\'t just "some" people. It\'s a pretty significant piece of your side. If you truly think it is wrong you\'ll have to fight your own from acting on those beliefs, or wrong will be done.', ">>{morpheousmarty} : A lack of empathy for foreigners in our land won't provide us with empathy for the strangers in our land.", ">>{snarkasonne} : Again, you're showing you don't know how government works. The majority of the cost of the wars from W was kept off of his budget and pushed forward to Obama's.", ">>{Astrozombie79} : That's the thing, I hear where you're coming from. There are definitely a lot of racist idiots that are out there and they latched on..everyone I know that voted for trump, are not people I would describe as racists, bigots or otherwise. Some professors, lawyers, police officers, etc.. so I know that the entire party isn't lost and true racism wont be tolerated. I think a lot of you guys should know that, not everyone who voted for trump did so because of the brown people, many voted for him because of military and police support, financial considerations as well. There are people on both sides of the aisle that would have most likely united had the candidates been any different.", '>>{TinyBaron} : Trump is the son of an immigrant mother. So are his children.', '>>{Trailmixxx} : His actions revoked his citizenship: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1481 Or do you think that becoming a Jihadi and threatening Americans is not treason? Edited for better link', ">>{Rutzs} : What's your quota for daily pro-trump propaganda? Has the Kremlin given you a bonus since his innogoruation?"], ['>>{carl_mast} : So this is what Apple replaced the headphone jack with', ">>{carl_mast} : They removed headphone jack, just to make it water proof. But they could've even make it water resistance without removing jack. Airpod sales hiked. Some day they may remove battery and put solar panel outside. So, we could talk under the sun, if we want to talk inside the house, we can leave phone on roof and use Airpods.", '>>{ennTOXX} : Meeting: "Now what to do with that empty space" "We have those pieces of plastic" "That\'s a great idea" Makes total sense now', '>>{Goddard_von_Braun} : Without Jack this phone will be no Rose and will sink like the Titanic. Okay, leaving now...', ">>{Whipit} : TLDR : Maybe this little piece of plastic makes the phone waterproof, maybe it improves the altimeter, uh maybe it gives the phones Xtra bass. We don't know shit.", '>>{mithusingh32} : Everyone already knows whats coming next. iPhone 7s - NOW WITH HEADPHONE JACK', '>>{codexcdm} : Rose Gold? I mean, they did make a big deal out of that last time.', '>>{vquantum} : Apple wants everyone to forget about the headphone jack to "invent" it in 5 years.', '>>{IHaveVariedInterests} : We had the courage to bring it back', '>>{agracadabara} : https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPhone+7+Teardown/67382 >Teardown Update: According to Apple, this plastic component is a barometric vent. With the added ingress protection afforded by the watertight seal, the iPhone uses this baffle to equalize the internal and atmospheric pressures in order to have an accurate altimeter.', ">>{Ree81} : It's not a bad point. I think it's a very **very** interesting thing to discuss. Can Apple even go back on a decision like this? What would have to happen for them to basically admit they were wrong and take a **Huuuuuge** PR hit doing it? Their brand would be seriously hurt by doing so, because it would mean Apple might not be so great they once were. Besides, they're pretty arrogant to begin with, removing the jack and all. They won't budge that stubbornness any time soon. So yeah, I don't see it happening unless they lose something like... >30% of all phone sales, in such a short period that it's obvious that it's the jack's fault.", ">>{DietSpite} : I'm curious what the reaction would be if they announced that next year's iPhone is the same as the 7, but has two hours less battery life, isn't waterproof, and has a headphone jack.", '>>{robjpod} : Put that in your floppy disk drive or CD drive. Oh wait...', ">>{PrometheusDsign} : I honestly don't get what everyone's issue is with the headphone jack being removed, the iPhone 7 comes with a connecter for it in the pack, and given a few months you'll be able to pick up a cheap one from the pound store. If people have a genuine reason for hating the move please let me know, as so far all the posts I've seen from friends have been typical apple bashing but with no substance. Does it degrade the sound to use the connecter?", ">>{mooncrow} : Isn't the main thing removing the jack does is eliminate all third-party commerce?'No more Square, PayPal, and any other card reader dongle? Locks everyone into Apple.", '>>{notmyfoot} : My nose started to bleed trying to read that.', ">>{SwagSlingingSlasher} : I won't be able to charge my phone in my car while listening to a podcast anymore", ">>{Jabba_De_Kut} : I'd rather have English as a second language than to be a snarky self-righteous asshole.", '>>{mithusingh32} : before anyone says I\'m an Android fan boy, I\'ve come to term with people buying and using iOS (I myself have though about having an iOS just so I can develop on it). iPhone is just thinking of this: "Take jack away, the dumb asses will buy iPhone 7. We\'ll wait a few months and make a plus that has a jack to sell to rest of the consumers." They are trying to set a trend, but it\'s not going to work because most android/window OEM wont ditch the 3.5 mm jack because its a multi-industry standard. What were the differences between iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 plus? Screen size, what was trending? Bigger screens. Nexus 6, Note series, Honor 5, etc etc. And imo the plus did pretty well. And now 5.5 is a mobile standard. If apple really wanted to set a trend they should have jumped on the USB-C train before Nexus and many others did. I honestly would have applauded them, but they missed that train. Its said because in the Audio industry firewire/thunderbolt used be the norm (and for a good reason), but I\'ve noticed that when audio companies make newer edition of hardware you\'ll see USB editions and firewire/thunferbolt (when older edition you\'ll see only firewire or thunderbolt). Apple did set industry standard as form goes. I will give them that. But software has always been their downfall. But with this move in my opinion, they\'ve just shot themselves in the foot.', ">>{MELSU} : Or they use the adaptor lol... Most cards can't be read with those any more either way...if it's chipped, that's a no go.", ">>{Nazck} : I never seen them until recently, are the a US thing? How's it better than say contactless or chip n pin? Is it more open so anyone can have them?", ">>{Ree81} : > the iPhone 7 comes with a connecter for it in the pack That doesn't make it better.", ">>{PrometheusDsign} : And I can't put Blu Ray's in my VHS player. Technology moves on. I'm taking it you're using a cassette or plugging in a jack directly to the player? So your more then happy spending £700 on a brand new iPhone but not £30-£50 on a car stereo with bluetooth connectivity. Like I said it may not be better but I'd like to see an example of how it's worse, not why your not happy not being able to use it with a cassette player or such. Although that being said I see the annoyance and you'd like to think a company as big as Apple would have thought about releasing the cable to charge and use the Lightning connector with the phone when you're paying £700 for the thing", ">>{sanjugo} : Apple keep trying to limit user options to proprietary shit that no one cares about. You only need to remember their stubbornness to use motorola processors instead of Intel. How about the time when they wanted everyone to use firewire? And after years of trying to push for OSX they later introduced bootcamp so users could run Windows. They really go all out to force you into their system. Sorry but the audiophiles, DJs and anyone with thousand dollar equipment who care about music and videos are not going to buy into this crap just yet. My advice is to avoid Apple for at least a year or two until they make something that's actually worth looking at.", '>>{Jmarberg} : With no audio jack you wont be able to play via aux no more, even though it is the most according source of playing music, what about that?', '>>{PrometheusDsign} : I\'ll be honest, I\'m not sure on the definition of "according source of music". All I know is that for car stereo\'s usb is preferable over aux, and guess what? It also charges your phone. Blue tooth was an example.', ">>{EnaiSiaion} : > isn't waterproof, and has a headphone jack. My Z Ultra is waterproof and has a headphone jack.", '>>{Ree81} : > > > > > Apple did set industry standard as form goes. I will give them that. I actually want a square phone now. Same thinness and everything, just square. :P', '>>{AkirIkasu} : If the folks at Mashable honestly believe that taking out a headphone jack was what they needed to add optical image stabilization, they are clearly insane.', ">>{thesctt} : Some of us have cars that can't have the head unit replaced so easily. My head unit controls my ac as well, where's my 100 dollar replacement stereo?", ">>{walrus_of_fate} : Apple removed the headphone jack because it also happens to own one of the biggest wireless headphone companies in the world. Apple removed the headphone jack to make their costly acquisition of Beats profitable. That's it. End of story.", '>>{TheDrumpfMaker} : Oh yeah, buster? I want a round phone to make my round smartwatch!!', '>>{Ree81} : No. Not less. "Less" is the wrong word to use in this circumstance.', '>>{Highfibercarpet} : Yep. Exactly. Yet so many people twisting themselves into knots trying to make it about "better" and "courage" Bullshit money grab is all it is', ">>{PrometheusDsign} : Under the passenger seat if it's anything like my car. My cars 20 years old so I put the CD player under the passenger seat to preserve the original interior, had to replace the speakers too as the sound quality was awful.", ">>{DietSpite} : It feels like a cheap shot to point out that Xperias have a reputation for failed waterproofing, but I'm going to do it anyway.", ">>{DietSpite} : Too bad you're just the regular kind of asshole."]]

classify and reply

[">>{Ovedya2011} : Let's get money out of politics! Uh, huh.", ">>{HBombthrow} : I'm glad Trump's aide assaulting their reporter hasn't stifled their desire to lie on his behalf", '>>{JimmyMcCoyJr} : Why? So she can screw them like she did the people of Alaska?', '>>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : What in gods name is this Cabinet shaping up into? Is Lorne Michaels secretly running this transition, because this feels a hell of a lot like an SNL sketch.', ">>{loki8481} : so? even if it's true, which it doesn't appear to be, how does that justify Trump's comments about his wife?", ">>{drewiepoodle} : Dude, It's a fucking clown car at this point. They're going to make Bushie's cabinet look like Rhodes Scholars and Trump's gonna make Bushie look like Dostoevsky or Kierkegaard", ">>{SATexas1} : Imma say it again and eat the downvotes again.. If the dude has helped a terrorist enter the country - I wouldn't be surprised", ">>{PapaBat} : Donald Trump being appointed president is the best thing to ever happen to George W. Bush's legacy. Bush just edged up a notch to the second to bottom rung on the shitshow ladder.", ">>{revbfc} : Don't worry, she'll most likely quit after two years.", '>>{IronTagger} : And it will mainly be done by Corporations donating through Citizens United, which she "opposes".*', '>>{skeenn} : Ya, instead she should just roll over and lose by not raising the money needed to compete nationwide', '>>{ME24601} : He wrote a scholarly article on Islamic law? *Obviously* that invalidates everything he said about Trump...', '>>{Ajreil} : The devil is always in the details. Whenever asked, she says she wants to "get unnacountable, dark money out of politics." So money will still be there, we will just know *who* is rigging the system. Also, repealing Citizens United won\'t solve all of our problems. Previous SCOTUS cases let money into politics, CU just made it worse. Even then, the governing body that\'s supposed to enfore those rules is in complete gridlock and hasn\'t done dick about corporations that break the few rules we have (such as politicians directly coordinating with super PACs).', '>>{StupidRuralAmerican} : The whole country is up for sale. We are going to witness the very crumbling of the foundations of the nation. The enemy wasnt Russia or China or ISIS. The enemy was within. It was Rural America. They fucked us beyond recourse.', '>>{Ovedya2011} : You mean like buying hours of airtime on the national networks and cable, so that I can enjoy the eventual bombardment of ad-nauseum political ads between my favorite shows, between September and October? Sure. Bring on the bullshit!', ">>{giveitago} : Donald Trump isn't mentally ill he's just unpleasant psychiatrist says.", ">>{theRealRedherring} : well, she'll screw it; but she will quit before the total fuck-up.", '>>{Ovedya2011} : On the Republican side "super PACs are evil fronts for corporate money. On the Democrat side they\'re the same, except they call them "grass roots" campaigns.', '>>{LeviathanfromMars} : Is it looking more likely that he will be a one term president?', '>>{AndrewRyansRapture} : Um, he\'s literally writing about the historical use of Sharia law. He\'s not stating "I am in favor of it" at all. This type of "reporting" makes my head hurt.', '>>{analog_stein} : Calling him mentally ill is excusing him from accountability. Nope.', '>>{mtrai} : How many times today are they gonna post this and really a scholar writing a paper on something almost 25 years ago.', '>>{Mawontalk} : This same article keeps popping up from different sources over the past few days. It\'s almost as if Dr. Frances has the disorder he\'s commenting on. In the article, Frances is quoted: >"Most amateur diagnosticians have mislabeled President Trump with the diagnosis of narcissistic personality disorder. I wrote the criteria that define this disorder, and Mr. Trump doesn\'t meet them," Frances wrote in a letter to the New York Times. Frances is presumably referring to the [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or DSM](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manual_of_Mental_Disorders). There have been 5 revisions since its creation in 1952, and Frances chaired the task force that updated it to DSM-IV in 1994. There were over 100 people who worked on the revision. To say that Frances "wrote the criteria" is a stretch, and he has been a substantial critic of the most recent DSM, DSM-V, which was put out in 2013.', ">>{WeJustOrderedBisque} : No, he didn't. He wrote about Sharia. Trumpsters unsurprisingly don't understand research.", ">>{PapaBat} : Trump is choosing his acolytes instead of qualified individuals. He values loyalty over intelligence, competence or experience. If you said nice things about him during the campaign you have a job. It's that simple.", '>>{Kharn0} : Reminds me of the Key and Peele sketch: "I have a disability" "what is it?" "I\'m an asshole"', ">>{drewiepoodle} : You know, the Republicans have control of both houses, and with any other president, I'd have said that I was kidding. But Trumpie isnt a normal president, and if he goes off the rails, they might actually impeach him.", '>>{acacia-club-road} : So that explains why his wife is always wearing that towell on her head.', ">>{PapaBat} : I didn't see anything in Harding's bio about grabbing women's pussies or choosing to trust America's enemies over our own intelligence agencies.", '>>{udownvotefacts} : keep donating democrats!! help get that money out of politics!!', '>>{Ajreil} : Sanders and Jill Stein are running grassroots campaigns. Clinton is not.', ">>{wealthy_narcissist} : I'm a psychiatrist and he most likely has a personality disorder, most likely antisocial personality disorder. That doesn't mean he is not responsible for his actions. I don't think we should call him mentally ill as doing so takes away from people who actually suffer from terrible psychiatric illnesses such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression. Edit: I will also add that this president has caused many of my patients to decompsnsate. One patient in particular lived in Nazi occupied France during WWII. Her father was a spy who was captured and executed by the SS. She has PTSD but had not experienced any symptoms for decades. Her symptoms were reactivated one night when she saw Trump's hand gestures during a debate before the election. His hand gestures reminded her of how Hitler's hands gestures during his speeches.", ">>{AsAboveSoBelow87} : He's narcissistic. I don't think there is any denying that. You have to be to run for President of the United States. Doesn't matter where you fall on the political spectrum. The audacity to think you have the best judgement to lead 320 million people is ludicrous", '>>{SandraLee48} : He has the emotional maturity of a young teenage boy.', ">>{elliotron} : I was gravitating more towards your placement of GWB at the bottom of the presidential pecking order. Harding let the country coast into a worse recession than GWB while allowing the League of Nations to atrophy instead of building coalitions like GWB did. And instead of appointing his dad's friends, Harding appointed his friends and family to Cabinet positions. On top of all that, his Cabinet sold the Navy's strategic oil reserves out from under them. I think you're right that Trump will redefine how much damage one person can do. However the only way he's been able to affect the American people is layoffs, shitty hotels, and making overt racism acceptable again, so far.", '>>{woowoodoc} : Are you trained to diagnose pathological lying and, if so, are there reasons President Trump does not fit the criteria?', '>>{wealthy_narcissist} : Pathological lying is not a psychiatric diagnosis but my experience has been that it is quite common in people with antisocial personality disorder (as is a disregard for rules and laws in general).', ">>{Bernerberry} : This is so gross and disturbing. I mean most of this money is going to ad time and that's barely gotten Hillary anything anyway. Other countries with limits on how much can be used in a campaign are so much better. The idea that a billion dollars is being used to fund a shitty political campaign is just ridiculous.", ">>{gorilla_eater} : They'd all rather have Pence in charge, they just don't want to jump the gun and piss off his voters.", ">>{IronTagger} : No thanks. I'd rather light my money on fire and then flush it down the toilet.", '>>{Wrecksomething} : So he "wrote" about it in the same sense that this hackjob website (Breitbart) is writing about it in this very article. Breitbart writes about Sharia law! Omg full circle horseshoe theory blah blumble blah.', '>>{RajivFernanDatBribe} : Giving Hillary a billion dollars is the only way to get money out of politics.', ">>{FunkyTown313} : Well, right now that's how the game is played. Until it's actually changed playing on a level playing field is the right thing to do.", '>>{NotFooledbyFools} : Hey mods, when can we ban Breitbart from this sub? 90% of their articles, including this one, are re-hosted content.', '>>{MafiaVsNinja} : Off the rails? He is the rails. The GOP wants all this.', '>>{Trorbes} : If a Christian man wrote extensively in favor of Biblically-influenced law he would ~~fit in as a GOP candidate~~ be denounced.', '>>{Correct_Your_Record} : Only 31% is from small donations, Everything else is coming from special interests.', '>>{Correct_Your_Record} : Actually it goes mostly towards air travel and payroll, She has 700+ campaign staff collecting a check.', '>>{throwmeaway69b} : How do you look at yourself in the mirror and write this shit?', ">>{Egorse} : The source is actually the Daily Caller, Brietbart published the first couple of paragraphs of the caller's article and then linked to the full article.", '>>{DickButtwoman} : Well, the military members voted overwhelmingly republican as they usually do. Ignoring the fact that the VA went to shit mostly because the Bush Administration ignored modernizing it when it was needed, and the Obama Administration had to play catch-up for years. I suppose they deserve every bit of mismanagement to come.', '>>{AndrewRyansRapture} : Breitbart advocates for Sharia law! Sound the alarm!', ">>{Plisskens_snake} : There's a lot of disappointment from the Sanders supporters because they couldn't win on individual donations. Sanders didn't have the ground game in the individual states Clinton had built over the years and that was mostly why she beat him. This can never be explained to the satisfaction of Sanders supporters.", '>>{BloodNGutz} : In which version of the DSM are you referring too?', ">>{Foggy14} : Is there any effective way to interact with these individuals? Trump doesn't seem to respond to reason.", '>>{cl33t} : > "He may be a world-class narcissist, but this doesn\'t make him mentally ill, because he does not suffer from the distress and impairment required to diagnose mental disorder," Frances wrote. How is he not impaired? He doesn\'t seem to be able to do his job. He appears to be absolutely consumed with watching television to see if people are talking about him and lashing out at all hours at anyone who utters any criticism. Add in the fact that the man seems to have alienated most of his friends and abuses those around him an I don\'t see how you don\'t have at least mild impairment.', ">>{h3rring} : Roger Stone is in control of Trump's campaign. Screencap this.", '>>{R2PDC} : That headline should be nauseating for 99.9% of the population.', '>>{Generic_Handel} : I have to admit I was one of the people who believed Trump was a pathological narcissist, and I have never been so relieved to be wrong. It just goes to prove we should listen more to experts and play armchair expert less.', ">>{please__________clap} : OP you're posting this in a liberal cesspool. They're in favor of sharia and defend islamic extremism in every opportunity they can. you won't find much love here.", '>>{tau-lepton} : Books confuse the dumb. He never advocated for Sharia.', ">>{blackontheinternets} : Does this argument apply to Donald Trump using labor overseas, or H1B's at his resort? It's just how the game is played. Hate the player, not the game.", '>>{SCarolinaSoccerNut} : That\'s like saying "the source isn\'t TYT, it\'s HuffPost." It\'s not any better.', '>>{fuckyoutoothfairy} : Can breitbart.com be blacklisted by the mods for incredibly biased "reporting"?', ">>{FunkyTown313} : Until something changes, why wouldn't it apply? Doesn't make it look any less hypocritical though.", '>>{NotLow420} : So they are really gonna go down this road? Smearing a gold star father who loves this country and carries around a pocket constitution with him. http://i.imgur.com/5noHKsb.jpg', '>>{TheCandler} : And she wants to get money out of politics huh? A *BILLION* fucking dollars? Who gets kickbacks and deals in their favor first? This is pathetic.', ">>{Scoutster13} : Of course you wouldn't be surprised. The irony is completely lost on you isn't it. LOL", ">>{Iokuas} : Oh, they understand research, don't kid yourself. This is a calculated attempt to vindicate Trump, as the average person is going to see that headline, not read the article and then decide Trump was right.", ">>{TheDarkAgniRises} : I remember yesterday, someone commented about how they can't wait for Breitbart to shit on Mr Khan's name. Fucking disgusting on both Breitbart and Donald Trump.", ">>{bcboncs} : When the media announced this 'accomplishment', my stomach literally turned. It's disgusting how she's tied to so many corporate interests and laundered money in through her Clinton Foundation to her pocket as Secretary of State from foreign nations that enact human rights violations. No candidate should ever need 500 million dollars to campaign. That's way too excessive and despicable.", '>>{satosaison} : Seriously, Breitbart must modify their article UrL by the hour to pass the filters here.', '>>{MAGwastheSHIT} : And it totally gets Trump off the hook for being a moron and attacking the family of a slain American hero! LOGIC!', '>>{loki8481} : I once wrote a paper about Nazi Germany in a history class. clearly that means I endorse the holocaust.', ">>{MAGwastheSHIT} : Someone needs to slap the shit out of Roger Stone. Hopefully one of Cpt. Khan's fellow veterans. I'm not advocating for violence, but this is low even for a scumbag like Stone.", ">>{SATexas1} : I'm not naive enough to think that this NY lawyer helping rich Saudis get Visa's and writing about sharia law, getting onstage denouncing an immigration policy, hasn't helped some bad people gain entry into the country. That probably happened, and that's why we need to screen people", '>>{h3rring} : I want to know where Ivanka is in all of this. She seemed reasonably sane. Running away as fast as she can? edit: spelling', ">>{please__________clap} : Let me write a scholarly report on the practices of beheading other children. Meanwhile, I also follow the same cult that engages in these practices. Hope you'll be tolerant about it just because it's scholarly ya know.", ">>{Scoutster13} : How does writing about Sharia law mean anything other than he has written about Shaira law? Nevermind - if he were white and not Muslim and doing the same thing something tells me you'd have a different view (which you will of course deny so don't bother).", ">>{MAGwastheSHIT} : You know Trump's kids are pissed. Daddy is not only wasting all this money, but he's destroying the brand and their very name.", '>>{FookYu315} : And it\'s neither "extensive," nor "in favor."', '>>{ME24601} : If a German writes an article on the Holocaust, are they a Nazi? I once wrote an paper on [the bombing of the King David Hotel](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing), which was committed by people who share my religion. Does this make me a terrorist as well?', '>>{FookYu315} : You realize the downvotes are because this is an incredibly stupid statement though...', '>>{MAGwastheSHIT} : These kids gonna change their name back to Drumpf when all is said and done.', '>>{onboardthetrumptrain} : Thats all this site has become. Any opposing thought is shot down.', '>>{rk119} : Exactly. Then Trump will say "Many have said, I don\'t know, but many have said Khizr Khan is an advocate for shariah over the constitution.. I don\'t know, but it\'s been said". Then they\'ll argue that mainstream media isn\'t covering the real story. Next, Trump will be viciously attacked by some fact checking journalist. All the while, these stories will exist as \'credible\' sources linked in discussions for weeks to come. Edit: when Trump says "I\'m your voice," he is talking to these people https://imgur.com/a/oILJg', '>>{Trumppered} : Yup I had a buddy get all excited the other day cuz he found a "mistake" in breitbart article. I explained to him it wasn\'t a mistake; it was purposeful misrepresentation. His excitement quickly turned to dissapointment :(', '>>{Trumppered} : Honestly? Its less about reaching the average person and more about making sure the base stays inundated with disinformation.', ">>{MODS-ARE-EVIL} : I think you have your subs mixed up. You sure you're not talking about /r/The_Donald?", ">>{seeking_horizon} : You geniuses just keep this ridicuous bombast up. You're not even listening to yourself anymore. Your dipshit presidential candidate is attacking a Gold Star family instead of just ignoring them, like he ought to have, like a sane person would have, but there's nothing that says his fanboys have to follow him right off the cliff. If there's anything you can do to help Democrats get elected, it's to keep talking like this.", ">>{cucubabba} : Let's attack this poor family even more. Pathetic. The guy lost his son fighting terrorists and the right-leaning media wants to paint it as he's a terrorist sympathized. What planet are we living on?", '>>{cucubabba} : One can only hope that Trump keeps this in the headlines. The election will be over with by mid August.', '>>{MODS-ARE-EVIL} : I dunno. Fox is pretty decent this year barring Hannity, the Five, and the B-team anchors.', ">>{mtrai} : Oh wait they already are...conversion therapy for LGBT from Mike Pence's mouth.", ">>{Iokuas} : True, but they'll see the headline on various news feeds, depending on their search history maybe even on Facebook.", ">>{PT10} : 1 in 4 people on Earth is Muslim. At that point cults become religions (like Christianity). Shariah law is not about randomly beheading children. Otherwise 1 in 4 people wouldn't be Muslim. They'd be extinct.", ">>{SATexas1} : No, I think it's a combination of shills and victims Most people understand the probability that this guy has helped some bad characters is pretty high. It probably happened, now that he's opened his yap, someone's gonna uncover his client list ... And it won't be purdy", ">>{Just_An_Average_j0e} : Yes it does. What are you not understanding? You are a part of that religion. I gave up my Christianity to write a paper in high school about the crusades. I didn't want to be a medieval terrorist.", '>>{shillmaster_9000} : Because of what? No, seriously, what about him makes you think that? Is it his height, his eyes, what?', '>>{manzoire} : Now they are trying to discredit a gold star family. Republicans are going further down the rabbit hole...', ">>{Robvicsd} : My college thesis was on the Spanish Inquisition. I can pretty much guarantee you I wasn't in favor of it.", ">>{eleven4for20} : The average person isn't following this race as closely as people posting here. By next week the average person will have forgotten this conflict happened. It would be one thing if it was Fall but it is the beginning of August.", ">>{SATexas1} : I'm watching CNN air like the khan special - it's hilarious They're giving him like open mic night - CNN is comical", '>>{FookYu315} : You have absolutely nothing to base this on. It\'s wild speculation at its finest. You made something up entirely and now claim that it\'s "highly probable." This is why I call it a stupid statement. It adds nothing to the discussion whatsoever. You can blame shills all you want but there\'s no content here, just a stupid statement. And I don\'t know what you mean by "victims" but I do see a person here that\'s playing one: >Imma say it again and eat the downvotes again..', ">>{SATexas1} : Khan is on TV whining about how people keep asking him why his website is down But he's not answering why his website is down He was an immigration lawyer yesterday - today he calls himself a civil litigation lawyer....dude has probably helped some terrorists", '>>{AndrewRyansRapture} : I included the lyrics to "Angel of Death" by Slayer with a report on Josef Mengele and got sent to principals office in high school. I liked heavy metal and they probably thought I was going to go Columbine or something.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{giveitago} : Donald Trump isn't mentally ill he's just unpleasant psychiatrist says.", '>>{analog_stein} : Calling him mentally ill is excusing him from accountability. Nope.', '>>{Mawontalk} : This same article keeps popping up from different sources over the past few days. It\'s almost as if Dr. Frances has the disorder he\'s commenting on. In the article, Frances is quoted: >"Most amateur diagnosticians have mislabeled President Trump with the diagnosis of narcissistic personality disorder. I wrote the criteria that define this disorder, and Mr. Trump doesn\'t meet them," Frances wrote in a letter to the New York Times. Frances is presumably referring to the [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or DSM](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manual_of_Mental_Disorders). There have been 5 revisions since its creation in 1952, and Frances chaired the task force that updated it to DSM-IV in 1994. There were over 100 people who worked on the revision. To say that Frances "wrote the criteria" is a stretch, and he has been a substantial critic of the most recent DSM, DSM-V, which was put out in 2013.', '>>{Kharn0} : Reminds me of the Key and Peele sketch: "I have a disability" "what is it?" "I\'m an asshole"', ">>{wealthy_narcissist} : I'm a psychiatrist and he most likely has a personality disorder, most likely antisocial personality disorder. That doesn't mean he is not responsible for his actions. I don't think we should call him mentally ill as doing so takes away from people who actually suffer from terrible psychiatric illnesses such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression. Edit: I will also add that this president has caused many of my patients to decompsnsate. One patient in particular lived in Nazi occupied France during WWII. Her father was a spy who was captured and executed by the SS. She has PTSD but had not experienced any symptoms for decades. Her symptoms were reactivated one night when she saw Trump's hand gestures during a debate before the election. His hand gestures reminded her of how Hitler's hands gestures during his speeches.", ">>{AsAboveSoBelow87} : He's narcissistic. I don't think there is any denying that. You have to be to run for President of the United States. Doesn't matter where you fall on the political spectrum. The audacity to think you have the best judgement to lead 320 million people is ludicrous", '>>{SandraLee48} : He has the emotional maturity of a young teenage boy.', '>>{woowoodoc} : Are you trained to diagnose pathological lying and, if so, are there reasons President Trump does not fit the criteria?', '>>{wealthy_narcissist} : Pathological lying is not a psychiatric diagnosis but my experience has been that it is quite common in people with antisocial personality disorder (as is a disregard for rules and laws in general).', '>>{BloodNGutz} : In which version of the DSM are you referring too?', ">>{Foggy14} : Is there any effective way to interact with these individuals? Trump doesn't seem to respond to reason.", '>>{cl33t} : > "He may be a world-class narcissist, but this doesn\'t make him mentally ill, because he does not suffer from the distress and impairment required to diagnose mental disorder," Frances wrote. How is he not impaired? He doesn\'t seem to be able to do his job. He appears to be absolutely consumed with watching television to see if people are talking about him and lashing out at all hours at anyone who utters any criticism. Add in the fact that the man seems to have alienated most of his friends and abuses those around him an I don\'t see how you don\'t have at least mild impairment.', '>>{Generic_Handel} : I have to admit I was one of the people who believed Trump was a pathological narcissist, and I have never been so relieved to be wrong. It just goes to prove we should listen more to experts and play armchair expert less.'], [">>{HBombthrow} : I'm glad Trump's aide assaulting their reporter hasn't stifled their desire to lie on his behalf", ">>{loki8481} : so? even if it's true, which it doesn't appear to be, how does that justify Trump's comments about his wife?", ">>{SATexas1} : Imma say it again and eat the downvotes again.. If the dude has helped a terrorist enter the country - I wouldn't be surprised", '>>{ME24601} : He wrote a scholarly article on Islamic law? *Obviously* that invalidates everything he said about Trump...', '>>{AndrewRyansRapture} : Um, he\'s literally writing about the historical use of Sharia law. He\'s not stating "I am in favor of it" at all. This type of "reporting" makes my head hurt.', '>>{mtrai} : How many times today are they gonna post this and really a scholar writing a paper on something almost 25 years ago.', ">>{WeJustOrderedBisque} : No, he didn't. He wrote about Sharia. Trumpsters unsurprisingly don't understand research.", '>>{acacia-club-road} : So that explains why his wife is always wearing that towell on her head.', '>>{Wrecksomething} : So he "wrote" about it in the same sense that this hackjob website (Breitbart) is writing about it in this very article. Breitbart writes about Sharia law! Omg full circle horseshoe theory blah blumble blah.', '>>{NotFooledbyFools} : Hey mods, when can we ban Breitbart from this sub? 90% of their articles, including this one, are re-hosted content.', '>>{Trorbes} : If a Christian man wrote extensively in favor of Biblically-influenced law he would ~~fit in as a GOP candidate~~ be denounced.', '>>{throwmeaway69b} : How do you look at yourself in the mirror and write this shit?', ">>{Egorse} : The source is actually the Daily Caller, Brietbart published the first couple of paragraphs of the caller's article and then linked to the full article.", '>>{AndrewRyansRapture} : Breitbart advocates for Sharia law! Sound the alarm!', ">>{h3rring} : Roger Stone is in control of Trump's campaign. Screencap this.", ">>{please__________clap} : OP you're posting this in a liberal cesspool. They're in favor of sharia and defend islamic extremism in every opportunity they can. you won't find much love here.", '>>{tau-lepton} : Books confuse the dumb. He never advocated for Sharia.', '>>{SCarolinaSoccerNut} : That\'s like saying "the source isn\'t TYT, it\'s HuffPost." It\'s not any better.', '>>{fuckyoutoothfairy} : Can breitbart.com be blacklisted by the mods for incredibly biased "reporting"?', '>>{NotLow420} : So they are really gonna go down this road? Smearing a gold star father who loves this country and carries around a pocket constitution with him. http://i.imgur.com/5noHKsb.jpg', ">>{Scoutster13} : Of course you wouldn't be surprised. The irony is completely lost on you isn't it. LOL", ">>{Iokuas} : Oh, they understand research, don't kid yourself. This is a calculated attempt to vindicate Trump, as the average person is going to see that headline, not read the article and then decide Trump was right.", ">>{TheDarkAgniRises} : I remember yesterday, someone commented about how they can't wait for Breitbart to shit on Mr Khan's name. Fucking disgusting on both Breitbart and Donald Trump.", '>>{satosaison} : Seriously, Breitbart must modify their article UrL by the hour to pass the filters here.', '>>{MAGwastheSHIT} : And it totally gets Trump off the hook for being a moron and attacking the family of a slain American hero! LOGIC!', '>>{loki8481} : I once wrote a paper about Nazi Germany in a history class. clearly that means I endorse the holocaust.', ">>{MAGwastheSHIT} : Someone needs to slap the shit out of Roger Stone. Hopefully one of Cpt. Khan's fellow veterans. I'm not advocating for violence, but this is low even for a scumbag like Stone.", ">>{SATexas1} : I'm not naive enough to think that this NY lawyer helping rich Saudis get Visa's and writing about sharia law, getting onstage denouncing an immigration policy, hasn't helped some bad people gain entry into the country. That probably happened, and that's why we need to screen people", '>>{h3rring} : I want to know where Ivanka is in all of this. She seemed reasonably sane. Running away as fast as she can? edit: spelling', ">>{please__________clap} : Let me write a scholarly report on the practices of beheading other children. Meanwhile, I also follow the same cult that engages in these practices. Hope you'll be tolerant about it just because it's scholarly ya know.", ">>{Scoutster13} : How does writing about Sharia law mean anything other than he has written about Shaira law? Nevermind - if he were white and not Muslim and doing the same thing something tells me you'd have a different view (which you will of course deny so don't bother).", ">>{MAGwastheSHIT} : You know Trump's kids are pissed. Daddy is not only wasting all this money, but he's destroying the brand and their very name.", '>>{FookYu315} : And it\'s neither "extensive," nor "in favor."', '>>{ME24601} : If a German writes an article on the Holocaust, are they a Nazi? I once wrote an paper on [the bombing of the King David Hotel](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing), which was committed by people who share my religion. Does this make me a terrorist as well?', '>>{FookYu315} : You realize the downvotes are because this is an incredibly stupid statement though...', '>>{MAGwastheSHIT} : These kids gonna change their name back to Drumpf when all is said and done.', '>>{onboardthetrumptrain} : Thats all this site has become. Any opposing thought is shot down.', '>>{rk119} : Exactly. Then Trump will say "Many have said, I don\'t know, but many have said Khizr Khan is an advocate for shariah over the constitution.. I don\'t know, but it\'s been said". Then they\'ll argue that mainstream media isn\'t covering the real story. Next, Trump will be viciously attacked by some fact checking journalist. All the while, these stories will exist as \'credible\' sources linked in discussions for weeks to come. Edit: when Trump says "I\'m your voice," he is talking to these people https://imgur.com/a/oILJg', '>>{Trumppered} : Yup I had a buddy get all excited the other day cuz he found a "mistake" in breitbart article. I explained to him it wasn\'t a mistake; it was purposeful misrepresentation. His excitement quickly turned to dissapointment :(', '>>{Trumppered} : Honestly? Its less about reaching the average person and more about making sure the base stays inundated with disinformation.', ">>{MODS-ARE-EVIL} : I think you have your subs mixed up. You sure you're not talking about /r/The_Donald?", ">>{seeking_horizon} : You geniuses just keep this ridicuous bombast up. You're not even listening to yourself anymore. Your dipshit presidential candidate is attacking a Gold Star family instead of just ignoring them, like he ought to have, like a sane person would have, but there's nothing that says his fanboys have to follow him right off the cliff. If there's anything you can do to help Democrats get elected, it's to keep talking like this.", ">>{cucubabba} : Let's attack this poor family even more. Pathetic. The guy lost his son fighting terrorists and the right-leaning media wants to paint it as he's a terrorist sympathized. What planet are we living on?", '>>{cucubabba} : One can only hope that Trump keeps this in the headlines. The election will be over with by mid August.', '>>{MODS-ARE-EVIL} : I dunno. Fox is pretty decent this year barring Hannity, the Five, and the B-team anchors.', ">>{mtrai} : Oh wait they already are...conversion therapy for LGBT from Mike Pence's mouth.", ">>{Iokuas} : True, but they'll see the headline on various news feeds, depending on their search history maybe even on Facebook.", ">>{PT10} : 1 in 4 people on Earth is Muslim. At that point cults become religions (like Christianity). Shariah law is not about randomly beheading children. Otherwise 1 in 4 people wouldn't be Muslim. They'd be extinct.", ">>{SATexas1} : No, I think it's a combination of shills and victims Most people understand the probability that this guy has helped some bad characters is pretty high. It probably happened, now that he's opened his yap, someone's gonna uncover his client list ... And it won't be purdy", ">>{Just_An_Average_j0e} : Yes it does. What are you not understanding? You are a part of that religion. I gave up my Christianity to write a paper in high school about the crusades. I didn't want to be a medieval terrorist.", '>>{shillmaster_9000} : Because of what? No, seriously, what about him makes you think that? Is it his height, his eyes, what?', '>>{manzoire} : Now they are trying to discredit a gold star family. Republicans are going further down the rabbit hole...', ">>{Robvicsd} : My college thesis was on the Spanish Inquisition. I can pretty much guarantee you I wasn't in favor of it.", ">>{eleven4for20} : The average person isn't following this race as closely as people posting here. By next week the average person will have forgotten this conflict happened. It would be one thing if it was Fall but it is the beginning of August.", ">>{SATexas1} : I'm watching CNN air like the khan special - it's hilarious They're giving him like open mic night - CNN is comical", '>>{FookYu315} : You have absolutely nothing to base this on. It\'s wild speculation at its finest. You made something up entirely and now claim that it\'s "highly probable." This is why I call it a stupid statement. It adds nothing to the discussion whatsoever. You can blame shills all you want but there\'s no content here, just a stupid statement. And I don\'t know what you mean by "victims" but I do see a person here that\'s playing one: >Imma say it again and eat the downvotes again..', ">>{SATexas1} : Khan is on TV whining about how people keep asking him why his website is down But he's not answering why his website is down He was an immigration lawyer yesterday - today he calls himself a civil litigation lawyer....dude has probably helped some terrorists", '>>{AndrewRyansRapture} : I included the lyrics to "Angel of Death" by Slayer with a report on Josef Mengele and got sent to principals office in high school. I liked heavy metal and they probably thought I was going to go Columbine or something.'], ['>>{JimmyMcCoyJr} : Why? So she can screw them like she did the people of Alaska?', '>>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : What in gods name is this Cabinet shaping up into? Is Lorne Michaels secretly running this transition, because this feels a hell of a lot like an SNL sketch.', ">>{drewiepoodle} : Dude, It's a fucking clown car at this point. They're going to make Bushie's cabinet look like Rhodes Scholars and Trump's gonna make Bushie look like Dostoevsky or Kierkegaard", ">>{PapaBat} : Donald Trump being appointed president is the best thing to ever happen to George W. Bush's legacy. Bush just edged up a notch to the second to bottom rung on the shitshow ladder.", ">>{revbfc} : Don't worry, she'll most likely quit after two years.", '>>{StupidRuralAmerican} : The whole country is up for sale. We are going to witness the very crumbling of the foundations of the nation. The enemy wasnt Russia or China or ISIS. The enemy was within. It was Rural America. They fucked us beyond recourse.', ">>{theRealRedherring} : well, she'll screw it; but she will quit before the total fuck-up.", '>>{LeviathanfromMars} : Is it looking more likely that he will be a one term president?', ">>{PapaBat} : Trump is choosing his acolytes instead of qualified individuals. He values loyalty over intelligence, competence or experience. If you said nice things about him during the campaign you have a job. It's that simple.", ">>{drewiepoodle} : You know, the Republicans have control of both houses, and with any other president, I'd have said that I was kidding. But Trumpie isnt a normal president, and if he goes off the rails, they might actually impeach him.", ">>{PapaBat} : I didn't see anything in Harding's bio about grabbing women's pussies or choosing to trust America's enemies over our own intelligence agencies.", ">>{elliotron} : I was gravitating more towards your placement of GWB at the bottom of the presidential pecking order. Harding let the country coast into a worse recession than GWB while allowing the League of Nations to atrophy instead of building coalitions like GWB did. And instead of appointing his dad's friends, Harding appointed his friends and family to Cabinet positions. On top of all that, his Cabinet sold the Navy's strategic oil reserves out from under them. I think you're right that Trump will redefine how much damage one person can do. However the only way he's been able to affect the American people is layoffs, shitty hotels, and making overt racism acceptable again, so far.", ">>{gorilla_eater} : They'd all rather have Pence in charge, they just don't want to jump the gun and piss off his voters.", '>>{MafiaVsNinja} : Off the rails? He is the rails. The GOP wants all this.', '>>{DickButtwoman} : Well, the military members voted overwhelmingly republican as they usually do. Ignoring the fact that the VA went to shit mostly because the Bush Administration ignored modernizing it when it was needed, and the Obama Administration had to play catch-up for years. I suppose they deserve every bit of mismanagement to come.'], [">>{Ovedya2011} : Let's get money out of politics! Uh, huh.", '>>{IronTagger} : And it will mainly be done by Corporations donating through Citizens United, which she "opposes".*', '>>{skeenn} : Ya, instead she should just roll over and lose by not raising the money needed to compete nationwide', '>>{Ajreil} : The devil is always in the details. Whenever asked, she says she wants to "get unnacountable, dark money out of politics." So money will still be there, we will just know *who* is rigging the system. Also, repealing Citizens United won\'t solve all of our problems. Previous SCOTUS cases let money into politics, CU just made it worse. Even then, the governing body that\'s supposed to enfore those rules is in complete gridlock and hasn\'t done dick about corporations that break the few rules we have (such as politicians directly coordinating with super PACs).', '>>{Ovedya2011} : You mean like buying hours of airtime on the national networks and cable, so that I can enjoy the eventual bombardment of ad-nauseum political ads between my favorite shows, between September and October? Sure. Bring on the bullshit!', '>>{Ovedya2011} : On the Republican side "super PACs are evil fronts for corporate money. On the Democrat side they\'re the same, except they call them "grass roots" campaigns.', '>>{udownvotefacts} : keep donating democrats!! help get that money out of politics!!', '>>{Ajreil} : Sanders and Jill Stein are running grassroots campaigns. Clinton is not.', ">>{Bernerberry} : This is so gross and disturbing. I mean most of this money is going to ad time and that's barely gotten Hillary anything anyway. Other countries with limits on how much can be used in a campaign are so much better. The idea that a billion dollars is being used to fund a shitty political campaign is just ridiculous.", ">>{IronTagger} : No thanks. I'd rather light my money on fire and then flush it down the toilet.", '>>{RajivFernanDatBribe} : Giving Hillary a billion dollars is the only way to get money out of politics.', ">>{FunkyTown313} : Well, right now that's how the game is played. Until it's actually changed playing on a level playing field is the right thing to do.", '>>{Correct_Your_Record} : Only 31% is from small donations, Everything else is coming from special interests.', '>>{Correct_Your_Record} : Actually it goes mostly towards air travel and payroll, She has 700+ campaign staff collecting a check.', ">>{Plisskens_snake} : There's a lot of disappointment from the Sanders supporters because they couldn't win on individual donations. Sanders didn't have the ground game in the individual states Clinton had built over the years and that was mostly why she beat him. This can never be explained to the satisfaction of Sanders supporters.", '>>{R2PDC} : That headline should be nauseating for 99.9% of the population.', ">>{blackontheinternets} : Does this argument apply to Donald Trump using labor overseas, or H1B's at his resort? It's just how the game is played. Hate the player, not the game.", ">>{FunkyTown313} : Until something changes, why wouldn't it apply? Doesn't make it look any less hypocritical though.", '>>{TheCandler} : And she wants to get money out of politics huh? A *BILLION* fucking dollars? Who gets kickbacks and deals in their favor first? This is pathetic.', ">>{bcboncs} : When the media announced this 'accomplishment', my stomach literally turned. It's disgusting how she's tied to so many corporate interests and laundered money in through her Clinton Foundation to her pocket as Secretary of State from foreign nations that enact human rights violations. No candidate should ever need 500 million dollars to campaign. That's way too excessive and despicable."]]

classify and reply

[">>{paraconformity} : McConnell, Ryan, Defend Khizr Khan's Son's Military Service and Sacrifice", '>>{deathpulse42} : Clinton burying Trump: $42 million to $1.3 million on hand', '>>{Backflip_Wilson} : Scott Baio Lectures Women: ‘If You’re Offended’ By Donald Trump’s Lewdness, ‘Grow Up!’', ">>{paraconformity} : >The Khan family deserves nothing less than our deepest support, respect, and gratitude, and they have every right to express themselves in any way they choose. **I am appalled that Donald Trump would disparage them** and that he had the gall to compare his own sacrifices to those of a Gold Star family. That'd be Kelly Ayotte, another swing state GOP Senator.", ">>{Firetrucker} : I think we have found Trump's new running mate.", '>>{alephnul} : Trump is an idiot and he is out of his league.', ">>{ivsciguy} : FAKE NEWS. His nominee hasn't been announced, let alone confirmed by the senate.", '>>{Ireallydontlikereddi} : To the delight of Trump supporters and conservatives, Gorsuch has also routinely sided in favor of religious liberty. He famously sided with Hobby Lobby and Little Sisters of the Poor when they claimed Obamacare’s contraceptive mandate violated their religious beliefs. Reasons not to like this pick.', '>>{20WPM} : Sons of bitches thinks that this could clean their hands.', '>>{SatanicBloodOrgy} : Words that mean nothing while these weasels close ranks with Trump.', '>>{2ndprize} : On one hand the news is drivel, but on the other hand there are so many sexy sexy ads to click', '>>{b17x} : Who are you going to blame all your problems on for the next four years?', '>>{Socrates_Burrito} : Read the article. Not confirmed as in by the senate. But his pick itself for tonight has been confirmed. Multiple media outlets have run with this so take it as you will.', '>>{The_Actual_Pope} : The next time someone tells you all liberals are special snowflakes who can\'t handle real life without getting offended, consider this: When the census department discussed allowing people to mark that they\'re of Middle Eastern or North African descent, conservative media said it\'s obama\'s evil plan to "create more victims of white privilege", and that it\'s all part of "Obama’s naked power-grab and stoking of racial animosity".', '>>{GuacamoleKick} : Poorly written headline. While true, it implies that the confirmation process is complete, when in fact it has yet to begin.', ">>{Socrates_Burrito} : They broke the story. I can't change the headline. Take it up with IJR and Reddit.", '>>{perogies} : Checked his imdb. Not surprised to see he has zero upcoming projects.', ">>{AJ_Smith} : Come on now, Bernie Sanders proved that money doesn't buy you an election", '>>{atda} : Women could grow up or we could cull the remaining cancer from society that reared its ugly head this election.', ">>{machinam2015} : Yes, good, tie yourself to this sinking ship and go down with it. Every moron who thinks like this should publicly voice it so everyone who isn't a deplorable can know to avoid them.", ">>{cstack18} : This might be the piss lord's least offensive move.", ">>{MormonMoron} : Let's get the money out of politics [says Hillary Clinton](https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/campaign-finance-reform/), clearly with her fingers crossed.", ">>{ElucidatedBrethren} : I guess this explains why Trump hasn't run any ads over the past month. So he won't self-fund a general election run, and he's sucking at getting donors on board. Good luck, Mr. Trump. Farewell and adieu to you, fair Spanish ladies. Farewell and adieu, you ladies of Spain. For we've received orders for to sail back to Boston. And so nevermore shall we see you again.", '>>{lolator123} : we only attacked trump Not like trump actively sought them out. Keep spinning though', '>>{Itsprobablysarcasm} : Maybe Joanie left you because she was tired of being picked up by the pussy, Chachi.', ">>{SaltHash} : Every right-winger's depiction of Jesus as a blonde is an example of their white privilege applied to Middle-Easterners.", '>>{slapadastic} : I think his thing back in the day was taking the virginity of young starlets.', '>>{007meow} : Every week, they come out with a statement addressing yet another controversial statement and yet, they still stand fully behind him. Party over country.', '>>{Slimerbacca} : A startup thats been around for over a century!', '>>{SingularityCentral} : The Clinton machine is a beautiful Maserati and the Trump machine is a rusted old French bicycle with no tires and bent rims.', '>>{MormonMoron} : And she being the opportunist that she is has used the SuperPAC to maximum advantage. Her website is just lip service.', '>>{BraveNewTrump} : Leave it to Bible Thumpers to protest against free shit for other people.', ">>{drlohead} : Isn't Trump a billionaire ? Didn't he say he would fund his own campaign?", ">>{007meow} : They criticized a statement that Trump made. Trump ~~lashed out~~ disparaged the Khan family in response to that criticism. He simply can not withstand any sort of criticism. [I mean, watch this clip from an interview where he responds to criticism saying that he's not known as a humble man.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1R42mFx3_ss)", '>>{UlyssesTheCat} : Not good enough. Their embrace of Trump will haunt them for the rest of their lives', '>>{zappy487} : I just read up on him. He is not a maniac, and we all knew he would slant red, but his resume is extremely long, and extremely impressive. I can honestly say he would be a good pick, considering the circumstances. Obviously, it should have been Garland.', '>>{Clenup} : How many upcoming projects do you have? lmao. "I\'m not surprised".', '>>{InsideItAllFeelsSame} : Going to copy the democrat playbook and blame Obama for the next 8 years, like they have done with Bush.', ">>{Kanzisbuddy} : Classic misdirection. The issue is Trump bragging about a sexual assault he had committed, and bragging he did it often. His language isn't as important as his assaulting women.", '>>{1000000students} : So Repubiicans want to create more victims of white privilege, if its one thing the republican party excels at it is projection Proof? look at Trumps cabinet picks, all different flavors.........of billionares nothing underscores white privilege and the creation of victims more than that', '>>{007meow} : There, I edited my post and changed the wording.', ">>{kyonu} : Not even necessarily free, but cheaper. Religious people care mostly about one thing: Stopping abortions. What does that best? Free/cheap contraceptives. I have no idea why they bitch and moan about contraceptives when it's the best way to meet their goal and ideology.", ">>{Captain_Clark} : You know what growing up is? Not requiring a candidate's sexist remarks to convince you to reject him being the tool of a foreign government which is hacking our election. But if this is what will work, so be it.", ">>{ProRom} : It's less about growing up and more about drawing the line about how we want our future president to act. Of all the Trump campaign's missteps (and that's putting it very generously) This ~~has~~ **should** to be the one that makes people think long and hard about who they're voting into office. It's nothing to shrug at like his supporters keep saying. Deep down a lot of voters know they're sickened by him. I hope they make the right choice in November.", '>>{miashaee} : Are all startups run by clear bigots too? Lol', ">>{Luis_42} : Well Clinton is just running a standard presidential campaign. In money it's comparable to 2012 its just Trump is really bad at getting donations.", '>>{ThreshingBee} : This article suffers some severe internal contradiction. It starts off calling the addition of a new ethnic group part of a plot to "support the Democrats’ narrative of a demographic shift that is reducing whites to a minority" (which is based on [research](http://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2015/demo/p25-1143.pdf?), not party proclamations). Then, most of the article is spent explaining why the addition of more ethnic groups is advisable because of current inconsistencies. The source [USA Today article](http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2016/09/30/white-house-wants-add-new-racial-category-middle-eastern-people/91322064/) is much more even-handed and informative.', ">>{President_Muffley} : These statements are pretty cowardly. They don't even mention Trump by name, much less withdraw support for his candidacy. Is there anything that Trump could say or any position he could hold that would cause them to pull their endorsements? I think they rationalize it by telling themselves they'd have a better chance of advancing their agenda (which they sincerely care about) with a President Trump than a President Clinton. But deep down, they must know he's unfit to be president. I wonder if they ever worry about how they'll explain this campaign to their kids or grandkids.", '>>{LeMot-Juste} : What was Bush blamed for that was not directly caused by him and his administration?', ">>{19djafoij02} : Both McConnell and Ryan have a dual duty to represent their districts and their party as party leaders. One of them formally de-endorsing Trump would go against the will of their party's voters and would be a serious affront to democracy within the GOP. I don't like Trump one iota, but those two men are in a ~~huge~~ yuuuuge bind.", ">>{aerosplat} : Really? Because when you actually count SuperPAC money spent on Clinton's behalf, you discover that Clinton's *total* earnings and *total* expenditures in the primary race blow Bernie out of the water. So it seems to me that the candidate that spent more won the nomination, and is most likely going to win the race. Ergo, you can buy elections.", ">>{deathtotheemperor} : >Neither McConnell nor Ryan mention Trump by name in their statements, but the repudiation of the GOP nominee is implicit in both responses. Bullshit. They're generic statements full of nothingburgers, same as the last time and the time before and the time before that. If they aren't going to rescind their endorsements of Trump, then it's worthless. If the yellow-bellied dogs don't even have the courage to mention *their own party's nominee* by name, then it's less than worthless. They're a couple of fucking cowards. Pathetic.", ">>{LeMot-Juste} : Oh, so it's rehosted content? Didn't bother clicking the article since it was obvious patronizing slime from the title.", ">>{roo-ster} : When 'growing up', at what age is sexual assault supposed to become not offensive?", '>>{eggsuckingdog} : Wow, rarely hear this. All of the depictions of Jesus as a white man for centuries. Odds are he was dark skinned with dark hair based on where he came from?', ">>{BraveNewTrump} : They bitch and moan because their real goal is, unfortunately, to punish women for having sex. That's it.", ">>{IamBenCarsonsSpleen} : She's not a moron. If the rules changed, even if you don't like them, you take advantage of them. She isn't allowed to coordinate with super pacs and has not been accused of such. Being President is all about taking advantage of situations. Hell, even Bernie had a super PAC", ">>{AdalineMaj} : Those are the rules of campaigning. Of course she's gonna use the rules, she wants to win. You're a fool if you just give your opponent an advantage.", '>>{Trumppered} : yes - trump could have responded: "I can\'t even imagine the pain the Khan\'s feel, but we can\'t let emotions stand in the way of addressing the problems we face with immigration." That\'s a totally valid response. He makes that response 1/2 the media would be fawning over "Trump showing growth with level head response to grieving parents." Nothing stopped him from saying that. But he went with "Hurr durr! Silent Muslim lady! He probably beats her into silence!!!"', ">>{reluctant_qualifier} : Jeez, somebody is reading *a lot* into the fact that the 2020 census introduces a new racial category. What's the authors point here? We shouldn't be tracking race in the census, or we should be tracking fine-grained Anglo-Swedish-Irish whiteness distinct from Italo-German whiteness?", ">>{ItsJustAJokeLol} : How do you think a president should respond when attacked? Donald Trump criticized a Fire Marshal for doing his job, and accused him of being a Hillary supporter while his rally jeered because the marshal was enforcing occupancy limits as is his job for everyone's safety. After being attacked the Marshal put out a statement later: “There’s an old adage that when a fire marshal walks into a room, milk curdles. So because we’re always looking out for public safety and trying to make certain venues go off successfully and safely, sometimes there are people that aren’t very happy with some of the rules and regulations we’re required to enforce,” Lacey explained. “But it doesn’t bother me at all.” Looks like he let it brush off him and worry about important things. Like an adult professional should. Why is Trump incapable of doing this? If a world leader criticized a Trump policy, would Trump insult his wife and religion, and then lash out at them on Twitter? Would he send American soldiers to intimidate this country? Would Trump provoke a war because he can't handle criticism without an outburst? Probably. He can be baited by a tweet.", '>>{empress-of-blandings} : What? Do you have a source? Her main superpac spent barely any money in the primary - mostly just testing it ads that were primarily targeted at trump anyway.', '>>{ShadowDirector} : Theres only so many times that someone can be "appalled" and "disgusted" by the comments of someone they have endorsed before it becomes ridiculous. I mean come on...at this point is obvious that Ryan and McConnell don\'t really want Trump. Their jobs just depend on it.', ">>{gonzone} : David Horowitz's propaganda rag just keeps reaching new lows.", '>>{Xander707} : We must never forget the people who supported Trump until the end. Especially those who vehemently defend Trumps sexual assault bragging. Every time these people poke their heads out in the future, remind them and everyone else how they proudly defended misogynistic behavior from this abhorrent candidate.', '>>{PM_ME_UR_SHOES_GIRL} : Okay. When Obama became President, Bush was blamed for the current state of the economy. Your ungrateful ass can now thank Obama for the next year and a half for giving you a wonderful economy.', '>>{MoralMidgetry} : Their role as party leaders is exactly why they need to retract their endorsements. They will take an L at the top of the ticket, but the alternative is to irreparably damage the Republican brand. It would also free up others in the party to stop doing the transparently stupid "I\'m voting for Trump but not endorsing him" dance and give them a better shot of keeping their seats.', '>>{gamechanger55} : Lol..they keep saying this shit as if it makes liberals proud that she sells her self good.', ">>{mike_gainor} : We're not here to listen to nonsense from Bob Loblaw.", '>>{19djafoij02} : It still could be see as a breach of their responsibility to the Republican rank and file, which voted Trump in. If you have them going rogue and saying "nope, my Republican Party voted to nominate Trump but fuck that I\'m going to overrule them" it\'s kind of a breach of their responsibilities and could result in a revolt from Republican lawmakers.', '>>{Kinases} : > Both McConnell and Ryan have a dual duty to represent their districts and their party as party leaders. But they have a bigger duty to their country as Americans', '>>{dagrave} : I agree, I believe we should have an equal number of liberal and conservative judges. Too much on one side or the other is never good.', ">>{Gator_Bite} : These Congressional weasels couldn't care less about this fallen soldier. They're just desperately trying to cling to their Congressional majorities and make people believe they are the legislative scumbags they happen to be. If Congressional Republicans gave a crap about fallen and injured soldiers, they wouldn't be so hellbent on cutting the funding for their VA care and needs post-conflict.", '>>{Gator_Bite} : Sincerity and integrity have never been Congressional Republican character strengths.', ">>{cybexg} : It isn't about life or quality of life. Instead, it is about control and punishing women. Seriously, it is the only explanation (control and punishment of women) that makes sense in the context of their actions and agenda", ">>{bitfriend} : Maseratis do great on paved roads (closed TV interviews) but can't go off-road. Trump is capable of walking his bike to voters, while Hilary is doing donuts in an empty walmart parking lot.", ">>{cybexg} : It isn't about life or quality of life. Instead, it is about control and punishing women. Seriously, it is the only explanation (control and punishment of women) that makes sense in the context of their actions and agenda", '>>{fe75f95aed185b273458} : You mean the title "Joanie Loves Chachi" is a lie?', ">>{Clenup} : I don't have any of course. What a dumb way to measure a person's success.", '>>{KarmaAndLies} : I\'m not sure I\'d agree with the above poster\'s "blew out" summation, but she definitely spent more than Sanders: - [Bernie Sanders](http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate.php?id=N00000528) -- Total Raised: $208,274,736, Total Spent: $202,519,369 - [Hillary Clinton](http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate.php?id=N00000019) -- Total Raised: $289,073,368, Total Spent: $212,433,823', ">>{aerosplat} : [OpenSecrets.org is your friend.](http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate.php?id=N00000019) Hillary Clinton has a *combined* (campaign + SuperPACs) total raised of $289 million, and a combined total spent of $212 million. Both of those figures beat Sanders' combined totals handily (also available on the same site). The numbers are pulled straight out of the FEC filings.", '>>{JoePesciOfGoneFishin} : I like how you said her spending "blew Bernie out of the water" but then when someone asks for stats you only give Bernie\'s. It doesn\'t look quite like a blowout if you included her total and everyone could see that it was a less than 5 percent difference.', '>>{Used_Guac_Bowl} : That is actually very low for clinton. Trump can cut his campaign a check for twice that much if he wants.', ">>{aerosplat} : >you only give Bernie's What? I linked Hillary Clinton's summary page from OpenSecrets. I cited *her* numbers. I didn't cite Bernie's but pointed out that they're available at the same source. But if you're so fucking lazy that you can't look at the link yourself, I'll add everything below. Here's [Bernie](http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate.php?id=N00000528). Here's [Hillary](http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate.php?id=N00000019). Bernie raised a total of $208 million, versus Hillary's raised total of $289 million, for a difference of $81 million that amounts to nearly 40% more raised over Bernie (note: this looks like a pretty clear blow-out to me). Bernie spent a total of $202 million, versus Hillary's spent total of $212 million, for a difference of $10 million that amounts to about 5% more spent over Bernie. Either way, the candidate that raised more and spent more won the nomination and is likely winning the general. >it was a less than 5 percent difference And the difference of votes in the primary race between Hillary and Bernie is barely over 10% of the total number of voters that participated. Narrow difference in money spent, narrow difference in victory. And again, the candidate that raised more and spent more won. Seems pretty clear cut and dry to me.", '>>{PrettyMuchBlind} : Can you not do math? 288 million vs 208 million. 288/208 = 1.385', '>>{JoePesciOfGoneFishin} : Her spending blew him out of the water "Narrow difference in money spent" Change your tune pretty quick when you have to tell the whole story.', '>>{JoePesciOfGoneFishin} : He said her "total earnings and expenditures blew him out of the water" Can you not do math on the other part he mentioned?', ">>{aerosplat} : I didn't specify just her spending. And I think it's pretty safe to say that the combined money she did raise definitely blew Sanders out of the water. I'm not changing my tune. I've just proved to you that the candidate that raised *and* spent more won the nomination and is on her way to winning the entire race. That's been the argument from the beginning -- that you can buy elections. It was in response to someone who claimed that Bernie proved you can't, implying that he had more money than Clinton, when in reality he didn't. You're just flailing around trying to reject the reality because it's inconvenient to your beliefs. Have fun with that. I'm done indulging your nonsense.", '>>{scrangos} : Why is who collects more dirty money being portrayed as a positive thing now?', ">>{Saljen} : Corrupt, mega-wealthy corpratist who takes untold billions from any corporation who is willing to bribe her vs a self-funded presidential campaign. OF COURSE SHE HAS MORE MONEY! THAT'S WHY WE DON'T WANT HER!!"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{ivsciguy} : FAKE NEWS. His nominee hasn't been announced, let alone confirmed by the senate.", '>>{Ireallydontlikereddi} : To the delight of Trump supporters and conservatives, Gorsuch has also routinely sided in favor of religious liberty. He famously sided with Hobby Lobby and Little Sisters of the Poor when they claimed Obamacare’s contraceptive mandate violated their religious beliefs. Reasons not to like this pick.', '>>{Socrates_Burrito} : Read the article. Not confirmed as in by the senate. But his pick itself for tonight has been confirmed. Multiple media outlets have run with this so take it as you will.', '>>{GuacamoleKick} : Poorly written headline. While true, it implies that the confirmation process is complete, when in fact it has yet to begin.', ">>{Socrates_Burrito} : They broke the story. I can't change the headline. Take it up with IJR and Reddit.", ">>{cstack18} : This might be the piss lord's least offensive move.", '>>{BraveNewTrump} : Leave it to Bible Thumpers to protest against free shit for other people.', '>>{zappy487} : I just read up on him. He is not a maniac, and we all knew he would slant red, but his resume is extremely long, and extremely impressive. I can honestly say he would be a good pick, considering the circumstances. Obviously, it should have been Garland.', ">>{kyonu} : Not even necessarily free, but cheaper. Religious people care mostly about one thing: Stopping abortions. What does that best? Free/cheap contraceptives. I have no idea why they bitch and moan about contraceptives when it's the best way to meet their goal and ideology.", ">>{BraveNewTrump} : They bitch and moan because their real goal is, unfortunately, to punish women for having sex. That's it.", '>>{dagrave} : I agree, I believe we should have an equal number of liberal and conservative judges. Too much on one side or the other is never good.', ">>{cybexg} : It isn't about life or quality of life. Instead, it is about control and punishing women. Seriously, it is the only explanation (control and punishment of women) that makes sense in the context of their actions and agenda", ">>{cybexg} : It isn't about life or quality of life. Instead, it is about control and punishing women. Seriously, it is the only explanation (control and punishment of women) that makes sense in the context of their actions and agenda"], [">>{paraconformity} : McConnell, Ryan, Defend Khizr Khan's Son's Military Service and Sacrifice", ">>{paraconformity} : >The Khan family deserves nothing less than our deepest support, respect, and gratitude, and they have every right to express themselves in any way they choose. **I am appalled that Donald Trump would disparage them** and that he had the gall to compare his own sacrifices to those of a Gold Star family. That'd be Kelly Ayotte, another swing state GOP Senator.", '>>{20WPM} : Sons of bitches thinks that this could clean their hands.', '>>{SatanicBloodOrgy} : Words that mean nothing while these weasels close ranks with Trump.', '>>{lolator123} : we only attacked trump Not like trump actively sought them out. Keep spinning though', '>>{007meow} : Every week, they come out with a statement addressing yet another controversial statement and yet, they still stand fully behind him. Party over country.', ">>{007meow} : They criticized a statement that Trump made. Trump ~~lashed out~~ disparaged the Khan family in response to that criticism. He simply can not withstand any sort of criticism. [I mean, watch this clip from an interview where he responds to criticism saying that he's not known as a humble man.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1R42mFx3_ss)", '>>{UlyssesTheCat} : Not good enough. Their embrace of Trump will haunt them for the rest of their lives', '>>{007meow} : There, I edited my post and changed the wording.', ">>{President_Muffley} : These statements are pretty cowardly. They don't even mention Trump by name, much less withdraw support for his candidacy. Is there anything that Trump could say or any position he could hold that would cause them to pull their endorsements? I think they rationalize it by telling themselves they'd have a better chance of advancing their agenda (which they sincerely care about) with a President Trump than a President Clinton. But deep down, they must know he's unfit to be president. I wonder if they ever worry about how they'll explain this campaign to their kids or grandkids.", ">>{19djafoij02} : Both McConnell and Ryan have a dual duty to represent their districts and their party as party leaders. One of them formally de-endorsing Trump would go against the will of their party's voters and would be a serious affront to democracy within the GOP. I don't like Trump one iota, but those two men are in a ~~huge~~ yuuuuge bind.", ">>{deathtotheemperor} : >Neither McConnell nor Ryan mention Trump by name in their statements, but the repudiation of the GOP nominee is implicit in both responses. Bullshit. They're generic statements full of nothingburgers, same as the last time and the time before and the time before that. If they aren't going to rescind their endorsements of Trump, then it's worthless. If the yellow-bellied dogs don't even have the courage to mention *their own party's nominee* by name, then it's less than worthless. They're a couple of fucking cowards. Pathetic.", '>>{Trumppered} : yes - trump could have responded: "I can\'t even imagine the pain the Khan\'s feel, but we can\'t let emotions stand in the way of addressing the problems we face with immigration." That\'s a totally valid response. He makes that response 1/2 the media would be fawning over "Trump showing growth with level head response to grieving parents." Nothing stopped him from saying that. But he went with "Hurr durr! Silent Muslim lady! He probably beats her into silence!!!"', ">>{ItsJustAJokeLol} : How do you think a president should respond when attacked? Donald Trump criticized a Fire Marshal for doing his job, and accused him of being a Hillary supporter while his rally jeered because the marshal was enforcing occupancy limits as is his job for everyone's safety. After being attacked the Marshal put out a statement later: “There’s an old adage that when a fire marshal walks into a room, milk curdles. So because we’re always looking out for public safety and trying to make certain venues go off successfully and safely, sometimes there are people that aren’t very happy with some of the rules and regulations we’re required to enforce,” Lacey explained. “But it doesn’t bother me at all.” Looks like he let it brush off him and worry about important things. Like an adult professional should. Why is Trump incapable of doing this? If a world leader criticized a Trump policy, would Trump insult his wife and religion, and then lash out at them on Twitter? Would he send American soldiers to intimidate this country? Would Trump provoke a war because he can't handle criticism without an outburst? Probably. He can be baited by a tweet.", '>>{ShadowDirector} : Theres only so many times that someone can be "appalled" and "disgusted" by the comments of someone they have endorsed before it becomes ridiculous. I mean come on...at this point is obvious that Ryan and McConnell don\'t really want Trump. Their jobs just depend on it.', '>>{MoralMidgetry} : Their role as party leaders is exactly why they need to retract their endorsements. They will take an L at the top of the ticket, but the alternative is to irreparably damage the Republican brand. It would also free up others in the party to stop doing the transparently stupid "I\'m voting for Trump but not endorsing him" dance and give them a better shot of keeping their seats.', '>>{19djafoij02} : It still could be see as a breach of their responsibility to the Republican rank and file, which voted Trump in. If you have them going rogue and saying "nope, my Republican Party voted to nominate Trump but fuck that I\'m going to overrule them" it\'s kind of a breach of their responsibilities and could result in a revolt from Republican lawmakers.', '>>{Kinases} : > Both McConnell and Ryan have a dual duty to represent their districts and their party as party leaders. But they have a bigger duty to their country as Americans', ">>{Gator_Bite} : These Congressional weasels couldn't care less about this fallen soldier. They're just desperately trying to cling to their Congressional majorities and make people believe they are the legislative scumbags they happen to be. If Congressional Republicans gave a crap about fallen and injured soldiers, they wouldn't be so hellbent on cutting the funding for their VA care and needs post-conflict.", '>>{Gator_Bite} : Sincerity and integrity have never been Congressional Republican character strengths.'], ['>>{deathpulse42} : Clinton burying Trump: $42 million to $1.3 million on hand', '>>{alephnul} : Trump is an idiot and he is out of his league.', ">>{AJ_Smith} : Come on now, Bernie Sanders proved that money doesn't buy you an election", ">>{MormonMoron} : Let's get the money out of politics [says Hillary Clinton](https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/campaign-finance-reform/), clearly with her fingers crossed.", ">>{ElucidatedBrethren} : I guess this explains why Trump hasn't run any ads over the past month. So he won't self-fund a general election run, and he's sucking at getting donors on board. Good luck, Mr. Trump. Farewell and adieu to you, fair Spanish ladies. Farewell and adieu, you ladies of Spain. For we've received orders for to sail back to Boston. And so nevermore shall we see you again.", '>>{Slimerbacca} : A startup thats been around for over a century!', '>>{SingularityCentral} : The Clinton machine is a beautiful Maserati and the Trump machine is a rusted old French bicycle with no tires and bent rims.', '>>{MormonMoron} : And she being the opportunist that she is has used the SuperPAC to maximum advantage. Her website is just lip service.', ">>{drlohead} : Isn't Trump a billionaire ? Didn't he say he would fund his own campaign?", '>>{miashaee} : Are all startups run by clear bigots too? Lol', ">>{Luis_42} : Well Clinton is just running a standard presidential campaign. In money it's comparable to 2012 its just Trump is really bad at getting donations.", ">>{aerosplat} : Really? Because when you actually count SuperPAC money spent on Clinton's behalf, you discover that Clinton's *total* earnings and *total* expenditures in the primary race blow Bernie out of the water. So it seems to me that the candidate that spent more won the nomination, and is most likely going to win the race. Ergo, you can buy elections.", ">>{IamBenCarsonsSpleen} : She's not a moron. If the rules changed, even if you don't like them, you take advantage of them. She isn't allowed to coordinate with super pacs and has not been accused of such. Being President is all about taking advantage of situations. Hell, even Bernie had a super PAC", ">>{AdalineMaj} : Those are the rules of campaigning. Of course she's gonna use the rules, she wants to win. You're a fool if you just give your opponent an advantage.", '>>{empress-of-blandings} : What? Do you have a source? Her main superpac spent barely any money in the primary - mostly just testing it ads that were primarily targeted at trump anyway.', '>>{gamechanger55} : Lol..they keep saying this shit as if it makes liberals proud that she sells her self good.', ">>{bitfriend} : Maseratis do great on paved roads (closed TV interviews) but can't go off-road. Trump is capable of walking his bike to voters, while Hilary is doing donuts in an empty walmart parking lot.", '>>{KarmaAndLies} : I\'m not sure I\'d agree with the above poster\'s "blew out" summation, but she definitely spent more than Sanders: - [Bernie Sanders](http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate.php?id=N00000528) -- Total Raised: $208,274,736, Total Spent: $202,519,369 - [Hillary Clinton](http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate.php?id=N00000019) -- Total Raised: $289,073,368, Total Spent: $212,433,823', ">>{aerosplat} : [OpenSecrets.org is your friend.](http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate.php?id=N00000019) Hillary Clinton has a *combined* (campaign + SuperPACs) total raised of $289 million, and a combined total spent of $212 million. Both of those figures beat Sanders' combined totals handily (also available on the same site). The numbers are pulled straight out of the FEC filings.", '>>{JoePesciOfGoneFishin} : I like how you said her spending "blew Bernie out of the water" but then when someone asks for stats you only give Bernie\'s. It doesn\'t look quite like a blowout if you included her total and everyone could see that it was a less than 5 percent difference.', '>>{Used_Guac_Bowl} : That is actually very low for clinton. Trump can cut his campaign a check for twice that much if he wants.', ">>{aerosplat} : >you only give Bernie's What? I linked Hillary Clinton's summary page from OpenSecrets. I cited *her* numbers. I didn't cite Bernie's but pointed out that they're available at the same source. But if you're so fucking lazy that you can't look at the link yourself, I'll add everything below. Here's [Bernie](http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate.php?id=N00000528). Here's [Hillary](http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate.php?id=N00000019). Bernie raised a total of $208 million, versus Hillary's raised total of $289 million, for a difference of $81 million that amounts to nearly 40% more raised over Bernie (note: this looks like a pretty clear blow-out to me). Bernie spent a total of $202 million, versus Hillary's spent total of $212 million, for a difference of $10 million that amounts to about 5% more spent over Bernie. Either way, the candidate that raised more and spent more won the nomination and is likely winning the general. >it was a less than 5 percent difference And the difference of votes in the primary race between Hillary and Bernie is barely over 10% of the total number of voters that participated. Narrow difference in money spent, narrow difference in victory. And again, the candidate that raised more and spent more won. Seems pretty clear cut and dry to me.", '>>{PrettyMuchBlind} : Can you not do math? 288 million vs 208 million. 288/208 = 1.385', '>>{JoePesciOfGoneFishin} : Her spending blew him out of the water "Narrow difference in money spent" Change your tune pretty quick when you have to tell the whole story.', '>>{JoePesciOfGoneFishin} : He said her "total earnings and expenditures blew him out of the water" Can you not do math on the other part he mentioned?', ">>{aerosplat} : I didn't specify just her spending. And I think it's pretty safe to say that the combined money she did raise definitely blew Sanders out of the water. I'm not changing my tune. I've just proved to you that the candidate that raised *and* spent more won the nomination and is on her way to winning the entire race. That's been the argument from the beginning -- that you can buy elections. It was in response to someone who claimed that Bernie proved you can't, implying that he had more money than Clinton, when in reality he didn't. You're just flailing around trying to reject the reality because it's inconvenient to your beliefs. Have fun with that. I'm done indulging your nonsense.", '>>{scrangos} : Why is who collects more dirty money being portrayed as a positive thing now?', ">>{Saljen} : Corrupt, mega-wealthy corpratist who takes untold billions from any corporation who is willing to bribe her vs a self-funded presidential campaign. OF COURSE SHE HAS MORE MONEY! THAT'S WHY WE DON'T WANT HER!!"], ['>>{Backflip_Wilson} : Scott Baio Lectures Women: ‘If You’re Offended’ By Donald Trump’s Lewdness, ‘Grow Up!’', ">>{Firetrucker} : I think we have found Trump's new running mate.", '>>{perogies} : Checked his imdb. Not surprised to see he has zero upcoming projects.', '>>{atda} : Women could grow up or we could cull the remaining cancer from society that reared its ugly head this election.', ">>{machinam2015} : Yes, good, tie yourself to this sinking ship and go down with it. Every moron who thinks like this should publicly voice it so everyone who isn't a deplorable can know to avoid them.", '>>{Itsprobablysarcasm} : Maybe Joanie left you because she was tired of being picked up by the pussy, Chachi.', '>>{slapadastic} : I think his thing back in the day was taking the virginity of young starlets.', '>>{Clenup} : How many upcoming projects do you have? lmao. "I\'m not surprised".', ">>{Kanzisbuddy} : Classic misdirection. The issue is Trump bragging about a sexual assault he had committed, and bragging he did it often. His language isn't as important as his assaulting women.", ">>{Captain_Clark} : You know what growing up is? Not requiring a candidate's sexist remarks to convince you to reject him being the tool of a foreign government which is hacking our election. But if this is what will work, so be it.", ">>{ProRom} : It's less about growing up and more about drawing the line about how we want our future president to act. Of all the Trump campaign's missteps (and that's putting it very generously) This ~~has~~ **should** to be the one that makes people think long and hard about who they're voting into office. It's nothing to shrug at like his supporters keep saying. Deep down a lot of voters know they're sickened by him. I hope they make the right choice in November.", ">>{roo-ster} : When 'growing up', at what age is sexual assault supposed to become not offensive?", '>>{Xander707} : We must never forget the people who supported Trump until the end. Especially those who vehemently defend Trumps sexual assault bragging. Every time these people poke their heads out in the future, remind them and everyone else how they proudly defended misogynistic behavior from this abhorrent candidate.', ">>{mike_gainor} : We're not here to listen to nonsense from Bob Loblaw.", '>>{fe75f95aed185b273458} : You mean the title "Joanie Loves Chachi" is a lie?', ">>{Clenup} : I don't have any of course. What a dumb way to measure a person's success."], ['>>{2ndprize} : On one hand the news is drivel, but on the other hand there are so many sexy sexy ads to click', '>>{b17x} : Who are you going to blame all your problems on for the next four years?', '>>{The_Actual_Pope} : The next time someone tells you all liberals are special snowflakes who can\'t handle real life without getting offended, consider this: When the census department discussed allowing people to mark that they\'re of Middle Eastern or North African descent, conservative media said it\'s obama\'s evil plan to "create more victims of white privilege", and that it\'s all part of "Obama’s naked power-grab and stoking of racial animosity".', ">>{SaltHash} : Every right-winger's depiction of Jesus as a blonde is an example of their white privilege applied to Middle-Easterners.", '>>{InsideItAllFeelsSame} : Going to copy the democrat playbook and blame Obama for the next 8 years, like they have done with Bush.', '>>{1000000students} : So Repubiicans want to create more victims of white privilege, if its one thing the republican party excels at it is projection Proof? look at Trumps cabinet picks, all different flavors.........of billionares nothing underscores white privilege and the creation of victims more than that', '>>{ThreshingBee} : This article suffers some severe internal contradiction. It starts off calling the addition of a new ethnic group part of a plot to "support the Democrats’ narrative of a demographic shift that is reducing whites to a minority" (which is based on [research](http://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2015/demo/p25-1143.pdf?), not party proclamations). Then, most of the article is spent explaining why the addition of more ethnic groups is advisable because of current inconsistencies. The source [USA Today article](http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2016/09/30/white-house-wants-add-new-racial-category-middle-eastern-people/91322064/) is much more even-handed and informative.', '>>{LeMot-Juste} : What was Bush blamed for that was not directly caused by him and his administration?', ">>{LeMot-Juste} : Oh, so it's rehosted content? Didn't bother clicking the article since it was obvious patronizing slime from the title.", '>>{eggsuckingdog} : Wow, rarely hear this. All of the depictions of Jesus as a white man for centuries. Odds are he was dark skinned with dark hair based on where he came from?', ">>{reluctant_qualifier} : Jeez, somebody is reading *a lot* into the fact that the 2020 census introduces a new racial category. What's the authors point here? We shouldn't be tracking race in the census, or we should be tracking fine-grained Anglo-Swedish-Irish whiteness distinct from Italo-German whiteness?", ">>{gonzone} : David Horowitz's propaganda rag just keeps reaching new lows.", '>>{PM_ME_UR_SHOES_GIRL} : Okay. When Obama became President, Bush was blamed for the current state of the economy. Your ungrateful ass can now thank Obama for the next year and a half for giving you a wonderful economy.']]

classify and reply

[">>{greatcaffeine} : I did that last year with the 6s Plus and 6s. It was fine, but I ultimately missed the battery life enough that I'm back on a 7 Plus this year. The camera is nice to have, but I think they made enough improvements with the regular size model to make it worthwhile as well. So in the end, it just comes down to whether or not you're willing to sacrifice that gigantic battery.", '>>{bumpkinspicefatte} : You do whatever makes you happier. There will be people who will commend or criticize you. It is your job to do what makes you happier and to not give a shit. With that being said, weigh out your values and the technical specs. These are two different models with pluses (no pun intended) and minuses. Does the smaller frame outweigh the technical differences in your value system? I am a vehement 6S owner and did not go to the 6S+. This year I will be moving onto the 7+.', '>>{YabbaDabaDo} : I wonder how the reddit master minds will spin this one to prove Apple are still doomed', ">>{TheBatmanToMyBruce} : People seem to make this mistake a lot. It's also worth noting that if you've been into subcompacts, ultraportables, netbooks, etc, you're probably used to putting up with some dongles or breakouts or other inconveniences due to the form factor.", ">>{MyPenisIsaWMD} : > Macbook Pros wipe the floor compared to a typical budget friendly Chromebook in terms of... In terms of the package you describe, I prefer my well-spec'd Chromebook, regardless of price. It's simply a faster internet terminal with an awesome screen and very decent everything else for a fraction of the cost. Everything that needs juice, I do on my desktop (couldn't do it on my Macbook anyway). Everything that doesn't require major power is far better served by my Chromebook anyway. The only reason to buy a Macbook for me any longer would be loyalty which I no longer have or a sense of fashion which has departed Apple in general anyway.", '>>{MyPenisIsaWMD} : 2 Comments up I broke it down by markets. I hardly think that I am approaching this from a single perspective.', ">>{wund3rground} : I snagged one of these cases from Best Buy and I love it. It's grippy, military drop protection, and it adds almost zero bulk. May be worth looking into. http://www.bestbuy.com/site/platinum-d30-protective-case-for-apple-iphone-7-plus-black/5559800.p?skuId=5559800", ">>{FreakTalent} : nah that one guy on /r/funny told me Apple is going to go bankrupt because they haven't innovated since Steve. I choose to believe him.", ">>{ShadowSwipe} : TBH I wouldn't want a windows laptop with 1500 specs because the battery life is probably trash. The one thing I like about my mac is the insane startup and file speeds and the great reliable long battery life. There's a reason people get them and it's not because they're junk, they may not have a lot of kick in terms of power but I did a lot of looking and as a computer guy I still went with a Mac for college because it's ease of use. I already have a badass desktop anyway .", ">>{misterkevo} : Thanks - appreciate the suggestion. I'm currently using a Spigen case - it's not as bulky as some, which is nice for sure.", '>>{irrational-pyro} : The dual camera on the plus made me switch as well. Used to have a 6S.', ">>{Vexal} : It's crazy how it's only Apple ever setting the record for iphone sales.", ">>{Axelph} : I heard they're The number one iPhone manufacturer in the US.", '>>{ThatGuyFromCanadia} : this sucks :( really wish something happens that makes them put the headphone jack back on the phone but if theyre breaking sales records that seems like a long shot', ">>{saullyj} : I went from a 6S Plus to a 6S, and then ultimately back to a 6S Plus and now to the 7 Plus. While I like the smaller form factor, I've gotten used to the bigger screen and I think the resolution is far superior. The 7's screen is really, really nice, but can't compare to the 1080p resolution. It all depends on what you use the phone for. If you're really into taking photos with the 7 Plus, you'll miss having the 56mm equivalent lens. I think the battery life is significantly better than the 7, as well.", '>>{Merovean} : I dunno, genuinely sounds like some massaged numbers... No idea how they would, but from a shareholders perspective, I could see the need to attempt some sunlight press releases given the design mediocrity of their recent offerings.', '>>{misterkevo} : The only spec differences between the 7 and 7+ are the screen size, dual camera and battery correct? Otherwise I believe the internals are identical.', ">>{RedHerringxx} : It's outdated technology. The record sales prove Apple made the right decision, despite the media frenzy around it. Seriously, it's time to get over it or switch to a device that embraces old tech.", '>>{c0rtexiphan} : I have this case and I love it! Protection all around, minimal drop protection, but very slim! http://www.spigen.com/collections/iphone-7-plus/products/iphone-7-plus-case-liquid-armor', ">>{Darkgod87} : Yep. I'm one of those guys. I'm actually enjoying iOS", '>>{ThatGuyFromCanadia} : I chose the 6s+ over the 7+ because of that choice. If it was atleast type-c then I would be okay with it but even then why would I buy headphones that I can only plug into my phone and not my laptop, desktop, tablet, or friends phones. It just sucks that apple isolated itself so much', ">>{temba_hisarmswide_} : With the Macbooks all switched over to type-C, it's about that time the iPhone get the port too.", '>>{drinkit_or_wearit} : But mah 3.5mm jack!!!11!!1', '>>{bumpkinspicefatte} : Nope, there are still several other differences, both hardware (2gb of RAM on the 7 and 3gb of RAM on the 7+) and software (portrait mode exclusive to 7+).', ">>{mysticportal} : Use the adapter or get wireless headphones which will connect to all your devices. I'm looking forward to an iPhone with no ports. Although, I wonder how it'll work for connecting to iTunes.", ">>{mysticportal} : Doesn't really matter if it's the same look as long as the new device is faster, lasts longer, and includes some new features/specs. Plus most people like showing off that they got the latest iPhone.", ">>{mcarrode} : I had a rhinoshield bumper case on my 6+. The phone was in pretty much perfect condition when I traded it in for the 7 (I have one on my 7 now). It adds a good bit of durability and keeps the phone pretty slim. It obviously won't protect the back from keys or coins in your pocket, but I make an effort to keep my phone alone in my pocket.", ">>{MyPenisIsaWMD} : >I already explained it twice Followed immediately by > for the fourth bloody time You'll excuse me for not putting too much faith in the explanation of a person who, apparently, cannot count.", ">>{mattchoo86} : I know. I don't think they'll bother putting it back in. It does suck.", ">>{epik} : I returned a plus and went all the way down to an SE. It's actually faster than the plus in opening a lot of apps for some reason, perhaps the lower resolution. I don't have issues with the smaller keyboard and don't need 3d touch or the better camera. Also, not missing haptic engine or faster fingerprint sensor. And those are about the only things the plus offer. So now I've got a lighter, more comfortable to carry iphone that is faster and has unreal battery life. ipad mini 2 was still a lot better to use for general browsing than the plus anyway.", '>>{jkslate} : After going from the Note line down to the s7 and iphone 6s line, I will never look back. The larger phones are great, but they\'re just too damn big for everyday use. I don\'t miss the larger screen, even small text isnt an issue on a 4.7" screen. I read kindle on my phone everyday and it\'s not even a slight issue. 4.7" is the perfect size for me. I\'m a 6\' 200lb guy with medium/large hands.', '>>{i_hug_peas} : I tried to make the switch to the 7 from the 6+ but I returned it after one day, the screen resolution is lower on the 7 vs the + and it makes text look fuzzy in comparison.', '>>{alexbhood} : Were they still using 2 year contracts to subsidize the price of phones back then?', ">>{elguap} : I couldn't do it after getting so adjusted to the larger display size", ">>{SprSynJn} : No offense meant. It was a joke, despite some not seeing it. I'm a sheep right along with the bunch.", ">>{alexbhood} : I've always found that skinned Android phones don't age well. The G3 didn't run very well a year ago. I don't even want to think about it now. Nexus, HTC, and Motorola phones age very well. Probably because they go light on the skinning.", ">>{caseydoeswords} : If comfort is a factor, you could consider getting one of the Love Handle straps that adheres to the back of your case. It makes the phone much more manageable IMO, and they're relatively cheap on amazon. c:", ">>{Forest_GS} : You can drop the LG G3 to 1080p from it's default 1440p and it is as smooth as those $500+ phones. Battery life is only changed 2% though since the screen is the energy hog on this phone, but for the price and it can do 60Hz somehow, it is still an amazing deal. I just prefer never needing to zoom on my books... (root required, though. I am still amazed resolution options aren't in the LG G3's developers settings) edit- I think some of the custom ROMs are smoother, only problem is the stock camera app has the best picture quality...", '>>{JeffIpsaLoquitor} : I believe so. You got the phone "for a penny." Biggest racket since cassette tapes at Colombia!', '>>{PeanutButterChicken} : Yup. Literally the only reason why I bought one. Gonna switch back with the next Note.', '>>{PM_ME_YOUR_BOOKSHELF} : The plus has an extra gig of ram as well', ">>{santaisafraud} : I think there's a general confusion between the (minority) of users who say that apple is doomed (most of these in my opinion are actually users like yourself who say it sarcastically) and those who voice their frustration with the direction that Apple is going. Same with the people who were annoyed with the new MBPs, their annoyances are still valid and just because sales show that more people are buying the new MBP, doesn't invalidate their opinions. It just shows that they have to adapt or choose another option.", '>>{a_moody} : Their revenues are inversely proportional to the number of ports their devices have.', '>>{jacobc436} : TBF my other laptop I got for free also from 2008 runs windows 10 like a breeze.', ">>{System0verlord} : And I'd imagine it has more than 2 GB of RAM and is way larger than the MBA.", '>>{System0verlord} : Really? The MBA was critiqued for being underpowered then.', ">>{uncertain-ithink} : Yo I'd be more than happy to take it off your hands :P", ">>{PamZero} : I've been contemplating exchanging my 7+ for the 7 since I got it a little over a week ago. It's mainly due to the size in my pocket & in my hands. My hands are large enough to use it but I feel like I'm going to drop it multiple times a day. I just can't decide if I want to part with the absolutely amazing battery. I do take and edit a ton of photos and videos with my phone, but not exactly sure how much I will use the 56mm lens (used it once to test it out), portrait mode is fun to play with but again, not sure how much I'll actually use it, so I feel pretty confident the regular 7's camera would work for me. I love the fact that this plus battery lasts me all day with what I would consider more than average use (laying in bed now with 51% left, and took off the charger a little over 16 hours ago). I was a block away from the Apple Store tonight so I stopped in to check the regular 7 out again, and it is the perfect size for me but the 2 Apple employees I spoke to (who both own a plus) quickly tried to talk me out of exchanging because of 4 main reasons: screen resolution, battery size, dual cameras and 1 extra gb of ram. So I played with a 7 and honestly didn't see a difference in the screen, nor did I see a difference in the speed. I was told by the one employee that his wife has had the 7 since launch and is very disappointed with the battery coming from a 6+, and that scares me. Yeah, they have a battery case that I would have to invest in for days out of town and traveling but that just adds more bulk/weight. So I have a tough decision to make over the next 2 days (Thursday is the last day I'll be able to exchange since I'll be out of town all weekend and was told technically only have 13 days for the exchange since the day I got it counts as day 1). It's not the end of the world with whatever decision I make, I would just love to have a phone that fits in my pocket without discomfort and I can use with 1 hand without fear of dropping it but want a battery that lasts me all day without worry about having to recharge.", ">>{ryangehret} : I couldn't imagine using a phone that large day to day.", ">>{Captain_Midnight} : I had an employer-supplied 5S for a little while. Thing was so light and compact that I had to pat my pocket to double-check that it was on me. And that was after I put a case on it. I can't do without the fingerprint sensor on these new phones, though.", ">>{jtory} : If you can't believe official earnings reports, then there's nothing that will convince you that Apple is doing more than well.", ">>{Merovean} : Right? I need that crystal ball, a dead cat, and some extra cool aid. But you're not wrong... I'm not thinking the world is flat, though I am thinking there's a whiff of desperation to this quarters statements.", ">>{Fortune_Cat} : So do you think it's even a fair comparison then", '>>{Fortune_Cat} : I used sell computers. Really sad seeing folks getting ripped off', ">>{Knigar} : It's a shame they don't give a shit about their computers anymore.", '>>{Mrpornogoregrinder} : You will regret it. I had the same concerns as you and once I changed it, I regretted it. Buy a smaller case, if you are a butter fingers well just try to be more careful. I only use a case when I go out and drink. Stay with the plus.', ">>{breannaward85} : As much I like the big ass screen, the better battery life, I just couldn't really use it. My hands are small as fuck😩. The 6 barley fits one hand. I have to use two. I got a 7 this go around.", ">>{winphan} : I did not upgrade to '7' because of headphone jack. I use it everywhere. I really hope they bring it back in iPhone 8 and until then, I will keep using my iPhone 6s.", ">>{WeatherWrestlingGuy} : Hate to burst your bubble, but the iPhone 8 will not have a headphone jack. The coming Samsung phones won't have a headphone jack. The headphone jack is old tech. Use the adapter that comes with the phone, or switch to wireless headphones. The latter is so much better than a 60 year old piece of tech in my brand new device, which is what the headphone jack is.", ">>{Akwardadam} : I switched from a 6 to a 7+. I picked up my 6 the other day and couldn't even slightly imagine going back to the smaller screen. Try to use a smaller phone for a few minutes before you make your choice", ">>{iHateMyUserName2} : [So 4 months ago, I made a bet with another user that this wouldn't be a flop](https://www.reddit.com/r/iphone/comments/51jzas/new_first_world_problem/d7e6yt5/) based on the fact that the loss of the 3.5mm isn't that big of a deal. I've never been so happy to have such a clear win with an internet argument lol.", ">>{iamthehtown} : I'm not going to feed into this too much but you guys are really annoying. Some people do not like using Windows. I have used it for years, and prefer OS X. I've had Acer, Asus, HP, Sony, Gateway, Dell.. I've built my own computer as well. I don't play games anymore and I use my MacBook for work. I am very happy with it and I did compare what I wanted to other fanless laptops available. I bought what I wanted. You can lay off the condescending attitude.", ">>{0011010001110001} : Not for lossless audio sonny, now where's my cane?", ">>{eighteencircle9} : These are the exact reasons I'm on 7. It's the ease of use I valued more than big battery. Battery is very subjective. The bigger and better, the more you start using your phone and end result is just same. I am not clumsy but at times do drop my phone. So a case or naked. Either way makes 7+ humongous.", ">>{Fortune_Cat} : The people I'm talking about have no idea what they want. They just buy it because it's trendy", '>>{0011010001110001} : Sheeples are peoples just like you!!!! Lets protest!!!!', ">>{beesandbarbs} : Well you can also build a really small PC and connect it to a good 4k display for far less money. It's only the things that you can't build yourself i.e. laptops where you can't say Dell, Apple etc. are overpriced.", ">>{SlurpeeMolot} : They won't. It's time to move into the 21st century, grandpa. With all due respect.", ">>{SlurpeeMolot} : It's not what I want to hear, therefore someone must be breaking the law.", '>>{alexbhood} : Yeah that\'s definitely a contract subsidy. We do the installment plans now and people still come in wanting to know where their "free phone" is. It\'s a real struggle to convince those people they were actually getting ripped off.', '>>{eighteencircle9} : I came to 7 from a 950 XL. I feel the other way after using 7. I think 7+ is huge just like OP. Every time I pick up a big screen phone first thing I notice is weight and poor handling.', '>>{mikeofhyrule} : Not gonna happen my man. You want excellent Water Proof. Get rid of the gaping hole lined with copper. The people have spoken they want water proof over a headphone jack', ">>{eighteencircle9} : Those 4 reasons aren't really 4. You have bigger battery because at that resolution and that size you NEED big battery. That extra RAM is essential because you have fancy camera for well lit environment. All in all it has a camera that only works well on well lit environment and big screen. Everything else isn't there to benefit you, it's to support other two hardware enhancements.", ">>{hammerheadtiger} : The performance is pretty good, I had some overheating issues for a few weeks, but that solved itself. There is no graphics card, and as a result, you cannot run games, not even on low graphics, forget Overwatch, Civ V is a struggle. I use it as a portable programming machine and it serves that purpose well, battery life is great and I can leave my house for the day without a charger confidently, the screen is sort of flimsy though and has some small light bleed in random places, I might see if I can get a warranty replacement. The convertible aspect of it is useless as I'm used to iPads that weigh less than a pound, and this thing is more than 3 pounds of odd sharp corners and unwieldy mess.", ">>{wizzardyls} : MacBooks just seem far better built, and more solid. Yes this is a gorgeous laptop, but is it the same quality of engineering as a MacBook? I personally don't think so...", ">>{Nitemare3219} : Sorry but that is just a clueless response. The S8 will very likely have a headphone jack. Samsung has no incentive to remove it like Apple did (to gouge consumers/manufacturers for Lightning port royalties). Just because the headphone jack is old does NOT mean it needs replacing. The power outlets in your home are an old design, yet they work perfectly fine, don't they? Wireless audio quality will never match that of a cabled connection. Using the stupid adapter is no different than having another damn hole on the phone for the headphone jack, except now, you get to deal with losing the adapter, breaking the adapter, and dealing with a sub-par quality DAC/amp inside the tiny adapter for poor audio quality. Oh, and if you don't have the adapter with you, now you're possibly inconvenienced by not being able to hook into a stereo somewhere to play music, and you can't go with a cabled connection and charge the phone at the same time. Wow, such progress. Much advancement. It was a worthless compromise.", '>>{p3t3or} : Does anyone know or has anyone found any text regarding having both the docking station / external Asus graphics plugged in at the same time. There is only one USB-C on it, but the docking station also has a USB-C on it as well. Can you run both at the same time?', '>>{p3t3or} : New phones are being sold with 4GB of RAM.', '>>{Akwardadam} : I suppose I adjusted to the larger screen quickly. However if OP has been using the + it would still be wise to play around with the smaller screen first.', '>>{Sweizzer} : Is it $399 by now? My bad.', '>>{eighteencircle9} : I mean 50g heavier has to count for something? I know when folks shot down phones for crossing the 150g magic threshold in the past.', ">>{MaZeR4455} : Sounds like very specific use cases to you specifically. It DIDN'T work for me just to provide some annecdotal information into the mix. I wasn't going to purchase multiple adapters to leave hooked up to my audio equipment, of which I would have to constantly add and remove depending on my source. I ended up returning the phone.", '>>{WipeMan} : I have a first Zenbook. At my i7 and 10 ram. 2 Gb sew in motherboard and bought an 8 gb card. Total 10 gb. Powered Fallout 4.', '>>{renatofontes} : No touchscreen makes me sad, I hope they release a touchscreen/qhd model later on :) It looks awesome anyway, it will probably be my next laptop', ">>{Retosteante} : Time ago I switched from 6+ to 6, and now I have bought a 7 because of the size. It's more confortable, and it's my best choice. IMHO, the Plus versions are for 2 meters men with 100kg with giant pockets, because I couldn't put an iPhone Plus in my jeans; impossible. Sorry for my english, i'm not native. Edit: It isn't a downgrade, it's an upgrade if you feel better with an iPhone 7 than with an iPhone 7 Plus.", ">>{extraGuac} : The S7 is rated as more water resistant than the iPhone 7 while also having a headphone jack. It seems like one doesn't have to come at the cost of another.", ">>{ZKXX} : I went from a 6s Plus to a regular 7. It's just so much easier. The Plus was so beautiful but not practical for me.", ">>{renatofontes} : Both the Razer Core and the asus gpu adapter have 4 usb 3.0 connectors and a lan port.... What I haven't found yet is if there is a way to charge the computer while having it connected to this gpu adapters =/", '>>{PamZero} : Right but all that is a benefit to me, so they are on my pro/con list for making a decision to switch or not. So the plus is better at low light shots over the regular 7? I thought the main cameras were identical, and the only difference was the optical (2x) zoom lens and ability to do portraits?', ">>{eighteencircle9} : Plus isn't any better in low light than normal. In low light the second camera doesn't even get involved. Same with extra RAM and battery - for that big ass screen your usage isn't going to drain it but screen time will consume more battery. So it's analogous to buying a car with bigger tank so that you can have more fuel but if it's going to use more fuel than another car with smaller tank, eventually you get the same miles out of each.", '>>{fellybacca} : I may be in the minority but after using my 6+ for 2 years, I went with the regular 7. I loved the battery life of the plus but there was far too many cons for me.', ">>{corpski} : From experience, what you said about the batteries isn't accurate. While I generally don't disagree with you, I own both a 6s and 6s+. I use both for different carriers in my country. Without any doubt, with general use on both phones, the 6s+'s battery lasts far longer than the 6s'. It's even come to a point where I charge the 6s every night, while I have to charge the plus during unpredictable and odd hours, between 30-40 hours from the last charge.", '>>{mikeofhyrule} : The head phone jack is not water resistant, it relies on a rubber seal. ANY crack or wear to that seal, your fucked.', ">>{PamZero} : Well, I did opt for the optional 32gal gas tank in my Ram so I do not have to fill up as often especially on long road trips and I love it :) I get that the plus has a larger screen/overall size and because of that they have room for a larger battery to power everything and the battery lasts a lot longer than the regular 7. I've been asking family, friends and reading on reddit/forums, people with the 7 and average to heavy usage have to juice their phone up by dinner time to make it through the rest of the day, and with my Plus I can last AT LEAST a whole day (7am-midnight) with heavy usage and still have some battery left. So comparing my Ram and its larger gas tank to an identical Ram with a regular gas tank, yes we get the same gas mileage, but I visit the gas station less often. The 7+ has a larger battery and gets longer life than a 7, and that is the only point I am trying to stress for myself and others who are thinking about switching from 7+ to 7. I just don't want to plan charging my phone around the activities I am going to be doing (ex: hurry up and get on a charger after work so when I go out I have enough juice) OR I guess I could just get a bulky battery case and be at ease.", '>>{TOO_FUTURE} : Get a smaller case. I got the apple leather one and the phone is vey manageable after upgrading from a 6', ">>{WeatherWrestlingGuy} : I'll eat my metaphorical hat if Samsung doesn't ditch the useless headphone jack by next year. USB-C dude. Get over it. Apple was just ahead of the curve. Use wireless, use the adapter, or use a shittier old device. Stop the bitching. It's not a problem.", ">>{WeatherWrestlingGuy} : I understand that argument. But if you're wanting the highest quality audio, you'll sit at a computer with the proper equipment.", '>>{alexaday} : Just put a cracked OSX onto your new windows laptop....', '>>{alexaday} : There are literally dozens of "Zenbooks" over the last 4 years, ranging from $400 to $2500. Your comment doesn\'t say anything about a specific "Zenbook" either. It\'s a brand name with the only universal similarity being "pretty and fast". Otherwise, build quality varies wildly with the model (and the price). My 2013 "Zenbook Infinity", for example, has my favorite touchpad and keyboard of any laptop I\'ve used, bar the Macbook Air, and it has no issues keeping up with high-end 2016 ultrabooks. Buy one of the $500 low-end models in the early ux305 series, and you will definitely see some compromises.', '>>{alexaday} : To be fair, where IS the comparable windows ultrabook? I think that Asus made a good decision 2 years ago when they decided to ignore the PC market and start focusing the Macbook market. The dozen Zenbooks iterations since then all targeted the corresponding apple device: the ux305s are cheaper MBA replicas, the ux303s are cheaper MBP replicas, the ux501s are as close to a MBP15 challenge as you could get. But then when Asus does their crazy engineering shit every few years, where is the windows comparison? The ux301la was the first broadwell ultrabook iirc, and it was straight up marketed as a "MBP in a MBA body". Here they are pushing for a MBP in a MacBook body. Another Zenbook getting released at the same time as this shoves 1.5TB, nvidia 940M GPU, i7 6700u, 2K screen, 4 full ports into the "body of a MacBook air". Heck, these come in _Rose Gold_. lol They themselves want to be the Apple of the PC market.', ">>{WeatherWrestlingGuy} : The lack of a headphone jack is only a problem when you make it a problem. Otherwise, it's perfectly fine. When I get my new iPhone this weekend, I will not have a single problem with there not being a headphone jack. Why? Because I have already switched to the current standard of headphones. Wireless.", '>>{joelala1} : I downgraded and I am happy. Will you be? I can not say. But I am. :)', ">>{apalooza9} : These look like they would be grippy but I dont think they're out yet: https://www.incipio.com/cases/iphone-cases/iphone-7-plus-cases/ngp-advanced-iphone-7-plus-case.html I bought this one, seems to be sufficient enough: http://www.spigen.com/collections/iphone-7-plus/products/iphone-7-plus-case-rugged-armor", ">>{Nitemare3219} : Wireless is not the standard. It's for people who prefer convenience (lack of wiring), but also inconvenience (charging), and worse sound quality. There's a reason my Sennheiser HD 800 S headphones cost $1,700 and are WIRED. There's a reason my Shure SE846 IEMs cost $1,000 and are WIRED.", ">>{Nitemare3219} : I don't want to use the garbage EarPods that come with the phone. Bluetooth lacks sound quality, but is acceptable to me for in-car listening (usually). I use wired IEMs in the gym, and in my winter/rainy day vehicle, it lacks Bluetooth audio, so I have to use aux. So that's 2 adapters (gym and car) that I need. I'm fine with that and leaving the adapters plugged in. But it's still an unnecessary inconvenience. It is no different than just leaving the damn headphone jack, because there are still plenty of people like me who are using wired connections, for good reason. I don't want to deal with connection drop outs, worse sound quality, or recharging another device.", ">>{apalooza9} : It's rated to withstand a drop from X inches or feet. All depends on the rating.", '>>{Nitemare3219} : I did not make it a problem. Apple made the problem by needlessly eliminating it. They removed 1 port, and people will still used wired connections via Lightning... so in essence, NOTHING has changed. It was an unfriendly move, and Apple\'s "reasoning" behind it is pure garbage. Maybe they really didn\'t have the room in the device for it. Maybe they just wanted to profit even more from Lightning. Maybe both. Either way, it was a terrible move IMO.', '>>{alexaday} : https://www.asus.com/Notebooks/UX310UQ/ This might serve you better. Basically bumps the form factor from macbook to macbook air, but the specs get a nice buff as a result.', ">>{FloppyDiskFish} : If I understood correctly that's mostly for the camera. I'm not sure if it's available systemwide. It should be but I remember reading that it was there primarily because of their camera tricks.", ">>{WeatherWrestlingGuy} : If you're paying that much for headphones, perhaps you should listen to audio on a computer with more high end equipment. But, instead you're on the internet complaining that a device doesn't have 60 year old tech in it. Phones this year and on will not have the jack anymore. Get over it.", ">>{Nitemare3219} : A computer by default does not have better equipment. To me it sounds like you don't know much about audio hardware, so I'm not sure why you're pushing so hard to drop the headphone jack when you lack the knowledge to make a sound judgement. I'll be sure to revisit this comment in 2 months for the official S8 announcement showing a headphone jack (leaks already do have it). I'm sure the Pixel won't be dropping it anytime soon, either.", ">>{Fidodo} : I didn't realize the gens first model always dropped the suffix.", ">>{phujeb} : why would you put your laptop in checked luggage?!! That's asking for trouble. Even if the baggage handlers dont smash it from throwing your bags about, theft is very common - at least in europe.", ">>{IdrissElba} : I had the 7+ and felt the exact same way. About three days ago I went into the Apple Store to exchange it for the smaller 7 and I kinda regret it. I only miss the better camera, battery life, and higher resolution. In the end I feel like the comfort I gained made it worthwhile. I've never been a big fan of huge phones. And to be frank, the 7 isn't that small.", ">>{apalooza9} : hahahaha well that would probably do some damage too. Or if you're this idiot who just wants to waste money and watch the world burn: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGGPSV_sUNY", ">>{jtory} : Desperation? It's an earnings report? It's simply numbers - numbers that show: The iPhone is at its most popular ever, Apple is still the most valuable company in the world and despite their massive profits, their revenue grew this quarter. They're not desperate, they're running away with their success - it's like calling Germany desperate when they were up 7-1 to Brazil.", ">>{thorpup} : I understand. It's a hard choice but you would know best since you've enjoyed both sizes. Both phones are awesome. When the 6 came out, I got the 6 Plus, but after a week I returned it for the normal sized one, since I had come from a 5 and it just felt weird. So I've done what you have before. But then after 5 or 6 months I regretted not staying with the +, the upgrade in screen size and battery were exactly what I needed. So when the 6s+ came out I got that, and now have the 7+, and loving it and used to the size. Just wish the Matte Black wasn't so slippery so I can use it without fear of dropping on the subway or in crowded spots. My girlfriend, who has much smaller hands, used my 6s+ until I sold it and while it took her a while to get used to it, she loved it and did not want to go back to the 6. I would've given it to her but I just got a ridiculously good offer yesterday for it.", '>>{Merovean} : Love how the reddit basement dwellers immediately work themselves up with their little biases and assumptions. Have had iphones since the 4, I like my phone, but to be so defensive is silly.', ">>{Merovean} : I was trying to agree with you that it's silly for me to be dubious, thus the dead cat etc... And whiff, whiff is an important word here I think. You ever just type what you're thinking, what you're thinking when looking at an EPS, listening to the news, the internet rumblings, the lack of innovation, the sad Macbook, etc?", '>>{MS49SF} : I have a nice pair of B&O bluetooth headphones but I often use them with the cord because it can be a pain to switch between devices or remember to charge them. Wireless can be nice but there are times that I really prefer the headphone jack.', '>>{thenakedgat} : Haha man it would really suck to get nailed by that thing!', '>>{Kilmonjaro} : The iPhone 7+ also uses the ram to keep more apps open in the background', ">>{jtory} : Mmm yeah, that's the narrative that's set up - especially on Reddit. Goes to show how many people confidently get Apple wrong these days - you can't believe anything anymore.", ">>{MMMREESESCUPS} : I frankly don't see how anybody browsing this subreddit given the choice between the standard and plus model wouldn't just take the plus model it really is a superior device and offers the definitive iPhone experience especially if you're a power user who uses battery, camera, ram (I guess thats mostly it apart from screen size).", '>>{Merovean} : Confidently get Apple wrong... I like that, it sums things up nicely.', '>>{winphan} : How about having both options - both jack and bluetooth option? Removing something that is working for everyone is stupidity.', '>>{winphan} : I hate how I have to charge my headphone after every two days.', ">>{winphan} : This shows people buy just-whatever-Apple makes. They don't care about removal of features. They just want the new one because their GF/neighbour bought one."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{YabbaDabaDo} : I wonder how the reddit master minds will spin this one to prove Apple are still doomed', ">>{FreakTalent} : nah that one guy on /r/funny told me Apple is going to go bankrupt because they haven't innovated since Steve. I choose to believe him.", '>>{irrational-pyro} : The dual camera on the plus made me switch as well. Used to have a 6S.', ">>{Vexal} : It's crazy how it's only Apple ever setting the record for iphone sales.", ">>{Axelph} : I heard they're The number one iPhone manufacturer in the US.", '>>{ThatGuyFromCanadia} : this sucks :( really wish something happens that makes them put the headphone jack back on the phone but if theyre breaking sales records that seems like a long shot', '>>{Merovean} : I dunno, genuinely sounds like some massaged numbers... No idea how they would, but from a shareholders perspective, I could see the need to attempt some sunlight press releases given the design mediocrity of their recent offerings.', ">>{RedHerringxx} : It's outdated technology. The record sales prove Apple made the right decision, despite the media frenzy around it. Seriously, it's time to get over it or switch to a device that embraces old tech.", ">>{Darkgod87} : Yep. I'm one of those guys. I'm actually enjoying iOS", '>>{ThatGuyFromCanadia} : I chose the 6s+ over the 7+ because of that choice. If it was atleast type-c then I would be okay with it but even then why would I buy headphones that I can only plug into my phone and not my laptop, desktop, tablet, or friends phones. It just sucks that apple isolated itself so much', ">>{temba_hisarmswide_} : With the Macbooks all switched over to type-C, it's about that time the iPhone get the port too.", '>>{drinkit_or_wearit} : But mah 3.5mm jack!!!11!!1', ">>{mysticportal} : Use the adapter or get wireless headphones which will connect to all your devices. I'm looking forward to an iPhone with no ports. Although, I wonder how it'll work for connecting to iTunes.", ">>{mysticportal} : Doesn't really matter if it's the same look as long as the new device is faster, lasts longer, and includes some new features/specs. Plus most people like showing off that they got the latest iPhone.", ">>{mattchoo86} : I know. I don't think they'll bother putting it back in. It does suck.", ">>{SprSynJn} : No offense meant. It was a joke, despite some not seeing it. I'm a sheep right along with the bunch.", '>>{PeanutButterChicken} : Yup. Literally the only reason why I bought one. Gonna switch back with the next Note.', ">>{santaisafraud} : I think there's a general confusion between the (minority) of users who say that apple is doomed (most of these in my opinion are actually users like yourself who say it sarcastically) and those who voice their frustration with the direction that Apple is going. Same with the people who were annoyed with the new MBPs, their annoyances are still valid and just because sales show that more people are buying the new MBP, doesn't invalidate their opinions. It just shows that they have to adapt or choose another option.", '>>{a_moody} : Their revenues are inversely proportional to the number of ports their devices have.', ">>{jtory} : If you can't believe official earnings reports, then there's nothing that will convince you that Apple is doing more than well.", ">>{Merovean} : Right? I need that crystal ball, a dead cat, and some extra cool aid. But you're not wrong... I'm not thinking the world is flat, though I am thinking there's a whiff of desperation to this quarters statements.", ">>{Knigar} : It's a shame they don't give a shit about their computers anymore.", ">>{winphan} : I did not upgrade to '7' because of headphone jack. I use it everywhere. I really hope they bring it back in iPhone 8 and until then, I will keep using my iPhone 6s.", ">>{WeatherWrestlingGuy} : Hate to burst your bubble, but the iPhone 8 will not have a headphone jack. The coming Samsung phones won't have a headphone jack. The headphone jack is old tech. Use the adapter that comes with the phone, or switch to wireless headphones. The latter is so much better than a 60 year old piece of tech in my brand new device, which is what the headphone jack is.", ">>{iHateMyUserName2} : [So 4 months ago, I made a bet with another user that this wouldn't be a flop](https://www.reddit.com/r/iphone/comments/51jzas/new_first_world_problem/d7e6yt5/) based on the fact that the loss of the 3.5mm isn't that big of a deal. I've never been so happy to have such a clear win with an internet argument lol.", ">>{0011010001110001} : Not for lossless audio sonny, now where's my cane?", '>>{0011010001110001} : Sheeples are peoples just like you!!!! Lets protest!!!!', ">>{SlurpeeMolot} : They won't. It's time to move into the 21st century, grandpa. With all due respect.", ">>{SlurpeeMolot} : It's not what I want to hear, therefore someone must be breaking the law.", '>>{mikeofhyrule} : Not gonna happen my man. You want excellent Water Proof. Get rid of the gaping hole lined with copper. The people have spoken they want water proof over a headphone jack', ">>{Nitemare3219} : Sorry but that is just a clueless response. The S8 will very likely have a headphone jack. Samsung has no incentive to remove it like Apple did (to gouge consumers/manufacturers for Lightning port royalties). Just because the headphone jack is old does NOT mean it needs replacing. The power outlets in your home are an old design, yet they work perfectly fine, don't they? Wireless audio quality will never match that of a cabled connection. Using the stupid adapter is no different than having another damn hole on the phone for the headphone jack, except now, you get to deal with losing the adapter, breaking the adapter, and dealing with a sub-par quality DAC/amp inside the tiny adapter for poor audio quality. Oh, and if you don't have the adapter with you, now you're possibly inconvenienced by not being able to hook into a stereo somewhere to play music, and you can't go with a cabled connection and charge the phone at the same time. Wow, such progress. Much advancement. It was a worthless compromise.", ">>{MaZeR4455} : Sounds like very specific use cases to you specifically. It DIDN'T work for me just to provide some annecdotal information into the mix. I wasn't going to purchase multiple adapters to leave hooked up to my audio equipment, of which I would have to constantly add and remove depending on my source. I ended up returning the phone.", ">>{extraGuac} : The S7 is rated as more water resistant than the iPhone 7 while also having a headphone jack. It seems like one doesn't have to come at the cost of another.", '>>{mikeofhyrule} : The head phone jack is not water resistant, it relies on a rubber seal. ANY crack or wear to that seal, your fucked.', ">>{WeatherWrestlingGuy} : I'll eat my metaphorical hat if Samsung doesn't ditch the useless headphone jack by next year. USB-C dude. Get over it. Apple was just ahead of the curve. Use wireless, use the adapter, or use a shittier old device. Stop the bitching. It's not a problem.", ">>{WeatherWrestlingGuy} : I understand that argument. But if you're wanting the highest quality audio, you'll sit at a computer with the proper equipment.", ">>{WeatherWrestlingGuy} : The lack of a headphone jack is only a problem when you make it a problem. Otherwise, it's perfectly fine. When I get my new iPhone this weekend, I will not have a single problem with there not being a headphone jack. Why? Because I have already switched to the current standard of headphones. Wireless.", ">>{Nitemare3219} : Wireless is not the standard. It's for people who prefer convenience (lack of wiring), but also inconvenience (charging), and worse sound quality. There's a reason my Sennheiser HD 800 S headphones cost $1,700 and are WIRED. There's a reason my Shure SE846 IEMs cost $1,000 and are WIRED.", ">>{Nitemare3219} : I don't want to use the garbage EarPods that come with the phone. Bluetooth lacks sound quality, but is acceptable to me for in-car listening (usually). I use wired IEMs in the gym, and in my winter/rainy day vehicle, it lacks Bluetooth audio, so I have to use aux. So that's 2 adapters (gym and car) that I need. I'm fine with that and leaving the adapters plugged in. But it's still an unnecessary inconvenience. It is no different than just leaving the damn headphone jack, because there are still plenty of people like me who are using wired connections, for good reason. I don't want to deal with connection drop outs, worse sound quality, or recharging another device.", '>>{Nitemare3219} : I did not make it a problem. Apple made the problem by needlessly eliminating it. They removed 1 port, and people will still used wired connections via Lightning... so in essence, NOTHING has changed. It was an unfriendly move, and Apple\'s "reasoning" behind it is pure garbage. Maybe they really didn\'t have the room in the device for it. Maybe they just wanted to profit even more from Lightning. Maybe both. Either way, it was a terrible move IMO.', ">>{WeatherWrestlingGuy} : If you're paying that much for headphones, perhaps you should listen to audio on a computer with more high end equipment. But, instead you're on the internet complaining that a device doesn't have 60 year old tech in it. Phones this year and on will not have the jack anymore. Get over it.", ">>{Nitemare3219} : A computer by default does not have better equipment. To me it sounds like you don't know much about audio hardware, so I'm not sure why you're pushing so hard to drop the headphone jack when you lack the knowledge to make a sound judgement. I'll be sure to revisit this comment in 2 months for the official S8 announcement showing a headphone jack (leaks already do have it). I'm sure the Pixel won't be dropping it anytime soon, either.", ">>{jtory} : Desperation? It's an earnings report? It's simply numbers - numbers that show: The iPhone is at its most popular ever, Apple is still the most valuable company in the world and despite their massive profits, their revenue grew this quarter. They're not desperate, they're running away with their success - it's like calling Germany desperate when they were up 7-1 to Brazil.", '>>{Merovean} : Love how the reddit basement dwellers immediately work themselves up with their little biases and assumptions. Have had iphones since the 4, I like my phone, but to be so defensive is silly.', ">>{Merovean} : I was trying to agree with you that it's silly for me to be dubious, thus the dead cat etc... And whiff, whiff is an important word here I think. You ever just type what you're thinking, what you're thinking when looking at an EPS, listening to the news, the internet rumblings, the lack of innovation, the sad Macbook, etc?", '>>{MS49SF} : I have a nice pair of B&O bluetooth headphones but I often use them with the cord because it can be a pain to switch between devices or remember to charge them. Wireless can be nice but there are times that I really prefer the headphone jack.', ">>{jtory} : Mmm yeah, that's the narrative that's set up - especially on Reddit. Goes to show how many people confidently get Apple wrong these days - you can't believe anything anymore.", '>>{Merovean} : Confidently get Apple wrong... I like that, it sums things up nicely.', '>>{winphan} : How about having both options - both jack and bluetooth option? Removing something that is working for everyone is stupidity.', '>>{winphan} : I hate how I have to charge my headphone after every two days.', ">>{winphan} : This shows people buy just-whatever-Apple makes. They don't care about removal of features. They just want the new one because their GF/neighbour bought one."], [">>{greatcaffeine} : I did that last year with the 6s Plus and 6s. It was fine, but I ultimately missed the battery life enough that I'm back on a 7 Plus this year. The camera is nice to have, but I think they made enough improvements with the regular size model to make it worthwhile as well. So in the end, it just comes down to whether or not you're willing to sacrifice that gigantic battery.", '>>{bumpkinspicefatte} : You do whatever makes you happier. There will be people who will commend or criticize you. It is your job to do what makes you happier and to not give a shit. With that being said, weigh out your values and the technical specs. These are two different models with pluses (no pun intended) and minuses. Does the smaller frame outweigh the technical differences in your value system? I am a vehement 6S owner and did not go to the 6S+. This year I will be moving onto the 7+.', ">>{wund3rground} : I snagged one of these cases from Best Buy and I love it. It's grippy, military drop protection, and it adds almost zero bulk. May be worth looking into. http://www.bestbuy.com/site/platinum-d30-protective-case-for-apple-iphone-7-plus-black/5559800.p?skuId=5559800", ">>{misterkevo} : Thanks - appreciate the suggestion. I'm currently using a Spigen case - it's not as bulky as some, which is nice for sure.", ">>{saullyj} : I went from a 6S Plus to a 6S, and then ultimately back to a 6S Plus and now to the 7 Plus. While I like the smaller form factor, I've gotten used to the bigger screen and I think the resolution is far superior. The 7's screen is really, really nice, but can't compare to the 1080p resolution. It all depends on what you use the phone for. If you're really into taking photos with the 7 Plus, you'll miss having the 56mm equivalent lens. I think the battery life is significantly better than the 7, as well.", '>>{misterkevo} : The only spec differences between the 7 and 7+ are the screen size, dual camera and battery correct? Otherwise I believe the internals are identical.', '>>{c0rtexiphan} : I have this case and I love it! Protection all around, minimal drop protection, but very slim! http://www.spigen.com/collections/iphone-7-plus/products/iphone-7-plus-case-liquid-armor', '>>{bumpkinspicefatte} : Nope, there are still several other differences, both hardware (2gb of RAM on the 7 and 3gb of RAM on the 7+) and software (portrait mode exclusive to 7+).', ">>{mcarrode} : I had a rhinoshield bumper case on my 6+. The phone was in pretty much perfect condition when I traded it in for the 7 (I have one on my 7 now). It adds a good bit of durability and keeps the phone pretty slim. It obviously won't protect the back from keys or coins in your pocket, but I make an effort to keep my phone alone in my pocket.", ">>{epik} : I returned a plus and went all the way down to an SE. It's actually faster than the plus in opening a lot of apps for some reason, perhaps the lower resolution. I don't have issues with the smaller keyboard and don't need 3d touch or the better camera. Also, not missing haptic engine or faster fingerprint sensor. And those are about the only things the plus offer. So now I've got a lighter, more comfortable to carry iphone that is faster and has unreal battery life. ipad mini 2 was still a lot better to use for general browsing than the plus anyway.", '>>{jkslate} : After going from the Note line down to the s7 and iphone 6s line, I will never look back. The larger phones are great, but they\'re just too damn big for everyday use. I don\'t miss the larger screen, even small text isnt an issue on a 4.7" screen. I read kindle on my phone everyday and it\'s not even a slight issue. 4.7" is the perfect size for me. I\'m a 6\' 200lb guy with medium/large hands.', '>>{i_hug_peas} : I tried to make the switch to the 7 from the 6+ but I returned it after one day, the screen resolution is lower on the 7 vs the + and it makes text look fuzzy in comparison.', ">>{elguap} : I couldn't do it after getting so adjusted to the larger display size", ">>{caseydoeswords} : If comfort is a factor, you could consider getting one of the Love Handle straps that adheres to the back of your case. It makes the phone much more manageable IMO, and they're relatively cheap on amazon. c:", '>>{PM_ME_YOUR_BOOKSHELF} : The plus has an extra gig of ram as well', ">>{uncertain-ithink} : Yo I'd be more than happy to take it off your hands :P", ">>{PamZero} : I've been contemplating exchanging my 7+ for the 7 since I got it a little over a week ago. It's mainly due to the size in my pocket & in my hands. My hands are large enough to use it but I feel like I'm going to drop it multiple times a day. I just can't decide if I want to part with the absolutely amazing battery. I do take and edit a ton of photos and videos with my phone, but not exactly sure how much I will use the 56mm lens (used it once to test it out), portrait mode is fun to play with but again, not sure how much I'll actually use it, so I feel pretty confident the regular 7's camera would work for me. I love the fact that this plus battery lasts me all day with what I would consider more than average use (laying in bed now with 51% left, and took off the charger a little over 16 hours ago). I was a block away from the Apple Store tonight so I stopped in to check the regular 7 out again, and it is the perfect size for me but the 2 Apple employees I spoke to (who both own a plus) quickly tried to talk me out of exchanging because of 4 main reasons: screen resolution, battery size, dual cameras and 1 extra gb of ram. So I played with a 7 and honestly didn't see a difference in the screen, nor did I see a difference in the speed. I was told by the one employee that his wife has had the 7 since launch and is very disappointed with the battery coming from a 6+, and that scares me. Yeah, they have a battery case that I would have to invest in for days out of town and traveling but that just adds more bulk/weight. So I have a tough decision to make over the next 2 days (Thursday is the last day I'll be able to exchange since I'll be out of town all weekend and was told technically only have 13 days for the exchange since the day I got it counts as day 1). It's not the end of the world with whatever decision I make, I would just love to have a phone that fits in my pocket without discomfort and I can use with 1 hand without fear of dropping it but want a battery that lasts me all day without worry about having to recharge.", ">>{ryangehret} : I couldn't imagine using a phone that large day to day.", ">>{Captain_Midnight} : I had an employer-supplied 5S for a little while. Thing was so light and compact that I had to pat my pocket to double-check that it was on me. And that was after I put a case on it. I can't do without the fingerprint sensor on these new phones, though.", '>>{Mrpornogoregrinder} : You will regret it. I had the same concerns as you and once I changed it, I regretted it. Buy a smaller case, if you are a butter fingers well just try to be more careful. I only use a case when I go out and drink. Stay with the plus.', ">>{breannaward85} : As much I like the big ass screen, the better battery life, I just couldn't really use it. My hands are small as fuck😩. The 6 barley fits one hand. I have to use two. I got a 7 this go around.", ">>{Akwardadam} : I switched from a 6 to a 7+. I picked up my 6 the other day and couldn't even slightly imagine going back to the smaller screen. Try to use a smaller phone for a few minutes before you make your choice", ">>{eighteencircle9} : These are the exact reasons I'm on 7. It's the ease of use I valued more than big battery. Battery is very subjective. The bigger and better, the more you start using your phone and end result is just same. I am not clumsy but at times do drop my phone. So a case or naked. Either way makes 7+ humongous.", '>>{eighteencircle9} : I came to 7 from a 950 XL. I feel the other way after using 7. I think 7+ is huge just like OP. Every time I pick up a big screen phone first thing I notice is weight and poor handling.', ">>{eighteencircle9} : Those 4 reasons aren't really 4. You have bigger battery because at that resolution and that size you NEED big battery. That extra RAM is essential because you have fancy camera for well lit environment. All in all it has a camera that only works well on well lit environment and big screen. Everything else isn't there to benefit you, it's to support other two hardware enhancements.", '>>{Akwardadam} : I suppose I adjusted to the larger screen quickly. However if OP has been using the + it would still be wise to play around with the smaller screen first.', '>>{eighteencircle9} : I mean 50g heavier has to count for something? I know when folks shot down phones for crossing the 150g magic threshold in the past.', ">>{Retosteante} : Time ago I switched from 6+ to 6, and now I have bought a 7 because of the size. It's more confortable, and it's my best choice. IMHO, the Plus versions are for 2 meters men with 100kg with giant pockets, because I couldn't put an iPhone Plus in my jeans; impossible. Sorry for my english, i'm not native. Edit: It isn't a downgrade, it's an upgrade if you feel better with an iPhone 7 than with an iPhone 7 Plus.", ">>{ZKXX} : I went from a 6s Plus to a regular 7. It's just so much easier. The Plus was so beautiful but not practical for me.", '>>{PamZero} : Right but all that is a benefit to me, so they are on my pro/con list for making a decision to switch or not. So the plus is better at low light shots over the regular 7? I thought the main cameras were identical, and the only difference was the optical (2x) zoom lens and ability to do portraits?', ">>{eighteencircle9} : Plus isn't any better in low light than normal. In low light the second camera doesn't even get involved. Same with extra RAM and battery - for that big ass screen your usage isn't going to drain it but screen time will consume more battery. So it's analogous to buying a car with bigger tank so that you can have more fuel but if it's going to use more fuel than another car with smaller tank, eventually you get the same miles out of each.", '>>{fellybacca} : I may be in the minority but after using my 6+ for 2 years, I went with the regular 7. I loved the battery life of the plus but there was far too many cons for me.', ">>{corpski} : From experience, what you said about the batteries isn't accurate. While I generally don't disagree with you, I own both a 6s and 6s+. I use both for different carriers in my country. Without any doubt, with general use on both phones, the 6s+'s battery lasts far longer than the 6s'. It's even come to a point where I charge the 6s every night, while I have to charge the plus during unpredictable and odd hours, between 30-40 hours from the last charge.", ">>{PamZero} : Well, I did opt for the optional 32gal gas tank in my Ram so I do not have to fill up as often especially on long road trips and I love it :) I get that the plus has a larger screen/overall size and because of that they have room for a larger battery to power everything and the battery lasts a lot longer than the regular 7. I've been asking family, friends and reading on reddit/forums, people with the 7 and average to heavy usage have to juice their phone up by dinner time to make it through the rest of the day, and with my Plus I can last AT LEAST a whole day (7am-midnight) with heavy usage and still have some battery left. So comparing my Ram and its larger gas tank to an identical Ram with a regular gas tank, yes we get the same gas mileage, but I visit the gas station less often. The 7+ has a larger battery and gets longer life than a 7, and that is the only point I am trying to stress for myself and others who are thinking about switching from 7+ to 7. I just don't want to plan charging my phone around the activities I am going to be doing (ex: hurry up and get on a charger after work so when I go out I have enough juice) OR I guess I could just get a bulky battery case and be at ease.", '>>{TOO_FUTURE} : Get a smaller case. I got the apple leather one and the phone is vey manageable after upgrading from a 6', '>>{joelala1} : I downgraded and I am happy. Will you be? I can not say. But I am. :)', ">>{apalooza9} : These look like they would be grippy but I dont think they're out yet: https://www.incipio.com/cases/iphone-cases/iphone-7-plus-cases/ngp-advanced-iphone-7-plus-case.html I bought this one, seems to be sufficient enough: http://www.spigen.com/collections/iphone-7-plus/products/iphone-7-plus-case-rugged-armor", ">>{apalooza9} : It's rated to withstand a drop from X inches or feet. All depends on the rating.", ">>{FloppyDiskFish} : If I understood correctly that's mostly for the camera. I'm not sure if it's available systemwide. It should be but I remember reading that it was there primarily because of their camera tricks.", ">>{IdrissElba} : I had the 7+ and felt the exact same way. About three days ago I went into the Apple Store to exchange it for the smaller 7 and I kinda regret it. I only miss the better camera, battery life, and higher resolution. In the end I feel like the comfort I gained made it worthwhile. I've never been a big fan of huge phones. And to be frank, the 7 isn't that small.", ">>{apalooza9} : hahahaha well that would probably do some damage too. Or if you're this idiot who just wants to waste money and watch the world burn: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGGPSV_sUNY", ">>{thorpup} : I understand. It's a hard choice but you would know best since you've enjoyed both sizes. Both phones are awesome. When the 6 came out, I got the 6 Plus, but after a week I returned it for the normal sized one, since I had come from a 5 and it just felt weird. So I've done what you have before. But then after 5 or 6 months I regretted not staying with the +, the upgrade in screen size and battery were exactly what I needed. So when the 6s+ came out I got that, and now have the 7+, and loving it and used to the size. Just wish the Matte Black wasn't so slippery so I can use it without fear of dropping on the subway or in crowded spots. My girlfriend, who has much smaller hands, used my 6s+ until I sold it and while it took her a while to get used to it, she loved it and did not want to go back to the 6. I would've given it to her but I just got a ridiculously good offer yesterday for it.", '>>{thenakedgat} : Haha man it would really suck to get nailed by that thing!', '>>{Kilmonjaro} : The iPhone 7+ also uses the ram to keep more apps open in the background', ">>{MMMREESESCUPS} : I frankly don't see how anybody browsing this subreddit given the choice between the standard and plus model wouldn't just take the plus model it really is a superior device and offers the definitive iPhone experience especially if you're a power user who uses battery, camera, ram (I guess thats mostly it apart from screen size)."], [">>{TheBatmanToMyBruce} : People seem to make this mistake a lot. It's also worth noting that if you've been into subcompacts, ultraportables, netbooks, etc, you're probably used to putting up with some dongles or breakouts or other inconveniences due to the form factor.", ">>{MyPenisIsaWMD} : > Macbook Pros wipe the floor compared to a typical budget friendly Chromebook in terms of... In terms of the package you describe, I prefer my well-spec'd Chromebook, regardless of price. It's simply a faster internet terminal with an awesome screen and very decent everything else for a fraction of the cost. Everything that needs juice, I do on my desktop (couldn't do it on my Macbook anyway). Everything that doesn't require major power is far better served by my Chromebook anyway. The only reason to buy a Macbook for me any longer would be loyalty which I no longer have or a sense of fashion which has departed Apple in general anyway.", '>>{MyPenisIsaWMD} : 2 Comments up I broke it down by markets. I hardly think that I am approaching this from a single perspective.', ">>{ShadowSwipe} : TBH I wouldn't want a windows laptop with 1500 specs because the battery life is probably trash. The one thing I like about my mac is the insane startup and file speeds and the great reliable long battery life. There's a reason people get them and it's not because they're junk, they may not have a lot of kick in terms of power but I did a lot of looking and as a computer guy I still went with a Mac for college because it's ease of use. I already have a badass desktop anyway .", ">>{MyPenisIsaWMD} : >I already explained it twice Followed immediately by > for the fourth bloody time You'll excuse me for not putting too much faith in the explanation of a person who, apparently, cannot count.", '>>{alexbhood} : Were they still using 2 year contracts to subsidize the price of phones back then?', ">>{alexbhood} : I've always found that skinned Android phones don't age well. The G3 didn't run very well a year ago. I don't even want to think about it now. Nexus, HTC, and Motorola phones age very well. Probably because they go light on the skinning.", ">>{Forest_GS} : You can drop the LG G3 to 1080p from it's default 1440p and it is as smooth as those $500+ phones. Battery life is only changed 2% though since the screen is the energy hog on this phone, but for the price and it can do 60Hz somehow, it is still an amazing deal. I just prefer never needing to zoom on my books... (root required, though. I am still amazed resolution options aren't in the LG G3's developers settings) edit- I think some of the custom ROMs are smoother, only problem is the stock camera app has the best picture quality...", '>>{JeffIpsaLoquitor} : I believe so. You got the phone "for a penny." Biggest racket since cassette tapes at Colombia!', '>>{jacobc436} : TBF my other laptop I got for free also from 2008 runs windows 10 like a breeze.', ">>{System0verlord} : And I'd imagine it has more than 2 GB of RAM and is way larger than the MBA.", '>>{System0verlord} : Really? The MBA was critiqued for being underpowered then.', ">>{Fortune_Cat} : So do you think it's even a fair comparison then", '>>{Fortune_Cat} : I used sell computers. Really sad seeing folks getting ripped off', ">>{iamthehtown} : I'm not going to feed into this too much but you guys are really annoying. Some people do not like using Windows. I have used it for years, and prefer OS X. I've had Acer, Asus, HP, Sony, Gateway, Dell.. I've built my own computer as well. I don't play games anymore and I use my MacBook for work. I am very happy with it and I did compare what I wanted to other fanless laptops available. I bought what I wanted. You can lay off the condescending attitude.", ">>{Fortune_Cat} : The people I'm talking about have no idea what they want. They just buy it because it's trendy", ">>{beesandbarbs} : Well you can also build a really small PC and connect it to a good 4k display for far less money. It's only the things that you can't build yourself i.e. laptops where you can't say Dell, Apple etc. are overpriced.", '>>{alexbhood} : Yeah that\'s definitely a contract subsidy. We do the installment plans now and people still come in wanting to know where their "free phone" is. It\'s a real struggle to convince those people they were actually getting ripped off.', ">>{hammerheadtiger} : The performance is pretty good, I had some overheating issues for a few weeks, but that solved itself. There is no graphics card, and as a result, you cannot run games, not even on low graphics, forget Overwatch, Civ V is a struggle. I use it as a portable programming machine and it serves that purpose well, battery life is great and I can leave my house for the day without a charger confidently, the screen is sort of flimsy though and has some small light bleed in random places, I might see if I can get a warranty replacement. The convertible aspect of it is useless as I'm used to iPads that weigh less than a pound, and this thing is more than 3 pounds of odd sharp corners and unwieldy mess.", ">>{wizzardyls} : MacBooks just seem far better built, and more solid. Yes this is a gorgeous laptop, but is it the same quality of engineering as a MacBook? I personally don't think so...", '>>{p3t3or} : Does anyone know or has anyone found any text regarding having both the docking station / external Asus graphics plugged in at the same time. There is only one USB-C on it, but the docking station also has a USB-C on it as well. Can you run both at the same time?', '>>{p3t3or} : New phones are being sold with 4GB of RAM.', '>>{Sweizzer} : Is it $399 by now? My bad.', '>>{WipeMan} : I have a first Zenbook. At my i7 and 10 ram. 2 Gb sew in motherboard and bought an 8 gb card. Total 10 gb. Powered Fallout 4.', '>>{renatofontes} : No touchscreen makes me sad, I hope they release a touchscreen/qhd model later on :) It looks awesome anyway, it will probably be my next laptop', ">>{renatofontes} : Both the Razer Core and the asus gpu adapter have 4 usb 3.0 connectors and a lan port.... What I haven't found yet is if there is a way to charge the computer while having it connected to this gpu adapters =/", '>>{alexaday} : Just put a cracked OSX onto your new windows laptop....', '>>{alexaday} : There are literally dozens of "Zenbooks" over the last 4 years, ranging from $400 to $2500. Your comment doesn\'t say anything about a specific "Zenbook" either. It\'s a brand name with the only universal similarity being "pretty and fast". Otherwise, build quality varies wildly with the model (and the price). My 2013 "Zenbook Infinity", for example, has my favorite touchpad and keyboard of any laptop I\'ve used, bar the Macbook Air, and it has no issues keeping up with high-end 2016 ultrabooks. Buy one of the $500 low-end models in the early ux305 series, and you will definitely see some compromises.', '>>{alexaday} : To be fair, where IS the comparable windows ultrabook? I think that Asus made a good decision 2 years ago when they decided to ignore the PC market and start focusing the Macbook market. The dozen Zenbooks iterations since then all targeted the corresponding apple device: the ux305s are cheaper MBA replicas, the ux303s are cheaper MBP replicas, the ux501s are as close to a MBP15 challenge as you could get. But then when Asus does their crazy engineering shit every few years, where is the windows comparison? The ux301la was the first broadwell ultrabook iirc, and it was straight up marketed as a "MBP in a MBA body". Here they are pushing for a MBP in a MacBook body. Another Zenbook getting released at the same time as this shoves 1.5TB, nvidia 940M GPU, i7 6700u, 2K screen, 4 full ports into the "body of a MacBook air". Heck, these come in _Rose Gold_. lol They themselves want to be the Apple of the PC market.', '>>{alexaday} : https://www.asus.com/Notebooks/UX310UQ/ This might serve you better. Basically bumps the form factor from macbook to macbook air, but the specs get a nice buff as a result.', ">>{Fidodo} : I didn't realize the gens first model always dropped the suffix.", ">>{phujeb} : why would you put your laptop in checked luggage?!! That's asking for trouble. Even if the baggage handlers dont smash it from throwing your bags about, theft is very common - at least in europe."]]

classify and reply